Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/19/2004 - Minutes - Planning & Zoning Commission MINUTES Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, August 19, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. College Station - Council Chambers, College Station City Hall Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future 1101 Texas Avenue Colleqe Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, Reynolds, and White. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Happ and Maloney. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Development Services Director Dunn, Economic Development Director Foutz, Assistant City Manager Brown, City Planner Kee, Development Manger Ruiz, Assistant Development Manager George, Assistant City Attorney Nemcik, Senior Planner Fletcher, Transportation Planner Fogle, Graduate Civil Engineers Cotter and Thompson, Public Works Director Smith, Staff Planners Prochazka, Hitchcock, Reeves, and Boyer, Planning Intern Perez, Action Center Representative Wolf, and Staff Assistant Hazlett. Chairman Shafer called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. I. Hear Citizens. None. 2. Consent Agenda. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the consent agenda items. Commissioner White seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, Reynolds, and White. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: None. 2.1 Approved by consent the minutes: ■ August 5, 2004 Workshop Minutes • August 5, 2004 Regular Minutes 2.2 Approved by consent a Preliminary Plat for Stonebrook Subdivision consisting of 95 lots and a reserve tract on 17.327 acres located at the intersection of Old Rock Prairie Road with the new alignment of Rock Prairie Road. (04-160) 2.3 Approved by consent a Final Plat for the Williams Creek Subdivision PH1 consisting of 24 lots on 38.7 acres generally located at Greens Prairie Road and Rock Prairie Road East. (04-163) 2.4 Approved by consent a Final Plat for Our Saviour's Lutheran Church, Lot 1, Block 1 consisting of 7.628 acres, located at the northeast corner of State Highway 6 and Woodcreek Drive. (04-175) P&Z Minutes August 19, 2004 Page 1 of 10 2.5 Approved by consent a Final Plat for E.M. Jones Farm Place Lot 2 consisting of 1 lot on 7 acres generally located at Krenek Tap Road and Central Park Lane. (04-178) Regular Agenda. 3. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. None. 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. None. 5. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for Gateway Phase 1R and a Final Plat for the Gateway Phase 3 Lot 1R consisting of 4 lots on 22.7 acres generally located at University Drive East at Forest Drive. (04-155) Graduate Civil Engineer Thompson presented the Staff Report. Mr. Thompson stated that Lot 1R is being further divided into Lot 1AR, Lot 8 and Lot 12. Lot 8 is currently Gateway Station whereas the other lots are undeveloped at this time. He added that all the properties are accessed from University Drive at the signalized intersection. Mr. Thompson reported that there were several requirements placed on the Gateway during the rezoning. One was that Phase 3 is required to provide access to the adjacent lot to the West. A note to this effect is included on the plat. He added that Phase 2, 3, and 4 also include floodplain and floodway, as shown on the plat. Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing. Terry Barr, Mitchell and Morgan agreed with Staff, adding two modifications: (1) Note #10 added to plat that states all utilities to be located underground in order to promote the aesthetics of the property; (2) No requirement to add a 20' easement. Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. Some discussion regarding utilities and the easement ensued. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the replat with Staff comments. Commissioner White seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, Reynolds, and White. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: None. Commissioner White motioned to approve the final plat. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, Reynolds, and White. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: None. 6. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning of 12.49 acres, generally located near the southeast intersection of Harvey Mitchell Parkway and the future Dartmouth Street extension, from R-1 Single Family Residential to P-MUD Planned Mixed Use Development with the OV Overlay District. (04-161) P&Z Minutes August 19, 2004 Page 2 of 10 Staff Planner Prochazka presented the Staff Report, stating that approval of the rezoning is recommended. Staff is also supporting the application of the overlay district on the property because of the proximity to the City Center project. Ms. Prochazka pointed out the Land Use Plan designations on the subject property. She reported that approximately 4.5 acres at the south end of the proposed rezoning area is within the 100-year floodplain and that the Greenways Program supports approval of the P-MUD, with the 100-year floodplain reserved as designated greenway on the Concept Plan. A Concept Plan is required to be approved by the Design Review Board prior to development of this property. The Parks & Recreation Board, the Greenways Program Manager, and Development Services staff will review the Concept Plan and make a recommendation to the Design Review Board. She pointed out that if the Commission should approve the application of the OV Overlay District, they have determined that the subject property is located along a gateway or major corridor to the City. Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing. Veronica Morgan, Mitchell and Morgan Engineering, displayed a concept plan of the overall layout of the proposed project and pointed out various destination points within the project as well as the vegetated and floodplain areas. She stated that discussions are underway regarding the final designs and that flexibility for the creation of the design is a major component. She answered questions regarding the greenway and the reclamation of some areas as well as questions regarding the zoning. The applicant, Kenny Cotten, made a brief presentation regarding the aesthetics of the project, stating that with it being a pedestrian mall, it will prove to be a destination point for the city. Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. Ms. Prochazka clarified the specifics regarding the P-MUD zoning district, the OV Overlay District, and the process by which the project will go before the Design Review Board for approval. There was also a brief discussion regarding parking setbacks. Designation concerns regarding the floodplain will be addressed during the platting process. Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the rezoning from R-1 Single Family Residential to P-MUD Planned Mixed Use Development and the application of the OV Overlay District, determining that the subject property is located along a gateway or major corridor to the City. Commissioner White seconded the motion, which carried by a unanimous vote of 7-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, Reynolds, and White. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: None. 7. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on an Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan by amending the Land Use Plan and the Thoroughfare Plan for an area generally described as Pebble Creek Subdivision. (04-138) Senior Planner Fletcher presented the Staff Report. Mr. Fletcher displayed a copy of the Comprehensive Plan and described in depth the details of the ordinance and amendments, which involves four parcels of land. He stated that Staff recommends amending the Land Use Plan designations for the four parcels as requested. Staff P&Z Minutes August 19, 2004 Page 3 of 10 also recommends approval of the request to amend the Thoroughfare Plan for the Spearman Drive realignment. However, Staff does not support the request to amend Congressional Drive, but rather recommends that it should remain on the Plan as is. In conclusion, Mr. Fletcher summarized the proposed changes for the benefit of the audience. Some discussion regarding street alignment ensued as well as other alternative access ways. Staff pointed out that traffic concerns would be addressed at the time of the rezonings. In addition, it was noted that with the current Spearman alignment, the R-1 zoning district would be affected by significant buffer standards through the UDO (Unified Development Ordinance). Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing. The following people spoke during the time of the public hearing: Jessica Jimmerson, Planning and Land Use Solutions, asked the Commission's approval of all six items presented. She stated that changes over time in the market and with different codes and ordinances that apply to the tract have been instrumental in causing the situation with the Congressional alignment. She stated that the applicant is asking that the Congressional connection be removed from the Thoroughfare Plan. The applicant, Davis Young, 806 Coral Ridge East, commented on each of the four parcels as follows: Parcel 1 - No market to build more of that type of infrastructure as shown on land use plan; Parcel 2 - A destination office center for professional businesses; not visible from roadway or the residents that back up to it; Parcel 3 - No plans for development at this time; Parcel 4 - Not desirable to market as residential; Spearman is not beneficial for development; Congressional extension could be negative; There are issues with the oil pad site on the property; adjacent to city's business park; Supported as commercial on city's land use plan; Potential to open neighborhood to safety issues. Ron Edmonds, a resident on Birdie Court, expressed concern regarding the amount of easement between a subdivision and office buildings. He does not want the backside of a mail from the backside of his home. Ron Kaiser, 4601 Colonial Circle, outlined his reasons for opposing the changes in the Land Use Plan. He pointed out that notification letters are not sent to property owners regarding items going before the Design Review Board for consideration. Ted Hopgood, 4600 Oakmont Circle spoke in support of the applicant's proposal. Sharon Kelly, 4600 Slice Court, expressed concerns regarding traffic flow, dispersing, and safety. She suggested a traffic study for Spearman. Rick Dusold, 4602 Oakmont Circle, expressed zoning district concerns. He encouraged the Commission to keep in mind the applicant's plans when the zonings are submitted for consideration and approval. Emil Ogden, 4600 Spyglass Court, spoke in favor of the applicant's proposal. Davis Young interjected that the zoning ordinance has a building height requirement based on the distance from the homes in the subdivision. In addition, the fact that Spearman runs directly behind the homes adds additional buffering between the two. P&Z Minutes August 19, 2004 Page 4 of 10 He stated that he plans to allow the native buffer to remain. He added that the office buildings would be small 5,000 square feet buildings unlike the large ones in a typical business park. Larry Bicket, 800 Four Court, expressed concerns regarding traffic funneling and safety. He stated that a traffic light at Lakeway and Greens Prairie is needed. Doug Hess, 802 Fore Court, stated that he paid a premium for his property because of the lack of flow-through traffic. He expressed concern regarding drainage problems with the extension of Spearman as well as traffic concerns with egress and ingress related to Greens Prairie. Pat Brunes, 801 Fore Court, is also concerned with the amount of traffic for the area and stated that options to relieve traffic in and out of Pebble Creek should be considered. (No name) Objected to the extension of Pebble Creek Parkway going beyond Pebble Creek Development Company property. Thor Hoppess, 5101 Spanish Bay, and President of the Home Owner's Association, referenced the letter sent to the Commission. He asked that alternative exits be considered because he believes the extension from Lakeway into Pebble Creek would set the neighborhood up for cut-through traffic, which would cause safety and security issues. Brian Bochner, 5111 Bellerive Bend Drive, City Liaison Committee Vice Chair, supports the realignment of Spearman but opposes the extension of Congressional, stating that it would not be suitable for a collector. He said that the Greens Prairie intersection at the State Highway 6 intersection would become congested. He encouraged the Staff to find alternative solutions. Commissioner Davis interjected that there will always be traffic issues as long as development is continuing. He stated that the Commission could look at how to minimize the impact and yet achieve goals for safe traffic ingress and egress. Stephen Atkins, 716 Royal Adelade, affirmed the points mentioned by the two proceeding speakers. He agreed that a signal light is necessary on Greens Prairie Road. He pointed out that other developers are contributing to the traffic problems. Also, he stated that there is a need for northern bound roadways. Todd Huebner, 823 Plum Hollow, presented a petition of over 239 signatures asking that the access to the southern side of Pebble Creek not be allowed. He stated that when the State Highway 6 plan is completed, it would provide them with the needed traffic relief. Mr. Huebner is in favor of the Spearman option and believes it will reduce the traffic associated with the school. He added that the new entrance to State Highway 6 that is planned would also reduce the school traffic. Chad Bohne, 710 Berry Creek, expressed concerns regarding traffic. He believes the ramp changes proposed by TxDOT will be a major improvement, but that an alternative route to Lakeway that would bypass the school is needed. He stated that the median openings are also possible issues. Robert Hepman, Birdie Court, stated that although the residents do not support the extension of Congressional as it is proposed, they do support some sort of southern access. He stated that a traffic study is needed for the existing problems. P&Z Minutes August 19, 2004 Page 5 of 10 Dave Parrets, 708 Kingsman Court, asked the Commission to take a long view of Congressional as it is short-sited and if created could be named crime and accident corridor. This is of great concern to many of the Pebble Creek residents. The Congressional Avenue connection is not wanted. Mr. Bohne interjected that some other form of access is needed in that section of Pebble Creek in order to allow traffic access Lakeway. Ron Kaiser, 4601 Colonial, recommended that the Commission table the proposal, take no action at this time, and perform a traffic study using a traffic engineer. Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. Commissioner White motioned to approve the Land Use Plan amendment for Parcel 1. Commissioner Fedora seconded the motion. Chairman Shafer expressed concern about the entire block being rezoned to Regional Retail. He felt the AP, Administrative Professional would provide a less intensive land use next to the school and the existing residences. He hopes that as the rezonings are submitted that the Commission will consider the influence on the neighborhood adjacent the more southern part of the tract. Commissioner White concurred. He encouraged the Staff to meet with the school district regarding this parcel and how it may be impacted. Chairman Shafer called the question. The motion to approve the Land Use Plan amendment for Parcel 1 carried by a vote of 7.0 FOR: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, Reynolds, and White. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: None. There was some discussion regarding Parcels 2 and 3 in regards to the zoning classification and uses. The underlying zoning is unaffected with the Land Use Plan amendment. Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the rezoning of Parcels 2 and 3 to PDD, Planned Development District as proposed. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion. Senior Planner Fletcher clarified that Parcel 3 preserves the floodplain area and that buffer concerns can be addressed at the time of rezoning. Chairman Shafer called the question. The motion carried, 7-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, Reynolds, and White. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: None. Commissioner White motioned to approve the Land Use Plan amendment for Parcel 4. Commissioner Reynolds seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, Reynolds, and White. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: None. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the Thoroughfare Plan amendment as proposed. Commissioner Nichols seconded the motion. Commissioner Davis explained that implementing the existing plan is not a good solution and neither is doing nothing at all. If the change is implemented it may not be the solution today, but depending on the speed of development in the area, we P&Z Minutes August 19, 2004 Page 6 of 10 may have a solution in a year. People will be impacted. He stated that he agreed with many of the comments but hopes that the changes will provide potential for positive benefits. Commissioner Fedora interjected that the problem lies with Greens Prairie Road. He stated than another ingress/egress is the answer because there has to be an alternative to getting in and out of the area. He said the traffic alleviation is in the future in seeing plans and projects completed. Further discussion ensued. Chairman Shafer called the question. The motion to approve the Thoroughfare Plan amendment carried by a vote of 6-1. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Hooton, Nichols, Reynolds, and White. AGAINST: Fedora. ABSENT: None. Commissioner White motioned to remove Congressional Drive from the Thoroughfare Plan between Lakeway and St. Andrews Drive as proposed. There was no second to the motion. Therefore, the motion failed. Commissioner Davis motioned to leave Congressional Drive on the Thoroughfare Plan as is and deny the proposed request. Since there was not a second to the motion, the motion failed. Commissioner Davis motioned to recommend that a traffic study be performed for a southern egress out of Pebble Creek and the feasibility and advisability of doing that as our recommendation to the City Council. Therefore, Congressional Drive remains on the Thoroughfare Plan. The question is what we take to City Council. My recommendation would be, since we have considerable opposition to Congressional going through, that we at least recommend to the City Council that we look at the situation in Pebble Creek with Congressional and decide whether there is validity on either side. The motion failed due to the lack of a second. Commissioner Nichols motioned to leave Congressional Drive on the Thoroughfare Plan but to direct Staff to evaluate appropriate intersections in order to avoid direction connection with the existing Congressional Drive in order to provide ingress/egress. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion. Commissioner White encouraged the Staff and members of the Home Owner's Association to continue to meet to explore other options and alternatives. Chairman Shafer stated that some kind of relief is necessary and that the new plan should not create the kind of problems cited tonight nor should it adversely impact the neighborhood. Chairman Shafer called the question. The motion carried 6-1. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, and Reynolds. AGAINST: White. ABSENT: None. The Commission convened at 9:50 for a 10-minute recess. 8. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on an Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan by amending the Land Use Plan and Thoroughfare Plan for a 1,282.09-acre tract located east of SH 6 between the Pebble Creek Subdivision and the College Station City Limits. (04-158) P&Z Minutes August 19, 2004 Page 7 of 10 The Commission reconvened at 10 p.m. Senior Planner Fletcher presented the Staff Report. He stated that Staff recommends approval of the amendment. A graphic display of the current Thoroughfare Plan and Land Use Plan were displayed. He pointed out the subject area. He explained the proposed Thoroughfare Plan. He stated that there is a spine corridor servicing the entire development that ultimately will reach Peach Creek Road. TxDOT's proposed changes show a grade separation opposite Nantucket Drive associated with the freeway construction, frontage road improvement, and the entry and exit ramp reconfiguration. The minor arterial would benefit from the proximity of the grade separation opposite Nantucket. Mr. Fletcher pointed out that there was a change in the Land Use Plan on the original proposal in regards to densities. The reason for the change is the inclusion of conservation subdivision design principals with the preservation of creeks and natural habitat areas, green spaces and trail systems. He added that the Land Use Density is measured over the gross parcel. There is also a neighborhood retail component proposed for the middle of the development. Staff met regarding related issues such as greenways that are being preserved and mitigation sites being proposed. There is a strong inclination to preserve the natural component along the creek. Staff also met regarding utilities and is working in concert with consultants on water and wastewater regional master plan. This will be implemented through the Thoroughfare Plan. There was some discussion regarding the minor arterial off the interchange at Nantucket. Mr. Fletcher answered concerns regarding the building of the roads and the grade separation. He stated that the Thoroughfare Plan would reflect that, should it be approved tonight. He added that it would also be indicated on the plat. Transportation Planner Fogle interjected information regarding the on and off ramp. He pointed it out on the graphic that was displayed. Mr. Fletcher stated that the other item of issue is the demonstration by Staff that this should be a minor arterial through the development. The applicant prefers a major collector. He stated that there needs to be some type of regional east-west mobility in this area more substantial than a major collector, which over time, would not be adequate as the developments build out. Mr. Fogle pointed out that Staff is looking at traffic information provided by the applicant that a minor arterial is not warranted by the traffic. However, the fact that neighboring developments would be traveling through this area to get to State Highway 6 supports Staff's recommendation. Mr. Fletcher stated that there would be approximately 1400 units at build-out for this development with a lower density than Pebble Creek, which includes a mix of dwelling unit types. He pointed out several access points for the development. Mr. Fletcher summarized Staff's recommendations for the Thoroughfare Plan. Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing. The applicant, Paul Clarke, spoke in favor of the project. He identified the ramp and stated that when he met with TXDOT, he agreed to a ramp that would lead to State Highway 6, providing an egress from the development, which is a minor change. He spoke briefly of the design for the Highway 6 widening. He pointed out that this is College Station's largest master plan community. It is the only one ever suggested under the new UDO (Unified Development Ordinance). Mr. Clarke stated that the development has six ingresses and egresses throughout the development and will potentially relieve some of the problems associated with Pebble Creek. He addressed P&Z Minutes August 19, 2004 Page 8 of 10 the recent trend of taking arterials through a development rather than around them. He stated that the emphasis should be to use the existing infrastructure in the ET7 to widen these roads. Traffic should be routed around neighborhoods and not through them. He pointed out overpasses and the fact that the roads are not lining up with anything. He asked that the road be a major collector based on their studies. He prefers not to have a county arterial run through the development. Chairman Shafer asked Mr. Clarke to clarify the difference between a major arterial and a minor collector. Mr. Clarke stated that Staff recommends raised median with curbs. He does not want that at this time because of the possible destruction of the habitat. He stated that he wants to keep the habitat close to the right-of-ways. He made further comments regarding the minor collector. Brian Bochner, 5111 Bellerive Bend Drive, stated that whatever is decided should be coordinated with the southern part of Pebble Creek and asked the Commission not to recommend approval until the issues are resolved through meetings with the staff and residents of Pebble Creek. Thor Hoppess, 5101 Spanish Bay, stated that there is an opportunity to solve a serious issue in the southeast part of College Station with providing the inlets for the development and working a way to connect to Pebble Creek Parkway. The issue with Spearman and Congressional can be eliminated by tying in to what Mr. Clarke wants to do on the very south and what the Pebble Creek residents want to do on the very north end, and particularly if Pebble Creek Parkway is tied in going north and angling back toward State Highway 6. This is an opportunity to provide an answer and open the pathway. Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Nichols asked Staff to clarify what the impact would be on Nantucket. Mr. Fogle addressed the questions. He stated that it would not be detrimental to that development. He pointed out ingress and egress points. He stated that, while the Staff does not like to see arterials splitting the middle of a development either, it would be an advantage having the interchange there to provide for regional mobility. Mr. Fletcher clarified the request including the revisions made during the final meeting with the applicant. Mr. Fogle explained the differences between a major collector and minor arterial. Some discussion regarding the 90' cross-section ensued. He also explained the difference between the county and city requirements regarding roadways, public utilities, and right-of-ways. Chairman Shafer interjected that design is critical at this stage of the development. He commented on the minor arterial and stated that he would support another cross section possibly without curb and gutter that would make it a different kind of major arterial and would tie into everything else that is located in that area. Mr. Fogle stated that the city is willing to work with the developer to preserve the natural environment. Mr. Fletcher justified the classification and clarified the proposal. The applicant and Staff agree on the Land Use Plan issues. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the Land Use Plan as proposed, with Staff recommendations. Commissioner Hooton seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. P&Z Minutes August 19, 2004 Page 9 of 10 FOR: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, Reynolds, and White. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: None. Mr. Fogle clarified the details regarding the applicant's preference for a major collector as opposed to a minor arterial. He stated that the cross section issue will be handled at the time of platting. Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the Thoroughfare Plan per Staff's recommendation, specifying that the major collector be classified as a minor arterial with direction to the Staff to work on the planning stage with the developer to protect the habitat and to be creative in designing the cross section in such a way that it will accommodate the arterial needs but also the habitat needs as best as possible. Commissioner White seconded the motion. Chairman Shafer concurred with the points Commissioner Nichols made in his motion, but also encouraged the Staff to work with the applicant in making the project an acceptable design. Chairman Shafer called the question. The motion to approve carried by a vote of 6- 1. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, and White. AGAINST: Reynolds. ABSENT: None. 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. None. 10. Adjourn. Commissioner White motioned to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Hooton seconded the motion, which carried 7-0. The meeting adjourned. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Fedora, Hooton, Nichols, Reynolds, and White. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: None. Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Susan Hazlett, Staff Assistant Development Services P&Z Minutes August 19, 2004 Page 10 of 10 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION GUEST REGIR R MEETING DATE NAME ADDRESS -I~AW /A Ji4n~ . 1. dj(`{ -16~ Cam- tJ w \a ' Yur k. (4 Matt p 4. 5. G,/ta~-cS/v (Z ka x c l'`t al~ C--AL) klE 6. VIAL - / &e 7. ~;70`7 8. Zd cm 6-~j 10. U~~S A " 7 t r 11. 2A) r` 12. t A L'tjtt A 4 L( Ciwj~- 14. LnC}/Ue cJ P 15. I C~ C s 16. 17. 18. L*l1q ~Afz7, -iN MAi M-FovY-r-, C7 19. S ~6 2 -FD -e 21. a cn L^ 22. &64elZ X/ /J.9- 23. 'TK CC LSAVC l;S;VET~s; r- A ,'S~ a f 7`L Zo y 24. i 0.. / U `•n t' ~y t.c ~2 0l j'Y«i- kwIp- 4"11 c3l?c1Q 314ell oz, 25. PLANNING & TONING COMMISSION GU ST REGISTER o MEETING DATE I Alf 1: 1 9'd L/--- t NAME ADDRESS L 2. :2338 I-JIX - 4 wt i, I. 4. GDO C 5. Ll I 'o 6114 C 7, Cf GIS 9. /oad gtjo r) I P.,~t S 10. 12. Op t lbw D x.-13 13. LZ0It~w~,-t`~° C Z? Y~'~1 14. o~ kL SDK- b a 1 ~c.. -aA 17. .i,L► -7 ► ~A c S 19. ~l l r n ~i fl 3 -o ` 2 21. ` ~~b~o P~►~e 11 ~~t~~5 'A~& 22. a;Vr Al/ y Urn ?,y 9,S 28. 9p AJ e. nws 24. d Li C S ~YS 25. 7 94/ Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission)' Date of Meeting Agenda Item No. 7 Name 'address If speaking for an organization, .Name of organization: r t Speaker's official capacity: p 4 Subject on which person wishes to speak: Please remember to step to. the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. _ Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting C q Agenda Item No. Name Address - i1 c,fz ~J c r ~1 CCV'1 If speaking for an organization, f Name of organ~a~~; rd f ^ ~ OP/1 l1(. Speaker's official capa, : " -wz Subject on which person wishes to speak: 1 L; Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to aCommission) Date of Meeting Agenda Item No. Name kddress If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: _ Speaker's official capacity: ' Subject on which person wi es t speak: Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting Q Agenda Item No. ` Name 4A/ address If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: 4 t Speaker' official capacit 4 Subject.on which person wishes to speak: Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and -residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, nLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING lLES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting Agenda Item. No. '-a,,~ Name kddress d a S f, If speaking for an organization, cu Name of organization: ; ----i~ co an ' o Speaker's official capacity: ill Subject on which person wishes to speak: Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN' EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING ,TILES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting f y ~G Agenda Item No. Name Xddress If speaking for an organization, , Name of organization:' Speaker's official capacity: AIM Subject on which person wishes to peak: `,O TO 5') s Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and -residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING r'ILES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting D Agenda Item No. Name a t`t l~ Ac 1~?CcYz-- kddress H b I C,6 (-C-!4J tkt, C. i IzG LG If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: 'C Subject on which person wishes to speak: Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you -are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, 'PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting. Agenda Item No. Name <c v t 5 Wdress If speaking for an organization; Name of oWnization: 4 Speaker's official capacity: 4 Subject on which person wishes to speak: C Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, ''LEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING .eILES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ? " Agenda Item No. Name- d& 44eLoei Address If speaking for,an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subjec on which person wishes to s eak: f 7 p~- Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you .wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING ilLES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting u 200 `f" Agenda Item No. 7 Name 5t e- j h e N h- k~ nIS Address -7 (4A n ~4 A ~ I a ~1 e 0 r If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak:' rc O N q Y` Q 5 (o '~J CL N 1 U Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting . C Agenda Item No. Name Address X11( revive 7Liof L If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's off*cial capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak: Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are, recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES.