Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/09/2020 - Workshop Agenda Packet - City CouncilCollege Station, TX Meeting Agenda City Council Workshop Meeting 1101 Texas Ave, College Station, TX 77840 January 9, 2020 4:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers College Station, TX Page 1 1.Call meeting to order. 2.Executive  Session  is  closed  to  the  public  and  will  be  held  in  the  Administrative Conference Room. The open meeting will resume no earlier than 5:00 pm.  Consultation with Attorney {Gov’t Code Section 551.071};  Possible  action.  The  City  Council  may  seek  advice  from  its  attorney  regarding  a  pending  or  contemplated litigation subject or settlement offer or attorney­client privileged information. Litigation  is an ongoing process and questions may arise as to a litigation tactic or settlement offer, which  needs to be discussed with the City Council. Upon occasion the City Council may need information  from its attorney as to the status of a pending or contemplated litigation subject or settlement offer or  attorney­client  privileged  information.  After  executive  session  discussion,  any  final  action  or  vote  taken will be in public. The following subject(s) may be discussed.  Litigation  a. Kathryn A. Stever­Harper as Executrix for the Estate of John Wesley Harper v. City of College Station  and  Judy  Meeks;  No.  15,977­PC  in  the  County  Court  No.  1,  Brazos  County,  Texas b. McCrory Investments II, LLC d/b/a Southwest Stor Mor v. City of College Station; Cause No. 17­ 000914­CV­361;  In  the  361st  District  Court,  Brazos  County,  Texas c. City of College Station v. Gerry Saum, Individually, and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Susan  M.  Wood,  Deceased;  Cause  No.  17­002742­CV­361;  In  the  361st  District  Court,  Brazos County, Texas d. Carrie McIver v. City of College Station; Cause No. 18­003271­CV­85; In the 85th District Court, Brazos County, Texas  Personnel {Gov’t Code Section 551.074};  Possible  action.  The  City  Council  may  deliberate  the  appointment,  employment,  evaluation,  reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer. After executive session discussion,  any final action or vote taken will be in public. The following public officer(s) may be discussed:  a.Construction Board of Adjustments b. Design Review Board c. Parks and Recreation Board d. Planning and Zoning Commission e. Zoning Board of Adjustments f. Self­Evaluation g. City Secretary h. City Manager Page 1 of 23 City Council City Council Workshop Meeting Page 2 January 9, 2020 3.Reconvene from Executive Session and take action, if any. 4.Presentation, discussion, and possible action on items listed on the consent agenda. 5.Workshop Agenda Speaker Protocol: An individual who wishes to address the City Council regarding any item on the  Workshop Agenda other than those items posted for Executive Session shall register with the City  Secretary prior to the meeting being called to order. Registration forms are available in the Office of  the City Secretary. Upon stepping to the podium the speaker must state their name and city of  residence,  including  the  state  of  residence  if  the  city  is  located  out  of  state.  Speakers  are  encouraged  to  identify  their  College  Station  neighborhood  or  geographic  location.  An  individual  speaking on a Consent Agenda item on the Workshop agenda may not speak on that item at the  Regular Meeting on the same day. Each speaker’s remarks are limited to three (3) minutes. An  individual speaking on multiple Consent Agenda items must speak on all items when the speaker is  called to the podium. An individual speaking on multiple Consent Agenda items will have three (3)  minutes to speak on the first item and one (1) additional minute to speak per each additional item  regardless of the number of items they wish to address. Any speaker addressing the Council through  the use of a translator may speak for six (6) minutes and in the case of Consent Agenda items an  additional two (2) minutes per item. An individual may speak for ten (10) minutes on behalf of a  group of five (5) or more. The five (5) or more individuals must sign the registration form and must be  present when the speaker is introduced. Those signing may not speak individually. A speaker who  wishes  to  include  computer­based  information  while  addressing  the  Council  must  provide  the  electronic  file  to  the  City  Secretary  by  noon  on  the  day  of  the  Council  meeting.  During  each  speaker’s  remarks  a  timer  light  will  change  from  green  to  yellow  when  there  is  thirty  seconds  remaining. The speaker must conclude their remarks when the timer light changes from yellow to  red.  5.1. Presentation,  discussion,  and  possible  action  regarding  a  report  from  Experience  Bryan  College Station addressing FY19 accomplishments and strategies to increase tourism in the  region. Sponsors: Jeff Kersten Attachments: None 5.2.Presentation, discussion, and possible action on regulating the use of wireless communication  devices. Sponsors:Brandy Norris Attachments:1.2017 College Station Ordinance Survey 2.2019 WCD Update ­ College Station Survey 6.Council Calendar ­ Council may discuss upcoming events. Page 2 of 23 City Council City Council Workshop Meeting Page 3 January 9, 2020 7.Discussion, review, and possible action regarding the following meetings: Animal  Shelter  Board,  Arts  Council  of  Brazos  Valley,  Architectural  Advisory  Committee,  Audit  Committee, Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board, Bio­Corridor Board of Adjustments,  Brazos  County  Health  Dept.,  Brazos  Valley  Council  of  Governments,  Brazos  Valley  Economic  Development  Corporation,  Bryan/College  Station  Chamber  of  Commerce,  Budget  and  Finance  Committee,  BVSWMA,  BVWACS,  Compensation  and  Benefits  Committee,  Comprehensive  Plan  Evaluation  Committee,  Experience  Bryan­College  Station,  Design  Review  Board,  Economic  Development Committee, Gulf Coast Strategic Highway Coalition, Historic Preservation Committee,  Interfaith  Dialogue  Association,  Intergovernmental  Committee,  Joint  Relief  Funding  Review  Committee, Landmark Commission, Library Board, Metropolitan Planning Organization, Parks and  Recreation  Board,  Planning  and  Zoning  Commission,  Research  Valley  Technology  Council,  Regional Transportation Committee for Council of Governments, Sister Cities Association, Spring  Creek  Local  Government  Corporation,  Transportation  and  Mobility  Committee,  TAMU  Student  Senate,  Texas  Municipal  League,  Walk  with  the  Mayor,  YMCA,  Zoning  Board  of  Adjustments,  (Notice of Agendas posted on City Hall bulletin board.)  8.Adjourn. The City council may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on the the agenda if a  matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.  I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station,  Texas, on January 3, 2020 at 5:00 p.m.  City Secretary This  building  is  wheelchair  accessible.  Persons  with  disabilities  who  plan  to  attend  this meeting    and    who    may    need    accommodations,    auxiliary    aids,    or    services    such    as interpreters,   readers,  or  large  print  are  asked  to  contact  the  City  Secretary’s  Office  at  (979) 764­3541,  TDD   at  1­800­735­2989,  or  email  adaassistance@cstx.gov  at  least  two  business days  prior  to  the   meeting   so   that   appropriate   arrangements   can   be   made.   If   the   City   does  not   receive   notification  at  least  two  business  days  prior  to  the  meeting,  the  City  will  make  a reasonable  attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant  to  Section  30.07,  Penal  Code  (Trespass  by  License  Holder  with  an  Openly  Carried     Handgun)     A     Person     Licensed     under     Subchapter     H,     Chapter     411,  Government   Code   (Handgun   Licensing   Law),   may   not   enter   this   Property   with   a  Handgun that is Carried Openly."Codigo  Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme  a  la  Seccion  30.07 del  codigo  penal  (traspasar  portando  armas  de  mano al    aire   libre   con   licencia),   personas   con   licencia   bajo   del   Sub­Capitulo   H,   Capitulo  Page 3 of 23 City Council  City Council Workshop Meeting Page 4 January 9, 2020 411,  Codigo  de  Gobierno  (Ley  de  licencias  de  arma  de  mano),  no  deben  entrar  a  esta  propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 4 of 23 January 9, 2020 Item No. 5.1. Experience Bryan College Station Presentation Sponsor:Jeff Kersten, Assistant City Manager Reviewed By CBC:City Council Agenda Caption:Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a report from Experience Bryan College Station addressing FY19 accomplishments and strategies to increase tourism in the region. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Financial Sustainability Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends Council receive presentation and provide direction as desired. Summary: The Council has requested information related to utilizing Hotel Occupancy Tax revenues to address occupancy rates in College Station hotels. Kindra Fry, President/CEO of Experience BCS, will provide a summary of 2019 activities and include a look into plans for 2020. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Reviewed & Approved by Legal: No Attachments: None Page 5 of 23 January 9, 2020 Item No. 5.2. Hands Free Ordinance Sponsor:Brandy Norris, Assistant Chief of Police Reviewed By CBC:City Council Agenda Caption:Presentation, discussion, and possible action on regulating the use of wireless communication devices. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Good Governance Improving Mobility Recommendation(s): Staff recommends Council receive the presentation and provide direction as desired. Summary: Driver inattention while using wireless communication devices is a public safety concern. The State Legislature has passed a State law regarding the use of these devices while driving, but it allows for drivers to change their music, use their GPS or send or receive emergency messages. City ordinance cannot preempt state law, but an ordinance can be implemented that require hands free use to talk on devices. Budget & Financial Summary: Depending on direction, $29,400 - $84,000 Reviewed & Approved by Legal: No Attachments: 1.2017 College Station Ordinance Survey 2.2019 WCD Update - College Station Survey Page 6 of 23 Prepared by Katie N. Womack Neal A. Johnson Center for Transportation Safety February 2017 Survey of Wireless Communication Device Use in College Station, Texas Report Number Goes Here A Member of The Texas A&M University System Research. Service. Results. Page 7 of 23 SURVEY OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE USE IN COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS BACKGROUND An observational survey of wireless communication device (WCD) use was conducted by staff of the Center for Transportation Safety, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, after passage of a College Station city ordinance banning the use of hand held WCD’s while driving a vehicle or bicycle. The objective of the survey was to measure differences in actual observed WCD device use while operating a vehicle in the city of College Station from before the ordinance effective date to after. The ordinance was passed on August 11, 2016 and became effective on November 9, 2016. The pre-ordinance surveys were completed in early September 2016 and the post ordinance surveys in late November and early December 2016. THE ORDINANCE The ordinance states that use of a WCD (such as a mobile phone, tablet, GPS device, etc.) while driving a motor vehicle or bicycle is a violation of the city’s traffic code. There are exceptions for hands-free devices such as use of a speakerphone, or Bluetooth device, or any other piece of equipment that the operator can access without using either of their hands. Other exceptions include: using a hand-held device while at a complete stop, using a navigation device that is affixed to the vehicle, and those using the device for emergency services such as reporting a crime, traffic incident or medical emergency. This ordinance does not apply to operators licensed by the Federal Communication Commission to operate a radio frequency device, and authorized emergency personnel acting in an official capacity. In terms of enforcement of the ordinance, a police officer’s visual observation of a vehicle operator holding a WCD creates a presumption that that person did violate the ordinance. (Full text of the ordinance is provided as Appendix A.) ENFORCEMENT The city of College Station and the College Station Police Department began publicizing the ordinance immediately upon its passage. The Eagle, a local community newspaper, published an article on the new ordinance on August 12th, the day after it was passed (Clark, 2016). Reporters talked to the College Station Police Department (CSPD) to get clarification on the ordinance and how it would be enforced. The CSPD informed the public that once the ordinance became effective on November 9th, 2016, warnings would initially be given. The objective, according to CSPD, was voluntary compliance but their spokesperson also emphasized that having a consequence attached to the use of these devices might make people recognize the dangers of using these devices while driving. The initial grace period for issuance of warning citations was left open and CSPD said that no public announcement would be made when this period would be ending (Kamenicky, 2016). Local news station KBTX also covered the new ordinance extensively, including interviews with CSPD, community groups that supported the ordinance, and local residents. The city of College Station also used social media to Page 8 of 23 disseminate information via Twitter and Facebook starting the day the ordinance was passed. The 12th Man Foundation (2016) also sent out information and retweeted information from the city of College Station (2016) on Twitter to inform people of the new ordinance who would be coming to College Station for home football games at Kyle Field on the Texas A&M University campus. As of November 16th, one week after the ordinance took effect, 29 warnings had been issued by CSPD (Falls, 2016). Police Chief Scott McCollum said he had already seen a decrease in distracted driving one week in and continued to emphasize their goal of voluntary compliance by the driving public. In an Eagle article on January 1st, 2017 the City of College Station said they had seen a great deal of “self-policing” with people changing their behavior to conform to the new ordinance (Fiedler, 2017). As of January 1st the number of warnings given was 140. Of these 140 warnings, 65% of the drivers were not from College Station or neighboring Bryan. While it is unclear exactly when CSPD started issuing citations, on March 8th, 2017 the City of College Station sent out a message via Twitter saying that 241 warnings and 66 citations had been issued under the ordinance (2017). SURVEY DESIGN The TTI survey was a curbside traffic observation survey, which included observation of talking, manipulating (texting or touching), reading and holding any type of WCD. Observations were conducted in College Station and the neighboring city of Bryan, which does not have a WCD use ordinance, for use as a comparison city. For site selection each city was mapped into 12 section grids, and a survey location was selected at relatively high volume intersections in each of the 12 sections. Each site had two observation points – one for stopped traffic at the intersection and one for moving traffic approaching or after departure from the intersection, because the ordinance specifically excludes vehicles that are at a complete stop. Additionally, because of the exclusion for WCD’s affixed to the vehicle, surveyors also noted the presence of a device affixed to the vehicle and use of the affixed device by the driver. This allowed TTI to measure differences in behavior between stopped and moving vehicle operators and changes in the number of affixed devices from pre to post-ordinance. The sample size was 200 passenger vehicles covered by the ordinance per site, 100 moving and 100 stopped. Motorcycle and bicycle WCD uses were also recorded; however, TTI conducted a separate survey of bicycle wireless communication device use targeted at heavily traveled bike routes with bike lanes. The data collection protocol is provided as Appendix B. Observations of driver demographics (estimated age and gender) and vehicle characteristics (passenger vehicle or motorcycle) were noted for those engaged in WCD use as well as the type of device use (talking or texting). Drivers estimated to be 18 years or older were included in the survey, as subjectively estimated by observers following a protocol and trained to estimate age. Drivers under the age of 18 are governed by Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) laws that restrict them from using any wireless communication device (including hands-free) until they reach the age Page 9 of 23 of 18. The age categories represent three driver groups of young adults (those under the age of 25), adults, and seniors (those 65 and over). Vehicles in which no device use was observed were counted using hand-held traffic counters. No demographic data (gender or age category) was recorded for non-users. PRE-ORDINANCE WCD USE Of the 2400 passenger vehicles observed in the city of College Station, 280 drivers (11.7%) were engaged in WCD use while driving. Specifically, 7.1% were texting on a cell phone, 4.4% were talking, and .2% (or 5 drivers) were doing both. Note that these percentages strictly reflect observations of drivers in the act of using a WCD. The ordinance includes ‘holding’ a WCD as a citable offense. When drivers ‘holding’ a WCD were added to the analysis, the number of ‘users’ rose to 350, or 14.6% of all drivers observed. Use rates differed for stopped vehicle drivers and moving vehicle drivers. In the 1201 moving vehicles, 100 drivers, or 8.3% of the total were observed using a WCD. An additional 180 drivers, or 15.0% using WCDs were at a complete stop at an intersection. Observers also noted during the pre-ordinance phase that 54 vehicles had a WCD affixed to the vehicle (i.e., on the dashboard, door frame, etc.). Only one of the 54 was in use by the driver. POST-ORDINANCE WCD USE Several weeks after the change to the College Station traffic code, a replicate survey was conducted. In the post-ordinance survey, of the 2400 passenger vehicles observed, 162 drivers (6.8%) were engaged in WCD use while driving, a difference of 4.9 percentage points from pre- ordinance use, effectively a 41.9% decrease in use. Post-ordinance cell phone use for talking was 1.7%, for texting was 5.0%, and none were engaged in both behaviors. Figure 1 shows WCD use by type in College Station pre- and post-ordinance enforcement. Figure 2 shows WCD use if “holding” a device is included in the count, which would be citable post-ordinance. The percentage of WCD users observed in moving vehicles was half that observed in the before period, dropping from 8.3% to 4.1%. Stopped vehicle driver WCD use was 9.4% post- ordinance, a 37.3% decrease from 15.0% pre-ordinance (Figure 3). The number of affixed devices in the post period rose to 76 in the 2400 vehicles observed. None, however, were being used when observed. Page 10 of 23 Figure 1. Pre- and Post-Ordinance College Station WCD Use Figure 2. Pre- and Post-Ordinance College Station WCD Use Including Presumption of Use by Holding Device Page 11 of 23 Figure 3. Pre- and Post-Ordinance College Station WCD Use – Moving Versus Stopped Vehicle Drivers COMPARISON CITY ANALYSIS The city of Bryan, without a hands-free ordinance was used as a comparison city and surveyed during the same timeframe using the same survey design. Pre and post WCD use (moving and stopped combined) in Bryan compared to pre and post use in College Station is shown in Table 1 and Figure 4. Table 1. College Station/Bryan Comparison of WCD Use Pre and Post-Ordinance Usage by Type College Station Total Vehicle N=2400 Bryan Total Vehicle N=2400 Pre Post Pre Post n % n % n % n % Talking 106 4.42% 41 1.71% 104 4.33% 76 3.17% Texting 169 7.04% 121 5.04% 159 6.63% 151 6.29% Both 5 0.21% 0 0.00% 4 0.17% 3 0.13% Total 280 11.67% 162 6.75% 267 11.13% 230 9.58% Page 12 of 23 Figure 4. Pre- and Post-Ordinance WCD Use – College Station and Bryan The decrease in WCD use in College Station is statistically significant (z=5.88, p<.001); however, the decrease in WCD use in Bryan from 11.1% to 9.6% (a 13.5% decrease) during the same time frame is not a statistically significant decrease. The analysis of moving versus stopped vehicles revealed that both conditions were impacted by the ordinance to a greater degree in College Station than in Bryan. The difference in moving and stopped vehicle drivers’ WCD use pre-ordinance was not statistically significant between the two cities (see Figures 5 and 6). However, after the ordinance went into effect, the percent of drivers in stopped vehicles using WCD’s in Bryan was significantly different from College Station (z=-3.23, p<.01). The site level data in Bryan showed that at four sites the WCD use rate actually increased. The moving rate increased at four sites and the stopped rate increased at three sites. Figures 5 & 6. Pre- and Post-Ordinance WCD Use – College Station and Bryan Page 13 of 23 Observers also noted in Bryan during the pre-ordinance phase that 79 vehicles had a WCD affixed to the vehic le. Three of the 79 devices were in use by the driver. The number of affixed devices in the post period observed in Bryan was 82 in the 2400 vehicles observed, and none were being used when observed. SUMMARY TTI surveys found a 41.9% decrease in observed WCD use in College Station after implementation of the hands-free only cell phone ordinance. In the comparison city of Bryan, WCD use decreased by 14.3% during the same timeframe. The largest percentage decreases were observed in moving vehicles in College Station. The decrease in percentage of WCD users talking was greater than the decrease for texting. The number of devices affixed to the vehicle increased in both College Station and Bryan from pre to post-ordinance with much larger increases in College Station, the city affected by the new ordinance. Page 14 of 23 REFERENCES 12th Man Foundation. [12thManFndtn]. (2016, November 12). Coming to Aggieland today? Don't forget that the new law prohibiting cell phone use while driving is in effect. Retrieved from: https://twitter.com/12thManFndtn/status/797484980712640516 City of College Station. [CityofCS]. (2016, November 12). Cell phone use must be hands-free while driving or cycling in College Station. Retrieved from: https://twitter.com/CityofCS/status/797484117042434050 City of College Station. [CityofCS]. (2017, March 8). Since the hands-free ordinance was adopted, we’ve issued 241 warnings & 66 citations. Retrieved from: https://twitter.com/CityofCS/status/839600324759310336 Clark, C., (2016, August 12). College Station City Council Oks ban on hand-held phone use while driving. The Eagle. Retrieved from: http://www.theeagle.com/news/local/college- station-city-council-oks-ban-on-hand-held-phone/article_e4894d87-d8d1-591f-9f15- 24420e1e4621.html Falls, C., (2016, November 16). College Station Police writing warnings for new hands-free cell phone law. KBTX-TV. Retrieved from: http://www.kbtx.com/content/news/College- Station-Police-writing-warnings-for-new-hands-free-cell-phone-law-401545755.html Fiedler, R., (2017, January 1). 140 warned under College Station hands-free cellphone law. The Eagle. Retrieved from: http://www.theeagle.com/news/local/warned-under-college- station-hands-free-cellphone-law/article_8e044a5d-aa03-511a-afd6- 24ad5d5561ce.html Kamenicky, E., (2016, November 6). College Station’s hands-free device ordinance in effect Wednesday. The Eagle. Retrieved from: http://www.theeagle.com/news/local/college- station-s-hands-free-device-ordinance-in-effect-wednesday/article_60f0138b-fa93- 5567-93ee-d687d168edac.html Page 15 of 23 APPENDIX A ORDINANCE NO. 2016-3797 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, “TRAFFIC CODE” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY ADDING SECTION 10-14 “USE OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES WHILE OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE OR BICYCLE”, PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Chapter 10, “Traffic Code”, be amended by adding Section 10-14 “Use of Wireless Communication Devices While Operating a Motor Vehicle or Bicycle”, as set out in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That if any provisions of any section of this ordinance shall be held to be void or unconstitutional, such holding shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining provisions or sections of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. PART 3: That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) nor more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00). Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. Said Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by Section 35 of the Charter of the City of College Station. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this 11th day of August, 2016. APPROVED: ____________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Secretary APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney Page 16 of 23 Ordinance No. 2016-3797 Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT “A” That Chapter 10, “Traffic Code”, is hereby amended by adding Section 10-14 “Use of Wireless Communication Devices While Operating a Motor Vehicle or Bicycle”, and is to read as follows: Section 10-14 Use of Wireless Communication Devices While Operating a Motor Vehicle or Bicycle A. Definitions. 1. Authorized Emergency Personnel means a person who is a law enforcement officer, firefighter, member of a governmental emergency medical services, communications or public utility function, or member of a governmental emergency management function. 2. Hands-free Device means speakerphone capability or a telephone attachment or other piece of equipment, regardless of whether permanently installed in the motor vehicle allowing use of the Wireless Communication Device without use of either of the operator's hands. 3. Use means employing, accessing or operating the Wireless Communication Device for any reason. 4. Wireless Communication Device has the meaning assigned in Texas Transportation Code § 545.425, as amended. B. Violation. An operator of a motor vehicle or a bicycle may not use a Wireless Communication Device while operating a motor vehicle or bicycle on a public roadway or highway. C. Affirmative Defenses. It is an affirmative defense to prosecution to an offense under this section if: 1. Complete Stop. The motor vehicle or bicycle is at a complete stop. 2. Hands-free Device. The Wireless Communication Device is used in Hands-free Device mode of operation to engage in telephone communication or to listen to audio transmissions. Page 17 of 23 3. Navigation. The Wireless Communication Device is used as global positioning or navigation device or for its global positioning or navigation operating software and the Wireless Communication Device is affixed to the motor vehicle or bicycle. Ordinance No. 2016-3797 Page 3 of 3 4. Emergency Services. The Wireless Communication Device is used for obtaining emergency assistance to report a crime, traffic accident, medical emergency, serious traffic hazard or in prevention of a crime. D. Presumption. Evidence that a police officer observed a person holding a Wireless Communication Device while operating a motor vehicle or bicycle in motion creates a rebuttable presumption that the person used a Wireless Communication Device in violation of this section. E. Conflicts. To the extent this section conflicts with any provision of the Texas Transportation Code regarding the use of wireless communication devices or hand-held mobile telephones, this section does not apply. F. Non-Applicability. This section does not apply to: a. A person licensed by the Federal Communication Commission while operating a radio frequency device other than a Wireless Communication Device. b. Authorized Emergency Personnel while acting in official capacity. Page 18 of 23 APPENDIX B Data Collection Protocol for College Station, Texas “Use of Wireless Communication Devices While Operating a Motor Vehicle or Bicycle” Survey Background The Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) will conduct an observational survey of “Use of Wireless Communication Devices (WCD) While Operating a Motor Vehicle or Bicycle” in College Station and Bryan, Texas. The survey elements will be included per the ordinance Chapter 10, “Traffic Code” of the code of ordinances of the city of College Station, Texas amended section 10-14 “Use of Wireless Communication Devices While Operating a Motor Vehicle or Bicycle”. The survey is designed to provide a comparison of pre-ordinance WCD with WCD use following enactment of the city ordinance banning use effective November 9, 2016. Sites in Bryan are included in the survey design for a controlled comparison. Definitions That Chapter 10, “Traffic Code”, is hereby amended by adding Section 10-14 “Use of Wireless Communication Devices While Operating a Motor Vehicle or Bicycle”, and is to read as follows: Section 10-14 Use of Wireless Communication Devices While Operating a Motor Vehicle or Bicycle A. Definitions. 1. Authorized Emergency Personnel means a person who is a law enforcement officer, firefighter, member of a governmental emergency medical services, communications or public utility function, or member of a governmental emergency management function. 2. Hands-free Device means speakerphone capability or a telephone attachment or other piece of equipment, regardless of whether permanently installed in the motor vehicle allowing use of the Wireless Communication Device without use of either of the operator's hands. 3. Use means employing, accessing or operating the Wireless Communication Device for any reason. 4. Wireless Communication Device has the meaning assigned in Texas Transportation Code § 545.425, as amended. B. Violation. An operator of a motor vehicle or a bicycle may not use a Wireless Communication Device while operating a motor vehicle or bicycle on a public roadway or highway. Page 19 of 23 C. Affirmative Defenses. It is an affirmative defense to prosecution to an offense under this section if: 1. Complete Stop. The motor vehicle or bicycle is at a complete stop. 2. Hands-free Device. The Wireless Communication Device is used in Hands-free Device mode of operation to engage in telephone communication or to listen to audio transmissions. 3. Navigation. The Wireless Communication Device is used as global positioning or navigation device or for its global positioning or navigation operating software and the Wireless Communication Device is affixed to the motor vehicle or bicycle. 4. Emergency Services. The Wireless Communication Device is used for obtaining emergency assistance to report a crime, traffic accident, medical emergency, serious traffic hazard or in prevention of a crime. D. Presumption. Evidence that a police officer observed a person holding a Wireless Communication Device while operating a motor vehicle or bicycle in motion creates a rebuttable presumption that the person used a Wireless Communication Device in violation of this section. E. Conflicts. To the extent this section conflicts with any provision of the Texas Transportation Code regarding the use of wireless communication devices or hand-held mobile telephones, this section does not apply. F. Non-Applicability. This section does not apply to: a. A person licensed by the Federal Communication Commission while operating a radio frequency device other than a Wireless Communication Device. b. Authorized Emergency Personnel while acting in official capacity. Data To Be Collected “Use of Wireless Communication Devices While Operating a Motor Vehicle or Bicycle” will be recorded for drivers only. All motor vehicles will be included, with the exception outlined in Chapter 10 “Traffic Code” Section 10-14. Include all passenger vehicles except emergency response vehicles (governmental and nongovernmental), military vehicles, vehicles operated by a person under 18 years of age, and vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 26,001pounds. Examples of emergency response vehicles include but not limited to law enforcement, fire response public or private volunteer, medical service or ambulances, municipal department or utility, tow trucks, and vehicles with emergency response lights, flashers, or placards. Survey data will include: 1. Driver’s estimated age (young adults 18-24, adult 25-64, senior 65+) 2. Driver’s gender (male or female) 3. Vehicle type (limited to passenger vehicle, motorcycle, and bicycle) 4. Wireless Device Use (talking, texting, or holding) Page 20 of 23 a. Talking- Driver observed holding WD to their ear or speaking into WCD b. Texting- Driver observed looking at, reading, typing, or scrolling WCD c. Holding- Driver observed holding a WD, but not observed talking or texting Collect data for 100 vehicles, plus all motorcycles, and bicycles observed at each site. This survey requires two surveyors per site. One surveyor will be at an intersection observing and collecting data for stopped vehicles only. A maximum of ten (10) vehicles will be collected per light cycle. The second surveyor will be either upstream or downstream of the surveyor collecting stopped traffic data. The second surveyor will be observing and documenting moving traffic only, no stopped vehicles will be documented. Instructions for Recording Written Data Complete site information at the top of the data sheet. Observer- Name of observer and scribe if needed Date - include month, day and year Site - include site number and intersection streets or mid-block street City - city of observation Dir. Of Obs. - direction of traffic observed (north, south, east, west) Loc. Type - the type of location observed (intersection with light or sign, or mid-block) Weather - type of weather during observation period Notes – any unique site characteristics, lane of traffic observed if not closest lane Start Time – Time when observation begins End Time – Time when observation finishes Use the traffic counter to count vehicles in your lane of observation not engaged with a wireless communication device. Use four buttons on the counter: button one for vehicles, button two for motorcycles, button three for bicycles, and button four for not sure’s. Documenting drivers engaged with a wireless communication device (WCD): DRIVER columns: Document M for male, F for female, or ? for unsure for the driver’s gender in the appropriate column for estimated age of driver (young adults 18-24, adult 25-64, senior 65+). Vehicle Type column: Document C for car/passenger vehicle, M for motorcycle, or B for bicycle. Default in this column will be C. WIRELESS DEVICE USE columns: Place a check in the appropriate column for type of WCD use. a. Talking- Driver observed holding WD to their ear or speaking into WCD b. Texting- Driver observed looking at, reading, typing, or scrolling WCD c. Holding- Driver observed holding a WD, but not observed talking or texting Enter the number of passenger vehicles, motorcycles, and bicycles observed from counter in the appropriate box. Page 21 of 23 The total number of passenger vehicles (counter and documented) observed should equal 100 (the sample size). Motorcycles and bicycles are not included in sample size. Observation Procedure Observers must follow a schedule that indicates the day, start time, intersection or mid-block street name, site number, and direction of travel for observations. Survey every vehicle in the nearest thru lane to the curb where you are standing, or observe a constant ratio of vehicles in the curb lane if volume is too heavy to observe every vehicle. If you do not see the driver clearly enough to determine WCD use, count the vehicle with the corresponding counter button. Focus on the hands and mouth of the driver. If you do not see an act of WCD usage, the observation is a vehicle with non-use. If you cannot see the driver, the vehicle should be counted with the Not Sure button. Document each driver WCD use observed on the data collect sheet as described in the Instructions for Recording Written Data section. If, for any reason, you are unable to comply with the schedule or you have any questions, you should notify the project director (Katie Womack) at TTI immediately. Page 22 of 23 College Station/Bryan Driver Cell Phone Use Survey– 2019 Follow-up Figure 1. College Station Cell Phone Use Page 23 of 23