HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/02/2022 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionCollege Station, TX
Meeting Agenda
Planning and Zoning Commission
1101 Texas Ave, College Station, TX 77840
Internet: https://zoom.us/j/84149209658
Phone: 888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 841 4920 9658
The City Council may or may not attend this meeting.
June 2, 2022 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, TX Page 1
Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical
location stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating
by videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a
thirdparty vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable,
meeting access and participation will be in-person only.
1.Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
2.Hear Visitors
At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues
not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. An individual who wishes to address the Commission
regarding any item on the agenda shall register with the Commission Secretary prior to 4 p.m. on the
day of the meeting. To register, the individual must provide a name and phone number by calling
979.764.3751 or emailing khejny@cstx.gov prior to 4 p.m. To submit written comments to the
Commission, email khejny@cstx.gov and they will be distributed to the Commission. The visitor
presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address
the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will
receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda
for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.)
3.Consent Agenda
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be
enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found
compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with
any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens
wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address
the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent
Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
3.1.Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Attachments:1.May 19 2022
4.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
5.Regular Agenda
Page 1 of 44
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 2 June 2, 2022
5.1.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map from Suburban Residential to
Neighborhood Commercial for approximately 5 acres of land, located at 2354 Barron Road. Case
#CPA2021-000005 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 23, 2022 City
Council Meeting- Subject to change.)
Sponsors:Derrick Williams
Attachments:1.Staff Report
2.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
3.Comprehensive Plan Exhibit
4.Background Information
5.Supporting Information
5.2.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4, "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District on approximately
5 acres of land located at 2354 Barron Road. Case #REZ2022-000003 (Note: Final action of this
item will be considered at the June 23, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change).
Sponsors:Derrick Williams
Attachments:1.Staff Report
2.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
3.Rezoning Exhibit
4.Background Information
5.Applicant’s Supporting Information
6.Bulk Variances Letter
7.Concept Plan
8.Rezoning Map
5.3.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding waiver requests to the Unified
Development Ordinance Section 8.3.G, 'Blocks' and Section 8.3.E.3.a 'Street Projections' and
presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Preliminary Plan for Brewster Pointe
Subdivision III on approximately 88 acres, generally located at the corner of W.S. Phillips
Parkway and Brewster Drive. Case #PP2021-000012
Sponsors:Jesse Dimeolo
Attachments:1.Staff Report
2.Waiver Request
3.Applicants Supporting Information
4.Waiver Exhibit
5.Vicinity Map and Aerial
6.Preliminary Plan
6.Informational Agenda
6.1.Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
6.2.Discussion of Minor / Amending Plats approved by staff:
Page 2 of 44
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 3 June 2, 2022
Heidtke Subdivision: Block 1, Lots 1 & 2 ~ Case #FP2021-000027
Sponsors:Anthony Armstrong
6.3.Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
Thursday, June 9, 2022 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00
p.m. (Liaison - Cornelius)
Thursday, June 16, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers 6:00 p.m.
Thursday, June 23, 2022 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting
5:00 p.m. (Liaison - Wright)
Thursday, July 7, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
6.4.Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor
Board.
7.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
8.Adjourn.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed
on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on May 27, 2022 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting
and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD
at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the
meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification
at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to
provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly
Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.
Page 3 of 44
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 4 June 2, 2022
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire
libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411,
Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad
portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 4 of 44
May 19, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 6
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
May 19, 2022 6:00 p.m. Phone: *888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 881 9073 7967 Internet: https://zoom.us/j/88190737967
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Dennis Christiansen, Bobby Mirza, William Wright, Jason Cornelius, Mark Smith, Thomas Jackson, and Melissa McIlhaney
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: John Nichols and Dennis Maloney CITY STAFF PRESENT: Michael Ostrowski, Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, Jason Schubert, Erika Bridges, Anthony Armstrong, Alyssa Halle-Schramm, Lucas Harper, Jesse DiMeolo, Derrick Williams, Bekha Wells, Naomi Sing, Katherine Beaman-Jamael, Matthew Ellis, Leslie Whitten, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
Chairperson Christiansen called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
3. Consent Agenda
3.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
• May 5, 2022
3.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Greens Prairie Reserve Section 1, Phase 104 on approximately 15.7 acres, generally located southwest of the intersection of Diamondback Drive and Arrington Road. Case #FP2020-000030
3.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Mission Ranch Subdivision Phase 104 on approximately 6.1 acres, generally located northwest of the intersection of Rock Prairie Road West and Feather Run. Case #FP2020-000032
Commissioner Cornelius motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Wright seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action.
No items were removed. 5. Regular Agenda 5.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2,
Page 5 of 44
May 19, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 6
“Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from C-3 Light Commercial to GC General Commercial on
approximately 1.26 acres of land located at 4180 State Highway 6 South. Case #REZ2021-000012 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 9, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Staff Planner Williams presented this item to the Commission, recommending approval. Commissioner McIlhaney arrived at 6:04 p.m. Chairperson Christiansen asked for clarification on the type of signage the Arts Council wanted to use.
Staff Planner Williams stated that signage has not been proposed. Chairperson Christiansen opened the public hearing.
No visitors spoke.
Chairperson Christiansen closed the public hearing. Commissioner Wright motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning. Commissioner Cornelius seconded the motion, the motion passed (7-0). Chairperson Christiansen recessed the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting at 6:08 p.m. and called to order the Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC). Chairperson Christiansen reconvened the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting at 6:47 p.m. 5.2 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 2.3, “Zoning Board of Adjustment,” Section 3.17, “Written Interpretation,” Section 3.19, “Variance,” and Section 3.20, “Administrative Appeal” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, regarding the powers, duties, and processes of the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Case #ORDA2021-000008 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 9, 2022 City Council Meeting – subject to change.)
Assistant Director of Planning & Development Services Hitchcock presented this item to the Commission, recommending approval. Chairperson Christiansen opened the public hearing. Veronica Morgan, College Station, inquired about the 20-day deadline. Chairperson Christiansen closed the public hearing. Commissioner Cornelius motioned to recommend approval of the Ordinance Amendment. Commissioner Wright seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0).
Page 6 of 44
May 19, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 6
5.3 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 7, “Subdivision Design and
Improvements,” Section 8.8, “Requirements for Park Land Dedication,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, in its entirety, including amending the official Park Zones Map and land dedication and fee amounts. Case #ORDA2021-000004 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 23, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski presented this item to the Commission, recommending approval. Chairperson Christiansen asked for the input and comments from the Parks Board. Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski stated that Board Members inquired as to
why someone would not want to do this, as well as questions about an increase in fees. Mr. Ostrowski also stated that Board Members asked why the proportionate rate for land dedication decreased, clarifying that the rate decreased because of the addition of additional park acres to the
park system. Chairperson Christiansen asked how City of College Station rates compare to sister cities.
Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski provided sister city numbers to the Commission. Commissioner Wright asked for the difference between public and private parks. Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski clarified that if a park remains private, they receive a 25% credit. Commissioner McIlhaney inquired about the 7.8 acres per thousand people, asking if there is an active and passive number.
Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski stated that this number comes from the Parks & Recreation Master Plan. Mr. Ostrowski also stated that the plan did break out neighborhood and community parks, and they were about 50% each. Commissioner Wright expressed a desire to keep the four zones.
Commissioner McIlhaney asked if the parkland funds are for new parks or rehabilitation. Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski clarified that parkland funds are used for the development of new parks or the improvement of existing parks. Chairperson Christiansen opened the public hearing. Veronica Morgan, College Station, expressed concerns for parkland funds collected in one area and being used elsewhere if there were only four park zones in the City. Ms. Morgan also expressed concerns for increases, stating that grandfathering and maintenance costs are an important factor.
Page 7 of 44
May 19, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 6
Commissioner McIlhaney asked for the overall construction budget for a project with the increased fee.
Ms. Morgan was not sure of the percentage. Chairperson Christiansen closed the public hearing. Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski clarified that the proportionate rate does not dictate the actual fee amount as the collection rate will need to be set by the City Council. Mr. Ostrowski further stated that for developments in place and qualifying under vesting, they would continue to pay the same rate as dictated by the permit application date. Chairperson Christiansen asked how the number of zones were figured.
Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski stated that zones are depicted by population, amount of parks, where development is likely to occur, consistency with other zones,
such as impact fees. Mr. Ostrowski also stated that the statues do not define how many zones the City must have.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission. Commissioner Wright motioned to recommend approval of the Ordinance Amendment. Commissioner Mirza seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0). Chairperson Christiansen recessed the meeting at 7:43 p.m. Chairperson Christiansen reconvened the meeting at 7:48 p.m.
6. Informational Agenda
6.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
6.2 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
• Thursday, May 26, 2022 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison – Christiansen)
• Thursday, June 2, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, June 9, 2022 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison – Cornelius)
• Thursday, June 16, 2022 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. There was no discussion.
6.3 Presentation and discussion regarding off-street parking requirements as a part of the Plan of Work.
Staff Planner DiMeolo presented this item to the Commission.
Page 8 of 44
May 19, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 6
Commissioner Wright asked how the City evaluates Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
Staff Planner DiMeolo stated that ADA requirements are based on the number of spaces provided.
Commissioner Wright asked how this will change the 1:1parking ratio.
Staff Planner DiMeolo stated that the 1:1 ratio will depend on the development.
Commissioner Cornelius asked why bicycle parking is directly tied to the number of spaces.
Staff Planner DiMeolo stated that under the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) the number of bicycle parking spaces required depends on how many vehicle parking spaces are required, but this may need to change if we change vehicle parking requirements.
Commissioner Jackson expressed concerns for removing the minimum space requirements, stating that developers have an obligation to provide adequate parking.
Commissioner Smith asked if staff looked at how removing the minimum could impact on-street
parking and the City’s ability to add bicycle lanes.
Staff Planner DiMeolo stated that would potentially be one of the disadvantages with a higher demand for on-street parking.
Commissioner McIlhaney stated that recent rezonings presented to the Commission had requests for parking concessions and commented that businesses will operate in their own self-interest. Ms. McIlhaney also stated that staff needs to examine residential implications.
Commissioner Jackson expressed that the City had obligation to look after future residents.
Commissioner Wright spoke in favor of eliminating parking minimums for non-residential developments.
Commissioner McIlhaney expressed a concern with an unintended consequence between a developer and end user.
Commissioner Mirza expressed concerns with the logic of reducing parking per bedroom.
Commissioner Wright stated that he would like to hear from Fire regarding safety concerns.
Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski clarified that the City currently does not have maximum parking requirements.
Commissioner McIlhaney asked if current projects are going overboard with parking.
Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski stated that parking needs depend on the
user and location.
Page 9 of 44
May 19, 2022 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 6
6.4 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board.
There was no discussion. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion.
8. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 8:22 p.m. Approved: Attest:
______________________________ ________________________________ Dennis Christiansen, Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Page 10 of 44
June 02, 2022
Regular Agenda
Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Barron & Victoria
To:Planning & Zoning Commission
From:Derrick Williams, Staff Planner
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance
amending the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map from Suburban Residential to
Neighborhood Commercial for approximately 5 acres of land, located at 2354 Barron Road. Case
#CPA2021-000005 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 23, 2022 City Council
Meeting- Subject to change.)
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request from Suburban Residential to
Neighborhood Commercial.
Summary: The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and
Character Map from Suburban Residential to Neighborhood Commercial on approximately 5 acres of
land located at 2354 Barron Road. The subject property and properties to the north, east, and west are
primarily designated as Suburban Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and
Character Map, while the property to the south is Institutional/Public where College Station High School
is located. The comprehensive plan amendment request is in conjunction with a proposed rezoning on
the property from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District with a Suburban Commercial base to
allow for small scale commercial opportunities.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Changed or changing conditions in the subject area of the City: The subject property and the
surrounding properties have a designation of Suburban Residential. Suburban Residential consists
primarily of single-family residential lots that include townhomes, duplexes, other housing types
as well as some non-residential uses that are compatible with surrounding single-family areas.
The Neighborhood Commercial land use designation is generally for concentrations of commercial
activities that cater primarily to nearby residents versus the larger community or region.
Generally, these areas tend to be small in size and located adjacent to major roads (arterials and
collectors). The design of structures is intended to be compatible with surrounding single-family
residential neighborhoods. Institutional/Public is located at the southwestern corner of the
intersection of Barron and Victoria and is developed as College Station High School. Properties to
the west and across Victoria to the east have a Suburban Residential land use designation and are
developed as residential properties within the nearby subdivisions. The southeastern corner of
Barron and Victoria is designated as Neighborhood Commercial is partially developed as a medical
clinic. The character of this area has changed in this last 10 years with developments such as CSHS
and medical office spaces bringing educational and medical uses to a primarily residential area.
Staff analyzed this property with the 10-Year evaluation and update to the Comprehensive Plan
but kept the existing residential land use classification (which was renamed to Suburban
Residential) to allow for a more neighborhood-scale discussion at a future date if private
development and market pressures requested commercial uses on this property. The change of
this property to Neighborhood Commercial is appropriate and would serve the nearby residents
and students from CSHS as they can utilize commercial spaces where they live and attend school.
Page 11 of 44
2. Compatibility with the existing uses, development patterns, and character of the immediate
area concerned, the general area, and the City as a whole: The Neighborhood Commercial land
use designation is intended for commercial uses that are of a scale and design aesthetic to be
compatible with surrounding single-family residential neighborhoods. This area of southern
College Station is primarily residential in nature with limited commercial uses. While the current
land use designation on the property would allow for residential uses, being located at the
intersection of Victoria Ave. (a 2-Lane Major Collector) and Barron Rd. (a 4-Lane Minor Arterial) is
not an ideal location for residential development. The proposed Neighborhood Commercial use
would allow additional small scale commercial uses at the intersection of two major roadways and
support the surrounding residential areas.
3.Impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas: There is no FEMA designated floodplain
on the property. The applicant has stated that the subject property will follow city codes and
ordinances and will not have adverse impacts on the surrounding areas.
4. Impacts on infrastructure including water, wastewater, drainage, and the transportation
network: Sanitary sewer service, water service, and fire flow will be provided by College Station
Utilities. Stormwater will be designed according to BCS Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines and
will be collected in an on-site detention pond before being released into an underground storm
water system. The subject property is not encumbered by FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area.
Drainage and all other infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. A traffic impact analysis (TIA)
was required and performed for the rezoning requested and did not identify any traffic mitigation
needed.
5. Consistency with the goals and strategies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan: The goal for
College Station’s Future Land Use and Character Map is to create a community with strong,
unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a protected
and enhanced natural environment. While it is not currently consistent with comprehensive plan
being that its Suburban Residential and pairing it with the Rezoning and it being approved, then it
would be compatible. The area as a whole is very limited with commercial, as a vast majority is
residential. With its location is near a major collector and a minor arterial, commercial uses at the
intersection in that area will support the surrounding residential areas which allow for residents of
the nearby subdivisions as well as students at nearby CSHS to take advantage of the commercial
uses.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2. Comprehensive Plan Exhibit
3. Background Information
4. Applicant’s Supporting Information
5. Concept Plan
Page 12 of 44
Page 13 of 44
Page 14 of 44
Page 15 of 44
WINDMEADOWSDRLEYLA LNCORDOVARIDGECTTRANQUIL PATH DRBARRON RDRENEELNVICTORIA AVE611389102514127MORGAN ROBERT CA005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 81Acres:4.987Current Land Use: Suburban ResidentialLand Use Plan AmendmentMapT. 979.260.6963F. 979.260.35643204 Earl Rudder FWY SCollege Station, TX 77845Plan & Design Specialists in Civil ꞏ Engineering ꞏ HydraulicsHydrology ꞏ Utilities ꞏ StreetsSite Plans ꞏ Subdivisionswww.mitchellandmorgan.comEx. AMarch2022§NOTE: This site does not lie within the 100-year floodplain boundary per FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map panels 48041C0325E, Effective Date: May 16, 2012EXISTINGPROPOSED2354BarronRoad611389102514127WINDMEADOWSDRLEYLA LNCORDOVARIDGECTTRANQUIL PATH DRBARRON RDRENEELNVICTORIA AVEMORGAN ROBERT CA005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 81Acres:4.987Proposed Land Use: Neighborhood Commercial1 inch = 150 feetComprehensive PlanLand UseInstitutional/PublicNeighborhood CommercialSuburban ResidentialVICINITY MAPDRESDENLNBRANDENBUR GLNTRIUMPH CTLIENZLNSANTOUR CTFAIM ESCTLATINNE CTSIM I DR
CORDOVARIDGECTJEANNE DRDELREY DRLADOVE DRJAMEY LNPO MEL DRNEW PORT LNSILVEROAKDRTRA NQ U ILP A T H DRSPRINGMISTD RREAT TALN
FIELDSTONEP LA C E
MEIR LNWALCOURTLOOPPASSENDALE LNROUCOURTLOOPHOFBURG DRRENEE LNWILLIAM D FITCH PKYEAGLE AVEVIC TOR IA AVEBARRON RDMCLAREN DRSITEStreetClassification2 Lane Major Collector4 Lane Minor ArterialLocal StreetPage 16 of 44
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 2, 2022
Advertised Council Hearing Date: June23, 2022
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Westfield Village
Edelweiss Gartens
Property owner notices mailed: 28
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition:2 at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts:2 at the time of this report
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Suburban Residential R Rural Mobile/Manufactured Home
South Institution/Public R Rural Public Facilities
East Suburban Residential PDD Single-Family Residential
West Suburban Residential GS General Suburban Single-Family Residential
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation:
Zoning: 1995 – R Rural
Final Plat:Unplatted
Site development:Site is undeveloped
Page 17 of 44
Name of Project:2354 BARRON ROAD
Address:2354 BARRON RD
Legal Description:A005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 81, 4.9699 ACRES
Total Acreage:4.97
Applicant::
Property Owner:MORGAN ROBERT C
MITCHELL & MORGAN
What element of the Comprehensive Plan and at what location is requested to be amended?
Land Use Plan Amendment at 2354 Barron Road
What is the amendment requested?
We request to amend the Land Use Plan from Residential Suburban to Neighborhood Commercial.
How will this change be compatible with the existing uses, development patterns, and character of the
immediate area concerned, the general area, and the city as a whole?
Residential uses developed around this property and was left without opportunity to integrate into the existing
subdivisions surrounding it. With its location at the corner of two thoroughfares and without opportunity to
seamlessly integrate into the residential areas, the best use for this tract has evolved into small-scale
neighborhood commercial uses.
COMP PLAN APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
What is the reason for the amendment?
The subject property is adjacent to properties that are already developed as single-family or developed as a
single large-lot residence. This tract would be developed independently and would not be cohesively integrated
into the surrounding residential developments, nor have access to the residential street network. Additionally, the
property is located at the intersection of a Minor Arterial and Major Collector. The Comprehensive Plan states
that Neighborhood Commercial land uses tend to be located adjacent to major roads along the fringe of
residential areas. This tract is more ideal and better suited for commercial activities than residential
development.
Page 1 of 2
Page 18 of 44
Explain the impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas and infrastructure, including water,
wastewater, drainage and transportation network.
Neighborhood commercial land uses are intended to cater primarily to nearby residents. According to the
Comprehensive Plan, these areas tend to be smaller format than general commercial and the structures are
compatible in size, architecture and lot coverage with surrounding residential uses. Neighborhood commercial at
this scale is designed to be compatible with residential and blend in with the character of the neighborhoods.
This neighborhood commercial development will provide small scale retail and services that will cater to the
residents and complement the character of the neighborhoods and school activities that make up this part of
College Station.
Explain how this change will be consistant with the goals and strategies set forth in the Comprehensive
Plan.
Neighborhood commercial land uses are intended to cater primarily to nearby residents. According to the
Comprehensive Plan, these areas tend to be smaller format than general commercial and the structures are
compatible in size, architecture and lot coverage with surrounding residential uses. Neighborhood commercial at
this scale is designed to be compatible with residential and blend in with the character of the neighborhoods.
This neighborhood commercial development will provide small scale retail and services that will cater to the
residents and complement the character of the neighborhoods and school activities that make up this part of
College Station.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
N/A
List any other additional properties.
N/A
Page 2 of 2
Page 19 of 44
June 02, 2022
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – Barron & Victoria
To:Planning & Zoning Commission
From:Derrick Williams, Staff Planner
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance
amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning
district boundaries from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 5 acres of land
located at 2354 Barron Road. Case #REZ2022-000003 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at
the June 23, 2022 City Council Meeting – Subject to change).
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request.
Summary: The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 5 acres of land located where Barron
Road and Victoria Road intersect from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning
of SC Suburban Commercial. The change in the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to PDD Planned
Development District, would bring small scale commercial opportunities to a vacant tract of land
located at the intersection of Victoria Ave. (a 2-Lane Major Collector) and Barron Rd. (a 4-Lane Minor
Arterial)
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject property has a future land use designation on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use and Character Map as Suburban Residential. The Comprehensive Plan states that Suburban
Residential is intended for primarily single-family residential areas that consist of low to moderate
density single-family lots. These areas may also include limited townhomes, duplexes, other
housing types, and some non-residential uses that are compatible with surrounding single-family
areas. Development types tend to be highly consistent within a subdivision or neighborhood.
This rezoning request is accompanied by a Comprehensive Plan amendment request for
Neighborhood Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan generally describes the Neighborhood
Commercial land use designations follows: Neighborhood Commercial – Areas of commercial
activities that cater primarily to nearby residents. These areas tend to be smaller format than
general commercial and located adjacent to major roads along the fringe of residential areas.
Design of these structures is compatible in size, architecture, and lot coverage with surrounding
residential uses.
In its current form, Neighborhood Commercial would not be consistent with the proposed
amendment from Suburban Residential. With the approval of the comprehensive plan
amendment, smaller scaled commercial opportunities would be in line with Neighborhood
Commercial as stated in the comprehensive plan where they are usually along the fringe of
residential areas.
Page 20 of 44
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context
of the surrounding area:
PDD Planned Development District will be based on the SC Suburban Commercial zoning district
which is designed to be compatible with residential land uses. Given the property’s proximity to
existing single-family uses, the intended use of commercial could be appropriate in the context
with the existing developments. Small scale commercial uses at a major intersection will support
the surrounding residential areas which allow for residents of the nearby subdivisions as well as
students at nearby CSHS to take advantage of the commercial uses. This allows for a range of
limited commercial uses that are compatible with nearby neighborhoods while not allowing any
single structure in this district to exceed 15,000 square feet in area. Also, as a community benefit
being offered with this proposed PDD, the applicant is proposing to remove fuel sales as a
permitted use on this tract of land.
3.Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
While adjacent to a neighborhood, the subject property’s only street frontage is to rights-of-way
shared with other non-residentially zoned properties. There is no FEMA-designated floodplain on
the property. The subject property is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
Sanitary sewer service, water service, and fire flow will be provided by College Station Utilities.
Stormwater will be designed according to BCS Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines and will be
collected in an on-site detention pond before being released into an underground storm water
system. The subject property is not encumbered by FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area. Drainage
and all other infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in
accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. A traffic impact analysis was performed for
the rezoning requested and did not identify any traffic mitigation needed.
5. The marketability of the property:
The property in its current state, is an undeveloped area where agricultural and rural uses would
not be marketable nor appropriate for its location. However, the marketability of the property
would increase if rezoned for small scaled commercial uses. This area of southern College Station
is primarily residential in nature with limited commercial uses. While the current land use
designation on the property would allow for residential uses, being located at the intersection of
Victoria Ave. (a 2-Lane Major Collector) and Barron Rd. (a 4-Lane Minor Arterial) is not an ideal
location for residential development. The proposed rezoning would allow for small scale
commercial uses at the intersection of two major roadways and support the surrounding
residential areas.
REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN
The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building and
parking areas as well as other site related features. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also
request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those
variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development.
The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for
reviewing PDD Concept Plans:
1.The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony
with the character of the surrounding area;
Page 21 of 44
2.The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the
intent and purpose of this Section;
3.The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not
adversely affect adjacent development;
4.Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public
street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners
association;
5.The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not
limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities;
6.The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
7.The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular,
bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be
generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area
considering existing zoning and land uses in the area.
Purpose, Intent and Community Benefits:
The proposed Planned Development District for this property outlines the purpose, intent, and
community benefit of the proposed development which is to promote and encourage innovative
development that is sensitive to surrounding land uses and natural environment.
Base Zoning and Meritorious Modifications
At the time of site plan, the project will need to meet all applicable site development standards and
platting requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance for the SC Suburban Commercial zoning
district, except where meritorious modifications are granted with the PDD zoning. The applicant is
requesting the following meritorious modification:
None
Community Benefits: The applicant offers the following as community benefits:
To remove fuel sales as a permitted use.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request and associated concept plan to
PDD Planned Development District.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2. Rezoning Exhibit
3. Background Information
4. Applicant’s Supporting Information
5. Bulk Variances Letter
6. Concept Plan Exhibit
7. Rezoning Map
Page 22 of 44
Page 23 of 44
Page 24 of 44
Page 25 of 44
WINDMEADOWSDRLEYLA LNCORDOVARIDGECTTRANQUIL PATH DRBARRON RDRENEELNVICTORIA AVE01234567891012MORGAN ROBERT CA005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 81Acres:4.987Current Zoning:RuralCurrent Land Use: Suburban ResidentialRezoning MapT. 979.260.6963F. 979.260.35643204 Earl Rudder FWY SCollege Station, TX 77845Plan & Design Specialists in Civil ꞏ Engineering ꞏ HydraulicsHydrology ꞏ Utilities ꞏ StreetsSite Plans ꞏ Subdivisionswww.mitchellandmorgan.comEx. ADecember2021§NOTE: This site does not lie within the 100-year floodplain boundary per FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map panels 48041C0310F, Effective Date: April 2, 2014EXISTINGPROPOSED2354BarronRoad01234567891012MORGAN ROBERT CA005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 81Acres:4.987Current Zoning:RuralCurrent Land Use: Suburban ResidentialWINDMEADOWSDRLEYLA LNCORDOVARIDGECTBARRON RDRENEELNVICTORIA AVE1 inch = 150 feetParcel thick borderZoningDescriptionGeneral SuburbanPlanned Development DistrictRuralSuburban CommercialDRESDENLNBRANDENBUR GLNTRIUMPH CTLIENZLNSANTOUR CTFAIM ESCTLATINNE CTSIM I DR
CORDOVARIDGECTJEANNE DRDELREY DRLADOVE DRJAMEY LNPO MEL DRNEW PORT LNSILVEROAKDRTRA NQ U ILP A T H DRSPRINGMISTD RREAT TALN
FIELDSTONEP LA C E
MEIR LNWALCOURTLOOPPASSENDALE LNROUCOURTLOOPHOFBURG DRRENEE LNWILLIAM D FITCH PKYEAGLE AVEVIC TOR IA AVEBARRON RDMCLAREN DRSITEVICINITY MAPIDNAMELEGAL DESCRIPTIONCURRENT ZONINGCURRENT LAND USE0 TRAHAN JAMES S & JANIS SNEEDHAM ESTATES, BLOCK 3, LOT 7R General Suburban Suburban Residential1 KYLLONEN TIMOTHY & MICHELLENEEDHAM ESTATES, BLOCK 3, LOT 2R General Suburban Suburban Residential2 CAMACHO RODRIGO FELINA & JACQUE LYNN AGUDELO NEEDHAM ESTATES, BLOCK 3, LOT 10R General Suburban Suburban Residential3 VEVERICA BRANDON MNEEDHAM ESTATES, BLOCK 3, LOT 5R General Suburban Suburban Residential4 MONTEMAYOR JOSHUANEEDHAM ESTATES, BLOCK 3, LOT 4R General Suburban Suburban Residential5 TREIBS KYLE & CARIN ELISENEEDHAM ESTATES, BLOCK 3, LOT 3R General Suburban Suburban Residential6 WALKER-SMITH KIMBERLYNEEDHAM ESTATES, BLOCK 3, LOT 11R General Suburban Suburban Residential7 ACP RESIDENTIAL HOLDINGS LLCNEEDHAM ESTATES, BLOCK 3, LOT 8R General Suburban Suburban Residential8 SAVAGE EUGENE B IIIBALD PRAIRIE, LOT 11, ACRES 3.82Rural Suburban Residential9 HARDING MARKNEEDHAM ESTATES, BLOCK 3, LOT 9R General Suburban Suburban Residential10 KYLLONEN TIMOTHY & MICHELLENEEDHAM ESTATES, BLOCK 3, LOT 1R General Suburban Suburban Residential11 MORGAN ROBERT CA005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 81, 4.9699 ACRES, SER# SN226923A, HUD# RAD1196394 Rural Suburban Residential12 ALAM MOHAMMAD JAHANGIR &NEEDHAM ESTATES, BLOCK 3, LOT 6R General Suburban Suburban ResidentialParcel thick borderStreetClassificationPrivate2 Lane Major Collector4 Lane Minor ArterialPage 26 of 44
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 2, 2022
Advertised Council Hearing Date: June23, 2022
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Westfield Village
Edelweiss Gartens
Property owner notices mailed: 28
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition:2 at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts:2 at the time of this report
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Suburban Residential R Rural Mobile/Manufactured Home
South Institution/Public R Rural Public Facilities
East Suburban Residential PDD Single-Family Residential
West Suburban Residential GS General Suburban Single-Family Residential
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation:
Zoning: 1995 – R Rural
Final Plat:Unplatted
Site development:Site is undeveloped
Page 27 of 44
Page 1 of 4
REZONING PDD APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Name of Project: 2354 BARRON ROAD PDD
Address: 2354 BARRON RD
Legal Description: A005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 81, 4.9699 ACRES
Total Acreage: 4.97
Applicant: MITCHELL & MORGAN
Property Owner: MORGAN ROBERT C
List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change
necessary.
Residential uses developed around this property and the tract was left without opportunity to integrate into the
existing subdivisions surrounding it. With its location at the corner of two thoroughfares and without
opportunity to seamlessly integrate into the residential areas, the best use for this tract has evolved into small-
scale neighborhood commercial uses.
Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
explain why the Plan is incorrect.
We have requested a Land Use Plan Amendment from Suburban Residential to Neighborhood Commercial.
Residential uses developed around this property and the tract was left without opportunity to integrate into the
existing subdivisions surrounding it. Developing this property for single-family is an inefficient use of land and
not using it as the highest and best use at this location. We believe Neighborhood Commercial is more
suitable for the tract than Suburban Residential.
How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby
property and with the character of the neighborhood?
The property is currently zoned R Rural, which was the zoning placed on the property upon annexation. This
area of College Station is largely developed for single-family residences and supporting uses. This tract is not
suitable for rural and agricultural uses.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
Neighborhood commercial uses are intended to serve the residential areas nearby and the ordinances ensure
that the size and design of the site as well as the buildings are compatible to the adjacent residences. This
property is surrounded by several subdivisions that would benefit from the convenience of the small-scale
retail and services in their neighborhood.
Page 28 of 44
Page 2 of 4
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
Neighborhood commercial uses are intended to serve the residential areas nearby and the ordinances ensure
that the size and design of the site as well as the buildings are compatible to the adjacent residences. This
property is surrounded by several subdivisions that would benefit from the convenience of the small-scale
retail and services in their neighborhood.
Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
This is a developed area of College Station where agricultural and rural uses would not be marketable.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
N/A
Maximum Building Height.
23-42'
Proposed Drainage.
Stormwater will be designed according to BCS Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines and will be collected in
an underground stormwater system.
Variations Sought.
Please see the attached letter.
Community Benefits.
Please see the attached letter.
Page 29 of 44
Page 3 of 4
Sustained Stability.
– This development is designed to be compatible with the neighborhood and will contribute to the surrounding
area’s character and stability. Having a mix of uses that serve and complement the neighborhood will be an
asset to the area.
Conformity.
Based on the desires stated in the Comprehensive Plan for infill development, providing neighborhood
services and retail uses at this location would implement the goals to promote a walkable, sustainable
residential area. This property is located in the heart of a large residential area that could benefit from the
convenience of these uses. There is the potential for this center to be a gathering place, and a neighborhood
destination. If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved, the rezoning would be in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Compatibility with use.
The concept plan displays required buffer yards that will protect the abutting residential uses from the
commercial activities.
Access to Streets.
This development does not include any dwelling units.
Public Improvements.
This development will provide all necessary infrastructure to the site.
Public Health.
The concept plan is respective of development standards for neighborhood commercial sites and will not be a
detriment to the community. Rather, the neighborhood retail site will be a valued addition to the surrounding
neighborhoods.
Safety.
This development is required to provide a Traffic Impact Analysis and make improvements to the site as
directed by the recommendations in the analysis and by the Transportation Planning staff. We intend to make
any improvements required for vehicular circulation. Bike lanes and sidewalks are available on Barron Road
and Victoria Avenue and will remain. We intend to make sure that all pedestrians can access and travel safely
to and from this development.
Page 30 of 44
Page 4 of 4 Page 31 of 44
Page 32 of 44
Page 33 of 44
Planning & Zoning Commission
June 2, 2022
Scale 88 single family lots and 7.4 acres of common area on
approximately 30 acres of land
Location Generally located west of the intersection of W.S. Phillips
Parkway and Brewster Drive
Applicant Schultz Engineering
Project Manager Jesse Dimeolo, Staff Planner
jdimeolo@cstx.gov
Project Overview This preliminary plan is for a single-family residential
development along two minor collector thoroughfares and
one minor arterial. The preliminary plan layout shows the
public street extensions of Brewster Drive and Etonbury
Avenue. Due to the length of Houberry Loop exceeding the
maximum allowed, a waiver is requested to block length. A
second waiver has been requested to the requirement to
project a public street to the unplatted properties to the
northwest.
Parkland Dedication Parkland dedication fees will be paid prior to the filing of
the final plat at a rate of $1,261 per lot.
Traffic Impact Analysis Not applicable
Compliant with Comprehensive Plan
(including Master Plans) and Unified
Development Ordinance
Yes
Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, with the exception of two waiver requests, the first
related to UDO Section 8.3.G Block Length requirements in
Suburban Context Zones and the second related to UDO
Section 8.3.E.3.a Street Projections.
Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the waivers and the
Preliminary Plan.
Supporting Materials
1. Waiver Request
2. Applicants Supporting Information
3. Waiver Exhibit
4. Vicinity Map and Aerial
5. Preliminary Plan
Preliminary Plan
for
Brewster Pointe Phase III
PP2021-000012
Page 35 of 44
SUBDIVISION WAIVER REQUESTS
The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations
contained in the UDO except for the following waiver requests:
UDO Section 8.3.G.2 ‘Blocks’ (Block Length for Suburban) - Per the requirements
of this section, block length should be a maximum of 1,200 feet for areas designated as
Suburban on the Thoroughfare Plan Functional Classification and Context Class Map.
As shown in the attached waiver exhibit, the first waiver request is for the block length
along the outside of Houberry Loop. This distance is approximately 1,539 feet, which
exceeds the maximum block length by 339 feet. The applicant is requesting this waiver
as their intention is to protect the existing natural drainageway to the northwest and an
existing pond to the southwest. The applicant states that creating a break in the block
length would disturb these natural features.
UDO Section 8.3.E.3.a ‘Street Projections’ – Per the requirements of this section,
when a public street is provided internal to the platting property (in this case, Houberry
Loop) and adjoining areas are not platted, the platting subdivision shall provide street
projections to such areas by projecting a public street at intervals no fewer than the
maximum block length along the perimeter boundary of the subdivision. A possible
design option is shown in a blue hatched area on the attached waiver exhibit. Strict
adherence to this requirement would result in the same disturbance upon the natural
area as described in the waiver request to block length. The applicant states the design
option shown on the exhibit is not compatible with the site design of the subdivision.
In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and
Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver:
1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such
that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of
the reasonable use of his land;
There are special circumstances and conditions that would prevent a street projection. The
applicant’s waiver exhibit and preliminary plan show the approximate limits of the existing
100-year storm water limits and the limits of the existing pond. In addition to this, the
drainageway crosses under W.S. Phillips Parkway to the northeast through a large culvert.
These conditions surround Houberry Loop on three sides, making it very difficult to extend
a public street through.
2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant;
The applicant has stated that granting the waivers are necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of property rights of not only this landowner, but also that of the adjacent
property owners. Substantial amounts of the adjacent property would have to be used
towards continuing the street, thus limiting the overall developable area.
Page 36 of 44
3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering
this chapter; and
The granting of these waivers would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare of other properties in the area as this development will comply with all other
standards and requirements found in the Unified Development Ordinance.
4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this
chapter.
These waivers will not have a negative effect on the orderly subdivision of land as the
subject tract is still proposing to continue Etonbury Avenue to the northwest, which will
eventually connect into Barron Cut-Off Road. The Etonbury Avenue extension is on the
western edge of the existing pond and drainageway, staying out of the limits and not
causing any disturbance. The unplatted properties to the north currently have frontage on
Barron Cut-Off Road.
Page 37 of 44
Brewster Pointe III Subdivision - Waiver Request
Waiver to Section 12-8.3.G. Blocks. 2. Block Length
Justification for Waiver:
The requested waiver is for the creation of a block 1,539 feet in length which exceeds the
maximum block length of 1,200’. This block is located on the northwest side of Brewster Drive.
1. Special Circumstances: Explain if there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivisions will deprive the applicant
of the reasonable use of his land. .
The existing constraints on the tract make it difficult to project a street east and west to
break the block length on Houberry Loop. There is an existing natural drainageway to the northwest and existing pipeline to the north along W.S. Phillips, and an existing pond to the southwest that make breaking the block length difficult for this tract.
2. Property Rights: Explain why the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The waiver will preserve the property rights of the landowner because it does not put additional constraints on a difficult tract to develop. This tract is extending two minor
collectors, it has an existing drainageway on the northwest property line and a pipeline
along the north property line, adding another street would restrict this property even
more so than it already is. 3. No Detriments: Explain how the granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City
in administering subdivision regulations.
The granting of the waiver for this development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property as the development will comply with all other standards and requirements. The proposed block length exceeds the
required maximum block length by less than 10%.
4. Orderly Subdivision: Explain how the granting of this waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
The granting of this waiver will not affect the subdivision of other land since the block
is within this development and does not have any effect on subdivision of other land.
The adjacent properties all have access to a public street.
Page 38 of 44
Brewster Pointe III Subdivision - Waiver Request
Waiver to Section 12-8.3.E.3. Street Projection – Justification for Waiver:
The requested waiver is for street projection from Brewster Pointe III to unplatted property to the
northwest.
1. Special Circumstances: Explain if there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivisions will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. .
Strict application of the ordinance will result in the connection of a public street across
an existing drainage way that runs along the northwest property of the Brewster Pointe III Subdivision. This would involve disturbing a natural drainage way between the Brewster Pointe III Subdivision and the adjacent tracts.
2. Property Rights: Explain why the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the applicant. The waiver will preserve the property rights of the adjacent properties, one of the adjacent properties are long narrow tracts. Projecting a public street to these tracts would require a substantial amount of the tract for public right of way, which would
limit the developable area for the tract.
3. No Detriments: Explain how the granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
The granting of the waiver for this development will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property as the development will comply with all other standards and requirements. 4. Orderly Subdivision: Explain how the granting of this waiver will not have the effect of
preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the
provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. The granting of this waiver will not affect the subdivision of other land since the adjacent tracts all have frontage along Barron Cutoff Road. The Brewster Pointe III Subdivision will also be extending Etonbury Avenue to the northwest.
Page 39 of 44
4 3 2 1
8
1
2
3
4
5
9
6
10
TRADEWIND DRIVE
ETONBURYAVENUEBRAMBER DRIVECOMMON AREA 2AND PRIVATEDRAINAGE EASEMENT
FOR STORMWATERDETENTION HOUBERRY LOOPHOUBERRY LOOPBREWSTER DRIVE
TRADEWIND D
R
I
V
E
BRAMBER DRIVEPUBLIC ALLEYETONBURY AVETRADEWIND DRIVECASTLEGATE II SEC 102
12107/123
CASTLEGATE II SEC 107
13037/274BREWSTER POINTE PH 114439/147WS PHILLIPS PKWY1
2
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
BREWSTER DRIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
LOT 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15
16
17
18 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 30 31 32 33 34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
109
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
COMMON AREA 10.185 AC.
COMMON AREA 2 & Pr. DE0.053 AC.COMMON AREA 3 & Pr. DE0.055 AC.
COMMON AREA 5 & PRIVATEDRAINAGE EASEMENT (Pr. DE)7.087 AC.
HOUBERRY LOOP
COMMON AREA 4 & Pr. DE0.055 AC.BREWSTER DRIVE
19
2
1
26
4 3 2 156789
6
789141312 11
151617 10
16
PUBLIC UTILITY, ACCESSEASEMENT ANDCOMMON AREA12107/123
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
www
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:
BLOCK EXHIBIT
BREWSTER POINTE III
SUBDIVISION
30.86 ACRES - 88 LOTS
ROBERT STEVENSON LEAGUE, A-54
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS
SCALE: AS SHOWNMAY 2022
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Rountree Development, LTD
3515 Longmire Drive, Suite B PMB 341
College Station, TX 77845
(979)-690-7117
SURVEYOR:
Kerr Surveying, LLC409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195TBPELS FIRM # 10018500
Page 40 of 44
Page 41 of 44
Page 42 of 44
4 3 2 1
1
2
3
4
5
9
6
10
TRADEWIND DRIVE
ETONBURYAVENUEBRAMBER DRIVECOMMON AREA 2AND PRIVATE
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
FOR STORMWATERDETENTION HOUBERRY LOOPHOUBERRY LOOPBREWSTER DRIVE
TRADEWIND DR
I
V
E
BRAMBER DRIVEPUBLIC ALLEYETONBURY AVETRADEWIND DRIVECASTLEGATE II SEC 102
12107/123
CASTLEGATE II SEC 107
13037/274BREWSTER POINTE PH 114439/147WS PHILLIPS PKWY1
2
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
BREWSTER DRIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
LOT 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15
16
17
18 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 30 31 32 33 34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
109
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
COMMON AREA 10.185 AC.
COMMON AREA 2 & Pr. DE0.053 AC.COMMON AREA 3 & Pr. DE0.055 AC.
COMMON AREA 5 & PRIVATE
DRAINAGE EASEMENT (Pr. DE)7.087 AC.
HOUBERRY LOOP
COMMON AREA 4 & Pr. DE0.055 AC.BREWSTER DRIVE
19
2
1
26
4 3 2 156789
6
789141312 11
151617 10
16
PUBLIC UTILITY, ACCESSEASEMENT ANDCOMMON AREA12107/123
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
www
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:
PRELIMINARY PLAN
BREWSTER POINTE III
SUBDIVISION
30.86 ACRES - 88 LOTS
ROBERT STEVENSON LEAGUE, A-54
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS
SCALE: AS SHOWNMAY 2022
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Rountree Development, LTD
3515 Longmire Drive, Suite B PMB 341
College Station, TX 77845
(979)-690-7117
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
30.86 ACRES - 88 LOTS (7.435 ACRES COMMON AREA)
SURVEYOR:
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
TBPELS FIRM # 10018500
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
W
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
K
W
Y
BREWSTE
R
D
R
HAILES LNKINNERSLY LNWARKWORTH LNET
O
N
B
U
R
Y
D
R
ES
K
E
W
D
RSPRING BREEZE DRBREWSTER DRBARRON CUT OFF RDPage 43 of 44
WS PHILLIPS PKWYBARRON CUT-OFF ROAD
CHINOOK WAY
PRELIMINARY PLAN
BREWSTER POINTE III
SUBDIVISION
30.86 ACRES - 88 LOTS
JOHN H JONES LEAGUE, A-26
BRYAN, BRAZOS, TEXAS
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
LOT TABLE
BLOCK & LOT #LOT AREA (SF)25' SETBACK LOT WIDTH(FT)LOT DEPTH (FT)
BLOCK 1, LOT 1 7547.34 78.00 105.00
BLOCK 1, LOT 2 5783.00 55.00 105.00
BLOCK 1, LOT 3 5960.00 55.00 108.00
BLOCK 1, LOT 4 6150.00 55.00 112.00
BLOCK 1, LOT 5 6882.00 60.00 115.00
BLOCK 1, LOT 6 6900.00 60.00 115.00
BLOCK 1, LOT 7 6900.00 60.00 115.00
BLOCK 1, LOT 8 6325.00 55.00 115.00
BLOCK 1, LOT 9 6325.00 55.00 115.00
BLOCK 1, LOT 10 8527.00 55.00 115.00
BLOCK 2, LOT 1 8665.00 75.00 124.00
BLOCK 2, LOT 2 7222.00 60.00 120.00
BLOCK 2, LOT 3 7205.00 60.00 120.00
BLOCK 2, LOT 4 7207.00 60.00 120.00
BLOCK 2, LOT 5 7208.00 60.00 120.00
BLOCK 2, LOT 6 7210.00 60.00 120.00
BLOCK 2, LOT 7 9076.00 80.00 120.00
BLOCK 3, LOT 1 8290.00 75.00 120.00
BLOCK 3, LOT 2 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 3, LOT 2 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 3, LOT 3 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 3, LOT 4 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 3, LOT 5 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 3, LOT 6 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 3, LOT 7 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 3, LOT 8 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 3, LOT 9 7979.00 72.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 1 7487.00 84.00 131.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 2 6602.00 55 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 3 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 4 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 5 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 6 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 7 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 8 7225.00 63.00 121.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 9 6633.00 55.00 121.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 10 6633.00 55.00 121.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 11 6633.00 55.00 121.00
LOT TABLE
BLOCK & LOT #LOT AREA (SF)25' SETBACK LOT WIDTH(FT)LOT DEPTH (FT)
BLOCK 4, LOT 12 6633.00 55.00 121.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 13 6623.00 55.00 121.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 14 6467.00 54.00 118.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 15 12402.00 53.00 148.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 16 9719.00 53.00 116.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 17 7012.00 55.00 132.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 18 9041.00 70.60 132.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 19 8159.00 70.60 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 20 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 21 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 22 6600 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 23 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 24 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 25 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 26 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 27 6586.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 28 7952.00 58.00 115.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 29 6553.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 30 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 31 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 32 6553.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 33 7826.00 55.00 112.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 34 13513.00 54.00 122.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 35 7595.00 55.00 118.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 36 6690.00 55.00 121.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 37 6634.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 38 6564.00 55.00 119.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 39 6494.00 55.00 117.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 40 6424.00 55.00 116.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 41 6353.00 55.00 115.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 42 6283.00 55.00 114.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 43 6213.00 55.00 112.00
BLOCK 4, LOT 44 7560.00 71.00 111.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 1 8159.00 71.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 2 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 3 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 4 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 5 6600.00 55.00 120.00
LOT TABLE
BLOCK & LOT #LOT AREA (SF)25' SETBACK LOT WIDTH(FT)LOT DEPTH (FT)
BLOCK 5, LOT 6 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 7 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 8 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 9 8088.00 70.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 10 8088.00 70.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 11 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 12 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 13 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 14 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 15 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 16 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 17 6600.00 55.00 120.00
BLOCK 5, LOT 18 8159.00 71.00 120.00
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
www
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:
SCALE: AS SHOWNMAY 2022
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
Trent Thomas, RoundtreeDevelopment, LTD
3515 Longmire Drive, Suite B PMB341
College Station, TX 77845
(979)-690-7117
SURVEYOR:
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
TBPELS FIRM # 10018500
30.86 ACRES - 88 LOTS (7.435 ACRES COMMON AREA)
Page 44 of 44