Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/20/2004 - Regular Minutes - Parks Board (3) Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Regular Meetin Tuesday, :00 p.m. EXIT Teen Center 1520 Rock Prairie Road College Station, Texas Staff Present: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks and Recreation; Eric Ploeger, Assistant Director; Peter Vanecek, Senior Parks Planner; Scott Hooks, Parks Operations - West District Supervisor; David Wood, Parks Planner; Kristan Clann, Greenways Coordinator; Pamela Springfield, Staff Assistant. Board Members Present: John Nichols, Chairman; Larry Farnsworth; Ken Livingston; Don Allison; Jodi Warner; Glen Davis; Gary Erwin, Alternate. Board Members Absent: Glenn Schroeder Guests: Rhonda Raphael, Rock Prairie PTO; Steve Arden, Land Owner; Fred Anderson, Land Owner; Joseph and Janet Johnson, Developer; Mike Hester, Engineer; Alton Ofczarzak, Developer; Garrett Roy, TAMU Student; April Conkey, Woodway Subdivision Resident 1. Call to order. John Nichols called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. 2. Pardon r•., possible action concerning reauests for absences of members from meeting. No requests for absence had been submitted. 3. Hear visitors. Hearing none, this item was closed. 4. Discussion, consideration, and possible approval of minutes. Woodway Park Public Hearing - March 3, 2004. Don Allison moved to approve the minutes from the March 3, 2004, Public Hearing. Ken Livingston seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. Regular Meeting - March 9, 2004. Gary Erwin moved to approve the minutes from the March 9, 2004, meeting. Larry Farnsworth seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. Proposed TMPA Regional Park Site Tour - April 15, 2004. Gary Erwin stated that he had one correction to the minutes. His name had been left off of the list of those attending the tour. Jodi Warner made a motion to approve the minutes of the site tour with the change mentioned. Don A. seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Page 1 of 6 Regular Meeting of April 20, 2004 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding Woodway Park Plan. Eric Ploeger briefly discussed the history of the Woodway Park site and the public hearing that had been held on March 3, 2004. A concept had been created which incorporated items based on the input from citizens at that hearing. Peter Vanecek described the concept for the park, which included: a jogging loop/trail system (1/2 mile), a 50-space parking lot, a rentable picnic pavilion that would hold approximately 80-100 people, restrooms, a standard size playground (not a tot playground), volleyball and basketball courts, a small shelter, a nine-hole disc golf course, and three or four picnic units in the more heavily wooded area of the park. The pond, which would need some renovation, would probably include a fishing pier. The disc golf course would be separated from the areas of higher activity in the park. The walkways would be lit. April Conkey asked whether the jogging path would be concrete or a rubber cushioned surface. Peter stated that perhaps a smaller loop could be done using rubber cushioned surfacing, but the remainder would be concrete. Ms. Conkey also asked if the disc golf area and the area around the pond would be left wooded. Peter responded that some thinning would probably be done for the first couple of holes for the disc golf course and for better visibility by the Police Department. John N. added that he would prefer to see the sidewalks set back from the street. This request would be forwarded to the Public Works Department. The project should go out to bid in the fall. It would cost approximately $600,000 to construct the park, plus the land acquisition costs. The pond work was the biggest unknown factor. Don A. made a motion to adopt the concept presented as the Master Plan for Woodway Park, and Gary E. seconded. All were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. 6. Discussion, consideration, and possible action regarding Park Land Dedication requests. 111101111.1111111111111 The proposed subdivision of 22 lots required only a .22 acre land dedication. Staff was recommending acceptance of the fees of $12,232, in lieu of the land. Connectivity to nearby Windwood and Raintree Parks would be an issue to consider in the future, as the remaining property in that area is developed. Discussion with the developer and the engineer followed regarding different options for connectivity. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Page 2 of 6 Regular Meeting of April 20, 2004 ■ Edelweiss Gartens, Phase 6-11 N The proposed dedication of 6.03 acres included some detention area that would be configured for use as an open play area or practice facility. The required dedication of 3.16 acres would be located outside of the detention area. There would be good connectivity between this area and the existing portion of Edelweiss Gartens, creating a total park of 13.7 acres. Staff recommended acceptance of the land dedication. Glen D. moved to accept the dedication of the 6.03 acres of land. Don A. seconded. All were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. ■ Williams Creek Subdivision ,.► Approximately 110 single-family home sites would be developed, resulting in a required dedication of little more than an acre. There was the possibility for future phases. Staff had not come up with a recommendation, but may want to discuss with the developer the future of the entire piece of property. The tract has 70'-80' differences in elevation, the likelihood of Navasota Ladies Tresses, and streams that are under the jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers, so the developer is limited as to what can be done. The owners would have liked to dedicate land, but had not considered any specific location. After lengthy discussion, Glen D. moved to accept the fee in lieu of the land dedication, with the stipulation that the developer work with staff to determine if it would be feasible to establish a park in future phases. Don A. seconded. All were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. 7. Report, discussion, and possible action concerning requests for naming of Jack & Dorothy Miller Park jogging track. Rhonda Raphael with Rock Prairie PTO was present to request that the track at Jack and Dorothy Miller Park be named in honor of Coach Carole Weldon. Since the discussion at the April meeting regarding this, the City Council had approved the proposed "Guidelines for the Naming of City Facilities", and a petition with 28 names in support of the request had been turned over to staff. Staff recommended that this issue be turned over to the Facility Naming Subcommittee to act on, and then make a recommendation to the Board. It would probably be fall before this could be approved and a plaque created. A meeting of the Facility Naming Subcommittee was then scheduled for May 7, 2004, at noon. The Board asked for a resolution from the Rock Prairie PTO Board showing that they were in support of this project. Ms. Raphael said she would try to get this prior to the May 7th meeting. A letter from the principal of Rock Prairie Elementary was also requested. 8. Discussion, consideration, and possible action regarding potential park and areenwav joint project with the City of Bryan. A possible Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Page 3 of 6 Regular Meeting of April 20, 2004 cooperative project was being considered that would develop a linkage between College Station park property (Veterans Park & Athletic Complex) and the adjacent Texas A&M property, with 90 acres of Bryan park property through greenways and trails. Future connections could potentially go south to Lick Creek Park and north to the Brazos Center. This was a conceptual thought only and no proposal had been developed or specific land tracts designated. There was a lot of floodplain involved, but if developed, it would create a pedestrian and wildlife corridor between the sites. Steve introduced Kristan Clann, the City's new Greenway Coordinator and explained that this would involve greenway types of projects. This concept was shown on the Greenways Master Plan as part of the greenways system. This was an informational item only and no action was required. 9. Discussion, consideration, and possible action reciarding Eastgate Park Master Plan. City Council had recently elevated this project on their list of priorities and would like for it to create more of a gateway going into the neighborhood. Peter V. stated that this park had gone through a few different designs, however, the new conceptual plan included major landscaping behind the commercial buildings with raised planter beds, flowering trees, evergreen shrubs, walkways, and possibly a sculpture fountain area in the middle. The brick pavers used would match those in the islands on Texas Avenue. The park was not big enough to put in a playground or ball fields. Keep Brazos Beautiful would be contributing approximately $40,000 to help do part of the landscaping and additional funding would be requested to do the remainder of the project. This would be part of the follow-up report to City Council on April 29th (see item 10 be/ow). The total cost for the project would be approximately $180,000. In addition to Council's desire to see improvements in Eastgate Park, improvements for Eastgate had also been requested in a small area plan that had been conducted two or three years earlier. Some of these improvements had been included in the recent bond package as a result of that small area plan. Glen D. made a motion to accept the concept presented as the Master Plan for Eastgate Park, subject to a special request for funding outside of the normal budget process. Don A. seconded. Discussion followed regarding the funding of the project. Hearing no further discussion, the motion was voted on as stated, and carried five to one. 10. Follow-up report, regarding recommendations from February 26, 2004 Park Issues Report to City Council. Steve had been asked to present to Council at their April 29th meeting, a proposal to light soccer fields over a five- year period and address some neighborhood park issues. Handouts were distributed summarizing the three different options for the soccer field lights. Ten existing soccer fields had been identified as appropriate - four fields at Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Page 4 of 6 Regular Meeting of April 20, 2004 Veterans Park, three at Central, and the three new fields to be built at Veterans Park. (See attached handouts for details of the options.) Council would have to authorize debt authorization to pay for this. If that is done, then it would probably be best to group those projects as described in Option 3. The Neighborhood Park Proposal (attached) dealt with improvements to four parks - Eastgate, Steeplechase Park, Woodland Hills, and University parks. The proposal phased the improvements out, doing Eastgate and Steeplechase first. University Park would be eligible for Community Development Block Grant funds. Once Council makes a recommendation as to how many of these projects they want done and how soon, staff can move forward. This does not utilize any existing bond money or affect any other existing projects. Glen D. asked if the soccer clubs had been asked to help with the lighting project. Steve said no, they had not been asked. John N. stated that he felt both the Lighting Proposal and the Neighborhood Park Improvement Proposal were equally important. Glen D. felt it was important to explore all avenues of revenue generation in the lighting process, such as grant applications for user participation. Glen D. made a motion to endorse the general concept and the priorities as listed. Gary E. seconded the motion. No further discussion being heard, the motion was voted on and passed unanimously. 11. Report, discussion, and possible action regarding Fees Subcommittee meeting. There had been a meeting of the subcommittee and one of the items worked on had been a draft 'Athletic Field Priority of Use Policy'. The subcommittee needed to schedule another meeting to go over the draft and discuss a few other issues. Another meeting was set for Tuesday, April 27, 2004, at 4:00 p.m. Glen D. said he would like for the subcommittee to come back to the Board at the May meeting with a recommendation on 2005 user fees. 12. Report, discussion, and possible action concerning Second Quarter Park Maintenance Standards. This report had gone out in the Board packets. Steve explained that as part of the budget process, additional funds would be requested to increase the Replacement Fund from $75,000 to $100,000 per year. This would help with replacing items such as playgrounds, court resurfacing, and drinking fountains on a timelier basis. This was an informational item only. 13. Report, discussion, and possible action concerning the Capital Improvement Program. Eric P. stated that nine bids had been turned in and opened for the Lincoln Expansion Project. Six were within budget, including alternates. Approval for the contract would go to City Council at Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Page 5 of 6 Regular Meeting of April 20, 2004 their first May meeting and construction would start shortly thereafter. A groundbreaking ceremony would be held mid-May. Glen D. asked if the money for the Jack & Dorothy Miller Park exercise equipment had come out of Park Land Dedication funds. Eric said that $40,689 had come out of that fund, with the remaining coming out of the Replacement Fund. 14. Review, discussion, and possible action concerning Board and Department Goals and Objectives, and City Council Strategic Plan. Hearing no discussion, this item was closed. 15. Discussion of calendar, future meeting dates, and possible agenda items. • Presentation by Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences Department regarding conceptual plan for TMPA Regional Park N Dr. Scott Shafer had done concept plans for the park site and would be presenting them to the Brazos Valley Council of Governments on May 3rd. A notice would be sent out to the Board as a reminder. • Regular meeting on May 11, 2004 N The May meeting would be held at the TAMU Horticulture Gardens. There would be people there to answer any questions posed by the Board and to do a section by section overview of the Gardens and what it takes to keep them maintained. The board would meet at 5:30 p.m., at the site. 16. Adjourn. A motion was made to adjourn and seconded. Hearing no opposition, the meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Page 6 of 6 Regular Meeting of April 20, 2004 Park Land Dedication Ordinance Project Review Checklist Date Received: 7/2/2004 Park zone: 4 Current Zone Balance: $21.887 Project Location: East of Hwy 6 - Horse Haven Lane East of Academy Name of Development: Horse Haven Estates AltonOfczarzak Applicant: Address: 4816 Closequarters City/State/Zip: College Station, TX 77845 Phone Number/Fax: 979'693'1100 Fax Number: E-mail: Engineer/Planner: Hester Engineering Co. Address: 7607 Eastmark Drive Suite 253-B City/StateZip: College Station, TX 77840 Phone Number/Fax: 693'1100 Fax Number: E-Mail: REQUIRED COMPLIANCE Section 10-B4: Land Dedication Single Family Dwelling Units: 70 Multi-Family Dwelling Units: Total Land Requirement: 0.69 Acres Proposed Dedication: 0 Section 10-B.3: Fee in Lieu of Land Has the Planning and Zoning Commission's approval been obtained? No Land Fee: Single Family Fee ($198/dwelling unit): $198 x 70 = $13,860 Multi-Family Fee ($160/dwelling unit): Total Acquisition Fee: Section 10'13'3: Park Development Fee Single Family Fee ($358/dwelling unit): $358 x 70 = $25.060 Multi-family Fee ($292/dwelling unit): Total Fee Amounts: Total Single Family Fee ($556/dwelling Unit): $556 x 70 = $38.920 Multi-Family Fee ($452/dwelling Unit): Park Land Dedication 0/Board/Park Land Veoionnevised"w Page 1 Section 10-B-4: Park Development in Lieu of Fee Required development cost: Staff review date and comment: Parks Board review and decision: Section 10-B-5: Minimum Park Size Is the proposed park less than five (5) acres? N/A If yes, staff recommends: See last page Section 10-B-7: Prior Park Acquisition Is there an existing park that can serve the proposed development? Windwood if access is provided. Additional land dedication if Switch Station Road is abandoned; cash If yes, staff recommends: dedication if Switch Station Road is not available. Section 10-E: Comprehensive Plan Is the proposed park dedication in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Recreation, Park, and Open Space Master Plan? Comments: Section 10-F: Additional Information 1. Is land in the 100-year floodplain? Percentage: a. Detention/Retention? Size: Meets Board Policy? Acreage in floodplain: Percentage: Acreage in detention: Percentage: Acreage in greenways: Percentage: Comments: Park Land Dedication Checklist 0/Board/Park Land Dedication/checklist/Originals/Long Version Revised.xls Page 2 Section 10-F (of the Park Land Dedication Ordinance) 10-F. 1 Any land dedication to the City under this section must be suitable for park and recreation uses. Consideration will be given to land that is in the floodplain or may be considered "floodable" even though not in a federally regulated floodplain as long as, due to its elevation, it is suitable for park improvements. (a) Neighborhood park sites should be adjacent to residential areas in a manner that serves the greatest number of users. Comments: (b) Neighborhood park sites should be located so that users are not required to cross arterial roadways to access them. Comments: (c) Sites should not be severely sloped or have unusual topography which would render the land unusable for organized recreational activities. Comments: (d) Sites should have existing trees or other scenic elements. Comments: (e) Detention/retention areas will not be accepted as part of the required dedication, but may be accepted in addition to the required dedication. If accepted as part of the park, the detention/retention area design must be approved by the City staff and must meet specific parks specifications. Comments: 10-F. 2 Parks should be easy to access and open to public view so as to benefit area development, enhance the visual character of the city, protect public safety, and minimize conflict with adjacent land uses. The following guidelines should be used in designing parks and adjacent development: (a) Where physically feasible, park sites should be located adjacent to greenways and/or schools in order to encourage both shared facilities and the potential co-development of new sites. Comments: (b) A proposed subdivision adjacent to a park may not be designed to restrict reasonable access to the park from other area subdivisions. Street and greenway connections to existing or future adjoining subdivisions may be required to provide reasonable access to parks. Park Land Dedication Checklist 0/Board/Park Land Dedication/checklist/Originals/Long Version Revised.xls Page 3 Comments: (c) Where a non-residential use must directly abut a park, the use must be separated by a screening wall or fence and landscaping. Access points to the park may be allowed by the Planning and Zoning Commission if a public benefit is established. Comments: (d) It is desirable that a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the perimeter of a park should abut a public street. In all cases, the City shall approve the proposed street alignment fronting on city parks. Comments: (e) Streets abutting a park shall be built in accordance with the thoroughfare plan and the standards of this ordinance; however, the City may require any residential street built adjacent to a park to be constructed to collector width to ensure access and prevent traffic congestion. The developer may request oversize participation in such an instance. Comments: Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends a land dedication of one (1) acre (contiguous with Windwood Park) provided that the Parks Department can obtain a portion of Switch Station Road property. This would require cooperation between the two developers. If Switch Station Road is not available, then staff recommends acceptance of the fee in lieu of land. Section 10-G: Approval: Parks and Recreation Advisory At the April 20,2004 meeting the Board accepted the fee in lieu of land subject to the developer putting in a Board: dedicated easement on Horseshoe Drive,towards Switch Station Road,in order to provide access to Windwood Park. (Street name on developer's site plan shown as Horseshoe Drive,although this has not been approved by 911 and could change.) At the July 20,2004 meeting,the Board unanimously voted to table the issue of the dedication pending the outcome of the Thoroughfare Plan at the Planning and Zoning and City Council meetings. At the August 10,2004 meeting,the Board unanimously voted to stay with the original decision made at the April meeting,which was to accept the cash dedication with the stipulation that the developer provide access to Switch Station Road in order to allow residents access to Windwood Park. Planning and Zoning Commission: City Council: Park Land Dedication Checklist 0/Board/Park Land Dedication/checklist/Originals/Long Version Revised.xls Page 4 wrw.wt WNW.t.mw MOP '<W M."" AAw...fir /ruts= **".S. rw wrw rrrw. ws. (""—••—.•—.......-,...-....—.. —. �.r.tr r.rrr N 41.55'45`E a rus M.rr r.a r rrwr.•t .a.. rf ITV" a rrr,w rrsrr .ra... w.n w asst•t .rrs • ¢¢ 503.58' m ars asset ar.rr r..w r arr.r•. rrr,s —•• 6�r wrw.�nyy•.—•• ❑ M rr.s resit` rw trs rrrrr•w ars.. ••I.••••-••—••—.•• .... ` •.rwr.rt r..�.. SWITCH STATION ROAD /� .• —..�..�..—..^ all ; // �. ' Iwn% �/ ' i+ if IS• N.• 1 1 1 1 f .00 2i�iDr, 8 ..r► ` .3rw an.wt r ar.s..e / I. c� /f• '"','�i f ry: asst arwiwr r..NM CO 0,40.0116, SAM 0.1* 011.1.11111.10MA ! ` 'a , /..'',22/4"/.r r •�.! � Al MAME WM NNW II Mat MMII ••�� ill� j "f' / ! w.,.�.r« !3 ..�. I , f''Arl/jj%''//'may% 4. iv. rw.a.n.� �' ,f ..'�"""` i ��-•- t-•�I► �'..r,.l r;.,,, rw- ■r;i l !}A�,o4,�EE f/lfff •/, 1 �� �' mmh�.� N� ;� /f,{ r/Fi �l��,162r'i���f , i�'/ 'I / Ijf ;If/ P/ Q i / / A'- — p' .. �� _ .//Ii,//!f�,I,-,--.,-/,'";':///: ,1-j/ fes', /i'jlf s"' / 40 / f rte.. •`� .- \ ��r�.� r`/ , ./fes/J l�f/�f,,/'ff/�,�1,�/r.+%'w.gM�,+ '' /' / ... E.v- ii N , J j�,fl'r / /• 1 /,'' .. 'iif.7�' tar �2, cJ / ,1�„:,,,,,;:,,,,, ,,://74,7,,,,;., ,//, ' / ,,n% 4. ,, r •M .' w iir wrrw .. / / Z 3 M� N �i s %�ff f// '/I ,/`'l` LANE � wase.►e see �" gIbtiu IiillgH `�' ,,, , /%/, ,l/f,f /10'+''f,M. . n //://z-, s/s..r. iw'ir+rww .m rte'• HO N 'fl/,/1%' r„r,�,,/, %I it nu m r''/11,, 'Pl 4,-,/,-/5,,,,,,, el f! 5„,,,,,,,,,„,,,, ', ,,//-;,, _, a 1 ,,,,/,,,/, ` w it: N ,+' ,f/r/, /,/// /r�i,/'h Q 3 ,,r, ,�, r.�u 1 ,„,„:,.,-7! f,./i/,/,,=22;/,./,/,,-/,,,,,2,-..!„, 'J/i ', , d(j 1 ',,,,l r —ra arc n.owa.r �' i N r ''';:4,".. ',;,•:'.'1,;?;', ;!:,;',.':'+ /I I , V ,//%////%;','": 1:'::;2/, .11 , . �.r'f,+, aim "�.„0::,;,;,/,/,/,/,;/,/,*, ,,, %'/,f 111/' ll,j'I� ''/r .'' es „''i„ /', ,, , ami rrnc ' --°- � '',"://,',';',:;' ,./:;',•„'=';`,',";<' / f i i ,/i' / �'/ ' ",” '/' �, r a.rsr w u..veilV W W52 .. i ,��'✓,f/ //, /r/' ����I•�j,/�r �,ff�, , , ,�/ i', r ;,,,,,,,s,�f f Hg.-...c,. tYRSEBRCrt C ,_2::_____.. ��i� I//, , ,,,f/J'r/ ,,i,; /,'I/,',7,,;lf 'wws�i ."'"r..V,"/,',;,24; '1,47/',, , l,,';', ,!� w sa.r' "S SL•j I/ / �fj � ,/'1i. ,'%" ''2' '''//l//,��'/i'//�ff''.~'y, , ..' ' ''f'/%/,, l s:6. 47 I, : rrru•a, ..rsv , I ' fel' / , /// , 40 / �//,./// jt:�jll'�/J/+'/'I,2/Sd,1j%f�/'/i`'+/ Ef#/',/�":"'/‘;;',2 ;4 }- -• 5!/w air. j <//22;/•/4/2/%/:'V,"l ''''';;;// i'// ;%/�/f 7 1%4 ,''// fl,/i' 'J,'fi 9/4:�l/`,f, a0i % ,///j / ,//' ,f ,�'/ l /%:;',;''f% %//%,r';';'f�,,', //// �ar J ' , l°/ ,1, r , , , ,j'/,r, r.+rc aara ras s / , C'..�'7 f +,,t/ "'://4":',7;;;',"-;%,//,'; ''r ,s r/+ I s', ,,, /' i r.ra.era/art>• f /� ' /,,r , /• ,/I/, /,,,, ';';;;,');%;;;0';'////'/07,2;;C:••//:2, f,I,l ,i'„I,,, If+ '%// ''/, / '/i/ /,� fr//fj , '/I/%,i l,f',, I fr'/'////f'+' •I/f 4,'://,':',';';';';',%="/;;4';':i `/ ,r f Z/:•'%'/f/'/;X:'/,� /, ,// '// /�%///:///////4Z-1/4','/,', i','I i/ „ , r-r rrrr ,•';•<'''''../4;%:%;:%:;`,';':::;;; :',2;''''///7://'.:"://;;":' if / ',1i////�i i,f j' '�l,i//,�//�,, ra't""w+a i+m+w� I , , s// /�f 1/f%,' ryl ,/,j / ,11''x;,,, , /:% 1,/,', I„i .s.sr..r. MASTER CORf / f,//,:'/, 11//// 2,74%',', %:-',-",%;'.:4%;/:',0',2';' 'i',if/'j f//I ',i 11/” ', /, .',:•22;/.;;/:'2.:';'' ,; NOT FOR RECORD /,•, /. ''',;,'-';',',',',222, /,''';',14',/,',//',/,',/,',/,'''',/,':' ',' 'f / HORSE HAVEN ESTATES' %/,' / ark .wrR �l � 126.3 ACRES i f////fd'�iI vr: *WOK PM as r ,/,'4' 1// /'If , ',/,:j://Z//// /,/j',/r i i / , MORGAN RECTOR LEAGUE A-4b ,,/,',/s,>;/../474,,,, '/fj/' N�"�, / , f/, I�f,�, ,/,,,�/f 1�/, ,//j i/, COLLEGE STATION,BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS I ,,1 Nom, a. ,,,r , , , , 2°,94/S5,1,"52;-)23////42.2//44();V:', "'• i,/, j f; f�,f',''�`j,�, i'''� ,//////:////114 JULY i'200 CAL5 i"=I00' . /lir f;/,/r ,/.,2,?:/ r �,,,//,r',' i' r moi'If", „ , //://27, ,/',",://,',:,;>:/,',"1:;.1k,////,,,%,,,�,4,,/.(,NN/, �.. ,,l fl,/ ,f/ �/ j I 11, !.Iri''/I//,/�� 7 f /,'/,l/',",: ,/e� '7 - ,, ,f„ ,fl�, ,i,�',�f/l�,---jff�,Ir / ///////,,,,/,,,,,,/,4,,/,,c,„,„, , , I / , ' .t'.'u+j _..�..�.._.. -.. i'jll, -,%.e.',//, ', ,/,,, , i/ /, lir, i,i////,i/, ,/l,/// °ot t.. I I, s/,,,' ,, ,//r ,LN PREPARED BY: ana.w awe” ' 4',',/,'//' .'.,4":.;</'�.,-.." ' //22,7,/,.'",',/4.,'-',.:;‘,2,2,',/I I,/ 12',////,'/,',/,7,22;,//,',/ , ,i I ,,i f ff ,` �, aw.r a.r ,,//„/ ,.'',/274-2..2': ''' %''' + , . • /f,l / r;' ', ' I ��'w.o NESTER ENGINEERING COMPANY AlTONtED FOR: /4/134 '',, , , . , r ,S..2.26 26`W ,4• ••--- '/ ',,_ '// /„� +- / /, /,,, 2953.99. 1 ,!7607 E E STATIN TX SU.255-8Ak-TON E.EGUARTf, ti� � �,I t ,l�' j,/ "'i /'•/ / , / I, i i COLLEGE STATION.TX77840COLEGES TATIO ,T M ',r " , � Ir ' �, , r i�/'rT•+.. , r979-693-1100COLLEGE 57ATION,TX77845 . /i'I /Ir r I%I :ll,;,l//J:///:.� :�'�^�'/,' SURVEYED BY: MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP 2551 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH,ST. A COLLEGE STATION.TX 77840 979-693-5359 Park Land Dedication Ordinance Project Review Checklist Date Received: 7/28/2004 Park zone: 3 Current Zone Balance: $50.249 Project Location: 1001 Krenek Tap Road Name of Development: Waterwood Condiminiums Applicant: Jim Stewart Address: 4200 Woodland Park Court City/State/Zip: Arlington,Texas 76013 Phone Number/Fax: 817-994-4663 Fax Number: 817-429'8664 E-mail: Engineer/Planner: Mitchell & Morgan, LLP Address: 511 University Drive Suite 204 City/StateZip: College Station,Texas 77840 Phone Number/Fax: 260'6963 Fax Number: 260'3564 E-Mail: v©mitchellandmorgan.com REQUIRED COMPLIANCE Section 10-B-1: Land Dedication Single Family Dwelling Units: Multi-Family Dwelling Units: 64 Total Land Requirement: 0.51 Acres Proposed Dedication: 0 Section 10-B-2: Fee in Lieu of Land Has the Planning and Zoning Commissions approval been obtained? Land Fee: Single Family Fee($198/dwelling unit): Multi-Family Fee($160/dwelling unit): $160 x 64=$10,240.00 Total Acquisition Fee: Section 10-B-3: Park Development Fee Single Family Fee ($358/dwelling unit): Multi-family Fee($292/dwelling unit): $292 x 64 =$18,688.00 Total Fee Amounts: Total Single Family Fee ($556/dwelling Unit): Multi-Family Fee ($452/dwelling Unit): $452 x 64 = $28,928.00 Park Land Dedication Checklist ma"""mPamLand o"^ic"/mo/co°"xlist/origm°m/Lm,oVersion e°,m°u.°m Page 1 Section 10-B-4: Park Development in Lieu of Fee Required development cost: Staff review date and comment: Parks Board review and decision: Section 10-B-5: Minimum Park Size Is the proposed park less than five (5)acres? N/A If yes, staff recommends: Section 10-B-7: Prior Park Acquisition Is there an existing park that can serve the proposed development? Central Park If yes, staff recommends: Acceptance of parkland dedication fee Section 10-E: Comprehensive Plan Is the proposed park dedication in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Recreation, Park, and Open Space Master Plan? Comments: Section 10-F: Additional Information 1. Is land in the 100-year floodplain? No Percentage: a. Detention/Retention? NO Size: Meets Board Policy? Acreage in floodplain: 0 Percentage: Acreage in detention: 0 Percentage: Acreage in greenways: 0 Percentage: Comments: Park Land Dedication Checklist 0/Board/Park Land Dedication/checklist/Originals/Long Version Revised.xls Page 2 Section 10-F(of the Park Land Dedication Ordinance) 10-F. 1 Any land dedication to the City under this section must be suitable for park and recreation uses. Consideration will be given to land that Is in the floodplain or may be considered"floodable" even though not In a federally regulated floodplain as long as, due to its elevation, It Is suitable for park improvements. (a) Neighborhood park sites should be adjacent to residential areas in a manner that serves the greatest number of users. Comments: (b) Neighborhood park sites should be located so that users are not required to cross arterial roadways to access them. Comments: (c)Sites should not be severely sloped or have unusual topography which would render the land unusable for organized recreational activities. Comments: (d) Sites should have existing trees or other scenic elements. Comments: (e) Detention/retention areas will not be accepted as part of the required dedication, but may be accepted in addition to the required dedication. If accepted as part of the park, the detention/retention area design must be approved by the City staff and must meet specific parks specifications. Comments: 10-F. 2 Parks should be easy to access and open to public view so as to benefit area development, enhance the visual character of the city, protect public safety, and minimize conflict with adjacent land uses. The following guidelines should be used in designing parks and adjacent development: (a) Where physically feasible, park sites should be located adjacent to greenways and/or schools in order to encourage both shared facilities and the potential co-development of new sites. Comments: Park Land Dedication Checklist 0/Board/Park Land Dedication/checklist/Originals/Long Version Revised.xis Page 3 - Comments: (c) Where a non-residential use must directly abut a park, the use must be separated by a screening wall or fence and landscaping. Access points to the park may be allowed by the Planning and Zoning Commission if a public benefit is established. Comments: (d) It is desirable that a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the perimeter of a park should abut a public street. In all cases, the City shall approve the proposed street alignment fronting on city parks. Comments: (e) Streets abutting a park shall be built in accordance with the thoroughfare plan and the standards of this ordinance; however, the City may require any residential street built adjacent to a park to be constructed to collector width to ensure access and prevent traffic congestion. The developer may request oversize participation in such an instance. Comments: Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends acceptance of the parkland dedication fee. Section 1O-G: Approval: Parks and Recreation Advisory At the August 10,2004 meeting, the Board voted unanimously to accept staffs Board: recommendation to accept the cash dedication of$28,928 in lieu of land. Planning and Zoning Commission: City Council: Park Land Dedication Checklist u/Bond/PamLand oowcatio"/coeckmmzrigmals/LonaVersion nvvised.,m Page 4 33, I . ..... -,--,4,,,,„,,,,,,---t-,. .-_,,..., i ij 4 pp ' >...,,,i,,,,,,,,...-A-..4,4k4:60=ii.' -.4....,;-,t ..„, 1=it.. „, . - ,,,,...----,,,, . f 1 . ,, ,r;.'','L ;„: , ::.;:, 0 t ,;,5> 1:',-1''''1 -''' _...11,,1':,1,, .',„ , , ', , 1 k1'111121Z,k11,4r .1„ 1 I ' 1 11 :,,,1 i 1 1 1 1 1 , r,.ia' ,tirr- j',:i , -,i.,,,, ' ,, ,,,,..,, ,'' ,,I,i ,„, :,.....:.,,,,;,it,,,ot„...:7[,,, 1 : w - �� Y "i 1._.. �1 ! I vsw v �.,. 13?feAt'; i „•=•••• i4.=,,3 4 .. ,,.,.ii.„.,„.,,,•„..,:4atz,..,,,,,,,,,,....„,,,,„,,los„ __ _. . , .. E Atli ),..,,,,. a ' ,t cy • •.m.rn.,—i', 1111 ,.,. .4 —., ,, rK_'• 'iW. ,, .rI. , gig 1 ' ? gt •J i1 i IIS I ' l' ''''''''' - o Yr }' .y ti L • 3 Ell 71 m� m 1Muwa �I"Mn SITE PLAN Mitchell do Morgan, L.L.P %h Conaulking Engfn6era and C°natrvct0ro Il 511 Univeroiiy UYive East, Suite 20i. i ,1i ,,,:,„n .t, 3,t�' i") WATERWOOD CONDOMINIUMS PHASE 3 0O1iege Staucn, Tx 77E484_035,4 ..!6'33;:::11. ;t; 029)260-6963 fax:(979)2 '•a• MEMORANDUM DATE: August 10, 2004 TO: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board FROM: Jane R. Kee, City Planner RE: Proposed Revisions to Chapter 9, "Subdivision Regulations", Section 10, "Parkland Dedication Ordinance" Although the 3-year review of the parkland ordinance is not due until January 2005, this amendment is being brought forward to address some current issues. Below is a summary of the proposed changes. 1. Developers have expressed interest from time to time in installing park improvements themselves rather than waiting for the City to do so. Current regulations do not provide for this to occur when parkland has already been dedicated to the City. This amendment addresses that. 2. Current regulations require the dedication of the entire parkland with the first phase of any development.This amendment will provide for the dedication to occur no later than the second phase.. 3. Changes to the process for"Fee in Lieu"considerations: Currently all parkland dedications go to the Board, even ones where very small amounts of land are required. This amendment allows for the Board to consider anything 3 acres or more OR any development with floodplain or greenway and make recommendation to the Commission. The amendment further allows for the PARD staff to decide on required dedications of less than 3 acres where there is no floodplain or greenway involved. The Director may forward the case to the Board. 4. Developer improved parkland requirements: ✓ Plans must be approved by the Board ✓ Value of improvements must meet or exceed the development fee ✓ Improvements shall be guaranteed prior to any final platting v Improvements shall be complete within 2 years ✓ Board may allow up to one 12-month extension ✓ One-year warranty period with a bond is required 0 SECTION 10: REQUIREMENTS FOR PARK LAND DEDICATION 4.9A)404 10-A. Purpose This section is adopted to provide recreational areas in the form of neighborhood parks as a function of subdivision and site development in the City of College Station. This section is enacted in accordance with the home rule powers of the City of College Station, granted under the Texas Constitution, and the statutes of the State of Texas, including, but not by way of limitation, TEXAS LOCAL Gov'T CODE CHAPTER 212 (Vernon 1999; Vernon Supp. 2004). It is hereby declared by the City Council that recreational areas in the form of neighborhood parks are necessary and in the public wel- fare, and that the only adequate procedure to provide for same is by integrating such a requirement into the procedure for planning and developing property or subdivisions in the city, whether such development consists of new construction on vacant land or rebuilding and remodeling of structures on existing residential property. Neighborhood parks are those parks providing for a variety of outdoor recreational opportunities and located within convenient distances from a majority of the residences to be served thereby. The park zones established by the Parks and Recreation Department and shown on the official Parks and Recreation map for the City of College Station shall be prima facie proof that any park located therein is within such a convenient distance from any residence located therein. The primary cost of neighborhood parks should be borne by the ultimate residential property owners who,by reason of the proximity of their property to such parks,shall be the primary beneficiaries of such facilities. Therefore, the following requirements are adopted to affect the purposes stated above and shall apply to any land to be used for residential purposes: 10-B General Requirements The City Manager or his designee shall administer this SECTION 10,REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKLAND DEDICATION. Dedications shall cover both land acquisition and development costs for neighborhood parkland for all types of residential development. Dedications shall be based on actual dwelling units for the entire development. Increases or decreases in final unit count will require an adjustment in fees paid or land dedicated. If the actual number of dwelling units exceeds the original estimate additional parkland shall be dedicated in accordance with the requirements in Section 10 with the filing of a final plat. The methodology used to calculate fees and land dedications is attached hereto as Appendix 1 and incorporated and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. 1. Land Dedication For single family developments the area of land to be dedicated for parkland purposes shall be equal to one (1) acre for each one hundred and one (101) dwelling units. For duplex and other multi-family development this area shall be equal to one (1) acre for each one hundred and twenty-five(125)dwelling units. The total amount of land dedicated for the development shall be dedicated in fee simple by plat: • prior to the issuance of any building permits for multi-family development, or where a plat is not required under the Unified Development Ordinance or Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances,or • prior to the filing of any final plats for single family, duplex or townhouse development, except for a phased development, where the park shall be platted at the time that the first phase of the development is platted. Access to the parkland shall be available no later than the second phase of the development.. 2. Fee in Lieu of Land July. 04 revisions "O"JANE"PARKLAND"2004 Parkland Ord" <:).46 A landowner responsible for dedication under this section may elect to meet the requirements of 10-B.1. in whole or inart bycashpayment p a in-lieu-of land, in the •• amount set forth below. Before making this election, for any required dedication of three 4041/4 (3) acres or more, or for any development containing floodplain or greenway, the land owner must obtain a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission pursuant to the plat approval procedures set out in ARTICLE 3.3 OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AND CHAPTER 9. The payment in-lieu-of land shall be calculated as required below. The amount of the fee-in-lieu of land is a fee that shall be sufficient to acquire neighborhood parkland. The price shall be computed on the basis of one hundred ninety- eight dollars ($198.00)per dwelling unit for single family development and one hundred sixty dollars($160.00)per dwelling unit for duplex and multi-family development. The total amount of parkland dedication fee calculated for the development shall be remitted: • prior to the issuance of any building permits for multi-family development, or where a plat is not required under the Unified Development Ordinance or Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances, or • upon submission of each final plat for single family, duplex or townhouse development. Fees may be used only for acquisition or development of a neighborhood park located within the same zone as the development. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to accept a fee-in-lieu of land for dedications of less than three (3) acres where there is no floodplain or greenway if there is a sufficient amount of parkland existing in the park zone of the proposed development or the dedication is not sufficient for a Neighborhood Park site. This determination shall be made based on the Recreation, Park & Open Space Master Plan, as amended from time to time. 3. Park Development Fee In addition to the land dedication, there shall also be a fee established that is sufficient to develop the land to meet the Manual of Neighborhood Park Improvements Standards to serve the zone in which such development is located. This fee shall be computed on the basis of three hundred fifty-eight dollars ($358) per dwelling unit for single family developments and two hundred ninety-two ($292) for duplex and multi-family development. The total fee shall be paid upon submission of each final plat or upon application for a building permit, whichever is applicable. Fees paid under this Section may be used only for development or acquisition of a neighborhood park located within the same zone as the development. 4. Park Development Option in Lieu of Fee A developer may elect to construct the neighborhood park improvements in lieu of paying the park development fee required under Section 10.B.3 under the following terms and conditions: a. PARD staff will work with the developer to devise a concept plan for the neighborhood park development. Within twelve (12) months, the developer shall submit detailed plans and specifications in compliance with the concept plan to The City Manager or his designee for review. b. All plans and specifications shall meet or exceed the Manual of Neighborhood Park Improvement Standards in effect at the time of the submission. c. Cost estimates shall be determined by the PARD staff and this estimate must meet or exceed the fee required in 10.B.3. July. 04 revisions "O"JANE"PARKLAND"2004 Parkland Ord" <#.1, , d. If the improvements are constructed on land owned by the Developer, the process of financial guarantee shall be the same as that found in Section 7 of the Subdivision r401(11,x Regulations. e. If the improvements are constructed on land that has already been dedicated and/or is owned by the City, then the Developer must post payment and performance bonds to guarantee the payment of all subcontractors and suppliers and to guarantee Developer completes the work in accordance with the plans, specifications and ordinances and improvements are accepted by the City. f. The construction of all improvements must be completed within 2 years from the date of the approval of the plans and specifications by the Parks and recreation Advisory Board or upon completion of the development whichever occurs first. One extension of up to twelve (12) months may be granted upon written request to the City Manager or his designee. g. Financial Guaranty - The Developer shall post a financial guarantee for 100% of the estimated cost of the improvements. This guarantee shall be filed with Development Services upon submission of the first final plat or building permit, whichever is applicable. The financial guarantee on land owned by developer will be released after the following requirements are met: • Improvements must have been constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications • All parkland upon which the improvements have been constructed has been dedicated as required under this ordinance • All manufacturer's warranties have been provided for any equipment • A certificate of final completion has been issued by the City Manager or his designee h. Upon issuance of a certificate of Final Completion, Developer warrants for a period of one (1) year as per the requirements in the Manual of Neighborhood Park Improvements Standards. The City Manager or his designee shall release the financial guarantee provided all warranty work has been completed and accepted by the City. i. The City may draw down on the financial guarantee if: • Developer fails to complete the improvements • Developer fails to complete any warranty work • Developer fails to dedicate the land on which the improvements are constructed j. Developer shall be liable for any deficiency between the amount of the guarantee and the cost of completion of the installation of improvements or the amount of any warranty work. 5. Reimbursement for City Acquired Parkland The City may from time to time acquire land for parks in or near the area of actual or potential development. If the City does acquire park land in a park zone, the City may require subsequent parkland dedications for that zone to be in cash only. This will be to reimburse the City for the cost of acquisition. Once the City has been reimbursed entirely for all such park land within a park zone, this subsection shall cease to apply, and the other subsections of this section shall again be applicable. 10-C Prior Dedication;Absence of Prior Dedication Credit shall be given for land and/or money dedicated pursuant to Ordinance 690 or 983. If a dedication requirement arose prior to passage of this section, that dedication requirement shall be controlled by the ordinance in effect at the time such obligation arose, except that additional dedication shall be required if the actual density of structures July.04 revisions "O"JANE"PARKLAND"2004 Parkland Ord" 4, constructed upon property is greater than the former assumed density. Additional dedica- tion shall be required only for the increase in density and shall be based upon the ratio set A‘A forth in 10-B. of this section. 40r At the discretion of the Planning & Zoning Commission, any former gift of land to the City may be credited on a per acre basis toward eventual land dedication requirements imposed on the donor of such lands. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board in exercising its discretion under this subsection. • 10-D Special Fund; Right to Refund There is hereby established a special fund for the deposit of all sums paid in lieu of land dedication under this section or any preceding ordinance, which fund shall be known as the park land dedication fund. The City shall account for all sums paid in lieu of land dedication under this section with reference to the individual plats involved. Any funds paid for such purposes must be expended by the City within five (5) years from the date received by the City for acquisition and/or development of a neighborhood park as defined herein. Such funds shall be considered to be spent on a first in,first out basis. If not so expended,the owners of the property on the last day of such period shall be entitled to a prorated refund of such sum, computed on a square footage of area basis. The owners of such property must request such refund within one (1) year of entitlement, in writing, or such right shall be barred. 10-E Comprehensive Plan Considerations The Recreation, Park and Open Space Master Plan is intended to provide the College Station Parks and Recreation Advisory Board with a guide upon which to base its recommendations. Because of the need to consider specific characteristics in the site selection process, the park locations indicated on the Plan are general. The actual locations, sizes, and number of parks will be determined when development occurs. The Plan will also be used to locate desirable park sites before development occurs, and those sites may be acquired by the City or received as donations. Park Zones are established by the City's Comprehensive Plan, in the Park and Open Space element and are configured to indicate service areas for neighborhood parks. Zone boundaries are established that follow key topographic features such as major thoroughfares, streams, and city limit lines. 10-F Parkland Guidelines and Requirements Parks should be easy to access and open to public view so as to benefit area development, enhance the visual character of the city, protect public safety and minimize conflict with adjacent land uses. The following guidelines and requirements shall be used in designing parks and adjacent development. 1. Any land dedicated to the city under this section must be suitable for park and recreation uses. The dedication shall be free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances that interfere with its use for park purposes. The City Manager or his designee shall determine whether any encumbrances interfere with park use. Minerals may be reserved from the conveyance provided that there is a complete waiver of the surface use by all mineral owners and lessees. A current title report must be provided with the land dedication. The property owner shall pay all ad valorum tax or assessments owed on the property up to the date of acceptance of the dedication by the City. A tax certificate from the Brazos County Tax Assessor shall be submitted with the dedication. 2. Consideration will be given to land that is in the floodplain or may be considered "floodable" even though not in a federally regulated floodplain as long as, due to its elevation, it is suitable for park improvements. Sites should not be severely sloping July. 04 revisions "O"JANE"PARKLAND"2004 Parkland Ord" or have unusual topography which would render the land unusable for organized recreational activities. 3. Where feasible, park sites should be located adjacent to greenways and/or schools in1100'A order to encourage both shared facilities and the potential co-development of new sites. 4. Neighborhood park sites should be adjacent to residential areas in a manner that serves the greatest number of users and should be located so that users are not required to cross arterial roadways to access them. 5. Sites should have existing trees or other scenic elements. 6. Detention/retention areas will not be accepted as part of the required dedication,but may be accepted in addition to the required dedication. If accepted as part of the park, the detention/retention area design must be approved by the City Manager or his designee and must meet specific parks specifications in the Manual of Neighborhood Park Improvements Standards. 7. A proposed subdivision adjacent to a park may not be designed to restrict reasonable access to the park from other area subdivisions. Street and greenways connections to existing or future adjoining subdivisions may be required to provide reasonable access to parks. 8. Where a non-residential use must directly abut a park,the use must be separated by a screening wall or fence and landscaping. One access point may be required by the City Manager or his designee. 9. It is desirable that a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the perimeter of a park should abut a public street. In all cases, the City shall approve the proposed street alignment fronting on city parks. 10. Streets abutting a park shall be built in accordance with the thoroughfare plan and the standards of this ordinance; however, the City may require any residential street built adjacent to a park to be constructed to collector width to ensure access and prevent traffic congestion. The Developer may request oversize participation in such instance. 10-G. Consideration and Approval Any proposal considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission under this section shall have been reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board or the City Manager or his designee as provided herein, and a recommendation given to the Commission. The Commission may make a decision contrary to such recommendations only by a concurring vote of at least five(5) members. 10-H. Review of Dedication Requirements The City shall review the fees set forth in this section every three (3) years. The City shall take into account inflation as it affects land acquisition and park development costs as well as the City's targeted level of service for parkland per one thousand population. Fees shall be set by resolution of the City Council. July. 04 revisions "O"JANE"PARKLAND"2004 Parkland Ord" APPENDIX 1 PARK LAND DEDICATION FEE METHODOLOGY I. Current Level of Service 7 Acres Neighborhood&Community Park Land per 1,000 Population 3.5 Acres per 1,000(Neighborhood Parks) 3.5 Acres per 1,000(Community Parks) II. Land Requirements Neighborhood Parks 3.5 Acres/1,000 1 Acre per 285 people 2000 CENSUS Figures-Total Population-67,890 2.80 Persons per Household (PPH) for Single Family and 2.28 Persons per Household for Multi- Family based on census information for owner and renter occupied units. The overall average from the Census is 2.52 persons per household(dwelling unit). SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY 285 people/2.80 PPH= 101 DUs 285 people/2.28 PPH= 125 DUs 1 Acre per 101 DUs I Acre per 125 DUs III. Neighborhood Park Acquisition Costs(Determines Fee in Lieu of Land) (Assumption) I acre costs$20,000 to purchase SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY $20,000/ 101 DUs=$198 per DU $20,000/ 125 DUs=$160 per DU IV. Neighborhood Park Development Costs(Determines Fee for Development) • Cost of Average Neighborhood Park in College Station is$300,000. • One Neighborhood parks serves 2,341 people based on a Census population of 67,890 being served by 29 parks(count includes neighborhood parks and 6 mini parks). • It costs$128 per person to develop an average intergenerational neighborhood park. Single Family Multi-Family $128.00 X 2.80 PPH=$358 per DU $128.00 X 2.28 PPH =$292 per DU V. Total Fee Single Family Multi-Family $198 + $358 =$556 $160+$292 =$452 July. 04 revisions "O"JANE"PARKLAND"2004 Parkland Ord" 6,„A Draft City of College Station Parks and Recreation Dep artmeZ< Neighborhood Park Improvements Standards Park Development in Lieu of Fee I. Site Plan Development A. Neighborhood park site plans will be provided by the developer with input from the Parks and Recreation Department staff. B. Site plan development may require public hearings before the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. This will be at the discretion of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. C. All site plans will require Parks and Recreation Advisory Board approval. City Council approval may be required as needed. D. The park development budget is required to be equal to or greater than the required development fee of the development. Budget estimates will be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department staff. Excess amounts over the required development fee are not transferable to other projects. II. Park Furnishings A. In order to maintain consistency with other parks, park site furnishings will require approval from the Parks and Recreation Department staff. A list of approved items will be provided. Alternate substitutions must be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department staff in advance of construction (see attached). Specifications of all park furnishings will be provided for approval by Parks and Recreation Department staff. B. All items will require a one (1) year warranty from the day of acceptance by the Parks and Recreation Department. C. All park construction will be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Department staff and other City inspectors for quality control. III. Construction Documents A. All construction documents must be sealed by a design professional. 0:/Projects/Neighborhood Parks/Neighborhood Park Improvement Standards.doc Page 1 of 5 B. All construction documents must be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department staff before construction. C. All projects over the amount of $50,000 will require approval from the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulations. Approval is the responsibility of the developer. IV. Project Acceptance Procedures A. Upon notice of completion, a Parks and Recreation Department representative will make arrangements for the inspection of work and preparation of a punch list within ten (10) calendar days of contractor (developer) notification. B. Upon contractor (developer) notification that final completion of the punch list items has occurred, the Parks and Recreation Department representative will inspect the project and, if completion is confirmed, issue a certificate of completion. C. As built plans of all site items, utilities and landscaping will be provided following construction. D. Certificate of completion will not be delivered until as-built plans are received and warranty security has been provided. V. Warranty Required A. All materials and equipment provided to the City shall be new unless otherwise approved in advance by the City Manager or his designee and that all work will be of good quality, free from faults and defects, and in conformance with the designs, plans, specifications, and drawings, and recognized industry standards. This warranty, any other warranties express or implied, and any other consumer rights, shall inure to the benefit of the City only and are not made for the benefit of any party other than the City. All work not conforming to these requirements, including but not limited to unapproved substitutions, may be considered defective. This warranty is in addition to any rights or warranties expressed or implied by law. Where more than a one (I) year warranty is specified in the applicable plans, specifications, or submittals for individual products, work, or materials, the longer warranty shall govern. O:/Projects/Neighborhood Parks/Neighborhood Park Improvement Standards.doc Page 2 of 5 This warranty obligation shall be covered by any performance or payment bonds tendered in compliance with this Ordinance. B. Defective Work Discovered During Warranty Period. If any of the work is found or determined to be either defective, including obvious defects, or otherwise not in accordance with this ordinance, the designs, plans, drawings or specifications within one (I) year after the date of the issuance of a certificate of Final Completion of the work or a designated portion thereof, whichever is longer, or within one (I) year after acceptance by the City of designated equipment, or within such longer period of time as may be prescribed by law or by the terms of any applicable special warranty required by this ordinance, Developer shall promptly correct the defective work at no cost to the City. During the applicable warranty period and after receipt of written notice from the City to begin corrective work, Developer shall promptly begin the corrective work. The obligation to correct any defective work shall be enforceable under this code of ordinances. The guarantee to correct the defective work shall not constitute the exclusive remedy of the City, nor shall other remedies be limited to the terms of either the warranty or the guarantee. If within twenty (20) calendar days after the City has notified Developer of a defect, failure, or abnormality in the work, Developer has not started to make the necessary corrections or adjustments, the City is hereby authorized to make the corrections or adjustments, or to order the work to be done by a third party. The cost of the work shall be paid by Developer. The cost of all materials, parts, labor, transportation, supervision, special instruments, and supplies required for the replacement or repair of parts and for correction of defects shall be paid by Developer, its contractors, or subcontractors or by the surety. The guarantee shall be extended to cover all repairs and replacements furnished, and the term of the guarantee for each repair or replacement shall be one (I) year after the installation or completion. The one (I) year warranty shall cover all work, equipment, and materials that are part of the improvements made under this section of the ordinance. 0:/Projects/Neighborhood Parks/Neighborhood Park Improvement Standards.doc Page 3 of 5 Acceptable Neighborhood Park Site Furnishings BENCHES - Powder coated steel, as manufactured by Victor Stanley # CR-196, 6' long with vertical steel slats or equal. DRINKING FOUNTAINS - Concrete fountains, with dual height bubblers, exposed aggregate finish as manufactured by Haws # 3150 or Stern Williams ADF-3700-C. BASKETBALL GOALS/BACKBOARDS - Aluminum backboards, painted white, fan shaped Gametime #854 or equal - Goal, Gametime breakaway type, #874 or equal - Galvanized post, cantilevered, Gametime #459, 32" extension, 3-1/2" diameter post (or equal). PLAYGROUNDS - Playgrounds to be manufactured of steel and plastic with powder coating paint system for steel parts. - Playgrounds to be a commercial type versus residential use type. - Acceptable manufacturers include: - Gametime - Little Tykes - Landscape Structures - Playworld Systems - Burke - Columbia Cascade - Recreation Creations PLAYGROUND SURFACING - Poured in place rubber cushioning for playground units - Installed at 1-1/2"-2" thick for a 6' high fall (for play units). - 3/8" pea gravel with 3/8" rubber granule mix, 12" total thickness of gravel and rubber granules (for swing sets) - Acceptable manufacturers include: - Rubber cushioning installers - Surface America - Playtop - Robertson Industries - Gametime - Rubber granules available from4-D Corporation, Duncan, Oklahoma AREA LIGHTS - Light poles to be direct burial concrete poles 12-16' height above grade. 0:/Projects/Neighborhood Parks/Neighborhood Park Improvement Standards.doc Page 4 of 5 - Manufactured by Ameron or Traditional Concrete, Inc. - Light fixtures to be an acorn-shape or antique style, 175-watt minimum metal halide lamp. BASKETBALL OR TENNIS COURTS - To have Plexipave or equal, acrylic paint surfacing system or equal, on top of concrete. SHELTERS - Shelters to be constructed with galvanized steel columns and framing, painted. - Roof to have composition shingles (25-year) with wood decking under shingles. SIGNAGE - Park signs to be constructed of Cylex (concrete/plastic composite material) with etched letters. BRIDGES - Park bridges to be constructed of Corten self-weathering steel with treated pine decking. - Manufacturers: - Continental - Steadfast Bridges - Canyon Creek Iron Works PICNIC TABLES - Picnic tables to be aluminum, 6 or 8' long, heavy-duty frame (can be aluminum color or painted) Gametime #796 or 798, or equal. BIKE RACKS - Bike racks to be Loop design, painted steel, in-ground mount Gametime #7702 or equal. BBQ GRILLS - Grills to be galvanized steel, in-ground installation, 24" square, 360-degree rotation, Gametime #51 or equal. Black color. SHADE COVERS FOR PLAYGROUNDS - Shade covers to be constructed with galvanized, painted posts and framing with polypropolene mesh. 0:/Projects/Neighborhood Parks/Neighborhood Park Improvement Standards.doc Page 5 of 5 Recreation, Park, and Open Space Master Plan Needs Assessment Time Line • July—Met with Development services to begin gathering demographic data • August—Preliminary Meeting with Parks and Recreation Advisory Board • September— December—Community wide Survey— Currently discussing the possibility of this being done as a student project through the Recreation, Parks and Tourism Sciences Department at A&M. If this does not work out, then an alternate method of survey will be done, possibly through Utility bill mail out. • September/October—Focus Group Meetings— These will be meetings with such groups as Soccer Clubs, Little League, Teen Advisory Board, Senior Advisory Board, of Xtra Education Program etc. They will be hosted/facilitated by the program supervisor and/or Superintendent • November—Public Hearing- Open forum conducted by Parks Board, possible with an outside facilitator • December-January—Analysis of data from various meetings and survey. • February—Ranking of program needs by staff and a separate ranking by Parks Board • March—Finalize rankings and include results in Parks Master Plan update PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT USER FEES Staff ACTIVITY/FACILITY 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Comment ABasketball than PER TEAM �� 1. Basketball $265 Discontinue 2. Flag Football $340 $340 $340 $355 $355 3. Volleyball $140 $175 $175 $175 $175 4. Softball A Play-Off League(Spr&,Sum) $360 $360 $375 $390 $340 Play-Off League(Fall) $315 $315 $330 $345 $340 Fast Pitch(Sprg.,Sum) $375 $375 $400 $400 $380 Fast Pitch(Fall) $325 $325 $340 $340 $380 YOUTH SPORTS PER CHILD 1. Basketball $30/20/10 $40/35 $40/35 $45/40 $45/40 2. Flag Football $35125/15 $40/35 $40)35 $45/40 $45/40 B 3. Girl's Softball $35/25115 $40/35 $45/40 , $50/45 $50/45 4. Youth Volleyball $40/30/20 $40/35 $40/35 $45/40 $45/40 5. Challenger Sports $15.00 $15 $15 $15 $15 INSTRUCTION FEES PER PERSON 1. Swim Lessons $30 $35 $35 $35 $35 2. Adv.Swim Lessons $35 $40 $40 $40 $40 3. Water Fitness Pass-Fail,Spring or Summer Pass t '', Water Fitness Pass-Winter Pass ".,n..,..r' 'Z C 4. TAM Swim Team $85/65/45 $85/75 $85/75 $85/75 $85/75 5. National Jr.Tennis League $50 $50 $50 $85 , $85 6. Tennis Lessons(+1 can of balls) $35/person $40 $40 $45 $45 7. Golf Discontinued PAVILION RENTALS PER DAY 1. Bee Creek Pavilion $75 $75 $75 Monday-Thursday $75 $75 Friday-Sunday&Holidays $100 $100 2. Central&Southwood Pavilions Monday-Thursday $75 $100 $100 $100 $100 Friday $100 $175 $175 $175 $175 Saturday&Sunday&Holidays $175 $175 $175 $175 $175 D 'Deposit NEMEMIMMI $100 $100 $100 3. Oaks Pavilion $75 75 $75 Monday-Thursday $75 $75 Friday-Sunday&Holidays $100 , $100 'Deposit $50 $50 $50 4. W.A.Tarrow Park Pavilion s,: "�¢ 5. Thomas Pavilion $15 $15 $15 Discontinue WOLF PEN CREEK AMPHITHEATER Private-Weekday $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 Private-Weekend $250 $250 $250 $250 $250 Non Commercial-Weekday $425 $425 $425 $425 $425 E Non Commercial-Weekend $525 $525 $525 $525 $525 Professional/Commercial-Weekday $800 $800 $800 $800 $800 Professional/Commercial-Weekend $900 $900 $900 $900 $900 CONFERENCE CENTER(See Attached Rates) Approved by Parks Board May 11,2004 Staft ACTIVITY/FACILITY 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Comment LINCOLN CENTER 1.Membership(19-54 yrs),per year $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 Youth $10 $10 $10 Low Income Eligible $5 $5 $5 $10 $100 5 Adult $15 $15 $15 $15 $15 2. Non-Member Guest Pass(youth or adult) $I/.. $1/day $1 Si $1 Non-Member Summer Rate(youth or adult) $30/summer $30 $30 $30 3. *Gym(8 hr.block/day)deposit $150/8hrs $200/8hours $200 $250 $250 Hourly/Half Court(4 hr max) $15 $15 $15 $20 $20 Hourly/Full Court(4 hr max) $25 $25 $25 $30 $30 Gym Event $.30/Chair 5.30/Chair $.30/Chair $.30/Chair All Day Usage(more than 4 hrs) $125 $175 $175 $175 $175 Concession Usage $10 $15 $15 $20 $20 4. Fitness Pass ''''''';'4: , F Senior Fitness Pass , ',':.-�t 5. 'Game Room Rental Per Hour(2 hr.min. $10 $20 $20 Deposit $50 $50 $50 6. 'Teen Room Rental Per Hour(2 hr.min.) $10/2 hr min $10/2 hr min $10 $20 $20 Deposit $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 7. 'Community Room Rental(max.3 his) $25 $30 $30 $50 $50 Additional per hr $15 $20 $20 $20 $20 Deposit $50 $75 $75 $75 $75 Kitchen Fee $10 $15 $'15 $20 $20 8. "Special Event Fee(Funerals,weddings,parties) $150 $150 $150 9. Miscellaneous Charges Copies $.10/Copy $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 Faxes $2.00/fax $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 ATHLETIC FIELDS 1. Softball&Baseball:" Single field rentaVday $60 $60 $60 $60 $60 Single field rentaVweekend $100 $100 $100 two(2)field complex/day $200 $200 $100 $100 51(10 two(2)field complex/weekend $350 $350 $175 $175 $175 three(3)field complex/day $100 $100 $'150 $150 $150 three(3)field complex/weekend $175 $175 $275 $275 $275 'Deposit per day/weekend 550/5100 $50/$100 $50/$100 four(4)field complex/day $200 $200 $200 four(4)field complex/weekend $350 $350 $350 G 'Deposit per day/weekend Varies, Varies Varies 2. Soccer: Onell)field:per day $60 $60 $60 $60 $60 Complex:per day $200 $200 $200 Complex:per weekend $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 Veterans Park and Athletic Complex Six(6)Fields:Per Day $400 $400 Per Weekend $700 $700 3. Field Rentals/Per Hour(1/2/3 hrs)' $10/15/20 $10/15/20 $10/15/20 $10/15/20 $10/15/20 4. Liehts for field rentals(per hour) $5 $5 RACE EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1. Printing Stop Watch $10 $10 $10 2. Stop Watch $5 $5 $5 3. Cones(101 $10 $10 $10 4. Bases,Poles,and Flagging(10) $10 $10 $10 5. Big Time Clodc $50 $50 $50 6. Water Cooler $5 $5 $5 H 7. Ice Chest $5 $5 $5 8. Tables $10 $10 $10 9. Traffic Flags and Vests(10) $5 $5 $5 stopwatch,10 cones,10 bases/poles and flagging,2 water $75 $75 $75 stopwatch,30 cones,20 bases/poles and flagging,6 water $100 $100 $100 stopwatch,60 cones,30 bases/poles and flagging.12 water $125 $125 $125 Approved by Parks Board May 11,2004 ----- ----' Staff . A~""""" 2005 Comment TEEN CENTER(THE EXIT) 1. Non Member per clay $1 2. Membership yet year $10 $10 $10 3. Meeting Room Rental Per Hour $15 Deposit $50 $50 $50 4. Dance/Game Room Rental Per Hour $25 $25 $25 Deposit $50 $50 $50 5. Whole Facility Rental Per Hour $50 $50 $50 U Deposit $75 , $75 $75 6. Additional Attendance Fee Per Hour z*� mn�� u^ � $10 ' $10 $10 51-100 Attendees $15 , $15 515 100-200 Attendees $20 $20 $20 7. Special Programming mm $10 ,No $25-$100 $25-$1$25-$100s �uo ~~.^~-^'.~...''~�'..^.'..~."''�'.^.".',.^.^~...^�,.'.°...'"....'.°'.''.~,,'.'~.�..'=~.^.".,~..'..yr,.^.°~.........�,.,"...°........ „�.....,......"...,.....°...-,.^.^..,,..,,.,.`...,.......". VENDOR PERMITS $50 | $50 | $50 $50 $50 K . Approved by Parka Board May v/,2004 Statf AC 1VITY/FACILITY 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Comment SWIMMING POOLS _ 1. General Admission(3 yrs&up) Haltaran/Thomas $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.50 $2.50 Natatorium $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 Adamson $3.50 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 2. Discount Pass(25 swims) Hallaranffhomas $50 $85 $40 $50 $50 + Natatorium $40 $85 $40 $40 $40 'Adamson $75 $85 $85 $85 $85 3. Family Season Pass Halloran/Thomas $125 $125 $125 $125 $125 Natatorium $125 $125 $125 $125 $125 `Adamson $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 4. Individual Season Pass Halloran/Thomas $60 $60 $60 $60 $60 'Adamson $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 5. Babysitter Season Pass Hallaran/Thomas $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 'Adamson $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 6. Special Day Care Fee 0 Adamson Lagoon Per Child $2.75 $2.75 $2.75 7. Pool Rental(2 hours) Hallaran: 25 people or fewer $75 $100 $100 $100 $100 50 people or fewer $100 $125 $125 $125 $125 51-76 people $150 $175 $175 $175 $175 77-102 people $200 $225 $225 $225 $225 Each hour after intial 2 hours $50 $75 $75 $75 $75 Thomas/Natatorium: 25 people or fewer $65 $90 $90 $90 $90 50 people or fewer $75 $100 $100 $100 $100 51-76 people $100 $125 $125 $125 $125 77-102 people $125 $150 $150 $150 $150 Each hour after intial 2 hours $50 $75 $75 $75 $75 Adamson: 99 people or fewer $250 $275 $275 $275 $275 199 or fewer $300 $325 $325 $325 $325 299 or fewer $400 $425 $425 $425 $425 300+ $500 $525 $525 $525 $525 Each hour after intial 2 hours $100 $125 $125 $125 $125 8. Pool Parties Per Person* Theme Party:Southwood and Thomas $5.75 $5.75 $5.75 Adamson Lagoon $7.50 $7.50 $7.50 General Party Southwood and Thomas $4.75 $4.75 $4.75 Adamson Lagoon $6.50 $6.50 $6.50 Catered Theme Party:Southwood and Thomas $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 Adarrson Lagoon $9.25 $9.25 $9.25 General Catered Party:Southwood and Thomas $6.25 $6.25 $6.25 Adamson Lagoon $8.50 $830 $8.50 Pavilion Party(Four table limit):First Table $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 Additional tables $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 9. Other Pool Fees Texas SuperGuard Competition Per Person $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 Swim Diaper Fee Per Diaper $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 Tube Rental Fee $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 Deposit $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 Locker Rental Fee $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 Deposit $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 Junior Lifeguard Program Per Person Per Session $55.00 $65.00 $65.00 Guard 2-B Per Person,Per session $55.00 $65.00 $65.00 Duda Derby(Sponsor a duck July 4th)Per Person $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 Contest on July 4th,Per Person $300 $3.00 $3.00 'Schools Out Blow Out at Adamson Lagoon $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 Pool Trout Fish Out Per Person(Ages 3 and up) $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 Over the 5 fish limit(Per Fish) $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 10. Educational Class Rental(1 hour/non exclusive) $25 $25 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Approved by Parks Board Wy 11,2004 Staff Comment Adult Sports Recommendations: A . -The restructuring of the leagues to eliminate weekend tournaments will change the fees. Youth Sports Recommendations - - No recommended changes for CYO5. Instruction (Tennis Programs): - No recommended changes for CYO5. Pavilions: No recommended changes for CYO5. Wolf Pen Creek Amphitheater: � - No recommended changes for CYO5. Lincoln Center: ' - No recommended changes for CYO5. Athletic Fields: ~~ - No recommended changes for CYO5. Race Equipment: H - No recommended changes for CYO5. Swimming Pools (Other Pool Fees): ` -No recommended changes for CYO5. Teen Center: - No recommended changes for CYO5. Vendor Permits: � - No recommended changes for CYO5. 4046 "cd Water Fitness Class New Pass System Thanks to Marsha Naus and Shirley Volk for helping us with the details for the new pass system that will kick off with the Fall season in Septemeber 04. The new passes will be available for sale on August 9th at the Central Park Office. Due to the fact that we have so many varied schedules for the month of August and we are in a transitional period, all water fitness classes will be free for the remainder of the month of August for those that have been participating(class max of 40). Seasonal Pass Outline A. Fall Pass $80.00 September, October, November(approx 65 class days) B. Winter Pass $60.00 December, January, February(approx 45 class days) C. Spring Pass $80.00 March, April, May(approx 65 class days) D. Summer Pass $80.00 June, July, August(approx 65 class days) Positive Points for the Program Guests can join a pass holding member by paying regular pool admission of$2.50 when they arrive at the facility. Prospective new corners are welcomed to a free trial class to check us out. Class size will be held to a 40 maximum participants to ensure quality instruction and safety for all. The Parks Buck program will be available to help offset costs for anyone interested in participating. Be sure to call Dana at 764-3472 or Jenny at 764-3442 for details. City of College Station Parks and Recreation Advisory Board List of Subcommittees/Board Liaisons Fiscal Year 2004-05 By-Laws Subcommittee Glenn Schroeder, Jeannie McCandless Fees Glenn Schroeder, Larry Farnsworth,/Gary Erwin - c i C&tot Park Naming e - � � pp U ,,��nn � IM4? , __�_ � 1 e9U/Kgeker, Gary Erwin , CIAAIA, O Recreation, Park, and Open Space Master Plan Don Allison 101 Veterans Park & Athletic Complex, Phase II ......................................Jodi Warner, Larry Farnsworth, Gary Erwin, (John Nichols, ex-officio member) i)citiinuku) Wolf Pen Creek Oversight Committee ............................... Jodi Warner, Glenn Schroeder (Alternate) 0/Board/Subcommittee/List of Sub 2004-05 Updated:August 5,2004 should help maintain provideinthehghqualityiemployeesotheiz ditatehthseoCfity of h College Stationtheservicesof t College Station. -X4-',4i.f',:::•,--,..- - ,7 4 :'--,4r :5.'.0:*"1. s* 1 t-,i„..,7.,,,, r" wi llpromote a large range of recreational : c:itura/ arts opportunities. Theproposed budget includes resources to continue funding the Parks and Recreation Department at current service levels. .-4t, '`,1--.40t-f-aft,glisil‘1, .,t _ ,,,,,„ ,I.,. "A.v .-•"„.;',..1114 'fi , „Iwo, ..--.. ..._- ,fe4S`'%*" ''''.''Pi'4,9 'Cr. litrA3f7:4" ,._‘'-'17 ,, 1:;,4!" '4''3-, ',16i..f'It. 6 ,1,4, 4., ' 1.. .',,-A aprevv 0'. e:,.•,-.- ° ' „,,.. ..4,,,_ ,„k,„.., e,..A;,,,,,:.i3-:,i 4'-.: .„2. .::- ,.--.t - ' ..,a, ,, , , xitivo-s*TiVe. , ' V.,... 4-1'.,- ..,,v..;, 4,4'*"., ;•::!'„?,,t--.,,,„-),:..`A4 4''A,N, ,--. .7., i,„ tii,,,, „_,.4 , . . -5,i, .., -tir,',1,-,,,t,-,;,...9.0-,tr. :'*-2.-'''''''''''''- ._ •r, ,f'-- . ,,4,,,7:---:,,,,,,,, ,,,,y,.A4t,...47707:,-it';',r,1 ,- 4.-..:- „ - =',;-',,"---:`.6""-'4"-4,:•1-*- „ ,,,t '''41,1V,-- 7.'' '7 ' v4f -7 ' --v4;%-t,:i''-:' - -. -'--'t.,,,,,,'''',-;•4'$44,%.”- '';' ,. year /Id'=:0„) .4.-..4 %.,...-- -4 c, -.,^1 . ..'4 ' '1";t1g,t;'''',5?<:"=”..-', ,,,•et'- -t:,,,,,,,-1...;w- ,Vg,,,a'a;* '-tWatfe.:a f,-= --\-s.s'',7 4'; -*-*" 4'Y'-' ''t.' ' '1',4' '''' -griresi- • **-"-w;...-'4,., -t,.. ...t.4,4" 41,,- „,....),S/P4-4'. 61-1- ---: .--. *,''';::::4- .,-,S..5'. .°.- ,zy,-.64...-411-444.4-‘`WAM:_,1.,::;.-•,...-_-,,„ - - `-..- 4?, '"tf4442*Y'x*Y'uttt._.k"':'-vv-'-e':-:--Atrgf'ftV,',;:: 't, Ita ' ,--,, s•Irifatt't-A--Atki:c •,--„b_%,k=,...`-'tf,..1,".Y1 4,-,-.14,44:4 ' •-•.,„,..,..7-„,,, .:.,,:- 4,,,w,*,,71,..4,...tt,t,,afr4A,_ s, .,. . , .„,.., „ ,.., .%""" .,,V,A.•'. VA-4h ."- ' 1-i-1".='''' 'I'' - ,.., 'AtAw"asla,e44..t,AW ,..,:-." , ,,,--.. 4.;,,,, ,:tzt,,,w ..-s,,---n--;. 0'.::Lti?t,-::: %11;11-i`ne).1M74 -t-,-,,,i'z4‘,',F.',;,-,:'''--t'',4 4:!,', ,;:- :•,'",' ' '''- -': • •'`or=.---2.-"‘, ''".",..*4,,,.., A' ' - • D Additional operations and maintenance for the operations ,,, ..socm-MIT,Eark4 rations and maintenance costs of $11, 726 areorincjolhudned ,g & c been Crompton (Woodway Parkt ,,,, i10,-FRA,- ---- in the proposed budget > • ' 1 '—' "tkr,A1:4i .- 5's 4 •,-. . Z",.„1- .W714...a.,,,+•!-;.a..e-11): FniT , ,..., 'a 41Wq4'.' *-714,,i:.‘;l'f44T:r-5'*141"),e c a'u-'s e- the' park is not expected ,,...,.-----,-- t..,., .... -4, ye bU:get tor only i to be complete before the last quarter of the year. li :.,,,,,,t. .: -,-.4 -,, --,'-.51---..t--.,,,,,t.,,viniltwyz,it,..or in - , S. n )=. The FY 05 proposed- -budget also includes $150, 000 publicfor, art,, , College Station. It is anticipated that projects will bedone i Northgate and at Veteran's Park. It is anticipated that a > An additional projects at the City centre. These $330, 000 is included in the proposed budget for futuze public art . 3 year main operating p d to come from the 5 total of $1 million will allocated over a resources are proposed to Fund,.' the General eriod• funds of the City; Electric Fund, ,I. Water Fund, Wastewater Sanitation Fund. ,,,":2'i i.,:,,,,.41 .t.:-X--:,. .'.':.P,:<4s.:k.,-f—q),1* Fund, and ,,,...„-„ti'friA0, ,,,, ,r,--- ‘•;k.,• - - -. - - ,_.,..,k,.,,t,A-„7 ,-07•-‘ , le, 1 . ": itA 0; U,''.::' '' ' ,;40,;',.;4.t.,:Ail:%iVt i.: ltr UI PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT& PARK LAND DEDICATION PROJECTS FY 2004 August 23, 2004 Ca•ital Im•rovement Pro'ects Completion Capital Improvement Project Project Funding Date Final Projects Status Manager # Budget Source Expected/Actual Cost Lick Creek Park Development,Phase I Complete Pete PK0069 $538,000 98 G.Q./TPWD Grant 2/04 12/03 $507,093 George Bush Drive Landscape&Irrigation Design Complete Pete ST9804 $18,000 '98 G.O. 2/04 2/04 $16,000 Bee Creek Light Pole Replacement " Complete Pete PK0303 $118,000 '98 G.Q. 2/04 3/04 $87,565 Hensel Park Playground Replacement Complete David PK0210 $45,390 Replacement Account 5/04 5/04 $45,390 Trail Signs Installed Wolf Pen Creek Signs Sign Tower In Design Pete WP0460 $70,500 General Fund 3/04 Cemetery Rear Entrance Design and Construction Complete Pete N/A $55,000 General Fund 5/04 6/04 $43,234 Cemetery Land Acquisition Pending Contract Ross GG9905 $275,000 '98 G.O. Unknown Southeast Community Park Two-Acre Purchase Pending Contracts M.McAuliffe $40,000 12/04 Lincoln Center Expansion/Improvements Under Construction Ric PK0319 $984,000 CDBG Funds 3/05 Eastgate Improvements Under Construction David PK0404 $40,000 Brazos Beautiful 8/04 $44,270 $44,270 General Fund Landscaping Six City Sites Complete Pete N/A Hotel-Motel 5115/04 6/7/04 $16,385 Greens Prairie Rd Landscaping&Irrigation Design Pending Contract David ST0214 Street Project Fund Hereford Street Traffic Island Landscaping&Irrigation Design Complete David ST0305 $20,000 Streets CIP Fund 6/04 6/20/04 $29,000 Tarrow Island&City Hall Complete Pete N/A $10,000 Forestry Division 7/15/04 7/26104 $7,424 Business Park Sign Bids is August Pete GG0302 $50,000 Economic Development 12/04 Krenek Crossing Landscaping In Design Pete $20,000 City Centre 11/04 Central Park Soccer Field Light Design In Design Pete PK0406 $20,000 General Funds 9/04 Parkway Park In Design Pete '03 G.O. Field Redevelopment Southwood Sr.Lea ue Irri ation Desi n Biddin Parts Pete PK0300 $8,000 Fee 8/04 CIP Summary Complete 8 Under Construction 2 Bids Received 0 Pending Contracts 3 Out to Bid 2 In Design 4 Pending Land Acquisition 0 Other 0 On Hold 0 Total 19 Park Land Dedication Pro`ects Completion Park Land Dedication Project Project Funding Date Final Projects Prioritized Status Manager # Budget Source Ex•ected/Actual Cost ZONE 1 -$200,539 North.ate Park A •uisition On Hold Zone 1 Funds ZONE 2-$154,127 Thomas Park Track In Design David Zone 2 Funds ZONE 3-$50,523 Central Pond Sailfish Walk In Design David PK0405 $48,500 Zone 3 Funds ZONE 4-$21,988 Raintree Improvements Concrete Walks In Design Pete NA $0 Zone 4 Funds+ $15,000'98 Bond Windwood Im•rovements Concrete Walks In Designs Pete NA $Q Zone 4 Funds ZONE 5-$71,015 Brothers,Fitch Miller Benches 7 Complete David PK0311 $25,000 Zone 5 Funds 12/30/03 12/16/03 $23,922 Jack 8,Dorothy Miller Park Playgrounds wlCushion Complete David PK0312 $137,000 Zone 5 Funds 11/30/03 12/08/03 $88,889 Zone 5& Jack&Dorothy Miller Park Exercise Equipment Under Construction Pete PK0402 $20,000 Replacement 7/04 $23,224 Jack&Doroth Miller Park Trail Li•htin• In Design Pete Pk0408 $55,000 Zone 5 Funds 10/04 ZONE 6-$90,866 Southwest Park Development On Hold Pete/David $90,000 Zone 6 Funds Anderson Park Improvements On Hold David PK0314 $12,000 Zone 6 Funds Gabbard Park Sidewalk t On Hold David NA $0 Zone 6 Funds ZONE 7-$795,834 John Crompton Park Development t In Design Pete/David PK9803 $710,000 Zone 7 Funds Unknown ZONE 8-$40,885 ZONE 9-$33,721 ZONE 10-$135,268 Southern Oaks Park Development 1 Complete Pete PK0060 $185,000 Zone 10 Funds 5/20/04 6/4/04 $160,728 Desi.n Edelweiss Gartens On Hold Pete ZONE 11 -$66,054 Pebble Creek Park Improvements/Tot Playground I Under Contract Pete PK0403 $36,500 Zone 11 Funds $38,325 ZONE 12-$4,500 ZONE 13-$572 I-Intergenerational Project Park Land Dedication Summary Complete 3 Under Construction 1 Bids Received 1 PendinsContracts 0 Out to Bid 0 In Design 4 Pending Land Acquisition 0 On Hold 9 Total 18 O:/Projects/C/P/CIP&Park Land Ded Project List.doc Page 2 STRATEGIC PLANS IMPLEMENTATION CALENDAR JUNE - SEPTEMBER 2004 STATEMENT SUBJECT TEAM JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER Provide Effective Steve,Ross, Training on new cemetery software Have Master Plan developed by -Develop policies and procedures for Core services June 30th, 7/1/04(On Hold) operation by 9/1/04(On Hold) S 1.e Cemetery Services Ric, -,Neil Entrance Complete " ' - Completed maintenance standards Parks& Continue Steve, surveys for Southern Oaks Park&Lick -Third Quarter report to Parks Advisory -Develop preliminary cost estimates for -Achieve 80%or better rating on Leisure Implementation of Ric,Curtis Creek Park. Board John Crompton Park maintenance standards by end of Services Parks Maintenance os -Operation and maintenance of fiscal year S 1.a Standards Southern Oaks Park started _ -Complete Hazard Mngt.Policy& Parks& Implementation of Steve, Hazard Tree Inventory specs(On LeisureUrban Forest Ross, Hold.) Services -Complete design of new Forestry Management Plan S 1.b shop facility(Scheduled for FY06). Parks&. Steve Ric ;Complete construction'June 4tand . -Construct improvements at Eastgate Oesign lohn Gmmptori rieghborfpQd a Leisure Intergenerational bJm -ouem s Park Landscape Bradt Pete V., .per Services Parks David W. S 2.a -Update Joint Use Agreement with -Computer classes for Seniors -Complete implementation of automated Parks& Review Leisure Steve, os ISD(staff review complete) implemented at BVCOG training registration process for PARD Leisure scheduling and registration by 10/1/04 Service Prorams Peter C. rooms. Services ' -Bush Library"passport"program to S 2,b David G. begin. -Present"Golden Age Games" Parks& Cooperative Efforts Steve, concept to Parks&Recreation Leisure with the City of Peter Lt Advisory Board. Services Bryan David G. S2.c Parks& Development of Steve,PJC, - eeb Parks&Red'gatiort - Select a design firm to prepare Veterans Park Curter A� rd-Supgom�d construction documents for the Services' Phase It Ross, �� ; project. S 2.d Lr Peter{.: ` ,, . -. . �,_- f Parks a Development of a °wee,Ri% aReoenreft'decibel-from Couna7 1r61em Neigrfporlslod Park Leisure Five-year CIP Pian Pete V., ' m9 in9 1 °&'negtibortlood, or ipiete Services DavidW ,�la S2,e for Park Facilities #i ,. Parks& Regional Planning& Steve,Ric, ABV Lodging Asan.TMPA site tour Presentation to CityCouna'tJuIy8,,,-" Leisure Development Parks Board -',_`' 10,2004:-. 2004. Services Initiatives S4.a Planning& Update Park Land Steve, -Planning&Zoning Commission -City Council consideration of Development Dedication Rie consideration of recommendations and recommendations and guidelines S 1.d Ordinance guidelines NOTE: Shaded items have been completed. Revised August 4, 2004 Senior Services Coordinator Report July 2004 Summer Computer Classes Beginning computer classes for seniors are being offered at the Center for Regional Services through the Senior Services program on Mondays and Tuesdays July 12-August 3rd from 9:00-11:OOam each morning. We have a total of 13 students in both classes. The facility was offered to us by Tom Wilkinson with Brazos Valley Affordable Housing Corportation. Summer Classic Film Series at the George Bush Presidential Library Senior Services provided transportation to see the film The Lady Eve on Thursday, July 8th We had a full bus with 14 passengers. We will offer transportation to the film Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf on Tuesday, August 31st at 7:00pm. The film is free and popcorn and beverages are served prior to the film in the lobby. Computer Club The Computer Club met on Wednesday, July 14 and will meet on July 28th at 9:00am- 10:30am. The speaker on the 14th was Robert Jensen who spoke on Excel and on the 28th we have David Roye speaking on designing a web page. We began asking participants to complete an evalutation on each speaker so that we may receive valuable feedback to help in the planning of future speakers. We average 30 participants at the summer meetings. Third Friday Bridge The group met on Friday, July 16 and 20 players were there from 9:30am-12:00noon. We are growing and will include one more table which will be the most the room can hold. Fall Classes The classes for the fall for seniors include: Tai Chi, Computer, Beginning Bridge, Rug Hooking, Genealogy, Field Archaeology along with special events. We will offer dances, lunch/lecture series and a new program with the International Center called Senior World Passport Program. The World Passport Program will consist of six sessions covering a different part of the world and will take place at the Teen Center Participation Reports: April, May and June 2004 - Total No. of Senior Citizen Programs offered. 25 - Total No. of Senior Special Events offered. 6 - Total No. of Senior Advisory Committee Meetings 3 - Total No. of Senior Participants Served 1715 - Annual Promotions in Senior Marketing Materials 1 - Monthly promotions in the Golden Eagle 3