Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/05/2006 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionJ ... CL"C'Y OF CC7LLECE S'1`ATIt7N /'laxxi»~ ~lkar/opsuar Scrvicrrr AGENDA Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, January 5, 2006, at 6:00 p.m. Administrative Conference Room City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Call the meeting to order. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Presentation, possible action and discussion on an item to update the Commission on the status of items within the P&Z Plan of Work. 4. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. • - February 9, 2006 ~ Joint Workshop with City Council 5. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 6. Adjourn Notice is hereby given that a Workshop Meeting of the College Station Planning and Zoning Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on the 5th day of January, 2006, at 6:00 p.m. at the City Hall Administrative Conference Room, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the 30th day of December 2005 at 5:00 PM. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS F-Signed by Co nie HQbks VERIFY authenticity prov~i By Connie Hooks, City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website, www.cstx.aov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on December 30, 2005, at 5 pm. and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: by Dated this day of , 2005. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS • BY. Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of 2005. Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas My commission expires• This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) i-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.gov. Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. t • r CITY OF Coz.I.tcE STA'ITIJN P~innirg dr Gbrxlo~nent Servrc~r AGENDA Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, January' 5, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas Call meeting to order. 2. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) • All matters listed under Item 2, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with arty and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 3. Consent Agenda. 3.1 Possible action and discussion on: Minutes -Subdivision Regulations Workshop Meeting -November 3, 2005 Minutes -Workshop Meeting -November 3, 2005 Minutes -Workshop Meeting -November 17, 2005 Minutes -Regular Meeting -November 17, 2005 3.2 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Development Plat for the Olden Homeplace consisting of one lot on 28.61 acres generally located on Rock Prairie Road East, across from the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency landfill. Case #05-500223 (NIH) • ., , • Regular Agenda. 4. Possible action and discussion on request(s) for absence from meetings. Presentation, possible action and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on a Replat of Lot 1 Block 1 of the T.J. Addition & Lot 1 Block 1 of C.S.L. of Texas Inc. Subdivisions on 2.001 acres generally located at the corner of Sebesta Rd. and State Highway 6. Case #OS-500195 (CIS 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Variance Request to the Subdivision Regulations Sections; 8.J.2 Block Length, and on a Preliminary Plat for the Castlerock Subdivision consisting of 295 lots on 76.65 acres, generally located north of Castlegate Subdivision along the east side of State Highway 40. Case #OS-500218 (JR/CC) Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat -Replat for the University Park Ph 2 consisting of one (1) lot on 4.7 acres generally located at 1000 Spring Loop. Case #OS-500028 (TF) 9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on a Rezoning for the Augustus Babille Tract A from A-O Agricultural-Open to C-1 General Commercial consisting of 2 lots on 22.752 acres generally located at the intersection of Greens Prairie • Road and Arrington Road. Case #05-500172 (TF) 10. Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on a Rezoning for the Augustus Babille Tract B from A-O Agricultural-Open to C-1 General Commercial consisting of 39.671 acres generally located between Greens Prairie Road and Arrington Road. Case #OS-500188 (TF) 11. Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on the annual review of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The annual review consists of a proposed amended UDO to replace the existing ordinance including changes to the Northgate Zoning Districts. Case #OS-500023 (VIII) 12. Adjourn. Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the College Station Planning and Zoning Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on the 5th day of January, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the 30th day of December, 2005 at 5:00 PM. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS t-5lgned by Coq"iife ~-- VE IFY authenCicity ~i ~ f prov sy Connie Hooks, City Secretary • I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Ha11,1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website, www.csta.eov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on December 30th, 2005, at 5 PM and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: ~_sl ~~,.~ by Subscribed and sworn to before me on This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.eov. Planning and Zoning Commission • meetings are broadcast Gve on Cable Access Channel 19. • Dated this ~ day of 2005. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS r~ C7 o~ ~ ~ ''' o ~ ~ ~y p C ~ „per ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ bA ~ pO N N U t.. ~ a+ eo A ~ ~ ~ P. ~ `ti : ~ .. ~ ' ~ a ~ '~ w w O A ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ '~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ $ az [[yy ~t a .~ ti' O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~~ ... a ~, ~ g~ +~ U .o,~ '~ ~ a a :~ ~., N ~ ~'~ ~ ~ . °~' w ~~~'A ~'~ ~`~ ~ h ~ ° • O ~i ~ y ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a. d v d' yea ~ ~ "`~ ~ -.~ p . ~ p~ y c V o o p O ' •~3 ~ 0~0 0 O ~ ~ h o O ~' ~ ~ FR `~ ~ O O ~ U a ~ ~ ~' ;~ O ~ '~ ~ 00 ~ '~ , ~ , y ~ O ~" ~ ~ ~ , .~ ~ F ~ b ~ `/~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ v~ ~ ~~ ~ o a Vic, ~4 a a v~ , ~ ~ '~ +.. +.. Z'1 ~~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ Q Q ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ p " ~ U U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~~ ,~ ~a b ~ o ~~ ~ ~v .~ ~ ~'~ '~o ~ `~ ~ '~ •° ~'~ '~ ^ J s ~ N a ~~~ ~~°° ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ y~ v ~~ O•o ~ C~ y v~ ~ v .~ .~ p~j O fi ~ ~ ~ b O ^ A y ~ U ~ ~ 'a a. ~~ ~ ,O U'~ ~,, ~ ,o~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~.O ~ a o~ ~a' o ~ '~ ~ abi ~ ~ a .o A ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3~ ~ '•.'~ ~ c~a ~~ a a "'' ~ (V M ~ ~D ~ [~ O a ~J • ++ .r o. a O U ~, U ~ ++ o •o O o . V a ~, ~ .a y ~ aG ''" C N ~ 0., D4 ~ " ~ a, N o a o s~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g~ ~ 3~ c ~~ ~ ~s ~ ~, a ~~ow`. ~ d' ~ ~i ~. '" ~ " ~ e ,~ '~ v ~ ~ p y +; ~ ~~ ~ a ~ ~ ~_ on q ~~~ ooh ~iU.~~ v~ ~ N • Z -~ a . ~ a ~U ~s '~ •~ o~ ~' '~ w '~ r L ~~ ° b ~ ~~ a ~ 5 ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ , w ~ , ~ 3`~ ~ ~~ ~ ~o q ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , b s O v ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ y p O ~ ~~.d c~ ~~.b '~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ a+ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~~b~ p' on ~~~~ ao a ~a~~ a ~ ao ~~:~~ as a c U ~ w ~ a~ ~ ~ a~ ~ „~ v a.c ~ ~ a~ .,~ U ~ y ~ ° a~i y ~ • ° ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~~ '~'~ a {..~ a~+ ~ Oq ~3 +~ ~ Oq ' ~ a~ ~ OA ~3 ~~ +~ ~ OVA ~3 ~ O :+' ~~o~ a g ~ a ° ~ ~ ~ a'~ ~ N a ~ ~ ~b°~ ~ ~~ -~~oa y U•5'~ c U•~'o~? U•~y'o~o U.~.~a 0 ~ 'b U b U S~b .U.B~ °~' b ~ y + ~ U ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ ti ~ ~«+ o N V /~ ~ A H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r V N .~ U ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ U p p CS ~ ~ 1 Q ' p~., • U ~ F i o W o ~ I ~ ~ ° ~, ~ ~ , ~, ~ ~ d ~ I •~ .~ .~ a .~ A, ° y ~ ~ .. ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 'o ~ P ~,a° ~ Q rs; a ~ [~ U U k,, Gs, q N M d' V1 N ~ 0 N a • • • ~ ~ o° °O °O o °o °o g $ _ ~ ~ a '~+ O ~ ono ~ H a ~ ~ N N ~ \ ~t,i , -~ . -~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ A O N ~ `~ .o ° ,~ o g N ~ ~ ,-„ ~ q O y ~ ~ .~ c Z p o~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ a ~ , ~ ~c o ~ O ~; ~~+ O `~ ,sl .+a O '~ > O + ~ ~. ° O c i ~ ~ t~ N z A U ~ 3~ ~z o,~ ~ a a ~ ao y~~,~ O y y ~ ~ V ~ ~'~ as ~ p,a ~'~g~~ w as U •~ ~ Fo ~ •r3 ° ~ ~ ~ b as ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ p ~ `~ v ~ , a b y b w •1 c; a a a , •O ~ ~ ~ ~4~ U U U U ~ U ~ •~ ~ o a ~ ~ O V ~ o ~ q~ p ~ o W w ~ ~ o ~ a ~~ ~ ° o o w . ~ ~ ~ 0 .~ a : o ~ ~ a, O N ~ U ~~~;. v -~ ~ ~ o~~~ ' a ~. ~ ~ z ~ ~ ,~ b ~ .~ o ~ b ~ b .. /~~ 3 N ~ ~ ~„ c~ a A ~ ^y ~ ~ ,~ Ow '~ ~ o °' c~ ~ F ~ ~' v via ate. °g4 ~~ 1~ ~ . ~ ~ w -, v U ~ y U ~ ~ ' ~ U F'' ~ o w ~ ~ .~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ o ~, ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ p" U ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~ ~ ~, w . = 3wa ~x ~a, U~r~ A3 xx H ~Ux ° o~r~r~~ ° z w _ _ _ 0 co a • • C7 ~ ~ o .~ 0 .ca . °i ~ a z z .^ V ~o ~ .~ ,~ a~ ~ A ~ `~' O N ~ .~ U O O N ~ A A ~ ~ y ~ b ~~ ° b ~~ ~ c ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ,o a ~ ~ . ~~~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a`~ ~ a ~ ~ ~y ~ V [~ ~ U FtiE W~U~~a •~ b .:~ .~ ~ a O N o '~ ~ U ~" ~ °~ ~ . ~ a ' o a o ~a N a w ~ ~ ° .~ "" a., . a ~ ~ ~ o .~ ~ a ~ ~ ° U ~ y ~ ~ a+ O ~~ ~ «A ~ ° ~ .O 3 '~ ~ ~ ] V ~+ vj ° o 0 MINUTES Subdivision Regulations • Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, November 3, 2005, at 4:00 p.m. College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d Dcvclopmcnr Scrviar COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Acting Chairman Bill Davis, Corrunissxoners Hazold Strong, Mazsha Sanford, Dennis Christiansen, John Nichols and Ken Reynolds COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Scott Shafer. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: None. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Ptanners Lindsay Boyer, Jennifer Reeves, Crissy Hartl, Senior Planner Trey Fletcher, Director Joey Dunn, Senior Assistant City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Graduate Civil engineer Josh Norton, Transportation • Planner Ken Fogle, Development Coordinator Bridgette George, Assistant Director Lance Simms, and Staff Assistant Lisa Lindgren. OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: Assistant City Attorney Cazla Robinson and Roxanne Nemcik, Director of Public'Wnrks Mark Smith. VISITORS: Veronica Morgan, Ste~~en Arden and Chuck Ellison. 1. Call to Order. Acting Chairman Bill Davis called the meeting to order at 4:07 p.m. 2. Presentation, discussion and possible action on proposed amendments to Chapter 9, Subdivision regulations, Access Requirements and Perimeter Streets. Director of Public Works Mark Smith and Transportation Planner Ken Fogle gave a presentation regazding Access Requirements and Points of Access. Mr. Smith stated that two parts of the Access Requirements section aze the Streets and Thoroughfazes section and the Connectivity Index. Mr. Smith stated that the Connectivity Index is the ratio of the number of links divided by the number of nodes. A link is a street section basically between intersections and a cul-de-sac. Sections with adjacent homes that front on pazkland count double and street stubs that can be continued in the adjacent development are also links. Nodes aze intersections and cul-de-sac heads and dead ends. P&Z Workshop Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 1 of 2 Mr. Davis asked that Ken Fogle prepare some type of report or presentation on the connectivity issues. • Mark Smith continued with a presentation to the Commissioners re ardin Perimeter Streets. g g Commissioner Nichols asked that Mark Smith put together some sort of report that shows an overview regarding the current Subdivision Regulations and the proposed changes and the pros and cons of each. 3. Adjourn Commissioner Nichols motioned to adjourn. Comwssioher Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission U Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and De~~elopment Serviee~~ • P&Z Workshop' Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 2 of 2 • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d Deudopment Scrvicu MINUTES Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, November 3, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Scott Shafer, Commissioners Bill Davis, Marsha Sanford, Dennis Christiansen, Harold Strong, John Nichols and Ken Reynolds. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Boyer, Molly Hitchcock, Crissy Hard, Senior Pla~ Assistant City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Graduate Civil E Ken Fogle, Assistant Director Lance Simms, and Staff OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: Centex Representative Brian Cook. • 1. Call meeting to order. Berry. !tl/SE f Planners Lindsay tcher, Direct oey Dunn, Senior Norton, ransportation Planner Lisa Lindgren. City Att~~Roxanne Nemcik and Action Chairman Scott Sh~lled t~ meeting to~der at 6:03 p.m. 2. Discussion ~~nt ~e ar nda items. would save his questions for Case #05-160 for the 3. Presentation~ussii ,and possible action of the P&Z Plan of Work. Joey Dunn stated~iat currently there were a couple of sub-committee meetings in the works. The sub-committee of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 6:30 p.m. on November 10, 2005, in the Administrative Conference Room. Mr. Dunn also mentioned that he had asked Lisa to set up a meeting for the comprehensive plan/growth management sub-committee. He stated that in January 2006 the Planning and Zoning Commission will be having a joint meeting with the City Council regarding the plan of work. 4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding updates for the Northgate Ordinance and UDO Amendments. (MH) Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner, stated to the Commissioners that they would be receiving a handout showing all the proposed changes for the Northgate Ordinance and UDO P&Z Minutes Workshop Agenda November 3, 2005 Page 1 of 2 • • 5. 6. 7. 8. Amendments. She reminded the Commissioners that the joint workshop with City Council regarding the UDO is on November 22, 2005. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. Mr. Dunn mentioned the following meetings: • November 10, 2005 sub-committee meeting between the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. • November 22, 2005 -City Council Workshop with the Planning and Zoning Commission. ~ December 8, 2005, is the only meeting for the December and it is on the second Thursday, not ~ Presentation and discussion regarding the Bee Creek 4 and 5 Drainage Improvement Alan Gibbs, Senior Assistant City Engineer, gave 4 and 5 and the Drainage Improven~~Projects. Discussion and possible action Member may inquire about a statement of specific inf given. Any delibe on t agenda for a sub t me 'n~ Combined and on the update of Bee Creek da items - A Planning and Zoning •r notice has not been given. A .r th recitation of existing policy may be to a proposal to place the subject on an to adjourn. Commissioner Christiansen seconded Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant • Planning and Development Services Zoning Commission in Thursday. P&Z Minutes Workshop Agenda November 3, 2005 Page 2 of 2 • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d Dev~lopmrnt Seruias to order at 6:30 p.m. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Acting Chairmani3i~v~Marsha ord, Dennis Christiansen and Ken Reynolds. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Scott Shafe d Stron nd John CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Nan _ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT CES STAFF ENT: Staff Planners Molly Hitchcock, Lindsay Boyer, Crissy Hard, an Reeves, Se er Trey Fletcher, Senior Assistant City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Gradua Ci eer josh on, Transportation Planner Ken Fogle, Director Joey Dunn, Assistant Dir or L Staff Assistant Lisa Lindgren • OTHER CITY STAF As tant Ci A orne Carla Robinson. tY Y 1. Call the me2~ Actin 2. scussion of C 'ssione~ 191, ked TXDO the access access and th MINUTES Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, November 17, 2005, at 6:30 p.m. Administrative Conference Room College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas and items. :Chris en asl~d for clarification regarding the access points for Case #05- if had agreed to this. Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, stated that aware o e access points and they had agreed to them. He also stated that s inc ed one with full access and one with right-turn in and right-turn out ere based on TXDOT's long range plans. Commissioner'Christiansen asked why staff was recommending denial of the request for Case #05-186. Trey Fletcher stated that there were several reasons why denial was recommended including proximity to the airport and noise issues, proximity to Texas A&M, the fact that it was not on a transit or bike and pedestrian route, not being adjacent to a major intersection for zoning purposes and the comprehensive plan for economic development. • Commissioner Christiansen asked if staff was comfortable with the way the intersection would be and how close it was on Case #05-177. Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner, stated that staff was not comfortable with the way it is now. He stated that the Thoroughfare Plan P&Z Workshop Minutes November 17, 2005 Page 1 of 2 shows that Arrington Road will be realigned and that when that happens the access point will be taken away and Arrington Road will connect in a different system that will relocate • traffic to the intersection. 3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of the P&Z Plan of Work. • 4. 5. 6. Joey Dunn, Director, presented the plan of work. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. ~ Joey Dunn, Director, reviewed the upcoming n Commission. He stated that the following meetings November 21, 2005, Comprehensive Plan December 8, 2005, Workshop & Regular December 12, 2005, Joint Sub-Committee and Recreation Advisory Board - 6:30 p.m. Discussion and possible action o may inquire about a subject for w factual information or the recitation be limited to a proposal to place the and the Parks lanning and Zoning Member . A statement of specific ~ven. Any deliberation shall a subsequent meeting. interested in knowing how the City's paid stated that he would like to review parking Commissioner Reynolds • Scott Shafer, ~a.irman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services P&Z Workshop Minutes November 17, 2005 agenda items has not bee s may the Planning and Zoning Page 2 of 2 MINUTES Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission • ~ Thursday, November 17, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Council Chambers, College Station City Hall Planning tr Devdopma,t Servicer 1101 Texas Ave n u e College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Christiansen and Ken Reynolds. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Acting Chairman Bill Davis, Scott Shafer Harold CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Hitchcock, Lindsay Boyer, Crissy Hard, and Jennt Assistant City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Graduate Civil I Ken Fogle, Director Joey Dunn, Assistant Director L~ OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: Center Representative Brian Cook. 1. • 2. 3. Call meeting to order. Planner Molly er, Senior tion Planner Lisa Lindgren. Carla Robinson and Action sio~and possible action on a Final Plat for the Valley Park 4 ots on 11.63 acres generally located at the northwest corner Parkway (FM 2818) and Raymond Stotzer Parkway (FM 60). Present on, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Williams Creek Phase consisting of 27 lots on 77.6 acres generally located at Greens Prairie Road and Rock Prairie Road East. Case #05-192 (]R) C Commissioner Christiansen motioned to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner Reynolds seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0). Sanford, Dennis P8~Z Minutes Regular Agenda November 17, 2005 Page 1 of 3 Regular Agenda. • 4. Discussion and possible action on requests for absence from meetings. John Nichols -November 17, 2005, Workshop & Regular Meeting Scott Shafer -November 17, 2005, Workshop & Regular Meeting Harold Strong -November 17, 2005, Workshop & Regular Meeting Commissioner Reynolds motioned to approve the requests for absence. Commissioner Marsha Sanford seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0). • 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on items removed Commission action. No items were removed. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Pr ary T College Station consisting of four (4) lots on 73.49 g er; of Wellborn Road between Southwest Parkw d Harvey Case #05-151(TF) ~ Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, presented the pry zonings are in place and comply with the land use Commissioner Christiansen Commissioner Reynolds seco~ to motion Consent Agenda by The Woodlands of along the east side way (FM 2818). Mr. Fletchefstated that the .e preliminary plat. (4-0). 7. Public hearing, presentation, discussi pos on on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to and Use Pla om Indus R&D to Residential Attached and Regional Retail an ar silting of 2 2 acres and generally located north of Raymond Stotzer Par 60) b en Turkey k oad and FM 2818. Case #05-186 (TF) Trey Fletcher, Senio omprehensive Plan Amendment. The request was 1 R Resi a ttached and Regional Retail. Mr. Fletcher stated the Re etail onent consists of approximately 4 acres and Residential ched consis appr y 22 acres. Staff recommended denial of both onents. Greg , Munici Development Group, College Station, Texas. Mr. Taggart spoke in favor of mere sive Plan Amendment. t;ommissione istiansen motioned to approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment recommend to City Council. Commissioner Reynolds seconded the motion passed (3-1). Commissioners in favor, Christiansen, Reynolds and Sanford. Commissioners opposed, Davis. • 8. Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for an area consisting of 26.3 acres located at the intersection of Arrington Road at Greens Prairie Road to amend the Land Use Plan from Institutional and Regional Retail to Regional Retail. Case #05-177 (TF) Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Staff recommended approval of the request in its entirety. P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda November 17, 2005 Page 2 of 3 Commissioner Christiansen motioned to recommend approval of the Comprehensive • Plan Amendment as submitted. Commissioner Sanford seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0). 9. L' 10. Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for an area consisting of 55.9 acres located between Greens Prairie Road and Arrington Road to amend the Land Use Plan from Single-family Residential Medium Density to Regional Retail and from Single-family Residential Medium Density to Residential Attached. Case #05-189 (TF) Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, presented the Con recommended approval of the request to amend Residential Medium Density to Regional Retail and r amend the 16.3 acres from Single-family Resi~ Attached. Judy Lienez, 1356 South Oaks, College recommendation. Joe Schultz, 1707 Graham Road, the project and the possibility o1 environment instead of Regional Single Family Residential. Commissioner the request fra of staff's Mr. Schultz spoke in reference to fice environment or a medical preferred not to leave it ~uppo s recommendation to approve ti Medi Density to Regional Retail and Single-family Residential Medium Density ~rd seconded the motion, motion passed Commissioner Sanford seconded the Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services • College Station, T~ attves such as also stated Amendment. Staff from Single-family ~l of the request to situ to Residential P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda November 17, 2005 Page 3 of 3 • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Report Date: December 27, 2005 Email: mhitchcock@cstx.gov Meeting Date: January 5, 2006 Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Development Plat for the Olden Homeplace consisting of one lot on 28.61 acres generally located on Rock Prairie Road East, across from the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency landfill. Applicant: David Mayo of Joe Orr, Inc., agent for Dolly Olden, owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the development plat. Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Development Plat, which is required under Article 3 of the UDO. The property owner is seeking to establish an approximately 28-acre home site (along with barns) on a 200-acre family property zoned A-O Agricultural Open. A Development Plat must conform to the City's Comprehensive Plan, current and future City facilities, and extension of infrastructure. A Development Plat allows the City to require dedication or construction of infrastructure to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. The subject property is located on Rock Prairie Road East, across from the landfill. Acquisition of property is needed for the expansion of Rock Prairie Road East, but the City has already begun a separate right-of-way acquisition process; therefore, dedication has not been requested to be shown on the plat. Water service to the subject property is by the Wellborn SUD in the Wellborn certificated area (CCN). As development plats are authorized by the UDO and not regulated by the Subdivision Regulations, the requirement for fire flow does not apply to the plat. Fire protection is required by the Fire Code and the Fire Marshal has allowed for an alternative method. Sewage will be handled through on-site septic. This plat is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and minimum infrastructure standards. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The area is shown on the Land Use Plan to be Single Family Low Density (1/3 to 2 dwelling units per acre). This portion of Rock Prairie Road East is shown to be a minor arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. Item Background: The first 250 feet (approximately) of this property was annexed into the City in 1983. The back portion was annexed in 2002. It has been zoned A-O since annexation. The property has never been platted. • • Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board unanimously voted to accept a fee in lieu of land dedication for this plat at their December 13, 2005 regular meeting. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the development plat. The options regarding the development plat are: ^ Approval with conditions; ^ Approval as submitted; or ^ Denial. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Copy of Development Plat • • v ~ ^~o ~ r G y~'~ro `• ,~'i ~ O I.L. `,~ ~" w O , < w 0 ~~d~,/ O o '`zj M < N N O o i ~.~ae N (~ U o w ` U o ~. w Q ~ o o _ ~ ~ z ~ w o 6 ~ O 8 ~ ~ ~ W -~' ~ 0 5w L O J W ~•a W o Q o ~ 0 0 0 ~~ ^ o i 1 ITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning dlkvelopment Services ~~ FOR OFFIC U5~o~3 P8Z CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: DEVELOPMENT PLAT APPLICATION The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline da+~ fnr a~~ rr.,.,,.,,teso.... ____:~___«_.. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ......~~.~.. vv..v..AV~q•.V~~• N/A Filing Fee of $400.00 N/A Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable): N/A Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) X Application completed in full. X Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original. must be submitted after staff review.) N/A One (1) copy of the approved Final Plat. (if applicable) X Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. N/A Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with. this plat (if applicable). X Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of annrnval (if annlir•~hlc\ APPLICOTInN Here Date of Required Preapplication Conference:-- November 22.2005 ~ME OF SUBDIVISION Olden Homealace SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) North of Rock Prairie Road 3200 feet west of the intersection of Rock Prairie Road and Greens Prairie Road. APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name David R. Mavo (Joe Orr Inc ) Street Address 2167 Post Oak Circle City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845 E-Mail Address dmavo(c~mvriad.net Phone Number 979-690-3378 Fax Number N/A PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION;,. Name -Dolly C. Olden- Street Address 7804. Rock Prairie Road East City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845 E-Mail Address N/A Phone Number 979X690-6819 Fax. Number N/A CHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Surveyor Name Joe Orr Inc. Street Address 2167 Post Oak Circle City College Station 6/13/03 Page 1 of 3 State Texas Zip~„~de 77845 Phone Number 979-690-3378 E-Mail Addr~„~ dmavo(c'i7mvriad.net Fax Number N/A Acreage ~ Total Property 28.99 acres Total # Of Lots 1 R-O-W Acreage 0.13 acres fisting Use: As~ri,~ culture Proposed Use: As~rlculture umber Of Lots By Zoning District 1 / AO / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 28.86 /AO Floodplain Acreage 0.00 A Statement Addressing Any Differences Between The Development Plat and the Final Plat: (If Applicable): N/A Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: None Requested Oversize Participation: None Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: 0 Streets 0 Sidewalks 0 Sanitary Sewer Lines 0 Water Lines 0 Channels 0 Storm Sewers 0 Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: ~,a ~_ # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ ~ S6 (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. ~ ' Owner December 2.2005 Signatur and Title Date 6/13/03 Page 2 of 3 • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Crissy Hartl Report Date: December 16, 2005 Email: chart) aC~.cstx.gov Meeting Date: January 5, 2006 Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on a Replat of Lot 1 Block 1 of the T.J. Addition & Lot 1 Block 1 of C.S.L. of Texas Inc. Subdivisions on 2.001 acres generally located at the corner of Sebesta Rd. and State Highway 6. Applicant: Tony Jones Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the final plat. Item Summary: This plat is in preparation for an office building on Lot 1 Block 1 of C.S.L. of Texas Inc. by adding 0.024 acres from Lot 1 Block 1 of the T.J. Addition. This plat also includes the relocation of a 10' public utility easement onto the applicant's property. The easement is being relocated from Lot 1 of the T.J. Addition to the adjacent property, Lot 1 of C.S.L of Texas. This relocation has been approved by all appropriate authorities due to the lack of infrastructure in • this easement. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates this area as Retail Regional. The surrounding areas have requested a Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment, but the land use will not change for this property. The office building will take access from Sebesta Road, a minor collector. This plat meets the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance and is in compliance with all subdivision regulations. Item Background: The subject property was annexed in 1971 and subsequently zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential. The property was rezoned to C-1 General Commercial under two separate ordinances in 1980 and 1981 and platted in 1997. Lot 1 Block 1 of C.S.L. of Texas is partially developed with an office building taking access from the State Highway 6. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the final plat. The options regarding the Replat are: ^ Approval with conditions; ^ Approval as submitted; ^ Denial; • Si 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. .7 apporting Materials: Location Map Aerial Map Application Infrastructure and Facilities Copy of Replat U O '~d~by ~ a~ ~ ~ a r ~ t7 ~` wa W • r ~ ~ ~ J~~bi '. Q ~' m m ~ m'M O ~ ai~ an .~. r,. an LL A~ dJ ®' O N ~ ~ ~ '.~q~d ~ n ' ~ i ~ ~ r N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r Y ~ W ~ N A N ~ ~~ ' O W ~~ ~ ~4 ~ 0~0~a N P h0 ~ t ~ m dN ~ I~ ~ ~O 1f1 ~ a m ~ O N 'Vi~~ O ~ ~ ' N tiyJ~ a O ~ ~ W R v~ O ~ U o!f ~ ~ $y ~ yu S O ~ ~ ~ H o V ninpp _ ~ Q • v ~ ~ J U otS STATE HWY 8 - (EARL RUDDER FREEWAY SOUTH) ~~ °*' m ~~ ~' A a ~* ~ ~, ~ $ W ~ WN' O ~ ~ 9~ ~, N ~ ~ Y~g MM m Q u m ~ ~ ~ e m ~ 4~m pQ- #r rk Q ~ O n ao ~~ ~ m Q ~ a ~ a ~ ~ I ~ ~ ,y oo ~e,~~ q~kam e' ~ °y~J`~j ~ ~ L ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ W m ~ r r. ~ ~,, ~ W ~ ~ V ~ ~ a~' ~ . o ~ ~ _~ T. NO' vF mm ~'~G ~~ ~ a 1 h ~ ~ ~~, ~J O • 4 0 ~ ~ ~ as ~° ~ a a ~~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning ~ Developmrnt Service {~ .` ,t. FOR OFFICE S O LY P8Z CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 3 , ~Y~,, (Check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending ^ Final ^ Vacating ®Replat (5300.00) (:300.00) (6400.00) (6400.00) (:600.00)• "Includes publ(c hearing fee Is this plat in the ETJ4 ^ Yes No ~ ne rollowing Items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for Pd~Z Commisslon conslderatlon. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: / Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet N A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) Nf~, Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). I~ Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) Application completed in full. ~L Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). / Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) ~ One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). / Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. / A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. .~ Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of aDDroval (if anolicablel. Date of Preapplication Conference: i r tv r w•a ~ nnc~~ i vt a NAME OF SUBDIVISION ~T~ ~. /~ DD rrl oN ~ C' S. L • ©F TExA- , 1 N G ~p D tTl o N SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot 8~ Block) LoT ~,~ gi~~ 1 s Lar T loGK1 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary. Contact for the Project): 3a D~ Name ~ oN `( >~ Street Address 32O S EARL, P.uDA ER ~/ Y S City ~ol lead 5}d~i ot~l State 'r~C Zip Code '1 r1 ~j ~}S E-Mail Address , ~ 6~r. Co m Phone Number ~~ Fax Number - ~'~} ~ PROPERTY OWNER'S NFORMA~ION ( ICI owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name _ ToN~! ao~tES ~~xc abo^rc~ 2v-J. $RY~L1 6R~MM IT Street Address ~l'ZOo1 ~Y) ~~ ,~ FV~~ S City l~o I~~a~ ~~.~"io n State Zip Code rl~l ~ ~-~ E-Mail Address ~o b i . ~o m Phone Number w ~l ~ ~' 2$ 3 5 Fax Number _ ~ 9 " Coq ~ (Q ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: SuRV~`(oR Name __ Ct3 P.TI ~ S-r-~or~i ~ ~'f~~'NG Su R~tE `f lit G • Street Address _ 1~12'L. ~KoA-pMoo~ L,,ut-L1~ IDS Ci 1J ty State ~ Zip Code '1'1 ~ O2 E-Mail Address ~'yr'~~`~ ®S~rohc} „-.~~..; r,Q,~p~ Phone Number ~ Co - q ~3 p Fax Number '1'~ 1- OOoI (v 6/13/03 1 of 6 {~ •Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? Yes No Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page # Acreage ~ Total Property 2.00 a- Total # of Lots ~. R-O-W Acreage N ENE Existing Use: Covv-.rv~rGG a.~ Proposed Use: Cor~nvv~er'ci a ~ Number of Lots By Zoning District _~ / C ~- / / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: / / / Floodplain Acreage N n n) E A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: Requested Oversize Participation: Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: Streets Sidewalks Sanitary Sewer Lines Water Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Piat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and cert~es that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-identified final plat and attests thaf this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. l! o~ Date 6/13/03 2 of 6 • INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water required for plat: a 12" water main is located across Sebesta Rd. from the subject property. Water Service: a 12" water main is located across Sebesta Rd. from the subject property. Sewer required for plat: the subject property is currently served by an on-site septic or aerobic system as there are no sanitary sewer mains adjacent to this property. The on-site system is permitted by the Brazos County Health Department Sewer Service: the subject property is currently served by an on-site septic or aerobic system as there are no sanitary sewer mains adjacent to this property. The on-site system is permitted by the Brazos County Health Department Street(s) required for plat: N/A Streets/Access: access to this property will be taken off Sebesta Rd. • Off-site Easements required for plat: N/A Drainage: the subject property is located with in the Bee Creek Tributary "A" drainage basin. Storm water run-off from this property discharges directly into a concrete channel/drainage easement located on-site. Flood Plain: none on-site Oversize request: See Budgetary and Financial Summary Section. Impact Fees: none Parkland Dedication Fees: none for this commercial site • • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves Report Date: December 19, 2005 Email: jreeves@cstx.gov Meeting Date: January 5, 2006 Item: Presentation, possible action and discussion on a Variance Request to the Subdivision Regulations Section 8.J.2 Block Length, and on a Preliminary Plat for the Castlerock Subdivision consisting of 295 lots on 76.65 acres, generally located north of Castlegate Subdivision along the east side of State Highway 40. Applicant: DDH Investments, property owner Staff Recommendations: If the Commission is in support of granting the variance to the minimum block length of 1,200 feet, which is regulated by Section 8.J.2 of the Subdivision Regulations, then staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with a variance. The variance to the block length requirement is proposed for blocks 1 & 10. As justification the applicant states that: "The Castlerock Subdivision cannot connect to the adjacent property except in one location, the extension of • Castlerock Parkway to the west. The adjacent property is either a Conservation Zone or Deed Restricted area. This property, per the CORPS of Engineers (COE) permit, cannot be developed because it serves as the mitigation area for impacts to the wetlands, riparian areas and Navasota Ladies Tresses due to the development of the Crowley tract". It appears that there will be a greenbelt to break up the blocks into separate sections that are less than 1,200 feet; therefore, staff is in support of this plat as submitted if the Commission is in favor of granting the variance to the block length. SECTION 5: VARIANCES 5_A The Commission may authorize a variance from the regulation when, in their opinion, undue hardship will result from requiring strict compliance. In granting a variance, the Commission shall prescribe only conditions that it deems not prejudicial to the public interest. In making the findings herein before required, the Commission shall take into account the nature of the proposed use of the land involved, the existing use of land in the vicinity, the number of persons who will reside or work in the proposed subdivision, the possibility that a nuisance will be created, and the probable effect of such variance upon traffic conditions and upon • public health, convenience, and welfare of the vicinity. No variance shall be granted unless the Commission finds: • 5-A.1 That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; 5-A.2 That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; 5-A.3 That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and 5-A.4 That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. 5-B Such findings of the Commission, together with the specific facts upon which such findings are based, shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the meetings at which such variance is granted. Variances may be granted only when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter so that public health, safety, and welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. • Item Summary: The applicant is proposing to develop 295 lots on approximately 76.6 acres. The property is located north of Castlegate Subdivision along the east side of State Highway 40. The proposed lots are approximateey 0.16 of an acre and will have access onto residential streets. Secondary emergency access is proposed on State Highway 40 until Castlerock Parkway is extended with development of the adjacent property. Castlerock Parkway is classified as a minor collector on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. This development is located in impact fee area 97-01. Current fee for this area is $349.55 per living unit equivalent (LUE). Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The subject property is shown on the Land Use Plan as Single Family Medium Density. The applicant has proposed 295 residential lots on 76.662 acres (3.85 dwelling units/acre) with approximately 3.5 acres of buffers, 3 acres of greenbelt, and 5.9 acres of park area. The preliminary plat meets the density standards of the Comprehensive Plan. The plat also meets the Concept Plan adopted by the DRB. All minimum standards are those of R-1 Single Family Residential, except where meritorious modifications for building setbacks and lot widths were approved with the concept plan. The DRB does not have the authority to grant subdivision . variances, but recommend the block length variance be granted by the P&Z. • Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the City limits in April of 1995 and is currently zoned Planned Development District (PDD). Budgetary 8< Financial Summary: None requested. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board recommended to accept park land dedication of 5.863 acres. A 1.5-acre portion was dedicated with the Spring Creek Townhome development. The associated development fee for the 1.5 acres was also previously accepted in the amount of $105,610. The actual park land to be dedicated with this development is a total of 4.363 acres, which is adjacent to the 1.5-acre parcel. While the DRB has no authority over Subdivision variances, they did recommend approval of the block length variance at their October meeting, when they considered the Concept Plan for the development. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Infrastructure and Facilities 5. Copy of Preliminary Plat • 6. Variance Request Letter • i~ ~ a s~~~~ O }' a ~ Q ~g ~ a =, D. ~J a a ^ r ~ ,, o ~ a I ~ C~ a N `( % \ r ~('v` / 1 S R z .rga G ,. x a a P ~ r r d' d' ~- w ~~r ~Y~~ r ~~ 0 a O a ma -. ~ ~ ~ ~ a" 9 O O Q ~/ N i 0 N N U ~ R Y e R v °s _ " F V $ a s ~Oy/ 7 R . $'. LL ~R F 9 g r A e $ w ^ ~ J a s ~ a ' sR Q A ~dt 6 B i~, u ~~~ g Z S S ry ~ ~ S 8 A R A p '° R ad~r~ A R A ~ 3 S i S R ~~ 3 8 Y- ~ 8 A ' o A ~ p ~6 ~ R IN ~ R F R A ~ a R @ ~ A Q B e i ^ ' X ~ ~ / a '= W a A a ~' d a W s ~' a ~ 0.. r ~ O ~~~ ~ ~ ~ F c i W s ~ O F G ^a i cd" a n :g ~~ ~~ • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLtnning d' ArrKlopmrnt Srrviar ~~ FOR OFFICE USE ONLdY P8Z CASE NO.:~ ` ~' 1 DATE SUBMITTED: ~- ~'S b PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: / Filing Fee of $400.00. / Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) / Application completed in full. / Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) One (1) copy of the approved Master Plan if applicable. / A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. ~ Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed. _~ Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks 8 Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). ~~Py~'Ve.d h.~ ~an~.s ~,..~( ~,,,? (fit Zpps- Date of Preapplication Co//n~~ference: q/2'7 f2t~ NAME OF SUBDIVISION l kt.~,~y'0~ ~~ • S~~PppECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION G+~Cer~Gi (~YOYJ~S~? ~~' u. ~ 3~7 ~ZaflS ~ ~ ~ ~'~ North n-1- a~ ~-t t~1w~r,d~V ~c.~~ APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFO RMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): " Name ~1 ~ , ~l~V~ ~ f.0 ~-~'~r~n C.t~CtS T-v~G ~ Street Address ~ ` ' ,. City ~~~2Ap S-~"c.~e-~,-, State ~ Zip Code E-Mail Address -- Phone Number ~~p-'"1'LC'p Fax Number (o~p - tom}- I .PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners Name l~[~--f• ~-~la~~~~_~,~ Street Address `tc., • ' City ~ c~~2.Q~. a~io~, State ~_ Zip Code _~ ~ ( ~ _ E-Mail Address -r Phone Number ~q'[~ .- "~ Zip Fax Number t'n~p - t pLl.~ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name ~-~.kGiiVil -~ ~pe, ~~_~, ~ Street Address '~'~~'~ C7V'OL,I>-Gt.lm _ City ~~ IMP ~~t~7^ov~ State ~ Zip Code ~ E-Mail Address ~ St.~.~~,~,~+~~.~~oy np f'-- • Phone Number _~~~'~ ~~~ Fax Number 7~ -7-~ ~ q ~„I ~;u; ~ ~~I' J `. C, Total Acres Of Subdivision ~P. q' aL R-O-W Acreage .~OOQG. Total # Of lots ~°~~ Number Of Lots By Zoning District ~~ / PDi7 / / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: .] Floodplain Acreage __~._,~aL _ Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? A statement addressing any differences between the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan (if applicable) ~ /A~ Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same .~~_~-~ ~~~~~~ ;,,~ ,r„~ ~~~ . Requested oversize participation _ ~lm~ ~,qc~p s'~" Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of Acres to be dedicated # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above identified plat and attests that all respective owners have been identified on this application. ,~ • Signature and Title • ~ ~0~ Date ~,; i ;fir;; ..r., • INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water required for plat: Each lot is required to have public water service, as shown on the plat. A looped system will be extended from an existing 24-inch water in State Highway 40 ROW. Water Service: Water to be provided to each structure, as required. Sewer required for plat: Each lot is required to have public sewer service, as shown on the plat. Sewer service will be extended from existing 18-inch and 21- inch mains located along the northwest boundary of the property. Sewer Service: Sewer to be provided to each structure, as required. Street(s) required for plat: All streets shown on plat are required for this subdivision. Castlerock Parkway is a Minor Collector on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. Streets/Access: Secondary Emergency Access is proposed off State Highway 40 until Castlerock Parkway is extended with the development of the adjacent property. Off-site Easements required for plat: None required at this time. Drainage: Drainage will be to Spring Creek. A regional detention pond was . constructed to offset post-development drainage impacts to downstream areas. Flood Plain: The 100-year floodplain within this subdivision does not affect any of the proposed lots. Oversize request: None requested at this time. Impact Fees: The development is located within the Sprin Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area 97-01. Currently, the impact fee is 349.55 per living unit equivalent. Parkland Dedication Fees: The Parks Board recommended to accept park land dedication of 5.863 acres. A 1.5-acre portion was dedicated with the Spring Creek Townhome development. The associated development fee for the 1.5 acres was also previously accepted in the amount of $105,610. The actual park land to be dedicated with this development is a total of 4.363 acres, which is adjacent to the 1.5 acre parcel. C7 • '~. ~ ~ I ~-~~~~ G '. ~ d Castlerock Subdivision ,~ Preliminary Plat Requested Variances to Subdivision Regulations REQUESTED VARIANCES TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS & REASON FOR SAME: Section 8-J.2 -Block Length This section requires that block length shall not exceed 1,200' in single family residential subdivisions. The Developer requests a variance to this requirement to allow the block length to be increased to greater than 1,200' for Blocks 1 & 10. The length of each block as shown on the Preliminary Plat is as follows: Block 1-1,890' Greenbelt accessways (Common Areas) break the block into 1,075' and 815'sections. Block 10 -1,510' Greenbelt accessways (Common Areas) break the block into 75 ', 1,090' and 345' seCtlons. L` • L Castlerock Subdivision Preliminary Plat Justification for Variance Section 8-J.2 -Blocks This section requires that block length shall not exceed 1,200' in single family subdivisions. The Developer requests a variance to this requirement. A.1 That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The special circumstance for Blocks 1 & 10 is that the Castlerock Subdivision cannot connect to the adjacent property except in one location, the extension of Castlerock Parkway to the west. The adjacent property is either a Conservation Zone or Deed Restricted Area. This property, per the Corps of Engineers (COE) permit, cannot be developed because it serves as the mitigation area for the impacts to wetlands, riparian areas and Navasota Ladies Tresses due to the development of the Crowley Tract. A.2 That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; • In order to develop the Subdivision as planned this variance is necessar . Y A.3 That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; Granting this variance should not have any effect on the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area since the lengths of Blocks 1 & 10 do not exceed the maximum length requirement if you consider that the greenbelts break up the blocks into separate sections, which are less than 1,200 in length. Additional connecting streets through Blocks 1 & 10 to extend into the adjacent property would not be allowed by the COE. A.4 That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The adjacent land will not be developed except for recreational uses. The granting of this variance will not prevent the orderly subdivision of other land in the area. • • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Trey Fletcher Report Date: December 20, 2005 Email: tetcher@cstx.gov Meeting Date: January 5, 2006 Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat -Replat for the University Park Ph 2 consisting of one (1) lot on 4.7 acres generally located at 1000 Spring Loop. Applicant: Greg Taggart, applicant for Alton Ofczarcak, property owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval/denial of the replat Item Summary: This item is for the consideration of a Replat of Lots 4-9, Block U in University Park Phase II to prepare for R-4 Multi-Family Development. Access will be directly to Spring Loop removing the need to maintain the Public Access Easements in the existing configuration. Secondary, emergency access will be to a public alley to the southwest. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan reflects this tract as Residential Attached. The Thoroughfare Plan shows Spring Loop as a Major Collector (80' ROW). This application is vested from this requirement. No • additional right-of--way is necessary. Item Background: The parcel was rezoned from A-P, Administrative- Professional to R-4, Multi-family earlier this year. In 1992, Ordinance No. 1957 rezoned property from A-P, Administrative-Professional to C-B, Commercial- Business with the condition that a final plat be filed that combined the subject properties into one lot. No such plat was ever filed and the zoning change never took effect. In 2003, under the UDO the C-B districts were combined with C-1, General Commercial. Budgetary & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Copy of Replat NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle: 12-20-2005 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 1-5-2006 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 27 • Response Received: None as of date of staff report ~ ~ o ~ ~p1606 ~~ r.~ d' rr c~ op m~ ~ c~ "~ ~~j F 1 ^~Lh ~ 1, ,~.~ ^ °'~1 ~ ~ R wa ^_ ^~~h ~ tj llli r X219 i ~ ~, ti~ ~ 6rl/ 0 .,ti` ~ti ~ .~ti` `L ~ti ., r" ~ ~,~,~ ~ \~ ~ ~ Op \1,~ 1~ O ^ ~ YI O 0~ ^ ti ~Op ~O \ O ~ ~ ^ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ h ry J O O O ti~ ~; ~ `~ ~ Q ~° ~ ^ ~ Q ~ ~ ~~ o o a ~. G~ o ^o ~~ ~~ 1104 0 ~,=' ° ~ ~ '~ ~j ~d d ~ 10 1112 r l la ~ v- S ~ j1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ d ~, ~ ',p8 \ ` ^~ \ti~ ~ Oa ~ o a N ~1 ` r ~ m v \o~ o o 0 ~ '`~ ~ o ^ '~qp3 405 401 409 R `~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ o ~ P ~ ° 4p 40~ o ~ ~ ~ o Y ~a 401 ~ o ^ OO ^ ppJpp //~~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ - V ~^ lY O ^ O ^~ ~ o ~ ~ 1004 S _ qp9 m ~ o Yho ~ O qp~ ~ qp '` ~ "~'~ ' 8 ~, o mpg U g°j ~' y}9 8 ~ ~ oo ~~ ~~~' J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °~ g S g '~' ~ ~~ ~ J,~' ^ o~ ~ a y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~'C ~ O o ~""~ Mp O e ^ ° ~ gpti vo ~ .~ 921 ~ ~~, O 0 3 d- ¢' o o o ~ ~ ^ ~ "' °° vm o, ILN~ ~~ ~ m ~ "'~ ~ ~ O ~' O o o U p a -~ °j Z C~~'~ ^ ~ ~ a 5 Q ~~ ~ v Y U 204 ~ °~ m m m ~ ~ ~ c° ^ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ^ ~. 1 V FAO fqU <.7W Y ~ V `V V ~( pp J m ~ m /_` a ~O ~ ~ o .~ ~ ~P ~ ~ ^ N 0 0 z O r-1 r ~-~ ~'~ ;- Is there a temporary blanket easemQent on this property? If so, please provide the Volume ~ ~ and Page # creage ~ Total Property 4:G-( ~G C~ Total # Of Lots ! R-O-W Acreage u~~ ~Exisflng Use: b- Proposed Use: ~DW K~d-"'`'~~ ~'"~ Number Of Lots By Zo ng District 1 /~~ / j / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: / A~ ~ / / / Floodplain Acreage ~ A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): ~~ Requested Variances To Subdivision Requested Oversize Participation: Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: Streets ks S rn ry Sewer Lines ater Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Reason For Same 6 c_~ Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: ~~ of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ OSeB (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. i The applicant has prepared this application -and certifies that the facts stated herein'and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of ~ollege Station of the above-identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. . ; i I Signature and Title Date • 6/13/03 2 of S • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Trey Fletcher, Sr. Planner Report Date: December 28, 2005 Email: tletcher@cstx.gov Meeting Date: January 5, 2006 Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on a Rezoning for the Augustus Babille Tract A from A-O Agricultural-Open to C-1 General Commercial, consisting of 2 lots on 22.752 acres, generally located at the intersection of Greens Prairie Road and Arrington Road. (05-00500172) Applicant: J.L. Gant, property owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. Item Summary: The property owner is requesting the rezoning A-O Agricultural- Open to C-1 General Commercial to "create a commercial zoning district which is of sufficient size for regional retail uses." Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The rezoning request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Plan shows this area as Regional Retail. This Land Use Plan designation is described as "areas permitting • regional-scale development of tax-generating developments such as retail centers, service commercial, restaurants, etc." Further, "these uses are generally dependent on good access to highways and major arterials." The purpose of the C-1 General Commercial district is "to provide locations for general commercial purposes, that is, retail sales and service uses that function to serve the entire community and its visitors." The subject parcels are generally located at the intersection of Greens Prairie Road (future SH 40) and Arrington Road. Greens Prairie Road is classified as a Minor Arterial; SH 40 is classified as a Freeway with a planned grade separation at Arrington Road, which is a Major Collector. SH 40 is a new State facility under construction and will connect SH 6 to Wellborn Road (FM 2154). The estimated completion date is summer 2006. In anticipation of this roadway, Greens Prairie Road will be realigned to the southeast and intersect with Arrington Road. The Thoroughfare Plan shows a planned realignment of Arrington Road at a future grade separation with SH 40. In aggregate, the parcels located in the vicinity of Greens Prairie Road and SH 6 form a primary commercial node similar to those that exist at Rock Prairie Road at SH 6, and FM 2818 at Texas Avenue. • Item Background: The 0.187-acre tract was annexed in 1993 and the 22.565- acre tract was annexed in 1983. Both parcels were zoned A-O at the time of annexation. Neither parcel has ever been platted. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment was approved by City Council on December 15, 2005, designating this property as Retail Regional. There are currently several transportation improvement projects in the area, including improvements to Greens Prairie Road, the re-alignment of Arrington Road, and the construction of State Highway 40. The Brazos County Rural Fire Station for Precinct 1 will be relocated as development occurs on these parcels. Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted; 2. Recommend denial; 3. Table; or, 4. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map • 3. Application 4. Infrastructure and Facilities +` l e -~ ~/ FO F~,CE USE ONLY CASE.NO. -" DATE SUBMITTED '~ "' ITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning er Development Su•vices lly ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION "~~ MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission or City Council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for .consideration: / Application completed in full. ~ $500.00 application fee Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. / Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). • The Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. A CAD (dxf/dwg) or GIS (shp) digital file may be required for more complex rezoning requests. Date of Required Preapplication Conference:~~1~ ~Z ~ 2WS ~PLICANT'S INFORMATION: Name ,~. L . C-~tw~ Street Address I~Z~ (2ai,^, (, ~~_v-~ City ~~(y--~ State Tk Zip Code 'l '"7 QQ~3 E-Mail Address Phone Number ~$ ~ ^ - ZZdZ Fax Number PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name _ J • ~ • ~a Street Address ~3Z3~d Ra_ir, Li ~~~ ~ h~ City .1-~c~-4-pv~ State Zip Cod ~~ E-Mail Address Phone Number 2,c~ ~^ ~ ~ -- 2 2 ~~ Fax Number q - 6 - ? (p This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated `1 3 and recorded in Volume l'as0 Page 2-~ of the Brazos County Deed Records. General Location of Property: (~~,~L~~ hrQ;;r~ Address of Property: ~ (p~ ~.Q~g .~Y~ r- IZ~oo~ Legal Description: Acreage -Total Pi ~isfing Zoning: J),r.- O Proposed Zoning: G~ ~ Present Use of Property: ~(~~~k • Proposed Use of Property: ~-ov~ci~~~t- 6%~ 3/03 i'aye 1 of "'~ '0/28/2005 15:31 28153111 ~ WESTHEIMERKWIKOPY~ ~'~ PAGE 03 R~ZONIN® BUPPOR7INQ INFGRMATION 9.a List the changed Gr changing concilUons In the area or in the City which m8~ka this zpne change • necessary. 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the ComprQhensivg Plan, if it Is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. • 'S _~ s~'eS~.y1l~. -~ yiltm~ w ~]_~, ~1.,G~, c~c.r ~~~ Ct~lrc~l ..fG, t ~ ~Vt 5 The applicant has prepared this appliGa.ian and supporting information and cer+Jfies tha# iha faces stated herein and exhfbtts attsrched hereto are true and corre~i. tFAPPLICAT-ON 1S F/d.ED r3Y ANYONE dTHEk' THAN THE OWNED OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATIQN MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BYA POWEl4 OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. ~G^~~~~ Sig a re of owner (or agent) or applicant ~ ~-- ~a a ~ Date • r,,3r~~ ~8gc ;~ vl ;~ u. 3.1 List any other reasons t0 support this zone change. o .~ o ~ ~ o_`~ ~~ i ... 0 a Z~ < ~ ~ ~a a ~ ~~ a a ~ d ~~~,. U r V N,~ ~ v N V ~~ s~' ~ ~ 6a ~ ~ t , ~~"~ , r ~ o e ~ ci ` ~ o ~ a I v a Cl c~i r O a -v ~ ~~ a Cd 0 7 S Y ~~ C7 Z_ Z O N ti r O Q~ U w Z W W rn _W J W I- W a W O a w s 0 a q • INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: There is an existing water main on the property. Water will need to be provided to all subdivided lots. Sewer: There is an existing sanitary sewer main in the area which could be extended to serve this property. Sanitary sewer will need to be provided to all subdivided lots. Streets: No streets on the Thoroughfare Plan are within this property. Off-site Easements: None at this time. Drainage: The majority of the property lies within the Alum Creek drainage basin. A small corner of the property drains to Spring Creek. Flood Plain: The property is not within FEMA designated floodplain. Oversize request: None requested at this time. Impact Fees: The majority of the property is located within the Alum Creek Sewer Impact Fee Area (97-02B). A portion of the property is located in the Spring Creek Sewer Impact Fee Area (97-01). Currently, the Impact Fees for these areas are $243.38 and $349.55 per Living Unit Equivalent, respectively. • NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 12-20-2005 and 1-10-2006 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 1-5-2006 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 1-26-2006 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 12 Response Received: None as of date of staff report • • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Trey Fletcher, Sr. Planner Report Date: December 28, 2005 Email: tetcher@cstx.gov Meeting Date: January 5, 2006 Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on a Rezoning for the Augustus Babille Tract B from A-O Agricultural-Open to C-1 General Commercial, consisting of 39.671 acres, generally located between Greens Prairie Road and Arrington Road. (05-00500188) Applicant: M. Mitchell Harper, property owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. Item Summary: The property owner is requesting the rezoning A-O Agricultural- Open to C-1 General Commercial to "create a commercial zoning district which is of sufficient size for regional retail uses." Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The rezoning request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Plan shows this area as Regional Retail. This Land Use Plan designation is described as "areas permitting • regional-scale development of tax-generating developments such as retail centers, service commercial, restaurants, etc." Further, "these uses are generally dependent on good access to highways and major arterials." The purpose of the C-1 General Commercial district is "to provide locations for general commercial purposes, that is, retail sales and service uses that function to serve the entire community and its visitors." The subject parcels are generally located between Greens Prairie Road (future SH 40) and Arrington Road. Greens Prairie Road is classified as a Minor Arterial; SH 40 is classified as a Freeway with a planned grade separation at Arrington Road, which is a Major Collector. SH 40 is a new State facility under construction and will connect SH 6 to Wellborn Road (FM 2154). The estimated completion date is summer 2006. In anticipation of this roadway, Greens Prairie Road will be realigned to the southeast and intersect with Arrington Road. The Thoroughfare Plan shows a planned realignment of Arrington Road through this parcel at a future grade separation with SH 40. In aggregate, the parcels located in the vicinity of Greens Prairie Road and SH 6 form a primary commercial node similar to those that exist at Rock Prairie Road at SH 6, and FM 2818 at Texas Avenue. • • The rezoning application also includes a request for R-4 Multi-family for a portion of the parcel. This component cannot be included for consideration since this part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment was denied by the City Council rendering the request not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Item Background: The property was annexed in 2002 and was zoned A-O Agricultural Open at that time. This property has ever been platted. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment was approved by City Council on December 15, 2005, designating this property as Retail Regional. There are currently several transportation improvement projects in the area, including improvements to Greens Prairie Road, the re-alignment of Arrington Road, and the construction of State Highway 40. Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted; 2. Recommend denial; 3. Table; or, • 4. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Infrastructure and Facilities • i• i• i• 3 ! Q ~ i Y a~' y P r V r V ~ ~ V N V ~~ ~`'~ ~° C{ N r V V r . -0`~ ° / t a e , O Q 0 °a iaaworowro J 1 M ~ ~ r O O Q R ~ ~ ~~ ~ Z d Z A n Q N W P R / ~C// 18 p ~ A ~ r F ~N~ a ~ N ¢ U MIaNOTON z ~Q a z /\ W \J> W W It V --tt V II~~ V c J ~j ~ N ~ M ~- CV ~ N M U U U f ~....~ FOR OFFICE U NLY CASE NO. • DATE SUBMITTED ~ ~ • CrrY OF COLLEGE STATION $• Planxing [3' Unlelnpmcrrnr Strvicts ~~~ ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning 8~ Zoning Commission or City ouncil. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: Application completed in full. $500.00 application fee Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and / e. All public and private rights-of--way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. ~/ Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot 8~ block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). The Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. A CAD (dxf/dwg) or GIS (shp) digital file may be required for more complex rezoning requests. Date of Required Preapplication Conference: ~eokew-be~r (~ _ ~~O~f .APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: Name Nll . ~fV<<-~'c~n~~1 ~'arnrv Street Address 2311 ~i Sfb ( ~Y.2~~' City r State E-Mail Addr ss ~• Zip Code ~1~OZ Phone Number 777 ' S~ 6s Fax Number 7 ~ ~ " SSG PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name i1Y!-.1M~y~~,4-~1.1 k~a~rnv.~r Street Address ?~rI1I -ri~~ ~{'Y ~~ City ~,r~ar- State TY Zip Code '"1'1~d0~- E-Mail Address Phone Number '1"11- S3(c~ Fax Number `1 "~°l - QS4,, This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated 1 IZ~_ and recorded in Volume ~, Page (.1~ of the Brazos County Deed Records. . General Location of Property:_ ~r,~,G~1S ~airiF. ~dL) ~~ ~ n~r ;,ncl.lon j2~ Address of Property: ~.P~xn I~it,irw TZ~ Legal Description: Acreage -Total Pi Existing Zoning: ~ - O Proposed Zoning: (t- ( ~ 1Z.-~1- •Present Use of Property: 1(Qlarl~ Proposed Use of Property: ~Ow-~_R~4si ~~,v-~:aa ~a,~ 6/13/03 Page 1 of 2 ~, ~~ ~=~ REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION •1.) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. •3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change. The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION /S FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. ~ ~~ ~/~ ~- ~a- z_o~ Signature of owner r agent or applicant Date • 6113/03 Page 2 of 2 • INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: The property is within the Wellborn Water Supply CCN for water. Fire flows will be required with development. Water will need to be provided to all subdivided lots. Sewer: There is an existing sanitary sewer main on the western boundary of the property. Sanitary sewer will need to be provided to all subdivided lots. Streets: Any thoroughfares in this area must be extended to its minimum design standard. Off-site Easements: None at this time. Drainage: Drainage is divided on the property between the Spring Creek and Alum Creek basins. Floodplain: The property is not within FEMA designated floodplain Oversize request: None requested at this time. Impact Fees: A portion of the property is located in the Spring Creek Sewer Impact Fee Area (97-01). Currently, the Impact Fee for this area is $349.55 per Living Unit Equivalent. NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 12-20-2005 and 1-10-2006 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 1-5-2006 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 1-26-2006 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners within 200': 11 Response Received: None as of date of staff report • • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 /Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM • December 27, 2005 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Molly Hitchcock, Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 2005 UDO Annual Review The Unified Development Ordinance annual review is required by the ordinance to provide for an on-going effort to keep the development codes of the City of College Station's current and relevant. Proposed changes have been mentioned in Attachment #1, Changes Proposed to the UDO (2005). An electronic version of the draft UDO may be viewed online at http://www.cstx.gov/home/index.asp?page=418. While public input continues, for logistical reasons, comments recently received have not been considered by staff for the 2005 review. These items have been added to a list for consideration either as separate ordinance items or as part of next year's annual review (which shall begin in the next few months). The public has the opportunity to bring these items before the P&Z and City Council as part of the public hearing process. Attachments 1. Changes Proposed to the UDO (2005) 2. Hard copies of changed pages to the draft since the Dec. 14th Joint City Council/P&Z Workshop, upon request C7 • Changes Proposed to the UDO (2005) ^ General housekeeping items-clerical corrections, consistent terminology, etc. Article 2 Development Review Bodies ^ Section 2.1.6.2 "Final Action" by the City Council to include annexations. ^ Section 2.2.D.2 "Recommendations" by the Planning & Zoning Commission to include annexations. ^ Section 2.2.D.3 "Final Action" by the Planning & Zoning Commission to include master plans and plats, remove alternative building material requests, remove appeals to the Administrator's decision that master plans are not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, and add appeals to the Administrator's decision to deny an amendment to the color palette for Northgate roof colors. • Section 2.2.E "Staff" to include Staff's ability to review ministerial acts approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission. ^ Section 2.4.D "Powers and Duties" of the Design Review Board to remove the review of Northgate developments and appeals to Northgate parking standards, to add the consideration of waivers to Northgate district standards, and to include consideration and final action on appeals to non-residential architectural standards. • Section 2.4.E "Staff" to remove staff site plan review delegated by the Planning & Zoning Commission and to remove staff approval of minor changes to building and sign materials and colors previously approved by the Design Review Board. ^ Section 2.5.6.4 "Final Action" to include the Administrator's ability to take final action on Northgate district site plans, the color palette for Northgate roof colors, and to consider alternative materials or standards for site construction as set forth in the City of College Station Design Guidelines. ^ Section 2.7.A "Designation" to change the designator of the Development Engineer from the Administrator to the City Engineer. ^ Section 2.7.C "Powers and Duties" to remove the Development Engineer's ability to approve or deny alternative materials or standards for site construction, but allow that person to make recommendations to the Administrator. ^ Section 2.8 "Summary of Review Authority" to clarify the proposed procedures related to the Wolf Pen Creek and Northgate districts and to add the procedure for master plans, development plats, and waivers to non-residential architectural standards to the table. • Section 2.8 "Summary of Review Authority" to remove the "Court" column. As a matter of law, any appeals to decisions made by the City may be appealed to a court of law when all other appeals have been exhausted.* C7 . Article 3 Development Review Procedures " ^ Section 3.3 Subdivision Plat Review to remove references to being formally" filed. There is no difference between being "filed" and being "formally filed".* ^ Section 3.3.A.1 "Applicability" to clarify that subdivision plat review includes those for replats-and amending plats. ^ Section 3.3.H "Minor Subdivision Plat Review" to clarify that amending plats are reviewed the same as minor plats. ^ Section 3.S.C "Application Requirements" to include non-residential architectural standards information as submittal requirements for site plans, when applicable. ^ Section 3.6 "Design District Site Plan Review" to have this section apply only to the Wolf Pen Creek district instead of the Wolf Pen Creek and Northgate design districts. ^ Section 3.6.A "Applicability" to remove solid waste changes, which are included in Section 3.6.D "Design District Minor Additions Approval Process" ^ Section 3.6.D "Design District Minor Additions Approval Process" to change to the site plan approval process. ^ Section 3.6.G "Additional Review Criteria for Northgate Districts" removed as site plans in Northgate are proposed to fall under the normal site planning • procedures. • Section 3.7 "Design District Building and Sign Review" to have this section apply only to the Wolf Pen Creek district instead of the Wolf Pen Creek district instead of the Wolf Pen Creek and Northgate design districts. ^ Section 3.8.4 "Review Criteria" to require development permits for clearing, filling, and/or grading to be compatible with an approved site plan or preliminary plat. ^ Section 3.9.A "Building Permit Required" to clarify that permits are also required for repairs, demolished, or occupancy changed. Also to identify the applicable building code. ^ Section 3.9.B "Application for Building Permit" to change the submittal requirement of two site plans to one site plan for single-family, duplex, or townhouses. ^ Section 3.9.B "Application for Building Permit" to include non-residential architectural standards information as submittal requirements for building permits, when applicable. ^ Section 3.10.A "Applicability" to clarify that Certificates of Occupancy are required when dictated by the 2003 International Building Code. • • Section 3.10.6 "Application" to clarify that a formal application is not made for a Certificate of Occupancy, but is issued after the required successful building inspections have been made. ^ Section 3.10.C "Review and Recommendation" deleted as there is not a formal application process for a Certificate of Occupancy. ^ Section 3.10.D "Review and Action by Building Official" to change the filing of an application for a Certil=tcate of Occupancy to a request. • Section 3.10.E "Temporary Certificate of Occupancy" to clarify that a temporary Certificate of Occupancy can be issued as provided in the building code. ^ Section 3.11.A "Applicability" to remove the applicability of Certificates of Completion as determined by the building code. ^ Section 3.11.6 "Application" to clarify that a formal application is not made for a Certificate of Completion, but is issued after the required successful building inspections have been made. ^ Section 3.11.C "Review and Recommendation" deleted as there is not a formal application process for a Certificate of Completion. ^ Section 3.11.D "Review and Action by Building Official" to change the filing of an application for a Certificate of Completion to a request and remove the • applicability of a Certificate of Completion for a land use. • Section 3.11.E "Unlawful to Occupy Without Valid Certificate of Completion" to remove references to occupying a structure and include references to utilizing a structure. ^ Section 3.15.6 "Applicability" to specifically identify that Administration Adjustments may only be considered for residential dimensional standards, non- residential dimensional standards, and design district dimensional standards instead of "any numerical zoning standard" in the UDO. Article 4 Zoning Districts ^ Section 4.1 "Establishment of Districts" to include the Krenek Tap Overlay in the summary table of districts. Article 5 District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards ^ Section 5.4 "Non-Residential Dimensional Standards" to increase the minimum lot sizes for the A-P, C-1, C-2, and C-3 zoning districts from 24'x100' each to 50'x100', 200'x200', 200'x200', and 50'x100', respectively. ^ Section 5.5.B "Planned Mixed-Use District (P-MUD)" to include areas shown on the Land Use Plan as Redevelopment as appropriate areas to be considered for P- MUD zoning. • Section 5.5.C "Planned Development District (PDD)" to allow for some mix of uses in a PDD. • Section 5.6.A.4 "Lighting" to remove lighting restrictions in the Wolf Pen Creek district that are redundant with Section 7.11.A "Site Lighting Design Requirements". ^ Section 5.6.A.6 "Relationship of Buildings to Site" to remove vague building siting requirements in the Wolf Pen Creek district and remove setback requirements that are in conflict with Section 5.7 "Design District Dimensional Standards". ^ Section 5.6.A.8 "Building Design" to remove a design standard that is vague and redundant with Section 7.9 "Nqn-Residential Architectural Standards". ^ Section 5.6.B "Northgate Districts (NG)" removed and replaced with a new ordinance section to regulate development in the Northgate districts. Included in this new section are: • Updated district descriptions; • Additional use standards to promote pedestrian-friendly uses and mixed uses; • More specific information on historic properties, acceptable treatments, and process for development proposals; • Building design standards that are similar the non-residential architectural standards that apply in other zoning districts in College Station, but altered to appeal to the pedestrian level; • On-street parking standards to facilitate the removal of head-in street parking and replacing with parallel on-street parking; • Off-street parking standards to set the number of spaces required for a project and the standards by which to develop the parking areas; • Bicycle parking standards (similar to previous bicycle parking standards); • Sidewalk standards to define sidewalk widths, location, and material; • Landscape and streetscape standards to require the planting of street trees, the provision of sidewalk benches, and regulate lighting and the placement of optional hardscape items such as newspaper racks; • Dumpster and mechanical equipment standards to regulate their location and their screening; • Detention pond screening standards; • Sign standards to clarify what types of signs are allowed, their placement, and their maximum sizes; • Outside storage and display standards; and • Waivers to the Northgate standards that may be considered by the Design Review Board. ^ Section 5.7 "Design District Dimensional Standards" removed and replaced with a new ordinance section. Changes that were made affect the development of projects in the Northgate districts. Section 5.8.A.2 "Signs" to remove a restriction that is redundant with Section 7.4 "Signs". ^ Section 5.8.A.4.e "Signs" to remove a standard that may come into conflict with Section 7.4.I "Attached Signs". • Article 6 Use Regulations" ^ Section 6.2.C Use Table to allow commercial daycares as permitted uses in P- MUDs; to allow drive-in/thru windows, health clubs/outdoor sports facilities, parking as a primary use, and radio/TV station/studios as permitted uses in NG-2 subject to supplemental standards, to remove fuel sales as a permitted use in NG-2, to remove theater as a conditional use in NG-3, and to allow unregulated wireless telecommunication facilities as permitted uses in all Northgate districts. ^ Section 6.3 "Specific Use Standards" to add supplemental standards for drive- in/thru windows, health clubs/outdoor sports facilities, parking as a primary use, and radio/TV station/studios. ^ Section 6.3.K "Manufactured Homes" to remove delivery route information from the requirements for a manufactured home Location Permit as it is already required for a Building Permit (Moving). ^ Section 6.3.X.2.b "Intermediate Facilities" to include antennae collocations onto existing transmission towers as intermediate facilities. ^ Section 6.3.X "Wireless Telecommunication Facility (WTF)" to reorganize WTF requirements and application procedures by type of facility (attached, collocation, and new transmission towers). ^ Section 6.3.V "Places of Worship" to remove a sign regulation that is redundant with Section 7.4.W "Signs for Permitted Non-Residential Uses in Residential or • Agricultural Districts". ^ Section 6.4.E "Portable Storage Structures" added to regulate the use, use duration, size, location, and additional requirements for portable storage structures. ^ Section 6.5.A "Particular Temporary Uses Permitted" to include farmers' markets as a temporary use permitted and the applicable regulations for the use. Article 7 General Development Standards ^ Section 7.1.D.3 "Features Allowed Within Required Yards" to clarify that structures that require building permits may be subject to additional regulations and to allow porches to extend into front and side street setbacks on a limited basis. ^ Section 7.2.C "Dimensions and Access" to clarify that drive aisle must meet a minimum setback from aright-of-way. • Section 7.2.G.1 "General" to clarify the procedure for requesting an alternative standard to off-street parking area surfacing. ^ Section 7.2.G."Surfacing" to reference the City of College Station Site Design Standards for requirements for off-street parking area surfaces and to consistently identify the Administrator as the person with the discretion to allow . for alternative drive surfaces and to specify surfacing requirements. • Section 7.2.H "Curbing Required" added to include references to the City of College Station Site Design Standards for curbing specifications and to identify when temporary curbing may be appropriate. ^ Section 7.2.I "Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Required" to change the minimum off-street parking requirement for Motor Vehicle Service Areas from one space per 100 sq.ft. to 1:200.* ^ Section 7.2.J "Drive-Through Facility Queuing Requirements" added to help minimize traffic circulation conflicts internal to sites. ^ Section 7.2.K.6.c "Bicycle Parking" to remove the provision of bicycle parking as an acceptable alternative parking plan since bicycle parking is required through Section 7.9.F "Pedestrian/Bike Circulation & Facilities". ^ Section 7.3.C.7 "Geometric Design of Driveway Access" to change acceptable curb return radii for residential from 2.5'-10' to 3'-10', and from 20'-30 to 25'-30' for non-residential; to identify the Administrator as the person whom may require a larger radii; to change the range for a residential driveway approach width from 10'-28' to 12'-25'; and to clarify that the widths for commercial and multi-family driveway approaches are measured at the property line. ^ Section 7.4 "Traffic Impact Analysis" moved from Section 7.9 "Non-Residential Architectural Standards" so its application will not be limited to non-residential developments. Include applicability standards for single family, duplex, and multi-family developments and the review of plans/preliminary plats for impact determination. ^ Section 7.5.D.2 "Prohibited Signs" to allow exceptions for on-premise signage that promotes community spirit, as determined by the City Council. ^ Section 7.5.F "Sign Standards" to include the requirements that a freestanding sign must be at least 10 feet behind aright-of-way line. ^ Section 7.5.Q "Non-Commercial and Political Signs" to limit the size and duration of display for anon-commercial sign. ^ Section 7.5.T "Special Event Signs" to clarify that signs, commercial banners, and balloons may be used for special events. ^ Section 7.5.X "Abandoned, Damaged, or Unsafe Signs" to require the removal of all associated signs and sign structures when a building is demolished. ^ Section 7.8.C "Minimum Requirements" changed to Section 7.8.C "Guidelines" to allow City staff more discretion with the standards for solid waste services. Also, to warn property owners that dumpster screening should be located outside of utility easements* and to clarify that special standards do not apply to small-lot single family but instead apply to townhouses and to provide guidelines for 300- gallon side loading automated containers. ^ Section 7.10 "Non-Residential Architectural Standards" to reorganize the section • into a format easier to understand-mainly identifying requirements by building/building plot size in a cumulative manner. • Section 7.10.A "Applicability" to clarify that the non-residential architectural standards apply to all non-residential development, redevelopment, and fagade changes. • Section 7.10.6 "Standards for Ail Non-Residential Structures": graphic added to summarize the requirements of the non-residential architectural standards, to define what fagades face aright-of-way, and to define what constitutes aright- of-way*. ^ Section 7.10.6.2 "Building Mass and Design" to remove requirements for front building facades and have them apply to all fagades facing aright-of-way. ^ Section 7.10.6.3 "Building Materials" to clarify that existing buildings may utilize non-conforming building materials for maintenance purposes, but any material change or replacement of more than 10% of the total area of all facades shall require material and color compliance; to establish a minimum percentage of surface area that must utilize a required building material; to clarify which concrete products are allowed; to restrict reflective glass on all fagades facing a public right-of-way; to add an exception to the reflective glass limitation*; and to add a restriction against unbuffered painted steel panel siding and galvanized steel use from residential areas. ^ Section 7.10.6.5 "Pedestrian/Bike Circulation & Facilities" to include a standard for how much area is needed for a bike rack and to only allow the racks to be anchored to the ground. • Section 7.10.6.6 "Parking Lots" to clarify that drive aisles are considered part of parking areas. ^ Section 7.10.D "Additional Standards for 20,000 S.F. or Greater" to set a minimum percentage of surface area that must utilize a required building material and to remove the requirement fora 30-inch band of specified material at the base of buildings*. ^ Section 7.10.E.1 "Building Mass and Design" to remove requirements for front building fagades and have them apply to all fagades facing aright-of-way for 50,000 sq.ft. or greater buildings/building plots. • Section 7.10.E.3 "Landscaping" to define minimum tree well requirements and to allow for unlimited substitutions of non-canopy trees for canopy trees against a building. ^ Section 7.10.E.4 "Pedestrian/Bike Circulation & Facilities" to set a standard of brick pavers or stamped dyed concrete for required walkways in parking lots for 50,000 sq.ft. or greater buildings/building plots. ^ Section 7.10.E "Additional Standards for 150,000 S.F. or Greater" to increase the minimum area for a plaza from 200 to 500 sq.ft., to clarify that the area of a plaza can not count towards parking lot island requirements, to remove the option of vegetation shading as a minimum component of a plaza, to set a minimum percentage of surface area that must utilize a required building • material, and to require parking areas to be screened by berms. • Section 7.10.G "Variances -Design Review Board" to increase the amount of an allowable variance from 75% to 100% of the total percentage of a standard. ^ Section 7.10.H "Submittal Requirements" added to define what information is needed from the developer at what time in the development process. ^ Section 7.11.6 "Specific Lighting Requirements" to remove site lighting restrictions that are redundant with Section 7.11.A "Site Lighting Design Requirements". ^ Section 7.11.6.3 "Temporary Outdoor Sales and Storage" to clarify that time limitations are per calendar year. Article 9 Nonconformities ^ Section 9.3.A "Enlargement, Alteration" to clarify at what level of site alteration an entire building plot in Northgate must come into compliance with the requirements of the UDO. Article 11 Definitions ^ Section 11.2 "Defined Terms" to redefine building plot*, clinic, Development Engineer, hospital or sanitarium, and commercial banner and to define drip molding, fagade, overflow parking, portable storage, quoin, restaurant -casual dining, restaurant -fine dining, roof types, sitwall, and stringcourse. • *Items changed after the December 14, 2005 Joint City Council/P&Z Workshop. •