Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/22/2010 - Regular Agenda Packet - City CouncilTable of Contents Agenda 4 2b - Heil Environmental/Heil of Texas Settlement & Release of Liability Coversheet revised 9 Copy of Settlement Agreement and Release of Liability 10 2c - Royder Road and Greens Prairie Trail Improvements Design Contract Project Number ST1037 Coversheet revised 13 Location Map 14 Resolution 15 2d - Community Development PY 2010 – 2014 Consolidated Plan and FY 2011 (PY 2010) Action Plan and Budget Coversheet revised 16 Attachment 1 - FY 2011 Community Development Budget Summary 18 Attachment 2 - Consolidated Plan and Budget Development Process Summary 19 Attachment 3 - FY 2011 CDBG Public Service Funding Summary and Recommendations 20 Attachment 4 - FY 2011 CDBG Public Facility Funding Summary and Recommendations 21 Attachment 5 - PY 2010 - 2014 Community Development Goals 22 Attachment 7 - Resolution for PY 2010 - 2014 Consolidated Plan 24 Attachment 8 - Resolution for FY 2011 Annual Action Plan and Budget 25 Attachment 6 - Comments on Proposed PY 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan and FY 2011 Annual Action Plan and Budget 27 2e - Revised Ordinance – Chapter 10 Traffic Code Related to Parking Regulations in Residential Areas Coversheet revised 28 Chapter 10 Section 6 Amended Ordinance 29 Chapter 10 Section 6 Current Ordinance 32 2f - Municipal Irrigation Water Use Report Coversheet revised 34 Water Use Report June 10 35 2g - Authorization to Disburse Grant Funding to Reynolds and Reynolds, Inc. Coversheet revised 41 Statement of Compliance - Reynolds and Reynolds - 2009 42 2h - Resolution authorizing a Development Agreement with CVCS LLC and an Advance Funding Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation Coversheet revised 44 1 Resolution 45 2i - Construction Contract for the Hike & Bike Trail Completion Project Coversheet revised 82 Location Map 83 Resolution 84 Bid Tabulation 85 2j - Banner Resolution for Copy Corner Coversheet revised 89 Banner Dimensions 90 Banner Details 91 Site Plan 92 Resolution 93 No. 1 - Capital Project Funding Presentation Coversheet revised 94 GO List 2010 95 CO Lisht 2010 96 No. 2 - Appeal of Variance Request Denial by the Cemetery Committee Related to Monument Size Restrictions Coversheet Cemetery Monument Appeal revised 97 1 - Appeal letter from Reynolds 98 2 - October 12, 2009 Cemetery Minutes 100 3 - November 10 2009 Cemetery Minutes 104 4 - June 8 2010 Cemetery Minutes 108 No. 3 - ST-0505 Tauber and Stasney Street Rehabilitation Project Public Hearing Coversheet revised 111 Location Map 112 No. 4 - Jones-Butler Extension (ST0905)Design Contract Public Hearing Coversheet revised 113 Location Map 114 No. 5 - Barron Road Widening Phase 2 Pre-Bid Presentation Coversheet revised 115 Location Map 116 No. 6 - Rezoning for Spring Creek Retail & Office Coversheet revised 117 Background 122 Maps 123 Draft P&Z Meeting Minutes 125 Ordinance 127 No. 7 - Rezoning for Spring Creek Garden Coversheet revised 133 Background 137 Maps 138 Ordinance 140 2 No. 8 - 103 Fairview Ave – Public Utility Easement Abandonment Coversheet revised 147 Vicinity Map 148 Location Map 149 Ordinance 150 Ordinance Exhibit 152 No. 9 - Medical Corridor Committees Coversheet Medical Corridor Committees revised 154 3 Mayor Council members Nancy Berry Jess Fields Mayor Pro Tem Dennis Maloney John Crompton Katy-Marie Lyles City Manager Dave Ruesink Glenn Brown Agenda College Station City Council Regular Meeting Thursday, July 22, 2010 at 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chamber, 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Pledge of Allegiance, Invocation, Consider absence request. Hear Visitors: A citizen may address the City Council on any item which does not appear on the posted Agenda. Registration forms are available in the lobby and at the desk of the City Secretary. This form should be completed and delivered to the City Secretary by 5:30 pm. Please limit remarks to three minutes. A timer alarm will sound after 2 1/2 minutes to signal thirty seconds remaining to conclude your remarks. The City Council will receive the information, ask staff to look into the matter, or place the issue on a future agenda. Topics of operational concerns shall be directed to the City Manager. Comments should not personally attack other speakers, Council or staff. Consent Agenda Individuals who wish to address the City Council on a consent or regular agenda item not posted as a public hearing shall register with the City Secretary prior to the Mayor’s reading of the agenda item. Registration forms are available in the lobby and at the desk of the City Secretary. The Mayor will recognize individuals who wish to come forward to speak for or against the item. The speaker will state their name and address for the record and allowed three minutes. A timer will sound at 2 1/2 minutes to signal thirty seconds remaining for remarks. 2. Presentation, possible action and discussion of consent agenda items which consists of ministerial or "housekeeping" items required by law. Items may be removed from the consent agenda by majority vote of the Council. a. Presentation, possible action, and discussion of minutes for July 8, 2010 Workshop and Regular Meetings. b. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a claim and release of liability settlement between the City of College Station and The Heil Company dba Heil Environmental and Heil of Texas, Inc., related to repair of Heil Sanitation Truck fleet number 72-24, following a fire on April 16, 2010. c. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a resolution approving award of a Professional Services Contract for the design of the Royder Road and Greens Prairie Trail Improvements to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in the amount of $96,400. 4 City Council Regular Meeting Page 2 Thursday, July 22, 2010 d. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the approval of a resolution adopting the City’s proposed PY 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan and FY 2010 Annual Action Plan and Budget. e. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding modifications and revisions to Chapter 10 “Traffic Code”, Section 6 (A) “Definitions” and 6 (B) “Regulations” as it relates to parking, standing or storing of trailers in residential areas. Item has been pulled f. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the monthly report on irrigation water use at City of College Station facilities and properties. g. Presentation, possible action, and discussion authorizing the payment of Retention and Expansion and Payroll Grants in a total amount of $40,000 to Reynolds and Reynolds, Inc. h. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on entering into the following two items: 1. a development agreement between the City of College Station and CVCS, LLC for design of and payment for temporary construction access from Harvey Mitchell Parkway to the Campus Village development; and 2. a resolution for an Advanced Funding Agreement (AFA) between the City of College Station and Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for city contributions to transportation improvement project to wit: a temporary construction access from Harvey Mitchell Parkway to the Campus Village development. i. Presentation, possible action, and discussion approving a resolution awarding a construction contract to Brazos Valley Services in the amount of $536,205.36 for the Hike & Bike Trail Completion project along FM 2818. j. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Resolution authorizing banners for Copy Corner recognizing the Wind Watts program Regular Agenda Individuals who wish to address the City Council on a regular agenda item not posted as a public hearing shall register with the City Secretary prior to the Mayor’s reading of the agenda item. The Mayor will recognize you to come forward to speak for or against the item. The speaker will state their name and address for the record and allowed three minutes. A timer will sound at 2 1/2 minutes to signal thirty seconds remaining for remarks. Individuals who wish to address the City Council on an item posted as a public hearing shall register with the City Secretary prior to the Mayor’s announcement to open the public hearing. The Mayor will recognize individuals who wish to come forward to speak for or against the item. The speaker will state their name and address for the record and allowed three minutes. A timer alarm will sound at 2 1/2 minutes to signal thirty seconds remaining to conclude remarks. After a public hearing is closed, there shall be no additional public comments. If Council needs additional information from the general public, some limited comments may be allowed at the discretion of the Mayor. If an individual does not wish to address the City Council, but still wishes to be recorded in the official minutes as being in support or opposition to an agenda item, the individual may complete the registration form provided in the lobby by providing the name, address, and comments about a city related subject. These comments will be referred to the City Council and City Manager. 5 City Council Regular Meeting Page 3 Thursday, July 22, 2010 1. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on capital project funding for the City of College Station. 2. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding an appeal by Ken and Kimberly Reynolds to the City Council on a variance request denied by the Cemetery Committee for the placement of a monument exceeding size restrictions in the College Station Cemetery. 3. Public Hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion concerning approval to proceed with bidding for improvements to Tauber and Stasney Streets from University Drive to Cherry Street. 4. Public Hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion concerning approval to proceed with engineering services for the extension of Jones-Butler from Luther Street to George Bush Drive. 5. Public Hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion concerning approval to advertise the Barron Road Widening Phase 2 Project for construction bids. 6. Public Hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance”, Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, specifically rezoning for Spring Creek Retail and Office Center from A- O, Agricultural Open to PDD, Planned Development District for 5 acres located at 1850 William D. Fitch Parkway. 7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance”, Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, specifically rezoning for a portion of Lot 1, Block 3 and a portion of Lots 34-36, Block 2 of the Spring Creek Garden Subdivision from A-P Administrative Professional and R-1 Single Family Residential to PDD, Planned Development District for 0.8625 acres located East of the intersection of Candace Court and Decatur Drive. 8. Public Hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion approving an ordinance vacating and abandoning 12.5 feet (1,679.7 square feet) of a 20-foot wide public utility easement, which is located on Lot 1R of Block 2A of the College Park Subdivision according to the plat recorded in Volume 8582, Page 96 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. 9. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the formation of two committees to assist with the Medical Corridor project. 10. Council Calendar July 23-24 TML Newly Elected Officials Conference in Irving July 24 Ribbon Cutting Celebration-Pleasant Grove Baptist Church at Pleasant Grove Baptist Church-1216 Detroit Street, 2:00 p.m. August 1 Opening Ceremonies for the USA/ASA Girls 16 & Under "A" Fast Pitch National Tournament at Wold Pen Creek Amphitheater, 6:15 p.m. August 3 Town Hall Meetings with City Councilman Jess Fields at Conference Center, 7:30 p.m. August 5 Planning & Zoning Meeting in Council Chambers, 6:00 p.m. August 11 CSISD New Employee Luncheon at Pebble Creek Country Club, 11:45 a.m. August 11 Council Budget Workshop in Council Chambers, 3:00 p.m. August 12 Council Workshop/Regular Meeting in Council Chambers, 3:00 & 7:00 p.m. 6 City Council Regular Meeting Page 4 Thursday, July 22, 2010 11. Executive Session will immediately follow the workshop meeting in the Administrative Conference Room. Consultation with Attorney {Gov’t Code Section 551.071}; possible action. The City Council may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending or contemplated litigation subject or settlement offer or attorney-client privileged information. Litigation is an ongoing process and questions may arise as to a litigation tactic or settlement offer, which needs to be discussed with the City Council. Upon occasion the City Council may need information from its attorney as to the status of a pending or contemplated litigation subject or settlement offer or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. The following subject(s) may be discussed: Litigation a. City of Bryan’s application with TCEQ for water & sewer permits in Westside/Highway 60 area, near Brushy Water Supply Corporation to decertify City of College Station and certify City of Bryan b. City of Bryan suit filed against College Station, Legal issues and advise on Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency contract, on proposed methane gas contract c. Water CCN / 2002 Annexation / Wellborn Water Supply Corporation d. Weingarten Realty Investors v. College Station, Ron Silvia, David Ruesink, Lynn McIlhaney, and Ben White e. Chavers et al v. Tyrone Morrow, Michael Ikner, City of Bryan, City of College Station, et al f. Clancey v. College Station, Glenn Brown, and Kathy Merrill Legal Advice a. Discussion of Legal Issues Regarding: Wellborn Incorporation Request b. Contemplated Litigation, Legal remedies available to abate weeds, rubbish, brush and other unsanitary matter from a lot in the College Hills residential area. 12. Adjourn. If litigation issues arise to the posted subject matter of this Council Meeting an executive session will be held. APPROVED: ________________________________ City Manager Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas will be held on the Thursday, July 22, 2010 at 6:00 PM at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this 19th day of July, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. E-Signed by Connie Hooks VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt ________________________________ City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Governing Body of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said 7 City Council Regular Meeting Page 5 Thursday, July 22, 2010 notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City’s website, www.cstx.gov . The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on July 19, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours proceeding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: __________________________ by ________________________. Dated this _____day of ________________, 2010 By______________________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the _____day of ________________, 2010. ______________________________ Notary Public – Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: ___________ The building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.gov . Council meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. 8 July 22, 2010 Consent Agenda Item Number 2b Heil Environmental/Heil of Texas Settlement & Release of Liability To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Alison Pond, Human Resources Director Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the release of liability on The Heil Company dba Heil Environmental and Heil of Texas, Inc.; and settlement between the City of College Station and Heil related to repair of City-owned Heil Sanitation Truck fleet number 72-24, following a fire on April 16, 2010. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Goal I.1 Spending taxpayer money efficiently Recommendation(s): The City of College Station Risk Management Department recommends approval of the settlement agreement and a full release of liability on Heil as shown in the attached release. The City of College Station Legal Department has reviewed, amended, and approved the release. Summary: A City-owned Heil Sanitation Truck (2008 model: original cost @$223,706.00) burned April 16, 2010. Risk Management requested a Fire Marshall investigation as to cause. The investigation included Fire Marshall Raymond Olsen and Safety Officer Dwayne Walters. A defective fitting was determined to have contributed significantly to the fire. Risk Management, with the Fleet Department and Public Works, presented evidence to Heil of Texas along with a request for Heil’s participation in the cost of repair. Heil of Texas Representative John Davis forwarded the information to Heil Environmental. Heil’s response to our request for their participation in the repair is as follows: Original damage estimate: $106,844.57, including parts, labor, freight. Includes all new parts including cab assembly; no after-market parts. Final proposed settlement: · Heil Environmental to pay $62,149.94 · Heil of Texas to pay $6,188.07 · The City to pay $38,506.56 parts including cab assembly, core and freight · Responsibility split: Heil 58.2%, Heil of Texas 5.8%, City of College Station 36% Budget & Financial Summary: Funds are available in the FY10 budget in the Property/Casualty Fund to pay the City’s portion of the repair cost. Attachments: 1. Copy of Settlement Agreement and Release of Liability 9 10 11 12 July 22, 2010 Consent Agenda Item No. 2c Royder Road and Greens Prairie Trail Improvements Design Contract Project Number ST1037 To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Chuck Gilman, Director of Capital Projects Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a resolution approving award of a Professional Services Contract for the design of the Royder Road and Greens Prairie Trail Improvements to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in the amount of $96,400. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Goal I, Financially Sustainable City Providing Response to Core Services and Infrastructure. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this professional services contract. Summary: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. was contacted to submit a proposal for designing the project based upon their experience of designing the Greens Prairie Elementary School site (grading, drainage, parking, driveways, streets on the school site, and utilities), and their prior experience of designing other roadway projects similar in size and scope to this project. College Station ISD (CSISD) is presently constructing Greens Prairie Elementary School located on the southwest corner of Royder Road. The elementary school is scheduled to open in August 2011. Royder Road south of Greens Prairie Trail is an existing 2-lane asphalt and gravel road, and will provide access to staff parking and the bus entrance at the elementary school. The driveway for the student drop-off will be located off Greens Prairie Trail. The school district completed a traffic impact analysis (TIA) as part of the design of the new facility. The TIA recommended minimal improvements to Royder and Greens Prairie Trail. However, CSID intends to improve Royder Road to provide reliable access to site. Additionally, the Unified Development Ordinance requires that CSISD construct a deceleration lane along Greens Prairie Trail to help facilitate traffic into the site. In addition to the improvements planned by the school district, Staff feels a dedicated left turn into the site for westbound traffic along Greens Prairie Trail is necessary to ensure that vehicles turning left into the school do not adversely impact the flow of traffic along Greens Prairie Trail. Budget & Financial Summary: The current budget for this project is $1,000,000.00. No funds have been spent or encumbered to date. The P.O. for the project design is $96,400. Attachments: 1.) Project Map 2.) Resolution 13 ROYDER F M 2 1 5 4 WOODLAKE G R E E N S P R A I R I E CALUMET F R I E R S O N I & G N RIVA RIDGE GUS ROY L E D G E S T O N E P 1 -7 3 5 S W E E T W A T E R T R I P L E B E N D B R I G H T W A T E R D E R B Y C I R C I T A T I O N C R FLAGSTONE CR ROYDER RD G R E E N S P R A I R I E T R C R E E K M E A D O W B L V D N WOOD BROOK LN T I M B E R C R E E K L N 1 inch = 1,000 feet $ Royder Road Royder Road Project Location Map Legend Royder Road Improvements 14 15 July 22, 2010 Consent Agenda Item No. 2d Community Development PY 2010 – 2014 Consolidated Plan and FY 2011 (PY 2010) Action Plan and Budget To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: David Gwin, Director of Economic and Community Development Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the approval of a resolution adopting the City’s proposed PY 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan and FY 2010 Annual Action Plan and Budget. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Goal I.5 Develop revenue streams independent of the General Fund; Goal II. 1 Preserving and restoring older neighborhoods; Goal III. 12 Housing affordability Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of a resolution adopting the proposed Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan and Budget, authorizing new allocations and expenditure of remaining balances, and for the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. Summary: The action requested is approval of a resolution adopting the proposed PY 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan and FY 2011 Annual Action Plan and Budget as presented at the June 24, 2010 Council Meeting. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires the Plan and Budget be received by August 16th, therefore approval is required on this agenda to meet the required application deadline. Amounts available in the coming year include $1,229,074 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, $713,634 in HOME Investment Partnership Grant (HOME) funds, and various carry-over amounts from previous grant allocations. Council reviewed the draft PY 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan and FY2011 Annual Action Plan and Budget at its June 22nd meeting. A public comment period has been completed and comments received are included in the Plan. The Plans were developed with input received from a series of public hearings, program committee meetings, needs assessment studies, and citizen surveys. Plan goals and objectives were developed in accordance with the Department’s Strategic Business Plan to best meet the unique needs of lower-income citizens, and to provide support for families working towards self-sufficiency. Each year, the City must submit to HUD an Action Plan that includes descriptions of projects and activities to be carried out with grant funding. The proposed Annual Action Plan and Budget were developed in accordance with all applicable grant requirements and are now being presented for approval. CDBG and HOME funds may only be used to: (1) benefit low- and moderate-income persons; (2) aid in the elimination of slum and blight, and/or; (3) meet an urgent need. The City has traditionally used these funds for a variety of activities, including: affordable housing programs (homebuyer assistance, security deposit assistance, rehabilitation, replacement housing, new construction, and minor repairs); funding of direct services to low-income families; acquisition; demolition; code enforcement; commercial rehabilitation; and park, street, infrastructure and public facility improvements in low-income areas of the City. 16 Budget & Financial Summary: See attached financial summaries for the proposed FY 2010 Budget for CDBG and HOME funds. Staff will be prepared to answer questions regarding the proposed PY 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan and FY 2011 Plan and Budget. Attachments: 1. Proposed FY 2011 Community Development Budget Summary 2. Plan Development Process Summary 3. Proposed FY 2011 Public Service Funding Recommendations 4. Proposed FY 2011 Public Facility Funding Recommendations 5. FY 2010 Community Development Goals 6. Comments on Proposed PY 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan and FY 2011 Annual Action Plan and Budget 7. Resolution for PY 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan 8. Resolution for FY 2011 Annual Action Plan and Budget 17 Attachment 1: FY 2011 Proposed Community Development Budget PROJECT CDBG & HOME CARRY-OVER CDBG & HOME NEW ALLOCATIONS CDBG & HOME TOTAL PROPOSED Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation $122,159 $0 $122,159 Demolition $10,000 $0 $10,000 Acquisition $350,410 $0 $350,410 Interim Assistance $5,000 $0 $5,000 Homebuyer Assistance $23,830 $179,988 $203,818 CHDO $448,532 $107,045 $555,577 New Construction $361,748 $280,238 $641,986 Housing Services $0 $30,000 $30,000 Code Enforcement (PDS) $20,584 $68,100 $88,684 Code Enforcement (ECD) $36,899 $0 $36,899 Tenant Based Rental Assistance $16,566 $75,000 $91,566 CHDO Operating Expenses $87,585 $0 $87,585 Public Service Agency (See Attachment 3) $0 $164,094 $164,094 Public Facility (See Attachment 4) $44,439 $770,229 $814,668 Grant Administration $0 $268,014 $268,014 CDBG &HOME Total Proposed $3,470,460 Recaptured Funds/ Program Delivery $650,000* Total Community Development Budget $4,120,460 *To be utilized for New Construction 18 Attachment 2: Consolidated Plan and Budget Development Process Summary, FY 2011 Event Date Surveys developed and designed Oct.-Dec. 2009 Distribution of Community Needs Survey Jan.-Mar. 2010 Building Conditions Survey conducted Feb.-Mar. 2010 Human Service Agency Survey administered to agencies February 2010 Participating in quarterly Community Partnership Board (CPB) meeting Pre-application workshop for agencies Feb. 12, 2010 Public hearing on Consolidated Plan and Budget (Lincoln Center) Mar.16, 2010 Public meeting at Neighborhood Seminar Supper Mar. 22, 2010 Community Discussion Groups held for 2010 Brazos Valley Mar.-Apr. 2010 Health Status Assessment Discussion Groups with community stakeholders Apr. 1, 2010 Apr. 6, 2010 Apr. 7, 2010 JRFRC Public Service Agency review meetings Apr. 8, 2010 Apr. 15, 2010 Apr. 22, 2010 Apr. 29, 2010 May 6, 2010 May 13, 2010 May 20, 2010 May 21, 2010 JRFRC Public Service Agency public hearings May 25, 2010 May 26, 2010 30-Day Public Comment Period begun June 21, 2010 First presentation of Consolidated Plan and Budget to City Council June 24, 2010 Public hearing to present proposed Consolidated Plan and Budget July 6, 2010 (Lincoln Center) Final presentation and adoption of Consolidated Plan and Budget by July 22, 2010 Council 19 Attachment 3: FY 2011 CDBG Public Service Funding Summary & Recommendations Agency Program Requested Recommended Funding Funded Items Client #’s /Cost per Client Funding City Brazos Valley Food Bank Backpack Program $22,325 $22,325 Supplies-Food 737 $30.29 CS Twin City Mission, Inc. The Bridge Shelter Case Manager/Client Assistance Program $35,031 $35,031 Case Manager Direct Salary/Client Assistance 550 $63.69 Bryan Family Promise of Bryan-College Station BV Innkeepers Case Management $20,000 $20,000 Personnel 14 $1,428.57 Bryan Mental Health Mental Retardation Authority of Brazos Valley Mary Lake Drop-in Center $29,873 $29,873 Salary (No Fringe), Utilities, Auto, Maintenance, Food 45 $663.84 CS Brazos Maternal & Child Health Clinic, Inc. The Prenatal Clinic $25,000 $25,000 Medical Supplies, Vitamins, Medicine 1,020 $24.50 CS Voices for Children Court- Appointed Special Advocates $23,716 $23,716 Volunteer Coordinator, Outreach and Recruitment Director 280 $84.70 CS Brazos County Rape Crisis Center, Inc., dba Sexual Assault Resource Center (SARC) Individual Counseling and Accompaniment $21,600 $21,600 Direct Aid 150 $144.04 Bryan & CS Unity Partners dba Project Unity Safe Harbor Supervised Visitation Program $25,000 $25,000 Personnel, Fringe, Space Rental, Security 315 $79.36 Bryan Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Texas BBBS of Brazos Valley $12,000 $12,000 Personnel 278 $43.16 CS Total $214,545 $214,545 City Department Programs Kids Klub $25,000 CS Lincoln Center $13,800 CS 20 Attachment 4: FY 2011 CDBG Public Facility Funding Summary & Recommendations Activity Recommended Funding Description College Main Street Rehabilitation $398,000* Funds will be used to rehabilitate 230 feet of College Main between the City limit line and approximately halfway between Spruce and Cherry Streets. The project scope will include the replacement of existing roadway, sidewalks, and drainage infrastructure. Prior year funds will be used for project delivery costs including staff salaries and benefits to monitor the project. George K Fitch Park Improvements $104,750* Funds will be used to construct a lighted jogging path and plant trees. Prior year funds will be used for project delivery costs including staff salaries and benefits to monitor the project. W.A. Tarrow Park Improvements $61,250* Funds will be used to install new playground equipment. Prior year funds will be used for project delivery costs including staff salaries and benefits to monitor the project. Mixed Use Development $249,418** Funds will be used in conjunction with private funds for infrastructure improvements needed for the construction of a mixed-use development on Holleman Drive. The specific use of funds will be determined and committed through a development agreement for the project. Prior year funds will be used for project delivery costs including staff salaries and benefits to monitor the project. Total $813,418 *$1,250 - Prior Year Funds **$40,689 - Prior Year Funds 21 Attachment 5: PY 2010 – 2014 Community Development Goals Housing Goal: Ensure adequate housing assistance for lower income homeowners. Strategies: - Encourage and facilitate maintenance of residential units by L/M income homeowners through residential rehab loans. - Acquire real property for future development of affordable housing, parks, or other activities that enhance neighborhoods. - Encourage and facilitate the removal and replacement of dilapidated structures and/or address community emergencies. - Utilize code enforcement regulations to maintain the integrity of older neighborhoods. Goal: Retain and expand affordable housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income homebuyers. Strategies: -Encourage and support programs and projects that provide financial assistance to L/M income purchasers of existing or new affordable homes. - Encourage and support programs and projects that provide education and counseling to lower-income home-owners and homebuyers. - Encourage and support programs and projects that construct new housing units for L/M homebuyers. Goal: Ensure adequate affordable rental housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income families and individuals. Strategies: - Encourage and facilitate the rehabilitation of affordable rental units. - Encourage and facilitate the construction of new affordable rental units. Homelessness and Special Needs Goal: Address the needs of homeless persons to make the transition to permanent housing and independent living and help families avoid becoming homeless. Strategies: -Preventing homelessness: - Provide assistance for low-income households to secure and sustain safe, decent affordable housing. -Outreach and assessment: - Foster coordination, collaboration, and increased resources to assess community needs, available services, and service gaps. Use this information to target and improve service provision. -Emergency and transitional shelter: - Encourage and support programs and agencies that supply or seek out emergency and/or transitional shelter for families and individuals. -Transition to permanent housing and independent living: - Assist homeless persons in meeting various human and health service needs as well as provide training and counseling opportunities to help with the transition to self-sufficiency. 22 Goal: Ensure adequate affordable housing opportunities and supportive services for the lower income special needs populations. Strategy: - Encourage and facilitate organizations that provide social and/or housing services to special needs populations. Non-Housing Goal: Encourage and support the delivery of health and human services to assist families in reaching their fullest potential. Strategies: - Encourage and support nonprofit providers of health care, dental care, and mental health care to deliver programs to qualified L/M families/persons. - Encourage continued development and facilitate development of new or enhanced senior citizen programming. - Facilitate development of affordable childcare and youth programs. - Ensure that the provision of other health and human services is approached within a comprehensive framework to enable families and individuals in breaking the cycle of poverty. - Encourage new or enhanced transportation programs that assist L/M income persons to address their mobility needs. Goal: Provide safe, secure, and healthy environments for families and individuals. Strategies: - Improved accessibility to programs serving L/M income individuals and families through rehabilitation or expansion of public or private facilities. - Rehabilitation and expansion of infrastructure including water and sewer lines, street, and sidewalk, and flood drain improvements. - Improve or expand park facilities including green space, neighborhood parks, and recreational facilities. - Improve transportation facilities to increase the accessibility of health and human services and basic needs for L/M income persons. Goal: Development of a strong and diverse economic environment to break cycle of poverty. Strategies: - Rehabilitate and/or develop new spaces for businesses to better realize job creation. - Support and expand community wide training and employment activities targeting low/mod households. 23 24 25 26 Attachment 6: Comments on Proposed PY 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan and FY 2011 Annual Action Plan and Budget Comments from March 16th, 2010 Public Hearing Comments MHMR appreciates the City of College Station supporting the use of 15% of CDBG funds for public service agencies. We ask you continue this effort. Voices for Children, Inc. CASA of Brazos Valley appreciates the City of CS supporting the use of 15% of CDBG grant for Public Service Agencies. Request City Council continue to fund at 15%. Plan Needs: 1) Homeless, victims of domestic violence are still great needs; 2) Jobs with increase wages; 3) Food for those in need; 4) Health care for indigent; and 5) tenant rental assistance. I strongly support continuing the use of CDBG funds to support local agencies serving low-income citizens. This is especially important in these difficult economic times. We strongly support the cities continuing to earmark 15% of its allocation for Public Services. CDBG Public Services funds have enabled the Brazos Valley Food Bank to expand its vitally important Backpack Program. Our Backpack Program allows us to fill the gap for food on the weekends that children who are eligible for free and/or reduced lunch would otherwise experience. Programs like our Backpack Program need local dollars to expand and succeed. Before we had CDBG Public Services funds, we collaborated with one school on this program. Because of CDBG Public Services funds, we are now working with fifteen (15) different schools, positively impacting the lives of over 450 food insecure students each week of the school year. Voices for Children appreciates the 15% of HUD funding that the cities have allotted to Public Service Agencies each year and encourage the City of College Station to continue that same level of support in the future. It has been crucial to the backbone support for Voices for Children along with other social service organizations. Comments from July 7th, 2009 Public Hearing (Presentation of Draft Plan) Comments The issues listed in the Consolidated Plan are still of major importance to Twin City Mission. The Mission has not been able to put any of these goals to rest and therefore must continue to work towards a better community. The Mission encourages both cities to continue to support the local service providers with the 15% allocation. Comments from the 30-Day Public Comment Period Comments 27 July 22, 2010 Consent Agenda Item No. 2e Revised Ordinance – Chapter 10 Traffic Code Related to Parking Regulations in Residential Areas To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Jeff Capps, Chief of Police Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding modifications and revisions to Chapter 10 “Traffic Code”, Section 6 (A) “Definitions” and 6 (B) “Regulations” as it relates to parking, standing or storing of trailers in residential areas. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Goal II.2 Resolution to parking in residential areas. Recommendation(s): N/A Summary: This item is a follow up to Council initiated discussion as it relates to the regulations of parking trailers in residential areas. The current Ordinance prohibits the parking, storing or standing of trucks, truck tractors or trailers in residential areas for other than the actual loading or unloading of goods or passengers. It further prohibits the parking, storing or standing of trucks, truck tractors or trailers in residential lawns or driveways for other than the actual loading or unloading of goods or passengers. We are proposing the adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 10, “Traffic Code”, Section 6 (A) “Definitions” and 6 (B) “Regulations” of the Code of Ordinances. The revisions include a definition added to section 6 (A) “Person” - Any owner, occupant, or person in charge of property used for residential purposes. Section 6 (B) has been revised by breaking the regulations into 4 main categories which include, (1) Residential Areas, (2) Residential Yards, Lawns and Driveways, (3) Residential Street Parking, and (4) Motor Vehicle Parking. This will help organize the Ordinance and allow for easier understanding of the regulations. Section 6 (B)(2) b. has been revised to read, It shall be unlawful for a person to permit the parking, standing, or storing of trailers in residential yards or lawns, excluding driveways, for other than actual supervised loading or unloading of goods or passengers. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Final copy of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 10 “Traffic Code” Section 6 (A) and 6 (B). 2. Copy of Current Ordinance. 28 29 30 31 Current Ordinance SECTION 6: PARKING, STANDING, OR STORING OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, TRAILERS OR TRUCKS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS A. DEFINITIONS (1) Camper - A separate vehicle designed for human habitation which can be attached and detached to or towed by a motor vehicle. (2) Driveway - Any paved concrete, asphalt, gravel and/or other impervious surface area on a lot designed and required to provide direct access for vehicles between a street and private garage, carport, or other permitted parking space, or parking area or loading area, garage and attached or detached accessory building located on a lot developed with a residential dwelling used by the occupant of the premises principally for, but not limited to, the storage of passenger vehicles or other vehicles and equipment. Driveways or paved parking areas must be substantially free from grass, weeds, or other vegetation and must be adequately maintained. (3) Motor Home - A self-contained vehicle designed for human habitation with its own motive power and with a passageway from the body of the home to the driver and front passenger seats. (4) Motor Vehicle - A self-propelled device in, upon or by which any person or property is or may be transported. (5) Recreational Vehicle - Any motor vehicle or trailer designed or used as a travel trailer, camper, motor home, tent trailer, boat, boat trailer, camping trailer, or other similar purposes. (6) Residential area or residential lot - shall mean any area or lot occupied by residential dwellings though the area may be zoned for use other than residential. (7) Trailer - A vehicle without motive power designed for carrying persons, animals, or property on its own structure and to be drawn by a vehicle with motive power. The term shall include, but not be limited to, semi-trailer, and utility trailer. Trailer shall not include any trailer defined as a recreational vehicle. (8) Truck - means any motor vehicle designed, used or maintained primarily for the transportation of property, with a manufacturer's rated carrying capacity exceeding two thousand (2,000) pounds. (9) Truck-tractor - means any motor vehicle designed or used primarily for drawing other vehicles. It is intended that the term includes a motor vehicle that is otherwise a truck-tractor that may be engaged with a semi-trailer. B. REGULATIONS (1) It shall be unlawful for the owner, occupant or person in charge of property used for residential purposes to permit the parking, standing or storing of trucks, trailers, or truck-tractors as defined herein in residential areas for other than actual supervised loading or unloading of goods and passengers. It shall be unlawful for the owner, occupant or person in charge of property used for residential purposes to permit the parking, standing or storing of trailers, trucks, or truck-tractors in residential yards or lawns, including driveways, for other than actual supervised loading or unloading of goods or passengers. (2) It shall be unlawful for the owner, occupant or person in charge of property used for residential purposes to permit the parking, standing or storing of recreational vehicles on residential 32 streets for a period of time in excess of seventy-two (72) hours within any thirty (30) day period. (3) It shall be unlawful for the owner, occupant or person in charge of property used for residential purposes to permit the parking, standing or storing of motor vehicles, excluding recreational vehicles on yards or lawns excluding driveways, paved parking areas, or areas screened from public view by fencing." (4) It shall be unlawful for the owner or occupant of a vehicle, other than recreational vehicles, to park or permit the parking, standing or storing of such vehicle on the yards or lawns of property used for residential purposes. Parking on driveways or paved parking areas or areas screened from public view by fencing is permitted. 33 July 22, 2010 Consent Agenda Item No. 2f Municipal Irrigation Water Use Report To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Dave Coleman, Director of Water Services Department Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the monthly report on irrigation water use at City of College Station facilities and properties. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Goal I.1 - Spending taxpayer money efficiently – efficient use of water for irrigation saves taxpayer money. Recommendation: Receive the report and provide direction as appropriate. Summary: This report is presented in furtherance of goals to promote water conservation in City operations. The report contains water usage for irrigation of City facilities, neighborhood parks, athletic fields, and has now been expanded to include other irrigated areas such as street medians. For each facility, the report includes four data points on irrigation water usage: Total in FY 2009; total for the previous 12 months; budgeted water usage for last month; and the actual water usage for last month. Estimated irrigation water use budgets were developed based on irrigated acreage and weather patterns for the reported facilities The water budgets were derived using the Texas Landscape Irrigation Auditing and Scheduling Software developed by the Irrigation Technology Center. The software uses the amount of irrigated acreage, historical weather data, as well as soil and vegetation characteristics to produce a site specific water budget. Water Services worked with the Parks and Recreation Department to establish irrigated acreage for each of the sites in the report. Each site was analyzed using aerial photographs and GIS calculations for irrigated acreage. Water budgets were calculated from this data. Meters are read throughout the month, so the use does not correspond directly to the reporting month, but it does give an accurate overview of water use for City facilities. Overall, the City did an excellent job in June of conserving water, which was aided by beneficial rainfall. In summary, the parks used 6.2 million gallons (MG) compared to a budget of 10.3 MG. City facilities used 0.7 MG, compared to a budget of 1.1 MG. Details are available in the attached report. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachment: Water Use Report – June 2010 34 College Station Irrigation Water Use Report June 2010 Parks and Athletic Fields Facility Name Irrigated Acreage FY 09 Last 12 months Last month Target for month Remarks Anderson Soccer Fields 7.3 3,979,000 3,321,000 616,000 527,600 Beachy Central Park Soccer 5.2 5,585,000 3,831,000 110,000 375,800 Beachy Central Park Softball 8.6 4,681,000 3,088,000 130,000 621,600 Bee Creek Park 4 4,307,000 3,837,000 566,000 289,100 Separate irrigation meter needed Castlegate Park 2 2,420,000 1,397,000 92,000 144,500 Castlegate Entrance Landscaping 2.8 4,937,000 2,528,000 257,000 202,400 Castlegate Pond N/A 589,000 249,000 0 N/A City Cemetery 15.8 2,463,000 1,995,000 131,000 1,141,900 May not irrigate entire acreage at all times College Station Business Center 5.1 6,868,000 3,237,000 270,000 375,800 Lemontree 0.8 722,000 596,000 96,000 57,800 Memorial Cemetery of College Station 16.7 5,979,000 6,950,000 153,000 1,207,000 May not irrigate entire acreage at all times Southwood Senior Baseball 4.4 2,945,000 2,226,000 202,000 318,000 Southwood Soccer 4.4 2,854,000 2,196,000 159,000 318,000 Southwood Youth Baseball 4.7 2,598,000 2,609,000 233,000 339,700 Southwood Youth Soccer 4.9 4,615,000 3,696,000 233,000 354,100 Veterans Park and Athletic Complex 45 26,939,000 18,907,000 2,294,000 3,252,000 Irrigation system work this month Wayne Smith Baseball 3.2 2,762,000 2,144,000 370,000 231,300 Wolf Pen Creek Amphitheater 3.9 2,763,000 2,006,000 205,000 281,900 WPC Park 4 2,763,000 1,192,000 81,000 289,100 TOTAL 90,769,000 66,005,000 6,198,000 10,327,600 Page 1 of 435 College Station Irrigation Water Use Report June 2010 Municipal Buildings Facility Name Irrigated Acreage FY 09 Last 12 months Last month Target for month Remarks City Hall 1.6 2,144,000 895,000 117,000 115,600 Fire Station 1 0.6 242,000 210,000 30,000 43,400 Fire Station 2 0.6 not representative not representative 12,000 43,400 Separated irrigation from domestic 12/09 Fire Station 3 1 696,000 983,000 182,000 79,500 Fire Station 5 1.1 1,532,000 720,000 84,000 72,300 Larry Ringer Library 3.2 1,702,000 794,000 8,000 231,200 Municipal Court 2.4 1,989,000 679,000 111,000 173,500 Northgate Parking Garage 0.5 149,000 256,000 33,000 36,100 Northgate Promenade 0.5 130,000 132,000 15,000 36,100 Police Department 0.4 87,000 101,000 9,000 28,900 Utility Customer Service 2.3 1,403,000 721,000 92,000 166,200 Utility Meeting and Training Facility 0.59 1,536,000 346,000 17,000 43,400 Utility Service Center 1.2 763,000 501,000 15,000 86,700 TOTAL 12,373,000 6,338,000 725,000 1,156,300 Page 2 of 436 College Station Irrigation Water Use Report June 2010 Irrigated Medians and Right of Way Facility Name Irrigated Acreage FY 09 Last 12 months Last month Target for month Remarks Barron Rd Streetscape 1 N/A N/A 113,000 60,000 N/A Barron Rd Streetscape 2 N/A N/A 290,000 134,000 N/A Dartmouth medians 1 N/A N/A 510,000 93,000 N/A Dartmouth medians 2 N/A N/A 73,000 7,000 N/A Dominik median @ Glen Haven N/A N/A 24,000 1,000 N/A Eagle Ave Streetscape 1 N/A N/A 61,000 14,000 N/A Eagle Ave Streetscape 2 N/A N/A 112,000 19,000 N/A George Bush Dr E: Texas to Dominik N/A N/A 189,000 12,000 N/A Krenek Tap @ Dartmouth N/A N/A 123,000 15,000 N/A Post Oak Mall Sign Bed N/A N/A 5,000 0 N/A Rock Prairie Rd median N/A N/A 26,000 2,000 N/A Tarrow St medians N/A N/A 195,000 22,000 N/A Univ @ Hwy 6 trees N/A N/A 2,028,000 1,179,000 N/A Univ @ Hwy 6 Medians 1 N/A N/A 90,000 5,000 N/A Univ @ Hwy 6 Medians 2 N/A N/A 26,000 1,000 N/A W.D. Fitch Medians near FS #5 0.5 N/A 983,000 178,000 N/A Valve hung open; fixed W.D. Fitch Medians @ Rock Prairie 0.5 N/A 309,000 45,000 N/A Welcome Sign - Hwy 6 N/A N/A 7,000 1,000 N/A Winding Rd Island N/A N/A 14,000 1,000 N/A 0 5,178,000 1,789,000 0 Page 3 of 437 Facility Name Irrigated Acreage FY 09 Last 12 months Last month Target for month Remarks College Station Irrigation Water Use Report June 2010 Irrigated Medians and Right of Way - TEXAS AVE. Facility Name Irrigated Acreage FY 09 Last 12 months Last month Target for month Remarks Tx Av Phase I Univ to GBDE 1 N/A N/A 72,000 5,000 N/A Tx Av Phase I Univ to GBDE 2 N/A N/A 232,000 27,000 N/A Tx Av Phase I Univ to GBDE 3 N/A N/A 170,000 16,000 N/A Tx Av Phase I Univ to GBDE 4 N/A N/A 371,000 23,000 N/A Texas Ave Median 1 N/A N/A 63,000 0 N/A Texas Ave Median 2 N/A N/A 62,000 0 N/A Texas Ave Median 3 N/A N/A 106,000 0 N/A Tx Av Phase II streetscape 1 N/A N/A 148,000 72,000 N/A Leak reported and fixed Tx Av Phase II streetscape 2 N/A N/A 23,000 1,000 N/A Tx Av Phase II streetscape 3 N/A N/A 14,000 2,000 N/A Tx Av Phase II streetscape 4 N/A N/A 87,000 7,000 N/A Tx Av Phase II streetscape 5 N/A N/A 4,000 2,000 N/A Tx Av Phase II streetscape 6 N/A N/A 5,000 2,000 N/A Tx Av Phase II streetscape 7 N/A N/A 14,000 1,000 N/A Tx Av Phase II streetscape 8 N/A N/A 0 0 N/A 0 1,371,000 158,000 0 Page 4 of 438 LOCID Address Street Description Last 12 months Last month 178656 1550 HARVEY POST OAK MALL SIGN BED 5,000 0 185336 398 CITY TARROW Tarrow Street medians NE of Hilton 195,000 22,000 186542 751 TEXAS Texas Av Phase I medians/streetscape University to GBDE 72,000 5,000 186544 951 TEXAS Texas Av Phase I medians/streetscape University to GBDE 232,000 27,000 186546 1003 TEXAS Texas Av Phase I medians/streetscape University to GBDE 170,000 16,000 186548 1301 TEXAS Texas Av Phase I medians/streetscape University to GBDE 371,000 23,000 189594 1798 UNIVERSITY Un Dr medains at SH 6-west side 90,000 5,000 189658 5099 STATE HIGHWAY 6 WELCOME SIGN ON HWY 6 7,000 1,000 196100 1510 UNIVERSITY Un Dr medains at SH 6-west side 26,000 1,000 200024 305 GEORGE BUSH G Bush Drive East Texas to Dominick 189,000 12,000 200362 905 WINDING IRRIGATION METER FOR ISLAND 14,000 1,000 201260 516 CAMP K Tap at Dartmouth streetscape 123,000 15,000 201332 1601 WILLIAM D FITCH FITCH MEDIANS (1 OF 2)983,000 178,000 201480 2150 ROCK PRAIRIE ROCK PRAIRIE MEDIAN 26,000 2,000 202112 1602 DOMINIK Doninick Street median at Glen Haven 24,000 1,000 210732 2551 TEXAS TEXAS AVE MEDIAN 63,000 0 210734 2150 TEXAS TEXAS AVE MEDIAN 62,000 0 210736 1808 TEXAS TEXAS AVE MEDIAN 106,000 0 213284 507 CHURCH NORTHGATE - WHAT PART?484,000 62,000 213676 2578 DARTMOUTH Dartmouth medians K Tap to FM 2818 510,000 93,000 213678 2750 DARTMOUTH Dartmouth medians K Tap to FM 2818 73,000 7,000 214534 410 COLLEGE MAIN ???1,000 0 216066 2720 TEXAS Tx Av Phase II streetscape Dominick to FM 2818 148,000 72,000 216068 2709 TEXAS Tx Av Phase II streetscape Dominick to FM 2818 23,000 1,000 216070 2509 TEXAS Tx Av Phase II streetscape Dominick to FM 2818 14,000 2,000 216072 2505 TEXAS Tx Av Phase II streetscape Dominick to FM 2818 87,000 7,000 216074 1801 TEXAS Tx Av Phase II streetscape Dominick to FM 2818 4,000 2,000 39 LOCID Address Street Description Last 12 months Last month 216076 112 HARVEY Tx Av Phase II streetscape Dominick to FM 2818 5,000 2,000 216078 1620 TEXAS Tx Av Phase II streetscape Dominick to FM 2818 14,000 1,000 216182 2801 TEXAS AVE S A Tx Av Phase II streetscape Dominick to FM 2818 0 0 216252 1904 WILLIAM D FITCH FITCH MEDIANS (2 OF 2)309,000 45,000 216492 925 EARL RUDDER COCS IRRIGATION 2,028,000 1,179,000 216936 951 EAGLE Eagle Streetscape from Victoria going east 61,000 14,000 216938 1201 EAGLE Eagle Streetscape from Victoria going east 112,000 19,000 216940 3808 BARRON Barron Rd Streetscape SH6 to Decatur 113,000 60,000 216942 1800 BARRON Barron Rd Streetscape SH6 to Decatur 290,000 134,000 40 July 22, 2010 Consent Agenda Item No. 2g Authorization to Disburse Grant Funding to Reynolds and Reynolds, Inc. To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: David Gwin, Director of Economic and Community Development Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion authorizing the payment of Retention and Expansion and Payroll Grants in a total amount of $40,000 to Reynolds and Reynolds, Inc. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Goal III.1 Promote knowledge-based business Recommendation(s): In fulfillment of the City’s contractual obligation, staff recommends approval of a $40,000 payment to Reynolds and Reynolds, Inc. for performance in 2009. Summary: On, December 14, 2006 the City Council unanimously approved an Economic Development Agreement with Reynolds and Reynolds, Inc. to provide Retention and Expansion and Payroll Grants for economic performance at their 200 Quality Circle campus in the Business Center at College Station. The term of this agreement is ten (10) years and the total maximum amount of all applicable grants is $550,000. This payment represents the third annual disbursement; Reynolds and Reynolds has received $45,000 previously in both 2008 and 2009. The Retention and Expansion component of the existing Agreement requires Reynolds and Reynolds to maintain real and personal property of at least $24 million and maintain an annual payroll of $18 million. As a performance incentive, the Agreement provides for Reynolds and Reynolds to receive a Retention and Expansion Grant in an amount of $30,000 and a Payroll Grant of $5,000 for each $1 million increment in additional payroll over the $18 million base. Based on the Statement of Compliance as recently submitted by Reynolds and Reynolds to the Research Valley Partnership and the City, the company has established real and personal property valuation in an amount of $31,301,120 and, as such, is eligible for a Retention and Expansion Grant of $30,000. Further the company currently maintains a payroll of $20,111,033.88 and, as such, is eligible for a combined Payroll Grant of $10,000. Budget & Financial Summary: Funding in the amount of $40,000 is budgeted and available in the City’s Economic Development Fund. Attachments: Statement of Compliance – Reynolds & Reynolds, Inc. - 2009 41 42 43 22 July 2010 Consent Agenda Item No. 2h Resolution authorizing a Development Agreement with CVCS LLC and an Advance Funding Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Bob Cowell, Director of Planning & Development Services Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on entering into the following two items: 1. a development agreement between the City of College Station and CVCS, LLC for design of and payment for temporary construction access from Harvey Mitchell Parkway to the Campus Village development; and 2. a resolution for an Advanced Funding Agreement (AFA) between the City of College Station and Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for city contributions to transportation improvement project to wit: a temporary construction access from Harvey Mitchell Parkway to the Campus Village development. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Improving Multi Modal Transportation Recommendation(s): Staff recommends adopting both items together, as the Development Agreement can only be useful for the Developer if the City approves the AFA. Summary: As part of the Campus Village development currently under construction, a temporary construction access driveway is desired by the developer which would enhance developer’s ability to access its property directly rather than through a neighboring property. Staff supports this improvement as it will enhance the overall flow of traffic in the area. The temporary construction access will only be used during the construction of this development. A driveway permit application has been submitted by the developer to the City and TxDOT. TxDOT has approved the permit with the following conditions: A temporary left turn lane must be constructed to the entrance of the construction exit and the driveway to the Woodlands on Harvey Mitchell Parkway. The developer will submit construction plans for the temporary left turn lane to TxDOT for review and must meet TxDOT’s design standards. In order to accomplish the above, developer must first enter into a development agreement with the City to perform the design of these improvements for TxDOT and to provide funding to the City. In turn, the City will give the money it receives from the Developer to TxDOT under the AFA. TxDOT will then issue a change order and direct their contractor presently working on the Harvey Mitchell Parkway and Wellborn interchange project to construct the temporary left turn lane and temporary construction access. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Development Agreement (on file with the City Secretary) 2. Advanced Funding Agreement (on file with the City Secretary) 3. Resolution 44 45 CSJ: 2399-01-022 District: Bryan (17) Code Chart 64: City of College Station (09050) Project: STP 2008(683)RGS CFDA: N/A AFA-AFA_VolTIP Page 1 of 7 Revised 02/10/10 THE STATE OF TEXAS § THE COUNTY OF TRAVIS § ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR VOLUNTARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTIONS TO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WITH NO REQUIRED MATCH THIS AGREEMENT IS MADE BY AND BETWEEN the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the “State”, and the City of College Station, acting by and through its duly authorized officials, hereinafter called the “Local Government.” WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Transportation Code, Chapters 201, 221, 227, and 361, authorize the State to lay out, construct, maintain, and operate a system of streets, roads, and highways that comprise the State Highway System; and, WHEREAS, Government Code, Chapter 791, and Transportation Code, §201.209 and Chapter 221, authorize the State to contract with municipalities and political subdivisions; and, WHEREAS, Commission Minute Order Number 111335 authorizes the State to undertake and complete a highway improvement generally described as the construction of a highway-railroad grade separation; and, WHEREAS, the Local Government has requested that the State allow the Local Government to participate in said improvement by funding that portion of the improvement described as the construction of a left-turn lane on FM 2818 at its intersections with the temporary Campus Village construction entrance and the Woodlands south driveway, hereinafter called the “Project"; and, WHEREAS, the State has determined that such participation is in the best interest of the citizens of the State; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereto, to be by them respectively kept and performed as hereinafter set forth, the State and the Local Government do agree as follows: AGREEMENT Article 1. Time Period Covered This agreement becomes effective when signed by the last party whose signing makes the agreement fully executed, and the State and the Local Government will consider it to be in full force and effect until the Project described herein has been completed and accepted by all parties or unless terminated, as hereinafter provided. Article 2. Project Funding and Work Responsibilities The State will authorize the performance of only those Project items of work which the Local Government has requested and has agreed to pay for as described in Attachment A, Payment Provision and Work Responsibilities which is attached to and made a part of this contract. EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION 46 CSJ: 2399-01-022 District: Bryan (17) Code Chart 64: City of College Station (09050) Project: STP 2008(683)RGS CFDA: N/A AFA-AFA_VolTIP Page 2 of 7 Revised 02/10/10 In addition to identifying those items of work paid for by payments to the State, Attachment A, Payment Provision and Work Responsibilities, also specifies those Project items of work that are the responsibility of the Local Government and will be carried out and completed by the Local Government, at no cost to the State. At least sixty (60) days prior to the date set for receipt of the construction bids, the Local Government shall remit its remaining financial share for the State’s estimated construction oversight and construction costs. In the event that the State determines that additional funding by the Local Government is required at any time during the Project, the State will notify the Local Government in writing. The Local Government shall make payment to the State within thirty (30) days from receipt of the State’s written notification. Whenever funds are paid by the Local Government to the State under this Agreement, the Local Government shall remit a check or warrant made payable to the "Texas Department of Transportation Trust Fund." The check or warrant shall be deposited by the State in an escrow account to be managed by the State. Funds in the escrow account may only be applied by the State to the Project. If, after final Project accounting, excess funds remain in the escrow account, those funds may be applied by the State to the Local Government's contractual obligations to the State under another advance funding agreement. Article 3. Right of Access If the Local Government is the owner of any part of the Project site, the Local Government shall permit the State or its authorized representative access to the site to perform any activities required to execute the work. Article 4. Adjustments Outside the Project Site The Local Government will provide for all necessary right-of-way and utility adjustments needed for performance of the work on sites not owned or to be acquired by the State. Article 5. Responsibilities of the Parties The State and the Local Government agree that neither party is an agent, servant, or employee of the other party and each party agrees it is responsible for its individual acts and deeds as well as the acts and deeds of its contractors, employees, representatives, and agents. Article 6. Document and Information Exchange The Local Government agrees to electronically deliver to the State all general notes, specifications, contract provision requirements and related documentation in a Microsoft® Word or similar document. If requested by the State, the Local Government will use the State's document template. The Local Government shall also provide a detailed construction time estimate including types of activities and month in the format required by the State. This requirement applies whether the local government creates the documents with its own forces or by hiring a consultant or professional provider. At the request of the State, the Local Government shall submit any information required by the State in the format directed by the State. EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION 47 CSJ: 2399-01-022 District: Bryan (17) Code Chart 64: City of College Station (09050) Project: STP 2008(683)RGS CFDA: N/A AFA-AFA_VolTIP Page 3 of 7 Revised 02/10/10 Article 7. Interest The State will not pay interest on funds provided by the Local Government. Funds provided by the Local Government will be deposited into, and retained in, the State Treasury. Article 8. Inspection and Conduct of Work Unless otherwise specifically stated in Attachment A, Payment Provision and Work Responsibilities, to this contract, the State will supervise and inspect all work performed hereunder and provide such engineering inspection and testing services as may be required to ensure that the Project is accomplished in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All correspondence and instructions to the contractor performing the work will be the sole responsibility of the State. Unless otherwise specifically stated in Attachment A to this contract, all work will be performed in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets, and Bridges adopted by the State and incorporated herein by reference, or special specifications approved by the State. Article 9. Increased Costs In the event it is determined that the funding provided by the Local Government will be insufficient to cover the State's cost for performance of the Local Government's requested work, the Local Government will pay to the State the additional funds necessary to cover the anticipated additional cost. The State shall send the Local Government a written notification stating the amount of additional funding needed and stating the reasons for the needed additional funds. The Local Government shall pay the funds to the State within 30 days of the written notification, unless otherwise agreed to by all parties to this agreement. If the Local Government cannot pay the additional funds, this contract shall be mutually terminated in accord with Article 11 - Termination. If this is a fixed price agreement as specified in Attachment A, Payment Provision and Work Responsibilities, this provision shall only apply in the event changed site conditions are discovered or as mutually agreed upon by the State and the Local Government. If any existing or future local ordinances, commissioners court orders, rules, policies, or other directives, including but not limited to outdoor advertising billboards and storm water drainage facility requirements, are more restrictive than State or Federal Regulations, or if any other locally proposed changes, including but not limited to plats or replats, result in increased costs, then any increased costs associated with the ordinances or changes will be paid by the local government. The cost of providing right of way acquired by the State shall mean the total expenses in acquiring the property interests either through negotiations or eminent domain proceedings, including but not limited to expenses related to relocation, removal, and adjustment of eligible utilities. Article 10. Maintenance Upon completion of the Project, the State will assume responsibility for the maintenance of the completed Project unless otherwise specified in Attachment A to this agreement. Article 11. Termination This agreement may be terminated in the following manner: ♦ by mutual written agreement and consent of both parties; ♦ by either party upon the failure of the other party to fulfill the obligations set forth herein; ♦ by the State if it determines that the performance of the Project is not in the best interest of the State. EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION 48 CSJ: 2399-01-022 District: Bryan (17) Code Chart 64: City of College Station (09050) Project: STP 2008(683)RGS CFDA: N/A AFA-AFA_VolTIP Page 4 of 7 Revised 02/10/10 If the agreement is terminated in accordance with the above provisions, the Local Government will be responsible for the payment of Project costs incurred by the State on behalf of the Local Government up to the time of termination. ♦ Upon completion of the Project, the State will perform an audit of the Project costs. Any funds due to the Local Government, the State, or the Federal Government will be promptly paid by the owing party. Article 12. Notices All notices to either party by the other required under this agreement shall be delivered personally or sent by certified or U.S. mail, postage prepaid or sent by electronic mail, (electronic notice being permitted to the extent permitted by law but only after a separate written consent of the parties), addressed to such party at the following addresses: Local Government: Mr. Glenn Brown City Manager City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-9960 State: Robert A. Appleton, P.E. Director of Transportation Planning and Development Texas Department of Transportation 1300 North Texas Avenue Bryan, Texas 77803-2760 All notices shall be deemed given on the date so delivered or so deposited in the mail, unless otherwise provided herein. Either party may change the above address by sending written notice of the change to the other party. Either party may request in writing that such notices shall be delivered personally or by certified U.S. mail and such request shall be honored and carried out by the other party. Article 13. Sole Agreement In the event the terms of the agreement are in conflict with the provisions of any other existing agreements between the Local Government and the State, the latest agreement shall take precedence over the other agreements in matters related to the Project. Article 14. Successors and Assigns The State and the Local Government each binds itself, its successors, executors, assigns, and administrators to the other party to this agreement and to the successors, executors, assigns, and administrators of such other party in respect to all covenants of this agreement. Article 15. Amendments By mutual written consent of the parties, this contract may be amended prior to its expiration. Article 16. State Auditor The state auditor may conduct an audit or investigation of any entity receiving funds from the state directly under the contract or indirectly through a subcontract under the contract. Acceptance of funds directly under the contract or indirectly through a subcontract under this contract acts as acceptance of the authority of the state auditor, under the direction of the legislative audit committee, to conduct an audit or investigation in connection with those funds. An entity that is the subject of an audit or investigation must provide the state auditor with access to any information the state auditor considers relevant to the investigation or audit. EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION 49 CSJ: 2399-01-022 District: Bryan (17) Code Chart 64: City of College Station (09050) Project: STP 2008(683)RGS CFDA: N/A AFA-AFA_VolTIP Page 5 of 7 Revised 02/10/10 Article 17. Insurance If this agreement authorizes the Local Government or its contractor to perform any work on State right of way, before beginning work the entity performing the work shall provide the State with a fully executed copy of the State's Form 1560 Certificate of Insurance verifying the existence of coverage in the amounts and types specified on the Certificate of Insurance for all persons and entities working on State right of way. This coverage shall be maintained until all work on the State right of way is complete. If coverage is not maintained, all work on State right of way shall cease immediately, and the State may recover damages and all costs of completing the work. Article 18. Signatory Warranty The signatories to this agreement warrant that each has the authority to enter into this agreement on behalf of the party they represent. EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION 50 CSJ: 2399-01-022 District: Bryan (17) Code Chart 64: City of College Station (09050) Project: STP 2008(683)RGS CFDA: N/A AFA-AFA_VolTIP Page 6 of 7 Revised 02/10/10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE STATE AND THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT have executed duplicate counterparts to effectuate this agreement. THE STATE OF TEXAS Executed for the Executive Director and approved for the Texas Transportation Commission for the purpose and effect of activating and/or carrying out the orders, established policies or work programs heretofore approved and authorized by the Texas Transportation Commission. By_________________________________ Date__________________________ District Engineer THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT Name of the Local Government City of College Station By_________________________________ Date__________________________ Typed or Printed Name and Title Nancy Berry, Mayor, City of College Station ATTEST: _________________________________ Connie Hooks, City Secretary _________________________________ Date APPROVED: _________________________________ City Manager _________________________________ Date _________________________________ City Attorney _________________________________ Date _________________________________ Chief Financial Officer _________________________________ Date EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION 51 CSJ: 2399-01-022 District: Bryan (17) Code Chart 64: City of College Station (09050) Project: STP 2008(683)RGS CFDA: N/A AFA-AFA_VolTIP Page 7 of 7 Revised 02/10/10 ATTACHMENT A Payment Provision and Work Responsibilities The Local Government will pay for the cost of the construction of a left-turn lane on FM 2818 at its intersections with the temporary Campus Village construction entrance and the Woodlands south driveway, which are on-system locations. This work may include, but is not limited to, the cost for all temporary pavements, signs, pavement markings and markers. The Local Government’s participation is 100% of the cost of this particular improvement. The Local Government’s estimated cost of this additional work is $ TBD, which includes the State’s direct cost for construction items, the costs of necessary maintenance of those items, and construction engineering and contingencies. The State’s contractor will construct the work. The State has estimated the project to be as follows: Description Total Estimate Cost State Participation Local Participation % Cost % Cost Construction of Temporary Pavement $0 0% $0 100% $0 Construction of Pavement Markings and Markers $0 0% $0 100% $0 Construction of Signs $0 0% $0 100% $0 Subtotal $0 $0 $0 Direct State Costs (including plan review, construction inspection and oversight) $0 0% $0 100% $0 Indirect State Costs $0 0% $0 100% $0 TOTAL $0 $ 0 $0 Direct State Costs are estimated at 12 percent of the estimated construction cost. Indirect State Costs are estimated at 5.86% of the estimated construction cost. Local Government’s Total Estimated Participation (100%) = $ TBD It is further understood that the State will include only those items for the improvements as requested and required by the Local Government. This is an estimate only; final participation amounts will be based on actual charges to the project. EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION 52 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 53 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 54 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 55 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 56 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 57 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 58 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 59 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 60 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 61 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 62 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 63 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 64 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 65 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 66 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 67 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 68 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 69 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 70 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 71 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 72 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 73 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 74 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 75 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 76 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 77 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 78 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 79 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 80 EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION 81 July 22, 2010 Consent Agenda Item No. 2i Construction Contract for the Hike & Bike Trail Completion Project To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Chuck Gilman, P.E., Director of Capital Projects Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion approving a resolution awarding a construction contract to Brazos Valley Services in the amount of $536,205.36 for the Hike & Bike Trail Completion project along FM 2818. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Goal IV, Improving Multi Modal Transportation. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends award to Brazos Valley Services in the amount of $536,205.36. Summary: The Hike & Bike Trail Completion Project (ST-0904) was part of the 2008 Bond Authorization to implement projects identified by the Hike & Bike Task Force and adopted by Council on November 23, 2004. After hearing the concerns of A&M Consolidated High School students at the May 18, 2009 Council Meeting, Staff proposed an alignment change and Council supported the decision for a multiuse trail to be designed and constructed along the north side of FM 2818 from Welsh to Longmire. The design contract was awarded July 9, 2009. Design was complete, and environmental clearance obtained from TxDOT in April 2010. Staff held a pre-bid public hearing at the May 17, 2010 Council Meeting where support was expressed for the project, and Council directed staff to proceed with the advertisement for construction bids. An alternate bid item to extend the sidewalk from Texas Avenue to Longmire Drive was also included in the bidding documents. Favorable bids were received on this project, so the alternate bid item will be included in this construction project. Upon completion of this project, the multiuse trail and sidewalk extension will provide complete connectivity between Texas Avenue and Welsh Avenue along FM 2818. Seven (7) competitive bids were produced in response to Bid No. 10-15. The low bidder for the project is Brazos Valley Service with a proposal in the amount of $536,205.36. The contract allows for 120 days for the completion of the project. The multiuse path is expected to be complete in December 2010. Budget & Financial Summary: This project is funded from the 2008 Bond Authorization in the amount of $1,000,000. Funds in the amount of $123,915 have been committed or expended to date, leaving a balance of $876,085 for construction of the trail and other expenses. Attachments: 1. Project Map 2. Resolution 3. Bid Tabulation 82 Hi k e  & Bi k e  Tr a i l  Co m p l e t i o n  Pr o j e c t  (S T ‐09 0 4 ) Al o n g FM 28 1 8 fr o m We l s h to Te x a s Av e n u e Al o n g  FM  28 1 8  fr o m  We l s h  to  Te x a s  Av e n u e 83 84 Ci t y o f C o l l e g e S t a t i o n - P u r c h a s i n g D i v i s i o n Bi d T a b u l a t i o n f o r # 1 0 - 7 1 "H i k e a n d B i k e T r a i l " Op e n D a t e : T h u r s d a y , J u l y 1 , 2 0 1 - @ 2 : 0 0 p . m . IT E M Q T Y U N I T D E S C R I P T I O N U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E UN I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E 1. 0 1 1 L S In s u r a n c e a n d M o b i l i z a t i o n f o r a l l m a t e r i a l , eq u i p m e n t a n d l a b o r t o c o m p l e t e t h e p r o j e c t ( n o t to e x c e e d 5 % o f c o n s t r u c t i o n ) p e r l u m p s u m . $1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 Su b t o t a l I t e m 1 . 0 0 $1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2. 0 1 5 1 S T A Pr e p a r e R O W f o r t h e h i k e a n d b i k e p a t h i n c l u d i n g ex c a v a t i o n a n d h a u l o f f s p o i l m a t e r i a l a s s h o w n o n th e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e pe r S t a t i o n $5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 9 8 . 0 0 $ 4 0 , 6 9 8 . 0 0 $ 1 9 8 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 9 8 . 0 0 $ 3 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 3 8 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 6 3 . 0 0 $ 3 8 , 9 1 3 . 0 0 $ 2 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 2. 0 2 1 7 E A Re m o v e a n d R e p l a c e T r e e s a s s h o w n o n t h e d r a w i n g s an d di r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e p e r e a c h . $4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 6 . 8 0 $ 2 , 3 2 5 . 6 0 $ 1 0 1 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 1 7 . 0 0 $ 2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 8 2 5 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 2. 0 3 4 E A Re m o v e a n d R e s e t E l e c t r i c a l G r o u n d B o x t o m a t c h pr o p o s e d g r a d e a s s h o w n o n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d di r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e p e r e a c h . $ 6 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 $ 6 8 4 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 3 6 . 0 0 $ 6 8 8 . 8 3 $ 2 , 7 5 5 . 3 2 $ 6 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 $ 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 5 4.00 $ 2 , 6 1 6 . 0 0 $ 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2. 0 4 2 E A Re l o c a t e S m a l l T r a f f i c S i g n A s s e m b l y a s s h o w n o n th e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e pe r e a c h . $3 6 0 . 0 0 $ 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ 3 7 2 . 1 2 $ 7 4 4 . 2 4 $ 3 7 3 . 1 2 $ 7 4 6 . 2 4 $ 3 7 5 . 0 0 $ 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 6 4 . 0 0 $ 7 2 8 . 0 0 $ 3 5 4 . 2 5 $ 7 0 8 . 5 0 $ 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 7 0 0 . 0 0 2. 0 5 0 . 2 5 M I Tr i m m i n g o f T r e e s a n d R e m o v e l o f B r u s h a s s h o w n o n th e d r a w i n g s a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e p e r mi l e $1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 0 7 2 . 8 0 $ 4 , 0 1 8 . 2 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 2 5 . 0 0 2. 0 6 2 E A De m o l i s h e x i s t i n g 2 4 " R C P S a f e t y E n d T r e a t m e n t a s sh o w n o n t h e d r a w i n g s a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r e a c h $2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 8 . 0 0 $ 4 5 6 . 0 0 $ 2 8 7 . 0 0 $ 5 7 4 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 3. 0 1 72 5 C Y Ex c a v a t e A r e a s a s s h o w n o n t h e p l a n s a n d d i r e c t e d b y th e e n g i n e e r . R e m o v e m a t e r i a l s e n c o u n t e r e d t o t h e li n e s , a n d t y p i c a l s e c t i o n s s h o w n o n t h e p l a n s a n d cr o s s - s e c t i o n s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r c u b i c y a r d $1 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 9 . 6 2 $ 6 , 9 7 4 . 5 0 $ 6 . 8 9 $ 4 , 9 9 5 . 2 5 $ 8 . 5 0 $ 6 , 1 6 2 . 5 0 $ 6 . 0 0 $ 4 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 9 . 1 6 $ 6 , 6 4 1 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 8 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 3. 0 2 2, 5 3 4 C Y Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T o p s o i l i n c l u d i n g p l a c e m e n t a n d gr a d i n g a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e pe r s q u a r e y a r d . $1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 . 6 8 $ 3 4 , 6 6 5 . 1 2 $ 1 3 . 7 8 $ 3 4 , 9 1 8 . 5 2 $ 1 3 . 5 0 $ 3 4 , 2 0 9 . 0 0 $ 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 . 0 8 $ 3 3 , 1 4 4 . 7 2 $ 3 0 . 5 0 $ 7 7 , 2 8 7 . 0 0 Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l P e d e s t r i a n H a n d R a i l a s s h o w n o n D.L. Meacham LP $22,085.00 Ac k l a m C o n s t r u c t i o n C o . , L t d . $49,237.50 La r r y Y o u n g P a v i n g $3 0 , 9 4 5 . 0 0 Ki e s c h n i c k G e n e r a l Co n t r a c t o r s $3 4 , 9 2 8 . 0 0 Du d l e y C o n s t r u c t i o n L t d . $1 9 , 9 0 8 . 7 6 G. W . W i l l i a m s , I n c . $4 8 , 0 9 9 . 8 4 Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s 3. 0 0 R O A D W A Y & E A R T H W O R K 1. 0 0 G E N E R A L C O N S T R U C T I O N I T E M S Su b t o t a l I t e m 2 . 0 0 $ 3 6 , 3 1 0 . 0 0 2. 0 0 R E M O V A L S & R E L O C A T I O N S 3. 0 3 13 3 L F th e p l a n s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e p e r l i n e a r f o o t . $1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 6 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 7 . 4 2 $ 1 5 , 6 1 6 . 8 6 $ 8 8 . 4 0 $ 1 1 , 7 5 7 . 2 0 $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 7 , 9 3 0 . 0 0 3. 0 4 4, 6 6 7 S Y Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l 5 " S i d e w a l k i n c l u d i n g a l l em b e d m e n t , f i n i s h i n g , s u r f a c e t e x t u r e a n d j o i n t s a s sh o w n o n t h e d r a w i n g s $2 8 . 0 0 $ 1 3 0 , 6 7 6 . 0 0 $ 2 6 . 9 7 $ 1 2 5 , 8 6 8 . 9 9 $ 3 4 . 0 9 $ 1 5 9 , 0 9 8 . 0 3 $ 2 8 . 0 0 $ 1 3 0 , 6 7 6 . 0 0 $ 3 2 . 0 0 $ 1 4 9 , 3 4 4 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 6 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 , 0 1 0 . 0 0 3. 0 5 1, 0 5 0 S Y Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l 6 " S i d e w a l k i n c l u d i n g a l l em b e d m e n t , f i n i s h i n g , s u r f a c e t e x t u r e a n d j o i n t s a s sh o w n o n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r s q u a r e y a r d . $3 0 . 0 0 $ 3 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 8 . 4 6 $ 2 9 , 8 8 3 . 0 0 $ 3 9 . 8 4 $ 4 1 , 8 3 2 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 3 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 . 0 0 $ 3 6 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 1 . 0 0 $ 4 3 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 . 0 0 $ 3 4 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 3. 0 6 5, 0 9 5 S Y Pr o v i d e 6 " d e p t h o f L i m e T r e a t m e n t f o r s u b g r a d e in c l u d i n g p l a c e m e n t a s s h o w n o n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d $4 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 3 8 0 . 0 0 $ 6 . 9 8 $ 3 5 , 5 6 3 . 1 0 $ 5 . 1 9 $ 2 6 , 4 4 3 . 0 5 $ 6 . 4 0 $ 3 2 , 6 0 8 . 0 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 6 6 5 . 0 0 $ 6 . 6 5 $ 3 3 , 8 8 1 . 7 5 $ 1 4 . 5 0 $ 7 3 , 8 7 7 . 5 0 3. 0 7 1, 1 5 5 S Y Pr o v i d e 8 " d e p t h o f L i m e T r e a t m e n t f o r s u b g r a d e in c l u d i n g p l a c e m e n t a s s h o w n o n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d di r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r s q u a r e ya r d . $ 5 . 0 0 $ 5 , 7 7 5 . 0 0 $ 7 . 2 7 $ 8 , 3 9 6 . 8 5 $ 5 . 5 7 $ 6 , 4 3 3 . 3 5 $ 7 . 2 5 $ 8 , 3 7 3 . 7 5 $ 9 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 3 9 5 . 0 0 $ 6 . 9 3 $ 8 , 0 0 4 . 1 5 $ 1 6 . 5 0 $ 1 9 , 0 5 7 . 5 0 3. 0 8 31 0 S Y Pr o v i d e F l e x i b l e B a s e i n c l u d i n g p l a c e m e n t a s s h o w n on t h e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r s q u a r e y a r d . $1 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 . 4 2 $ 3 , 2 3 0 . 2 0 $ 8 6 . 1 0 $ 2 6 , 6 9 1 . 0 0 $ 1 7 . 0 0 $ 5 , 2 7 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 8 . 0 0 $ 8 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 3. 0 9 65 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T h i c k e n e d C o n c r e t e S l a b a s s h o w n on t h e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r $2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 2 5 . 0 0 $ 4 4 . 0 4 $ 2 , 8 6 2 . 6 0 $ 2 6 . 4 9 $ 1 , 7 2 1 . 8 5 $ 2 1 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 6 5 . 0 0 $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 2 . 5 0 $ 3 , 4 1 2 . 5 0 3. 1 0 1E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e 5 C u r b R a m p a s s h o w n o n th e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e p e r e a c h . $7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 7 7 7 . 4 6 $ 7 7 7 . 4 6 $ 5 1 6 . 6 3 $ 5 1 6 . 6 3 $ 8 2 5 . 0 0 $ 8 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 3. 1 1 5E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e 7 C u r b R a m p a s s h o w n o n th e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e p e r e a c h . $5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 3 . 5 6 $ 2 , 0 1 7 . 8 0 $ 4 0 1 . 8 2 $ 2 , 0 0 9 . 1 0 $ 9 3 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 6 7 5 . 0 0 $ 2 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 9 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 3. 1 2 39 S F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l S e g m e n t a l R e t a i n i n g W a l l in c l u d i n g r e i n f o r c e m e n t f o r t r a i l , a s s h o w n o n t h e dr a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e p e r s u r f a c e s q u a r e f o o t . $5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 . 3 6 $ 1 , 1 4 5 . 0 4 $ 8 2 . 4 2 $ 3 , 2 1 4 . 3 8 $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 5 . 0 0 $ 2 , 9 2 5 . 0 0 $ 4 5 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 5 5 . 0 0 Pa g e 1 o f 4 85 Ci t y o f C o l l e g e S t a t i o n - P u r c h a s i n g D i v i s i o n Bi d T a b u l a t i o n f o r # 1 0 - 7 1 "H i k e a n d B i k e T r a i l " Op e n D a t e : T h u r s d a y , J u l y 1 , 2 0 1 - @ 2 : 0 0 p . m . IT E M Q T Y U N I T D E S C R I P T I O N U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E UN I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E D.L. Meacham LP Ac k l a m C o n s t r u c t i o n C o . , L t d . La r r y Y o u n g P a v i n g Ki e s c h n i c k G e n e r a l Co n t r a c t o r s Du d l e y C o n s t r u c t i o n L t d . G. W . W i l l i a m s , I n c . Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s 3. 1 3 3E A Re m o v e a n d R e l o c a t e S t r e e t L i g h t a s s h o w n o n t h e dr a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e p e r e a c h $6 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 8 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 8 8 8 . 3 4 $ 2 0 , 6 6 5 . 0 2 $ 6 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 , 000.00 4. 0 1 56 S Y Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T e m p o r a r y C o n s t r u c s t i o n E x i t a s sh o w n o n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r e a c h $3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ 4 7 . 8 8 $ 2 , 6 8 1 . 2 8 $ 1 4 . 3 5 $ 8 0 3 . 6 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 . 0 0 $ 7 8 4 . 0 0 $ 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 . 5 0 $ 1 , 3 7 2 . 0 0 4. 0 2 7, 3 7 4 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T e m p o r a r y S e d i m e n t C o n t r o l Fe n c e a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p er l i n e a r f o o t . $3 . 0 0 $ 2 2 , 1 2 2 . 0 0 $ 1 . 6 6 $ 1 2 , 2 4 0 . 8 4 $ 1 . 4 9 $ 1 0 , 9 8 7 . 2 6 $ 1 . 4 0 $ 1 0 , 3 2 3 . 6 0 $ 1 . 4 6 $ 1 0 , 7 6 6 . 0 4 $ 2 . 4 6 $ 1 8 , 1 4 0 . 0 4 $ 1 . 4 0 $ 1 0 , 3 2 3 . 6 0 4. 0 3 14 E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T r e e P r o t e c t i o n a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e en g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r e a c h . $2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 1 . 0 0 $ 2 , 3 9 4 . 0 0 $ 6 6 . 0 1 $ 9 2 4 . 1 4 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 4. 0 4 1 L S Fu r n i s h a S t o r m w a t e r P o l l u t i o n P r o t e c t i o n P l a n f o r t h e wo r k t o b e p e r f o r m e d a s s h o w n i n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d di r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e p e r e a c h $5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 6 9 . 0 0 $ 9 6 9 . 0 0 $ 8 6 1 . 0 4 $ 8 6 1 . 0 4 $ 3 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 4. 0 5 7 , 1 5 4 S Y Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l C e l l F i b e r M u l c h S e e d i n g (p e r m a n e n t s e e d i n g f o r u r b a n c l a y a r e a s ) a s d i r e c t e d by t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r s q u a r e y a r d . $0 . 5 0 $ 3 , 5 7 7 . 0 0 $ 0 . 3 3 $ 2 , 3 6 0 . 8 2 $ 0 . 3 3 $ 2 , 3 6 0 . 8 2 $ 0 . 3 0 $ 2 , 1 4 6 . 2 0 $ 0 . 3 9 $ 2 , 7 9 0 . 0 6 $ 0 . 4 0 $ 2 , 8 6 1 . 6 0 $ 0 . 3 0 $ 2 , 1 4 6 . 2 0 4. 0 6 7 , 1 5 4 S Y Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l S o i l R e t e n t i o n B l a n k e t a s d i r e c t e d by t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r s q u a r e y a r d . $2 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 3 0 8 . 0 0 $ 1 . 2 4 $ 8 , 8 7 0 . 9 6 $ 1 . 2 4 $ 8 , 8 7 0 . 9 6 $ 1 . 1 0 $ 7 , 8 6 9 . 4 0 $ 1 . 3 4 $ 9 , 5 8 6 . 3 6 $ 1 . 1 8 $ 8 , 4 4 1 . 7 2 $ 0 . 9 5 $ 6 , 7 9 6 . 3 0 5. 0 1 28 4 L F El i m i n a t e 4 " S o l i d Y e l l o w P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g a s di r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r fo o t . $2 . 1 0 $ 5 9 6 . 4 0 $ 2 . 1 8 $ 6 1 9 . 1 2 $ 2 . 1 8 $ 6 1 9 . 1 2 $ 2 . 2 0 $ 6 2 4 . 8 0 $ 2 . 1 3 $ 6 0 4 . 9 2 $ 2 . 0 8 $ 5 9 0 . 7 2 $ 2 . 1 0 $ 5 9 6 . 4 0 5. 0 2 75 L F El i m i n a t e 8 " S o l i d W h i t e P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g a s di r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r fo o t . $3 . 2 0 $ 2 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 . 3 2 $ 2 4 9 . 0 0 $ 3 . 3 3 $ 2 4 9 . 7 5 $ 3 . 3 0 $ 2 4 7 . 5 0 $ 3 . 2 5 $ 2 4 3 . 7 5 $ 3 . 1 7 $ 2 3 7 . 7 5 $ 3 . 0 5 $ 2 2 8 . 7 5 5. 0 3 28 0 L F El i m i n a t e 1 2 " S o l i d W h i t e P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g a s di r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r fo o t . $4 . 4 0 $ 1 , 2 3 2 . 0 0 $ 4 . 5 6 $ 1 , 2 7 6 . 8 0 $ 4 . 5 9 $ 1 , 2 8 5 . 2 0 $ 4 . 4 5 $ 1 , 2 4 6 . 0 0 $ 4 . 4 8 $ 1 , 2 5 4 . 4 0 $ 4 . 3 6 $ 1 , 2 2 0 . 8 0 $ 4 . 2 0 $ 1 , 1 7 6 . 0 0 5. 0 4 60 L F El i m i n a t e 2 4 " S o l i d W h i t e P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g a s di r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r fo o t . $5 . 5 0 $ 3 3 0 . 0 0 $ 5 . 7 3 $ 3 4 3 . 8 0 $ 5 . 7 4 $ 3 4 4 . 4 0 $ 7 . 0 0 $ 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ 5 . 6 0 $ 3 3 6 . 0 0 $ 5 . 4 5 $ 3 2 7 . 0 0 $ 5 . 2 5 $ 3 1 5 . 0 0 El i i t A S l i d W h i t P t M k i $522,309.50 $25,938.10$361,516.62 $34,443.36 $2 9 6 , 1 0 4 . 2 5 $3 2 , 8 1 9 . 2 0 $3 2 5 , 6 5 4 . 0 0 $3 0 , 9 7 6 . 4 6 $3 4 0 , 2 9 5 . 3 8 $2 4 , 8 0 7 . 8 2 $2 8 7 , 5 2 1 . 5 2 $2 9 , 5 1 6 . 9 0 Su b t o t a l I t e m 4 . 0 0 5. 0 0 P A V E M E N T M A R K I N G S Su b t o t a l I t e m 3 . 0 0 $ 2 6 8 , 8 2 1 . 0 0 $4 5 , 2 6 7 . 0 0 4. 0 0 E R O S I O N C O N T R O L 5. 0 5 2E A El i m i n a t e A r r o w S o l i d W h i t e P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g a s di r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r e a c h . $1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 4 . 0 0 $ 2 2 8 . 0 0 $ 1 1 4 . 8 1 $ 2 2 9 . 6 2 $ 1 1 5 . 0 0 $ 2 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 2 . 0 0 $ 2 2 4 . 0 0 $ 1 0 9 . 0 0 $ 2 1 8 . 0 0 $ 1 0 5 . 0 0 $ 2 1 0 . 0 0 5. 0 6 2E A El i m i n a t e D o u b l e A r r o w S o l i d W h i t e P a v e m e n t Ma r k i n g a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e pe r e a c h . $1 6 5 . 0 0 $ 3 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 1 . 0 0 $ 3 4 2 . 0 0 $ 1 7 2 . 2 1 $ 3 4 4 . 4 2 $ 1 6 5 . 0 0 $ 3 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 8 . 0 0 $ 3 3 6 . 0 0 $ 1 6 3 . 5 0 $ 3 2 7 . 0 0 $ 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 0 . 0 0 5. 0 7 29 2 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I , 4 " S o l i d Y e l l o w R e f l e c t i v e Pa v e m e n t M a r k i n g ( 1 0 0 M I L ) a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e en g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r f o o t . $1 . 3 2 $ 3 8 5 . 4 4 $ 1 . 3 7 $ 4 0 0 . 0 4 $ 1 . 3 8 $ 4 0 2 . 9 6 $ 1 . 3 4 $ 3 9 1 . 2 8 $ 1 . 3 4 $ 3 9 1 . 2 8 $ 1 . 3 1 $ 3 8 2 . 5 2 $ 1 . 3 0 $ 3 7 9 . 6 0 5. 0 8 75 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I , 8 " S o l i d W h i t e R e f l e c t i v e Pa v e m e n t M a r k i n g ( 1 0 0 M I L ) a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e en g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r f o o t . $2 . 4 0 $ 1 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 4 7 $ 1 8 5 . 2 5 $ 2 . 4 8 $ 1 8 6 . 0 0 $ 2 . 4 2 $ 1 8 1 . 5 0 $ 2 . 4 2 $ 1 8 1 . 5 0 $ 2 . 3 6 $ 1 7 7 . 0 0 $ 2 . 3 0 $ 1 7 2 . 5 0 5. 0 9 40 9 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I , 1 2 ” S o l i d W h i t e R e f l e c t i v e Pa v e m e n t M a r k i n g ( 1 0 0 M I L ) a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e en g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r f o o t . $4 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 3 6 . 0 0 $ 4 . 1 2 $ 1 , 6 8 5 . 0 8 $ 4 . 1 3 $ 1 , 6 8 9 . 1 7 $ 4 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 3 6 . 0 0 $ 4 . 0 3 $ 1 , 6 4 8 . 2 7 $ 3 . 9 3 $ 1 , 6 0 7 . 3 7 $ 3 . 5 0 $ 1 , 4 3 1 . 5 0 5. 1 0 81 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I , 2 4 ” S o l i d W h i t e R e f l e c t i v e Pa v e m e n t M a r k i n g ( 1 0 0 M I L ) a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e en g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r f o o t . $9 . 2 5 $ 7 4 9 . 2 5 $ 9 . 6 2 $ 7 7 9 . 2 2 $ 9 . 6 4 $ 7 8 0 . 8 4 $ 9 . 4 1 $ 7 6 2 . 2 1 $ 9 . 4 1 $ 7 6 2 . 2 1 $ 9 . 1 6 $ 7 4 1 . 9 6 $ 8 . 9 0 $ 7 2 0 . 9 0 5. 1 1 2E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I , A r r o w S o l i d W h i t e Re f l e c t i v e P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g ( 1 0 0 M I L ) a s d i r e c t e d by t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r e a c h . $1 6 5 . 0 0 $ 3 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 1 . 0 0 $ 3 4 2 . 0 0 $ 1 6 8 . 8 3 $ 3 3 7 . 6 6 $ 1 7 0 . 0 0 $ 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 8 . 0 0 $ 3 3 6 . 0 0 $ 1 6 3 . 5 0 $ 3 2 7 . 0 0 $ 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 0 . 0 0 5. 1 2 2E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I , D o u b l e A r r o w S o l i d W h i t e Re f l e c t i v e P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g ( 1 0 0 M I L ) a s d i r e c t e d by t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r e a c h . $2 3 1 . 0 0 $ 4 6 2 . 0 0 $ 2 3 9 . 4 0 $ 4 7 8 . 8 0 $ 2 4 1 . 0 9 $ 4 8 2 . 1 8 $ 2 4 5 . 0 0 $ 4 9 0 . 0 0 $ 2 3 5 . 2 0 $ 4 7 0 . 4 0 $ 2 2 8 . 9 0 $ 4 5 7 . 8 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 4 4 0 . 0 0 5. 1 3 29 2 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I I , 4 " S o l i d Y e l l o w R e f l e c t i v e Pa v e m e n t M a r k i n g a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r f o o t . $0 . 6 1 $ 1 7 8 . 1 2 $ 0 . 6 3 $ 1 8 3 . 9 6 $ 0 . 6 3 $ 1 8 3 . 9 6 $ 0 . 6 2 $ 1 8 1 . 0 4 $ 0 . 6 2 $ 1 8 1 . 0 4 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 1 7 5 . 2 0 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 1 7 5 . 2 0 5. 1 4 75 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I I , 8 " S o l i d W h i t e R e f l e c t i v e Pa v e m e n t M a r k i n g a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r f o o t . $1 . 4 5 $ 1 0 8 . 7 5 $ 1 . 5 1 $ 1 1 3 . 2 5 $ 1 . 5 2 $ 1 1 4 . 0 0 $ 1 . 5 0 $ 1 1 2 . 5 0 $ 1 . 4 8 $ 1 1 1 . 0 0 $ 1 . 4 4 $ 1 0 8 . 0 0 $ 1 . 4 0 $ 1 0 5 . 0 0 Pa g e 2 o f 4 86 Ci t y o f C o l l e g e S t a t i o n - P u r c h a s i n g D i v i s i o n Bi d T a b u l a t i o n f o r # 1 0 - 7 1 "H i k e a n d B i k e T r a i l " Op e n D a t e : T h u r s d a y , J u l y 1 , 2 0 1 - @ 2 : 0 0 p . m . IT E M Q T Y U N I T D E S C R I P T I O N U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E UN I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E D.L. Meacham LP Ac k l a m C o n s t r u c t i o n C o . , L t d . La r r y Y o u n g P a v i n g Ki e s c h n i c k G e n e r a l Co n t r a c t o r s Du d l e y C o n s t r u c t i o n L t d . G. W . W i l l i a m s , I n c . Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s 5. 1 5 40 9 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I I , 1 2 " S o l i d W h i t e R e f l e c t i v e Pa v e m e n t M a r k i n g a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r f o o t . $1 . 8 5 $ 7 5 6 . 6 5 $ 1 . 8 9 $ 7 7 3 . 0 1 $ 1 . 8 9 $ 7 7 3 . 0 1 $ 1 . 8 5 $ 7 5 6 . 6 5 $ 1 . 8 5 $ 7 5 6 . 6 5 $ 1 . 8 0 $ 7 3 6 . 2 0 $ 1 . 7 5 $ 7 1 5 . 7 5 5. 1 6 81 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I I , 2 4 " S o l i d W h i t e R e f l e c t i v e Pa v e m e n t M a r k i n g a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r f o o t . $6 . 0 0 $ 4 8 6 . 0 0 $ 6 . 3 0 $ 5 1 0 . 3 0 $ 6 . 3 1 $ 5 1 1 . 1 1 $ 6 . 0 5 $ 4 9 0 . 0 5 $ 6 . 1 6 $ 4 9 8 . 9 6 $ 6 . 0 0 $ 4 8 6 . 0 0 $ 5 . 7 8 $ 4 6 8 . 1 8 5. 1 7 2E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I I , A r r o w S o l i d W h i t e Re f l e c t i v e P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e en g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r e a c h . $1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 4 . 4 6 $ 1 8 8 . 9 2 $ 9 4 . 7 1 $ 1 8 9 . 4 2 $ 9 0 . 7 5 $ 1 8 1 . 5 0 $ 9 2 . 4 0 $ 1 8 4 . 8 0 $ 8 9 . 9 3 $ 1 7 9 . 8 6 $ 8 7 . 0 0 $ 1 7 4 . 0 0 5. 1 8 2E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e I , D o u b l e A r r o w S o l i d W h i t e Re f l e c t i v e P a v e m e n t M a r k i n g a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e en g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r e a c h . $1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 7 . 4 4 $ 3 1 4 . 8 8 $ 1 5 7 . 8 6 $ 3 1 5 . 7 2 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 4 . 0 0 $ 3 0 8 . 0 0 $ 1 4 9 . 8 8 $ 2 9 9 . 7 6 $ 1 4 4 . 0 0 $ 2 8 8 . 0 0 6. 0 1 23 5 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l N u m b e r 2 B a s e E l e c t r i c a l Co n d u c t o r a s s h o w n o n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y th e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r l i n e a r f o o t . $2 . 7 5 $ 6 4 6 . 2 5 $ 2 . 8 6 $ 6 7 2 . 1 0 $ 2 . 8 7 $ 6 7 4 . 4 5 $ 2 . 7 5 $ 6 4 6 . 2 5 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 7 0 5 . 0 0 $ 2 . 7 3 $ 6 4 1 . 5 5 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 7 0 5 . 0 0 6. 0 2 4E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l P e d e s t r i a n P u s h B u t t o n s a s s h o w n on t h e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r e a c h $8 2 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 5 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ 8 6 1 . 0 4 $ 3 , 4 4 4 . 1 6 $ 8 2 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 1 7 . 5 0 $ 3 , 2 7 0 . 0 0 $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 6. 0 3 13 E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T r a f f i c S i g n s a s s h o w n o n t h e dr a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p la c e p er e a c h $3 8 5 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 5 . 0 0 $ 3 9 9 . 0 0 $ 5 , 1 8 7 . 0 0 $ 4 0 1 . 8 2 $ 5 , 2 2 3 . 6 6 $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 9 2 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 9 6 . 0 0 $ 3 8 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 9 4 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 6. 0 4 3 M O Pr o v i d e T r a f f i c C o n t r o l i n c l u d i n g l a b o r a n d m a t e r i a l s as d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r mo n t h $3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 8 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 9 4 . 4 9 $ 8 , 0 8 3 . 4 7 $ 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 5 0 0 . 00 6. 0 5 4 4 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l 1 " C o n d u i t a s s h o w n o n t h e dr a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p la c e p er l i n e a r f o o t $3 1 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 6 4 . 0 0 $ 3 1 . 9 2 $ 1 , 4 0 4 . 4 8 $ 3 2 . 1 5 $ 1 , 4 1 4 . 6 0 $ 3 0 . 8 0 $ 1 , 3 5 5 . 2 0 $ 3 3 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 5 2 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 5 2 $ 1 , 3 4 2 . 8 8 $ 3 2 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 0 8 . 0 0 7. 0 1 12 2 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l 1 8 " C l a s s I I I R C P a s s h o w n o n t h e dr a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n $5 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 6 . 3 3 $ 6 , 8 7 2 . 2 6 $ 5 0 . 9 1 $ 6 , 2 1 1 . 0 2 $ 5 5 . 0 0 $ 6 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 3 . 9 3 $ 1 0 , 2 3 9 . 4 6 $ 6 3 . 0 0 $ 7 , 6 8 6 . 0 0 7. 0 2 17 7 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l 2 4 " C l a s s I I I R C P a s s h o w n o n t h e dr a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n $7 5 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 2 7 5 . 0 0 $ 6 3 . 2 0 $ 1 1 , 1 8 6 . 4 0 $ 6 1 . 8 2 $ 1 0 , 9 4 2 . 1 4 $ 6 7 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 8 5 9 . 0 0 $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 $ 8 7 . 2 0 $ 1 5 , 4 3 4 . 4 0 $ 7 7 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 6 2 9 . 0 0 7. 0 3 4E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l 1 8 " T y p e I I S a f t e y E n d T r e a t m e n t as s h o w n i n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 9 9 . 6 0 $ 5 , 1 9 8 . 4 0 $ 9 1 0 . 2 6 $ 3 , 6 4 1 . 0 4 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 9 0 . 2 5 $ 3 , 1 6 1 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 5 0 .00 $ 4 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l 2 4 " T y p e I I S a f t e y E n d T r e a t m e n t as s h o w n i n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , $22,313.00$8,236.78 $8,599.94 $25,194.43 $8 , 8 2 9 . 1 8 $1 6 , 8 5 3 . 0 0 $8 , 9 2 1 . 0 3 $3 4 , 5 0 1 . 4 5 $9 , 0 3 8 . 5 4 $1 8 , 8 4 0 . 3 4 $9 , 0 1 3 . 4 3 $1 7 , 5 2 3 . 5 8 Su b t o t a l I t e m 5 . 0 0 $ 8 , 7 4 0 . 6 1 6. 0 0 T R A F F I C Su b t o t a l I t e m 6 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 3 1 5 . 2 5 7. 0 0 S T O R M S E W E R 7. 0 4 4 E A gy g , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e $1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 7 3 . 2 0 $ 6 , 2 9 2 . 8 0 $ 1 , 1 9 1 . 2 7 $ 4 , 7 6 5 . 0 8 $ 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 6 2 . 5 0 $ 5 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $4 2 3 , 8 2 8 . 8 6 $ 4 3 0 , 2 2 5 . 1 3 $ 4 5 0 , 8 7 0 . 1 2 $ 4 5 7 , 6 5 9 . 9 3 $ 4 6 1 , 7 6 0 . 6 4 $ 5 4 6 , 5 2 6 . 7 1 $ 6 6 6 , 3 9 7 . 3 8 A- 1 10 S T A Pr e p a r e R O W f o r t h e h i k e a n d b i k e p a t h i n c l u d i n g ex c a v a t i o n a n d h a u l o f f s p o i l m a t e r i a l a s s h o w n o n th e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e pe r S t a t i o n $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 9 1 5 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 6 . 9 5 $ 1 , 4 6 9 . 5 0 $ 3 8 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 3 1 . 2 0 $ 1 8 , 3 1 2 . 0 0 $ 2 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 1 0 0 . 00 A- 2 6C Y Ex c a v a t e A r e a s a s s h o w n o n t h e p l a n s a n d d i r e c t e d b y th e e n g i n e e r . R e m o v e m a t e r i a l s e n c o u n t e r e d t o t h e li n e s , a n d t y p i c a l s e c t i o n s s h o w n o n t h e p l a n s a n d cr o s s - s e c t i o n s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r c u b i c y a r d $2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 . 4 9 $ 9 8 . 9 4 $ 6 . 8 9 $ 4 1 . 3 4 $ 1 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 . 7 0 $ 9 4 . 2 0 $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 7 2 0 . 0 0 A- 3 85 8 C Y Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T o p s o i l i n c l u d i n g p l a c e m e n t a n d gr a d i n g a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p er c u b i c y ar d . $1 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 5 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 . 6 8 $ 1 1 , 7 3 7 . 4 4 $ 1 3 . 7 8 $ 1 1 , 8 2 3 . 2 4 $ 1 4 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 1 2 . 0 0 $ 1 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 5 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 . 0 8 $ 1 1 , 2 2 2 . 6 4 $ 3 0 . 5 0 $ 2 6 , 1 6 9 . 0 0 A- 4 86 0 S Y Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l 5 " S i d e w a l k i n c l u d i n g a l l em b e d m e n t , f i n i s h i n g , s u r f a c e t e x t u r e a n d j o i n t s a s sh o w n o n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p le t e i n p la c e p er s q ua r e y ar d . $2 8 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2 7 . 3 1 $ 2 3 , 4 8 6 . 6 0 $ 3 3 . 5 8 $ 2 8 , 8 7 8 . 8 0 $ 2 8 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 . 0 0 $ 2 7 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 A- 5 90 1 S Y Pr o v i d e 6 " d e p t h o f F l e x i b l e B a s e i n c l u d i n g p l a c e m e n t as s h o w n o n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e en g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r s q u a r e y a r d . $1 5 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 5 1 5 . 0 0 $ 1 0 . 4 2 $ 9 , 3 8 8 . 4 2 $ 8 . 6 1 $ 7 , 7 5 7 . 6 1 $ 1 7 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 3 1 7 . 0 0 $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 1 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 . 0 0 $ 2 9 , 7 3 3 . 0 0 A- 6 90 8 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T e m p o r a r y S e d i m e n t C o n t r o l Fe n c e a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p er l i n e a r f o o t . $3 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 2 4 . 0 0 $ 1 . 6 6 $ 1 , 5 0 7 . 2 8 $ 1 . 4 9 $ 1 , 3 5 2 . 9 2 $ 1 . 4 0 $ 1 , 2 7 1 . 2 0 $ 1 . 4 6 $ 1 , 3 2 5 . 6 8 $ 2 . 4 6 $ 2 , 2 3 3 . 6 8 $ 1 . 4 0 $ 1 , 2 7 1 . 2 0 A- 7 3E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T r e e P r o t e c t i o n a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e en g in e e r , c o m p le t e i n p la c e p er e a c h . $2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 1 . 0 0 $ 5 1 3 . 0 0 $ 8 6 . 1 0 $ 2 5 8 . 3 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 4 . 4 0 $ 1 9 3 . 2 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 0 . 0 0 A- 8 1, 9 6 7 S Y Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l C e l l F i b e r M u l c h S e e d i n g (p e r m a n e n t s e e d i n g f o r u r b a n c l a y a r e a s ) a s d i r e c t e d by t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r s q u a r e y a r d . $0 . 5 0 $ 9 8 3 . 5 0 $ 0 . 3 3 $ 6 4 9 . 1 1 $ 0 . 3 3 $ 6 4 9 . 1 1 $ 0 . 3 0 $ 5 9 0 . 1 0 $ 0 . 3 9 $ 7 6 7 . 1 3 $ 0 . 4 0 $ 7 8 6 . 8 0 $ 0 . 3 0 $ 5 9 0 . 1 0 A- 9 1, 9 6 7 S Y Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l S o i l R e n t e n t i o n B l a n k e t a s d i r e c t e d by t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e p e r s q u a r e y a r d $2 . 0 0 $ 3 , 9 3 4 . 0 0 $ 1 . 2 4 $ 2 , 4 3 9 . 0 8 $ 1 . 1 9 $ 2 , 3 4 0 . 7 3 $ 1 . 1 0 $ 2 , 1 6 3 . 7 0 $ 1 . 3 4 $ 2 , 6 3 5 . 7 8 $ 1 . 1 8 $ 2 , 3 2 1 . 0 6 $ 0 . 9 5 $ 1 , 8 6 8 . 6 5 A- 1 0 1M O Pr o v i d e T r a f f i c C o n t r o l i n c l u d i n g l a b o r a n d m a t e r i a l s as d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e pe r m o n t h $3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 3 5 . 0 7 $ 1 , 4 3 5 . 0 7 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0$30,515.00 $34,284.86 $2 9 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $3 4 , 3 6 9 . 0 0 $2 5 , 5 5 9 . 2 8 $2 9 , 5 4 9 . 8 6 Al t e r n a t e N o . 1 - S i d e w a l k f r o m L o n g m i r e D r i v e t o T e x a s A v e n u e Su b t o t a l I t e m 7 . 0 0 $ 2 7 , 3 7 5 . 0 0 AL T E R N A T E B I D I T E M S T A B L E Su m o f I t e m s 1 . 0 0 , 2 . 0 0 , 3 . 0 0 , 4 . 0 0 , 5 . 0 0 , 6 . 0 0 , & 7 . 0 0 Pa g e 3 o f 4 87 Ci t y o f C o l l e g e S t a t i o n - P u r c h a s i n g D i v i s i o n Bi d T a b u l a t i o n f o r # 1 0 - 7 1 "H i k e a n d B i k e T r a i l " Op e n D a t e : T h u r s d a y , J u l y 1 , 2 0 1 - @ 2 : 0 0 p . m . IT E M Q T Y U N I T D E S C R I P T I O N U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E UN I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E U N I T P R I C E T O T A L P R I C E D.L. Meacham LP Ac k l a m C o n s t r u c t i o n C o . , L t d . La r r y Y o u n g P a v i n g Ki e s c h n i c k G e n e r a l Co n t r a c t o r s Du d l e y C o n s t r u c t i o n L t d . G. W . W i l l i a m s , I n c . Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s A- 1 1 3E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l 1 0 ' T y p e 2 C u r b I n l e t a s s h o w n o n th e d r a w i n g s a n d a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e in p la c e p er e a c h $4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 2 8 . 5 2 $ 7 , 5 8 5 . 5 6 $ 5 , 7 4 0 . 2 9 $ 1 7 , 2 2 0 . 8 7 $ 2 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 2 3 2 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 6 9 6 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 5 0 0.00 A- 1 2 92 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l 1 5 " C l a s s I I I R C P a s s h o w n o n t h e dr a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n p la c e p er l i n e a r f o o t $4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 4 7 . 6 9 $ 4 , 3 8 7 . 4 8 $ 3 4 . 9 1 $ 3 , 2 1 1 . 7 2 $ 5 5 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 6 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 8 . 4 8 $ 7 , 2 2 0 . 1 6 $ 5 8 . 0 0 $ 5 , 3 3 6 . 0 0 A- 1 3 3E A Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l 1 5 " T y p e I I S a f t e y E n d T r e a t m e n t as s h o w n i n t h e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e p er e a c h $7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 8 7 . 8 8 $ 3 , 5 6 3 . 6 4 $ 6 7 8 . 1 9 $ 2 , 0 3 4 . 5 7 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 5 4 . 0 0 $ 1 , 9 6 2 . 0 0 $ 9 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 A- 1 4 86 0 L F Fu r n i s h a n d I n s t a l l T y p e C u r b a n d G u t t e r a s s h o w n i n th e d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y t h e e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e p e r li n e a r f o o t $1 8 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 . 4 6 $ 1 0 , 7 1 5 . 6 0 $ 1 7 . 7 9 $ 1 5 , 2 9 9 . 4 0 $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 A- 1 5 2E A Ra i s e E x i s t i n g S t r e e t L i g h t t o m a t c h p r o p s e d g r a d e s a s sh o w n i n d r a w i n g s a n d d i r e c t e d b y e n g i n e e r , c o m p l e t e in p la c e p er e a c h $7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 1 8 2 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 3 6 4 . 0 0 $ 7 , 2 3 2 . 7 6 $ 1 4 , 4 6 5 . 5 2 $ 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 8 6 7 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 7 3 4 . 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 400.00 To t a l B a s e B i d a n d A l t e r n a t e s 9 $5 3 3 , 9 5 5 . 3 6 $5 7 6 , 5 2 2 . 4 3 $ 6 9 8 , 5 8 9 . 2 5 $ 8 2 0 , 6 3 5 . 3 3 $154,237.95 9 9 9 9 $152,062.54 9 9 9 $1 1 4 , 7 6 1 . 7 9 9 $1 1 6 , 4 0 4 . 0 0 9 9 9 $5 7 4 , 0 6 3 . 9 3 $1 0 8 , 2 3 8 . 7 0 9 9 9 $5 5 9 , 1 0 8 . 8 2 $5 4 2 , 0 9 1 . 2 8 $1 1 1 , 8 6 6 . 1 5 9 9 9 Bi d B o n d 9 $1 1 0 , 1 2 6 . 5 0 Su b t o t a l A l t e r n a t e N o . 1 9 Ac k n o w l e d g e d A d d e n d u m s ( 2 ) 9 Ce r t i f i c a t i o n o f B i d Pa g e 4 o f 4 88 22 July 2010 Consent Agenda Item No. 2j Banner Resolution for Copy Corner To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Bob Cowell, Director of Planning & Development Services Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Resolution authorizing banners for Copy Corner recognizing the Wind Watts program. Relationship to Strategic Goals: N/A Recommendation(s): Staff recommends adopting the resolution as submitted. Summary: In recognition of City’s Wind Watts program, the owner of Copy Corner proposes to erect and display three banners at his business located at 2307 Texas Avenue South. This Resolution allows the installation and display of three 30” x 60” (12.5 sq. ft.) banners attached to existing light standards. The installation cost will be borne by the business owner. The Resolution also authorizes the banners to remain in place from 23 July 2010 to 23 January 2011. Section 7.4.E.1 of the City of College Station Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) exempts banners from UDO regulations where there has been a resolution of the City Council that finds that the display of the signs (a) promotes a positive image for the City of College Station for the attraction of business or tourism; (b) depicts an accomplishment of an individual or group; or (c) creates a positive community spirit. Lastly, staff will be reevaluating the sign ordinance and bringing a recommendation to the City Council regarding options to relax the regulations governing the use of banners such as those described above. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Banner Dimensions 2. Banner Mounting details 3. Site Plan (showing location of existing light poles) 4. Resolution 5. 89 Banner Dimensions 30” X 60” 90 Copy Corner Banner Information - Height of the light pole 25 ft Bottom of banner approximately 14.5 ft from the ground 91 - Light pole Light poles approximately 81 ft. from Texas Ave. Copy Corner Light Pole Placements 92 93 July 22, 2010 Regular Agenda Item No. 1 Capital Project Funding Presentation To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Jeff Kersten, Chief Financial Officer Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on capital project funding for the City of College Station. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Goal 1.1 Spending taxpayer money efficiently. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends the City Council receive the presentation and provide any input or direction desired. Summary: As part of a growing community, the City of College Station has infrastructure needs that must be met. The City has a capital plan to address those needs. Categories of capital projects include streets, parks, facilities, and utilities including electric, water, wastewater and drainage. The capital projects are funded in a variety of ways including, existing cash, grants, impact fees, and through the issuance of long term debt. The City is planning on issuing debt on August 26th for capital projects. This presentation will provide an overview of the funding of capital projects by the City of College Station. Budget & Financial Summary: In Fiscal Year 2010 the City has an original capital budget of $53,210,063. Attachments: 1. List of 2010 Long Term Debt Funded Projects 94 95 2010 DraftDebt Issue 7620101503 Certificates of Obligation GeneralGovernment 150000ServerConsolidationCO09017Yrs 260 000FiberOpticInfrastructureCO09027Yrs GeneralGovtTotal 410000 Governmental Other 520000ACBV Building5Yrs 520000 Governmental CO Subtotal 930000 Certificates of Obligation ElectricProjects 253000020 Yrs Water Projects 20Yrs WastewaterProjects 300000 UtilityCO Subtotal 283000020 Yrs Estimated DebtIssuance Costs 150000 Certificates of Obligation Total 3 910 000 96 July 22, 2010 Regular Agenda Item No. 2 Appeal of Variance Request Denial by the Cemetery Committee Related to Monument Size Restrictions To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Connie Hooks, City Secretary Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding an appeal by Ken and Kimberly Reynolds to the City Council on a variance request denied by the Cemetery Committee for the placement of a monument exceeding size restrictions in the College Station Cemetery. Relationship to Strategic Goals: II.1. Neighborhood Integrity – Preserving and restoring older neighborhoods Recommendation(s): Staff requests Council consideration and direction on this appeal to the City’s Cemetery Rules and Regulations. One option for the Council is to direct staff to set up a joint City Council / Cemetery Committee meeting to discuss these rules and regulations. Summary: Ken and Kimberly Reynolds have requested an appeal to the City Council on a variance request that was denied by the Cemetery Committee on three separate occasions. The Reynolds have requested a variance to the monument size restrictions contained in the College Station Code of Ordinances, Chapter 1 “G ENERAL PROVISIONS”, Section 29 “COLLEGE STATION CEMETERY RULES AND REGULATIONS”, Sub-Section J “MONUMENTS AND FOOT MARKERS IN THE COLLEGE STATION CEMETERY” for a single monument to be placed on their son’s grave space. The appeal process to the City Council is allowed for in Sub-Section M of the same ordinance. The Reynolds have made three different variance requests for the placement of a single monument in the College Station Cemetery located on Texas Ave. The Cemetery Committee considered these requests during their meetings of October 12, 2009; November 10, 2009; and June 8, 2010. Each variance request complied with the size restrictions for width and depth dimensions. However, the three requests exceeded the maximum height restrictions by thirty inches in October 2009, ten inches in November 2009, and eleven inches in June 2010. In each case the Cemetery Committee voted to not allow for any variance from the monument size restrictions. The Reynolds have elected to exercise their right of appeal to the City Council and submitted their letter of appeal to the City Secretary on June 18th. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Copy of Reynolds letter and attachments to Connie Hooks, dated June 18, 2010 2. October 12, 2009 Minutes of the Cemetery Advisory Committee 3. November 10, 2009 Minutes of the Cemetery Advisory Committee 4. June 8, 2010 Minutes of the Cemetery Advisory Committee 5. Code of Ordinances, Chapter 1, Section 29 (On file in City Secretary’s Office) 97 June 18, 2010 Connie Hooks City Secretary City Council of College Station, TX Ms. Hooks and City Council: Please accept this letter as a formal appeal to the College Station Cemetery Committee’s denial of our request for a monument variance. The monument would be placed at the gravesite of our son, Ryan Thomas Reynolds in the College Station Cemetery. We began our conversations in June 2009 with Robert Hole, Cemetery Sexton, and submitted our first request for a variance on October 6, 2009 for the October 12, 2009 meeting. We also submitted a request for a bench to be placed near Ryan’s gravesite. We attended the meeting in the hope of finalizing a formality on the monument variance and to add the bench. We did not foresee a problem since there were other monuments that were similar in size, and even larger, than the one Choate Monuments had designed for our son. These other monuments had also been placed in the cemetery within the year before our request, so nothing had changed in the way of cemetery rules, regulations, and requirements. However, our request for the monument, and the bench, was voted down even though several of the committee members voted to pass the request and were as surprised by its’ denial as we were. The chair person was unable to be in attendance that day, so that may have had an effect on the outcome as well. The meeting was led by someone other than the official overseer. (The original design of our son’s monument was similar to the gravestone of Elizabeth Pickens including a Base, Sub- base, and Die.) We feel that our son is as precious and will be missed as much as the people whose families were allowed to place the monument of their choice. I can understand the need that existed for them, and that exists for us, to in some way give some of the beauty and character of their loved one to the final monument to their lives. A precedent was set when requests were honored for monuments that were a little different in shape and size, even though I assume that most people are fine with the traditional marker. The 2nd request was made for the November 10, 2009 meeting. We adjusted the size of the Base from 8” to 6” and the Die from 48” to 36” with a 4” Sub-base remaining the same as before. (The Pickens Monument has an 8” Base with a 1” piece of granite on top, a 4” Sub-base, and approximately 4’ Die). We included a new rendering of the monument and a letter attempting to express our desire to compromise while still being able to honor our son with the monument we had chosen. We felt that reducing the height of the monument in this way would be acceptable to the committee. Also, it was important to us to finalize this process before the holidays and the upcoming anniversary of our sons’ death. This request for the monument was also denied. The bench was approved this time which was to be the same as others already placed in the cemetery. 98 Our most recent request was on June 8th, 2010. As you can see there is a window of time between the last two requests. It has been excruciatingly painful to endure this past year and to continue revisiting this issue time and time again. I have worked on this for so long, and with the encouragement to submit something different, have revised it many times trying to find something that would be approved. I have thought to let it go, but because this is our last way in which to honor the memory of our son and his beautiful life, I felt like I needed to bring this to the attention of this committee. As I wrote in the letter we sent to the cemetery committee back in the fall, we only want the ability to give our family the same opportunity to express our feelings through this monument as the other families who have endured such pain have been allowed to do. I know that a few of the monument pictures I have included are older, and that they, along with some plantings etc. that are no longer in the by-laws, were grandfathered in. But a few of them are newer as well, and the dimensions have been the same from the time those monuments were placed in the cemetery to the time that we have made our request. In my humble opinion the look of the cemetery is not altered or made unsightly by the existence of the monuments placed in various sections that are of a different style, height, or those which have a taller statue or planting. I also understand the need to retain the vision of the committee. Our proposed monument will be black granite and I believe will not compromise the desire of the city to have a cemetery that is beautiful, peaceful, and has a reasonable consistency. Randy Ferguson from Choate Monument Company has worked on this since March of 2009. He has worked with us to revise it many times but was unable to complete the new design at this last meeting in time. He sent a version that he did on the spot that was within the 30” similar to the look that I had sent him from yet another drawing. It is not appealing to us and is squashed in appearance. The new design is similar to that one in that we decided we could square off the top of the monument instead of having the rounded top, and that would compensate for the extra reduced height at the top. This brought the Die down from the original 4 feet, then to 3 feet and finally to 31” (on the taller side of the design). I have included attachments of the drawings for our proposed monuments and the short version of the final design as well as some of the other monuments within the cemetery that range in total height from 34” all the way up to over 70 “. Obviously I have not measured every monument there, but hope that this will serve as an example of the diversity in height and style that already exists. In the last letter from the cemetery committee we were told that “The overall height of this monument is 11” over the maximum height of 30”. This monument was denied due to its’ height”. This is extremely upsetting because if this is the only criteria we should have been told this from the very beginning. If this is the case I consider this extremely cruel and feel that we have been led down a road for almost a year with them having no intention of approving our request. Since the first meeting we have asked what we needed to change with no concrete suggestions but just being told that every vote varied depending on who sat on the committee that day. Obviously, we prefer one of the two original drawings, but would be content with the new measurements that I believe will still allow the design to look the way it was intended. I appreciate your time in considering our unique situation. The loss of our son has been unbearable and we just want to finalize this and have the comfort and peace of knowing that we have done the best that we could in showing how special he was and is to us through this monument. Sincerely, Ken and Kimberly Reynolds and Family 99 100 101 102 1 0 3 104 105 10 6 10 7 - -7 .. COLLEGE STATION CEMETERY ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGUtAR MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, June 8,2010,lO:OOAM CI ru OF CC~I 1.tc,t Sr,u inh The Green Room at Wolf Pen Creek 1015 Colgate - College Station, TX 77840 MEMBERS PRESENT: Sarah Adams, Chair; Weldon Kruger, Randy Matson, Virginia Reese, Sara Mirza, Bahrnan Yazdani STAFF PRESENT: Ross Albrecht, ForestryIUrban Landscape Manager; Robert Hole, Cemetery Sexton; Amanda Putz, Staff Assistant MEMBERS ABSENT: Roger Reese, James Batenhorst 1, Call to order: The meeting was called to order with a quomm present at 10:05 a.m. Requests for absences of members: Roger Reese had sent in a request for absence. Sara Mirza made a motion to approve the absence request submitted, and Virginia Reese seconded the motion. The vote was called. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. 3. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on the approval of Cemetery Advisory Committee May 4,2010 minutes: Virginia Reese made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted, and Randy Matson seconded the motion. The vote was called. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a variance request to place a footstone in the Memorial Cemetery of College StationfA~gie Field of Honor, Section FH1, Lot 54, Spaces 11 & 12 (Folev, Family #40): Discussion followed. Weldon Kmger moved that the variance request be denied, and Virginia Reese seconded the motion. The vote was called. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. 7, 8, & 9 Reynolds, Family #2547): Discussion followed concerning the variance request from the keinolds Family that was before the Committee at the meeting of June 8". The Committee moved to deny the drawing that was received as of June 7th with an overall height of 41 inches, overall length of 42 inches, and overall depth of 16 inches. While the new drawing that was received on the morning of June 8th with an overall height of 30 inches, overall length of 40 inches, and overall depth of 16 inches meets the ordinance monument size restrictions; therefore does not need Committee action. Weldon Kruger moved to approve the motion (as stated above, and Sara Mirza seconded the motion. The vote was called. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. 108 monument Page 1 of 1 From: Ken Reynolds <ken@reynoldsradio.com> Ta: Robert Hole <Rhole@cstx.gov> Oatel 6/8/2010 2:54 PM Subject: . Re: cemetery monument ". ..... ~ .... - . .,. .-, - ---- --- - - - - --- --- - - Bob: The drawing fiom Ch~ate doesn't sound at all like what we had ken discussing with them. Could you possibly forward me a copy of what they sent to you this morning? Thanks very much. Ken Reynalds On Jun 8,2010, at 11:27 AM, Robert Hole wrote: Mr. Reynolds, I presented the monument rendition you submitted on the 7th of June to the Cemetery cammittee this morning June 8th at 1Q:Q0 AM. The overall height of this monument is 11" over the maximum beight of 30". This monument was denied due to it's height. Choate monument submitted a rendition of your monument this morning June 8th. The monument depicted in the drawing by Choate monument does not need a variance since it meets the City ordinance size requirements and is approved for installation. Please let us know what you decide and thank you for ysur pqtience. Bob file://C:\Documents and Settings\rhole\Local Settings\TempV(Pgrpwise\4COE5998City of ... 711 5/2010 109 11 0 July 22, 2010 Regular Agenda Item No. 3 ST-0505 Tauber and Stasney Street Rehabilitation Project Public Hearing To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Chuck Gilman, PE, Director of Capital Projects Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion concerning approval to proceed with bidding for improvements to Tauber and Stasney Streets from University Drive to Cherry Street. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Goal I, Financially Sustainable City Providing Response to Core Services and Infrastructure. Goal IV, Improving Multimodal Transportation. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends proceeding with the advertisement for construction bids. Summary: The Tauber and Stasney Street Rehabilitation Project provides for the construction of new potable water lines, wastewater lines, a stormwater collection and conveyance system, concrete pavement and sidewalks with street trees along Tauber and Stasney Street from University Drive to Cherry Street. Staff presented this project to City Council four times between December 2008 and July 2009 to conduct public hearings and seek direction from the City Council. After multiple public hearings, and numerous meetings with the stakeholders, Staff developed a solution that was acceptable to the stakeholders, and was directed by Council to proceed with an alternative that removes head-in on-street parking along Tauber and Stasney, includes new pavement, underground utilities, street lights, 8-feet wide sidewalks meeting the Northgate sidewalk standards as specified in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), and adds parallel parking along one side of Tauber Street and one side of Stasney Street, where adequate right-of-way is available. With this current design, once this project is complete Tauber will have a total of 43 on-street parallel parking spaces between University and Cherry, and Stasney will 39 on-street parallel parking spaces. Budget & Financial Summary: A total of $3,100,899 is currently budgeted for this project ($2,252,110 in the Streets Capital Improvement Projects Fund, $305,660 in the Water Capital Improvement Projects Fund and $543,129 in the Wastewater Capital Improvement Projects Fund). A total of $1,068,930 has been expended or committed to date, leaving a balance of $2,031,969 for construction and future expenses. It is anticipated that additional funds totaling $360,027 will be needed for the Water and Wastewater components of this project. A budget transfer will be submitted to establish the additional required appropriation and these additional funds will be included in the proposed FY 2011 capital budget. Attachments: 1.) Project Map 111 U n i v e r s i t y Dr C o lle g e M ai n C h u r c h A v e N a gle St T a u b er St Sta s n e y St C h e r r y S t S e c o n d St C r o s s S t L o d g e St C h u r c h A v e Lo ui s e A v e P a t r i c i a S t C r o ss S t Tauber and Stasney Street Rehabilitation Project Location Map 112 July 22, 2010 Regular Agenda Item No. 4 Jones-Butler Extension (ST0905) Design Contract Public Hearing To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Chuck Gilman, Director of Capital Projects Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion concerning approval to proceed with engineering services for the extension of Jones-Butler from Luther Street to George Bush Drive. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Goal I, Financially Sustainable City Providing Response to Core Services and Infrastructure. Goal IV, Improving Multimodal Transportation. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends proceeding with a professional services contract to begin design on the extension of Jones-Butler Road. Summary: The extension of Jones-Butler Road is one of the transportation projects included in the 2008 Bond Authorization. The scope of the project includes the design and construction of a Major Collector from the intersection of Luther Street & Jones-Butler to the intersection of George Bush & Penberthy Road. The project will also include sidewalks, bike lanes, and an equestrian crossing. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is planning a grade separation at the intersection of George Bush & Wellborn Road to help facilitate automobile and pedestrian traffic through that intersection and the railroad crossing. Once the grade separation is constructed, Marion Pugh Road will be right-in and right-out only, with no left-turn onto George Bush. This will limit access to the West Campus of Texas A&M University for residents along this corridor and commuters that utilize Holleman and Jones Butler, and cause additional traffic on Wellborn Road and/or Harvey Mitchell Parkway. The extension of Jones-Butler will provide direct access to West Campus and also expand our transportation network in this part of the City. Budget & Financial Summary: The current budget for this project is $3,283,500. Funds in the amount of $16,867 have been expended or committed to date, leaving a balance of $3,266,633 for design and construction. Attachments: 1.) Location Map 113 L U T H E R W E L L B O R N H O L L E M A N WELSH G E O R G E B U S H DEXTER OLS E N FAIRVIEW J O H N K I M B R O U G H M A R I O N P U G H MONTCLAIR P E N B E RTH Y HARVEY MITCHELL C H R I S T I N E S O U T H W E S T HEREFORD P E R S H I N G JONES-BUTLER HIGHLANDS F I D E L I T Y DISCOVERY N E V A D A T I M M K E R R Y T H O M A S D E T R OIT A RIZ O N A P H O E NIX B A R B A R A B U S H G E O R GIA G R O V E MARYEM W I N D I N G V I L L A G E C A R O LIN A ELEANOR AYRSHIRE G O O D E LEE H O R T I C U L T U R E A N G U S B U R T SUFFOLK T O M C H A N D L E R M A R I N E R O N E Y H E R V E Y S O U T H L A N D H A I N E S O L D J E R S E Y C O R R E G I D O R S I E N N A L E G A C Y P A R K P L A C E WOODWAY TA U R U S L O N N I E S W I S S C H A L E T J O H N K I M B R O U G H OLSE N WINDINGPARK P L A C E Jones-Butler Extension Project Location Map $ Legend Jones-Butler 1 inch = 1,000 feet 114 July 22, 2010 Regular Agenda Item No. 5 Barron Road Widening Phase 2 Pre-Bid Presentation To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Chuck Gilman, Director of Capital Projects Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion concerning approval to advertise the Barron Road Widening Phase 2 Project for construction bids. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Goal I, Financially Sustainable City Providing Response to Core Services and Infrastructure. Goal IV, Improving Multimodal Transportation. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends proceeding with advertisement for construction bids. Summary: The Barron Road Widening Phase 2 project involves widening Barron Road from Decatur Drive to Barron Cutoff Road on the southwest side of William D. Fitch. Currently Barron Road is a two lane rural road. Upon completion of this project, Barron Road will be expanded to a divided four lane minor arterial roadway with medians, bicycle lanes, and sidewalks. New traffic signals will be installed at the intersection of Barron Road and Victoria Avenue, and Barron Road and William D. Fitch. The road is scheduled to be completed by August 2012, to be available for traffic accessing the new College Station High School currently under construction at Victoria Avenue and Barron Road. TxDOT has approved the AFA and given the environmental clearance for construction of the improvements in the William D. Fitch right-of-way (ROW). There is currently one private utility still located inside the ROW that must be relocated prior to advertising for construction bids. Staff is working closely with the owner of the private utility to develop the necessary agreements that will allow for the relocation to a public utility easement. Staff does not intend to award this construction contract until all the necessary utility relocations are complete. Budget & Financial Summary: Funds in the amount of $10,415,000 are currently budgeted for this project in the Streets Capital Improvement Projects Fund. An additional $150,000 is budgeted in the Water Capital Improvement Projects Fund for water components of this project. Funds in the amount of $106,971.21 have been expended or committed to date, leaving a balance of $10,458,028.79 for construction and future expenses. Attachments: 1.) Project Map 115 Barron Road Widening Phase 2 S H 4 0 / W I L L I A M D F I T C H P K W Y VIC T O RIA A V E G R A H A M R D L O N G M IR E D R D E C A T U R D R V IC T O R IA A V E B A R R O N R D E A G L E A V E A L E X A N D RIA A V E H O F B U R G D R N E W P O R T L N R E N E E L N A L E X A N D RIA A V E W E S T FIE L D D R R E A T T A L N C A R D I N A L L N P O M E L D R P A S S E N D A L E L N M A R K H A M L N STARLING DR LIE N Z L N S O U T H E R N P L A N T A T I O N D R S K Y L I N E C T S P RIN G FIE L D D R K E R N S T O W N L N D O V E H O L L O W L N C H E S A P E A K E L N B A R C H E T T A D R L A TIN N E L N D E LR E Y D R L A D O V E D R S T O N Y C R E E K L N H A LIF A X D R R E M I N G T O N C T B A R R O N C U T- O F F R D R O B E L M O N T D R S P R I N G M I S T D R C R E S T E D P O I N T D R BIT T E R N D R M A R K H A M C T NIG H T R AIN D R B A Y W O O D L N T O U R N A Y L N W IN D M E A D O W S D R F R O N T R O Y A L D R C A R L I S L E C T M U L L I N S C T FIELDSTONE PLACE S C O F F I E L D D R B R A C E Y C T T Y L E R C T SILVE R OAK DRIVE B A Y W O O D C T T R A N Q UIL P A T H D R P A M P L I N C T M U L L I N S L O O P S B E C K L E Y C T B R O U G H A M P L H A R R I S O N B U R G L N M A L L O R Y C TCOEBURN C T L A TIN N E C T F AIM E S C T S A N T O U R C T S N O W D A N C E C T P A R R O T C V S P A R T A N B UR G C T S A N M A R D R C R E E K S I D E C I R P O M E L CIR SPRING MIST DR F L O W E R M O U N D D R A L E X A N D RIA A V E 116 July 22, 2010 Regular Agenda Item No. 6 Rezoning for Spring Creek Retail & Office To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Bob Cowell, AICP, Director of Planning & Development Services Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance”, Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, specifically rezoning for Spring Creek Retail and Office Center from A-O, Agricultural Open to PDD, Planned Development District for 5 acres located at 1850 William D. Fitch Parkway. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Financially Sustainable City Providing Response to Core Services and Infrastructure, Neighborhood Integrity, and Diverse Growing Economy Recommendation(s): The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at their June 17, 2010 meeting and voted 3-1 to recommend denial of the rezoning request. Concerns were raised by the Commission regarding the safety of the U-turn movement to access the property and issues of compatibility with the neighborhood. Staff had recommended approval of the rezoning request with the condition that the note regarding the triple buffer area be removed from the concept plan. Summary: The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria for zoning map amendments: REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Suburban Commercial, which calls for concentrations of commercial activities that cater primarily to nearby residents versus the larger community or region. In addition, these areas tend to be small in size and located adjacent to major roads (arterials and collectors). The Comprehensive Plan identifies planning policies related to sensitive infill development, preservation of natural areas and the protection and enhancement of existing neighborhoods. The proposed rezoning request and accompanying concept plan includes the preservation of flood plain at the north end of the property as open space, as well the preservation of the existing pond located in the center of the property. The design of the structures on the property, buffering to the adjacent properties and uses are addressed in the concept plan review. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The property is currently zoned A-O, Agricultual Open and is surrounded by R-1, Single-Family Residential zoned property. However, only the adjacent properties to the west are developed as single-family residences. The property to the east is developed as a City Fire Station, which is a permitted use in all zoning districts. Property to the north is predominantly floodplain and is not developed. The PDD is proposing a mix of uses that include retail and office uses, which are appropriate uses under the Suburban Commercial land use designation. These uses can 117 be compatible with adjacent single-family properties when proper controls are utilized as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. The Suburban Commercial designation is intended to allow for commercial activities that cater to nearby residents. While A-O uses are compatible to adjacent single-family properties, through the PDD, additional controls can be applied that would address issues related to architectural design, size, scale, and buffering as well other specific items that are not possible under the current zoning. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The subject property is located along and takes access to William D. Fitch Parkway, a major arterial on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. A significant portion of the property is proposed to remain undeveloped, including an existing pond located at the center of the property. Additionally, there are portions of floodplain at the rear of the property that are not proposed to be developed. The proposed PDD includes commercial and office uses which are suitable for the subject property. This would include all uses allowed in a C-3, Neighborhood Commercial zoning district, with the exclusion of a freestanding restaurant, drive-thru restaurant, self storage and fuel sales. The Comprehensive Plan states that Suburban Commercial uses should cater primarily to nearby residents and should be small in size and located adjacent to major roads. As proposed in the concept plan, the subject property is 5 acres, with no structure on site exceeding 10,000 square feet, with access being taken from William D. Fitch Parkway. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The subject property is currently zoned A-O, Agricultural Open, which allows for agricultural, low-intensity residential development and open space uses. The property currently exists with one residence on site. Under current A-O zoning district regulations only one residence would be allowed on the property as the minimum lot size is five acres. The property has no connection with the neighboring residential zones. It is abutted by Fire Station #5 and the back of lots in the Spring Meadows Subdivision. Access is via a personal driveway onto William D. Fitch Parkway. Because of its size and location the subject property is not envisioned for livestock or farming. The A-O zoning designation is generally a holding zone until the subject property is ready for development. 4. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The subject property currently has limited marketability due to its zoning designation as A-O, Agricultural Open. This zoning district is intended for land which is used for agricultural, low-intensity residential, or open space uses. Given the size of the property, only one residence under the A-O zoning designation could be utilized on the property. 5. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: The subject tract is located adjacent to an 18-inch water main which runs along the south side of William D. Fitch Pkwy, as well as a 6-inch water main which is located near the southeast property corner. The subject tract is located adjacent to a 27-inch sanitary sewer main which runs along the eastern property line. The subject tract is located in the Spring Creek drainage basin. The subject tract is encroached by a FEMA designated Special Flood Hazard Area – Zone AE, which is generally located along the northern property line. Future development of this tract will be required to meet the minimum requirement of the City’s Storm Water Design Guidelines. The subject tract is located adjacent to and 118 will take access to William D. Fitch Pkwy, which is designated as a major arterial on the City’s thoroughfare plan. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN The following land uses are proposed for the PDD: natural areas of floodplain and open space; and a mix commercial and office uses. The purpose statement provided by the applicant of the PDD is as follows: “The purpose of the PDD is to develop an infill tract of land as a commercial development that will provide goods and services to the surrounding areas along William D. Fitch Parkway. The development will serve as a buffer between the existing neighborhood to the west and the Fire Station to the east side of the property and away from the neighborhood as feasible. Parking areas will be confined to behind the building facing William D. Fitch Parkway. The existing pond will remain as additional buffer and all additional neighborhood protection standards will be met.” The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria for PDD Concept Plans: 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area: The applicant has proposed retail and office uses, which would not be out of character with the surrounding area. Currently there is an existing office park operated by the Texas A&M System that is adjacent to the Stone Forest Subdivision to the south. Additionally, the proposed development would include commercial and retail uses that are intended to serve the surrounding neighborhoods, while incorporating architecture and design features that are similar in scale and type to the existing single-family residences. As proposed, the majority of the development is intended to be located on the east side of the property closest to the fire station. Additionally, the flood plain on the north side of the property is to remain as open space and the existing pond on the property is not planned for removal. 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section: The proposed concept plan is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan Amendment that calls for Suburban Commercial uses. The Suburban Commercial land use designation is generally for concentrations of commercial activities that cater to the nearby residents. The proposed development is meeting the guidelines set forth under that land use designation due to the proposed size and design of the structures and the overall lot coverage. The proposed sizes of the buildings include three buildings approximately 4,000-5,000 square feet in size and one 10,000 square foot building along the William D. Fitch Parkway frontage. Design of the buildings will consist of pitched roofs, with architectural style and design similar to that of the adjacent single-family neighborhood. Approximately a third to one half of the site is to remain undeveloped as open space, which would include the existing pond. 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development: The proposed development calls for retail and office uses, which are compatible to the existing fire station to the east and the existing single-family development to the west when the proper controls are utilized as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Minimum commercial to single-family buffer standards are proposed along the north and west 119 sides of the property and will be required to be met at the time of site plan development. Given the location of the buildings and the height limitation of one- story, the minimum buffer standards are adequate. The applicant has requested to vary from the requirement to buffer from the fire station to the east that is currently zoned R-1, Single-Family Residential. This request is in part due to the existing use of the property, as well as the fact that a buffer was provided when the fire station was constructed. 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association: Residential uses are not proposed on the property. Additionally, access to the proposed development would be taken from a lone driveway curb cut off of William D. Fitch Parkway. As part of the driveway spacing requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance, the driveway will be required to be located closest to the Spring Meadows Subdivision. This is due to the overall width of the subject property and the current location of the fire station driveway. The minimum adjacent driveway spacing requirements on major arterials is 350 feet, with the subject property having a total width of approximately 375 feet. 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities: The development includes the inclusion of a sidewalk from the proposed retail uses to the existing sidewalk located along William D. Fitch Parkway. This will be accomplished via a Private Improvement in a Public Right-of-Way permit. 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity: The concept plan includes the protection of the floodplain at the rear of the property. In addition, the minimum neighborhood protection standards as specified in the UDO, including single-family height protection and buffer and lighting standards will be required to be met. As part of the neighborhood meeting that was held, the applicant has proposed to include increased lighting standards to reduce ambient light from crossing the property line and increased landscaping adjacent to the drive through closest to William D. Fitch Parkway to address noise concerns. The development is proposing to utilize pitched roofs, with building heights being limited to one-story. At the request of the neighborhood, to help alleviate concerns regarding noise, light, and increased traffic, the applicant has removed the option for a freestanding restaurant within the development as well as parking adjacent to the neighborhood. However, a restaurant located within the 10,000 square foot retail building would still be possible, but would be limited to a maximum of 2,500 square feet in size. 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area: This development will generate approximately 53 vehicle trips in the peak hour. With the recent widening of William D. Fitch Parkway the amount of trips generated will have minimal affect on the capacity of the roadway. Furthermore, access to the site will be through one access point, a driveway meeting the minimum spacing requirement called for in the Unified Development Ordinance. Granting only one access point and having that access point operating as right in and right out movement due to the raised median on William D. Fitch will limit the amount of conflicting movements out of the site, making this access point safer. The minimum spacing requirement is also important because it is based on sight distance and 120 braking distance for the speed of the roadway. The spacing of driveways provides the motorist ample time to react to a conflicting movement making the roadway safer. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Background Information 2. Aerial & Small Area Map (SAM) 3. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes – June 17, 2010 4. Ordinance 121 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 17, 2010 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: July 22, 2010 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Spring Meadows HOA Stone Forest Owners Association Woodland Hills Development Pebble Creek Development Property owner notices mailed: 20 Contacts in support: None Contacts in opposition: 7 contacts in opposition, with concerns being property values, noise and a general desire to not see the property developed more than what is currently on site. Inquiry contacts: 1 Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on June 7th, with issues of noise, lighting, driveway location, building height and uses being discussed. ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Natural Areas – Reserved R-1, Single-Family Residential Vacant South General Suburban and Natural Areas Protected (across a major arterial) R-1B, Single-Family Residential, Thoroughfare – William D. Fitch Parkway Single-Family Residences, Stone Forest Subdivision East Institutional/Public R-1, Single-Family Residential COCS Fire Station West General Suburban / Natural Areas Protected R-1, Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residences – Spring Meadows Subdivision DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: A majority of the tract was annexed in 1983 and the remaining portion was annexed in 1995. Zoning: A-O, Agricultural Open upon annexation. Final Plat: Unplatted Site development: There is an existing house with various other small buildings. In addition a large pond is located on the site. 122 123 124 June 17, 2010 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting June 17, 2010, 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Acting Chairman Mike Ashfield, Doug Slack, Paul Greer, and Hugh Stearns COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: John Nichols, Tom Woodfin, and Scott Shafer CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: David Ruesink CITY STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Lauren Hovde, Matt Robinson, and Matthew Hilgemeier, Greenways Program Manager Venessa Garza, Transportation Planning Coordinator Joe Guerra, Senior Assistant City Engineer Carol Cotter, Assistant Director Lance Simms, Director Bob Cowell, First Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson, Action Center Representative Kerry Mullins, and Administrative Support Specialist Brittany Caldwell 1. Call meeting to order. Chairman Nichols called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Regular Agenda 2. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Rezoning for Spring Creek Retail and Office Center from A-O, Agricultural Open to PDD, Planned Development District for 5 acres located at 1850 William D. Fitch Parkway. Case #10- 00500060 (MR) Staff Planner Matt Robinson presented the Rezoning and recommended approval with the condition to remove the note regarding the triple buffer area on the concept plan. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the Rezoning. Acting Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. Jane Kee, IPS Group, stated that the applicant is implementing the Comprehensive Plan appropriately and the development would fit with the adjacent neighborhood. Mr. & Mrs. James Butcher, 4420 Spring Meadows Drive, College Station, Texas; Linda Wilson, 404 Rockspring Court, College Station, Texas; Will Welch, 4426 Spring Meadows, College Station, Texas; Troy Davidson, 404 Cold Spring, College Station, Texas; Robert Rose, Walnut Creek Court, Bryan, Texas; Chaodong Wu, 4432 Spring 125 June 17, 2010 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 2 Meadows, College Station, Texas; Bill Barkley, 912 Winged Foot Drive, College Station, Texas; Joann Grandjean, 417 Rock Spring Court, College Station, Texas; Rose Gessner, 408 Rock Spring Court, College Station, Texas. The citizens expressed concern about property values, buffer, and the safety of a u-turn. Acting Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the Rezoning. Commissioner Stearns stated that the development does not fit with the neighborhood. Commissioners Slack and Greer expressed concern about the u-turn that would have to be made for vehicles to get to the development that are going east on William D. Fitch Parkway. Commissioner Slack motioned to recommend denial of the Rezoning request. Commissioner Stearns seconded the motion, motion passed (3-1). Acting Chairman Ashfield was in opposition. 3. Adjourn. Commissioner Greer motioned to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Stearns seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0). The meeting was adjourned at 9:48 p.m. 126 127 1 2 8 1 2 9 1 3 0 1 3 1 1 3 2 July 22, 2010 Regular Agenda Item No. 7 Rezoning for Spring Creek Garden To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Bob Cowell, AICP, Director of Planning & Development Services Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance”, Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, specifically rezoning for a portion of Lot 1, Block 3 and a portion of Lots 34-36, Block 2 of the Spring Creek Garden Subdivision from A-P Administrative Professional and R-1 Single Family Residential to PDD, Planned Development District for 0.8625 acres located East of the intersection of Candace Court and Decatur Drive. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Financially Sustainable City Providing Response to Core Services and Infrastructure, Neighborhood Integrity, and Diverse Growing Economy Recommendation(s): The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at their July 15, 2010 meeting and their recommendation will be provided at the meeting. Staff recommends approval of the applicant’s request to rezone this property from A-P Administrative Professional and R-1 Single Family Residential to PDD Planned Development District. Due to the scale of the proposed development and uses proposed for this PDD, this development will serve as a transition from an industrial use to a residential use. The PDD will ensure that the structure will be developed in a manner that is complimentary to the architectural style and character of the adjacent residential uses and that a wall will be utilized to help buffer residential uses from non-residential uses. Summary: The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria for zoning map amendments: REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as General Suburban in the Comprehensive Plan and is a part of Growth Area II. The General Suburban land use designation allows for high-density single-family residential lots with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. However, neighborhood commercial and office uses may be permitted in growth areas. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of small-scale office or neighborhood commercial uses directly adjacent to neighborhoods provided that they are sensitive to surrounding residential uses and provide adequate buffering from light, noise, and parking intrusion. The proposed development is a self-storage warehouse and office building. While self- storage uses may be considered and intense commercial use, given the proposed location and scale of this development, it would serve as a buffer between the single family residential uses and the natural gas well. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The adjacent properties are currently zoned either A-P Administrative Professional and are undeveloped or R-1 Single Family Residential and PDD Planned Development District and developed for single-family uses. Staff believes the small-scale storage units and professional office uses, such as what is proposed, are compatible with the nearby properties. Issues related to noise pollution, light pollution, and the architectural 133 compatibility of the structure with the surrounding uses, which are generally associated with this type of use, are addressed through the use of the PDD zoning classification. It will ensure that the proposed structure is physically and aesthetically compatible to the surrounding residential structures. As proposed, this PDD limits the building height to a maximum of 20 feet; requires a minimum roof slope of 4:12; requires the installation of a 2-inch caliper tree every 20 feet along the perimeter of the property where adjacent to residential property; and requires the use of stone and brick on a portion of all facades of the proposed building. These provisions are in addition to meeting the standards of the Unified Development Ordinance required when developing non-residential uses adjacent to residential property. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The low traffic volumes and low use levels associated with small professional offices and self-storage warehouses make this PDD request suitable for this property. The proposed structure will serve as a transition between the natural gas well and residential land uses. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: A portion of the subject property (0.76 acres) is zoned A-P Administrative Professional and a small portion is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. The A-P Administrative Professional zoning classification is intended for commercial businesses that provide a service rather than sell a product and have relatively low traffic generation and require limited location identification. Due to the existence of a natural gas well that is located on the eastern portion of this lot and single-family residential use on the other side of the site, the number of uses usually allowed in this district may not be appropriate for this property. This property is suitable for some A-P uses (such as offices), but perhaps not desirable for all A-P uses (such as a day care). The portion of the property that is currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential is located on undeveloped property that is owned by the applicant. The total area of the R-1 properties that is included in this rezoning request is approximately 4,425 square feet. The remaining portion of these lots will still be used for residential uses. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: While the marketability of the property with the current A-P Administrative Professional zoning classification may not make it the most profitable at this time, there have been professional offices developed and requests for A-P Administrative Professional districts in the surrounding area in the past six months. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: The subject tract is located adjacent to a 12-inch water main, which runs along Decatur Drive. The subject tract is located adjacent to a 6-inch water main, which is located near the northwest property corner. The subject tract is located in the Spring Creek Drainage Basin and is not encroached by a FEMA designated Special Flood Hazard Area. Development of the subject tract will be required to meet the requirements of the City’s Storm Water Design Guidelines. The development will take access with one driveway to Decatur Drive, which is fully built as two-lane major collector with a raised median. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN 134 The applicant has provided the following information related to the purpose and intent of the proposed zoning district: “The proposed development is to provide office space and self-storage availability for the nearby residents.” In accordance with the purpose statement, the Concept Plan proposes two uses for this site. There will be one structure, which will contain a maximum of 60 self-storage units with both internal and external access. A portion of the building will also be used as leasable office space. At the time of site plan, the project will need to meet all applicable site and architectural requirements required by the Unified Development Ordinance for a C-1 General Commercial development except for those requested modifications allowed as part of the PDD zoning classification. Through this PDD, the applicant is requesting meritorious modifications to the following: · Section 7.6.F “Minimum Buffer Standards” of the Unified Development Ordinance The applicant is requesting to reduce the width of the landscaped buffer yard required when developing a commercial use adjacent to a residential use from a 15-foot buffer area to a 10-foot buffer area. To mitigate any potential negative effects of reducing the required buffer yard by 5 feet, the applicant offers to install one 2-inch caliper canopy tree every 20 feet in the buffer yard instead of every 25 feet as required by Section 7.6.F.2.b.2 of the UDO. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria for PDD Concept Plans: 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area: The site is located directly adjacent to an existing natural gas well site and is utilized by service vehicles to gain access to that site. The proposed structure, required landscaping, and masonry wall will act to buffer the surrounding residential uses and minimize any negative effects it may have on the surrounding residential uses. The architectural features of the proposed development will be consistent with those used in the surrounding residential developments. 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section: The Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use and Character Map designates this property as General Suburban and is included in Growth Area II. A General Suburban designation is generally for areas that should have an intense level of development and allows residential uses, neighborhood commercial uses, and office uses when part of a growth area. This self- storage and office building may be considered a neighborhood commercial due to the small size of the structure and the proposed design of the structure. 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development: As proposed, this commercial development will be compatible with the adjacent residential uses due to the scale and design of the proposed structure. When constructed, the building will have a maximum height of 20 feet, a pitched roof with a 4:12 to 6:12 slope, will match the architectural style of the surrounding residential structures, and have stone and brick on each façade similar to the surrounding residential structures. The proposed development will also provide access to the natural gas well site and will not require the construction of a new access point on Decatur Drive. 135 Due to the request for a smaller buffer yard between this site and the adjacent residential uses, the applicant is proposing to provide one 2-inch canopy tree every 20 feet along the perimeter of the property where adjacent to residential property in addition to a 6-foot masonry screen wall that is required by the UDO. This, combined with the 10-foot buffer yard, will in effect act as a buffer between the self-storage facility and the residential structures. The proposed development will also act as a buffer between the well site and the residential uses. The masonry wall and additional landscaping will serve to block direct light from vehicles entering and exiting the site and will reduce some effects of noise pollution that can be associated with this type of use. 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association: There are no residential uses proposed for this development. This development will take direct access to Decatur Drive and will provide access through this site to the adjacent gas well. 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities: There are no public improvements proposed with this development. 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity: Staff initially expressed concerns regarding noise and light pollution from vehicular traffic that can be associated with this type of use being a nuisance to the adjacent residential properties. However, the applicant is proposing to use a 10-foot buffer yard with increased landscaping in combination with the required 6-foot masonry wall to mitigate the effects that noise and light pollution may have on the residential uses adjacent to this site. The applicant also states on the concept plan that exterior lighting for this site will consist of building mounted lights that will be in accordance with the requirements of the UDO and that no pole lights will be used on this site. 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area: A traffic impact analysis was not required for this project due to the proposed size of the project and low levels of traffic that is generated by these types of uses. The proposed project did not generate enough trips (43 trips per peak hour) to surpass the UDO threshold of 150 vehicles trips per the peak hour. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Background Information 2. Aerial & Small Area Map (SAM) 3. Ordinance 136 NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: July 15, 2010 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: July 22, 2010 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Southern Plantation HOA Spring Creek Townhome HOA Property owner notices mailed: 11 Contacts in support: None at the time of writing this staff report. Contacts in opposition: None at the time of writing this staff report. Inquiry contacts: None at the time of writing this staff report. ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Major Arterial N/A Decatur Drive South Natural Areas-Protected R-1 Single family Residential Single-family – Spring Creek Gardens Subdivision East Urban A-P Administrative Professional Gas well West General Suburban R-1 Single family Residential Single-family – Spring Creek Gardens Subdivision DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1983 Zoning: A-O, Agricultural Open to R-4, Multi-Family (2001) to R1, Single Family Residential and A-P, Administrative Professional (2006) Final Plat: Spring Creek Gardens Phase 3 (2008) Site development: The portion of this lot being rezoned is currently undeveloped, however, the remaining portion of the lot is developed as a natural gas well. 137 138 139 140 1 4 1 1 4 2 1 4 3 1 4 4 1 4 5 1 4 6 July 22, 2010 Regular Agenda Item No. 8 103 Fairview Ave – Public Utility Easement Abandonment To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Bob Cowell, Director of Development Services Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion approving an ordinance vacating and abandoning 12.5 feet (1,679.7 square feet) of a 20-foot wide public utility easement, which is located on Lot 1R of Block 2A of the College Park Subdivision according to the plat recorded in Volume 8582, Page 96 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Relationship to Strategic Goals: N/A Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. Summary: This easement abandonment accommodates future development of this subject Lot. There are no public or private utilities in the subject portion of easement to be abandoned. The 1,679.7 square feet of the 20-foot wide public utility easement to be abandoned is located on Lot 1R of Block 2A of the College Park Subdivision according to the plat recorded in Volume 8582, Page 96 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map 2. Attachment 2 - Location Map 3. Attachment 3 - Ordinance 4. Attachment 4 - Ordinance Exhibit "A" 5. Attachment 5 - Application for Abandonment (On file with the City Secretary) 147 148 149 C:\DOCUME~1\tmcnutt\LOCALS~1\Temp\Ordinance.doc ORDINANCE NO. _________________ AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE FINDINGS AND VACATING AND ABANDONING 12.5 FEET (1679.7 SQUARE FEET) OF A 20- FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT, SAID PORTION LYING ALONG LOTS 1R AND 4, BLOCK 2A, OF THE COLLEGE PARK SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 8582, PAGE 96 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. WHEREAS, the City of College Station, Texas, has received an application for the vacation and abandonment of a portion of the 20-Foot Public Utility Easement, said portion lying along Lots 1R & 4, Block 2A, of the College Park Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Volume 8582, Page 96, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (such portion hereinafter referred to as the “Right-of-Way”); and WHEREAS, in order for the Public Utility Easement to be vacated and abandoned by the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas, the City Council must make certain affirmative findings; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That after opening and closing a public hearing, the City Council finds the following pertaining to the vacating and abandoning a portion of the Public Utility Easement described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. 1. Abandonment of the Public Utility Easement will not result in property that does not have access to public roadways or utilities. 2. There is no public need or use for the Public Utility Easement. 3. There is no anticipated future public need or use for the Public Utility Easement. 4. Abandonment of the Public Utility Easement will not impact access for all public utilities to serve current and future customers. PART 2: That the portion of the 20-foot Public Utility Easement as described in Exhibit “A” be abandoned and vacated by the City. 150 C:\DOCUME~1\tmcnutt\LOCALS~1\Temp\Ordinance.doc ORDINANCE NO. __________________ Page 2 PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this _______ day of _________________, 2010. APPROVED: ____________________________________ Nancy Berry, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ CONNIE HOOKS, City Secretary APPROVED: ______________________________ City Attorney 151 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF A 0.038 ACRE TRACT PORTION OF LOT lR, BLOCK 2A COLLEGE PARK COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 20.00 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT, SAID EASEMENT BEING A PORTION OF LOT 1 R, BLOCK 2A, COLLEGE PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 8582, PAGE 96 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTH CORNER OF SAID LOT lR, SAME BEING THE WEST CORNER OF THE REMAINDER OF LOT 4, BLOCK 2A, AND BEING ON THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF GEORGE BUSH DRIVE (VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.); THENCE: S 42O 03' 42" E ALONG THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF GEORGE BUSH DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT; THENCE: S 47' 39' 57" E THROUGH SAID LOT lR, 7.50 FEET FROM AND PARALLEL TO THE COMMON LINE OF SAID LOT 1R AND SAID REMAINDER OF LOT 4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 134.17 FEET TO THE EXTENSION OF THE NORTHWEST LINE OF AN EXISTING 10.00 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT; THENCE: S 40° 48' 59" W CONTINUING THROUGH SAID LOT 1R AND ALONG THE EXTENSION OF THE NORTHWEST LINE OF SAID 10.00 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.50 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID 20.00 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT; THENCE: N 47O 39' 57" W CONTINUING THROUGH SAID LOT lR AND ALONG THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID 20.00 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FOR A DISTANCE OF 134.45 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF GEORGE BUSH DRIVE; THENCE: N 42' 03' 42" E ALONG THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF GEORGE BUSH DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 0.038 OF AN ACRE (1679.7 SQUARE FEET) OF LAND, MORE OF LESS. BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED ON GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION. BRAD KERR REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR No. 4502 Exhibit A 152 153 C:\DOCUME~1\tmcnutt\LOCALS~1\Temp\Coversheet Medical Corridor Committees r.docx July22, 2010 Regular Agenda Item No. 9 Medical Corridor Committees To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: David Gwin, Director of Economic and Community Development Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the formation of two committees to assist with the Medical Corridor project. Recommendation(s): Staff is seeking Council direction regarding size and composition of the proposed committees. Summary: To better engage stakeholders in the Medical Corridor project, staff has identified a need to create two separate entities to provide feedback and input to both the City Council and professional project development team throughout this process; they are a general citizens’ advisory committee and a more targeted stakeholders group. The broader citizens’ advisory committee will include area residents, community leaders, City Council members, Planning and Zoning representatives, and various civic-minded stakeholders. The targeted stakeholder group will be comprised of current medically-focused tenants and property owners, other property owners, neighborhood association representatives, and other stakeholders directly affected by the development of the project. Both groups will function in an advisory capacity and will ultimately make recommendations on various aspects of this project. Staff has requested that an application for the citizens’ advisory committee be placed on the City’s website under the Citizen Committees, Boards and Commissions page. The targeted stakeholders group will be seated subsequently. Budget & Financial Summary: Staff anticipates no additional costs added to the project from the formation of these advisory committees. Attachments: N/A 154