HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/09/1995 - Regular Agenda - Parks Boardjk d lm VtloW I Illl III bltlui11Y Ili II!"lWu Ill Ill, IIllllIII I Ili IIIhidl ll IIItllllkIllIIMhddd Ill ddYmB Oil Ell 1'ihi111Ill ,iIII A!!III,,dI Ill I'll Ill lLU IIIli iIll IIIli II I luul dluaIll !II. Vimo, e, 1111111 1 'll IIIIillllhlli+WlllomdYV6lIII II
�..
�S -, '� t,
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes
3. Hear Visitors
4. Discussion of Bicycle Routes and Plans
5. Discussion of Proposed Park in Zone 3
6. Discussion of the Board's 1995 Goals
7. Discussion of Neighborhood Park Locations
8. Discussion of 1995 Bond Projects
9. Capital Improvement Program Report
10. Discussion of Future Meeting Dates and Locations
11. Other Business/Board Concerns
12. Adjourn
PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 9,1995 - 7:00 P.M.
CENTRAL PARK CONFERENCE ROOM
1000 KRENEK TAP ROAD
MEMBERS PRESENT: George Dresser, Chair; Carol Reynolds; Greg Taggart; Bob DeOtte;
Barry Harding; Michael Manson; and Nancy Crouch, Council
Liaison
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
Ron Gay, Vice Chair
Steve Beachy, Director; Eric Ploeger, Asst. Director; Ed Hard,
Transportation Planner; and Bridgette George, Staff Assistant
VISITORS: Fain McDougal, McDougal & Company; Ronald Carter, C.S. Little
League; Roland Ruffino; Joe Fazzino; Jim Manhart, 2910 Pueblo
Court; Windwood Subdivision: Kurt Galey, 2601 Brookway Circle;
Misty Gibler, 2605 Brookway; and Dan Bordah, 2609 Brookway
Circle; Government Class: Cortney Loveless, Nicole Speck, Katy
Ganter, Jon Scoggins, Todd Fry, W. Wilton, and John Polansky
1. CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 7:09 p.m.
[I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes were approved as submitted.
111111. HEAR VISITORS:
Ron Carter, College Station Little League, informed the Board, that Little League has been in
operation for 24 years, with 1995 having the largest participation with 1,217 players. In 1994
there were 1,034 players. Normally their is an increase of 8-10% each year. However, in 1995
the league increased by 18%. Currently the league plays 50 games Monday -Friday, and 46
games on Saturday at Southwood. A few games will probably be played on Sunday in order to
get the required number of games played by the season tournament time. In order to
accommodate the additional 19 teams this year, the league moved the t-ball games up two weeks
in March. Mr. Carter was requesting some relief for the 1996 season until the Lincoln Center
fields were opened up. Mr. Carter asked if more fields could be made available for temporary
usage. He identified the soccer fields located at Southwood saying that backstops could be put
up, and also mentioned Sandstone Park. Mr. Carter also informed the Board that the big league
division was going to be opened this year after being dormant for several years. This league
includes 16-18 year Olds. He said that because College Station does not have a facility for these
kids they are going to go to Bryan North to play. Mr. Carter also.mentioned that several College
Station girls play in a little league softball program and they were notified that these girls would
not be allowed to play in the Bryan league after the 1996 season. He also requested the use of
softball fields for these girls. Mr. Carter would also like to see a board of youth athletics,
consisting of members from various youth organizations, organized that would help the Parks
Board keep up to date with the youth league growing pains.
Steve referred back to the fact that Bryan is not allowing residents from College Station to play in
their leagues and asked if Little League was initiating that same type of action for non College
Station residents. Mr. Carter stated that Iola has teams that play, but stated that they have to have
Parks & Recreation Board
Regular Meeting
May 9, 199S
Page (2)
a sponsor. Steve also asked if the girls softball program was slow pitch or fast pitch. Mr. Carter
stated that he believes 9-10 are slow, and 11-12 are fast. Steve mentioned that College Station
already offers a girls softball program that is run through the Amateur Softball Association.
Kurt Galey is a new resident in the Windwood . subdivision and has been asked by several
residents to .represent them at the meeting. Mr. Galey stated that Windwood Park has no lights
located on the premises and that there has been some activities going on at night that worry some
of the residents. The Police Department has been called out several times but they have stated
that they can not do surveillance on the park because it is too dark. Ms. Gibler stated that there
are a lot of trees, shrubs, and yaupon in the park and does not want to see them thinned out
because they provide a lot of shade. Mr. Bordah stated that he would like to see the light put in
as soon as possible in order to discourage the unwanted nightly activities.
George mentioned that there was an item in the bond issue requesting funds for 'neighborhood
park lighting, but it did not pass. He informed the residents that the Board would look into
providing light for that park.
IV. DISCUSSION OF BICYCLE ROUTES AND PLAN:.
Ed 'Hard;, Transportation Planner, informed the Board that in October 1993, the City Council
adopted the Bikeway Master Plan. Just after that, the State authorized funds for projects such as
the. Bikeway Master Plan through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA).
The city submitted an application for those funds and out of 252 applications, the City of College
Station was ranked 5th, and was awarded one million dollars`. The Council then approved the
local match at $275,000 to be used on the project. Ed showed a map of the proposed bikeway
plan and explained some of the routes. He mentioned that a consultant will have to be hired to
develop the actual construction plans. The State will then be, responsible for bidding out the
project and overseeing the construction. Ed said that it will probably take about 2-3 years to
finish the project once it is started.
Mike asked if the bikeway plan included a bike route to Lick Creek Park. Ed stated .that it has not
been included in the bike loop but was identified on the map. He stated that no funds have been
earmarked for a route to Lick Creek. Mike stated that he would like to discuss the possibility of
putting mountain bike trails at Lick Creek Park.
George asked Steve to get Veronica Morgan to attend future meetings to discuss, the, bike, trails,
and' sidewalks portion of the' bond issue, so that she could keep the Board updated on the
progress.
V. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED PARK INZONE 3:
Steve showed a map depicting the proposed parkland dedication. The land is located between .
Texas Avenue and the bypass near the Crystal.. Plaza. Mr. McDougal explained that the, owners
want to know if the Board is interested in accepting this land for a park. He stated that it is 13.9
acres and he does not envision, many improvements; but rather left in its natura.I state, much like
gg g` leaving the large trees. This
the arboretum. He suggested clearing out some of the underbrush
land is flood prone during heavy rains and could not be develop as.anything else. Currently there ;.
is a trailer park adjacent to the land. Mr. McDougal stated that they are in the process of platting
the ' -,land and need to know if the Board ,is interested in it: This_request exceeds the ;required.
dedication amount. Steve stated that there 'is. currently. no park, in that area to .serve those
residents; so accepting the land fora park would be; a positive issue. However, he stated that
both visibility and accessibility would be a primary concern. He also stated that the. Engineering
Department would have to look closely at the drainage issue before a decision could be made.
Steve told Mr. McDougal that he would need to address some of the previous concerns discussed
prior to the Board making a decision on accepting the land. Mr. McDougal stated that quite a bit
of the land" is not in 'the flood plain. The Board ,agreed, that this issue was. worth investigating
further and would like to get more information regarding the previous concerns mentioned.
t\`
Parks & Recreation Board
Regular Meeting
May 9, 1995
Page (3)
VI. DISCUSSION OF BOARD'S 1995 GOALS:
This topic was postponed until another meeting.
VI1. DISCUSSION OF NEIGHBORHOOD PARK LOCATIONS:
Steve displayed a map showing the two locations being offered as park land in the Shenandoah
subdivision. One area is owned by the Home Owner's Association (HOA) and is located next to
their private pool complex and tennis courts. The members of that association would have to
approve of the donation of the land to the city. The second area's dedication requirement is for
the next phase of construction and is less than five acres. The Board could inform the Planning
and Zoning Commission that they would prefer cash in lieu of land, if that's what they decided to
do. Steve stated that he would not want to accept both parcels of land. The HOA's land is more
readily available and accessible. Also, there are no funds available in that zone to proceed with
park development on the other land, if accepted. Greg stated that the HOA property needs to be
regraded, the detention pond cleaned up and resodded, but is a better choice because it could be
used immediately. George asked staff to follow up with the HOA and see if the members would
approve the donation. He would also like for the Engineering Department to take a look at the
detention pond and see what it would take to stabilize it and make it safe.
Steve stated that the negotiations to purchase the additional land in Zone 7 were not successful.
The 4.3 acre parkland was then put on the last city election authorizing the City Council to sell
that land, if they chose to do so. Steve pointed out another section of land just northeast of the
site, and stated that the owner might be interested in swapping some of that land. The city could
then purchase additional land adjacent to it, making a 7-8 acre park. George mentioned that
there is a major study going on, currently funded by the Department of Transportation, to look at
�r alternatives for the Wellborn Road Corridor. Public Hearings will be held within the next couple
ofweeksto get a consensus plan for the corridor by the end of this year. George stated that
without knowing what the specific proposals are for Wellborn Road he would be leery about.
making decisions about that parcel of land right now. The Board agreed to hold off making a
decision about the land at this time.
VIII. DISCUSSION OF 1995 BOND PROTECTS:
Ric passed a list of the bond issues and the approved timelines for the utilization of those funds.
He stated that the athletic park acquisition was moved up to FY97-98. The. funds will be
available in $500,000 increments for three consecutive years. Ric also mentioned that the.
$200,000 that was approved for ballfield improvements, will be used at Central to improve the
ballfields, as well as erecting new fences and a new shade structure at the Bee Creek softball
complex. Some of the funds may be used to clean out the arboretum. George encouraged the
members to keep aware of any land that could be used as an athletic park, stating that funds
could be attained if Council approved borrowing funds from the Utility Fund.
IX. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT:
Ric stated that the Thomas and Oaks improvements have been completed.
The Wolf Pen Creek rest room building is going well. This project should be finished by the end
of this month. The facility is usable, it's just lacking a roof. The contractor is waiting on the
wood for the roof which must be fire retardant.
The Southwood Pool renovation project is still in negotiations with the second company. The first
company refused to sign the contract due mainly to the indemnity clause.
The Sandstone Park design is ready to go. Staff is just waiting for a parking lot design from the
Engineering Department. It will then go out to bid.
Parks & Recreation BoA
Regular Meeting
May 9, 1995 .
Page (4)
`L The Wolf Pen Creek concrete additions have worked out very well. Willie Nelson parked two of
his tour busses on the new addition on the driveway. Also, near the parking lotentrance a
concrete pad will be established with a dedicated electrical service to be utilized by vendors;
such as Taco Bell. Carol stated that she would like to see more trash cans located at the
amphitheater. Ric stated that there have been some problems with people rolling the trash cans
down the hill, so staff has had to bolt the trash cans down.
The Brother's Pond area light will be installed this month to help curb some of the vandalism
going on at the playground.
Ric also mentioned that the dredging should begin at Wolf Pen Creek beginning in June.
X. DISCUSSION OF FUTURE MEETING DATES AND LOCATIONS:
George asked when the new board members would be appointed. Steve stated that Council
normally appoints them in May.
X1. OTHER BUSINESS/BOARD CONCERNS:
Mike would like to talk about the bicycle issue at Lick Creek Park at a future meeting.
Steve mentioned that included in the packets was the latest HOK report. No new park items were
identified.. He also informed the board. that HOK would be holding their first public hearing on
May 23, at 6:30 p.m. at. the Conference, Center. They will be showing '.what they have
accomplished thus far and will be asking for ideas and questions from the citizens.
George 'stated that he talked with council candidate Mr. Maloney andexplained to him about
Wolf Pen Creek:' Mr. Maloney admitted that lie -did not know, much about Wolf Pen Creek and
that George was probably right, but he had already Out his campaign together and wasn't
interested in changing it. Barry stated that he feels the Board should, still pursue educating the
public about the issue.
Greg received a complaint from David Alexander, who was complaining on behalf of the
Camellia Court residents, about the Willie Nelson concert. He stated that the ;citizens could hear
the concert with their doors and windows shut, as well as the air conditioner running. Mr.
Alexander, called the. Police who stated that they had received several calls` regarding the concert.
George was at the concert and stated ,that he sat down on the cement right in`front of Willie and
could comfortably talk with the person seated next to him:. He stated that the music was not very
loud and was surprised about the complaints. Steve stated` that. decibel checks are done `at several
locations around Wolf Pen Cree_k,,and if the level exceeds the approved level the music is turned
down. Greg stated that he would give the man's address to Bridgette so that Steve could respond
to the complaint.
George asked who did the advertising for the events, he felt like some events were not promoted
enough. Steve stated that promoter's advertise for their own events, whereas the .City will
advertise for any city -sponsored events.
XI1. ADIOURN:
The Board adjourned at 9:44 p.m.
NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE
PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD
of the City of College Station
Notice is hereby given that a (Regular)(Special)( REGULAR
PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD
) meeting of the
of the City of College Station, State of Texas will be held on the 9th day of
MAY 1, 1995, at 7 : 00 (AR)(P.M.), at 1101 SOUTH TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842
The following subjects will be discussed, to -wit:
SEE AGENDA
DATED THIS THE 5th DAY OF MAY
, 1995.
j CITY COLLEGE STATION, ERAS
e
BY
CONNIE HOOKS, CITY SECRETARY
I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the
reqular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Board
of the City of College Station, Texas is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and
correct copy of said Notice on the bulletin board, in the City Hall of said City of College Station, Texas, a
place convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times, and said Notice was posted on
MAY 5 , 1995, at 5 : 00 o'clock (A) (P.M.)
DATED THIS THE DAY OF �CLU/-
1995.
SUSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS CONNIE HOOKS, CITY SECRETARY
THE DAY OF�M _ 1995.
NOTAR PUBLIC - BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
My commission expires: ~ 5 ` �✓
05/05/95 12:06 %Y409 764 3737 CS PARKS & REC 0 002
1. Coll. to Order
Z. Approval of Minutes
3. near Visitors
4. Discussion of Bicycle Routes and Plans
5. Discussion of Proposed Parr in Zone 3
6. Discussion of the Board's 1995 Goals
7. Discussion of Neighborhood Parr Locations
8. Discussion of 1995 Bond Projects
9. Capital Improvement Program Report
10. Discussion of Future Meeting Gates and Locations
11. Other Business/Board Concerns
12. Adjourn
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
MAY 1995
OAKS AND THOMAS PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Project Number: PK9203 and PK0033
Budget: Oaks - $92,000 and Thomas - $29,000
Contract Amount: $118,000
Project Manager: Peter Vanecek
Design: In-house
Comments/Status: Oaks improvements to include improved lighting, bridge
replacement, handicap accessible playground, sand
volleyball court, and walkway improvements. Thomas
improvements to include a swing set replacement and
jogging trail/walkway improvements. Funding is 91
Bond. The low bid from Marek Brothers Construction
was approved by City Council on October 13, 1994.
This project is now complete
Task: Project Design: June -July 1994
Advertise & Award: September -October 1994
Complete: April1995
2. WOLF PEN CREEK AMPHITHEATER REST ROOM BUILDING
Project Number:
PK9404
Budget:
$185,000
Contract Amount:
Design Fee $14,500, JHW $172,260
Project Manager:
Eric Ploeger
Design:
Patterson Architects
Comments/Status:
Council approved Patterson Architects for the project
design February 24. The project was be bid on October
10, 1994, and bids opened on October 28, 1994. The
low bid by JHW Contractors was accepted by Council on
November 10, 1994. Additional site lighting and
concrete walks approved in the FY94-95 budget were
included in the JHW contract. This project is
approximately 85% complete. Yet to finish is the roofing
installation, lighting, and site clean-up.
Task:
Project Design: April -August 1994
Advertise & Award: November 1994
Complete: April1995
C. I. P. Report
May 3, 1995
Page (2)
3. SOUTHWOOD POOL RENOVATION
Project Number:
PK9502
Budget:
$219,000
Contract Amount:
N/A
Project Manager:
Eric Ploeger
Design:
Contracted engineering firm
Comments/Status:
The renovation efforts will be designed by an outside
engineering firm. An RFQ was issued and six responses
were received. The firms were ranked by a staff
committee and the highest ranked firm was
recommended and approved by Council on January 12,
1995. The firm selected was Jose Gill Engineers of
Austin, Texas. Unfortunately negotiations with Gil
Engineering have broken down due to disagreemnts
concerning contract language. The second ranked firm
of HSI has been contacted and negotiations are now
underway.
Task:
Project Design: February - June 1995
Advertise & Award: July - September 1995
Complete: January 1996
4. SANDSTONE PARK DEVELOPMENT
Project Number:
PK N/A
Budget:
$250,000
Contract Amount:
N/A
Project Manager:
Eric Ploeger
Design:
In-house
Comments/Status: The preliminary design for the park was approved by
Council January 25, 1995. Construction plans are being
prepared by the Parks Planning Staff. Staff anticipates
placing project up for bid in mid July.
Task: Project Design: February - March 1995
Advertise & Award: March May 1995
Complete: November 1995
C.I. P. Report
May 3, 1995
Page (3)
5. WOLF PEN CREEK AMPHITHEATER CONCRETE ADDITIONS
Project Number: PK9502
Budget: $33,000
Contract Amount: $11,089.12
Project Manager: Peter Vanecek
Project Design: In-house
Comments/Status: This project includes widening the amphitheater
driveway, additional walkways and spotlight pads. This
contract was awarded to R.M. Dudley, Inc. Another
portion of this project is to screen the dumpsters at the
site. This will be done through the Public Services
Department as they have an existing program that pays a
portion of the cost of these screenings. This project is
complete.
Task: Project Design:
Advertisement & Award:
Complete:
6. BROTHERS POND AREA LIGHT
Project Number: PK N/A
Budget: $4,500 - Park Zone 5
Contract Amount: $4,460
Project Manager: Peter Vanecek
Project Design: In-house
January - February 1995
March 1995
April 1995
Dedication Funds
Comments/Status: This is the installation of an area light at the playground
in response to staff and neighborhood concerns over
vandalism.
Task: Project Design: March 1995
Advertisement & Award: April 1995
Complete: May 1995
? .'_
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
Architecture, Engineering, Planning, Interiors,
Graphics, Facilities Consulting
Weekly Project Progress Report
to: Acne x gblleltionj
Donal Simpson, AICP (HOK)
Tim Terry (HOK)
Gary Jost, PE (B-A)
Mike McKay, PE (CDM)
Project File (94-317-122)
from: Joseph A. Pobiner, AICP
6688 North Central Expressway, Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75206-3912
Telephone: 214 739 6688 Fax: 214 373 9523
date: 5 May-1995
period: 1-5 May 1995
project. • College Station Comprehensive Plan
HOK Project #94-317-122
., .:.. ...,� .
1) Project Activity:
Phase 1 - Ongoing
Phase 2 - JP spoke with Jane Kee regarding the housing condition survey/count. Jane
indicate the tracts/block groups were there were some concerns. Also indicated the city
limit needs to include the Fol subdivision. JP will re -look at the speck block groups.
Opportunities/constraints analyses complete.
Phase 3 -
• Water - CDM is entering processing land use and service area data to assign flows
to nodes in the system. Evaluations have been added to the system nodes. Water
use summary for the past 3 years has been ,.entered : to determine breakdowns
between residential and commercial demand:
• Wastewater - CDM is continuing with manhole entry and service area development.
Phase 4 - (no activity yet)
Additional Services:
• Space Utilization Analysis - Presented draft report to City Council last week. Fnal. .
report to be submitted after City comments received and addressed.
2) Project Meetings:
None during this week.
3) Areas of Concern:
Offices ill
None at this time.
.... - .. _..:: - ,,.,u-. - . %-G-1— rac . K.-- Cii, . San 1'ruu.i>r11 . Un :\nkclon - Tnkvn - Norm Korn; - Berlin - London
Weeldy Project Progress Report
College Station Comprehensive Plan
4) Upcoming Project Requirements:
The following tasks are expected to be completed over the next few weeks:
Phase 2 - Community Workshop #1 scheduled for Tuesday, 23 May 1995.
Phase 3 - Continue modelling of existing infrastructure systems.
5) Project Progress:
Task /o,Com *q
Task 1 Project Management 410% '
PHASE 1 TOTAL
Task 2
Public Participation
75'!o`'
Task 3
Base Map
1 Q0%°
Task 4
Review Existing/Previous Studies
100%
Task 5
Opportunities & Constraints Analysis
100°%
Task 6
Alternate Growth & Development Scenarios
9'/°
PHASE 2 TOTAL : : ,
92%
Task 7
Land Use Plan
Task 8
Parks & Open Space Plan
Task 9
Urban Design Plan
Task 10
Thoroughfare Plan
Task 11,
Water, Model
Task 12
Wastewater Model
Task 13
Regulatory Analysis
Task 14
Capital Improvements Program
PHASE 3 TOTAL
Task 15 .
-Colriprehensive t Plan Adoption
Task 16
Comprehensive' Plan Reports & Drawings
Task 17
GIS Implementation
Task 18
Space Utilization Study
PHASE 4 TOTAL
TOTAL PROJECT
Sutmitied by; `
s h . Pobiner, AICP
Director of Community Planning
The HOK Planning Group
/rm
30%
20%
20%
18%
18%
18%
8%
2%
23%
0%
0%
0%
90%
25%
5 may 1995
Page 2
Inter®ffice Memo
To: All Managers involv in t e Capital Improvements Program
From: Kent Laza
Date: May 3, 1995
.:_Subject: Capital Improvements Budget _
Attached is a copy of the Capital Improvements Program budget for the next five years.
This budget is intended to serve as a guideline for the sale of G.O.- and Revenue Bonds as
well as the scheduling of projects. My intention is to update the budget each year to
reflect the changing needs of the city. If you have changes or corrections to the
document, please forward those to my office so they can be included in the master copy.
Thank you.
Capital Improvement Projects
Proposed Capital Improvement Budget
Last Revision - May 1, 1995
1, General Obligation Bonds -
1995 Authorization
A. Street Projects
IFY 1984-95
FY 1995-96
FY 1996-97
FY 1997-98
FY 1998-99
FY 1999-00
Total Project
Oversize Participation
150,000€
145,000
155,000
149,000
599,000€
N/S Corridor
125,000
1,128,000
1,253,000
Major Thoroughfare Rehab
312,0001
200,0001
512,0001
N. Forrest Pkwy
933,000:
933,000:
SW Parkway Rehab
92,0001
900,000
992,000
Tarrow St. South
309,000
309,000
Rock Prairie West
495,000'
495,0001
Anderson St. Rehab
130,000€
1,148,000�
1,278,000:
Kyle St. ROW
550,000::
550,000!
University Oaks Rehab
736,000
736,000€
Graham Rd. Upgrade
110,000
1,532,0001
766,0001
2,408,0001
A. Subtotal
11,140,0001
1,930,000
1,403,0001
2,307,000
3,285,000 1:
10,065,000:
1
B. Sidewalks, Bi4trails, and Northgate'Irrmprovements
€
Misc. Sidewalk &Trails
:
!
i
_ 1001000
170,000 �
320,0001
220,000
29.0,0001
1,100,000
Northgate Improvements
300,0001
200,000
500,000
B. Subtotal
400,000
370,000:
320,000
220,000
290,000:
1,600,000
C. Traffic Projects
Traffic Signal Enhance. Projects
420,000
280,0001
380,000€
440,0001
380,000�
1,900,000'
D. Drainage Projects
Misc. Drainage
395,0003
370,000'
462,000�
733,000
725,000€
2,685,000`
E. Library Services
Library
700,000
1,200,000
735,000=
2,635,000
F. Fire Station Reloc.
Reloc./Const. Fire Station #1
935,000€
935,0001
I
Capital Improvement Projects
I
G. Parks and Recreation
FY 1994-95 IFY 1995-96 IFY 1996-97 =FY 1997-98 ;:FY 1998-99'.FY
1999-00 Total Project 1
Pebble Creek Park Development
200,0001
200,000
Bee Creek/Central Upgrade
200,000'
200,000
Athletic Park Acquisition
500,0001 500,0001
500,0001 1,500,000;
Lincoln/Wayne Smith Imp.
80,000 1,150,000
1,230,000
Park Imp. and Dev.
Linclon Center Maintenance Shop
G. Subtotal
280,000€ 1,150,000! 700,0001 500,0001
500,000€ 3,130,000€
• i i
i
H. Land Purchase for Public. Facilities
Public Land, Purchase
430,000
430,000€
y' .,�22 �• '/J•�� �•:.{+i�h/ j �\\"�� F��y{/,', •.,•..22 /Fy'{��y ,Cy, • 2�.\ /h'��}'{ i?\\:2 ,}µ��}{�. .L}' \\22� r, /�}1i 2``Z} r yy�(�.
2��t'll�l,}`�•'� ��`I•'�T�•�••' �/ \� } .......... ..... �}�TY�T�,�•'�Y T���� ��'1r Y•n��Y f-FR.�W\M�LVM������� ':�i�:
<a':.,. .x.:� aQ22i��:.x,x,ux:t:,<£.<aaa\:�:;::'.:.:uhek��e��i��J�i�2be�SoLJni•}�fewQci,a 2wh<kiCh\�.�• aa2.c: i,: 2Jwa•2wae: \' .A<.Y22222aw\vahif\tk `;...•+\\\\�i�\
Includes $880,000 of Drainage Funds from 1984 Authorization
ll. General Obligation Bonds - 1991 Authorization
A. Parks and Recreation
IFY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY
1999-00 Total Project
Eastgate PaW Improvements
i 60,000:
60,000
Oaks Park Improvements
69,000 44,000€
113,000'
Central Park Improvements
1161000 1 4,000
120,000
Sandstone Park Development
250,000
250,000
Thomas Park Improvements
66,000 22,0001
88,000€
A. Subtotal
251,000 ` 380,000 0 0 0
a
0 631,000 i
B. Street Projects
College Main Rehab '
800,0001
800,000
Arnold Road
400,000
400,000
B. Subtotal
0 1,200,000':. 0:• 0€ 0
0 1 1,200,0001
^:>i2` 22222sk>2 `:acr �2x}2 •c:,22 i�
}�yia��1''2. �� ?'•
�Tbc:ffi'M!„ ?Y. •.�
rwrrhxtwrrM•xrnxou:,uiu».r„wr,w #,`}}`���sUa\3a\ui�+?iwr}}'s'uu},z,'}y,;;,i,;.»:�Jn\�»}.},o��„wiaSi.�,>'.\�'::'
` Includes funds from 1994 and 1995 CDBG
Capital Improvement Projects
///. Genera/ Obligation Bonds - 1989 Authorization
A. Street Projects IFY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 Total Project I
East Rock Prairie Rd. Rehab 200,000 200,000
IV, General Obligation Bonds - 1984 Authorization,
A. Drainage Projects
IFY 1994-95
FY 1995-96
FY 1996-97
FY 1997-98
FY 1998-99
FY 1999-00
Total Project
Bee Crk. Sewer/Drainage Rehab
142,000
142,000
V. Utility Revenue Bonds_
A. Electrical Distribution
IFY 1994-95
FY 1995-96
FY 1996-97
FY 1997-98
FY 1998-99
FY 1999-00
Total Project
Distribution System Addition
950,000i
925,000!
1,175,000'S1,260,00
1,305,000€
4,355,000'
'I Industrial Park Electric Svc.
!
10,000
600,000'
750,000'
1,360,000'
Residential Street lighting
120,000:
130,0001
140,000'
150,000'
160,000'
700,000'
Thoroughfare Street Lighting
360,000:
450,000:
260,000'
285,000'
295,000'
1,650,000'
University Dr. Undrgrnd. Conv.
2,450,000
200,000'
2,650,000
Thouroughfare Und. Dist. Conv.
200,000'
1,387,000
1,278,0001
2,312,000
1,800,000
6,977,000
Utility Svc. Center Improvements
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,0001
20,0001
100,000
SCADA Enhancements
25,000•
50,000:
25,000
25,000'
25,000'
150,000:
Substation Add. & Mod.
350,000'
75,000'
75,000:
175,000:
75,000'
750,000:
Substation Addition (Finfeather)
1,000,000'•.
1,000,000
Third Transmission Line
900,000'
900,000€
1,800,000;
Underground Dist. Capacity
650,000'
876,000'
500,000:
2,026,000"
Utility Cust. Inf. System
135,000'
410,000'
75,000
620,000
Utility Customer Service Center
1,500,000
500,0001
2,000,000
A. Subtotal' 1,635,000 5,395,000 4,562,000 4,849,000 4,617,000 5,080,000 26,138,000
Capital Improvement Projects
B. Water Service,
IFY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97
FY 1997-98
FY 1998-99
FY 1999-00 Total Project
Oversized Lines
50,000
50,0001
50,0.00
50,000
50,000
50,0001 300,000
Sebesta Rd. w/ Frontage Line
355,350;
355,350=
Water Well #5 and Line
125,000'
1,250,000€
1,375,0001
#1 High Service Pump
100,000:
315,000
415,000€
Cooling Tower #3 and Pump
145,0001
955,0001
1,100,000
SCADA
25,0001
25,0001
25,000€
75,000€
Distribution System
250,000'
500,0001
250,000"
250,0001
250,000
250,0001 1,750,000
Utility Infrastructure Master Plan
40,000=
40,000:
B. Subtotal )
845,3501
1,825,000,
570,000
1,570,000
300,000
300,000 5,410,350
C. Wastewater Service
Oversized Lines
30,000
30,0001
30,0001
30,0001
30,000
30,0001 180,0001
Graham Road Extension
243,000
243,000
Greens Prairie Interceptor
250,000•'.
750,000
1,000,000
Texas Ave. Widening
225,000'
125,000:
i
350,000
Collection Rehab
275,000`
500,0001
500,000
500,000
500,000 2,275,000
Eastgate
500,000 =
500,0001
Bee Creek Rehab II
375,000:
'
375,000:
Carter's Creek WWTP Improvements
1
7,231,5001
1,586,300
8,817,800:
Lick Creek WWTP Improvements
:
750,000
2,500,0001
3,250,000:
SCADA
100,000
50,000=
50,0001
200,000
Utility Infrastructure Master Plan
40,000 1
40,000
C. Subtotal
8,144,500€
2,666,3001
830,0001
2,030,000
3,030,000€
530,000: 17,230,800
�'�.%.��.:'��,;%�:$fiefa�*..>•..•::.:,•.;,.:.::.:•.�:>;::.;,•.;,•.>•.,.i.1...• .(:.#� :;. .:..• •'� i� t��,`c f�. �,�z�%+��j] �...�` dc:.: ��'1� �L f��•�••>•='`�c� �i.�! �«.!�
..•...:..:..:..,......»..•s.:H:.,....,.w.v}..ta.,«:,.,.•rw:.::>::»:::rs::.at::>..•.as�'rd��CiA`W��w��.3��3v!�a:!:::.,•:tY A•��s`fa�a,.v,�.�t'dsw.�3aT..a::n+�•.f�+.ti.�$`�ICiC>7.•�v��`G+Y,a�.�������`�va..i'..•a�dtfdi�'wt'wt'i� .. .. ..........
i
Capital Improvement Projects
Vl, Certificates of Obligation
A. Electrical Distribution
IFY 1994-95
FY 1995-96
FY 1996-97 .
FY 1997-98
FY 1998-99
FY 1999-00 Total Project
800 MHZ Radio System
1,732,0001
796,0001
2,528,000
s
B. Business Park
Phase 1
1,000,000::
1,000,000
C. Public Buildings
Renovate City Hall
75,00M
525,0001
600,000
D. Management Services
Public Safety System Enhanc.
95,000
648,000:
743,000
Work Order System
10,000:
100,000:
110,000
AS/400 Replacement
575,000€
575,000
GIS System Enhancement
30,000€
20,000=
50,000
Imaging
7,000
200,0001
200,0001
407,000
D. Subtotal
0,
717,000
948,000:
220,000
0
0: 1,885,000
I
V//. General Fund
A. Parks and Recreation
IFY 1994-95
FY 1995-96
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98
FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 Total Project
Brothers Park Exercise Equipment
7,000
i
7,000;
Southwood Pool Renovation
135,000€
74,000'
i 209,000
A. Subtotal
0
142,000 €
74,0001 0
01 0 216,000'
B. Public Buildings
Facility Maintenance Building
205,000:`
205,000•`
C. Management Services
Computer Networking
181,0001
125,0001 161,000
35,000€ 70,000 572,0001
. ;:.....,,:::::.::.:.:.::,::::.....:�:22't`.Y�'"'+:i:'t22•`.2..,,,.:: ...: :22'+.2`.2225 .,� ...
%�::r��:t{�LIYLl�1%l� � J �Y�'.�'#�`.;:'j;::%i:�h��V'.. y: ;.v. �:�:1aG�i�� +� �j � •• t
"•,t,+:. ���a����..�\ •.`.�,..�.�..�oa CL��CcCO.��a���a����
..��.Y
.::�•::•:::::.:!'• •:. ... - ��~ : ' ,. >,tL,, •;t •:,•:�.:f":a::aa+x va�.,.,...,�.a��.��C;•.•'.:u.wtGi,aa.a�.,�a�a�Zt
�..`�.��a�aaa�av�Lvaia<ik
�CC��'C!�� � �C���\
Vlll. Hotel/Motel Fund
A. Parks and Recreation
Wolf Pen Creek Concrete Additions
Wolf Pen Creek Lighting Additions
Wolf Pen Creek Loading Project
Wolf Pen Creek Restrooms
Capital Improvement Projects
1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1996=97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 Total Project
33,000 33,000
16,000' 16,000
3,000 3,000
14,0001 171,000 € 185,000
IX. Parkland Dedication Fund
A. Parks and Recreation
IFY 1994-95
FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99
FY 1999-00 Total Project
Anderson/Gabbard SBA Tree Grant
13,0001
3,0001 3,000' 2,000
21,000
Brothers Area Light
5,000= '
5,000
Zone 7 Project
288,000
288,000
Lincoln/Wayne Smith Acquisition
'•
80,000`
80,000
Capital Improvement Projects
X/. Unfunded Projects
A. Business Park (FY 1994-95
FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99
FY 1999-00
Total Project
Phase II
1 3,000,000€
3,000,000€
B. Parks and Recreation
Lincoln/Wayne Smith Improvements 1
60,000::.
E
60,000
Lincoln Center Maintenance Shop =
: = 25,0001
425,000
450,000
Park Improvements and Development
?
1,000,0001
1,000,0001
B. Subtotal 0
'
0 0. 60,000 25,000
E
1,425,000:`
1,510,000
C. Northgate Improvements
Misc. Land Acquisition
400,0001 500,000;
900,000,
:
D. Fire Station Relocation
Relocate Fire Station No. 2
935,000
935,000
. .
It
-n
a
MWW
1 22
R7
SUMMARY,
..lElAS 32.96 AC.
".E ftc
i—o
0
%
It
io-
51, ...
P-A iislEH 12-92 AC.
rloo
to C
g
PRELIMINARY `,-"B" --DEVELOPMENT STUDY
PATIO / GARDEN HOMES
TEXAS AVENUE 101 LOTS -_50'X105 TYPICAL
-1\1013THRUP-�s OCIATES, INC.
MENTAL REAL E�STAT
ING - ENVIRONMENTAL
- - - - - - - - - - -- - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 777'� - - - - - - - - -
7-77—�
NOT TO SCALE
a
Total number registered: 1,151
Total registered by mail: 583
Total registered by walk-in: 528
Total registered late: 40
Registered by
46%
Player counts by division
300_ 249 268
243
250 AM -2a
200 _ 152
138 138
150- 111 116 105 113
100 _ 58 55
50 _
0
Tball Jrmin LP Mnor
®Total ®National D American
Registration types
Registered late
3%
alk-in
registration
51%
t0 O N W A
U1
j
A's
Ns
N
_
•
Astros
,p
Astros
cn
�
-
-
Blue Jays
4,
Braves
Braves ., .
Brewers
Cardinals
�,
f
Cubs
Cubs
rn
-
Dodgers
D odgers
Giants A
Giants
Indians r
-•
m
-
_
n
Mariners
Marlins
a
-
�.
Marlins „
Mets
,�,
�
Q
-
_
Orioles
w
Mets
w
_
Pirates
Orioles
Rangers
N
-
Pirates''
Red Sox,.
N
-
Rockies
s
Rangers
Twins , w
Red Sox Y
White Sox � .., ,,.._ .�. � �, .:..:, �:, ...
N
Reds
cn
Yankees � � ,,� �
u ,�
Rockies
White
Sox
A
Yankees,, y�
a
WWI
r
r-
O N A O aD O N A O)
A's
A
Astros
w
Indians ,w
o
—
W
K
Marlins
n
O
c
—
O
.,
Orioles
4 '" 4 v,
m
_
O
Rangers
Reds
„,, w
venom
Rockies
room
O N
A� 00 O N A O W
Blue Jays
Braves
N
Cubs
N
Dodgers
�, N
Giants
N
Indians
w
Iola
Marlins
w
Met$
�.� . ,4 �,;zi
Orioles
Phiilies
N
Pirates
i ry
Rangers
„f `
w
Reds
Rockies OMB w
Twins
x, t � � N
White Sox�+�!
Yankees
MEMO N
3
TO: RON CARTER (COLLEGE STATION LITTLE LEAGUE)
JUNIOR LEAGUE (13 YRS.)
f1i)Z�'i'iCai1:
1. A's -
13
2. Orioles -
13
3. Rangers -
13 TOTAL PLAYERS = 95
National:
4. Marlins -
14
5. Dodgers-
14
6. Rockies -
14
7. Astros -
14
SENIOR LEAGUE (14 & 15 YRS.)
<4merican:
1. Wiite Sox -
14
2. Indians -
14
3. Royals -
14
4. Twins -
14 TOTAL PLAYERS: 95,
National:
5. Pirates -
13
6. Astros -
13
7. Reds -
13
BIG LEAGUE (16.17. 18 YRS.)
American:
1. College Station American - 13
Al ational: TOTAL PLAYERS: 26
2. College Station National - 13
COMBINED TOTAL PLAYERS JR., SR., AND BIG: 214
Printed by Bridgette George 5/08/95 8:16am
From: Jane Kee
To: Bridgette George
Subject: Parks Board
-----------------------------------
-NOTE=====-----=====5/05/95=10:47am==
Fain MacDougal.will be at Tues. mtg. to
discuss the property on Texas north of
Mile Dr. Ed will be there for bike
stuff. Ya'll have fun. I'll be home
yelling at my kids. We still gotta get
those t-shirts that have "I yell
because I care".
D="=,! 1
* Oversee design process and implement construction for
Sandstone Park.
* Conduct Public hearings and oversee design process for
Woodway Park.
* Promote success of Bond program.
* Follow through on Master Plan process.
* Investigate neighborhood park for Foxfire.
Im* Develop concept plan for large athletic park (pre -bond
election) . Identify potential sites.
* Design small park that serves Spring Loop residents.
* Investigate opportunities for additional park land.
* Examine the impact of annexation on park needs.
* Develop concept for Lick Creek Park.
* Significantly increase the use of Wolf Pen Creek Amphitheater
(Double?).
* Revisit the Parkland Dedication Ordinance.
* Move forward with the Lincoln Center/Wayne Smith Park
Masterplan (as much as possible).
WK
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, hic. 6688 North Central Expressway, Suite 700
Architecture, Engineering, Planning, Interiors, Dallas, Texas 75206-3912
Graphics, Facilities Consulting Telephoner 214 739 6688 - Fax: 214 373 9523
Weekly Project Progress Report
to: Jane" Kee;. AICP (City of -College .Station)
Donal Simpson, AICP (HOK)
Tim Terry (HOK)
Gary.Jost, PE (B-A)
Mike McKay, PE (CDM)
Project File (94-317-122) - -
from: Joseph A. Pobiner, AICP
date: 7 April 1995
period: 3-7 April,1995
project: College Station Comprehensive Plan
HOK Project #94-317-122
1) Project Activity:
Phase 1 - Ongoing
Phase 2- Housing count/condition survey 75% complete - HOK staff to be in College
Station week of 10 April to complete survey. All opportunities and constraints digitized with
the exception of topography. HOK working with, City staff to receive digital topographic
data files for incorporation.
Phase 3 -
Water - CDM is entering pipe and system data into model and has developed an
outline for the water section of the final report and a draft introduction.
Wastewater - CDM is identifying service area connections for entryinto the model,
continuing to enter pip data as it is received from the City (currently about 750 pipes),
and is about 80% complete with digitizing the existing land use data.
Phase 4 - (no activity yet)
Additional Services:
• Space Utilization Analysis - Ongoing.
• Drainage Utility Master Plan - To be done under separate contract directly with CDM.
2) Project Meetings:
None during this week.
3) Areas of Concern:
None at this time.
Offices in:
New York - Washinglon. D.C. - Creenville.SC - Atlanta - Tampa/Orlando . St. Louis - Dallas • Houston - Mexico City - Kansas City - San Francisco - Los Angeles - Tokyo - Hong Kong - Berlin - London
Weekly Project Progress Report
College Station Comprehensive Plan
4) Upcoming Project Requirements:
The following tasks are expected to be completed over the next few weeks:
Phase 2 - Complete topographic analysis and housing count/condition survey.
Phase 3 - Continue modelling of existing infrastructure systems.
5) Project Progress:
Task
%Complete
., 5q-
Task 1
Project Management
PHASE 1
TOTAL
360/0 .
Task 2
Public Participation
75%
Task 3
Base Map
100%
Task 4
Review Existing/Previous;Studies
87%a
Task 5
Opportunities & Constraints Analysis
75%:,:
Task 6
Alternate Growth:& Development Scenarios
9%
PHASE 2 TOTAL
87%
Task 7
Land Use Plan
30% 5
Task 8
Parks & Open Space Plan
Task 9
Urban Desi9 n:Plan
20%
Task .10
Thoroughfare: Pian,
1.8%° :.
Task 11
Water Model.,.;
18%., .
Task` 12
W`A' stewatec Model
18%
Task 13
Regulatory Analysis
8%
Task 14
Capital Improvements Program
2%
PHASE 3 TOTAL
23%
Task 15
Comprehensive Plan Adoption.,.,
0%
Task' 16
Comprehensive Plan Reports'& Drawings,
Task 17
GIS. Implementation ...
Task 18
Space Utilization Study
30%
o14ASE 4. TOTAL
17%
TOTAL PROJECT
. 45'%'
Submi d by;
Joseph A. Pobiner, AlCP
Director of Community Planning
The HOK Planning Group
/rm
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
Architecture, Engineering, Planning, Interiors,
Graphics, Facilities Consulting
Weekly Project Progress Report
to: Jane`'Kee; AIcP (Cdy'':of CollegeStatlon)
Donal Simpson, AICP (HOK)
Tim Terry (HOK)
Gary Jost, PE (B-A)
Mike McKay, PE (CDM)
Project File (94-317-122)
from: Joseph A. Pobiner, AICP
6688 North Central Expressway, Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75206-3912
Telephone: 214 739 6688 Fax: 214 373 9523
date: 14 April 1995
period: 10-14 "April 1995
project: College Station Comprehensive Plan,
HOK Project #94-317-122
it ieli i udb „e i,inentl I,ulili IiY bl L,i Lli , ,Iill �11[ idly 6 h 111 11 AIILI I 1 11. 1 i I I I I i I I Id 1 .1111 1 . ", 11"1 Jl
1) Project Activity:
Phase 1-- Ongoing
Phase 2 HOK staff in College Station week of 10 April - field surveys now complete.
Housing'nap being prepared. HOK working with City staff to receive digital topographic
data files for incorporation.
Phase 3 -
• Water - CDM is entering processing land use and service area data to assign flows
to nodes in the system. Evaluations have been added to the system nodes. Water
use summary for the past 3 years has been entered to determine breakdowns
between residential and commercial demand.
• Wastewater - CDM is continuing with manhole entry and service area development.
Phase 4 - (no activity yet)
Additional Services:
• Space Utilization Analysis - Ongoing.
2) Project Meetings:
None during this week.
3) Areas of Concern:
None at this time.
Offices in:
New York -Washington, D.C. • Greenville,SC - Atlanta - Tampa/Orlando - St. Louis - Dallas - Houston • Mexico City • Kansas City •San Francisco •Los Angeles • 'rokyo •Hong Kong • Berlin • London
4
Hellmudi, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
Architecture, Engineering, Planning, Interiors,
Graphics, Facilities Consulting
Weekly Project Progress Deport
to: Jane Kee, AICP (City of College Station)
Donal Simpson, AICP (HOK)
Tim Terry (HOK)
Gary Jost, PE (B-A)
Mike McKay, PE (CDM)
Project File (94-317-122)
from- Incanh A PnhinPr- AMP
6688 North Central Expressway, Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75206-3912
Telephone: 214 739 6688 Fax: 214 373 9523
1) Project Activity:
Phase - Ongoing
Phase 2 - Analysis of hosing condition completed and report, sent to Jane Kee (19 April).
Housing condition map digitized and will be transmitted to City week of 24 April.
Phase 3 -
• Water - CDM is entering processing land use and service area data to assign flows
to nodes in the system. Evaluations have been added to the system nodes. Water
use summary for the past 3 years has been entered to determine breakdowns
between residential and commercial demand.
• Wastewater- CDM is continuing with,manhole entry and, service area development.
Phase 4 - (no activity yet)
Additional Services:
• Space Utilization Analysis - Ongoing.
2) Project Meetings:
None during this week.
3) Areas of Concern:
None at this time.
Offices in:
New York • Washington. D,C, - Creenville,SC • Atlanta • Tampa/Orlando • St. Louis • Dallas • Houston'- Mexico City • Kansas Cite • San Francisco -Los Angeles •Tokyo •Hong Kong •Berlin • London
1
Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
Architecture, Engineering, Planning, Interiors,
Graphics, Facilities Consulting
Weekly Project Progress Report
to: ftaRAAKe
Donal Simpson, AICP (HOK)
Tim Terry (HOK)
Gary Jost, PE (B-A)
Mike McKay, PE (CDM)
Project File (94-317-122)
from: Joseph A. Pobiner, AICP
6688 North Central Expressway, Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75206-3912
Telephone: 214 739 6688 Fax: 214 373 9523
date: 28 April 1995
period: 24-28 April 1995
project: College Station Comprehensive Plan
HOK Project #94-317-122 _
1) Project Activity:
Phase 1 - Ongoing
Phase 2 Housing condition analysis complete. Maps to be transmitted to City week of
1 May. Topographic analysis 85% complete.--- ,--
Phase 3 -. .,, .....:
• Water - CDM is entering processing land ,use and service area data to assign flows
to nodes in the system. Evaluations have been added to the system nodes. Water
use summary for the past 3 years has been entered to determine breakdowns
between residential and commercial demand.
,.Wastewater- CDM is continuing with manhole; entry and,service area development.
Phase 4 (noactivity yet)
Additional Services:
Space Utilization Analysis = Presented draft report to City Council 27 April. Final report
to be submitted after City comments received and addressed.
2) Project Meetings:
None during this week.
3) Areas of Concern:
None at this time.
Offices in:
RF,EIVED MAY i
.. .. ..•r.. . r .. c_....:....... 1 .... .......1.... •r.,4..,.. I I...... Knnu .Poulin •London
]Hellmuth, Ohata & Kassahaum, Inc.
Architecture, Engineering, Planning, Interiors,
Graphics, Facilities Consulting
Weekly Project Progress Report
to: w
l�►rte,KaiCtl` tatty of �Coffe5,
Donal Simpson, AICP (HOK)
Tim Terry (HOK)
Gary Jost, PE (S-A)
Mike McKay, PE (CDM)
Project File (94-317-122)
from: Joseph A. Pobiner, AICP
date: 28 April 1995
period.- 24-28 April 1995
6688 North Central Expressway, Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75206-3912
Telephone: 214 739 6688 Fax: 214 373 9523
project: College Station Comprehensive Plan
HOK Project #94-317-122
LA.,.YId.�;Il Flub i4iwii iel iF�l w o i i u u iqulmnI., inm n 11AIN Jill 11, p,II I,11uu Jl J.,,.II .111 enYniwiIll"I uia ".l11li.IIJIW.,ill. Iill lill 1J,I'll milu11, nl,1 Jui.. i 1111. 411Y,01,Nia,lll
1 1) Project Activity:
Phase 1 - Ongoing
Phase 2 - Housing condition analysis complete. Maps to be transmitted to City week of
1 May. Topographic analysis 85% complete.
Phase 3 -
Water - CDM is entering processing land use and service area data to assign flows
to nodes in the system. Evaluations have been added to the system nodes. Water
use summary for the past 3 years has been entered to determine breakdowns
between residential and commercial demand.
• Wastewater - CDM is continuing with manhole entry and service area development.
Phase 4 - (no activity yet)
Additional Services:
• Space Utilization Analysis - Presented draft report to City Council 27 April. Final report
to be submitted after City comments received and addressed.
2) Project Meetings:
None during this week.
3) Areas of Concern:
None at this time.
pECE1\1ED MAY 1 15 5
Offices in;
\mv York - Washington. D.C. - Greenville.SC - Atlanta - Tampa/Orlando - St. Louis - Dallas - Houston • Mexico City - Kansas Cite - San Francisco - Los Angeles - Tokvo - Hong Kong - Berlin - London
Hellinuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
Architecture, Engineering, Planning, Interiors,
Graphics, Facilities Consulting
Monthly Project Progress .Deport
to: �xJ °E07 •0 'l MIP Sege. Staslio�n)
Donal Simpson, AICP (HOK)
Tim Terry (HOK)
Gary Jost, tar= (B-A)
Mike McKay, PE (CDM)
Project File (94-317-122)
from: Joseph A. Pobiner, AICP
date: 30 April 1995
period: 1-30 April 1995
6688 North Central Expressway, Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75206-3912
Telephone: 214 739 6688 Fax: 214 373 9523
project. College Station Comprehensive Plan
HOK Project #94-317-122
hip 4.,1 I I I II I x IIY I I „bill idI I.,II I I I I I I I III 6I1I111411Yl Ia INNINN�
1) Project Activity:
Phase 1" - Ongoing 1
Phase 2 - HOK staff in College "Station week of 10 April to complete housing condition
surrey/count. Housing condition analysistcount completed and report sent to Jane Kee 19
April. Housing condition map 90% digitized (to be transmitted to City week of 1 May). All
opportunities and constraints digitized with the exception of topography (slope analysis
approximately 85% complete).
Phase 3 -
• Water - CDM entered pipe and system data into model, developed an outline for the
water section of the final report and draft introduction, and processed land use and
service area data to assign flows to nodes in the system. Evaluations added to the
system nodes. Water use summary for the past 3 years entered to determine
breakdowns between residential and commercial demand.
• Wastewater- CDM identified service area connections for entry into the model, entered
pipe data received from the City (about 750 pipes), continued with manhole entry and
service area development, and is about 80% complete with digitizing the existing land
use data.
Phase 4 - (no activity yet)
Additional Services:
• Space Utilization Analysis - HOK staff presented draft report to City Council 27 April.
Final report to be submitted after City comments received and addressed.
2) Project Meetings:
None during this week.
Offices in:
All -MI., Tnkcn . .
_ Hnnq Knn� - Berlm • l.ondnn
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Post Office Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77842-9960
(409) 764-3500
April 5, 1995
Dr. Ray M. Bowen, President
Texas A&M University
805 Rudder Tower
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843-1246
Dear Dr. Bowen:
The City of College Station City Council is interested in working with Texas A&M
University on a joint park and roadway project in the vicinity of West Holleman.
At present time, the City staff has discussed this possible venture with mid -level
management at Texas A&M University and so far, the reaction has been largely
positive.
The Council has placed the development of a park and roadway facilities in this
area high on its list of priorities. We believe that creating a neighborhood park in
this area will benefit both A&M and the City of College Station.
I appreciate your consideration of this matter and would be more than happy to
answer any questions you have. I look forward to discussing this with you at
your convenience. Please feel free to call my office at 764-3541.
Sincerely,
Larry R n
Mayor
cc: Dr. Jerry Gaston
Dr. Rick Floyd
Tom Brymer
John Woody
Cathy Locke
Glenn Schroeder
Steve Beachy
Elrey Ash
Home of Texas A&Mi University
2
Saint Michaelffs Academy
Thanks You
Dear College Station Pariks & Rec,
Thanks to you and our other
contributors, we had a very successful
"Evemong In Tuscany" on Aprft I st. With
your donations the event ralosed $9400
in scholarsho funds. We appreciate your
IP
support of our effort to offer deserving
students the SMA "expenlencelu and
highly successfid classical cumculum.
We hope you will consider J0011MIng us
I
again next year. Again, we thank you.
sloncerely,
SMA Auction Committee
COMMISSIONERS
LEE M.BASS
Chairman, Ft. Worth
WALTER UMPHREY
Vice -Chairman
Beaumont
MICKEY BURLESON
Temple
RAY CLYMER
Wichita Falls
YGNACIO D. GARZA
Brownsville
RICHARD (D(CK) HEATH
Dallas
TERESE TARLTON HERSHEY
Houston
SUSAN HOWARD-CHRANE
Boerne
NOLAN RYAN
Alvin
PERRY R. BASS
Chairman -Emeritus
Ft. Worth
p �E �A
TEXAS
PARKS AND WOLDLO FE DEPARTMENT
4200 Smith School Road o Austin, Texas 78744 o 512-389-4800
April 24, 1995
Mr. Steve Beachy
Director, Parks and Recreation
P. O. Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842-9960
Re: Wolf Pen Creek Phase I
Project Number 20-00329
Dear Mr. Beachy:
ANDREW SANSOM
Executive Director
We have noted your annual status report for the
referenced project. Your efforts to maintain and operate
this facility for your citizens are commendable.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sin rely
im Hogsett
Chief
Grants -In -Aid
TH:RAM: lb
IMugu
111111
April 24, 1995
College Station Parks and Recreation
1000 Krenek Tap Rd.
College Station, Tx 77845
Dear Sir or madam,
The Laboratory employees of the Scott & White Clinic would like to
thank you for your donation of the yardsticks and coffee mugs.
We had a wonderful luncheon for Lab Week and culminated the affair
by drawing for door prizes donated by local merchants.
The yardsticks and mugs were given by drawing to 11 employees of
the laboratory. The yardsticks were especially coveted by
everyone; its a clever idea.
Thank you so much for helping make National Laboratory Week
special.
Sincerely,
QA—� j 71a—D OL—0—
Alicia Gale
Supervisor Scott & White Laboratory
SCOTT & WHITE CLINIC COLLEGE STATION
An Association Affiliated CLINIC
With Scott and White
Memorial Hospital and
Scott, Sherwood and
Brindley Foundation
1600 University Drive Last College Station, Texas 77840 409/691-3300
Post-It"routing request pad 7664
ROUTING m REQUEST
Please
❑ READ To rv— Lf�il�
v
❑ HANDLE -,
❑ APPROVE ltld�-i
and
❑ FORWARD
❑ RETURN
❑ KEEP OR DISCARD
❑ R VIEW WITH ME
Date2�7 • From
Thank you for your business. We are glad to be of service to you. Please help us to
serve you better by rating your experience at the College Station Conference Center.
Was your event handled in a satisfactory manner? Yes _No
If no, please tell us what problems you encountered.
2. Was your. overall experience at the College Station Conference Center:
Below Expectations Above Expectations
(check only one box)
1 2 3 4
0 O 0 V
3. We would also bepleased Mohave any comments yqu may wis to make:
=�� vent:
you, Collegotation Conference Center St
Kids Klub Parent Survey
Survey conducted 4/6/95 - 4/10/95
Twenty-two children left the Kids Klub program between January 1 and
April 1, 1995. Staff attempted to survey these families by phone. All but
two families were contacted. Below you will find the survey results and the
number of students from each site.
Rock Prairie 7 Oakwood/Willow Branch 5
College Hills 1 Southwood Valley 4
South Knoll 5
Survey recorded by: Stephanie Anderson
Results compiled by: Jana Bishop
Reason for leaving Kids Klub:
To save money.
* Felt staff needed more training in first aid; blood borne pathogens.
* Wanted child to learn to stay home alone with older brother.
* Father no longer working overtime and is home after school.
* Oldest son now at home because football season is over.
" Wanted her to start learning the responsibility of being home alone.
* Moved
* Money
* Mother took a part time job so she could spend more time with child
after school.
# Moved to Bryan district.
* Mother quit work to be at home with child.
* Brother at home, live one block away and can walk home.
* Grandmother staying with them, wants him to spend more time with
her.
* Wanted to do taekwondo full time; couldn't afford to do both.
* Divorce; children moved to Oklahoma.
* # disconnected.
* # disconnected.
* Children moved to Oregon.
* Child thought he was too old for Kids Klub.
* Father was going to be home during those hours; he wanted to be
with son.
* Mother home with new baby.
What could we have done to better serve vou?
* More training in first aid.
* Feel it is an excellent program.
Really enjoyed the program.
# No problems.
No problems, enjoyed the program.
# The program was fine.
Program was great.
# No real problems with Kids Klub.
Michael loved it.
Was a wonderful program -no problems.
# No problems. -
No problems.
Liked the program.
Do you feel that Kids Klub tuition is reasonable?
# Yes, but felt was paying too much considering children only there for
an hour and a half each day.
Yes, just had personal financial problems.
Yes
Were you vleased with the relationship the staff established with your
child?
Yes, but they should take their job more seriously than they do, and
be more careful in the things they do.
Yes
# Yes
Did vour child en iov attending Kids Klub? Whv/Whv not?
Yes
Yes, would ask parents to wait until 5:45 pm to pick her up.
She asks me to go back to work so she can return to Kids Klub.
# Yes
Was a wholly positive experience.
* Yes
Comments:
Blood borne pathogen training should be more than 5 minutes and
should be taken more seriously. Need to explain why receiving
training so staff will take issue more seriously.
Wish we had known about it earlier; had been here a year before we
found out about program.
* Considering re -enrolling.
# Have used Kids Klub since first year had it; no problem. Enjoyed
program.
Mr. Beckwith seemed very pleased with the program and thought this
survey was a good idea.
Only concern was that child came home several times "banged up a
little", but that it probably was unavoidable. Possibly too many kids
actively playing in closed area. Offer possibility of child being
enrolled only 2 or 3 days a week or a "drop -in" type program.
95% chance Michael will return to Kids Klub in the fall.
Withdrawal had nothing to do with your program.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PARKS & RECREATION
POST OFFICE BOX 9960
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842.9960
(409)764-3773
MEMORti,1\ D V M
May 1, 1995
To: Charlie Shear, Assistant Director of Mmanagement Services
From: Eric Ploeger, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation
Subject: Facility Maintanence
Charlie, I would like to take the opportunity to thank you and your staff for the effort put
forth in adding PARR structures to your Facility Maintenance activities. The planning
work between your staff and the PARD staff began about a year ago. Visible results are
now well underway. This partnership will yield great results for the Parks Department
user groups and go a long way toward preserving important infrastructure. Budget
preparation time will also be reduced.
Your staffs efforts are always positive, professional, and effective. Thanks!
Copies: Linda Piwonka, Executive Director, Management Services Group
Steve Beachy, Director of Parks and Recreation
We provide good things in life!
May 1, 1995
Mr. Steve Beachy
Manager of Parks & Recreation
1101 Texas Avenue South
College Station, TX 77845
Dear Mr. Beachy:
Just a note to thank you for all of the outstanding support College Station Parks &
Recreation Department gave us in conducting the First Annual Children's Fest on April
22nd. Sheila Walker and her staff were simply outstandingt ! We could not have done
it without them.
As you know, more than 3,500 people attended the event, even though the
weather was not conducive to outdoor activities. We hope to make the event an annual
affair and look forward to working with you, Sheila and the others in your Department
on other projects in the future.
If there is anything we can do for you, please don't hesitate to call on us.
Best personal regards,
cc: Tom Brymer, Interim City Manager
1101 Texas Avenue South
College Station, TX 77845
KKYS (FM) - P.O. Box 4132 • Bryan, Texas 77805-4132
(409) 823-5597 FAX (409) 823-7578
)odd
qA-- I-+- -DI) U :-�-
1-�
a -2 1 J6
WrH -P
)10
uoJTO
/
/
I
/
/
I
JACK FIELDS RECEIVED APR 1 COMMITTEE ON
8TH DISTRICT, TExAs COMMERCE
SUBCOMMITTEE ON
_.. ni��i'�� ����i'� C,"�G�i�11✓ TELEACHAIRMANEIONS
jboua of Repregentatibo Waobtngton, ;3 C 20515-4308
March 24, 1995
The Honorable Larry J. Ringer
Mayor
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842-0960
Dear Mayor Ringer:
Thank you for expressing your views on funding cuts affecting
summer youth programs. As I'm sure you know, there are numerous summer
programs for young people which are administered by various agencies and
departments of the federal government. If you will provide me with more
details including numbers and titles of the legislation calling for
these cut, I will be able to provide a more complete response to your
concerns.
Thank you again. I look forward to your further correspondence.
With all best wishes, I am
Si cer y,
C FIELDS
e r of Congress
JF:rf �,V b �/.e
D
C EE ,
PLEASE RESPOND TO:
❑ 2228 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING ❑ 9810 FM 1960 BYPASS WEST ❑ 300 WEST DAVIS ❑' 111 EAST UNIVERSf1Y DRIVE
WASHINGTON, DC 20515 SurrE 165 Sun 507 SUITE 216
(202) 2254901 DEERBROOx PLAZA NATIONSBANK CONROE NATIONSBANK A&M
HUMBLE, TX 77338-3599 CONROE, TX 77301 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840
(713)54"000 (409)756-8044 (409)846-6068
Fax: (713) 540-7233 Fax: (409) 756-8696 Fax: (409) 846-6275
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION[
LINCOLN RECREATION CENTER
POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1000 ELEANOR
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960
(409) 764.3779
April 24, 1995
Ms. Cindy Swords
National Safety Associates
P 0 Box 752270
Memphis, TX 381.75-2270
Dear Ms. Swords:
Thank you for purchasing the new NSA Family Encyclopedias for the Lincoln
Recreation Center.
We believe the students, community, and staff will enjoy the current information
contained inside these visually detailed encyclopedias. We were certainly
appreciative of your commitment to provide quality information for our tutorial
program.
We have returned the owner registration cards so that we can remain informed on
the updates to the encyclopedias. Thank you for your generosity and prompt
response to our request. We will remember your generosity for years to come.
Respectfully,
Kimmie Habterniclieal
Lincoln Center Supervisor
May 9, 1995
Blaine Buenger
3322 Bluestem Circle
College Station, TX 77845
Stephen Beachy
Director
College Station Parks and Recreation
PO Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842-9960
Dear Mr. Beachy:
I am writing this letter in appreciation for the excellent services provided by College Station Parks
and Recreation. For the past few years, my wife and I have thoroughly enjoyed the beautiful parks
which abound in our area. Now that we have a one-year old child, we appreciate even more the
well -kept, easily accessible, and superbly designed settings which these parks provide.
Having searched other cities and towns of various sizes, it is safe to say that College Station's
parks and recreational facilities are a cut above the rest. At our present location, we have at least
six park & recreational areas within about a 5 mile radius -- Bee Creek, Lemon Tree, Southwood
Athletic Park, Central Park, Brothers Pond, and Cy Miller. In fact, there seem to be numerous
locations readily available in all areas of College Station.
We have been fortunate enough to take advantage of these opportunities: playing basketball, trout
fishing, and swimming; letting our little girl enjoy the fields, swing -sets, and ducks; reserving a
group shelter for an outdoor party; and simply walking along scenic paths, enjoying the greenery
and quiet setting -- whatever the case (and this is not an exhaustive list), we have been able to do
so in welcome, attractive surroundings.
All this is to say that your services have played a major role in making College Station a pleasant
home for us. Thank you for your contribution. Your hard work is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Blaine Buenger