HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/20/2024 - Regular Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission
College Station, TX
Meeting Agenda
Planning and Zoning Commission
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840
Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting
Meeting ID: 279 783 445 779 | Passcode: RtFGtJ
Phone: 833-240-7855 | Phone Conference ID: 291 547 031#
The City Council may or may not attend this meeting.
June 20, 2024 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, TX Page 1
Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location
stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by
videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a third-
party vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting
access and participation will be in-person only.
1. Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
2. Hear Visitors
At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues
not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The visitor presentations will be limited to three minutes in
order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time
for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look
into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the
meeting; please give your name and address for the record.)
3. Consent Agenda
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be
enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found
compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with
any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens
wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address
the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent
Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Attachments: 1. June 6 2024
4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
5. Regular Agenda
5.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a waiver request to the Unified
Development Ordinance Section 8.3.E.4.b ‘Adequate Street Access,’ and presentation,
discussion, and possible action regarding a Preliminary Plan for Greens Prairie Reserve
Page 1 of 79
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 2 June 20, 2024
Subdivision on approximately 233 acres of land, generally located southeast of Greens Prairie
Road and west of Arrington Road and the city limits. Case #PP2024-000004.
Sponsors: Jesse Dimeolo
Attachments: 1. Staff Report
2. Waiver request
3. Applicants Supporting Information
4. Vicinity Map and Aerial
5. Preliminary Plan
5.2. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map from Urban Residential to General
Commercial for approximately three acres, generally located at 116 and 120 Morgan’s Lane.
Case #CPA2023-000004 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 27, 2024
City Council Meeting - Subject to change.)
Sponsors: Jesse Dimeolo
Attachments: 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Maps
2. Background Information
3. Applicants Supporting Information
4. Comprehensive Plan Exhibit
5. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map
5.3. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official
Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from GS General Suburban to GC General Commercial and NAP
Natural Areas Protected on approximately six acres located in Lake View Acres, Lots 14-15
(Front 209’ of) and Lake View Acres Lot 15 (300’ of), generally located at 110, 116, and 120
Morgan’s Lane. Case #REZ2024-000006 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the
June 27, 2024 City Council Meeting – Subject to change).
Sponsors: Jesse Dimeolo
Attachments: 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Maps
2. Background Information
3. Applicants Supporting Information
4. Rezoning Exhibit
5. Future Land Use Map
6. Rezoning Map
5.4. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official
Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from R Rural to GS General Suburban and T Townhouse on
approximately seven acres located in the Needham Estates, Block 1, Lots 1-7 and in A005401,
R Stevenson (ICL), Tract 90, more generally located at 2542 and 2522 Barron Road. Case
#REZ2024-000008 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 27, 2024 City
Council Meeting – Subject to change).
Sponsors: Jesse Dimeolo
Attachments: 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Maps
2. Background Information
3. Applicants Supporting Information
4. Rezoning Exhibit
Page 2 of 79
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 3 June 20, 2024
5. Future Land Use Map
6. Rezoning Map
5.5. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundary from PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing with a
HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 2 acres being The Barracks II Phase 400 Block
36, Lot 27, generally located at the south corner of Tang Cake Drive and Old Wellborn Road.
Case # REZ2024-000015 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the July 11, 2024
City Council Meeting – Subject to change).
Sponsors: Jesse Dimeolo
Attachments: 1. Vicinity, Aerial and Small Area Maps
2. Background Information
3. Rezoning Exhibit
4. Applicants Supporting Information
5. Existing Future Land Use Map
6. Rezoning Map
6. Informational Agenda
6.1. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
6.2. Presentation and discussion regarding a joint meeting with the City of Bryan Planning & Zoning
Commission.
Sponsors: Molly Hitchcock
Attachments: None
6.3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on potential amendments to the Unified
Development Ordinance regarding Planned Development Districts.
Sponsors: Jeff Howell
Attachments: None
6.4. Presentation and discussion on MH Middle Housing rezoning requests.
Sponsors: Anthony Armstrong
Attachments: None
6.5. Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
• Thursday, June 27, 2024 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00
p.m.
• Thursday, July 11, 2024 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00
p.m.
• Thursday, July 18, 2024 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, July 25, 2024 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00
p.m.
• Thursday, August 1, 2024 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
6.6. Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor
Board.
Page 3 of 79
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 4 June 20, 2024
• None
7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
8. Adjourn.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed
on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on June 14, 2024 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting
and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD
at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the
meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification
at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to
provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly
Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire
libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411,
Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad
portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 4 of 79
June 6, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 5
Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting June 6, 2024
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson Melissa McIlhaney, Commissioners Jason
Cornelius, Bobby Mirza, Marcus Chaloupka, Aron Collins, Scott Shafer, and Warren Finch
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmember Dennis Maloney CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Planning & Development Services Anthony Armstrong,
Assistant Director of Planning & Development Services Molly Hitchcock, City Engineer Carol
Cotter, Assistant City Engineer Erika Bridges, Transportation Planning Coordinator Jason Schubert, Long Range Planning Administrator Christine Leal, Principal Planner Heather Wade, Staff Planners Jesse DiMeolo and Ashley Klein, Graduate Engineer II Lindsey Pressler, Deputy City Attorney Leslie Whitten, Administrative Support Specialist Kristen Hejny, and Technology
Services Specialist Trey Bransom
1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
Chairperson McIlhaney called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
3. Consent Agenda 3.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
• May 2, 2024
Commissioner Cornelius motioned to approve the Consent Agenda, Commissioner Shafer seconded the motion, the motion passed 7-0. 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. 5. Regular Agenda 5.1 Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding waiver requests to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.4.C.3 ‘Street Projections’ and 8.4.C.8 ‘Geometric
Standards, Street Design Criteria’ and possible action regarding a Preliminary Plan for
Woodland Park Subdivision on approximately 22 acres, generally located west of the
Page 5 of 79
June 6, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5
Dymple Lane and I&GN Road intersection in the City’s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Case #PP2024-000001
Staff Planner DiMeolo presented the waiver requests and preliminary plan to the Commission recommending approval of both. Commissioner Collins asked about the new road that will dead end, asking if sanitation and
emergency vehicles will be able to turn around.
Staff Planner DiMeolo clarified that there will be a turnaround at the end of Woodland Park Drive.
Commissioner Mirza asked how much green space will be dedicated.
Staff Planner DiMeolo clarified that there will be two common areas. Applicant, Jeff Robertson, McClure and Browne, was available to address the Commission
via TEAMS.
Commissioner Warren asked if the pond is existing. Mr. Robertson confirmed that the pond is existing.
Commissioner Collins asked for confirmation that this is the same waiver granted to the Millstone Estates development. Staff Planner DiMeolo confirmed that this is the same waiver granted to Millstone Estates.
Commissioner Shafer asked for the reasoning that streets in the City’s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) are 100 feet in width. Staff Planner DiMeolo clarified that 100 feet in width is typical for rural cross-sections in
the ETJ, as streets are not a standard curb and gutter design.
Commissioner Shafer asked why rural streets are not the standard 77 feet in width. Director Armstrong clarified that street width is a blanket statement among all
thoroughfares. The 100-foot width for rural streets is common to meet needs and
capacity for growth. Commissioner Collins motioned to recommend approval of the waiver requests and preliminary plan as presented, Commissioner Cornelius seconded the motion, the
motion passed 7-0. The Commission recessed the meeting at 6:13 p.m.
Page 6 of 79
June 6, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5
The Commission resumed the meeting at 6:24 p.m.
6. Informational Agenda
6.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
6.2 Presentation and discussion on MH Middle Housing rezoning requests.
Director Armstrong presented an update on MH Middle Housing zoning requests.
Commissioner Cornelius asked if the City will be sending an additional mail-out for shared- housing enforcement.
Director Armstrong stated that after the adoption of phase one of the MH Middle Housing rezoning, the City sent notices to those properties rezoned, outlining the process to come
into compliance. The City’s Code Enforcement Department will be responsible for
sending enforcement notifications to affected properties.
Commissioner Collins asked if there were any opportunities for amnesty.
Director Armstrong stated that the judge would be responsible for granting options on enforcement, also stating that code enforcement processes will take some time.
6.3 Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard:
• A rezoning of approximately 21 acres of land located in the Cat Hollow Phase 1 Subdivision and the Glenhaven Phase 8 Subdivision to establish a Restricted Occupancy Overlay. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on April 18, 2024 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard
this item on May 13, 2024 and voted (6-1) to approve the request.
• A rezoning of approximately 16 acres of land located at 3370 Rock Prairie Road West from R Rural to T Townhouse. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on April 18, 2024 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City
Council heard this item on May 13, 2024 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• A rezoning of approximately 19 acres of land generally located at Rock Prairie Road and Calveras Court from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on April 18, 2024 and
voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on May
13, 2024 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• A comprehensive plan amendment for approximately 3.25 acres of land generally located west of the intersection of Nantucket Drive and State
Highway 6 South from Suburban Residential and Natural and Open Areas to
Page 7 of 79
June 6, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 5
Neighborhood Commercial and Natural and Open Areas. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 2, 2024 and voted 7-0 to
recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on May 23, 2024 and
voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• A rezoning for approximately 3.25 acres of land generally located west of the intersection of Nantucket Drive and State Highway 6 South from R Rural to
PDD Planned Development District. The Planning & Zoning Commission
heard this item on May 2, 2024 and voted 7-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on May 23, 2024 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• A rezoning for approximately 2.017 acres of land located at 3109 Corsair Drive from M-1 Light Industrial to SC Suburban Commercial. The Planning &
Zoning Commission heard this item on May 2, 2024 and voted 7-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on May 23, 2024 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
There was no discussion.
6.4 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
• Thursday, June 13, 2024 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, June 20, 2024 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, June 27, 2024 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, July 18, 2024 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
There was no discussion.
6.5 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and
BioCorridor Board.
• None
There was no discussion.
7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may
be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda
for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion.
Page 8 of 79
June 6, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 5
8. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 6:33 p.m.
Approved: Attest: ___________________________________ _________________________________
Melissa McIlhaney, Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Board Secretary
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Page 9 of 79
Planning & Zoning Commission
June 20, 2024
Preliminary Plan
for
Greens Prairie Reserve
PP2024-000004
Scale 643 single-family residential lots, cluster development (20
phases) on approximately 233 acres
Location Generally located southeast of Greens Prairie Road and
west of Arrington Road and the city limits.
Applicant RME Consulting Engineers
Project Manager Jesse DiMeolo, Staff Planner
Project Overview This is an amendment to the original Preliminary Plan
adopted by the Planning and Zoning Commission on May
17, 2018. The original plan covered a total of 29 phases
and had subdivision regulation waivers to street
projections, adequate street access, cul-de-sac lengths,
block lengths, access ways, sidewalks, and parkland
dedication. This new, updated plan covers the remaining
20 phases that have not been built yet and has a higher
density that matches a recently approved PDD concept
plan from January of this year. This proposed preliminary
plan will consist of 643 lots with approximately 61 acres of
open spaces and 7.65 acres of parkland. A private trail is
proposed throughout the development that will connect
to the multi-use path along Diamondback Drive (minor
collector). The purpose of this amendment is to modify the
waiver to street access and require a secondary,
permanent access to the subdivision be built with phase
602.
Parkland Dedication At the May 8, 2018 Parks & Recreation Advisory Board
meeting, the Board recommended approval for the
dedication of 15.56 acres of neighborhood and community
parkland. As mentioned above, 7.65 acres of parkland
remains to be dedicated as the subdivision builds out. The
Board recommended approval that the parkland be
dedicated in phases.
Traffic Impact Analysis TIA was required with the original rezoning of the
property in 2017. With a more recent PDD rezoning last
year and an increase in density, the TIA remains valid. The
site’s assumed trip generation and traffic mitigation
recommendations outlined in the TIA are being fulfilled as
buildout continues.
Page 10 of 79
Planning & Zoning Commission
June 20, 2024
Compliant with Comprehensive Plan
(including Master Plans) and Unified
Development Ordinance
Yes.
Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, with the exception of one waiver being requested for
the following section of the subdivision regulations:
Section 8.3.E.4.b ‘Adequate Street Access’
Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending approval of the waiver. If the
waiver is approved, the plan must be approved. If the
waiver is denied, the plan must be denied as it would
not be in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations of
the UDO.
Supporting Materials
1.Waiver Request
2.Applicant’s Supporting Information
3.Vicinity Map & Aerial
4.Preliminary Plan
Page 11 of 79
SUBDIVISION WAIVER REQUEST
The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations
contained in the UDO except for the following waiver request:
UDO Section 8.3.E.4.b Adequate Street Access – When there are more than thirty (30) lots
to be served by external street connections, a minimum of two (2) street connections to
external paved public streets shall be required. The Planning and Zoning Commission may
allow remote emergency access where development phasing or constraints of the land
prevent the provision of a second street connection. Notwithstanding the foregoing, two (2)
street connections to externally paved public streets shall be required when one hundred
(100) or more lots are served.
This UDO section requires a minimum of two street connections to external public streets
when 100 or more lots are served. Currently, the subdivision has platted 247 lots. With the
proposed preliminary plan, the applicant is requesting the following sequencing of when the
second, paved access would be built.
Section 8, Phase 801 contains the portion of Diamondback Drive that connects into Greens
Prairie Road, across from Castlegate Drive. This phase, with its associated parkland
dedication, will be required when whichever of the following three items comes first:
A. Parkland dedication is required to meet or exceed requirements.
B. When the total subdivision lot count exceeds 428 lots.
C. Construction completion of fire station #7 located on Greens Prairie Road West and
near the NW corner of the subject tract.
Along with what is stated above, the applicant is proposing with the approval of this
preliminary plan that the next two phases to be built would be phases 601 and 602. Phase
602 would establish a permanent, paved connection with Greens Prairie Road.
In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver, the Planning and
Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver (Staff findings
are in italics).
1)That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved
such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the
applicant of the reasonable use of his land;
There are special circumstances affecting the land where strict application of the
regulations may limit the reasonable use of the land. The subject tract has over 3,000
feet of frontage to Greens Prairie Road West though the applicant has chosen to begin
building the subdivision from Arrington Road. This decision was due in part to the city
capital project to widen Greens Prairie Road West, which was just recently finished.
Looking at the context of the surrounding area, the only possible location for a second
connection is west towards Greens Prairie Road. Adjacent property to the north is farther
away, thus not a great option for access and the Windham tract to the south has no
Page 12 of 79
public roads to tie into, leaving the only option to build west either extending
Diamondback Drive or Coral River Road through section 6.
2)That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant;
This waiver seeks to delay the construction of a second public street access until phase
602 is built. After working closely with the applicant, city staff supports this proposal as it
encourages the development to connect to Greens Prairie Road sooner rather than later.
This waiver is necessary for substantial property rights of the developer as they are able
to continue platting lots as they extend roads towards the secondary connection. It is
necessary for the development as a whole when taking into consideration the timing of
connections to Greens Prairie Road.
3)The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in
administering this chapter; and
The granting of the waiver to delay the second public street access will not have a
greater impact on public health, safety, and welfare than the originally approved waiver
in 2018. Emergency access roads are provided to section 6, section 4, and all other
existing lots in section 2. The traffic impact analysis provided with the original rezoning
shows the anticipated traffic Level of Service that would result due to the increase in
number of lots flowing towards Arrington Road. The applicant states the Level of Service
remains acceptable from now until when the second permanent connection is made.
4)That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this
chapter.
The granting of the waiver does not prevent the orderly subdivision of other land in the
area as the second access via a public street is to an existing roadway.
If the Commission approves the waiver, the Commission shall incorporate the findings of
the waiver into the official minutes of the meetings at which such waiver is granted. If the
waiver is denied, then the preliminary plan is also denied. For this preliminary plan to be
approved as proposed, the waiver needs to be accepted. Waivers may be granted only
when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this UDO so that public health,
safety, and welfare may be secured and substantial justice done.
Staff is recommending approval of the waiver request.
Page 13 of 79
GREENS PRAIRIE RESERVE
Waiver Request – Preliminary Plan
Page - 1
WAIVERS TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application
of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
Due to unique development conditions, desired master planning of the subdivision, and the projected
construction time of Fire Station #7 the following waiver is being requested.
The Preliminary Plan illustrates three (3) proposed street connections. The first street connection has
been made along Arrington Road and the remaining two (2), located in subsequent phases, are off of
Greens Prairie Road. Currently a Remote Emergency Access serves this development and connects to
Greens Prairie Road. This temporary access is also illustrated on the Preliminary Plan.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the
applicant.
Currently the subdivision is serviced by Fire Station #5. Taking into consideration the additional milage
that would be required to drive down Greens Prairie Road and then Diamondback Drive, to the currently
developed portion of the subdivision, it is actually more efficient at this time to continue to utilize
Arrington Road and the fire/emergency access point.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious
to the other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
Per the original TIA, the Diamondback Drive/Arrington Road intersection will not have a failing Level of
Service (LOS) until a lot count of 700 is met.
An on-site meeting was conducted with Mr. Cameron Giordano (CoCS Fire Marshal) to review the existing
development conditions (access off of Arrington Road, emergency access roadway, and residential
construction). It is our understanding that the waiver request is acceptable with Mr. Giordano.
Current projections indicate that the portion of the subdivision that would benefit from the entry of
Diamondback Drive to Greens Prairie Road, would not be occupied until mid-to-late 2026. This coincides
with the expected timeframe that Fire Station #7 would come on-line.
Additional study and discussions were conducted with CoCS Staff. The result was that the Phase 601 &
602 boundary lines were adjusted so that a second permanent street connection to Greens Prairie Road
with the construction of Phase 602.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land
in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinances.
The waivers requested should not have a negative or disruptive influence on the normal operations and
development of this subdivision or adjacent property.
WAIVER REQUEST:
Section 12-8.3.E.4.b – Adequate Street Access: When there are more than thirty (30) lots to be served
by external street connections, a minimum of two (2) street connections to external paved public
streets shall be required. The Commission may allow a Remote Emergency Access where development
phasing or constraints of the land prevent the provision of a second street connection. Notwithstanding
Page 14 of 79
GREENS PRAIRIE RESERVE
Waiver Request – Preliminary Plan
Page - 2
the foregoing, two (2) street connections to external paved public streets shall be required when one
hundred (100) or more lots are served.
Waiver Request:
The second connection, to Greens Prairie Road, will be made with the completion of Phase 602.
A third street connection, to Greens Prairie Road, be provided at such time that the development (1)
exceeds a lot count of 428 dwelling units, (2) additional parkland dedication is required, or (3) Fire Station
#7 is constructed and in service (whichever comes first).
Page 15 of 79
Page 16 of 79
Page 17 of 79
INDEX OF SHEETS:
Page 18 of 79
6"SS6"SS6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
8"SS
8"SS
8"SS
8"SS
8"SS
8"SS 8"SS6"SS6"SS6"SS6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
8"SS8"SS8"SS8"SS8"SS8"SS6"SS6"SS 6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS 6"SS 6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
Page 19 of 79
8"SS
8"SS
8"SS
8"SS
8"SS
10"SS
10"SS
6"SS 8"SS8"SS8"SS6"SS
6"SS
8"SS8"SS
8"SS
6 "S S
6 "S S
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS 6"SS
6"SS
6"SS10"SS
10"SS
10"SS
1 0"S S 10"S S 10 "S S 10"SS6"SS6"SS6"SSPage 20 of 79
1 0"SS
1 0"SS
6"SS
10"SS
10"SS10"SS10"SS10"SS10"SSPage 21 of 79
6"SS6"SS6"SS6"SS 6"SS 6"SS
6
"
S
S6"SS 6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS 6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS 6"SS
6"SS
6"SS6"SS6"SS6"SS6"SS6"SS6"SS 6"SS6"SS6"SS6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
Page 22 of 79
10"SS
10"SS
10"SS
10"SS
8"SS8"SS8"SS6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
8"SS
8"SS
8"SS
8"SS6"SS6"SS
6"SS
6"SS 10"SS1 0 "S S
Page 23 of 79
Page 24 of 79
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS6"SS6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS6"SS6"SS6"SS6"SS6"SSPage 25 of 79
Page 26 of 79
Page 27 of 79
Page 28 of 79
Page 29 of 79
Page 30 of 79
Page 31 of 79
Page 32 of 79
Page 33 of 79
Page 34 of 79
June 20, 2024
Item No. 5.2.
Morgan's Lane CPA
Sponsor: Jesse Dimeolo
Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map from Urban
Residential to General Commercial for approximately three acres, generally located at 116 and 120
Morgan’s Lane. Case #CPA2023-000004 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the
June 27, 2024 City Council Meeting - Subject to change.)
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
Diverse & Growing Economy
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and
Character Map amendment
Summary: The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
and Character Map from Urban Residential to General Commercial for approximately three acres
located east of Morgan’s Lane. The subject property and properties immediately adjacent to the north
are primarily designated as Urban Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and
Character Map, while the properties to the south and west are General Commercial. This
Comprehensive Plan Amendment is in preparation for a rezoning of the property to allow for
additional commercial options in the area. It is the applicant’s intent to develop offices and self-
storage on the subject property.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Changed or changing conditions in the subject area of the City:
The subject property and properties immediately adjacent to the north are designated as Urban
Residential. The Urban Residential land use designation is generally for areas that are appropriate
for a range of high-density multifamily and attached residential development in various forms
including townhomes, apartment buildings, mixed-use buildings, and limited non-residential uses that
are compatible with the surrounding area.
The properties to the south and west are designated as General Commercial. These properties
General Commercial areas are concentrated areas of commercial activities that cater to both nearby
residents and to the larger community or region. Generally, these areas tend to be large and located
along regionally significant roads. Due to their context, these areas tend to prioritize automobile
mobility. This request to change the land use designation of the subject property to General
Commercial would allow for the development of a largely undeveloped property with close proximity
to Texas Avenue South and Harvey Mitchell Parkway.
2. Compatibility with the existing uses, development patterns, and character of the
immediate area concerned, the general area, and the City as a whole:
The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use & Character Map to General
Commercial and has also requested a rezoning to General Commercial. The intent of General
Page 35 of 79
Commercial is to accommodate a wide range of commercial uses and concentrate commercial
development near major intersections and thoroughfares. The subject property is located at the end
of Morgan’s Lane, about 500 feet northeast of Texas Avenue. This area continues to experience a
high amount of infill development as owners look to develop the remainder of the land between
Texas Avenue and the Bee Creek Tributary to the east. This property would be compatible with
existing uses, development patterns, and character of General Commercial zoned properties in the
area.
The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on March 19, 2024. All property owners within 200 feet of
the subject property were notified of the neighborhood meeting, and approximately four people were
in attendance. Attendees expressed no concerns regarding the land use change and only had
general inquiries about the project. The proposal is compatible with the character of the area as it
allows for commercial development that is compatible with the surrounding area.
3. Impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas:
A small portion in the eastern corner of the subject property is designated as FEMA floodplain. The
applicant is proposing to rezone the portion to NAP Natural Areas Protected to protect the potential
flood area from building development.
4. Impacts on infrastructure including water, wastewater, drainage, and the transportation
network:
Water and wastewater services will be provided by the City of College Station. There is adequate
water and sanitary sewer capacity to support the proposed amendment. The subject property is in
the Bee Creek Drainage Basin and drains to Bee Creek Tributary A. Drainage and any other
infrastructure required with the site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance
with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines.
The subject property has frontage to Morgan’s Lane, which is a local street. A Traffic Impact Analysis
(TIA) was provided with the rezoning request and more information can be found in the rezoning staff
report. The rezoning TIA determined that until the Dartmouth Street connection from Texas Avenue
to Harvey Mitchell Parkway is built, the development will be limited at the site plan stage to 85% of
the trips assumed to be generated by the GC General Commercial zoning district on the basis of
adequate infrastructure, but the infrastructure is otherwise adequate to serve the land use change.
5. Consistency with the goals and strategies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan:
The intent of College Station’s Comprehensive Plan is to create distinctive places, vibrant districts,
attractive neighborhoods, revitalized gateways and corridors, and conserved natural areas. The
proposed amendment to General Commercial, defined as areas that accommodate a wide range of
commercial uses, is appropriate for this property as it provides infill development along a major
commercial corridor of the city.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Maps
2. Background Information
3. Applicants Supporting Information
4. Comprehensive Plan Exhibit
5. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map
Page 36 of 79
Page 37 of 79
Page 38 of 79
Page 39 of 79
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: May 16, 2024
Advertised Council Hearing Date: June 13, 2024
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
None
Property owner notices mailed: 7
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts: None
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Urban Residential MF Multi-Family City Heights Multi-
Family Apartments
South General Commercial O Office Offices
East General Commercial
Natural & Open Areas
GC General
Commercial Undeveloped
West General Commercial GC General
Commercial
Wyndham Garden
Hotel
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1969
Zoning: R-1 Single Family Residential upon annexation
R-1 renamed GS General Suburban
Final Plat: Lake View Acres (1945)
Site development: Existing single-family structure
Page 40 of 79
Page 1 of 2
COMP PLAN APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
MORGANS LANE (CPA2023-000004)Name of Project:
116 AND 120 MORGANS LNAddress:
Legal Description:LAKE VIEW ACRES, LOT 15 (FRONT 209' OF)
Total Acreage:2.841
Applicant:MITCHELL & MORGAN
Property Owner:MORGANS SCOB LLC
What element of the Comprehensive Plan and at what location is requested to be amended?
Comprehensive Plan Amendment at 116 and 120 Morgans Lane
What is the amendment requested?
We request to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for this property from Urban Residential to General
Commercial.
What is the reason for the amendment?
We are seeking to amend College Station's Comprehensive Plan and rezone a portion of the property from
Urban Residential to General Commercial to accommodate the growing demand for commercial services and
foster economic development in the area. This change aligns with the city's vision for balanced urban growth
and aims to provide a diverse range of businesses and services for residents and visitors alike.
How will this change be compatible with the existing uses, development patterns, and character of the
immediate area concerned, the general area, and the city as a whole?
In response to the growing demand for commercial development in the area, numerous properties are
undergoing transformation into commercial spaces. The decision to pursue commercial development for this
specific property is influenced by its location, just off of Texas Avenue and the future extension of Dartmouth
Drive, which is highly suitable and compatible for such land use.
Page 41 of 79
Page 2 of 2
Explain the impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas and infrastructure, including water,
wastewater, drainage and transportation network.
We recognize that a portion of this property is in an environmentally sensitive area, and we will accommodate
for this area in the design of our plans and in future rezoning requests.
The infrastructure in the area, water, wastewater, electrical, drainage, and thoroughfares have been designed in
anticipation of this area being developed as high-density residential uses. This general commercial use has a
lower utility demand than high density residential. Dartmouth Drive is a thoroughfare that is planned to
accommodate the traffic loads from commercial traffic at this location.
Explain how this change will be consistent with the goals and strategies set forth in the Comprehensive
Plan.
The proposed amendment to College Station's Comprehensive Land Use Plan seeks to align the zoning of a
particular property with its surrounding context. Given that the adjacent properties are already designated as
General Commercial, it is appropriate to amend the land use plan on this property to commercial as well. This
approach ensures consistency and compatibility with the existing commercial zone and maintains a cohesive
and distinct commercial area without integrating residential elements into it.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
College Station’s Comprehensive Plan states that their goal is “to serve as an example of a vibrant, forward-
thinking, knowledge-based community that promotes the highest quality of life”. One of the strategies for
accomplishing this goal is to preserve the existing development pattern, while allowing opportunities for
development and growth to accommodate the increasing number of people moving to the community. Allowing a
commercial development at this location is contextually appropriate to the surrounding developments and will
provide a much-needed supply for commercial development and retail. This development is consistent with the
goals and strategies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan.
List any other additional properties.
N/A
Page 42 of 79
TEXAS
AVE. S
BROTHERS
BLVD
SITE
HARVEY
MITCHELL
PKY. S
DARTMOUTH
ST.
STATE
HWY-6 S
MORGAN LANE
T
E
X
A
S
A
V
E
S
BROTHERS BLVD1
2
3
5
4
D
A
R
T
M
O
U
T
H
S
T
.
LAKE VIEW ACRES, PORTIONS
OF LOTS 14-15, Acres: 0.58
Current Land Use:
Urban Residential LAKE VIEW ACRES, PORTIONS
OF LOTS 14-15, Acres: 2.26
Current Land Use:
Urban Residential,
Natural & Open Areas
MORGAN LANE
T
E
X
A
S
A
V
E
S
BROTHERS BLVD1
2
4
D
A
R
T
M
O
U
T
H
S
T
.
LAKE VIEW ACRES, PORTIONS
OF LOTS 14-15, Acres: 0.58
Proposed Land Use:
General Commercial LAKE VIEW ACRES, PORTIONS
OF LOTS 14-15, Acres: 2.26
Proposed Land Use:
General Commercial, Natural
& Open Areas
3
5
EXISTING PROPOSED
LEGEND
NATURAL &
OPEN AREAS
1" = 750'
Scale:
1 inch = 100 feet
VICINITY MAP
NOTES:
1.In accordance with FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map,
panel 48041C0310F, the site lies within the 100-year
floodplain boundary, Effective Date : 4/2/2014
GENERAL
COMMERCIAL
URBAN
RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED 2-LANE
MAJOR COLLECTOR
EXISTING 2-LANE
LOCAL STREET
EXISTING 4-LANE
MAJOR ARTERIAL
\\192.168.0.2\projects\22Proj\22092-Robert Young-Morgans lane property\22092 - CPA.dwg, Layout1, 10/25/2023 2:56:06 PMPage 43 of 79
June 20, 2024
Item No. 5.3.
Morgan's Lane Rezoning
Sponsor: Jesse Dimeolo
Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,”
Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from GS General Suburban to GC General Commercial and
NAP Natural Areas Protected on approximately six acres located in Lake View Acres, Lots 14-15
(Front 209’ of) and Lake View Acres Lot 15 (300’ of), generally located at 110, 116, and 120
Morgan’s Lane. Case #REZ2024-000006 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the
June 27, 2024 City Council Meeting – Subject to change).
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
Diverse & Growing Economy
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
Summary: This request is to rezone approximately six acres of land located on Morgan’s Lane, north
of Texas Avenue South, from GS General Suburban to GC General Commercial and NAP Natural
Areas Protected. This zoning request is in effort to provide more retail sales and services
opportunities to the area to serve the growing population of College Station. The Morgan’s Lane
rezoning is in conjunction with a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
from Urban Residential to General Commercial for the subject property which will need to be
approved first.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject tract is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as
Urban Residential and Natural and Open Areas. Urban Residential areas are appropriate for a range
of high-density multifamily and attached residential development in various forms including
townhomes, apartment buildings, mixed use buildings, and limited non-residential uses that are
compatible with the surrounding area. Natural and Open Areas are generally areas that represent a
constraint to development and that should be conserved for their natural function or open space
qualities. These areas include floodplains, riparian buffers, common areas, and open space.
The applicant has submitted an amendment request for a land use change from the Urban
Residential portion of the property to General Commercial. The proposed General Commercial land
use designation is appropriate for concentrated areas of commercial activities that cater to both
nearby residents and to the larger community or region. Generally, these areas tend to be large and
located along regionally significant roads. Due to their context, these areas tend to prioritize
automobile mobility. The proposed rezoning request to GC General Commercial is consistent with
the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezoning request to NAP Natural Areas
Protected is consistent with Comprehensive Plan, existing and proposed.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the
context of the surrounding area:
Page 45 of 79
The subject property is currently bordered by properties zoned GC General Commercial that have
frontage on Texas Avenue. To the north is a MF Multi-Family zoned apartment complex and an
undeveloped property with three different zoning designations: R Rural, GS General Suburban, and
PDD Planned Development District. Future plans for this property are limited to a list of restricted
office-related uses in the PDD ordinance, the future Dartmouth Street extension over a large portion
of the R Rural zoned area, and floodplain. As there is significant floodplain in the area that affects the
subject tract and tracts to the north and east, NAP Natural Areas Protected is an appropriate zoning
district that helps conserve the natural functions of the floodplain.
To the south is a small pocket of O Office-zoned property between larger amounts of GC General
Commercial. The subject property is bordered to the north by Morgan’s Lane, a small local street that
currently dead ends. On the southeast border there is a future thoroughfare projection of Dartmouth
Street that will project up north towards the existing, improved Dartmouth right-of-way, which starts at
the secondary entrance of the multifamily development. Commercial development in this area is
appropriate for the high classification of the roads in the area and the surrounding transition to
commercial and higher density residential developments. Amending the zoning to GC General
Commercial and NAP Natural Areas Protected is consistent with the anticipated land uses for this
area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning
district:
The size and location of the majority of the subject property is suitable for commercial uses. The site
has adequate space to meet the minimal dimensional standards for GC General Commercial. The
subject property has frontage and takes access from Morgan’s Lane. Additionally, the adjacent
property to the south includes the future extension of Dartmouth Street that will eventually connect
Texas Avenue to Harvey Mitchell Parkway. The proposed rezoning to GC General Commercial is
suitable for more intense land uses. The eastern corner of the subject property located in the FEMA
flood hazard area will be rezoned to NAP Natural Areas Protected and no commercial development
will occur there.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
Domestic water and fire flow for this tract will be provided by the City of College Station. Wastewater
service for this tract will also be provided by the City. There is adequate water and sanitary sewer
capacity to support the proposed rezoning request. The subject property is in the Bee Creek
Drainage Basin and drains to Bee Creek Tributary A. Drainage and any other infrastructure required
with the site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified
Design Guidelines.
The subject property has frontage to Morgan’s Lane, which is a local street. A Traffic Impact Analysis
(TIA) was provided with the rezoning request. The Dartmouth Street proposed thoroughfare is
immediately adjacent to the subject property and runs along the southeastern border. Dartmouth
Street is proposed to be a two-lane major collector. The TIA determined that until the Dartmouth
Street connection from Texas Avenue to Harvey Mitchell Parkway is built, the development will be
limited to 85% of the trips assumed to be generated by the GC General Commercial zoning district
on the basis of adequate infrastructure. At the site planning stage, the development will also be
required to construct a right turn deceleration lane at the northbound Texas Avenue approach to the
Morgan’s Lane intersection, regardless of if the Dartmouth Street connection is built or not.
Page 46 of 79
5. The marketability of the property:
The applicant has stated that single-family uses are not marketable at this location. Single-family
residential zoning was placed on the property as a placeholder following annexation in 1969. Since
that time, the surrounding area has developed with higher intensity commercial, office and multi-
family uses. Rezoning to allow commercial uses is anticipated to increase the marketability of the
property.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Maps
2. Background Information
3. Applicants Supporting Information
4. Rezoning Exhibit
5. Future Land Use Map
6. Rezoning Map
Page 47 of 79
Page 48 of 79
Page 49 of 79
Page 50 of 79
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: May 16, 2024
Advertised Council Hearing Date: June 13, 2024
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
None
Property owner notices mailed: 18
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts: None
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Urban Residential MF Multi-Family City Heights Multi-
Family Apartments
South General Commercial O Office Offices
East General Commercial
Natural & Open Areas
GC General
Commercial Undeveloped
West General Commercial GC General
Commercial
Wyndham Garden
Hotel
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1969
Zoning: R-1 Single Family Residential upon annexation
R-1 renamed GS General Suburban
Final Plat: Lake View Acres (1945)
Site development: Existing single-family structure
Page 51 of 79
Page 1 of 2
REZONING APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
MORGANS LANE REZONING (REZ2024-000006)Name of Project:
110, 116 AND 120 MORGANS LNAddress:
Legal Description:LAKE VIEW ACRES, LOT 15 (300' OF) & PORTION OF LOT 14
Total Acreage:5.96 acres
Applicant:MITCHELL & MORGAN
Property Owner:MORGANS SCOB LLC
List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change
necessary.
Several new developments in this area of College Station have been a catalyst for continued new developments
and redevelopments. As College Station continues to grow, retail sales and services become more necessary to
serve the growing population. Infill properties are very valuable as they do not contribute to urban sprawl and
necessary infrastructure is widely available. However, commercial uses are not permitted under the existing GS
General Suburban zoning district; therefore, a rezoning to GC General Commercial and NAP Natural Areas
Protected to protect environmentally sensitive areas, is necessary.
Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
explain why the Plan is incorrect.
The Comprehensive Plan designates these properties as General Commercial and Urban land uses. We’ve
requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Urban to General Commercial to bring all properties to the
same land use designation. If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved, this rezoning request will be in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby
property and with the character of the neighborhood?
Because most of the property in the immediate area is zoned and developed for commercial and high-density
multi-family uses, the current zoning for GS General Suburban is an island on the zoning map. Single-family
zoning at this location is no longer appropriate and would be undesirable. GS General Suburban is not suitable
for this property.
Page 52 of 79
Page 2 of 2
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
Much of the property in the vicinity has been recently developed or redeveloped with general commercial multi-
family uses. The request to rezone the property to GC General Commercial and NAP Natural Areas Protected,
to protect the floodplain on the property, is suitable for this property. This infill development is a priority stated in
the Comprehensive Plan making this development and rezoning request even more suitable for this property.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
Much of the property in the vicinity has been recently developed or redeveloped with general commercial multi-
family uses. The request to rezone the property to GC General Commercial and NAP Natural Areas Protected,
to protect the floodplain on the property, is suitable for this property. This infill development is a priority stated in
the Comprehensive Plan making this development and rezoning request even more suitable for this property.
Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
Single-family uses are not marketable at this location. Single-family residential zoning was placed on the
property as a placeholder following annexation in 1969. Since that time, the surrounding area has developed
with higher intensity commercial, office and multi-family uses. Single-family uses are no longer appropriate for
this property, nor marketable.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
N/A
Page 53 of 79
SITE
HARVEY
MITCHELL
PKY. S
DARTMOUTH
ST.
STATE
HWY-6 STEXAS
AVE. S
BROTHERS
BLVD
BROTHERS BLVD
1
2
3
5
MORGAN LANEHARVEY MITCHELL PKY S
T
E
X
A
S
A
V
E
S
D
A
R
T
M
O
U
T
H
S
T
.BROTHERS BLVD4
6 LAKE VIEW ACRES, PORTION
OF LOTS 14-15
Acres: 5.96
Existing Zoning:
GS GENERAL SUBURBAN
OWNER: MORGANS SCOB LLC
BROTHERS BLVD
2
3
MORGAN LANEHARVEY MITCHELL PKY SBROTHERS BLVDD
A
R
T
M
O
U
T
H
S
T
.
T
E
X
A
S
A
V
E
S
1
5
4
6 LAKE VIEW ACRES,
PORTION OF LOTS 14-15
Acres: 5.641
Proposed Zoning:
GC GENERAL COMMERCIAL
OWNER: MORGAN SCOB LLC
LAKE VIEW ACRES,
PORTION OF LOTS
14-15
Acres: 0.319
Proposed Zoning:
NAP NATURAL AREAS
PROTECTED
OWNER: MORGAN
SCOB LLC
EXISTING PROPOSED
LEGEND
GS GENERAL
SUBURBAN
1" = 750'
Scale:
1 inch = 150 feet
VICINITY MAP
NOTES:
1.In accordance with FEMA'S FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
panel 48041C0310F, the site lies within the 100-year
floodplain boundary, Effective Date : 4/2/2014
GC GENERAL
COMMERCIAL
NAP NATURAL
AREAS PROTECTED
O OFFICE
PROPOSED 2-LANE
MAJOR COLLECTOR
EXISTING 2-LANE
LOCAL STREET
PDD PLANNED
DEVP. DISTRICT
R RURALMF MULTI
FAMILY
EXISTING 4-LANE
MAJOR ARTERIAL
EXISTING 2-LANE
MINOR COLLECTOR
R-6 HIGH DENSITY
MULTI-FAMILY
Scale:
1 inch = 150 feet
Page 54 of 79
June 20, 2024
Item No. 5.4.
Leyla Heights Rezoning
Sponsor: Jesse Dimeolo
Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 "Zoning Districts,”
Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to GS General Suburban and T Townhouse on
approximately seven acres located in the Needham Estates, Block 1, Lots 1-7 and in A005401, R
Stevenson (ICL), Tract 90, more generally located at 2542 and 2522 Barron Road. Case #REZ2024-
000008 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 27, 2024 City Council Meeting –
Subject to change).
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
Neighborhood Integrity
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request
Summary: This request is to rezone approximately seven acres of land located on Barron Road,
across from the College Station High School, from R Rural to GS General Suburban and T
Townhouse. The tract was originally zoned R Rural upon annexation into the City in 1995. Prior to
annexation, the easternmost portion of this property was platted into one block and seven lots of the
Needham Estates Subdivision. Public right-of-way was also dedicated for the extension of Jamey
Lane from Leyla Lane to Barron Road. The proposed GS portion of the rezoning request is in an
effort to continue the same style of single-family development along Crestmont Drive up until the
point where Leyla Lane will bend southeast to continue towards Barron Road. The remainder of the
tract of land is being proposed as T Townhouse to help utilize a denser single-family product closer
to the school and main thoroughfare of Barron Road.
Rezoning Review Criteria
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject tract is
designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Suburban
Residential. These areas are primarily single-family residential areas that consist of low to moderate
density single-family lots. This may also include limited townhomes, duplexes, other housing types,
and some non-residential uses that are compatible with surrounding single-family areas.
Development types tend to be highly consistent within a subdivision or neighborhood. The rezoning
request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and promotes a mixture of single-family housing
types that are appropriate for the area.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the
context of the surrounding area: The existing R Rural zoning allows for a mix of large acreages
and large-lot residential developments, which is incompatible with the development in this area.
Given the property’s proximity to Barron Road and the College Station High School, a rezoning to
denser single family housing types will help promote growth as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan.
GS General Suburban developments permit a maximum of 8 dwelling units per acre whereas T
Townhouse has a permitted maximum of up to 14 dwelling units per acre. Since townhomes can
Page 57 of 79
have 3-12 attached single-family units, more homes can be built on the subject tract. Increased
density near the school will create improved accessibility to the school by walking, bicycling and other
alternative modes of transportation.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning
district: The size and location of the subject property is suitable for residential uses. The site has
adequate space to meet the minimal dimensional standards for both GS General Suburban and T
Townhouse districts. Each lot will require public street frontage on any of the proposed local streets
that will connect through the property. There is no floodplain on the property.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The
existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of this development.
Detention is required in accordance with the BCS guidelines. Drainage and any other infrastructure
required with the site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS
Unified Design Guidelines.
The subject property has frontage to Barron Road and right-of-way dedicated for Jamey Lane. Barron
Road is classified as a 4-lane Minor Arterial on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. Jamey Lane is a local
street. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required for the rezoning request as the applicant
showed the anticipated trip generation to be less than the threshold of 150 trips in the peak hour. At
this time, infrastructure is adequate for the uses permitted by the proposed GS General Suburban
and T Townhouse zoning districts.
5. The marketability of the property: The applicant has stated that the current R Rural zoning is not
the highest and best use for the property. Rezoning the property from R Rural to GS General
Suburban and T Townhouse can provide additional development opportunity by allowing more
density on the property. This opportunity for additional lots and density should increase the
marketability of the property.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Maps
2. Background Information
3. Applicants Supporting Information
4. Rezoning Exhibit
5. Future Land Use Map
6. Rezoning Map
Page 58 of 79
Page 59 of 79
Page 60 of 79
Page 61 of 79
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: May 16, 2024
Advertised Council Hearing Date: June 13, 2024
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Edelweiss Gartens HOA, Edelweiss Ridge HOA, Sonoma HOA
Property owner notices mailed: 49
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition: Two against development in the area
Inquiry contacts: One
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Suburban Residential GS General Suburban Single Family
Residential
South Institutional/Public R Rural College Station High
School
East Suburban Residential R Rural Single Family
Residential
West Suburban Residential GS General Suburban
Single Family
Residential and a
school/daycare
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1995
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation
A-O renamed R Rural (2013)
Final Plat: Portion platted as Needham Estates, Block 1, Lots 1-7
Site development: Undeveloped
Page 62 of 79
Name of Project:REZONE 2542 AND 2522 BARRON ROAD TO GS AND TH (REZ2024-000008)
Address:2542 BARRON RD
Legal Description:A005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 90, 4.89 ACRES
Total Acreage:7.07
Applicant::
Property Owner:SAVAGE GRACE LYNN REVOCABLE TR
BEAMON ENGINEERING, LLC
List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change
necessary.
This is infill development surrounded by GS and College Station High School. The proposed use is consistent
with the surrounding development.
Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
explain why the Plan is incorrect.
The Comprehensive Plan designation is Suburban Residential which allows for single family homes and
townhomes in a limited setting, which is perfect for this infill.
How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby
property and with the character of the neighborhood?
The current property is zoned rural which is not adequate for the highest and best use of this property.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
The requested zoning is well suited for the proposed use since proposed use exactly matches the zoning being
requested.
REZONING APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Page 1 of 2
Page 63 of 79
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
The requested zoning is well suited for the proposed use since proposed use exactly matches the zoning being
requested.
Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
The property currently has one single family house with possible agricultural uses. For this location, the property
is not marketable under the current use.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
NA
Page 2 of 2
Page 64 of 79
DFOUND1/2" IRONROD (CM)FOUND1/2"
IRON ROD (CM
)FROM WHICH A
5
/8"
IRON RODBEARS: S03° 02' 41"W,
0
.28
'FOUND5/8" IRON ROD
(CM)FOUND1/2"
IRONRODFOUND1/2" IRONRODFOUND1/2" IRONROD P.O.B.FOUND1/2" IRON ROD (CM)N:10,190,097.63'E:3,568,297.17'FOUND1/2" IRONROD (CM)FOUND1/2" IRONRODFOUND1/2" IRONROD
FOUND1/2" IRONROD (CM)FOUND1/2"
IRONRODFOUND5/8
" IRON RODFOUND5/8" IRON
RODFOUND5/8"
IRON RODFOUND5/8" IRON RODFOUND5/8"
IRON RODFOUND1/2" IRON ROD (CM)FOUND1/2" IRON
ROD
(CM)FOUND5/8"
IRON RODFOUND5/8" IRON
RODFOUND5/8" IRON
RODFOUND5/8"
IRON RODFOUND5/8" IRON RODFOUND5/8" IRONROD FOUND1/2"
IRONRODFOUND5/8"
IRON RODSET "SPIKE"C.P. #5ELEV: 333.47SET "X" IN
CONCN:10,190,090.81'E:3,569,151.97'C.P. #6ELEV: 325.56SET "X" IN CONCN:10,189,658.96'E:3,568,754.57'B
A
R
R
O
N
R
O
A
D
(9
0
'
R
-
O
-
W
)
CRESTMONT DRIVE(50' R-O-W)HOFBURG DRIVE(60' R-O-W) LEYLA LANE(50' R-O-W)S4
2
°
3
8
'
4
1
"W
,
3
4
7
.
5
4
'N48° 10' 05"W, 629.78'S47° 59' 50"E, 616.27'(PLAT CALL: 629.83')LOT 11LOT 10LOT 9LOT 8LOT 7LOT20LOT 19LOT 18BARRON CREST SUBDIVISIONVOL. 13019, PG. 194, BCOPREXISTING ZONING: GS-GENERAL SUBURBANE D
E
L
WE
IS
S
R
ID
G
E
V
OL
.
1
0
0
6
5
,
P
G
. 2
44
,
B
C
O
P
REX
I
S
T
I
N
G
Z
O
N
IN
G
:
G
S-G
E
NE
R
A
L
S
U
B
U
R
B
A
NLOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5BLOCK 1,NEEDHAM ESTATESVOL. 276, PG. 301, BCOPREXISTING ZONING: R-RURAL JAMEY LANE(60' R-O-W)BLOCK 2,NEEDHAM ESTATESVOL. 276, PG. 301, BCOPREXISTING ZONING: GS-GENERAL SUBURBANN42°
3
3
'
3
1
"
E
,
1
4
8
.
6
2
'
N42°
3
2
'
2
4
"
E
,
1
4
8
.
6
3
'
N42°
3
0
'
3
3
"
E
,
1
4
8
.
6
4
'
N42°
2
8
'
0
9
"
E
,
1
4
8
.
6
5
'Δ=89°23'12"R=25.16
'L=39.26'CH=S03°05'29"E
, 35
.40
'
S4
2
°
2
5
'
5
3
"
W
,
1
2
3
.
6
9
'
N41
°
2
3
'
3
7
"
E
,
1
4
8
.
6
8
'
N42
°
2
8
'
2
8
"
E
,
1
4
8
.
6
6
'BLO C K 1EXISTING ZONING: GS-GENERAL SUBURBANBLOCK 2EXISTING ZONING: GS-GENERAL S
UB
U
R
BA
N
B
LOCK
1
JAMEY LANE(60' R-O-W)N4
4
°
5
1
'
1
4
"
E
,
4
9
8
.
6
1
'10' UTILITY EASEMENTVOL. 276, PG. 301, BCDR15' BUILDING LINEVOL. 276, PG. 301, BCDR10' PUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENTVOL. 9343, PG. 176, BCOPR10' PUBLICUTILITYEASEMENTVOL. 8780, PG.84, BCOPR20' UTILITY EASEMENTVOL. 321, PG. 571, BCDR0.20' NE0.08
' NE0.08' NE0.23' NE0.17' NE558 SQ FT R-O-W
DEDICAT
IONVOL. 8289, PG. 62, BCOPRFOUND5/8"
IRONRODFOUND5/8" IRONRODFOUND5/8" IRONROD FOUND5/8" IRONRODPUBLIC ACCESSEASEMENTVOL. 12912, PG. 235, BCDR20' PUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENTVOL. 12062, PG. 99, BCDR10' PUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENTVOL. 13019, PG. 194, BCDR10' PUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENTVOL. 12062, PG. 99, BCDREUGENE BERNARD SAVAGE III, ET ALTO GRACE LYNN SAVAGE, TRUSTEE,VOL. 16669, PG. 95, BCOPREXISTING ZONING: R-RURALDRAWN BY:APPROVED BY:DATE:SHEET NO.:JOB NUMBER:SCALE:DPBDPB1 OF 1TBD1"=100'REZONING EXHIBIT
LEYLA HEIGHTS
COLLEGE STATION, TXTHIS EXHIBIT HAS BEENPREPARED BY DANIEL BEAMON,P.E. #105876. THIS EXHIBITSHALL BE USED FOR REFERENCEONLY AND SHALL NOT BE USEDFOR BIDDING OR CONSTRUCTION.APRIL 22, 2024BEAMON
ENGINEERINGB LEGENDPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSED GENERALSUBURBAN ZONINGPROPOSED TOWNHOMEZONINGVICINITY MAP 1" = 2000'PROJECTLOCATIONBARRON RD VICTORIA AVEWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYRENEE LNJAMEY LNHOFFBURG DRWELLBORN RD GRAHAM RDEAGLE AVELEYLA LN
PROPOSED TOWNHOMEZONING (5.96 ACRES)PROPOSED GENERALSUBURBAN ZONING(1.12 ACRES)Page 65 of 79
June 20, 2024
Item No. 5.5.
Tang Cake Rezoning
Sponsor: Jesse Dimeolo
Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,”
Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundary from PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing
with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 2 acres being The Barracks II Phase 400
Block 36, Lot 27, generally located at the south corner of Tang Cake Drive and Old Wellborn Road.
Case # REZ2024-000015 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the July 11, 2024 City
Council Meeting – Subject to change).
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
Neighborhood Integrity
Recommendation(s): Approval
Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 2.01 acres of land being one platted lot located at
101 Tang Cake Drive from PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing with a HOO
High Occupancy Overlay. The subject property was platted in 2016 and is currently undeveloped.
The property was originally zoned as a part of the Barracks PDD and according to the concept plan,
listed as a commercial area. Up until this time, commercial has struggled to develop in this area due
to its separation from nearby commercial corridors like Deacon Drive and Rock Prairie Road West.
The lack of frontage on these streets lends it to being appropriate property for residential uses.
Nearby properties to the northwest, west and southwest include townhomes that are a part of the
Barracks Subdivision. The undeveloped property to the east, at the corner of Old Wellborn and Rock
Prairie Road, has a future land use of General Commercial, which is more appropriate as it has direct
frontage to a four-lane major arterial.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject property is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map as
Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the
following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including townhomes,
duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3-12 units), and limited small-lot single family. These areas
are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows the original character to evolve.
These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi-family residential or mixed-use
development and suburban residential or neighborhood conservation areas.
The Mixed Residential land use intends to accommodate a walkable pattern of small lots, small
blocks, and well-connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods. Developments in
this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near community facilities or
adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The zoning districts that are generally appropriate
Page 68 of 79
within this land use include middle housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited-scale single-family
zoning. Rezoning to MH Middle Housing and HOO Occupancy Overlay is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan as it provides a variety of housing options and a good transition from the
existing residential area of the Barracks to more intense urban developments along Rock Prairie
Road and Wellborn Road.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the
context of the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded townhomes to the northwest, west, and southwest, and
undeveloped commercial land to the east. Development pressure continues to grow as new
generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station. Allowing
and encouraging infill development opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market.
The Middle Housing zoning district enables the development of this lot at an appropriate scale,
enabling the increase in residential density to this site. The residential and shared housing uses
permitted in the MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay zoning districts are
appropriate in the context of the surrounding areas.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The location of the subject property makes it suitable for single-family houses, townhouses,
duplexes, and multiplex uses, although due to the unique shape of the lot not being a rectangle with
equal sides, some uses may not exactly fit lengthwise when taking into consideration right of way
needed for an internal street. At the replatting stage, the applicant will determine the use and housing
type after fully examining the dedication of the right-of-way and how it may change the lot
dimensions.
4. Whether there are available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure are adequate to support the needs of this
development. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site development shall be
designed and constructed following the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject property fronts
Old Wellborn Road and Tang Cake Drive. The lot is able to take access from either road although it
may be preferred to utilize Tang Cake Drive as it is newer and in better condition. The proposed use
is expected to generate less than 150 trips in any peak hour; therefore, a TIA was not required.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by the proposed zoning district are generally marketable for the area. The
applicant states that as this tract does not have access to attract nor sustain a commercial
development, it is not marketable with the current zoning.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Vicinity, Aerial and Small Area Maps
2. Background Information
3. Rezoning Exhibit
4. Applicants Supporting Information
Page 69 of 79
5. Existing Future Land Use Map
6. Rezoning Map
Page 70 of 79
Page 71 of 79
Page 72 of 79
Page 73 of 79
BACKGROUND INFORMATION – REZ2024-000015
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 20, 2024
Advertised Council Hearing Date: July 11, 2024
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
The Barracks Townhomes HOA
Property owner notices mailed: 46
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Major Arterial R Rural FM 2154 Wellborn Rd ROW
(Old Wellborn Rd)
South Mixed Residential PDD Planned Development
District Townhomes
East General Commercial R Rural Undeveloped
West Mixed Residential PDD Planned Development
District Townhomes
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexed: 2002
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (2002 upon annexation)
PDD Planned Development District (2011)
PDD Planned Development District (2012)
PDD Planned Development District (2013)
PDD Planned Development District (2014)
PDD Planned Development District (2015)
Final Plat:Barracks II Phase 400
Site Development:Undeveloped
Page 74 of 79
THE BARRACKS II PH 400,BLOCK 36, LOT 27ACRES: 2.01Existing Zoning: PDDPLANNED DEVELOPMENTDISTRICTLand Use: MIXEDRESIDENTIAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14TANG CAKE DRIVEWAKEWELL CTPUBLIC ALLYGENERAL PKWYWELLBORN ROAD20' P.U.E.(13225/186)20' P.U.E.(13225/186)10' P.U.E.(13225/186)20' P.U.E.(13225/186)OLD WELLBORN ROAD5' P.A.E.(13225/186)THE BARRACKS II PH 400,BLOCK 36, LOT 27ACRES: 2.01Proposed Zoning: MHMIDDLE HOUSING ANDHOO HIGH OCCUPANCYOVERLAY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14T
A
N
G
C
A
K
E
D
R
I
V
EWAKEWELL CTPUBLIC ALLYGENERAL PKWYWELLBORN ROAD20' P.U.E.(13225/186)20' P.U.E.(13225/186)10' P.U.E.(13225/186)20' P.U.E.(13225/186)OLD WELLBORN ROAD5' P.A.E.(13225/186)WELLBORN ROADSITEOLD WELLBORN ROADTANG CAKE DRIVEEXISTINGPROPOSED LEGEND VICINITY MAPRZS:\23Proj\23067-Barracks tract rezoning\23067-Rezoning Map.dwg, RZ, 5/16/2024 10:40:48 AM
Page 75 of 79
Page 1 of 2
REZONING APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
TANG CAKE DRIVE REZONING (REZ2024-000015)Name of Project:
101 Tang Cake Drive Address:
Legal Description:THE BARRACKS II PH 400, BLOCK 36, LOT 27
Total Acreage:2.01
Applicant:MITCHELL & MORGAN
Property Owner:YASMEEN NUZHAT & MIAN RIAZ
List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change
necessary.
The City of College Station recently created a use for medium density residential uses, or shared housing, that
is permitted under the MH Middle Housing zoning district. The City has also created an overlay district called
HOO High Occupancy Overlay which is intended to “accommodate increased residential occupancy through
permitting of shared housing as a use.”
This lot has remained undeveloped as a commercial property for almost 10 years due to poor access, which
cannot be improved due to the fully developed housing surrounding this property and proximity to the railroad.
As housing continues to be in demand, this property is better suited to serve as medium density housing.
Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
explain why the Plan is incorrect.
The Comprehensive Plan indicates this property is designated for Mixed Residential. Mixed Residential is
“appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including townhomes, duplexes, small multi-
family buildings… These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows original
character to evolve.” There is a variety of housing densities and products in in this area of the city that the
existing shared housing duplexes contributes toward, which is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby
property and with the character of the neighborhood?
Most of the properties in the vicinity include medium density housing intended for student housing such as
townhomes within the Barracks subdivision and various residential products zoned MH Middle Housing both with
and without a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. The requested rezoning to MH Middle Housing with a HOO High
Occupancy Overlay is compatible with the developing character of the neighborhood which supports medium
density residential uses.
Page 76 of 79
Page 2 of 2
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
Middle housing uses, including shared housing, contribute to the desired mix of densities desired in the MH
Middle Housing zoning district and Mixed Residential land use designation making this development very
suitable for the property.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
Commercial uses are not suitable for this property as businesses depend on convenient vehicular access and
sufficient traffic counts to support commercial development. This tract has poor access from Old Wellborn Road
and Tang Cake Drive, which do not carry enough traffic to support any commercial uses at this location.
Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
According to the PDD for the Barracks development, this tract is designated for commercial uses. This tract
does not have access to attract nor sustain a commercial development. It is not marketable with the current
zoning.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
N/A
Page 77 of 79