HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/16/1985 - Regular Minutes - Zoning Board of AdjustmentsMINUTES
• CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
Zoning Board of Adjustment
July 16, 1985
7:00 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Upham, Members Wendt, Wagner,
Alternate Members Meyer & Swoboda
MEMBERS ABSENT: Members McGuirk & Fry
STAFF PRESENT: Zoning Official Kee & Planning Technician Volk
AGBNDA ITBM N0. 1: Call to order - explanation of functions and
limitations of Board.
Chairman Upham called the meeting to order and explained the functions and
limitations of the Board.
AGBNDA ITBM N0. 2: Hear visitors.
An unidentified gentleman in the audience (visitor register indicated it was W. R.
Bryant) stated that he is here to respond to a letter he had received from the City
regarding a variance on Peyton and Zoning Official Kee informed him that the
applicant had withdrawn the application so it has not been included on the agenda,
but notification from the applicant had come too late to re-notify the public.
• AGBNDA ITBM N0. 3: Approval of Minutes - =eeting of June 18,
1985.
Mr. Wagner made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Mr. Wendt seconded
the motion which carried unanimously (5-0).
AGBNDA ITBM N0. 4: Consideration of a variance to parking
requirements at 211 Oniversity Drive to a11oW additional seating
in existing restaurant. Applicant is Doubledave's Pizzaworks.
Mrs. Kee explained that the request has been revised from the original 8 spaces to
only 2 spaces; that there are currently 12 seats in this restaurant, and the
applicant is requesting to add 6 more seats. She further explained that when a use
for which required parking is determined by square footage is changed to a use for
which required parking is determined by the number of seats, staff makes the
calculations and advises the number of seats which will be allowed, further
advising that if any additional seats are desired, a variance will be required.
David Atkinson, 1104 Todd Trail was sworn in and identified himself as the
president of Doubledave's Pizzaworks and explained the variance request. He stated
that he was aware that 12 seats would be allowed in this restaurant at the time he
opened it, but has determined that an additional 6 seats would be better for
business. He said that he is approximately one block away from what is
normally considered the congested "Northgate" area, that his employees park behind
the restaurant but his customers cannot because there is no legal access to that
area. He added that verbal access has been granted by the owner of the land,
• George Boyett who has indicated that as long as that use is not abused, his
employees can use it.
1
ZBA Minutes 7-16-85
• He went on to explain that when he applied for the larger parking variance, he had
been anticipating leasing additional land from Bill Harper which he planned to use
for a patio, but added that he had not been able to reach an agreement with Mr.
Harper, and had therefore dropped his plans for a patio, and had revised his
variance request to cover 6 additional indoor seats.
Mr. Upham asked where his delivery vehicles park. Mr. Wendt asked what his peak
business hours are and what other businesses are close to this location. Mr.
Atkinson explained that his delivery vehicles park on the street and that there
might be a maximum of 3 cars at once parked there. He said that his peak hours are
from 6-7:30 p.m., and again from 10 p.m. to 12 a.m., pointing out that most of the
other businesses in this area are closed at 5 p.m., so his peak business hours are
after the other businesses are closed, therefore would not actually add to the
existing parking problems in the area. He continued explaining that the Deluxe
Burger is down the street, but has on-site parking so there is no conflict between
the two similar businesses.
Mr. Swoboda asked how on-street parking is assigned and Mrs. Kee replied that it is
not, as on-street parking is not technically counted by the City, therefore is not
controlled. Mr. Wendt asked if this is the same type of request this applicant
requested at his other place of business and Mr. Upham explained the difference is
that the other business is in a shopping center with a private parking lot, and
spaces are allocated to each business, thus making the other request much simpler
than this one where there is virtually no on-site parking available for any of the
businesses. Mr. Wagner asked if any attempt had been made to develop a cross-
• parking agreement with a business which had on-site parking available, but had peak
business hours which differed and Mr. Atkinson said that no one was willing to
enter into a formal agreement which might antagonize other businessmen in the area.
Mrs. Meyer stated that if a variance is granted, it goes with the land rather than
with the applicant, and that a variance might work very well for this particular
applicant, but if another business were established at this location which had
hours which were similar to other businesses in the area, a variance could very
well cause additional problems in an already troubled area. Mrs. Kee reminded the
Board that there had been at least one instance that the Board granted a variance
to a specific business only, with the stipulation that if another business was
established at that location, the variance became null and void. Mrs. Meyer then
asked why the applicant had changed his mind about the seating on the patio, and
Mr. Atkinson replied that several important factors had arisen which caused him to
change his mind about this addition to the business. He went on to state that he
(Doubledave's} has a 5 year lease on this land with an additional 5 year option to
renew, therefore he has a long-term plan for occupancy at this location.
Mr. Wagner then offered a motion to authorize a variance to the parking
requirements (Section 7) from the terms of this ordinance as it will not be
contrary to the public interest, due to the following unique and special conditions
of the land not normally found in like districts: (1)Business hours will be during
the time of day that current adjacent commercial businesses are closed; and,
(2)There are no other like districts in the city, and because a strict enforcement
of the provisions of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship to this
applicant and such that the spirit of this ordinance shall be observed and
• substantial justice done, subject to the following limitations: The variance is
2
ZBA Minutes
7-16-85
• granted to David Atkinson for the operation of Doubledave's Pizzaworks for the
duration of this business enterprise only. Motion was seconded by Mrs. Meyer and
passed by a unanimous vote (5-0).
AGENDA ITEM N0. 5: Other business.
Mr. Upham announced that it appears that Member James Fry no longer lives in the
community, and if that is true, he would request that a replacement member of the
Board be appointed by the Council.
He also referred to the Enabling Act which has been supplied by staff, and
requested that each Board member study it carefully.
He then expressed appreciation for the comments offered by the Legal Department on
the case file summary form.
AGENDA ITBM N0. 6: Adjourn.
Mr. Wagner made a motion to adjourn; Mr. Wendt seconded the motion which carried
unanimously (5-0) and the meeting was adjourned.
APPROVED
•
ATTEST
------------------------------
City Secretary, Dian Jones
C airm , Jack U ham
3
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
FORMAT FOR POSITIVE MOTION
Variances: From Section it-B.5
I move to authorize a variance to the
yard (6-G)
lot width (Table A)
lot depth (Table A)
sign regulations (Section $)
_ minimum setback (Table A)
parking requirements (Section 7)
from the terms of this ordinance as it will not be contrary to the public
interest, due to the following unique and spe 'al onditions of the land
not normally found in li e districts: ~,y~ ~
~^
/"
A
.~
~' Y
.~+ ~~-
and because a strict enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance
would result in unnecessary hardship to this applicant)
and such that the spirit of this Ordinance shall be observed
justice done, subject to the fol owin li itatlons:
1. ~ ~ .,~ C~ `
• ~.
J
This motion w ma y
Seconded by ~
The variance was granted he following vote:
~ubs
r Sig~Sature
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
GUEST REGISTER
• DATE July 16, 1985
NAME ADDRESS
nay, ~ ,r~
~/ l/ ~/.~ /7~! ~ t~'~>~ "fit/ ~ S~ ~~',~''~'' .;-~.
2 . ~/(/~ /~ ~ ~1Q, ~~ U ~ / x-22 / ~VL~ C'~ S .
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
l0.
11.
•
12.
13.
1#.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23-
. 24.
25.