Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/17/2005 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionPILE COPY • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PJamiing cf Ikorlopme-u Seniars AGENDA Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, March 17, 2005, 6:30 p.m. Administrarive Conference Room, City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 2. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff. None 3. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and • Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy map be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 4. Adjourn ~onanl_ta±+on with tarn j~,~'t -~~ motion x.071} ; nor.~+ble scdon~ The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice txvm its attorney regarding a pending and contiemplated litigation subject or attorneq-client privileged informatioa. After executive session discussion, any fiaa! actioa or vote taken will be in pubfic. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, as executive session will be held. This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request 5or sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements tali 979-7G4-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website ~://wvvvv7cslx.~v and Cable Access Channel 19. C7 • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION n~~=~ r~n~p~„:sue AMENDED AGENDA Regular Meeting Flanning and Zoning Commission Thursday, March 17, 2005, 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. ~,egr ~itizenae. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to took into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) • All matters listed under item 2, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion These items include preliminary and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations All items approved by Consent are approved with airy and all sta„~`'recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items If arty Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it wilt be moved to the Regutar Agenda for further consideration. 2. ~ogsen~Aaenda. 2.1 Consideration, discussion and possible action on meeting minutes for: March 3, 2005, Workshop Meeting Minutes March 3, 2005, Regular Meeting Minutes R~ula~,As,_,_enda. 3. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. o Scott Shafer -March 17, 2005, Meeting o John Nichols -March 17, 2005, Meeting • 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 3. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning for Callaway Subdivision, Phase Ii, consisting of 14 acres, located on the east side of Marion Pugh • Drive approximately 500' south of the intersection of George Bush Drive, includingg a portion of the Luther Street Right-of--Way, from C-1 General Commercial to R-6 High Density Multi-Family. Case #04-28 (JP) 6. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit - Use & Site for a Steatth Telecommunications Tower consisting of approximatly 3.175 acres at 903 Krenek Tap, generally located on the north side of Krenek Tap Road just east of Dartmouth Drive. Case #04-I88 (JR) 7. Public hearing, presentation, consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Variance from Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations for Lots 12A and 12B and public hearing, consideration, discussion and possible action on a Replat for the F.S. Kapchinski Subdivision, Lot 12, Block 1, consisting of two lots on 0.478 acres, located at 1612 Park Place. Case #05-21 (JP/CC) 8. Public hearing, presentation, consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Variance from Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations for Lots 62 A and B and 63 A and B and public hearing, consideration, discussion and possible action on a Replat for Richards Subdivision Lots 61, 62, and a portion of 63 consisting of five lots on 0.845 acres generally located on the south side of Sterling Street near its irnersection with Crest Street. Case #05-26 (MH/CC) 9. Public hearing, presentation, consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat • and Replat of the University Town Center Subdivision consisting of 4 lots on 20.02 acres generally located south of the intersection of University Drive and Tarrow Drive East. Case #04-269 (JR/AG) 10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda far a subsequent meeting. 11. Adjourn. CohaulFatie' n witfii ~,,1LCY ~~~~t ~'r~e ~"t~+ R ~ a~i~ . At~1!{1lls~tb~s The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attomay regarding a pending and contemplated Iltlgetion subject or ettomey-client privileged information. After executive session discusalon, any final adlon or vote taken will be in public. If iktgation or attorney-client. privileged Informaflon Issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning •nd Zoning Commission mseiing, an executive session will be held. This building Is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spans era available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. 7o make arrangements call 9751-764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas posted on intemet Websits .aov and Cable Access Channel 19 • MINUTES • CITY 4F COLLEGE STATION P/ameing d.aruelopmcnr Serviar Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, March 3, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. Administrative Conference Room College Station City Hail 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Nichols, Hooton, Reynolds and Chairman Shafer. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner White. CITY COITNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Maloney. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Prachazka, Reeves, Boyer, Transportation Planner Fogle, Senior Planner Fletcher, Graduate Civil Engineer Norton, Senior Assistant City Engineer Gibbs, Staff Assistant Lindgren. • OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: First Assistant City Attorney Nemcik and Director of Public Works Smith. 1. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. Commissioner Davis stated he would like to discuss The Glade, item 8, and asked for clarification on how many times it had been to the Commission. Prochazka, Staff Planner, stated that it was the second time the project had been to the Commission. Commissioner Davis also asked for clarification on the Iot size. Prochazka explained that the lots are comparable in size to the adjacent lots on Laura Lane. The issue of the removal of the wall existing on the property was discussed, along with traffic issues. Fogle, Traffic Planner, presented statistics on traffic and the impact it may or may not have if the project is approved. Chairman Shafer also asked for clarification regarding the obligation Commissioners have to approve the preliminary plat. Nemcik gave instruction on the matter and it was discussed further. Chairman Shafer asked for clarification regarding the buffer on the Pebble Creek project, item 7. Fletcher, Senior Planner, gave clarification on the matter and referred to the zoning survey map submitted by the applicant where a 45 foot buffer was shown. Commissioner Fedora asked for clarification regarding the rezoning of Spring Loop, item 6. Fletcher gave clarification on the matter. C, P$tZ Workshop Minutes March 3, 2005 Page 1 of 2 2. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff • No items were discussed. 3. Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding the status of the draft Subdivision Regulations. Mark Smith, Director of Public Works gave a presentation regarding the status of the draft Subdivision Regulations. Mr. Smith also suggested that he be added as a standing item on future workshop agendas in order to give more detailed information on specific issues of interest by the Commission. 4. Discussion and possible action regarding the numbering of positions on the Planning and Zoning Commission for purposes of recordkeeping in accordance with the P&2 Rules of Procedure There was discussion on a roster of Commissioners. Commissioners agreed for staff to number them 1 through 7, using the roster and going down the line. 5. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice bas not been given. A statement of specific factual informadon or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Nichols commented that his interest is in Public Financing. He stated that he would be interested in this topic from a planning point of view. • 6. Ad'ourn 1 Commissioner Davis motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Fedora seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant • Planning and Development Services P&Z Workshop Minutes March 3, 2005 Page 2 of 2 MINUTES Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission • Thursday, March 3, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Plamiing dDevelopnunt Strrrica • COMMISSIONERS PRESENT; Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Nichols, Hooton, Reynolds and Chairman Shafer. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner White. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: None. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Prochazka, Reeves, Boyer, Transportation Planner Fogle, Senior Planner Fletcher, Graduate Civil Engineer Norton, Senior Assistant City Engineer Gibbs, Building Offscial Simms, Staff Assistants Grace and Lindgren. OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: First Assistant City Attorney Nemcik and Kim Voitier, OTIS. 1. Hear Visitors No Visitors spoke. 2. Consent Agenda. 2.1 Consideration, discussion and possible action on meeting minutes: Thursday, March 3, 2005 -Workshop Minutes Thursday, March 3, 2005 -Regular Minutes Commissioner Davis motioned to approve all minutes as presented. Commissioner Reynolds seconded the motion, motion passed (6r~0). • P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda March 3, 2005 Page i of 8 Regular A nda. • 3. Consideration, discussion aad possible action on nest(s) for absence from req meetings. Ben White -March 3, 2x05, Meeting Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the absence request. Commissioner Hooton seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. No items were discussed. 5. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action an a Rezoning from A- O Agricultural Open to R 1 Single Family of a portion of Renee Lane RO.W. and for tots 4 and S of the $ald Prairie Subdivision, consisting of approsimately 7.7 acres located at the north end of Renee Lane. Case #04-285 (JR) Jennifer Reeves, Staff Planner, presented the case and stated that the applicant's intent was to continue the growth of Edelweiss Cartens. The request was to convert the A-O Agriculture Open Tracts into R-1 Single-Family lots. The tract involves aright-of-way that has yet to be abandonded, the City of College Station was also an applicant because of the right-of--way of Renee Lane. Staff recommended approval of the zoning request • from A-O to R-1 for lots 4 and 5 as well as the right-of-way portion. Reeves stated that the subject property was annexed into the City of College Station in June 1995 and was platted in June 1973. The intent was to include lots 4 and 5 in the preliminary plat for Edelweiss Subdivision Phases 6 through 12 that will be presented to the Commission for approval in the neaz future. The land use plan shows the azea as single-family residential, the property will have access via Renee Lane, which is classified as a residential street on the thoroughfare plan. The zoning request from A-O to R-1 is in compliance with the City's comprehensive plan Staffrecommended approval of both zoning requests. Steve Arden, 311 Cecelia Loop, College Station, Texas, spoke to the Commission. Mr. Arden stated that it was unfortunate that the Commissioners were not able to see the new master plan that the project fits into, but as the project progresses it will all come together seemlessly and improve both Edelweiss Gartens and the neighborhood. Commissioner Reynolds asked if access will not ultimately be off of Renee Lane. Mr. Arden stated that Renee Lane will terminate at the zoning boundary that was indicated on the rezoning map, and there will be a cul-de-sac, and then there will be a street a couple of lots short of the end of the cul-de-sac to give more circuitous route to Mountain Breezeway. Commissioner Davis motioned for approval. Commissioner Hooton seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 6. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning by the Municipal Design Grnup fora 4.7•acre tract from A-P, Administrative-Professional • to R 4, Multi-family generally located at 1000 Spring Loop. Case #OS-i2 (TF) P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda March 3, 2005 Page 2 of 8 Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, presented the case which was a rezoning of 4.7 acres along Spring Loop presently zoned A-P. This request was for R-4 Muhi-Family. Staff • recommended approval of this request with the condition that the access easements, between the commercial and residential properties which will be reviewed at a later time, be removed at a later stage. The subject tract is undeveloped at the present time and is situated amongst a number of different types of land uses including four-plexes along Spring Loop, multi-family across the street, and various commercial and administrative professional uses along University Drive. Mr. Fletcher stated that the Comprehensive Plan in the area shows single-family high density along Spring Loop, retail regional on the interior, and residential attached on the other side of Spring Loop. Both residential areas are presently zoned R-4. The site is within one mile of the University and is in compliance with the comprehensive plan policies for its proximity to the University in serving that population. Commissioner Nichols asked for clarification regarding the access easements being exclusive to Spring Loop. Mr. Fletcher explained that the easements are presently platted and it would be cleaned up through a replat. Commissioner Nichols asked for clarification regarding staff's condition that all the access be exclusively to Spring Loop. Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group, stated that if staff were not proposing that it would be done anyway. Commissioner Davis motioned for approval. Commissioner Hooton seconded the motion, motion passed (b-0). 7. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning for the • Pebble Creek Development Company for a portion of a tract consisting of 22.692 acres and generally located at the southwest corner of Greens Prairie Road and Pebble Creek Parkway from R 4, Multi-family to R 1, Single-family Residential; from R A and R 1 to A-P, Administrative-Professional; and R-4 to C-3, Light Commercial. Case #05-16 (TIC Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner presented the case and stated that the majority of the tract was zoned R-4 and R-1. The land use plan was amended last year affecting multiple sites. Planned Development is the land use designation at this time and in the process staff's guidance for the applicant was that the district designation may be implemented through the planned developmeirt district or the more traditional zoning approach as being requested at this time. Mr. Fletcher stated that Spearman Drive was realigned from its previous alignment tieing it into Pebble Creek Parkway and it shows to tie into Greens Prairie Road in conjunction with the Fire Station median cut_ In the application, the applicant indicated this intent to establish a 45-foot buffer adjacent to the residential areas which was shown on the rezoning request. Also depicted was an established landscape reserve of 3p feet along the future Spearman Drive alignment and one possible way to implement that buffer would be to continue using a 30-foot or wider landscape reserve along those properties in Pebble Creek. Staff received a few calls regarding the request, generally of the inquiry nature but concerned about buffers and adjacencies, not necessarily the proposed uses. P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda March 3, 2005 Page 3 of 8 Commissioner Davis asked for clarification regarding the landscape reserve, whether it • would be a part of the rezoning or in the site plan as part of the platting. Mr. Fletcher stated it would be a platting issue, but because of the applicant's willingness stated in the application, that could become part of the motion to approve the rezoning if it is the will of the Commission. Jessica Jimmerson represented the applicant. Ms. Jimmerson commented that the applicant put quite a bit of thought into making the application and some of the items already mentioned by staff. Commissioner Shafer asked for clarification regarding how far out the slope extends. Ms. Jimmerson stated that in some areas it is close to the 45 feet and in other areas it extends out into what would be the AP area. Commissioner Nichols asked for clarification regarding the intent of the buffer. Ms. Jimmerson stated that was correct and more than likely that will be an area that is in addition to the buffer requirement. Davis Young, 5204 Whistley Straights, stated that quite a bit of time has been spent meeting with residenrts regarding the property and a plan has been implemented that everyone will be able to work with. Commissioner Davis asked for clarification regarding the length of the buffer. On the submission it is indicated as a 4S-foot buffer. Mr. Young stated there is a minimum requirement of 45 feet in order to prevent putting in a wall. Depending on the topography of what the line will actually be, where, at what points, if a 30-foot buffer was put in a wall could still be built in certain areas, but not on the property line. Commissioner Shafer asked for clarification from the conversations • with residents regarding whether or not the residents would want a wall built. Mr. Young stated that the residents do not watrt a wall. Commissioner Davis motioned for approval with the recommendation that a 4S-foot landscape reserve, as indicated on the submission, be part of the rezoning. Commissioner Nchols seconded motion, motion passed (6-0). 8, Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action an a PreUminary Plat that includes a replat of The Glade Section 12, consisting of 15 lots on 3.04 acres, generally located on the north side of Southwest Parkway between Glade Street and Laura Lane. Case #OS-11(JP/Jl~ Commissioners Nichols and Reynolds recused themselves from voting of this item. Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner presented the case for a preliminary plat that included a replat of The Glade, Section l2. The proposed subdivision consists of 15 single-family lots on just over 3 acres. Currently the property is zoned R-1, Single-Family Resideirtial and the preliminary plat is in preparation for asingle-family residential and field development. The plat proposes a S-foot right-of--way dedication along Southwest Parkway. On the land use plan this property is shown as single-family medium density, which allows 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre. The proposal is in complaince with the land use plan, it shows approximately 4.9 dwelling units per acre. The subdivision will access • Southwest Parkway which is a minor arterial on the thoroughfare plan and the plat is in compliance with all subdivision regulations. Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat. Ms. Prochazka stated that all staff comments have been addressed. P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda March 3, 2005 Page 4 of 8 Approximately 2S calls had been received regazding the project, about 20 calls were either in opposition or had some concern with traffic or density. The main concern • seemed to be the possibility of students living in the area or if it became student housing. Five calls were received in support of the project. Ms. Prochazka stated that several questions were received from Commissioner Davis and shared that inforamtion with the Commission. The first question related to the average lot size in the area. All of the properties that are within, or even touched by, the Z00-foot notification ring, in the area is an average .28 acres, and it is actually .28 acres of the properties that directly touch the subject property. The lot sizes proposed aze equal to or greater than those currently existing that back on to Laura Lane and are smaller than those on Glade Street. The second inquiry was regarding the past platting history on the project. The property was platted in the late 90's with the anticipation of developing as the Masonic Lodge. That development did not occur. A preliminary plat, including a replat, was proposed in eazly 2004, or late 2003, and pulled prior to the meeting due to the applicant's request, so the variances could be reviewed and met. In February 2004, the project came before the Commission in a similar configuration showing 17 lots with no variances and was denied. The reason for denial were concerns with Southwest Parkway and the alignment of the cul-de-sac to the street. Commissioner Davis also inquired about traffic impacts on Southwest Parkway. Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner, stated that the way the site was proposed North Bazdell Court will intersect Southwest Parkway at approximately 125-126 feet to the southwest of where Southwood is located. He stated that it is in compliance with the subdivision regulations. Trip generation is the assumption on how many trips a • household will make once the development is complete. It is estimated that each household will make approximately 10 trips per day, this calculates to 1 SO estimated trips. Broken down, it is estimated that there will be approximately 1 S trips during the peak hour and about 7 or 8 trips that would leave the development in the morning. The primary concern was that the vehicles that would be turning left out of the site. Mr. Fogle stated it should be a safe situation because there is a signal on Southwood. There is also a site issue due to a brick wall that is currently along the right-of--way for the majority of the frontage. When the site plan is complete, it will be required that the wall be removed where the street comes out and an additional 2S-feet on either side. Commissioner Davis inquired about the right-of--way on Southwest Parkway that is 80- feet and that the designation currently requires 90-feet. Mr. Fogle stated that the right-of- way will be extended to 90-feet, S-feet on each side. Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group, stated that there were not any drainage problems, sewer problems, or water/utility problems and what has been presented is in compliance with the ordinance. Commissioner Davis asked if Mr. Taggart could answer the question in reference to the wall, regarding not being able to see on a right turn and if the wall was currently on the property line and in the area that will be seated for the right- of-way. Mr. Taggart stated that the wall sits on the current propety line and after dedication is complete the wall will belong to the City. Commissioner Hooton asked for clarification regarding the issue of the sewer and water pipes and whether or not the area can accommodate 1S more homes. Mr. Taggart stated that he is confident that the • infrastructure will handle the additional homes. The sewer lines will be newly created and will not go back into the existing sewer lines that already exist on the common boundary with the Glade Section 11. New sewer lines will be created which run down P&Z Minutes Regutar Agenda March 3, 2405 Page 5 of 8 proposed North Bardell out to Southwest Parkway and then over to the manhole that is on Southwest Parkway. No reports have been received regarding specific utility problems. • Joy Lynn Lucas Skach, 1722 Laura Lane; Debbie Brooks, 1408 Lawyer; Claude Gibson, 1603 Laura Lane; Sharon Perry, 1712 Blade; Hugh McClendon, 1811 Southwood; Mary Ellen Bell, 1406 Lawyer; these individuals spoke in opposition to the project and stated their concerns regarding the project. The issues of opposition or concern were traffic, the type of housing, sewer, and smaller lots. Greg Bramson, 7610 River Ridge; Clay Lee, 405 Cross Street; Parvis Vessali, 100 Pershing; Linda Stribbling, 5104 St. Andrews; these individuals spoke in favor of the project. Commissioner Davis motioned that the preliminary plat be approved as presented. There was no second on the motion, motion did not pass. Commissioner Davis motioned to table the preliminary plat. Commissioner Fedora seconded the motion. Commissioner Fedora stated that the City needed to take another look at the transportation part of the project. Commissioner Davis commented that he was well aware of the traffic issues, the problem is the project that is being presented for a preliminary plaf, lots are less than the last time and the traffic generated by this in itself, while it is an issue, is the overall concern of things is not what is being addressed. The traffic in the area is what the issue is, not the incremental amount of traffic that will be added to what is already a problem. Commissioner Davis stated that a zoning request or • a platting request cannot be used, when all aspects of the proposal have been met by the applicant, zoning cannot be tied with what may be built there, the Commission can only address the use. Commissioner Hooton asked if the request met all the requirements, can it be denied. Roxanne Nemcik, Assistant City Attorney, stated that if the plat meets all minimum requirements, it is a minesterial function and it should therefore be approved by the Commission. She stated, however, that if the Commission had questions concerning any aspect of the plat, the matter can be tabled in order to get a response from staff. Generally, the answer is that if it meets minimun requiements the Commission is required to approve it. However, depending on the issue the Commission has, there may be a basis for going back and looking at the plat again and having questions answered by staff. Commissioner Davis asked about time if the motion was tabled. Ms. Nemcik stated that on a plat, from the date of its application, if the Commission does not approve it within 30 days from the date a completed application is filed and accepted by the City, then the plat is automatically approved as a matter of law, if it is not defied. Ms. Prochazka made a comment that the 30 days will be up within the next week and a half or so. Commissioner Shafer stated that as a Commission, Commissioners are responsible for looking at how things are happening in College Station overall and to look at the community as it is growing as a whole. Commissioner Shafer stated that the traffic issue is something that cannot be fixed with this Commission, and that it will be a good thing for the neighborhood and community. Commissioner Hooton stated that she agreed with Commissioner Shafer, although empathetic for the concerns of traffic and concerns about the housing becoming rental property, at some point they have to believe what the • developers are stating. Commissioner Hooton stated that the project looked like a nice project and if the City utlities are a problem then that problem needs to be addressed with the City. P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda March 3, 2005 Page 6 of 8 Commissioners voted on the motion of tabling the project. Commissioner Davis • voted to table the project, Commissioners Hooton and Fedora and Chariman Skater opposed this miotion, motion did not pass. Commissioner Hooton motioned to approve the preliminary plat. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion, motion passed (40). 9. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for Bald Prairie Lots 6, 7 ~$ 8 and a Fiaal Plat for Edelweiss Gartens Ph. 6 consisting of 581ots on 15.7 acres generally located at Victoria Avenue and Night Rain Drive. Case #04191(AG) Alan Gibbs, Senior Assistant City Engineer, presented the final plat and replat of Edelweiss Gartens, Phase 6. The replat was for a portion of the acreage currerrtly replated as Bald Prairie lots 6, 7, and 8. The project consists of 58 lots on approximately 15.7 acres. The replat is a revision of a plat that was approved in September 2004. The revision is primarily the addition of a reserve tract. The developer's intent is to include the reserve tract into a future phase of development. The proposal does not change the number of lots; it reduces the lot depths of Fames Court. Previously the lots were extended deeper and Fames Court was shifted slightly. Mr. Gibbs stated that the plat and replat is in compliance with the comprehensive and the land use plan shown as single- family residential. The thoroughfare plan shows Mountain Breezeway, as a minor collector. He stated that parkland has been dedicated by the replat adjacent to Latina Court. Staff recommended approval of the plat. • Commissioner Nichols asked if the remainder of Renee Lane would be abandoned when the next plat is submitted. Mr. Gibbs stated that the developer submitted an application that is in process to abandon a portion of Renee Lane and to incorporate it. Commissioner Nichols asked if Mountain Breezeway will stay or if it will be changed to Eagle Drive. Mr. Fogle stated that there was a change with a plat that will carry through the development as Eagle Avenue. Commissioner Fedora asked who is extending Victoria to Lot 14. Mr. Gibbs stated that he is unfamiliar with the discussions, but believes that Stylecraft is building that portion. Steve Arden stated that Stylecraft awns the adjacent land and within the next several months that piece would be constructed. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the replat. Commissioner Hooton seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items ~ A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific tactual information or the recitation of entsting policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. No items discussed. • P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda March 3, 2005 Page 7 of 8 I1. Adjourn. • Commissioner Davis motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Fedora seconded motion, motion passed (6-0). Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services • • P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda March 3, 2005 Page 8 of 8 Regular Agenda Item 3 Absence Requests Scott Shafer -- March 17, 200, Meeting John Nichols ~-March 17, 2005, Meeting .. .. Page .1; Lisa Lindgren -,Fwd. Re:. DRB on 3/11/05. • From: To: Mandi Alford Scott Shafer Date: 2/28/200510:23;Z6 AM Subject: Fwci: Re: DRB on 3111/05 Scott his email is alank(~cox-intemet.com I have forwarded your absence request for P8Z to Lisa. Thanks Mandl Alford Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services City of College Station www.csbc.gov maffordt~csbc.gov "Life is a book and you are its author. You determine its plot and pace and you -only you - tum the Pa9~•" - Beth Mende Conny »> "Scott Shafer'" <ssl~afgr(~ag.tamu.edu> 2/28/200510:17:56 AM »> Mandl - I will be out of town March 11th and will need to get someone to chair that meeting. Please consider this my request for an excused absence. Do you have Alan King's email? If so please send it to me and • i'If check with him about being chair. 1 will also be out of town Thursday March 17th and would Nke to submit this note as a request for absence notification to the PB~Z for that meeting the 17th. I have talked to Ben White about stepping in as chair. He has indicated that he will do so. Please take care of this absence n3quest or pass it along to the appropraite person as needed. Thanks in advance for your help on this... Scott Shafer »> "Mandi Alford" <~I~ cstx.aov> 02/28/2005 9:41:41 AM »> C3ood Morning Scottlt!! You had asked me to let you know if we will be having a DRB meeting on 3111105 and it cooks like we will. You had said something about needing to get a Chairman for that meeting. Have a great day. Mandi Alford Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services City of College Station wywv.c~bc.oov gaa~fp~,x.aov • "Life is a book and you are its author. You determine its plot and Lisa Lind ren Request for Pardon March 17 2005 .:....:.:: _.. ..: . ...:::::: ..:::::::.. : ,.. _.. Page 1 • • From: "John Nichols" <jpn(~ag.tamu.edu> To: <Llindgren~csbc.gov> Dats: 3/12/2005 4:55:52 PM Subject: Request for Pardon -March 17, 2005 Dear Lisa, Please submit this as my request for pardon for the PB~Z meeting next Thursday evening, March 17, 2005. I will be traveling out of State on business. 1 would appreciate the Commissioners approving this request for pardon for missing the regular meeting. Thank you for your consideration. John John P. Nichols Professor and interim Head Department of Agricultural Economics Director, Center for Consumer and Food Marketing Issues Institute of Food Science & Engineering Texas A6M University College Station TX 77843-2124 Phone: 978-845-8491 (faculty office) Phone: 979-845-2116 (Department Office) Fax: 979-862-3019 E-mail: jpnr~tamu.edu Website: http://agecon.tamu.edu CC: "Scott Shafer" <SShafer(~ag.tamu.edu> • Regular Agenda Item 5 Rezoning Case #04-28 (JP) • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner Date: March 11, 2005 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning for Callaway Subdivision Phase II, consisting of 14 acres, located on the east side of Marion Pugh Drive approximately 500' south of the intersection of George Bush Drive, including a portion of the Luther Street Right-of-Way, from C-1 General Commercial to R-6 High Density Multi-Family. Applicant: Rabon Metcalf Engineering, agent for Callaway Development Corporation, and the City of College Station, owner of the Luther Street Right-of- Way. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. Item Summary: The applicant requests this rezoning in order to develop the property as amulti-family housing complex. The property to the west, across Marion Pugh Drive, is zoned R-6 and is developed as apartments. The property to the south, across the Luther right-of- • way, is zoned R-4 and M-1 and is not developed. The property to the east, across the railroad right-of-way and Wellborn Road, is zoned R-1 and A-P and developed as single-family homes and offices. The northern property is developed as a parking lot for the Callaway House Dormitory and is zoned C-1. The rezoning of the Luther Street Right-of-Way is not an approval of the right-of- way abandonment. The right-of-way will be submitted to the City Council for consideration through an abandonment ordinance. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates this property as Residential Attached, therefore the rezoning request is in compliance with the Land Use Plan. The location of the rezoning request is also supported by the City's development policies which attempt to locate multi-family in close proximity to Texas A&M University. Marion Pugh Drive is designated as a major collector on the Thoroughfare Plan, Wellborn Road is designated as a major arterial, and Luther is a residential street in this area. Item Background: The property was annexed in to the City and zoned Industrial in 1958. When the zoning was changed to M-2, the district also included C-1 uses. In 1984 an amendment was made to the Zoning Ordinance that prohibited • C-1 uses in M-2 zones, however, this particular property was specifically exempted from the exclusion of C-1 uses in an M-2 zone, and allowed the General Commercial uses. With the adoption of the Unified Development • Ordinance, City Staff worked with the property owners by giving them the choice of retaining the M-2 classification without the commercial uses or being rezoned to C-1 to include the commercial uses. The property is zoned C-1. Luther Street was closed in this area in the 1990s. Information on Multi-family Housing in College Station: The Comprehensive Plan proposes 1,043 acres of Residential Attached in specific locations. There are currently 1,357 acres zoned multi-family, R-4 or R-6. 950 total acres developed as multi-family 841 acres developed as apartments & condominiums and 109 acres developed as group housing (off campus dorms) 203 acres zoned multi-family, but undeveloped. However, these are not necessarily in areas where we desire multi-family growth. Approximately 204 acres zoned multi-family, but developed as other uses. Approximately 26 acres (in various locations) currently zoned for multi- . family, but undeveloped, within one mile of Texas A&M University campus. Current occupancy rates for multi-family units: 86% B/CS area 87% College Station Current occupancy rates for all rental units: 85% B/CS 86% College Station Texas rental vacancy rates in 2003 (Census Bureau) were 14.1%. A certain level of vacancy is generally needed for ease of movement, housing choice, and affordability. Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission's options are: 1. Recommend approval; 2. Recommend denial; . 3. Table indefinitely; or, 4. Defer action to a specified date. • INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water Service: Service can be taken from the 18" main along Marin Pugh. Sewer Service: Service can be taken from the main along the railroad ROW. Streets/Access: The property fronts on and has access to Marion Pugh. Any access to this property must meet the Driveway Ordinance. Drainage: A Development Permit is required for development of the site. It appears the site drains to the southeast, along the railroad ROW. Flood Plain: The subject tract is not located within the 100-year flood plain. Oversize request: None. Impact Fees: None. NOTIFICATION: • Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 3-2-05 and 3-31-05 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 3-17-05 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 4-14-05 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners within 200': 22 Response Received: As ~ of the date of this staff report, I have not received any phone calls on this case. • • Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial 3. Application & Staff Memo 4. Infrastructure and Facilities 5. Letter from neighboring property owner • • /Iii _ ~,, ~~ CFO BFPl o cF9 ti` ~ersnu o~ ~oz ~ L S5 v ~ ~ °~ °z h 0 1 V O ~ (~ D ~ .~0 m m~ ~ ~ D -Zj fA C p ~ -, '" z m ~ z m z Cm~ <Dm ~~N <~ NR,X mO y^p D r r~ -C ~ C7 D r O ~` C ~ N ~ m ^^ a lJ ~ r ~ ~ ~ I c ~ ~ ~, o ~ ~ ,,. ~~`~ 0 ~ , ~` p~ a w y _~ a q aq C 91 \ yy b~ Z o q '' a ~~ O ,ONp~""ed ` ' ~~^a a`ti$''Oj ~q~ oe ~ ` e ~"q` t ~:, q MpU 'til e~~ ~~, ~ q'$ 'pll3,a~j _ ~,~ U ~ ` ~o ^' r _ N A ti a s v ~ ~ ~ s p Z ©~, c`„'~ my ~ ~ ~ .y Ca °` ~~' m a ,. 9 ° ,. ~ ci A ~ a ,Fp ~ b ~-. y 1 ~ `- I ~ ti v cd qC ~ c.. ~20~ 'n/ a ~ CP a ,. r, r r ~ ~ a „~, `~.' ga"09 d' v~ ~' CPU q n r U= ~ ' r l 9 ti N ~ a ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ Dz= ~~~ v a, o ~ Y' O' ~ N W b C"~ S ~ ~"" ~ ~ ~ ~ wa q N tr ~, a N m $ °~ a ~ 'vim v ^' w d _ o° ~ q9~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ ti ti _~ w ~ a +A/~ a ~, ~~ ~ ~ b "'9 ~ w U m /Z~ rya L. ~b Cn a ~_O wry ~ C(~ ~ ~ „p ~, ~ Z ~ o '4 ^' u ~`~a nod' o. _. ~ -~ m a.,, ` J `\~ ~ ~'Q. `°~ ~' o ~°+ ~ ash ~m `,v qqp q ~, q c^ a P ~~,~ ,. y0~lf ' ~ yy q b` ,. ~.. ~ r ~ ~ \ .(-,o ~'J ~ a~~ ~ " \\a c,,, ; cp~~ 'r191, ~ ~" 4 do ~ m \ a ~,. ,~(!. . ( 1 O ~~ m q FOE USE ONLY CASE NO. DATE SUBMITTED - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT REZONING APPLICATION t ) 8- is ~, MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning 8 Zoning Commission or City ouncil. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: Application completed in full. $500.00 application fee ', Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24"x36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and . ` e. All public and private rights-of-way and easemerrts bounding and intersecting subject land. V Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot 8 block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). ,~ The Rezoning Supporting Infom-ation sheet completed in full. Datie of Required Pr+®application Conference:Aari130.2003 APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: Name Rabon Metcalf Enaineerins~ Street Address P.O. Box 9253 • City Colles~e Station State TX Zip Code 77842 E-Mail Address rmens~inesr+~3uno.com Phone Number f979) 219-4174 Fax Number (979) 690-0,~29 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name Callaway Development Coroaoration Street Address 1250 NE Looo 410. Suite 800 City San Antonio State TX Zip Code 78209 E-Mail Address acallawav~callawavdevelooment.com Phone Number (210) 822-0Z00 Fax Number L2'10) 822-3361 This property was corneyed to owner by deed dated 3/7/00. 11/21/U0. 11/21100. 1/23101 and recorded in Volume 3750.3987.3987.4036, Page 327.36.64, 5~ of the Brazos County Deed Records. General Location of Property: Qne block South of the intersection of Georoe Bush Dr b Marion Puah Dr and on the East side of Marion Puah Dr. Address of Property: Legal Description:13.768 acres out of the J.E. Scot Survey A-50. Brazos County. TX Acreage -Total Property: 13.768 sting Zoning: C-1 Proposed Zoning: R-6 resent Use of Property: Maiorlty its vacant with tha exceatlon of one :mail commercial business Proposed Use of Property;His~h densitrtr residential student housins~ REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. • The owner of the pn~perty d~ir+es to chans~e the zoninsi of this property from General Commerical tC- 11 to Hkth Density Residential tR-61 for the development of a student housing complex. 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. This zone chans~e is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and other adiacent developments 3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change. • The applicant has prepared this applicatron and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION /S FILED BY ANYON~~ER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOM AN D BYA POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. (or agent) or ap icarrt Date • • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MEMORANDUM March 7, 2005 TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Joey Dunn, Director of Planning & Development Services SUBJECT: Callaway Phase II Rezoning • As the Zoning Administrator for the City of College. Station, I am initiating a rezoning request for a portion of Luther Street Right-of--Way from C-1 General Commercial to R-6 High Density Multi-Family. This request is in conjunction with the rezoning request for the Callaway property located on the east side of Marion Pugh Drive. This area is planned for the development of an apartment project. This portion of the Luther Street Right-of-Way is required to be abandoned prior to moving forward with the platting and site planning of this property. The rezoning of the Luther Street Right-of-Way is not an approval of the Right-of- Way abandonment. • Home of Texas A&M University • INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water Service: Service can be taken from the 18" main along Marin Pugh. Sewer Service: Service can be taken from the main along the railroad ROW. Streets/Access: The property fronts on and has access to Marion Pugh. Any access to this property must meet the Driveway Ordinance. Drainage: A Development Permit is required for development of the site. It appears the site drains to the southeast, along the railroad ROW. Flood Plain: The subject tract is not located within the 100-year flood plain. Oversize request: None. Impact Fees: None. NOTIFICATION: • Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 3-2-05 and 3-31-05 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 3-17-05 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 4-14-05 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners within 200': 22 Response Received: As of the date of this staff report, I have not received any phone calls on this case. • AIMCO • • • Apartment Investment and Management Company City of College Station Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue South PO Box 9960 College Station, TX77842 June 21, 2004 To Whom It May Concern: Re: Consideration of an ordinance Rezoning 13.768 Acres located on the East side of Marion Pugh Drive approximately 500' south of the intersection of George Bush Drive from C-1 General Commercial to R-6 High Density Multi-Family. This is formal notification by the owners of Treehouse II Apartments to the City of College Station that the rezoning ordinance referenced above is at this time opposed by us. We would seek (1) formal review of the traffic impact plan and (2) formal review of the drainage plan prior to approval of this project. racey Logan Director of University Communities ~ ~ 04 ai 4SS2 SOUTH ULSTER STREET PARKWAY • SUITE 1100 • DENVER, COLORADO 80237 • TELEPHONE (3O3) 757-8 Regular Agenda Item 6 Conditional Use Permit Case #04-188 (JR) • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves Date: 03-02-05 Email: jreeves@cstx.gov Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit -Use & Site for a StealthTelecommunications Tower consisting of approximatly 3.175 acres at 903 Krenek Tap, generally located on the north side of Krenek Tap Road just east of Dartmouth Drive. Applicant: Mike Crain, (Market Director) Fossil Creek Land Company Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit as submitted. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a stealth telecommunications tower designed as an (80) eighty-foot flag pole approximately 150- feetfrom the front property line. As you may be aware this item unanimously was denied by the Commission and the City Council April of last year. At the time there were concerns about the proximity to Krenek Tap Road. There were also concerns with the property in its current context with the existing single family home, and the majority of the surrounding property being undeveloped. Additionally there were concerns that the applicant had not exhausted alternatives in the search ring that was presented with the application. • Since that time the applicant has been in contact with eleven other potential sites that are located within the search ring. The applicant has provided certified letters that were to the property owners, none have expressed interest in the cell tower proposal Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The subject property and properties to the west are shown on the Land Use Plan as Single Family Medium Density. The property to the east is shown as Residential Attached. The property to the south, across Krenek Tap Road, is shown as Civic Center Property (City Center). The subject property is currently zoned R-4 Multi-Family and developed as a single family residence. The property to the west is zoned R-4 Multi-Family and is undeveloped; however, the next property over is currently under construction as a retirement project. To the south across Krenek Tap Road is undeveloped Single Family, to the north is R-3 Townhouse developed as townhouse and duplex, and to the east is R-4 Multi-Family developed as Condominiums. Again, with the additional information the applicant has provided to staff, because sitel, the stealth tower has been relocated approximately 95-feet from its original location, and with the large retirement development under construction, staff feels that the applicant has exhausted all other alternatives and is recommending approval for this request. Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the City of College Station city limits in 1971 and platted March 2005. • Created on 3/1/2005 10:50 AM ~ P:1 GROUPI HTLTRI PZLTRI PRODI PZ20041 P0010803. DOC • Telecommunications Act The Telecommunications Act of 1996 established guidance for local municipalities to regulate telecommunications facilities. While the industry sought to exempt themselves from local regulation, the Act affirms the authority of local municipalities to regulate. There are basically five conditions set forth in the act that affect local zoning authority: 1. "Local zoning requirements may not unreasonably discriminate among wireless telecommunications providers that compete against one another." 2. "Local zoning requirements may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless telecommunications service." 3. "A local government must act within a reasonable period of time on requests for permission to place or construct wireless telecommunications facilities." 4. "Any city or county council or zoning board decision denying a request for permission to install or construct wireless telecommunications facilities must be in writing and must be based on evidence in a written record before the council or board." 5. "If a wireless telecommunications facility meets technical emissions standards set by the FCC, it is presumed safe. A local government may not deny a request to construct a facility on grounds that its radiofrequency emissions would be harmful to the environment or the health of residents if those emissions meet FCC standards." • Current Ordinance The City's current ordinance was adopted in December 1997 and amended in September 2004. The Ordinance is designed to comply with the Telecommunications Act and address concerns over the construction of new transmission towers. The approach of this ordinance is to require separation between towers and encouraging co- loration and alternative designs. The stealth design element is a key component of the ordinance that was designed to provide a creative alternative. The stealth design provisions allow companies a way to provide service in a low impact form where typical transmission towers would not be permitted. WTF Considerations: In addition to the standard CUP guidelines (described below), the Commission shall consider the following additional factors when determining whether to recommend a CUP for a telecommunication facility: • Height of the proposed tower, surrounding topography and tree coverage and foliage as they relate to: a. Skyline impact, examining whether the proportions of the structure appears to dominate or blend in with the surrounding environment and b. Shadow impact, whether or not the proposed tower will cast shadows that would prevent the reasonable use of enjoyment or surrounding properties. • Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness. • Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries. • Economic impact on adjacent and nearby properties. • Proposed ingress and egress. • Availability of suitable alternatives and/or existing support structures. Created on 3/1/200510:50 AM 2 P: I GROUPWTLTRI PZLTRI PRODI PZ20041 P0010803. DOC • Commission Action Options: The Commission is a recommending body to the City Council, which has final authority over the Conditional Use Permit and associated site plan. The options regarding the use permit are: 1. Approval as submitted; 2. Approval with conditions relating to specific site characteristics or with time limitations; 3. Denial with specified reasons for denial; 4. Table; or, 5. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial 3. Application 4. Application Requirements for a Major WTF (information available upon request) 5. Search Ring 6. Letter from Bracewell & Patterson L.L.P. Attorneys At Law 7. Copy of Site, Landscape ~ Elevation Plan NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 03-01-05 and 04-01-05 • Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 03-17-05 Advertised Hearing Dates: 03-17-05 and 04-14-05 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 31 Response Received: None as of date of staff report C, Created on 3/1/2005 10:50 AM 3 P:1 GROUPI HTLTRI PZLTRI PRODI PZ20041 P0010803. DOC ~~ ~~ ~~ m~ ~~ N ~_ 7`J O _~ O z TV N ~ .. W ° , ~ In " c"q~'2` ~C~ J ~ ~ x "11 Cr ~~ ~ a„ 1 t u' zJ/7 jJ N ~ " ~ ~ N '~ ~ ~' o ' c i. K ~ - t ,at iy~~o~ n!~ r7n 1 co',q, b b t J•7 , ~=;,a 2 a .~~y ~ m - ` 4 J 977 ~~j7 ~t tq~' ~ '~ o~ r$C9 ~ A '~ Su:l ~ F `~. sr ~„ v ~ A y 1 0~ a ~.. `a C` ~ fa ON P ~ ti fit" ;.1 ti ~ or ` w ~i u ~ '~ o~, ~ _ Z w ~ """-'i C~ ~ _ ' ty ~ q q M ~ L ~, ~ _ ~a ~' ` ~ ~ ~ 30 ~ , i~, H 7 ~ • ~0. ~ i„~ ~ 79 u r na b p ~. 'Ti b i.. p ffi 5 ' ~ ~ . 4 ~\y ~ '~ H ~ ~ ~ H ~ wi~`O~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' N ~ ~ . ~NO\yv ~ w _ a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~, ' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ti No\1dN~ ~ $m _~..~ 5a I...:.1 ~ ~ $ a rt. N- 17 b - r ~ p : : : :~:~ : : \') Cam. f.:: ~~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ a ~ V ~ tn V M - C sO~r ~r x ~ ~ ~' ~' +w y ~ 9 ; ; : : ::;:;:;: ; c:f Q~s, 1 ! !~ y~ g ~ N C~ ti.. u a c ~) - - ti ~ 1 5 ' a ~ ~° ~ _' a ~ ~, ~ ., ~ ti,°^a~ ~ a ~~- ~ ao ,~ ~ w :, ra ~ ~ . ~l~~ r +. ~ ~r ~ '~ $~ ' ~.t.. a., ~, i ,y • a, .. ~ .~~ 971 ~~ I ~ ,~ r V ~ rN I S ~^ q ' '~ `' .~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tx 1 _ ~' '1i q , ~ v ~ ti ,~, ~= aF ~o ' W ' ..c~~ ~ , w. *~ . iy~' v\'\,~5'y8 ~ a ~"'Q S •! ~~ I'. ; ~S "'~ 'e 9' ° = is ~ ~ ' '' ~ ~ . ; :~* . •i I t 4Q. - - ~ Ef1' ::: : ~<. - 3~~'i ~~ ~- rrl~ ~ /) ~~~1 d ~' . ' ' ' ~ ' 1 ~ • ` ' ~ ~ .7 al'` '~' . ; . ' ' ~, ~s ~~~ ~ :~ z: ~_..~ a rLl Si,:~ !._' n S~ ~~~ TC f:~1 L•~ V I•"~ FOR O,F/FICEi USE ONLY ~"~~ O CASE NO. O~1-~g$ b .~ \~ DATE SUBMITTED - - Major Wireless Telecommunications Facilities CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION Minimum Requirements ~ $300.00 application, processing, and notification fee ~~ $200.00 Site Plan Review Fee (includes 3 staff reviews). $200.00 Development Permit Application Fee if applicable. $600.00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable. (This fee is payable if construction of a '~ /public waterline, sewerline, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved.) / Eleven (11) copies of site plan that meet requirements for WTF's as described in Section 6.3.Q of the Unified Development Ordinance and includes requirements for site plan proposals as listed on the attached sheet. This site plan will go to City Staff for review, after which Eleven (11) copies of the revised site plan will be required. ~ Detailed explanation of proposed use including the location, type, and height of the proposed facility, anticipated traffic, number of employees, etc. Additional requirements listed on following page. Date of Required Preapplication Conference: ~ight of Transmission Tower: 80' NAME OF PROJECT H059XC439A (Wright -College Station) ADDRESS 903 Krenek Tap Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3.175 acres in the Morgan Rector Survey, abstract 46 APPLICANT (Primary Contact for the Project): Name Mike Crain Street Address 7703 Painton Lane City Spring State TX Zip Code 77389 E-Mail Address mcraint'c~fossilcreek.com Phone Number 832-928-0100 Fax Number 281-516-2158 PROi~ERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name Arthur and Nancy Wright Family Limited Partnershi Street Address 1008 Holt Street City College Station State TX Zip Code 77840 E-Mail Address • Phone Number 979-693-1448 or 979-2555220 Fax Number 979-693-1448 6/13/03 1 of 6 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name Kellv Moran (WT Communication Design Group) • Street Address 3001 LBJ Freewav. Suite 129 City Dallas State TX Zip Code 75234 E-Mail Address kellv.morantcru~wtcdq.com Phone Number 972-739-0761 Fax Number 972-739-0762 OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.) Name Patricia Towerv (Sprint PCS) Street Address 15413 Vantage Parkway West City Houston State TX Zip Code 77032 E-Mail Address Pat.A.TowervCcamail.sprint.com Phone Number 936-443-4855 Fax Number 281-618-8486 PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Single Family Acreage (Investment Property) CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY R4 - Mutti family residential I verify that all of the information contained in this application is true and correct. IF APPLICATION 1S FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. Signa re of Owner, Agent pplicant S~/~ //I v • 6113/03 2 of 6 Rpplications for MAJOR WTFs must include: Y An inventory of the applicant's existing and future towers that area either within the City, the City's ETJ, or within at least 1 mile of the City's boundary where the ETJ does not extend that far, as outlined in Unified Development Ordinance in Section 6.3.Q.8.b Application Procedures. The owner must have on file with the City a master list of all existing tower structures owned or controlled by the owner. The existing towers must be overlaid and shown on the City of College Stations Geographical Information System. The linear separation distance from other transmission towers within aone-mile radius of the proposed tower site. The linear separation distance from all residentially-zoned properties, residential structures and applicable thoroughfares as outlined in Section 6.3.Q.4.b, Proximity to Major Thoroughfares, within 500 feet of the proposed tower. A visual impact analysis, presented as color photo simulations, showing the proposed site of the WTF, as outlined in Unified Development Ordinance in Section 6.3.Q.8.e Application Procedures. Plans for the antenna and the antenna tower shall be prepared and signed by a licensed professional engineer and designed to withstand sustained winds of at least 80 miles per hour. Affidavit confirming compliance with FAA regulations, FCC regulations and regulations of any other agency of the Federal Government with the authority to regulate telecommunication facilities. Grid Plan (propagation map) of the service area for existing and future structures for a period of not less than 5 years. The submission should include the "search ring" overlaid onto the City of College Station Geographic Information Systems showing aerial photograph, parcel lines, and streets. The "search ring" must be the area required for siting the proposed facility. A letter addressed to the City declaring an intent and willingness to construct a proposed tower that would allow additional service providers to locate on the tower. Documentation of need and alternatives according to Section 6.3.Q.10 of the Unified Development Ordinance Documentation. • 6/13!03 3 of 6 .~' ,. +~ ~ ,r: ~R d .er ~i ~. F. ,~,~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~. » y ^' / b . :, ~, ,~ . ~~ Y .~~• P i r ;~~ ~~ ., -:~~;• y ,~^ ~ i '~ RACEWELL • ATTE RSONL.LP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 500 N. Akard Street, Sulte 4000 Dallas, Texas 75201-3387 Phone: 214.758.1000 Fax: 214.758.1010 January 31, 2005 Via Email DATA FURNISHED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISPLAYED IN WHOLE OR IN PART FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN TO EVALUATE THE DOCUMENT Ms. Jennifer Reeves City of College Station City of College Station Legal Dept. P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 7784 Re: SprintCom, Inc: ("Sprint") Wright Cell Tower, 903 ICrenek Tap Road, College Station, Texas; Zoning application (the "Application") C7 Deaz Jennifer: Enclosed please find the Affidavit of Patricia Towery, Senior Properly Specialist for Sprint, regarding the above-referenced Application. Attached to the Affidavit is a propagation map reflecting radio frequency coverage in the City of College Station, Texas (the "City") in Sprint's licensed bandwidth. Also attached thereto is a map reflecting the site number, site name, site address and coordinates, and structure type and height for all of Sprint's sites currently operated within the City and its ETJ. Finally, Ms. Towery affirms that, currently, the proposed site is the only new coverage or capacity PCS site proposed by Sprint through the end of 2006 within the city limits or ETJ of the City. All of the attached documentation and information is confidential and proprietary to Sprint and is being delivered to you in satisfaction of your Ordinance. In this connection, you are hereby instructed that the attached aze not to be made a part of the public record and shall be held as confidential by the City. Sprint requests that it be given sufficiently prompt notice of any public information request regarding the attached information to enable it to seek injunctive relief against disclosure. Sprint is unable to project its radio frequency coverage or capacity and new PCS site needs beyond 2006. Sprint objects to the City's Ordinance requirement that it provide a "grid plan (propagation map) of the service area for existing and future structures for a period of not less • DALLAS1238213.1 Houston Austin Corpus Christi Dallas Fort Wotth San Antonio Washington, D.C. Northern Virginia London Almaty 1-31-05 04- ~~8 RACEWELL • ATTE RSON L1P. ATTORN lY! AT LAW Ms. Jennifer Reeves City of College Station January 31, 2005 Page 2 than five veara". Such grid plan does not exist beyond 2006. Nevertheless, the attached information and documentation are being delivered, without waiving Sprint's objections, in an effort to satisfy the Ordinance. Your acceptance of this correspondence and attached information and documentation on behalf of the City shall constitute its consent to the above-referenced conditions. Please contact me with any questions or comments. Very truly yours, Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P. • KBB/jmh Enclosure cc: Harvey Cargill, Esq. City of College Station (via email) Pat Tower SprintCom, Inc. (via email) • • i• pt 5 ~qq 21 l Q d 6• ~z ~~ ~~ _ _ P~ e I a ~ I '~ I I I ~ i ~ ~$ ~ 1 ~id ~ I \~ i I -- a~~ a <>ia A€~ Bp y p 3~ a~~~ $ ~~ j'" ~ .A 8 ~~~ ~~ o ~~ r ' ~ i ~ ~R ~ ~3I ~4 a _ __ 6 ° ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ 11 i ~ 4~ I ' ~~ qa 1 _ ~ °~ ~~' ~~ 0 Q~` ~~ ~o ^~ ~ + - ~ ~ RAC Y b ? 'd c u ~ v 9 I ~~ j J ~ I' 2 ~ i~J) B A~,JJ ~ 3 .i ~ Fs~ 1 i I~ ~ °~o p' %' . . C~ I 1 1 Q~ ?, ~J N ~ I~ ~ + J ~ .r ~ J ~2~,, jw` 1 I '2 O ~ _ ~ ~~O it i i~ > > ~~~ f ~> .6. .S I I I Z A QC5 / ¢~~ ~ I I ~ "~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1- r~ ~ i A~ p 1 I ~_ 1 ~ ~ e ~ go ~ ~~ i ~ M I ~ o 1 ~ T ~`?~J pp 'n2j I ~~ ~ I a ~ A ?9 `'~'. . . 1 ~ ~ n n D m~$ ~ Cyf g = nnn Ao D ~ A P ~ N ~ ~ ~~~ m~ m m i - • ~ ~ c~"~ -i~ p s !$ < o~ ~, x ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 8 _ µ ~\ ~$ I ..~~.:`4- o I T~j~ A' I S ~m ~' ~~u m ~3~p ~'o ~yk~ ~> 7 n0 z '`~? E) e J `~6 66 -~ Sprint. 5030 RIVERSIDE DRNE suITE 301 IRVINE, TEXAS 75039 • • • F 1/ j _ ~ C V'. 8 ~' a n/ t / b » ~ ~ _ D ~ ~ / ~ / ~ d ~ ~ b l l/ ri~ b y b / / y a # ~ ~ > # x Y ~ ~ # b i~ ~I. :~ =- ~ , , ~~ ~ ~ I a I ~ ,~ I sxa ~~<J~s aza i IY F F~yy~~~ sa i I Ih ~~^ ~~y~ ~~ I ~qq nC ~ ~~. I I AZ c z o U[ ~~>J x 3~ `~ 6i ~---------- I -a ~~ ~ >b z 4 s ~~ ig ~~ ~;. NB4 R# ;e ale ~ ~ € fil; k$ d 55 !E~ e~ I I I p ~11 si L ~~ 0 w J ' r ~J .. ._. _` ~ _ OJ ~I 2 fI +I ~ - I ~iA N ° > > !S ~ o ~~ 9 ~ + ~`'J~2 J9 I~ dJ l~i,n~J 9J }-.J T V~ ~ ~2J • _.I % "~i IIC ~-J ~P~ 2J QJ bb I .n2J ~ I ~-.. ~. I y ? ~~JJ JJ 11 ! S~ A I l~ _ : v `~ Fps ~ I ~- ~ ; O A'~J (.'..... .._.__ I J2. ~ nrp 0 N Z p~ ~ ~ ~ S~i> ~ M -c ~~°w f A n ` ~ ~ES°~g~~ ~~ N ~ ~ 3 i ~ Vn~~ N ~ = 4~~ ~ i 1 ~~a,:~u9 ??FE zo N ~ ~~~ ~>~ fmA= C ~ .. ~~mx~y~~~~ YYZ£o= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SOJO RIVERSIDE DRIVE ~ gay ~ x ~ x " ;g~' y 33k~ `vim sulTEaoi ~2> D ~ 3 "p'$~ym~L~ ~ 5 ~~ IRVINGi, TEXA875038 ~ O~,>, ~ ~ ~ n4~4Ao ~z ~• Z ~~_; ~mNo D • r~ • F i ~ I ~~, `~; ~% ~`. ~~ FF ~~~~ f~~9 FS€ A€~ 4~ I I .\' ~ ~ i ~A. Ss~~~ ~ f~~~~ ~a a~ I ~ ~~ i y ,{ ii I SS ~~iJ AVy ~~~6T~~ ~~ ~ I I I,r R g F ~ I ' q~ p} { .pi AB~i yd~ I I 6+ ee ~ ~e~¢ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~a ~ ~ .~. ~A z a; & ~ ~ x~ ~~~~~ x$gA~ qg~ a I j ~ 9 ~ ~ 3~~~~~ ~g { i I ~' _~ `" ~~~ ' ~i ~~~~ k_~t is ~A I 1 F 'i~ w~ ~ ~ ~ ~t 9 p~.. ~ I ~5~,'4Y~ Few I I 4 ~-_~ j ~ ~` ~ I IT E:.~L~ i j f¢¢j~~ ~+ I I Fs R.t~i ~- 's L ~- I I ! T~ ~ b i I (•S ~ Ems.. 4 ii~ ~ i ~+i f~ f z ~ I i S 1;s:1 I I I ~ ltye ili , F N 0 ~ I 1 ~S A n d~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ I~ ~~; ~~~ i ~ ~ V a i 1~ G ~a ~P ~ :t >~p00 9fFj ;~~ _ ~ R I I ~ ~i°C ~ ~~ ~~ O Q~ ;ij I+# L ~~ ~, ,i I I t h 9 ~ a s ------ a = _ .. a ~~ ~_._ _ ~ g: I ¢ ~, o L. •. ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~. ~ 8 ; ~-~-~ ~5~ - --- \ ~i \ S TT A N I . ~ ~ ~1~ ~'+A h . ~. ~,~ ~ ~. i I ® I ! ~ fi ® ^,, ~ "~. f ~- I I .a .o-.w~ I- ` ¢ I] \ .''. aaec raw aonn 11 tw w.w~ ~ ~~ ~ a~ ~ €M ~N ~~~ ~V ~ ~~~ €g;~ ~ ~ ~~ CENTRA PARK ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ asp €gq~ , ~ d ~ L f~ '+ - A ~ g T ~N ill 7 g® ^A ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 T IV ~G ~+ ~~ ~i ~ R e ~~€! I 1 O A ~ Y S O A ~ m e FA I .. .. ., (~ C i : ~ ~ N~ ifi 01 .. ~ 7v~~Rp7e.'~q ~ cad q s; ~ 9'S ~ 9 N N ~ i < ~ ~V~~z~~u9 _ R ~ O'9 D+ ?C ` ~M~R;`o$r :~Y~ ~; ~ SO~ORSUITEJOtDRNE ~_~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~:~~. .• y ~y ~RHIND, TEXA375039 ~. .wi ~4~~1i1i ni Z D ~ m ~ 'n - Regular Agenda Item 7 Variance Case #05-21 (Jricc) • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner Date: March 11, 2005 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Item: Public hearing, presentation, consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Variance Request to Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations and public hearing, presentation, consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for the F.S. Kapchinski Subdivision, Lot 12, Block 1, consisting of two lots on 0.478 acres, located at 1612 Park Place. Applicant: Ali Jaffar, agent for owner Ricky Wilborn Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Replat provided that the variance request is approved by the Commission. Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a variance request to Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations, Platting and Replatting in Older Residential Subdivisions. The regulations require that specific criteria be met if a replat creates a new lot in a subdivision that was created prior to July 15, 1970. All lots shown on the replat must meet the following criteria: • Meet or exceed the average width of the lots in the block • Contain at least 8,500 square feet of area The proposed lots exceed the 8,500 square foot minimum cited above. According to the applicant, the average width of the lots in the block has been determined to be 59.16 feet. The Applicant is seeking to plat two lots, each with a width of 52.2 feet. A variance has been requested to the width of the lots (see Section 5 Variances included below and supporting variance information with the application). The newly created lots would exceed the required 50 foot minimum lot width for R-1 Single-Family Residential zoning. A home exists on the property and would not encroach into setbacks created by the new property lines. Prior to the adoption of Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations, numerous properties in the area were resubdivided. Since Section 18 was adopted in 2002, there have been two other variance requests to this ordinance in the F.S. Kapchinski Subdivision and both have been granted. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: This area is designated as Single- Family Residential, High Density on the Land Use Plan (7-9 dwelling units per acre). The variance is in compliance with the Land Use Plan. • • Since one lot already exists, Parkland Dedication will be due on the one newly created lot prior to filing the plat. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the final plat. The Commission must first rule on the variance request. The options regarding the variance request are: ^ Approval ^ Denial If approved, the Commission can take action on the plat. The options regarding the final plat are: ^ Approval ^ Denial Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial 3. Application & supporting information 4. Subdivision Regulations Section 5: Variances 5. Copy of Final Plat NOTIFICATION: • Legal Notice Publication: The Eagle; 3-1-05 Advertised Commission Hearing Date: 3-17-05 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 24 Response Received: None as of date of staff report. • • SECTION 5: VARIANCES 5-A The Commission may authorize a variance from the regulation when, in their opinion, undue hardship will result from requiring strict compliance. In granting a variance, the Commission shall prescribe only conditions that it deems not prejudicial to the public interest. In making the findings herein before required, the Commission shall take into account the nature of the proposed use of the land involved, the existing use of land in the vicinity, the number of persons who will reside or work in the proposed subdivision, the possibility that a nuisance will be created, and the probable effect of such variance upon traffic conditions and upon public health, convenience, and welfare of the vicinity. No variance shall be granted unless the Commission finds: 5-A.1 That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; 5-A.2 That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; 5-A.3 That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to • the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and 5-A.4 That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. 5-B Such findings of the Commission, together with the specific facts upon which such findings are based, shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the meetings at which such variance is granted. Variances may be granted only when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter so that public health, safety, and welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. • ~ ^~' ~ ~ O ~ p 0'~ q~ ^ ~ \~ O ~J Z~ 8 ~ F ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~ >~ oy Q \~^~\ v Q \~' ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^~ - ~. ~ c d~ ~ I b \1~ ~~ ~ y N ,~ ~ p spy ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ o 6O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ m U ^ ~ ~ "' (O ^- ~~ ,tie °~ ~ o r ~ ~p o \foy\ \~`L'P ti Q. a ~0 0 ~ ~, r~ O \6ti1 \6,~a\b ti h ^ `~ ~ ~p\ ^ ~ h (v ^'7 ~ ^' ~~ \ ^I ~ ~ \~~ ^ R.' ~, 6 o d g~ °o `' °j •nO.o 9!L ~ ~ 30~ 9~z w to ., 6~~ 210 Fiz ~ o ~ ~~ ~ v ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o `n m °j a \6pA toy ~o ~ ~ a o ~ dJ ~ o`' ti a y ~ \ \`~ ^ ^~ ~~ a \ ~ ~ , ~~ h \6 iyoy'~~ ~~~ `MHO ~ 0\6~0 ~ i~s~lG~'~ `~' ^ N Z g ^ Qo\y\y \ \y\a `O,n, ~b toy, 009! ~ y\'~ ,~ ~° o ^\ \y\ ~O ~~ F09! 1091 2 ~ ^ \y\ e ~ ~ ~ ~ h\ ~ o ~~ t ~ 1 ~ -~J ~ ~ ~ ~ o ,r, ~ypy '• o ypy \ ~ ~ ~ \~y o~ ~ m N \y0 A ~ 20F VJU~..1 \~~ \o~ ,,,~ \p1 1~ cp \oy ~ \o'' ~~~ ~~ ^ o ^ O9 SI,~ o, t y~ ~ ~ ~ k\1 ~ ~ ^ p0\ ~ ~~ ~ O~~ ^ 0.~ A\~' ~ ~ ~~y J~ ~ ~~1~ ~~ ~i p0\ Q'po~ a ^'7 ~ ~~~~ ~~.~yy ~ ~ ~~ ~ 6' i~l k~ ^ ~ r 0 ~ O 6Od/~ ~ ~ ~ O lod! ~t1 Q ,~\\ d'bo, o ~ yob ,\o^ o ~ ~o Q ~ ~ ~ ~~ ^ o TY OF COLLEGE STATION Plrtnning d' Development Strvices .3D FOR OFFICE USE ONLY P8Z CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: FFNAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending ^ Final ^ Vacating (~Replat (i3oo.o0) (S3oo.o0) (S4oo.o0) {Saoo.oo) ~ssoo.oo)* 'Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $'t00 (if applicable) Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed). Application completed in full. ~ Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). Thirteen (13} folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat andlor one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). ' ~/. Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ~ A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of Date of Preapplication Conference: ~~ ~~ NAME OF SUBDIVISION SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot 8 Block) ~ ~ r% ~~ ~ f o APPLICANT/PROQQJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (P 'mary Contact for the Project}: Name T, ~- ~~ r! (~ v2 Street Address city State Zip Code Phone Number PROPERTY OW/nN~ER'S.INFORMATION: Name /~t G- ~' ^. I ~ , E-Mail Address Fax Number Street Address o~ S ~/~ ~ 'LS ~ `-- ~~ g ~G;/t City ~~l State ~ ~~. Zip Code G E-Mail Address A. ~ (~ ~ i /C S ~. ~~y~~~-•e~ Phone Number ~L~ `f° ~ ~ e Fax Number ~Z~ ~, ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMA • Name 1 ~ ~I Street Address State ~ ~ Zip Code 1 ~ gd City h E-Mail Address ~K,a n /-vi i dK, Phone Number _,~7 ~ S ~ ~ T' ~ Fax Number ~ ~ S ~ ~ 1(- Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so; please provide the Volume and Page # creage ~ Total Property ~ . y= ~ ~ ~, Total # Of Lots _ R-O-W Acreage pD , sting Use: F..S t ~~~ ~ ~ ~ Proposed Use: Number Of Lots By Zoning District / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: Floodplain Acreage A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations 8~ Reason For Same: ~``~6'.~'~ wy1 ~ ~,~~ Requested Oversize Participation: Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: Streets Sidewalks Sanitary Sewer Lines Water Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 =$ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, con'ect, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenar-ts or restrictions associated with this plat. ~gnature and Title Date 02/25/2005 16:13 FAX 9797752873 ~Y~ gents C~rlo~~~»gn~~ •1''rr~ial~ent CARLOMAGNO SURVEYING X002 ~~~~O~i~~~o S~,rve~in~.lnc. a-- ---~ 2714 Fitifeather Bryan, Phone (979) 775 -2873 Fax (979) 775-4787 To: City of College Station Planning and )5evelopment TX 77,301 Etna - CS~Carloma~gnoSutveying.com www. CarlomagnoSurveyiug.com J~ We are requesting a variance for lot width for a repIa~ of Lot 12 in the Kapchinski Subdivision where the average lot width is 59.16 feet wide. The width of lots 12A and 12B once replatted will be 52.2 feet wide Thank you, Dante Carlomagno Texas Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 1562 • Thursday, February 24, 2005 1 • 02/24/2005 15:41 FAX 9797752873 CARLOMAGNO SURVEYING Carlomagno Surveying Inc. 2714 Pinfeather • Bryan TX 77801 LOT WIDTH DETERt+AINATION Lot # Block Lot Width Lot # Block Lot Width 1 A 1 52.34 1 B 1 52.32 14-R-1 1 52.13 2A 1 52.32 14 1 52.20 26 1 52.32 15R1 1 72.41 3A 1 52.32 15R2 1 60.00 5A 1 52.75 15R3 1 75.92 56 1 52.75 23 1 57.50 6A 1 42.00 24 1 54.50 6 B 1 42.00 25 1 54.50 9R 1 57.35 26 1 70.23 10R 1 57.35 27 1 119.00 7R 1 50.00 16A1 2 132.00 8R 1 50.00 16A2 2 32.00 19R 1 42.00 16B 2 80.00 17 1 101.00 15 2 80.00 18A 1 52.20 14 2 80.00 186 1 52.20 13 2 80.00 11 A 1 52.20 12 2 75.90 11 B 1 52.20 11 2 45.00 12A 1 52.20 10 2 45.00 12B 1 52.10 9 2 45.00 • 13 1 52.00 Total 1121.58 Total 1363.29 2484.87 =Combined Total Average = 59.16 Dante Carlomagno Texas Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 1562 (979)775-2873 (979)775-4787 Fax ~ 002 • • F.S. Kapchinski Replat -Variance Information Please note that we will like you to take the following points into consideration for our variance request on 1612 Park Place Replat. The commission has approved several variances in the area which has greatly enhanced the overall neighborhood. Without subdividing the property we will not be able to redevelop this lot. Additionally 32 out of the 43 lots in that area are currently below the average lot width with only 11 lots significantly affecting the overall average width. Thank you, Sincerely, Ali ]affar • • • SECTION 5: VARIANCES 5-A The Commission may authorize a variance from the regulation when, in their opinion, undue hardship will result from requiring strict compliance. In granting a variance, the Commission shall prescribe only conditions that it deems not prejudicial to the public interest. In making the findings herein before required, the Commission shall take into account the nature of the proposed use of the land involved, the existing use of land in the vicinity, the number of persons who will reside or work in the proposed subdivision, the possibility that a nuisance will be created, and the probable effect of such variance upon traffic conditions and upon public health, convenience, and welfare of the vicinity. No variance shall be granted unless the Commission finds: 5-A.1 That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; 5-A.2 That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; 5-A.3 That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in • the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and 5-A.4 That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. 5-B Such findings of the Commission, together with the specific facts upon which such findings are based, shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the meetings at which such variance is granted. Variances may be granted only when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter so that public health, safety, and welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. • Regular Agenda Item 8 Variance Case #OS-26 (MH/CC) • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Date: March 17. 2005 Email: mhitchcock@cstx.gov Item: Public hearing, consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Variance from Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations for Lots 62 A and B and 63 A and B and public hearing, consideration, discussion and possible action on a Replat for Richards Subdivision Lots 61, 62, and a portion of 63 consisting of five lots on 0.845 acres generally located on the south side of Sterling Street near its intersection with Crest Street. Applicant: Louise Fischer of Kerr Surveying, agent for owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Replat provided that the variance request is approved by the Commission. Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a variance request to Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations regarding Platting and Replatting in Older Residential Subdivisions. The ordinance requires that when a replat is submitted for a lot where the original subdivision was created before July 15, 1970 and the replat creates a new lot, all lots shown on the plat must meet two criteria: ^ All lots on the plat must meet or exceed the average width of the lots in the block, and ^ All lots on the plat must contain a minimum 8,500 sq.ft. The original plat for Richards Subdivision created all lots approximately 104 feet by 104 feet. The minimum lot allowed in R-1 is 50 by 100 feet. Numerous properties in the area have been resubdivided over the years. According to the applicant, the current average width of the platted lots on Sterling is 58.12 feet. Four of the resulting lots from this replat (Lots 62A, 626, 63A, and 63B) would be approximately 55-ft wide containing 6026 - 6093 sq.ft. each; therefore, the variance request is for both provisions contained in the ordinance-lot width and lot area for these lots. Proposed Lot 61A meets the requirements of Section 18 and therefore does not require a variance. A home exists on the property and would not encroach into setbacks created by the new property lines. Since Section 18 was adopted in 2002, there have been three variance requests to the ordinance in the Richards Subdivision and all have been granted. As the applicant has stated in the attached variance request, the resubdivision of the original lots in the Richards Subdivision has not been uncommon, and the resulting lot sizes are in compliance with R-1 Single Family lot size standards. The Comprehensive Plan shows this area as single-family residential high density (7-9 dwelling units per acre). The variance is in compliance with the Land Use Plan. Parkland dedication (fees) is required before the plat is finally approved or filed in the Brazos County Deed Records. S~ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The Commission must consider the variance request prior to approving the replat. Commission options regarding the variance request: ^ Approval or ^ Denial. Commission options regarding the replat: The Commission has final authority over the final replat. The options regarding the final replat are: ^ Approval with conditions; ^ Approval as submitted; or ^ Denial. ipporting Materials: Location Map Aerial Application Subdivision Regulations Section 5: Variances Copy of Final Replat NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 3-1-05 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 3-17-05 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 28 Response Received: Two neighboring property owners have called and are not opposed to the variance and replat. • a~~ ~' ~ a a ,_ ~ ~. j O s~~~p ~oP ~o ~ ~~a 'rOs ~O ~ 1 6 v V ~nu^un~ nnn~ lnuv[) ~ I~~I v ~ _ ~ a~ 0 Q Q 0 Q v nn~ ~ u I~7 ~ V a ~2s ~~ .Z E fi1U<-7W J~ cPR~'~ ° ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~~N e o h ~ ~~ ~, ~PR~M `° b ~ ~J ^ h a ~ g Z ~ ~' r ~ ` ,"~, g ~ ~ N CSJ ~`3+ , ~ .~- r ~~ ~ o, ~'~ ~,l ti 1 p5 y o ~ ~ r N ~I e ~ ~a ~, 24p} ~p~ 24p, N ~. ~ «rz r p~ c~ct ~ ' 2402 ^ oi ~ l 1 ~rl ~ h v g ~ ,,,~ o ~ b U Z h a ~ ~ ~ V O o ~ i ~ on ~ oo O^ q a ~ M Q ~ o ~ ~D o~ I..~ ~ O d/ if. b O O/~ ~ ~ O q0 ~ P p \ ,y N ~~ ~ `?' `~ N ~ a' r~ ~, ~ ~ ~~` h i~ "~ o .r 9~~ b ~ or ~ "' V t ~~ '~J~ j ~ ~ ~ ~v .cpr ~ u ~ m sr ~ ~ o ~+ ~\~ ~ gr `~' ~ ~ ~ or ~ ~' ~ Q o ~ ~ ~~~ Qo rOy G~ ~ a m ~~ ~ ~ o ,n~~ li ~ ~ti ~ S` ~ti O ~ A d r °~t ^ ~ ~, ~ 6~~ byJ J~ ao r/ cp v , -~ o ~ O Q ~~ b O ' /1 ._ o Q ~ sow ~b~ t ~ o ~ ~~ . ~~oy ~, z ~ I ~~ COLLEGE STATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY P&Z Case No.: ~~~ ^ a" , Date Submitted: ~ ~ ~~ ` u~ d n w~ FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ^ Amending ^ Final ^ Vacating ~ Replat ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)* *Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for PB~Z Commission n~nci~n~9+inn MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Final plat review and filing fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets ~ $55.00 per additional sheet Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) Development permit fee of $200.00 (if applicable). ~r Infrastructure inspection fee of $600.00 (applicable If any public Infrastructure is being constructed) ~ All replats must be accompanied with a copy of the deed restrictions/covenants for this plat. Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) ~ One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). ® Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). NAME OF SUBDIVISION aiChl~Irds ~i~iV'n SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) ~'S !~ 1~ loa+- R~ 03 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name I~rr~uryeyi na E-Mail ~OUise. Fisch r ~Veriz~r-, n~1` Street Address S05 (°hurch 5'~ ~ -- City ~ ~~ S`~r-r~--cm State ~ 5 Zip Code 7~~U Phone Number ~Co~'~f4S Fax Number ~ -~7'90~-I CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet, if necessary) Name ~ ~nd,ei~ Son~eS E-Mail Street Address f~a (~721~ n fir' City ~~~~~ ~ ~P ~~~(=turf State TZcQ,S Zip Code ~'7~~10 Phone Number (n4(~- ~ II Fax Number ~~ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name - E-Mail Street Address City Phone Number State Zip Code Fax Number 1 of 5 Acreage Total Property ~ • g~~ Total # Of Lots ~~ R-O-W Acreage N~~ sting Use: ~P51ca~en~-iaa Proposed Use: rPSZC~~en"~~0.>t Number Of Lots By Zoning District 5 / / / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: p,139 / Floodplain Acreage ~+~ A Statement Addressing Any Differences Between The Final Plat And Approved Master Development Plan And/Or Preliminary Plat (If Applicable): Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: e~CiS~in~n S'~fUG~yy'eS encroach in'1v Seel- b0. ~ ones - st~tioo~cks eS+~lolCshecl o~f+cr s~~fvv-w~ wur~ ~l~- y Aldi~ (vtwidfh/size Requested Oversize Participation: S,e~ a~<.hed ~,et4er Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: Streets ~_ Sidewalks Sanitary Sewer Lines Water Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention OR # of acres in greenways FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ # of Multi-Family Dwelling Units X $452 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associa~t/ed with this plat. '^ .-!~~~_ ~~~~~ Signature and Title Date 2of5 be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. ~, COLLEGE STATION SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 13 FOLDED COPIES OF PLAT FOR REVIEW FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIR MMENTS (ALL CITY NOT LIMITED TAO THE FOLLOWING: INCLUDING BU (Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers. ,~' 1. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch or larger. [~ 2. Vicinity map which includes enough of surr nd ds Cit r Lim ts.h No sca eraequiaeld but incbude north property in relationship to College Station a Y arrow. ~- 3. Title Block with the following information: [~}- Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveoyoed [,~. Proposed name of subd9111OnRe latslneed toaetain original subdiv scion name.) through Brazos County ) ( P [~}- Date of preparation. [~ Engineer's scale in feet. [~' Total area intended to be developed. [~- 4. North Arrow. [~ 5. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. ^ 6. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. ~- 7. All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat. [~]-- Ownership and Dedication [~.. Surveyor and/or Engineer 0-. City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat) [, Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat) [~- Brazos County Clerk royal ETJ Plats only) ^ Brazos County Commissioners Court App [~- 8. Paid tax certificates. ~. 9. If submitting a replat where there are exissiu elthat no encroachments wit be coreated ubject property showing the improvements to en ^ 10. If using private septic systems, add a generaout the ssua nce of a Incense by the B9azoscCountyy be installed on any lot in this subdivision with Health Unit under the provisions of the private fans-toy Sectiotn 21.004pof the Texas WatersCode's Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provlslo •~~. 11. Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available data. [~. 12. Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data. ~-- 13. Matches the approved preliminary plat and/or master development plan. 4of5 ~ 14. The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle,. degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision). Existing Proposed [~' ^ Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. [~- ^ Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) ^ ^ Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. ^ ^ Alleys. [~' ^ Easements. ^ [-}- A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block. ^ ^ Greenbelt area/park linkages/parkland dedication (All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board prior to P & Z Commission consideration.) ^ 15. Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following: ^ Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other utilities). ^ Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) ^ Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) ^ Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design, channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage layout of the subdivision. ^ Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E. ^ Drainage Report. ^ Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans). ^ 16. All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed. Separate instrument easements must be filed prior or concurrently with Final Plat. [' 17. Are there impact fees associated with this development? ^ Yes ,~' No Impact fees for R-1, R-2, & R-3 zoned final plats, must be paid prior to filing. ~ 18. Will any construction occur in TexDOT rights-of-way? ^ Yes ~ No If yes, TexDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents. NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2, If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOI) must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST 5 of 6 CQCS Annlication 5/16/2003 • SECTION b: VARIANCES The Commission may authorize a variance from the regulation when, in their opinion, undue hardship will result from requiring strict compliance. In granting a variance, the Commission shall prescribe only conditions that it deems not prejudicial to the public interest. In making the findings herein before required, the Commission shall take into account the nature of the proposed use of the land involved, the existing use of land in the vicinity, the number of persons who will reside or work in the proposed subdivision, the possibility that a nuisance will be created, and the probable effect of such variance upon traffic conditions and upon public health, convenience, and welfare of the vicinity. No variance shall be granted unless the Commission finds: ,5~1 That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; 5_-a3 That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and 4 Thet the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. 5.~ Such findings of the Commission, together with the specific facts upon which such findings are based, shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the meetings at which such variance is granted. Variances may be granted only when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter so that public health, safety, and welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. • Regular Agenda Item 9 Final Plat and Replat Case #04-269 (JR/AG) MEMORANDUM March 1, 2005 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jennifer Reeves Email: jreeves@cstx.gov SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT AND REPEAT OF THE UNIVERSITY TOWN CENTER SUBDIVISION (FP-REPEAT) Item: Public hearing, consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat and Replat of the University Town Center Subdivision (FP-Replat) consisting of 4 lots on 20.02 acres generally located south of the intersection of University Drive and Tarrow Drive East. (04-00500269) Applicant: David Scarmardo, Sahara Reality Group, Ltd., property owner • Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of this request as submitted. -Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Final Plat and Replat of the University Town Center Subdivision. This is a "clean-up" plat to consolidate previously unplatted acreage and replat portions of the Henton Subdivision and One Lincoln Place Subdivision. This property is within the City Limits of College Station and bounded by University Drive to the north, a vacant tract to the west, a restaurant and hotel to the east, and town homes and vacant land to the south. Public Utility Easements are proposed to satisfy associated Site Plan development. An Easement Abandonment was approved by the City Council on February 22, 2005 to abandon easements from which electric facilities have been removed. Each of the proposed lots has access to University Drive through joint access easements. On December 21, 2004, the City Council approved a request to rezone the southern portion of this property from R-1 to C-1. With all four tracts being C-1, this allows for the development of the proposed commercial shopping center and multiple restaurant development known as the University Town Center. • Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates this • property as Retail Regional. C-1 General Commercial is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. This Final Plat and Replat are in conformance with the Thoroughfare Plan, as it does not depict the extension of any thoroughfares or any additional Right-of- way. With regard to Special Area Plans, this property is within the University Drive Overlay. Budgetary 8~ Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Area map 2. Application 3. Copy of Plat r~ • 3 I v U _ o' C.... x o o ~ o. `ti ~ ~ ~ w : ti r w ~, ~ .. o~ o q~Ro ~ S~. u, O ~:~:~:~ ~ K 6 ~o a ~:~cv:~:~'~'• TA W ST ~ 6 .•.•.• ..•:~.•:•:•'•:•:•:•:•:•:•: .• h ~ A o~ ::.: d. .:. • r -~~j'Y~ p ~ may ~ ~7 .:~:E~:::::~•~•~~: ': ~ yti ~ ;.~;::::::.• :•~: y~ ~ ~ _.~•:•:•. ~ ~ a • :::::::::::::::::~:~: ~ z :::::;::: ti ti A ':e:l ~: ::•:~ ~ O ':':'• 0.'• ~ h,•.• O ti ~ ;'f?';'.• ~•.'; ti V O ••~•.•.•.•••: b ~ •:•Z7;.•.•.•.•:•:•••: ~ ~ o :: ~ ' ~: 7N ~ •:~•;•:•:•••'• ~-1 U ~ O ':•1i'~::. a •••6*:• ti W 1 V O••• •.• Y'. ~ •j ro ~ :•:: ~~~-~ v~ cn•: ::o ;:o;:, ~• : ~:: •~~• ~~: ti ~ ~~: ~ 0 ::~•••••': •:::. •. . ~ ~~ p •.o•.•.•. y~'~'•'.• ~ ~ :::>j;::::: ~ w ~ O :•~~.::~ ~ ~ ~ : ~~. ~ ® - ~ ~a v ti ~ v ti ~ ti °, ,pp ti ~ ~ ~~ c„ SAC. rn o~ ~ J ~ ~ ••••••••••• ••••••.•. ~" ~ ~ ~ .. ti ~o ti ~ ~ ~; y ;:;.• •::. .•:~:;: FOR OFFICE,tUSF~RNnL~ P8Z CASE NO.: ~ ~ ~ ~/ DATE SUBMITTED: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION ~ ~~ (Check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending ^ Final ^ Vacating ® Replat (5300.00) (5300.00) (5400.00) (5400.00) (5600.00)" •Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: X Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) X Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). X Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any pu lic infrastructure is being constructed) X Application completed in full. ~" S`"b'^^`~'}~~ a~3~°y ~ ~°Izai~ Y~,tz-Nteye,~ Drivsw4y Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). X Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). , X Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). NA Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). pate of Preapplication Conference: May 10, 2004 and September 13, 2004 NAME OF SUBDIVISION Replat of Lots 3R and 4R Henton Subdivision and One Lincoln Place SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) 800 Universitv Drive -the southeast comer of Tarrow Street E. and Universitv Drive APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name David Scarmardo -Sahara Realtv GroUD, Ltd. Street Address 1289 N. Harvey Mitchell Parkway City Brvan State TX Zip Code 77803 Phone Number 979-779-7209 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: E-Mail Address davidCcDscarmardofoods.com Fax Number 979-822-1763 Name Same Street Address State Phone Number Zip Code ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: E-Mail Address Fax Number City Name Kling Engineering & Surveying Street Address 4101 S. Texas Ave. Suite A City Brvan • State TX Zip Code 77802 Phone Number 979-846-6212 6/13/03 E-Mail Address stewartCcDklingeng.com Fax Number 979-846-8252 1 of S Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page # Acreage ~ Total Property 17.7 Total # Of Lots 3 R-O-W Acreage none Existing Use: vacant Proposed Use: Restaurant and retail shonpino umber Of Lots By Zoning District 3 / C-1 / / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: Floodplain Acreage A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations 8 Reason For Same: Requested Oversize Participation: Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: Streets Sidewalks 1624 Sanitary Sewer Lines 2670 Water Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 =$ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. ig re n i e ~~ ~~,~~ • 0 Date 6/13/03 2 of S SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION •pplication is hereby made for the following development specific site/waterway alterations: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: I, ~ ~o/ /N ~~~1' ,design engineer/~ereby acknowledge or affirm that: The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the Ci of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards. As con n of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this plica 'on ~~m o these currents and the requirements of Chapter 13 of the College Station City Code. / G'!/ Property wner(s) Contractor CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas.) A.I, certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm. Engineer Date I, certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any asement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended. Engineer Date C. I, ,certify that the alterations or development covered by this permit shall not diminish the flood-carrying capacity of the waterway adjoining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent with requirements of the City of College Station City Code, Chapter 13 concerning encroachments of floodways and of floodway fringes. Engineer Date D. I, , do certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level of the 100 year flood above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study. Engineer Conditions or comments as part of approval: Date In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage acilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City ngineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall PPIY• 6/13/03 3 of S ~~ IOLLEfI STATION SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 13 FOLDED COPIES OF PLAT FOR REVIEW FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers. [~/ 1. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch or larger. 2. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow. `~ 3. Title Block with the following information: (~ Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos County 911.) (Replats need to retain original subdivision name.) Date of preparation. ~_ a+~,, 7 ~~ ~ ~' I~ "~' . ~' ~_ ~) Engineer's scale in feet. Total area intended to be developed. North Arrow. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. ~~ S~-~•~ ~~1~ S~w7~ ~- ~~r~. S.v~ Imo All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat. l'~cl~ ~/ Ownership and Dedication ~'v~~ ~ /Surveyor and/or Engineer / City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat) /Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat) '~ / Brazos County Clerk --8-- Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only) 8. Paid tax certificates. 9. If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created. 10. If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's J Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.004 of the Texas Water Code. ~~ 11. Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and floodway~, if applicable, according to the most recent available data. ~] ~ 12. Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data. 13. Matches the approved preliminary plat and/or master development plan. 6/13/03 4 of S ,~~ 14. The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the . following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision). Existing Proposed ~ ~• Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp tum around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. ~ '~~ Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) ~'~` ~~ Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. 1~1,~• ~----~- Alleys. ® ®°~ Easements. ® ®-~ A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block. (~6,1~. ~-- Greenbelt area/park linkages/parkland dedication (All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board prior to P & Z Commission consideration.) ® 15. Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following: Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other utilities). ~] Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the • utility master plan and any future growth areas.) [~~' Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design, channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage layout of the subdivision. ^ Detailed cost estimates for all public infr structure listed above sealed by Texas P.E. $ Drainage Report. Iv ~ ~~~~t2c~1,. ~G`~, Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans). ~~~-8- 16. All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed. Separate instrument easements must be filed prior or concurrently with Final Plat. 17. Are there impact fees associated with this development? ^ Yes [~ No Impact fees for R-1, R-2, & R-3 zoned final plats, must be paid prior to filing. 18. Will any construction occur in TexDOT rights-of-way? Yes ^ No If yes, TexDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents. NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to • filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOI) must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit. 6/13/03 5 of 5