HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/21/2010 - Minutes - Planning & Zoning CommissionHome of 1ixmf Ac-Al prover: itv'
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Workshop Meeting
January 21, 2010, 6:00 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Nichols, Scott Shafer, Tom Woodfin, Paul
Greer, Doug Slack, Mike Ashfield, and Hugh Stearns
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Larry Stewart
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Senior Planners Jennifer Prochazka and Jason Schubert, Staff
Planner Matt Robinson, Senior Assistant City Engineer Carol Cotter, Transportation Planning
Coordinator Joe Guerra, Greenways Program Manager Venessa Garza, Assistant Director Lance
Simms, Director Bob Cowell, First Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson, Action Center
Representative Kerry Mullins, and Administrative Support Specialist Brittany Caldwell
Call the meeting to order.
Chairman John Nichols called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
There was general discussion regarding Regular Agenda Items 5, 7, and 8.
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update to the Commission on
the status of items within the 2010 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached). (JS)
Senior Planner Jason Schubert gave an update regarding the 2010 P&Z Plan of Work.
4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the Metropolitan Planning
Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan Update 2010 - 2035. (JG)
Transportation Planning Coordinator Joe Guerra gave a presentation regarding the
Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Plan Update.
Chairman John Nichols recessed the Workshop meeting at 7:00 p.m.
Chairman John Nichols reconvened the meeting at 10:07 p.m.
January 21, 2010 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding Capital Improvement Program
projects. (BC)
Director Bob Cowell gave a presentation regarding Capital Improvement Program
projects.
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the Penberthy Road Extension
capital project. (BC)
Director Bob Cowell gave an update regarding the Penberthy Road Extension capital
project.
7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming
Meetings:
• February 4, 2010 - P&Z Meeting - Council Chambers - Workshop 6:00 pm and
Regular 7:00 pm
• February 25, 2010 - City Council Meeting - Council Chambers - 7:00 pm
Director Bob Cowell reviewed the upcoming meeting dates for the Planning & Zoning
Commission.
8. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review
Board, Council Transportation Committee, Joint Parks/Planning and Zoning
Subcommittee, Wolf Pen Creek Oversight Committee, Platting Requirements and
Standards Subcommittee, Neighborhood Plan Stakeholder Resource Team, Code
Coordination Subcommittee, P&Z Subcommittee for Data Collection.
Commissioner Shafer gave an update regarding the Wolf Pen Creek Oversight
Committee.
9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion.
10. Adjourn.
Commissioner Shafer motioned to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Woodfin
seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0).
Meeting adjourned at 10:47 p.m.
January 21, 2010 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
Appro
J chols, Chairman
Pning and Zoning Commission
Attest:
&I w ~ I &xi
Brittan C I ell, dmin. Support Specialist
Planning and Development Services
January 21, 2010 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
(*400r"
CITY OF COL1.1.c;&I Sl"v-ru )N MINUTES
Home of'7i;V'ar,c4f G!rrlversi"
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
January 21, 2010, 7:00 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Nichols, Scott Shafer, Tom Woodfin, Paul
Greer, Doug Slack, Mike Ashfield, and Hugh Stearns
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Larry Stewart
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Senior Planner Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner Lauren Hovde,
Planning Technician Beth Boerboom, Senior Assistant City Engineer Carol Cotter,
Transportation Planning Coordinator Joe Guerra, Greenways Program Manager Venessa Garza,
Planning Administrator Molly Hitchcock, Assistant Director Lance Simms, Director Bob
Cowell, First Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson, Action Center Representative Kerry
Mullins, and Administrative Support Specialist Brittany Caldwell
1. Call meeting to order.
Chairman Nichols called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
2. Hear Citizens.
None
3. Consent Agenda
3.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting Minutes.
• January 7, 2010 - Workshop
• January 7, 2010 - Regular
Commissioner Greer motioned to approve Consent Agenda Item 3.1. Commissioner
Ashfield seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0).
Regular Agenda
4. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
January 21, 2010 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4
No items were removed from the Consent Agenda.
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a variance request to Section 8.2.C.3 of
the Unified Development Ordinance regarding minimum lot width for platting in the
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and presentation, possible action, and discussion on a
Preliminary Plat for the Gardens II Subdivision consisting of two lots on 2.99 acres,
located at 14711 FM 2154 in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case #09-00500246 (MR)
Staff Planner Matt Robinson presented the variance request to the lot width and
recommended approval. He said that if the requested variance is granted, then staff
recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the condition that right-of-way
dedication of nine feet is provided.
There was general discussion regarding the variances.
Joe Schultz, Harle Engineering Co., stated that he was available for questions.
Commissioner Slack motioned to approve the variance to the lot width.
Commissioner Ashfield seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0).
Commissioner Woodfin motioned to approve the Preliminary Plat with the
condition that right-of-way dedication of nine feet is provided. Commissioner Greer
seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0).
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a revised Master Plan for the Peach
Creek Development, including two phases on 2,273.93 acres located south of the Indian
Lakes Subdivision along Peach Creek in the southern portion of the City's Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction (ETJ) and extending from State Highway 6 to FM 2154. Case #09-00500251
(JP)
Senior Planner Jennifer Prochazka presented the Master Plan and recommended
approval.
There was general discussion regarding the Master Plan.
Jack McFarlane, Peach Creek Partners, stated that this was a preliminary plan and the
new plan would show much more open space.
Commissioner Greer motioned to approve the Master Plan. Commissioner
Woodfin seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0-1). Commissioner Stearns
abstained from the vote.
7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat of Lots 2R, 3-
1 through 3-49, 6 & 7, Block 3 Crescent Pointe Phase 4, including a replat of Lots 2 & 3,
Block 3 Crescent Point Phase 4, 52 lots on 21.64 acres located at 2501 and 2520 Crescent
Pointe Parkway. Case #08-00500221 (JP)
January 21, 2010 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of4
Senior Planner Jennifer Prochazka presented the Replat and recommended approval if the
Commission agreed with the discretionary items related to right-angle lots, block length,
and public access ways.
There was general discussion regarding the discretionary items.
Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing.
Fred Payne, Kling Engineering, stated that the plat was brought forward to meet setback
requirements and that the site layout had not changed from the previous one that was
approved.
There was further discussion regarding the discretionary items.
Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Ashfield motioned to approve the Replat with the condition that the
rear fence on Lot 3-44 does not extend beyond the point where the public access
easement meets the property line and that pedestrian access be allowed to and from
the access way to Common Area 2. Commissioner Shafer seconded the motion,
motion passed (6-0-1). Chairman Nichols abstained from the vote.
8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment of
the City of College Station Comprehensive Plan to include the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan as an element. Case #08-00500285 (VG)
Greenways Program Manager Venessa Garza presented the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan.
There was general discussion regarding the Master Plan.
Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing.
Ann Gundy, 1720 Starling Drive, College Station, Texas; Brian Leschler 1716 Starling
Drive, College Station, Texas; Richard Simon, 3946 Parrot Cove, College Station, Texas;
Gary Drost, 1721 Cardinal Loop, College Station, Texas; Rose Norwood, 1737 Purple
Martin Cove, College Station, Texas; Steve O'Neal, 3917 Hawk Owl Cove, College
Station, Texas; Mike Gerst, 3923 Hawk Owl Cove, College Station, Texas. The citizens
were concerned about the multi-use path that is proposed to go along Lick Creek on
property owned by the Springbrook Homeowners Association. They were concerned
about flooding, safety, and lowered property values.
Gary Ives, 3943 Blue Jay Court, College Station, Texas; Noel Bauman, 1734 Purple
Martin Cove, College Station, Texas; Derek Bangs, 1728 Purple Martin Cove, College
Station, Texas. The citizens were in favor of the project, but were concerned that the
ballot results from the Springbrook Homeowners Association regarding the Lick Creek
multi-use path did not represent the opinion of the majority of the membership.
January 21, 2010 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4
Dale Picha, City of Bryan, Director of Traffic and Transportation, spoke in favor of the
Master Plan.
Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing.
There was general discussion regarding the Master Plan.
Commissioner Stearns motioned to recommend approval of the adoption of the
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. Commissioner Shafer seconded
the motion, motion passed (7-0).
9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion.
10. Adjourn.
Commissioner Shafer motioned to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Woodfin
seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0).
The meeting was adjourned at 10:06 p.m.
Ap ov
o Nichols, Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
Attest:
&I &U Od"I
Brittan Cad ell, A min. Support Specialist
Planning and Development Services
January 21, 2010 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4
My name is Gary Ives, 3943 Blue Jay Court. Thank you for this time to speak.
On Tuesday, January 12, an emergency meeting of the Springbrook Homeowners Association Board was held,
followed by a ballot concerning the proposed Lick Creek trail.
I attended the meeting, and came away with a number of concerns:
1. The Board has developed a fully articulated position opposing this project without appropriate
consultation with the full membership.
2. The Board has inappropriately represented to various bodies and officials of the City that its
membership is against this project.
3. The Vice President of the Board ran the meeting, and inappropriately took the role of rebutting
member's statements in support of the project as each was presented.
4. The issue was repeatedly framed by the Board as one of "government interference," both in the
information packet and by the Vice President during the meeting.
5. The Board attempted to specifically discredit Noel Bauman. During the meeting, the Vice President
stated in part that, because of his former membership on the Planning and Zoning Commission, he
might be expected "to have an agenda."
6. The City was purposely not invited to the meeting for Q&A.
7. The ballot called by the Board was executed on an emergency basis, and without prior participation by
a majority of the membership.
8. A member attempted to place a motion that the ballot be deferred until more information could be
obtained, but the Vice President disallowed the motion.
I presented most of these concerns during public comments time at the City Council meeting last week. I
stated the hope that my concerns would be self-correcting as the Board considers the feedback and pushback
of the membership. However, based on events since the Tuesday meeting, I am discouraged.
I'm discouraged by the fact that the ballot results were to have been counted and posted on the Association's
website, originally by last Friday, then by last Monday. They were not posted until this afternoon, with 71
ballots returned, representing only 36.2% of the membership.
I am also very discouraged by an email sent out last Sunday by the Vice President to selected members who,
she said, had previously expressed opposition to the project. By this email, she was organizin'g' the public
statements of those members at this Commission's meeting tonight, and to City Council next week. More
troubling to me, she was also improperly soliciting additional negative votes for presentation by the Board
President at tonight's meeting.
Given the recent history of this matter, I have no confidence that the results of this ballot represent the fully
informed opinion of the majority of our membership.
From:
Ann & Jerry Gundy
1720 Starling Drive
College Station, TX 77845-4746
979.690.7452
To: Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission
Re: Plan to route the proposed hike/bike trail through private property owned by
the Springbrook Homeowners Association.
As property owners adjacent to the common greenbelt, we are opposed to the plan of
routing a public bike/hike trail through this area.
1. Safety and Security Issues
a. The area is not a visible greenway. Only a small portion of the trail can be
seen from Longmire and the Hwy 6 bypass.
b. The trail is closest to the rear of homes, property. No surveillance.
Opportunity for vandalism, theft, etc. from individuals coming off the
trail.
c. In the current jurisdiction, the homeowners association has management
responsibilities. Users of the area are primarily homeowners and or
family/friends of homeowners. There is some degree of accountability
here. If the property is public, it would be accessible to all population
groups -even undesirable populations.
d. Studies of social populations indicate that personal predators have a
tendency to "hang out" in public parks, on trails, etc. - putting families
and especially children at risk.
e. An increase in crime in the area would de-value the properties as fast or
faster than other property value factors being addressed.
f. Lick Creek already has a negative stigma attached to it. Hopefully with
the increased population and development in the park area, nature
center, etc. an incident like that one will not happen again.
g. Personal predators have brain damage - but they are wise and cunning
enough to be aware of patrol schedules.
h. Travel safety-the trail crosses Longmire in the middle of a block.
Motorist will not be watching for bikers/hikers there like they would at
an intersection. I have thrown on my brakes on a number of occasions
when children not watching traffic, crossed Eagle in the middle of the
block going to the bike path on the west side of Creekview Elementary.
i. Traffic on Longmire is increasing, I have waited as long as 10 minutes at
certain times of the day to make a left turn from Starling. Completion of
the overpass at Barron will help here.
j. It is better to be pro-active in planning than to try to correct a mistake
after lives have been affected; property has been damaged
2. Our personal investment:
This is our dream home.
I bought this property in February 1996. My realtor, Juanita Courier, assured me that
the common ground was owned by the Neighborhood Association, was deeded to
remain in a natural state and never be developed. That was the selling point. I had
looked at property all over B/CS -this one was perfect. The floor plan had everything
that I needed to accommodate all the furniture that I had accumulated and there was a
huge oak tree in the front yard (which died year 2 - but has been replaced). I was
looking for some degree of privacy and my son was adamant that I choose housing in a
neighborhood with people around me as opposed to being in the country by myself. I
was ready to go to the country - but he would not hear of it. 1 was a single widow at the
time and he is very protective - even now.
Jerry and I have put a lot of work into this house. We are less than 6 years of paying
out. We have too much invested both in development and in sweat equity to relocate
without loosing a lot. With the current housing market, I don't think we could get back
a portion of our investment; much less find similar property where we want to be that
would meet our needs and that we could be happy with. I am getting too old and tired
to tackle relocation. Our roots are too deep - we have too much invested. And the
thought of losing the dream of what we bought and developed is very disappointing.
3. Our contribution to the SHOA:
I promised myself that I would not try to take on an officer's responsibility until I
retired from TAMU and could devote the required time and energy, but we have
tried our best to be responsible and supportive homeowners.
We, as well as many other homeowners, have tried to be good stewards of the
common ground.
• We spray and kill poison ivy on a regular basis.
• We pick up trash on a regular basis. With the development upstream, the
trash has increased: beer cans, beer bottles, paper, Styrofoam cups, coolers,
etc. The drift line when the creek floods is getting closer to the back
property line.
• The property slopes from our back property line to the creek - everything
drains toward the creek. There are some pretty deep washes in places. We
have planted iris, canna, ginger, day lilies, cane in some of these eroding
areas. Purpose: the roots of the plants hold the soil in place - keeps it from
eroding and absorbs some of the water heading for the creek. This is
zeroscaping - natural plants that require little or no maintenance and can
survive in almost any environment drought or wet. The plants do their job -
go dormant in winter. Sometimes we clip off the dead tops; sometimes they
compost down, come back fresh from the roots in the spring.
• Concern: if the city installs this path, if not done correctly, could create a dam
where water will not flow from the properties into the creek as it should.
2
gone, the lighting will be more intense. It is always a shock when the trees
go dormant and how close our neighbor's lights are now - and we have
more distance than most between our lots.
Our grandsons love the path -they always want to go walk it when they
come. They think the Highway 6 Bridge is so cool. We show that off to all
our company - especially those that enjoy nature and history like we do.
Why do we do this?
o We enjoy growing things
o We have the interest and the expertise -Jerry is a retired landscaper;
owned two garden centers in his former life.
o We consider it our moral and ethic responsibility to take care of God's
green earth, protect the environment and contribute to making the
area around us a better place and still preserve the natural ambiance
of the greenway.
• Will the city replace vegetation? Perhaps, but I can also show you examples
where the city has planted but did not follow through with care and
maintenance and all the plants died making the environment worse, an
unsightly area, and a waste of money. Look at the drainage area going
under Longmire just south of Graham Road.
• The thought of loosing that amenity (greenway that is private to the
homeowners) is very disappointing. This is what we were told at the
beginning - now they are trying to say it has to be public.
The city and the developers have done a marvelous time developing the area up creek -
there are multiuse paths, parks, mini-parks, retention ponds, detention ponds. The time
to do this type of construction is at the early development stage before properties are
purchased.
Do multi-use public trails increase/decrease property values?
That is specific to the wants/needs/values of each individual homeowner. Some will see
it as an asset, others will see it as an invasion of privacy. At pre-purchase, homeowners
have a choice.
Are you going to be able to get 196 existing homeowners to agree? No.
It is very difficult to retro-fit a plan on top of an existing neighborhood.
A1121.1--t-
Ann Gundy
4
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
.GUEST REGISTER
MEETING DATE t, n a 1 _3'U 1 O
NAME
ADDRESS
2.
3.
4.
5.
9. ~ . C z MC.
10.
11. ~f~F-
12. ke ~c~ fT
2y 5-4-
a
CA'
l1 ,6 %1{11%` " j 7 39 (7 /aaw (W / Cove CS Y/ 7 )8yj
AAA, WaO
Ste-
2 3 44
l" l~ ti 1
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
6.
r. / l
"POW
x
tion Fo ss the C°'z'mission)
R,gtra
e$h to addre
For persons wl`O `Nis , ~ . X10
Date ofMeeting
lternNo.
Agenda
1
Name , l ? -
Address
or an orgar~zanon,
If speakinY, f tion
aniza
Name of org i
AL.''Er,c
to speak:
wishes
on which person
1 capacity:
Speak s official
er
t
4
4
- 1
t
f
G
Subject T
e
s as you ar
(J lum as soon stration
to r and
o step the o d leted
comp r ame
ember t handy state y°u ou have
se rern chair1 d n If y EASE
Plea an
ized by the officer resentai° PL
rec° o th presldln~ing Y°ur pheComm1SGF11,ES•
the
form before begh presenttRP NNE
w 1 COPY FO LA
residen notesN l'
writ~ISH
FU _ A
Aaul'"~ tiori,
an oYgari1Za
speaL f oY
If atiOri
oYganiz
r1aYri~
official capacY~-
~i~ ri wisk`es to spe~~sf--'
t
whlc G -
Sub~ect on k ear-~:'^ as .0,J aze
~,~.ckCc-e _ he p°di~m a leSOOT, i d ~eglst e ta~a .
to comp Y riaYn
step oUY ov have
ber to randy state y If you
lease Yelneb the chair, officer ana eseritatt° ssiori,PL~ASE
eCOV"e he pYesb g Y'Y`irig entto heC ~G FII'ES
toYYri ce before wishtolp FGRpLA
YesYderi test' ~X~gp, CGPY
wYit~IS~ AN ,
iStYation
'fo loll
Regal
h to address
is
who
(F°~ persons w
I~eennY
pate of
No•
Agersda ltern _
_ Name y -
Address lion,
aniZa
ars org
of orgarsiZatiO~:
if speal"rs
Name
1 capaci~:
S eakez s of f icia
p ak•
ens°Y` Wishes to
spe
ub,ect on Which p ou are
on as y
as s° istrati°n
fete reg e arsd
the )06:Wm d
ember to ste`and y co a e your na ° have
-'lease re by the officer znd tati° ss o y PLEp,S~
esen n,
xec° to the pre beg wing ntto Y`e poNNG F-LAS.
form ce befor . topr O-ZpL
(fop Y F
residers o~W
test'EXTRA
wUt~-S~ AN
F
G
' on form ion)
i tl
stra
f V ! i iss
J G Reg ish to address the Cornlr
p,: persons who w
Date o f Meeting
rida Item
p,ge
~ 73-
Name
-7 '
Address .
for an Organization,
If speaking
ation
Name Of organiz
U
S eaker s official G
to speak
wishes .
on
n which pets
f} 1L
Subject 0':'w az ou are
U soon as y
anon
C to step to the o dl co pleted regame and
have
mber handy state Your ou
please reme chair,
reco a by the officer and tation• If y SE
residing our presen ssion,PLEA
to the p inning y the CONK 1NILES
form before beg entto IG F
residence wishtopres 1
writtenn°tesY EXZ~'COPY FO
F6051, AN 1 F~~ 1
gegistvation form ssion)
For persons who wish to address the COQ
CO)
Date of Meeting
Agenda Item N°
NO C
N ame Qu
address
anizatior"
If speaking for an °rg
of organization:
Name L
Speakers °f~c1a1~ ~rpa-
eak:
Subject on v~,luch person wishes to sp ~
l
w, f~,^~e~ -
as °u are
to the podium as so on registration
dr name and
Please remember to step our complete
chair, handy state y° ou have
recozed by the officer and esentanon• If yrLEASE
the presiding ing y°ur p ssion
form to before beglnn G FILES'
residence uwish to present t R P Al NI
writtennotesyEXTRA CO FO
FU-FNISFI AN
G
jZegiStration Form
who wish to address the Commission)
(For persons w
Date of Meeting
Agenda Item NO
~ e uG-n
Namev ~Address ~
for an organization,
If speaking
Name of organization: -
Speaker's official capacity:
ect on which person wishes to speak:
Subs ~
as soon as you are
to the podium . tration
hand your completed reg
Please remember t( ~ hairp, our name and
recognized y officer and state y ou have
form to the presiding presentation- If y
ring your ssion,PLEASE
residence before wish to present to the ComteG FILES.
writtennotesN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANN
FURNISH s'
II
1
c
4-
s
R
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
It
1
Registration Form
(For persons who wish to address the Commission)
Date of Meeting
Agenda Item No.,
Miress ci 3 ALJ e-
If speaking for an organization,
Name of organization: '
Speaker's official capacity:
Subject on which person wishes to speak:
Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are
recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration
form to the presiding officer and state
ve
entationrIf youe haand
residence before beginning your p e
ASE
written notes you wish to present tt PLANNING FILES.
FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR
Registration Form
(For persons who wish to address the Commission)
Date of Meeting
Agenda Item No.
Name
Address C
If speaking for an organization,
Name of organization:
Speaker's official capacity:
Subject on /which person wishes to speak:
rl 1 L 1. r' ` ~ ~c! l
Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are
recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration
form to the presiding officer and state your name and
residence before beginning your presentation. If you have
written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE
FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES.
1
Registration Form
(For persons who wish to address the Commission)
Date of Meeting / /21 o o
Agenda Item No. F
Name A/01- f C /3 a U rA „ )g
Address
If speaking for an organization,
Name of organization:
Speaker's official capacity:
Subject on which person wishes to speak:
I n,
p
L C re -.P- k
Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are
recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration
form to the presiding officer and state your name and
residence before beginning your presentation. If you have
written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE
FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES.
4
Registration Form
(For persons who wish to address the Commission)
Date of Meeting
Agenda Item No.
Name
Address Cpl v~
If speaking,for an organization,
Name of organizati0
S f t G A vv\, c u w\n e
Speaker's offici 1 capacity:
1J R
Subject on which person wishes t speak:
C_ o nv_', , G~ a✓\
Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are
recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration
form to the presiding officer and state your name and
residence before beginning your presentation. If you have
written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE
FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES.
a
c
Z
b
G
C
R
C
Q