The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/06/1995 - Minutes - Planning & Zoning CommissionI• MINUTES Planning & Zoning Commission CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Apri16, 1995 7:00 P.M. • COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Hawthorne and Commissioners Lane, Smith, Gribou, Hall, Garner, and Lightfoot. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Assistant Director of Economic and Development Services Callaway, City Planner Kee, Senior Planner Kuenzel, Planning Technician Thomas, Transportation Planner Hard, Assistant City Engineer Morgan, Project Engineer McCully and Development Coordinator Volk. (Council Liaison Lynn McIlhaney and Bill Fox were in the audience.) AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: The Consent Agenda consists of non-controversial or "housekeeping" items required by law. Items may be removed from the Consent Agenda by any citizen, City staff member, or Commissioner by making such a request prior to a motion and vote on the Consent Agenda. (1.1) Approval of minutes from the meeting of March 16, 1995. (1.2) Consideration of a preliminary and final E.T.J. plat for the Trinity Gardens Addition (previously reviewed under the name of Bird Pond Addition). (95-302 & 95-202) (1.3) Consideration of a final plat for the Camelot Section Three replat of lots 34, 35 and 36 of block 2. (95-201) (1.4) Consideration of a final plat for the Shenandoah Phase II Subdivision. (95-211) Chairman Hawthorne informed the Commission that consent agenda item 1.3 was withdrawn prior to the meeting at the request of the applicant. Consent agenda items 1.1, 1.2 and 1.4 were approved by common consent. • P & ZMinutes April 6, 1995 Page 1 of 7 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Public hearing to consider a rezoning request for approximately 69.8 acres generally located on the southeast corner of Sebesta Road and • State Highway 6 East Bypass Frontage Road from A-O Agricultural Open and R-1 Single Family Residential to C-1 General Commercial, A-P Administrative Professional and R-1 Single Family Residential. (95-106) City Planner Kee presented the staff report and recommended approval of the rezoning request with the following conditions: (1) To insure that the existing and proposed single family neighborhoods are protected, the C-1 zoning should be conditioned upon final platting of the single family area. The C-1 zoning will not be effective until the R-1 development has final plats approved and filed for record. (2) There should be an additional landscape reserve adjacent to the proposed R-1 to increase the proposed buffer strip shown on the proposed R-1 zoning. The landscape reserve should be developed prior to any development on the C-1 or A-P tracts and should include berms, trees and other plantings as well as a brick wall along the common boundary. (3) Along the remainder of the common boundary between the C-1 and R-1, the landscape reserve area should be extended to include the creek. If leaving the creek in its natural condition is preferable, staff would recommend that be done and be contained within the landscape reserve area. If the natural condition is not preferable, staff would recommend that it be improved and a landscape reserve platted and developed as in item two above. This reserve should be in place prior to any commercial or A-P development. • (4) A landscape reserve should be provided adjacent to the existing Woodcreek development along the common boundary of the proposed A-P. This should consist of screen fencing (which is required by ordinance) but should also consist of additional vegetation along the common property lines. This should be installed prior to any development on the commercial or A-P tracts. (5) Access should be denied to Sebesta for the commercial tracts. In the event that the corner is platted and developed as a neighborhood convenience facility (i.e.; gas station, convenience store, cleaners, etc.) access should be considered to Sebesta. This will allow the convenience goods to be accessible to the surrounding neighborhoods. (6) The entrance drive for the R-1 should be a boulevard section as shown to lessen the impact of a single access subdivision. However, as the remainder of the property to the east develops, particularly if it is residentially zoned, there should be two access points on Sebesta to avoid a single access subdivision. Secondary access is most important for efficient public and emergency service, as well as for convenient traffic circulation. (7) The Project Review Committee, in reviewing site plans for the commercial and A- Ptracts should use its discretion within the terms allowed by the Zoning ordinance to lessen as much as possible any negative impact of these developments on surrounding residential land uses. • City Planner Kee informed the Commission that the proposed rezoning request includes property that was discussed twice in 1994 before the Commission and Council. The first request (June and July, 1994) involved 15 acres at the southeast corner of Sebesta and State Highway 6 stretching P & Z Minutes April 6, 1995 Page 2 of 7 south along the Frontage Road. The request was for C-1 General Commercial. The Commission and staff recommended approval to Council conditioned upon the applicant submitting a larger rezoning request addressing buffering and step-down zoning issues. Council denied the request because of a large amount of opposition from nearby neighborhoods and because there was no • larger zoning plan. This denial was made without prejudice and the applicant came back with another request in September, 1994. This request included 69 acres and was for a combination of commercial, townhome and multi-family zones. The Commission recommended denial of the request. The Development Policies Council subcommittee met three times to discuss the case (once with the developer and once with representatives of the affected subdivisions and once with staff). The Council denied the request on September 22, 1994. City Planner Kee stated that originally staff supported the proposed commercial zonings. That was because the proposal included step down zonings to buffer the low density residential areas. This request does not include this step down approach and places the R-1 zoning adjacent to the C-1 zoning. Staff is able to recommend approval of this only with the establishment of buffer areas or landscape reserves. The establishment of these buffers would constitute a change of conditions in the area that would be a basis for a zoning change. City Planner Kee stated that the current Land Use Plan reflects the western portion of this area for office/commercial uses and the eastern portion for low density residential uses. The 2818 Extension Study, adopted in 1992, provided for additional office/commercial uses in the area across the Bypass; that area had previously been shown for low density residential uses. This substantial change in the Plan in the vicinity of the subject tract constitutes a change in conditions that justifies a use other than the office/commercial shown on the western portion of the area under consideration. The proposed single family and A-P portions of the request comply with the Land Use Plan as currently shown. Approximately 58 surrounding property owners and concerned citizens were notified of the rezoning request with several inquiries. Transportation Planner Hard approached the Commission to further explain traffic issues in the area with and without the proposed rezoning. Using standard ITE (Institute of Traffic Engineers) • trip generation numbers and reasonable assumptions of what could develop locally on this site, staff can estimate the traffic that would be generated at full build-out under various scenarios. If the entire 69 acres were to develop as residential, (this excludes the Ledbetter tract which is not under consideration), it would generate approximately 2800 vehicles per day. This traffic would be dispersed across both Sebesta and the Frontage Road. Residential development would likely increase the cut-through traffic that has been a problem in the Emerald Forest Subdivision as a result of the conversion of the Frontage Roads to one way. By comparison, if the entire 69 acres develops as proposed, it would generate approximately 20,400 vehicles per day. The net effect on surrounding residential areas would be about the same if access to Sebesta is denied from the commercial tracts. If the Ledbetter tract develops residentially (staff would not support nor does the existing Land Use Plan, any other uses other than residential on this property) it will add an estimated 3900 vehicles per day to Sebesta Road. Sebesta Road and the Frontage Road are both designed to handle these increases and still maintain an acceptable level of service. Chairman Hawthorne opened the public hearing. Applicant Dan Bensimon of Myrad Realty approached the commission and offered to answer any questions pertaining to the proposed rezoning request. He stated that he agreed with the recommendations by staff and that the proposed commercial and single family developments could work in that location with adequate buffers. Mr. Bensimon explained that the proposed commercial property will probably not develop as single family primarily because there is not a demand for those lots. There are empty lots that back up to the Frontage Road of State Highway 6 in the Springbrook Subdivision that they have not been able to sell even below cost. . The following surrounding property owners spoke in opposition to the rezoning request: Mike Caudel, Chairman for the Emerald Forest Community Improvement Association P & Z Minz~tes April 6, 1995 Page 3 of 7 Stacy Gunnels, President of Foxfire Homeowners Association (HOA) and Member of the East Bypass Homeowners Coalition (EBPHOC) • Ray Martyn, President of Raintree HOA and Member of EBPHOC Jennifer Salter, Resident of Emerald Forest Subdivision Mary Ann Murray, President of Windwood HOA and Member of EBPHOC Sherry Ellison, 2705 Brookway in Windwood Subdivision Bob Hanson, 2101 Fairfax in Foxfire Subdivision Joe Bruegging, Resident of Foxfire Subdivision George Boyett, 9300 Lakeside Court in Woodcreek Subdivision Colonel R. E. Wilson, 9245 Brookwater in Woodcreek Subdivision Patsy Deere, 1500 Frost in Foxfire Subdivision Peter Dacin Gene Clark, President of Stonebridge HOA and Member of EBPHOC David Giedroc, 9229 Brookwater in Woodcreek Subdivision Dick Crooks, 2517 Fitzgerald in Foxfire Subdivision The surrounding property owners expressed the following concerns in opposition to the request: (1) Increased traffic congestion in the area including the surrounding subdivisions. More traffic studies should be conducted to show the impact of the proposed development on the existing subdivisions including Driftwood in Emerald Forest. (2) The proposed single family development is acceptable and encouraged in that area; however, the proposed commercial zoning is not appropriate at that location. (3) Currently, the surrounding area is a green belt entry way into the City of College Station. This entry way would be destroyed with commercial development along the • east side of the East Bypass. An overlay district should be created to preserve this green belt and an attractive entry way to the city. (4) The property values of the surrounding neighborhoods will decrease with the proposed commercial development. (5) The rezoning of the subject property should delayed until such time that the revised Master Land Use Plan is available that helps with the overall traffic and drainage issues as well as land use. The City Council made this decision at the last public hearing; however, the applicant has decided to pursue the rezoning further. (6) The existing Land Use Plan shows low density residential development along most of the property on the east side of the East Bypass. This single family development should continue and be encouraged on the subject property. (8) Noise and lighting from the commercial development is also a concern. The proposed 25' buffer will not screen these two elements. (9) The City Council directed staff at the last public hearing to meet with the surrounding homeowners associations and go over any new proposals before they were considered by the Commission and Council. Staff did not contact the surrounding associations to schedule this presentation. (10) The creek that flows behind the homes along Brookwater is a natural wetlands area with various wild life and many 100 year old post oak trees. Replacing this natural • setting with a landscape buffer is not acceptable. Chairman Hawthorne closed the public hearing. P & Z Minutes April 6, 1995 Page 4 of 7 Commissioner Hall moved to recommend denial of the rezoning request of approximately 69.8 acres generally located on the southeast corner of Sebesta Road and State Highway 6 East Bypass Frontage Road from A-O Agricultural Open and R-1 Single Family Residential to C-1 General • Commercial, A-P Administrative Professional and R-1 Single Family Residential. Commissioner Gribou seconded the motion. Commissioner Hall stated that he would prefer to see the recommendations by the consultants on the Comprehensive Plan to see what the long term plans are for the subject area. However, if the consultants recommend commercial development at this location then the Commission and Council may approve a similar rezoning request. Commissioner Hall stated that a more detailed, long range plan should be established for the area prior to development. Chairman Hawthorne explained that he was in favor of the first rezoning request on the subject property. He stated that he will vote to recommend denial of the proposed rezoning request primarily because it appears that the situation is getting worse and more commercial zoning is being added to the plan. It is unlikely that such an intense development as Target or HEB will develop at this location primarily due to accessibility. However, the Commission needs further direction from City Council on the long range plans for this area and hopefully those issues will be resolved with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Lightfoot stated that he is not ready to vote on the proposed rezoning request. He requested that someone representing the proposed C-1 property present more information about the future development of the C-1 property. Bill Atkinson, one of the owners of the subject property stated that at this point, no specific commercial uses or plans have been established. The property was purchased in 1979 and at that time, commercial development was contemplated. The motion to recommend denial of the rezoning request passed unopposed (7 - 0). • AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Public hearing to consider a rezoning request for lot 3 of the Courtyard Apartments Subdivision, First State Bank located at 701 Harvey Road, from A- PAdministrative Professional to C-3 Planned Commercial. (95-107) Staff Planner Kuenzel presented the staff report and recommended approval of the proposed rezoning request. The purpose of this request is a desire on the part of the applicant to be allowed additional height and 25 square feet additional area on the signage for the property. The existing zoning restricts signs to 100 square feet and the height to 10' with a 10' setback from the property line. The requested C-3 would allow 125 square feet and a height of roughly half the distance from the sign edge to the street curb. This property as well as the existing C-3 to the south were zoned A-P in 1982 when the lots were still vacant. In 1985, the lot to the west was rezoned to C-N to allow for automobile servicing uses. A service station and auto repair shop were built on that site as a result of that rezoning. In 1987, a rezoning for the same lot to the west was approved to allow for higher and larger signage for the businesses. This applicant wishes to be allowed the same visibility as his neighbors to the west. The difference between A-P and C-3 is that some retail usage is allowed and C-3 is considered more intense than the A-P. However, both districts are considered "light commercial" and the difference is minimal from a traffic viewpoint. A-P uses tend to have more restrictive characteristics in that their need for advertising is not as great as other commercial district uses. However, the history of the zoning and eventual lessening of sign restrictions of the property to the west would justify this zoning change. The Land Use Plan shows this area and the surrounding area to the north as high density residential. However, the entire area fronting on Harvey Road between Texas and Highway 6 has received continued pressure for commercial zoning. Approximately six surrounding property owners were notified of the rezoning request with no response. • Chairman Hawthorne opened the public hearing. P & ZMimites April 6, 1995 Page S of 7 Switzer Deason, Chairman of the First State Bank, approached the Commission and explained that they are the only banking facility along Harvey Road. The existing building is hidden to • traffic along Harvey Road and sits approximately 80' from the roadway. Chairman Hawthorne closed the public hearing. Commissioner Lightfoot moved to recommend approval of the rezoning request for lot 3 of the Courtyard Apartments Subdivision, First State Bank located at 701 Harvey Road, from A-P Administrative Professional to C-3 Planned Commercial. Commissioner Gribou seconded the motion which passed unopposed (7 - 0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Consideration of a preliminary E.T.J. plat for the German Acres Subdivision. (95-305) Asst. City Engineer Morgan presented the staff report and recommended approval of the proposed preliminary plat with the condition that the lot line be removed between lots D and E. Both lots are owned by the same person and should not cause a problem. The removal of this lot line will prohibit lot E from being virtually "land locked". A Presubmission Conference was held on March 1, 1995 that recommended approval of the preliminary plat with the condition that additional property be included in the plat to reflect the property as it existed in 1970 and has since been subdivided. This additional property has been added to the plat and the County Commissioner's Court approved the plat on February 27, 1995. Commissioner Gribou moved to recommend approval of the preliminary E.T.J. plat for the German Acres Subdivision with staff recommendations. Commissioner Lightfoot seconded the motion which passed unopposed (7 - 0). • AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Consideration of a variance request to Driveway Ordinance No. 1961, to allow backing maneuvers into the public street right-of--way for Our Savior's Lutheran Church located at 315 Tauber Street. (95-801) Transportation Planner Hard presented the staff report and recommended denial of the proposed driveway ordinance variance request for the following reasons: (1) Safety. The backing maneuver across the bike lane and out into the street would be detrimental and unsafe for traffic operations on this street. The conflict between the head-in spaces and the bike lane is of greatest concern. (2) Consistency/Fairness. Previous requests from two businesses to retain their head- in parking has already been denied. Both lost a greater percentage of their total parking than will the church. (3) Setting a Precedent. If this variance is approved, it sets a precedent for similar appeals that could come before the Commission for head-in parking on College Main. (4) Previous Council Action. The City Council has already directed staff to remove the Church's seven existing head-in spaces along College Main. The approve twelve new head-in parking spaces in this same location would be contrary to their prior direction. Transportation Planner Hard stated that the design plan for the College Main Improvement Project calls for the removal of all on-street and head-in parking to safely allow for the installation • of bike lanes from Church Street north to the city limit line. The current head-in parking operationally acts as an extra wide curb cut (140' in length) which creates one long point of P & Z Minutes April 6, 1995 Page 6 of 7 conflict along the street. Of greatest concern is the unsafe condition created by vehicles backing out across the bike lane and on to the street. The consulting traffic engineer for the project • recommended installing bike lanes due to the high volume of bike traffic on College Main. His study found over 800 bikes a day using this street. This number represents one bike per every 3.5 vehicles on College Main. The issue of head-in parking on College Main has already been addressed by Council. In January 1994, Council accepted the consultant's recommendation and directed staff to remove all head-in parking and install bike lanes from Church Street north to the city limit line. The College Main project will remove all 7 of the Church's existing head-in parking spaces on College Main. This accounts for about 10 percent of their total parking. They currently have 72 total spaces which includes the 7 spaces on College Main along with 22 spaces on Cross Street, 26 spaces on Tauber Street, and 17 spaces on-site. Applicant John Balsienz approached the Commission and stated that several members of the congregation are concerned with the loss of the seven parking spaces along College Main. The church was hoping to redesign those spaces so that they could still be in the same location and be head-in parking instead of angled parking. Commissioner Hall moved to deny the proposed driveway variance request for the Our Saviors Lutheran Church at 315 Tauber Street. Commissioner Garner seconded the motion which passed unopposed (7 - 0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Other business. There was no other business. r AGENDA ITEM NO. 7: Adjourn. Commissioner Gribou moved to adjourn the meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Commissioner Lightfoot seconded the motion which passed unopposed (7 - 0). ~z~-~~~-.~~ Kyle Hawthorne ATTES Plannin Technician, Natalie Thomas • P & Z Minutes April 6, 1995 Page 7 of 7 • Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~=' ~'~ C Agenda Item No. , -'. Name ''l~,,~, ~ - !y` ~~ E' ~ ~U <r.~ Address ~' ?~:-Z !~. ',',r~(G~ ~~a~ ~i'i~ ~~%J If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: -- /~ s s ~~~j!/~ d +Z ~( lf/ ~~?i~,,~~c~ ~l ~ d sad' ~ f~5 Speaker's official capacity: ~i"rS t c~e ~~`- Subject on which person wishes to speak: ~- "'J lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) ~' ;-~ - Date of Meeting ~~ ~-% 1 •~ Agenda Item No. ~ - Name ca~_~~r~,n ~t~~-~~~~ Address ~ t> S ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~- -_, ~ ~ ,._ ~ _f If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak: please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. • Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting Agenda Item No. `; Name ~„~f' ~~ % ;~-', 1 :-' i; _ ,, i , Address ~ '' ~ ~' If speaking for an organization, Na;ne of organization _~~ /r .~= ,,~ ~ .~r. ~ i~ i f ~~ Speaker's o f7cial capacity: ~~ Subject on which person wishes to speak: ,, lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~-~ ` %~5 Agenda Item No..;~ Name ti:S'j~~~ ~,~ ~ c~ ~ »~~s- Address / ~ ~ ~' «~ z If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: ~te%r'f' ~S /7`S"S ~ e' Speaker's official capacity: '~ f _ ~- ~~ r_s ~ ~ r~-ir Subject on which person wishes to speak:.- . ;~~cl",~. c' -/ ~~-d-~-,.~r~~. Tease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~/ F- - 9 %~ Agenda Item No. Name ~t%~//'f/~rrc < < l~fr`~~.` L c Address ~ ~C ~ ~~ ~ i ~~ ~~s't ~ If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: ~~ 7 /(~ s official capacity: Su~b,,j'ect on which person wishes to speak: ~ .... Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are ~cecognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~ ° ~, I° ~ `~ Agenda Item No. ~ l Name ~.~ ~~,> fz~~ ~, ~~~ZS~~ Address 11 ~ ~f ~j v~ ~2" ~, ~ aS~-~ `~ ~;~.~., a~-~;~ ~~ 7;~-- If speaking for an organization, Name of organ'zation: Speaker's official//.capacity: L.nu~ Oman Subject on which person wishes to speak: (,, Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are .recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~ / ~ / ~S Agenda Item No. ~ Name ~~~~ G~roc Address ~2Z 5 ~~o ~~,; ~ G rc.QQ, If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak: - ~9-~rM~nq o~ ~cp Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are .recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~ - (o -- l Agenda Item No. a Name ~i'~~!~ LZ~% ~ (__'~~'f-~ ~- Address ~ ~ ~~ z ~ ~~~~,~' X If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: ~. official capacity: pct on which person wishes to speak: Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting f' `~ -= Agenda Item No. =~ Name ~~~~ l ~ `l _ ~~c~ ,_. ~= ~_ Address /~-~~. ~ f ~' ... If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak: Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting ~ ~ ~~!~ ~~ % } Agenda Item No. Name ~~ 1_ ~; ;~ ~ c_ ~' . T (-lJ~`• C 5 ~::-, Address ~-~ ~~_ I`' K .~~• ~~'~ , If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: n. ~ ~ iJ _..~.~. ,,. i'b~°~_ Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak:( ~~ ~ ~..~, ~~ -i ~", _. ~. ,~ ~ -mac ~1- ~,,.( Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting _ ~~ ~-~ Agenda Item No, `~' ~ ~ ~~~ ~„~ Name l~~ ~~ ~'?,~"_' c: ~.-- ~ >~.~_~ ~..;- Address ~ ~~r ~ ~,c``_ ~!V'~'~ ~~ If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: /~ / 7 ,~ Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak: ~ - ,~..a( f Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are #recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting - ' Agenda Item No. - Name .I - ,; - - . %~ , ~~-- Address - ` - ~ _~ ,~_ ,,_ ~ ~ , If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: Subject on which person wishes to speak: Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are .recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. Registration Form • (For persons who wish to address the Commission) Date of Meeting Agenda Item No. i r r: Name ~:, ~ ~ L i~,.~<-~ Address - /`~,,- If speaking for an organization, Name of organization: Speaker's official capacity: ~~„ . ~ ~.. ~ i :f~. ._ . Subject on which person wishes to speak: ~ -t , ~. f'~' ,~ n f~~<,, ~l ~~~ ~ ~ , t , i ~ ~ , ~< ~, ~ , ,' T'lease remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair, hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR PLANNING FILES. 'Canning ~' ZoninB Commission Guest 7~e~ister '; '' Date , ~, ~~ ~(~ Acfcfress 4. s 6. ~. 8. B~~ ~rK~~~w ~L o-( ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ C~ .~ D3 ~5w~~~rj~~~~ ~T _5; 3 cx~~ t2J sr ---~ ~c., Q,4KS ~~ ~~~ 9. ~ o E ~ -S~ l ~ vyZ ti Ey G 1 ~~ G- lo. i~lik~ ~- ~~~~ ~~«~~ 12. ~} /~J/~. ~~ ~IQ ~~ ~ 320>~lcc~~9 %~~~ l~ ~ ~t~ ~ r ~ -~ ~~ r ~` /p i ~~ , 2z. ~ ~, ~~'~~'-~ ~~~~r3 ~C~r~~st~,-e7`~~sa CTS ~s. .~ /- G~f, _~ ,. ,,~ ~. ~T 2 j Vii' ~ r L C: Ic .~-tt-~ --` ~ S ~ r ,, ~ , ~~.~~ ~~ ° '~=~ir„~, lam' ,, ~- ~ • •