HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/19/2021 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionCollege Station, TX
Meeting AgendaPlanning and Zoning Commission
1101 Texas Ave, College Station, TX 77840Internet: https://zoom.us/j/96919263533 Phone: 888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 969 1926 3533
The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting.
August 19, 2021 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, TX Page 1
This meeting will offer both in-person and remote participation following both the City’s
Guidelines for in-person, virtual attendance, and the speaker protocol in the agenda. The city
uses a third-party vendor to help host the meeting and if the call-in number is not functioning
access will be through the internet link only.
1.Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
2.Hear Visitors.
At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on
issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. An individual who wishes to address the
Commission regarding any item on the agenda shall register with the Commission Secretary prior to
4 p.m. on the day of the meeting. To register, the individual must provide a name and phone number
by calling 979.764.3751 or emailing khejny@cstx.gov prior to 4 p.m. To submit written comments to
the Commission, email khejny@cstx.gov and they will be distributed to the Commission. The visitor
presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to
address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The
Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or w ill place the matter
on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and
address for the record.)
3.Informational
3.1.Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
3.2.Discussion of Minor / Amending Plats approved by Staff.
Waters Edge Subdivision; Block 1, Lots 1 & 2 ~ Case #FPCO2021-000003
Sponsors:Alma Guerra
3.3.Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the City's proposed Thoroughfare Plan.
Sponsors:Jason Schubert
Attachments:1.Thoroughfare Map Book
2.Bicycle Map Book
3.Pedestrian Map Book
Page 1 of 100
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 2 August 19, 2021
3.4.Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
Thursday, August 26, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open
Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison - Osborne)
Thursday, September 2, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting and Impact Fee Advisory Committee
(IFAC) Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
Thursday, September 9, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open
Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison - Mirza)
Thursday, September 16, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m
3.5.Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor
Board.
4.Consent Agenda
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be
enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found
compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved
with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items,
citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda
may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on
the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
4.1.Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Attachments:1.August 5 2021
4.2.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Winding Creek Estates
Phase 4 on approximately 25.3 acres, generally located northeast of the intersection of
Stousland Road and Big Trail in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Case
#FP2020-000038
Sponsors:Alma Guerra
Attachments:1.Staff Report
2.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
3.Final Plat
5.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
6.Regular Agenda
Page 2 of 100
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 3 August 19, 2021
6.1.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundary from R Rural to WC Wellborn Commercial on approximately one acre
located in the Benjamin Graham Subdivision, Block B, Lots 1-6, generally located at 14889-
14895 FM 2154. Case #REZ2021-000005 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at
the August 26, 2021, City Council Meeting – Subject to change).
Sponsors:Jesse Dimeolo
Attachments:1.Staff Report
2.Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map
3.Future Land Use Map
4.Rezoning Map
5.Rezoning Exhibit
6.Background Information
7.Applicant's Supporting Information
6.2.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map from Suburban Commercial to
Urban for approximately 10 acres, generally located at 1660 Graham Road. Case #CPA2021-
000002 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 9, 2021 City Council
Meeting- Subject to change.)
Sponsors:Rachel Lazo
Attachments:1.Staff Report
2.Vicinity Aerial and Small Area Maps
3.Comprehensive Plan Exhibit
4.Background Information
5.Applicant Supporting Information
6.Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map
6.3.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundary from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District on approximately
10 acres of land generally located at 1660 Graham Road. Case # REZ2021-000006 (Note:
Final action of this item will be considered at the September 9, 2021 City Council Meeting –
Subject to change).
Sponsors:Rachel Lazo
Attachments:1.Staff Report
2.Vicinity Aerial and Small Area Maps
3.Background Information
4.Rezoning Map
5.Rezoning Exhibit
6.Applicants Supporting Information
7.Concept Plan
8.Bulk Variances Letter
Page 3 of 100
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 4 August 19, 2021
7.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent
meeting.
8.Adjourn.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed
on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on August 13, 2021 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun."Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 4 of 100
August 19, 2021
Item No. 3.3.
Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the City's Thoroughfare Plan.
Sponsor:Jason Schubert
Reviewed By CBC:N/A
Agenda Caption:Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the City's proposed Thoroughfare
Plan.
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
Financial Sustainability
Core Services & Infrastructure
Diverse & Growing Economy
Improving Mobility
Recommendation(s): Receive presentation and provide direction to staff.
Summary: As requested at the 8/5/21 P&Z meeting, staff will present on the proposed changes to
the City's Thoroughfare Plan.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1.Thoroughfare Map Book
2.Bicycle Map Book
3.Pedestrian Map Book
Page 5 of 100
Page 6 of 100
Overview & Map Book Guide
This Map Book identifies proposed changes to the Thoroughfare Map based on the Comprehensive Plan Update. It anticipates a full future buildout of College Station within the city
limits and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (a 5-mile boundary outside of city limits). Future thoroughfares may be constructed by the City through the City’s capital improvement program or
through private development as development occurs. The future envisioned on this map may or may not fully occur based on growth trends, City and private development decisions, and
feasibility.
This Map Book includes the following pages as described below:
1)A table of proposed changes numbered based on the grid location in the Map Book. All proposed changes have been assigned a number and have a corresponding description.
•Two types of changes that have been identified:
a)Proposed Amendments are revisions to the existing Thoroughfare Plan based on community and stakeholder input, changing conditions, and best practices.
b)Potential Alternatives are possible amendments that are being further evaluated and are included to allow for initial feedback.
•The proposed changes have also been grouped into the following categories:
a)Add Existing Street – These are streets currently constructed or function as a thoroughfare and are proposed to be reflected on the thoroughfare network.
b)Create New Street – These are new street connections that can provide alternate routes in the thoroughfare network. Some new streets are provided as potential
alternatives that are being further evaluated and included for feedback.
c)Downgrade – These are existing thoroughfares being reclassified from Major Collector to Minor Collector. They consist mostly of thoroughfares within the core of the
City that are being changed to reflect existing conditions where future widening is not feasible or necessary to meet future traffic demands.
d)Realign – These changes involve the modification to the planned alignment of a future thoroughfare to better address design constraints or thoroughfare alignments.
e)Reclassify – These changes involve classification to upgrade or downgrade a thoroughfare for those not included in the Downgrade type.
f)Remove – These existing or planned thoroughfares are proposed to be removed from the plan as they involve dead ends or modifications resulting from other
thoroughfare changes. Some thoroughfares are being explored for potential removal as their feasibility is further evaluated.
2)A legend that describes the different types of throughfares.
3)Two Citywide maps including the existing Thoroughfare Map and the proposed Thoroughfare Map. These maps have a grid with related page numbers to review these areas in
more detail on the pages that follow.
4)Detailed grid pages with a side-by-side comparison of the existing Thoroughfare Map and the proposed Thoroughfare Map.
Comments & Questions:
Jason Schubert
Transportation Planning Coordinator
Phone: 979-764-3570
Email: jschubert@cstx.gov
Page 7 of 100
Legend
Freeway/Expressway A controlled access highway which can carry extremely heavy volumes of vehicular traffic and provides
connections to regional destinations outside the City and other areas of the State.
6 Lane Major Arterial A street which can carry high volumes of vehicular traffic in the general range of 20,000 to 60,000 vehicles
per day and which is intended to move traffic in, out or around the City.
4 Lane Major Arterial A street which can carry high volumes of vehicular traffic in the general range of 15,000 to 40,000 vehicles
per day and which is intended to move traffic in, out or around the City.
Minor Arterial A street which can carry high volumes of vehicular traffic in the general range of 5,000 to 30,000 vehicles
per day and which is intended to move traffic around the City.
Major Collector A street which primarily serves vehicular traffic from residential streets and minor collectors to arterials in
the general range of 5,000 to 10,000 vehicles per day.
Minor Collector A street which primarily serves vehicular traffic from residential streets to collectors or arterials in the
general range of 1,000 to 5,000 vehicles per day.
Grade Separation The vertical separation of two intersecting streets so that traffic flow does not cross each other, typically
achieved through an overpass or underpass.
Page 8 of 100
Proposed Amendments
Number Street Name From To Current Plan Proposed Plan Rationale
1 Maple Ave Wellborn Rd First St n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street as concept was proposed in Northgate Operations Plan. Provides opportunity to create direct route between College
Main and Wellborn Rd.
2 Maple Ave
extension First St Cherry St n/a Minor Collector Create New Street as extension was proposed in Northgate Operations Plan. Provides opportunity to create direct route between College
Main and Wellborn Rd.
3 Cherry St Boyett St Second St
(plus curve)Minor Collector n/a Remove from plan as it is replaced by extension of Maple St into Cherry St.
4 Foster Ave Lincoln Ave George Bush Dr E Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade as is local street width with parking removed on both sides. Widening to add continuous center turn lane not anticipated.
5 Nunn St Lincoln Ave Walton Dr n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street that functions as collector with connecting Lincoln Ave and Walton Dr.
6 Munson Ave Lincoln Ave Dominik Dr n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street that functions as a collector. Street was reconstructed in 2017. Traffic calming measures are being evaluated.
7 Wellborn Rd University Dr George Bush Dr E 6-lane Major
Arterial
4-lane Major
Arterial Reclassify as 4-lane Major Arterial. Widening not feasible due to right-of-way limitations between railroad and Texas A&M buildings.
8 George Bush Dr E Texas Ave Dominik Dr Major Collector Minor Arterial Reclassify as Minor Arterial since it is constructed with 4 lanes and raised center median.
9 Brazoswood Dr SH 6 Glenhaven Dr Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade as is Minor Collector and need for continuous center turn lane not anticipated.
10 Glenhaven Dr Domink Dr Brazoswood Dr Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade as is Minor Collector and need for continuous center turn lane not anticipated.
11 Dominik Dr Munson Ave Glenhaven Dr Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade as was reconstructed in 2005 and has parking removed on one side. Widening to add continuous center turn lane not feasible.
Traffic calming measure are being evaluated.
12 Merry Oaks Dr University Oaks
Blvd Dominik Dr n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street that is constructed with Minor Collector width.
13 Scarlett Ohara Dr Harvey Rd University Oaks Blvd n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street that is constructed with Minor Collector width.
14 Switch Station Rd SH 6 Appomattox Dr Minor Collector n/a Remove from plan as would provide some connectivity but has limited benefit.
15 Colgate Dr Central Park Ln Eastmark Dr Minor Collector n/a Remove from plan as Minor Collector classifications end at Eastmark Dr.
16 Timber St George Bush Dr Park Place Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade as is existing Minor Collector street and has dedicated left turn lane at George Bush Dr. Need for continuous center turn lane not
anticipated.
17 Park Place Timber St Glade St Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade as street is being reconstructed by City capital project with Minor Collector width.
18 Park Place Glade St Anderson St n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street since provides collector connection to/from schools and has dedicated turn lane at intersection with Anderson St.
19 Glade St Park Place Southwest Pkwy Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade as is Minor Collector and need for continuous center turn lane not anticipated.
20 Holleman Dr W Harvey Mitchell
Pkwy Jones Butler Rd Minor Arterial Major Collector Downgrade as need for expansion to 4 lanes not anticipated due to connectivity to be provided by planned Jones Butler Rd extension under
Harvey Mitchell Pkwy.
21 North Dowling Rd Holleman Dr S Junction Boys Rd n/a Major Collector Add Existing Street to retain connection to Holleman Dr S and planned Jones Butler Rd extension.
22 Navarro Dr Wellborn Rd Welsh Ave n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street that is constructed with Minor Collector width.
23 Emerald Pkwy Bent Oak St terminus Major Collector n/a Remove portion past Bent Oak St as street becomes private.
24 Airline Dr Longmire Dr Southwood Dr n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street that is constructed with Minor Collector width.
25 Sebesta Rd SH 6 Pavillion Ave Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade as Minor Collector and need for continuous center turn lane not anticipated.
26 Southwood Dr Todd Trail terminus Minor Collector n/a Remove dead end street portion south of intersection with Todd Trail.
27 Normand Dr Rock Prairie Rd Ponderosa Dr n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street that is constructed with Minor Collector width.
28 Towers Pkwy
extension Cain Rd Holleman Dr S n/a Minor Collector Create New Street by extending Towers Pkwy to intersect Holleman Dr S at Kenyon Dr. This would replace Cain Rd as thoroughfare
connection to Holleman Dr S.
29 Cain Rd Towers Pkwy Holleman Dr S Minor Collector n/a Remove from plan as being replaced by Towers Pkwy extension to Holleman Dr S.
30 Bridle Gate Dr SH 6 Longmire Dr n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street that is constructed with Minor Collector width.
31 Brandenburg Ln Graham Rd Eagle Ave n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street that is constructed with Minor Collector width.
32 Brewster Dr William D Fitch
Pkwy WS Phillips Pkwy n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street that is constructed slightly wider than a local street and functions as a collector.
Table of Proposed Thoroughfare Changes
Page 9 of 100
Proposed Amendments
Number Street Name From To Current Plan Proposed Plan Rationale
33 Brewster Dr WS Phillips Pkwy McCullough Rd Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade as part has been constructed with Minor Collector width and would become consistent with McCullough Rd as Minor Collector
classification.
34 Corporate Pkwy William D Fitch
Pkwy
2,000 feet northwest
of William D Fitch
Pkwy
Major Collector Major Collector Realign to Spearman Dr extension at William D Fitch Pkwy as preliminary engineering report determined aligning to Pebble Creek Pkwy is
not feasible to meet US Army Corps of Engineers requirements.
35 Gateway Blvd SH 6 Lakeway Dr n/a Major Collector Add Existing Street that is constructed as a Major Collector with a raised center median.
36 Old Royder Rd Victoria Ave Royder Rd n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street that provides a collector connection between Victoria Ave and Royder Rd.
37 Woodlake Dr Victoria Ave Arrington Rd
extension Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade as future traffic demand not anticipated to necessitate a continuous center turn lane.
38 Future Collector Royder Rd Future Collector Minor Collector n/a Remove from plan as collector would provide limited connectivity in an area designated as Rural outside the City limits.
39 Future Collector Royder Rd 2,500 feet southeast
of Royder Rd Major Collector Major Collector Realign to the north to remove current offset at Royder Rd with future collector to the east.
40 Future Collector Riva Ridge Rd Royder Road Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade due to Rural context outside City limits and future traffic demand not anticipated to necessitate a Major Collector.
41 Riva Ridge Rd Woodlake Dr Calumet Trail n/a Minor Collector Add Existing Street to relocate future collector that was planned across developed residential lots to an existing street.
42 Future Collector Woodlake Dr Riva Ridge Rd Major Collector n/a Remove future collector extension across developed lots and relocate connection to existing Riva Ridge Rd.
43 Future Collector WS Phillips Pkwy Woodlake Dr Major Collector Minor Collector Downgrade as street serves rural context and future volumes not anticipated to necessitate a Major Collector.
44 Future Collector Future Collector Arrington Rd
extension Minor Collector n/a Remove as is in close proximity to WS Phillips Pkwy and Woodlake Dr extensions. Topography on tract limits development/need for
collector.
Number Street Name From To Current Plan Proposed Plan Rationale
A Ash St extension Eisenhower St Texas Ave n/a Minor Collector Potential alternative to Create New Street connection between Texas Ave and Eisenhower Dr. Area designated as Urban Center on Future
Land Use and Character Map and connection could occur if properties redevelop in the future.
B Nimitz St University Dr E Lincoln Ave n/a Minor Collector Potential alternative to Add Existing Street. A traffic signal being installed on University Drive at Nimitz St and will likely increase usage of the
street. The change could be coupled with potential downgrade to Eisenhower St.
C George Bush Dr E Domink Dr Harvey Rd Major Collector Minor Arterial Potential alternative to Reclassify to Minor Arterial. Would enhance alternate route for Texas Ave between George Bush Dr and Harvey Rd.
D Post Oak Mall
Collector Harvey Rd Holleman Dr E n/a Minor Collector Potential altenative to Create New Street connection between Harvey Rd and Holleman Dr E. Area is designated as Urban Center on Future
Land Use and Character Map and connection could occur if property redevelops in some form in the future.
E Luther St W
extension
Harvey Mitchell
Pkwy North Dowling Rd Minor Arterial n/a Potential alternative to Remove Minor Arterial extension. TxDOT widening of Harvey Mitchell Pkwy includes overpass at Jones Butler Rd
which allows connection to Holleman Dr S. Jones Butler Rd corridor may provide sufficient alternate route.
F General Pkwy
extension
North Graham
Rd
William D Fitch Pkwy
extension Minor Collector n/a Potential alternative to Remove Minor Collector connection to William D Fitch Pkwy extension if it is removed from plan.
G William D Fitch
extension Wellborn Rd Rock Prairie Rd W 4-lane Major
Arterial n/a Potential alternative to Remove connection to Wellborn Rd at William D Fitch Pkwy. Feasibility over future grade separation is being
evaluated and may result is other changes to accommodate removal.
Potential Alternatives (these amendments are not yet proposed and are being further evaluated on the resulting benefits to the thoroughfare network)
Page 10 of 100
ROCKPRAIRIERD
TEX
A
S
A
V
S
TEX
A
S
A
V
VICTORIAAV
SH
6
SUNIVERSITYDRESOUTHWESTPWGEORGEBUSHDRHARVEYRDHO
L
L
EMAN
D
R
S
HOPESC
R
E
E
K
RDPEACHCREEKRDWILLIAM D FITCH PWHARVEYMITCHELL PW S
11 22
33 44
55 66 77
88 99
¹
0 105Miles
Existing Thoroughfare MapExisting Thoroughfare Map
Thoroughfare MapThoroughfare Map
6 Lane Major Arterial
4 Lane Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Freeway/Expressway
Potential Alternatives
Proposed Amendments
CSISD Property Parks
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Grade Separation
Page 11 of 100
ROCKPRAIRIERD
TEX
A
S
A
V
S
TEX
A
S
A
V
VICTORIAAV
SH
6
SUNIVERSITYDRESOUTHWESTPWGEORGEBUSHDRHARVEYRDHO
L
L
EMAN
D
R
S
HOPESC
R
E
E
K
RDPEACHCREEKRDWILLIAM D FITCH PWHARVEYMITCHELL PW S
11 22
33 44
55 66 77
88 99
¹
0 105Miles
Proposed Thoroughfare MapProposed Thoroughfare Map
Thoroughfare MapThoroughfare Map
6 Lane Major Arterial
4 Lane Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Freeway/Expressway
Potential Alternatives
Proposed Amendments
CSISD Property Parks
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Grade Separation
Page 12 of 100
C I T Y OFC I T Y OFB R Y ANB R Y AN
5
1 3
2
A
18
8 C
16
B 11
4
6
7
ANDERSONSTBROADMOORDRSPRINGLOE NORTH AVMUNSONAV
CARTERCREEKPW
TANGLEW
O
O
D
D
R
DOMINIK DRBRIAR O
A
K
S
D
R
TIMBERSTNROSEMARYDR FRANCIS DRNEW MAIN DRC
O
K
E
S
TLUBBOCK STLEWIS STBIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
T
FOSTERAV
OL
S
E
N
B
LCROSS STJOE ROUTT BLNA
G
L
E
S
T
INLOWBLCHERRYSTSP
E
N
C
E
S
TCHURCH AVUNIVERSITY OAKS BLGILCHRIST A V
PARKPLA CEHENSEL DRGEORGE BUSH DRTEX
A
S
A
VUNIVERSITY DRLINCOLN AVHOLLEMAN D R
S TE
X
A
S
A
V
TEX
A
S
A
V
S
W
ELLBORN
R
D
N HARVEY RDTAR
R
O
W
S
T
E
2
9
TH
S
T
C
A
V
I
T
T
A
V
RAYMONDSTOTZERPWEA
RL
RU
D
DERFW
S
UNIVERSITY
D
R E
SC
OLLEGE
A
V
HOLLEMAN DR EEVILLAMARIARDPage 1 of 9 See Page 2C I T Y OFC I T Y OFB R Y ANB R Y AN
5
1 3
2
A
18
8 C
16
B 11
4
6
7 WALTONDRANDERSONSTBROADMOORDRE NORTH AVTANGLEW
O
O
D
D
R
DOMINIK DRBRIAR O
A
K
S
D
R
FRANCIS DRNROSEMARYDRTIMBERST
S P R IN G L O
MUNSON
AV
CARTERCREEKPW
GEORGEBUSH
D
RE
C
O
K
E
S
TLUBBOCK STLEWIS STFOSTERAVCROSS STJOE ROUTT BLCHERRYSTSP
E
N
C
E
S
TCHURCH AVUNIVERSITY OAKS BLGILCHR IS T A V
PARKP LAC ENEW MAIN DROL
S
E
N
B
L
BIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
T
NA
G
L
E
S
T
INLOWBLHENSEL DRGEORGE BUSH DRUNIVERSITY DRTEX
A
S
A
VLINCOLN AVHOLLEMAN D R
S TE
X
A
S
A
V
TEX
A
S
A
V
S
W
ELLBORN
R
D
N HARVEY RDTAR
R
O
W
S
T
E
2
9
TH
S
T
C
A
V
I
T
T
A
V
RAYMONDSTOTZERPWEA
RL
RU
D
DER
FW
S
UNIVERSITY
D
R
E
SC
OLLEGE
A
V
HOLLEMAN DR EEVILLAMARIARDEXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 3¹
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
CoCS Greenways
CoCS Parks
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
6 Lane Major Arterial
4 Lane Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Freeway/Expressway Major Collector
Minor Collector
Grade Separation
Thoroughfare MapThoroughfare Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 13 of 100
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
V e t e ransV e t e ransP a rkP a rk
23
15
13
12
9
14
10
D
11 DOMINIK DRFRANCISD RMUNSONAV
KRENEK TAP RDCOLGATEDRNORTH FOREST PWRAI
N
T
R
E
E
D
RUNIVERSITYOAKS BLBRENTWO O D D RELIN
D
A
L
N
E
A
R
L
R
U
D
D
E
R
F
W
SUNIVERSITY DR EHOLLEMAN DR EHARVEY RDDART
MOU
T
H
S
T
TEX
A
S
A
V
S
Page 2 of 9See Page 1C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
V e t e ransV e t e ransP a rkP a rk
23
15
13
12
9
14
10
D
11 DOMINIK DRFRANCISDRCOLGATEDRMU
N
S
O
N
A
V
KRENEK TAP RDNORTH FOREST PWRAI
N
T
R
E
E
D
RUNIVERSITYOAKSBL
BRENTWO O D D RELIN
D
A
L
N
E
A
R
L
R
U
D
D
E
R
F
W
SUNIVERSITY DR EHOLLEMAN DR EHARVEY RDDART
MOU
T
H
S
T
TEX
A
S
A
V
S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 4¹
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
CoCS Greenways
CoCS Parks
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
6 Lane Major Arterial
4 Lane Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Freeway/Expressway Major Collector
Minor Collector
Grade Separation
Thoroughfare MapThoroughfare Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 14 of 100
17
18
16
21
20
22
7
19
E
ANDERSONST
DEXTERDR
GLADESTDEX
TERDRS
NU
E
C
ESDR
FAI
R
V
I
E
W
A
VMAR
ION
PUG
H
D
R
LUTHER ST WTIMBERST
N DOWLING RDPENBERTHY
BL
LANGFORDST
MO
N
T
C
L
A
I
R
A
V
CAIN RDQUAILRUNNAVARRODRHAINES DR
WEL
S
H
A
V
RE
S
E
A
R
CHPWBALCONESDRJOHNKIMBROUGHBLC
O
K
E
S
T
OL
S
E
N
B
L LEWIS STJOE ROUTT BLBIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
T
OLDMAIND R PARKPLA CE
DEACONDRH
OLLEMA N D R SGEORGEBUSHDRW
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
D HOLLEMAN DRGEORGE BUSH DR WTEXASAVS
HOLLEMANDR
WRAYMONDSTOTZERPW
FM
2
1
5
4
HAR
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
P
W
S
Page 3 of 9
See Page 1
See Page 417
18
16
21
20
22
7
19
E
ANDERSONSTDEXTERDR
GLADESTDEXTER
DRS
NU
E
C
ESDR
LUTHER ST WN DOWLINGRDTIMBERST
MAR
ION
PUG
H
D
R
FAI
R
V
I
E
W
A
V
PENBERTHY
BL
LANGFORDST
CAIN RDQ
U
A
I
L
RUNHAINES DR
RE
S
E
A
R
CHPWBALCONESDRMO
N
T
C
L
A
I
R
A
V
NAVARRODRWE
L
S
H
A
VJOHNKIMBROUGHBLLEWIS STJOE ROUTT BLOLDMAIND R
PARK PLACEC
O
K
E
S
T
OL
S
E
N
B
L
BIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
T
DEACONDRH
OLLEMA N D R SGEORGEBUSHDRW
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
D HOLLEMANDRGEORGE BUSH DR WTEXASAVS
HOLLEMANDR
WRAYMONDSTOTZERPW
FM
2
1
5
4
HARVEY MITC H ELL PW S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 5¹
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
CoCS Greenways
CoCS Parks
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
6 Lane Major Arterial
4 Lane Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Freeway/Expressway Major Collector
Minor Collector
Grade Separation
Thoroughfare MapThoroughfare Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 15 of 100
26
23
27
30
24 25
GRAHAM RDSOUTHW
O
ODDR
PO N D ERO SADRW O O D C R E E K DRBROTHERSBLRIO
G
R
A
N
D
E
B
L
E M ER A LD PWKRENEK TAP RDFROSTD R
AIRLINEDRARNO LDRDSEBESTA RDNORTH FOREST PWVALLEYVIEWDRLANGFO
R
D
S
T
NAVARRODRGUADALUPEDR
BALCONESDRFO
X
F
I
R
E
D
R
TODDTRSAND S TONE D R
MEDICALAVBIRMINGHAM RDAPPOMATTOXDRBRENTWO O D D REDEACONDRCORSAIRDRTEX
A
S
A
V
S
S
H
6
S
DART
MOUTHST
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
S
T
E
ARL
RUDDERFWSROCKPRAIRIERDHARVEYMITCHELLPWSPage 4 of 9
See Page 2
See Page 326
23
27
30
24 25
GRAHAM RDPO N D ERO SADRW O O D C R E E K DRKRENEK TAP RDSOUTHW
O
ODDR APPOMATTOXDRBR
OT
HERS
BL
RIO
GRANDEBL FROSTD R
AIRLINED RARNO LDRDSEBESTA RDNORTH FOREST PWLANGFO
R
D
S
T
NAVARRODRGUADALUPEDR
BALCONES DRFO
X
F
I
R
E
D
R
TODDTRSAND STONE D R
MEDICALAVBIRMINGHAMRDVALLEYVIEWDRBRENTWO O D D REDEACONDRCORSAIRDREMERALD P WTEX
A
S
A
V
S
S
H
6
S
DART
MOUTHST
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
S
T
E
ARL
RUDDERFWSROCKPRAIRIERDHARVEYMITCHELLPWSEXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 6¹
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
CoCS Greenways
CoCS Parks
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
6 Lane Major Arterial
4 Lane Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Freeway/Expressway Major Collector
Minor Collector
Grade Separation
Thoroughfare MapThoroughfare Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 16 of 100
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
C O L L EGEC O L L EGES T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
29
28
21 22
G
E
ROCK PRAIRIE RD WN D
O
W
L
I
N
G
R
D CAIN RDNAVARRODRQUAILRUNSDOWLINGRDCAIN
RD DEACONDRH
OP
E
S
CREEKRDTO
W
E
R
S
P
W
NGRAHAMRDGE
N
E
R
A
L
P
W
WA
L
N
U
T
R
D DEACONDRWI &
GN
RDGREATOAKSDR
H
U
N
T
E
R'S
C
R
E
E
KR
DBLUE RIDGE DRFM
2
1
5
4
Page 5 of 9
See Page 3
See Page 6C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
C O L L EGEC O L L EGES T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
29
28
21 22
G
E
R O CKPRAIRIERDWN D
O
W
L
I
N
G
R
D HOL
L
EMAN
D
R
S CAIN RDQUAILRUNSDOWLINGRD
POTTERLNCAIN
RD NAVARRODRH
OP
E
S
CREEKRDTO
W
E
R
S
P
W
NGRAHAMRDGE
N
E
R
A
L
P
W
WA
L
N
U
T
R
D DEACONDRWI &
GN
RDGR
E
AT
OAKSDRTIMBERLINEDRH
U
N
T
E
R'S
C
R
E
E
KR
DBLUE RIDGE DRDEACONDRFM
2
1
5
4
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
¹
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
CoCS Greenways
CoCS Parks
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
6 Lane Major Arterial
4 Lane Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Freeway/Expressway Major Collector
Minor Collector
Grade Separation
Thoroughfare MapThoroughfare Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 17 of 100
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
32
30
F
31
33
G
G
CAPSTONE DR GRAHAM RDEDELW
EISSAV
BARRONCUT-OFFRDARNO LDRDEAGLEAVMORTIER DRWSPHILLIPS
P
W
CASTLEGAT EDRBIRMINGHAMRDL
O
NGMIRE
DR
VICTORIAAVDEACON DRNE
W
P
O
R
T
L
N
ALE
X
A
N
D
R
I
A
A
V
GE
N
E
R
A
L
P
W
N GRAHAM RDI &
GN
RD
F
M2
1
5
4
WILLIAMDFITCHPW BARRONRDROCK PRAIRIE RDS
H
6
S
Page 6 of 9
See Page 4
See Page 5See Page 7C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
32
30
F
31
33
G
G
CAPSTONE DR GRAHAM RDEDELW
EISSAV
BARRONCUT-OFFRDARNO LDRDEAGLEAVWSPHILLIPSPW
CASTLEGAT EDRBIRMINGHAMRDMORTIER DRLO
N
G
M
I
R
E
D
R
NE
W
P
O
R
T
L
N
GE
N
E
R
A
L
P
W
N GRAHAM RDI &
GN
RD
VIC
T
O
R
I
A
A
VDEACON DRALEXANDRIAAV
F
M2
1
54
WILLIAMDFITCHPW BARRONRDROCK PRAIRIE RDS
H
6
S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 8¹
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
CoCS Greenways
CoCS Parks
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
6 Lane Major Arterial
4 Lane Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Freeway/Expressway Major Collector
Minor Collector
Grade Separation
Thoroughfare MapThoroughfare Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 18 of 100
35
34EAGLEAV
DE
C
A
T
U
R
D
R
C ASTLE RO
C
K
PWC A STLEGATEDRS OAKS DR
ST
ANDREWSDRHUNTER
CREE
KDRSPEARMAN D R
ALE
X
A
N
D
R
I
A
A
V
P EBBLECREEKPW
PARKVIEW DRLAKEWAY
D
R
ARRINGTON RDWILLIAMDFITCHPWBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDROCK PR
A
I
R
I
E
R
D
SH
6
S
Page 7 of 9See Page 635
34EAGLEAV
DE
C
A
T
U
R
D
R
C ASTLERO
C
K
PWCASTLEGATEDR
S OAKS DR
ST
A
N
DREWSDRHUNTERCREEKD
R
SPEARMAN D R
ALE
X
A
N
D
R
I
A
A
V PARKVIEW DRARRINGTONRDLAKEWAYDR
P EBBLECREEKPW
WILLIAMDFITCHPWBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDROCK PR
A
I
R
I
E
R
D
SH
6
S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 9¹
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
CoCS Greenways
CoCS Parks
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
6 Lane Major Arterial
4 Lane Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Freeway/Expressway Major Collector
Minor Collector
Grade Separation
Thoroughfare MapThoroughfare Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 19 of 100
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
32
36
39
33
38
37
40
S DOWLINGRD
LIVE OAK STWS
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
W
CASTLEGAT EDRBARRONCUT-OFFRDC
REEKMEA
D
OW BLNETO
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
I&
G
N
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
WO
O
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
KOPPE BRIDGE RDDY
M
P
L
E
L
N FRIERSONRDCAPSTONE DR
FM 2154GREENS PRAIRIE RDPage 8 of 9
See Page 6
See Page 9C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
32
36
39
33
38
37
40GREENSPRAIRIERDLIVE OAK ST
WS
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
W
CASTLEGAT EDRBARRONCUT-OFFRDSD O W LIN G R D
ETO
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
I&
G
N
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
WO
O
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
KOPPE BRIDGE RDDY
M
P
L
E
L
N FRIERSONRDCREEK
MEADOWBLN
CAPSTONE DR
FM 2154
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
¹
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
CoCS Greenways
CoCS Parks
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
6 Lane Major Arterial
4 Lane Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Freeway/Expressway Major Collector
Minor Collector
Grade Separation
Thoroughfare MapThoroughfare Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 20 of 100
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
41
42
43
44
37
37
40
C A STLEGATEDRNANT
UCKE
T
DRDEER PARK DR
I
N
DIANLAKESDRARRINGTON RDH A RP E R 'S FERR Y R D
WOODLAKEDR
CA
L
U
M
E
T
T
RGREENSPRAIRIERD SH
6
S
Page 9 of 9
See Page 7
See Page 8C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
41
42
43
44
37
37
40
C A STLEGATEDRNANT
UCKE
T
DRDEER PARK DR
IN
DIA
N
LAKES
DRARRINGTON RDHARPER'SFERRYRD
WOODLAKEDR
CA
L
U
M
E
T
T
RGREENSPRAIRIERD SH
6
S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
¹
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
CoCS Greenways
CoCS Parks
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
6 Lane Major Arterial
4 Lane Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Freeway/Expressway Major Collector
Minor Collector
Grade Separation
Thoroughfare MapThoroughfare Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 21 of 100
Page 22 of 100
Overview & Map Book Guide
This Map Book identifies proposed changes to the Bicycle Map of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan based on the Comprehensive Plan Update. It anticipates a full
future buildout of College Station within the city limits and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (a 5-mile boundary outside of city limits). Future bicycle facilities may be constructed by the City
through the City’s capital improvement program or through private development as development occurs. The future envisioned on this map may or may not fully occur based on growth
trends, City and private development decisions, and feasibility.
This Map Book includes the following pages as described below:
1) A table of proposed changes numbered based on the grid location in the Map Book. All proposed changes have been assigned a number and have a corresponding description.
• Two types of changes that have been identified:
a) Proposed Amendments are proposed revisions to the existing Bicycle Map based on community and stakeholder input, changing conditions, and best practices as
well as changes to thoroughfares which typically have bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
b) Potential Alternatives are possible amendments to thoroughfares and corresponding changes to bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are being further evaluated and
are included to allow for initial feedback.
• The proposed changes have also been grouped into the following categories:
a) Add Bike Route – These changes are based on new street connections that provide alternate routes in the throughfare network and would require signage to
communicate that the street is shared by both bicyclists and motor vehicles.
b) Add Bike Facility - These changes are based on new street connections that provide alternate routes in the throughfare network and would include either bike lanes,
buffered bike lanes, or separated bike lanes. The type of facility that will be used will depend on many factors including existing right-of-way, traffic volumes, traffic
speeds, and existing constraints in older areas of town.
c) Remove - Removal of proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities are based on changes to the thoroughfares that are proposed to be removed from the plan.
d) Realign – These changes involve a modification to the planned alignment of a future thoroughfare to better address design constraints or thoroughfare alignments
that alter proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
e) Upgrade – These are existing or proposed bike routes that are being reclassified to a proposed bicycle facility.
2) A legend that describes the different types of bicycle facilities.
3) Two Citywide maps including the existing Bicycle Map and the proposed Bicycle Map. These maps have a grid with related page numbers to review these areas in more detail on
the pages that follow.
4) Detailed grid pages with a side-by-side comparison of the existing Bicycle Map and the proposed Bicycle Map.
Comments & Questions:
Venessa Garza
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Planning Administrator
Phone: 979-764-3570
Email: vgarza@cstx.gov
Page 23 of 100
LEGEND
Bicycle facilities are defined below and are categorized as existing, funded, and proposed.
EXISTING
PROPOSED Bike Route
A street designated with signage that is shared by both bicyclists and motor vehicles. Typically, the
street will have lower traffic speeds and volumes. It may also be a heavily traveled street but is the
only route available.
EXISTING
FUNDED
PROPOSED
Bike Lane
(Bicycle Facility)
A designated part of the street, typically 5-7 feet in width, that is striped, signed and has pavement
markings to be used exclusively by bicyclists. Parking is not allowed in a bike lane.
EXISTING
FUNDED
PROPOSED
Buffered Bike Lane
(Bicycle Facility)
Bike lanes that have a painted buffer space, typically 2-3 feet, to increase horizontal separation
between bicyclists and motor vehicles.
EXISTING
FUNDED
PROPOSED
Separated Bike Lane
(Bicycle Facility)
A designated part of the street, that is physically separated from motor vehicle traffic with a
vertical element or located behind the curb adjacent to the sidewalk.
EXISTING
FUNDED
PROPOSED
Shared-use Path
A wider sidewalk, typically 10-12 feet, that is shared by bicyclists and pedestrians. It is physically
separated from motor vehicles and is located adjacent to a street corridor or within a greenway or
park. Shared-use paths are constructed to be accessible, have an all-weather surface and are also
referred to as greenway trails.
Grade Separation
The vertical separation of two intersecting streets so that traffic flow does not cross each other,
typically achieved through an overpass or underpass with a bicycle and pedestrian facility.
Sometimes they are exclusively for bicyclists and pedestrians.
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
Page 24 of 100
Proposed Amendments
Number Street Name From To Current Plan Proposed Plan Rationale
1 Maple Ave First St Wellborn Rd No Bicycle Facility Add Bike Route Add existing street to Thoroughfare Map as the street extension was proposed in Northgate Operations Plan and add a bike route. Provides opportunity to
create direct route between College Main and Wellborn Rd.
2 Maple Ave extension Cherry St First St No Bicycle Facility Add Bike Route Create new street on Thoroughfare Map and add a bike route as street extension was proposed in Northgate Operations Plan. Provides opportunity to create
direct route between College Main and Wellborn Rd.
3 Scarlett Ohara Dr University Oaks
Blvd Harvey Rd Add Bike Route Upgrade to Bicycle
Facility Add existing street to Thoroughfare Map and upgrade to bicycle facility.
4 Normand Dr Ponderosa Dr Rock Prairie Rd No Bicycle Facility Add Bike Route Add existing street to Thoroughfare Map and add bicycle facility.
5 Towers Pkwy
extension Holleman Dr S Cain Rd No Bicycle Facility Add Bicycle Facility Create new street on Thoroughfare Map by extending Towers Pkwy to intersect Holleman Dr S at Kenyon Dr and add a bicycle facility. This would replace
Cain Rd as thoroughfare connection to Holleman Dr S.
6 Cain Rd Towers Pkwy Holleman Dr S Add Bicycle Facility Remove Bicycle
Facility Remove from Thoroughfare Map as being replaced by Towers Pkwy extension to Holleman Dr S and remove bicycle facility.
7 Bridle Gate Dr Longmire Dr State Highway 6 No Bicycle Facility Add Bike Route Add existing street to Thoroughfare Map and add bicycle route.
8 Brandenburg Lane Eagle Ave Graham Rd No Bicycle Facility Add Bike Route Add existing street to Thoroughfare Map and add bicycle route.
9 Corporate Pkwy
2000 ft northwest
of William D. Fitch
Pkwy
William D. Fitch
Pkwy Add Bicycle Facility Realign Bicycle
Facility
Realign thoroughfare and bicycle facility to Spearman Dr extension at William D Fitch Pkwy as preliminary engineering report determined aligning to Pebble
Creek Pkwy is not feasible to meet US Army Corps of Engineers requirements.
10 Old Royder Rd Royder Rd Victoria Ave No Bicycle Facility Add Bike Route Add existing street to Thoroughfare Map to create a connection connection between Victoria Ave and Royder Rd and add a bike route.
11 Future Collector Future Collector Royder Rd Add Bicycle Facility Remove Bicycle
Facility Remove from Thoroughfare Map as collector due to limited connectivity in an area designated as Rural outside the City limits and remove bicycle facility.
12 Future Collector 2,500 ft southeast
of Royder Rd Royder Rd Add Bicycle Facility Realign Bicycle
Facility Realign on Thoroughfare Map to the north to remove current offset at Royder Rd with future collector to the east and realign bicycle facility.
13 Riva Ridge Rd Calumet Trail Woodlake Dr No Bicycle Facility Add Bike Route Add existing street to Thoroughfare Map to relocate future collector that was planned across developed residential lots to an existing street and add a bike
route.
14 Oldham Oaks Ave
extension Riva Ridge Rd Woodlake Dr Add Bicycle Facility Remove Bicycle
Facility Remove future collector extension from Thoroughfare Map across developed lots and relocate connection to existing Riva Ridge Rd and add a bicycle facility.
Number Street Name From To Current Plan Proposed Plan Rationale
A Ash St extension Texas Ave Eisenhower St No Bicycle Facility Add Bicycle Facility Potential alternative on Thoroughfare Map to create new street connection between Texas Ave and Eisenhower Dr and add a bicycle facility. Area designated
as Urban Center on Future Land Use & Character Map and connection could occur if properties redevelop in the future.
B Nimitz St Lincoln Ave University Dr East No Bicycle Facility Add Bicycle Facility Potential alternative on Thoroughfare Map to add existing street and add a bicycle facility. A traffic signal is being installed on University Drive at Nimitz St
and will likely increase usage of the street. The change could be coupled with potential downgrade to Eisenhower St.
C Post Oak Mall
Collector Holleman Dr East Harvey Rd No Bicycle Facility Add Bicycle Facility Potential alternative on Thoroughfare Map to create new street connection between Harvey Rd and Holleman Dr E and add a bicycle facility. Area is
designated as Urban Center on Future Land Use and Character Map and connection could occur if property redevelops in some form in the future.
D Luther St West
extension North Dowling Rd Harvey Mitchell
Pkwy S Add Bicycle Facility Remove Potential alternative on Thoroughfare Map to remove minor arterial extension and remove bicycle facility. TxDOT widening of Harvey Mitchell Pkwy includes
overpass at Jones Butler Rd which allows connection to Holleman Dr S. Jones Butler Rd corridor may provide sufficient alternate route.
E General Pkwy
extension
William D. Fitch
Pkwy extension North Graham Rd Add Bicycle Facility Remove Potential alternative on Thoroughfare Map to remove minor collector connection to William D Fitch Pkwy extension and remove the bicycle facility if the
William D Fitch Pkwy extension is removed from plan.
F William D. Fitch Pkwy
extension Wellborn Rd Rock Prairie Rd West Add Bicycle Facility Remove Potential alternative to remove connection to Wellborn Rd at William D Fitch Pkwy and bicycle facility. Feasibility over future grade separation is being
evaluated and may result is other changes to accommodate removal.
Potential Alternatives
Table of Proposed Bicycle Changes
Page 25 of 100
!
!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!
!
!
!!!!
!!!!!!
TEX
A
S
A
V
S
TEX
A
S
A
V
UNIVERSITY DRVICTORIAAV
SH 6
SWILLIAMDFITCHPWUNIVERSITYDRESOUTHWEST P
WGEORGEBUSHDR HARVEYRDHO
L
L
EM
A
N
D
R
S
HOPESCR
E
E
KR
DPEACHCREEKRDROCKPRAIRIERD
HARVEY MITCHELL PW S
11 22
33 44
55 66 77
88 99
¹
0 105Miles
Bicycle MapBicycle Map
* Bike facilities could be bike lanes, buffered bike lanesor separated bike lanes.
! ! !
Bike Lane ExistingBike Facilities FundedBike Facilities Proposed *Bike Route ExistingBike Route Proposed
ParksCSISD Property
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!! !
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed
Potential Alternatives
Proposed Amendments
Existing Bicycle MapExisting Bicycle Map
Page 26 of 100
!
!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!
!
!
!!!!
!!!!!!
TEX
A
S
A
V
S
TEX
A
S
A
V
UNIVERSITY DRVICTORIAAV
SH 6
SWILLIAMDFITCHPWUNIVERSITYDRESOUTHWEST P
WGEORGEBUSHDR HARVEYRDHO
L
L
EM
A
N
D
R
S
HOPESCR
E
E
KR
DPEACHCREEKRDROCKPRAIRIERD
HARVEY MITCHELL PW S
11 22
33 44
55 66 77
88 99
¹
0 105Miles
Bicycle MapBicycle Map
* Bike facilities could be bike lanes, buffered bike lanesor separated bike lanes.
! ! !
Bike Lane ExistingBike Facilities FundedBike Facilities Proposed *Bike Route ExistingBike Route Proposed
ParksCSISD Property
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!! !
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed
Potential Alternatives
Proposed Amendments
Proposed Bicycle MapProposed Bicycle Map
Page 27 of 100
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
C I T Y OFC I T Y OFB R Y ANB R Y AN
1 2
A
B
WALTON DR
ANDERSONSTBROADMOORDRSPRINGLOE NORTH AVMUNSONAV
CARTERCREEKPW
TANGLEW
O
O
D
D
R
DOMINIK DRBRIAR O
A
K
S
D
R
TIMBERSTNROSEMARYDR FRANCIS DRNEW MAIN DRC
O
K
E
S
TLUBBOCK STLEWIS STBIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
T
FOSTERAV
OL
S
E
N
B
LCROSS STJOE ROUTT BLNA
G
L
E
S
T
INLOWBLCHERRYSTSP
E
N
C
E
S
TCHURCH AVUNIVERSITY OAKS BLGILCHRIST A V
PARKPLA CEHENSEL DRGEORGE BUSH DRTEX
A
S
A
VUNIVERSITY DRLINCOLN AVHOLLEMAN D R
S TE
X
A
S
A
V
TEX
A
S
A
V
S HARVEY RDTAR
R
O
W
S
T
E
2
9
TH
S
T
C
A
V
I
T
T
A
V
RAYMONDSTOTZERPWEA
RL
RU
D
DERFW
S
UNIVERSITY
D
R E
SC
OLLEGE
A
V
HOLLEMAN DR EEVILLAMARIARDPage 1 of 9 See Page 2!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
C I T Y OFC I T Y OFB R Y ANB R Y AN
1 2
A
B
WALTON D R
ANDERSONSTBROADMOORDRE NORTH AVTANGLEW
O
O
D
D
R
DOMINIK DRBRIAR O
A
K
S
D
R
FRANCIS DRNROSEMARYDRTIMBERST
S P R IN G L O
MUNSON
AV
CARTERCREEKPW
GEORGEBUSH
D
RE
C
O
K
E
S
TLUBBOCK STLEWIS STFOSTERAVCROSS STJOE ROUTT BLCHERRYSTSP
E
N
C
E
S
TCHURCH AVUNIVERSITY OAKS BLGILCHR IS T A V
PARKP LAC ENEW MAIN DROL
S
E
N
B
L
BIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
T
NA
G
L
E
S
T
INLOWBLHENSEL DRGEORGE BUSH DRUNIVERSITY DRTEX
A
S
A
VLINCOLN AVHOLLEMAN D R
S TE
X
A
S
A
V
TEX
A
S
A
V
S HARVEY RDTAR
R
O
W
S
T
E
2
9
TH
S
T
C
A
V
I
T
T
A
V
RAYMONDSTOTZERPWEA
RL
RU
D
DER
FW
S
UNIVERSITY
D
R
E
SC
OLLEGE
A
V
HOLLEMAN DR EEVILLAMARIARDEXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 3¹
* Bike facilities could bebike lanes, buffered bike lanesor separated bike lanes.
! ! !
Bike Lane ExistingBike Facilities FundedBike Facilities Proposed *Bike Route ExistingBike Route Proposed
Shared-use Path Existing
! ! !Shared-use Path FundedShared-use Path ProposedGrade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded!!!
Grade Separation Proposed
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
Bicycle MapBicycle Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives Page 28 of 100
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
V e t e ransV e t e ransP a rkP a rk
3
CDOMINIK DRFRANCISD RMUNSONAV
KRENEK TAP RDCOLGATEDRNORTH FOREST PWRAI
N
T
R
E
E
D
RUNIVERSITYOAKSBL
BRENTWO O D D RELIN
D
A
L
N
E
A
R
L
R
U
D
D
E
R
F
W
SUNIVERSITY DR EHOLLEMAN DR EHARVEY RDDART
MOU
T
H
S
T
TEX
A
S
A
V
S
Page 2 of 9See Page 1C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
V e t e ransV e t e ransP a rkP a rk
3
CDOMINIK DRFRANCISDRCOLGATEDRMU
N
S
O
N
A
V
KRENEK TAP RDNORTH FOREST PWRAI
N
T
R
E
E
D
RUNIVERSITYOAKSBL
BRENTWO O D D RELIN
D
A
L
N
E
A
R
L
R
U
D
D
E
R
F
W
SUNIVERSITY DR EHOLLEMAN DR EHARVEY RDDART
MOU
T
H
S
T
TEX
A
S
A
V
S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 4¹
* Bike facilities could bebike lanes, buffered bike lanesor separated bike lanes.
! ! !
Bike Lane ExistingBike Facilities FundedBike Facilities Proposed *Bike Route ExistingBike Route Proposed
Shared-use Path Existing
! ! !Shared-use Path FundedShared-use Path ProposedGrade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded!!!
Grade Separation Proposed
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
Bicycle MapBicycle Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives Page 29 of 100
!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!D
ANDERSONST
DEXTERDR
GLADESTDE
X
TERDRS
NU
E
C
ESDR
FAI
R
V
I
E
W
A
VMAR
ION
PUG
H
D
R
LUTHER ST WTIMBERST
N DOWLING RDPENBERTHY
BL
LANGFORDST
MO
N
T
C
L
A
I
R
A
V
CAIN RDQUAILRUNNAVARRO DRHAINES DR
WEL
S
H
A
V
RE
S
E
A
R
CHPWBALCONESDRJOHNKIMBROUGHBLC
O
K
E
S
T
OL
S
E
N
B
L LEWIS STJOE ROUTT BLBIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
T
OLDMAIND R PARKPLA CE
DEACONDRH
OLLEMA N D R SGEORGE BUSHDRW
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
D HOLLEMAN DRGEORGE BUSH DR WTEXASAVS
HOLLEMANDR
WRAYMONDSTOTZERPW
FM
2
1
5
4
HAR
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
P
W
S
Page 3 of 9
See Page 1
See Page 4!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!D
ANDERSONSTDEXTERDR
DEXTER
DRS
NU
E
C
ESDR
LUTHER ST WN DOWLINGRDTIMBERST
MAR
ION
PUG
H
D
R
FAI
R
V
I
E
W
A
V
PENBERTHY
BL
LANGFORDST
CAIN RDQUAILRUNHAINES DR
RE
S
E
A
R
CHPWBALCONESDRMO
N
T
C
L
A
I
R
A
V
NAVARRO DRWE
L
S
H
A
VJOHNKIMBROUGHBLLEWIS STJOE ROUTT BLOLDMAIND R
PARK PLACEC
O
K
E
S
T
OL
S
E
N
B
L
BIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
T
DEACONDRH
OLLEMA N D R SGEORGE BUSHDRW
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
D HOLLEMANDRGEORGE BUSH DR WTEXASAVS
HOLLEMANDR
WRAYMONDSTOTZERPW
FM
2
1
5
4
HARVEY MITC H ELL PW S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 5¹
* Bike facilities could bebike lanes, buffered bike lanesor separated bike lanes.
! ! !
Bike Lane ExistingBike Facilities FundedBike Facilities Proposed *Bike Route ExistingBike Route Proposed
Shared-use Path Existing
! ! !Shared-use Path FundedShared-use Path ProposedGrade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded!!!
Grade Separation Proposed
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
Bicycle MapBicycle Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives Page 30 of 100
4
7GRAHAM RDSOUTHW
O
ODDR
PO N D ERO SADRW O O D C R E E K DRBROTHERSBLRIO
G
R
A
N
D
E
B
L
E M ER A LD PWKRENEK TAP RDLO
N
GMIRE
DR FROSTD R
AIRLINEDRARNO LDRDSEBESTA RDNORTH FOREST PWVALLEYVIEWDRLANGFO
R
D
S
T
NAVARRODRGUADALUPEDR
BALCONESDRFO
X
F
I
R
E
D
R
TO D D TR
SAND S TONE D R
MEDICALAVBIRMINGHAM RDAPPOMATTOXDRBRENTWO O D D REDEACONDRCORSAIRDRTEX
A
S
A
V
S
S
H
6
S
DART
MOUTHST
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
S
T
E
ARL
RUDDERFWSROCKPRAIRIERDHARVEYMITCHELLPWSPage 4 of 9
See Page 2
See Page 34
7GRAHAM RDPO N D ERO SADRW O O D C R E E K DRKRENEK TAP RDLO
NGMIRE
DR
SOUTHW
O
ODDR APPOMATTOXDRBR
OT
HERS
BL
RIO
GRANDEBL FROSTD R
AIRLINED R
ARNO LDRDSEBESTA RDNORTH FOREST PWLANGFO
R
D
S
T
NAVARRODRGUADALUPEDR
BALCONES DRFO
X
F
I
R
E
D
R
TO D D TR
SAND STONE D R
MEDICALAVBIRMINGHAMRDVALLEYVIEWDRBRENTWO O D D REDEACONDRCORSAIRDREMERALD P WTEX
A
S
A
V
S
S
H
6
S
DART
MOUTHST
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
S
T
E
ARL
RUDDERFWSROCKPRAIRIERDHARVEYMITCHELLPWSEXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 6¹
* Bike facilities could bebike lanes, buffered bike lanesor separated bike lanes.
! ! !
Bike Lane ExistingBike Facilities FundedBike Facilities Proposed *Bike Route ExistingBike Route Proposed
Shared-use Path Existing
! ! !Shared-use Path FundedShared-use Path ProposedGrade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded!!!
Grade Separation Proposed
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
Bicycle MapBicycle Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives Page 31 of 100
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
C O L L EGEC O L L EGES T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
6
5
F
D
ROCK PRAIRIE RD WHOL
L
EMAN
D
R
S
N D
O
W
L
I
N
G
R
D CAIN RDNAVARRODRQUAILRUNSDOWLINGRDCAIN
RD DEACONDRH
OP
E
S
CREEKRDTO
W
E
R
S
P
W
NGRAHAMRDGE
N
E
R
A
L
P
W
WA
L
N
U
T
R
D DEACONDRWI &
GN
RDGREATOAKSDR
H
U
N
T
E
R'S
C
R
E
E
KR
DBLUE RIDGE DRFM
2
1
5
4
Page 5 of 9
See Page 3
See Page 6!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
C O L L EGEC O L L EGES T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
6
5
F
D
R O CKPRAIRIERDWN D
O
W
L
I
N
G
R
D HOL
L
EMAN
D
R
S CAIN RDQUAILRUNSDOWLINGRD
POTTERLNCAIN
RD NAVARRODRH
OP
E
S
CREEKRDTO
W
E
R
S
P
W
NGRAHAMRDGE
N
E
R
A
L
P
W
WA
L
N
U
T
R
D DEACONDRWI &
GN
RDGR
E
AT
OAKSDRTIMBERLINEDRH
U
N
T
E
R'S
C
R
E
E
KR
DBLUE RIDGE DRDEACONDRFM
2
1
5
4
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
¹
* Bike facilities could bebike lanes, buffered bike lanesor separated bike lanes.
! ! !
Bike Lane ExistingBike Facilities FundedBike Facilities Proposed *Bike Route ExistingBike Route Proposed
Shared-use Path Existing
! ! !Shared-use Path FundedShared-use Path ProposedGrade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded!!!
Grade Separation Proposed
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
Bicycle MapBicycle Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives Page 32 of 100
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
7
E
8
F
F
CAPSTONE DR GRAHAM RDEDELW
EISSAV
BARRONCUT-OFFRDARNO LDRDEAGLEAVMORTIER DRWSPHILLIPS
P
W
CASTLEGAT EDRBIRMINGHAMRDLO
N
GMIRE
DR
VICTORIAAVDEACON DRNE
W
P
O
R
T
L
N
ALE
X
A
N
D
R
I
A
A
V
GE
N
E
R
A
L
P
W
N GRAHAM RDI &
GN
RD
F
M2
1
5
4
WILLIAMDFITCHPW BARRONRDROCK PRAIRIE RDS
H
6
S
Page 6 of 9
See Page 4
See Page 5See Page 7!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
7
E
8
F
F
CAPSTONE DR GRAHAM RDEDELW
EISSAV
BARRONCUT-OFFRDARNO LDRDEAGLEAVWSPHILLIPSPW
CASTLEGAT EDRBIRMINGHAMRDMORTIER DRLO
N
G
M
I
R
E
D
R
NE
W
P
O
R
T
L
N
GE
N
E
R
A
L
P
W
N GRAHAM RDI &
GN
RD
VIC
T
O
R
I
A
A
VDEACON DRALEXANDRIAAV
F
M2
1
54
WILLIAMDFITCHPW BARRONRDROCK PRAIRIE RDS
H
6
S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 8¹
* Bike facilities could bebike lanes, buffered bike lanesor separated bike lanes.
! ! !
Bike Lane ExistingBike Facilities FundedBike Facilities Proposed *Bike Route ExistingBike Route Proposed
Shared-use Path Existing
! ! !Shared-use Path FundedShared-use Path ProposedGrade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded!!!
Grade Separation Proposed
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
Bicycle MapBicycle Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives Page 33 of 100
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
9EAGLEAV
DE
C
A
T
U
R
D
R
C ASTLE RO
C
K
PWC A STLEGATEDRS OAKS DR
ST
ANDREWSDRHUNTER
CREE
KDRSPEARMAN D R
ALE
X
A
N
D
R
I
A
A
V
P EBBLECREEKPW
PARKVIEW DRLAKEWAY
D
R
ARRINGTON RDWILLIAMDFITCHPWBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDROCK PR
A
I
R
I
E
R
D
SH
6
S
Page 7 of 9See Page 6!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
9EAGLEAV
DE
C
A
T
U
R
D
R
C ASTLERO
C
K
PWCASTLEGATEDR
S OAKS DR
ST
A
N
DREWSDRHUNTERCREEKD
R
SPEARMAN D R
ALE
X
A
N
D
R
I
A
A
V PARKVIEW DRARRINGTONRDLAKEWAYDR
P EBBLECREEKPW
WILLIAMDFITCHPWBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDROCK PR
A
I
R
I
E
R
D
SH
6
S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 9¹
* Bike facilities could bebike lanes, buffered bike lanesor separated bike lanes.
! ! !
Bike Lane ExistingBike Facilities FundedBike Facilities Proposed *Bike Route ExistingBike Route Proposed
Shared-use Path Existing
! ! !Shared-use Path FundedShared-use Path ProposedGrade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded!!!
Grade Separation Proposed
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
Bicycle MapBicycle Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives Page 34 of 100
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
10
12
11 11
S DOWLINGRD
LIVE OAK ST
WS
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
W
CASTLEGAT EDRBARRONCUT-OFFRDC
REEKMEA
D
OW BLNETO
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
I&
G
N
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
WO
O
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
KOPPE BRIDGE RDDY
M
P
L
E
L
N FRIERSONRDCAPSTONE DR
FM 2154GREENS PRAIRIE RDPage 8 of 9
See Page 6
See Page 9!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
10
12
11 11GREENSPRAIRIERDLIVE OAK ST
WS
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
W
CASTLEGAT EDRBARRONCUT-OFFRDSD O W LIN G R D
ETO
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
I&
G
N
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
WO
O
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
KOPPE BRIDGE RDDY
M
P
L
E
L
N FRIERSONRDCREEK
MEADOWBLN
CAPSTONE DR
FM 2154
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
¹
* Bike facilities could bebike lanes, buffered bike lanesor separated bike lanes.
! ! !
Bike Lane ExistingBike Facilities FundedBike Facilities Proposed *Bike Route ExistingBike Route Proposed
Shared-use Path Existing
! ! !Shared-use Path FundedShared-use Path ProposedGrade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded!!!
Grade Separation Proposed
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
Bicycle MapBicycle Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives Page 35 of 100
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
13
14
11
C A STLEGATEDRNANT
UCKE
T
DRDEER PARK DR
I
N
DIANLAKESDRARRINGTON RDH A RP E R 'S FERR Y R D
WOODLAKEDR
CA
L
U
M
E
T
T
RGREENSPRAIRIERD SH
6
S
Page 9 of 9
See Page 7
See Page 8!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
13
14
11
C A STLEGATEDRNANT
UCKE
T
DRDEER PARK DR
IN
DIA
N
LAKES
DRARRINGTON RDHARPER'SFERRYRD
WOODLAKEDR
CA
L
U
M
E
T
T
RGREENSPRAIRIERD SH
6
S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
¹
* Bike facilities could bebike lanes, buffered bike lanesor separated bike lanes.
! ! !
Bike Lane ExistingBike Facilities FundedBike Facilities Proposed *Bike Route ExistingBike Route Proposed
Shared-use Path Existing
! ! !Shared-use Path FundedShared-use Path ProposedGrade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded!!!
Grade Separation Proposed
Schools/CSISD Propertynm
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
0 0.50.25 Miles
Bicycle MapBicycle Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives Page 36 of 100
Page 37 of 100
Overview & Map Book Guide
This Map Book identifies proposed changes to the Pedestrian Map of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan based on the Comprehensive Plan Update. It anticipates a full
future buildout of College Station within the city limits and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (a 5-mile boundary outside of city limits). Future pedestrian facilities may be constructed by the
City through the City’s capital improvement program or through private development as development occurs. The future envisioned on this map may or may not fully occur based on
growth trends, City and private development decisions, and feasibility.
This Map Book includes the following pages as described below:
1)A table of proposed changes numbered based on the grid location in the Map Book. All proposed changes have been assigned a number that’s labeled and have a corresponding
description.
•Two types of changes that have been identified:
a)Proposed Amendments are proposed revisions to the existing Pedestrian Map based on community and stakeholder input, changing conditions, and best practices
as well as changes to thoroughfares which typically have bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
b)Potential Alternatives are possible amendments to thoroughfares and corresponding changes to bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are being further evaluated and
are included to allow for initial feedback.
•The proposed changes have also been grouped into the following categories:
a)Add Sidewalk - These changes are based on new street connections that provide alternate routes in the thoroughfare network and would include the addition of a
sidewalk. Sidewalks are also proposed in redevelopment areas identified in the Future Land Use & Character Map and would be added when and if these areas
redevelop.
b)Remove - Removal of proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities are based on changes to the thoroughfares that are proposed to be removed from the plan.
c)Realign – These changes involve a modification to the planned alignment of a future thoroughfare to better address design constraints or thoroughfare alignments
that alter proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
2)A legend that describes the different types of pedestrian facilities.
3)Two Citywide map including the existing Pedestrian Map and the proposed Pedestrian Map. These maps have a grid with related page numbers to review these areas in more
detail on the pages that follow.
4)Detailed grid pages with a side-by-side comparison of the existing Pedestrian Map and the proposed Pedestrian Map.
Comments & Questions:
Venessa Garza
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Planning Administrator
Phone: 979-764-3570
Email: vgarza@cstx.gov
Page 38 of 100
Legend
Pedestrian facilities are defined below and are categorized as existing, funded, and proposed.
Proposed Sidewalks are illustrated with one line if the sidewalk is proposed on one side of a street and with two lines if proposed on both sides. The intent is to have sidewalks on both
sides of all thoroughfares (as identified in the Thoroughfare Map), if feasible, but are not always illustrated on the map. For sidewalks proposed on one side, the side of the street for
sidewalk placement will not be determined until funding is identified and the corridor is evaluated further.
EXISTING
FUNDED
PROPOSED
Sidewalk A paved walkway alongside a road for pedestrians.
EXISTING
FUNDED
PROPOSED
Shared-use Path
A wider sidewalk, typically 10-12 feet, that is shared by bicyclists and pedestrians. It is physically
separated from motor vehicles and is located adjacent to a street corridor or within a greenway or
park. Shared-use paths are constructed to be accessible, have an all-weather surface and are also
referred to as greenway trails.
Grade Separation
The vertical separation of two intersecting streets so that traffic flow does not cross each other,
typically achieved through an overpass or underpass with a bicycle and pedestrian facility.
Sometimes they are exclusively for bicyclists and pedestrians.
! ! !
! ! ! !
Page 39 of 100
Proposed Amendments
Number Street Name From To Current Plan Proposed Plan Rationale
1 Maple Ave extension First St Cherry St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Create new street on the Thoroughfare Map and add a sidewalk as the street extension was proposed in Northgate Operations Plan.
Provides opportunity to create direct route between College Main and Wellborn Rd.
2 Jane St 135 Ft Se Of Cooner St Cooner St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
3 Eisenhower Street 180 Ft Se Of Cooner St Cooner St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
4 Eisenhower Street 400 Ft Se Of Cooner St Cooner St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
5 Nimitz St 415 Ft Se Of Cooner St Cooner St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
6 Nimitz St University Drive E Cooner St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
7 Macarthur St University Dr E Cooner St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
8 Jane St University Drive E 375 Ft Nw Of University Drive
E No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
9 Poplar St Texas Ave Eisenhower St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
10 Poplar St Texas Ave 165 Ft Ne Of Texas Ave No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
11 Poplar St Eisenhower St 445 Ft Sw Of Eisenhower St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
12 Eisenhower St University Dr E 225 Ft Se Of University Dr E No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
13 Eisenhower St University Dr E Ash St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
14 Nimitz St University Dr E Ash St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
15 Poplar St Eisenhower St Turner St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
16 Poplar St Eisenhower St Turner St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
17 Live Oak St Texas Ave Eisenhower St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
18 Live Oak St Eisenhower St Turner St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
19 Turner St Poplar St 145 Ft Se Of Ash St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
20 Ash St Eisenhower St Turner St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
21 Eisenhower St 775 Ft Nw Of Lincoln Ave Lincoln Ave No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
22 Avenue A Lincoln Ave 500 Ft Nw Of Lincoln Ave No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
23 Francis Drive 245 Ft Ne Of Texas Ave Texas Ave No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
24 Gilchrist Ave Foster Ave Puryear Dr No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add connection from City Hall to Thomas Park
25 Moss St Texas Ave Foster Ave No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
26 George Bush Dr E Harvey Rd Dominik Dr No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
27 Scarlett Ohara Drive University Oaks Blvd Harvey Rd No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add existing street to the Thoroughfare Map and add a sidewalk.
28 Grove St Wellborn Rd 135 Ft Ne Of Wellborn Rd No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
29 Highlands St George Bush Dr Luther St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
30 Grove St Highlands St Montclair Ave No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
31 Fidelity St Wellborn Rd Montclair Ave No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
32 Luther St 120 Ft Ne Of Wellborn Rd 145 Ft Ne Of Highlands St No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
33 Luther St Montclair Ave 170 Ft Sw Of Montclair Ave No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add sidewalk in redevelopment area identifed in the Future Land Use & Character Map
34 Towers Pkwy extension Holleman Dr S Cain Rd No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Create new street on the Thoroughfare Map by extending Towers Pkwy to intersect Holleman Dr S at Kenyon Dr and add a sidewalk.
This would replace Cain Rd as thoroughfare connection to Holleman Dr S.
35 Cain Rd Holleman Dr S Old Wellborn Rd Add Sidewalk Remove Sidewalk Remove from Thoroughfare Map as being replaced by Towers Pkwy extension to Holleman Dr S and remove sidewalks.
36 Corporate Pkwy 2000 Ft Nw Of William D Fitch
Pw William D Fitch Pw Add Sidewalk Realign Sidewalk Realign thoroughfare and sidewalk to Spearman Dr extension at William D Fitch Pkwy as preliminary engineering report determined
aligning to Pebble Creek Pkwy is not feasible to meet US Army Corps of Engineers requirements.
37 Gateway Blvd Lakeway Dr Sh 6 No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add existing street to the Thoroughfare Map and add a sidewalk on one side.
Table of Proposed Pedestrian Changes
Page 40 of 100
Proposed Amendments
Number Street Name From To Current Plan Proposed Plan Rationale
38 Old Royder Rd Royder Rd Victoria Ave No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk Add existing street to the Thoroughfare Map to create a connection between Victoria Ave and Royder Rd and add a sidewalk.
39 Future Collector Royder Rd Future Collector Add Sidewalk Remove Sidewalk Remove from the Thoroughfare Map as collector due to limited connectivity in an area designated as Rural outside the City limits
and remove sidewalks.
40 Future Collector Royder Rd.2500 Ft Se Of Royder Rd Add Sidewalk Realign Realign on the Thoroughfare Map to the north to remove current offset at Royder Rd with future collector to the east and realign
sidewalk.
Number Street Name From To Current Plan Proposed Plan Rationale
A Ash Street Eisenhower Street Texas Ave No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk
Potential alternative on the Thoroughfare Map to create new street connection between Texas Ave and Eisenhower Dr. Area
designated as Urban Center on Future Land Use and Character Map and connection could occur if properties redevelop in the
future.
B Post Oak Mall Collector Holleman Drive East Harvey Rd No Sidewalk Add Sidewalk
Potential alternative on the Thoroughfare Map to Create new street connection between Harvey Rd and Holleman Dr E and add a
sidewalk. Area is designated as Urban Center on Future Land Use and Character Map and connection could occur if property
redevelops in some form in the future.
C Luther Street W
extension North Dowling Rd Harvey Mitchell Pkwy South Add Sidewalk Remove Sidewalk
Potential alternative on the Thoroughfare Map to remove minor arterial extension and remove sidewalks. TxDOT widening of
Harvey Mitchell Pkwy includes overpass at Jones Butler Rd which allows connection to Holleman Dr S. Jones Butler Rd corridor may
provide sufficient alternate route.
D General Pkwy extension William D. Fitch Pkwy
extension North Graham Rd Add Sidewalk Remove Sidewalk Potential alternative on the Thoroughfare Map to remove minor collector connection to William D Fitch Pkwy extension and remove
the sidewalks if the William D Fitch Pkwy extension is removed from plan.
E William D. Fitch Pkwy
extension Wellborn Rd Rock Prairie Rd W Add Sidewalk Remove Sidewalk Potential alternative to remove connection to Wellborn Rd at William D Fitch Pkwy and remove sidewalks. Feasibility over future
grade separation is being evaluated and may result is other changes to accommodate removal.
Potential Alternatives
(these potential alternatives to thoroughfares and the corresponding changes to bicycle and pedestrian facilities have not yet been proposed and are being further evaluated and are included to allow for initial feedback)
Page 41 of 100
!!
!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!
!
!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!
!
!!!!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!
!
!!!
!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!
TEX
A
S
A
V
S
TEX
A
S
A
V
UNIVERSITY DRVICTORIAAV
SH 6
SWILLIAMDFITCHPWUNIVERSITYDRESOUTHWEST P
WGEORGEBUSHDR HARVEYRDHO
L
L
EM
AN
D
R
S
HOPESCR
E
E
KR
DPEACHCREEKRDROCKPRAIRIERD
HARVEY MITCHELLPW S
11 22
33 44
55 66 77
88
¹
0 105Miles
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Grade Separation Existing
Multi-use Path ExistingMulti-use Path FundedMulti-use Path Proposed! ! !
! ! !
Sidewalk ExistingSidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Master Plan Update / Change
P e d e s t r i an PlanP e d e s t r i an Plan
CSISD Property
Parks
Existing Pedestrian MapExisting Pedestrian Map
! ! !
Sidewalk ExistingSidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Pedestrian MapPedestrian Map
CSISD Property
Parks
Potential AlternativesProposed Amendments
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed! ! !
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Page 42 of 100
!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!!
!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!
!
!
TEXA
S
A
V
S
TEX
A
S
A
V
UNIVERSITY DRVICTORIAAV
SH 6
SWILLIAMDFITCHPWUNIVERSITYDRESOUTHWEST P
WGEORGEBUSHDR HARVEYRDHO
L
L
EM
A
N
D
R
S
HOPESCR
E
E
KRDPEACHCREEKRDROCKPRAIRIERD
HARVEY MITCHELL PW S
11 22
33 44
55 66 77
88
¹
0 105Miles
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Grade Separation Existing
Multi-use Path ExistingMulti-use Path FundedMulti-use Path Proposed! ! !
! ! !
Sidewalk ExistingSidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Master Plan Update / Change
P e d e s t r i an PlanP e d e s t r i an Plan
CSISD Property
Parks
Proposed Pedestrian MapProposed Pedestrian Map
! ! !
Sidewalk ExistingSidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Pedestrian MapPedestrian Map
CSISD Property
Parks
Potential AlternativesProposed Amendments
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed! ! !
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Page 43 of 100
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
C I T Y OFC I T Y OFB R Y ANB R Y AN
25
1
26
24
23
SEE INSET MAP
WALTON D R
ANDERSONSTBROADMOORDRSPRINGLO
MUNSONAV
CARTERCREEKPW
DOMINIK DRTANG
LEW
O
O
D
D
R
BRIAR O
A
K
S
D
R
TIMBERSTNROSEMARYDR FRANCIS DRC
O
K
E
S
TLUBBOCK STLEWIS STBIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
T
FOSTERAV
OL
S
E
N
B
LCROSS STJOE ROUTT BLNA
G
L
E
S
T
INLOWBLCHERRYSTSP
E
N
C
E
S
T UNIVERSITY OAKS BLCHURCH AVGILCHRIST A V
PARKPLACEHENSEL DRGEORGE BUSH DRTEX
A
S
A
V
UNIVERSITY DRWE
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
D LINCOLN AVHOLLEMAN D REA
RL
RUD
DER
FW
S
TEXASAV
S
S TE
X
A
S
A
V
HOLLEMAN DR EWELLBO
RN
R
D
N HARVEY RDTAR
R
O
W
S
T
E
2
9
TH
S
T
C
A
VITT
AVUNIVERSITY
D
R
E
SCOLLEGE
AVEVILLAMARIARD
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8
Page 1 of 8 See Page 2!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
C I T Y OFC I T Y OFB R Y ANB R Y AN
25
1
26
24
23
SEE INSET MAP
WALTON D R
ANDERSONSTBROADMOORDR DOMINIK DRTANG
LEW
O
O
D
D
R
BRIAR O
A
K
S
D
R
FRANCIS DRNROSEMARYDRTIMBERST
S P R IN G L O
MUNSON
A
V
CARTERCREEKPW
GEORGEBUSH
D
RE
C
O
K
E
S
TLUBBOCK STLEWIS STFOSTERAVCROSS STJOE ROUTT BLNA
G
L
E
S
T
CHERRYSTSP
E
N
C
E
S
T UNIVERSITY OAKS BLCHURCH AVGILCHR IS T A V
PARKP LA C EOL
S
E
N
B
L
BIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
TINLOWBLHENSEL DRGEORGE BUSH DRTEX
A
S
A
V
WE
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
D LINCOLN AVHOLLEMAN D REARL
RU
D
DER
F
W
S
TEXASAV
S
S TE
X
A
S
A
V
HOLLEMAN DR EWELLBO
RN
R
D
N HARVEY RDTAR
R
O
W
S
T
E
2
9
TH
S
T
C
A
VITT
AVUNIVERSITY
D
R
E
SCOLLEGE
AVEVILLAMARIARD
UNIVERSITYDREXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 3¹
0 0.50.25 Miles
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed! ! !
Sidewalk Existing
! ! !Sidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Schools/CSISD Property
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
nmPedestrian MapPedestrian Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 44 of 100
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2
10
3
128
4
5
11
22
6
7
19
1815
20
16
21
17
9
A
14
1413
13
WALTONDRFOS
T
E
R
A
V
EISENHOWERST
UNIVERSITY DRTEX
A
S
A
V
TAR
R
O
W
S
T
LINCOLN AVUNIVERSITY DR EPRESTON STPAS
L
E
R
S
T
CH
A
P
P
E
L
S
T
TUR
N
E
R
S
T
CH
U
R
C
H
I
L
L
S
TBANKS STSROSEMARYDRPOPLAR STNIM
I
T
Z
S
TCOONER STASH STCOLUMBUS STPEARCE STS
H
A
DYLN
AV
E
N
U
E
APEYTON STLIVE OAK STMA
C
A
R
T
H
U
R
S
T
JA
N
E
S
T
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8
INSET MAP
2
10
3
128
4
5
11
22
6
7
19
1815
20
16
21
17
9
A
14
1413
13
15
16
18
WALTONDRFOS
T
E
R
A
VUNIVERSITY DRTEX
A
S
A
V
TAR
R
O
W
S
T
LINCOLN AVUNIVERSITY DR EPRESTON STPAS
L
E
R
S
T
CH
A
P
P
E
L
S
T
TUR
N
E
R
S
T
CH
U
R
C
H
I
L
L
S
TBANKS STSROSEMA R Y DRPOPLAR STNIM
I
T
Z
S
TCOONER STASH STCOLUMBUS STPEARCE STS
H
A
DYLN PEYTON STMA
C
A
R
T
H
U
R
S
T
JA
N
E
S
T
NORTHPOINT LNLIVE OAK STEXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
¹
0 0.10.05 Miles
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed! ! !
Sidewalk Existing
! ! !Sidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Schools/CSISD Property
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
nmPedestrian MapPedestrian Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 45 of 100
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
V e t e ransV e t e ransP a rkP a rk
27
BDOMINIK DRKRENEK TAP RDCOLGATEDRNORTH FOREST PWRAI
N
T
R
E
E
D
RUNIVERSITYOAKSBL
BRENTWO O D D RELIN
D
A
L
N
E
A
R
L
R
U
D
D
E
R
F
W
S
TEX
A
S
A
V
S UNIVERSITY DR EHARVEY RDDART
MOU
T
H
S
THOLLEM ANDRE1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8
Page 2 of 8See Page 1C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
V e t e ransV e t e ransP a rkP a rk
27
BDOMINIK DRCOLGATEDRMU
N
S
O
N
A
V
KRENEK TAP RDNORTH FOREST PWRAI
N
T
R
E
E
D
RUNIVERSITYOAKSBL
BRENTWO O D D RELIN
D
A
L
N
E
A
R
L
R
U
D
D
E
R
F
W
S
TEX
A
S
A
V
S UNIVERSITY DR EHARVEY RDDART
MOU
T
H
S
THOLLEMAN DR EEXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 4¹
0 0.50.25 Miles
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed! ! !
Sidewalk Existing
! ! !Sidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Schools/CSISD Property
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
nmPedestrian MapPedestrian Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 46 of 100
!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!C
33
31
30
3228
29
ANDERSONSTDEXTERDR
GLADESTDE
X
TERDRS
N
U
E
CESDR
LUTHER ST WTIMBERST
N DOWLING RDPENBERTHY
BL
NAVARRODRMO
N
T
C
L
A
I
R
A
V
CAIN RDQUAILRUNHAINES DR
LANGFORD
ST
GUADALUPEDRR
E
SE
A
RCHPWWEL
S
H
A
V
BALCONESDRJOHNKIMBROUGHBLC
O
K
E
S
T
OL
S
E
N
B
L LEWIS STJOE ROUTT BLBIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
T
OLDMAIND R PARKPLACE
DEACONDRH
OLLEMAN D R SGEORGE BUSHDRW
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
D HOLLEMAN DRGEORGE BUSH DR WTEXASAV
S
HOLLEMANDR
W
HAR
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
P
W
S
FM
2
1
5
4
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8
Page 3 of 8
See Page 1
See Page 4!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!C
33
31
30
3228
29
ANDERSONSTDEXTERDR
DEXTER
DRS
N UECES
D
R
LUTHER ST WN DOWLINGRDTIMBERST
FAI
R
V
I
E
W
A
V
PENBERTHY
BL
MO
N
T
C
L
A
I
R
A
V
CAIN RDQUAILRUNHAINES DR
LANGFORD
ST
GUADALUPEDRR
ESE
A
R
CHPWBALCONESDRNAVARRO DRWE
L
S
H
A
VJOHNKIMBROUGHBLLEWIS STJOE ROUTT BLOLDMAIND R
PARKPLACEC
O
K
E
S
T
OL
S
E
N
B
L
BIZ
Z
E
L
L
S
T
DEACONDRH
OLLEMA N D R SGEORGE BUSHDRWEL
L
B
O
R
N
R
D HOLLEMANDRGEORGE BUSH DR WTEXASAV
S
HOLLEMANDR
W
FM
2
1
5
4
HARV EY M I TC H E L L P W S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 5¹
0 0.50.25 Miles
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed! ! !
Sidewalk Existing
! ! !Sidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Schools/CSISD Property
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
nmPedestrian MapPedestrian Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 47 of 100
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!GRAHAM RDSOUTHW
O
ODDR
PO N D ERO SADRW O O D C R EEKDRBROTHERSBLRIO
G
R
A
N
D
E
B
L
E M ERA LD PWKRENEK TAP RDLO
N
GMIRE
DR
LANGFO
RD
ST FROSTD R
AIRLINED RARNOLDRDSEBESTA RDNORTH FOREST PWVALLEYVIEWDRNAVARRODRF O XFIREDRBALCONESDRTO D D TR
SANDSTON ED R
MEDICALAVBIRMINGHAMRDBRENTWO O D D REDEACONDRCORSAIRDRTEX
A
S
A
V
S
S
H
6
S
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
S
T
DARTMOUTHST
E
ARL
RUDDERFWSROCKPRAIRIERDHARVEYMITCHELLPWS1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8
Page 4 of 8
See Page 2
See Page 3!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!GRAHAM RDPO N D ERO SADRW O O D C R E E K D RKRENEK TAP RDLO
NGMIRE
DR
SOUTHW
O
ODDR
BR
OT
HERS
BL
RIO
GRANDEBL
LAN
GFO
R
D
S
T FROSTD R
AIRLINED R
ARNO LDRDSEBESTA RDNORTH FOREST PWNAVARRODRF O XFIREDRBALCONES DRTO D D TR
MEDICALAVBIRMINGHAMRDSANDSTON ED R
VALLEYVIEWDRBRENTWO O D D REDEACONDRE M ERA LD PWCORSAIRDRTEX
A
S
A
V
S
S
H
6
S
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
S
T
DARTMOUTHST
E
ARL
RUDDERFWSROCKPRAIRIERDHARVEYMITCHELLPWSEXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 6¹
0 0.50.25 Miles
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed! ! !
Sidewalk Existing
! ! !Sidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Schools/CSISD Property
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
nmPedestrian MapPedestrian Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 48 of 100
!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!!!!!C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
C O L L EGEC O L L EGES T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
35
34
C
EROCKPRAIRIERDWHO
L
L
EMAN
D
R
S
N D
O
W
L
I
N
G
R
D CAIN RDNAVARRODRQUAILRUNSDOWLINGRDCAIN
RD
GENERALPWDEACONDRTO
W
E
R
S
P
W
NGRAHAMRDWA
L
N
U
T
R
D DEACONDRWI &
GN
RDGREATOAKSDR
H
U
N
T
E
R'S
C
R
E
E
KR
DBLUE RIDGE DRHOP
E
S
CREEKRDFM
2
1
5
4
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8
Page 5 of 8
See Page 3
See Page 6!!!!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
C O L L EGEC O L L EGES T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
35
34
C
EROCK PRAIRIE RD WN D
O
W
L
I
N
G
R
D HOL
L
EMAN
D
R
S CAIN RDQUAILRUNSDOWLINGRD
POTTERLNCAIN
RD NAVARRODRGENERALPWTO
W
E
R
S
P
W
NGRAHAMRDWA
L
N
U
T
R
D DEACONDRWI &
GN
RDGR
E
AT
OAKSDRTIMBERLINEDRH
U
N
T
E
R'S
C
R
E
E
KR
DBLUE RIDGE DRHOP
E
S
CREEKRDDEACONDRFM
2
1
5
4
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
¹
0 0.50.25 Miles
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed! ! !
Sidewalk Existing
! ! !Sidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Schools/CSISD Property
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
nmPedestrian MapPedestrian Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 49 of 100
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!
!
!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
D
E
E
CAPSTONE DR GRAHAM RDCASTLEG A TEDREDELW
EISSAV
DEC
ATURDR
BARRONCUT-OFFRDARNOLDRDEAGLEAVMORTIER DRWSPHILLIPSPWBIRMINGH AMRDLO
N
GMIRE
DR
VICTORIAAVDEACON DRNE
W
P
O
R
T
L
N
ALE
X
A
N
D
R
I
A
A
V
GE
N
E
R
A
L
P
W
N GRAHAM RDI &
GN
R
D
F
M2
15
4
WILLIAMDFITCHPW BARRONRDROCK PRAIRIE RDSH
6S
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8
Page 6 of 8
See Page 4
See Page 5See Page 7!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
D
E
E
CAPSTONE DR GRAHAM RDCASTLEGA TEDREDELW
EISSAV
DEC
ATURDR
BARRONCUT-OFFRDARNO LDRDEAGLEAVWSPHILLIPS
P
WBIRMINGHAMRDMORTIER DRLO
N
G
M
I
R
E
D
RDEACON DRNE
W
P
O
R
T
L
N
GE
N
E
R
A
L
P
W
N GRAHAM RDI &
GN
R
D
VIC
T
O
R
I
A
A
V
ALEXANDRIAAV
F
M2
15
4
WILLIAMDFITCHPW BARRONRDROCK PRAIRIE RDSH
6S
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
See Page 8¹
0 0.50.25 Miles
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed! ! !
Sidewalk Existing
! ! !Sidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Schools/CSISD Property
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
nmPedestrian MapPedestrian Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 50 of 100
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!37
36
DE
C
A
T
U
R
D
R
C A STLE RO
C
K
PWCASTLEGATEDR
S OAKS DR
PEBBLECREEKPW
HU
NTER
CREE
KDRSPEARMAN D R
STANDREWS
DRALEXANDRIAA VPARKVIEW DRLAKEWAY
D
R
ARRINGTON RDWILLIAMDFITCHPWBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDROCK PR
A
I
R
I
E
R
D
SH
6
S
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8
Page 7 of 8See Page 6!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!37
36
DE
C
A
T
U
R
D
R
C ASTLERO
C
K
PWCASTLEGATEDR
S OAKS DR
HU
NTERCREEKD
R
SPE A R M A N DRSTANDREWS
DR
ALE
X
A
N
D
R
I
A
A
V PARKVIEW DRARRINGTONRDLAKEWAYDR
PEBBLECREEKPWBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RDSH
6
SWILLIAMDFITCHPW ROCK PR
A
I
R
I
E
R
D
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
¹
0 0.50.25 Miles
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed! ! !
Sidewalk Existing
! ! !Sidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Schools/CSISD Property
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
nmPedestrian MapPedestrian Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 51 of 100
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
38
40
39
CASTLEG A TEDRS DOWLINGRD
LIVE OAK ST
WS
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
WBARRONCUT-OFFRDC
REEKMEA
D
OW BLNETO
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
I&
G
N
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
WOODLAKEDR
KOPPE BRIDGE RDDY
M
P
L
E
L
N FRIERSONRDCAPSTONE DR
FM 2154GREENSPRAIRIERD1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8
Page 8 of 8
See Page 6 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !
C O L L EGE C O L L EGE S T A T IONS T A T IONE T JE T J
38
40
39GREENSPRAIRIERD CASTLEGA TEDRLIVE OAK ST
WS
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
WBARRONCUT-OFFRDSD O W LING RD VICTORIAAVETO
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
I&
G
N
R
D
RO
Y
D
E
R
R
D
WO
O
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
KOPPE BRIDGE RDDY
M
P
L
E
L
N FRIERSONRDCREEK
MEADOWBLN
CAPSTONE DR
FM 2154
EXISTING MAP PROPOSED MAP
¹
0 0.50.25 Miles
Grade Separation Existing
Grade Separation Funded
Grade Separation Proposed!!!
Shared-use Path ExistingShared-use Path FundedShared-use Path Proposed! ! !
Sidewalk Existing
! ! !Sidewalk FundedSidewalk Proposed
Schools/CSISD Property
CoCS Parks
CoCS Greenways
nmPedestrian MapPedestrian Map2021 Update2021 Update
Proposed Amendments Potential Alternatives
Page 52 of 100
August 5, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
August 5, 2021 6:00 p.m. Phone: *888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 958 6873 6981 Internet: https://zoom.us/s/95868736981
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Dennis Christiansen, Jeremy Osborne, Joe Guerra, Bobby Mirza, William Wright, and Jason Cornelius
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Bill Mather COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Linda Harvell CITY STAFF PRESENT: Michael Ostrowski, Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, Erika Bridges, Jason Schubert, Alma Guerra, Parker Mathews, Amy Milanes, Gary Melcher, Stephen Maldonado, Alyssa Halle-Schramm, Amy Albright, Derrick Williams, Robin Macias, Brandi Tedrick, Leslie Whitten, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
Chairman Christiansen called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
3. Informational Agenda
3.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
3.2 Discussion of Minor / Amending Plats approved by Staff:
• Crescent Pointe Subdivision Phase 2; Block 3, Lots 5R-1RA & 5R-1RB ~ Case #FPCO2020-000020
There was no discussion.
3.3 Introduction of new staff members in the Planning & Development Services Department. Director of Planning &Development Services Ostrowski introduced new staff members from the Planning & Development Services Department.
3.4 Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard:
Page 53 of 100
August 5, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
• A Rezoning from D Duplex to MF Multi-Family on approximately .3 acres located at 1531 Pine Ridge Drive. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 1, 2021 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on July 22, 2021 and voted (6-0) to approve the request.
There was general discussion.
3.5 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
• Thursday, August 12, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison - Guerra)
• Thursday, August 19, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, August 26, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting
5:00 p.m. (Liaison - Osborne)
• Thursday, September 2, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting and Impact Fee Advisory Committee
(IFAC) ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. There was general discussion. 3.6 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board. There was no discussion Consent Agenda 4.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
• July 15, 2021
Commissioner Cornelius motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Osborne seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action.
There were no items removed.
6. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Commissioner Guerra requested staff present the changes to the Thoroughfare Plan at the next Commission meeting. 8. Adjourn
Page 54 of 100
August 5, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
The meeting adjourned at 6:11 p.m.
The Planning & Zoning Commission adjourned into the Impact Fee Advisory Committee meeting. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Dennis Christiansen, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Page 55 of 100
Planning & Zoning Commission
August 19, 2021
Scale 16 single-family lots on approximately 25.3 acres
Location Generally located northeast of the intersection of Stousland Road and
Big Trail in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Property Owner Wellborn Winding Creek, LLC
Applicant Schultz Engineering, LLC
Project Manager Alma Guerra, Graduate Engineer II
aguerra@cstx.gov
Project Overview The proposed subdivision is located within the City of College Station
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction as part of the Winding Creek Estates
Preliminary Plan consisting of 87 lots and 2 common areas on
approximately 143 acres. The proposed final plat is a part of six planned
phases within the Winding Creek Subdivision.
Preliminary Plan April 2019
Public Infrastructure Total linear feet proposed:
2,350 Streets (Brazos County)
1,886 Water Lines (Wellborn SUD)
Parkland Dedication $625 per single-family lot will be required at the time of Final Plat
Traffic Impact Analysis Not required
Compliant with Comprehensive Plan
(including Master Plans) and Unified
Development Ordinance
Yes
Compliant with Subdivision
Regulations
Yes
Staff Recommendation Approval
Supporting Materials
1.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2.Final Plat
Final Plat
for
Winding Creek Estates Ph. 4
TRAKiT Project #FP2020-000038
Page 56 of 100
Page 57 of 100
Page 58 of 100
Page 59 of 100
RAIN MEADOW DRIVE
LEGEND OAKS COURTLOT 29
LOT 31
LOT 53 LOT 54 LOT 55 LOT 56 LOT 57
LOT 58
LOT 59
LOT 61
LOT 62
LOT 52
LOT 30
LOT 60
LOT 63
LOT 64
RAIN
M
E
A
D
O
W
D
R
I
V
E
1.479 AC.2.535AC.
1.151 AC.
1.020 AC.1.016 AC.1.016 AC.1.016 AC.
1.038 AC.
1.009 AC.
1.008 AC.
1.153 AC.
1.102 AC.
1.027 AC.
2.338 AC.
BLOCK 5 BLOCK 5
BLOCK 6
BLOCK 6
1.463 AC.
1.654AC.STOUSLAND ROADBIG
TRA
IL
RAIN MEADOW DRIVELOT 28
LOT 51
LOT 27
LOT 25
1.005 AC.
1.398 AC.
1.089 AC.
1.241AC.
FF=266.0
FF=269.0
FF=269.0
BLOCK 3
BLOCK 4 BENDING BRANCH DRIVECREEKCROSSING CT87
86
66
65
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 2
SADDLE CREEKSUBDIVISION PHASE 1
SADDLE CREEKSUBDIVISION PHASE 7A
FF=269.0 FF=269.0
BLOCK 4
BLOCK 4
FF=269.0
LOT 52
1.151 AC.STOUSLAND ROADBI
G
T
R
A
I
L
TBPE NO. 12327911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:
FINAL PLAT
WINDING CREEK ESTATES
PHASE 4
BLOCK 4, LOTS 29-31
BLOCK 5, LOTS 52-58
BLOCK 6, LOTS 59-64
25.343 AC, J.C. STUTEVILLE SURVEY, A-216
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
16 LOTS
SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
TBPELS FIRM # 10018500
SCALE 1'' = 100'NOVEMBER 2020
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
WELLBORN WINDING
CREEK, LLC
3000 Briarcrest Drive, Suite 302Bryan, TX 77802
(281) 642-4924
LEGEND
LEGEND
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
WE
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
D
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE J. C. STUTEVILLESURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 216, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 50.10 ACRE TRACTDESCRIBED AS TRACT 2 BY A DEED TO WELLBORN WINDING CREEK, LLC, RECORDED IN VOLUME 14484, PAGE 126 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLICRECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 1.256 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO WELLBORNWINDING CREEK, LLC RECORDED IN VOLUME 14977, PAGE 78 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND A PORTION OFTHE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 6.357 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO BLAKE CREEK INVESTMENTS, LLC RECORDED IN VOLUME 11997,PAGE 1 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS.
SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF STOUSLAND ROAD (VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.) MARKING A NORTHWESTCORNER OF SAID REMAINDER OF 50.10 ACRE TRACT AND A WESTERLY CORNER OF A CALLED 8.97 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TORICHARD L. BAUER AND WIFE, MELANIE S. BAUER, RECORDED IN VOLUME 8517, PAGE 110 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS, FOR REFERENCE COLLEGE STATION GEODETIC CONTROL STATION 14RQU5945778027 MONUMENT 4 BEARS: N 04° 56' 52” W FOR A DISTANCEOF 4765.22 FEET (COORDINATES AND BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREIN ARE NAD83 (TEXAS STATE PLANE CENTRAL ZONE GRID NORTH) BASED ONTHE PUBLISHED COORDINATES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION GEODETIC CONTROL STATION 14RQU5945778027 MONUMENT 4 [Y:10171032.038;X:3567536.952] AND AS ESTABLISHED BY GPS NETWORK OBSERVATION, DISTANCES SHOWN HEREIN ARE GRID DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED, AREAS DESCRIBED HEREIN AS MEASURED ARE CALCULATED FROM GRID DISTANCES, TO DETERMINE SURFACE DISTANCES, NOT SURFACEAREAS, MULTIPLY BY A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00007571045057 [CALCULATED USING GEOID12B]);
THENCE: S 48° 04' 00” E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 50.10 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 8.97 ACRE TRACT FOR ADISTANCE OF 232.53 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE SOUTH CORNER OF SAID 8.97 ACRE TRACT;
THENCE: N 42° 23' 27” E CONTINUING ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 50.10 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 8.97 ACRE TRACT,AT 495.02 FEET PASS A ½ INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE EAST CORNER OF SAID 8.97 ACRE TRACT AND THE SOUTH CORNER OF A CALLED
8.82 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO ERIC J. MITCHEM AND HOLLY MITCHEM RECORDED IN VOLUME 15681, PAGE 62 OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AT 691.41 FEET PASS A ½ INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE EAST CORNER OF A CALLED 8.82
ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO JASON LAYMON AND REBECCA LAYMON RECORDED IN VOLUME 14187, PAGE 73 OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND THE SOUTH CORNER OF A CALLED 17.64 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO HAROLDDICKEY, KAY DICKEY, SENETRA BROWN, VIRGINIA BROWN AND LASHAVIA BROWN RECORDED IN VOLUME 13865, PAGE 210 OF THE OFFICIALPUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, CONTINUE ON ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 50.10 ACRE TRACT AND SAID17.64 ACRE TRACT FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 1878.38 FEET TO A POST OAK TREE FOUND ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF THE REMAINDER OF ANUNDEVELOPED RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVED OUT OF A DEED TO HOUSTON AND TEXAS CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY RECORDED INVOLUME G, PAGE 583 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY CURRENTLY OWNED BY UNION PACIFICRAILROAD COMPANY;
THENCE: S 29° 19' 18” E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 50.10 ACRE TRACT AND SAID RAILROAD TRACT FOR ADISTANCE OF 8.07 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER POST FOUND MARKING A WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID REMAINDER OF 6.357 ACRE TRACT;
THENCE: N 54° 36' 47” E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID RAILROAD TRACT AND SAID REMAINDER OF 6.357 ACRE TRACT FOR ADISTANCE OF 49.78 FEET TO THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 6.357 ACRE TRACT AND SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISION, PHASE 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLATRECORDED IN VOLUME 7920, PAGE 176 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE: S 29° 19' 23” E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 6.357 ACRE TRACT SAND SAID PHASE 1 FOR A DISTANCE OF600.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 6.357 ACRE TRACT AND SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISION, PHASE 7A,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 8758, PAGE 126 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE: THROUGH SAID REMAINDER OF 6.357 ACRE TRACT, SAID REMAINDER OF 1.253 ACRE TRACT AND SAID REMAINDER OF 50.10 ACRETRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS:
S 63° 23' 58” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 256.85 FEET;
S 26° 36' 02” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 79.19 FEET;
S 63° 23' 58” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET;
N 72° 13' 36” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.74 FEET;
S 62° 08' 49” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 273.31 FEET;
S 19° 38' 49” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.78 FEET;
S 59° 47' 17” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 105.87 FEET;
S 22° 51' 11” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 320.64 FEET;
S 58° 27' 21” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 257.31 FEET;
S 27° 10' 51” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 478.34 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND ON THE NORTHERLY LINEOF WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 3 (NOT YET FILED OF RECORD) MARKING THE SOUTH CORNER OF THIS HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT;
THENCE: CONTINUING THROUGH SAID REMAINDER OF 50.10 ACRE TRACT AND ALONG THE FUTURE NORTHERLY LINE OF WINDING CREEKESTATES, PHASE 3, FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS:
N 62° 21' 59” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 402.06 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND MARKING THE BEGINNINGOF A COUNTERCLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 265.00 FEET;
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06° 10' 26” FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.56 FEET (CHORD BEARS: S 24° 32' 48” W -28.54 FEET) TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND MARKING THE END OF SAID CURVE;
N 68° 30' 44” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND;
S 64° 38' 49” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.22 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND;
N 72° 10' 19” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 142.61 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND MARKING THE BEGINNINGOF A COUNTERCLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 335.00 FEET;
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23° 50' 50” FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 139.43 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 84° 05' 44” W -138.43 FEET) TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND MARKING THE END OF SAID CURVE;
S 83° 58' 51” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 6.68FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND;
N 50° 54' 41” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.42 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED “KERR 4502” FOUND;
S 84° 11' 46” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.77 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF STOUSLAND ROAD;
THENCE: N 06° 01' 09” W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF STOUSLAND ROAD FOR A DISTANCE OF 298.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNINGCONTAINING 25.343 ACRES OF LAND AS MEASURED BY GRID DISTANCES, MORE OR LESS, AS SURVEYED ON THE GROUND.
THENCF:
INSET "A"
1" = 40'
Page 60 of 100
August 19, 2021
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – Benjamin Graham Subdivision
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Jesse DiMeolo, Staff Planner
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance
amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2
“Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from R Rural to WC Wellborn Commercial on approximately one acre located
in the Benjamin Graham Subdivision, Block B, Lots 1-6, generally located at 14889-14895 FM 2154. Case
# REZ2021-000005 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the August 26, 2021, City
Council Meeting – Subject to change).
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 1 acre of land located on FM 2154 (Wellborn Road),
between Madison Street and Victoria Avenue, from R Rural to WC Wellborn Commercial. The tract was
originally zoned R Rural upon annexation into the City in 2011. This zoning request is in effort to bring
the existing businesses into compliance for future development.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject tract is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as
Wellborn Commercial and is a part of the Wellborn Community Plan which was adopted by City
Council on April 25, 2013. Wellborn Commercial is generally for concentrations of commercial
activities that focus primarily on the nearby residents versus the larger community. Such uses
should be limited in size and not accommodate for drive-thru services. Specific design elements
described in the Wellborn Community Plan for Wellborn-area businesses have been incorporated
into the development standards of the zoning to limit the visual impact on the community and
enhance the defined character. The proposed zoning permits retail sales and service, allowing the
property to be developed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The existing R Rural zoning allows for a mix of large acreages and large-lot residential
developments, which is incompatible with the development in this area of the Wellborn
Community Plan. Given the property’s proximity to other businesses along FM 2154 and its
designation Wellborn Commercial in the Comprehensive Plan, a rezoning to WC Wellborn
Commercial will allow for commercial development supporting the economic growth along this
primary corridor. The continuation of commercial development is compatible with other
businesses in the area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject property is suitable for commercial uses. The site has
adequate space to meet the minimal dimensional standards for the WC Wellborn Commercial
district. There is no floodplain on the property.
Page 61 of 100
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
Domestic water and fire flow service for this tract will be provided by Wellborn SUD. Wastewater
service for this tract will be provided by College Station via a sewer line located in the adjacent
alley.
Detention is required in accordance with the BCS guidelines. Drainage and any other
infrastructure required with the site development shall be designed and constructed in
accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines.
The subject property has frontage to FM 2154 and Madison Street. FM 2154 is classified as a
future 4-lane Major Arterial on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. Madison Street is a local street. A
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required for the rezoning request as the applicant showed the
anticipated trip generation to be less than the threshold of 150 trips in the peak hour. At this
time, infrastructure is adequate for the uses permitted by the proposed WC Wellborn Commercial
zoning district.
5. The marketability of the property:
The applicant has stated that the current R Rural zoning is not the highest and best use for the
property. The market price of the land exceeds the allowed use of the property and therefore is
not marketable without a rezoning.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2. Future Land Use Map
3. Rezoning Map
4. Rezoning Exhibit
5. Background Information
6. Applicant’s Supporting Information
Page 62 of 100
Page 63 of 100
Page 64 of 100
Page 65 of 100
Rezone
N.T.S.
Benjamin Graham
Subdivision
Block B, Lots 1-6
Being Andrew McMahon Survey, A-167 ,
~1.023 Acres
College Station, Brazos County, Texas
July 2021
Surveyor:
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave
Bryan, TX 77803
Firm No. 10018500
RPLS No. 4502
Job No. 21-190
Engineer:
PO Box 5192Bryan, TX 77805
979-739-0567
TBPE F-9951
Owner:
Karim Maknojia
317 Barnberry
College Station, TX 77845
“”
”
”“”
”
”
”
”
Page 68 of 100
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 19, 2021
Advertised Council Hearing Date: August 26, 2021
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Sweetwater, Sweetwater Forest, Turnberry Circle, Wellborn Oaks, Creek Meadows, Royder Ridge
Property owner notices mailed: 15
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts: One at the time of this report
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North
(across Madison Street) Wellborn Commercial R Rural Post Office
South Wellborn Commercial R Rural Single-family home
East Wellborn Commercial R Rural Single-family home
West
(across FM 2154) Wellborn Commercial R Rural Single-family home
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 2011
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation
2011 – A-O Agricultural Open to R-Rural
Final Plat: Benjamin Graham Subdivision, Lots 1-6, Block B (1894)
Site development: Small grocery store and restaurant with undeveloped lot in-between
Page 69 of 100
Name of Project:WELLBORN COMMERCIAL
Address:14889 FM 2154
Legal Description:WELLBORN, BLOCK B, LOT 1 & 2
Total Acreage:1.032
Applicant::
Property Owner:IGLOO ENTERPRISES INC
J4 ENGINEERING
List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change
necessary.
This is a growing area of College Station that is very attractive to residential buyers. As a result, commercial
development along Wellborn Road is expanding in order to provide needed services to the residential
neighborhoods.
Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
explain why the Plan is incorrect.
The current land use plan for this property is Wellborn Commercial.
How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby
property and with the character of the neighborhood?
The property is not suitable for development under the current zoning which allows estate type lots of 1-3 acres.
With the changing conditions in the area and the high marketability of the proposed zoning under the land use
plan, this type of development is not attractive. In addition, expansion or re-development of the property cannot
occur without the rezoning.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
As noted above, Wellborn Commercial is the projected zoning and fits the currently developed conditions.
REZONING APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Page 1 of 2
Page 70 of 100
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
As noted above, Wellborn Commercial is the projected zoning and fits the currently developed conditions.
Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
The current zoning is Rural which is not the highest and best use for the property. As a result, the market price
of the land exceeds the allowed use of the property and therefore is not marketable without a rezoning.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
N/A
Page 2 of 2
Page 71 of 100
August 19, 2021
Regular Agenda
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Rachel Lazo, Senior Planner
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map from Suburban
Commercial to Urban for approximately 10 acres, generally located at 1660 Graham Road. Case
#CPA2021-000002 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 9, 2021 City
Council Meeting- Subject to change.)
RECOMMENDATION: Staff
recommends approval of the
request to Urban with the
understanding that if this request
is approved by City Council, the
10-year Comprehensive Plan
update will necessitate a
redesignation to Mixed
Residential, which best reflects
the proposed townhouse uses and
inherently limits the scale and
density of this development.
Summary: The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
and Character Map from Suburban Commercial to Urban on approximately 10 acres located west of
the existing International Leadership of Texas public charter school campus. The subject property
and properties to the north and east are primarily designated as Suburban Commercial on the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map, while the properties to the west and
south are General Suburban.
In February 2021, City Council denied a Comprehensive Plan Amendment request for Urban on the
same parcel, as the former developer – at the time – intended to develop a multi-family product.
This request is accompanied by a rezoning request for a PDD Planned Development District with a T
Townhouse base to allow for a transitional single-family residential use between the Dove Crossing
Subdivision and the ILT charter school campus.
This application also precedes the 10-year Comprehensive Plan update, which will eliminate the
Urban land use designation and reclassify all properties that were previously designated as Urban.
The new Mixed Residential land use will be the most appropriate for the townhouse uses proposed
with this development.
Page 72 of 100
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Changed or changing conditions in the subject area of the City: The subject property and
properties to the north and east have a future land use designation of Suburban Commercial
with Natural Areas Reserved along Lick Creek. The Suburban Commercial land use
designation is generally for concentrations of commercial activities that cater primarily to
nearby residents versus the larger community or region. Generally, these areas tend to be
small in size and located adjacent to major roads (arterials and collectors). The design of
structures is intended to be compatible with surrounding single-family residential
neighborhoods. Institutional/Public is located to the north across Graham Road at the City of
College Station’s Public Utilities site. The property to the northwest across Graham Road is
designated as Medical Use with a small portion of Natural Areas Reserved along Lick Creek.
Properties to the west and south have a General Suburban land use designation and are
developed as residential properties within the Dove Crossing Subdivision.
The subject property is adjacent to both the Medical District Master Plan area and the
Spring Creek District, which is generally the area located along State Highway 6 near the
Rock Prairie Road interchange and the Spring Creek Business Park. This area includes the
major medical centers of Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, CHI St. Joseph Health
College Station Hospital, as well as a number of other medical related facilities and a master
planned, City-owned business park. The focus of development in this area should be linking
current and future medical facilities into a cohesive district which incorporates the natural
features of Lick Creek and Spring Creek into the design of the district.
The area near the intersection of Longmire and Graham Road has continued to grow with
the development of the adjacent ILT school to the east and an optometry office. Other uses
in this area include, but not limited to parks, hospitals, commercial retail (banks, hotels, and
grocery stores), public utilities, offices, and single-family residential. These variety of uses
support a variety of housing types, however the area is primarily single-family detached
homes.
The Urban designation allows for an intense level of development activities and consists of
townhomes, duplexes, and high-density apartments. An amendment to Urban would lay
the foundation for providing a higher concentration of dwelling units located within walking
distance to a school, grocery store, medical offices, and employment centers, which could
ultimately lead to a more walkable pedestrian friendly neighborhood.
Since the area was annexed in December of 1993, the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
and Character Map has remained largely unchanged for this part of town.
2. Compatibility with the existing uses, development patterns, and character of the
immediate area concerned, the general area, and the City as a whole: The applicant is
requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use and Character Map to Urban. The Urban
designation is generally for areas that should have a very intense level of development
activities. These areas will tend to consist of townhomes, duplexes, and high-density
apartments.
The property has an existing single-family home, and the adjacent property to the east is the
Page 73 of 100
International Leadership of Texas campus located on approximately 14.38 acres. To the south
and west is the Dove Crossing Subdivision with an overall density of 4.23 dwelling units per
acre. North across Graham Road, is approximately 47.43 acres owned by the City of College
Station, some of which hosts the City of College Station’s fleet services and public utilities.
A higher concentration of dwelling units per acre would support the nearby parks,
commercial retail (banks, hotels, and grocery stores), offices, and the city’s medical corridor.
Additionally, it would provide an appropriate transition and step down of the intensity of
land uses from the commercially zoned areas along Rock Prairie and Highway 6, as you
would go from medical facilities to a grocery store, hotel, school, this urban designation
which would allow for a future attached single-family development, and then the
surrounding single-family detached homes.
3. Impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas: While the subject property is
located nearby Lick Creek, there is no FEMA designated floodplain on the property. The
applicant has stated that the subject property will follow city codes and ordinances and will
not have adverse impacts on the surrounding areas.
4. Impacts on infrastructure including water, wastewater, drainage, and the transportation
network: This property was assumed as a Suburban Commercial land use within the City’s
currently adopted Water and Wastewater Master Plans. The applicant provided City staff
with anticipated demands for the proposed Urban Future Land Use. These demands were
loaded into the City’s water and wastewater models to determine if adequate capacity exists
for the proposed higher density land use type.
The results of the water distribution model scenario indicate that adequate domestic water
capacity is available. However, the wastewater collection system model output
demonstrated capacity concerns. Any near-term rezoning proposal to an urban intensity use
would have to be carefully considered as further analysis shows significant downstream
sanitary sewer system improvements would be required at the developer’s expense and
would include upgrades to an existing lift station, as well as the upsizing of approximately
3,250 LF of sanitary sewer mains.
However, there is an approved capital project that is expected to be completed within the
next three to four years that will provide the necessary capacity for this higher density land
use type. The completion of this City funded CIP would eliminate the need for a developer to
provide the currently identified downstream improvements. The applicant has also proposed
that the development would be phased to account for sewer capacity issues as needed and if
applicable.
Drainage and other public infrastructure is required with site development shall be designed
and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. A traffic impact
analysis (TIA) is not required with a comprehensive plan amendment request; however, with
a rezoning using T Townhouse as a base zoning – as is requested in the accompanying
application – a TIA would not be required as it does not exceed 150 trips in the peak hour.
Both Graham Road and nearby Longmire Drive are constructed to their full cross sections as
2-lane Major Collectors per the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. The subject property also has two
public streets projected to the subject property; Crystal Dove Avenue to the west and White
Page 74 of 100
Dove Trail to the south. The proposed Urban land use amendment could create a more
intense land use in an area that has experienced traffic issues during drop-off and pick-up
times of the adjacent ILT school campus to the east. It is not uncommon however for
queueing issues to exist around school sites during these times. Both Graham Road and
Longmire Drive are designated and constructed to their Major Collector cross sections and a
traffic signal was installed at their intersection by ILT. Based on the trip rate table provided in
the UDO, future townhouse development could generate less trips per acre than the
adjacent General Suburban uses (7.28 trips per acre vs. 8 trips per acre). It has the potential
to actually generate fewer trips per acre than a Suburban Commercial zoning, which could
have 40 trips per acre though there is much variability in commercial trip generation
depending upon the end use. These rates are based on national averages and the actual
resulting trip rate will depend upon the specific use developed.
5. Consistency with the goals and strategies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan: The goal for
College Station’s Future Land Use and Character Map is to create a community with strong,
unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a
protected and enhanced natural environment. The subject property and surrounding areas to
the north and east are designated as suburban commercial. This designation intends to
provide for concentrations of commercial activities that cater primarily to nearby residents.
The design of these structures are compatible in size and design with the surrounding single-
family residential uses.
An Urban designation may be appropriate for this property as a transitional land use
between the established Dove Crossing subdivision, located within walking distance to a
school (ILT campus), grocery store (Kroger), medical offices, and employment centers. Any
land use change would support more housing diversity in an area that is largely suburban,
and it could provide professionals who work in the medical corridor more housing options
near their places of employment.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request to Urban with the understanding that
if this request is approved by City Council, the 10-year Comprehensive Plan update will necessitate a
redesignation to Mixed Residential, which best reflects the proposed townhouse uses and inherently
limits the scale and density of this development.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2. Comprehensive Plan Exhibit
3. Background Information
4. Applicant’s Supporting Information
5. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map
Page 75 of 100
Page 76 of 100
Page 77 of 100
Page 78 of 100
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 19, 2021
Advertised Council Hearing Date: September 9,2021
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Dove Crossing and Bridle Gate HOAs
Property owner notices mailed: 49
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition: One at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North
Graham Rd.
(2-Land Major
Collector)
N/A
Graham Rd.
(2-Land Major
Collector)
South General Suburban General Suburban Single-Family
Residential
East Suburban Commercial Rural Public Facility
(ILT School)
West General Suburban General Suburban Single-Family
Residential
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1993
Zoning:A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation
A-O Agricultural Open renamed to R Rural in 2013
Final Plat: Unplatted
Site development:Undeveloped
Page 80 of 100
Name of Project:1660 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Address:1660 GRAHAM RD
Legal Description:A005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 42, 10. ACRES
Total Acreage:10
Applicant::
Property Owner:HERRING MARY ELIZABETH
MITCHELL & MORGAN
What element of the Comprehensive Plan and at what location is requested to be amended?
Land Use Plan Amendment at 1660 Graham Road
What is the amendment requested?
We request to amend the Land Use Plan from Suburban Commercial to Urban.
COMP PLAN APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
What is the reason for the amendment?
As College Station continues to grow, so do housing needs. There is a need to expand the housing market
inventory and offer a wider variety of housing. The property owner has made several attempts over the years to
pursue single-family development, without success due to the need for higher density on this tract. The City
Council recently determined that high-density multi-family was not compatible with the neighboring subdivision.
Given the need for more and the desire to produce a development that is most appropriate for the area, we
propose townhomes.
Page 1 of 2
Page 81 of 100
How will this change be compatible with the existing uses, development patterns, and character of the
immediate area concerned, the general area, and the city as a whole?
We are requesting the rezoning to allow townhome development on this property. After having been
unsuccessful in developing the property for traditional single-family development, the owner has explored other
options for residential development. This area of College Station is saturated with Suburban Commercial land
uses, but there is a need for a more diverse housing stock. However, in response to the concerns brough forth
from the neighborhood at the recent request for multi-family residential, we believe townhomes are a suitable
and compatible development for the property that satisfy all concerns and desires for the property.
In recent years, sewer capacity has been a concern for allowing more dense development. The City is currently
planning improvements to the area wastewater system which would be able to accommodate medium density
residential development. The developer will time the construction of the townhomes, such that when the sewer
improvements are complete, the first phase of development will be ready to be occupied. Additionally, increased
traffic has been a concern, especially at the Longmire Drive and Graham Road intersection. A traffic light was
installed in July 2018 improving the safety and efficiency of traffic at the intersection.
Explain the impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas and infrastructure, including water,
wastewater, drainage and transportation network.
This property lies between the International Leadership of Texas (IL Texas) school and the Dove Crossing
neighborhood. Having townhomes in between the two developments helps transition the land uses from a
single-family neighborhood to more intense development. The density we are proposing is less dense than a
traditional townhome development allowing it to be more compatible with the adjacent neighborhood. The
general area is made up of a diverse mix of uses including single-family residential, medical facilities, general
commercial, and a school. Townhomes would contribute to the mix of uses and add to the diverse character of
the area, while still being a single-family residential development.
Explain how this change will be consistant with the goals and strategies set forth in the Comprehensive
Plan.
This property lies between the International Leadership of Texas (IL Texas) school and the Dove Crossing
neighborhood. Having townhomes in between the two developments helps transition the land uses from a
single-family neighborhood to more intense development. The density we are proposing is less dense than a
traditional townhome development allowing it to be more compatible with the adjacent neighborhood. The
general area is made up of a diverse mix of uses including single-family residential, medical facilities, general
commercial, and a school. Townhomes would contribute to the mix of uses and add to the diverse character of
the area, while still being a single-family residential development.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
N/A
List any other additional properties.
N/A
Page 2 of 2
Page 82 of 100
8532417101467412111813925191516212222023261BIRMINGHAM RDGRAHAM RDBIRMINGHAM RDGRAHAM RD8532417101467412111813925191516212222023261EXISTINGLand Use PlanAmendment MapT. 979.260.6963F. 979.260.35643204 Earl Rudder FWY SCollege Station, TX 77845Plan & Design Specialists in Civil ꞏ Engineering ꞏ HydraulicsHydrology ꞏ Utilities ꞏ StreetsSite Plans ꞏ Subdivisionswww.mitchellandmorgan.comEx. BJune2021All data is provided in NAD-83 State Plain Texas Central (Feet) horizontal datum and the 1988 North American Vertical Datum.1660Graham Road£1 inch = 150 feetHERRING MARY ELIZABETHA005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 42Acres: 10.0Current Zoning: RuralCurrent Land Use: Suburban CommercialPROPOSEDHERRING MARY ELIZABETHA005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 42Acres: 10.0Proposed Zoning: Planned Development DistrictProposed Land Use: UrbanNOTE: This site does not lie within the 100-year floodplain boundary per FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map panels 48041C0310F, Effective Date: April 2, 2014Thoroughfare Plan LegendPROPOSED 2-LANE MINOR COLLECTOREXISTING 2-LANE MAJOR COLLECTORGRAHAM RDROCK PRAIRIE RDS T AT E H IG H W A Y 6SITEVICINITY MAPLand Use Plan LegendGeneral SuburbanSuburban CommercialUrbanPage 83 of 100
Page 1 of 4
August 19, 2021
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – 1660 Graham PDD
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Rachel Lazo, Senior Planner
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance
amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2
“Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundary from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 10 acres
of land generally located at 1660 Graham Road. Case # REZ2021-000006 (Note: Final action of this item
will be considered at the September 9, 2021 City Council Meeting – Subject to change).
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request and associated concept plan.
Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 10 acres of land adjacent to the Dove Crossing
subdivision and located near the intersection of Graham Road and Longmire Drive from R Rural to PDD
Planned Development District with a base zoning district of T Townhouse.
In February 2021, City Council denied a Comprehensive Plan Amendment request for Urban on the same
parcel, as the former developer – at the time – intended to develop a multi-family product. On August 2,
2021 the developer hosted a neighborhood meeting to gather feedback from the surrounding Dove
Crossing and Bridle Gate residents. The meeting generated productive conversation regarding the
residents concerns about traffic, noise, light, and height of the structures. The PDD includes the
developer’s response to that feedback.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject property is currently designated as Suburban Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use and Character Map. This request to rezone the property accompanies a request
to change the land use designation to Urban. The Urban land use designation is intended for
areas that should have a more intense level of development activity typically consisting of
townhomes, duplexes, and high-density multi-family. The property is currently zoned R Rural, a
zoning district for large lot single-family and agricultural uses. The proposed zoning permits
attached low to medium density single-family townhomes, allowing the property to be developed
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan assuming the associated Comprehensive Plan
Amendment is be approved.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of
the surrounding area:
The proposed zoning allows for medium density single-family residential uses, which is compatible
with the existing uses in the surrounding area. Given the property’s close proximity to multiple
single-family neighborhoods, and if the property is redesignated as Urban, a PDD which allows for
a townhouse development will support the planned growth in the area. The continuation of
single-family is compatible with the nearby single-family neighborhoods and supports the nearby
Page 84 of 100
Page 2 of 4
commercial and medical office uses. The intent of the rezoning is to provide a unique townhouse
development that is complimentary but separate from the Dove Crossing subdivision.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The property has over 530 feet of frontage and takes access to Graham Road, which is an existing
Major Collector. The proposed PDD is suitable for the higher densities and more intense land uses
that a major collector can support. It is the applicant’s intent to create a unique, single-family,
individually-owned, townhouse product. The subject property is not in the FEMA floodplain. The
subject property is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
This property was assumed as a Suburban Commercial land use within the City’s currently adopted
Water and Wastewater Master Plans. The applicant provided City staff with anticipated demands
for the proposed Urban Future Land Use. These demands were loaded into the City’s water and
wastewater models to determine if adequate capacity exists for the proposed higher density land
use type.
The results of the water distribution model scenario indicate that adequate domestic water
capacity is available. However, the wastewater collection system model output demonstrated
capacity concerns. Analysis shows significant downstream sanitary sewer system improvements
would be required at the developer’s expense and would include upgrades to an existing lift
station, as well as the upsizing of approximately 3,250 LF of sanitary sewer mains.
However, there is an approved capital project that is expected to be completed within the next
three to four years that will provide the necessary capacity for this higher density land use type.
The completion of this City funded CIP would eliminate the need for a developer to provide the
currently identified downstream improvements. The applicant has also proposed that the
development would be phased to account for sewer capacity issues as needed and if applicable.
Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines.
A traffic impact analysis (TIA) is not required for a rezoning using T Townhouse as a base zoning –
as it does not exceed 150 trips in the peak hour. Both Graham Road and nearby Longmire Drive
are constructed to their full cross sections as 2-lane Major Collectors per the City’s Thoroughfare
Plan. The subject property also has two public streets projected to the subject property; Crystal
Dove Avenue to the west and White Dove Trail to the south.
The proposed request could create a more intense land use that generates additional traffic in an
area that has experienced traffic issues during drop-off and pick-up times of the adjacent ILT
school campus to the east. It is not uncommon however for queueing issues to exist around
school sites during these times. Both Graham Road and Longmire Drive are designated and
constructed to their Major Collector cross sections and a traffic signal was installed at their
intersection by ILT. Based on the trip rate table provided in the UDO, future townhouse
development could generate less trips per acre than the adjacent General Suburban uses (7.28
trips per acre vs. 8 trips per acre). It has the potential to generate fewer trips per acre than a
Suburban Commercial zoning, which could have 40 trips per acre though there is much variability
Page 85 of 100
Page 3 of 4
in commercial trip generation depending upon the end use. These rates are based on national
averages and the actual resulting trip rate will depend upon the specific use developed.
5. The marketability of the property:
A 10-acre Rural property in central College Station is not marketable for the permitted agricultural
uses. However, a rezoning request for a townhouse product that is sensitive to the surrounding
established homes and charter school site is more marketable than the present zoning. This is
anticipated to increase the marketability of the property.
REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN
The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building and
parking areas as well as other site related features. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also
request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those
variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development.
The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for
reviewing PDD Concept Plans:
1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with
the character of the surrounding area;
2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose
of this Section;
3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not
adversely affect adjacent development;
4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street
directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association;
5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not
limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities;
6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or
pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the
proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and
land uses in the area.
Modifications Requested: At the time of development, the property will meet all the applicable
requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for the T Townhouse zoning district with
the following modifications:
• Section 5.2 Residential Dimensional Standards
o 15-foot rear setback in lieu of the required 20-foot rear setback
• Section 8.3.E.2 Relation to Adjoining Street System:
o Provide gated emergency-only access at White Dove Trail and Crystal Dove Avenue in lieu
Page 86 of 100
Page 4 of 4
of a public street.
• Section 8.3.H.1.h Lots:
o Provide access via private access easement in lieu of frontage to a public street.
• Section 8.3.H.1.h Lots:
o Lots with frontage to Graham Road are not required to have access provided by a rear
alley. Instead, all lots will have access to a private access easement.
Community Benefits: The applicant offers the following as community benefits:
• A maximum of 11 dwelling units per acre.
• 5-foot landscaped buffer along shared property lines adjacent to Dove Crossing.
• A maximum building height of 25 feet, measured at the eave.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request and associated concept plan.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2. Background Information
3. Rezoning Map
4. Rezoning Exhibit
5. Applicant’s Supporting Information
6. Concept Plan
7. Bulk Variances Letter
Page 87 of 100
Page 88 of 100
Page 89 of 100
Page 90 of 100
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 19, 2021
Advertised Council Hearing Date: September 9, 2021
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Dove Crossing and Bridle Gate HOAs
Property owner notices mailed: 49
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition: One at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North
Graham Rd.
(2-Land Major
Collector)
N/A
Graham Rd.
(2-Land Major
Collector)
South General Suburban General Suburban Single-Family
Residential
East Suburban Commercial Rural Public Facility
(ILT School)
West General Suburban General Suburban Single-Family
Residential
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1993
Zoning:A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation
A-O Agricultural Open renamed to R Rural in 2013
Final Plat: Unplatted
Site development:Undeveloped
Page 91 of 100
8532417101467412111813925191516212222023261BIRMINGHAM RDGRAHAM RDBIRMINGHAM RDGRAHAM RD8532417101467412111813925191516212222023261EXISTINGRezoningMapT. 979.260.6963F. 979.260.35643204 Earl Rudder FWY SCollege Station, TX 77845Plan & Design Specialists in Civil ꞏ Engineering ꞏ HydraulicsHydrology ꞏ Utilities ꞏ StreetsSite Plans ꞏ Subdivisionswww.mitchellandmorgan.comEx. AJune2021All data is provided in NAD-83 State Plain Texas Central (Feet) horizontal datum and the 1988 North American Vertical Datum.1660Graham Road£1 inch = 150 feetHERRING MARY ELIZABETHA005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 42Acres: 10.0Current Zoning: RuralCurrent Land Use: Suburban CommercialPROPOSEDHERRING MARY ELIZABETHA005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 42Acres: 10.0Proposed Zoning: Planned Development DistrictProposed Land Use: UrbanZoning DistrictLegendGeneral SuburbanPlanned Development DistrictRuralNOTE: This site does not lie within the 100-year floodplain boundary per FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map panels 48041C0310F, Effective Date: April 2, 2014Thoroughfare Plan LegendPROPOSED 2-LANE MINOR COLLECTOREXISTING 2-LANE MAJOR COLLECTORGRAHAM RDROCK PRAIRIE RDS T AT E H IG H W A Y 6SITEVICINITY MAPPage 93 of 100
Name of Project: 1660 GRAHAM ROAD TOWNHOMES PDD
Address: 1660 GRAHAM RD
Legal Description: A005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 42, 10. ACRES
Total Acreage: 10
Applicant: MITCHELL & MORGAN
Property Owner: HERRING MARY ELIZABETH
List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change
necessary.
We are requesting the rezoning to allow townhome development on this property. After having been
unsuccessful in developing the property for traditional single-family development, the owner has explored
other options for residential development. This area of College Station is saturated with Suburban Commercial
land uses, but there is a need for a more diverse housing stock. However, in response to the concerns brough
forth from the neighborhood at the recent request for multi-family residential, we believe townhomes are a
suitable and compatible development for the property that satisfy all concerns and desires for the property.
In recent years, sewer capacity has been a concern for allowing more dense development. The City is
currently planning improvements to the area wastewater system which would be able to accommodate
medium density residential development. The developer will time the construction of the townhomes, such that
when the sewer improvements are complete, the first phase of development will be ready to be occupied.
Additionally, increased traffic has been a concern, especially at the Longmire Drive and Graham Road
intersection. A traffic light was installed in July 2018 improving the safety and efficiency of traffic at the
intersection.
Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
explain why the Plan is incorrect.
We have requested a Land Use Plan Amendment from Suburban Commercial to Urban, as this is the only
land use category that allows townhomes. We believe residential development is most appropriate for this
property, and in response to the feedback from the neighborhood and City Council, we believe this type of
residential development is most appropriate for this property.
How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby
property and with the character of the neighborhood?
The current zoning district is R Rural. This is the zoning district that was applied to the property upon
annexation. While the existing single-family house is in compliance with the zoning, it is not the highest and
best use for the property.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
Townhomes are a suitable land use for this property as they are a medium density single-family product,
REZONING PDD APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Page 1 of 4
Page 94 of 100
similar to the established Dove Crossing neighborhood. Townhomes will contribute to the needed diversity in
the housing stock and will provide a much-needed option for first time owners looking for a residence.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
Townhomes are a suitable land use for this property as they are a medium density single-family product,
similar to the established Dove Crossing neighborhood. Townhomes will contribute to the needed diversity in
the housing stock and will provide a much-needed option for first time owners looking for a residence.
Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
The property is not marketable for Rural uses. The area around it has developed into a medical district and
medium density single-family residential area. Rural uses are out of character for this location.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
N/A
Building Heights.
25'
Proposed Drainage.
Stormwater will be designed according to BCS Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines and will be collected in
an underground stormwater system.
Variations Sought.
Please see the attached letter.
Community Benefits.
Please see the attached letter.
Page 2 of 4
Page 95 of 100
Sustained Stability.
Townhomes are a medium density single-family product, which will be in character with the adjacent Dove
Crossing neighborhood. We expect to see a similar owner/renter composition as Dove Crossing and will
contribute to the stability of the established residential area of the surrounding area.
Conformity.
The Community Character chapter of the Comprehensive Plan states a desire to ensure new neighborhoods
are sustainable. The plan states, ³New neighborhoods should remain vibrant well into the future. Sustainable
neighborhoods require a balance between owner and renter occupancy; access to neighborhood-serving
businesses; parks and open space; transportation facilities designed for the density of the neighborhood; and
access to and connectivity with adjacent neighborhoods.´The proposed townhome development will include
all of these desired elements and will contribute to the established character of the Graham Road corridor.
Compatibility with use.
The Concept Plan proposes a townhome development that will have access to Graham Road and emergency
access only from White Dove Trail. Townhomes are considered a single-family product and is expected to be
similar to the owner/renter composition of Dove Crossing, making it a compatible neighbor to the
neighborhood.
Access to Streets.
The townhomes will have access to a street network that will connect to Graham Road and White Dove Trail.
Public Improvements.
This development will provide all necessary infrastructure to the site. Sidewalks are available on Graham
Road.
Public Health.
The Concept Plan proposes uses that conform to the developed uses of the surrounding area. This
development will not be a detriment to the public health, safety or welfare to the surrounding properties, but
will serve as a compatible single-family development for the area.
Safety.
Page 3 of 4
Page 96 of 100
The Concept Plan proposes primary access to Graham Road and emergency access only from White Dove
Trail, which will limit the amount of traffic from this development from impacting the Dove Crossing subdivision.
Additionally, there will be access to sidewalks and bike lanes along Graham Road to encourage alternative
modes of transportation. These elements contribute to the convenience and safety of vehicles and pedestrians
for the residents of this development as well as other drivers and pedestrians utilizing these facilities.
Page 4 of 4
Page 97 of 100
WHITE DOVE TRAIL
GRAHAM ROADTOWNHOUSES
& POOL
CRYSTAL DOVEAVENUE911 EMERGENCYACCESS GATE
TOWNHOUSESACCESSACCESS
ACCESSACCESS
TOWNHOUSESTOWNHOUSESTOWNHOUSES
TOWNHOUSESTOWNHOUSES
BUFFER YARD BUFFER YARD
BUFFER YARD
BUFFER YARD
911 EMERGENCYACCESS GATE
SITE
NOTES:
1. TOTAL SITE AREA: 10 AC.
2. BASE ZONING: T TOWNHOMES
3. THERE IS NO FEMA REGULATED 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN ON THIS SITE PER FEMA MAP PANEL
#48041C0310F DATED APRIL 2, 2014.
4. THE DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT INCLUDE PARKS, GREENWAYS, CONSERVATION AREAS, SCHOOLS,
OR TRAILS.
5. ALL SITE LIGHTING WILL COMPLY WITH CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ORDINANCES.
6. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 25'
7. DETENTION WILL BE PROVIDED IN AN UNDERGROUND SYSTEM.
8. PLEASE SEE THE MERITORIOUS MODIFICATIONS LETTER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
CP1CONCEPT PLAN1 inch = 40 feet
Page 98 of 100
Page 99 of 100
Page 100 of 100