The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/03/2005 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission• FILE COPY CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d Development Services AGENDA Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, February 3, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. Administrative Conference Room, City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 2. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff. Castlegate Section 5 Phase 1 - 04-08 (CC) Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding updates on the hike and bike task force. C7 • 4. Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding future revisions to the comprehensive plan. 5. Consideration, discussion and possible action regarding status of Planning and Zoning Commission Plan of Work. 6. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy map be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 7. Adjourn Consultation with Attomev {Gov't Code fiction 551071,) ; uossible action The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice fmm its attomey regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attomey~]ient privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attomey-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign iaterpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979-764-3517 or (I'DD) 1-800-735- 2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website ham://www.cstS.QOV and Cable Access Channel 19. • Workshop Agenda 4 Comprehensive Plan • • MEMORANDUM DATE: January 26, 2005 TO: Planning & Zoning Commissioners FROM: Joey Dunn, AICP, Director of Planning & Development Services SUBJECT: College Station Comprehensive Plan This memo has been prepared in support of the workshop discussion item concerning the need and merits of revising the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan was prepared by a consultant, HOK, which commenced in 1994 and was adopted in 1997, and in the last 10 years a plethora of changes have occurred in our community and region which will be identified below. Section 8.03 of the Comprehensive Plan, not included in the widely distributed Development Guide, identifies implementation strategies of the plan's Goals and Objectives. Section 8.07 addresses • Comprehensive Plan Updates, and acknowledges that, "while most plans indicate a timeframe for their projections (usually 20 years), it makes good sense to revise and update it before the end of that timeframe...depending on changing conditions, the City may consider a `major tune-up' of the Comprehensive Plan somewhere near its tenth anniversary." The Plan also advocates a number of additional methods for maintaining the Comprehensive Plan in the interim in which staff has undertaken numerous revisions to the Plan since that include, but not limitPrl tn• • Small area plans • Neighborhood action plans • Special interest plans • Comprehensive plan amendments (includes applicant initiated amendments) Another implementation strategy suggests the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council should schedule joint workshops where the City staff provides updates regarding needed adjustments to the Comprehensive Plan affording the City to have the tools to react more effectively to new development proposals. Such workshops have occurred periodically; last year, City staff, the • P&Z and City Council considered an extensive UDO and Comprehensive Plan Annual Table 1: College Station Population (1940-2004) In no decade has College Station experienced less than 29% growth and has historically sustained at least 3% average annual growth. Growth •. . ~- •- 1940 2,148 NA NA 1950 7,925 268.95% 27% 1960 11,396 43.80% 4% 1970 17,676 55.11% 6% 1980 37,272 110.86% 11% 1990 52,456 40.74% 4% 2000 67,890 29.42% 3% 2004" 80,214 18.15% 2% Notes: 1. Source: U.S. Census http://www.census.gov 2. Source: Planning and Development Services Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 9 1/28/2005 • Review item. The proposed draft Plan of Work being considered by you also includes provisions for joint meetings with City Council as well as the City of Bryan's Planning & Zoning Commission. The purpose of the following is to illustrate some key forces affecting the growth and development of College Station and should be integrated into ongoing and future comprehensive planning efforts. The Plan originally proposed three alternative growth and development scenarios resulting in a preferred scenario which became the basis for the new land use plan. Alternative thoroughfare plan scenarios were also considered. The land use plan scenarios included: • Scenario #1 represented a `concentric-circle' approach growth and density with higher densities proposed closer to the University, with medium and lower densities occurring as development moves (south) along SH 6 further away from the developed `core' area. • Scenario #2 represented a`linear-band' approach utilizing SH 6 as the spine for a development corridor and dissipate medium and low density development along the corridor. It generally represented an extension of the community's development pattern over the past 20 years (1975-1995). • Scenario #3 combined an increase in University-area density and redevelopment with a `dispersed village/neighborhood' style of development in the area between SH 6 and Wellborn Road. • The Preferred Scenario was described as an overall preference for #2, with some aspects of #3. • In 2003, long range planning staff completed a "Growth Study" of College Station that analyzed extensive demographic, land use data, and historical growth patterns to initiate dialogue related to the City's annexation policies future options to accommodate anticipated population growth. This study also considered various growth and development scenarios. With current and anticipated platting activity occurring in the City Limits and in the ETJ, concerns arose regarding a greater need to consider infill development and weigh-in on attitudes about developing in a denser pattern. This issue remains as a work item on the Council's Strategic Plan for our department and has substantial funding ($60,000) associated with it for land surveying and property owner notifications as necessary. In 2003, the U.S. Census Bureau reevaluated MSA or Metropolitan Statistical Area boundaries. College Station's continued progression toward serving the Brazos Valley as a regional hub was recognized by renaming the one-county Bryan-College Station MSA as the College Station-Bryan MSA and adding Burleson and Robertson counties. This is generally based on the fact that College Station population surpassed that of Bryan, and commuting patterns indicating economic interaction. A renewed comprehensive planning exercise would enable the City to begin to address a myriad of community-wide, if not regional, issues that are before us, including but not limited to the following: • Annexation policies and growth form (density) • Water/waste-water extensions • ETJ Development Pressure • Direction for Redevelopment land use designations on the Land Use Plan along Texas Avenue • Simplification of the land use plan resulting in emphasis on the Plan's text (goals, objectives, policies; i.e. the plan would not identify parcels. • Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 9 1/28/2005 • • Ability (or inability) to address multi-modal transportation opportunities through land use planning • Emphasis on nodal, or transit-oriented, development • Development of indicators to regularly measure progress of plan implementation • Relationships of enrollments and related growth at TAMU and Blinn College as well as effects of related housing, parking and transportation policies upon the City Given the time that has lapsed since the adoption of the existing Comprehensive Plan, the number of interim changes undertaken, sustained medium to high rates of population growth and related indicators, staff believes the needs and merits for a fully revised comprehensive plan are apparent and steps to proceed with the development of a request for qualifications process should be initiated soon. By doing so, we can dovetail with the upcoming City Council retreat to review the Strategic Plan and consider future fiscal obligations that would be incurred on the front end of the City's budget planning process for FY 2005-2006. For your reference, a sample of data has been assembled on the following pages and includes the figures and tables showing population, employment, and development activity. • • Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 9 1/28/2005 • • Table 2: Bryan-College Station MSA Population Overview (1990-2004) As of 2003, College Station-Bryan MSA now includes three counties, Brazos, Burleson and Robertson. College Station appears to be on a path of continuing to be the largest city in the regio n. Our success also seems to propel regional growth as the CS-B MSA population g rew over 50% since 1990. Geography Brazos County Bryan College Station Kurten Millican Wixon Valley Burleson County Caldwell Snook Somerville Robertson County Bremond Calvert Franklin Hearne Incorporated Population Unincorporated Population Total MSA Population Notes 1. Source: U.S. Census Bureau http://www.ce nsus.gov 2. Source: Texas State Data Center http://txsdc.tamu.edu Population (1) population percent Share 1980-2000 Estimate (2) 152,415 121,862 161,779 82.90% 82.44% 100.00% 25.07% 65,660 55,002 69,146 35.43% 35.51% 45.13% 19.38% 67,890 52,456 73,691 37.76% 36.72% 43.05% 29.42% 227 NA 233 0.12% 0.12% #VALUE! NA 108 NA 110 0.06% 0.06% #VALUE! NA 235 186 229 0.12% 0.13% 0.15% 26.34% 16,470 13,625 17,615 9.03% 8.91 % NA 20.88% 3,449 3,181 3,664 1.88% 1.87% NA 8.43% 568 489 569 0.29% 0.31 % NA 16.16% 1,704 1,542 1,704 0.87% 0.92% NA 10.51% 16,000 15,511 15,747 8.07% 8.65% NA 3.15% 876 1,110 864 0.44% 0.47% NA -21.08% 1,426 1,536 1,390 0.71% 0.77% NA -7.16% 1,470 1,336 1,478 0.76% 0.80% NA 10.03% 4,690 5,132 4,460 2.29% 2.54% NA -8.61% 148,076 107,644 157,538 80.73% 80.09% 88.33% 37.56% 22,409 14,218 37,603 19.27% 12.12% 11.67% 57.61% 184,885 121,862 195,141 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 51.72% • Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 of 9 1/28/2005 • • Table 3: HOK Population Projections Population projections generated by the consultant preparing the Comprehensive Plan in the mid 1990s estimated College Station's population to be approximately 58,000, and projected the 2000 Census to be between 64,000-70,500. Our 2000 Census population registered 67,890, narrowly surpassing the 3% projection. According to our most recent population estimate for the end of 2004 (80,214), we are on target for the 3 to 4 percent range. 1995 58,000 58,000 58,000 2000 64,000 67,200 70,500 2005 70,700 78,000 85,800 2010 78,000 90,400 104,400 2015 86,200 104,700 127,000 Figure 1: College Station Population Projections We project College Station's population to be between 83,000 and 102,000 in 2010. 110,000 100,000 90,000 p 80,000 i+ .o a a 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 • I -+- Recorded Growth ~- 2000-2003 growth 1990-2000 growth -~ -1990-2003 growth Planning & Zoning Commission Page 7 of 9 1/28/2005 • • Table 4: Historical Employment Growth (1990-2004) According to the Texas Workforce Commission, Brazos County has experienced each year since 1990. Historic Employment Growth (1990-2004) 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Notes: 1. Source: Texas Workforce Commission B/CS MSA Coile a Station .• .- 83,575 3.2% 33,249 3.2% 80,965 3.0% 32,210 3.0% 78,603 2.2% 31,271 2.2% 76,928 1.1 % 30,605 1.1 76,091 2.1% 30,271 2.1% 74,513 2.3% 29,644 2.3% 72,813 5.1% 28,968 5.1% 69,281 2.6% 27,562 2.6% 67,528 0.9% 26,865 0.9% 66,951 0.3% 26,635 0.3% 66,774 3.1% 26,565 3.1% 64,740 3.9% 25,756 3.9% 62,299 3.5% 24,785 3.5% 60,219 3.3% 23,957 3.3% 58, 314 NA 23,199 NA • Planning & Zoning Commission Page 8 of 9 1/28/2005 • C Figure 2: Platting Activity (2000-2004) Increasing numbers of platted lots have been occurring in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Total Plats 1200 1000 800 a w ° soo E z 400 200 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Year ^ City Plats ^ ETJ Plats • Planning & Zoning Commission Page 9 of 9 ]/28/2005 • • Figure 3: Single-family Permits, 1980-2004 Since 1992, College Station has permitted at least 300 new single-family dwellings each year. Since the current plan's adoption in 1997, 3,921 single-family homes have been permitted. Much of this development has occurred in southern College Station between Wellborn Road and SH 6 and along Greens Prairie Road. 800 80% 700 ~ 600 600 40% 500 200 400 ~ 0% .. 300 -20% 200 -400 100 -60% .. 0 -80% 00 0~ Off' 00 Off` 0~ QUO 0~ 00 4°~ 00 O~ O~ O~ 0~` 0~ OHO O'l 00 O°~ 00 O~ Off' O~ Off` ~ Single Family Homes ~"'oPercent Growth • • Workshop Agenda 5 Planning and Zoning Commission Plan of Work C7 • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning er Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 MEMORANDUM January 20, 2005 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Joseph A. Dunn, AICP, Director of Planning & Development Services Subject: Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work • Following the discussion at the January 6, 2005 Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop meeting, the draft Plan of Work has been updated to include the prioritization of the items within each planning category. The attach list reflects our understanding of the consensus from that meeting. Tonight we are seeking the Commission's direction on how this item should proceed. Staff recommends that the Plan of Work be prepared for presentation to the City Council in the next joint meeting held with the Planning and Zoning Commission. • ~ Planning & Zoning Commission Preliminary List for Draft 2004-2005 Plan of Work Council/ Staff initiated 1. Initiate Comprehensive Plan Update 2. Initiate Annexation Plan 3. Subdivision Regulations (P&Z member be involved with process) 4. UDO update quarterly 5. Hike and Bike Trails Plan Revision 6. Greenways Plan Revision 7. Parks and Recreation Plan Revision Exploratory/ Board Initiated • 1. Create and Approve "Rules of Procedure or Bylaws 2. Revise Citizen Survey for Planning guidance 3. Develop Tree Ordinance 4. Develop Fencing Standards 5. Drainage - "Zero Rise Rule" Learning /Information 1. Development 101 Workshop 2. Transportation Plan -College Station and County interface 3. HOA City interface -Update 4. Financing -Public Financing in advance of development S. Cluster Development 6. Fire Flow Overview Communication /Engagement • Meeting with City Council -Guidance and Review • Joint meeting with City of Bryan Planning & Zoning • • Joint meeting with Brazos County Planning Offices • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d' DtUtlopment StrvicGs AGENDA Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, Februaary 3, 2005, at 'fi:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Heat Ci ' ens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of ~e agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 2, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission • and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary and final plats, whew staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items crpproUed by Consent are apprnraed with any and all staff recbmmendationr There Hill not be separate discussion of these items. If ary Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the ConsentAgenda it ~a~ill be motrd to the RegularAgenda for, further rnnsideration. 2. lLQnBX~t~A~'en(~S• 2.1 Consideration, discussion for approval of meeting minutes for: • Thursday, January 20, 2005 -Workshop Meeting • Thursday, January 20, 2005 -Regular Meeting 3. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. John Nichols -February 3, 2005, Meeting Bill Davis -February 17, 2005, Meeting 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. • 5. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, consideration and possible action on a Final Plat for Horse Haven Estates Phase 2 consisting of 10 lots on 2.37 acres generally located at Earl Rudder Freeway and Horse Haven Lane. Case #04-270 QP) 6. Presentation, discussion, consideration and possible action on a Rezoning from A-O Agricµltural Open to R-1 Single Family of a portion of Renee Lane RO.W. and for lots 4 & • 5 of the Bald Prairie Subdivision, consisting of approximately 7.7 acres located at the north end of Renee Lane. Case #04-285 (JR). C, 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which nonce has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 8. Adjourn. onayketbn wkb Attornav lC~ov't G"~ e.-~ ion 551.071} I noseibla action The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must ba made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979-764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas posted on Internet Websita h1:to://www.cstx.aov and Cable Access Channel 19. • • Regular Consent Agenda 2.1 Consideration, discussion for approval of meeting minutes for: Thursday, January 20, 2005 Workshop Meeting Thursday, January 20, 2005 Regular Meeting ., ,~ MINUTES Workshop Meeting • Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, January 20, 2005, at 6:30 p.m. Administrative Conference Room College Station Clty Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d' Ikvelopment Servicer COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Shafer, Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Reynolds, Nichols, Hooton and White. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Happ. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Prochazka, Hitchcock, Boyer, Reeves, Norton, Planning & Development Services Director Dunn, Graduate Civil Engineer Cotter, Senior Assistant City Engineer Gibbs, Senior Planner Fletcher and Staff Assistants Grace and Lindgren. OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: First Assistant City Attorney Nemcik. 1. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. Commissioners mentioned that the staff review comments seemed long. Cotter explained that in order to keep some of the projects on their projected P&Z timeline most of the comments were construction document .related. Cotter explained that staff wanted those comments out there for them to realize that all the staff comments needs to be addressed before the plat will actually be filed. Commissioner White asked how the staff review comments are shared with the developers. Cotter explained that everyone involved, and those listed on the application receive a copy of the staff review comments. Commissioner White also asked for clarification on the procedure for the follow up in order to make sure that each item on the staff review comments are adhered to. Cotter explained that they resubmit and staff reviews everything to make sure all items have been taken care of. • There was discussion regarding an i 1X17 copy of the plat to be included in the packets. Commissioners agreed that including an 11X17 copy ofthe plat in their packets would be helpful, Chairman Shafer asked that Commissioners receive 11X17 copies on preliminary and final plats. P&Z Workshop Minutes January 20, 2005 Page 1 of 3 2. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff. • ~ Case #04-261; Edelweiss $usiness Center Lots 4-R & 5-R Block 2 Graduate Civil Engineer Cotter explained that basically they reconfigured a lot, shifted a lot line. Case #04-238; Duck haven Estates Phase 1 Amending Plat Lots 1-R thru 13- R & 18-R Graduate Civil Engineer Cotter explained that the number of lots was reduced. Case #04-266; McCulloch's Subdivision Lots 9-11 Block 4 Graduate Civil Engineer Cotter explained that the number of lots was reduced. Case #04-107; McCulloch's Subdivision Lots 12 & 13 Block 7 Graduate Civil Engineer Cotter explained that a lot line was moved. Castlegate Section 10 Amending Plat Graduate Civil Engineer Cotter explained that a lot line was moved to correct a home that was built into the set back. • 5. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Planning & Zoning Director Dunn asked that the Commissioners give comments on what topic(s) of training they would like to receive next in order for staff to be able to prepare. Commissioner White asked if it was ever decided or just mentioned that College Station P&Z Commissioners meet with Bryan P&Z Commissioners. Commissioners discussed that this was a good idea, but to date no action has been taken on this. Commissioner White asked Planning & Zoning Director Dunn if he could get such meeting scheduled. Planning & Zoning Director Dunn explained that in addition to a meeting with Bryan P&Z Commissioners, a joint meeting with Council needs to be scheduled. Commissioner Fedora mentioned that he sits on the Board for the Education Foundation for College Station ISD. On a report that they receive monthly, it states that College Station ISD grew 4.1%, which is a hard number. Anywhere from 375-500 kids. The gowth is expected to be even higher than that. P&Z Workshop Minutes January 20, 2005 Page 2 of 3 Planning & Zoning Director Dunn suggested that since this matter is not the agenda, that • we add an agenda item in order for someone from the school district to attend one of our future workshop meetings in order to give us an update on the growth. Commissioner Fedora suggested contacting Eddie Coalson or Mike Ball. Chairman Shafer asked if the Commission would be willing to initiate a new set of zones for the Greenway Land Use. Planning & Zoning Director Dunn asked for clarification as to whether this needed to be incorporated into the Plan of Work or as a topic for an agenda item to be discussed. Chairman Shafer stated he would like to consider this part of the Plan of Work. It was suggested to add it to number six on the Plan of Work. 6. Adjourn. Commissioner Nichols motioned to adjourn the meeting. His motion was seconded by Commissioner White, motion passes (7-0). FOR: Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Reynolds, Nichols, Hooton, White and Chairman Shafer. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: None. • Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Development Services • P&Z Workshop Minutes January 20, 2005 Page 3 of 3 MINUTES Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission • Thursday, January 20, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Alarming d' Dev~lopmrrt Srrvira • COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Shafer, Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Reynolds, Nichols, Hooton and White. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Happ. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Prochazka, Hitchcock, Boyer, Reeves, Norton, Planning & Development Services Director Dunn, Graduate Civil Engineer Cotter, Senior Assistant City Engineer Gibbs, Senior Planner Fletcher and Staff Assistants Grace and Lindgren. OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: 1. Hear Visitors First Assistant City Attorney Nemcik. David Krenek, 2718 Brockway in the Windwood Subdivision. 1VIr. Krenek stated that approximately two months ago Commissioners received a report from the Windwood Subdivision Homeowners Association regarding Switchstation Road being a one way road instead of a two way road plus making the road go completely through. In September 2004 there was a special meeting called by the Homeowners Association to vote on some items. Mr. Krenek stated that the report did not include a whole lot of the items that went on during that meeting. Mr. Krenek states that he remembers the members of the Homeowners Association voting FOR a two way street for Substation Road. Mr. Krenek asked that when the Commissioners hear from Windwood Homeowners Association to please listen to what they are saying, but try and understand that they have a very specific agenda that is not backed by too many more people than those of us that would like to see it as a two way street. They are offering an ultimatum that if they cannot have a one way street, then they want the street blocked off completely. Mr. Krenek states that this offer was not even in the vote. Mr. Krenek stated again that he is FOR Switchstation Road becoming a two way street. • P&Z Minutes January 20, 2005 Page i of 6 • 2. Consent Agenda 2.1 Consideration, discussion and possible action on meeting minutes: Thursday, December 16, 2004 -Workshop Meeting Minutes Thursday, December 16, 2004 -Regular Meeting Minutes Thursday, January 6, 2005 -Workshop Meeting Minutes Commissioner Davis made the motion to approve all other minutes as presented. Commissioner Fedora seconded the motion, motion passes (7-0). FOR: Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Reynolds, Nichols, Hooton, White and Chairman Shafer. AGAINST: None ABSENT: None. 2.2 Consideration and possible action on a Final Plat -Residential for Spring Creek Gardens Phase 1 consisting of 32 lots on 6.241 acres generally located between SH6 and Decatur Drive, north of Arrington Road. Case #04-271 (M~ • Commissioner Davis made the motion to approve the final plat for Spring Creek Gardens Phase 1. Commissioner Fedora seconded the motion, motion passes (7- 0). FOR: Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Reynolds, Nichols, Hooton, White and Chairman Shafer. AGAINST: None ABSENT: None. Regular Agenda 3. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. No absence requests were discussed. 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. No items were discussed. • 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the Shenandoah Subdivision, Phase 14 consisting of 31 lots on 7.213 acres generally located south of Southern Plantation Drive and west of Alexandria Avenue. Case #04-280 (MA1CC) P&Z Minutes January 20, 2005 Page 2 of 6 Graduate Civil Engineer Cotter presented this item for consideration of a final plat for • Phase 14 of the Shenandoah Subdivision. The final plat is in compliance with the land use plan which designates this area as single family residential medium density. Phase 14 will take access from Alexandria Avenue which is designated a minor collector on the City's thoroughfare plan. The subdivision is located in the Spring Creek sanitary sewer impact fee area. Impact fees are due at the time of the filing of the final plat. Parkland dedication was previously approved by the Parks Board and the preliminary plat shows Greenway area at the end of Harrisburg Lane to be dedicated to the City in the future. The final plat is in compliance with the approved preliminary plat and all lots meet minimum requirements. Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the condition that staff review comments number one be addressed, and they are attached. Commissioner Nichols asked about staff review comment number seven, this comment refers to a type four curbing. Commissioner Nichols asked for a one sentence explanation of what type four curbing is and why it is not allowed. Graduate Civil Engineer Cotter stated that type four curbing is a two piece curbing where the pavement is laid and the curb is on top of the pavement. The City of College Station requires a monolithic curbing where the curb is one piece. Chairman Shafer asked if the floodplain had been taken care. Graduate Civil Engineer Cotter stated that they are working on changing the grading of that street so that all the supporting grading for that street would be within the right of way outside the floodplain of the creek. Commissioner White moved for approval for a final plat for Shenandoah Subdivision • Phase 14. Commissioner Nichols seconded the motion, motion passes (7-0). FOR: Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Reynolds, Nichols, Hooton, White and Chairman Shafer. AGAINST: None ABSENT: None 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Dove Crossing Phase One, consisting of 121 lots of 25.694 acres generally located along the south side of Graham Road, across from the intersection of Graham Road and Shaffer Road. Case #04-284 (JP) Staff Planner Prochazka presented this item for consideration for a final plat for the first phase of Dove Crossing. This phase has 121 lots on 25.694 acres which includes a portion Alexandria Avenue which is a minor collector on the City's thoroughfare plan. A pedestrian access way to the school property to the west is also proposed with this phase. There were four variances granted to the required block length for this plat. Three of those blocks are included in the first phase; they are blocks one, two and four. The portion of this phase closest to Graham is in the 9201 sewer impact fee and the applicant has also requested oversize participation for the twelve inch water line. The final plat is in compliance with comprehensive plan and the preliminary plat that was approved towards the end of 2004 and with the variances granted with that preliminary plat it is • also in compliance with the subdivision regulations. The Parks Board did accept a fee in lieu of land dedication for this particular project at the time of the preliminary plat. Staff is recommending approval of the final plat with the staff review comments that are P&Z Minutes January 20, 2005 Page 3 of 6 attached. The majority of those comments have already been met with the new submittal. All changes aze reflected with the plat on the wall, the construction documents are still • under review. Commissioner Davis asked Staff Planner Prochazka for a clarification on the subdivision regulations regazding the walkway going through to the school, aze sidewalks aze present. Staff Planner Prochazka stated that it would beaten foot wide access way with a four foot sidewalk through the middle of it and the lots adjacent do have a side street set back off of it at fifteen feet instead of the seven and a half feet of a regular side lot line. Commissioner Davis made motion to move for approval on a Final Plat for Dove Crossing Phase One. Commissioner Reynolds seconded the motion, motion passes (7-0). FOR: Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Reynolds, Nichols, Hooton, White and Chairman Shafer. AGAINST: None ABSENT: None 7. Presentation, discussion, and possible action concerning Planning and Zoning Commission Rules and Procedures. (TF) Senior Planner Fletcher gave presentation on Planning and Zoning Commission Rules and Procedures. In assembling the Rules and Procedures, a number of examples from azound the state were solicited and reviewed, mainly of cities of similaz population, along • with some internal examples from some boazds and commissions that serve our department as well as the City Council. Unless there are questions or comments it is up for the approval of the Commissioners this evening. Commissioner Nichols stated that he appreciates staffs work on pulling all of this together, that is has been discussed in workshop a couple of times and that what is being presented well represents what we had in mind a month or two ago. Chairman Shafer also expressed his appreciation on the work that all staff did in completing this project. Commissioner Davis stated that he feels that the long range benefit that we will have from this for other Commissioners down the road is significant and that the Commissioners appreciate what staff has done. Commissioner Nichols made the motion to approve the Planning and Zoning Commission Rules and Procedures with the editing changes. Commissioner Fedora seconded the motion, motion passes (7-0). FOR: AGAINST: ABSENT: 8. Discussion • P&Z Minutes Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Reynolds, Nichols, Hooton, White and Chairman Shafer. None None of Planning and Zoning Plan of Work (JD) January 20, 2005 Page 4 of 6 Planning and Development Services Director Dunn stated that since the Rules of • Procedure have been adopted, Article 2.2A Plan of Work, in accordance of that the Commission may adopt a Plan of Work. Planning and Tevelopment Services Director Dunn stated that he would like to mention that the Commissioners were given this list as what staff understands of your consensus at the January 6, 2005, workshop was. Planning and Development Services Director Dunn presented the couple of items that were modifications to the Plan of Work that were discussed at the workshop totight. Planning and Development Services Director Dunn stated that what we are asking for tonight is not an adoption of this plan, but for a motion or a consensus from Commissioners that this is the list you wish to present to City Council. Commissioners Nichols asked how this fits with staff's plan of work. Planning and Development Services Director replied that stars plan of work is driven by the Strategic Plan adopted by Council. Commissioner Nichols stated that the main thing he wanted to make sure of was that when the Planning and Zoning Commissioners talk to Council that we know how this fits into their Strategic Plan. Commissioner Davis made the motion to forward this list to City Council as the Plan of Work for the Planning and Zoning Commission. Commissioner Fedora seconded the motion, motion passes (7-0). • FOR: Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Reynolds, Nichols, Hooton, White and Chairman Shafer. AGAINST: None ABSENT: None 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. No items were discussed. 10. Adjourn. Commissioner Davis made the motion to adjourn. Commissioner Nichols seconded the motion, motion passes (7-0). FOR: AGAINST: ABSENT: • P&Z Minutes Commissioners Fedora, Davis, Reynolds, Nichols, Hooton, White and C Chairman Shafer. None. None. ]anuary 20, 2005 Page 5 of 6 Approved: C7 Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Development Services • C7 P&Z Minutes January 20, 2005 Page 6 of 6 C7 Regular agenda 3 Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. John Nichols -February 3, 2005, Meeting Bill Davis -February 17, 2005, Meeting Lisa l.md~ren -Request for Pardon Februa 3, .2005::.:. .:.:.:.:. -..:::::...... ::.:. ..:.:..:: ..:.:.:.: ....:.::. _ :.:.::::. ., :..::.. .::.:.., , Page:1 • From: "John Nichols" <jpn(~ag.tamu.edu> To: <Llindgren~cstx.gov> Date: 1127/20051:43:35 PM Subject: Request for Pardon -February 3, 2005 Dear Lisa, Please consider this my request for pardon from attending the Februrary 3, 2005 P8Z meeting. 1 will traveling out of town on business that day. Thank you for submitting this to the Commission. best regards, John N. John P. Nichols Professor and Associate Head Department of Agricultural Economics Director, Center for Consumer and food Marketing Issues Institute of Food Science 8 Engineering Texas A&M University College Station TX 77843-2124 Phone: 979-845-8491 Fax: 979-862-3019 E-mail: jpnt~tamu.edu • Website: http://agecon.tamu.edu • ............. isa in ren Fwd :.Meetm :Feb 17th ...:.. :.. Pa e 1 • From: Deborah Grace To: Lisa Lindgren Date: 1 /21 /2005 8:22:21 AM Subject: Fwd: PSZ Meeting Feb 17th Absence Request for Bill Davis. »> "Bill (George W.R.) Davis" <biit(~pianoplace.net> 1121!2005 8:20:08 AM »> I will be in Florida working on my Fathers Estate for the February 17th P82 Meeting. Please excuse my absence. Bitl Davis Planning and Zoning Commissioner 1008 Holt St College Station TX 77840 • • • Regular Agenda 5 Final Plat for Horse Haven Estates Phase 2 consisting of 10 lots on 2.37 acres generally located at Earl Rudder Freeway and Horse Haven Lane. Case #04-270 (jP) • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner Date: January 24, 2004 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Horse Haven Estates Phase 2, consisting of 10 lots on 2.37 acres generally located at Earl Rudder Freeway and Horse Haven Lane. Applicant: Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group, agent for owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Final Plat in preparation for residential development. The applicant is proposing 10 R-1 Single Family Residential lots. The Final Plat is in compliance with the approved Preliminary Plat and the Subdivision Regulations. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates this • property as Single-Family Residential Medium Density. Appomattox is shown as a minor collector on the Thoroughfare Plan. The applicant has provided sufficient right-of--way for the extension of Appomattox to the northern property. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the Final Plat. The options regarding the Final Plat are: ^ Approval • Denial Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial 3. Application 4. Copy of Final Plat • FOR OFFICE SE ONL \ ,~ n ~\~W`~ 1D''~ ~/l P&ZCASENO.: ~~ `~ ~~ b -Igo DATE SUBMITTED: ~ I FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending Final ^ Vacating ^ Replat ($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)* *Includes public hearing fee i ne ronowmg items must pe supmltted by an established filing deadline date for P8Z Commisslon constderatten_ MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet ~~/ariance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) __ //~evelopment Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) -~ Application completed in full. J ~ Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). / Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) " ' One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. / A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). Parkland Dedication requir ent approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). ~ir~vtprJSf~w ~tre~% ~I.D ,. ~/ t~~.. l _ >~ ...~ ate of Preapplication,Ctonference: NAME OF SUBDIVISION f 1"O QS~ E"~'/A'y~` y 1E ST7~~ ~j U1a.S C T~ D SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) ~ . S lD~ ~~ {-{p ~~/-{1WLca/ ~~i4~1! ~ APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name ~~ ~~f9R~G ~'~i6~T Street Address o~.~ ~' ~~'t04~ /qt~G, ~j City C State Zi Code Z~~~~ E-Mail AddressA~9~ Phone Number --5 Fax Number ~~- '~~_ PROPERTY OW~1NE//R~~S INFOR~MrATION: Name ~ ~.'t"1syl. ~+- ~ ~Z/A Street Address "C~[6 C.~ D S~ /I State ,~ Zip Code ~?~ Phone Number _~~YQ ~ ~ ~~ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name ~~(, • Street Address stG State Zip Code Phone Number City COC~,,,/S~' ~ ~j~¢~Zq~l,~ E-Mail Address Fax Number G City E-Mail Address Fax Number 6/13/03 1 of 5 Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume U~~" and Page # Acreage ~ Total Property ` i~. ~ QG~G S Total # Of Lots D R-O-W Acreage 6. Z? ~L xisting Use: ~Y~ Gtr ~'f'r~6t,( Proposed Use: S ~GQ, umber Of Lots By Zoning District ~~ /~~' / / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: d. ~ / Q'-~ ~ / / / Floodptain Acreage ND /Vls. A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): ~ ~ /!' Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: ~O ~ ~ Requested Oversize Participation: ~ d ~tJ 6' r~n,Esr [ ~ a Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: ~~ Streets '~ Sidewalks ~~Z~ Sanitary Sewer Lines ~$ 3 Water Lines ~~"' Channels ~A' Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways 4R FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: ~_ # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $~T d• (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. d The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. ~~ +c-"-_ Sign a and tle Date • / 6/13/03 2of5 ti U 0 l~ ~e H O Q ~`n - - ~=` ~~~- = - ~OA~ h r~ g ~' - ~ 1~~~y y~ o h 1M0 h d' b~ ..... A H h ~ '1'~~ $ ti ~f:~ C:'2 dJ ' ^9 h ~ h N ~~ J "'1 ~" OQ' ~o ~ ~ 1 ~ ' g ~ o h J " '^ i m aS 1~~+ hr~ O O P ti ~ rJ 0 h .., ~~RSf~ aS f. 00 `~' h ~ .~ ^~i ~ aq, .°~~~ firer ,,, My~' w ~ ~, ^°' b~~'E,~. ., ~ i a J ~ ~. ~ o Jti~l ~5 F~~~~P ~J~~~~ z of `~~(ib N U <...t W 6~~ SSPtf. ~ h$ Q ':) ,...ti .: 0 Q f~~~ ):. O; ~? 'i' 26 °:-i 4 ^r.~ ``.S CJ R~ 0. ::: i ~ ~ ~ h ~~ ~ :: ~~ ~ .~ ~ op ~' ~70 ~ ,.~ ~ d'O F ~ W a `~' s ~ H h -1J ~~~J C'dr' 4• b y 1 1~ R~ ~jt-'~ h H O~ ?F h ~,6 ~ h 1 ` ry ?'i~ rtll Q' ~ 7 i ~ ~' ~ N ~ ~ " ~ a roe ~ i~ ~ O ~, 5i ~, - . -, N ~ ~ry H ~ ~ ~ e R q .t° c ~ ~ ~~~~~~ m ' ~~°~ ~ 'tea °' ~ S` ~ x ~ ~~,~~ 4 b S~~ ~ h ~~ z S~Ptf, ~~ O x :~ ~ ~ b.1 ~~j ', ~ w' ~Hy .~ h 3~ cJ aS ~ ~_{ ~ ffi a ~ ; ~.. • Regular Agenda 6 Rezoning from A-0 Agricul~ral Open to R-1 Single Family of a portion of Renee Lane R.O.W. and for lots 4 & 5 of the Bald Prairie Subdivision, consisting of approxirriately 7.7 acres located at the north end of Renee Lane. Case #04-285 (JR) • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves Date: 1-27-05 Email: jreeves@cstx.gov Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning from A-O Agricultural Open to R-1 Single Family of a portion of Renee Lane R.O.W. and for lots 4 & 5 of the Bald Prairie Subdivision, consisting of approximately 7.7 acres located at the north end of Renee Lane. Applicant: Edelweiss Gartens Venture, J. Steven Arden, Manager Partner and The City of College Station. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of both zoning requests as submitted. Item Summary: The applicant's intent is to continue the growth of Edelweiss Gartens in College Station and to convert the A-O Agricultural Open rural tracts into R-1 Single Family lots. The rezoning of the Renee Lane Right-of-Way is not an approval of the right of way abandonment. • Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan shows this area as Single Family Residential Medium Density. The property will have access via Renee Lane, which is classified as a residential street on the thoroughfare plan. The zone request from A-O to R-1 is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan; therefore, staff is recommending approval of the zone change. Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the City of College Station City Limits June of 1995 and was platted June 1973. The intent is to include lots 4 and 5 in the preliminary plat for Edelweiss Subdivision Phases 6-12 that will be coming before the Commission for approval in the near future. Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted; 2. Recommend a less intense zoning classification; 3. Recommend denial; 4. Table indefinitely; or, 5. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial • 3. Application 4. Infrastructure and Facilities P: IGROUPWTLTRIPZLTRIPROD1PZ20041P0010589. DOC Created on 12/30/2004 2:35 PM • INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: There is an 8 inch water line currently being constructed with Mountain Breeze Way, as part of the final plat for Edelweiss Gartens Phase 6. This 8 inch line is fed by an existing 12 inch waterline on Victoria. Sewer: Similarly, an 8 inch sewer line is currently being constructed with Mountain Breeze Way, as part of Edelweiss Gartens Phase 6. Streets: Renee Lane is classified as a residential street. Off-site Easements: N/A Drainage: Drainage is to an unnamed tributary to the northwest that flows to Edelweiss Gartens Park. Flood. Plain: No FEMA floodplain onsite. Oversize request: None requested at this time. Impact Fees: This subject property is not in an impact fee area. NOTIFICATION: • Legal Notice Publication(s):. The Eagle; 01-18-05 and 02-08-05 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 02-03-05 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 02-24-05 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 10 Response Received: None as of date of staff report • P:IGROUPWTLTRIPZLTRIPROD1PZ20041P0010589. DOC Created on 12/300/22004 2:35 PM FOR OFFICE USfrt~ CASE NO. ~ ~~ II JJ DATE SUBMITTED ~~ ~aNING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning 8~ Zoning Commission or City Council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: X Application completed in full. _ X $500.00 application fee X Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. X Written legal description of subject property (metes 8~ bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). X The Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. A CAD (dxf/dwg) or GIS (shp) digital file may be required for more complex rezoning requests. Date of Required Preapplication Conference: APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: • Name EDELWEISS GARTENS VENTURE J. STEVEN ARDEN MANAGING PARTNER Street Address 311 Cecilia Loop City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845 E-Mail Address: Phone Number 97~ 9) 846.5735 Fax Number (979) 846-0652 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name 8 address Lick Creek Farm & Ranch, Inc. , 13886 Renee Lane. College Station TX 77845 Name & address L C F 8~ R Trust. 13886 Renee Lane. College Station. TX 77845 This property was conveyed to owner by deed recorded in Volume 3942, Page 155 (Lot 4), and Volume 4657. Page 20 (Lot 5Zof the Brazos County Official Records. General Location of Property: along Renee Lane Address of Property: 13864 and 13886 Renee Lane Legal Description: Lots 4 8~ 5, BALD PRAIRIE SUBDIVISION 8~ PART OF Renee Lane R.O.W Acreage -Total Property: 7.700 Acres Existing Zoning: A-0 Zone Proposed Zoning R-1 Zone Present Use of Property Large acreage rural tract Proposed Use of Property: R-1 Single Family Residential lots C7 REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. ~e City of College Station continues to prow to the south and demand for R-1 residential lots also increases In this area. The construction of the new middle school and the proposed construction of the new high school and a new elementary in this vicinity adds to the demand. 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. The zone change is in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change. The upcoming Barron Road widening and improvements along with the schools in the vicinty are only going to make this area of town even more desirable to the single family residential market buyers. It is advantageous to the City's interests to upgrade the development of this property . ~he applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and cert~es that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION lS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. na ure ner (or agent) or app t Date • ~~~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ~rrr.,~~ Planning d Development Services • ~ MEMORANDUM January 27, 2005 TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Joey Dunn, Director of Planning & Development Services SUBJECT: BALD PRAIRIE SUBDIVISION (REZ) -REZONING As the Zoning Administrator for the City of College Station, I am initiating a rezoning request for a portion of Renee Lane Right-of-Way from A-O Agricultural • Open to R-1 Single Family. This request is in conjunction with the rezoning request for Lots 4 & 5 of Bald Prairie Subdivision. This area is planned for single family residential development and is proposed to be included in the Edelweiss Gartens Subdivision phases 6-12 that will be coming before the Commission for approval in the near future. This portion of the Renee Lane Right-of--Way is required to be abandoned prior to moving forward with the platting of Edelweiss Phase 6-12. The rezoning of the Renee Lane Right-of-Way is not an approval of the right of way abandonment. • P.O. BOX 9960.1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS •77842 979.764.3570 WWW.CS~C.90V ~4., ='~ ~ p~ a '- o r b h ~~ h H b b r SS1 ii .. ,oo g: ~` h`a `` ~~\~ OS ~ h ~~~ ~~ .,~ b w~1 ~ ~ ` h ~ df h r ~ ` ~ F111 _ ~ P ~° _ f_ J h ~' ~l - c P _ .a _ O - ,'' oe- ors ~~ __ _ e~ h b ~~ ~ p n G~ S h G '" h ,~ ho `^ Q b Jb ~ ~ "'7 ~%~ ~ r O y h ,o h ! ~. b ~~~ (_~. _ h h ~ ~ q _. ~ ~ y __ h r~ ~ ~ y o S~ ~ 0 n h 15 N ~ h O l=J ~ n ~pP ` `~ n ~ ^ ~ bh O b ~y h h ~ ` -~ ~ ~ ~ ` C , N ~F - '- __ ? h '~ r~~ ` , ~~ _~ ~! ~ N r9 -- ~o d, o '~ '~ q oO~ QQ' ~A ~ Q T^ \ ~ O h ' ,~ 1' ~ o~ ~O ` ~ ` \2 \ o~ h ~~ e ~ h ~ ~~ h \ ~~ a O~J °Ca h ~ Nh ~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~aY ~~> o $ ry ~ i;ILi ~ , ~ ` o n c!' b O y1~6'~+ °!a h '~' m i y 7id,O ! ^ ?C ~Sv1'/ b ~ ~`J/ ___ h 'q dby ` ~':J`J --"-~ "~ h J 2 ~~ b ~ ~G~ lzi 0 tibia ~Oy.P 2~ ~ -- ,~ l~~ ~ ~~ i ~ Od ~ ~ `-' h b h W^ h ~ n ~ S ?~~ ~` L P ~ l . d , + yld, ~ - __: R ~I A JI ~ "' ~ ^ moo, h . b .- Q ~ 2' v 7` ry, ~ _ Q h h _ ~ v i w ` " T O / s ~ h ~ ~~ q ~ Y ' p ~ ~ ~ ~P m ~ r - ~ i ~ _. ^ , ~R'aF F ~d] .mfg _ a. o "~~ 0J ~.,- -- _ - :~1.4. m ~ °_ ~ .°~. ~ ~ h YMI W N U a~ 11 ~-+ III II ~ I'I O {1~,N I 'D O zI