Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/02/2018 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionCollege Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting. City Hall Council Chambers6:30 PMThursday, August 2, 2018 1. Call the meeting to order. 2.Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff. *Final Plat ~ Minor Replat ~ Redmond Terrace Subdivision Block 4, Lot 21-R ~ Case #FPCO2018-000004 18-04364. Sponsors:Lazo Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the consideration of the 2018 P&Z Plan of Work. 18-05145. Sponsors:Golbabai 2018 Plan of WorkAttachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: *Thursday, August 9, 2018 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 5:00 p.m. Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison - Kee) *Thursday, August 16, 2018 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. Regular 7:00 p.m. *Thursday, August 23, 2018 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 5:00 p.m. Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison - Oldham) *Thursday, September 6, 2018 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. Regular 7:00 p.m. 18-04996. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following item: *An Ordinance Amendment amending Appendix A, Membership and Terms for the Bicycle, Pedestrian & Greenways Advisory Board, Planning & Zoning Commission and Design Review Board. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 19, 2018, and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on July 26, 2018, and voted (6-0) to approve the request. 18-05007. Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 7/27/2018 Meeting Agenda - Final Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop August 2, 2018Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Agenda - Final 8. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board. 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 10. Adjourn. The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on July 27, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. _____________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 7/27/2018 Page 1 of 4  2018 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work Comprehensive Plan Items UDO & Comprehensive Plan Annual Review Summary: Review of adopted UDO amendments and a summary of the implementation of adopted master plans and neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely: Central College Station, Eastgate, Southside Area, Wellborn Community, and South Knoll Area neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian & Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste Water, Medical District, and Economic Development master plans. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion: On-Going 2018 Existing Conditions Report Summary: Develop and adopt the 2018 Existing Conditions Report in preparation of the 10-Year Comprehensive Plan Update Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai, P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion: Fall 2018 10-Year Comprehensive Plan Update Summary: Begin the first phases of updating the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. This phase will include forming a joint City Council-P&Z Comprehensive Plan Subcommittee, selecting consultants, and planning for community outreach efforts. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai, P&DS Staff Anticipated Initiation: Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan Update Summary: Bring additional updates to the Planning and Zoning Commission as the Master Plan update moves forward. Project Dates: 4/19/18: P&Z Commission recommended approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment updating the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. 5/14/18: City Council adopted the Comprehensive Plan Amendment updating the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. Staff Assigned: Venessa Garza Completed: May 14, 2018 Page 2 of 4  Neighborhood Integrity Items Neighborhood Conservation Overlay and Student Housing in Established Single- Family Neighborhoods Community Meeting Summary: Conduct a community outreach meeting to obtain neighborhood, developer, and community feedback on potential options to provide more options and flexibility to the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO), as well as obtain feedback on other options to manage student housing in single-family neighborhoods, such as more flexibility for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and changing the off-street parking and drainage requirements. Report findings to P&Z and Council for direction on possible ordinance amendments. Project Dates: 4/30/18: Two community meeting to be held discussing possible changes to accessible living quarters, single-family on-site parking, single- family height protection, the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay, and a middle housing zoning district. An online survey covering these same topics will also open from April 30th – May 14th. 6/21/18: Anticipated P&Z Presentation of neighborhood workshop survey results for accessory living quarters, single-family on-site parking, and single-family height protection (LS & PAZ). 6/28/18: Anticipated City Council Presentation of neighborhood workshop survey results for accessory living quarters, single-family on-site parking, and single-family height protection (LS & PAZ). 7/5/18: P&Z Presentation of neighborhood workshop survey results for the neighborhood conservation overlay and middle housing (JG). 7/12/18: City Council Presentation of neighborhood workshop survey results for the neighborhood conservation overlay and middle housing (JG). 8/9/18: Follow-up City Council Presentation of neighborhood workshop survey results for the neighborhood conservation overlay and middle housing (JG). 8/16/18: Anticipated ordinance amendments to P&Z for Accessory Living Quarters and Single-Family Parking (RL). 9/13/18: Anticipated ordinance amendments to City Council for Accessory Living Quarters and Single-Family Parking (RL). Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai, Jenifer Paz, Lance Simms Anticipation Initiation: April 30, 2018 UDO Regulatory Items Evaluation of UDO Regulations Summary:Project Dates: Continue review of UDO requirements that add minimal value as identified by staff and consider opportunities to reduce regulations and streamline processes. Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Initiation: Page 3 of 4  Sign Ordinance Revisions Summary: Review and update the City’s sign ordinance in light of the recent Supreme Court decision regarding sign regulations based upon content. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Molly Hitchcock, Rachel Lazo & Legal Anticipated Completion: Winter 2018 Non-Residential Landscaping Requirements Summary: Adopt an ordinance updating the city’s landscaping requirements (including streetscaping and buffer standards) and include options for water-conserving landscaping. Project Dates: 5/17/18: P&Z Commission consideration of an ordinance amendment updating the City’s landscaping requirements. 6/14/18: City Council adopted an ordinance amendment updating the City’s landscaping requirements. Staff Assigned: Rachel Lazo and Jade Broadnax Completed: June 14, 2018 On-Going Items Economic Development Updates Summary: Receive regular updates from the Economic Development Department. Receive a presentation and discussion on “fast-tracking” reviews for Economic Development projects that have a significant economic impact. Project Dates: 4/19/2018: Economic Development update given on Spring Creek Business Park (JP). 8/16/2018: Anticipated Economic Development Update Staff Assigned: Economic Development Anticipated Completion: On-Going Planning Performance Measures Summary: Develop and regularly report on the “top three” performance indicators. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Completion: On-Going Semi-Annual Review of Pre-Application Conference Surveys Summary: Provide an update on the survey results from the Pre-Application Conference process. Project Dates: 6/7/18: Provide an update on the status of the PAC meeting process and implementation of the PAC survey. (JG) Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Completion: On-Going Page 4 of 4  Impact Fees Summary: Provide a semi-annual update on impact fees, to include impact fee collections and planned projects. Project Dates: 5/3/2018: P&Z Presentation on the Impact-Fee Semi-Annual Report. 5/24/2018: City Council Presentation the Impact-Fee Semi-Annual Report. Staff Assigned: Carol Cotter Anticipated Completion: On-Going Educational/Informational Items City of Bryan Update Summary: Hear a presentation from the City of Bryan to discuss areas of mutual concern and partnership opportunities across jurisdictional boundaries. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Anticipated Completion: October 2018 College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting. City Hall Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, August 2, 2018 1.Call meeting to order. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 4.Consent Agenda Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes. *July 19, 2018 ~ Workshop *July 19, 2018 ~ Regular 18-04984.1 July 19 2018 Workshop July 19 2018 Regular Attachments: Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development 18-05036. Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 7/27/2018 Meeting Agenda - Final Planning and Zoning Commission Regular August 2, 2018Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural and GS General Suburban to GC General Commercial on approximately 16.9 acres of land generally located at the southeast intersection of General Parkway and Holleman Drive South, along Old Wellborn Road. Case #REZ2018-000011 (Note: Final action regarding this item will be considered at the August 23, 2018 City Council meeting - subject to change) Sponsors:Lazo Staff Report Background Information Vicinity Aerial SAM Rezoning Exhibit Zoning Map Application TIA Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use & Character Map from Suburban Commercial to Urban for approximately 11.1 acres located on the west side of Turkey Creek Road, approximately 500 feet south of HSC Parkway. Case #CPA2018-000002 (Note: Final action regarding this item will be considered at the August 23, 2018 City Council meeting - subject to change.) 18-05127. Sponsors:Helton Staff Report Background Information Vicinity & Aerial Map Application Comprehensive Plan Exhibit Future Land Use and Character Map Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix “A”, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from Rural to Multi-Family on approximately 11.1 acres located on the west side of Turkey Creek Road, approximately 500 feet south of HSC Parkway. Case 18-05138. Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 7/27/2018 August 2, 2018Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final #REZ2018-000009 (Note: Final action regarding this item will be considered at the August 23, 2018 City Council meeting - subject to change.) Sponsors:Helton Staff Report Background Information Vicinity, Aerial & Small Area Map Rezoning Exhibit Zoning Map Application Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 2, “Development Review Bodies”, Section 2.8 “Administrator”; Article 3, “Development Review Procedures”, Section 3.12 “Building Permit” and Section 3.13 “Certificate of Occupancy”; Article 5, “District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards”, Section 5.2 “Residential Dimensional Standards”; Article 7, “General Development Standards”, Section 7.3 “Off-Street Parking Standards”, Section 7.6 “Landscaping and Tree Protection”, and Section 7.10 “Non-Residential Architectural Standards; and Article 8, “Subdivision Design and Improvements,” Section 8.3. “General Requirements and Minimum Standards of Design for Subdivisions within the City Limits”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, to correct minor text omissions, correct an outdated reference, and address clerical errors. Case #ORDA2018-000007. (Note: Final action regarding this item will be considered at the August 23, 2018 City Council meeting - subject to change) 18-04879. Sponsors:Gray Memo 8-2-2018 Redlines Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix “A”, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 7.2.H, “Height,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas. Case #ORDA2018-000008 (Note: Final action regarding this item will be considered at the August 23, 2018 City Council meeting - subject to change.) 18-049710. Sponsors:Simms Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 7/27/2018 August 2, 2018Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final Memo Current Version Redlined Version Proposed Version Attachments: 11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 12. Adjourn The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on July 27, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. _____________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 4 College Station, TX Printed on 7/27/2018 July 19, 2018 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Workshop Meeting July 19, 2018 6:30 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Johnny Burns, Bill Mather, Jeremy Osborne, Elianor Vessali and Dennis Christiansen COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Linda Harvell CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, David Schmitz, Dave Coleman, Alaina Helton, Justin Constantino, Jason Schubert, Erika Bridges, Tim Horn, Alma Guerra, Venessa Garza, Carla Robinson, Eric Chafin and Kristen Hejny 1.Call the meeting to order. Chairperson Kee called the Workshop Meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. 2.Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. There was general discussion on Regular Agenda Item #6. 3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. 4.Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding exclusive bicycle facilities such as the Veloway in Austin, Texas. Bicycle, Pedestrian & Greenways Senior Program Manager Garza was available to present information on veloways. There was general discussion amongst the Commission. 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. *Thursday, July 26, 2018 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 5:00 p.m. and Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison – Burns) *Thursday, August 2, 2018 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. July 19, 2018 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 2 *Thursday, August 9, 2018 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 5:00 p.m. and Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison – Kee) *Thursday, August 16, 2018 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following item: *A Rezoning for approximately three acres located at 1726 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South from M-1 Light Industrial to GC General Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on June 21, 2018, and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on July 12, 2018, and voted (5-0-1) to approve the request. *A Rezoning for approximately five acres located on Holleman Drive north of the intersection of Holleman Drive South and Deacon Drive West from PDD Planned Development District to GS General Suburban. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on June 21, 2018, and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on July 12, 2018, and voted (6-0) to approve the request. 7. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Bio Corridor Board. There was general discussion. 8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion. 9. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 7:06 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Jane Kee, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin. Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services July 19, 2018 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting July 19, 2018 7:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Johnny Burns, Bill Mather, Jeremy Osborne, Elianor Vessali and Dennis Christiansen COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Linda Harvell CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, Alaina Helton, Justin Constantino, Jason Schubert, Erika Bridges, Tim Horn, Alma Guerra, Carla Robinson, Eric Chafin and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Hear Citizens 4. Consent Agenda 4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from meetings. *Casey Oldham ~ July 19, 2018 4.2 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes. *July 5, 2018 ~ Workshop *July 5, 2018 ~ Regular Commissioner Osborne motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed. 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a subdivision discretionary request to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.3.E.4.b, ‘Adequate Street Access,’ and a public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Pebble Creek Subdivision Phase 2C Block 20 Lots 1R-4R & Common Area being a replat of Pebble Creek Subdivision Phase July 19, 2018 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 2C consisting of 4 single-family residential lots on approximately 1.4 acres located at 5101 Pebble Creek Parkway generally located at the intersection of Pebble Creek Parkway and Champions Boulevard. Case #FP2018-000011 Senior Planner Constantino presented the discretionary item and Final Plat to the Commission and recommended approval. Applicant, Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan Engineers, was available to present to the Commission regarding the discretionary item and Final Plat. There was general discussion amongst the Commission. Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing. Bill Howell, Pebble Creek, College Station, spoke in opposition of the final plat citing concerns for access, adjacent property owners and parking. Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mather motioned to approve the discretionary item and Final Plat as presented. Commissioner Osborne seconded the motion. There was general discussion on the discretionary item amongst the Commission. The motion passed (6-0). 7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District to WRS Wellborn Restricted Suburban for approximately 21 acres of land located approximately 0.18 miles south from the intersection of Greens Prairie Road West and Royder Road. Case #REZ2018-000012 (Note: Final action regarding this item will be considered at the August 9, 2018 City Council meeting – subject to change) Senior Planner Helton presented the Rezoning to the Commission and recommended approval. Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mather motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning. Commissioner Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 1, “General Provisions,” Section 2.6, “Bicycle, Pedestrian, Greenways Advisory Board,” Subsection B, “Membership and Terms,” 2, July 19, 2018 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 “Terms,” and Article 2, “Development Review Bodies,” Section 2.2, “Planning and Zoning Commission,” Subsection B, “Membership and Terms,” 2, “Terms,” and 3 “Term Limits,” and Section 2.5, “Design Review Board,” Subsection B, “Membership and Terms,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas. (Note: Final action regarding this item will be considered at the July 26, 2018 City Council meeting – subject to change.) City Attorney Robinson presented the Ordinance Amendment to the Commission and recommended approval. Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing No one spoke. Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mather motioned to recommend approval of the Ordinance Amendment. Commissioner Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Chairperson Kee asked for additional information regarding Fire Code requirements versus Subdivision Regulations for residential developments containing more than 30 lots. 10. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 7:37 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Jane Kee, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services August 2, 2018 Regular Agenda Rezoning – Butler Tract To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural and GS General Suburban to GC General Commercial on approximately 16.9 acres of land generally located at the southeast intersection of General Parkway and Holleman Drive South, along Old Wellborn Road. Case #REZ2018-000011 (Final action on this item is scheduled for the August 23, 2018 City Council Meeting- subject to change) Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request with the condition that the development does not exceed 198 trips in the PM peak hour, as identified by scenario 3 in the TIA until a second point of access is provided. The trip generation will be monitored with each Site Plan application, and if any proposed development exceeds the allowable threshold, improvements will be made at that time. Summary: The applicant has requested a rezoning for approximately 16.9 acres of land from R Rural and GS General Suburban to GC General Commercial. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Urban and in Growth Area V. The Urban land use designation is generally for areas that should have a very intense level of development activities. These areas will tend to consist of townhomes, duplexes, and high-density apartments. General commercial and office uses, business parks, and vertical mixed-use may also be permitted within growth and redevelopment areas. For the Urban area located within Growth Area V, the Comprehensive Plan specifically states that intense land use activities including general commercial, office uses, townhomes, high-density apartments, and vertical mixed-use are appropriate. The property is currently zoned R Rural, a zoning district for low-density acreage home sites. The proposed zoning of General Commercial would better suit the current designation on the Comprehensive Plan for more intense uses. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The properties to the south and east of the subject property are zoned R Rural and currently undeveloped. They were designated R Rural upon annexation, but the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use and Character Map shows this area as Urban and Growth Area V, which allows for very dense development. The property to the west is currently developed with multi-family structures. The property to the north, across FM 2154, is zoned GC General Commercial and currently under construction for various commercial uses. This proposed zoning change would be compatible with the adjacent properties. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The property is currently zoned R Rural and GS General Suburban. Rural uses would not be ideal here due to the size, location, and close proximity of high-classification roads and commercial uses. The size of the tract would allow for approximately 8 rural, single- family homes, which is significantly less dense than projected in the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and would not be compatible with the adjacent multi-family development. However, the proposed zoning district would allow for higher-density residential and commercial uses, which would be more appropriate for a tract immediately abutting a 6-lane major arterial and railroad. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: Water service will be provided by Wellborn Special Utility District (SUD). It has been verified that the existing 12-inch Wellborn SUD waterline on the west side of Holleman Drive South may be extended to the subject tract to provide required domestic and fire flow service. There is also an existing 10-inch sanitary sewer line along the northwestern property boundary available to serve the site. Based on estimated sewer demands, existing infrastructure appears to have sufficient capacity to support the proposed use. Currently, there is no FEMA Special Flood Hazard area located on this tract. The property generally drains to the east within a tributary of the Bee Creek Drainage Basin. Detention will be required with site development. Drainage and other required public infrastructure shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject tract is located at the temporary end of General Parkway which is designated as a Minor Collector on the Thoroughfare Plan. General Parkway will be extended further to the south and eventually to Cain Road as the remainder of the Butler tract and other tracts in the area are developed. Additional connections between General Parkway and Holleman Drive South will also occur as future development occurs. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was performed for the rezoning request. The TIA included the completion of the Holleman Drive South widening to a 4-lane Minor Arterial which is underway as a City capital project. As the subject tract currently only has one roadway connection and that is shared with the adjacent Aspen Heights multi-family development, the TIA provided three different scenarios of commercial development intensity to assess the availability of roadway capacity in the area. In order to maintain an acceptable level of service of General Parkway at Holleman Drive South and North Dowling Road at Holleman Drive South, the TIA recommends limiting the number of development trips to up to 198 trips in the PM peak hour. Staff concurs with the limitation recommended in the TIA and recommends that a condition is placed on the rezoning that the development be limited to 198 trips in the PM peak hour which can be reassessed and no longer in effect after a second street or Public Way access point is provided that further distributes traffic. 5. The marketability of the property: The subject property is adjacent to an existing multi- family development, and surrounded by property also slated for dense urban-style development. This site does not have a high potential to be marketed as a rural/single-family residential development as it is located along a major arterial, adjacent to a railroad right-of- way, and will have frontage to a future minor collector. Due to these characteristics, it has limited potential with an R Rural zoning designation. Overall, the proposed GC General Commercial rezoning is anticipated to increase the marketability of the property. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request with the condition that the development does not exceed 198 trips in the PM peak hour until a second point of access is provided. This will be reevaluated upon each Site Plan application, and if any proposed development exceeds the allowable threshold, improvements will be made at that time. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Background Information 2. Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3. Rezoning Exhibit 4. Zoning Map 5. Application 6. Traffic Impact Analysis NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 2, 2018 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: August 23, 2018 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: The Barracks and Great Oaks Property owner notices mailed: Ten (10) Contacts in support: None Contacts in opposition: None Inquiry contacts: None ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North (across FM 2154) Urban GC General Commercial Commercial South Urban R Rural Undeveloped East Urban R Rural Undeveloped West Urban PDD Planned Development District Multi-Family DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: Tract 1 - Annexed February 1970 Tract 2 - Annexed November 2002 Zoning: Tract 1 - Zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential upon Annexation Tract 2 - Zoned A-O Agricultural Open upon Annexation A-O Agricultural Open Renamed R Rural (2013) R-1 Single-Family Residential Renamed GS General Suburban (2013) Final Plat: N/A – Property is currently unplatted Site development: Vacant HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTHG E N E R A L P A R KW A Y CALLED OLD HIGHWAY 6 R.O.W.TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: ZONING MAP BUTLER TRACT COMMERCIAL 16.934 ACRES CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, A-7 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SURVEYOR: H. Curtis Strong, RPLS No. 4961 Strong Surveying, LLC 1722 Broadmoor Dr, Ste 105 Bryan, TX 77802 (979) 776-9836 SCALE: AS SHOWN JUNE 2018 OWNER/DEVELOPER: J&J BUTLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LTD 6010 Thoroughbred RDG College Station, TX 77845 VICINITY MAP HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY S.WE L L B O R N R D .HOLLEMAN DR . S . NOT TO SCALE GENERAL PARKWAY View.ashx %d×%d pixels https://collegestation.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=6396934&GUID=C4A29107-F84D-4EDE-8224-8AB0D4AFBCB7[7/27/2018 1:04:09 PM] Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Land affected Legal description of area of proposed change; Present zoning Zoning classification of all abutting land All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. a. b. c. d. e. APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name E-mail Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number TOTAL ACREAGE GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY, IF NOT PLATTED: Name E-mail Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request. Rezoning Application Fee. (Refer to the Planning and Development Fee Schedule for all applicable fees) Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). Copy of a fully dimensioned map Revised 1/17 Page 1 of 3 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: STAFF: LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) ADDRESS NAME OF PROJECT Date of Optional Preapplication Conference GENERAL THIS APPLICATION NOT REQUIRED IF APPLYING ELECTRONICALLY Jim Butler jgb9611@aol.com 6010 Thoroughbred Ridge College Station TX 77845 (979) 229-5471 40.707 South of the Aspen Heights Subdivision at the end of General Parkway J & J Butler Family Partnership, LTD jgb9611@aol.com 6010 Thoroughbred Ridge College Station TX 77845 (979) 229-5471 Crawford Burnett (ICL), Tract 135, 42.738 Acres Holleman Drive South Butler Tract Rezoning 1/31/2018 REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? 1. 2. 3. Present Use of Property Proposed Use of Property This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated and recorded in Volume , Page of the Brazos County Official Records. Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Revised 1/17 Page 2 of 3 Name E-mail Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.): This area of the city has numerous student living developments but very little commercial development to support this residential growth. This zoning change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. The adjacent tract to the northwest is multi-family use and the undeveloped property in this area is Urban Land Use on the comprehensive plan and in Growth Area 5 which is for intense land uses. The zone change will be compatible with the existing and proposed uses of nearby property. Rural General Commercial R-Rural & GS-General Suburban GC-General Commercial 06/30/2006 7551 041 Schultz Engineering, LLC - Joe Schultz P.E.eng@scultzeng.com 911 Southwest Parkway East College Station TX 77840 (979) 764-3900 (979) 764-3910 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. List any other reasons to support this zone change. 5. 6. 7. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. Signature and title Date Revised 1/17 Page 3 of 3 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. 4. The current zoning districts of Rural and a small area of General Suburban would allow only low density residential development, which is not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan therefore is is not suitable for development with its current zoning. There is very little marketability for the property as a large lot residential subdivision in this location. Commercial uses are needed in this area so that nearby residents do not have to leave the area in order to find goods and services they need. Development of this tract will significantly increase the property and sales tax generated by the property. The property has access via General Parkway, all utilities are available and there are no topographical features that present any problems for development so the property is very suitable for General Commercial uses. The maximum number of PM peak hours trips for this area is limited to the trips shown in Table 3 of the Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Binkley and Barfield, INC. and dated June 25, 2018. This provision on the development of this tract will go away when a second point of access is provided by the extension of General Parkway or the addition of another road to Holleman Drive South. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. i TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for Butler Tract College Station, Texas EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Butler Tract in College Station contains approximately 43 acres of land located along Holleman Drive South near General Parkway. It is proposed that 16.9 acres be rezoned for development. The original zoning is Rural; the proposed zoning is General Commercial. This traffic impact analysis (TIA) evaluates the traffic impacts of three development scenarios. The first scenario is a full development using retail assumptions consistent with General Commercial uses in the City ordinance. The second scenario allocates most of the developed area to a Big Shots golf facility, with the remaining area still designated and used as general commercial. The third scenario includes the Big Shots golf facility and applies a reduced intensity of development for the remaining land. The impacts of these three scenarios are evaluated at key intersections along the Holleman Drive South Corridor. The following conditions are included: • Existing (2018) • Background (2021) • Full Build Scenario 1 (2021) • Full Build Scenario 2 (2021) • Full Build Scenario 3 (2021) STUDY APPROACH The Existing (2018) conditions analysis is an evaluation of the existing traffic on the Holleman Drive South corridor in its future configuration as a four-lane road because it is currently under construction to widen to four-lanes. The Background (2021) analysis includes additional traffic generated from developments in the area to model the future conditions without additional impacts from development of the Butler tract. Three Full Build scenarios are examined: One for an intensity of development that includes 100% commercial (retail) use, one scenario that factors in the development of a Big Shots golf facility on most of the 16.9 acres, and a third scenario that includes the Big Shots and restricts the number of trips generated by the remaining land. Traffic from these three scenarios are added to the Background traffic to identify their impact on intersection operations. FINDINGS The capacity analyses forecasted poor or failing operations at Deacon Drive during the Background (2021) period that occur regardless of the development of the Butler Tract. With Scenario 1, representing full development with General Commercial retail assumptions, there are significant operational failings at Dowling Road and at General Parkway. Mitigation with traffic signals was not pursued at these locations, but with less intense trip generation assumptions of Scenario 2. Scenario 2 evaluated the impact of a Big Shots golf facility with some commercial (retail) development. The impacts under Scenario 2 are much smaller than the impacts for Scenario 1, though there are still some undesirable levels of service. In Scenario 3, these issues are mitigated with the further reductions in trips generated. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. ii RECOMMENDATIONS Unless further mitigations are pursued, such as signalization at General Parkway or at Dowling Road, and until General Parkway extends to Deacon Drive, it is recommended that development be limited to generating no more trips than what are shown in Scenario 3. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... i Study Approach ....................................................................................................................................... i Findings ................................................................................................................................................... i Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. ii Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Study Area ................................................................................................................................. 1 Area Development .................................................................................................................................. 1 Streets and Intersections ........................................................................................................................ 1 Proposed Development .............................................................................................................. 6 Trip Distribution .......................................................................................................................... 7 Trip Generation .......................................................................................................................... 7 Projected Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................................... 7 Site Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................................... 7 Background Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................ 12 Total Traffic Volumes. ........................................................................................................................... 13 Intersection Capacity Analysis ..................................................................................................20 Existing (2018) ...................................................................................................................................... 20 Background (2021) ............................................................................................................................... 20 Scenario 1 Full Build (2021) ................................................................................................................. 20 Scenario 2 Full Build (2021) ................................................................................................................. 20 Scenario 3 Full Build (2021) ................................................................................................................. 21 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................................24 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................24 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................24 Appendix ...................................................................................................................................25 Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Site Location ............................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2. Background Developments ......................................................................................... 4 Figure 3. Peak Hour Volumes – Existing (2018) ......................................................................... 5 Figure 4. Trip Distribution ........................................................................................................... 8 Figure 5. Scenario 1 Peak Hour Volumes – Site Generated ....................................................... 9 Figure 6. Scenario 2 Peak Hour Volumes – Site Generated ......................................................10 Figure 7. Scenario 3 Peak Hour Volumes – Site Generated ......................................................11 Figure 8. Peak Hour Volumes – Background (2021) from 2% Growth .......................................14 Figure 9. Peak Hour Volumes – Local Area Projects .................................................................15 Figure 10. Peak Hour Volumes – Total Background Traffic (2021) ............................................16 Figure 11. Peak Hour Volumes – Full Build Scenario 1 (100% Commercial) .............................17 Figure 12. Peak Hour Volumes – Full Build Scenario 2 (Big Shots / Commercial Split) .............18 Figure 13. Peak Hour Volumes – Full Build Scenario 3 .............................................................19 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Scenario 1 Land Use Data ........................................................................................... 6 Table 2. Scenario 2 Land Use Data ........................................................................................... 6 Table 3. Scenario 3 Land Use Data ........................................................................................... 6 Table 4. Scenario 1 Trip Generation Data .................................................................................. 7 Table 5. Scenario 2 Trip Generation Data .................................................................................. 7 Table 6. Scenario 3 Trip Generation Data .................................................................................. 7 Table 7. Site Generated Trips – Mission Ranch Development ..................................................12 Table 8. Site Generated Trips – Pershing Pointe Development .................................................12 Table 9. Site Generated Trips – Aggieland Xpress ....................................................................13 Table 10. Site Generated Trips – University Heights Phase 4 ...................................................13 Table 11. Site Generated Trips – River Bend Elementary School .............................................13 Table 12. AM Peak Hour Level of Service .................................................................................22 Table 13. PM Peak Hour Level of Service .................................................................................23 Table 14. Signal Warrant Analysis Using Peak Hour Volumes ..................................................24 Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 1 INTRODUCTION The Butler Tract in College Station contains approximately 43 acres of land located along Holleman Drive South near General Parkway. It is proposed that 16.9 acres be rezoned for development. The original zoning is Rural; the proposed zoning is General Commercial. An aerial map with the location of the development is shown in Figure 1. A survey of the specific location is provided in the Appendix. This traffic impact analysis (TIA) evaluates the traffic impacts of three development scenarios. The first scenario is a full development using retail assumptions consistent with General Commercial uses in the City ordinance. The second scenario allocates most of the developed area to a Big Shots golf facility, with the remaining area still designated and used as general commercial. The third scenario includes the Big Shots golf facility and applies a reduced intensity of development for the remaining land. The impacts of these three scenarios are evaluated at key intersections along the Holleman Drive South Corridor. The following conditions are included: • Existing (2018) • Background (2021) • Full Build Scenario 1 (2021) • Full Build Scenario 2 (2021) • Full Build Scenario 3 (2021) STUDY AREA Provided below are a summary of the existing land uses near the site and descriptions of developments in the area. AREA DEVELOPMENT Aspen Heights is a recently-completed complex at the General Parkway intersection and has a total of 233 units, with each unit having 2-5 bedrooms. Along Deacon Drive is The Barracks, a development nearing completion that includes detached houses and townhouses. Mission Ranch is a planned subdivision located west of Holleman Drive with approximately 540 single- family homes. Adjacent to Mission Ranch and at the corner of Rock Prairie Road at Holleman Drive is a planned elementary school. Pershing Pointe is a development near the intersection of Deacon Drive at Holleman Drive that will have 175 townhomes after two phases of construction. A gas station and convenience store (Aggieland Xpress) is planned for the northeast corner of the Deacon Drive intersection. Finally, future phases of University Heights may add some commercial development, such as a convenience store and fast food. The locations of these developments are shown in Figure 2. STREETS AND INTERSECTIONS Holleman Drive is an existing two-lane roadway with a posted speed limit of 60 mph. Holleman Drive is classified as a four-lane Minor Arterial on the city’s Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP). The City is in the process of widening Holleman Drive from Dowling Road to Rock Prairie Road, to a cross-section that has four lanes (two in each direction). There will be a two-way left-turn lane from Deacon Drive to General Parkway. After the road is widened, the speed limit is expected to be 40 mph. Market Street is listed as a proposed two-lane Major Collector on the MTP. The road intersects Holleman Drive in a T-intersection controlled by a traffic signal. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 2 Dowling Road is a two-lane rural street with a speed limit of 45 mph. The intersection of Dowling Road at Holleman Drive is controlled by Stop signs for all directions. A northbound channelized right-turn lane has been recently added to reduce delay at the intersection. General Parkway is a two-lane Minor Collector that has not been fully constructed. On the north end, General Parkway intersects Holleman Drive in a T-intersection and terminates just after the Aspen Heights development, at the Butler Tract. Cain Road is a two-lane undivided roadway with a 40 mph speed limit. Cain Road currently extends from Holleman Drive South to Wellborn Road. Cain Road is currently classified as a two-lane Minor Collector from General Parkway to Holleman Drive. The eastbound approach of Cain Road at Wellborn Road is in the process of being removed as part of a project to eliminate the at-grade railroad crossing. Deacon Drive is a two-lane Major Collector extending from Holleman Drive South to Old Wellborn Road. The speed limit is 30 mph. The City is in the process of connecting Deacon Drive over the Union Pacific Railroad to Wellborn Road. With the Mission Ranch development, Deacon Drive will also extend west of Holleman Drive as a Minor Collector. The existing and proposed intersections evaluated in this study are as follows: • Holleman Drive at Market Street • Holleman Drive at Dowling Road • Holleman Drive at General Parkway • Holleman Drive at Cain Road • Holleman Drive at Deacon Drive AM and PM Peak Hour turning movement traffic counts were collected on Holleman Drive at each intersection in March 2018. The raw traffic count volume printouts are provided in the Appendix. The AM and PM Peak Hour volumes for the Existing (2018) conditions are illustrated in Figure 3. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 6 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT This report addresses the development of 16.9 acres of the Butler Tract. For the rezoning of the land from Rural (R) to General Commercial (GC), the City of College Station requires that specific development assumptions be used in the analysis. Because the ultimate use of the land at this location will likely be much less intense than the required assumptions, the Full Build condition was analyzed with three different scenarios: • Scenario 1 includes development of the 16.9 acres as General Commercial use with trip generation assumptions consistent with City of College Station guidelines. This includes the ratio of 13,500 square feet of building space per acre of land and trip generation assumptions for ITE Land Use 820 (Shopping Center). Table 1 identifies the relevant land use data consulted in determining the number of trips generated for Scenario 1. • Scenario 2 includes a Big Shots golf facility on most of the available land, as shown in the Appendix. The remaining land would be developed with General Commercial use. A Big Shots facility contains a driving range with indoor tees. It was assumed the building would be sized at 32,000 sq ft, consistent with a mid-sized Big Shots development. A 32,000 sq ft Big Shots facility has 42 tee boxes. Table 2 identifies the land use data for determining the number of trips generated under Scenario 2. • Scenario 3 presents a more likely example of the intensity of commercial development that may happen with the available land next to Big Shots. The retail assumptions for ITE land use 820 (Shopping Center) are conservative and represent trip generation rates for shopping centers and malls, including regional centers with multiple uses. Such facilities are located on major and minor arterials. It is unknown how the remaining 3.2 acres on General Parkway will actually develop, but an intense retail use is not likely because there is no direct access to a major arterial (there will be no access to Wellborn Road over the railroad). Scenario 3 therefore incorporates the Big Shots design and applies a 30% reduction to the number of other General Commercial trips for a more- realistic forecast. Table 3 shows the land use data for Scenario 3. Table 1. Scenario 1 Land Use Data Land Use ITE Code Acres Units/ Acre Number of Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate/Unit Trips Rate/Unit Trips Commercial 820 16.9 13.5 KSF 228 0.94 214 3.81 869 Table 2. Scenario 2 Land Use Data Land Use ITE Code Acres Units/ Acre Number of Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate/Unit Trips Rate/Unit Trips Big Shots Golf1 435 13.7 — 32 KSF 0.60 19 3.58 115 Commercial 820 3.2 13.5 KSF 43.2 KSF 0.94 41 3.81 165 1 ITE Land Use 435 does not include AM trip generation data. The AM assumptions for this study are based on information from similar recreational land uses. Table 3. Scenario 3 Land Use Data Land Use ITE Code Acres Units/ Acre Number of Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate/Unit Trips Rate/Unit Trips Big Shots Golf1 435 13.7 — 32 KSF 0.60 19 3.58 115 Commercial2 820 3.2 13.5 KSF 43.2 KSF 0.47 20 1.91 83 1 ITE Land Use 435 does not include AM trip generation data. The AM assumptions for this study are based on information from similar recreational land uses. 2 The trip generation rates for this scenario have been reduced by 50% from the original rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation manual. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 7 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Trips generated by the proposed development addressed in this study were distributed to and from the site based on its location with respect to area development, nearby roadways, and existing traffic patterns. Figure 4 illustrates the trip distribution utilized in the study. TRIP GENERATION For the three development scenarios, the AM and PM Peak Hour trips are determined from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) 10th edition Trip Generation Manual. Tables 4 through 6 summarize the calculated trips that are anticipated to be generated by the different uses. The Appendix contains information about the ITE data used to develop these tables. A Big Shots facility would occupy most of the 16.9 acres of the rezoned land. The location of the land, the dedication of right-of-way to the extension of General Parkway, and the need for storm water detention, the remaining land that can be developed other than the Big Shots facility is approximately 3.2 acres. Because the retail assumption of Land Use 820 is extremely conservative compared to what would likely develop at that location, Scenario 3 reduces the commercial-based trips of Scenario 2 by 30%. Table 6 has trip generation data for Scenario 3. Table 4. Scenario 1 Trip Generation Data Land Use AM Peak (vph) PM Peak (vph) Total % Enter Enter % Exit Exit Total % Enter Enter % Exit Exit Commercial 214 62% 133 38% 81 869 48% 417 52% 452 Table 5. Scenario 2 Trip Generation Data Land Use AM Peak (vph) PM Peak (vph) Total % Enter Enter % Exit Exit Total % Enter Enter % Exit Exit Big Shots Golf1 19 70% 13 30% 6 115 55% 63 45% 52 Commercial 41 62% 25 38% 16 165 48% 79 52% 86 Total 60 — 38 — 22 280 — 142 — 138 1 ITE Land Use 435 does not include AM trip generation data. The AM assumptions for this study are based on information from similar recreational land uses. Table 6. Scenario 3 Trip Generation Data Land Use AM Peak (vph) PM Peak (vph) Total % Enter Enter % Exit Exit Total % Enter Enter % Exit Exit Big Shots Golf1 19 70% 13 30% 6 115 55% 63 45% 52 Commercial2 20 62% 12 38% 8 83 48% 40 52% 43 Total 39 — 25 — 14 198 — 103 — 95 1 ITE Land Use 435 does not include AM trip generation data. The AM assumptions for this study are based on information from similar recreational land uses. 2 The intensity of the Commercial development (Land Use 820) has been reduced by 50%. PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES SITE TRAFFIC VOLUMES For this study, “site volumes” represent the traffic expected to be generated by the proposed site. Figure 5 shows the assignment of the generated trips for Scenario 1 based on the trip distribution shown in Figure 4. Figure 6 shows the generated trips for Scenario 2. Figure 7 shows the generated trips for Scenario 3. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 12 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES For this study, “background volumes” represent the traffic expected to occur along the area streets and roadways from the increase in traffic volumes due to normal traffic growth in the area. This study applied an annual growth factor of 2%. Figure 8 shows the background Peak Hour volumes after applying the 2% annual growth of the Existing (2018) volumes through 2021. As mentioned previously, there are some developments that are nearing completion or are under construction. These include: The Barracks, Mission Ranch, Pershing Pointe townhomes, Aggieland Xpress gas station, University Heights, and River Bend Elementary School. Because the Barracks development is nearing completion, the additional traffic from the final units will be covered by the annual 2% growth factor. The generation and distribution of trips for the other developments added to the background volumes are discussed in this section. Trip generation rates are based on information in the ITE Trip Generation Manual or from TIAs specific to the development. Mission Ranch The size of the Mission Ranch development is approximately 270 acres. It is anticipated to have approximately 540 single family units after the last phase of development. In 2021, the target year for the Background and Full Build scenarios of this study, it is estimated that Mission Ranch will be developed to 25% completion (135 units). Table 7 provides a summary of the estimated trips generated by 135 completed homes in Mission Ranch. These trips were added to the study intersections with the distribution illustrated in the Appendix. Table 7. Site Generated Trips – Mission Ranch Development Development AM Peak Hour (vph) PM Peak Hour (vph) Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Mission Ranch 101 25 76 135 85 50 Note: Represents 25% of full build conditions Pershing Pointe Townhomes The Pershing Pointe Townhomes, located near the southeast corner of Deacon Drive at Holleman Drive, is a complex that will have 175 units. The calculated number of trips generated by the townhome development for the AM and PM Peak Hours are summarized in Table 8. A raised median on Holleman Drive will limit access for Pershing Pointe to right-in, right-out on Holleman Drive. Full access to the development will be provided through Towers Parkway at Deacon Drive. The trip distribution assumptions for Pershing Pointe are shown in the Appendix. Table 8. Site Generated Trips – Pershing Pointe Development Development AM Peak Hour (vph) PM Peak Hour (vph) Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Pershing Pointe 77 13 64 91 61 30 Aggieland Xpress The Aggieland Xpress convenience store and gas station will be located on the northeast corner of Deacon Drive at Holleman Drive. The gas station will have 10 pumps, and there will be a 7,500-square foot building for a convenience store and adjacent retail space. Trips generated by the Aggieland Xpress development are summarized in Table 9. Both accesses for the convenience store and gas station on Deacon Drive and on Holleman Drive are limited to right- in, right-out, impacting the trip distribution shown in the Appendix. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 13 Table 9. Site Generated Trips – Aggieland Xpress Development Intensity AM Peak Hour (vph) PM Peak Hour (vph) Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Aggieland Xpress 10 Gas Pumps1 102 51 51 135 68 67 2,200 SF Retail 15 9 6 46 22 24 Note: 14,800 SF Convenience store included as part of ITE Land Use 945 (Gasoline/Service Station w/Convenience Market) University Heights University Heights has recently been rezoned to allow for some commercial development, with one potential use being a convenience store and fast food restaurant. The calculated trip ends generated by the development are summarized in Table 10. The trip distribution is shown in the Appendix. Table 10. Site Generated Trips – University Heights Phase 4 Development AM Peak Hour (vph) PM Peak Hour (vph) Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit University Heights 65 40 25 264 127 137 River Bend Elementary School A traffic study completed by Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. (KHA) provided the trip generation and distribution assumptions for the elementary school (River Bend Elementary) located at the intersection of Rock Prairie Road at Holleman Drive. Table 11 summarizes the estimated trips generated by River Bend Elementary School. The trips added to the study intersections by the school in accordance with the TIA for the school are shown in the Appendix. Table 11. Site Generated Trips – River Bend Elementary School Development Intensity AM Peak Hour (vph) PM Peak Hour (vph) Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit River Bend Elementary 700 Students 630 347 283 420 197 223 80 Staff 80 80 0 80 0 80 Source: Kimley-Horn & Associates TIA for River Bend Elementary Figure 9 depicts the trips added to the network from the combined local developments listed in this section. Figure 10 shows the combined Peak Hour volumes for the Background (2021) conditions, which extrapolate the Existing (2018) traffic to the year 2021 with a 2% growth factor (shown in Figure 8) and adding the site traffic of the specific local developments (shown in Figure 9). TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES. The Peak Hour volumes for the Full Build (2021) scenario are determined by adding the site generated volumes of the proposed site (Figure 5 for Scenario 1, Figure 6 for Scenario 2, and Figure 7 for Scenario 3) to the total Background (2021) volumes (shown in Figure 10). The total Full Build volumes for Scenario 1 are shown in Figure 11. For Scenario 2 and Scenario 3, the total volumes are shown in Figures 12 and 13, respectively. There are no reductions for internal trip capture or pass-by trips, despite the possibility for there to be some with commercial uses. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 20 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Level of Service (LOS) analyses of the traffic operations were performed at the study intersections. Each analysis was conducted utilizing Synchro software for the AM and PM Peak Hours. For each scenario, including the Existing (2018) conditions, it was assumed that the Holleman Drive corridor was built to its ultimate four-lane configuration from the current widening project. Mitigations for poor and failing levels of service were proposed as necessary. The findings of the analyses with the resulting delay and levels of service are summarized in the following tables: • Table 12. AM Peak Hour Level of Service • Table 13. PM Peak Hour Level of Service Observations from the analyzed scenarios are described below. EXISTING (2018) The lane configurations for Holleman Drive matched the four-lane design of the road currently under construction. For the Existing (2018) scenario, all intersections operate at an acceptable level of service. BACKGROUND (2021) The Background (2021) analysis assumed a 2% annual growth in traffic and the addition of traffic generated from nearby developments. During the AM and PM Peak Hours, the eastbound and westbound left-turns from Deacon Drive are forecasted to operate at LOS E or LOS F. While the AM Peak Hour is not as severe, the average delay for the eastbound left-turn is 145 seconds per vehicle in the PM Peak Hour. The worst vehicle queues (95th percentile) are approximately 3 vehicles or less. SCENARIO 1 FULL BUILD (2021) Scenario 1 includes site traffic with an assumption for 100% commercial (retail) development. During the AM Peak Hour, there are some movements with unacceptable levels of service, including the westbound left turn from General Parkway and the westbound and eastbound left turns from Deacon Drive. The vehicle queues at these locations are generally short. During the PM Peak Hour there are operational concerns at Dowling Road, at General Parkway, and at Deacon Drive. The intersection at Dowling Road is forecasted to operate at LOS F, with failing levels of service in the northbound and southbound directions. At General Parkway, the westbound approach fails due to the high left-turning volume. Deacon Drive experiences significant failings in level of service for the eastbound and westbound approaches. SCENARIO 2 FULL BUILD (2021) Scenario 2 includes site traffic from the combination of the Big Shots golf facility and some commercial development (3.2 acres). There are significantly fewer trips generated with development of the Big Shots compared to the typical General Commercial assumptions. As expected, the analyses of Scenario 2 show that the intersections perform better than in Scenario 1. During the AM Peak Hour, all intersections operate at an acceptable level of service, except for left-turn concerns from Deacon Drive that exist in the Background conditions. During the PM Peak Hour, operations at Dowling Road improve to LOS E, and only the southbound approach operates with a failing level of service. At General Parkway, the westbound left-turn still operates with an unacceptable level of service (LOS E). Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 21 SCENARIO 3 FULL BUILD (2021) In Scenario 2, the main operational concerns are during the PM Peak Hour at Dowling Road and at General Parkway. For Scenario 3, the intersection at Dowling Road improves to an acceptable level of service (LOS D) during the PM Peak Hour, although the southbound movement continues to operate at LOS E. At General Parkway, the westbound left-turn movement improves to LOS D, with 33 seconds of delay. Deacon Drive continues to experience operational concerns in the AM and PM Peak Hours with failing of unacceptable levels of service in the Eastbound and Westbound directions. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 22 Table 12. AM Peak Hour Level of Service Scenario Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound INT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Market Street at Holleman Drive Existing 2018 E - A B C 61.9 - 5.7 14.7 21.5 Background 2021 E - A B C 70.5 - 6.4 16.4 20.9 Scenario 1 E - A B C 70.5 - 6.6 17.1 20.5 Scenario 2 E - A B C 70.5 - 6.5 16.5 20.7 Scenario 3 E - A B C 70.5 - 6.4 16.5 20.8 Dowling Road at Holleman Drive Existing 2018 B A B B B B 13.9 9.5 12.0 12.0 10.5 12.1 Background 2021 C B C B B C 19.0 11.2 22.6 14.2 14.7 19.2 Scenario 1 C B D B C C 21.4 12.1 31.8 14.4 18.1 24.8 Scenario 2 C B D B C C 19.5 11.4 24.3 14.3 15.4 20.3 Scenario 3 C B C B C C 19.4 11.3 23.7 14.3 15.2 19.9 General Parkway at Holleman Drive Existing 2018 - C - B - A - - - 16.3 - 12.3 - 9.6 - - Background 2021 - C - C - B - - - 24.0 - 15.8 - 11.6 - - Scenario 1 - E - C - B - - - 40.8 - 19.2 - 13.6 - - Scenario 2 - D - C - B - - - 27.1 - 16.5 - 12.1 - - Scenario 3 D - B - B - - 26.0 - 16.3 - 11.9 - - Cain Road at Holleman Drive Existing 2018 - B - A - - - 11.1 - 8.9 - - Background 2021 - B - B - - - 14.0 - 10.5 - - Scenario 1 - B - B - - - 14.5 - 10.8 - - Scenario 2 - B - B - - - 14.1 - 10.6 - - Scenario 3 B - B - - 14.0 - 10.6 - - Deacon Drive at Holleman Drive Existing 2018 - B - B - A - - - 13.7 - 11.7 - 8.4 - - Background 2021 F C E C A - B - - 54.9 22.6 37.4 19.9 7.9 - 10.6 - - Scenario 1 F D E C A - B - - 80.4 25.3 45.2 22.8 7.9 - 10.8 - - Scenario 2 F C E C A - B - - 63.4 23.8 43.5 20.8 7.9 - 10.6 - - Scenario 3 F C E C A - B - - 61.6 23.6 43.1 20.5 7.9 - 10.6 - - Note: Letters are level of service, numbers are average seconds of delay per vehicle. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 23 Table 13. PM Peak Hour Level of Service Scenario Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound INT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Market Street at Holleman Drive Existing 2018 D - A B C 53.6 - 5.4 18.0 20.3 Background 2021 E - A C C 59.7 - 5.9 22.0 21.8 Scenario 1 E - A C C 59.7 - 5.7 29.2 26.5 Scenario 2 E - A C C 59.7 - 6.1 23.7 22.2 Scenario 3 E - A C C 59.7 - 6.0 23.1 22.0 Dowling Road at Holleman Drive Existing 2018 B B B A B B 12.8 10.1 11.6 8.9 14.5 13.3 Background 2021 C B C A D D 16.1 12.2 18.0 9.3 33.9 25.8 Scenario 1 C B E A F F 18.6 14.6 55.5 9.6 122 82.7 Scenario 2 C B C A F E 17.2 13.0 23.9 9.4 53.3 37.8 Scenario 3 C B C A E D 17.0 12.8 21.5 9.4 45.9 33.2 General Parkway at Holleman Drive Existing 2018 - C - B - A - - - 15.0 - 10.1 - 8.6 - - Background 2021 - C - B - A - - - 20.3 - 11.4 - 9.6 - - Scenario 1 - F - D - B - - - >300 - 25.2 - 14.8 - - Scenario 2 - E - B - B - - - 46.1 - 13.2 - 10.7 - - Scenario 3 - D - B - B - - - 32.8 - 12.5 - 10.3 - - Cain Road at Holleman Drive Existing 2018 - B - A - - - 10.2 - 7.9 - - Background 2021 - B - A - - - 12.3 - 8.8 - - Scenario 1 - B - A - - - 13.7 - 9.4 - - Scenario 2 - B - A - - - 12.7 - 9.0 - - Scenario 3 - B - A - - - 12.6 - 9.0 - - Deacon Drive at Holleman Drive Existing 2018 - B - A - A - - - 14.4 - 9.3 - 7.9 - - Background 2021 F D E C A - A - - 145 31.4 48.8 23.2 8.6 - 8.6 - - Scenario 1 F F F F A - A - - >300 57.3 130 61.7 8.9 - 9.8 - - Scenario 2 F E F D A - A - - 244 37.0 72.6 28.4 8.7 - 9.1 - - Scenario 3 F E F D A - A - - 235 37.0 71.5 28.2 8.6 - 9.2 - - Notes: Letters are level of service, numbers are average seconds of delay per vehicle. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 24 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The capacity analyses forecasted poor or failing operations at Deacon Drive during the Background (2021) period that occur regardless of the development of the Butler Tract. These failings can be mitigated with a traffic signal; however, a signal is not currently planned at that location. A pseudo-analysis for a signal warrant is shown below in Table 14. The analysis is based on Peak Hour volumes only, identifying the scenarios for which the AM or PM Peak Hour volumes exceed the stated threshold of the volume warrants. The Warrant 1 and Warrant 2 volumes are exceeded starting in the Background 2021 scenario. This does not substitute for a full signal warrant analysis but suggests that there may be warranted in the future and the location should be monitored for signalization. With Scenario 1, representing full development with General Commercial retail assumptions, there are significant operational failings at Dowling Road and at General Parkway. Mitigation with traffic signals was not pursued at these locations, but with less intense trip generation assumptions of Scenario 2. Scenario 2 evaluated the impact of a Big Shots golf facility with some commercial (retail) development. The impacts under Scenario 2 are much smaller than the impacts for Scenario 1, though there are still some undesirable levels of service. In Scenario 3, these issues are mitigated with the further reductions in trips generated. Table 14. Signal Warrant Analysis Using Peak Hour Volumes Summary Warrant 1 Warrant 2 Warrant 3 AM PM AM PM AM PM Existing 2018 No No No No No No Background 2021 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Scenario 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Scenario 2 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Scenario 3 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Note: Warrant analysis based on Peak Hour volumes only, not the full 8-hour or 4-hour evaluations used for Warrant 1 and Warrant 2. RECOMMENDATIONS Unless further mitigations are pursued, such as signalization at General Parkway or at Dowling Road, and until General Parkway is extended to Deacon Drive, it is recommended that development be limited to generating no more trips than what are shown in Scenario 3. CONCLUSION The analyses conducted in this study were based upon assumptions for specific types and intensities of development to evaluate how intersections around the proposed development of the Butler Tract will operate under future conditions. It is likely that actual development along the Holleman Drive South corridor will differ from the assumptions of this TIA, causing the intersections to perform differently than shown in the report. If there are any questions concerning this report or its analyses, please contact our office. Traffic Impact Analysis – Butler Tract Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 25 APPENDIX SITE SURVEY...................................................................................................................... 1 PAGE BIG SHOTS GOLF EXHIBIT ................................................................................................... 1 PAGE TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY SHEETS .................................................................................20 PAGES DIAGRAMS OF TRIP DISTRIBUTIONS FOR LOCAL DEVELOPMENTS ........................................ 5 PAGES ITE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY AND LAND USE DETAILS ................................................ 5 PAGES SYNCHRO ANALYSIS OUTPUT Existing (2018) ................................................................................................................ 6 PAGES Background (2021) ......................................................................................................... 6 PAGES Scenario 1 Full Build (2021) ............................................................................................ 6 PAGES Scenario 2 Full Build (2021) ............................................................................................ 6 PAGES Scenario 3 Full Build (2021) ............................................................................................ 6 PAGES DESCRIPTIONS OF LEVELS OF SERVICE ............................................................................... 1 PAGE HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTHG E N E R A L P A R KW A Y CALLED OLD HIGHWAY 6 R.O.W.TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: ZONING MAP BUTLER TRACT COMMERCIAL 16.934 ACRES CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, A-7 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SURVEYOR: H. Curtis Strong, RPLS No. 4961 Strong Surveying, LLC 1722 Broadmoor Dr, Ste 105 Bryan, TX 77802 (979) 776-9836 SCALE: AS SHOWN APRIL 2018 OWNER/DEVELOPER: J&J BUTLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LTD 6010 Thoroughbred RDG College Station, TX 77845 VICINITY MAP HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY S.WE L L B O R N R D .HOLLEMAN DR . S . NOT TO SCALE GENERAL PARKWAY 1 2 3 7 6 9 8 40 YDS.80 YDS.125 YDS.160 YDS.225 YDS.105 YDS.180 YDS.4 5DNDN 10 11 BUTLER TRACT DEVELOPMENT HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTH COLLEGE STATION, TX 911 Southwest Pkwy E. College Station, TX 77840 979.764.3900 TBPE NO. 12327 SITE & ADJACENT PROPERTY EXHIBIT W/ AERIAL D Market St & Holleman Dr - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 AM Peak (7AM - 8AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499661, Location: 30.58457, -96.336372 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Leg Holleman Dr Holleman Dr Market St Direction Southbound Northbound Eastbound Time T R U App Ped*L T U App Ped*L R U App Ped*Int 2018-03-01 7:00AM 52 4 0 56 6 2 100 0 102 2 48 2 0 50 0 208 7:15AM 49 7 0 56 1 2 118 0 120 5 74 6 0 80 0 256 7:30AM 51 5 0 56 7 2 150 0 152 1 68 3 0 71 0 279 7:45AM 77 6 0 83 0 1 98 0 99 0 24 2 0 26 0 208 Total 229 22 0 251 14 7 466 0 4 73 8 214 13 0 227 0 951 % Approach 91.2% 8.8% 0%--1.5% 98.5% 0%--94.3% 5.7% 0%--- % Total 24.1% 2.3% 0%26.4 %-0.7% 49.0% 0%4 9.7%-22.5% 1.4% 0%23.9%-- PHF 0.744 0.786 -0.756 -0.875 0.777 -0.778 -0.723 0.542 -0.709 -0.852 Lights 209 22 0 231 -7 455 0 4 62 -214 13 0 227 -920 % Lights 91.3% 100% 0%92.0%-100% 97.6% 0%97.7%-100% 100% 0%100%-96.7% Articulated Trucks 1 0 0 1 -0 1 0 1 -0 0 0 0 -2 % Articulated Trucks 0.4% 0% 0%0.4 %-0% 0.2% 0%0.2%-0% 0% 0%0%-0.2% Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 19 0 0 19 -0 10 0 10 -0 0 0 0 -29 % Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 8.3% 0% 0%7.6%-0% 2.1% 0%2.1%-0% 0% 0%0%-3.0% Pedestrians - - - - 14 - - - - 8 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - 100% - - - - 100% - - - - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 6 Market St & Holleman Dr - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 AM Peak (7AM - 8AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499661, Location: 30.58457, -96.336372 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US [N] Holleman Dr [S] Holleman Dr[W] Market StTotal: 931 Total: 715Total: 256Out: 680 Out: 242Out: 29In: 251 In: 473In: 227 229 466 22 7 214 13 14 8 4 of 6 Market St & Holleman Dr - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499661, Location: 30.58457, -96.336372 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Leg Holleman Dr Holleman Dr Market St Direction Southbound Northbound Eastbound Time T R U App Ped*L T U App Ped*L R U App Ped*Int 2018-03-01 5:00PM 128 27 0 155 2 4 118 0 122 1 68 7 0 75 0 352 5:15PM 143 31 0 174 0 7 91 0 98 3 48 9 0 57 0 329 5:30PM 146 31 0 177 0 3 97 0 100 1 48 3 0 51 0 328 5:45PM 140 37 0 177 0 8 105 0 113 0 54 2 0 56 0 34 6 Total 557 126 0 683 2 22 411 0 4 33 5 218 21 0 239 0 1355 % Approach 81.6% 18.4% 0%--5.1% 94.9% 0%--91.2% 8.8% 0%--- % Total 41.1% 9.3% 0%50.4 %-1.6% 30.3% 0%32.0%-16.1% 1.5% 0%17.6%-- PHF 0.954 0.851 -0.965 -0.688 0.871 -0.887 -0.801 0.583 -0.797 -0.962 Lights 554 126 0 680 -22 406 0 4 28 -218 21 0 239 -1347 % Lights 99.5% 100% 0%99.6%-100% 98.8% 0%98.8%-100% 100% 0%100%-99.4% Articulated Trucks 1 0 0 1 -0 1 0 1 -0 0 0 0 -2 % Articulated Trucks 0.2% 0% 0%0.1%-0% 0.2% 0%0.2%-0% 0% 0%0%-0.1% Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 2 0 0 2 -0 4 0 4 -0 0 0 0 -6 % Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 0.4% 0% 0%0.3%-0% 1.0% 0%0.9%-0% 0% 0%0%-0.4% Pedestrians - - - - 2 - - - - 5 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - 100% - - - - 100% - - - - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 6 Market St & Holleman Dr - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499661, Location: 30.58457, -96.336372 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US [N] Holleman Dr [S] Holleman Dr[W] Market StTotal: 1312 Total: 1011Total: 387Out: 629 Out: 578Out: 148In: 683 In: 433In: 239 557 411 126 22 218 21 2 5 6 of 6 Holleman Dr & N Dowling Rd - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 AM Peak (7AM - 8AM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 499660, Location: 30.584237, -96.331858 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Leg Holleman Dr N Dowling Rd Holleman Dr N Dowling Rd Direction Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Time L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*Int 2018-03-01 7:00AM 4 36 18 0 58 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 8 69 55 0 132 0 28 10 4 0 4 2 0 233 7:15AM 4 32 22 0 58 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 10 90 132 0 232 0 28 33 5 0 66 0 357 7:30AM 4 31 15 0 50 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 7 92 135 0 234 0 49 28 8 0 85 0 371 7:45AM 4 54 21 0 79 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 11 60 67 0 138 0 30 22 9 0 61 0 279 Total 16 153 76 0 24 5 0 3 1 1 0 5 0 36 311 389 0 736 0 135 93 26 0 254 0 124 0 % Approach 6.5% 62.4% 31.0% 0%--60.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0%--4.9% 42.3% 52.9% 0%--53.1% 36.6% 10.2% 0%--- % Total 1.3% 12.3% 6.1% 0%19.8%-0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0%0.4 %-2.9% 25.1% 31.4% 0%59.4 %-10.9% 7.5% 2.1% 0%20.5%-- PHF 1.000 0.708 0.864 -0.775 -0.750 0.250 0.250 -0.625 -0.818 0.845 0.720 -0.786 -0.689 0.705 0.722 -0.74 7 -0.836 Lights 16 139 69 0 224 -3 1 1 0 5 -36 301 389 0 726 -134 93 22 0 24 9 -1204 % Lights 100% 90.8% 90.8% 0%91.4 %-100% 100% 100% 0%100%-100% 96.8% 100% 0%98.6%-99.3% 100% 84.6% 0%98.0%-97.1% Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 1 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 1 0 0 1 -0 0 0 0 0 -2 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.7% 0% 0%0.4 %-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-0% 0.3% 0% 0%0.1%-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-0.2% Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 0 13 7 0 20 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 9 0 0 9 -1 0 4 0 5 -34 % Buses and Single- Unit Trucks 0% 8.5% 9.2% 0%8.2%-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-0% 2.9% 0% 0%1.2%-0.7% 0% 15.4% 0%2.0 %-2 .7% Pedestrians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 6 Holleman Dr & N Dowling Rd - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 AM Peak (7AM - 8AM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 499660, Location: 30.584237, -96.331858 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US [N] Holleman Dr [E] N Dowling Rd[S] Holleman Dr[W] N Dowling RdTotal: 692 Total: 918 Total: 503Total: 367Out: 447 Out: 182 Out: 498Out: 113In: 245 In: 736 In: 5In: 254 153 1 311 93 16 76 1 3 389 36 135 26 4 of 6 Holleman Dr & N Dowling Rd - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 499660, Location: 30.584237, -96.331858 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Leg Holleman Dr N Dowling Rd Holleman Dr N Dowling Rd Direction Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Time L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*Int 2018-03-01 5:00PM 3 112 23 0 138 0 6 0 1 0 7 0 11 75 32 0 118 0 42 7 15 0 64 0 327 5:15PM 0 117 25 0 14 2 0 5 1 3 0 9 0 11 51 24 0 86 0 26 9 11 0 4 6 0 283 5:30PM 1 130 26 0 157 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 8 60 21 0 89 0 29 7 9 0 4 5 0 299 5:45PM 1 122 22 0 14 5 0 3 2 3 0 8 0 9 75 33 0 117 0 31 4 9 0 4 4 0 314 Total 5 481 96 0 582 0 18 3 11 0 32 0 39 261 110 0 4 10 0 128 27 44 0 199 0 1223 % Approach 0.9% 82.6% 16.5% 0%--56.3% 9.4% 34.4% 0%--9.5% 63.7% 26.8% 0%--64.3% 13.6% 22.1% 0%--- % Total 0.4% 39.3% 7.8% 0%4 7.6%-1.5% 0.2% 0.9% 0%2.6%-3.2% 21.3% 9.0% 0%33.5%-10.5% 2.2% 3.6% 0%16.3%-- PHF 0.417 0.925 0.923 -0.927 -0.750 0.375 0.688 -0.889 -0.886 0.870 0.833 -0.869 -0.762 0.750 0.733 -0.777 -0.935 Lights 5 480 95 0 580 -18 3 11 0 32 -39 256 110 0 4 05 -127 27 39 0 193 -1210 % Lights 100% 99.8% 99.0% 0%99.7%-100% 100% 100% 0%100%-100% 98.1% 100% 0%98.8%-99.2% 100% 88.6% 0%97.0%-98.9% Articulated Trucks 0 0 1 0 1 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 -2 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 1.0% 0%0.2%-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-0.8% 0% 0% 0%0.5%-0.2% Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 0 1 0 0 1 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 5 0 0 5 -0 0 5 0 5 -11 % Buses and Single- Unit Trucks 0% 0.2% 0% 0%0.2%-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-0% 1.9% 0% 0%1.2%-0% 0% 11.4% 0%2.5 %-0 .9% Pedestrians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 6 Holleman Dr & N Dowling Rd - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 499660, Location: 30.584237, -96.331858 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US [N] Holleman Dr [E] N Dowling Rd[S] Holleman Dr[W] N Dowling RdTotal: 982 Total: 953 Total: 174Total: 337Out: 400 Out: 543 Out: 142Out: 138In: 582 In: 410 In: 32In: 199 481 3 261 27 5 96 11 18 110 39 128 44 6 of 6 Holleman Dr at General Pkwy - TMC Tue Mar 6, 2018 AM Peak (7AM - 8AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 500335, Location: 30.581067, -96.330254 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Leg Holleman Dr General Pkwy Holleman Dr Direction Southbound Westbound Northbound Time L T U App Ped*L R U App Ped*T R U App Ped*Int 2018-03-06 7:00AM 2 39 0 4 1 0 1 13 0 14 0 99 2 0 101 0 156 7:15AM 4 41 0 4 5 0 2 25 0 27 0 214 1 0 215 0 287 7:30AM 1 39 0 4 0 0 2 22 0 24 0 224 3 0 227 0 291 7:45AM 8 54 0 62 0 2 21 0 23 0 142 1 0 14 3 0 228 Total 15 173 0 188 0 7 81 0 88 0 679 7 0 686 0 962 % Approach 8.0% 92.0% 0%--8.0% 92.0% 0%--99.0% 1.0% 0%--- % Total 1.6% 18.0% 0%19.5%-0.7% 8.4% 0%9.1%-70.6% 0.7% 0%71.3%-- PHF 0.469 0.801 -0.758 -0.875 0.810 -0.815 -0.758 0.583 -0.756 -0.826 Lights 15 162 0 177 -7 76 0 83 -675 2 0 677 -937 % Lights 100% 93.6% 0%94 .1%-100% 93.8% 0%94 .3%-99.4% 28.6% 0%98.7%-97.4% Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 1 -0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 1 -2 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.6% 0%0.5%-0% 0% 0%0%-0.1% 0% 0%0.1%-0.2% Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 0 10 0 10 -0 5 0 5 -3 5 0 8 -23 % Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 0% 5.8% 0%5.3%-0% 6.2% 0%5.7%-0.4% 71.4% 0%1.2%-2.4% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 6 Holleman Dr at General Pkwy - TMC Tue Mar 6, 2018 AM Peak (7AM - 8AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 500335, Location: 30.581067, -96.330254 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US [N] Holleman Dr [E] General Pkwy[S] Holleman Dr Total: 948 Total: 866 Total: 110Out: 760 Out: 180 Out: 22In: 188 In: 686 In: 88 173 679 15 81 7 74 of 6 Holleman Dr at General Pkwy - TMC Tue Mar 6, 2018 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 500335, Location: 30.581067, -96.330254 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Leg Holleman Dr General Pkwy Holleman Dr Direction Southbound Westbound Northbound Time L T U App Ped*L R U App Ped*T R U App Ped*Int 2018-03-06 5:00PM 13 102 0 115 0 5 16 0 21 0 103 6 0 109 0 24 5 5:15PM 14 102 0 116 0 3 14 0 17 0 86 6 0 92 0 225 5:30PM 23 117 0 14 0 0 3 12 0 15 0 116 6 0 122 0 277 5:45PM 27 112 0 139 0 6 14 0 20 0 80 11 0 91 0 250 Total 77 433 0 510 0 17 56 0 73 0 385 29 0 4 14 0 997 % Approach 15.1% 84.9% 0%--23.3% 76.7% 0%--93.0% 7.0% 0%--- % Total 7.7% 43.4% 0%51.2%-1.7% 5.6% 0%7.3%-38.6% 2.9% 0%4 1.5%-- PHF 0.713 0.925 -0.911 -0.708 0.875 -0.869 -0.830 0.659 -0.84 8 -0.900 Lights 77 424 0 501 -17 52 0 69 -380 25 0 4 05 -975 % Lights 100% 97.9% 0%98.2%-100% 92.9% 0%94 .5%-98.7% 86.2% 0%97.8%-97.8% Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 1 -0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 2 -3 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.2% 0%0.2%-0% 0% 0%0%-0.5% 0% 0%0.5%-0.3% Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 0 8 0 8 -0 4 0 4 -3 4 0 7 -19 % Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 0% 1.8% 0%1.6%-0% 7.1% 0%5.5%-0.8% 13.8% 0%1.7%-1.9% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 6 Holleman Dr at General Pkwy - TMC Tue Mar 6, 2018 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 500335, Location: 30.581067, -96.330254 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US [N] Holleman Dr [E] General Pkwy[S] Holleman Dr Total: 951 Total: 864 Total: 179Out: 441 Out: 450 Out: 106In: 510 In: 414 In: 73 433 385 77 56 17 296 of 6 Cain Rd & Holleman Dr - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 AM Peak (7AM - 8AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499659, Location: 30.572342, -96.32662 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Leg Holleman Dr Cain Rd Holleman Dr Cain Rd Direction Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Time L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*Int 2018-03-01 7:00AM 8 37 0 0 4 5 0 1 0 9 0 10 0 0 94 0 0 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 9 7:15AM 5 32 0 0 37 0 1 0 16 0 17 0 0 170 1 0 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 7:30AM 8 36 0 0 4 4 0 1 0 13 0 14 0 0 154 3 0 157 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 215 7:45AM 6 57 0 0 63 0 2 0 9 0 11 0 0 95 3 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 172 Total 27 162 0 0 189 0 5 0 47 0 52 0 0 513 7 0 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 761 % Approach 14.3% 85.7% 0% 0%--9.6% 0% 90.4% 0%--0% 98.7% 1.3% 0%--0% 0% 0% 0%--- % Total 3.5% 21.3% 0% 0%24 .8%-0.7% 0% 6.2% 0%6.8%-0% 67.4% 0.9% 0%68.3%-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-- PHF 0.844 0.711 - -0.750 -0.625 - 0.734 -0.765 -- 0.754 0.583 -0.760 -- - - ---0.846 Lights 26 144 0 0 170 -4 0 46 0 50 -0 502 6 0 508 -0 0 0 0 0 -728 % Lights 96.3% 88.9% 0% 0%89.9%-80.0% 0% 97.9% 0%96.2%-0% 97.9% 85.7% 0%97.7%-0% 0% 0% 0%--95.7% Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 1 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 1 0 0 1 -0 0 0 0 0 -2 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.6% 0% 0%0.5%-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-0% 0.2% 0% 0%0.2%-0% 0% 0% 0%--0.3% Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 1 17 0 0 18 -1 0 1 0 2 -0 10 1 0 11 -0 0 0 0 0 -31 % Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 3.7% 10.5% 0% 0%9.5%-20.0% 0% 2.1% 0%3.8%-0% 1.9% 14.3%0%2.1%-0% 0 %0% 0%--4.1% Pedestrians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 6 Cain Rd & Holleman Dr - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 AM Peak (7AM - 8AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499659, Location: 30.572342, -96.32662 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US [N] Holleman Dr [E] Cain Rd[S] Holleman Dr Total: 749 Total: 687 Total: 86Out: 560 Out: 167 Out: 34In: 189 In: 520 In: 52 162 513 27 47 5 74 of 6 Cain Rd & Holleman Dr - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499659, Location: 30.572342, -96.32662 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Leg Holleman Dr Cain Rd Holleman Dr Cain Rd Direction Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Time L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*L T R U App Ped*Int 2018-03-01 5:00PM 10 101 0 0 111 0 3 0 27 0 30 0 0 68 1 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 5:15PM 12 107 0 0 119 0 2 0 36 0 38 0 0 49 4 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 5:30PM 12 97 0 0 109 0 2 0 30 0 32 0 0 59 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 5:45PM 9 102 0 0 111 0 3 0 34 0 37 0 0 67 1 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 Total 43 407 0 0 4 50 0 10 0 127 0 137 0 0 243 6 0 24 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 836 % Approach 9.6% 90.4% 0% 0%--7.3% 0% 92.7% 0%--0% 97.6% 2.4% 0%--0% 0% 0% 0%--- % Total 5.1% 48.7% 0% 0%53.8%-1.2% 0% 15.2% 0%16.4 %-0% 29.1% 0.7% 0%29.8%-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-- PHF 0.896 0.951 - -0.94 5 -0.833 - 0.882 -0.901 -- 0.893 0.375 -0.902 -- - - ---0.968 Lights 40 403 0 0 4 4 3 -10 0 127 0 137 -0 239 6 0 24 5 -0 0 0 0 0 -825 % Lights 93.0% 99.0% 0% 0%98.4 %-100% 0% 100% 0%100%-0% 98.4% 100% 0%98.4 %-0% 0% 0% 0%--98.7% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0%0%-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-0% 0% 0% 0%--0% Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 3 4 0 0 7 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 4 0 0 4 -0 0 0 0 0 -11 % Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 7.0% 1.0% 0% 0%1.6%-0% 0% 0% 0%0%-0% 1.6% 0%0%1.6%-0% 0 %0% 0%--1.3% Pedestrians - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 6 Cain Rd & Holleman Dr - TMC Thu Mar 1, 2018 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499659, Location: 30.572342, -96.32662 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US [N] Holleman Dr [E] Cain Rd[S] Holleman Dr Total: 820 Total: 666 Total: 186Out: 370 Out: 417 Out: 49In: 450 In: 249 In: 137 407 243 43 127 10 66 of 6 Deacon W Dr & Holleman Dr - TMC Tue Mar 6, 2018 AM Peak (7AM - 8AM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499658, Location: 30.56875, -96.325107 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Leg Holleman Dr S Deacon W Dr Holleman Dr S Direction Southbound Westbound Northbound Time L T U App Ped*L R U App Ped*T R U App Ped*Int 2018-03-06 7:00AM 1 30 0 31 0 1 25 0 26 0 65 1 0 66 0 123 7:15AM 8 23 1 32 0 1 66 0 67 0 117 2 0 119 0 218 7:30AM 10 25 0 35 0 3 68 0 71 0 103 2 0 105 0 211 7:45AM 11 35 0 4 6 0 1 36 0 37 0 77 6 0 83 0 166 Total 30 113 1 14 4 0 6 195 0 201 0 362 11 0 373 0 718 % Approach 20.8% 78.5% 0.7%--3.0% 97.0% 0%--97.1% 2.9% 0%--- % Total 4.2% 15.7% 0.1%20.1%-0.8% 27.2% 0%28.0%-50.4% 1.5% 0%51.9%-- PHF 0.682 0.807 0.250 0.783 -0.500 0.717 -0.708 -0.774 0.458 -0.784 -0.823 Lights 23 108 1 132 -4 189 0 193 -358 11 0 369 -694 % Lights 76.7% 95.6% 100%91.7%-66.7% 96.9% 0%96.0%-98.9% 100% 0%98.9%-96.7% Articulated Trucks 1 1 0 2 -0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 -2 % Articulated Trucks 3.3% 0.9% 0%1.4 %-0% 0% 0%0%-0% 0% 0%0%-0.3% Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 6 4 0 10 -2 6 0 8 -4 0 0 4 -22 % Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 20.0% 3.5% 0%6.9%-33.3% 3.1% 0%4 .0%-1.1% 0% 0%1.1%-3.1% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 6 Deacon W Dr & Holleman Dr - TMC Tue Mar 6, 2018 AM Peak (7AM - 8AM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499658, Location: 30.56875, -96.325107 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US [N] Holleman Dr S [E] Deacon W Dr[S] Holleman Dr S Total: 702 Total: 492 Total: 242Out: 558 Out: 119 Out: 41In: 144 In: 373 In: 201 113 362 1 30 195 6 114 of 6 Deacon W Dr & Holleman Dr - TMC Tue Mar 6, 2018 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499658, Location: 30.56875, -96.325107 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Leg Holleman Dr S Deacon W Dr Holleman Dr S Direction Southbound Westbound Northbound Time L T U App Ped*L R U App Ped*T R U App Ped*Int 2018-03-06 5:00PM 28 73 0 101 0 2 30 0 32 0 49 1 0 50 0 183 5:15PM 18 73 0 91 0 4 22 0 26 0 39 1 0 4 0 0 157 5:30PM 36 73 0 109 0 4 26 0 30 0 46 2 0 4 8 0 187 5:45PM 30 71 0 101 0 3 19 0 22 0 40 2 0 4 2 0 165 Total 112 290 0 4 02 0 13 97 0 110 0 174 6 0 180 0 692 % Approach 27.9% 72.1% 0%--11.8% 88.2% 0%--96.7% 3.3% 0%--- % Total 16.2% 41.9% 0%58.1%-1.9% 14.0% 0%15.9%-25.1% 0.9% 0%26.0%-- PHF 0.778 0.993 -0.922 -0.813 0.808 -0.859 -0.888 0.750 -0.900 -0.925 Lights 107 284 0 391 -13 92 0 105 -170 6 0 176 -672 % Lights 95.5% 97.9% 0%97.3%-100% 94.8% 0%95.5%-97.7% 100% 0%97.8%-97.1% Articulated Trucks 1 0 0 1 -0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 1 -2 % Articulated Trucks 0.9% 0% 0%0.2%-0% 0% 0%0%-0.6% 0% 0%0.6%-0.3% Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 4 6 0 10 -0 5 0 5 -3 0 0 3 -18 % Buses and Single-Unit Trucks 3.6% 2.1% 0%2.5%-0% 5.2% 0%4 .5%-1.7% 0% 0%1.7%-2.6% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 6 Deacon W Dr & Holleman Dr - TMC Tue Mar 6, 2018 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: 499658, Location: 30.56875, -96.325107 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc. 5215 Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US [N] Holleman Dr S [E] Deacon W Dr[S] Holleman Dr S Total: 673 Total: 483 Total: 228Out: 271 Out: 303 Out: 118In: 402 In: 180 In: 110 290 174 112 97 13 66 of 6 TRIP DISTRIBUTION - MISSION RANCH BUTLER TRACT Mission Ranch Development TRIP DISTRIBUTION - PERSHING POINTE BUTLER TRACT Pershing Pointe Development TRIP DISTRIBUTION - AGGIELAND XPRESS BUTLER TRACT Aggieland Xpress TRIP DISTRIBUTION - UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS BUTLER TRACT University Heights SITE GENERATED TRIPS - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BUTLER TRACT Land Use: 820 Shopping Center Description A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit. A shopping center’s composition is related to its market area in terms of size, location, and type of store. A shopping center also provides on-site parking facilities sufficient to serve its own parking demands. Factory outlet center (Land Use 823) is a related use. Additional Data Shopping centers, including neighborhood centers, community centers, regional centers, and super regional centers, were surveyed for this land use. Some of these centers contained non-merchandising facilities, such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post offices, banks, health clubs, and recreational facilities (for example, ice skating rinks or indoor miniature golf courses). Many shopping centers, in addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building or enclosed around a mall, include outparcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on the perimeter of the center adjacent to the streets and major access points). These buildings are typically drive-in banks, retail stores, restaurants, or small offices. Although the data herein do not indicate which of the centers studied included peripheral buildings, it can be assumed that some of the data show their effect. The vehicle trips generated at a shopping center are based upon the total GLA of the center. In cases of smaller centers without an enclosed mall or peripheral buildings, the GLA could be the same as the gross floor area of the building. Time-of-day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the 10 general urban/ suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 11:45 a.m. and 12:45 p.m. and 12:15 and 1:15 p.m., respectively. The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 27 general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.31 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.43 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 1.46 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), British Columbia (CAN), California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 105, 110, 154, 156, 159, 186, 190, 198, 199, 202, 204, 211, 213, 239, 251, 259, 260, 269, 294, 295, 299, 300, 301, 304, 305, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 314, 315, 316, 317, 319, 358, 365, 376, 385, 390, 400, 404, 414, 420, 423, 428, 437, 440, 442, 444, 446, 507, 562, 580, 598, 629, 658, 702, 715, 728, 868, 870, 871, 880, 899, 908, 912, 915, 926, 936, 944, 946, 960, 961, 962, 973, 974, 978 137Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Retail (Land Uses 800–899) Shopping Center(820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street T raffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 84 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 351 Directional Distribution: 62% entering, 38% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.94 0.18 - 23.74 0.87 Data Plot and Equation T = Trip EndsX = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.50(X) + 151.78 R²= 0.50 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,5000 500 1,000 1,500 Shopping Center(820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street T raffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 261 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 327 Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.81 0.74 - 18.69 2.04 Data Plot and Equation T = Trip EndsX = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Study Site Average RateFitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.74 Ln(X) + 2.89 R²= 0.82 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,0000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Land Use: 435 Multipurpose Recreational Facility Description A multipurpose recreational facility contains two or more of the following land uses combined at one site: miniature golf, batting cages, video arcade, bumper boats, go-carts, and golf driving range. Refreshment areas may also be provided. Golf course (Land Use 430), miniature golf course (Land Use 431), golf driving range (Land Use 432), batting cages (Land Use 433), rock climbing gym (Land Use 434), and trampoline park (Land Use 436) are related uses. Additional Data The sites were surveyed in the 1990s and the 2000s in Oregon. Specialized Land Use Data A survey conducted in Pennsylvania in 1998 was submitted for an indoor race track facility containing a go-cart racing track, arcade, laser tag, restaurant, and party function rooms. The trip generation rates for this facility differ considerably from those contained in this land use. The site gross floor area was 118,000 square feet. The counted vehicle trips were as follows: • 235 on a weekday • 28 during the weekday, AM peak hour of the generator • 29 during the weekday, PM peak hour of the generator • 20 during the weekday, PM peak hour of adjacent street traffic • 277 on a Saturday • 34 during the Saturday peak hour of the generator Source Numbers 583, 611, 618 89Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Recreational (Land Uses 400–499) Multipurpose Recreational Facility(435) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street T raffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 3 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 21 Directional Distribution: 55% entering, 45% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GF A Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.58 2.95 - 4.06 0.55 Data Plot and Equation Caution – Small Sample Size T = Trip EndsX = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= **** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 5 10 15 20 25 300 20 40 60 80 Butler Tract TIA1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetExisting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utler Tract TIA2: Holleman Drive & Dowling RoadExisting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utler Tract TIA1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetBackground (2021)$03HDN+RXU%%,6\QFKUR5HSRUW/DQH*URXS (%/ (%5 1%/ 1%7 6%7 6%5/DQH&RQILJXUDWLRQV7UDIILF9ROXPH YSK      )XWXUH9ROXPH YSK      6DWG)ORZ SURW      )OW3HUPLWWHG 6DWG)ORZ SHUP      6DWG)ORZ 5725 /DQH*URXS)ORZ YSK      7XUQ7\SH 3URW 3HUP SPSW 1$ 1$3URWHFWHG3KDVHV  3HUPLWWHG3KDVHV 7RWDO6SOLW V     7RWDO/RVW7LPH V     $FW(IIFW*UHHQ V     $FWXDWHGJ&5DWLR    YF5DWLR    &RQWURO'HOD\    4XHXH'HOD\    7RWDO'HOD\    /26(%$$%$SSURDFK'HOD\ $SSURDFK/26($ %4XHXH/HQJWKWK IW     4XHXH/HQJWKWK IW     ,QWHUQDO/LQN'LVW IW   7XUQ%D\/HQJWK IW %DVH&DSDFLW\ YSK     6WDUYDWLRQ&DS5HGXFWQ6SLOOEDFN&DS5HGXFWQ6WRUDJH&DS5HGXFWQ5HGXFHGYF5DWLR     ,QWHUVHFWLRQ6XPPDU\&\FOH/HQJWK$FWXDWHG&\FOH/HQJWK2IIVHW  5HIHUHQFHGWRSKDVH6%7DQG1%7/6WDUWRI*UHHQ&RQWURO7\SH3UHWLPHG0D[LPXPYF5DWLR,QWHUVHFWLRQ6LJQDO'HOD\,QWHUVHFWLRQ/26&,QWHUVHFWLRQ&DSDFLW\8WLOL]DWLRQ,&8/HYHORI6HUYLFH$$QDO\VLV3HULRG PLQ WKSHUFHQWLOHYROXPHH[FHHGVFDSDFLW\TXHXHPD\EHORQJHU4XHXHVKRZQLVPD[LPXPDIWHUWZRF\FOHV6SOLWVDQG3KDVHV+ROOHPDQ'ULYH 0DUNHW6WUHHWButler Tract TIA2: Holleman Drive & Dowling RoadBackground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utler Tract TIA1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 227 14 7 742 446 23Future Volume (vph) 227 14 7 742 446 23Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 3514 0Flt Permitted0.950 0.345Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 643 3539 3514 0Satd. Flow (RTOR)168Lane Group Flow (vph) 267 16 8 873 552 0Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NAProtected Phases41 6 2Permitted Phases4 6Total Split (s)20.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 40.0Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Act Effct Green (s)13.0 13.0 53.0 53.0 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.66 0.66 0.41v/c Ratio0.93 0.06 0.01 0.37 0.38Control Delay73.9 14.4 4.7 6.6 17.1Queue Delay0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay73.9 14.4 4.7 6.6 17.1LOSEBAABApproach Delay70.56.6 17.1Approach LOSEA BQueue Length 50th (ft) 133 0 1 88 96Queue Length 95th (ft) #250 15 5 110 126Internal Link Dist (ft) 341 373 378Turn Bay Length (ft)50Base Capacity (vph) 287 270 609 2344 1454Starvation Cap Reductn00000Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.93 0.06 0.01 0.37 0.38Intersection SummaryCycle Length: 80Actuated Cycle Length: 80Offset: 20 (25%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT and 6:NBTL, Start of GreenControl Type: PretimedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.93Intersection Signal Delay: 20.5Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 44.8%ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.Splits and Phases: 1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetButler Tract TIA2: Holleman Drive & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionIntersection Delay, s/veh 24.8Intersection LOSCMovementEBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h143 99 34 23 1 1 38 578 0 17 365 81Future Vol, veh/h143 99 34 23 1 1 38 578 0 17 365 81Peak Hour Factor0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222Mvmt Flow170 118 40 27 1 1 45 688 0 20 435 96Number of Lanes010010020020ApproachEBWBNBSBOpposing Approach WBEBSBNBOpposing Lanes1122Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WBConflicting Lanes Left2211Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EBConflicting Lanes Right2211HCM Control Delay 21.4 12.1 31.8 18.1HCM LOSCBDCLaneNBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2Vol Left, %16% 0% 52% 92% 9% 0%Vol Thru, %84% 100% 36% 4% 91% 69%Vol Right, %0% 0% 12% 4% 0% 31%Sign ControlStop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopTraffic Vol by Lane 231 385 276 25 200 264LT Vol38 0 143 23 17 0Through Vol193 385 99 1 183 183RT Vol0 0 34 1 0 81Lane Flow Rate275 459 329 30 238 314Geometry Grp772277Degree of Util (X) 0.53 0.874 0.637 0.069 0.472 0.601Departure Headway (Hd)6.943 6.859 6.98 8.383 7.158 6.893Convergence, Y/NYes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesCap519 528 519 427 504 524Service Time4.682 4.597 4.98 6.44 4.897 4.633HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.53 0.869 0.634 0.07 0.472 0.599HCM Control Delay17.3 40.5 21.4 12.1 16.2 19.5HCM Lane LOSC E C B C CHCM 95th-tile Q3.1 9.6 4.4 0.2 2.5 3.9 Butler Tract TIA3: Holleman Drive & General ParkwayFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 3.3Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 36 139 1007 54 102 326Future Vol, veh/h 36 139 1007 54 102 326Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 0 - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow43 167 1213 65 123 393Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1689 639 0 0 1278 0 Stage 1 1246 - - - - - Stage 2 443 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 84 419 - - 539 - Stage 1 234 - - - - - Stage 2 614 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 65 419 - - 539 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 143 - - - - - Stage 1 181 - - - - - Stage 2 614 - - - - -ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 23.6 0 3.3HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - 143 419 539 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - 0.303 0.4 0.228 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 40.8 19.2 13.6 -HCM Lane LOS - - E C B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.2 1.9 0.9 -Butler Tract TIA4: Holleman Drive & Cain RoadFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.8Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 5 50 898 7 29 348Future Vol, veh/h 5 50 898 7 29 348Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow6 59 1056 8 34 409Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1333 532 0 0 1064 0 Stage 1 1060----- Stage 2 273-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 145 492 - - 651 - Stage 1 294----- Stage 2 748-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 137 492 - - 651 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 229----- Stage 1 279----- Stage 2 748-----ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 14.5 0 0.8HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - 445 651 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - 0.145 0.052 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 14.5 10.8 -HCM Lane LOS - - B B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.5 0.2 - Butler Tract TIA5: Holleman Drive & Deacon DriveFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 9.4MovementEBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 45 19 11 6 35 12 274 4 621 26 6 62 251 9Future Vol, veh/h 45 19 11 6 35 12 274 4 621 26 6 62 251 9Conflicting Peds, #/hr 00000000000000Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - - None - - - None - - None - - - NoneStorage Length 50 - - - 50 - - 250 - - - 50 - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 82 92 82 92 82 82 92 82 82 92Heavy Vehicles, % 22222222222222Mvmt Flow49 21 12 7 43 13 334 4 757 32 7 76 306 10Major/Minor Minor2Minor1Major1Major2Conflicting Flow All 870 1274 158 0 1111 1263 395 316 0 0 789 789 0 0 Stage 1 477 477 - 0 781 781 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 393 797 - 0 330 482 - - - - - - - -Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 - 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 6.44 4.14 - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 - 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.52 2.22 - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 246 166 859 0 164 168 604 1241 - - 453 827 - - Stage 1 538 554 - 0 354 403 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 603 397 - 0 657 552 - - - - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 93 146 859 0 131 148 604 1241 - - 698 698 - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 93 146 - 0 131 148 - - - - - - - - Stage 1 536 489 - 0 353 402 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 260 396 - 0 548 487 - - - - - - - -ApproachEBWBNBSBHCM Control Delay, s 58.425.302.2HCM LOSFDMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h)1241 - - 93 210 131 541 698 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.526 0.155 0.326 0.642 0.118 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - 80.4 25.3 45.2 22.8 10.8 - -HCM Lane LOS A - - F D E C B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 2.3 0.5 1.3 4.5 0.4 - -Butler Tract TIA6: Holleman NB Channelized Right & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 11.7MovementEBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 116 0 0 0 0 504Future Vol, veh/h 116 0 0 0 0 504Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - YieldStorage Length -----0Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow126 0 0 0 0 548Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0----126 Stage 1------ Stage 2------Critical Hdwy -----6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------Follow-up Hdwy -----3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 0 924 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - Stage 2- 0 0 - 0 -Platoon blocked, % --Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -----924Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ Stage 1------ Stage 2------ApproachEB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0 14.4HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBTCapacity (veh/h)924 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.593 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 - -HCM Lane LOS B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4 - - Butler Tract TIA1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/25/2018Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 231 22 23 537 1022 134Future Volume (vph) 231 22 23 537 1022 134Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 3479 0Flt Permitted0.950 0.100Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 186 3539 3479 0Satd. Flow (RTOR)2422Lane Group Flow (vph) 251 24 25 584 1257 0Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NAProtected Phases41 6 2Permitted Phases4 6Total Split (s)20.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 40.0Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Act Effct Green (s)13.0 13.0 53.0 53.0 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.66 0.66 0.41v/c Ratio0.87 0.09 0.07 0.25 0.87Control Delay64.1 12.9 5.0 5.8 29.2Queue Delay0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay64.1 12.9 5.0 5.8 29.2LOSEBAACApproach Delay59.75.7 29.2Approach LOSEA CQueue Length 50th (ft) 124 0 4 53 289Queue Length 95th (ft) #253 20 11 75 #398Internal Link Dist (ft) 341 373 378Turn Bay Length (ft)50Base Capacity (vph) 287 277 380 2344 1448Starvation Cap Reductn00000Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.87 0.09 0.07 0.25 0.87Intersection SummaryCycle Length: 80Actuated Cycle Length: 80Offset: 20 (25%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT and 6:NBTL, Start of GreenControl Type: PretimedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.87Intersection Signal Delay: 26.5Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 57.0%ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.Splits and Phases: 1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetButler Tract TIA2: Holleman Drive & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/25/2018IntersectionIntersection Delay, s/veh 82.7Intersection LOSFMovementEBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h136 29 56 86 3 12 41 678 0 5 942 102Future Vol, veh/h136 29 56 86 3 12 41 678 0 5 942 102Peak Hour Factor0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222Mvmt Flow148 32 61 93 3 13 45 737 0 5 1024 111Number of Lanes010010020020ApproachEBWBNBSBOpposing Approach WBEBSBNBOpposing Lanes1122Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WBConflicting Lanes Left2211Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EBConflicting Lanes Right2211HCM Control Delay 18.6 14.6 55.5 121.5HCM LOSCBFFLaneNBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2Vol Left, %15% 0% 62% 85% 1% 0%Vol Thru, %85% 100% 13% 3% 99% 82%Vol Right, %0% 0% 25% 12% 0% 18%Sign ControlStop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopTraffic Vol by Lane 267 452 221 101 476 573LT Vol41 0 136 86 5 0Through Vol226 452 29 3 471 471RT Vol0 0 56 12 0 102Lane Flow Rate290 491 240 110 517 623Geometry Grp772277Degree of Util (X) 0.609 1.021 0.51 0.257 1.059 1.252Departure Headway (Hd)7.866 7.788 7.799 8.612 7.37 7.237Convergence, Y/NYes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesCap461 472 466 419 492 504Service Time5.566 5.488 5.799 6.612 5.14 5.007HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.629 1.04 0.515 0.263 1.051 1.236HCM Control Delay22.1 75.2 18.6 14.6 84.4 152.3HCM Lane LOSC F C B F FHCM 95th-tile Q4 13.9 2.8 1 15.8 24.8 Butler Tract TIA3: Holleman Drive & General ParkwayFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/25/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 6.2Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 176 353 627 177 353 695Future Vol, veh/h 176 353 627 177 353 695Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 0 - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow196 392 697 197 392 772Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1966 447 0 0 894 0 Stage 1 796 - - - - - Stage 2 1170 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 55 559 - - 755 - Stage 1 405 - - - - - Stage 2 257 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 26 559 - - 755 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver~ -3063 - - - - - Stage 1 ~ 195 - - - - - Stage 2 257 - - - - -ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 18.1 0 5HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - + 559 755 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - - 0.702 0.519 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 3.9 25.2 14.8 -HCM Lane LOS - - A D B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 5.6 3 -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoonButler Tract TIA4: Holleman Drive & Cain RoadFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/25/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.4Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 11 135 669 6 46 884Future Vol, veh/h 11 135 669 6 46 884Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow12 147 727 7 50 961Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1312 367 0 0 734 0 Stage 1 731----- Stage 2 581-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 150 630 - - 867 - Stage 1 437----- Stage 2 522-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 141 630 - - 867 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 265----- Stage 1 412----- Stage 2 522-----ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 13.7 0 0.5HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - 571 867 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - 0.278 0.058 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 13.7 9.4 -HCM Lane LOS - - B A -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.1 0.2 - Butler Tract TIA5: Holleman Drive & Deacon DriveFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/25/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 36.1MovementEBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 44 12 7 9 34 30 237 13 408 20 9 278 562 30Future Vol, veh/h 44 12 7 9 34 30 237 13 408 20 9 278 562 30Conflicting Peds, #/hr 00000000000000Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - - None - - - None - - None - - - NoneStorage Length 50 - - - 50 - - 250 - - - 50 - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 22222222222222Mvmt Flow48 13 8 10 37 33 258 14 443 22 10 302 611 33Major/Minor Minor2Minor1Major1Major2Conflicting Flow All 1518 1745 322 0 1418 1750 233 644 0 0 465 465 0 0 Stage 1 1252 1252 - 0 482 482 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 266 493 - 0 936 1268 - - - - - - - -Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 - 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 6.44 4.14 - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 - 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.52 2.22 - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 82 85 674 0 97 85 769 937 - - 728 1093 - - Stage 1 182 242 - 0 534 552 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 716 545 - 0 285 238 - - - - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 24 59 674 0 61 59 769 937 - - 1054 1054 - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 24 59 - 0 61 59 - - - - - - - - Stage 1 179 170 - 0 526 544 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 441 537 - 0 183 168 - - - - - - - -ApproachEBWBNBSBHCM Control Delay, s$ 581.569.40.33.2HCM LOSFFMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h)937 - - 24 89 61 327 1054 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 - - 1.993 0.232 0.606 0.888 0.296 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 8.9 - -$ 807.8 57.3 130.1 61.7 9.8 - -HCM Lane LOS A - -FFFFA - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 6 0.8 2.5 8.4 1.2 - -Notes~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoonButler Tract TIA6: Holleman NB Channelized Right & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 1 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/25/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 8.3MovementEBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 34 0 0 0 0 227Future Vol, veh/h 34 0 0 0 0 227Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - YieldStorage Length -----0Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow37 0 0 0 0 247Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0----37 Stage 1------ Stage 2------Critical Hdwy -----6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------Follow-up Hdwy -----3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 0 1035 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - Stage 2- 0 0 - 0 -Platoon blocked, % --Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -----1035Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1------ Stage 2------ApproachEB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.6HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBTCapacity (veh/h)1035 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.238 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 9.6 - -HCM Lane LOS A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 - - Butler Tract TIA1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 227 14 7 709 394 23Future Volume (vph) 227 14 7 709 394 23Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 3511 0Flt Permitted0.950 0.380Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 708 3539 3511 0Satd. Flow (RTOR)169Lane Group Flow (vph) 267 16 8 834 491 0Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NAProtected Phases41 6 2Permitted Phases4 6Total Split (s)20.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 40.0Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Act Effct Green (s)13.0 13.0 53.0 53.0 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.66 0.66 0.41v/c Ratio0.93 0.06 0.01 0.36 0.34Control Delay73.9 14.4 4.7 6.5 16.5Queue Delay0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay73.9 14.4 4.7 6.5 16.5LOSEBAABApproach Delay70.56.5 16.5Approach LOSEA BQueue Length 50th (ft) 133 0 1 84 83Queue Length 95th (ft) #250 15 5 104 112Internal Link Dist (ft) 341 373 378Turn Bay Length (ft)50Base Capacity (vph) 287 270 641 2344 1453Starvation Cap Reductn00000Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.93 0.06 0.01 0.36 0.34Intersection SummaryCycle Length: 80Actuated Cycle Length: 80Offset: 20 (25%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT and 6:NBTL, Start of GreenControl Type: PretimedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.93Intersection Signal Delay: 20.7Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 43.8%ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.Splits and Phases: 1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetButler Tract TIA2: Holleman Drive & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionIntersection Delay, s/veh 20.3Intersection LOSCMovementEBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h143 99 34 13 1 1 38 545 0 17 313 81Future Vol, veh/h143 99 34 13 1 1 38 545 0 17 313 81Peak Hour Factor0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222Mvmt Flow170 118 40 15 1 1 45 649 0 20 373 96Number of Lanes010010020020ApproachEBWBNBSBOpposing Approach WBEBSBNBOpposing Lanes1122Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WBConflicting Lanes Left2211Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EBConflicting Lanes Right2211HCM Control Delay 19.5 11.4 24.3 15.4HCM LOSCBCCLaneNBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2Vol Left, %17% 0% 52% 87% 10% 0%Vol Thru, %83% 100% 36% 7% 90% 66%Vol Right, %0% 0% 12% 7% 0% 34%Sign ControlStop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopTraffic Vol by Lane 220 363 276 15 174 238LT Vol38 0 143 13 17 0Through Vol182 363 99 1 157 157RT Vol0 0 34 1 0 81Lane Flow Rate262 433 329 18 207 283Geometry Grp772277Degree of Util (X) 0.482 0.787 0.606 0.04 0.395 0.517Departure Headway (Hd)6.637 6.548 6.645 8.053 6.877 6.583Convergence, Y/NYes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesCap539 549 542 447 518 543Service Time4.426 4.337 4.72 6.053 4.673 4.378HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.486 0.789 0.607 0.04 0.4 0.521HCM Control Delay15.5 29.6 19.5 11.4 14.2 16.3HCM Lane LOSC D C B B CHCM 95th-tile Q2.6 7.3 4 0.1 1.9 2.9 Butler Tract TIA3: Holleman Drive & General ParkwayFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.7Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 15 100 1007 21 41 326Future Vol, veh/h 15 100 1007 21 41 326Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 0 - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow18 120 1213 25 49 393Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1521 619 0 0 1238 0 Stage 1 1226 - - - - - Stage 2 295 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 109 432 - - 558 - Stage 1 240 - - - - - Stage 2 730 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 99 432 - - 558 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 181 - - - - - Stage 1 219 - - - - - Stage 2 730 - - - - -ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 17.9 0 1.3HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - 181 432 558 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - 0.1 0.279 0.089 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 27.1 16.5 12.1 -HCM Lane LOS - - D C B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 1.1 0.3 -Butler Tract TIA4: Holleman Drive & Cain RoadFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.9Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 5 50 865 7 29 327Future Vol, veh/h 5 50 865 7 29 327Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow6 59 1018 8 34 385Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1283 513 0 0 1026 0 Stage 1 1022----- Stage 2 261-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 157 506 - - 673 - Stage 1 308----- Stage 2 759-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 149 506 - - 673 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 241----- Stage 1 292----- Stage 2 759-----ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 14.1 0 0.9HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - 460 673 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - 0.141 0.051 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 14.1 10.6 -HCM Lane LOS - - B B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.5 0.2 - Butler Tract TIA5: Holleman Drive & Deacon DriveFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 8.6MovementEBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 45 19 11 6 41 12 260 4 603 26 6 59 239 9Future Vol, veh/h 45 19 11 6 41 12 260 4 603 26 6 59 239 9Conflicting Peds, #/hr 00000000000000Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - - None - - - None - - None - - - NoneStorage Length 50 - - - 50 - - 250 - - - 50 - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 82 92 82 92 82 82 92 82 82 92Heavy Vehicles, % 22222222222222Mvmt Flow49 21 12 7 50 13 317 4 735 32 7 72 291 10Major/Minor Minor2Minor1Major1Major2Conflicting Flow All 836 1229 151 0 1073 1218 384 301 0 0 767 767 0 0 Stage 1 454 454 - 0 759 759 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 382 775 - 0 314 459 - - - - - - - -Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 - 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 6.44 4.14 - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 - 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.52 2.22 - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 260 177 868 0 175 179 614 1257 - - 468 842 - - Stage 1 555 568 - 0 365 413 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 612 406 - 0 671 565 - - - - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 108 157 868 0 142 159 614 1257 - - 716 716 - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 108 157 - 0 142 159 - - - - - - - - Stage 1 553 506 - 0 364 412 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 286 405 - 0 566 503 - - - - - - - -ApproachEBWBNBSBHCM Control Delay, s 47.623.802.2HCM LOSECMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h)1257 - - 108 224 142 552 716 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.453 0.146 0.352 0.598 0.11 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - 63.4 23.8 43.5 20.8 10.6 - -HCM Lane LOS A - - F C E C B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 2 0.5 1.4 3.9 0.4 - -Butler Tract TIA6: Holleman NB Channelized Right & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 11.6MovementEBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 116 0 0 0 0 498Future Vol, veh/h 116 0 0 0 0 498Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - YieldStorage Length -----0Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow126 0 0 0 0 541Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0----126 Stage 1------ Stage 2------Critical Hdwy -----6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------Follow-up Hdwy -----3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 0 924 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - Stage 2- 0 0 - 0 -Platoon blocked, % --Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -----924Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ Stage 1------ Stage 2------ApproachEB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0 14.3HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBTCapacity (veh/h)924 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.586 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 14.3 - -HCM Lane LOS B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.9 - - Butler Tract TIA1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 231 22 23 664 871 134Future Volume (vph) 231 22 23 664 871 134Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 3468 0Flt Permitted0.950 0.117Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 218 3539 3468 0Satd. Flow (RTOR)2426Lane Group Flow (vph) 251 24 25 722 1093 0Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NAProtected Phases41 6 2Permitted Phases4 6Total Split (s)20.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 40.0Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Act Effct Green (s)13.0 13.0 53.0 53.0 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.66 0.66 0.41v/c Ratio0.87 0.09 0.06 0.31 0.76Control Delay64.1 12.9 5.0 6.1 23.7Queue Delay0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay64.1 12.9 5.0 6.1 23.7LOSEBAACApproach Delay59.76.1 23.7Approach LOSEA CQueue Length 50th (ft) 124 0 4 70 233Queue Length 95th (ft) #253 20 11 95 309Internal Link Dist (ft) 341 373 378Turn Bay Length (ft)50Base Capacity (vph) 287 277 396 2344 1445Starvation Cap Reductn00000Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.87 0.09 0.06 0.31 0.76Intersection SummaryCycle Length: 80Actuated Cycle Length: 80Offset: 20 (25%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT and 6:NBTL, Start of GreenControl Type: PretimedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.87Intersection Signal Delay: 22.2Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 52.8%ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.Splits and Phases: 1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetButler Tract TIA2: Holleman Drive & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionIntersection Delay, s/veh 37.8Intersection LOSEMovementEBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h136 29 56 58 3 12 41 505 0 5 790 102Future Vol, veh/h136 29 56 58 3 12 41 505 0 5 790 102Peak Hour Factor0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222Mvmt Flow148 32 61 63 3 13 45 549 0 5 859 111Number of Lanes010010020020ApproachEBWBNBSBOpposing Approach WBEBSBNBOpposing Lanes1122Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WBConflicting Lanes Left2211Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EBConflicting Lanes Right2211HCM Control Delay 17.2 13 23.9 53.3HCM LOSCBCFLaneNBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2Vol Left, %20% 0% 62% 79% 1% 0%Vol Thru, %80% 100% 13% 4% 99% 79%Vol Right, %0% 0% 25% 16% 0% 21%Sign ControlStop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopTraffic Vol by Lane 209 337 221 73 400 497LT Vol41 0 136 58 5 0Through Vol168 337 29 3 395 395RT Vol0 0 56 12 0 102Lane Flow Rate228 366 240 79 435 540Geometry Grp772277Degree of Util (X) 0.463 0.745 0.486 0.178 0.833 1.012Departure Headway (Hd)7.445 7.327 7.388 8.253 6.896 6.742Convergence, Y/NYes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesCap487 494 490 437 526 540Service Time5.145 5.045 5.388 6.253 4.605 4.452HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.468 0.741 0.49 0.181 0.827 1HCM Control Delay16.4 28.5 17.2 13 35.3 67.7HCM Lane LOSC D C B E FHCM 95th-tile Q2.4 6.3 2.6 0.6 8.4 14.6 Butler Tract TIA3: Holleman Drive & General ParkwayFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 3.8Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 66 149 627 80 174 695Future Vol, veh/h 66 149 627 80 174 695Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 0 - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow73 166 697 89 193 772Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1514 393 0 0 786 0 Stage 1 742 - - - - - Stage 2 772 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 110 606 - - 829 - Stage 1 432 - - - - - Stage 2 416 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 84 606 - - 829 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 158 - - - - - Stage 1 331 - - - - - Stage 2 416 - - - - -ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 23.3 0 2.1HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - 158 606 829 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - 0.464 0.273 0.233 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 46.1 13.2 10.7 -HCM Lane LOS - - E B B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 2.2 1.1 0.9 -Butler Tract TIA4: Holleman Drive & Cain RoadFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.5Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 11 135 573 6 46 774Future Vol, veh/h 11 135 573 6 46 774Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow12 147 623 7 50 841Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1148 315 0 0 630 0 Stage 1 627----- Stage 2 521-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 192 681 - - 948 - Stage 1 495----- Stage 2 561-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 182 681 - - 948 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 306----- Stage 1 469----- Stage 2 561-----ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 12.7 0 0.5HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - 623 948 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - 0.255 0.053 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 12.7 9 -HCM Lane LOS - - B A -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 0.2 - Butler Tract TIA5: Holleman Drive & Deacon DriveFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 15.6MovementEBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 44 12 7 43 30 196 13 353 20 240 499 30Future Vol, veh/h 44 12 7 43 30 196 13 353 20 240 499 30Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0000000 000Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - - None- - None - - None- - NoneStorage Length 50 - - 50 - - 250 - - 50 - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 - - 0 -- 0 -Grade, %- 0 -- 0 - - 0 -- 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2222222 222Mvmt Flow48 13 8 47 33 213 14 384 22 261 542 33Major/Minor Minor2Minor1Major1Major2Conflicting Flow All 1318 1515 288 1223 1520 203 575 0 0 406 0 0 Stage 1 1081 1081 - 423 423 - - - -- - - Stage 2 237 434 - 800 1097 - - - -- - -Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - -- - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 115 118 709 135 118 804 994 - - 1149 - - Stage 1 232 292 - 579 586 - - - - - - - Stage 2 745 579 - 345 287 - - - -- - -Platoon blocked, %- -- -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 50 90 709 97 90 804 994 - - 1149 - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 50 90 - 97 90 - - - - - - - Stage 1 229 226 - 571 578 - - - -- - - Stage 2 509 571 - 249 222 - - - -- - -ApproachEBWBNBSBHCM Control Delay, s 181.235.50.32.8HCM LOSFEMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h)994 - - 50 133 97 392 1149 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - - 0.957 0.155 0.482 0.627 0.227 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 - - 243.5 37 72.6 28.4 9.1 - -HCM Lane LOS A - - F E F D A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 4.1 0.5 2.1 4.1 0.9 - -Butler Tract TIA15: Holleman NB Channelized Right & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 2 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 8MovementEBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 34 0 0 0 0 196Future Vol, veh/h 34 0 0 0 0 196Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - YieldStorage Length -----0Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow37 0 0 0 0 213Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0----37 Stage 1------ Stage 2------Critical Hdwy -----6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------Follow-up Hdwy -----3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 0 1035 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - Stage 2- 0 0 - 0 -Platoon blocked, % --Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -----1035Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1------ Stage 2------ApproachEB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.4HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBTCapacity (veh/h)1035 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.206 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 - -HCM Lane LOS A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - Butler Tract TIA1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 227 14 7 705 387 23Future Volume (vph) 227 14 7 705 387 23Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 3511 0Flt Permitted0.950 0.385Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 717 3539 3511 0Satd. Flow (RTOR)169Lane Group Flow (vph) 267 16 8 829 482 0Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NAProtected Phases41 6 2Permitted Phases4 6Total Split (s)20.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 40.0Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Act Effct Green (s)13.0 13.0 53.0 53.0 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.66 0.66 0.41v/c Ratio0.93 0.06 0.01 0.35 0.33Control Delay73.9 14.4 4.7 6.5 16.5Queue Delay0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay73.9 14.4 4.7 6.5 16.5LOSEBAABApproach Delay70.56.4 16.5Approach LOSEA BQueue Length 50th (ft) 133 0 1 83 82Queue Length 95th (ft) #250 15 5 103 110Internal Link Dist (ft) 341 373 378Turn Bay Length (ft)50Base Capacity (vph) 287 270 646 2344 1453Starvation Cap Reductn00000Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.93 0.06 0.01 0.35 0.33Intersection SummaryCycle Length: 80Actuated Cycle Length: 80Offset: 20 (25%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT and 6:NBTL, Start of GreenControl Type: PretimedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.93Intersection Signal Delay: 20.8Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 43.7%ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.Splits and Phases: 1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetButler Tract TIA2: Holleman Drive & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionIntersection Delay, s/veh 19.9Intersection LOSCMovementEBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h143 99 34 12 1 1 38 541 0 17 306 81Future Vol, veh/h143 99 34 12 1 1 38 541 0 17 306 81Peak Hour Factor0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84Heavy Vehicles, %222222222222Mvmt Flow170 118 40 14 1 1 45 644 0 20 364 96Number of Lanes010010020020ApproachEBWBNBSBOpposing Approach WBEBSBNBOpposing Lanes1122Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WBConflicting Lanes Left2211Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EBConflicting Lanes Right2211HCM Control Delay 19.4 11.3 23.7 15.2HCM LOSCBCCLaneNBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2Vol Left, %17% 0% 52% 86% 10% 0%Vol Thru, %83% 100% 36% 7% 90% 65%Vol Right, %0% 0% 12% 7% 0% 35%Sign ControlStop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopTraffic Vol by Lane 218 361 276 14 170 234LT Vol38 0 143 12 17 0Through Vol180 361 99 1 153 153RT Vol0 0 34 1 0 81Lane Flow Rate260 429 329 17 202 279Geometry Grp772277Degree of Util (X) 0.477 0.778 0.604 0.037 0.386 0.508Departure Headway (Hd)6.613 6.524 6.618 8.01 6.858 6.559Convergence, Y/NYes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesCap541 550 542 450 520 546Service Time4.401 4.312 4.691 6.01 4.653 4.353HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.481 0.78 0.607 0.038 0.388 0.511HCM Control Delay15.4 28.7 19.4 11.3 14 16HCM Lane LOSC D C B B CHCM 95th-tile Q2.6 7.1 4 0.1 1.8 2.9 Butler Tract TIA3: Holleman Drive & General ParkwayFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.5Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 12 95 1007 16 32 326Future Vol, veh/h 12 95 1007 16 32 326Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 0 - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow14 114 1213 19 39 393Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1498 616 0 0 1232 0 Stage 1 1223 - - - - - Stage 2 275 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 113 433 - - 561 - Stage 1 241 - - - - - Stage 2 747 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 105 433 - - 561 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 186 - - - - - Stage 1 224 - - - - - Stage 2 747 - - - - -ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 17.4 0 1.1HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - 186 433 561 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - 0.078 0.264 0.069 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 26 16.3 11.9 -HCM Lane LOS - - D C B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 1.1 0.2 -Butler Tract TIA4: Holleman Drive & Cain RoadFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.9Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 5 50 860 7 29 324Future Vol, veh/h 5 50 860 7 29 324Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow6 59 1012 8 34 381Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1275 510 0 0 1020 0 Stage 1 1016----- Stage 2 259-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 159 509 - - 676 - Stage 1 310----- Stage 2 761-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 151 509 - - 676 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 243----- Stage 1 295----- Stage 2 761-----ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 14 0 0.9HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - 463 676 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - 0.14 0.05 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 14 10.6 -HCM Lane LOS - - B B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.5 0.2 - Butler Tract TIA5: Holleman Drive & Deacon DriveFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 8.5MovementEBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 45 19 11 6 41 12 258 4 600 26 6 58 237 9Future Vol, veh/h 45 19 11 6 41 12 258 4 600 26 6 58 237 9Conflicting Peds, #/hr 00000000000000Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - - None - - - None - - None - - - NoneStorage Length 50 - - - 50 - - 250 - - - 50 - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 82 92 82 92 82 82 92 82 82 92Heavy Vehicles, % 22222222222222Mvmt Flow49 21 12 7 50 13 315 4 732 32 7 71 289 10Major/Minor Minor2Minor1Major1Major2Conflicting Flow All 831 1222 150 0 1067 1211 382 299 0 0 763 764 0 0 Stage 1 450 450 - 0 756 756 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 381 772 - 0 311 455 - - - - - - - -Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 - 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 6.44 4.14 - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 - 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.52 2.22 - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 262 178 870 0 176 181 616 1259 - - 471 845 - - Stage 1 558 570 - 0 366 414 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 613 407 - 0 674 567 - - - - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 110 158 870 0 143 161 616 1259 - - 719 719 - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 110 158 - 0 143 161 - - - - - - - - Stage 1 556 509 - 0 365 413 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 290 406 - 0 569 506 - - - - - - - -ApproachEBWBNBSBHCM Control Delay, s 46.423.502.2HCM LOSECMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h)1259 - - 110 226 143 554 719 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.445 0.144 0.35 0.591 0.107 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - 61.6 23.6 43.1 20.5 10.6 - -HCM Lane LOS A - - F C E C B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 1.9 0.5 1.4 3.8 0.4 - -Butler Tract TIA6: Holleman NB Channelized Right & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)AM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 11.5MovementEBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 116 0 0 0 0 497Future Vol, veh/h 116 0 0 0 0 497Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - YieldStorage Length -----0Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow126 0 0 0 0 540Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0----126 Stage 1------ Stage 2------Critical Hdwy -----6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------Follow-up Hdwy -----3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 0 924 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - Stage 2- 0 0 - 0 -Platoon blocked, % --Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -----924Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ Stage 1------ Stage 2------ApproachEB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0 14.2HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBTCapacity (veh/h)924 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.585 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 14.2 - -HCM Lane LOS B - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.9 - - Butler Tract TIA1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (vph) 231 22 23 641 849 134Future Volume (vph) 231 22 23 641 849 134Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1583 1770 3539 3468 0Flt Permitted0.950 0.125Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1583 233 3539 3468 0Satd. Flow (RTOR)2427Lane Group Flow (vph) 251 24 25 697 1069 0Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NAProtected Phases41 6 2Permitted Phases4 6Total Split (s)20.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 40.0Total Lost Time (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Act Effct Green (s)13.0 13.0 53.0 53.0 33.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.66 0.66 0.41v/c Ratio0.87 0.09 0.06 0.30 0.74Control Delay64.1 12.9 5.0 6.1 23.1Queue Delay0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay64.1 12.9 5.0 6.1 23.1LOSEBAACApproach Delay59.76.0 23.1Approach LOSEA CQueue Length 50th (ft) 124 0 4 66 224Queue Length 95th (ft) #253 20 11 91 299Internal Link Dist (ft) 341 373 378Turn Bay Length (ft)50Base Capacity (vph) 287 277 404 2344 1446Starvation Cap Reductn00000Spillback Cap Reductn00000Storage Cap Reductn00000Reduced v/c Ratio 0.87 0.09 0.06 0.30 0.74Intersection SummaryCycle Length: 80Actuated Cycle Length: 80Offset: 20 (25%), Referenced to phase 2:SBT and 6:NBTL, Start of GreenControl Type: PretimedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.87Intersection Signal Delay: 22.0Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 52.2%ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.Splits and Phases: 1: Holleman Drive & Market StreetButler Tract TIA2: Holleman Drive & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionIntersection Delay, s/veh 33.2Intersection LOSDMovementEBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h136 29 56 54 3 12 41 481 0 5 769 102Future Vol, veh/h136 29 56 54 3 12 41 481 0 5 769 102Peak Hour Factor0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Heavy Vehicles, %111111111111Mvmt Flow148 32 61 59 3 13 45 523 0 5 836 111Number of Lanes010010020020ApproachEBWBNBSBOpposing Approach WBEBSBNBOpposing Lanes1122Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WBConflicting Lanes Left2211Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EBConflicting Lanes Right2211HCM Control Delay 17 12.8 21.5 45.9HCM LOSCBCELaneNBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2Vol Left, %20% 0% 62% 78% 1% 0%Vol Thru, %80% 100% 13% 4% 99% 79%Vol Right, %0% 0% 25% 17% 0% 21%Sign ControlStop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopTraffic Vol by Lane 201 321 221 69 390 487LT Vol41 0 136 54 5 0Through Vol160 321 29 3 385 385RT Vol0 0 56 12 0 102Lane Flow Rate219 349 240 75 423 529Geometry Grp772277Degree of Util (X) 0.445 0.699 0.486 0.169 0.797 0.973Departure Headway (Hd)7.327 7.222 7.29 8.111 6.78 6.624Convergence, Y/NYes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesCap492 502 497 443 533 550Service Time5.065 4.961 5.29 6.152 4.517 4.36HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.445 0.695 0.483 0.169 0.794 0.962HCM Control Delay15.8 25.1 17 12.8 31.2 57.6HCM Lane LOSC D C B D FHCM 95th-tile Q2.3 5.4 2.6 0.6 7.5 13.2 Butler Tract TIA3: Holleman Drive & General ParkwayFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2.7Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 51 121 627 67 149 695Future Vol, veh/h 51 121 627 67 149 695Conflicting Peds, #/hr 000000Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 0 - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90Heavy Vehicles, % 222222Mvmt Flow57 134 697 74 166 772Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1452 386 0 0 771 0 Stage 1 734 - - - - - Stage 2 718 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 121 612 - - 840 - Stage 1 436 - - - - - Stage 2 444 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 97 612 - - 840 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 185 - - - - - Stage 1 350 - - - - - Stage 2 444 - - - - -ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 18.5 0 1.8HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - 185 612 840 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - 0.306 0.22 0.197 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 32.8 12.5 10.3 -HCM Lane LOS - - D B B -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.2 0.8 0.7 -Butler Tract TIA4: Holleman Drive & Cain RoadFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.5Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 11 135 559 6 46 759Future Vol, veh/h 11 135 559 6 46 759Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - 50 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow12 147 608 7 50 825Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 1125 308 0 0 615 0 Stage 1 612----- Stage 2 513-----Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -Critical Hdwy Stg 15.84-----Critical Hdwy Stg 25.84-----Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 199 688 - - 961 - Stage 1 504----- Stage 2 566-----Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 189 688 - - 961 -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 313----- Stage 1 478----- Stage 2 566-----ApproachWB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 12.6 0 0.5HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBTCapacity (veh/h)- - 631 961 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio- - 0.251 0.052 -HCM Control Delay (s) - - 12.6 9 -HCM Lane LOS - - B A -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 0.2 - Butler Tract TIA5: Holleman Drive & Deacon DriveFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 15.6MovementEBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 44 12 7 9 43 30 190 13 345 20 9 234 490 30Future Vol, veh/h 44 12 7 9 43 30 190 13 345 20 9 234 490 30Conflicting Peds, #/hr 00000000000000Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - - None - - - None - - None - - - NoneStorage Length 50 - - - 50 - - 250 - - - 50 - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - - 0 - - 0 - - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 22222222222222Mvmt Flow48 13 8 10 47 33 207 14 375 22 10 254 533 33Major/Minor Minor2Minor1Major1Major2Conflicting Flow All 1310 1503 283 0 1215 1508 199 566 0 0 397 397 0 0 Stage 1 1078 1078 - 0 414 414 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 232 425 - 0 801 1094 - - - - - - - -Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 - 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 6.44 4.14 - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 - 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.52 2.22 - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 117 120 714 0 137 120 809 1002 - - 804 1158 - - Stage 1 233 293 - 0 586 591 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 750 585 - 0 344 288 - - - - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 51 90 714 0 98 90 809 1002 - - 1121 1121 - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 51 90 - 0 98 90 - - - - - - - - Stage 1 230 224 - 0 578 583 - - - - - - - - Stage 2 520 577 - 0 245 220 - - - - - - - -ApproachEBWBNBSBHCM Control Delay, s 175.135.30.32.9HCM LOSFEMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h)1002 - - 51 133 98 387 1121 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - - 0.938 0.155 0.477 0.618 0.236 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 - - 234.7 37 71.5 28.2 9.2 - -HCM Lane LOS A - - F E F D A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 4 0.5 2.1 4 0.9 - -Butler Tract TIA15: Holleman NB Channelized Right & Dowling RoadFull Build - Option 3 - (2021)PM Peak HourBBISynchro 10 Report06/23/2018IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 8MovementEBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 34 0 0 0 0 192Future Vol, veh/h 34 0 0 0 0 192Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - YieldStorage Length -----0Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow37 0 0 0 0 209Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0----37 Stage 1------ Stage 2------Critical Hdwy -----6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------Follow-up Hdwy -----3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - 0 1035 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - Stage 2- 0 0 - 0 -Platoon blocked, % --Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -----1035Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1------ Stage 2------ApproachEB WB NBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.4HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBTCapacity (veh/h)1035 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.202 - -HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 - -HCM Lane LOS A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - Traffic Analysis – Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service Descriptions Binkley & Barfield HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level-of-Service (LOS) Average Control Delay (seconds per vehicle) Description A ≤ 10.0 Very low vehicle delays, free flow, signal progression extremely favorable, most vehicles arrive during given signal phase. B 10.1 - 20.0 Good signal progression, more vehicles stop and experience higher delays than for LOS A. C 20.1 - 35.0 Stable flow, fair signal progression, significant number of vehicles stop at signals. D 35.1 - 55.0 Congestion noticeable, longer delays and unfavorable signal progression, many vehicles stop at signals. E 55.1 - 80.0 Limit of acceptable delay, unstable flow, poor signal progression, traffic near roadway capacity, frequent cycle failures. F > 80.0 Unacceptable delays, extremely unstable flow and congestion, traffic exceeds roadway capacity, stop-and- go conditions. SOURCE: Highway Capacity Manual, HCM 2010, Transportation Research Board, 2010. Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level-of-Service (LOS) Average Control Delay (seconds per vehicle) Description A ≤ 10.0 No delays at intersections with continuous flow of traffic. Uncongested operations: high frequency of long gaps available for all left and right turning traffic. No observable queues. B 10.1 - 15.0 No delays at intersections with continuous flow of traffic. Uncongested operations: high frequency of long gaps available for all left and right turning traffic. No observable queues. C 15.1 - 25.0 Moderate delays at intersections with satisfactory to good traffic flow. Light congestion; infrequent backups on critical approaches. D 25.1 - 35.0 Increased probability of delays along every approach. Significant congestion on critical approaches, but intersection functional. No standing long lines formed. E 35.1 - 50.0 Heavy traffic flow condition. Heavy delays probable. No available gaps for cross-street traffic or main street turning traffic. Limit of stable flow. F > 50.0 Unstable traffic flow. Heavy congestion. Traffic moves in forced flow condition. Average delays greater than one minute highly probable. Total breakdown. SOURCE: Highway Capacity Manual, HCM 2010, Transportation Research Board, 2010. August 2, 2018 Regular Agenda Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Loveless Tract To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Alaina Helton, AICP, Senior Planner Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use & Character Map from Suburban Commercial to Urban for approximately 11.1 acres located on the west side of Turkey Creek Road, approximately 500-feet south of HSC Parkway. Case #CPA2018-000002 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the August 23rd City Council Meeting- Subject to change.) Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Summary: The applicant is requesting the proposed future land use amendment from Suburban Commercial to Urban. This development is intended to serve the nearby BioCorridor Planned Development District and to provide supplemental uses that add to the efforts made in that area. The subject property and properties to the south are designated as Suburban Commercial. Properties to the north, east and west are designated Business Park on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Changed or changing conditions in the subject area or the City: The City of College Station’s Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2009. In 2010, through the coordination of the Research Valley Partnership, the Research Valley BioCorridor Concept Master Plan was developed, consisting of a conceptual area of approximately 3,500 acres, spanning the jurisdictions of College Station and Bryan and including property owned by the Texas A&M University System. In 2012, approximately 200 acres west of Turkey Creek Road were zoned BioCorridor Planned Development District (PDD) to encourage research and development, manufacturing, and warehousing for biomedical and other emerging technology industries in the area. The area surrounding this PDD is anticipated to serve as a secondary or supplementary region that would provide supportive land uses enhancing the development occurring within the BioCorridor District. The BioCorridor Concept Master Plan envisioned a mix of uses in the subject area; thus prompting the request to amend the Future Land Use map to Urban. Development pressure in this area has increased since the conception of the BioCorridor Master Plan, and the City of College Station has made significant agreements and infrastructure investments in the nearby area (e.g., roadway and electric improvements and changes in sewer certificated areas) to support the success of business development in the region. In addition, three properties in the vicinity of the BioCorridor PDD have had their land use designations changed to Urban in past couple of years to accommodate the development of supporting uses to the BioCorridor and in anticipation of land use demands related to the RELLIS campus in Bryan. 2. Scope of the request: Currently, the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the area west of Turkey Creek Road and north of Raymond Stotzer Parkway to be approximately 37 acres of Suburban Commercial, 11 acres of Urban and 198 acre of Business Park, the majority of which is zoned BioCorridor Planned Development District. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the area to the east of Turkey Creek Road and west of Harvey Mitchell Parkway to be approximately 23 acres of Suburban Commercial (property already zoned for commercial uses along Harvey Mitchell), 17 acres of Urban, 6 acres of General Commercial, 39 acres to be Texas A&M University (property owned by Texas A&M), 29 acres of Public/Institutional (the City’s cemetery), and the largest designation to be 54 acres of Business Park. The proposal is to convert approximately 11 acres from Suburban Commercial to Urban on the west side of Turkey Creek Road, approximately 500-feet south of HSC Parkway. The proposed amendment would allow for a very intense level of residential development activities being townhouse, duplexes, and high-density apartments. 3. Availability of adequate information: The Urban designation allows for future development of high-density residential uses such as townhomes, duplexes and multi-family. Water service is provided to properties in this area by the City of College Station and Wellborn Special Utility District (SUD), but additional infrastructure improvements may be needed with further site development to meet minimum fire flow requirements. Sanitary sewer for the property will be provided by the City of Bryan, and extensions to provide service to the property may be needed with further site development. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was submitted for review as part of the request. 4. Consistency with the goals and strategies set forth in the Plan: The proposal is consistent with the goals and strategies of the Comprehensive Plan. The goal for College Station’s Future Land Use and Character is to create a community with strong, unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a protected and enhanced natural environment. The subject property and surrounding area are identified in the Comprehensive Plan Concept Map as one of the City’s distinct districts—the Presidential Corridor Gateway District—which seeks to attract business (research and development, office, and light industrial) and preserve and build upon the existing assets in the area enhancing this important gateway into the city. The Urban land use encourages growth, by providing workforce housing needed to support commercial uses in the area. 5. Consideration of the Future Land Use & Character and/or Thoroughfare Plans: The existing Future Land Use and Character designation on the property is Suburban Commercial, which is defined as a land use designation “generally for concentrations of commercial activities that cater primarily to nearby residents versus the larger community or region. Generally, these areas tend to be small in size and located adjacent to major roads (arterials and collectors). Design of these structures is compatible in size, roof type and pitch, architecture, and lot coverage with the surrounding single-family residential uses”. While the land use designation is still valid and could support the growth of a research and development and manufacturing district, none of the surrounding properties are zoned or designated for single-family development, except for the adjacent properties that are zoned Rural, which are also designated as Suburban Commercial and Business Park on the Future Land Use and Character Map, and are anticipated to develop as such in the future. The proposed Urban land use also encourages growth, by providing workforce housing needed to support commercial uses in the area. Urban is described as: Generally for areas that should have a very intense level of development activities. These areas will tend to consist of townhomes, duplexes, and high-density apartments. General commercial and office uses, business parks, and vertical mixed-use may also be permitted within growth and redevelopment areas. The Urban land use designation, when not in a Growth Area, is typically characterized by more dense residential developments in the form of duplexes, townhomes or apartments. The subject tract has frontage to Turkey Creek Road which is designated as a future Major Collector on the Thoroughfare Plan. Turkey Creek Road is currently constructed as two-lane rural section roadway. The applicant anticipates driveway access to Atlas Pear Drive which would be extended with development south from HSC Parkway and be designed as Minor Collector. 6. Compatibility with the surrounding area: The adjacent land uses to the east and south are large lot single- family and unimproved rural tracts varying in size from 4 to 7 acres. The property to the north and west is currently undeveloped and is located within the BioCorridor Planned Development District. These existing rural developments are less dense than the Business Park designation prescribes. An Urban development will provide a different character than these existing properties currently provide. Land located north, east and west of the subject property is anticipated for future Business Park, and property to the south, Suburban Commercial land uses. The proposed amendment, while not consistent with the planned future development pattern in the area, is compatible as supporting land uses for the Business Park uses that are anticipated to develop. 7. Impacts on infrastructure including water, wastewater, drainage, and the transportation network: The subject tract is split between the City of College Station CCN and Wellborn SUD CCN for water service. Depending on the future layout and development of the site, if buildings are in the City of College Station CCN, there will be an offsite extension of waterline required to connect to the existing 18-inch water main on the south side of HSC Pkwy. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by City of Bryan. Sanitary sewer lines will be required to be extended to serve this property at the time of site development. Available utilities in the area appear to be adequate to support the proposed use at this time. Drainage is generally to the south within the Whites Creek Drainage Basin. Currently, there is no FEMA regulated flood plain on site, however, detention will be required with site development. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with the site shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject tract has frontage to Turkey Creek Road which is designated as a future Major Collector on the Thoroughfare Plan. Turkey Creek Road is currently constructed as two-lane rural section roadway and is under TxDOT jurisdiction as FM 2513. The applicant also anticipates driveway access to Atlas Pear Drive which would be extended with development south from HSC Parkway and be designed as Minor Collector. 8. Impact on the City’s ability to provide, fund, and maintain services: Sanitary sewer services will be provided by the City of Bryan. The subject property is located within both the City of College Station and Wellborn Special Utility District (SUD) service area, with the front portion of the property fronting Turkey Road served by Wellborn (SUD), and the back portion located within the College Station water service area. There is a 12” water main located at the intersection of Turkey Creek Road and HSC Parkway that would need to be extended to serve the portion of the property served by College Station. 9. Impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas: A small pond is located on the property, but this area is not recognized as environmentally sensitive, nor is there any FEMA regulated floodplain onsite. 10. Contribution to the overall direction and character of the community as captured in the Plan’s vision and goals: The goal for College Station’s Future Land Use and Character is to create a community with strong, unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a protected and enhanced natural environment. The proposed amendment from Suburban Commercial to Urban on just over 11 acres does not limit the general goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment is proposing a density and level of service compatible with the planned growth of the BioCorridor District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map from Suburban Commercial to Urban. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Background Information 1. Vicinity & Aerial Map 2. Application 3. Comprehensive Plan Exhibit 4. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 2, 2018 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: August 23, 2018 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Contacts in support: None Contacts in opposition: None Inquiry contacts: One at the time of staff report. ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Business Park Planned Development District (BioCorridor) Rural South Suburban Commercial Rural Rural East (across Turkey Creek Road) Business Park Rural Single-Family Residential West Business Park Planned Development District (BioCorridor) Rural DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: June 21, 1995 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation A-O Agricultural Open renamed to R Rural in 2013 Final Plat: Property is not platted Site development: Property is generally undeveloped. It is the site of a former horse stable. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY (~__J~j~~CASE NO ________________ DATE SUBMITTED:________________ CITY OF CoLLEGE STATION TIME:___________________ Home ofTexasA&M University~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION (Check all applicable) ~Related to Community Character ~Related to Transportation ~Related to Other MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Fee.(Refer to the Planning and Development Fee Schedule for all applicable fees) ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Fully dimensioned map (scaled to 24”x36”, Landscape Orientation)showing,if applicable: a.Land affected b.Present zoning of property and zoning classification of all abutting property; c.Current Concept Map and Future Land Use and Character Map classifications and proposed classifications; d.Current Concept Map and Future Land Use and Character Map classifications of all abutting property; e.Current and proposed thoroughfare alignments; f.Currently planned utility infrastructure and proposed utility infrastructure; g.General location and address of property;and h.Total acres of property. ~Electronic Submittal: Must be scanned or saved at 300 dpi (dots per inch)resolution when uploaded to TRAKiT. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference __________________________________________________________________ NAME OF PROJECT Loveless Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment ADDRESS 8590 Turkey Creek Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block,Subdivision)A002601,John HJones,Tract 60,11.6Acres GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY,IF NOT PLATTED: Approximately 500’south of the HSC Parkway and Turkey Creek Road Intersection TOTAL ACREAGE 11.14 Acres APPLICANT I PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Traditions Acquisition Partnership, LP E-mail csandlin@atlastx.com Street Address 4250 South Traditions Drive City Biyan State Texas Zip Code 77807 Phone Number 979.704.6395 Fax Number ______________________________ 2/18 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION: Name Loveless Acres LC -William Loveless E-mail bilI©christislifeministries.com Street Address 212 Windsor Drive City Boerne State Texas Zip Code 78006 Phone Number 210.478.0618 Fax Number _____________________ ANSWER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: 1.What specific element of the Comprehensive Plan (for example,Land Use and Character designation,Thoroughfare Plan Context Class,or thoroughfare alignment)and at what specific location (if applicable)is requested to be amended? We are seeking a change in land use from Suburban Commercial to Urban. 2.What is the amendment request? The Comprehensive Plan had the future development for this property to be Suburban Commercial,which is to be amended to Urban.This change will be compatible with the desired land use planned for the adjacent Bio Corridor. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.Changed or changing conditions in the subject area of the City. The development of the adjacent Bio Corridor area has commenced and there will be a demand for urban development to support and compliment the research and manufacturing uses within the Bio Corridor. Also,the RELLIS campus development will increase the demand for residential land uses along the SH 47 and FM 60 Corridors.The success of the Multi-Family development on Atlas Pear Drive,just north of this property is an indicator of the demand for residential use in this area. 2.Compatibility with the existing uses,development patterns,and character of the immediate area concerned,the general area, and the city as a whole. There is a considerable amount of land in the Blo Corridor that will need these supporting uses.Also,the RELLIS Campus development wiil increase the demand for residential land uses along the SH 47 and FM 60 Corridors.There is a significant amount of land available for commercial uses along FM 60,SH 47 and HSC Parkway.Additional residential units are needed to support commercial uses. 3.Impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas The Urban land use will not have an impact on any environmentally sensitive and natural areas,in the same way the existing Suburban Commercial land use would not impact these areas. 4.lmpacts on infrastructure, including water,wastewater, drainage and transportation network Water,wastewater,drainage and transportation infrastructure will be added and approved to support the existing and proposed land uses. 2/18 Page 2 of 3 5.Consistency with the goals and strategies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive plan is for this land to be Suburban Commercial,the change to Urban will allow the addition of land uses which will compliment the Bio Corridor and the RELLIS campus and also conform with the policies,goals and the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf. Signthure and title Date 2/18 I Print Form Page 3 of 3 11.14 AC.TURKEY CREEK ROAD - FM 2513FUTURE LAND USE: SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL 11.14 AC.TURKEY CREEK ROAD - FM 2513PROPOSED LAND USE: URBAN FUTURE LAND USE VICINITY MAP HSC P A R K W A Y NOT TO SCALE TURKEY CREEK ROAD RAY M O N D S T O T Z E R P A R K W A Y COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 11.14 ACRES LOVELESS ACRES L.C. PROPOSED LAND USE TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER:SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 OWNER/DEVELOPER: LOVELESS ACRES L.C. 212 WINDSOR DR. BOERNE, TX 778006 832.221.7493 APPLICANT: TRADITIONS ACQUISITIONS PARTNERSHIP, LP 4250 SOUTH TRADITIONS DR. BRYAN, TX 77807 979.704.6395 SCALE: 1"=100' June 2018 August 2, 2018 Regular Agenda Rezoning – Loveless Tract To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Alaina Helton, AICP, Senior Planner Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix “A”, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from Rural to Multi-Family on approximately 11.1 acres located on the west side of Turkey Creek Road, approximately 500-feet south of HSC Parkway. Case #REZ2018-000009 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the August 23rd City Council Meeting- Subject to change.) Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request with the condition that a turn lane be constructed on the eastbound approach of F&B Road at FM 2818 intersection to help mitigate the traffic added by the development to the intersection’s anticipated failing level of service. Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 11.1 acres from R Rural to MF Multi-Family. This rezoning is in conjunction with a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map by changing the designation of this property from Suburban Commercial to Urban. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: This request is in conjunction with a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map by changing the designation of this property from Suburban Commercial to Urban. The City of College Station’s Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2009. In 2010, through the coordination of the Research Valley Partnership, the Research Valley BioCorridor Concept Master Plan was developed, consisting of a conceptual area of approximately 3,500 acres, spanning the jurisdictions of College Station and Bryan and including property owned by the Texas A&M University System. In 2012, approximately 200 acres west of Turkey Creek Road were zoned BioCorridor Planned Development District (PDD) to encourage research and development, manufacturing, and warehousing for biomedical and other emerging technology industries in the area. The area surrounding this PDD is anticipated to serve as a secondary or supplementary region that would provide supportive land uses enhancing the development occurring within the BioCorridor District. The BioCorridor Concept Master Plan envisioned a mix of uses in the subject area; thus prompting the request to amend the Future Land Use map to Urban and the zoning to Multi-Family. Currently, the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the area west of Turkey Creek Road and north of Raymond Stotzer Parkway to be approximately 37 acres of Suburban Commercial, 11 acres of Urban and 198 acre of Business Park, the majority of which is zoned BioCorridor Planned Development District. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the area to the east of Turkey Creek Road and west of Harvey Mitchell Parkway to be approximately 23 acres of Suburban Commercial (property already zoned for commercial uses along Harvey Mitchell), 17 acres of Urban, 6 acres of General Commercial, 39 acres to be Texas A&M University (property owned by Texas A&M), 29 acres of Public/Institutional (the City’s cemetery), and the largest designation to be 54 acres of Business Park. The proposed zoning complements and is consistent with the allowable land uses for the Presidential Corridor Gateway District and with the surrounding future land use designations. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The existing R Rural zoning allows for large lot residential and/or agricultural uses, which is not compatible or supportive of more intense development that is anticipated for the area. Given the property’s close proximity to the BioCorridor Planned Development District, this area is expected to contain uses that support the investment plan that has been set in this District. An R Rural designation does not support the planned growth. The adjacent land uses to the east and south are large lot single- family and unimproved rural tracts varying in size from four to seven acres. The property to the north and west is currently undeveloped and is located within the BioCorridor Planned Development District. The existing rural developments are less dense than the Multi-Family designation prescribes. A Multi- Family development will provide a different character than these existing properties currently provide. The proposed zoning change, while not compatible with the land uses located immediately to the east and south, is compatible as supporting land uses for the Business Park uses that are anticipated to develop. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed land uses permitted through this request are those allowed in MF Multi-Family. The uses are appropriate as they support the uses planned in the BioCorridor PDD and because of the property’s proximity to HSC Parkway and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. The intent of the area surrounding the BioCorridor District is to help preserve and support the district by providing similar and supplementary uses that focus on research and development, manufacturing, office uses, and other additional uses that would serve those that live and work in the area. The applicant feels the request meets the intentions of the district which is to provide an atmosphere capable of creating the mixed use development desired for the BioCorridor District. Water service is provided to properties in this area by the City of College Station and Wellborn Special Utility District (SUD), but additional infrastructure improvements may be needed with further site development to meet minimum fire flow requirements. Sanitary sewer for the property will be provided by the City of Bryan, and extensions to provide service to the property may be needed with further site development. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was submitted for review as part of the request. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property is currently zoned R Rural. The current zoning district is suitable for the property given the similar zonings and uses of nearby property. However, this is the third rezoning for more intense land uses requested in the area outside of the BioCorridor PDD. While R Rural is suitable with the current land uses, the area is expected to see continued change moving forward. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property can currently be marketed under the existing R Rural zoning district. However, the applicant has stated that the use is not appropriate or feasible for this property knowing the current development happening on nearby property and the anticipated change in the development pattern for the area. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: The subject tract is split between the City of College Station CCN and Wellborn SUD CCN for water service. Depending on the future layout and development of the site, if buildings are in the City of College Station CCN, there will be an offsite extension of waterline required to connect to the existing 18-inch water main on the south side of HSC Pkwy. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by City of Bryan. Sanitary sewer lines will be required to be extended to serve this property at the time of site development. Available utilities in the area appear to be adequate to support the proposed use at this time. Drainage is generally to the south within the Whites Creek Drainage Basin. Currently, there is no FEMA regulated flood plain on site, however, detention will be required with site development. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with the site shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject tract has frontage to Turkey Creek Road which is designated as a future Major Collector on the Thoroughfare Plan. Turkey Creek Road is currently constructed as two-lane rural section roadway and is under TxDOT jurisdiction as FM 2513. The applicant also anticipates driveway access to Atlas Pear Drive which would be extended with development south from HSC Parkway and be designed as Minor Collector. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was performed for the rezoning request and assumed the maximum multi-family density which would allow up to 334 units. The applicant intends to develop over 300 units with construction to be complete in 2021. All intersections studied in the TIA performed at an acceptable level of service except F&B Road at FM 2818 (Harvey Mitchell Parkway) which becomes a failing intersection in the background condition. The intersection of F&B Road at FM 2818 is built out except for the eastbound approach of F&B Road which constrains the capacity of the intersection by having only a single lane. As FM 2818 is a major roadway, the proposed development contributes less than 2% of the traffic to the overall intersection though would provide roughly 20% of the traffic on single-lane eastbound approach in the AM peak hour and about 5% of the eastbound traffic in the PM peak hour. Funding to improve the intersection or widen F&B Road to a future Minor Arterial has not yet been identified. Staff recommends that a condition be included with the rezoning that a turn lane be constructed on the eastbound approach of F&B Road at FM 2818 intersection to help mitigate the traffic added by the development to the intersection’s anticipated failing level of service. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request with the condition that a turn lane be constructed on the eastbound approach of F&B Road at FM 2818 intersection to help mitigate the traffic added by the development to the intersection’s anticipated failing level of service. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Background Information 2. Vicinity, Aerial & Small Area Map 3. Rezoning Exhibit 4. Zoning Map 5. Application NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 2, 2018 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: August 23, 2018 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Contacts in support: None Contacts in opposition: None Inquiry contacts: One at the time of staff report. ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Business Park Planned Development District (BioCorridor) Rural South Suburban Commercial Rural Rural East (across Turkey Creek Road) Business Park Rural Single-Family Residential West Business Park Planned Development District (BioCorridor) Rural DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: June 21, 1995 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation A-O Agricultural Open renamed to R Rural in 2013 Final Plat: Property is not platted Site development: Property is generally undeveloped. It is the site of a former horse stable. 11.14 AC.TURKEY CREEK ROAD - FM 2513EXISTING ZONING: RURAL - R PROPOSED ZONING: MULTI-FAMILY - MF TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: ZONING MAP 11.14 ACRES JOHN H. JONES SURVEY, A-26 COLLEGE STATION BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE: 1"=50' JUNE 2018 OWNER/DEVELOPER: LOVELESS ACRES L.C. 212 WINDSOR DR. BOERNE, TX 77806 832.221.7493 APPLICANT: TRADITIONS ACQUISITIONS PARTNERSHIP, LP 4250 SOUTH TRADITIONS DR. BRYAN, TX 77807 979.704.6395 VICINITY MAP HSC P A R K W A Y NOT TO SCALE TURKEY CREEK ROAD RAY M O N D S T O T Z E R P A R K W A Y LEGEND View.ashx %d×%d pixels https://collegestation.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=6398929&GUID=A0422627-0C2C-4D51-8125-1F0D7F7B7862[7/27/2018 1:05:58 PM] THIS APPLICATION NOT REQUIRED IF APPLYING ELECTRONICALLY FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.:________________ DATE SUBMITTED:_______________ TIME: STAFF: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING)APPLICATION Date of Optional Preapplication Conference GENERAL NAME OF PROJECT LOVELESS TRACT REZONING ADDRESS 8590 TURKEY CREEK RD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot,Block,Subdivision)A002601,JOHN H.JONES(ICL),TRACT 60,11.6 ACRES GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY,IF NOT PLATTED: APPROXIMATELY 500’SOUTH OF THE HSC PARKWAY AND TURKEY CREEK ROAD INTERSECTION TOTAL ACREAGE 11.14 ACRES APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name TRADITIONS ACQUISITIONS PARTNERSHIP,LPE-mail CSANDLIN@ATLASTX.COM Street Address 4250 SOUTH TRADITIONS DRIVE Phone Number 979.704.6395 Fax Number PROPERTY OWNER’S INFORMATION: Name LOVELESS ACRES LC -WILLIAM LOVELESS E-mail BILL@CHRISTISLIFEMINISTRIES.COM Street Address 212 WINDSOR DR. City BOERNE Phone Number 210.478.0618 State TX Fax Number Zip Code 78006 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Horse of Texas Aa’YM University’ MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~Rezoning Application Fee.(Refer to the Planning and Development Fee Schedule for all applicable fees) ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request. ~Copy of a fully dimensioned map a.Land affected b.Legal description of area of proposed change; c.Present zoning d.Zoning classification of all abutting land e.All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. ~Written legal description of subject property (metes &bounds or lot &block of subdivision,whichever is applicable). NOTE:If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council,another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial,except with permission of the Planning &Zoning Commission. City BRYAN State TX Zip Code 77807 Revised 1/17 Page 1 of 3 OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact,i.e.project manager,potential buyer,local contact,etc.): Name BOB LOVELESS E-mail bbloveless75©gmail.com Street Address 212 Windsor Drive City Boerne State Texas Zip Code 78006 Phone Number 832.221.7493 Fax Number __________________________________ This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated 10/11/2005 and recorded in Volume 7004_,Page104 of the Brazos County Official Records. Existing Zoning Rural -R Proposed Zoning Multi-Family -MF Present Use of Property Vacant Proposed Use of Property Multi-Family REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The development of the adjacent Blo Corridor area has commenced and there will be a demand for residential development to support and complement the research and manufacturing uses within the Bio Corridor.Also the RELLIS Campus development will increase the demand for residential land uses along the SH 47 and FM 60 Corridor. 2.Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,explain why the Plan is incorrect. The zone change is not in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan which has this property as Suburban Commercial.There is a significant amount of land available nearby in the Atlas Development for commercial uses. Removing the Suburban Commercial designation from this tract will not hinder opportunities for commercial development in the area. 3.How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? Some of the nearby property was either developed prior to annexation and is still zoned R-Rural or zoned R and has never been developed or is zoned PDD -Bio Corridor District.This change will be compatible with the desired land uses planned for the Bio Corridor.Multi-Family Zoning has been approved forproperty across Turkey Creek Road in the area. Revised 1/17 Page 2 of 3 4.Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The property has access to Turkey Creek Road and Atlas Pear Drive will be extended to the site and it will connect to HSC Parkway for vehicular access.The uses proposed will compliment the proposed uses for the Blo Corridor 5.Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Rural Zoning typically is for large lot single family residential use which is not desirable for property adjacent to the Blo Corridor 6.Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. There is no marketability for the Rural Zoning district as single family lot residential is not appropriate or feasible for this property. 7.List any other reasons to support this zone change. Development of Multi-Family residential near the Bio Corridor uses and the RELLIS Campus will be necessary. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf. Sidnature and title Date Revised 1/17 Print Form Page 3 of 3 Planning & Development Services  1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960  College Station, TX 77840 Office 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM August 2nd, 2018 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Laura Gray, Staff Planner SUBJECT: UDO Amendment – for the correction of minor text omissions, outdated references, and clerical errors. Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amendment to Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 2, “Development Review Bodies”, Section 2.8 “Administrator”; Article 3, “Development Review Procedures”, Section 3.12 “Building Permit” and Section 3.13 “Certificate of Occupancy”; Article 5, “District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards”, Section 5.2 “Residential Dimensional Standards”; Article 7, “General Development Standards”, Section 7.3 “Off-Street Parking Standards”, Section 7.6 “Landscaping and Tree Protection”, and Section 7.10 “Non-Residential Architectural Standards; and Article 8, “Subdivision Design and Improvements,” Section 8.3. “General Requirements and Minimum Standards of Design for Subdivisions within the City Limits”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, to correct minor text omissions, correct an outdated reference, and address clerical errors. Case# ORDA2018-000007. Background: The purpose of this proposed ordinance is to correct several known outstanding clerical errors, outdated references, and text omissions in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). These minor items were identified and compiled by the City’s Planning and Development Service’s staff to put forward in this ordinance. The proposed ordinance would:  Reestablish the Administrator’s ‘Final Action’ list, found at UDO Sec. 2.8 (4.), by reinstating three items that were erroneously removed from the list on February 22, 2018 when City Ordinance 2018-3991 “Standards as Related to Screening, Architectural Features, and Color Palette” was enacted. The three items had been previously approved by Council. Planning & Development Services  1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960  College Station, TX 77840 Office 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 The preliminary plan authority was authorized in Ordinance 2017-3967 and the site plan and minor Wolf Pen Creek project authority originated with the first Unified Development Ordinance in 2003.  Reinstate the percentage of change that would trigger the necessity to bring the building materials on an existing building’s facade into compliance with the UDO. This item was modified on February 22, 2018 when City Ordinance 2018-3991 “Standards as Related to Screening, Architectural Features, and Color Palette” was enacted. The percentage had been previously approved by Council when Ordinance 2018-3970 was enacted on January 11, 2018.  Clarify the ‘Average Lot Area per Dwelling Unit’, found in the Residential Dimensional Standard Table of UDO Sec. 5.2, by adding the text ‘Min.’ to the average lot area per dwelling unit text. Correct a typographical error in the table’s notes. Over the years, subdivision applicants have incorrectly believed that they could not have an average lot area greater than the area identified in the table.  Remove a typographical error (double comma) from UDO Sec. 7.3 and remove outdated International Building Code references from Sec.3.12 (A.) Sec. 3.13 (A), (C.), and (D.).  Remove an outdated landscape point calculation example and replace it with an updated example.  Complete the list of zoning districts where cluster subdivisions are allowed. The WE Wellborn Estate and WRS Wellborn Restricted Suburban zoning districts were not included in the UDO Sec 8.3 H.)(4.)(c.)“Where Allowed” list when City was enacted Ordinance 2016- 3792 on July 28, 2016. This was an oversight for, although these districts were missing from the “Where Allowed” list, the ordinance clearly allowed for cluster subdivisions in these districts as evidenced by the permitted use table in UDO Sec 6.3(C.) and the Specific District Standards discussion in UDO Sec 8.3 ((H.)(4.)(e.). Supporting Materials: 1. Section 2.8.Administrator Ordinance Redline. 2. Section 3.12. Building Permit Ordinance Redline. 3. Section 3.13 Certificate of Occupancy Ordinance Redline. 4. Section 5.2 Residential Dimensional Standards Ordinance Redline. 5. Section 7.3 Off-Street Parking Standards Ordinance Redline. 6. Section 7.6 Landscaping and Tree Protection. 7. Section 8.3 General Requirements and Minimum Standards of design for Subdivisions within the City Limits Ordinance Redline. 1 Sec. 2.8. - Administrator. B. Powers and Duties. …… 4. Final Action. The Administrator shall review and take final action on the following: a. Sign permits; b. Site plans (not Wolf Pen Creek District site plans); b. c. Architectural reviews; c. d. Administrative adjustments; e. Preliminary Plans as set forth in Section 3.4, Plat Review, of this UDO; d. f. Minor and amending plats; e. g. Determination of building plot (Section 7.2, General Provisions); h. Minor Wolf Pen Creek District projects; f. i. Certificate of Appropriateness Routine Maintenance Work reviews; g. j. Determination regarding applicability of plat requirements; and h. k. Alternative parking plans (Section 7.3, Off-Street Parking). 2 Sec. 3.12. - Building Permit. A. Building Permit Required. No building or other structure shall hereafter be erected, moved, added to, structurally altered, repaired, demolished, or occupancy changed without a permit issued by the Building Official except in conformity with the provisions of this Section and the 2006 International Building Code as adopted and amended by the City, unless otherwise provided for in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances. No Building Permit issued under the provisions of this Article for land use or construction in the City shall be considered valid unless signed by the Building Official. 3 Sec. 3.13. - Certificate of Occupancy. A. Applicability. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be required for any of the following: 1. Occupancy and use of a building hereafter erected or enlarged; 2. Change in use of an existing building to a different Use Category; 3. Any change in a nonconforming use or structure; or 4. As required by the 2006 International Building Code as adopted and amended, Section 110. B. Application. Once all required building inspections have been reviewed by the Building Official and he finds no violation of the provisions of the Code, the Building Official shall issue a Certificate of Occupancy for the structure or use. C. Review and Action by Building Official. Upon the request for a Certificate of Occupancy, the Building Official shall inspect the use or structure. If the Building Official determines that the use or structure complies with all applicable provisions of the 2006 International Building Code as adopted and amended and this UDO, a Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued. D. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. Pending the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the Building Official. The Temporary Certificate of Occupancy shall be valid for a period established by the Building Official, pending completion of an addition or during partial occupancy of a structure and as provided in Section 110 of the 2006 International Building Code as adopted and amended. 4 Sec. 5.2. - Residential Dimensional Standards. The following table establishes dimensional standards that shall be applied within the Residential Zoning Districts, unless otherwise identified in this UDO. Residential Zoning Districts R WE E(N)(P) WRS RS(J) GS(J)(P) T D MHP MF MU Accessory Structures Non-Clustered Residential Zoning Districts Min. Average Lot Area per Dwelling Unit (DU) 3 acres Average 2 acres 1 Acre 20,000 SF 10,000 SF Average 5,000 SF 2,000 SF 3,500 SF >(L) None None Refer to Section 6.5, Accessory Uses(L) Absolute Min. Lot Area per Dwelling Unit (DU) 2 Acres 2 acres 1 Acre 20,000SF 6,500 SF 5,000 SF 2,000 SF 3,500 SF None None Min. Lot Width None 100 (M) 100'(M) 70' 70' 50' None 35'/DU(E) None None Min. Lot Depth None None None None None 100' None 100' None None Min. Front Setback(H) 50' 30' 30' 25' 25' 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) 15' None Max. Front Setback N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15'(O) Min. Side Setback 20' 10' 10' 7.5' 7.5' 7.5' (A) 7.5'(C) (A)(B) None Min. Side Street Setback 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' None Max. Side Street Setback N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15'(O) Min. Side Setback between Structures(B) N/A 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 7.5' 15' 7.5' None Min. Rear Setback(L) 50' 20' 20' 20' 20' 20' 20' 20'(F) 20' 20' Max. Height 35'(G)(K)(L) 35'(G)(K) 35'(G)(K)(L) 35'(G)(K) 35'(G)(K)(L) 2.5 Stories/35'(G)(K)(L) 35'(G)(K)(L) 2.5 Stories/35'(G)(K)(L) (G)(L) (G)(L) Minimum Number of Stories N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 Storie s Max. Dwelling Units/Acre (Subdivision Gross) 0.33 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.00 8.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 30.0 N/A N/A 5 Notes : (A) A minimum side setback of seven and one -half (7.5) feet is required for each building or group of contiguous buildings. (B) Lot line construction on interior lots with no side yard or setback is allowed only where the building is covered by fire protection on the site or by dedicated right -of-way or easement. (C) Zero lot line construction of a residence is allowed where property on both sides of a lot line is owned and/or developed simultaneously by single party. Development under lot line construction requires prior approval by the Zoning Official. In no case shall a single -family residence or duplex be built within fifteen (15) feet of another primary structure. See Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements, for more information. (D) Minimum front setback may be reduced to fifteen (15) feet when approved rear access is provided, or when side yard or rear yard parking is provided. Min. Dwelling Units/Acre N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 N/A Clustered Residential Zoning Districts Min. Average Lot Area per Dwelling Unit (DU) N/A 1 Acre 20,000 SF Average 8,000 SF 8,000 SF Average 3,750 SF (P) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Absolute Min. Lot Area per Dwelling Unit (DU) 1 Acre 10,000 SF 8,000 SF 6,500 SF 3,750 SF Min. Lot Width 100' (M) 100'(M) None None None Min. Lot Depth None None None None None Min. Front Setback(H) Refer to Section 8.3.H.4, Cluster Development, Specific District Standards Min. Side Setback Min. Street Side Setback Min. Side Setback between Structures(B) Min. Rear Setback(L) Max. Height 35'(G)(K) 35'(G)(K) 35'(G)(K) 35'(G)(K) 2.5 Stories/35'(G)(K)(L) Max. Dwelling Units/Acre (Subdivision Gross) 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.00 8.0 6 (E) The minimum lot width for a duplex dwelling may be reduced to thirty (30) feet per dwelling unit when all required off-street parking is provided in the rear or side yard. (F) Minimum rear setback may be reduced to fifteen (15) feet when parking is provided in the front yard or side yard. (G) Shall abide by Section 7.2.H, Height. (H) Reference Section 7.1.2.D.1.e for lots created by plat prior to July 15, 1970 and designated as Neighborhood Conservation in the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. (I) Reference Section 7.2.D.1.b for lots with approved rear access. (J) For areas within a Single-Family Overlay District, reference the Neighborhood Prevailing Standards Overlay Districts Section in Article 5 or the Ordinance authorizing the rezoning for Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts. (K) Public, civic, and institutional structures shall have a maximum building height of fifty (50) feet in these districts. (L) Reference Easterwood Field Airport Zoning Ordinance regarding height limitations. (M) In subdivisions built to rural street standards, lots shall be a minimum of one hundred (100) feet in width. There is no minimum lot width in cluster subdivisions built to urban street standards. (N) Estate lots that are part of a subdivision existing on or before September 12, 2013 are not permitted to use Cluster Development Standards without rezoning approval, which incorporates the entire subdivision. (O) For MU zoned properties, maximum side street and front setbacks may be measured from the edge of a public easement when it is in excess of the maximum setback. Maximum setbacks may be increased to up to eighty-five (85) feet to accommodate a parking lot between the structure and the street. Maximum setback requirements may be fulfilled through the use of plazas, outdoor dining, and bicycle parking. (P) Reference Section 8.3.H.4.e when using the cluster option in the Wellborn Community Plan area. 7 Section 7.3 Off-Street Parking Standards. C. Dimensions, Access, and Location. ……. 3. For all detached single-family uses other than as set forth in subsection 2 above,, at the time of construction, reconstruction, or addition to the number of existing bedrooms, parking shall be located in the areas described below: 8 Section 7.6 Landscaping and Tree Protection ….. E. Landscape/Streetscape Plan Requirements 9. Landscape Information. a. Landscape points required for site and calculations shown in the landscape legend. b. A legend showing the size, type (canopy, non-canopy, shrub) and points claimed for proposed landscaping. c. Location of landscape plants on plan identified by a symbol defined in a landscape legend (see sample legend below). City of College Station SAMPLE LEGEND LANDSCAPING POINT CALCULATIONS SYMBOL SIZE NAME & TYPE QUANTITY POINT VALUE POINT 8” AND LARGER EXISTING W/BARRICADE LIVE OAK TREE (Quercus Virginiana) Canopy tree 2 300 600 4” TO 8” AND LARGER EXISTING W/BARRICADE LIVE OAK TREE (Quercus Virginiana) Canopy tree 13 200 2,600 2” TO 14.5” CALIPER EXISTING W/0 BARRICADE LIVE OAK TREE (Quercus Virginiana) Canopy tree 8 35 280 1.25 “ CALIPER AND LARGER TREE CREPE MYRTLE (Lagerstroemia indica) Non-canopy tree 6 (NEW) 40 240 5 GAL WAX LEAF LIGUSTRUM (Ligustrum texanum) Shrub 46 (NEW) 10 460 NOTE: Symbols are for reference. Any symbols used must be distinguishable at any scale. BARRICADE FOR INDICATED TREES TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH 48” HIGH ORANGE PLASTIC CONSTRUCTION NETTING AND SECURED TO STEEL T-POSTS. BARRICADE TO BE PLACED IN A CIRCLE AROUND INDICATED TREES A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 1’ FOR EVERY 1” CALIPER OF TREE. BARRICADE MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO ANY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY AS WELL AS THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. STREETSCAPE: (136.57’ / 50) X 300 PTS = 820 PTS 136.57-LINEAR FEET x 6 = 819.42 = 820 POINTS (136.57’ / 25) = 6 CANOPY TREES 136.57-LINEAR FEET / 25 = 5.46 = 6 CANOPY TREES POINTS PER PROJECT AREA: 9 26,416.3 SQUARE FEET OF SITE AREA 26,416.3 / 1,000 = 26.42 26.42 x 30 = 792.6 = 793 POINTS TOTAL POINTS REQUIRED: 1,613 10 Section 7.10 Non-Residential Architectural Standards. C. Standards for Non-Residential Structures. ….. 3. Building Mass and Design. ……. e. Roof and Roofline Design. ……. 4. Building Materials. ……. e. Existing buildings may continue to utilize materials other than those listed provided that any material replacement is for maintenance purposes only and the existing material is continued. Any material change or replacement of more than ten (10) fifty (50) percent of the total area of a façade, including on a cumulative basis, shall require that all building materials be brought into compliance on that façade. 11 Section 8.3 General Requirements and Minimum Standards of design for Subdivisions within the City Limits. H. Lots. ……. 4. Cluster Development. ……. c. Where Allowed. Cluster developments are allowed in residential WE Wellborn Estate, E Estate, RS Restricted Suburban, WRS Wellborn Restricted Suburban, and GS General Suburban zoning districts. 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Lance Simms, Director of Planning & Development Services DATE: 2 August 2018 SUBJECT: Single-Family Height Protection Item Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix “A”, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 7.2.H, “Height,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas. Background April 5, 2018 - In response to a future agenda item request, staff presented an overview of UDO Section 7.2.H to the Planning & Zoning Commission. The Commission expressed a desire to make changes to the section and staff committed to gather feedback as part of the community engagement meetings scheduled for April 30th. April 30, 2018 - Two community engagement meetings were held to gather input on a number of neighborhood protection proposals, including UDO Section 7.2.H, Height. Attendees were able to provide feedback via paper surveys at both community engagement meetings and an online survey was also open for a period of two weeks following the meetings. June 21, 2018 - Staff provided the Commission with a summary of the results from the community engagement meetings and online surveys and solicited feedback regarding any possible changes to Section 7.2.H. Following discussion, there was general consensus among the Commission that the existing language lacks clarity. The Commission expressed a desire to simplify the ordinance language and explore different ways to measure building height. There was also a consensus to keep the 2:1 slope requirement. June 28, 2018 - Staff provided the City Council with a summary of the survey results and solicited feedback regarding any possible changes to Section 7.2.H. Following discussion, the Council directed staff to simplify/clarify the UDO language and update the illustration. There was also a consensus to keep the current requirements. Summary of Changes Below is a summary of the changes included in the draft ordinance:  Rearranged subsections so the text flows in a logical manner (begins with purpose statement, followed by requirements and exceptions)  Reformatted and retitled sections to make the text more user-friendly (“Distance” now called “Building Setback Requirement”, “Height” now called “Slope Requirement”, etc.)  Simplified language to provide clarity (for example, see revised language in 7.2.H.3. “Building Setback Requirement” and 7.2.H.4. “Slope Requirement”)  Included updated graphic  Tweaked roof language to provide clarity regarding “sloped” roofs (see 7.2.H.5.a) Next Steps At the August 2nd Commission meeting, staff will present the attached proposed version of UDO Section 7.2.H and seek a recommendation from the Commission. This item is also scheduled to be considered by the City Council at their August 23rd meeting. Attachments 1. Current Version 2. Redlined Version 3. Proposed Version Sec. 7.2. - General Provisions. H. Height. 1. Building Height . For purposes of this subsection H. building height refers to the vertical distance measured from the finished grade, or the base flood elevation where applicable, and the highest of the following points: a. The average height level between the eaves and ridge line of a gable, hip, or gambrel roof; b. The highest point of a mansard roof; c. The highest point of the coping of a flat roof; d. The highest point of equipment located on top of a structure such as satellite dishes, heating and air conditioning units. 2. Detached Single-Family. For purposes of this subsection H. detached single-family shall refer to free standing single family residential units that provide complete independent living facilities for one (1) family including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking, eating and sanitation. 3. Low-Density Residential Protection . a. Purpose . The purpose of low density residential height protection is to provide a visual barrier between low density residential uses and districts from adjacent higher-density residential and non-residential uses. This is accomplished by regulating the height and distance of such higher-density or non-residential uses when adjacent to low density residential uses and districts to help mitigate negative impacts. b. Regulations . 1. Distance . a. No multi-family or non-residential structure shall be located to any property line of an adjacent tract of land on which there's a detached single-family, manufactured home park or townhouse use or district nearer than a horizontal distance (B to C) that is equal to at least twice the vertical distance (height, A to B) of the multi- family or non-residential structure, as illustrated in the graphic below. b. Partial exception. For developments designed to be mixed use or that are within a redevelopment district as shown on the Future Land Use and Character Map of the City's Comprehensive Plan, only the structure(s) nearest to the property line of an adjacent tract of land on which there's a detached single-family, manufactured home park or townhouse use or district shall meet the distance standard recited herein. 2. Height . a. General height requirements. No multi-family or non-residential structure shall be located to any property line of an adjacent tract of land on which there's a detached single-family, manufactured home park or townhouse use or district unless the height requirements herein are met. No multi-family or non-residential structures shall penetrate the height of an imaginary line, illustrated by the inclined plane in the graphic above, connecting points A and C, which is the hypotenuse of the right triangle formed when calculating the minimum distance requirements set forth above. b. Additional height requirements for SC and WC. In addition to the height limitations set forth above in this subsection, the following additional height limitations apply in SC Suburban Commercial and WC Wellborn Commercial zoning: 1. No building may exceed two (2) stories; 2. Maximum eave height shall be twenty-four (24) feet; 3. Maximum overall height to peak of roof shall be thirty-five (35) feet; 4. Any structure with an eave height over fifteen (15) feet will be constructed to resemble a two-story façade; 5. Buildings located closest to detached single-family, manufactured home park or townhouse use or district and that are within fifty (50) feet of the property line are limited to one-story in height with an eave maximum of twelve (12) feet; and 6. An eave maximum of fourteen (14) feet in height is permitted when mechanical equipment is housed within a mezzanine. c. Exceptions to height requirements. Unless otherwise stated in this UDO, the height limitations herein shall not apply to any of the following: 1. Structures located in NG, RDD, and P-MUD districts; 2. When the detached single family, manufactured home park or townhome use on the adjacent tract is nonconforming; 3. When the use on the adjacent tract is agricultural; 4. Utility structures such as elevated water storage tanks and electrical transmission lines; 5. Architectural elements such as flagpoles, belfries, cupolas, spires, domes, monuments, chimneys, bulkheads, elevators, or chimney flues; or any other similar structure extending above the roof of any building where such structure does not occupy more than thirty-three (33) percent of the surface area of the roof; and 6. Residential radio/television receiving antennas. Sec. 7.2. - General Provisions. H. Low-Density Residential Height Protection. 1 Purpose . The purpose of low-density residential height protection is to provide a visual barrier between low-density residential uses and districts from adjacent higher-density residential and non-residential uses. This is accomplished by regulating the building height and setback of such higher-density or non-residential uses when adjacent to low density residential uses and districts to help mitigate negative impacts. 2. Detached Single-Family Meaning. For purposes of this subsection H. detached single-family shall refer to free standing single family residential units that provide complete independent living facilities for one (1) family including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking, eating and sanitation. 3. Building Setback Requirement. a. A multi-family or non-residential structure located adjacent to a tract, parcel, or lot of land on which there is a detached single-family home, manufactured home park, or townhouse use or district shall be setback a minimum distance (B to C) equal to twice the vertical distance (height, A to B) of the multi-family or non-residential structure, as illustrated in the graphic below. b. Partial exception. For developments designed to be mixed-use or within a redevelopment district as shown on the Future Land Use and Character Map of the City's Comprehensive Plan, only the structure(s) nearest to the property line of an adjacent tract of land on which there's a detached single-family home, manufactured home park, or townhouse use or district shall be required to meet the setback recited herein. 4. Slope Requirement a. A multi-family or non-residential structure located adjacent to a tract, parcel, or lot of land on which there is a detached single-family home, manufactured home park, or townhouse use or district shall not penetrate an imaginary line formed by a 1;2 slope as illustrated by the inclined plane in the graphic above, connecting points A and C, Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.94", First line: 0" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.63", Hanging: 0.31" Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.94", Hanging: 0.31" Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Indent: Left: 1" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.63", Hanging: 0.25" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.95" which is the hypotenuse of the right triangle formed when calculating the 1:2 slope set forth above. Height. 15. Building Height . For purposes of this subsection H., building height refers to the vertical distance measured from the finished grade, or the base flood elevation where applicable, and the highest of the following points: a. The average (mean) height level between the eaves and ridge line of a sloped roof (gable, hip, shed,or gambrel, etc.)roof; b. The deck line highest point of a mansard roof; c. The highest point of the coping of a flat roof; d. The highest point of equipment located on top of a structure such as satellite dishes, heating and air conditioning units. Exception: Unless otherwise stated in this UDO, the height limitations herein shall not apply to any of the following: 1. Structures located in NG, RDD, and P-MUD districts; 2. When the detached single family, manufactured home park or townhome use on the adjacent tract is nonconforming; 3. When the use on the adjacent tract is agricultural; 4. Utility structures such as elevated water storage tanks and electrical transmission lines; 5. Architectural elements such as flagpoles, belfries, cupolas, spires, domes, monuments, chimneys, bulkheads, elevators, or chimney flues; or any other similar structure extending above the roof of any building where such structure does not occupy more than thirty-three (33) percent of the surface area of the roof; and 6. Residential radio/television receiving antennas. 26. Detached Single-Family. For purposes of this subsection H. detached single-family shall refer to free standing single family residential units that provide complete independent living facilities for one (1) family including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking, eating and sanitation. 3. Low-Density Residential Protection . a. Purpose . The purpose of low density residential height protection is to provide a visual barrier between low density residential uses and districts from adjacent higher-density residential and non- residential uses. This is accomplished by regulating the height and distance of such higher- Formatted: Normal Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Normal Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: list1 density or non-residential uses when adjacent to low density residential uses and districts to help mitigate negative impacts. b. Regulations . 1. Distance . a. No multi-family or non-residential structure shall be located to any property line of an adjacent tract of land on which there's a detached single-family, manufactured home park or townhouse use or district nearer than a horizontal distance (B to C) that is equal to at least twice the vertical distance (height, A to B) of the multi-family or non-residential structure, as illustrated in the graphic below. b. Partial exception. For developments designed to be mixed use or that are within a redevelopment district as shown on the Future Land Use and Character Map of the City's Comprehensive Plan, only the structure(s) nearest to the property line of an adjacent tract of land on which there's a detached single-family, manufactured home park or townhouse use or district shall meet the distance standard recited herein. 2. Height . a. General height requirements. No multi-family or non-residential structure shall be located to any property line of an adjacent tract of land on which there's a detached single-family, manufactured home park or townhouse use or district unless the height requirements herein are met. No multi-family or non-residential structures shall penetrate the height of an imaginary line, illustrated by the inclined plane in the graphic above, connecting points A and C, which is the hypotenuse of the right triangle formed when calculating the minimum distance requirements set forth above. b7.. Additional hHeight rRequirements for WC Wellborn Commercial. In addition to the height limitations set forth above in this subsection, the following additional height limitations apply in WC Wellborn Commercial zoning: 1a.. No building may exceed two (2) stories; 2b.. Maximum eave height shall be twenty-four (24) feet; 3c.. Maximum overall height to peak of roof shall be thirty-five (35) feet; 4d.. Any structure with an eave height over fifteen (15) feet will be constructed to resemble a two-story facade; 5e.. Buildings located closest to detached single-family, manufactured home park or townhouse use or district and that are within fifty (50) feet of the property line are limited to one-story in height with an eave maximum of twelve (12) feet; and 6f.. An eave maximum of fourteen (14) feet in height is permitted when mechanical equipment is housed within a mezzanine. c. Exceptions to height requirements. Unless otherwise stated in this UDO, the height limitations herein shall not apply to any of the following: 1. Structures located in NG, RDD, and P-MUD districts; Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Indent: First line: 0" Formatted: List 3 2. When the detached single family, manufactured home park or townhome use on the adjacent tract is nonconforming; 3. When the use on the adjacent tract is agricultural; 4. Utility structures such as elevated water storage tanks and electrical transmission lines; 5. Architectural elements such as flagpoles, belfries, cupolas, spires, domes, monuments, chimneys, bulkheads, elevators, or chimney flues; or any other similar structure extending above the roof of any building where such structure does not occupy more than thirty-three (33) percent of the surface area of the roof; and 6. Residential radio/television receiving antennas. Sec. 7.2. - General Provisions. H. Low-Density Residential Height Protection. 1 Purpose. The purpose of low-density residential height protection is to provide a visual barrier between low-density residential uses and districts from adjacent higher-density residential and non-residential uses. This is accomplished by regulating the building height and setback of such higher-density or non-residential uses when adjacent to low density residential uses and districts to help mitigate negative impacts. 2. Detached Single-Family Meaning. For purposes of this subsection H. detached single-family shall refer to free standing single family residential units that provide complete independent living facilities for one (1) family including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking, eating and sanitation. 3. Building Setback Requirement. a. A multi-family or non-residential structure located adjacent to a tract, parcel, or lot of land on which there is a detached single-family home, manufactured home park, or townhouse use or district shall be setback a minimum distance (B to C) equal to twice the vertical distance (height, A to B) of the multi-family or non-residential structure, as illustrated in the graphic below. b. Partial exception. For developments designed to be mixed-use or within a redevelopment district as shown on the Future Land Use and Character Map of the City's Comprehensive Plan, only the structure(s) nearest to the property line of an adjacent tract of land on which there's a detached single-family home, manufactured home park, or townhouse use or district shall be required to meet the setback recited herein. 4. Slope Requirement a. A multi-family or non-residential structure located adjacent to a tract, parcel, or lot of land on which there is a detached single-family home, manufactured home park, or townhouse use or district shall not penetrate an imaginary line formed by a 1:2 slope as illustrated by the inclined plane in the graphic above, connecting points A and C, which is the hypotenuse of the right triangle formed when calculating the 1:2 slope set forth above. 5. Building Height. For purposes of this subsection H., building height refers to the vertical distance measured from the finished grade, or the base flood elevation where applicable, and the highest of the following points: a. The average (mean) height level between the eaves and ridge line of a sloped roof (gable, hip, shed, gambrel, etc.); b. The deck line of a mansard roof; c. The highest point of the coping of a flat roof; or d. The highest point of equipment located on top of a structure such as satellite dishes, heating and air conditioning units. Exception: Unless otherwise stated in this UDO, the height limitations herein shall not apply to any of the following: 1. Structures located in NG, RDD, and P-MUD districts; 2. When the detached single family, manufactured home park or townhome use on the adjacent tract is nonconforming; 3. When the use on the adjacent tract is agricultural; 4. Utility structures such as elevated water storage tanks and electrical transmission lines; 5. Architectural elements such as flagpoles, belfries, cupolas, spires, domes, monuments, chimneys, bulkheads, elevators, or chimney flues; or any other similar structure extending above the roof of any building where such structure does not occupy more than thirty-three (33) percent of the surface area of the roof; and 6. Residential radio/television receiving antennas. 6. Additional Height Requirements for WC Wellborn Commercial. In addition to the height limitations set forth above in this subsection, the following height limitations apply in WC Wellborn Commercial zoning: a. No building may exceed two (2) stories; b. Maximum eave height shall be twenty-four (24) feet; c. Maximum overall height to peak of roof shall be thirty-five (35) feet; d. Any structure with an eave height over fifteen (15) feet will be constructed to resemble a two-story facade; e. Buildings located closest to detached single-family, manufactured home park or townhouse use or district and that are within fifty (50) feet of the property line are limited to one-story in height with an eave maximum of twelve (12) feet; and f. An eave maximum of fourteen (14) feet in height is permitted when mechanical equipment is housed within a mezzanine.