Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/13/1999 - Regular Agenda - Parks Board1. Call to Order 2. Hear Visitors 3. Pardon — Consider request for absence of member from meeting. 4. Oath of Office for New and Returning Parks Board Members — Chris Barzilla, Bill Davis, and John Crompton (Alternate). 5. Approval of minutes from Special Meeting of Tuesday, May 25, 1999 and Public Hearing/Regular Meeting of Tuesday, June 8, 1999. 6. Discussion and possible action for community park. 7. Discussion and possible action concerning Madeley Park. 8. Discussion and possible action on the surfacing of the jogging track at Rock Prairie Elementary School. 9. Discussion of the amount of tax dollars that go to economic development. 10. Discussion and possible action on additional lights at A&M Consolidated High School tennis courts. 11. Discussion and possible action on the design process for Veterans Park and Athletic Complex. 12. Discussion of the Recreation, Park, and Open Space Master Plan. 13. Presentation and Discussion of the NRPA (National Recreation and Park Association) agency accreditation program. 14. Discussion of Jim Baker's property in conjunction with Parkway Park. 15. Consent Items: — Capital Improvement Report — Discussion of next meeting date and agenda 16. Adjourn The building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (409) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website http://www.ci.colleae- station.tx.ms and Cable Access Channel 19. Staff Present: Eric Ploeger, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation; Curtis Bingham, Parks Operations Superintendent; Kris Startzman, Board Secretary. Board Members Present: Sarah Birkhold; John Nichols; Bill Davis; Glen Davis; John Crompton, Alternate. Board Members Absent: Chris Barzilla, Chair; George Dresser, Co -Chair; Susan Allen. Guests: Ray Holliday, 1700 Emerald Parkway, College Station, Texas. In the absence of Chris Barzilla, the Board nominated Sarah Birkhold as Chairman. 1. Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. 2. Hear Visitors: Ray Holliday introduced himself as a Landscape Architect in College Station. He mentioned that he would like to become more involved in the community and wanted to sit in and listen to the board meeting. 3. Pardon — Consider Request for Absence of Members from Meeting: John Crompton made a motion to accept, as excused, the absences of Board members, Chris Barzilla and George Dresser. John Nichols seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed 5-0. 4. Oath of Office for New and Returning Park Board Members: Bill Davis and John Crompton took and swore to uphold the Oath of Office to the Parks and Recreation Department. Note: Chris Barzilla and George Dresser will be sworn in at a later Board meeting. 5. Approval of Minutes from Special Meeting of Tuesday, May 25, 1999, and Public Hearing/Regular Meeting of Tuesday, June 8,1999: John Crompton made a motion to approve the minutes from Special Meeting of Tuesday, May 25, 1999. John N. seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed 5-0. John N. made a motion to approve the minutes from Public Hearing/Regular meeting of June 8, 1999, pending the correction of the spelling of the name of one of the visitors, Kathleen Kenefick. Sarah Birkhold seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed 5-0. Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Tuesday, July 13, 1999 Page 1 of 5 6. Discussion and Possible Action for Community Park: Eric said that this was an item from the 1998 bond election at which $500,000 was approved for a possible community park. There are no specifics as to what would be put in the park or where it would be, but because of population growth to the south, the south is the area the Department is considering. The Department also has between $250,000 to $300,000 for an additional cemetery site. Eric said that the goal was not to pick out a site that night, but to get the disposition of the Board. The Department will have a staff meeting with the City Manager and department heads later in the month, and expects to go to the City Council in August with a recommendation to the Council. Eric went over the map of potential community park sites (see attachment). Bill asked if the Department could use park land dedication funds for this project. Eric answered that this would be a community park and that the Department would not be able to use park land dedication funds —according to the Park Land Dedication Ordinance, those funds can only be used for neighborhood park projects. The sources of funding for this project would be by bond issues and/or by matching grants from the state. John N. asked if the Board would be involved in the discussion of a cemetery. Eric said probably not —the City has a Cemetery Committee that reports directly to the City Council. Eric said that he tried to keep the park's criteria within the City limits. He went on to say that if none of the sites presented worked out, the Department may look at purchasing land outside the City limits. The Department has bought parks this way in the past (for instance, Southwood Athletic Park was outside the City limits when it was purchased). Bill would like to see the Department's efforts be complementary with the Greenways Master Plan. Eric instructed the Board to look at the potential sites and give its input. Based on the discussion, potential park sites B, D, and H were options that the Board wanted to look at. Potential park sites D, C, A, G, and F may not be options because of their distance from sewer and utility lines. John N. would object to the Department looking further south than Greens Prairie Road (outside the City limits). Eric will relay the Board's suggestions to Steve Beachy and the City Manager. 7. Discussion and Possible Action Concerning Madeley Park: Eric said that there were two pieces of property that the Department had been considering purchasing for Madeley Park (in the Chimney Hill area). He mentioned that Steve had gone to the City Council in July and presented the possibility of buying one of the pieces of property. The City Council had indicated to him that they weren't interested in buying the land. Eric said that the City had $150,000 of Community Development funds to buy additional property, but it will not be used to purchase this land for Madeley Park. John N. asked what would happen to the Community Development funds. Eric said that they would probably be redirected into other uses. He went on to say that there was also $50,000 approved in the 1998 bond issue for the development of Madeley Park. From the perspective of the Finance Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Tuesday, July 13, 1999 Page 2 of 5 Director, the bond proposals may be written so that the money can be redirected —possibly to another park. John N. suggested that the Board revisit this issue on a future agenda. He asked about writing a letter to the Madeley's (who donated Madeley Park) to inform them that the Department will not be developing the park. Eric said that the Madeley's were no longer living, but after five (5) years, if the Department doesn't develop a park on this land, it will contact the A&M Methodist Church. (Note: this land was donated to the City on the contingency that if the City didn't develop it in five (5) years time, it would become the property of the A&M Methodist Church). Eric will discuss this with Steve, and it will be on a future agenda. S. Discussion and Possible Action on the Surfacing of the Jogging Track at Rock Prairie Elementary School: This was an item that was discussed during the April Board meeting. Eric said that the Parks Department has not heard anything from the School District yet, but has decided to go forward with putting in concrete on the areas that are badly eroded. The Department will try to complete this project in August, before the school year starts. Eric said that the Board had talked about doing a shared project cost with the School District. The Board talked about alternatives to putting rubberized cushioning on the track. Eric stressed that the Department is only looking at replacing the areas that have erosion problems. He said that putting concrete down does not close the door to the possibility of adding rubberized surfacing at a later date. John N. asked if the School District would share the cost. Glen asked what the cost would be to place rubberized surfacing on the areas of erosion. Eric said that he would have to calculate the costs. Bill asked if the agreement that the Parks Department has with the School District is in writing. Eric said that there was an agreement for the development of the park, but he is not sure if it covers maintenance. Bill said that if the Department decides to repair the track, it should go over the agreement with the School District first. Eric said that he would look into this and come back to the Board with a report. 9. Discussion of the Amount of Tax Dollars that go to Economic Development: Eric said that this was an item that Chris Barzilla had requested to be on the agenda. John C. made a motion to table this item until the next Board meeting. Bill D. seconded the motion. All agreed, and the motion passed 5-0. 10. Discussion and Possible Action on Additional Lights at A&M Consolidated High School Tennis Courts: Eric said that this was another item that Chris Barzilla had requested to be on the agenda. Eric has been in contact with Larry Patton with Britt Rice Electric Company, who is working to get cost estimates for six (6) tennis courts. Eric should have these estimates by the next Board meeting. 11. Discussion and Possible Action on the Design Process for Veterans Park and Athletic Complex: Eric said that it has been the Department's intention to start working on a Veterans Park and Athletic Complex Master Plan effort once the Recreation, Park, and Open Space Master Plan was complete. He mentioned that Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Tuesday, July 13, 1999 Page 3 of 5 the City Council adopted this Master Plan at the July 8th Council meeting. Eric said that the Department is ready to start work on Veterans Park and Athletic Complex. He said that the Department has met with City Council member James Massey to discuss the property (the old Texas Instrument plant) to the east that is owned by Texas A&M University. The Department has talked about the use of this property. They discussed the possibility of having the facility set up for the public to visit some of their wildlife collection materials. They would also like to put up a fence that would allow public access to nature trails. The Department has also met with a group of veteran organizations that have decided to put a memorial at Veterans Park and Athletic Complex. John C. asked about the timetable for the project. Eric responded that Glen and John N. were appointed to the Veterans Park and Athletic Complex Naming and Conceptual Plan subcommittee at the September 1998 Board meeting. John C. asked to be placed on the subcommittee as well. Glen made a motion to add John C. to the subcommittee for the Veteran's Park and Athletic Complex Conceptual Plan. John N. seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed 5-0. Glen asked if the Department needed to bring in other people and organizations to serve on the subcommittee, or if these people should come as representatives from their respective areas. Eric said that it would be the role of the subcommittee to appoint members. Eric said that with this master plan, there would be no consultant involved, but the Department does have funds to hire a design firm. The subcommittee will decide when this needs to take place. John N. added that there would be a committee formed, consisting of several groups, to come up with some conceptual ideas. 12. Discussion of the Recreation, Park, and Open Space Master flan: This was discussed in item #11. 13. Presentation and Discussion of the NRPA (National Recreation and Park Association) Agency Accreditation Program: Eric said that the Parks Department has contracted a summer intern, who is a Recreation and Parks student, to work on the feasibility of the Parks Department becoming an accredited Parks and Recreation Department, a program through the National Recreation and Park Association. The intern will submit a report to the Department of her findings. Eric went on to say that the City of Plano is the only accredited parks department in the state —there are only 21 parks departments that are accredited in the nation. Eric said that this would help the Department locate areas that need improvement. John N. would like the report to include some of the benefits of becoming accredited. Eric said that the completion of the Recreation, Park, and Open Space Master Plan is critical to the success of accreditation. 14. Discussion of Jim Baker's Property in Conjunction with Parkway Park: Eric said that there was a letter from the City Manager concerning this item in the Board packets. He went on to say that this item was originally discussed in the Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Tuesday, July 13, 1999 Page 4 of 5 September 1998 Board meeting. It was put on the current agenda to keep the Board informed. Eric went over a map showing the Baker properties. He said last September, Mr. Baker wanted to sell several lots adjoining Parkway Park, including his home, to the City to add to the park. There was question as to the ownership of the north end of what has been presumed to be part of the park. The Board had then voted not to accept his offer. Mr. Baker was notified of this, and has continued his claim of ownership to the property. The City has decided that 1) if Mr. Baker will release all claim to the portions of property in Parkway Park, the City will work with him to allow a right-of-way through one of his remaining lots, so that it can be sold, and a house can be put on it; and 2) work be done to subdivide a corner of the property so that it can be sold as a separate lot. Bill asked what the basis of Mr. Baker's ownership claim was. Eric said that the City's legal staff has looked into it, and other than the fact that Mr. Baker had claimed to have paid taxes on the property, they couldn't find any evidence that the property was owned by Mr. Baker. Eric said that the City is trying to resolve this for everyone's benefit. 15. Consent Items: Capital Improvement Report: Eric said that the new Teen Center is coming along well and is expected to open September ISt. Discussion of Next Meeting Date and Agenda: John C. would like to review the draft budget before it goes to City Council for approval. John N. would like to have a Veterans Park and Athletic Complex report. John N. and Bill will not be able to attend the Board meeting on August Ie-Kris will call Board members for a quorum or suggest alternative meeting dates. John N. would like to revisit the Department goals on a future agenda. 16. Adjourn: Glen made a motion to adjourn. John N. seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Parks & Recreation Board Regular Meeting Tuesday, July 13, 1999 Page 5 of 5 From: "Ornoser,George" <g-drenner@tamu.ndu> To: 'Kris Starbcmnn'<kstortznman@cd.noUege-statinn.tx— Date: Thu, Jul 8. 1999 513PK8 Subject: Pardon | request mpardon (excused absence) from the Parks and Recreation Board meeting ofJuly 13.1QQQ.K8ywife and | will boononextended trip to Turkey from July 13tmJuly J7.Please thank the Board for their consideration ofthis matter. George B.Dresser, July 8.1QQQ. JLII,-13-99 TUE 12:16 m WALLER COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT DAVID J. PIWONKA, CTA, RPA, CHIEF APPRAISER CECIL M. Roaraws, CTA, RPA, AssivANT CHIEF APPRAISER TO. PARK BOARD P,O. BOX 159 6301 SOUTH STADIUM LANE KATY, TEXAS 77492.0159 TELEPHONE (281) 396-6100 WATS LINE 800-392.4109 FAX LINE (281) 396-6111 JULY 13, 19999 I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND TONIGHT'S MEETING. MY WIFE IS OUT OF TOWN AND DO NOT HAVE ANYONE TO KEEP MY YOUNGEST DAUGHTER. CHRIS BARZILLA COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 July 9, 1999 TO: Veterans Memorial Committee FROM: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Meeting Notes Thanks, once again for your time and interest in developing a veterans memorial for our area. I have enclosed the notes from the last meeting that Kris Startzman prepared. Also, an updated mailing list is included for your convenience. Please share this information with any one who may be interested in the project. Dr. Carter will let us know when the next meeting will be held. The City of College Station supports this effort and would like to see it happen in the new Veterans Park & Athletic Complex. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the site or would like to tour the property. I will assist in any manner to facilitate the process. copies: Skip Noe, City Manager Parks & Recreation Board Home of Texas A&M University Staff Present: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks & Recreation; Eric Ploeger, Assistant Director; Pete Vanecek, Sr. Parks Planner; Kris Startzman, Staff Assistant. Parks & Recreation Board Member Present: John Nichols. Brazos County Organizational Representatives: Floyd Wells, Commander, Disabled American Veterans, Chapter 200 Bruce Chabot, President, Brazos Valley Chapter of National Sojourners Deborah Jasek, Chair, College Station Historic Preservation Committee P. David Romei, Executive Director, Arts Council of Brazos Valley Interested Citizens: Dr. Craig Carter Marvin E. Whittaker Calvin Boykin The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Steve Beachy introduced himself and the Park staff. Steve asked that the group go around the room and introduce themselves as well. Steve informed the group that they would receive copies of the minutes from the meeting once they we're completed. He mentioned that he had seen an article in Memorial Dav that brought to mind some of the discussions that had arisen regarding Veteran's Park and Athletic Complex. Steve said that the City purchased this land in 1998. It was bought for the purpose of having a large athletic park to serve soccer, softball, and similar sports. The City also felt that this park was going to be a key community site. He mentioned that the City was looking for a park site that was relatively flat and open, and that was centrally located with good visibility and access to the community. Veteran's Park and Athletic Complex is on the extreme northern part of College Station. Steve said that Veteran's Park & Athletic Complex is in the College Station city limits and in the Bryan School District (centrally located to the community). Steve went over a chart with the park's site characteristics. He said that this park would have softball and soccer fields and probably a pavilion, tennis courts, RV parking area, and trails. Steve said that $2 million dollars was approved in the 1998 bond election to start construction of the park. He said that this money will build softball fields, soccer fields, and an entranceway. The Parks Department will complete the project over a period of years. John Nichols served on the subcommittee that was appointed by the Parks & Recreation Board to come up with recommendations for naming the park. John talked about the "1 concept behind naming the park. He said that there had been some discussion of ' dedicating a space in the park where there could be a monument or visual feature, with a presentation area or small pavilion (small plaza with landscaping). Another idea was to set aside a quiet area in the park. Steve said that there have been a lot of ideas, but nothing has been decided yet. Steve said that a committee will need to be developed to work on a memorial, and that the following questions should be asked before deciding on a memorial: 1. What should the memorial be? 2. Where should the memorial be located? 3. Who should be honored at the memorial? 4. How do we get it done? 5. How much money will be spent on the memorial? Deborah Jasek said that it would be a good idea to have a place that is away from everything else, where one could sit down on park benches and reflect. She suggested that one way to honor a lot of people would be to do what the women's memorial has done. They have set up a database and are attempting to document every woman that served in the armed services or in the auxiliary services. They created a page for all of those women, where one could read their stories. She said that we could do this in addition to a memorial this way it could personalize the memorial for a lot of people. Marvin Whittaker mentioned that a good idea would be to have the memorial where it is visible to a lot of people. He went on to say that the purpose of this park is to serve the region, and this is where a memorial is going to get the most visibility. This regional park will attract a large number of people (including young people). Bruce Chabot asked if the memorial will apply to all veterans. Calvin Boykin asked if a database was created, would it only include the resident veterans in the community? Marvin said that there is. a large veteran population in Brazos County alone --over 8,000. Rather than placing a statue made of metal in the park, Bruce Chabot suggested planting a memorial tree. This would not be expensive to do. The tree could also be accompanied by a metal marker or legend. Since the park is outdoors, it could be the Veteran's Park and Athletic Complex Memorial Tree. Marvin suggested a bronze creation of. the .American Flag with the seal of each of the services engraved into the drapings of the flag. This would complement a memorial tree. He also suggested getting the children of the community involved in the process by holding a contest to see what they would deem to be appropriate for a memorial. He suggested getting a committee together from people in the park district, veterans groups, and various other organizations. The Parks & Recreation Board could take a look at those groups or organizations, and get with someone that is familiar with the art aspect of the project. A committee could organize scholarships and let the community get involved with the process. David Romei said that the amount of money the City will spend on the memorial will determine, to a large extent, what kind of memorial there will be. He went on to say that if the City is going to do something in a public park, it could put a tree at the entrance, but if it wants a quiet location, where people can sit down and reflect, and educate themselves about the wars, he can envision big plaques on a great granite wall with an eternal flame. He said that we could always add on to this. He went on to say that this way, the City can include all branches of the service, and it can be one nation. We could do this once we know the budget and the location where we want to put the memorial. David said that there is a committee (Art in Public Places) you can get that information to. Steve said that the group cannot solve what the memorial should be at this point, but the question is how to get this done to make it successful. He said that there has to be feedback from the people that we are serving. He went on to say that there needs to be some kind of organizational structure created that would have representation from different organizations and that the work of this group would fall under several categories, such as publicity, design, and research. That will take some time to do. Craig Carter agreed, that to form the committee would have to be the first step. He mentioned that he had helped dedicate a memorial in his home town in Indiana where eight men had died in the Vietnam War —each of their individual faces was inscribed into the granite. He said that any memorial would honor veterans regardless of how they served in peace and war, but the VFW had hoped to set a goal to build a memorial honoring each person who had died in a war who was from the Brazos County. He said that this would require a lot of research. He suggested utilizing the Texas A&M History Department where graduate students could possibly help. John said that the park could be designed so that it has the basic infrastructure and central features and won't close out development in years to come. Marvin urged involving the youth and getting the community involved. John asked Calvin what he knew about fund raising for these things. Calvin said that we couldn't depend on the $2 million (from the bond election) from fhe City. Steve said that the $2 million has been dedicated to getting started on the park. He went on to say that the City may be able to provide some financial support, but they could probably not do it all. He went on to say that the City does support public art and has budgeted for it. John said that there are grant foundations for nature trails, and that Texas Parks and Wildlife can match funds. Steve said that one of the keys to getting grants is matching them. David asked Steve what he thought would be the total amount spent once the park was finished? Steve estimated $10 million. David said that a rule is to try to put 1% of the money spent on a project towards public art. $10 million would mean that we could spend $100,000 on a work of art. Marvin suggested several sources where the City can request help. Steve mentioned that Jodie Hoyak, with Memorial Funeral Chapel, was involved with putting a memorial together in another county. He passed around the information and pictures of the memorial. Steve said that from the standpoint of the Parks Department, he would prefer that the department support a committee, rather than try to run it. He said that if the VFW would like to take the lead with this project, then the Parks Department can offer administrative and logistics support (have meetings at the department, assist with mail -outs, etc.). He suggested making the VFW in charge of assembling the players and having this group provide support to make it all happen. Everyone was in favor of this. David agreed with Craig, that it is nice to personalize a sculpture of this magnitude, but the minute that you do that, you exclude some people. He compared it to giving a speech and not naming everyone who helped you. He said that it is the same with public art — the more inclusive you are, the more resources you will get. Deborah mentioned that we need to remember the Corps of Cadets at Texas A&M University when it comes to fund raising. She said that they love to do civic community work. Marvin mentioned that he would like to personally get involved with the committee and the decision making. Craig added that the VFW has already raised some money. Deborah suggested that Major Jim Ray (Texas A&M Development Foundation) might be able to help out with fund raising. Craig asked Steve what he thought the timeline would be for having something in the park. Steve said that the Parks Department is looking at three years. Floyd Wells mentioned that people will have to be educated about this. We will have to sell the idea to the public. Marvin talked about the availability of his agency's resources to help the committee. Steve asked Craig what he thought the group needed to do next. Craig responded that he would put out a plea to form a committee, spend the rest of the summer getting the committee put together, and plan on having a meeting in September and then possibly meet monthly. Steve said that we will need to figure out our process and figure out what other steps need to be taken. Steve asked, once the committee is put together, is there a need to establish a formal motion or approval, or to have a charter put together? He went on to say that this process would be good from our end and would show structure. Steve suggested getting a representative from The Eaale on the committee to help out with marketing and communications. The group talked about the importance of educating the public about veterans. Deborah mentioned that there is a new organization at Texas A&M University consisting of Veterans coming back to school after having served in the military. : Steve said that the Parks Department will send the everyone the minutes from the meeting, with an updated member listing. Steve thanked the group for coming to the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. BRAZOS COUNTY ORGANIZATIONAL REPRESENTATIVES John E. Velasquez, Commander. Brazos County Chapter VFW Post 4692 1020 Baker Bryan TX 77803 779-0276 823-7365 (fax) Floyd Wells, Commander Disabled American Veterans, Chapter 200 3805 Oaklawn Bryan TX 77801 846-8669 Bruce Chabot President, Brazos Valley Chapter of National Sojourners 1109 Neal Pickett College Station TX 77840 694-8373 e-mail: bruce.chabot@tamu.edu Jodi Hoyak Memorial Funeral Chapel 1515 South College Bryan, Texas 77801 823-8125 Dr. Craig Carter 3588 Preakness College Station, Texas 77845 845-3414 845-1794 (fax) e-mail: cncarterna.tamu.edu Les Palmer 4001 E. 29th, Suite 116 Bryan, Texas 77802 268-4242 Marvin E. Whittaker HQ 420 G EN BDE (US Army Reserve) 511 Carson Street Bryan, Texas 77801-13 98 822-9063 Ext. 310 Marvin.whittakerAusarc Emu2.army.mil Lawrence Charanza, Commander American Legion Post 159 P.O. Box 326 Bryan TX 77806-0326 589-3238 Deborah Jasek Chair, College Station Historic Preservation Committee 1007 Winding Rd. College Station TX 77840 693-0343 845-5239 e-mail: d-jasek@tamu.edu P. David Romei, Executive Director Arts Council of Brazos Valley Park Place Plaza 2501 Texas Ave. South Suite 105-C College Station TX 77840 696-2787 680-1072 (fax) e-mail: romei@romei.com INTERESTED CITIZENS Calvin Boykin 8407 Shadow Oaks - College Station, Texas 77845 693-0224 rbovkin995na,aol.com Other Astencies: Brazos County Historic Commission Reserve Officers Association Officers Wives Club TROA COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 Memorandum of Understanding May 28, 1999 TO: - Gail Jernigan FROM: Kris Startzman, Staff Assistant SUBJECT: Summer Internship - To Study the Possibility of Obtaining Accreditation I, Gail Jernigan, assume primary responsibility in preparing a report for the Parks and Recreation Department for the accreditation program administered by the Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies. Work under this agreement will commence on May 24, 1999 and end on August 17 1999. I agree to submit completed phases of work to the City of College Station Parks Department on an as -completed basis for review and revision. Phase I — Project Analysis y $250 1. Provide a determination of current requirements for agency accreditation 2. Provide a review of criteria and a determination of the appropriate point of contact for each 3. Provide a proposed schedule of work for interviews and collection of information Phase H — Collection of Data $500 1. Provide City of College Station staff interviews 2. Provide a collection of supporting materials for each criteria, 3. Provide statements of level of achievement for each criteria —` 4. Provide a specific list of deficiencies for each criteria o:80/641/memo/steve/jemigan Home of Texas A&M University .If 111.IiLl. 111 BY ", 11.1.1 nu,,.,.. .l. I'll ili, .11 ni'u u a Y,.,u,.u, n.idld, I I II. .''I aYe Lldlil"Illilull. IwAIIIBeIAIII' iC YO &&WI Ii fihlllAII, IIb Ili ; i dI.IYillIiod, I lily llnl. Ill 'tI_i I.Yll III i Liu, law,OauGiliYR.L:YNf. 4 .I �IYI -idl.J. Phase III— Executive Summary and Recommendations $250 1. Provide a statement regarding overall potential for completion of accreditation 2. Provide specific recommendations regarding whether the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department should move forward with the accreditation process 3. Provide key deficiencies identified Phase IV Provide a final report to include three (3) ring binders with tab sections $200 for each criteria, including backup documentation and specific items that need to meet stated accreditation standards. I agree to the above conditions: Gail Jerniga . / Ji"/-Z Intern o:80/641/memoAteveAemfgan r r� stin Startzman Staff Assistant City of College Station nearu u1 It tree. rauucuucu Laj/ a r" u"I lnewuue. JuNNf investments in growth have turned anTEXAS JOURNAL to service Dell Compi. old critic into a new fan, Page TS. facility in Nashville, Good Times Spur Cities to Sprout Il r c�''_ i�.''� t lei r �►.� �' :�i'Jl� ki�::�V ti l- MLS Housing -Sales Index Percentage change from year earlier (six-month moving average) 25% . 207. Is% a Y 5% 111 �x I IffIr, I I I I 1997 .1998 1999 Region by Region Percentage change in the MLS Housing -Sales Index from year-earlier period ono.Jan.—April'98 ®.Jan.—April'99 . 25% 20% 15% 10% 5x ECONOMIC FOCUS Dome Ownership Rises, But Still Trails the Nation By PATRICK BANTA S1rrJ(!f,•p,rrrr•rrJT,ri: \I'nr.r.4,r„:,.-r J,,,rnw.,t. More people are buying homes in Texas than at any time since the early 1980s. Yet the percentage of Texas house- holds that own their own dwellings is be- low where it was in 1980, and it continues In lag behind that of most olherstates. Although the slate's homeownership rate has edged up since the early 1990s, to 62.5% as of last year, it is still below the 64.3% registered in 1980, according to the Texas ARM Real Estate Center in College Station and the U.S. Census Bureau. Of the four Texas cities covered by a new Real Estate Center study —Dallas, rort Worth, San Antonio and Houston —all but Houston have experienced declining home -ownership rates during the period. (The study covers detached houses, apartments and other types of e1Z3/" a steady influx of both low-income immi- gr:utx am(t transient workers —especially in high-tech industries —who are less likely to hay homes than older, estab- lished residents. Thomas Toland, a 27-year-old law - school graduate who moved this summer from New Orleans to work for a Dallas law firm, isn't in a rush to buy a house. "I leant to make sure that I'm financially stable enough to warrant actually mak- ing such a considerable purchase," says Air. Toland. What's more, he adds, by not buying a house, "1'm more mobile. - Demographics may also explain why Texans are less likely to buy their homes than people elsewhere, say economists. The population fit the Texas cities is Younger than that in the 42 cities sur- veyed, and the median age is rising more slowly. While the median age in all four New Parks and Spruce UD Old Ones C°u A Wnu. Sr.-r J.uu Ncuu ftnundup Urban Texans, having done their best to pave paradise, are putting up parks again. Texas cities are embarking on a park - building boom, adding hike -and -bike trails, greenbelts, soccer fields and other outdoor amenities at a rate faster than anything experts have seen in decades. Among the most ambitious park pro- jects of recent years is a $73.5 million plan in Dallas to turn the mosquito -infested Trinity River flood plain into a string of lakes, parks and trails. And in San Anto- nio, voters over the past five years have set aside $65 million in pond money for parks — the first bond packages the city has ap- proved for parks since 1970. It isn't only space -hungry urbanites who are leading the new boom. College Sta- tion recently approved a bond package to buy up flood -plain land for dedicated green space, while more than a half dozen North Texas suburbs have recently built or are in the process of building new city parks. .lust two weeks ago, voters in the tiny but fast-growing burg of Allen, north of Dallas, approved S22 million in bond money for new parks —an average of about $760 for every one of its 29,000 residents. "I think there's enough data to suggest that we could be entering a golden era' of mmlicipal-park development in Texas, says Ted Siff, director of government af- fairs for the Texas office of the Trust for Public Land, a San Francisco -based park - advocacy organization. The last time Texas saw such a crop of new parks was in the postwar years of the 1950s and 1960s, when a flush economy en- abled cities to build hundreds of parks for the scores of new suburbs sprouting up across the state. Today, Texas cities are flush again, fol- lowing the state's 11th straight year of eco- nomic expansion. And residents, alarmed by suburban sprawl, are haranguing their elected officials to set aside more land for public use. "People are always more receptive to spending on parks if they're happy with their fire, police, streets and flood control Dist," says OliverB. Spellman Jr., director of the Houston Parks and Recreation De- partment. "Right now, we have an oppor- tunity." But what they're asking for, often- times, is something far different from the prototypical suburban park of yesteryear, ♦ 1 I Here are some of the bond packages approved this decade AMOUNT CITY YEAR Ian millions) Arlington 1994 5 .. s Arbngipn j997 38r , Despite all the recent spending ••- ••: ....... -• •- • • ••' . on parks, however, large differences Austin 1992 70 i remain in the amount of parkland in - ';; Austin _ 1996 97 Texas cities .:. ......... ........� ........ ., PARK ACHES PER Dallas 1998 74 CITY ACRES 1,000 PEOPLE Houston 1992 50 .:..: Austin 23208' 412 ;........ ....... ' Houslan 1997........32. .. ... .......... a .: ..... Dallas 2.1,000 21.5 Irving„ 1999 37 ,EI Paso 1475 21 �.` San Antonio 1994 41 Houston 20.537 11.0 SanAntonto „1919 24 , San,Mlanio t• ;, 7575 67 lincludes`about8,000 acres ofhotted access nalura preserve al del a aslakes sourcei. hrust for Pu6Ne Land, 1Ae Cities'- t o �o with its sluing sets, seesaws and baseball Houston's park needs for the next 20 years diamonds bounded by four paved roads. and make it easier for the city to qualify for While those are still popular, today's Tex- slate and federal park grants. The plan, ans also want more rugged pleasures, such still in its draft phase, recommends adding as rustic hike -anti -bike trails that connect 6S new parks for an additional 1.700 acres distant parks (or even cities), and even on- and expanding 16 of the 311 existing parks. touched forest lands. To develop the plan, city officials Here.'sa lonkat the park-buildingactiv- counted the number or school -aged chil- ities of a few Texas cities. dren in each neighborhood, projected fu- HOUSTON lure growth corridors, and surveyed exist- ing undeveloped green space that could be When it comes to parks, the Bayou City purchased, leased or shared. Officials are is playing catch up. I taking the plan to neighborhood groups Houstonians pay about 16 million visits this summer, and it will go before the to city parks in a year, walking and jog- maynrmd city council for final considera- ging, picnicking and playing organized iron in the fall. Costs for the first phase of sports, thanks to year-round warm flip phlnareestimated atabout S40million, weather and the fact that it takes a lung Air. Spellman says. time to drive out of the sprawling city. Yet The rily isn't wa iting for the adoption of the city has less park acreage for each res- file muster plan to begin its catching up. ident than Dallas, rort Worth or Austin, It's in the middle of an eight -year park-ren- and falls well below national averages. ovation program financed with S8Z million "We're considered park -poor here," says in bonds approved by voters in 1992 and Mr. Spellman, the Houston Parks and 1997. Recreation director. In addition to the bond -financed reno- To remedy the problem, the city is vation, the biggest current park project is preparing a citywide master plan for its the SI00 million makeover of Hermann parks, which will determine and guide Please Tura to Page T3,ColurmI 210. Staff Repan - The Tex ity compani. iting liabili power point. The una that Housto Houston-ba: n't liable $250,000 aft-: power for 14, items to spo proved by it Stan limit I, outage dam. low lawsuit (trails in thr In the It, late courts whether suf able, based cent high -co lrialjudges ing lawsuit. over service "We're t with damag ter," says lawyer wit store's owne Inc., and it Casualty Cc case. Aucha• retailer Ate Auchan': by the Tv sumers, a chemical I. power user. that gives L consumers o solute," Mr. Cases Wall The deci: in the numl utility CORI Houston law appellate co case, cust011 tergy Corp. against thet 1997 ice start Please 7 �!a TEXAS JOURNAL Cities Sprout New Parks, Spruce Up Old Ones Gbntinaed Front Pane 72 Park, a 910-acre regional park near Rice University and the Texas Medical Center south of downtown. Using funds from the city's general -improvement account and S13 million in private donations raised by the Friends of Hermann Park, a nonprofit group, the first phase of the long -needed renovation includes rebuilding the 85-year- old park's scenic reflecting pond, land- scaping the 18-hole golf course and updat- ing the park's outdoor theater. A separate $75 million fund is being used to upgrade the park's Houston Zoological Gardens. And Harris County, which has its own park system in addition to undeveloped green space used for flood control, has slated a November bond election that in- cludes $12 million for parks. DALLAS For landlocked Dallas, surrounded by suburbs, acquiring new parklands isn't usually an option. "When land is going for 5150,000 an acre, it's a little hard fortis to put money into it program to buy at those rates," says Steven Park, assistant direc- tor for the Dallas Parks and Recreation Department. So the city is mostly fixing up its exist- ing parks, concentrating an the big tourist destinations such as the Dallas Zoo and Fair Park, home of the Texas Stale Fair. Using funds from bond projects in 1995 and 1998, Dallas park officials are spending up toS10 million on the zon, adding new tiger exhibit and constructing a children's zoo. They're spending 5.10 million at Fair Park to restore Art Deco buildings and other coistruclian projects. It isn't all showcase projects; city offi- cials also are putting about 51.5 million into each of several area playgrounds, mainly to bring them into compliance with now safety regulations. The Trinity River project• rejected by voters in the 1970s, gives Dallas a rare air portunity to add new parklands through the herculean task of transforming the (haul -prone Trinity into what promoters say will he a crown jewel of lakes, parks and jugging trails close to downtown. Vot- ers last year narrowly approved $241; mil- lion in bonds In finance the project, which eventually will include a 1011 road and new flood -control levees, despite oplusilion from a broad coalition that included envi- ronmental groups that objected Wally pro- jects in the Trinity flood plain. The parks portion is expected to cost about S42 million, mainly to acquire the Great Trinity Forest, the nation's largest urban forest, and to build a visitor center, canoe launches and hiking trails in the park. Another $31.5 million is set aside for 'a 135-acre talie or chain of lakes. Both Pr to tie into another massive parks develop- ment in North Texas: the 250-mile pro- posed Trinity Trails System, which plan- ners hope eventually will connect Texas cities along the river from Dallas to the Ok- lahoma line. About 55 miles of the trail have been completed so far. AUSTIN Austin, ground zero for "smart growth" in Texas —development that seeks to avoid such urban ills as traffic and overbuild- ing —has been on a park spending spree. With 23,208 acres designated as parkland, tile city has almost doubled its park acreage since 1990. However, some of the new parkland will never see a soccer field. In 1993, the city ac- quired 7,000 acres in the Baleares Canyon- lands west of Austin for parkland, mainly to protect the habitats of several endan- gered species. But only a small portion is accessible to bicyclists and hikers, and of- ficials don't plan on traditional park devel- .t there.. Austin voters have also ap- Itri, tHl S65 million in bontfs to buy 15.0110 neres in the environmentally sensitive Ed- wards Aquifer recharge zone West of Austin, partly for traditional park use and partly for rugged hiking and camping. With proceeds front a 597.3 million No- vember bond election, Austin officials are planning mnrr traditional park develop- ment. 'file biggest is the lung -planned de- velopment of 363 acres in east Austin called the Colorado River Park, designed to serve the traditionally park -poor eastern part of the city. So far, planners have set aside $10 million to begin development of the park, velopment of Town Lake Park, along the Colorado River on the south edge of downtown. Town Lake is already the site of one of Austin's best-known features, a 10-mile hike -and -bike trail, and city offi- cials are planning to add to the trail with construction of a S21 million park on city - owned land along the river in conjunction with a new community and performance center, financed by a new 5% tax on car rentals. "People who have been around Austin for more than a decade have seen a lot of growth, "says Stuart Strong, the city Parks and Recreation Department's division manager for planning, design and con- struction. "People have decided to put the dollars down [for parklands) or face the city, like a lot of others, being overdevel- oped." SAN ANTONIO For years San Antonio has enjoyed the dubious distinction of having the least park space per 1,000 peo- ple of any major Texas city except EI Paso, with less than seven acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents. Residents have grumbled that the city's Parks and Recreation Depart- ment spends too much money on amenities for tourists, like Mar- ket Square and the River Walk, both of which it manages. This year, the de- partment will spend S3 million of its S'1b million bud- get on the River Walk alone. But the pivt ut has begun to improve fit recent years: In 19!14. voters opprovcd Sd1 million fit bond money for parks, the first time they had authorized banding for parks since 1970. They followed that up with an additional $24.2 million approved in May of this year. Now the city is on a pa rk-enhancement and pork -building to:u. ll has some 115 pro- jects in various stages of development —in - eluding adding trails and athletic fields at some sites, as well as creating more than a half -dozen new parks —compared with an average of 20 to 30 projects at any given time in the 1970s and 1980s:. "We're in a real growth mode," says Dale Branford, park projects manager for the city's Parks and Recreation Depart- ment. But even that isn't enough, lie says. Thanks to the crush of new subdivisions go- ing up, mostly in the northern stretches of town, demand continues to grow "faster than we can keep up with." EL PASO Parks in El Paso have periodically taken a back bench to other development, but city officials are planning for a park - building boom. As in most Texas cities, parkland ac- quisition fell off to nothing during the bust years of the 1980s and early '90s, and now the city has about 1,500 acres of park- land —about 30%below what a city its size should have, municipal officials say. Parks are full on weekends, and the short- age is especially acute in a city with a large Hispanic population that regularly uses parks for family and social gather- ings. In an attempt to reniedy the situation, the city adopted its first parkland -dedica- tion ordinance in 1989; it required devel- opers to set aside one acre of parkland for every 200 single-family or .125 multifam- ily housing units, or pay a fee to the city. But with demand for housing so strong, must developers j list pay the fees, cityof- ficiads say. Since the measure was re- vised in 1995, the city has added only about 20 acres of parks through the pro- gram. The program also "doesn't address the question of larger parks where you can put ball fields," says Charles Natter, director of the El Paso Parks and Recreation De- partment. To that end, city officials are preparing what they call a "Quality of Life" bond issue, with $72 million of the SIM million proposal dedicated for parks and recreation facilities. It's unclear when the measure might go before voters, but some say it is unlikely to make the Novem- ber ballot. Parks officials have ambitious plans for the money: In addition to paying for im- provements on nearly all of the city's 112 parks, they want to add rive new parks, in- cluding two regional parks of more than 100 acres each that combine a full range of sports and recreational activities. They want to build a oew sports complex, along with three new recreational centers, and improve lighting on existing ball fields. The plans also call for development of a "linear" park along lA miles of the Rio Grande that isn't part of the border with Mexico. (The rest of the riverfront is con- trolled by the U.S. Border Patrol and Letter to the Editor Behind Insurance Pool's Rate Rise Your June 9 article "Health Pool Will Raise Rates by20%" falsely implies Iharl dictated a Texas health insurance risk pool rate increase double what the pool's board of director wanted. The article quotes a perennial critic of the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI)—without rebuttal —as saying this was done solely to enrich the insurance inddstry. These inaccuracies do me an injustice and damage The Wall Street Journal's credibility in the eyes of those who know and understand the underlying law and the actual sequence of events. Here are the facts, which TDI's asso- ciate commissioner for life/health insur- ance/managed care and I both described to your reporter in considerable detail. Based on its actuary's recommenda- tion, the pool board approved a 1017. rate increase, subject to my approval. When TDI received the pool's rate filing, a staff actuary immediately noticed that it left out elements —such as claim experience and other expenses —that Texas law re- quires the pool's rates to recognize. Our actuary contacted the pool's actu- ary, who immediately acknowledged the inadvertent omission of the statutorily required elements from her rate calcula- tions. After receiving its actuary's car rested calculations, the pool board, of its own volition, withdrew its earlierrate fit-_ ink, unanimously adopted an increase of 207. and sent it to TDI for my approval. The 20% increase, which I approved, was eyholders. Contrary to your article, neither t TDI staff nor I urged or even suggest that the pool board raise its rates by 20 Ourjob is to enforce the law as given to by the Legislature. When the pool sent rates that were not calculated in aeo dance with the law, staff had a dut3 which it met —to call that deficiency The pool board° itself pulled dozam_ ................................................ its original rate recommendation the pool's vised rate self pullet mehdathn 20%rate .i I recof P. O_ Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tet. 409 764 3500 July 12, 1999 Mr. Chris Bar;eMa Chairman, College Station Parks and Recreation Board '1000 Krenek Tap Road College Station, TX 77542 Dear Mr. Barzilla; For the past few months, members of the Advisory Board have observed the existing public announcement (PA) system to be inadequate. We are asking that a new system be installed. We have experienced a significant increase in the activities held at the Center. A preliminary estimate to purchase and install a new system would be around $1,500.00. Your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. A new system would greatly enhance future activities, Thank you for your support, Respectfully, 4LcoIn Center Advisory Board Linda Preston -Shepard, President xc: Steve Beachy, Director David Gerling Lance Jackson Home of Texas A&M University 1999/2000 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION LINCOLN CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS (7 ) (Meetings are held the 1st Monday at 5:30 p.m.) Appointment expires in 2002 DEBRA THOMAS (100) 1735 Purple Martin Cove College Station, Texas 77845 (h) 690-9231 (w) 260-9416 Term nearing expiration ELEONOR J. WILLIAMS ('00) 111 Sterling Street College Station, Texas 77845 (h) 693-3645 Term nearing expiration MABELENE ROBINSON ('00) 406 Edward College Station, Texas 77840 (h) 696-8977 (w) 845-8681 Term nearing expiration Alternates A. C. CLARK (' 00) 910 Eleanor College Station TX 77840 (h) 693-8764 (w) 693-3568 Not active in the last toyer months MERILYN RUCKER (`98) 410 Edward College Station, TX 77840 (h) 696-6585 (w) 779-8541 X- 120 Net serving officially Appointment expires in 2000 REV. JOE DAN FRANKLIN (198) 1711 Laura Lane College Station, TX 77840 (h) 696-4157 Currently Serving until position filled CATHY WATSON (`98) 1403 Gramma College Station, TX 77845 (h) 696-1518 (w) 845-1811 Curently Serving until position tilled BARBARA CLEMMONS (`98) 1731 Purple Martin Cove College Station, TX 77845 (h) 690-7483 (w) 845-3425 Curently Serving anvil position filled CAROLYN WILLIAMS (198) 4614 Shoal Creek Drive College Station, TX 77845 (h) 260-9345 (w)690-7750 Curently Serving Lentil position filled July 7, 1999 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: R O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue Tel: 409 764 3500 Parks & Recreation Board Steve Beachy, Director of Parks & Recreation Items of Interest — July 1999 UPCOMMI NG SENIOR CITIZEN EVENTS: College Station, TX 77842 On July 27th, the Parks & Recreation Department and the Brazos Valley Area Agency on Aging are sponsoring "Senior Watermelon Fun" held at the Central Park Pavilion from 6:30 p.m. — 8:00 p.m. Seniors will play games and enjoy cold watermelon in celebration of National Parks and Recreation Month, Monday, July 26a' at 10:00 a.m. — Senior Advisory Committee meets at the College Station Library. Blinn College will offer a six -week course using their computer lab in Bryan on Texas Avenue (the old Townshire Shopping Center) on Friday mornings starting in September. They will offer instruction for Windows 95, the Internet and E- mail. The cost will be $45 - $60/person. Marci Rogers (Senior Services Coordinator) and Dana Albrecht (Instruction Supervisor) are working with the High School to offer computer classes in geneology on Saturday mornings. They will also offer beginner computer classes at the Lincoln Center lab on Thursdays and possibly the new Teen Center lab (once built). The cost for these classes will be minimal, due to some of the instructors being Senior Citizens volunteering their time. The movie "Rugrats" will be playing this Saturday, July loth at dusk in Central Park. Moviegoers can bring their own lawn chairs, blankets, and picnic baskets. Home of Texas A&M University 3. CY MILLER POND PROJECT: The Cy Miller pond project is coming along nicely. The overflow drain has been installed and the framework for the extended decking is in place. The top deck, railings, and benches will be installed soon. This project is being done in-house by Parks Operations and Public Works. The project should be complete within a few more weeks. 4. EVENTS AT ADAMSON LAGOON: Saturday, July 10th — Texas Super Guard Competition at Adamson Lagoon (Adamson Lagoon will not be open until 2:00 p.m.). Thursday, July 15th and Thursday, July 22nd — Family Swim Night at Adamson Lagoon from 8:00 p.m. — 10:00 p.m. Saturday, July 17t" — Christmas in July at Adamson Lagoon — Come,and visit Santa from 2:00 p.m. — 4:00 p.m. Number: Budget: Contract Amount: Project Manager: Project Design: PK9807 $400,000 $364,289 Eric Ploeger Patterson Architects Comments/Status: Qualification statements were opened February 4, 1998. A staff recommendation was sent to Council, for selection of an architect, on the February 26, 1998, Council meeting. Council accepted the recommendation of Patterson Architects of Bryan. Preliminary design was discussed at the June Parks & Recreation Board meeting. The plan was presented to Council on July 9, 1998, and staff was directed to review the plans with the Teen Advisory Board and report back to Council. The Council approved the recommendation of the Teen Advisory Board to add funding to the project during the August 27, City Council meeting. The project was bid on January 7. Bids were opened January 22, 1999, and Marek Brothers Construction, Inc., was the low bidder. The slab for the building was pored on April 7, 1999. Task N Project Design: March - November 1998 Advertisement & Award: January 1999 Completion: August 1999 Project Number: PK9505 Budget: $80,000 Contract Amount: N/A Project Manager: Peter Vanecek Project Design: In-house (Site); McClure Engineering (Bridge); Swoboda (Electrical) CIP Report o:board/cip/cip.doc 6-Jul-99 Page 1 of 3 Comments/Status: A project to provide a trail, lighting and a bridge between the new restaurants on Highway 30 (Johnny Carino's and Kona's Steak House) is under design and is expected to be bid in August 1999. Task — Project Design: Advertisement & Award: Completion: Project Dumber: Budget: $ Contract Amount: Project Manager: Project Design: August, 1999 — September, 1999 February 2000 Comments/Status: A meeting with leaders of the soccer community was held in October. This was to discuss needs and ideas to begin master plan development by the planning staff. A similar meeting with experienced members of the softball community was held. Concepts will be developed for public hearings and Parks and Recreation Board discussions. A discussion of the Master Pan process will be on the July Parks Board Agenda.. Task — Project Design: Advertisement & Award: Completion: Project Dumber: Budget: Design Contract Amount: Project Manager: Project Resign: N/A $ b5,000 $51,100 Eric Ploeger Waterscape Consultants Comments/Status: Waterscape Consultants completed a conditions report on the condition of Adamson Pool along with recommendations for renovations in May `98. Funds for renovation design were budgeted in the FY98-99 budget. The design contract was approved by the City Council on December 10, 1998. The design process began in January, 1999. Budget numbers have been produced and incorporated into the FY 2000 budget process. Task — Project Design: January - June 1999 Advertisement & Award: August - October 1999 Construction Completion:May 2000 CIP Report wboard/cip/cip.doc 6-)u1-99 Page 2 of 3 Project Number: PK9910 Budget: $ 213,000 Park Land Dedication, and 1998 Bond Funds Contract Amount: $209,140 Project Manager: Peter Vanecek Project Design: In-house Comments/Status: The site plan was approved by council during the February 11, 1999 council meeting. The project bids were be opened on April 23, 1999 and the project was awarded to Joe Boegner General Contractors of Bryan, Texas. Task — Project Design: October - March 1999 Advertisement & Award: April 1999 Completion: October 1999 Project Dumber: Budget: Design Contract Amount: Project Manager: Protect Design: PK9927 $481,000 $30,280 Eric Ploeger Holster and Associates Comments/Status: Request For Qualifications (RFQs) for an architect were received and a selection referred to the City Council during the February 11, 1999 council meeting. Holster and Associates was selected to complete the design. The project is in the preliminary design phase. Task — Project Design: March - July 1999 Advertisement & Award: August, 1999 Completion: January 2000 Project Number: Budget: Design Contract Amount: Project Manager: Project Design: PK9931 $40,000 1998 Bond $32,551 Pete Vanecek In-house Comments/Status:Replacement of fifteen lights and poles. Electric. Task — Project Design: January 1999 Advertisement & Award: March 1999 Completion: August 1999 Contract awarded to Excel CIP Report wboard/cip/cip.doc 6-)u1-99 Page 3 of 3 Project Number: Budget: Contract Amount: Project Manager: Project Design: PK9308 $29,000 1990 Bond $N/A Pete Vanecek In-house Comments/Status: Project to include irrigation, sidewalks, landscaping and brick pavers. Task — Project Design: May 1999 Advertisement & Award: August 1999 Completion: February 2000 CIP Report o:board/cip/cip.doc 6-Jul-99 Page 4 of 3 ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANTS ADMINISTRATION HOUSING PROJECTS ............... .................................. ....................... 167 6-A CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND FUND SUMMARY FY 97-98 FY 97-98 FY 98-99 FY 98-99 % CHANGE IN FY 96-97 REVISED YEAR-END BASE APPROVED BUDGET FROM ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET BUDGET FY 98 TO FY 99 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 0 $ 318,750 $ 485,181 $ 574,164 $ 574,164 REVENUES OPERATING TRANSFERS $ 604,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 0.00% INVESTMENT EARNINGS 30,597 20,000 29,000 20,000 20,000 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES $ 604,000 $ 270,000 $ 279,000 $ 270,000 $ 270,000 0,00% TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 604,000 $ 588,750 $ 764,181 $ 844,164 .4,' 844,164, 43.3E% EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS CASH ASSISTANCE $ 67,100 $ 588,750 $ 187,555 $ 844,164 $ 844,164 43.38% OTHER 51,719 0 2,462 0 0 N/A TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS $ 118,819 $ 588,750 $ 190,017 $ 844,164 $ 844,164 43.38% INCREASE (DECREASE) FUND BALANCE $ 485,181 $ (318,750) $ 88,983 $ (574,164) $ (574,164) ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 485,181 $ 0 $ 574,164 $ 0 $ 0. 186 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND This is the second year to include the Economic Development Fund in the budget document. The purpose of this fund is to account for all funds that are to be used for business attraction and retention. Revenues for the Economic Development Fund will be collected from the General, Electric, Water, Wastewater, and Sanitation Funds. The contributions from these funds will total $250,000. Investment earnings of approximately $ 20,000 are also anticipated in FY 99. The Economic Developi-nent'Funds' expenditures are comprised of "Cash Assistance" payments to various business prospects. This assistance is aimed at providing prospective businesses with start-up opportunities and give existing businesses the opportunity to expand their operations. 185 The City has $844,164 available for cash assistance in FY 99. Cash assistance for FY 99 has been allocated as follows: Economic Development Cash Assistance Organization FY 98 FY99 Universal Computer Systems 120,000 120,000 Cabletime (380 Grant) 7,555 0 Development Matching Fund 50,000 50,000 EDC/SCIC Membership 10,000 0 Future Potential 0 674,164 Total 187 555' 844 164 =` As can be seen from the table above, there is $674,164 in uncommitted funds that, if uncommitted at year end, will contribute to the fund balance to be carried over from year to year. This flexibility will give the city an opportunity to work with various new and current businesses to ensure that College Station has a diverse and vibrant economy. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUMMARY EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION REVISED ESTIMATED BASE APPROVED % CHANGE IN ACTUAL BUDGET YEAR END BUDGET- BUDGET BUDGET FROM DIVISION FY 96.97 FY 97-98 FY 97-98 FY 98-99 FY 98-99 EY 98 TO FY 99 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $ 234,322 $ 216,601 $ 198,286 $ 202,794 $ 224,307 3.56% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 335,138 406,355 406,355 418.816 427,068 5.10% DEPARTMENTTOTAL $ 569,460 $ 622,956 $ 604.641 $ 621,600 $ 651,375 4.56% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIRCATION REVISED ESTIMATED BASE APPROVED % CHANGE IN ACTUAL BUDGET YEAR END BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FROM CL ASSL'-Ir-AT!0N.... c: -: FY 9E 97 - fY 97-78 FY 97-98 FY 98-99 FY 98-99 IY 98 TO FY 99 SALARIES & BE*EFtTS $ 380,201 $ 431,628 $ 431.628 $ 420,398 $ 431,858 0.05% SUPPLIES 19,710 26,095 26,095 18,091 18,091 (30.67%) MAINTENANCE 3,929 13,593 13,593 12,607 12,607 (7.25%) PURCHASED SERVICES 165,620 149,660 131,345 167.504 185,819 24.16% CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 1.980 1,980 3,000 3,000 51.52% DEPARTMENT TOTAL $ 569,460 $ 622,956 $ 604,641 $ 621,600 $ 651,375 { 4.56% 1 PERSONNEL SUMMARY BY DIVISION REVISED BASE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET DIVISION FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 97-98 FY 98-99 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 SERVICE LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Development of Comprehensive "Business Plan" 18.315 $ 18,315 APPROVED % CHANGE IN BUDGET BUDGET FROM FY 98-99 FY 98 TO FY 99 1 2.0 0.00% I 8.5 0.00% 10.5 0.00% 168 June 18, 1999 Mr. James G. Baker Director of Information Systems College of Architecture Texas A&M University Langford Architecture Building, Room 202 College Station, Texas 77843-3137 Dear Mr. Baker, I appreciate your taking the time to meet with Steve, Jim and I to discuss the issues associated with your property on Ashburn. Most importantly, I appreciate your desire to cooperate and find a solution to this matter that meets your goals as well as the City's. The following three points represent what we all agreed could serve as the basis for settlement of the issues: 1. We will work with you to replat the property into the three lots we discussed during our meeting including the potential to provide access to Lot 40 via the abandoned right-of-way to Marstellar. We will also have to deal with any setback issues on the new triangular lot on Ashburn/Woodland to accommodate the potential for the construction of a house on the lot. Jim Callaway will work with you and/or your engineer on the issues associated with the replat. 2. You will agree to dedicate whatever interest you have in the park/disputed area to the City to be used as a park with the understanding that it. will remain a natural area through establishment of a conservation easement or other appropriate mechanism. Steve Beachy will work on the necessary documents to accomplish this part of the agreement. Jim, once again, I thank you for being willing to work to a viable solution to this matter. You can expect to hear from Jim and Steve as they move forward with this project. If you have any questions or need any clarification of the terms that have been outlined, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Ge ge K. Noe City Manager cc: p Jim Callaway Steve Beachy o:admin/correspondence/skip/baker.doc P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue Collor,? Station, TX 77342 c;: 409 764-3510 1999 Girl's 10 & Under Fast Pitch ,State Tournament June 18-20, 1999 Facts, Figures and Survey results Number of teams participating in tournament 79 Number of games played 159 Number of softball fields used 11 All 3 youth fields were used 8 adult fields were converted by temporary fences Average players per team roster 13 Estimated family/fans per team 10 Total estimated attendance 1800 Number of hours played 42 Average rooms per team 11.7 Estimated rooms used 900 Number of umpires 11 local, 34 out of town 45 Teams that had been to an ASA tournament in BCS before 45% Satisfaction rating among participating teams 99% Softballs used 288 Coaches ejected 1 Protested ruled on 6 Longest game 9 innings Shortest game 3 innings Most runs scored in a game by a team 25 Rain delay 1 hour 45 minutes � J �, � ^�: is • <�� June 19, 1999 Mr. Steve Beachy, Director C.S. Parks and Recreation College Station, TX 77840 Dear Mr. Beachy, I am definitely hoping that you don't mind getting a little feedback, about how some of the facilities under, your direction are doing, from the community standpoint! Well, the Community Vacation Bible School churches of College Station, sincerely thank God for the Lincoln Center and the Lincoln Center staff! From our planning sessions through June 7''-11a', the Lincoln Center staff worked alongside our committee to make this year's VBS even better than last year. From the perspective of the churches involved, the Lincoln Center was indispensable in making our spiritual vision a reality. There was an average of about 210 people in attendance each evening. At least 80-85% of those in attendance, were children. The majority of the children walked to the Lincoln Center. Last year, the Lincoln Center had no air conditioning in the gym. This year, the air conditioning made the atmosphere much more agreeable for the children and the senior citizens. Special thanks and commendation to the individuals from the Lincoln Center staff that we worked closest with: Lance Jackson, James Steen, Neal Donovan, and Kylie Byrtle. These four individuals, above all, were extremely helpful throughout the week of VBS, as well as during the planning stages. It was necessary to use the facilities of the St. Matthew Baptist Church for arts & crafts as well as music, as there were no more rooms available at the Lincoln Center. Therefore, if any additions are being considered, we recommend more classroom space, a quality public address system, and a "good" piano. Most importantly, however, is that the Lincoln Center allowed us to do what none of our churches could do individually — accommodate the number of people that attended. We are very grateful, and hope you are as pleased as we are that the Lincoln Center and staff are serving the community in such a wonderful manner! The Pastors and members of the College Station churches that funded the Community Vacation Bible School say Thank You! St. Matthew Baptist Church — M.O. Cooper, Pastor Pleasant Grove Baptist Church — A.C. Clark, Pastor College Hills Baptist Church — Steven Sims, Pastor Washington Chapel Baptist Church — E.E. Garvin, Pastor First United Methodist Church — Floyd Polk, Pastor Christ Holy Baptist Church — Bennett Blake, Pastor Roans Chapel Baptist Church — Sam Hill, Pastor Sincerely, 'irk gn / Sam Hill, Assistant Director Community VBS, C.S. copies to: Mayor Lynn McIlhaney College Station City Council 1 0 ,o- P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Te(: 409 764 3500 June 14, 1999 Ms. Diane Craig Executive Director Brazos Beautiful, Inc. 1 - ::✓:✓ Lriurv_r.;3t, Suit GOG Bryan, Texas 77802 Dear Diane: In 1998, the City of College Station purchased 150 acres of land located east of the bypass and between State Highway 30 and State Highway 60. This property is located contiguous to the Texas A&M University property and in close proximity to the proposed greenway for Carter Creek. The site will be developed as a major recreational park and will eventually serve as the primary location for many tournaments and other large community events. The park has been officially named Veterans Park and Athletic Complex. It will include some type of memorial for local veterans along with athletic and other leisure facilities. Softball and soccer fields, along with shelters, parking and support facilities will be developed over the next ten years. Initial funding of approximately $2.1 million was approved in the 1998 general obligation election. I am requesting that Brazos Beautiful consider this site for future plantings. The property has approximately 1802 feet of frontage on state highway 30 and approximately 1524 feet of frontage on state highway 60. It is centrally located within the community being in the College Station city limits and in the Bryan Independent School District jurisdiction. The open nature of the terrain lends itself to a variety of plantings to enhance the overall appearance of the site. Please contact me at 764-3413 if you have questions about the site or would like to view the property. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. Sinc , Steve Beachy DiPcao, of Parks & Recreation copies: Skip Noe, City Manager Tom Brymer, Assistant City Manager !/Parks & Recreation Board Home of Texas A&M University P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77542 Tel: 409 764 3500 June 15, 1999 Mr. James Massey Director Office of Facilities Coordination 201 Administration Building Texas A&M University College Station, Texas; 718043.1369- Dear James: In 1998, the City of College Station purchased a 150 acre tract of land that is situated east of highway 6 and contiguous to property owned by Texas A&M University. This tract, officially named "Veterans Park & Athletic Complex", has extensive frontage on state highways 30 and 60 and will be developed as a major regional athletic complex. We are currently seeking input from citizens, user groups and other interested parties during the preliminary design phase. One aspect that we are interested in is the potential for cooperative uses associated with the Texas A&M University property. Our site will include facilities such as soccer ,fields, adult softball fields and a group pavilion along with rest rooms, concession buildings, parking areas and -other support facilities. The site includes a dedicated Corps of Engineers wetlands reserve located along the western boundary that may provide future linkage to the proposed Carter Creek greenway. Other facilities that have been suggested include camping, trails, baseball field, veteran's memorial area and allocation for selected commercial sites that could facilitate convenience or fast food operations. I would like to discuss any issues of mutual interest related to this site at the 9am meeting on July 1st. The meeting will be in the Central Park Office, Parks Planning Conference Room. Thank you for your time and interest in this project. Sincerely, "eve taclriy 1 Director of Parks & Recreation copies: Skip Noe, City Manager Parks & Recreation Board Home of Texas A&M University June 15, 1999 Craig Carter 3588 Preaknass College Station, Texas Dear Veteran: rEM-1111,1_1 "T "I'M '2114, 013�1­' 0_0� , I., "� - - I -i" P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue cr� 77845 Tel: 409 764 3500 College Station, TX 77842 Thank you for agreeing to meet to discuss the creation of a permanent memorial. dedicated to all Brazos County veterans. The meeting is scheduled for 7:00 pm, Tuesday, June 29th at the College Station Parks & Recreation Department office in Central Park. The City of College Station is very interested in this worthy project. The City Council officially approved the name "Veterans Park and Athletic Complex" for the 150 acre site that was purchased last year. The new park is centrally located in the community with extensive frontage on University Drive and Harvey Road. It is located in the Bryan School District and in the College Station city limits. I have enclosed a location map that illustrates the new site. Please contact me at 764- 3413 if you wish to enter the property and I will make arrangements to open the gate. A list of the individuals that have been invited to the meeting is also enclosed for your information. Thanks once again for your time and interest in this project. Sincerel , C " Steve Beachy Director of Parks & Recreation copies: Skip Noe, City Manager Parks & Recreation Board Home of Texas A&M University 'Flueterans Park & Athletic Complex Texas AM University Research Center Vatarans Park & Athletic Complex (950 Acre Cite) �re erld D ogle � Ilya �/ issan eft -� F er ,Sams Fan 0+ North BRAZOS COUNTY ORGANIZATIONAL REPRESENTATIVES John E. Velasquez, Commander Brazos County Chapter VFW Post 4692 1020 Baker Bryan TX 77803 779-0276 823-7365 (fax) Floyd Wells, Commander Disabled American Veterans, Chapter 200 3805 Oaklawn Bryan TX 77801 846-8669 Bruce Chabot President, Brazos Valley Chapter of National Sojourners 1109 Neal Pickett College Station TX 77840 694-8373 Jodie Hoyak Memorial Funeral Chapel 1515 South College Bryan TX 77801 823-8125 Dr. Craig Carter 3588 Preakness College Station TX 77845 845-3414 845-1794 (fax) Les Palmer 4001 E. 29th, Suite 116 Bryan TX 77802 268-4242 Lawrence Charanza, Commander American Legion Post 159 P.O. Box 326 Bryan TX 77806-0326 589-3238 Deborah Jasek Chair, College Station Historic Preservation Committee 1007 Winding Rd. College Station TX 77840 693-0343 845-5239 P. David Romei, Executive Director Arts Council of Brazos Valley Park Place Plaza 2501 Texas Ave. South Suite 105-C College Station TX 77840 696-2787 680-1072 (fax) INTERESTED CITIZENS P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 1►11 U' � :: ►11 1�11 June 16, 1999 TO: Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services FROM: Nteve Beachy, Director of Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Pebble Hills Detention Facility The Parks & Recreation Board, at their meeting on June 8th, agreed to the following recommendations regarding the design and construction of the detention pond to be located in the park site: 1) The design should move the "pilot" channel to the east side of the detention facility to the extent feasible; 2) that the materials used to construct the detention pond (other than the poured concrete) be considered for aesthetics; and 3) that extreme care be taken to carefully protect the beneficial vegetation outside of the detention pond area during construction. This action was approved by unanimous vote with Allen, Crompton and Davis absent. Copies: Parks & Recreation Board PA.RD Staff Veronica Morgan Home of Texas A&M University o Roland Schweitzer 2802 Cimarron Ct. College Station, TX 77845-7721 June 20, 1999 Steve Beachy, Director Parks and Recreation Department City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77840-2499 Dear Steve: I am writing to thank you for the sponsoring the recent Brazos Valley Bluegrass Fesitival. My wife and I moved to the area a year ago from Boulder, Colorado. In Boulder, we were lucky enough to be able to hear bluegrass music frequently at local theater shows and festivals, but never at a free event sponsored by the city. Many of the fans of bluegrass music are also participants. Festivals bring strangers together in jam sessions. During the festival, I met and jammed with other musicians from all over the region and as a local I could brag about our city and its support of bluegrass music. I hope that you will consider sponsoring other bluegrass and acoustic music events in the future. Sincerely, Roland Schweitzer cc: Rodney CYConnor June 18, 1999 Camille E. Hailey Attorney At Law 3604 Meadow Lane Bryan, TX 77802 Dear Mrs. Hailey, Thank you for the letter commending Vera Solis and the College Station Pool staff. They believe in the spirit of customer service, and are quite skilled at making sure people have fun. I appreciate your kind comments about this exceptional group of employees. Sincerely, eo K. Noe City Manager cc. teve Beachy, Parks and Recreation Director Vera Solis, Pools Supervisor Karen Pavlinski, Human Resources Director o:\admin\correspondence\skip\haitey.doc P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel., 409 764-3510 June 18, 1999 Mr. James G. Baker Director of Information Systems College of Architecture Texas A&M University Langford Architecture Building, Room 202 College Station, Texas 77843-3137 Dear Mr. Baker, I appreciate your taking the time to meet with Steve, Jim and I to discuss the issues associated with your property on Ashburn. Most importantly, I appreciate your desire to cooperate and find a solution to this matter that meets your goals as well as the City's. The following three points represent what we all agreed could serve as the basis for settlement of the issues: 1. We will work with you to replat the property into the three lots we discussed during our meeting including the potential to provide access to Lot 40 via the abandoned right-of-way to Marstellar. We will also have to deal with any setback issues on the new triangular lot on Ashburn/Woodland to accommodate the potential for the construction of a house on the lot. Jim Callaway will work with you and/or your engineer on the issues associated with the replat. 2. You will agree to dedicate whatever interest you have in the park/disputed area to the City to be used as a park with the understanding that it. will remain a natural area through establishment of a conservation easement or other appropriate mechanism. Steve Beachy will work on the necessary documents to accomplish this part of the agreement. Jim, once again, I thank you for being willing to work to a viable solution to this matter. You can expect to hear from Jim and Steve as they move forward with this project. If you have any questions or need any clarification of the terms that have been outlined, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Ge ge K. Noe City Manager cc: 2Jim Callaway Steve Beachy o:admin/correspondence/skip/baker.doc P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel. 409 764-3510 Texas ASA State Tournament 1999 Girl's 10 & Under Fast Pitch Bryan/College Station, Texas June 18-20, 1999 Order of Finish Place . Team ..East Wins Losses Qualified to Town District 1 Texas Firestyx .. .. 9..,... ...1......... Nationals Alba . ba 25 2 Texas Angels 6 2 "A" Regionals Waco 23 3 Hustlers 6 2 "A" Regionals Lake Jackson 27 4 Orange Crush 8 2 "A" Regionals Orange 39 5 Dickinson Slammers 6 2 "A" Regionals Dickinson 31 6 Midland Dream Team 4 2 "A" Regionals Midland 26 7 Marshall Wildthings 4 2 "A" Regionals Elysian Fields 34 8 No Limit 7 2 "A" Regionals Lake Jackson 27 9 Angleton Knockouts 4 2 "A" Regionals Angleton 27 Brazos Valley Force 4 2 "A" Regionals College Station 30 Base -Bandits 3 2 "A" Regionals Baytown 16 Texas Terminators T5 3 2 "A" Regionals Belton 17 13 XLR8 5 2 "B" Regionals League City 31 Galveston Her-icanes A 4 2 "B" Regionals Galveston 36 Ultimate 4 2 "B" Regionals Abilene 11 Odessa Surge 3 2 "B" Regionals Odessa 26 17 Abilene Blue Sox 3 2 "B" Regionals Abilene 11 Friendswood Flame 3 2 "B" Regionals Alvin 31 Bellville Bullets 3 2 "B" Regionals Bellville 30 East Texas Terminators Sugarland Outlaws 3 3 2 2 "B" "B" Regionals Regionals Lufkin Sugarland 38 43 Willis Xtreme 3 2 "B" Regionals Willis 14 Little Gamblers 2 2 "B" Regionals China Springs 23 New Boston Storm 2 2 'B" Regionals New Boston 44 25 Alvins Bayou Babes 3 2 Alvin 27 Decatur Showtime 3 2 Decatur 13 Longview Summit 3 2 Longview 34 Pride 3 2 Bay City 42 SMG&L Woodlands Slammers 3 2 The Woodlands 14 TufF E-Nuff 3 2 Lake Jackson 27 B.R.A.T. Attack 2 2 Brazoria 27 Power 2 2 Peariand 27 33 Bat -Attack 2 2 Sweeny 27 Diamond Dusters 2 2 Dickinson 31 East Texas Firebirds 2 2 Whitehouse 25 Galveston Her-icanes B 2 2 Galveston 36 Ice 2 2 Angleton 27 Magic 2 2 Missouri City 43 Midland Nightmares 2 2 Midland 26 Neches River Nightmare 2 2 Groves 39 Sabine Red Hots 2 2 Kilgore 34 Santa Fe Attitudes 2 2 Santa Fe 31 Wichita Fails Vision 2 2 Wichita Falls 9 Freeport Flash 1 2 Freeport 27 Mitchell Co. Slammers Plge 1 8f 2 Colorado City 11 Quicksilver 10 1 2 Paris 44 Texas City Heat 1 2 Texas City 31 West Texas Heat'88 1 2 Midland 26 49 Brownwood All Stars 1 2 Brownwood 12 East Texas Twisters 1 2 Longview 34 Eula Icy Hot 1 2 Clyde 11 LM All Stars 1 2 Texas City 31 Pittsburg Phillies 1 2 Pittsburg 44 Texas Stix 1 2 Round Rock 18 Victoria Drillers 1 2 Victoria 20 Alief Rush 0 2 Alief 43 Fever 0 2 Port Arthur 39 Georgetown Crush 0 2 Georgetown 18 Mark C Rains & Assoc. Starz 0 2 Victoria 20 Montgomery Pride 0 2 Montgomery 14 S.L.G.S.A. Renegades 0 2 Sugarland 43 Sugarland Starz 0 2 Sugarland 43 Texas Terminators T7 0 2 Belton 17 Wylie Force 0 2 Tuscola 11 65 Awesome Storm 0 2 Smithville 19 Coleman Devil Cats 0 2 Coleman 12 Crushers 0 2 Vidor 39 Danbury Dynamite 0 2 Danbury 27 Dixie Chicks 0 2 Huntington 38 EMC Double Trouble 0 2 Porter 14 Heartbeakers 0 2 Wichita Falls 9 Hughes Springs Her-icanes 0 2 Hughes Springs 44 Lightning II 0 2 Port Neches 39 Maud Hot Stuff 0 2 Maud 44 Rage 0 2 Flower Mound 13 Rose -Rich Stampede 0 2 Rosenberg 43 Shockers 0 2 Nederland 39 Snyder Little Tigers 0 2 Snyder 11 Page 2 of 2 1999 Girl's 10 & Under .Fast .Pitch State Tournament .Tune 18-20,1999 Facts, Figures and Survey results Number of teams participating in tournament 79 Number of games played 159 Number of softball fields used 11 All 3 youth fields were used 8 adult fields were converted by temporary fences Average players per team roster 13 Estimated family/fans per team 10 Total estimated attendance 1800 Economic Impact $762,750.00 Number of hours played 42 Average rooms per team 11.7 Estimated rooms used 900 Number of umpires 11 local, 34 out of town 45 Teams that had been to an ASA tournament in BCS before 45% Satisfaction rating among participating teams 99% Softballs used 288 Coaches ejected 1 Protested ruled on 6 Longest game 9 innings Shortest game 3 innings Most runs scored in a game by a team 25 Rain delay r 1 hour 45 minutes I / Li do solemnly swear (or affirm),that 1 will faithfully execute the ;ties of the office of ?C&7 kc, OWu (r of the State of Texas, and will to the best r-I Elm I kill. of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitutio nd laws 'of the United States and of this State, so help m God. o SWORN TO and Subscribed before me by b I �( J--� (;t An'�L on this 2--> day of ,� l �o� t 11.11IiSTIN M. STARTZMAN i t ";v... Public, state of Texas iv Commission Expires A NOVEMBER 15.1999 19 �l Lo-1-6n V -\, Signature of Person Administering Oath Printed Name Title €61 0 I M }• it I, --�� % , do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of &c- 0 Pik e, 0 «w C . 5 - of the state of Texas, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and laws of the United states and of this state, so help me God. SWORN TO and Subscribed before me by 10hn C (-n�P�Otl on this aJ day of _F l , + 19 �. K"I' IY). �iG+,+)q, (knn J Signature of Person Administering Oath KY "'k �Y)' Printed Name Title '-�- (W- 4-,6&/G )