Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/06/2005 - Minutes - Planning & Zoning Commission.MINUTES CITY OF COLLEGE ST;ITION Planaiui, v Dr-v~°Iop;rre~zi .Ceruic~s Regular Meeting. Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, October 6, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambeii•s, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Scott Shafer, John Nichols, Bill Davis, Marsha Sanford, Dennis Christiansen and Harold Strong. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Ken Reynolds. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Ron Gay. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT:. Staff Planner Lindsay Boyer, Molly Hitchcock, Crissy Hartl and Jennifer Reeves, Senior Assistant City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Graduate Civil Engineers Carol Cotter and Josh Norton, Transportation Planner Ken Fogle, Assistant Director Lance Simms, and Staff Assistant Lisa Lindgren. OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: Assistant City Attorney Roxanne Nemcik and Action Center Representative Justine Wolf. Call meeting to order. Chairman Shafer called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. 2. Hear Visitors None. 3. Consent Agenda. 3.1 Presentation, discussion, and possible ..action on a Preliminary .Plat for the Valley Park Center consisting of 4 lots on 11.63 acres generally located at northwest corner of Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818) and Raymond Stotzer Parkway (FM 60). Case #05-129 (TF/AG) 3.2 Presentation, discussion,. and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for the Spring Creek. Commons Subdivision consisting of 5 lots on 50.547 acres, developing in 4 phases and generally located at the northeast corner of Greens Prairie Road and SH 6. Case #05-1G1(LB/AB) P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda October 6, 2005 Page 1 of 7 3.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat .for Edelweiss Gartens Phase 9 consisting of 42 lots on 10.244 acres, generally located on the west end of Eagle Avenue; southwest of the extension of Brandenburg Lane. Case #05-157 (JR~JN) 3.4 Discussion and possible action on: Minutes -September 15, 2005, Regular Meeting Commissioner. Bill Davis motioned to approve the items on the consent agenda. Commissioner Dennis Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Regular Agenda. 4. Consideration, discussion and possible. action on request(s) for absence from meetings. None. 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. None. 6. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on an ordinance to amend the City's thoroughfare plan .east of the Earl Rudder Freeway South, between North Forest Parkway and Raintree Drive. Case #05-163 (KF) I~en Fogle, Transportation Planner, presented the thoroughfare plan reminding the Commission that the rezoning and master plan were tabled at the September 15, 2005 meeting. He stated that those items would be heard on the agenda at-the present meeting along with the thoroughfare plan. Mike McClure, 9262" Brookwater Circle, College Station,. Texas. Mr. McClure stated that he was a resident of Woodcreek. He also stated that the. East by-pass was a long distance traffic mover. He stated that the residents of Woodcreek. help in congesting that are because they do .not have a secondary route, which would. be Appomattox. Mr. McClure agreed that the lots that front on those streets need to be mitigated and that there was a need to keep the arterials open. Steve Arden, 311 Cecelia Loop, College Station, Texas. Mr. Arden stated that the location of the subdivision was amid-way between Emerald Forest and Raintree outlets to the east by-pass. HE also stated that they are trying to mitigate any increase in traffic by having the two 90 degree turns. He continued stating that the Raintree is the only route that does tend to funnel. whatever traffic there may be in the location. Mr. Arden felt that by having a parallel system for the most part outside of Raintree as an alternate route would help disburse the traffic. He stated that he was concerned about the 12 to 15 acres on the backside of the old Westinghouse plant and Raintree, saying that the. property will change some day and it has every right to utilize the .two streets in Raintree that stub out to that property. Mr. Arden stated that Appomattox .will not be extended until that property is developed. Commissioner John Nichols asked staff that if it was such a good idea to have this road built out to allow a secondary access, then why the City can't find a way to get it done. P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda October 6, 2005 Page 2 of 7 Mr. Fogle stated that this .could take place as part. of the. Capital Improvement Program. Following the approval of thin item, discussions will be able "to begin to take place at the Council'level. Commissioner John Nichols motioned to approve the recommendation to Council to amend the City's thoroughfare plan in order to connect Raintree Drive to North Forest. Parkway and to extend Appomattox Drive. Commissioner Harold Strong seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 7. Presentation, discussion,. and possible action on a Rezoning from A-O Agricultural Open to R-1 Single Family for Fojtik consisting of approximately 45 acres of the Fojtik tract, generally located off. of North Forest Parkway to the north and just east of Earl Rudder Freeway . Case #05-139 (JR) This item was tabled. at the September 15, 2005, meeting. Commissioner John Nichols motioned to remove the item from the table. Commissioner .Bill Davis seconded the motion, motion .passed (6-0). Jennifer Reeves, Staff Planner, presetned the. rezoning. Ms. Reeves stated that staff recommended approval of the rezoning and that the item was in compliance of the Land Use Plan. Commissioner Marsha Sanford asked staff for clarification regarding the surface water drainage and how it would be managed. Ms. Reeves stated that. the developer would have to comply with the city of College Station's drainage ordinance. Josh Norton, Graduate Civil Engineer, stated that there is a proposed detention pond near a tributary of Carter's Creek. Steve Arden. stated that the. detention pond was not built yet, but it is a concept. He mentioned that they would like to do a retention. pond, cry pond verses wet pond. Mr. Arden also said that it should not impact anyone because the tributary is through the tract. Commissioner Marsha Sanford asked if there would be problems with keeping the retention ponds clean and if the water would back up in the area. Mr. Arden stated that when development occurs it stabilizes the tributary and structures are added and this helps keep it clean. He stated that if an area is undeveloped that is when it tends to back up. Commissioner. Bill. Davis motioned to approve the recommended rezoning. Commissioner Dennis Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 8. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Master Development Plan for the Fojtik tract consisting of 47.7 acres generally located off of North Forest. Parkway to the north, and just east o£ Earl Rudder Freeway. Case #05-140 (JR/JN) P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda October 6, 2005 Page 3 of 7 This item was tabled at the September 15, 2005,. meeting. Commissioner John Nichols motioned to remove the item .from the table. Commissioner Bill Davis seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Commissioner. John Nichols motioned for approveal of the Master Development Plan a presented including. the recommended stub out .change for Appomattox. Commissioner Harold Strong seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 9. Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action on a .Comprehensive Plan Amendment to amend the Land Use. Plan for 450 Earl Rudder Freeway South and vicinity from Floodplain and Streams to Regional Retail. State Highway 6, the .College .Station City Limits and University Drive East delineate the area for consideration. Case #05-164 (TF) Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, presented the item which was for. the consideration of an amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The property owner is requesting to amend the land use plan from Floodplain and Streams to Regional Retail for a portion of the property, and the city of College Station is concurrently requesting to amend the plan in the vicinity where General Commercial zoning is established and commercial development has occurred or is anticipated. The property owner has obtained a fill permit from the City i8n compliance with the City's. drainage ordinance and policies for reclamation. Staff recommends approval of the request as presented. and described as follows: ^ Amend the portion of the. subject tract as requested located at 450 Earl Rudder Freeway South fYOm Floodplain and Streams to Regional Retail. ^ Amend parcels to the south that are. zoned C-1, General Commercial from Floodplain and Streams to Regional Retail as shown. Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan Engineering, 504 University Drive, College Station, Texas. Ms. Morgan stated that the property has been held for a number of years by a gentleman that has tried. to develop the property by selling it to numerous people. The property was filled back in the early 1980's, above what was the. existing floodplain. Ms. Morgan also stated that the things like. the by-pass affect rises in the water surface elevations. She also mentioned that there was a sewer line that cut diagonally across the property some years ago and. the property. owner had the sewer line re-routed around the perimeter of the property. An easement abandonment process us underway because when the sewer line was re=routed to preserve the center of it for development the .existing sewer line was grout filled. and abandoned, but the actual abandonment paperwork that goes to the courthouse which releases that easement off the property was never filed for record. At this time the paperwork is underway even though the work was done back in 1982. The property owner has expended some. funds with the intent for developing the property or finding someone that would develop the property. Ms. Morgan asked the Commissioners to take a look at their handouts and view the existing comprehensive plan area. She stated that on the cross hatch pattern the area of the fill can be viewed easily because it is basically barren of vegetation in the aerial photograph. She stated that all the. trees surround the plateau of the property, surrounding the outer perimeter. Ms. Morgan stated that they are not asking for a rezoning for any of that outer perimeter that has the mature vegetation on it. She stated that they are asking for a comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning on the area that was barren of vegetation. P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda October 6, 2005. Page 4 of 7 Commissioner Bill Davis asked how much fill would have to be added to the site. Ms. Morgan stated that it varies across the property, but it will be anywhere from one to two feet. She stated that part of the fill. is not necessarily just to bring it outside the floodplain. But, as Alan Gibbs had mentioned, FEMA's regulations allow for flood fringe development and the City's drainage ordinance. currently allows fox: flood fringe fill. She stated that in FEMA's model ordinance the fringe fill affects aone-foot rise in flood elevations, so all of the buildings need to be elevated. at least a foot above the base flood elevation. That is why some of the fill is being brought in, in order to affect the essential one foot rise as well. Commissioner Nichols stated that. the buildings that were bu8ilt upstream from the area do not have the luxury of raising. themselves one foot to deal with the rise that occurred. Ms. Morgan stated that on the particular stretch of stream, .they were fortunate: enough that her firm were the engineers on a Burton Creek project several years ago. Therefore, they had the hydraulic models of that particular reach of stream so they were ..able to put in the additional fill and it had no rise affect in the flood plain elevation upstream from the area. Ms. Morgan stated that he area in question what FEMA calls an ineffective flow area because the bridge is so close and because of that the water tends to neck itself down into that bridge, and, because the property is in that ineffective flood area you see no affect in the hydraulic models. Ms. Morgan mentioned. that she has heard the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council for a while now talk about flood fringe .development, greenways and open space and some of their desires. She stated that there is a very big disconnect in the City ordinances, stating that the way the rules .are currently setup they are not set up to give the City that. Commissioner Nichols stated that he hoped that if Ms. Morgan. had insight to these issues that she would be involved in the discussion of the public hearings regarding the changing of the rules, Chairman Shafer .agreed with this comment. Ms. Morgan informed the Commission rezonings are not really connected to the flood plain development and on what is trying to be achieved with open space and greenways. She stated that throughout the City there are properties that are zoned R-1 that are really not appropriate for R-T and it is because of the history of the .property when it was brought in as R-1 development when it was annexed. Ms. Morgan mentioned that these situations occur throughout town that tend to cause problems in the future as people come in to try to develop and the zonings are not appropriate any longer. She also said that there are also difficulties, on this item in that some of the property is being requested for a rezoning from R-1 to C-1 but the remainder is being left as R-1. Initially it came in as A-0 because we wanted to shows a good faith effort that the land is not being touched in the A-0 area. But, the difficulty is that the.City's ordinance states that A-O has to be a minimum of five acres. Ms. Morgan stated that the acreage was not five acres so it could not be presented as A-O because of the acreage limit. She also said that she believes there should be a different zoning district so that open space and greenways do not have a size limitation. Commissioner Davis asked about the significant amount of work. that had been done in the previous six to eight months on the underpass where the creek had gone through. He asked why the upgrade initiative occurred and was it because the flow was not sufficient. Alan Gibbs. stated that he believed the concern of the Texas Department of Transportation was pr8imarily erosion.. Commissioner Davis stated that he found it ironic that if the concern was erosion because of the hydraulics because. of the funneling neck affect that it emphasizes the need for flood plain resolution of some kind. He stated that there seemed to be dilemma of a fill situation and the Commission and being asked to do something that he personally P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda October 6, 2005 Page 5 of 7 found not satisfactory. Commissioner Davis stated that his personal opinion was that this particular comprehensive plan request would be to cut that area out until there was time for more discussion and change the area that is already built up with the Home Depot and the Olive Garden. Commissioner Marsha Sanford stated that the Gateway Villas was approved and developed in the flood plain. Ms. Morgan asked the Commissioners to look at the cross hatched area on the handout showing a floodplain map amendment for a portion of the Home Depot property, and stated that all of the Home Depot property and some of the Gateway property was also floodplain fringe development. Commissioner Sanford stated that her understanding was .that the-whole area was floodplain. Ms. Morgan stated that it was not the whole area, but the back portion was the floodplain area. Commissioner John. Nichols asked for the date of the borders that were shown, he wanted to know if that. was today's floodplain or was .that before the fill. was done to raise Gateway Villas. Ms. Morgan stated that the cross hatched area on the photograph as from the City's GIS map and the origin. was probably the 1992 time line. Commissioner Sanford asked. if there had been any impact studies completed on the property. Alan Gibbs stated that the floodplain was originally studied and. defined in 1979 and became effective in 1980. and, other than minor additions; it has essentially been the same for the past 25 years. He stated that .approximately 3 years ago the City of Bryan contracted with Mitchell and Morgan to .restudy the entire Burton Creek. drainage basin. Throught he study, and incorporating some fothe word done with Gateway, that study was completed and the .elevations that were used to evaluateboth the fill on the subject site as well as Gateway in general referenced study that was done. Mr. Gibbs stated that with the updated study and the property being filled, that he is comfortable with this. Commissioner Davis motioned to recommend tot City Council that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment be amended to change the area currently zoned C- 1 to reflect Regional Retail This area includes the access. drive back to Home Depot and straight up in front of the Gateway Villas.. Commissioner Harold Strong seconded the motion. Chairman Shafer restated the motion for clarificat6ion. He stated that would amend the Comprehensive Plan to include the area currently zoned C-1 and exclude the area requested by the applicant (currently zoned R-1). The motioned passed (4-2). Commissioners Scott Shafer, Dennis Christiansen, Bill Davis and Harold .Strong approved the motion. Commissioner Marsha Sanford and John Nichols opposed the motion. 10. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for a portion of a tract of land consisting affecting 4.435 acresgenerally located at 450 Earl. Rudder Freeway South approximately 1500 north of the SH 6/University Drive intersection along the southboundfrontage road from R-1, Single-family Residential to C-1, General Commercial Case #05-160 (TF/JN) Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, presented the rezoning. Mr. Fletcher stated that the item is shortened due to the negative-recommendation of the. Land Use Plan Amendment. The applicant was proposing to rezone a 4.435-acre tract portion out of the 10-acre tract that P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda October 6, 2005 Page 6 of 7 would be reclaimed from the floodplain. Of that remaining acreage, 4.47 acres would retain the R-1 zoning and out of those 10 acres, 1.08 acres are actually in the City of Bryan and zoned commercial. Staff had recommended. approval of the rezoning as requested based on a positive recommendation regarding the Land Use Plan Amendment request. Veronica Morgan stated that they will present to staff the hydraulic runs that the Commission had asked for.. Ms. Morgan. stated that she feels. that the hydraulic runs will have the technical data for the Council to see that shows that there is no rise with the additional fill on the property.. She also stated .that Council can then take that .into consideration for the full Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Bill Davis asked Roxanne Nemcik, Assistant City Attorney, if a variance could be granted if there is a requirement that there has to be 5 acres in order to be zoned A- O. Ms. Nemcik stated that this could not be done at this meeting. Ms. Nemcik stated that she would need to check into this, but she did not thing that a variance could be granted. Mr. Fletcher stated that due to the negative recommendation on the previous item, the Commissioners. have two options. The first option was to table the item and the second option was to follow suit with the previous. item. Commissioner John Nichols motioned to table the item to approve the rezoning Commissioner Dennis Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 11. Adjourn. Commissioner Sill Davis motioned to adjourn. Commissioner John Nichols seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Approved: --•-,.._ Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning. Commission Attest: Lisa indgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda October 6, 2005 Page 7 of 7