Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/05/2007 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission.. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning er Development Services Call the meeting to order. AGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Workshop Meeting Thursday, July 5, 2007, 5:30 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Presentation, possible action and discussion on the proposed fiscal year 2007-2008 through fiscal year 2012-2013 Capital Improvement Plan. (JIB 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a memo to City Council regarding the Mazch 29, 2007 Joint Cities of Bryan and College Station Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. (LB) 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on recommended growth management strategies. (BC/JP) • 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update to the Commission on the status of items within the P&Z Plan of Work (see attached). (JS) 7. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding an update on the following item(s): • Rezoning of 44 acres from A-O Agricultural Open and R-4 Multi-Family to A-O Agricultural Open and R-4 Multi-Family for 1300 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South Case #07-500092. This item was presented to P&Z on June 7, 2007 ~ P&Z unamiously recommended approval of the rezoning with the conditions that the concerns and issues of FEMA have been met and approved by FEMA and City Staff. This item was heazd by City Council on June 28, 2007 ~ motion to approve the rezoning failed 3 to 3. • Rezoning from R-l, Single-Family Residential to A-O, Agricultural Open for approximately 4.47 acres generally located at 450 Earl Rudder Freeway South, north of University Drive on southbound SH 6 ~ Case #07-500100. This was presented to P&Z on June 7, 2007 ~ P&Z unanimously recommended approval. This item was heazd by City Council on June 28, 2007 ~ City Council unanimously approved the rezoning. :• Rezoning to amend the permitted uses in the Planned Development District to include townhomes, for approximately 24.48 acres located at 1906 FM 158, and more generally located east of the Crescent Pointe Subdivision on Hwy. 30 ~ Case #07- 500109. This item was presented to P&Z on June 7, 2007 ~ P&Z unanimously recommended approval. This item was heazd by City Council on June 28, 2007 City Council approved the rezoning with a vote of 5 to 1. :• Easement Abandonment for a portion of a 20' wide public utility easement for 1611 University Drive East, generally located across the northern half of lot SA, Block 1 of The Gateway Subdivision, Phase 1 and parallel to University Drive ~ Case #07- • 500114. This item was heard by City Council on June 28, 2007 ~ City Council unanimously approved the easement abandonment. :• Annual review of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and the Comprehensive Plan, including recent UDO amendments, requested UDO amendments, and recent Comprehensive Plan amendments ~ Case #07-500004. This item was presented to P&Z on June 7, 2007 ~ no formal action was taken. This item was heard by City Council on June 28, 2007. 8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. • July 10, 2007 ~ 6:00 p.m. ~ Joint P&Z and CPAC Workshop Meeting ~ College Station Conference Center ~ Meal to be served at 5:30 p.m. • July 11, 2007 ~ 6:00 p.m. ~ East Side Transportation Study Presentation ~ Christ United Methodist Church • July 19, 2007 ~ 6:00 p.m. ~ P&Z Workshop & Regular Meeting ~ College Station City Hall 9. Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding the Comprehensive Planning • process. 10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 11. Adjourn. Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Code Section 551.071} :possible action. The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. Notice is hereby given that a Workshop Meeting of the College Station Planning and Zoning Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on the Thursday, July O5, 2007, at 5:30 P.M. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the day of July, 2007, at ~~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS sy Connie Books, City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of the Workshop Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of • said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website, www.cstx.¢ov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on July _, 2007, at and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: by Dated this day of , 2007. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of , 2007. Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.SOV. Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channe119. • • AGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Cn-v OF COLLEGE S'IA'T7(JN Thursday, July 05, 2007, at 7:00 P.M. 1'GumingerDa~tlapmrntSrre~iea City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 3, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning and • Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 3. Consent Agenda. 3.1 Consideration, discussion and possible action on Absence Requests from meetings. • Dennis Christiansen ~ July 5, 2007 ~ Workshop & Regular Meeting • Harold Strong ~ July 5, 2007 ~ Workshop & Regular Meeting • John Nichols ~ July 19, 2007 ~ Workshop & Regular Meeting 3.2 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting Minutes. • June 7, 2007 ~ Workshop Meeting :• June 7, 2007 ~ Regular Meeting :• June 18, 2007 ~ Workshop Meeting • June 18, 2007 ~ Regular Meeting • Reeular Aeenda 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Variance request to Section 8-I.2, Utility Easements of the Subdivision Regulations and a public hearing, presentation, • possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat being a Replat of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Phase 2 of the Crescent Pointe Subdivision consisting of l O lots on 15.09 acres located at 1500 Copperfield Parkway in the general vicinity of the southwest intersection of Crescent Pointe Parkway and Copperfield Parkway. Case #07-00500119 (LB) 6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a final plat being a replat of University Town Center Phase 1 consisting of 6 lots on 17.73 acres located at 800 University Drive East, generally located on the south side of University between Tarrow Street and Lincoln Avenue. Case #07-00500127 (CH) Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Variance request to Section 13-C, Lot Width and 12-I.3, Relation to Adjoining Street Systems of the Subdivision Regulations and a presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plat for Peach Crossing Subdivision, Phase 2 consisting of 4 lots on 29.56 acres located at 1706 Peach Creek Road just east of the Speedway on Peach Creek Road, at its intersection with Peach Creek Cut-Off in the City's Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction. Case #07-00500073 (LB) 8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat of Lots 9A-R & 9B-R, Block 9, The Villages of Indian Lakes Phase I, being a replat of Lot 9, Block 9 into two residential lots on 3.245 acres, located on Osage Trail Drive, off of Indian Lakes Drive & Chaco Canyon Drive, approximately '/4 mile outside the southern edge of College Station, within the City's Extra-Temtorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Case #07- 00500129(JP) 9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan -Land Use Plan from Regional Retail and Floodplains & Streams to Redevelopment for 3.956 acres located at 1502 Texas Avenue South. Case #07- 00500134 (JP) 10. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a rezoning from C-1 General Commercial to P-MUD Planned Mixed Use District and A-O Agricultural Open for 3.956 acres located at 1502 Texas Avenue South. Case #07-00500130 (JP) 11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 12. Adjourn. Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Code Section 551 071} • uossible action The Planning and Zoning Commtss~on may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the College Station Planning and Zoning • Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on the Thursday, July O5, 2007, at 7:00 P.M. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the day of July, 2007, at • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By Connie Hooks, City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website, www.cstx.gov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on July _, 2007, at and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: by Dated this day of , 2007. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By r~ J Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas day of , 2007. My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.eov. Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. • ~~~' CfIY OF COLLEGE $TRTION d Se.sica 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 /Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM June 1, 2007 TO: Members of the City Council Glenn Brown, City Manager FROM: Lindsay Boyer, AICP, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Joint College Station/Bryan PAZ Meeting At the request of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Staff has prepared this memo to inform the City Council and City Manager of the discussions at their most recent Joint Meeting with the City of Bryan Planning and Zoning Commission. The Joint Meeting of • the College Station and Bryan Planning and Zoning Commissions was held on March 29, 2007. The discussion included updates on the Comprehensive Plans for both cities, and a variety of topics ranging from regional transportation and planning issues to possible collaboration projects between the two cities. A majority of the discussion was focused on transportation priorities. One issue was a joint cities loop project that would provide additional connectivity between the two cities. The City of Bryan currently has roads on their Thoroughfare Plan that could be used to create part of this loop which includes Old San Antonio Road and Texas 47. The Commissions also discussed a joint sidewalk project along South College to aid in the pedestrian and bicycle traffic between Bryan, Northgate, and the AS~M campus. The Commissions also had several information items on the agenda regarding updates on Comprehensive Plans for both cities, ETJ development pressure and annexation, Bryan's Neighborhood Conservation zoning district, and dealing with nonconforming uses. Staff is planning a fall meeting of the Commissions, however a date is not yet set. Future topics for the meeting include continuing discussion of joint planning for the State Highway 30 corridor and the possibility of zoning overlays to create similar development standards for gateways between the cities. Attachments: 1. March 29, 2007 Joint College Station/Bryan Planning & Zoning Commissions Meeting Agenda ~J Home of Texas A&M University • ` CITY OF COLLEGE STRTION PLanrb~ d D~fsj~nrt Srnans 2. March 29, 2007 Joint College Station/Bryan Planning & Zoning Commissions Meeting Minutes 3. Bryan College Station Eagle article, March 30, 2007 pc: Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission Bob Cowell, Director of Planning & Development Services • • Home of Texas A&M University • C1TX OF COLLEGE STATION Planning cfr DetalaPmrnt Srrvirn AGENDA Special Meeting Joint Workshop Meeting of the Cities of Bryan and College Station Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, March 29, 2007, at 11:00 A.M. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas Call Meeting to Order. 2. Introduction of College Station Planning and Zoning Commission and Staff. Introduction of Bryan Planning and Zoning Commission and Staff. 4. Consideration, discussion and possible action regarding identification of Regional Planning Issues: • A. Update on Comprehensive Plan projects 1) City of Bryan 2) City of College Station B. Corridor Planning & Regional Transportation Issues I) Comprehensive Transportation Planning a) College Avenue & Hensel Park b) Highway 30 C. Current Development Concerns 1) ETJ Development Pressure 2) Neighborhood Conservation Zoning 3) Dealing with Grandfathered Uses D. Possible Collaboration Projects 1) Linking park system -Veterans, Park Hudson, and Tiffany Park 2) Aligning Residential Zoning Densities 3) Coordinated Hike and Bike systems E. Increased communication between Cities and other agencies. Discussion of future joint meeting topics. 6. Adjourn. • • The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from Its attomey regarding a pending and contemplated Iitlgation subject or attomey-client privileged infomtatlon. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If Iitlgation or attomey-client privileged information Issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. Notice is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Bryan and College Station Planning and Zoning Commission of Bryan and College Station, Texas will be held on the Thursday, March 29, 2007, at 11:00 A.M. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the day of March, 2007, at CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By Connie Hooks, City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of a Special Meeting of the Bryan and College Station Planning and Zoning Commission, City of Bryan and City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website, www.cstx.¢ov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on March _, 2007, at and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: by Dated this day of , 2007. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of , 2007. Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.~ov. Planning and Zoning meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channe119. • 10 • • CITY OF COI.LECaE STATION fNaxxrrrg d' l'k~rlspmrnt SrrniitY MINUTES point Workshop Meeting Bryan and College Station Planning & Zoning Commission Thursday, March 29, 2007, at 11:00 a.m. Council Chambers College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Nichols, Bill Davis, Derek Dictson, Marsha Sanford, and Glenn Schroeder of the City of College Station Planning and Zoning Commission. Chairman Art Hughes, Commissioners Michael Parks, Don Maxwell, G.H. Jones, Michael Beckendorf, John Clark, Robert 'Thornton, Johnny Bond and Ralph Davilla of the City of Bryan Planning and Zoning Commission. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Dennis Christiansen and Harold Strong of the College Station Planning and Zoning Commission. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: David Ruesink of the City of College Station. COLLEGE STATION CITY STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Lindsay Boyer, Crissy Hartl, Jennifer Reeves, Jason Schubert and Grant Wencel, Senior Planner Jennifer Prochazka, Acting Director Lance Simms, Planning Administrator Molly Hitchcock, Senior Assistant City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Graduate Civil Engineers Carol Cotter and Josh Norton, Transportation Planner Ken Fogle, First Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson, Deputy City Manager Terry Childers, Information Services Representative Justine Wolfe and Staff Assistants Lisa Lindgren and Brittany Korthauer. BRYAN CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Joey Dunn, Senior Planner Haynes, Transportation Planner John Dean, Fulgham. 1. Call meeting to order. Planning Manager Lindsay Guindi, Deputy Martin Zimmerman, Staff Planner Randy Staff Planner and Downtown Planner Julie Chairman Nichols called the City of College Station Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to order at 11:20 a.m. Chairman Hughes of the City of Bryan Planning and Zoning Commission called the meeting to order at 11:21 a.m. March 29, 2007 Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 11 2. Introduction of College Station Planning and Zoning Commission and Staff. • Chairman Nichols began the introductions for the Commission. Acting Director Lance Simms introduced City staff. Introduction of Bryan Planning and Zoning Commission and Staff. Chairman Hughes began the introductions for the Commission. Planning Manager Lindsay Guindi introduced City staff. 4. Consideration, discussion and possible action regarding identification of Regional Planning Issues: A. Update on Comprehensive Plan projects 1) City of Bryan 2) City of College Station Lindsay Guindi, Planning Manager gave an update regarding the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Bryan. Jennifer Prochazka, Senior Planner gave an update regarding the Comprehensive Plan process for the City of College Station. After both presentations there was discussion between both Commissions. • B. Corridor Planning & Regional Transportation Issues 1) Comprehensive Transportation Planning a) College Avenue & Hensel Park b) Highway 30 Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner for the City of College Station gave a presentation regarding the City of College Station's Comprehensive Transportation Planning, Highway 30, College Avenue and Hensel Park. Lindsay Guindi, Planning Manager and John Dean, Transportation Planner of the City of Bryan, gave presentations regarding the City of Bryan's Comprehensive Transportation Planning, Highway 30, College Avenue and Hensel Park. Commissioners had general discussion on the issue. C. Current Development Concerns 1) ETJ Development Pressure 2) Neighborhood Conservation Zoning 3) Dealing with Grandfathered Uses Lance Simms, Acting Director of the City of College Station gave a presentation regarding the Current Development Concerns for the City of College Station and • in the ETJ. March 29, 2007 Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 12 Martin Zimmerman, Senior Planner of the City of Bryan gave a presentation • regarding Neighborhood Conservation Zoning. Molly Hitchcock, Planning Coordinator, briefly explained College Station's regulation of how non conforming uses. There was general discussion between the Commissions regarding the topics. D. Possible Collaboration Projects 1) Linking park system -Veterans, Park Hudson, and Tiffany Park 2) Aligning Residential Zoning Densities 3) Coordinated Hike and Bike systems City Staff from College Station and Bryan gave brief updates regarding the above-referenced items. Commissioners from College Station and Bryan had general discussion regarding those items. E. Increased communication between Cities and other agencies. Chairman Nichols mentioned keeping TAMU and the County Planning or Engineer as involved as possible in order to assist with ETJ issues. 5. Discussion of future joint meeting topics. • There was discussion regarding future joint meetings between the two Commissions. Both Commissions and staff agreed to have two meetings a year, one in the spring and one in the fall, every six months. The meeting place would alternate between the City of College Station and the City of Bryan. 6. Adjourn. Commissioner Sanford motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0). Chairman Hughes accepted the motion to adjourn the meeting as well for the Bryan Planning and Zoning Commission. Approved: John Nichols, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: • Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services March 29, 2007 Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 13 The Bryan-College Station Eagle > Printer Friendly Version LJ Page 1 of 2 The Bryan-College Station Eagle -Printer Friendly Page Updated 7:15 AM on Friday, March 30, 2007 Planners outline priorities both cities By APRIL AVISON Eagle Staff Writer Sidewalks for South College Avenue and a traffic loop around the community emerged as priorities from a Thursday meeting of the Bryan and College Station planning and zoning commissions. The annual meeting offers an opportunity for commissioners from both cities to discuss regional issues involving transportation, comprehensive planning and possible projects for collaboration. They also updated each other on how programs within each city are working - including Bryan's new neighborhood conservation zoning, by which residents can petition to have no more than two unrelated residents share a home. Leaders from both cities said they'd like to see sidewalks along South College, which serves as a corridor between College Station's Northgate entertainment district and downtown Bryan. About a mile of the thoroughfare is in College Station, and it extends more than four miles into • Bryan. South College is maintained by the Texas Department of Transportation, but the cities could build sidewalks along the road, said John Clark, a Bryan planning commissioner. "You only have to drive down South College after a shift change at [Texas] A&M to see the pedestrians and bicyclists literally in a ditch," Clark said. "That's not right. That's a lack of planning. It's been a shame that over the years it's been overlooked by College Station, Bryan, A&M and TxDOT. You have deadlock from four different entities because nobody is really that passionate about it." It costs about $200,000 per mile to build a sidewalk, according to officials with a local engineering firm. But building a sidewalk requires more than money - there's a need for advisory boards and elected officials to get behind the project, Clark said. "This," he said, looking around the room full of city staff and planning commission members after the meeting, "is how you get it done." A South College Corridor Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Bryan City Council in 2002, and cites a need for bike and pedestrian paths. We want to widen and improve it, and we want to add sidewalks," said Bryan Transportation Planner John Dean. "It comes down to a funding issue." • Roadway repair and installation of sidewalks and lighting could cost about $22 million, according to the redevelopment plan. 14 http://www.theea~le.cotn/includes/nrintuaee.nhn h/1 /2()~7 The Bryan-College Station Eagle > Printer Friendly Version Page 2 of 2 A funding solution could be the downtown Bryan tax increment financing district, which was • approved by the City Council in December. The TIF is a mechanism by which a portion of property taxes on new development will go into a fund to pay for infrastructure upgrades in a zone that encompasses South College Avenue. While sidewalks could be built in the near future, a loop around the city could take much longer, said College Station Transportation Planner Ken Fogle. "We're not at a point where we're putting an alignment on a map, but we're talking to Bryan about this because when it's all said and done, it will be one loop around the community," Fogle said. Bryan does have a line on a map, portions of which correspond with OSR and Texas 47. "There's obstacles in both cities," Dean said. "For example, we have to avoid the airport. If this proves to be a TxDOT road, there's going to have to be a way to fund it. I think it's very likely that it will develop in segments." It could be a toll road, Fogle said, and TxDOT engineers would have to determine that a motorist demand for the thoroughfare exists before it could be built. The state transportation department announced last week that it has to return about $290 million in federal funding allocated for projects across Texas. • "Even if they raise the gas tax in the state, TxDOT will be out of money by 2014," said Bryan Commissioner Michael Parks. "Growth is coming. We're going to have to get out our No. 2 pencils and our Big Chief notepads and try to figure out how to fix this." During Thursday's meeting, planning and zoning commissioners also discussed the possibility of linking the planned trail system in Bryan's Park Hudson area to College Station's Veterans Park. College Station Planning Commission Chairman John Nichols said Texas 30 -another roadway partially shared by both cities -should be discussed during a future meeting. The planning and zoning commissions, which make recommendations to their respective city councils, agreed to meet more than once a year in the future. "Certainly, I learned a lot," Nichols said. "One of the things I take away from this is I'd like to see the Highway 30 discussion continue, and communicate to our citizens that we are making a collaborative effort on that gateway." • April Avison's a-mail address is april.avison@theeagle.com. Printed from: ht#p //www #heeagle._com/stones/033007/local 20070330006,php r~ 15 httn://www.theeaele.com/includes/nrintnaee.nhn F/1 /2~()7 • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning c~ Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 /Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM June 27, 2007 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Growth Management Strategies On May 29, 2007, a joint meeting of the City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, and Parks and Recreation Advisory Board was held to discuss growth management strategies for the City of College • Station and its extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ). A report, compiled by Kendig Keast Collaborative, the City's Comprehensive Plan consultants, was presented for discussion. The findings of the report concluded that development in the ETJ is, or is at least perceived to be, easier than development within the City limits. This is, in part, due to the availability of street and utility infrastructure, lack of development regulation and standards, lower land costs, fewer development fees and taxes, and an overall lack of development constraints in the ETJ. The City should incent development within the City limits by creating a compatible development environment in the ETJ and providing identifiable benefit to those that choose to develop in the City. Further, while encouraging development inside the City limits, quality development that will benefit the City both financially and aesthetically should be further incentivized. The City must create a distinct line between the City and its rural ETJ and must provide a clear advantage for developing in the City limits. These recommendations are not intended to stop development, but guide it in areas that are more desired by the City because of decreased service costs and availability of services. As property is annexed, new growth areas will need to be identified so that over time, the City will be able to provide services in a way that maintains the City's fiscal health. After reviewing the report prepared by Kendig Keast Collaborative, staffs recommendation is that the City employ several measures, prior to completion of the Comprehensive Plan, in order to incent development within the City limits and reduce the instance of and impacts of the development patterns that are occurring in the ETJ. At this time, staff is looking for specific direction on these measures from the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council. The recommendations that follow have been separated into those that are recommended in the City limits and those that are recommended in the ETJ. Necessary ordinance or policy changes have also been included in the discussion. Growth Management In The City's Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction The City's ability to manage growth in the ETJ is limited by the authority given to Texas cities in the Local • Government Code (LGC). Cities cannot extend zoning or building codes into their ETJ, nor can they 16 • directly regulate density. Texas cities are, however, authorized to regulate the subdivision of land in their ETJ. Because the City's ability to manage growth is limited, it must fully utilize the tools that are available. In order to prevent unchecked growth and density in the ETJ and to prevent the proliferation of individually operated package sewer plants, the City has submitted an application requesting the Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) for sewer service in this area. The CCN would enable and require the City to serve sewer in the ETJ, when it is requested and is consistent with the sewer extension policy. In the CCN application, the City has certified that it has both the ability and desire to serve sewer in that CCN area. Extending sewer service into the ETJ, without controlling growth in another way, will likely spur urban density development outside of the City limits. Neither land use controls nor building codes can be employed outside of the City limits, creating concern for the public health, safety and welfare when densities are increased. In addition, the roadway and drainage infrastructure in the ETJ is not adequate to serve urban densities. If the CCN for sewer service is awarded to the City, the City should amend its Subdivision Regulations to control the potential density, as discussed below, and should create a sewer service extension policy that requires that the developer bear all costs of sewer extension and service. to addition to pursing the sewer CCN in the ETJ, there are two primary methods of managing growth in the ETJ, more aggressive use of the Subdivision Regulations and annexation. Subdivision Regulation Amendments Minimum lot size and lot width -Several amendments should be made to the Subdivision Regulations to address some of the density concerns in the ETJ, including creating a minimum lot size and expanding current lot widths. The benefits of reducing densities in the ETJ include reducing the number of structures that are built in an area that has no building or fire regulations, reducing traffic on substandard roadways, and reducing the amount of run-off in areas that lack the drainage infrastructure to accommodate it. • Creating a larger minimum lot size is consistent with the City's current Comprehensive Plan, which calls for rural densities in the ETJ, and is supported by the County's effort to increase the minimum lot size needed to have an on-site septic facility. Larger lot requirements may also address the concem of property becoming 'unreachable' and precluded from future growth or economic development activities by reserving locations for future utility extensions. Small lot, urban development in the ETJ can preclude annexation or extension of utilities that may be needed or desired beyond these areas in the future. In addition, requiring a larger lot size will likely reduce the instance of sewer extension requests in the ETJ because on-site septic facilities are more likely to be used. In the future, the land will likely be further subdivided and more densely developed and sewer would be extended at that time. Kendig Keast recommended, and staff concurs with, a minimum of twenty acres for lots developing in the ETJ. Increasing the required minimum lot width in the ETJ is consistent with both TxDOT's and the City's access management policies created to reduce the number of access points to roadways. Staff recommends that the minimum lot width be determined by a sliding scale based on the design speed of the roadway, but in no case should the width of a lot in the ETJ be less than 400 feet. Remove urban density option - A current exemption in the Subdivision Regulations that allows urban densities to be developed when urban roadway standards are used within the proposed development needs to be removed. The benefits of reducing densities in the ETJ include reducing traffic on substandard roadways, reducing the amount of run-off in areas that lack the infrastructure to accommodate it, and reducing the number of structures in an area that is not subject to building or fire codes. Concurrency /Adequate Public Facilities -Staff recommends that the Subdivision Regulations • be amended to include specific requirements to address the timing and quality of infrastructure extensions, called'concun'ency' or'adequate public facilities.' This would require that proposed 17 • developments in the ETJ verify that the infrastructure needed to meet the health and safety requirements of the development, including roadway infrastructure, is in place prior to approval. The City must extend its utility master plans and thoroughfare plan further into the ETJ so that necessary easements and rights-of-way can be obtained as development occurs. These master plans are currently scheduled to be completed with the Comprehensive Plan update. Parkland Dedication -Staff recommends extending parkland dedication requirements into the ETJ to make development in the ETJ more financially comparable to that within the City limits. Fees, instead of land dedications, are preferred for ETJ developments because of challenges related to the ownership and maintenance of land dedications outside of the City limits. Staff recommends that fee-in-lieu of land dedications be used to buy property further out in the ETJ for future park development or for the acquisition and development of community or regional parks in the area. Further, to ensure that these fee-in-lieu dedications are adequate for future acquisition and development, the existing parkland dedication fees need to be updated to reflect current land costs. Open Space Requirements -Requiring open space with development, in addition to parkland dedication requirements, can create the open space that is desired by the community, without the burden of public ownership or maintenance on the City. This can be accomplished through an amendment to the Subdivision Regulations. Annexation The second growth management alternative in the ETJ, more aggressive annexation, would enable areas of higher density, where desirable, and require that development in those areas, once annexed, comply with City regulations, including zoning and land use, and building and fire codes. Additionally, police, fire, sanitation, and park services would be extended at the time of • annexation and City property taxes would be assessed to the property owners. Generally, City facilities, such as roadways and parks, are already used by these residents without property tax revenue for the City. Upon annexation, property is zoned as A-O Agricultural Open as a holding zone until it is appropriate for development. As is recommended in the next section, minimum lot sizes should be increased for the holding zone designation to reduce the densities in rural areas until adequate facilities and services can be provided. As you may recall, the City is currently pursuing the annexation of over 6,700 acres in five different areas. That process should be complete in late 2007. City staff has also begun to identify additional areas that could be placed in a three-year annexation plan. Annexation also leads to a larger ETJ, which further extends the City's subdivision authority and the potential to manage growth. Growth Management Inside The City Limits The City must clearly identify desired investment areas within the City limits, including areas that are contiguous to current development and easily served by existing public facilities and services, such as utilities, roadway and park infrastructure, and fire, police and sanitation services. Infill development and redevelopment within the core of the City should also be encouraged. Once these areas are identified, the City will be able to incent appropriate development in these areas. There are several tools that can be used to encourage development in areas within the City, including the following: Focus Capital Resources The City must be praactive in incepting and encouraging growth in appropriate locations to occur by using capital funds to ensure that adequate infrastructure and services are available in these • areas. The City needs to focus its resources ahead of growth to ensure that the property is ready for development and should not provide major utility extensions outside of these areas. Capital 18 • funds must also be used in existing developed areas to maintain and upgrade existing infrastructure in order to maintain current facilities and services and encourage infill and redevelopment within the core of the City. Amendments to Subdivision Reraulations Concurrency /Adequate Public Facilities -Staff recommends that additional requirements, such as adequate public facilities ordinances, apply in areas where development is desirable but difficult or too expensive to serve with current City resources. Adequate public facilities ordinances, also called concurrency, are used to address the timing and quality of infrastructure extensions. This would require that proposed developments verify that the infrastructure needed to support and serve the development, including roadway and utility infrastructure, is either in place prior to approval or that they be provided concurrent with development. Impact Fees 8 Oversized Participation- Impact fees should be assessed in areas of the City to help finance the infrastructure needed to support growth, such as major roadways and primary utility infrastructure that are identified on the Thoroughfare and Master Utility Plans. In some growth areas, the City should construct improvements ahead of growth or provide needed oversized participation in order to attract development to these areas. In other areas, infrastructure should be extended with development and financed by that development, without the use of oversized participation funds. In still other areas, extension of infrastructure may be avoided all together. Zoning Areas not able to be currently served with adequate public facilities and services should retain their holding zone designation, A-O Agricultural Open. In some instances, these areas should retain this designation to create a more distinct difference between urban /suburban areas and rural areas, or to respond to environmental constraints. Minimum lot sizes should be increased • for the City's holding zone and rural residential zoning districts in order to decrease the density of potential development. Staff recommends that the minimum lot size should be no less than twenty acres in the Agricultural-Open zoning district, as recommended by Kendig Keast Collaborative. Residential subdivisions zoned A-OR Agricultural-Open Residential should have a minimum lot size of 5 acres. Additionally, potential protection areas need to be identified, and appropriately zoned, to conserve resources, including floodplain, mature vegetation, natural features, wetlands and habitat areas. Following feedback and direction regarding the aforementioned strategies, staff will develop specific recommendations for further consideration by the Commission and Council. • 19 • • l~~ u .0 m ~ a~ V ~O ma v y .di O Z ~f3 N R ~ y r t0 .~ ~ ~ 0 # ~a ~ U ~ y ~a~ c ~ v~ o as ~ o ~~> rn V ~O a ~~ ~ ~~ m$ $ ° m a c~ ~ o M ~ ' N ~~ a > ~w a .~ a a ~ n ~ o d U ° E X c ~ ' p ~ ~ Q O o ~ c O yo p u~ ~ v~ O c ~ c V y C +- ` ~ C y c p m N O O . y L _ ~ ~ ~ ~ L . . N _ ~+ 7 a '; N ~ ~ ~ N Z m O rn to rn = c~ as 'c `~° ? can ~- o c 'v 3 Q ++ r a> fl.. o ~ m .L... (3 o N ~, N ~ U c m c O C ~ '~ M ~ ~ ~ U O a~ U N ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ Z o ~? E c ~ O as v a c ~ Z a o ~~ FO- U QN ~ _ > aiZ .S ~L m d Y J O_ J W U ~, a ~ m > .~ m c °~ ~ c o ~ ° LL. c m a o m L U o m ~' o o U ~ o m m °~~ o c L:, as '° s cd c m ~ m rn c y 'O ~ $ .C m> ~ C ~ ~ N .O +_.. N 0 ~ '~ E _ d • o or ~ .= 3; -~ o U ~p U ~ a .. __ r+ v ~ ~ L ~ U ~ ca ~ O i0 U v~ FO- ~ Q~ - ~ Q 3 a m c~a v U k W ~ ~ ~ ~ Y d O ~ ~ ~ ° a a a ~ fn N O N N N > > > > > ' ' Q Q Q Q ~ ' `~ Q M N ~, ~ t ~ ~, ~ ~, ~ ~, ~, 01 ~ ~, ~ A ~ ~ ~ r ^ `` W ~ ~ ~ Y Y Y Y ^` ~ ~1, t A' `1 ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ . ~ ~= c ~ L ~ a ~ a ~ p ~ cQ ~ N t U ? ~' o ~ ca ~ '~ ~ o U ~ -° °' d o f i ~ c c ~ ° p c , .N E p i a a> ;: n U ~ a c ~ ~ o ~ U N ~ - ~ = ~ c ~ _ ~ c a ~ o a? ~ ~ m ~ ~, O ~' ~ ~ ` ~. c o~ O U O a d c -o a p ~ ~ •c c `° a o a ~ ~ ° o ~ ° ~ ~ a ° az ~ .~ ~ - > ~ f 3 ~ ~ ~,a ~ O ~~ I N m 'O o ' a ~ c ~ v '~ ` f- N a y N -O N -E o N~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ U a~ t 0 c U c ~ ~ co c o c o a_ ~ ~0 c O~ c N ~ ~ v ,~ O O 01 O U~ L cn C O C C cB N N C O ca ~ y N (0 U N O ~O tT = . .N U N U ~ j c C ,O a ~~ ~ rn2Z cN Ali N ~ N cp ~c ~e~ ~ C1 c`0 O O ~' c ~~ t t f t O f Q ` + ~~ N N ~ ' X O (n U J .~ Q Z Cn _ ',.ti 1- (n H U fl d ~ W U r ti °o N N iii a~°i o. N M O m D) m a • • 'a ~, 'v Q ~ V o ~, a 0 N O d N 3 ~+ .~ ~ _ 0 ~ 3a ~ V ~ d ~a o v ''' O ~C1 = O ~ ~'' > v m ~O a 00 ~ c .no c`a ~ m o ~ ~ c ~ ~ N m ~ ~ E ~ u~i E c '++ c '++ rn E~ C ~ ~ N U to Ott N ~ ~ w ~ `' ~ _ +. ~ ~ ~ p N C N m o .fl ~ o ~ o ti . o~w m oo ° o ~ - c o .3~. ~- - ~° ~ .~ ~ ~ .. > co a~ ~ _ ~~ m m m ° o ~ O U ~ ' ~ a v o U o Q Q Q o~ a c w ~ ~ :„ ~`c 3 N ~ ~ ~ O (~0 c~0 , ~> ~ O > _ ` ° Y ~ m ~ N = m a ~ ~ m a ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ U vi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c a a 0 0 > > °~ ~ ~ > > N to ~U O _ Q Q Q ~" ~~~ L ,~ Y 7~ N ~ C ~ ` (0 O ~ w.. C ~ N Q ~ N m o. m a N ~t ~- N o7S U > O C ~ ~ ~ O p N O N N ~ C C a a p p> a m m ~ m c'rnty o u1 ~ ~ ~' ~° cn E ` n. ~' ~ - ~ ~ a o o x E c O •~ O N c > U ~ N ~ L N ~' C ' ~ l0 ~ C ~ N O a a c~ ~ ~, s L ,~, O _ ' C ~ (0 ~ ~ V O E a f0 (B .,,, O C~ r+ O C '; ~ a ~ ~ ~ W ~~ «° c o o E m on o -coaomo~ ~ ~ v> .- f0 E O U N c :«~ a~ 'p O ' N c v N U tq N L> cv~~v~~o ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ m ~ o p a>i a v 'c ~ E C O ~ C C Y ~ >, U m N m V ~. O p m~ d o ~ ° ~ 0 3 S c° m rn c m c ~ > °~ ~ ~ o ho ~ a~ o "-' ~ •° o v U ~o ~co ~ p~ ~ o c c v ~ 0 c O o o ~«. a~ 'ms d s mcarnoo> ~ ~~~ N a 'o - aN C +-~ o o ~.333~33 a o ~ ~ a °~ ~ ~ ~ m_ ~ ya ~mma~ _o a O N ~ a~ ~ ~a O O L .~ ~ c ~ 7 ~ a~>m > Q>~~~~> ' ~ ` U C E E O 7 > C O C ~ C ~„ C> E ~ t/! r N M d' In Cfl ' F- 1 1 ~ O ~ N O N O O N OC °" t 7 7 ~~ .~ ~ 4+ yp-. gyp.. W Cn U - a U _ > 0 ~ U (A fn °~ co to cu co m cp ate: ~: : . cn cn cn cn cn cn N cep ~i m N M 0 N N (Q n. • 'v d a V O ma A 0 N 0 Z O O c .O ~ d ~ C N ,~ to ~ o ami N uJ n > > ~'' U r N ~ ~ . Q * ~ V 0~ t+ ~ a a~i m V _~ ~ ° ~ ~ +~+ ~' w m C ~? N w O 01 ~ m '~ ~ O E ~ R y ".. ~ ~ ~ v N .O a N N N N N N N N N ~ a s ~ ~ N N .- ~ a M ~ ~ iii N ~ 3 C m ~ O co ~ > ~ ~ •~ W N N V = ~ C O U L O ~ m ~ V ~ mL O p) c as_. ` r 'N . m o y ~c 3 ~ c a a~ o ~ o 'y O~ ~ E 0 O m y G. m ` O X N ~. m O ? c Z LL ~ H ~ > ~ ~ 'C V '00 c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U Y J U = = d m Q ( j ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ m a; m ~ a~ ~ m '~ ° :: a~ m m m m a~ a~ a~ m O ~~ O ~ N O U U O U O U O U O U O U U ~j ~ N N N ~+ >, w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ c0 ~ ~ ~ ca N m m ~ sm . O . C O .O ~ ° ~ a a y m .~_ ~ > U ~ $_ E m E +O+ m m ~ cv ~ C C N Q ` O N V C (0 7 ~ ~O ~ O~'w ~ N m U N N a- (O C O ~ c~ L m~cumi N vi > m 3 U 3~ „~ O O ~~ ~ p) ~ C ~ O Q) C C' ~ C 'O O O m O Q ~ U~ w m c3 ~ ~ C p N N c c ~ m W N ~ ~ fn ~ U Z E ~ T N c a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' O. 0 ~ O ~ C U ~ C 7 ~ U (n U fn 1 t l d _ U d _ r; O ~ W ° ~ . ~ : - i U 6/18/2007) Lisa Lindgren -July 5 Pa e 1 • From: "Christiansen, Dennis" <Dennis-cQtamu.edu> To: <Ilindgren~cstx.gov> Date: 6/17/2007 6:15 PM Subject: July 5 Lisa, I will miss the July 5 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. I will be out of state. Thanks for handling this request. r ~~ 26 City of College Station • Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name: Harold Strong Request Submitted on: June 20, 2007 I will not be in attendance at the meeting of: July 5, 2007 for the reason(s) specified: Attending a conference out of the country (Signature) This request shall be submitted to Lisa Lindgren one-week nor to the meeting date. • • z~ 6%27/2007 Lisa Lmd ren Jul P&Z Meetm sand re uesf for absence Jul 19 T_~._ _____________~______._ __________. • From: "John Nichols" <Jpn@ag.tamu.edu> To: <Llindgren@cstx.gov> Date: 6/27/2007 4:04 PM Subject: July P&Z Meetings and request for absence (July 19) Dear Lisa, I will be attending the July 5 meeting. However, I will not be able to attend the July 19, 2007 meeting of the College Station Planning and Zoning Commission due to along-planned family committment. Please submit this to the commission for their consideration as a request for pardon. I appreciate their consideration and approval. Thank you. Sincerely, John P. Nichols Chair College Station Planning and Zoning Commission John P. Nichols Professor and Interim Head Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M University College Station TX 77843-2124 • Phone: 979-845-8491 (faculty office) Phone: 979-845-2116 (Department Office) Fax: 979-862-3019 E-mail: jpn@tamu.edu Website: http://agecon.tamu.edu • 28 MINUTES ~1TY O~ COi.~.~~ STATION I'tanuirlg d' l~urlopmrnt .Strricrx Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, )une 7, 2007, at 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Nichols, Dennis Christiansen, Bill Davis, Derek Dictson, Marsha Sanford, Glenn Schroeder and Harold Strong. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: James Massey. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Lindsay Boyer, Crissy Hartl, Jason Schubert, Senior Planner Jennifer Prochazka, Transportation Planner Ken Fogle, Graduate Civil • Engineers Carol Cotter and Josh Norton, Director Bob Cowell, Planning Administrator Molly Hitchcock, Deputy City Manager Terry Childers, First Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson, Assistant City Attorney Mary Ann Powell, Information Services Representative Bryan Cook, Staff Assistant Lisa Lindgren. Call the meeting to order. Chairman Nichols called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. There was general discussion on regular agenda items 5, 6, 7 and 8. 3. Introduction of Bob Cowell, AICP, as Director of Planning & Development Services. (TC) Deputy City Manager Terry Childers introduced the new Planning and Development Services Director, Bob Cowell, to the Commission. 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding different types of zoning. (JP) Jennifer Prochazka, Senior Planner, gave a presentation regarding zonings, including the different types of zonings and the differences between the zonings. • June 7, 2007 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 29 • 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update to the Commission on the status of items within the P&Z Plan of Work (see attached). (JS) Staff Planner, Jason Schubert presented the updates on the Plan of Work. Chairman Nichols recessed the workshop meeting at 7:05 p.m. in order to begin the regular meeting. 6. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding an update on the following item(s): • An ordinance rezoning 3.331 acres from A-O (Agricultural Open) to R-1, (Single-Family Residential) at 14125 Renee Lane, generally located at the intersection of Barron Road and Renee Lane. The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval on April 19, 2007, and the City Council voted unanimously to approve the rezoning on May 24, 2007. • An ordinance rezoning 3.611 acres from PDD (Planned Development District) to A-P (Administrative Professional) at 525 William D. Fitch Parkway, generally located on the north side of William D. Fitch Parkway across from Castlegate Subdivision. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted to • recommend approval to City Council with a 4-0-1 vote; Commissioner Schroeder, Dictson, Sanford and Strong were in favor and Chairman Nichols abstained from the vote. The City Council voted unanimously to approve the rezoning on May 24, 2007. • An ordinance amending Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Section 5.2 of the Unified Development Ordinance, regarding Residential Dimension Standards. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval on May 3, 2007, and the City Council voted unanimously to approve the ordinance amendment on May 24, 2007. • An ordinance amending Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Section 6.4.E of the Unified Development Ordinance, regarding Portable Storage Structures. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval on April 19, 2007, and the City Council voted 5-1 for approval of the ordinance amendment (with one minor change regarding permits for residential use) on May 24, 2007. • An ordinance amending Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Section 7.6 of the Unified Development Ordinance, regarding buffers. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval on May 3, 2007, and the City Council voted . unanimously to approve the ordinance amendment on May 24, 2007. June 7, 2007 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 30 • An ordinance amending Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Article 2 Development Review Bodies, Article 3 Development Review Procedures and Article 5 Design District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards regarding Concept Plans. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval on May 3, 2007, and the City Council voted unanimously to approve the ordinance amendments on May 24, 2007. Commission reviewed the items that were presented to the City Council. 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. • June 12, 2007 ~ 6:00 p.m. ~ CPAC Meeting • June 18, 2007 ~ 6:00 p.m. ~ P&Z Workshop & Regular Meeting College Station Conference Center • July 10, 2007 ~ 6:00 p.m. ~ Joint P&Z and CPAC Workshop Meeting Director, Bob Cowell reviewed the upcoming calendar of events for the Planning and Zoning Commission. • 8. Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding the Comprehensive Planning process. (JP) Jennifer Prochazka, Senior Planner, presented an update on the Comprehensive Planning processes. 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. The following items were discussed as items of interest for future topics on a workshop agenda. • ETJ Issues • Flooding and Development • Subdivision Regulations and ETJ Issues • Joint meeting with Planning and Zoning Commission, County Officials and City Engineers • Chairman Nichols reconvened the workshop meeting at 9:05 p.m. June 7, 2007 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 31 • 10. Ad' ours. l Commissioner Schroeder motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Sanford seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0). Workshop meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Approved: John Nichols, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services • ~1 ~J June 7, 2007 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 32 • CITY 41~ Cnt..tJ~E STA;TI~7N MrrRxirt~ eF Ikurlop+~+rt Srrnicex CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Jarrie~;~[as~~y COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Nic~o~s, # avis, Derek Dictson, Marsha Sanford, Glenn Schroeder, Dennis Christiansen, and HarolS~rong. S-• COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. 0o an to ssist~t .t. ~ _, i~ gren. 1. Call meeting to'' ` r. ~. Chairman l~.t~il'~ called the?4~tin`~i th circler at 7:10 p.m. .~ ,-~: ; 2. tir Citizens ~°~"r ~., No one spc5k~ ,during the pil~~ic hearing. 3. Consent rlggp,~ta. ,,, . 3.1 Consideratiou'-'discussion and possible action to approve meeting minutes. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Staff Pl~nt~ers Lindsay Buyer, .Crissy Hartl, Jason Schubert, Senior Planner Jennifer Prochazka, Direc,>'ot Bob Cowell P(~nnintg Administrator Molly ,~, ,, Hitchcock, Graduate Civil Engineer J~S1i~~o,~C~, Tran,ix~r~~nun Planner Ken Fogle, Deputy City Manager Terry Childers, il-~jnt ~~yt~t~i~t ~ ity ~~Attorney Carla Robinson, Assistant City Attorney Mai Ann Powell; Infc~rn~~iticin Services Representative Bryan C k dS ffA 't"~"~;' d MINUTES Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, dune 7, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas • May 17, 2007 ~ Workshop Meeting Minutes :• May 17, 2007 ~ Regular Meeting Minutes 3.2 Consideration, discussion and possible action on a request for absence from meetings. • Derek Diction ~ June 18, 2007 ~ Workshop & Regular Meeting June 7, 2007 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 5 33 • Commissioner Christiansen motioned to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0). Re l~u ar A eg nda 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda. 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Variai~~e request to Section 13-C, ,~., ~ Lot Width and 12-L3, Relation to Adjoining Str~~€' S~i~~ , s of the Subdivision Regulations and a presentation, possible action, -~,Md discu n on a Preliminary Plat for Peach Crossing Subdivision, Phase..~:'c4~sting of ~~` son 29.56 acres located at 1706 Peach Creek Road just eas~~f the Speedway on _, ' ~h Creek Road, at its intersection with Peach Creep, ~'~it-0ffir4 the City's ~ ~~ra~Territorial Jurisdiction. Case #07-00500073 (LB) - Chairman Nichols stated that .this item was pullc~ ~tc;>m the agenda and will be heard at a later date. 6. Public hearing, presentation, possit~le u~fic~~~iran~ ~liscu~sion on a Final Plat for The • Villages of Indian Lakes Phase ], t~rjng a rep)~t of Lot 5, Block 9 into two residential lots Qa 3 , acres, locat~,~i un Indi~• Lakes Drive, off of Arrington Road, approx' ''`` tel~~ ' 4 'le outside ~~~ southern edge of College Station, within the City's E~ rritori urisdiction (~,TJ). Case #07-00500086 (JP) ~~~~• _ _ . ~$~,,r ~'~ ,~{~, ,. Jenn~fe~ Fiu~hark~;iior `I~lnnner;, presented the Final Plat and recommended ,~ l a~ir~~ral: ~_' _ ads' .Chalva, 181 ~ ~ schai fail Drive, College Station, Texas. Mr. Chalva stated th ' ,,, homeown ~ d tYe developer had a meeting earlier in the week and had a folct4~• up me ng after that. He stated that there were excellent commuii't~~~~ons a}"that he understood that the vision of Indian Lakes was going forward a~'` ~d and that the homeowners were not very excited about the replat but that;#fiey accept it as something that can happen and as long as it is not a trend of things to come they can accept that. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the Replat as submitted by staff. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0). 7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a rezoning of 44 acres from A-O Agricultural Open and R-4 Multi-Family to A-O Agricultural Open and R-4 Multi-Family for 1300 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South. Case #07- • 00500092 (LB) June 7, 2007 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 5 34 • Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planner, presented the rezoning and recommended tabling the rezoning until the floodplain issues had been satisfactorily resolved. Josh Norton, Graduate Civil Engineer, was called upon to answer questions in general by the Commission regarding the floodplain issues. Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan Engineers, 511 University Drive, Suite 204, College Station, Texas. Ms. Morgan stated that the comments received from FEMA for the most part were minor. She stated that the were three items that could possibly be significant with regard to the locatio floodplain. Those items were as follows: ~'~ ~' FEMA asked that the modeling of the stream read es be c ~~' ed. FEMA wanted the models to be split out and run separately ~ ed of ru ' .them all to ether. ~ g ~` FEMA wanted a different contraction, ' ` expans on coefficient C~fl'',l?e ,used than .~~ what was used previously. FEMA pr vi ~e fo `ula to be used. ~=~ ~.. . r -= - FEMA wanted a sub critical flow regime to ~~ ',used instead of the mixed flow regime that was used. ,~', John Clayton, Place Properties, ~ F 1 ~ ,,- q'Conner ~Ivd., Dallas, Texas. Mr. Clayton spoke to the Commissioil~ regar~~ thg„flop"dplain issues and addressed their concerns and uestions. ~:_ ~°_~, Commissi ''. Chris ~~ sen motio ed to recommend approval of the rezoning o ou with the c `' Rion that the concerns and issues of FEMA be meta and City Staff. Commissioner Davis se ~' oti otion (7-0). 8. lic hearing, tatio ible action, and discussion on a rezoning from R- le Family 'dentia o A-O Agricultural Open for 1 lot on 4.47 acres loca t 450 Earl ~ dder6Freeway South, generally located north of University Drive `' uthbou . ~ Earl Rudder Freeway South at the city limit. Case #07- 500100 ( )> Crissy Hartl,~~~i<aff Planner, presented the rezoning and stated that the request was in compliance with the comprehensive plan and recommended approval. Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan Engineers, 511 University Drive, Suite 204, College Station, Texas. Ms. Morgan addressed the Commission in order to answer any questions that they had. Commissioner Sanford motioned to recommend approval of the rezoning to City Council as presented by staff. Commissioner Davis seconded the • motion, motion passed (7-0). June 7, 2007 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 5 35 • 9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a rezoning to amend the list of permitted uses included in the Planned Development District (PDD) zoning for 24.48 acres located at 1906 FM 158, and more generally located east of the Crescent Pointe Subdivision on Harvey Road -Highway 30. Case 07- 00500109 (JP) Jennifer Prochazka, Senior Planner presented the rezoning and recommended approval. Concerns stated by the Commission were regarding traf,~'~'f~f't~e area. • • Sherry Ellison, 2705 Brookway Drive, College S ioii;.<; - as. Ms. Ellison spoke of traffic concerns in the area and how it woul andle' uld the rezoning be approved. ~' ~~. Commissioner Sanford motioned to r ~ummen approval to ~C~ty council of the rezoning amendment as submittc'~3~, st , :: ~Commiss~on~r Schroeder seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0). ' 10. Public hearing, presentation, p«s~tt~le action, and dls ssion regarding the annual review of the Unified Developftt~nt` f~rdjnance (UD and the Comprehensive _,< Plan, including recent UDO amenduient~''~~gtie~te~l T ]~ amendments, and recent Comprehensive Plan amendments G~SC #(17 ~U0004 (CA) Molly Hitcl~~gck, Plan~~pg Adminisator presented the annual review of the Unified De~~~~~ent Oj~dinance and ~om~rehensive Plan changes. Ken F~ 31~~. Tran~p~rl~t~ i~~ ~Plann~x fresented the changes on the Traffic Impact . ~:: Study: r= ~~~ _ onica Morga itche~`Morgan, 511 University Drive, Suite 204, College S Texas. a Mown spoke to the portion of the UDO regarding the signs - standards':' and why there were concerns from the development community, "fhus~, concerns included what are considered the frontage or the front linea,Q~~~ge of a smaller building and the attached signage to that, as compared to ~~kiat is considered the front door of larger buildings, what is defined as the front door and how much attached signage is allowed based upon what that definition is. 11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. June 7, 2007 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5 36 • Commissioner Dictson suggested a future agenda item for discussion regarding the Meadow Creek Subdivision and Main Street homes and the lessons that could be learned from that development. 12. Adjourn. Commissioner Davis motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Sanford seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0). Meeting adjourned at 9:04 p.m. Approved: _~~~~. ij1f F John Nichols, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: • Lisa Lindgren, Staff 4~~sr~t~nt ` ~`_ Planning and Dev o ~~nt S~rvjGes . x ~:.:~ : ~~ ~a - ~; ~.; • June 7, 2007 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5 37 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning C~ Devtlopment Srrvirrs MINUTES Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Monday, dune 18, 2007, at 6:00 p.m. College Station Conference Center 1300 George Bush Drive Room 101 College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Sanford, Glenn Schroeder, and Harold Strong. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Bill Davis CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: CITY STAFF PRESENT: Staff Pla Jennifer Prochazka, Deputy City Mana Director Lance Simms, Planning Administr . Alan Gibbs, Graduate Civil Engineers Carol Fogle, Information Techn epresentat and Israel Koite and St s isa Lin 1 2. J istiansen, Marsha Hartl an on Schubert, Senior Planner Childers, Bob Cowell, Assistant ' chcock, for Assistant City Engineer n, Transportation Planner Ken n Coo , - lic Communications Mark Beal at 6:00 p.m. 3 items. ssion°on Consent Agenda Item 3.2 and Regular Agenda Item 5. a posting error Regular Agenda Item 5 would not be heard at the heard at the July 5, 2007, Planning and Zoning Commission r~ ~J Call the meeting Presentation, (JP) action and discussion on the Comprehensive Plan goal statements. Jennifer Prochazka, Senior Planner, introduced Gary Mitchell from Kendig Keast Collaborative. Mr. Mitchell gave an updated presentation regarding the Comprehensive Planning Goals. June 18, 2007 Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 38 The goals discussed during the presentation were as follows: •'• Community Character Neighborhood Integrity •'• Transportation • Growth Management & Capacity •'• Economic Development • Parks, Art & Leisure • Unique Community Assets •'• Utilities •'• Municipal Services • Community Facilities After the presentation from Mr. Mitchell discussion session regarding the goals for th 4. Presentation, possible action, and discus'~o~ the status of items within the P&Z Plan of W 5 Jason Schubert, Staff Planner, g updated was general discussion regarding borh and updates and items within that t 'c. Presentation, possible action and Plan. late to the . (JS) answer and fission on n of the Plan of Work. There section on the Plan of Work on the following item: Chapter 1 City of College Station Code of Ordinances, nified Deve ment Ordinance, regarding the permitted ecommunica facilities. The Planning and Zoning d approval on May 17, 2007, and the City ;ndme nimously on June 14, 2007. 6. ion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming p.m. ~ P&Z Workshop & Regular Meeting ~ College Station 0 p.m. ~ Joint P&Z and CPAC Workshop Meeting ~ College Center • July 19, 2007 ~ 6:00 p.m. ~ P&Z Workshop & Regular Meeting ~ College Station City Hall Chairman Nichols reviewed the upcoming meetings for the Planning and Zoning Commission. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member • may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific June 18, 2007 Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 39 • An Ordina ame Section of the locations o less • factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. No items were discussed. 8. Adjourn. Commissioner Sanford motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). ~ Meeting adjourned at '7:08 p.m. • • Approved: John Nichols, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff PIaY June 18, 2007 Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 40 MINUTES ~"~- CITY OP COLLEGE STATION Pla>arung d Drvrloprr+crrs Scrnirrs Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Monday, Tune 18, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. College Station Conference Center 1300 George Bush Drive Room 101 College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John N Sanford, Glenn Schroeder, and Harold Strong. • COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Bill Davis and CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: CITY STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Jennifer Prochazka, Deputy City Ma eI Director Lance Simms, Planning Adminl Alan Gibbs, Graduate Civil Engineers Car Fogle, Information Technology Repre Representatives Mark Beal and Israel Koite 2. 3. Christiansen, Marsha Schubert, Senior Planner r Bob Cowell, Assistant ~r Assistant City Engineer Pnsnortation Planner Ken ! Public Communications Lindgren. action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Aggieland Business ing of 7 lots on 19.114 acres located at 5942 Raymond Stotzer ted at the northwest corner of FM 60 and Jones Road in the Case # 07-00500118 (JS) 3.2 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Dove Crossing Phase 8, consisting of 51 lots on 10.799 acres, located at the intersection south of Graham Road and Alexandria Avenue. Case # 07-00500124 (JP) • 3.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Edelweiss Gartens Subdivision, Phase 10 consisting of 49 lots on 10.91 acres located on Eagle Avenue in the general vicinity of the northeast intersection of Eagle Avenue and Kleine Lane. Case # 07-00500125 (LB) June 18, 2007 Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 41 Crissy Ha Jason • 3.4 Consideration, discussion and possible action on a request for an absence from meetings. • Bill Davis ~ Workshop & Regular Meeting ~ June 18, 2007 Commissioner Christiansen motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Strong seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). • Regular Agenda 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items Agenda by Commission action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda. 5. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, a s io Pointe Ph. 2 being a Replat of Phase 2, k 1 of the consisting of 10 lots on 15.09 acres loca 1500 e vicinity of the southwest intersection of nt Parkway. Case #07-00500119 (LB) The item was pulled from the a due to a p July 5, 2007, Planning and Zoni fission 6. Public hearing, Greensworld St Subdivision Ph. South, and the intersea 00500117(JP) J presentation, poss a act di fission on a Final Plat for ~di ' ' n, Phase I, rep ots 1 R and 2R Greensworld fisting of 3. acres to ed at 1005 Earl Rudder Freeway enera Gated along a east side of Earl Rudder Freeway, south of arl R er Freeway and University Drive East. Case # 07- ~, Se lanner, p nted the Final Plat and recommended approval. from the Consent on a Plat for Crescent ;rescent to Subdivision field Par a general Parkway a Copperfield or and will be heard at the one spoke at 'motioned to approve the Replat as submitted by staff. ded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 7. Discussion o le action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire a a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual info ion or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Christiansen inquired about the floodplain issues discussed at the last meeting. Staff stated that the item would be on a future workshop agenda in August. Chairman Nichols encouraged everyone to begin to make a list of topics for next year's Plan of Work. • June 18, 2007 Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 42 • 8. Adjourn. Commissioner Sanford motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). Meeting adjourned at 7:19 p.m. U • Approved: John Nichols, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and June 18, 2007 Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 43 • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Lindsay Boyer, AICP, Staff Planner Report Date: June 1, 2007 Email: Iboyer@cstx.gov Meeting Date: June 18, 2007 Project Number: 07-00500119 Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Variance request to Section 8-1.2, Utility Easements of the Subdivision Regulations and a public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat being a Replat of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1,Phase 2 of the Crescent Pointe Subdivision consisting of 10 lots on 15.09 acres located at 1500 Copperfield Parkway in the general vicinity of the southwest intersection of Crescent Pointe Parkway and Copperfield Parkway. Applicant: Kling Engineering, engineer for the owner Staff Recommendations: If the variance request is granted, Staff recommends approval of the replat. Item Summary: This plat is a replat of the previously platted Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Phase 2, of Crescent Pointe. This replat subdivides 3 existing lots into 10 lots. The applicant is requesting a variance to the Subdivision Regulation requirements that Public Utility Easements be required along the rear of all lots. In considering a variance, the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings: • 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; 2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; 3. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and 4. That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The subject property is designated as Planned Development on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The plat includes property with frontage on University Drive East and Harvey Road, both major arterials, and Coppe~eld Parkway, a minor arterial. This property is part of the 30/60 Small Area Plan which identified this area for Mixed Use Development. In 2003, the Mixed Use Study reclassified this area as Planned Development. The 30/60 Plan listed a variety of uses that would be appropriate in this area: office, commercial, clean industrial, and higher density single family and multi-family housing. This plat is in compliance with the approved Master Plan and if the variance is approved, the City's Subdivision Regulations. 44 • Item Background: This property was annexed in 1979 and subsequently zoned M-1, Light Industrial. Phase 1 of Crescent Pointe was platted in 2005. The property was rezoned in 2005 to A-P, Administrative Professional. A Master Plan was approved on this property in 2003. In 2005, the Master Plan was approved again after the expiration of the previous plan. The current Preliminary Plat and most recent Final Plat were approved on September 7, 2006 Budgetary 8 Financial Summary: None Related Advisory Board Recommendations: N/A Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the preliminary plat. The Commission must first rule on the variance requests. The options regarding the variance requests are: ^ Approval ^ Denial If approved, the Commission can take action on the plat. The options regarding the replat are: ^ Approval ^ Denial Supporting Materials: 1. Small Area Map (SAM) and Aerial Map • 2. Application 3. Variance Request 4. Copy of Final Plat (provided in packet) C7 45 . STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Crissy Hartl, Staff Planner Report Date: June 25, 2007 Email: chart)@cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 5, 2007 Project Number: 07-00500127 Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a final plat being a replat of University Town Center Phase 1 consisting of 6 lots on 17.73 acres located at 800 University Drive East, generally located on the south side of University between Tarrow Street and Lincoln Avenue. Applicant: David Scarmardo, Owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the final plat as submitted. Item Summary: The applicant is pursuing a replat of the University Town Center Phase 1 subdivision in order to reflect the future ownership status of the commercial development. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The subject property is designated as Retail Regional on the Land Use Plan and University Drive is a major arterial on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. The replat is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Ordinance, and Subdivision Regulations. Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the City of College Station in 1956 • and is currently zoned C-1 General Commercial. The University Town Center area was platted in its current configuration in 2005 in preparation for the retail development that is currently under construction. Lots 26 and 3B are the only lots undeveloped in the University Town Center Phase 1 subdivision, although they have received site plan approval for commercial development in conjunction with the already developed lots. Budgetary 8 Financial Summary: None requested. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: Parks Board: Because this is a commercial replat, the Parks Board did not review this plat. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the final plat. The options regarding the final plat are: ^ Approval ^ Denial Supporting Materials: 1. Small Area Map (SAM) and Aerial Map 2. Application 3. Copy of Final Plat (provided in packet • 47 rn v • r CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLtrrnin,~. d Det~tlopn~enr Stnrirat FOR OFFICE 8fE L~ PiliZ CASE NO.: ,{~ _ DATE SUBMITTED; ~ 1~~~ 1. `, i--~, ~ FINAL PLAT APPLt~ATION • • -=~.. Check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending ^ Final ^ Vacating Replat I (ssoa.oo) ixaao.aol (saoa.oo) tsaoo.oo) ts6oa.ool• . •Inclu hearin~•iea Is this plat In the ETJ? ^ Yes ~ No - -_ - The following items must be submitted by an established filtnn deadline date for Pt.2 Cemm~~tctnn ~.,.,ei.~n~•r~.. MINIM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: I~ $300 - $fi00 Filing Fee (see above} OTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet ~~ ~1 ~! $100 Variance R uest to Subdivision eq egulabons (if applicable) 200 Development Permit Application Fee (if applicable). / $600.00 Infrastructure inspection Fee (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed} - I~Application completed in full. Copy of original deed restrictionslcovenants far replete (if applicable). l!//~~ Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) ~ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Two (2} copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). N/ Parkland Dedication requirement approved lay the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if aDalicablel. Date of Preapplication Conference: NAME OF SU9D1ViSION Crescent Pointe Phase 2 -Block 1 SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & lock) Ad'acen resce t Poin arkw Bo nd b C escent in a d Co erflekl Parkwa G' f ~ ~ (, ~~, I ..~ __ ~ G~ [. ~L l_ ~., APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAG€R'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name ! i t Enaineerina 8 Survevina _ Street Address 4101 5 Texas Av Suite A City State ~ Zip Code 7781)2 E-Mail Address feremvCdfkllnaena,corn Phone Number 979.846-8232 Fax Number 979-846-82 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (~1 owners must be identified. Please attach an addidona{ sheet for multiple owners): Name Crescent Pointe Hal 'n s Inc - manuel Glxkzin Jr President Street Address r _.- City Broa,~ _ State TX Zip Code 7TBQ2 E-Mail Address Phone Number 979-8468878 Fax Number 979-$4ta-07$3 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name ~m~as annlicant/flroiect manager Street Address State Zip Code Phone Number E-Mail Address Fax Number t or S ~' City Do any deed restrictions or paver, ,~s exist for this property? Yes ~ Nu • is thane s temporary blanket easement on this property? It so, please provide the Volume and Page # Acreage ~ Tctaf Property 18.10 Total # of Lots 10 R-tJ-W Acrosge Existing Use: Vacant (proposed Use: UtiliM Easements Number of lots 13y Zoning District 10 /A_P / /_ .Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot 8y Zoning District: / / I ! Fiaodpiain Acreag® A statement addressing any dlflerences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): V/~' • Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACRF„AGE: # of acres tp be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE 1N LIEU OF LAND; # of Singie-Family [.7weffing Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks 8 Recreation Board NOTE: DIG{TAL CC3PY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO F1L1NG. Requested Variances To Subdhrision Regulations & Reason For Same: ~//~' Requested Oversize Participation: iota! Linear Footage of Proposed Pu61ic: Streets Sidewalks Sanitary Sewer Lines _ Water Lines Ghannels Starm Sewers ' .._~___~ 6ike Lanes !Paths The applicant has prepared this application a»d certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits 8tfeahed herefa era true, correct, end complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of CoNege Station of the above-identified tine! plat end attests that this request does r+ot amend any covenants or restr~otions associated w/th this p/at. Signature and Title ----~~ ..~Gj sate 2 af' S • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Lindsay Boyer, AICP, Staff Planner Report Date: June 11, 2007 Email: Iboyer@cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 5, 2007 Project Number: 07-00500073 Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Variance request to Section 13-C, Lot Width and 12-1.3, Relation to Adjoining Street Systems of the Subdivision Regulations and a presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plat for Peach Crossing Subdivision, Phase 2 consisting of 4 lots on 29.56 acres located at 1706 Peach Creek Road just east of the Speedway on Peach Creek Road, at its intersection with Peach Creek Cut-Off in the City's Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction. Applicant: Mark Homeyer, Property Owner/Developer Staff Recommendations: If the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the variance requests, Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat. Item Summary: This item is for the consideration of a Preliminary Plat for 29.56 acres in the City's ETJ. The subject property is being platted as 4 residential lots. The property is located at the end of Freestone Drive where Phase One of Peach Creek ends. Approval of this Preliminary Plat requires approval of a variance to the lot width requirement. The City's Subdivision Regulations, Section 13-C, require a minimum 100-ft. width for lots in the • ETJ. Lots 10, 11, 12 and 13 of Block 3, all of which are located in Phase Two at the end of the cul-de-sac of Freestone Drive, are less than 100 feet in width. These lots do, however, meet the County minimum lot width of 70 feet. Additionally, the applicant is requesting a variance to street systems in Section 12-1.3. The subdivision regulations require that property that is platting must make provisions for the proper projection of streets into neighboring unplatted areas. In considering a variance, the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings: 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; 2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; 3. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and 4. That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan identifies this property for Rural Residential development. However, the City has no authority over land use in the ETJ. Item Background: The subject property came into the City's Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) in 1992. Freestone Drive, which is classified as a residential street, will be extended to these • 50 • properties. Freestone drive is a residential street from Peach Creek Phase One consisting of 48 residential lots that was approved by the Commission on September of 2003. Budgetary & Financial Summary: N/A Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the preliminary plat. The Commission must first rule on the variance requests. The options regarding the variance requests are: ^ Approval ^ Denial If approved, the Commission can take action on the preliminary plat. The options regarding the preliminary plat are: ^ Approval ^ Denial Supporting Materials: 1. Small Area Map (SAM) and Aerial Map 2. Application 3. Copy of Preliminary Plat (provided in packet) 4. Variance Request Letter • • 51 N . ~7 FOR OFFICE USE~~{L.Y PdZ CASE f~10.: /~~ /J' DATE SUBMITTED:~"'~~~ 7 ~~;~. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION The following items must be submitted by an established fling deadline date for P 8~ Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Filing Fee of $400.00. Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) Application completed in full. Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed. Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). Date of Preapplication Conference:, NAME OF SUBDIVISION Pe~c ~. CI'ossiKa - P~.si ~wo ~PECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION 2q . Sfe ,dom. _s 6~:~..~ P«~_4 C.~S,~s Sc.b~.~;s.a-. APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project}: Name /~ „k ffnr1G~{.r Street Address loo Pe.a~~. Cross :mss Or; v~ City Co ~l'e~tc ~a`tio~-. State 7'X Zip Code 77£~yS" E-Mail Address, Phone Number 979-73q-fe27s Fax Number PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name ~t/I.aik ~.~c.Vr_,r Street Address lfeoo P~4rl~ C,~~«k Dr,~~ City Co ~~e.; c S~-~r'o~-, State ~~__ Zip Code 77k 4S E-Mail Address Phone Number 979-739- 6275- Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name 1-~,,.,~urr E..~ ~--ee~~.,~ ~Tir/c ~ c'n..~~c-~- ~ S-frvre. (~~r~.cr Street Address P.©, ~x 2.q 452.'7` City Lewisc.~ ~~t • State Zip Code ,7502 E-Mail Address 5~~ ~~. ~sa. Phone Number q72-gOfd-495 _ Fax Number -972- `lofo -`hi87 gl~vr-nEYER ~ ~-~d~E!'FK-ENGf~R In'GrCO.~-. 6/13/03 1 of 4 Total Acres Of Subdivision 2q ~ S6 R-O-W Acreage Q,,_~{ f Total # Of Lots ~ • Number Of Lots By Zoning District N~_ /_ / / ~.~ _Ly~ Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: V/~ / ~//,~4 / ~/ NA_/ Floodplain Acreage !~~ Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? /I'/f~ A statement addressing any differences between the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan (if applicable) //Q Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same Ser_ vt ~,~,o~~ Requested oversize participation _~/Q Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of Acres to be dedicated "-' # of acres in floodplain ""'- # of acres in detention OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: ' # of acres in greenways "-' # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ ` "- (date) Approved by Parks ~ Recreation Board The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above identified plat and attests that all respective owners have been identified on this application. Signature and ~tle a s/ 7~0 '7 Date 6/13/03 2 of 4 • Section 12 -1.3 To allow the termination of Freestone Drive without providing for the projection of streets into unplatted properties. Two of the three adjoining properties have ares that are located within the 100 year flood plain. As a result the adjacent properties may never develop in these areas. Section 13.C To allow a 70' lot width in lieu of the required 100' lot width per the ordinance. However, the actual length of lot frontage at the right-of-way is 109.96` for both lots. There are two existing ponds that would require filling and regrading if Freestone Drive is extended beyond the point shown on the plat. In order to keep a natural rural look, I am proposing to improve the existing gravel drive to provide access to lots 11 and 12. a • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Sr. Planner Report Date: June 26, 2007 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 5, 2007 Project Number: 07-00500129 Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Lots 9A-R 8 9B-R, Block 9 of The Villages of Indian Lakes Phase I, being a replat of Lot 9, Block 9 into two residential lots on 3.245 acres, located on Osage Trail Drive, off of Indian Lakes Drive ~ Chaco Canyon Drive, approximately'/, mile outside the southern edge of College Station, within the City's Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Applicant: Travis Martinek, agent for Smiling Mallard Development, LTD., property owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. ETJ Plats -Brazos County's comments and recommendations: None Item Summary:~This item is for consideration of a Final Plat of Lot 9A-R and 96-R, Block 9, approximately 1.9 and 1.3 acres respectively, and being a replat of Lot 9, Block 9 of the Villages of Indian Lakes Phase I. The lots take access to Osage Trail Drive. In order to accommodate a septic system on Lot 96-R, the Landscape Conservation Easement has been reduced to fifty feet in width. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: Indian Lakes is in College Station's ETJ. The Land • Use Plan shows most of the land to be developed at a rural density (very low density residential development with agricultural and support uses), however, the City does not control land use in the ETJ. Access to this property is from Indian Lakes Drive, a major collector on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. Item Background: A Master Development Plan was approved for the Indian Lakes Subdivision in 2002. Phase I was platted in 2004. A number of development phases have been platted since that time. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the Final Plat. The options regarding the Final plat are: ^ Approval ^ Denial NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle: 6-19-07 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 7-5-07 Response Received: None as of date of staff report. Supporting Materials: 1. Small Area Map (SAM) and Aerial Map 2. Application • 3. Copy of Replat (provided in packet) 54 cc f ~ FOR OFFICE lJ8E N ,! PiZ CASE NOS ~' ~~ '~ a-Te sue~ilTrEa: -~ ~ CT1Y OF COIW,EGE ST'ATtON ~ Plaailn~ d~Ow~,nau 5rrvi~a . ~ ~~ FINAL PLAT APPLICATION ~ • (check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending ^ Final ^ vacaang ®Replat t~oo.oo) ti3ao.oo) t;~4ao.oo) ts~oo.oo) tsaoo.oor "Indudes public hauinp fse Is thls plat in ate ETJ? ^ Yes ^ No ~ ~~. rvuvwmy ~wms muse oe suomntea ay an established filing deadline date for PdZ Commission consid~ratton. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: X $300 - $600 Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheep $100 Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations (if applicable) $200 Development Permit Application Fed (it applicable). $600.00 Infrastructure Inspection Fee (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) X Application completed in full. Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). X Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) X Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ~ A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (If applicable). Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks ~ Recreation Board, please provide proof of Date of Preapplicaaon Gonference: NAME OF SUBDIVISION Universfi- Town Center Phase One SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot b Black) Lors 1A. 1B. 2 8 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name _ David Scannarclo -Sahara Realty Groan i +ei _ game ac mm~arfv owner nforrnati~n halnw Street Address State Zip Code Phone Number E-Mail Address Fax Number City PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION {,~„ owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for muRiple owners): Name David 8camnarde -Sahara Realty Groan Ltd Street Address 1seB N. Hartne~r I Pe City Brvan State _ ,_~,_,_ Zip Code 778Q5 E-Mail Address Phone Number ~Tt&7209 Fax Number sr9.82z.t~e3 ARCHITECT OR ENt3fNEER'S INFORMATION: Name _ Klino Enainesrine ~ ~~~rv~~ • Street Address 4101 S Texas ewe .ire ~ City __-__ ,@lyan State _ TX Zip Code „__ 778D2 E-Mail Address .,ter„ Phone Number __079.84e.8212 Fax Number 1 ofs C O • • Do any deed restrtdions or covenants exist for this property? Yes X No Is ihere a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so. please provide the Volume _,_p($ and Page # Acreage ~ Total Property 17,73 Total # of Lots 6 R-O-W Acxeage Na Existing Use: retail / commercial Proposed Use: retail_/commercial Number of Lots By Zoning Dlstrid ~ /~_ Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning Distrid: _. Na / / / Floodplain Acreage 0.81 ac. A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan andlor Preliminary Plat (if applicable): Na Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: n/a Requested Oversize PartiGpation: Na Total Unear Footage of Proposed Public: ,N~a ,_ Streets Sidewalks Sanitary Sewer Lines Water Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Parldand Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: Na # of acres to be dedicated + $ development tee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU 4F LAND: # of Single-Famify Dweilfrlg Units X $556 =$ __,_,__,,,,_ (date) Approved by Parks $ Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. nre appr>oarr has prepared this app~catiarr and aartl~es that nre rags stated nene-n and exhibblts aaaaear hereto sine true, correct, aril complete. fie undersigned hereby requests apprrovaf by the Cxy of college S1tatYon of the above-kiant111ed final p/at and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or rr3sMetions associafed with this plat • igna a le J ~ ~ Date 2 aP6 i STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Sr. Planner Report Date: June 27, 2007 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 5, 2007 Project Number: 07-00500134 Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan -Land Use Plan from Regional Retail and Floodplains ~ Streams to Redevelopment for 3.956 acres located at 1502 Texas Avenue South. Applicant: Bright Light Corporation, property owner Staff Recommendations: Based on recent direction by the Planning & Zoning Commission, staff recommends denial of the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan, which would remove a portion of the Floodplain & Streams designation on the property, prior to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) approving a recently submitted Letter Of Map Revision (LOMR) that may alter the location of the 100-year floodplain on this and adjacent properties. At such time that the LOMR is approved by FEMA, staff will reconsider the request to amend the Land Use Plan. Item Summary: The applicant has requested to amend the Land Use Plan to reflect the subject property as Redevelopment in order to redevelop the property as a mixed-use development. The current Regional Retail designation is not consistent with the proposed Planned Mixed-Use District (P-MUD) zoning. Generally, mixed-use developments and P-MUD zoning are appropriate in areas shown as either Planned Development or Redevelopment on the Land Use Plan, depending on specific site characteristics. In this case, staff believes that Redevelopment is the more appropriate designation. In addition, the requested amendment alters the location of the Floodplains 8~ Streams designation on the property. The requested amendment is consistent with a recent study that has been submitted to FEMA for review. Staff has not yet received comment or approval of the LOMR from FEMA. The property to the north, across Milliff Street, is designated as Regional Retail and Floodplain 8~ Streams and is developed as Texas Avenue Crossing, a retail shopping center. The property to the east, across Texas Avenue, is designated as Redevelopment and is currently redeveloping as Central Station (formerly Culpepper Plaza). The property to the south is designated as Regional Retail and is undeveloped at this time. The property to the west is shown as Floodplain & Streams and is developed as the Meridian Apartments, Phase 1. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: This request is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan defines Redevelopment as "currently developed areas which will experience redevelopment as a result of increased land value. Redevelopment will occur as mixed use developments as described (below). Mixed-use redevelopment areas are projected for areas close to the University, such as Northgate." Mixed-Use is defined as "areas which encourage mixing of compatible land uses such as retail/commercial, office, parks, multi-family, and attached single-family. These uses are developed together in a manner that allows interaction between the uses and that allows each use to support the other uses. The • residential uses provide the patrons for the office and commercial uses. The layout of these 57 • land uses must take into consideration pedestrian linkages, landscape buffers between the uses, shared site improvements and vehicular circulation. The success of these mixed use areas is directly related to the sensitive master planning of the site layout." The Comprehensive Plan defines Floodplain 8~ Streams as "the 100-year floodplain as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), plus additional areas reserved for open space." Since this area is currently developed, staff does not believe that any additional areas, beyond the 100-year floodplain, need to be designated as Floodplains & Streams. As stated previously, FEMA is currently reviewing a recently submitted LOMR that proposes to relocate the 100-year floodplain on this and adjacent properties. The subject property is located adjacent to and takes access to Texas Avenue, a major arterial on the City's Thoroughfare Plan, and Milliff Street a local street. Item Background: The property was annexed into the City limits in 1956 and was included in the Redmond Terrace -First Installment Plat in 1957. The property is zoned C-1 General Commercial and was developed as a hotel many years ago. The Redmond Terrace shopping center was redeveloped as Texas Avenue Crossing in 2003. Culpepper Plaza, located across Texas Avenue, is currently being redeveloped as the Central Station shopping center. The property to the south was cleared for future redevelopment last year. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: N/A • Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of Comprehensive Plan amendments, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval of the amendment as submitted; 2. Recommend denial; 3. Table indefinitely; or, 4. Defer action to a specified date. NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 6-18-07 and 7-9-07 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 7-5-07 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 7-26-07 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 13 Response Received: I have received two inquiry phone calls and one phone call in opposition. Supporting Materials: 1. Small Area Map (SAM) and Aerial Map 2. Application 3. Land Use Plan Map (provided in packet) • 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Supporting Information 58 0 co • .- CITY 0I? COLLEGE STATION Plon»i~ d Aerrlopaonu S~rvica C Foa o~cE u~sE 1pN~v case No. ,~, (l1-- ~-L Date Sutxnlttea~ ~'~-(' ~'6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION i i• ,~ i (Check all applicable) x Land Use Amendment D Thoroughfare Amendment O alignment /location ^ classification The following items must be submitted by the established deadline dates for consideration: X Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" X 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Present zoning of property and zoning classification of all abutting properties; c. Current land use plan classification and proposed land use plan changes; d. Current land use classification of all abutting property; e. Current and proposed thoroughfare alignments x General location and address of property; x Total acres of property; and x All applicable Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request form(s) completed in full. The following information must be completed before an application is accepted for review. APPLICANT INFORMATION: (if different from owner, ~ Name: Brinht I.iaht Corp~fation Street Address: 15Q2 Soul City: Colteoe Station Phone Number.979-69~-9891 ~ complete affidavit shall be required) E-mail: dnate11514Ca4verizon.net .h Texas Avenue State: Texas Zip Code: 77840 Fax Number: 979-696-1334 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: ~ Name:A "o~,ht Liq~,~oroaration E-mail: t Street Address: .same as above City: State: Z!p Code• - j Phone Number. Fax Number. ~ • r Page 3 of 4 0 0 • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM The following is required if an amendment to the Land Use Plan is requested. Based on the nature and extent of the requested amendment, additional studies may be required. Attach additional sheets if necessary. Current Land Use Plan designation: Retail Regional & 1=loodglalNStreams Requested land Use Plan designation: Redevelopment Explain the reason for this land Use Plan amendment: See attached letter Identify what conditions have changed to warrant a change in the land use plan designation: See attached letter • How does the requested land use designation further the goals and objectives of the City of College Station Comprehensive Plan? See attached letter Explain why the requested land use designation is more appropriate than the existing designation. Ses attached letter applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached ~to are titre and comact. Signature and ,,,.,,r _ gate • lags 4 of 4 MITCHELL • MORGAN City of College Station June 15, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission City Council c/o Development Services 1101 S. Texas Ave. College Station, Texas 77840 Re: Revised Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Redmond Terrace First Installment - A Portion of the Community Shopping Center (Reserve Tract) - Vol 188, Page 295, JE Scott League A-50 (Ramada Inn property) Dear Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council: We are currently considering the purchase and redevelopment of the Ramada Inn site on Texas Avenue. This site is located on the west side of Texas Avenue, just south of the Miliff and Texas Avenue intersection. • Why request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment? Our desire is to redevelop the site into an urban mixed use development with the mix of uses consisting of retail, restaurants, office and residential attached housing. In order to accomplish this concept, we must first amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan because the current zoning and land use do not allow this concept to occur on this land. Currently, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (Exhibit A -first panel) on this tract reflects Floodplain & Streams and Regional Retail as the most appropriate land uses. In order to permit the desired mixed use concept, staff has indicated that the land use category most appropriate at this location is Redevelopment. According to the Comprehensive Plan, Redevelopment is defined as "Currently developed areas which will experience redevelopment as a result of increased land value. Redevelopment will occur as mixed use developments as described previously. Mixed-use redevelopment areas are projected for areas close to the University, such as Northgate." Therefore, our request before you is to amend the Comprehensive Plan for this tract from Floodplain ~ Streams and Regional Retail to Redevelopment. What are the changed conditions that warrant a Comprehensive Plan Amendment? Floodplain & Streams Approximately 5 years ago, Texas A&M University designed and constructed a detention pond on the ?AMU polo fields, just north of New Main Drive. This pond subsequently decreased the flood elevations within Wolf Pen Creek, Tributary C which originates at University Drive near Texas Avenue and travels through the Texas A8M golf course, behind the Bed, Bath and Beyond shopping center and behind the Ramada Inn tract where it joins with Wolf Pen Creek Main just south of Redmond Drive. The current • owner of the Meridian Apartments commissioned a hydrology and hydraulic study to ~~ ~ 3 •U t~ ' ~~ ~ / 511 UNIVERSITY DRIVE EAST, SUI7E 204 • COLLEGE S~TION, TX 77840 • T 979.260.6963 • F 979.260.3564 ~ ' ~ V ~~ CIVIL ENGINEERING HYDRAULICS HYDROLO~'1• UTILITIES STREETS $ITE PLANS SUBDIVISIONS /~ - info®mitchellandmorgan.com www.mitchellandmorgan.com .}}yr`' • determine the effects of the TAMU detention on their property. The effect was a reduction of the 100-year water surface elevation through this creek. Exhibit A -panel 2 shows the effects of the detention through the area. The grey is the current regulatory 100-year floodplain, while the light blue is the new 100-year floodplain based upon the existing conditions on the TAMU campus. The hydraulic study to support the adoption of this new 100-year floodplain line is currently under review with FEMA. It is anticipated that FEMA will be complete with their review in approximately 2-3 months. Given the new location of the 100-year floodplain, there is only a small comer of the Ramada Inn tract that is inundated with floodwaters during a 100-year storm event. The small comer that is still inundated based upon the revised study is also located within a 45 foot wide drainage easement and therefore undevelopable. We have retained the 45 foot drainage easement as Fioodplain & Sfreams on the Comprehensive Plan amendment request. Regional Retail With the increased number of new hotels in the area, the existing Ramada Inn is experiencing a significant amount of competition. It appears that this property, given its' age, its' location near TAMU, the recent adjacent Texas Avenue reconstruction project and the current hotel occupancy levels, make it prime for redevelopment. The question at hand is what type of redevelopment should occur on the property and is Regional Retail still the most appropriate land use category for this site. The City has indicated a desire to encourage development of student housing closer to campus in an effort to reduce vehicle trips per day on the city transportation system. With a TAMU student • population of nearly 45,000 and the possibility of that number climbing, it is important to keep these students near campus where alternative modes of transportation are easy to utilize. At the same time, the City has expressed a desire to encourage retail along Texas Avenue and other major transportation corridors in an effort to minimize traffic impacts from retailers on neighborhoods. With this location both near campus and near an older residential neighborhood, it makes sense that a mixed use development which allows both uses is desirable. Unfortunately, Regional Retail does not allow this mix of uses, but the land use category of Redevelopment does allow this development type. How does the proposed Land Use change further the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? The use as proposed with a developer having a strong track record in the development of student housing is an exciting use. There are several Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives that would be positively impacted with this development at this location. Itemized below are several of the goals and objective statements from the current Plan that appear to be furthered: • 2 s2 • Land Use Goals and Oblectives Goal #1 -College Station should continue to provide and locate adequate amounts of appropriately zoned land for ail necessary types of land uses in an efficient, convenient, harmonious, and ecologically sound manner. • Objective 1.3 -College Station should continue to avoid strip commercial development (such as that along Texas Avenue) and encourage centralized commercial development which encourages multi-modal access. Goal #2 -College Station should continue to provide for the orderly development of existing and future land uses. • Objective 2.4 -College Station should develop zoning districts which allow a mixture of residential and non-residential uses which complement and support each other with appropriate buffering. Goal #3 -College Station should continue to protect, preserve and enhance existing and future neighborhoods. • Objective 3.3 -College Station should encourage mixed-use developments which provide for an appropriate combination of residential and support uses. • Transaortatlon Goals and Objectives Goal #1 -College Station should balance the development of-all modes of transportation to assure the fast, convenient, efficient and safe movement of people and goods to, from, and within the community while continuing to protect the integrity of neighborhoods. • Objective 1.8 -College Station should work to encourage the reduction of travel through demand management techniques systems for such as carpooling and van-pooling. Goal #Z -College Station should continue to ensure the development, maintenance and operation of a safe, efficient and effective transportation system to serve the City. • Objective 2.1 -College Station should continue to develop and maintain a transportation planning process which addresses long range needs and emphasizes short and mid-range problem-solving. 63 • Goal #5 -College Statbn should provide for the safe movement of pedestrians and bicyclists within College Station. • Objective 5.1 -College Station should continue to encourage the use of alternate modes of transportation to reduce air pollution and traffic congestion, including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian. Goal #6 -College Station should continue to work with the Brazos valley Transit System and the University to provide for efficient bus service within the community. • Objective 6.1 -College Station should encourage the use of transit to reduce air pollution and traffic congestion by supporting things such as: a. Mass transit facilities for existing and new developments. b. Texas A 8~ M University Shuttle and Urban Trolley transit service between all residential areas, the University, retail and employment centers, and between regional destinations • Objective 6.2 -College Station should examine and promote land use concepts which enhance transit usage. Why is this Land Use more appropriate than the existing Land Use? • There are certain physical and economic constraints limiting the redevelopment of this property solely for retail uses, which is that allowed by the current land use category. Some of these constraints are as follows: • The depth of the property limits the retail uses to smaller tenants. Bigger box retailers would require more than 150 feet of depth with several rows of parking in front, similar to the Culpepper center across Texas Avenue and the Bed, Bath ~ Beyond shopping center next door. A parking layout similar to those developments cannot be accommodated on the existing site, meet the current site development requirements, and not push back to Redmond Drive encouraging retail traffic through the neighborhood. • Because of the proposed development on the adjacent comer lot on the south (comer of Redmond and Texas -former Summit gas station) and Jack-in-the- Box on the north, there is limited exposure to much of the developable envelope of the property. Evidence that exposure and visibility to a retailer is of utmost importance is the signficant expenditure made by the owner of the Post Oak Square Center containing Toys-R-Us. Several years ago a Grandy's restaurant stood at the ftont of that center on top of a "knoll". Retailers would not lease the spaces behind that "knoll" and the Grandy's restaurant, so the owner razed the building and regraded and repaved almost'/2 of the parking lot to cut down the "knoll" and increase visibility to the lease spaces in the center of that complex. • 4 64 • • • • The razing of the existing five story hotel building is not economically feasible. In addition to the cost of acquisition and the construction of a new building at that location, there would be demolition costs, costs associated with the buy out of two long term leases on the roof, and the loss of income during planning and construction of a new facility. These costs to redevelop the site for retail uses, which would end up with poor visibility (behind Jack-in-the-Box), far exceeds the returns anticipated from the potential retail development. The highest and best use of the property is that of a mixed use or a high end hotel. The economic feasibility of a high end hotel at this site is questionable as there are more appealing sites available for such uses. Under these circumstances, the hotel will continue to be used in its current condition and continue the downward slide; or sit empty until another use becomes economically feasible. We believe that a mixed use urban development with a ground floor retail component anchoring an innovative student housing redevelopment this close to TAMU is the most appropriate and more importantly a very exciting land use for this property. We appreciate your consideration of our request and if you have any questions please feel free to call 260-6963. Veronica J.B.UUIon Managing Partner / ~-~ t E. Cc: Paul Thrower, Megaclose, USA Tom Keenan, TCK Realty Corp. Jerry Tipps, RS8~J, Inc. Chuck Ellison, Ellison Law file 5 65 • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Sr. Planner Report Date: June 27, 2007 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 5, 2007 Project Number: 07-00500130 Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a rezoning from C-1 General Commercial to P-MUD Planned Mixed Use District and A-O Agricultural Open for 3.956 acres located at 1502 Texas Avenue South. Applicant: Veronica Morgan, P.E., Mitchell & Morgan, LLP, agent for Bright Light Corporation, property owner Staff Recommendation -Rezoning: The applicant has requested that the Land Use Plan be amended to re-designate this property from Regional Retail and Floodplains & Streams to Redevelopment. That request will be considered at the July 26, 2007 City Council meeting. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is reviewing a recently submitted Letter Of Map Revision (LOMR) that may alter the location of the 100-year floodplain on this and adjacent properties. At such time that the LOMR is approved by FEMA and the Land Use Plan is amended to reflect Redevelopment on the subject property, staff will recommend approval of the Planned Mixed-Use District (P-MUD) rezoning request on this tract. Staff Recommendation -Concept Plan: Staff recommends approval of the Concept Plan with the condition that the ground floor of all structures on site be developed solely for commercial . use. Item Summary: The applicant has requested a P-MUD zoning in order to redevelop the property as a mixed-use development that will include ground floor retail, restaurants, office and residential attached housing (including both dormitories and multi-family uses), although, any of the uses included in the P-MUD zoning district would be permitted. The applicant is also proposing to rezone the property that is anticipated to remain 100-year floodplain with the LOMR approval to A-O Agricultural Open. P-MUD zoning requires that both residential and non-residential land uses constitute at least 20% of the overall land uses in the mixed-use development. The remaining 60% may be any combination of residential or non-residential land uses. With the proposed 37,000 square feet of retail, the residential component cannot exceed 148,000 square feet to ensure an adequate mixing of uses. The exact area of each use will be reviewed and evaluated with the site plan and building permit applications. The property to the north, across Milliff Street, is zoned C-1 General Commercial and is developed as the Texas Avenue Crossing shopping center. The property to the east, across Texas Avenue, is zoned C-1 General Commercial and RDD Redevelopment District and is redeveloping as the Central Station shopping center. The property to the south is vacant and zoned C-1 General Commercial. The Meridian Apartments, zoned R-6 Multi-Family High Density, and two single-family homes, zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential, area located to the west. As with any redevelopment on this site, but particularly multi-family, staff has concerns with the traffic flow to and from the site because of potential cut-through traffic in the Redmond Terrace neighborhood to the west. 66 • • • As a requirement of the of the P-MUD zoning request, the applicant has submitted a Purpose and Intent Statement for the proposed zoning, as well as a Concept Plan. Purpose and Intent Statement: "Our desire is to redevelop the site into an urban mixed use development with the mix of uses consisting of retail, restaurants, office and residential attached housing." Concept Plan: The Concept Plan is intended to be more conceptual in nature and has not been reviewed for overall site plan compliance. The applicant has not requested any modifications to our standards. The existing hotel tower will remain and be refurbished and "re-skinned" for use as a student dormitory. That structure is currently 5 stories tall and is proposed to remain at this height. A new structure is proposed that will adjoin the existing hotel tower and will contain ground floor commercial and multi-family units above it. The applicant has stated that the proposed building height will not exceed 150 feet. The Concept Plan shows the relocation of one of the existing driveways to Texas Avenue and eliminating the other. Staff believes that both of these changes are positive for the site and for access management on Texas Avenue. Additional parking is intended to be provided on a near-by site already zoned for apartment use. The City's development regulations permit off-site parking. This will be reviewed in more detail during the site plan process. The Concept Plan includes amenities that are proposed in an existing Public Utility Easement. The applicant intends to relocate the existing utilities and request abandonment of the easement to allow for the amenities to be constructed. Bike trails are proposed on site that may connect to a future hike and bike system The Unified Development Ordinances provides the following review criteria for PDD and P-MUD Concept Plans: 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; a. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, s~ • or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The applicant has requested that the property be designated as Redevelopment on the Land Use Plan. This request is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on July 26, 2007. Texas Avenue is designated as a major arterial on the City's Thoroughfare Plan and Milliff Street and Redmond Drive are considered local streets. This request is consistent with the City's policy of locating student housing in close proximity to Texas A&M University. Locating student housing close to the University reduces the demand on transportation systems and encourages the use of other modes of transportation, such as biking and walking. This request is also constant with the City's desire to see mixed-use deve-opment near to the University. Item Background: The property was annexed into the City limits in 1956 and was included in the Redmond Terrace -First Installment Plat in 1957. The property is zoned C-1 General Commercial and was developed as a hotel many years ago. The Redmond Terrace shopping center was redeveloped as Texas Avenue Crossing in 2003. Culpepper Plaza, located across Texas Avenue, is currently being redeveloped as the Central • Station shopping center. The property to the south was cleared for future redevelopment last year. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will review the Concept Plan at their July 17th meeting and will forward a recommendation to the City Council. Because of the size of the site and the number of residential units proposed, the Parks and Recreation Department Staff will recommend that fee-in-lieu of land dedication be accepted. Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted; 2. Recommend approval of rezoning with specific site conditions; 3. Recommend denial; 4. Table indefinitely; or, 5. Defer action to a specified date. NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 6-18-07 and 7-9-07 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 7-5-07 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 7-26-07 • 68 • Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 13 Response Received: I have received several inquiry phone calls and one call in opposition. The individual that is opposed to the development cited concerns of current traffic congestion and a concern of increased traffic through the adjacent neighborhood. Supporting Materials: 1. Small Area Map (SAM) and Aerial Map 2. Application 3. Supporting Information 4. Copy of Rezoning Map (provided in packet) 5. Copy of Concept Plan (provided in packet) • • 69 ~rJ U ti ~ ~ ~ u 1 Yv~~4~~ ~\ ~ ULWA E CL ~ °'? ~ b $a ~ ~ W ~iJ Q- - aZ'~ivv~~`, ~ O `uo \ ~ ~~'~c~u ~ Jg~2` \~ ~, 3c°~~~c~i~Y `~ •o~ ll) ~.~ /,~ ,P ~ ~ N M t ~ ~ ? ~ ~s 1 1 I 0 \ ~~9~\°~cD ~~~ ~ ~' N °O' w ~ZZZO~Y ~~\ ~ •~~ M O ~ ^^,~a wryy ~ ry ~~~ M ~ Q 0 ,~~ c ~, wry d ~ ~ ~~ n n (~ ~ aci y tR (Q ~-f V' ~~ ~, a~i ~ V ~ ~oOc i~ ~ i ~ "- ~ ` N `N > ~ E ' L '~ _ m 'c ~ ,~ o Lnn n-nn1 d .f0 ~ v u 'u °~ u L °0t1 ~ FEF m~ ~ ~ x v m ^' ~ av c 1OL~~ t-J CyJ _ m u ~ c c r ~ t L f0 - N C C i-.L yn`~ arna~3vmm Lu-J - JSU~~a C. / O ti {\ ~ ~y, r ~ .. I..,l `~r`, `S ~ ~I 1 cl ? ~ ~ ~ Z ~~,~% U P r.. a ~ o 0 ~' `?oo _ N ~~~~ ~ zo ~ ~ ~'\`` o O~ 1~0 V D ~~\°°` ~ r LL p O~ N /~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~_ D e ~~ ~~i N 1 '~~ s00 117 ~~ ~ \2°~ ~ \ O `~ v soy ~ oo ~ \ ~ yo eir M a cn i a ~ Ii W_ M °` 00~°- e N M `r ~tr~~QUU w ~ r" ~/ ~ r oti oe y ti ~ F- `a °<<` \\ ~ o~ ~P ``° \\ r ~ rv c ~ \ 1 ~ Y : ~T~' `~J t~ y O < c0 ~ vcc \\~O °°~` N ~ N T B a`e` N `~` 7 ~ ~ - ` ~ ~l~ ° ~' 3' `a< \~~ e°~4i ~ \ tD ~ \v~ N 009 ~ `c' .c m m rn ~ Z'-""11~"~•~~l ~ y r -t O 0 ~~ `ei I~ 00 Fag[ IOS~ ° p) ~ \. °, ~ ~ ~ ~ o N QQIY~~ T i ~..,, ., ~ r~ 4.'~ ~ • FOR ICE USE ONLY CASE NO ' DATE SUBMITTED CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning dDsralopnrno Sen~icrr ZONING MAP AMENDIUIENT REZONING APPLICATION G~j i• MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS tf a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Councli, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with pemnisston of the Planning & Zoning Commission or City Council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: x Appiigtion completed in full. ~x_ $500 Application fee _x Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights-of--way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. x_ Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lat & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). _,x_ The Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. A CAD (dxf/dwg) or GIS (shpt' digital file maybe required for more complex rezoning requests. Date of Required PreappilCation Conference: Mav 30.2007 APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: Name Mitchell 8~ Moroan. LLP c/o Veronica J B Morgan P E _ _ Street Address 511 University Drive ast Su a 204 ~ - City Cotleae Station State Texas Zip Code 77840 E-Mail Address y~rnitchellandmoraan com - .,_~._. Phone Number 979-260»6963 Fax Number _ 979-260-3564 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name BnAht Ljght Corso ion Street Address ~ 502 South Texas Avenue City Collgae Station State ~I~~ Zip Code _ 77840 E-Mail Address dDatel1514(aZy,net Phone Number 979-693-9891 x701 Fax Number _ 979-698-1334 • This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated 11/22/1,9, 1 and recorded in Volume _ 188 .Page 2..~~.._. of the Brazos County Deed Records. General Location of Property: located on tt~e east side of Texas Avenue anc~roxirrt~tgly,~ feet ~pu~h of the l~tersection of Miliff Drive and Texas Avenue :': Page 7 of 2 Address of Property; • Legal description: Redmond 'C~q~ Ftrst Ind Ilment - A Portion of thg Coo~munlty ~ionolna,Cdntsr ~es~rve tact -x/01 188. f~,ae 295 JE ScottLeaaue A•50 Acreage - Total Prop®rty: _ ~.~56 acres - Existing Zoning: _ __ ~1 - Gengrai Commsrcla( Proposed Zoning: PDD - Plann~~, De~relo mg_,~„nt_ Present Use of Property; Rote( proposed Use of Property: Mixe_ d Use; R$teil/Aoartmentg(Dormitorv Rr:~4NING 5UPP4RTING INFORMATION • • 1,) L(st the changed or changing conditions In the araa or in the City which make this zUne change necessary. See attached. letter 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is In accgrdance with the Corr~prahensive Pian. !f it is not. explain why the Pian Is Incorrect. We currently have a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dendin4 with the ri;y We re antici at.~ja that this Comprehensive Plan amendment w111 be approved If that is the case this rezonin4 would bQ In comolian~ with the Comprehensive Plan 3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change. See at~echeci (after f ~' Signs#ure of Owner (or agsn or applicant The applicant has prepared this applicaflon and supporting Information and certifies tl~ac the facts stated herein and Qxhibits atfachsd hereto are true and correct. l1~' APPLICATION IS FII:EO BY ANYONE tDTHER THAN TH,E 011+TJER OF THE Pt;OPFRTY, APPLICATION) MUST BE ACCOMPANIBD BYA Ppth'ER pF ATTDRNlEY STAT~h1ENJT FROM THE Obti'1VER. ~ ~~ Date ~~ N»y:u 2 ai 1 zd Wdbs : 6e L00Z I0 'urir z91y 0£9 •~ d :~ MITCHELL • ~~ MORGAN City of College Station June 15, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission City Council c/o Development Services 1101 S. Texas Ave. College Station, Texas 77840 Re: Revised Rezoning from C-1 to P-MUD & A-O for the Redmond Terrace First Installment - A Portion of the Community Shopping Center (Reserve Tract) - Vol 188, Page 295, JE Scott League A-50 (Ramada Inn property) Dear Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council: We are currently considering the purchase and redevelopment of the Ramada Inn site on Texas Avenue. This site is located on the west side of Texas Avenue, just south of • the Miliff and Texas Avenue intersection. Statement of Purpose and Intent Our desire is to redevelop the site into an urban mixed use development with the mix of uses consisting of retail, restaurants, office and residential attached housing. In order to accomplish this, we must rezone the property because the current zoning does not allow this concept. Currently, the zoning on this tract is C-1, General Commercial. In order to permit the desired mixed use concept we are requesting a rezoning to P-MUD, Planned Mixed Use Development and A-O, Agricultural-Open. The mixed use as proposed with a developer having a strong track record in the development of student housing is an exciting use which will benefit many of the City of College Stations goals. • It will put student housing close to the TAMU campus. This will further the City's goal to provide student housing close to campus in an effort to alleviate trafFc congestion due to student housing being located far distances from the campus. • It will create a mixed use urban development with a heretofore futuristic design anchoring the redevelopment around TAMU. The A-O request will be placed on the 100-year floodplain area contained on-site. • ~ ~ t3° ~ :~oavr~ 511 UNIVERSITY DRIVE EAST, SUITE 204 • COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 • T 979.260.6963 • F 979.260.3564 /~ _ CNIL ENGINEERING HYDRAULICS HYDROLOCr~1'~• UTILRIES STREETS SITE PLANS SUBDIVISIONS ii•~`ti~.~/_ info~mitchellandmorgan.com www.mitchellandmorgan.com • s Changed or Chang/ng Condit)on With the increased number of new hotels in the area, the existing Ramada Inn is experiencing a significant amount of competfion. It appears that this property, given its' age, its' location near TAMU, the recent adjacent Texas Avenue reconstruction project and the current hotel occupancy levels, make it prime for redevelopment. The City has indicated a desire to encourage development of student housing closer to campus in an effort to reduce vehicle trips per day on the city transportation system. With a TAMU student population of nearly 45,000 and the possibility of that number climbing, it is important to keep these students near campus where alternative modes of transportation are easy to utilize. At the same time, the City has expressed a desire to encourage retail along Texas Avenue and other major transportation corridors in an effort to minimize traffic impacts from retailers on neighborhoods. With this location both near campus and near an older residential neighborhood, it makes sense that a mixed use development which allows both uses is desirable. To accomplish this mix of uses aPlanned-Mixed Use District must be the zoning category placed on the property. In addition, the A-O zoning category is the most appropriate category to be placed on the area contained within the 100-year floodplain on the property. This will assure that this area is reserved for floodplain/drainage uses in the future. Drainage Statement • The site is currently developed with impervious cover. Our intent is to redevelop the site utilizing one of the existing buildings, new parking areas, one new building, and a central amenity area. From a drainage perspective, we will maintain alt existing runoff patterns and we will not increase the runoff from the existing developed conditions. Given these assumptions, detention will not be required. List of Bulk or Dimensional Variances Sought As part of this development we would like to vary from the following specific use standards: NRA pod parking Driveway spacing Detention requirements Buffers Height - SingCe Family Protection It is our intent to meet as many of these requirements as physically possible but due to the site size and the existing conditions on the site, there will be many of these requirements that will be d~cult to achieve, if not impossible. NRA Pod Parking This requires additional space onsite to accommodate this design concept. Because of the size of this property we do not have the room to accommodate these additional . island areas. In order to increase the amount of retail square footage on the site, we must maximize the amount of parking on the site and therefore sacrifice these additional 73 • island areas. By eliminating these island areas we can provide more retail services on the site and increase the tax base along Texas Avenue. Driveway Spacing We understand that the existing drives do not currently meet the driveway spacing requirements. We have attempted to reduce our drives to a single location on Texas Avenue. We have left an area for the adjacent comer lot (Redmond @ Texas) to construct and maintain a driveway to their lot as well. Even with these improvements we will not meet the required driveway spacing. Varying from the driveway spacing along Texas Avenue appears to be the only way to maintain even a single access to this user. Given the request to keep as much retail as possible on the property, a single driveway on Texas Avenue will be extremely important to attract and retain those retailers. Detention Requirements See attached Drainage Statement. Buffers Where adjacent to the single family residences buffering will be provided, however all elements will need to be chosen wisely because of the existing drainage channel and floodplain. A wall would be detrimental in this area because it impedes floodwaters. • We are proposing a 6 foot wooden fence along with a red tip phonia hedge row to buffer against the single family residences. The space available from the existing creek to the existing hotel building will limit some choices on buffering. Our intent is to improve the existing situation. Height- Single Family Protection Any new structure will meet these restrictions. However, the existing hotel structure does not currently meet the single family height protection requirement. Because this building is being renovated and not demolished we would like to assure that we will not be required to meet these restrictions for this structure. We appreciate your consideration of our request and if you have any questions please fq~l, free to call 260-6963. Veronica J.B.~IGIor~ ,~.E. Managing Partner Cc: Paul Thrower, Megaclose, USA Tom Keenan, TCK Realty Corp. • Jeny Tipps, RS~J, Inc. Chuck Ellison, Ellison Law file 74 iY ~~ i 0 ` ~ l ~ __ __ ~ __ g~~ ~.~~, ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ I -- -_ ~ ' ~ 1 1 \ " ` , I I 1~ (~ (~ 0 ,~ I l ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~~~~. t ~ ( ~:~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~tE~ ~ f ~ s ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~# 8 ~ ~ s ~ t ~ ~~~ #~ i ~~ ~~ ~ l~s ~ C ~~ ~~ !~ ~s ~S ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ n ~' rn rn D ° ~ ~ a4rnrz ~ D ~(A a' = N 'v :0 ~~ O Z ' ~~ ~ m f ~ ~.rn~M ~ a r1 ~ ~ ~`c ~~~~°~ ° tOia V)~I < ~"' O° o~o~ a m n ~ ~ N N~m~v O < ~ ` '' m ~~ .1p rn ~ • rn ~ coo ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ J n 2 T Z ~ a rn ~ ~ ~ ~ rn ~ Z rt w N -. o o~ tz~ ~~ Z ~ o ~ o ~ ~ O ~ wo ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ r -~ ~' ~ ° ~ N ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ _~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ • 4 ~A ~~ z ~~~ ~ "Zm ~ z ~nc~~ v $~y:va~ A ~~cQio_ R' ~zo ~ rn ~ ~xN~ ~ ~ ~ v a~ ~ `'~ X~~ rn ~ ~ m ,A v .p ~~~ P' ~ NCR' ~+ x: 6 o Cl ~ f+l v ^'' ~ cn '.. rn OD (A ~_' N ~~z r~~~' czi 0 "~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 8 ~~ ~ ~~~ A ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~g ~~ ~`~ .. ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 3~ ~ ~s ~ gf~ $ O x ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ $~ A~ °~ ~~ #~ ¢~ v~rr~r ,~~~-:~.- ~~ ~y ~: ~: ~~ ~~ ~~~ +~~~W 'b V.. ~~ ~~ VY f f~fl ~~' ~'~~ ~* ~' ,, ~. ., ~~ ~, ~, ~A~ ~~:-~ ,,, } -` ; i; ~~ If ,, ~~; .~ ~I~~ ~.~ ~~. :,. ~,~ ;~,, ~, ~~ ~~ ,~ ~~ ~~ ~~ $' ~~~ ~~5 r ~ ~~ `L ~` ... ~~ ~~~ `~ ~; ~ ~ ~ '~ u ~ ~ A ~ ~~a ~ ~~3~ ~ ~" ~$ ~ s +~w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ W ~~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~'y ~ ~x ~ . N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~, ' ~~~,~~ ~~\ ~. .~',ti ~~ ' ~r~ ~J yiQS~ 1i+ i •,on a ~~_:~ ~~ ~Y I oIIa3Q8PLiQ8~ ~~~~~~i~~i~~~ rrr:ssrrrr~ ~~ ~~~w ~~ _/ '/,.. ~~ ~~~~Ij~~~~i~~~s1~ }.•~~4•}.}•~•~•{• ~~ ~~ -I t: ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~' ' ~~~i i ~ i ~ g \, ~~ ,~ ~~ ~ ~. s . ~~ ,~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ .~ a~ + ~ ~ V •~~ ~~~ ~ u~s ~< ~ ~ ~> ~ ~ ~~ i~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~'~ ,~ ~A ~gp 9~ ~~ ~' ~~ ~~ ' ~ ~'~ ~~~ ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~' ~, ~ `, ~ ', ~~ N ,~~ ~~ `, i , ` \ •! ~ ~~.~ `~ ~~ ~; ~~~~ ~° ~~ ~-r~ _/ ~ ~~8~ ~~3233a.~~aoaaaaaAaas~ ~ ~ A z~~z~e! ~G ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ F•- ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ swap ~rrrrwrtsrssrrr:srrrrr~ O ~ ~~ *~~ ~~~ ff~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ N ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ a ~ ~ a ~~ ~~ ~~ I ~~ ~' L a m .Q ,, r ,,.- . -----r----- ---...._ ~.' ~ i i/ I I r i i i i i / ~ i a ~ i ~~ ; - ~,, ., P i ~ ~. ~ / ~ ,, ., / ~ / ~ ~ . i ~ / ~ / / / 1~ I / 1 ~ t 1 -~ 1 1 1 1` 1 ~ 1 ~S 1 t ~~ 1 I ~~+ ~I^^ r ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 43 C`f ~~ ; i ~~ ~ r 1 1 1 ~~ 1 1 1 , 1 1 t 1 1 1 l i l i ;,; ; ; 1 f - '~ '- 1 1 ~ 1~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ _ i ~ 1 i ~ _ '~ 11 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ b ~ ~ N , ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ 1 1 t 1 ~ ~ t 1 ~` ~ ~g ~ f `` -.`. 3 ; ~`i ~;~ ~~ 1 ~~ I: 1 ~ 'i ~ ~ !~ `. ~~ ~ 1 1 F ~ i 1 , i ,~~\ ` ~~~~ ~ Ll31C~Y3 auun ~ , / i ~ ~ 1 ` ~~~ ~M ~ / 1 r ~~ ~~. .~ .~ .~ /, 3 ~ g~~ c. -1 ~ p ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~_~ ~ ~{ ~~ ~ ~ N m~-~~ ~~ N A a m ~ ,..,, ~ m m ~,~ ~z m ~~~ mv~o~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ z N m ~ ~~ ©~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ C ~~ ~ .. - ~. ." _ i .' ~'. ,.~ ~ .' ~ ~ C~ ~~ .'mow 04 ~' / O ~,,: see ~/~ ' t ~.~ ,~ ~o ,.'r - ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1~ FQl '&1 7818 '7~1 1DYdtL ~7Y jYBY' ^~ iN7D~l ,QC~ ..~ +^ .~. .tYJ11JYi8~Yd 31NADb lA ~' / /~ 1 1 1 i 1 I •! ~ I 1 .~ /~ . 1 r / ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ / ~ / ~ ., /~ /~ ~ f / I ~ i 1 ~ 1 / 1 I / 1 / 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 / ~ 1 ~ 1 I t 1 1 ,- 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 i ~ i 1 1 ~, i 1 1, ,, 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ ,~ ,/ ,1 i; ~ 1 ; s I ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ s ~ 1 1 1 11 1 11 i ~• r s~ ~: -o 0 ro n a 70 i -I x z 0 1'" r~ i i m C7 ro a ro 3 t+' O 7 e+ N P N N I~ ~~ a b m x m -i Q m rn 0 °v v 0 0 .p D n t~ 6y ~' t ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~` ~` ~ ~ ` r A ~ ~ ~ ~ Q. \ ~ ~ \ \ \ \ ,~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / \' ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ \ N ~ ~ ` ~ \ \ • ,. yt ~ ~ ~P ~ ~ -, ~~'"' x fir ~~ `~ , ~ ~ `~ `~ n .~ ?~ ~ n - ~ ~ ~ `~ // ~ ~ \ `\ ` ~ - ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~~ ~ `` , ` ~ ~ ", ~ ~. \ _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~- ,,. ., !~` ~ Y ~ ° i ~. ad ~, i ~ ~~ ~ ~ m ..~ w~ ,~.~+ ~ ~Y"'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ ,~ 1 1 ~ ~o •i 1 ~ ~ 1 ` ~ 1 1 a 1 ... 1 ~ , 3 -- ~ 1 .". 1 1 ~ 1 11 b 1 '~ 1 I f i O~~~ t 1 1 ~ 1 ~0~0 ~ , 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ~~~~ 'Ci' 1 1 1 t 1 , 1 1 j~ 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 ~ -1 t 1 t A~ ~~ ~~ N '' p N r~~ r # ~~ s ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r" ~ sg r .p ~ f 1~~- f~ .~ ~ ~w ~ m ~ ~~ ~ N o ~ o ~ r ~ --~ N ~ w ~~~~ ~' ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ w i • ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~, ~ ~~ N ~\~ -IS1e3G R!\IM~ereNr oNr.-u~eein-spnno ~r\ew\~-~ nee. ~eayrien\rurnNO\xoo~ rt.pw~\R.o~ iao~.e+a a/u/xo~ ros:x w cot m "' 'A n n s' g E S `9 ~~> ~ 'a TTl' O ~ C~ °g~ p~ ~ r ~~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~~ X~~RPY N~ ~~ ilk y i rZVC ii F.9 u "3` ~ N~ ~ °°^~A ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ o~C m~ ~~4~4~° a ~~ 82~ Si n 's ~~' ~ ~ ~ '~ iM ~ ~e~ Si °ao3CN°~~ 9i o ~ n ~ c E ~ o u ~ ° ~c ~ c ~~~ ~~ c~ °~ i 9 3 ~ ~ d 9 ~ ~ O o ~° ~$+~'SE r~ 3 ii~F ~ 'Z' o ~ S S ~ ~..= o° u gE a Q' a'~ 4~ N a k~qo ~~~Q~ Z ~y (n ~ Z."tl ~Z ~ ~ ° g x s~~~ 'o ~~ 9'~ ~ 3~ 3, ~Y ~ q&~~q~ n r ~ ACT ''0 r ~ NSDRe F `~ ~ g~O».' ~~ ~R ~ p8 0 ~&~~~' m ~ Q~~ ~ ~ V~l11'I ~ 'moo m N C ES Noy' yr ~ Nc~n rcn~ $ 8~ °~~4p;p ~ °~ s - a]y° a~g ~~cJ4 .J.{ /~ p~ M ~ w" p O ~O ~ "'~ N p ~ ~ ~Q s C `O Z V W n' ~ C ° '1' OQQ.N ° O 3 $ ~` p= ~~ Y A K O K O J O 3 ~• '{ ~ ~~ ~~~~ a ~~ ~~ ~~ ° ~~ ~~~ a~~ v S ° ~° zo ~ ~ .i '.Sr ~ , 3 ~' ~ $ t FF~iii e m m a y ~ :C 030 p ~ ~ ti ~ ~ $ ~ s ~~j ~i F~ °.e pL:r ~~CgcE~~'.iQj ~cEw :~ 3~ ;g ~ ~gG }O ..i o" m R: ror ro arat ~~' ~~ C r C N ? oo ~ N z c rn ~c- ~~ ~ orn z ~ orn mD r_ao p ~ _ao ~ ~ ~ C r~ ~ ~-] N .~~ z~ o~ ~--1 ~, C1~--I z ., .. .~ 0 o D~ p~ ., p ,. ., o~ N~ Z '-~ N~ z ~,~~ ~~~cl~n.O ~v~ ~ _DWm ~~ rnc~ ~~ -~ , rn W m ~~ '~ O z --i ~ p z --~ _ -~ z ~z rnmrn Wmrn ao ~ ao ~~~~ ____~ m m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ w N -~ m O m ~ ~ O n ~mD ~ O ~ , r rr ~ D D z ~ ~ ~ ~ D m I r N ~ m N r z m D d W m ~ ~ ~/!v z O~ ~\ ~~ o /~ ~ ~h Plan aesr.w~\PUtnw\zoo~ R.Piac\ aam.u.a s/~2/~om ros:so Pw cor • "'""""""" ""' "'0"~~5€&€€~s~~6~~&~~~s6~~5&5:55.~~~~~~Peaaa~&~&~~~fG~"s"s£"s~i£"a."sGGS~~~fi&55~&5~555~E&~~:,a;c:~c=;ssoss:c~_ g ~ir~Ma4M~0Y~~5i 8iYP.Q`8 2 N 2 N 2 N 2 N N N N N N;;2 2 2 2 2N2 2N2 N 2 N22 N NNN~~QQN 2 267 2 Ny 227 2 Z7N22 N2N ~Q N 2 ~~~~Y~~~~'~Y Y'~Y'~Y'~Y~Y'~Y"~~ Y"~Y'~' V~Y'~Y4 Y"~Y'~Y"~Y"~Y'~Y'~' Y"~y~Y^~Y'~Y'~Y'~Y'~Y~~Y~Yr'{V'~Y^~Y'N Y'~Y'KY ~'VI`Y~'~~'Y~~YHY"~~~~~~Y1y~~~~~q ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'~ ~~ 66b66b ~5~~~~~Z~~~!!S!!S ~y~'' F. y ~ Y ~.Y~. ~y~y$y Y~y $Y~ y Y~Y~Y y~ $ Y Y~jy~ ~yh YY`"'llL``~SY Y y222ii1 GG~! YS~' 821 2! Z $eXXX~" ~a,YYY,~y 999 M1* ~!t MM~~~M~~M~~L ~+E~aFYrt~M~~EMMM~fMM~MI~'M~~~M~M~~EYM~F ~f~M~M~MMM~M~~~~~M~~M~M~f M~F aEYMM~MMM~i~M~M~MMYMNM~Mai M+t ~FMMMMMH~f +~MMM~~M~aF+fM~ ~j~$7 44 ~ A~y,yrIR ESPRg`PH `P l+ar t+P `PPrPR`P M H~q S+ ~Ary•`•!•`A`P`f~A~. vf`e vS4. r°H~`P ~H~~ f~~~~r HP N~`P~~~`~yly PAPA A.~iP~ ~SP~SRR~$#t ~Y PFP~P~"A `~ehP~~b~P 6` ~~Y,~~~~Zwffi~1YF8@1c5488,`~8F~888~t`~$8~8~8"d~2~."14SY"&~$rd,8~&8:~II808~8888~88',~~o,'o,~,",33°S~BL"_~~CEH~Y:,~8o`y.°BSIt$d',8$i64",8~E~88~afik8$?4~8~4~d,~8k8$8a~~ sE7 ;aa~5a5a~ NYS: ~s~~ saaszca3a~ ~ ~~~s~~5r~r~~~~~g~a~ar~a~$ `;~eO ~t aS~R~BA~ wp'8's° k5~5i~ ~ " k~~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~~t t~ u ~L~S~~~~~57~~~8~8~~~~~~~ ~ ~ v, 8~ s K MYM~~ MGM MM ~ ~ So~o~~'YY'~~g~B~S°~ff~~L';~8'` ~[MM~ atM~fM~M~fMMM~~~aEMMM~ ~~p~~p~~~ (1rp~ 8505;6 y1 o~O~~]n~~ ~ OOSIO C88p~~ 6`~O R ~hNt+i~v~~Pg ~j~ $ PGNV,~ b~ ~~py`A1¢'~~~Br~QYVy~Cky"~]~ Ok f~H ~~ ~~O~GYGY~I4HN0005]S~tl~NN~ i ~ p 23 . Ff ~~ i~ i^Sf ~ y y p ~~ 55 ~i ~~}~S~ i ~ p ~Sf~~~F7 ~ I 4 N p n ~Sg~i e~Ci7 ~ ~~~lAZ Ybw~ •44 ~ ~ 2NNNNN ~ gggg CCCIII S~i4$~S~ NNN2 ~k~~~ ~ NNN ~~y~ N~ ~ 1 Ap ~ k4 P i . 3 c, }}}}~~~~ to S3~S .YN •Ab Y' q •$~ ?6 Gb4 ••~ i ,~ •• ' I i `•••• I ~ ` •• • • • • ~ • • •• • I • , •,• ~•~ ~ I ' z~m • `. . t~ --- -------------------- -------------~-- ------ ------------------ - _ "", _l j_ •• ~ ••` 1 ~+ /1'~~~a-- - - -u•-iwc~- - -- -_--s ~r.:rtcr.~sax• ~~ ., . ''1 ',~ • ,., - - -- ----- -~- --- ---------z----- .. _ • .'•~ %' ~~ns .ar ~s ' -;-- -~- -------~--------- _ -------- ---- - - ---------------------- - ~ M -- (/'/f ~~ca ~ I ~ ~ P I I • $ I ~ 1 ______________ _ 1 I I • ' ~ I i S~ N- N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~8 ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~' ~~~ ~~ e ~z m S~z m ~~~ yon ~ J ~~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~'` ~~~°~~m~ y z ~ m ~ z ~ °~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~P~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ O ~ a ~ O ~r ~ +~ ~~g Naz-~ Naz a D mm's Wmm ~°o OZ -1 apZ mom ~m~ ~~ ~~`• $ ~ •~ ~ ~ " ~. ~~t ~ ~ 77. \1~. /~/ '. ~ ..~:. ~ J ~ ~~ OD OVl Off) DOr mZ OC ADp~Z ~O N~ Cm V) CD ~5 m~AmC.r{D piN ~g Ng~;o ~m VIO D OA1~-I Z1~~0 _~ ~ O O O D Z D D m 0o mm o~zN~oFm DA° ~m Z~oN~Cm Zm A coOZA m~ v~ ~~~~o~o D D jD- ~Z Dm OCRC S{ Np~Cjy ~< mm -IZ r'rDNf0+l0 ~v Af 2v C :DS x~ vs ~C~~~~~ fN ~D pN.y~~N~ ~~ ~o `D°p~;Tg ~~ m O y A l V)~ v~ AD AZm C~ r m ~ ° D ~~ O(~'1 CDS jm ~m m mANoO<Of ~m m~ nNZm~Nm v r O ~S' m ~ ~ D N ~~~ Q A r n vln zD $DOP mD vv AF~ ov,~ Nm ~A NO~pI'~N mN OO m~2°00.-. m VI< mC Op T p ~ZN<Z NyyN A ~^'m2-(AN D o <jym2 ~... m m =~o-D-II~~ D r ~ N S Z 2 N -i 2 m mmpocs r m OX~D~~ Z A pDVI~<D< O D ON m '~ p m y ~ Z H A m D N J N 2 O O D p OF D F n 00 O ~ '~ `< `z D C) ~ D Z n p m J ~ z o •• °~ o m~ o ~Z I Z1 N O Z 1 z'I I OA r C~ c "' ~~ o~ r DZ mm m v~ m A~ ~ ~~ _ ~ m ~ A ° N C O A O O v z c~ -I ~ o _ 0 A DN.~~1~ C O N o A m ~ c.ZAA 0 ~m m N j O A J ~ N K ~sz`" or ND~_{O Z m D C m ~ 0 ~~20 NZ~ ~Do pm ? ° Nln N~.~( nAC DON ~O-{ NNfA'1 nOm N om0 D ? 00 N O N !n N ° m nn0 ~~ WmD v -p ~ m C ~A~ O ~ D N m Nmr orm n O ti DvN r N ~ Ip -I vm mD 2~Ir-I Dm0= N n < ~ O m 0 2 Z D D~ zr p0 O?7 f~* C AOm ~ D Z ~ f'1 O= I'+1 D2~ r r1 ~1~Z~ ~x m ~ ~>~i° ~ ~mmA ~ I O D D ~ ~ ~ my -iADv mm o ~~ O< OP 01mi1 ~1 -`O ~ D ~ n I Z m InZ ~ N m ~ {n~D ~ I n N arm I °O~ ~ 0 N v p D O _' ~Zm n ~ m n°~ m N A ~ m ~ ° ~ C H a~ ~z r --~ II O 1~+ O Lam. la I I' i ~~ I t~~~\~~ I!1i iii ii: ~ sl ~ I i i __--'.~ ~ x i ! I I I :n - ~ ~ ~ III I I ; ~ .I I I OIN~1 I ~ m'~ \\` .: I rX. 16' U?:JTY ESMT. ________-i Om ---- Z I ; i I ! _a3ewv ~.~av3 . , ~-- m `.\~ . -' ~ I ~ •. •~'~--~ l; I ~ i ':III ~~ !ml I i~~ ~~~ j ' nA :~rK, iii 'I ';~! iii ~ ~cZi `` \\: ~ A~ I; r r I Y I ~... :~,e ~; : O I r .. n ~ I ~/// i%o iii o c1li `-~,~ xill m I' ~--~. °W~~g[~iJ Oi I c~, ~ i~c :._ I ~ 4~xi I ;~ /' z y lily N~ 1 : ;' u: : ~ ! I A' I v ~ ~ iZ• I y m ~,- C. : ,,''r,~ ,, ; '~ ~; ; : '~.1, ~ I ; A z of ~ ;N ji i ~; rr!i ~I ., ~\l~ :si I I ~o "r. ':7i 1 rO1.Ii ' I r . i' ` i ~ i~ i ( L-.I I +~ vl 'C] I LO N l i i i r I I i! l'I ~ i' ~'OLi I ~' ~o . ________ py015 M 8£.65. I i~% li III _ ~/~ i r I 1 I i I-________ ~~:: ~ ~.~Vr,~.l ~~rl '1189 3'.O~,~L00 N I ; ;; .1~, ,.~r_rn .oa_x~~ I N 04'21 48~,~H-,~9 2.32 _~ ... __~278~3~ ahr~l' v o I ~----------'jai `-~_T~ ~~.s_IVr."~,1.~ ` ~=.~ti=o-,r ~ ~ % i '",~:llit~i/ i c~ 1.~ n i ) i 1 •}. I I I t, ~ v `~ x0 u ~ , ~' 1i'/ ~\YJ`I ~ o I ,~~~-~ Y ~i / / / I I I t \~. ---"+r-.m ~~`~ '~ \L, /A_.%~G J/vy'_~~~1g{ NZ I'J^I ~' 11. rr~/~/.~'/ I I _ Gl \\: ~~~..L I/~` li%n\~u 150/I.lO:%/f'!" 'Yid.=:'L~ N 1_ I~ 1 1 rrR VII n 3 • pmp 1~~c, N.~ = EI 1 '' ~ ~ i o o / .-_____ _ 182.95 ~ I 1 ~ I' i - _ c / X ~~i o ^ of u ~ I i-'- ~~ Ao ~' ~rlri1'~ I'ijh~~iil! I I U ~ I I/ %' / I D rlli l'~I IdFI"ill I ~ 1 i i ; s` _ _ i `~ ~`° ~~Idlit~j ~ i I I .~ ii N ~ i__- ~ ~~~~ -. Knit l.• ~ jPldd:~~gt I ~ ~~ c / ^~ i / ~ ~ I~l I' li l'III! ~ ~ bl O I ~ ' ~ `) \) ;~~; ;1111 II/ [ `• rl f m N I;il h '" M tn: I r i "III'jl I( ~' IN L J ++i I F' r rn o ~"- ~ j i II'i;~l:il ~ i~11.1'~ I I to I !. .~ -i Illllallj'I ~ la~~I II I ~~JJ ~ Itc,. ~' i c>i ~ i ~ !_ I,t'Ippl~ • ~i I111i1 l~ I pi "O'I' a F+ ~ I-e1 (/~ ~ W ~ ~. ~ I ~ ~ it ~ is y ~ /' ~1~/ ~_ m.'h'1 lV O ' r ` 'y O A f~A ~ d ~ N ~ ~~ I~ (~ C-' !0!~~ ~y Ip O I i i ~ j ~ ~ L r~~ ' I ~. ~ m ~ "! V1 t~A ~ t,,, I1F".~~-' ~ ~' ~ ~ 17 '.7RC O I i i ~ ' ' m ~. v . ~ 1` ~ J i ~-~l ~ ~ O 07 O d y N N 1--' ~ ~ ~ U] y~ R'1tC ~ (D 't7 ~ O 1 it I ~'i _~~ ------------°------- ----- = rl --~'- ---- - ----- ,~:.~------_J~~-~~...~ - e~ d z y Ip ~ rr ~ ~ ~. "7 '''' N I.1 t[7 ~i S 01'f6~48" E 674.40 i ~ ~ ~ ~ O q p, ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ Z O ~ ~ ~, '~ S 01'35'17 E 277.5 .~ ~. rv Kr ~ ~ ~ _ ~a mo ~,,~ y r., ~ N yk~~ ~bnxb ', I ~ m~ o~CCn m o ~ co~~t~rn~ ~ ~~t~ rn H ~ ~ ~~-~+ ~ ~ pOj O Oi ~ M rTl ~ k .~.. ~ r0 I m I Q~ ` 1 coy ~~w rnv,oe"~j f ~F O co o Iv ~ `Y ~ QJ C i } _ _ ~P (D ; S > ~~ ~ ~ /) o d ~ g i d~ Q~ ~ 4~ p~ac~a c~po~oa®~ paa~~ Imo H ~ M E Y E R ~ " ~. ~ pG~6~~~G~ p[~L!14 ~°~ L~1C~L°3C~ ENGINEERING , I N C . o ° $, C' ~, (5'~ ~~ C~OQd6f~(~[~ ~Qp4ppp(~ Q~jj'~D CIVIL ENLiINEERINO • PLATrINC3 d ~ f5 ° ~ II-'"")) /~\1n~1n~~V/ ~/~[l SITE & LAND PLANNING O V O u~O~ ~V W V I/ 9 V ~~(~(.°.IttJ P.O. SOX 9~46f7 ~L[WI~VILL[ ~7OU!• 17607 O V 079-O f1b-9~~0 PMON[ ~ ~7f-YOMVN fAX OO <O<OD~ ~ ~ D D ~ ~ O~ - CZ O I~IDOm r N r r m r rm N m r A Z omm A~ a A ~~N~m ~ oA m ^-1= A p W OD X Z O Irm1 ~ N 6 ~ A O A r -i' N D -I O C D D D D 2 Z O O O O m Z f N~ D ~ p O v r N 0 0 O? mm m ~° AO 3 y N RR11 N Z 'p ~ _ ~ < ~ ~ v m- CODD ° p m ~ Df0*10000 D NO ~ ~Z yO~A A fm*I C C ~~CCC~ x QA D yN m ~ O m r r D C w< 'O nm~z vNi m ~ ~ -zi<<jCm vZmi m O cDir m m CAC o ~ v mo mOpm D m { tDllDmmmti 1;T1ZNN m °~ Z Zm VIN VIO 2 n m Z m ~ S~ m 2 ~ o u) m z m m m m r N -ml O O m~~ N ~ VI ~ N~~~~ C m D 1 D ZOC7 O r Dm ~ .'0 0 ti 0 S m C m A TI prp m r rW N m D ~ OC~F D A ? ^' tiDZZ~O m r y f~~IO VIr r 2 < r OZO~O~ Z r S ~ ~ m m D C (7 2 2 'i m~ m N O m D mO2 pO ~ ~ D~-OiZ A A- p ~NmZ'9~ r A O mm < V1D2 AO Z 1° r D ~ C -N-I C C Z~ r~~ m m ~m0~ m~ D p v°mrOZ m VAI < Z :fl ~ Z O (~ N O~OVI < D O ~<m ~ ° ~ ~ 2 ;il ~m~~ O N~ r5+amz~m r N w min r v z Amy mf'I < O vrin~< v m~'AO~c ~ ° ~_ Dnr3 ~y 00~~ ~ r Z r~n S ti ~ A C fA'I=Z'O Z CX yZ m-C D ~ Z m D 1 S m Z Vl m Z~ Z 'f ~ y Z N~ O D ° m ~ ADZ m <oln Dm z o mA n c r~ m O ~ m~< m Z O p r Z { ~ C ovla~ ° mms oN ~ ~ m ~pc m NmN N.. m Z N2m V) OZ O A OAS ~ v ~ 2 m ~" Z D VAj m JC y Z -( V) ~~ Rs~ ~ ~ ~~ 8. 3nY ~ $ g~ ~ ~~I~~~ ~~~~ ~ <-~, ~ ~~ ~` gR' ~ ~~ ~ ~g~~ 9 ~.~ 8 $ 3~s33 ~~3 ~~ ~~ €8P~'~ ~~~~~ ?< ~ 3c c g S R 'a g$# R d8S ~3 `' ~A' ~. ~~~~ ~~ ~a$js. ~~ RgiF ~~$$~~ ~~~~~. ~ es c ~~~,~# B~ ~ 33 gga ~ ~q&~ ~7§I~~ 8~ ~ i c~+~~3' ~~ ~3~ 0 I ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ A °~° °~ ~ O ~ ~ aR ~m as ~ xg~ ~ ss.~ $~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ $ ~~ J~s ~ R ~~ ~~ ~$e ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 3n3n ; o ~ 3 ~ (3tt yyyy,,(3 sa ~ ~~ 5~ ~ ~ ~_~3. ~ ~g ~ ~ N 5~~~ ~ ~' ~' e ~ ~ 4a'~ ~ ~ n ~~~~ ~~~ g ~ ~ . ~~~ ~ ~&:~ ga ~ ~$ ~ ~ i ~S +'~ ~ R~ ~ ~~~ ~a ~~ s~ J s~ ~ . e ~g~ a ~"a_ y s 3~t~~ 3 S g o m ae ~a N. w N L x ,~veCxxxxma~~+ tzd~ oo ~ P t -~_, o~obin ~R' ~~ ~ ., c ~ iriR ~~~ i^mm ~>~ 3 NN ~°; ?°~ ~f fan r ` ~ ~~~~a~~~s~~~~~R~a~~~~~ ~ ' ~ YY ~ ~iaps _a 8~ ~~ o ~ ~ o~gi8~3 gg g ~~~ -~~x~ $ ~~ s ~u g ~~~$}~ ~ R~~~ ~~g ~~ ~ ~ 3' $ 3 i~ ¢ }1 ~~ ~ @~ 8g ~g'~t g ~ ac !~ ~~ g ~ ~5 ~"s~ $ _ ~ $ sons +R~S 3 ~ ~ ~/ I I I~ 0 ~~ .; ~ _~ a ~3 np I ~ ~\ O~ 2~ [~~ O~~ ~~O ~?~ tp ~ !D ~~~ ti~ ~y0 C 00~ ~2 O~ Z /1T~~ I I I I \ I I i \ I i .°r. I I I e I I ! m I x, I I I I I j ,~' -,- a ~~ I k/,f~,' /,,~,' '~-~ - ;, I~ y~~- ~ I. -- ~ ~ I~ ~ s ~. I I i\ d mli ?% -s ly` el NIA ~ I I ~ SI I; E A I 6I ~ 1 ~ j I' J 1 r li / ~'-'- i--5 ~ --~- .rJ I j j /~ I I I I I I ~ I I i f b ,, ~ 1 , \ ~~ ,~ ,, ~~, 1 1 11 1 \ ` ~ \ 1 ` ,\ 11 \ 1 \ 1~ ,. ~~ 1 a A a to ~a ~\ ~~ i / / /~ / ~~ ' ,, ~ 73. ~onpk ~ ~ ,~? ~e ~' $ `3' $ / ~ /,, / ' ~ ~, o er ~ / ~,I x 1 ~; ~ / ~"~ ; I / ~~ ' ~,,~~~ ,, I T/ ` 1 1 1 / `1 1 I 1-~~ 1 ~ I I IYz I ~ I 1 jts}~ ~ ~` I ' pl I s~ mI ~ I-r I xl I ~ I I I xl I i II I I _. O I Y 2 l g l I'• ~1p ~ ~ u u ICI I I\ I ^1 IYI I ~; • I I ICI ~ j:~ I S ~ w I ~ I 'F I I ° "t y ~ I I I: m I -f `~-- -- ~; ~ 1 Ij I ~ i I i tai I j s= I I j ~i ~ II j I I (` Cif `~}. _ _ if(enene°~ - _ _ J. I ~ _ ~ s sr~rse• w - f6aon• cf - - - ~ ~ ~ , -_~ I I Chow Con}ron Orive m' ao.w ~ Ha! 3974 fq. J30 CN^ ~'y$w gb~i ~8 :' G~~ ~~ ~~ °~~ 1\ `~ ` s \\ 1\ \ ` `o ` ~ ~ ~~~. 11 I ~\1~ \ ~,~ 1 $~ 1 ` 1 1 ~~ \ ` ` ~ '~ ,, 11 ~ `. ~ ~~ ~ -1 1 ~. ^11 lez I ti e 1 j~°r 1~ ~~o sl I t^ IY~ ~~ I I i ~~ II r I , Ij Q I I I .ft / / // i ~ / /~ 73• / D ~~ i / Yo , i ~e I/ / / 8c ~ ~ l mi ~ / '~~ r.--- _ ~T- ;------~-_~.;~~; A ~ ` 1 ~ ~ ~o 0 s 2 ~a ~ ~~ ~~ ~' ~ ~ I ~WU~ 8$8 ~~u~ a~s gay $ ~8. ~~~ aN~~ aY~? a~~ ~ ~"~u~ $k7n s~ o ~ ~~ ~$~ / ~~ ~ ~~~ ~a x~s~ °~o ~~ U~8 o~ / 70• P (>ea/A E. I m 8 ~'~~. I I I f ~ R ~~ ~~ ~% / ~g~ / ~~~ / ~~ $R ~ Y~~ ~A ~;~ 8 ~~ ~ / 10~ P r~; ,; ~~, I ~~, _ '~~ 1 ~~-- I m 8` -~. I I I q. I I ~ ~ __ ~ ` ` ~~ cO"p•yaf~mt.\ I ~ I ~~ I - JI i i ~- ~ b~ =x ~~ I } ~ Ley ' _ a ~.- ~ 1 /r ~ I ~~~~ j ~~ I I W:I I y: i=I j ~!gS ~ I I `I j a ^ ^ ~I I I! e~, I I I ~ Yo I I I E° I II I xnl I ~I\II j ` ~ ' I I ~ ~y i L 50 B.S.L ~c>9.enem I V t ~(an_/awl ~, ~~._ ~ _ X11- - ---J _ j, I s ar2rse' w - fBaon' cr Choco Conyron Drive )0' R.O.W. ~ Na! 3974 Pq. 130 II I ~; a a Iu I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I_ I - L~ - _ \ '- ~__ ~~\ -_ \ ..~^ ~- ~+ ~ ~ p ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~8~~ z ~ ~ ~ ~~a ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ©~ i~ a y \\ ~ ~r 1~ (~ r .C~ `~"a. ~ 1' ~ ~ N A gs~~ m ~ mm;° ~a~8 ~ .zoS 8aa 8 ~gvm c~$ ~ ''° ` z a m o(oa m uF m s~g~'~.0'3 i+8~ mS ~ w u~ a o n m m~g4 ~a~ a ~°. m W '~ 3 0 8~~~ ~~ ~ ~5~. ms 0 8~am oa $s Sd o m' ; g `° 's m ~ ~~is° $8 °, ~a;a a~ A „3+$ ~» a as mz 3 ~~ ~~ » ~~ o G~ 03 _ ~ m n ~~~ vn8 mgy ~ W N + 0 = _ .. J oo_SAy~7 _ gg. 1p a7 n~~=++C~ aoT~§a'g~'~' `duo $« a~p~a S~85gii '~ m~3~S$ °}~mg cS4mxg :~~_°vrr 0 4~ ~~~~ g ~~ w ~ t w~ o x N g m$ mps ~"s8 w a~ W 3 a ~w ~ maa7i566~W ~~aa~ a~.o=. m~W~~ O 9=__.m Ec3w o 3 am y mo nab W ~_ ~-0.3 ~~~"~a S=~'3n o~mW ~'°" ' m = W ' ~ ~ O 6 V ~ O 01 = O ~ an as ~ m_,.3 ~-~,~s _''QQ~ m maom3 $~'n~'o° =.~o. o~ o?c goers 7 au8=g cf=g~ W oar =.ac ~~d~ r+ _~ma~o r''~ocT~o c=ya wa,Z ~m~ a °a s8 °daa "m'aa~ c=Ac ~' ao°3 A~'2~ mnov ~"~z ~~;~ sa~~ ams~~ ~.;H.z~ ~ffis~ s.W~a m,z4~m 5' _ aam W a~ m,t~' ~ffi a~ ~.n~ ~~ >•n m W yu =TW tae ~=.am~ ~Mm~N. 8~xm ~m » ~mom~ ~$~.a~' aun m~nQ nn av ~ p me a$ c ~ a ~4~ m= n Z a y g ~~~~~~ "s ~.arrt ' ~~~~~~ ~ i tt~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~y~~~~~ ~ m ~~ ~i~t~~ ~ ~ ~ D a ~~ ~ lgPJa?tSY~ y y' ~~ f~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~_ Yam R~eb w ~~ m ~ 9, ass es~s ~ ~;~ c ~ V i- ~~~ Atlm iSYA~ ~ ~ ~ Q, a~a>,dw 3 8~ a o o e t "°°°` """~ c3i °° o~o~o..ba ~ QA .iw Dxoe w~_w.a~r In Nwv qg~y^ ~ 8tnchnd 3i ~ ~ o ~ ~ ui o P~Idnp T O N `a ~ ~ ~~a ~ ^~' ~ W ~_ ~ 0 ~ (D Q ~_ \ ~ ~ ~~ ~. • • ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~_~ ~~~~~ ~~ N ~ ~a / $ i .: ~~ o: ~ ~~s ~ ~ ~: x_ _ ;~ u ` u ~o, ~~ /~.,~~, ~"r imp w ~ ~S ~~QFF / _ _ ~ +R ~ ~ tip' ~~ z ~. \ %/ ~~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ j m i ~ w ~ ~~~ tl ~ ~~ . ~ N u / \~$ ~5 ~~ ~- ~~~ R, ~~ o?~ ~ ~ ~'o. ~'~m 4 Wd~+ 0 • o~ D r rn S ~ u8 I v N (~ m ~ m ~~~ m vi D m W 9~~m [fO z ~C =1 ~~ic~ ~bm ~sr~ j O n ~ N m~~ p z ~n c ? O ~l O io~~x ~~m r~' m~i W ~ D O Z n~ ~ •_"... ~ o ~ ~I N N N D I'T1 D ~ ~~pC 0~1~ I~w+1~1~ ~ C ~ fDV ~ pJV OOVp~ n+ m D ~ ~W c z ~ ~~ ~ ~ o A `-' .S~ ~-- ~ ~ . • ~ ,~ .. ,.~., ~ ~ cry N d ~ - I ~ • ~, ~~~ / i ~ ~i / ~ ~' r~~ ~~,~~ 11111111I~a~ ~" '^ v x ''A 'a g ~ ~ G o _ v ~ n ~ 3 ~ ~ A ~ \ m N O N 3 ~ ~ ?I T ?I ~ » ~ / '~' ((~~ x p~ p d d W d °° ii a c - ~ 3 3 3 S' e ~ ~ ~ a X ~~~~ ~ ~ : ~. ,~ ~~~~~ C ~` >~ `~~~\ ~~ ~ ~ x m® ~ ~' r ~ / / (C T S~~ ~(n 7 ~ °. ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ D d a ~ ~ o ~ a N N T d, m ~ =~ a o \~. ~ \ v_ ~ d i ~i ~a m , ~ oo ~~ z 0 / ~i ~ ~ O Ln ~ -tom j ~ ~ / ,% ~~ ,. c~ j ,` ~° ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ \ d '~ ~ 111111111'° a o ~ m ~ - ~ w ~ _ ~ °° m ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ 3 i,~ _® 1 ,, n ~ T T T \/ _ W I ~ y N m m 71 Z "(- ~~~~,~ ~~ I a a ~ „ ~`~ ~ ~ ' ~ j ~~ ~ $ ~ 8 "Y ~, ~ 3 ~ ~ ~\~ g z _ ~ ~ ~~ _ ~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Mitchell & Mor an L.L.P. 9 ~ Consulting Engineers and Constructors g ~ ~ _ a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ o ~ o N ~ a ; a c ~ o ~.~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ _~ W ~ Texas Ave Mixed Use Develo ment 511 University Drive East, Suite 204 College Station, Texas 77840 ~. ° ;, ~ a ~ ~ ~ ,~' = a=~ R$„ D ~ ~ W W ~, ~ m ~ ~ g ~ ~ 3 ,~ ~ o a ~ a o, ~ ~ y o Z . P (979) 260-6963 Fax: (979) 260-3564 ~ _ ~ =~ Z r a" 3 A ~ ~; ~ -~ '~ m s ~+~ ~j y - ~'~ ~~\ <<, . ~~~~ /; ~ /~~ / / / ~ /~