Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/21/2013 - Minutes - Planning & Zoning CommissionMINUTES STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Holm- © f Workshop Meeting February 21, 2013, 6:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jodi Warner, Jim Ross, Vergel Gay, Bo Miles, and Jerome Rektorik COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Brad Corrier CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: None CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Alan Gibbs, Carol Cotter, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert, Matt Robinson, Morgan Hester, Teresa Rogers, Venessa Garza, Erika Bridges, Joe Guerra, Adam Falco, Jennifer Pate, and Brittany Caldwell 1. Call the meeting to order. Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. Chairman Ashfield spoke in regards to Consent Agenda Item 4.1 stating that Commissioner Ross was present and the absence request was for Commissioner Corrier. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding Consent Agenda Item 4.6 and Regular Agenda Items 6 — 10. 3. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff. • Final Pat — Amending Plat — Pebble Creek Phase 9C — 51 PDD Lots — 5102 Stonewater Loop (M. Robinson) Senior Planner Robinson reviewed the above - referenced Amending Plat. 4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the status of items within the 2013 P &Z Plan of Work (see attached). (J. Schubert) Principal Planner Schubert gave update regarding 2013 P &Z Plan of Work. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the Plan of Work. 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update of development in the Northgate area. (B. Cowell) February 21, 2013 P &Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2 Executive Director Cowell updated the Commission on development in the Northgate area. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the development. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the P &Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. • Tuesday, February 26, 2013 — South Knoll Neighborhood Plan Public Meeting (On- Street Parking) — South Knoll Elementary School cafeteria — 7:00 p.m. • Thursday, February 28, 2013 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison — Rektorik) • Thursday, March 7, 2013 — Planning & Zoning Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. Chairman Ashfield reviewed the upcoming meeting dates with the Planning and Zoning Commission. 7. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, South Knoll Neighborhood Plan Resource Team, BioCorridor Board, Zoning District Subcommittee, and Wellborn District Plan Resource Team. Commissioner Warner gave an update on the South Knoll Neighborhood Plan. Commissioner Rektorik updated the Commission on the Zoning District Subcommittee. Commissioner Miles gave an update on the BioCorridor Board. Chairman Ashfield and Senior Planner Robinson gave an update regarding the Wellborn District Plan. 8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion regarding future agenda items. 9. Adj ourn. The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. A e Mike Ashfield, hairma Planning & Zoning Commission tes dwV Brittany ald ll, Ad in. Support Specialist Planning & Deyvelopment Services February 21, 2013 P &Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 2 CITY OF C011.1'GE STATION MINUTES Home " hw `' o ' Aft "` PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting February 21, 2013, 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jodi Warner, Jim Ross, Vergel Gay, Bo Miles, and Jerome Rektorik COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Brad Corrier CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Julie Schultz CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Alan Gibbs, Carol Cotter, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert, Matt Robinson, Morgan Hester, Teresa Rogers, Venessa Garza, Erika Bridges, Joe Guerra, Adam Falco, Jennifer Pate, and Brittany Caldwell Call Meeting to Order Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Hear Citizens No one spoke. 4. Consent Agenda All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. 4.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action on Absence Requests from meetings. • Jim Ross — February 21, 2013 4.2 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting Minutes. • January 17, 2012 — Workshop • January 17, 2012 — Regular 4.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for Indian Lakes Phase 14 consisting of 5 residential lots on approximately 6 acres generally located South of Anasazi Bluff Drive in the Indian Lakes Subdivision, approximately one mile southwest of State Highway 6 South in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case # 12- 00500198 (M. Hester) February 21, 2013 P &Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 5 4.4 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for The Barracks II Section 101 Subdivision consisting of 72 lots on approximately 8.6 acres located at 3156 Haupt Road, generally located between Old Wellborn Road and Holleman Drive South, north of the Buena Vida Subdivision. Case # 12- 00500180 (M. Robinson) 4.5 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the College Station High School Subdivision consisting of 1 lot on approximately 62 acres located at 4002 Victoria Avenue, generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Victoria Avenue and Barron Road. Case # 12- 00500265 (M. Robinson) 4.6 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the Traditions Phase 23 Subdivision consisting of two lots and a common area on approximately 36 acres located at 8751 Health Science Center Parkway, generally located east of SH 47 and north of Raymond Stotzer Parkway. Case # 13- 00900005 (M. Hitchcock) Chairman Ashfield spoke in regards to Consent Agenda Item 4.1 stating that Commissioner Ross was present and the absence request was for Commissioner Corrier. Commissioner Miles motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1 — 4.6 with the condition that 4.1 is changed to Commissioner Corrier. Commissioner Warner seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda. 6. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for College Heights Lot 1 R, Block B being a replat of College Heights Lot 1 and 5' of 2 and Part of Alley, Lot 2 (75' of), Lot 11 (30' of) & 20' of 12, Lot 12 (Part of), Block B consisting of one GC General Commercial lot on approximately 1.1 acres located at 303 A & B University Drive East, 410 Nimitz Street, 411 and 413 Eisenhower Street. Case # 12- 00500267 (M. Hester) Staff Planner Hester presented the replat and recommended approval. Natalie Ruiz, IPS Group, stated that she and Joe Schultz, with Schultz Engineering, were available for questions. Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. February 21, 2013 P &Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 5 Commissioner Ross motioned to approve the replat. Commissioner Rektorik seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). 7. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Summit Crossing Lots 1R -20R and Common Area "Al" & "B1 ", Block 4 being a replat of Summit Crossing Lots 1 -24 and Common Area "A" & "B ", Block 4 consisting of twenty residential lots on approximately 2.1 acres located at 1702 -1748 Lonetree Drive. Case # 12- 00500275 (M. Hester) Staff Planner Hester presented the replat and recommended approval. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the replat. Rabon Metcalf, RME Engineering, stated that the homes in this development would be similar to the townhomes that are developed across the street. Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve the replat. Commissioner Miles seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). 8. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Northpoint Crossing Subdivision being a replat of North Park Block 2 Lots 3 -10, North Park Section Il Lot 5, Meadowland Addition Lots 1 -19, 4.82 -acre tract J.E. Scott League, 0.17 -acre tract J.E. Scott League A -50, and 0.54 -acre tract of abandoned Meadowland Street Right -of -Way consisting of two PDD Planned Development District lots on approximately 10.3 acres located at 410 -420 Texas Avenue, 1403 -1405 University Drive, and 100 -147 Meadowland Street, excluding 130 -134 Meadowland Street. Case # 13- 00900021 (J. Schubert) Principal Planner Schubert presented the replat and recommended approval. Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, stated that she was available for questions. Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. Commissioner Gay motioned to approve the replat. Commissioner Miles seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). February 21, 2013 P &Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 5 9. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an amendment to Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance ", Section 4.2, "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by rezoning approximately 6.3 acres located at 301 Southwest Parkway from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District to amend the Concept Plan. Case # 12- 00500247 (T. Rogers) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the February 28, 2013 City Council Meeting - subject to change) Staff Planner Rogers presented the rezoning and recommended approval with the conditions that a public access easement be provided to accommodate the multi -use path and a drainage easement be provided from the terminus of the multi -use path to the property line. There was general discussion amongst the Commission and Staff regarding the floodplain on the property. Alton Ofczarzak, applicant, stated that he was available for questions. Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. Commissioner Miles motioned to recommend approval with the condition that a public access easement be provided to accommodate the multi -use path and a drainage easement be provided from the terminus of the multi -use path to the property line. Commissioner Rektorik seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). 10. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a recommendation to City Council on the recommendations made by the Joint Task Force on Neighborhood Parking. (T. Rogers) Staff Planner Rogers presented the recommendations made by the Joint Task Force on Neighborhood Parking. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the fire hydrant protection zones. Eric Hurt, City of College Station Fire Marshall, spoke regarding the fire hydrant protection zones and stated that the Fire Department does not feel that they should be mandatory because it is not a major issue. They are more concerned with streets being congested which makes it difficult for fire trucks to get through. Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. February 21, 2013 P &Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5 Steve Strong, 2503 Whispering Oaks Circle, College Station, Texas, asked that the definition of redevelopment be included in the recommendation to City Council. He also asked that the amount of front yard allowed for parking be researched further. Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, stated that she would like the fire hydrant protection zones removed from the recommendation. Heath Phillips, 2440 Stone Castle, College Station, Texas, said that he would like for townhomes to be excluded from having to allow 50% of their front yard for parking. He also said that he believes that more issues would be created with fire hydrant protection zones. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. Commissioner Warner said that enforcement is key and citations need to be written to resolve parking problems. Commissioner Ross motioned to recommend approval of the recommendations made by the Joint Task Force on Neighborhood Parking with the exception of fire hydrant protection zones being required. Commissioner Warner seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). 11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Executive Director Cowell stated that Staff Planner Lauren Hovde had resigned and Civil Engineer Danielle Singh received the award for Young Engineer of the Year from Texas Society of Professional Engineers, Brazos Chapter. 12. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 8:21 p.m. A p e 0 Mike Ashfield, hairma Planning & Zoning Com ission A�e ti B r Cald I , A in. Support Specialist Planning & Development Services February 21, 2013 P &Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION GUEST REGISTER MEETING DATE l ADDRESS 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. d- 0'31 (L S . 7 7�'�(� 2,reA 6 f J /, . 2- 25 NAME s HUGH W. LINDSAY Attorney 412 Tarrow Street College Station, Texas 77840 Telephone Facsimile (979) 260 -8734 (979) 260 -8736 February 20, 2013 City of College Station Planning and Zoning Commission 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77840 RE: Joint Neighborhood Parking Task Force Recommendations Report I am in receipt of the above referenced report you are to consider February 21, 2013. 1 am enclosing a paper concerning Parking in the City of College Station I prepared after attending two of the Parking Task Force Committee public hearings. I have submitted that paper to every city council member. I am submitting this to you because I cannot attend your meeting. I have discussed this situation with literally hundreds of residents of this city. Almost every person I have discussed this subject with feels the same as I do but will not speak up to the city. I do notice that the Task Force recognizes there may be additional issues but does not address the primary issue in my paper nor what they recognize as probably the causation of the parking problem: LACK OF CONTROL OF RENTAL PROPERTY. I again ask the questions: 1. Who is going to exercise control over rental properties? 2. Why make ordinances if they are not going to be enforced? Ve , truly yours, Hugh Lindsay Attorn Encl sure HWLIv A PAPER CONCERNING PARKING IN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Problems I have had personally. I have seen or heard about these very same problems in other neighborhoods. 1. People coming out of rental property at all hours of the night (8 p.m. to 7 a.m.) to cars parked in the street. Horns going off. Doors slamming. Loud talking. Trash thrown in the street. GD this MF that. I do not need to hear that GD this and MF that at six o'clock on Sunday morning from a young lady barely dressed and coming out of rental property to her vehicle and going back to the rental property saying the same GD this and MF that as she went while I am trying to pick up the paper. 2. Cars parked on both sides of the street so I can just barely get my pickup through to go down the street. I seriously doubt if emergency vehicles could get down the street. 3. Cars parked in the daytime so the garbage people could not get to my garbage can that was in the street, not in my yard. Cars parked so the mail person had no access to the mail box. 4. Cars parked in bicycle lanes. The police do not enforce parking in the bicycle lane. I saw a bicycle rider injured when he ran into a parked car that he did not see in the dark. When I have called the police they have not issued a citation, instead they have knocked on doors until they found the driver of the car and had the owner move the car. The next week the same car. I have seen a vehicle parked in a bicycle lane for 48 hours without a citation. 5. There are students who live in Southwood Valley or points south who come and park around my house to bicycle or walk to school. They leave their bicycle at their boyfriends house across the street. Conclusions and questions: If they ignore the parking restrictions now what do you think making more restrictions will accomplish? When leaving the committee public meeting September 26, I went to visit my in laws who have a house on Goode Street where new city parking restrictions are in place for parking one side only for safety reasons. The street was entirely full on one side and the only place to park at my in laws was across the driveway, mostly blocked by students parking in front of the driveway. The only person I blocked was my brother in law. Hello. In my neighborhood, our deed restrictions do not allow overnight street parking for either guests or permanent residents. Of course it is not controllable. I suspect violations have gone on so long the restrictions may not be enforceable. Counselors have said that the homeowner association cannot enforce the restrictions because the dedicated city streets leave that control to the city. There are only 3 choices that I see. The students either are: dumb, do not care, or stupid. You cannot fix do not care or stupid. 2 out of 3 are not good odds. The only way you are going to resolve the parking problems is to do something about rental property. Too many students living in a house with too many vehicles are going to cause a problem every single time. You will not find, in my neighborhood, permanent residents or non student renters who cause these parking problems. Only the rental property for students are a source of the problem. The alternatives presented at the committee meeting with the public seemed to be one of the following. If we ignore the real problem of student housing control: 1. Widen the streets until the lack of control of student housing dictates more room when we will have to widen the streets again; or 2. Deny parking in the streets or narrow the streets and force the parking into front or back yards until they are used up then we do not know what to do. Both of these choices do not address the basic question: who is going to control the students? Some of the persons who spoke at the first committee hearing seemed to be saying the student money controls so we have to let them do whatever they want. It would be like running an asylum with the inmates in control. Is that what we want for this city? Addendum l: Subsequent to writing this another public meeting of the committee was scheduled for November 14, 2012. Plans have been developed with supposed positive and negative results to some of those plans. None of these plans address the problem of control over rental properties. I attended that meeting and there were was no attempt to address the problem. In talking to city staff I have been told: 1. Because of budget restraints there is no longer a parking patrol and the police will not ticket parking violations. I have observed that result. 2. There is no enforcement of present ordinances limiting the number of unrelated persons in a property. The owner of the property is merely told not to have too many tenants in a property the next year. Perhaps this is the reason why there are 6 to 8 motor vehicles regularly associated with many single - family residences. Why make the ordinances if they are not going to be enforced? Why is it that mowing grass can be enforced but parking and occupancy of single family residences cannot? In my humble opine health and safety issues are much more critical with parking and occupancy than with grass mowing. Hugh W. Lindsay Office: 412 Tarrow Home: 400 Walton Drive E Ae I­ Ann uAM z ii mom m�a I I ) I I I I �3 ¢ Of O EL EL O U N S 4 3� 7Nv 3. KAREN YVONNE DOWLING WILSON A -0 100 50 0 100 SCALE IN FEET COMMON AREA \ \ . \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - \• \ \ V -0 -` '\ \ \• \ •\ 471 AC. 'v \ \ OUC \ ass. \ \ \ \. ••\ \ \, :, \'� Hrc El­ L7A 1 L23 63 ROW A -0 MV OF WW - 70434' OBSERVATION. W x too' wW Aax — T I ' att _T I I I� iI I ' �p ! m' al�LwlE zre: j C. FERGUSON BURLESON COUNTY GAS GATHERING SYSTEM 2394/240 \ E ino/xIr \, ( J N/T za � PHASE 23 LOT stoat 1 ( 4279/217 BRYAN COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT INC. / REM. 324.83 ACRE TRACT \ 3. THIS TRACT DOES NOT UE WITHIN A DESIGNATED 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAN ACCORDING TO THE 1245 AC. — \ 1023191 WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD I 4561/039 5. 1/2' IRON RODS AT ALL LOT CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS, AS REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION A -0 PJ - BC - M ? THE CITIES OF COIlEGE STATION AND BRYAN. I BY THE PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION. 7. THE ENTIRE GREENWAY COMMON AREA WILL BE DESIGNATED AS A PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT BY THIS PUT. THE FUTURE TRAIL SYSTEM WITHIN THE GREENWAY COMMON AREA WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED B•.' THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION. B. THE GREENWAY COMMON AREA WILL BE IMINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION. PERMITTED USES WILL BE PER THE BIOCORRIDOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE Le S. STORMWATER DETENTION WILL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH LOT AS THEY DEVELOP OR ON ADJACENT A ` I ( I IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS PUBLIC WAYS, UNTIL THE PUBUC INFRASTRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTED BY THE APPLICANT AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY, OR A GUARANTEE OF PERFORMANCE IS PROVIDED BRYAN C MERGE Ik DEVELOPMENT INC. A v V AV A A A V I V Av .83 ACR TRACT REM. 324E 4023/91 I I V A v PHASE 23 v a v� v v �12 Lb w \ \ \ 93EENWAY zee /w A zest+ yf ME "r 100 50 0 100 SCALE IN FEET COMMON AREA \ \ . \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - \• \ \ V -0 -` '\ \ \• \ •\ 471 AC. 'v \ \ OUC \ ass. \ \ \ \. ••\ \ \, :, \'� Hrc El­ L7A 1 L23 63 ROW A -0 MV OF WW - 70434' OBSERVATION. W x too' wW Aax — T I ' att _T I I I� iI I ' �p ! m' al�LwlE zre: j C. FERGUSON BURLESON COUNTY GAS GATHERING SYSTEM 2394/240 I ! I E ino/xIr ' D. MODIFICATION 8775/258 AND PARTIAL RELEASE 8440/261 AFFECTING EASEMENT 2394/240 za � PHASE 23 LOT stoat 1 ( 4279/217 CROSS THIS PROPERTY I I 3. THIS TRACT DOES NOT UE WITHIN A DESIGNATED 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAN ACCORDING TO THE 1245 AC. — 4. CURVE LENGTHS SHOWN ALONG THE BOUNDARY OR RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES ARE CHORD LENGTHS. WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD I 4561/039 5. 1/2' IRON RODS AT ALL LOT CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS, AS REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION A -0 PJ - BC - M ? THE CITIES OF COIlEGE STATION AND BRYAN. I BY THE PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION. 7. THE ENTIRE GREENWAY COMMON AREA WILL BE DESIGNATED AS A PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT BY THIS PUT. THE FUTURE TRAIL SYSTEM WITHIN THE GREENWAY COMMON AREA WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED B•.' THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION. B. THE GREENWAY COMMON AREA WILL BE IMINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION. PERMITTED USES WILL BE PER THE BIOCORRIDOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE ARTICLE 9. SECTION 9.10.0 PERMITTED USES. S. STORMWATER DETENTION WILL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH LOT AS THEY DEVELOP OR ON ADJACENT PHASE 23 LOT BLOCK 1 ` I ( I IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS PUBLIC WAYS, UNTIL THE PUBUC INFRASTRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTED BY THE APPLICANT AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY, OR A GUARANTEE OF PERFORMANCE IS PROVIDED BRYAN C MERGE Ik DEVELOPMENT INC. 780 A0 �� PERFORMANCE, AND ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE SECTION OF THE BIOCORRIDOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE. I .83 ACR TRACT REM. 324E 4023/91 I I I m •` .� Ilse /+r a IM %1 p A LaUT, \`�•��`�. lV SAMTARY SE4FA EAEEYFNi. An Ln r p ra S­T­y EkMMM. ,tl an b 91rAx xd vs, ,0' att a BRV•W AAREN sin r.Rr EASEKExr •xacxr s nrARr EASEaExr o' wE �(eY sLpARArE NsmuKENn l _ — Nrness NO Pa (er -MA. T) I (; ror sEP - — 3 p�� a — Pa— —,G vnwc AAU[ r :+ \� a wW — u aE �n I II Ia r+4iMr SriV1A k JIMMIE WELCH �A'FNFNT _ (eY MPMArt 'Tnwwr) 1 b' n REV LIVING TRUST !-► —. 11 27]/203 C9 L37 s+' 7x S4H OB' 12'E - 704.54' srs ao a' wE 3 �o m 289/035 PIOMEDICAL IMY I II g (ev ATE MsmuuwT) A -0 41 n < E C' CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF BRAZOS ) I De __ of Bryan o _ ommerce and pment owner of the tracts shown n lhia plat. being the tract of land as conveyed m the Dastl Rscorda of Brazos County n Volume 4023 pogo 91, and designated here:,, as a portion of The Tradition Subdv'son. Phase 23, to the City of College Station, Texas. and whoa; name is subacnbed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of the Public forover all atreete, alleys, park, greenwoys, nfrostracture, eosemenla, and public place' thereon shown for the purpose and consideration th exproeeed. All h dedication, shall be n fee ample unless expressy o—i o b ryan Commerce and Development. Inc Y CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I,_______ Chairman of the g antl Zon Commio issn of the City of College Station, herebPlanniny certify U ing at the at plot was duly roved by the Commission on the __ day app of 20__ Choir CERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEER I o _ City Engineer f the City of College Stol'an, Texas. hereby cert'ly that this SubdiM.— Plat confarma to the regur —ris of the Subd'v'son Regulaton, of the City of College Stators STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF BRAZOS ) Betare me. the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name is a,b,cribed to the fore gong instrument. and acknowledged to me that he executed the soma for the purpose and consideration therein stated. Given antler my hand and seal on IN- day of _, 20 — Notary Public, Brazos County, Texas CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF BRAZOS ) _ fy thCounty Clerk, and far said tom m hereby certi this plat together with its certificates of 0uthen6-ti- was filed for record in my office the___ —_____ day of _ __ 20___, in the Used Recama of 8raxos County. Texas. in Volume __ Page WITNESS my hand and official Seal, at my, office in Bryan, Texan. County Clerk Brazos County. Texas WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD L7A 1 L23 63 ROW A -0 MV OF WW - 70434' OBSERVATION. W x too' wW Aax — T 2. THE FOLLOWING BLANKET EASEMENTS DO APPLY TO THIS TRACT: ' att _T I I I� iI I ' N/F BRYAN COMMERCE k DEVELOPMENT INC. REM. 324.63 ACRE TRACT 4021/91 T[�sxuEUr aAxtt — 11{ C. FERGUSON BURLESON COUNTY GAS GATHERING SYSTEM 2394/240 I E ino/xIr ' D. MODIFICATION 8775/258 AND PARTIAL RELEASE 8440/261 AFFECTING EASEMENT 2394/240 DRILL Sa EASEMENT DO NOT AFFECT THIS TRACT. ... .........._ 4279/217 CROSS THIS PROPERTY CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF BRAZOS ) I De __ of Bryan o _ ommerce and pment owner of the tracts shown n lhia plat. being the tract of land as conveyed m the Dastl Rscorda of Brazos County n Volume 4023 pogo 91, and designated here:,, as a portion of The Tradition Subdv'son. Phase 23, to the City of College Station, Texas. and whoa; name is subacnbed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of the Public forover all atreete, alleys, park, greenwoys, nfrostracture, eosemenla, and public place' thereon shown for the purpose and consideration th exproeeed. All h dedication, shall be n fee ample unless expressy o—i o b ryan Commerce and Development. Inc Y CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I,_______ Chairman of the g antl Zon Commio issn of the City of College Station, herebPlanniny certify U ing at the at plot was duly roved by the Commission on the __ day app of 20__ Choir CERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEER I o _ City Engineer f the City of College Stol'an, Texas. hereby cert'ly that this SubdiM.— Plat confarma to the regur —ris of the Subd'v'son Regulaton, of the City of College Stators STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF BRAZOS ) Betare me. the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name is a,b,cribed to the fore gong instrument. and acknowledged to me that he executed the soma for the purpose and consideration therein stated. Given antler my hand and seal on IN- day of _, 20 — Notary Public, Brazos County, Texas CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF BRAZOS ) _ fy thCounty Clerk, and far said tom m hereby certi this plat together with its certificates of 0uthen6-ti- was filed for record in my office the___ —_____ day of _ __ 20___, in the Used Recama of 8raxos County. Texas. in Volume __ Page WITNESS my hand and official Seal, at my, office in Bryan, Texan. County Clerk Brazos County. Texas WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD NOTES: 4561/039 A -0 1. BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION. W x too' wW Aax — T 2. THE FOLLOWING BLANKET EASEMENTS DO APPLY TO THIS TRACT: x � e P AsIR1AENT) A. BRUSHY WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION 556/205 B. FERGUSON BURLESON COUNTY GAS GATHERING SYSTEM 2204/162 T[�sxuEUr aAxtt C. FERGUSON BURLESON COUNTY GAS GATHERING SYSTEM 2394/240 (SEE PIPELINE EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON FOR LOCATION) D. MODIFICATION 8775/258 AND PARTIAL RELEASE 8440/261 AFFECTING EASEMENT 2394/240 DO NOT AFFECT THIS TRACT. E. ACCESS EASEMENTS AND DRILL SITES DEFINED IN 4279/217 AND 6494/188 DO NOT CROSS THIS PROPERTY 3. THIS TRACT DOES NOT UE WITHIN A DESIGNATED 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAN ACCORDING TO THE F.I.R.M. MAPS, COMMUNITY PANEL NOS. 4804100285 -E, EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 16, 2012 4. CURVE LENGTHS SHOWN ALONG THE BOUNDARY OR RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES ARE CHORD LENGTHS. WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD 4561/039 5. 1/2' IRON RODS AT ALL LOT CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS, AS REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION A -0 REGULATIONS OF THE BIOCORRIDOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE ADOPTED BY THE CITIES OF COIlEGE STATION AND BRYAN. 6. THE OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIMUTIES FOR THE GREENWAY COMMON AREA WILL BE BY THE PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION. 7. THE ENTIRE GREENWAY COMMON AREA WILL BE DESIGNATED AS A PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT BY THIS PUT. THE FUTURE TRAIL SYSTEM WITHIN THE GREENWAY COMMON AREA WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED B•.' THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION. B. THE GREENWAY COMMON AREA WILL BE IMINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION. PERMITTED USES WILL BE PER THE BIOCORRIDOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE ARTICLE 9. SECTION 9.10.0 PERMITTED USES. S. STORMWATER DETENTION WILL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH LOT AS THEY DEVELOP OR ON ADJACENT TRACTS AS REGIONAL STORMATEER DETENTION FACILITIES. 10. THERE WILL BE NO PERMIT FOR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS, EXCEPTING QUASI -PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS PUBLIC WAYS, UNTIL THE PUBUC INFRASTRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTED BY THE APPLICANT AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY, OR A GUARANTEE OF PERFORMANCE IS PROVIDED TO THE CITY'S CITY ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, GUARANTEE OF PERFORMANCE, AND ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE SECTION OF THE BIOCORRIDOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE. 1015 h ROW LINE TABLE uxE TAiIIE —0 +LIOM PlmcrlW G. efes Nr,• oe' to w - wA NIT w.w Nm' a' .law Lxe ,+ar7 H0+' b' x ;•r w.sr Na' w' w•w Lm ,xizr NN• rs' err ut r,.ar aM'rr .1 Lrx u7+r Ins• «• low UJ ,Yr,' Nb' +a Y•w W IU.od Nal' N' n^N La +ed.rr N,e• sr IT•r In.a• s+r v' set Mrs' SM 0e' ,2t PLAT BOUNDARY CURVE TABLE cw To. R+E / LEwmx RxUS oELTA iMaOrt calm OMECn ao' salsa —AA' a.se• 'ao'n tr.a+• +e0.%• _AA 0.rr II.N' N +rW'r v c x.a• var aerxl•z• x +.xv x.ea' ser4l'arw U 2+.)1' eex.alr Om'xi'xi• ,x.M' x.T1' R 'alt as w.IO' eexs.• app m.oe' w.o'' IHa •mt I OTS k ROW CURVE TABU a— r 1 -0 1 - 1 - 1 CELTA TNaEllr saw — aRE— cr ra.xr' x5.00' 0'0'00'00• ]rAD' rare' SOTOe',xt a n.ar sr aaiae'M see ts.,N' s.rdrxit c„ ­W.. is, rsot City Engineer City of College Station CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR AND /OR ENGINEER STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF BRAZOS ) I, Brad Kerr, Registered Public Surveyor, No 4502, n the State of Texas, hereby certdy that this plat is true and rat and ... prepared from on actual survey or the property and that properly markers and monuments we placetl under my aupervislon on the ground. n u Brad Karr, R.P.LS. No. 4502 LEGEND PUT BOUNDARY — • — • — ROW LINE LOT LINE (� PROPERTY CORNER -- - - - -. EXISTING EASEMENTS PUBLIC EASEMENT PROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT VICINITY MAP 3.3� J � BRYAN COMMERCE e \ \ (3 DEVELOPMENT INC \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ L5 L B \\ \\ IN IN . \`� \\ VA�VA' ,V VAA \'.� `� � N \ \_ \ \ I\ \ PHASE 23 \ ., \ \ \\ \, \, \ f�EErJWAY \\ \ \ \ \\ '� .V A V N' V A; A SO' EVESIMCD IX I \ N \ A 3 3 Y O a U N LIT I %r / J / COMMERCE I BRYAN / J REM. 32 ` 4 RE TRACT E', f I _ E $ it "nE?I 023 AC !i I \N ��� r .A V` N N VA N 12 WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD 4561/039 A -0 1 °�Y "AgONr G —Ai uE M .°MY ° :r I a t� IEY EF ➢MATE x45ANIFNn 1 ( Y SEPARATE R2s,RxYENn I ^ I N (4—E, 1xE,RUL1Lx1) ,cL --. ro._ 1 _ Pc._ 44 E. 1 PvE E I' i SA EASE�IT BIOMEDI — IEY CAL My ATE —.1) ROW - .1B' PN4T sE).ro' u.t E' Iti.X' I WE 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD 121 • ~ L23 Ct N48' 08' 121V - 704.54' 4561/039 �lE I' 4.1E T A -O EASEMENT DETAIL VICINITY MAP a ws PROJECT � uw LOCATION EASEMENTS LINE TABLE LOTS N ROW UNE TABLE USE ONE ML 1 1Ex01x rABlE — 1 E LExO — w EPEE ED , . — LM .1 . ... Sr ]01Y Lb S' IV O1E LM Mn I2' W' J3•w xb• N' H'E ' w.RV NM IF— LEE w.X' x ME LX 130.1 N7 X' 4rw LEI n.X' )M' 3T w•w L. n.Ir HERE b• I— LX Iwn• xX' w srw LN I III Ixx HS, E4 b•w' LX I DROW x,s• sY 171 I. In 11 Sb' %• TaT M10' S4r ro' 122 AT BOUNDARY CURVE TABLE H+E I LExcrN RADRrs 1ELrA TAxaxr DESSM Exam 1RCC110x w' sJl.so' aozcew E. »' .w• m' )Ow C3 I7.IN' 422.X' 000'OE'N' E., Il.s.• x.rw'sow cJ X.X' uas• —21 x4.)2• x -Er Xr.rs)w t4 24.n• EIRL.. 001'X']1 12X' 24.11' x4S41'0JE w.10' EE).s.' OOtX'w• X.sE' — 11 I OTS 4 ROW CURVE TABLE CWVR reEx a1a34 1 1rnPlx RAn1us oELU rWlmur cx1RP cx11m Rracnlx ci Mrr xs.as• oE0'aa a.m' Xx• sEYae•ut ro I —I rb• I rn' s4ro)•Xt 4Ee.so• nn-- 1 a7r rw•IREE E DLLLGE )TAT11,�::�� �,wnT,. TE.Y4) MERC[A1D n[ n ..' 11111111D I II OLUNCa031 OF LAND 5MO DEEMOem tED 3F BxA2 cxAS. TDExVAE M P T OD IMVE IED 171 T AS DE DECD RE— EM, A11 rF 3..3 CRE III N� I' ll 4 ArxE TR CT11.1 HI CF OF 1171 ern TxE 100 50 0 100 - TRIL S. , v SCALE IN FEET LHENCID FEET TO A � INSH RON ROD SET H)R REFIR k 1111111101 HPID FIlID Ill TIE lHRT.­T 1 I AIRI TRACT IS DESCIEWED 81 A ITED n s, v.w Frx nrvcEDFER FEErTO.,w1 Lx1 3x acw �. rlracALLS. LxAoEnws.ca 4 H. roax0lsrA toF ..1E EFLr. Ao. r U� Cn ROD nx FORT Aim Er THEICIE nLF- AHIROT-OSFFionn .-TROHRODIETDV rxF THROUGH SAID RFMAMDFA OF 124 $1 AIRE HEAVY AND ALONG THE PROPOSED fOVrxWEST LINE OF H—EDICA, WAY FOR THE TIONYTHIMED 08 4+ FOa Al ARC DSTANFF DF 9.00 1 1-03-111FE-AIIIEHO OF HS E— ALONG SAID CUx)T THRSHOD A CFNTEAL ANGLE OF OP OE w FOR Al ARC BSTANCE HE Ii 54 ..T HTED 1D RFAR3 N 4r 0. 50 W 1TH FE'.ETT TO A n RICH N 1� ��- W FOR A DISFIECI OF 1111 FEET 1) A K I EAD IRISH HOUT III IIASIED THE OF I IIIIIIERI CITHIE HAI INS; I 11DIFS OF IA...E FEET IITHEDxFAPS;s FEE mAKmCx HEIR1`:AVrvcn���E:"�ME� H P a1WAY�R DWRwmLLA ' o�F) ;Be x,EA D N E «1H ER� aWL1E s.N4x 41 OF 1111 )H. FOR REF—W FA wrH 11011011OOHP RE.,RE.) 55u 53 F. FOE A nrsTANCF. OF O 31 FEET. m E.z4nFEET3 r1 n1E EnD 111 11411 1A ALO E 1cE . 4 FExT F r. Dcu - 'THROTODA ILNTxu, AHOO, O R2 3 4w III AN Ax, STAN L OF TO IQ FEET ICINM1 HEAxs 1 1 I EFET33 n Ell Or OR THENCE. TEH HSAIDREMnMOFROF124.83A TR.Ci'FORnEFOLLOw lG LS. 124- IT 01• E FOR A O15FANCE OF 135"FEET. LEGEND PLAT BOUNDARY — • — • — ROW UNE LOT USE O PROPERTY CORNER ...... ... ..... ........ ........ ... EXISTING EASEMENTS ...... . ......... ......... _.... ....._ PUBLIC EASEMENT PROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT FILE PUBLIC UTIUTY EASEMENT 're L49 - PIPELINE i EAREEI wT f N!n) )snn PHA 223 f LOT 2, BLOCK 1 1245 AC. PD - BC - M E', f I _ E $ it "nE?I 120' S 1' 1 41V I 553.28' - PIPELINE i L48 - PIPELINE 1 m nPHixE S22 10 38'E �1 975.76' - PIPELINE SE 23 = f 1 1 LOT�L 1 S�ze��, szr 10 38 ..� 70811' - PIPELINE 7.60 AC. PD - BC - M I �'S?'z,,, w• EEEE.ASe"xEEI1M>; n I I S -.;. ° "�. i .. L47 PIPELINE �E PUEUC UR3tt i I�6e:M..,� r I ..•� V 20 ' n , PEAK ENT nE4 r z� L46 - PIPELINE � EASEMENT DETAIL VICINITY MAP a ws PROJECT � uw LOCATION EASEMENTS LINE TABLE LOTS N ROW UNE TABLE USE ONE ML 1 1Ex01x rABlE — 1 E LExO — w EPEE ED , . — LM .1 . ... Sr ]01Y Lb S' IV O1E LM Mn I2' W' J3•w xb• N' H'E ' w.RV NM IF— LEE w.X' x ME LX 130.1 N7 X' 4rw LEI n.X' )M' 3T w•w L. n.Ir HERE b• I— LX Iwn• xX' w srw LN I III Ixx HS, E4 b•w' LX I DROW x,s• sY 171 I. In 11 Sb' %• TaT M10' S4r ro' 122 AT BOUNDARY CURVE TABLE H+E I LExcrN RADRrs 1ELrA TAxaxr DESSM Exam 1RCC110x w' sJl.so' aozcew E. »' .w• m' )Ow C3 I7.IN' 422.X' 000'OE'N' E., Il.s.• x.rw'sow cJ X.X' uas• —21 x4.)2• x -Er Xr.rs)w t4 24.n• EIRL.. 001'X']1 12X' 24.11' x4S41'0JE w.10' EE).s.' OOtX'w• X.sE' — 11 I OTS 4 ROW CURVE TABLE CWVR reEx a1a34 1 1rnPlx RAn1us oELU rWlmur cx1RP cx11m Rracnlx ci Mrr xs.as• oE0'aa a.m' Xx• sEYae•ut ro I —I rb• I rn' s4ro)•Xt 4Ee.so• nn-- 1 a7r rw•IREE E DLLLGE )TAT11,�::�� �,wnT,. TE.Y4) MERC[A1D n[ n ..' 11111111D I II OLUNCa031 OF LAND 5MO DEEMOem tED 3F BxA2 cxAS. TDExVAE M P T OD IMVE IED 171 T AS DE DECD RE— EM, A11 rF 3..3 CRE III N� I' ll 4 ArxE TR CT11.1 HI CF OF 1171 ern TxE 100 50 0 100 - TRIL S. , v SCALE IN FEET LHENCID FEET TO A � INSH RON ROD SET H)R REFIR k 1111111101 HPID FIlID Ill TIE lHRT.­T 1 I AIRI TRACT IS DESCIEWED 81 A ITED n s, v.w Frx nrvcEDFER FEErTO.,w1 Lx1 3x acw �. rlracALLS. LxAoEnws.ca 4 H. roax0lsrA toF ..1E EFLr. Ao. r U� Cn ROD nx FORT Aim Er THEICIE nLF- AHIROT-OSFFionn .-TROHRODIETDV rxF THROUGH SAID RFMAMDFA OF 124 $1 AIRE HEAVY AND ALONG THE PROPOSED fOVrxWEST LINE OF H—EDICA, WAY FOR THE TIONYTHIMED 08 4+ FOa Al ARC DSTANFF DF 9.00 1 1-03-111FE-AIIIEHO OF HS E— ALONG SAID CUx)T THRSHOD A CFNTEAL ANGLE OF OP OE w FOR Al ARC BSTANCE HE Ii 54 ..T HTED 1D RFAR3 N 4r 0. 50 W 1TH FE'.ETT TO A n RICH N 1� ��- W FOR A DISFIECI OF 1111 FEET 1) A K I EAD IRISH HOUT III IIASIED THE OF I IIIIIIERI CITHIE HAI INS; I 11DIFS OF IA...E FEET IITHEDxFAPS;s FEE mAKmCx HEIR1`:AVrvcn���E:"�ME� H P a1WAY�R DWRwmLLA ' o�F) ;Be x,EA D N E «1H ER� aWL1E s.N4x 41 OF 1111 )H. FOR REF—W FA wrH 11011011OOHP RE.,RE.) 55u 53 F. FOE A nrsTANCF. OF O 31 FEET. m E.z4nFEET3 r1 n1E EnD 111 11411 1A ALO E 1cE . 4 FExT F r. Dcu - 'THROTODA ILNTxu, AHOO, O R2 3 4w III AN Ax, STAN L OF TO IQ FEET ICINM1 HEAxs 1 1 I EFET33 n Ell Or OR THENCE. TEH HSAIDREMnMOFROF124.83A TR.Ci'FORnEFOLLOw lG LS. 124- IT 01• E FOR A O15FANCE OF 135"FEET. LEGEND PLAT BOUNDARY — • — • — ROW UNE LOT USE O PROPERTY CORNER ...... ... ..... ........ ........ ... EXISTING EASEMENTS ...... . ......... ......... _.... ....._ PUBLIC EASEMENT PROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT FILE PUBLIC UTIUTY EASEMENT