Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12/05/2006 - Special Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission
Annexation Area 1 v illi 1 f . TECNNOLW� LOOP � o Ys�� `1 HI 8 N 4 o L N a 4 �2 m C d r - ! , `A i .,,,, 4 ii _ Ir 44 s \ . :404 A*400 \f''' .�\\��������\�� \sts\ssssss, O r, z _ . —, SMALL AERA MAPS OF IDENTIFIED AREAS Annexation Area 2 FilaiSTIMIlirW • lifff t.....:. .14,F v ,,,4,,, N i v e. .4* " ' ,--• P .4*, .* ,ri t 4,4 v t• 4.44/ 1 :* *.t1, • -Y., 1 :<.$ , f. * \ . _ , 4 t .N ' "P 4s,Npf i • p,.....t %.„.k. *N/4 */#.....- \ ' ' kA4, * 2 " ',. 1 At v ira v ‚ � 1 � 1 I i lMr ■ 4k-- l' t‘ , Z OS \ .\ J „ i o d e ti / • r 4 i ♦ • • v-Z .. tl Annexation Area 3 '0:1:7\7 ior # ••,•• 4, tt,e, 0,1 .y a: Att„,.. , sI e ,,..;. 4 // , -,,, , 0 ,--- :ITiv.::,..,:e.: ,;.:;,-,,,,.; ., .,. ■ ,,.,,,„ „„„, gkess:;41, „s,z:zsl!;szt.‘ o'cl ,',"': ,:',,,„"'' / ttttt t t t tt laratt ‘,:te,•• t ‘,,:03. llllllllllllllllllllllllll A /1/3,/ ■::44:','. 4; ,,‘„ ii, oil el. Ltd MI 01311,::-..:'04.'4.0.1s.,:':A \ ...,:;%.*,,:,". 6, & ffilk,.1111.•11111 1:':' .............................. Ava. 40 0 4 0 ,- ;`‘' , •;. , AN \ 4.•"#•ts.k#S,411, #4e* .'lls:1::$ 6' -.- VP"Iiii— la 4■ 47,44111k Its s ; V : .; ;•f :' ,1■1111 1 = '.'• N i_o ms , _ow" .."01,\.t::".:74:•:.',.. sZ1V: i:b ( 11 - 11. -re . v li‘‘PI ";* '• • • A.A • ' ,... ove•:`', , + k i „O ° :Vi..•#4,,,:#4 #1,ke" %,4 . ,:' 7' co / Ts - e ‘5 ..4 tl." v A•...•*•0*•:•.***•:'\ , e's* , :ttitg `'.•:', '''' :.'SO •./ 4 . 4 7,0# 4 * 41 :4•1..• \ ,■. 4, < ,c1,- lia'c-. 0* 0 \ A ,`"*. 4 "441.4,0% i f s ,...::,-, ; ,'4';' ,4r • c> A t A . 2:ia ra i ., li 0,,, , , 4p ■ • 1p , • • +,*, , n. tv. ,,,Ze , v s. • , , N„ .•;0*** ' ° . " •••• V," 7 mir . 0,11,_ - 4 kils 4iii _ i„,, . 41114.• O. • 4 q ,-;•.,- • N / vs...s. s. 0 :„:,.. . 4 $ `. • 4•1:•`Atfo 4e4 ,-.V l'it'',IV# Obs„ :" , ;kik, ;=ss';:f`rfel4",.•?rt;t:,\ .,/ ;40. *4 0A- ,; .t..:....,...,$4,,;-:-,,,,*.N.::: . .,s,z:) ...,,:..,...,,,,, „ss..02,./.......,,,, .- ,ik\ \,,,, •, ,,..:„.......4„,,,I.v.,,,...... • 48 f . 6V Vii A Iffif ii, t . k c !,,..6 , , •,!.`t* 0,6, .41, 01',■■‘,',4‘ \)i‘■■ \ *111 '' '.!$:. , Vd\i■ i■•Vk. ■ 0 * -- 8 o p 4 1 iir- NI .-* 4 011‘ Iv4r7 / *„. . 4 • - . ) 13. /. , A, A „AtAwattAtex,.. ‘v.%1Att`\=,,IVA ■;) ce,i11 ,1 A, 0 , 11 ./ A \s)..--.10c \lost •teo ,,, • 1,4 1V 4 A‘ ,44 ‘ 4, 1%,i0 li ,;-.. W 001,1-101111:11‘\\\*1 \t\A‘\sto,i'it''': \se174.4*.•‘‘..4' 4 i \ ., 4„8, ■■.** .4 , - ! i S*, 1*.0,•,... ';-7 iiU.W N ...#; ■: ** *At:: 4.- 0 1 4 4•••• *4 ,teontlie* ■. 'NV' MI6 1 'A ' , /* db ■iyi>4# 4 ., *AtA,00010‘ V.'f' . ATir Nr,,7 -4 1. .., A • A i , 4, • 11* • ..... . ,.*\ • -*****= k4kt 8 4 *4 „,t..\ 4 1 l /4 4 * '4,.• 4” .1 V ■t e. 4 #f .,...„ ■ fAiiii v z2 ' . • • Alltr „, ..... .....,t.............. A .-Ate_ Annexation Area 4 ,-- „ A „ wit I gotimweamilmtwip z wiwriP--- - - ,.- ArAlo•ip lis NI vz l eva9.11,-1-- w . tik ,„...., _ • *t 1 1 311 t \ 47 o ( 7 NM IMO NI .- � r3 I111II1\�1! r ,,,, 43,4,, At a, 1\ \„.t „v 114: lot wlf , li � �: �.. ��/ \gyp. � ► �'�' I/+ ` `-/ 1 1 dI . I �i •ii ,'i G • ,, 4 .. •,�$ .. o. /.. . i �c -,,,,,,,,._,,,,r % . I: ,-.f,:,,,,•,-; idr ,. .4 4 ' '44,111-pirtk . Arf9rtOett ---------- \* 4, fr i _ , ,.. sizt. .._ , • , � �• / � "kt, 4 4'4 ' \N 4 � �� a v � �� ■ ,• J O itt-,t, I risk 0 ...e. . , I 1111 1 6 )gaWc5/4. Mili i vv‘lp -1-1^'''''immrwm'Crili\ ”:111 . mom um `' A. A if< ,. , Q kifittutoo lipr iPw_ __ Z caec J tak o r AtIt..■ lird` iA,A AGENDA (*Or" Special Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission OF COLLEGE STATION Tuesday, December 5, 2006, at 12 Noon Planning c4' Derxlopmrnt Services Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion regarding a recommendation to City Council on areas identified for annexation. 3. Adjourn. Notice is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the College Station Planning and Zoning Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on the Tuesday, December 5, 2006, at Noon at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the day of November, 2006, at CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By • Connie Hooks, City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website, www.cstx.eov The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on November _, 2006, at and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: by Dated this day of , 2006. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of , 2006. Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764 -3517 or (TDD) 1- 800 - 735 -2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.eov Council meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. FILE COPY • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING &, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM Report Date: November 29, 2006 Meeting Date: December 5, 2006 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Lance Simms, Acting Director of Planning & Development Services lsimms @cstx.gov • Subject: Annexation of Exempt Areas (06- 00500260) Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a recommendation to City Council on areas identified for annexation. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends a positive recommendation to the City Council. Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a recommendation to the City council concerning areas identified for annexation under the exempt status. A city may consider annexation for many reasons, including securing tax base, providing for utility planning, ensuring good land use and thoroughfare planning, providing for safe building construction as well as providing room for orderly growth. As areas on the periphery of a city begin to develop and use city services it is also important to consider bringing them into the city limits. Historically annexation has been a very important factor in sustaining the population growth of Texas cities. Annexation is a growth strategy and has been a critical one for Texas cities in the past. Recent legislative changes have made annexation more difficult and there are many considerations in using this strategy in any community. There are four areas totaling 3,411 acres being considered for possible annexation under the exempt status at this time. A 3 -year annexation plan will be developed and presented to the City Council in 2007. Area #1 is generally located at the intersection of Raymond Stotzer Parkway and Turkey Creek Road. This area contains 102 acres. Land uses consist of approximately 6 residential units and a • Home of Texas A &M University recently constructed church. There are also 2 telecommunication towers located within this area. • The area has approximately 1 mile of public roadway. Area #2 is generally located at the intersection of SH 30 and William D. Fitch Parkway. This area contains 1,756 acres and has 5 residential units consisting of single - family and mobile home units. There are 0 miles of public roadway in this area. Area #3 is generally located at the intersection of Rock Prairie Road West and Jones - Butler Road. This area contains 1,101 acres. There are over 600 residential units located in this area, the majority of which are manufactured homes. There are approximately 4.2 miles of public roadway in this area. Area #4 is a 452 acre area located south of Greens Prairie Road West and bisected by Greens Prairie Trail. There are 13 residential units in this area and approximately 2.5 miles of public roadway. Item Background: Chapter 43 of the Local Government Code requires cities to prepare, adopt and maintain an Annexation Plan. Areas included in the plan can be annexed on the third anniversary of the adoption or amendment of the plan to that same property. In this context, the plan serves to provide a three -year notice to property owners of a city's intent to annex their property. The statute also provides several exceptions to the requirement to include land in an annexation plan. Two of these are applicable to College Station, as follows: 1. Areas that contain fewer than 100 tracts on which one or more residential dwellings are located on each tract. 2. Areas where more than 50 percent of the real property owners have petitioned for annexation. The City's statutorily mandated annexation plan provides that the City has no plans for annexation, • such that the only areas that may be considered for annexation are those areas that are exempt from the annexation requirements of Chapter 43. Significant development (residential and commercial) is occurring in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Regulatory controls, including but not limited to zoning, non - residential architectural standards, and fire code and building codes should be considered in some areas that are referred to as gateways in and out of College Station and that are experiencing significant development pressure. Recently, College Station Utilities (CSU) has taken measures toward wastewater treatment by applying to extend the City's sewer certificated area (CCN) into most of the existing ETJ. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The City is currently in the process of updating its Comprehensive Plan and will work with the consultant during Phase 2 of the process which will include the four identified areas. Attachments: 1. Annexation Cost Considerations 2. Recent Annexation History 3. ETJ Development Trends 4. Current Annexation Plan 5. Map of Current ETJ 6. Proposed Annexation Map 7. Aerial Maps of Identified Areas 8. Small Area Maps of Identified Areas r� L Home of Texas A &M University A,nnesat�ion t co ns�iderat�ions 0 Annexation Cost Considerations • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning & Development Services Summary Report 30 November 2006 0 U Table of Contents Page AreaDescriptions ................................................................................... ..............................1 Reasons to Consider Annexation ........................................................... ..............................2 Immediate Impacts PoliceServices ........................................................................... ..............................3 Fire Services (Including EMS, Code Enforcement and Fire Prevention) ...................................................... ..............................3 SolidWaste Collection .............................................................. ..............................4 PublicWorks .............................................................................. ..............................5 Building Permits and Inspections .............................................. ..............................5 Proposed Capital Improvements ........................................................... ..............................6 • Fiscal Impact Analysis .......................................................................... .............................11 Conclusions........................................................................................... .............................12 Summary by Annexation Area .............................................................. .............................13 RevenueSummary ................................................................................ .............................14 Appendix A — Service Standard Collection of Annual Public Costs AllAreas ................................................................................... .............................15 Area1 ........................................................................................ .............................16 Area2 ........................................................................................ .............................17 Area3 ........................................................................................ .............................18 Area4 ........................................................................................ .............................19 • Annexation Cost Considerations Summary Report There are many reasons a city considers annexation. These include securing tax base, providing for utility planning, ensuring good land use and thoroughfare planning, providing for safe building construction as well as providing room for future population growth. As areas on the periphery of a city begin to develop and use city services it is also important to consider bringing them into the city limits. Historically annexation has been a very important factor in sustaining the population growth of Texas cities. Annexation is a growth strategy and has been a critical one for Texas cities in the past. Recent legislative changes have made annexation more difficult and there are many considerations in using this strategy in any community. A part of any annexation consideration must include the capital expenditures that are anticipated, the ultimate costs and revenues anticipated at build -out (the fiscal impact analysis), and the immediate impacts on city services the "day after" annexation. This report is intended to present all of these cost considerations. There are four areas being considered for possible annexation under the exempt status at this time. Area Descriptions Area #1 is generally located at the intersection of Raymond Stotzer Parkway and Turkey Creek Road. This area contains 102 acres. Land uses consist of approximately six residential units and a recently constructed church. There are also two telecommunication towers located within this area. The area has approximately one mile of public roadway. Area #2 is generally located at the intersection of SH 30 and William D. Fitch Parkway. This area contains 1,756 acres and has five residential units. There are zero miles of public roadway in this area. Area #3 is generally located at the intersection of Rock Prairie Road West and Jones- Butler Road. This area contains 1,101 acres. There are over 600 residential units located in this area, the majority of which are manufactured homes. There are approximately 4.2 miles of public roadway in this area. Area #4 is a 452 -acre area located south of Greens Prairie Road West and bisected by Greens Prairie Trail. There are 13 residential units in this area and approximately 2.5 miles of public roadway. • t Annexation Considerations In order to provide for a stable tax base, provide for wastewater planning, ensure good land use and thoroughfare planning, provide safe building construction, and secure room for future population growth, all areas should be considered for annexation. Additionally, Area #1 is virtually surrounded by the City, effectively creating a doughnut effect. Property for the new City cemetery is also located within Area #1. Area #2 will ensure that the City is able to control the SH 30 corridor as the majority of the SH 30 frontage within this area is undeveloped. Securing the property in Area #2 also enables land use and thoroughfare planning ahead of development. Areas #3 and #4 are being recommended for annexation in response to development pressure. The city is aware of proposed residential development in each of these areas. The development planned for these areas are higher in density than we have witnessed in the past and staff is concerned about the lack of building permit authority in the ETJ. Annexing these areas now will enable the City to issue building permits and perform safety inspections as construction progresses. The Brushy Special Utility District has the service territory for a portion of Annexation Area #1. However, the City of College Station Water CCN covers the majority of this area. Water for Area #2 is served by Wickson Creek Special Utility District. Areas #3 and #4 are totally within the Wellborn Special Utility District's service area. Electrical power for all areas identified for annexation is provide by Bryan Texas Utilities (BTU). Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code allows Cities to annex up to ten percent of its size in any given year. This amount is allowed to be accrued and can accumulate for up to three years. Since College Station has not annexed in the past three years, the City may annex up to 30 percent of the current size. This enables the City to annex approximately 9,081 acres. The total acreage under consideration is 3,411 — approximately 37% of the area available for annexation under State law. E 2 0 Immediate Impacts Upon Annexation The first cost consideration involves those services that must be provided immediately upon annexation. These include police services, fire services, emergency medical services, code enforcement, solid waste collection, public R.O.W. maintenance, utility maintenance (as applicable) and building permitting and inspections. The Departments responsible for these services have provided information to assess the potential impact of annexing the areas under consideration. The following is a summary of the initial impact by Department. Police Services The areas proposed for annexation should not have an adverse impact on the Police Department's ability to provide services. The land uses as proposed, do not create a need for more officers at this time. There is a possibility that beats will have to be restructured to adequately distribute any additional workload. The Police Department will monitor and address issues as the areas proposed for annexation are built out and a larger demand for emergency services is necessary. Fire Services Annexation of all areas will have a significant impact on the Fire Department's service levels. As with any potential annexation there will be impacts on the Fire Department's • ability to deliver services within designated drive times. As a result of these annexation processes there will also be a significant need to add additional resources to the fire department to meet the service demands. It is projected that a new Fire Station that houses staffing for one Fire Engine and one Ambulance will need to be built on the East end of William D. Fitch Parkway near the SH 30 intersection and a new Fire Station that houses staffing for one Fire Engine and one Ambulance will need to be built on the West end of Greens Prairie near the Royder Drive intersection. The purchase of a minimum of a 2,500 gallon water tanker and a grass firefighting truck will also need to be purchased to protect the off -road and non fire hydrant areas. The College Station Fire Department will continue to work with the Brazos County Volunteer Fire Departments through existing mutual aid agreements to protect these response areas as growth occurs. It is important to note that the addition of these areas may negatively impact the City's next ISO evaluation. Following are comments for each of the proposed annexation areas for Fire Protection, Emergency Medical Services, and Code Enforcement Services. Area # 1 - Raymond Stotzer Pkwy • The water supply (fire hydrants and fire flow) in this area is not adequate to support new development. • The City will need to purchase a grass firefighting truck to fight off -road fires in this area. • Brazos County Volunteer Fire Department Precinct 4 currently serves this area. 3 • Area #2 - SH 30 & William D. Fitch Parkway • The water supply (fire hydrants and fire flow) in this area is not adequate to support new development. The City will also need to purchase a water tanker truck (minimum 2,500 gallons capacity) to provide water supply for off -road firefighting. • The City will need to purchase a grass firefighting truck to fight off -road fires in this area. • Response Times — this area is beyond the standard 5- minute response time, therefore the City of College Station will need to purchase or acquire a two (2) acre tract of land to build a future fire station. • Fire Code Compliance — there are already structures that have been built in this area that do not meet our fire protection code. These buildings and structures present fire and life safety concerns for the future. • Brazos County Volunteer Fire Department Precinct 2 currently serves this area. Area #3 - Greens Prairie & Royder Dr. • The water supply (fire hydrants and fire flow) in this area is not adequate to support new development. • Response Times — this area is beyond the standard 5- minute response time, therefore the City will need to purchase or acquire a two (2) acre tract of land to build a future fire station. • Code Enforcement — this area contains a number of properties and structures that do not meet present code enforcement requirements. • South Brazos County Volunteer Fire Department Precinct 1 currently serves this area. Area #4 - Rock Prairie & Jones Butler • The water supply (fire hydrants and fire flow) in this area is not adequate to support new development. • This area is just on the edge of the standard 5- minute response time - the relocation of Fire Station #3 should greatly improve the response times to this area. • The City will need to purchase a grass firefighting truck to fight off- road fires in this area. • South Brazos County Volunteer Fire Department Precinct 1 currently serves this area. As the City prepares for this annexation and future annexation opportunities, a decision needs to be made concerning water supply as it relates to fire flow and fire hydrant distance requirements as our city grows into areas that are served by other water service providers (such as Brushy and Wellborn water district). There is a major concern that these water service providers will not be able to supply adequate demands for fire protection requirements. 4 Solid Waste Collection Most of the exempt annexation proposal areas can be absorbed by the Sanitation Division without additional personnel or collection equipment. The more densely populated areas of the proposed annexation are the three mobile home parks off of Rock Prairie Road, west of FM2154, which are Oak Creek, Rolling Ridge, and Sunset Ridge. These areas will require an initial cost outlay for additional residential containers. Total costs for the proposed annexation are $27,000 for additional containers and $40,000 recurring O &M collection costs which would be offset by a sanitation fee revenue increase from the additional customers. Currently, these areas are being serviced by several different private waste service providers. Per state law, existing contracted services may continue to be provided by the company for a period of two years after the effective annexation date. The necessity for these private service providers to apply for a waste collection franchise with the City to continue service after annexation is an issue that needs to be addressed. Public Works - Road mowing and maintenance Annual maintenance costs are approximately $7,500 per mile annually. The total annual costs are estimated to be $57,900. i Building Permits and Inspections Individually, the areas under consideration should not have an adverse impact on current service levels. Collectively, there will be a slight to moderate impact on current performance levels depending on the rate of development. Once the annexed areas begin to develop, service levels may have to be adjusted to reflect the additional workload unless personnel are added. • E • Proposed Capital Improvements In determining how utility service would be extended to the areas proposed for annexation, the current Utility Extension Policy was applied. The current policy for extension of utility service calls for the extension of water and wastewater main lines across major thoroughfares and natural boundaries that would be cost prohibitive for private entities. The City also provides major facilities, such as lift stations and wastewater package plants when development warrants the installation of such facilities. As an area develops, developers or homeowners extend water distribution and wastewater collection lines to individual lots. The lot owners pay for the costs of these lines; however, the City may elect to fund additional capacity. The City's financing options include the use of utility revenues, bond funds, or impact fees. The extension of water and wastewater lines is driven by development due to cost and operational conditions. Until an area becomes densely populated, the cost of utility extension is not feasible to be borne by a few lot owners. Also, population density is required to prevent septic conditions from occurring in a wastewater line with low flow. Area # 1 Water College Station has served the area south of F &B and east of Turkey Creek Road for many years. In the 1950's the residents constructed a small diameter water line that was connected to the TAMU system and College Station maintains the meters and billing process. A 12" replacement line has been under design and will be under construction as soon as easements are obtained along F &B. The Brushy Water System CCN service territory is located along the west side of Turkey Creek Road. These residents are served by a 6" diameter domestic water line. The College Station Water CCN covers the majority of the area. Engineering and Water Services have been working for some time with their consultant, the City of Bryan, the Parks & Recreation Department and area residents to extend water and wastewater lines to this area. Current plans include an 8" line through the cemetery site and a 12 -in line crossing Turkey Creek which will extend west past SH 47. Area #1 Wastewater Properties within Annexation Area #1 are currently served by private on -site sewer facilities (OSSFs). However, for this area to develop more densely a gravity system or lift station is necessary. The Pornada Tract is served by a lift station which flows to a TAMU wastewater line for which a limited ILA has been approved. Current plans include a lift station to the west, a gravity line across Turkey Creek and lateral lines northward along Turkey Creek the drainage way. The City has entered into an ILA with the City of Bryan for a limited volume of wastewater to be treated by Bryan. Bryan is in • the process of constructing a new wastewater treatment plant to the west of Area # 1. 6 • • • Area 1 Water/ Wastewater Additional 12 -in Water Line Proposed �CAY U�ft Ewnq Ana t 1 12 -in Water Line currently under design �\ Future Sewer Area #2 Water Area #2 is in the water CCN service territory of Wickson Creek Special Utility District (WCSUD). Residents are either served by private well or by WCSUD. Due to the fact that the City does not serve water in this area, the City is not obligated to extend water infrastructure in the area after annexation. Area #2 Wastewater Area #2 is not currently served by an organized collection system. Any structure within the area would have to be served by an OSSF. OSSFs can serve developments but require large acreages for treatment. This, combined with stormwater detention requirements, make OSSF a last choice. The City is currently designing a lift station along William D. Fitch Parkway. at Carter's Creek to serve previously annexed areas. The lift station can be upgraded to serve the additional areas north and south of Fitch Parkway along SH 30. The gravity line planned in conjunction with the lift station will only extend eastward to about 1.5 miles west of SH 30. Therefore, an additional lift station will be required to serve the area. 7 Pr r L-.A Area 2 -','- Wastewater • ko I Ir ETJ ba ^ .1Y � _ _Current Proposed 4 Y: 3 Lift Station N Additional Lift \ik\ Pravv , i i Additional Force Main Ar \ 0 _ _Current Proposed 4 Y: 3 Lift Station Area #3 Water The majority of Area #3 is in the water CCN service territory of Wellborn Special Utility District (WSUD). Residents are served by private well or by WCSUD. The Rolling Ridge property is in the City's CCN and served by a private water line extension. If the Rolling Ridge area is annexed, the City may need to extend a sizeable line to the area to ensure fire supply. The City has been planning on an extension to this area. This line could provide water supply for fire protection purposes. Area #3 Wastewater Area #3 has recently seen new development in which City wastewater facilities have been installed. A 12" sewer trunk line was installed parallel to Cain Road through the Las Palomas Subdivision at the southwest end of Cain Road. The Great Oaks Subdivision is planning a lift station that will pump back to this line. This lift station may have additional capacity to serve areas in the Area #3 outside of Great Oaks. • Rolling Ridge operates its own private wastewater treatment plant. The plant is scheduled for upgrade to serve the new housing expansion. 8 Additional Lift \ik\ Pravv , ity i Additional Force Area #3 Water The majority of Area #3 is in the water CCN service territory of Wellborn Special Utility District (WSUD). Residents are served by private well or by WCSUD. The Rolling Ridge property is in the City's CCN and served by a private water line extension. If the Rolling Ridge area is annexed, the City may need to extend a sizeable line to the area to ensure fire supply. The City has been planning on an extension to this area. This line could provide water supply for fire protection purposes. Area #3 Wastewater Area #3 has recently seen new development in which City wastewater facilities have been installed. A 12" sewer trunk line was installed parallel to Cain Road through the Las Palomas Subdivision at the southwest end of Cain Road. The Great Oaks Subdivision is planning a lift station that will pump back to this line. This lift station may have additional capacity to serve areas in the Area #3 outside of Great Oaks. • Rolling Ridge operates its own private wastewater treatment plant. The plant is scheduled for upgrade to serve the new housing expansion. 8 Additional Lift r Station \ Y i Additional Force Main ' Gravity Line / X 0 0.15 0.3 oe Area #3 Water The majority of Area #3 is in the water CCN service territory of Wellborn Special Utility District (WSUD). Residents are served by private well or by WCSUD. The Rolling Ridge property is in the City's CCN and served by a private water line extension. If the Rolling Ridge area is annexed, the City may need to extend a sizeable line to the area to ensure fire supply. The City has been planning on an extension to this area. This line could provide water supply for fire protection purposes. Area #3 Wastewater Area #3 has recently seen new development in which City wastewater facilities have been installed. A 12" sewer trunk line was installed parallel to Cain Road through the Las Palomas Subdivision at the southwest end of Cain Road. The Great Oaks Subdivision is planning a lift station that will pump back to this line. This lift station may have additional capacity to serve areas in the Area #3 outside of Great Oaks. • Rolling Ridge operates its own private wastewater treatment plant. The plant is scheduled for upgrade to serve the new housing expansion. 8 The recently completed Steeplechase Sewer Line crosses Rock Prairie Road West approximately 0.67 miles east of I &GN and will serve a portion of Area #3. An additional lift station and force main sited along North Graham at Hopes Creek will be needed to serve the entire area. Area 3 Water/ Wastewater Additional Water Line Additional Force Main • • Area #4 Water Area #4 is located entirely within the water CCN service territory of Wellborn Special Utility District (WSUD). The WSUD water tower is located just off Greens Prairie Road and Royder Road to the northeast. WSUD operates and maintains 16" and larger diameter lines within the area. Area #4 Wastewater Area #4 is predominately undeveloped. Residents in Wellborn Oaks, being comprised of 4- acre lots, are on OSSF. The City is currently reviewing plans for a new proposed development in Area #4 which includes a lift station and force main. The proposed lift station would serve all of Area #4 except the extreme south portion. 9 ETJ i`. ` � "''"�"'" ' Additional Future\ = I.... Lift Station _ om 0 0.1 0.3 0.t Area #4 Water Area #4 is located entirely within the water CCN service territory of Wellborn Special Utility District (WSUD). The WSUD water tower is located just off Greens Prairie Road and Royder Road to the northeast. WSUD operates and maintains 16" and larger diameter lines within the area. Area #4 Wastewater Area #4 is predominately undeveloped. Residents in Wellborn Oaks, being comprised of 4- acre lots, are on OSSF. The City is currently reviewing plans for a new proposed development in Area #4 which includes a lift station and force main. The proposed lift station would serve all of Area #4 except the extreme south portion. 9 • • Area 4 Wastewater \`,"_mi • ( 1 ; _`�, =! \� }� oWM 10 \- p I 'i { t 'i - i - -. Ali ✓<.`` I \\ Current Proposed Lift Station � � T ' I • t \ i \`,"_mi • ( 1 ; _`�, =! \� }� oWM 10 • Fiscal Impact Analysis (Full Build -out Scenario) The fiscal impact analysis used here is a tool that estimates the annual costs and revenues that the City will incur once the identified property is fully developed. This information is provided to help project the need for municipal services, to monitor the costs of land use decisions, and to give officials information for making growth and planning decisions. For this analysis the widely accepted Service Standard Method was used'. This analysis should be treated as an estimate based upon the best data available. In addition, it is important for decision - makers using this information to understand the assumptions upon which it is based. 1. In this model it is assumed that the current level of municipal services in College Station will be maintained in newly annexed areas. 2. This analysis provides estimates for these areas once they are fully developed. Some of these areas may not develop for 20+ years. The costs / benefits in the interim will vary, but typically costs to the City are higher until the areas fully develop. 3. All costs and revenues are in current dollars based on current budget data. 4. The model is based on existing tax and utility rates that may change over time. Future changes to the land use plan may also change future fiscal impacts. Demands and Costs The analysis begins by using future land use assumptions, based on development in accordance with the City's adopted Land Use Plan, to estimate the population for each annexation area. Using existing development as a model, the average number of dwelling units for residential areas is calculated. Census data for persons per household are used to calculate the population. Existing service levels for the City are then used to calculate the demand for City services in the annexation areas. An equal level of service is applied to the annexation area to yield the demand for services. Costs per year for the demanded services are calculated using cost ratios to compensate for the varied nature of service provided by different departments. This results in a cost per year to provide existing level of services to the annexation areas. Revenues Revenues are calculated for property taxes, sales taxes, utility fees and miscellaneous revenues. Estimates are based on current revenues from the existing City applied to the projected development in the annexation areas. 1 - More information on this method is available in The Fiscal Impact Handbook by Robert Burchell & Davide Listokin. 11 • Conclusions The following tables summarize the results of the fiscal impact analysis. Area #1 and Area #2 have the greatest potential for positive revenues. Conversely, Area #3 and Area #4 have the highest overall cost. This model does not reflect the possibility of recovering some costs through impact fee lines. Overall the results show that there would be a net annual cost to the City of - $341,000 once these areas are fully developed. It should be noted that future changes in the Land Use Plan or development patterns will affect these projections • • 12 • Summary of Fiscal Impact Analysis by Area Area 1 Costs $497,300 Property Tax Revenues $83,600 Utility Revenues $1,434,900 Total $1,021,200 Area 2 Costs $4,483,100 Property Tax Revenues $2,374,600 Utility Revenues $2,386,900 Total $278,400 Costs $2,786,000 Area 3 $596,700 Costs $3,179,100 Property Tax Revenues $643,100 Utility Revenues $1,632,100 Total - $903,900 Area 4 Costs $2,786,000 Property Tax Revenues $596,700 Utility Revenues $1,452,300 Total - $737,000 • 13 Summary of Revenues — Build -out Property Tax Revenue — Area 1 $83,600 Property Tax Revenue — Area 2 $2,374,600 Property Tax Revenue — Area 3 $643,100 Property Tax Revenue — Area 4 $596,700 Total Property Tax Revenues $3,698,000 Utility Revenues — Area 1 $1,434,900 Utility Revenues — Area 2 $2,386,900 Utility Revenues — Area 3 $1,632,100 Utility Revenues — Area 4 $1,452,300 Total Utility Revenues $6,906,200 Total Revenues $10,604,200 Total Costs $10,945,500 Total Annual Fiscal Impact - $341,300 Note: Potential miscellaneous revenues (not included in the above) constitute a one time positive impact of $3,529,000. • 14 ' 'I cn 10) ) (D O CO N OD OI '.h N;f- O M O n — ti N h't CO to M' mot'• N• O 0 M O Cf> M d,F � O� N M M M d d'IN Fl- MV � t- Nd' O) N - -7.-- r O r 0 4H SA � � v 00 r- v fl- O M (O CO O tO O N N N r- C M O CO O M N M N 00 U') M O N • U EA FA L LL CO r; h O r N r CO O 0 d'N(DN CM 00 E 00,0�OM0 d'ON 0,000r-•• N 00 Q to Y O LOOM,OI-MOwCO1 0) M CO; CO iCM It 00 O N N OA 00 N:V'V,0 V r— 0 0 M v U M CA : V f- N OA O M O 1` O LO O:n M r- N N 00'(14 O st C (D N CO U h N - O :3 'p a 4) N a r w to N C (� ER O 7 U N C ti 04 0r- -0) 0) 1- V OA m CO y O LO 00 CO N OA �- O CO r m O CO!N�NLtOCOv0�C0 C C 3 d E y c 0. O 3 —° m c 4) :3 a Q Q o io °ern ° —V 0� CL C ~' X M Lq Cli L ' � M O . CO tO 1` r O y l6 CO O'M.ONN 00000 cm Q �'OrO� -O MO(O t0 V j W d pQ � CO X d c c = N IL C V N.Nil� 0,00 O N O) CM r- c 8 c Q Q 0)t--.— CO0) rCON 80) 00 N C d V NCn,N— +�N000O V N co d 7 r M Ili ,�CA� COOM- - Ld CO ,N,O'MN.CM000OCnv v N N 4 M CV MMCONN— ON Oc E O MCO.NMV V LO V NO 0) ZU C O co c EA EA CD C v U J N C/) c d Cl) 0 co co OA CO CO CO 1� 2 = y N rn U CO OA OA M L M M lo: m N O N N 00000— E� N w C @ N C C O LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO c C O C j ON N E a I 0'�• CL)�,0000M r- U C> CO, It IT Cl) CMNN O> E (D LL s U c 0) N_N E2 � Q` C (n E to C LL•, 2 `•' N i; C (? N N N p� dl •� O "O N O O C N d fm d l0 m 7 w N 7 f0 � c c� ° u 3 Cp w Cp a� N: N' O .` N m 0 f0 C C C C c . O 0 co E CD m m m c a N O O a 3 3 CD CA p m O O 19 r- CL a) c O H U` W Z 1: N M li kn I'D O;�,to LC) 0) to CO C r `N:O .I CO r CO:N'f�N.M d'0 O 0 N to N O 0 00 O'I� CO�I-T 'MM 0) ■ 64 � C W (fl. 41* (O: .rO� Me - (O ',N M r LO C �.N t O LO ' O'�,IT (O N O M 0:0.0:0,MO (O ON . 0 to 00 00 LO V) to I N M M - CO d' Iq M 0;000 000 to M N r 0) I'D ■ 64 64 C W (O: .rO� Me - (O ',N O'�,IT (O N O M 0:0.0:0,MO (O ON N 0;000 000 = • U W LL C_ Il- LO r- 0 0 0 w v M 00 E (Oto.r r-N04 00 O!M r.to:M M 0 W 00 Q ail M�M(Od'OMr �,.iZ'to'NNMN —d' O O U y ii fA (A 7 o to;(O LO r'v.(o o� a D U N;O O,(O N'N N I oo000.00000 an ui O (� 7 3 CL cn y c m 3 N -V•N O N N V 00 V E mn c0 O� O 0:� O M;tOMto1_;O� — CO_ (O r d 0 •� Cw 0 O tt)I- tnO N(V v000AO 1 :0) fl- 00 0 V MCDCD N >� C1 Y C N m r 0> 0 CL C m � C Oa N'N 0'CO,ONO V'M 'COO_LON(OO I- tlj y Q v 0:r N : 0) '�iN to.to,v OO co OTC c O V 0) t- O r '(0'00'00 to N'COMN,CM;COt0 L6 IT tp M NM M(O;NN --ON W Co • c N A MWNM V V OI gN w a � w (O E (6 U O y Z U c v M;M(OM O to (O LO, 0) 0 M 'V,t0, M M I C (� O0000 c M in N O _ N •p N C c M O LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 U) C a C L ON, to 000 LO 0 Lo (D v (o (d (o 0 of 6 N (0 �TT0 MN04 M N c N C6 Cn E N N O i> N c Z > o m c (6 ai c' d LL N. N E rn N ay Ev•r. 0 � N �. >. N C� 0 0 O c y ` O CL q 0 0 � C Y• ` w ` m 3 d f > OL N; W (0 (Up a N 0 w N (O > LL C9 '0_ LL (j) co > d C c C C N N ° C c i6 E� - 0 U Ea. C ?c 0 N > a •3 O N f6 CO N C a > . 0 0 CL M M 0 U N y C6 N V m N - o o c y N .� C-) U_ H 0 (D W Z - Ncn I'D 0 • 1 , 1 u VZ N O V a m 7 C C Q C +7 C N O e A C Q m V m 'O C a CO) d Z d O , — M (O I- M —0) , CT CIL ct V M N (O I- C 0) a!CV) '(O CO CO :N'N:IV — OO O 0 0, n'Lf)(OItN Lo 00;in (n Go — tom ' ' m —•M .M N M CO co 0 � . 0 r,-L , CS! cq N LQ — i( CC) 0 N M — Cn et M M N �- 0) e - .- 00 : CO v N CO N a co 0;0 0 0 Cl) O 0 O N O O:: .-- i O O O ci O joo" —OLQ (O`7 M Ln.M Lo O CO O �0)',oi (ON(V CV (6 t�: O,N N O (o O'nM:O 000 r r =r'��C O M w (O 00 'N1,00MNCM(O to l N:(M CM0 NN O 1 d 1 di Cq (A -' --f Cn N r r 00. (O co 0 Lo V Lo b 'Cn 0 co v,U) v M � �aaa a O'.Loi00000 00 O1NIU a a a Lo in to 0 co 'WO v Iq M N N 1 't S INt '14::-- 00 - N M :NICO:46 00 CO to :— l0>NLoMO — ;M000nNNN C joo" —OLQ (O`7 M Ln.M Lo O CO O �0)',oi (ON(V CV (6 t�: O,N N O (o O'nM:O 000 r r =r'��C O M w (O 00 'N1,00MNCM(O to l N:(M CM0 NN O 1 d 1 di Cq (A -' --f Cn N r r 00. (O co 0 Lo V Lo b 'Cn 0 co v,U) v M � �aaa a O'.Loi00000 00 O1NIU a a a Lo in to 0 co 'WO v Iq M N N M M r C7 co I M M r 0) 00 r- 69 M M to to C7 6s le V. M 00 to Cl) t L 0 Lo N 0 C O a� m 0 U w 0 C N U m LL C E a Q '1 > O U_ 3 CL w a a O U � C c o y c E A O > a m c m ui C O • C C _N• a j E •� U (n c c m O •� f0 C Sa C � C C C > c m � N 0) c L� N N (D a m 7 C C W c c E Ea > o C7 d � c c '- tr C7 w a a 7 N m 3 C O 7 O. O O. CA c . C N w 0 O m y c y y R N N N w :3 C l0 c •Z C, m a� � � 3 ° `o LL _ 8 P •c E w N O Cp N a O (D C O > > U U 2 CL 0 C C (D O O N f6 C a0 = 0 0.•3 o a� �U 0ULL H Ze- NM t` V N E' yi is to m C N; •N Z 3 ° C ca O co yl O O. .. N m +r m LL: a LL co co co 5 a O 0 c N O ( a O o CD �a M M r C7 co I M M r 0) 00 r- 69 M M to to C7 6s le V. M 00 to Cl) t L 0 Lo N 0 C O a� m 0 U w 0 C N U m LL C E a Q '1 > O U_ 3 CL w a a O U � C c o y c E A O > a m c m ui C O • C C _N• a j E •� U (n c c m O •� f0 C Sa C � C C C > c m � N 0) c L� N N (D a m 7 C C W c c E Ea > o C7 d � c c '- tr C7 w a a 7 N m 3 C O 7 O. O O. CA c . C N w 0 O m y c y y R N N N w :3 C l0 c •Z C, m a� � � 3 ° `o LL _ 8 P •c E w N O Cp N a O (D C O > > U U 2 CL 0 C C (D O O N f6 C a0 = 0 0.•3 o a� �U 0ULL H Ze- NM t` • 0.� 011t 00 CA M CO j N Cp CO CO,O 8M38M O - S ",- ,tO M,V N 03 M.COMC):C) ' CA S, —;A, h. N �: ' LO CA 1l- CO h c0 ' OM O N N r M 40W �M� t--, CM O O N N �.N ' O O LO C C d9 Ef! y N.C O � N O'OOOMO COON V 0 0 m LL C E °co u�i u U Q 0' —` (D co O', O O' CA CO � OO CO C-4 0) O 0) 1� r O y N(6, C N:�ODO — N C M? O r ; d Cv) N M co p > N > U_ 7 O V CC)MCOMMM OD 04 OI O N N h (O U) CO CO 00 'IT r CO CO IT r .- r r CA 1- Iq W) 40' Z C a m 3 E o c C OiCA'O O� �' O O Q o a Q to r— M Cn M CO f- O M In I > (D O O 0 CnI- LOO NN CA I 00 - 0) 0)�p CO CO N> O o 8. M 0. . K O N C c c 1� Q c - ((�� (pp pp L MM pplOpp � uiw c Q v N O),N N IT N M N 0 � ) j , CO 00 LO C C 'p 0 MNMMC ON 0rlp M (O C4 O d Ld N co LO co u) E V Z U c m N d M 00 co 00 CA LO IT LO: O. (A M. IT LO LO � M v N •p C y N t Q � (A � C O N y O LO' O O O O O O O LO C a S U O",Woo0Cn , C O O 00 N � co � � co N � � N N E CO 0 N N (00 3 o m m ° o C7 U- c ccg (D (D cc O> E c y c C7) N y0 @ CA N, 06 O ca C p S U _,a� 3 c o a ° ii'iic ° n'0) m — UJ �p p U S A Z) 0- o � �' CO E Y O 8 U � a C O� C o o_' ° r �a (� 0 n 0 0 o � (D t/1 (D o a 3 rn LL F H 0 W Z N ci 00 0 0 E � k a � 2 wcV )k� 25« «J V k § . � $ §�2: /$7q - 1 f.§ /�A�C *4 �/ m (D§2 @§ §� ©1 k� - / % &— _ /q...q§ 0000 -- 000 won — o RSl ( S$f ��,m.n. %oo \ k���k ƒ $� k _ §rl 9(P SR �w'w���� w� k7 kj /k7I/ pkF t %$ tƒ 04 r- 0) N o 0 -&Lf) 04 \�kq - \k /k w (D /0) ¥¥LO 04 00 e $$ ggqq.q§ o - - — 000 0- 8828§82 BB $ q 0 C04 § r r § co 12 k F eo 4 § _ m \C$ ƒ0a ƒm /k\kƒ S \§ 0) § —% F d[ % /a to ■ � _ 2 $ _ k \ to § C4 k k 2 m § co � m � 0 { 2 � ƒ % E J 7 \ v � 2 a. k u o ' S &Q - f @ - 2 t § k _�§ k §) f § @ 9 � . k� k k0 \. kk �� § a� 2k Ef $§ fa �§ © k &§ U LD % §f i 887 Cl § Etf k 0 B W E � ° 2 k\ �kk E� %g o f 03 O� CL >1 f§a C$ �w �v2J zrww & Re cent Ann xation Wistory CITY OF COLLEGE STATION . RECENT ANNEXATION HISTORY 1994 • No annexation policy • Annexation plan driven by electric CCNs— utility service (electric and service basins for 2 WWTPs) became the policy 1995 and 1996 • 1994 annexation plan completed • Approximately 5225 acres annexed Dec. 9, 1999 • Annexation plan— exempt and petitions April 12, 2001 • Annexation feasibility study presented to Council (part of Council Strategic Plan) • Council gave direction to move ahead with Priority 1 areas (exempt areas — general) May 23, 2002 • Updated Council on areas to be considered (broken down into specific areas), annexation process, and schedule for annexation June 27, 2002 • Presentation of Fiscal Impact Analysis of each specific area • ➢ impacts that result from services that must be provided immediately upon annexation ➢ cost of capital improvements that are required under statute ➢ costs and revenues that will occur once the areas are completely built out July 11, 2002 • Council directed staff to begin the preparation of a service plan and adopted an ordinance to begin annexation proceedings for the certain properties, setting public hearing dates and establishing a date to consider an ordinance for the annexation Sept. 26, 2002 • Public hearing Oct. 2, 2002 • Public hearing Oct. 10, 2002 • Council directed Staff which areas to include in the annexation ordinance Oct. 24, 2002 • 2002 annexation complete March 13, 2003 • Utility extension policy formalized as part of the on -going annexation strategy • November 23, 2004 • Annexation petition in F &B area granted (6.843 acres) • Feb. 9, 2006 • Change in ETJ utility extension policy — previously land owners that wanted city utilities had to request annexation (exceptions could be granted). Generally, the time and cost involved in permitting private sewage facilities, developing them, and providing continuous maintenance for dense ETJ developments are prohibitive. With sewer CCNs, the City is able to provide public services that will allow for denser development with waste water facilities to city standards. The only way to ensure that the quality of development that can occur with this service is to all city standards (infrastructure construction, fire code, building code, park provision, etc.) is to annex. As the City is responsible for planning and development of these utilities, and as we do not have land use controls in the county, it lends to a more aggressive annexation policy to bring these properties in and control the land use ( "therein established an annexation policy and program to incorporate affected areas in a manner that sufficiently addresses planning and development issues for the extended utility systems "). June 22, 2006 • Council stated that they wanted to pursue annexation through exempt areas and through a 3 -year plan. • Focus on high density development areas • Prioritize areas for Council • Provide Fiscal Impact Analysis • Back with proposal in 3 -4 months • ETJ DEVELOPMENT TRENDS Annexation Policy Review Development Trends in the Extra - territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) Population Estimates & Projections Since the last Census in 2000, the rate of City ETJ Total population change has been significant in the 2000 67,890 11,380 79,270 City of College Station and the ETJ. According 2001 72,020 11,494 83,514 to the projections, the ETJ population is 2002 75,752 11,609 87,361 anticipated to increase approximately 17% by 2003 78,309 11,725 90,034 2016. In the City, the population is projected 2004 80,214 11,842 92,056 to increase almost 55% for the period 2000 - 2005 81,930 11,960 93,890 2016. These projections do not account for 2006 84,035 12,080 96,115 any future annexation activity. 2007 86,140 12,201 98,341 2008 88,246 12,323 100,569 2009 90,351 12,446 102,797 2010 92,456 12,571 105,027 2011 94,562 12,696 107,258 2012 96,667 12,823 109,490 2013 98,772 12,952 111,724 2014 100,877 13,081 113,958 2015 102,983 13,212 116,194 2016 105,088 13,344 118,432 0 Platting Trends For the last four out of six years, the total number of lots platted has exceeded 800. A significant proportion of these lots are in the ETJ. Recently, the Subdivision Regulations were amended to require fire flows in the ETJ and likely contributed to the reduced number of lots platted in the ETJ last year. Since 2003, approximately 23% of the lots platted were in the ETJ. • IN r 1 1 FAI i *# T-T' PLAN • RESOLUTION NO. 12 -9 -99 -16.02 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN ANNEXATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That the Municipal Annexation Plan for the City of College Station, Texas, as set out in Exhibit "A', attached hereto is hereby adopted. PART 2: That said municipal annexation plan may be amended by resolution of the College Station City Council. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this 9th day of December 1999. i. ATTEST: APPROVED: ty CONNIE KS, City ecretary Mc HANEY, May pr PROVED: HARVEY CARGILL, R, City Attorney I • t • EXHIBIT A MUNICIPAL ANNEXA'T'ION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Pursuant to Section 43.052 of the Local Government Code, The City of College Station will only annex areas that are identified in this municipal annexation plan or exempt from the provisions of Section 43.052. Areas specifically identified herein may be annexed on the third anniversary of the adoption date of this plan or on the third anniversary an amendment to include such area in this plan. Specific areas planned for adoption, if any are: No areas are identified for annexation. Other areas that may be considered for annexation by the City of College Station include only areas that are exempt from Section 43.052 including: A. Areas which contain fewer than 100 separate tracts of land on which one or more residentiedwellings are located on each tract. B. Areas annexed by petition of more than 50 percent of the real property owners in the area proposed for annexation or by vote or petition of the qualified voters or real •`� property owners. C. An area which is or was the subject of an industrial district contract under Section 42.044 of the Local Government Code. D. An area which is or was the subject of a strategic partnership agreement under Section 43.0751. E. An area annexed under Section 43.026, 43.029 or 43.031 of the Local Government Code. F. An area the City Council of the City of College Station determines that the annexation of the area is necessary to protect the area proposed for annexation or the City of College Station from: a) Imminent destruction of property or injury to persons. b) A condition or use that constitutes a public or private nuisance as defined by background principles of nuisance and property law of the State of Texas. Following adoption of this municipal annexation plan by the College Station City Council, and so long as the City of College Station maintains an Internet website, the City of College Station will post and maintain on its Internet wcbsite: A. This municipal annexation plan. B. Any amendments to include an area in this municipal annexation plan until the date the area is annexed. c. Any amendments to remove an area from this municipal annexation plan until,the date the area is again eligible for inclusion in the plan. 0 ETJ « J *� �� 2� / � Iv, \ }\ . � � \ \. \� t #:� \�� g� % \ �: }« m �/� � /. , \ »� ol N\- �� �\ PROPOSED ANNEXATION rA wr 0 P A 0 n � 0 • z� t 9 A 0 n � 0 t 9 y # t L • e w A 0 n � 0 rA O 0 0 N p eaz�& w � � , $ & t %3a@= � c ¥¥ - � �� gSOO> 2 +eo2 0 � CD x � 0 � D � � • • (D x v o' D CD 0) • �`. .; �`.!�y'�.,� i X 1I a � � .-.: ,. `�. V P ,��: �` ?'•�.' ��4 �� 1 � 1 1 . 1 •� `� : �J •, ...,.,.,.:.,_�,