The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09/07/2023 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission College Station, TX Meeting Agenda Planning and Zoning Commission 1101 Texas Ave, College Station, TX 77840 Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting Meeting ID: 257 325 334 510 | Passcode: iAGMTc Phone: 833-240-7855 | Phone Conference: 771 141 369# The City Council may or may not attend this meeting. September 7, 2023 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers College Station, TX Page 1 Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a third- party vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting access and participation will be in-person only. 1. Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. 2. Hear Visitors At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The visitor presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) 3. Consent Agenda All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. Attachments: 1. August 17 2023 3.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Midtown Reserve Subdivision Phases 109 and 112 on approximately 19.5 acres, located generally on the south side of Rock Prairie Road, across from Harris Drive. Case #FP2022-000010 Sponsors: Jesse Dimeolo Attachments: 1. Staff Report 2. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Maps 3. Final Plat 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. Page 1 of 128 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 September 7, 2023 5. Regular Agenda 5.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding waivers to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.3.G.2 'Blocks' and Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.3.J 'Access Ways', and presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a final plat for Woodway West Phase 1 Subdivision Lot 1R, Block 2 being a replat of Woodway West Phase 1 Subdivision Lot 1, Block 2 on approximately 28.949 acres, generally surrounded by Holleman Drive West, Marion Pugh Drive, Luther Street West and Jones Butler Road. Case #FP2023-000009 Sponsors: Robin Macias Attachments: 1. Staff Report 2. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3. Final Plat 4. Subdivision Waiver Request 5. Applicant's Supporting Information 5.2. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay on approximately 48.31 acres of land, being 103 lots within Southwood Sections 1; 2; 2A; 6; 7; 9; and 10 Subdivisions and Camelot Addition Section 2 Subdivision, generally located between Southwest Parkway and Guadalupe Drive. Case #REZ2023-000061 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 14, 2023 City Council meeting – Subject to change). Sponsors: Gabriel Schrum Attachments: 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Rezoning Map 3. Background Information 4. Future Land Use Map 5. Original Subdivision Plats 6. Applicant's Supporting Information 7. Petition Committee Members 8. Neighborhood Meeting Materials 9. Petition Signatures 5.3. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from D Duplex to MF Multi-Family for approximately 0.35 acres located at Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lot 22, generally located at 710 Vassar Court. Case #REZ2023-000063 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 14, 2023 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Sponsors: Jesse Dimeolo Attachments: 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Background Information 4. Applicant's Supporting Information 5. Rezoning Map 6. Future Land Use Map Page 2 of 128 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 September 7, 2023 5.4. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from M-1 Light Industrial to SC Suburban Commercial for approximately 0.9663 acres located at 1601 Sebesta Road, generally located on the north side of Sebesta Road across from Foxfire Drive. Case #REZ2023-000065 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 28, 2023 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Sponsors: Anthony Armstrong Attachments: 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Future Land Use Map 3. Rezoning Map 4. Rezoning Exhibit 5. Background Information 6. Applicant's Supporting Information 5.5. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 5.2 “Residential Zoning District Dimensional Standards,” Article 7.3 “Off-Street Parking Standards,” and Article 7.4 “Access Management and Circulation,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, regarding parking and access standards for developments in the MH Middle Housing zoning district. Case #ORDA2023-000005. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 14, 2023 City Council Meeting – subject to change.) Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski Attachments: 1. Sec. 5.2. Residential Zoning District Dimensional Standards redlines 2. Sec. 7.3. Off-Street Parking Standards redlines 3. Sec. 7.4. Access Management and Circulation redlines 5.6. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Section 1.10 “Transitional Provisions,” Section 4.1 “Establishment of Districts,” Section 5.10 “Overlay Districts,” and Section 6.3 “Types of Use” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, for the creation of the HOO High Occupancy Overlay. Case #ORDA2023-000004. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 14, 2023 City Council Meeting – subject to change.) Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski Attachments: 1. Section 1.10 Transitional Provisions redlines 2. Section 4.1 Establishment of Districts redlines 3. Section 5.10 Overlay Districts redlines 4. Section 6.3 Types of Use redlines 5.7. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the PDS Plan of Work. Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski Attachments: 1. PDS Plan of Work FY2023 2. Draft PDS Plan of Work FY2024 6. Informational Agenda 6.1. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev 6.2. Presentation and discussion on MH Middle Housing rezoning requests. Sponsors: Michael Ostrowski Page 3 of 128 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 September 7, 2023 Attachments: None 6.3. Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: • A rezoning of approximately 0.4 of an acre of land located at 217 Richards Street from GC General Commercial to GS General Suburban. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 3, 2023 and voted (5-1) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 24, 2023 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. • A rezoning of approximately 33 acres of land located at 5900 Rock Prairie Road from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 17, 2023 and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 24, 2023 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. • A rezoning of approximately 0.09 of an acre of land located at 213 Holleman Drive East from GC General Commercial to WPC Wolf Pen Creek. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 17, 2023 and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 24, 2023 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. • A conditional use permit for ground-floor multi-family on approximately 1 acre of land located at 213 Holleman Drive East. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 17, 2023 and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 24, 2023 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. 6.4. Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, September 14, 2023 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, September 21, 2023 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, September 28, 2023 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 5, 2023 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 19, 2023 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ for discussion 6.5. Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board. • None 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 8. Adjourn. The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on September 1, 2023 at 5:00 p.m. Page 4 of 128 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 September 7, 2023 City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 5 of 128 August 17, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 8 Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting August 17, 2023 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Acting Chairperson Jason Cornelius, Commissioners Bobby Mirza, Melissa McIlhaney, Marcus Chaloupka, and Aron Collins COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Chairperson Dennis Christiansen and Commissioner David White COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmember Dennis Maloney CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Planning & Development Services Michael Ostrowski, Assistant Director of Planning & Development Services Molly Hitchcock, Transportation Planning Coordinator Jason Schubert, Long Range Planning Administrator Alyssa Halle- Schramm, Land Development Review Administrator Anthony Armstrong, Staff Planners Robin Macias, Jesse DiMeolo, Gabriel Schrum, Aspen Pflanz, and Carl Ahrens, Engineer I Lucas Harper, Graduate Engineer II Katherine Beaman-Jamael, Graduate Engineer I Lindsey Pressler, Deputy City Attorney Leslie Tipton-Whitten, Assistant City Attorney II Aaron Longoria, Administrative Support Specialist Kristen Hejny, Staff Assistant II Tiffany Romero, and Technology Services Specialist Trey Bransom 1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. Acting Chairperson Cornelius called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Hear Visitors No visitors spoke. 3. Consent Agenda 3.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. • August 3, 2023 3.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Southern Pointe Subdivision Section 403 on approximately 18.52 acres, located generally at the intersection of State Highway 6 and Southern Pointe Parkway. Case #FPCO2022-000008 Commissioner Chaloupka motioned to approve the Consent Agenda, Commissioner Mirza seconded the motion, the motion passed 5-0. 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. Page 6 of 128 August 17, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 8 No items were removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. 5. Regular Agenda Agenda Items #5.1 & #5.5 were removed from the agenda. 5.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay on approximately 48.31 acres of land, being 103 lots within Southwood Sections 1; 2; 2A; 6; 7; 9; and 10 Subdivisions and Camelot Addition Section 2 Subdivision, generally located between Southwest Parkway and Guadalupe Drive. Case #REZ2023-000061 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 14, 2023 City Council meeting – Subject to change). 5.2 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A , Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GC General Commercial to WPC Wolf Pen Creek for approximately 0.092 Acres at 213 Holleman Drive East, generally located at the intersection of Holleman Drive East and George Bush Drive East. Case #REZ2023-000008 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the August 24, 2023 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). 5.3 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action to consider a Conditional Use Permit for ground floor multi-family in the WPC Wolf Pen Creek zoning district on approximately 1.02 acres located at 213-219 Holleman Drive East, generally located at the intersection of George Bush Drive East and Holleman Drive East. Case #CUP2023-000001 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the August 24, 2023 City Council Meeting - Subject to change.) Presentations and public hearings for agenda items #5.2 and #5.3 were held together. Staff Planner Schrum presented agenda items #5.2 and #5.3 to the Commission recommending approval of #5.2 and recommending approval of #5.3 with the conditions that no public access shall be allowed onto George Bush Drive East, but rather the installation of Grasscrete, and a gate with Knox Box for Fire access, the buildings shall have a reduced building setback on Holleman Drive East, with pedestrian access from the units to existing sidewalks to be in-line with the intended urban form of the zoning district, and the development shall conform to the attached site and landscape plans. Commissioner Collins asked if the rezoning and conditional use permit have been reviewed by the fire, sanitation, and utility departments with no objections. Page 7 of 128 August 17, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 Staff Planner Schrum confirmed that all departments have reviewed and approved the rezoning and conditional use permit. Acting Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing for items #5.2 and #5.3. No visitors spoke. Acting Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing. Commissioner Collins motioned to recommend approval of the rezoning, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion, the motion passed 5-0. Commissioner Collins motioned to recommend approval of the conditional use permit with the conditions recommended by staff, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion, the motion passed 5-0. 5.4 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from BPI Business Park Industrial to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 7.37 acres of land being Tract 38.4 of the Crawford Burnett Subdivision, generally located at 2900 North Graham Road. Case #REZ2023-000009 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 14, 2023 City Council Meeting - Subject to change). Staff Planner Macias presented the rezoning to the Commission recommending approval. Commissioner Collins asked for the intended use of the property. Rocky Kau, Applicant, confirmed that the development will be developed as an office complex in the front and a storage facility warehouse in the back with a 22-foot eave height. Acting Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing. No visitors spoke. Acting Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing. Commissioner McIlhaney motioned to recommend approval of the rezoning, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion. Commissioner Chaloupka asked if staff is recommending moving forward with changes to the buffer zones that meet the standards in the area. Page 8 of 128 August 17, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 8 Staff Planner Macias stated that the Unified Development Ordinance does allow for developers to substitute a masonry wall for a wooden fence if they double the area, and if double the plantings are provided. Ms. Macias further clarified that BPI Business Park Industrial zoning districts currently require double the plantings so the applicant would be required to provide quadruple the plantings, however the applicant is asking to only be required to provide double the plantings. Staff is supportive of this because the applicant is removing some of the more intense uses. Commissioner Chaloupka asked about the detention pond as a buffer zone and if the pond is controlled or open. Staff Planner Macias stated that the applicant has not submitted a site plan application to provide a detention pond design. Crissy Hartl, Applicant, Mitchell & Morgan Engineers, clarified that they have not designed the detention pond yet, but the plantings would be incorporated into the detention pond area. Ms. Hartl also stated that asking for a fence rather than a masonry wall would disrupt less natural vegetation. Commissioner Collins asked if staff received any comments from the surrounding property owners. Director Ostrowski clarified that staff did receive an email from an adjacent property owner directing staff to see the attached letter in support, there was no letter attached. However, the subject of the email was “Letter for support of rezoning for 2900 N Graham Road”. The motion passed 5-0. 5.5 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from D Duplex to MF Multi- Family for approximately 0.35 acres located at Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lot 22, generally located at 710 Vassar Court. Case #REZ2023-000063 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 14, 2023 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). 5.6 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned to Development District to amend the concept plan on approximately 33 acres located at 5900 Rock Prairie Road. Case #REZ2023-000062 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the August 24, 2023 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Page 9 of 128 August 17, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 8 Staff Planner DiMeolo presented the rezoning to the Commission recommending approval with the conditions that a public access easement for a pedestrian path and landscaping, meeting City specifications, located on the adjacent Rock Prairie Baptist Church property (5000 Rock Prairie Road) is approved by the City and recorded with Brazos County and that the pedestrian path and landscaping is constructed and maintained by the Rock Prairie Municipal Management District Number 2. Commissioner McIlhaney asked for clarification on the Commission requiring a condition that has already been met. Staff Planner DiMeolo clarified that for the applicant to develop the property, the concept plan for the subdivision needs to be updated to reflect the changes and to be approved by the Commission and City Council. Director Ostrowski clarified that the changes must be formalized within the PDD Planned Development District concept plan because the trail is outside of the PDD Planned Development District boundary. Joe Schultz, Applicant, Schultz Engineering, was available to answer questions from the Commission. Acting Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing. No visitors spoke. Acting Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chaloupka motioned to recommend approval of the concept plan amendment with the conditions recommended by staff, Commissioner McIlhaney seconded the motion, the motion passed 5-0. 5.7 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the PDS Plan of Work. Director Ostrowski presented updates on the PDS Plan of Work to the Commission. Commissioner Collins asked for further clarification on the safe passing ordinance amendment and tactical urbanism. Director Ostrowski clarified that the safe passing ordinance would set standards for the passing of bicyclists and pedestrians, and that tactical urbanism was a program to allow small scale temporary improvements that could lead to more permanent ones. Commissioner Chaloupka asked if there were a way to consolidate bicycle related topics. Page 10 of 128 August 17, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 8 Director Ostrowski stated that the City has a Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board that acts as an advisory committee proposing change recommendations to the Commission, however many of the items are action items from various related plans. Commissioner McIlhaney asked for an update on the accessory dwelling unit changes. Director Ostrowski stated that the City is discussing setting additional standards, and whether or not attached accessory dwelling units should count as an accessory dwelling unit. Commissioner Mirza asked for additional information on the how the City will address traffic congestion and mobility concerns as the population of College Station increases. Director Ostrowski confirmed that the population is growing at about two to three percent a year. Mr. Ostrowski stated that staff is looking at a number of items within Fiscal Year 2023 and Fiscal Year 2024, such as complete streets for the core of College Station, identifying roadways that are prime candidates for creating pathways for bicycle and pedestrian accommodations, and different congestion analysis modeling efforts. Acting Chairperson Cornelius stated that 20 action items from the PDS Plan of Work are being carried over, asking if staff considers this to be an aggressive number of items. Director Ostrowski clarified that this is a good amount of set projects for the year, not all will be complete in one year. Commissioner Collins asked if the City had any plans to ensure suitable housing accommodations for new students. Director Ostrowski stated that with limited additional on-campus student housing there will be incremental changes, such as the MH Middle Housing zoning district and identifying appropriate areas for growth. 6. Informational Agenda 6.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. 6.2 Discussion of Minor / Amending Plats approved by staff: • Wolf Den Subdivision, Block 1, Lots 1R-4R ~ Case #FP2023-000016 There was no discussion. Page 11 of 128 August 17, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8 6.3 Presentation and discussion on MH Middle Housing rezoning requests. Director Ostrowski provided updates on the MH Middle Housing zoning district and Shared Housing site plan applications. 6.4 Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: • An ordinance amendment regarding formatting and content edits to the Unified Development Ordinance. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 20, 2023 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 10, 2023 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. • An ordinance amendment regarding off-street parking and bicycle parking requirements. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 20, 2023 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 10, 2023 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. There was no discussion. 6.5 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, August 24, 2023 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, September 7, 2023 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, September 14, 2023 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, September 21, 2023 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. There was no discussion. 6.6 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board. • None There was no discussion. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion. 8. Adjourn Page 12 of 128 August 17, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 8 The meeting adjourned at 7:02 p.m. Approved: Attest: ___________________________________ _________________________________ Jason Cornelius, Acting Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Board Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services Page 13 of 128 Planning & Zoning Commission September 7, 2023 Supporting Materials 1.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2.Final Plat Scale 44 lots on approximately 19.5 acres. Location Generally located on the south side of Rock Prairie Road, across from Harris Drive. Property Owner College Station Downtown Residential, LLC Applicant Schultz Engineering, LLC Project Manager Jesse DiMeolo, Staff Planner, jdimeolo@cstx.gov Project Overview In June 2020, the subject property was rezoned from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District. These are the first two phases of a new single-family residential expansion to the Midtown Reserve Subdivision and plats the property into 44 single-family lots, five common areas, and 4.1 acres of right-of-way. Sidewalk fee-in-lieu was also paid for a portion of property frontage along Rock Prairie Road. Preliminary Plan Originally approved November 2018 with revisions July 2019 and December 2021. Waivers were granted to the subdivision regulations for block length along Rock Prairie Road from Town Lake Drive to the future Double Mountain Road thoroughfare extension and along the shared property line to the east of Phase 109, Block 37 from Calaveras Court to the Toledo Bend Drive stub. Public Infrastructure Approximate Totals: Water Lines ~ 2543 LF Sanitary Sewer Lines ~ 4990 LF Storm Sewers ~ 1972 LF Bike Paths ~ 1173 LF Sidewalks ~ 6485 LF Streets ~ 3609 LF Parkland Dedication This Final Plat does not include any parkland dedication. The developer dedicated land and constructed park improvements in an earlier phase and these credits now cover the requirements for these two phases. Traffic Impact Analysis TIA for the overall development was provided with the preliminary plan approved in November 2018 and updated in May 2020. This plat is in conformance with the TIA. Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes, with the exception of waivers related to Block Length requirements previously approved with the preliminary plan. Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Final Plat for Midtown Reserve Subdivision Phases 109 & 112 FP2022-000010 Page 14 of 128 Page 15 of 128 Page 16 of 128 Page 17 of 128 242625 3938373635 TOLEDO BEND DRIVE EME R G E N C Y A C C E SS ROA D ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD BLOCK 9 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 5 20 2221 23 2221 464443 23 50 5 12 4 11 3 10 2 9 8 7 6 COMMON AR E A 1 2 & P . A . E . 48 49 42 43 44 45 46 47 41 1 45 COMMON AREA 13 & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 40 BLOCK 6 BLOCK 6 TOLEDO BEND DRIVEMINERAL WELLS LANE KICKAPOO LANE25 28 27 26 4 37 37 36 36 DOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD PUBLIC ALLEY TEXANA DRIVECALAVERAS COURTCALAVERAS COURTCALAVERAS COURT ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD FUTURE FORK COURTFUTURE COFFEE MILL LANECOMMON AREA 20 AND PrDE 6.51 AC. 6 8 5 9 COMMON AREA 32 PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT 0.18 AC. 5 COMMON AREA 22 0.27 AC. 9 4 11 7 3 6 10 1 COMMON AREA 31 0.07 AC. 1 2 65576456635562546153 6960 52 67596658 68 COMMON AREA 16 0.07 AC. 4 PHASE 109 PHASE 112 51 DOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROA D 3 7 10 11 12 13 14 2 8 TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER:SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 KERR JOB 22-240 SCALE 1'' = ' JUNE 2023 OWNER/DEVELOPER: College Station Downtown Residential LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 690-7250 FINAL PLAT MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION PHASES 109 & 112 109 - 16.896 ACRES & 112 - 2.617 ACRES BEING PORTIONS OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 111.679 ACRE TRACT VOLUME 14405, PAGE 186 OPRBCT AND A CALLED 33.342 ACRE TRACT VOLUME 16558, PAGE 80 OPRBCT THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE SURVEY, A-9 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS PHASE 109 - 25 LOTS BLOCK 37, LOTS 1-14 BLOCK 36, LOTS 1-11 COMMON AREAS 20, 22, 31, & 32 PHASE 112 - 19 LOTS BLOCK 4, LOTS 51-69 COMMON AREA 16 SHEET OF 4 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALENOT TO SCALE ROCK PRAIRIE RD BIRD P ON D R D MEDICAL AVETOWN LAKE DRIVEDOUBLE MOUNTAIN R D MI D T OW N D R LEGEND # 1 80 P:\21-980 Midtown Reserve 109 & 112 - Documents\FINAL PLAT\Midtown Reserve 109 & 112.dwg, SHEET 1Page 18 of 128 39 EME R GE N C Y A C C E SS R O A D ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD BLOCK 4 50 48 49 42 43 44 45 46 47 41 COMMON AREA 13 & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 40 TOLEDO BEND DRIVE4 DOUBLE MOUNTAIN ROAD PUBLIC ALLEY FUTURE FORK COURTFUTURE COFFEE MILLLANEMATCHLINECOMMON AREA 20 AND PrDE 6.52 AC. 65 57 64 56 63 55 62 54 61 53 69 60 52 67 59 66 58 68 COMMON AREA 16 0.07 AC. PHASE 112 51 PHASE 109 TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER:SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 KERR JOB 22-240 SCALE 1'' = ' JUNE 2023 OWNER/DEVELOPER: College Station Downtown Residential LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 690-7250 FINAL PLAT MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION PHASES 109 & 112 109 - 16.896 ACRES & 112 - 2.617 ACRES BEING PORTIONS OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 111.679 ACRE TRACT VOLUME 14405, PAGE 186 OPRBCT AND A CALLED 33.342 ACRE TRACT VOLUME 16558, PAGE 80 OPRBCT THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE SURVEY, A-9 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS PHASE 109 - 25 LOTS BLOCK 37, LOTS 1-14 BLOCK 36, LOTS 1-11 COMMON AREAS 20, 22, 31, & 32 PHASE 112 - 19 LOTS BLOCK 4, LOTS 51-69 COMMON AREA 16 SHEET OF 42 40 LEGEND #P:\21-980 Midtown Reserve 109 & 112 - Documents\FINAL PLAT\Midtown Reserve 109 & 112.dwg, SHEET 2Page 19 of 128 37 37 36 36 TEXANA DRIVE CALA V E R A S C O U R T CA L A V E R A S C O U R T CALAVERAS COURTROCK PRAIRIE ROADMATCHLINE COMMON AREA 20 AND PrDE 6.51 AC. 6 8 5 9 COMMON AREA 32 PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT 0.18 AC. 5 9 4 11 7 3 6 10 1 COMMON AREA 31 0.07 AC. 1 2 4 DOUBLE MOUNTA IN ROAD PHASE 109 COMMON AREA 220.27 AC.COMMON AREA 32PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT0.18 AC.3 7 10 11 12 13 14 2 8 PHASE 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 BLOCK 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 LOT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 AREA (SF) 16,486 11,034 9,200 10,231 13,042 9,640 9,600 9,533 17,373 11,759 9,191 8,807 9,952 9,731 10,171 14,819 8,901 9,200 9,200 9,192 10,140 11,884 PHASE 109 109 109 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 BLOCK 37 37 37 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 LOT 12 13 14 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 AREA (SF) 11,931 11,000 11,831 7,143 5,131 4,823 4,600 4,461 4,404 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,399 4,341 6,167 TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER:SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 KERR JOB 22-240 SCALE 1'' = ' JUNE 2023 OWNER/DEVELOPER: College Station Downtown Residential LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 690-7250 FINAL PLAT MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION PHASES 109 & 112 109 - 16.896 ACRES & 112 - 2.617 ACRES BEING PORTIONS OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 111.679 ACRE TRACT VOLUME 14405, PAGE 186 OPRBCT AND A CALLED 33.342 ACRE TRACT VOLUME 16558, PAGE 80 OPRBCT THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE SURVEY, A-9 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS PHASE 109 - 25 LOTS BLOCK 37, LOTS 1-14 BLOCK 36, LOTS 1-11 COMMON AREAS 20, 22, 31, & 32 PHASE 112 - 19 LOTS BLOCK 4, LOTS 51-69 COMMON AREA 16 SHEET OF 43 40 LEGEND #P:\21-980 Midtown Reserve 109 & 112 - Documents\FINAL PLAT\Midtown Reserve 109 & 112.dwg, SHEET 3Page 20 of 128 TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER:SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 KERR JOB 22-240 SCALE 1'' = ' JUNE 2023 OWNER/DEVELOPER: College Station Downtown Residential LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 690-7250 FINAL PLAT MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION PHASES 109 & 112 109 - 16.896 ACRES & 112 - 2.617 ACRES BEING PORTIONS OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 111.679 ACRE TRACT VOLUME 14405, PAGE 186 OPRBCT AND A CALLED 33.342 ACRE TRACT VOLUME 16558, PAGE 80 OPRBCT THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE SURVEY, A-9 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS PHASE 109 - 25 LOTS BLOCK 37, LOTS 1-14 BLOCK 36, LOTS 1-11 COMMON AREAS 20, 22, 31, & 32 PHASE 112 - 19 LOTS BLOCK 4, LOTS 51-69 COMMON AREA 16 SHEET OF 44 40 “” ” ” “” ” “” ” “” ” “” ” “” “” ” ” ” “” “” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” “” ” ” ” ””P:\21-980 Midtown Reserve 109 & 112 - Documents\FINAL PLAT\Midtown Reserve 109 & 112.dwg, SHEET 4Page 21 of 128 Planning & Zoning Commission September 7, 2023 Scale 28.949 acres for multi-family development Location The block bound by Holleman Dr W, Marion Pugh Dr, Luther St W and Jones Butler Rd Property Owner Tailwind College Station Holdings LLC Applicant Windrose Land Surveying Project Manager Robin Macias, Staff Planner rmacias@cstx.gov Project Overview This is a replat of a lot due to the recent abandonment of Sienna Drive. There is currently an existing multi-family development on the lot. Preliminary Plan N/A Public Infrastructure Approximate Totals (linear feet): Sidewalks – 890 Parkland Dedication N/A Traffic Impact Analysis Since no additional residential lots were created with this plat, no further traffic mitigation was required. Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes with the exception of the requested three waivers to UDO Section 8.3.G.2 ‘Blocks’ and three waivers to UDO Section 8.3.J ‘Access Ways’ along Jones Butler Rd, Luther St and Marion Pugh Dr. Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2.Final Plat 3.Subdivision Waiver Request 4.Applicant’s Supporting Information Final Plat of Woodway West – Phase I Subdivision Lot 1R, Block 2 Being A Replat of Woodway West – Phase I Subdivision Lot 1, Block 2 (FP2023-000009) Page 22 of 128 Page 23 of 128 Page 24 of 128 Page 25 of 128 NORTH LOCATION MAP 9360 CORPORATE DR., SUITE 102 I SELMA, TX 78154 I 210.634.1565 FIRM REGISTRATION NO. 10108800 I WINDROSESERVICES.COM ILAND SURVEYING PLATTING W I N D R O S E SITE FINAL PLAT OF THE WOODWAY WEST - PHASE I SUBDIVISION LOT 1R, BLOCK 2 BEING A REPLAT OF WOODWAY WEST - PHASE I SUBDIVISION LOT 1, BLOCK 2 (VOL. 705, PG. 619, O.R.B.C.T.) 0'100'200'50' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 100' NORTH Page 26 of 128 0'100'200'50' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 100' “” “” “” “” 9360 CORPORATE DR., SUITE 102 I SELMA, TX 78154 I 210.634.1565 FIRM REGISTRATION NO. 10108800 I WINDROSESERVICES.COM ILAND SURVEYING PLATTING W I N D R O S E NORTH LOCATION MAP SITE DETAIL 'A' NORTH NORTH FINAL PLAT OF THE WOODWAY WEST - PHASE I SUBDIVISION LOT 1R, BLOCK 2 BEING A REPLAT OF WOODWAY WEST - PHASE I SUBDIVISION LOT 1, BLOCK 2 (VOL. 705, PG. 619, O.R.B.C.T.) Page 27 of 128 SUBDIVISION WAVIER REQUESTS The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the UDO except for the following waiver requests: UDO Section 8.3.G.2 ‘Blocks’ (Block Length for General Urban) – Per the requirements of this section, block length shall be a maximum of 900 ft for areas designated as General Urban on the Thoroughfare Plan Functional Classification and Context Class Map. The applicant is requesting this waiver along Jones Butler Road, Luther Street W and Marion Pugh Drive. The block length along Marion Pugh Drive is approximately 1,278 feet, which exceeds the maximum block length by 378 feet. The block length along Luther Street W is approximately 1,363 feet, which exceeds the maximum block length by 463 feet. The block length along Jones Butler Road is approximately 1,134 feet, which exceeds the maximum block length by 234 feet. The applicant is requesting these waivers as their intention through the replat is to increase the lot’s buildable area by incorporating the recently abandoned Sienna Dr right-of-way UDO Section 8.3.J. ‘Access Ways’ – Per the requirements of this section, in blockfaces over 900 feet in length, an access way shall extend across the width of the block near the center of the block. The applicant is requesting this waiver along Jones Butler Road, Luther Street W and Marion Pugh Drive. The applicant has stated that providing the access way is not possible without affecting the existing apartment units, associated parking, fire lanes and amenities. In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver: 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The property has frontage along Holleman Dr W, Marion Pugh Dr, Luther Dr W and Jones Butler Rd. There is an existing multi-family development on the property making it impossible to break block and provide access ways without affecting the existing units, parking, and amenities. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waiver is not granted, the subject tract cannot be replatted. The waivers provide the applicant with the ability to provide more housing units without disrupting the existing structures. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and The granting of the waiver for this development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property. Page 28 of 128 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Granting the requested waiver will not affect the ability of surrounding tracts to meet the ordinance when platting. The surrounding properties are currently developed. Page 29 of 128 Page 30 of 128 Page 31 of 128 Page 32 of 128 Page 33 of 128 Page 34 of 128 Page 35 of 128 Page 36 of 128 Page 37 of 128 Page 38 of 128 Page 39 of 128 Page 40 of 128 Page 41 of 128 September 7, 2023 Item No. 5.2. Greater Southwood Valley ROO - Restricted Occupancy Overlay Sponsor: Gabriel Schrum Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay on approximately 48.31 acres of land, being 103 lots within Southwood Sections 1; 2; 2A; 6; 7; 9; and 10 Subdivisions and Camelot Addition Section 2 Subdivision, generally located between Southwest Parkway and Guadalupe Drive. Case #REZ2023- 000061 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 14, 2023 City Council meeting – Subject to change). Relationship to Strategic Goals: Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): N/A Summary: Summary: This request is to rezone a total of approximately 48.31 acres from GS General Suburban to GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay, being approximately: • 11.26 acres being 20 lots within Southwood Section 1 • 9.98 acres being 13 lots within Southwood Section 2 • 2.96 acres being 4 lots within Southwood Section 2A • 10.16 acres being 38 lots within Southwood Section 6, 7 & 9 • 3.76 acres being 8 lots within Southwood Section 10; and • 10.19 acres being 20 lots within Camelot Addition Section 2 This request is to add the ROO, which is a single-family overlay zoning district, to the existing base zoning within these contiguous subdivision boundaries. The ROO is intended to provide subdivision- specific occupancy regulations – not to exceed two unrelated persons per single-family dwelling or accessory living quarter. The Greater Southwood Petition Committee, comprised of property owners from each original subdivision, has met all requirements of the ROO application process. The Petition Committee submitted the application materials including the ROO petition for each subdivision. When submitting an application with contiguous subdivisions applying jointly within one application, the fifty (50) percent plus one (1) petition signature threshold of property owners in support of the overlay must be met for each of the original subdivisions that apply jointly. City staff were able to verify that each original subdivision has met the petition signature threshold in support of the requested ROO. Southwood Section 6, 7 & 9 is unique in that it has three section numbers but was platted in 1970 as one subdivision plat and therefore counts as one original subdivision. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: Page 42 of 128 The subject areas are designated as Neighborhood Conservation and Natural & Open Areas on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map. The Natural & Open Areas are tributaries that lead to Bee Creek and the associated floodplain. The surrounding areas to the north are designated as Neighborhood Conservation and the properties to the east are also designated as Neighborhood Conservation with Natural & Open Areas (the Bee Creek tributaries). The subject lots are surrounded by Neighborhood Conservation to the south and Neighborhood Conservation and Institutional/Public to the west at the location of A&M Consolidated High School. These subject areas are bounded by Southwest Parkway to the north, which is an existing 4-lane minor arterial and is shown on the Comprehensive Plan’s Thoroughfare Plan. The Comprehensive Plan discusses single-family overlay zoning districts in both Chapter 3, Strong Neighborhoods and Chapter 9, Collaborative Partnerships. The plan states that, “various single- family overlay zoning districts have been created to help mitigate the issues associated with tear- downs in established neighborhoods. These include the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay, the Restricted Occupancy Overlay, and the Historic Preservation Overlay.” The plan goes on to state that collaboration between the City and Texas A&M University is vital to proactively address issues caused by the rapid growth of the university and the stressors and potential changes that places on nearby neighborhoods. Single-family overlay zoning is a tool that a neighborhood can choose for itself to help address and mitigate perceived, anticipated, and actual changes within an established single-family neighborhood. While the NCO Neighborhood Conservation and HP Historic Preservation overlays address and mitigate changes to physical property characteristics, the intent of a ROO is to address and mitigate issues associated with over-occupancy. As a tool that a neighborhood can pursue for itself to address issues of over-occupancy and preserve neighborhood character, the request is aligned with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The subject areas are surrounded by GS General Suburban zoned single-family homes, except to the north across Southwest Pkwy. which is zoned D-Duplex and is currently developed with duplex housing. The single-family uses allowed by the GS General Suburban zoning district will remain and the addition of the ROO solely restricts the number of unrelated persons per single-family dwelling or accessory living quarters to no more than two unrelated persons. As stated in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO): Single-family overlay districts create an additional zoning district that is superimposed over the underlying zoning district. Single-family overlay districts are intended to provide additional standards for College Station neighborhoods. These standards promote residential development patterns and are intended to protect and enhance desirable neighborhood characteristics, livability, and harmonious, orderly, and efficient growth and development. The underlying zoning district establishes the permitted uses and standards and shall remain in effect. The requirements of the overlay district are to be applied in addition to the underlying zoning district standards. The ROO overlay standard is as follows: Occupancy of either, a detached single-family dwelling or accessory living quarter, shall not exceed two unrelated persons per single-family dwelling or accessory living quarter. Related persons are specified in Section 11.2 ‘Defined Terms’ in the definition of ‘Family.’ Accessory living quarter requirements are further specified in Section 6.5 ‘Accessory Uses’ within the standards for ‘Living Quarters.’ Page 43 of 128 UDO sections 3.3 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning), 4.1 Establishment of Districts, and 5.11 Single-Family Overlay Districts detail the application process and regulations for single-family overlay districts and the ROO Process Handbook serves as a policy guide for residents. The process requires that a subdivision interested in pursuing a ROO form a Petition Committee. That committee is tasked with leading the effort, organizing their neighbors, hosting a neighborhood-led meeting and notifying all neighbors of the meeting via certified mail, collecting the petition signatures, and submitting the completed application and all required materials. Contiguous subdivisions can choose to work together and submit a joint application, provided that there is a representative from each original subdivision on the Petition Committee and that each subdivision submits a petition that meets the threshold of fifty (50) percent plus one (1) of signatures in support of the overlay for each subdivision. The Greater Southwood Petition Committee was comprised of eight members, with at least one representative from each subdivision: Laurie Cordes (Southwood 1), Jerry Fox (Southwood 1) Wendy Johnson (Southwood 1), Mary Dinkel (Southwood 2), April Dallis (Southwood 2A), Michael Atkinson (Southwood 6, 7, 9), Will McCauley (Southwood 10), and Steve Hand (Camelot Addition Section 2). The Petition Committee hosted their neighborhood meeting on March 30, 2023, discussed pursuing the ROO for their subdivisions, answered questions from their neighbors, and collected petition signatures. There were 27 attendees at the meeting, 19 were property owners and one was representing property owners who were not able to attend the meeting. City staff were present as well. Some property owners signed the petition at the meeting. The Petition Committee finished collecting petition signatures and submitted their ROO application on May 26, 2023. City staff verified that the application was complete, that all requirements were met, and that the ROO petition for each original subdivision met the signature threshold. The verified petition signatures in support of the ROO are as follows: • Southwood Section 1: 18 of 20 lots in support (90%) • Southwood Section 2: 8 of 13 lots in support (61.54%) • Southwood Section 2A: 3 of 4 lots in support (75%) • Southwood Section 6, 7 & 9: 21 of 38 lots in support (55.26%) • Southwood Section 10: 5 of 8 lots in support (62.5%) • Camelot Addition Section 2: 11 of 20 lots in support (55%) Staff held a required City-hosted neighborhood meeting for this ROO application request on July 24, 2023. There were approximately 12 attendees, with the majority of questions relating to the overall process and the legacy clause within the ROO. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The ROO zoning does not affect any of the physical characteristics of the underlying GS General Suburban zoning district. The existing subdivisions meet the dimensional standards for GS General Suburban zoned properties as set forth in the UDO and are already developed as single-family residential subdivisions. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: Page 44 of 128 The existing water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of these existing developments. No additional development and subsequent impacts are anticipated from the addition of the ROO zoning designation. 5. The marketability of the property: The single-family uses allowed by the GS General Suburban zoning district will remain and are marketable as single-family residential homes. The ROO only restricts the number of unrelated persons per single-family dwelling or accessory living quarters to no more than two unrelated persons. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Rezoning Map 3. Background Information 4. Future Land Use Map 5. Original Subdivision Plats 6. Applicant's Supporting Information 7. Petition Committee Members 8. Neighborhood Meeting Materials 9. Petition Signatures Page 45 of 128 Page 46 of 128 Page 47 of 128 Page 48 of 128 Page 49 of 128 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 7, 2023 Advertised Council Hearing Date: September 14, 2023 Property owner notices mailed: 105 Property tenant notices mailed: 134 Contacts in support: Four at the time of this report Contacts in opposition: One at the time of this report Inquiry contacts: Three at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Neighborhood Conservation GS General Suburban; D- Duplex Mixed Residential South Neighborhood Conservation GS General Suburban Residential East Neighborhood Conservation; Natural & Open Areas GS General Suburban Residential West Neighborhood Conservation GS General Suburban Public Facilities DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: January 1968 – August 1972 Zoning: R-1 Single-Family Residential R-1 Single-Family Residential renamed to GS General Suburban (2013) Final Plat: Southwood Section 1 (1967), Southwood Section 2 (1967), Southwood Section 2A (1968), Southwood Section 6,7,9 (1970), Southwood Section 10 (1972), Camelot Addition Section 2 (1972) Site development: Single-Family Residential Page 50 of 128 Page 51 of 128 Page 52 of 128 Page 53 of 128 Page 54 of 128 Page 55 of 128 Page 56 of 128 Page 57 of 128 Name of Project:GREATER SOUTHWOOD ROO Address:1817 SHADOWWOOD DR Legal Description:SOUTHWOOD PH 1, BLOCK 2, LOT 7 Total Acreage:0 Applicant:: Property Owner:JOHNSON BLAIRE & WENDY WENDY JOHNSON List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The contiguous subdivions represented in this ROO application were originally developed between 1967 & 1972 for SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. For many years, residents have enjoyed the benefits of living in a family-oriented neighborhood: desirable neighborhood characteristics & livability, well maintained homes & yards, safety, and a harmonious, orderly community that fosters long-term relationships. We are not just neighbors. Many of us are friends who feel like family. Our neighborhood is zoned for single-family homes, but an ever-increasing number of these homes have been purchased by real estate investors who desire to maximize profit by offering homes to the maximum number of renters per home as possible. This is negatively impacting the benefits of living in single-family zoned subdivison. We would like to preserve our positive neighborhood characteristics and benefits. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. Yes, this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan for ³viable and attractive neighborhoods that maintain long-term neighborhood integrity.´ How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The properties within the ROO will continue the current use as single family homes. REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 Page 58 of 128 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The ROO is a single family overlay and being applied to this neighborhood is suitable with the SF character of the area. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The ROO is a single family overlay and being applied to this neighborhood is suitable with the SF character of the area. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The ROO will not change the marketability of the current area. List any other reasons to support this zone change. 62% of neighbors signed a petition in favor of ROO Page 2 of 2 Page 59 of 128 Page 60 of 128 Page 61 of 128 Page 62 of 128 Page 63 of 128 Page 64 of 128 Page 65 of 128 Page 66 of 128 Page 67 of 128 Page 68 of 128 Page 69 of 128 Page 70 of 128 Page 71 of 128 Page 72 of 128 Page 73 of 128 Page 74 of 128 Page 75 of 128 September 7, 2023 Item No. 5.3. 710 Vassar Court Rezoning Sponsor: Jesse Dimeolo Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from D Duplex to MF Multi-Family for approximately 0.35 acres located at Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lot 22, generally located at 710 Vassar Court. Case #REZ2023-000063 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 14, 2023 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Neighborhood Integrity • Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this rezoning request as it is in line with the Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the surrounding area. Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 0.35 acres of land generally located at 710 Vassar Court from D Duplex to MF Multi-Family. It is the applicant’s intent to construct a multifamily product resembling townhomes on the property. Rather than have individually platted lots, the applicant intends to have the future townhomes on a single multifamily lot, allowing for higher density and more cost-effective living options in the area. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject tract is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map as Urban Residential. For the Urban Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the following: Areas that are appropriate for a range of high-density multifamily and attached residential development in various forms including townhomes, apartment buildings, mixed-use buildings, and limited non-residential uses that are compatible with the surrounding area. The intent of the district is to: • Accommodate a wide range of attractive multifamily housing for a diverse population. • Buildings may be clustered and grouped. Building setback from street varies but is generally consistent within a development. • Provide vehicular and pedestrian connectivity between developments. • Accommodate streetscape features such as sidewalks, street trees, and lighting. The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within this land use include: multifamily, townhouse, mixed-use, and limited suburban commercial zoning. This rezoning request aligns with the Comprehensive Plan. Page 76 of 128 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The Lincoln Place subdivision is a well-defined residential area that is bounded by public rights-of- ways on three sides and a general commercial area to the northwest. An undeveloped commercial area to the northeast, that is within walking distance, will provide additional commercial opportunities for residents in this subdivision. Increased density in this area is beneficial and in line with the future land use designation. The proposed zoning district is appropriate for the surrounding area as it will allow for additional residential in the area that is identified for higher density residential. Starting at the eastern edge of the Lincoln Place subdivision, the subject property shares a rear property line with single-family residences along Lincoln Avenue. The subject property also shares property side lot lines with duplexes along Vassar Court. The existing duplex uses are not consistent with the future land use and will continue to see redevelopment as more multifamily projects come in to meet the vision for urban residential land uses in the area. Across Vassar Court, density is a little higher with multifamily structures (fourplexes) to the north and northwest. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: While this area is slated for higher density residential, due to the smaller size of the lot being rezoned, only a small-scale multifamily product would be able to be constructed here. The smaller size would not create a conflict with the adjacent properties, but rather provide a good transition. The site has adequate space to meet the minimal dimensional standards as set forth in the Unified Development Ordinance and the minimum and maximum dwelling units per acre requirement. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of this development. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. Overall, peak runoff cannot exceed current site conditions after development. The subject property fronts Vassar Court, but access to the property will be from the alley to the rear. 5. The marketability of the property: With its proximity to Texas A&M University, the property is marketable. The applicant states that there is a strong demand for multifamily units that can provide cost-effective living options in the area. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Background Information 4. Applicant's Supporting Information 5. Rezoning Map 6. Future Land Use Map Page 77 of 128 Page 78 of 128 Page 79 of 128 Page 80 of 128 TEXAS AVE.TARROWST.ASHBURNAVE.U N I V E R S I T Y D R . E VASSAR CTSITELINCOLN AVE.PUBLIC WAYLINCOLN PLACE PH 2,BLOCK C, LOT 22Acres: 0.35Existing Zoning:D DUPLEX12345678910TARROW STLINCOLN AVE WELLESLEY CT 20' PrivateAccessEasement10' UtilityEasementVASSAR CT PUBLIC WAY12345678910LINCOLN PLACE PH 2,BLOCK C, LOT 22Acres: 0.35Proposed Zoning:MF MULTI-FAMILY20' PrivateAccessEasement10' UtilityEasementLI N C O L N A V ETARROW STV A S S A R C T WE L L E S L E Y C TEXISTING PROPOSED LEGEND GS GENERALSUBURBAN1" = 750'Scale:1 inch = 60 feetVICINITY MAPD DUPLEXPROPOSED 2-LANEMAJOR COLLECTOR NOTES: 1.Per Map 48041C0215F, no FEMA Floodplain exists onthis property.MF MULTIFAMILYPDD PLANNEDDEVP. DISTRICTEXISTING 2-LANEMAJOR COLLECTOREXISTING 2-LANELOCAL STREETPage 81 of 128 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 7, 2023 Advertised Council Hearing Date: September 14, 2023 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: College Woodlands HOA College Hills Estates HOA College Hills HOA Property owner notices mailed: 31 Property tenant notices mailed: 4 Contacts in support: None at the time of this report Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Urban Residential R-4 Multi-Family Apartments South Mixed Residential GS General Suburban Townhomes East Urban Residential D Duplex Duplexes West Urban Residential D Duplex Duplexes DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1956 Zoning: R-1 Single-Family Residential upon annexation R-1 Single-Family Residential to R-2 Duplex (1981) Renamed from R-2 Duplex to D Duplex (2013) Final Plat: Platted as Lincoln Place Subdivision, Phase 2, Block C, Lot 22 in 1981 Site development: Duplex Page 82 of 128 Name of Project:710 VASSAR COURT Address:710 VASSAR CT Legal Description:LINCOLN PLACE PH 2, BLOCK C, LOT 22 Total Acreage:0.35 Applicant:: Property Owner:EASTGATE EQUITY LLC MITCHELL & MORGAN List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. Developing townhomes in College Station is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it provides much-needed housing options for the growing population of students and young professionals in the area. Secondly, townhomes offer a more affordable and manageable alternative to single-family homes, making homeownership more accessible for individuals and families. Lastly, the development of townhomes promotes community building and a sense of belonging, fostering a vibrant and diverse neighborhood in College Station. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. The Comprehensive plan indicates these properties are designated as Urban Residential uses. The Urban Residential land use designation generally allows for high-density, multi-family uses that is able to conform to various forms of development including townhomes, apartments, and mixed-use buildings. Rezoning this property to MF Multi-Family is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan as Urban Residential allows for multi-family residential uses. Rezoning houses to multi-family units are beneficial as it allows for increased housing density, maximizing land use efficiency and addressing the growing demand for housing near Texas A&M University. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? Duplex units are suitable for this area due to the development character of the surrounding properties. However, multi-family development allows for higher density housing, which is more appropriate for the future land use plan for the area REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 Page 83 of 128 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. MF Multi-family zoning is compatible with the future land use designation on the property and will further implement the Comprehensive Plan for the area. The MF Multi-family zoning district allows for higher density, which is greatly needed for properties close to Texas A&M University. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. MF Multi-family zoning is compatible with the future land use designation on the property and will further implement the Comprehensive Plan for the area. The MF Multi-family zoning district allows for higher density, which is greatly needed for properties close to Texas A&M University. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. This property is highly marketable within College Station for several reasons. The proximity to Texas A&M University makes it an attractive option for students, faculty, and staff who desire convenient access to campus facilities and amenities. And the demand for affordable housing in the area creates a strong market for multi-family units that can provide cost-effective living options. List any other reasons to support this zone change. N/A Page 2 of 2 Page 84 of 128 Page 85 of 128 Page 86 of 128 September 7, 2023 Item No. 5.4. 1601 Sebesta Road Rezoning Sponsor: Anthony Armstrong Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from M-1 Light Industrial to SC Suburban Commercial for approximately 0.9663 acres located at 1601 Sebesta Road, generally located on the north side of Sebesta Road across from Foxfire Drive. Case #REZ2023-000065 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 28, 2023 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Neighborhood Integrity • Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this rezoning request as it is in line with the Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the surrounding area. Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 0.9663 acres of land generally located at 1601 Sebesta Road from M-1 Light Industrial to SC Suburban Commercial. It is the applicant's intent to rezone this property to be in line with the Comprehensive Plan to allow for more neighborhood commercial uses like retail sales. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject tract is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map as Neighborhood Commercial. For the Neighborhood Commercial land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the following: Areas of commercial activities that cater primarily to nearby residents. These areas tend to be smaller format than general commercial and located adjacent to major roads along the fringe of residential areas. Design of these structures is compatible in size, architecture, and lot coverage with surrounding residential uses. The intent of the district is to accommodate limited commercial services compared to General Commercial, as well as encourage transitions in building height and mass when adjacent to residential neighborhoods. This area of Neighborhood Commercial is located as a step down from the more intense General Commercial areas against the highway, towards the residential land uses to the east. The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within this land use include suburban commercial and office zoning. This rezoning request aligns with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the Page 87 of 128 context of the surrounding area: The subject property is directly adjacent to the Century Hill Development Subdivision, which extends to the west and north to the SH 6 frontage road. Century Hill Development has a pool supply company and office building near the subject property, and a car dealership and large restaurant with highway frontage. There is property to the north of the subject tract that is currently under construction as an assisted living facility, which is zoned PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning of SC Suburban commercial. To the east are warehouses located adjacent to the Emerald Forest single family neighborhood. The subject property’s location of being between the commercial center and a single family neighborhood makes SC Suburban Commercial zoning an appropriate designation for this property, and is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. This rezoning also removes the potential for light industrial uses close to the existing neighborhoods. The existing zoning of M-1 Light Industrial allows for uses that would be inconsistent with the adjacent neighborhood, such as outdoor storage. The UDO defines light industrial as, "A use engaged in the manufacture, predominantly from previously prepared materials, of finished products or parts, including processing, fabrication, assembly, treatment, packaging, incidental storage, sales, and distribution of such products, but excluding basic industrial processing." The proposed zoning of Suburban commercial allows for a variety of neighborhood friendly uses such as day cares, health clubs, dry cleaners, and personal service shops. These uses are more appropriate for the surrounding area than those of light industrial. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The subject property is already developed with two existing buildings and associated parking. The current use of the buildings is office, which is allowed in the SC Suburban Commercial zoning district. The subject property's smaller acreage of under one acre lends the site to be better developed or redeveloped under the SC Suburban Commercial zoning standards versus M-1 Light Industrial, which tends to be bigger lots with larger footprints. For reference, the zoning district that replaced M- 1 Light Industrial when it was retired was BPI Business Park Industrial, which requires a minimum of five acres. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of this site. As the applicant has no desire to change the layout of the site, all existing utilities will suffice to continue serving the existing buildings. In the event that additional development is sought, any drainage or infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject property currently drains to Sebesta Road and eventually to Bee Creek. A TIA was not required on this rezoning request as the potential trip rate is below the 150 peak trip threshold. 5. The marketability of the property: With its location between a General Commercial center and an Estate neighborhood, the opportunity for neighborhood-centered commercial uses makes the property more marketable for potential tenants, such as retail sales or service shops. This rezoning request will expand the number of allowed uses on the property, while also removing the industrial-related ones. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: Page 88 of 128 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Future Land Use Map 3. Rezoning Map 4. Rezoning Exhibit 5. Background Information 6. Applicant's Supporting Information Page 89 of 128 Page 90 of 128 Page 91 of 128 Page 92 of 128 Page 93 of 128 Page 94 of 128 VANNO PARKINGDRAWN BY:APPROVED BY:DATE:SHEET NO.:JOB NUMBER:SCALE:DPBDPB1 OF 1TBD1"=40'REZONING EXHIBIT 1601 SEBESTA ROAD COLLEGE STATION, TXTHIS EXHIBIT HAS BEENPREPARED BY DANIEL BEAMON,P.E. #105876. THIS EXHIBITSHALL BE USED FOR REFERENCEONLY AND SHALL NOT BE USEDFOR BIDDING OR CONSTRUCTION.JULY 27, 2023TBPE FIRM NO. F-21588 16172 BENCH LANE BRYAN, TEXAS 77807BEAMON ENGINEERINGB LEGENDPROPERTY BOUNDARYCITY LIMITSNOTES:1.THE BEARINGS OF THIS SURVEY AREBASED ON THE TEXAS STATE PLANECOORDINATE SYSTEM, CENTRAL ZONE,NAD83(2011) EPOCH 20102.NO PART OF THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHINA SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA,ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATEMAP NO. 48041C0305F, REVISED APRIL 2,2014.AREA TO BE REZONEDPage 95 of 128 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 7, 2023 Advertised Council Hearing Date: September 28, 2023 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Sandstone HOA Emerald Forest HOA Foxfire HOA Property owner notices mailed: 13 Property tenant notices mailed: 2 Contacts in support: None at the time of this report Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report Inquiry contacts: 2 at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use Northeast Neighborhood Commercial M-1 Light Industrial Warehouses Southeast Estate Residential E Estate Church Southwest Neighborhood Commercial M-1 Light Industrial Pool supply Northwest Neighborhood Commercial M-1 Light Industrial Undeveloped DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1977 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation A-O Agricultural Open to M-1 Light Industrial (1979) Final Plat: Platted as Replat of Lot 1B, Agency Records Control Inc. Subdivision, Block 1, Lot 2B in 2004 Site development: Office Page 96 of 128 Name of Project:REZONE FROM RETIRED M1 TO SC PER COMP PLAN (REZ2023-000065) Address:1601 SEBESTA RD Legal Description:AGENCY RECORD CONTROL, LOT 2B, ACRES 0.9663 Total Acreage:0.9663 Applicant:: Property Owner:YANCY HERITAGE HOLDINGS LTD Bob Yancy List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. Subject Property is situated at the gateway to multiple neighborhoods and is currently zoned M1, but is specified as Neighborhood Commercial on the Comp Plan. Thus, Suburban Commercial (SC) is a more appropriate zoning for this property. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. Yes, this proposed zone change is in accordance with the Comp Plan. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The property's current utilization as Office is compatible at the current zoning of M1 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The property is less than 15,000 sq ft., thus ensuring its compatibility with Neighborhood Commercial Retail sales & Service, Personal Services, Office, etc.; the property has adequate parking spaces to satisfy SC Requirements. REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 Page 97 of 128 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The property is less than 15,000 sq ft., thus ensuring its compatibility with Neighborhood Commercial Retail sales & Service, Personal Services, Office, etc.; the property has adequate parking spaces to satisfy SC Requirements. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The property is well maintained, aesthetically appealing and situated in a central location List any other reasons to support this zone change. To accommodate NC tenants, in addition to its current utilization in accordance with the Comp Plan Page 2 of 2 Page 98 of 128 September 7, 2023 Item No. 5.5. Parking and Access Standards for MH Middle Housing Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 5.2 “Residential Zoning District Dimensional Standards,” Article 7.3 “Off-Street Parking Standards,” and Article 7.4 “Access Management and Circulation,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, regarding parking and access standards for developments in the MH Middle Housing zoning district. Case #ORDA2023-000005. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 14, 2023 City Council Meeting – subject to change.) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval. Summary: At the August 10, 2023 City Council meeting, staff gave a presentation on the results of the City-initiated middle housing rezonings public engagement and sought direction on which cases to bring forward. Additionally, staff suggested several amendments to MH Middle Housing zoning district based on feedback from the public and the development community. The City Council gave direction for staff to pursue an ordinance amendment to increase the maximum number of parking spaces in the front yard in the MH Middle Housing zoning district. In conversations with the development community, concerns were raised about the parking and access standards in MH Middle Housing. The current district standards require that parking be located in the rear yard when the required number of parking spaces exceeds three (3). While the intent of the district is to create a more walkable pattern of lots, with buildings lining the streets, this standard may limit an applicant’s desire rezone a property to MH Middle Housing, when a property’s current zoning district would allow four (4) spaces in the front yard. Staff is proposing to amend the district standard to increase the maximum number of parking spaces in the front yard to no more than four (4) as long as the parking area does not make up more than fifty percent (50%) of the front yard. This would allow single-family, duplex, and townhouse uses to park in the front yard, if they choose, and require shared housing uses and multiplex developments to park in the rear yard. Finally, in Section 7.4.e, a clarity amendment is being provided to state that when rear parking is provided, one driveway can be provided to serve two lots. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Sec. 5.2. Residential Zoning District Dimensional Standards redlines 2. Sec. 7.3. Off-Street Parking Standards redlines 3. Sec. 7.4. Access Management and Circulation redlines Page 99 of 128 B. MH Middle Housing Product Types and Dimensional Standards Table. The following table establishes dimensional standards that shall be applied within the MH Middle Housing zoning district unless otherwise identified in this UDO. MH Middle Housing Product Types and Dimensional Standards KEY: SF = square feet Product Type Live-Work Townhouse Reduced Setback Single- Family Single- Family Courtyard Houses Split-Lot Duplex Duplex Small Multiple x Medium Multiple x Min. Lot Area per Dwelling Unit 2,250 SF 2,250 SF 2,250 SF 3,200 SF 4,000 SF 2,250 SF 2,250 SF 1,500 SF 800 SF Min. Lot Width 25' 25' 25' 40' 40' 25' 50’ 60' (a) 80' Min. Lot Depth 90' 90' 90' 80' 80' 90' 90' 100' 100' Max. Number of Attached Units N/A 6 N/A N/A N/A 2 2 4 12 Min. Front Setback 15' (b) 15' (b) 15' (b) 15' (b) 5' 15' (b) 15' (b) 15' (b) 15' (b) Max. Front Setback 25' 25' 25' 25' 15' 25' 25' 25' 25' Min. Side Setback 5' 5' 5' (c) 5' 5' 5' 5' 10' 10' Min. Side Street Setback 5' 5' 5' 5' 15' (b) 5' 5' 5' 5' Min. Setback between Structures 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 20' Min. Rear Setback (d) (e) 40' 40' 40' 40' 20' 40' 40' 40' 40' Max. Impervious Cover 55% (g) 55% (g) 55% (g) 55% (g) 55% (g) 55% (g) 55% (g) (f) (f) Max. Height (h) (i) (j) 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' Min. Number of Stories 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 Max. Dwelling Units/Acre (Subdivision Gross) 16 16 16 12 16 20 20 24 24 Parking Front/Rear (k) Front/Rear (k) Front/Rear (k) Front/Rear/ Side (k) Rear Front/ Rear (k) Front/ Rear (k) Rear Rear Notes: Page 101 of 128 (a) For small multiplex products, lot width may be reduced to thirty (30) feet if the building is two (2) stories or taller. (b) The Administrator may decrease the minimum setback to less than fifteen (15) feet, but not less than five (5) feet, with an administrative adjustment if there are no utility or right‐of‐way constraints. (c) For zero lot line development, refer to the Lots Subsection of the General Requirements and Minimum Standards of Design for Subdivisions within the City Limits Section of Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements of this UDO. (d) The rear setback shall be increased by the width of the required landscaping buffer when abutting Suburban Residential, Estate Residential, or Rural land uses as depicted in the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map. (e) The rear setback can be reduced to twenty (20) feet if abutting an alley or front or side parking is provided. (f) Maximum impervious cover shall be determined by an engineered drainage analysis performed in conjunction with the Drainage Section of the Bryan/College Station Unified Design Guidelines and approved by the City Engineer or their designee. (g) Additional impervious cover may be allowed as determined by an engineered drainage analysis performed in conjunction with the Drainage Section of the Bryan/College Station Unified Design Guidelines and approved by the City Engineer or their designee. (h) Public, civic, and institutional structures shall have a maximum building height of fifty (50) feet in this district. (i) Refer to the Easterwood Field Airport Zoning Ordinance regarding height limitations. (j) Shall abide by the Low‐Density Residential Height Protection Subsection in the General Provisions Section of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO. (k) Front parking shall be allowed only when four three (43) or fewer parking spaces are required on the lot. Page 102 of 128 public right-of-way (see graphic below). The driveway area shall be included in this calculation. Allowable Location for Parking for Detached Single-Family Uses 4. When existing detached single-family parking is expanded in front of the structure, it shall not exceed a size equivalent to fifty (50) percent of the front area as described above. 5. In the MH Middle Housing zoning district, single-family, duplexes, townhouses, and live-work units may locate parking in front of the structure as long as four (4) three or fewer parking spaces are required, and the parking area does not exceed a size equivalent of fifty (50) percent of the front area as described above. Page 103 of 128 6. In the MH Middle Housing zoning district, courtyard houses, duplexes, and multiplexes shall locate parking between the rear plane of the primary structure and the rear property line. 7. An eighteen (18) foot paved space (ninety (90) degree only) may be utilized where the space abuts a landscaped island with a minimum depth of four (4) feet. An eighteen (18) foot space may also be used when adjacent to a sidewalk provided that the minimum width of the sidewalk is six (6) feet. This standard shall also apply to off- street parking for single-family residential, duplexes, and townhouses. 8. The width of an alley may be assumed to be a portion of the maneuvering space requirement for off-street parking facilities located adjacent to a public alley. This standard shall apply for off-street parking for all uses including single-family residential, duplexes, townhouses, and small and medium multiplexes. 9. Each parking space intended for use by the handicapped shall be designed in accordance with the standards of the Texas Architectural Barriers Act (TABA) administered by the Texas Department of License and Regulation. 10. Each parking space and the maneuvering area thereto shall be located entirely within the boundaries of the building plot except where shared parking is approved by the City. 11. All parking spaces, aisles, and modules shall meet the minimum requirements, as shown in the following table. All dimensions are measured from face of curb to face of curb or wall to wall. Page 104 of 128 Sec. 7.4. Access Management and Circulation. A. Location of Existing and Planned Multi-Modal Routes. Any proposed development shall take into account the location of existing and planned multi-modal routes (i.e., bikeways, pedestrian ways, and transit routes) and provide pedestrian and/or vehicular connections to the route(s) within or adjacent to the development. B. Easements. 1. Street Access. No use shall be permitted to take direct access to a street except as allowed in this Section. a. Local Streets. All residential uses and associated visitor parking areas may take direct access to local streets. Residential visitor parking areas may take direct access to local streets via a driveway; however, no backing maneuvers onto local streets shall be allowed. Non-residential uses shall not take direct access to local streets, provided that any lot located within a non-residential subdivision or any parcel adjacent to a street within a non-residential subdivision may take direct access to the local street internal to the subdivision, and provided that any corner lot abutting a local street and an arterial or collector street or freeway/expressway may take access to the local street if such access is required by the highway governmental authority having jurisdiction. b. Minor Collector Streets. No single-family dwelling, duplex, or townhouse shall take direct access to minor collector streets except when permitted by Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements of this UDO. Residential visitor parking areas may take direct access to minor collector streets via a driveway; however, no backing maneuvers onto local streets shall be allowed. c. Major Collector Streets. No single-family dwelling, duplex, townhouse, or multiplex shall take direct access to major collector streets. Residential visitor parking areas may take direct access to major collector streets via a driveway; however, no backing maneuvers onto local streets shall be allowed. d. Arterial Streets. No single-family dwelling, duplex, townhouse, or multiplex shall take direct access to arterial streets. e. Shared Driveways. The Development Engineer may require a shared driveway at the time of platting, development, or redevelopment of the affected lots. When MH Middle Housing lots take access from a public street to provide rear parking, one (1) driveway shall be allowed for every two (2) lots, unless a rear alley is provided. The Administrator may approve up to three (3) lots to take access from a single driveway for rear parking if a shared access easement is provided. See the example diagram below: Page 105 of 128 MH Middle Housing Shared Driveways 2. Cross-Access Easements. a. If a parcel is to be developed for any non-residential land use, a cross-access easement shall be provided by the property owner to adjoining properties that front on the same street and that are, or may be, developed as non-residential land uses. b. Cross-access easements shall be situated parallel to the street right-of-way line abutting both parcels. The property owner shall maintain access easements. c. The property owner shall provide appropriate documentation of a good faith effort to extend the access easement through all immediately abutting properties. If such an effort fails, the portion of the easement on the subject site shall be developed and designed to ensure future connection to the neighboring properties. d. Where a cross-access easement is granted, no permanent structures or parking that would interfere with the proposed access shall be permitted in the easement. Some improvements such as medians and parking islands may be constructed within an access easement if it has been demonstrated that adequate circulation and cross access have been accomplished and that all applicable standards of this UDO have been met. e. The Development Engineer may waive the requirement for an easement of access required above in those cases where unusual topography or site conditions would render such an easement of no useable benefit to adjoining properties. f. The Development Engineer may approve the vacation of an easement of access in those cases where adjoining parcels are subsequently developed with a residential use. C. Driveway Access Location and Design. 1. General. a. It shall be unlawful for any person to cut, break, or remove any curb or install a driveway along a street except as herein authorized. Openings in the curb may be approved by the Development Engineer for the purposes of drainage. Page 106 of 128 September 7, 2023 Item No. 5.6. High Occupancy Ordinance (HOO) Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Section 1.10 “Transitional Provisions,” Section 4.1 “Establishment of Districts,” Section 5.10 “Overlay Districts,” and Section 6.3 “Types of Use” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, for the creation of the HOO High Occupancy Overlay. Case #ORDA2023-000004. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 14, 2023 City Council Meeting – subject to change.) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Neighborhood Integrity • Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval. Summary: At the August 10, 2023 City Council meeting, staff gave a presentation on the results of the City-initiated middle housing rezoning public engagement and sought direction on which cases to bring forward. Additionally, staff suggested several amendments to the MH Middle Housing zoning district based on feedback from the public and the development community. During conversations with the public, concerns were identified relating to allowing Shared Housing uses (a use that allows more than one family to reside in a single dwelling unit) within all the areas being considered for City-initiated MH Middle Housing. Staff recommended and the City Council gave direction for the removal of the Shared Housing use from the MH Middle Housing zoning district and to instead allow the use through an overlay district, known as a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. Shared housing will continue to be allowed by right in MF Multi-Family and the Northgate zoning districts. By doing this, the City could better define where Shared Housing would be located. This amendment only creates the HOO High Occupancy Overlay district. A future amendment in October would remove Shared Housing from the MH Middle Housing zoning district as a permitted use. These are being done as separate amendments so that we don’t create any non-conforming uses. Following the amendment in October, the City Council would then consider the rezoning of properties to MH Middle Housing and/or to HOO High Occupancy Overlay. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Section 1.10 Transitional Provisions redlines 2. Section 4.1 Establishment of Districts redlines 3. Section 5.10 Overlay Districts redlines 4. Section 6.3 Types of Use redlines Page 107 of 128 Sec. 1.10. Transitional Provisions. A. Pending Construction. 1. Building Permits. As provided by Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended, nothing in this UDO shall require any change in plans, construction, size, or designated use of any building, structure, or part thereof that has been granted a building permit prior to the effective date of this UDO, or any amendment to this UDO, provided construction shall begin consistent with the terms and conditions of the building permit and proceed to completion in a timely manner. 2. Approved Site Plans. Nothing in this UDO shall require a change in a site plan approved prior to the effective date of this UDO, provided a building permit is issued prior to expiration of the site plan, and construction begins consistent with the terms and conditions of the building permit and proceeds to completion in a timely manner. B. Zoning Districts. 1. Retained Districts. The following zoning districts and district names in effect prior to the effective date of this UDO and represented on the Official Zoning Map of the City of College Station shall remain in effect. Those districts are shown in the following table: Retained District Name Effective Date WPC Wolf Pen Creek Development Corridor June 13, 2003 NG-1 Core Northgate June 13, 2003 NG-3 Residential Northgate June 13, 2003 CU College and University June 13, 2003 PDD Planned Development District June 13, 2003 OV Corridor Overlay June 13, 2003 2. Renamed Districts. The following zoning districts shall henceforth be renamed as shown in the following table: Previous District Previous Name New District New Name Effective Date A-OX Existing Rural Residential A-O Agricultural-Open June 13, 2003 R-1A Single-Family Residential R-1 Single-Family Residential June 13, 2003 R-6 Apartment High Density R-6 High Density Multi-Family June 13, 2003 M-1 Planned Industrial M-1 Light Industrial June 13, 2003 NG-2 Commercial Northgate NG-2 Transitional Northgate April 2, 2006 A-P Administrative Professional O Office October 7, 2012 C-1 General Commercial GC General Commercial October 7, 2012 C-2 Commercial Industrial CI Commercial Industrial October 7, 2012 A-O Agricultural Open R Rural September 22, 2013 A-OR Rural Residential Subdivision E Estate September 22, 2013 R-1 Single-Family Residential GS General Suburban September 22, 2013 R-2 Duplex Residential D Duplex September 22, 2013 R-3 Townhouse T Townhouse September 22, 2013 R-7 Manufactured Home Park MHP Manufactured Home Park September 22, 2013 Page 108 of 128 WPC Wolf Pen Creek Development Corridor WPC Wolf Pen Creek August 20June 22, 2023 3. Combined Districts. The following zoning districts shall henceforth be combined as reflected in the following table: Combined Districts Name New District New Name Effective Date R-4 Apartment/Low Density R-4 Multi-Family June 13, 2003 R-5 Apartment/Medium Density C-B Business Commercial C-1 General Commercial June 13, 2003 C-1 General Commercial C-3 Planned Commercial C-3 Light Commercial June 13, 2003 C-N Neighborhood Business 4. Retired Districts. The following districts are no longer eligible for Official Zoning Map amendment requests. Properties with the following designations at the time of this amendment retain all uses, regulations, and requirements associated with these districts. Retired District Name Effective Date C-3 Light Commercial October 7, 2012 R&D Research & Development October 7, 2012 M-1 Light Industrial October 7, 2012 M-2 Heavy Industrial October 7, 2012 R-1B Single-Family Residential September 22, 2013 R-4 Multi-Family December 28, 2014 R-6 High Density Multi-Family December 28, 2014 NPO Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay June 21, 2020 5. New Districts. The following districts are hereby created and added to those in effect at the time of the adoption of this UDO. New District Name Effective Date RDD Redevelopment District June 13, 2003 P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use Development June 13, 2003 NCO Neighborhood Conservation Overlay December 13, 2007 HP Historic Preservation Overlay September 11, 2008 NAP Natural Areas Protected October 7, 2012 SC Suburban Commercial October 7, 2012 BP Business Park October 7, 2012 BPI Business Park Industrial October 7, 2012 RS Restricted Suburban September 22, 2013 MF Multi-Family December 28, 2014 MU Mixed-Use December 28, 2014 WE Wellborn Estate August 7, 2016 WRS Wellborn Restricted Suburban August 7, 2016 WC Wellborn Commercial August 7, 2016 ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay April 19, 2021 Page 109 of 128 MH Middle Housing November 6, 2022 HOO High Occupancy Overlay September 24, 2023 6. Redesignated District. Henceforth all areas designated PUD Planned Unit Development shall be redesignated PDD Planned Development Districts. The individual ordinances that created the PUD Planned Unit Developments shall remain in effect, along with all provisions and conditions listed therein. Any modification of a former PUD Planned Unit Development shall follow the provisions for PDD Planned Development Districts listed herein. Previous District Name Redesignated District Name Effective Date PUD Planned Unit Development PDD Planned Development District June 13, 2003 7. Deleted Districts. The following districts not existing on the Official Zoning Map are hereby deleted: Deleted District Name Effective Date C-PUD Commercial Planned Unit Development June 13, 2003 C-NG Commercial Northgate June 13, 2003 KO Krenek Tap Overlay April 22, 2018 Page 110 of 128 Sec. 4.1. Establishment of Districts. For the purpose of this UDO, portions of the city, as specified on the Official Zoning Map, are hereby divided into the zoning districts enumerated below. The intensity regulations applicable for such districts are designated in the respective Sections of Article 5, District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards, and the use regulations are designated in Article 6, Use Regulations of this UDO. Table of Districts Residential Zoning Districts R Rural WE Wellborn Estate E Estate WRS Wellborn Restricted Suburban RS Restricted Suburban GS General Suburban T Townhouse D Duplex MH Middle Housing MF Multi-Family MU Mixed-Use MHP Manufactured Home Park Non-Residential Zoning Districts O Office SC Suburban Commercial WC Wellborn Commercial GC General Commercial CI Commercial Industrial BP Business Park BPI Business Park Industrial CU College and University NAP Natural Areas Protected Retired Districts R-1B Single-Family Residential R-4 Multi-Family R-6 High Density Multi-Family C-3 Light Commercial M-1 Light Industrial M-2 Heavy Industrial R&D Research & Development NPO Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay Planned Districts P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use District PDD Planned Development District Design Districts WPC Wolf Pen Creek NG-1 Core Northgate NG-2 Transitional Northgate NG-3 Residential Northgate Overlay Districts OV Corridor Overlay RDD Redevelopment District HP Historic Preservation Overlay Page 111 of 128 HOO High Occupancy Overlay Single-Family Overlay Districts ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay NCO Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Page 112 of 128 Sec. 5.10. Overlay Districts. In the event an area is rezoned to apply an overlay district, this district shall apply to all multi‐family, commercial, and industrial property, and where applicable, to single‐family, duplex, or townhouse development. The underlying district establishes the permitted uses and shall remain in full force, and the requirements of the overlay district are to be applied in addition to the underlying use and site restrictions. A. OV Corridor Overlay. This district is established to enhance the image of gateways and key entry points, major corridors, and other areas of concern, as determined by the City Council, by maintaining a sense of openness and continuity. The following supplemental standards shall apply to this district: 1. Setbacks. All buildings will be set back forty (40) feet from the right‐of‐way. Where parking is located in the front of the building, there shall be a front setback of twenty (20) feet from the right‐of‐way to the parking area and all drive aisles. 2. Signs. Freestanding signs shall be limited to the restrictions of the Signs Section of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO but shall not exceed the height of the building. 3. Building Colors. Building colors shall be neutral and harmonious with the existing man‐made or natural environment, and only compatible accent colors shall be used. All colors shall be approved by the Administrator. The applicant must provide elevation drawings and color samples. 4. Special Restrictions for Retail Fuel Sales. In cases where the underlying zoning district allows fuel sales and a station is proposed, the following restrictions shall apply: a. Activities Restricted. 1) No major emergency auto repair; and 2) No body, fender, or paint work. b. Signs. 1) Sign height shall be restricted by the provisions of the Signs Section of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO but shall not exceed the height of the building. 2) No freestanding fuel price signage shall be permitted. 3) Signs for air, water, and other similar services or products must meet the criteria for exempt signs as provided in the Signs Section of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO. B. RDD Redevelopment District. The purpose of this district is to facilitate the redevelopment of existing nonconforming commercial centers through flexible or relaxed standards, which can accommodate existing physical limitations and take extraordinary circumstances into account. The RDD Redevelopment District is an overlay district. The permissible uses on any site shall be governed by the underlying zoning. The following supplemental standards shall apply to this district: 1. Location. Page 113 of 128 An RDD Redevelopment District may be established upon any commercially zoned property where the initial development was developed a minimum of twenty (20) years before the rezoning request and the proposed redevelopment meets the intent of this Section. Special consideration should be given to those areas considered "gateways" and/or historic, and those with proximity to Texas A&M University. 2. Standards. Although every effort should be made to meet all requirements of this UDO, designated RDD Redevelopment Districts may be allowed to waive up to fifty (50) percent of required parking standards and landscaping where physical limitations and the site's location and relationship to the goals of the Comprehensive Plan warrant consideration. A lesser percentage may be established as part of the approval process. 3. Criteria for Evaluation. Evaluation of all sites and site plans for rezoning to RDD Redevelopment District shall consider the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Aesthetic contribution of the proposed redevelopment; c. Economic viability of the existing site; d. Physical limitations and the demonstrated inability to meet current requirements; e. Public health and safety standards; and f. Effort made to meet all standards of this UDO. g. Full engineering of sites may not be required for the establishment of an RDD Redevelopment District; however, a preliminary engineering study will be required which assesses parking, vehicular access and circulation, drainage, and utility requirements. 4. Procedure for Establishment. The procedure for rezoning to RDD Redevelopment District shall be the same as any other rezoning application except that a site plan of the proposed redevelopment of the site shall be carefully evaluated to ascertain the site plan's benefit to achieving the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Elevations of proposed structures may be required as part of the review process, or to determine eligibility for rezoning. Full engineering may not be required for evaluating a property for rezoning. Varying levels of information may be required by the Administrator depending upon the peculiarities of any given site. The site plan components shall govern the redevelopment of the site following the approval of an RDD Redevelopment District. C. HP Historic Preservation Overlay. 1. Purpose. The HP Historic Preservation Overlay is intended to provide for the protection and preservation of places and areas of historical, cultural, and architectural importance and significance. Such action is necessary to promote the economic, cultural, educational, and general welfare of the public. Specifically, this district has the following expressed purposes: a. To protect and enhance the landmarks and districts which represent distinctive elements of College Station's historic, architectural, and cultural heritage; b. To foster civic pride in the accomplishments of the past; Page 114 of 128 c. To protect and enhance College Station's attractiveness to visitors and the support and stimulus to the economy thereby provided; d. To ensure the harmonious, orderly, and efficient growth and development of College Station; e. To promote economic prosperity and welfare of the community by encouraging the most appropriate use of such property within College Station; and f. To encourage stabilization, restoration, and improvements of such properties and their values. 2. Applicability. The HP Historic Preservation Overlay may be applied to districts, areas, or individual property, regardless of the base zoning district or current use of the properties, that: a. Are at least forty (40) years old; b. Meet at least two (2) of the criteria listed below; and c. Possess historic integrity that is evident through historic qualities including location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. 3. Criteria for Designation of HP Historic Preservation Overlays. A property or district may be designated if it: a. Possesses significance in history, architecture, archeology, and culture; b. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local, regional, state, or national history; c. Is associated with events that have made a significant impact in our past; d. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; e. Represents the work of a master designer, builder, or craftsman; f. Represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood or city; or g. Is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, Recorded Texas Historic Landmark, or a State Archaeological Landmark, as determined by the Texas Historical Commission. 4. Removal of an HP Historic Preservation Overlay. Upon recommendation of the Landmark Commission to the Planning and Zoning Commission based upon new and compelling evidence and negative evaluation according to the same criteria and following the same procedures set forth in this UDO for designation, the Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council and the City Council may remove an HP Historic Preservation Overlay made under this Section. D. HOO High Occupancy Overlay. 1. Purpose. The purpose of this district is to accommodate increased residential occupancy through the permitting of shared housing as a use. The HOO High Occupancy Overlay aims to promote efficient land use and provide additional housing opportunities by allowing higher‐occupancy residential structures within specific areas of College Station where additional residential density is appropriate. 2. Applicability. The HOO High Occupancy Overlay may be applied where the base zoning district(s) of the area is MH Middle Housing, a multi‐family zoning district, or a mixed‐use zoning district. An area under this overlay shall consist of a property or contiguous properties that are of sufficient size that generally follow Page 115 of 128 visible geographic features of an area. It is not the intent for this overlay to be applied to small areas or individual lots. 3. Standards. In addition to the permitted uses of the base zoning district, shared housing is a permitted use. Page 116 of 128 Sec. 6.3. Types of Use. A. Uses of land or structures which are not expressly listed in the Use Table as permitted uses (P), permitted uses subject to specific use standards (P*), or conditional uses (C) in a zoning district or planned development are prohibited uses and shall not be established in that district or planned development. B. The Administrator shall determine whether or not an unlisted use, that is otherwise prohibited, as stated above should be processed. In doing so, the Administrator shall utilize purpose statements adopted herein in conjunction with the applicable zoning district, and consideration of the following criteria: 1. The actual or anticipated characteristics of the activity based on known characteristics of similar projects in standard planning practice; 2. The relative amount of site area, floor space, and equipment; 3. Relative volumes of sales from each activity; 4. The customer type for each activity; 5. The relative number of employees in each activity; 6. Hours of operation; 7. Building and site arrangement; 8. Vehicles used with the activity and the relative number of vehicle trips generated by the use; and 9. How the use advertises itself. C. Use Table. Except where otherwise specifically provided herein, regulations governing the use of land and structures with the various zoning districts and classifications of planned developments are hereby established as shown in the following Use Table. 1. Permitted Uses. A "P" indicates that a use is allowed by right in the respective district. Such uses are subject to all other applicable regulations of this UDO. 2. Permitted Uses Subject to Specific Standards. A "P*" indicates a use that will be permitted, provided that the use meets the provisions in the Specific Use Standards Section below. Such uses are also subject to all other applicable regulations of this UDO. 3. Conditional Uses. A "C" indicates a use that is allowed only where a conditional use permit is approved by the City Council. The Council may require that the use meet the additional standards enumerated in the Specific Use Standards Section below. Conditional uses are subject to all other applicable regulations of this UDO. Page 117 of 128 USE TABLE Specific Uses R WE E WRS RS GS T ** D ** MH MF ** MU ** MHP ** P‐MUD ** O SC ** WC GC CI BP ** BPI CU NAP R‐1B R‐4 ** R‐6 ** C‐3 ** M‐1 M‐2 R&D ** WPC ** NG‐1 ** NG‐2 ** NG‐3 ** HOO ** KEY: P = Permitted by Right P* = Permitted Subject to Specific Use Standards C= Conditional Use **= District with Supplemental Standards (refer to Article 5, District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards) RESIDENTIAL USES Assisted Living/Residential Care Facility P P P Boarding and Rooming House P P P P P Courtyard House P* Dormitory P P P P P P P P Duplex P P P P P Extended Care Facility/Convalescent/Nursing Home P P P P P P P P Fraternity/Sorority P P P P P P Manufactured Home P* P* P* Mixed‐Use Structure PP P PPPP Multi‐Family P P P P P C (a) P P P Multi‐Family built prior to January 2002 P P P P P P P P Multiplex, Medium P P Multiplex, Small P P Shared Housing P P P(d) P(d) P(d) P(d) P(d) P P P P Single‐Family Detached P P P P P P P P P P P Single‐Unit Dwelling P Split‐Lot Duplex P P Townhouse P PP P PP P Two‐Unit Dwelling P Live‐Work Unit P* P* P* PUBLIC, CIVIC, AND INSTITUTIONAL USES Educational Facility, College and University P Educational Facility, Indoor Instruction P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Educational Facility, Outdoor Instruction P C C P P P P Educational Facility, Primary and Secondary P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Page 118 of 128 Educational Facility, Tutoring P P P P P P P P P P P P P Educational Facility, Vocational/Trade P P P P P P P P Governmental Facilities P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P P P* P* P P P P P P* P* P* P P P P P P P P* Health Care, Hospitals P P Health Care, Medical Clinics P P P P P P P P P P Parks P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Places of Worship P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P P P P* P P P P P P* P* P* P P P P P P P P COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, AND RETAIL USES Agricultural Use, Barn or Stable for Private Stock P P P Agricultural Use, Farm or Pasturage P P P Agricultural Use, Farm Product Processing P Animal Care Facility, Indoor P P P P P P P P P P P P Animal Care Facility, Outdoor P* P Art Studio/Gallery P (c) P P P P P P P P P P P P Car Wash P* Commercial Garden, Greenhouse, or Landscape Maintenance P* P* P* P* P* P* Commercial Amusement P P P C C P* P* C P P P Conference/Convention Center P P P P P P P P Country Club P P P P P P P P P P Day Care, Commercial P (c) P P C P P P P P C C P P P P Drive‐In/Thru P* P C P* Dry Cleaners and Laundry P P P* P* P P* P P P* P* P* P* P* Fraternal Lodge P P P P P P Fuel Sales P* P* P* P Funeral Home P P P P Golf Course or Driving Range P* P* P* P* Page 119 of 128 Health Club/Sports Facility, Indoor P P P P P P P P P P P P Health Club/Sports Facility, Outdoor P P* P P P P P* P Hotel C (b) P P P P P P P P Mobile Food Court CC C C CCC Night Club, Bar, or Tavern C C C C C P P Office P (c) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Parking as a Primary Use P P C P P P P* Personal Service Shop P (c) P P P P P P P P P P P P Printing/Copy Shop PP PPPPPPP P P PPP Radio/TV Station/Studio P P P P P P P P P P P P* Recreational Vehicle Park C C Restaurant P P P P* P* P P* P P P P* Retail Sales ‐ Single Tenant over 50,000 SF P P P Retail Sales and Service P (c) P P P P* P* P* P* P P P P P Retail Sales and Service ‐ Alcohol C P P* P* P C P P Sexually Oriented Business P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* Shooting Range, Indoor P P P P P Theater P P P P P P P P Retail Sales, Manufactured Homes P P* Storage, Self Service P* P* P P P P* P Vehicular Sales, Rental, Repair, and Service P* P* P P* Wholesales/Services P* P* P P P P INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING USES Storage Tank/Cold Storage Plant P P P Micro‐Industrial P* P* P P* P* Industrial, Light P P P P P P Page 120 of 128 Industrial, Heavy P P Recycling Facility ‐ Large P* P P Salvage Yard P* P* Scientific Testing/Research Laboratory P P P P P Storage, Outdoor ‐ Equipment or Materials P P* P P P Truck Stop/Freight or Trucking Terminal P P Utility P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* Warehousing/Distribution P C P P P Waste Services P P Wireless Telecommunication Facilities ‐ Intermediate P* P* P* P* P* P* P P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* P* Wireless Telecommunication Facilities ‐ Major C P* C C C C P C C C P* C Wireless Telecommunication Facilities ‐ Unregulated P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Notes: (a) Multi‐family residential uses located in stories or floors above retail commercial uses are permitted by right. (b) Hotels are only allowed when accessory to a country club development and are limited to a maximum of fifteen (15) rooms. (c) Permitted in live‐work units only. (d) Permitted only when there is also a HOO High Occupancy Overlay.Page 121 of 128 Page 122 of 128 September 7, 2023 Item No. 5.7. PDS Plan of Work Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the PDS Plan of Work. Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Financial Sustainability • Core Services & Infrastructure • Neighborhood Integrity • Diverse & Growing Economy • Improving Mobility • Sustainable City Recommendation(s): To provide any further direction to staff on projects for the FY2024 Plan of Work. Summary: At the August 17, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting staff provided an update on the Plan of Work for FY2023 and draft projects for FY2024. This item is for any further discussion on any of the projects before they go for approval during the September 21, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. In addition to the Plan of Work for FY2024, any unfinished projects in FY2023 will also move to FY2024. Since the last meeting, we have added a few more projects, including updating additional building codes, flood ordinance amendments, and a cost of service study. As a reminder, every year the Planning and Development Services Department creates a plan of work that is approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The plan of work identifies the items that the department will work on during the year. By establishing a plan of work, it helps the department prioritize which projects they will undertake, as well as identify the resources it will take, both in terms of staff capacity and budget. The plan of work is established for each fiscal year (October - September), but projects may take multiple years to complete. There are times when additional projects get added throughout the year. However, this can have an impact on completing other projects on the plan of work. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. PDS Plan of Work FY2023 2. Draft PDS Plan of Work FY2024 Page 123 of 128 MultiPlan View Report 2023-08-07 - 03:06:01PM CDT 1 of 3 #Name Description Status Start Date Due Date Last Updated Last Comment 1 Bike Lane and Improvements Analysis Analyze roadways to determine prime candidates for the addition of bike lanes and/or improvements such as separated bike lanes. Not Started 05/01/2023 09/30/2023 07/13/2023 This project has been consolidated with the grant application for the Complete Streets Plan for Core of College Station which will start in FY 24 if awarded. If not awarded, will proceed with lesser internal effort. Existing Conditions and data collection will start later this summer regardless. 2 Bryan / College Station Unified Design GuidelinesUpdate These guidelines serve as a technical resource for the design and construction of activities in the rights-of-way or easements. This project involves updates to various portions of the guidelines. Off Track 10/01/2022 07/31/2024 07/25/2023 Limited staffing resources of contributing teams have delayed progress. 3 Census 2020 Follow Up Monitor Census 2020 data releases from the US Census Bureau. Once data is available, update population figures and projections, identify data trends and conduct analysis. Off Track 08/14/2023 09/30/2023 07/08/2023 The U.S. Census Bureau released the Detailed Demographic and Housing Characteristics (DHC) file in late May 2023. There is another planned release in September 2023 of the Detailed DHC-A that will provide additional racial and ethnic information. The Detailed DHC-B will follow, with no set date at this time, and it will add tenure information for racial and ethnic groups. We now have more timely data from the 2021 American Community Survey (ACS). Additionally, the 2022 ACS data will be released in December 2023. Staff in the Planning division will need to analyze all data sets later this year, likely in December 2023 or January 2024, and determine how to incorporate these data sets into a demographics/existing conditions report in 2024 that will precede the 5-year Comprehensive Plan update in 2025. 5 Options to Preserve Integrity of Neighborhoods Identify and analyze options that are intended to preserve the integrity of neighborhoods. Achieved 10/01/2022 12/31/2022 10/13/2022 Staff presented options to the City Council in April 2022, where direction was given. Staff then moved forward with creating a definition for Shared Housing that differentiated these types of uses from Single-Family. 6 Unified Development Ordinance Amendment - Off-Street Parking Requirements Explore the option of reducing or eliminating off-street parking requirements for certain uses and/or areas. On Track 10/01/2022 08/30/2023 07/13/2023 Ordinance amendment is scheduled to go before the Planning & Zoning Commission on July 20, 2023 and City Council on August 10, 2023. 7 Unified Development Ordinance Amendment -Creation of Middle Housing Zoning District Adopt an ordinance to create a "middle housing" zoning district, following the Comprehensive Plan update, to implement the new Mixed Residential land use category. Achieved 10/01/2022 12/31/2022 02/03/2023 Ordinance was adopted by the City Council on 10/27/2022. 8 Unified Development Ordinance Amendment - Lot-by-Lot Grading Determine whether the City should require a grading plan for individual lot developments.Achieved 01/01/2023 06/30/2023 07/03/2023 The ordinance was adopted at June 12, 2023 City Council meeting. 9 Unified Development Ordinance Amendment -Signs Review and update the City’s sign ordinance in light of the recent Supreme Court decisions regarding sign regulations based upon content and off-premise. Off Track 06/01/2023 09/30/2023 06/01/2023 Redrafted with UDO clean up version. Redrafting portions after attending ISA Sign Research Foundation webinar on 6/28. 10 Small Area Plan - Northeast GatewayRedevelopment Plan From the 10-Year Update to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, this project is to create a small area redevelopment plan for the general area surrounding Texas Avenue and University Drive. This project was recently rebranded the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan. On Track 10/01/2022 10/31/2023 07/08/2023 This planning effort remains on track. The third phase of public engagement concluded in April and staff is reviewing draft versions of plan content, schematics, and maps from the consultant team. Public review of the full draft plan is planned for late August or early September, with plan adoption to follow. 11 Traffic Congestion and Mobility Analysis Establish performance metrics to create an annual traffic congestion and mobility report, context-sensitive congestion maps, and a congestion mitigation toolkit document that includes travel demand management techniques, policy recommendations, traffic data tools, construction projects, and operational management methods. Off Track 07/01/2023 06/30/2024 07/13/2023 Project scope has been drafted and in process of being finalized to send out RFP request in July to solicit a consultant. Project is SLA with $80k in FY23 budget. Statuses Not Started 1 (4%)On Track 12 (52%) Off Track 6 (26%) Achieved 4 (17%) Due Dates Not Past Due 19(100%)Past Due 0 (0%) Progress Updates Up-to-Date 23(100%)Late 0 (0%) Pending 0 (0%) Page 124 of 128 MultiPlan View Report 2023-08-07 - 03:06:01PM CDT 2 of 3 #Name Description Status Start Date Due Date Last Updated Last Comment 12 Land Use Fiscal Analysis Prepare a land use fiscal analysis based on the Comprehensive Plan to determine the needed amount of specific land uses and whether that amount matches the Future Land Use & Character Map. From there, conduct a fiscal analysis based on the amount of land uses, and the cost to serve those land uses compared to the anticipated revenue generated from them. Off Track 07/01/2023 06/30/2024 07/08/2023 This project has not started to date, largely due to staffing changes within the Planning Division and the additional workload from the City-Initiated Middle Housing project. The division plans to launch this project before the end of FY23. 13 Small Area Plan - Wellborn District Plan Update The Wellborn Community Plan was adopted by City Council on April 25, 2013. The planning area is located in the southwestern portion of the City and includes much of the remaining historic Wellborn Community. Since 2013, several changes have occurred, as well as market conditions. Upon the completion of the Neighborhood Plan Audit project, staff will update this plan. On Track 10/01/2022 10/31/2023 07/08/2023 The Wellborn District Plan Update is on track. Staff held four area-wide meetings and associated working group meetings throughout January - May 2023, with active participation from residents, TxDOT, and various City staff and departments. Staff is drafting the plan and map revisions throughout summer 2023 and will have a full draft version ready for public review in September 2023, with plan adoption to follow. 14 Urban Heat Island Mitigation Plan Develop a five-year planting plan to mitigate some of the effects of the urban heat island.Achieved 10/01/2022 12/31/2022 10/01/2022 The City Council accepted the "Cooling" College Station plan in September of 2022. The next project involved with the plan is to identify funding opportunities to implement the plan. 15 Implement Complete Street and Context SensitiveDesign Amend the street cross sections and update the Unified Development Ordinance, the Bryan-College Station Unified Design Guidelines, and the City’s capital improvement process to implement context sensitive and complete street design such as prioritized mode corridors, reconstruction projects in established neighborhoods, and in areas where right-of-way is constrained. On Track 10/01/2022 10/31/2023 07/13/2023 Finalizing proposed thoroughfare cross sections and awaiting revised design elements from consultant. Once completed, will proceed with adopted updated cross sections into Comprehensive Plan in fall 2023. 16 Unified Development Ordinance Amendment -Sustainable Landscaping / Yards Analyze and make modifications to landscaping requirements within City ordinances to ensure that sustainable practices are allowed and encouraged. Off Track 01/01/2023 09/30/2023 07/13/2023 Staff is currently analyzing potential amendments. The scope has changed from just sustainable landscaping in yards to potentially other areas, as well as what requirements need to be submitted as part of a landscape plan. 17 Identify and Secure Funding Sources for UrbanHeat Islands Plan Identify and Secure Funding Sources for Urban Heat Islands Plan On Track 01/01/2023 12/31/2023 06/28/2023 Identified TAMU Forestry grant and CDBG Entitlement funds as possible sources of funding. 18 City-Initiated Rezoning to MH Middle Housing Identify and rezone properties to MH Middle Housing.On Track 03/01/2023 01/31/2024 07/08/2023 This project stems from Council direction during their adoption of the MH Middle Housing zoning district in October 2022. Staff established and met with a working group from November 2022 through February 2023 to identify appropriate areas for City-initiated MH Middle Housing zoning. Staff presented those areas to the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council in March 2023 and both bodies recommended moving forward with all recommended areas, but not two optional areas. Staff throughout the Long Range Planning, Development Review, and GIS divisions, along with review staff in Transportation & Mobility and other departments within the City, have worked to map the areas, prep and host public input opportunities, and analyze the recommended areas to address infrastructure constraints. Staff hosted three public input meetings in June 2023 (two virtual and one in-person) to gain resident input, as well as developed an interactive website for public input, and have fielded questions and comments via the website, email, and phone inquiries. In total, there are 33 areas for potential rezoning cases, with 26 areas in the Current Phase during summer 2023 and 7 areas in a future phase or phases due to surveying work being needed in those areas. The Current Phase rezoning cases will begin being scheduled for Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council public hearings beginning in fall 2023. 19 Update City Bicycle Map Update the City's bicycle map to incorporate recent changes in facilities, as well as to enhance usability. On Track 06/01/2023 09/30/2023 07/13/2023 Coordination has occurred with GIS and Public Communications. Anticipate map being finalized in late August. 20 Unified Development Ordinance Amendment -Clean-Up and Consistency Clean-up items relating to the Unified Development Ordinance.On Track 04/01/2023 08/31/2023 07/08/2023 This ordinance amendment provides needed updates to the Unified Development Ordinance for consistency, readability, and accuracy. These edits are not for policy changes, but rather clean-up items. This item is scheduled for the July 20 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and the August 10 City Council meeting. 21 Dashboard - Demographics Creation of a dashboard for demographic statistics using ArcGIS Hub.On Track 04/01/2023 09/30/2023 07/25/2023 The demographics dashboard has been created and refined as of summer 2023. Staff are now working to house the dashboard on the Planning & Development Services website as a temporary digital location before a larger dashboard hub is created by IT in FY24. 22 Dashboard - Permits Creation of a dashboard for permit statistics using ArcGIS Hub to replace the development newsletter. On Track 04/01/2023 09/30/2023 07/25/2023 The permits dashboard has been created and refined as of summer 2023. Staff are now working to house the dashboard on the Planning & Development Services website as a temporary digital location before a larger dashboard hub is created by IT in FY24. 23 Strategic Plan for Customer ServiceEnhancements Creation of a strategic plan to identify actions to improve customer service from the department. On Track 05/01/2023 09/30/2024 08/01/2023 Representatives of each division have volunteered/appointed to the working group and we had an initial meeting on 7/10 to discuss the purpose of the action plan, how it integrates with the P&DS Strategic Plan, and to determine which staff is needed in which follow up meetings addressing specific actions. Follow up appointments have been scheduled for August to identify specifics to carry out actions. Page 125 of 128 MultiPlan View Report 2023-08-07 - 03:06:01PM CDT 3 of 3 #Name Description Status Start Date Due Date Last Updated Last Comment 24 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master PlanAudit This audit will evaluate the implementation and status of actions contained in the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan that was originally adopted in 2010 and had a significant update in 2018. On Track 06/12/2023 09/30/2023 08/07/2023 Verifying status of action items in Chapter 7 - Implementation (specifically Figures 7.1: Facility Miles and 7.4: Implementation Tasks) to create a summary report of overall plan progress and recommendations for next steps. Anticipated to be complete by the end of August 2023. Page 126 of 128 MultiPlan View Report 2023-09-01 - 10:18:00AM CDT 1 of 1 Name Description ArcGIS Hub Page Creation of a ArcGIS Hub page to host all GIS mapping information. This project will be completed in tandem with the PDS GIS division and IT GIS. Bicycle Friendly Community DesignationApplication Submit application for Bike Friendly Community designation with intention becoming a silver level designation. Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan Implementation Implementation of actions identified within the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. An audit of the plan will be finished in fall 2023 which includes a review of actions completed. Prioritization of remaining actions will be undertaken and implemented. Complete Streets Plan for Core of College Station Development of plan to improve safety, connectivity, accessibility, and comfort of active transportation and transit users in the core of the City. Project is pending funding for consultant through TxDOT Transportation Alternatives grant program to be announced in October 2023. If grant is not awarded, a smaller effort will be performed by staff. Cost of Service Study Review the cost of service for all activities within the department to determine actual cost for administering those services. Dashboard - Bicycle and Pedestrian Creation of a dashboard for bicycle and pedestrian metrics using ArcGIS Hub. Digitize Historical Records Digitize all historical paper records. Establish Stakeholder Conversation Series Work with development community to establish a series of communications on various issues. This includes builders, developers, realtors, etc. Floodplain Hazard Assessment Assess the current floodplain hazards and assist in determining scale of any necessary mapping/remapping efforts. As part of the project, several of the City’s watersheds will be evaluated including Hopes and Peach Creeks where we have seen rapid growth in these mostly unstudied and unmapped watersheds and streams. International Building Codes (2024) Update Review and adoption of 2024 code cycle building codes. National Electrical Code (2023) Update Review and adopt the National Electrical Code 2023 edition and make needed amendments. Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan Implementation Implementation of actions identified within the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan. The plan is slated for adoption in late September 2023. The actions to be implemented first will be identified after plan adoption, but are likely to include revisions to the Mixed-Use zoning district, among others. Ordinance Amendment - Curbside ManagementPolicy Ordinance amendment to create curbside management policy for ride-share services, transit, deliveries, curbside pick-ups, and food trucks and establishing designated aerial fire access locations. Ordinance Amendment - Flood for BCS DrainageDesign Guideline Update Amend Flood Ordinance to incorporate any revisions that arise from the BCS Drainage Design Guideline Update Ordinance Amendment - Flood for Community Rating System Requirements Amend Flood Ordinance to clarify applicability to replacement of manufactured homes in existing manufactured home developments. Ordinance Amendment - Safe Passing Evaluation and creation of a safe passing ordinance. Pedestrian Facility Design Complete Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) or schematic design for a high priority unfunded sidewalk and/or shared use path. Shared Use Path Design Standards Develop design guidelines for shared use paths to be incorporated into the BCS Unified Design Guidelines with UDO amendments as needed. Also includes design considerations for when paths cross at street intersections and at midblock locations. Small Area Plan Audit Phase 2 This audit will evaluate the implementation effectiveness of the older small area plans that have been adopted under the City's Comprehensive Plan. These small area plans include the Northgate District redevelopment plans (1996 and 2003), Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan (1998), and the Medical District Master Plan (2012). Strategic Plan for Customer ServiceImplementation Implementation of actions identified within the FY24 Customer Service Action Plan. The plan will be completed by 9/30/2023 and implementation will begin after that date. Tactical Urbanism Evaluate and develop tactical urbanism program. Transportation Existing Conditions and DataCollection Update GIS layers to include more detail and attributes of existing street pavement widths, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, and right-of-way. Also create a database of transportation-related volumes and other available data. Unfunded Bicycle and Pedestrian ProjectPrioritization Work with Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board to update the metrics used to prioritize stand-alone unfunded bicycle and pedestrian-related infrastructure projects as identified in adopted City plans. Once the methodology is updated, perform the project prioritization to identify the higher priority projects to seek implementation from City and other funding sources. Unified Development Ordinance Amendment -Accessory Dwelling Units Amendments to the accessory dwelling unit section to address current concerns relating to attached units, and other changes to its standards. Unified Development Ordinance Amendment - Drive-Thru Queueing Amend the Unified Development Ordinance to update the requirements for drive-thru uses to reflect changes in demand and pick-up delivery methods. Unified Development Ordinance Amendment -Mixed Use Zoning District Revisions to the Mixed-Use zoning district are needed to better implement the Urban Center and Neighborhood Center land use categories. These amendments are anticipated to begin following the adoption of the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan. Unified Development Ordinance Amendment -Planned Development District Amendments to the planned development district to set certain standards for its use and applicability. Unified Development Ordinance Amendment - Townhouse Parking Ordinance amendment to revise off-street parking and related requirements associated with Townhouse uses so that they are consistent in the various zoning districts in which the use is allowed and alleviate issues with continuous driveways along streets and obstruction to sidewalks. Unified Development Ordinance Amendment -Traffic Impact Analysis Ordinance amendment to update traffic impact analysis requirements that consider changes drafted by the MPO and other modifications such as applicability thresholds, varying scopes, safety implications, bicycle and pedestrian users, and site-related elements. Walkability and Bikeability Audit Program Establish a program for walkability and bikeability audits. Wellborn District Plan Implementation Implementation of actions identified within the Wellborn District Plan. The plan is slated for adoption in October 2023 and the actions to be implemented first will be identified after plan adoption. Page 127 of 128 September 7, 2023 Item No. 6.2. MH Middle Housing Rezoning Requests Sponsor: Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Presentation and discussion on MH Middle Housing rezoning requests. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Recommendation(s): Summary: As requested by the Commission, staff will provide an update regarding MH Middle Housing rezoning requests. Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: None Page 128 of 128