Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/16/2022 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionCollege Station, TX Meeting Agenda Planning and Zoning Commission 1101 Texas Ave, College Station, TX 77840 Internet: https://zoom.us/j/85645713093 Phone: 888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 856 4571 3093 The City Council may or may not attend this meeting. June 16, 2022 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers College Station, TX Page 1 Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a thirdparty vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting access and participation will be in-person only. 1.Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. 2.Hear Visitors At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. An individual who wishes to address the Commission regarding any item on the agenda shall register with the Commission Secretary prior to 4 p.m. on the day of the meeting. To register, the individual must provide a name and phone number by calling 979.764.3751 or emailing khejny@cstx.gov prior to 4 p.m. To submit written comments to the Commission, email khejny@cstx.gov and they will be distributed to the Commission. The visitor presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) 3.Consent Agenda All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 3.1.Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. Attachments:1.June 2 2022 3.2.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Winding Creek Estates Phase 5 on approximately 33.86 acres, generally located west of the existing Saddle Creek Subdivision in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case #FP2021-000019 Sponsors:Derrick Williams Attachments:1.Staff Report 2.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map Page 1 of 60 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 June 16, 2022 3.Final Plat 4.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 5.Regular Agenda 5.1.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MF Multi-Family to D Duplex for approximately 0.56 acres located at 301 and 303 Cooner Street, generally located at the intersection of Cooner Street and Eisenhower Street. Case #REZ2022-000007 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the July 14, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Sponsors:Robin Macias Attachments:1.Staff Report 2.Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3.Rezoning Exhibit 4.Background Information 5.Applicant's Supporting Information 6.Existing Future Land Use Map7.Rezoning Map 5.2.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from R&D Research and Development to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 6.742 acres of land located at 400 Technology Parkway. Case #REZ2022- 000008 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the July 14, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors:Anthony Armstrong Attachments:1.Staff Report 2.Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3.Background Information 4.Applicant's Supporting Information 5.Rezoning Map 6.Existing Future Land Use Map7.Exhibit B - Modifications and Benefits 8.Concept Plan 5.3.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a waiver request to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.3.E.9.a, 'Existing Substandard Street Right-of-Way' and presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Preliminary Plan for McDonald’s Station Addition Subdivision on approximately two acres of land, generally located at the corner of Holleman Drive and Wellborn Road. Case #PP2021-000010 Sponsors:Jesse Dimeolo Attachments:1.Staff Report 2.Waiver Request Page 2 of 60 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 June 16, 2022 3.Applicant's Supporting Information 4.Waiver Exhibit 5.Vicinity Map and Aerial6.Preliminary Plan 5.4.Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the Plan of Work. Sponsors:Michael Ostrowski Attachments:1.Cover Sheet 2.PDS Plan of Work 6.Informational Agenda 6.1.Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev 6.2.Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: Thursday, June 23, 2022 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison - Wright) Thursday, July 7, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. Thursday, July 14, 2022 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison - McIlhaney) Thursday, July 21, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. 6.3.Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: A Rezoning of approximately five acres from PDD to PDD located at 404 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 5, 2022 and voted (6-1) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on May 26, 2022 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. A Rezoning of approximately nine acres from PDD to PDD located at 1898 Arnold Road. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 5, 2022 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on May 26, 2022 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. A Rezoning of approximately one acre from C3 to GC located at 4180 State Highway 6 South. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 19, 2022 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on June 9, 2022 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. An Ordinance Amendment regarding the powers, duties, and processes of the Zoning Board of Adjustment. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 19, 2022 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on June 9, 2022 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. 6.4.Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board. None 7.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. Page 3 of 60 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 June 16, 2022 A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 8.Adjourn. The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on June 10, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 4 of 60 June 2, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 5 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION June 2, 2022 6:00 p.m. Phone: *888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 841 4920 9658 Internet: https://zoom.us/j/84149209658 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Dennis Christiansen, Bobby Mirza, William Wright, Thomas Jackson, and Melissa McIlhaney (virtually) COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jason Cornelius and Mark Smith COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Linda Harvell CITY STAFF PRESENT: Michael Ostrowski, Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, Erika Bridges, Jason Schubert, Anthony Armstrong, Lucas Harper, Jesse DiMeolo, Derrick Williams, Bekha Wells, Naomi Sing, Katherine Beaman-Jamael, Matthew Ellis, Gillian Sitler, Lindsey Pressler, Carla Robinson, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. Chairperson Christiansen called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. 2. Hear Visitors No visitors spoke. 3. Consent Agenda 3.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. • May 19, 2022 Commissioner Wright motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Mirza seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed. 5. Regular Agenda Discussion and public hearing for Agenda Items #5.1 and #5.2 were held until after Agenda Item #5.2 was presented. 5.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map from Suburban Residential to Neighborhood Commercial for approximately 5 acres of land, located at 2354 Barron Road. Case Page 5 of 60 June 2, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 5 #CPA2021-000005 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 23, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change.) 5.2 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 5 acres of land located at 2354 Barron Road. Case #REZ2022-000003 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 23, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Staff Planner Williams presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning to the Commission, recommending approval. Chairperson Christiansen asked for staff’s consideration to noise, safety, and traffic affecting adjacent residential areas. Staff Planner Williams stated that a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) did not show any traffic mitigation needed. Mr. Williams also specified that there is a City noise ordinance and buffer requirements for this development. Applicant, Crissy Hartl, Mitchell & Morgan Engineers, presented to the Commission. Commissioner Mirza asked if the concept plan adequately addresses parking and detention. Ms. Hartl stated that the detention pond is sized to accommodate drainage for the property. Ms. Hartl also stated that there will be enough parking, and no modifications are requested at this time. Chairperson Christiansen asked if the lighting from the development would be kept on site. Ms. Hartl stated that the City has ordinances in effect to control lighting, but the lighting will not penetrate the property line. Developer, Mike Arlidge, was available to speak to lighting on the property. Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski spoke specifically to Suburban Commercial district lighting stating that lighting is restricted in the buffer yard and cannot be above the eave height. Traffic Engineer, Tony Voigt, was available to speak on the traffic study for the development, stating that no mitigation requirements were required, and the analysis showed very favorable results. Chairperson Christiansen opened the public hearing. Terry Rand, Westfield Village, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning citing concerns for vacant lease space, traffic, and no interest by the community. Page 6 of 60 June 2, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 5 Billy Hart, Westfield Village, spoke in opposition the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning citing concerns for increased traffic, pedestrian traffic, vacant lease space, and lighting. Bradley Baumann, Westfield Village, spoke in opposition the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning citing concerns for building occupancy, lighting, and vacant lease spaces. Michelle Kyllenon, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning citing concerns for trash trucks. Chairperson Christiansen closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mirza shared concerns for traffic congestion, pedestrian traffic, and neighborhood character. Commissioner Jackson asked for clarification on the nearby commercial property. Mr. Williams stated that the property is currently a health care clinic. Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski stated that the property the clinic is on has the same base zoning being requested for this property. Commissioner Wright asked for uses allowed in a Neighborhood Commercial land use. Mr. Williams clarified that a Neighborhood Commercial land use includes commercial activities that cater to nearby residents. Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski clarified that this use will include less intense offices and retail establishments include height protection and different architectural features. Commissioner McIlhaney asked for the specific permitted uses for this land use. Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski read the list of permitted uses within the Suburban Commercial zoning district. Commissioner Jackson motioned to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Chairperson Christiansen seconded the motion. Commissioner Jackson stated that this is a good location for commercial uses. Chairperson Christiansen stated that this is an intersection supported by commercial uses and may not be incompatible to adjacent neighborhoods. The motion passed (4-1) with Commissioner Wright voting in opposition. Commissioner Wright motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning and Concept Plan with the condition of a maximum building height of 28 feet facing Victoria Avenue (northeast) Page 7 of 60 June 2, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5 and a maximum building height of 16 feet facing Renee Lane (southwest). Commissioner Mirza seconded the motion. There was general discussion regarding the building height amongst the Commission and the Developer. The motion passed (5-0). 5.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding waiver requests to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.3.G, ‘Blocks’ and Section 8.3.E.3.a ‘Street Projections’ and presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Preliminary Plan for Brewster Pointe Subdivision II on approximately 88 acres, generally located at the corner of W.S. Phillips Parkway and Brewster Drive. Case #PP2021-000012 Staff Planner DiMeolo presented this item to the Commission, recommending approval. Chairperson Christiansen asked why the road cannot be extended. Staff Planner DiMeolo stated that the impact on the flood-prone area is more minimal with a sidewalk. Applicant, Deven Doyen, Schultz Engineering, clarified that the pond discharges toward the north and several creeks come in from the north, the area is the main drainage way for the property. Mr. Doyen further clarified that a street would need a considerable drainage structure and would make the development of the adjacent property difficult. Commissioner Jacksion asked for clarification on the map. Mr. Doyen stated that the map shows the approximate outline of 100-year water surface elevation, which is not on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) map. Commissioner Wright motioned to approve the waiver requests and Preliminary Plan as presented. Commissioner McIlhaney seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 6. Informational Agenda 6.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. 6.2 Discussion of Minor / Amending Plats approved by staff: • Heidtke Subdivision: Block 1, Lots 1 & 2 ~ Case #FP2021-000027 6.3 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, June 9, 2022 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison – Cornelius) Page 8 of 60 June 2, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5 • Thursday, June 16, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, June 23, 2022 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison – Wright) • Thursday, July 7, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. There was no discussion. 6.4 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board. • None There was no discussion. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion. 8. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 7:16 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Dennis Christiansen, Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services Page 9 of 60 Planning & Zoning Commission June 16, 2022 Scale 17 lots on approximately 33.86 acres Location Generally located west of the existing Saddle Creek Subdivision in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Property Owner Wellborn Winding Creek LLC Applicant Shultz Engineering, LLC Project Manager Derrick Williams, Staff Planner dwilliams@cstx.gov Project Overview The proposed subdivision is located within the City of College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction as part of the Winding Creek Estates Preliminary Plan consisting of 87 lots and 2 common areas on approximately 143 acres. The proposed final plat is a part of six planned phases within the Winding Creek Subdivision. Preliminary Plan Original preliminary plan approved in 2017 with a revision in 2018 Parkland Dedication $625 per single-family dwelling unit will be required at the time of Final Plat Traffic Impact Analysis Not required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance N/A Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2.Final Plat Final Plat of Winding Creek Estates Phase 5 Including a Replat of Winding Creek Estates Phase 2 Block 6, Common Area 1 FP2021-000019 Page 10 of 60 Page 11 of 60 Page 12 of 60 Page 13 of 60 LOT 29 LOT 31 LOT 54 LOT 55 LOT 56 LOT 57 LOT 58 LOT 59 LOT 30 LOT 64 STORMWATERDETENTIONPOND 1.479 AC. 2.535AC. 1.003 AC. 1.003 AC. 1.003 AC. 1.008 AC. 1.027 AC. 2.338 AC. BLOCK 5 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 6 1.655 AC. 1.654AC. LOT 37 LOT 38 LOT 78 LOT 79 LOT 39 LOT 40 LOT 41 COMMONAREA 1 COMMONAREA 2 1.758 AC. 1.495 AC. 1.151 AC. 1.015 AC. 1.328 AC. 1.275 AC. 1.891AC. 1.286AC. FF=259.0 FF=262.0 FF=259.0 FF=259.0 FF=260.0 FF=260.0 FF=262.0 FF=259.0 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 LOT 28 LOT 27 LOT 23 LOT 24 LOT 25 1.398 AC. 1.191 AC. 1.293 AC. 1.089 AC. 1.241AC. FF=263.0 FF=266.0 FF=269.0 FF=269.0 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 RAIN MEADOW DR IVERAIN MEADOW DRIVEBunkhouseDriveSILENT BROOK COURTR O L L I N G M E A D OW D R I V E BENDING BRANCH DRIVEBENDING BRANCH DRIVE LEGEND OAKS COURT SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISIONPHASE 7B LOT 81A LOT 81B LOT 99 LOTS 100 LOT 80 BLOCK 8BLOCK 2LOT 82 LOT 87LOTS 86 BLOCK 2 SADDLE CREEKSUBDIVISION PHASE 7A BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 LEGEND LEGEND VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE WE L L B O R N R D SA D D L E C R E E K R DSTOUSLAND RDSA D D L E C R E E K R DSTOUSLAND RDCLAYPIT RDRAIN MEDOW DRROLLING MEDOW DRORIGINAL PLAT Vol. 16299, PG. 53 SHEET 1 OF 2 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE J. C. STUTEVILLE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 216, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAIDTRACT BEING A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 31.915 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO WELLBORN WINDING CREEK, LLC RECORDED IN VOLUME 14161, PAGE 110 OF THEOFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 50.00 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO WELLBORN WINDING CREEK, LLCRECORDED IN VOLUME 14429, PAGE 39 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 10.65 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1 BY A DEED TOWELLBORN WINDING CREEK. LLC, RECORDED IN VOLUME 14484, PAGE 126 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 50.10ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED AS TRACT 2 BY SAID LAST DEED TO WELLBORN WINDING CREEK LLC (14484/126), A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 1.253 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY ADEED TO WELLBORN WINDING CREEK, LLC RECORDED IN VOLUME 14977, PAGE 78 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED6.357 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO BLAKE CREEK INVESTMENTS, LLC RECORDED IN VOLUME 11997, PAGE 1 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, ANDALL OF COMMON AREA 1, WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16299, PAGE 53 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A COTTON SPINDLE FOUND IN AN OLD BRIDGE ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISION, PHASE 7B, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10229,PAGE 235 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAME BEING THE NORTHEAST LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 6.357 ACRE TRACT, MARKING THE NORTH CORNER OF ACALLED 14.787 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO AMISTAD HOLDINGS, LLC RECORDED IN VOLUME 15604, PAGE 144 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. COORDINATES AND BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREIN ARE NAD83 (TEXAS STATE PLANE CENTRAL ZONE GRID NORTH) BASE ON THE PUBLISHED COORDINATES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION GEODETIC CONTROL STATION 14RQU5945778027 MON 4 (N:10171032.038, E:3567536.952) AND AS ESTABLISHED BY GPS OBSERVATION. DISTANCES SHOWN HEREIN ARE GRID DISTANCES. TODETERMINE SURFACE DISTANCES MULTIPLY BY A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00007471045057 (CALCULATED USING GEOID12B); THENCE: ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 6.357 ACRE TRACT, SAID REMAINDER OF 1.253 ACRE TRACT, SAID REMAINDER OF 50.00 ACRE TRACT, SAID REMAINDER OF 31.915ACRE TRACT AND SAID 14.787 ACRE TRACT AND GENERALLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF AN EXISTING CREEK FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS: S 49° 19' 01" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 120.16 FEET; S 31° 53' 20" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.04 FEET; S 04° 57' 25" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 15.69 FEET; S 22° 19' 25" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.17 FEET; S 61° 50' 02" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 53.14 FEET; S 02° 53' 52" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.43 FEET; S 65° 59' 55" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.69 FEET; N 75° 41' 51" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 45.81 FEET; S 14° 22' 38" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 43.26 FEET; S 35° 55' 06" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.29 FEET; S 23° 38' 01" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.92 FEET; S 40° 01' 35" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.70 FEET; S 60° 39' 15" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.51 FEET; S 63° 31' 22" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.57 FEET; S 63° 25' 09" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 44.25 FEET; N 83° 55' 58" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.91 FEET; N 67° 42' 19" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.69 FEET; S 08° 29' 42" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 44.74 FEET; S 51° 14' 11" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.19 FEET; S 38° 16' 41" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 8.78 FEET; S 70° 07' 05" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.53 FEET; N 25° 32' 56" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.61 FEET; N 22° 14' 59" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 9.00 FEET; N 87° 06' 38" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 43.38 FEET; S 56° 32' 30" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.31 FEET; S 18° 22' 25" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.54 FEET; S 27° 32' 42" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 89.28 FEET; S 65° 57' 52" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.24 FEET; S 87° 25' 39" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.42 FEET; S 18° 20' 21" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.84 FEET; S 17° 49' 05" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 58.78 FEET; S 37° 56' 59" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.72 FEET; S 79° 55' 10" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.84 FEET; S 60° 44' 56" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 68.79 FEET; S 27° 35' 02" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.15 FEET; S 47° 57' 24" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.84 FEET; N 80° 56' 04" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 43.69 FEET; N 60° 41' 00" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.24 FEET; S 71° 11' 52" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.57 FEET; S 56° 02' 53" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.40 FEET; S 18° 58' 14" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.66 FEET; S 21° 28' 25" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 44.13 FEET; S 72° 22' 11" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 46.97 FEET; S 78° 35' 47" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 67.01 FEET; S 68° 37' 51" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.86 FEET; S 46° 37' 57" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.53 FEET; S 20° 46' 17" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.16 FEET; S 03° 26' 31" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 122.68 FEET; S 05° 08' 51" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 68.28 FEET; S 19° 25' 29" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.77 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THIS HEREIN TRACT AND THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 797.50FEET; THENCE:THROUGH SAID REMAINDER OF 31.915 ACRE TRACT AND SAID REMAINDER OF 50.00 ACRE TRACT AND ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18° 27' 10" FOR ANARC DISTANCE OF 256.84 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 32° 04' 46" W - 255.73 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID COMMON AREA 1, SAME BEING THE EXTENSION OF THENORTHEAST LINE OF BENDING BRANCH DRIVE (105.00' R.O.W.); THENCE:N 22° 51' 11" W LONG THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID COMMON AREA 1, SAME BEING THE NORTHEAST LINE OF BENDING BRANCH DRIVE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 172.93 FEET TO A ½INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND MARKING THE PLATTED END OF BENDING BRANCH DRIVE; THENCE:S 67° 08' 49" W ACROSS THE PLATTED END OF BENDING BRANCH DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF 105.00 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUNDMARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 37, BLOCK 4, WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 2 (PLAT 16299/53); THENCE:ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 50.00 ACRE TRACT, SAID REMAINDER OF 10.65 ACRE TRACT, SAID REMAINDER OF 50.10 ACRE TRACT AND WINDING CREEKESTATES, PHASE 2, AND WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 3, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16298, PAGE 206 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS,FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS: N 22° 51' 11" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 301.70 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND; S 45° 45' 32" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 294.11 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND; S 28° 41' 26" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 109.20 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND; S 29° 34' 51" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 90.24 FEET; S 08° 19' 57" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 97.07 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND; S 74° 18' 14" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.97 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND; N 60° 42' 38" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 76.61 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND; N 33° 05' 33" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.12 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND; N 25° 10' 40" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 85.42 FEET; N 36° 08' 32" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 107.33 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND; N 53° 09' 11" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 117.19 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND; N 25° 24' 23" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 76.51 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND; N 38° 39' 07" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 181.40 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND MARKING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PHASE 3; THENCE:THROUGH SAID REMAINDER OF 50.10 ACRE TRACT, SAID REMAINDER OF 1.253 ACRE TRACT AND SAID REMAINDER OF 6.357 ACRE TRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS: N 27° 10' 51" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 478.34 FEET; N 58° 27' 21" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 257.31 FEET; N 22° 51' 11" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 320.64 FEET; N 59° 47' 17" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 105.87 FEET; N 19° 38' 49" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.78 FEET; N 62° 08' 49" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 273.31 FEET; S 72° 13' 36" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.74 FEET; N 63° 23' 58" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET; N 26° 36' 02" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 79.19 FEET; N 63° 23' 58" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 256.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 6.357 ACRE TRACT AND SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISION,PHASE 7A, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 8758, PAGE 126 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR REFERENCECOLLEGE STATION GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENT 4 BEARS: N 28° 54' 08" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 4649.55 FEET; THENCE:S 29° 19' 23" E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 6.357 ACRE TRACT AND SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISION, PHASE 7A AND SAID PHASE 7B FOR A DISTANCE OF 777.24FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 33.863 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, AS SURVEYED ON THE GROUND. TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.College Station, Texas 77840 (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER:SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SCALE 1'' = 100'JULY 2021 OWNER/DEVELOPER: WELLBORN WINDINGCREEK, LLC 3000 Briarcrest Drive, Suite 302 Bryan, TX 77802 (281) 642-4924 FINAL PLAT WINDING CREEK ESTATES PHASE 5 33.863 ACRES BLOCK 4, LOTS 32-36 BLOCK 6, LOTS 65-71 BLOCK 7, LOTS 83-87 INCLUDING AREPLAT OF COMMOM AREA 1, BLOCK 6 WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 2 VOL. 16299, PG. 53 25.343 AC, J.C. STUTEVILLE SURVEY, A-216 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 17 LOTS Page 14 of 60 LOT 29 LOT 31 LOT 54 LOT 55 LOT 56 LOT 57 LOT 58 LOT 59 LOT 30 LOT 64 STORMWATERDETENTIONPOND 1.479 AC. 2.535AC. 1.003 AC. 1.003 AC. 1.003 AC. 1.008 AC. 1.027 AC. 2.338 AC. BLOCK 5 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 6 1.655 AC. 1.654AC. LOT 37 LOT 38 LOT 78 LOT 79 LOT 39 LOT 40 LOT 41 COMMONAREA 2 1.758 AC. 1.495 AC. 1.151 AC. 1.015 AC. 1.328 AC. 1.275 AC. 1.286AC. FF=259.0 FF=262.0 FF=259.0 FF=259.0 FF=260.0 FF=260.0 FF=259.0 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 LOT 28 LOT 27 LOT 23 LOT 24 LOT 25 1.398 AC. 1.191 AC. 1.293 AC. 1.089 AC. 1.241AC. FF=263.0 FF=266.0 FF=269.0 FF=269.0 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 7 BLOCK 7 BLOCK 6 BLOCK 4 RAIN MEADOW DR IVERAIN MEADOW DRIVEBunkhouseDriveSILENT BROOK COURTR O L L I N G M E A D OW D R I V E BENDING BRANCH DRIVEBENDING BRANCH DRIVE LEGEND OAKS COURT 2.676 AC. COMMONAREA 2 SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISIONPHASE 7B LOT 81A LOT 81B LOT 99 LOTS 100 LOT 80 BLOCK 8BLOCK 2LOT 82 LOT 87LOTS 86 BLOCK 2 SADDLE CREEKSUBDIVISION PHASE 7A BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 BENDING BRANCH DRIVE BENDING BRANCH DRIVE LEGEND OAKS COURT L EG END OA K S C OU R T L EG END O AK S C OU R T BLOCK 6 LOT 831.181 AC. LOT 841.094 AC. LOT 851.150 AC.LOT 861.118 AC. LOT 351.788 AC. LOT 671.178 AC. LOT 342.039 AC. LOT 681.205 AC. LOT 332.050 AC. LOT 691.685 AC. LOT 321.554 AC. LOT 703.503 AC. LOT 871.088 AC. LOT 714.479 AC. LOT 651.085 AC. LOT 361.066 AC. LOT 661.083 AC. FF=260.0 FF=262.0 BENDING BRANCH DRIVE LOT 714.479 AC. BENDING BRANCH DRIVE LEGEND OAKS COURT L EG END OAK S C OU R T INSET "A" 1"=20' LEGEND VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE WE L L B O R N R D SA D D L E C R E E K R DSTOUSLAND RDSA D D L E C R E E K R DSTOUSLAND RDCLAYPIT RDRAIN MEDOW DRROLLING MEDOW DRREPLAT TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.College Station, Texas 77840 (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER:SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SCALE 1'' = 100'JULY 2021 OWNER/DEVELOPER: WELLBORN WINDINGCREEK, LLC 3000 Briarcrest Drive, Suite 302 Bryan, TX 77802 (281) 642-4924 SHEET 2 OF 2 FINAL PLAT WINDING CREEK ESTATES PHASE 5 33.863 ACRES BLOCK 4, LOTS 32-36 BLOCK 6, LOTS 65-71 BLOCK 7, LOTS 83-87 INCLUDING AREPLAT OF COMMOM AREA 1, BLOCK 6 WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 2 VOL. 16299, PG. 53 25.343 AC, J.C. STUTEVILLE SURVEY, A-216 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 17 LOTS INSET "D" 1"=20' INSET "C" 1"=20' INSET "B" 1"=20' Page 15 of 60 June 16, 2022 Regular Agenda Rezoning – 301 and 303 Cooner Street To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Robin Macias, Staff Planner Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A , “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MF Multi-Family to D Duplex for approximately 0.56 acres located at 301 and 303 Cooner Street, generally located at the intersection of Cooner Street and Einsenhower Street. Case # REZ2022-000007 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the July 14, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 0.56 acres of land generally located at 301 and 303 Cooner Street from MF Multi-Family to D Duplex. It is the applicant’s intent to build duplex buildings on the two individual lots. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject tract is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Mixed Residential. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the following: Areas that are appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including, townhomes, duplexes, small multi-family buildings (3-12 unit), and limited small-lot single family. These areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi-family residential or mixed-use development and suburban residential or neighborhood conservation areas. The intent of the district is to: Accommodate a walkable pattern of small lots, small blocks, and well-connect street pattern. Support neighborhoods with a mix of housing types and where larger or more dense housing is located near community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within this land use include: Duplex, townhouse, and limited scale single-family. The subject property is also located within the Texas and University redevelopment area as designated on the Planning Areas Map as well as the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. This area includes a number of underperforming land uses that, due to their proximity to two of the busiest corridors in the City, are poised for redevelopment. This area is Page 16 of 60 consistently ranked as a high priority area for future planning efforts by residents and City leadership. The subject property is located along the edge of the redevelopment area and is adjacent to single-family homes within the City of Bryan. The proposed zoning allows for duplex properties to be built which is in line with the Comprehensive Plan as it provides a transition from the nearby single-family homes and the Commercial development along University Drive. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The subject property is surrounded by single-family homes in the City of Bryan to the north, and duplexes and small multi-family buildings to the east, south and west. The proposed zoning district is appropriate for the surrounding area as it would allow for the same type of development as the surrounding properties. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The size and location of the subject property is suitable for duplex development. The site has adequate space to meet the minimal dimensional standards for the D Duplex zoning district. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of this development. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject property fronts Cooner Street. Cooner Street is a local street which allows each lot to have direct access. No TIA was performed for this rezoning request as a TIA was not required due to the proposed use is expected to generate less than 150 trips in any peak hour. 5. The marketability of the property: The uses allowed by the current zoning district of MF Multi-Family is marketable for this area. The applicant states that the proposed uses allowed in the D Duplex zoning district are equally as marketable due to its proximity to Texas A&M University. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this rezoning request as it is in line with the Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the surrounding area. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Background Information 4. Applicant’s Supporting Information 5. Existing Future Land Use Map 6. Rezoning Map Page 17 of 60 Page 18 of 60 Page 19 of 60 Page 20 of 60 COONER STREETEISENHOWER STREETNIMITZ STREET 1 2CITY OF BRYANCOONER, BLOCK 1, LOT 13, Acres: 0.28ANDCOONER, BLOCK 1, LOT 14, Acres: 0.27Existing Zoning: MF MULTI-FAMILYCO O N E R S T R E E TEISENHOWER STREETNIMITZ STREET 1 2CI T Y O F B R Y A NCOONER, BLOCK 1, LOT 13, Acres: 0.28ANDCOONER, BLOCK 1, LOT 14, Acres: 0.27Proposed Zoning: D DUPLEXTEXAS AVEUNIVERSITY DRIVECITY LIMITSCITY OF BRYANSITEEXISTINGPROPOSED LEGEND VICINITY MAPRZPage 21 of 60 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 16, 2022 Advertised Council Hearing Date: July 14, 2022 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Property owner notices mailed: 21 Contacts in support: None at the time of this report Contacts in opposition:None at the time of this report Inquiry contacts:None at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North City of Bryan City of Bryan Single family Residential South Urban Center R- 4 Multi-family Residential East Mixed Residential MF Multi-family Residential West Mixed Residential R-4 Multi-family Residential DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexed: April 1951 Zoning: R-1 Single Family Residential (1951) R-4 Multi-family (1978) MF Multi-family (2016) Final Plat:Cooner Addition Block 1 Lots 13 & 14 Site Development:single-family home and duplex Page 22 of 60 Name of Project:301 & 303 COONER STREET REZONING Address:301 COONER ST Legal Description:COONER, BLOCK 1, LOT 13 Total Acreage:0.56 Applicant:: Property Owner:GUMA INC MITCHELL & MORGAN List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. As the student population at Texas A&M University continues to grow, the need for housing close to the University becomes more important. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes this need and includes a new land use designation ideal for infill redevelopment that will accommodate a variety of moderate density residential land uses. These properties are ideal for redevelopment and this rezoning to allow duplexes will further implement the Plan. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. The Comprehensive Plan indicates these properties are designated for Mixed Residential uses. Mixed residential is intended for a mix of medium density uses. There is a variety of housing types along Cooner Street and in the vicinity. Duplexes will further support the mix of housing types and is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. These properties are also located within a Redevelopment area on the Comprehensive Plan. Redeveloping these properties will enhance the character and value of the neighborhood. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? Multi-family development is also suitable for the property and would be more appropriate if there was an opportunity to consolidate additional property. With only these three properties available for redevelopment, duplexes are more suitable for these lots. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. Duplexes contribute to the desired mix of densities and housing types specified in the Mixed Residential land use designation making this development very suitable for the property. Duplexes are especially suitable due to the proximity to Texas A&M University. REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 Page 23 of 60 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Duplexes contribute to the desired mix of densities and housing types specified in the Mixed Residential land use designation making this development very suitable for the property. Duplexes are especially suitable due to the proximity to Texas A&M University. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Multi-family uses as permitted by the existing zoning district are marketable on this property, similar to how other surrounding properties have developed. These properties are close in proximity to Texas A&M University and will serve the student population. Duplexes are equally as appropriate and marketable for these lots and will serve the same purpose. List any other reasons to support this zone change. N/A Page 2 of 2 Page 24 of 60 Page 25 of 60 Page 26 of 60 June 16, 2022 Regular Agenda Rezoning – 400 Technology Parkway PDD To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Anthony Armstrong, Land Development Review Administrator Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A , “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from R&D Research and Development to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 6.74 acres located at 400 Technology Parkway, generally located at the end of Technology Parkway east of State Highway 6 South. Case # REZ2022-000008 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the July 14, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request and Concept Plan. Summary: This request is to change the existing zoning from R&D Research and Development to PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning of SC Suburban Commercial and associated Concept Plan on approximately 6.74 acres. The applicant is requesting to add an allowed use to the property of “consumer, small-scale aerial distribution”, while at the same time removing drive through/windows and fuel sales from the allowed uses. The applicant provided additional limitations to vehicle trips and the outdoor operation area as well as several landscape buffers as can be seen on the attached Concept Plan. The base zoning proposal of SC Suburban Commercial is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the subject as Neighborhood Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan generally describes the Neighborhood Commercial land use designation as follows: Neighborhood Commercial – Areas of commercial activities that cater primarily to nearby residents. These areas tend to be smaller format than General Commercial and located adjacent to major roads along the fringe of residential areas. Design of these structures is compatible in size, architecture, and lot coverage with surrounding residential uses. The proposed use of the property is defined as “consumer, small-scale aerial distribution”; which means the use of drones or similar devices weighing less than 100 pounds on takeoff, including everything that is on board or otherwise attached to the drone, to enable the receipt, storage, and distribution of packages by air. Distribution of consumer packages by land must be limited to 5 trips per day. The small-scale limitation of the use keeps the proposed use in compliance with the intent of Neighborhood Commercial’s smaller format, and service is intended to directly serve homeowners and residents within the surrounding neighborhoods. Page 27 of 60 The property does not have direct access to State Highway 6, but it is within 500 feet of the future 2 Lane Minor Collector of Pavilion Avenue, lending the area to the smaller format of commercial use as compared to the General Commercial along the highway itself. The proposed lot coverage of the property is also in compatibility with the surrounding residential uses. The closest properties are zoned as GS General Suburban and allowed a lot coverage of 55%, while the proposed concept plan will not exceed 40% of the property being covered. Additionally, the existing buildings on the property will remain in their current footprint. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The property takes its only access from Technology Parkway. The use will have very limited vehicle traffic consisting nearly entirely of employees. The consumer, small-scale aerial distribution use being added operates during daylight, which is compatible with the intention of SC Suburban Commercial uses. Adjacent properties are zoned R&D Research and Development to the east, west, and south. The adjacent R&D properties along the entire south/southeast boundary is a detention and greenbelt area that are not buildable lots and are not part of the rezoning request. This will provide a significant existing vegetative buffer ranging from approximately 250-450 feet. There is a large vacant tract owned by the College Station Independent School District to the north that provides a significant buffer between the subject property and the Foxfire neighborhood to the north. The school district was contacted about the proposed rezoning and use of the property and they did not express any concerns at this time. Every adjacent property to the proposed and existing development is undeveloped land. The property is accessed through GC General Commercial-zoned properties currently developed as auto-dealerships, lending this tucked away location to be a less intense commercial use. The PDD’s land uses are appropriate in the context of the area. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The size and location of the subject property is suitable for the proposed use of the property and any other SC Suburban Commercial land uses. The property has three existing buildings, approximately 8,000 sf, 9,600 sf, and 14,400 sf in size. Drives, access, and parking are all existing and provided for on the property. The only additional improvements to be made on the property are in the area noted “Operating Area” on the attached concept plan, and the additional landscape buffers being provided on the west and east sides of the property. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of the proposed uses. Detention is required as part of development in the City of College Station and the previously mentioned detention area to the southwest has been built to provide detention for this lot. The subject property has frontage and existing access to Technology Parkway, a private street. The City’s Thoroughfare Plan has the Pavilion Avenue extension within close proximately of the property and will eventually give it an additional location off of State Highway 6 to directly access the property. Currently access is still from State Highway 6 via a private access easement from the Page 28 of 60 driveways for the auto-dealerships off of the frontage road or from their driveway and rear access drive off of Sebesta Road. A traffic impact analysis was not required for the proposed request as the anticipated traffic volume falls below the threshold of 150 trips in the peak hour that would require a TIA to be performed. A TIA letter provided estimates of no more than 55 vehicle trips in the PM peak hour per the ITE Manual. 5. The marketability of the property: The proposed modifications to the existing PDD and Concept Plan will increase the marketability of the property by permitting the additional requested use on the property. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the layout of the existing building and drive/parking areas as well as the proposed operation area and buffer areas. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD Concept Plans: 1.The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2.The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3.The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4.Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5.The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6.The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7.The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. Purpose, Intent and Community Benefits: The proposed Planned Development District for this property outlines the purpose, intent, and community benefit of the proposed development, which is to provide consumer, small-scale aerial distribution to serve consumers in the surrounding area and community. The operating area on the property of the drones will be limited to the area identified on the Concept Plan. Additionally, it is worth noting that the proposed use is subject to regulation by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as well. Page 29 of 60 The developer has held multiple neighborhood meetings in order to help share the intent and scope of the project with adjacent neighborhood HOAs in the area. The following HOAs contacts on file with the City were initially contacted directly by the developer and were also mailed notices by the City of the rezoning request: Emerald Forest HOA, Sandstone HOA, Foxfire HOA, Amber Lake HOA, Shadowcrest HOA, Stonebridge HOA, Chadwick HOA, and Woodcreek HOA. Of those HOAs the developer held a meeting with the Shadowcrest HOA. They also held meetings with Emerald Forest, Foxfire, Amber Lake, and Sandstone HOAs in which City staff was in attendance. At these meetings the developer provided a detailed description of the proposed use of consumer, small-scale distribution and answered any questions from the various HOA representatives about the proposed use and discussed concerns. Generally, there were concerns regarding privacy, safety, and noise. The developer addressed these concerns and other questions, and generally the HOA representatives were satisfied with the responses. While the base zoning district of SC Suburban Commercial allows for all uses within that zoning district, the applicant is proposing to remove the use of drive through/windows and fuel sales as permitted uses on the property as they have been stated as potential conflicts with residential uses. The applicant has also proposed additional protection on the existing natural buffer that is on the southwest side of the property which extends into the property upwards of 60 feet. They have also proposed buffering on both the west and east sides of the property to further buffer the operational area. Base Zoning and Meritorious Modifications: The proposed Planned Development District will have a base zoning of SC Suburban Commercial. At the time of site plan, the project will need to meet all applicable site development standards and platting requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance for the base zoning district, except where meritorious modifications are granted with the PDD zoning. The applicant is requesting the following modification of adding the allowed use of “consumer, small-scale aerial distribution” to the permitted uses on the property. Consumer, small-scale aerial distribution is defined as: the use of drones or similar devices weighing less than 100 pounds on takeoff, including everything that is on board or otherwise attached to the drone, to enable the receipt, storage, and distribution of packages by air. Distribution of consumer packages by land must be limited to 5 trips per day. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request and associated Concept Plan. The rezoning request is in consistent with Comprehensive Plan, and the restriction on drive through/windows and fuel sales further restricts uses on the property, helping ensure compatibility with adjacent properties. In addition, the additional landscape buffers being proposed, along with keeping the large vegetative buffer on the south side of the property will further limit any adverse impacts on the adjacent properties. By zoning the property PDD and having the associated Concept Plan, it further illustrates the location and details of the proposed use on the property whereas the current zoning allows for any development of the allowed uses on the property within the Unified Development Ordinance. It should also be noted that some of the uses allowed within the R&D Research and Development zoning district may be more intense than this use or other some of the other uses allowed within the SC Suburban Commercial zoning district. Page 30 of 60 SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Background Information 3. Applicant’s Supporting Information 4. Rezoning Map 5. Existing Future Land Use Map 6. Exhibit B – Modifications and Benefits 7. Concept Plan Page 31 of 60 Page 32 of 60 Page 33 of 60 Page 34 of 60 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 16, 2022 Advertised Council Hearing Date: July 14, 2022 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Emerald Forest HOA, Sandstone HOA, Foxfire HOA, Amber Lake HOA, Shadowcrest HOA, Stonebridge HOA, Chadwick HOA, and Woodcreek HOA Property owner notices mailed: 13 Contacts in support: See staff report regarding neighborhood meetings Contacts in opposition:See staff report regarding neighborhood meetings Inquiry contacts:None at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Suburban Residential R Rural Undeveloped South Natural & Open Areas R&D Research and Development Common Area Greenbelt/Detention East Natural & Open Areas R&D Research and Development Common Area Greenbelt/Detention West Neighborhood Commercial R&D Research and Development Undeveloped DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexed: September 1977 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (1977) R&D Research and Development (1996) Final Plat:Technology Business Park Phase 1, Block 1, Lot 20 Site Development:Texas Digital Systems - Corporate Headquarters (1997) Page 35 of 60 Name of Project: TECHNOLOGY PKWY PDD Address: 400 TECHNOLOGY PKWY Legal Description: TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS PARK PH 1, BLOCK 1, LOT 20 Total Acreage: 6.74 Applicant: JONES & CARTER Property Owner: TXD FINANCIAL LLC List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. Continued city growth and technology development Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. In accordance How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? suitable for technology commercial area. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. property will be utilized for technology driven field. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. property will be utilized for technology driven field. REZONING PDD APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 3 Page 36 of 60 Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. suitable for technology commercial area. List any other reasons to support this zone change. Economic growth and highlight of city of college station. Maximum Building Height. 29' Proposed Drainage. Existing infrastructure Variations Sought. see attached. Community Benefits. See attached. Sustained Stability. yes Page 2 of 3 Page 37 of 60 Conformity. yes Compatibility with use. yes Access to Streets. Private Public Improvements. None Public Health. see attached Safety. see attached Page 3 of 3 Page 38 of 60 Page 39 of 60 Page 40 of 60 Exhibit B Technology Drive Rezoning Narrative: Base zoning of Suburban Commercial Propose the removal of drive through/window uses from permitted uses and fuel sales Add use: “consumer, small-scale aerial distribution”; definition: Means the use of drones or similar devices weighing less than 100 pounds on takeoff, including everything that is on board or otherwise attached to the drone, to enable the receipt, storage, and distribution of packages by air. Distribution of consumer packages by land must be limited to 5 trips per day. The operating area for the drones on the property must be limited to the area identified on the Concept Plan. Add stipulation that peak hour trip generation will be less than 150 trips per peak hour, or a TIA will be required for the site. Community Benefits: Consistent with comprehensive plan (R&D to Suburban Commercial) Removal of permitted uses that may conflict with residential uses when located directly adjacent. Establishment of additional landscaping buffers for the operational area (west side of property) and additional landscape screening to the east side of the facility – as shown on the concept plan. Continued protection of the existing natural buffer between the current facility and the existing development to the south. Page 41 of 60 Page 42 of 60 Planning & Zoning Commission June 16, 2022 Scale Two commercial lots on approximately two acres of land Location Generally located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Holleman Drive and Wellborn Road Applicant Kimley-Horn (Houston) Project Manager Jesse Dimeolo, Staff Planner jdimeolo@cstx.gov Project Overview The preliminary plan proposes two commercial lots at the intersection of a Major Collector (Holleman Drive) and a Major Arterial (Wellborn Road). Private access easements are proposed so that the lots will have shared access. A public access easement will also cover the public sidewalk along Holleman Drive. Wellborn Road is constructed as a 4- lane roadway though is designated as a future 6-lane Major Arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. The applicant is requesting a waiver to the requirements related to existing substandard street right-of-way along Wellborn Road and proposes to plat a right-of-way reserve instead of providing right-of-way dedication. Parkland Dedication Not applicable Traffic Impact Analysis TIA memo submitted with site plan application Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, except for the waiver request related to UDO Section 8.3.E.9.a ‘Existing Substandard Street Right-of-Way.’ Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the waiver but approval of the Preliminary Plan with a condition that the ROW reserve be changed to a ROW dedication. Supporting Materials 1. Waiver Request 2. Applicants Supporting Information 3. Waiver Exhibit 4. Vicinity Map and Aerial 5. Preliminary Plan Preliminary Plan for McDonald’s Station Addition PP2021-000010 Page 43 of 60 Planning & Zoning Commission June 16, 2022 SUBDIVISION WAIVER REQUEST The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) except for the following waiver request: UDO Section 8.3.E.9.a ‘Existing Substandard Street Right-of-Way’ Per the requirements of this section, whenever an existing right-of-way is within or adjacent to a proposed subdivision and such right-of-way width is substandard, the additional width for the street shall be dedicated. For development occurring on only one (1) side of such a roadway, the amount dedicated shall generally equal one-half (½) of the deficiency in width based on the classification and type of street, as measured from the existing centerline of the right-of-way. If the parcel(s) on the opposite side of the right-of-way previously dedicated a portion, the proposed plat shall dedicate the remaining width. If the opposite side of the right-of-way has a permanent constraint such as a railroad right-of-way or conservation easement, the full width of the deficiency may be required. The Administrator may reduce, increase, or eliminate the amount of right-of-way (ROW) dedication based on design considerations, existing land uses, existing development on adjacent properties, and dimensions of the proposed subdivision or plat. The applicant is requesting a waiver to the requirement to dedicate 20 feet of ROW along Wellborn Road (FM 2154). The applicant states this roadway is a TxDOT facility and TxDOT does not have any future, planned projects for this section of roadway. The applicant proposes to provide a 20-foot ROW reserve instead, essentially setting aside the area from any development encroachments if a need does arise to widen the road. The area within the ROW reserve will remain as private property and will need to be purchased for use as ROW in the future. The Thoroughfare Plan designates Wellborn Road as a future 6-lane Major Arterial. It is currently constructed as a 4-lane roadway with a center two-way turn lane. TxDOT is currently rebuilding the intersection of Wellborn Road and Holleman Drive to raise Wellborn Road up to the elevation of the railroad that will remove the significant grade change as part of a railroad safety project. The current project will also provide additional turn lanes on Holleman Drive but does not add lanes to Wellborn Road. TxDOT does not have a project planned in the near-term to widen Wellborn Road in this area. The next desired project in this area is to construct a grade separation of Wellborn Road and George Bush Drive and Union Pacific Railroad. TxDOT is one of the member agencies of the Bryan/College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO’s 25-year Metropolitan Transportation Plan (2020-2044) identifies the widening of this portion Wellborn Road as one of the projects planned to receive funding in the 2030–2044 horizon. While the project has not been designed to identify precise ROW needs, additional ROW will be needed in order to provide additional lanes. There is an existing 15-foot public utility easement / public access easement / landscape easement on this property along Wellborn Road. The dedication of 20 feet of ROW will have the effect of converting these existing Page 44 of 60 Planning & Zoning Commission June 16, 2022 easements into ROW and add an additional 5 feet in width. The proposed preliminary plan would not need a waiver if the 20 feet of TxDOT ROW Reserve were relabeled as 20 feet of ROW Dedication. In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver: 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; No special circumstances or conditions exist on this property that would prevent ROW dedication from occurring. Adherence to this requirement would not deprive the applicant of reasonable use of their land. Whether the 20 feet area is a dedication or a reserve, the area remaining for development will be the same. One of the proposed lots has been laid out for a potential commercial use that is a viable configuration with the dedication. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; The applicant has stated that granting the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of property rights for the landowner. By dedicating 20 feet along the frontage of Wellborn Road, the property will become shallower in depth so will constrain it to that degree. The applicant’s proposal to dedicate a reserve however restricts the remaining property in the same manner. With the platting, the City can require dedication of ROW to help facilitate the build-out of the Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of the 20 feet of ROW has been determined to be roughly proportionate to the traffic demand that can be created by the establishment of the two lots so the dedication can be required. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and The granting of this waiver would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of other properties in the area as this development will comply with all other standards and requirements found in the Unified Development Ordinance. If not dedicated by plat, the ROW will need to be purchased for the project in the future. The City’s responsibility toward TxDOT projects within the City limits includes contributing 10% of ROW acquisition costs to TxDOT. 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Granting this waiver would not affect the orderly subdivision of other land along the same frontage. The ROW dedication requirement has applied to other properties along Wellborn Road and the waiver will create a more inconsistent right-of-way line along the corridor. Page 45 of 60 Page 46 of 60 Page 47 of 60 CITY OF C O L L E G E S T A T I O N , T E X A S (CALLED 0. 2 6 1 0 O F A N A C R E ) VOL. 3144 , P G. 1 8 7 O.P.R.B.C. T. ADDRESS: 1 0 3 H O L L E M A N D R I V E ZONING: G E N E R A L S U B U R B A N LOT 2 BLOCK 1 1.107 ACRES ZONING: GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSED LAND USE: GENERAL COMMERCIALCITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, ATEXAS HOME RULE MUNICIPALCORPORATION(CALLED 0.572 OF AN ACRE)VOL. 1671, PG. 328O.P.R.B.C.T.ADDRESS: 107 HOLLEMAN DRIVEZONING: GENERAL SUBURBANPROP. 6" SSWR PROP. SSWR MH 5,637 SQ. FT. PRIVATE ACCESS ESMT.HEREBY DEDICATED 4,927 SQ. FT. PRIVATE ACCESS ESMT. HEREBY DEDICATED EX. 6" SSWR EX. GAS LINE HOLLEMAN DRIVEVARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAYVOL. 453, PG. 636D.R.B.C.T.FM 2154 (A.K.A. WELLBORN ROAD)VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY VOL. 171. PG. 181 VOL. 173, PG. 434, 435D.R.B.C.T. LOT 1 BLOCK 1 1.227 ACRES ZONING: GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSED LAND USE: RESTAURANT EX. 8" WATER OWNER:CITY OF COLLEGESTATION, TEXAS ZONING: GENERALSUBURBAN VOL. 1671, PG. 328 P.O.B. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PRIMARY MONUMENT NO. 1 BEARSAPPROX. N07°21'35"E 306.38' CITY OF COLLEGESTATION, TEXASCALLED 24 SQ. FT.VOL. 16441, PG. 82O.P.R.B.C.T.PROP. TXDOT SIDEWALK (BY OTHERS) PROP. TXDOTSIDEWALK(BY OTHERS) PROP. TXDOTSIDEWALK(BY OTHERS) PROP TXDOTSIDEWALK (BY OTHERS) 3,784 SQ. FT.PUBLIC UTILITY ESMT.HEREBY DEDICATED STSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTS S S S S S S SSSSSSSSSSSS S S SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS10.0' WLE VOL. 1151, PG. 76,O.P.R.B.C.T. 15.0' PUE, PAE, & LEVOL. 12187, PG. 77, O.P.R.B.C.T 9.0' PUE, PAE, & LEVOL. 16441, PG. 89O.P.R.B.C.T.20.0' U. G . E . E . VOL. 1 1 6 4 , P G . 6 3 9 , O.P.R. B . C . T . VACAT E D B Y INST.# _ _ _ _ _ _ , O.P.R. B . C . T . ∆ 20.0' O.H.E. E VOL. 1151, P G . 7 3 , O.P.R.B.C.T .20.0'25.0'TXDOT R.O.WRESERVATION 7,005 SQ. FT. 2,823 SQ. FT.PUE, PAE & LEHEREBY DEDICATEDOWNER:CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXASTBMMNS "JPH BENCHMARK"308.81' ∆ ∆ ∆∆25.0 ' PUE26.0 ' P rAE 26.0' PrAE28.0' PrAE 11.0' PUE, PAE, & LE HEREBY DEDICAT E D PROP. TXDOT SIDEWALK(BY OTHERS) 20' PUE HEREBY DEDICATED 25' TXDOT ROW CHAMFERRESERVATION SAFETYBUFFER 13.0' 13.0' 14.5' ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ 28.0' PrAE HOLLEMAN DR.UNION PAC I F IC RA I LROADWEL L BORN RD .THOMPSONEL E A N O R EDWARDO N E Y H E R V E YLUTHER ©COLLEGE STATION042-3257PREPARED FORMCDONALD'S USA LLC06890850105/27/2022LJDMAAAJK05/27/2022PRELIMINARY PLANLEGEND NORTHNOTES 1.PER FEMA MAP NUMBER 48041C0305F DATED APRIL 02, 2014NO FLOOD HAZARD AREAS ARE PRESENT ON THE SUBJECTTRACT.2. REFER TO EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR ADDITIONALEROSION CONTROL MEASURES.3. CURRENT ZONING FOR THIS TRACT IS GENERAL COMMERCIAL. 4. A PRIVATE DETENTION AGREEMENT WILL ALLOW FOR LOT 1TO DRAIN THROUGH LOT 2. EACH LOT WILL MAINTAINSEPARATE AGREED UPON DETENTION VOLUMES AND BERESPONSIBLE FOR ADDITIONAL DETENTION FOR ADDEDIMPERVIOUS COVER ON THAT TRACT. THE FINAL STORMDETENTION LAYOUT ON LOT 2 MAY BE REVISED BUT WILLMAINTAIN THE REQUIRED DETENTION VOLUME. SITE VICINITY SCALE: 1" = 500'-0"NORTH PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED WATER/FIRE LINE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER 1 PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD MCDONALD'S STATION ADDITION LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1 2.334 ACRES CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, A-7 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS OWNER BOBBIE JO ALEXANDER TRUST P.O. BOX 769BRENHAM, TEXAS 77834(979) 830-7840 CIVIL ENGINEER MALLORY MARTIN, P.E. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.11700 KATY FREEWAY, SUITE 800HOUSTON, TEXAS 77079 (281) 597-9300 SURVEYOR JPH LAND SURVEYING, INC.1516 E. PALM VALLEY BLVD., SUITE A4ROUND ROCK, TEXAS 78664 (817) 431-4971 PRELIMINARY PLAN NOTES 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON GRID NORTH (TEXAS COORDINATESYSTEM OF 1983, CENTRAL ZONE)2. NO LOT IN THIS SUBDIVISION IS ENCROACHED BY A SPECIALFLOOD HAZARD AREA INUNDATED BY THE 100-YEAR (1%CHANCE) FLOOD AS IDENTIFIED BY THE U.S. FEDERALEMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCERATE MAP 48041C0305F, DATED 2014/04/02, FOR BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS.3. WATER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF COLLEGESTATION.4. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITYOF COLLEGE STATION.5. THE BENCHMARK (TBM) IS A MAG NAIL WITH A METAL WASHERSTAMPED "JPH BENCHMARK" SET IN A CONCRETE CURB LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST MARGIN OF HOLLEMAN DRIVE, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 225 FEET NORTHEASTERLY FROMTHE NORTHEAST LINE OF F.M. HIGHWAY NO. 2154, ANDAPPROXIMATELY 57 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THENORTHWEST LINE OF HOLLEMAN DRIVE, BENCHMARKELEVATION = 308.81' (NAVD88 GEIOD 18). SEE VICINITY MAPFOR GENERAL LOCATION.6. SUBJECT TO TEMPORARY BLANKET UTILITY EASEMENT VOL. 3928, PG. 170 D.R.B.C.T. 7. SUBJECT TO QWEST EASEMENT AN EASEMENT DEED BYCOURT ORDER IN SETTLEMENT OF LANDOWNER ACTION VOL.12713, PG. 87, D.R.B.C.T.8. PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS TO BE OWNED ANDMAINTAINED BY THE LOT OWNERS.9. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION FOR REGULATIONOF APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, THE FOLLOWING ARE CONSIDERED BUILDING PLOTS: 9.1. LOT 1, BLOCK 19.2. LOT 2, BLOCK 110. THE ROW RESERVE SHOWN HEREON IS INTENDED TO BE ANAREA THAT IS RESERVED FOR FUTURE ROW DEDICATION IFNEEDED BY TXDOT FOR ANY FUTURE WELLBORN ROAD (FM2154) IMPROVEMENTS. EASEMENT IDENTIFICATION PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT PUBLIC UTILITY OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EASEMENT UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EASEMENT PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT WATER LINE EASEMENT LANDSCAPE EASEMENT PrAE PrUE PU O.E.E. U.G.E.E. PAE LE PUE WLE PROPOSED CURB EASEMENT LINE PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED TXDOT SIDEWALK Page 48 of 60 Page 49 of 60 Page 50 of 60 CITY OF C O L L E G E S T A T I O N , T E X A S (CALLED 0. 2 6 1 0 O F A N A C R E ) VOL. 3144 , P G. 1 8 7 O.P.R.B.C. T. ADDRESS: 1 0 3 H O L L E M A N D R I V E ZONING: G E N E R A L S U B U R B A N LOT 2 BLOCK 1 1.107 ACRES ZONING: GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSED LAND USE: GENERAL COMMERCIALCITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, ATEXAS HOME RULE MUNICIPALCORPORATION(CALLED 0.572 OF AN ACRE)VOL. 1671, PG. 328O.P.R.B.C.T.ADDRESS: 107 HOLLEMAN DRIVEZONING: GENERAL SUBURBANPROP. 6" SSWR PROP. SSWR MH 5,637 SQ. FT. PRIVATE ACCESS ESMT.HEREBY DEDICATED 4,927 SQ. FT. PRIVATE ACCESS ESMT. HEREBY DEDICATED EX. 6" SSWR EX. GAS LINE HOLLEMAN DRIVEVARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAYVOL. 453, PG. 636D.R.B.C.T.FM 2154 (A.K.A. WELLBORN ROAD)VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY VOL. 171. PG. 181 VOL. 173, PG. 434, 435D.R.B.C.T. LOT 1 BLOCK 1 1.227 ACRES ZONING: GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSED LAND USE: RESTAURANT EX. 8" WATER OWNER:CITY OF COLLEGESTATION, TEXAS ZONING: GENERALSUBURBAN VOL. 1671, PG. 328 P.O.B. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PRIMARY MONUMENT NO. 1 BEARSAPPROX. N07°21'35"E 306.38' CITY OF COLLEGESTATION, TEXASCALLED 24 SQ. FT.VOL. 16441, PG. 82O.P.R.B.C.T.PROP. TXDOT SIDEWALK (BY OTHERS) PROP. TXDOTSIDEWALK(BY OTHERS) PROP. TXDOTSIDEWALK(BY OTHERS) PROP TXDOTSIDEWALK (BY OTHERS) 3,784 SQ. FT.PUBLIC UTILITY ESMT.HEREBY DEDICATED STSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTS S S S S S S SSSSSSSSSSSS S S SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS10.0' WLE VOL. 1151, PG. 76,O.P.R.B.C.T. 15.0' PUE, PAE, & LEVOL. 12187, PG. 77, O.P.R.B.C.T 9.0' PUE, PAE, & LEVOL. 16441, PG. 89O.P.R.B.C.T.20.0' U. G . E . E . VOL. 1 1 6 4 , P G . 6 3 9 , O.P.R. B . C . T . VACAT E D B Y INST.# _ _ _ _ _ _ , O.P.R. B . C . T . ∆ 20.0' O.H.E. E VOL. 1151, P G . 7 3 , O.P.R.B.C.T .20.0'25.0'TXDOT R.O.WRESERVATION 7,005 SQ. FT. 2,823 SQ. FT.PUE, PAE & LEHEREBY DEDICATEDOWNER:CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXASTBMMNS "JPH BENCHMARK"308.81' ∆ ∆ ∆∆25.0 ' PUE26.0 ' P rAE 26.0' PrAE28.0' PrAE 11.0' PUE, PAE, & LE HEREBY DEDICAT E D PROP. TXDOT SIDEWALK(BY OTHERS) 20' PUE HEREBY DEDICATED 25' TXDOT ROW CHAMFERRESERVATION SAFETYBUFFER 13.0' 13.0' 14.5' ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ 28.0' PrAE HOLLEMAN DR.UNION PAC I F IC RA I LROADWEL L BORN RD .THOMPSONEL E A N O R EDWARDO N E Y H E R V E YLUTHER ©COLLEGE STATION042-3257PREPARED FORMCDONALD'S USA LLC06890850105/27/2022LJDMAAAJK05/27/2022PRELIMINARY PLANLEGEND NORTHNOTES 1.PER FEMA MAP NUMBER 48041C0305F DATED APRIL 02, 2014NO FLOOD HAZARD AREAS ARE PRESENT ON THE SUBJECTTRACT.2. REFER TO EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR ADDITIONALEROSION CONTROL MEASURES.3. CURRENT ZONING FOR THIS TRACT IS GENERAL COMMERCIAL. 4. A PRIVATE DETENTION AGREEMENT WILL ALLOW FOR LOT 1TO DRAIN THROUGH LOT 2. EACH LOT WILL MAINTAINSEPARATE AGREED UPON DETENTION VOLUMES AND BERESPONSIBLE FOR ADDITIONAL DETENTION FOR ADDEDIMPERVIOUS COVER ON THAT TRACT. THE FINAL STORMDETENTION LAYOUT ON LOT 2 MAY BE REVISED BUT WILLMAINTAIN THE REQUIRED DETENTION VOLUME. SITE VICINITY SCALE: 1" = 500'-0"NORTH PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED WATER/FIRE LINE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER 1 PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD MCDONALD'S STATION ADDITION LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1 2.334 ACRES CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, A-7 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS OWNER BOBBIE JO ALEXANDER TRUST P.O. BOX 769BRENHAM, TEXAS 77834(979) 830-7840 CIVIL ENGINEER MALLORY MARTIN, P.E. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.11700 KATY FREEWAY, SUITE 800HOUSTON, TEXAS 77079 (281) 597-9300 SURVEYOR JPH LAND SURVEYING, INC.1516 E. PALM VALLEY BLVD., SUITE A4ROUND ROCK, TEXAS 78664 (817) 431-4971 PRELIMINARY PLAN NOTES 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON GRID NORTH (TEXAS COORDINATESYSTEM OF 1983, CENTRAL ZONE)2. NO LOT IN THIS SUBDIVISION IS ENCROACHED BY A SPECIALFLOOD HAZARD AREA INUNDATED BY THE 100-YEAR (1%CHANCE) FLOOD AS IDENTIFIED BY THE U.S. FEDERALEMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCERATE MAP 48041C0305F, DATED 2014/04/02, FOR BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS.3. WATER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF COLLEGESTATION.4. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITYOF COLLEGE STATION.5. THE BENCHMARK (TBM) IS A MAG NAIL WITH A METAL WASHERSTAMPED "JPH BENCHMARK" SET IN A CONCRETE CURB LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST MARGIN OF HOLLEMAN DRIVE, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 225 FEET NORTHEASTERLY FROMTHE NORTHEAST LINE OF F.M. HIGHWAY NO. 2154, ANDAPPROXIMATELY 57 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THENORTHWEST LINE OF HOLLEMAN DRIVE, BENCHMARKELEVATION = 308.81' (NAVD88 GEIOD 18). SEE VICINITY MAPFOR GENERAL LOCATION.6. SUBJECT TO TEMPORARY BLANKET UTILITY EASEMENT VOL. 3928, PG. 170 D.R.B.C.T. 7. SUBJECT TO QWEST EASEMENT AN EASEMENT DEED BYCOURT ORDER IN SETTLEMENT OF LANDOWNER ACTION VOL.12713, PG. 87, D.R.B.C.T.8. PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS TO BE OWNED ANDMAINTAINED BY THE LOT OWNERS.9. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION FOR REGULATIONOF APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, THE FOLLOWING ARE CONSIDERED BUILDING PLOTS: 9.1. LOT 1, BLOCK 19.2. LOT 2, BLOCK 110. THE ROW RESERVE SHOWN HEREON IS INTENDED TO BE ANAREA THAT IS RESERVED FOR FUTURE ROW DEDICATION IFNEEDED BY TXDOT FOR ANY FUTURE WELLBORN ROAD (FM2154) IMPROVEMENTS. EASEMENT IDENTIFICATION PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT PUBLIC UTILITY OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EASEMENT UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EASEMENT PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT WATER LINE EASEMENT LANDSCAPE EASEMENT PrAE PrUE PU O.E.E. U.G.E.E. PAE LE PUE WLE PROPOSED CURB EASEMENT LINE PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED TXDOT SIDEWALK Page 51 of 60 June 16, 2022 Item No. 5.4. Plan of Work Sponsor:Michael Ostrowski, Director of Planning and Development Reviewed By CBC:N/A Agenda Caption:Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the Plan of Work. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Good Governance Financial Sustainability Core Services & Infrastructure Neighborhood Integrity DIverse & Growing Economy Improving Mobility Sustainable City Recommendation(s): Review the proposed Plan of Work and provide a recommendation. Summary: Historically, the Planning and Zoning Commission has adopted a plan of work relating to initiatives that they want to work on for the upcoming year. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Commission did not adopt a plan of work for 2020. For 2021, staff presented a list of initiatives that staff was or would be working on during the year and the Commission provided comments and direction on those initiatives. While the Planning and Zoning Commission has historically adopted a standalone plan of work, staff would recommend a common plan of work, similar to what was done last year. By creating a common plan of work amongst staff and the Commission, it creates a more effective use of staff resources, as the plan of work identifies all of the major initiatives that staff would be working on during the year. Furthermore, staff would recommend that the plan of work coincide with the fiscal year for the City to better align with resources. Following discussion with the Commission, staff anticipates presenting the Plan of Work to the City Council for any further direction. Enclosed in the packet is a listing of the current initiatives that the department recently completed, is currently working on, or plans to work on this upcoming year. The document is organized by Title: Name of the initiative Summary: A high level summary of what the initiative entails Priority: The priority level of the initiative Status: The current status of the initiative Plan of Work Year: The year that the initiative is anticipated to be in progress. This could include being as part of the plan of work setting for the particular year, or being added as an additional project throughout the year. Anticipated Completion Date: When staff anticipates the initiative to be completed. Page 54 of 60 Completion Date: When the initiative was completed. Update: An update on the initiative since the last discussion. New initiatives will not have an update. During the meeting, staff will give an overview of each of the initiatives to get the Commission's feedback and direction on them. The Commission will also have the opportunity to request additional initiatives as well. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1.PDS Plan of Work Page 55 of 60 TitleSummaryPriority Status Plan of Work Year Anticipated Completion Date Completion Date UpdateOriginBike Lane and Improvements AnalysisAnalyze roadways to determine prime candidates for the addition of bike lanes and/or improvements such as separated bike lanes.Normal Delayed FY2022;FY20239/30/2023This item has not been started, and will be moved to a FY2023 item. Staff;Comprehensive PlanBryan / College Station Unified Design Guidelines UpdateThese guidelines serve as a technical resource for the design and construction of activities in the rights‐of‐way or easements.  This project involves updates to various portions of the guidelines. Normal In‐Progress FY2022;FY20239/30/2023Based on response from initial proposed revisions, the project was divided into 3 phases.  Phase 1 was approved and implemented in early 2021.  Phase 2 should be wrapping up in Q4 of FY22.  Phase 3 will begin shortly thereafter. StaffCensus 2020 Follow UpMonitor Census 2020 data releases from the US Census Bureau. Once data is available, update population figures and projections, identify data trends and conduct analysis. Normal Delayed FY2022;FY202312/31/2023The U.S. Census Bureau recently delayed the next releases of 2020 Census data products. The data releases are significantly later than the releases from the 2010 Census due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. The Demographic Profile and Demographic and Housing Characteristics (DHC) data will be released by May 31, 2023. The Detailed Demographic and Housing Characteristics File (Detailed DHC) will be released in three installments beginning in August 2023. Following the data releases in 2023, staff will begin data analysis and will compile a demographics report. StaffEvaluation of Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) RegulationsContinue the review of UDO requirements that add minimal value as identified by staff and consider opportunities to reduce regulations and streamline processes.Normal Completed FY20223/3/2022Numerous amendments were identified.  Priority is being given to housekeeping amendments, amendments that provide clarity to existing regulation, those that need updating to align with current state statues and building materials, and those directed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Planning and Zoning CommissionImpact Fee 5‐Year UpdateLocal Government Code Chapter 395 requires impact fees be updated every 5 years, or sooner if major changes occur in the Land Use Assumptions or Capital Improvement Plans that were adopted as part of the original study.Critical Completed FY202211/22/2021Water, wastewater and roadway impact fees were adopted at maximum assessable rates with collection rates being increased from existing rates by 10% for residential permits.  Non‐residential collections rates remained the same.   StaffOptions to Preserve Integrity of NeighborhoodsIdentify and analyze options that are intended to preserve the integrity of neighborhoods.Important In‐Progress FY2022;FY202312/31/2022Staff presented options to the City Council in April 2022, where direction was given.  Staff is in the process of doing further analysis on some of those options and will present those to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council when complete. City CouncilPublic Notification RequirementsIdentify all Local Government Code notification requirements for actions impacting Planning and Development Services.  Compare how the required notification requirements differ from current City requirements and whether changes are needed.Important Completed FY202211/22/2021Council directed staff to update the notification requirements for Comprehensive Plan Amendments. This item was recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission on 11/4/21 and approved by City Council on 11/22/21. Changes include requiring a Project Proposal Meeting for nearby property owners for all amendments to the Future Land Use & Character Map, along with the City mailing notifications to all properties within a 200‐foot boundary of the subject property. City Council;StaffPage 1 of 5Page 56 of 60 TitleSummaryPriority Status Plan of Work Year Anticipated Completion Date Completion Date UpdateOriginOff‐Street Parking Ordinance AmendmentExplore the option of reducing or eliminating off‐street parking requirements for certain uses and/or areas. Important In‐Progress FY2022;FY2023 3/31/2023Staff are currently reviewing data and options for the reduction of minimum off‐street parking requirements.  A workshop presentation was held with the Planning and Zoning Commission on 5/19/22 and the City Council on 6/9/22, where each body provided direction.Planning and Zoning Commission;Staff;Comprehensive PlanCreation of Middle Housing Zoning DistrictAdopt an ordinance to create a "middle housing" zoning district, following the Comprehensive Plan update, to implement the new Mixed Residential land use category.Normal In‐Progress FY2022;FY202312/31/2022Staff are currently in the research phase. Next steps will include focus group meetings with the development community, neighborhoods, and a Workshop item with the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council (anticipated in August 2022).Staff;Comprehensive PlanLot‐by‐Lot Grading RequirementsDetermine whether the City should require a grading plan for individual lot developments.Normal In‐Progress FY2022;FY20233/31/2023This item will be scheduled for a future City Council workshop to determine direction.Planning and Zoning Commission;City CouncilMixed‐Use Zoning District Ordinance AmendmentRevise the Mixed‐Use zoning district, following the Comprehensive Plan update, to implement the new Neighborhood Center land use category.Normal In‐Progress FY20229/30/2022Staff are currently in the research phase. Next steps include bringing an ordinance amendment forward for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.Staff;Comprehensive PlanParkland Dedication Ordinance AmendmentAmend the Parkland Dedication Ordinance based on recommendations from the 2019 audit, along with amendments relating to zones, appeals, credits, and fees.Important In‐Progress FY20226/23/2022This proposed ordinance amendment will reduce the number of park zones, as well as modify several other sections of the ordinance.  The modified ordinance went through the approval process last year, but additional changes were requested.  The modified ordinance will go through the May/June approval process.City Council;StaffReduction in Sidewalk ZonesDetermine if the existing number and location of sidewalk zones are appropriate.Normal In‐Progress FY20229/30/2022Staff are currently evaluating changes to current ordinance. This amendment will go to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board, Planning and Zoning Commission, and City Council.  It is anticipated that the sidewalk zones will match the updated park zones.StaffSign Ordinance AmendmentReview and update the City’s sign ordinance in light of the recent Supreme Court decisions regarding sign regulations based upon content and off‐premise.Important Delayed FY2022;FY202312/31/2022The Supreme Court ruling was delivered early, supporting the ability to differentiate between commercial and non‐commercial signage. Template sign ordinances will soon be released by professional organizations.  Staff are waiting to review these ordinances before proceeding with amending the Unified Development Ordinance.StaffSingle‐Family Landscaping RequirementsExplore requiring new single‐family homes to plant a landscape buffer along property lines shared with existing single‐family homes in older neighborhoods.Normal Completed FY20224/14/2022This item will be discussed and considered in combination with the options to preserve neighborhood character.  Specifically, looking at options for landscape buffers between single‐family uses and other uses such as detached shared housing.City CouncilPage 2 of 5Page 57 of 60 TitleSummaryPriority Status Plan of Work Year Anticipated Completion Date Completion Date UpdateOriginComprehensive Plan UpdateFinalize the Comprehensive Plan update and associated maps (Future Land Use & Character Map, Thoroughfare Plan, etc.), host public engagement efforts, and take forward the plan update for possible adoption. Critical Completed FY2022 10/14/2021The updated Comprehensive Plan was recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission on 9/16/21 and was approved by the City Council on 10/14/21. The update included changes to text, graphics, and maps ‐ including the Future Land Use & Character Map and Thoroughfare Plan ‐ along with associated map updates within the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan, the Water System Master Plan, and the Wastewater System Master Plan. Staff are now implementing the updated plan.Staff;Comprehensive PlanNeighborhood Plan AuditAudit the neighborhood plans that are beyond their planning horizon to identify actions that were implemented and those that were not.Important In‐Progress FY20229/30/2022This project is nearing the end of the data collection process. Staff will then create a report and present the findings to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.Staff;Comprehensive PlanSmall Area Plan ‐ University and TexasFrom the 10‐Year Update to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, this project is to create a small area / redevelopment plan for the general area surrounding University Drive / Texas Avenue. Important Delayed FY2022;FY20239/30/2023This project was delayed for the first two quarters of FY22 while determining if the timing was ripe for a small area planning effort in another area of the City. The decision has been made to focus the small area planning efforts on the University Drive and Texas Avenue intersection area, including the former City Hall property. A request for proposals (RFP) for consulting services will be issued in Q4 of FY22.Comprehensive PlanThoroughfare Plan UpdateUpdate the City's Thoroughfare Plan based on new land use assumptions and modeling.Critical Completed FY202210/14/2021The updated Comprehensive Plan was recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission on 9/16/21 and was approved by the City Council on 10/14/21. The update included changes to text, graphics, and maps ‐ including the Future Land Use & Character Map and Thoroughfare Plan ‐ along with associated map updates within the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan, the Water System Master Plan, and the Wastewater System Master Plan. Staff are now implementing the updated plan.Comprehensive PlanTraffic Congestion PlanIdentify current congestion levels in the community and establish key benchmarks.  Then, identify actions that can help the City achieve the key benchmarks.Important In‐Progress FY2022;FY20239/30/2023Creation of plan includes a consultant to analyze congestion data and trends. A service level adjustment (SLA) has been submitted for additional professional services funds for the FY23 budget. City CouncilPresentation ‐ Economic Development UpdatesPresent on current economic development initiatives and projects.Normal In‐Progress FY20227/31/2022Economic Development staff will provide a presentation on economic development updates in July.StaffPresentation ‐ Impact Fee Semi‐Annual ReportingProvide a semi‐annual update on impact fees, to include impact fee collections and planned projects.Normal Completed FY20225/26/2022The semi‐annual reports were acknowledged and placed on file in November 2021 and May 2022. StaffPresentation ‐ Legislative UpdatesPresent on legislative updates that affect planning and development.Normal Completed FY20225/6/2022The Legislature of the State of Texas operates under a biennial system.  The Legislature convenes its regular sessions in January of odd‐numbered years. Therefore, there are no updates at this time. StaffPresentation ‐ Planning and Zoning Commissioner Responsibility and Process QuestionsAllow Commissioners the ability to ask questions about responsibilities and processes.Normal Completed FY20221/26/2022The roles and responsibilities item was presented to members of the Planning and Zoning Commission at the Planning and Zoning Orientation.StaffPage 3 of 5Page 58 of 60 TitleSummaryPriority Status Plan of Work Year Anticipated Completion Date Completion Date UpdateOriginPresentation ‐ Platting Process Present on the current platting requirements. Normal Completed FY2022 1/26/2022The platting process was presented to members of the Planning and Zoning Commission at the orientation. StaffLand Use and Fiscal AnalysisPrepare a land use and fiscal analysis based on the Comprehensive Plan to determine the needed amount of specific land uses and whether that amount matches the Future Land Use & Character Map.  From there, conduct a fiscal analysis based on the amount of land uses, and the cost to serve those land uses compared to the anticipated revenue generated from them.Important New Project FY20239/30/2023City Council;Comprehensive PlanWellborn Community Plan UpdateThe Wellborn Community Plan was adopted by City Council on April 25, 2013. The planning area is located in the southwestern portion of the City and includes much of the remaining historic Wellborn Community.  Since 2013, several changes have occurred, as well as market conditions.  Upon the completion of the Neighborhood Plan Audit project, staff will update this plan. Important New Project FY2023 9/30/2023City Council;StaffUrban Heat Island Mitigation PlanDevelop a five‐year planting plan to mitigate some of the effects of the urban heat island. Important In‐ProgressFY2022 ‐ Additional;FY2023 9/30/2023Staff developed an initial five year planting plan on both City controlled properites as well as a residential program.  This plan was presented to the City Council on 4/14/22.  City Council directed staff to determine what resources would be needed to increase the scope of the plan by two to three times. City Council;Comprehensive PlanDemonstration Project for Revitalization in Residential AreasCity Council directed staff to develop a demonstration project for revitalizing residential areas by creating home ownership opportunities for individuals of low to moderate income. Normal Completed FY2022 ‐ Additional5/26/2022Staff from both Planning and Development Services and Community Services developed three program proposals and presented them to the City Council at their 5/26/22 meeting. Council provided direction to move forward with other initiatives aimed at revitalization and affordable housing.City CouncilImplement Complete Street and Context Sensitive DesignAmend the street cross sections and update the Unified Development Ordinance, the Bryan‐College Station Unified Design Guidelines, and the City’s capital improvement process to implement context sensitive and complete streetdesign such as prioritized mode corridors, reconstruction projects in established neighborhoods, and in areas where right‐of‐way is constrained.Normal New Project FY20239/30/2023Comprehensive PlanDockless Bikeshare Ordinance AmendmentThe City Council adopted an ordinance in 2018 to regulate and permit bike share operators in the city in response to Texas A&M University’s introduction of a bike share program.  The ordinance currently excludes scooters and other electric modes of transportation but since that time, electric modes have been introduced.  Staff received direction in October 2021 to make several amendments to the ordinance, including renaming the ordinance to Shared Micromobility; allowing electric micromobility devices (bicycles and scooters); including an abandonment fee if an operator leaves without taking their devices; further defining the geofence zones; and requiring ‘lock‐to’ parking, rebalancing, parking hubs, cycle liability insurance, and a 15‐mph speed limit.Normal Completed FY2022 ‐ Additional6/9/2022The ordinance amendment was approved by the City Council on June 9, 2022.City CouncilInter Local Agreement with Grimes CountyExecute an inter local agreement with Grimes County to determine platting authority in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the county.Normal In‐Progress FY2022 ‐ Additional9/30/2022The City Council provided direction to maintain platting authority in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of Grimes County.  Staff will work with Grimes County to bring back an agreement reflecting that direction.StaffPage 4 of 5Page 59 of 60 TitleSummaryPriority Status Plan of Work Year Anticipated Completion Date Completion Date UpdateOriginCluster Subdivision Ordinance AmendmentCity Council directed staff to amend the cluster subdivision ordinance to encourage its use in subdivision design.Normal In‐Progress FY2022 ‐ Additional8/31/2022Staff presented at a City Council workshop where the City Council gave direction to staff to look at coming up with amendments or incentives to encourage the increased use of the cluster subdivision option.  Staff has been working on ordinance amendments and anticipates to present those amendments shortly.City Council;Comprehensive PlanPage 5 of 5Page 60 of 60