HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/08/1973 - Minutes - Planning & Zoning Commission MINUTES
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 8, 1973
7:00 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman M. R. Calliham; Commissioners James Wallace,
George Boyett, Tom Chaney, John Longley, and Ed Miller;
and City Planner George Eby;
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Bill Cooley and Council Liaison Don Dale
VISITORS PRESENT: See Guest Register
Agenda Item No. 1 - Approval of the minutes of the December 18, 1972 meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Calliham and on
motion by Commissioner Boyett, seconded by Commissioner Longley, the minutes
were approved with the following correction. Commissioner Wallace pointed out
that he made the motion to adjourn the meeting of December 18, 1972.
Agenda Item No. 2 - Recommendationto the City Council concerning a system for
the establishment of a Citizens' Advisory Committee for use in the "701" Plan.
Dr. Charles Pinnell of Pinnell - Anderson - Wilshire and Associateg the "701"
Planning Consultants for College Station, delivered a short presentation concerning
a Citizens' Advisory Committee and the needs, goals, and objectives requirement
of the "701" Plan. The formal approach recommended by the Consultants was listed
in the enclosed Exhibit B which was a part of a memorandum to the Planning and
Zoning Commission (Exhibit B and the memorandum are attached as a part of these
minutes).
Dr. Pinnell then requested that the Planning and Zoning Commission:
1. Review and recommend an overall approach to the needs, goals and
objectives program and a formal system for the development of a Citizens' Advisory
Committee.
2. Appoint a committee to work with the City Planner and Planning Consultant
to recommend the following to the City Council:
(a) Develop a list of names for the selection of the district chairmen and
committee members;
(b) Define procedures for obtaining citizen input to goals formulation
process at the district level;
(c) Assist with the overall program.
Chairman Calliham then called for a motion and on motion by Commissioner Longley,
seconded by Commissioner Wallace, the Commission unanimously agreed to recom-
mend to the City Council that the Consultant's recommendation for the establishment
of a Citizens' Advisory Committee and overall approach to the needs, goals, and
objectives program as shown in the enclosed memorandum and Exhibits A and B, be
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 8, 1973 Page 2
adopted for use in the on-going "701" Plan.
Chairman Calliham then appointed Commissioners Miller, Wallace and Chaney to
serve on a committee to work with the city planner and Planning Consultants in
the manner suggested above.
Agenda Item No. 3 - P&Z Case No. 41-72 - A public hearing concerning a request
for rezoning Tract F of the Plantation Oaks Subdivision from District R-1, Single
Family Residential District, to District C-N, Neighborhood Business District.
City Planner George Eby located the tract of land in questirn for the benefit of the
audience and Commission members. Mr. Harry Seaback followed with the commentary
that he felt that since Highway 30 is to be a four-lane highway, he felt that the site
would be good for a business of some kind. Mr. Jim Austin, representing the pro-
posed purchaser of the land, displayed building plans and stated that it would be
similar to the "Wee Village" in Bryan.
Chairman Calliham read a letter in protest of the proposed zone change from the
First Baptist Church (the letter is attached as a part of these minutes).
Chairman Calliham called for a public hearing after stating that all persons who
wished to speak would speak from the podium and would give their name and address.
Commissioner Boyett then asked to separate the pros and cons. A call for all
favorable comments was issued and when no one spoke in favor of the request, a
call for adverse comments was issued. The following is a brief summary of speakers
and their commentary.
Kenneth Wolf - a representative of the Board of Deacons of Baptist Church delivered
a letter in protest to Chairman Calliham (the letter is attached as a part of these
minutes). Mr. Wolf stated that a small business such as a convenience store in
close proximity to a church would be incompatible with Sunday worship services and
would create problems.
Leslie Bagnell - continuous changes in property and zoning of that property creates
a worry for community and loss of planning effectiveness. Mr. Bagnell wanted the
Commission to require that developers stick with their plans.
Dr. H. O. Hartley - agreed with Mr. Bagnell - City needs continuity and needs to
avoid arbitrary rezoning, rezone only when absolutely necessary, recommended
attitude of reasonableness and avoid atmosphere of, "Well, it's zoned this way today,
but who knows about tomorrow?" Dr. Hartley also stated that the Commission should
consider the possible loss of confidence of the homer owners.
• Ed Powell - if made into a retail area, they could sell beer, whiskey. . . could be a
saloon. (Note: C-N allows alcoholic beverage sales with no on-premise consumption).
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 8, 1973 Page 3
A. D. Folweiler believed that open spaces were vital to high density areas and
was dismayed to find that the park had been converted.
Bo Jackson - stated that he lives in the apartment complex and that it was only a
two-minute drive to existing stores, and he saw no real economic value of a
store there. Mr. Jackson felt that there was a greater need for a park than a
store at the site.
Dr. Thomas Kozik - indicated that a lack of confidence could result from changes
in plans. . . from satisfying one and dissatisfying another. Dr. Kozik felt that only
extraordinary reasons should cause change in zoning.
Art Sherwood - felt the Commission should be hard-nosed about zone changes.
Mrs. Frieda Kozak - asked the Commission to consider three things:
1. Is it wise?
2. Is it necessary?
3. Is it in the best interest of the community?
J. W. Wood - discussed P-U-D concept of mix. He encouraged total planned
units - avoids serious debates such as this.
Tay Bond - owner of 75 acres across Highway 30,spoke for the change in that "developers
set out what he feels is best use of the land at the time - but conditions change -
developers have best interest of City at hand - be willing to consider change in overall
plan.
Dr. H. O. Hartley - quick change through use of the zoning instrument destroys
confidence of residents of City with City government.
Betty Foster - What will happen to adjacent land to the rear? It would not be deemed
suitable for residences then. Would only receive a future request for more rezoning.
Unidentified woman - All the protesters here are property owners and churchmen.
Where are all the students? How about their interests?
The public hearing was then closed and Chairman Calliham stated that the Planning
and Zoning Commission was a recommending body only and that the developer could
take his request to another public hearing of the City Council.
Chairman Calliham called for a motion and on motion by Commissioner Chaney, seconded
by Commissioner Wallace, the Commission unanimously agreed not to recommend
ip,
approval of this zone change request to the City Council.
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 8, 1973 Page 4
Agenda Item No. 4 - Presentation of a historical map of the Carter Creek Flood Plain
as shown by the Soil Conservation Services Soil Survey of Brazos County as the Gowan
and Occlockonee Soil Series with other engineering flood plain data included. City
Planner George Eby gave a brief presentation of the map and stated that it was a map
consisting of all available public knowledge of the Creek and its tributaries such as
Bee Creek, Wolf Pen Creek, Burton Creek and Briarcrest Creek. There were twenty-
four calculated data points which were tied together by the use of the Soil Conservation
Service maps of the Gowan and Ohclockonee Soil Series which are alluvial, flood plain soils.
Dr. Wayne Williams, a soil expert employed by the Bryan office of the Soil Conservation
Service, explained why the soils could define a historical flood plain. He cautioned that
the future flood plain would be greater than the historical flood plain due to rapid urbani-
zation and an increased run-off.
Additional increases in elevation can be expected when Millican Lake is installed.
First stage conservation pool is to be 218 feet above sea level. When the Navasota
Lake is built; flood protection capability would be shifted to the Navasota Lake and
the conservation pool of Millican would be raised to 228.
Consequently, an increased back water curve would occur and an increase in the flood
S` plain level should be expected.
After a review of the flood plain map, the Commission decided to continue with a
study of the flood insurance program.
Agenda Item No. 5 - Continued review and approval of a PUD Submission Requirement
Policy as proposed by the City Planning Department. The Commission reviewed the
policy and felt that it was necessary in order to provide equal treatment of all PUD's.
After a short discussion, the policy was unanimously approved on motion by Commissioner
Boyett and seconded by Commissioner Chaney.
Agenda Item No. 6 - Other Business. As there was no items to be discussed at the
January 15 meeting, the meeting was cancelled.
Agend
g d Item No. 7 - Adjourn. On motion by Commissioner Longley, seconded by
Commissioner Boyett, the meeting was unanimously adjourned, subject to call.
PPROVED:
141
4, Chairman
ATTEST:
g;11/‘'
ri i \ /\_ I, ' i ' ( ' 2 ' ' zi ' 1 i (' ( / /- ' ---:--;•'•-;,,__,
V _ .,.._
,_.
, -
t--' /-- .
- I
. ,
//// 7-4-,.1/' '-- - /' -
)
64
e.,,,,,./4 0,
,_ 9y4,,,az.a4 sL444 ,2 i .
176,0 . T
_
Al KS rig_ iv,e,67.2.,
/
'
-,......_._.,
C it Ac2-TT"7----
X
/ ,