HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/07/1992 - Minutes - Planning & Zoning Commission
MINUTES
Planning and Zoning Commission
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
7:00 P.M.
May 7, 1992
•
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Sawtelle, Vice Chairperson Colson, Commissioners
Esmond, Hawthorne, Hall, Smith and Mariott.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Senior Planner Kee, Planning Technician Thomas, Staff Planner
Kuenzel, Assistant to the City Engineer Morgan, Transportation
Planner Hard, Development Coordinator Volk and Planning
Director Callaway.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Approval of the minutes from the meeting of April 16, 1992.
Vice Chairperson Colson moved to approve the minutes of the meeting of April 16, 1992 as
corrected by Mr. Smith. Mr. Mariott seconded the motion which passed unopposed (7 - 0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Public hearing to consider a conditional use permit request by the
Bryan/College Station Islamic Community to locate an Islamic Center on Lots 11, 12 and 13 of
Block 2 in the Tauber Addition. (92-706)
Staff Planner Kuenzel presented the staff report stating that the Commission has reviewed this
site at three separate meetings in that took place over the past three years. The hearing were
held on the following issues:
Apri120, 1989 P&Z approved the use only;
October S, 1989 P&Z approved the site plan with the condition that a
fence be provided;
October 18, 1990 P&Z approved a new conditional use permit and
accompanying site plan were required because the
applicants changed the building from one to two stories.
•
The conditional use permit that was granted in 1990 has expired because there has been no
building permit issued. The site plan contains some minor changes from the one that was
approved in 1990.
Mr. Esmond questioned staff as to the condition of approval in 1990. Was there not a
condition that prohibited the use of outdoor speakers or gongs?
Staff Planner Kuenzel stated that she was unaware of any such conditions; however, she would
review the minutes of the previous meeting to be certain. The applicant has requested to
continue the use of the duplex in order to lease to students; however, they will provide more
parking for the duplex.
• Chairperson Sawtelle opened the public hearing.
Nabil Safwat, representative of the applicant, approached the Commission and offered to
answer questions pertaining to the conditional use permit request. He stated that there is an
average of 75 members depending upon the student population. There are five prayer services
throughout the day; however, most of the people only attend the prayer services in the evening.
The tower shown on the site plan is only a few feet above the second floor. The tower is an
architectural symbol for a religious facility and will not be used for any practical purposes.
Dale Fox of 2904 Aztec, approached the Commission and explained that he owns 23 of the 28
Normandy Condominiums located across the street from the site in question. He is opposed to
the conditional use permit because of two items:
-- the church will only cause more congestion in an area where traffic is
already at a maximum; on-street parking is always occupied by students; and,
-- the values of surrounding properties will decrease.
Mr. Fox stated that a special on the television program "20/20" proved that surrounding
property values would decrease when a religious facility was allowed to locate in a residential
area. The same thing that is currently happening in Los Angeles is happening here in College
Station. If this church is allowed to operate near the Normandy Condominiums, Mr. Fox suited
that he will have to declare bankruptcy. He agreed to obtain a copy of the "20/20"
documentary for the Commission to review if they would postpone action on this item.
Charles Szabuniewicz of 3801 Fifth Street in Bryan, approached the Commission and stated that
• he owns five units adjacent to the property in question. He stated that he is concerned with
parking and additional traffic. If the use were to expand, there would not be adequate ofC-
street parking. Vehicles are already parking in the grass; with the addition of this facility, the
City is only adding to an already congested area.
Mr. Safwat stated that this facility will increase the property values because members of this
church will probably want to rent in this area.
Hshan Moharan approached the Commission and explained that he is a graduate student at
Texas A&M. He stated that he lives in this area and would like to walk to the proposed
Islamic Center for prayer services. The present condition of the proposed site is not well kept
and needs to be better maintained. The building will raise the property value as well as
provide for maintenance of the site. Currently there is no place to pray and services are being
held in various apartments and homes. The building will help bring the community together
and provide some understanding of the Islamic religion.
Chairperson Sawtelle closed the public hearing.
Mr. Hawthorne questioned staff as to the traffic impact of this type of development.
Staff Planner Kuenzel stated that the site plan meets off-street parking requirements for any
church. There is not much that can be done for the traffic congestion short of a complete
redevelopment of the area.
Mr. Hall questioned the applicant as to the possibility of removing the duplex to provide
• additional parking for vehicles or bicycles.
P & Z Minutes May 7, 1992 Page 2
• Mr. Safwat stated that the duplex is a source of income for the organization. At this time,
there is not enough money to build a larger building or increase the parking lot. The church
would like to keep the duplex as long as it is economically viable. If maintenance costs get too
high, the church may look at demolishing the structure. All parking requirements have been
met on the current site plan.
Mr. Smith stated that if parking is such an issue, then students parking in this area may take
over the proposed parking lot and make it unavailable to the occupants. There are not many
places to walk around the building.
Chairperson Sawtelle agreed and stated that a sidewalk was considered with the previous
conditional use permit request; however the site plan submitted does comply with the
ordinance.
Vice Chairperson Colson moved to grant a conditional use permit to the Bryan/College Station
Islamic Community to establish an Islamic Center on Lots 11, 12 and 13, Block 2 of the Tauber
Addition. Mr. Hawthorne seconded the motion.
Mr. Esmond stated that the site is very close; it meets minimum City standards. The question is
whether it is in harmony with the surrounding uses in the area. There are land owners present
that say it will be detrimental to the neighborhood. Mr. Fox has offered to provide additional
information and the Commission has not answered him. The proposed Islamic Center is more
of a commercial operation in a clearly residential area. There is existing traffic congestion in
this area and poor access locations to this site. By granting this use permit, the Commission will
only make these existing problems worse.
• Vice Chairperson Colson stated that he was not sure if this was more of a residential area or a
church area. He added that he is still unclear of how a church could possibly have a
detrimental effect on surrounding land values.
Mr. Esmond replied that the Commission has not studied this issue and he would like to have
the opportunity to do so before taking action on this item.
Mr. Hall stated that churches generate as much traffic as commercial uses. This church will
generate more traffic because it meets five times a day everyday of the year. This will definitely
add to congestion whether it's vehicle, pedestrian or bicycle traffic.
Vice Chairperson Colson stated that the Commission cannot zone areas for churches. This
church needs to be located close to campus because of the number of students that attend.
There will always be congestion in areas close to campus.
Chairperson Colson called the question of the original motion to grant the conditional use
permit. The motion passed (6 - 1); Mr. Esmond voting in opposition to the motion.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Public hearing to consider a final replat of Lots 6 and 7 of Block 8A
in the College Park Subdivision. (92-201)
Assistant to the City Engineer Morgan presented the staff report recommending approval of the
proposed final plat. This replat is at the corner of Ayrshire and Angus Streets. The right-of-
way for Galloway Avenue was approved for abandonment by the City Council on January 23,
1992. This replat complies with the City's comprehensive land use plan, transportation plan,
• development policies and zoning ordinance. Fourteen surrounding property owners were
notified of this plat with 15 inquiries.
P & Z Minutes May 7, 1992 Page 3
Chairperson Sawtelle opened the public hearing.
David Mayo, representative of the applicant, approached the Commission and explained that
the proposed final plat reflects the current condition of the property. There are three separate
dwelling units on this property. The street alignment changed after the original plat was filed
so the original right-of-way is no longer needed. There are no proposed changes to the
property itself.
Earl Bennett of 500 West Dexter approached the Commission and explained that he wants to
preserve the character of the neighborhood. He is concerned with the development of smaller
lots at the intersection of Welsh and Guernsey that would not keep in character with this
neighborhood. He is opposed to the development of smaller lots with smaller structures that
would ultimately provide rental property.
James Bassett Senior of 303 West Dexter approached the Commission and explained that he is
not opposed to the final plat as long as the duplexes are not being separated by a property line.
Chairperson Sawtelle closed the public hearing.
Vice Chairperson Colson explained that he understood the concerns of the visitors; however,
the Commission cannot consider what type of structure can be built on these lots.
Mr. Mariott moved to recommend approval of the final plat of College Park, Lots 6 and 7,
Block 8A as submitted. Vice Chairperson Colson seconded the motion which passed
unopposed (7 - 0).
• AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Consideration of a final plat of Kapcbinsld Hill Subdivision. (92-203)
Assistant to the City Engineer Morgan presented the staff report recommending approval of the
proposed final plat. A presubmission conference was held for this replat on April 23, 1992.
The applicant has addressed all comments made at that time with two exceptions. Staff
requested that the scale of the drawing be increased to make the replat more readable and that
a cross access agreement be provided between this property and Brazos Square. The applicant
feels that the redrawn plat is more readable even though it is not drawn to a larger scale. Staff
has not received confirmation of the cross access easement between this property and Brazos
Square. The Commission has the authority at the plat stage to determine what constitutes a
building plot for the determination of signage. To be consistent with previous actions, lots 1
and 4 would constitute a building plot and lots 2 and 3 would constitute a building plot. This
means that lots 3 and 4 would not be allowed a freestanding sign. Staff recommends approval
contingent upon the filing of this cross access easement and owners signatures on the plat.
Representative of the applicant Roy Hammons approached the Commission and explained that
entire plat will comply with the crass-access agreement. The two additional lots will not be
allowed curb cuts onto Texas Avenue., He understands that the Brazos Square property owner
has no problem with the proposed access agreement; however, he has not seen an executed
document. The worst thing that could happen is that Target could file a unilateral agreement
providing access if the Brazos Square property owner refused to provide access. Mr. Hammons
added that he is currently working on the revised driveway configuration for Brazos Square
Shopping Center; however, the owner of the center has not approved the plan. The revised
final plat should be more readable than the plat submitted originally. If the plat were to be
drawn at a larger scale, it would have to be drawn on two sheets. Mr. Hammons concluded
that not all of the property owners have signed the plat; however, he has submitted a fax to
• staff stating their desire to have this plat approved. The only reservation is that they would like
to have the cross access easement filed as a verbal metes and bounds document defining their
use and dimensions as well as a plat to match the description.
P & Z Minutes May 7, 1992 Page 4
• Mr. Esmond stated that the "P.U.E." designation is somewhat confusing since there are both
public and private utility easements on this plat. He would suggest that all public and private
utility easements be identified.
Vice Chairperson Colson stated that the Commission cannot consider the cross access
agreement at this time; it should have been considered prior to the completion of this project.
There should be an option available to the applicant if this agreement cannot be obtained.
Senior Planner Kee explained that the City Council asked for this agreement prior to the
original plat. The development policies state that this type of agreement can be required. The
City will probably not hold up this final plat if Brazos Square refuses to participate in this
agreement; however, this should not be a problem.
Mr. Haskins of Culpepper Realty, the owner of lot 3, approached the Commission to discuss
future signage in this area. He proposed that lot 4 be restricted to a low profile sign and lot 1
be allowed to have 383 feet of frontage to allow 200 square feet of freestanding signage. The
H.E.B. sign is currently a 17 x 7 freestanding sign with 4 additional sign cans. The proposal will
allow this sign to have only 2 additional sign cans and place a low profile sign on the additional
lot. Mr. Haskins added that he would make the same request on Lot 3 to restrict this lot to a
low profile sign and allow Target the existing freestanding sign.
Senior Planner Kee explained that the Commission has the discretion to determine at the plait
stage what constitutes a building plot for signage purposes. It appears that Mr. Haskins is
entering into the area of a variance request; the Commission does not have the authority to
grant such a variance request. She stated that she is unsure if when separate building plots arc
established if the Commission can then limit signage to the various lots; this would have to he
clarified by the legal department.
Chairperson Sawtelle stated that she would agree to a low profile sign on lot 4; however, she
would not want to see a freestanding pole sign.
Mr. Esmond stated that this development is definitely two building plots. The proposal
presented and the low profile sign is acceptable. If this information could be reference on the
plat, it would eliminate any confusion in the future.
Vice Chairperson Colson moved to recommend approval of the final plat of Kapchinski Hill
Subdivision with the condition that a note be placed on the plat stating that the cross access
agreement is encouraged and the Commission would recommend that lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 be
considered separate building plots so that lots 3 and 4 be limited to low profile signs; if this is
not acceptable legally, the Commission would recommend that lots 1 and 2 be designated as
separate building plots and lots 3 and 4 could then proceed to the Zoning Board of Adjustment
for a variance request. Mr. Hawthorne seconded the motion.
Mr. Esmond moved to amend the motion to include that the scale presented be approved and
that all public and private utility easements be clarified. Mr. Colson seconded the amendment
which passed (6 - 1); Mr. Hall voting in opposition to the amendment.
Mr. Hall stated that he is opposed to allowing low profile signs on lots 3 and 4. The existing
Target and H.E.B. freestanding signs should accommodate new businesses on this site. Lots 1
and 2 should be considered as two separate building plots and Lots 3 and 4 should be limited
to signs attached to the buildings or to the existing signs.
• Chairperson Sawtelle called the question of the original motion recommending approval which
passed (6 - 1); Mr. Hall voting in opposition to the motion.
P & Z Minutes Mr~y 7, 1992 Page S
• AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Consideration of a preliminary plat for the Oakgrove phase of the
Springbrook Subdivision. (92-304)
Chairperson Sawtelle informed the Commission that presentations on items five and six would
be given simultaneously and voting on these items would be done separately.
Senior Planner Kee presented the staff report of the preliminary plat of Oakgrove located on
the southwest corner of the Springbrook Subdivision. The area is bounded by Barron Road on
the south and the future Longmire extension on the east. The Subdivision Regulations say
whenever possible, street jogs with centerline offsets of less than 125' shall be avoided. The
offset between Falcon Way and Cardinal Lane is 110' as proposed. Staff encouraged the
developer to try to increase this offset if possible. The applicant has since increased this offset
distance to 114'. Sidewalks may be required along residential streets at the discretion of the
Commission. Staff recommends a sidewalk along the north side of Cardinal Lane and the east
side of Robin Trail. Depending on the location of proposed utilities, additional easement or
right-of-way may be needed. The property drains into the South Fork of Lick Creek, which is
located along the northern boundary of this property. Adequate space is provided to contain
100 year flood flows. Future maintenance of this creek will be addressed between the
developer and the City with details determined as construction documents are prepared for final
plats. The drainage impact study shows that all new drainage facilities that carry water to Lick
Creek will be placed underground. The 100-year flood elevation was established and all lots are
located outside that elevation. The subdivision will have no adverse impact on the downstream
properties. Staff agrees with the developer that there should be no on-site detention required.
This preliminary plat has been changed from the master preliminary plat that was previously
submitted. There have been no additional impact studies submitted relative to traffic. This
preliminary plat included thirteen additional acres and twenty-seven additional lots. St~tfl feels
. that all planned collectors and minor arterials will accommodate these additional lots. Staff
recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the condition that sidewalks be placed along
the north side of Cardinal Lane and the east side of Robin Trail. Cardinal Lane needs only a
50' right-of-way. The Commission should recommend whether to accept the offset between
Cardinal Lane and Falcon Way as proposed.
Assistant to the City Engineer Morgan presented the staff report for the final plat of Cypress
Meadow located west of the State Highway 6 frontage road and north of Barron Road in the
Springbrook Subdivision. A preliminary plat of this area was approved by the City Council on
March 26, 1992. The final plat as submitted closely follows the approved preliminary plat. The
final plat complies with the City's comprehensive plan. Drainage from this subdivision is
generally in the southerly direction with flow into the South Fork of Lick Creek. The applic~int
will clear a 15' path along the north side of the creek and construct a 10' wide stabilized path
for pedestrian and emergency vehicular access to the creek for maintenance. The final plat is
located outside the 100 year flood plain. Lots 9 - 11 and 27 - 33 are all located adjacent to the
100 year floodplain and have minimum finished floor elevation requirements stipulated on the
plat. Oversize participation requests will be made on Longmire Drive and the primary sanitary
sewer line constructed with this phase. Sidewalks are required by ordinance on one side of
Eagle Avenue. A sidewalk is required on one side of Hawk Owl Cove because of action taken
by the Commission and Council at the time of the preliminary plat for this subdivision. The
applicant has requested that he not be required to build that portion of Longmire Drive shown
on this final plat. He has requested to enter into a development agreement with the City to
provide for monetary compensation for the construction of Longmire Drive through this area at
some future date. Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the conditions that a 5
utility easement be added as requested in the Project Review Committee meeting and that the
• Commission make a recommendation with regard to the timing of installation of Longmire
Drive.
P & Z Minutes May 7, 1992 Page 6
• Staff recommended that the Longmire extension be installed as follows: all of that portion west
and adjacent to Cypress Meadow including the bridge be installed at the time of Cypress
Meadow Phase II or within a reasonable time frame to assure its completion if Cypress
Meadow Phase II is not completed. The portion of Longmire from the bridge to Barron Road
could be constructed with the phase that is first considered for a final plat.
Mr. Esmond stated that the master preliminary plat failed to show any subdivision of the
unplatted area. He questioned staff as to what the traffic impact study concluded with regard
to internal circulation.
Assistant to the City Engineer Morgan stated that the unplatted area was included in the
impact studies. The Commission will probably see similar or revised impact studies if the
development changes from what was originally submitted.
Transportation Planner Hard stated that internal circulation is provided with the bridge
structure and access to Barron Road. Eagle Avenue should ultimately connect with the
proposed north-south arterial which would provide ample internal circulation. Staff is
recommending that Longmire end at Barron Road.
Mr. Esmond expressed concern with the internal circulation especially with regard to access to a
sub-standard Barron Road. When the State Highway 6 frontage roads go one way, there will
still be a circulation problem. People will have to travel away from town to get back into town.
Longmire is important to the subdivision to provide internal circulation. Mr. Esmond
questioned staff as to a reasonable time frame for the installation of Longmire.
Assistant to the City Engineer stated that staff and the applicant had agreed to three to four
• years or the installation of Cypress Meadow Phase II, whichever comes first.
Mr. Esmond questioned staff as to the benefits of aligning Falcon Way and Cardinal Lane
instead of the proposed 114' centerline offset. The Falcon Way cul-de-sac could be
reconfigured in order to maintain the same number of lots and align with Cardinal Lane.
Transportation Planner Hard stated that traffic should not be very heavy on these residential
streets. Staff sees no problem with the proposed 114' offset.
Applicant Dan Bensimon approached the Commission and stated that these two areas arc
separate subdivisions. The proposed offset is only 11' less than ordinance requirements. Thcrc
will not be much traffic in this area and most vehicles will not be travelling between
subdivisions. The alignment of Cardinal Lane and Falcon Way is not possible because of the
location of the creek. Mr. Bensimon added that he has agreed to build Longmire, dedicate the
necessary right of way and post the required amount of security; however, the timing of
installation is the issue. If the street is built now before the subdivision is fully developed, the
extension will become a maintenance problem for the City.
Mr. Esmond slated that Cardinal Lane looks a lot like Barthelow with no place to turn around.
Transportation Planner Hard explained that the intent is that Cardinal Lane be extended and
remain as a residential street. A collector street is not needed because Eagle Avenue to the
north will be a collector and south of that is a minor arterial. Cardinal Lane serves sixty lots
which is a typical residential street. There should not be much movement in this area except
for the people who live there.
• Engineer Mike McClure requested that sidewalks be placed on the west side of Robin Trail
instead of the east side as proposed by staff.
P & Z Minutes May 7, 1992 Page 7
Assistant to the City Engineer Morgan agreed and stated that staff had no problem with
sidewalks being located on the west side of Robin Trail.
Vice Chairperson Colson moved to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for the
Oakgrove phase of the Springbrook Subdivision with the condition that sidewalks be placed un
the north side of Cardinal Trail and on the west side of Robin Lane; the 114' offset between
Cardinal Lane and Falcon Way is acceptable. Mr. Hawthorne seconded the motion.
Mr. Esmond moved to amend the original motion to place a condition of approval on the
preliminary plat to increase the right-of-way along Cardinal Lane from fifty feet to sixty feet.
The motion died due to lack of a second. The original motion passed unopposed (7 - 0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Consideration of a final plat for the Cypress Meadow phase of the
Springbrook Subdivision. (92-204)
See item number 5 for presentation and discussion.
Mr. Esmond moved to recommend approval of the final plat for the Cypress Meadow phase of
the Springbrook Subdivision with the condition that a five foot utility easement be continued
along Lots 50 and Lots 36 - 39 and with the staff recommendation that Longmire be installed
with three to four years or the Cypress Meadow Phase II development, whichever comes first.
Mr. Mariott seconded the motion.
Mr. Hawthorne moved to amend the original motion to include a condition of approval to
provide a sidewalk along the west side of Hawk Owl Cove. Vice Chairperson Colson seconded
the amendment which passed unopposed (7 - 0). The original motion to recommend approval
passed unopposed (7 - 0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7: Consideration of the Master Development Plan and Master
Preliminary Plat for Pebble Creek Phase II. (92-302)
Senior Planner Kee presented the staff report for the master development plan for the entire
Pebble Creek Subdivision and the master preliminary plat for Pebble Creek Phase II. At build-
out, the entire subdivision will contain approximately 2,000 lots. Phase two consists of 126
single family lots, a future location for villas and the location for the clubhouse facility. Greens
Prairie is shown as a major arterial with Rock Prairie as a minor arterial. Two additional. minor
arterials are shown going through this area; one providing a connection from Greens Prairie to
Texas Avenue and the other providing east-west movement from Texas Avenue to Rock Pr~iirie.
One north-south collector is shown where Marsh Boulevard currently exists. The tralfic imp~ict
analysis indicates that the existing and planned roadways for and surrounding the development
can accommodate the amount of traffic to be generated by the subdivision. However, it
indicates that the subdivision does not have internal circulation, but does not recommend a
connection between the east and west sections of the subdivision. The impact study provided
ample reasoning to support its recommendation that an east-west minor arterial, as shown on
the Thoroughfare Plan, was not the best location for this thoroughfare. Staff is in general
agreement with all of the findings and recommendations of the traffic impact analysis with the
exception of the lack of the east-west connection between the two sections of the subdivision
and the proposed classification of the roadways in the subdivision. Sidewalks are required along
one side of Augusta Circle and both sides of Champions Boulevard. Sidewalks may be required
along Stonebriar Circle at the discretion of the Commission. The drainage impact study
provided that detention facilities will be provided throughout the subdivision to meet the
• requirements of the drainage ordinance. Existing ponds and proposed ponds throughout the
subdivision will be designed to provide the detention wherever possible. Applicant has
indicated that they will be requesting some areas without detention, which still meeting the
requirements of the drainage ordinance.
P & Z Minutes May 7, 1992 Page S
• Senior Planner Kee stated that the master development plan includes 65 acres that is currently
owned by the City of College Station. The developer is currently negotiating for the purchase
of this additional acreage and this area will become a part of the subdivision as shown. The
master plan as proposed does not provide for east-west movement between Rock Prairie and
State Highway 6. Staff recommends this connection for the following reasons:
(1) will reduce congestion by providing improved internal circulation,
(2) will provide alternate routes for emergency vehicles,
(3) will provide continuity in the internal street system for service delivery and
maintenance, and
(4) will provide the greatest traffic efficiency (provide residents the opportunity
to get where they want to go by the shortest possible route).
Although the thoroughfare plan shows this connection to be a minor arterial, staff is in
agreement with the impact analysis indicating that the spacing between minor arterials would be
more appropriate at 7,000 feet, which would place it at either Nantucket Drive or Snug Harbor.
Therefore, the connection needs only be a collector. Staff also recommends collector sic
streets rather than residential streets in two locations due to the high number of dwelling units
that will utilize these streets. Staff recommends that consideration be given to bikeways within
the subdivision.
Senior Planner Kee stated that the master preliminary plat complies with the master
development plan, the comprehensive plan and development policies and with the minimum
• standards established in the zoning ordinance. The subdivision regulations require minimum
residential street radii to enable adequate maneuvering room for service vehicles. The applicant
is currently working on revising a portion of this plat in order to meet ordinance requirements.
Staff recommends approval of the master development plan and master preliminary plat with
the following conditions:
(1) provide for an east-west collector on the plan, and
(2) change two residential streets to collector streets on the plan.
Applicant A. P. Boyd approached the Commission and stated that the proposed east-west
connection is premature. If additional land cannot be acquired from the City of College
Station, the connection may not be needed. He added that he would agree to work with staCC
on the details of this connection at a later date.
Transportation Planner Hard stated that the thoroughfare plan shows an east-west connection
in this area. Staff has not determined on an exact location and is willing to work with the
applicant on preferred locations.
Mr. Boyd stated that the City should participate in the costs of providing this connection
because the City will benefit the most from the connection. The City has over 500 acres in this
area while the Pebble Creek development has only 175 acres.
Development Services Director Ash approached the Commission and stated that the park was
originally set up as a 500 acre wilderness park. There are no future development plans for this
• park. The connection would allow residents of Pebble Creek to access this wilderness park.
The connection will benefit the residents, the developer and the City. This document does nut
have to retlect the actual location of a connection; however, the Commission can suggest that
staff look into the location of a connection if this is desired.
P & Z Minutes May 7, 1992 Page 9
• Mr. Hall moved to recommend approval of the master development plan of the Pebble Crcc;k
Subdivision with the following notes:
(1) a collector street be noted for future consideration with City participation
in the bridge or equivalent dollar amount as done with other
developments, and
(2) the two residential streets shown be changed to collector streets as
recommended by staff.
Mr. Hall added that the applicant and the City need to agree at an early date on what will be
required cost wise. Mr. Mariott seconded the motion which passed (6 - 1); Mr. Colson voting in
opposition to the motion.
Mr. Mariott moved to recommend approval of the master preliminary plat of Pebble Creek
Phase II with staff recommendations of requiring sidewalks along Champion Drive and Augusta
Circle and with the condition that the applicant reconfigure the area in question so as not to
require a variance to the subdivision regulations. Mr. Hall seconded the motion which passed
unopposed (7 - 0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8: Other business.
There was no other business.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9: Adjourn.
• Vice Chairperson Colson moved to adjourn the meeting of the Planning and Coning
Commission. Mr. Hawthorne seconded the motion which passed unopposed (7 - 0).
APPROVED:
/~
~~!
Chairperson, ancy Sawtelle
A
ATTESTS f `~ ;"
~,7~~,,~:a ~;i1l;i~ „
Plafining Technician, Natalie Thomas
•
P & Z Mlnutes May 7, 1992 Page 10
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
GUEST REGISTER
•
NAME.
/~
~ .~
4.
5•
6.
~•
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23•
24.
25•
~ -,
L.~~" /
DATE ~ ~ /~ y., ~ I<~~ .-,~
ADDRESS
U \ > ~ /I
/' i ~ ~
I
~-
r ~
~-~ ~ ~) ;~ <- ~ f-;; ~ ,
./
r
~~
_.
A ~. ~. \---~ x.