HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/06/2021 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionCollege Station, TX
Meeting Agenda
Planning and Zoning Commission
Phone:*888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 917 1110 0923
Internet: https://zoom.us/s/91711100923
The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting.
May 6, 2021 6:00 PM 1101 Texas AvenueCollege Station, Texas 77840
College Station, TX Page 1
*The City uses a thirdparty vendor to help host the meeting and if the callin number is not
functioning access will be through the internet link only.
1.Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
2.Hear Visitors.
Speaker Protocol: An individual who wishes to address the Commission regarding any item on the
Regular Agenda, shall register with the Commission Secretary prior to 4 p.m. on the day of the
meeting. To register, the individual must provide a name and phone number by calling 979.764.3751
or emailing khejny@cstx.gov prior to 4 p.m. To submit written comments to the Commission, email
khejny@cstx.gov and they will be distributed to the Commission. Upon being called to speak, an
individual must state their name and city of residence, including the state of residence if the city is
located out of state. Speakers are encouraged to identify their College Station neighborhood or
geographic location. Each speaker's remarks are limited to three (3) minutes. Any speaker
addressing the Commission through the use of a translator may speak for six (6) minutes. At the (3)
minute mark, the Commission Secretary will announce that the speaker must conclude their
remarks.
3.Informational Agenda
3.1.Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
3.2.Discussion of Minor / Amending Plats approved by Staff:
Century Hill Development, Lots 1R, 2R, & 4R ~ Case #FPCO2020000011
West Park Addition, Block 6, Lots 11R2A, 12R2A & 12R3A ~ Case #FP2021000011
Sponsors:Alma Guerra, Jesse Dimeolo
3.3.Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard:
An Ordinance amendment regarding the Restricted Occupancy Overlay (ROO). The
Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on April 15, 2021 and voted (43) to
recommend approval of the ordinance. The City Council heard this item on April 19,
2021 and voted (52) to approve the request.
Page 1 of 20
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 2 May 6, 2021
3.4.Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
Thursday, May 13, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers with Virtual Option
~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison Osborne)
Thursday, May 20, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ 6:00 p.m.
Thursday, May 27, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers with Virtual Option
~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison Mirza)
Thursday, June 3, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ 6:00 p.m.
Monday, June 7, 2021 ~ P&Z Workshop ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
3.5.Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor
Board.
4.Consent Agenda
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be
enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found
compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved
with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items,
citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda
may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on
the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
4.1.Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Attachments:1.April 15 2021
5.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
6.Regular Agenda
6.1.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a waiver request to
Unified Development Section 8.3.H.2 ‘Platting and Replatting within Older Residential
Subdivisions’ and a presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat of Joe
Pasler's Partial Subdivision Lots 42RA and 42RB being a replat of Joe Pasler's Partial
Subdivision Lots 41 and 42 on approximately 0.3 acres located at 615 Pasler Street. Case
#FP2020000037
Sponsors:Rachel Lazo
Attachments:1.Staff Report
2.Vicinity Aerial and Small Area Maps
3.Waiver Request
4.Applicant Supporting Information
5.Final Plat
Page 2 of 20
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 3 May 6, 2021
6.2.Discussion and possible action regarding a return to inperson and/or hybrid Planning &
Zoning Commission meetings.
Sponsors:Michael Ostrowski
7.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent
meeting.
8.Adjourn
The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed
on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on April 30, 2021 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting
and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 7643541, TDD
at 18007352989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the
meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive
notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable
attempt to provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly
Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al
aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del SubCapitulo H, Capitulo
411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta
propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 3 of 20
April 15, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 6
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
April 15, 2021 6:00 p.m. Phone: *888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 913 6272 2824 Internet: https://zoom.us/s/91362722824
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Dennis Christiansen, Joe Guerra, Jeremy Osborne, Bobby Mirza, William Wright, Bill Mather, and Jason Cornelius
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Elizabeth Cunha and Linda Harvell CITY STAFF PRESENT: Michael Ostrowski, Carol Cotter, Erika Bridges, Alyssa Halle-Schramm, Amy Albright, Leslie Whitten, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
Chairman Christiansen called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
3. Informational Agenda
3.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
3.2 Discussion of Minor / Amending Plats approved by Staff.
• Phoenix Addition Phase One, Block 1, Lot 1R ~ Case #FPCO2021-000004
• Venable Estates, Block 1, Lot 1 ~ Case #FP2021-000003
There was no discussion.
3.3 Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard:
• A Rezoning for approximately five acres located at 3006 Norton Lane from R Rural to GS General Suburban. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on March 18, 2021 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on April 8, 2021 and voted (5-1) to approve the request.
There was general discussion.
3.4 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
Page 4 of 20
April 15, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 6
• Monday, April 19, 2021 ~ City Council Special Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ 4:00 p.m. (Liaison – Guerra)
• Thursday, April 22, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ Workshop 4:00 p.m. and Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison – Mather)
• Thursday, May 6, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, May 13, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ Workshop 4:00 p.m. and Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison – Osborne)
• Thursday, May 20, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ 6:00 p.m.
There was no discussion. 3.5 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board.
There was no discussion Consent Agenda 4.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
• April 1, 2021 Commissioner Osborne motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Guerra seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0). 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. There were no items removed. 6. Regular Agenda
6.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 1.10 “Transitional Provisions,” Section 3.3 “Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning),” Section 4.1 “Establishment of Districts,” and Section 5.11 “Single-family Overlay Districts” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, regarding the Restricted Occupancy Overlay (ROO). Case# ORDA2021000003. (Final action on this item is scheduled for the April 19, 2021 Special City Council Meeting subject
to change). Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm presented this item to the Commission,
recommending approval. Chairman Christiansen asked regarding concerns that this process may be illegal.
Assistant City Attorney Whitten clarified that the City Attorney’s Office does not believe Restricted Occupancy Overlay runs afoul of any laws. Chairman Christiansen asked if a more than two-occupant complaint has ever been taken to court.
Page 5 of 20
April 15, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 6
Assistant City Attorney Whitten stated that no cases have been taken to State Court in Texas,
however, it has gone to State Court in other states, and Federal Court. Commissioner Guerra asked regarding the original subdivision, the ordinance does not mention subdivision phases. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm stated that phases do not need to be mentioned in the ordinance as neighborhoods and subdivisions are usually platted in phases and each phase is considered an original plat. Commissioner Guerra referenced the district standards/accessory structure section in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) that states a property owner must live on the premises. Mr. Guerra
asked staff to reference this specific clause in the ROO language. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm explained that two ordinances work hand-in-
hand. Ms. Halle-Schramm also explained accessory living quarters are mentioned in the ROO language, and from staff implementation side, staff does know to look in both places.
Commissioner Guerra asked about the legacy clause and the 50% structure alteration code, and how they were determined. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm explained that the 50% structure alteration code comes from language located in UDO section 9.2 on nonconformities. Commissioner Mirza asked if the handbooks are ready. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm stated that they will be printed once the ordinance is adopted by City Council.
Commissioner Osborne asked about home renovations what is allowed, and what requires a permit. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm stated that old home restorations and extensive renovations beyond the thresholds in the Legacy Clause would need approval from the Zoning Board of Adjustments if located in a ROO overlay. Ms. Halle-Schramm further clarified that homes not in an overlay would only need a building permit.
Commissioner Osborne referenced UDO section 5.11.6.c, asking if a current rental property is housing four renters or a family when a ROO is imposed, then is rented to two tenants, when is the ability to rent to four removed. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm stated that if a home is grandfathered at four unrelated, they can continue their lease. Ms. Halle-Schramm further explained if a family of less than four moves in for more than three months, it is now at threshold and cannot go back up to four occupants. Commissioner Osborne asked who would monitor the occupant numbers.
Page 6 of 20
April 15, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 6
Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm stated that Code Enforcement will enforce the occupancy restrictions based on a complaint basis through the See Click Fix system.
Commissioner Osborne asked for clarification on the petition committee verbiage that states “may include residents of subject neighborhood, but not necessarily”. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm clarified that the petition committee can be comprised of non-residents. Ms. Halle-Schramm also clarified that the neighborhood must be involved, and staff does not see a problem because 50% +1 residents have to sign petition. Commissioner Osborne clarified that there is no time or age requirement of a neighborhood to be part of a ROO.
Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm confirmed that if 51% or more of the development is complete, a ROO can be requested.
Commissioner Wright asked if the 50% structural changes clause has any caveats regarding damages from natural disasters.
Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm stated that there is no specific language in UDO section 5.11, ROO, or non-conformities Chapter 9, but is city procedure that if a structure is damaged by a natural act, you would be able to reconstruct structure to the previous size or up to 10% by right and would not lose non-conforming status. Chairman Christiansen stated that staff and Commission have responses supporting and opposing the ordinance and asked how questions get processed. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm stated that a lot of emails and calls were answered and responded to by staff.
Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski clarified that if 50% or more of the structure that houses a nonconforming use due to ROO is renovated in the overlay district, it would need approval from the ZBA. If it was a conforming use, they would just need to pull a building permit. Chairman Christiansen opened the public hearing.
Jessica Williams, TAMU, College Station, spoke in opposition of the ROO citing concerns for affordable housing, traditional family attack/LGBTQ families, lower income families, definition of family, and oversight. Andrew Scottsboro, Dove Crossing, College Station, spoke in favor of the ROO, stating that it will help with “stealth dorms”, on-street parking, and college students. Keerthana Rameshbabu, TAMU, College Station, spoke in opposition of ROO citing concerns for college students, stress on renters, the ordinance being hard to enforce, and additional staff time.
Page 7 of 20
April 15, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 6
Donald Deere, Camelot Subdivision, College Station, spoke in opposition of the ROO citing concerns for no longer being able to rent to families and then to four unrelated, 50%+1 being
too low, and legacy provisions being very complex. Mr. Deere also stated that provisions for “ag shacks” do need to be put in place. Julie Schultz, Edelweiss Estates, College Station, spoke in opposition of the ROO, citing concerns for rezoning without consent, causing blight, taking rights away from citizens, and terrorizing students. Alexia Hernandez, Northgate, College Station, spoke in opposition of the ROO because of the effect on housing affordability stifling students. Patricia McDermott, Southside, College Station, spoke in favor of the ROO, stating that students
are are not here long enough to make a difference, and enforcement is needed. Donny Hall, College Hills, College Station, spoke in favor of the ROO, stating that the ordinance
supports balance, and reiterating that it is a lengthy process to get a ROO approved. Shirley Dupriest, College Park, College Station, spoke in favor of the Ordinance Amendment
stating that half of the population are not students and students can go anywhere. Ms. Dupriest also stated that this is an opportunity that City Council has recognized the town needs a few small places where families can live. Elianor Vessali, Oakwood, College Station, spoke in opposition of the ROO and expressed concerns with the wording, section 5.11.d.1.c.2, “committee MAY consist of members of the subdivision”. Carly Oldag, TAMU Student Senate, College Station, spoke in opposition of the ROO citing concerns for student housing, ordinance is not ethical or fair, it constricts student occupants, increases tension between students and non-student neighbors, tool of exclusion, question legality
and fairness to homeowners, and lack of enforceability. Chairman Christiansen closed the public hearing. Commissioner Cornelius asked for the number of no more than four cases Code Enforcement has enforced.
Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm stated that since 2017, there have been 111 See Click Fix complaints submitted, 39 investigations completed, and six summons requests. Commissioner Guerra clarified for listeners that the ROO will not take into effect as soon as ordinance is passed, and that this is simply a tool in the toolbox to be used by neighborhoods. Mr. Guerra also explained that this will only be applicable to single-family houses leaving a lot of availability for students to rent in single-family neighborhoods. Commissioner Mather expressed concerns that the ROO will cause very serious unintended consequences, pitting neighbor against neighbor, and including outside activist group.
Page 8 of 20
April 15, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 6
Commissioner Osborne expressed concerns for a rezoning free to the applicant that applies to someone else’s property, will not work. Mr. Osborne further stated that this ordinance is
unenforceable and renting to families will stop. Commissioner Wright reiterated that this ordinance is just a tool and should be an option whether it will work or not. Mr. Wright also stated that the ordinance should be given the opportunity to work. Commissioner Mirza stated that there needs to be a happy medium with neighborhood integrity and student integration. Chairman Christiansen stated that this is not a black and white issue. Mr. Christiansen expressed problems with the definition of family, and problems with enforcement. Mr. Christiansen further
clarified that there are other ways of making this happen, the way this will be applied this is not the solution to noise, parking, and parties, nothing happens until a subdivision comes forward. Commissioner Wright motioned to recommend approval of the Ordinance Amendment. Commissioner Guerra seconded the motion, motion passed (4-3) with Commissioners Osborne, Mather, and Cornelius voting in opposition. 6.2 Discussion and possible action regarding setting a date to discuss the Planning & Zoning Commission’s Plan of Work. Chairman Christiansen proposed an in-person meeting on a non-Planning & Zoning Commission night for a 6 p.m. retreat in Council Chambers. There was general discussion amongst the Commission, and a poll will be generated to gather date possibilities for the meeting. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire
about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion.
8. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 8:11 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Dennis Christiansen, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Page 9 of 20
Planning & Zoning Commission
May 6, 2021
Scale 2 residential lots on approximately 0.3 acres
Location 615 Pasler Street
Property Owner Jerry Wayne Watson
Applicant Jerry Wayne Watson
Project Manager Rachel Lazo, Senior Planner
rlazo@cstx.gov
Project Overview The subject property was part of the original Joe Pasler’s Partial
Subdivision Survey, which was platted in 1936. Since then, the property
has been used as a single building plot and has remained in common
ownership. This final plat reconfigures one residential building plot into
two residential lots and are required to meet the UDO standards for
Platting and Replatting in Older Residential Subdivisions. The average lot
width for this block is 61.10 feet. The applicant is requesting a lot width
of 50 feet for both Lots 42R-A and 42R-B, requiring a waiver of 11.10 feet
(18.17%) for each lot. The average lot area is required to be 8,500 square
feet, and the applicant is requesting a lot area of 5,656.9 square feet for
Lot 42R-A and 5,987.2 square feet for Lot 42R-B, requiring waivers of
2,843.1 square feet (33.5%) and 2,512.8 square feet (29.6%),
respectively.
Preliminary Plan Not Required
Public Infrastructure Not Required
Parkland Dedication Parkland dedication will be required for the one additional lot, which
totals to $1,261 and is required to be paid prior to filing of the plat.
Traffic Impact Analysis Not required
Compliant with Comprehensive Plan
(including Master Plans) and Unified
Development Ordinance
Yes
Compliant with Subdivision
Regulations
Yes with the exception of the waivers being requested for UDO Section
8.3.H.2 Platting and Replatting in Older Subdivisions
Staff Recommendation Approval
Supporting Materials
1.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2.Waiver request
3.Applicant Supporting Information
4.Final Plat
Final Plat
for
Joe Pasler’s Partial Subdivision Lots 42R-A & 42R-B
Being a replat of
Joe Pasler’s Partial Subdivision Lots 41 & 42
TRAKiT Project #FP2020-000037
Page 10 of 20
Page 11 of 20
Page 12 of 20
Page 13 of 20
SUBDIVISION WAVIER REQUEST
The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations
contained in the UDO except for the following waiver request:
UDO Section 8.3.H.2 Platting and Replatting in Older Residential Subdivisions – This
section requires that a plat in an older residential subdivision which does create an additional
lot must meet or exceed the average width of the lots along the street frontage for all of the lots
in the block including the subject lot and contain at least eight thousand five hundred (8,500)
square feet of space for each lot.
Specific Waivers Requested:
Lot Width Lot Area
Required Proposed Variance Required Proposed Variance
Lot
42R-A
61.10 ft.50 ft.11.10 ft.8,500
sq.ft.
5,656.9
sq.ft.
2,843.1
sq.ft.
Lot
42R-B
61.10 ft.50 ft.11.10 ft.8,500
sq.ft.
5,987.2
sq.ft.
2,512.8
sq.ft.
In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and
Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver:
1)That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such
that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of
the reasonable use of his land;
The subject property was originally platted as two lots, but has historically been used as
one, and is therefore considered one building plot. Ownership, improvements, and
miscellaneous factors were used to determine that this property is considered a building
plot.
The applicant is proposing to plat the property into two buildable lots for future homes
which is more dense than the original configuration, but contextually appropriate for the
area. The subject block is one tier deep, with eighteen building plots on the block. As
shown in the table below, 6 of the 18 lots (including the subject property) along Pasler St.
would currently meet or exceed the average lot width, while 12 lots are currently
substandard.
Legal Description Lot
Width
Lot Area
(sqft)
Subject Property
615 Pasler 100 12,305
617 Pasler 57 6,555
Page 14 of 20
619 Pasler 68 7,820
621 Pasler 75 8,625
713 Pasler 75 8,625
715 Pasler 75 8,625
801 Pasler 50 5,750
803 Pasler 50 5,750
805 Pasler 50 5,750
807 Pasler 50 5,750
809 Pasler 50 5,750
811 Pasler 41.78 5,009
815 Pasler 108 11,326
817 Pasler 50 5,750
No Address 50 5,750
823 Pasler 50 5,750
825 Pasler 50 5,750
827 Pasler 50 5,750
Total 1,099.78 126,390
Average 61.10 7,021.67
If the waiver is granted, the subdivision would legally subdivide one historically large lot and
create two individual lots, 42R-A and 42R-B. If platted into the proposed configuration, Lot
42R-A will be 5,656.9 square feet and 50 feet wide, and Lot 42R-B will be 5,987.2 square
feet and 50 feet wide, which fits within the surrounding context of the site, and closely
resemble the original plat filed in 1936.
2)That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant;
If the waiver is not granted, the building plot cannot be subdivided, and development on
the proposed additional lot may not occur.
3)The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering
this chapter; and
Granting this wavier would not be detrimental or injurious to other property. The granting
of the waiver would allow for two single-family detached homes on two lots in General
Page 15 of 20
Suburban zoning that otherwise meets the standards of the UDO.
4)That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this
chapter.
Granting the requested waiver will not affect the ability of surrounding tracts to meet the
ordinance when platting or replatting.
Summary of staff recommendations
Staff recommends approval of the waiver.
Page 16 of 20
Name of Project:JOE PASLER LOTS 41 & 42
Address:615 PASLER ST
Legal Description:PASLER, BLOCK 1, LOT 41 & 42
Applicant::
Property Owner:WATSON JERRY WAYNE
WATSON JERRY WAYNE
Total Acreage:0.28
Requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if
applicable):
N/A
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of
the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
N/A
Total No. of Lots:2
ROW Acreage:N/A
Existing Use:Residential
Floodplain Acreage:N/A
Special Flood Hazard Area?No - there is no Special Flood Hazard Area on the property
9
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning & Development Services Department
Final Plat Application
Supporting Information
Project No.:FP2020-000037
Page 1 of 2
Page 17 of 20
The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the
applicant.
N/A
The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to
other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
N/A
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
N/A
Requested Oversize Participation: N/A
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
N/A
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat, if applicable:
No. of acres to be dedicated:
No. of acres in detention:
N/ANo. of acres in floodplain:
N/A
N/A
No. of acres in greenways:N/A
Parkland Development Fee:N/A
Parks & Recreation Advisory Board approval date: N/A
Page 2 of 2
Page 18 of 20
DAVID WAYNE BOATCALLIELOT 3R, BLOCK 1VOL. 4089, PG. 93JERRY WATSONLOTS 41 & 42VOL. 2861, PG. 195ALIALA, LLCLOTS 40, 39 & 7' OF LOT 38VOL. 14770, PG. 86COLLEGE HILLS MISSIONARYBAPTIST CHURCHCALLED 0.4995 ACREVOL. 2861, PG. 19JOE PASLER'S PARTIALSUBDIVISIONVOL. 91, PG. 583PLATTEDCHURCHILL ESTATESLOTS 1R-3R, BLOCK 1VOL. 3267, PG. 45AMENDING PLATDAVID WAYNE BOATCALLIELOT 3R, BLOCK 1VOL. 4089, PG. 93ALIALA, LLCLOTS 40, 39 & 7' OF LOT 38VOL. 14770, PG. 86COLLEGE HILLS MISSIONARYBAPTIST CHURCHCALLED 0.4995 ACREVOL. 2861, PG. 19JOE PASLER'S PARTIALSUBDIVISIONVOL. 91, PG. 583PLATTEDCHURCHILL ESTATESLOTS 1R-3R, BLOCK 1VOL. 3267, PG. 45AMENDING PLAT····REPLATREPLATOFJOE PASLER'S PARTIAL SUBDIVISIONVICINITY MAPOWNED AND DEVELOPED BY:JERRY WATSON3826 HICKOK LNHOUSTON, TEXAS 77047(713) 884-5739BEING AFINAL PLATOFJOE PASLER'S PARTIAL SUBDIVISIONLOTS 42R-A & 42R-BLOTS 41 & 42ORIGINAL PLATCIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS1555 GREENS PRAIRIE ROAD WESTCOLLEGE STATION, TX 77845-(979)846-6212TEXAS FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBERSENG. F-2214 & SURVEYING 10042800Field notes of a 0.27 acre tract or parcel of land, lying and being situated in theRichard Carter Survey, Abstract No. 8, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, andbeing all of Lot 41 and Lot 42 of Joe Pasler's Partial Subdivision, according to the platrecorded in Volume 91, Page 583, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, andsaid Lots 41 and 42 being described in the deed from Charles Holland to Jerry Watson,as recorded in Volume 2861, Page 195, of the Official Records of Brazos County,Texas, and said 0.27 acre tract being more particularly described as follows:COMMENCING at the ½” iron rod found marking the west corner of thebeforementioned Lot 42 at the intersection of the apparent northeast right-of-way line ofPasler Street with the apparent southeast right-of-way line of Banks Street;THENCE N 41° 49' 40” E along the northwest line of Lot 42, same being thesoutheast line of Banks Street (right-of-way width varies), for a distance of 25.00 feet toa ½” iron rod and cap set at the PLACE OF BEGINNING of this description;THENCE N 41° 49' 40” E continuing along the common line between Lot 42 andBanks Street for a distance of 95.03 feet to a 5/8” iron rod found marking the northcorner of Lot 42, same being the west corner of Lot 3R - Churchill Estates, Block 1,according to the Amending Plat recorded in Volume 3267, Page 45, of the OfficialRecords of Brazos County, Texas;THENCE S 48° 10' 20” E along the northeast line of the beforementioned Lot 42and Lot 41, same being the southwest line of the beforementioned Lot 3R, partiallyadjacent to a fence, for a distance of 100.00 feet to a ½” iron rod and cap set at theeast corner of Lot 41, same being the north corner of Lot 40 - Pasler's PartialSubdivision, from which a wooden fence post corner bears S 26° 11' W - 1.1 feet and a5/8” iron rod found bears S 35° 45' 33” W - 1.93 feet;THENCE S 41° 49' 40” W along the southeast line of Lot 41, same being thenorthwest line of Lot 40 - Pasler's Partial Subdivision, partially adjacent to a fence, for adistance of 120.03 feet to the south corner of Lot 41, same being the west corner of Lot40, in the northeast line of Pasler Street, from which a ½” iron rod found bears S 46° 35'39” E - 0.37 feet and a ½” iron rod found bears N 46° 48' 17” W - 17.50 feet;THENCE N 48° 10' 20” W along the southwest line of the beforementioned Lot41 and Lot 42, same being the northeast line of Pasler Street (right-of-way widthvaries), for a distance of 75.00 feet to a ½” iron rod and cap set;THENCE N 03° 10' 20” W for a distance of 35.36 feet to the PLACE OFBEGINNING, containing 0.27 acre of land, more or less.Lots 42R-A & 42R-BJoe Pasler's Partial Subdivision0.27 AcreRichard Carter Survey, A-8College Station, Brazos County, TexasField notes of a 0.01 acre tract or parcel of land, lying and being situated in theRichard Carter Survey, Abstract No. 8, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, andbeing part of Lot 42 of Joe Pasler's Partial Subdivision, according to the plat recorded inVolume 91, Page 583, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and said Lot 42being described in the deed from Charles Holland to Jerry Watson, as recorded inVolume 2861, Page 195, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and said 0.01acre tract being more particularly described as follows:BEGINNING at the ½” iron rod found marking the west corner of thebeforementioned Lot 42 at the intersection of the apparent northeast right-of-way line ofPasler Street with the apparent southeast right-of-way line of Banks Street;THENCE N 41° 49' 40” E along the common line between the beforementionedLot 42 and Banks Street for a distance of 25.00 feet to a ½” iron rod and cap set;THENCE S 03° 10' 20” E across the beforementioned Lot 42 and along aproposed chamfer line for a distance of 35.36 feet to a ½” iron rod and cap set at thecommon line between Lot 42 and Pasler Street;THENCE N 48° 10' 20” W along the common line between the beforementionedLot 42 and Pasler Street, for a distance of 25.00 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNINGcontaining 0.01 acre of land more or less.Right-of-way DedicationJoe Pasler's Partial Subdivision0.01 AcreRichard Carter Survey, A-8College Station, Brazos County, TexasLEGEND
Page 19 of 20
DAVID WAYNE BOATCALLIELOT 3R, BLOCK 1VOL. 4089, PG. 93JERRY WATSONLOTS 41 & 42VOL. 2861, PG. 195ALIALA, LLCLOTS 40, 39 & 7' OF LOT 38VOL. 14770, PG. 86COLLEGE HILLS MISSIONARYBAPTIST CHURCHCALLED 0.4995 ACREVOL. 2861, PG. 19JOE PASLER'S PARTIALSUBDIVISIONVOL. 91, PG. 583PLATTEDCHURCHILL ESTATESLOTS 1R-3R, BLOCK 1VOL. 3267, PG. 45AMENDING PLATCIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS1555 GREENS PRAIRIE ROAD WESTCOLLEGE STATION, TX 77845-(979)846-6212TEXAS FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBERSENG. F-2214 & SURVEYING 10042800LEGEND
Page 20 of 20