Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/07/2017 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionPlanning and Zoning Commission Workshop College Station, TX Meeting Agenda - Final City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting. City Hall Council Chambers6:00 PMThursday, December 7, 2017 1. Call the meeting to order. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff. *Final Plat ~ Minor Plat ~ Emerald Park Plaza Block 1, Lots 4R-A & 4R-B ~ Case #FP2017-000012 *Final Plat ~ Minor Plat ~ Century Hill Block 1, Lots 1R - 11R & Common Area 1 ~ Case #FPCO2017-000014 *Final Plat ~ Minor Plat ~ Drozd Subdivision Lot 1 ~ Case #FPCO2017-000013 17-06594. Sponsors:Thomas and Hovde Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the consideration of the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work. 17-07405. Sponsors:Golbabai 2017 Plan of WorkAttachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a semi-annual update on Pre-Application Conference Surveys. 17-07326. Sponsors:Golbabai Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a quarterly update on economic development efforts. 17-07317. Sponsors:Ruiz Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: *Thursday, December 14, 2017 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 4:00 p.m. and Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison - Burns) *Thursday, December 21, 2017 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 17-07148. Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 12/1/2017 December 7, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Agenda - Final Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: *A Comprehensive Plan Amendment amending the Thoroughfare Plan and the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on November 16, 2017, and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on November 20, 2017, and voted (7-0) to approve the request. *An Ordinance Amendment amending Section 1.6, "Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan". The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on November 16, 2017, and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on November 20, 2017, and voted (7-0) to approve the request. 17-07019. 10. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board. 11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 12. Adjourn. The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on December 1, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. _____________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 12/1/2017 December 7, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Agenda - Final Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 12/1/2017 Page 1 of 6 2017 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work Comprehensive Plan Items Implementation of Adopted Plans Summary: Implementation of adopted master plans and neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely: Central College Station, Eastgate, Southside Area, Wellborn Community, and South Knoll Area neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian & Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste Water, Medical District, and Economic Development master plans. Project Dates: 12/21/2017: Presentation of UDO & Comp Plan Annual Review (JP & LH) Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion: On-Going Thoroughfare Plan Update Summary: Project Dates: The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is in the process of updating its Concept Map for the BCS region. Once adopted by the MPO, the city is anticipating taking action to amend the Thoroughfare Plan to align with the changes in the MPO’s regional Concept Map. 06/15/17: Provide an update on the BCS Thoroughfare Concept Map as adopted by the MPO and provide information on the City’s next steps to amend the current Thoroughfare Master Plan. Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (JS) 11/16/17: Presentation of ordinance amendment aligning the City’s Thoroughfare Plan with the adopted MPO Plan. 11/16/17: Workshop presentation on thoroughfare classifications. 11/20/17: City Council adopts ordinance amendment aligning the City’s Thoroughfare Plan with the adopted MPO Plan. Staff Assigned: Jason Schubert Completed: November 20, 2017 Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan Update Summary: Bring additional updates to the Planning and Zoning Commission as the Master Plan update moves forward. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Venessa Garza Anticipated Completion: Winter 2018 Page 2 of 6 Neighborhood Integrity Items *Traffic Calming Toolkit Summary: Receive information regarding the current traffic calming policy and devices (speed pillows, etc.), and including updates as recommended by the Council Transportation and Mobility Committee. Additionally receive update on the implementation of the neighborhood parking toolbox created by the Neighborhood Transportation Task Force. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Troy Rother & Jason Schubert Anticipated Completion: January 2018 Student Housing in Established Single-Family Neighborhoods Summary: Research best practices from peer university communities regarding the management of student housing in single-family neighborhoods. Explore the possibility of expanding options for Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO), mitigate the impacts to on-street parking and drainage and provide educational opportunities for Homeowner’s Associations and Neighborhood Associations Project Dates: 4/20/17: Follow up discussion regarding the presentation on student housing in established single-family neighborhoods. 8/17/17: Presentation on Neighborhood Services (Barbara Moore) 10/19/17: P&Z presentation on student housing in established single-family neighborhoods. 11/9/17: City Council presentation on student housing in established single-family neighborhoods. Staff Assigned: Jenifer Paz, Rachel Lazo & Jade Broadnax Completed: November 9, 2017 UDO Regulatory Items Update on Off-Street Parking Requirements Summary: Provide options to allow flexibility to off- street parking requirements. Receive direction on future UDO text amendments. Project Dates: 5/4/17: Additional presentation and discussion on potential amendments or additions to the City’s current off-street parking requirements. 8/3/2017: Presentation of Draft UDO Amendments to 12-7.3 Off-Street Parking Requirements. 8/24/2017: UDO Amendments to 12-7.3 Off- Street Parking Requirements adopted by City Council. Page 3 of 6 Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Completed: August 24, 2017 Evaluation of UDO Regulations Summary: Project Dates: Review UDO requirements that add minimal value as identified by staff and consider opportunities to reduce regulations and streamline processes. 06/01/17 Presentation of staff's initial list of identified opportunities to reduce regulations and streamline processes. 06/15/2017: Comprehensive Plans and Rezoning staff reports revised to new coversheet format. 7/6/2017: Presentation of Draft UDO Amendments to eliminate certain screening requirements and eliminate the visual treatment for exposed concrete. 7/27/17: City Council adopts ordinance amendment to eliminate certain screening requirements and eliminate the visual treatment for exposed concrete. 8/3/2017: Presentation of Draft UDO Amendment on Off-Street Parking Requirements which includes the elimination of large parking lot concepts and allowing laydown curbs adjacent to buildings. Also, Preliminary Plan and Final Plat staff reports revised to new abbreviated format. 8/24/2017: The elimination of large parking lot concepts, allowing laydown curbs adjacent to buildings, and adopted by City Council as part of revisions to the parking ordinances. 8/30/17: Public meeting held for feedback on staff proposals regarding Preliminary Plans and Non- Conformities. 9/11/17: City Council adopted ordinance amendment increasing discretion granted to staff regarding requirements for easements. Provides flexibility to the requirement for 20-foot PUEs at the rear of all lots. 9/21/17: Presentation on staff’s initial ideas and public feedback for UDO amendments for changes to the preliminary plan process and requirements for non-conforming properties. 11/16/17: P&Z Presentation of ordinance amendments for preliminary plans and non- conformities. 12/21/17: Anticipated P&Z presentation to amend non-conformities recommendation. 12/21/17: Anticipated ordinance amendment presentation to streamline NRA requirements. Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Initiation: June 1, 2017 Page 4 of 6 Sign Ordinance Revisions Summary: Review and update the City’s sign ordinance in light of the recent Supreme Court decision regarding sign regulations based upon content. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Molly Hitchcock, Rachel Lazo & Legal Anticipated Completion: Winter 2018 Suburban Commercial Land Use and Zoning Summary: Under City Council direction, review current Comprehensive Plan land use description and zoning ordinance requirements of the Suburban Commercial zoning district and provide options for future text amendments. Project Dates: 8/30/17: Public meeting held for feedback on staff proposals regarding options for the Suburban Commercial zoning district. 10/5/17: P&Z presentation on staff’s initial ideas and public feedback for changes to the Suburban Commercial zoning district. 11/9/17: City Council presentation on staff’s initial ideas and public feedback for changes to the Suburban Commercial zoning district. Staff Assigned: Madison Thomas, Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton Completed: November 9, 2017 Bicycle Rack Standards Summary: Under City Council direction, review current non- residential parking requirements for providing on- site bicycle parking facilities. Project Dates: 9/5/17: Presentation to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board on current bicycle parking requirements and staff’s recommended revisions. 9/7/17: Presentation to Planning and Zoning Commission on current bicycle parking requirements and staff’s recommended revisions. 11/16/17: Follow-up presentation on bicycle parking requirements. 11/20/17: City Council presentation on bicycle parking requirements. Staff Assigned: Alaina Helton & Madison Thomas Completed: November 2017 Non-Residential Landscaping Requirements Summary: Review current city landscaping requirements (including streetscaping and buffer standards) and the water usage needed to maintain current landscaping requirements. Explore options for water-conserving landscaping. Project Dates: 8/30/17: Public meeting held for feedback on staff proposals regarding options for the Suburban Commercial zoning district. Page 5 of 6 9/21/17: Presentation on staff’s initial ideas and the public feedback on those ideas regarding non-residential landscaping requirements. Staff Assigned: Rachel Lazo, Madison Thomas, Jade Broadnax Anticipated Completion: December 2017 On-Going Items Economic Development Updates Summary: Receive regular updates from the Economic Development Department regarding the vision and implementation of the commercialization of TAMU research- related output, including examples of successful efforts elsewhere. Additionally, receive an update on the recent announcement regarding plans for the TAMU System Rellis Campus revitalization effort. Project Dates: 06/15/17: Presentation of a quarterly update on Economic Development efforts and land availability for commercial uses. Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (NR) 12/7/17: Planned presentation of a quarterly update on Economic Development efforts and land availability for commercial uses. Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (NR) Staff Assigned: Economic Development Anticipated Completion: On-Going Semi-Annual Review of Pre-Application Conference Surveys Summary: Provide an update on the survey results from the Pre-Application Conference process. Project Dates: 3/16/17: Provided an update on the status of the PAC meeting process and implementation of the PAC survey. Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (MB) 12/7/17: P&Z Workshop presentation to provide an update on the status of the PAC meeting process and implementation of the PAC survey. (JG) Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Completion: On-Going Educational/Informational Items Parkland Dedication Summary: Review of parkland dedication requirements and available resources. Project Dates: 7/6/17: Staff presented information regarding parkland dedication requirements and summary or parks and greenways master plan. Staff Assigned: Jenifer Paz Completed: July 6, 2017 Sidewalk Fee-in-Lieu Summary: Review of sidewalk fund requirements and available resources. Project Dates: 9/21/17: Staff presenting information regarding sidewalk fund requirements and available resources. Page 6 of 6 Staff Assigned: Lauren Hovde & Rachel Lazo Completed: September 21, 2017 Block Length and Block Perimeter Summary: Review of current requirements regarding block length and block perimeter. Project Dates: 8/3/2017: Presentation of a review of current requirements regarding block length and block perimeter. Follow-up presentation requested for staff proposed amendments to this section. Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai & Jason Schubert Completed: August 3, 2017 Public Hearing Notifications Summary: Review current community notification requirements and practices for cases involving a public hearing. Project Dates: 12/21/17: Anticipated staff presentation regarding current community notification requirements and practices for cases involving a public hearing. Staff Assigned: Lance Simms Anticipated Completion: December 21, 2017 Mueller Report Update Summary: Update on the implementation of the 2013 Organizational Review of P&DS (AKA “Mueller Report”) Project Dates: 07/20/17: Presentation of an update on the implementation of the Mueller Report. Staff Assigned: Lance Simms Completed: July 20, 2017 Review of Development Fees Summary: Evaluation of the effect of development fees on the price of single family housing to the homeowner and an overview of the financial context of development fees for the City. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai & Alaina Helton Anticipated Completion: Spring 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular College Station, TX Meeting Agenda - Final City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting. City Hall Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, December 7, 2017 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 4. Consent Agenda Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from Meetings. *Casey Oldham ~ December 7, 2017 *Bill Mather ~ December 7, 2017 17-07024.1 Casey Oldham Bill Mather Attachments: Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes. *November 16, 2017 ~ Workshop *November 16, 2017 ~ Regular 17-07134.2 Sponsors:Hejny Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 12/1/2017 December 7, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final November 16 2017 Workshop November 16 2017 Regular Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Southern Pointe Subdivision consisting of 1,994 single-family lots, two commercial lots, one urban lot, a school, proposed fire station site, and parkland lots on approximately 553 acres located at 17529 State Highway 6 South, generally located north of Peach Creek Cut-Off Road and west of Pipeline Road in the City's Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction, more generally known as Texas World Speedway. Case #PP2017-000011 17-07224.3 Sponsors:Paz Application Staff Report - Southern pointe SAM & Aerial Phasing Exhibit Preliminary Plan Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Aggieland Business Park consisting of 24 lots on approximately 50 acres generally located west of the intersection of Dynasty Drive and FM 60 Raymond Stotzer Parkway, in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case #PP2017-000023 17-07034.4 Sponsors:Thomas Staff Report Vicinity Map & Aerial Application Preliminary Plan Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Development Plat for The Dairy Barn Subdivision consisting of one residential lot on approximately 1 acre located at 17801 FM 2154 in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case # DVPL2017-000006 17-07074.5 Sponsors:Broadnax Staff Report Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map Application Plat Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for JHW Commercial Addition consisting of two commercial lots on approximately two acres located at 100 Graham Road. Case # 17-07084.6 Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 12/1/2017 December 7, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final PP2017-000019 Sponsors:Broadnax Staff Report Vicinity Map, Aerial Map, and Small Area Map Application Preliminary Plan Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Phase 33 consisting of 11 estate lots on 20.54 acres located on the south side of Anasazi Bluff Drive in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case #FP2017-000026 17-07094.7 Sponsors:Helton Staff Report Vicinty, Aerial & SAM Application Final Plat Attachments: Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to GC General Commercial and NAP Natural Areas Protected on approximately 2.259 acres of land located at 4075 State Highway 6 South. Case # REZ2017-000029 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the January 11, 2018 City Council meeting - subject to change). 17-07256. Sponsors:Lazo Staff Report Background Information Vicinity Aerial & SAM Application Rezoning Map Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “ Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, 17-07047. Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 12/1/2017 December 7, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final by changing the zoning district boundaries from R-4 Multi-Family to GC General Commercial for approximately 5 acres located at 3635 Kenyon Drive generally located between Paloma Ridge Drive and Kenyon Drive along Holleman Drive South. Case # REZ2017-000030 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the January 11, 2018 City Council meeting - subject to change). Sponsors:Thomas Staff Report University Heights Background Info Vicinity, Aerial & SAM Application Rezoning Map Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from O Office to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 1.47 acres being a portion of Lot 1R, Block 3, Spring Creek Gardens Subdivision Phase 3, and being generally located at 4320 Decatur Drive. Case #REZ2017-000025 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the January 11, 2018 City Council meeting- subject to change.) 17-07108. Sponsors:Helton Staff Report Background Information Vicinity, Aerial & SAM Application Zoning Map PDD Concept Plan Bulk Variance List Attachments: 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 10. Adjourn The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. Page 4 College Station, TX Printed on 12/1/2017 December 7, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on December 1, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. _____________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 5 College Station, TX Printed on 12/1/2017 Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name William R. Mather Request Submitted on 11/27/2017 I will not be in attendance at the meeting on 12/7/2017 for the reason specified: (Date) Out of Town Signature November 16, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Workshop Meeting November 16, 2017 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Elianor Vessali, Keith Williamson, Casey Oldham, Johnny Burns, Bill Mather and Jeremy Osborne COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jane Kee CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerome Rektorik CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, Justin Golbabai, Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton, Madison Thomas, Rachel Lazo, Jade Broadnax, Jason Schubert, Erika Bridges, Kevin Ferrer, Tim Horn, Anthony Armstrong, Venessa Garza, Carla Robinson, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call the meeting to order. Acting Chairperson Vessali called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. There was no discussion. 3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. Commissioner Mather arrived at 6:07 p.m. 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the consideration of the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work. Planning Administrator Golbabai presented updates on the 2017 Plan of Work to the Commission. 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding bicycle parking standards. Senior Planner Helton presented updates on bicycle parking standards to the Commission including assessments on existing bike racks and bicycle parking alternatives, Commissioner Mather asked for the number of bikes a “facility” can hold. Senior Planner Helton responded that each new development now requires two u-shaped bike racks, racks that held four or more bikes are considered a “bike facility”. November 16, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 Commissioner Mather asked if the City provided bike racks when constructing new bike paths. Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Senior Program Manager Garza there isn’t anything in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) that gives a specific breakdown, but depending on the type of the facility there are bike racks installed incrementally. There was a general consensus amongst the Commission to recommend a Market Driven Bike Parking approach and eliminating the minimum bike rack parking requirements. 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an overview of thoroughfare classifications and their related street cross sections. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert presented an overview of the thoroughfare classifications to the Commission. Commissioner Oldham asked about the MPO 2050 Thoroughfare Concept, and asked about the thought process, planning and engineering, and determining the size of roadways. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that a basis of practice has evolved since the invention of the vehicle. The City also looks at the Comprehensive Plan, future developments, and adjustments are based upon that and growth, existing roadways, and travel demand model. 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: *Monday, November 20, 2017 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 5:00 p.m. and Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison – Williamson) *Thursday, December 7, 2017 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: *A Rezoning for approximately .35 acres located at 1600 Texas Avenue South from GC General Commercial & SC Suburban Commercial to GC General Commercial and NAP Natural Areas Preserved. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on October 5, 2017, and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on October 26, 2017, and voted (7-0) to approve the request. *A Compressive Plan Amendment for approximately seven acres located at 801 Lincoln Avenue amending the Eastgate Neighborhood Plan. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on October 19, 2017, and the motion to recommend approval failed (1-3). The City Council heard this item on November 9, 2017, and voted (4-2) to approve the request. *A Rezoning for approximately seven acres located at 801 Lincoln Avenue from GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development District. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on October 19, 2017, and voted (4-0) to recommend approval, with conditions. The City Council heard this item on November 9, 2017, and voted (6-0) to approve the request. 9. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Bio Corridor Board. November 16, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 There was no discussion. 10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion. 11. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Elianor Vessali, Acting Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin. Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services November 16, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 7 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting November 16, 2017, 7:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Elianor Vessali, Keith Williamson, Casey Oldham, Johnny Burns, Bill Mather and Jeremy Osborne COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jane Kee CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerome Rektorik CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, Justin Golbabai, Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton, Rachel Lazo, Jade Broadnax, Jason Schubert, Erika Bridges, Kevin Ferrer, Tim Horn, Anthony Armstrong, Venessa Garza, Carla Robinson, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order Acting Chairperson Vessali called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Hear Citizens Anna Scott was available to present the Commission and Staff with information regarding the plat for the Ranch at Arrington. 4. Consent Agenda 4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from meetings. *Jane Kee ~ November 16, 2017 4.2 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes. *October 19, 2017 Workshop *October 19, 2016 Regular 4.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Development Plat for Equity Real Estate Subdivision consisting of one commercial lot on approximately two acres, generally located at the northeast intersection of Wellborn Road and Navarro Drive. Case #DVPL2017-000007 4.4 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Brewster Pointe consisting of 114 lots on approximately 34.5 acres generally located at 3451 Barron Cut-Off Road. Case #PP2017-000020 4.5 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Summit Crossing Phase 3A consisting of 2.209 acres right-of-way dedication, and 0.227 acres of Parkland Dedication on November 16, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 7 approximately 2.5 acres generally located north of Harvey Road and west of FM 158. Case #FP2016-000042 4.6 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Summit Crossing Phase 3B consisting of 60 single-family lots, 1.715 acres of right-of-way dedication and, 0.026 acres Parkland Dedication on approximately 7.3 acres generally located north of Harvey Road and west of FM 158. Case #FP2016-000043 4.7 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Reese Cove Subdivisions consisting of seven residential lots on approximately 13 acres located at 11071 Favor Road, generally located at the north intersection of N. Dowling Road and Favor Road. Case #PP2017-000017 4.8 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for University Heights Subdivision Phase 4 consisting of 18 multi-family lots on approximately nine acres, generally located at the southwest intersection of Holleman Drive South and Kenyon Drive. Case #FP2016- 000028 4.9 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 consisting of 100 townhouse lots and seven common areas on approximately 14.6 acres located at 4050 Holleman Drive South. Case #FP2017-000004 Acting Chairperson Vessali temporarily turned the meeting over to Commissioner Osborne to handle the consent agenda. Commissioner Osborne motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1-4.4 & 4.7-4.9. Commissioner Burns seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. Commissioner Osborne motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.5 & 4.6. Commissioner Mather seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0-1) with Commissioner Vessali abstaining from the vote. 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Tarrow Townhomes consisting of 11 residential lots on approximately 1.67 acres and one discretionary item for payment into the Sidewalk Fund located at 200 Tarrow Street, generally located west of the intersection of Tarrow Street and Autumn Circle, north of Chimney Hill Subdivision, and immediately south of the City limit line. Case #FP2017-000014 Staff Planner Lazo presented the Final Plat and discretionary item to the Commission and recommended approval. November 16, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 7 Commissioner Oldham motioned to recommend approval of the discretionary item and Final Plat citing unique topographical conditions of the development. Commissioner Osborne seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Development Plat for The Ranch at Arrington consisting of one multi-family lot and 0.35 acres of right-of-way dedication on approximately 12 acres located at 1650 Arrington Road, generally located south of the intersection of South Oaks Drive and Arrington Road. Case #DVPL2017-000002 This item was removed from the agenda at the applicant’s request. 8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan – Future Land Use & Character Map from Business Park to Urban for approximately 11 acres generally located at 8822 Burgess Lane and near the east intersection of State Highway 47 and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. Case #CPA2017-000015 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the December 14, 2017 City Council Meeting – subject to change) Principal Planner Paz presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Commission and recommended denial. Commissioner Oldham asked about recent development activity within the Inter-local Agreement (ILA) area. Principal Planner Paz stated that on the City of College Station side, there have been developments such as ViaSat, Fujifilm, and Camwest. Commissioner Oldham asked for the approximate size of the ViaSat and Fujifilm buildings. Principal Planner Paz stated that the buildings are approximately 89,000 square feet and 50,000 square feet, respectively. Commissioner Osborne asked for the acreage of the BioCorridor area. Assistant Director of Planning & Development Services Hitchcock stated that the BioCorridor Planned Development District consists of about 200 acres. Applicant Jim Jett, was available to speak on the project. Joe Schultz, Schultz Engineering, was available to answer questions from the Commission and provide support for the item. Acting Chairperson Vessali asked for clarification on the land use amendment request for this item. Principal Planner Paz stated that this land use change speaks more to creating a Multi-Family development. Commissioner Osborne asked if any recommendations have been made for this area since the Rellis Campus announcement. November 16, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 7 Assistant Director of Planning & Development Services Hitchcock stated that no further discussions have occurred. Acting Chairperson Vessali opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Acting Chairperson Vessali closed the public hearing. Commissioner Oldham motioned to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Osborne seconded the motion. There was general discussion The motion passed (6-0). 9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District and R Rural to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 11 acres at 8822 Burgess Lane and near the east intersection of State Highway 47 and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. Case #REZ2017-000024 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the December 14, 2017 City Council meeting- subject to change) Principal Planner Paz presented the Rezoning to the Commission and recommended denial. Commissioner Oldham asked for the current use of the site. Principal Planner Paz stated that this property is currently vacant property, with some storage, a single-family home site, and manufactured home sites. Applicant, Jim Jett, spoke on the current use of the property. Acting Chairperson Vessali asked how the adjacent airport height restrictions would impact development. Graduate Engineer I Armstrong stated that the flight path would limit development to a maximum elevation of 400-feet, and given existing contour elevations, the building height would be limited to approximately 70-feet. Acting Chairperson Vessali opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Acting Chairperson Vessali closed the public hearing. Commissioner Osborne motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning. Commissioner Oldham seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). November 16, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 7 10. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 2.2 acres being a portion of Block 1, Lot 1, Jackson Estates, Phase One, and being generally located at 3747 Rock Prairie Road. Case #REZ2017-000026 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the December 14, 2017 City Council meeting- subject to change) Senior Planner Helton presented the Rezoning to the Commission and recommended approval. Applicant, Rabon Metcalf, RME Engineers, was available to answer questions from the Commission. Acting Chairperson Vessali opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Acting Chairperson Vessali closed the public hearing. Commissioner Osborne motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning. Commissioner Williamson seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 11. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 2.2, “Planning & Zoning Commission,” Section 2.8 “Administrator”, Section 2.12 “Summary of Review Authority”, Section 3.2 “General Approval Procedures”, and Section 3.4 “Plat Review” related to the review authority and processing of preliminary plans. Case #ORDA2017-000012 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the December 14, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change) Director of Planning & Development Services Simms presented the Ordinance Amendment to the Commission and recommended approval. Acting Chairperson Vessali opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Acting Chairperson Vessali closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mather motioned to recommend approval of the Ordinance Amendment. Commissioner Oldham seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 12. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Section 9.2 “Nonconforming Uses”, Section 9.3 “Nonconforming Structures”, and Section 7.10.C.4 “Building Materials” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas to permit increased flexibility for non-conforming uses and structures. Case #ORDA2017-000013 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the December 14, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change) November 16, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 7 Planning Administrator Golbabai presented the Ordinance Amendment to the Commission and recommended approval. Acting Chairperson Vessali opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Acting Chairperson Vessali closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mather motioned to recommend approval of the Ordinance Amendment. Commissioner Osborne seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 13. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the College Station Comprehensive Plan by amending the Thoroughfare Plan and the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan to incorporate revisions related to the Bryan/College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization 2050 Thoroughfare Concept and other City-initiated changes and clean up items. Case #CPA2017-000019 (Note: Final Action of this item will be considered at the November 20, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change.) Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment amending the Thoroughfare Plan to the Commission and recommended approval. There was general discussion. Acting Chairperson Vessali opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Acting Chairperson Vessali closed the public hearing. Commissioner Osborne motioned to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Burns seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 14. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 1.6, “Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas to recognize locational flexibility to ensure consistency among various City master plan components and clarify that plan depictions may be updated as development occurs. Case #ORDA2017-000015 (Note: Final Action of this item will be considered at the November 20, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change.) Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert presented the Ordinance Amendment to the Commission and recommended approval. Acting Chairperson Vessali opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Acting Chairperson Vessali closed the public hearing. November 16, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 7 Commissioner Williamson motioned to recommend approval of the Ordinance Amendment. Commissioner Burns seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 15. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion. 16. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Elianor Vessali, Acting Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services Name of Project:SOUTHERN POINTE AMENDMENT Address:N/A Legal Description:A021000, S D SMITH (OCL), TRACT 25, 261.575 ACRES Applicant:: Property Owner:SOUTHERN POINTE LLC Jones|Carter (Derek Walton, P.E.) Total Acreage:552 Requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): N/A Regarding the waiver request, explain how: There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. N/A Total No. of Lots:1999 ROW Acreage:23 Existing Use: Floodplain Acreage:N/A Special Flood Hazard Area? N/A PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 COMMERCIAL The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantional property right of the applicant. N/A The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, orinjurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. N/A Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): N/A Requested Oversize Participation: Detailed explanation of condition identified above: N/A Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat, if applicable: No. of acres to be dedicated: No. of acres in detention: N/ANo. of acres in floodplain: N/A N/A No. of acres in greenways:N/A Parkland Development Fee:N/A Parks & Recreation Advisory Board approval date: N/A Page 2 of 2 Planning & Zoning Commission December 7, 2017 Scale 1,994 single-family lots, two commercial lots, one urban lot, a school and fire station site and parkland on approximately 553 acres. Location 17529 SH-6 S, generally located north Peach Creek Cut-Off Road and west of Pipeline Road in the City’s Extra- Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), more generally known as Texas World Speedway Applicant Jones & Carter Project Manager Jenifer Paz, AICP Principal Planner jpaz@cstx.gov Project Overview This plan is for the redevelopment of the Texas World Speedway property, the first Municipal Utility District in Brazos County, for a master planned community. It is also a revision of the original Preliminary Plan approved in January. The revision is specifically to revise the phasing of the subdivision. The previously approved waivers for UDO Section 8.3.E.3.a ‘Street Projections’; Section 8.3.G.2.a ‘Block Length’; Section 8.3.G.2.b ‘Block Length’; Section 8.3.G.2.c ‘Block Length’; Section 8.3.G.4.b ‘Block Perimeter’; Section 8.3.J.2 ‘Access Ways’; and Section 8.3.W ‘Single-Family Residential Parking Requirements for Platting’ will carry with this plan given that changes do not affect the previously approved waivers. Parkland Dedication At the November 8, 2016 Parks & Recreation Advisory Board meeting, the Board recommended approval for the dedication of 31.98 acres of neighborhood parkland and 18.62 acres of community park land. This parkland will be deeded to the City at the time of annexation. Additionally, the Board has approved the use of park development fees to be used for development of trails throughout the subdivision and the development of parkland that is proposed to be dedicated. The Planning & Zoning Commission approved the dedication of the parkland with the approval of the previous Preliminary Plan at their January 5, 2017 meeting. Traffic Impact Analysis Not required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes with the exception of previously approved waivers mentioned in the overview. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan. Preliminary Plan for Southern Pointe PP2017-000011 Planning & Zoning Commission December 7, 2017 Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity Map, SAM & Aerial 2. Application 3. Phasing Exhibit 4. Copy of Preliminary Plan MAJOR COLLECTORKATIE LOOPSOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAYCOLBERT LANEPETAL LANESHUBATA DRIVECAMDEN LANEAMORY DRIVECHATOM DRIVECONOLE COURTKINNEY DRIVE CHATOM DRIVECHATOM DRIV E MATHER PARKWAY BRAXTON DRIVEWEDDINGTON ROADGUNN RIDGE DRIVECROSBY DRIVERISI DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVE SEABRING DRIVE BALDWYN DRIVE LAUREL RIDGE LANE MARIETTA DRIVE GUNN RIDGE DRIVE ROXIE LANE MARIETTA DRIVEQUINLAN DRIVESAMANTHA LANEROCKFORD DRIVE DAYTONA DRIVE SOUTHERN CROSS DRIVE TALLADEGA DRIVE WILKESBORO DRIVE POCONO DRIVE ELDORA DRIVE ELDORA DRIVE ELDORA DRIVEPATRIOT DRIVEDARLINGTON AVENUESPARTAN DRIVECANTON DRIVEVERONA DRIVEPATRIOT DRIVEKENNESAW DRIVEDARLINGTON AVENUEPATRIOT DRIVEKENNESAW DRIVENATCHEZ DRIVEGREENVILLE DRIVERALEIG H D R I V E TIRADO D R I V E RAL E I G H D R I V ERALEIGH LOOPRAL E I G H C O U R T PRO M E N A D E D R I V EDURANT DRIVEFULT O N D R I V E ELD O R A D R I V E DAYTONA DRI V E ROCKFORD D R I V E SOUTHERN C R O S S D R I V E TALLADEGA DRIVE ELDORA DRIVE SOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY MA T H E R P A R K W A Y KINNEY LOOPPOND A2POND A1POND FPOND EPOND B1POND B2POND CMI N O R C O L L E C T O R POND DTexas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439150 Venture Dr., Suite 100 • College Station, Texas 77845 • 979.731.8000SOUTHERN POINTEOVERALL PHASING EXHIBITBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASOCTOBER 13, 2017SECTION 1 (103 LOTS):1. STREET ACCESS: MATHER PARKWAY (1) & ELDORADRIVE (2)2. GRAVITY SEWER TO LIFT STATION.3. STORM SEWER TO POND D4. WATER SUPPLY 12" FROM 8" ON NORTHWESTCORNER OF PROPERTY.5. NO TRACK DEMO.SECTION 1 MAJORTHOROUGH FARESSECTION BOUNDARYCoCS UDO Adequate Street Access.1. One (1) external street connection is required for a street serving asroadway access for thirty (30) or fewer lots.2. When there are more than thirty (30) lots to be served by external streetconnections, a minimum of two (2) street connections to external pavedpublic streets shall be required. The Commission may allow a RemoteEmergency Access where development phasing or constraints of the landprevent the provision of a second street connection. Notwithstandingthe foregoing, two (2) street connections to external paved public streetsshall be required when one hundred (100) or more lots are served.3. Three (3) street connections to external paved public streets may berequired by the Commission when two hundred (200) or more lots areserved.4. Where more than one (1) external street connection is required, at leastone (1) external street connection shall not be located over a potentialhazard such as a high-pressure gas line or a creek where the onehundred-year floodplain overtops the street, regardless of itsclassification.Phasing Alternatives:1. Section 1B can be constructed any time after Section 1A.2. Sections 6 & 7 can be constructed any time after Section 2.3. Sections 3B & 3C can be constructed any time after Section 3A.4. Sections 9A & 9B can be combined to form Section 9.5. Section 10B & 10C can be constructed any time after Section 10A.6. Sections 9A and 10A can be constructed any time after Section 3A as longas they are combined and the temporary access road from SH 6 FrontageRd to Chatom Drive is constructed with this phase.7. Section 11 can be constructed any time after Section 8.8. Sections 9B, 12 & 14 can be constructed any time after Section 3A as longas Detention Pond F, the north end of Mather Parkway, and the sanitarythat runs through Section 11, 16 & 20 are constructed beforehand.9. Section 16 can be constructed any time after Section 11.10. Sections 18, 19 & 20 can be constructed in any order as long as thedetention pond for this drainage area is constructed with the firstsection.11. School Site can be constructed any time after Section 5. School Site canbe constructed after Section 3A as long as the adjacent roads androundabout are constructed before the School Site is constructed.SECTION100SECTION101SECTION400SECTION401SECTION300SECTION201SECTION200SECTION701SECTION700SECTION202SECTION1000SECTION900SECTION500SECTION600SECTION802SECTION801SECTION800SECTION601SECTION503SECTION501SECTION502SECTION1100SECTION504SECTION602SECTION803LOT COUNTSECTION 100 - 150SECTION 101 - 57SECTION 200 - 156SECTION 300 - 136SECTION 201 - 98SECTION 202 - 112SECTION 400 - 84SECTION 401 - 56SECTION 500 - 104SECTION 501 - 100SECTION 502 - 35SECTION 503 - 54SECTION 504 - 88SECTION 600 - 85SECTION 601 - 102SECTION 602 - 51SECTION 700 - 89SECTION 800 - 51SECTION 701 - 117SECTION 801 - 99SECTION 802 - 110SECTION 803 - 62TOTAL - 1,996Phasing Altern1. Section 600 can be platted after Section 500.2. Sections 601 & 602 can be platted after Section 503 & 504.3. The 800 sections can only be platted after Section 600.Phasing Notes: FU T U R E M A J O R C O L L E C T O R R O W ( 8 0 ' ) COMMON AREA 8D(8.32 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 4G(4.32 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 2E(2.65 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 2D(2.49 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 9E(8.70 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 2F(2.57 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 2G(2.90 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 7C(5.32 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 2A30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 2H15' PAE COMMON AREA 2J30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 6A15' PAE COMMON AREA 6B15' PAE COMMON AREA 7B15' PAE COMMON AREA 7A15' PAE COMMON AREA 11A15' PAE COMMON AREA 5B15' PAE COMMON AREA 5A15' PAE COMMON AREA 4H15' PAE COMMON AREA 8F15' PAE COMMON AREA 3A15' PAE COMMON AREA 8A15' PAE COMMON AREA 8EVARIABLE WIDTH PAE COMMON AREA 2C15' PAE COMMON AREA 6C30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 3BVARIABLE WIDTH PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 8BVARIABLE WIDTH PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 9D30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 9C30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 9B30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 9A30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 4F30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 4E30' PUE/PAECOMMON AREA 2B30' PUE/PAE PARKLAND ANEIGHBORHOOD PARK8.71 ACRES PARKLAND BCOMMUNITY PARK18.62 ACRES PARKLAND DNEIGHBORHOOD PARK8.58 ACRES PA R K L A N D F NE I G H B O R H O O D P A R K 10. 5 6 A C R E S PA R K L A N D J NE I G H B O R H O O D P A R K 1.4 1 A C R E S PARKLAND ENEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1.65 ACRES COMMON AREA 4A15' PAECOMMON AREA 8G15' PAE COMMON AREA 4B15' PAE COMMON AREA 4D15' PAE COMMON AREA 4C15' PAE COMMON AREA 8H30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 8C30' PUE/PAE PARKLAND CNEIGHBORHOODPARK1.07 ACRES CONOLE C O U R T CRO S B Y D R I V E SOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY DARLINGTON AVENUEKATIE LOOP WEDDINGTON ROAD GUNN RIDGE DRIVEQUI N L A N D R I V E PAT R I O T D R I V E RALEIGH DRIVER A L E I G H L O O P G A I N E S V I L L E D R I V E NE V E U D R I V E SPARTAN DRIVE CANT O N D R I V E SHUBATA DRIVE CAMDEN LANE AMORY DRIVE CHATO M D R I V ECHATOM DRIVEKINNEY DRIVEMATHER PARKWAYKEN N E S A W D R I V E NAT C H E Z D R I V E VERO N A D R I V E RALEIGH COURTELDORA DRIVEPOCONO DRIVEWILKESBORO DRIVETALLADEGA DRIVESOUTHERN CROSS DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVEELDORA DRIVEGREENVILLE DRIVEELDORA DRIVE MARIETTA DRIVELAUREL RIDGE LANEBALDWYN DRIVESEBRING DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVERISI DRIVE SAM A N T H A L A N E GUN N R I D G E D R I V E PAT R I O T D R I V E KEN N E S A W D R I V E ELDORA DRIVEPOCONO DRIVEWILKESBORO DRIVETALLADEGA DRIVESOUTHERN CROSS DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVEELDORA DRIVEPATRIOT DRIVE DARLINGTON AVENUEDARLINGTON AVENUE MARIETTA DRIVELAUREL RIDGE LANEBALDWYN DRIVEWEDDINGTON ROAD MATHER PARKWAYSOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY ELDORA DRIVEFULTON DRIVEPROMENADE DRIVESOUTHERN CROSS DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVEPETA L L A N E SHUB A T A D R I V E CAM D E N L A N E AMOR Y D R I V E MATCHLINEMATCHLINE MATCHLINE MATCHLINE MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEKINNEY LOOP ROXIE LANEBRAXTON DRIVE SYMBOL & LINE LEGEND PROPERTY/ROW LINE PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY LIMITS PHASE LINE EASEMENT LINE SHEET MATCHLINE CENTERLINE OF ROAD CONTOUR LINES BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER PHASE NUMBER ACCESS WAY PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439150 Venture Dr., Suite 100 • College Station, Texas 77845 • 979.731.8000 PRELIMINARYPLANNOT FOR RECORDOFSOUTHERNPOINTE o.b.o BRAZOS COUNTY MUD NO.1552.905 ACRESBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 0 07-01-2016 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL KEY MAP DEVELOPER: GRID RACEPLEX HOLDINGS, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 PROPERTY OWNERS: McALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, L.P. 2211 NORFOLK STREET, SUITE 803 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 2015 SOPO, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 HUNTER GOODWIN ETAL. 1011 LYCEUM CT. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840GUNN RIDGE DRIVETIRADO DRIVEPETAL LANE COLBERT L A N E NOTES: 1. ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS FOR BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, MAP NUMBER 48041C0350E HAVING A DATE OF 05/16/2012, THIS TRACT IS NOT LOCATED IN A 100-YEAR FLOOD HAZARD AREA. 2. BASIS OF BEARING: NORTH ORIENTATION IS BASED ON GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION. 3. EXISTING GROUND CONTOURS ARE BASED ON CITY OF COLLEGE STATION LIDAR 2012. 4. EXISTING USE OF THIS TRACT IS FOR TEXAS WORLD SPEEDWAY AND ITS FACILITIES. 5. PROPOSED USES ARE COMMERCIAL, INSTITUTIONAL, MULTI-FAMILY, SINGLE-FAMILY, AND OPEN SPACE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SIGNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION AND MCALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, L.P. DATED MARCH 12, 2015 (AMENDED NOVEMBER 10, 2016). 6. THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER HAS ESTABLISHED AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF MARCH 12, 2015. BASED ON ARTICLE II OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA), THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL COMPLY WITH THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION AS OF THE "EFFECTIVE" DATE OF THE DA. THEREFORE, THE EFFECTIVE UDO IS THE FEBRUARY 10, 2015, SUPPLEMENT 4 (EFFECTIVE UDO). 7. SETBACK AND BUILDING SEPARATION STANDARDS FOR THE FOLLOWING ZONING DISTRICTS ARE ESTABLISHED PER SECTION 12-5.4 OF THE EFFECTIVE UDO. THE APPLICABLE ZONING DISTRICTS PER THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ARE AS FOLLOWS: a. COMMERCIAL (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) b. INSTITUTIONAL (SCHOOL) c. MULTI-FAMILY (URBAN) 8. SETBACK AND BUILDING SEPARATION FOR GENERAL SUBURBAN IS BASED ON THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, ARE NOTED BELOW: a. FRONT SETBACK = 20 FEET b. REAR SETBACK = 20 FEET c. SIDE SETBACK = 5 FEET; THE SIDE SETBACK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET WHEN THE SIDE LOT LINE IS USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTENDING PUBLIC UTILITIES WITHIN AN EASEMENT. d. SIDE STREET SETBACK = 15 FEET 9. PER THE EXECUTED STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (SPA) BETWEEN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION AND BRAZOS COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, EXECUTED AUGUST 21, 2015 AND AMENDED NOVEMBER 10, 2016, WATER AND WASTE WATER SERVICE ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY CITY OF COLLEGE STATION. 10. PER THE EXECUTED STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (SPA) BETWEEN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION AND BRAZOS COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, EXECUTED AUGUST 21, 2015 AND AMENDED NOVEMBER 10, 2016, THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION WILL, UPON ACCEPTANCE, OWN AND OPERATE ALL PUBLIC WATER AND PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES IN BRAZOS COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1. 11. WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE AND STREETS WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO THE 2012 EDITION OF THE B/CS UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 12. PER THE EXECUTED DEVELOPEMENT AGREEMENT (DA) BETWEEN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION AND MCALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, LP, EFFECTIVE MARCH 12, 2015, AS AMENDED, STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED BASED ON THE THOROUGHFARE ROAD STANDARDS AS OF THE DATE OF THE AGREEMENT AND THE PROPOSED STREET SECTIONS ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAN ARE SHOWN ACCORDINGLY. 13. STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL BE CAPTURED AND CONVEYED BY A STORM SEWER SYSTEM AND DISCHARGED INTO PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. DETENTION FACILITIES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTROL THE PEAK RUNOFF DISCHARGE TO PRE-DEVELOPMENT FLOW RATES PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2012 EDITION OF THE B/CS UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS. 14. STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING DRAINAGE CHANNELS, UNDERGROUND STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, AND DETENTION PONDS WILL BE MAINTAINED BY BRAZOS COUNTY MUD NO. 1. UPON ANNEXATION, THE MAINTENANCE OF THE DETENTION PONDS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOA UNLESS THE CITY REQUESTS A CONTINUATION OF THE MUD TAXING AUTHORITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETENTION POND MAINTENANCE AS SET FORTH IN THE DA. 15. THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE LOCAL STREETS WILL BE BASED ON AN EXECUTED INTER-LOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN BRAZOS COUNTY AND BRAZOS COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1. 16. THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE MAJOR STREETS WILL BE BASED ON AN EXECUTED INTER-LOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN BRAZOS COUNTY AND BRAZOS COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1. 17. SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. 18. COMMON AREAS AND PARKLAND WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. UPON ANNEXATION, THE PARKLAND OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY. THE REMAINING COMMON AREAS WILL CONTINUE TO BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. 19. ALL UTILITY ALIGNMENTS FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE. A MASTER HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS FOR EACH SYSTEM WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE FINAL PLATTING STAGE OF EACH PHASE THAT WILL DETERMINE LINE SIZE. 20. ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS PROVIDED BY ENTERGY. 21. COMMON AREAS RESERVED FOR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIAION WITH A TRAIL SYSTEM WILL BE PLACED IN AN ACCESS EASEMENT IF NOT WHOLLY CONTAINED BY A PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT. 22. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION EASEMENT ACTIVITIES AND/OR INFRASTRUCTURE WILL BE REFERENCED IN THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION. 23. DIMENSIONS SHOWN INTERIOR TO THE LOT, ALONG CURVES, ARE ARC LENGTHS. 24. SIDEWALKS SHOWN ARE BASED ON CITY OF COLLEGE STATION STREET SECTIONS FOR EACH ROAD CLASSIFICATION AS OF THE DATE OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 25. STREETS TERMINATING AT A FUTURE PHASE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC IF THE STREET EXCEEDS 100' IN LENGTH OR EXTENDS PAST MORE THAN ONE LOT. 26. SOME UTILITY EXTENSIONS WILL BE NECESSARY THROUGH FUTURE PHASES IN ORDER TO SERVE EARLIER PHASES. 27. PURSUANT TO THE UTILITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY FO COLLEGE SATION, TEXAS AND BRAZOS COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, AS AMENDED, SANITARY AND WATER WILL EXTEND OFFSITE TO SERVE DEVELOPMENT. a. OFFSITE SANITARY SEWER WILL BE INSTALLED FOR SERVICE AT LICK CREEK WWTP. b. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WILL TIE AT TWO LOCATIONS PER THE JULY 8TH, 2015 FREESE AND NICHOLS SOUTHEAST AREA WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION. THE SOUTHERN POINTE DEVELOPMENT IS PLANNED TO TIE INTO THE EXISTING 12” WATERLINE AT THE CURRENT END OF PEBBLE CREEK PARKWAY AND AN ADDITONAL CONNECTION WILL BE MADE TO THE EXISITNG 8” WATERLINE ON THE EAST SIDE OF SH 6. THE FINAL SIZING OF THIS WATERLINES WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THE WATER DESIGN REPORT TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PHASE 1 PLATTING DOCUMENTS. 28. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ETJ. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS BEING REVIEWED AS AN "IN CITY" DEVELOPMENT PER LETTER AGREEMENT SUBMITTED BY DEVELOPER TO THE CITY. 29. PER THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DESIGNATING FIRE STATION SITE (DATED NOVEMBER 10, 2016), THE TWO ACRE FIRE STATION OPTION SITE WILL BE GENERALLY LOCATED AS SHOWN ON THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN. 30. TEMPORARY BARRIERS WILL BE INSTALLED ON SOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY AND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY AND ROXIE LANE. THESE BARRIERS ARE TO BE REMOVED WITH THE OFFSITE EXTENSION OF SOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY. END ROAD SIGNAGE AND BARRIERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2011 MUTCD WILL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED BY DEVELOPER/HOA. 31. SIDEWALK WIDTHS WITHIN ACCESS WAYS IS PER THE EFFECTIVE UDO. 32. THE DESIGN OF THE ROUNDABOUT AND LEFT TURN LANES IN MEDIANS WILL BE FINALIZED WITH THE FINAL PLAT. 33. THE ALIGNMENT AND ANGLE OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY AND STATE HIGHWAY 6 WILL BE FINALIZED AT FINAL PLAT. 34. THE FIRE ACCESS EASEMENT ON LOT 5, BLOCK 14, PHASE 2 MUST BE ABANDONED PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 5. 35. A PIP APPLICATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PROPOSED PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN A PUBLIC ROW 1 01-05-2017 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVED BY P&Z 2 10-13-2017 REVISION - CITY SUBMITTAL (2.65 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 2D(2.49 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 2A30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 2H15' PAE COMMON AREA 2J30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 2B30' PUE/PAE PARKLAND ANEIGHBORHOOD PARK8.71 ACRES SHUBATA DRIVE 27' B-B 50' ROW PETAL LANE 27' B-B 50' ROW CAMDEN LANE 27' B-B 50' ROW AMORY DRIVE 27' B-B 50' ROW CHATOM DRI V E 27' B-B 50' R O W CONOLE C O U R T 27' B-B 50 ' R O W CHATOM DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWSYMBOL & LINE LEGEND 6" SANITARY SEWER 8" SANITARY SEWER 12" SANITARY SEWER 18" SANITARY SEWER 6" WATERLINE 8" WATERLINE 12" WATERLINE STORM SEWER FORCE MAIN FIRE HYDRANT STORM SEWER CURB INLET STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE PHASE LINE EASEMENT LINE SHEET MATCHLINE CENTERLINE OF ROAD CONTOUR LINES CONTOUR ELEVATION BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER PHASE NUMBER PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY LIMITS PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM MATCHLINE SHEET 5 MATCHLINE SHEET 3MATCHLINE SHEET 6 Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439150 Venture Dr., Suite 100 • College Station, Texas 77845 • 979.731.8000 PRELIMINARYPLANNOT FOR RECORDOFSOUTHERNPOINTE o.b.o BRAZOS COUNTY MUD NO.1552.905 ACRESBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS KEY MAP MATCHLINE SHEET 3 DEVELOPER: GRID RACEPLEX HOLDINGS, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 PROPERTY OWNERS: McALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, L.P. 2211 NORFOLK STREET, SUITE 803 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 2015 SOPO, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 HUNTER GOODWIN ETAL. 1011 LYCEUM CT. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 0 07-01-2016 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 1 01-05-2017 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVED BY P&Z 2 10-13-2017 REVISION - CITY SUBMITTAL COMMON AREA 2E(2.65 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 2D(2.49 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 3A15' PAE COMMON AREA 8A15' PAE COMMON AREA 8EVARIABLE WIDTH PAE COMMON AREA 2C15' PAE COMMON AREA 2B30' PUE/PAE PARKLAND ANEIGHBORHOOD PARK8.71 ACRES PETAL LANE 27' B-B 50' RO W KINNEY DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWCOLBER T L A N E 27' B-B 5 0 ' R O W MATHER PARKWAY54' B-B 80' ROWCHATOM DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWKATIE LOOP27' B -B 50 ' ROW WEDDINGTON ROAD 27' B-B 50' ROW QUI N L A N D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O WGUNN RIDGE DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWSHUBATA DRI V E 27' B-B 50' RO W CAMDEN LAN E 27' B-B 50' RO W AMORY DRIV E 27' B-B 50' R O W CHATOM DR I V E 27' B-B 50' R O W RISI DRIVE 27' B-B 50' ROW CROS B Y D R I V E 27' B- B 5 0 ' R O W AMO R Y D R I V E 27' B- B 5 0 ' R O W SHU B A T A D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W PETA L L A N E 27' B- B 5 0 ' R O W BRAXTON DRIVE 27' B-B 50' ROW MATCHLINE SHEET 6MATCHLINE SHEET 2MATCHLINE SHEET 4Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439150 Venture Dr., Suite 100 • College Station, Texas 77845 • 979.731.8000 PRELIMINARYPLANNOT FOR RECORDOFSOUTHERNPOINTE o.b.o BRAZOS COUNTY MUD NO.1552.905 ACRESBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS KINNEY LOOP 27' B-B 50' ROW KEY MAP DEVELOPER: GRID RACEPLEX HOLDINGS, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 PROPERTY OWNERS: McALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, L.P. 2211 NORFOLK STREET, SUITE 803 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 2015 SOPO, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 HUNTER GOODWIN ETAL. 1011 LYCEUM CT. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 SYMBOL & LINE LEGEND 6" SANITARY SEWER 8" SANITARY SEWER 12" SANITARY SEWER 18" SANITARY SEWER 6" WATERLINE 8" WATERLINE 12" WATERLINE STORM SEWER FORCE MAIN FIRE HYDRANT STORM SEWER CURB INLET STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE PHASE LINE EASEMENT LINE SHEET MATCHLINE CENTERLINE OF ROAD CONTOUR LINES CONTOUR ELEVATION BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER PHASE NUMBER PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY LIMITS PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM 0 07-01-2016 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 1 01-05-2017 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVED BY P&Z 2 10-13-2017 REVISION - CITY SUBMITTAL COMMON AREA 8D(8.32 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 4G(4.32 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 8F15' PAE COMMON AREA 8EVARIABLE WIDTH PAE COMMON AREA 4F30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 4E30' PUE/PAE PARKLAND BCOMMUNITY PARK18.62 ACRES COMMON AREA 4A15' PAECOMMON AREA 8G15' PAE COMMON AREA 4B15' PAE COMMON AREA 4D15' PAE COMMON AREA 4C15' PAE COMMON AREA 8H30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 8C30' PUE/PAEKATIE LOOP27' B -B 50 ' ROW WEDDINGTON ROAD 27' B-B 50' ROW QUI N L A N D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W RISI DRIVE 27' B-B 50' ROW SAM A N T H A L A N E 27' B- B 5 0 ' R O W ROCKFORD DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWSEBRING DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWBALDWYN DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWLAUREL RIDGE LANE27' B-B 50' ROWMARIETTA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWGUNN RIDGE DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWBALDWYN DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWLAUREL RIDGE LANE27' B-B 50' ROWMARI E T T A D R I V E 27' B- B 5 0 ' R O W MATCHLINE SHEET 7MATCHLINE SHEET 3MATCHLINE SHEET 6Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439150 Venture Dr., Suite 100 • College Station, Texas 77845 • 979.731.8000 PRELIMINARYPLANNOT FOR RECORDOFSOUTHERNPOINTE o.b.o BRAZOS COUNTY MUD NO.1552.905 ACRESBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS KEY MAP DEVELOPER: GRID RACEPLEX HOLDINGS, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 PROPERTY OWNERS: McALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, L.P. 2211 NORFOLK STREET, SUITE 803 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 2015 SOPO, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 HUNTER GOODWIN ETAL. 1011 LYCEUM CT. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 SYMBOL & LINE LEGEND 6" SANITARY SEWER 8" SANITARY SEWER 12" SANITARY SEWER 18" SANITARY SEWER 6" WATERLINE 8" WATERLINE 12" WATERLINE STORM SEWER FORCE MAIN FIRE HYDRANT STORM SEWER CURB INLET STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE PHASE LINE EASEMENT LINE SHEET MATCHLINE CENTERLINE OF ROAD CONTOUR LINES CONTOUR ELEVATION BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER PHASE NUMBER PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY LIMITS PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM 0 07-01-2016 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 1 01-05-2017 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVED BY P&Z 2 10-13-2017 REVISION - CITY SUBMITTAL COMMON AREA 2F(2.57 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 2G(2.90 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 2J30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 6A15' PAE COMMON AREA 6B15' PAE COMMON AREA 6C30' PUE/PAE ROAD D27' B-B 50' ROWNATC H E Z D R I V E 27' B- B 5 0 ' R O WDARLINGTON AVENUE27' B-B 50' ROWSOUTHERN P O I N T E P A R K W A Y 63' B-B 105' R O W KENNESA W D R I V E 27' B-B 5 0 ' R O W CHATOM DRI V E 27' B-B 50' RO W MATCHLINE SHEET 2 WAVERYLY W A Y 27' B-B 50' R O W MATCHLINE SHEET 8 Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439150 Venture Dr., Suite 100 • College Station, Texas 77845 • 979.731.8000 PRELIMINARYPLANNOT FOR RECORDOFSOUTHERNPOINTE o.b.o BRAZOS COUNTY MUD NO.1552.905 ACRESBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASMATCHLINE SHEET 6KEY MAP DEVELOPER: GRID RACEPLEX HOLDINGS, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 PROPERTY OWNERS: McALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, L.P. 2211 NORFOLK STREET, SUITE 803 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 2015 SOPO, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 HUNTER GOODWIN ETAL. 1011 LYCEUM CT. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 SYMBOL & LINE LEGEND 6" SANITARY SEWER 8" SANITARY SEWER 12" SANITARY SEWER 18" SANITARY SEWER 6" WATERLINE 8" WATERLINE 12" WATERLINE STORM SEWER FORCE MAIN FIRE HYDRANT STORM SEWER CURB INLET STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE PHASE LINE EASEMENT LINE SHEET MATCHLINE CENTERLINE OF ROAD CONTOUR LINES CONTOUR ELEVATION BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER PHASE NUMBER PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY LIMITS PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM 0 07-01-2016 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 1 01-05-2017 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVED BY P&Z 2 10-13-2017 REVISION - CITY SUBMITTAL COMMON AREA 6B15' PAE COMMON AREA 11A15' PAE COMMON AREA 3BVARIABLE WIDTH PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 8BVARIABLE WIDTH PUE/PAE PA R K L A N D J NE I G H B O R H O O D P A R K 1. 4 1 A C R E SKINNEY DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWMATHER PARKWAY54' B-B 80' ROWELDORA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWDAYTONA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWRALEIGH DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWRISI DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWSOUT H E R N P O I N T E P A R K W A Y 63' B- B 1 0 5 ' R O W PAT R I O T D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W KEN N E S A W D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W NAT C H E Z D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W GUN N R I D G E D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W SAM A N T H A L A N E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W QUI N L A N D R I V E 27' B- B 5 0 ' R O W AMO R Y D R I V E 27' B- B 5 0 ' R O W VER O N A D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W CAN T O N D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W PROMENADE DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWMATHER PARKWAY38' B-B 60' ROWPAT R I O T D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W PATRIOT DRIVE 27' B-B 50' ROW SOU T H E R N P O I N T E P A R K W A Y 63' B - B 1 0 5 ' R O W CHAT O M D R I V E 27' B-B 5 0 ' R O W KEN N E S A W D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W GUNN RIDGE DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWMATCHLINE SHEET 8MATCHLINE SHEET 5MATCHLINE SHEET 7ELD O R A D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W MATCHLINE SHEET 3 Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439150 Venture Dr., Suite 100 • College Station, Texas 77845 • 979.731.8000 MATCHLINE SHEET 9 KEY MAP CROS B Y D R I V E 27' B- B 5 0 ' R O W PRELIMINARYPLANNOT FOR RECORDOFSOUTHERNPOINTE o.b.o BRAZOS COUNTY MUD NO.1552.905 ACRESBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS DEVELOPER: GRID RACEPLEX HOLDINGS, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 PROPERTY OWNERS: McALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, L.P. 2211 NORFOLK STREET, SUITE 803 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 2015 SOPO, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 HUNTER GOODWIN ETAL. 1011 LYCEUM CT. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 SYMBOL & LINE LEGEND 6" SANITARY SEWER 8" SANITARY SEWER 12" SANITARY SEWER 18" SANITARY SEWER 6" WATERLINE 8" WATERLINE 12" WATERLINE STORM SEWER FORCE MAIN FIRE HYDRANT STORM SEWER CURB INLET STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE PHASE LINE EASEMENT LINE SHEET MATCHLINE CENTERLINE OF ROAD CONTOUR LINES CONTOUR ELEVATION BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER PHASE NUMBER PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY LIMITS PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM 0 07-01-2016 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 1 01-05-2017 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVED BY P&Z 2 10-13-2017 REVISION - CITY SUBMITTAL COMMON AREA 5B15' PAE COMMON AREA 5A15' PAE COMMON AREA 4H15' PAE COMMON AREA 8F15' PAE COMMON AREA 4A15' PAECOMMON AREA 8G15' PAE COMMON AREA 4B15' PAE COMMON AREA 4D15' PAE COMMON AREA 4C15' PAE PARKLAND CNEIGHBORHOODPARK1.07 ACRES ELDORA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWPOCONO DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWWILKESBORO DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWTALLADEGA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWSOUTHERN CROSS DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWROCKFORD DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWDAYTONA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWROCKFORD DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWSEBRING DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWBALDWYN DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWLAUREL RIDGE DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWMARIETTA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWGUNN RIDGE DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWGUNN RIDGE DRIVE 27' B-B 50' ROW PATRIOT DRIVE 27' B-B 50' ROW SOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY 63' B-B 105' ROW SAMANTHA L A N E 27' B-B 50' R O W QUINLAN DRIVE 27' B-B 50' ROW MATCHLINE SHEET 9 MATCHLINE SHEET 4 MATCHLINE SHEET 6Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439150 Venture Dr., Suite 100 • College Station, Texas 77845 • 979.731.8000 PRELIMINARYPLANNOT FOR RECORDOFSOUTHERNPOINTE o.b.o BRAZOS COUNTY MUD NO.1552.905 ACRESBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS KEY MAP ROXIE LANE63' B-B 105' ROWDEVELOPER: GRID RACEPLEX HOLDINGS, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 PROPERTY OWNERS: McALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, L.P. 2211 NORFOLK STREET, SUITE 803 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 2015 SOPO, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 HUNTER GOODWIN ETAL. 1011 LYCEUM CT. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 SYMBOL & LINE LEGEND 6" SANITARY SEWER 8" SANITARY SEWER 12" SANITARY SEWER 18" SANITARY SEWER 6" WATERLINE 8" WATERLINE 12" WATERLINE STORM SEWER FORCE MAIN FIRE HYDRANT STORM SEWER CURB INLET STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE PHASE LINE EASEMENT LINE SHEET MATCHLINE CENTERLINE OF ROAD CONTOUR LINES CONTOUR ELEVATION BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER PHASE NUMBER PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY LIMITS PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM 0 07-01-2016 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 1 01-05-2017 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVED BY P&Z 2 10-13-2017 REVISION - CITY SUBMITTAL FU T U R E M A J O R C O L L E C T O R R O W ( 8 0 ' ) COMMON AREA 2G(2.90 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 7C(5.32 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 7B15' PAE COMMON AREA 7A15' PAE COMMON AREA 11A15' PAE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PA R K L A N D F NE I G H B O R H O O D P A R K 10 . 5 6 A C R E S PARKLAND ENEIGHBORHOOD PARK1.65 ACRES RALEIGH DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWRALEIGH COURT27' B-B 50' ROWPROMENADE DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWFULTON DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWELDORA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWDARLINGTON AVENUE 38' B-B 60' ROW NAT C H E Z D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W KEN N E S A W D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W R A L E I G H L O O P 2 7 ' B - B 5 0 ' R O W G A I N E S V I L L E D R I V E 27 ' B - B 5 0 ' R O W NE V E U D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W DA R L I N G T O N A V E N U E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W GREENVILLE DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWRALEIGH DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWMATHER PARKWAY38' B-B 60' ROWELDORA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWMATCHLINE SHEET 5 MATCHLINE SHEET 6 MATCHLINE SHEET 9Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439150 Venture Dr., Suite 100 • College Station, Texas 77845 • 979.731.8000 PRELIMINARYPLANNOT FOR RECORDOFSOUTHERNPOINTE o.b.o BRAZOS COUNTY MUD NO.1552.905 ACRESBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS KEY MAP DEVELOPER: GRID RACEPLEX HOLDINGS, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 PROPERTY OWNERS: McALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, L.P. 2211 NORFOLK STREET, SUITE 803 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 2015 SOPO, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 HUNTER GOODWIN ETAL. 1011 LYCEUM CT. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840TIRADO DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWSYMBOL & LINE LEGEND 6" SANITARY SEWER 8" SANITARY SEWER 12" SANITARY SEWER 18" SANITARY SEWER 6" WATERLINE 8" WATERLINE 12" WATERLINE STORM SEWER FORCE MAIN FIRE HYDRANT STORM SEWER CURB INLET STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE PHASE LINE EASEMENT LINE SHEET MATCHLINE CENTERLINE OF ROAD CONTOUR LINES CONTOUR ELEVATION BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER PHASE NUMBER PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY LIMITS PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM 0 07-01-2016 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 1 01-05-2017 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVED BY P&Z 2 10-13-2017 REVISION - CITY SUBMITTAL COMMON AREA 9E(8.70 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA 5B15' PAE COMMON AREA 9D30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 9C30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 9B30' PUE/PAE COMMON AREA 9A30' PUE/PAE PARKLAND DNEIGHBORHOOD PARK8.58 ACRES ELDORA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWSPARTAN DRIVE 27' B-B 50' ROW DARLINGTON AVENUE 38' B-B 60' ROW POCONO DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWWILKESBORO DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWTALLADEGA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWSOUTHERN CROSS DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWROCKFORD DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWDAYTONA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWELDORA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWNE V E U D R I V E 27' B - B 5 0 ' R O W SYMBOL & LINE LEGEND 6" SANITARY SEWER 8" SANITARY SEWER 12" SANITARY SEWER 18" SANITARY SEWER 6" WATERLINE 8" WATERLINE 12" WATERLINE STORM SEWER FORCE MAIN FIRE HYDRANT STORM SEWER CURB INLET STORM SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE PHASE LINE EASEMENT LINE SHEET MATCHLINE CENTERLINE OF ROAD CONTOUR LINES CONTOUR ELEVATION BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER PHASE NUMBER PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY LIMITS DAYTONA DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWSOUTHERN CROSS DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWROCKFORD DRIVE27' B-B 50' ROWMATCHLINE SHEET 7 Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439150 Venture Dr., Suite 100 • College Station, Texas 77845 • 979.731.8000 PRELIMINARYPLANNOT FOR RECORDOFSOUTHERNPOINTE o.b.o BRAZOS COUNTY MUD NO.1552.905 ACRESBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS MATCHLINE SHEET 8KEY MAP DEVELOPER: GRID RACEPLEX HOLDINGS, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 PROPERTY OWNERS: McALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, L.P. 2211 NORFOLK STREET, SUITE 803 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 2015 SOPO, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 HUNTER GOODWIN ETAL. 1011 LYCEUM CT. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 0 07-01-2016 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 1 01-05-2017 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVED BY P&Z 2 10-13-2017 REVISION - CITY SUBMITTAL Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439150 Venture Dr., Suite 100 • College Station, Texas 77845 • 979.731.8000 PRELIMINARYPLANNOT FOR RECORDOFSOUTHERNPOINTE o.b.o BRAZOS COUNTY MUD NO.1552.905 ACRESBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS DEVELOPER: GRID RACEPLEX HOLDINGS, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 PROPERTY OWNERS: McALISTER OPPORTUNITY FUND 2012, L.P. 2211 NORFOLK STREET, SUITE 803 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 2015 SOPO, LTD. P.O. BOX 11962 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 HUNTER GOODWIN ETAL. 1011 LYCEUM CT. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 PROPOSED COMMON AREA TABLE PROPOSED PARKLAND AREA TABLE 0 07-01-2016 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 1 01-05-2017 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVED BY P&Z 2 10-13-2017 REVISION - CITY SUBMITTAL Planning & Zoning Commission December 7, 2017 Scale 3 Phases of 24 lots on approximately 50 acres Location Generally located west of the intersection of Dynasty Drive and FM 60 Raymond Stotzer Parkway, in the City’s ETJ Applicant Jim Jett Project Manager Madison Thomas, AICP, Staff Planner mthomas@cstx.gov Project Overview A Master Plan for the subject tract was approved by the Commission in March 2006 and the initial Preliminary Plat was approved in April 2006 for 17 lots over three phases. Since then the Preliminary Plat has been revised several times over the last ten years with new lot configurations, subdivisions, and phasing. The current preliminary plan revision adds two additional cul-de-sacs, one in Phase 3B and the other in 3D, extends the length of the existing cul- de-sac in Phase 3D and adds an additional 8 lots. Parkland Dedication N/A Traffic Impact Analysis N/A Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, with previously granted waivers to Block Length and Street Projections that will be retained. Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity Map & Aerial 2. Application 3. Copy of Preliminary Plan Preliminary Plan for Aggieland Business Park PP2017-000023 (4 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.:________________ DATE SUBMITTED:______________ CITY OF COU~GF.STATION TIME. Home of Texas A&M Univeicity~17 i i ~STAFF: ~iiOi~°l?__________________ PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~$990 Preliminary Plan Application Fee. ~$250 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Copy of plan.A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval. ~Title report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90) days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens, encumbrances,etc. ~Impact study (if oversized participation is requested). ~The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference N/A NAME OF PROJECT Aggieland Business Park ADDRESS JONES RD TX SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: West of the intersection of Dynasty Drive and FM 60 Raymond Stotzer Parkway APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGERS INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Jim Jeff E-mail ~ett66©gmall.com Street Address 6166 Imperial Loop,suite 10 City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840 Phone Number 979.571.4341 Fax Number 979.268.3470 PROPERTY OWNER’S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified.Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name 60-Jones Associates LTD E-mail ijett66~gmaiI.com Street Address 6166 Imperial Loop,suite 10 City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840 Phone Number 979.571.4341 Fax Number _________________________________ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER’S INFORMATION: Name Schultz Engineering, LLC E-mail /oe©schultzeng.com Street Address 911 Southwest Parkway East City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840 Phone Number 9797643900 Fax Number 9797643910 Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 6 Total Acreage 50.223 Total No.of Lots 24 R-O-W Acreage 5.687 Number of Lots By Zoning District 24 I ETJ /I Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 1.856 ,,ETJ ______/_____________/______ ____________ Floodplain Acreage 0 NOTE:Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be considered complete. Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land?_________________________________________ Are you proposing to ~develop the park ~dedicate the development fee?(Check one) This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance.Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? ~Yes flNo If yes,provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name:See Attached Sheet City Project Number (if known):See Attached Sheet Date /Timeframe when submitted:See Attached Sheet Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Waiver to Section 12-8.4.E.Block I Length 3lock Length along Matrix Drive exceeds 1.500’ Waiver to Section 12-8.4.C.Streets 3.Street Projections.a.1-3 ~waiver is requested to the requirement of projecting a public streetto the 1.00 acre tract adjacent to the Southwest )oundary of the Aggieland Business Park Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 6 Final Plat Aggieland Business Park Phase 1 RePlat Aggieland Business Park Phase 1 Lot 1 Block 1 RePlat Aggieland Business Park Phase 1 Lot 1A &lB Block 1 Final Plat Aggieland Business Park Phase 2A &2B Revised Preliminary Plan Aggieland Business Park (PP2015-000015) Final Plat Aggieland Business Park Ph 1,2A,&2B (FPCO2O16-000026) April 29,2008 January 16,2009 July 14,2009 October 10,2014 July 21,2016 September 7,2017 Regarding the waiver request,explain how: There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. See Attached Sheets The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. See Attached Sheets 3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,or welfare,or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1.~An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2.~The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative,or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City’s comprehensive Plan; 3.~A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk.Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12)months; 4.~Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate.! rural context; 5.fl When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle,Pedestrian,and Greenways Master Plan; 1. 2. See Attached Sheets See Attached Sheets Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 6 6.fl The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or 7.fl The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway /Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification,in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. NOTE:A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,correct,and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf.LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. Date of condition identified above: ~V*/1~V Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 6 AGGIELAND BUSINESS PARK Waiver to Section 12-8.4.E.Blocks.1.Block Length Justification for Waiver 1 —Block 6: The requested waiver is for Block 6,the block length along the east side of Matrix Drive which is 1716 feet in length which exceeds the maximum block length of 1,500’.This block is located between Jones Road and the southwest property boundary. 1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.The special circumstances or conditions for this Block is that the previously platted Phase 1 and Phase 3A adjoins 3B and 3D and no street was stubbed out in Phase 1 that could connect to a street from Matrix Drive.When Matrix Drive is extended a couple hundred feet to Smith Lane in the future that will break the block length.Attached is the approved Preliminary Plan for Aggieland Business Park which did not include a street to break the block between Matrix Drive and Phase 1. 2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right of the applicant.This Revised Preliminary Plan is beingproposed to decrease the size of the lots in Phase 3 which increases the number of lots.The street layout is similar to the street layout on the approved Preliminary Plan.Also,there is an existing drainageway that parallels Matrix Drive which the Developer prefers to not have a street crossing. 3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or injurious to other property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.The granting of the waivers for this development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or injurious to other property as the development will comply with all other standards and requirements. 4.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the previsions of the Unified Development Ordinance. The granting of this waiver will not affect the subdivision of other land since Phase 1 and Phase 3A is already platted and the majority of the nearby tracts will remain in their current use for a long time. AGGIELAND BUSINESS PARK Waiver to Section 12-8.4.E.Blocks.1.Block Length Justification for Waiver 2—Block 7: The requested waiver is for Block 7,the block length along the west side of Matrix Drive which is 1716 feet in length which exceeds the maximum block length of 1,500’.This block is located between Jones Road and the southwest property boundary. 5.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.The special circumstances or conditions for this Block is that the previously platted Phase 4 adjoins Phase 3C,3B and 3D and no street was stubbed out in Phase 4 that could connect to a street from Matrix Drive.Attached is the approved Preliminary Plan for Aggieland Business Park which did not include a street to break the block between Matrix Drive and Phase 4. 6.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right of the applicant.This Revised Preliminary Plan is beingproposed to decrease the size of the lots in Phase 3 which increases the number of lots.The street layout is similar to the street layout on the approved Preliminary Plan. 7.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,safety, or welfare,or injurious to other property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.The granting of the waivers for this development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or injurious to other property as the development will comply with all other standards and requirements. 8.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the previsions of the Unified Development Ordinance.The granting of this waiver will not affect the subdivision of other land since Phase 4 is already platted and the majority of the nearby tracts will remain in their current use for a long time. AGGIELAND BUSINESS PARK Waiver to Section 12-8.4.C.Streets 3.Street Projections.a.1-3 Justification for Waiver: A waiver is requested to the requirement of projecting a public street to the 1.00 acre tract adjacent to the Southwest boundary of the Aggieland Business Park. 1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. The majority of the property along the west boundary is already plattedpreventing the extension of a public street.Also,the only adjacent tract not platted is 1.00 acre in size and has a pond located on it.It is very likely that a public street would never be extended through that tract. 2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right of the applicant.A street extension in this location would be in the area proposed for storm water detention and a street projection would hinder the construction of the detention pond. 3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or injurious to other property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.The granting of the waivers for this development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or injurious to other property as the development will comply with all other standards and requirements. 4.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the previsions of the Unified Development Ordinance.It is anticipated that the adjacent tract will remain in its current rural use for a long time. PRELIMINARY PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Drawn on 24”x 36”sheet to scale of 100’per inch or larger.Include the words “PRELIMINARY PLAN - NOT FOR RECORD”in letters 1/2” high.If more than 1 sheet,an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. ~1 Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits.No scale required but include north arrow. Title Block with the following information: Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner,engineer and surveyor. ~Proposed name of subdivision (subdivision name &street names will be approved through Brazos County 911). ~Date of preparation (including the date the plat was submitted and the dates of any revisions on the plat). ~Engineer’s scale in feet. ~Total area intended to be developed. ~North Arrow. ~Location of current city limit lines and current zoning district boundary.The appropriate zoning district(s) must be in place for the proposed land uses before the application for a subdivision. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.Boundary must include all of parent tract. ~Descriptions by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within abcepted land survey standards. (Labeled on boundary lines,not separate metes and bounds description.) ~Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control point, to which ,later,all dimensions, angles, bearings, block numbers,and similar data shall be referred.The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the survey or tract,or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. ~Name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous parcels of unsubdivided land,and an indication whether or not contiguous properties are platted. ~Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and Floodway,if applicable,according to the most recent available data. ~Topographic information, including contours at two foot (2 ft.)intervals,wooded areas,and flowline elevation of streams. ~Proposed land uses (in compliance with existing zoning district). ~The location and description with accurate dimensions,bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle,degree of curvature,tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision,as well as,those within the subdivision). Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 6 Existing Proposed Streets.Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp.turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. ~Public and private ROW.locations and widths.(All existing and proposed ROW’s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. LI Alleys. LI Well site locations. LI LI Pipelines.If carrying flammable gas or fuel,also show size of line,design pressure and product transported through the line. ~Utility services (water &sanitary sewer).All existing and proposed utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas. ~Easements. ~Drainage structures and improvements including underground storm sewer and all overland systems (flow line of existing watercourses)and showing where these will discharge. Proposed channel cross sections,if any. LI A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially). LI Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages.All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. LI Greenways dedication. LI Public areas. LI Other public improvements,including but not limited to parks,schools and other public facilities. ~Proposed phasing.Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements and infrastructure costs shown to be distributed evenly throughout the subdivision. Phases must be final platted in sequential order as shown or defined on the preliminary plan. ~Are there impact fees associated with this development?LI Yes ~No Revised 5/15 ~Page 6 of 6 MATRIX DRIVEMATRIX DRIVEJones Road ROW Varies 8 1.880 AC. 9 11 16 14 15 12 7 13 19 17 18 LOT 1A-1 LOT 1A-2 LOT 1B-1 LOT 1B-2 1.725 AC. 1.725 1.151 AC. 1.151 AC. 1.148 AC. 1.885 AC. 1.833 AC. 1.078 AC. 1.151 AC. 1.527 AC. 1.219 AC. 1.151 AC. 1.485 AC. 1.490 AC. 1.987 AC.70' R.O.W.Imperial LoopImperial LoopJones Road 70' ROW 70' R.O.W.FM 60 - RAYMOND STOTZER PARKWAY1.096 ACRE LOT 23 2.197 ACRE LOT 22 LOT 24 LOT 21 1.861 ACRE 1.704ACRE 1.624 ACRE LOT 25 LOT 26 1.097 ACRE LOT 27 3.589 ACRE LOT 39 1.097 ACRE LOT 38 1.500 ACRE LOT 37 1.493 ACRE BLOCK 7 BLOCK 6 BLOCK 7 LOT 28 4.025 ACRE LOT 51 1.484 ACRE LOT 50 1.610 ACRE LOT 49 2.210 ACRE LOT 48 5.231 ACRE LOT 47 1.381 ACRE LOT 46 1.095ACRE LOT 45 1.097 ACRE LOT 44 1.100 ACRELOT 43 1.100 ACRE LOT 42 1.386 ACRE LOT 41 1.498 ACRE LOT 40 1.100 ACRE LOT 36 2.965 ACRE PHASE 3D PHASE 3C GAUGE DRIVE1.097AC. 1.077 AC. 2.047 AC. LOT 6R-1 LOT 2R 5.515 AC. BLOCK 1 2.651 AC. LOT 5R BLOCK 1 LOT 6R-2 1.093 AC. 2.103 AC. 1.100 AC. 1.077 AC. LOT 4R-1 1.100 AC. LOT 3R-1 LOT 3R-3 LOT 3R-2 LOT 4R-3 LOT 4R-2PHASE 1 PHASE 2A PHASE 2BCALIBRATION COURTCALIBRATION COURT PARAMETER COURT FUTURE EXTENSIONOF MATRIX DRIVESMITH LANE SMITH LANEPHASE 3B Dynasty Drive 70' R.O.W. LOT 20 BLOCK 6 Imperial Loop70' R.O.W.LEGEND TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PARKWAY EAST College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN AGGIELAND BUSINESS PARK 50.223 ACRES - 24 LOTS J.H. JONES SURVEY, A-26 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE: 1" = 100' NOVEMBER 2017 OWNER/DEVELOPER: 60 - Jones Associates, LTD dba Aggieland Business Park 6166 Imperial Loop, Suite 10 College Station, TX 77840 (979) 268-3195 PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD PHASE 3B: 17.597 ACRES - 11 LOTS - LOTS 21, 22, & 37-45 PHASE 3C: 2.965 ACRES - 1 LOT - LOT 36 PHASE 3D: 29.662 ACRES - 12 LOTS - LOTS 23-28 & 46-51 REVISEDVICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CITY OF BRYAN BRAZOS COUNTY CITY OF COLLEGE STATION J O N E S R D RAYMO ND STOTZER P K WY - F M 60F:\_______17-541 Aggieland Business Park Phase 3B\PRELIMINARY PLAN\Aggieland Business Park.dwg, Preliminary Plan Planning & Zoning Commission December 7, 2017 Scale 1 lot totaling approximately 1.2 acres. Location 17801 FM 2154 Applicant Schultz Engineering, LLC. Project Manager Jade Broadnax, Staff Planner jbroadnax@cstx.gov Project Overview The proposed Development Plat is located in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) and plats a 1.2 acre portion of a tract into a platted lot. Preliminary Plan Not required Parkland Dedication Community Parkland Fees totaling $625.00 will be assessed at the time of final plat. Impact Fees The property is not subject to citywide impact fees— water, sanitary sewer, or roadway. Traffic Impact Analysis Not Required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Application 3. Copy of Final Plat Development Plat for The Dairy Barn Subdivision DVPL2017-000006 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.:________________ DATE SUBMITTED:_______________ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION TIME: Home ofTexasA&M Universiey~STAFF: DEVELOPMENT PLAT APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~$990 Development Plat Application Fee. ~$250 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). ~$600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee.Fee is 1.5%of acceptable Engineers Estimate for public infrastructure,$600 minimum (if fee is >$600,the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Copy of plat.(A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review). ~Grading, drainage,and erosion control plan with supporting drainage report. ~Public infrastructure plan and supporting documents (if applicable). ~Title Report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90)days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens, encumbrances,etc. ~Paid tax certificates from City of College Station,Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ~j The attached Development Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Note:A paid tax certificates from City of College Station,Brazos County and College Station l.S.D.will be due at the time of the mylar submittal prior to filing the plat. Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference NAME OF PROJECT The Daiiy Barn Subdivision ADDRESS 17801 FM 2154 7X LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot,Block,Subdivision)A008200,BBB &CRR A-82,TRACT 1.14 SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT: ~328’SOUTHEAST OF TUSCANYPLACEALONG FM 2154 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name BEN BOETTCHER E-mail ben@bba-architects.com Street Address 4636 TUSCANY TRACE COURT City COLLEGE STATION State ~Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 9798360523 Fax Number ______________________ Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 8 PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name BEN BOETTCHER E-mail ben@bba-architects.com Street Address 4636 TUSCANY TRACE COURT City COLLEGE STATION State ~Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979-836-0523 Fax Number _________________________________ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEERS INFORMATION: Name SCHULTZ ENGINEERING LLC E-mail eng©schultzeng.com Street Address 911 SOUTHWESTPKWYE. City COLLEGE STATION State ~Zip Code 77840 Phone Number 9797643900 Fax Number 97976439b0 Total Acreage l 163 R-O-W Acreage 0 Current zoning of subject property Residential Floodplain Acreage 0 Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels)on the property?~Yes ~No Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Regarding the waiver request,explain how: 1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 8 3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. WA 4.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance WA Requested oversize participation____________________________________________________________________________ Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Development Plat: Proposed Public: ACREAGE:N/A__Streets N/A No.of acres to be dedicated +$N/A development fee N/A Sidewalks N/A No.of acres in floodplain N/A_Sanitary Sewer Lines N/A No.of acres in detention N/A Water Lines N/A No.of acres in greenways N/A Channels ORiv,A Storm Sewers FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:N/A Bike Lanes /Paths N/A No.of SF Dwelling Units X $N/A =$N/A N/A (date)Approved by Parks &Recreation Advisory Board NOTE:DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,correct,and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf.LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. I /5¼’/7 Signature and title Date Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 8 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1 No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2.The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3.If revoked,all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4.Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5.The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6.Other permits may be required to fulfill local,state,and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. 7.If required,Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre pour)and post construction. 8.Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9.If,stormwater mitigation is required,including detention ponds proposed as part of this project,it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10.In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station,measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction,erosion,and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets,or existing drainage facilities.All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project.All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11.The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications,and Standard Details.All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12.Release of plans to _____________________________________(name or firm)is authorized for bidding purposes only.I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13.I,THE OWNER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE,AND ACCURATE. ~9 j≤7’z~)7 Property Owner(s)Date Engineer Certification: 1.The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation,including detention ponds,proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2.I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local,State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES:i.e.,projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin.. 3.The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines.All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4.I,THE ENGINEER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE,AND ACCURATE. Engineer Date - Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 8 C- The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Required for Site Plans,Final Plats,Construction Plans,Fill I Grading Permits,and Clearing Only Permits:* A.I,____________________________________certify,as demonstrated in the attached drainage study,that the alterations or development covered by this permit,shall not: (i)increase the Base Flood elevation; (ii)create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii)decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv)reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances,Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area;nor (v)increase Base Flood velocities. beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. Engineer Date Initial *If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate _______letter in lieu of certification. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats,Construction Plans,and Fill I Grading Permits: B.I,____________________________________,certify to the following: (i)that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm. Engineer Date Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments: C.I,______________________________________,certify that the construction, improvement,or fill covered by this permit shall not increase the base flood elevation.I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. Engineer Date Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 8 Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate required). Residential Structures: D.I,______________________________________,certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor,including all utilities,ductwork and any basement,at an elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation.Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour)and post construction. Engineer!Surveyor Date Commercial Structures: E.I,____________________________________,certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any commercial,industrial,or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor,including all utilities,ductwork and basements,elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation Engineer /Surveyor Date OR certify that the structure with its attendant utility,ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities,ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all areas below the Base Flood Elevation,and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre pour) and post construction. Engineer!Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval:_________________________________________________________________ Revised 5/15 Page 6 of 8 DEVELOPMENT PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: (Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers~) Drawn on 24”x 36”sheet to scale of 100’per inch or larger. ~Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits.No scale required but include north arrow. ~Title Block with the following information: ~Name and address of subdivider,recorded owner,planner,engineer and surveyor. Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name &street names will be approved ~through Brazos County 911.)(Property that has been previously platted must retain original subdivision name.) ~j Date of preparation. ~j Engineer’s scale in feet. ~Total area shown on development plat. North Arrow. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. If more than I sheet,an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or Ownership and Dedication Surveyor and/or Engineer City Engineer Planning and Zoning Commission Brazos County Clerk Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Flats only) ~If using private septic systems,add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner’s Court of Brazos County,pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code. Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and floodway,if applicable,according to the most recent available data. ~j Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol)and clearly tied to basic survey data. ~j The location and description with accurate dimensions,bearings or deflection angles and radii,area, center angle,degree of curvature,tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision,as well as,those within the subdivision). Existing Proposed ~Streets.Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. ~Public and private ROW.locations and widths.(All existing and proposed ROW’s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) ~Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. larger. All applicable certification. Revised 9114 Page 7of8 Existing Proposed ~A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block. ~Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages (All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board prior to P&Z Commission consideration.) ~Building,structure or improvement or proposed modification of the external configuration of the building, structure,or improvement. Each easement and right-of-way,including alleys,within or abutting the boundary of the surveyed property. ~Any part of the property intended to be dedicated to public use of for the use of purchasers or owners of lots fronting on or adjacent to the sidewalk,alley,square,park,or other part. ~j Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24’x 36”sheets and properly sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following: ~Street,alley and sidewalk plans,profiles and sections.One sheet must show the overall street,alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision.(may be combined with other utilities). ~Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades.One sheet must show the overall sewer layout of the subdivision.(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) ~Water line plan showing fire hydrants,valves,etc.with plan and profile lines showing depth and grades.One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) ~Storm drainage system plan with contours,street profile,inlets,storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas,and runoff based on 5,10,25,50 and 100 year rain intensity.Detailed drainage structure design, channel lining design &detention if used.One sheet must show the overall drainage layout of the subdivision. ~Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E. ~Letter of Completion for public infrastructure or guarantee /surety in accordance with UDO Section 8.6. ~Drainage Report. ~j Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans). ~All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the development plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed. Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. ~j Are there impact fees associated with this development?~Yes ~j No Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit. ~j Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way?~Yes ~j No If yes,TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents. NOTE:1.We will be requesting the corrected development plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2.If the construction area is greater than 5 acres,EPA Notice of Intent (NOl)must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit. Revised 5/15 Print Form Page 8 of 8 LOT 1 1.163 AC. BLOCK 1 FM 2154 TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: DEVELOPMENT PLAT OF THE DAIRY BARN SUBDIVISION BLOCK 1, LOT 1 1.163 ACRES BBB & CRR SURVERY No. 82 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 1 LOT SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE 1'' = 30' NOVEMBER, 2017 OWNER/DEVELOPER: BEN BOETTCHER 4636 Tuscany Trace Court College Station, TX 77845 LEGEND LEGEND METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF A 1.163 ACRE TRACT BBB & CRR SURVEY, A-82 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE BBB & CRR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 82, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF A CALLED 22.219 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1 BY A DEED TO MARTIN L. SCHEHIN RECORDED IN VOLUME 8859, PAGE 46 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN A STONE COLUMN ON THE NORTHEAST LINE OF FM 2154 (100' R.O.W.) MARKING THE WEST CORNER OF SAID REMAINDER OF 22.219 ACRE TRACT AND THE SOUTH CORNER OF LOT 18, BLOCK 1, TUSCANY TRACE SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5973, PAGE 8 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE: N 49° 46' 44" E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 22.219 ACRE TRACT AND SAID BLOCK 1 FOR A DISTANCE OF 356.68 FEET (DEED CALL BEARING: N 52° 43' 37” E, 8859/46) TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD SET MARKING THE NORTH CORNER OF THIS HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT. FOR REFERENCE, A ½ INCH IRON ROD FOUND BEARS: N 49° 46' 44” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 709.84 FEET; THENCE: THROUGH SAID 22.219 ACRE TRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS: S 36° 06' 12" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 115.35 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD SET; S 35° 24' 07" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 304.60 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD SET ON THE NORTHEAST LINE OF FM 2154. FOR REFERENCE, A ½ INCH IRON ROD FOUND BEARS: S 55° 50' 57" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 225.41 FEET; THENCE: N 55° 50' 57" W ALONG THE NORTHEAST LINE OF FM 2154 FOR A DISTANCE OF 198.00 FEET (DEED CALL BEARING: N 52° 49' 51” W, 8859/46) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 1.163 ACRES OF LAND AS SURVEYED ON THE GROUND NOVEMBER, 2016. SEE PLAT PREPARED NOVEMBER, 2016, FOR MORE DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION. BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED ON THE TEXAS STATE PLANE CENTRAL ZONE GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE F M 2 1 5 4 TUSC A N Y T R A C E BEN T W O O D D RI V E DRAKE DR IVE NOR W O O D L A NE Planning & Zoning Commission December 7, 2017 Scale 2 commercial lots on approximately 1.7 acres Location 100 Graham Road; north intersection of FM2154 and Graham Road. Applicant Glenn Jones, J4 Engineering Project Manager Jade Broadnax, Staff Planner jbroadnax@cstx.gov Project Overview The preliminary plan is for the future subdivision of approximately 1.7 acres along Graham Road into 2 commercial lots, each being approximately 0.8 acres in size. 0.04 acres of Right of Way will be dedicated on the south side of Graham Road with the filing of the Final Plat. There is an existing one story commercial building on Lot 5, while Lot 4 is presently undeveloped. Parkland Dedication Parkland dedication is not required. Traffic Impact Analysis TIA is not required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Application 3. Copy of Preliminary Plan Preliminary Plan for JHW Commercial Addition PP2017-000019 108.65'49.92'108.65'49.92'1 STORY BRICKCOMMERCIAL BUILDING 100 GRAHAM ROAD PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD Engineer: PO Box 5192 Bryan, TX 77805 979-739-0567 TBPE F-9951 JHW Commercial Addition Block 1,Lots 4 & 5~1.707 Acres Robert Stevenson Survey, A-54, 1.707 Acre Tract College Station, Brazos County, Texas November 2017 Owner: JHW, Inc. PO Box 10220 College Station, TX 77845 Surveyor: Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 979-268-3195 N.T.S. ” ” ” ” ” ” ” Planning & Zoning Commission December 7. 2017 Scale 11 lots on approximately 20.54 acres. Location South side of Anasazi Bluff Drive in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Applicant Travis Martinek, Smiling Mallard Development, LTD. Project Manager Alaina Helton, Senior Planner ahelton@cstx.gov Project Overview This final plat will add 11 estate lots ranging in size from 1 acre to 2.1 acres to the Indian Lakes Subdivision. The final plat also includes 2.16 acres of right-of-way dedication. Preliminary Plan Approved September 7, 2017 Parkland Dedication Not required as this area is vested to the Indian Lakes Subdivision Master Plan. Impact Fees N/A Traffic Impact Analysis Not required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity, Aerial and Small Area Map 2. Application 3. Copy of Final Plat Final Plat for Indian Lakes Phase 33 FP2017-000026 “”‐‐‐‐“”’’’’1INDIAN LAKESSUBDIVISION December 7, 2017 Regular Agenda Rezoning – Southside Plaza To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to GC General Commercial and NAP Natural Areas Protected on approximately 2.259 acres of land located at 4075 State Highway 6 South. Case # REZ2017-000029 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the January 11, 2018 City Council meeting - subject to change). Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Summary: The applicant has requested a rezoning from R Rural to approximately 0.53 acres of GC General Commercial and approximately 1.73 acres of NAP Natural Areas Protected in order improve the already existing commercial development on the portion of the property that is proposed to be zoned GC General Commercial. The Natural Areas Protected area would provide a designated buffer area along the creek. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The majority of the subject area is designated as General Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan. This land use designation is generally for concentrations of commercial activities that cater to both nearby residents and to the larger community or region. Generally, these areas tend to be large in size and located along regionally significant roads (arterials and freeways).The proposed zoning permits commercial development along the frontage road of State Highway 6 South, allowing the property to be developed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The back portion of the property is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Natural Areas Reserved. The Natural Areas Reserved designation is for areas that represent a constraint to development, and should be preserved for their natural function. As the Comprehensive Plan is conceptual in nature and not parcel specific, the 100- year floodplain line of the creek boundary was analyzed with this rezoning application and is the proposed boundary of the NAP Natural Areas Protected zoning. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The properties to the north and west of the subject property are zoned R Rural and currently undeveloped. They were designated R Rural upon annexation, but the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use and Character Map show this area as Natural Areas Reserved with a small amount of General Commercial along the frontage road. The NAP Natural Areas Protected area is a designated buffer area along the creek that runs along the north property boundary. The property to the east is currently developed with commercial structures. This proposed zoning change would be compatible with the adjacent properties. UDO Section 12-6.4.T designates the subject tract as the only location within City limits that allows a Sexually Oriented Business as a permitted use as a response to Renton v. Playtime Theaters, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986). The designation for this tract will remain regardless of the proposed zoning change. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed zoning request to expand the commercial zoning on this property would allow the existing commercial development to redevelop. However, this tract would still remain as the one approved location for a Sexually Oriented Business for the City of College Station. The request would then provide the opportunity to enhance the site while trying to bring the existing site up to current development standards. The creek and floodplain on the north portion of this site creates a natural buffer. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property is currently zoned R Rural. The current commercial use is on the portion of the property that is designated as commercial. However, due to the property being zoned R Rural, the commercial portion is not able to redevelop or make modifications on the property. Rural uses would not be ideal here due to the size, location, and close proximity of high-classification roads and commercial uses. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property is marketed as a commercial property and has been for years. The applicant would like to continue the property’s use as a commercial site, but allow for redevelopment of the site into a conforming commercial property. This site does not have a high potential to be marketed as a rural/single-family residential development as it is located along a major freeway and adjacent to an existing commercial development. Due to these characteristics, it has limited potential with an R Rural zoning designation. Overall, the proposed GC General Commercial and NAP Natural Area Protected rezoning are anticipated to increase the marketability of the property. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: There is an existing 6-inch water main between this and the adjacent property and an 18-inch water main along SH-6. There is an 8- inch sanitary sewer main ending in a manhole near the property line, which will need to be extended to and through the property with platting. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. Existing infrastructure appears to be adequate for the proposed zoning at this time. The subject tract has frontage to the SH-6 Frontage Road. Cross access from the adjacent shopping center will need to be maintained with future site development. A TIA was not required with the rezoning application based on acreage of the proposed zoning. A portion of the subject tract is in the 100-year floodplain. The tract is also in Lick Creek’s Drainage basin and will need to provide detention for any proposed increased in impervious cover with future site development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Background information 2. Vicinity, Aerial and Small Area Map 3. Application 4. Rezoning Map NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: December 7, 2017 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: January 11, 2018 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Property owner notices mailed: Four (4) Contacts in support: None Contacts in opposition: None Inquiry contacts: None at the time of staff report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Natural Areas Reserved R Rural Undeveloped South (across SH 6) Suburban Commercial GC General Commercial Self-Service Storage East General Commercial GC General Commercial Commercial Retail West Natural Areas Reserved and General Commercial R Rural Undeveloped DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: October 1983 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation (1983) Renamed R Rural (2013) Final Plat: Unplatted Site development: Sexually Oriented Business (vacant) REVISIONSNo.Date App.© Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-439 1701 Directors Boulevard, Suite 400  Austin, Texas 78744  512.441.9493 ABCDEF1234 Final plat must be recorded by the Project Expiration Date, if applicable. Subsequent SitePlans which do not comply with the Code current at the time of filing, and all required BuildingPermits and/or a notice of construction (if a building permit is not required), must also beapproved prior to the Project Expiration Date.SOUTHSIDE PLAZA PHASE IIIRSCS ENTERPRISES, LP SITE:A005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 61, 2.259 ACRES, "SILKSTOCKING LOUNGE"Volume 13815, Page 268 OPRBCCURRENT ZONING:RURAL (2.259 AC)PROPOSED ZONING: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (0.53 AC) & NATURAL AREAS PROTECTED (1.729 AC)1REZONING PLAN NOT TO SCALEVICINITY MAPSUBJECT TRACT December 7, 2017 Regular Agenda Rezoning – University Heights Commercial Ph. 4 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Madison Thomas, AICP, Staff Planner Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “ Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from R-4 Multi-Family to GC General Commercial for approximately 5 acres located at 3635 Kenyon Dr. generally located between Paloma Ridge Drive and Kenyon Drive along Holleman Drive South. Case # REZ2017-000030 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the January 11, 2018 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Summary: The applicant has requested a rezoning for approximately 5.14 acres of land from R-4 Multi-family to GC General Commercial. The property is currently designated as Urban and in Growth Area V on the Comprehensive Land Use and Character Map. This designation calls for intense land use activities that include commercial uses. The property is currently zoned R-4 Multi-family, a zoning district for low to medium density condominium units and apartment complexes. The proposed zoning of General Commercial would better suit the current designation on the Comprehensive Plan for more intense uses. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Urban and in Growth Area V. The Urban land use designation is generally for areas that should have a very intense level of development activities. These areas will tend to consist of townhomes, duplexes, and high-density apartments. General commercial and office uses, business parks, and vertical mixed-use may also be permitted within growth and redevelopment areas. For the Urban area located within Growth Area V, the Comprehensive Plan specifically states that intense land use activities including general commercial, office uses, townhomes, high- density apartments, and vertical mixed-use are appropriate. Currently, there are a significant number of apartments and multi-family homes in the area, but limited commercial uses. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The properties to the south are zoned R Rural, but developed with duplexes, a low density multi-family use. To the north, there is Kenyon Dr. with property zoned and developed with townhomes. To the east is a four lane major arterial, Holleman Dr. S. The property to the west is also zoned R-4 Multi- Family, but is mostly either undeveloped or platted as common area. This proposed zoning change would allow for commercial uses to be built that could serve the nearby residents and the surrounding area. Currently, there are few commercial uses in this area along this arterial as most of the properties are either undeveloped or developed as residential uses. Providing additional commercial uses would benefit the surrounding residential properties and meet the intention of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: Under R-4 Multi-Family zoning the property would be allowed to develop as multi-family with apartments and condominium units at a low to medium density. The surrounding properties are currently developed as townhomes and duplexes, but also low density residential. The Comprehensive Plan for the Urban portion of Growth Area V calls for intense uses. The current zoning complies with the Comprehensive Plan, but could better address the Plan with a more intense zoning district, such as General Commercial. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property could currently develop as multi-family, as it is currently zoned for and surrounded by multi-family and townhomes. This property is located along Holleman Dr. S, a four lane minor arterial. General commercial uses are ideal along roads classified as minor arterials and higher. As mentioned before, the Comprehensive Plan calls for the urban designation in the area to provide a mix of multi-family and commercial uses. Due to the availability of access, and limited amount of commercial in the surrounding area, a commercial zoning designation would be best suited for this property. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property could be marketed as multi-family, as it is currently surrounded by multi-family development. Overall, with the amount of multi-family in the area, rezoning to GC General Commercial is anticipated to increase the marketability of the property. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water for this tract will be provided by Wellborn SUD. The tract has a 10” wastewater line available to serve the property that runs along the southwest of the property. There is a drainage swale that cuts through the property from the existing residential subdivision to the northwest. Detention is required with site development and will be accommodated with the existing Common Area 4 detention pond to the southwest. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The Thoroughfare Plan identifies Holleman Drive South as a future 4-lane Minor Arterial and there is a current CIP project underway to reconstruct this portion. The subject property has frontage to Holleman Drive South, which is classified as a future 4-lane Minor Arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan, and to Kenyon Drive, a local street. The City is in the process of completing the design of a Capital Improvement Project (CIP) to widen Holleman Drive South from North Dowling Road to Rock Prairie Road West from the existing 2-lane rural road to a 4-lane Minor Arterial with this section having a two-way center turn lane. Construction of the project is anticipated to begin in early 2018. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was submitted with the rezoning application. The TIA included other approved developments in the area and assumed the widening of Holleman Drive South to 4 lanes was completed. All intersections studied in the TIA performed at an acceptable Level of Service and no traffic mitigation was identified. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Background information 2. Vicinity, Aerial and Small Area Map 3. Application 4. Rezoning Map NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: December 7, 2017 Advertised Council Hearing Date: January 11, 2018 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Barracks Townhomes HOA Property owner notices mailed: 33 Contacts in support: None at the time of staff report. Contacts in opposition: None at the time of staff report. Inquiry contacts: None at the time of staff report. ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North (Across Kenyon Dr.) Urban T Townhouse Townhomes South Urban R Rural Duplex East (Across Holleman Dr. S) Urban R Rural Undeveloped with oil well West Urban R-4 Multi-family Partial detention facility and partial undeveloped DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 2008 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (2008) R-4 Multi-family (2012) Final Plat: Unplatted Site development: Undeveloped (4 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.:________________ DATE SUBMITTED:_____________ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION TIME. Home of ThxasA&M Universi~STAFF: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING)APPLICATION GENERAL MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~$1,240 Rezoning Application Fee. ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request. ~Copy of a fully dimensioned map a.Land affected b.Legal description of area of proposed change; c.Present zoning d.Zoning classification of all abutting land e.All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. ~Written legal description of subject property (metes &bounds or lot &block of subdivision,whichever is applicable). NOTE:If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council,another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial,except with permission of the Planning &Zoning Commission. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference ________________________________________________________________ NAME OF PROJECT University Heights Commercial Tract ADDRESS Holleman Drive South LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot,Block,Subdivision) Future Block 12,Lot 1 -University Heights Subdivision GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY,IF NOT PLATTED: outh-East of University Heights Phases 1,2,&3 TOTALACREAGE 5.139 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Kenny Melesky E-mail kenny©kmcustomhomes.com Street Address P.O.Box 505 City Millican State 7X Zip Code 77866 Phone Number 979-587-2275 Fax Number 9797036800 PROPERTY OWNER’S INFORMATION: Name KGM Rental,LLC E-mail kenny@kmcustomhomes.com Street Address P.O Box 505 City Millican State ~Zip Code 77866 Phone Number 979-587-2275 Fax Number 9797036800 Revised 1/17 Page 1 of 3 OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact,i.e.project manager,potential buyer, local contact,etc.): Name Schultz Engineering LLC-Joe Schultz E-mail /oe©schultzeng.com Street Address 911 Southwest Pkwy E. City College Station State ~Zip Code 77840 Phone Number 9797643900 Fax Number 979-764-3910 This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated June 20,2016 and recorded in Volume 13430, Page261 of the Brazos County Official Records. Existing Zoning R-4 Proposed Zoning GC Present Use of Property Vacant Proposed Use of Property General Commercial REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The amount of existing student housing and single family residential development along Holleman Drive South have created a demand for commercial uses in this area. 2.Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.If it is not,explain why the Plan is incorrect. The zoning change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan which shows the Land Use as Urban. 3.How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The zoning and uses of the nearby property are primarily for student housing.The commercial uses would serve the residents in the area who currently drive several miles for shopping and other services. Revised 1/17 Page 2 of 3 4.Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The property has access to Holleman Drive South,a 4 lane minor arterial and to 2 other streets,so it has good access and has adequate water and sanitary sewer capacity for the commercial zoning. 5.Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The property is suitable for use of multi-family residential student housing. However, there are numerous large student housing developments along Holleman Drive South and commercial uses are lacking in the area. 6.Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The property is marketable as multi-family as the access and utilities are available for the development and student housing has been successful in this area. 7.List any other reasons to support this zone change. Commercial uses that provide goods and services to the nearby residents will be beneficial to the City since the residents will not have to leave the area which may reduce the traffic going to Harvey Mitchell Parkway and Weliborn Road. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf. ~44f~7 ~~.~ ig ature and tit~/Date Revised 1/17 Print Form ]Page 3 of 3 BLOCK 1 4123 865 1079 1311 1412 15 16 17 18 2 1364513 EXISTING DETENTION POND Holleman Drive SouthBLOCK 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Kenyon Drive COMMON AREA 5 9 10 11 12 Kenyon Drive 13 14 15 16 17 COMMON AREA 7 0.104 AC. Paloma Ridge Drive COMMON AREA 8 Public Alley Los PortalesLos Portales Drive(DETENTION POND, AMENITIES & PARKING) 2 BLOCK 11 0.869 ACRES COMMON AREA 4 2.553 ACRES ZONED R-4 TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER:SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE: 1" = 40" OWNER/DEVELOPER: KGM RENTAL, LLC P.O. BOX 505 MILLICAN, TX 77866 (979)587-2275 ZONING MAP UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL TRACT 5.139 ACRES CRAWFORD BURNETT SURVEY, A-7 BLOCK 12, LOT 1 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTHPALOMA RI DGE DRIVE L O S P O R T A L E S December 7, 2017 Regular Agenda Rezoning – Spring Creek Gardens To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Alaina Helton, Senior Planner, Planning & Development Services Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix “A”, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from O Office to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 1.47 acres being a portion of Lot 1R, Block 3, Spring Creek Gardens Subdivision Phase 3, generally located at 4320 Decatur Drive. Case #REZ2017-000025 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the January 11th City Council Meeting- Subject to change.) Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the PDD Planned Development District zoning request and associated Concept Plan with the condition that the existing 6-foot masonry wall built with the existing Self-Storage Facility is required to be continued along the property line abutting the single-family property with development, and that the requested modification to provide 100% metal buildings not be granted. Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 1.47 acres located at 4320 Decatur Drive from O Office to PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning district of GC General Commercial for the use of a Self -Storage Facility. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as NAP Natural Areas Protected and GS General Suburban in the Comprehensive Plan and is a part of Growth Area II. The Natural Areas Protected land use designation is designed for undeveloped publicly-owned or private property intended for the conservation of natural areas. However, this area has no floodplain and until recently was previously developed as a natural gas well site. Therefore, the NAP designation is not appropriate for this property. The General Suburban land use designation allows for high-density single-family residential lots with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. However, neighborhood commercial and office uses may be permitted in growth areas. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of small-scale office or neighborhood commercial uses directly adjacent to neighborhoods provided that they are sensitive to surrounding residential uses and provide adequate buffering from light, noise, and parking intrusion. The adjacent property to the west was rezoned to PDD for a Self-Storage Facility in 2010. Self-storage facilities may be more intense than typical neighborhood commercial land uses, due to their potential for noise and light pollution from vehicular traffic that can be associated with this type of use. However, when the property was rezoned, the screening (6-foot masonry wall) and building architecture that was provided was complimentary to the surrounding residential properties and much more neighborhood commercial in nature. This architecture included the requirement of a 4:12 to 6:12 roof pitch and stone and brick on the building façade, similar to materials used on houses in the adjacent neighborhood. More recently, during the November 9, 2017 City Council workshop, Staff received direction to move forward with an ordinance amendment to allow self-storage facilities in the SC Suburban Commercial zoning district and those changes are forthcoming. Through this proposed PDD rezoning, the applicant is requesting a modification to the Non- Residential Architectural Standards (NRA) to allow the proposed storage buildings be one hundred percent (100%) painted metal panel siding on all sides with metal doors for accessing the storage unit. No other building materials are proposed. The applicant is also proposing to utilize the existing 8-foot wooden fence located adjacent to the single-family properties, in lieu of the masonry wall that is required by the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), and that is currently being provided with the existing self-storage facility located adjacent to the site. Though City Council has recently given Staff direction to allow self- storage facilities in the Suburban Commercial zoning district, without the screening and compatible building materials, Staff does not believe the proposed PDD meets the intent of the neighborhood commercial allowed in this growth area. Below is a comparison of the existing self-storage facility and masonry wall and images of what might be constructed under the proposed NRA and Buffering Standards. Existing Self-Storage Facility w/ Stucco-Finish Example of Self-Storage Facility w/ Metal Panel Existing 6-Foot Masonry Wall Existing Wooden Fence 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: This rezoning request is an expansion of an existing PDD Planned Development District for a self-storage facility located immediately west of the subject property. The remaining adjacent properties are currently zoned GS General Suburban and are developed for single-family uses, and property that is zoned MF Multi- Family that is currently under construction. Staff believes the small-scale storage units, such as what is proposed, can be a neighborhood-serving use and can be compatible with the nearby properties with appropriate buffering and building architecture. The existing PDD has a GC General Commercial base zoning district and is developed as a Self-Storage Facility with office space, per the PDD. In order to address concerns in the initial rezoning process regarding noise and light pollution affecting adjacent residential properties, the existing PDD provided the following conditions and community benefits: • 6-foot masonry wall required against the single family properties. • Roof pitch will vary from at least 4:12 to 6:12. • One 2-inch caliper trees required every 20 feet in the buffer yard instead of every 25 feet. • Stone and brick will be used on the building façade and will be similar to materials uses on houses in the adjacent neighborhood. Through the PDD process the property was also granted the following meritorious modification to Section 7.6.F “Minimum Buffer Standards” of the Unified Development Ordinance: • The 15-foot landscape buffer required between commercial and single-family structures may be reduced to a 10-foot landscape buffer. The applicant is now proposing the following community benefits and modifications to the City’s standards with the PDD addition: Community Benefits: • Utilize existing 8-foot wooden fence located adjacent to the single-family properties (in lieu of 6-foot masonry wall). • Roof pitch will vary from at least 2:12 to 4:12. • One 2-inch caliper trees required every 20 feet in the buffer yard adjacent to the single- family property instead of every 25 feet. • The removal of the oil/gas well, which was a nuisance for the surrounding residences, will eliminate noise, odor and truck traffic in the neighborhood. • The proposed development will not add any additional signage to this location. • The reduced building heights are a benefit to the adjacent single family residences compared to a 2‐story office building that could be located on this site. • Office use at this site could possibly have early morning and late night traffic in and out of the parking lot adjacent to the residence backyards. The proposed use will not have this potential disturbance. Meritorious Modification to the Unified Development Ordinance: Section 7.6.F “Minimum Buffer Standards” • The 15-foot landscape buffer required between commercial and single-family structures may be reduced to a 10-foot landscape buffer. • The 2 sides of the development adjacent to the multi‐family zoning, a 10' wide buffer with a proposed 6' high wooden fence and no buffer plantings are proposed. Section 7.10.F “Non-Residential Architectural Standards” • The storage buildings will not have any façade articulation. • The storage buildings will not have any architectural relief elements on the facades. • The storage buildings will have painted metal panel siding on all sides with metal doors for accessing the storage unit. No other building materials are proposed. Staff recommends that the modifications from the building materials section of the Non- Residential Architectural Standards not be approved with this request—for at least the building facades facing the perimeter of the property—and that instead the applicant provide similar building materials to those of the existing self-storage structure to ensure that the proposed buildings are physically and aesthetically compatible to the surrounding residential structures so to better meet the intentions of “neighborhood commercial” allowed in this growth area per the Comprehensive Plan. Similarly, since the applicant is requesting the reduction in the buffer yard adjacent to the single-family property, Staff also recommends that the 6-foot masonry wall be continued along the property line abutting the single-family property. The masonry wall will serve to block direct light from vehicles entering and exiting the site and will reduce some effects of noise pollution that can be associated with this type of use on the adjacent single- family houses. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the districts that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The low traffic volumes and low use levels associated with self -storage warehouses make this PDD request suitable for this property if appropriately buffered from the existing single-family houses. The small-scale storage units, such as what is proposed, along with Staff’s recommendations of continuing the 6-foot masonry wall along the single-family property and providing compatible building materials for the proposed buildings will be compatible with the nearby properties 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The subject property is zoned O Office. The O Office zoning classification is intended for commercial businesses that provide a service rather than sell a product and have relatively low traffic generation and require limited location identification. Due to the limited access and adjacent land uses and single-family residential use on the other side of the site, the number of uses usually allowed in this district may not be appropriate for this property. This property is suitable for some office uses. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: While the marketability of the property with the current O Office zoning classification may not make it the most marketable at this time, there have been professional and medical offices developed and requests in the surrounding area. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: The subject tract is located adjacent to a 12- inch water main, which runs along Decatur Drive. The subject tract is located in the Spring Creek Drainage Basin and is not encroached by a FEMA designated Special Flood Hazard Area. Development of the subject tract will be required to meet the requirements of the City’s Storm Water Design Guidelines. The development will take access from an existing driveway to Decatur Drive, which is fully built as a two-lane major collector with a raised median. A traffic impact analysis was not required for this project due to the proposed size of the project and low levels of traffic that are generated by these types of uses. The proposed project did not generate enough trips to surpass the UDO threshold of 150 vehicles trips per the peak hour. REVIEW OF CONEPT PLAN The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed land use as well as access points external and internal to the property. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD Concept Plans: 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. General: The stated purpose and intent of the requested PDD is “to provide self-storage availability for the nearby residents.” This request is to rezone approximately 1.47 acres located at 4320 Decatur Drive from O Office to PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning district of GC General Commercial for the use of a Self-Storage Facility. This will be an expansion of the boundaries of an existing PDD for Self-Storage located adjacent to the property. Modification Requested: GC General Commercial is proposed as the base zoning district with the following modifications: Section 7.7.F “Minimum Buffer Standards” • The 15-foot landscape buffer required between commercial and single-family structures may be reduced to a 10-foot landscape buffer. • The 2 sides of the development adjacent to the multi‐family zoning, a 10' wide buffer with a proposed 6' high wooden fence and no buffer plantings are proposed. • Utilize existing 8-foot wooden fence located adjacent to the single-family properties in lieu of masonry wall. Section 7.10.C “Standards for Non-Residential Standards” • The storage buildings will not have any façade articulation. • The storage buildings will not have any architectural relief elements on the facades. • The storage buildings will have painted metal panel siding on all sides with metal doors for accessing the storage unit. No other building materials are proposed. Community Benefits: The applicant offers the following as community benefits: • Utilize existing 8-foot wooden fence located adjacent to the single-family properties. • Roof pitch will vary from at least 2:12 to 4:12. • One 2-inch caliper trees required every 20 feet in the buffer yard adjacent to the single-family property instead of every 25 feet. • The maximum building height will be 18 feet. • The removal of the oil/gas well, which was a nuisance for the surrounding residences, will eliminate noise, odor and truck traffic in the neighborhood. • The proposed development will not add any additional signage to this location. • The reduced building heights are a benefit to the adjacent single family residences compared to a 2‐story office building that could be located on this site. • Office use at this site could possibly have early morning and late night traffic in and out of the parking lot adjacent to the residence backyards. The proposed use will not have this potential disturbance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the PDD Planned Development District zoning request and associated Concept Plan with the condition that the existing 6-foot masonry wall built with the existing Self-Storage Facility is required to be continued along the property line abutting the single-family property with development, and that the requested variance to provide 100% metal building not be granted. Attachments: 1. Background Information 2. Vicinity, Aerial & Small Area Map 3. Application 4. Rezoning Map 5. Concept Plan 6. Bulk Variance List FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.:________________ DATE SUBMITTED:______________ TIME: STAFF: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING)APPLICATION PLANNED DISTRICTS Date of Optional Preapplication Conference n/a NAME OF PROJECT Spring Creek Gardens Rezoning ADDRESS 4320 Decatur Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot,Block,Subdivision)Spring Creek Gardens Block 3,Lot IR GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY IF NOT PLATTED: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of ThxasAe’yM Universi~ (Check one)~($1,240)Planned Development District (PDD) ~($1,240 Planned Mixed-Used Development (P-MUD) ~($340)Modification to Existing PDD or P-MUD Amendment -Planning &Zoning Commission and City Council Review Please use Concept Plan Minor Amendment Application for minor amendments as per Section 3.4.J of the UDO. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~$340 -$1,240 Rezoning Application Fee. ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request. ~Fully dimensioned Rezoning Map: a.Land affected; b.Legal description of area of proposed change; c.Present zoning; d.Zoning classification of all abutting land;and e.All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. ~Written legal description of subject property (metes &bounds or lot &block of subdivision,whichever is applicable). ~Copy of the Concept Plan on 24”x36”paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO. ~Copy of the Concept Plan on 8.5’xl 1’paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO. ~The attached Concept Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off. NOTE:If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council,another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial,except with permission of the Planning &Zoning Commission. TOTAL ACREAGE 1.475 Acres Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 7 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGERS INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Wallace Phillips E-mail wallace.phillips@verizon.net Street Address 4490 Castlegate Dr City College Station State ~Zip Code 77845 Phone Number (979)6907250 Fax Number (979)6901 041 PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION: Name Greens Prairie Investors,LTD E-mail __________________________ Street Address 4490 Castle gate Dr City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845 Phone Number ______________________________________Fax Number _________________________________ OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact,i.e.project manager, potential buyer, local contact,etc.): Name Schultz Engineering,LLC E-mail eng©schultzeng,corn Street Address 911 Southwest Parkway East City College Station State 7X Zip Code 77840 Phone Number (979)764-3900 Fax Number (979)764~3910 This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated 2262014 and recorded in Volume 11872,Page°14 of the Brazos County Official Records. Existing Zoning 00ffice Proposed Zoning PDD-Planned Development District Present Use of Property Vacant -Previously an oil and gas well location Proposed Use of Property Commercial -self storage Proposed Use(s)of Property for PDD,if applicable: Self-storage P-MUD uses are prescribed in Section 6.2.C. Use Table of the Unified Development Ordinance. If P-MUD: Approximate percentage of residential land uses: Approximate percentage of non-residential land uses:_______________________________________________________ REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The existing oil and gas well was abandoned so the land can be developed.This zone change is to allow an expansion of the existing adjacent use.Development of single family subdivisions,the adjacent townhome and multi-family developments and the increasing number of residents in the area has created a demand for additional self-storage units. Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 7 2.Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.If it is not,explain why the Plan is incorrect. The Natural Areas Preserved land use is not appropriate since all of the adjacent property is developed.The comprehensive plan has this property as General Suburban and Natural Areas Preserved land use.The proposed uses are neighborhood commercial,so the zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan since these are uses that may be in General Suburban use areas. 3.How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The adjacent property to the south and east along Decatur Drive is under development as multi-family,which is compatible with the proposed uses. The existing residential property is the reason for the zone change as residents have indicated a need for the proposed uses. 4.Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The property is suitable for the proposed uses because it has all the infrastructure in place to develop the project and the remainder of the lot is already developed as self-storage. 5.Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The current zoning district is office and the property is suitable for the uses permitted in office zoning, however,the lack of visibility from the Decatur Drive primarily due to the large multi-family building on the adjacent property and having to drive through the existing storage facility will not make it attractive or viable for office use. 6.Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The marketability of the property for the current zoning district and full development as office uses is not high since there is significant nearby property which is zoned office or GC that is in competition with this property. 7.List any other reasons to support this zone change. The zone change will allow a development that is not intrusive to the adjacent residential neighborhood and is a transitional use. Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 7 8.State the purpose and intent of the proposed development. The proposed development is to provide self-service storage availability for the nearby residents to use. CONCEPT PLAN SUPPORTING IN FORMATION 1.What is the range of future building heights? The range of building heights will be 10’to 18’.The maximum building height will be 1W 2.Provide a general statement regarding the proposed drainage. The storm water drainage from this site will flow into an existing storm sewer system and then into the storm sewer system constructed with Decatur Drive and Arrington Road and is conveyed to the existing detention pond located in the Tower Pointe Development adjacent to the State Highway 6 frontage road. 3.List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought. See attached sheet. 4•If variations are sought,please provide a list of community benefits and/or innovative design concepts to justify the request. See attached sheet. Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 7 5.Explain how the concept plan proposal will constitute and environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area. The surrounding area is residential,single-family,townhomes and multi-family. Since this project will be an expansion of the existing self-storage facility,it will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area.The site has a unique character in that it was previously a gas well site.It is proposed to expand the existing self- storage use to this site. 6.Explain how the proposal is in conformity with the policies,goals,and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. This concept plan proposes a case that is compatible with the adjacent residential areas.The proposed plan is in conformity since the non-residential uses proposed is a “neighborhood”type commercial use. 7 Explain how the concept plan proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development. The proposed plan will provide a benefit to adjacent residents and will not adversely effect development of the adjacent property since it is fully developed. 8.State how dwelling units shall have access to a public street if they do not front on a public street. No dwelling units are proposed. g State how the development has provided adequate public improvements,including,but not limited to:parks,schools, and other public facilities. The Spring Creek Gardens development has all necessaiy public improvements and the residential development contributed to the construction and development of Castle Rock Park. Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 7 10.Explain how the concept p~n proposal will not he detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or be materially in~furious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. proposed plan is similar to an office dev&aoment which is allowed under the current zoning arid will probably lgenerate less traffic then an office development.The plan will have I access point to Decatur Drive,which is right in and right out only,so no traffic concerns are anticipated.This project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or be materially iniurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 11 Explain now the concept plan proposal will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular,bicycle, or redestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonable anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. Access tO the site will be from the existing storage facility which has access to Decatur Drive.V&Py’little traffic will be generated by the proposed use.No adverse affect on pedestrian,vehicular,or bicycle traffic should result due to this development. Please note that a complete site plan”must be submitted to Planning &Development Services for a formal review after the “concept plan”has been approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit -except for single- family development. The applicant hes prepared Ibis application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owrie.~all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.if the owner is a company, the application must be at~cof?~panied kv proof of authority for the company~s representative to sign the application on its behaff Dat~7’/~/7 Re~sed 5;j5 Page 6 of 7 CONCEPTUAL PDDIP-MUD SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A key map (not necessarily to scale). ~Title block to include: ~Name,address, location,and legal description. ~j Name,address,and telephone number of applicant ~Name,address,and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) ~Name,address,and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) ~Date of submittal ~Total site area North arrow. 100-year floodplain and floodway (if applicable)on or adjacent to the proposed project site,note if there is none on the site. Show the approximate location of the following: ~j Parking areas ~Building sites and an indication of their use ~Artificially lit areas ~Open spaces/conservation areas ~Greenways ~Streets and access ~Parks ~Schools ~Trails ~Buffer areas (or a statement indicating buffering proposed) ~Other special features ~Approximate accessways, pedestrian and bikeways. ~Common and open space areas. Revised 5/15 I ~Page 7 of 7 View.ashx %d×%d pixels https://collegestation.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=5627987&GUID=7E034CA1-F97D-4B78-A517-6EDD7AD945A1[12/1/2017 3:49:44 PM] PORTION OF LOT 1R 1.475 AC. BLOCK 3 EXISTING ZONING: OFFICE - O PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT - PDD TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: CONCEPT PLAN SPRING CREEK GARDENS 1.475 ACRES - PORTION OF LOT 1R, BLOCK 3 ROBERT STEVENSON LEAGUE, A-54 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE: 1" = 20' OCTOBER 2017 OWNER/DEVELOPER: GREENS PRAIRIE INVESTORS, LTD 4490 Castlegate Dr. College Station, TX 77845 EXISTING ZONING - O - OFFICE PROPOSED ZONING - PDD - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE A D D I S O N C O U R TCANDACE STREETDECATUR DR I V E · · · 3. List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought.  Section 12‐7.7.F Buffers   On the south side of the development adjacent to the General Suburban Zoning, it is requested  that the 6' high screen wall be replaced with an existing 8' high wooden fence and the 15' wide  landscaping buffer be reduced to 10' in width.   The 2 sides of the development adjacent to the multi‐family zoning, a 10' wide buffer with a  proposed 6' high wooden fence and no buffer plantings are proposed.  Section 12‐7.10. Non‐Residential Architectural Standards   The storage buildings will not have any façade articulation.   The storage buildings will not have any architectural relief elements on the facades.   The storage buildings will have painted metal panel siding on all sides with metal doors for  accessing the storage unit. No other building materials are proposed.   Justification for the general bulk or dimensional variations sought   Replacing the screen wall with an existing 8’ wooden fence will provide adequate privacy to the  adjacent residents in an aesthetic manner. Reducing the buffer width to 10’ from 15’ will not have  any negative effects as the additional height of the fence and the proposed landscaping will fully  buffer the proposed use from the adjacent neighborhood The spacing of the 2‐inch caliper trees  in the buffer yard will be reduced from 25’ to 20’ for the buffer along the property line adjoining  the single family homes.    There will be a solid exterior building wall along the common lot lines with the multi‐family zoning,  so there will be no activity that needs to by buffered. The proposed 6’ high wooden fence will  substantially screen the 1 story storage buildings.   The Non‐Residential Architectural Standards are not necessary since the one story buildings with  a perimeter eave height of 10’ results in the majority of the building exterior being screened from  view from the adjacent property. Also, the existing facility and the multi‐family development  screen this  property from  traffic on Decatur Drive. The addition  of architectural relief,  architectural elements and building materials required by the NRA will add no benefit to the  development, the neighbors or the public.  4. The community benefits are as follows:   The removal of the oil/gas well, which was a nuisance for the surrounding residences, will  eliminate noise, odor and truck traffic in the neighborhood.    The proposed development will not add any additional signage to this location.   The reduced building heights are a benefit to the adjacent single family residences compared to  a 2‐story office building that could be located on this site.   Office use at this site could possibly have early morning and late night traffic in and out of the  parking lot adjacent to the residence backyards. The proposed use will not have this potential  disturbance.