Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/06/1999 - Minutes - Planning & Zoning Commission11~INUTES Planning and Zoning Commission CITX OF COLLEGE STATIONS TEAS May 6, 1999 7:00 P.M. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Massey, Commissioners Garner, Parker, Kaiser, 1Zife, and Maloney. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner Mooney. STAFF' PRESENT: City Planner Kee, Development Coordinator Ruiz, Staff Assistant Charanza, Staff Planner Jimmerson, Assistant City Engineer Morgan, Graduate Engineer Tondre, Senior Planner McCully, Director of Development Services Callaway, Assistant City Attorney I~emcik9 Senior Planner Battle, and Transportation Planner Hard. COl1NCIi. LIAISON: Council Members Hazen and Silvia. AGENDA ITEM NO. l: Hear Visitors. • Benito Flores-Meathe, 901 Val Verde, approached the Commission and asked if he could be updated as to the status of the Historic Overlay. He was concerned with the overlay only affecting one side of Dexter and wanted Staff or the Commission to check into the prospect of allowing the overlay to cover both sides of Dexter. Chairman Massey asked staff to look into this issue and respond to Mr. r loresd Meatha 7'he following items were approved by common consent AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consent Agenda. AGENDA I'T'EM NO. 2.1: Approved minutes from the Workshop Meeting held on March 29, 1999, AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.2: Approved minutes from the Regular Meeting held on April 1, 1999., AGE'~TDA ITEM NO. 2.3; Approved minutes from th_ Special Meeting held on April 1 ~, 1999. AGEI`1DA ITEM NO. 2.4: Approved minutes from the Joint Commission and Parks Board Workshop meeting held on April 29, 1999. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.5: Approved a Resubdivision and Final Plat of approximately 43.2 acres divided into two M-1 Planned Industrial lots in the Business Center at College Station, Phase II, pan the southeast corner of Gateway and State Highway b. (98-233) • P&Z Minutes May 6, /999 ~a~~ ! v~'°x(J AGENDA__ITEM NO. 2.6: Approved a Final Plat of 1,75 acres for Alam Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, located on the northeast corner of Greens Prairie Road at State Highway 6. (99-209) AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.7: Approved a Final Plat of 11.286 acres -Alexandria Phase I, located adjacent to Barron Road just west of the Springbrook-Oakgrove Subdivision. (99-212) AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.8: Approved a Final Plat for O.C. Cooper Pla~~e, Reserve Tract A, 3,6 acres located on Holleman Drive immediately west of the Enclave Apartments. (99-213) AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.9: Approved a Final Plat for Edelweiss Estates Phase 15-8, 5. ( acres located southwest of Phase 15-A and northwest of Phase 12. The property is located off Catering Lane. (99- 215) AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.10: Approved a Final Plat for the Wheeler Subdivision, Phase II, located along the south side of University Drive and west of the Lincoln Avenue intersection, The final plat consists of a 2.4-acre Lot 1R and a 6.07-acre Lot 2. (99-217) AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.11: Approved a Final Plat for Holleman Village Addition, 17.074 acres located at 2001 Holleman Drive West, between FM 2818 and Jones-Butler Road. (99-218) AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Public hearing and consideration of a use only permit in a C~N Neighborhood Commercial district for aself--serve car wash on Lot 2., Block E#, Culpepper Plazao (99-711) • Senior Planner McCully presented the staff report and explained that the subject site is zoned C-N Neighborhood Commercial, which requires the Commission's approval. In order to approve the use and site plan of a C-N proposal, the Commission must find that the purpose of the district would be met. The honing Ordinance states the purpose of the C-N district as follows: "This district provides small commercial sites for residential convenience goods and service businesses. No use shall be allowed which would adversely affect the health, safety, welfare, or residential character of the neighborhood. The use shall be a low traffic generator and shall not create any noise, light, or odors abnormal to the neighborhood No outside storage or display of goods or materials shall be allowed " The applicant was proposing to construct aself--serve car wash on the site. The use will be located across the street from a shopping center, a vacant bank drive-thru, and a church facility. The site immediately abuts existing single family to the north. At a minimum, the applicant would be required to construct a 6' screening fence. The Commission may consider additional buffering along the common lot line, in order to further mitigate potential impacts. There may be some concern regarding potential noise and lighting impacts to the adjoining neighborhood. The applicant has stated that the equipment that would be installed is designed to minimize noise and that indirect lighting standards would be used. Staff recommended approval with the noise and lighting abatement as conditions. The Commissioners were concerned that the car wash would target more the surrounding neighborhood, which would defeat the C-N definition. Chairman Massey opened the public hearing. P&Z ~Lfdreutes May 6, 1999 Page ~ of ~0 Mr, Tres Watson, Coldwell Banker (representing the applicant), felt the use would benefit and target the surrounding neighborhood. He explained that this type of use would not generate an increase in • traffic for the area, although no studies were conducted. He explained that the site would be approximately six bays and a vacuum area. Bruce Crooker, 512 Brooks Avenue, felt that George Bush East should be the limit for commercial development. He said that there would be noise from the vacuums and loud music being played by the patrons of the facility. This type of development would add to litter and would encourage crime in tl~e neighborhood. Doc Burke, 502 W. Dexter, explained that he was a representative from the Historic Preservation Committee, and he felt that older neighborhoods needed to be protected and preserved, Benito Flores-Meath, 901 Val Verde, expressed concern for noise levels produced at car washes, and felt that this type of use would degrade the neighborhood. Chris Northcliffe, 407 Fairview, explained that he did not think this was aneighborhood-oriented use. Mr. Crooker told the Commission that a convenience store across the street was denied, and felt that if a convenience store was not a good use in a neighborhood than a car wash would not be either. Chairman Massey closed the public hearing. Commissioner Maloney moved to aeny the request. Commissioner Kaiser seconded the motion. • Comrrissioner Rife felt that most uses in the C-N district would generate some type of trai~c so traffic was not an issue for him, He said that his main concerns were that the business would be operated 24 hours per day. He explained that some type of commercial use would be developed in this location in the future. Commissioner Kaiser also said that traffic was not a major concern of hiss His main concerns were with uncontrollable noise. Commissioner Garner agreed that the noise was a major factor, Commissioner Maloney felt that there were other uses in the C-N district that would be better suited for this site. Chairman Massey called for the vote and the motion to deny the request passed 4-2; Commissioners Parker and Rife voted against the motion. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Public hearing and consideration of a rezoning request for 1105 and 1107 Wellborn Road located on the east side of Wellborn Road and south of the Wellborn Road/Holleman Drive intersection. (99-111) City Planner Kee presented the staff report. She explained that this request involves two lots totaling • approximately one-quarter acre in size. The lots front Wellborn Road and were subdivided sevec-al years ago. The lots sit just south and adjacent to existing C-1 General Commercial property developed as storage buildings. The Land LJse Plan shows the area for high-density single family development. 1'&ZtLftnute~ May 6, 1999 Page ~ oj10 She explained that the request is not in compliance with the land use plan, although it is not incompatible with some surrounding uses. The lots are part of an area that is surrounded by commercial and residential land uses. She said that before any additional commercial zoning is considered in this area, consolidation of larger properties should occur. This would enable better planning for development and access onto Wellborn Road. She explained that this would not guarantee that commercial zoning is the most appropriate. Since there is single family development on Southland, there needs to be some transition zoning between these homes and the commercial and industrial at the Holleman and Wellborn corner. Staff recommended denial of the request. Chairman Massey opened the public hearing. Ms. Lucille Young, applicant, explained that her intentions were to open a beauty shop at this location, She said that a tavern and movie theater used to be located at this site, years ago. She explained that she would either renovate the existing building or tear it down and rebuild. Mr. Benito Flores-Meath, 901 Val Verde, felt that R-1 Single Family may not be the best zoning for this location, He thought that a beauty salon would be a low intensity business. Mr. Tom Schwart, 706 Swiss Court, thought the beauty salon was a good use for the area. Chairman Massey closed the public hearing. Commissioner Parker asked staff what their thoughts would be for a zoning classification for the area. Ms. Kee said that she did agree that R-1 may not be the best classification, however, rezoning should od;cur in more of a comprehensive fashion. • Commissioner Maloney asked if staff would be able to support a C~l~l classification. Ms, Kee said that she would be more comfortable with C-N, but reminded the Commission that when any commercial zoning district is approved, a range of uses would be perrrutted, Commissioner Rife moved to recommend denial of the requeste Commissioner Kaiser seconded the motion. Commissioner Rife felt that this would be a form of "spot-zoning". Commissioner Maloney said that he thought this was a piecemeal approach to the area and would support C-N over C~ 1. Commissioner Parker felt the Commission needed to help the applicant and let her know what the Commission wG•~tu support. He thought it was important for the applicant to be able to rievelop her business in an area she was familiar with. The Commissioners agreed. that they could support a C~N classification. Assistant City Attorney Ielemcik informed the Commission that they could recommend a more restrictive zoning classification without sending the applicant through the process againo • Chairman Massey called for the vote to recommend denial of the request to rezone the property to C-l . The motion passed 6-0. P~c,~~farau~es May 6, 1999 Pale 4 of 10 Commissioner Parker made a new motion to recommend approval of the request with a C-N zoning classification. Commissioner Garner seconded the motion, which passed 4-2; Commissioners Kaiser • and Rife voted against the motion, AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Puhlic hearing and consideration of a rezoning request for approximately 7.2 acres located near the Holleman and Welsh intersection and being the proposed Lot 2, Block 1 of the Holleman/Welsh Addition. (99-1.12) Senior Planner McCully presented the staff report and explained that the applicant is preparing the subject property for development as low-density multi-family. The intended use is for either duplex, four-plex, or a mix of these two building types on individual lots. The property would be required to be platted before building permits can be issued. The requested zoning district would act as a step down transition zone between the commercial corner and the existing single family developments. R-4 zoning could be considered compatible with single family if it is oriented away from the single family and through the use of screening. If four-plexes are built on the subject property, the Zoning Ordinance would require a 6' screening fence between them and the existing single farruly. However, if duplexes are built, no screen fence would be required unless the rezoning includes such a condition, The height restriction (35') in the R-4 is the same as in the R-1 and R-lA zoning districts. Staff recommended approval with the condition that a screening fence is installed between the subject property and the single-family areas regardless of the housing type chosen and with the condition that the buildings are oriented away from the existing homes. Chairman Massey opened the public hearing. • Tom Schwart, 706 Swiss Court, said that his home backs up to this site. He felt that changing to R-4 would degrade the area. He said it was difficult now to develop a neighborhood atmosphere because most of the property is rental. The commercial developments were not offensive to the area. This type of development would take away from community spirit. He had strong feelings that this development would substantially increase traffic on an already high volume street (Holleman). NIr. Blake Cathey, developer for the property, explained that R-1 was not chosen for this tract of land because of the odd shape of the property. The most effective plan for the property was to develop around 30 dwelling units. The plan would enhance and benefit the area. He said that he would not have any problems with the screening recommendations as stated by staff. Norma Miller, 504 Guernsy, explained that there was no need for additional multi-family development within the historic areas of College Station. This type of development would add to traffic problems already present on Holleman. She had concern witri parking for the development. MacHayden Dillard, Century 21, explained that the property had been listed for several years. The property shape elirrunates R-1 development. He also felt that R-1 would not be suitable because the property backs up to C-1 development. Lynell VVozencraft, 1100 Dexter South, said that she is the owner of the property. She explained that this piece of property had been in her family for many years. She was having a difficult time selling it because of the odd shape. She said that she understood where the opposition was coming from but felt that she should not be held up trying to sell and develop it. ~&Z Minutes May 6, 1999 Page S of ! 0 Ms. Hattie Crow, 101 L Dexter, had strong concerns for the increased traffic along Holleman, She felt this type of development would only increase the problems. • Ms, Melanie Adams, 706 Swiss Court, said that her property would be directly affected. by this development. There would be added traffic and noise for the surrounding neighborhoods, She felt this would drive families away from the area because of safety issues, Mr, Jerry Cooper, 602 Bell, said his concern was that the development plans showed narrow streets and inadequate parking. Mr. Tim Wozencraft, 1100 Dexter, said that he understood the concerns expressed by the citizens, but felt that since the majority of the area is rental property this development would not cause more problems. He felt the traffic would only increase by approximately 5 percent because most of the traffic generated already exists as through traffic. The Commission asked staff to comment on the increased traffic. Transportation Planner Hard said that the 5% estimate was a fair number and felt that this development would not generate excessive traffic, Ms. June Cooper, 900 Val Verde, thought the plans shown were good, but felt this location may not be the best suited for the development. Mr, Benito Flores-Meath, 901 Val Verde, urged the Commission to preserve neighborhood integrity. He also was concerned with increased traffic and high speeds. • Mr, George Stuart, 2406 Burton Drive, explained that he owned the property at 1115 Welsh (Texas Commission for the Blind Office). He said that he was speaking on behalf of the state office and they expressed their desire to leave the zoning as it is at R-1. He said that one of their reasons for locating this office at their current location was because of the low traffic volumes as opposed to their former site at a highly congested area in another part of College Station. Mr. Dock Burke, Historic Preservation Committee, expressed his concern for preserving the historic areas of College Station. Chris Northcliff, 407 Fairview, expressed similar concerns with traffic volumes, neighborhood preservation and safety. The Commission asked if the applicant or owner considered a conditional use for the property. The owner explained that they were not familiar with conditional uses. Chairman Massey closed the public hearing. Commissioner Rife moved to recommend denial without prejudice and the recommendation to the applicant to consider a PDD-H (Planned Development District -Housing) for this property., Commissioner Kaiser seconded the motion, which passed (4-1-1); Commissioner Garner abstained from the item and Commissioner Parker voted against the motion. The Commissioners suggested that the applicant work with the neighborhood and Historic Preservation Committee to come up with a plan that would satisfy everyone involved. P&Z ~l~finutes May 6, 1999 Page 6 of 10 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Public hearing and consideration of a rezoning request for approximately 7.2 acres located approximately 290 feet west of FM 2818, south of F&B Road • from R-1 Single Family to C-I General Commercial. (99-105) Assistant City Engineer Morgan presented the staff report. She explained that this rezoning was returned to the Conunission for consideration as a C-1 General Commercial zone. In March the Commission considered a request for C-2 Cormercial Industrial. The Commission recommended denial of the C-2 request without prejudice. The City Council denied the C-2 request and returned the item to the Commission for consideration of C-1 zoning. The Council understood the utility issues and alternatives for services. Access to F&B Road was identified as a concern. The applicant is requesting the rezoning of the subject property for future development to C-1. C-1 allows a broad range of uses including retail, restaurants, theaters, nightclubs, and auto dealerships. It does not include some of the more intense industrial uses such as lumberyards and machine shops, allowed in the earlier C-2 request. The City's land use plan shows the area as Retail Regional, which would include such development as retail centers, service conurlercial and restaurants. The request is in compliance with the City's Land Use Plan. There is an existing single-family residence immediately to the west of this property, which could pose potential land use and buffering issues. Staff recommended approval of the request for C- with the conditions that access be taken from FM2818 or that F&B Road be improved from the western property line of the subject tract to FM2818, providing adequate capacity for the development proposed. Utility concerns would have to be addressed at the time of development through providing adequate facilities and/or obtaining variances before permits can be issued. Chairman Massey opened the public hearing. • Mr. Jim Jett, 1206 King Arthur Circle, the applicant, explained that no use is proposed at this time. FIe said that he was not fond of the way staff worded the recommendation with the access condition, Ms. Patricia Jones, said that she was in support of the request. Ms. Dorothy Sens, 3905 F&B Road, said that she was concerned with the unknown of what would be developed. She has a strong desire to protect her interests and home. She had concerns with streets and access to the development, Mr. John Isgitt, 3909 F&B Road, had similar concerns regarding the unknown and access to the site.. Chairman Massey closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kaiser moved to recommend approval of the C-1 with star conditions as stated in the staff report. Commissioner Rife seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (6-0). • P&Z Minutes May 6, 1999 Page 7 of 10 Mr. Benito Flores-Meath, 901 Val Verde, said that he was opposed to the C-2 classification but could support the C-1 zoning. AGENDA ITEIl7 NO. 7: Public hearing and consideration of a rezoning request for approximately 7.2 acres located along the west side of State Highway 6, approximately 700' south of Graham Road, from R-6 Apartments/High Density to C-1 General Commercial. • Senior Planner McCully presented the staff report. She explained that the City Council approved this rezoning on March 25, 1999 with three conditions: 1. That there be a vegetative buffer that meets p&D requirements on the proposed ~'-1 property along the western boundary. 2. That the overall heights of the buildings in the C-1 development not exceed 35', 3. That the zoning not be effective until an east-west minor collector is either installed or guaranteed, She explained that the request was returning to the Commission and Council because the applicant would like to have condition number 3 removed. °I'he Commission approved the Master Plan for the parent tract on March 18, 1999. The Master Plan shows a future collector road that would extend off of Highway 6, through the subject property and through a future single family neighborhood, The collector is shown on the Master Plan to eventually connect with the future Longrrure extension. The collector satisfies the intent of the condition in that it provides a location for commercial development that is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. However, the Master Plan does not guarantee that the road will be installed. If the proposed collector is not installed, then the request for commercial zoning on this subject property would not be in compliance with the City's criteria for locating commercial development at intersections of major roadways at the periphery of residential areas. Staff recommended denial of the request so that all three conditions of the rezoning to C~ 1 • remain as they were approved in March of this year. Chairman Massey opened the public hearing. Mr. Alton Ofczarzak, applicant, explained that he wanted the Commission to reconsider the conditions that were placed on this rezoning in early March. He said that he has every intention to build to the east-west minor collector (condition number 3), but in phases. NU. Benito Flores-Meath, 901 Val Verde, said that he agreed with staff to approve the request with the conditions. He was concerned that oversized participation could be considered for the building of the street. He said that at the March 4`~ meeting, he asked staff if oversized participation could be a possibility and staff said no, but now it is an option. Ms. McCully explained that oversize participation could be requested for Longmire because it would serve a larger area. The minor collector would not be a good candidate for oversize participation. For consideration of oversize participation funds, the applicant would need to comple~c an impact study to show his demands with Longrrure, in comparison to the larger or greater need. This would determine the amount of fund participation (if approved). Staff is not sure if the applicant would even request the participation. Mr. Nuke Hester, Engineer for the Project, reiterated that the applicant would be willing to build the minor collector, but needed to do it in phases. He wanted to know why the street needed to be built through the entire subdivision initially and not through phases. Ms. McCully explained that Staff wants assurance that the street would be built. The condition was not placed on the request to show lack of trust, but felt the City needed to take conservative measures to P&ZLl~finutes May 6, 1999 Page 8 of 10 protect the City. She said that staff was also concerned with the probability of "spot-zoning", because the development would not be in compliance with location criteria as stated in the Comprehensive Plan, The Commissioners questioned the possibility of "guarantee" for the street. Mr. Hester responded that it would cost $150,000 to guarantee the street. Chairman Massey closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kaiser moved to recommend denial of the request. Commissioner Rife seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (6-0). Commissioner Kaiser felt that when this request was considered in March, the applicant expressed the desire to have the property rezoned so the street would be built. He said that the City's restrictions were to assure that the City would be protected and standards would be met. AGENDA ITEM NO. 8: Presentation on neighborhood planning by students from the Eisenhower Leadership Development Group. This item was presented after the consent agenda was approved. Senior Planner Battle explained that Staff had been working on a new neighborhood services and planning program which would provide a framework for the City and neighborhoods to work together to address certain issues. A Neighborhood Task Force was created. This task force is a group of citizens working to develop goals and make recommendations about the services the Neighborhood • Planning Program could offer. He introduced the Eisenhower Leadership Development Group from Texas ABzM University. He explained that this group's project for the semester was to research neighborhood planning programs and to provide recommendations on the development of a program in College Station. The group presented the report to the Commission and presented their recommendations and findings. AGENDA ITEM NO. 9: Consideration of minutes from the Workshop Meeting held on April ~2, 1999 and discussion of Strategic Issues. Commissioner Rife moved to approve the minutes with one clerical change. Commissioner Garner seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (6-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 10: Discussion of future agenda items. Commissioner Rife asked staff if they would consider adding an item to a future agenda regarding the Woif Pen Creek Development ordinance amendment excluding big box retail and multi family development. AGENDA ITEM NO. 11: Farewell comments from outgoing Planning and Zoning Commissioners. P&Z iLfinutes May 6, 1999 Page 9 ®f 10 Chairman Massey said that replacements for the Commission would be made at either the May 13, 1.999 City Council Meeting or the May 27, 1999 meeting, Chairman Massey and Commissioners Garner and Maloney said their good-byes. The remaining Commissioners wished them well in their terms on the City Council. AGENDA ITEM NO. 12: Adjourn. Commissioner Gamer moved to adjourn the meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Commissioner Maloney seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (6-Cl), ATTEST: 1 r-- StaffAssistant, Debra anza • • ~c~Z ~~nutes May 6, 1999 F~ag~ ~ (7 aj x U Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting 5 - 6 ' 9 Q Agenda Item No. R9 - ! 1 qq -t 12. ILVCC/ ~dA Name ~ t^ r ~ s (~ o,. ~ ~,1 ~r~~E ~ Address ~{O'T 'GA;.,~.~~e.w 96-~~t' O-~~+e~ ~~'S 30~ Qvl-~,s~ 78-88 If speaking for an organization, o,a,,ed 1Z 06 ~~~ 8 8 - 96 3 1 Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak: lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA .COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. w~,.~ r„ ; ~ 1 ~ Y w, s e ~• e ra f -k- ct~~ bua~n lea ~r~~~ Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~~~ Agenda Item No. Name ~~ ~~ ~+/G ~- Address "~~~'~~~ Gda If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to ~~ ~OaS i ~I~ rO~ ~/ ~ N lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are .cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~~" ~ .R 1 Agenda Item No. 1 Name J °~, ^ -~- 5 ~ Address ~~9 F & 3 If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to s eak: Q~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA .COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~~ ~ `~ `~ Agenda Item No. ~_ Name 4 ~' S ~~--~ S~ ~Z Address I Q ~'-~ ~c~ rln a ~' -~ ~.'~' ~ ~ If speaking for an organization, N me of organi ation: ~` ~ ` :er's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak: _~ ( -" ti iJ ~-~- ~-+P yJt e t/c~` 1. cal ~..~ ce. `~ lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For ersons P who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~~ ~~ - ~~Cj Agenda Item No. Name ~ ;~1 ,,~_.~ Address I~~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~~ ..5. If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: 's~off~ial capacity: ,~ ~/ J ~ F~ Subject on which person wishes to speak: ease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting . Agenda Item No. Name %' =~_~-~ ~ ~ ~~ ; ;:t ~ s.,z y_ e7 Address `-~ ~" ~.~ ,,' ~ ~~_ ,~/~~' :-r. If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to ~- , ~- r ~~ ~ try ~' ~ -* , ~ . ~- lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are ognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA .COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting - ? ~ ~. ....Agenda Item No. "-~-~ ~ Name ~; .~ ~_,,~..~, ..~t!-~,,~~ ,. . Address ~i'~/-~' - ~~• If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official cra~pacity: _ 7~ g 1 r 'V Subject on which person wishes to spea ~~ lease remerlber to step to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form . (For persons who wish to address the Commission) ~~ Date of Meeting ~-0 ~ ~q~°~ Agenda Item No. 5 Name ~'~ E.-~ czr~ ~ ~ ~~~~' r~ ~ Address ' 1GC~ 5~~=~5`'~ If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: ect on ,wishes to speak: lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are ognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ' Agenda Item No. Name j~ Address /,~/a ~~v~ If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: ~.~.-s-r~~c-., Subject on which person wishes to speak: ' .~ ~" lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration rm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting --~ Agenda Item No. ~ ~- ' l Name c/~~? ~ ~ e L Address ~-% If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: on which pe~,son wishes to speak: lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting S ' ~V y Agenda Item No. ~ Name ~ 11~ ~ ~ Z.~,U G k- ~1(~7 Address lI o v ~De~7-~ l;S If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak: . lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA .COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting 5~~ Z'~i Agenda Item No. Name ~~~-~~~~ ~~1~ r~ Address l3s~s w 3a C~~~y~ ~ ,~ ~o~ ~x ~~ ~~ If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: l~~ Eta r ~ o ~ S"~1~~ r ~- l~v y ~ ~ ~o ~" ~ ~ L ABC res c~nr ~c%Clc,,,i,a,v GcJe,/c ~ ect on which person wishes to speak: e.v c lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. • Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) 6 Date of Meeting Agenda Item No. ~ ~- ~. Name Address d If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: •- - ease remember to tep to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA .COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Subject on which person wishes to speak: Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~ ~ [v Agenda Item No. Name ~ ~ 1/ ~ ~ 4 ~ Address D If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on whi erson wishes to lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration orm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form . (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting Agenda Item No ~I ~ ; ~, y ~+ 5~ ~ Name l~ c ~.: , ~~; ~~<< , i:-~ 3 - /`' ~~ ~ ~)`? l Address ~1 G ( (/f~'C.- tf` ~ ~° If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak: lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are cognized by the chair, hand your completed registration rm to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. ~lannin~ ~' ZoninB Commission Guest ~,egister Date j~1 '`~/' /~/ ~~,_ ~~/ // ~~ ~-f-~' ~ - ~ . ~_._.. 2. ~~ ~' ~--- ~ - ,~ _ j _ .~ ~ ~,.~ ~fl ~,_~ . ~~~,~ S5 ~~y~~-z~,~ 3. '7 !7 6. ~^, S ~r,ns~-~ ~. 9. 10. • 11. 12. 13, 14. IS, 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. ,1 -i 24. 2S. ~1 cfcfress /f ~~~i ~,~,~1w~,~~ ~~ ~i` 1 ,l ~~^^ ! ~ ~ __ -®~ ~;~,~:~ ~it ~'C _Svd ~ i .-,_.~ ~ ~ } (. F~ . ~,~ i ~,f i._-- ~r e ~~~~~ ~' ~ ~ ~~~- ~G~ ti ~-~ ~C. N ii ~ ~ ~ '~~. -~ 1 ~ ?~'~ i. /f ~ /