Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/19/2005 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionFILE COPY • CITY OP COLLEGE STATTC-N PluRnrng err Deu~%pmmt Srruica AGENDA Workshop Meeting Planning and 7.oning Commission Tuesday, April I9, 2003, 6:00 p.m. Administrative Conference Room, City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Tiscussion of consent and regular agenda items. Z. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff. ^' Riviera Addition; Case #05-35 (MH/~N} 3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding status of P&Z Plan of Work. • 4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the development of a possible corridor study far the Wellborn Road Gateway Corridor from Greens Prairie Raad to TAMU. 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of UDO/Comprehensive Plan Annual Review. • d. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information ar the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda far a subsequent meeting. 7. Adjourn -ori8L1_t~tion with ~ttornev {, ~ov~'c ~„~; qp~ 1071} ; j~aRi6tz ~tio~ The Planning and Zonuig Comnussion may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in pubfic. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as m the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held This bu7ding is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request fior sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979-761-351"l or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. Agendas posted an intemet Website httn:l/anurw c~~9ov and Cable Access Channel 19. • CITY OP COLLEGE STATION Planning d` £Jetirlopment Services AGENDA Regular Meeting Flannixtg and honing Commission Tuesday, April 19, 2005, 7.00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue Coile;~e Station, Texas 1. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter an a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) • All matters listed under Item 2, Consent Agenda, acre considered routine by the Planning and 7.oning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary and ftnal plat, where sta~'has folrnd compkance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will riot be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the KegularAgenda for furthe~~ conslderr~kon. 2. ~szn~~t ~lg~~ 21 Discussian and passible action on: Minutes - Apri17, 2005, Workshop Meeting Minutes - Apri17, 2005, Regular Meeting 2.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Piat for Horse Haven Phase 3, consisting of 531ots on 12.Ob acres, generally located at Earl Rudder Freeway and Horse Haven Lane. Case #t14-283 (JP jJl~ 2.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Flat for Westfield Village Phases 1-b, consisting of 310 residential lots on 75.651 acres generally located north of Graham Road and east of Victoria. Case #Q5-36 (CC) Reg~~~Agenda. • 3. Discussion and possible action on requests} for absence from meetings. None 4. Presentation, discussion, and possible acrion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by • Commission action. 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Variance Request tv Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations and public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for the F.S. Kapchinski Subdivision, Lat 12, flock 1, consisting of two lots on 0.478 acres, located at 1612 Park Place. Case #05-2b iQP/CC) G. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Lot 1 A, Lot 1G, and the southeast 25 feet of Lot 15, College Heights flock D, generally located at the intersection of University Drive and Macarthur Street, and north of the intersection of University Drive and Nimitz Street, from PDD Planned Development District, A-P Administrative Professional and R-2 Duplex Residential to P-MUD Planned Mixed Use District. Case #05-3? (JP) 7. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit for a Night Club, located in Suite D at 2551 Texas Avenue South in the Homestead Place Shopping Center. Case #05-39 {LB/MH) 8. Discussion and possible acrion on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information ar the recitation of existing policy may he given. .Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda far a subsequent meeting. 9. Adjourn. • Conwlt=lien wlt_k ~Qj,~y {Qov't Cade~bn 5R1.O~,~} I tww;bie adfon 'fhe Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation sub,~ed or attorney-client privHagad information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted sub~act matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session wits be held. This building is wheelchair accessible, Handicapped parking spaces ors available. Any request for sign interpretive service must ba made 48 hours before the msetfng. Ta make arrangements call 979-764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website htto://www.q,~,gov and Cable Access Channel 19. • Consent Agenda 2.1 Discussion and possible action on: Minutes -- April 7, 2005 `V~ork.shop Meeting Minutes -- April 7, 2005 Regular Meeting MINUTES C7 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planxing tr Arrxkpmrnt Serv&•a Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, Apri! 7, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. Administrative Conference Room College Station City Hail 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Shafer, Commissioners Davis, Reynolds, and Nichols. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioners White, Hooton, and Fedora. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT; Councilman Maloney. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Boyer, :Reeves and Prochaska, Senior Planner Fletcher, Director Dunn, Graduate Civil Engineers Cotter and Norton, Transportation Planner Fagle, Assistant Director Simms and Staff Assistant Lindgren. OTIIER CITY STAFF FRESENT: 1. Cali to Order. First Assistant City Attorney Nemcik. Commissioner Shafer called the workshop meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. Commissioner Nichols inquired about Item 5, The Cave of Nantucket Divisions. Commissioner Nichols asked for clarification regarding Wayfare Street. Jennifer Prochaska, Staff Planner, and Joey Dunn, Planning and Development Services Director, gave clarification on the matter. Commissioner Shafer asked for clarification on Items 2.2 and 2.4. Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, gave clarification on the items. Commissioner Shafer inquired about the possibilities of zoning classifications for Item 7. Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, gave clarification on the item. Commissioner Reynolds inquired about the letter received in Item 6. Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner, gave clarification on the item. Commissioner Nichols asked if there were • any issues or concerns with having dense housing next to a railroad. Prochaska stated that there was a concern for any use located next to a railroad and if Commissioners were P8eZ Workshop Minutes April 7, 2405 Page 1 oP 3 concerned about safety issues, the zoning would be the time to address the issues far discretionary review. • 3. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff. ~- Nane 4, Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding PAZ Plan of Work. Mr. Dunn reminded Commissioners that the Plan of Work was on both the workshop and regular agenda. He stated that the plan of work was an the workshop agenda far review and an the regular agenda far adoption. 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding Parkland Dedication. Mr. Dunn stated that Mark Smith, Director of Public Works, would like input from the Commissioners on Parkland Dedication. A handout was distributed to Commissioners and Commissioners were asked to review the handout and give input to Mr. Smith as soon as passible. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the internal process currently used for mailed natives of public hearings. Mr. Dunn gave clarification to Commissioners regarding the problems with the • notification process that have occurred the past few months. Mr. Dunn also informed Commissioners of the new procedures currently being used for the notification process and the new double check system that is currently in place. 7. Presen#ation, discussion, and possible action regarding the Bikeway Plan update. Ken Fagle, Transportation Planner, gave an overview of the Bikeway Plan. 8. Discussion and possible action on fu#ure agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice bas nat been given. A statement of spevific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shalt be limited to a proposal to piece the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Davis stated that he would like to see some type of program developed so that Commercial Property owners would also be required to dedicate a fee or property such as the Parkland Dedication program and the Greenways Program. Mr. Dunn stated that staff would coordinate with the Greenways Coordinator on the matter. • P&Z Workshop Minutes April 7, 2005 Page 2 of 3 9. Adjourn • Commissioner Nichols motioned to adjourn the workshop meeting. Commissioner Reynolds seconded the motion, motion approved {4-0). Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services • • P&Z Workshop Minutes Apr!! ?, 20Q5 Page 3 of 3 MINUTES Regular Meet#ng P#ann#ng and honing Commission • Thursday, April 7, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. Counc#1 Chambers, Coi#ege Station City Hali 1101 Texas Avenue Coliege Station, Texas CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning [S' Developmrnt Service • COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Shafer, Commissioners Davis, Reynolds, and Nichols. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioners White, Hooton, and Fedora. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Maloney. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Boyer, Reeves and Prochazka, Senior Planner Fletcher, Director Dunn, Graduate Civil Engineers Cotter and Norton, Transportation Planner Fogle, Assistant Director Simms and Staff Assistant Lindgren. OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: First Assistant City Attorney Nemcik and Bryan Cook, QTIS. 1. Hear Visitors No visitor spoke. 2. Consent Agenda 2.1 Consideration, discussion and possible action on meeting minutes for: March 17, 2005, Workshop Meeting Minutes March 17, 2005, Regular Meeting Minutes 2.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for Pebble Creek Subdivision, Phases 9D, 9E, 4F, 9G & 9H consisting of 148 lots on 76.11 acres generally located between Congressional Drive, Alum Creek and the future extension of Pebble Creek Parkway. Case #OS-05 (TF/CC) • R&2 Minutes Regular Agenda, April 7, 2005 Page 1 of 4 2.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Pebble Creek Phase 9E consisting of 17 lots on 7.925 acres generally located east of the intersection of Congressional Drive and Cascades Drive. Case #03-~06 (TF/CC) 2.4 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Flat for Pebble Creek Phase 9D consisting of 49 lots on 22.427 acres generally located in the vicinity of Cascades Drive, north of the Alum Creek floodplain and west of the future extension of Pebble Creek Parkway. Case #05-24 (TFICC) 2.5 Presentation, discussion and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for the F&B Road Addition consisting of 3 lots on approximately 14.6 acres generally located approximately 500 feet southwest of the intersection of F&B Road and Narvey Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818). Case #45-31 {LB/JN) Commissioner Nichols motioned to adopt the consent agenda. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0~ Rgg~~ar Agenda 3. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. Commissioner Shafer stated that there is an amendment to the absence requests. Commissioner Davis is in attendance. Absence requests for the following: Ben White • i Marilyn Hoaton John Fedora Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the absence requests, Commissioner Reynolds seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0~ 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. None 5. Public hearing, presentation„ discussion, and possible action on a request for a variance to Section 8-G.b of the Subdivision Regulations, and consideration, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for the Cove of Nantucket Subdivision, consisting of 69 lots and one reserve tract, on 27.7 acres, generally located along the west side of State Highway 6, south of the intersection of State Highway 6 and Nantucket Drive. Case #05-34 (JP) Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner, presented the staff report, and stated that with the exception of the variance the plat is in compliance with all other subdivision regualtions. Veronica Morgan, Mitchell and Morgan, 511 University Drive East, Ste. #204, College • Station, Texas. Ms. Morgan, applicant, spoke in regards to the variance of the item and gave further clarification. She also addressed quesrions from the Commissioners. P$cZ Mint.ites Regular Agenda, April 7, 2005 Page 2 of 4 • Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the variance. Commissioner Davis seconded the motian, motian passed (40). Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the preliminary plat. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0). 6. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning for Callaway Subdivision Phase Il, consisting of approximatly 14 acres, located on the east side of Marion Pugh T7~rive, approximately 500' south of the intersection of George Bush Drive, including a portion of the Luther Street Right-of--Way, from C-1 General Commercial to R-6 High Density Multi-Family. Case #0428 (JP) 3ennifer Prochazka, staff planner, presented staff report and recommended approval of the rezoning. Raybon Metcalf, 141 i Elton, College Station, Texas. Mr. Metcalf, applicant, answered questions from the Commissioners. Commissioner Reynolds made motion to approve the rezoning. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion, motion passed (40). 7. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning for the Pebble Creek Development Company for a portion of a tract consisting of 22.692 acres and generally located at the southwest corner of Greens Prairie Road and Pebble Creek • Parkway from R-4, Multi-family to R-1, Single-family Residential; from R-4 and R-1 to A-P, Administrative-Professional; and R-4 to C-3, Light Commercial. Case #05-16 (TF) Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, presented staff report on the rezoning. Rick DeSoul, 4602 Oakmont Circle, College Station, Texas. Ron Kaiser, 4601 Oakmont Circle, College Station, Texas. Ali Chowdhury, 4603 Colonial Circle, College Station, Texas. Wayne Arrington, 4603 Valleybrook, College Station, Texas. All spoke in opposition to the rezoning of the item. Davis Young, 5204 Whistling Straits, College Station, Texas. Mr. Young, applicant, gave a presentation regarding the rezoning, answered questions and touched on comments made from Commissioners and residents regarding the rezoning. Ted Hopgood, 4600 Oakmont Circle, College Station, Texas. Mr. Hopgood spoke in favor of the rezoning. Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the rezoning with the following condition. Conditions: Maintain a 4S-foot wide buffer in its current, natural condition adjacent to the R 1, Single-family Residential zoning district between Spearman Drive and Pebble Creek Parkway such that na lighting ar other artificial structures are constructed ar placed within this buffer area. Commissioner Davis • seconded the motion, motion passed (3-1). Commissioners in favor of the motion, Davis, Nichols and Reynolds. Commissioner in apposition of the motion, Shafer. P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda, April 7, 2005 Page 3 of 4 8. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on an ordinance rezoning a portion of the Kolbe property proposed to be incorporated into Horse Haven Estates, 0.87 • acres generally located to the southeast of Horse Haven Lane, from A-O Agricultural Open to R-1 Single Family Residential. Case #05-27 (JP) Jennifer Prochazka, staff planner, presented the staff report and recommended approval of the request. Greg Taggart, 2511 A South Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. Mr. Taggart, applicant, answered questions from the Commissioners. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the ordinance rezoning. Commissioner Reyno#ds seconded the motion, motion passed {4-0~ 9. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the Planning 8t Zoning Commission's Plan of Work. Case #05-32 (JD) Mr. Dunn presented the Planning and Zoning Commission Plan of Work for adoption. Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve and accept the Planning and Zoning Commission Plan o#' Work. Commissioner Reynolds seconded motion, motion passed (4-0). 10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member • may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statemern of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda far a subsequent meeting. None Il. Adjourn. Commissioner Davis motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Nichols seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0). Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: • Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda, April 7, 2005 Page 4 of 4 +~Onsent Agenda 2.2 Discussion, and passible action on a Final Plat for horse Haven Phase 3, consisting of 53 lots on 12.4E acres, generally located at Earl Rudder Freeway and Horse Haven Lane, Case #04.2$3 (JP/JN~ • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Planner Report Date: April 5, 2005 Email: jprochazka~cstx.gov Meeting Date: April 19, 2005 Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Horse Haven Phase 3, consisting of 53 lots on 12.06 acres, generally located at Earl Rudder Freeway and Horse Haven Lane. Applicant: Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group, agent for Alton Ofczarzak, property owner. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the condition that the attached Staff Review Comments are addressed. Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Final Plat in preparation for residential development. The applicant is proposing 53 R-1 Single Family Residential lots. Two public pedestrian access easements are proposed with this plat to provide connection to the surrounding greenway. • The Final Plat is in compliance with the approved Preliminary Plat and the Subdivision Regulations. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates the majority of this property as Single-Family Residential Medium Density and Floodplain /Streams. Item Background: The property was annexed in 1977 and zoned A-O at that time. The property was rezoned to R-1 Single Family Residential in 2004. This property has never been platted. A Master Plan and Preliminary Plat of this property were approved last year. The first phase of Horse Haven is now developed as Academy Sporting Goods. A Final Plat of the second phase of this development was approved earlier this year. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: Parks Board accepted fee in lieu of land dedication. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the Final Plat. The options regarding the Final Plat are: ^ Approval ^ Denial r~ • Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Staff Review Comments 5. Copy of Final Plat • • ~` Il~a~ III ~ i i ~ ~ // ~ ~ .` .. \\\ ~~, III S / 1 ~; ~ . ~ ~ ~, A .~ ~~ _. A I ~ \\ I ~s ~ \ V II /,,~ ~= v e y\~` ~n ~_ ~q'r icy--11 ~ ` .. .~ ~~ icy o ~"~ ~~ ~~ ~u yt' ~ W ~.r at' L~~yOa bit ~ `~ uti ~ t, ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,r ~ fl ~, ~ ~ o ~ `~ .~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ _ ~~ t ti ~ ~~ ~ 4 0, 1 ~ rU ~ m ` ~^ c 'b ~' m (~ tip' h-1, a'$~`'P!-epa ~ i m w -- as ~ ~ ^, a~ ~ a ~,~~y2 ~~ ~~o ~ a ~ ~ O \ v ti pp9i '~C•f- 4'~i ~ S a c.~~'eG~C` e w ~~ .~ ` ~ ` ~ . G - ti~~~~fe ~y ~ Rti:~ a ~, ~~ ~~. ~ uota ~~ j~ l~~\.~' ~_ -_ tara~v, o-a -3o vrF c,, Shy `~ ~, M~, V ~ ~ 10`r[ ~ ^ Qf ~q ~P ~ i Sy r ,~ 'iE, / ... ~ ~ k. „~ / ~ ~ ~.~ OF, ~ ~ ~~ J~/ •Y ~\/ ~ ~, sr /l.v ~ ~ f ,,'3y. ~ ~ ~ ~~ .3• ~ / ~ . ~~/ ~r ?%~c.~. ~ ~ ~ ~'~''~ ~' ~ f h' v ,A U l ~ ~ ~ ~/ 4 l '~k ~ // hj f~ / ti ~ ~M1 ~ ~~ ~ ~d /~ j " ~, ? d~ ~~. b~ ~~y, ,~° /~ ~' ~ ~ ' ~~ j" /. 0 a a`~ 2 Y ~i' ~~ (;I'C'Y Of C;C?LLEGE S'T'ATION Plnnnirt~ er UecTlopmrrot Srruitet ~` `~ ~~'(~`/ ~~ FOR OFFICE U E OnN Y `~ P&Z CASE NO.: ~X~ DATE SUBMITTED: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending Final ^ Vacating ^ Replat ($soo.oo) (ssoo.oo) (aaoo.oo) (Eaoo.oo) (ssoo.oo)• 'Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable} ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ Ste; J evelopment Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). ~3-ev; ~rt.s~ s e~tt ~r~frastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) Application completed in full. ~py of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). =.,1 -,,Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) ./ One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not . J ~ Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). f ~v~ oKS~Y Su~'Kt, . Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if agplicablel. Date of Preapplication Conference: ~~~ NAME OF SUBDIVISION ~~>~ ~S"t74~~S P~~.YP~c SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) 02210 j-~jF~it; ~f~U~~ L.~+y ~t ~~ APPLICANT/P~RaOJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name ~~ ~~ ~~__-_ Street Address o~~ I~AS' ~'-- , ~~ ~c~,6k City ~e-C.~E ~J'1 State Zip Code ~Ur'~~ E-Mail Address ~~ CS`~ ( cc.~.oo .4r'~'l. Phone Number C~~L3 "~ ~ Fax Number 3 ~- PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name ~~ ~+~ ~V STadl 2~,4,~' Z..4-~ Street Address Q-~(~D ~~ ,ri _ ~CJTI~- City ~DL~'~ ~jT~'1f1~ State Zip Code ? E-Mail Address /' Phone Number ~~D "'/~a Fax Number 1,~9l~ -' Z 5 ®`7 ARCHITEGT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name ~tty AJ tG 1-tl~ ~~~EJ~Y~,tT ( (,~ Street Address ~ State Zip Code '~ ~C • Phone Number '7 C ~ ~ `' P City ~t,LE+fi~c E-Mail Address 4k~GS'~ ~ . LoY-'l Fax Number T Q~ ''' 6/13/03 1 of 5 Is there a temporary blanket easement on this properly? If so, please provide the Volume _~`-'~~" and Page # 1~~ Acreage -Total Property ~Z. D ~°' JCL- Total # Of Lots ~7 ~ R-O-W Acreage 2 • ~ ~ ~~-~ S • Existing Use: ~'" 6R-~C.c.>(,`h:J~R-t~,t.~'' Proposed Use: ~~~ tt7~'ti~K/ Number Of Lots By Zoning District ~_ / t~-~. / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: d_~l ~`"~.. l l Floodplain Acreage '~ b~-~~.- A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): r~~ Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: f3 ~~. --_ _. Requested Oversize Partiapation: ~~'~'`j ~- ~ ~~-~- Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: 1~~~ Streets t3D Sidewalks ~ 3 ~ ~ Sanitary Sewer Lines ~5.~ Water Lines Channels ~-°~'~ Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LI ~OF LAND: ~Zv-.t~ # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ ' (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. ..,---, ~~~ 1 ~ ~ Signa and T' ~,~~~ ~~~ C, Date 6/13/03 2 of 5 • STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3 Project: HORSE HAVEN PH 3 (FP) - 04-00500283 • ENGINEERING 1. Make a note on the final plat, that there will not be any alteration to the drainage facilities, the flood plain excavation area or the detention/retention facilities, as noted in section 2.3 of the Academy drainage easement. 2. Certification to accompany the drainage report from a licensed engineer stating that the drainage plan for Horse Haven Estates will not cause any alteration to the drainage facilities, the flood plain excavation area or the detention/retention facilities, as noted in section 2.3 of the Academy drainage easement and that Academy's drainage system will continue to function as it was originally designed to function. 3. Provide a private drainage easement for the area between Horse Haven Estates to the pond. 4. Phase 3 construction document comments will follow in the next week, please contact me if you have any questions. Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: April 8, 2005 • ~onsen~ Agenda 2.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for Westfield Village Phases 1-d, consisting of 310 residential lots on 75.f51 acres generally located north of graham Road and east of Victoria. Case #05-36 (CC) • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Date: April 19, 2005 Email: mhitchcock~cstx.gov Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for Wes~eld Village Ph. 1-6, consisting of 310 residential lots on 75.651 acres generally located north of Graham Road and east of Victoria. Applicant: Randy French for BCS Development Co. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat. Item Summary: The Westfield Village Subdivision is a single family residential Planned Development District (PDD~. In 2001, when the POD was adapted, the common belief was that the property adjacent to the north would be developed as a school by the College Station Independent School District. When the school site developed, Eagle Ave. would be extended #hrough the CSISD property. For this reason, six lots in Phase S were oriented toward the north on a small, "elbow" street that would come off of Eagle Avenue. Since that time, • CSISD has relocated their planned school site and has no immediate plans for development of the tract that they own. Because there is no known time frame far the construction of Eagle on CSISD property, it is unknown when the six lots on Fallbrook Court would have proper access. For this reason, the applicant submitted a revised PDD concept plan showing all lots in Phase 5 to have access to the interior of the subdivision, where the construction of access is controlled by the developer. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The property was rezoned to a Planned Development District in December 2001 in compliance with Comprehensive Plan for the area. When Council approved the rezoning they did so with two conditions. The first condition was that at the time of platting the proposed phasing meet access requirements such that areas with more than 50 lots provide 2 access points to the existing street system and that once there are more than 250 lots there was a third access point. The second condition was that prior to the beginning of site work, the recommendations of the Greenways Program Manager for protection of the open space were followed. The plat was previously determined by P&Z to meet these requirements. The plat also approved the following modifications requested for the PDD: - SidewalkslTrail standards--in lieu of internal sidewalks, public access trails (to be maintained by the HQA) will be built throughout the project. The trails • will be a minimum of 8 feet in width. • A Minimum lot areas and dimensions, with special consideration for those Pots that are located adjacent to the floodplain or greenway areas--lots will be a minimum of the typicals, either by dimensions or area as shown on the plat. - Building setbacks- will vary depending on the typical tot. Some of the benefits of this plan include preservation of open space in prominent locations, preservation of natural resources, connectivity of natural areas within the development and to those in surrounding areas, traffic calming, and avoidance of cul-de-sacs. Item Background: A revised concept plan for the PDD was approved by the Administrator in 2005. The previous preliminary plats for this PDD subdivision were approved in 2003. Phases 1, 2, 3, and 6 have already been final platted as shown. Budgetary ~ Financial Summary: Oversize participation was requested and approved for the construction of portions of Victoria Avenue, and the Victoria and Baron waterlines. Oversized participation will be requested for the remaining section of Victoria Avenue, Eagle Avenue and the remaining section 12-inch water line along Victoria. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: Fees in lieu of land were • accepted by the Parks Board in 2001. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. infrastructure and Facilities 5. Copy of Preliminary Plat fi. Copy of Concept Plan • oa N k ,a ~ x ~ ~~ . ,. ,~~~.: s ~ ~ ~ ~, M~~tT:tr'' y~~` ~; c ~~, y f~ a t Y '\L„IF / ~ ~ ,. . " I WEILBUNN RD ,- ,;: Y`. .: + _ 1 ~ . +, ~:. ~ ' s-• ° „ „~ ., I " ^ ~ mI ~ ~ x ~ r / , ~ I _ «'~ ~ -~ ~.".~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ , l O ~. a b' / ' .. x f / ,.. \\ , i ~~ O ~ .. f,/ iii 6 ~y y N ~a ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ O Y + y ? ~ ~~ N / 'ti ~ _ a b 3 j ~ // R / \ d / ~ % ^/ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V a ~ ~, Y _ u a ~ w ~q :, ~ h ~n'~' -- i/ '~. ~ \ \ ~ ,• \ _ ~/ .. ~ ~ ~ • ; o i `: ~~~~ a. a ~ ~ \ •~"~ a _y~ ~ _ a e ~ `- o say , eo ~ ~=~ ~ ~~~ m .~` aY - .a ~y t n y Y q ".. a ~ ~ a i, a "~ y ~Fy~~ ~ x e a r c3 /\ _ ~ ,_ s ~, .. /-ice ' 3 a a _ee~ _ a 1 ~. . a a- O a ~ _ _& a 4 _ _ Vs ay • ~y _ a A ~CVRa °a A-.8 ~- S +. t - a' G4 as R K.9 k a v kVs.. 4G a D` _ _~ Y i s a ~ -_ Ma r s r as ' as a ~ `~~ 'pa ` _ yr ' V pr~~ a o _ o `a $ yY c~ ~ a _ „ s ~ ~, ~ _ ~'+~'4 4 L~~ ~ ay- _x t`~ ~' • ~ CITY OF COJ.LEGE STATION Planning cr Developmrnt Scrviccs FOR OFFICE_USE ONLY PB~Z CASE NO.: ~~ "' J`~ DATE SUBMITTED: 3 ` ~ ~ _©'_-~ PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION ~ : as ~~ The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: X Filing Fee of $400.00. N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) X Application completed in full. X Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) N/A One (1) copy of the approved Master Plan if applicable. X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. N/A Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed. N/A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks 8 Recreation Board, please provide proof of ', approval (if applicable). Date of Preapplication Conference: ~AME OF SUBDIVISION Westfield Village. Phases 1 through 6 SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION R. Stevenson League A-54 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name Randy French. Stylecraft Builders Street Address 4090 SH 6 South City _ College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 E-Mail Address rfrenchCc.~stylecraft-builders.com Phone Number 979.690.1222 x11 Fax Number 979.690.9069 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name __ BCS Development Company Street Address (Same as above) City State Phone Number Zip Code E-Mail Address Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name McClure & Browne Engineerina/Surveying, Inc • Street Address 1008 Woodcre_ek Drive. Suite 103 City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number (9791 693-3838 E-Mail Address mikem(a~mcclurebrowne.com Fax Number (979) 693-2554 6/13/03 1 of4 ' Total Acres of Subdivision 75.651 acres R-O-W Acreage 19.9 acres Total # Of Lots 310 Number of Lots by Zoning District PDD-H/ 310 .Average Acreage of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 0.15 / PDD-H Floodplain Acreage None Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? None A statement addressing any differences between the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan (if applicable) The lot configuration in Phase 5 has been re-oriented to the interior of the subdivision. This adjustment to the Plan is necessary since the construction schedule for Eagle Avenue on the School's property is uncertain Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same None Requested oversize participation None Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of Acres to be dedicated # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks 8 Recreation Board The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correcf. The undersigned hereby requesfs approval by the City of College Station of the above identified plat and attests that all respective owners have been identi#ed on this application. c Sig ture an Tit I°,coJ~7 ~~/~~ 3118/os Date ., .~ 6/ 13!03 2 of 4 • ~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning rr Development Services SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 13 FOLDED COPIES OF PLAT FOR REVIEW PRELIMINARY PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch or larger. Include the words "PRELIMINARY PLAT -NOT FOR RECORD" in letters 1/2" high. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. (~ 2. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow. 3. Title Block with the following information: © Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. Q Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos County 911.) (Replats need to retain original subdivision name.) (~ Date of preparation. (INCLUDE DATE THE PLAT WAS SUBMITTED AND THE DATES • OF ANY REVISIONS ON THE PLAT) [/]~ Engineer's scale in feet. ~' Total area intended to be developed. [~ 4. North Arrow. (~~ 5. Location of current city limit lines and current zoning district boundary. [~ 6. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. Boundary must include all of parent tract. [~' 7. Descriptions by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within accepted land survey standards. (Labeled on boundary lines, not separate metes and bounds description.) 0' 8. Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control point, to which ,later, all dimensions, angles, bearings, block numbers, and similar data shall be referred. The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the survey or tract, or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. [-~ 9. Name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous parcels of unsubdivided land, and an indication whether or not contiguous properties are platted. Q~ 10. Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and Floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available data. 11. Topographic information, including contours at two foot (2 ft.) intervals, wooded areas, and flowline elevation of streams. 6!13/03 3 of 4 Q~ 12. Proposed land uses (In compliance with Land Use Plan). 13. Proposed zoning changes, if any, submit formal rezoning request. Q~ 14. The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii; area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision). Existing Proposed ~'' [~` Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp. turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. Q' [a' Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) [~- ~ [~ Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. ~` [~ Alleys. $ $ Reserve tracts. ~~- $ Well site locations. •$ •~- Pipelines. If carrying flammable gas or fuel, also show size of line, design pressure and product transported through the line. [~-]~ [[~ Utility Services. (Water & Sanitary Sewer) All existing and proposed utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas. [Q' []~ Easements. [+~" [v]'• Drainage Structures and improvements including underground storm sewer and all • overland systems (flow line of existing watercourses) and showing where these will discharge. Proposed channel cross sections, if any. [°f Q" A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block. Q~ --{~- Greenbelt area/park linkages/parkland dedication (All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board prior to P 8~ Z Commission consideration.) [Y]om $ Public areas [v]~ ~}' Other public improvements, including but not limited to parks, schools and other public facilities [~" 15. Proposed phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements and infrastructure costs should be distributed evenly throughout the subdivision.. 16. Are there impact fees associated with this development? ^ Yes [~' No [~ 17. If requesting oversize participation items, are the necessary impact studies included? ^Yes 1Go ^N/A • 6/!3/03 4 of 4 • INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Wat®r: An 18-in waterline was constructed along Barron Road and portions of a 12" line were constructed along Victoria with Phases 1,2,3 and 6. The 12-inch line along Victoria will be extended to connect the existing sections. An 8-inch line was constructed along the future ROW of Eagle Avenue with Phase VI. This 8-inch line will be further extended with Phases 4 and 5. The new system for this area is required to meet B/CS Unified Water and Sewer Design Guidelines for domestic and fire flows. A Water Design Report for the subdivision is required at the time of Final Plat to ensure compliance. Water Service: Water to be provided to each lot, as required. Sewer: Sewer will be provided to the subdivision through the exiting system. With Phase 3 an extension was provided to the Bald Prairie Subdivision. A Sewer Report for the subdivision is required at the time of Final Plat to insure capacity and compliance with the BCS Unified Water and Sewer Design Guidelines. Sewer Service: Sewer to be provided to each lot, as required. Streets: The Developer is providing access to all lots with conventional-width streets. The streets are some-what more curvy and posted speed limits will need to reflect sight distances. Eagle Avenue is a minor collector on the City's Thoroughfare Plan and will be constructed with Phase 4 and 5. The • remaining section of Victoria Avenue, a major collector will be constructed with Phase 4. Off-site Easements: N/A Drainage: This development will need to meet the Drainage Ordinance. The detention pond on the north end of the subdivision is existing. It will need to be dedicated with the next phase. The construction of Victoria cannot cut-off upstream drainage from Bald Prairie. Flood Plain: Due to the fact that there is a stream in the subdivision and that the drainage characteristics are being changed due to development, there is the possibility of floodplain on single-family lots. Th® project engineer will need to show that homes are not inundated by the 100-yr storm. Oversize request: See Budgetary and Financial Summary Section. Impact Fees: N/A r~ U Regular Agenda 5 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Variance Request to Section 1$ of the Subdivision Regulations and public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat far the F.S. Kapchinski Subdivision, dot 12, Block 1, consisting of two lots on 0.47$ acres, located at 1612 Park Place. Case #05-26 ~P/cc~ • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Planner Report Date: April 5, 2005 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Meeting Date: April 19, 2005 Item: Presentation, discussion, and passible action on a Variance Request to Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations and public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for the F.S. Kapchinski Subdivision, Lot 12, Block 1, consisting of two lots on 0.478 acres, located at 1612 Park Place. Applicant: Ali Jaffar, agent for owner Ricky Wilborn Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Replat provided that the variance request is approved by the Commission. Item Summary: This item came before the Commission at their March 17, 2005 meeting. The variance request was tabled during the meeting because the public hearing raised questions of property ownership. Since the variance request was tabled, no action could be taken on the Replat. The applicant has obtained a title report that shows title in the name of Ricky Wilborn. Staff has • contacted the citizens that spoke at the previous meeting regarding this issue. A variance has been requested to Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations, Platting and Replatting in Older Residential Subdivisions. The regulations require that specific criteria be met if a replat creates a new lot in a subdivision that was created prior to July 15, 1970. All lots shown on the replat must meet the following criteria: • Meet or exceed the average width of the lots in the block • Contain at least 8,500 square feet of area The proposed lots exceed the 8,500 square foot minimum cited above. According to the applicant, the average width of the lots in the block has been determined to be 59.16 feet. The Applicant is seeking to plat two lots, each with a width of 52.2 feet. A variance has been requested to the width of the lots (see Section 5 Variances included below and supporting variance information with the application). The newly created lots would exceed the required 50 foot minimum lot width for the zoning of this property, which is R-1 Single-Family Residential. A home exists on the property and would not encroach into setbacks created by the new property lines. Prior to the adoption of Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations, numerous • properties in the area were resubdivided. Since Section 18 was adopted in • 2002, there have been two other variance requests to this ordinance in the F.S. Kapchinski Subdivision and both have been granted. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: This area is designated as Single- Family Residential, High Density on the Land Use Plan (7-9 dwelling units per acre}. The variance is in compliance with the Land Use Plan. Since one lot already exists, Parkland Dedication will be due on the one newly created lot prior to filing the plat. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the final plat. The Commission must first rule on the variance request which must first be taken off of the table. The options regarding the variance request are: ^ Approval ^ Denial If approved, the Commission can take action on the plat. The options regarding the final plat are: ^ Approval ^ Denial Supporting Materials: • 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application & supporting information 4. Subdivision Regulations Section 5: Variances 5. Copy of Final Plat NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication: The Eagle; 4-2-05 Advertised Commission Hearing Date: 4-19-05 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 24 Response Received: None as of date of staff report. r~ U ,; o` ~~: ~ ~ L, .,\ ~ `` /~`\ ~. \\\ i y lei \ ti ~., _. -~ _. C~' n~ 4 ~ ,. N n, ~ < ., ~ ~ ~ ~ cam, ~ / ~ ^.~ VAS-'' ~ iy~ ~~'~ r~ - - ~~.; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ __ - X~ mow. / ~ ° ,~ 9~ ~~ 1~ p ~c`~' ! ~ I ~"; "sq, 6 ~ - , /_ ?~ ,~, , ~`. ~., ~ ~ ' \ ii, ~'~ ~ ~ vat _-.. _~ ~~~ ~ ~_ ~. / ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~, p~ c~~ _~~~ c; ~ ti ~ m ~~~? V~~., c.~y k n d~~ _ 4 wd ~ ~ j r' Cri ~ __ ~ __ ~ C 4' CUB. C'~ "tl .. Ir ~X' ~ ~.,, V / ~~ a r"~~ v I ~ / `~~ / ~ ~ - - % ~~ ~ ~, ~ qpt c/' 'S/ / / // / ' ~ ~~, .y n? ~ ~ / Q) ~ , ~ Qt c ,,, i ~6c ~ /~ ~ ~ ~ / // 1~. 1 h~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ! ^J 'v ~ b _. ~~ c ~ ~ ~ O c„ aU ( ~ ~tiq ~ ~ ~~ ! ~ 4 s+-~ ~ r ~, ; _ ~ ~ ,tip. . ` v O ` ~ r~ 7 s ~ ga C'r ' ,,, y ~. a~~` ` ~' r .~ ° L ^ _, ~:. Lai ~~ ' ;c" ~ ~v, ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ , W ~ cn - ~ `: ) ' o ~ ~"' ~_' ~ ~• ~o o ~ . l ,r~1 "' ~, ~ o,~ on ~-- ~ y ~~ o o~` ~~ ~ ~/ ~ ~~ =-o a ;;: ~ ~ ~ ~ \c~b a yo .. r 4ci /i ~! i ~ ~~..._I~T ` ~~ A ~. ~ ~ i ~~`-Z 4~ _a ~ _ c~,: .~. TY OF CoI;.I,IGi; STATIt~N Plrtnnirrg cr Development Services ~3d FOIL OFFICE USE ONLY P8Z CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: ~ .~ FfNAL PLAT APPLICATION {Check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending ^ Final ^ Vacating (~Replat {~ao.ooy (saoo.ooy (snoo.ooy (;aoo.ooy (ssoo.ooy 'Includes public hearing fee The fallowing items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Filing Fee {see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed). Application completed in full. N~ Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. {A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.} One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). ' ~/, Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ~ A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of Date of Preapplication Conference: ~~ C~Y1~ NAME OF SUBDIVISION SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) ~ ~ t% f ~ ? ~ f ~ APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (P 'mary Contact for the Project): Name ~ ~-. .---,. ~ ~ ,~ V c-~ Street Address City State Zip Cade Phone Number PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name Street Address vZ- S ~~ (.v-CS ~ w G~ q State ~ Zip Code Phone Number _ Z~ ~° ~c ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMA~ Name ~, c/ (e- ~~ • Street Address /~ e ~ V State ~~ Zip Code 1 ~ g~ E-Mail Address Fax Number /~'LC.i,/t City ~Sl - _ E-Mail Address ~.. ~ ,('~ /C S c` ~'c ),-~/C~~s..C~ Fax Number ~~.~ ~, ,~ City -~ E-Mail Address 1.4 Lprr{tt~,a~no ~ ur'~sv%vty, Co~+, T--,~ Phone Number ~ ~ ~ °'~ ~ ~ ~ Fax Number ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~' Is there a temporary blanket easement an this property? If so; please provide the Volume and Page # creage ~ Total Property ~' „_~!~~ ~, Total # Of Lots R-O-W Acreage ~isting Use: ~ ~ ~ i.. ~~ f,/~, ~~ fir, ~ ~ Proposed Use: Number Of Lots By Zoning District / ! / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: Floodpiain Acreage A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations i3< Reason For Same: .~` ~: r',, ~~1(,;X'~,Q.[~ ~~,~~y1 Requested Oversize Participation: Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: Streets Sidewalks Sanitary Sewer Lines Water Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodpiain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 =$ (date) Approved by Parks 8~ Recreation Board NOTE; DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. nature and Title Date 02/25/2005 16:13 FAX 9797752873 CARLOMAGNO SiIRVEYING f7J002 -- -- • 1)trrrte Car•lomrr~no P r'esid orr t ___ 2714 Finfeather Bryan, TX 77:301 Fhone (979) 77S -2873 Fax (979) 77S -4787 To: City of College St~ition Planning and Development EmaB - CS~Carioma~gnoSwveying.com www. CarlomagnoStuvey~ng.com ~~ We are requesting a variance for lot width for a replat of Lot 12 in the Kapchinski Subdivision where the average lot width is 59.16 feet wide. The width of lots 12A and 12B once replatted will be 52.2 feet wide Thank yau, .----- Dante Carlomagno • Texas Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 1 S~i2 Thursday, February 24, 2005 1 • 0L/24/L005 15:41 FAX 9797752873 CARL.OMAGNU SURVEYING Carlomagno Surveying Inc. 2714 Pinfeather • Bryan TX 77801 LOT WIDTH DETERIJIINATION Lot # Block Lot Width Lot # Block Lot Width 1 A 1 52.34 1 B 1 52.32 14-R-1 1 52.13 2A 1 52.32 14 1 52.20 2B 1 52.32 15R1 1 72.41 3A 1 52.32 15R2 1 60.00 5A 1 52.75 15R3 1 75.92 5B 1 52.75 23 1 57.50 6A 1 42.00 24 1 54.50 6 B 1 42.00 25 1 54.50 9R 1 57.35 26 1 70.23 10R 1 57.35 27 1 119.00 7R 1 50.00 16A1 2 132.00 8R 1 50.00 16A2 2 32.00 19R 1 42.00 16B 2 80.00 17 1 101.00 15 2 80.00 18A 1 52.20 14 2 80.00 18B 1 52.20 13 2 80.00 11 A 1 52.20 12 2 75.90 11 B 1 52.20 11 2 45.00 12A 1 52.20 10 2 45.00 12B 1 52.10 9 2 45.00 • 13 1 52.00 Total 1121.58 Total 1363.29 2484.87 =Combined Total Average = 59.16 Dante Carlomagno Texas Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 1562 (979)775-2873 (979)775-4787 Fax [1j 002 • • F.S. Kapchinski Replat -Variance Information Please note that we will like you to take the following points into consideration for our variance request on 1612 Park Place Replat. The commission has approved several variances in the area which has greatly enhanced the overall neighborhood. Without subdividing the property we will not be able to redevelop this lot. Additionally 32 out of the 43 lots in that area are currently below the average lot width with only 11 lots significantly affecting the overall average width. Thank you, Sincerely, Ali ]affar • • • SECTION 5: VARIANCES 5_A The Commission may authorize a variance from the regulation when, in their opinion, undue hardship will result from requiring strict compliance. In granting a variance, the Commission shall prescribe only conditions that it deems not prejudicial to the public interest. In making the findings herein before required, the Commission shall take into account the nature of the proposed use of the land involved, the existing use of land in the vicinity, the number of persons who will reside or work in the proposed subdivision, the possibility that a nuisance will be created, and the probable effect of such variance upon traffic conditions and upon public health, convenience, and welfare of the vicinity. No variance shall be granted unless the Commission finds: 5-A.1 That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; 5-A.2 That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; 5-A.3 That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to • the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and 5-A.4 That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. 5-B Such findings of the Commission, together with the specific facts upon which such findings are based, shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the meetings at which such variance is granted. Variances may be granted only when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter so that public health, safety, and welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. • Regular Agenda 6 Fublic hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Lot 1A, Lot 16, and the southeast 25 feet of Lot 15, College Heights Block D, generally located at the intersection of University Drive and Macarthur Street, and north of the intersection of University Drive and Nimitz Street, from PDD Planned Development District, A-P Administrative Professional and R~2 Duplex Residential to P-MUD Planned Mixed Use District. Case ##45-3? ~JF~ • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Planner Report Date: April 5, 2005 Email: jprochazka at7cstx.gov Meeting Date: April 19, 2005 Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Lot 1A, Lot 16, and the southeast 25 feet of Lot 15, College Heights Block D, generally located at the intersection of University Drive and Macarthur Street, and north of the intersection of University Drive and Nimitz Street, from PDD Planned Development District, A-P Administrative Professional and R-2 Duplex Residential to P-MUD Planned Mixed Use District. Applicant: Benjamin Knox, owner of Lot 1A, and agent for Richard Zgaby, owner of Lot 16 and the southeast 25 feet of Lot 15. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the P-MUD zoning. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting rezoning in order to continue development of the Benjamin Knox Gallery. The proposal includes a mix of uses on the properties including, an art gallery and associated storage, specialty retail, limited restaurant, studio space, and living quarters. P-MUD zoning requires that • both the residential component and non-residential component makes up at least 20 percent of the overall land uses within the development. Compliance with this requirement will be determined at the time of Concept Plan approval. The property to the south is zoned C-3 Light Commercial and developed as Montelongo's Jewelry. The properties located to the north are zoned R-2 Duplex Residential and developed as a duplex and a single family home. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates this property and the surrounding area as Redevelopment. The Comprehensive Plan recommends that redevelopment occur as mixed use developments for areas in close proximity to the University. The approved Concept Plan must be sensitive to the existing housing in the area. University Drive is a major arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. Macarthur Street and Nimitz Street are both local streets. Item Background: The properties were annexed into the City in 1951. The College Heights area was platted as a residential subdivision prior to annexation. This area was originally zoned for single family use. Over time, the lots fronting on University Drive became commercial, larger lots became general commercial and smaller lots became less intense commercial districts. The subject property • was rezoned A-P and R-2 many years ago to allow for redevelopment to a higher density residential and to allow limited commercial uses. Lot 1A was again • rezoned in 2000 to PDD-B for The Benjamin Knox Gallery. In 2003 Lot 1A was rezoned to amend the approved concept plan and other PDD elements. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: AConcept Plan is required to be approved by the Design Review Board prior to development of this property. The Design Review Board has final authority on the Concept Plan. Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval, 2. Recommend denial, 3. Table indefinitely, or 4. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Infrastructure and Facilities C7 • __ ,, __~ j ; '~~ :~ ; ~ j ,. _. ,r N ~~ i t,, ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~_ 8 ~C ,„ <,. -,Y _ ~?. X~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ {. __ o ~ / ~ ,.1. ~ ~ ~_.~ ~/ ~ ~~, ~ ~ ~ i / „ i LLL d ~ ~~ / < ~. ~ A C / i i ~ ~ , ~.~ ~ ~ ,,. ~ i ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,. ~~..,, i ~ ~ V~' - ~ ,. r~ 7 \ T I ~ '~~ L. / 1 ,- _a ~~ ~~ L, ~ / ~ / ~ ~~ 1 vx~ rT ~ ~, ` ~ ~ ~~ - ~ r~ j ~ ~~ ~~ _ ~i~, ~ / r ~ ~r ~ ~ _\~ ~~ O ~ JJ _, ~ ~ L~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ -~~ G ~01 ~~ -.~ ~~°o ~ ~ ' ~~~~ [~1 ~' v c ~~ 06 Q'O <~, ~ `~,' C~ ~O / ~~. `moo y ~ ~~/ ,~ r 09 ~ ~ ~_„ X06, S~. `~' '~, 1 ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~, ~~ ~j sr O O~ ~ ~ ~ ~j~ ~U6' ~ ~~ ~ z C~ ~~ ~1J o> ~~~ \~'~ i ~./ s°-' © O ~ L~~~ ~ ~ • CITY O~ CoI.L>EGI7 STATIC?N I'laxxir~ d fkr~r/npme,rr Seriirrr ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission or City~Council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: VV Application completed in full. ,$500.00 application fee _/ Two.(2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and ~ e. All public and private rights-of--way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot 8~ block of subdivision, whichever is J applicable). The Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. A CAD (dxf/dwg) or GIS (shp) digital file may be required for more complex rezoning requests. Date of Required Preapplication Conference: ' ~ ~~~ FOR OFFICE SE ONLY CASE NO. ~~ J ~~ ..DATE SUBMITTED ~ D APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: • Name .$L N IN ICNDX ~ ~'•IGNAR,p Z6tA8Y Street Address ~ R• ~ ~'~ ~ NIM 1 TZ. City GOb1.E~E..~`('R7'~ State ~~ _.__ Zip Code 77$ E-Mail Address Phone Number ~' ~-.~~.j~Fax Number _ ~j'7~1- 6q1- Z7$~ PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: ~~~'~-~~ Page ~~ of the Brazos County Deed Records. General Location of Property: GDI~t.~liE ,}IE1l~TS Bl~c>,tJC D NEItR VNIvF,Rsm,~ AND TEXAS IN~kJII Address of Property:~~NIV6RS1T1DM1~ BAST ~ 411 1J1M1TZ Go1~~iE_ 57A710n1. ~'~t. "?"l~fl Name l~ 1 v R. KIGH Street Address f . ~' IM-fTL`r'ty („o1a,~ Sti4T1i~1, '1'x. State "j'~_Zip Code "T7$4'Q E-Mail Address ~e~n~R.knp~C (a yah~n, ~,~v Phone Number ~j-??A- 3 t2.. '7~ ax Number ~iAI •L7~ _ This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated ~VGVS'I' 30 ~n and recorded in Volume Jr~Jr , Legal Description: Acreage -Total Property: Existing Zoning: ~ I A~~~„ Proposed Zoning:__ pMVD .Present Use of Property:__MhLIEQ y6E.- ~IL~i~S~-UR nrT_I-pD ~ RLS1~l~ITIAI~ Proposed Use of Property: tMVD • ~T~Irtl,~,~ ~~,'t~11~'tT~~~SIDI~~JT1~4L~ST1/D101 6/13/03 Page 1 of 2 REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION • 1.) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. TNiS ~R.~ t5 ~/,/RNNEj? fOR. RED~1/~t~.OP/-'1C-N7. Y 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. TN15 ZoN~ GHANi,E ~5 IN ,AGI.ORDA+yf.~ In/ITH 7'~la~ COMP1LE~leN.Sl~. ~_A.N, • 3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change. IT ~~~~,. IN~~E TiiE >~RTS ~14WV GtlLTUR/1~ >A~SpEtTS /N ~•o ~t ~L ~,A~T~p~1., ~T~u1~, ~N~~~. ~E y~t~ u~'OF -~+t~ l~1F.JI,~it~.l~tev~..Q~,~L E~~~ YAK ~N ca~t.~aF Slr~r~.N. iT WlI.L FNI4E1~ ME. Tp $VtLD MY STVIt'ID NEXT Tj'j THL` G>~Ltr.R.y, The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certif<es that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. 6/13103 bate Page 2 of 2 • INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: There are two 6" waterlines that exist in Macarthur and Nimitz that are adequate to serve the proposed development. Sewer: There is a 6" sewerline in Nimitz and a 6" sewerline that exists along University Drive with adequate capacity to serve the proposed development. Streets: University Drive is a major arterial and the two side streets are residential streets. There is currently a platted but undeveloped alley that exists between and parallel to Macarthur and Nimitz that will need to be abandoned to facilitate the proposed development. Off-site Easements: None proposed at this time. Current City policy is to require abandonments of entire alleyways rather than sections of one. Drainage: Will be required to meet drainage ordinance with the site plan submittal. Flood Plain: None on site. Oversize request: None at this time. Impact Fees: None in this area. • NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 4-2-05 and 4-25-05 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 4-19-05 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 5-12-05 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 20 Response Received: None as of date of staff report • Regular Agenda 7 Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and passible action on a Conditional Use Permit for a Night Club, located in Suite D at 2551 Texas Avenue South in the ~-Iom.estead Place Shoppiarig Center. Case #05-~-9 ALB/MH) • • • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Lindsay Boyer Report Date: April 7, 2005 Email: Iboyer@cstx.gov PAZ Meeting Date: April 19, 2005 Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit for a Night Club, located in Suite D at 2551 Texas Avenue South in the Homestead Place Shopping Center (05-39). Applicant: Ibtissam Haj-Ali, applicant for Hookah Station Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval; however, the public hearing may bring forth additional information regarding potential impacts that may be associated with the proposed use. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to open a nightclub with limited food service in a vacant lease space in the Homestead Place Shopping Center on Texas Avenue. The proposal includes a 2,000 square foot nightclub to be located in an existing vacant lease space. The proposed hours of operation are 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Sunday through Wednesday, and 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., Thursday through Saturday. The total allowed occupancy for the lease space is 80 persons, and an expected employment of 10 people. The property currently has 108 parking spaces on site. The land plan report for the widening of Texas Avenue indicates that the property will lose 17 spaces with the widening of Texas Avenue, leaving 91 spaces. According to the UDO, the required number of spaces for a shopping center of this size, if developed today, would be 123 parking spaces. However, shopping centers are permitted to have a maximum of 25% of intense uses, including restaurants, coffee shops, nightclubs, and theatres, without additional parking being provided. Currently, the only other intense use is the Kindermusik music school in Suite F. With the addition of Hookah Station, the proportion of intense use in the shopping center would increase from 4% to 10°l0. Although the shopping center has limited parking, the other uses in the center have peak hours that differ from the proposed nightclub. A number of the tenants are offices and personal service retail with operating hours during standard business hours. The center is located adjacent to Park Place Plaza Shopping Center and the Oak Forest Manufactured Home Park. The distance between the back of building and the nearest single-family residence is 145-feet. The use would also be located approximately 400-feet north of College Station Baptist Church. Created on 4/7/2005 1:58 PM ~ P:IGROUPIDevelopment ServiceslP/anning & Zoning CommissionlLegal Review 20051April 191Hookah Station CUP.DOC • Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates this area as Retail Regional and Texas Avenue is a major arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. The property is zoned C-1 General Commercial. The property is surrounded by C-1 to the north and south, R-4 developed as a manufactured home park to the east, and Texas Avenue to the west. Item Background: The property is currently platted. The Homestead Place Shopping Center was developed in the mid 1980's. The property was originally annexed in 1969, and has been designated C-1 prior to 1975. The property is located within the Krenek Tap Overlay which was applied in 2004. Staff Analysis: Article 3, Section 13 of the Unified Development Ordinance authorizes the existence of conditional uses. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council to approve an application for a conditional use permit where it reasonably determines that there will be no significant negative impact upon residents of surrounding property or upon the general public. The City Council may permit a conditional use subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards, when after public notice and hearing the Council finds that: (Staff comments are in italics) 1. "The proposed use shall meet the purpose and intent of this UDO and the • use shall meet all the minimum standards established in this UDO for this type of use. • Staff conducted a technical review and found general compliance with development regulations regarding the use, parking, and distance from incompatible uses. 2. "The proposed use shall be consistent with the development policies and goals and objectives as embodied in the Comprehensive Plan for development of the City. • The request is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. "The proposed use shall not be detrimental to the health, welfare, or safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants, nor be substantially or permanently injurious to neighboring property. • The public hearing is an opportunity for the Commission to measure the potential impact on surrounding land uses. • Created on 4/7/20051:58 PM 2 P:IGROUPIDevelopment ServiceslPlanning & Zoning Commissionl!_egal Review 20051April 191Hookah Station CUP. DOC 4. "The proposed site plan and circulation plan shall be harmonious with the • character of the surrounding area. The proposed use is located in an existing commercial center with an approved site plan. 5. "The proposed use shall not negatively impact existing uses in the area or in the City through impacts on public infrastructure such as roads, parking facilities, electrical, or water and sewer systems, or on public services such as police and fire protection, solid waste collection, or the ability of existing infrastructure and services to adequately provide services. The proposed site would not affect existing infrastructure. Although parking is limited, the center does not have more than 25% intense use, and additional parking is not required. 6. "The proposed use shall nat negatively impact existing uses in the area or in the City. • At this time, there are no known negative impacts on existing uses associated with the proposed use. The public hearing is an opportunity to gauge the impact this use would have on the surrounding area. • The City Council may impose additional reasonable restrictions or conditions to carry out the spirit and intent of this UDO and to mitigate adverse effects of the proposed use. These requirements may include, but are not limited to, increased open space, loading and parking requirements, additional landscaping, and additional improvements such as curbing, utilities, drainage facilities, sidewalks, and screening." Related Advisory Board Recommendations: N/A Commission Action Options: The Commission is a recommending body on the question of Conditional Use Permit. The options regarding the use permit are: 1. Approval; 2. Approval with conditions to mitigate adverse impacts relating to specific site characteristics or with time limitations; 3. Denial; 4. Table; or, 5. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map • 2. Aerial 3. Application Created on 4/7J2005 1:58 PM 3 P:IGROUPIDevelopment ServiceslPlanning & Zoning CommissionlLegal Review 20051April 191Hookah Station CUP.DOC NOTIFICATION: • Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 04-01-05 and 4-29-05 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 04-19-05 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 05-15-05 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 11 Response Received: None as of date of staff report • • Created on 4/7/2005 7:58 PM 4 P:IGROUP1Developmenf ServiceslPlanning & Zoning CommissionlLegal Review 20051April 191Hookah Station CUP.DOC ~rV ld/~ Q`~ ~ r v ~ ~ v ~ SoGT tii ~OC1"a L--7 y~'~s y~ ^ _ _i ~~~ ~ ~ ~ O \ ~ O ~ ~ / o ~ ~~ti f ru n V .`~~ v '% -~ l~° so Gay ?o~ ~~sT A~~~ Ix 0 °z O W `O - 1 V rti Q~' t9t">(~ OH ~a+~y orti .~~a ~ \ ti ~ b` ti ~ d~ ~~ ~ ti~ I i -A o O try- ~ti ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ • . - ~' . v 10C,~ ~ ~ -A s ~ ' ~ ~ -. As ~ co "l . ~ ~:V~:~:~:~. . :~ 0 ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :~: : ~ ~ Gnu .:.: ? .: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~. :::::::::;::::. :. .o i • CITY OF C;OLI.EGE $TATI N 0 /+/anniras d lhwelajrnrnr SrraFrt 1 ~~~ .1"' FOR OFF~_IC~•USE O_ NUY ~~ CASE NO. ~_ ..~~stZt~_19____ ''~~// __ DATE SUBMITTED i~/~~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Night Club Minimum Requirements ~~ $300.00 application, processing, and notification fee: r --~ $200.00 site plan review fee (includes 3 staff reviews). $200.00 Development Permit Application Fee if applicable. $600.00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable. (This fee is payable if construction of a ~" ~ public waterline, sewerline, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved.) ~',~.:-~ Ten (10) copies of site plan which includes requirements for site plan proposals as listed on attached ~{ sheet. This site plan will be reviewed by Staff, after which ten (10) copies of revised site plan may be ~Cl~required. ~Ir SI ~ ~ ~i..i,~ b t/~ o { ~ ~ ~ p pt ~ ~'~~r?.+~` betailed explanation of roposed use including hours of operation, anticipated traffic, number of employees, total building capacity, etc., as applicable. A certified copy of the Assumed Name Certificate i'fled in compliance with the Assumed Business or Professional Name Act (Texas Revised Civil Statutes, Annotated Business and Commerce Code, Chapter 36), if the applicant is to operate a sexually oriented enterprise under assumed name. Date of Required Pre tapplication Conference: NAME OF PROJECT 1""~ C w..~,.~? S ~ ~c~. ~' ~~ K. c.. ADDRESS a. k~ 1 ~~. ~,[. ~ ,S ~t Cam' ~- LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPLICANT (Primary Contact for the Name ~b~~ 5Sc~~ ~~ Street Address ~1~~~r ~ ~ ~~ CIty C~l~ r-f? . ~Cf~~'-~ ~ Stat@ ~'1C Zip Code , E-Mail Address ~"_. .~ S ~ nl Phone Number ~~7~,,} 571/_ ~ ~'c~ © Fax Number ~~~~ ?~'.S-.. ~' 2 7 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: `` )t Name ~(? ~~~ ~~~~, `. 1.~--,. ~L- ~"~r,~rSh, Street Address ~- ~ Ct ~ j C-? 1~ ~ ~~ Q' .~ r~ t+v ~ ~ ~ ~..' ~ ~ ~l1 r~~u 5`" y rf ,5"' City ,~ ~ r, State ~~~,C Zip Code 1 ''"L ~ © C"" E-Mail Addre Phone Number '~ / y - L ~[ `l` -- Number y'/ y~- Sf~ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: lF q 5`'-~. ~ Cp Name ~' ~~ Street Address City State Zip Code E-Mail Address • Phone Number ill ~-~"' ax Number 6/13/03 1 of 3 • OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of conta i.e. project manager, potenti ,buyer, to I contact, etc.) Name ~~ee ~~_ fir, ~ ~ ~~_4~-Ct ,~~ F'~. Street Address ~} ~ ~ 4 City '~ _ r State .~ ti,.r" Zip Code ~ '-1 ~~~ ~~ E-Mail Address t ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C- ~ ~'~--- ll__ Phone Number ~ ~7'~- ~ jB - ~ `7 11 C.,r Fax Number ~ 1 '- ~.G' S` ~- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY ~~ c c~ .... ~ C~ ~-~ ~, S""~, v r~..,`~r. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY 1t~'~' Q It f C (L,~,~i _~ CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY ~ ~ Total Acreage ~- ~ ~ Building Sq. Ft. t.'y..l~~t ~ Floodplain Acreage __7~_ t, E_ec ~ ~. 5~.. e ~ .: chi to r.~ C%1y~ i~`~•-- VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S) AI t'> r~, -[~ NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED _ NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED l ~ C~~_ APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE WITHOUT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION • ADDRESSED: State how the following issues will be addressed: 1. Indicate how this use and site plan will not be detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding neighborhood, by answering the following: b. The College Station Codes limit noise levels to 65 d.b.a. from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. and to 55 d.b.a. from 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. Estimate the noise levels produced from the proposed use as heard from all orooerty lines. • 6/13/03 2 of 3 a. Approximate the distance to the nearest residential area and indicate the housing type (single family, duplex, multi-family, etc.} c. Approximate the distance to the nearest church, school, or hospital. These measurements must be taken from front door, along property lines, to front door. • d. Describe the proposed activities and entertainment attractions. e. Indicate whether or not the parking lot will be altered to discourage the following: (circle yes or no for each) yes r'~o`~ Trespassing on adjoining properties yes ~ Littering yes "n Night noise from patrons leaving the night club yes no Loitering ,~ I verify that all of the information contained in this application is true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. • ~~ ignature of Owner, Y • ~ G~.-~"' 'Date 6/13/03 3 of 3 Lack`s ~` ! ~~ ~ ~- N TEX,~.S ALYE ~ ~---~---'.~ r~ ---~ S ., ~. • ~, I { :y • k i ~_ ! ~ ~p~ 1, f 5~ sf ~' 1~~ ._ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~L 1,3nt1 sf 1 ...~..~ ~a Susa ---,.a.~ ' ;~~" s s ~ + ~ ~ ~ 2551 TEXAS `:~'~ ~~LTI~ - HO'~STEa~ PL..GE ' ~.S" "T ~_ ~ ~,._ _"~ ~- . t .~~......,..~. ..~...,.,....a........._.._--- -~-- ~ l '. r`"~ j 55~ :~^XAS ,.''~ "^" .. - ?-f''`'s.'T~E'r_~ r~:?C~:, ~E 1 ~ i i ; ~ .~ I ~ ~ ~ i ~ `-f~~r;~ca'e E~ati~id Aiexa~;der '.~. =4'::;,LgS X79-764-7768 "°:'a~, 'x 7 ~ ~c5 (A. R.A. S~'?:LC:_i PLACE, PHASE TT` PHASE. TT ~= 2551 TEXAS AirE. ; SCl7"": • • s j. / !, ~ ~ ` ~~• i ~ ,, w.l ~ ~~ ~ 5 Uti _ _ _ d ,'j L -`-~; _" : ~ ~; I .~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ 1 s: E ~i ~., v~._ Xy~.~„W_.. ~~ !, {~ i ~~ Ent?~y r' ~+ =1 3'• i~ is _~~~_~ L.___._.._..~' 251-~ T~AAS ~'~E, 5~~~1TH ~®~~EC~~ ~T~:T~G~! T -~~8~ .~_ ~#C- S.i~. .7 i• • i ~ Ch. ~._ b 1' ~sl}SSS ~ t V~-SS 'G ~~C> K~t~~ S ''i-~~ U (t ~~~'" ~~ erv~~p I~ es ~ ~C.~ ~~ 1 ~ ~f~ •.(\,~ ~ t~ - , '~!*. ~CX~ `j'Ct vl /~~- ,~X~ t! W) ter. / A(1U •