Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/07/2018 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionPlanning and Zoning Commission Workshop College Station, TX Meeting Agenda - Final City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting. City Hall Council Chambers6:30 PMThursday, June 7, 2018 1. Call the meeting to order. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff. *Final Plat ~ Minor Plat ~ Tarrow Townhomes Block 1, Lots 1A - 11A & Common Area #1 ~ Case #FP2018-000009 18-03734. Sponsors:Lazo Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Semi-Annual Update of Pre-Application Conference (PAC) Surveys as part of the 2018 P&Z Plan of Work. 18-03695. Sponsors:Golbabai Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: *Thursday, June 14, 2018 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 5:00 p.m. Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison - Mather) *Thursday, June 21, 2018 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. Regular 7:00 p.m. *Thursday, June 28, 2018 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 5:00 p.m. Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison - Osborne) *Thursday, July 5, 2018 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. Regular 7:00 p.m. 18-03626. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: *A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to update the 2018 Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on April 19, 2018, and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on May 14, 2018 and voted (6-0) to approve the request. *A Rezoning for approximately 4 acres located at 15307 FM 2154 from 18-02937. Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 6/1/2018 June 7, 2018Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Agenda - Final R Rural to WC Wellborn Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 3, 2018, and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on May 24, 2018, and voted (6-0) to approve the request. *A Rezoning for approximately 4 acres located at 15135 FM 2154 from PDD Planned Development District and SC Suburban Commercial to WC Wellborn Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 3, 2018, and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on May 24, 2018, and voted (6-0) to approve the request. 8. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board. 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 10. Adjourn. The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on June 1, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. _____________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 6/1/2018 June 7, 2018Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Agenda - Final “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 6/1/2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular College Station, TX Meeting Agenda - Final City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting. City Hall Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, June 7, 2018 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 4. Consent Agenda Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes. *May 17, 2018 ~ Workshop *May 17, 2018 ~ Regular 18-03634.1 May 17 2018 Workshop May 17 2018 Regular Attachments: Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding waiver requests to the Unified Development Ordinance Sections 8.3.G.2.c and 18-03666. Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 6/1/2018 June 7, 2018Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final 8.3.G.4.b ‘Blocks’, and a presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Bertrand Subdivision consisting of one multi-family lot, one commercial lot, one common area and 2.3 acres of Right-of-Way on approximately 27.8 acres generally located on the south side of Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, approximately 530 feet west of Earl Rudder Freeway South. Case #PP2017-000015 Sponsors:Helton Staff Report Waiver Request Vicinity Map & Aerial Application Preliminary Plan Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix “A”, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural and GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 31 acres of land located at 1775 Greens Prairie Road West and 1590 Arrington Road, more generally located at the southwest intersection of Arrington Road and Greens Prairie Road West. Case #REZ2017-000033 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 14th City Council Meeting- Subject to change.) 18-03677. Sponsors:Helton Staff Report Background Information Vicinity, Aerial & SAM Application Rezoning Map Zoning Exhibit Concept Plan PDD Supplemental Standards Sign Plan Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from GS General Suburban to D Duplex for approximately 4.69 acres of land located on Aurora Court. Case 18-03658. Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 6/1/2018 June 7, 2018Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final #REZ2018-000007. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the June 28, 2018 City Council meeting - subject to change) Sponsors:Broadnax Staff Report-Aurora Court Rezoning (2) Background Information Vicinity, Aerial, & Small Area Map Rezoning Application Rezoning Exhibit Zoning Map Attachments: 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 10. Adjourn The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on ___________, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. _____________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 6/1/2018 June 7, 2018Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 4 College Station, TX Printed on 6/1/2018 May 17, 2018 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Workshop Meeting May 17, 2018 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Casey Oldham, Johnny Burns, Bill Mather, Jeremy Osborne, Elianor Vessali and Dennis Christiansen COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jane Kee CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: John Nichols CITY STAFF PRESENT: Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, David Coleman, David Schmitz, Troy Rother, Kelly Kelbly, Johnathan Wood, Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton, Justin Constantino, Rachel Lazo, Lauren Hovde, Laura Gray, Jason Schubert, Erika Bridges, Tim Horn, Anthony Armstrong, Alma Guerra, Carla Robinson, Judith Rauscher and Kristen Hejny 1. Call the meeting to order. Acting Chairperson Osborne called the Workshop Meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. There was no discussion. 3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was general discussion amongst the Commission. 4. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding the 2018 P&Z Plan of Work. Assistant Director of Planning & Development Services Hitchcock presented updates on the Plan of Work. 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding past growth trends and implications for future planning efforts in the College Station/Bryan area by County Commissioner Steve Aldrich. County Commissioner Aldrich was available to present to the Commission. There was general discussion. 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. *Thursday, May 24, 2018 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 5:00 p.m. and Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison – Vessali) May 17, 2018 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 *Thursday, June 7, 2018 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:30 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. *Thursday, June 14, 2018 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 5:00 p.m. and Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison – Mather) *Thursday, June 21, 2018 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: *An Ordinance annexing approximately 65 acres on the west side of the City. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on February 15, 2018, and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on April 26, 2018 and voted (7-0) to approve. *A Rezoning for approximately 36 acres located at 4001 Harvey Road from PDD Planned Development District to T Townhome. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on April 5, 2018, and voted (5-1) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on April 26, 2018, and voted (5- 2) to approve the request. *A Rezoning for approximately 12 acres located at 4001 Harvey Road from PDD Planned Development District to MF Multi-Family. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on April 5, 2018, and voted (5-1) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on April 26, 2018, and voted (5- 2) to approve the request. *A Conditional Use Permit for a Food Truck Park located at 203 First Street. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on April 19, 2018, and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on April 26, 2018, and voted (7-0) to approve the request. 8. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Bio Corridor Board. There was no discussion. 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion. 10. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ May 17, 2018 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 Jeremy Osborne, Acting Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin. Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services May 17, 2018 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 5 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting May 17, 2018 7:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Casey Oldham, Johnny Burns, Bill Mather, Jeremy Osborne, Elianor Vessali and Dennis Christiansen COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jane Kee CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: John Nichols CITY STAFF PRESENT: Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, David Schmitz, Kelly Kelbly, Johnathan Wood, Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton, Justin Constantino, Rachel Lazo, Laura Gray, Lauren Hovde, Jason Schubert, Erika Bridges, Tim Horn, Anthony Armstrong, Alma Guerra, Carla Robinson, Judith Rauscher and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order Acting Chairperson Osborne called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Hear Citizens 4. Consent Agenda 4.2 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes. *May 3, 2018 ~ Workshop *May 3, 2018 ~ Regular Commissioner Christiansen motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Burns seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed. Commissioner Oldham recused himself from the meeting. 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding waiver requests to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.3.E3 ‘Street Projections’, Section 8.3.E.4 ‘Adequate Street Access’, Section 8.3.E.7 “Cul-de-Sac’, Section 8.3.G.2.c ‘Blocks’, Section 8.8.C.2 ‘Land Dedication, and a presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Greens Prairie Reserve May 17, 2018 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 5 consisting of 906 Residential lots on approximately 367 acres generally located to the southeast of Greens Prairie Road West and west of Arrington Road. Case #PP2018-000001 Principal Planner Paz presented the waiver requests and Preliminary Plan to the Commission recommending approval of waivers numbered 10-12; 14-18; 22; and 25-35 and recommending denial of waivers numbered 1-9; 13; 19-21; 23; and 24, stating that if any waivers are denied, the Preliminary Plan must also be denied. There was general discussion regarding traffic and the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). Applicant, Rabon Metcalf, RME Engineers, was available to present to the Commission regarding the Preliminary Plan and waiver requests. Commissioner Mather inquired about the Waters of the U.S., and asked for the approximate linear footage on site and the type of permitting for the area. Mr. Metcalf estimated 2050 linear feet, stating that they have received nationwide permitting. Hunter Goodwin, Oldham Goodwin, was available to present to the Commission regarding thoroughfares and street projections. Commissioner Christiansen inquired about street projections and sufficient connectivity within the development. Mr. Metcalf responded that there are three points of major connectivity. Commissioner Mather asked for the radius of cul-de-sac. Mr. Metcalf approximated a four-foot reduction in the radius of the cul-de-sacs. Brian Shamburg, Kimley Horn, spoke to connectivity in the development. Commissioner Christiansen asked for levels of service. Mr. Shamburg stated there would be a good level of service. Mr. Goodwin spoke to the sequencing of the thoroughfare connections. Commissioner Burns motioned to approve all waiver requests as requested by the applicant, citing that all criteria are met. Commissioner Christiansen seconded the motion. There was general discussion. The motion passed (5-0). Commissioner Mather motioned to approve the Preliminary Plan as presented. Commissioner Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). May 17, 2018 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 5 Commissioner Mather motioned to approve the amount of parkland dedication as presented by the applicant. Commissioner Vessali seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). The meeting recessed at 9:07 p.m. after agenda item #6. Items #7 & #8 were heard before item #6. 7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat of Memorial Cemetery of College Station Section MC2A-R and MC2X-R Being a Replat of Memorial Cemetery7 of College Station Section MC2A, and MC2X, located at 3800 Raymond Stotzer Parkway near the intersection of Harvey Mitchell Parkway and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. Case #FPCO2018-000005 Senior Planner Hovde presented the Final Plat to the Commission and recommended approval. Applicant, Director of Parks & Recreation Schmitz, was available to address the Commission regarding the replatting. Acting Chairperson Osborne opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Acting Chairperson Osborne closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mather motioned to approve the Final Plat. Commissioner Vessali seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for CityView Southwest Subdivision Lots 1R and 2-17, Block 1 and Common Area 1 being a Replat of CityView Southwest Subdivision Lot 1, Block 1 consisting of 17 non-residential lots and one common area on approximately 8 acres, generally located at the western corner of the Barron Road and William D. Fitch Parkway intersection. Case #FPCO2017-000005 Senior Planner Hovde presented the Final Plat to the Commission and recommended approval. Applicant, Joe Schultz, was available to address the Commission regarding the replat. Acting Chairman Osborne opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Acting Chairman Osborne closed the public hearing. Commissioner Oldham motioned to approve the Final Plat. Commissioner Christensen seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). The meeting reconvened at 9:13 p.m. prior to item #9. Commissioner Oldham recused himself from the meeting. May 17, 2018 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5 9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District on approximately seven acres generally located along the south side of Lakeway Drive, approximately 130 feet east of Medical Avenue. Case #REZ2018- 000004. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the June 14, 2018 City Council meeting – subject to change) Senior Planner Helton presented the Rezoning to the Commission and recommended approval. Applicant, Rabon Metcalf, RME Engineers, was available to answer any questions from the Commission. Acting Chairman Osborne opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Acting Chairman Osborne closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mather motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning. Commissioner Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). Commissioner Oldham returned to the meeting. 10. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 7, “General Development Standards,” Section 7.6, “Landscaping and Tree Protection,” and Section 7.7, “Buffer Requirements” regarding updates to non-residential landscaping and buffer standards. Case #ORDA2018-000008 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the June 14, 2018 City Council meeting – subject to change) Staff Planner Lazo presented the Ordinance Amendment to the Commission and recommended approval. There was general discussion. Acting Chairman Osborne opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Acting Chairman Osborne closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mather motioned to recommend approval of the Ordinance Amendment. Commissioner Oldham seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. May 17, 2018 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5 Commissioner Mather request a Plan of Work item on cluster developments. 12. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Jeremy Osborne, Acting Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services Planning & Zoning Commission June 7, 2018 Scale One multi-family lot, one commercial lot, one common area and 2.3 acres of Right of Way on approximately 27.8 acres Location Generally located on the south side of Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, approximately 530 feet west of Earl Rudder Freeway South. Applicant Doug French Project Manager Alaina Helton, Senior Planner ahelton@cstx.gov Project Overview In July 2017, the subject property was rezoned to GC General Commercial with OV Corridor Overlay, MF Multi-Family, and NAP Natural Areas Protected. Divided into 3 phases, this preliminary plan is in preparation for the future subdivision of the property into one commercial lot and one multi-family lot and includes the extension and right-of-way dedication of Dartmouth Street (a planned major collector) through the property. Parkland Dedication Parkland for the Multi-Family lot will be determined at time of site plan. Traffic Impact Analysis A TIA was required with the rezoning of the property in 2017. A revision to the TIA was made with the Preliminary Plan to reflect the guaranteed construction of the extension of Dartmouth Street as shown on the Preliminary Plan. Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes, with the exception of waivers being requested with this preliminary plan. Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, with the exception of waivers being requested for the following section of the subdivision regulations: Section 8.3.G.2.c ‘Blocks’ Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending approval of the waivers and the Preliminary Plan. Supporting Materials 1. Waiver request 2. Vicinity Map & Aerial 3. Application 4. Preliminary Plan Preliminary Plan for Bertrand Subdivision PP2017-000015 SUBDIVISION WAVIER REQUESTS The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the UDO except for the following waiver requests: UDO Section 8.3.G.2.c Blocks (Block Length for Urban and General Commercial) – This section requires that block length be a maximum of 660 feet in Urban designations – Three waivers are being requested for the three blocks that do not meet this requirement as proposed: 1. The block length for Block 1 (the block face on west side of Dartmouth Street, from Harvey Mitchell Parkway South to Morgans Lane) is proposed to be 1,035 feet. The requested waiver for this block is 375 feet which is a 57% increase over the current requirement. 2. The block length for Block 1 (the block face along Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, between Dartmouth Street and Texas Avenue) is 1,820 feet. The requested waiver for this block is 1,220 feet which is a 184% increase over the current requirement. 3. The block length for Block 2 (block face along Harvey Mitchell Parkway South from Dartmouth Street) is 677 feet. The requested waiver for this block is 17 feet which is a 3% increase over the current requirement. UDO Section 8.3.G.4.b Blocks (Block Perimeter for Urban) – This section requires that block perimeter be a maximum of 2,000 feet in Urban designations – One waiver is being requested for Block 1, that does not meet this requirement as proposed: 4. The block perimeter for Block 1 (includes property located along the south side of Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, bounded on the west by the future extension of Dartmouth Street, running along the north side of Morgans Lane, and bounded on the east by Texas Avenue) is proposed to be 4,500 feet. The requested waiver for this block is 2,500 feet which is a 125% increase over the current requirement. In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver (Staff findings are in italics). Each waiver request is addressed individually in the order listed above: Waiver 1: Section 8.3.G.2.c Blocks – Block 1 (block face on west side of Dartmouth Street, from Harvey Mitchell Parkway South to Morgans Lane) has a block length of approximately 1,035 feet, which exceeds the maximum by 375 feet. Staff recommends approval of this waiver request. 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The block is within 375 feet (57%) of the required 660-foot block length. Proposed Block 1 is zoned Multi-Family and the lots to the south and west are part of the Lake View Acres subdivision. It is unlikely that the adjacent property to the west will replat, requiring the extension of the street given that it is entitled for General Commercial uses. Requiring a break in the west block face along Dartmouth Street would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the land. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waiver is not granted, Block 1 can still be subdivided. However, it would require a street through the multi-family lot that is intended to be developed as a unified multi-family project. A break in the block would require a street through the lot, and this street would likely not be extended to Texas Avenue given that the properties to the west are platted and currently entitled for General Commercial uses. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and Granting this wavier would not be detrimental or injurious to other property. The multi-family tract has frontage and two potential points of access along Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, and will have frontage onto the future Dartmouth Street (major collector) extension and Morgans Lane. 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The granting of the waiver will not prevent the orderly subdivision of the other land, as the surrounding properties are platted and have frontage to existing Right-of-Way. Waiver 2: Section 8.3.G.2.c Blocks – Block 1 (block face along Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, between Dartmouth Street and Texas Avenue) has a block length of 1,820 feet, which exceeds the maximum by 1,160 feet. Staff recommends approval of this waiver request. 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; Requiring the introduction of a street within this block face would deprive the applicant of a reasonable use of the land as Block 1 would be the only lot with frontage to the new street. The preliminary plan proposes that the multi-family lot will have frontage along future Dartmouth Street (major collector) and Morgans Lane. Additionally, requiring a street along Harvey Mitchell Parkway South would create two lots, and the multi-family lot (Block 1, Lot 1) is intended to be developed as a unified multi-family project. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waiver is not granted, the subject tract can still be subdivided. However, a break in the block would require a street through the multi-family lot, which is intended to be developed as a unified multi-family project. Additionally, the multi-family lot (Block 1, Lot 1) would be the only lot with frontage to the new street. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and Granting this wavier would not be detrimental or injurious to other property. The multi-family tract has frontage and two potential points of access along Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, and will have frontage onto the future Dartmouth Street (major collector) extension and Morgans Lane. Additionally, breaking the lot will not provide additional access to other properties within the vicinity. 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The granting of the waiver will not prevent the orderly subdivision of the other land, as the surrounding properties are platted and have frontage to Right-of- Way. Waiver 3: Section 8.3.G.2.c Blocks – Block 2 (block face along Harvey Mitchell Parkway South from Dartmouth Street) has a block length of 677 feet, which exceeds the maximum by 17 feet. Staff recommends approval of this waiver request. 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The block is within 17 feet (3%) of the required 660-foot block length. Strict adherence to the 660-foot maximum would shift the entire width of the new street onto the adjacent Townhome tract, rather than the proposed location that provides access to both the Townhome and Commercial tract. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waiver is not granted, the subject tract can still be subdivided. However, requiring that the new street be entirely located on the Townhome tract would be disproportionate to the development. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and Granting this wavier would not be detrimental or injurious to other property. This block is located is only 17 feet short of the 660-foot maximum length, and the location is advantageous to both the Townhome and Commercial tract. 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The granting of the waiver will not prevent the orderly subdivision of the other land, as both adjacent tracts have access along Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, and will both have access to future Dartmouth Street. Waiver 4: Section 8.3.G.2.b Blocks – Block 1 (includes property located along the south side of Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, bounded on the west by t he future extension of Dartmouth Street, running along the north side of Morgans Lane, and bounded on the east by Texas Avenue) has a block perimeter of approximately 4,500 feet, which exceeds the maximum by 2,500 feet. Staff recommends approval of this waiver request. 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The block is within 2,500 feet (125%) of the required 2,000-foot block perimeter, and is part of the Lake View Acres subdivision. Requiring the introduction of a street within the block face fronting Harvey Mitchell Parkway South would deprive the applicant of a reasonable use of the land, as Block 1 would be the only block with frontage to the new street. Additionally, requiring a break in the west block face along Dartmouth Street would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the land, as it is unlikely that the adjacent property to the west will replat, requiring the extension of an additional street from future Dartmouth Street, given that it is entitled for General Commercial uses. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waiver is not granted, Block 1 can still be subdivided. However, it would require a street through the multi-family lot that is intended to be developed as a unified multi-family project. A break in the block would require a street through the lot, and this street would likely not be extended to Texas Avenue given that the properties to the west are platted and currently entitled for General Commercial uses. Additionally, the multi-family block (Block 1) would be the only block with frontage to the new street. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and Granting this wavier would not be detrimental or injurious to other property. All of the surrounding properties are platted and have frontage onto existing right -of- way. Additionally, breaking the block will not provide additional access to other properties within the vicinity. 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The granting of the waiver will not prevent the orderly subdivision of the other land as the surrounding properties are platted and have frontage to existing Right-of-Way. Summary of staff recommendations Staff is recommending approval to all four waivers. PRELIMINARY PLANBERTRAND SUBDIVISIONCOLLEGE STATION, TEXASBleyl EngineeringTexas Firm Registration No. 678Planning • Design • ManagementBleyl EngineeringBleyl EngineeringOFF RAMP SH 6 SWILLIAM KING COLE DRVALLEY VIEW DRLONGMIRE DRAIRLINE DRPONDEROSA DRTIMBER KNOLL DRBENT TREE DRSEBESTA RDWOODCREEK DRFLINT CRSPRING CREEK SHADOWCREST DRSTONEBROOK DRALLEYBENT OAK STJADE CTKIPLINGBROTHERS BLALLEYSH 6 S FRONTAGE RD WSUNLAKE CTSTONEBRIDGE DRESSEX GREENSCA RBOROUGH DRTOPAZ CTFAIRFAX STGRAMMA CTALLEYFARLEYLAUREN DR BRITTAIN CTFERBER CRBERMUDA CTNORMAND DRBROTHERS BLBRIAR ROSE CTRESCUE CTBLUE STEM DRROSEWOOD DRHALEY PLLONGLEAF DRPIERRE PLTREEHOUSE TRFRIARBRITTANY DRLAKESIDE CTFERGUSON LODGEPOLE DRAMBER RIDGE DRFOXFI RE DR TODD TRSPRINGWOOD CTREDWOO D ST PAVI LION AVALLEYALLEYSANDSTONE DRHENRY CTALLEYOFF RAMP SH 6 SAUSTIN AVSH 6 FRONTAGE RD AMBERWOOD CTFOXFIRE DRSUMMIT STHAWK TREE DRCELINDA CR ROCK PRAIRIE RDJENNIFER DRHADDOX CTSANDY CRHILLSIDE DRLONGLEAF CRLODGEPOLE CRFONTAINE DR SARA DRADRIENNE DRSAN FELIPE DR PINON DRALLEYEMERALD PLZCHIPPEND ALE STLAKE FOREST CT NEARL RUDDER FW S FRONTAGE RD E ALLEYJUSTIN AV AL ISON AV ALLEYON RAMP SH 6 S OFF RAMP SH 6 STECHNOLOGY PWOFF RAMP EARL RUDDER FW SOAKWOOD TROFF RAMP SH 6 SCORSAIR DRBROOKWATER CRQUEENS CTFERN CT ALLEY RIVER STONE CTAMETHYST CTAUTUMNWOOD DREMERALD PWOFF RAMP SH 6 SNOEL CTSUSSEX DRHILLTOP DRAMBE R HILL CTDRIFTWOOD DRCREEKVIEW CT WILSHIRE CTFIELDS CRWATERFORD DRALLEYGREENWOOD DRGREENL EAF DRBLUESTEM CRON RAMP EARL RUDDER FW SPROJECTLOCATION VICINITY MAPSCALE: 1"=100'0 50' 100' 200' 400'NPRELIMINARY PLAN- NOT FOR RECORDDETAIL ALEGEND 3 3 33 PRELIMINARY PLANBERTRAND SUBDIVISIONCOLLEGE STATION, TEXASBleyl EngineeringTexas Firm Registration No. 678Planning • Design • ManagementBleyl Engineering Bleyl Engineering O F F R A M P S H 6 SWILLIAM KING COLE DRVALLEY VIEW DRL O N GM I R E DR AIRLINE D R PONDERO S A D R TIMBER KNOLL DRBENT TRE E DRSEBESTA RDWOODC R E EK D R FLI N T C R SP R I N G C R E E K SHADOWCREST DRSTONEBROOK DRALLEYBENT OAK STJADE CT KIPLINGBROTHE R S B L ALLEY SH 6 S F R O N T A G E R D W SUNLAKE C T S TONE BR IDG E DR ESSEX GR E E N SCA R B O R O U G H D R TOPAZ CT FAIRFAX STGRAMM A C T AL L E Y FARLEYLAU R E N D R BRI T T A I N C T FERBER CR BERMU D A CTNORMAND DRBROTHERS BLBRIAR RO S E C T RESCUE C T BL U E S T E M D R ROSEWOOD DRHALEY PL L O N G L E A F D R PI E R R E P L TREEHOUSE TRFRIAR BRITTANY DR LA K E S I D E C T FERGUSO N LODGEPO LE DRAMBER RI D G E DR FO X F I R E D R TODD T R SPRING W O O D CT RE D W O O D S T PAV I L I O N A V ALL E Y AL L E Y SANDSTONE DR HENRY CT ALLEYOF F R AMP SH 6 S AUSTIN A V SH 6 FRONTAGE RDA M B E R WO O D C T FOXFIRE DRSUMMIT ST HAWK T REE D R CELINDA CR ROCK PRAIRIE RD JENN IFER DR HADDOX CT SA N D Y C R HILLSIDE DR LO N G L E A F C R LO D G E P O L E C R FONT A I N E DR SARA DRADRIENNE DRSAN FEL IPE DR PINON DRAL LEY EMER A L D P L Z CHIP P E N D A L E S T LAKE FOREST CT NEARL RUDDER FW S FRONTAGE RD E AL L E Y JU S T I N A V ALI S O N A V ALLEYON R A M P S H 6 S OFF RAM P SH 6 S TECHN O L O G Y P WOFF RAMP EARL RUDDER FW SOAKWOOD TROFF RAMP SH 6 SCORSAIR DRBROOKWATER CRQUEENS CT F E R N C T ALL E Y RIVER STONE CTAMETHYST C T AUTUMNWOOD D R EMERAL D P W O F F R AM P S H 6 S NOEL CT SUSSEX DR HIL L T O P D R AMB E R H I L L C T DR I F T W O O D D R CRE E K V I EW C T WILSHIRE CTFIELDS CRWATERFORD DRALLEYGREENW O O D D R GR E E N L E A F D R BL U E S T E M C R ON RAMP EARL RUDDER FW S PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"=100' 0 50' 100'200'400' N PRELIMINARY PLAN- NOT FOR RECORD N DETAIL A LEGEND PRELIMINARYUTILITY PLANCOLLEGE STATION, TEXASBleyl EngineeringTexas Firm Registration No. 678Planning • Design • ManagementBleyl Engineering Bleyl Engineering SCALE: 1"=100' 0 50' 100'200'400' N PRELIMINARY PLAN- NOT FOR RECORD BERTRAND SUBDIVISION June 7, 2018 Regular Agenda Rezoning – Caprock 31 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Alaina Helton, Senior Planner, Planning & Development Services Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix “A”, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural and GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 31 acres of land located at 1775 Greens Prairie Road West and 1590 Arrington Road, more generally located at the southwest intersection of Arrington Road and Greens Prairie Road West. Case #REZ2017-000033 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the June 14th City Council Meeting- Subject to change.) Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the PDD Planned Development District zoning request and associated Concept Plan. Summary: This request is to rezone 31 acres located at the southwest intersection of Arrington Road and Greens Prairie Road West, from R Rural and GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning of GC General Commercial and MF Multi-Family to provide a mix of uses with central open space. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as Urban on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map and is a part of Growth Area II. The Comprehensive Plan recommends that the Urban portion of Growth Area II, described as land nearest the William D. Fitch Parkway and State Highway 6 interchange, be used for intense land use activities including general commercial activities, office uses, townhomes, apartments, and vertical mixed-use. This Growth Area further limits residential development to no more than 25% of this total area designated as Urban. Currently within Growth Area II, approximately 16% of the area designated as Urban is zoned or developed for residential uses. With the addition of the multi-family uses proposed with the PDD Planned Development District (approximately 16 acres), the total Urban area dedicated to residential uses would be approximately 21%. The proposed PDD Planned Development District permits general commercial and multi- family uses consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as well as the Growth Area II residential allowance, while also leaving room for additional residential development in the future. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: A portion of the property is currently zoned GC General Commercial and allows for commercial, retail and office uses. The R Rural zoning that was designated at the time of annexation allows for large lot residential and/or agricultural uses, which is not compatible or supportive of more intense development that is anticipated for the area. The proposed commercial and multi-family uses are compatible with the adjacent Caprock Crossing and Greens Prairie Center development, but incompatible with the adjacent 7.5 and 4.9 acre home sites. However, given the property’s close proximity to multiple new developments in the area, and its designation of Growth Area II in the Comprehensive Plan, the proposed PDD Planned Development District with a GC General Commercial and MF Multi-Family base is appropriate to support the planned growth of the area. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the districts that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The property is relatively flat and naturally vegetated. The proposed commercial and multi-family land uses are appropriate as they support the uses planned in the vicinity. The proposed development is in proximity to the Tower Point and Caprock developments, and will support the current southward growth of commercial development in the area. The mix of commercial and multi- family provide diversity in the housing options in the south College Station area while in close proximity to major general commercial concentrations. 4. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property is zoned GC General Commercial and R Rural. While the large lot residential uses allowed under the R Rural zoning district are marketable, the current development patterns on nearby property and the anticipated change in in the area moving forward make R Rural a less desirable land use compared to more intense general commercial and multi-family alternatives. 5. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: There are existing 12-inch waterlines along the west side of Arrington Road and the south side of Greens Prairie Road West. An 8-inch sanitary sewer main traverses the tract along the eastern side of the property. Currently, there is limited downstream sanitary sewer capacity, and the applicant is aware that improvements will be needed in the future to support full build out of this development. Stormwater from the site is split between the Spring Creek and Alum Creek drainage basins, generally discharging to the north and south, respectively. Detention is required in this area and will be further analyzed with the site plan. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject property has frontage to Arrington Road and Greens Prairie Road West which are both classified as 4-lane Minor Arterials on the Thoroughfare Plan. Arrington Road is currently constructed as a Major Collector and Greens Prairie Road West is currently constructed as a 4-lane undivided Minor Arterial. A City capital project is currently under way to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of these two roadways and create dual left turns on eastbound Greens Prairie and to add a thru/right lane. The design for a future City capital project has begun that will widen Greens Prairie Road West to 4 lanes with a raised center median. The proposed development is planned to have two driveways to Arrington Road and one right- in/right-out driveway to Greens Prairie Road West. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was submitted and analyzed ten existing and proposed intersections. The TIA included the proposed City capital projects as well as anticipated traffic from other r ecently approved development projects. The TIA indicates all intersections will function at an acceptable level of service and the northern driveway on Arrington Road is planned to have a right-turn deceleration lane. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed land uses as well as access points external and internal to the property. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD Concept Plans: 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. General: The Concept Plan proposes a mix of Multi-Family and Commercial development with a base zoning of MF Multi-Family and GC General Commercial as shown on the Concept Plan. The stated purpose and intent of the requested PDD is “to create a dense, urban development that directly overlooks a large, common, centrally located greenspace/open space to create a distinctive destination that attracts people and encourages social interaction. Buildings and patios will front the open space, providing comfortable and relaxing views for residents, tenants and customers. The open space will be utilized by tenants, retail and restaurant customers and the general public, and will provide pedestrian connectivity through the site”. The Concept Plan proposes Multi-Family development that fronts Arrington Road and a future Public Way, with commercial uses located along Arrington Road and Greens Prairie Road fronting a common central open space. Commercial buildings adjacent to the central open space will be subject to sign and non-residential architectural requirements, with some minor modifications. A new Public Way is proposed to cross through the property, extending from Arrington Road through the development and connecting into Greens Prairie Road. Community Benefits: The applicant offers the following as community benefits: • Sense of Place – Large, common, pedestrian-oriented open space for public use with vehicles and traffic concentrated away from pedestrian activity. • Connectivity – Pedestrian access will be provided to the open space with planned sidewalk connections to the various uses within the development. • Placemaking – Buildings and patios fronting onto the open space will create a distinctive destination that attracts people and encourages social interaction. • Sustainability – Provides a place to live, work, shop, and play. The goal is to create a development which offers amenities not necessarily found in every other development or neighborhood. The density of retail/office components in a walkable environment allow for the potential of office workers to walk to lunch or to shop. Furthermore, the Multi-Family units allow for the potential of employees to work and live in close proximity, which reduces automobile trips generated. Meritorious Modification Requested: A list of modifications requested through the PDD Planned Development District development standards are included in the document titled “PDD Supplemental Standards”, attached to this staff report. These modifications include requirements for Permitted Uses, Off-Street Parking and Subdivision regulations and minor modifications to the NRA and Sign standards as outlined in the Exhibit B standards. A summary of the meritorious modifications is listed below: Permitted Uses GC General Commercial uses along with multi-family land uses as allowed in Multi-Family except as follows. 1. To contribute to a Live-Work-Play environment and provide entertainment uses within walking distance, it is proposed that Bar/Tavern/Night Clubs be allowed by right in the areas designated as Multi-Family on the Concept Plan subject to all applicable regulations, including not being located within 300 feet from a church, public hospital, and public school as defined in the Code of Ordinances. 2. In order to mitigate adverse impacts of adjacent residential property, in addition to the required screening between Multi-Family and Single-Family uses, the applicant proposes that Outdoor areas/patios or entrances to a Bar/Tavern/Night Club not be located on the side of the building adjacent to single-family land use and/or zoning. 3. To create a destination restaurant district with outdoor patio space overlooking the Open Space Area, Restaurants with a Drive-through are prohibited within the PDD. Parking Off-Site and Mixed Use Shared Parking is permitted in areas designated as General Commercial on the Concept Plan, subject to distance requirements and approval of a shared parking plan. Signs The sign regulations for the base zoning districts of GC General Commercial and MF Multi-Family will be utilized for this development with the following modifications for General Commercial: 1. The area permitted for attached signs will be calculated per the UDO, except that a maximum of seven hundred fifty (750) square feet of Attached Signage is allowed for any one (1) tenant. Attached Signs may be cantilevered away from the structure so long as the sign does not project more than three (3) feet from the connecting façade. An attached sign can be parallel or perpendicular to the face of the building; 2. Light Pole signs are permitted and may be constructed of cloth, canvas, or other flexible material provided such signage is maintained in good condition and complies with the following restrictions: a. No part of any sign attached to a light pole will be allowed to overhang or encroach into the public right-of-way b. Light pole signs shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet in area and shall have a minimum of eight (8) feet of clearance from the grade below; c. Light pole signs shall only be attached to one (1) side of a light pole; d. Light pole signs shall not project more than three (3) feet from the edge of the light pole; and e. Light pole signs constructed of cloth, canvas, or other flexible material shall be secured on a minimum of two (2) opposing sides to prevent wind-driven movement. 3. Free-Standing Multi-Tenant Signs shall be permitted in the two locations shown on the Sign Plan Exhibit. 4. The Subdivision Sign as shown on the Sign Plan Exhibit shall be no greater than two hundred (200) square feet in area and no greater than twenty (20) feet in height and must be set back at least twenty (20) feet from the back of curb. 5. Wayfinding Signs are permitted and shall be internal to the development. Wayfinding Signs shall in no case be greater than fifty (50) square feet in area or greater than six (6) feet in height. Non-Residential Architecture (NRA) Standards In order to offset the proposed modifications to the NRA standards and create a pedestrian- oriented open space area, facades that face open spaces are subject to the same non-residential architectural standards as facades that face a right-of-way or public way (i.e. building material and architectural relief elements, etc.). 1. Building Mass and Design: a. Horizontal Façade Articulation – For all properties within this PDD the vertical wall plane of any façade visible from public right-of-way, street, or public way shall project and/or recess by a minimum of two (2) feet so that no more than sixty-six (66) percent of the façade is on the same plane. 2. Building Entry Design: b. Buildings that have multiple ground floor tenants or multiple primary building entrances shall have all entrances treated architecturally, unless the entrances are for service or maintenance areas. 3. Architectural Relief: a. In order to provide visual interest, the first two (2) stories of any primary façade or façade visible from a public right-of-way or public way shall use at least one (1) architectural relief element for every fifty (50) horizontal feet, or part thereof, of façade length. b. The design elements may be grouped or spaced as needed along the façade, though in no case shall more than one hundred (100) feet of continuous horizontal length be void of a relief element. c. Architectural relief is not required for façades, or parts of a façade, that are within twenty (20) feet of another building that screens the façade. 4. Qualifying Architectural Relief Elements: a. In addition to the architectural relief elements permitted for property zoned GC General Commercial as outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance as it exists or may be amended, the following types of architectural relief may be utilized to meet the requirements of this Section: • Covered front porch extending along at least fifty (50) percent of building façade and projecting a minimum of four (4) feet from the face of the building, if used on a façade where this feature is not already required; • Eaves in excess of eighteen (18) inches, if used on a façade that does not have a covered front porch; • Transom windows; • Recessed entries, stoops, porches, or arcades; • Cornices, corbelling, quoining, or stringcourses; and • Other architectural relief elements that provide a visual interest to the affected façade and are of a physical scale to possess architectural significance may be approved by the Administrator. 5. Other Mass and Design Requirements: a. For all properties within this PDD – Loading docks, overhead doors and service entries shall not face the Open Space Areas or a public right-of-way. These areas may be located on a façade facing a public way. In the case that more than two (2) façades face a public right-of-way, the Administrator shall determine the most appropriate façade for such activities. Setbacks In order to create a distinctive destination that attracts people and encourages social interaction between the commercial uses and open space, the following portions of a building containing non-residential uses may encroach into required Building Setbacks adjacent to the Open Space Area(s): eaves, roof extensions, porches, terraces, steps, attached signs, lighting fixtures, railing, balconies, canopies, awnings, window sills, belt courses, cornices, outdoor seating areas, patios, sidewalk cafes, plazas, water features and similar improvements approved by the Director of Development Services. Subdivision Regulations 1. Street Projection – A Street Projection shall not be required to the adjacent single-family property along the southern boundary of the property. 2. Block Length – Block Length and Block Perimeter shall be provided as shown on the Concept Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the PDD Planned Development District zoning request and associated Concept Plan. Attachments: 1. Background Information 2. Vicinity, Aerial & Small Area Map 3. Application 4. Rezoning Map 5. Zoning Exhibit 6. Concept Plan 7. PDD Supplemental Standards 8. Sign Plan NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 7, 2018 Advertised Council Hearing Date: June 14, 2018 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Castlegate, Nantucket Preservation Association, South Hampton and Cove of Nantucket Property owner notices mailed: Sixteen (16) Contacts in support: None Contacts in opposition: One at the time of staff report. Inquiry contacts: One at the time of staff report. ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Urban & Growth Area II MF Multi-Family & GC General Commercial w/ Greens Prairie Overlay Commercial Retail & Undeveloped - Platted South Estate & Growth Area II R Rural Rural East Urban& Rural, R Rural & MF Multi- Family Public Facilities, Semi-Public, Rural and Undeveloped - Unplatted West Institutional/Public & Growth Area II GC General Commercial Commercial Retail & Stormwater Detention DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 2002 Zoning: GC General Commercial in 2006 and R Rural upon Annexation Final Plat: 11.73 acres is platted, Greens Prairie Center, Phase 3, Block 3, Lot 1R. The remainder property is not platted. Site development: There is a single-family structure located on the unplatted portion of the property. CAPROCK 31 (REZ2017-000033) 1775 GREENS PRAIRIE RD W; Total Acreage:31 Existing Zoning:R, GC Date Deeded to Owner:July 11, 2016 Proposed Zoning:PDD Deed Recording:V13478 P281 Present Use:Single Family, Agricultural PAC Meeting Date:9/17/2017 12:00:00 AM Proposed Use: Commercial & Multi-Family Additional Properties:1590 Arrington, same recording information AREA CONDITIONS City of College Station population is growing in this area. This rezone will provide more diverse residential options and ancillary uses. COMPATIBILITY 7KLVWUDFWLVZLWKLQòPLOHRIRWKHUFRPPHUFLDOGHYHORSPHQWVDGMDFHQWWRDQHQWLWOHGPXOWLIDPLO\WUDFWDQGDWDZHOO traveled intersection. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Proposed zoning and uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. REZONING SUITABILITY Because this site is located at a highly traveled intersection, this site is suitable for commercial development. With the single-family residences to the south, the office opportunities could allow businesses in the area to be located closer to the residents. APPLICANT:JOHNSON & PACE INCORPORATED OWNER: APPLICANT:JOHNSON & PACE INCORPORATED OWNER: CURRENT SUITABILITY This tract falls under rural designation ³as a reserve area in which future growth of the city can occur.´ PROPERTY MARKETABILITY While this site could be marketed as large-lot residential, the demand has decreased. This site is in the urban land use which is not consistent with the rural zoning designation. OTHER REASONS The purpose of this PDD re-zoning is to create a set of reasonable regulations that encourages the responsible development of a dense, urban commercial center with nearby residences, connected by a common area green space. The buildings envisioned on this site will likely be multi-story, so adapting the base UDO regulations to fit these larger scale buildings is required. BUILDING HEIGHTS Building heights will range from 1-5 stories PROPOSED DRAINAGE The majority of this site drains to the southeast. The remainder drains towards Greens Prairie Road. All drainage will be detained onsite maintaining existing flows offsite. VARIATIONS SOUGHT A list of modifications requested through the PDD Planned Development District development standards are included in the attachment titled “Zoning Narrative – Exhibit B”, attached to this application. These modifications include but are not limited to standards related to Off-Street Parking, Signs, Non-Residential Architectural Standards and Subdivision regulations. Examples are listed below: ‡Allow adjacent lots to have shared parking ‡Allow a bar/tavern/nightclub use in the Multi-Family portion of the property. ‡No minimum block length / perimeter ‡Prohibit Restaurants with a drive-through COMMUNITY BENEFITS ‡Sense of Place ±Large, common, pedestrian-oriented open space for public use with vehicles and traffic concentrated away from pedestrian activity. ‡Connectivity ±Pedestrian access will be provided to the open space with planned sidewalk connections to the various uses within the development. ‡Placemaking ±Buildings and patios fronting onto the open space will create a distinctive destination that attracts people and encourages social interaction. ‡Sustainability ±Provides a place to live, work, shop, and play. The goal is to create a development which offers amenities not necessarily found in every other development or neighborhood. The density of retail/office components in a walkable environment allow for the potential of office workers to walk to lunch or to shop. Furthermore, the Multi- Family units allow for the potential of employees to work and live in close proximity, which reduces automobile trips generated. SUSTAINED STABILITY This development will increase the housing options in the area, increasing the opportunity to live, work, and play. CONFORMITY The Land Use Plan shows that this tract should be used for Urban Development. Therefore proposed zoning and uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. COMPATIBILITY WITH USE 7KLVWUDFWLVZLWKLQòPLOHRIRWKHUFRPPHUFLDOGHYHORSPHQWVDGMDFHQWWRDQHQWLWOHGPXOWLIDPLO\WUDFWDQGDWDZHOO traveled intersection. The nearby uses will compliment one another. ACCESS TO STREETS The buildings within the proposed development will have access to a roadway that will go through the proposed development, and tie onto Arrington Road and Greens Prairie Road. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS This development will include a private park, a public way, public sidewalks, and a waterline extension. PUBLIC HEALTH This concept plan proposal will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SAFETY This concept plan proposal will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. Name of Project:CAPROCK 31 Address:1775 GREENS PRAIRIE RD W Legal Description:A007601, A BABILLE A-76 (ICL), TRACT 5, 19.334 ACRES Total Acreage:31.7 Applicant:: Property Owner:APISPEDIGREE LP JOHNSON & PACE INCORPORATED List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. City of College Station population is growing in this area. This rezone will provide more diverse residential options and ancillary uses. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. Proposed zoning and uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? This tract falls under rural designation ³as a reserve area in which future growth of the city can occur.´ Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. Because this site is located at a highly traveled intersection, this site is suitable for commercial development. With the single-family residences to the south, the office opportunities could allow businesses in the area to be located closer to the residents. REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Because this site is located at a highly traveled intersection, this site is suitable for commercial development. With the single-family residences to the south, the office opportunities could allow businesses in the area to be located closer to the residents. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. While this site could be marketed as large-lot residential, the demand has decreased. This site is in the urban land use which is not consistent with the rural zoning designation. List any other reasons to support this zone change. The purpose of this PDD re-zoning is to create a set of reasonable regulations that encourages the responsible development of a dense, urban commercial center with nearby residences, connected by a common area green space. The buildings envisioned on this site will likely be multi-story, so adapting the base UDO regulations to fit these larger scale buildings is required. Page 2 of 2 BRAZOS TEXAS LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC HIS HIGHNESS PRINCE AGA KAHN SHIA IMAMI ISMAILI GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 3, BLOCK 3, LOT 2R ZONED RURAL WELLBORN SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT OF BRAZOS COUNTY ARRINGTON TOWER SITE, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 ZONED RURAL APISPEDIGREE LP GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 3, BLOCK 3, LOT 1R (LESS 172' OF) EXISTING ZONING: RURAL PROPOSED ZONING: PDD 11.38 ACRES APISPEDIGREE LP A007601, A BABILLE A-76 (ICL), TRACT 5, 19.334 ACRES EXISTING ZONING: RURAL PROPOSED ZONING: PDD 19.47 ACRES GLENN RICHARDS A007601, A BABILLE A-76 (ICL), TRACT 1, 4.91 ACRES ZONED RURAL FREDERICK SHANNON & CORINNE M WADDELL SOUTH OAKS, LOT 16, ACRES 2.61 RURAL IN THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMSTAD DEVELOPMENT LLC A007601, A BABILLE (ICL), TRACT 5.4, 12. ACRES ZONED: MULTI-FAMILY ARRING T O N R O A D SOUTH OAKS DRIVE WELLBORN S.U.D. 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT 5770 / 219 BRAZOS TEXAS LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 2A, BLOCK 5, LOT 1R-2, ACRES 8.99 ZONED MULTI-FAMILY SHOEMAKE HOWARD A007601, A BABILLE A-76 (ICL), TRACT 1.2, 7.578 ACRES ZONED RURAL BRAZOS TEXAS LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 1, BLOCK 1, LOT 1R, ACRES 1.948 ZONED GC BRAZOS TEXAS LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC CAPROCK CROSSING PH 5, BLOCK 1, LOT 1, ACRES 1.64 ZONED GC STEP-OFF PROPERTIES LLC CAPROCK CROSSING PH 5, BLOCK 1, LOT 2R, ACRES 0.81 ZONED GC CRT ACADEMY LLC GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 2A, BLOCK 5, LOT 5R-A-6R-A-7R-A, ACRES 1.88 ZONED GC CRT MAROON INVESTMENTS LLC GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 2A, BLOCK 5, LOT 4R-A, ACRES 0.59 ZONED GC BLUE BAKER PROPERTIES LLC GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 2A, BLOCK 5, LOT 2R-A & 3R-A, ACRES 1.3 ZONED GC CAPROCK CROSSING PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION CAPROCK CROSSING, LOT COMMON AREA 1A-R & 2R, ACRES 8.93 & GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 2A, BLK 5, LOT COMMON AREA 1,2A,3,4,5,6 ZONED GC J R HOUSE LLC GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 2A, BLOCK 5, LOT 11R-A, ACRES 0.65 ZONED GC 300 VENTURES LLC GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 2A, BLOCK 5, LOT 12R-A, ACRES .59 ZONED GC SMSC PROPERTIES LLC A020200, S W ROBERTSON (OCL), TRACT 15, 4.998 ACRES HIGHWAY SIX HOLDINGS LLC A020200, S W ROBERTSON (OCL), TRACT 13.5, 20.317 ACRES RICHARDS SUZY JEANELL A007601, A BABILLE A-76 (ICL), TRACT 1.1, 4.55 ACRES ZONED RURAL 15' WATERLINE EASEMENT (AS SHOWN ON PLAT, 8830/64) 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT (5770/219) 20' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (8830/64) PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (9590/32) 20' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (10490/136) 20' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (10490/136) 20' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (5876/292) 20' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (7546/269) PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (10490/136) 7' PUBLIC UTILITY, PUBLIC ACCESS AND LANDSCAPE EASEMENT (12609/247) GREENS PRAIRIE R O A D W E S T GUARANTEE BANK AND TRUST GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 1, BLOCK 2, LOT 1R ACRES 1.675 ZONED GC CAPROCK CROSSING PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC CAPROCK CROSSING, LOT COMMON AREA 1A-R & 2R, ACRES 8.93 & GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 2A, BLK 5, LOT COMMON AREA 1, 2A, 3, 4, 5, 6 BRAZOS COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT #1 GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 3, BLOCK 3, LOT 1R (172' OF), ACRES 0.49 BRAZOS TEXAS LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 2A, COMMON AREA S 41° 11' 02" W 227.44' S 02° 13' 10" E 140.05' S 48° 40' 53" E 105.34' S 41° 17' 34" W 184.43' N 48° 49' 34" W1910.72' N 86° 07' 37" W 100.17' L=155.13, Δ=11.1869 CHORD LENGTH=154.88 CHORD BEARING=N 77° 22' 48" E S 48° 41' 04" E67.19' S 41° 18' 56" W 158.41' S 89° 56' 52" W 371.28' S 26° 26' 33" E109.08' S 63° 33' 27" W 129.82' L=733.17, Δ=55.2781 CHORD LENGTH=705.06 CHORD BEARING=S 59° 44' 13" E S 87° 22' 33" E 180.01' L=572.76, Δ=41.4539 CHORD LENGTH=560.29 CHORD BEARING=S 66° 36' 15" E N 42° 05' 34" E 8.71' L=85.45, Δ=5.4400 CHORD LENGTH=85.42 CHORD BEARING=S 45° 25' 36" E S 87° 30' 18" E70.97'L=100.34, Δ=6.3801 CHORD LENGTH=100.29 CHORD BEARING=N 56° 27' 28" E N 48° 41' 04" W 11.42' L=373.91, Δ=23.5264 CHORD LENGTH=371.29 CHORD BEARING=N 71° 12' 59" E THIS DRAWING AND RELATED SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING ALL DOCUMENTS ON ELECTRONIC MEDIA, WERE PREPARED BY JOHNSON AND PACE INCORPORATED (JPI) AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF JPI. THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE USED ONLY BY THE CLIENT TO WHOM SERVICES ARE RENDERED AND ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DESCRIBING, CONSTRUCTING, OR INSTALLING THEWORK SHOWN HEREON AT THE DESIGNATED LOCATION ON THE SPECIFIED SITE. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION REPRODUCTION OR ALTERATION, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND SHALL CAUSE THE WAIVER OF ANY EXPRESSED WARRANTIES AND ALSO SEVER ANY LIABILITIES WHICH MAY ARISE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION, USE OR RESULT OF SUCH UNAUTHORIZED USE OR CHANGES.Copyright © 2011, Johnson & Pace IncorporatedDATEBYDESCRIPTIONNO.REVISIONSENGINEERING ▪ ARCHITECTURE ▪ SURVEYING111 UNIVERSITY DRIVE EAST, SUITE 215COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840(979) 485-2844 FAX (979) 485-2845TBPE F-4691JOHNSON& PACEwebsite: www.johnsonpace.comDRAWN BY: SCALE: APPROVED BY: JOB NO.: DATE: SHEET NO.:REZONING EXHIBITNOV. 1, 2017 PB CAM 1 OF 1 4289-001 1"-80' LEGEND PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT APPLICANT:PHILIP BARGASJOHNSON & PACE INCORPORATED111 UNIVERSITY DRIVE EAST, SUITE 215COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840OWNER:APISPEDIGREE LPP.O. BOX 1709CASTROVILLE, TEXAS 78009CAPROCK 311775 GREENS PRAIRIE ROAD WESTCOLLEGE STATION, TEXASEXISTING ZONING:RURAL AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSED ZONING:PDD TOTAL SITE AREA:31 ACRES LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:A007601, A BABILLE A-76 (ICL), TRACT 5, 19.334 ACRES & GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 3,BLOCK 3, LOT 1R (LESS 172' OF) OWNER:APISPEDIGREE LPPO BOX 1709CASTROVILLE TEXAS, 78009 PROPERTIES ARE NOT WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN ORFLOODWAY ACCORDING TO FEMA MAP 48041C0325E DATED MAY 16, 2012 SITE INFORMATION VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 1000'GREENS PRAIRIEROAD WESTPROJECT LOCATION ARRINGTON ROADARRINGT O N R O A D SOUTH OAKS DRIVE WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY 60.0 '25.0'60.0'Arrington Road Greens Prairie Road OPEN SPACE RETENTION POND MULTIFAMILY ALLOWED USE: BAR/ TAVERN/ NIGHT CLUB OPEN SPACE 2.6 0 - A C R E P U B L I C W A Y DETENTION POND GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL DETENTION POND MULTIFAMILY ALLOWED USE: BAR/ TAVERN/ NIGHTCLUB SIDEWALKS WILLIAM D. FITCH PKWY ARRINGTON ROADST A T E H I G H W A Y 6 GREENS PRAIRIE ROADTHIS DRAWING AND RELATED SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING ALL DOCUMENTS ON ELECTRONIC MEDIA, WERE PREPARED BY JOHNSON AND PACE INCORPORATED (JPI) AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF JPI. THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE USED ONLY BY THE CLIENT TO WHOM SERVICES ARE RENDERED AND ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DESCRIBING, CONSTRUCTING, OR INSTALLING THEWORK SHOWN HEREON AT THE DESIGNATED LOCATION ON THE SPECIFIED SITE. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION REPRODUCTION OR ALTERATION, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND SHALL CAUSE THE WAIVER OF ANY EXPRESSED WARRANTIES AND ALSO SEVER ANY LIABILITIES WHICH MAY ARISE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION, USE OR RESULT OF SUCH UNAUTHORIZED USE OR CHANGES.Copyright © 2011, Johnson & Pace IncorporatedDATEBYDESCRIPTIONNO.REVISIONSENGINEERING ▪ ARCHITECTURE ▪ SURVEYING111 UNIVERSITY DRIVE EAST, SUITE 215COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840(979) 485-2844 FAX (979) 485-2845TBPE F-4691JOHNSON& PACEwebsite: www.johnsonpace.comDRAWN BY: SCALE: APPROVED BY: JOB NO.: DATE: SHEET NO.:CAPROCK 311775 GREENS PRAIRIE ROADGREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PHASE 3, BLOCK 3,LOT 1 R AND A007601, A BABILLE A-76 (ICL),TRACT 5, 19.334 ACRESAPRIL 3, 2018 PB CAM EX 1 4289-001 1"=100'APPLICANT: PHILIP BARGASJOHNSON & PACE INCORPORATED111 UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 215COLLEGE STATION TEXAS, 77840979-485-284400 100'200' LEGEND PROPERTY LINE LOT LINES PROPOSED PUBLIC WAY APPROXIMATE DETENTION AREA APPROXIMATE OPEN SPACE APPROXIMATE BUFFER SPACE GENERAL COMMERCIAL MULTIFAMILY PARKING SHARED ACCESS 25' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER DEVELOPMENT DIVIDING LINE NOTE: ·RELOCATING EXISTING EASEMENTS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A PDDAMENDMENT. ·SITE IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN , AS SHOWN ON FEMA FIRM PANEL 48041C0325E ·THE SURFACE PARKING AREAS THROUGHOUT THE SITE WILL BE INTERCONNECTED SUCH THAT CROSS-ACCESS WILL BE AVAILABLEBETWEEN ALL USES AND TO THE PROPOSED PUBLIC WAY. ·BASE ZONING DISTRICT FOR PDD SHALL BE GC AND MF WHERE APPLICABLE. ·ALL SITE DRAINAGE WILL BE CAPTURED IN PROPOSED DETENTION/RETENTION PONDS. ALL DRAINAGE WILL MEET BCS UNITEDSTANDARDS. ·PROPOSED DETENTION/RETENTION WILL NOT IMPACT EXISTING UTILITIES. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1:400 SITE LOCATION 31.005 ACRES25' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER 1COMMENTS ADDRESSEDSKG5/10/2018EXISTING ZONING:RURAL AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSED ZONING:PDD TOTAL SITE AREA:31 ACRES LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:A007601, A BABILLE A-76 (ICL),TRACT 5, 19.334 ACRES & GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 3,BLOCK 3, LOT 1R (LESS 172' OF) PROPERTIES ARE NOT WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN ORFLOODWAY ACCORDING TO FEMA MAP 48041C0325E DATEDMAY 16, 2012 SITE INFORMATION DEVELOPER: CAPROCK TEXAS4519 MILLS PARK CIRCLE,SUITE 300COLLEGE STATION TEXAS,77845979-492-0425OWNER: APISPEDIGREE LPPO BOX 1709CASTROVILLE TEXAS, 78009 PDD Supplemental Standards GENERAL: The Concept Plan proposes a mix of Multi-Family and Commercial development with a base zoning of MF Multi-Family and GC General Commercial as shown on the Concept Plan. The stated purpose and intent of the requested PDD is “to create a dense, urban development that directly overlooks a large, common, centrally located greenspace/open space to create a distinctive destination that attracts people and encourages social interaction. Buildings and patios will front the open space, providing comfortable and relaxing views for residents, tenants and customers. The open space will be utilized by tenants, retail and restaurant customers and the general public, and will provide pedestrian connectivity through the site”. The Concept Plan proposes Multi-Family development that fronts Arrington Road and a future Public Way, with commercial uses located along Arrington Road and Greens Prairie Road fronting a common central open space. Buildings adjacent to the central open space will be a minimum of 2 stories tall, and will be subject to non-residential architectural requirements, with some minor modifications. A new Public Way is proposed to cross through the property, extending from Arrington Road through the development and connecting into Greens Prairie Road. COMMUNITY BENEFITS:  Sense of Place – Large, common, pedestrian-oriented open space for public use with vehicles and traffic concentrated away from pedestrian activity.  Connectivity – Pedestrian access will be provided to the open space with planned sidewalk connections to the various uses within the development.  Placemaking – Buildings and patios fronting onto the open space will create a distinctive destination that attracts people and encourages social interaction.  Sustainability –Provides a place to live, work, shop, and play. The goal is to create a development which offers amenities not necessarily found in every other development or neighborhood. The density of retail/office components in a walkable environment allow for the potential of office workers to walk to lunch or to shop. Furthermore, the Multi-Family units allow for the potential of employees to work and live in close proximity, which reduces automobile trips generated. MERITORIOUS MODIFICATIONS: The GC General Commercial zoning district for commercial uses and MF Multi-Family zoning district for the residential uses are the base zoning districts with a modified list of PDD Planned Development District development standards and uses as described in the sections below: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Unless expressly identified and referenced within this ordinance, this development is subject to the regulations of the Unified Development Ordinance as it exists or may be amended. Definitions: 1. Open Space Area– Any area of open space identified on the Concept Plan. 2. Primary Building Facade – The primary face of a building directly facing a Public Street, Public Way or an Open Space Area. Permitted Uses: 1. Bar/Tavern/Night Clubs are allowed by right in the areas designated as Multi-Family on the Concept Plan with the following restrictions: a. Bar/Tavern/Night Clubs shall meet all Code of Ordinance regulations, including not being located within 300 feet from a church, public hospital, public school as defined in the Code of Ordinances. b. Outdoor areas/patios or entrances to a Bar/Tavern/Night Clubs may not be located on the side of the building adjacent to single-family land use and/or zoning. c. Bar/Tavern/Night Clubs are only permitted when incorporated into the residential structure, up to a maximum of 50 percent of the total floor area. 2. To create a destination restaurant district with outdoor patio space overlooking the Open Space Area, Restaurants with a Drive-through are prohibited. Off-Street Parking: 1. In the areas designated as General Commercial on the Concept Plan, parking shall not be located between the buildings and the Open Space Area as shown on the Concept Plan. 2. Shared Parking is permitted in areas designated as General Commercial on the Concept Plan based on the following conditions: a. Mixed Use Shared Parking Agreement: Up to fifty (50) percent of the parking spaces required for a theater or other place of evening entertainment (after 6:00 P.M.), may be provided and used jointly by banks, offices, and similar uses not normally open, used, or operated during evening hours if specifically approved on a Site Plan or Final Plat. b. Proper pedestrian access is provided such that pedestrians can access both uses within an acceptable distance and that such access is provided safely and conveniently to both uses. c. Off-street parking spaces may be located on a remote and separate lot from the lot on which the principal use is located, given the off-street parking spaces are located no farther than five hundred (500) feet from the building site. The Administrator may waive this distance limitation, if adequate assurances are offered regarding the usability of the shared lot and the principle use (such as the operation of a van or shuttle service, etc.). d. Shared-parking areas shall be considered accessory uses of principal uses that the parking spaces are intended to serve. Shared parking areas shall require the same or a more intensive zoning classification than that required for the most intensive of the uses served by the shared parking area. e. A shared parking plan shall be enforced through written agreement among the owners of record. An attested copy of the agreement shall be submitted to the County Clerk's office for recordation on forms made available in the Department of Development Services. Proof of recordation of the agreement shall be presented to the Administrator prior to issuance of a Building Permit. If a shared parking agreement is revoked by the parties to the agreement, either off-street parking must be provided pursuant to Section 7.3. – Off- Street Parking Standards or an Alternative Parking Plan must be approved by the Administrator. Signs: 1. Attached Sign –Attached Signs on any commercial building or tenant lease space shall not exceed a total of two and one-half (2.5) square feet per linear foot of all public entry façades, with a maximum of seven hundred fifty (750) square feet of Attached Signage allowed for any one (1) tenant. Attached Signs may be cantilevered away from the structure so long as the sign does not project more than three (3) feet from the connecting façade. An attached sign: a. Shall advertise only the name of, uses of, or goods or services available within the development; b. Can be parallel or perpendicular to the face of the building; c. Shall not be attached to any tree or public utility pole. d. Attached Signs may be mounted to site lighting poles located on private property and may be constructed of cloth, canvas, or other flexible material provided such signage is maintained in good condition and complies with the following restrictions: e. No part of any sign attached to a light pole will be allowed to overhang or encroach into any portion of the public right-of-way f. Light pole signs shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet in area and shall have a minimum of eight (8) feet of clearance from the grade below; g. Light pole signs shall only be attached to one (1) side of a light pole; h. Light pole signs shall not project more than three (3) feet from the edge of the light pole; and i. Light pole signs constructed of cloth, canvas, or other flexible material shall be secured on a minimum of two (2) opposing sides to prevent wind-driven movement. 2. Free-Standing Multi-Tenant Signs (FSMTS) – FSMTSs shall be permitted in the two locations shown on the Sign Plan Exhibit. 3. Subdivision Sign (SS) – Subdivision Sign shown as “SS” on the Sign Plan Exhibit shall be no greater than two hundred (200) square feet in area and no greater than twenty (20) feet in height and must be set back at least twenty (20) feet from the back of curb. 4. Wayfinding Sign – Wayfinding Signs shall be submitted as part of a sign package for the development. These Wayfinding Signs shall in no case be greater than fifty (50) square feet in area or greater than six (6) feet in height. All Wayfinding Signs shall be internal to the development. Non-Residential Architectural Standards: 1. Façade Terms a. Primary Façade – A façade is considered to be a "primary façade" when it is the primary entrance façade of a primary building (not accessory buildings) or when any façade of a primary building is facing a public right-of-way, private right-of-way, public way, or Open Space Area as shown on the Concept Plan. 2. Building Mass and Design a. Horizontal Façade Articulation – For all properties within this PDD the vertical wall plane of any façade visible from public right-of-way, street, or public way shall project and/or recess by a minimum of two (2) feet so that no more than sixty-six (66) percent of the façade is on the same plane. 3. Building Entry Design a. Buildings that have multiple ground floor tenants or multiple primary building entrances shall have all entrances treated architecturally, unless the entrances are for service or maintenance areas. 4. Architectural Relief a. In order to provide visual interest, the first two (2) stories of any primary façade or façade visible from a public right-of-way or public way shall use at least one (1) architectural relief element for every fifty (50) horizontal feet, or part thereof, of façade length. b. The design elements may be grouped or spaced as needed along the façade, though in no case shall more than one hundred (100) feet of continuous horizontal length be void of a relief element. c. Architectural relief is not required for façades, or parts of a façade, that are within twenty (20) feet of another building that screens the façade. 5. Qualifying Architectural Relief Elements a. In addition to the architectural relief elements permitted for property zoned GC General Commercial as outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance as it exists or may be amended, the following types of architectural relief may be utilized to meet the requirements of this Section: 1) Covered front porch extending along at least fifty (50) percent of building façade and projecting a minimum of four (4) feet from the face of the building, if used on a façade where this feature is not already required; 2) Eaves in excess of eighteen (18) inches, if used on a façade that does not have a covered front porch; 3) Transom windows; 4) Recessed entries, stoops, porches, or arcades; 5) Cornices, corbelling, quoining, or stringcourses; 6) Other architectural relief elements that provide a visual interest to the affected façade and are of a physical scale to possess architectural significance may be approved by the Administrator. 6. Other Mass and Design Requirements a. For all properties within this PDD – Loading docks, overhead doors and service entries shall not face the Open Space Areas or a public right-of-way. These areas may be located on a façade facing a public way. In the case that more than two (2) façades face a public right-of-way, the Administrator shall determine the most appropriate façade for such activities. 7. Building Materials a. The following minimum amount of fired brick, natural stone, marble, granite, tile or any concrete product so long as it has an integrated color and is textured or patterned (not aggregate material) to simulate brick, stone, marble, or granite shall be provided: 1) A minimum of ten (10) percent on any façade visible from a public right-of-way, public way or Open Space Area as shown on the Concept Plan; 2) Painted metal panel siding is allowed without limitation on a rear façade of a building when the façade is not visible from a right-of-way, public way parkland, greenway, residential area or Open Space Area. Subdivision Design and Improvements: 1. A Street Projection shall not be required to the adjacent single-family property along the southern boundary of the property. 2. Block Length and Block Perimeter shall be provided as shown on the Concept Plan. Usable Open Space Requirements: 1. Any future Parkland Dedication of privately owned Open Space will require City Council approval of an amendment to the Concept Plan. 2. Buildings shall be oriented towards the Open Space Area(s) as shown on the Concept Plan. 3. The Open Space shown on the Concept Plan is the minimum required open space for the project, and shall consist of no less than 2.25 acres. 4. When a site plan is submitted for a property adjacent to an Open Space Area, the Open Space Area shall be improved as open space. 5. Open Space Areas shall be developed and maintained urban and/or passive open spaces incorporating, at a minimum, the following improvements: a. Urban Plaza Open Space: • Decorative pedestrian paving • Lighting, including pedestrian lighting • Benches and other seating areas • Landscaping and hardscaping, including shade trees • Pedestrian crosswalks at intersections • Sidewalks (minimum six feet in width) b. Passive Open Space: • Pedestrian trail and sidewalks (minimum six feet in width) • Lighting, including pedestrian lighting • Benches and other seating areas • Landscaping and hardscaping, including shade trees • Pedestrian crosswalks at intersections • Outdoor Dining/Picnic area 6. The following improvements are permitted, but not required, in the Open Space Areas: • Any area maintained in a natural state. • An amphitheater. • Plazas. • Gardens. • Pavilions and gazebos. • Art Sculptures and Water features, including fountains and ponds. • Tennis facility and other similar athletic facilities. • Trash receptacles, bike racks, and other similar improvements. • Any other similar improvement approved by the Director of Development Services. 7. A minimum of two (2) pedestrian connections to the Open Space Areas shall be provided through the areas designated General Commercial on the Concept Plan. 8. Buildings Fronting Open Space Area: a. Buildings must be a minimum two stories. Retail and Restaurant buildings may be one story, but must have a minimum building height of 30 feet. b. If required by the City's Fire Code, buildings fronting an Open Space Area shall include an emergency access fire lane between the building and the Open Space Area. 9. Any retention and/or detention shall be designed such that no fences/barriers are required unless the public safety and welfare requires it. Encroachments: 1. The following portions of a building containing non-residential uses may encroach into required Building Setbacks adjacent to the Open Space Area(s): eaves, roof extensions, porches, terraces, steps, attached signs, lighting fixtures, railing, balconies, canopies, awnings, window sills, belt courses, cornices, outdoor seating areas, patios, sidewalk cafes, plazas, water features and similar improvements approved by the Director of Development Services. 60.0 '25.0'60.0'Arrington Road Greens Prairie Road OPEN SPACE RETENTION POND MULTIFAMILY ALLOWED USE: BAR/ TAVERN/ NIGHT CLUB OPEN SPACE 2.6 0 - A C R E P U B L I C W A Y DETENTION POND GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL DETENTION POND MULTIFAMILY ALLOWED USE: BAR/ TAVERN/ NIGHTCLUB SIDEWALKS WILLIAM D. FITCH PKWY ARRINGTON ROADST A T E H I G H W A Y 6 GREENS PRAIRIE ROADTHIS DRAWING AND RELATED SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING ALL DOCUMENTS ON ELECTRONIC MEDIA, WERE PREPARED BY JOHNSON AND PACE INCORPORATED (JPI) AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF JPI. THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE USED ONLY BY THE CLIENT TO WHOM SERVICES ARE RENDERED AND ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DESCRIBING, CONSTRUCTING, OR INSTALLING THEWORK SHOWN HEREON AT THE DESIGNATED LOCATION ON THE SPECIFIED SITE. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION REPRODUCTION OR ALTERATION, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND SHALL CAUSE THE WAIVER OF ANY EXPRESSED WARRANTIES AND ALSO SEVER ANY LIABILITIES WHICH MAY ARISE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION, USE OR RESULT OF SUCH UNAUTHORIZED USE OR CHANGES.Copyright © 2011, Johnson & Pace IncorporatedDATEBYDESCRIPTIONNO.REVISIONSENGINEERING ▪ ARCHITECTURE ▪ SURVEYING111 UNIVERSITY DRIVE EAST, SUITE 215COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840(979) 485-2844 FAX (979) 485-2845TBPE F-4691JOHNSON& PACEwebsite: www.johnsonpace.comDRAWN BY: SCALE: APPROVED BY: JOB NO.: DATE: SHEET NO.:CAPROCK 311775 GREENS PRAIRIE ROADGREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PHASE 3, BLOCK 3,LOT 1 R AND A007601, A BABILLE A-76 (ICL),TRACT 5, 19.334 ACRESAPRIL 3, 2018 PB CAM EX 1 4289-001 1"=100'APPLICANT: PHILIP BARGASJOHNSON & PACE INCORPORATED111 UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 215COLLEGE STATION TEXAS, 77840979-485-284400 100'200' LEGEND PROPERTY LINE LOT LINES PROPOSED PUBLIC WAY APPROXIMATE DETENTION AREA APPROXIMATE OPEN SPACE APPROXIMATE BUFFER SPACE GENERAL COMMERCIAL MULTIFAMILY PARKING SHARED ACCESS 25' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER DEVELOPMENT DIVIDING LINE NOTE: ·RELOCATING EXISTING EASEMENTS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A PDDAMENDMENT. ·SITE IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN , AS SHOWN ON FEMA FIRM PANEL 48041C0325E ·THE SURFACE PARKING AREAS THROUGHOUT THE SITE WILL BE INTERCONNECTED SUCH THAT CROSS-ACCESS WILL BE AVAILABLEBETWEEN ALL USES AND TO THE PROPOSED PUBLIC WAY. ·BASE ZONING DISTRICT FOR PDD SHALL BE GC AND MF WHERE APPLICABLE. ·ALL SITE DRAINAGE WILL BE CAPTURED IN PROPOSED DETENTION/RETENTION PONDS. ALL DRAINAGE WILL MEET BCS UNITEDSTANDARDS. ·PROPOSED DETENTION/RETENTION WILL NOT IMPACT EXISTING UTILITIES. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1:400 SITE LOCATION 31.005 ACRES25' WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER 1COMMENTS ADDRESSEDSKG5/10/2018EXISTING ZONING:RURAL AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSED ZONING:PDD TOTAL SITE AREA:31 ACRES LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:A007601, A BABILLE A-76 (ICL),TRACT 5, 19.334 ACRES & GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER PH 3,BLOCK 3, LOT 1R (LESS 172' OF) PROPERTIES ARE NOT WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN ORFLOODWAY ACCORDING TO FEMA MAP 48041C0325E DATEDMAY 16, 2012 SITE INFORMATION DEVELOPER: CAPROCK TEXAS4519 MILLS PARK CIRCLE,SUITE 300COLLEGE STATION TEXAS,77845979-492-0425OWNER: APISPEDIGREE LPPO BOX 1709CASTROVILLE TEXAS, 78009 June 7, 2018 Regular Agenda Rezoning – Aurora Court To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Jade Broadnax, Staff Planner Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from GS General Suburban to D Duplex for approximately 4.7 acres of land located at 400, 401, 404, 405, 408, 409, 412, 413, 416, 417, 500, 501, 504, 505, 508, 509, 512, and 513 Aurora Court. Case #REZ2018-000007. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. Summary: This request is amending the zoning district boundaries on the property to rezone approximately 4.7 acres from GS General Suburban to D Duplex. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is located within the Redmond Terrace Subdivision, Area 1 in the Southside Area Neighborhood Plan, with a Future Land Use and Character designation of Urban. This area saw a change in designation in its northern boundary due to the large lot size of the properties in close proximity to George Bush Drive. Those properties changed designation from General Suburban to Neighborhood Conservation, while the subject area remained an Urban designation due to its proximity to higher density development areas. The Urban land use designation is generally for areas that should have a very intense level of development activities. These areas will tend to consist of townhomes, duplexes, and high-density apartments. The proposed zoning district D duplex would allow for the development of low to medium density residential uses with a maximum density of 12.0 dwelling units per acre. The proposed zoning district is consistent with the Southside Area Neighborhood Plan, which was adopted as part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The surrounding area is currently zoned GS General Suburban, R-6 High Density Multifamily, and PDD Planned Development District and has a variety of existing land uses. The subject property itself is zoned General Suburban but is made up of non-conforming duplexes. Across Anderson Street (a major collector) to the east there are existing high density residential apartments. Adjacent to the west are generally low density detached single family houses. North of the subject property is Oakwood Middle School, and south of the property is a church. The proposed zoning district D Duplex would allow for the development of low to medium density residential uses with a maximum density of 12 dwelling units per acre. The area surrounding Aurora Court currently provides a diversity of housing types and compatible public and civic uses like Oakwood Middle School, A&M Consolidated Middle School, and a church. The proposed D Duplex zoning designation would allow for the preservation of the existing duplex uses on the subject properties and continue to provide a transitional density from lower density GS General Suburban single family development to the west that allows a maximum 8 dwelling units per acre to the R-6 High Density Multi-Family residential development (across Anderson Street) to the east that allows for a maximum 30 dwelling units per acre. Given the existing density of residential uses in the area and the surrounding public and civic uses, the proposed rezoning to D Duplex is appropriate and compatible with the existing context of the surrounding area. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: As there are existing duplexes located on the property, it is physically suitable for the proposed D Duplex zoning district. The applicant is proposing to rezone 18 lots, each of which, as currently platted, meet the required minimum 3,500 square foot lot size per dwelling unit, and 60 foot lot width with approved rear or side yard parking in the D Duplex zoning district. Each lot has individual driveway access from Aurora Court. The proposed D Duplex zoning district is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, storm water, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: Water and sanitary sewer service will be provided by CSU. There is an existing 4- inch water line and an existing 6-inch sanitary sewer line adjacent to this development within the Aurora Court right-of -way. The 6" sanitary sewer line servicing this area has been identified for replacement and up-sizing by the City’s Wastewater Master Plan though the project is currently unscheduled and unfunded. If a major construction project for this area is proposed, the city may be interested in participating financially for the coordinated up-sizing of this line. Currently, there is adequate capacity in the water and sanitary sewer system to serve the existing development, but upsizing of sanitary sewer line may be required depending on the intensity of future development and projected sewer demands within the D Duplex zoning district. The sites have access to Aurora Court, an existing local street. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. 5. The marketability of the property: The subject properties are currently zoned GS General Suburban and are presently non-conforming duplex uses. The desired future use of the property is duplex. Due to the nonconforming status through this area, the properties are less marketable as currently zoned than if rezoned for a duplex use, which allows for the existing structures to be rebuilt as duplexes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Background Information 2. Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 3. Application 4. Rezoning Exhibit 5. Rezoning Map NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 7, 2018 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: June 28, 2018 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Wolf Pen Creek HOA Property owner notices mailed: Twenty (20) Contacts in support: None at the time of staff report. Contacts in opposition: None at the time of staff report. Inquiry contacts: None at the time of staff report. ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Institutional/Public & Urban GS General Suburban & PDD Planned Development District Educational Facility – Primary and Secondary & Multifamily South Urban GS General Suburban Place of Worship East (across Anderson St) Urban R-6 High Density Multifamily Multifamily West Neighborhood Conservation GS General Suburban Single-Family Residential DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1956 Zoning: R-1 upon annexation R-1 renamed to GS General Suburban in 2013. Final Plat: 1972 Site development: Property is presently developed with one duplex on each of the 18 lots. Name of Project:AURORA COURT Address:401 AURORA CT Legal Description:LITTLE KNIGHT, LOT 18 Total Acreage:4.649 Applicant:: Property Owner:AURORA GARDENS GROUP RME Consulting Engineers List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. Existing use is Duplex and existing zoning is GS. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. Yes. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? Same as "Rezoning Suitability". Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. Compliance with existing use and rental property is desirable within close proximity to TAMU campus. REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Compliance with existing use and rental property is desirable within close proximity to TAMU campus. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Same as "Rezoning Suitability". List any other reasons to support this zone change. n/a Page 2 of 2