Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/03/2007 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission~~ C.11'Y OF COLLtiCiE S~I't1~!'ION Planning c4• D~aKGtpnurn 5~rnica AGENDA Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, May 03, 2007, at 5:30 P.M. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Call the meeting to order. FILE COPY 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff. • Indian Lakes ~ Phase 1 • Castlegate Section 5 ~ Phase 2 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the vision for Wolf Pen Creek. (LS) • 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on the Management Planning System. (TC) 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update to the Commission on the status of items within the P&Z Plan of Work (see attached). (JS) 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. • May 8, 2007 ~ 6:00 P.M. ~ CPAC • May 29, 2007 ~ 11:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. ~ Council Chambers ~ Joint Meeting with Planning and Zoning and City Council 8. Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding the Comprehensive Planning process. 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of • existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 10. Adjourn. • Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Gode Section 5S1 07~ } • nossible action The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. • Notice is hereby given that a Workshop Meeting of the College Station Planning and Zoning Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on the Thursday, May 03, 2007, at 5:30 P.M. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the day of April, 2007, at CI'Tl' OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By Connie Hooks, City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of the Workshop Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website, www.cstx.~ov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on April _, 2007, at anti remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: by , Dated this day of , 2007. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of , 2007. Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.eov. Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. • AGENDA Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission ~I'Tlt OF COLLEGE STATION Thursday, May 03, 2007, at 7:00 P.M. Planning d Devclopmenr Services Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 3, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not • be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 3. Consent Agenda. 3.1 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Phase 1 of the Sonoma Subdivision consisting of 29 lots on 8.533 acres, located at 2755 Barron Road. Case #07-500047 (LB) 3.2 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plat for Edelweiss Gartens Phases 10 & 11 consisting of 114 residential lots on 24.864 acres located just east of William D. Fitch Parkway and south of Eagle Avenue. Case #07-00500069 (~) 3.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Sweetland Subdivision consisting of 1 lot on 1.996 acres located at 3105 Freneau Drive. Case #07-00500077 (JR) 3.4 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. •S April 19, 2007 ~ Workshop Meeting • April 19, 2007 ~ Regular Meeting • 3.5 Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. • Bill Davis ~ April 19, 2007, Workshop & Regular Meeting Regular Agenda • 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on an ordinance amending Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Article 2 Development Review Bodies, Article 3 Development Review Procedures, and Article 5 District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards of the Unified Development Ordinance, regarding Concept Plans. Case #07-00500004 (CH) 6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on an ordinance amending Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Section 7.6 of the Unified Development Ordinance, regarding Buffers. Case #07-00500004 (LB) 7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on an ordinance amending Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Section 5.2 of the Unified Development Ordinance, regarding Residential Dimensional Standards. Case #07- 00.500004 (LB) 8. Discussion and possible action on fithire agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual infol7natiou or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent Ineeting. 9. Adjourn. • Consultation with Attorney fGov't Code Section 551.071 :possible action. The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. Notice is hereby given that a Regular 1\'leeting of the College Station Planning and Zoning Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on the Thursday, May 03, 2007, at 7:00 P.M. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the day of April, 2007, at CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS sy Connie Hooks, City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website, www.cstx.l?ov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on April _, 2007, at and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: by • 4 • Dated this day of , 2007. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of , 2UU7. Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas Nly commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.eov. Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. • ~T' Crrti~ (~l~ C~~l,l 1~~:~;r--. S~ra~rlc»,~ 1101 Texas Avenue South, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 /Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM DATE: 20 April 2007 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Lance Simms, Acting Director of Planning & Development Services SUBJECT: Vision for the Wolf Pen Creek (WPC) District The City Council recently requested information regarding the vision for the Wolf Pen Creek (WPC) District. This request was made in response to recent Conditional Use Permits allowing • multi-family development in WPC. Staff plans to present this item to Council at their 24 May meeting. Prior to the 24 May Council meeting, Staff would like to provide the Commission with a brief overview of the history and evolution of the WPC District and solicit feedback concerning the vision for the area. This item has also been presented and discussed with the WPC Tax Increment Finance Board and the WPC Oversight Committee. The Planning & Zoning Commission recently requested information about vacant/ developable land in the WPC District. That information was shared with the Commission on 5 April 2007. However, since these numbers are relevant to this discussion, I am providing this information again: There are currently 59.7 acres (30%) that are vacant and held in private ownership in WPC. In the past year, there have been three Conditional Use Permits approved in WPC for multi-family developments, totaling 24.4 acres. Privately developed property in WPC is as follows: ^ Commercial - 29.5 acres (14.8%) ^ Office - 1.7 acres (0.9%) ^ Residential - 44.5 acres (22.4%) ^ Trail System - 9.9 acres (5.0%) The City of College Station owns 53.5 acres (26.9%) of land in WPC. These properties are developed as Wolf Pen Creek Amphitheater and park, the Wolf Pen Creek Trail System, the Arts Center and Fire Station No. 1. • 6 • r=~~,,~ ~ 7 ~~ ~ ~ ,4; -O 4? ~ N c''a ~ ~ N O ~ c V O L ~ O O~ .~ ~ _ ~ O crj c c6 O fl. (y +. r C (a O L N V ~ - >, d - ~ c ~ o ~ 4. -> > W W ~ ~ y 0 ~ ~ .N ~ .~ ~ O V L .C ~ Q _ ~ ~ Q. ~ ~ W c c .O C U ~ x c ~ ~~ cn o ~ 3 U ~ c o. t1 y o c a~ .o N a~ m ~ ~ O c o O ~ o m ~° ~ ~ c Y ~ O ,~ N . ~ Q +' ~ ~ c cB ca CT _~ ~ Q _ V ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C (1 ~ :+ V N . r~+ ~ N ~ c O c Y '~ O N 0 7 N ~ L N c ~ ~ ~ d N j ~ Q 3 O SZ ~ ' ~ cY0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ fl.. L O = ~ " ~- ~ ° to.a -~ ~ , ~ 3 C O C o ~ ° ~ O o c ° o N o~ ~ m _c ? c -~ M. .~ o o o~ c c Q cYa N c U E L c ~ m U N O a~ ~ m ~„ ~ a~ o c ~ ~ o m a~ °' .n o ~ -~ > a ~ ~ o ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ci ~ ~ ~ a o = y -o D. ~ m m ~ ~ o 0 0 ~ U Q o o ~ ~ m o o 0 ~ L ~ ,~ ~ -a ti o E- ca ~ > cn v ~ ~- Q o Q Q c c ~ ~ L , -~ Y ~ c .J U d Y '~ N ~ p . O ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ cV ~, Q ~ a °' m ~ ~ + ;° a a a d ~ ~ •~ -n ;~ - Z v, ~ °- ~ ~ o o a~ o a~ a~ o ~ O ~' O V C Q Q Q Q Q Q N ._ Q „ ~" N ~ ~ V - p ~ ~ O d ~ 0 3a ~ m M V V C E O M °~ O t(') r •-- m ~- M ~Y M r ~ t0 N ~a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = V (~ L N _ ~ c0 c0 f0 c9 (U (0 N f0 (0 ~~ ~ vI ~ V/ V/ V/ VJ :- V/ VJ VJ VJ VJ O C ~ ,' fA ~ fn ~+ ~ V1 ~ ~~ - >+ +. L ~ ~ C 7 U o ~ ~ _ y ~ +_ ~ c ~+ ° ~ E L v ~:rw U °' ~ n o . E n `- ' c ~ O N ` c . ~ N ~ ~ cn a ~ ' m o ~ U ~ ~ m c ° c ~ ' ~` ~ c a? m .~ ~-~ , a o 0 m ~ ,~,~ ~ a> m ~ > • o d. c o ~ a ° o` ~ ~ v '• N d o ~ o d w ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ -o ~ ~ c m ~ •` N c c ~ to O 'c N v~ c O 'O O N ~ O 'v'-i F= a oa.Em`~ ~ ~`Y° N ` gy m n a"i c Uo c o 0~0 ~ ~ c o c E c o c ~ ~ f° o_m ,. ,,, ~ L rn o L` h O o h c c c .U ° V1 v O c c cn 0 . N Q ~ N X ~~ ~ ~ Q > U ~ W U O ~ O 0 ,~. . ~ ~~ ~ ~ p rn 2 Z E N O ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~' +~ Q N ~ o y ~ C ' p Y C a? ~ ~ ~ O O +- c •C) 1 t t t ~ ~ t . +~ i a a i ~- c0 w N N X O U J ~ Q Z ~ fn F-- (n f-U d der WU ~, 0 O N N ''~' V! T N N Q r M ~ O m t~ ~ °' a • • ,,~~ -a d a ~' ° ~ o N O .~ a~ U ~ ~ ~, a ~ ~ - f£_i .: _ ,:a,~.. C O Q .a y d ~ _ ~ ~ rb O O 3 ~ O ~ C C C ~ ~ U ~ :° a~ a~ a~ ~ .Q o to L A N E E E ~ +' d Z ~W o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ t9 ' = 3 ~ 1 ~ a 00 .- ~ u, ~ , N ~~'O ~ ~ L L °= ° N ~ > ~_ Q Q Q Q ti o o c ~ , te a , ~ `~ ~' ~' ~ Q ~ _ o ~,~, ~ . ~ c ~ m Y ~ ~ ( ~ U 0 (n to O n ' ~ n ~ ~ !] xs a (~ ~ D ~ ~l ~ J rn ~ N Q ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ d ca a~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o W !r ~ ~ ~ 3 + U ~ a~ > a> > ~ 1 c O ~ _ ,,/^~ V/ t ~ Q Q Q ~ ~ iu ~'~.,.' ~ ~ -'. V . _ •~ ~ CC °' ~ N G ~ O ~ ' a U ,p m a d m c w ~ V O C E O N ~' ~- N U N ot$ ;t~ ' U t0 d ° n. v ~p ~ T ~ ~ ~ T ~ o T ~ ~ . .~ ... .~ .. .. .. c cv ~ r .. c`a cLo cLa cLo m .a.' ip ~ ~ ~ ~~` '' CA w ~ ~ > .r ~~ y.~ ~, ail,.-k~ ~ ' C ~ ~ ~ ` O ~F+ ~ ~ 1 N L C U d O O O N ?' V ` E N N N O ~ O E ~i ~ ~ _ ~ ~ V C _ ~ O +~ N C C ~ E _ N N ~ m C m ~ ~ ~ ++ a s N ~, ca ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~° `' ` C V ~ ~ ~ C . h p O ~ E U N ~ >, f0 m U 'O C tv m N a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ov c~ O a t c o~ • ~ ~ c c 'c e p ~ o "'~ N s - ~ ~ • > ~ N `~ ~ N f0 Q. N C V - o to C ~ w ~ rL-~ . L ~ ~ O N O ~ ~ p 7 C N L ~ C~ ~ 'C N <C ' C • O ~.~'o ~ U w o O V ~ cv c W E E > C N R1 ~ w- ~ .. C~ ~ y 0 - d ~ V~ N E ~ t ~ N ~ , w C 7 i V ~ 1 1 3 0 N +' N ~ N U 7 N to C N ' ~~ O ~ . p 7 ~ W fn U S'v U N ~ ~W O ~ ~ ~U „', CA fA "L O O C (0 tl (~ L_ O U C L N a-°i .~ a~ v N f0 y O .O t~ 0 O N N ~' 7 T a i1 M O N tli cC a ,~ a .a ~ ti Q+: °° °o ° °° ° °o d ' ~ N o ~ o ~ ~ ^ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' N U Q ~ ~ ~ _ N _ M M . d ++ t0 '~;.. . . ~ O O W '~ c .~ ~ u~ co _> > ~ ~ ~ ~ t /~ 4( y N O ~ O o O d >' .n •F~ Z ~~ o +~ c m c ~~' o_ (~ ~+ Y ° ~ ~ O O Q N j a ~ ~ ~ < ~~ ~ Z ~ o Q G . c ~ L C d d m ~- m a . ~ ~ =C) ~ ~ N UI ~ d ~ 2 m ~ y o Y -~ U = U ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ is +; ~ Z N Q ~ N N O O N N O ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ N ` ~ O •- O O O O O O ~ , o* ~ v ~ ~ ~ a ~ m U V ~ ~ O N N Ea> ~ ~ a cv ~ ~ a~ T ~ , _ ~N ~ o ~ ~ o E rte., txt' in cn IC ~ •y N = G7 ~ ~+ ~ ~ (/~ +`f t m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a i a i > •o •o ~ as ~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ` _ > U •.-' m N ~ '~ ~ E oo~ a °u ~^~` ~ 0 ~' ,~ ~ o ' a~ ~ a ~ _ U ~ c (~ ;$ ~ c~ Q t 'p ` ~ C ~ m ~ ~ c0 0 ~ c •- U ~ co L ~ -` ~ n co o vi •3 ~ U ~ o EfAcmE ~ y~. N ~ > ~ ~ Q L ~ N ~ •~ y U l N ~ E y ~ V y O 'p Z ~~ •C ~ N 0 C r ' O ~ ~ ~ a U U dtA U ~ O "~ Y C C ~ O O N U ~ c ~ N ._ E ~ o ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ a o ~~ ~ ~ •> U vi m a> ~ ~ o ~ Q Q 0 0 ~ >' > ~ U ~ O N U a ~ ~ C o~.«-m 'c ~ ~ c Q a~ U ~ > p C O N 'tn ~ (0 O_ C C > d a ~_~° ° ~ ~ ~ ~. a- ~ a ~ E c ~ O O N c > C U "~' N N R ~ ~ C (0 ~ d s a c~ ~ >. ~ ~ ~ E m o ~~ ~ ~ E rn as c a? -o ` ~ c ~° ~ c ~ -o °' ca c o 0 ~ Q.o a~ o~ c ~ •`-' ~ ~ `o m ~ > ~ U ~ L U m a c ~ o ~ a- y ~ c 0 0 m ~ cO1v o Wa d C Q•~ U ~ > O ~ U to ~ N Q '~ ~'' __=__ +°• •$ •3 •~ •~ •3 •~ y N O >N >O N >O ~ ~ ~ > > ~ > •y ~ N cM ~ ~ c0 rnrnrnrnrnrn D ~ ~ m ,~ ~ ~ otS co cu co co m co a:~.:: ~~~~~~~ 0 O N N "~ W Q rn M O M O (C a • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Lindsay Boyer, AICP Report Date: April 20, 2007 Email: Iboyer@cstx.gov Meeting Date: May 3, 2007 Project Number: 07-00500047 Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Phase 1 of the Sonoma Subdivision consisting of 29 lots on 8.533 acres, located at 2755 Barron Road. Applicant: Randy French, BCS Development Company Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the condition that Staff Review Comments are met. Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Final Plat for the first phase of a residential cluster development. The approved Preliminary Plat shows three phases. Cluster development allows lots to be smaller with a corresponding increase in open space. The total resulting density of the development must still conform to the underlying zoning district. Cluster development is allowed in all zoning districts. Lot sizes of this subdivision average 6,400 s.f. (6.8 lots per acre) with a total site density of 4.09 units per acre. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Comprehensive Land Use Plan identifies this area as Single-family Medium Density. The site lies adjacent to the freeway of William D. Fitch Parkway and the minor arterial of Barron Road. A bike route is proposed along this segment of • William D. Fitch Parkway, and a bike lane is proposed on this segment of Barron Road. A combined pedestrian and bike path is also proposed within the Greenway designation of this property. Parkland has been dedicated including a portion with the designation of Floodplains and Streams on the Land Use Plan. The parkland dedication exceeds the minimum requirement of 1.6 acres for the total development. The Preliminary Plat includes a total parkland dedication of 6.86 acres, of which 1.511 acres is included on the Final Plat of this phase. The Final Plat does comply with the approved Preliminary Plat and the Master Plan. It also complies with the Subdivision Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan. Item Background: The subject property was annexed in 1995 and subsequently zoned to A-O, Agricultural Open. The City Council acted on August 7, 2006, to approve the rezoning request to R-1, Single Family Residential and C-3, Light Commercial. The property has not previously been platted. The City Council approved a rezoning for 3 acres of C-3, Light Commercial on May 25, 2006, at the corner of Barron Road and William D. Fitch Parkway. The Master Plan for this residential development was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on August 17, 2006. The Preliminary Plat of the development was then approved by the Commission on October 5, 2006. Budgetary 8 Financial Summary: N/A Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board met on July 11, 2006 and recommended land dedication at the time of the Master Plan. Park development fees will be due for 29 single-family residential lots. • Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the final plat. The options regarding the final plat are: 10 • Approval • Denial INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: The subject property is supported by a 18-inch water main which runs along the north side of Barron Rd. The Master Utility Plan illustrates a 24-in water main to be extended along William D. Fitch Parkway. Sewer: The Master Utility Plan illustrates a 15-in sanitary sewer main to be extended from the east and through the property. Streets: The subject property is located at the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and Barron Road. Barron Rd. is shown as a minor arterial on the'thoroughfare plan. Off-site Easements: Will be needed for the extension of sanitary sewer main that currently exists in the Reatta Meadows Subdivision. Drainage: The subject property is located in the Spring Creek Drainage Basin, and will be required to meet all minimum standards set forth by the College Station Drainage Policy and Design Standards. Flood Plain: None shown per FEMA FIRM Panel 205D. However, the developer's engineer has illustrated floodplain on the subject property based on best available • data. This determination was made based on the City of College Station's drainage ordinances. Oversize request: It has been brought to our attention that the developer may be requesting oversize participation for the extension of some portion of the water and sewer mains. Impact Fees: Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer, $349.55 per living unit equivalent. Supporting Materials: 1. Small Area Map (SAM) and Aerial Map 2. Application 3. Staff Review Comments 4. Copy of Final Plat (provided in packet) 11 • ~;I'f~Y OF CO1..i.IiGE S7?cl'lON Pfunn~n; e.~lar+rdopmner Snvius (Check one) [) Minor [] Amending ~ Fine! [] Vacating ^ Replat (ssoo.op} (ssao.oo} (saoo.oo} (s4oo.o0} (Ssoa.ooi. 'lrticludes public hearing fee Is this plat in the ETJ? j] Yes ^ No FOi2 OFFfCF~~J,~ O~~ 1 `~ ~ P&Z CASE NO.: ~~"" `` DATE 3UBMr7TEU: ~ `,~~~~ ~~-~ Y ~~~ F[NAL PLAT APPLICAI'IQN i'he following items must tNa submitted by an established filing deadline date for pa,Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: X $300 - w600 Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $5.00 per additional sheet NIA $100 Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations {if applicable) X $200 pevelopment Permit Application Fee (if applicable). X $600.00 infrastructure inspection Fee (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) X P.pplication completed in full. N!A Copy of original deed restrictions,~covenants for replats {if applicable). _ X_ Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (P, signed myfar criginai must be submitted after staff review-} X_ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station 1 S.D. ~ X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. f X Two {2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). NtA Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks 8~ Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). Date of Preappi'ication Conference: June 21, 2006 AIAME OF St16DiVJSION SQNOM/~l SUBt~IVISION SPECIF1Ep k.OCATION OF PROP45ED SUBptVJStON (dot & Block) 2755 Barren Road APPt_ICANT/RRO,lECT MANAGER'S INFORMATiC?N (Primary Contact for the Project): Name ~C,.S ©evelopmer~t Compa~iCont~cf Name: Mr. RartdY French Street Address 4080 SH 6 .South _ City College Station ~_ State T x s Zip God+3 77845 - __ E-Mail Address rtrench a~stylecraft-builders.com Phone Number ~979La90~1222 ~! ,_ Fax Number _(979 690-Q348 C7 PROPERTY OWNI`R'S INFORMATION (~ owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet far muitlpie owners): Name ame ass above _ ~ J, ARCNiTEC7 OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name Mc lure 8~ er©wr~e En~ineerin~/Surveylings inc. Street Address 10D$ Woadcreek i]rive City ~o ~e Statiol~ State Texas Zip Cade 778A5 E-Mail Address DaleB~McCIureBrou~rre.com _ Phone Number 9[ 79l 693-3838 _ Fax Number (979) 693-2554 _ 14 • Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? Yes No X 1s there a temporary blanket easement on ttris property? If so, please pravicfe the Volume and Page # Acreage ~ Total Qroperty 8.53 acres Total # of Lots 29 R-O-W Acreage 2.30 acres Existing Use: Agriculture Proposed Use: esidential Number of Lots By Zoning Distract 29 / R-1 • Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 4.163 / R-1 Floodpiain Acreage -4- A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan andlor Preliminary Plat (if applicable): NIA Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Sarne: NIA Requested Oversize Participation: NSA _ Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: 104D Streets 680 Sidewalks 2790 Sanitary Sewer Lines '1106 Water Lines -Q Channels } 870 Storm Sewers -0- ~-_ Bike Lanes /Paths _-~1 Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $_ _ development fee _ # of acres in floodplain ,_ # of acres in detention # of acres fn greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 =$ (date] Approved by Parks ~ Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT .MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The a leant has prepared this appllcatlon and certifies that the facts stated heraein and exhibits attached hereb are true, corr ,and plate. undersJgned hereby requests approve! by the City of College Station of the above-identrflaed final plat aft # at t 's request aroes not amend any covenants orrestrktions associated with this plat. artd Date 15 • ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2 1. Please submit the appropriate construction documents and easement documentation for the off-site sanitary sewer extension from the Reatta Meadows Subdivision as illustrated on the Master Utility Plan. The construction documents cannot be approved, nor can the plat be filed until these items are resolved. 2. Please revise the engineers cost estimate as it reflects the lift station. The cost estimate should also reflect the off-site sanitary sewer extension from the Reatta Meadows Subdivision as illustrated on the Master Utility Plan. The cost estimate will need to be updated as that information is obtained. 3. As the terms of the off-site sanitary sewer extension from the Reatta Meadows Subdivision as illustrated on the Master Utility Plan are still unresolved the note on the construction documents stating "with separate contract" may not be appropriate at this time. 4. Please dedicate 10-ft easement along Barron Road, alongside the existing 10' H.O.A.C.A. easement, for electrical infrastructure. 5. Additional comments specifically related to the construction documents will follow as soon as possible, but will not affect the final plat going forward to P&Z. Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: April 25, 2007 • 16 STAFF REPORT • Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves, Staff Planner Report Date: April 10, 2007 Email: jreeves@cstx.gov Meeting Date: May 3, 2007 Project Number: 07-00500069 Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plat for Edelweiss Gartens Phases 10 & 11 consisting of 114 residential lots on 24.864 acres located just east of William D. Fitch Parkway and south of Eagle Avenue. Applicant: Steve Arden, Owner/Developer Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the condition that Staff Review Comments are met. Item Summary: The applicant is proposing to plat the subject property to continue the single- family residential development in this area. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The subject property is zoned R-1, Single Family Medium Density and currently undeveloped. Property to the north is reflected as Single Family Medium Density on the Land Use Plan, zoned R-1 Single Family and R-2 Duplex Residential, and developed as the Edelweiss Subdivision Phases 9 & 12. To the east the plan reflects Single Family Residential Medium Density and is zoned R-1, Single Family and developed as Phase 8 of the Edelweiss Subdivision. Bald Prairie Subdivision is also to the east. Property to the south is reflected as Single Family Medium Density, zoned A-O Agricultural Open, and • currently not platted but developed as rural residential residences. To the west of the subject property is William D. Fitch Parkway, which is classified as a Freeway on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. The Preliminary Plat is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Subdivision Regulations. Item Background: The subject property was annexed in 1995. A Preliminary Plat was previously approved in June of 2005. This amendment to the plat removes alleys and changes previously approved phasing between Phase 10 and 11. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: This development is less than three acres. Administratively, parkland of 1.455 acres and development fees for 114 single family lots have been approved. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the preliminary plat. The options regarding the preliminary plat are: ^ Approval ^ Denial INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: The subject property is located adjacent to an 8-in water main along Eagle • Avenue and Passendale Avenue. The City of College Station Master Utility plan shows a 24-in water main located along this property adjacent to State Highway 40. • Sewer: The subject property is located adjacent to an 8-in sanitary sewer main along Eagle Avenue and a 6-in sanitary sewer main along Passendale Avenue. Street(s) required for plat: The subject property will be extending Eagle Avenue, which is shown as a minor collector on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. Streets/Access: The subject property is located adjacent to Eagle Avenue (Minor Collector), Passendale Lane (Residential), and State Highway 40 (Freeway). Off-site Easements required for plat: None known at this time. Drainage: The subject property is located in the Lick Creek Drainage Basin. Flood Plain: None Oversize request: See Budgetary and Financial Summary Section. Impact Fees: The subject property is located adjacent to the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area, which is $349.55/LUE. Parkland Dedication Fees: This development is less than three acres. Administratively, parkland of 1.455 acres and $358.00/dwelling unit of development fees have been approved for 114 lots. • Supporting Materials: 1. Small Area Map (SAM) and Aerial Map 2. Application 3. Staff Review Comments 4. Copy of Preliminary Plat (provided in packet) • • ... Crr~r or COLLEGE S~rA7~10N Planning d' IkvdoPmtnt $erbicn FOR OFFICE USE ONLY P8Z CASE NO.' '~ GATE SUBMITTED:~~'" ~~' ? ~~ PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: X $400 Filing Fee N/A $100 Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations (if applicable) X Application completed in full. X Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. VIA Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed. N/A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks S Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). Date of Preapplication Conference: • NAME OF SUBDIVISION EDELWEISS GAf2TENS SUBDIVISION, PHASES 10 ~ 11 SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION EDELWEISS GARTENS SUBDIVISION APPLICANT/PR0.IECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project}: Name r Steve Arden Edelweiss Gartens Venture Street Address 311~ecilia Loon City College Station State _..~...... Zip Code 17$^~_ Phone Number 978-846-8788 Mail Address Fax Number X78-846-0652 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (~ owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name tSa,~.e as shovel ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name t~K.lure 8 t3rown~ noigaQrir~g/Surveving. Inc. E-Mail mikem(~mcdurebrowne.com Street Address 1008 ood k Qrive City ~QII~g~Statia~ State Tk Zip Code 7784.E Phone Number 979-B9~38~$ Fax Number X19.683-2:~4 .] 22 :~ Iota! Acres Of Subdivision 24.864 acres R-O-W Acreage 6.27 acres Total # Of Lots 114 Lots Number Of Lots 6y Zoning District R_1 ! 114 Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: R~1 ! .16 res Fioodplain Acreage None Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? NIA -Previously Submitted A statement addressing any differences between the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan (if applicable) None Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same None Requested oversize participation None Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ACREAGE: # of Acres to be dedicated # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE 1N LIEU OF f.ANO: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 =$ _______ (date) Approved by Parks r~ Recreation Board The applicant has prepared this appliCatlon and certifies fhat the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the Cfty of College Station of the above idantiffed plat and attests that ~ respective owners have been identiffed an this pplicati©n. .._.., Sign s bate • 23 • ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2 1. Please illustrate the 24-in water main adjacent to SH 40. Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: April 23, 2007 • 24 • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves, Staff Planner Report Date: April 18, 2007 Email: jreeves@cstx.gov Meeting Date: May 3, 2007 Project Number: 07-00500077 Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Sweetland Subdivision consisting of 1 of lot on 1.996 acres located at 3105 Freneau Drive. Applicant: Chris Galindo, Agent for owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the final plat as submitted. Item Summary: The property owner is requesting to final plat the subject property to construct a single family home. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Comprehensive Plan reflects the subject property as Single Family Residential Low Density. The subject property is currently undeveloped and zoned A-OR, Rural Residential. The properties to the east, west and south are reflected as Single Family Low Density as well. The property to the east is undeveloped and zoned A-O, Agricultural Open. The properties to the south and west are currently developed as single family and zoned A-OR Rural Residential, which is the Phase I of the Foxfire Subdivision. The property to the north is reflected as Single Family Residential Medium Density on the Comprehensive Plan and is developed and zoned R-1 Single Family, which is the Estates of Indian Trails. A • small portion of the subject property is reflected as Floodplain and Streams on the very north edge of the property that follows the creek (Foxfire tributary). The subject property is bound on the south by Freneau Drive. Freneau Drive is a public street for approximately one hundred feet and is reflected as a Residential Street on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. The remainder is a private drive. The Final Plat is in compliance with the Preliminary Plat and the Subdivision Regulations. Item Background: The subject property was brought into the City's Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) in 1971, and was annexed into the City in December of 1993. The preliminary plat was approved in March of 2007 as well as the rezoning from A-O, Agricultural Open to A-OR, Rural Residential. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: This development is less than three acres. Administratively, parkland dedication fee has been accepted for 1 single family lot. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the final plat. The options regarding the final plat are: ^ Approval ^ Denial • 25 • Supporting Materials: 1. Small Area Map (SAM) and Aerial Map 2. Application 3. Copy of Final Plat (provided in packet) • C~ 2s ,~ ~~~ • .- CITY OF COLLEGE STATION !'4tnxixx c'F' l krtlvpxuxt Srrui.» • (Check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending Final ^~ Vacating ^ Replat i 15300.00) (ssoo.oo) (3 0.00) t~aoo.oo) igsoo.oo)• 'Includes public hearing fee Is this plat in the ETJ? ^ Yes No The following Items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8Z Commission consideration. ,~, FOR OFFICE -U-$1E ONLY P$Z CASE NO.: I"? 1 DATE SUBMITTED: ;_~,~~ ~ N~ FINAL PLAT APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Mult)ple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet -~ Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations - $100 (if applicable) ~ Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) ~ Application completed in full. ,~ Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (rf applicable). Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. 7 A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). ~ Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks 8~ Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable)..SU.c-;.f~riz'rE-t~ ~,Yn fiF~f-xl~v~v OAS' ~~~., j 200; ~c%o s~`~vr- Tt? 1~E V ~ .s E~~, o,~/ sa ~t4E Date of Preapplication Conference: ~r~ % fT ~~~:~ /," J~,,y.~ ,~,~.~- ,~, ~,-~~X NAME OF SUBDIVISION L ~ ~ ~~~ •v~'S~'~r1 PA/.r>, SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot !3< Block) ~/~~ ~ ~i^Pi? Re! -r Lii; APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATIOffN (Primary Contact for the Project): Name l .~~~c ~~a/ ;t/~?.. ~ul ~~[f~1.~P...[':n' t~~c/ ~/~~~/~ ors Street Address ~ 3.3 ~~~P ~ STS 2/ 3 City _ /~r,~ ~,.-~ State TX Zip Code ~7 fI0 Z E-Mail Address Glir~i'S ~ Ct,Ptl. i-C. rp (- Phone Number~4J 86/6 - c'Qd~6cP Fax Number ~~~,.,~ p PROPERTY OWNER'S tNFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additfonal sheet for multiple owners): Name ~"P//n ~wgQ-~~ir+~ Street Address ~y~U 5'y Lrr,4~f'---j~~~. C~+" City .,,~,'tt~s:~'~~~ ~ State _ ~ ~ Zip Code --~~ ~- E-Mail Address car'~~.•.o,~,/~. .!~ ~ i ~l~'~?P ~17~~~ i./1sY1 Phone Number Fax Number .AA6~NFTE~E~R ENGINEER'S INFORMATIQN: Name C~ Street Address • SteOe ~.o Zip cede ~f78'a~ Phone Number _~Y'79~ 89a -S'~'~~7 ev~avos ..g.2'.1i~~L_~._ City -- 13rya~ E-MailAddre$s r' ~nc.~ Fax Number ''79 S4'6~t~ t ats 27 ~... `~ / ~,r. • r~ • Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? Yes No Is there a temporary blanket easement on this properly? If so, please provide the Volume and Page # Acreage -Total Property "/~ y~L, Total # of Lots / R-O-W Acreage Existing Use: ____(,~~.Lrr~..~ Proposed Use:_~~~°,Pn ~/ __ _ Number of Lots By Zoning pistrict / / ,'f - c1/~' / / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot t3y Zoning District: _~_ ~u .~ _.,. ~ ~ 996 / _~c'?F' ~ l l Floodplain Acreage ~ r17~,( A statement addressing any differences between the Flnel Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): /V Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations 8~ Reason For Same: _~/t N~ Requested Oversize Participation: _ iflG.,!1~" Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: Streets Sidewalks Sanitary Sewer Lines 75 ~ Water Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: j ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-;=amity Dwelling Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks 8 Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MU$T BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILINt3. The applkant has pr+spargd this appllcat-on and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto era true, corm and oDmp/ete. The underslgrfed hereby -t~quests apprava/ by the City of Colloy~e 5tatlon of the above Identd/ed lli~ plat and atteart3 that this request does not amend eny covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. Signatu ~~~ -~iiit',4~Cf~ 25,,E 2Z~0~' Date 2 ors 2s rn N 0 M • COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Nichols, Marsha Sanford, Glenn Schroeder, Dennis Christiansen and Harold Strong. ~~1 .. C:i r~ cif. ta>t i r.=,i ~ r~'.rtl l ,~'Y~I t7ru:1~ c (?Ct Yt.,f~lN r^+;f Se•aa:~a!,,•f COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Bill Davis and Derek Dictson. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: None. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Lindsay Boyer, Jason Schubert and .Icnnit~cr • Reeves, Tra115pOClallUll hlallllel' Kell FOg1C, Se11101' ASS1Slalll C Ily LIl`~Illeef AlAll (~Ibbs, Graduate Civil Engineer .loch Norton, Deputy City Manager Terry Childers, Acting Dilectol Lance Simms, Plaluiing Administrator Molly Hitchcock, First Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson, Information Services Representative Dan Merkel and Staff Assistants Lisa Lindgren and Brittany Korthauer. Call the meeting to order. Chairman Nichols called.the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. There was general d~'cussion on Regular Agenda Item 6. 3. Presentation; possible action and discussion of transportation project priorities and funding alterndtives. (KF) Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner, presented the funding alternatives for the transportation project priorities list. • 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update to the Commission on the status of items within the P&Z Plan of Work (see attached). (JS) MINUTES Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, April 19, 2007, at 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station,-Texas Jason Schubert, Staff Planner, presented the Plan of Work. April 19, 2007 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2 31 • 5. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding an update on the following item: o Update On Comprehensive Planning Process ~ To City Council April 12, ?007 Lance Simms, Acting Director gave an update regarding the presentation to City Council. 6. Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding the Comprehensive Planning process. Lance Simms, Acting Director gave an update regarding the Comprehensive Planning Process. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. No items ~~~er~ discussed. • 8. Adjourn. Commissioner Christiansen motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Sanford seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). Approved: John Nichol ~~."hairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services • April 19, 2007 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 2 32 C ~~ .~. C;I I l c>E ~,t?Ll E.~.i ti"7 ,;11[x\ 1'i~r+rnirrK c,% ~r)ra~r~c~p~a~rr~t .k'iTiit•,f MINUTES Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, April 19, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station,'iTexas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Nichols, Marsha Sanford, Glenn Schroeder, Dennis Christiansen and Flarold Strong. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Bill Davis and Derek Dictson. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Chris Scotti. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Stal~l~ Planners Lindsay Boyer, Jason Schubert aucl Jennifer Rec~~cs, Transportatiun Planner Ken Fogle, Senior Assistant City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Graduate Cis it Engineers Carol Cotter and .lush Norton, Deputy City Manager Terry Childers, Acting Director Lance Simms, Planning Adm-ntstrator Molly I-Iitchcock, Fu-st Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson, Information Services Representative Dan Merkel and Staff Assistants Lisa Lindgren and Brittany Korthauer. Call meeting to order. Chairman Nichols called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. 2. He~~ Citizens. No on'e-spoke during the item. 3. Consent As~~tda. 3.1 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Williams Creek Phase 7 consisting of 16 residential lots on 25.7 acres located at 9500 Rock Prairie Road. Case #06-00500214 (JR) 3.2 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Belmont Place Sec. 3 consisting of 3 lots on 5.1614 acres located in the general vicinity of the southwest corner of Longmire Drive and Birmingham Drive. Case #07-00500046 (JS) • April 19, 2007 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 33 C7 3.3 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. • Apri15, 2007 ~ Workshop Meeting Minutes ~ DRAFT • April 5, 2007 ~ Regular Meeting Minutes,,. DRAFT 3.4 Consideration, discussion and possible action on a reduest for absence from meetings. • Marsha Sanford ~ April 5, 2007 ~ Workshop & Regular Meeting Commissioner Christiansen motioned to approve. th;e Consent Agenda as submitted. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion, motion passed (5- 0). Regular Agenda 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. No items were removed from the Consent A~~enda. 5. Public hearin;~, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Rezoning ti~om A-U, Agricultural Open to R-1, Single Family Residential for a portion of the Needham Estates Subdivision consisting of 11 lots on 3.331 acres located at 14125 Renee Lane. Case #07-00500060 (LB) Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planner, presented the Rezoning and recommended approval. No one spoke during the public hearing. Commissioner Christiapsen motioned to recommend approval of the l~~~oning to Clty~.;,C'oun~fl. Commissioner Sanford seconded the motion, mbti~ passed (5-~;, <,;~ 6. Public h~~ring, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Rezoning for 3.611 acre ;.in >;he Castlerock Subdivision from PDD Planned Development District to A1P~~Administrative Professional located at 525 William D. Fitch on the northeast side of William D. Fitch Parkway across from Castlegate Subdivision. Case #07-00500063 (JR) Jennifer Reeves, Staff Planner, presented the Rezoning and recommended approval. No one spoke during the public hearing. April 19, 2007 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 34 • Wallace Phillips, College Station, Tc;xas; spoke in favor of the project and volunteered to answer any questions of the Commission. Commissioner Sanford motioned to recommend approval as submitted to City Council. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0-1). Commissioners Schroeder, Christiansen, Sanford and Strong voted in favor of the motion; Chairman Nichols abstained from the vote. 7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat of the Southwood Holdings Subdivision, Tracts A-1 and A-2 being a Replat of the Southwood Holdings Subdivision, Tract A consisting of 2 lots on 7.54 acres located at 1103 Rock Prairie Road generally located across from the Southwood Athletic Park. Case #07-00500061 (CH) Carol Cotter, Graduate Civil Engineer, presented the Final Plat and recommended approval. Ms. Price, 3021 Coronado Drive, College Station, Texas; Tim Stiff, 3015 Coronado Drive, College Station, Texas; Steve Smith, 2914 Colton Place, College Station, Texas; William Privett, 1 1 I l Rock Prairie Road, College Station, Texas; Nancy Badger, 3003 Coronado Drive, College Station, Texas; Daniel Bratwell, 2926 Camille, College Station, Tc'xaS; Rhonda Fazasky, 330> West Chester, College Station, Texas; Steve Rogers, 903 Carmella, College Station, Texas; Norman Luttheg, 2915 Camille Drive, College Station, Texas; Overall the citizens spoke in opposition of the development. Concerns were land use, safety issues, density, noise and traffic. Commissioner Christiansen motioned to approve the Final Plat as submitted. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 8. Fublic hearing, 'pf~esentatoi, possible action, and discussion on an Ordinance arri~tpiiing Chapter Y'2, City."of College Station Code of Ordinances, Section 6.4.E of t~~~ Unified Delopment Ordinance, regarding portable storage structures. Case #~7-.500004 (,~) Jason Schubert, Staff Planner, presented the Ordinance amendment No one spoke during the public hearing. Commissioner Sanford motioned to recommend approval of the Ordinance amendment as submitted by staff to the City Council. Commissioner Strong seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A • April 19, 2007 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 35 statement of specific tactual inforulation or the recitatiun of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Sanford asked for a future agenda item in order to discuss a status report or an update regarding changing the Platting process and what changes can be made. l0. Adjourn. Commissioner Strong motioned to adjourn. seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). Approved: John Nichols, Chairman Planning and ZOning Commission • Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services r~ Commissioner Christiansen April 19, 2007 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 36 (4/16/2007) Lisa Lindgren ...Request for Absence -April 19th. Page 1 • From: "Bill (George W.R.) Davis" <bill@pianoplace.net> To: "'Lisa Lindgren"' <Llindgren@cstx.gov> Date: 4/15/2007 8:44 PM Subject: Request for Absence -April 19th. Lisa and all. I thought I had submitted a request before, but I can't find any indication that Idid - so... I will not be able to attend the April 19th workshop or regular meeting of P & Z. I will be out of town on business (PhiladelphiaNalley Forge). Please consider this my request for absence. Bill (George W.R.) Davis, RPT 1006 Holt St College Station TX 77840-2621 (979) 695-1475 www. pianoplace. net • • ~~ 0.1'11' UP Ca)L.1.liliL 5'1'Alll)N Pla>snrng d Dnxlopment Servrcet 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 /Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM April 20, 2007 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Crissy Hartl, Staff Planner SUBJECT: UDO ADMENDMENT -Concept Plans • As stated in the Unified Development Ordinance, the purpose of the Planned Development District (PDD) and Planned Mixed Use District (P-MUD) is to promote and encourage innovative development that is sensitive to surrounding land uses and to the natural environment. The concept plan is a representation of how a proposed development meets the above criteria. The concept plan is required for all PDD and P- MUD development as a part of the approval process and currently required to be approved by the Design Review Board after zoning approval by the City Council. At the request of the Planning & Zoning Commission, staff has drafted an amendment to the UDO that would require concept plans to accompany a PDD or P-MUD rezoning request to the Planning & Zoning Commission for a recommendation and final approval by the City Council. Attachments: Proposed UDO amendments • 38 • LJ Article 2. Development Review Bodies Section Z.1 Clty Council Article 2. Development Review Bodies 2.1 City Council A. General The City Council will be responsible for final action regarding the text of this UDO and the Official Zoning Map. B. Powers and Duties As provided and established within the City of College Station Charter, the City Council has the following powers and duties regarding this UDO: 1. Appointments The City Council shall have the responsibility of appointing and removing any member of the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z), Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA), and Design Review Board (DRB). 2. Final Action The City Council shall hear and take final action on the following: Development agreements and oversize participation agreements for City participation in cost-sharing of infrastructure improvements; Conditional use permits; Zoning map amendments (rezoning); .,. r.; , ~-:.~ ~ :~~,~~~ f Text amendments; Comprehensive Plan amendments; Impact fee land use decisions and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) priorities; and Annexations. 2.2 Planning and Zoning Commission A. Creation The City Council shall provide for the appointment of a Planning and Zoning Commission and the regulations and restrictions adopted shall be pursuant to the provisions of applicable statutory requirements of the State of Texas. s. Membership and Terms 1. Number, Appointment A Planning and Zoning Commission is hereby created to consist of seven members. An ad hoc member shall be appointed to review impact fee land use assumptions in accordance with § 395 of the Texas LOCAL GoveRNMENr Cooe. Members shall be residents of the City and eligible voters. 2. Terms Terms of members of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be for two years or until their successors are appointed. Four members shall be appointed in even- numbered years and three members shall be appointed in odd-numbered years. Formatted: Indent: LeR: 49.5 pt, First line: 36 pt Formatted: Indent: Left: 85.5 pt, Hanging: ZZ.S pt, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 75.6 pt + Tab after: 100.8 pt + Indent at: 100.8 pt, Tabs: Not at 100.8 pt 3. Term Limits Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 2-1 City of College Station 39 • C~ • Article 2. Development Review Bodies Section 2.2 Planning and Zoning Commission Terms of office shall be limited to three (3) consecutive two-year terms or seven (7) consecutive years. 4. Vacancies Vacancies shall be filled by the City Council for the unexpired term of any member whose position becomes vacant. C. Officers, Meetings, Quorum 1. Officers A Chairperson shall be appointed annually by the City Council. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall select aVice-Chair from among its members as needed. 2. Meetings Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall meet regularly and the Chairperson shall designate the time and place of such meetings. All meetings of the Commission where a quorum is present shall be open to the public. 3. Quorum Four (4) members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business. Any recommendation advanced to the City Council without a majority of positive votes from those members present shall be deemed a negative report. 4. Rules of Proceeding The Planning and Zoning Commission shall adopt its own rules of procedure. 5. Minutes The Planning and Zoning Commission shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon each question, or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating that fact and shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be immediately filed in the office of the Administrator and shall be a public record. D. Powers and Duties The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the following powers and duties: 1. Comprehensive Plan The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make recommendations for the effective coordination of the various City departments, committees, and boards, in implementing the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Recommendations The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review and make recommendations to the City Council subject to the terms and conditions set forth for such uses in this UDO for the following: a. Conditional use permits; b. Zoning map amendments (rezoning); c. __ Concept~~i~ns foi_,(?laiinr ~ C,~.~y21< pr i_nr ~ ~~ti lets ~PDC~l a~~d Planrizrl_,i~lixcu U_ s„- ~istrct _(P f•1lJnu. rl,___ Text amendments; t__._Comprehensive Plan amendments; F___,_Impact fee land use decisions; g,=___Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) priorities; and Annexations. 2-2 Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 City of College Station 40 ii Formatted: Bullets and Numtiering Article 2. Development Review Bodies Section 2.3 Zoning Board of Adjustment • E. Staff The Administrator shall provide staff, as needed, to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. 2.4 Design Review Board A. CreatlOn A Design Review Board is hereby established by the City of College Station for the purpose of enhancing the City's ability to review sign, building, and site design issues, including architectural issues as specified in this UDO, by bringing expertise from the community to bear on these issues in designated design districts. e. Membership and Terms 1. The Design Review Board shall consist of seven regular members and two alternate members. Six of the regular members and the two alternate members shall be appointed by the City Council. City Council shall appoint the following to the Design Review Board: a. Registered architect b. Business person c. Landscape architect d. Developer or land owner in a design district e. Person knowledgeable in aesthetic judgment f. Citizen-at-large Of the members listed above, at least two shall be owners of property or a business within a design district, a resident within a design district, or an individual employed within a design district. The seventh regular member shall be the Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission or his designee. 2. Members shall be appointed for two-year terms. 3. The Design Review Board is a governmental body and shall comply with the OMEN MEETINGS ACT. C. Officers, Meetings, Quorum 1. Officers A Chairperson shall be appointed annually by the City Council. The Board shall select a Vice-Chair from among its members as needed. 2. Meetings Members of the Design Review Board shall meet regularly and the Chairperson shall designate the time and place of such meetings. All meetings of the Board where a quorum is present shall be open to the public. 3. Quorum Four members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business. Any recommendation or decision which does not receive a majority of positive votes from those members present shall be deemed a negative report. 4. Rules of Proceeding The Design Review Board shall adopt its own rules of procedure. Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 2-5 City of College Station 41 • • • Article 2. Development Review Bodles Section 2.4 Design Review Board 5. Minutes The Design Review Board shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote, indicating such fact, and shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be immediately filed in the office of the Administrator and shall be a public record. D. Powers and Duties The Design Review Board has the following powers and duties: i. Site Plans The Design Review Board shall hear and take final action on design district site plans 2. Wolf Pen Creek District and Overlay District Review The Design Review Board shall approve or deny any sign materials and colors in the Wolf Pen Creek District (WPC), and shall approve or deny all alternate building or fence materials and fence height in the Krenek Overlay District, as specified within this UDO. 3. Wolf Pen Creek Parking Waivers The Design Review Board shall hear and decide requests to vary from the amount of required parking in the Wolf Pen Creek District (WPC). 4. Northgate District Standards Waivers The Design Review Board shall hear and decide requests to vary from the standards to Section 5.6.8. Northgate Districts as listed in Section 5.6.8.14 Waivers. 5. Driveway Appeals The Design Review Board shall hear appeals to decisions of the Development Engineer regarding driveway appeals. 6. Appeal of Requirement Based on Site Plan Review Criteria The Design Review Board shall hear and decide appeals of the Administrator's application of site plan requirements to assure compliance with Section 3. S. E, Site Plan Review Criteria. 7. Buffer Appeals The Design Review Board shall hear appeals of buffer requirements listed in Section 7.6, Buffer Requirements. 8. Non-Residential Architectural Standards Appeals The Design Review Board shall hear and decide alternate building materials, colors, required screening, architectural relief elements, and parking lot concepts for non- residential structures, as specified in Section 7.9, Non-Residential Architectural Standards. Per Ordinance No. 2881 (March 23, 2006) E. Staff The Administrator shall provide staff, as needed, to the Design Review Board. 2.5 Administrator A. Designation The City Manager shall designate the Administrator for the City of College Station. Where this UDO assigns a responsibility, power, or duty to the Administrator, the Administrator may delegate that responsibility, power, or duty to any other agent or employee of the City whom the Administrator may reasonably determine. Deleted: and Concept Deleted: and concept plans for Planned Development Districts (PDD) and Planned Mixed-Use Districts (P-MUD). B. Powers and Duties 2-6 Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 City of College Station 42 C • • Article 2. Development Review Bodies Section 2.4 Design Review Board 2.8 Summary of Review Authority The following table summarizes the authority of the va rinuc review hnrliec and Graff ~ ~ CIIY., , ~; _ . . _ ., _ -• _ .. , , .. ,, Oversize Participation D R Development Agreement __ D RR R Conditional Use ermit D R RR _ Zoning Map Amendment D R RR Text Amendment Comp. Plan Amendment D D R R RR RR impact Fee/CiP Priorities D R PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Master Plans D RR R Preliminary Ptat D RR R Final Plat D RR R Development Plat D RR R Waiver of Subdivision Standard p RR R ZONING BOARD OFADJU5TMENT Variance _ _ ____ _ D RR RR R R Administrative Appeal __ ___ D __ ____ ___ R ___ _ ___ Zoning Map Interpretation D R DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Wolf Pen Creek District Site Plan A D R Wolf Pen Creek District Buildin /Si n Review q D R WPC Parking Waivers NG Waivers A D D R R Non-Residential Architectural Standards Waiver D RR ADMINISTRATOR Interpretation A " A D Sign Permit q D Site Plan q q:« D Administrative Adjustment q p Wolf Pen Creek District Building or Si n, Minor A D Minor or Amending Plat A D R PD Concept Plan Minor Amend. q p NG Roof Color Palette Amendment A p Alternative Parking Plans A D R BUILDING OFFICIAL Buildin Permit D Certificate of Occu an R D Certificate of Com letion R D R i `l~~-~ii ' G~ ~. y}' - _- Development Permit D Driveway Application A D Alternative Const. Material A D *Section 3.5.E Site Plan Review Criteria and 3.6.E Wolf Pen Creek Desi n District General Site Plan Review Criteria onl **Subdivision Regulations only. KEY: A=Appeal D=Final Action Decision.. R=Recommend RR=Review/Report Per Ordinance No. 2881 (March 23, 2006) 2-10 Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 City of College Station 43 Deleted: PDD/P-MUD Concept Plan .. [1] I Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.6 Woif Pen Creek Design District Site Plan Review • 4. Required Public Hearings The following table illustrates the types of review requiring a public hearing and the review body responsible for conducting the hearing. Comprehensive Plan Amendment X X Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) UDO Text Amendment X X X -__ - X Conditional Use Permit X X Subdivision" X Variances - ZBA X Administrative Appeals X * Only When regUlred per the LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE. G. Simultaneous Processing of Applications Whenever two or more forms of review and approval are required under this UDO, the applications for those development approvals may, at the option of the Administrator, be processed simultaneously, so long as the approval procedures for each individual application can be completed pursuant to the requirements of this UDO. Such processing shall occur at the applicant's own risk. H. Appeals An appeal of any final decision shall be filed with the appropriate entity within 30 days of the decision by the Administrator or the applicant. If no appeal is filed within 30 days, the decision shall be final. 3.2 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) Prea PPlica [i°n A. Purpose c°n`zren~e To establish and maintain sound, stable, and desirable development within the territorial limits of the City, the Official Zoning Map may • be amended based upon changed or changing conditions in a ~PPI~~.~t~<,^ articular area or in the Cit p y generally, or to rezone an area or "'b°'~"'I extend the boundary of an existing zoning district. All amendments s``'" R i shall be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be ev ew amended according to the procedure in Section 3.19, Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Fla nning a B. Initiation of Amendments Zaning Commission An amendment to the Official Zoning Map may be initiated by: 1. City Council on its own motion; 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission; city 3. The Administrator; or c°"""' 4. The property owner(s). C. Amendment Application A complete application for a zoning map amendment shall be submitted to the Administrator as set forth in Section 3.1.C, Application Forms and Fees. Application requests for a Planned Development District (PDD) and_f'i~rln~-,ri_ f I k,- t l1 [~ ~,tnrr (p r,11,n; _shall provide the following additional information: 1. A written statement of the purpose and intent of the proposed development; r 2. A list and explanation of the potential land uses permitted;.:r a 3 ~ ~ ~u ~.~ -- ~- --__ 3-4 Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 City of College Station, Texas • Deleted: and -:- _, I~Formatted: Heading 4, lustlfled, Indent: LeR: 58.3 pt, Hanging: l 27.35 pt, Space Before: 3 pt, Tabs: i 65.5 pt, LeR + Not at 58.5 pt Formatted: Bullets and Numbering 44 Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.6 Wolf Pen Creek Design District Site Plan Review • ~"', Approval Process Preapplication Conference Prior to the submission of an application for a Zoning Map Amendment, all potential applicants shall request a Preapplication Conference with the Administrator. The purpose of the conference is to respond to any questions that the applicant may have regarding any application procedures, standards, or regulations required by this UDO. If the Administrator determines that the map amendment request is not in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, he shall not accept the application for the map amendment, and no further processing shall occur until the map amendment is in conformity or a request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan eliminating the lack of conformity has been submitted by the applicant. 2. Review and Report by Administrator Once the application is complete, the Administrator shall review the proposed amendment to the Official Zoning Map in light of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the criteria enumerated in Article 4, Zoning Districts, and give a report to the Planning and Zoning Commission on the date of the scheduled public hearing. 3. Referral To Planning and Zoning Commission The Administrator, upon receipt of petition to amend the Official Zoning Map, shall refer the same to the Commission for study, hearing, and report. The City Council may not enact the proposed amendment until the Planning and Zoning Commission makes its report to the City Council. 4. Recommendation by Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission shall publish, post, and mail public notice in accordance with Section 3.1.F, Required Public Notice. The Commission shall hold a public hearing and recommend to the City Council such action as the Commission deems proper. 5. City Council Action • a. Notice The City Council shall publish, post, and mail public notice in accordance with Section 3.1.F, Required Public Notice, and hold a public hearing before taking final action on a petition to amend the Official Zoning Map. b. Public Hearing The City Council shall hold a public hearing and approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the application to amend the Official Zoning Map. c. Effect of Protest to Proposed Amendment If a proposed change to this UDO or rezoning is protested in accordance with Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government Code, the proposed change must receive, in order to take effect, the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of all members of the City Council. The protest must be written and signed by the owners of at least 20 percent of either the area of lots covered by the proposed change, or of the area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed change and extending 200 feet from that area. d. Review Criteria In determining whether to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the proposed Official Zoning Map amendment, the City Council shall consider the following matters regarding the proposed amendment: 3-5 Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 City of College Station, Texas I, u Deleted: .¶ I __ ........Page Break. __.. Formatted: Font: 9 pt Formatted: Indent: Left: 36 pt, Hanging: 14.4 pt 45 Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.6 Wolf Pen Creek Design District Site Plan Review • 1) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan; 2) Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood; 3) Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment; 4) Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment; s) Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment; and 6) Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use. E. Limitation on Reapplication If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another petition for reclassification of the same property or any portion thereof shall not be considered within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, unless the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that one of the following factors are applicable: 1. There is a substantial change in circumstances relevant to the issues and/or facts considered during review of the application that might reasonably affect the decision- making body's application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed in the application; 2. New or additional information is available that was not available at the Cime of the review that might reasonably affect the decision-making body's application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed; 3. Anew application is proposed to be submitted that is materially different from the prior application (e.g., proposes new uses or a substantial decrease in proposed densities and intensities); or 4. The final decision on the application was based on a material mistake of fact. 3.3 Subdivision Plat Review • ~ «~ A. Applicability 1. Subdivision approval shall be required (except as exempted under 5°em~~a~ the TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE) before any of the following activities occur within the City limits or the limits of the City's 5111 ae.,,•:. extraterritorial jurisdiction: ~~mo~ei~ness a. The division of land (for any purpose) into two or more parcels; "`""'" b. Development of a platted property where right-of-way for an identified future or additional right-of-way for an existing thoroughfare has been identified by the Comprehensive Plan; oa~.e aea.auo~ c. Develo ment on a arcef not reviousl le all 8oa0 p p p y g y platted; d. Development that involves the construction of any public improvements that are to be dedicated to the City or to a county within the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction; amn9 s e. Resubdivision of land that has previously been platted; or ~"' f. Amendment of any approved plat. Exemption: Subdivision of property that result from a governmental entity's land acquisition for public facilities such as expansion of street right-of-way. 3-6 Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 City of College Station, Texas • 46 Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.6 Wolf Pen Creek Design District Site Plan Review • 2. Any person who proposes the development of a tract of land within the City limits or the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City of College Station must have a Development Plat of the tract prepared in accordance with this Section. New development may not begin on the property until the Development Piat is Filed with and approved by the City. The Administrator may waive the requirement for a Development Plat within the City limits when no parkland, infrastructure, or easement dedication is required on the subject tract. Exemptions: a. When an applicant is required to file a Preliminary or Final Subdivision Plat by other requirements of this Section, a Development Plat is not required in addition to [he Subdivision Plat. b. The development of a tract of land within the City limits or the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City of College Station that meets all of the following criteria is not required to file a Development Plat: 1) The tract is larger than five (5) acres; 2) The tract has access; and 3) The development is asingle-family home for the use of the property owner or a member of the property owner's family, an accessory structure(s) of the home, and/or an accessory structure(s) for the benefit of agricultural uses. Per Ordinance No. 2941 (December 14, 2006) B. Unlawful to Record Plat Without Approval It shall be unlawful to offer and cause to be recorded any Plan, Plat, or Replat of land within the City limits or extraterritorial jurisdiction of College Station at the Office of the County Clerk unless the same bears the endorsement and approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Administrator as provided for in this UDO. C. Filing of Plat and Application For the purposes of this section, the date of filing shall be determined as the date on which the applicant submits a Plat that meets all of the terms and conditions of this UDO or has filed a variance request to those sections of the code for which the plat does not comply. Once a Plat has been filed with the City it will be scheduled for review by the Administrator and/or the Planning and Zoning Commission. • D. Platting in Planned Development Districts (PDD and P-MUD) If the subject property is zoned as a Planned Development District (PDD) or Planned Mixed- Use District (P-MUD), the,!:; r approve a Concept Plan that provides for general modifications to the site development standards. The general modifications shall be indicated on the approved Concept Plan. The Administrator shall determine the specific standards that comply with the general modifications of the subdivision standards at the time a plat is approved. The applicant or the Administrator may have the determine the specific standards that comply with the approved Concept Plan. E. Platting in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (Brazos County) The City of College Station and Brazos County have an interlocal agreement providing for joint regulation of subdivision platting in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction in Brazos County. The City shall provide the County with copies of proposed subdivisions, shall include the County in the plat review process, and in any site inspections as needed. Any plat for a subdivision in the ETJ shall first require the approval of the Administrator or the Planning and Zoning Commission (as appropriate), followed by approval by the Brazos County Commissioners Court. 3-7 Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 City of College Station, Texas Deleted: Design Review Board may Deleted: Design Review Board 47 • r~ Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.6 Wolf Pen Creek Design District Site Plan Review 3.4 Concept Plan Review (PDD and P-MUD Districts) ~°'„~ °::P°,`-~^j A. Applicability ~ A Concept Plan shall be required Planned Development Deleted: prior to District (PDD) or Planned Mixed-Use District (P-MUD), t; ~_ Y ~ ~ Deleted: any development S~of ~ •tM VIVw B. Application Requirements '~ - Deleted: of property zoned A complete application fora Concept Plan shall be submitted to the ~_ Rw.!•. „ _. __-r Administrator as set forth in -- Section 3.1.C, Application Forms and Fees, unless otherwise specified in • this Section. __~,. _ ,,.,,.,,,,. d ~ u :m C. Concept Plan Approval Process 1. Preapplication Conference i ;~ , ,, ,,:: t ~,.~.; Prior to submitting a Concept Plan, the applicant shall attend a ~ cow-ss;~^ preapplication conference in order to meet, confer with, and receive ~ -- the advice and assistance of the City staff. ~ ~ 2. Review and Report by the Parks and Recreation Advisory ~ ~ Board "`Y If the proposed area involves any required or voluntary parkland dedication, the Concept Plan must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommendations shall be Forwarded to the Deleted: Design Review Board 3. Review and Report by the Greenways Program Manager If the proposed area includes a greenway dedication as shown on the Greenways Master Plan, or if the applicant is proposing greenway dedication or voluntary sale, the concept plan must be reviewed by the Greenways Program Manager. The Greenways Program Manager's recommendation shall be forwarded to the Deleted: Design Review Board 4. Review and Recommendation by the Administrator The Administrator shall review the Concept Plan and recommend approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval of the same. Formatted: Bullets and Numbering ' '' Formatted: Font: 9 pt Formatted: Bullets and Numbering ..Final Action The shall review the Concept Plan and approve, approve with conditions, or Deleted: Design Review Board disapprove. Deleted: Design Review Board D. Concept Plan Requirements A Concept Plan shall not be considered or reviewed as a complete site plan application. The Concept Plan for the proposed development shall include the following: 1. A general plan showing the location and relationship of the various land uses permitted in the development; 2. A range of proposed building heights; 3. A written statement addressing the drainage development of the site; 4. The general location of detention/retention ponds and other major drainage structures; 5. A list of general bulk or dimensional variations sought; 3-12 Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 City of College Station, Texas 48 Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.6 Wolf Pen Creek Design District Site Plan Review 6. If general bulk or dimensional variations are sought, provide a list of community • benefits and/or innovative design concepts to justify the request; 7 The general location of parking areas; Deleted: ¶ I Paye Break ;` ,_,Open spaces, parkland, conservation areas, greenways, parks, trails and other special i Formatted: Buuets and Numbering i features of the development; and - -- -- -- --- 9. Buffer areas or a statement indicating buffering proposed. E. Rev iew Criteria The Administrator shall recommend approval and the approve a Concept Plan if it finds that the Plan meets the following criteria: Deleted: Design Review Board 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in Deleted: shall harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. F. Minimum Requirements • Unless otherwise indicated in the approved concept plan, the minimum requirements for each development shall be those stated in this UDO for subdivisions and the requirements of the most restrictive standard zoning district in which designated uses are permitted. Modification of these standards may be considered during the approval process of the Concept Plan. If modification of these standards is granted with the Concept Plan, the Administrator will determine the specific minimum requirements. G. Compliance with Other Regulations The approval of a Concept Plan shall not relieve the developer from responsibility for complying with all other applicable sections of this UDO and other codes and ordinances of the City of College Station unless such relief is granted in the approved concept plan. H. Owners Association Required An owners' association will be required if other satisfactory arrangements have not been made for providing, operating, and maintaining common facilities including streets, drives, service and parking areas, common open spaces, buffer areas, and common recreational areas at the time the development plan is submitted. If an owners' association is required, documentation must be submitted to the City at the time of platting to assure compliance with the provisions of this UDO. I. Modifications Any deviations from the approved Concept Plan, shall require approval except as i deleted: Design Review Board ~ provided for below. Unified Development Ordinance • 3-13 2/18/07 City of College Station, Texas 49 • • Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.6 Wolf Pen Creek Design District Site Plan Review J. Minor Amendment to Concept Pian Minor additions and modifications to the approved Concept Plan meeting the criteria below may be approved by the Administrator: 1. Minor additions to structures as determined by the Administrator; 2. Minor new accessory structures if the location does not interfere with existing site layout (e.g., circulation, parking, loading, storm water management facilities, open space, landscaping, buffering); 3. Minor additions to parking lots; Clearing or grading of areas not depicted on the concept plan as a conservation area, greenway, or park; and Final determination of the specific meritorious modifications such as setbacks, lot size, dimensional standards, etc., granted generally as part of the Concept Plan. K. Expiration of Approval The Concept Plan shall expire within 24 months of the date approved by the; A final, one-time extension of twelve months may be granted by the Administrator upon demonstration of substantial progress and the lack of changed or changing conditions in the area. 3.5 Site Plan Review P.~aoP„~;,,,~^ A. Applicability 1. Prior to development of any use or structure other than gapncaoon single-family (excluding Manufactured Home Parks), duplex, s~em~nai or townhouse residential development, a site plan shall be S,a,; approved by the City in accordance with this Section. "eV1F1° 2. No development described in paragraph 1 above shall be ~°^'~'ELe^"~~ lawful or permitted to proceed without final site plan approval. A site plan approved as part of a conditional use permit shall be considered a site plan approval. If the subject property is zoned as a Planned Development District (PDD) or Planned Mixed-Use District (P-MUD), the a~,,,,,,~~~,,,,~, approve a Concept Plan that provides for general modifications to the site development standards. The general modifications shall be indicated on the approved Concept Plan. The Administrator shall determine the specific standards that comply with the general modifications of the site development requirements at the time a site plan is approved. The applicant or the Administrator may have the determine the specific standards that comply with the approved Concept Plan. B. General Requirements All improvements reflected on approved site plans must be constructed at the time of development. All terms and conditions of site plan approval must be met at the time of development. 3-14 Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 City of College Station, Texas 50 Deleted: <#>An increase of 2s percent of the total number of dwelling units for residential developments as long as the maximum allowable density shown on the Land Use Plan is ,not exceeded;¶ Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Deleted: Design Review Board __ Deleted: Design Review Board may Deleted: Design Review Board • C • Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.9 Building Permit 3.9 Building Permit npprcar~°" Submittal A. Building Permit Required Staff No building or other structure shall hereafter be erected, moved, Review added to, structurally altered, repaired, demolished, or occupancy changed without a permit issued by the Building Official except in [omp~eceness conformit with the Revlew y provisions of this section and the 2003 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE aS adopted and amended by the Clty, unless directed by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or the Construction Board of Adjustments and Appeals as provided by this UDO. No Building Permit issued under the provisions of this Article a ;m;n9 for land use or construction in the City shall be considered valid otr;~~ai unless signed by the Building Official. B. Application for Building Permit 1. Applications for Building Permits for single-family, duplex, or townhouse structures shall be accompanied by one (1) set of complete plans, drawn to scale, showing the actual dimensions and shape of the lot to be built upon; the exact sizes and locations on the lot of buildings already existing, if any; and the location and dimensions of the proposed building or alteration, easements, and required setbacks. Applications for multi-family and commercial structures shall be accompanied by three (3) sets of complete plans, drawn to scale, including the approved site plan as required in Section 3.5, Site Plan Review. Additional sets of plans shall be supplied to the Building Official upon request. 2. The application shall include such other information as lawfully may be required by the Building Official or the Administrator, including existing or proposed building or alteration; existing or proposed uses of the building and land; the number of families, housekeeping units, or rental units the building is designed to accommodate; conditions existing on the lot; and such other matters as may be necessary to determine conformance with, and provide for the enforcement of, this UDO. 3. One copy of the plans shall be returned to the applicant by the Building Official after it is marked as either approved, approved with conditions, or disapproved and attested to same by his signature on such copy. The original copy of the plans, similarly marked, and the associated site plan shall be retained by the Building Official. 4. Where applicable, applicants shall submit information and materials required in Section 7.5, Landscaping and Tree Protection. 5. Where applicable, applicants shall submit information and materials required in Section 7.10 Non-Residential Architectural Standards. C. Review and Recommendation The Building Official shall review all building permit applications to determine if intended uses, buildings, or structures comply with all applicable regulations and standards, including this UDO, and approve or disapprove the same. D. Review and Action by Building Official 1. The Building Official shall make a final determination of whether the intended uses, buildings, or structures comply with all applicable regulations, standards, and the Building Code. The Building Official shall not issue a building permit unless the plans, specifications, and intended use of such building or structures or parts thereof conform in all respects to the provisions of this UDO and the Building Code. 2. If the subject property is zoned as a Planned Development District (PDD) or Planned Mixed-Use District (P-MUD), the ~.it f_,C ~ r~ I__ra~,,- approve a Concept Plan that provides for general modifications to the site development standards. The general modifications shall be indicated on the approved Concept Plan. The Administrator shall determine the 3-22 Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 City of College Station, Texas 51 Deleted: Design Review Board may Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.9 Building Permit • specific standards that comply with the general modifications of the site development requirements at the time of building permit. The applicant or the Administrator may have the determine the specific standards that comply with the approved ~ Deleted: Design Review Board Concept Plan. 3.10 Certificate of Occupancy A. Applicability A Certificate of Occupancy shall be required for any of the following: 1. Occupancy and use of a building hereafter erected or enlarged; 2. Change in use of an existing building to a different Use Category; 3. Any change in a nonconforming use or structure; or 4. As required by the 2003 INIERNAI IONAI BUILDING Cope, SecnoN 110. B. Application Once all required building inspections have been reviewed by the Building Official and he finds no violation of the provisions of the code, the Building Official shall issue a Certificate of Occupancy for the structure or use. C. Review and Action by Building Official Upon the request for a Certificate of Occupancy, the Building Official shall inspect the use or structure. If the Building Official determines that the use or structure complies with all applicable provisions of the 2003 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE and this UDO, a Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued. D. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Pending the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the Building Official. The Temporary Certificate of Occupancy shall be valid for a period established by the Building Official, pending completion of an addition or during partial occupancy of a structure and as provided in SECTION 110 of TNe 2003 INTERNAT7ONAL BUILDING Cooe. • E. Unlawful to Occupy Without Valid Certificate of Occupancy It is unlawful to occupy any building that does not have a validly issued Certificate of Occupancy or Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. Per Ordinance No. 2879 (March 9, 2006) 3.11 Certificate of Completion A. Applicability A certificate of completion shall be required for any of the following: 1. Use of a parking lot hereafter constructed or enlarged not in conjunction with a building or structure; 2. Site changes including but not limited to landscaping, parking lots, facade changes in a design district, or a change to an existing site that is not done in conjunction with a building or structure that requires a building permit; or 3. Site improvements associated with a telecommunications tower.Application 3-23 Unified Development Ordinance 2/18/07 City of College Station, Texas • 52 Article 5. District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards 5.3 Non-Residential Zoning Districts • 2. Additional Standards a. This section may be applied to any conditional use proposed in this district when either the Administrator or Development Engineer believe that the existing performance standards contained in this UDO are insufficient to address the proposed use because of its technology or processes and thus, will not effectively protect adjacent existing or future land uses. One or both shall so advise the Planning and Zoning Commission in writing. b. In such cases, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a hearing to determine whether a professional investigation or analysis should be performed to identify and establish additional reasonable standards. If so determined, based on the information presented at the hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission will identify the areas to be investigated and analyzed and will direct the staff to conduct the appropriate research necessary to develop standards for successful management of the new project. Any and all costs incurred by the City to develop additional standards shall be charged to the applicant and included as an addition to the cost of either the building permit fee or zoning application fee. C, 5.4 Non-Residential Dimensional Standards The following table establishes dimensional standards that shall be applied within the Non- Residential Zoning Districts, unless otherwise identified in this UDO: A-P C-1 C-2 C-3 M-1 M-2 R&D Min.LOtArea None None None None None None 20,000 SF Min. Lot Width 24' 24' 24' 24' 100' None 100' Min. Lot Depth 100' 100' 100' 100' 200' None 200' Min. Front Setback 25' 25' ZS' 25' 25' 25' 30' Min. Side Setback (A)(B) (A)(B) (A)(B) (A)(B) (A)(B) (A)(B) 30' (B) Min. St. Side Setback 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 25' 30' Min. Rear Setback 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 30'(D) Max. Height (C) (C) (C) (C) (C) (C) (C) Notes: (A) A minimum side setback of 7.5 feet shall be required for each building or group of contiguous buildings. (B) Lot line construction on interior lots with no side yard or setback is allowed only where the building is covered by fire protection on the site or separated by a dedicated public right-of- way or easement of at least 15 feet in width. (C) See Section 7.1.H, Height. (D) When abutting non-residentially zoned or used land, the rear setback may be reduced to 20 feet. 5.5 Planned Districts (P-MUD and PDD) A. The Planned Mixed-Use District (P-MUD) and the Planned Development District (PDD) are intended to provide such flexibility and pertormance criteria which produce: 1. A maximum choice in the type of environment for working and living available to the public; 2. Open space and recreation areas; • 3. A pattern of development which preserves trees, outstanding natural topography and geologic features, and prevents soil erosion; 5-5 Unified Development Ordinance 7/3/06 City of College Station, Texas 53 Article 5. District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards 5.6 Design Districts • 4. A creative approach to the use of land and related physical development; 5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets, thereby lowering development costs; 6. An environment of stable character in harmony with surrounding development; and 7. Amore desirable environment than would be possible through strict application of other sections or districts in this UDO. B. Planned Mixed-Use District (P-MUD): The purpose of this district is to permit areas which encourage mixing of land uses such as retail/commercial, office, parks, multi-family, and attached single-family. These uses are developed together in a manner that allows interaction between the uses and that allows each use to support the other uses. Within any P-MUD, residential and non-residential land uses shall each constitute at least twenty percent (20%) of the overall land uses within the mixed-use development. The remaining sixty percent (60%) may be any combination of residential or non-residential land uses. The residential uses provide the patrons for the office and commercial uses. The success of these mixed-use areas is directly related to the sensitive master planning of the site layout. The P-MUD is appropriate in areas where the land use plan reflects Planned Development or Redevelopment as a land use category. A P-MUD may be used to permit new or innovative concepts in land utilization not permitted by other zoning districts. While greater Flexibility is given to allow special conditions or restrictions that would not otherwise allow the development to occur, procedures are established to insure against misuse of increased flexibility. C. Planned Development District (PDD): The purpose of the Planned Development District is to promote and encourage innovative development that is sensitive to surrounding land uses and to the natural environment. If this necessitates varying from certain standards, the proposed development should demonstrate community benefits. The PDD is appropriate in areas where the land use plan reflects the specific commercial or residential uses proposed in the PDD. A PDD may be used to permit new or innovative concepts in land utilization not permitted by other zoning districts. While greater flexibility is given to allow special conditions or restrictions that would not otherwise allow the development to occur, procedures are established to insure against misuse of increased flexibility. A PDD should not be used to: • 1. Guarantee specific building characteristics within a development; Deleted: site or 2. Apply additional development standards to a single site; or 3. Vary from certain development standards unless community benefits outweigh the requested modifications. Per Ordinance No. 2902 (June 8, 2006) 5.6 Design Districts A. Woif Pen Creek (WPC) This district is designed to promote development that is appropriate along Wolf Pen Creek, which, upon creation was a predominantly open and undeveloped area challenged by drainage, erosion, and flooding issues. Development proposals are designed to encourage the public and private use of Wolf Pen Creek and the development corridor as an active and passive recreational area while maintaining an appearance consistent with the Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan. The following supplemental standards shall apply to this district: 1. Development Criteria a. This Section is intended to ensure that development occurs in compliance with the Master Plan for the Wolf Pen Creek Corridor. Pertinent to appearance is the design 5-6 Unified Development Ordinance 7/3/06 City of College Station, Texas .7 54 • ~. , ,~ ~,/~1 C:rr~ ~>rG~~i.tl~:~.S~r.~nu!: Planning d Development Service 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 /Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM April 20, 2007 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Lindsay Boyer, AICP, Staff Planner SUBJECT: UDO ADMENDMENT - 7.6 Buffer Requirements • The Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.6.F, Buffer Requirements identifies the type of buffer required for different adjacent uses. The proposed change uses the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for property that is zoned A-O, Agricultural Open and vacant when determining the buffer requirement. Currently, the buffer is based on zoning or developed use, with exemptions allowed for non-conforming and agricultural uses. This will not be changed, but in the case of vacant property zoned A-O, the Land Use Plan will be used to determine the buffer requirement. For example, a commercial property developing next to vacant A-O that is planned for Single Family Residential versus commercial property developing next to vacant A-O that is planned for Commercial. Based on the zoning categories, both situations would require a 15-foot buffer and a wall. With this amendment, the Land Use Plan designation will be used to make a distinction between the two situations. This situation arises due to City annexation where properties are required to be rezoned to the least intensive zoning category as a holding zone that may or may not accurately reflect the future development of the area. • Attachments: Ordinance Amendment 55 • F. Minimum Buffer Standards The buffer requirements are designed to permit and encourage flexibility in the widths of buffer yards, the number of plants required in the buffer yard, and opaque screens. Standard buffer requirements are depicted in the table below. DEVELOPING USE ABUTTING PARCEL* (Use more restrictive of the zoning or the developed use.) (Classification) Single-family Residentialt Multi-Family Residential* Non- Residential Single-familyt N/A N/A N/A Multi-Family 10 (1) N/A N/A Office 10 (1) N/A N/A Commercial 15 (2) 10 (1) N/A Industrial 25 (2) 15 (2) 5 SOB 50 (2) 50 (2) 50 (2) * Includes duplexes. t Includes manufactured homes, mobile homes, manufactured home parks, and townhouses. When an abutting parcel is vacant and zoned A-O, Agricultural Open, the Administrator shall use the future land use of the property as designated on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan in lieu of the zoning category in determining the buffer requirement. [number] Depth of buffer yard (i) Fence (2) Wall • 56 • . ~ ~, C17 ; UI~ (.~ r..LEt~;~. Sl',~rtc~~ Planning d Dee~elopnernt Servicet 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 /Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM April 4, 2007 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Lindsay Boyer, AICP, Staff Planner SUBJECT: UDO ADMENDMENT - 5.2 Residential Dimensional Standards • The Unified Development Ordinance Section 5.2, Residential Dimensional Standards sets out the lot dimensions, setbacks, density, and height requirements for the City's residential zoning districts. This amendment is to provide a note to the rear setback referencing Section 7.1.D.1.b as a reminder for developers that lots with approved rear access, the rear setback must be measured from the nearest boundary of the access easement or alley. Attachments: Ordinance Amendment • 57 • 5.2 Residential Dimensional Standards The following table establishes dimensional standards that shall be applied within the Residential Zoning Districts, unless otherwise identified in this UDO. zv o ~ -. a m N a M a a a ~ o n a in ~ C ~ c c~ ~ a v, Min. Lot Area per Dwelling 5 1 5,000 SF 8,000 SF 3,500 SF 2,000 SF None None Unit DU Acres Acre Min. Lot Width None None 50' None 35'/DU(E) None None None Min. Lot Depth None None 100' None 100' None None None ~* Min. Front Setback (H) 50' S0' 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) o j Min. Side Setback 20' 20' 7.5' 7.5'(C) 7.5'(C) (A) (A)(B) (A)(B) t; Z. Min. Street Side Setback 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' ~ ~ Min. S(de Setback between 15' 15' 15' 7.5' 7.5' 7.5' ~ u u `, Structures (B) Q v Mtn. Rear Setback (I) 50' S0' 20' 20' 20'(F) 20' 20' 20' ~ Max. Height 35' 35' 2.5 Stories/ ' 2.5 Stories/ ' 2.5 Stories/ ~ 35' G G 35 35 35 Max. Dwelling Units/Acre 0.2 1.0 8.0 6.0 12.0 14.0 20.0 30.0 10.0 N/A Notes: • (A) A minimum side setback of 7.5 feet is required for each building or group of contiguous buildings. (B) Lot line construction on interior lots with no side yard or setback is allowed only where the building is covered by fire protection on the site or by dedicated right-of-way or easement. (C) Zero lot line construction of a residence is allowed where property on both sides of a lot line is owned and/or developed simultaneously by single party. Development under lot line construction requires prior approval by the Zoning Official. In no case shall asingle- family residence or duplex be built within 15 feet of another primary structure. See Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements, for more information. (D) Minimum front setback may be reduced to 15 feet when approved rear access is provided, or when side yard or rear yard parking is provided. (E) The minimum lot width for a duplex dwelling may be reduced to 30 feet per dwelling unit when all required off-street parking is provided in the rear or side yard. (F) Minimum rear setback may be reduced to 15 feet when parking is provided in the front yard or side yard. (G) Shall abide by Section 7.1.H, Height. (H) Reference Section 7.1.D.l.e for lots created by plat prior to July 15, 1970. (I) Reference Section 7.1.D.i.b for lots with approved rear access. • 58 ~ ~ --- --------- ~ t ----------- ---------- -- Ekiatindp t3of7vn Rood ~- - - - - - -- ----------------------------- ---- ______-_ N. .W. MIdNr NMn N fl `J7'J9' E - 7.JUJ6' - ~ z 8 ~ ~, 98 - - _ _ _ n.o.w. 9.ek.Ibn i ~ >d - _ _ _- _ _ (0.055 km) ; 1•~n u y N 42']5'09' E -361.95' 10' H.O.ACA CI9 • 67.91' J ~ N 12']5'08' E- 279.05' / 1 I 110.41' 48.23' I 43.00' 45.00' 47.51' 10' H.OACA _ _ _, 1, JS.O' R I J8.5' N 4YJ3'08' E - 146.e4' I 172.40• 1 _ _ - VII al Z z cx ~ ~ O nt I.'^i I 1 1•••• ~o. VI ~ ~ z z ~ G ~ i. ~ ~ b i ° I ; ~ ~ • I '~7 Yr. $~ # '~ 'R' 0 8 I z I 1 I YP. ~• I pl t ~ ~I. '(. ~ ~ ~ N ~^ ~ Lj ~ ~ N 58'34'13' E ~ i 1 2 I \ [ °i ~ "• ~ v ~ + 147.9{' w I 1 ~` L v ~ >< r 0 >E I 1 1 ~ . o I °+, I I p~ \ 00' l ~ ~ ~ IM 9 I 1 ~. a~ ~.\ NQ17 ^ ~~o, ve'yJ i ; ~ C21 `\~ 3 m i$ u.l / 1 ~~ pT ~ I IJ.~~~848 E~~ ~ .~ ~ ~' N 3971'13' E ~ g ~ 1 1 1es4• 4s.oo' 497s• l' ' I U I i ~ I v~~ # R I / \ \ `~ `6• N 4525'20' E ~ L ~ ~ V I / ~~ I a $ $ Aiexonder bbiiQy Lbuif N 397i1S' E ( =I ~ I A I J'/O' R.QM " 77' Pol+npnf m a 110.]6' 1 I ~ ,8 a 1 I N 27.p107• E •, C7 u O ( @ 1 'S N 4]'23'29' E ~ ) ~ ~ ~~ 1 11~ I 129. g, a 21.19' sear 4s.o1' 2e.42' ~e = 8 ~ ~ ~ `?' 1 y I v~00' E.10.~ m A~ N 197{'IS' E ~) ~ -~~.~- .-l I O i ~ ~ j i~ 158.01' I ~ i ~ ~ 1 I ~' ~~ w O I+ 11 g ~ 1 I L z z z : L"i NO I '" 1 ° 1 I yr` o ~ ~ v ~ + + I8 1 •• ~~ ~ ~ I y1yy y I ~ y4~y IO ~ ~ O a :3 v ~ ~ ~ ~°y1 W ~ ~ # ~ ~~ ~ N ]974'15' E I I I o ~ ~ y~ g ~ (1~ 1 I +' ~ y 4 33a8F ^ ~ ~ ' g ~ u7.4s' I 1 I ~ v i u 1 I ~ ~ ~i O to h' I $ ~ I ~' al i3 I L--- -- 10' P.U.E. Bloc 2 =+. ~ 0 ; I ~~ -- -------- _ _ 1S.2J' ~`, N J974'iS' E I X11 g 1 45.71' --- ----- --- ____ __ 710.79' 57.07' 45.00' - 15.00' 45.00' N 42Y7'S2' E ~ ~ '0 135.]4' I s I ~ g 5 1 S '11?:T! LlT' W- JadCO' z _ 9 1 - - - - - - - I 45s7' - } s0• a.a.w. O W ~ j ~ S I I J gpu S' P.U.E. } ~ p I g g ~ 1 "' 2 v N J974'iS' E I ~ I 1 {' ~ t 152.75' I 1 1 1 ~~ ~n ~ ~ u v is~ 1 I ; ~F a 1 O ~' 8 1 1 I~11 I ~~ ~ O N J974'IS' E I t I I a ~ ; 129.58' 1 \ 1 '1 ~3 '0,1 + \ ~ g C t{ +p ~~ $R P ~ i ~ ~~ E ~3~~ b ~ / \ ~~ 5' P.U.E. g \ ~1 ~i n ~ n N 55'02'10' E ~ \ { \ 1• ~~i~ ~ m ~ °:~ .. .M. .^S .. N -~~#a y^ 41.79'.-- 150.79. 1 ~-gz ~~ ;~Yl~z ::3_"~_ g3" ~s.~8 ~~A q> ~ ~ ~ 9~t" ~,,.' N4JR1'JI'E ~ \\° ~\\ cc~~ _ ••• + a ~ 1e~3 ~ v~p ~ 6 u ~2~ ~gzIM.C~B"~R~R~~~Ij"R9 g ~'~~gy 1F~g ~2~% ~ I ~g ~ ~ O u \~ ~~.~' ~g g y g 8" ~ SiM9r Ook Onbb a ~ 1 _ • ~ s~o i + 3g ~ S ~ ~ $ ~ .tv',taw...7r m !" b 1 _. ~ • '~~ gib ~~~~~';~~R~KeS~d°~~' $Re~r ~~~g ~~a=~IS a~~ >o A+Itt. ~ ~~6pdtii _ T \ Ai~9 '8. '~q1 •• ~2 ~ >F3f naE t ! f A 2A q@ ggg \ U N4J21'JI'E ~ 9~~1C1~' 41 \~ ` • ~g~ ~~ ~A R RR R +~R~~ ~ g ~~~~~~ i" 3~9R ~ a 4S.Or ~~~ i ~ .36e \~'•~.\• •. 2s.1e' ~~ cg ~°g ° eta? g ;£~ %A ~ 5'~ o- ~ ~ _ iy -` .. \ ~". pp S gg~ $S R ~ RN~$$ ~ P~d4~ ~x ~$~x°~ .# ~ ~ b O # L4`tN \\ 1~\\\ •J Q~ ~ ~ ~q 4 40. A 3 yp~ 2 ~ ~ $ &+ ~ ~ ~{ '$• i 910 `yE1 \~~~,\ •• py 9y T m° g~d~ ~ q~° ~j n5~~~ ~ z P \\ \ • +~ ~ ~ ,~Pg ~~g g3 3 gg ~ a~w's~ ~! ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~e ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ v a r = ~ u ~v ~ M •y~l~'pL s ~` Qy ITC i¢ ` • a"' 6 6 °R S ~ a g .f~81 ~ ~-~~ a 7' ~ ~ l~~ YiEt' `\ o as s ~ ;s9. a- g~. a ~a B10 3 $ 7 ¢ q~• IO' P.U.E. Op O+ S 11 ~~"s 5 $~. ~. ~ ~~ ~~ 2. ~~ ~ ,a,8 ~s' $ 3g$~g 4s.o4•-- - 69.91'-- 1~ 1 ~ K 1 a ~~ $ $ g $ g $ ~ f• g I s.xv~rvs'w- n4~ee' is ~ ~` 11 6 ~~ 1 ' ~ sS I 1 \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / 1 ~~ i ~~~~A~~~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~§~sg ~~~ r 111'" a g ii~SS R ,q ~~ ~ RR g g 1 A. al\ ~ 8 ~ 6 ~~~ ~ g ~~~~ ~~ ~ g $~ ~~~ ~ ~_ I.g a ~ 2~ R ~ I g~ i~~g 1 2 S ~~~~~ o [ R~~ s N 0 ~~ ^~ nm I~pp 0 a~ yy~ ti v a O ^^~~ v ~ ~ w Q ~~3 _ ~~ o~ ~ ~" ~ 2 ~v ., ti ~ ~ Y '~ So ~~ ~~' ~ ~°v o~ ~~~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ O Q e h Y ~ ~~ w ~ mu+ . }+ N a(~n OO nn nOAn (]finnn ~S'YO JNU •4N ~01Om VpN~~~•i+ vx~ i^F~ m00 tit ~~~~~ ~ P~~b r aa ~g g g g §~i ~$j o ¢~~. q NyNR{y4 N 4Yy~y yNq k 111 ' ~ ' "' y , .Y ~ p ~ g, ~ ~ 2 S ~ g g ~~~ GSSSB"'~8~ f+S,o~~-~"U"d~o~'(~5 8355• $$' s$s$~$~g $ B 8 GGG.GG~~ C $ ~i'~~ ~~ J \\ ~ C~13 222 ~, ~. ~~ 8 S a ii/~ 1111 t~ooq ~~~~ ~, 8333 hall ~~ q i ~~~ A 9E TgYYY~Vr Yla 7q 8 ~° J '8 t8~8 yw •• btJ.p t~[?1~ Qq~~NbVV~f~~°Ory~A'SPINpNi ~'t°i°~ RV RN~$~~~~~i,n iB,$~~~i. Si.~T.ti ~ N2ZU yi irN ~Y~~R~.i, 31]1 ~ g s ~ \• VVVl~ e~ ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~... ~ ~ ~ * ~QK y _ ~ ~~oi [ a, ~' .~~Z~r~~ g ~ p CS6~Ry~+~F>a6lSS$~~3gS8~Yu4 NN~.4sR~~I=~1 _ _ ~ m m : P+ mm8&'"aS~ 9 ~ Q 6 ~,~ $J ~8 s $ ( ~ Q~ $?RvA~ -1 ~^^% ~ g ~~ zY1NNYINNNZNNZZNYINZZNUYI ~g~QR$R g~~°~4g $~x$ (~A~p L ~~IdG.N$}t 1144 Q ~ ~ ~ ~ g $ p . G et~aa:,~a~ixw~;;uy~~NNm ~ /~ V ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ p ,T ~j ~ 1~ 1I ~t i " mn>Enmm~l~nnf t>F llnm[nlnn ~ B ~ ~ g ~ g '~$ ~ ~ t ~ k8~~~~~~ 'vol;;~aY S~"~GL ~Id ~ N ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~$~ 2~ , , ~~. ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ N57/iom D. Fitch Por/cwaY (State Hi9h»'OY No' 40~ fHun,14' NbNr LBe~ ' (m «ee~am.•. ro Gb.a cwy. srotbni :wars ueLnq rxmJ " ~ ~ ,' .... __... . I ..... _.'- %~~ . _ - .. _."• fro ea eax ey omr:J - -. _. _ .. _.. _. _ :d :a•ern: ~. _ ~ _ N /111' W - ~ a - -_ ~ ::.161,5 •3,,J~•-- ~ r s I ~~ ~ ro -'a-' ~ 07' N I911'f4' W 1JT.f1' ... _ ss ~ r ,u ~ - - r ex - - .n. -~ ± /' ss r.o« e.o.. N I9'15'S6' W ._ A/ 51'07'!5' W - J9I. r ~ ~ . e' - ss• r ~SSe + r µ w• . r ex .. r s. - _ _ ... - _ - _ T _ - - - ee' - __ ___ --_ 1 li: a\ _ _ _ _ _ ^` ' .. " ~' ...11.x.GU'~; Ct~ ' ~e.' sY- i j~ _ -'.'- r -- -__- - O~ -- 20' P.U E. _ ~J ~ . - ru- - - - ---- ' ------- J s '. a ;' ,. a u _ -' ~ - 1 ~ ~ 1 -- _. __-- 7Y ~ ..__~ ~~ 1 ' I ' i-' ~ - ^ ss' fie-- -aa~- -. ~w .--- _O.'" -/ I I 1 E' a L'`v 1 __ e l o 4" • . 6W---~~_-._..i--.._..---._.. _ may" / - "I8 ~ ~ -+---'- jt if Loop - oucou - ~ ~t , -.-- ~ 65 I / _-_.---._.----._. - c ,~ W,~ r a r-.« L~ ~ I o--------as <-- ~ - ss- e~'" I I - ~ 4 w - IR 2; ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - mss- / ~ ~ # " I - ~ -- - ei l b ' $. ~ ' / I 4_ ~ b . ' Y ~ 1j ~ I ~' ~ o ~ O ' I 'w. _, v .. # % v G ~ N / y V ~ v w,~' i vlc b / ."+ 1~ d` w I~ ~ 1 i E ~ f t.::~~ ~ 4 ..-' _- I -~' ~ ~ _ / I O I e0M•0e I ~ :. ~- -_ .." _~-,= -;ss-- -ss• ~. .ro. .- ~60' _ _eo' .. ia__ = __ - _--_ ~ >nl~ I~ ~ i' 'E. g , __ ~ ~ _ y ii,, _~ --_-- - -- _- T i I.. ~~~ r, eY' ss- / 1 IBL01r 20' P.U.E / ' I ~I ~, ~:.:, •. 1.'~- 3 , i ~ , ~ :ar °v,' L 20' P.U.E. .... . ti b ~ I ~ ~ ~ / - w ~ ~ V I nl ~_ •` ~ o ~~ I iy' ~ `b ~ '~' O v b. v / v / I I bc... e``,,, ~ / w I .. ! ,~ -.. ,. ~ - a ~ - I Ins' .a`" . ~ L.~---r.4e / . A fr Y ~ G ' ~- '~ ~ ~ r ro ~ _ -_ - --- _ - . I~ __ I ew----~--e .6w`- '° COU/f LO/Je -' R'' ~ .. ' - ~` _ - .. i~ \. ~ ' i~ i I~ _. - ss. ~ .. `-5 65 _. I f Ll I I r l ~ b ~ ~~,,' ~. - I' /~ ~ ] , -' V v w ', ~ _ ~,.,' I c~ ~ r. _ ~ i I ` Im ~ ,% 10'P.0.E. - - \ ~~J L ro,~_ __- -_°°•t~ ~ eo-~- n~_ '~~il ' 1 I __ e~' - -'- ---- - -•- --- I . - _ - ---- - _'j= ~_~ -~-=- °° ~_ .~~ --- - ~x b ICI, T , -- - -I r 22 , i ~- _~ -- --~ - 0e BcoC ,` xY I .\ ~ o ~..=~ _ ,' S 51'1111 E ^ 'JJR 1~. . ~ ` ~., 1 1 .«~ I ~ ' ~ ~ 1- I \ ~ ~ ~ , I I ~ _ 111 v ' _ ~' I v - w "4 ~ w ~ ;i, @. ~, ~ I ~. _-_ ..-. es~'r , ' I ',8-~ '; ! i ;' ~ ~ ----~ Lam' r"T --__ - _i[L-m.-~JO-' - ~ ~.-.- ~ N~ , t Oh i i ~ I , ,' % 1 / Loplbermon ~~=^"~`~ ~ ~--- -- a„ __._=`~ --f c f Z~v eo , . ~ M .ZZ,l1.1S N ~ °WT--`e -- 1 ~ ~ / / -~.- ~ ~ ee ro, I I : ~/ etc' ~ ~~+: / ~ I 4 ~ ye I ~ w w y. Y , , ., O v ~ - i r-1' ;~,' ;'~..~. ~~ ~ I '~ ,tar I~. n« ~v v ~~~ ~ ~ _ ~~•~ ~ 30+~~~ b ~8' K\ _ BLOC ~ ~ ~ ,ee~ d` ea, w - 7 e .~. J1 L___,_ .' .E ~ n ~ ~ S . ~ai.A ~ ! ,. / / Oe xb' /r~.~ '~ ~ 20' P.U.E ~ y»,m.a ~ ~ I L S - $ ~ ~ ~~' m b ~~ u~ tlii i ~ I lu / - c~l ~' / tip, c/ O b v v / ~ I ec ~~ . .' g ~^ / .a ~.: ~ n / I 1^ / I w woW / II / ,; ~ ,, ,; ~ / a,~ o / r / ~, ~~ I ;1 --- - - ~, G, 1c~ I _ _ _ _ _.... \ .., ' ~ / ,'" ~ 1 / N / ~ ~ \ ! 6S-w-_ 135w~_ _'b.S.- eo'-"~_ _°-s~ / ~ N J 'K ~I i C ~ __ __ ___ --__. _ ' L ~ ee: - p ro• _ __ o` ' ~ ~. ~'. 15 F.D.E. ~, ~ _ , a I Toumoy Lone ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' = __ ro' I ro" ' ,ri' ' C`' I I , tt,~~s i^ ~ IJ IN ' .'' O. I Q Y i q 4 b ,. / / /. 2 , J I _ - a` ~' u, - .. _. .... ., .. ~ ~ ~ 10' P.u.E. _- __J L=-- __ x.17/ ~ 'I $ _ w• - . Y _._.. ..... .., - .' .._-, ,' I. .. b ~ __ ~.- ,:::.: ro. ---- _ _. S 51'1112 E - 51.E ~ [r- _ a.. ~$, ~'~,~ ~} c ~ ~ ... a ,~ ~. ._ ~~ . .. -. ~ ~ ~ ° w t1 ~ fv - a b 1 / , .. .._ A l W ti p G i ` ~x "• , 1 ' 1 m / I , ~ _ :: ', _ RR 11'' _ 9l ~, t Fyc r `-_ `.. ~~ggii ))yy g p .. , / ~, . i p ~ bad _ ~ . \. _. ~ , ,. "", r , \ ...... / ~ 1i. ern e~U ,rL I \ 0 b O . d \1 t r..... , , .` r dp . ..... \1 ., 1 .... ~ ~•. 4 N-. _ _ _ 3 * _ ~ t ~ ` It o~N I` ' ~ J " , u a ~~ 4 a '. ,off'` ~ ~~ '.. q ' ~>t'= ~ YC F~'<$' • ~, a~ ~ hV O ~.aNs~ ~ s J 1~ «~'IUJJ pp ~~ Ily ~ ~ Sa~mo~ m m ~ a u w N~ A`~ y ~ ~ O _ JJ SC ~ k'; a°~ I^^, i t~ a . 52 g. !y N -' soL. Hw^ m ~o rh ~'aq ~ ~^Oi V ".l~ ~ 8 e ~k~'s 3~' S~ 74§ ~~S$ gya (~~ ~ nQ a~ N~ ~ ~I~~, ~ GGGG.GG~m ~~'~~6 II ~ ~~~~ ~ ¢~2. n~ 5 S 1 Y' i11 r^ v,N U,azu„az tl 5 A 4 2 ~ ~ ~ rv! . I I ~ Ye'~~ ~ ~ eE e ~ ~ ~y ~ ^ ~ ~ Sd_S~„~q ZBxy°~ YW11 s °C ~;3~ °~+a 8 ~i~" ~ ~ ~/~ ~j~ _ R ~ A ~I Y ~ bru ~ 1 ~ ~.1~ ~ CIC:J 8°'m o`6SS~ ' u 3~~ vvo~ +~ Y~v ~~' ~ ~~eeo~~R~J `j `...a.... ~.. _. 3 - O (D ~1 83tl .888 iazLaz:~ ~ 444 ~~ g a8 ~~ x~~,a3 ~ ~ V a r ~ L"~ $~, s.»~ 3 x w Mrn s s- ~V ~QN~~ R €~ ~ ~- s ~~ ~ a. ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ `~ =~ ~ ~ ;; °0 W 8 ~ ~ '. ~~ ~ i ~ z~°~ ; ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ C~ `~' <D ~ co o "' U W W ' W 0 = f1. N a C12 ~ I ; I \\\\; i b / i I i I I ~ ~ • ~\ ~ \ (V 91` \~ ~~~ ~\ ~~ ~~~ \ ~-_ 02 ~ =~ ~'` ~ ~~ 4 ~~ ~ ~07 ~ ~ ~~~ .h ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~3~~ :~~i~~~ I11111111111111111111111111111111111 N` ..~~~«.eeQtd~rraa~c.,es3s..;p~e~~s~A~r~" 3 / ~ ~ n ~ 1 ~ \ ~@~. 44 qrqr N ~ ~ __., 'b of 8 ~ \ \ m ~R~3 1 //~ •S ,, ~ ,~ -,qi`,- ~ ~V ~ i~ i ~ ~~~ ~ r J ~ / ~ ~ $ ~~\ 6~ Sit /~ 1 //~ \~ o~:S ~\ lL I 2SCC ~ V1C 60 ~ / ~/ ~ / / ~, I ~I W ` \ ,t / 1 i~ ~ V' 8 ~ ~ '. ~ ~. o / ~~~ pppp8 0~ i ' n \ / \ , r~Oy1~ ON ~ m ~ ~ \ `/ np N o ,~ ~~ ~~~ ,,~ / ~ ~ ~ ~Qy ++ / I ~ i ~ ~.--. ~ cb ~ ~ J 1 I I i~ ,= 1 ' \~ m wp II ~ R / ~ fi~~ ~ n i~~~ ~,b\ s~ w~ \ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ d~ F~ ~ ~~," 8 i r- x ~ ~ l { - ~~ o n y ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~' j ~ ~ ~ ~ a j =-m= ~~ q I~~ ~' ` 1 ~ / i~' ~ ~/ i,e , i I I, ~, I I ~ ~~ i I ~ I \ " /~ ~ ~ I t ' et / \ ~ ~~ ,~% _ f ~ r ~ es _r i ~~ ` \ / ~ ~ \ ~ ~~ ~~ 3 ~R \~ ~~ .+. 0 <~ r~~a x Uo~ I I ~~~~ j I ~'i: ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ _~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~" G~"~~~ I ~~ a ~ ~~ i A ' ~ ~ s a n ( N~ ,~,~ ~°~ 'g ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~I ~ a ~~~ ~~ ~ z_ ~ ~3~ ~ ~~ ~ °aff ~ d ~~ ~~ R ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ I 1~3 ~~ ~ la ~~ i~ I ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~Ww ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ n o n 0 0 N ~ Q ry n ~ ~, ~. m m _J ~ O O N W W Z Zo° I.iVKy ~-N d> <W{LW O O < K Q '~ '~' I e -~ ~ ~ ~vo~ ~A ~ ~ -1 ~ ~~ ~~ l~ ~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~~~~JA^OJ ~~~~ ~ o~v~ ~' ----~o-~ ~- W ~~ $g ' 'a y~ ~~y W W~O Pw O ~u~~ ~~ b V m 1 ~ ~ i I ry 't, ~ n n ~`' a ~ < r m N ~j 4i " O W Q ~ N X H o~ y 4 s ''•'a +~;~~'r~ {t/. y ~ :~T~y P O~ •,n.~.~wupi `+~il<~ \tyS ~~`. ~~~ ~~ s7~~jjj ~ ~~~ff~jj} .o ~WF ~ ir's7^$ ~~ ~.FEEEEEE~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~ . _~~~ ;~~~ ~ ; ~ ~~ I I~= ~ ~ ~ g~~~~ ~_ ~~ ~= s ~ ~~ ~~ ~ o ~o~ _ ~ i~ ^~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ I~~ ~ s !~ ~~ ``dye ~s ~ o~ ~~~ ~ ~ g~ ~~~ • r Iy Ni }Q3( < ~' O ~ R / -W Z ~ ~~ 3~ ~~ N ~~~`~^^~ ~v Obi ~Q rvnvrior~od o