HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/27/2018 - Regular Minutes - City Council - Audit CommitteeMayor
Karl Mooney
Mayor Pro Tem
Linda Harvell
City Manager
Bryan Woods
(r
9;
CITY OF COI ,LI GI STATION
Home of Texas Ae'rM University"
Minutes
CITY COUNCIL AUDIT COMMITTEE
Tuesday, November 27, 2018 at 3:00 PM
City Hall Administrative Conference Room
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77840
Audit Committee Members Present:
Karl Mooney, Mayor
James Benham, Mayor Pro Tem — Not in Attendance
Linda Harvell, Councilmember
Mike Ashfield, Committee Member
Nathan Sharp, Committee Member — Not in attendance
City Staff:
Ty Elliott, Internal Auditor
Madison Rorschach, Assistant Internal Auditor
Jeffrey Capps, Interim City Manager
Jeff Kersten, Assistant City Manager
Aubrey Nettles, Special Projects Manager
Carla Robinson, City Attorney
Yvette Dela Torre, Deputy Local Registrar
Mary E. Leonard, Finance Director
Pete Caler, Assistant Director PW/Operations
Wally Urrutia, Division Manager — Solid Waste
Heather Woolwine — Recycling & Environmental Compliance Manager
Council Members
Jerome Rektorik
Bob Brick
John Nichols
Elianor Vessali
Dennis Maloney
Regular Agenda Item No. 1— Call to Order and Announce a Ouorum is Present.
With a quorum present, the Audit Committee of College Station was called to order by Mayor Mooney at 3:03
p.m. on November 27, 2018 in the Administrative Conference Room of the City of College Station City Hall.
Regular Agenda Item No. 2 - Presentation, possible action, and discussion of minutes for the Audit
Committee meeting held on September 25, 2018.
MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Harvell and a second by Mayor Mooney, the Audit
Committee voted three (2) for and zero (0) opposed, to approve the September 25, 2018 Audit Committee
minutes. The motion carried unanimously.
Regular Agenda Item No. 3 - Presentation, possible action. and discussion concerning the City Internal
Auditor's Follow Up Audit of the Public Works Sanitation Division.
Ty Elliott, Internal Auditor, presented the City Internal Auditor's Follow Up Audit Report of the Public
Works Sanitation Division. For the most part the recommendations have been or are in the process of being
implemented. At the direction of the audit committee, the city is to continue with the "No Fault Policy" for
waste collection. It was the direction of the audit committee to keep with the current level of waste collection
service.
Regular Agenda Item No. 4 - Presentation, possible action, and discussion of amending the FY19 City
Internal Auditor's Office's annual Audit Plan.
Ty Elliott, Internal Auditor, informed the audit committee that Madison Rorschach, Assistant Internal
Auditor, will be leaving the City. He proposed a potential FY19 auditing schedule. Audit committee directed
staff to look for a new audit assistant instead of stopping the continuous auditing implementation.
Regular Agenda Item No. 5 - Presentation, possible action. and discussion regarding future agenda
items.
There were no future agenda items discussed.
Regular Agenda Item No. 6 - Adjourn.
There being no further business, Mayor Mooney adjourned the meeting at 4:14 p.m. on 'uesday, November
27, 2018.
oney, ivyayor
ATTEST:
4)12A-c,
Y}i$tte Dela Torre, Deputy Local Registrar
TY ELLIOTT CITY INTERNAL AUDIT OFFICE AUDIT COMMITTEE
City Internal Auditor 1101 Texas Ave. Mayor Karl Mooney
telliott@cstx.gov College Station, TX 77840 Mayor Pro Tem James Benham
TEL: (979) 764-6269 Councilmember Linda Harvell
Mike Ashfield
Nate Sharp
TO: Audit Committee Members
FROM: Ty Elliott, City Internal Auditor
DATE: November 20, 2018
SUBJECT: Public Works: Sanitation Division Audit Follow Up Report
A follow up audit of the Sanitation Division’s October 2017 Audit was conducted per direction of the
Audit Committee as part of the fiscal year 2019 audit plan and pursuant to Article II Section 30 of the
College Station City Charter. We conducted this follow up audit in accordance with generally accepted
government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on
our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings
and conclusions based on our audit objectives.
This report summarizes the Solid Waste (previously Sanitation) Division audit’s recommendations,
management’s responses, and our audit follow up findings, which describe to what degree City
Management has implemented the Audit Office’s recommendations since publication of the original
report (October 2017). In addition, a section has been included at the end of this report that address our
opinion on the Public Works Department’s and Solid Waste Division’s responses to the motor vehicle
accident that occurred on 09/20/18.
The methodology used to complete the audit objectives included:
• Interviewing pertinent City staff members, including Public Works and Solid Waste
management;
• Reviewing documentation regarding policy, procedure, and operational changes, including FY18
and FY19 budget documents, Solid Waste publications, e-mail communications, etc.;
• Analyzing current residential and commercial customer collection schedules and routes; and
• Reviewing documentation on the 09/20/18 motor vehicle accident including the police report,
Solid Waste memoranda, etc.
Sincerely,
Ty L Elliott
CIA, CFE, CGAP, COSO
City Internal Auditor
2 | Page
Recommendations & Follow Up Findings
Some Previous Audit Recommendations Require Further Direction
1. Investigate accountable routing methods. Recently, the City hired a consultant to develop new
routes. While this will help with route balancing, it does not ensure that routes will be driven as
designed. For this reason, we recommend investigating on-board computers for Sanitation
vehicles. These systems have many benefits including accountability for drivers and customers,
potential integration with billing, and turn-by-turn route directions. This being said, on-board
computers would require several operational changes to be most effective including: placing
customer service representatives as the main educator of customers; changing policy to
embolden drivers to leave obstructed canisters as defined by the Division; and increasing
scheduling flexibility through additional cross-training.
Management Response: Management concurs with this recommendation. The division will
investigate on-board computer systems and associated operational changes in order to improve
safety, accountability, and efficiency in solid waste operations.
Audit Follow Up Finding: Implementation in Progress
Solid Waste has attached six collection vehicles with video cameras that provide a 360° view
around the truck. This video can be monitored by the vehicle’s driver while on route to increase
safety and can be reviewed by Solid Waste management to encourage equipment operator
accountability. This technology will continue to be implemented as old trucks are replaced. An
example of this system is shown in Video 1.
Video 1: Solid Waste 360° Collection
In addition, the City Manager’s Office has begun work on identifying and implementing a video,
GPS, and diagnostics solution for certain divisions – including Solid Waste – of the City’s Fleet.
This solution should be able to provide turn-by-turn route instructions to Solid Waste Equipment
Operators, which will increase efficiency and bolster spare operator 1 effectiveness. The project
budget of $420,000 was approved during the fiscal year 2019 annual budget process and will be
led by the Information Technology Department.
2. Develop stronger enforcement methods for obstructed canisters. Tagging residential carts is not
an effective deterrent to disregarding collection guidelines since carts are typically collected
anyway. For this reason, a process should be established that compels customers to follow
guidelines. For this process to be effective, the Division must communicate the change in
procedure to the public before it goes into effect, and an “obstruction” must be clearly defined
by the Division. This recommendation could be fulfilled through recommendation 1.
1 “Spare” Solid Waste Equipment Operators fill in on all collection vehicles when the standard driver is on leave.
3 | Page
Management Response: Management somewhat concurs with this recommendation and will be
investigating best practices in the industry to determine an effective method of communicating
collection guidelines. However, regardless of the reason for an uncollected cart, returning for
collection of that cart is a customer service issue and prevents issues with the next scheduled
collection.
Audit Follow Up Finding: No Concurment
The City currently employs a “No Fault Collection” policy. This policy allows the City to provide a
high level of customer service that the City’s residents have come to expect. This being said, this
level of service comes at a cost to the City via time, money, and safety. The magnitude of these
costs were explained in further detail in the 2017 Performance Audit of Public Works: Sanitation
Division.
3. Develop hiring guidelines based on route balancing. At this time, Sanitation typically requests
new positions once overtime exceeds a certain level, however, overtime is not a suitable method
for identifying hiring needs. Instead the Division should develop route balancing standards based
on current collection times and industry guidelines to signal a need for new route cycles, new
employees, and investment in equipment and vehicles.
Management Response: Management concurs with this recommendation. Staff will research
industry best management practices to revise hiring guidelines to reflect metrics associated with
route balancing.
Audit Follow Up Finding: Not Implemented
At this time, hiring guidelines based on route balancing have not been developed. Instead, hiring
decisions (i.e. when to add a new route) are made qualitatively based on the Division foremen’s
observations of equipment operator workloads, including number of canisters collected, Division
overtime, City growth, etc. The Division should continue investigating hiring best practices for the
industry and formalize these procedures to facilitate route balancing and efficiency.
4. Institute a hierarchal promotional system for route managers. The Division is currently faced
with short staffing issues, which are compounded by single-service drivers. Creating a hierarchal
system for route managers based on the vehicle types they can operate will increase scheduling
flexibility for the Division and may indicate employee motivation levels. Moreover, this system
could give employees a further sense of direction and growth in a Division with few opportunities
to advance.
Management Response: Management concurs with this recommendation. The division is working
on a hierarchal system by updating job descriptions that will allow employees to advance based
on their ability to operate different vehicle types.
Audit Follow Up Finding: Implementation in Progress
As of this report, the Division has requested and been denied a hierarchal promotional system 2
for Solid Waste Equipment Operators (i.e. Route Managers). Human Resources in conjunction
with the City Manager’s Office made this decision by considering similar career progressions in
other divisions (such as Street Maintenance Equipment Operators I and II) and comparing current
Solid Waste Equipment Operator pay ranges to the market. After discussing this issue with HR 3
2 Within the City’s pay structure this is called a career progression track.
3 It should be noted that Human Resources was not contacted before issuing the original recommendation.
4 | Page
and Solid Waste, an Equipment Operator II position may not be suitable for the City’s current pay
structure.
This being said, Solid Waste still faces staffing issues. The Division currently employs a few drivers
as “spares,” who should be able to fill in to any position when a single-service employee takes
leave. However, staffing these multi-service driver positions (i.e. spares) is difficult as there are
currently few incentives for Equipment Operators to train on different vehicles.
We have prepared two possible options that may mitigate this difficulty, however, other options
could become apparent through discussions between Human Resources and Solid Waste.
• Performance evaluations and related pay increases could be used more effectively to
incentivize vehicle cross-training as required by the current Equipment Operator job
description.
• The Division could be restructured to classify most Equipment Operators as single-service
and to include a few multi-service Equipment Operator positions.
5. Separate residential recycling and refuse collection days. Residential refuse and recycling cart
collection are negatively affected by same-day collection. Splitting the two collections to separate
days would increase efficiency for both the Sanitation Division and Brazos Valley Recycling. This
being said, adequate communication of this change is critical, and collection information is
currently difficult to find. It is key that the Division not only run communication campaigns, but
make collection information easier to locate if either the recycling or refuse collection day is to be
changed. These communications will help to mitigate confusion and criticism from customers.
Management Response: Management concurs with this recommendation. Dual collection
schedules were initially implemented for citizen convenience. The division conducts a city wide
balancing project every five years in order to help balance collection routes between all
operations. The next city wide balance will occur around mid-year of 2018. As part of this city
wide project, the division plans to separate recycling days from refuse days in order increase
efficiency in both areas.
Audit Follow Up Finding: Implemented
After analyzing the City’s residential collection schedule, we found that same-day residential
recycling and refuse collection has been discontinued for about 91.5% of residential locations.
While same-day collection still occurs every other Friday, this separation has significantly reduced
the risks – both cost- and safety-wise – of same-day recycling and refuse collection. This decision
was made to avoid operational hindrances to both Brazos Valley Recycling and the City’s Solid
Waste Division.
6. Review Sanitation’s role in the City’s construction and development process. Many City
construction standards delay the Division in their collection efforts. Currently, Sanitation reviews
some development plans before they are approved, but these comments are not always fully
incorporated into the final plan set. Greater consideration of Sanitation requests and comparing
the costs and benefits of some construction standards could increase the Division’s efficiency.
Management Response: Management concurs with this recommendation. Some examples of
standards that hinder collections are cul-de-sac streets that are not wide enough for our collection
vehicles to make a complete turn without backing up and dumpster enclosures that have been
5 | Page
grandfathered from the old conventional rear load collection system that the city used prior to
moving to an automated system. Sanitation staff will continue to communicate with planners on
changes to the design guidelines and standards needed for efficient and effective solid waste
collection operations.
Audit Follow Up Finding: Implemented
The Solid Waste Division Manager has become more involved in the approval process of new site
plans. In addition to commenting on drawings within the City’s TRAKiT system, the Division
Manager is required to sign off on a project before it receives its certificate of occupancy.
Furthermore, the Division Manager and Foremen have begun visiting sites during construction to
inspect dumpster enclosures; when an enclosure is not up to standards the construction manager
is informed and is required to correct the issues.
7. Adjust commercial customer scheduling procedures to aid route balancing. As a courtesy, the
City allows commercial customers to control what day their refuse is collected, which creates
inconsistency in commercial routes throughout the week. Ending this practice would help balance
routes, however, we understand that some business may need collection on a certain day. For
this reason, an appeal process should be established to allow these businesses to request a
certain collection day.
Management Response: Management concurs with this recommendation. Staff will be
investigating various methods to balance the commercial customer demand across the work
week.
Audit Follow Up Finding: Not Implemented
The City’s Solid Waste Division provides a very high level of customer service to citizens and
businesses throughout the City. As part of this customer service, businesses’ requests regarding
their pickup schedule are honored by the Division. However, this hinders route balancing
throughout the week. While we found no evidence that these scheduling procedures had been
adjusted, the Division has and continues to make every effort to balance commercial routes while
maintaining this level of customer service. This being said, limiting when and how frequently
businesses can request collection, or charging a higher price for collection on busier days may
increase collection efficiency.
If the City wishes to continue with their current level of service, the following factors should be
considered to aid route balancing and efficiency efforts:
• Multi-family collection schedules are easier to manipulate than commercial businesses;
• Geographically-orienting routes, while typically effective, may also be hindering route
balancing due to commercial growth patterns.
6 | Page
8. Design and communicate videos addressing safety surrounding Sanitation vehicles to the
public. Sanitation has developed videos in the past to educate the public on collection standards.
We believe developing a video showing the risks Sanitation vehicles present could increase
pedestrian safety.
Management Response: Management concurs with this recommendation. Staff will be working
closely with our Public Communications department to develop educational videos with the intent
of improving pedestrian and vehicular safety.
Audit Follow Up Finding: Implementation In Progress
The Public Works Department plans to work with Public Communications in the upcoming
months to develop educational videos regarding employees operating in the City’s right-of-way.
This includes not only Solid Waste equipment operators, but also street maintenance crews,
traffic signal, markings, and sign crews, public safety staff, and more. In addition, Public Works
hopes to partner with other local agencies, such as the City of Bryan and Brazos County, to
implement a large-scale safety campaign for those individuals performing operations in the public
right-of-way.
7 | Page
Solid Waste Has Responded Adequately to the Motor Vehicle Accident
Public Works and the Solid Waste Division have begun increasing safety precautions. On
September 20th, 2018 a Solid Waste Equipment Operator was struck and severely injured by
distracted driver while outside of the cab collecting refuse. In response to this accident, Solid
Waste has taken the following actions within their Division:
• Begun collecting refuse from the pickup location in question via a pick-up truck – this
limits staff exposure as the collection vehicle is not in the right-of-way;
• Ordered “Slow Down to Get Around” stickers to be applied to Solid Waste vehicles;
• Investigated additional blue and amber lights that will be attached to Solid Waste
vehicles to increase day-time visibility;
• Added safe guards to Solid Waste vehicles via the fleet replacement process; and
• Identified high-risk pick up locations in order to increase equipment operator safety
through the use of an attenuator truck.4
In addition, the Public Works Department, in conjunction with the Solid Waste Division and other
stakeholders, have begun planning and generating traction for a large-scale, multi-organization
campaign to educate citizens and promote the safety of employees who operate in the right-of-
way. The Department has also developed the following proposals to generally increase the safety
of all its right-of-way employees – including Solid Waste equipment operators:
• Purchase two attenuator trucks to protect operations in higher speed right-of-ways (i.e.
arterials and major collectors);
• Replace current left-hand steer vehicles with right-hand steer to increase the safety of
staff when dismounting; and
• Apply additional reflectors, warning lights, and beacons to increase vehicle visibility.
Given these responses, it is the opinion of our Office that Solid Waste and Public Works have
responded adequately to the motor vehicle accident.
Solid waste collection is an inherently high-risk function. While these actions and proposals should
decrease both the Solid Waste Division’s and the Public Works Department’s safety risk, Solid
Waste Equipment Operators operate in risky areas and use complex, hazardous machinery. The
2017 Audit of Solid Waste found that the Division was adequately mitigating safety risk; however,
the City’s “No Fault Collection” policy and responsiveness to customer complaints increases risk
to the Division’s employees. A change regarding customer service level would need strong
support from both the City Manager’s Office and the City Council.
4 An attenuator truck is placed between approaching traffic and the work zone and is designed to safety absorbed the impact of a vehicle.
Memorandum
To: Ty Elliott, Internal Auditor
From: Donald Harmon, Director of Public Works
Date: November 20, 2018
Re: Public Works Sanitation Division / Audit Follow Up Report
____________________________________________________________________________________
This memorandum is to convey management responses to the Sanitation Division Audit Follow Up
Report.
1. Investigate accountable routing methods – In Progress
Management concurs with the follow-up recommendation. The Division is working closely with
the City Manager’s Office and IT to develop and implement the best system in order to improve
safety, accountability, and efficiency in solid waste operations. The City of Bryan is in the
process of implementing a turnkey system that includes routing, vehicle location service and
video storage on all its solid waste collection vehicles. Staff is working closely with COB to
determine if their selected system is the best solution for our solid waste division.
2. Develop stronger enforcement methods for obstructed canisters. – Management Partially
Concurs
Management does not concur with elimination of the “No Fault Collection” Policy as it would be
a serious downgrade to the City’s customer service standards. Additionally, as a university city,
collections take place in a unique environment where a substantial portion of the population
either relocates annually, or are new residents to the city at the start of each semester.
Elimination of the policy would cause significant administrative issues and customer complaints..
3. Develop hiring guidelines based on route balancing. – Not Implemented
Management concurs with the follow-up recommendation. Staff continues to research industry
best management practices to revise hiring guidelines to reflect metrics associated with route
balancing and loads.
4. Institute a hierarchal promotional system for route managers. – Implementation in Progress
Management somewhat concurs with the follow-up recommendation. The Division will
continue working on a hierarchal system by updating job descriptions to accurately reflect
position responsibilities in order to allow employees to advance through career progression
based on their ability to operate different vehicles types and achieve solid waste certifications.
5. Separate residential recycling and refuse collection days. – Implemented
Management concurs with the follow-up recommendation. Separating the collection days was
an immense undertaking that took months to implement, including educating and responding to
customers.
6. Review Sanitation’s role in the City’s construction and development process. – Implemented
Management concurs with the follow-up recommendation.
7. Adjust commercial scheduling procedures to aid route balancing. – Not Implemented
Management somewhat concurs with the follow-up recommendation. Staff will continue
investigating best industry practices to determine cost effective and balanced commercial
routing throughout the work week. Staff does make recommendations to commercial customers
to smooth the workload over the week, but some customers require or are required by their
management to be collected on specific days.
8. Design and communicate videos addressing safety surrounding Solid Waste vehicles to the
public. – In Progress
Management concurs with the follow-up recommendation. Staff is working closely with the Risk
Management Division and Public Communications Department to develop educational videos
with the intent of improving pedestrian and vehicular safety for all types of employees working
in the City’s right-of-way. This campaign will be ongoing and involves multiple internal
departments and outside local and state agencies.
Memorandum
To: Ty Elliot, Internal Auditor From: Alison Pond, Director of Human Resources and Risk Management
Date: November 16, 2018 RE: Public Works: Sanitation Division October 2017 Audit Follow Up Report
Thank you for allowing the opportunity for Human Resources to provide a formal response regarding the Public Works: Sanitation Division October 2017 Audit Follow Up Report. The extent to which Human Resources agree with the Audit Recommendation & Findings as it relates to the pay recommendations, is that cross-training drivers to operate a variety of vehicle types may increase scheduling flexibility and assist with staffing issues for the Public Works Sanitation Division.
The compensation related recommendation contained within the report of instituting a hierarchal promotional system for Solid Waste Equipment Operators was not based on relative market data, salary survey findings, internal job class alignment, nor any other relative data to sufficiently support the recommendation.
The audit recommendation we consider to be most practical and achievable, with the potential for the greatest impact in achieving the desired results, is to improve cross-training opportunities for the Solid Waste Equipment Operators and for the department to effectively utilize the performance pay system to incentivize and compensate accordingly, within the current pay range in which the position was recently realigned to in October 2018.
Human Resources will continue to work closely with the Public Works department in relation to the position assessment, monitoring of staffing levels and/or discussing other possible measures as appropriate.
If you have any questions or would like to further discuss our response to the audit report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.