Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/26/2023 - Regular Agenda Packet - City Council College Station, TX Meeting Agenda City Council 1101 Texas Ave, College Station, TX 77840 *Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting Meeting ID: 223 427 023 174 | Passcode: MvPmTr Phone: 469-480-7460 | Phone Conference: 952 310 468# October 26, 2023 4:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers College Station, TX Page 1 Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a third- party vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting access and participation will be in-person only. 1. Call to Order. 2. Executive Session Agenda. Executive Session is closed to the public and will be held in the 1938 Executive Conference Room. The City Council may according to the Texas Open Meetings Act adjourn the Open Meeting during the Consent, Workshop or Regular Agendas and return into Executive Session to seek legal advice from the City Attorney regarding any item on the Workshop, Consent or Regular Agendas under Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. 2.1. Consultation with Attorney {Gov’t Code Section 551.071}; Possible action. The City Council may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending or contemplated litigation subject or settlement offer or attorney-client privileged information. Litigation is an ongoing process and questions may arise as to a litigation tactic or settlement offer, which needs to be discussed with the City Council. Upon occasion the City Council may need information from its attorney as to the status of a pending or contemplated litigation subject or settlement offer or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. The following subject(s) may be discussed: a. Kathryn A. Stever-Harper as Executrix for the Estate of John Wesley Harper v. City of College Station and Judy Meeks; No. 15,977-PC in the County Court No. 1, Brazos County, Texas. b. McCrory Investments II, LLC d/b/a Southwest Stor Mor v. City of College Station; Cause No. 17-000914-CV-361; In the 361st District Court, Brazos County, Texas. c. Shana Elliott and Lawrence Kalke v. City of College Station, et al., Cause No. 22-001122-CV- 85, in the 85th District Court, Brazos County, Texas. d. City of College Station v. 47 Oaks, LLC, Cause No. 626-CC, in the County Court at Law No. 2 of Brazos County, Texas. e. SOAH Docket No. 473-22-2464 and PUC Docket No. 52728 – Application of the City of College Station to Change Rates for Wholesale Transmission Services. f. Cynthia Hopkins & Geoffry Hopkins v. City of College Station, Cause No. 23-002880-CV-85 in the 85th District Court, Brazos County, Texas. g. Legal advice regarding the rezoning of property. 2.2. Real Estate {Gov't Code Section 551.072}; Possible action. The City Council may deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real Page 1 of 344 City Council Page 2 October 26, 2023 property if deliberation in an open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the City in negotiations with a third person. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. The following subject(s) may be discussed: a. Approximately 28 acres of land generally located at Midtown Drive and Corporate Pkwy in the Midtown Business Park. b. Property generally located west of Texas State Highway 6 and in between Harvey Road and Holleman Drive. c. Property generally located in the area of FM 60, Boyett Street, Church Ave. and College Main Street. 2.3. Personnel {Gov’t Code Section 551.074}; Possible action. The City Council may deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. The following public officer(s) may be discussed: a. City Manager b. Council Self-Evaluation 3. The Open Meeting will Reconvene No Earlier than 6:00 PM from Executive Session and City Council will take action, if any. 4. Pledge of Allegiance, Invocation, and Consider Absence Request. Speaker Protocol An individual who desires to address the City Council regarding any agenda item other than those items posted for Executive Session must register with the City Secretary two (2) hours before the meeting being called to order. Individuals shall register to speak or provide written comments at https://forms.cstx.gov/Forms/CSCouncil or provide a name and phone number by calling 979-764- 3500. Upon being called to speak an individual must state their name and city of residence, including the state of residence if the city is located out of state. Speakers are encouraged to identify their College Station neighborhood or geographic location. Please do not carry purses, briefcases, backpacks, liquids, foods or any other object other than papers or personal electronic communication devices to the lectern, nor advance past the lectern unless you are invited to do so. Comments should not personally attack other speakers, Council or staff. Each speaker’s remarks are limited to three (3) minutes. Any speaker addressing the Council using a translator may speak for six (6) minutes. The speaker’s microphone will mute when the allotted time expires and the speaker must leave the podium. 5. Presentation - Proclamations, Awards, and Recognitions. 5.1. Presentation proclaiming October 2023 as Arteriovenous Malformation Awareness Month. Sponsors: Tanya Smith Attachments: 1. 23 AVM Awareness Month 5.2. Presentation proclaiming November 6th-10th as Municipal Court Week. Sponsors: Tanya Smith Attachments: 1. 23 Muni Ct Week 6. Hear Visitors. During Hear Visitors an individual may address the City Council on any item which does not appear on the posted agenda. The City Council will listen and receive the information presented by the speaker, Page 2 of 344 City Council Page 3 October 26, 2023 ask staff to look into the matter, or place the issue on a future agenda. Topics of operational concern shall be directed to the City Manager. 7. Consent Agenda. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on consent items which consist of ministerial or "housekeeping" items as allowed by law. A Councilmember may request additional information at this time. Any Councilmember may remove an item from Consent for discussion or a separate vote. 7.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of minutes for: • October 12, 2023 Council Meeting Sponsors: Tanya Smith Attachments: 1. JTM101223 DRAFT Minutes 2. CCM101223 DRAFT Minutes 7.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a resolution authorizing an interlocal agreement for Gateway Monument Sign No. 3 with the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT). Sponsors: Jennifer Cain Attachments: 1. Gateway Sign #3 - Resolution & ILA-SH 47 College Station 2. Gateway Sign #3 - Project Map 7.3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a resolution authorizing the application for the Bureau of Reclamation Water Resources and Planning Office WaterSMART Drought Response Program for the Well 6 Capacity Rehabilitation project. Sponsors: Stephen Maldanado Attachments: 1. BOR WaterSMART Grant Resolution 7.4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a resolution authorizing a license agreement with Wolf Den BCS, LLC pertaining to the approximately 0.41 square foot building encroachment, into the 15-foot public utility easement located on Lot 5, Block 1 of the Wolf Den Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in volume 18520, page 28 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, more commonly known as 4138 Jeanne Drive. Sponsors: Anthony Armstrong Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Resolution Exhibit A - License Agreement 3. License Agreement Exhibit A 4. Vicinity Map 5. Location Map 6. Application 7.5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a contract renewal with the Reynolds Company, LLC for the annual purchase of Water SCADA infrastructure products and services for an amount not to exceed $216,000. Sponsors: Gary Mechler Attachments: 1. Renewal Four (4) of Contract #20300063 8. Workshop Agenda. 8.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on an update on Texas A&M Off-Campus Student Services Office operations. Sponsors: Barbara Moore Attachments: None Page 3 of 344 City Council Page 4 October 26, 2023 9. Regular Agenda. 9.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action related to the resolution creating a Texas Music Friendly Advisory Committee. Sponsors: Brian Piscacek Attachments: 1. Resolution Music Friendly Advisory Board 9.2. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on an ordinance vacating and abandoning a 0.058-acre portion of right-of-way, generally located between Lots 5, 6, & 7 of Block 1 of the Southeast College Park Subdivision, also known as 802 Dexter Drive South. Sponsors: Parker Mathews Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit A 3. Vicinity Map 4. Location Map 5. Application 9.3. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A , Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 2.799 acres located at 1115 Anderson Street, generally located at the intersection of Anderson Street and Clement Street, east of Holleman Drive. Sponsors: Gabriel Schrum Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3. Background Information 4. Applicant's Supporting Information 5. Rezoning Map 6. Existing Future Land Use Map 7. Concept Plan 9.4. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries as follows: a. From MH Middle Housing or R-4 Multi-Family to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay or R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 2.85 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 10-19, generally located along Cooner Street; b. From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 4.6 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 20-30, and Block 5, Lots 1-8, generally located along Cooner Street; c. From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 5.4 acres being College Vista, Block E, Lots 1-14, Block F, Lots 1-10, Block G, Lots 1-5, Block H, Lots 1-3, 4R-5R, and 6-7, generally located along Live Oak Street and Ash Street; d. From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 5.11 acres being University Oaks Phase 2, Block 5, Lots 1-13, Page 4 of 344 City Council Page 5 October 26, 2023 14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21-23, 24A1-24A2, and 25R, generally located along Dominik Drive; e. From MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 4.66 acres being Little-Knight Addition, Lots 1-18, generally located along Aurora Court, and; f. From GS General Suburban or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 23.62 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Joseph E. Scott League, Abstract No. 50, and Crawford Burnett League, Abstract No. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including all of the W.M. Sparks Subdivision as described by plat recorded in Volume 139, Page 261, and portions of West Park Addition and West Park 2nd Addition as described by plats recorded in Volume 102, Page 198 and Volume 128, Page 574, respectively, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, as well as subsequent replats of portions of these subdivisions in an area generally bounded by Luther Street, Montclair Avenue, Grove Street, and Maryem Street. Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Area B1, Area B2, and Area D Supporting Materials 3. Area F-G-H Supporting Materials 4. Area J Supporting Materials 5. Area Y Supporting Materials 6. Area 1 Map 7. Area 2 Map 8. Area 3 Map 9.5. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Section 6.3 “Types of Use” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, for modifications to the shared housing use in the MH Middle Housing zoning district. Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Section 6.3 Types of Use redlines 9.6. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries as follows: a. From GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 2.02 acres being Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lots 1-16 and 17R, generally located along Lincoln Avenue; b. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 4.12 acres being Timber Ridge Addition Phase 1, Block 2, Lots 13-24, Block 3, Lots 12-22, generally located along University Oaks Boulevard; c. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 6.71 acres being Parkway Plaza Phase 5, Block 1, Lots 1-15, Block 2, Lots 1-12, generally located along Pine Ridge Drive; d. From GS General Suburban or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 19.34 acres being Autumn Chase, Block 1, Lots 1- Page 5 of 344 City Council Page 6 October 26, 2023 7, Brentwood Section Two, Block 4, Lots 1-30, Block 5, Lots 1-23, Block 6, Lots 1-4, and Brentwood Section Three Subdivision, generally located along Cornell Drive, Brentwood Drive, and Southwest Parkway; e. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 5.8 acres being Ashford Square Subdivision Replat, Volume 3202, Page 61, generally located along Ashford Drive; f. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 8.15 acres being Pecan Tree Estates Phase One Subdivision and Pecan Tree Estates Phase Two Subdivision, save and except 0.687 acres labeled "Park," generally located along Oney Hervey Drive; g. From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 28.4 acres being University Heights Phase 1 Subdivision, save and except Common Area 4, and University Heights Phase 2 and 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Paloma Ridge Drive, Feather Run, Davidson Drive, and Holleman Drive South; h. From R Rural to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 8.8 acres being Las Palomas Subdivision, generally bounded by Abbate Road, Feather Run, Kenyon Drive, and Holleman Drive South; i. From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 12.85 acres being The Barracks II Phase 111 Subdivision, and The Barracks II Phase 112, Block 38, Lots 1-24, Block 39, Lots 1-10, Common Area 13 and Parkland 12, generally bounded by Towers Parkway, Goldilocks Lane, and Cain Road; j. From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 18.83 acres being Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 Subdivision, Volume 14370, Page 149, and Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 2A Subdivision, generally bounded by Deacon Drive West, Towers Parkway, Oak Crest, and Holleman Drive South, and; k. From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 55.49 acres being The Barracks Phase 1 Subdivision, The Barracks Phase 2 Subdivision, Williamsgate Phase 1 Subdivision, Buena Vida Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 1 Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 2 Subdivision, and 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Rock Prairie Road West, Towers Parkway, Deacon Drive West, and General Parkway. Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Area E Supporting Materials 3. Area I Supporting Materials 4. Area M Supporting Materials 5. Area P-Q-R-S-T Supporting Materials 6. Area W Supporting Materials 7. Area Z Supporting Materials 8. Area HH and Area II Supporting Materials 9. Area JJ-KK, Area LL, and Area MM Supporting Materials 10. Area 1 Map 11. Area 2 Map 12. Area 3 Map 13. Area 5 Map 9.7. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Page 6 of 344 City Council Page 7 October 26, 2023 Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries as follows: a. From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 15.5 acres being The Dobrovolny Subdivision and Holleman Ridge Subdivision, generally bounded by Anderson Street, Holleman Drive, and Charles Court; b. From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 9.73 acres being Lemon Tree Addition, Block 1, Lots 1-11, Block 2, Lot 1, Block 3, Lots 1- 11, and Parkway Plaza Phase 4, Block 3, Lots 1-14, Block 4, Lots 1-9, generally bounded by Anderson Street, Cedar Run, and Lemon Tree Lane; c. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 7.03 acres being Brentwood Section Five, Block 1, Lots 1-16 and Block 4, Lots 1-11, generally located along Colgate Circle and Stanford Circle; d. From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 6.85 acres being Eastmark Phase II, Block E, Lots 1R-5R and Lots 16-40, generally located along Kalanchoe Court, Camelia Court, and Azalea Court; e. From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 7.4 acres being Krenek Crossing Subdivision, Volume 6187, Page 138, generally located along Nelson Lane, Thornton Court, and Camp Court; f. From GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing for approximately 3.87 acres being Chalet Village Subdivision, Volume 420, Page 91, generally located along Swiss Court and Chalet Court; g. From R Rural or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 43.6 acres being Steeplechase Phase One Subdivision, Steeplechase Phase Two Subdivision, and Steeplechase Phase Three Subdivision, generally bounded by Navarro Drive, FM 2154, Balcones Drive, and Welsh Avenue; h. From GS General Suburban, R-1B Single Family Residential, or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 38.1 acres being Steeplechase Phase Five Subdivision, Steeplechase Phase Six Subdivision, Southwood Valley Section 23 Subdivision, Volume 525, Page 647, and West Ridge, Block 5, Lots 1A-1B, 2A-2B, 3A-3B, 4A-4B, 5A-5B, 6A- 6B, 7A-7B, 8A-8B, 9A-9B, 10A-10B, 11A-11B, 12A-12B, 13A-13B, 14A-14B, 15A-15B, 16A-16B, 17A-17B, 18A-18B, 19A-19B, 20A-20B, 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B, 24A-24B, and 25A-25B, generally bounded by Deacon Drive, FM 2154, Navarro Drive, and Welsh Avenue; and i. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 14.6 acres being Southwood Valley Section 22B, Block 47, Lots 1-14, Block 48, Lots 1-15 and 20-34, Block 49, Lots 14-29, and Southwood Valley Section 22C, Block 45, Lots 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B, 24A-24B, 25A-25B, 26A-26B, 27A-27B, 28A-28B, Block 47, Lots 25A-25B, 26A-26B, 27A- 27B, 28A-28B, 29A-29B, 30A-30B, 31A-31B, and 32A-32B, generally bounded by Deacon Drive, Welsh Avenue, Navarro Drive, and Pedernales Drive. Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Area L and Area N Supporting Materials 3. Area U Supporting Materials 4. Area V Supporting Materials 5. Area X Supporting Materials 6. Area BB Supporting Materials 7. Area DD, Area EE, and Area FF Supporting Materials Page 7 of 344 City Council Page 8 October 26, 2023 8. Area 2 Map 9. Area 3 Map 10. Area 4 Map 9.8. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, "Article 4, Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 0.23 acres generally located at 701-703 Turner Street. Sponsors: Robin Macias Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3. Rezoning Exhibit 4. Background Information 5. Applicant's Supporting Information 6. Existing Future Land Use 7. Rezoning Map 10. Council Calendar - Council May Discuss Upcoming Events. 11. Items of Community Interest. The Council may receive reports from a Council Member or City Staff about items of community interest for which notice has not been given, including: expressions of thanks, congratulations or condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; honorary or salutary recognitions of a public official, public employee, or other citizen; reminders of upcoming events organized or sponsored by the City of College Station; information about a social, ceremonial or community event organized or sponsored by an entity other than the City of College Station that is scheduled to be attended by a Council Member, another city official or staff of the City of College Station; and announcements involving an imminent threat to the public health and safety of people in the City of College Station that has arisen after the posting of the agenda. 12. Council Reports on Committees, Boards, and Commissions. A Council Member may make a report regarding meetings of City Council boards and commissions or meetings of boards and committees on which a Council Member serves as a representative that have met since the last council meeting. (Committees listed in Coversheet) 13. Future Agenda Items and Review of Standing List of Council Generated Future Agenda Items. A Council Member may make a request to City Council to place an item for which no notice has been given on a future agenda or may inquire about the status of an item on the standing list of council generated future agenda items. A Council Member’s or City Staff’s response to the request or inquiry will be limited to a statement of specific factual information related to the request or inquiry or the recitation of existing policy in response to the request or inquiry. Any deliberation of or decision about the subject of a request will be limited to a proposal to place the subject on the agenda for a subsequent meeting. 14. Adjourn. Page 8 of 344 City Council Page 9 October 26, 2023 The City council may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on October 20, 2023 at 5:00 p.m This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” City Secretary Page 9 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 5.1. 2023 as Arteriovenous Malformation Awareness Month Sponsor: Tanya Smith, City Secretary Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Presentation proclaiming October 2023 as Arteriovenous Malformation Awareness Month. Relationship to Strategic Goals: - Good Governance Recommendation(s): Recieve the Proclamation. Summary: The Aneurysm Foundation (TAF) was established by the Kaitz family in 2003 in honor of family members who lived with, or died from, brain aneurysms. The Kaitz family was astonished by the lack of public awareness and under-support of research of such a widespread and often fatal condition. Through TAF the family launched a crusade to educate and encourage awareness about brain aneurysms. In 2005 a group of medical professionals, survivors and caregivers briefly formed the Foundation for Brain Aneurysm and Vascular Malformations. The primary focus was to provide motivational and other educational resources to the patient and caregiver community, and to increase public awareness. With similar visions and complementary goals, these foundations merged to expand The Aneurysm Foundation into the present day foundation now known as ‘The Aneurysm and AVM Foundation’ (TAAF). Today TAAF focuses on public awareness, furthering research, and fostering a community of support for those affected by aneurysm and other types of vascular malformation of the brain. Budget & Financial Summary: None. Attachments: 1. 23 AVM Awareness Month Page 10 of 344 Proclamation WHEREAS: An arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is a complex tangle of arteries and veins that bypasses normal brain tissue and directly diverts blood from the arteries to the veins, potentially resulting in devastating ruptures, seizures, or death; and WHEREAS: An estimated 18 in 100,000 people in the United States have an AVM in the brain; and WHEREAS: After an AVM rupture there is a 10-15% risk of death and a 20-30% chance of permanent brain damage after each bleed; and WHEREAS: Approximately 10-58% of AVM patients have various kinds of aneurysms, a weak area in a blood vessel that enlarges like a balloon, and is at risk for bleeding or rupture resulting in possible brain damage or long-term disability; and WHEREAS: 50% of AVM patients present as sudden hemorrhage, bleeding in the brain, or a form of stroke; and WHEREAS: Access to accurate information, expertise, and community to support survivors, caregivers, families, and friends in making educated decisions about treatment and coping can make a critical difference in minimizing risks and increasing the quality of life for those affected. NOW, THEREFORE, I, John P. Nichols, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of College Station, Texas, do hereby proclaim October 2023 as AVM Awareness Month We encourage citizens to raise awareness of aneurysms and AVMs and support efforts to increase public awareness so individuals can recognize symptoms and understand available resources and options for those with these brain conditions. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the seal of the City of College Station, Texas, this 26th Day of October 2023. John P. Nichols Mayor Attest: Tanya Smith City Secretary Page 11 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 5.2. Proclaiming November 6th-10th as Municipal Court Week Sponsor: Tanya Smith, City Secretary Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Presentation proclaiming November 6th-10th as Municipal Court Week. Relationship to Strategic Goals: - Good Governance Recommendation(s): Receive the Proclamation. Summary: Join municipal courts, city councils, and communities throughout Texas in showing appreciation for the dedicated municipal judges, court clerks, court administrators, prosecutors, bailiffs, and warrant officers who comprise the Texas municipal courts from November 6-10, 2023. Municipal Court Week is a great time to not only recognize how much municipal courts do, but to share with the public the important role that local courts and their personnel play in the criminal justice system and the larger community. TMCEC encourages all cities to adopt the attached proclamation in recognition of Municipal Court Week. All cities that adopt the proclamation and notify TMCEC of its adoption will be recognized by TMCEC in a future edition of The Recorder. Budget & Financial Summary: None. Attachments: 1. 23 Muni Ct Week Page 12 of 344 Proclamation WHEREAS, the Municipal Court of College Station, a time honored and vital part of local government, has existed since January 8, 1952; and WHEREAS, more people, citizens and non-citizens alike, come in personal contact with municipal courts than all other Texas courts combined; and WHEREAS, public impression of the entire Texas judicial system is largely dependent upon the public’s experience in Municipal Court; and WHEREAS, Municipal Judges and court support personnel have pledged to be ever mindful of their neutrality and impartiality, rendering equal service to all, and conform to the standards set by the Canons of Judicial Conduct; and WHEREAS, the Municipal Courts play a significant role in preserving the quality of life in Texas communities through the adjudication of traffic offenses, ensuring a high level of traffic safety for our citizens; and WHEREAS, the Municipal Courts serve as the local justice center for the enforc ement of local ordinances and fine-only state offenses that protect the peace and dignity of our community and our state; and WHEREAS, the Municipal Judges and Clerks continually strive to improve the administration of justice through participation in judicial education programs, seminars, workshops and the annual meetings of their state and local professional organizations; and WHEREAS, it is most appropriate that we recognize the accomplishments of the 878 Texas Municipal Courts, and salute their critical role in preserving public safety, protecting the quality of life in Texas communities, and deterring future criminal behavior. NOW, THEREFORE, I, John P. Nichols, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of College Station, Texas, do hereby proclaim November 6-10, 2023 as Municipal Court Week and further extend our appreciation to College Station Municipal Judge Spillane and court support personnel for the vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to our community and call upon all residents of College Station to join with the City Council in recognizing the vital service they perform and their exemplary dedication to the communities they represent. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the seal of the City of College Station, Texas this 26th Day of October, 2023 John P. Nichols Mayor Attest: Tanya Smith City Secretary Page 13 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 7.1. Minutes Sponsor: Tanya Smith, City Secretary Reviewed By CBC: City Council Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action of minutes for: • October 12, 2023 Council Meeting Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance Recommendation(s): Recommends Approval. Summary: N/A Budget & Financial Summary: None Attachments: 1. JTM101223 DRAFT Minutes 2. CCM101223 DRAFT Minutes Page 14 of 344 JTM 101223 Minutes Page 1 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING WITH COLLEGE STATION ISD BOARD OF TRUSTEES CITY OF COLLEGE STATION OCTOBER 12, 2023 STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF BRAZOS § Present: John Nichols, Mayor Council: Mark Smith - absent William Wright Linda Harvell Elizabeth Cunha Bob Yancy Dennis Maloney ISD Board of Trustees Blaine Decker Joshua Benn Geralyn Nolan Jeff Horak Kimberly McAdams Darin Paine Thomas Hall - absent City Staff: Bryan Woods, City Manager Jeff Capps, Deputy City Manager Adam Falco, City Attorney Leslie Whitten, Deputy City Attorney Tanya Smith, City Secretary Ian Whittenton, Deputy City Secretary 1. Call to Order and Announce a Quorum is Present. With a quorum present, the meeting of the College Station City Council was called to order by Mayor Nichols via In-Person at 3:00 p.m. on October 12, 2023, in the Bush 4141 Community Room of the City of College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas 77840. 2. Joint Agenda Item 2.1 Presentation and discussion related to partnerships, agreements, infrastructure, building use and location, events, related ordinances and policies, and strategic planning between the City and the District. Mayor Nichols gave a brief overview of items of interest: Page 15 of 344 JTM 101223 Minutes Page 2 •Housing Action Plan Steering Committee – Overview of the Action of the Committee. •Grant with Twin City Mission for the Homeless and working with non-profits. •Contract for a feasibility study for a Recreation Center and 2 Phases. Council and CSISD discussed issues related to homelessness and how it is handled not just by the City but by the School District, and non-profits. Nutrition, non-profits working with families, education, and other programs are employed to address the issue. Council and CSISD discussed co-operative events and having CSISD use city facilities. CSISD asked about annexation, and it was stated that College Station cannot expand their annexation outside of CSISD. Council and CSISD to possibly write a joint statement opposing giving any tax dollars to private schools. Council and CSISD discussed the proposed school bonds before the voters this fall. The CSISD wanted to be clear that these bonds will not provide a new school but rather maintain and protect the infrastructure, assets, and enhance the staffing abilities of the school district. Council discussed with the CSISD their most pressing problems: retention and recruitment of staff, keeping current facilities in good repair, transportation logistics, and the bond package currently before voters. Council and CSISD discussed partnerships with local health and safety organizations and agencies to enhance the education provided to students. 3. Adjournment. There being no further business, Mayor Nichols adjourned the Meeting of the City Council at 4:07 p.m. on Thursday, October 12, 2023. ________________________ John P. Nichols, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Tanya Smith, City Secretary Page 16 of 344 CCM 101223 Minutes Page 1 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN-PERSON WITH TELECONFERENCE PARTICIPATION CITY OF COLLEGE STATION SEPTEMBER 28, 2023 STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF BRAZOS § Present: John Nichols, Mayor Council: Mark Smith – Absent William Wright Linda Harvell Elizabeth Cunha Bob Yancy Dennis Maloney City Staff: Bryan Woods, City Manager Jeff Capps, Deputy City Manager Adam Falco, City Attorney Leslie Whitten, Deputy City Attorney Tanya Smith, City Secretary Ian Whittenton, Deputy City Secretary 1. Call to Order and Announce a Quorum is Present. With a quorum present, the meeting of the College Station City Council was called to order by Mayor Nichols via In-Person and Teleconference at 4:15 p.m. on October 12, 2023, in the Council Chambers of the City of College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas 77840. 2. Executive Session Agenda. Councilmember Smith joined the executive session by remote. In accordance with the Texas Government Code §551.071-Consultation with Attorney, §551.072-Real Estate, and §551.074-Personnel, the College Station City Council convened into Executive Session at 4:15 p.m. on October 12, 2023, to continue discussing matters pertaining to: 2.1. Consultation with Attorney to seek advice regarding pending or contemplated litigation, to wit: •Kathryn A. Stever-Harper as Executrix for the Estate of John Wesley Harper v. City of College Station and Judy Meeks; No. 15,977-PC in the County Court No. 1, Brazos County, Texas; and •McCrory Investments II, LLC d/b/a Southwest Stor Mor v. City of College Station; Cause No. 17-000914-CV-361; In the 361st District Court, Brazos County, Texas; and Page 17 of 344 CCM 101223 Minutes Page 2 •Shana Elliott and Lawrence Kalke v. City of College Station, et al., Cause No. 22-001122-CV- 85, in the 85th District Court, Brazos County, Texas; and •City of College Station v. 47 Oaks, LLC, Cause No. 626-CC, in the County Court at Law No. 2 of Brazos County, Texas; and •SOAH Docket No. 473-22-2464 and PUC Docket No. 52728 – Application of the City of College Station to Change Rates for Wholesale Transmission Services; and •Legal advice for an ETJ release petition related to approximately 46.6 acres of land, generally located south of the intersection of Arrington Road and Harper’s Ferry Road; and •Legal advice related to the North East Trunk Line Project. 2.2. Deliberation on the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property; to wit: •Approximately 28 acres of land generally located at Midtown Drive and Corporate Pkwy in the Midtown Business Park. •Property generally located west of Texas State Highway 6 and in between Harvey Road and Holleman Drive. •Property generally located in the area of FM 60, Boyett Street, Church Ave. and College Main Street. 2.3. Deliberation on the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer; to wit: •City Manager •City Judge •City Secretary •City Auditor •City Attorney •Council Self-Evaluation Councilmember Smith left the executive session and did not rejoin the open meeting. 3. The Open Meeting Will Reconvene No Earlier than 6:00 PM from Executive Session and City Council will take action, if any. Executive Session recessed at 6:10 p.m. No action was taken. 4. Pledge of Allegiance, Invocation, consider absence request. MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Harvell and a second by Councilmember Yancy, the City Council voted six (6) for and none (0) opposed, to accept Councilmember Smith’s absence request for October 12, 2023. The motion carried unanimously. 5. PRESENTATION - PROCLAMATIONS, AWARDS, AND RECOGNITIONS. 5.1. Presentation proclaiming October 2023 as Community Planning Month. Mayor Nichols presented a proclamation marking October 2023 as “Community Planning Month” to Planning and Development Services director Michael Ostrowski and staff. 5.2. Presentation proclaiming the week of October 16th, 2023 as College Station History Week. Page 18 of 344 CCM 101223 Minutes Page 3 Mayor Nichols presented a proclamation to the Ross Brady and members of the Historic Preservation Committee and proclaimed October 16, 2023, as College Station History Week. 5.3. Presentation proclaiming October 2023 as Chiropractic Health Month. This proclamation was not presented as there was no one in attendance to receive it. 6. Hear Visitors Comments. Luke Morrison, College Station, came before Council to speak about housing crisis and zoning changes that affect the student body. Andrew Applewhite, College Station, came before Council to speak on behalf of 68,000 students in this community and request council address the housing crisis in College Station. Sam Langenbaum, College Station, came before Council to speak about the no more than four policies, he believes laws like this hinder a student’s chance at education. Rawley Schott, College Station, came before Council regarding the no more than four policies. He believes that if people would just come and talk to students or educated them instead of complaining many issues could be solved. Grayson Sims, College Station, came before Council to speak about the no more than four policy and state he does not believe students should have criminal penalties for violating it. Cade Coppinger, College Station, thanked the council for listening to so many opinions tonight and spoke about the good and bad experiences he has had as a student living in a historic neighborhood. Ben Crockett, College Station, came before Council to speak about housing affordability and how enforcement of the no more than four ordinance will make the housing problem worse. Corbitt Armstrong, College Station, came before Council to speak about his experience as a student and how strong the sense of community is in College Station. He believes that education and outreach will make better neighbors, not strict enforcement of the no more than four ordinance which will drive housing prices up. Marcus Glass, College Station, came before Council to speak about the no more than four and the housing crisis in College Station. He believes that creative solutions are needed, not strict enforcement. Will McIntosh, College Station, gave Council a history of his life and the impact on it from numerous concussions and the stress, which are made worse worrying about housing issues. Tre Watson, College Station, spoke on mandatory rental inspection and what he believes is the gentrification of older areas of the city. 7. CONSENT ITEMS Presentation, discussion, and possible action on consent items which consist of ministerial, or "housekeeping" items as allowed by law: A Councilmember may request additional information at this time. Any Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for a separate vote. Page 19 of 344 CCM 101223 Minutes Page 4 Items 7.6, and 7.10 were pulled from Consent for clarification. (7.6) Jeff Kersten, Assistant City Manager, explained that as part of the 2023-2024 budget process the City Council approved funding for the Brazos Valley Economic Development Corporation in the amount of $350,000. The funds for this agreement are budgeted and available in the 2023-2024 General Fund. The full amount of $350,000 is to be used for operations and maintenance. (7.10) Matthew Marek, Electric, explained that staff issued Bid 23-085 on July 17, 2023, for materials for Northwest Substation and the Bid was opened on August 16, 2023. Seven (7) sealed proposals were received and were reviewed by Electric Staff to ensure the compliance of needed specifications. KBS Electrical Distributors and Techline Inc. were recommended for award based upon delivery dates, meeting College Station Utility specifications, and pricing. The quotes from the other vendors provided alternatives that did not meet specifications or were considered invalid bid responses. 7.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of minutes for: •September 28, 2023, Council Meeting 7.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a funding agreement between the City of College Station and the Arts Council of the Brazos Valley for FY24 in the amount of $35,000. 7.3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a funding agreement between the City of College Station and the Arts Council of the Brazos Valley for FY24 in the amount of $560,953. 7.4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding Resolution No. 10-12-23-7.4 authorizing expenditure to the Aggieland Humane Society, Inc. in the amount of $276,000. 7.5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a funding agreement between the City of College Station and the Amber Alert Network Brazos Valley for FY24 in the amount of $5,000. 7.6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a funding agreement between the City of College Station and the Brazos Valley Economic Development Corporation for FY24 in the amount of $350,000. 7.7. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a funding agreement between the City of College Station and the Bryan/College Station Chamber of Commerce for FY24 in the amount of $25,000. 7.8. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a funding agreement between the City of College Station and the Memorial for All Veterans of the Brazos Valley for FY24 in the amount of $30,000. 7.9. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a funding agreement between the City of College Station and Keep Brazos Beautiful for FY24 in the amount of $48,230. 7.10. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on contracts for the purchase of long-lead materials for the Northwest Electric Substation from KBS Electrical Distributors not to exceed $364,855.22 and Techline Inc. not to exceed $154,500. Page 20 of 344 CCM 101223 Minutes Page 5 7.11. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Bryan for the Management of the Larry J. Ringer Library. 7.12. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on renewing a contract with DXI Industries, Inc for the annual purchase of sodium hypochlorite. The estimated annual expenditure for sodium hypochlorite is $330,770. 7.13. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on renewing a contract with DXI Industries, Inc. for the annual purchase of chlorine gas. The estimated annual expenditure for chlorine gas is $250,000. MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Harvell and a second by Councilmember Maloney, the City Council voted six (6) for and none (0) opposed, to approve the Consent Items. The motion carried unanimously. 8. REGULAR ITEMS 8.1. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding Ordinance No. 2023- 4474 amending the Comprehensive Plan to amend the Wellborn Community Plan and rename it the Wellborn District Plan, to amend the planning areas and future land use descriptions within Chapter 2. Distinctive Places, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Planning Areas Map, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Future Land Use & Character Map, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Functional Classification & Context Class Map, and to amend associated maps in the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan including the Proposed Bicycle Facilities Map and the Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Map. Michael Ostrowski, Planning and Development Director, stated that the Wellborn District Plan, an important priority project from the FY23 PDS Plan of Work, has been underway since January 2023. This item comes from Comprehensive Plan Action 2.2, to prioritize and undertake detailed small area plans for priority areas. The Wellborn area has experienced changed conditions in recent years and is facing continued development pressures for growth. The Wellborn District Plan aims to create a cohesive district that reflects the residents’ vision for the community, recognizes the unique character of Wellborn, and supports the overall vision of College Station. Staff engaged the community throughout the planning effort by hosting four working group meetings, five area-wide meetings, and a virtual area-wide meeting, as well as a virtual engagement website to gather community feedback. Additionally, staff coordinated with representatives from the Texas Department of Transportation on the future widening of FM 2154 and its impact on the planning area. City staff also worked internally to ensure the plan meets the needs of all departments and maintains the City’s excellent services. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this item at their October 5, 2023 meeting and recommended 5-0 to approve. The Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board heard this item at their September 18, 2023 meeting and recommended 7-0 to approve. At approximately 7:15 p.m., Mayor Nichols opened the Public Hearing. Dr. Walter Peacock, College Station, presented an argument against the ordinance proposed to approve amending the Comprehensive Plan to amend the Wellborn Community Plan and rename it the Wellborn District Plan along with associated proposed amended components as it stands. He opposes several of the changes due to the impacts to the proposed layouts, loss of property access, Page 21 of 344 CCM 101223 Minutes Page 6 potential loss of property and amenities due to the expanded ROW and additional utility right of way, significant loss of trees and water detention, increased noise, and air pollution. Gary Quade, College Station, came before council to oppose the use of round-a-bouts. Denise Barbier, Bryan, spoke on behalf of her mother who lives in College Station in the proposed area speaking in opposition to the ordinance. She stated that one-third of her mother’s property is being taken, TxDot is denying her access to her access, and she must change her address. Robert S. Cohen, College Station came before Council in opposition of the proposed ordinance. He stated several perceived problems with the Plan: He stated that the Wellborn Community did not request a Wellborn District, they do not want McCullough Rd to have a shared use pathway because they have rural roads, no curbs, open grass ditches, life Foxfire. There being no further comments, the Public Hearing was closed at 7:32 p.m. At approximately 8:00 p.m., Mayor Nichols opened the Public Hearing. Mike McCleary, College Station, spoke on not wanting a raise median and request Council to work with them against TxDot to push back on the road changes in Wellborn. There being no further comments, the Public Hearing was closed at 8:02 p.m. MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Wright and a second by Councilmember Maloney, the City Council voted four (4) for and two (2) opposed, with Councilmember Harvell and Yancy voting against, to adopt Ordinance No. 2023-4474, amending the Comprehensive Plan to amend the Wellborn Community Plan and rename it the Wellborn District Plan, to amend the planning areas and future land use descriptions within Chapter 2. Distinctive Places, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Planning Areas Map, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Future Land Use & Character Map, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Functional Classification & Context Class Map, and to amend associated maps in the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan including the Proposed Bicycle Facilities Map and the Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Map. The motion carried. 8.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Community Development Block Grant funding agreement with Elder Aid, Inc. in the amount of $85,000 for the acquisition of 1106 Carolina and a HOME Investment Partnership Program Community Housing Development Organization funding agreement with Elder Aid, Inc. in the amount of $159,475 for the demolition of a dilapidated structure and construction of a single-family house on the lot at 1106 Carolina to be used as an affordable rental unit for an income-eligible elderly household. Eric Barton, Community Services Analyst, stated that the 2020-2024 adopted Community Development Consolidated Plan and the 2024 Annual Action Plan identified the need to work with partners for the development of affordable housing for both homeowners and renters. Elder Aid is the only certified Community Housing Development Organization working in the City of College Station to create new affordable housing opportunities. Elder Aid works to minimize the stress of the elderly as they cope with affordable housing, health and wellness, inadequate funding for basic needs, loneliness, disabilities, and the loss of loved ones. Their mission is to ensure that the elderly in the Brazos Valley remain independent and in the community for as long as possible. Page 22 of 344 CCM 101223 Minutes Page 7 These two funding agreements total $244,475 and will allow Elder Aid to acquire the property at 1106 Carolina, demolish an existing substandard structure, and construct a new single-family home to meet the needs of a low-income, elderly household. Elder Aid will utilize $40,000 of agency funds to support the acquisition of this property. The property will be maintained by Elder Aid for 20 years as an affordable rental unit and a Land Use Restriction Agreement will be utilized as the legal mechanism to ensure the affordability period. Elder Aid has partnered with the City of College Station since 2015 and has received $2,515,518 to purchase 11 duplexes in College Station that created 22 affordable rental units for low-income elderly households. Elder Aid has successfully utilized the new construction model with funding from the City of Bryan through Community Development funds for many years. MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Wright and a second by Councilmember Harvell, the City Council voted six (6) for and none (0) opposed, to approve a Community Development Block Grant funding agreement with Elder Aid, Inc. in the amount of $85,000 for the acquisition of 1106 Carolina and a HOME Investment Partnership Program Community Housing Development Organization funding agreement with Elder Aid, Inc. in the amount of $159,475 for the demolition of a dilapidated structure and construction of a single-family house on the lot at 1106 Carolina to be used as an affordable rental unit for an income-eligible elderly household. The motion carried unanimously. 8.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a contract with Brinkley Sargent Wiginton Architects not to exceed $180,768 for a recreation center feasibility study. Jennifer Cain, Capital Projects Director, stated that This project will study the feasibility of a recreation center in College Station. The scope of the study will include two different phases. Phase one will focus on: •Discovery, analysis, and review of background information •Needs assessment. •Market analysis Following phase one, staff will provide an update to the City Council prior to moving forward into phase two. Phase two will focus on: •Concepts and operational projections •Design concept development •Operations assessment and cost analysis A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was released earlier this year and the city received 5 responses. Following the team evaluations, 3 firms were selected for interviews. Following the interviews, Brinkley Sargent Wiginton Architects was selected as the most qualified for this project. At approximately 8:38 p.m., Mayor Nichols opened for Citizen Comments. Dr. Karl Mooney, College Station, presented a video on the YMCA and the good relationships they have with the Cities they partner with. He encourages our city to become a partner with the YMCA as well, for the benefit of the community. There being no further comments, the Citizen Comments was closed at 8:47 p.m. MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Wright and a second by Councilmember Maloney, the City Council voted six (6) for and none (0) opposed, to approve a contract with Brinkley Page 23 of 344 CCM 101223 Minutes Page 8 Sargent Wiginton Architects not to exceed $180,768 for a recreation center feasibility study. The motion carried unanimously. 8.4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding appointments to the Housing Action Plan Steering Committee. David Brower, Community Services Analyst, stated that Council created the Housing Action Plan Steering Committee at their August 10, 2023 meeting by Resolution. The Housing Action Plan Steering Committee is comprised of no more than 13 Council-appointed volunteers, including a chair and co-chair. The Committee will disband or sunset on October 1st, 2024, or when the Housing Action Plan is adopted by the City Council, whichever comes first. MOTION: Upon a motion made by Mayor Nichols and a second by Councilmember Harvell, the City Council voted six (6) for and none (0) opposed, to approve the appointments of Geralyn Nolan, Blanche Brick (co-chair), Tiona Broussard, Fred E. Dupriest, Mike Alan Holmgreen, Blake Jennings, Carla Robinson, Dr. Charles Lane Barr, Katherine Nicole Flynn, Dr. Delia Perez-Nunez, Diana Maria Wood, Chair, Jodi Warner (chairperson), and Suzanne Droleskey to the Housing Action Plan Steering Committee. The motion carried unanimously. 10. Council Calendar Council reviewed the calendar. 11. Items of Community Interest: The Council may receive reports from a Council Member or City Staff about items of community interest for which notice has not been given, including: expressions of thanks, congratulations or condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; honorary or salutary recognitions of a public official, public employee, or other citizen; reminders of upcoming events organized or sponsored by the City of College Station; information about a social, ceremonial or community event organized or sponsored by an entity other than the City of College Station that is scheduled to be attended by a Council Member, another city official or staff of the City of College Station; and announcements involving an imminent threat to the public health and safety of people in the City of College Station that has arisen after the posting of the agenda. Mayor Nichols reminded the community about the City of College Station’s 85th Anniversary Celebration at City Hall on August 18th. Councilmembers Harvell and Maloney reported on the TML Annual Conference. Councilmember Yancy recognized the Farmers Market. 12. Council Reports on Committees, Boards, and Commission: A Council Member may make a report regarding meetings of City Council boards and commissions or meetings of boards and committees on which a Council Member serves as a representative that have met since the last council meeting. (Committees listed in Coversheet) Nothing to report at this time. 13. Future Agenda Items and Review of Standing List of Council Generated Future Agenda Items: A Council Member may make a request to City Council to place an item for which no Page 24 of 344 CCM 101223 Minutes Page 9 notice has been given on a future agenda or may inquire about the status of an item on the standing list of council generated future agenda items. A Council Member’s or City Staff’s response to the request or inquiry will be limited to a statement of specific factual information related to the request or inquiry or the recitation of existing policy in response to the request or inquiry. Any deliberation of or decision about the subject of a request will be limited to a proposal to place the subject on the agenda for a subsequent meeting. Councilmember Harvell requested an update from Fire and Police Departments on retention and recruiting. Councilmember Harvell requested a report from Electric on our solar power program. Councilmember Yancy requested an update on a potential convention center. Councilmember Cunha requested an overview of a potential Victoria round-a-bout. Mayor Nichols directed the City Manager to bring back to City Council a negotiated Inter-Local Agreement with the City of Bryan to address the East Side Sewer issues, the West Side Sewer issues, the Valley Park lift station, City of Bryan facilities located in College Station and direction on a Northeast Trunk Line route. 14. Adjournment. There being no further business, Mayor Nichols adjourned the meeting of the City Council at 9:21 p.m. on Thursday, October 12, 2023. ________________________ John P. Nichols, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Tanya Smith, City Secretary Page 25 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 7.2. Gateway Sign #3 TXDOT ILA Sponsor: Jennifer Cain, Director Capital Projects Reviewed By CBC: City Council Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a resolution authorizing an interlocal agreement for Gateway Monument Sign No. 3 with the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT). Relationship to Strategic Goals: Core Services and Infrastructure Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval. Summary: This project includes the construction of a gateway monument sign southwest of the intersection of SH47 and Highway 60 between the southeast-bound highway 47 and the western feeder road. The gateway monument will be located completely within TXDOT right-of-way and visible to the southeast-bound traffic along SH47. Budget & Financial Summary: A total project budget of $325,000 is included for this project in the Facilities and IT Capital Improvement Projects Fund. There is no fiscal impact with this agreement. Attachments: 1. Gateway Sign #3 - Resolution & ILA-SH 47 College Station 2. Gateway Sign #3 - Project Map Page 26 of 344 RESOLUTION NO. xx-xx-23-xxxxx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN A GATEWAY MONUMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE GATEWAY MONUMENT SIGN PROJECT AT SH47 AND SH60 BETWEEN SOUTHEAST BOUND SH47 AND THE WESTERN SH47 FEEDER ROAD. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas supports the City’s plan to construct the Gateway Monument Sign Project (“Project”) at SH47 and SH60; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas agrees to fund one-hundred percent (100%) of the Gateway Monument Sign Project construction costs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas as follows: PART 1: That the City Council hereby approves the Gateway Monument Agreement which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit “A”. PART 2: That the City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor to sign the Agreement. PART 3: That the City Council hereby agrees to fully fund the Gateway Monument Sign Project construction costs. PART 4: That this Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. ADOPTED this _______ day of ________________________, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: ______________________________ _________________________________ City Secretary MAYOR APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney Page 27 of 344 Contract No. 17-4XX0002 Interlocal Gateway Monument 1 of 7 04/27/2021 GATEWAY MONUMENT AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TRAVIS § THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "State", and the City of College Station, acting through its duly authorized officials, as evidenced by Resolution or Ordinance Number _____ __, dated ____ ___, hereinafter called the "Local Entity". BACKGROUND The State owns and maintains a system of highways, including SH 47 in Brazos County, Texas, for public use and benefit. The State agrees to allow for the construction of a Gateway Monument within the State’s right of way and the Local Entity agrees to construct the Monument and to conduct the long term maintenance for this structure located on SH 47 at FM 60 referred to as the "Gateway Monument," more specifically described in Attachment “A,” Project Map, which is attached hereto. The Local Entity will conduct the Monument's long term maintenance activities through the use of Local Entity forces, contractors, or other means satisfactory to the Local Entity and the State. THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Agreement, the parties agree to the following. A G R E E M E N T SECTION 1. PERIOD OF THE AGREEMENT This Agreement becomes effective when finally executed by the State and shall continue unless or until otherwise terminated as provided by this agreement. SECTION 2. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES All costs covered by this agreement including design, engineering, testing, construction, installation, access for maintenance, maintenance, labor, materials, supplies, traffic control, additional improvements, and if required, removal of the Gateway Monument, shall be the responsibility of the Local Entity. Any administrative costs associated with the Gateway Monument that are incurred by the State, such as those related to proposal review, as well as developing, issuing, and monitoring the Agreement for approved the Gateway Monument project shall be the responsibility of the State. Exhibit A Page 28 of 344 Contract No. 17-4XX0002 Interlocal Gateway Monument 04/27/2021 2 of 7 SECTION 3. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PARTIES A. The Local Entity agrees to: 1. Provide Gateway Monument design plans to the State before execution of this agreement according to State policy and, upon final approval, furnish and construct the Gateway Monument according to plans approved by the State, which are set out more specifically in Attachment “B,” Local Entity’s Final Gateway Monument Proposal, which is attached to this Agreement, and include any other related installation items that may be required; and 2. Furnish, erect, and maintain any barricades, signs and traffic handling devices, in accordance with the latest Texas Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and to the satisfaction of the State related to this project, as may be required to protect the safety of the public; and 3. Conduct periodic inspections of the Gateway Monument as deemed necessary; and 4. Provide for the construction and maintenance of all associated appurtenances that are considered by the State to be a part of the project. The Local Entity further agrees to remove such items from the project’s location and restore the area to the satisfaction of the State upon termination of this Agreement in accordance with Section 9. B. The State agrees to: 1. Review and evaluate the Gateway Monument proposal submitted by the Local Entity with due consideration to safety (location, potential for motorist distraction, accessibility for maintenance, etc.), aesthetics, community support and maintainability; and 2. Coordinate with other State Divisions, as appropriate, as well as interact with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for input, review and approval; and 3. Cooperate with the Local Entity to determine the requirements for barricades, signs, and traffic handling devices to be used by the Local Entity during the construction and maintenance of the Gateway Monument; and 4. Provide maintenance access to the project location for the Local Entity or for its Contractor or group, and if possible, from outside the highway right of way; and 5. Conduct periodic inspections of the Gateway Monument as deemed necessary. C. The Local Entity and State further agree that nothing contained in this Agreement will be construed to: 1. Give either party the power to direct and control the day-to-day activities of the other; or 2. Constitute the parties as partners, joint venturers, co-owners, or otherwise as participants in a joint or common undertaking; or allow either party to create or assume any obligation on behalf of the other party for any purpose whatsoever. Page 29 of 344 Contract No. 17-4XX0002 Interlocal Gateway Monument 04/27/2021 3 of 7 SECTION 4. DESIGN AND PLACEMENT OF GATEWAY MONUMENTS A. Gateway Monuments shall be designed and placed so as to: 1. Be freestanding. 2. Feature only the letters of the community name and/or officially adopted seal. 3. Include, if required by the State, approved protective graffiti coatings. 4. Be appropriate to its proposed setting and community context. 5. Be in proper size and scale with its surroundings. 6. Be composed of materials that are durable for the projected life span of the project. 7. Be located beyond the clear zone, for both main lane traffic and frontage road traffic. 8. Be located where maintenance can be safely performed, as specified in the Gateway Monument Agreement, and in conformance with State procedures. 9. Be subject to the review and approval of the State in consideration of design, size, and scale for appropriate integration on urban or rural highway features. B. Gateway Monuments shall not: 1. Be allowed within the center median areas of interstate highway rights-of-way. 2. Contain religious, political, special interest, private, or commercial messages of any sort, including, but not limited to, symbols, logos, business names, trade names, jingles, or slogans. 3. Contain any displays of any sort, advertising, decorative banners, flags, or flag poles. 4. Display telephone numbers, street addresses, or Internet addresses. 5. Interfere with airspace above the roadway. 6. Create a distraction to the motoring public; for example, the Gateway Monument shall be large enough to interpret at highway speed, but not be so large that it demands attention from the motorist. 7. Include reflective or glaring surface finishes. 8. Include illumination that impairs or distracts the vision of transportation system users. Other lighting may be permitted. 9. Display blinking or intermittent or moving lights, including changeable message signs, digital displays, or lighted static displays such as LED. 10. Include moving elements (kinetic art) or simulate movement. 11. Include water features of any sort. 12. Interfere with official traffic control devices, nor interfere with the operational right-of- way above the roadway. 13. Be placed within State right-of-way upon trees, or painted or drawn upon rocks or other existing natural features. 14. Make use of or simulate colors or combinations of colors usually reserved for official traffic control devices described in the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 15. Require the removal of trees or other vegetation for visibility, or harm trees during construction. Pruning of tree branches or roots, and removal of shrubs should be avoided. 16. Negatively impact existing highway features, including existing signs, irrigation systems, necessary drainage patterns, and facilities. Page 30 of 344 Contract No. 17-4XX0002 Interlocal Gateway Monument 04/27/2021 4 of 7 SECTION 5. MAINTENANCE The Local Entity shall provide regularly scheduled maintenance, as described in Attachment “B,” the Local Entity’s Final Gateway Monument Proposal, for its projected lifespan. Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to, restoration work to maintain the integrity of the approved Gateway Monument, maintenance of any associated landscaping or lighting, and graffiti removal. Gateway Monuments shall be kept clean, free of graffiti, and in good repair. Graffiti removal shall conform to the most current State policies and guidelines, which require prompt removal of offensive messages and timely removal of all other graffiti. Maintenance practices of the Local Entity or its agent shall protect air and water quality as required by federal and state law. SECTION 6. MONUMENT REMOVAL The Local Entity shall remove the Gateway Monument covered by this agreement, if in the opinion of the State, it creates safety or operational concerns due to deterioration or inadequate maintenance or upon termination of the main Gateway Monument Agreement. The State will notify the Local Entity when it has determined that the Gateway Monument requires special attention. In the event the Local Entity fails to maintain, repair, rehabilitate, or remove the Gateway Monument in a timely manner, the State may choose to remove the Gateway Monument after thirty (30) days following notification to the Local Entity, and bill the Local Entity for all costs of removal and restoration of the area. The State reserves the right to remove the Gateway Monument due to construction, rehabilitation, violation of the terms of this agreement, or other necessary activities affecting the transportation facilities without any obligation, compensation to, or approval of the Local Entity. The State will strive to notify the Local Entity of its intent to remove the Gateway Monument to allow for timely removal and salvage by the Local Entity, if possible. The State reserves the right to remove or alter any Gateway Monument that presents an immediate safety hazard to the public without delay or advanced notification to the Local Entity. SECTION 7. USE OF CONTRACTOR OR GROUP The Local Entity shall have the right to engage any responsible Contractor or group to perform or provide any portion of the Local Entity's Gateway Monument activities specified in this Agreement. However, notwithstanding this provision, the Local Entity shall continue to remain responsible to the State to ensure performance of all its duties and responsibilities specified in this Agreement. The Local Entity shall ensure that any Contractor or group complies with all provisions of this agreement, and federal, state, and local laws, and regulations as may be applicable. In the event the Local Entity engages a Contractor to perform Gateway Monument construction or maintenance activities under this Agreement, the Local Entity shall ensure that said Contractor shall indemnify the State for any and all damages and claims for damages by said Contractor, its employees, agents, or representatives, including any claims resulting from bodily injury or death to others, or, for loss of or damage to property of others, arising out of, incident to, or in any manner connected to Gateway Monument construction or maintenance Page 31 of 344 Contract No. 17-4XX0002 Interlocal Gateway Monument 04/27/2021 5 of 7 activities, and, for any or all liability arising from the negligent acts of said Contractor, its employees, agents, or representatives. In the event the Local Entity engages and approves a responsible group to perform Gateway Monument construction or maintenance activities under this Agreement, the Local Entity shall require and ensure that said Contractor or group follow all the terms of this Agreement as well as all Attachments. SECTION 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Local Entity and the State each acknowledge responsibility for the acts, deeds, errors and omissions of its own employees. The parties agree that the Texas Tort Claims Act pertaining to governmental liability for tortious conduct and/or property damage shall apply to this Agreement. The Local Entity shall also indemnify and save harmless the State from any and all expense, including, but not limited to, attorney fees, which may be incurred by the State in litigation or otherwise resisting a claim or liabilities that may be imposed on the State as a result of error, omission, or act of the Local Entity, its agents, or its employees. SECTION 9. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated under any of the following conditions: A. By mutual written agreement and consent of both parties; or B. By either party upon giving the other party thirty (30) days prior written notice; or C. By the State, in the event the State determines that the Gateway Monument is not in the best interest of the traveling public. If either party terminates this Agreement, as provided herein, the Local Entity will be responsible for repair or removal of the Gateway Monument. In the event that the Local Entity does not provide the repair or removal services, the State may remove or repair the Gateway Monument and shall be entitled to reimbursement from the Local Entity for any reasonable costs incurred by the State to restore the State's right of way to its original condition. SECTION 10. AMENDMENTS Amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be executed by both parties. SECTION 11. AUDIT The state auditor may conduct an audit or investigation of any entity receiving funds from the state directly under the contract or indirectly through a subcontract under the contract. Acceptance of funds directly under the contract or indirectly through a subcontract under this contract acts as acceptance of the authority of the state auditor, under the direction of the legislative audit committee, to conduct an audit or investigation in connection with those funds. An entity that is the subject of an audit or investigation must provide the state auditor with access to any information the state auditor considers relevant to the investigation or audit. Page 32 of 344 Contract No. 17-4XX0002 Interlocal Gateway Monument 04/27/2021 6 of 7 SECTION 12. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS Subject to the provisions of Section 7, the Local Entity shall not assign or otherwise transfer its rights and obligations under this Agreement except with prior written consent of the State, and any prohibited assignment or transfer shall be null and void. SECTION 13. REMEDIES This Agreement shall not be considered as specifying the exclusive remedy for any default. All legal remedies may be pursued by either party and shall be cumulative. SECTION 14. INSURANCE If this agreement authorizes the Local Entity or its contractor to perform any work on State right of way, before beginning work, the entity performing the work shall provide the State with a fully executed copy of the State's Form 1560 Certificate of Insurance verifying the existence of coverage in the amounts and types specified on the Certificate of Insurance for all persons and entities working on the State right of way. This coverage shall be maintained until all work on the State right of way is complete. If coverage is not maintained, all work on State right of way shall cease immediately, and the State may recover damages and all costs of completing the work. SECTION 15. NOTICES All notices to either party by the other under this Agreement shall be delivered personally or sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, addressed to such party at the following addresses: STATE : Texas Department of Transportation District Engineer 2591 North Earl Rudder Freeway Bryan, Texas 77803 LOCAL ENTITY: City of College Station Attn: Director of Public Works P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 SECTION 16. GRATUITIES Texas Transportation Commission policy mandates that employees of the State shall not accept any benefits, gifts, or favors from any person doing business or who reasonably speaking may do business with the State under this Agreement. Any person doing business with or who may reasonably speaking do business with the State under this Agreement may not make any offer of benefits, gifts or favors to State employees. Failure on the part of the Local Entity to adhere to this policy may result in the termination of this Agreement. Page 33 of 344 Contract No. 17-4XX0002 Interlocal Gateway Monument 04/27/2021 7 of 7 SECTION 17. INCORPORATION OF PROVISIONS Attachments “A” and “B” are made part of this contract. The parties shall comply with the provisions of Attachments “A” and “B” as if they were set forth in full within the body of this contract. SECTION 18. SIGNATORY WARRANTY Each signatory warrants that the signatory has necessary authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the entity represented. THEREFORE, the Parties have executed this Agreement in duplicate originals. THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION THE STATE OF TEXAS Certified as being executed for the By: _______________________ purpose and effect of activating and/or carrying out the orders, Title: _____________________ established policies or work programs heretofore approved and authorized Date: _____________________ by The Texas Transportation Commission Attest: ____________________ By: ______________________ City Clerk Bryan District Engineer Date: ____________________ Approved as to form: __________________________ City Attorney List of Attachments: “A” – Project Map for Gateway Monument “B” - Local Entity’s Final Gateway Monument Proposal Page 34 of 344 Contract No. 17-4XX0002 Attachment A 1 of 1 Attachment A Project Map for Gateway Monument Page 35 of 344 Contract No. 17-4XX0002 Attachment B ATTACHMENT B Local Entity’s Final Gateway Monument Proposal Page 36 of 344 Page 37 of 344 Page 38 of 344 Page 39 of 344 6-8-2023 PGAL TBPE REG. NO: F-2742 Page 40 of 344 6-8-2023 PGAL TBPE REG. NO: F-2742 Page 41 of 344 1STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN DETAILSFILE NAME:PROJECT LOCATIONPROJECT NAMESHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEREGISTRATIONDRAWING HISTORYARCHITECTCLIENTDATESTAMP:PROJECT NUMBERwww.pgal.comHouston, TX 77042Suite 2003131 Briarpark Dr.PGALF 713 622 1444T 713 622 1444Nov. 202211/9/2022 1:27:12 PM C1.22STORM WATERPOLLUTIONPREVENTIONPLAN DETAILSCITY OFCOLLEGESTATION ENTRYMONUMENTSIGNHWY 47 ANDHWY 60INTERSECTIONCITY OF COLLEGESTATION T 979-764-3500Copyright © 20231101 TEXAS AVE.COLLEGESTATION, TX 778401003715№. DATEDESCRIPTIONPGAL TBPE REG. NO: F-27426-8-2023Page 42 of 344 GENERAL NOTES:FILE NAME:PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT NAME SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE REGISTRATION DRAWING HISTORY ARCHITECT CLIENT DATESTAMP:PROJECT NUMBER www.pgal.com Houston, TX 77042 Suite 200 3131 Briarpark Dr. PGAL F 713 622 1444 T 713 622 1444 Nov. 2022 11/9/2022 1:27:12 PMS1.01 STRUCTURAL PLAN DETAILS CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN HWY 47 AND HWY 60 INTERSECTION CITY OF COLLEGE STATION T 979-764-3500 Copyright © 2022 1101 TEXAS AVE. COLLEGESTATION, TX 77840 1003715 №. DATE DESCRIPTION 06/09/2023 Page 43 of 344 City of College Station Gateway Monument Sign Maintenance Plan Location: The monument will be located between the southeast bound frontage road and main lanes south of Highway 47 at the intersection of Highway 60 within the TXDOT Right of Way. The sign location is accessible by the southeast bound feeder road and there is ample room on the site for staging for construction and maintenance activities. Traffic Control will not be needed for maintenance activities. Description: The monument will be constructed with durable materials on a structural foundation. There will be no landscaping features requiring irrigation or maintenance. Maintenance Requirements: Monument: For the first year the contractor will be responsible for maintenance and repairs to the sign. Once the 1-year construction warranty has expired the City of College Station will take over responsibility for maintenance and repairs. The monument will be inspected on a quarterly basis yearly and maintenance activities or repairs will take place as they are required. Maintenance will include restoration work to maintain the integrity of the approved Gateway Monument, maintenance of lighting/solar system, and graffiti removal as required. The monument will be kept clean, free of graffiti and in good repair. Graffiti removal shall conform to the most current TXDOT policies and guidelines, which require prompt removal of offensive messages and timely removal of all other graffiti. Landscaping: The surrounding grass area will be mowed by typical TXDOT mowing schedules, however additional weed edging needed to keep the sign from being overgrown with weeds and grass will be done by the City of College Station as needed throughout the year. Page 44 of 344 Project Map GG1901 City Gateway Sign #3 (West) Page 45 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 7.3. Resolution authorizing BOR WaterSMART Drought Response Program Grant Application Sponsor: Stephen Maldanado Reviewed By CBC: City Council Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a resolution authorizing the application for the Bureau of Reclamation Water Resources and Planning Office WaterSMART Drought Response Program for the Well 6 Capacity Rehabilitation project. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Good Governance, Financial Sustainability, Core Services & Infrastructure, Sustainable City Recommendation(s): Staff recommends Council consider adopting the resolution. Summary: The City of College Station is seeking authorization to apply for a grant for approximately $500,000 from the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Water Resources and Planning Office WaterSMART Drought Response Program to be used for the Well #6 Capacity Rehabilitation project. The grant application is due on October 30th. This resolution is a requirement for the grant application. The grant requires a 50% match. Match funds are available in the Water Services budget. The purpose of this project is to regain lost well production capacity due to the groundwater levels dropping since the 2016 rehab. This well has a permitted maximum capacity of 3,400 GPM with a maximum annual production of 2,791 acre-feet. This project will provide rehabilitation efforts to increase the reliability of this water source. This project will include the design, bidding, and construction. This project consists of replacing the well motor, discharge head, pump and column pipe within the existing well casing. The well casing will be inspected, cleaned, and tested. The new pump will be installed at a deeper setting and tested to confirm performance is in accordance with contract specifications. Additional repairs/equipment will be included as necessary. Budget & Financial Summary: Receipt of approximately $500,000 in BOR WaterSMART Drought Response Program Grant Funding. Matching funds are available in the Water Services Budget. Attachments: 1. BOR WaterSMART Grant Resolution Page 46 of 344 RESOLUTION NO. _______________ A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF RECLAMATION FOR A WATERSMART DROUGHT RESPONSE PROGRAM: DROUGHT RESILIENCY PROJECTS GRANT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 FOR THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION WELL 6 REHABILITATION PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City of College Station (“City”) is a unit of local government with public water supply delivery authority within the United States; and WHEREAS, the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation has issued a funding opportunity under the WaterSMART Drought Response Program: Drought Resiliency Projects for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024; and WHEREAS, the City of College Station has identified locations with groundwater systems that require rehabilitation to return capabilities; and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the City of College Station to facilitate submission of a WaterSMART Drought Response Program: Drought Resiliency Projects Grant for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 to fund a project whose result is return of capabilities of groundwater; and WHEREAS, the City of College Station intends to appropriate funds in the 2024-2025 fiscal years and staff time to meet the required fifty percent cost match commitment for the City of College Station Well 6 Rehabilitation Project; and WHEREAS, the City of College Station is desirous of submitting a WaterSMART Grant application to assist in funding of said project to return capabilities and water loss and enhance conservation in the City’s public water supply service area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of College Station as follows: PART 1: The City Council hereby approves the WaterSMART: Drought Resiliency Grant for FY 2024 to the Bureau of Reclamation. PART 2: That the City Council hereby authorizes and designates the City Manager or his designee to sign all required applications, certifications, evaluations, and other forms required by BOR for the WaterSMART: Drought Resiliency Grant for FY2024 on behalf of the City of College Station. PART 3: That this resolution shall take effect immediate from and after its passage. ADOPTED this ____ day of ______ A.D. 2023 Page 47 of 344 ATTEST: APPROVED: ____________________________ _______________________________ City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: ____________________________ City Attorney Page 48 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 7.4. License to Encroach - 4138 Jeanne Drive Sponsor: Anthony Armstrong Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a resolution authorizing a license agreement with Wolf Den BCS, LLC pertaining to the approximately 0.41 square foot building encroachment, into the 15-foot public utility easement located on Lot 5, Block 1 of the Wolf Den Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in volume 18520, page 28 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, more commonly known as 4138 Jeanne Drive. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval. Summary: The applicant has indicated that due to a contractor error, a 0.41 square foot section of the single-family home that was constructed on the property at 4138 Jeanne Drive was constructed into the limits of a 15-foot public utility easement (PUE). The encroachment does not conflict with any utilities and consent has been granted by all City departments and franchised utilities. Furthermore, the encroachments have negligible impact on any needed public access due to their size. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Resolution Exhibit A - License Agreement 3. License Agreement Exhibit A 4. Vicinity Map 5. Location Map 6. Application Page 49 of 344 RESOLUTION NO.___________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION AND WOLF DEN BCS, LLC PERTAINING TO THE APPROXIMATELY 0.41 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ENCROACHMENT, INTO THE 15-FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 5, BLOCK 1 OF THE WOLF DEN SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 18520, PAGE 28 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. WHEREAS, the City of College Station, has received an application for a license to encroach into a public utility easement; and WHEREAS, the City of College Station has enacted Ordinance No. 1645 regulating, controlling and governing encroachments into the City’s easements; and WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to accept the terms of the License Agreement as presented to them; and WHEREAS, in order for a license to be granted by the City Council of the City of College Station, the Council must make certain findings; now, therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION: PART 1: That after hearing the application of Wolf Den BCS, LLC to encroach into the public utility easement, the City Council of the City of College Station, finds the following: 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property involved such that the strict enforcement of encroachment policies would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the property. 2. That the license is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial property right of the applicant. 3. That the utilization of the easement area for the access to and the operation of utilities, including drainage, will not be impaired. 4. That the granting of the license will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or injurious to another party in the area. PART 2:That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City of College Station a License Agreement with Wolf Den BCS, LLC pertaining to the encroachment of a portion of a structure located at Lot 5, Block 1 of the Wolf Den Subdivision, into the public utility easement area. The terms of said License Agreement are as set forth in the form which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. ADOPTED this 26th Day of October, 2023. Page 50 of 344 Resolution No.____________ Page 2 ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 51 of 344 LICENSE AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS * * KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF BRAZOS * That the City of College Station (hereinafter referred to as "LICENSOR"), acting through the undersigned official who is so empowered by resolution of the City Council to so act in consideration of the agreement made herein by Wolf Den BCS, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "LICENSEE"), owner of Lot 5, Block 1 of the Wolf Den Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Volume 18520, Page 28 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, hereby grants a license to the said LICENSEE to permit a portion of a structure located on a portion of Lot 5, Block 1 of the Wolf Den Subdivision, College Station, Texas, to encroach upon the 15-foot Public Utility Easement, as described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, owned and occupied by the City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas, but such improvements shall be at all times under and not in contact with any electric, water, sewer, or other utility, or equipment, or interfere in any way with such utility, including any drainage structures which are servicing the improvements and other property, and subject to the following terms and conditions: Neither the granting of the license, nor any related permit, constitutes an abandonment by LICENSOR of its property, easement or easements, or any other rights in and to the above- described property. LICENSEE expressly stipulating and agreeing by LICENSEE's acceptance of this license that LICENSEE neither asserts nor claims any interest or right of any type or nature whatsoever, legal, equitable or otherwise in or to LICENSOR's property. LICENSEE hereby expressly covenants, stipulates and agrees, without limitation, to indemnify and defend the LICENSOR and hold it harmless from any and all liability, claim, cause of action, and cost, including attorneys' fee, and including any acts or omissions of the LICENSOR, its officers, agents, and employees, which may grow out of or be attributable to the granting by the LICENSOR of said license and any supplemental license which may hereafter be issued in connection herewith including any inspections which may be conducted in connection with or pursuant to said license or any supplemental license. LICENSEE, at its own expense, shall restore or cause to be restored the subject property to as good a condition as existed prior to construction of the improvements which are the subject of this License Agreement. LICENSEE shall pay all costs of relocation of any public utilities or facilities that may be incurred as a result of the proposed construction or actual construction. LICENSEE agrees to comply with all laws and ordinances in the construction and maintenance of said improvements. LICENSOR retains the right, but not the obligation, to enter upon the land to which this license applies and at LICENSEE's expense to remove any structure or improvements or alterations thereon upon the determination by LICENSOR that such removal is necessary for exercising LICENSOR's rights or duties in regard to said easement, or for protecting persons or property, or public interest in regard to said public. This license, until its expiration or revocation, shall run with the title to the above-described real property, and the terms and conditions hereof shall be binding upon subsequent owners or holders thereof. LICENSEE shall cause any immediate successors in interest to have factual notice of this License Agreement. This license shall expire automatically upon removal of the improvements located upon the property pursuant to this license, and shall expire as to any portion of said improvements upon the removal, whether or not all of the proposed improvements are removed. This license is revocable by the LICENSOR upon the occurrence of any of the following conditions or events: A. LICENSEE or its successors or assigns have failed to comply with the terms of the granting of the license; or B. The improvements located thereon or any portion of them interfere with the rights of the LICENSOR or the public in or to LICENSOR's property; or C. The use of the licensed area becomes necessary for a public purpose; or D. Said improvements or a portion of them constitute a danger to the public which is not remediable by maintenance or alteration of the said improvements; or Page 52 of 344 - 2 - E. Said improvements or a portion of them have expanded beyond the scope of the license; or F. Maintenance or alteration necessary to alleviate danger to the public has not been made within a reasonable time after the dangerous condition has arisen. This license shall be effective upon the acceptance of the terms hereof by the LICENSEE, as indicated by the signature of LICENSEE. The license shall be filed of record in the Official Public Records of the County Clerk of the Brazos County Courthouse. APPROVED this the ________ day of ______________________, 2023. APPROVED: APPROVED: WOLF DEN BCS, LLC CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, LICENSEE LICENSOR BY: WOLF DEN LIVING TRUST, Manager of BY:__________________________ WOLF DEN BCS, LLC JOHN NICHOLS, Mayor BY:_________________________ TERRENCE C. MURPHY, Trustee ATTEST: BY:_________________________ ______________________________ ERICA D. MURPHY, Trustee TANYA SMITH, City Secretary STATE OF TEXAS ) ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF BRAZOS ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____ day of ________________, 2023, by JOHN NICHOLS, as Mayor of the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, a Texas Municipal Corporation, on behalf of said Corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public in and for the State of T E X A S STATE OF TEXAS ) ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF BRAZOS ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____ day of _______________________, 2023, by TERRENCE C. MURPHY as Trustee of WOLF DEN LIVING TRUST, Manager of WOLF DEN BCS, LLC, on behalf of said WOLF DEN BCS, LLC. ____________________________________ Notary Public in and for the State of Texas STATE OF TEXAS ) ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF BRAZOS ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____ day of _______________________, 2023, by ERICA D. MURPHY as Trustee of WOLF DEN LIVING TRUST, Manager of WOLF DEN BCS, LLC, on behalf of said WOLF DEN BCS, LLC. ____________________________________ Notary Public in and for the State of Texas Page 53 of 344 Page 54 of 344 Page 55 of 344 Page 56 of 344 Page 57 of 344 Page 58 of 344 Page 59 of 344 Page 60 of 344 Page 61 of 344 Page 62 of 344 Page 63 of 344 Page 64 of 344 Page 65 of 344 Page 66 of 344 Page 67 of 344 Engineering Manager Frontier Page 68 of 344 Page 69 of 344 Page 70 of 344 X Public Works Director City of College Station Application for License to Encroach of a Public Utility Easement Location: 4138 Jeanne Drive EXHIBIT NO.4 The undersigned, City staff of the City of College Station, certify that they have carefully considered the Application for License to Encroach of a Public Utility Easement referred to above the standpoint of City of College Station ordinances and with respect to recent and future needs of the City of College Station and see no objection to the requested abandonment from the City’s standpoint. X City Engineer City of College Station X Building Official City of College Station X Zoning Official City of College Station X Fire Marshal City of College Station X Elecrtic Department City of College Station X Water Services Department City of College Station Page 71 of 344 Page 72 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 7.5. Purchase Agreement Renewal with the Reynolds Company Sponsor: Gary Mechler, Director of Water Reviewed By CBC: City Council Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a contract renewal with the Reynolds Company, LLC for the annual purchase of Water SCADA infrastructure products and services for an amount not to exceed $216,000. Relationship to Strategic Goals: 1. Financially Sustainable City 2. Core Services and Infrastructure Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval to renew contract #20300063. Summary: In 2020, the City entered into Contract #20300063 with the Reynolds Company, LLC for the annual purchase of Rockwell Automation products and services. This original contract included renewal options for up to four (4) additional years. This annual contract has been previously renewed three (3) times. This item is considered the fourth, and final, one year extension of Contract 20300063 with the Reynolds Company for established pricing of Rockwell Automation products and services. Water Services has standardized the use of Rockwell Automation hardware and software products throughout its Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system. The Reynolds Company, LLC is the sole distributor of Rockwell Automation products and services for our area. Because the Reynolds Company, LLC’s products and services represent the best value for the City of College Station’s water system, staff recommends the renewal of this annual purchase agreement for a one (1) year period. Budget & Financial Summary: Water and wastewater operational funds are budgeted and available for this agreement. Attachments: 1. Renewal Four (4) of Contract #20300063 Page 73 of 344 CONTRACT & AGREEMENT ROUTING FORM __Original(s) sent to CSO on _____ Scanned into Laserfiche on _________ ____Original(s) sent to Fiscal on ________ CONTRACT#: _______ PROJECT#: _________ BID/RFP/RFQ#: _______ Project Name / Contract Description: _____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Name of Contractor: ____________________________________________________________ CONTRACT TOTAL VALUE: $ _________________ Grant Funded Yes No If yes, what is the grant number: Debarment Check Yes No N/A Davis Bacon Wages Used Yes No N/A Section 3 Plan Incl. Yes No N/A Buy America Required Yes No N/A Transparency Report Yes No N/A NEW CONTRACT RENEWAL # _____ CHANGE ORDER # _____ OTHER ______________ BUDGETARY AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Include number of bids solicited, number of bids received, funding source, budget vs. actual cost, summary tabulation) ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ (If required)* CRC Approval Date*: __________ Council Approval Date*: ____________ Agenda Item No*: ______ --Section to be completed by Risk, Purchasing or City Secretary’s Office Only— Insurance Certificates: ______ Performance Bond: ________ Payment Bond: ________ Info Tech: _______ SIGNATURES RECOMMENDING APPROVAL __________________________________________ _________________________________ DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR/ADMINISTERING CONTRACT DATE __________________________________________ _________________________________ LEGAL DEPARTMENT DATE __________________________________________ _________________________________ ASST CITY MGR – CFO DATE APPROVED & EXECUTED __________________________________________ _________________________________ CITY MANAGER DATE __________________________________________ _________________________________ MAYOR (if applicable) DATE __________________________________________ _________________________________ CITY SECRETARY (if applicable) DATE Page 74 of 344 ****************************************************************************** RENEWAL (4) ACCEPTANCE By signing herewith, I acknowledge and agree to renew Contract No. 20300063 Master Agreement for Rockwell Automation Products and Services, in accordance with all terms and conditions previously agreed to and accept, for an amount not to exceed Two Hundred Sixteen Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($216,000.00), this increase is due to the addition of software and maintenance. I understand this renewal agreement will be for the period beginning November 1, 2023, through November 1, 2024. This is the fourth and final renewal option available. D. REYNOLDS COMPANY, LLC dba THE REYNOLDS COMPANY CITY OF COLLEGE STATION By: By: Printed Name: City Manager Title: Date: ________________ Date: APPROVED: City Attorney Date: _____________ Asst. City Manager/CFO Date: _____________ Page 75 of 344 US Rates (USD) Scheduled Emergency Travel Overnight Expenses Receipts Standard Product Support $280/hr $361/hr 10% $62.40/day; $285/event LV Drive Startup Support $235/hr $361/hr Medium Voltage Product Support $340/hr $420/hr RATES AND DELIVERY TERMS All Callout services list prices shown exclude travel expenses, freight, customs or visa fees, taxes, or similar charges. Callout services are not to be used on fixed scope projects and contracts. STANDARD Rate: Applies to all labor provided Monday through Friday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. local time (excluding Rockwell Automation observed holidays), up to eight hours per day.STANDARD PRODUCT SUPPORT: Applies to all Allen-Bradley® and FactoryTalk® software branded products not covered in another section. LV DRIVE STARTUP ASSISTANCE RATE: Applies to all labor to help with startup activities of a new Rockwell Automation low voltage drive. Rate does not apply on coordinated drive systems. Must be scheduled 48 hours in advance of service or emergency rates apply. MEDIUM VOLTAGE PRODUCT SUPPORT: Applies when a service visit requires a Field Service Professional to perform service on a Medium Voltage product. Medium Voltage Startup, Preventive Maintenance, and Field Modifications cannot be delivered through callout services and will require a separate proposal for these services. EMERGENCY: Applies to all service requested and delivered within 48 hours of contact with Rockwell Automation Customer Care. OVERTIME RATE: Charged at 1.5x the Scheduled or Emergency Rate.* Applies to all labor provided beyond eight hours per day, Monday through Friday; to all labor provided between 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., Monday through Friday; and to all laborprovided all day Saturday.SUNDAY/HOLIDAY RATE: Charged at 2.0x the Scheduled or Emergency Rate.* Applies to all labor provided on Sundays and Holidays (as recognized by Rockwell Automation). *1.5x and 2.0x are approximate and may be slightly above or below the exact multiple due to whole dollar rounding calculations. FIELD SERVICES (NORTH AMERICA) $550/nt $235/hr Cost + Rates effective 6/4/2023 – 6/1/2024 (Subject to change) Included in this document are the list prices and general terms and conditions of delivery for Field Services/ Callout Services. Callout services may be delivered remotely. Contact your local authorized Allen-Bradley distributor or the Rockwell Automation Call Management Center at 1-888-382-1583 for service dispatch. Page 76 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 8.1. Off-Campus Student Services Office operations Sponsor: Barbara Moore, Assistant to the City Manager Reviewed By CBC: City Council Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on an update on Texas A&M Off- Campus Student Services Office operations. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Good Governance Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): Staff recommends council receive an update on the revamped Off-Campus Student Services Office Operations. Summary: The presentation will focus on the revamped Off-Campus Student Services office, newly hired staff, and efforts to educate, assist and inform off-campus students on housing and code enforcement related issues in the city. Also, there will be some discussion on the collaborative efforts of the Off-Campus Student Services office, the Student Life office and various city departments to work on off-campus student housing issues. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: None Page 77 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 9.1. Texas Music Friendly Advisory Committee Resolution Sponsor: Brian Piscacek, Economic Development Manager Reviewed By CBC: City Council Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action related to the resolution creating a Texas Music Friendly Advisory Committee. Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommend that Council approve the resolution. Summary: In March 2023, the City of College Station initiated the certification process to become Texas Music Friendly and hosted a Texas Music Friendly workshop that was open to the general public. Since the workshop, College Station has been working through the required certification steps in order to accomplish being one of Texas’ music friendly cities and will be presented as the fifty-first Texas Music Friendly City on November 2, 2023. During this process, staff have adopted a monthly gathering for local musicians known as "Hang Out & Tune In". These monthly mixers allow local musicians to network with one another, hear from individuals in the music industry, connect with venue owners, and showcase their talent during an open mic hour. The Texas Music Friendly program was first introduced in 2016 by the Texas Music Office and is the only Music Friendly Community Program in the U.S. This program provides Texas communities with a network to foster music industry growth and development. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Resolution Music Friendly Advisory Board Page 78 of 344 RESOLUTION NO. ____________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, CREATING A TEXAS MUSIC FRIENDLY ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO PROMOTE AND FOSTER THE MUSIC INDUSTRY IN COLLEGE STATION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas, desires to have a Texas Music Friendly Advisory Committee to promote and foster the music industry in College Station; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas, believes the creation of a Texas Music Friendly Advisory Committee will assist in providing strategic direction to promote and support the industries within the city that directly impact the commercial music ecosystem; WHEREAS, the City Council believes the creation of a Texas Music Friendly Advisory Committee will effectively raise the profile of College Station as a music friendly destination; and WHEREAS, the City Council will seek qualified individuals to serve on the Texas Music Friendly Advisory Committee with previous or current experiences in the music industry, who have an interest in seeing our local music industry thrive; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That the City Council of the City of College Station shall create a Texas Music Friendly Advisory Committee. PART 2: That the Texas Music Friendly Advisory Committee shall be composed of up to twenty-five (25) local individuals qualified as set forth in the preamble. PART 3: That the City Council gives the Committee the following charge: “As subject matter experts in the music industry, elevate the College Station music industry by providing guidance; encouraging talent; creating a community amongst musicians, venues, and vendors; and strategically addressing opportunities for economic growth of the College Station music economy.” PART 4: That the City Council of the City of College Station shall delegate authority to the City Manager or his designee to appoint, remove, and fill vacancies for all members of the Texas Music Friendly Advisory Committee. PART 5: That the Committee of selected members shall ultimately make recommendations for the growth of the College Station music industry and through the Department of Economic Development and Tourism of the City of College Station provide advisory recommendations to City Council. PART 6: That this Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. ADOPTED this _______ day of ________________________, 20__. Page 79 of 344 ATTEST: APPROVED: ______________________________ _________________________________ City Secretary MAYOR APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney Page 80 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 9.2. Abandonment - 802 Dexter Drive South Sponsor: Parker Mathews Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on an ordinance vacating and abandoning a 0.058-acre portion of right-of-way, generally located between Lots 5, 6, & 7 of Block 1 of the Southeast College Park Subdivision, also known as 802 Dexter Drive South. Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Core Services & Infrastructure • Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval. Summary: The right-of-way abandonment is being requested by the applicant to remediate a discrepancy between city and county platting. The original orientation of this property included a 15’ alley, however a replat was filed at the county that matches the current developed condition of the property. This discrepancy was identified as the owner is wishing to replat the lot to adjust lot lines. The purpose of the abandonment is to remove the existing city ROW from the already developed lot. Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit A 3. Vicinity Map 4. Location Map 5. Application Page 81 of 344 Ordinance Form 8-14-17 ORDINANCE NO. _________________ AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE FINDINGS AND VACATING AND ABANDONING A 0.058 ACRE PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY, GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN LOTS 5, 6, & 7 OF BLOCK 1 OF THE SOUTHEAST COLLEGE PARK SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOL. 119, PAGE 563, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. WHEREAS, the City of College Station, Texas, has received an application for the vacation and abandonment of a 0.058-acre portion of right-of-way, said portion is generally located between Lots 5, 6, & 7 of Block 1 of the Southeast College Park Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Vol. 119, Page 563, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas and as described in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto (such portion hereinafter referred to as the “Right-of-Way”); and WHEREAS, in order for the right-of-way to be vacated and abandoned by the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas, the City Council must make certain affirmative findings; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1:That after opening and closing a public hearing, the City Council finds the following pertaining to the vacating and abandoning of the right-of-way described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. 1.Abandonment of the right-of-way will not result in property that does not have access to public roadways or utilities. 2.There is no public need or use for the right-of-way. 3.There is no anticipated future public need or use for the right-of-way. 4.Abandonment of the right-of-way will not impact access for all public utilities to serve current and future customers. PART 2:That the right-of-way as described in Exhibit “A” be abandoned and vacated by the City. Page 82 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 2 of 2 Ordinance Form 8-14-17 PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this 26th day of October, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: _____________________________ _____________________________ City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney Page 83 of 344 Page 84 of 344 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION Being a tract of land containing 0.0580 acres, being a portion of a 15' alley, adjoining Lots 5, 6 and 7, Block 1 of Southeast College Park Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, as plat recorded in Vol. 119, Page 563, of the Brazos County Official Records (B.C.O.R.), also being a portion of the tract recorded in Vol. 10610, Page 89 of the B.C.O.R. All bearings of this survey are referenced to the Texas State Plane Coordinate System, Central Zone, NAD83(2011) Epoch 2010, and boundary referenced to 1/2” iron rods and 1/2" iron pipe found and referred to in the previously recorded plat, and as surveyed on the ground on August 19th of 2022. This description is also referred to the plat prepared by ATM Surveying, Project No. 2022-04613, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a 1/2" iron pipe found for the south corner of the Scott C. Quinn and Glenda K. Quinn called parts of Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 1 and part of an alley, as recorded in Vol. 10610, Page 89 of the B.C.O.R., also being the west corner of the Michael D. Macicek and Amber M. Macicek called 0.255 acres, called part of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, as recorded in Vol. 13156, Page 142 of the B.C.O.R., also being a point in the northeast line of the Georgia and John Williams called 1.06 acres, called all of Lot 4 and part of Lots 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 1, as recorded in Vol. 17781, Page 93 of the B.C.O.R. THENCE North 46°56’41” West, a distance of 16.05 feet along the common line between said Macicek tract and said Williams tract to a calculated south corner of this tract, for the PLACE OF BEGINNING, also being a point in the southeast right-of-way line of a 15' alley; THENCE North 46°56’41” West, a distance of 16.05 feet along the common line between this tract and said 15’ alley to a calculated west corner of this tract; THENCE North 63°52’59” East, a distance of 172.57 feet severing said Quinn tract to a calculated north corner of this tract, also being a point in the southwest right-of-way line of South Dexter Drive (50’ R.O.W.), from which a 1/2" iron rod found with yellow plastic cap marked unreadable bears N 20°01'21" W, a distance of 50.06 feet for reference; THENCE around a curve to the right having a delta angle of 01°25’14”, an arc distance of 15.19 feet, a radius of 612.75 feet, and a chord of South 16°58’15” East, a distance of 15.19 feet along the common line between this tract and said South Dexter Drive to a calculated east corner of this tract, from which Monument 220 bears S 60°05'03" E, a distance of 2202.68 feet for reference; THENCE South 63°52’59” West, a distance of 164.45 feet severing said Quinn tract to the PLACE OF BEGINNING containing 0.0580 acres. Page 85 of 344 Adam Wallace Texas Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 6132 - FIRM #101784-00 22 - 04613 - S Dexter Dr - 800-802-alley exhibit-LEGAL—8/19/2022 Page 86 of 344 Page 87 of 344 Page 88 of 344 Page 89 of 344 Page 90 of 344 Page 91 of 344 802 S Dexter Dr, College Station, TX 77840Page 92 of 344 Page 93 of 344 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION Being a tract of land containing 0.0580 acres, being a portion of a 15' alley, adjoining Lots 5, 6 and 7, Block 1 of Southeast College Park Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, as plat recorded in Vol. 119, Page 563, of the Brazos County Official Records (B.C.O.R.), also being a portion of the tract recorded in Vol. 10610, Page 89 of the B.C.O.R. All bearings of this survey are referenced to the Texas State Plane Coordinate System, Central Zone, NAD83(2011) Epoch 2010, and boundary referenced to 1/2” iron rods and 1/2" iron pipe found and referred to in the previously recorded plat, and as surveyed on the ground on August 19th of 2022. This description is also referred to the plat prepared by ATM Surveying, Project No. 2022-04613, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a 1/2" iron pipe found for the south corner of the Scott C. Quinn and Glenda K. Quinn called parts of Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 1 and part of an alley, as recorded in Vol. 10610, Page 89 of the B.C.O.R., also being the west corner of the Michael D. Macicek and Amber M. Macicek called 0.255 acres, called part of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, as recorded in Vol. 13156, Page 142 of the B.C.O.R., also being a point in the northeast line of the Georgia and John Williams called 1.06 acres, called all of Lot 4 and part of Lots 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 1, as recorded in Vol. 17781, Page 93 of the B.C.O.R. THENCE North 46°56’41” West, a distance of 16.05 feet along the common line between said Macicek tract and said Williams tract to a calculated south corner of this tract, for the PLACE OF BEGINNING, also being a point in the southeast right-of-way line of a 15' alley; THENCE North 46°56’41” West, a distance of 16.05 feet along the common line between this tract and said 15’ alley to a calculated west corner of this tract; THENCE North 63°52’59” East, a distance of 172.57 feet severing said Quinn tract to a calculated north corner of this tract, also being a point in the southwest right-of-way line of South Dexter Drive (50’ R.O.W.), from which a 1/2" iron rod found with yellow plastic cap marked unreadable bears N 20°01'21" W, a distance of 50.06 feet for reference; THENCE around a curve to the right having a delta angle of 01°25’14”, an arc distance of 15.19 feet, a radius of 612.75 feet, and a chord of South 16°58’15” East, a distance of 15.19 feet along the common line between this tract and said South Dexter Drive to a calculated east corner of this tract, from which Monument 220 bears S 60°05'03" E, a distance of 2202.68 feet for reference; THENCE South 63°52’59” West, a distance of 164.45 feet severing said Quinn tract to the PLACE OF BEGINNING containing 0.0580 acres. Page 94 of 344 Adam Wallace Texas Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 6132 - FIRM #101784-00 22 - 04613 - S Dexter Dr - 800-802-alley exhibit-LEGAL—8/19/2022 Page 95 of 344 802 S Dexter Dr, College Station, TX 77840Page 96 of 344 Page 97 of 344 Page 98 of 344 X Public Works Director City of College Station Application for Abandonment of a Public Right-of-Way / Easement Location: 600 Scott and White Dr EXHIBIT NO.4 The undersigned, City staff of the City of College Station, certify that they have carefully considered the Application for Abandonment of the public right-of-way/easement referred to above the standpoint of City of College Station ordinances and with respect to recent and future needs of the City of College Station and see no objection to the requested abandonment from the City’s standpoint. X City Engineer City of College Station X Building Official City of College Station X Zoning Official City of College Station X Fire Marshal City of College Station X Elecrtic Department City of College Station X Water Services Department City of College Station Midtown Reserve Subdivision Phase 200 Page 99 of 344 802 S Dexter Dr, College Station, TX 77840Page 100 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 9.3. Unlimited Potential PDD Rezoning Sponsor: Gabriel Schrum Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A , Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 2.799 acres located at 1115 Anderson Street, generally located at the intersection of Anderson Street and Clement Street, east of Holleman Drive. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request and associated Concept Plan. The rezoning request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and the requested modifications and provided benefits help ensure compatibility with adjacent properties. In addition, the additional landscape being proposed, along with streetscaping will limit any adverse impacts on the adjacent properties. By zoning the property PDD and having the associated Concept Plan, it further illustrates the location and details of the proposed use on the property. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this item at their October 5, 2023 meeting and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. Summary: This request is to change the existing zoning from GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning of MF Multi-Family and associated Concept Plan on approximately 2.799 acres. The applicant is requesting the following modifications to the base zoning of MF: • To reduce the minimum number of dwelling units per acre from the required 12, to 3. • To reduce the parking requirements from one space per bedroom to one space for the first bedroom and then 0.5 space for each additional bedroom. The current requirement for multi- family is 1.5 spaces for one bedroom units and 1.0 space per bedroom for units with two or more bedrooms. The applicant is providing the following community benefits: • Additional landscaping/streetscaping. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the subject as Urban Residential. The Comprehensive Plan generally describes the Urban Residential land use Page 101 of 344 designation as follows: Urban Residential – Areas that are appropriate for a range of high-density multifamily and attached residential development in various forms including townhomes, apartment buildings, mixed-use buildings, and limited non-residential uses that are compatible with the surrounding area The proposed use of the property is defined as a “transition facility for foster youth in this community”; which means the use of this property will not have the same amount of intensity of use as normal multi-family developments. There will be less density overall and a reduced amount of automobile trips as the applicant has explained the users of the property will likely not have vehicles. The proposed lower-density use keeps the nature of this request aligned with the intent of Urban Residential format, while also providing an appropriate service that is intended to directly serve foster youth in the greater community. The property has direct access to Anderson Street with the single proposed driveway aligned with Clement Court. The MF Multi-Family zoning district is a generally appropriate district under the Urban Residential land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The property takes its only access from Anderson Street. The use will have very limited vehicle traffic consisting nearly entirely of foster youth and the employees. The small-scale multi-family use being developed operates as transitional housing, which is compatible with the intention of Urban Residential uses. Adjacent properties are zoned R-4 Multi Family to the north and west, D-Duplex to the east, and GS- General Suburban to the south. The adjacent duplex properties to the east are separated from this property by a channelized creek. Every adjacent property to the proposed request is developed . Overall, the PDD’s land use and requested modifications make this proposed transitional housing development appropriate in the context of the area. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The size and location of the subject property is suitable for the proposed use of the property. The property had one existing building, that has since been demolished. Drives, access, and parking are all proposed and provided for on the associated concept plan. The improvements to be made on the property are in the area noted on the attached concept plan, with the additional landscape/streetscaping being provided. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the proposed uses. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. A traffic impact analysis was not required for the proposed request as the anticipated traffic volume falls below the threshold of 150 trips in the peak hour that would require a TIA to be performed. 5. The marketability of the property: Page 102 of 344 The proposed zoning district is generally marketable in this area. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building areas as well as other site related features. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. This proposed Concept Plan allows for a reduction of the number of required parking spaces Aswell as a reduced density per acre. The applicant has in turn provided additional landscaping and streetscaping as community benefits to help with meritorious modifications requested. This will help mitigate impacts the development may have on the adjacent development and overall context to the area. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD Concept Plans. 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. Purpose, Intent and Community Benefits: The proposed Planned Development District for this property outlines the purpose, intent, and community benefit of the proposed development, which is to provide a low-density multi-family development of transitional housing for foster youth. Base Zoning and Meritorious Modifications: The proposed Planned Development District will have a base zoning of MF Multi-Family. At the time of site plan, the project will need to meet all applicable site development standards and platting requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance for the base zoning district, except where meritorious modifications are granted with the PDD zoning. The applicant is requesting the following modifications: • Reduction to the minimum number of dwelling units to 3 units/acre based on Section 5.2 of the UDO. • Reduction of the parking ratio, one (1) parking space for the first bedroom and 0.5 spaces for each additional bedroom based on Section 7.3.H of the UDO. Page 103 of 344 Community Benefits: The proposed concept plan will increase the landscaping and streetscaping amount by 30% more than what is required. The development will provide an additional 2 points per streetscape segment length along Anderson Street, which will change the "points per streetscape segment length" from 6 to 8 and an additional 10 points per 1,000 sf of disturbed area for the site landscape points, which will change the site landscape points from 30 points to 40 points per 1,000 sf of disturbed area. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3. Background Information 4. Applicant's Supporting Information 5. Rezoning Map 6. Existing Future Land Use Map 7. Concept Plan Page 104 of 344 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2, “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN TO PDD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 2.799 ACRES OF LAND BEING IN THE CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 7, IN COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1115 ANDERSON STREET; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A”, Exhibit “B”, Exhibit “C”, and Exhibit “D” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 105 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. Page 2 of 7 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 26th day of October, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 106 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. Page 3 of 7 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit A – Property Description That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development District: Page 107 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. Page 4 of 7 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Page 108 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. Page 5 of 7 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit B – Zoning Map Page 109 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. Page 6 of 7 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit C – Meritorious Modifications and Community Benefits Purpose, Intent and Community Benefits: The proposed Planned Development District for this property outlines the purpose, intent, and community benefit of the proposed development which is to provide housing and resources for foster youth and those who are aging out of the foster system. Base Zoning and Meritorious Modifications The base zoning of the property shall be MF Multi Family. At the time of site plan, the project will need to meet all applicable site development standards and platting requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance for the base zoning district, except where meritorious modifications are granted with the PDD zoning. The applicant is requesting the following meritorious modification: •Reduction to the minimum number of dwelling units to 3 units/acre based on Section 5.2 of the UDO. •Reduction of the parking ratio, one (1) parking space for the first bedroom and 0.5 spaces for each additional bedroom based on Section 7.3.H of the UDO. Community Benefits: The applicant offers the following as community benefits: •The proposed concept plan will increase the landscaping and streetscaping amount by 30% more than what is required. •The development will provide an additional 2 points per streetscape segment length along Anderson Street, which will change the "points per streetscape segment length" from 6 to 8. •They will also provide an additional 10 points per 1,000 sf of disturbed area for the site landscape points, which will change the site landscape points from 30 points to 40 points per 1,000 sf of disturbed area. Page 110 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. Page 7 of 7 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit D – Concept Plan Page 111 of 344 Page 112 of 344 Page 113 of 344 Page 114 of 344 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: October 5, 2023 Advertised Council Hearing Date: October 26, 2023 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Property owner notices mailed: 27 Contacts in support: None at the time of this report Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Urban Residential R-4 Multi-Family Multi Family South Anderson St (Major Collector) GS- General Suburban Anderson St (Major Collector) East Mixed Residential D- Duplex Duplex Residential West Urban Residential R-4 Multi-Family Multi Family DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Incorporated: May, 1956 Zoning: GS General Suburban (upon annexation) Final Plat: Un-platted Site Development: Currently undeveloped; was previously assisted living facility Page 115 of 344 Name of Project: UNLIMITED POTENTIAL - REZONING (REZ2023-000010) Address: 1115 ANDERSON ST Legal Description: A000701, CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL), TRACT 146, 2.805 ACRES Total Acreage: 2.799 Applicant: SCHULTZ ENGINEERING Property Owner: A HOMEBASE FOR TRANSITIONING F List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. There is demand for a transition facility for foster youth in this community. This zoning change would allow for a low density multi-family facility to accommodate the need. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. The Comprehensive Plan shows this area to be urban residential. This low density multi-family PD is appropriate for this land use How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The current zoning is single family residential which is not compatible with the adjacent land uses, and does not allow for the low density multi-family development. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. Multi-family PD will provide a transition from the more urban adjacent developments to the single-family subdivision. It will also provide a home base for transitioning foster youth. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Multi-family PD will provide a transition from the more urban adjacent developments to the single-family subdivision. It will also provide a home base for transitioning foster youth. REZONING PDD APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 3 Page 116 of 344 Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The current zoning is single family residential which is not compatible with the adjacent land uses, and does not allow for the low density multi-family development. List any other reasons to support this zone change. The community needs a location for a transition facility for foster youth. This rezoning will allow this to happen. Maximum Building Height. Building height will be per multi-family zoning requirements. Proposed Drainage. The proposed stormwater runoff will function similar to today. The proposed impervious cover will be less than or equal to the previous development on this tract. Variations Sought. ā0,1':(//,1*81,76$&5( *5266'(9(/230(17 3 UNITS / ACRE. ā3$5.,1*5$7,221( 1) PARKING SPACE FOR THE FIRST BEDROOM AND 0.5 SPACES FRO EACH ADDITIONAL BEDROOM. Community Benefits. The community needs a location for a transition facility for foster youth. This rezoning will allow this to happen. Sustained Stability. Multi-family PD will provide a transition from the more urban adjacent developments to the single-family subdivision. It will also provide a home base for transitioning foster youth. Page 2 of 3 Page 117 of 344 Conformity. The Comprehensive Plan shows this area to be urban residential. This low density multi-family PD is appropriate for this land use Compatibility with use. This use will transition from the adjacent Multi-family development to the adjacent duplex development. Access to Streets. Access will be to Anderson Street via Driveway. Public Improvements. This development will provide common open space for residents to congregate. Public Health. The development will be constructed in accordance with City of College Station codes and ordinances and will not be detrimental to the public health safety or welfare. Safety. his development will fit with the planned uses for the area and will not be an adverse impact. Page 3 of 3 Page 118 of 344 Page 119 of 344 Page 120 of 344 ANDE R S O N S T R E E T CLEMENT CTHOLIK DR· · · · VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE AN D E R S O N S T R E E T CLEMENT CTPINE RI D GE DR TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: CONCEPT PLAN UNLIMITED POTENTIAL 2.799 ACRES CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE SURVEY, A-7 1115 ANDERSON STREET COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SCALE: AS SHOWN AUGUST 2023 OWNER: A Homebase for Transitioning Foster Youth, Inc. 3708 E 29th St. Bryan, TX 77802 DEVELOPER: Unlimited Potential, Inc. 3708 E 29th St. Bryan, TX 77802 SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 KERR JOB # 23-155 Page 121 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 9.4. City-Initiated Rezonings to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay (1 of 2) Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries as follows: a. From MH Middle Housing or R-4 Multi-Family to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay or R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 2.85 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 10-19, generally located along Cooner Street; b. From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 4.6 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 20-30, and Block 5, Lots 1-8, generally located along Cooner Street; c. From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 5.4 acres being College Vista, Block E, Lots 1-14, Block F, Lots 1- 10, Block G, Lots 1-5, Block H, Lots 1-3, 4R-5R, and 6-7, generally located along Live Oak Street and Ash Street; d. From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 5.11 acres being University Oaks Phase 2, Block 5, Lots 1-13, 14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21-23, 24A1-24A2, and 25R, generally located along Dominik Drive; e. From MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 4.66 acres being Little-Knight Addition, Lots 1-18, generally located along Aurora Court, and; f. From GS General Suburban or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 23.62 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Joseph E. Scott League, Abstract No. 50, and Crawford Burnett League, Abstract No. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including all of the W.M. Sparks Subdivision as described by plat recorded in Volume 139, Page 261, and portions of West Park Addition and West Park 2nd Addition as described by plats recorded in Volume 102, Page 198 and Volume 128, Page 574, respectively, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, as well as subsequent replats of portions of these subdivisions in an area generally bounded by Luther Street, Montclair Avenue, Grove Street, and Maryem Street. Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity • Diverse & Growing Economy Page 122 of 344 Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this item at their October 5, 2023 meeting and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. Summary: At the August 10 City Council meeting, City staff presented each of these areas along with the feedback staff received during the public engagement process. At the meeting, the City Council gave direction for staff to move forward with bringing these areas as official rezoning cases. After considering the rezoning criteria, City staff has determined that each of these areas are appropriate for rezoning to MH Middle Housing with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay, or R-4 Multi- Family with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. The HOO High Occupancy Overlay would allow the shared housing use as long as the property met the requirements for that use. This item combines several City-initiated rezoning cases to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay. These requests include areas where at least one lot is already zoned MH Middle Housing, which was previously done through a privately initiated request. These areas need to be considered separately and before the ordinance amendment to remove shared housing as a permitted use from MH Middle Housing. The other City-initiated rezoning cases will be considered under separate actions. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Area B1, Area B2, and Area D Supporting Materials 3. Area F-G-H Supporting Materials 4. Area J Supporting Materials 5. Area Y Supporting Materials 6. Area 1 Map 7. Area 2 Map 8. Area 3 Map Page 123 of 344 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2 “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AS FOLLOWS: A. FROM MH MIDDLE HOUSING OR R-4 MULTI-FAMILY TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY OR R-4 MULTI-FAMILY AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 2.85 ACRES BEING THE COONER ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOTS 10-19, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG COONER STREET; B. FROM D DUPLEX OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.6 ACRES BEING THE COONER ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOTS 20-30, BLOCK 5, LOTS 1-8, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG COONER STREET; C. FROM D DUPLEX OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.4 ACRES BEING COLLEGE VISTA, BLOCK E, LOTS 1-14, BLOCK F, LOTS 1-10, BLOCK G, LOTS 1-5, BLOCK H LOTS 1-3, 4R-5R, AND 6-7, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG LIVE OAK STREET AND ASH STREET; D. FROM D DUPLEX OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.11 ACRES BEING UNIVERSITY OAKS PHASE 2, BLOCK 5, LOTS 1-13, 14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21-23, 24A1-24A2, AND 25R, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG DOMINIK DRIVE; E. FROM MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.66 ACRES BEING LITTLE-KNIGHT ADDITION, LOTS 1-18, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG AURORA COURT, AND; F. FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 23.62 ACRES BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE JOSEPH E. SCOTT LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 50, AND CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 7, IN COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, INCLUDING ALL OF THE W.M. SPARKS SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED BY PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 139, PAGE 261, AND PORTIONS OF WEST PARK ADDITION AND WEST PARK 2ND ADDITION AS DESCRIBED BY PLATS RECORDED IN VOLUME 102, PAGE 198 AND VOLUME 128, PAGE 574, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AS WELL AS SUBSEQUENT REPLATS OF PORTIONS OF THESE SUBDIVISIONS IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY LUTHER STREET, MONTCLAIR AVENUE, GROVE STREET, AND MARYEM STREET; Page 124 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 2 of 9 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1:That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A,” Exhibit “B,” Exhibit “C,” Exhibit “D,” Exhibit “E,” and Exhibit “F” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2:If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3:That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4:This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 125 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 3 of 9 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 26th day of October, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: _____________________________ _____________________________ City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney Page 126 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 4 of 9 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit A That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from MH Middle Housing or R-4 Multi-Family to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay or R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 10-19 (R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Lots 10, 12 and 17-19) (MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Lots 11 and 13-16) Page 127 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 5 of 9 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit B That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 20-30, Block 5, Lots 1-8 Page 128 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 6 of 9 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit C That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: College Vista, Block E, Lots 1-14, Block F, Lots 1-10, Block G, Lots 1-5, and Block H, Lots 1-3, 4R-5R, and 6-7 Page 129 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 7 of 9 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit D That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: University Oaks Phase 2, Block 5, Lots 1-13, 14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21- 23, 24A1-24A2, and 25R Page 130 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 8 of 9 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit E That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Little-Knight Addition, Lots 1-18 Page 131 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 9 of 9 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit F That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Approximately 23.62 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Joseph E. Scott League, Abstract No. 50, and Crawford Burnett League, Abstract No. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including all of the W.M. Sparks Subdivision as described by plat recorded in Volume 139, Page 261, and portions of West Park Addition and West Park 2nd Addition as described by plats recorded in Volume 102, Page 198 And Volume 128, Page 574, respectively, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, as well as subsequent replats of portions of these subdivisions in an area generally bounded by Luther Street, Montclair Avenue, Grove Street, and Maryem Street. Page 132 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA B1, AREA B2, AND AREA D    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential and are within the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Area. For the  Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     Area B1 is surrounded by single family homes in the City of Bryan to the north, and duplexes to  the east, south and west. Area B2 is surrounded by single family homes in the City of Bryan to the  north, duplexes to the west and commercial properties to the east and south. Area D is  surrounded by single‐family homes to the north, east and west and single‐family homes and a  multi‐family development to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as new  generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station;  allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in  the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an  appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses  permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for  additional residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the  surrounding areas.    Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was  determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.          Page 133 of 344 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 134 of 344 Page 135 of 344 Page 136 of 344 Page 137 of 344 Page 138 of 344 Page 139 of 344 Page 140 of 344 Page 141 of 344 Page 142 of 344 Page 143 of 344 Page 144 of 344 Page 145 of 344 Page 146 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA F‐G‐H    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject property is surrounded by single‐family homes to the north and multi‐family  developments to the south across Dominik Drive. Development pressure continues to grow as  new generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station;  allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in  the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an  appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses  permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for  additional residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the  surrounding areas.    Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was  determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    Page 147 of 344 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 148 of 344 Page 149 of 344 Page 150 of 344 Page 151 of 344 Page 152 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA J    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject properties are surrounded by A&M Consolidated Middle School to the north, multi‐ family developments to the east, Grace Bible Church to the south, and single‐family homes to the  west. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young  professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging  redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. All of the  properties in this area have already been zoned to MH Middle Housing. This request is to apply  the HOO High Occupancy Overlay to these properties as well, to allow shared housing uses. This  was determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.          Page 153 of 344 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 154 of 344 Page 155 of 344 Page 156 of 344 Page 157 of 344 Page 158 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA Y    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential and are part of the George Bush Drive & Wellborn Road (FM 2154)  Redevelopment Area. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the  following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:    The subject properties are surrounded by single‐family homes to the north, east, and west, with  the Lincoln Recreation Center complex to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as  new generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station;  allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in  the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an  appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses  permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for  additional residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the  surrounding areas.    Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was  determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.  Page 159 of 344 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 160 of 344 Page 161 of 344 Page 162 of 344 Page 163 of 344 Page 164 of 344 Page 165 of 344 Page 166 of 344 Page 167 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 9.5. Shared Housing Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Section 6.3 “Types of Use” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, for modifications to the shared housing use in the MH Middle Housing zoning district. Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity • Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this item at their October 5, 2023 meeting and recommended approval 5-0. Summary: At the September 14, 2023 City Council meeting, staff gave a presentation on the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which the City Council adopted. The intent behind establishing the HOO High Occupancy Overlay and removing the shared housing use from MH Middle Housing was to better define where shared housing uses could go. Now that the HOO High Occupancy Overlay has been established, the next step is to only allow a shared housing use in the MH Middle Housing zoning district when a HOO High Occupancy Overaly exists. Shared housing is also allowed in areas that are zoned with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay, are zoned multi-family, or are zoned with a Northgate district. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Section 6.3 Types of Use redlines Page 168 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 6.3 “TYPES OF USE” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, TO MODIFY WHICH ZONING DISTRICTS A SHARED HOUSING USE CAN LOCATE IN; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1:That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 6.3 “Types of Use” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2:If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3:That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4:This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 169 of 344 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 26th day of October, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: _____________________________ _____________________________ City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney Page 170 of 344 Exhibit A That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 6.3 “Types of Use” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 6.3. Types of Use. A. Uses of land or structures which are not expressly listed in the Use Table as permitted uses (P), permitted uses subject to specific use standards (P*), or conditional uses (C) in a zoning district or planned development are prohibited uses and shall not be established in that district or planned development. B. The Administrator shall determine whether or not an unlisted use, that is otherwise prohibited, as stated above should be processed. In doing so, the Administrator shall utilize purpose statements adopted herein in conjunction with the applicable zoning district, and consideration of the following criteria: 1. The actual or anticipated characteristics of the activity based on known characteristics of similar projects in standard planning practice; 2. The relative amount of site area, floor space, and equipment; 3. Relative volumes of sales from each activity; 4. The customer type for each activity; 5. The relative number of employees in each activity; 6. Hours of operation; 7. Building and site arrangement; 8. Vehicles used with the activity and the relative number of vehicle trips generated by the use; and 9. How the use advertises itself. C.Use Table. Except where otherwise specifically provided herein, regulations governing the use of land and structures with the various zoning districts and classifications of planned developments are hereby established as shown in the following Use Table. 1.Permitted Uses. A "P" indicates that a use is allowed by right in the respective district. Such uses are subject to all other applicable regulations of this UDO. 2.Permitted Uses Subject to Specific Standards. A "P*" indicates a use that will be permitted, provided that the use meets the provisions in the Specific Use Standards Section below. Such uses are also subject to all other applicable regulations of this UDO. 3.Conditional Uses. A "C" indicates a use that is allowed only where a conditional use permit is approved by the City Council. The Council may require that the use meet the additional standards enumerated in the Specific Use Standards Section below. Conditional uses are subject to all other applicable regulations of this UDO. Page 171 of 344 USE TABLE Specific Uses RWEEWRSRSGST **D **MHMF **MU **MHP **P-MUD **OSC **WCGCCIBP **BPICUNAPR-1BR-4 **R-6 **C-3 **M-1M-2R&D **WPC **NG-1 **NG-2 **NG-3 **HOO **KEY: P = Permitted by Right P* = Permitted Subject to Specific Use Standards C = Conditional Use ** = District with Supplemental Standards (refer to Article 5, District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards) RESIDENTIAL USES Assisted Living/Residential Care Facility P P P Boarding and Rooming House P P P P P Courtyard House P * Dormitory P P P P P P P P Duplex P P P P P Extended Care Facility/Convalescent/ Nursing Home P P P P P P P P Fraternity/Sorority P P P P P P Manufactured Home P * P * P * Mixed-Use Structure P P P P P P P Multi-Family P P P P P C (a ) P P P Multi-Family built prior to January 2002 P P P P P P P P Multiplex, Medium P P Multiplex, Small P P Shared Housing P (d ) P P (d ) P (d ) P (d ) P (d ) P (d ) P P P P Single-Family Detached P P P P P P P P P P P Single-Unit Dwelling P Split-Lot Duplex P P Townhouse P P P P P P P Two-Unit Dwelling P Live-Work Unit P * P * P * PUBLIC, CIVIC, AND INSTITUTIONAL USES Educational Facility, College and University P Educational Facility, Indoor Instruction P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Educational Facility, Outdoor Instruction P C C P P P P Educational Facility, Primary and Secondary P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Page 172 of 344 Educational Facility, Tutoring P P P P P P P P P P P P P Educational Facility, Vocational/Trade P P P P P P P P Governmental Facilities P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P *P P P * P *P P P P P P * P * P *P P P P P P P P * Health Care, Hospitals P P Health Care, Medical Clinics P P P P P P P P P P Parks P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Places of Worship P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P *P P P P *P P P P P P * P * P *P P P P P P P P COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, AND RETAIL USES Agricultural Use, Barn or Stable for Private Stock P P P Agricultural Use, Farm or Pasturage P P P Agricultural Use, Farm Product Processing P Animal Care Facility, Indoor P P P P P P P P P P P P Animal Care Facility, Outdoor P *P Art Studio/Gallery P (c ) P P P P P P P P P P P P Car Wash P * Commercial Garden, Greenhouse, or Landscape Maintenance P * P * P * P * P * P * Commercial Amusement P P P C C P * P *C P P P Conference/Conventio n Center P P P P P P P P Country Club P P P P P P P P P P Day Care, Commercial P (c ) P P C P P P P P C C P P P P Drive-In/Thru P *P C P * Dry Cleaners and Laundry P P P * P *P P *P P P * P * P * P * P * Fraternal Lodge P P P P P P Fuel Sales P * P * P *P Funeral Home P P P P Golf Course or Driving Range P * P * P * P * Health Club/Sports Facility, Indoor P P P P P P P P P P P P Page 173 of 344 Health Club/Sports Facility, Outdoor P P *P P P P P *P Hotel C (b ) P P P P P P P P Mobile Food Court C C C C C C C Night Club, Bar, or Tavern C C C C C P P Office P (c ) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Parking as a Primary Use P P C P P P P * Personal Service Shop P (c ) P P P P P P P P P P P P Printing/Copy Shop P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Radio/TV Station/Studio P P P P P P P P P P P P * Recreational Vehicle Park C C Restaurant P P P P * P *P P *P P P P * Retail Sales - Single Tenant over 50,000 SF P P P Retail Sales and Service P (c ) P P P P * P * P * P *P P P P P Retail Sales and Service - Alcohol C P P * P *P C P P Sexually Oriented Business P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * Shooting Range, Indoor P P P P P Theater P P P P P P P P Retail Sales, Manufactured Homes P P * Storage, Self Service P * P *P P P P *P Vehicular Sales, Rental, Repair, and Service P * P *P P * Wholesales/Services P * P *P P P P INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING USES Storage Tank/Cold Storage Plant P P P Micro-Industrial P * P *P P * P * Industrial, Light P P P P P P Industrial, Heavy P P Recycling Facility - Large P *P P Page 174 of 344 Salvage Yard P * P * Scientific Testing/Research Laboratory P P P P P Storage, Outdoor - Equipment or Materials P P *P P P Truck Stop/Freight or Trucking Terminal P P Utility P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * Warehousing/Distribu tion P C P P P Waste Services P P Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Intermediate P * P * P * P * P * P *P P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Major C P *C C C C P C C C P *C Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Unregulated P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Notes: (a) Multi-family residential uses located in stories or floors above retail commercial uses are permitted by right. (b) Hotels are only allowed when accessory to a country club development and are limited to a maximum of fifteen (15) rooms. (c) Permitted in live-work units only. (d) Permitted only when there is also a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. Page 175 of 344 Page 176 of 344 Sec. 6.3. Types of Use. A. Uses of land or structures which are not expressly listed in the Use Table as permitted uses (P), permitted uses subject to specific use standards (P*), or conditional uses (C) in a zoning district or planned development are prohibited uses and shall not be established in that district or planned development. B. The Administrator shall determine whether or not an unlisted use, that is otherwise prohibited, as stated above should be processed. In doing so, the Administrator shall utilize purpose statements adopted herein in conjunction with the applicable zoning district, and consideration of the following criteria: 1. The actual or anticipated characteristics of the activity based on known characteristics of similar projects in standard planning practice; 2. The relative amount of site area, floor space, and equipment; 3. Relative volumes of sales from each activity; 4. The customer type for each activity; 5. The relative number of employees in each activity; 6. Hours of operation; 7. Building and site arrangement; 8. Vehicles used with the activity and the relative number of vehicle trips generated by the use; and 9. How the use advertises itself. C. Use Table. Except where otherwise specifically provided herein, regulations governing the use of land and structures with the various zoning districts and classifications of planned developments are hereby established as shown in the following Use Table. 1. Permitted Uses. A "P" indicates that a use is allowed by right in the respective district. Such uses are subject to all other applicable regulations of this UDO. 2. Permitted Uses Subject to Specific Standards. A "P*" indicates a use that will be permitted, provided that the use meets the provisions in the Specific Use Standards Section below. Such uses are also subject to all other applicable regulations of this UDO. 3. Conditional Uses. A "C" indicates a use that is allowed only where a conditional use permit is approved by the City Council. The Council may require that the use meet the additional standards enumerated in the Specific Use Standards Section below. Conditional uses are subject to all other applicable regulations of this UDO. Page 177 of 344 USE TABLE Specific Uses R WE E WRS RS GS T ** D ** MH MF ** MU ** MHP ** P-MUD ** O SC ** WC GC CI BP ** BPI CU NAP R-1B R-4 ** R-6 ** C-3 ** M-1 M-2 R&D ** WPC ** NG-1 ** NG-2 ** NG-3 ** HOO ** KEY: P = Permitted by Right P* = Permitted Subject to Specific Use Standards C = Conditional Use ** = District with Supplemental Standards (refer to Article 5, District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards) RESIDENTIAL USES Assisted Living/Residential Care Facility P P P Boarding and Rooming House P P P P P Courtyard House P* Dormitory P P P P P P P P Duplex P P P P P Extended Care Facility/Convalescent /Nursing Home P P P P P P P P Fraternity/Sorority P P P P P P Manufactured Home P * P * P * Mixed-Use Structure P P P P P P P Multi-Family P P P P P C (a) P P P Multi-Family built prior to January 2002 P P P P P P P P Multiplex, Medium P P Multiplex, Small P P Shared Housing P( d) P P( d) P( d) P( d) P( d) P( d) P P P P Single-Family Detached P P P P P P P P P P P Single-Unit Dwelling P Split-Lot Duplex P P Townhouse P P P P P P P Two-Unit Dwelling P Live-Work Unit P* P * P * PUBLIC, CIVIC, AND INSTITUTIONAL USES Educational Facility, College and University P Educational Facility, Indoor Instruction P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Educational Facility, Outdoor Instruction P C C P P P P Educational Facility, Primary and Secondary P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Educational Facility, Tutoring P P P P P P P P P P P P P Page 178 of 344 Educational Facility, Vocational/Trade P P P P P P P P Governmental Facilities P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P* P * P* P * P P P * P * P P P P P P * P* P* P P P P P P P P * Health Care, Hospitals P P Health Care, Medical Clinics P P P P P P P P P P Parks P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Places of Worship P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P* P * P* P * P P P P * P P P P P P * P* P* P P P P P P P P COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, AND RETAIL USES Agricultural Use, Barn or Stable for Private Stock P P P Agricultural Use, Farm or Pasturage P P P Agricultural Use, Farm Product Processing P Animal Care Facility, Indoor P P P P P P P P P P P P Animal Care Facility, Outdoor P * P Art Studio/Gallery P (c) P P P P P P P P P P P P Car Wash P * Commercial Garden, Greenhouse, or Landscape Maintenance P * P * P * P * P * P * Commercial Amusement P P P C C P * P * C P P P Conference/Conventi on Center P P P P P P P P Country Club P P P P P P P P P P Day Care, Commercial P (c) P P C P P P P P C C P P P P Drive-In/Thru P * P C P * Dry Cleaners and Laundry P P P* P * P P * P P P * P* P * P * P * Fraternal Lodge P P P P P P Fuel Sales P* P * P * P Funeral Home P P P P Golf Course or Driving Range P * P* P * P * Health Club/Sports Facility, Indoor P P P P P P P P P P P P Health Club/Sports Facility, Outdoor P P* P P P P P * P Page 179 of 344 Hotel C (b ) P P P P P P P P Mobile Food Court C C C C C C C Night Club, Bar, or Tavern C C C C C P P Office P (c) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Parking as a Primary Use P P C P P P P * Personal Service Shop P (c) P P P P P P P P P P P P Printing/Copy Shop P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Radio/TV Station/Studio P P P P P P P P P P P P * Recreational Vehicle Park C C Restaurant P P P P * P * P P * P P P P * Retail Sales - Single Tenant over 50,000 SF P P P Retail Sales and Service P (c) P P P P * P * P * P * P P P P P Retail Sales and Service - Alcohol C P P * P * P C P P Sexually Oriented Business P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P* P * P* P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P* P* P * P * P * P * P* P * P * P * Shooting Range, Indoor P P P P P Theater P P P P P P P P Retail Sales, Manufactured Homes P P * Storage, Self Service P * P * P P P P * P Vehicular Sales, Rental, Repair, and Service P * P * P P * Wholesales/Services P * P * P P P P INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING USES Storage Tank/Cold Storage Plant P P P Micro-Industrial P * P * P P * P * Industrial, Light P P P P P P Industrial, Heavy P P Recycling Facility - Large P * P P Salvage Yard P * P * Page 180 of 344 Scientific Testing/Research Laboratory P P P P P Storage, Outdoor - Equipment or Materials P P * P P P Truck Stop/Freight or Trucking Terminal P P Utility P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P* P * P* P * P* P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P * P* P* P * P * P * P * P* P * P * P * Warehousing/Distrib ution P C P P P Waste Services P P Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Intermediate P * P* P * P * P * P * P P * P * P * P * P * P* P * P * P * Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Major C P* C C C C P C C C P * C Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Unregulated P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Notes: (a) Multi-family residential uses located in stories or floors above retail commercial uses are permitted by right. (b) Hotels are only allowed when accessory to a country club development and are limited to a maximum of fifteen (15) rooms. (c) Permitted in live-work units only. (d) Permitted only when there is also a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. Page 181 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 9.6. City-Initiated Rezonings to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay (2 of 2) Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries as follows: a. From GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 2.02 acres being Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lots 1-16 and 17R, generally located along Lincoln Avenue; b. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 4.12 acres being Timber Ridge Addition Phase 1, Block 2, Lots 13-24, Block 3, Lots 12-22, generally located along University Oaks Boulevard; c. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 6.71 acres being Parkway Plaza Phase 5, Block 1, Lots 1-15, Block 2, Lots 1-12, generally located along Pine Ridge Drive; d. From GS General Suburban or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 19.34 acres being Autumn Chase, Block 1, Lots 1-7, Brentwood Section Two, Block 4, Lots 1-30, Block 5, Lots 1-23, Block 6, Lots 1-4, and Brentwood Section Three Subdivision, generally located along Cornell Drive, Brentwood Drive, and Southwest Parkway; e. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 5.8 acres being Ashford Square Subdivision Replat, Volume 3202, Page 61, generally located along Ashford Drive; f. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 8.15 acres being Pecan Tree Estates Phase One Subdivision and Pecan Tree Estates Phase Two Subdivision, save and except 0.687 acres labeled "Park," generally located along Oney Hervey Drive; g. From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 28.4 acres being University Heights Phase 1 Subdivision, save and except Common Area 4, and University Heights Phase 2 and 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Paloma Ridge Drive, Feather Run, Davidson Drive, and Holleman Drive South; h. From R Rural to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 8.8 acres being Las Palomas Subdivision, generally bounded by Abbate Road, Feather Run, Kenyon Drive, and Holleman Drive South; i. From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 12.85 acres being The Barracks II Phase 111 Subdivision, and The Barracks II Phase 112, Block 38, Lots 1-24, Block 39, Lots 1-10, Common Area 13 and Parkland 12, generally bounded by Towers Parkway, Goldilocks Lane, and Cain Road; j. From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 18.83 acres being Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 Subdivision, Volume 14370, Page 182 of 344 Page 149, and Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 2A Subdivision, generally bounded by Deacon Drive West, Towers Parkway, Oak Crest, and Holleman Drive South, and; k. From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 55.49 acres being The Barracks Phase 1 Subdivision, The Barracks Phase 2 Subdivision, Williamsgate Phase 1 Subdivision, Buena Vida Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 1 Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 2 Subdivision, and 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Rock Prairie Road West, Towers Parkway, Deacon Drive West, and General Parkway. Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity • Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item at their October 5, 2023 meeting and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. Summary: At the August 10 City Council meeting, City staff presented each of these areas along with the feedback staff received during the public engagement process. At the meeting, the City Council gave direction for staff to move forward with bringing these areas as official rezoning cases. After considering the rezoning criteria, City staff has determined that each of these areas are appropriate for rezoning to MH Middle Housing with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. The HOO High Occupancy Overlay would allow the shared housing use as long as the property met the requirements for that use. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Area E Supporting Materials 3. Area I Supporting Materials 4. Area M Supporting Materials 5. Area P-Q-R-S-T Supporting Materials 6. Area W Supporting Materials 7. Area Z Supporting Materials 8. Area HH and Area II Supporting Materials 9. Area JJ-KK, Area LL, and Area MM Supporting Materials 10. Area 1 Map 11. Area 2 Map 12. Area 3 Map 13. Area 5 Map Page 183 of 344 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2 “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AS FOLLOWS: A. FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 2.02 ACRES BEING LINCOLN PLACE PHASE 2, BLOCK C, LOTS 1-16 AND 17R, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG LINCOLN AVENUE; B. FROM D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.12 ACRES BEING TIMBER RIDGE ADDITION PHASE 1, BLOCK 2, LOTS 13-24, BLOCK 3, LOTS 12-22, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG UNIVERSITY OAKS BOULEVARD; C. FROM D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 6.71 ACRES BEING PARKWAY PLAZA PHASE 5, BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-15, BLOCK 2, LOTS 1-12, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG PINE RIDGE DRIVE; D. FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN OR D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 19.34 ACRES BEING AUTUMN CHASE, BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-7, BRENTWOOD SECTION TWO, BLOCK 4, LOTS 1-30, BLOCK 5, LOTS 1-23, BLOCK 6, LOTS 1-4, AND BRENTWOOD SECTION THREE SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG CORNELL DRIVE, BRENTWOOD DRIVE, AND SOUTHWEST PARKWAY; E. FROM D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.8 ACRES BEING ASHFORD SQUARE SUBDIVISION REPLAT, VOLUME 3202, PAGE 61, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG ASHFORD DRIVE; F. FROM D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 8.15 ACRES BEING PECAN TREE ESTATES PHASE ONE SUBDIVISION AND PECAN TREE ESTATES PHASE TWO SUBDIVISION, SAVE AND EXCEPT 0.687 ACRES LABELED "PARK," GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG ONEY HERVEY DRIVE; G. FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN OR T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 28.4 ACRES BEING UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION, SAVE AND EXCEPT COMMON AREA 4, AND UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS PHASE 2 AND 3 SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY PALOMA RIDGE DRIVE, FEATHER RUN, DAVIDSON DRIVE, AND HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTH; H. FROM R RURAL TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 8.8 ACRES BEING LAS PALOMAS SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY ABBATE ROAD, FEATHER RUN, KENYON DRIVE, AND HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTH; Page 184 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 2 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 I. FROM T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 12.85 ACRES BEING THE BARRACKS II PHASE 111 SUBDIVISION, AND THE BARRACKS II PHASE 112, BLOCK 38, LOTS 1-24, BLOCK 39, LOTS 1-10, COMMON AREA 13 AND PARKLAND 12, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY TOWERS PARKWAY, GOLDILOCKS LANE, AND CAIN ROAD; J. FROM T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.83 ACRES BEING PERSHING POINTE VILLAS PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION, VOLUME 14370, PAGE 149, AND PERSHING POINTE VILLAS PHASE 2A SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY DEACON DRIVE WEST, TOWERS PARKWAY, OAK CREST, AND HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTH, AND; K. FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN OR T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 55.49 ACRES BEING THE BARRACKS PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION, THE BARRACKS PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION, WILLIAMSGATE PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION, BUENA VIDA SUBDIVISION, 12 AT ROCK PRAIRIE PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION, 12 AT ROCK PRAIRIE PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION, AND 12 AT ROCK PRAIRIE PHASE 3 SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD W, TOWERS PARKWAY, DEACON DRIVE W, AND GENERAL PARKWAY; CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1:That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A,” Exhibit “B,” Exhibit “C,” Exhibit “D,” Exhibit “E,” Exhibit “F,” Exhibit “G,” Exhibit “H,” Exhibit “I,” Exhibit “J,” and Exhibit “K” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2:If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3:That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Page 185 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 3 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4:This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 26th day of October, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: _____________________________ _____________________________ City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney Page 186 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 4 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit A That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lots 1-16 and 17R Page 187 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 5 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit B That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Timber Ridge Addition Phase 1, Block 2, Lots 13-24, Block 3, Lots 12-22 Page 188 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 6 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit C That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Parkway Plaza Phase 5, Block 1, Lots 1-15, Block 2, Lots 1-12 Page 189 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 7 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit D That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from GS General Suburban or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Autumn Chase, Block 1, Lots 1-7, Brentwood Section Two, Block 4, Lots 1-30, Block 5, Lots 1-23, Block 6, Lots 1-4, and Brentwood Section Three Subdivision Page 190 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 8 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit E That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Ashford Square Subdivision Replat, Volume 3202, Page 61 Page 191 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 9 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit F That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Pecan Tree Estates Phase One Subdivision and Pecan Tree Estates Phase Two Subdivision, save and except 0.687 acres labeled "Park" Page 192 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 10 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit G That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: University Heights Phase 1 Subdivision, save and except Common Area 4, and University Heights Phase 2 and 3 Subdivision Page 193 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 11 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit H That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from R Rural to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Las Palomas Subdivision Page 194 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 12 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit I That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: The Barracks II Phase 111 Subdivision, and The Barracks II Phase 112, Block 38, Lots 1- 24, Block 39, Lots 1-10, Common Area 13 and Parkland 12 Page 195 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 13 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit J That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 Subdivision, Volume 14370, Page 149, and Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 2A Subdivision Page 196 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 14 of 14 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit K That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: The Barracks Phase 1 Subdivision, The Barracks Phase 2 Subdivision, Williamsgate Phase 1 Subdivision, Buena Vida Subdivision, 12 At Rock Prairie Phase 1 Subdivision, 12 At Rock Prairie Phase 2 Subdivision, and 12 At Rock Prairie Phase 3 Subdivision Page 197 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA E    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject property is surrounded by duplexes to the north, single‐family homes to the west and  south and undeveloped property to the east. Development pressure continues to grow as new  generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station;  allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in  the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an  appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses  permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for  additional residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the  surrounding areas.    Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was  determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    Page 198 of 344 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 199 of 344 Page 200 of 344 Page 201 of 344 Page 202 of 344 Page 203 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA I    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject property is surrounded by single‐family homes to the north, west, and east, and multi‐ family developments to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations  of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and  encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The  MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale,  permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the  MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional  residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding  areas.    Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was  determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    Page 204 of 344 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 205 of 344 Page 206 of 344 Page 207 of 344 Page 208 of 344 Page 209 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA M    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject properties are generally surrounded by multi‐family developments on all sides.  Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young professionals,  families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging redevelopment  opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning  district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the increase in  residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning  district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to meet market  demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.    Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was  determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    Page 210 of 344 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 211 of 344 Page 212 of 344 Page 213 of 344 Page 214 of 344 Page 215 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA P‐Q‐R‐S‐T    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:    The subject property is surrounded by single‐family homes and multi‐family apartments to the  north and more multi‐family to the west. Commercial developments are to the south and across  Southwest Parkway to the east. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of  students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and  encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The  MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale,  permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the  MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional  residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding  areas. Given the higher density multi‐family and commercial products, the increased density fits  well into this area.    Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was  determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.            Page 216 of 344 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 217 of 344 Page 218 of 344 Page 219 of 344 Page 220 of 344 Page 221 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA W    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject property is surrounded by office and commercial areas to the north, west and south.  Multi‐family apartments are to the northeast and a manufactured park is to the southeast.   Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young professionals,  families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging redevelopment  opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning  district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the increase in  residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning  district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to meet market  demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.    Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was  determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    Page 222 of 344 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 223 of 344 Page 224 of 344 Page 225 of 344 Page 226 of 344 Page 227 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA Z    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject property is surrounded by single‐family homes to the north and east, a multi‐family  development to the south, and a commercial development and single‐family homes to the west.  Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young professionals,  families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging redevelopment  opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning  district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the increase in  residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning  district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to meet market  demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.    Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was  determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.  Page 228 of 344 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 229 of 344 Page 230 of 344 Page 231 of 344 Page 232 of 344 Page 233 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA HH AND AREA II    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject properties are surrounded by single‐family homes, townhomes and commercial  development to the north, townhomes and vacant property to the east, townhomes, commercial  development and vacant property to the south and vacant property to the west. Development  pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young professionals, families, and  seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps  alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables  redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density  on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are  appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to meet market demand,  while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.    Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was  determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.  Page 234 of 344 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 235 of 344 Page 236 of 344 Page 237 of 344 Page 238 of 344 Page 239 of 344 Page 240 of 344 Page 241 of 344 Page 242 of 344 Page 243 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA JJ‐KK, AREA LL, AND AREA MM    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject property is surrounded by townhomes to the north, east, and west and commercial  development to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of  students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and  encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The  MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale,  permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the  MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional  residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding  areas.    Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was  determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M  University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of  the properties within the area.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    Page 244 of 344 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an  increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 245 of 344 Page 246 of 344 Page 247 of 344 Page 248 of 344 Page 249 of 344 Page 250 of 344 Page 251 of 344 Page 252 of 344 Page 253 of 344 Page 254 of 344 Page 255 of 344 Page 256 of 344 Page 257 of 344 Page 258 of 344 Page 259 of 344 Page 260 of 344 Page 261 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 9.7. City-Initiated Rezonings to MH Middle Housing Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries as follows: a. From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 15.5 acres being The Dobrovolny Subdivision and Holleman Ridge Subdivision, generally bounded by Anderson Street, Holleman Drive, and Charles Court; b. From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 9.73 acres being Lemon Tree Addition, Block 1, Lots 1-11, Block 2, Lot 1, Block 3, Lots 1-11, and Parkway Plaza Phase 4, Block 3, Lots 1-14, Block 4, Lots 1-9, generally bounded by Anderson Street, Cedar Run, and Lemon Tree Lane; c. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 7.03 acres being Brentwood Section Five, Block 1, Lots 1-16 and Block 4, Lots 1-11, generally located along Colgate Circle and Stanford Circle; d. From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 6.85 acres being Eastmark Phase II, Block E, Lots 1R-5R and Lots 16-40, generally located along Kalanchoe Court, Camelia Court, and Azalea Court; e. From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 7.4 acres being Krenek Crossing Subdivision, Volume 6187, Page 138, generally located along Nelson Lane, Thornton Court, and Camp Court; f. From GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing for approximately 3.87 acres being Chalet Village Subdivision, Volume 420, Page 91, generally located along Swiss Court and Chalet Court; g. From R Rural or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 43.6 acres being Steeplechase Phase One Subdivision, Steeplechase Phase Two Subdivision, and Steeplechase Phase Three Subdivision, generally bounded by Navarro Drive, FM 2154, Balcones Drive, and Welsh Avenue; h. From GS General Suburban, R-1B Single Family Residential, or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 38.1 acres being Steeplechase Phase Five Subdivision, Steeplechase Phase Six Subdivision, Southwood Valley Section 23 Subdivision, Volume 525, Page 647, and West Ridge, Block 5, Lots 1A-1B, 2A-2B, 3A-3B, 4A-4B, 5A-5B, 6A-6B, 7A-7B, 8A-8B, 9A-9B, 10A-10B, 11A-11B, 12A-12B, 13A-13B, 14A-14B, 15A-15B, 16A-16B, 17A- 17B, 18A-18B, 19A-19B, 20A-20B, 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B, 24A-24B, and 25A-25B, generally bounded by Deacon Drive, FM 2154, Navarro Drive, and Welsh Avenue; and i. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 14.6 acres being Southwood Valley Section 22B, Block 47, Lots 1-14, Block 48, Lots 1-15 and 20-34, Block 49, Lots 14-29, and Southwood Valley Section 22C, Block 45, Lots 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B, 24A-24B, 25A- 25B, 26A-26B, 27A-27B, 28A-28B, Block 47, Lots 25A-25B, 26A-26B, 27A-27B, 28A-28B, Page 262 of 344 29A-29B, 30A-30B, 31A-31B, and 32A-32B, generally bounded by Deacon Drive, Welsh Avenue, Navarro Drive, and Pedernales Drive. Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity • Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval. Than Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item at their October 5, 2023 meeting and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. Summary: At the August 10 City Council meeting, City staff presented each of these areas along with the feedback staff received during the public engagement process. At the meeting, the City Council gave direction for staff to move forward with bringing these areas as official rezoning cases. After considering the rezoning criteria, City staff has determined that each of these areas is appropriate for rezoning to MH Middle Housing. This item combines several City-initiated rezoning cases to MH Middle Housing, without having the HOO High Occupancy Overlay district. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Area L and Area N Supporting Materials 3. Area U Supporting Materials 4. Area V Supporting Materials 5. Area X Supporting Materials 6. Area BB Supporting Materials 7. Area DD, Area EE, and Area FF Supporting Materials 8. Area 2 Map 9. Area 3 Map 10. Area 4 Map Page 263 of 344 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2 “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AS FOLLOWS: A. FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN OR T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING FOR APPROXIMATELY 15.5 ACRES BEING THE DOBROVOLNY SUBDIVISION AND HOLLEMAN RIDGE SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY ANDERSON STREET, HOLLEMAN DRIVE, AND CHARLES COURT; B. FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN OR T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING FOR APPROXIMATELY 9.73 ACRES BEING LEMON TREE ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-11, BLOCK 2, LOT 1, BLOCK 3, LOTS 1-11, AND PARKWAY PLAZA PHASE 4, BLOCK 3 LOTS 1-14, BLOCK 4, LOTS 1-9, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY ANDERSON STREET, CEDAR RUN, AND LEMON TREE LANE; C. FROM D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING FOR APPROXIMATELY 7.03 ACRES BEING BRENTWOOD SECTION FIVE, BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-16 AND BLOCK 4, LOTS 1-11, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG COLGATE CIRCLE AND STANFORD CIRCLE; D. FROM T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING FOR APPROXIMATELY 6.85 ACRES BEING EASTMARK PHASE II, BLOCK E, LOTS 1R-5R AND LOTS 16-40, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG KALANCHOE COURT, CAMELIA COURT, AND AZALEA COURT; E. FROM T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING FOR APPROXIMATELY 7.4 ACRES BEING KRENEK CROSSING SUBDIVISION, VOLUME 6187, PAGE 138, GENERALLY LOCATED ON NELSON LANE, THORNTON COURT, AND CAMP COURT; F. FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING FOR APPROXIMATELY 3.87 ACRES BEING CHALET VILLAGE SUBDIVISION, VOLUME 420, PAGE 91, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG SWISS COURT AND CHALET COURT; G. FROM R RURAL OR D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING FOR APPROXIMATELY 43.6 ACRES BEING STEEPLECHASE PHASE ONE SUBDIVISION, STEEPLECHASE PHASE TWO SUBDIVISION, AND STEEPLECHASE PHASE THREE SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY NAVARRO DRIVE, FM 2154, BALCONES DRIVE, AND WELSH AVENUE; H. FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN, R-1B SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, OR D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING FOR APPROXIMATELY 38.1 ACRES BEING STEEPLECHASE PHASE FIVE SUBDIVISION, STEEPLECHASE PHASE SIX SUBDIVISION, SOUTHWOOD VALLEY SECTION 23 SUBDIVISION, VOLUME 525, PAGE 647, AND WEST RIDGE, BLOCK 5, LOTS 1A-1B, 2A-2B, 3A-3B, 4A-4B, 5A-5B, 6A-6B, 7A-7B, 8A-8B, 9A-9B, 10A-10B, 11A- Page 264 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 2 of 12 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 11B, 12A-12B, 13A-13B, 14A-14B, 15A-15B, 16A-16B, 17A-17B, 18A-18B, 19A-19B, 20A-20B, 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B, 24A-24B, AND 25A-25B, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY DEACON DRIVE, FM 2154, NAVARRO DRIVE, AND WELSH AVENUE; AND I. FROM D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING FOR APPROXIMATELY 14.6 ACRES BEING SOUTHWOOD VALLEY SECTION 22B, BLOCK 47, LOTS 1-14, BLOCK 48, LOTS 1-15 AND 20-34, BLOCK 49, LOTS 14-29, AND SOUTHWOOD VALLEY SECTION 22C, BLOCK 45, LOTS 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B, 24A-24B, 25A-25B, 26A-26B, 27A-27B, 28A-28B, BLOCK 47, LOTS 25A-25B, 26A-26B, 27A- 27B, 28A-28B, 29A-29B, 30A-30B, 31A-31B, AND 32A-32B, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY DEACON DRIVE, WELSH AVENUE, NAVARRO DRIVE, AND PEDERNALES DRIVE; CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1:That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A”, Exhibit “B”, Exhibit “C”, Exhibit “D”, Exhibit “E”, Exhibit “F”, Exhibit “G”, Exhibit “H”, Exhibit “I”, and Exhibit “J” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2:If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3:That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4:This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective eleven (11) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 26th day of October, 2023. Page 265 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 3 of 12 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 ATTEST: APPROVED: _____________________________ _____________________________ City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney Page 266 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 4 of 12 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit A That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing: The Dobrovolny Subdivision and Holleman Ridge Subdivision Page 267 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 5 of 12 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit B That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing: Lemon Tree Addition, Block 1, Lots 1-11, Block 2, Lot 1, Block 3, Lots 1-11, and Parkway Plaza Phase 4, Block 3 Lots 1-14, Block 4, Lots 1-9 Page 268 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 6 of 12 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit C That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from D Duplex to MH Middle Housing: Brentwood Section Five, Block 1, Lots 1-16 and Block 4, Lots 1-11 Page 269 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 7 of 12 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit D That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing: Eastmark Phase II, Block E, Lots 1R-5R and Lots 16-40 Page 270 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 8 of 12 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit E That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing: Krenek Crossing Subdivision, Volume 6187, Page 138 Page 271 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 9 of 12 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit F That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing: Chalet Village Subdivision, Volume 420, Page 91 Page 272 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 10 of 12 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit G That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from R Rural or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing: Steeplechase Phase One Subdivision, Steeplechase Phase Two Subdivision, and Steeplechase Phase Three Subdivision Page 273 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 11 of 12 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit H That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from GS General Suburban, R-1B Single Family Residential, or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing: Steeplechase Phase Five Subdivision, Steeplechase Phase Six Subdivision, Southwood Valley Section 23 Subdivision, Volume 525, Page 647, and West Ridge, Block 5, Lots 1A-1B, 2A-2B, 3A-3B, 4A-4B, 5A-5B, 6A-6B, 7A-7B, 8A-8B, 9A-9B, 10A-10B, 11A- 11B, 12A-12B, 13A-13B, 14A-14B, 15A-15B, 16A-16B, 17A-17B, 18A-18B, 19A-19B, 20A-20B, 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B, 24A-24B, AND 25A-25B Page 274 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 12 of 12 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit I That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from D Duplex to MH Middle Housing: Southwood Valley Section 22B, Block 47, Lots 1-14, Block 48, Lots 1-15 and 20-34, Block 49, Lots 14-29, and Southwood Valley Section 22C, Block 45, Lots 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B, 24A-24B, 25A-25B, 26A-26B, 27A-27B, 28A-28B, Block 47, Lots 25A-25B, 26A-26B, 27A-27B, 28A-28B, 29A-29B, 30A-30B, 31A-31B, and 32A-32B Page 275 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA L AND AREA N    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject property is surrounded by a park to the north, a multi‐family development to the east,  a park to the south, and townhomes to the west. Development pressure continues to grow as new  generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station;  allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in  the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an  appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses  permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for  additional residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the  surrounding areas.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  Page 276 of 344 development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable  given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 277 of 344 Page 278 of 344 Page 279 of 344 Page 280 of 344 Page 281 of 344 Page 282 of 344 Page 283 of 344 Page 284 of 344 Page 285 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA U    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject property is surrounded by single‐family homes to the north and northeast across  Dartmouth Street. Duplexes are to the southwest and commercial areas to the east across  Southwest Parkway. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students,  young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging  redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting  the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle  Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density  to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  Page 286 of 344 development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable  given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 287 of 344 Page 288 of 344 Page 289 of 344 Page 290 of 344 Page 291 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA V    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject property is surrounded by multi‐family apartments to the north and east across  Southwest Parkway, and Wolf Pen Creek Park to the west. Single‐family homes are to the south  and southwest. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young  professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging  redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting  the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle  Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density  to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  Page 292 of 344 development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable  given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 293 of 344 Page 294 of 344 Page 295 of 344 Page 296 of 344 Page 297 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA X    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject property is surrounded by multi‐family apartments to the northwest and northeast, a  manufactured home park to the west and south, and City of College Station property to the east.  Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young professionals,  families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging redevelopment  opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning  district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the increase in  residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning  district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to meet market  demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure are adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  Page 298 of 344 development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable  given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 299 of 344 Page 300 of 344 Page 301 of 344 Page 302 of 344 Page 303 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA BB    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:    Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject property is surrounded by townhomes to the north and west, single‐family homes to  the east, and duplexes to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations  of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and  encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The  MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale,  permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the  MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional  residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding  areas.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.    4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  Page 304 of 344 development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable  given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 305 of 344 Page 306 of 344 Page 307 of 344 Page 308 of 344 Page 309 of 344 REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA DD, AREA EE, AND AREA FF    1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:     The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character  Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan  provides the following:     Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,  townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single  family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows  original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐ family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood  conservation areas.    The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small  lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.  Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near  community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle  Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.    The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle  housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.    2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of  the surrounding area:     The subject properties are surrounded by single‐family homes, duplexes, townhomes, and a  church to the north, single‐family homes and duplexes to the east, single‐family dwellings and  commercial development to the south and a commercial development, vacant property and  townhomes to the west. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of  students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and  encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The  MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale,  permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the  MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional  residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding  areas.    3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:    The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,  and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional  standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.          Page 310 of 344 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities  generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:    The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the  proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site  development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design  Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved  transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification  and Context Class Map.    5. The marketability of the property:    The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable  given the location of the property.    Staff Recommendation  Staff recommends approval.  Page 311 of 344 Page 312 of 344 Page 313 of 344 Page 314 of 344 Page 315 of 344 Page 316 of 344 Page 317 of 344 Page 318 of 344 Page 319 of 344 Page 320 of 344 Page 321 of 344 Page 322 of 344 Page 323 of 344 Page 324 of 344 Page 325 of 344 Page 326 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 9.8. Rezoning - 701-703 Turner Street Sponsor: Robin Macias Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, "Article 4, Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 0.23 acres generally located at 701-703 Turner Street. Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Core Services & Infrastructure • Neighborhood Integrity • Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item at their October 5, 2023 meeting and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 0.23 acres of land generally located at 701 – 703 Turner St from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay. The subject property is currently developed. It is the applicant’s intent to establish a legal shared housing use through the site plan process. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the following: Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3-12 unit), and limited small-lot single family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi-family residential or mixed-use development and suburban residential or neighborhood conservation areas. The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small lots, small blocks, and well-connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods. Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. This rezoning request aligns with that vision. The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within this land use include: middle housing, Page 327 of 344 duplex, townhouse, and limited-scale single-family zoning. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: This analysis is provided with the understanding that the City-initiated rezoning of Area D to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay would be approved. The subject property is surrounded by single-family homes to the north, east, and west, and duplex properties to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas. Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of the properties within the area. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single-family, townhouse, duplex, and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of this development. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject property fronts Turner Street, and each lot will take access off of it. The proposed use is expected to generate less than 150 trips in any peak hour; therefore, a TIA was not required. 5. The marketability of the property: The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property. Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3. Rezoning Exhibit 4. Background Information 5. Applicant's Supporting Information Page 328 of 344 6. Existing Future Land Use 7. Rezoning Map Page 329 of 344 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2, “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 0.232 ACRES BEING ALL OF A TRACT OF LAND CALLED TO BE “LOT 27” OF PASLER ADDITION IN A DEED TO SALAM INVESTMENTS, LLC IN VOLUME 17375, PAGE 166 AND VOLUME 18475, PAGE 202 (OPRBCT) AND ALL OF A CALLED 0.13 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO SALAM INVESTMENTS, LLC RECORDED IN VOLUME 13901, PAGE 36 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS (OPRBCT) AND SAID 0.13 ACRE TRACT BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS 0.132 ACRES IN A BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT RECORDED IN VOLUME 17907, PAGE 129 (OPRBCT) AND GENERALLY LOCATED AT 701-703 TURNER STREET, AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1:That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2:If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3:That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4:This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 330 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 2 of 5 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 26th day of October, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: _____________________________ _____________________________ City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney Page 331 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 3 of 5 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit A That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Page 332 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 4 of 5 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Page 333 of 344 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ Page 5 of 5 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Exhibit B Page 334 of 344 Page 335 of 344 Page 336 of 344 Page 337 of 344 CHAPPELSTREETTARROWSTCHURCHILL STREETUNIVERSITYDRIVEEASTTURNERSTPOPLARSTREETPASLER STREETASHSTREETNIMITZSTREETPEARCESTREETGILBERTSTREETNIMITZSTREETBANKSSTREETLIVEOAKSTREETASHSTREETPEYTONSTREET1EXISTINGPROPOSEDPROPOSED2023Ex. ARezoningMapT. 979.260.6963F. 979.260.35643204 Earl Rudder FWY SCollege Station, TX 77845Plan & Design Specialists in Civil ꞏ Engineering ꞏ HydraulicsHydrology ꞏ Utilities ꞏ StreetsSite Plans ꞏ Subdivisionswww.mitchellandmorgan.com§1 inch = 150 feet701, 703Turner StNIMITZSTREETUNIVERSITYDRIVEEASTCHAPPELSTREETCHURCHILLSTREETTURNERSTPASLERSTREETPOPLARSTREETASHSTREETPEARCESTREETNIMITZ STREETGILBERTSTREETNIMITZSTREETBANKSSTREETLIVEOAKSTREETASHSTREETPEYTONSTREET1ZoningDescriptionD - DuplexGC - General Commercial!GS - General SuburbanR-6 High Density Multi-Family!MH - Middle HousingThoroughfare PlanFunctionalFuture, 2 Lane Minor CollectorExisting, 6 Lane Major ArterialNOTE: This site does not lie within the100-year floodplain boundary perFEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map panel48041C0215F, Effective Date: April 2, 2014#Owner: SALAM INVESTMENTS LLCLegal Description: PASLER, BLOCK 2, LOT 27-29Acres: 0.23#Owner: SALAM INVESTMENTS LLCLegal Description: PASLER, BLOCK 2, LOT 27-29Acres: 0.23NumberOwner NameCurrent ZoningCurrent Land Use1 EATON OSCAR ESTATE General Suburban Mixed ResidentialSITEASH STNIMITZ STLIVE OAK STUNIVERSITY DRVICINITY MAPTURNER Page 338 of 344 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: October 5, 2023 Advertised Council Hearing Date: October 26, 2023 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: College Hills HOA Property owner notices mailed: 35 Contacts in support: None at the time of this report Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Mixed Residential GS General Suburban Gilbert Street (local street) South Mixed Residential D Duplex Single-family residential East Neighborhood Conservation GS General Suburban Single-family residential West Mixed Residential GS General Suburban Turner Street (local street) DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexed: April 1951 Zoning: unknown (upon annexation 1951) C-2 Commercial Industrial (unknown) R-1 Single Family Residential (2004) GS General Suburban (renamed in 2013) Final Plat:Pasler Site Development:Single-family residential Page 339 of 344 Name of Project:701-703 TURNER STREET REZONING (REZ2023-000016) Address:701 TURNER ST Legal Description:PASLER, BLOCK 2, LOT 27 Total Acreage:0.23 Applicant:: Property Owner:SALAM INVESTMENTS LLC MITCHELL & MORGAN List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The City of College Station recently created a use for high occupancy residential structures that are permitted under the MH Middle Housing zoning district with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. The residence at 701-703 Turner Street falls under this definition. We are requesting a rezoning to MH Middle Housing with the HOO High Occupancy Overlay so that the properties and property owner may be in compliance with zoning and development codes. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. The Comprehensive Plan indicates these properties are designated for Mixed Residential uses. Mixed Residential is intended for a mix of medium density uses. There is a variety of housing densities in in this area of the city that the existing shared housing residence contributes toward, which is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? D Duplex is suitable for the property; however, the property is developed as a single-residence structure that is classified as Shared Housing. MH Middle Housing with a High Occupancy Overlay is the most suitable zoning district for the property and existing development. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. Middle Housing with a High Occupancy Overlay uses contribute to the desired mix of densities and housing types specified in the Mixed Residential land use designation making this development very suitable for the property. Shared housing residences are especially suitable due to the proximity to Texas A&M University. REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 Page 340 of 344 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Middle Housing with a High Occupancy Overlay uses contribute to the desired mix of densities and housing types specified in the Mixed Residential land use designation making this development very suitable for the property. Shared housing residences are especially suitable due to the proximity to Texas A&M University. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. D Duplex are marketable for the properties. However, the residential unit on the properties are now considered Shared Housing units, which are more appropriate under the MH Middle Housing zoning district with the HOO High Occupancy Overlay. List any other reasons to support this zone change. N/A Page 2 of 2 Page 341 of 344 Page 342 of 344 Page 343 of 344 October 26, 2023 Item No. 12.1. Council Reports on Committees, Boards, and Commissions Sponsor: City Council Reviewed By CBC: City Council Agenda Caption: A Council Member may make a report regarding meetings of City Council boards and commissions or meetings of boards and committees on which a Council Member serves as a representative that have met since the last council meeting. (Committees listed in Coversheet) Relationship to Strategic Goals: Good Governance Recommendation(s): Review meetings attended. Summary: Animal Shelter Board, Arts Council of Brazos Valley, Architectural Advisory Committee, Audit Committee, Bond Citizens Advisory Committee, Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board, Bio-Corridor Board of Adjustments, Brazos County Health Dept., Brazos Valley Council of Governments, Brazos Valley Economic Development Corporation, Bryan/College Station Chamber of Commerce, Budget and Finance Committee, BVSWMA, BVWACS, Census Committee Group, Compensation and Benefits Committee, Experience Bryan-College Station, Design Review Board, Economic Development Committee, Gulf Coast Strategic Highway Coalition, Historic Preservation Committee, Interfaith Dialogue Association, Intergovernmental Committee, Joint Relief Funding Review Committee, Landmark Commission, Library Board, Metropolitan Planning Organization, Operation Restart, Parks and Recreation Board, Planning and Zoning Commission, Research Valley Technology Council, Regional Transportation Committee for Council of Governments, Sister Cities Association, Spring Creek Local Government Corporation, Transportation and Mobility Committee, TAMU Student Senate, Texas Municipal League, Walk with the Mayor, YMCA, Zoning Board of Adjustments. (Notice of Agendas posted on City Hall bulletin board.) Budget & Financial Summary: None. Attachments: None Page 344 of 344