HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/05/2023 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionCollege Station, TX
Meeting Agenda
Planning and Zoning Commission
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840
Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting
Meeting ID: 257 325 334 510 | Passcode: iAGMTc
Phone: 833-240-7855 | Phone Conference: 771 141 369#
The City Council may or may not attend this meeting.
October 5, 2023 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, TX Page 1
Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location
stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by
videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a third-
party vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting
access and participation will be in-person only.
1.Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
2.Hear Visitors
At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues
not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The visitor presentations will be limited to three minutes in
order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time
for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look
into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the
meeting; please give your name and address for the record.)
3.Consent Agenda
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be
enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found
compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with
any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens
wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address
the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent
Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Attachments: 1. September 21 2023
3.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Subdivision
Phase XL on approximately 26.549 acres, generally located east of the intersection of Chaco
Canyon Drive and Winema Trail in the City of College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ).
Case #FP2022-000011
Sponsors: Jeff Howell
Attachments: 1. Staff Report
2.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
3.Final Plat
Page 1 of 338
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 2 October 5, 2023
4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
5. Regular Agenda
5.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding waiver requests to the Unified
Development Ordinance Section 8.3.G.2 ‘Blocks’, Section 8.3.J.3 ‘Access Ways,’ and
presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Preliminary Plan for Midtown Reserve
and Midtown City Center Subdivision on approximately 250 acres of land, generally located east
of the Medical District, between Rock Prairie Road and Midtown Drive. Case #PP2023-000011.
Sponsors: Jesse Dimeolo
Attachments: 1. Staff Report
2. Waiver Request
3. Block Length Waiver Exhibit
4. Access Way Waiver Exhibit
5. Applicants Supporting Information
6. Vicinity Map and Aerial
7. Preliminary Plan
5.2. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A , Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development District for
approximately 2.805 acres located at 1115 Anderson Street, generally located at the intersection
of Anderson Street and Clement Street, east of Holleman Drive. Case #REZ2023-000010 (Note:
Final action of this item will be considered at the October 26th, 2023 City Council Meeting –
Subject to change).
Sponsors: Gabriel Schrum
Attachments: 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2. Background Information
3. Applicant's Supporting Information
4. Rezoning Map
5. Existing Future Land Use Map
6. Concept Plan
5.3. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
the Comprehensive Plan to amend the Wellborn Community Plan, to amend the planning areas
and future land use descriptions within Chapter 2. Distinctive Places, to amend the
Comprehensive Plan – Planning Areas Map, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Future Land
Use & Character Map, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Functional Classification & Context
Class Map, and to amend associated maps in the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master
Plan including the Proposed Bicycle Facilities Map and the Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Map.
Case #CPA2023-000002. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 12, 2023,
City Council Meeting – subject to change.)
Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski
Attachments: 1. Wellborn District Plan
2. Chapter 2. Distinctive Places Redlines
3. Chapter 2. Distinctive Places
4. Planning Areas Map, from the Comprehensive Plan
Page 2 of 338
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 3 October 5, 2023
5.Future Land Use & Character Map, from the Comprehensive Plan
6.Functional Classification & Context Class Map, from the Comprehensive
Plan
7.Proposed Bicycle Facilities Map, from the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan
8.Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Map, from the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan
5.4. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official
Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the
zoning district boundaries as follows:
a.From MH Middle Housing or R-4 Multi-Family to MH Middle Housing and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay or R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 2.85 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 10-19, generally
located along Cooner Street;
b.From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy
Overlay for approximately 4.6 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 20-30, and
Block 5, Lots 1-8, generally located along Cooner Street;
c.From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy
Overlay for approximately 5.4 acres being College Vista, Block E, Lots 1-14, Block F, Lots
1-10, Block G, Lots 1-5, Block H, Lots 1-3, 4R-5R, and 6-7, generally located along Live
Oak Street and Ash Street;
d.From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy
Overlay for approximately 5.11 acres being University Oaks Phase 2, Block 5, Lots 1-13,
14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21-23, 24A1-24A2, and 25R, generally located
along Dominik Drive;
e.From MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 4.66 acres being Little-Knight Addition, Lots 1-18, generally located along
Aurora Court, and;
f.From GS General Suburban or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay for approximately 23.62 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel
of land lying and being situated in the Joseph E. Scott League, Abstract No. 50, and
Crawford Burnett League, Abstract No. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas,
including all of the W.M. Sparks Subdivision as described by plat recorded in Volume 139,
Page 261, and portions of West Park Addition and West Park 2nd Addition as described
by plats recorded in Volume 102, Page 198 and Volume 128, Page 574, respectively, of
the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, as well as subsequent replats of portions of
these subdivisions in an area generally bounded by Luther Street, Montclair Avenue,
Grove Street, and Maryem Street;
(Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 26, 2023 City Council Meeting –
subject to change.)
Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski, Jeff Howell, Matthew Ellis, Robin Macias, Gabriel Schrum
Attachments: 1. Area B1, Area B2, and Area D Supporting Materials
2.Area F-G-H Supporting Materials
3.Area J Supporting Materials
4.Area Y Supporting Materials
Page 3 of 338
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 4 October 5, 2023
5.5. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Section 6.3 “Types of Use” of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, for modifications to the shared housing use in
the MH Middle Housing zoning district. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the
October 26, 2023 City Council Meeting – subject to change.)
Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski
Attachments: 1. Section 6.3 Types of Use redlines
5.6. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official
Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the
zoning district boundaries as follows:
a. From GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay
for approximately 2.02 acres being Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lots 1-16 and 17R,
generally located along Lincoln Avenue;
b. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 4.12 acres being Timber Ridge Addition Phase 1, Block 2, Lots 13-24, Block
3, Lots 12-22, generally located along University Oaks Boulevard;
c. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 6.71 acres being Parkway Plaza Phase 5, Block 1, Lots 1-15, Block 2, Lots
1-12, generally located along Pine Ridge Drive;
d. From GS General Suburban or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay for approximately 19.34 acres being Autumn Chase, Block 1, Lots 1-
7, Brentwood Section Two, Block 4, Lots 1-30, Block 5, Lots 1-23, Block 6, Lots 1-4, and
Brentwood Section Three Subdivision, generally located along Cornell Drive, Brentwood
Drive, and Southwest Parkway;
e. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 5.8 acres being Ashford Square Subdivision Replat, Volume 3202, Page
61, generally located along Ashford Drive;
f. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 8.15 acres being Pecan Tree Estates Phase One Subdivision and Pecan
Tree Estates Phase Two Subdivision, save and except 0.687 acres labeled "Park,"
generally located along Oney Hervey Drive;
g. From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay for approximately 28.4 acres being University Heights Phase 1
Subdivision, save and except Common Area 4, and University Heights Phase 2 and 3
Subdivision, generally bounded by Paloma Ridge Drive, Feather Run, Davidson Drive,
and Holleman Drive South;
h. From R Rural to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately
8.8 acres being Las Palomas Subdivision, generally bounded by Abbate Road, Feather
Run, Kenyon Drive, and Holleman Drive South;
i. From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 12.85 acres being The Barracks II Phase 111 Subdivision, and The
Barracks II Phase 112, Block 38, Lots 1-24, Block 39, Lots 1-10, Common Area 13 and
Parkland 12, generally bounded by Towers Parkway, Goldilocks Lane, and Cain Road;
j. From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 18.83 acres being Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 Subdivision, Volume
14370, Page 149, and Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 2A Subdivision, generally bounded
by Deacon Drive West, Towers Parkway, Oak Crest, and Holleman Drive South, and;
Page 4 of 338
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 5 October 5, 2023
k.From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay for approximately 55.49 acres being The Barracks Phase 1
Subdivision, The Barracks Phase 2 Subdivision, Williamsgate Phase 1 Subdivision, Buena
Vida Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 1 Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 2
Subdivision, and 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Rock
Prairie Road West, Towers Parkway, Deacon Drive West, and General Parkway;
(Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 26, 2023 City Council Meeting –
subject to change.)
Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski, Jeff Howell, Matthew Ellis, Robin Macias, Jesse Dimeolo,
Gabriel Schrum
Attachments: 1. Area E Supporting Materials
2.Area I Supporting Materials
3.Area M Supporting Materials
4.Area P-Q-R-S-T Supporting Materials
5.Area W Supporting Materials
6.Area Z Supporting Materials
7.Area HH and Area II Supporting Materials
8.Area JJ-KK, Area LL, and Area MM Supporting Materials
5.7. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official
Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the
zoning district boundaries as follows:
a.From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately
15.5 acres being The Dobrovolny Subdivision and Holleman Ridge Subdivision, generally
bounded by Anderson Street, Holleman Drive, and Charles Court;
b.From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately
9.73 acres being Lemon Tree Addition, Block 1, Lots 1-11, Block 2, Lot 1, Block 3, Lots 1-
11, and Parkway Plaza Phase 4, Block 3, Lots 1-14, Block 4, Lots 1-9, generally bounded
by Anderson Street, Cedar Run, and Lemon Tree Lane;
c.From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 7.03 acres being Brentwood
Section Five, Block 1, Lots 1-16 and Block 4, Lots 1-11, generally located along Colgate
Circle and Stanford Circle;
d.From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 6.85 acres being Eastmark
Phase II, Block E, Lots 1R-5R and Lots 16-40, generally located along Kalanchoe Court,
Camelia Court, and Azalea Court;
e.From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 7.4 acres being Krenek
Crossing Subdivision, Volume 6187, Page 138, generally located along Nelson Lane,
Thornton Court, and Camp Court;
f.From GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing for approximately 3.87 acres being
Chalet Village Subdivision, Volume 420, Page 91, generally located along Swiss Court
and Chalet Court;
g.From R Rural or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 43.6 acres being
Steeplechase Phase One Subdivision, Steeplechase Phase Two Subdivision, and
Steeplechase Phase Three Subdivision, generally bounded by Navarro Drive, FM 2154,
Balcones Drive, and Welsh Avenue;
h.From GS General Suburban, R-1B Single Family Residential, or D Duplex to MH Middle
Housing for approximately 38.1 acres being Steeplechase Phase Five Subdivision,
Page 5 of 338
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 6 October 5, 2023
Steeplechase Phase Six Subdivision, Southwood Valley Section 23 Subdivision, Volume
525, Page 647, and West Ridge, Block 5, Lots 1A-1B, 2A-2B, 3A-3B, 4A-4B, 5A-5B, 6A-
6B, 7A-7B, 8A-8B, 9A-9B, 10A-10B, 11A-11B, 12A-12B, 13A-13B, 14A-14B, 15A-15B,
16A-16B, 17A-17B, 18A-18B, 19A-19B, 20A-20B, 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B, 24A-24B,
and 25A-25B, generally bounded by Deacon Drive, FM 2154, Navarro Drive, and Welsh
Avenue;
i.From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 14.6 acres being Southwood
Valley Section 22B, Block 47, Lots 1-14, Block 48, Lots 1-15 and 20-34, Block 49, Lots
14-29, and Southwood Valley Section 22C, Block 45, Lots 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B,
24A-24B, 25A-25B, 26A-26B, 27A-27B, 28A-28B, Block 47, Lots 25A-25B, 26A-26B, 27A-
27B, 28A-28B, 29A-29B, 30A-30B, 31A-31B, and 32A-32B, generally bounded by Deacon
Drive, Welsh Avenue, Navarro Drive, and Pedernales Drive, and;
j.From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 3.7 acres being Southwood Valley
Section 10A, Block 37, Lots 7-12, and Southwood Valley Section 2, Block 2, Lots 13-26,
generally bounded by Hawk Tree Drive, Rio Grande Boulevard, Airline Drive, and
Southwood Drive;
(Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 26, 2023 City Council Meeting –
subject to change.)
Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski, Jeff Howell, Matthew Ellis, Robin Macias, Jesse Dimeolo,
Gabriel Schrum
Attachments: 1. Area L and Area N Supporting Materials
2.Area U Supporting Materials
3.Area V Supporting Materials
4.Area X Supporting Materials
5.Area BB Supporting Materials
6.Area DD, Area EE, and Area FF Supporting Materials
7.Area GG Supporting Materials
5.8. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, "Article 4, Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official
Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay for approximately 0.23 acres generally located at 701-703 Turner Street.
Case #REZ2023-000016 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the October 26,
2023 City Council Meeting - Subject to change).
Sponsors: Robin Macias
Attachments: 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2.Rezoning Exhibit
3.Background Information
4.Applicant's Supporting Information
5.Existing Future Land Use
6.Rezoning Map
6.Informational Agenda
6.1. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
6.2. Discussion of Minor / Amending Plats approved by Staff:
Page 6 of 338
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 7 October 5, 2023
• Cornerstone Commercial, Section One, Block 1, Lot 2-BR1 & Lot 2-BR2 ~ Case
#FPCO2023-000007
• Cobb Addition, Block 1, Lots 1 & 2 ~ Case #FP2023-000017
Sponsors: Jesse Dimeolo, Robin Macias
6.3. Presentation and discussion on MH Middle Housing rezoning requests.
Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski
Attachments: None
6.4. Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
• Thursday, October 12, 2023 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting
6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, October 19, 2023 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, October 26, 2023 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting
6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, November 2, 2023 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
6.5. Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard.
• A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to adopt the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan.
The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 21, 2023 and voted (5-
0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 28, 2023 and
voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• A rezoning of approximately one acre of land located at 1601 Sebesta Road from M-1 Light
Industrial to SC Suburban Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item
on September 7, 2023 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this
item on September 28, 2023 and voted (6-0) to approve the request.
6.6. Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor
Board.
• None
7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
8. Adjourn.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed
on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on September 29, 2023 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
Page 7 of 338
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 8 October 5, 2023
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting
and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD
at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the
meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification
at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to
provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly
Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire
libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411,
Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad
portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 8 of 338
September 21, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 8
Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting September 21, 2023
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson Dennis Christiansen, Commissioners Bobby
Mirza, Marcus Chaloupka, Melissa McIlhaney, and Aron Collins
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioners Jason Cornelius and David White
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmember Dennis Maloney
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Planning & Development Services Michael Ostrowski, Transportation Planning Coordinator Jason Schubert, Land Development Review Administrator Anthony Armstrong, Senior Planners Jeff Howell and Matthew Ellis, Staff Planner Jesse DiMeolo, Assistant City Attorney II Aaron Longoria, Administrative Support Specialist Kristen Hejny, Staff
Assistant Tiffany Romero, and Technology Services Specialist Lillian Wells
1.Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
Chairperson Christiansen called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2.Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
3.Consent Agenda
3.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
•September 7, 2023
3.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Easton Subdivision Block 1, Lots 1 and 2 on approximately .24 acres, located at 111 Sterling Street. Case #FP2023-000006
Commissioner Chaloupka motioned to approve the Consent Agenda, Commissioner Collins seconded the motion, the motion passed 5-0.
4.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the ConsentAgenda by Commission Action.
No items were removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion.
Page 9 of 338
September 21, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 8
5. Regular Agenda
5.1 Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding waiver requests to the Unified
Development Ordinance Section 8.4.A. ‘Reserved Strips and Tracts Prohibited’, Section 8.4.C.3.b. ‘Street Projections’, Section 8.4.C.7. ‘Cul-de-sac’, Section 8.4.E.1. ‘Blocks’, and presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Preliminary Plan for Arrowhead Village Phase 1-3 on approximately 46.6 acres of land, generally located south
of the intersection of Arrington Road and Harper’s Ferry Road. Case #PP2023-000009.
Senior Planner Howell presented the waiver requests and preliminary plan to the Commission recommending denial of both.
Chairperson Christiansen asked if Brazos County had reviewed the preliminary plan and
waiver requests. Senior Planner Howell clarified that Brazos County was included in the review process and had no comments.
Chairperson Christiansen asked if the adjacent properties have access through an easement. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that an access easement is the current access point to the adjacent properties.
Chairperson Christiansen asked for clarification regarding the emergency services requirement that two access points to the development are required. Senior Planner Howell clarified that the developer is proposing 30 lots which does not
exceed the threshold for secondary access point requirements, a single point of access
is allowed. Commissioner Mirza asked if there were drawings for stormwater detention.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that the preliminary plan does show contours that identify
detention in common areas. Commissioner McIlhaney asked for clarification on the property abutting the College Station Independent School District owned property to the north.
Senior Planner Howell stated that the abutting properties are privately and individually owned. Travis Martinek, Applicant, was available to address the Commission, answering questions
regarding abutting property owners and drainage on the property.
Page 10 of 338
September 21, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8
Commissioner Collins stated that special circumstances were not identified by staff, asking the applicant for special circumstances to justify the granting of the waivers.
Mr. Martinek clarified that special circumstances are primarily the will of the neighbors to provide less roadway, and to provide the subdivision with some exclusivity. Chairperson Christiansen asked the applicant to comment on the City’s concerns regarding
the length of the cul-de-sacs.
Mr. Martinek stated that the configuration of the property does not allow for a second access point and cul-de-sacs were placed as they fit.
Chairperson Christiansen asked if the applicant reviewed different layouts to alleviate the
cul-de-sac length issue. Mr. Martinek stated that most buyers desire cul-de-sac lots and one access point.
Chairperson Christiansen asked for clarification that if the Commission denies the waivers,
they must then deny the preliminary plan. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that if the Commission denies the waivers, they must then deny the preliminary plan or approve with conditions.
Commissioner McIlhaney asked for fire provisions in this area. Senior Planner Howell clarified that this development is outside the City of College Station’s city limits.
Mr. Martinek clarified that this area is covered by Emergency Services District One. Commissioner McIlhaney asked for the average cost of homes in this development.
Mr. Martinek clarified that the homes would be listed for approximately $1,000,000.
Administrator Armstrong clarified that fire requirements in the City’s fire code do not apply in the City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Mr. Armstrong further clarified that subdivision regulations do apply in the ETJ and are based off fire code requirements.
Commissioner Collins asked for the purpose of block length requirements. Senior Planner Howell clarified that block length requirements are used to break up subdivisions and to provide for additional connectivity.
Mr. Martinek stated that the only way to create a connectivity block length would be to connect near Deer Park Drive.
Page 11 of 338
September 21, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 8
Commissioner McIlhaney expressed concerns with no connectivity within the subdivision for emergency services, creating a safety issue.
Mr. Martinek clarified that cul-de-sacs would be designed to meet street design guidelines.
Chairperson Christiansen stated that if there were an emergency response, streets would be blocked with no way in or out of the subdivision.
Commissioner McIlhaney spoke in opposition to the waiver requests and preliminary plan.
Commissioner Mirza asked if the development could be annexed, and if the development meets city guidelines if annexed.
Senior Planner Howell stated that if the development were annexed, annexation would be property owner driven and zoned appropriately upon annexation. Mr. Howell also stated that the property is unplatted so subdivision regulations would apply.
Director Ostrowski clarified that this request would not meet subdivision regulations
requirements upon annexation.
Commissioner Collins spoke in opposition to the waiver requests and preliminary plan.
Commissioner Chaloupka spoke in opposition to the waiver requests and preliminary plan.
Chairperson Christiansen spoke in opposition to the waiver requests and preliminary plan.
Commissioner McIlhaney motioned to deny the waiver requests and preliminary plan
as presented, Commissioner Mirza seconded the motion, the motion passed 5-0.
5.2 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan to adopt the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan,
to amend the planning areas description within Chapter 2. Distinctive Places, to amend the
Comprehensive Plan – Planning Areas Map, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Future Land Use & Character Map, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Functional Classification & Context Class Map, and to amend associated maps in the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan including the Proposed Bicycle Facilities Map and the Proposed
Pedestrian Facilities Map. Case #CPA2023-000001. (Note: Final action on this item is
scheduled for the September 28, 2023 City Council Meeting – subject to change.)
Senior Planner Ellis presented the ordinance amendment to the Commission recommending approval.
Commissioner Collins asked for clarification on a grade-separated crossing.
Page 12 of 338
September 21, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 8
Senior Planner Ellis stated that grade-separated facilities would be either above or below grade, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Mr. Ellis stated that the action in the plan is to
assess the feasibility and use, stating that these facilities could be a pedestrian bridge or a
tunnel under the roadway.
Commissioner Collins clarified that a grade-separated crossing is of limited use in this area where staff is trying to create a pedestrian and bicycle friendly area, unless users can use
Texas Avenue to cross over University Drive.
Commissioner Chaloupka stated that assessing the crossing, University Drive should be on a shorter timeline and staff should look at access points to cross Texas Avenue. Mr. Chaloupka further stated that issues will need to be addressed in five years and staff needs
to address crossing major thoroughfares.
Commissioner Mirza asked for clarification on affordable housing along Lincoln Avenue as part of the plan.
Senior Planner Ellis stated that the plan addresses investments that the City can make to
set up development for an affordable housing incentive program.
Commissioner McIlhaney asked if the City had any data concerning bicycle activity in these areas.
Senior Planner Ellis stated that the Existing Conditions Report included a map pulled from STRAVA containing recent bicycle activity data.
Chairperson Christiansen asked if there were plans to make on-street bicycle separations
by paint stripe.
Senior Planner Ellis stated that the goal of the planning effort was to identify the facility and then decide the design during construction.
Chairperson Christiansen stated that he would like to see a longer-range plan where bicycle
lanes were not separated by a paint stripe.
Chairperson Christiansen opened the public hearing.
No visitors spoke.
Chairperson Christiansen closed the public hearing.
Chairperson Christiansen stated that data missing is what is the population demand staff is
trying to serve.
Page 13 of 338
September 21, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 8
Commissioner Collins motioned to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion.
Commissioner Chaloupka expressed concerns that this plan does not look far enough into the future. The motion passed 5-0.
5.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the PDS Plan of Work. Director Ostrowski requested feedback from the Commission on the proposed Plan of Work.
Chairperson Christiansen stated that staff needs to identify housing needs in College Station, to meet demands. Director Ostrowski stated that staff does calculate the demand needed over a planning
period, stating that planning to 2030, there would need to be about 7,200 additional housing
units to meet the 2% - 2.5% growth rate. Commissioner Mirza asked if staff considers the Texas A&M University Rellis Campus into calculation.
Director Ostrowski stated that staff does take into consideration the growth of the university, but individual components could change the growth potential. Commissioner Collins would like to be prepared to meet the housing needs of the city and
would like to see a proactive step toward creating an environment for growth.
Commissioner Chaloupka motioned to approve the PDS Plan of work, Commissioner Mirza seconded the motion, the motion passed 5-0.
6. Informational Agenda
6.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
6.2 Presentation and discussion on MH Middle Housing rezoning requests.
Director Ostrowski provided updates on the MH Middle Housing zoning district and
Shared Housing site plan applications.
Commissioner Chaloupka asked for a status on MH Middle Housing site plan submittals.
Page 14 of 338
September 21, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8
Director Ostrowski stated that 25 site plans have been submitted, five have been approved.
6.3 Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard:
• A rezoning of approximately 0.35 of an acre of land located at 710 Vassar Court from D Duplex to MF Multi-Family. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 7, 2023 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 14, 2023 and voted (7-0) to approve the
request.
• A rezoning of approximately 48 acres of land located in the Greater Southwood area creating a Restricted Occupancy Overlay. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 7, 2023 and the vote to recommend approval failed (3-4). The City Council heard this item on September 14, 2023 and
voted (6-1) to approve the request.
• An ordinance amendment regarding parking and access standards for developments in the MH Middle Housing zoning district. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 7, 2023 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The
City Council heard this item on September 14, 2023 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• An ordinance amendment creating a High Occupancy Overlay. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 7, 2023 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 14, 2023 and
voted (7-0) to approve the request.
There was no discussion.
6.4 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
• Thursday, September 28, 2023 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~
Open Meeting 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, October 5, 2023 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, October 12, 2023 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open
Meeting 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, October 19, 2023 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Cancelled
There was no discussion.
6.5 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and
BioCorridor Board.
• None
There was no discussion. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
Page 15 of 338
September 21, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 8
A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may
be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda
for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion. 8. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 7:06 p.m. Approved: Attest:
___________________________________ _________________________________
Dennis Christiansen, Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Board Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Page 16 of 338
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 5, 2023
Scale 8 residential lots and common area on approximately 26.549 acres
Location Generally east of the intersection of Chaco Canyon Drive and Winema
Trail in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Property Owner Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd.
Applicant Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd.
Project Manager Jeff Howell, Senior Planner
jhowell@cstx.gov
Project Overview This plat will establish lots within the Indian Lakes Subdivision. This
phase of the development will consist of 8 residential lots, and one
common area. The property is located in the City’s ETJ and all lots are
over one acre in size.
Preliminary Plan January 2022
Public Infrastructure 868 linear feet of Wellborn SUD waterline
1,156 linear feet of County streets
Parkland Dedication Not required as this area is vested to the Indian Lakes Subdivision
Master Plan.
Traffic Impact Analysis Not required
Compliant with Comprehensive Plan
(including Master Plans) and Unified
Development Ordinance
Yes
Compliant with Subdivision
Regulations
Yes
Staff Recommendation Approval
Supporting Materials
1. Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2. Final Plat
Final Plat
of
Indian Lakes Subdivision Phase XL
FP2022-000011
Page 17 of 338
Page 18 of 338
Page 19 of 338
Page 20 of 338
1600FeetPage 21 of 338
“”‐‐‐‐“”’’’’2SITEPage 22 of 338
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 5, 2023
Scale 833 lots on approximately 250 acres of land
Location Generally located east of the Medical District, between
Rock Prairie Road and Midtown Drive.
Applicant Schultz Engineering
Project Manager Jesse DiMeolo, Staff Planner
jdimeolo@cstx.gov
Project Overview In April 2017, the subject property was rezoned to PDD
Planned Development District and further amended in
2020. The original preliminary plan was approved in
November 2018 and the most recent preliminary plan was
approved in December 2021. This revised preliminary plan
changes the phasing of the development and requests two
additional waivers, one to block length and the other to
access ways. Divided into 36 phases, this preliminary plan is
for the continued subdivision of the property into 699
Single-Family lots and 134 multi-family and/or commercial
lots and includes the extension of a 10’ wide path through
phase 501 and the realignment of another 10’ wide path
through phase 115 and the adjacent Rock Prairie Baptist
Church property. This realignment was approved by City
Council through a concept plan amendment of the PDD.
Parkland Dedication 34.244 acres of public parkland will be dedicated and
developed with this Preliminary Plan. Additional Parkland
may be required based on future Multi-Family
development in the Midtown City Center portion of the
proposed subdivision in accordance with the terms of the
PDD.
Traffic Impact Analysis A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was updated in May 2020 for
Midtown Reserve & Midtown City Center Subdivision. The
land use assumptions include residential and non-
residential uses (offices, a recreational community center, a
shopping center, retail, restaurants, hotel rooms) to be
developed in three phases and include traffic mitigation.
This preliminary plan poses an increase in the number of
multifamily units assumed in the TIA. Thus, the applicant
provided a letter stamped by a licensed professional
engineer to affirm that these land use changes are still
within the TIA’s assumed trip generation because the
increase in multifamily units will be accounted for by a
reduction in senior housing units.
Preliminary Plan
for
Midtown Reserve & Midtown City Center
Subdivision
PP2023-000011
Page 23 of 338
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 5, 2023
Staff requested that the applicant include a note on the
Final Plat for Midtown Phase 406A that evidences these
changes in land use assumptions.
Compliant with Comprehensive Plan
(including Master Plans) and Unified
Development Ordinance
Yes, with the exception of waivers previously approved in
November 2018, July 2019, December 2021, and the
waivers being requested with this preliminary plan.
Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, with the exception of the waivers previously approved
in 2018, 2019, and 2021 to block length and land dedication
for parkland and what is currently being requested for
Section 8.3.G.2 ‘Block Length’ and Section 8.3.J.3 ‘Access
Ways.’
Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the waivers and the
Preliminary Plan.
Supporting Materials
1. Waiver Request
2. Block Length Waiver Exhibit
3. Access Way Waiver Exhibit
4. Applicant’s Supporting Information
5. Vicinity Map and Aerial
6. Preliminary Plan
Page 24 of 338
SUBDIVISION WAIVER REQUEST
The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations
contained in the UDO except for the following waiver request:
UDO Section 8.3.G.2 ‘Blocks’ (Block Length for General Urban) - Per the
requirements of this section, block length should be a maximum of 900 feet for areas
designated as General Urban on the Thoroughfare Plan Functional Classification and
Context Class Map. As shown in the attached waiver exhibit, the first waiver request is
for the block length along Durham Drive, from Double Mountain Road to Midtown Drive.
This distance is approximately 1,351 feet, which exceeds the maximum block length by
451 feet. The applicant is requesting this waiver as their intention is to match the
construction plans of the adjacent multifamily tract to the west that is constructing a 10’
wide path to the property line. The Midtown City Center developer is requesting to
continue this path through block 26 to connect into Durham Drive.
UDO Section 8.3.J.3 ‘Access Ways’ – Per the requirements of this section, in order to
provide additional pedestrian and bicycle circulation, an access way shall be required on
a cul-de-sac street to connect to existing or planned facilities in the vicinity such as
schools, parks, transit stops, and multi-use paths. As shown in the attached waiver
exhibit, the second waiver request is for this required connection between the cul-de-sac
of Fork Court in Phase 111 and the adjacent multi-use path in common area 20 of Phase
109. A possible design option is shown in purple on the attached waiver exhibit. Strict
adherence to the UDO requirement would result in significant disturbance upon the Lick
Creek Tributary in the natural area highlighted in green. The applicant states the design
option shown on the exhibit is not compatible with the intent of the PDD ordinances to
maintain protected natural areas as a unique feature of the neighborhood.
In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and
Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver:
1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such
that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of
the reasonable use of his land;
There are special circumstances and conditions affecting the land for both waiver
requests. The applicant’s waiver exhibit and preliminary plan show block 26 on the far
western edge of the subdivision, directly adjacent to a tract of land that was also recently
granted waivers to block length. Instead of constructing a public street through the site, the
adjacent property is building a 10’ wide path from Medical Avenue that will connect into
both Midtown Drive and Durham Drive. This design is needed to continue through block
26, thus nullifying the need of a public through street that would just terminate at the
property boundary as a dead-end street.
The special circumstance of the second waiver is more straightforward. As stated in the
summary above, a large, existing tributary runs between the residential lots on Fork Court
and the multi-use path. With the Double Mountain Road crossing just to the north,
requiring a second crossing just south of that creates a serious burden for the applicant. If
the distance between the two crossings was greater, a different discussion may be had.
Page 25 of 338
2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant;
The applicant has stated that granting the waivers are necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of property rights of the landowner. The construction of a dead-end street at
the property line, that will not be continued through because of past waivers, would be
detrimental to future utilization of the mixed-use tract of land. A significant amount of right-
of-way would need to be carved out that could otherwise be used for development.
For the second waiver, substantial amounts of existing trees and landscaping would have
to be removed to provide space for the crossing. This would be a detriment not only to the
developer but also future homeowners who may enjoy a landscaped rear yard along the
creek. In addition to this, the pedestrian crossing would most likely create drainage issues
for the tributary.
3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering
this chapter; and
The granting of these waivers would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare of other properties in the area as this development will comply with all other
standards and requirements found in the Unified Development Ordinance.
4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this
chapter.
These waivers will not have a negative effect on the orderly subdivision of land as the
adjacent subject tract for the first waiver is already approved and platted. The same goes
for the second waiver. Along the entirety of the eastern edge of Phase 111 and Fork Court,
the floodplain of the Lick Creek tributary restricts the ability to may connections to the multi-
use path on the other side. A short walk of around 500’ will get the residents of this cul-de-
sac to the crossing on Double Mountain Road where the multi-use path has a mid-block
pedestrian crosswalk.
If the Commission approves any or all of the waivers, the Commission shall incorporate
the findings of each waiver into the official minutes of the meetings at which such waiver is
granted. If any of the waivers are denied, then the preliminary plan is also denied, unless a
conditional approval is granted. For this preliminary plan to be approved as proposed, all
waivers need to be accepted. Waivers may be granted only when in harmony with the
general purpose and intent of this UDO so that public health, safety, and welfare may be
secured and substantial justice done.
Staff is recommending approval of the waiver requests.
Page 26 of 338
DOU
B
L
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
R
O
A
D
M
I
D
T
OW
N
D
R
I
V
E DURHAM DRIVEDURHAM DRIVETOWN LAKE DRIVEDOROTHY LANE MURR LANEMURR LANETOC
O
D
E
R
O
A
D
PUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEYMURR LANEPUBL
I
C
A
L
L
E
Y PUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEYBLOCK
22
PHASE 405
BLOCK 25
BLOCK
22
PHASE 501
BLOCK 26
PHASE 501
BLOCK 26
PHASE 601
BLOCK 35
PHASE 403
BLOCK 30
PHASE 402
BLOCK 29
PHASE 403
BLOCK 28
PHASE
404B
BLOCK
17
BLOCK 38
MEDICAL
A
VENUE
DOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
BLOCK EXHIBIT
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER
SUBDIVISION
JULY, 2023
Page 27 of 338
FORK COURT
12
3
4
5
6
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
36
1
2
3
4
1
2
DOUBLE MOUN
T
A
I
N
R
O
A
D
CALAVERAS COURT
COMMON AREA 20
AND PrDE
DOUBLE MOUNT
A
I
N
R
O
A
D
DOUBLE MOUN
T
A
I
N
R
O
A
D
FORK COURTC
A
L
A
V
E
R
A
S
C
O
U
R
T
11
11
LEGEND
LEGEND
WAIVER 2 EXHIBIT
MIDTOWN RESERVE
SUBDIVISION
SEPTEMBER, 2023
Page 28 of 338
Waiver to Article 8.3.G.2.c Block Length
Justification for Waiver 1 – Block 26:
The requested waiver is for BLOCK LENGTH 1, BLOCK 26, which is 1,351 feet in length
which exceeds the maximum block length of 900’ by 451’. This block length is located on
the east of BLOCK 26.
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that
strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the
reasonable use of his land.
The adjacent 16.90 acre tract was granted a waiver for block length and its
Preliminary Plan was approved without a connecting street. Breaking the block
with a street off Durham Drive would not break the block length since it would
not go through to Medical Avenue.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right
of the applicant.
Construction of a dead-end street to break the block could be a detriment to the
future use of the property.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering
subdivision regulations.
The granting of this waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property as the development will comply with all
other standards and requirements.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision
of other land in the area in accordance with the previsions of the Unified Development
Ordinance.
The grating of this waiver will not affect the subdivision of other land since this
block is internal to this subdivision and does not affect any other properties.
Page 29 of 338
Waiver to Article 8.3.J.3 Access Ways
Justification for Pedestrian Circulation out of Fork Court cul-de-sac to Multi-use Path:
The requested waiver 2 is to not provide an access way from Fork Court, a cul-de-sac street,
to an existing multi-use path.
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that
strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the
reasonable use of his land.
There is a stream in the Natural Area Protected zones area between the street
and the existing multi-use path. The construction of a connecting path would
require the removal of trees and a significant drainage structure to be installed
in the stream.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right
of the applicant.
Fork Court is approximately 500’ in length so it is a short walk to Double
Mountain Road and then to the existing path. Maintaining the trees in the
protected area offsets the value of an access way.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering
subdivision regulations.
The granting of this waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property as the development will comply with all
other standards and requirements. The existing multi-use path can easily be
accessed by using the sidewalks along Fork Court and Double Mountain Road.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision
of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development
Ordinance.
The granting of this waiver will not affect the subdivision of other land since this
phase is internal to the Midtown Reserve subdivision and does not affect any
other properties.
Page 30 of 338
Page 31 of 338
Page 32 of 338
ROCK PRAIRIE ROADBIRD POND RDCOFFEE M
ILL
LANETOLEDO BEND
DR
IVE
GIBBO
N
S
W
A
Y
TOLEDO BEND
DR
IVE KICKAPOO
LANE
MINERAL WELLS LANE
TOLEDO BEND
DR
IVE
LA
D
Y
B
I
R
D
L
A
N
ETOLEDO BEND DRIVELADY B
IRD
LANE
LIVIN
G
S
T
O
N
D
R
I
V
ETOLEDO BEND DRIVETOLEDO BEND DRIVEMCQUEENY DRIVE
TOLEDO BEND DRIVE
TOWN LAKE DRIVEPUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEY
AMISTAD LOOPGRANGER LANE
AMISTAD LOOPDOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
PUBLIC ALLEY
TOLEDO BEND
DR
IVE
TOW
N
L
A
K
E
D
RIVE TOWN LAKE DRIVEDOUBL
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
R
O
A
D
MI
D
T
O
W
N
D
R
I
V
E
MI
D
T
O
W
N
D
R
I
V
E
DOUBLE MOUNTAIN RD
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
AMISTAD LOOP
DURHAM DRIVEDURHAM DRIVEPUBLIC ALLEY
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp Curb Ramp Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp Curb Ramp Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
BLOCK
1
BLOCK
2
BLOCK
3
BLOCK
7
BLOCK
7
BLOCK 4
BLOCK
6
BLOCK
6
BLOCK
8
BLOCK
9
BLOCK
9
BLOCK 34
BLOCK
1
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
10
BLOCK
11
BLOCK
4
BLOCK 13
BLOCK
17
BLOCK
18
BLOCK
19
BLOCK
20
BLOCK
21
BLOCK
22
BLOCK
23
BLOCK
23
BLOCK
6
BLOCK
6
BLOCK
5
BLOCK
36
BLOCK
1
BLOCK
1
BLOCK
1
BLOCK 34
BLOCK
3
BLOCK
3
BLOCK
3
BLOCK
7
BLOCK
5
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
24
BLOCK
5
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
5
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 8
BLOCK
11
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 25
BLOCK 26
BLOCK 26
BLOCK 35
BLOCK 33
BLOCK 32
AMISTAD LOOP AMISTAD LOOPDOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
TOWN LAKE DRIVETOWN L
AKE DRIVETOWN LA
KE DRIVE
591.94
Paver-BlockOutPaverStrip
Paver-BlockOut
BLOCK 30
BLOCK 29
BLOCK 31
DOROTHY LANE DOROTHY LANEMURR LANEMURR LANEMURR LANE
DURH
A
M LOOP
BLOCK 28
TOCOD
E
R
O
A
D
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
M
I
D
T
O
W
N
L
O
O
P FORK COURTPARK APARK BPARK CPARK C
PARK D
PARK F
PARK G
PARK H
PARK I PARK JPARK KPARK L
PARK M
PARK Y PARK N
PARK NPARK O3
PARK E
PARK O2
PARK O1PARK PPARK QPARK R
PARK SPARK TPARK UPARK VPA
R
K
W
PARK X
BLOCK 15
BLOCK 14
BLOCK
11
BLOCK
15
BLOCK 15
BLOCK
11
BLOCK 11
BLOCK
14
BLOCK
16
BLOCK
37
BLOCK
37
BLOCK
36
BLOCK
10
BLOCK 12
BLOCK 16
BLOCK
9
BLOCK
37
BLOCK 13
BLOCK 12
BLOCK 13
BLOCK
10
DOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
BLOCK 4
T
O
L
E
D
O
B
E
N
D
D
R
I
V
E
KI
C
K
A
P
O
O
L
A
N
E CALAVERAS COURTCALAVERAS COURTBLOCK
17
BLOCK
17 HARRIS DRIVEPUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEYBRADLEY ROADPARK Z TEXANA DRIVEBLOCK 23
BLOCK 38
COFFEE MILL LANEMURR LANEPUBLIC
A
L
L
E
Y
PUBLIC ALLEY
AMISTAD LOOP
PUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEY
PARK CC
PHASE 201
16137/4
PHASE 200
15895/98
PHASE 102
15612/31
PHASE 104
16137/29
PHASE 105
16507/277
PHASE 114
PHASE 100
15518/139
PHASE 107
PHASE 301
15731/206
PHASE 302
PHASE 403
PHASE 501
PHASE
701
PHASE 602
PHASE 103
15905/174PHASE 403
PHASE 401
PHASE 402
PHASE 405
PHASE 303
PHASE 304
PHASE 305
PHASE 108
PHASE 601
15575/72
PHASE 106
PHASE 112
PHASE 110 PHASE 110
PHASE 110
PHASE 110
PHASE 113
PHASE 113
PHASE 111
PHASE 115
PHASE 109
PHASE 114
PHASE 109
PHASE 404APHASE 404BPHASE 109
PHASE 109
PHASE 406B
PHASE 406A
PHASE
404C
PHASE
406C
LEGEND
LEGENDMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINECurb RampCurb Ramp Curb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb Ramp Curb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
591.94
Paver-BlockOutPaverStrip
Paver-BlockOut
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE
37
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
TOLEDO BEND
RDTOWN LAKE DRIVEDOUBLE MOUNTAIN RD
M
I
D
T
O
W
N
D
R
I
V
E
SHEET INDEXBIRD POND
RD
OWNER/MANAGING
MEMBER OF
ROCK PRAIRIE
MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT No. 2:
Geva Uri
2809 Brothers Blvd.
College Station, TX
77845
OWNER:
Logan Lee
1851 Harris Drive
College Station, TX 77845
OWNER:
Glover Hays
300 Suffolk Ave.
College Station, TX 77840
OWNER:
Mark Lindemulder
4800 Wayne Ct.
College Station, TX 77845
OWNER:
Kerbel Samuel
4905 Williams Ridge Ct
College Station, TX 77845
SHEE
T
4
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
5
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
6
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
8
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
9
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
0
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
2
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
3
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
4
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
5
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
6
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
7
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
7
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
1
O
F
1
7
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
ROCK PRAIRIE RD.BIRD P
O
N
D R
D.MEDICAL AVE.PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
TOLEDO BEND
RDTOWN LAKE DRIVEDOUBLE MOUNTAIN RD
M
I
D
T
O
W
N
D
R
I
V
E
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
TOLEDO BEND
RDTOWN LAKE DRIVEDOUBLE MOUNTAIN RD
M
I
D
T
O
W
N
D
R
I
V
E
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 01Page 33 of 338
ROCK PRAIRIE ROADBIRD POND RDCOFFEE MILL
LANETOLEDO BEND
DR
IVE
GIBBO
N
S
W
A
Y
TOLEDO BEND
DR
IVE KICKAPOO
LANE
MINERAL WELLS LANE
TOLEDO BEND
DR
IVE
LA
D
Y
B
I
R
D
L
A
N
ETOLEDO BEND DRIVELADY B
IRD
LANE
LIVIN
G
S
T
O
N
D
R
I
V
ETOLEDO BEND DRIVETOLEDO BEND DRIVEMCQUEENY DRIVE
TOLEDO BEND DRIVE
TOWN LAKE DRIVEPUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEY
AMISTAD LOOPGRANGER LANE
AMISTAD LOOPDOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
PUBLIC ALLEY
TOLEDO BEND
DR
IVETOW
N L
A
KE
DRI
V
E TOWN LAKE DRIVEDOUBL
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
R
O
A
D
MI
D
T
O
W
N
D
R
I
V
E
MI
D
T
O
W
N
D
R
I
V
E
DOUBLE MOUNTAIN RD
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
AMISTAD LOOP
DURHAM DRIVEDURHAM DRIVEPUBLIC ALLEY
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp Curb Ramp Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp Curb Ramp Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
BLOCK
1
BLOCK
2
BLOCK
3
BLOCK
7
BLOCK
7
BLOCK 4
BLOCK
6
BLOCK
6
BLOCK
8
BLOCK
9
BLOCK
9
BLOCK 34
BLOCK
1
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
10
BLOCK
11
BLOCK
4
BLOCK 13
BLOCK
17
BLOCK
18
BLOCK
19
BLOCK
20
BLOCK
21
BLOCK
22
BLOCK
23
BLOCK
23
BLOCK
6
BLOCK
6
BLOCK
5
BLOCK
36
BLOCK
1
BLOCK
1
BLOCK
1
BLOCK 34
BLOCK
3
BLOCK
3
BLOCK
3
BLOCK
7
BLOCK
5
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
24
BLOCK
5
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
5
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 8
BLOCK
11
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 25
BLOCK 26
BLOCK 26
BLOCK 35
BLOCK 33
BLOCK 32
AMISTAD LOOP AMISTAD LOOPDOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
TOWN LAKE DRIVETOWN LAKE DRIVE TOWN LAKE DRIVE
591.94
Paver-BlockOutPaverStrip
Paver-BlockOut
BLOCK 30
BLOCK 29
BLOCK 31
DOROTHY LANE DOROTHY LANEMURR LANEMURR LANEMURR LA
NE
DURHAM LOOP
BLOCK 28
TOCOD
E
R
O
A
D
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
M
I
D
T
O
W
N
L
O
O
P FORK COURTPARK APARK BPARK CPARK C
PARK D
PARK F
PARK G
PARK H
PARK I PARK JPARK KPARK L
PARK M
PARK Y PARK N
PARK NPARK O3
PARK E
PARK O2
PARK O1PARK PPARK QPARK R
PARK SPARK TPARK UPARK V
PA
R
K
W
PARK X
BLOCK 15
BLOCK 14
BLOCK
11
BLOCK
15
BLOCK 15
BLOCK
11
BLOCK 11
BLOCK
14
BLOCK
16
BLOCK
37
BLOCK
37
BLOCK
36
BLOCK
10
BLOCK 12
BLOCK 16
BLOCK
9
BLOCK
37
BLOCK 13
BLOCK 12
BLOCK 13
BLOCK
10
DOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
BLOCK 4
TO
L
E
D
O
B
E
N
D
D
R
I
V
E
KI
C
K
A
P
O
O
L
A
N
E CALAVERA
S
COUR
T CALAVERAS COURTBLOCK
17
BLOCK
17 HARRIS DRIVEPUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEYBRADLEY ROADPARK Z TEXANA DRIVEBLOCK 23
BLOCK 38
COFFEE
MILL LANEMURR LANEPUBLIC
A
L
L
E
Y
PUBLIC ALLEY
AMISTAD LOOP
PUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEY
PARK CC
PHASE 201
16137/4
PHASE 201
16137/4
PHASE 102
15612/31
PHASE 104
16137/29
PHASE 105
16507/277
PHASE 106
PHASE 100
15518/139
PHASE 301
15731/206
PHASE 302
PHASE 501
PHASE 701
PHASE 406B
PHASE 501
PHASE 402
PHASE 602
PHASE 108
PHASE 108 PHASE 107
PHASE 107
PHASE 105
16507/277
PHASE 106
PHASE 406A
PHASE 304
PHASE 103
PHASE 405
PHASE 403
PHASE 401
PHASE 303
PHASE 301
15731/206
PHASE 304
PHASE 305
PHASE 303
PHASE 200
15895/98
PHASE 601
15575/72
PHASE 108 PHASE 108
PHASE 108
PHASE 107
PHASE 200
15895/98
PHASE 113
PHASE 107
PHASE 102
15612/31
PHASE 112
PHASE 109
PHASE 115
PHASE 110
PHASE 110
PHASE 110
PHASE 113
PHASE 111
PHASE 109
PHASE 109
PHASE 115
PHASE 114
PHASE 115
PHASE 404APHASE 404BPHASE
404C
PHASE
406C
LEGEND
LEGENDMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINECurb RampCurb Ramp Curb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb Ramp Curb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb RampCurb Ramp
591.94
Paver-BlockOutPaverStrip
Paver-BlockOut
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE
37
M
I
D
T
O
W
N
D
R
I
V
E TOLEDO BEND
RD
DOUBLE MOUNTAIN RDBIRD POND RDSHEE
T
4
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
5
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
6
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
8
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
9
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
0
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
2
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
3
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
4
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
5
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
6
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
7
O
F
1
7
SHEET INDEX
ROCK PRAIRIE ROADBIRD POND
RDPHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
SHEE
T
7
O
F
1
7
SHEE
T
1
1
O
F
1
7
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 02Page 34 of 338
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 03Page 35 of 338
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEDOUBLE
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
R
D
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
DOUB
L
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
R
O
A
D
DOUB
L
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
R
O
A
D
43
34
3635
41
42
45
343536
BLOCK 38
BLOCK 23
BLOCK 38
BLOCK 38
BLOCK 38PUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEYPUBLI
C
A
L
L
E
Y
PUBLIC ALLEY
44
33
29
30
31
32
COMMON
AREA 40
COMMON
AREA 39
40
39
38
37
COMMON
AREA 35
PARKLAND CC
DURHAM DRIVEAMISTAD LOOP
BLOCK 23
PARKLAND
BB
PARKLAND
AA
PARKLAND BB
2728
26
COMMON
AREA 37
3456
21
13
20
12
19
11
18
10
COMMON
AREA 36
17
9
16
8
15
7
14
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
PHASE 406A
PHASE 406B
LEGEND
LEGEND
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 04Page 36 of 338
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
BLOCK 4
BLOCK
20
BLOCK
21
BLOCK
22
BLOCK
23
BLOCK
23
BLOCK
6
BLOCK
6
BLOCK
5
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
24
BLOCK
5
BLOCK 22
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MINERAL WELLS LANETOLEDO BEND DRIVEPUBLIC ALLEY
PUBLIC ALLEY
AMISTAD LOOPGRANGER LANE AMISTAD LOOPTOWN LAKE DRIVEDOUB
L
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
R
O
A
D
AMISTAD LOOP
TOLEDO BEND DRIVE
7
11
COMMON AREA 2
6
12
5
13
4
14
3
COMMON AREA 3
15
2
PARKLAND Y
11
1
1
10
2
9
3
8
4
7
5
6
1
6
5
7
4
8
3
9
2
10
1
11
1
1098
24
7
46
6
1
5143
4
2
16
43
25
15
42
26
14
5
27
13
41
28
12
6
11
29
40
PARKLAND M
30
7
31
10
39
32
9
8
33
8
38
7
9
6
37
5
10
4321
2
24
43
22
8
8
23
16
5
21
10
6
20
9
7
19
8
18
4
17
7
16
6
15
5
14
3
PARKLAND D
2
13
12
PARKLAND CCOMMON AREA 1
PARKLAND N
COMMON AREA 26
23
22
21
20
2
19
45
18
3
17
44
COMMON AREA 27 & PAE
1213
34 36 37
35
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
253326342735283629303132
BLOCK 23
BLOCK 38
24
MURR LANEAMIST
A
D
L
O
O
P
PUBLIC ALLEY
PUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEY
14
COMMON AREA 33
PARKLAND AA
COMMON
COMMON
AREA 34
BLOCK 23
PARKLAND
BB
PARKLAND
AA
BLOCK 38
PUBLI
C
A
L
L
E
Y
PUBLIC A
L
L
E
Y
38
PARKLAND BB
27
24
25
26
1
234
212019
COMMON
AREA 38
2322
PHASE 406B
PHASE 406A
PHASE 406C
PHASE 406A
LEGEND
LEGEND
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 05Page 37 of 338
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEBLOCK
6
BLOCK
6
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
5
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
5
BLOCK
4
BLOCK
5
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MINERAL WELLS LANE
TOLEDO BEND DRIVETOLEDO BEND DRIVE
PUBLIC ALLEY
PUBLIC ALLEY
DOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
BLOCK 4
31
16
29
18
30
17
28
COMMON AREA 13
& PUE
19
39
27
20
26
21
25
22
24
23
232221201918
51
17
68
16
69
15141312COMMON AREA 8
& PAE11
38
10
37
9
36
49
3836
32
3731
33
38
34
35
9
COMMON AREA 7
& PAE
34
35
37
33
10
39
32
36
40
28
11
41
30
COMMON AREA 6
& PAE
42
29
COMMON AREA 9
& PAE
43
26
50
35
44
27
12
45
COMMON AREA 5
& PAE
34
46
24
13
25
33
14
23
32
15
40
41
42
43
44
PARKLAND C
45
46
47
48
5552
70
53 54 5756 5958 60 61 62 63 64 676566
1
COMMON AREA 43
1.10 ACRES
COMMON
AREA 16
LEGEND
LEGEND
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 06Page 38 of 338
BLOCK
36 BLOCK
37
BLOCK
37
BLOCK
36
BLOCK
37
6
7
4
3
2
1
1
9
7
5
10
11
12
13
CALAVERAS
COURTCALAVERAS COURTCOMMON
ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD HARRIS DRIVE14
10
3
4 BRADLEY ROAD11
COMMON AREA 31C
OMM
O
N
A
R
E
A
3
2
A
N
D
A
C
C
E
S
S
W
A
Y
8 TEXANA DRIVEDOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD6
9
8
COMM
O
N
A
R
E
A
2
2
2
5PHASE 109
PHASE 109
LEGEND
LEGEND
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 07Page 39 of 338
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE MATCHLINEMATCHLINEBLOCK 25
BLOCK 26
BLOCK 28
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
DOUBL
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
R
O
A
D
DURHAM DRIVEDOROTHY LANE
1 1
LEGEND
LEGEND
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 08Page 40 of 338
LEGEND
LEGEND
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE MATCHLINEMATCHLINEBLOCK
1
BLOCK
2
BLOCK
3
BLOCK
7
BLOCK
17
BLOCK
18
BLOCK
19 BLOCK
3
BLOCK
2
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 30
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
TOLEDO BEND DRIVETOWN LAKE DRIVEDOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
PUBLIC ALLEY
TOLEDO BEND
DR
IVETOWN L
A
KE
DRI
VE
DOUBL
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
R
O
A
D
AMISTAD LOOPAMISTAD LOOPDOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
DOROTHY LANE DOROTHY LANEMURR LANEMURR LANECOMMON AREA 3
1
1
1
PARKLAND A
PARKLAND J
14
PARKLAND K
15
PARKLAND O3
7
13
13
89
12
10
11
11
14
11
12
12
13
16
14
15
16
COMMON
AREA 14
PARKLAND L
15
6
17
PARKLAND F
18
19
17
20
21
14
22
12
2
16
3
15
10
4
139
5
11
6
8
9
7
PARKLAND E
8
8
10
3
7
PARKLAND O2
8
4
7
6
1
6
5
5
5
4
2
4
3
3
2
2
PARKLAND B
1
2
COMMON AREA 24
1
5
3
4
6
7
COMMON AREA 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
16
COMMON AREA 26
BLOCK 17
PARKLAND Z
COMMON AREA 28
BLOCK
17
PUBLIC ALLEYPUBLIC ALLEY24 COMMON
AREA 29B
MCQUEENY DRIVE
AREA 38
37
COMMON
AREA 41
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
43
38
39
40
41
42
46
44
45
COMMON
AREA 42
PHASE 404A
PHASE 404B
PHASE 106
PHASE 301
15731/206
PHASE 404C
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 09Page 41 of 338
LEGEND
LEGEND
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEBLOCK
BLOCK
8
BLOCK
9
BLOCK
9
BLOCK
10
BLOCK
11
BLOCK
7
BLOCK 8
BLOCK
11
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
BLOCK
11
BLOCK 11
BLOCK
10
BLOCK 12
BLOCK
9
BLOCK
37
BLOCK 12
BLOCK
10 COFFEE MILL
LANEKICKAPOO
LANETOLEDO BEND
DRIVELADY B
IRD
LANE
DOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROADDOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
DOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
FORK COURT
DOUBLE MOUNTAIN
ROAD
2
3
4
5
6
22
353
17
2
1
30
14
31
13
18
16
34
26
1
16
PARKLAND F
33
25
32
24
22
31
20
30
23
6
29
21
5
28
27
12
26
13
25
14
COMMON AREA 12 & PAE
24
17
15
23
21
3
4
20
2
15
18
16
19
17
5
31
18
19
32
4
1
30
6
29
25
7
28
24
8
27
23
9
26
10
25
24
11
23
12
13
22
14
21
15
20
1
16
16
17
15
1
18
14
2
19
13
28
12
3
11
4
10
27
9
19
5
8
18
26
7
17
6
6
16
25
5
15
7
4
COMMON AREA 11
& PAE
24
3
14
8
1
13
32
23
12
9
3311
22
34
10
10
35
9
21
36
8
11
37
7
20
38
6
12
39
5
19
4
13
2
18
1
29
14
37
28
17
36
27
15
GIBBO
N
S
W
A
Y
9
12
11
10
COMMON
AREA 21
8
7
PHASE 113PHASE 110
PHASE 109
PHASE 109
PHASE 109
PHASE 109
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 10Page 42 of 338
LEGEND
LEGEND
MATCHLINE
MATCHLINE
BLOCK
37
BLOCK
37
6
7
3
2
1 CALAVERAS COURT
COMMON
AREA 20
AND PrDE
3
4
C
OMM
O
N
A
R
E
A
3
2
A
N
D
A
C
C
E
S
S
W
A
Y
8
9
2
5PHASE 109
PHASE 109
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 11Page 43 of 338
LEGEND
LEGEND
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINECurb Ramp
Curb Ramp Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
BLOCK 26
BLOCK 35
591.94
Paver-BlockOut
PaverS
t
r
ip
BLOCK 29
M
I
D
T
OW
N
L
O
O
P
M
I
D
T
O
W
N
D
R
I
V
EDURHAM DRIVEMURR LANEDURHAM LOOPCOMMON AREA 30
2
6
5
4
3
11
7
14
13
12
8
9
10
1
1
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 12Page 44 of 338
LEGEND
LEGEND
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEBLOCK
1
BLOCK
1
BLOCK 34
BLOCK
3
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 30
BLOCK 31
PARK O1
TOLEDO BEND
DR
IVETOWN LAKE DRIVETOLEDO BEND
DR
IVE
MURR LANETOCO
D
E
R
O
A
D
PARKLAND Q
PARKLAND T
17
21
22
18
19
27
23
20
26
22
17
25
21
COMMON AREA 15
PrDE & PAE
24
22
21
20
2
1
1
31
30
29
28
23
18
24
19
7
6
5
4
3
4
5A
6
1
PARKLAND O1
5B
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 13Page 45 of 338
LEGEND
LEGEND
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEBLOCK
7
BLOCK 34
BLOCK 13
BLOCK
3
BLOCK 15
BLOCK 14
BLOCK
11
BLOCK 15
BLOCK
14
BLOCK
16
BLOCK 12
BLOCK 16
BLOCK 13
BLOCK 13
TOLEDO BEND
DR
IVE
GIBBO
N
S
W
A
Y
L
A
D
Y
B
I
R
D
L
A
N
E
LIVIN
G
S
T
O
N
D
R
I
V
E
29
24
28
12
27
23
26
PARKLAND X
13
PARKLAND G
25
22
24
14
21
28
15
27
20
26
16
25
19
17
18
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
10
21
22
23
24
25
7
6
5
4
21
20
22
23
10
32
10
9
23
22
9
22
COMMON
AREA 23
AND PUE
23
8
8
21
24
7
20
20
6
19
19
18
18
17
11
17
16
12
16
15
15
14
13
12
43
42
41
12
40
11
14
1
13
14
12
1
27
13
2
12
9
24
3
26
4
32
10
10
5
50
31
25
6
30
11
7
23
22
21
9
8
20
7
19
6
18
5
17
4
16
2
3
4
19
5
20
COMMON AREA 10
PrDE & PAE
6
21
7
19
2
8
3
9
10
31
30
29
28
48
COMMON AREA 18 & PAE
49
45
46
47
8
11
15 44
11 COFFEE MILL LANECOFFEE MILL COURT
T
O
L
E
D
O
B
E
N
D
D
R
I
V
E
T
O
L
E
D
O
B
E
N
D
D
R
I
V
E
KI
C
K
A
P
O
O
L
A
N
E
PHASE 110
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 14Page 46 of 338
LEGEND
LEGEND
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEBLOCK 33 Paver-Bloc
kOu
t
TOWN LAKE DRIVE
PARKLAND U
1
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 15Page 47 of 338
LEGEND
LEGEND
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINECurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb Ramp
Curb RampCurb Ramp
Curb RampCurb Ramp
BLOCK
1
BLOCK 32
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
M
I
D
T
O
W
N
D
R
I
V
E
TOWN LAKE DRIVETOWN LAKE DRIVETOWN LAKE DRIVE
PARKLAND V
PARKLAND W
PARKLAND U
32
2
3
36
COMMON AREA 17 & PAE7
PARKLAND R
1
PARKLAND S
35
34
33PHASE 301
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 16Page 48 of 338
LEGEND
LEGEND
MATCHLINEMATCHLINE
MATCHLINEBLOCK
1
BLOCK
15
29
25
26
27
28
17
20
18
1944
16
41 15
40
14
13
12
11
10
36
COMMON AREA 17 & PAE
37 38 39
1
42
43
COMMON AREA 18 & PAE
PARKLAND H
PHASE 115
Parcel Table
Parcel #
COMMON AREA 1
COMMON AREA 2
COMMON AREA 3
COMMON AREA 4
COMMON AREA 5
COMMON AREA 6
COMMON AREA 7
COMMON AREA 8
COMMON AREA 9
COMMON AREA 10
COMMON AREA 11
COMMON AREA 12
COMMON AREA 13
COMMON AREA 14
COMMON AREA 15
COMMON AREA 16
COMMON AREA 17
COMMON AREA 18
COMMON AREA 20 AND PrDE
COMMON AREA 21
COMMON AREA 22
PHASE
200
102
102
100
102
102
104
104
104
106
106
105
105
107
107
112
108
108
109
110
109
BLOCK
23
4
4
2
4
5
6
6
5
7
8
8
4
1
3
4
1
1
37
11
36
AREA (AC.)
0.045
0.069
0.009
0.010
0.038
0.038
0.038
0.038
0.038
0.051
0.051
0.051
0.131
0.437
0.032
0.070
0.026
0.031
6.519
0.098
0.266
Parcel Table
Parcel #
PARKLAND A
PARKLAND AA
PARKLAND B
PARKLAND BB
PARKLAND C
PARKLAND CC
PARKLAND D
PARKLAND E
PARKLAND F
PARKLAND G
PARKLAND H
PARKLAND I
PARKLAND J
PARKLAND K
PARKLAND L
PARKLAND M
PARKLAND N
PARKLAND O1
PARKLAND O2
PARKLAND O3
PARKLAND P
PARKLAND Q
PARKLAND R
PARKLAND S
PARKLAND T
PARKLAND U
PARKLAND V
PARKLAND W
PARKLAND X
PARKLAND Y
PARKLAND Z
PHASE
100
406A
100
406B
102
406B
102
103
106
107
114
404A
200
200
200
201
200
301
301
301
403
401
304
305
302
602
602
701
114
406A
404A
BLOCK
2
23
3
38
4
23
4
1
3
3
15
17
17
17
17
23
23
1
1
1
30
31
1
1
1
33
32
32
15
23
17
AREA (AC.)
0.545
0.443
2.182
0.452
2.186
0.062
0.456
0.113
1.523
2.338
4.756
0.021
0.619
0.285
0.376
0.364
1.391
0.317
0.250
0.044
0.609
0.840
6.736
2.052
0.910
0.542
0.541
0.763
1.783
0.630
0.115
Parcel Table
Parcel #
COMMON AREA 23
COMMON AREA 24
COMMON AREA 26
COMMON AREA 27
COMMON AREA 28
COMMON AREA 29A
COMMON AREA 29B
COMMON AREA 30
COMMON AREA 31
COMMON AREA 32 AND ACCESS WAY
COMMON AREA 33
COMMON AREA 34
COMMON AREA 35
COMMON AREA 36
COMMON AREA 37
COMMON AREA 38
COMMON AREA 39
COMMON AREA 40
COMMON AREA 41
COMMON AREA 42
COMMON AREA 43
PHASE
114
200
201
201
404B
404A
404A
601
109
109
406A
406A
406A
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
404B
404B
115
BLOCK
14
17
23
23
17
17
17
35
0
36
22
23
23
38
38
38
38
38
17
17
38
AREA (AC.)
0.047
0.011
0.012
0.038
0.018
0.109
0.112
2.000
0.068
0.177
0.023
0.021
0.009
0.020
0.017
0.013
0.021
0.019
0.018
0.023
1.101
TOTAL : 34.244 ACRES
PHASE
108
108
108
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
BLOCK
34
34
34
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
LOT
13
14
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
AREA (SF)
4,471
4,401
4,400
16,486
11,034
9,200
10,231
13,042
9,640
9,600
9,533
17,373
11,759
9,191
8,807
9,952
9,731
10,171
14,819
8,901
9,200
9,200
9,192
10,140
11,884
11,931
11,000
11,831
7,252
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,887
5,319
6,759
6,502
4,505
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
PHASE
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
BLOCK
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
16
16
16
16
16
LOT
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
2
3
4
5
AREA (SF)
4,400
4,400
4,644
4,737
4,737
4,737
4,737
4,515
4,415
4,403
5,507
4,800
4,800
4,800
5,537
6,433
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,550
4,804
5,011
8,500
5,839
4,399
4,399
4,398
4,398
4,397
4,397
4,432
4,731
4,920
5,114
5,181
5,116
4,928
6,235
4,800
4,800
4,800
4,800
4,800
5,518
6,897
4,741
4,741
4,741
4,659
PHASE
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
113
BLOCK
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
9
LOT
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
18
AREA (SF)
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
5,635
5,969
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,200
6,848
8,160
5,557
4,394
4,288
4,944
4,950
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
5,181
7,322
7,139
5,131
4,823
4,600
4,461
4,404
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,399
4,341
6,167
4,913
PHASE
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
BLOCK
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
LOT
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
AREA (SF)
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,744
4,520
4,400
4,659
4,771
4,963
5,344
8,203
8,344
5,168
5,037
5,159
5,220
5,132
4,776
4,632
4,891
4,405
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,906
5,539
4,740
4,740
4,550
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
5,290
4,880
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,557
4,798
5,015
5,158
PHASE
113
113
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
BLOCK
16
16
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
LOT
24
25
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
AREA (SF)
5,159
5,931
4,438
4,404
4,404
4,403
4,403
4,402
4,402
4,401
4,401
4,980
11,351
3,962
4,427
4,839
4,831
4,822
4,814
4,806
4,400
4,400
5,035
4,800
4,800
4,800
6,046
5,200
5,200
5,200
5,200
5,200
5,200
5,200
5,200
6,044
4,599
4,686
4,489
4,810
7,633
7,107
6,575
7,298
9,759
9,925
4,994
4,400
4,400
PHASE
114
114
114
114
114
114
115
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
BLOCK
15
15
15
15
15
15
4
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
22
22
22
22
LOT
24
25
26
27
28
29
70
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
AREA (SF)
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
5,798
163,248
4,581
4,799
5,073
5,043
4,883
5,341
4,460
4,411
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,306
4,449
4,400
4,950
4,400
4,400
7,002
4,409
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
5,064
4,526
4,200
4,200
4,200
4,200
4,200
4,200
5,650
4,907
4,400
4,400
4,873
PHASE
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
BLOCK
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
24
24
24
LOT
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1
2
3
AREA (SF)
4,873
4,400
4,400
4,438
4,669
4,934
5,152
5,633
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
5,550
5,817
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
5,735
4,125
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
3,999
4,007
4,306
4,424
4,226
4,262
4,300
4,339
4,378
4,431
4,469
4,508
4,546
4,585
4,623
4,397
6,370
4,400
4,400
PHASE
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
201
301
301
301
301
302
302
302
303
401
402
403
403
404A
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
404B
406C
BLOCK
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
31
29
28
30
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
22
LOT
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
4
5A
5B
6
1
2
3
7
1
1
1
1
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
12
AREA (SF)
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
5,444
5,444
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
5,390
116,277
55,122
37,659
388,646
54,067
106,137
261,633
57,226
163,729
257,356
153,189
144,387
36,773
1,539
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,550
7,748
PHASE
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406A
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
BLOCK
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
LOT
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AREA (SF)
2,678
1,592
1,534
1,863
1,859
1,501
1,501
1,859
1,859
1,501
1,501
1,859
1,859
1,501
1,501
1,859
1,859
1,501
1,501
2,323
1,872
1,925
1,925
1,925
1,925
1,925
1,650
1,650
1,650
1,650
1,650
1,650
1,650
1,551
1,650
1,650
2,059
2,088
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,830
2,466
1,954
1,915
1,903
1,892
1,845
1,800
PHASE
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
406B
501
601
601
601
601
601
601
601
601
601
601
601
601
601
601
602
701
BLOCK
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
28
28
28
28
28
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
26
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
33
32
LOT
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1
1
AREA (SF)
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,886
2,790
3,761
2,496
1,950
1,950
1,950
1,950
1,950
1,950
1,813
1,842
1,925
1,925
1,650
1,650
1,672
1,679
1,679
1,679
1,672
1,707
1,697
1,689
1,650
1,802
347,211
90,289
89,313
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
2,400
421,709
191,706
PHASE
105
105
105
105
105
105
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
BLOCK
9
9
9
9
9
9
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
LOT
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
AREA (SF)
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,541
3,996
4,400
4,637
4,400
4,929
5,297
5,509
5,111
4,588
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,505
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,896
4,604
5,645
5,842
4,399
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,271
5,454
4,703
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,913
4,912
4,400
4,400
PHASE
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
107
BLOCK
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
34
34
34
LOT
23
24
13
14
15
16
17
17
18
19
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
16
17
18
AREA (SF)
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,913
4,889
5,559
6,220
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,788
4,320
4,524
4,607
4,641
4,668
4,796
4,627
4,455
4,401
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,637
4,400
4,400
4,568
4,791
4,710
4,791
6,000
4,841
4,400
4,740
4,741
4,741
4,741
4,741
4,400
4,400
4,400
PHASE
107
107
107
107
107
107
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
BLOCK
34
34
34
34
34
34
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
LOT
19
20
21
22
23
24
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
AREA (SF)
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,392
4,783
5,582
5,611
5,248
5,218
5,669
5,887
5,419
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,734
5,765
7,059
6,765
5,372
5,454
5,499
4,609
4,400
5,588
5,012
6,399
8,231
6,698
5,172
4,780
4,853
5,269
7,530
4,308
4,556
4,650
4,739
4,829
4,919
5,009
5,098
5,060
6,012
9,044
PHASE
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
BLOCK
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
LOT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
AREA (SF)
3,794
4,418
4,509
4,685
4,946
5,296
5,740
6,350
7,208
7,588
4,723
4,288
4,124
4,043
4,043
5,811
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,398
4,736
4,960
4,640
4,400
4,400
4,204
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,401
4,585
4,668
4,402
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
PHASE
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
104
BLOCK
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
LOT
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
AREA (SF)
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,389
4,316
4,233
4,020
3,845
6,276
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
5,580
6,109
6,131
4,926
4,400
4,400
4,469
4,701
4,951
5,449
5,320
PHASE
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
BLOCK
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
LOT
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
13
14
15
AREA (SF)
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,557
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,208
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,374
6,134
4,026
4,322
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,857
4,400
4,400
4,400
PHASE
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
BLOCK
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
9
LOT
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
1
2
3
4
5
6
AREA (SF)
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
5,706
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,405
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,396
4,321
4,745
4,634
4,614
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,400
4,675
5,453
5,696
4,907
4,829
4,729
5,856
5,175
4,400
4,400
4,400
PHASE 301: 14.332 ACRES - 4 LOTS PHASE 402: 5.908 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 406A: 4.529 ACRES - 37 LOTS
PHASE 302: 10.606 ACRES - 3 LOTS PHASE 403: 9.680 ACRES - 2 LOTS PHASE 406B: 3.507 ACRES - 43 LOTS
PHASE 303: 1.314 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 404A: 1.983 ACRES - 1 LOTS PHASE 406C: 0.178 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 304: 6.724 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404B: 1.806 ACRES - 22 LOTS PHASE 501: 9.604 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 305: 2.052 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 404C: 0.360 ACRES - 0 LOTS PHASE 601: 6.782 ACRES - 14 LOTS
PHASE 401: 5.439 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 405: 7.186 ACRES - 1 LOT PHASE 602: 12.398 ACRES - 1 LOT
PHASE 701: 5.163 ACRES - 1 LOT
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown City Center
Subdivision: College Station
Town Center, Inc.
4121 S.H. 6 South, Suite 200
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 985-5610
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
PHASE 100: 7.367 ACRES - 26 LOTS (0.010 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 110: 11.738 ACRES - 78 LOTS (0.098 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 102: 11.192 ACRES - 62 LOTS (0.154 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 111: 3.127 ACRES - 21 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 103: 1.158 ACRES - 9 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 112: 2.617 ACRES - 19 LOTS (0.070 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 104: 5.364 ACRES - 36 LOTS (0.114 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 113: 7.746 ACRES - 52 LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 105: 10.417 ACRES - 69 LOTS (0.182 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 114: 15.031 ACRES - 53 LOTS (0.047 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 106: 8.667 ACRES - 50 LOTS (0.102 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 115: 5.143 ACRES - 1 LOT (1.101 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 107: 10.155 ACRES - 48 LOTS (0.469 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 200: 11.349 ACRES - 49 LOTS (0.056 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 108: 7.135 ACRES - 46 LOTS (0.057 ACRES C.A.)PHASE 201: 7.829 ACRES - 55 LOTS (0.050 ACRES C.A.)
PHASE 109: 16.911 ACRES - 25 LOTS (7.030 ACRES C.A.)
PRELIMINARY PLAN
MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION
142.946 ACRES - 699 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER SUBDIVISION
109.551 ACRES - 134 LOTS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Midtown Reserve Subdivision:
College Station Downtown
Residential, LLC
1645 Greens Prairie Road West, Ste, 204
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
REVISED
P:\23-084 Midtown Preliminary Plan - Documents\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Midtown PP.dwg, SHEET 17Page 49 of 338
October 5, 2023
Item No. 5.2.
Unlimited Potential PDD Rezoning
Sponsor: Gabriel Schrum
Reviewed By CBC: N/A
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending Appendix A , Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,”
Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development
District for approximately 2.805 acres located at 1115 Anderson Street, generally located at the
intersection of Anderson Street and Clement Street, east of Holleman Drive. Case #REZ2023-
000010 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the October 26th, 2023 City Council
Meeting – Subject to change).
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
Diverse & Growing Economy
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request and associated Concept
Plan. The rezoning request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and the requested
modifications and provided benefits help ensure compatibility with adjacent properties. In addition,
the additional landscape being proposed, along with streetscaping will limit any adverse impacts on
the adjacent properties. By zoning the property PDD and having the associated Concept Plan, it
further illustrates the location and details of the proposed use on the property.
Summary: This request is to change the existing zoning from GS General Suburban to PDD Planned
Development District with a base zoning of MF Multi-Family and associated Concept Plan on
approximately 2.8 acres. The applicant is requesting the following modifications to the base zoning
of MF:
• To reduce the minimum number of dwelling units per acre from the required 12, to 3.
• To reduce the parking requirements from one space per bedroom to one space for the first
bedroom and then 0.5 space for each additional bedroom. The current requirement for multi-
family is 1.5 spaces for one bedroom units and 1.0 space per bedroom for units with two or
more bedrooms.
The applicant is providing the following community benefits:
• Additional landscaping/streetscaping.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the subject as Urban
Residential. The Comprehensive Plan generally describes the Urban Residential land use
designation as follows:
Page 50 of 338
Urban Residential – Areas that are appropriate for a range of high-density multifamily and
attached residential development in various forms including townhomes, apartment buildings,
mixed-use buildings, and limited non-residential uses that are compatible with the surrounding
area
The proposed use of the property is defined as a “transition facility for foster youth in this community”;
which means the use of this property will not have the same amount of intensity of use as normal
multi-family developments. There will be less density overall and a reduced amount of automobile
trips as the applicant has explained the users of the property will likely not have vehicles. The
proposed lower-density use keeps the nature of this request aligned with the intent of Urban
Residential format, while also providing an appropriate service that is intended to directly serve foster
youth in the greater community. The property has direct access to Anderson Street with the single
proposed driveway aligned with Clement Court.
The MF Multi-Family zoning district is a generally appropriate district under the Urban Residential
land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The property takes its only access from Anderson Street. The use will have very limited vehicle
traffic consisting nearly entirely of foster youth and the employees. The small-scale multi-family use
being developed operates as transitional housing, which is compatible with the intention of Urban
Residential uses. Adjacent properties are zoned R-4 Multi Family to the north and west, D-Duplex to
the east, and GS- General Suburban to the south. The adjacent duplex properties to the east are
separated from this property by a channelized creek. Every adjacent property to the proposed
request is developed . Overall, the PDD’s land use and requested modifications make this proposed
transitional housing development appropriate in the context of the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject property is suitable for the proposed use of the property. The
property had one existing building, that has since been demolished. Drives, access, and parking are
all proposed and provided for on the associated concept plan. The improvements to be made on the
property are in the area noted on the attached concept plan, with the additional
landscape/streetscaping being provided.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the proposed
uses. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site development shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. A traffic impact analysis was not
required for the proposed request as the anticipated traffic volume falls below the threshold of 150
trips in the peak hour that would require a TIA to be performed.
5. The marketability of the property:
The proposed zoning district is generally marketable in this area.
Page 51 of 338
REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN
The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building areas as well
as other site related features. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also request variations to the
general platting and site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by
demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. This proposed Concept Plan allows
for a reduction of the number of required parking spaces Aswell as a reduced density per acre. The
applicant has in turn provided additional landscaping and streetscaping as community benefits to
help with meritorious modifications requested. This will help mitigate impacts the development may
have on the adjacent development and overall context to the area. The Unified Development
Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD Concept Plans.
1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the
character of the surrounding area;
2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan,
and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this
Section;
3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not
adversely affect adjacent development;
4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street
directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association;
5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited
to, parks, schools, and other public facilities;
6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or
pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the
proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land
uses in the area.
Purpose, Intent and Community Benefits:
The proposed Planned Development District for this property outlines the purpose, intent, and
community benefit of the proposed development, which is to provide a low-density multi-family
development of transitional housing for foster youth.
Base Zoning and Meritorious Modifications:
The proposed Planned Development District will have a base zoning of MF Multi-Family.
At the time of site plan, the project will need to meet all applicable site development standards and
platting requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance for the base zoning district, except
where meritorious modifications are granted with the PDD zoning. The applicant is requesting the
following modifications:
• Reduction to the minimum number of dwelling units to 3 units/acre based on Section 5.2 of the
UDO.
• Reduction of the parking ratio, one (1) parking space for the first bedroom and 0.5 spaces for
each additional bedroom based on Section 7.3.H of the UDO.
Community Benefits:
Page 52 of 338
The proposed concept plan will increase the landscaping and streetscaping amount by 30% more
than what is required.
The development will provide an additional 2 points per streetscape segment length along Anderson
Street, which will change the "points per streetscape segment length" from 6 to 8 and an additional
10 points per 1,000 sf of disturbed area for the site landscape points, which will change the site
landscape points from 30 points to 40 points per 1,000 sf of disturbed area.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2. Background Information
3. Applicant's Supporting Information
4. Rezoning Map
5. Existing Future Land Use Map
6. Concept Plan
Page 53 of 338
Page 54 of 338
Page 55 of 338
Page 56 of 338
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: October 5, 2023
Advertised Council Hearing Date: October 26, 2023
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
None
Property owner notices mailed: 27
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Urban Residential R-4 Multi-Family Multi Family
South Anderson St
(Major Collector) GS- General Suburban Anderson St
(Major Collector)
East Mixed Residential D- Duplex Duplex Residential
West Urban Residential R-4 Multi-Family Multi Family
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Incorporated: May, 1956
Zoning: GS General Suburban (upon annexation)
Final Plat: Un-platted
Site Development: Currently undeveloped; was previously assisted living facility
Page 57 of 338
Name of Project: UNLIMITED POTENTIAL - REZONING (REZ2023-000010)
Address: 1115 ANDERSON ST
Legal Description: A000701, CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL), TRACT 146, 2.805 ACRES
Total Acreage: 2.799
Applicant: SCHULTZ ENGINEERING
Property Owner: A HOMEBASE FOR TRANSITIONING F
List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change
necessary.
There is demand for a transition facility for foster youth in this community. This zoning change would allow for
a low density multi-family facility to accommodate the need.
Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
explain why the Plan is incorrect.
The Comprehensive Plan shows this area to be urban residential. This low density multi-family PD is
appropriate for this land use
How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby
property and with the character of the neighborhood?
The current zoning is single family residential which is not compatible with the adjacent land uses, and does
not allow for the low density multi-family development.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
Multi-family PD will provide a transition from the more urban adjacent developments to the single-family
subdivision. It will also provide a home base for transitioning foster youth.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
Multi-family PD will provide a transition from the more urban adjacent developments to the single-family
subdivision. It will also provide a home base for transitioning foster youth.
REZONING PDD APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Page 1 of 3
Page 58 of 338
Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
The current zoning is single family residential which is not compatible with the adjacent land uses, and does
not allow for the low density multi-family development.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
The community needs a location for a transition facility for foster youth. This rezoning will allow this to
happen.
Maximum Building Height.
Building height will be per multi-family zoning requirements.
Proposed Drainage.
The proposed stormwater runoff will function similar to today. The proposed impervious cover will be less than
or equal to the previous development on this tract.
Variations Sought.
ā0,1':(//,1*81,76$&5( *5266'(9(/230(17 3 UNITS / ACRE.
ā3$5.,1*5$7,221( 1) PARKING SPACE FOR THE FIRST BEDROOM AND 0.5 SPACES FRO EACH
ADDITIONAL BEDROOM.
Community Benefits.
The community needs a location for a transition facility for foster youth. This rezoning will allow this to
happen.
Sustained Stability.
Multi-family PD will provide a transition from the more urban adjacent developments to the single-family
subdivision. It will also provide a home base for transitioning foster youth.
Page 2 of 3
Page 59 of 338
Conformity.
The Comprehensive Plan shows this area to be urban residential. This low density multi-family PD is
appropriate for this land use
Compatibility with use.
This use will transition from the adjacent Multi-family development to the adjacent duplex development.
Access to Streets.
Access will be to Anderson Street via Driveway.
Public Improvements.
This development will provide common open space for residents to congregate.
Public Health.
The development will be constructed in accordance with City of College Station codes and ordinances and will
not be detrimental to the public health safety or welfare.
Safety.
his development will fit with the planned uses for the area and will not be an adverse impact.
Page 3 of 3
Page 60 of 338
Page 61 of 338
Page 62 of 338
ANDER
S
O
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
CLEMENT CTHOLIK DR·
·
·
·
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
AND
E
R
S
O
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
CLE
M
EN
T
CT
PINE RI
D
GE
D
R
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
www
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:
CONCEPT PLAN
UNLIMITED POTENTIAL
2.799 ACRES
CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE SURVEY, A-7
1115 ANDERSON STREET
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
SCALE: AS SHOWN
AUGUST 2023
OWNER:
A Homebase for Transitioning
Foster Youth, Inc.
3708 E 29th St.
Bryan, TX 77802
DEVELOPER:
Unlimited Potential, Inc.
3708 E 29th St.
Bryan, TX 77802
SURVEYOR:
Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
TBPELS FIRM # 10018500
KERR JOB # 23-155
Page 63 of 338
October 5, 2023
Item No. 5.3.
Wellborn District Plan
Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development
Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan to amend the Wellborn Community Plan, to amend the
planning areas and future land use descriptions within Chapter 2. Distinctive Places, to amend the
Comprehensive Plan – Planning Areas Map, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Future Land Use
& Character Map, to amend the Comprehensive Plan – Functional Classification & Context Class
Map, and to amend associated maps in the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
including the Proposed Bicycle Facilities Map and the Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Map. Case
#CPA2023-000002. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 12, 2023, City
Council Meeting – subject to change.)
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
• Good Governance
• Financial Sustainability
• Core Services & Infrastructure
• Neighborhood Integrity
• Diverse & Growing Economy
• Improving Mobility
• Sustainable City
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval.
The Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board heard this item at their September 18, 2023
meeting and recommended 7-0 to approve.
Summary: The Wellborn District Plan, an important priority project from the FY23 PDS Plan of Work,
has been underway since January 2023. This item comes from Comprehensive Plan Action 2.2, to
prioritize and undertake detailed small area plans for priority areas. The Wellborn area has
experienced changed conditions in recent years and is facing continued development pressures for
growth. The Wellborn District Plan aims to create a cohesive district that reflects the residents’ vision
for the community, recognizes the unique character of Wellborn, and supports the overall vision of
College Station.
Staff engaged the community throughout the planning effort by hosting four working group meetings,
five area-wide meetings, and a virtual area-wide meeting, as well as a virtual engagement website to
gather community feedback. Additionally, staff coordinated with representatives from the Texas
Department of Transportation on the future widening of FM 2154 and its impact on the planning area.
City staff also worked internally to ensure the plan meets the needs of all departments and maintains
the City’s excellent services.
Background: The Wellborn District Plan is an updated planning effort built upon the Wellborn
Page 64 of 338
Community Plan’s foundation, which established a vision and planned for coordinated actions from
2013-2023. Updating this small area plan offered the opportunity to take a closer look at the Wellborn
area within the City of College Station, develop area-specific approaches to implementing the
Comprehensive Plan, and directly engage with residents on the future of their area.
This update covers a timeframe of 2023-2033 and serves as a statement of the Wellborn
community’s vision for the future. It provides goals and actions on a broad range of topics and
provides strategic direction to maintain the rural character of Wellborn while managing small-scale
growth and maintaining a high quality of life.
The area was annexed into the City of College Station in 2011. That process was contentious, and
the development of the original Wellborn Community Plan following annexation provided residents,
landowners, and business owners the opportunity to help shape the plan’s focus on preserving the
rural and historical character of Wellborn. The planning area for the 2013 plan, as well as this 2023
update, covers the annexed areas as well as adjacent properties that are under non-annexation
development agreements.
Staff will present the finalized Wellborn District Plan and associated changes for consideration and
possible recommendation by the Commission. The recommendations of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Advisory Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission will be provided to the City
Council during their October 12, 2023 meeting, where the plan and its associated changes will be
presented for adoption.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Wellborn District Plan
2. Chapter 2. Distinctive Places Redlines
3. Chapter 2. Distinctive Places
4. Planning Areas Map, from the Comprehensive Plan
5. Future Land Use & Character Map, from the Comprehensive Plan
6. Functional Classification & Context Class Map, from the Comprehensive Plan
7. Proposed Bicycle Facilities Map, from the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
8. Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Map, from the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Page 65 of 338
WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Adopted October 12, 2023
Page 66 of 338
2CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Contents
CHAPTER 1
Plan Foundation
CHAPTER 2
Distinctive Places
CHAPTER 3
Integrated Mobility
CHAPTER 4
Plan Implementation
APPENDIX A
Existing Conditions
APPENDIX B
Public Engagement Summary
5
11
18
27
31
53
Page 67 of 338
3CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
MAPS
Map 2.1: Future Land Use & Character Map Modifications
Map 3.1: Thoroughfare Plan Modifications
Map 3.2: Bicycle Plan Modifications
Map 3.3: Pedestrian Plan Modifications
Map A.1: Existing Land Use
Map A.2: Existing Zoning
Map A.3: Code Enforcement Case Density
Map A.4: Development Activity
Map A.5: Existing Thoroughfare Plan
Map A.6: Existing Bicycle Plan
Map A.7: Existing Pedestrian Plan
Map A.8: Crash Density
Map A.9: Water Service Areas
Map A.10: Wastewater Service Areas
Map A.11: Electric Service Areas
Map A.12: Floodplain
Contents
14
21
23
24
34
35
38
40
43
44
45
47
49
50
51
52
Page 68 of 338
4CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Wellborn District Boundary
Figure 1.2: Planning Process
Figure 2.1: Rural Community Concept
Figure 2.2: Central Sign Element Concept
TABLES
Table 4.1: Implementation Matrix
Table A.1: Code Enforcement Cases, 2012-2022
Table A.2: Development Activity, 2012-2022
Contents
6
7
16
16
30
37
39
Page 69 of 338
ADOPTED OCTOBER 12, 2023
The Wellborn District Plan is an updated planning effort built upon the Wellborn
Community Plan’s foundation, which established a vision and planned for coordinated
actions from 2013-2023. Updating this small area plan offers the opportunity to take
a closer look at the Wellborn area within the City of College Station, develop area-
specific approaches to implementing the Comprehensive Plan, and directly engage with
residents on the future of their area.
This update covers 2023-2033 and serves as a statement of the Wellborn community’s
vision for the future. It provides goals and actions on a broad range of topics and
provides strategic direction to maintain the rural character of Wellborn while
managing small-scale growth and maintaining a high quality of life.
In October 2033, on the 10-year anniversary of this plan’s adoption date, the plan is
officially retired and serves as a historical reference only. Subsequently, the City of
College Station can choose to analyze whether a renewed planning effort is warranted
or whether the goals of this plan have been satisfactorily implemented. Similarly, with
the adoption of this updated plan in 2023, the original Wellborn Community Plan is
retired and serves as a historical reference.
PLAN
FOUNDATION1
Page 70 of 338
6CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Planning Area
The Wellborn District is located in the southwestern portion of the city and includes much of what remains
of the historic Wellborn community. The planning area is made up of over 929 acres and is bounded by
I&GN Road, Victoria Avenue, Royder Rd, Barron Cut-off Road, and Capstone Drive as shown in Figure 1.1:
Wellborn District Boundary. This area includes a mix of ranch and acreage lots, with commercial uses
located along the primary thoroughfare (FM 2154). There are approximately 470 residents who live within
the planning boundary.
The area was annexed into the City of College Station in 2011. That process was contentious, and the
development of the original Wellborn Community Plan following annexation provided residents, landowners,
and business owners the opportunity to help shape the plan’s focus on preserving the rural and historical
character of Wellborn. The planning area for the 2013 plan, as well as this 2023 update, covers the annexed
areas and adjacent properties that are under non-annexation development agreements. In 2022, a small
area plan audit found that about 60% of the actions of the Wellborn Community Plan were completed.
Figure 1.1: Wellborn District Boundary
Page 71 of 338
7CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Plan Creation
RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The need to update the Wellborn Community Plan was identified by community members, City staff,
the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the City Council during the evaluation and adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan in 2021. Many participants of that process acknowledged continued development
pressures in the area and that small-scale growth in limited areas may be appropriate. The Comprehensive
Plan calls for the renewed planning effort in the Wellborn area and Comprehensive Plan Action 2.2
directs staff to prioritize and undertake detailed plans for priority neighborhoods, districts, corridors, or
redevelopment areas. The Wellborn District Plan update was identified as a high priority project by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. This is the second small area plan to be adopted
under the 2021 City of College Station Comprehensive Plan.
PLANNING PROCESS
In November 2022, City staff began compiling existing conditions data of the planning area to identify
changes in the area and trending conditions in preparation for the first public meetings. A key component
of plan creation is ensuring that the residents within the area are involved in developing the vision for the
planning area. Through this planning effort, residents were engaged multiple times between January and
August 2023. There were a total of six area-wide meetings for this planning effort, five of which were in-
person, and one was held virtually. Each meeting progressed further into the planning process and asked
residents to provide feedback on a range of topics.
The beginning phase included community visioning and brainstorming for the future of Wellborn. During
the Phase 1 meetings, participants were asked to evaluate the existing plan goal statements, the strengths
of the area that should be maintained, and any potential changes. One of the initial topics of concern was
the planning boundary. City staff analyzed a larger boundary than the original Wellborn Community Plan to
holistically assess the pressures placed on the community including traffic, congestion, housing density, and
demand for utilities. While the original boundary is being honored within this updated plan, residents within
and around the planning area participated in the planning effort, and all feedback was considered during
this plan update. There are a few established neighborhoods that border the Wellborn planning boundary –
Creek Meadows subdivision, Sweetwater Forest, and Estates at Royder to name a few.
City staff organized the Phase 1 comments into broader categories that helped inform the second phase of
public engagement, as well as revised the goals based on resident feedback. The Phase 2 meetings focused
on defining what rural character looks like within Wellborn, where different land uses should be located,
and began to draft actions that will help implement the goals. City staff hosted an additional meeting during
Phase 2 to focus on infrastructure within the district including water and wastewater provision and service
limitations, capital projects within the area, and the ongoing FM 2154 widening project being led by the
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT).
Page 72 of 338
8CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
While a separate project, the FM 2154 widening project was a topic of interest and concern to many
meeting participants throughout the first two rounds of public engagement. As such, City staff invited
TxDOT representatives to two area-wide meetings to provide more details about the widening project and
to hear directly from community members. City staff wrapped the first two phases of the planning effort by
conducting workshops with the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council to explain the process
and public input received thus far and ask for input and direction. The City Council directed staff to maintain
the original boundaries of the Wellborn plan based on public input.
The third and fourth stages of the planning effort involved proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan’s
Future Land Use & Character Map and Thoroughfare Plan, and the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways
Master Plan maps and testing those proposed changes with meeting participants. Staff then worked to
incorporate resident feedback and finalize the plan document and its associated map.
The final stage of this planning effort included
meetings with the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Advisory Board, the Planning and
Zoning Commission, and City Council. The
final plan was presented to the board and
commission for their recommendation. The
plan, along with the recommendations from the
board and commission, was forwarded to the
City Council for final adoption. After adoption,
plan implementation will occur over the planning
horizon through City investments in infrastructure
and programs, changes in regulations and
policies that support Wellborn’s rural character,
and private development decisions.
PROJECT TEAMS
Every planning effort requires coordination
between community members, stakeholders,
staff, and appointed and elected officials. This
planning effort engaged a working group of
volunteers, City staff, the Planning and Zoning
Commission, the City Council, and the general
public to build the plan’s vision, goals, and
actions. Members of the various project teams are
identified in the Acknowledgements at the end of
the plan.
Staff Resource Team
The Staff Resource Team consisted of representatives from each department within the City to shepherd
the plan and offer internal coordination opportunities. The Staff Resource Team met after each phase of the
project to talk through any new information or decisions and confirm the roadmap for the next phase of the
project.
Page 73 of 338
9CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Planning & Development Services Resource Team
The Planning & Development Services Resource Team was comprised of staff from each of the divisions
within the Planning & Development Services department to provide periodic updates and prepare for
meetings with the Staff Resource Team and Working Group. This team met every other month in addition to
bi-weekly check-ins on progress.
Working Group
The Working Group was a group of individuals who volunteered to help City staff determine the direction
of the plan and provide more focused input throughout its creation. The group was comprised of 37
property and business owners and residents within or around the planning area. Participants learned about
small-area planning, offered direction on specific components of the plan, and served as ambassadors for
the project in their community circles. The group met four times during the planning process to provide
guidance to staff and feedback in advance of the area-wide meetings. This group also helped to advocate
for the original Wellborn community and its history.
Page 74 of 338
10CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Plan Goals & Structure
The Wellborn District Plan is of interest to community residents, investors, developers, business owners,
and others interested in how the district will respond and adapt over the next 10 years. The plan is divided
into topic-based chapters that each contain a specific goal, corresponding actions, narrative, and maps that
provide direction to realize the community’s vision.
CHAPTER 1: PLAN FOUNDATION
The first chapter details the history and context of the plan area and provides an overview of the planning
process and the public participation opportunities.
CHAPTER 2: DISTINCTIVE PLACES
GOAL: Preserve the core rural character of Wellborn with small-scale growth that
enhances the uniqueness and history of the area.
This chapter establishes planning strategies for future small-scale growth and appropriate development
while balancing the community’s desire to maintain the rural roots of the Wellborn area.
CHAPTER 3: INTEGRATED MOBILITY
GOAL: Promote a safe, efficient,
and connected mobility system that
encourages transportation options while
recognizing the lower density of the
district.
This chapter ensures the development of a
cohesive and context-sensitive mobility network
for all users within the district. This includes
contextually appropriate integration of shared-
use paths, road connections, and other changes
identified through the planning process.
CHAPTER 4: PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
The final chapter establishes accountability for the
execution of this plan and guides the necessary
processes that come with plan implementation.
It collates the plan actions from the previous
chapters and identifies implementation priorities
and strategies.
Page 75 of 338
11CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
GOAL
Preserve the core rural character of Wellborn with small-scale growth that enhances
the uniqueness and history of the area.
DISTINCTIVE
PLACES2
Page 76 of 338
12CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Purpose
This chapter provides guidance for the preservation of the rural character of the Wellborn District. Future
development within the area should fit within the established community vision for limited growth in
appropriate areas that enhance the historic, rural feel of the community. The Wellborn District Plan
accomplishes this by retooling the Wellborn zoning districts as design districts that enhance the rural
character and further identifies opportunities for improvements that the City can implement in tandem
with private development decisions. Input from the district’s residents and business owners identified a
desire to preserve the natural and historical features of the original Wellborn community while also allowing
small-scale development opportunities. Therefore, this plan places a high priority on maintaining the rural
character of the district.
Community Preservation
& Design
The historic Wellborn area dates to before the
City of College Station was established. While
most historical sites have been demolished over
the years, there is a desire from the community
to capture and highlight the community’s roots.
Effective design helps to create places of distinction
– places worth remembering and protecting – and
contributes significantly to the quality of life.
During the public engagement for this plan,
participants expressed a desire to maintain larger
residential lots to preserve the natural open space
within the community as well as commercial
buildings that have a unified design representative
of the original ranch and homestead-style
architecture seen within the area. This character has
been captured through the Wellborn zoning districts
that were established in 2016 after the adoption
of the Wellborn Community Plan. These zoning
districts are described in further detail later in this
chapter. After hearing concerns from participants
regarding certain aspects of the current zoning
districts, this planning effort identified that the
Wellborn zoning districts should become a design
district within the Unified Development Ordinance
(UDO), which could further require certain design
elements for buildings within the planning boundary.
Plan participants also made several comments
about property owners not following municipal
codes. A design district helps with community
place-making and builds cohesion. Combining the
design district with additional educational efforts
increases the likelihood of compliance with the
City’s standards.
Page 77 of 338
13CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Future Land Use
Future land use serves as a guide for how all property within the city may develop in the future. Each future
land use category contains a character-based description and overall intent of the category, along with
generally appropriate zoning districts that help achieve the desired character.
In determining appropriate land use classifications, the existing land use and character were considered.
The planning processes included discussions that prompted participants to identify land uses they would
like to see within the planning boundary. The result of those discussions is the proposed modifications to
the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map listed below and shown visually within Map
2.1: Future Land Use & Character Map Modifications.
FUTURE LAND USE MODIFICATIONS
After the adoption of the Wellborn Community Plan in 2013, ten future land uses were created and
implemented for the Wellborn planning area. In subsequent years, many stakeholders – including residents,
business owners, developers, staff, and appointed and elected officials alike – noted that the granular level
of Wellborn future land use categories was overly specific and unintentionally functioned in a “pre-zoning”
fashion, requiring that most zoning change requests also involve a future land use change request. During
the 2021 update to the Comprehensive Plan, there were no changes to the Wellborn future land uses, as this
planning effort was anticipated to begin shortly after the updated Comprehensive Plan was adopted.
With the adoption of this Wellborn plan update, the modifications help align the future land uses categories
to other parts of College Station and the City’s updated Comprehensive Plan. The future land uses within
the Wellborn District now include Neighborhood Commercial, Suburban Residential, Estate Residential,
Rural, Business Center, Institutional/Public, and Natural & Open Areas. These are represented visually in
Map 2.1 Future Land Use & Character Map Modifications, and the category descriptions and associated
zoning district(s) that are generally appropriate are found within the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
In addition to the map edits, there are revised future land use category descriptions within the
Comprehensive Plan to better embrace the Wellborn area and its desired rural character. The edits include
indicating that only the Wellborn zoning districts – WC Wellborn Commercial, WRS Wellborn Restricted
Suburban, and WE Wellborn Estate – as well as the BP Business Park, BPI Business Park Industrial, CI
Commercial Industrial, R Rural, and NAP Natural Areas Protected zoning districts are permitted zoning
districts within the Wellborn District boundary. The specificity for Wellborn-only zoning controls remains
and is embodied within the Wellborn zoning districts, which will be retooled into a Wellborn design district
as an action within this plan.
Page 78 of 338
[INSERT MAP 2.1: FUTURE LAND USE & CHARACTER MAP MODIFICATIONS – 11X17 PAGE SPREAD]
Future Land Use
& Character Map
Modifications
WELLBORN
DISTRICT
FM 2154FM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
RD
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEE
TT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWE
T
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL
ESTATE RESIDENTIAL
RURAL
NATURAL & OPEN AREAS
INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC
PARKS & GREENWAYS
MAP 2.1
BUSINESS CENTER
Page 79 of 338
15CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Zoning
The Wellborn Community Plan called for the creation of several zoning districts specifically for the Wellborn
area. This led to the creation of three zoning districts: WC Wellborn Commercial, WRS Wellborn Restricted
Suburban, and WE Wellborn Estate. While the Wellborn Community Plan also called for the creation of
additional zoning districts, such as Wellborn Business Park, other citywide zoning districts were created
and determined to meet the goals of the Wellborn Community Plan as well as the needs of the city as a
whole.
As of the writing of this plan, the Wellborn zoning districts are all being
utilized in the Wellborn District. However, there are also zoning districts
present in the planning area that are not Wellborn-specific districts;
most of these properties were zoned before the creation of the Wellborn
zoning districts in 2016. Additionally, when an area is annexed into the City
of College Station it is automatically designated as R Rural, regardless
of the existing or future land use. As much of this district has not been
redeveloped since the area was annexed in 2011, most of the land within
the planning area still reflects the R Rural zoning designation.
As mentioned, this updated plan and the associated revisions to the
Comprehensive Plan and its Future Land Use & Character Map will
continue to support the need for Wellborn-specific zoning districts and will
incorporate them into a Wellborn design district as an action in this plan.
District Image Corridors & Gateways
IMAGE CORRIDORS
Image corridors are predominantly found on routes that many residents and visitors travel and can have
a great impact on the character of the surrounding area. Within the Wellborn District, FM 2154 serves as
the primary image corridor due to the high volume of individuals who use this roadway daily. Landscaping,
streetscaping, decorative markers, and themed wayfinding signs should be uniformly utilized within this
corridor to further enhance the character of the district.
During the creation of the original Wellborn Community Plan, residents, property owners, and business
owners participated in a design workshop to help visualize the rural character and history of Wellborn. With
the community created around the Union Pacific railroad location, participants felt it was a key component
that should be utilized in the creation of any identifying features to ensure that the rustic country feel was
not lost. Those sentiments were identical during the plan update process.
The results of the design workshop focused on creating a more pedestrian-friendly, village-type
environment with small-scale businesses located along Live Oak Street, as shown in Figure 2.1: Rural
Community Concept. Of note was the desire to have existing and new businesses still generally front
toward FM 2154 and the railroad, but to incorporate side streets, front and rear building access, and to avoid
having continuous backs of buildings along the primary thoroughfare of the community. As mentioned,
participants a decade ago and today expressed a desire to embrace the community’s rural roots and
history with the railroad. The vision to reorient toward Live Oak Street remains within this updated plan.
Plan actions such as revising the land uses, extending Live Oak Street to connect to McCullough Road,
and revising and implementing design district standards will help realize this vision for a new “main street”
within the Wellborn community.
Page 80 of 338
16CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
GATEWAYS
The Wellborn District acts as the southwestern gateway into the city where visitors have a first glimpse
of College Station and the district’s identity. Participants identified that they would like elements, such as
street sign toppers and wayfinding signs, to establish a unified feel and sense of place within the district.
Identifying features for gateway elements should
incorporate items that reflect the rural and railroad
history of Wellborn such as railroad ties, fences, and
hitching posts.
Primary gateway elements should be placed generally
around the Barron Cut-Off Road and FM 2154
intersection, and south of the Greens Prairie Road and
FM 2154 intersection. To tie the gateway and identifying
elements together, unified plantings that lead from the
gateway elements to the central point of the community
should be utilized. Ultimately, these could lead to a
larger sign element that could be placed within the
core of the community, generally located around the
Post Office. This sign element could convey historical
information about Wellborn and be used as a central
gathering place. This was visually represented during
the Wellborn Community Plan’s creation, as shown in
Figure 2.2: Central Sign Element Concept.
Figure 2.1: Rural Community Concept
Figure 2.2: Central Sign Element Concept.
Page 81 of 338
17CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Strategic Actions
DP.1 Amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map and corresponding
categories to incorporate the recommended modifications for Wellborn. This includes retiring
the prior Wellborn land uses, assigning future land uses as determined through this planning process,
and revising the appropriate future land use categories to specify where the Wellborn-specific zoning
districts are the only zoning districts allowed within the plan boundary.
DP.2 Retool the Wellborn zoning districts into a design district in the Unified Development
Ordinance. To highlight the unique character of developments within the Wellborn District, the
Wellborn-specific zoning districts should be reworked into a design district. The zoning standards
should also be evaluated to determine if additional modifications are needed to enhance the rural
character of Wellborn.
DP.3 Create a village center around Live Oak Street to facilitate the area becoming the new
“main street” for the Wellborn District. Revising the future land uses, extending Live Oak Street
to connect to McCullough Road, implementing the revised design district standards and other
appropriate place making strategies will help realize the vision for a new “main street” one block away
from FM 2154. This change may also help spur additional small-scale commercial development along
Live Oak Street.
DP.4 Work with residents and business owners to assess the potential need, benefit, and
structure of creating a Wellborn District Association. A Wellborn District Association comprised
of local residents and business owners could collectively initiate actions to improve the Wellborn
District and coordinate local events. Having an association registered with the City facilitates
information sharing and courtesy notifications, including updates on development activity and City
projects within the district.
DP.5 Work with community stakeholders to create identification and gateway signage. These
placemaking features should have details that reflect the community’s rural context. Consider
including a central gateway element near the Post Office. City staff should collaborate with
stakeholders on funding and location opportunities for improvements that highlight the Wellborn
District identity.
DP.6 Create opportunities for residents and visitors to engage with the history of the Wellborn
District. This could also extend to a citywide scale to analyze the market needs for additional retail,
commercial, and hospitality uses throughout the community.
DP.7 Conduct enhanced outreach and educational efforts about local ordinances, Code
Enforcement, and the SeeClickFix program. To expand the spread of information and encourage
compliance with the Code of Ordinances, Code Enforcement officers could proactively share
educational materials or host workshops in the Wellborn District.
Page 82 of 338
18CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
GOAL
Promote a safe, efficient, and connected mobility system that encourages
transportation options while recognizing the lower density of the district.
INTEGRATED
MOBILITY3
Page 83 of 338
19CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Purpose
This chapter provides guidance for a contextualized mobility system in the Wellborn District that considers
the needs of all users. A safe, efficient, and connected mobility system addresses vehicular, bicycle, and
pedestrian movements within and through the area. The Wellborn District Plan accomplishes this by
providing a street network to meet the capacity of the area and designated off-street bicycle and pedestrian
facilities. During the public engagement for the plan, participants shared their desire for a mobility system
that supports appropriate densities, includes safe and well-connected infrastructure, and is more user-
friendly for all modes of mobility.
Thoroughfares
The Thoroughfare Plan within the Comprehensive Plan establishes a network of major streets comprised of
collectors, arterials, and freeways that include various bicycle and pedestrian facilities. It is one of the two
major planning components for the mobility system within the City of College Station. The Thoroughfare
Plan uses the future land use designations in the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map
to identify the future needs of the mobility system based on anticipated development patterns.
Page 84 of 338
20CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
FUTURE STREET NETWORK
The street network within the district consists of more than eight miles of existing streets with just over
0.5 miles of private streets. The future street network for the Wellborn District proposes one minor change
to the Thoroughfare Plan; otherwise, the existing road network in addition to the Thoroughfare Plan is
anticipated to be able to handle the needs of the planning area and surrounding area as they build out.
While the City of College Station builds and maintains many of the roads within the planning area, the Texas
Department of Transportation (TxDOT) collaborates with the City on plans, improvements, and maintenance
for Wellborn Road (Farm-to-Market Road 2154 or FM 2154). One of the major discussion points that came
up during the public engagement of this plan update was the FM 2154 widening project that was being
designed when the planning effort started. The existing FM 2154 is a two-lane rural highway with center
turn lanes in some areas and is proposed to be widened to be a 4 Lane Major Arterial. There were concerns
regarding this expansion, including the replacement of center turn lane areas with controlled left turns and
raised medians. Participants mentioned the potential impact on access to businesses along the corridor to
receive products and customers if there is not adequate access.
As a response to these concerns, City staff communicated resident concerns regarding the widening of the
corridor to TxDOT and collaborated with them to have TxDOT representatives at several public meetings,
empowering meeting participants to speak directly with TxDOT. The design of the corridor, at the time of
this plan, has not been completed and TxDOT is continuing to evaluate the design and interact with area
property owners and stakeholders to determine what revisions to the design may be needed.
MODIFICATIONS TO THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN
Small area planning efforts enable a closer look into an area’s needs and identify potential changes within
the Thoroughfare Plan. Based on participants' desire for a safe and well-connected roadway system, there
is one change to the Thoroughfare Plan, which is outside the plan boundary but will provide access for
people in and around the planning area. Currently, there is a proposed connection between McCullough
Road and Brewster Drive. However, there is only one planned north/south connection along McCullough
Road and Brewster Drive between FM 2154 and WS Phillips Parkway. Thus, a 2 Lane Minor Collector
connection is proposed between the proposed extension of McCullough Road and Brewster Drive and
Barron Cut-Off Road. This road would likely be constructed by the developer when the development of the
parcel occurs. This future connection to Barron Cut-Off Road will be the through movement of the Brewster
Drive extension and provide the suburban style development to the east of planning area an alternate route
to FM 2154 other than McCullough Road.
Page 85 of 338
[INSERT MAP 3.1: THOROUGHFARE PLAN MODIFICATIONS – 11X17 PAGE SPREAD]
Thoroughfare Plan
Modifications
FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY
PROPOSED FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY
6 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
PROPOSED 6 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
PROPOSED 4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
PROPOSED MINOR ARTERIAL
MAJOR COLLECTOR
PROPOSED MAJOR COLLECTOR
MINOR COLLECTOR
PROPOSED MINOR COLLECTORFM 2154FM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
OY
DER
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
L
AKE
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPS TO NE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
ILLIP
S
PK
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEETT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWET
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
SUBURBAN
RURAL
MAP 3.1
CONTEXT ZONES
Page 86 of 338
22CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities
The Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan is the other major
planning component for the mobility system within the City of College
Station. Written in 2010 and updated in 2018, the plan provides guidance for
and lays out improvements for bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout
College Station. The Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
identifies opportunities for improved connectivity for on- and off-street
facilities as roadway projects are pursued. Within the Wellborn Community
Plan (2013), there were several modifications made to the Bicycle,
Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan to reduce the number of bicycle
and pedestrian facilities to meet the citizen vision of rural section roadways.
The future facility network is comprised of more than 3 miles of existing on- and off-street bicycle facilities,
off-street shared-use paths, and sidewalks, with over 5 miles of proposed facilities. Several changes are
proposed by this plan to meet the needs of the planning area based on feedback received during the
planning effort.
MODIFICATIONS TO THE BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND GREENWAYS MASTER PLAN
Small area planning efforts enable a closer look into an area’s needs and identify potential changes within
the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. Through feedback received during the planning
effort, several changes to the bicycle and pedestrian facilities are proposed within the area as a part of this
planning effort.
First, the majority of changes relate to planned bicycle facilities (typically bicycle lanes) and planned
sidewalks being replaced with planned shared-use paths. Participants emphasized the desire for shared-
use paths rather than separate sidewalks and bicycle lanes to reduce the amount of paved area along
streets and maintain a more rural feel within the planning area. Shared-use paths enable pedestrian
connectivity options while reducing the impact to the rural character of the area. Due to the design of rural
roads, there would be more separation between pedestrians utilizing the shared-use paths and vehicles
utilizing the street which also addresses safety concerns of having pedestrian facilities close to the street.
The streets proposed to have a shared-use path are:
• I&GN Road from Rock Prairie Road West to Greens Prairie Road;
• South Dowling Road from I&GN Road realigned to the future Royder Road extension;
• Barron Cut-off Road from FM 2154 to WS Phillips Parkway;
• Victoria Avenue from FM 2154 to Woodlake Drive;
• Woodlake Drive from Victoria Avenue to Greens Prairie Road;
• Royder Road from Dymple Lane to FM 2154; and
• Greens Prairie Road from I&GN Road to FM 2154.
To provide additional connectivity to the existing system within and around the planning area, two new
shared-use paths are proposed to provide a more complete network. First, along with the improvements
to the FM 2154, TxDOT intends to construct a shared-use path. Adding this to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan acknowledges the new facility. Second, there is a new connection proposed along
McCullough Road to connect the shared-use path along FM 2154 to Live Oak Street and the extension of
Brewster Drive. Given the rural context, it is expected that a shared-use path would be provided only on one
side of these roadways. All of these changes to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan would
be constructed by development as it occurs or by the City through capital projects in the future.
Page 87 of 338
[INSERT MAP 3.2: BICYCLE PLAN MODIFICATIONS – 11X17 PAGE SPREAD]
Bicycle Plan
Modifications
BIKE LANE EXISTING
BIKE LANE FUNDED
BIKE FACILITY PROPOSED
BIKE ROUTE EXISTING
BIKE ROUTE PROPOSED
SHARED-USE PATH EXISTING
SHARED-USE PATH FUNDED
SHARED-USE PATH PROPOSED
GRADE SEPARATION EXISTING
GRADE SEPARATION FUNDED
GRADE SEPARATION PROPOSED
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJFM 2154FM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
W
O
O
D
LAK
E
DR
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CA PS TO NE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
YET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEE
TT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
YET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWE
T
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
MAP 3.2
Page 88 of 338
[INSERT MAP 3.3: PEDESTRIAN PLAN MODIFICATIONS – 11X17 PAGE SPREAD]
Pedestrian Plan
Modifications
SIDEWALK EXISTING
SIDEWALK FUNDED
SIDEWALK PROPOSED
SHARED-USE PATH EXISTING
SHARED-USE PATH FUNDED
SHARED-USE PATH PROPOSED
GRADE SEPARATION EXISTING
GRADE SEPARATION FUNDED
GRADE SEPARATION PROPOSED
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJFM 2154FM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
LA
KE
DR
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
ILL
IP
S
PK
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
NB
U
R
Y AV
E
SWSWEE
TT
DRDR
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWE
T
DR
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
MAP 3.3
Page 89 of 338
25CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Traffic Signal and Access Management
Several significant intersections manage the flow of traffic into and out of College Station along FM 2154,
one of College Station’s major gateway roads. Since the Wellborn Community Plan was adopted in 2013,
traffic along FM 2154 has steadily increased as more housing is developed south of College Station and
outside the City limits. Two new signalized intersections have been installed at FM 2154 and Royder Road
and FM 2154 and Greens Prairie Road. In addition, the City capital project to realign Capstone Drive to
Barron Road includes a traffic signal at FM 2154. As part of the design for the FM 2154 widening project,
TxDOT is evaluating other intersections along the corridor for potential improvements.
Encouraging local circulation through street connections away from FM 2154 can help to provide access
from side streets, minimize the need for curb cuts and driveway accesses near high-volume intersections,
and improve perceptions of access within the area. The presence of secondary streets and internal
connections can also support place-making in a rural context as local traffic is directed away from the 4
Lane Major Arterial and towards the local rural roadways.
The Wellborn community was established due to its proximity to the railroad. The Union Pacific Railroad
line that parallels FM 2154 can be traced back to 1867 and the old Houston and Texas Central Railroad.
Since the adoption of the Wellborn Community Plan in 2013, the City has been working toward establishing
a quiet zone along the Union Pacific Railroad. As capital projects along the railroad have been designed,
they have been designed to allow future establishment of a continuous railroad quiet zone. It has been
identified that the existing railroad crossing at Butte Drive may not be designed or modified to qualify as
a quiet zone, so to extend the quiet zone through the planning area, the crossing at Butte Drive may need
to be closed. However, this is the only public street entrance into the Shiloh subdivision currently. The City
should evaluate providing an alternative access point for the subdivision to enable the potential closure of
the railroad crossing at Butte Drive to allow the completion of a railroad quiet zone through the Wellborn
District.
Page 90 of 338
26CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Strategic Actions
IM.1 Add a new 2 Lane Minor Collector connection from the extension between McCullough Road
and Brewster Drive to Barron Cut-off Road. The connection between the extension of Brewster
Drive and McCullough Road and Barron Cut-Off Road provides a north/south thoroughfare parallel to
FM 2154.
IM.2 Revise various proposed sidewalks and bicycle facilities to shared-use paths. These changes
support the plan vision for a rural context mobility system while meeting the City’s goal of a safe and
connected multi-mobility network. These revisions are on I&GN Road, South Dowling Road, Barron
Cut-off Road, Victoria Avenue, Woodlake Drive, Royder Road, and Greens Prairie Road.
IM.3 Revise the proposed bicycle route to a shared-use path along I&GN Road. The shared-use
path meets the goals for a safer, off-street option for bicycling and walking and helps maintain the
rural road character for I&GN Road.
IM.4 Add a shared-use path along FM 2154. As the Texas Department of Transportation improves FM
2154, they intend to add a shared-use path along the project. Adding this to City plans acknowledges
the provided facility.
IM.5 Add a shared-use path along McCullough Road. Adding this shared-use path connects north/
south and east/west bicycle and pedestrian routes inside the plan boundary and to surrounding
areas.
IM.6 Extend Live Oak Street from its current terminus near Church Street to McCullough
Road. This facilitates Live Oak Street becoming a “main street” within the Wellborn District. It also
establishes a parallel route through a main commercial area.
IM.7 Relocate the existing railroad crossing at South Dowling Road to align with the Royder Road
intersection with FM 2154. Coordinate with Union Pacific Railroad to relocate the railroad crossing
to increase safety and connectivity.
IM.8 Evaluate an alternative entrance into the Shiloh Subdivision to potentially close the railroad
crossing at Butte Drive. Assess the feasibility of possible locations for an alternative access. If a
viable alternative is identified, construction of the alternative will help facilitate implementation of a
continuous railroad quiet zone corridor.
Page 91 of 338
27CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
The success of the Wellborn District Plan requires the commitment of the City and
the community to implement the goals of this plan. This chapter lays out several
implementation methods and funding sources for accomplishing the goals and
actions contained within the plan. Additionally, the implementation matrix outlines
the timeframe, establishes implementation responsibilities and administration, and
determines possible funding sources for actions within the plan.
PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION4
Page 92 of 338
28CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Implementation Methods
Generally, the actions of this plan fall into one of five methods: capital improvement, focused planning
effort, policy-based decision, project/program, or regulation. Implementation of each category requires
unique approaches and produces different results. Table 4.1: Implementation Matrix indicates the most
appropriate implementation method for each action.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Capital improvements are large-scale infrastructure projects that the City pursues through the Capital
Improvement Projects department. These expansion, modification, rehabilitation, and replacement projects
include streets, utilities, parks, and public facilities and buildings. To be implemented, actions in this
category need to be added to the Capital Plan, funded, and constructed.
FOCUSED PLANNING EFFORTS
Focused planning efforts are studies, plans, and designs that various City departments complete to identify
specific steps needed for implementation. Actions in this category need to be analyzed with resulting
recommendations. Implementation of the recommendations is commonly pursued under a different action.
This Wellborn District Plan is a focused planning effort.
POLICY-BASED DECISIONS
Policy-based decisions are direction that the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council provide
to City staff. These decisions get implemented in various policy, regulatory, and guidance documents to
implement the direction from the elected and appointed officials of College Station. Direction should be
sought on actions in this category, and City staff should take the appropriate steps for implementation.
PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS
Projects and programs are the broadest category of plan actions. These can include projects that are not
considered capital improvements and programs that the City organizes administratively. Implementation of
actions in this category should be assessed individually as there are a variety of ways to accomplish these
actions. Generally, the action provides an indication of what implementation should consider and how it
might be implemented.
REGULATIONS
Regulations are developed by the City to guide or permit allowable activities within College Station.
These can include modifications to the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, including the Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO), or another regulatory document under the jurisdiction of the City of College
Station. To be implemented, actions in this category should be adopted in their respective regulatory
documents.
Page 93 of 338
29CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Funding
Funding for plan actions come from a variety of sources. Generally, the actions in the Wellborn District Plan
can be funded by one or more of the following sources: City department budgets, the Capital Improvement
Projects fund, state and federal grants, and/or private investment. All funding options should be explored,
but Table 4.1: Implementation Matrix indicates the funding mechanisms that City staff have identified as
most appropriate or likely to complete the action.
DEPARTMENTAL BUDGETS
Funding projects through City departmental budgets can be accomplished in two ways: using available
funds and directing them towards the project or through service level adjustments (SLAs). SLAs are
approved as part of the annual City budget process and can be for one-time or recurring expenses. Many of
the actions in the Wellborn District Plan can be accomplished through departmental budgets.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
These are large infrastructure improvements
that are most likely to be funded through
the Capital Improvement Program funds.
The projects from these funds are prioritized
and budgeted on a rolling five-year Capital
Plan. These funds are also allocated during
the annual City budget process as one-time
expenses.
STATE AND FEDERAL FUNDING
Funding opportunities from the state and
federal government are also available,
particularly in the areas of transportation and
the environment. These funds are primarily
available through grants but may also be
through specific budget appropriations.
Often, grant funding includes local matching
requirements. Included in this funding source
is Community Development Block Grants
(CDBG) funds. A portion of the Wellborn area
located west of FM 2154 (Wellborn Road) is
currently eligible for CDBG funding. Eligibility
may change in future years with updated
Census data.
PRIVATE INVESTMENTS
Outside of government funding, private
investments can be pursued through
development exactions within the UDO,
foundation investments, or donations to the
City for specific projects.
Page 94 of 338
Table 4.1: Implementation Matrix
CHAPTERACTION NUMBERACTION ITEM TASK TYPE
IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
CITY – RESPONSIBLE PARTY PARTNERS – INTERNAL PARTNERS – EXTERNAL
FUNDING SOURCES
Short (1-3 years)Medium (4-7 years)Long (8-10 years)CITY / DEPT. BUDGETSCIP BUDGETGRANTSPRIVATECHAPTER 2: DISTINCTIVE PLACESDP.1
Amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map and corresponding categories to incorporate the recommended modifications for Wellborn. This includes retiring the prior Wellborn land uses, assigning future land uses as determined through this
planning process, and revising the appropriate future land use categories to specify where the Wellborn-specific zoning districts are the
only zoning districts allowed within the plan boundary.
Policy-based
decision X Planning & Development Services X
DP.2
Retool the Wellborn zoning districts into a design district in the Unified Development Ordinance. To highlight the unique character of
developments within the Wellborn District, the Wellborn-specific zoning districts should be reworked into a design district. The zoning
standards should also be evaluated to determine if additional modifications are needed to enhance the rural character of Wellborn.
Policy-based decision X Planning & Development Services Residents of Wellborn X
DP.3
Create a village center around Live Oak Street to facilitate the area becoming the new “main street” for the Wellborn District. Revising the future land uses, extending Live Oak Street to connect to McCullough Road, implementing the revised design district standards and other appropriate place making strategies will help realize the vision for a new “main street” one block away from FM 2154. This change may also help spur additional small- scale commercial development along Live Oak Street.
Policy-based decision, regulation, and capital improvement
X Planning & Development Services Capital Improvement Projects X X X
DP.4
Work with residents and business owners to assess the potential need, benefit, and structure of creating a Wellborn District Association. A Wellborn District Association comprised of local residents and business owners could collectively initiate actions to improve the Wellborn District and coordinate local events. Having an association registered with the City facilitates information sharing and courtesy notifications, including updates on development activity and City projects within the district.
Project / program X Neighborhood Services Economic Development & Tourism Planning & Development Services Residents of Wellborn X X
DP.5 Work with community stakeholders to create identification and gateway signage. These placemaking features should have details that reflect the community’s rural context. Consider including a central gateway element near the Post Office. City staff should collaborate with stakeholders on funding and location opportunities for improvements that highlight the Wellborn District identity.
Capital improvement X Planning & Development Services Capital Improvement Projects Residents of Wellborn X X X
DP.6 Create opportunities for residents and visitors to engage with the history of the Wellborn District. The Wellborn District predates the incorporation of the City of College Station with a rich history. A history of Wellborn was prepared in 2010 and could be a resource for the identification and preservation of the local history.
Project /
program X Planning & Development Services Neighborhood Services Economic Development & Tourism Residents of Wellborn X X
DP.7 Conduct enhanced outreach and educational efforts about local ordinances, Code Enforcement, and the SeeClickFix program. To expand the spread of information and encourage compliance with the Code of Ordinances, Code Enforcement officers could proactively share educational materials or host workshops in the Wellborn District.
Project / program X Community Services Planning & Development Services X
CHAPTER 3: INTEGRATED MOBILITYIM.1
Add a new 2 Lane Minor Collector connection from the extension between McCullough Road and Brewster Drive to Barron Cut-off
Road. The connection between the extension of Brewster Drive and McCullough Road and Barron Cut-Off Road provides a north/south
thoroughfare parallel to FM 2154.
Policy-based decision X Planning & Development Services X
IM.2 Revise various proposed sidewalks and bicycle facilities to shared-use paths. These changes support the plan vision for a rural context mobility system while meeting the City’s goal of a safe and connected multi-mobility network. These revisions are on I&GN Road, South Dowling Road, Barron Cut-off Road, Victoria Avenue, Woodlake Drive, Royder Road extension, and Greens Prairie Road.
Policy-based decision X Planning & Development Services X
IM.3 Revise the proposed bicycle route to a shared-use path along I&GN Road. The shared-use path meets the goals for a safer, off-street option for bicycling and walking and helps maintain the rural road character for I&GN Road.Policy-based decision X Planning & Development Services X
IM.4 Add a shared-use path along FM 2154. As the Texas Department of Transportation improves FM 2154, they intend to add a shared-use path along the project. Adding this to City plans acknowledges the provided facility.Policy-based decision X Planning & Development Services X
IM.5 Add a shared-use path along McCullough Road. Adding this shared-use path connects north/south and east/west bicycle and pedestrian routes inside the plan boundary and to surrounding areas.Policy-based decision X Planning & Development Services X
IM.6 Extend Live Oak Street from its current terminus near Church Street to McCullough Road. This facilitates Live Oak Street becoming a “main street” within the Wellborn District. It also establishes a parallel route through a main commercial area.Capital improvement X Capital Improvement Projects Planning & Development Services Public Works X X X
IM.7 Relocate the existing railroad crossing at South Dowling Road to align with the Royder Road intersection with FM 2154. Coordinate with Union Pacific Railroad to relocate the railroad crossing to increase safety and connectivity.Capital improvement X Capital Improvement Projects
City Manager’s Office Public WorksPlanning & Development Services
Union Pacific Railroad Texas Department of Transportation X X
IM.8
Evaluate an alternative entrance into the Shiloh Subdivision to potentially close the railroad crossing at Butte Drive. Assess the
feasibility of possible locations for an alternative access. If a viable alternative is identified, construction of the alternative will help
facilitate implementation of a continuous railroad quiet zone corridor.
Capital improvement X Capital Improvement Projects Planning & Development Services City Manager’s Office Public Works Union Pacific Railroad Texas Department of Transportation X X X
Page 95 of 338
31CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
APPENDIX A:
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Surrounding Context
The Wellborn community was annexed into the City of College Station in April 2011. The Wellborn
Community Plan, which gave residents a voice in managing the growth and development of the area,
was adopted shortly thereafter in April 2013 and included a planning horizon from 2013 to 2023. The plan
helped address concerns raised by residents that the rural and historic community character would be
lost as development pressure loomed. As the Wellborn Community Plan reaches the end of its planning
horizon, the City of College Station reexamined the area to analyze the changes that have occurred in the
previous 10 years and prepare for the next 10 years. Renamed the Wellborn District Plan, this plan update
aims to create a cohesive district that reflects the residents’ vision for the community, recognizes the unique
character of Wellborn, and supports the overall vision of College Station.
The Wellborn District is in the southwest portion of the city and intersects the extraterritorial jurisdiction.
The City enforces land use, zoning, and subdivision and development standards within the city limits, but
only regulates the subdivision of land within the extraterritorial jurisdiction. The City cannot enforce or
establish regulatory tools to manage growth along the city’s periphery.
The boundary of the area mirrors that of the Wellborn Community Plan, reflective of this plan’s intention
to focus on the core of the historical Wellborn area. When the 2023 planning effort began, staff analyzed
the area holistically including the impacts of several nearby subdivisions. Due to resident concern over
potentially expanding the plan boundary to include surrounding areas, the original plan boundary has been
retained.
Demographics
The Wellborn District’s population has remained consistent over the past 10 years. The Wellborn District
population increased from approximately 300 people in 2013 to 468 in 2023, an increase of 56% based
on estimates from the ESRI Living Atlas. The population makes up approximately 0.3% of the total city
population.
Page 96 of 338
32CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
AGE & SEX
The current social makeup of the Wellborn District is an even mix of age groups and sex. The largest single
age range is individuals between 15-24 years old, which comprise 18% of the district population based
on estimates from the ESRI Living Atlas. Individuals between 25-34 years old make up roughly 13.5% of
the population, 15% are between the ages of 35-44 years old, 12.5% are between the ages of 45-54 years
old, and 9.5% are between 55-64 years old. The residents are 50% female and 50% male. The district is
comprised of people of all ages and is distributed evenly between women and men.
RACE & ETHNICITY
The area has a higher percentage of individuals who identify as White at 70% as compared to 62.3%
citywide. The district also has 14% of people who identify as Hispanic, 12% who identify as Asian, 11% who
identify as two or more races, 4% who identify as Black or African American, and 3% who identify as some
other race based on estimates from the ESRI Living Atlas. When comparing these percentages to the city,
Wellborn has a less racially diverse population than the city.
FAMILY SIZE & INCOME
As of 2023, the population estimate of the district is 468 individuals. There are 74 households within the
district with an average family size of 3.6 individuals. The median household income is $98,276 and the per
capita income is $43,946 based on estimates from the ESRI Living Atlas. When looking at the rest of the
city, the district has a higher average household income and a lower per capita income.
EDUCATION
Educational attainment data is reflected in the
American Community Survey by respondents
selecting their highest level of educational attainment.
This is measured by calculating the number of
residents who have graduated from high school and/
or graduated from college. A majority of the population
within the Wellborn district have achieved a bachelor’s
degree or a graduate degree, representing roughly
64% of area residents. Approximately 10% hold an
associate degree, 15% have attended some college
without graduating, and 9.5% are high school
graduates. Wellborn residents have graduated college
at a similar rate compared to the rest of College
Station.
When looking at all demographic data presented, this
district is less racially diverse, has a higher median
income, and is more evenly distributed by age than
College Station as a whole. This can be attributed to
the location of the district within the city, as it is farther
away from the Texas A&M University campus and
predominantly contains medium to low-density single-
family residences and large acreage properties, which
often are owned by more affluent residents.
Page 97 of 338
33CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
District Character
EXISTING LAND USE
The district is primarily made up of a mix of single-family residential lots and undeveloped land, with
some commercial and light industrial uses as well. Residential uses make up just over 39% of the area
and approximately 36% of the area is undeveloped, reflecting the rural character of the area. Public and
semi-public uses comprise just over 10% of the land uses in the district, and the remaining areas are light
industrial or commercial uses, including retail and restaurants.
FUTURE LAND USE
The future land use designations within the district are grounded in historical land use patterns. In 2013,
the Wellborn Community Plan classified future land uses into eight categories – Wellborn Business Park,
Wellborn Commercial, Wellborn Suburban, Wellborn Restricted Suburban, Wellborn Preserve, Wellborn
Preserve-Open, Wellborn Estate, and Wellborn Estate-Open. Other future land uses in the area include
Estate Residential, Suburban Residential, Institutional/Public, Natural & Open Areas, and Rural, all of
which support the rural character represented in the original Wellborn Community Plan. During the 2021
Comprehensive Plan Update, the eight land use designations specific to the Wellborn area were grouped
and depicted simply as Wellborn, while also retaining the underlying future land uses. This change was
made in anticipation of this Wellborn District Plan update effort in 2023, recognizing that residents would be
reengaged to further discuss the future of Wellborn. Appropriate modifications to the future land uses will
be made with this planning effort. In general, anticipated changes will continue to prioritize maintaining rural
character with open space that is both privately and publicly held and small-scale commercial uses that
support nearby low-density residential properties.
ZONING
The zoning of the area reflects the future land use categories detailed above and the vision of the Wellborn
Community Plan. One of the recommendations from the 2013 plan was the creation of several Wellborn-
specific zoning districts. Following the plan’s adoption, staff created the WC Wellborn Commercial, WRS
Wellborn Restricted Suburban, and WE Wellborn Estate zoning districts in late 2016. Only the WC Wellborn
Commercial and WRS Wellborn Restricted Suburban zoning districts actively exist on properties within the
district today, though the WE Wellborn Estate zoning is still an available option for property owners.
There are currently four zoning districts on the ground within the district – WC Wellborn Commercial,
SC Suburban Commercial, WRS Wellborn Restricted Suburban, and R Rural. The zoning in Wellborn
reflects the low-density residential and commercial uses of the area. The properties zoned SC Suburban
Commercial were zoned before the creation of the WC Wellborn Commercial zoning district. A few
properties have made use of PDD Planned Development Districts, which is a customized zoning district
option that utilizes a base zoning of one of the other districts mentioned above with modifications. PDD
Planned Development Districts within the area have primarily been utilized for moderate-density single-
family subdivisions. Properties that are zoned R Rural account for 85.5% of the area. When areas are
annexed into the City of College Station, they are assigned the R Rural zoning designation. The majority of
lots in Wellborn have not undergone a zoning change since annexation.
Page 98 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 EXISTING LAND USE MAP]
Existing
Land Use
FM 2154FM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEE
TT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWE
T
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
MOBILE/ MANUFACTURED HOME
COMMERCIAL RETAIL
COMMERCIAL OFFICE
COMMERCIAL OTHER
PUBLIC FACILITIES
SEMI-PUBLIC
TRANSPORTATION, UTILITIES
& COMMUNICATION
COMMON AREA
UNIMPROVED
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
AGRICULTURAL
RURAL
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJ
MAP A.1
Page 99 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 EXISTING ZONING MAP]
Zoning
WELLBORNDISTRICT
FM 2154FM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
RD
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEE
TT
DRDR
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWE
T
DR
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJ
R
R
R
WRS
WRS
PDD
PDD
WC
PDD
SC
WC
PDD
WC
WC
WC
SC
WC
SC
R
R
SC
R
R
R
R
R
R
R RURAL
E ESTATE
RS RESTRICTED SUBURBAN
SC SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL
GC GENERAL COMMERCIAL
PDD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT
GS GENERAL SUBURBAN
R-1B SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
WC WELLBORN COMMERCIALww
WRS WELLBORN RESTRICTED
SUBURBAN
w w
MAP A.2
Page 100 of 338
36CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
Housing in the district illustrates the single-family nature of the area. According to the ESRI Living Atlas,
83% of the 163 housing units are owner-occupied, which is an increase from 2010 when 65% of the
83 housing units were owner-occupied. This trend is also seen in the number of housing units that are
registered with the City’s Rental Registration program which sits at only 12%. Of the owner-occupied
housing units, the average home value is $375,000 which is higher than the city’s average home value of
$368,995 as of July 2023.
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS
Neighborhood centers are areas where individuals naturally congregate when they are outside of their
homes. This includes schools, churches, commercial areas, or a general gathering point that primarily
serves residents. Three schools operated by the College Station Independent School District serve the
Wellborn area and neighborhoods nearby. Wellborn Middle School is located within the boundary of
this planning effort while Greens Prairie Intermediate School and Pecan Trail Elementary School are just
outside of it. There are also several churches in the area including Wellborn Baptist Church, Saint Meena
Coptic Orthodox Church, and Salem Baptist Church. Additional neighborhood centers include the Wellborn
Community Center and America’s Country Store that both act as congregating locations while catering to
different needs for residents.
Page 101 of 338
37CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
CODE ENFORCEMENT
Code Enforcement responds to complaints made regarding a wide range of issues that typically do not
require the attention of law enforcement. The district had 114 code enforcement cases in the past decade
ranging from illegal signs and use violations to property maintenance complaints. The most common
code violations were illegal signs, amounting to just over 25% of cases. The City regulates and permits
signage under specific standards. If a property does not have its signage permitted through the City, then
this would result in a code enforcement case violation. The second highest violation at just over 20% was
violating the City’s Rental Registration program requirement. These violations were usually due to properties
still functioning as a rental without renewing their registration with the City. The third largest issue was
general property maintenance concerns with almost 15% of all cases. During these investigations, Code
Enforcement officers reach out to property owners to ensure their structure is safe to live in and help them
find resources to ensure the structure complies with the City of College Station Code of Ordinances.
Table A.1, Code Enforcement Cases, 2012-2022 reflects the past 10 years of code enforcement cases
within the district.
Table A.1: Code Enforcement Cases, 2012-2022
Code Violation Type Number of Cases
Accumulation of Trash
Trash over-flow, typically in yards 5
Cans Out After Collection Day
Trash cans still on curb after trash collection day 0
Illegal Signs
Signs that are being displayed are prohibited per the City Code 29
Junk Motor Vehicles
Dilapidated cars are left in the yard, visible from the street 12
Liquor License Expired
Business establishments running with an expired liquor license 3
Non-Specific Investigation
General inquiries/complaints that don’t fit into a specific violation-type 3
Open Storage
Storage visible from the street 0
Parking
Illegal parking violations 4
Property Maintenance
Property is not being maintained, including structural and safety issues 17
Rental Registration
A property’s Rental Registration with the City has expired 23
Use Violations
Prohibited use type is being used 15
Weeds & Grass
A property’s yard is not being properly maintained 3
Page 102 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 CODE ENFORCEMENT CASE DENSITY MAP] CODE ENFORCMENT DENSITY*
MID HIGHLOW
Code Enforcement
Case Density
Code Enforcement Cases collected by the
College Station Code Enforcement Division
from 2012-2022 was used to map code issues.
These are cases concerning compliance with
*Based on the number of cases
within a 250 foot radius
codes related to: parking, weeds & grass,
health & safety, zoning violations, sanitation &
illegal dumping.FM 2154FM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
OY
DER
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPS TO NE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEE
TT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWE
T
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJ
MAP A.3
Page 103 of 338
39CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
The City of College Station manages requests and reviews of development proposals and administers
development standards through a variety of processes. One development project often necessitates
multiple processes, reviews, permits, and inspections before it can be constructed and occupied. An
example is a new commercial center that could require a Final Plat, a Development Permit, a Site Plan
Review, an Architectural Review, and a Building Permit with inspections. Another example is a new
residential subdivision that could require a Zoning Map Amendment, a Preliminary Plan, Final Plats, and
Building Permits with inspections.
Each project is analyzed for the permits or reviews that will be needed, and in what order those must be
obtained. Each permit or review undergoes review by numerous staff in various departments throughout
the City. Before the initiation of a project, the City offers pre-application conferences that allow all applicable
reviewing departments to communicate the expectations of the project clearly to a future applicant to assist
with quicker reviews down the line.
Table A.2, Development Activity, 2012-2022 shows archived and approved project applications over the
last 10 years within the district boundaries. Common applications included rezonings to districts supported
by the Wellborn Community Plan, site plans for commercial properties, and right-of-way permits. Pre-
application conferences were also common and the frequency of these has increased in recent years, which
shows increasing pressures to develop within the area.
Table A.2: Development Activity, 2012-2022
Review Type Number of Reviews
Annexations 2
Appeals, Waivers, and Variances 1
Architectural Reviews 8
Commercial Final Plats 1
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 3
Development Permits 3
Pre-Application Conferences 26
Preliminary Plans 1
Residential Final Plats 3
Rezonings 10
Right-of-Way Permits 6
Site Plans 9
Page 104 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 NEW DEVELOPMENT MAP] FM 2154FM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
RBARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEE
TT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
RBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWE
T
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJ
COMMERCIAL
NON-RESIDENTIAL
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Development
Activity
SS DODOWLIWLI
RDRD
S DOWLI
RD
NNNGGG
MAP A.4
Page 105 of 338
41CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
As the Wellborn District and surrounding areas have grown, the City has continued to invest in designing,
rehabilitating, and constructing streets to continue to support commuters into, out of, and through the area.
The two primary capital improvement projects that have been completed in the last 10 years were Royder
Road Rehabilitation Phases 1-3 and Greens Prairie Trail Phases 1-3. The Royder Road Rehabilitation project
included the realignment and widening of the road from the north of Backwater Drive to Wellborn Road
which reclassified the road as a major collector with sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides of the road.
This project was largely in response to Wellborn Middle School, Greens Prairie Elementary School, and
Pecan Trail Intermediate School being built and increasing the amount of traffic flow in the area. The Greens
Prairie Trail (now Greens Prairie Road) project widened the road to a 4 Lane Minor Arterial with bike lanes
and sidewalks. These projects directly achieved the Wellborn Community Plan’s action items M1.2, M8.2,
M2.2, and M3.1 which state that road improvements, such as road maintenance and rehabilitation, be made
for Greens Prairie Road, Greens Prairie Road W, Royder Road, and Victoria Avenue. Other projects pursued
under these action items include road improvements on McCullough Road, Church Street, Madison Street,
and Live Oak Street, in which the City provided preventative road maintenance to the street pavement that
included lane stripes and bicycle markers for a protected bike lane.
Economic Indicators
The development in the area has primarily been residential, but
the area has seen some commercial growth as well. According to
the data provided by the ESRI Living Atlas, the district currently
contains approximately 55 different businesses and employs 377
individuals which equates to roughly 7 employees per business. That
is considerably lower than the city’s overall average of 12.5 employees
per business.
Property ownership stability is an important indicator of how
frequently new people or businesses are occupying the area. Of the
279 properties, 120, or 43%, were owned by the same entity in 2017
and 2022. Of those properties, 42, or 15%, were owned by the same
entity in 2012 and 2022. This data shows that more than 80% of
properties changed hands in the past 10 years, indicating a significant
turnover in property ownership and change within the district.
Mobility
STREETS
The Thoroughfare Plan within the City’s Comprehensive Plan details the location and size of existing and
future major roadways throughout College Station. It is based on the projected traffic demand resulting
from the anticipated growth in population and employment and is guided by the Future Land Use &
Character Map. It includes the location of streets which may need to be constructed, extended, or improved
and the number of lanes for each thoroughfare in the system. Functional classifications for thoroughfares
differentiate the number of vehicles they are anticipated to accommodate and the number of lanes that are
required. In the Wellborn Community Plan, action item M1.1 specified removing several streets from the
Thoroughfare Plan to further retain the rural characteristics of the community. This is now reflected in the
current classifications of thoroughfares within the district.
Page 106 of 338
42CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
The highest classification road within the district is Wellborn Road (FM 2154), which is a future 4 Lane
Major Arterial that runs along the Union Pacific Railroad. Greens Prairie Road is a partially constructed
existing 4 Lane Minor Arterial between Wellborn Road and Royder Road. The remaining section to be
improved was approved on the 2022 Brazos County Bond Proposition A and is anticipated to be complete
within the next five years. Royder Road is also a future 4 Lane Minor Arterial. Victoria Avenue is a proposed
2 Lane Major Collector and Creek Meadow Boulevard North is an existing 2 Lane Minor Collector. Three
streets within the district are proposed 2 Lane Minor Collectors: McCullough Road, Live Oak Street, and
South Dowling Road.
BICYCLES
In conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan, the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan works to
expand the bicycle and pedestrian network through the development of facilities on new and rehabilitated
streets, off-street shared-use paths, and along the city’s greenways.
There are currently 0.7 miles of existing bike lanes within the district. The Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan calls for an additional 2.2 miles of proposed bike facilities and 0.5 miles of proposed
bike routes. There are currently bike racks provided in four different locations across the district, including
Wellborn Middle School, the Magruder Office, TDI Brooks International Lab, and Wellborn Business
Park. There are also bike racks located at Pecan Trail Elementary School and within the Creek Meadows
subdivision, though these are outside of the district boundary.
SIDEWALKS
There are currently roughly 2.4 miles of existing sidewalks within the district and 2.7 miles that are proposed
to be developed in the future. Similar to decreasing the intensity of the street classifications, the Wellborn
Community Plan also called for the removal of proposed sidewalks within the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan on McCullough Road, Greens Prairie Road West, I&GN Road, and South Dowling
Road. During the public engagement for the Wellborn Community Plan, residents mentioned the desire
to maintain rural open ditch section roads, arguing that sidewalks did not reflect the rural character they
desired. These changes were ultimately incorporated into the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master
Plan.
Page 107 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 THOROUGHFARE PLAN MAP]
Existing
Thoroughfare Plan
FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY
PROPOSED FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY
LANEMAJOR ARTERIAL
PROPOSEDL ANEMAJOR ARTERIAL
LANEMAJOR ARTERIAL
PROPOSEDL ANEMAJOR ARTERIAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
PROPOSED MINOR ARTERIAL
MAJORCOLLECTOR
PROPOSEDMAJOR COLLECTOR
MINORCOLLECTOR
PROPOSED MINORCOLLECTORFM 2154FM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
ROY
DER
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
L
AKE
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPS TO NE D R
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
ILLIP
S
PK
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
A
VE
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
A
VE
SWSWEE
TT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
A
VE
SWE
T
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJ
MAP A.5
Page 108 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 BICYCLE PLAN MAP]
Existing Bicycle
Plan
BIKE LANE EXISTING
BIKE LANE FUNDED
BIKE FACILITY PROPOSED
BIKE ROUTE EXISTING
BIKE ROUTE PROPOSED
SHARED-USE PATH EXISTING
SHARED-USE PATH FUNDED
SHARED-USE PATH PROPOSED
GRADE SEPARATION EXISTING
GRADE SEPARATION FUNDED
GRADE SEPARATION PROPOSED
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJFM 2154FM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
W
O
O
D
LAK
E
DR
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CA PS TO NE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
YET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEETT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
YET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWET
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
MAP A.6
Page 109 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 PEDESTRIAN PLAN MAP]
Existing
Pedestrian Plan
SIDEWALK EXISTING
SIDEWALK FUNDED
SIDEWALK PROPOSED
SHARED-USE PATH EXISTING
SHARED-USE PATH FUNDED
SHARED-USE PATH PROPOSED
GRADE SEPARATION EXISTING
GRADE SEPARATION FUNDED
GRADE SEPARATION PROPOSED
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJFM 2154FM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
ILLIP
S
PK
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
NB
UR
Y AV
E
SWSWEETT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RDRO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWET
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
MAP A.7
Page 110 of 338
46CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
TRANSIT
Neither Brazos Transit District nor Texas A&M University Transportation Services offer transit service in
the Wellborn District. College Station Independent School District has bus routes serving students who
live in the neighborhoods that feed into their schools. Residents in the Wellborn District depend heavily on
personal automobiles to navigate around the area and the city.
CRASH DATA
Over the last 10 years, there have been 154 vehicular crashes within the district. Out of these, 147, or 95%,
were indicated to be minor crashes and either had no injuries, suspected minor injuries, or possible injuries.
Of the crashes, 105, or 68%, occurred on Wellborn Road (FM 2154), the largest thoroughfare in the district.
Page 111 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 CRASH DENSITY MAP]
CRASH DENSITY*
MID HIGHLOW
1 FM 2154 & S DOWLING RD
2 FM 2154 & CHURCH ST
3 VICTORIA AVE & ROYDER RD
4 FM 2154 & VICTORIA AVE
5 FM 2154 & BETWEEN MCCULLOUGH RD
& BARRON CUT-OFF RD
Crash Density
TOP 5 INTERSECTIONS
WITH CRASHES
Crash data collected by the College
Station Police Department from 2012-
2022 was used to map tra ic accidents
spanning all modes of transportation.
*Based on the number of crashes
within a 250 foot radius
1
2
34
5
FM 2154FM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
RD
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEE
TT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWE
T
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJ
MAP A.8
Page 112 of 338
48CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Utilities
The Wellborn district is served by College Station Utilities (CSU), Bryan Texas Utilities (BTU), and Wellborn
Special Utilities District (Wellborn SUD), depending on the utility and property location. Wellborn SUD
provides water service, CSU provides wastewater service to approximately 9% of the district, and BTU
provides electric service for the area. Outside of the CSU wastewater service boundary specified by the
Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN), most residents in the district are on septic systems.
The district is limited in what types of developments it can sufficiently support due to various utility
constraints. Wastewater capacity is a primary limiting factor since most developments are not connected
to the City’s sewer system and must maintain a 1-acre or greater lot size for septic system requirements.
All development proposals in the Wellborn District must get approvals from the applicable providers before
they can begin development. Staff from all three organizations have and will continue to share information
pertinent to utility provision and utility planning within the district.
Floodplain
While there is no FEMA-identified floodplain within the district, there are several tributaries throughout
the area providing natural drainage as part of the Peach Creek Drainage Basin. Further research and
identification studies are needed to determine precise floodplain boundaries in the district.
Conclusion
Analyzing the current conditions of the Wellborn District provides context for the plan update process.
This data supports and informs residents, participants, and City staff to guide the decisions made when
envisioning the future of the Wellborn District. The existing conditions of this district largely reflect the
implementation of the original Wellborn Community Plan which has helped maintain the rural character
of the area. This includes limited sidewalks connecting community areas, decreasing the functional
classifications of some thoroughfares, and creating Wellborn-specific zoning districts, all of which aid in
maintaining the rural character and feel of the Wellborn area. This planning effort should be intentional to
guide the next decade of development and build on past successes by anticipating and guiding growth
pressures and identifying additional ways to embrace the spirit of Wellborn.
Page 113 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 WATER SERVICE AREAS MAP]
Water Service
Areas
FM 2154FM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
RD
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEE
TT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWE
T
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION WATER
WELLBORN SUD
MAP A.9
Page 114 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 WASTEWATER SERVICE AREAS MAP]
Wastewater
Service Areas
FM 2154FM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
RD
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEETT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWET
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
COLLEGE STATION WASTEWATER
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJ
M AP A.10
Page 115 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 ELECTRIC SERVICE MAP]
Electric Service
Areas
FM 2154FM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
RD
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
LA
KE
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEE
TT
DRDR
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CREEKCREEKMEAMEADDOWOW BLVDBLVD NN
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWE
T
DR
E
W
A
T
E
R
CREEKMEADOW BLVD N
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION UTILITIES (CSU)
BRYAN TEXAS UTILITIES (BTU)
MAP A.11
Page 116 of 338
[INSERT 11X17 FLOODPLAIN MAP]
Floodplain
FLOODPLAIN
RIVERS & STREAMS
FM 2154FM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
OY
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULMCCULLOUGH RDLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
W
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
SS DODOWLINGWLINGRDRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDBARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
CAPS TO NE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
W
S
PH
IL
LI
PS
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWSWEETT
D
R
D
R
EE
WW
AA
T
E
R
T
E
R
CHURCHURCHCH STST VICTORIA AVEVICTORIA AVECACASTLESTLEGGATEATEDD RR
PORTLAND AVEPORTLAND AVEFM 2154FM 2154I&GN
RD
I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
DFM 2154R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDKOPPE BRIDGE RDMCCULLOUGH RDVICTORIA AVEGREENS PRAIRIE RDW
O
O
D
L
AK
E
D
R
S DOWLINGRD BARRON CUT-OFF RDCAPST ONE DR
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
ET
O
N
B
U
RY
AV
E
SWET
D
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
CHURCH ST VICTORIA AVECASTLEGATED R
PORTLAND AVEFM 2154I&GN
RD
R
O
Y
D
E
R
R
D
MINTERBRANCHTRIBUTARY4
SPRI NGCREEKTRIBUTARY7.1HO
PESCREEKH
OPESCREEK
T
RI
B
UTA
RY10.1
HOPESCRE E K T R IB U T A R Y 3.3S
P
RINGCREEK
P
EACH
CREEK
S
OUTH T R IB U T ARY24 SPRINGCREEKTRIBUTARY7PEAC
H
CREEK
S
OUTH
T
RI
BUTARY25PEACHCREEK SO
UTHTR
I
BUTAR
Y
22P
E
A
CHCRE
EKSOUTH
TRIBUTARY
18PEACHCREEKSOUT
HTRIBUTA
R
Y16.6HOPESCR EEK T RIBUTARY10PEACHCREEKSOUTH TRIBUT
A
R
Y
16.4HOPESCREEK TRIBU T A R Y 3PEACHCREEKS
OUT
HT
RIBUTARY20PEACHCREEKSOUTH
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
COLLEGE STATION ETJ
M AP A.12
Page 117 of 338
53CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
APPENDIX B: PUBLIC
ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY
Public participation and input are critical to any planning effort. The knowledge and
experience of residents help City staff understand the concerns of the community
and adjust the plan accordingly. The City of College Station places a high priority on
receiving and responding to resident feedback; to that end, City staff offered numerous
engagement opportunities in various formats to empower everyone to have their
voices heard. The following describes those opportunities and summarizes the public
feedback.
Page 118 of 338
54CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
WORKING GROUP MEETING – JANUARY 18, 2023
After compiling the existing conditions data, the Working
Group held its kick-off meeting to discuss the project,
lessons learned from the Wellborn Community Plan, and
goals for the new planning effort. This meeting included
a community listening session, which gave City staff a
good jumping off point for the entire planning effort.
AREA-WIDE MEETING – JANUARY 24, 2023
Before this meeting, City staff mailed fliers to property
and business owners within the planning area with
details for this meeting along with future meetings on
February 28, March 21 (virtual meeting), and May 30.
This first area-wide meeting centered on defining the
scope of the project and continued the community
listening session from the January 18 Working Group
meeting.
VIRTUAL ENGAGEMENT SITE – FEBRUARY TO JUNE 2023
In addition to the in-person meetings, staff offered numerous opportunities to provide feedback throughout
the planning effort. The site launched with more information on the timeline of the planning effort, ideas
on goals from the first phase meetings, and a map where individuals could provide ideas, things they liked,
and things they wanted to see changed. The virtual engagement site also hosted a comment map for the
proposed changes to the Thoroughfare Plan and Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan.
WORKING GROUP MEETING – FEBRUARY 15, 2023
The Working Group met to discuss the feedback City staff received from the January 18 and 24 meetings.
One of the main themes from the listening session was maintaining a rural character. In an effort to clarify
that concept, the Working Group identified specific characteristics and land uses that would help to keep
Wellborn rural.
AREA-WIDE MEETING – FEBRUARY 28, 2023
Building upon the feedback from the February 15 meeting, City staff led participants in the same activities
to identify the rural character and where different land uses should be located to achieve the goals of
the community. The results of this meeting and the February 15 meeting were, among other things, used
to establish the proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use & Character Map,
Thoroughfare Plan, and the bicycle and pedestrian maps within the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways
Master Plan.
VIRTUAL AREA-WIDE MEETING – MARCH 21, 2023
The virtual area-wide meeting focused on gathering feedback on the plan goals and actions from people
who may not have been able to make it to the previous meetings. Incorporating the feedback from the
virtual meeting and all of the previous meetings, staff began drafting the plan actions.
Page 119 of 338
55CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
COMBINED WORKING GROUP & AREA-WIDE MEETING – APRIL 12, 2023
At the first meeting of the planning effort, several questions were asked and concerns raised, about various
infrastructure components, including sewer capacity, roadway capacity, and the FM 2154 (Wellborn Road)
widening project. To address those concerns, staff from the City of College Station Water Services and
Capital Improvements departments and representatives from the Texas Department of Transportation
presented on infrastructure capacity and any planned improvements. Planning & Development Services
staff were present to facilitate the meeting and receive community feedback.
WORKING GROUP MEETING – MAY 16, 2023
City staff presented proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map,
Thoroughfare Plan, and the bicycle and pedestrian maps within the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways
Master Plan based on the feedback received throughout the planning process and received feedback from
the Working Group.
AREA-WIDE MEETING – MAY 30, 2022
After incorporating the comments from the May 16 Working Group meeting, City staff presented proposed
changes to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map, Thoroughfare Plan, and the bicycle
and pedestrian maps within the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. Following this meeting,
staff collated feedback from the previous phases of the planning effort and worked to write the Wellborn
District Plan. Participant responses were incorporated into the plan before it was finalized.
WORKING GROUP MEETING – AUGUST 23, 2023
The Working Group met before the Wellborn District Plan was finalized to discuss and finalize the plan
actions prior to the final area-wide meeting.
AREA-WIDE MEETING – AUGUST 30, 2023
After finishing the Wellborn District Plan, City staff organized a final area-wide meeting to ensure the plan
matched the vision of the community and gather any final suggestions or edits before bringing the plan
forward for adoption.
Page 120 of 338
56CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Thank you to the following individuals and groups who
contributed to the preparation of the Wellborn District Plan.
WELLBORN WORKING GROUP
Acknowledgements
David L. Alexander
Elizabeth Appleby
Dan Casey
Jane Cohen
Robert Cohen
Barry Creighton
Barry Ely
Mark Feldhake
Tim Foster
Stephen Fuchs
Jill George
Robert Grabowsk
Ryan Harrington
Shelly Humphrey
Kevin Kuklis
D. Bradley Laauwe
Shauna Laauwe
Jeff Lehde
Richard Lynn
Thomas Marty
Mike McCleary
Dan McMillan
Erik Moratzka
William Murphy
Bert Nitzke
Rabevra Ofczarzak
Gitta M Pap
Casey Richardson
Ervin Richardson
Lynn Ruoff
Bob Ruth
Kathy Scott
William Scott, Layla
Hensarling Wright
Tony Watson
Tim Wolff
Edward Wren
Larry Young
CITY COUNCIL
John Nichols, Mayor
Mark Smith, Place 1
William Wright, Place 2
Linda Harvell, Place 3
Elizabeth Cunha, Place 4
Bob Yancy, Place 5
Dennis Maloney, Place 6
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Dennis Christiansen, Chairperson
Marcus Chaloupka
Aron Collins
Jason Cornelius
Melissa McIlhaney
Bobby Mirza
David White
Page 121 of 338
57CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
ADMINISTRATION
Bryan Woods, City Manager
Jeff Capps, Deputy City Manager
Jeff Kersten, Assistant City Manager
Jennifer Prochazka, Assistant City Manager
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Michael Ostrowski, CEcD, AICP, Director
Molly Hitchcock, AICP, Assistant Director
Alyssa Halle-Schramm, AICP, LEED GA, Long Range Planning Administrator
Naomi Sing, Staff Planner – Project Manager
Carl Ahrens, Transportation & Mobility Planner
Anthony Armstrong, P.E., CFM, Land Development Review Administrator
Katherine Beaman-Jamael, Graduate Transportation & Mobility Engineer
Samantha Beckman, Planning Intern
Brian Binford, CBO, Building Official
Erika Bridges, P.E., CFM, Assistant City Engineer
Carol Cotter, P.E., CFM, City Engineer
Matthew Ellis, AICP, Senior Planner
Crystal Fails, Staff Assistant
David Hahn, GIS Technician
Lucas Harper, P.E., Civil Engineer
Kristen Hejny, Administrative Support Specialist
Ashley Klein, Planning Intern
Robin Macias, Staff Planner
Aspen Pflanz, Transportation & Mobility Planner
Elise Sawyer, GIS Intern
Gabriel Schrum, Staff Planner
Jason Schubert, AICP, Transportation Planning Coordinator
Gillian Sitler, Graduate Civil Engineer
Julie Svetlik, CFM, GIS Analyst
Bryce Trujillo, Assistant Building Official
Page 122 of 338
58CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
STAFF RESOURCE TEAM
Jennifer Cain, Director of Capital Improvement Projects
Timothy Crabb, Director of Electric Utility
Debbie Eller, Director of Community Services
Emily Fisher, Director of Public Works
Theo Garcia, Civil Engineer, Water Services
Alan Gibbs, Assistant Director of Water Services
Randall Lewis, Assistant Director of Electric Utility
Emily Lopez, Graduate Civil Engineer, Water Services
Stephen Maldonado Jr., Assistant Director
of Water Services
Ramiro Martinez, Engineering Operations Manager,
Water Services
Rachel Mayor, Multimedia Manager
Gary Mechler, Director of Water Services
Barbara Moore, Assistant to the City Manager
Brian Piscacek, Assistant Director of Economic
Development & Tourism
Gustavo Roman, Assistant Director
of Community Services
Natalie Ruiz, Director of Economic
Development & Tourism
Debbie Stickles, Electric Design Supervisor,
Electric Utility
Lucero Valenzuela, Multimedia Coordinator
Page 123 of 338
59CSTX.GOV | WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN
Contributors to the 2013
Wellborn Community Plan
WELLBORN RESOURCE TEAM
David Alexander, Jane Cohen, Renee Evans, Walter
Evans, Bob Fountain, Carol Fountain, Keith Franze,
David Gerling, Patricia Gerling, Darren Hartl, Linda
Hale, Dale Holocek, Mary Ann Nagyvary, Alton
Ofczarzak, Rich Risbon, Sydney Risbon, Lynn Ruoff,
Elizabeth Terry, Kristin Schaefer, Craig Hall (Planning &
Zoning Commission representative), and Mike Ashfield
(Planning & Zoning Commission representative)
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Matt Robinson, Bob Cowell, Molly Hitchcock, Lauren
Hovde, Venessa Garza, Kristen Hejny, Mandi Alford,
Joe Guerra, Barbara Moore, and Jenifer Paz
Page 124 of 338
cstx.gov
Page 125 of 338
2
as amended October 12, 2023
District planning areas present opportunities for a mix of appropriate uses that enhance the unique
characteristics of a defined area of the City. Existing examples include the Wellborn Community Plan
which centers on the unique, rural character of the Wellborn area and the Medical District Master Plan
which focuses on creating a cohesive healthcare and wellness district.
Between 2009 and 2013, residents, staff, and City leadership worked together to create five
neighborhood and small area plans and two district plans. These plans provided strategic
recommendations for an area within a defined timeframe (typically seven years). Once adopted,
those recommendations were either implemented over the planning period or incorporated into
relevant parts of the Comprehensive Plan or other master plans. Occasionally, some action items were
not pursued due to changed conditions, project feasibility, available funding, or waning
neighborhood interest. The City established a formal process for reviewing existing plans and
conducted an audit of the five neighborhood and small area plans in 2022. Nearly 70 percent of
actions across all plans were either completed or in progress as of the audit date, demonstrating a
positive implementation success rate. The audit also analyzed challenges in plan implementation and
provided key recommendations for future small area planning efforts. Based on the audit’s findings,
four of the original five neighborhood and small area plans that were beyond
their planning horizons were retired.
The City will continue pursuing new neighborhood and district planning efforts for
areas facing significant changes or development pressures, or to create or
enhance the unique character of an area.
• Planning Area 1: Wellborn District Community Plan - Adopted in October 2023April 2013, this plan
encompasses 929 acres in the southwestern portion of the City, including much of the historic
Wellborn community and focuses on retaining the rural character of the area. However,
conditions have changed in recent years and the The community is facing continued
development pressures for growth, and the plan directs that pressure into appropriate areas
while preserving, supporting, and enhancing the rural character of the area. that may now be
appropriate, in contrast with the existing plan direction. A renewed planning effort in the
Wellborn area is needed. The zoning districts allowed within the Wellborn District Plan boundary
are limited to: Wellborn zoning districts, BP Business Park, BPI Business Center, CI Commercial
Industrial, R Rural, and NAP Natural Areas Protected.
• Planning Area 2: Medical District Master Plan - Adopted in October 2012, the Medical District
Master Plan creates a focused healthcare and wellness district that includes the City’s major
hospitals and medical facilities. This area is generally located along State Highway 6 near the
Rock Prairie Road interchange, which is one of the primary gateways into the City as one
approaches from the south. The plan links medical facilities into a cohesive district with
supporting commercial and residential areas that are being realized through the Midtown
Reserve & City Center master planned development. The City-owned Midtown Business Park,
consisting of over 250 acres, is located in this general area as well, providing economic
development opportunities for office, light and heavy-industrial, and limited commercial uses.
There are also significant natural features in the area – branches of Lick Creek and Spring Creek –
and these should continue to be incorporated into the district as parks, greenway trails, and
open space. Future development should also continue cohesive identity elements such as
signage, landscaping, and design that visually tie the district together.
CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 26
Page 126 of 338
2
as amended October 12, 2023
Neighborhood Commercial
Areas of commercial activities that cater primarily to nearby
residents. These areas tend to be smaller format than general commercial and located adjacent to major roads along the
fringe of residential areas. Design of these structures is
compatible in size, architecture, and lot coverage with
surrounding residential uses. Height: 1-2 stories average Mobility: Primarily automobile, but accessible by walking, bicycling, and transit
Intent
• Accommodate limited commercial services compared to General Commercial
• Provide pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to surrounding
neighborhoods and nearby public uses (schools, parks, etc.)
• Support some residential uses that are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood character
• Encourage transitions in building height and mass when
adjacent to residential neighborhoods
• In a walkable neighborhood context, locate new buildings near the street and accommodate parking to the side or
rear of buildings with some limited parking in front of
buildings and accommodate on-street parking where
possible Generally appropriate zoning districts:
Suburban commercial and office zoning. Within the Wellborn District, limited to Wellborn Commercial zoning.
CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 37
Page 127 of 338
2
as amended October 12, 2023
Suburban Residential Primarily single-family residential areas that consist of low to
moderate density single-family lots. These areas may also
include limited townhomes, duplexes, other housing types,
and some non-residential uses that are compatible with surrounding single-family areas. Development types tend to
be highly consistent within a subdivision or neighborhood.
Residential lot size requirements are larger within the Wellborn
District and limited to single-family lots. Height: 1-2 stories Mobility: Primarily automobile, but accessible by walking, bicycling, and transit to surrounding neighborhood services
and centers Intent
• Accommodate streetscape features such as sidewalks,
street trees, and lighting
• Support neighborhoods with a mix of housing types
• Encourage community facilities, parks, and greenways
within neighborhoods
• When establishing new residential areas or expanding
existing developments, provide pedestrian and vehicular connectivity between adjacent developments Generally appropriate zoning districts:
General and restricted suburban zoning. Within the Wellborn District, limited to Wellborn Restricted
Suburban zoning.
CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 41
Page 128 of 338
2
as amended October 12, 2023
Estate Residential
Primarily single-family residential areas that have a low level
of development activities. These areas are appropriate for very low-density residential lots of one-acre or greater lot sizes or average 20,000 square feet lots when clustered
around open space. Residential lot size requirements are
larger within the Wellborn District.
Height: 1-2 stories Mobility: Primarily automobile
Intent
• Support a wide range of lot sizes, long blocks, and
curvilinear streets. Buildings tend to be located greater than 30 feet from a fronting street.
• When establishing new residential areas or expanding
existing developments, provide pedestrian and vehicular
connectivity between adjacent developments Generally appropriate zoning districts:
Estate, rural, and manufactured home park zoning
Within the Wellborn District, limited to Wellborn Estate zoning.
CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 42
Page 129 of 338
2
as amended October 12, 2023
Texas A&M University Areas owned by Texas A&M University and are appropriate for campus development as
described in the Texas A&M Campus Master Plan and related documents.
Institutional/Public Areas that are, and are likely to remain, in some form of institutional or public activity.
Examples include schools, libraries, municipal facilities, and major utilities.
Medical
Areas appropriate for medically related uses and supporting office, commercial, and
residential uses. The medical land use designation surrounding Rock Prairie and State
Highway 6 is further detailed in the Medical District Master Plan, which envisions a wide array of medical and supporting services and activities concentrated in the district. This includes
the two major hospitals in close proximity to residential neighborhoods, neighborhood
centers, offices, and commercial uses. Height: Varies Mobility: Walking, bicycling, transit, automobile
Generally appropriate zoning districts: Varies
Wellborn
The Wellborn Community Plan envisions the future of Wellborn to maintain its rural character
with open space that is both privately and publicly held. The area will continue as a place where neighborhood commercial uses support surrounding low-density residential properties. Height: Varies
Mobility: Primarily automobile Zoning districts: Wellborn zoning districts, as appropriate and specified in the Wellborn
Community Plan
CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 44
Page 130 of 338
The Comprehensive Plan sets the framework to create distinctive places, strong
neighborhoods, a prosperous economy, and engaging natural spaces and arts for
everyone in College Station. The plan provides policy direction for an integrated
mobility network, exceptional City services, and carefully managed, fiscally responsible
growth. Effective collaboration across City departments and with regional partners
is key to achieve and implement the plan’s vision, goals, and actions. The plan strives
to identify, create, conserve, and connect places of distinction – those areas that make
College Station unique and contribute to the City’s character and sense of place.
DISTINCTIVE
PLACES2
AMENDED OCTOBER 12, 2023Page 131 of 338
19CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Goal
Vibrant and distinct districts, attractive neighborhoods, revitalized gateways and corridors, and conserved
natural areas, grounded in environmental stewardship and resiliency.
Purpose
How land is used – including its appearance, physical arrangement, and development intensity –
contributes significantly to the community’s character and its sense of place with far-reaching and long-
term impacts. The City must balance and encourage infill, redevelopment, and new development in
appropriate areas to accommodate an increasing population while maintaining the integrity and character
of established neighborhoods. Revitalization, where needed, is also essential to maintaining College
Station’s character.
Sound planning ensures that the City can accommodate needed development, that development can be
adequately served with public services, and that its impacts can be managed to maintain compatibility and
to promote the character desired by College Station’s residents. Planning establishes effective strategies
for future growth, infill, and appropriate redevelopment while balancing market opportunities, protecting
and enhancing neighborhood character, creating and preserving unique districts and corridors, conserving
natural areas, and creating a more resilient community.
The 10-year update to the Comprehensive Plan places a renewed focus on infill and redevelopment in
strategic locations to accommodate population growth while ensuring the long-term fiscal sustainability of
the City. Infill and redevelopment opportunities more efficiently utilize existing infrastructure, facilities, and
City staff resources by encouraging growth in areas with existing capacity to maximize efficiency.
The Comprehensive Plan contains future land use categories that serve as policy guides and set
expectations for how land within the City should be developed and used in the future. The terms future
land use and zoning often get confused, but they are separate tools and processes. Future land use serves
as a guide for how areas of the City may develop in the future. In contrast, zoning regulates how a specific
property can be developed and used today. Map 2.2, Future Land Use & Character is used to guide
decisions about infrastructure investment and zoning changes.
This chapter serves as the plan’s foundation and encompasses many interrelated components as land
use and development patterns are fundamental to the other topic chapters including creating strong
neighborhoods (Chapter 3), a prosperous economy (Chapter 4), engaging natural spaces and arts (Chapter
5), an integrated mobility network (Chapter 6), exceptional City services (Chapter 7), and carefully managed,
fiscally responsible growth (Chapter 8). Effective collaboration across City departments and with regional
partners (Chapter 9) is vital to achieve and implement the plan’s vision, goals, and actions (Chapter 10).
Page 132 of 338
20CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
This chapter includes a series of maps that depict the City’s land use strategies and goals visually, including
Map 2.1, Planning Areas, Map 2.2, Future Land Use & Character, and Map 2.3, Community Assets &
Image Corridors.
Planning Considerations
Planning input from the community identified various issues and opportunities regarding land use planning,
conservation of natural features, and enhanced community identity and aesthetics. The considerations
highlighted in this section were used in the development of the goal and action recommendations that
follow.
GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
College Station is poised for continued population growth,
which will bring demands for additional housing, shopping,
recreational needs, public facilities, infrastructure, and
services. University students continue to make up a
significant portion of the population, but College Station
is also diversifying in age–those aged 55 and over are the
fastest-growing cohort, increasing by 83.5 percent over
the last decade. The City of College Station is projected
to increase by approximately 35,000 people over the next
decade for a total population estimated to be 162,500
by 2030. The housing demand associated with this
population growth is approximately 14,000 additional
dwelling units. When factoring in assumed build-out of all
existing and known development projects, there is a gap of
approximately 10,000 dwelling units. This additional housing
stock could come from a combination of infill development,
redevelopment projects in existing areas, and new
developments. This housing stock must include a variety
of housing types to meet the needs and demands of all
residents including students, young professionals, families
and non-family households, renters and homeowners, and
the retiree and 55 and older population, with an emphasis
on aging-in-place. For reference, the City had a net gain of
approximately 12,800 housing units over the last decade,
with 6,500 single-family residences and 6,300 multi-family
units added.1
If population and housing demands continue to increase and state legislation restricting annexation remains
in effect, the City will naturally face a greater need for increased density in appropriately targeted areas.
This presents an exciting opportunity to thoughtfully plan for a variety of neighborhoods that accommodate
a wide range of lifestyles for College Station residents. Though the current population density at slightly
more than 2,400 persons per square mile remains low in comparison to other metropolitan areas, the need
for increased density offers opportunities for reinvigorating strategic areas and reimagining the way that
new neighborhoods are designed. The City’s enviable growth prospects necessitate more effective land
use planning and capital investments, as well as diversified housing types including vertical mixed-use
apartments, townhomes, and dense single-family neighborhoods.
1Data provided by City of College Station Planning & Development Services
Page 133 of 338
21CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
COMMUNITY CHARACTER, SUSTAINABILITY & URBAN DESIGN
College Station residents are interested in the character of their neighborhoods, special districts, corridors,
and natural areas that collectively make College Station unique. Effective design also helps to create places
of distinction – places worth remembering and protecting – and contributes significantly to quality of life.
The design of streetscapes and building fronts as well as the treatment of parking and other physical
features all impact how people experience the public realm. This plan speaks to the urban form of the City
(where, when, and how land uses are developed) as well as public realm design (sometimes called urban
design) and its impact on community character and identity.
Residents expressed the desire to preserve natural features for their environmental functions as well as
their contribution to the community’s character, with an emphasis on ensuring that the use or enjoyment
of existing resources does not compromise resource availability for future residents. This is generally
recognized as the definition of sustainability – meeting the needs of current generations without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Combining these desires for unique
places, quality urban design, and development patterns that are sensitive to resident needs and natural
resources, along with the efficient use of infrastructure and City resources, provides a defined vision to
make College Station a more livable and sustainable community.
As College Station grows, it is the residents’ and City’s intent that:
• Infill and redevelopment in strategic locations is prioritized over expansion of the urban area, is
sensitive to existing neighborhoods, and engages residents in infill and redevelopment planning.
• Growth occurs in a sustainable manner to steward limited resources in an efficient and
responsible manner that accommodates an increasing population and mitigates negative impacts
on the natural and built environment. Compact development patterns help minimize sprawl and its
associated impacts and makes sound economic sense for infrastructure provision and City services
(see Chapter 8: Managed Growth).
• New or enhanced residential areas are created with qualities of traditional neighborhoods that
feature a mix of housing types, a balance of owner and renter occupants, where parks and open
space are provided, neighborhood-serving businesses are accessible, and adjacent neighborhoods
and areas are connected in a seamless fashion (see Chapter 3: Strong Neighborhoods).
• Existing neighborhoods are conserved, enhanced, or revitalized with harmonious
improvements, infill development, and compatible adjacent land uses that enhance the established
neighborhood’s character (see Chapter 3: Strong Neighborhoods).
• Unique corridors and districts are developed, enhanced, and conserved that foster vibrant
places, streets, and natural corridors that contribute to the community’s character and sense of
place.
• Rural areas are preserved to protect streams, trees, pastures, and open areas that contribute
significantly to the character of rural areas.
• Natural resources are managed and conserved through sound stewardship practices to
protect streams, wooded areas, and open spaces that provide habitat for a variety of plants and
wildlife, convey and clean stormwater, improve air quality, and add to the City’s character and
identity (see Chapter 5: Engaging Spaces).
Page 134 of 338
22CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• Sustainable site design and low impact
development practices are utilized to
mitigate stormwater and prevent flooding,
avoid soil erosion and mitigate urban heat
island effect, encourage tree preservation
and planting programs, reduce energy
consumption and pursue renewable
technologies, conserve and reuse water,
encourage native and adapted vegetation,
and minimize waste and resource
consumption, among others.
• Multiple mobility mode options are
available to access neighborhoods, major
employers and attractions, and the wider
community, and streets are designed in a
context-sensitive manner. The design of a
street should be a function of both its role as
a mobility corridor and its place context (see
Chapter 6: Integrated Mobility).
• Streetscapes are designed at a human-
scale and contribute positively to the way
people navigate and experience the City.
Effective streetscapes prioritize elements
like wide sidewalks, pedestrian-scaled
streetlights, wayfinding signs, and canopy
trees. New district and corridor plans, as well
as context-sensitive street design, will help
elevate streets from utilitarian elements of
the community to special places in their own
right.
• Public facilities are located and designed
to contribute to community character and
make a statement about the community’s
values and expectations. A well-designed
library or community center fits into a
neighborhood, enabling residents to walk
safely from their homes and providing a
place for neighbors to gather, and contributes
positively to that neighborhood’s character
and reinforces the public facility as an integral
part of the community.
• Public spaces are highly visible and
accessible to all residents and visitors.
Public spaces like plazas, amphitheaters, and
pedestrian malls that are well designed and
safe foster social interactions and community
identity.
Page 135 of 338
23CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Existing Land Use
Future land use and character is grounded in the
current use of land and the prevailing character.
An overview of the current conditions is necessary
prior to forming policies for the future use of land
and community character. College Station can be
readily divided into three basic types of existing land
use patterns: urban, suburban, and rural. These are
common terms that should bring immediate images to
mind. Attributes that define these areas contribute to
the identity of College Station.
Urban character is currently concentrated in the
Northgate area. It includes early 20th century lot-line
commercial structures such as those along either side
of College Main, and immediately north of University
Drive (FM 60). More recently constructed structured
parking and multi-story residential projects built close
to the street continue this urban feel. This area includes
vertical, mixed-use development, minimal setbacks,
minimal surface parking lots, and a high level of
pedestrian activity.
Suburban character dominates College Station
largely due to the time period most of the City was
developed (post-World War II), local preferences and
building customs, and the dominance of apartment-
style development to support the student population.
Much of this suburban character is auto-dominated
and consists of land uses that have extensive areas of
parking in relationship to their floor area. Big-box retail
areas and shopping malls are quintessential examples
of this character. Most apartment complexes, duplexes,
and single-family residential developments exhibit
similar auto-oriented character and design.
Some suburban areas of the City exhibit a less auto-
dependent and more walkable character. These areas
retain a balance between green areas (parks and open
space) and the built environment. Often these areas
include parks, schools, and small-scale, neighborhood-
serving businesses. The College Hills area is a good
example of this type of suburban character. There are
also suburban areas that are dominated by open space.
These estate areas exhibit a more rural character with
homes generally placed on large lots. The Foxfire
subdivision is a good example of this type of suburban
land use and character.
Rural areas that currently exist in and around College
Page 136 of 338
24CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Station are areas that exhibit countryside, agricultural, and natural character. Countryside is typically
dominated by a few lots of estate size or greater fronting a road surrounded by agricultural or natural
lands. The latter two tend to be determined by uses – crop or ranching in agricultural areas and wooded
or savannah lands in natural areas. Rural areas tend to be more sensitive than other character areas to
intrusions from incompatible development. Portions of the City and most of the ETJ are planned to remain
rural and are identified accordingly on Map 2.2, Future Land Use & Character. Additional information
about these areas is contained in Chapter 8: Managed Growth.
Future Land Use
The plan for future uses of land is presented through policy guidance and associated maps. Three
significant land use components work in tandem to identify, create, conserve, and connect places of
distinction – those areas that make College Station unique and contribute to the City’s character and sense
of place. These components are: Planning Areas, Future Land Use & Character, and Community Assets &
Images Corridors. Each component is visually represented by an associated map. Combined, the narrative
and maps capture the City’s policies regarding how and where College Station will grow and change over
the course of the next decade.
• Map 2.1, Planning Areas depicts areas within the city with distinctive character that have existing
small area plans or are priority areas for future focused planning efforts.
• Map 2.2, Future Land Use & Character provides specific detail regarding the desired future use
and character of all land within the City and ETJ.
• Map 2.3, Community Assets & Image Corridors visually portrays community assets, both natural
and man-made, that contribute to the character and identity of the City.
Page 137 of 338
25CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PLANNING AREAS
The policy guidance within this section and Map 2.1, Planning Areas are intended to provide a broad
overview of the City’s land use strategy. Significant neighborhoods, districts, corridors, redevelopment
areas, and places that would benefit from future small area planning efforts are identified. Small area plans
are focused planning efforts that provide a more granular level of study and specific actions for a smaller,
defined geographic area to help implement the Comprehensive Plan’s overarching goals. The City has
several existing small areas plans and identified priority areas for additional planning efforts through recent
citizen input and the 10-year plan update.
The basic land use strategy is to strategically accommodate the projected demand for new housing,
businesses, public facilities, and infrastructure needs resulting in multiple places of distinction. This enables
the City to continually strengthen its principal competitive advantage for attracting and retaining residents,
visitors, and new businesses along with the employment and tax revenues that accompany them – that is, a
high quality of life. The land use strategy and planning areas focus on identifying, creating, conserving, and
connecting:
• Strong and sustainable neighborhoods
• Unique districts and corridors, both natural and man-made
• Redevelopment areas that renew, revitalize, and infill underperforming areas of the community
through partnerships with public and private interests
• Rural areas that preserve open spaces and respect the limits of public infrastructure and services,
and
• A context sensitive mobility system that links the community together (as discussed in Chapter
6: Integrated Mobility and visually represented through the Thoroughfare Plan and Bicycle,
Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan)
Neighborhoods & Districts
Neighborhood planning areas are places in which the current land use, character, and identity will generally
remain and be enhanced. Among other activities, these plans identify appropriate and compatible land
uses and design for vacant lands within the neighborhood and its area of influence. They also designate
areas appropriate for redevelopment. Neighborhood plans typically contain strategies that address existing
challenges (for example, code issues) and identify enhancement actions (such as pedestrian or park
improvements).
Page 138 of 338
26CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
District planning areas present opportunities for a mix of appropriate uses that enhance the unique
characteristics of a defined area of the City. Existing examples include the Wellborn Community Plan which
centers on the unique, rural character of the Wellborn area and the Medical District Master Plan which
focuses on creating a cohesive healthcare and wellness district.
Between 2009 and 2013, residents, staff, and City leadership worked together to create five neighborhood
and small area plans and two district plans. These plans provided strategic recommendations for an area
within a defined timeframe (typically seven years). Once adopted, those recommendations were either
implemented over the planning period or incorporated into relevant parts of the Comprehensive Plan or
other master plans. Occasionally, some action items were not pursued due to changed conditions, project
feasibility, available funding, or waning neighborhood interest. The City established a formal process for
reviewing existing plans and conducted an audit of the five neighborhood and small area plans in 2022.
Nearly 70 percent of actions across all plans were either completed or in progress
as of the audit date, demonstrating a positive implementation success rate.
The audit also analyzed challenges in plan implementation and provided key
recommendations for future small area planning efforts. Based on the audit’s
findings, four of the original five neighborhood and small area plans that were
beyond their planning horizons were retired.
The City will continue pursuing new neighborhood and district planning efforts
for areas facing significant changes or development pressures, or to create or
enhance the unique character of an area.
•Planning Area 1: Wellborn District Plan – Adopted in October 2023, this plan encompasses 929
acres in the southwestern portion of the City, including much of the historic Wellborn community
and focuses on retaining the rural character of the area. The community is facing continued
development pressures for growth, and the plan directs that pressure into appropriate areas while
preserving, supporting, and enhancing the rural character of the area. The zoning districts allowed
within the Wellborn District Plan boundary are limited to: Wellborn zoning districts, BP Business
Park, BPI Business Center, CI Commercial Industrial, R Rural, and NAP Natural Areas Protected.
•Planning Area 2: Medical District Master Plan - Adopted in October 2012, the Medical District
Master Plan creates a focused healthcare and wellness district that includes the City’s major
hospitals and medical facilities. This area is generally located along State Highway 6 near the Rock
Prairie Road interchange, which is one of the primary gateways into the City as one approaches
from the south. The plan links medical facilities into a cohesive district with supporting commercial
and residential areas that are being realized through the Midtown Reserve & City Center master
planned development. The City-owned Midtown Business Park, consisting of over 250 acres, is
located in this general area as well, providing economic development opportunities for office, light
and heavy-industrial, and limited commercial uses. There are also significant natural features in the
area – branches of Lick Creek and Spring Creek – and these should continue to be incorporated
into the district as parks, greenway trails, and open space. Future development should also continue
cohesive identity elements such as signage, landscaping, and design that visually tie the district
together.
•Planning Area 3: Wolf Pen Creek District - This district along the Wolf Pen Creek corridor
combines parks, arts, and commerce by linking a variety of private and public facilities together
with an urban greenway. This area has been the subject of considerable planning efforts, including
specific Wolf Pen Creek Design Standards (within the Unified Development Ordinance), and
substantial public and private investment. Future planning should build upon these existing efforts to
expand the district’s reach into the adjacent areas of influence, resulting in a more urban character.
Page 139 of 338
27CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Redevelopment
Portions of the City are identified for focused redevelopment activities. Within these areas it is anticipated
that a change in use – and, if appropriate, character – requires some form of direct intervention by the City.
This intervention may involve regulation (e.g., City-initiated rezoning), investment (e.g., capital expenditure
on infrastructure), or incentives (e.g., fast-tracking of a project or density bonuses). This stands in contrast to
areas that experience changes in use based on market opportunities alone. Some of these redevelopment
areas may overlap established neighborhood areas, districts, or corridors and careful attention and cohesive
planning will be needed to provide appropriate transitions between redeveloping and existing areas.
• Planning Area 4: Northgate District & Redevelopment Area - This area serves as the City’s
primary entertainment district and represents the City’s only current urban character area. This area
has been and will continue to be the subject of considerable planning along with substantial public
and private investment. These efforts should be guided by the Northgate District Design Standards
(within the Unified Development Ordinance), the Mobility Study and Operations Plan, and any
emerging plans for the area. Continued development and redevelopment efforts in the Northgate
District should enhance the vibrant entertainment district and include vertical mixed-use projects,
retail and entertainment uses, and tourist attractions.
• Planning Area 5: Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan - Adopted in September 2023, the
Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan creates a coordinated strategy for future change and
redevelopment along two of the busiest corridors in the city: Texas Avenue and University Drive
(FM 60). The plan is divided into two subareas: The Crossing and Eastgate Main. The Crossing
is the primary gateway into the City of College of Station and Texas A&M University for visitors
entering from Bryan on Texas Avenue and from State Highway 6 along the University Drive (FM
60) hospitality corridor. The Crossing generally includes the area surrounding the intersection,
east along University Drive (FM 60) to Tarrow Street, and south along Texas Avenue to Lincoln
Avenue. The Crossing anticipates a high level of redevelopment, vertical mixed-use structures,
significant increases in housing options and housing stock, an enhanced and expanded multi-modal
transportation system, and a denser urban form. Eastgate Main is centered at the intersection of
Texas Avenue and New Main Drive/Walton Drive. It contains one of College Station’s historic retail
shopping centers, the College Station City Hall and Visitor Center, and is adjacent to the College
Hills Estates neighborhood. Eastgate Main is bounded by Foster Avenue, George Bush Drive East,
Texas Avenue, and Lincoln Avenue, where it interfaces with The Crossing subarea. Eastgate Main
anticipates both vertical and horizontal mixed-use developments that honor the historic commercial
structures along Walton Drive while providing additional housing opportunities along Foster Avenue.
Page 140 of 338
28CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• Planning Area 6: Harvey Road Redevelopment Area – This section of Harvey Road includes
newer commercial areas and a number of underperforming commercial and older multi-family
properties and apartment complexes. This area also includes the Post Oak Mall, which will
likely need to reposition itself in the near future to remain competitive. This presents an exciting
opportunity to evolve into a denser area of the City, including vertical and horizontal mixed-use
developments, which could compliment the adjacent Wolf Pen Creek District. During the 10-year
Comprehensive Plan evaluation, residents and City leadership expressed interest in alternative
options for future redevelopment and revitalization of this area, indicating a need for additional study
and engagement.
• Planning Area 7: George Bush Drive & Wellborn Road (FM 2154) Redevelopment Area - This
area includes a number of underperforming commercial properties and poor-quality residences
that, due to planned road changes to the George Bush Drive and Wellborn Road (FM 2154)
intersection along with the area’s proximity to Texas A&M University, are poised for redevelopment.
Much of the area is currently subdivided into small lots, making it difficult to consolidate land for
redevelopment. The presence of existing residences and businesses, and proximity to established
neighborhoods and the university campus, requires careful site planning and building design.
Redevelopment planning efforts should focus on bringing vertical and horizontal mixed-use and
other aspects of urban character to this portion of the City, while providing contextually appropriate
transitions to established areas of the Southside neighborhood. During the 10-year plan evaluation
residents were divided on alternative options for this area, indicating the need for further study
and public engagement. Residents strongly opposed changes to interior portions of the Southside
neighborhood across from Texas A&M University, thus future planning efforts within the Southside
neighborhood should center on the area surrounding the George Bush Drive and Wellborn Road
(FM 2154) intersection. These planning efforts will be prioritized and synced with the proposed road
changes, once the timing is known.
Gateway Corridors
Gateway corridors serve as functional and focal entry points into the City and its unique districts,
neighborhoods, redevelopment, and natural areas. These gateway corridors are prominent routes for
College Station residents and visitors alike. An effective gateway corridor establishes a positive impression
and identity that reinforces the community’s character. Several of these corridors serve as a link between
districts, further reinforcing their importance. Identity and beautification elements, such as decorative
markers and themed wayfinding signs, should be placed along these corridors. Additionally, landscaping
and streetscape elements should be unified and significant along these corridors. These corridors also offer
the opportunity for the placement of public art and other design elements.
• Planning Area 8: Presidential Gateway & BioCorridor - This area located near the intersection
of State Highway 47 and Raymond Stotzer Parkway (FM 60) is a main entryway into the City from
the west. It is adjacent to the Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Easterwood Airport,
and nearby the RELLIS Campus in Bryan. The BioCorridor contains interconnected, master planned
properties specializing in corporate office, biomanufacturing, research and development, and
industrial uses. The area’s character is managed and regulated jointly by the cities of College Station
and Bryan largely through the BioCorridor Planned Development District. Future development
should build upon existing assets in the area and continue to enhance this primary gateway into the
City through cohesive design, landscaping, and signage.
Page 141 of 338
29CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• Planning Area 9: Hospitality Corridor - This area along University Drive (FM 60), spanning
from Tarrow Street and Fire Station #6 to the interchange at State Highway 6, is one of the main
entryways into the City from the highway. A number of hotels and restaurants are currently located
along this corridor. The focus of this corridor should be linking current and future hospitality facilities
into a cohesive corridor along with adjacent redevelopment areas that, over time, could emerge
as another urban character area. The plan should include identity elements such as signage,
landscaping, and enhanced design to visually tie the corridor together.
• Planning Area 10: Municipal Center Corridor - This area located along Krenek Tap Road
between State Highway 6 and Texas Avenue includes Stephen C. Beachy Central Park, the original
City cemetery, and several municipal facilities. The area also includes significant natural features
such as Bee Creek and several wooded areas. Plans for this corridor should enhance the municipal
facilities and support a mix of residential and commercial activities with an emphasis on cohesive
design that integrates the natural features of the area.
• Planning Area 11: Harvey Mitchell Corridor - This is an area of Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM
2818) generally around its intersection with Texas Avenue extending eastward to State Highway
6. This area includes a significant amount of floodplain area adjacent to Bee Creek and significant
road frontage along Harvey Mitchell Parkway and Texas Avenue. The focus of this plan should be
the development of an urban area that incorporates the natural features of the area and design
elements that positively contribute to two prominent entries into the core of the City.
• Planning Area 12: Longmire & Highway 6 Frontage Road Corridor – This gateway corridor
is a major entryway into the City from State Highway 6. The area is generally defined as the State
Highway 6 Frontage Road at its intersection with Texas Avenue between Deacon Drive to Rock
Prairie Road and west to Longmire Drive. The corridor contains a series of older, underperforming,
and in many cases nonconforming, commercial and multi-family uses. As a key corridor, future
planning efforts should focus on redevelopment opportunities and identity enhancements such as
signage, landscaping, and design to create a more visually cohesive entryway and corridor.
• Planning Area 13: Wellborn Road (FM 2154) and William D. Fitch Corridor (State Highway
40) – This area is generally the southwestern gateway into the City near the intersection of Wellborn
Road (FM 2154) and William D. Fitch Parkway (State Highway 40). There is a future grade-separated
crossing at the intersection of these roads that will significantly change the area’s character. The
land west of the railroad and generally south of Rock Prairie Road is largely undeveloped but limited
in development potential due to sewer capacity constraints. A plan for this area should focus on
opportunities for visual enhancements such as signage, landscaping, and enhanced design to
Page 142 of 338
30CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
create a more attractive entryway, along with compatible land uses such as light industrial that can
operate within existing constraints.
Natural Corridors
Natural corridors exhibit opportunities for resource conservation and recreational activities. Examples
include the Carter Creek and Lick Creek Corridors. Each of these will be the subject of a future district or
corridor plan.
• Planning Area 14: Bee Creek Corridor - This corridor contains Bee Creek, which is a significant
stream that traverses many neighborhoods in the core of the City. This watershed has been the location
of intense development resulting in significant alteration to the stream. The focus of this corridor should
be on the continued restoration of the creek, development of recreational opportunities, and expansion
of its role in linking adjacent areas.
• Planning Area 15: Carter Creek Corridor - This corridor consists of the entirety of Carter Creek
and its associated floodplain. Carter Creek is a significant natural feature stretching along much of the
eastern edge of the City and linking College Station, Bryan, and the remainder of Brazos County. The
focus of this corridor should be the protection of this natural feature and development of recreational
opportunities that could cohesively connect the region.
• Planning Area 16: Lick Creek Corridor - This area includes Lick Creek Park and the surrounding
area. Lick Creek Park is one of the most significant natural features in College Station. It offers a unique
natural setting and protects much of the Lick Creek watershed along with a large, wooded area and the
Page 143 of 338
31CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
habitats of rare and endangered species. The focus of this corridor should be the continued protection
of the natural features, additional recreational and educational opportunities, and the expansion of its
role in linking adjacent areas.FUTURE LAND USE & CHARACTER
Future land use serves as a guide for how all property within the City may develop in the future. Each
future land use category contains a character-based description and overall intent of the category, along
with generally appropriate zoning districts that help achieve the desired character. There are also example
photographs from existing developments in College Station or other communities to visually illustrate the
desired development characteristics.
The appropriateness of zoning change requests will be considered using multiple criteria including, but not
limited to, whether the request is aligned with Map 2.2, Future Land Use & Character, whether changed
or changing conditions exist in the area, compatibility with existing uses and development patterns, impact
on environmentally sensitive and natural areas, impact on and timing of infrastructure, and consistency
with all goals and strategies of the Comprehensive Plan. The zoning districts listed as generally appropriate
under each future land use category are meant to provide guidance and do not represent affirmative
support of each listed zoning district.
The land use strategies
discussed in this chapter
are further clarified by the
future land use category
descriptions and are visually
portrayed in Map 2.2, Future
Land Use & Character.
The associated acreages
in each land use category
are compiled in Table 2.1,
Summary of Future Land
Use Acreages.
With the 10-year
Comprehensive Plan update
several changes were
made to the future land use
categories and map based on
community and stakeholder
input, changing conditions,
and best practices identified
during the evaluation
process. These changes
include renaming, simplifying
and reducing the number of
categories, refining the land
use definitions, creating new
categories to encourage
and support emerging
development forms, and
reconsidering how land uses apply to various areas of the City.
Table 2.1 - Summary of Future Land Use Acreages
Future Land Use City Limits ETJ
Urban Center 335.6
Neighborhood Center 1,255.9
General Commercial 1,855.0 159.4
Neighborhood Commercial 523.9
Business Center 968.0 874.0
Urban Residential 963.9
Mixed Residential 1,093.4 209.1
Suburban Residential 6,342.9 577.7
Estate Residential 2,822.7 885.0
Rural 7.9 57,785.4
Neighborhood Conservation 1,795.7
Medical 170.9
Wellborn 434.6 38.0
Institutional/Public 952.4 4.2
Texas A&M University 4,839.8 44.4
Parks & Greenways 870.4 *17.3
Natural & Open Areas 5,131.9 41,804.3
TOTALS 30,364.9 102,398.8
*Note: The 17.3 acres of Parks & Greenways in the ETJ is the park within the Southern Pointe subdivision, which will be annexed into the City in the future per their development agreement
Page 144 of 338
111
222
444
555 666
777
888
999
10100
111111
121212
131313
141414 151515
161616WILLIAM D. FITCH PKWYF
M
2154FM 2818GEORGE BUSH DRTE
XA
S
AV
E SUNIVERSITY DRSH
6
S
S
H
6
S
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
FLOODPLAIN
5 MILE ETJ
CITY LIMITS
BRYAN
MAIN CORRIDORS
* EXISTING PLANNING EFFORT OR DESIGN STANDARDS
REDEVELOPMENT AREAS
4.NORTHGATE DISTRICT*
5.NORTHEAST GATEWAY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN*
6.HARVEY ROAD AREA
7.GEORGE BUSH DRIVE & WELLBORN ROAD AREA
GATEWAY CORRIDORS
8.PRESIDENTIAL GATEWAY & BIOCORRIDOR*
9.HOSPITALITY CORRIDOR*
HARVEY MITCHELL CORRIDOR11.
10.MUNICIPAL CENTER CORRIDOR
WELLBORN ROAD & WILLIAM D. FITCH CORRIDOR13.
12.LONGMIRE & HIGHWAY 6 FRONTAGE ROAD CORRIDOR
NATURAL CORRIDORS
14.BEE CREEK CORRIDOR
15.CARTER CREEK CORRIDOR
16.LICK CREEK CORRIDOR
NEIGHBORHOODS & DISTRICTS
1.
3.
2.
WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN*
MEDICAL DISTRICT MASTER PLAN*
WOLF PEN CREEK DISTRICT*
Planning Areas
MAP 2.1
Page 145 of 338
ETJETJETJ
CITY LIMITSCITY LIMITSCITY LIMITS
BRYANBRYANBRYAN
GEORGE BUSH DRUNIVERSITY DRSOU THWES TPKWYTE
XA
S
AV
E
S
DEACON DRROCKPRAIRIERDHARVEY RDGRAHAM RDEAGLE AVEBARRON RDHOLLEGREENS PRAIRIE RDMANDRS
H
6
S
S
H
6
SWILLIAM D. FITCH PKWYFM 60FM
2
1
5
4FM 2818
URBAN CENTER
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
BUSINESS CENTER
URBAN RESIDENTIAL
MIXED RESIDENTIAL
SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL
ESTATE RESIDENTIAL
RURAL
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION
MEDICAL
INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
PARKS & GREENWAYS
NATURAL & OPEN AREAS
REDEVELOPMENT AREAS!!!!!!Future Land Use
& Character
*NOTE: A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHALL NOT
CONSTITUTE ZONING REGULATIONS OR ESTABLISH
ZONING BOUNDARIES
MAP 2.2
Page 146 of 338
34CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Future Land Use Categories
URBAN CENTER
Areas that are appropriate for the most intense development
and mix of uses arranged in a compact and walkable pattern.
These areas will tend to consist of multi-story residential,
commercial, and office uses that may be mixed vertically
within mixed-use structures or horizontally in an integrated
manner. Urban Centers should also incorporate consolidated
parking facilities, access to transportation alternatives, open
space and recreational facilities, and public uses.
Building Height: 5 stories average
Mobility: Walking, bicycling, transit, automobile
Intent
• Create and reinforce walkable activity centers with
small blocks that are connected to surrounding
development and include a mix of complementary
uses
• Accommodate a mix of building types including
freestanding and attached structures that frame
attractive pedestrian zones between buildings and
streets
• Encourage commercial uses along primary streets
• Encourage vertical mixed-use structures with ground-
floor retail in appropriate locations such as along
major corridors
• Support multi-family residential as a secondary
component of a center
• Encourage shared surface parking located behind
buildings or to the side of buildings, structured
parking, and on-street parking where possible
Generally appropriate zoning districts:
Mixed-use, Northgate zoning (in Northgate only), Wolf Pen
Creek zoning (in Wolf Pen Creek only)
Page 147 of 338
35CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
Areas that are appropriate for a mix of uses arranged in a
compact and walkable pattern at a smaller scale than Urban
Centers. These areas consist of residential, commercial, and
office uses arranged horizontally in an integrated manner
and may be mixed vertically within structures. Neighborhood
Centers should also incorporate consolidated parking
facilities, access to transportation alternatives, open space and
recreational facilities, and public uses.
Height: 3 stories average
Mobility: Walking, bicycling, transit, automobile
Intent
• Create and reinforce walkable activity centers that are
connected to surrounding development and include a
mix of complementary uses
• Accommodate a mix of building types that frame
attractive pedestrian spaces
• Support vertical mixed-use structures with ground-floor
retail in appropriate locations such as along corridors or
major intersections
• Encourage all land generally within 300 to 500 feet of
streets classified as major collectors or higher to be
commercial uses, unless providing vertical mixed-use
structures with residential uses on upper floors. The
exact location and extent can be modified if creating
commercial nodes, such as at intersections, and/or if
other characteristics of the site require an alternative
design that provides a mixture of uses in an integrated
manner.
• Stand-alone commercial uses with a preferred emphasis
on urban form may be allowed if the size and scale of
the property and/or development does not adequately
support mixing uses in a horizontal manner
• Support multi-family residential as a complementary
secondary component of a center that includes
commercial and/or office uses
• Encourage shared surface parking located behind or to
the side of buildings (with some limited parking in front
of buildings), structured parking, and on-street parking
where possible
Generally appropriate zoning districts:
Mixed-use, Wolf Pen Creek zoning (in Wolf Pen Creek only),
commercial and multi-family zoning may be considered in
some circumstances if designed in an integrated manner
through a Planned Development District with a preferred
emphasis on urban form
Page 148 of 338
36CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
Concentrated areas of commercial activities that cater
to both nearby residents and to the larger community or
region. Generally, these areas tend to be large and located
along regionally significant roads. Due to their context, these
areas tend to prioritize automobile mobility.
Height: 1-2 stories average
Mobility: Primarily automobile, but accessible by
walking, bicycling, and transit
Intent
• Accommodate a wide range of commercial uses
• Concentrate future commercial development at
major intersections
• Provide connectivity to surrounding bicycle and
pedestrian networks and provide safe pedestrian
facilities within sites
• Encourage transitions in building height and mass
when adjacent to residential neighborhoods
• Support multi-family residential as secondary uses
on a site
• Encourage shared surface parking
Generally appropriate zoning districts:
General commercial, office, and mixed-use zoning
Page 149 of 338
37CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
Areas of commercial activities that cater primarily to
nearby residents. These areas tend to be smaller format
than general commercial and located adjacent to major
roads along the fringe of residential areas. Design of
these structures is compatible in size, architecture, and lot
coverage with surrounding residential uses.
Height: 1-2 stories average
Mobility: Primarily automobile, but accessible by
walking, bicycling, and transit
Intent
• Accommodate limited commercial services compared to
General Commercial
• Provide pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to
surrounding neighborhoods and nearby public uses
(schools, parks, etc.)
• Support some residential uses that are compatible with
the surrounding neighborhood character
• Encourage transitions in building height and mass when
adjacent to residential neighborhoods
• In a walkable neighborhood context, locate new
buildings near the street and accommodate parking to
the side or rear of buildings with some limited parking in
front of buildings and accommodate on-street parking
where possible
Generally appropriate zoning districts:
Suburban commercial and office zoning.
Within the Wellborn District, limited to Wellborn Commercial
zoning.
Page 150 of 338
38CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
BUSINESS CENTER
Areas that include office, research, or industrial uses
that may be planned and developed as a unified project.
Generally, these areas need convenient access to arterial
roadways.
Height: Varies
Mobility: Primarily automobile
Intent
• Accommodate a variety of large footprint buildings
• Accommodate commercial and service uses within
Business Centers
• Accommodate pedestrian, bicycle, and transit
connectivity to and within Business Centers
• Provide buffering through landscaping and building
placement where large-scale employment sites are
adjacent to residential areas
Generally appropriate zoning districts:
Business park, industrial, and commercial industrial zoning
Page 151 of 338
39CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
URBAN RESIDENTIAL
Areas that are appropriate for a range of high-density multi-
family and attached residential development in various
forms including townhomes, apartment buildings, mixed-
use buildings, and limited non-residential uses that are
compatible with the surrounding area.
Height: 3 stories average
Mobility: Walking, bicycling, transit, automobile
Intent
• Accommodate a wide range of attractive multi-
family housing for a diverse population. Buildings
may be clustered and grouped. Building setback
from street varies but is generally consistent within a
development
• Provide vehicular and pedestrian connectivity
between developments
• Accommodate streetscape features such as
sidewalks, street trees, and lighting
• Support commercial, service, office uses, and
vertical mixed-use within redevelopment areas
Generally appropriate zoning districts:
Multi-family, townhouse, mixed-use, and limited suburban
commercial zoning
Page 152 of 338
40CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MIXED RESIDENTIAL
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential
development including, townhomes, duplexes, small multi-
family buildings (3-12 unit), and limited small-lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and
redevelopment that allows original character to evolve.
These areas may serve as buffers between more intense
multi-family residential or mixed-use development and
suburban residential or neighborhood conservation areas.
Height: Varies (generally 2-3 stories)
Mobility: Walking, bicycling, transit, automobile
Intent
• Accommodate a walkable pattern of small lots, small
blocks, and well-connected street pattern
• Accommodate streetscape features such as
sidewalks, street trees, and lighting
• Encourage community facilities, parks, and
greenways within neighborhoods
• Support neighborhoods with a mix of housing types
and where larger or more dense housing is located
near community facilities or adjacent to commercial
or neighborhood centers
Generally appropriate zoning districts:
Duplex, townhouse, middle housing, and limited-scale
single-family
Page 153 of 338
41CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL
Primarily single-family residential areas that consist of low
to moderate density single-family lots. These areas may also
include limited townhomes, duplexes, other housing types,
and some non-residential uses that are compatible with
surrounding single-family areas. Development types tend to
be highly consistent within a subdivision or neighborhood.
Residential lot size requirements are larger within the
Wellborn District and limited to single-family lots.
Height: 1-2 stories
Mobility: Primarily automobile, but accessible by walking,
bicycling, and transit to surrounding neighborhood services
and centers
Intent
• Accommodate streetscape features such as
sidewalks, street trees, and lighting
• Support neighborhoods with a mix of housing types
• Encourage community facilities, parks, and
greenways within neighborhoods
• When establishing new residential areas or
expanding existing developments, provide
pedestrian and vehicular connectivity between
adjacent developments
Generally appropriate zoning districts:
General and restricted suburban zoning.
Within the Wellborn District, limited to Wellborn Restricted
Suburban zoning.
Page 154 of 338
42CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ESTATE RESIDENTIAL
Primarily single-family residential areas that have a low level
of development activities. These areas are appropriate for
very low-density residential lots of one-acre or greater lot
sizes or average 20,000 square feet lots when clustered
around open space. Residential lot size requirements are
larger within the Wellborn District.
Height: 1-2 stories
Mobility: Primarily automobile
Intent
• Support a wide range of lot sizes, long blocks, and
curvilinear streets. Buildings tend to be located
greater than 30 feet from a fronting street.
• When establishing new residential areas or
expanding existing developments, provide
pedestrian and vehicular connectivity between
adjacent developments
Generally appropriate zoning districts:
Estate, rural, and manufactured home park zoning. Within
the Wellborn District, limited to Wellborn Estate zoning.
Page 155 of 338
43CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION
Residential areas that are essentially “built-out” and are
not likely to be the focus of extensive infill development
or redevelopment. These areas often were platted before
current development regulations were in place often
resulting in nonconforming situations. These areas are
appropriate for overlays or zoning classifications that
provide additional character protection and address
nonconforming issues.
Height: 1-2 stories
Mobility: Walking, bicycling, transit, automobile; on-street
parking and private off-street parking
Intent
• Maintain the existing housing stock, lot patterns,
and character of neighborhoods
• Support infill housing that fits-in with neighboring
homes (scale, placement, use, etc.)
• Address nonconforming lot issues through flexible
development regulations
• Maintain established trees
Generally appropriate zoning districts:
General and restricted suburban, single-family overlays
Page 156 of 338
44CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
Areas owned by Texas A&M University and are appropriate
for campus development as described in the Texas A&M
Campus Master Plan and related documents.
INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC
Areas that are, and are likely to remain, in some form of
institutional or public activity. Examples include schools,
libraries, municipal facilities, and major utilities.
MEDICAL
Areas appropriate for medically related uses and supporting
office, commercial, and residential uses. The medical
land use designation surrounding Rock Prairie and State
Highway 6 is further detailed in the Medical District
Master Plan, which envisions a wide array of medical
and supporting services and activities concentrated in
the district. This includes the two major hospitals in close
proximity to residential neighborhoods, neighborhood
centers, offices, and commercial uses.
Height: Varies
Mobility: Walking, bicycling, transit, automobile
Generally appropriate zoning districts:
Varies
Page 157 of 338
45CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PARKS & GREENWAYS
Areas that are permanently protected from development.
Such areas are preserved for their natural function or
for parks, recreation, or greenways opportunities. These
areas include, publicly owned open space, conservation
easements, greenway trails, and public parks.
NATURAL & OPEN AREAS
This land use designation is generally for areas that
represent a constraint to development and that should be
conserved for their natural function or open space qualities.
These areas include floodplains, riparian buffers, common
areas, and open space. The boundaries of the Natural &
Open Areas land use are illustrative, and the exact location
of floodplains and other physical constraints are determined
during the development process.
Generally appropriate zoning districts
Natural areas protected
RURAL
Areas that, due to public service limitations, inadequate
public infrastructure, or a prevailing rural or agricultural
character, should have very limited development activities.
These areas will tend to include a mix of large acreages
(ranches and farmsteads) and limited large-lot (two acre
or larger) residential developments. Open space is the
dominant feature of these areas.
Height: Varies
Mobility: Primarily automobile
Generally appropriate zoning districts
Rural and manufactured home park zoning
Page 158 of 338
46CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Community Assets & Images Corridors
The physical design and appearance of the built environment – what buildings, streets, and parks look
like – contributes significantly to the character and identity of the City. This section identifies many of the
community’s unique assets and provides general policy guidance regarding suburban and urban design,
streets and streetscape design, public buildings and facilities, image corridors, and gateways. More specific
and detailed guidance will be provided through subsequent neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, as
well as master plans and other studies and plans adopted by the City Council.
COMMUNITY ASSETS
College Station has a number of existing assets (both natural and man-made) that contribute significantly
to the character and identity of the City and, thus, are deserving of identification and worthy of policy
guidance. Map 2.3, Community Assets & Image Corridors, visually portrays these assets which
include natural features such as Carter Creek and Lick Creek, connections to the greater region such
as Easterwood Airport, public facilities such as the Texas A&M University campus and Veterans Park,
and various vistas and views. Care should be taken to protect each of these assets from encroachment
by incompatible land uses and from insensitive development activities that would compromise their
contribution to the area’s character and identity.
IMAGE CORRIDORS
Image corridors are delineated on Map 2.3, Community Assets & Image Corridors, reflecting their
importance as routes that many residents and visitors travel and, along the way, form impressions of
College Station. Several of these corridors serve as a link between districts, further reinforcing their
importance. Identity and beautification elements, such as decorative markers and themed wayfinding signs,
should be placed along these corridors. Additionally, landscaping and streetscape elements should be
unified and significant along these corridors. These corridors also offer the opportunity for the placement
of public art and other design elements. Primary image corridors include corridors that carry high volumes
of traffic and move travelers through or along some of the City’s most significant assets. Examples include
State Highway 6, Texas Avenue, and Wellborn Road (FM 2154). Secondary image corridors include corridors
that tend to carry slightly less traffic volume and move travelers mainly through the community’s significant
business or residential areas. Examples include Rock Prairie Road, Harvey Road (FM 30), and portions
of University Drive (FM 60). Image corridors also offer an opportunity to support the City’s resource
conservation objectives through the preservation of open space and other natural features along these key
corridors. Where these corridors cross streams, go through forested areas, or offer attractive vistas, care
should be taken in how bridges are constructed, banks are stabilized, stormwater is managed, trees are
protected, and views are kept unobstructed to maximize the positive impressions gained by these assets.
GATEWAYS
A gateway serves as the symbolic entry point to an area, whether the City, a neighborhood, or a district.
An effective gateway establishes an immediate positive impression that reinforces the character of an area
and is visually harmonious with its surroundings. The key gateways into these areas need specific design
elements and enhancements to create such an experience. For neighborhoods this may be in the form of
landscaping or an entrance monument. For districts and corridors this may be in the form of landscaping,
Page 159 of 338
47CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
streetscape, special lighting, signage, public art, or building design. Along the image corridors at key entry
points to the City this may be in the form of landscaping, special signage, public art, or enhancements to
bridges and overpasses.
Each of the neighborhood area plans, district plans, and corridor plans should address the most effective
means to enhance associated gateways. This section outlines the framework for the most appropriate
manner to address the key gateways into and out of the City as a whole. This plan identifies three levels of
gateways, each with its own specific purpose and related design focus.
Early Image-Setting Gateways are locations
where those approaching the community can first
be engaged and experience College Station’s unique
identity. These areas offer opportunities for tasteful
signage and landscaping that are harmonious with
the surrounding rural areas while announcing one’s
pending arrival into College Station. Examples
of appropriate locations for such enhancements
are the intersection of University Drive/Raymond
Stotzer Parkway (FM 60) and Wellborn Road (FM
2154), the FM 60 crossing of the Brazos River, and
the intersection of State Highway 47 and Raymond
Stotzer Parkway (FM 60).
Secondary Welcoming Gateways are locations
where community identity and themes can be
reinforced through more substantial enhancements.
These may include significant monument signage,
substantial areas of landscaping and tree planting,
and flags. Generally, these are located within the
city limits but prior to arrival in the core of the City
itself. Examples of appropriate locations for such
enhancements are the Rock Prairie Road interchange
with State Highway 6, the intersection of George
Bush Drive and Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818),
and the city limits at South College Avenue.
Primary Arrival Gateways are locations where the
most substantial enhancements should be installed.
These may include significant monument signage,
substantial areas of landscaping and tree planting,
fountains, lighted icons, and large-scale art. Examples
of appropriate locations for such enhancements are
the intersection of Texas Avenue and State Highway 6, the University Drive/Raymond Stotzer Parkway
(FM 60) interchange with Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818), and the intersection of Texas Avenue and
University Drive (FM 60).
For these gateways to succeed, it is essential that common elements be used throughout each of the
three levels. Further, enhancements should be focused and sized properly to have the intended impact.
Enhancements dispersed over a wide area, lacking common elements, and sized inappropriately will have
less of an impact and will miss a critical opportunity to reinforce the character and identity of College
Station.
Page 160 of 338
M AP 2.3
GEORGE BUSH DRGEORGE BUSH DRGEORGE BUSH DRG3
G3
G3
G3
G3
G2
G2
G2
G2
G2
G2
G2
G2
G2G2
G1
G1
G1
G1
G1
G1
A&M
Campus
Vista
A&M
Vista
Open Vista
(A&M Land)
at FM 60
and BrazosRiver
View FromHigh Point
Open Space
Views
at SH 6 and
FM 2154
WOLFWOLFWOLF PENPENPEN CRECRECREEEEKKK
BEEBEEBEECREEKCREEKCREEK
SPRINGSPRINGSPRINGCREE KCREEKCREEK
LICK
LICK
LICK
CREEK
CREEK
CREEK
CARTER
CARTER
CARTER
CREEK
CREEK
CREEK
CARTER
CARTER
CARTER
CR
EE
K
CR
EE
K
CR
EE
K
G2
New Memorial
Cemetery
and Aggie Field
of Honor
Easterwood
Airport
Texas A&MUniversityCampus
BRAZOS R
IVE
RBRAZOS R
IVER NAVASOTANAVASOTANAVASOTARIVERRIVERRIVERTE
XA
S
AV
E S
TE
XA
S
AV
E S
TE
XA
S
AV
E S
WE
L
L
BO
RN
RDWE
L
L
BO
RN
R
DWE
L
L
BO
RN
RD FM 2818FM 2818FM 2818FM 2154FM 2154FM 2154WILLIAM D. FITCH PKWYWILLIAM D. FITCH PKWYWILLIAM D. FITCH PKWY
SH 47SH 47SH 47
RAYMOND ST
OT Z ER PK
RAYM O ND ST
OT Z ER PK
RAYMOND ST
OT Z ER PKWY ROCKROCKROCK PRAIRIEPRAIRIEPRAIRIE RDRDRD
S
H
6
S
S
H
6
S
S
H
6
S
SH
6
SSH
6
SSH
6
SHARVEY RDHARVEY RDHARVEY RDKEY IMAGE / DESIGN
INTERSECTION
G1 PRIMARY ARRIVAL GATEWAY
G2 SECONDARY WELCOMINGGATEWAY
G3 EARLY IMAGE-SETTINGGATEWAY
PUBLIC ART LOCATION
PRIMARY IMAGE CORRIDOR
SECONDARY IMAGECORRIDOR
Community
Assets & Image
Corridors
CITY LIMITS
5 MILE EXTRATERRITORIAL
JURISDICTION (ETJ)
EXISTING UNIQUE
COMMUNITY ASSET AREA
EMERGING / POTENTIAL
UNIQUE COMMUNITY ASSET
AREA
FLOODPLAIN
Page 161 of 338
49CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Strategic & Ongoing Actions
The actions listed below designed to achieve the City’s goal of vibrant and distinct districts, attractive
neighborhoods, revitalized gateways and corridors, and conserved natural areas, grounded in environmental
stewardship and resiliency.
STRATEGIC ACTIONS
2.1 Review and undertake amendments to the Unified Development Ordinance’s zoning districts.
Consider amendments necessary to implement the Future Land Use & Character categories and
definitions.
2.2 Prioritize and undertake detailed plans for priority neighborhoods, districts, corridors, or
redevelopment areas. The City should commit to proactively planning for a limited set of target
areas, as specified in Map 2.1, Planning Areas.
2.3 Creative incentives and programs to revitalize existing areas and established neighborhoods.
This could include façade or landscaping improvement programs or rehabilitation initiatives. New
programs should align with and complement existing City efforts through the Neighborhood
Partnership Program, Neighborhood Grant Program, and proposed property maintenance
programming.
2.4 Evaluate existing policies and create incentives for low impact and sustainable development.
Encourage policies and regulations that incentivize sustainable practices such as energy reduction,
renewable energy, water conservation, protection of natural resources, use of native and adapted
vegetation, adaptive reuse, waste minimization, and stormwater management.
2.5 Pursue feasibility of a tree preservation and/or tree planting incentive program. This could
involve regulatory changes, incentives to preserve existing trees (especially large canopy trees) in
new development and redevelopment projects, requiring replacement of trees that are destroyed or
removed, proactive efforts by the City such as planting trees and installing landscaping along major
road corridors and gateways, or a program where the City or a partner agency provides trees at
reduced cost.
2.6 Create additional incentives for conservation design and evaluate the effectiveness of
cluster development standards in the Unified Development Ordinance. Common incentives
include density bonuses where a project may be permitted a greater total density in exchange for
preservation of common open space areas.
2.7 Integrate parks, greenways, and community facilities within new neighborhoods. Ensure
that parks, greenways, and other types of open spaces are integrated into the design of new
neighborhoods and that appropriate connections are made to existing facilities. Also consider
opportunities and partnerships to locate civic uses (such as recreation centers, schools, libraries)
within new neighborhoods or redevelopment areas.
Page 162 of 338
50CSTX.GOV | COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ONGOING ACTIONS AND POLICY DIRECTION
2.8 Evaluate and update development standards in the Unified Development Ordinance. Evaluate
the effectiveness of development standards such as mobility and connectivity, off-street parking,
building form and design, landscaping and buffers, exterior lighting, or other applicable standards to
achieve desired design form and quality.
2.9 Develop or refine incentives to promote high quality design. Such incentives may include
regulatory (flexible standards, density bonuses), procedural, cost-sharing agreements, and
tax incentives, among others. Incentives could be targeted to specific geographies or types of
development (such as mixed-use or commercial).
2.10 Encourage parking alternatives to support redevelopment opportunities. Use regulatory or
other incentives to encourage residential, commercial, and mixed development models in the City’s
targeted Redevelopment Areas that integrate structured parking, reduced parking requirements, or
shared parking agreements to enable more productive use of the overall site in place of extensive
surface parking.
2.11 Continue to initiate proactive zoning map updates. Amend the zoning map in strategic areas to
encourage transitions to the desired community character and help implement the Future Land Use
& Character Map. Proactive zoning map changes may also encourage redevelopment in targeted
areas.
2.12 Continue beautification programs. Maintain and consider opportunities to expand beautification
partnerships with Keep Brazos Beautiful and other organizations.
Page 163 of 338
11
22
3344
55 66
77
88
99
1010
1111
1212
1313
1414 1515
1616WILLIAM D. FITCH PKWYF
M
2
1
5
4FM 2818GEORGE BUSH DRTE
X
A
S
A
V
E
SUNIVERSITY DRSH
6
S
SH
6
S
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
FLOODPLAIN
5 MILE ETJ
CITY LIMITS
BRYAN
MAIN CORRIDORS
* EXISTING PLANNING EFFORT OR DESIGN STANDARDS
REDEVELOPMENT AREAS
4.NORTHGATE DISTRICT*
5.NORTHEAST GATEWAY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN*
6.HARVEY ROAD AREA
7.GEORGE BUSH DRIVE & WELLBORN ROAD AREA
GATEWAY CORRIDORS
8.PRESIDENTIAL GATEWAY & BIOCORRIDOR*
9.HOSPITALITY CORRIDOR*
HARVEY MITCHELL CORRIDOR11.
10.MUNICIPAL CENTER CORRIDOR
WELLBORN ROAD & WILLIAM D. FITCH CORRIDOR13.
12.LONGMIRE & HIGHWAY 6 FRONTAGE ROAD CORRIDOR
NATURAL CORRIDORS
14.BEE CREEK CORRIDOR
15.CARTER CREEK CORRIDOR
16.LICK CREEK CORRIDOR
NEIGHBORHOODS & DISTRICTS
1.
3.
2.
WELLBORN DISTRICT PLAN*
MEDICAL DISTRICT MASTER PLAN*
WOLF PEN CREEK DISTRICT*
Planning Areas
M AP 2.1
Page 164 of 338
ETJETJ
CITY LIMITSCITY LIMITS
BRYANBRYAN
GEORGE BUSH DRUNIVERSITY DRSOUTH
WEST PKWYTE
X
A
S
A
V
E
S
DEACON DRROCK PRAIRIERDHARVEY RDGRAHAM RDEAGLE AVEBARRON RDHOLLEGREENS PRAIRIE RDMANDRS
H
6
S
S
H
6
SWILLIAM D. FITCH PKWYFM 60F
M
2
1
5
4FM 2818
URBAN CENTER
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
BUSINESS CENTER
URBAN RESIDENTIAL
MIXED RESIDENTIAL
SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL
ESTATE RESIDENTIAL
RURAL
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION
MEDICAL
INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
PARKS & GREENWAYS
NATURAL & OPEN AREAS
REDEVELOPMENT AREAS!!!!!!Future Land Use
& Character
*NOTE: A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHALL NOT
CONSTITUTE ZONING REGULATIONS OR ESTABLISHZONING BOUNDARIES
M AP 2.2
Page 165 of 338
M AP 6.3
Functional
Classification &
Context Class
UNIVERSITY DRUNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRGEORGE BUSH DRSOUT
H
WEST
SOUT
H
WEST PKWYPKWYFM 281
8
FM 281
8
TE
X
A
S
A
V
E
S
TE
X
A
S
A
V
E
S
F
M
2
1
5
4
F
M
2
1
5
4
SH
6
S
SH
6
SHARVEY RDHARVEY RDGRAHAM RDGRAHAM RDBARRON RDBARRON RDHOL
LEMAN
DR
SHOL
LEMAN
DR
S
SH
6
S
SH
6
SWILLIAM D. FITCH PKWYWILLIAM D. FITCH PKWYROCKROCKPRAIRIEPRAIRIE RDRD
GREENS PRAIRIE RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDHWY 30
FM
2
1
5
4
FM
2
1
5
4FM 60FM 60MINOR COLLECTOR
MAJOR COLLECTOR
MINOR ARTERIAL
4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
6 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY
GRADE SEPARATION
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
URBAN CORE
GENERAL URBAN
SUBURBAN
RURAL
CONTEXT ZONES
CITY LIMITS
ETJ
BRYANBRYAN
Page 166 of 338
BRYAN
TEXASAVSGEORGEBUSHDRTEXAS AV
WE
LLB
O
R
N R
DUNIVERSITY DRH A R VEYM ITC HELLPWSVICTORIA AV
E29THST
WELSHAV
WILLIAM D FITCH PWLINCOLN AVHOLLEMANDRUNIVERSITYDREBOONVILLERD
SOUTHWESTPW
N HARVEY MITCHELL PW
STEXASAV
BARRONRDHARVEYRDEVILLAMARIARDWVILLAMARIARDFM 2154TARROW
ST
HOLLEMA N DRECAVITTAV
ANDERSONST
HOLLEMANDRWLEONARD RDDARTMOUTH
S
TGROESBECKSTE
A
R
L
R
U
D
D
E
R
F
W
SBRIARCREST DRS
CO
LLE
GE
AV
RAYMONDSTOTZERPWWSH21
N EARL R
U
D
DER F
W
GEORGEBUSHDRWFINFEATHERRDROCKPRAIRIERD
C A P S T O N E D R
SH 6 SGREENS PRAIRIE RDFM 2154HARV
EYMITCHELLPW
S
RIVERSIDEPW
S
H 6 S
SH 30
FM158
SH 6 S WILLIAM D FITCH PWRIVERSIDEPW RAYMONDSTOTZERPWMAP 2.6
Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesMAP 5.4
GULF STATES UTILITIES EASEMENT
Multi-use Path Proposed
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed
Brazos County
College Station City Limits
Easterwood Airport
CSISD Property
Texas A&M University Property
College Station Parks
College Station Greenway
CSISD Schools
Brazos Streets
Bike Route Proposed
Bike Route Existing
Bike Lane Funded
Bike Lane Existing
0 10.5 Miles
Bike Facility Proposed
Multi-use Path Existing
Multi-use Path Funded
College Station ETJ
Page 167 of 338
BRYAN
GULF STATES UTILITIES EASEMENT
TEXASAVSGEORGEBUSHDRTEXAS AV
WE
LLB
O
R
N R
DUNIVERSITY DRH ARVEYMITCH ELLPWSVICTORIA AV
E
2
9
THST
WELSHAV
WIL LI A M DFITCHPWLINCOLN AVHOLLEMANDRUNIVERSITYDREBOONVILLERD
SOUTHWESTPW
N HARVEY MITCHELL PW
STEXASAV
BARRONRDHARVEYRDWVILLAMARIARDTARROWSTHOLLE M A N DRECAVITTAV
ANDERSONST
HOLLEMANDRWLEONARD RDDARTMOUT
H
S
TSOUTHWEST PW EEVILLAMARI
ARDE
A
RL
R
U
D
D
E
R
F
W
SGROESBECKST
FM 2154
S
COLLE
G
E
AV
RAYMONDSTOTZERPWW SH 21N EARL RU
D
D
E
R F
W
GEORGEBUSHDRWFINFEATHERRDROCKPRAIRIERD
C A P S T O N E D R
SH 6 SGREENS PRAIRIE RDFM 2154
H
A
R
VEY
MITCHELLPW
S
RIVERSIDEPW
S
H 6 S
SH 30
FM158
SH 6 S WILLIAM D FITCH PWRAYMONDSTOTZERPWProposed Pedestrian FacilitiesMAP 5.5
Sidewalk Existing
Sidewalk Funded
Sidewalk Proposed
Multi-use Path Proposed
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed
Brazos County
College Station City Limit
Texas A&M University Property
Easterwood Airport
CSISD Property
College Station Parks
College Station Greenway
CSISD Schools
Brazos Streets
0 10.5 Miles
College Station ETJ
Multi-use Path Existing
Multi-use Path Funded
Page 168 of 338
October 5, 2023
Item No. 5.4.
City-Initiated Rezonings to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay (1 of 2)
Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development, Jeff Howell,
Matthew Ellis, Robin Macias, Gabriel Schrum
Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,”
Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by
changing the zoning district boundaries as follows:
a.From MH Middle Housing or R-4 Multi-Family to MH Middle Housing and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay or R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately
2.85 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 10-19, generally located along Cooner
Street;
b.From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy
Overlay for approximately 4.6 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 20-30, and
Block 5, Lots 1-8, generally located along Cooner Street;
c.From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy
Overlay for approximately 5.4 acres being College Vista, Block E, Lots 1-14, Block F, Lots 1-
10, Block G, Lots 1-5, Block H, Lots 1-3, 4R-5R, and 6-7, generally located along Live Oak
Street and Ash Street;
d.From D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy
Overlay for approximately 5.11 acres being University Oaks Phase 2, Block 5, Lots 1-13,
14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21-23, 24A1-24A2, and 25R, generally located along
Dominik Drive;
e.From MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 4.66 acres being Little-Knight Addition, Lots 1-18, generally located along
Aurora Court, and;
f.From GS General Suburban or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay for approximately 23.62 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of
land lying and being situated in the Joseph E. Scott League, Abstract No. 50, and Crawford
Burnett League, Abstract No. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including all of the
W.M. Sparks Subdivision as described by plat recorded in Volume 139, Page 261, and
portions of West Park Addition and West Park 2nd Addition as described by plats recorded in
Volume 102, Page 198 and Volume 128, Page 574, respectively, of the Deed Records of
Brazos County, Texas, as well as subsequent replats of portions of these subdivisions in an
area generally bounded by Luther Street, Montclair Avenue, Grove Street, and Maryem Street;
(Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 26, 2023 City Council Meeting – subject
to change.)
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
•Good Governance
•Neighborhood Integrity
Page 169 of 338
• Diverse & Growing Economy
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval.
Summary: At the August 10 City Council meeting, City staff presented each of these areas along
with the feedback staff received during the public engagement process. At the meeting, the City
Council gave direction for staff to move forward with bringing these areas as official rezoning cases.
After considering the rezoning criteria, City staff has determined that each of these areas are
appropriate for rezoning to MH Middle Housing with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay, or R-4 Multi-
Family with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. The HOO High Occupancy Overlay would allow the
shared housing use as long as the property met the requirements for that use.
This item combines several City-initiated rezoning cases to MH Middle Housing and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay. These requests include areas where at least one lot is already zoned MH Middle
Housing, which was previously done through a privately initiated request. These areas need to be
considered separately and before the ordinance amendment to remove shared housing as a
permitted use from MH Middle Housing. The other City-initiated rezoning cases will be considered
under separate actions.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Area B1, Area B2, and Area D Supporting Materials
2. Area F-G-H Supporting Materials
3. Area J Supporting Materials
4. Area Y Supporting Materials
Page 170 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA B1, AREA B2, AND AREA D
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential and are within the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Area. For the
Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
Area B1 is surrounded by single family homes in the City of Bryan to the north, and duplexes to
the east, south and west. Area B2 is surrounded by single family homes in the City of Bryan to the
north, duplexes to the west and commercial properties to the east and south. Area D is
surrounded by single‐family homes to the north, east and west and single‐family homes and a
multi‐family development to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as new
generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station;
allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in
the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an
appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses
permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for
additional residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the
surrounding areas.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was
determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
Page 171 of 338
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 172 of 338
Page 173 of 338
Page 174 of 338
Page 175 of 338
Page 176 of 338
Page 177 of 338
Page 178 of 338
Page 179 of 338
Page 180 of 338
Page 181 of 338
Page 182 of 338
Page 183 of 338
Page 184 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA F‐G‐H
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by single‐family homes to the north and multi‐family
developments to the south across Dominik Drive. Development pressure continues to grow as
new generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station;
allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in
the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an
appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses
permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for
additional residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the
surrounding areas.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was
determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 185 of 338
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 186 of 338
Page 187 of 338
Page 188 of 338
Page 189 of 338
Page 190 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA J
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject properties are surrounded by A&M Consolidated Middle School to the north, multi‐
family developments to the east, Grace Bible Church to the south, and single‐family homes to the
west. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young
professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging
redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. All of the
properties in this area have already been zoned to MH Middle Housing. This request is to apply
the HOO High Occupancy Overlay to these properties as well, to allow shared housing uses. This
was determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 191 of 338
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 192 of 338
Page 193 of 338
Page 194 of 338
Page 195 of 338
Page 196 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA Y
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential and are part of the George Bush Drive & Wellborn Road (FM 2154)
Redevelopment Area. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the
following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject properties are surrounded by single‐family homes to the north, east, and west, with
the Lincoln Recreation Center complex to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as
new generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station;
allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in
the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an
appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses
permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for
additional residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the
surrounding areas.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was
determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 197 of 338
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 198 of 338
Page 199 of 338
Page 200 of 338
Page 201 of 338
Page 202 of 338
October 5, 2023
Item No. 5.5.
Shared Housing
Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development
Reviewed By CBC: N/A
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Section 6.3 “Types of Use” of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, for modifications to the shared housing use
in the MH Middle Housing zoning district. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October
26, 2023 City Council Meeting – subject to change.)
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
• Good Governance
• Neighborhood Integrity
• Diverse & Growing Economy
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval.
Summary: At the September 14, 2023 City Council meeting, staff gave a presentation on the HOO
High Occupancy Overlay, which the City Council adopted. The intent behind establishing the HOO
High Occupancy Overlay and removing the shared housing use from MH Middle Housing was to
better define where shared housing uses could go. Now that the HOO High Occupancy Overlay has
been established, the next step is to only allow a shared housing use in the MH Middle Housing
zoning district when a HOO High Occupancy Overaly exists. Shared housing is also allowed in areas
that are zoned with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay, are zoned multi-family, or are zoned with a
Northgate district.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Section 6.3 Types of Use redlines
Page 203 of 338
Sec. 6.3. Types of Use.
A. Uses of land or structures which are not expressly listed in the Use Table as permitted uses (P), permitted
uses subject to specific use standards (P*), or conditional uses (C) in a zoning district or planned
development are prohibited uses and shall not be established in that district or planned development.
B. The Administrator shall determine whether or not an unlisted use, that is otherwise prohibited, as stated
above should be processed. In doing so, the Administrator shall utilize purpose statements adopted herein in
conjunction with the applicable zoning district, and consideration of the following criteria:
1. The actual or anticipated characteristics of the activity based on known characteristics of similar
projects in standard planning practice;
2. The relative amount of site area, floor space, and equipment;
3. Relative volumes of sales from each activity;
4. The customer type for each activity;
5. The relative number of employees in each activity;
6. Hours of operation;
7. Building and site arrangement;
8. Vehicles used with the activity and the relative number of vehicle trips generated by the use; and
9. How the use advertises itself.
C. Use Table.
Except where otherwise specifically provided herein, regulations governing the use of land and structures
with the various zoning districts and classifications of planned developments are hereby established as
shown in the following Use Table.
1. Permitted Uses.
A "P" indicates that a use is allowed by right in the respective district. Such uses are subject to all other
applicable regulations of this UDO.
2. Permitted Uses Subject to Specific Standards.
A "P*" indicates a use that will be permitted, provided that the use meets the provisions in the Specific
Use Standards Section below. Such uses are also subject to all other applicable regulations of this UDO.
3. Conditional Uses.
A "C" indicates a use that is allowed only where a conditional use permit is approved by the City
Council. The Council may require that the use meet the additional standards enumerated in the
Specific Use Standards Section below. Conditional uses are subject to all other applicable regulations of
this UDO.
Page 204 of 338
USE TABLE
Specific Uses R WE E WRS RS GS T ** D ** MH MF ** MU ** MHP ** P-MUD ** O SC ** WC GC CI BP ** BPI CU NAP R-1B R-4 ** R-6 ** C-3 ** M-1 M-2 R&D ** WPC ** NG-1 ** NG-2 ** NG-3 ** HOO ** KEY: P = Permitted by Right P* = Permitted Subject to Specific Use Standards C = Conditional Use ** = District with Supplemental Standards (refer to Article 5, District Purpose Statements and Supplemental
Standards)
RESIDENTIAL USES
Assisted
Living/Residential
Care Facility
P P P
Boarding and
Rooming House P P P P P
Courtyard House P*
Dormitory P P P P P P P P
Duplex P P P P P
Extended Care Facility/Convalescent/Nursing Home P P P P P P P P
Fraternity/Sorority P P P P P P
Manufactured Home P
* P
* P
*
Mixed-Use Structure P P P P P P P
Multi-Family P P P P P C
(a) P P P
Multi-Family built
prior to January 2002 P P P P P P P P
Multiplex, Medium P P
Multiplex, Small P P
Shared Housing P(d) P P(d) P(d) P(d) P(d) P(d) P P P P
Single-Family Detached P P P P P P P P P P P
Single-Unit Dwelling P
Split-Lot Duplex P P
Townhouse P P P P P P P Two-Unit Dwelling P
Live-Work Unit P* P
*
P
*
PUBLIC, CIVIC, AND INSTITUTIONAL USES
Educational Facility,
College and
University
P
Educational Facility,
Indoor Instruction P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Educational Facility,
Outdoor Instruction P C C P P P P
Educational Facility,
Primary and Secondary P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Educational Facility, Tutoring P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Page 205 of 338
Educational Facility, Vocational/Trade P P P P P P P P
Governmental Facilities P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P P P* P* P P P P P P* P* P* P P P P P P P P*
Health Care, Hospitals P P
Health Care, Medical Clinics P P P P P P P P P P
Parks P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Places of Worship P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P P P P* P P P P P P* P* P* P P P P P P P P
COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, AND RETAIL USES
Agricultural Use, Barn
or Stable for Private
Stock
P P P
Agricultural Use,
Farm or Pasturage P P P
Agricultural Use,
Farm Product Processing P
Animal Care Facility, Indoor P P P P P P P P P P P P
Animal Care Facility, Outdoor P* P
Art Studio/Gallery P (c) P P P P P P P P P P P P
Car Wash P
*
Commercial Garden,
Greenhouse, or Landscape Maintenance
P* P* P* P* P* P*
Commercial Amusement P P P C C P* P* C P P P
Conference/Convention Center P P P P P P P P
Country Club P P P P P P P P P P
Day Care, Commercial P (c) P P C P P P P P C C P P P P
Drive-In/Thru P* P C P*
Dry Cleaners and Laundry P P P* P* P P* P P P* P* P* P* P*
Fraternal Lodge P P P P P P
Fuel Sales P* P
* P
* P
Funeral Home P P P P
Golf Course or Driving Range P* P* P* P*
Health Club/Sports Facility, Indoor P P P P P P P P P P P P
Health Club/Sports Facility, Outdoor P P* P P P P P* P
Page 206 of 338
Hotel C (b
)
P P P P P P P P
Mobile Food Court C C C C C C C
Night Club, Bar, or Tavern C C C C C P P
Office P (c) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Parking as a Primary Use P P C P P P P*
Personal Service Shop P (c) P P P P P P P P P P P P
Printing/Copy Shop P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Radio/TV
Station/Studio P P P P P P P P P P P P
*
Recreational Vehicle
Park C C
Restaurant P P P P
*
P
* P P
* P P P P
*
Retail Sales - Single
Tenant over 50,000 SF P P P
Retail Sales and Service P (c) P P P P* P* P* P* P P P P P
Retail Sales and Service - Alcohol C P P* P* P C P P
Sexually Oriented
Business
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
* P
* P* P
* P* P
* P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
* P
* P* P* P
*
P
*
P
*
P
* P* P
*
P
*
P
*
Shooting Range,
Indoor P P P P P
Theater P P P P P P P P
Retail Sales,
Manufactured Homes P P
*
Storage, Self Service P
*
P
* P P P P
* P
Vehicular Sales,
Rental, Repair, and
Service
P
*
P
* P P
*
Wholesales/Services P
*
P
* P P P P
INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING USES
Storage Tank/Cold
Storage Plant P P P
Micro-Industrial P
*
P
* P P
*
P
*
Industrial, Light P P P P P P
Industrial, Heavy P P
Recycling Facility -
Large P
* P P
Salvage Yard P
* P
*
Page 207 of 338
Scientific Testing/Research
Laboratory
P P P P P
Storage, Outdoor -
Equipment or
Materials
P P
* P P P
Truck Stop/Freight or
Trucking Terminal P P
Utility P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
* P* P
* P* P
* P* P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
*
P
* P* P* P
*
P
*
P
*
P
* P* P
*
P
*
P
*
Warehousing/Distrib
ution P C P P P
Waste Services P P
Wireless
Telecommunication
Facilities -
Intermediate
P
* P* P
* P
*
P
*
P
* P P
* P
*
P
*
P
*
P
* P* P
*
P
*
P
*
Wireless
Telecommunication Facilities - Major C P* C C C C P C C C P* C
Wireless Telecommunication Facilities -
Unregulated
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Notes:
(a) Multi-family residential uses located in stories or floors above retail commercial uses are permitted by right.
(b) Hotels are only allowed when accessory to a country club development and are limited to a maximum of fifteen (15) rooms.
(c) Permitted in live-work units only.
(d) Permitted only when there is also a HOO High Occupancy Overlay.
Page 208 of 338
October 5, 2023
Item No. 5.6.
City-Initiated Rezonings to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay (2 of 2)
Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development, Jeff Howell,
Matthew Ellis, Robin Macias, Jesse Dimeolo, Gabriel Schrum
Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,”
Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by
changing the zoning district boundaries as follows:
a.From GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 2.02 acres being Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lots 1-16 and 17R, generally
located along Lincoln Avenue;
b.From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately
4.12 acres being Timber Ridge Addition Phase 1, Block 2, Lots 13-24, Block 3, Lots 12-22,
generally located along University Oaks Boulevard;
c.From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately
6.71 acres being Parkway Plaza Phase 5, Block 1, Lots 1-15, Block 2, Lots 1-12, generally
located along Pine Ridge Drive;
d.From GS General Suburban or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy
Overlay for approximately 19.34 acres being Autumn Chase, Block 1, Lots 1-7, Brentwood
Section Two, Block 4, Lots 1-30, Block 5, Lots 1-23, Block 6, Lots 1-4, and Brentwood Section
Three Subdivision, generally located along Cornell Drive, Brentwood Drive, and Southwest
Parkway;
e.From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately
5.8 acres being Ashford Square Subdivision Replat, Volume 3202, Page 61, generally located
along Ashford Drive;
f.From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately
8.15 acres being Pecan Tree Estates Phase One Subdivision and Pecan Tree Estates Phase
Two Subdivision, save and except 0.687 acres labeled "Park," generally located along Oney
Hervey Drive;
g.From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay for approximately 28.4 acres being University Heights Phase 1
Subdivision, save and except Common Area 4, and University Heights Phase 2 and 3
Subdivision, generally bounded by Paloma Ridge Drive, Feather Run, Davidson Drive, and
Holleman Drive South;
h.From R Rural to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 8.8
acres being Las Palomas Subdivision, generally bounded by Abbate Road, Feather Run,
Kenyon Drive, and Holleman Drive South;
i.From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 12.85 acres being The Barracks II Phase 111 Subdivision, and The Barracks II
Phase 112, Block 38, Lots 1-24, Block 39, Lots 1-10, Common Area 13 and Parkland 12,
generally bounded by Towers Parkway, Goldilocks Lane, and Cain Road;
j.From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for
approximately 18.83 acres being Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 Subdivision, Volume 14370,
Page 209 of 338
Page 149, and Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 2A Subdivision, generally bounded by Deacon
Drive West, Towers Parkway, Oak Crest, and Holleman Drive South, and;
k. From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay for approximately 55.49 acres being The Barracks Phase 1 Subdivision,
The Barracks Phase 2 Subdivision, Williamsgate Phase 1 Subdivision, Buena Vida
Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 1 Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 2 Subdivision,
and 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Rock Prairie Road West,
Towers Parkway, Deacon Drive West, and General Parkway;
(Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 26, 2023 City Council Meeting – subject
to change.)
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
• Good Governance
• Neighborhood Integrity
• Diverse & Growing Economy
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval.
Summary: At the August 10 City Council meeting, City staff presented each of these areas along
with the feedback staff received during the public engagement process. At the meeting, the City
Council gave direction for staff to move forward with bringing these areas as official rezoning cases.
After considering the rezoning criteria, City staff has determined that each of these areas are
appropriate for rezoning to MH Middle Housing with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. The HOO
High Occupancy Overlay would allow the shared housing use as long as the property met the
requirements for that use.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Area E Supporting Materials
2. Area I Supporting Materials
3. Area M Supporting Materials
4. Area P-Q-R-S-T Supporting Materials
5. Area W Supporting Materials
6. Area Z Supporting Materials
7. Area HH and Area II Supporting Materials
8. Area JJ-KK, Area LL, and Area MM Supporting Materials
Page 210 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA E
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by duplexes to the north, single‐family homes to the west and
south and undeveloped property to the east. Development pressure continues to grow as new
generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station;
allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in
the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an
appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses
permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for
additional residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the
surrounding areas.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was
determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 211 of 338
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 212 of 338
Page 213 of 338
Page 214 of 338
Page 215 of 338
Page 216 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA I
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by single‐family homes to the north, west, and east, and multi‐
family developments to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations
of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and
encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The
MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale,
permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the
MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional
residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding
areas.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was
determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 217 of 338
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 218 of 338
Page 219 of 338
Page 220 of 338
Page 221 of 338
Page 222 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA M
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject properties are generally surrounded by multi‐family developments on all sides.
Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young professionals,
families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging redevelopment
opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning
district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the increase in
residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning
district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to meet market
demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was
determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 223 of 338
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 224 of 338
Page 225 of 338
Page 226 of 338
Page 227 of 338
Page 228 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA P‐Q‐R‐S‐T
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by single‐family homes and multi‐family apartments to the
north and more multi‐family to the west. Commercial developments are to the south and across
Southwest Parkway to the east. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of
students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and
encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The
MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale,
permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the
MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional
residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding
areas. Given the higher density multi‐family and commercial products, the increased density fits
well into this area.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was
determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
Page 229 of 338
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 230 of 338
Page 231 of 338
Page 232 of 338
Page 233 of 338
Page 234 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA W
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by office and commercial areas to the north, west and south.
Multi‐family apartments are to the northeast and a manufactured park is to the southeast.
Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young professionals,
families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging redevelopment
opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning
district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the increase in
residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning
district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to meet market
demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was
determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 235 of 338
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 236 of 338
Page 237 of 338
Page 238 of 338
Page 239 of 338
Page 240 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA Z
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by single‐family homes to the north and east, a multi‐family
development to the south, and a commercial development and single‐family homes to the west.
Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young professionals,
families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging redevelopment
opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning
district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the increase in
residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning
district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to meet market
demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was
determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 241 of 338
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 242 of 338
Page 243 of 338
Page 244 of 338
Page 245 of 338
Page 246 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA HH AND AREA II
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject properties are surrounded by single‐family homes, townhomes and commercial
development to the north, townhomes and vacant property to the east, townhomes, commercial
development and vacant property to the south and vacant property to the west. Development
pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young professionals, families, and
seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps
alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables
redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density
on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are
appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to meet market demand,
while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was
determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 247 of 338
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 248 of 338
Page 249 of 338
Page 250 of 338
Page 251 of 338
Page 252 of 338
Page 253 of 338
Page 254 of 338
Page 255 of 338
Page 256 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA JJ‐KK, AREA LL, AND AREA MM
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by townhomes to the north, east, and west and commercial
development to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of
students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and
encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The
MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale,
permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the
MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional
residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding
areas.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was
determined to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M
University and/or a Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of
the properties within the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 257 of 338
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning districts. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 258 of 338
Page 259 of 338
Page 260 of 338
Page 261 of 338
Page 262 of 338
Page 263 of 338
Page 264 of 338
Page 265 of 338
Page 266 of 338
Page 267 of 338
Page 268 of 338
Page 269 of 338
Page 270 of 338
October 5, 2023
Item No. 5.7.
City-Initiated Rezonings to MH Middle Housing
Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development, Jeff Howell,
Matthew Ellis, Robin Macias, Jesse Dimeolo, Gabriel Schrum
Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,”
Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by
changing the zoning district boundaries as follows:
a.From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 15.5
acres being The Dobrovolny Subdivision and Holleman Ridge Subdivision, generally bounded
by Anderson Street, Holleman Drive, and Charles Court;
b.From GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 9.73
acres being Lemon Tree Addition, Block 1, Lots 1-11, Block 2, Lot 1, Block 3, Lots 1-11, and
Parkway Plaza Phase 4, Block 3, Lots 1-14, Block 4, Lots 1-9, generally bounded by Anderson
Street, Cedar Run, and Lemon Tree Lane;
c.From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 7.03 acres being Brentwood Section
Five, Block 1, Lots 1-16 and Block 4, Lots 1-11, generally located along Colgate Circle and
Stanford Circle;
d.From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 6.85 acres being Eastmark
Phase II, Block E, Lots 1R-5R and Lots 16-40, generally located along Kalanchoe Court,
Camelia Court, and Azalea Court;
e.From T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing for approximately 7.4 acres being Krenek Crossing
Subdivision, Volume 6187, Page 138, generally located along Nelson Lane, Thornton Court,
and Camp Court;
f.From GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing for approximately 3.87 acres being Chalet
Village Subdivision, Volume 420, Page 91, generally located along Swiss Court and Chalet
Court;
g.From R Rural or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 43.6 acres being
Steeplechase Phase One Subdivision, Steeplechase Phase Two Subdivision, and
Steeplechase Phase Three Subdivision, generally bounded by Navarro Drive, FM 2154,
Balcones Drive, and Welsh Avenue;
h.From GS General Suburban, R-1B Single Family Residential, or D Duplex to MH Middle
Housing for approximately 38.1 acres being Steeplechase Phase Five Subdivision,
Steeplechase Phase Six Subdivision, Southwood Valley Section 23 Subdivision, Volume 525,
Page 647, and West Ridge, Block 5, Lots 1A-1B, 2A-2B, 3A-3B, 4A-4B, 5A-5B, 6A-6B, 7A-7B,
8A-8B, 9A-9B, 10A-10B, 11A-11B, 12A-12B, 13A-13B, 14A-14B, 15A-15B, 16A-16B, 17A-
17B, 18A-18B, 19A-19B, 20A-20B, 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B, 24A-24B, and 25A-25B,
generally bounded by Deacon Drive, FM 2154, Navarro Drive, and Welsh Avenue;
i.From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 14.6 acres being Southwood Valley
Section 22B, Block 47, Lots 1-14, Block 48, Lots 1-15 and 20-34, Block 49, Lots 14-29, and
Southwood Valley Section 22C, Block 45, Lots 21A-21B, 22A-22B, 23A-23B, 24A-24B, 25A-
25B, 26A-26B, 27A-27B, 28A-28B, Block 47, Lots 25A-25B, 26A-26B, 27A-27B, 28A-28B,
Page 271 of 338
29A-29B, 30A-30B, 31A-31B, and 32A-32B, generally bounded by Deacon Drive, Welsh
Avenue, Navarro Drive, and Pedernales Drive, and;
j. From D Duplex to MH Middle Housing for approximately 3.7 acres being Southwood Valley
Section 10A, Block 37, Lots 7-12, and Southwood Valley Section 2, Block 2, Lots 13-26,
generally bounded by Hawk Tree Drive, Rio Grande Boulevard, Airline Drive, and Southwood
Drive;
(Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 26, 2023 City Council Meeting – subject
to change.)
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
• Good Governance
• Neighborhood Integrity
• Diverse & Growing Economy
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval.
Summary: At the August 10 City Council meeting, City staff presented each of these areas along
with the feedback staff received during the public engagement process. At the meeting, the City
Council gave direction for staff to move forward with bringing these areas as official rezoning
cases. After considering the rezoning criteria, City staff has determined that each of these areas is
appropriate for rezoning to MH Middle Housing.
This item combines several City-initiated rezoning cases to MH Middle Housing, without having the
HOO High Occupancy Overlay district.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Area L and Area N Supporting Materials
2. Area U Supporting Materials
3. Area V Supporting Materials
4. Area X Supporting Materials
5. Area BB Supporting Materials
6. Area DD, Area EE, and Area FF Supporting Materials
7. Area GG Supporting Materials
Page 272 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA L AND AREA N
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by a park to the north, a multi‐family development to the east,
a park to the south, and townhomes to the west. Development pressure continues to grow as new
generations of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station;
allowing and encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in
the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an
appropriate scale, permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses
permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for
additional residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the
surrounding areas.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
Page 273 of 338
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable
given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 274 of 338
Page 275 of 338
Page 276 of 338
Page 277 of 338
Page 278 of 338
Page 279 of 338
Page 280 of 338
Page 281 of 338
Page 282 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA U
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by single‐family homes to the north and northeast across
Dartmouth Street. Duplexes are to the southwest and commercial areas to the east across
Southwest Parkway. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students,
young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging
redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting
the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle
Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density
to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
Page 283 of 338
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable
given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 284 of 338
Page 285 of 338
Page 286 of 338
Page 287 of 338
Page 288 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA V
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by multi‐family apartments to the north and east across
Southwest Parkway, and Wolf Pen Creek Park to the west. Single‐family homes are to the south
and southwest. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young
professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging
redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting
the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle
Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density
to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
Page 289 of 338
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable
given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 290 of 338
Page 291 of 338
Page 292 of 338
Page 293 of 338
Page 294 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA X
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by multi‐family apartments to the northwest and northeast, a
manufactured home park to the west and south, and City of College Station property to the east.
Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students, young professionals,
families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging redevelopment
opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle Housing zoning
district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the increase in
residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle Housing zoning
district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to meet market
demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure are adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
Page 295 of 338
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable
given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 296 of 338
Page 297 of 338
Page 298 of 338
Page 299 of 338
Page 300 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA BB
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject property is surrounded by townhomes to the north and west, single‐family homes to
the east, and duplexes to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations
of students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and
encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The
MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale,
permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the
MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional
residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding
areas.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
Page 301 of 338
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable
given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 302 of 338
Page 303 of 338
Page 304 of 338
Page 305 of 338
Page 306 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA DD, AREA EE, AND AREA FF
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject properties are surrounded by single‐family homes, duplexes, townhomes, and a
church to the north, single‐family homes and duplexes to the east, single‐family dwellings and
commercial development to the south and a commercial development, vacant property and
townhomes to the west. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of
students, young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and
encouraging redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The
MH Middle Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale,
permitting the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the
MH Middle Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional
residential density to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding
areas.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 307 of 338
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable
given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 308 of 338
Page 309 of 338
Page 310 of 338
Page 311 of 338
Page 312 of 338
Page 313 of 338
Page 314 of 338
Page 315 of 338
Page 316 of 338
Page 317 of 338
Page 318 of 338
Page 319 of 338
Page 320 of 338
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR AREA GG
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan
provides the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including,
townhomes, duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3‐12 unit), and limited small‐lot single
family. These areas are appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows
original character to evolve. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi‐
family residential or mixed‐use development and suburban residential or neighborhood
conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small
lots, small blocks, and well‐connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within Mixed Residential include: middle
housing, duplex, townhouse, and limited‐scale single‐family zoning.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The subject properties are surrounded by duplexes and a church to the north, duplexes and
townhomes to the east, single‐family dwellings to the south, and single‐family dwellings and a fire
station to the west. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students,
young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging
redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting
the increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle
Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density
to meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single‐family, townhouse, duplex,
and multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the
proposed zoning district. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site
Page 321 of 338
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Additionally, the 2021 Comprehensive Plan update anticipated the need for improved
transportation facilities, which are reflected on the Comprehensive Plan Functional Classification
and Context Class Map.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing provide for an increase in density that is marketable
given the location of the property.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Page 322 of 338
Page 323 of 338
Page 324 of 338
Page 325 of 338
Page 326 of 338
October 5, 2023
Item No. 5.8.
Rezoning - 701-703 Turner Street
Sponsor: Robin Macias
Reviewed By CBC: N/A
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, "Article 4, Zoning Districts,"
Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO
High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 0.23 acres generally located at 701-703 Turner Street.
Case #REZ2023-000016 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the October 26, 2023
City Council Meeting - Subject to change).
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
• Core Services & Infrastructure
• Neighborhood Integrity
• Diverse & Growing Economy
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 0.23 acres of land generally located at 701 – 703
Turner St from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay.
The subject property is currently developed. It is the applicant’s intent to establish a legal shared
housing use through the site plan process.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject properties are designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character
Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the
following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including townhomes,
duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3-12 unit), and limited small-lot single family. These areas are
appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows original character to evolve. These
areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi-family residential or mixed-use development
and suburban residential or neighborhood conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small lots,
small blocks, and well-connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. This rezoning request aligns
with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within this land use include: middle housing,
duplex, townhouse, and limited-scale single-family zoning.
Page 327 of 338
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
This analysis is provided with the understanding that the City-initiated rezoning of Area D to MH
Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay would be approved.
The subject property is surrounded by single-family homes to the north, east, and west, and duplex
properties to the south. Development pressure continues to grow as new generations of students,
young professionals, families, and seniors move to College Station; allowing and encouraging
redevelopment opportunities helps alleviate some of the pressure in the market. The MH Middle
Housing zoning district enables redevelopment of these lots at an appropriate scale, permitting the
increase in residential density on these sites. The residential uses permitted in the MH Middle
Housing zoning district are appropriate for this area, as it allows for additional residential density to
meet market demand, while still fitting into the context of the surrounding areas.
Additionally, the HOO High Occupancy Overlay, which allows shared housing uses, was determined
to be appropriate for the subject properties due to the proximity to Texas A&M University and/or a
Texas A&M Transportation Services bus route and the development pattern of the properties within
the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject properties are suitable for single-family, townhouse, duplex, and
multiplex uses, although some uses would require replatting of the lots to fit the dimensional
standards of the MH Middle Housing zoning district.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of this
development. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site development shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject
property fronts Turner Street, and each lot will take access off of it. The proposed use is expected to
generate less than 150 trips in any peak hour; therefore, a TIA was not required.
5. The marketability of the property:
The uses allowed by MH Middle Housing and the HOO High Occupancy Overlay provide for an
increase in density that is marketable given the location of the property.
Budget & Financial Summary:
Attachments:
1.Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2.Rezoning Exhibit
3.Background Information
4.Applicant's Supporting Information
5.Existing Future Land Use
6.Rezoning Map
Page 328 of 338
Page 329 of 337
Page 330 of 337
Page 331 of 337
CHAPPELSTREETTARROWSTCHURCHILL STREETUNIVERSITYDRIVEEASTTURNERSTPOPLARSTREETPASLER STREETASHSTREETNIMITZSTREETPEARCESTREETGILBERTSTREETNIMITZSTREETBANKSSTREETLIVEOAKSTREETASHSTREETPEYTONSTREET1EXISTINGPROPOSEDPROPOSED2023Ex. ARezoningMapT. 979.260.6963F. 979.260.35643204 Earl Rudder FWY SCollege Station, TX 77845Plan & Design Specialists in Civil ꞏ Engineering ꞏ HydraulicsHydrology ꞏ Utilities ꞏ StreetsSite Plans ꞏ Subdivisionswww.mitchellandmorgan.com§1 inch = 150 feet701, 703Turner StNIMITZSTREETUNIVERSITYDRIVEEASTCHAPPELSTREETCHURCHILLSTREETTURNERSTPASLERSTREETPOPLARSTREETASHSTREETPEARCESTREETNIMITZ STREETGILBERTSTREETNIMITZSTREETBANKSSTREETLIVEOAKSTREETASHSTREETPEYTONSTREET1ZoningDescriptionD - DuplexGC - General Commercial!GS - General SuburbanR-6 High Density Multi-Family!MH - Middle HousingThoroughfare PlanFunctionalFuture, 2 Lane Minor CollectorExisting, 6 Lane Major ArterialNOTE: This site does not lie within the100-year floodplain boundary perFEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map panel48041C0215F, Effective Date: April 2, 2014#Owner: SALAM INVESTMENTS LLCLegal Description: PASLER, BLOCK 2, LOT 27-29Acres: 0.23#Owner: SALAM INVESTMENTS LLCLegal Description: PASLER, BLOCK 2, LOT 27-29Acres: 0.23NumberOwner NameCurrent ZoningCurrent Land Use1 EATON OSCAR ESTATE General Suburban Mixed ResidentialSITEASH STNIMITZ STLIVE OAK STUNIVERSITY DRVICINITY MAPTURNER Page 332 of 337
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: October 5, 2023
Advertised Council Hearing Date: October 26, 2023
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
College Hills HOA
Property owner notices mailed: 35
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition:None at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts:None at the time of this report
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Mixed Residential GS General Suburban Gilbert Street (local street)
South Mixed Residential D Duplex Single-family residential
East Neighborhood
Conservation GS General Suburban Single-family residential
West Mixed Residential GS General Suburban Turner Street (local street)
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexed: April 1951
Zoning: unknown (upon annexation 1951)
C-2 Commercial Industrial (unknown)
R-1 Single Family Residential (2004)
GS General Suburban (renamed in 2013)
Final Plat:Pasler
Site Development:Single-family residential
Page 333 of 337
Name of Project:701-703 TURNER STREET REZONING (REZ2023-000016)
Address:701 TURNER ST
Legal Description:PASLER, BLOCK 2, LOT 27
Total Acreage:0.23
Applicant::
Property Owner:SALAM INVESTMENTS LLC
MITCHELL & MORGAN
List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change
necessary.
The City of College Station recently created a use for high occupancy residential structures that are permitted
under the MH Middle Housing zoning district with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. The residence at 701-703
Turner Street falls under this definition. We are requesting a rezoning to MH Middle Housing with the HOO High
Occupancy Overlay so that the properties and property owner may be in compliance with zoning and
development codes.
Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
explain why the Plan is incorrect.
The Comprehensive Plan indicates these properties are designated for Mixed Residential uses. Mixed
Residential is intended for a mix of medium density uses. There is a variety of housing densities in in this area of
the city that the existing shared housing residence contributes toward, which is in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby
property and with the character of the neighborhood?
D Duplex is suitable for the property; however, the property is developed as a single-residence structure that is
classified as Shared Housing. MH Middle Housing with a High Occupancy Overlay is the most suitable zoning
district for the property and existing development.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
Middle Housing with a High Occupancy Overlay uses contribute to the desired mix of densities and housing
types specified in the Mixed Residential land use designation making this development very suitable for the
property. Shared housing residences are especially suitable due to the proximity to Texas A&M University.
REZONING APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Page 1 of 2
Page 334 of 337
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
Middle Housing with a High Occupancy Overlay uses contribute to the desired mix of densities and housing
types specified in the Mixed Residential land use designation making this development very suitable for the
property. Shared housing residences are especially suitable due to the proximity to Texas A&M University.
Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
D Duplex are marketable for the properties. However, the residential unit on the properties are now considered
Shared Housing units, which are more appropriate under the MH Middle Housing zoning district with the HOO
High Occupancy Overlay.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
N/A
Page 2 of 2
Page 335 of 337
Page 336 of 337
Page 337 of 337