HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/20/2003 - Minutes - Planning & Zoning CommissionMINUTES
Planning and zoning Commission
CITY of COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1101 Texas Avenue
March 20,2003
:oo P.M.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Commissioners Floyd, Williams, McMath, Shafer, Trapani and Hall
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner White.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mears and Maloney.
STAFF PRESENT: Assistant City Manager Brown, Development Services Director Templin, City
Planner Kee, Development Manager Ruiz, Assistant Development Manager
George, Assistant City Engineer McCully, Civil Engineers Thompson and
Cotter, Senior Planner Battle, Staff Planners Fletcher, Reeves and Flaner ,
Transportation Planner Fogle and Transportation Engineer Picah, Assistant
City Attorney Nemcik, Economic Development Director Foutz, Planning Intern
Harrell, Development Services Senior Customer Service Representative
Rogers and Customer Service Representatives Stanley and Elmendorf,
Action Center Representative Kelly, and Staff Assistant Hazlett.
Chairman Floyd called the meeting to order with the Pledge of Allegiance at - 00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM No. 1: Hear citizens.
AGENDA ITEM No. : Public comment for the Record.
AGENDA ITEM No. : Consent Agenda.
.1 Approved the Minutes for the Joint Workshop Meeting held on March 6, 2003.
3.2 Approved the Minutes for the Workshop Meeting held on March 6, 2003.
3.3. Approved the Minutes for the Regular Meeting held on March 6, 2003.
3.4 Approved the Final Plat for the Pebble Creek Subdivision Phase 9B consisting of 60 residential lots on 3
acres looted at 1299 Foal Adelaide. (03-11)
Regular Agenda.
4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action of request(s) for absence from meetings.
Commissioner Trapani motioned to approve the absence of Commissioner White. Commissioner Williams
seconded the motion. The motion was approved.
5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda b
Commission action.
None.
P&Z Minutes March 20, 2003 Page 1 of
9. Consideration, discussion and possible action on a Master Development Plan for Crescent Pointe,
consisting of 192.64 acres and located between FM 90 and SH 3 across from Linda Larne. This item
was previously tabled by the Commission on (larch 6, 2003. -44
Commissioner Trapani motioned to remove the item from table for consideration. The motion was seconded
by Commissioner McMath. The motion carried 6 -0.
FOR Floyd, Hall, McMath, Shafer, Williams, and Trapani.
AGAINST: None.
Development Services Director Templin reported having met with the developer and a committee of others to
create the new plan that has been submitted for the Commission's approval. He explained that throughout the
development of the project the plans would be reviewed by several beards and committees such as the Parks
and Recreation Board and the Design Review Board. In this process a high degree of detail would be required
such as the locations, relationship, and the connectivity of uses within the development that would then be
reviewed by staff and presented to the Commission for aproval.
Commissioner Trapani motioned to approve the Master Development Plan. Commissioner Shafer seconded
the motion. The motion carried 6 -0.
FOR Floyd, Shafer, Williams, Hall, McMath, and Trapani.
AGAINST: None.
7. Consideration, discussion and possible action on a Site Plan for University Commons Phase II
(Maintenance Facility, located at 2301 Eastmark Drive, in the Wolf Pen Creek zoning District. (03-35
Staff Planner Reeves presented the Staff Report. She recommended approval of the Site Plan, explaining that
the Design Review Board approved the proposal in a unanimous decision during their meeting prior to the
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. She added that the Site Plan complies with the Wolf Pen Creek
Master Plan.
Commissioner Shafer stated that he believes the proposed facility is compatible to the existing buildings.
Commissioner Trapani motioned to approve the Site Plan, which was seconded by Commissioner Williams.
.
The motion carried -0.
FOR Floyd, Shafer, Williams, Hall, McMath, and Trapani.
AGAINST: None.
8. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for the Brazos Malley Carpet outlet, Lot
9, Block 1 of the Rock Prairie West Business Park, located adjacent to old Wellborn Road, from -o
Agricultural open to C-2 Commercial- Industrial. (03-58
Staff Planner Flanery presented the Staff Report. She stated that Staff recommends approval. Ms. Flaner
also pointed out the surrounding zoning and developments and explained that the subject property was platted
last year while it was in the City's ETJ, and has since become annexed into the City. The rezoning is in
compliance with the Land Use Plan.
Chairman Floyd opened the public hearing.
Chuck Moreau, 1834 Harris Drive, spoke in favor of the rezoning.
Chairman Floyd closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Williams motioned to approve the rezoning. Commissioner Trapani seconded the motion. The
motion carried 6 -0.
FOR: Floyd, Shafer, Williams, Hall, McMath, and Trapani.
AGAINST: None.
9. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for The Glade located at 1 311
Southwest Parkway from -1 Single Family Residential to -1 A Single Family Residential. (03-45)
P&Z Minutes (March 2, 2003 Page 2 of
Development Manager Ruiz presented the Staff Report recommending approval of the rezoning. After
pointing our the surrounding zonings and land uses, Ms. Ruiz stated that there were physical obstacles that
will make high density impossible, or at the least, Very difficult. However, the rezoning is in compliance with
the Land Use Plan. She cited four areas of concern:
• Neighborhood integrity and quality
• Increased traffic in proximity to the Elementary School and the existing congestion and parking problems
• Offset intersection at Southwest Parkwa
• Overbuilding of smaller residential developments
Discussion regarding the options that would be available with the adoption of the new UDO, current density
and hoer that would be affected, street alignment, parking and lot size.
Chairman Floyd opened the public hearing.
The following citizens spoke in opposition to the rezoning. They cited reasons of lot sizes and the intrusive
and compromising affect the proposed rezoning and development would create for the neighborhood:
David Perry, 1 712 Glade
Ed Hadden, 1701 Glade
Joy Scatt, 1722 Laura Lane
Peter Gray, 1703 Glade
Dwight Conway, 1909 Bee Creek Drive
Andrew Harkins, 1911 Bee Creek Drive
Kimberly Williams, 1714 Glade
Chris Sn do r, 1807 Southwood
The following spoke in favor of the rezoning. He stated that other options were discussed with Staff:
Stewart Cling, 4101 Teas Avenue.
Chairman Floyd closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Trapani motioned to deny the rezoning. He suggested a Variance rather than rezoning property
that has been zoned -1 for such a long time. Commissioner McMath stated that the negative impact of the
increased density and traffic is a Viable reason to oppose the rezoning. In addition to that, Chairman Floyd
stated that the rezoning fails the test of preserving the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood.
Commissioner Williams seconded the motion. The motion carried 8 -0.
FOR Floyd, Shafer, Williams, Hall, McMath, and Trapani.
AGAINST ST P one.
10. Public hawing, discussion, and passible actin on a Conditional Use Permit - Use & Site for the
United Methodist Church Education and Fellowship building located at 200 College Mann. (03-57)
Chairman Floyd abstained from discussion and Voting in this matter. Commissioner Shafer will act as chair
Staff Planner Flanery presented the Staff Report stating that Staff recommends approval of the Conditional
Use Permit with Comments #2. She explained that the existing building will be razed and a new 2- stony
building will be rebuilt for the same uses, adding that this proposal is in compliance with the Land Use Plan.
Commissioner Shafer opened the public hearing.
Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, 511 University Drive East., Suitet. 204 spoke in favor of the Conditional
Use Permit.
Commissioner Shafer closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Trapani motioned for approval and was seconded by Commissioner McMath. The motion
carried 5 -1.
FOR Shafer, Williams, Hall, McMath, and Trapani.
P&Z Minutes March 20, 2003 Page 3 of
ABSTAINED ED Floyd.
AGAINST: lone.
11. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on an ordinance and a resolution amending the City of
College Station's mprehen ive Plan for the area generally bound by the proposed State Highway 40,
State Highway South, FM 2154, and Peach Creek. -
Staff Planner Fletcher presented the South College Station Thoroughfare Plan Update proposals. The City
Council's Strategic Plan has identified various aspects of hoer the Comprehensive Plan should be updated.
One of this gear's points of emphasis has been to focus on areas that are in critical need of Thoroughfare Plan
Updates. He reported that Staff has been developing proposals for this update with direction from the
Planning and Zoning Subcommittee, residents, and property owners in the study area. Mr. Fletcher reviewed
the goals and objections and the various public input opportunities used to develop the plan. He also touched
on some of the existing conditions and trends, pointing to the future transportation needs in the study area. He
stated that the primary goal is to create and maintain a balanced transportation system for various modes of
transportation. The proposed Thoroughfare Plan improves connectivity, mobility, and access while preserving
neighborhood integrity.
Transportation Planner Fogle presented planning considerations for the development of the proposed
Thoroughfare Plan. He stated that roadways, spacing, traffic volume, land use considerations, trip
generations, and physical barriers were considered in the planning. He added that the plan is created with a
20 -gear window for implementation. He added that as conditions change in the area there is opportunity to
reprise the plan. He pointed out the changes to the existing plan and the major concerns discussed during the
meetings with the property owners. Mr. Fogle stated that Staff is confident with the proposed plan and
recommends its approval, but added that some revisions were made to the plan as a result of these meetings
in order to address the concerns of the property o wners.
Development Services Director Templin stated that none of the property in the area has been condemned in
order to make any of the proposed roadways.
Mr. Fogle stated that neighboring subdivisions were contacted, including the Home Owners' Associations.
Chairman Floyd opened public hearing.
The following citizens spoke in opposition to the proposed plan citing issues of concern:
Bill Harris, 1207 Mariners Core
Integrity of the community
Roads not designed for the heavier usage that will accompany the proposed plan
Gerald Atmar, 4590 Barnstable Harbor
Recommends priority given to developing Arrington Road
Hard Hells, 1415 Harpers Ferrer
Placement of roads
Should recognize the behavior of people in the subject area
Access to the area from those living without
Adjacency traffic patterns
Penner Holmes, 4707 Scrimshaw Lane
Neighborhood Integrity
• Proposal contradicts objective
• tats of personal 12 Hour Traffic Studer
At maximum build -out, additional traffic would present a hazard
Karen Weir, 4599 Sandpiper Core
Moire the east collector
Priority of undeveloped areas over developed areas
Patricia Chulupsk, 1403 Harpers Ferrer
Existing neighborhoods should be preserved
P&Z Minutes March 2, 2003 Page 4 of
Buffering of neighborhood from future expansions approaching the established residential area
Reduction of use intensity of nearby developments in regards to their subdivision
Protect, preserve, and enhance existing neighborhood by minimizing intrusive and incompatible
land uses and density
Encroachment by putting a road in the heart of the subdivision
• Property value regarding safety?
Mike Fabins 4587 Cricket Pass
Traffic speed
Neighborhood integrity
Chris Kling, 1511 Wayfarer farer Lane
Traffic funneling from an undeveloped area into an existing residential neighborhoods
Streets are adequate, do not need street planning for existing neighborhoods
Focus should be on access to Arrington and Greens
Don Bugh, 4575 Sandpiper Core
Intersections and traffic congestion at Greens Prairie, Highway 6 and the additionally increased
traffic from Highway o = recipe for very congested intersection
Neighborhood integrity will be destroyed
Maurer Dennis, 1410 Harpers Ferrer
• Rural subdivision with high pedestrian usage
Kathleen Gose
Equestrian rural subdivision
• Integrity at stake
Children on horseback at risk
No sidewalks available
Roads are built to counter standards
Breeches the trust of the stated land use goals
Traffic is incompatible with the personality of the neighborhood
Joe Holmes, 4707 Scrimshaw Lane
• A collector by definition, collector used as arterial, design as such is necessary for the proper use
• Offset intersections are not measured at over several thousand feet
John Bryant, 1929 Arrington
Right-of-Way
Speed control /recommended speed bumps and stop signs
Minimum lighting and mini warehouses are a concern
Glenn Reirson, 16805 Calumet Drive
Additional ingress into the subdivision which would create a public safety issue
Public Safety i.e. increased vandalism and crime
More penetration to private lake area which will increase insurance liability based on risk factors
James Wallace, 16177 Woodlake
Reiterated comments already made
Matt Wagner, 16474 Riga Ridge
Open space and rural value is critical
Private Lake and habitat for wildlife
Linda Huff, 16630 Woodlake
Property turnover rate is quick because of the rural setting
Maintain the neighborhood integrity
Crime rate concerns
P&Z Minutes March 2, 2003 Page 5 of
Diane Oswald, 1 5889 Woodlake
Preserve the rural lifestyle i.e. horses, farm animals and abundance of wildlife
•� Maintain peace, quiet, and security
Endangered way of life with plan as proposed
Rejects being a new driveway for a developers new subdivision
Marque Mathis, 1 6454 11oodlake
Home would be affected by the newly proposed roadway
Sara Jane Jordan, 16400 Woodlake
• Driveway backing
• No guarantee of development density
Increase number of buses, possibly city buses in years to come
Bike routes not necessary
Natural vegetation and wildlife habitation
Paul Leming 1615 Harpers Ferrer
Economics
• Safety
Chris Noynaerk, 3620 Preakness
George Rogers, 16630 F iva Fridge
• Traffic channeling through 20 - gear old subdivision
Janie Harris, 1207 Mariners Covet
Terror Larson, 4610 Midsummer Lane
Road width and thickness concerns
Major cost issue to replace the roads
Maintain integrity and lifestyle of residents
Nona Wolf - Hager
Additional roads will bring additional unwanted traffic
• Additional road proposed will out through approximately 10 of her 35 acres and that of other
homeowners in the area
Chairman Floyd closed the public hearing.
There was a brief recess before reconvening at 9:55 p.m.
Commissioner Trapani motioned to approve and was seconded by Commissioner McMath.
Commissioner McMath explained that the Commission is charged with planning and zoning matters for the
C ity's future. College Station is a growing City and growth is coming to people of rural areas. The matter of
having two ingress and egress paints in developing neighborhoods has been a priority of the Commission for
safety reasons.
Commissioner Williams expressed concern regarding the existing roads and if there were plans to widen them
and install side walks. She also asked why we were planning existing neighborhoods in the ETJ rather than
planning roads in the undeveloped areas.
Transportation Planner Fogle stated that the roadways do not meet C ity standards but that there is no
intention to widen the road or install sidewalks. The proposed plan is to provide an additional ingress and
egress for emergency evacuation, school and public service uses, and connectivity by providing more than
one route to access different areas.
Commissioner McMath added that the proposed plan is a planning document. He stated that it is critical to
have some form of plan in place in order to estimate and modify over the gears as conditions change and
P&Z Minutes March 20, 2003 Page 6 of
development occurs. Some roadways on the plan may or may not come into play either in their current
existence or as shown to be in the future on the plan. It is just practical to have a plan of some kind that you
can work Frith. In closing, Commissioner McMath stated that in terms of the overall goal of the City, it is
paramount that a plan be in place.
Commissioner Shafer agreed that growth is occurring and that the Commission wants the best for the citizens
of College Station. He asked clarification regarding the direct route to the back of the Nantucket subdivision.
Mr. Fogle explained that the route is an alternative plan. He added that growth is going to happen with or
without the approval of the Thoroughfare Plan. He pointed out that it is difficult to handle traffic control with the
additional drives and that a direct route is safer than offset intersections. This would present problems that are
already experienced at Southwest Parkway and Glade.
Chairman Floyd, a strong proponent of providing for multiple ingress and ogress to neighborhoods, does not
support the proposed plan citing the preexisting conditions in these two established neighborhoods. He
proposed mooring some of the proposed through streets in order to protect the neighborhood integrity and
lifestyles of the residents.
Commissioner Trapani amended his motion to mare the offset entrance to Nantucket to the north or south and
to desolve the additional entrance proposed to Woodlake and to cancel out the additional entrance at Harpers
Fe rry.
Commissioner McMath seconded the amendment to the motion.
Mr. Fogle clarified for the Commission that TxDOT drives the interchange at the bypass area.
Chairman Floyd called the question. The motion to approve as amended by the Commission carried -1.
FOR : Floyd, Trapani, Williams, Shafer, and Hall.
AGAINST McMath.
12. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action to consider a Land Use Plan Amendment for
properties labeled Mixed-Use on the City's Land Use Plan.
Chairman Floyd moored this item forward on the agenda and heard prior to Agenda Item No. 6.
Lee Battle presented the staff report. He explained that the Mixed-Use study was initiated to analyze
opportunities for mined -use development in College Station and determine if any changes to the City's policies
or Land Use Plan are needed to help implement or encourage this development pattern. The study also
developed a definition.
The study identifies three opportunities for mined -use development that are likely to occur in the city:
• Historic Mixed -use - primarily describes the forthgate area.
• Single -use Conversions - the development or redesign of shopping centers and retail strip centers into
mined -use developments that accommodate pedestrians, integrate compatible uses and transition into
surrounding neighborhoods.
• Master Planned Developments - new development on larger undeveloped tracts of land. Not all Master
Planned Developments will be Mined -use, but they are all the best opportunity for mixed -use development
on undeveloped land.
Mr. Battle pointed out that it is net required to show a designation of any of the mixed -use development on the
Land Use Plan in order to be implemented. Mr. Battle stated that Staff recommends that the City have a policy
that allows for and encourages mixed -use development, but should net force it to occur in any specific location
through the Land Use Plan.
Additionally, Mr. Battle stated that the study recommends that a new land use category called Planned
Development be added to the Land Use Plan. This is to be used where larger areas of land may develop with
a mix, or collection of uses, but not necessarily a mined -use pattern. It emphasizes the need to master plan
the area to ensure appropriate placement of different uses.
P&Z Minutes March 20, 2003 Page 7 of
In closing, Mr. Battle stated that this approach provides for mixed -use development should a developer or the
market desire it without forcing it to occur where the market does not support it or where it may not be the only
desirable land use pattern.
Chairman Floyd opened the public hearing.
Fain McDougle, 4150 Shadowbrook Circle, asked questions of Staff regarding properties affected by the
proposed change and how R&D rezonings would be viewed by the Commission.
Development Services Director Templin explained that an evaluation of the existing and proposed zonings
could go before the Commission for a recommendation to the City Council. Chairman Floyd added that a
compatible use would be looked upon favorably and stated that the Commission's recommendation is not
absolutely bound by a map but rather by the state of evolution of the subject property.
Sherry Ellison, 2705 Brook gray Drive expressed concerns regarding the most intense uses in a mined -use
area.
Don Jones, 804 Berry Creek, expressed two concerns:
The area located adjacent to the north of F aintree was shown as single family. He requested that the office
designation shorn on the corner of F aintree Drive and Highway be extended into the single - family area to
the north. The existing floodway still provides a buffer between the commercial and office uses.
The intersection of Harvey Mitchell and Wellborn Road. He was concerned that on the northeast corner,
retail was only shorn on the frontage and not on the entire tract.
Chairman Floyd closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Shafer motioned to accept the Mixed -Use report and its concepts for College Station.
Commissioner Williams seconded the motion. The motion carried by a Grote of -o.
FOR Floyd, Shafer, Williams, Hall, McMath, and Trapani.
AGAINST: done.
Commissioner Shafer motioned to recommend that a new land use category called Planned Development be
added to the Land Use Plan. Commissioner Williams seconded the motion. The motioned carried -o.
FOR Floyd, Shafer, Williams, Hall, McMath, and Trapani.
AGAINST: None.
13. Discussion of future agenda items.
None.
14. Adjourn.
Commissioner Hall motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Williams seconded the motion. The motion carried -
o. The meeting adjourned.
APPROVED:
Chairman, Fick Floyd
ATTEST:
Staff Assistant, Susan Hazlett
P&Z Minutes March 2, 2003 Page 8 of