Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/16/2017 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionPlanning and Zoning Commission Workshop College Station, TX Meeting Agenda - Final City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting. City Hall Council Chambers6:00 PMThursday, November 16, 2017 1. Call the meeting to order. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the consideration of the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work. 17-06854. Sponsors:Golbabai 2017 Plan of WorkAttachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding bicycle parking standards. 17-06635. Sponsors:Helton Memo Current Bicycle Parking Standards Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an overview of thoroughfare classifications and their related street cross sections. 17-06826. Sponsors:Schubert Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: *Monday, November 20, 2017 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 5:00 p.m. and Regular 6:00 p.m. (Liaison - Williamson) *Thursday, December 7, 2017 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 17-06607. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: *A Rezoning for approximately .35 acres located at 1600 Texas Avenue South from GC General Commercial & SC Suburban Commercial to GC General Commercial and NAP Natural Areas Preserved. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on 17-06618. Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 11/10/2017 November 16, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Agenda - Final October 5, 2017, and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on October 26, 2017, and voted (7-0) to approve the request. *A Comprehensive Plan Amendment for approximately seven acres located at 801 Lincoln Avenue amending the Eastgate Neighborhood Plan. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on October 19, 2017, and the motion to recommend approval failed (1-3). The City Council heard this item on November 9, 2017, and voted (4-2) to approve the request. *A Rezoning for approximately seven acres located at 801 Lincoln Avenue from GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development District. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on October 19, 2017, and voted (4-0) to recommend approval, with conditions. The City Council heard this item on November 9, 2017, and voted (6-0) to approve the request. 9.Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board. 10.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 11. Adjourn. The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. APPROVED _____________________ City Manager I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on November 13, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. _____________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 11/10/2017 November 16, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Agenda - Final not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 11/10/2017 Page 1 of 6 2017 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work Comprehensive Plan Items Implementation of Adopted Plans Summary: Implementation of adopted master plans and neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely: Central College Station, Eastgate, Southside Area, Wellborn Community, and South Knoll Area neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian & Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste Water, Medical District, and Economic Development master plans. Project Dates: 12/7/2017: Presentation of UDO & Comp Plan Annual Review (JP & LH) Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion: Thoroughfare Plan Update Summary: The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is in the process of updating its Concept Map for the BCS region. Once adopted by the MPO, the city is anticipating taking action to amend the Thoroughfare Plan to align with the changes in the MPO’s regional Concept Map. Project Dates: 06/15/17: Provide an update on the BCS Thoroughfare Concept Map as adopted by the MPO and provide information on the City’s next steps to amend the current Thoroughfare Master Plan. Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (JS) 11/16/17: Presentation of ordinance amendment aligning the City’s Thoroughfare Plan with the adopted MPO Plan. 11/16/17: Workshop presentation on thoroughfare classifications. Staff Assigned: Jason Schubert Initiated: June 15, 2017 Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan Update Summary: Bring additional updates to the Planning and Zoning Commission as the Master Plan update moves forward. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Venessa Garza Anticipated Completion: Winter 2018 Page 2 of 6 Neighborhood Integrity Items *Traffic Calming Toolkit Summary: Receive information regarding the current traffic calming policy and devices (speed pillows, etc.), and including updates as recommended by the Council Transportation and Mobility Committee. Additionally receive update on the implementation of the neighborhood parking toolbox created by the Neighborhood Transportation Task Force. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Troy Rother & Jason Schubert Anticipated Completion: January 2018 Student Housing in Established Single-Family Neighborhoods Summary: Research best practices from peer university communities regarding the management of student housing in single-family neighborhoods. Explore the possibility of expanding options for Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO), mitigate the impacts to on-street parking and drainage and provide educational opportunities for Homeowner’s Associations and Neighborhood Associations Project Dates: 4/20/17: Follow up discussion regarding the presentation on student housing in established single-family neighborhoods. 8/17/17: Presentation on Neighborhood Services (Barbara Moore) 10/19/17: P&Z presentation on student housing in established single-family neighborhoods. 11/9/17: City Council presentation on student housing in established single-family neighborhoods. Staff Assigned: Jenifer Paz, Rachel Lazo & Jade Broadnax Anticipated Completion: November 9, 2017 UDO Regulatory Items Update on Off-Street Parking Requirements Summary: Provide options to allow flexibility to off - street parking requirements. Receive direction on future UDO text amendments. Project Dates: 5/4/17: Additional presentation and discussion on potential amendments or additions to the City’s current off-street parking requirements. 8/3/2017: Presentation of Draft UDO Amendments to 12-7.3 Off-Street Parking Requirements. 8/24/2017: UDO Amendments to 12-7.3 Off- Street Parking Requirements adopted by City Council. Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Completed: August 24, 2017 Page 3 of 6 Evaluation of UDO Regulations Summary: Project Dates: Review UDO requirements that add minimal value as identified by staff and consider opportunities to reduce regulations and streamline processes. 06/01/17 Presentation of staff's initial list of identified opportunities to reduce regulations and streamline processes. 06/15/2017: Comprehensive Plans and Rezoning staff reports revised to new coversheet format. 7/6/2017: Presentation of Draft UDO Amendments to eliminate certain screening requirements and eliminate the visual treatment for exposed concrete. 7/27/17: City Council adopts ordinance amendment to eliminate certain screening requirements and eliminate the visual treatment for exposed concrete. 8/3/2017: Presentation of Draft UDO Amendment on Off-Street Parking Requirements which includes the elimination of large parking lot concepts and allowing laydown curbs adjacent to buildings. Also, Preliminary Plan and Final Plat staff reports revised to new abbreviated format. 8/24/2017: The elimination of large parking lot concepts, allowing laydown curbs adjacent to buildings, and adopted by City Council as part of revisions to the parking ordinances. 8/30/17: Public meeting held for feedback on staff proposals regarding Preliminary Plans and Non- Conformities. 9/11/17: City Council adopted ordinance amendment increasing discretion granted to staff regarding requirements for easements. Provides flexibility to the requirement for 20-foot PUEs at the rear of all lots. 9/21/17: Presentation on staff’s initial ideas and public feedback for UDO amendments for changes to the preliminary plan process and requirements for non-conforming properties. 11/16/17: P&Z Presentation of ordinance amendments for preliminary plans and non- conformities. 12/7/17: Anticipated ordinance amendment presentation to streamline NRA requirements. 12/21/17: Anticipated ordinance amendment updating the review criteria for comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings. Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Initiation: June 1, 2017 Page 4 of 6 Sign Ordinance Revisions Summary: Review and update the City’s sign ordinance in light of the recent Supreme Court decision regarding sign regulations based upon content. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Molly Hitchcock, Rachel Lazo & Legal Anticipated Completion: Winter 2018 Suburban Commercial Land Use and Zoning Summary: Under City Council direction, review current Comprehensive Plan land use description and zoning ordinance requirements of the Suburban Commercial zoning district and provide options for future text amendments. Project Dates: 8/30/17: Public meeting held for feedback on staff proposals regarding options for the Suburban Commercial zoning district. 10/5/17: P&Z presentation on staff’s initial ideas and public feedback for changes to the Suburban Commercial zoning district. 11/9/17: City Council presentation on staff’s initial ideas and public feedback for changes to the Suburban Commercial zoning district. Staff Assigned: Madison Thomas, Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton Anticipated Initiation: October 5, 2017 Bicycle Rack Standards Summary: Under City Council direction, review current non- residential parking requirements for providing on- site bicycle parking facilities. Project Dates: 9/5/17: Presentation to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board on current bicycle parking requirements and staff’s recommended revisions. 9/7/17: Presentation to Planning and Zoning Commission on current bicycle parking requirements and staff’s recommended revisions. 11/16/17: Follow-up presentation on bicycle parking requirements. Staff Assigned: Alaina Helton & Madison Thomas Anticipated Completion: December 2017 Non-Residential Landscaping Requirements Summary: Review current city landscaping requirements (including streetscaping and buffer standards) and the water usage needed to maintain current landscaping requirements. Explore options for water-conserving landscaping. Project Dates: 8/30/17: Public meeting held for feedback on staff proposals regarding options for the Suburban Commercial zoning district. 9/21/17: Presentation on staff’s initial ideas and the public feedback on those ideas regarding non-residential landscaping requirements. Staff Assigned: Rachel Lazo, Madison Thomas, Jade Broadnax Anticipated Completion: December 2017 Page 5 of 6 On-Going Items Economic Development Updates Summary: Receive regular updates from the Economic Development Department regarding the vision and implementation of the commercialization of TAMU research- related output, including examples of successful efforts elsewhere. Additionally, receive an update on the recent announcement regarding plans for the TAMU System Rellis Campus revitalization effort. Project Dates: 06/15/17: Presentation of a quarterly update on Economic Development efforts and land availability for commercial uses. Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (NR) 12/7/17: Planned presentation of a quarterly update on Economic Development efforts and land availability for commercial uses. Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (NR) Staff Assigned: Economic Development Anticipated Completion: On-Going Semi-Annual Review of Pre-Application Conference Surveys Summary: Provide an update on the survey results from the Pre-Application Conference process. Project Dates: 3/16/17: Provided an update on the status of the PAC meeting process and implementation of the PAC survey. Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (MB) 12/7/17: P&Z Workshop presentation to provide an update on the status of the PAC meeting process and implementation of the PAC survey. (JG) Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Completion: On-Going Educational/Informational Items Parkland Dedication Summary: Review of parkland dedication requirements and available resources. Project Dates: 7/6/17: Staff presented information regarding parkland dedication requirements and summary or parks and greenways master plan. Staff Assigned: Jenifer Paz Completed: July 6, 2017 Sidewalk Fee-in-Lieu Summary: Review of sidewalk fund requirements and available resources. Project Dates: 9/21/17: Staff presenting information regarding sidewalk fund requirements and available resources. Staff Assigned: Lauren Hovde & Rachel Lazo Completed: September 21, 2017 Page 6 of 6 Block Length and Block Perimeter Summary: Review of current requirements regarding block length and block perimeter. Project Dates: 8/3/2017: Presentation of a review of current requirements regarding block length and block perimeter. Follow-up presentation requested for staff proposed amendments to this section. Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai & Jason Schubert Completed: August 3, 2017 Public Hearing Notifications Summary: Review current community notification requirements and practices for cases involving a public hearing. Project Dates: 12/7/17: Anticipated staff presentation regarding current community notification requirements and practices for cases involving a public hearing. Staff Assigned: Lance Simms Anticipated Completion: December 7, 2017 Mueller Report Update Summary: Update on the implementation of the 2013 Organizational Review of P&DS (AKA “Mueller Report”) Project Dates: 07/20/17: Presentation of an update on the implementation of the Mueller Report. Staff Assigned: Lance Simms Completed: July 20, 2017 Review of Development Fees Summary: Evaluation of the effect of development fees on the price of single family housing to the homeowner and an overview of the financial context of development fees for the City. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai & Alaina Helton Anticipated Completion: Spring 2018 MEMORANDUM November 16, 2017 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Alaina Helton, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Proposed Revisions to Bicycle Parking Standards Item: Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding bicycle parking standards as part of the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work. Background: At the request of City Council, Planning and Development Services provided a history and overview of the City’s current bicycle parking standards at the March 9, 2017 Council Workshop. Following this presentation, City Council directed Staff to reexamine the standards to increase development flexibility and reduce requirements for land uses that are predominately auto-oriented. This was then subsequently added as an item to the Planning and Zoning Commission’s 2017 Plan of Work. Staff presented proposed revisions to the bicycle parking standards to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board on September 5th and the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 7th. Upon the Planning & Zoning Commission’s request, Staff has since revised its proposals and reached out to the private sector for input. At the November 16th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, staff will bring forward revised bicycle parking options that increase flexibility to the existing ordinance. Those options include:  Eliminating required bicycle parking for Self-Storage, Industrial and Manufacturing land uses and property located in the Rural Zoning District.  Reducing minimum bicycle parking requirements from four bicycles to two (one bicycle rack).  Reducing bicycle parking requirements where bicycle infrastructure is not present or proposed.  Proposing options for market-driven bicycle parking requirements. Staff is seeking direction on this item from Planning and Zoning Commission before recommendations are brought forward to City Council at a future workshop. This item is anticipated to return to the Commission as a future ordinance amendment. Attachments:  Current Bicycle Facilities Standards Chapter 12: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE Article 7. General Development Standards Sec. 12-7.2. General Provisions. J. Bicycle Facilities. 1. Number Required. a. For sites subject to the Non-Residential Architectural Standards of this UDO except for MU Mixed-Use districts: 1. Each primary building shall provide a facility capable of storing a minimum of four (4) bicycles. 2. In multi-tenant buildings in excess of twenty thousand (20,000) gross square feet, one (1) or more facilities capable of storing eight (8) bicycles shall be provided. b. In MU Mixed-Use districts, bicycle storage facilities shall be provided at a rate [of] one (1) bicycle for every 15,000 square feet of non-residential uses, and one (1) bicycle for every two (2) dwelling units. c. Refer to the Alternative Parking Plan Section for the potential to substitute additional bicycle facilities for vehicular parking. 2. Placement and Design. a. Facilities shall be separated from motor vehicle parking to protect both bicycles and vehicles from accidental damage and shall be sufficiently separated from building or other walls, landscaping, or other features to allow for ease and encouragement of use. This separation shall be a minimum of three (3) feet. b. Where bicycle facilities are provided for four (4) bicycles, the area for such a facility shall be approximately fifty-four (54) square feet in area, approximately nine (9) feet by six (6) feet or as approved by the Administrator. c. Facilities shall be placed in clearly designated, safe, and convenient locations and such that no primary building entrance is further than one hundred fifty (150) feet from a bicycle facility. d. Bicycles may be permitted on sidewalks or other paved surfaces provided that the bicycles do not block or interfere with pedestrian or vehicular traffic. e. Bicycle facilities shall be constructed so as to enable the user to secure a bicycle by locking the frame and one (1) wheel of each bicycle parked therein. Facilities must be easily usable with both U-locks and cable locks and support the bicycle frame at two (2) points. Facilities shall be anchored securely to the ground. Planning and Zoning Commission Regular College Station, TX Meeting Agenda - Final City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting. City Hall Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, November 16, 2017 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 4. Consent Agenda Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from meetings. Jane Kee ~ November 16, 2017 17-06994.1 Jane KeeAttachments: Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes. *October 19, 2017 ~ Workshop *October 19, 2017 ~ Regular 17-06484.2 October 19 2017 Workshop October 19 2017 Regular Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Development Plat for Equity Real Estate Subdivision consisting of one commercial 17-06764.3 Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 11/13/2017 November 16, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final lot on approximately 2 acres, generally located at the northeast intersection of Wellborn Road and Navarro Drive. Case #DVPL2017-000007 Sponsors:Hovde Staff Report Vicinity, Aerial, and SAM Application Development Plat Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Brewster Pointe consisting of 114 lots on approximately 34.5 acres generally located at 3451 Barron Cut-Off Road. Case #PP2017-000020 17-06914.4 Sponsors:Lazo Staff Report Vicinity Map & Aerial Application Preliminray Plan Revised Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Summit Crossing Phase 3A consisting of 2.209 acres right-of-way dedication, and 0.227 acres Parkland Dedication on approximately 2.5 acres generally located north of Harvey Road and west of FM 158. Case #FP2016-000042 17-06894.5 Sponsors:Lazo Staff Report Vicinity Map & Aerial Application Final Plat Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Summit Crossing Phase 3B consisting of 60 single-family lots, 1.715 acres right-of-way dedication, and 0.026 acres Parkland Dedication on approximately 7.3 acres generally located north of Harvey Road and west of FM 158. Case #FP2016-000043 17-06904.6 Sponsors:Lazo Staff Report Vicinity & Aerial Phase 3B Application Phase 3B Final Plat Attachments: Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 11/13/2017 November 16, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Reese Cove Subdivision consisting of 7 residential lots on approximately 13 acres located at 11071 Favor Road, generally located at the north intersection of N. Dowling Road and Favor Road. Case #PP2017-000017 17-06624.7 Sponsors:Paz Staff Report Vicinity Map & Aerial Application Preliminary Plan Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for University Heights Subdivision Phase 4 consisting of 18 multi-family lots on approximately 9 acres, generally located at the southwest intersection of Holleman Drive South and Kenyon Drive. Case #FP2016-000028 17-06744.8 Sponsors:Hovde Staff Report Vicinity Map, Aerial, and SAM Application Final Plat Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 consisting of 100 townhouse lots and 7 common areas on on approximately 14.6 acres located at 4050 Holleman Drive South. Case #FP2017-000004 17-06944.9 Sponsors:Lazo Staff Report Vicinity & Aerial Final Plat Supporting Info (Application) Final Plat Attachments: Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Tarrow Townhomes consisting of 11 residential lots on approximately 1.67 acres and one discretionary item for payment into the Sidewalk Fund located at 200 Tarrow Street, generally located west of the intersection of Tarrow Street and Autumn Circle, north of Chimney Hill 17-06956. Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 11/13/2017 November 16, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final Subdivision, and immediately south of the City limit line. Case #FP2017-000014 Sponsors:Lazo Staff Report Vicinity & Aerial Discretionary Request Application Final Plat Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Development Plat for The Ranch at Arrington consisting of one multi-family lot and 0.35 acres of right-of-way dedication on approximately 12 acres located at 1650 Arrington Road, generally located south of the intersection of South Oaks Drive and Arrington Road. Case #DVPL2017-000002 17-06967. Sponsors:Lazo Staff Report Vicinity Map & Aerial Waiver Request 1 Waiver Request 2 Waiver Request 3 Application Plat Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use & Character Map from Business Park to Urban for approximately 11 acres generally located at 8822 Burges Lane and near the east intersection of State Highway 47 and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. Case #CPA2017-000015 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the December 14, 2017 City Council Meeting- Subject to change.) 17-06838. Sponsors:Paz WP 47 CPA - Staff Report Background Information Aerial Application Comp Plan Exhibit Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development 17-06979. Page 4 College Station, TX Printed on 11/13/2017 November 16, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 12-4.2, “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District and R Rural to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 11 acres at 8822 Burgess Lane and near the east intersection of State Highway 47 and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. Case #REZ2017-000024 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the December 14, 2017 City Council Meeting- Subject to change.) Sponsors:Paz 47 REZ Staff Report Background Information SAM & Aerial Application 1 Application 2 Rezoning Map Concept Plan Attachments: 17-066410. Sponsors:Helton Staff Report Background Information Vicinity, SAM & Aerial Application Rezoning Map Conceptual Plan Landscape Plan Jackson Hole Site Photos Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 2.2 “Planning & Zoning Commission”, Section 2.8 “Administrator”, Section 2.12 “Summary of Review Authority”, Section 3.2 “General Approval Procedures”, and Section 3.4 “Plat Review” related to the review authority and processing of preliminary plans. Case #ORDA2017-000012 (Note: Final action on this item will be considered at the December 14, 2017 City Council meeting - subject to change.) 17-066611. Sponsors:Simms Page 5 College Station, TX Printed on 11/13/2017 November 16, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final P&Z Memo Sec 2.2. Redlined Sec 2.8. Redlined Sec 2.12 Redlined Sec 3.2 Redlined Section 3.4 Redlined Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Section 9.2 “Nonconforming Uses”, Section 9.3 “Nonconforming Structures”, and Section 7.10.C.4 “Building Materials” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas to permit increased flexibility for non-conforming uses and structures. Case #ORDA2017-000013 (Note: Final action on this item will be considered at the December 14, 2017 City Council meeting - subject to change.) 17-067712. Sponsors:Golbabai Memo UDO Amendment Sec. 9.2, 9.3 UDO Redline Sec. 7.10.C.4 Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the College Station Comprehensive Plan by amending the Thoroughfare Plan and the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan to incorporate revisions related to the Bryan/College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization 2050 Thoroughfare Concept and other City-initiated changes and clean up items. Case #CPA2017-000019 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the November 20, 2017 City Council meeting- subject to change.) 17-068113. Sponsors:Schubert Memo MPO 2050 Thoroughfare Concept Typical Thoroughfare Cross Sections Existing and Proposed Thoroughfare Plan Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Spreadsheet List of Proposed Amendments Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 1.6, "Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas to 17-068014. Page 6 College Station, TX Printed on 11/13/2017 November 16, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final recognize locational flexibility to ensure consistency among various City master plan components and clarify that plan depictions may be updated as development occurs. Case #ORDA2017-000015 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the November 20, 2017 City Council meeting- subject to change.) Sponsors:Schubert Memo Ordinance Redline Attachments: 15. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 16. Adjourn The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. APPROVED _____________________ City Manager I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on November 13, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. _____________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Page 7 College Station, TX Printed on 11/13/2017 November 16, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 8 College Station, TX Printed on 11/13/2017 Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name Jane Kee Request Submitted on November 2, 2017 I will not be in attendance at the meeting on November 16, 2017 for the reason specified: (Date) Unavailable for November 16th P&Z Meeting. Signature Jane Kee October 19, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Workshop Meeting October 19, 2017 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Elianor Vessali, Keith Williamson and Jeremy Osborne COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham, Johnny Burns and Bill Mather CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Julie Schultz, Blanche Brick, Jerome Rekotrik CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Carol Cotter, Justin Golbabai, Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton, Jade Broadnax, Jason Schubert, Erika Bridges, Anthony Armstrong, Debbie Eller, Mary Ann Powell, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call the meeting to order. Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. There was no discussion. 3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. 4. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff. *Final Plat ~ Minor Plat ~ W.C Boyett Subdivision Block 15 Lot 4R ~ Case #FP2016-000046 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the consideration of the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work. Planning Administrator Golbabai presented updates on 2017 P&Z Plan of Work to the Commission. 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding student housing in established single-family neighborhoods as described in the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work. Principal Planner Paz presented Staff recommendations on this item to the Commission including changes to off-street parking, accessory uses and single-family overlay districts. Chairperson Kee asked if information on Code Enforcement in benchmark cities was available. Principal Planner Paz stated that she will work to gather that information. October 19, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 Commissioner Osborne asked for clarification on contextual setbacks. Principal Planner Paz described contextual setbacks to the Commission explaining that these setbacks help retain the existing character of the neighborhood. Commissioner Vessali asked legal about implications about requiring garages in established areas containing existing homes without garages. Deputy City Attorney Powell stated that existing properties would be grandfathered, but new homes will be responsible for adhering to any new amendments. The Commission agreed on staff’s recommendations including off-street parking requirements (one parking space per bedroom) and allowing property owners to rent accessory structures. The Commission also expressed support for giving neighborhoods the option of implementing a “no more than two unrelated occupants” and requiring a garage as part of a single-family overlay district. 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding bicycle parking standards. This item will be heard at a future Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. 8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: *Thursday, October 26, 2017 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison – Kee) *Thursday, November 2, 2017 ~ No P&Z Meeting *Thursday, November 16, 2017 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 9. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: *A Rezoning for approximately 11 acres located at 410 Texas Avenue from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 21, 2017, and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on October 12, 2017, and voted (6-0-1) to approve the request. *A Compressive Plan Amendment amending the Thoroughfare Plan to realign a future Minor Collector roadway at Harpers Ferry Road and Arrington Road. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on October 5, 2017, and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on October 12, 2017, and voted (5-2) to approve the request. *A Comprehensive Plan Amendment amending Exhibit “A” of such plan by amending Maps B and C within the “Parks and Recreation Master Plan”. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 21, 2017, and voted (5-1) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on October 12, 2017, and voted (7-0) to approve the request. *A Ordinance Amendment amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 8.8(A) “Purpose”, 8.8(C)(9) “Use of Fees” and Section 8.8(F)(2) “Special Fund; Right to Refund”. The October 19, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 21, 2017, and voted (5-1) to recommend approval of 8.8(A) and 8.8(C)(9), and the motion to approve 8.8(F)(2) failed (1-5). The City Council heard this item on October 12, 2017, and Council recommended staff to bring back with changes to the ordinance to include: extending the right to refund term to “10 years” from 5 years and added the verbiage to include “encumbered by contract or purchase order or extended” in relation to the use of collected Parkland dedication fees. Additionally, Council recommended a change to the ordinance for the right to refund to be automatic and not by request. 10. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Bio Corridor Board. There was no discussion. 11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Osborne asked for a brief presentation on road designation, design and construction process. 12. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Jane Kee, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin. Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services October 19, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 6 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting October 19, 2017, 7:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Elianor Vessali, Keith Williamson and Jeremy Osborne COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham, Johnny Burns and Bill Mather CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Julie Schultz, Blanche Brick, Jerome Rektorik CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Carol Cotter, Justin Golbabai, Alaina Helton, Jason Schubert, Anthony Armstrong, Venessa Garza, Mary Ann Powell, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Hear Citizens 4. Consent Agenda 4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from meetings. *Johnny Burns ~ October 19, 2017 *Bill Mather ~ October 19, 2017 *Casey Oldham ~ October 19, 2017 4.2 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes. *October 5, 2017 Workshop *October 5, 2017 Regular 4.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Bridgewood Phase 3 consisting of 423 clustered single-family lots on approximately 12.49 acres located on the southeast corner of W.S. Phillips Parkway and Brewster Drive. Case #FP2015-000036 Commissioner Osborne motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1 - 4.3. Commissioner Williamson seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0). Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed. October 19, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 6 6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan – Eastgate Neighborhood Plan, Chapter 1 – Community Character, “Site Development Area 1 – Lincoln Avenue” to allow for vehicular access to Lincoln Avenue to approximately 7.5 acres being generally located at 801 Lincoln Avenue. Case #CPA2017-000010 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the November 9, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change) Senior Planner Helton presented this Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Commission, and recommended approval. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert was available to discuss the proposed street connection, and Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) performed on the subject property. Chairperson Kee asked about the level of service and traffic counts for various intersections in the area. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert explained that the TIA was performed on the development of 7.5 acres and the change in traffic patterns as a result of the proposed connection and development. Chairperson Kee asked if the trip amount on Munson Avenue added in the additional traffic from the new development. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that the TIA was done on the five local intersections assuming a three percent annual growth in traffic. Applicant, Crissy Hartl, Mitchell & Morgan Engineers, was available to present to the Commission on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning for the property at 801 Lincoln Avenue. Manu Isaac, Kimley Horn and Associates, Bryan, was available to speak on the TIA completed on this area. Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing. Quint Foster, 1007 Walton Drive, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for neighborhood integrity. Joel Cantrell, 1211 Marstellar Avenue, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for traffic mitigation, through traffic, Eastgate Neighborhood Plan, and block length. Suzanne Droleskey, 1109 Ashburn Avenue, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for the revision of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, block breaks, neighborhood integrity, cut-thru traffic, and access ways. Rachel Smith, 1203 Marstellar Avenue, College Station, asked for clarification on the information studies performed in the TIA. Mr. Isaac stated that the TIA was performed on the traffic that will be a result of the new connection. October 19, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 6 Hugh Lindsay, 412 Tarrow Street, College Station, was available to speak on the previous rezoning recommendations for the property. Sherri Frisk, 1004 Ashburn Avenue, College Station, shared a letter from concerned citizen, Leslie Miller, stating opposition to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for neighborhood integrity, property access, traffic increase, and neighborhood preservation. Hugh Stearns, 316 Suffolk Avenue, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for neighborhood identity and neighborhood integrity. Dean Boyd, 1202 Ashburn Avenue, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for neighborhood integrity and neighborhood preservation. Kevin Brightwell, 901 Ashburn Avenue, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for neighborhood integrity and increased traffic. Kris Boyd, 1202 Ashburn Avenue, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for traffic, and requesting more time for the issue to be discussed before approval is given by Commission or Council. Gary Halter, 1204 Ashburn Avenue, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for traffic. Richard Smith, 703 Francis Drive, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for neighborhood integrity, and requesting more time for the issue to be discussed before approval is given by Commission or Council. Steven Miller, 906 Munson Avenue, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for connectivity, zoning concerns, and neighborhood integrity. Chris Reyes, Transwestern Retail, was available to speak in support of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing conditions required for a successful mixed-use development. Charles Vesperman, 1207 Ashburn Avenue, College Station, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment citing concerns for connectivity, traffic concerns, and safety concerns. Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing. Commissioner Osborne asked about a previous study showing Lincoln Avenue with an unacceptable level of service. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that the Thoroughfare Plan shows the level of service for Lincoln Avenue between Tarrow Street and University Drive has a tolerable designation and west of Tarrow Street is unacceptable with the output of the travel demand model. Mr. Schubert continued to say that the TIA confirmed a volume to capacity ratio as tolerable in this area. Commissioner Osborne asked if there were going to be upgrades to the intersections in this area. October 19, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 6 Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that Lincoln Avenue and Francis Drive are scheduled to be reconstructed. Commissioner Vessali asked if there had been a study performed for people traveling to and from Vassar Court and Wellesley Court from Lincoln Avenue. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated Vassar Court and Wellesley Court with Tarrow Street were not part of the current analysis. Commissioner Vessali asked about the possibility of cut-thru traffic from Munson Avenue to University Drive. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that the section that exists as a private drive/access easement and the extension would have the qualities of a street to be used. Commissioner Williamson asked about the Eastgate Neighborhood Plan’s statement of restricting access or prohibiting access to Lincoln Avenue with through streets. Director of Planning & Development Services Simms stated that language in the text of the Eastgate Neighborhood Plan would need to be amended to state specifics such as restricting or prohibiting access to Lincoln Avenue. Commissioner Osborne motioned to recommend approval of the changes to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Vessali seconded the motion. There was general discussion. The motion to approve failed (1-3) with Chairperson Kee and Commissioners Vessali and Williams voting in opposition. 7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix “A”, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 7.5 acres of land being situated in the Richard Carter Survey, Abstract No. 8, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, and being generally located at 801 Lincoln Avenue. Case #REZ2017-000023 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the November 9, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change) Senior Planner Helton presented this Rezoning to the Commission, and recommended approval stating that the rezoning must either be denied or approved with conditions so that it is consistent with the Eastgate Neighborhood Plan. Applicant, Crissy Hartl, Mitchell & Morgan Engineers, was available for questions from the Commission. Chairperson Kee asked if there was still a desire for commercial signage along Lincoln Avenue. Ms. Hartl indicated that the commercial signage is no longer needed at Lincoln Avenue. October 19, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 6 Chairperson Kee asked if single-family height protection would apply to all buildings within the development. Ms. Hartl stated that the single-family height protection would apply to the existing single-family homes along Lincoln Avenue to the east of the subject property. Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing. Van Ngo, 1203 B Munson Avenue, College Station asked for clarification on the signage that would be on Lincoln Avenue, expressing concerns for light pollution. Ms. Hartl stated that development would still want attached signage but the signage would not face Lincoln Avenue. Steven Miller, 906 Munson Avenue, College Station, expressed concerns with Vassar and Wellesley Court, through traffic, height restrictions. Mary Wells, 1106 Ashburn Avenue, College Station, spoke in opposition of the rezoning citing concerns for screening and traffic. Suzanne Droleskey, 1109 Ashburn Avenue, College Station, spoke in opposition of the rezoning citing concerns for buffering, orientation of front entrance of building and signage, and the 1:1 setback ratio. Dean Boyd, 1202 Ashburn Avenue, College Station spoke in opposition of the rezoning citing concerns for the Eastgate Neighborhood Plan. Brandon Spears, 904 Ashburn Avenue, College Station spoke in opposition of the rezoning citing concerns for light pollution, and neighborhood protection. Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing. Commissioner Vessali asked for the maximum building height for the zoning. Senior Planner Helton stated that the applicant is proposing 60-foot maximum height for the development. Commissioner Williamson motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning with the modification to eliminate the access to Lincoln Avenue through a public way, and eliminate the freestanding commercial signage along Lincoln Avenue. Commissioner Vessali seconded the motion. There was general discussion The motion passed (4-0). 8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. October 19, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 6 There was no discussion. 9. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 10:12 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Jane Kee, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services Planning & Zoning Commission October 19. 2017 Scale One lot on approximately 1.87 acres. Location Northeast corner of Wellborn Road and Navarro Drive. Applicant J4 Engineering Project Manager Lauren Hovde, Senior Planner lhovde@cstx.gov Project Overview This project is to plat one commercial lot containing an existing storage facility within the subject property. The lot meets the dimensional standards of the Suburban Commercial zoning in place. This plat includes a 0.046 acre right-of-way dedication along Wellborn Road. Preliminary Plan N/A Parkland Dedication N/A Impact Fees Subject to citywide impact fees—water, sanitary sewer, and roadway. Impact fees will be dependent upon timing of the building permit application date. Traffic Impact Analysis Not required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Application 3. Copy of Final Plat Development Plat for Equity Real Estate DVPL2017-000007 FP2017-000024 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Keith and Elizabeth Clements E-mail keith@equitybcs.com -----------------� Street Address PO Box 14 99 ----------------------------------� City Bryan State TX Zip Code _7_78_4_0 ____ _ Phone Number 979-693-3700 Fax Number ---------------- ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name J4 Engineering c/o Glenn Jones, PE-CFM Street Address PO Box 5192 E-mail gjones@j4engineering.com ----------------------------------� City Bryan State TX Zip Code 77805 --------------- Phone Number 979-739-0567 Fax Number ---------------- Tot a I Acreage 1.9 ---------------- R-0-W Acreage _o_. 0_4 _6 ___________ _ Current zoning of subject property SC -Suburban Commercial ------------------------------ FI o o d p I a in Ac reage _o _______________________ __________ _ Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? OYes 0No Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): 'nla Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. nla 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. nla Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 8 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. n1a 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance 'nla Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: 0 Streets 0 Sidewalks 336 Sanitary Sewer Lines 0 Water Lines 0 Channels 0 Storm Sewers 0 Bike Lanes I Paths Parklan d Dedication due prior to filing the Development Ptat: ACREAGE: 0 No. of acres to be dedicated + $ ____ development fee __ o_ No. of acres in floodplain _1_. 9_ No. of acres in detention 0 No. of acres in greenways --- OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: _n_la_ No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ __ _ = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board ---- NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPL/CATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 8 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. 7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre­ pour) and post construction. 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compbance. 9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shaU apply. 11. The �nfofmation and -ooodu�ons ooota� W. t� attacOOd ?\a"s aoo su� documents wm oomp\y �th the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit 13. t, THE OVl/NER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY TH ll STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR T DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PPLICAT N, , 0 THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND CU RAT Engineer Certifica 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin .. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of Coflege Station. Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE. Engineer Date Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 8 The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only Permits:* certify, as demonstrated ·in the attached drainage study, that the alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not: (i) increase the Base Flood elevation; (ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor (v) morease Base Flood ve\ocit-1es. beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. Engineer Date Initial D • If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate letter in lieu of certification. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill/ Grading Permits: B. I, , certify to the following: (i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm. Engineer Date Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments: C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this ���������������� permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. Engineer Date Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 8 Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate required). Residential Structures: D. �. , ce� that au J1ew coiistructio111 OJ any, substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction. Engineer I Surveyor Date Commercial Structures: E. I, ----------------, certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all utilities. ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation Engineer I Surveyor Date OR I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre­ pour) and post construction. Engineer I Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: Revised 5115 Page 6 of 8 D D [8:] [8:] Existing D Revised 9/14 DEVELOPMENT PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: (Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.) Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scaJe of 100' per inch or larger. Vidnity map which ·includes enough of surround·ing area to show general locat"1on of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow. Title Block with the following information: [8:] Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved [8:] through Brazos County 911.) (Property that has been previously platted must retain original subdivision name.) fgJ Date of preparatioo. [8:] Engineer's scale in feet. [8:] Total area shown on development plat. North Arrow. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger All app licable certification. [8:] Ownership and Dedication [8:] Surveyor and/or Engineer [8:] City Engineer [8:] Planning and Zoning Commission [8:] Brazos County Clerk D Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ET J Plats only) If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code. Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available data. Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data. The location and descnption wlth accurate dimensions, bearings or deflectfon angles and radji, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision). Proposed D [8:] D Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. Public and pnvate R.O.W. loca1Jons and widths. (Arr ex1stiog and proposed R.O.W.'s sufficfen1 to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. Page 7 of 8 Existing D � � D D Proposed D � � D D A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block. Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages (All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board prior to P&Z Commission consideration.) Building, structure or improvement or proposed modification of the external configuration of the building, structure, or improvement. Each easement and nghk>f-way. including alleys. within or abutting the bo undary of the­ surveyed property. Any part of the property intended to be dedicated to public use of for the use of purchasers or owners of lots fronting on or adjacent to the sidewalk, alley, square, park, or other part. � Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following: D Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subd1v1s1on. (may be combined with other utthttes). � Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) D Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) O Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design, channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage layout of the subdivision. D Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E. D letter of CompletlOll fOf publtc tnfrastmctUfe or guarar:ltee I surety 1n accordaooe with UDO Section 8.6. 0 Drainage Report. D Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans). � All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the development plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed. Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission conStderatJoo. D Are there impact fees associated with this development? D Yes �No Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit D Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? �Yes D No If yes, TxOOT permt must be submitted aioog with the coostructioo documents. NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected development ,piat to be submitted m digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Nobce of Intent (NOi} must be submnted prior to issuance of a development permit. Revised 5/15 Print Form Page 8 of 8 DEVELOPMENT PLAT Engineer: PO Box 5192 Bryan, TX 77805 979-739-0567 TBPE F-9951 Equity Real Estate Lot 1 ~ 1.873 Acres Crawford Burnett, Tract 9.1 College Station, Brazos County, Texas November 2017 Owner: Keith & Elizabeth ClementsPO Box 1499Bryan, TX 77806-1499 Surveyor: Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 979-268-3195 ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” N.T.S. Planning & Zoning Commission November 16, 2017 Scale 2 phases consisting of 114 residential lots and 6 common areas on approximately 35.5 acres Location 3451 Barron Cut-Off Road, generally located south of Barron Cut-Off Applicant Trent Thomas, Roundtree Development, Ltd. Project Manager Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner rlazo@cstx.gov Project Overview Previously approved in September 2016, this revised Preliminary Plan is reconfiguring a portion of Phase 1 so that the Final Plat for Phase 2 will be compliant with the Preliminary Plan. Parkland Dedication Parkland dedication of $1,261 per dwelling unit will be required at time of Final Plat. Traffic Impact Analysis Not Required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity Map & Aerial 2. Application 3. Copy of Preliminary Plan Preliminary Plan for Brewster Pointe PP2017-0000020 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.:___________ DATE SUBMITTED:_________ TIME: STAFF:__________________ PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the project): Name Trent Thomas E-mail thomastrent6l4©grnail.com Street Address 1110 12th Man Circle City College Station State TX Phone Number 9792046305 Fax Number PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Rountree Development, LTD E-mail thomastrent6 14©gmail.corn Street Address 1110 12th Man Circle City College Station Phone Number 979-6907117 State TX Fax Number Zip Code 77845 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER’S INFORMATION: Name Joe Schultz,P.E. Street Address 911 Southwest Parkway East City College Station State ~ Phone Number 9797643900 Zip Code 77845 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas AóM Universi~ MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~$990 Preliminary Plan Application Fee. ~$250 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Copy of plan.A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval. ~Title report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90) days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens, encumbrances,etc. ~Impact study (if oversized participation is requested). ~The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference N/A NAME OF PROJECT Brewster Pointe Subdivision Phase 2 ADDRESS 3387 Barron Cut Off Road SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: Barron Cut Off Road between WS.Phillips Parkway and FM 2154.Property extends to Castlegate II Subdivision Zip Code 77845 E-mail /oe©schultzeng.com Fax Number 9797643910 Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 6 Total Acreage 35.455 Total No.of Lots 114 R-O-W Acreage 8.371 Number of Lots By Zoning District 114 I GS I I Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 0.174 /GS ______ ______ ______/______ ____________ Floodplain Acreage N/A NOTE:Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be considered complete. Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land?N/A Are you proposing to fl develop the park ~dedicate the development fee?(Check one) This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance.Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? ~Yes flNo If yes,provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name:Brewster Pointe Subdivision City Project Number (if known):PP2016-000015 Date!Timeframe when submitted:07/15/2016 Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 6 Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1.fl An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2.fl The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City’s comprehensive Plan; 3.fl A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12)months; 4.fl Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate I rural context; 5.fl When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle,Pedestrian,and Greenways Master Plan; Revised 5/15 Page 3of6 6.fl The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or 7.fl The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification,in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf.LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. Signature ar~title ation of condition identified above: /Date 2~/7 Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 6 PRELIMINARY PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Drawn on 24”x 36”sheet to scale of 100’per inch or larger.Include the words “PRELIMINARY PLAN - NOT FOR RECORD”in letters 1/2”high.If more than I sheet,an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits.No scale required but include north arrow. ~Title Block with the following information: Name and address of subdivider,recorded owner,engineer and surveyor. ~Proposed name of subdivision (subdivision name &street names will be approved through Brazos County 911). ~Date of preparation (including the date the plat was submitted and the dates of any revisions on the plat). ~Engineer’s scale in feet. ~Total area intended to be developed. North Arrow. Location of current city limit lines and current zoning district boundary.The appropriate zoning district(s) must be in place for the proposed land uses before the application for a subdivision. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.Boundary must include all of parent tract. ~Descriptions by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within accepted land survey standards.(Labeled on boundary lines,not separate metes and bounds description.) ~Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control point,to which ,later,all dimensions, angles, bearings,block numbers,and similar data shall be referred.The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the survey or tract,or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. ~Name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous parcels of unsubdivided land,and an indication whether or not contiguous properties are platted. ~Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and Floodway,if applicable, according to the most recent available data. Topographic information,including contours at two foot (2 ft.)intervals,wooded areas,and flowline elevation of streams. ~Proposed land uses (in compliance with existing zoning district). ~The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle,degree of curvature,tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision,as well as,those within the subdivision). Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 6 Existing Proposed Streets.Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac,stubbed out streets must end into a temp. turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. ~Public and private ROW.locations and widths.(All existing and proposed R.Q.W.’s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. Alleys. Well site locations. ~Pipelines.If carrying flammable gas or fuel,also show size of line,design pressure and product transported through the line. ~Utility services (water &sanitary sewer).All existing and proposed utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas. ~Easements. ~Drainage structures and improvements including underground storm sewer and all overland systems (flow line of existing watercourses)and showing where these will discharge. Proposed channel cross sections,if any. A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially). Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages.All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. D Greenways dedication. Public areas. Other public improvements,including but not limited to parks,schools and other public facilities. Proposed phasing.Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements and infrastructure costs shown to be distributed evenly throughout the subdivision.Phases must be final platted in sequential order as shown or defined on the preliminary plan. Are there impact fees associated with this development?fl Yes ~No Revised 5/15 Page 6 of 6 LEGEND 12 15 13 14 16 1 2 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 9 10 13 141516171819202122 5 4 3 12 8 11 7 12 11 2324 12 26 25 610 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 3 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 39 BLOCK 39 BLOCK 46 YANWORTH LANE PORTLAND AVENUEBARRON CUT-OFF ROADSPRING BREEZE WAYBREWSTER DRIVEESKEW DRIVE ESKEW DRIVE BROWNWAY DRIVE BREWSTER DRIVEESKEW DRIVE PORTLAND AVENUEESKEW DRIVE BARRON CUT-OFF ROAD22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 33 323130292827262524 23 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 282930313233343536373839 COMMON AREA 5 COMMON AREA 6 COMMON AREA 1 AND PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PHASE 2 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 PHASE 1 BLOCK 3 BLOCK 5SPRING BREEZE WAYBROWNWAY COURT ARMAN COURT COMMON AREA 1 AND PRIVATE DRAINGE EASEMENT FOR STORMWATER DETENTION COMMON AREA 2 AND PRIVATE DRAINGE EASEMENT FOR STORMWATER DETENTION COMMON AREA 4 AND PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR STORMWATER DETENTION TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN BREWSTER POINTE SUBDIVISION 35.455 ACRES - 114 LOTS ROBERT STEVENSON LEAGUE, A-54 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE: 1" = 80' OCTOBER, 2017 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Rountree Development, Ltd 1110 12th Man Circle College Station, TX 77845 (979) 690-7117 PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD PHASE 1: 19.950 ACRES - 67 LOTS (0.194 ACRE ROW DEDICATION FOR BARRON CUT-OFF ROAD) (1.733 ACRE COMMON AREA 1) (0.905 ACRE COMMON AREA 2) (0.115 ACRE COMMON AREA 3) PHASE 2: 15.505 ACRES - 47 LOTS ( 0.214 ACRE ROW DEDICATION FOR BARRON CUT-OFF ROAD) ( 0.380 ACRE COMMON AREA 4) (1.209 ACRE COMMON AREA 5) (2.938 ACRE COMMON AREA 6) VICINITY MAP W I L L I A M D . F I T C H P K W Y BREWSTER BARRON CUT OFF RDNOT TO SCALEFM 2154TRADEWIND DRIVE 55' ROW - 32' PAVEMENT LEGEND 12 15 13 14 16 1 2 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 9 10 13 141516171819202122 5 4 3 12 8 11 7 12 11 2324 12 26 25 610 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 3 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 39 BLOCK 39 BLOCK 46 YANWORTH LANE PORTLAND AVENUEBARRON CUT-OFF ROADSPRING BREEZE WAYBREWSTER DRIVEESKEW DRIVE ESKEW DRIVE BROWNWAY DRIVE BREWSTER DRIVEESKEW DRIVE PORTLAND AVENUEESKEW DRIVE BARRON CUT-OFF ROAD22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 33 323130292827262524 23 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 282930313233343536373839 COMMON AREA 5 COMMON AREA 6 COMMON AREA 1 AND PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PHASE 2 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 PHASE 1 BLOCK 3 BLOCK 5SPRING BREEZE WAYBROWNWAY COURT ARMAN COURT COMMON AREA 1 AND PRIVATE DRAINGE EASEMENT FOR STORMWATER DETENTION COMMON AREA 2 AND PRIVATE DRAINGE EASEMENT FOR STORMWATER DETENTION COMMON AREA 4 AND PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR STORMWATER DETENTION TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN BREWSTER POINTE SUBDIVISION 35.455 ACRES - 114 LOTS ROBERT STEVENSON LEAGUE, A-54 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE: 1" = 80' OCTOBER, 2017 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Rountree Development, Ltd 1110 12th Man Circle College Station, TX 77845 (979) 690-7117 PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD PHASE 1: 19.950 ACRES - 67 LOTS (0.194 ACRE ROW DEDICATION FOR BARRON CUT-OFF ROAD) (1.733 ACRE COMMON AREA 1) (0.905 ACRE COMMON AREA 2) (0.115 ACRE COMMON AREA 3) PHASE 2: 15.505 ACRES - 47 LOTS ( 0.214 ACRE ROW DEDICATION FOR BARRON CUT-OFF ROAD) ( 0.380 ACRE COMMON AREA 4) (1.209 ACRE COMMON AREA 5) (2.938 ACRE COMMON AREA 6) VICINITY MAP W I L L I A M D . F I T C H P K W Y BREWSTER BARRON CUT OFF RDNOT TO SCALEFM 2154TRADEWIND DRIVE 55' ROW - 32' PAVEMENT Planning & Zoning Commission November 16, 2017 Scale 2.209 acres right-of-way dedication and 0.227 acres Parkland Dedication Location North of Harvey Road and west of FM 158 Applicant Rabon Metcalf, RME Consulting Engineers Project Manager Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner rlazo@cstx.gov Project Overview The proposed Final Plat is the first phase towards reconfiguring one unplatted tract into a townhouse development. This phase consists of right-of-way dedication for a minor collector and approximately 0.23 acres of Parkland Dedication that will be added to the adjacent 8.81 acres of parkland previously dedicated in the first phase. Preliminary Plan Approved May 2017 Parkland Dedication This property is vested to a 2007 Master Plan, which required Parkland Dedication fees of $358 per residential lot at the filing of each Final Plat phase. 8.8 acres of land were dedicated for the first phase of Summit Crossing, which is credited towards the development’s land dedication requirement. Impact Fees Subject to citywide impact fees—water, sanitary sewer, and roadway. Impact fees will be dependent upon timing of the building permit application date. Traffic Impact Analysis Not Required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Aerial 2. Application 3. Copy of Final Plat Final Plat For Summit Crossing Phase 3A FP2016-000042 (Check one) City Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 9 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: STAFF: City Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 9 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple City This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): 6. D The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or 7. D The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission. Requested Oversize Participation _______________________________ _ Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: 1577 Streets 3154 Sidewalks 1600 Sanitary Sewer Lines 1560 Water Lines Channels 880 Storm Sewers Bike Lanes I Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: ___ No. of acres to be dedicated + $ ____ development fee ___ No. of acres in floodplain ___ No. of acres in detention No. of acres in greenways --- OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ = $ --- --------- (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board ---- NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. Signature Date Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 9 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. 7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre­ pour) and post construction. 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in - accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12. Release of plans to {name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURAT . , 1-1.,,/IP Property 0 Date Engineer Certification: 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMI APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCU Date Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 9 Revised 5/15 Page 6 of 9 The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Engineer Date Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only Permits:* DateEngineer (ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor (v) increase Base Flood velocities. beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate letter in lieu of certification. Initial Engineer / Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: Page 7 of 9Revised 5/15 utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation DateEngineer / Surveyor Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour) and post construction. Date NOTE: 1.We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOI) must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit. Alleys. Easements. A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially). Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. Planning & Zoning Commission November 16, 2017 Scale 60 single-family lots, 1.715 acres right-of-way dedication, and 0.026 acres Parkland Dedication on approximately 7.3 acres Location North of Harvey Road and west of FM 158 Applicant Rabon Metcalf, RME Consulting Engineers Project Manager Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner rlazo@cstx.gov Project Overview The proposed Final Plat reconfigures one unplatted tract into 60 residential lots for Phase 3B of the existing townhouse development, Summit Crossing. This phase includes right-of-way dedication, and approximately .026 acres of Parkland Dedication that will be added to the adjacent 8.8 acres of parkland previously dedicated in the first phase. Preliminary Plan Approved May 2017 Parkland Dedication This property is vested to a 2007 Master Plan, which required Parkland Dedication fees of $358 per residential lot at the filing of each Final Plat phase. 8.8 acres of land were dedicated for the first phase of Summit Crossing, which is credited towards this phase’s land dedication requirement. This phase will pay $21,480 in Parkland Dedication. Impact Fees Subject to citywide impact fees—water, sanitary sewer, and roadway. Impact fees will be dependent upon timing of the building permit application date. Traffic Impact Analysis Not Required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity Map & Aerial 2. Application 3. Copy of Final Plat Final Plat for Summit Crossing Phase 3B FP2016-000043 (Check one) City Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 9 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: STAFF: City Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 9 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple City This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): 6. D The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or 7. D The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission. Requested Oversize Participation _______________________________ _ Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: 1238 Streets 1238 Sidewalks 1100 Sanitary Sewer Lines 1470 Water Lines Channels 345 Storm Sewers Bike Lanes I Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: No. of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee ------- ___ No. of acres in floodplain No. of acres in detention --- ___ No. of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ = $ ------------ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board ---- NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPL/CATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. Date Revised 5/15 Page4 of 9 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. 7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre­ pour) and post construction. 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in - accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12. Release of plans to {name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURAT . , 1-1.,,/IP Property 0 Date Engineer Certification: 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMI APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCU Date Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 9 Revised 5/15 Page 6 of 9 The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Engineer Date Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only Permits:* DateEngineer (ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor (v) increase Base Flood velocities. beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate letter in lieu of certification. Initial Engineer / Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: Page 7 of 9Revised 5/15 utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation DateEngineer / Surveyor Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour) and post construction. Date NOTE: 1.We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOI) must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit. Alleys. Easements. A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially). Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. Planning & Zoning Commission November 16, 2017 Scale 7 residential lots on approximately 13 acres Location 11071 Favor Road; north intersection of N. Dowling Road and Favor Road. Applicant Schultz Engineering, LLC Project Manager Jenifer Paz, AICP, Principal Planner jpaz@cstx.gov Project Overview The property is located in the City’s ETJ, within 100 feet from the city limit boundary. The preliminary plan is for the future subdivision of approximately 13 acres along Favor Road into 7 residential lots. Future lots within the subdivision will range in size, from a minimum 1 acre to 4.4 acres. White Creek Tributary bisects the northern most portion of the property, future Lot 6. Right-of-Way dedication is proposed on both side of Favor Road, which will be dedicated with the filing of the Final Plat. Parkland Dedication Community Parkland Dedication fees totaling $625 per lot will be required at the filing of Final Plat. Traffic Impact Analysis TIA is not required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity Map & Aerial 2. Application 3. Copy of Preliminary Plan Preliminary Plan for Reese Cove Subdivision PP2017-000017 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.:________________ DATE SUBMITTED:______________ TIME: STAFF: Date of Optional Preapplication Conference n/a NAME OF PROJECT Reese Cove Subdivision ADDRESS 11071 Favor Road SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: Along Favor Road APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Craig A lien Breedlove E-mail cbreed28@suddenhinkmail.corn Street Address 16659 Windy Ryon Road City College Station Phone Number ~ State DC Fax Number Zip Code 77845 PROPERTY OWNER’S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Craig Allen Breediove E-mail cbreed28@suddenlinkrnail.corn Street Address 16659 Windy Ryon Road City College Station Phone Number 9797777953 State 7X Fax Number Zip Code 77845 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER’S INFORMATION: Name Joe Schultz P.E.E-mail eng~schuItzeng.corn Street Address 911 Southwest Parkway E. City College Station Phone Number 979-764-3900 State 7X Zip Code 77845 Fax Number 979-764-3910 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texae A&M Universi~ MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~$990 Preliminary Plan Application Fee. ~$250 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Copy of plan.A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval. ~Title report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90)days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens, encumbrances,etc. ~Impact study (if oversized participation is requested). E~The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 6 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DATE SUBMITTED:___________ TIME: CITY OF COUEGE STATION Home ofTexaeA&M Uoiversity~STAFF: PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~$990 Preliminary Plan Application Fee. ~$250 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Copy of plan.A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval. ~Title report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90)days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens, encumbrances,etc. ~Impact study (if oversized participation is requested). D The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference _________________________________________________________________ NAME OF PROJECT ADDRESS SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Page Thornton E-mail page©aggielandtitle.corn Street Address 448 Wrn.D Fitch Parkway City College Station State ~Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 9797771853 Fax Number _______________________________ PROPERTY OWNER’S INFORMATION (Au owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Page Thornton E-mail page©aggielandtitle.corn Street Address 448 Wm.D Fitch Parkway City College Station State ~Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 9797771853 Fax Number _______________________________ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER’S INFORMATION: Name ______________________________________E-mail _______________________________________ Street Address City ______________________________________State ___________________Zip Code ________________ Phone Number ______________________________________Fax Number _________________________________ Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 6 Total Acreage 12.965 Total No.of Lots 7 R-O-W Acreage 1.152 Number of Lots By Zoning District 7 I RS I I Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 1.687 ,,RS ______/____________ ______ Floodplain Acreage ~ NOTE:Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be considered complete. Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land?__________________________________________ Are you proposing to El develop the park ~dedicate the development fee? (Check one) This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance.Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? ~Yes ~No If yes,provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: City Project Number (if known): Date I Timeframe when submitted: Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 6 Regarding the waiver request,explain how: 1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. 3. 4.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1.~An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2.~The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative,or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City’s comprehensive Plan; 3.~A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk.Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12)months; 4.~J Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate ~‘ rural context; 5.fl When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle,Pedestrian,and Greenways Master Plan; The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or injurious to other property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. Revised 5/15 Page 3 of6 6.fl The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or 7.fl The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway / Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification,in the Citys Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE:A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,correct,and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this appilca (ion must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the appilcation or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be,accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report am also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. t~7 \~./Sid~1ure and title —Date ~LPcl &2 ~ Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 6 6.~The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or 7.~The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification,in the Citys Comprehensive Plan. NOTE:A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf.LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. ~4/&I-7 Date Detailed i )lanation of condition identified above: ~re and title Revised 5115 Page 4 of 6 PRELIMINARY PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Drawn on 24”x 36”sheet to scale of 100’per inch or larger.Include the words ‘PRELIMINARY PLAN - NOT FOR RECORD’in letters 1/2’high.If more than 1 sheet,an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits.No scale required but include north arrow. ~Title Block with the following information: Name and address of subdivider,recorded owner,engineer and surveyor. ~Proposed name of subdivision (subdivision name &street names will be approved through Brazos County 911). ~Date of preparation (including the date the plat was submitted and the dates of any revisions on the plat). ~Engineer’s scale in feet. ~Total area intended to be developed. North Arrow. ~Location of current city limit lines and current zoning district boundary.The appropriate zoning district(s) must be in place for the proposed land uses before the application for a subdivision. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.Boundary must include all of parent tract. ~Descriptions by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within accepted land survey standards. (Labeled on boundary lines,not separate metes and bounds description.) ~Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control point,to which ,later,all dimensions, angles, bearings, block numbers,and similar data shall be referred.The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the survey or tract,or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. ~Name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous parcels of unsubdivided land, and an indication whether or not contiguous properties are platted. ~Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and Floodway,if applicable,according to the most recent available data. Topographic information, including contours at two foot (2 ft.)intervals,wooded areas,and flowline elevation of streams. ~Proposed land uses (in compliance with existing zoning district). ~The location and description with accurate dimensions,bearings or deflection angles and radii,area, center angle, degree of curvature,tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision,as well as,those within the subdivision). Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 6 Existing Proposed Streets.Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp.turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. ~1 Public and private ROW.locations and widths.(All existing and proposed ROWs sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) ~Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. El Alleys. El Well site locations. El Pipelines.If carrying flammable gas or fuel,also show size of line,design pressure and product transported through the line. ~Utility services (water &sanitary sewer).All existing and proposed utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas. ~Easements. ~Drainage structures and improvements including underground storm sewer and all overland systems (flow line of existing watercourses)and showing where these will discharge. Proposed channel cross sections,if any. ~A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially). Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages.All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. El El Greenways dedication. Public areas. El Other public improvements,including but not limited to parks,schools and other public facilities. El Proposed phasing.Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements and infrastructure costs shown to be distributed evenly throughout the subdivision. Phases must be final platted in sequential order as shown or defined on the preliminary plan. El Are there impact fees associated with this development?El Yes ~No Revised 5/15 I Page 6 of 6 S T I L LWA T E R ROAD FAVOR ROAD NORTH DOWLING ROADSTORMWATER DETENTION AREA FH FH FH LOT 6 1.730 AC. BLOCK 1 LOT 5 1.058 AC. LOT 4 1.038AC. LOT 3 1.034 AC. 1.101 AC. LOT 1 1.448 AC. BLOCK 1 LOT 2 FH FH 4.403 AC. BLOCK 2 STORMWATER DETENTION AREA LOT 1 STORMWATER DETENTION AREA FAVOR ROADLEGEND FH TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN REESE COVE SUBDIVISION 12.965 ACRES - 7 LOTS BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-6 - 7.409 ACRES BLOCK 2, LOT 1 - 4.403 ACRES ROW DEDICATION - 1.152 ACRES WILLIAM DUNN LEAGUE, A-108 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE: 1" = 60' OCTOBER, 2017 OWNERS/DEVELOPERS: Craig Allen Breedlove 16659 Windy Ryon Road College Station, TX 77845 Page Thornton 448 Wm. D Fitch Parkway College Station, TX 77845 PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORDVICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE FAVOR R O A D WA L N U T R O A DN. DOWLING ROAD H I C K O R Y R O A D S T I L LW A T E R R O AD N. DOWLING ROAD VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Planning & Zoning Commission October 19. 2017 Scale 18 lots on approximately 8.95 acres. Location Southwest corner of Holleman Drive South and Kenyon Drive. Applicant KM Custom Homes Project Manager Lauren Hovde, Senior Planner lhovde@cstx.gov Project Overview Multi-family component in the continuation of the existing University Heights Subdivision, consisting of 18 multi- family lots and three common areas. Preliminary Plan Approved February 2016 Parkland Dedication $687 / bedroom, to be collected with building permits. Impact Fees Subject to citywide impact fees—water, sanitary sewer, and roadway. Impact fees will be dependent upon timing of the building permit application date. Traffic Impact Analysis Not required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Application 3. Copy of Final Plat Final Plat for University Heights Phase 4 FP2016-000028 FP2017-000024 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.:_________________ DATE SUBMITTED:________________ TIME: STAFF: Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference N/A NAME OF PROJECT University Heights Subdivision -Phase 4 ADDRESS Holleman Drive South SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT: South-East of University Heights Phases 1,2,&3 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Kenny Melesky E-mail kenny@kmcustomhomes.com Street Address P0 505 City Mihican Phone Number 9795872275 State TX Fax Number 9797036800 Zip Code 77666 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas Ad~M Univeoity” (Check one)~Minor ($700) Amending ($700) Is this plat in the ETJ?~Yes ~No Final ($932) D Vacating ($932) Is this plat Commercial ~or Residential ~ ~Replat ($932) MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~$700-$932 Final PIat Application Fee (see above). ~$233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). ~$600 (minimum)Development Permit Application /Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee.Fee is 1%of acceptable Engineer’s Estimate for public infrastructure,$600 minimum (if fee is>$600,the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. Copy of plat.(A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.) Grading,drainage,and erosion control plan with supporting drainage report. Public infrastructure plan and supporting documents (if applicable). Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). Title report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90)days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens, encumbrances,etc. ~The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. NOTE:A paid tax certificates from City of College Station,Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.will be due at the time of the mylar submittal prior to filing the plat. Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 9 PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION (All owners must be identified.Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name KGM Rentals E-mail kenny@kmcustomhomes.com Street Address P.O.Box 505 City Millican State ~Zip Code 77866 Phone Number 979-587-2275 Fax Number 979-703-6800 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER’S INFORMATION: Name Schultz Engineering,LLC -Joe Schultz E-mail /oe~schultzeng.com Street Address 911 Southwest Pkwy E. City College Station State ~Zip Code 77840 Phone Number (979)764-3900 Fax Number (979)764-3910 Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property?~Yes ~No Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property?If so,please provide the Volume 10420 and Page No.246 Total Acreage 8.959 Total No.of Lots 18 R-O-W Acreage 0.787 Existing Use Vacant Proposed Use Townhome and Multi-family Number of Lots By Zoning District R-4 /18 // Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: R-4 /0.454 ______/______ ______/______/ Floodplain Acreage N/A Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels)on the property?fl Yes ~No This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance.Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? ~Yes flNo If yes,provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name:University Heights Subdivision (PP) City Project Number (if known):11 -00500064 Date /Timeframe when submitted:03/30/11 Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 9 A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable): Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Regarding the waiver request,explain how: 1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision reaulations will deorive the aoDlicant of the reasonable use of his land. 4.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. 1.fl An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2.El The presence of unique or unusual topographic,vegetative,or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City’s comprehensive Plan; 3.El A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk.Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12)months; 4.El Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate / rural context; 5.fl When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle,Pedestrian,and Greenways Master Plan; 2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 9 6.fl The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or 7.fl The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification,in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE:A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission. Requested Oversize Participation_None Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: Proposed Public: ACREAGE:1,059 Streets o~,n _______No.of acres to be dedicated +$__________development fee °‘~Sidewalks No.of acres in floodplain Sanitary Sewer Lines No.of acres in detention584_Water Lines No.of acres in greenways _______Channels OR667Storm Sewers FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: Bike Lanes /Paths No.of SF Dwelling Units X $=$__________________ (date)Approved by Parks &Recreation Advisory Board NOTE:DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,correct,and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf.LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. Signature and title Date Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 9 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1.No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2.The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3.If revoked,all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4.Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5.The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6.Other permits may be required to fulfill local,state,and federal requirements.Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOl and SWPPP. 7.If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre pour)and post construction. 8.Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9.If,stormwater mitigation is required,including detention ponds proposed as part of this project,it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10.In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station,measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction,erosion,and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities.All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project.All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11.The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications,and Standard Details.All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12.Release of plans to __________________________________(name or firm)is authorized for bidding purposes only.I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13.I,THE OWNER,AGREETOAND CERTIFYTHATALLSTATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPM NT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE, AND ACI~LTE./J Prope y Owner(s)Date Engineer Certification: 1.The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds,proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2.I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local,State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES:i.e.,projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3.The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines.All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4.I,THE ENGINEER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOP’T APPLICATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE,AND ACCURATE. O1/zL1I(’, Date Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 9 The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats,Construction Plans,Fill I Grading Permits,and Clearing Only Permits:* A.I,______________________________________ certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study,that the alterations or development covered by this permit,shall not: (i)increase the Base Flood elevation: (ii)create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area: (iii)decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv)reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances,Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor (v)increase Base Flood velocities. beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. Engineer Date Initial *If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted,provide written justification under separate _______letter in lieu of certification. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats,Construction Plans, and Fill I Grading Permits: B.I,______________________________________,certify to the following: (i)that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm. Engineer Date Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments: C.I,_____________________________________, certify that the construction,improvement,or fill covered by this permit shall not increase the base flood elevation.I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. Engineer Date Revised 5/15 Page 6 of 9 Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate req u i red). Residential Structures: D.I,_______________________________________,certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor,including all utilities,ductwork and any basement,at an elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation.Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour)and post construction. Engineer!Surveyor Date Commercial Structures: E.I,______________________________________,certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any commercial,industrial,or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor,including all utilities,ductwork and basements,elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation Engineer!Surveyor Date OR certify that the structure with its attendant utility,ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities,ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all areas below the Base Flood Elevation,and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre pour)and post construction. Engineer!Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval:___________________________________________________________________ Revised 5/15 Page 7 of 9 Drawn on 24”x 36’sheet to scale of 100 per inch. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits.No scale required but include north arrow. Title Block with the following information: Name and address of subdivider,recorded owner, planner,engineer and surveyor. Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name &street names will be approved through Brazos County 911.) Date of preparation. Engineer’s scale in feet. ~Total area intended to be developed. North Arrow. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. If more than I sheet,an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat. ~Ownership and Dedication ~Surveyor and/or Engineer ~City Engineer (and City Planner,if a minor plat) ~Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat) ~Brazos County Clerk ~Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only) If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements,submit a survey showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created. of the subject property If using private septic systems,add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner’s Court of Brazos County,pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code. Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway,if applicable, according to the most recent available data. Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol)and clearly tied to basic survey data. Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2). The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii,area,center angle,degree of curvature,tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision,as well as,those within the subdivision). Existing Proposed E~1 Streets.Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. E~1 Public and private ROW.locations and widths.(All existing and proposed R.O.W.’s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: (Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.) Revised 5/15 Page 8 of 9 Existing Proposed ~Alleys. Easements. A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially). Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages.All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. ~Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24”x 36”sheets and properly sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following: ~Street,alley and sidewalk plans,profiles and sections.One sheet must show the overall street,alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision.(may be combined with other utilities). Sewer Design Report. ~j Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades.One sheet must show the overall sewer layout of the subdivision.(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report. Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves,etc.with plan and profile lines showing depth and grades.One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) Storm drainage system plan with contours,street profile, inlets,storm sewer and drainage channels,with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas,and runoff based on 5,10,25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity.Detailed drainage structure design, channel lining design &detention if used.One sheet must show the overall drainage layout of the subdivision. ~Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E. ~Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee /surety in accordance with UDO Section 8.6. ~Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary. Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans). All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed. Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. ~Are there impact fees associated with this development?D Yes E~1 No Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit. ~Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way?D Yes ~No If yes,TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents. NOTE:1.We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2.If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOI)must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit. L ~Form Revised 5/15 Page 9 of 9 Planning & Zoning Commission November 16, 2017 Scale 100 townhouse lots and 7 common areas on approximately 14.6 acres. Location 4050 Holleman Drive South Applicant Schultz Engineering, LLC. Project Manager Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner rlazo@cstx.gov Project Overview The proposed Final Plat reconfigures a portion of one unplatted tract into 100 townhouse lots with 7 common areas on 14.6 acres for Phase 1 of a townhouse development. Preliminary Plan Approved March 2017 with a discretionary item regarding payment into the sidewalk fund Parkland Dedication Parkland Dedication fees of $1,261 per residential lot will be required at the filing of each Final Plat. This phase will pay $118,534 in Parkland Dedication. Impact Fees Subject to citywide impact fees—water, sanitary sewer, and roadway. Impact fees will be dependent upon timing of the building permit application date. Traffic Impact Analysis Not Required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes – This phase will pay $16,830 in Sidewalk Fee-in-Lieu as approved with the Preliminary Plan. Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity Map & Aerial 2. Application 3. Copy of Final Plat Final Plat for Pershing Pointe Villas Subdivision Phase I FP2017-000004 Name of Project:PERSHING POINTE VILLAS PH1 Address:4050 HOLLEMAN DR S Legal Description:A000701, CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL), TRACT 46.3, 23.707 ACRES Applicant:: Property Owner:DWS DEVELOPMENT INC SCHULTZ ENGINEERING LLC Total Acreage:14.638 Requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): N/A Regarding the waiver request, explain how: There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. N/A Total No. of Lots:100 ROW Acreage:2.964 Existing Use:vacant Floodplain Acreage:N/A Special Flood Hazard Area?No - there is no Special Flood Hazard Area on the property FINAL PLAT APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantional property right of the applicant. N/A The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, orinjurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. N/A Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): N/A Requested Oversize Participation: Detailed explanation of condition identified above: #Error Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat, if applicable: No. of acres to be dedicated: No. of acres in detention: N/ANo. of acres in floodplain: N/A N/A No. of acres in greenways:N/A Parkland Development Fee:N/A Parks & Recreation Advisory Board approval date: N/A Page 2 of 2 COMMONAREA 613 12 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 BLOCK 4 13 1 2 1 2 12 13 1 2 MOMMA BEAR DRIVE 12HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTHHOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTHTOWERS PARKWAYDEA C O N D R I V E W E S T DEACON DRIVE WEST TOWERS PARKWAYDEACON DRIVE WEST LOT 1A-R LOT 1B HAYES LANE PAPA BEAR DRIVE PAPA BEAR DRIVE PAPA BEAR DRIVE HAYES LANE HA Y E S L A N E HAYES LANEPAPA BEAR DRIVEPAPA BEAR DRIVEREGIMENT WAY1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 COMMON AREA 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 19181716151413121110987COMMON AREA 36521 COMMON AREA 2 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 22 COMMON AREA 4COM M O N A R E A 1 COMMON AREA 5 & PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 6 BLOCK 6 HOLLEMAN DR S VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE DEACON W DRWE L L B O R N R D ROCK PRAIRIE RD WDEACON W DR T OW E R S P KW Y TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: FINAL PLAT PERSHING POINTE VILLAS SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 14.638 ACRES CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, A-7 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 100 LOTS BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-18 BLOCK 4, LOTS 1-30 BLOCK 5, LOTS 1-33 BLOCK 6, LOTS 1-19 COMMON AREAS 1 - 7 SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE 1'' = 50' SEPTEMBER, 2017 OWNER/DEVELOPER: DWS Development Inc. P.O. Box 4508 Bryan, TX 77805 (979) 779-7209 LEGEND LEGEND ’ – – ROW DEDICATION 175 SQ. FT. ROW DEDICATION 312 SQ. FT. Planning & Zoning Commission November 16, 2017 Scale 11 townhouse lots and 1 common area on approximately 1.7 acres Location 200 Tarrow Street, generally located at the intersection of Tarrow Street and Autumn Circle Applicant Daniel Beamon, Johnson & Pace Inc. Project Manager Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner rlazo@cstx.gov Project Overview The proposed Final Plat reconfigures one lot into 11 lots and 1 common area for a townhouse development and dedicates approximately 0.25 acres for the existing Tarrow Street right-of-way. There is one discretionary item for payment of $9,750 into the Sidewalk Fund in lieu of constructing 325 feet of sidewalk along Tarrow Street. Preliminary Plan N/A Parkland Dedication Parkland dedication of $1,261 per dwelling unit will be required at time of filing. This development will be required to pay $13,871 in Parkland Dedication. Impact Fees Subject to citywide impact fees—water, sanitary sewer, and roadway. Impact fees will be dependent upon timing of the building permit application date. Traffic Impact Analysis Not Required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes with the exception of UDO Section 12-8.3, K.5.b ‘Fee in Lieu of Construction’ Staff Recommendation Approval of discretionary item and final plat Supporting Materials 1. Discretionary item request 2. Vicinity Map & Aerial 3. Application 4. Copy of Final Plat Final Plat For Tarrow Townhomes FP2017-000014 City of College Station Subdivision Regulations Planning & Zoning Discretionary Item – Sidewalk Fee in Lieu of Construction REQUEST A public sidewalk is required along Tarrow Street. The applicant would like to pay fee in lieu of construction for the portion between the proposed access easement (dark gray) and the northern boundary line (on the right), which is 325 linear feet. CRITERIA UDO Section 12-8.3.K.5.b ‘Fee in Lieu of Construction’ allows the Planning and Zoning Commission to authorize the payment of a fee in lieu of constructing a required sidewalk or multi-use path when it determines one or more of the following conditions exist: (a) An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided; (b) The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements contained herein is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of this UDO or the City's Comprehensive Plan; (c) A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months; (d) Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an Estate/Rural context; (e) When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, Greenways Master Plan; (f) The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Section 12-8.3.H.2 Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions of this UDO; or (g) The proposed development contains frontage on a freeway/ expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan-Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Currently this portion of the property is in FEMA regulated 100-year floodplain and is part of a significant conveyance path for Burton Creek. The applicant is therefore requesting to pay a fee in the amount of $9,750 in lieu of construction under criteria “b” above, citing that the presence of floodplain and the slope for the required deceleration lane on Tarrow would make constructing a sidewalk extremely difficult. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the discretionary item for the UDO Section 8.3.K.5.b Fee in Lieu of Construction of Sidewalks. $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 1.5% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. $750-$990 Final Plat Application Fee (see above). $250 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens, encumbrances, etc. Copy of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.) Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) Minor Amending Final Vacating Replat Is this plat in the ETJ? MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: NOTE: A paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. will be due at the time of the mylar submittal prior to filing the plat. Is this plat Commercial Yes No ($750)($750)($990)($990)($990) The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name E-mail Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 9 Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT: ADDRESS NAME OF PROJECT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: STAFF: Public infrastructure plan and supporting documents (if applicable). Grading, drainage, and erosion control plan with supporting drainage report. or Residential Daniel Beamon danielb@johnsonpace.com 111 University Drive East College Station TX 77840 979-485-2844 200 Tarrow Street Tarrow Townhomes TRIAL MODE − a valid license will remove this message. See the keywords property of this PDF for more information. ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page No. Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? Total Acreage Total No. of Lots R-O-W Acreage Existing Use Proposed Use Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: / / / / Number of Lots By Zoning District / / / Floodplain Acreage Name E-mail Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number Yes No Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 9 Street Address PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name E-mail City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number NoYesIs there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Yes No Project Name: Date / Timeframe when submitted: City Project Number (if known): 1.67 11 0.249 vacant townhomes 0.249 11 PDD 0.084 Same as Applicant PDD 3010 E. Villa Maria Angel Cacho-Negrete kdhomebuilders@verizon.net Bryan TX 77803 TRIAL MODE − a valid license will remove this message. See the keywords property of this PDF for more information. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan; A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months; Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 9 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable): Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan; Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate / rural context; 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. TRIAL MODE − a valid license will remove this message. See the keywords property of this PDF for more information. Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 9 Requested Oversize Participation Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: Streets Sidewalks Sanitary Sewer Lines Water Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes / Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: No. of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee No. of acres in floodplain No. of acres in detention No. of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. DateSignature and title Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway / Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan - Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 7. 6. 0 Refer to attachment at the bottom. TRIAL MODE − a valid license will remove this message. See the keywords property of this PDF for more information. CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. 7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour) and post construction. 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE. Page 5 of 9Revised 5/15 Property Owner(s) Date Engineer Certification: 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE. Engineer Date TRIAL MODE − a valid license will remove this message. See the keywords property of this PDF for more information. Revised 5/15 Page 6 of 9 The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. , certify to the following: B. I, Engineer Date Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits: Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only Permits:* permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this C. I, DateEngineer Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments: A. I, certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study, that the alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not: (i) increase the Base Flood elevation; (ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor (v) increase Base Flood velocities. beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. Engineer Date * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate letter in lieu of certification. (i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm. Initial Daniel Beamon Daniel Beamon Daniel Beamon TRIAL MODE − a valid license will remove this message. See the keywords property of this PDF for more information. , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction. D. I, Engineer / Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate required). Page 7 of 9Revised 5/15 E. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement Commercial Structures: Residential Structures: of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation DateEngineer / Surveyor OR basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour) and post construction. DateEngineer / Surveyor I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork, Daniel Beamon TRIAL MODE − a valid license will remove this message. See the keywords property of this PDF for more information. If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created. FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: (Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.) North Arrow. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code. Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available data. Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data. Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2). The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision). Existing Proposed Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. Revised 5/15 Page 8 of 9 Ownership and Dedication Surveyor and/or Engineer City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat) Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat) Brazos County Clerk Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only) All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch. Title Block with the following information: Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos County 911.) Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. Date of preparation. Engineer's scale in feet. Total area intended to be developed. TRIAL MODE − a valid license will remove this message. See the keywords property of this PDF for more information. NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOI) must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit. Alleys. Easements. A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially). Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following: Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other utilities). Sewer Design Report. Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report. Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design, channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage layout of the subdivision. Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E. Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary. Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans). All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed. Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. Are there impact fees associated with this development? Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit. Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? If yes, TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents. Yes No Yes No Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee / surety in accordance with UDO Section 8.6. Existing Proposed Revised 5/15 Page 9 of 9 Print Form TRIAL MODE − a valid license will remove this message. See the keywords property of this PDF for more information. Reasons for Fee in Lieu of Sidewalk Construction The sidewalk between the proposed driveway and the northern boundary line of this property is not feasible to be built with this project due to the slope between the required deceleration lane and natural ground (4:1). This area is also located in the flood plain as well as in an area to be dedicated as additional right of way for Tarrow Street. In the event Tarrow Street is widened, the sidewalk in this location would have to be removed. Lastly, the sidewalk would end at the city limits line where there is currently no pedestrian facilities. CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATIONSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF BRAZOSI ___________________, owner and developer of the land shown on this plat, and designated herein asthe ________________________, Subdivision to the City of College Station, Texas, and whose name(s)is/are subscribed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of the public forever all streets, alleys, parks,infrastructure, easements, and public places thereon shown for the purpose and consideration thereinexpressed._________________________________________________________STATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF ____________Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared, _______________________known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, andacknowledged to me that he/they executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein stated.Given under my hand and seal on this ______ day of _______________, 2016._____________________________________________Notary Public, ____________ County, State of TexasPLAT NOTES:1. The Basis of Bearings for this Survey is the Texas State Plane Coordinate System, Central Zone, NAD 83 datum andwere determined by using a Trimble R6 VRS Network GPS.2. A portion of the subject property is located in Zone AE which is an area considered to be in the 100 year flood plain,the balance of the subject property is located in Zone X which is an area considered to be outside the 100 year floodplain as reflected on F.E.M.A. Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 48041C0215F for College Station,Texas, and Unincorporated Areas, dated April 2, 2014.3. This property is subject to a 20' wide Utility Easement, as depicted on the map or plat of Chimney Hill, as shownhereon. As depicted on said plat, said 20' easement is the assumed location (as constructed) of that certain (blanket)utility easement, described in instrument recorded in Vol. 139, Pg. 195, and that certain 20' electric easement,described in Vol. 335, Pg. 133, both of the Deed Records of Brazos County.CERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEERI _______________________, City Engineer of the City of College Station, Texas, hereby certify that thisSubdivision Plat conforms to the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the City of CollegeStation.____________________________________________City EngineerCity of College StationCERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERKSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF BRAZOSI, _____________________________, County Clerk, in and for said county, do hereby certify that this plattogether with its certificates of authentication was filed for record in my office the ______ day of________________, 201__, in the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, in Volume _____, Page_____.WITNESS my hand and official Seal, at my office in Bryan, Texas____________________________________________County ClerkBrazos County, TexasCERTIFICATE OF SURVEYORSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF BRAZOSI, James H. Thomas, Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 5736, in the State of Texas, herebycertify that this plat is true and correct and was prepared from an actual survey of the property and thatproperty markers and monuments were placed under my supervision on the ground.____________________________________________James H. Thomas, RPLS No. 5736APPROVAL OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONI _______________________, Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of CollegeStation, hereby certify that the attached plat was duly approved by the Commission on the ____ day of_______________, 201__.____________________________________________ChairmanAttest:____________________________________________SecretaryOWNER/DEVELOPER: KD HOMEBUILDERS, LLCSURVEYOR: THOMAS LAND SURVEYINGENGINEER: JOHNSON & PACE, INCORIGINAL PLATCHIMNEY HILL ADMINISTRATIVE& PROFESSIONAL TRACT1.668 ACRES1 LOT , ONE BLOCKCHIMNEY HILL SUBDVISION,VOL. 476, PG. 113 O.P.R.B.C.ADMINISTRATIVE & PROFESSIONALTRACTRICHARD CARTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 8COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASDATE: 10/31/2017SCALE: 1" = 30' FINAL PLAT OFTARROW TOWNHOMES 1.668 ACRES LOTS 1R-11R, BLOCK 1ANDCOMMON AREA #1BEING A REPLAT OF THE CHIMNEY HILLSUBDIVISION, VOL. 476, PG. 113 O.P.R.B.C.ADMINISTRATIVE & PROFESSIONAL TRACT RICHARD CARTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 8COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS DATE: 10/31/2017 SCALE: 1" = 30' OWNER/DEVELOPER: KD HOMEBUILDERS, LLC CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS I ___________________, owner and developer of the land shown on this plat, and designated herein as the ________________________, Subdivision to the City of College Station, Texas, and whose name(s) is/are subscribed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of the public forever all streets, alleys, parks, infrastructure, easements, and public places thereon shown for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. ____________________________________________ _____________ STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF ____________ Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared, _______________________ known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/they executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein stated. Given under my hand and seal on this ______ day of _______________, 2016. _____________________________________________ Notary Public, ____________ County, State of Texas PLAT NOTES: 1. The Basis of Bearings for this Survey is the Texas State Plane Coordinate System, Central Zone, NAD 83 datum and were determined by using a Trimble R6 VRS Network GPS. 2. A portion of the subject property is located in Zone AE which is an area considered to be in the 100 year flood plain, the balance of the subject property is located in Zone X which is an area considered to be outside the 100 year flood plain as reflected on F.E.M.A. Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 48041C0215F for College Station, Texas, and Unincorporated Areas, dated April 2, 2014. 3. This property is subject to a 20' wide Utility Easement, as depicted on the map or plat of Chimney Hill, as shown hereon. As depicted on said plat, said 20' easement is the assumed location (as constructed) of that certain (blanket) utility easement, described in instrument recorded in Vol. 139, Pg. 195, and that certain 20' electric easement, described in Vol. 335, Pg. 133, both of the Deed Records of Brazos County. 4. This property is subject to the terms, conditions and stipulations of that certain Ordinance No. 2016-3817 as it pertains to building setback lines. 5. All building lines and utility easements dedicated per previous plat (within the area of Administrative & Professional Tract) recorded in Volume 476, Page 113 of the Deed Records of Brazos County are hereby forever abandoned by this plat. 6. Private Drainage Easement and Private Access Easement are maintained by the Homeowner's Association. See the covenants, conditions, and restrictions for additional information. 7. No fences, grades, structures, landscape, etc. shall impede the flow of the private drainage easement. 8. An engineered slab or proof of compaction of fill will be required for any lots with more than two (2) feet of fill above the existing grade. Affects Lots 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11. 9. All finish floor elevations for properties in the floodplain must be at least one (1) foot above the designated Base Flood Elevation, 278.30', per Flood Insurance Rate Map as stated in note #2. CERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEER I _______________________, City Engineer of the City of College Station, Texas, hereby certify that this Subdivision Plat conforms to the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the City of College Station. ____________________________________________ City Engineer City of College Station CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS I, _____________________________, County Clerk, in and for said county, do hereby certify that this plat together with its certificates of authentication was filed for record in my office the ______ day of ________________, 201__, in the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, in Volume _____, Page_____. WITNESS my hand and official Seal, at my office in Bryan, Texas ____________________________________________ County Clerk Brazos County, Texas CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS I, James H. Thomas, Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 5736, in the State of Texas, hereby certify that this plat is true and correct and was prepared from an actual survey of the property and that property markers and monuments were placed under my supervision on the ground. ____________________________________________ James H. Thomas, RPLS No. 5736 APPROVAL OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I _______________________, Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, hereby certify that the attached plat was duly approved by the Commission on the ____ day of _______________, 201__. ____________________________________________ Chairman Attest: ____________________________________________ Secretary SURVEYOR: THOMAS LAND SURVEYING ENGINEER: JOHNSON & PACE, INC Planning & Zoning Commission November 17, 2017 Scale 1 multi-family lot on approximately 11.65 acres and right of way dedication of 0.35 acres. Location 1650 Arrington Rd. Applicant Philip Bargas, Johnson & Pace, Inc. Project Manager Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner rlazo@cstx.gov Project Overview This development plat is creating one lot on approximately 11.65 acres for a future multi-family development. Right of Way Dedication of 0.35 acres was dedicated along the west side of Arrington Road with the plat. Preliminary Plan Not Required Parkland Dedication Parkland Dedication fees of $687 per bedroom will be required at time of building permit. Impact Fees Subject to citywide impact fees—water, sanitary sewer, and roadway. Impact fees will be dependent upon timing of the building permit application date. Traffic Impact Analysis Not Required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes with the exception of waiver requests for UDO Sections 12-8.3.E.3 ‘Street Projections’, 12-8.3G.2 ‘Block Length’, and 12-8.3.G.4 ‘Block Perimeter.’ Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity Map & Aerial 2. Waiver requests 3. Application 4. Copy of Development Plat Development Plat For The Ranch at Arrington DVPL2017-000002 SUBDIVISION WAVIER REQUESTS The proposed Development Plat is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the UDO except for the following waiver request:  UDO Section 12-8.3.E.3. ‘Street Projections’ – Per the requirements of this section, a subdivision must provide public street projections: 1) In each cardinal direction around the proposed subdivision; 2) At intervals no fewer than the maximum block length along the perimeter boundary of the subdivision; and 3) To provide street connection or street frontage to land locked tracts that do not otherwise have frontage to a public street. The applicant is proposing to not project a public street to an existing land locked tract along its southwest boundary. In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver: 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The subject property is at the perimeter of the Urban land use designation in south College Station and would then be required to connect to the only remaining area designated Rural on this block. Additionally, there is an existing private access easement which gives the currently landlocked tract access to Arrington Road. The waiver provides the applicant an opportunity to restrict the number of access points to the proposed development as requested by the surrounding residents during the rezoning process. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waiver is not granted, the subject tract can still be platted but would potentially incur additional costs and need to reorient their site to account for this street projection. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and There is an existing private access easement in place allowing for the proper access to the one landlocked property through the property immediately to the south. The granting of the waiver for this development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property. 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Ideally, the currently landlocked tract would have received access from this street projection. However, it currently receives access from an adjoining property along Arrington through a private access easement. The landlocked tract could also potentially receive street access with the future platting of other adjacent tracts. SUBDIVISION WAVIER REQUESTS The proposed Development Plat is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the UDO except for the following waiver request: UDO Section 12-8.3.G.2. ‘Block Length’– Per the requirements of this section, block length shall not exceed 660 feet in Urban designations. The applicant is requesting this waiver as their preference is to not provide a break in block due to the 3 other thoroughfares which would tie into Arrington Road just south of this development. In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver: 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The subject tract has frontage to Arrington Road for approximately 711 linear feet. This portion of the block is roughly 50 feet beyond the City’s minimum block length. Shifting the intersection to the northeast property line would conflict with the minimum spacing required from Arrington Road, once extended to Greens Prairie Road, and if constructed along the southwest property line, it would have a large impact to the existing residential homes with the Estate land use designation which abuts the subject property. This waiver provides the applicant an opportunity to assist in minimizing impact to the adjacent residential properties, by not requiring a thoroughfare along secluded rural homes. The strict application of the provision would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the land. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waiver is not granted, the subject tract can still be platted but would potentially incur additional costs and need to reorient their site to account for this break in block length. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and The granting of this waiver to block length will not have negative impacts on public health, safety, welfare, or surrounding properties. Additionally, the waiver provides the applicant an opportunity to provide minimal connections to a substandard County road. 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Granting the requested waiver will not prevent future orderly subdivision in the area. Adjacent properties will be able to gain access from their current location along Arrington Road or through the private access easement which is currently in place. SUBDIVISION WAVIER REQUESTS The proposed Development Plat is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the UDO except for the following waiver request: UDO Section 12-8.3.G.4. ‘Block Perimeter– Per the requirements of this section, block perimeter shall not exceed 2,000 feet in Urban designations. The applicant is requesting this waiver as their preference is to not provide a break in block perimeter due to the 3 other thoroughfares which would tie into Arrington Road just south of this development. In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver: 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The property is at the edge of the Urban designation for this area, which consists of a more suburban style development pattern, rather than a standard Urban development. Based on the configuration of the existing and proposed thoroughfares, there is not a location to provide an additional public street that would not have significant impact to the preferred street spacing from existing intersections. The waiver provides the applicant an opportunity to assist in minimizing impact to the adjacent residential properties, by not requiring a thoroughfare adjacent to secluded rural homes. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waiver is not granted, the subject tract can still be platted but would potentially incur additional costs and need to reorient their site to account for this street projection. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and The granting of this waiver to block length will not have negative impacts on public health, safety, welfare, or surrounding properties. Additionally, the waiver provides the applicant an opportunity to provide minimal connections to a substandard County road. 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Granting the requested waiver will not prevent future orderly subdivision in the area. Adjacent properties will be able to gain access from their current location along Arrington Road or through the private access easement which is currently in place. C1TY OF Cm.LEGE STATION Home of1exns A&M U11ivmiry• FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: _____ _ TIME: STAFF: --------- DEVELOPMENT PLAT APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: � $990 Development Plat Application Fee. D $250 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). � $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 1.5% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public Infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance Is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). � Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. � Copy of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review). � Grading, drainage, and erosion control plan with supporting drainage report. � Public infrastructure plan and supporting documents (if applicable). � Title Report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens, encumbrances, etc. � Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station l.S.D. � The attached Development Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Note: A paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station l.S.D. will be due at the time of the mylar submittal prior to filing the plat. Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference ---------------­ NAME OF PROJECT The Ranch at Arrington ADDRESS 1650 Arrington Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Lot 1, Block 1 The Ranch at Arrington -Augustus Babille Survey A-75 SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT: West side of Arrington Road approx imately 750' south of South Oaks Drive APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Philip Bargas Street Address 111 University Drive, Suite 215 E-mail PhilipB@johnsonpace.com City College Station State _Ti_ex_a_s ______ Zip Code _7_78_4 _0 ____ _ Phone Number 979-485-2844 Fax Number ---------------- Page 1of8 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Amsfad Development, LLC E-mail -----------------� Street Address 2900 Cain Road ----------------------------------- City College Station state Texas Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ____ _ Phone Number 979-260-5000 Fax Number ---------------- ARCH 1 TE CT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name Johnson & Pace Incorporated Street Address 1201 NW Loop 28 1, Suite 100 City Longview E-mail jeffh@johnsonpace.com State Texas Zip Code 75604 --------------- Phone Number 903-753-0663 Fax Number 903-753-008 3 ---------------- Tot a I Acreage _1_2._0_0 _6 ____________ _ R-0-W Acreage 0.329 -------------� Curr �t mn �g ���ec iprope �_M _F_M_�_H _�_a_m_H_Y _______________________ _ Floodplain Acreage _ N_VA ________________________________ _ Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? 0Yes �No Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): 'NIA Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. NIA 2. The waiver Is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. NIA Revised 5/15 Page 2of 8 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. NIA 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area In accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance NIA Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: ___ Streets Sidewalks ___ Sanitary Sewer Lines 1,404 Water Lines Channels ___ Storm Sewers Bike Lanes I Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Development Plat: ACREAGE: No. of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee ------- ___ No. of acres in floodplain ___ No. of acres in detention --- No. of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: __ No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ = $ ------------ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board ---- NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPL/CATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. Signature and title Date Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 8 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. 7. if required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre­ pour) and post construction. 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9. if, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be In accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATIACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE. Property Owner(s) Engineer Certification: Date 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction Including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin .. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATIACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCU ,,... RATE. / /j// /;?// � 'i -z.t ... -z.on E�� Date Revised 5/15 Page 4 of8 The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only Permits:* certify, as demonstrated In the attached drainage study, that the alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not: (i) Increase the Base Flood elevation; (ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor (v) increase Base Flood velocities. beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. L � � _'-/_-U,_-2_D _l 7 ____ _ �9'(� 7 Date Initial �*If a platting-status exemption to this requirement Is asserted, provide written justification under separate L.:±SlJ letter in lieu of certification. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits: B. I, Jeff Hamilton, P.E. , certify to the following: (i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm. Ey�/� ?J-UrZol7 Date Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments: C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. Engineer Date Revised 5/15 Page 5 of8 Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate required). Residential Structures: D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction. Engineer I Surveyor Date Commercial Structures: E. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial Improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, Including all utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation Engineer I Surveyor Date OR I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the Intrusion of water in all areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre­ pour) and post construction. Engineer I Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: Revised 5/15 Page 6 of8 D Existing D D D Revised 9/14 DEVELOPMENT PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: (Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.) Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per Inch or larger. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and Its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow. Title Block with the following Information: [81 Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved [81 through Brazos County 911.) (Property that has been previously platted must retain original subdivision name.) [81 Date of preparation. [8J Engineer's scale in feet. [81 Total area shown on development plat. North Arrow. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. If more than 1 sheet, an Index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. All applicable certification. [8J Ownership and Dedication [81 Surveyor and/or Engineer [8J City Engineer [81 Planning and Zoning Commission [8J Brazos County Clerk D Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only) If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be installed on any lot In this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code. Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available data. Lot corner.markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data. The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision). Proposed D D D Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. Page 7 of 8 Existing D D D D D Proposed (g] D D (g] (g] A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block. Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages (All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board prior to P&Z Commission consideration.) Building, structure or Improvement or proposed modification of the external configuration of the building, structure, or improvement. Each easement and right-of-way, Including alleys, within or abutting the boundary of the surveyed property. Any part of the property intended to be dedicated to public use of for the use of purchasers or owners of lots fronting on or adjacent to the sidewalk, alley, square, park, or other part. (g] Construction documents for all public Infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following: 0 Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other utilities). O Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) (g] Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) O Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design, channel lining design & detention If used. One sheet must show the overall drainage layout of the subdivision. (g] Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E. 0 Letter of Completion for public infrastructure or guarantee I surety in accordance with UDO Section 8.6. 0 Drainage Report. (g] Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans). IRJ All off-site easements necessary for Infrastructure construction must be shown on the development plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed. Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. 0 Are there impact fees associated with this development? D Yes D No Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit. (g] Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? 0 Yes 181 No If yes, TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents. NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected development plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOi) must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit. Revised 5/15 Print Form Page 8 of8 1/2" IRON RODFOUND (CM)N: 10,186,428.78'E: 3,578,886.40'MAG NAILFOUND IN CONC1/2" IRON RODFOUND (CM)WOOD X-TIEFOUNDN: 10,185,713.46'E: 3,578,926.41'1/2" IRON RODFOUND (CM)1/2" IRON RODFOUND (CM)N: 10,186,018.98'E: 3,578,577.20'5/8" IRON RODFOUND (CM)N: 10,186,494.96'E: 3,578,032.76'5/8" IRON RODFOUND (CM)N: 10,186,666.22'E: 3,578,182.54'5/8" IRON RODFOUND (CM)N: 10,186,875.77'E: 3,578,097.96'1/2" IRON RODFOUND (CM)5/8" IRON RODFOUND (CM)N: 10,187,014.19'E: 3,578,219.64'5/8" IRON RODFOUND (CM)N: 10,186,806.16'E: 3,578,177.01'5/8" IRON RODFOUND (CM)1/2" IRON RODFOUND (CM)1/2" IRON RODFOUND (CM)N: 10,186,746.77'E: 3,578,524.05'4.55 ACRESSUZY JEANELL RICHARDSVOL. 10839, PG. 17, BCOPRZONED RURAL7.24 ACRESKEVIN WAYNE SCOTT, SR., ANDANNA VERINSKI SCOTT,TRUSTEE OF THE KEVIN WAYNESCOTT, SR., AND ANNA VERINSKISCOTT REVOCABLE TRUSTVOL. 11517, PG. 208, BCOPRZONED RURAL31.279 ACRESAPISPEDIGREE, LP.,VOL. 13478, PG. 281, BCOPRZONED RURALGREENS PRAIRIE CENTER, PHASE 3LOT 2R, BLOCK 3VOL. 10490, PG. 136, BCOPRZONED RURAL1.176 ACRESLOT 1, BLOCK 1,ARRINGTON TOWER SITEVOL. 11571, PG. 171, BCOPRZONED RURAL20' WATERLINE EASEMENTVOL. 5770, PG. 219, BCDR20' WATERLINE EASEMENTVOL. 5770, PG. 219, BCDR20' DRAINAGE EASEMENTVOL. 8813, PG. 117, BCDR20' DRAINAGE EASEMENTVOL. 8813, PG. 117, BCDRARRINGTON ROADVARIABLE WIDTH PRESCRIPTIVE R.O.W.50' ACCESS EASEMENTVOL. 10839, PG. 17, BCOPRLOT 1, BLOCK 111.653 ACRESN48° 50' 20"W, 1,187.52'N41° 10' 22"E, 227.52'N02° 15' 47"W, 140.05'N48° 37' 50"W, 105.33'N41° 18' 59"E, 184.30'S48° 43' 01"E, 887.28'S03° 46' 48"E, 223.70'S02° 59' 00"E, 492.87'20.0'PROPOSED 10.0'PU B L I C U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N TTO BE DEDICATEDBY SEPARATE INSTRUMENTR.O.W. DEDICATION0.353 ACRES20.0' BTU ELECTRIC EASEMENT20.0' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT360.40'S03° 47' 01"E, 79.48'28.34'N48° 19' 54"W,67.34'GREENS PRAIRIE CENTER, PHASE 3LOT 1R, BLOCK 3VOL. 10490, PG. 136, BCOPRS03° 51' 39"E, 319.18'N86° 54' 07"E, 321.10'(PLAT 319.90')N48° 38' 56"W, 455.75'0.012 ACRE BOUNDARY OVERLAP.REFER TO INSET "A" AND INSET "B"INSET "A"INSET "B"WM1/2" IRON RODFOUND1/2" IRON RODFOUND10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTVOL. 11571, PG. 171, BCDR10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTVOL. 11571, PG. 171, BCDR2 0 ' P O W E R L I N E E A S E M E N T V O L . 4 1 4 8 , P G . 1 , B C D R 20' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTVOL. 8830, PG. 64, BCDR20' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTVOL. 8830, PG. 64, BCDR20' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTVOL. 11574, PG. 171, BCDR20' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTVOL. 8830, PG. 64, BCDR1/2" IRON RODFOUND1/2" IRON RODFOUND1/2" IRON RODFOUND1/2" IRON RODFOUND900287.02FND 1/2 IRBLOCK ONE, NANTUCKET-PHASE ONELOT 1ZONED BRAZOS COUNTYLOT 2ZONED BRAZOS COUNTYLOT 3ZONED BRAZOS COUNTYLOT 4ZONED BRAZOS COUNTYLOT 16ZONED BRAZOS COUNTYLOT 17ZONED BRAZOS COUNTYSOUTH OAKS, VOLUME 519, PAGE 821, BCDRS O U T H O A K S D R I V E 5 0 ' R . O .W .453.66'S03° 03' 05"E, 635.96'80.0'80.0'21.21'23.67'34.04'15.00'34.04'18.25'11.95'15.00'11.95'158.62'149.45'26.04'15.00'25.98'143.35'26.01'15.00'25.98'100.14'213.83'98.60'27.00'15.00'27.00'61.01'6.76'22.37'15.00'75.07'46.50'15.00'46.50'228.62'102.82'51.95'15.00'51.91'196.86'51.98'15.00'52.02'93.16'181.78'103.27'1 5 . 5 0 '15.00'1 5 . 5 0 '79.71'60.50'12.02'15.00'12.02'202.97'41.84'147.34'13.28'229.90'38.50'15.00'38.50'35.66'284.43'33.82'49.42'42.40'15.00'42.40'4 3 . 5 2 '15.00'107.52'107.35'5 9 . 5 0 '15.00'5 9 . 5 0 '39.21'597.65'50.18'71.38'15.47'14.04'30.00'14.04'63.52'189.02'90.74'168.64'43.75'452.19'6.13'15.00' 6.13'58.50'N:10,185,917.80'E:3,578,738.53'N:10,186,485.97'E:3,578,102.94'N:10,186,617.41'E:3,578,217.88'N:10,186,708.06'E:3,578,214.32'N:10,186,845.51'E:3,578,335.19'N:10,186,927.34'E:3,578,242.04'N:10,186,662.92'E:3,578,543.02'N:10,186,533.04'E:3,578,690.85'N:10,186,335.21'E:3,578,698.44'N:10,186,125.59'E:3,578,515.13'N:10,186,345.23'E:3,578,263.92'15.00'15.00'15.00'15.00'15.00'15.00'1 5 . 0 0 '104.48'121.77'18.27'0.85'13.28'166.23'9.41'24.40'167.48'24.41' 24.41'10.00'1 0 . 0 0 '550.69'22.37'68.96'183.03'69.77'30.02'27.90'41.87'188.94'175.62'15.00'167.48'15.00'525.69'464.35'723.17'N:10,185,931.05'E:3,578,737.64'N:10,185,820.83'E:3,578,849.45'N:10,185,821.36'E:3,578,859.44'N:10,186,028.86'E:3,578,565.91'N:10,186,047.23'E:3,578,581.97'N:10,186,082.37'E:3,578,564.56'N:10,186,092.25'E:3,578,553.27'N:10,186,184.88'E:3,578,447.32'N:10,186,513.35'E:3,578,048.84'N:10,186,488.17'E:3,578,767.13'N:10,186,385.70'E:3,578,819.08'N:10,186,492.23'E:3,578,814.14'24.43' 15.00'188.09' 30.00'30.00'3 0 . 0 0 '20.00'20.00'2 1 . 7 8 '20.67'30.00'ELEVATIONELEVATIONS T A T I O N P R O F I L E V I EW H : 1 " = 4 0 ' , V : 1 " = 4 ' 2 7 8 2 8 0 2 8 2 2 8 4 2 8 6 2 7 8 ' 2 8 0 ' 2 8 2 ' 2 8 4 ' 2 8 6 ' 0 + 0 0 . 0 0 0 + 4 0 . 0 0 PR O P O S E D GR O U N D PR O P O S E D C O L L E G E ST A T I O N 1 2 " W A T E R LIN E PR O P O S E D RE L O C A T E D 1 2 " W W U W A T E R L I N E PR O P O S E D R E L O C A T E D 8 " W W U W A T E R L I N E 15.00'15.00'15.00'15.00'2 0 . 0 0 ' N85° 2 8 ' 3 7 " W , 3,518. 7 3 '1/2" IRON RODFOUND1/2" IRON RODFOUND5/8" IRON RODFOUNDS86° 54' 07"W, 1.20'S48° 38' 56"E, 455.75'MAG NAIL INCONCRETE FOUNDS03° 47' 01"E, 79.48'N03° 51' 39"W, 2.10'N48° 38' 56"W, 455.75'5/8" IRON RODSETFilename: F:\CollegeStationShare\4149 Inscore\4149-003 TR Inscore - The Ranch at Arrington\CAD\SURVEY\DRAWINGS\CONSTRUCTION PLAT.dwg FINAL PLAT OFTHE RANCH AT ARRINGTON1 LOT, 1 BLOCKBEING A DEVELOPMENT PLAT OF 11.653 ACRESBEING ALL OF 12.00 ACRESPHYLLIS SCHROEDER ALVAREZ, ET AL,TO AMSTAD DEVELOPMENT LLC,VOLUME 13878, PAGE 217, BCOPRAUGUSTUS BABILLE SURVEY, A-75BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASJOB #4149-003JOHNSON & PACE INCORPORATED1201 NW LOOP 281, SUITE 100, LONGVIEW, TEXAS 75604(903)753-0663 FAX (903)753-8803WWW.JOHNSONPACE.COMTBPLS 10025400TBPE F-4691BOOK 898, PG 23DRAWN BY: NWNOCT. 31, 2017NOTES:1. BEARINGS AND COORDINATES ARE BASED UPON THE TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (NAD83),CENTRAL ZONE.2. DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GRID DISTANCES. TO CONVERT TO SURFACE DISTANCES DIVIDE GRID DISTANCES BYTHE SCALE FACTOR: 0.9999067.3. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED UPON "NAVD 88" AND REFERENCED TO SAME NGS STATIONS.4. ACCORDING TO FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS FORBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, COMMUNITY - PANEL NO. 481195 0325 E, DATED MAY 16, 2012, THIS PROPERTY ISLOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE "X" - "AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN".5. ZONING RESTRICTIONS: MULTI FAMILY (MF) (PER COLLEGE STATION ONLINE ZONING MAP)6. PROPERTY HAS DIRECT PHYSICAL ACCESS TO ARRINGTON ROAD.7. THIS PROJECT IS REFERENCED TO CITY MONUMENT #11.VICINITY MAP SCALE 1" = 1000'PROJECTLOCATIONLEGEND(CM) CONTROLLING MONUMENT5/8" IRON ROD SETLINE LEGENDBOUNDARY LINEEASEMENT LINESS OAKS DROLD ARRINGTON RDARRINGTON RDWHITES CREEK LNST A T E H I G H W A Y 4 0 STATE HIGHWAY 6ENGINEER / SURVEYOROWNERCERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATIONSTATE OF TEXAS }COUNTY OF BRAZOS }WE, AMSTAD DEVELOPMENT LLC, OWNERS AND DEVELOPER OF THE LAND SHOWN ONTHIS PLAT AND DESIGNATED HEREIN AS "THE RANCH AT ARRINGTON" SUBDIVISION TOTHE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS AND WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED HERETO,HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS,GREENWAYS, INFRASTRUCTURE, EASEMENTS, AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWNFOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. ALL SUCH DEDICATIONSSHALL BE IN FEE SIMPLE UNLESS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED OTHERWISE.___________________________________________BY:______________________________NAME:______________________________TITLE:______________________________STATE OF TEXAS }COUNTY OF BRAZOS }BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED _______________,KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT,AND ACKNOWLEDGE TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATIONTHEREIN STATED.GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS THE _______ DAY OF ____________, 2017.______________________________________________NOTARY PUBLICCERTIFICATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONI, ______________________________________, CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING AND ZONINGCOMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED PLATWAS DULY APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION ON THE _____ DAY OF _______________, 2017______________________________________________CHAIRMANCERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEERI, ______________________________________, CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT CONFORMS TO THE REQUIREMENTS OFTHE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION.______________________________________________CITY ENGINEERCERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CLERKSTATE OF TEXAS }COUNTY OF BRAZOS }I, ______________________________________, COUNTY CLERK IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY, DOHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT TOGETHER WITH ITS CERTIFICATES OF AUTHENTICATION,WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE THE _____ DAY OF _________________, 2017, IN THEOFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS IN VOLUME _______, PAGE _______.WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL,AT MY OFFICE IN BRYAN, TEXAS.______________________________________________COUNTY CLERK, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BY: ______________________________________________DEPUTYPRELIMINARYNOT TO BE RECORDEDFOR ANY PURPOSEMARCH 01, 2017SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE:I, TROY MAXWELL, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THIS PLAT AS THEREPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND UNDER MY SUPERVISION OF ASUBDIVISION OF 11.653 ACRES, BEING ALL OF 12.00 ACRES CONVEYED FROM RODRICK K. WOLFTO RODRICK K. WOLF AND SHARON B. WOLF, AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE RICK AND SHARON WOLFREVOCABLE TRUST, BY AN INSTRUMENT OF RECORD IN VOLUME 13033, PAGE 235, BCOPR. ALLBLOCK CORNERS, LOT CORNERS, ANGLE POINTS, BEGINNING AND ENDING OF CURVES ANDBOUNDARY CORNERS ARE MARKED WITH 5/8" X 2' IRON RODS UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. ALLOF SAID SUBDIVISION IS INSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS.____________________________ ___________________TROY MAXWELL, RPLS DATEREGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORTEXAS REGISTRATION NO. 5585INSET "A" SCALE 1" = 5'INSET "B" SCALE 1" = 5'CITY MONUMENT #113/4" ALUMINUM RODELEV: 283.664'N: 10,188,165.438'E: 3,581,934.102'AMSTAD DEVELOPMENT, LLC.2900 CAIN ROADCOLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 7784515' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 15' PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1 inch = ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE03015 306012060NOTE: PLAT AND SITE PLANINFRASTRUCTURE TO BECONSTRUCTED AT THE SAME TIME. November 16, 2017 Regular Agenda Comprehensive Plan Amendment – WP 47 & M-MC-J Properties To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Jenifer Paz, AICP, Principal Planner Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use & Character Map from Business Park to Urban for approximately 11 acres generally located at 8822 Burgess Lane and near the east intersection of State Highway 47 and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. Case #CPA2017-000015 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the December 14th City Council Meeting- Subject to change.) Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. Summary: The applicant has requested an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use and Character Map from Business Park to Urban in order to request multi-family land use. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Changed or changing conditions in the subject area or the City: Conditions in the general subject area have seen significant changes in the past six years. The interlocal agreement between the cities of College Station and Bryan (adopted in 2011 and intended to encourage economic development in the area) resulted in significant investments in infrastructure improvements and extensions around the area for water, sewer, road, and electric. With shared implementation of the BioCorridor Planned Development District (to the north of the subject tracts), both cities have seen private investment in additional infrastructure and office, research and development, and manufacturing facilities via Fujifilm to the north (formerly CIADM), Nutrabolt, and ViaSat (currently under construction). With infastructure improvements complete or under construction and development beginning inside of the BioCorridor PDD, properties in the vicinity of the PDD began showing interest/experiencing pressure for development. In 2013, the City initiated a small area study to consider what may be appropriate land uses in the vicinity of the PDD. The majority of the area is designated as Business Park on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. After public meetings and engagement on future land uses, the City Council discussed their thoughts and concerns regarding land uses in the area at their regular meeting on February 27, 2014. The following summarizes their comments: • The concept of the BioCorridor (business park) in College Station extends beyond the ILA. The private property to the south of Raymond Stotzer in the city limits should be considered as a part of this area. • Commercial is expected/okay for those properties with frontage along SH 47 (not along Raymond Stotzer, except perhaps at intersections). Not all General Commercial uses are okay, but hotels would be acceptable. Large-scale retail is undesirable in this area. • Aesthetics are as important as land uses in the area. The City Council Economic Development Committee later in 2015 provided direction that because of the investments in the area, the area should be protected for appropriate business development and that the existing land use designations should be retained and Plan amendments should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Their comments reiterated those of the larger Council discussion, with the direction that multifamily is undesirable in the direct vicinity of the BioCorridor PDD and should only be a consideration east of Turkey Creek Road. In 2016, the six-acres adjacent to the subject tract to the northwest (CamWest) was rezoned to PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning of BP Business Park, which also allows uses such as educational facilities, commercial, office and retail. Also in 2016, 5.5 acres of the subject property was also rezoned to PDD Planned Development District. The base zoning of the current PDD is BP Business Park and allows additional uses such as hotels, restaurant, retail sales, and educational facilities. This and the CamWest PDD are consistent with the Business Park land use designation on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use and Character Map. The property has remained undeveloped since the rezoning. Additionally, in 2016, the Texas A&M University System announced their plans to create a new high-tech research, technology development, and education campus at the intersection of State Highway 47 and State Highway 21 (six miles northwest of the subject property). The RELLIS Campus began construction this year. 2. Scope of the request: The subject property is located within the Presidential Corridor Gateway District, which is an area that offers many opportunities for future growth and development. The focus of this district is to accommodate business, such as research and development; office; and light industrial, that builds upon the assets in the area and protects and enhances this primary gateway into the City. The request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designation for approximately 11 acres from Business Park to Urban. If approved by City Council, the applicant intends to pursue a rezoning of the property to include multi-family land use in the PDD Planned Development District. A request for rezoning was submitted for consideration and will be heard following this item. The Comprehensive Plan describes Business Park as areas that include office, research, or industrial uses planned and developed as a unified project. The proposed land use designation, Urban, is intended for areas that should have very intense level of development activities. These areas will tend to consist of townhomes, duplexes, and high-density apartments. General commercial and office uses, business parks, and vertical mixed-use may also be permitted within growth and redevelopment areas. 3. Availability of adequate information: Urban land use designation allows for very intense level of development activities, such as townhomes, duplexes, and high-density apartments. The properties in this area are served by College Station Utilities (CSU) and City of Bryan Utilities (BTU). Domestic water service and electric is available through CSU and sanitary sewer will be provided by BTU. Additional infrastructure improvements may be needed with site improvements. The land use amendment did not warrant a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), but was provided with the rezoning request. 4. Consistency with the goals and strategies set forth in the Plan: The goal for College Station’s Future Land Use and Character is to create a community with strong, unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a protected and enhanced natural environment. In addition, the City’s Economic Development Master Plan states that “land use and planning regulations should provide adequate opportunities to respond to market opportunities” as it relates to supporting and stimulating biotechnology research and advanced manufacturing. The Comprehensive Plan specifically identifies this area of the City as the Presidential Corridor Gateway District, stating that this area should focus on accommodating business such as research and development, office, and light industrial that builds upon the assets in the area and protects and enhances this primary gateway into the City. This is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use & Character Map designation of this property as Business Park. The Business Park land use designation is suitable for the property as it continues the development opportunities made possible through the public investments in the area. It also has the access to major thoroughfares and the regional airport that is typically important to Business Park land uses. Easterwood Airport is identified as a community asset in the Comprehensive Plan, allowing connection to the greater region. The Plan states that care should be taken to protect such assets from encroachment by incompatible land uses that would compromise their contribution to the area’s character and identity. The area of Burgess Lane is directly under the flight path of Runway 10. Residential development in such proximity to airport function is not considered compatible to the airport. Directly adjacent to the subject property is the BioCorridor PDD Planned Development District, which promotes technology research and development and manufacturing through a mixed-use zoning district. The BioCorridor PDD is an example of a property that fits the intentions of this area. The BioCorridor PDD does allow for some residential use, but it is confined to multifamily located on second floors or above of office, retail, or research and development facilities that are in the vicinity of Health Science Center Parkway and Turkey Creek Road (east of the greenway). The proposed land use designation for the subject property, Urban, is generally for intense development activities consisting of townhomes, duplexes and high-density apartments. The Urban land use designation would allow for uses that are not generally compatible with business park development or the planned vision for the overall area. This amendment could become a precedent that affects land use patterns within the vicinity, create incompatibilities with the existing industrial office developments, and reduce the available land that can serve as one of the City’s main employment growth areas. 5. Consideration of the Future Land Use & Character and/or Thoroughfare Plans: The current land use of Business Park is intended for areas that include office, research, or industrial uses planned and developed as a unified project. Generally, these areas need good access to arterial roadways. The proposed land use of Urban is intended for very intense level of development such as high-density apartments and townhomes. The property has frontage on State Highway 47 and Raymond Stotzer Parkway, both designated as Freeway/Expressway on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. The property also has access to Burgess Lane, which is a private access drive from Raymond Stotzer Parkway and proposed to be the future extension of Biomedical Way, a local street currently serving a research and development/manufacturing facility. Access such as this can be valuable for Business Park uses. 6. Compatibility with the surrounding area: The proposed amendment to Urban would allow for the property to be zoned for dense residential development. Amending the Comprehensive Plan in this area would not be compatible with the existing zoning and development directly north and any future proposed within the vicinity of the BioCorridor PDD. Multi-family development could limit potential manufacturing and industrial development and spark additional residential development within the area. This would reduce opportunity for business and commercial development. The subject property includes a portion that is currently zoned PDD Planned Development District and an additional 5.5 acres, to the northeast, zoned R Rural. The subject property and the surrounding is designated as Business Park in the Comprehensive Plan. The properties to the east are developed as single-family and storage facilities. To the west, the properties are vacant and undeveloped. To the north, located in the BioCorridor District, is Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies. The current land use designation, Business Park, will allow for zoning that supports the development of office and research and industrial uses that are compatible with the surrounding area. 7. Impacts on infrastructure including water, wastewater, drainage, and the transportation network: W ater service is currently provided by College Station Utilities. Water line improvements will be necessary at the time the site develops. Sewer service is provided by Bryan Utilities (BTU). BTU has indicated that there is capacity in the Burgess Lane lift station to provide service to the future development. Additionally, the property is in the Whites Creek drainage basin. The site generally drains south, towards SH 47. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. 8. Impact on the City’s ability to provide, fund, and maintain services: The proposed amendment for the subject property does not negatively impact the City’s ability to provide, fund, and maintain services. 9. Impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas: The proposed amendment for the subject property does not negatively impact environmentally sensitive and natural areas or does not prevent the preservation of such areas. 10. Contribution to the overall direction and character of the community as captured in the Plan’s vision and goals: The goal for College Station’s Future Land Use and Character is to create a community with strong, unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a protected and enhanced natural environment. The Comprehensive Plan specifically identifies the Presidential Corridor Gateway District as an area that ought to focus on “accommodating business (research and development, office, and light industrial) that builds upon the assets in the area and protects and enhances this primary gateway into the City.” The proposed amendment from Business Park to Urban on approximately 11 acres impedes on this goal by proposing the ability to develop an incompatible, intense residential land use adjacent to existing and planned industrial office developments. This amendment could set a precedent that affects land use patterns within the vicinity, create incompatibilities with the existing industrial office developments, and reduce the available land that can serve as the City’s main employment growth area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the Future Land Use and Character Map amendment request. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Background Information 2. Aerial and Amendment Exhibit 3. Application 4. Comprehensive Plan Map NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: November 16, 2017 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: December 14, 2017 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Contacts in support: None Contacts in opposition: None Inquiry contacts: None ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Business Park PDD Planned Development District FujiFilm Diosynth Biotechnologies South (across SH 47) Business Park R Rural Single-family East Business Park R Rural Storage facilities West Business Park R Rural Vacant DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: June 1995 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon Annexation A-O Agricultural Open renamed to R Rural in 2014 R Rural to PDD Planned Development District in 2016 (approx. 5.5 acres) Final Plat: Property is unplatted Site development: Property is undeveloped along State Highway 47. The remainder is developed as storage facilities and manufactured home sites. I VICINITY MAP I \ , \ \ ,• , I I .. , ' ' ' .. ... .. .. ... ... .. .. - - - ' ' \ ' ' «' t. ' q ' ":. ' u \ :: \ � ' l I I I I ' \ \ \ l I I I I I I I I I I , , FOR OFFICE USE ONLY •CASE NO.:_________ DATE SUBMITTED:_________ TIME: STAFF: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Date of Optional Preapplication Conference N/A NAME OF PROJECT M-MC-J &WP 47 Rezoning ADDRESS SH47 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot,Block,Subdivision) A002601,John H Jones (ICL),Tract 74-75-76,5.591 Acres GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY,IF NOT PLATTED: SH 47 Frontage Road between Burgess Lane and Health Science Center Parkway TOTAL ACREAGE 5.591 Acres APPLICANT I PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Jim Jett E-mail llett66@gmall.com Street Address 6616 Imperial Loop Suite 10 City College Station State ~ Phone Number 979-571-4341 Fax Number Zip Code 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexasA~M University~ (Check all applicable) Related to Community Character ~Related to Transportation MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Related to Other $1,240 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Fee. ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Fully dimensioned map on 24”X 36”paper showing (if applicable): a.Land affected; b.Present zoning of property and zoning classification of all abutting property; c.Current Concept Map and Future Land Use and Character Map classifications and proposed classifications; d.Current Concept Map and Future Land Use and Character Map classifications of all abutting property; e.Current and proposed thoroughfare alignments; f.Currently planned utility infrastructure and proposed utility infrastructure; g.General location and address of property;and h.Total acres of property. 5/15 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION: Name WP 47 Development LTD E-mail eng©schultzeng.com Street Address 8822 Burgess Lane City College Station State ~Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 9797643900 Fax Number __________________________________ ANSWER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: 1.What specific element of the Comprehensive Plan (for example,Land Use and Character designation,Thoroughfare Plan Context Class,or thoroughfare alignment)and at what specific location (if applicable)is requested to be amended? We are seeking a change in land use from business park to urban. 2.What is the amendment request? The Comprehensive Plan had the future development for this property to be Business Park,which is to be amended to Urban.This change will be compatible with the desired land uses planned for the adjacent Bio Corridor. 3.Explain the reason for this amendment. The development of the adjacent BioCorridor area has commenced and there will be a demand for urban development to support and compliment the research and manufacturing uses within the BioCorridor.Also, the RELLIS campus development will increase the demand for retail and residential land uses along the SH 47 and Fm 60 Corridor. 4.Identify the conditions that have changed to warrant this change to the existing Comprehensive Plan. The development of the adjacent BioCorridor area has commenced and there will be a demand for urban development to support and compliment the research and manufacturing uses within the BioCorridor.Also,the RELLIS campus development will increase the demand for retail and residential land uses along the SH 47 and Fm 60 Corridor. 5.Explain why the existing element of the Comprehensive Plan in question is no longer appropriate. There is a considerable amount land in the BioCorridor that will need these supporting uses.Also,the RELLIS campus development will increase the demand for retail and residential land uses along the SH 47 and Fm 60 Corridor. 6.How does the requested amendment further the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan is for this land to be Business Park, the change to urban will allow the addition of land uses which will compliment the Blo Corridor and the RELLIS campus and also conform with the policies,goals and the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 5/15 Page2of3 7.What other information are you providing to support the proposed amendment (for example,transportation impact study)? Development of the land near the BioCorridor to compliment the BioCorridor uses and the RELLIS campus will be necessaly.A TIA was submitted with the PDD rezoning request for this development. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf. 4u4tt&q Signature and title Date 5/15 I~~!~h1~F4~[b~*I Page 3 of 3 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: STAFF:________ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION (Check all applicable) Related to Community Character ~Related to Transportation Related to Other MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~,.$1240 bomprehensiv&Plan Amendment Application Fee. ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Fully dimensioned map on 24”X 36”paper showing (if applicable): a.Land affected; b.Present zoning of property and zoning classification of all abutting property; c.Current Concept Map and Future Land Use and Character Map classifications and proposed classifications;V d.Current Concept Map and Future Land Use and Character Map classifications of all abutting property; e.Current and proposed thoroughfare alignments; f.Currently planned utility infrastructure and proposed utility infrastructure; g.General location and address of property;and h.Total acres of property Date of Optional Preapplication Conference N/A NAME OF PROJECT M-MC-J &WP 47 Rezoning ADDRESS SH47 V LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot,Block,Subdivision) A002601,John H Jones (ICL),Tract 74-75-76, 5.59 1 Acres GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY,IF NOT PLATTED: ~SH 47 Frontage Road between Burgess Lane and Health Science Center Parkway TOTAL ACREAGE 5.591 Acres APPLICANT I PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Jim Jett Street Address 6616 Imperial Loop Suite 10 City College Station Phone Number 9795714341 E-mail llett66@gmall.com State TX Fax Number Zip Code 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M University” 5/15 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION: Name M-MC-J Partnership E-mail Eng~schultzeng.com Street Address 6616 Imperial Loop Suite 10 City College Station State ~‘Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 9797643900 Fax Number __________________________________ ANSWER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: 1 What specific element of the Comprehensive Plan (for example,Land Use and Character designation,Thoroughfare Plan Context Class, or thoroughfare alignment)and at what specific location (if applicable)is requested to be amended? We are seeking a change in land use from business park to urban. 2.What is the amendment request? The Comprehensive Plan had the future development for this property to be Business Park,which is to be amended to Urban. This change will be compatible with the desired land uses planned for the adjacent BioCorridor. 3.Explain the reason for this amendment. The development of the adjacent Bio Corridor area has commenced and there will be a demand for urban development to support and compliment the research and manufacturing uses within the BioCorridor.Also, the RELLIS campus development will increase the demand for retail and residential land uses along the SH 47 and Fm 60 Corridor. 4.Identify the conditions that have changed to warrant this change to the existing Comprehensive Plan. The development of the adjacent Bio Corridor area has commenced and there will be a demand for urban development to support and compliment the research and manufacturing uses within the BioCorridor.Also,the RELLIS campus development will increase the demand for retail and residential land uses along the SH 47 and Fm 60 Corridor. 5.Explain why the existing element of the Comprehensive Plan in question is no longer appropriate. There is a considerable amount land in the BioCorridor that will need these supporting uses.Also,the RELLIS campus development will increase the demand for retail and residential land uses along the SH 47 and Fm 60 Corridor. 6.How does the requested amendment further the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan is for this land to be Business Park,the change to urban will allow the addition of land uses which will compliment the BioCorridor and the RELLIS campus and also conform with the policies,goals and the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 5/15 Page2of3 7.What other information are you providing to support the proposed amendment (for example,transportation impact study)? Development of the land near the Bio Corridor to compliment the Bio Corridor uses and the RELLIS campus will be necessa,y.A TIA was submitted with the PDD rezoning request for this development. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf.9 Z7~/7 Signatur and title Date 5/15 Page 3 of 3 BURGESS LANE BIOMEDICAL WAY STA T E HI G H W A Y 4 7 BURGESS LANE BIOMEDICAL WAY STA T E HI G H W A Y 4 7 URBAN 3.05 ACRES URBAN 8.08 ACRES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 11.13 ACRES - WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD AND M-MC-J PROPERTIES OWNER/DEVELOPER: M-MC-J PROPERTIES 6166 IMPERIAL LOOP SUITE 10 COLLEGE STAION, TX 77845 (979) 571-4341 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE STA T E H I G H W A Y 4 7 B U R G E S S L A N E FM 60 OWNER: WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD 8822 BURGESS LN COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 APPLICANT: JIM JETT 6166 IMPERIAL LOOP SUITE 10 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 (979)571-4341 PROPOSED LAND USEEXISTING LAND USE November 16, 2017 Regular Agenda Rezoning – WP 47 & M-MC-J Properties To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Jenifer Paz, AICP, Principal Planner Planning & Development Services Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District and R Rural to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 11 acres at 8822 Burgess Lane and near the east intersection of State Highway 47 and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. Case #REZ2017-000024 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the December 14th City Council Meeting- Subject to change.) Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the rezoning. Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 11 acres from PDD Planned Development District and R Rural to PDD Planned Development District. There is a current PDD Planned Development District located on approximately 5.5 acres that allows specific GC General Commercial land uses in addition to all uses allowed in BP Business Park. This request is to extend that PDD onto an additional 5.5 acres that are currently zoned R Rural. In addition, the applicant is seeking to modify the existing PDD to change the base zoning district from BP Business Park to GC General Commercial, and to allow for multi-family and extended care/facility/convalescent/nursing home uses and mixed use structures. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject properties are designated Business Park on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map and are also located in Presidential Corridor Gateway District. The Comprehensive Plan describes Business Park as areas that include office, research, or industrial uses planned and developed as a unified project. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use & Character Map to Urban, described in the Comprehensive Plan as areas intended for intense development activities consisting of townhomes, duplexes and high- density apartments. Should this amendment request be denied, this rezoning request would no longer be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as is required by the UDO. With good access to thoroughfares and proximity of Easterwood Airport, this area was identified in the Comprehensive Plan as one that should focus on accommodating business, including research and development, office, and light industrial. These uses should build on the assets existing in the area while protecting and enhancing this primary gateway into the City. In addition, the City’s Economic Development Master Plan states that “land use and planning regulations should provide adequate opportunities to respond to market opportunities” as it relates to supporting and stimulating biotechnology research and advanced manufacturing. Although the proposed development allows for some uses that are consistent with the intentions of the Presidential Corridor Gateway District and future land use designations, it also proposes residential uses that are not consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and not compatible with adjacent land uses. These residential land uses could set a precedent that affect land use patterns within the vicinity, create incompatibilities with the existing industrial office developments, and reduce the available land that the Comprehensive Plan identifies as one of the City’s main employment growth areas. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: A portion of the property is currently zoned R Rural, which allows for agricultural type uses and large lot single-family. It is currently developed as storage facilities and mobile home sites. The remainder of the property is currently vacant and undeveloped along State Highway (SH) 47 and is zoned PDD Planned Development District. The PDD has a base zoning of BP Business Park with additional education, commercial, and retail type uses permitted. The existing R Rural zoning district and development within this portion of the property is not compatible or supportive of more intense development that is anticipated for the area. Given the property’s close proximity to the BioCorridor PDD, this area is expected to contain uses that support the investment plan that has been set in this District. Specifically, it is adjacent to the BioC-M Manufacturing area, which allows the most intensive manufacturing businesses of the district. An R Rural designation does not support the planned growth. The proposed PDD would allow for development that is supportive of the surrounding properties, such as the commercial, office and retail uses but would also allow multi-family residential, which is an incompatible use with the future land use, Business Park. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the districts that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed land uses that would be permitted through this specific PDD include GC General Commercial uses and all uses permitted in BP Business Park. The GC General Commercial uses are uses that would serve the larger region. These uses include education facilities, college and university, educational facility- indoor instruction, hotels, restaurant, day care (commercial), Nightclub, Bar or Tavern (permitted with a Conditional Use Permit), and retail sales and service (maximum of 15,000 square feet). The BP Business Park uses is intended for more industrial, research and development or office development activity, which are appropriate as they support the uses planned in the BioCorridor PDD and the property’s frontage along SH 47 and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. The proposed PDD would also allow residential uses, being multi-family, extended care/facility/convalescent/nursing home and mixed use structures. Residential uses at this location would be under the flight path for one of the runways at Easterwood Airport. Although residential may be a supporting land use to nearby growth, it can also create incompatibilities and reduce opportunity for the industrial office development that is anticipated in this area of the city. The intent of the area surrounding the BioCorridor District is to help preserve and support this district by providing similar and supplementary uses that focus on research and development, manufacturing, office uses, and other additional uses that would serve those that live and work in the area. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The subject properties are zoned PDD Planned Development District and R Rural. The existing zoning of R Rural will allow for one single-family home and for agricultural uses. Although the property can be developed with the current zoning district, it is not suitable for this property given the recent business park development in the general area. The proposed PDD proposes a base zoning of GC General Commercial but limits its uses to education facilities, college and university, educational facility- indoor instruction, hotels, restaurant, day care (commercial), Nightclub, Bar or Tavern (permitted with a Conditional Use Permit), retail sales and service (maximum of 15,000 square feet) and all uses permitted in BP Business Park. The General Commercial uses can serve as supporting uses to the Business Park development anticipated in the area. These supporting commercial uses have been anticipated along SH 47. The proposed PDD would also allow some residential uses—multi-family, extended care/facility/convalescent/nursing home, and mixed use structures. These uses are not suitable given it impedes on the goals of the vicinity by proposing the ability to develop an incompatible, intense residential land use. It is worth noting that directly adjacent to the subject property is the BioCorridor PDD that promotes technology research and development and manufacturing through a mixed-use zoning district, fitting the intentions set in the Comprehensive Plan for this area. The BioCorridor PDD does allow for some residential use, but it is confined to multifamily located on second floors or above of office, retail, or research and development facilities that are in the vicinity of Health Science Center Parkway and Turkey Creek Road (east of the greenway). In comparison to the BioCorridor PDD, the proposed PDD does not ensure a mix of residential and non-residential uses that would be compatible with the goals set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for this area. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The marketability of the entire tract will increase if rezoned as proposed. Currently a portion of the property is marketable as an agricultural homestead due to the current zoning district, R Rural. The applicant has stated that the use is not appropriate or feasible for this property. Although the proposed uses will allow the property to become more marketable, the residential component of the proposed PDD may infringe on the overall direction of the Comprehensive Plan and the vision for this area. These uses may make it more difficult to market to business park uses on adjacent properties. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: There is an existing 18-inch water main to the northeast of the property, which will need to be extended to and through the property to provide water service. The sanitary service for this property will be provided by the City of Bryan (BTU). Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. Existing infrastructure appears to be adequate for the proposed use at this time. The subject tract has frontage to the SH 47 Frontage Road and Burgess Lane, which is a private roadway. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was performed and no traffic mitigation was identified with the proposed rezoning except for the potential of right-turn deceleration lanes into the development’s access points. Access to the SH 47 Frontage Road is contingent upon driveway permit approval by TxDOT at the time of site development. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building and parking areas as well as other site related features. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD Concept Plans: 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. General: The proposed Concept Plan includes the list of proposed allowable uses—specific GC General Commercial uses, all uses in BP Business Park and specific residential uses. The development will follow all requirements of GC General Commercial zoning district with buildings ranging in height from 20 feet to 72 feet following the Easterwood Airport height restrictions. In an effort to accommodate as much flexibility as possible, the applicant has chosen to not identify the location of land uses of the Concept Plan. The 11 acres may be only one, or a mixture, of any of the allowable uses. Permitted Uses: • Educational Facilities – Indoor Instruction • College and University • Dry Cleaner and Laundry • Health Club (Indoor and Outdoor) • Personal Service Shops • Theater • Day Care – Commercial • Hotel • Night Club, bar, or tavern – with conditional use permit • Restaurant • Retail Sales and Services – limited to 15,000 square feet • Uses permitted under BP Business Park zoning • Multi-Family • Extended Care/Facility/Convalescent/Nursing Home • Mixed use structure Base Zoning and Meritorious Modifications At the time of site plan, the project will need to meet all applicable site development standards and platting requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance for the GC General Commercial zoning district, except where meritorious modifications are granted with the PDD zoning. The applicant is requesting the following meritorious modification: Allowing specific GC General Commercial land uses, multi-family, extended care/facility/convalescent/nursing home and mixed use structures, in addition to all uses allowed in BP Business Park. Community Benefits The applicant has listed the following as community benefits proposed by the development that will offset the modifications requested under the PDD Planned Development District: The additional land uses are necessary to provide all the land uses necessary to create the mixed use development desired for the BioCorridor District and to support the RELLIS campus. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the rezoning. Staff is supportive of the extension of the existing PDD onto neighboring tracts but does not support the proposal to bring any residential uses into this area. Attachments: 1. Background Information 2. Aerial & Small Area Map 3. Application 4. Rezoning Map 5. Concept Plan NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: November 16, 2017 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: December 14, 2017 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Contacts in support: None Contacts in opposition: None Inquiry contacts: None ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Business Park PDD Planned Development District Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies South (across SH 47) Business Park R Rural Single-family East Business Park R Rural Storage facilities West Business Park R Rural Vacant DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: June 1995 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon Annexation A-O Agricultural Open renamed to R Rural in 2014 R Rural to PDD Planned Development District in 2016 (approx. 5.5 acres) Final Plat: Property is unplatted Site development: Property is undeveloped along State Highway 47. The remainder is developed as storage facilities and manufacture home sites. �...,City of Coll ege Station I .... o 340 680 Ill WP 47 DEVELOPMENT & Il l Case: REZONING I NORTH Feet M-MC-J PROPERTIES REZ2017-000024 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.:________________ DATE SUBMITTED:________________ TIME: STAFF: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING)APPLICATION PLANNED DISTRICTS Cn~OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A~M Universi~ (Check one)~($1,240)Planned Development District (PDD) ~($1,240 Planned Mixed-Used Development (P-MUD) ~($340)Modification to Existing PDD or P-MUD Amendment -Planning &Zoning Commission and City Council Review Please use Concept Plan Minor Amendment Application for minor amendments as per Section 3.4J of the UDO. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~$340 -$1,240 Rezoning Application Fee. ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request. ~Fully dimensioned Rezoning Map: a.Land affected; b.Legal description of area of proposed change; C.Present zoning; d.Zoning classification of all abutting land;and e.All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. ~Written legal description of subject property (metes &bounds or lot &block of subdivision,whichever is applicable). ~Copy of the Concept Plan on 24”x36”paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO. ~Copy of the Concept Plan on 8.5’xl 1’paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO. ~The attached Concept Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off. NOTE:If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council,another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial,except with permission of the Planning &Zoning Commission. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference N/A NAME OF PROJECT M-MC-J &WP 47 Rezoning ADDRESS SH47 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot,Block,Subdivision)A002601,John H Jones (ICL),Tract 74-75-76,5.591 Acres GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY IF NOT PLATTED: SH 47 Frontage Road between Burgess Lane and Health Science Center Parkway TOTAL ACREAGE 5.59 Acres Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 7 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGERS INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Jim Jett E-mail ijett66~gmail.com Street Address 6616 Imperial Loop Suite 10 City College Station State ~Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979-571-4341 Fax Number _________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER’S INFORMATION: Name M-MC-J Partnership E-mail _________________________ Street Address 6616 Imperial Loop Suite 10 City College Station State ~Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979-764-3900 Fax Number _________________________________ OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact,i.e.project manager,potential buyer, local contact,etc.): Name Joe Shultz E-mail eng~schultzeng.com Street Address 911 Southwest Parkway East City College Station State ~Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979-764-3900 Fax Number _________________________________ This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated 6/20/2013 and recorded in Volume 11423,Page248 of the Brazos County Official Records. Existing Zoning PDD Proposed Zoning PDD-Planned Development District Present Use of Property Vacant Proposed Use of Property Business Park,General Commercial,Multi-Family Proposed Use(s)of Property for PDD, if applicable: All uses allowed for BP and the listed uses for GC and MF shown on the Concept Plan. P-MUD uses are prescribed in Section 6.2.C.Use Table of the Unified Development Ordinance. If P-MUD: Approximate percentage of residential land uses:N/A Approximate percentage of non-residential land uses: N/A REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The development of the adjacent Bio Corridor area has commenced and there will be a demand for development to support and compliment the research and manufacturing uses within the BioCorridor.Also,the RELLIS campus development will increase the demand for retail and residential land uses along the SH 47 and Fm 60 Corridor. Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 7 2.indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.If it is not,explain why the Plan is incorrect. The zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan which has this property as Business Park. 3.How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? Some of the nearby property was either developed prior to annexation and is still zoned R-Rural or zoned R and has never been developed or is zoned PPD -Bio Corridor District.This change will be compatible with the desired land uses planned for the Blo Corridor. 4.Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The property has utility service available and access to the frontage road of SH 47 and to Burgess Lane which also connects to the frontage road for vehicular access.The uses proposed will compliment the proposed uses for the Bio Corridor. 5.Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Rural zoning typically is for large lot single family residential use which is not desirable forproperty adjacent to the Bio Corridor. 6.Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Their is no marketability for the Rural zoning district as single family lot residential is not appropriate or feasible for this property. 7.List any other reasons to support this zone change. Development of the land near the BioCorridor to compliment the Bio Corridor uses and the RELLIS campus will be necessary. Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 7 8.State the purpose and intent of the proposed development. The development will provide similar uses as the BioCorridor District with some additional land uses to support the BioCorridor District and the RELLIS campus. CONCEPT PLAN SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.What is the range of future building heights? The anticipated building heights will range from 20’to 72’. The approximate height clearance elevation for this area is 400’The existing ground elevation is approximately 328. 2.Provide a general statement regarding the proposed drainage. The drainage from the site will be conveyed to stormwater detention facilities and then discharged in the TXDOT right of way or adjacent properties.The drainage systems will be in accordance with the UDO. 3.List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought. The general variations sought are for the land uses listed on the attached Concept Plan. 4.If variations are sought,please provide a list of community benefits and/or innovative design concepts to justify the request. The additional land uses are necessary to provide all the land uses necessary to create the mixed use development desired for the BioCorridor District and to support the RELLIS campus. Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 7 5.Explain how the concept plan proposal will constitute and environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area. The character of the surrounding area will be changing as the BioCorridor district develops and this plan will be in harmony with the future development of this area. 6.Explain how the proposal is in conformity with the policies,goals,and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is for this land to be Business Park which is the basis for this rezoning with the addition of land uses which will compliment the Bio Corridor and the RELLIS campus and also conform with the policies,goals and the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 7.Explain how the concept plan proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development. The development will have land uses similar to the proposed uses in the BioCorridor and for the adjacent areas and will increase the value of the adjacent land. 8.State how dwelling units shall have access to a public street if they do not front on a public street. All dwelling units will have access to a public street by an access driveway through the property on which they are located. g.State how the development has provided adequate public improvements,including,but not limited to:parks,schools, and other public facilities. No parks or schools are part of this development.The only public facilities will be utilities and possibly a street. Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 7 ~o.Explain how the concept plan proposal will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or be materially injurious to properties or irnprovements~n~evicinity. 11.Explain how the concept planproposa~will not adversely affect the safsty and con venience ~f v&hi~ul~r,bicycle,o~ pedestri~n ci~cu1ation in the~vicFnFty~including traffi~ reasonably e~cpe.ctad ta’be generated by the proposed use and other usesreesonable anticipated inthearea..cansid~ring existing zoning ~nd land uses~in thea~ea~ Please note that a “complete site plan’must be submitted to Planning &Development Services for a formal review after the “concept plan”has been approved by the City Counc~prior to the issuance of a bu~d~ng permit except for s1ngle~ farnily.dewelopment. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, cQrrect,and complete.IF TI-IIS ,APPLICA77ON IS ,IILED BY ANYONE OThER Ti-IAN TIlE OWI~JER OF ~RIE PROPERTY.This application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.if there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its b&ialf. .a1~e. ~-I’-/1 The land will be developed in accordance with the UDO to ensure it is not detrimental tothe public health,safety. welfare,and the properties or improvements in the vicinity. The ,pian wiII,prodde~v&?icu1ar,diicycie,dpedes*ian.faciiities~and~cir~4ationa texistat~this E~me.thereby it vvill not aversely affect the safety and convention of vehicular,bicycle o,rpedestrian circulation. Revised 5115 Page 6 of 7 CONCEPTUAL PDDIP-MUD SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A key map (not necessarily to scale). ~Title block to include: ~Name,address,location,and legal description. ~Name,address,and telephone number of applicant ~Name,address,and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) ~j Name,address,and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) ~Date of submittal ~Total site area ~North arrow. ~100-year floodplain and floodway (if applicable)on or adjacent to the proposed project site,note if there is none on the site. ~Show the approximate location of the following: ~Parking areas ~Building sites and an indication of their use ~Artificially lit areas ~Open spaces/conservation areas ~j Greenways ~Streets and access ~Parks ~Schools ~Trails ~Buffer areas (or a statement indicating buffering proposed) ~Other special features ~Approximate accessways,pedestrian and bikeways. ~Common and open space areas. Revised 5/15 Page 7 of 7 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.:________________ DATE SUBMITTED:_______________ TIME: STAFF: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING)APPLICATION PLANNED DISTRICTS Date of Optional Preapplication Conference N/A NAME OF PROJECT M-MC-J &WP 47 Rezoning ADDRESS SH47 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block,Subdivision)A002601,John H Jones (ICL),Tract 70,5.0 Acres,Mara MHP GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY IF NOT PLATTED: SH 47 Frontage Road between Burgess Lane and Health Science Center Parkway TOTAL ACREAGE 5.O0Acres CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M Universisy~ (Check one)~($1,240)Planned Development District (PDD) ~($1,240 Planned Mixed-Used Development (P-MUD) ~($340)Modification to Existing PDD or P-MUD Amendment -Planning &Zoning Commission and City Council Review Please use Concept Plan Minor Amendment Application for minor amendments as per Section 3.4.J of the UDO. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~$340 -$1,240 Rezoning Application Fee. ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request. ~Fully dimensioned Rezoning Map: a.Land affected; b.Legal description of area of proposed change; c.Present zoning; d.Zoning classification of all abutting land;and e.All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. ~Written legal description of subject property (metes &bounds or lot &block of subdivision,whichever is applicable). ~Copy of the Concept Plan on 24”x36” paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO. ~Copy of the Concept Plan on 8.5’xll”paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO. ~The attached Concept Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off. NOTE:If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council,another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial,except with permission of the Planning &Zoning Commission. Revised 5/15 Page 1 of7 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGERS INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Jim Jett E-mail llett66~gmail.com Street Address 6166 Imperial Loop Suite 10 City College Station State ~Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 9795714341 Fax Number _________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER’S INFORMATION: Name WP 47 Development LTD E-mail Iaura.patterson©brandt.com Street Address 8822 Burgess Ln City College Station State ~‘Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 936-394-2925 Fax Number _________________________________ OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact,i.e.project manager, potential buyer,local contact,etc.): Name Joe Shultz E-mail engt~schultzeng.com Street Address 911 Southwest Parkway East City College Station State ~‘Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 9797643900 Fax Number _________________________________ This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated 6/20/2013 and recorded in Volume 11423, Page248 of the Brazos County Official Records. Existing Zoning PDD Proposed Zoning PDD-Planned Development District Present Use of Property Vacant Proposed Use of Property Business Park,General Commercial,Multi-Family Proposed Use(s)of Property for PDD,if applicable: All uses allowed for BP and the listed uses for GC and MF shown on the Concept Plan. P-MUD uses are prescribed in Section 6.2.C.Use Table of the Unified Development Ordinance. If P-MUD: Approximate percentage of residential land uses:N/A Approximate percentage of non-residential land uses:N/A REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The development of the adjacent BioCorridor area has commenced and there will be a demand for development to support and compliment the research and manufacturing uses within the BioCorridor.Also,the RELLIS campus development will increase the demand for retail and residential land uses along the SH 47 and Fm 60 Corridor. Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 7 2.Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.If it is not,explain why the Plan is incorrect. The zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan which has this property as Business Park. 3.How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? Some of the nearby property was either developed prior to annexation and is still zoned R-Rural or zoned R and has never been developed or is zoned PPD -Bio Corridor District.This change will be compatible with the desired land uses planned for the BioCorridor. 4.Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The property has utility service available and access to the frontage road of SH 47 and to Burgess Lane which also connects to the frontage road for vehicular access.The uses proposed will compliment the proposed uses for the BioCorridor. 5.Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Rural zoning typically is for large lot single family residential use which is not desirable for property adjacent to the Bio Corridor. 6.Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Their is no marketability for the Rural zoning district as single family lot residential is not appropriate or feasible for this property. 7.List any other reasons to support this zone change. Development of the land near the BioCorridor to compliment the Bio Corridor uses and the RELLIS campus will be necessaiy.A TIA was submitted with the PDD rezoning request for this development. Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 7 8.State the purpose and intent of the proposed development. The development will provide similar uses as the BioCorridor District with some additional land uses to support the BioCorridor District and the RELLIS campus. CONCEPT PLAN SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.What is the range of future building heights? The anticipated building heights will range from 20’to 72’ The approximate height clearance elevation for this area is 400’.The existing ground elevation is approximately 328. 2.Provide a general statement regarding the proposed drainage. The drainage from the site will be conveyed to stormwater detention facilities and then discharged in the TXDOT right of way or adjacent properties.The drainage systems will be in accordance with the UDO. 3.List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought. The general variations sought are for the land uses listed on the attached Concept Plan. 4.If variations are sought,please provide a list of community benefits and/or innovative design concepts to justify the request. The additional land uses are necessary to provide all the land uses necessary to create the mixed use development desired for the BioCorridor District and to support the RELLIS campus. Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 7 5.Explain how the concept plan proposal will constitute and environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area. The character of the surrounding area will be changing as the BioCorridor district develops and this plan will be in harmony with the future development of this area. 6.Explain how the proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals,and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is for this land to be Business Park which is the basis for this rezoning with the addition of land uses which will compliment the BioCorridor and the RELLIS campus and also conform with the policies,goals and the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 7.Explain how the concept plan proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect,adjacent development. The development will have land uses similar to the proposed uses in the Bio Corridor and for the adjacent areas and will increase the value of the adjacent land. 8.State how dwelling units shall have access to a public street if they do not front on a public street. All dwelling units will have access to a public street by an access driveway through the property on which they are located. 9.State how the development has provided adequate public improvements,including,but not limited to:parks,schools, and other public facilities. No parks or schools are part of this development.The only public facilities will be utilities and possibly a street. Revised 5/15 Page 5 017 ic.Explain how the concept plan proposal will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The land will be developed in accordance with the UDO to ensure it is not detrimental to the public health,safety, welfare,and the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 11.Explain how the concept plan proposal will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular,bicycle,or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonable anticipated in the area considering existing zoning arid land uses in the area. The plan will provide vehicular, bicycle,and pedestrian facilities and circulation that don’t exist at this time thereby it will not aversely affect the safety and convention of vehicular,bicycle or pedestrian circulation. Please note that a “complete site plan”must be submitted to Planning &Development Services for a formal review after the “concept plan”has been approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit -except for single- family development. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf. _____________‘7~b7~.f 7 Date. Revised 5/15 Page 6 of 7 CONCEPTUAL PDDIP-MUD SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A key map (not necessarily to scale). ~Title block to include: ~Name,address,location,and legal description. ~Name,address,and telephone number of applicant ~Name,address,and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) ~Name,address,and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) ~J Date of submittal ~Total site area ~j North arrow. ~100-year floodplain and floodway (if applicable)on or adjacent to the proposed project site,note if there is none on the site. ~Show the approximate location of the following: ~J Parking areas ~Building sites and an indication of their use ~j Artificially lit areas ~Open spaces/conservation areas ~j Greenways ~Streets and access ~Parks ~Schools ~Trails ~Buffer areas (or a statement indicating buffering proposed) ~Other special features ~Approximate accessways,pedestrian and bikeways. ~Common and open space areas. Revised 5/15 _________________Page 7 of 7 STATE HIGHWAY 47 BURGESS LANE BIOMEDICAL WAY STA T E HI G H W A Y 4 7 TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: ZONING MAP WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD AND M-MC-J PROPERTIES 11.13 ACRES JOHN H. JONES LEAGUE, A-26 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE: 1"-50 AUGUST 2017 OWNER/DEVELOPER: M-MC-J PROPERTIES 6166 IMPERIAL LOOP SUITE 10 COLLEGE STAION, TX 77845 (979) 571-4341 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE STA T E H I G H W A Y 4 7 B U R G E S S L A N E FM 60 OWNER: WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD 8822 BURGESS LN COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 STATE HIGHWAY 47 BURGESS LANE BIOMEDICAL WAY STAT E H I G H W A Y 4 7 TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE: 1"-50 NOVEMBER 2017 OWNER/DEVELOPER: M-MC-J PROPERTIES 6166 IMPERIAL LOOP SUITE 10 COLLEGE STAION, TX 77845 (979) 571-4341 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE STA T E H I G H W A Y 4 7 B U R G E S S L A N E FM 60 OWNER: WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD 8822 BURGESS LN COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 CONCEPT PLAN WP 47 DEVELOPMENT LTD AND M-MC-J PROPERTIES 11.13 ACRES JOHN H. JONES LEAGUE, A-26 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS November 16, 2017 Regular Agenda Rezoning – Jackson Hole Phase 1 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Alaina Helton, Senior Planner, Planning & Development Services Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix “A”, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 2.2 acres being a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Jackson Estates, Phase One, and being generally located at 3747 Rock Prairie Road West. Case #REZ2017-000026 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the December 14th City Council Meeting- Subject to change.) Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the PDD Planned Development District zoning request and associated Concept Plan and Landscape Plan. Summary: This request is to modify the Concept Plan, more specifically the 0.8 acre “preserve area” in order to mitigate unpermitted clearing and grading that took place in this area. A supplemental Landscape Plan that provides for additional plantings in the “preserve area” is attached and will be adopted as part of the Concept Plan. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as Suburban Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The existing PDD Planned Development District zoning uses a base zoning of GC General Commercial with modifications to the GC standards to make the PDD zoning similar to the character of the SC Suburban Commercial district. The only changes requested with this rezoning request are to the Concept Plan’s “preserve area” to mitigate unpermitted clearing and grading that took place on the property, with a supplemental Landscape Plan that provides for additional plantings in this area. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The modification request to mitigate unpermitted clearing and grading seeks to improve the subject property’s compatibility with nearby properties compared to present existing conditions. Property located to the east across Holleman Drive South is currently developed as a manufactured home park in the ETJ. The City does have zoning or land use control in the ETJ. Adjacent to the west and south is the Jackson Hole Driving Range – developed as a permitted use in the R Rural zoning district. When the driving range developed, a little over 300 feet along Rock Prairie Road West was left for future development. To the north, across Rock Prairie Road West, a site plan was recently approved for an elementary school and a preliminary plan is under review for Mission Ranch, a Restricted Suburban single-family subdivision. The PDD is a compatible fit as a transitional use between the surrounding existing developments (i.e., Jackson Hole Driving Range and the Rolling Ridge Manufactured Home Community). The current PDD proposal retains its entitled GC General Commercial and SC Suburban Commercial land uses which includes Suburban Commercial–type elements that are compatible with the surrounding residential and future RS Restricted Suburban subdivision. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the districts that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The subject property is the remaining undeveloped portion of Jackson Hole Estates. In 2015, City Council approved the rezoning from SC Suburban Commercial to PDD Planned Development for this property. The approved Concept Plan proposed an 0.8 acre “preserve area” to be kept in its natural state that runs parallel to Holleman Drive South. This “preserve area” was meant to act as a buffer for the manufactured home community located across Holleman Drive South, and to minimize the intensity of the proposed commercial development. Recently, 0.31 acres of this “preserve area” was disturbed and several trees and bushes were removed, as depicted on the updated Concept Plan. The applicant is now proposing to amend the Concept Plan to propose additional plantings to mitigate the landscaping that was removed from the “preserve area”. The applicant has presented a Landscape Plan prepared and sealed by a Landscape Architect that proposes native canopy trees and shrubs to reforest this area. Staff has reviewed this plan and finds that the proposed landscaping is adequate and will help restore this area to its previous state once the landscaping is fully mature. 4. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: Located against an existing commercial use and thoroughfare, the subject tract is marketable for commercial uses. The existing zoning district allows for commercial uses that cater both to nearby residents and to the larger community. 5. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water service will be provided by the Wellborn Special Utilities District via existing 12-inch water lines located along Rock Prairie Road West and Holleman Drive South. A fire flow analysis meeting minimum requirements of the BCS Unified Design Guidelines will need to be submitted and approved prior to a final plat being forwarded to the Planning & Zoning Commission. There are currently no existing sanitary sewer mains available to serve this property, so an On-Site Sewer Facility (septic system) will be required to sewer the lot. The septic system must be installed and maintained in accordance with Brazos County Health Department regulations. Drainage is generally to the south within Hope’s Creek Drainage Basin. There is no FEMA regulated floodplain identified on the tract. The development will be required to comply with the City’s drainage ordinance. A traffic impact analysis will be required with the site plan application to determine the full impacts of this site. REVIEW OF CONEPT PLAN The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed land uses as well as access points external and internal to the property. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD Concept Plans: 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. General: This request is to rezone approximately 2.2 acres from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning of GC General Commercial. The only concept plan modification in this rezoning request is to propose additional landscaping to reforest 0.31 acres of the disturbed “preserve area” (0.8 acres), as shown on the updated Concept Plan and associated Landscape Plan. Remaining unchanged from the previously approved rezoning, the PDD and Concept Plan includes an approximate 8,000 square foot primary structure with 50% of the building intended for fuel sales/convenience store use with a fuel canopy on the property. The remaining 50% of the building will be reserved for uses permitted in SC Suburban Commercial. A maximum of four (4) dispensers (8 vehicle spaces) is permitted for in relation to the fuel sales/convenience store. Additional Standards and Community Benefits of the current PDD include:  Buffer yards of 25’ wide and 20’ wide along the west and south property lines respectively;  Approximate 0.80 acre “preserve area” located within the property’s northwest corner to provide for natural buffer and screening. Minor underbrush clearing will be permitted;  No freestanding signs. Low-Profile monument signs only, located at each driveway entrance, will be permitted (4’ maximum height including company logo and digital display of fuel sale prices);  Site lighting restricted to 20’ maximum height and utilize LED directional lights;  Suburban Commercial requirements will be used for the roof, architectural standards and mechanical equipment screening. Modification Requested: Propose additional landscaping to reforest 0.31 acres of the disturbed “preserve area” (0.8 acres), as shown on the updated Concept Plan and associated Landscape Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the PDD Planned Development District zoning request and associated Concept Plan and Landscape Plan. Attachments: 1. Background Information 2. Vicinity, Small Area Map & Aerial 3. Application 4. Rezoning Map 5. Concept Plan 6. Landscape Plan 7. Site Photos NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: November 16, 2017 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: December 14, 2017 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Property owner notices mailed: Six (6) Contacts in support: None Contacts in opposition: None Inquiry contacts: Six (6) at the time of staff report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North (Across Rock Prairie Road West) Restricted Suburban RS Restricted Suburban Vacant (Site Plan for Elementary School and Preliminary Plan for Restricted Suburban) South Restricted Suburban R Rural Vacant East (Across Holleman Drive South) Urban N/A (ETJ) Manufactured Home Park West Restricted Suburban R Rural Driving Range DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: March 2008 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation (2008) Renamed R Rural (2013) SC Suburban Commercial (2015) PDD Planned Development District (2015) Final Plat: Jackson Estates Phase One Subdivision (2010) Site development: Property is not developed I VICINITY MAP I \ --< � ,. �� \ , ,# , I I ·>:' .. , '� , ' \ \ ' ' ' «' tl ' q ' "· • u ' \ ... .. . ! ' \ "'' ,. "' /,pi « � ' ; , ,. , , ,� r ' ' l I I I I ' I , ' \ \ \ l I I I I I I I I I I I I I --�------------ - -- - �-: . t' 1·�'i lo 0.75 1.5 3M;1es1 II: , � Ir I& proct.r oi I& 3)r ritorma,�na I purposes a:tCI m�; no: nave been pEparelJ tor or te 01J r.ab1e tor iega I. en�ee �or survey� pu�oses, ll!O'oes n«-reere:.amaa o�e.gf'C'JnO s:irvey and �esen.oon.�:k appoxrna'1!\e1a"1e IOca'<� o �p ro pe J;:;oUoioarle'S� • wa r ta-1 '' 1&ma oe b u e er. o t CO J S!0:c n Ct'I s..:re c n: �ura C' o r oom Je tenes.s. -1 1 � I 1-\....L. V' .... City of College Station ZONI NG DIST RI C T S O n Gray sca le ) Residential MU Mixed-Use R Rura l MHP M anu factored Home Pk. E Estate RS Restricted Suburban GS G enera l Subu rban D Duplex T Tov,nhome MF Multi .fa mi ly 0 N on-Re sid en tia I NAP Natural Area Protected O Office SC Suburban Commercia l GC Ge neral Commer cia l 600 1,200 Cl Commercial Ind ustria l BP Business P ark BP I Business Park Industrial C-U College and Uni versity Plann ed District s P-MU O P la nned Mixed-Use Dist. POD Planned Develop Dist Desian Di strict s WPC Wolf Pen Creek De v. Cor. NG-1 Core Northgate NG-2 Transi tional North gate NG-3 Residential Northg ate 16 Feet 11 JACKSON HOLE PH 1 WI LLOW /:S1 O verlay Districts OV Co rri dor O vr. - ROD Redevelopment District KO Krenek Tap Ovr. NPO Nbrhd . P revailing O vr. NCO Nbrhd. Conservation Ovr. HP H istoric P reservation 0 vr. : : REZ2017-000026 I l e a s e : WI LLOW RUN PH 2 -200 FT N o tification Reti re d Di st ricts R-1 B Si ngle Fa mily Resid en tia l R4 Multi� a mity R-6 High Density M ult�Family RD Research and Dev. M-1 Light Ind ustrial M-2 Heavy Ind ustria l REZONING I V' .... City of College Station 0 1,200 -----=====::::iFeet 600 JACKSON HOLE PH 1 I lease: REZ2017-000026 REZONING I JACKSON HOLE PH1 (REZ2017-000026) 3747 ROCK PRAIRIE RD W; JACKSON ESTATES Total Acreage:2.229 Existing Zoning:PDD Date Deeded to Owner:October 30, 2014 Proposed Zoning: Deed Recording:Volume 12351, Page 234 Present Use:Vacant PAC Meeting Date:8/2/2017 12:00:00 AM Proposed Use: [P58_PROPOSEDUSE Additional Properties: AREA CONDITIONS Same as original submission. Site currently zoned for a convenience store with fuel pumps. Proposed use is not changing. Requested changes are limited to additional landscaping in the buffer area. COMPATIBILITY Same as original submission.Suburban Commercial would be ideal at the "hard" corner of Rock Prairie Road West and Holleman Drive. Also this type of development is a compatible fit for transitional uses between the surrounding existing developments (i.e. driving range and manufactured home community). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Yes. REZONING SUITABILITY APPLICANT:RME Consulting Engineers OWNER:Texas KJ Investments LLC PDD Same as original submission.This type of development is a compatible fit for transitional uses between the surrounding existing developments (i.e. driving range and manufactured home community). CURRENT SUITABILITY Same as original submission.The "light" commercial uses (i.e. Jackson Hole Driving Range & this subject development) will provide reasonable transitional uses to the Restricted Residential on the north side of Rock Prairie Road West. PROPERTY MARKETABILITY Same as original submission.N/A OTHER REASONS Same as original submission.Existing land features help to provide a desirable Suburban Commercial development. These desirable conditions are as follows: (1) The existing creek traverses the property and is parallel to Holleman Drive. This natural feature will provide an approx.. 120' wide buffer with the "adjacent" manufactured home community. (2) USACE restrictions will minimize disturbance to the existing tributary. (3) These natural features will minimize the intensity of the Suburban Commercial Development. (4) The "light" commercial uses (i.e. Jackson Hole Driving Range & this subject development) will provide reasonable transitional uses to the Restricted Residential on the north side of Rock Prairie Road West. BUILDING HEIGHTS Same as original submission.Less than 30'. PROPOSED DRAINAGE Same as original application. Site development of this tract will require a floodplain model (for purposes of "better data") to ensure proper drainage. Additional detention will be provided to adequately discharge site runoff to pre-development runoff rates. VARIATIONS SOUGHT Same as original submission. See attached PDD Zoning and Concept Map Document. Proposed uses is not changing. Requested changes are limited to additional landscaping in the buffer area COMMUNITY BENEFITS Same as original submission. See Attached PDD Zoning and Concept Plan document. SUSTAINED STABILITY Same as original submission. Multiple buffering, screening and other development restrictions have been added to the PDD Concept Plan to help minimize a "commercial" feel to the surrounding community. Also, the CG Usage has been limited to 50% of the proposed building. Orientation of the structure, and fuel canopy, was considered to help minimize commercial visual impacts. Thus it is believe that these efforts will maintain the "spirit" of a SC Type development yet allow for GC fuel pumps at the C-store. CONFORMITY No changes to the proposed uses. Requested changes include additional landscaping in the buffer area. COMPATIBILITY WITH USE Same as original submission. Coupled with proposed Concept Plan restrictions the existing land features help to provide a desirable Commercial development. These desirable conditions are as follows: (1) The existing creek traverses the property and is parallel to Holleman Drive. This natural feature will provide an approx. 120' wide buffer with the "adjacent" manufactured home community. (2) USACE restrictions will minimize disturbance to the existing tributary. (3) These natural features will minimize the intensity of the Commercial development. (4) The "light" commercial uses (i.e. Jackson Hole Driving Range & this subject development) will provide reasonable transitional uses to the Restricted Residential on the north side of RPRW. ACCESS TO STREETS Right-in and right-out access will be provided via Rock Prairie Road West and Holleman Road. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Same as original submission. Not applicable. PUBLIC HEALTH Same as original submission. The existing creek traverses the property and is parallel to Holleman Drive. This natural feature will provide an approx. 120' wide buffer with the "adjacent" manufactured home community. SAFETY N/A. View along Rock Prairie West: Pre-Clearing View along Rock Prairie West: Post-Clearing View at corner of Rock Prairie West and Holleman Road: Pre-Clearing View at corner of Rock Prairie West and Holleman Road: Post-Clearing 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Lance Simms, Director of Planning & Development Services DATE: 16 November 2017 SUBJECT: UDO Amendments – Preliminary Plans Item Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 2.2 “Planning & Zoning Commission”, Section 2.8 “Administrator”, Section 2.12 “Summary of Review Authority”, Section 3.2 “General Approval Procedures”, and Section 3.4 “Plat Review” related to the review authority and processing of preliminary plans. Background This item originated with the 2017 P&Z Plan-of-Work and helps streamline the development review process by allowing Preliminary Plans to be approved administratively unless the applicant is seeking a waiver or discretionary item. On 30 August, staff hosted two public meetings to solicit feedback on proposed changes to the UDO, including preliminary plans. On 21 September, staff briefed the Commission on the results of the public meetings and received direction to move forward with the changes outlined in the attached documents. The City Council is scheduled to take final action on this item at their 14 December meeting. Attachment 1. Redlines of affected UDO Sections Sec. 12-2.2.D – Powers and Duties. D. Powers and Duties. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the following powers and duties: 1. Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make recommendations for the effective coordination of the various City departments, committees, and boards, in implementing the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Recommendations. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review and make recommendations to the City Council subject to the terms and conditions set forth for such uses in this UDO for the following: a. Conditional use permits; b. Zoning map amendments (rezoning); c. Concept Plans for Planned Development Districts (PDD) and Planned Mixed-Use Districts (P-MUD); d. Text amendments; e. Comprehensive Plan amendments; f. Impact fee land use decisions; g. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) priorities; h. Annexations; and i. Petitions to form a Municipal Utility District. 3. Final Action. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hear and take final action on the following: a. Applicable appeals of decisions of the Design Review Board; b. Preliminary plans not approved by staff as set forth in the Plat Review Section in Article 3.4 of this UDO; c , fFinal plats, replats, development plats, and minor plats not approved by staff as set forth in the Plat Review Section in Chapter 12, Article 3.4 of this UDO; dc. Waivers of the standards in Chapter 12, Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements; ed. Development exaction appeal; fe. Appeal of the Administrator's denial of a final minor or amending plat; gf. Appeal of the Administrator's determination regarding applicability of plat requirements; hg. Appeal of the Administrator's denial to amend the color palette for Northgate roof colors; ih. Appeal of the Administrator's denial of an alternative parking plan; and ji. Appeal of the Administrator's interpretation of the provisions of Chapter 12, Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements. Sec. 12-2.8. - Administrator. A. Designation. The City Manager shall designate the Administrator for the City of College Station. Where this UDO assigns a responsibility, power, or duty to the Administrator, the Administrator may delegate that responsibility, power, or duty to any other agent or employee of the City whom the Administrator may reasonably determine. B. Powers and Duties. The Administrator shall have the following powers and duties: 1. Administration and Enforcement. The Administrator shall administer and enforce the provisions of this UDO. 2. Interpretation. The Administrator is responsible for interpreting the provisions of this UDO. The Administrator shall make written interpretations of this UDO when requested, setting forth the reasons and explanation therefore. 3. Building Permits. The Administrator shall review and certify that the proposed construction, moving, alteration, or use of the land either does or does not comply with the provisions of this UDO prior to issuance of a Building Permit by the Building Official. 4. Final Action. The Administrator shall review and take final action on the following: a. Sign permits; b. Site plans (not Wolf Pen Creek District site plans); c. Architectural reviews; d. Administrative adjustments; e Preliminary Plans as set forth in Section 3.4, Plat Review, of this UDO; fe. Minor and amending plats; gf. Determination of building plot (Section 12-7.2, General Provisions); hg. Minor Wolf Pen Creek District projects; ih. Amendments to the color palette for Northgate roof colors; ji. Certificate of Appropriateness Routine Maintenance Work reviews; kj. Determination regarding applicability of plat requirements; and lk. Alternative parking plans (Section 12-7.3, Off-Street Parking). 5. Other Duties. a. The Administrator, or his designee, shall serve as the Historic Preservation Officer (HPO) for the City of College Station. As such, the HPO shall serve as a representative of the Landmark Commission and shall be responsible for coordinating the Landmark Commission's preservation activities with the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee, those of state and federal agencies, and with local, state, and national nonprofit preservation organizations. b. The Administrator shall perform other duties imposed under the provisions of the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, as amended from time-to-time. c. The Administrator shall administer and enforce the regulations of the Easterwood Field Airport Zoning Ordinance. Sec. 12-2.12. Summary of Review Authority. The following table summarizes the authority of the various review bodies and staff. PROCEDURE City Council P&Z Comm. Zoning Bd. of Adj. Design Rev. Bd. Land. Comm. Bike, Ped. & Grnwy Admin. Building Official Dev. Engr. CITY COUNCIL (CC) Oversize Participation D RR Development Agreement D RR R Conditional Use permit D R RR Zoning Map Amendment D R RR Zoning Map Amendment (HP) D R R RR PDD/P-MUD Concept Plan D R RR Text Amendment D R R RR Comp. Plan Amendment D R R RR Impact Fee/CIP Priorities D R R RR Annexations D R RR Municipal Utility Districts D R RR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) Preliminary Plan*** (with waiver or discretionary item) D RR R Final Plat D RR R Development Plat D RR R Waiver of Subdivision Standard D RR R Development Exaction Appeal A D RR ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (ZBA) Variance D RR R RR Administrative Appeal D RR Zoning Map Interpretation D RR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD (DRB) WPC District Site Plan A D RR R WPC District Building/Sign Review A D RR WPC Parking Waivers A D RR NG Waivers D RR Non-Residential Arch. Stand. Waiver D RR Non-Residential Arch. Stand. Alt. Compliance D RR LANDMARK COMMISSION (LC) Certificates of Appropriateness A D RR Certificates of Demolition A D RR ADMINISTRATOR Architectural Reviews D Interpretation A** A D Sign Permit A D Site Plan A A* D R Administrative Adjustment A D WPC District Building or Sign, Minor A D Preliminary Plan*** D R Minor or Amending Plat A D R PD Concept Plan Minor Amend. A D Certificate of Appropriateness, Routine A D NG Roof Color Palette Amendment A D Alternative Parking Plans A D Determination of Plat Applicability A D R BUILDING OFFICIAL (BO) Building Permit D Certificate of Occupancy R D R Certificate of Completion R D R DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER (DE) Development Permit D Driveway Application A D Alternative Const. Material A D * Section 12-3.6.E. Site Plan Review Criteria and 12-3.7.E. Wolf Pen Creek Design District General Site Plan Review Criteria only. ** Subdivision Regulations only. *** See UDO Section 3.4, Plat Review, for specific review authority. KEY: A =Appeal R =Recommend D =Final Action/Decision RR =Review/Report Sec. 12-3.2.H – Simultaneous Processing of Applications H. Simultaneous Processing of Applications. Two (2) or more forms of review and approval are typically required in the development process. Development proposals that require applications for Zoning Map Amendments (Rezoning) are required to be acted upon by the City Council before plat and other development applications will be accepted for review by the City. In addition, Preliminary Plans are to be acted upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Administrator before a subsequent Final Plat will be accepted for review by the City. At the discretion of the Administrator, plat and other applications for development approvals may be processed simultaneously, so long as the approval procedures for each individual application can be completed pursuant to the requirements of this UDO. Such processing shall occur at the applicant's own risk. Sec. 12-3.4.C. “Application Requirements”, 3.4.D. “Filing of Plat”, 3.4.E. “Review Procedure”, and 3.4.F., “Waivers” C. Application Requirements. 1. Preapplication Conference. Prior to the submission of a preliminary plan or a plat application required by this UDO, applicants are encouraged to schedule and attend an optional preapplication conference in accordance with and for the purposes set forth elsewhere in this UDO for preapplication conferences. 2. A complete application for review shall be submitted to the Administrator including payment of a fee as set forth in this UDO. Upon request, all preliminary plans and all plats shall be submitted in an electronic form acceptable to the Administrator and compatible with the City's Geographic Information System (GIS). The signatures of all owners of land within the boundary of the preliminary plan or the plat shall be required on the application. A representative of an owner may sign the application provided a written letter of agency is provided to the City with the application. If the property owner is not an individual but an entity (e.g., business or trust), the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the individual to sign on behalf of the entity. 3. When required to submit the following, the applications shall comply with and/or show the following information: a. Preliminary Plans . When submitting preliminary plans, the following information is required: 1) The preliminary plan shall conform to the general requirements of this UDO and minimum standards of design and improvements as set forth in Chapter 12, Article 8 Subdivision Design and Improvements; 2) Provide the preliminary plan on sheets twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six (36) inches to a scale of one hundred (100) feet per inch or larger. Smaller scales may be allowed at the discretion of the Administrator. If more than one (1) sheet, provide an index sheet at a scale of five hundred (500) feet per inch or larger; 32) The words "PRELIMINARY PLAN - NOT FOR RECORD" shall appear on the plan in letters one-half (½) inch high; 4) The date the preliminary plan was submitted and the dates of any revisions shall legibly appear on the plan; 53) The proposed name of the subdivision or development, which shall not have the same spelling as or be pronounced similar to the name of any other subdivision located within the county it is located; 64) The name and address of all property owners, developers and subdividers, engineers, and surveyors; 75) Description by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within accepted land survey standards (labeled on boundary lines, not separate metes and bounds description). The legal description by metes and bounds of the subdivision or development which shall close within accepted land survey standards. An accurate location of the subdivision or development shall be provided by reference to an established survey or league corner, City of College Station horizontal control monument, subdivision corner, or other known point. Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control point, to which, later, all dimensions, angles, bearings, block numbers, and similar data shall be referred. The preliminary plan shall be located with respect to a corner of the survey or tract, or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part; Commented [LS1]: See language on application 86) Subdivision boundary lines shall be indicated by heavy lines and the computed acreage of the subdivision or development shown; 97) Indicate whether the contiguous property is platted and provide the name of all contiguous subdivisions or The name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous, unplatted parcels, and an indication whether or not contiguous properties are platted; 108) The following existing features shall be shown: (a) The location, dimension, name and description of all recorded streets, alleys, reservations, easements, or other public or private rights-of-way within the subdivision or development, intersecting or contiguous with its boundaries or forming such boundaries. In the case of pipelines carrying flammable gas or fuel, the approximate location, size of line, design pressure and product transported through the line shall be shown; (b) The location, dimension, description and name of all existing or recorded lots, parks, public areas, permanent structures and other sites within or contiguous with the subdivision or development; (c) The location, dimensions, description, and flow line of existing watercourses and drainage structures within the subdivision, development or contiguous thereto; (d) The location of the one hundred-year floodplain according to the most recent best available data; 119) Date of preparation, scale in feet, and north arrow; 1210) Topographic information, including contours at two-foot intervals, flow line elevation of streams, and wooded areas; 1311) The location, approximate dimensions, description and name of all proposed streets, alleys, drainage structures, parks, or other public areas, easements, or other rights-of-way, blocks, lots, and other sites within the subdivision or development. Proposed channel cross sections, if any. Existing and/or proposed well site locations; 1412) A number or letter to identify each lot and each block. Lots and blocks shown on a preliminary plan should be numbered sequentially; 1513) Location of current City limits line, and current zoning district boundaries; 1614) Vicinity map which shows general location of subject property to existing streets in College Station and to its City limits. No scale is required but a north arrow is to be included; 1715) Show number of residential lots and average lot size when applicable; 1816) Provide a note to identify a Cluster Subdivision when applicable; 1917) Provide any oversize participation requests that will be sought; 2018) Provide title report for property that is current within ninety (90) days and includes applicable information such as ownership, liens, encumbrances, etc; 2119) Written requests for waivers of subdivision standards, if any, shall be submitted in accordance with the applicable Sections of this UDO; 22) Eleven-inch by seventeen-inch copies of the preliminary plan (not necessarily to scale) will be requested by the Administrator when the preliminary plan has been reviewed and has the potential to be scheduled for a Planning and Zoning Commission meetin g for consideration; and 203) Provide a note on the Preliminary Plan to identify the Residential Parking Option chosen from the Single-Family Residential Parking Requirements for Platting when applicable ; and. 214) As applicable, applicants shall submit the information, documents, and materials set forth in the Traffic Impact Analysis Section in Chapter 12, Article 7 of this UDO. b. Final Plats and Other Plats to be Recorded. When submitting Final Plats, Replats, Minor Plats, Amending Plats, Vacating Plats, and Development Plats, the following shall be required: 1) The plat shall conform to the general requirements of this UDO and minimum standards of design and improvements as set forth in Chapter 12, Article 8 Subdivision Design and Improvements unless expressly provided for otherwise; 2) Prior to filing a plat for record, provide current certified tax certificates from all taxing agencies showing payment of all ad valorem taxes on the land within the subdivision; 3) Provide title report for property that is current within ninety (90) days and includes applicable information such as ownership, liens, encumbrances, etc; 4) Provide the plat on sheets twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six (36) inches to a scale of one hundred (100) feet per inch or larger. Smaller scales may be allowed at the discretion of the Administrator. If more than one (1) sheet, provide an index sheet at a scale of five hundred (500) feet per inch or larger; 5) Vicinity map which shows general location of subject property to existing streets in College Station and to its City limits. No scale is required but a north arrow is to be included; 6) The proposed name of the subdivision or development, which shall not have the same spelling as or be pronounced similar to the name of any other subdivision located within the county it is located; 7) Date of preparation, scale in feet, and north arrow; 8) The name and address of all property owners, developers, subdividers, engineers, and surveyors responsible for the plat; 9) Subdivision boundary lines shall be indicated by heavy lines and the computed acreage of the subdivision or development shown; 10) For a replat where there are existing improvements, provide a survey of the subject property showing the improvements to ensure that no setback encroachments are created; 11) The name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous parcels, and an indication whether or not contiguous properties are platted; 12) The location of the one hundred-year floodplain and floodway according to the most recent best available data; 13) A number or letter to identify each lot and each block. Lots and blocks shown on a plat should be numbered sequentially; 14) Provide the number of lots and average lot size when applicable; 15) Provide a note to identify a Cluster Subdivision when applicable; 16) Written requests for waivers of subdivision standards, if any, shall be submitted in accordance with the applicable Sections of this UDO; 17) The Plat shall also include the following, based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers: (a) The exact location, dimensions, name, and legal description of all existing or recorded streets, alleys, easements, or other rights-of-way within the subdivision or development, intersecting or contiguous with the boundary or forming such a boundary with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance, and length of all curves, where applicable; (b) The exact location, dimensions, description, and name of all proposed streets, alleys, drainage structures, parks, and other public areas, easements, or other rights-of-way, blocks, lots, and other sites within the subdivision or development, with accurate dimensions, bearings, or deflection angles and radii, areas, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance, and length of curves, where applicable; (c) Lot corner markers and survey monuments shall be shown clearly by symbol, and clearly tied to City of College Station horizontal control monuments; (d) The following, when applicable, shall appear on the face of the plat: (See examples in Chapter 12, Article 8 Subdivision Design and Improvements.) i. Certificate of Ownership and Dedication; ii. Certificate of Surveyor and/or Engineer; iii. Certificate of City Engineer; iv. Certificate of Planning and Zoning Commission; v. Certificate of the County Clerk; vi. Certificate of City Planner; and vii. Certificate of Approval. 18) The plat shall be accompanied by the construction documents and reports as prescribed below and bearing the seal and signature of a registered professional engineer. All shall be in accordance with the Bryan/College Station Unified Design Guidelines and the Bryan/College Station Unified Technical Specifications and shall include the following: (a) Construction plans shall be provided on twenty-four-inch by thirty-six-inch sheets; (b) Street, alley, and sidewalk plans, profiles, and sections, with specifications and detail cost estimates; (c) Sanitary sewer plan with contours, plan and profile lines, showing depth and grades, with sewer report and detailed cost estimates; (d) Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc., with specifications and water report and a detailed cost estimate. This may be combined with related information supplied for preliminary plan submissions; (e) Storm drainage system plan with contours, street lines, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels with profiles and sections. Detail drainage structure design and channel lining design if used, with specifications, drainage report, and detailed cost estimate; (f) Street lighting plan showing location of lights, design, and with specifications and detailed cost estimates; and (g) Any associated necessary items, including but not limited to off-site public utility easements, permits or approval of governmental agencies. 19) Eleven-inch by seventeen-inch copies of the plat (not necessarily to scale) will be requested by the Administrator when the plat has been reviewed and has the potential to be scheduled for a Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for consideration; 20) Provide a note on the Final Plat to identify the Residential Parking Option chosen from the Single-Family Residential Parking Requirements for Platting when applicable. D. Filing of Plat. For the purposes of this Section, the date of filing shall be determined as the date on which a complete application, as determined by the Administrator, and a plat meeting all of the technical terms and conditions of this UDO, or has filed a waiver request to those Sections for which the plat does not comply, is submitted. Once a complete application has been filed with the City, it will be scheduled for action by the Administrator and/or the Planning and Zoning Commission, as applicable. E. Review Procedure. 1. Preliminary Plan Review. a. Review and Approval Recommendation by the Administrator. 1) If a waiver or discretionary item is not included or required with the Preliminary Plan application, T the Administrator may review and approve the application. The Administrator shall review the Preliminary Plan application for compliance with the following elements: (a) City's Comprehensive Plan including but not limited to the Land Use Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Utility Master Plans, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan, Sidewalk Master Plan; (b) Existing zoning of the property, if applicable; (c) Chapter 12,Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements; (d) Form and content as required in the Application Requirements Section of this UDO; (e) If phased, the Preliminary Plan must demonstrate sufficiency and viability of public infrastructure for each phase such that an undue burden is not placed on any particular phase. In addition, the proposed phasing is not to create phases or potential remainders of a size, shape or location so as not to be developable in compliance with this UDO; and (f) Other provisions of this UDO as applicable. 2) The applicant will be advised of the date set for Planning and Zoning Commission consideration. 23) The Administrator shall recommend approve or al, approval with conditions, or disapproveal of the same based on compliance with the elements listed above. b. Review and Recommendation by Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board shall review the Preliminary Plan application for compliance with the parkland dedication requirements of Chapter 12, Article 8, Subdivision Design and improvements and recommend approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval of the same. This recommendation must be considered by the Administrator or the Planning and Zoning Commission in its review. Once the Board has determined compliance, the Preliminary Plan and subsequent plats may proceed directly to the Administrator or the Planning and Zoning Commission. c. Criteria for ApprovalConsideration by Planning and Zoning Commission. If a Preliminary Plan application includes one or more waiver requests or discretionary items, Tthe Administrator shall forward the Preliminary Plan to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration when it meets all of the technical terms and conditions of this UDO. Proposed parkland dedication equal to or exceeding five (5) acres and dedications of floodplain or greenway not previously considered by the Planning & Zoning Commission shall be considered discretionary items. The Administrator shall provide a recommendation on the , or has filed a waiver request(s) or discretionary item(s) as appropriate. to those sections for which the Preliminary Plan does not comply. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall receive the recommendations of the Administrator and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and shall approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve the Preliminary Plan with modifications based on compliance with the same elements listed in the Review and Recommendation by Administrator. Conditions of approval must entail corrections, changes, or completion of items that are ministerial in nature and explicitly spelled out. d. Effect of Approval. Approval of a Preliminary Plan shall mean the following: 1) Approval of a Preliminary Plan application by the Administrator or the Planning and Zoning Commission shall allow the applicant to continue the subdivision process by submitting a Development Permit application with construction plans and a Final Plat application. 2) Approval of a Preliminary Plan shall not constitute approval of a Final Plat. Application for approval of a Final Plat will be considered only after the requirements for Preliminary Plan approval as specified herein have been fulfilled and after all other specified conditions have been met. 3) If a Final Plat is not filed with the City within twenty-four (24) months of the date of approval or conditional approval of a Preliminary Plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission may, upon written application of the applicant, extend the approval for a one-time additional twelve-month period. The request for consideration of an extension shall be submitted to the Administrator at least thirty (30) days before the Preliminary Plan approval expires. 4) Each Final Plat which is a phase of an approved Preliminary Plan shall extend the expiration date of the Preliminary Plan an additional two (2) years from the date the Final Plat was approved by the Commission. 5) If a Preliminary Plan is phased, Final Plats shall only be permitted to proceed to the Planning and Zoning Commission in the numerical order set forth on the Preliminary Plan. 2. Amendments to an Approved Preliminary Plan. a. Minor Amendments. Minor amendments of an approved Preliminary Plan may be incorporated in an application for approval of a Final Plat without the necessity of filing a new application for approval of a Preliminary Plan. Minor amendments may include adjustment in street or alley alignments and lengths, phasing, adjustment in lot lines that do not result in creation of additional developable lots, or adjustments to utility or access easements. Minor amendments shall comply with the standards of this UDO, shall not alter a subdivision standard that is discretionary to the Commission, or shall not increase the extent of an approved waiver to a subdivision standard. b. Major Amendments. All other proposed amendments of an approved Preliminary Plan not constituting a minor amendment shall be considered a major amendment and require the approval of a new Preliminary Plan application by the Administrator or the Commission, as appropriate. Major amendments include but are not limited to an increase in the number of developable lots, rerouting of streets, addition or deletion of alleys, change to thoroughfare street layout, or modification to parkland. c. Amendment Determination. The applicant shall provide a written description of proposed amendments to an approved Preliminary Plan. The Administrator shall make the determination of whether the proposed amendments are deemed minor or major amendments. At the discretion of the Administrator, a new Preliminary Plan application that proposes major amendments may be processed simultaneously with a Final Plat application. d. Retaining Previous Approval. If the proposed major amendments are not approved or if the applicant is unwilling to accept the terms and conditions required by the Administrator or the Commission, the applicant may withdraw the proposed amendments by written request and retain the previously approved Preliminary Plan. 3. Final Plat, Replat, Vacating Plat, and Development Plat Review. a. Review and Recommendation by Administrator. 1) The Administrator shall review the plat application for compliance with the elements: (a) The approved Preliminary Plan, if applicable; (b) City's Comprehensive Plan including but not limited to the Land Use Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Utility Master Plans, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan, Sidewalk Master Plan ; (c) Existing zoning of the property, if applicable; (d) Chapter 12, Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements; (e) Form and content as required in the Application Requirements Section of this UDO; and (f) Other provisions of this UDO as applicable. 2) If public infrastructure is required for the plat, the following is required in order for the plat application to be complete to be scheduled for Planning and Zoning Commission consideration: (a) The construction documents must be approved by the City Engineer; (b) Any necessary off-site easements are reviewed and acceptable by the City in recordable form; and (c) Either the public infrastructure is constructed by the applicant and accepted by the City, or a guarantee provided to the City Engineer in accordance with the Construction, Guarantee of Performance, and Acceptance of Public Infrastructure Section in Chapter 12, Article 8 of this UDO. 3) The applicant will be advised of the date set for Planning and Zoning Commission consideration. 4) The Administrator shall recommend approval or disapproval of the same. b. Review and Recommendation by Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. If not already determined through an approved Preliminary Plan, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board shall review the plat application for compliance with the parkland dedication requirements of Chapter 12, Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements, and recommend approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval of the same. This recommendation must be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in its plat review. c. Criteria for Approval by Planning and Zoning Commission. Within thirty (30) days after the plat is filed, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall receive the recommendation of the Administrator and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and shall approve or disapprove such plat. The Commission's action shall be based on compliance with the review elements listed in Final Plat, Replat, Vacating Plat, and Development Plat Review and the City Engineer's approval of all required infrastructure as proposed in the construction documents and which has been constructed and accepted or guaranteed in accordance with the Construction, Guarantee of Performance, and Acceptance of Public Infrastructure Section in Chapter 12, Article 8 of this UDO. Conditions of approval must entail corrections, changes, or completion of items that are ministerial in nature and explicitly spelled out d. Recordation. If the Planning and Zoning Commission has approved the plat, the plat shall be recorded in the Office of the County Clerk of the county in which the plat is located when all requirements and conditions have been met. 4. Minor Plat and Amending Plat Review. a. Review and Action by Administrator. The plat shall be reviewed by the Administrator for compliance to all applicable requirements of this UDO including those elements identified in the Preliminary Plan Review and the following procedures: 1) Consideration of the approval, approval with conditions, or recommended denial of the plat by the Administrator usually within fifteen (15) days of filing a Minor Plat or Amending Plat; 2) The Administrator shall approve, approve with conditions, or recommend denial and forward the plat to the Planning and Zoning Commission at the next available meeting. The Administrator may also elect to forward the plat to the Commission for any reason. Conditions of approval must entail corrections, changes, or completion of items that are ministerial in nature and explicitly spelled out; 3) If forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Commission shall approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve the plat. Conditions of approval must entail corrections, changes, or completion of items that are ministerial in nature and explicitly spelled out; 4) Upon approval of the Commission meeting minutes, the Administrator shall make them available to the applicant; 5) A report shall be made to the Commission at each meeting notifying the Commission of any Amending Plats or Minor Plats that were approved by the Administrator since the last Commission meeting. b. Recordation. If favorable final action has been taken by the Administrator or the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Minor Plat or Amending Plat shall be recorded in the Office of the County Clerk of the county in which the plat is located when all requirements and conditions have been met. F. Waivers. The Planning and Zoning Commission, where authorized by this UDO, may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove waivers of the standards in Chapter 12, Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements. Planning & Development Services  1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960  College Station, TX 77840 Office 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM October 26, 2017 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Justin Golbabai AICP, CNU-A, Planning Administrator SUBJECT: UDO Amendment – Flexibility for Non-Conforming Uses and Structures Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amendment to Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance”, Section 9.2 “Nonconforming Uses”, Section 9.3 “Nonconforming Structures”, and Section 7.10.C.4 “Building Materials” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas to permit increased flexibility for non-conforming uses and structures. Case# ORDA2017-000007. Background: As part of the 2017 Plan of Work, Planning and Zoning Commission directed staff to review and identify UDO Requirements that add minimal value and consider opportunities to reduce regulations and streamline processes. One of the items identified by staff was providing additional flexibility and leniency on how and to what extent non-conforming uses and structures come into compliance with current requirements. A non-conforming use or structure (building, parking areas, etc.) are those properties developed under a previous set of regulations but now no longer complies with the City’s current Unified Development Ordinance. Traditionally, nonconformities have been allowed to remain but little substantial modifications can be made without full code compliance. While this approach enables a faster implementation of adopted plans and policies, allowing for a wider range of modifications to nonconforming properties can better encourage incremental infill and redevelopment, especially on challenging sites. Staff received feedback from stakeholders in the development community, neighborhood associations, and the general public on this item through two public meetings held in a “come and Planning & Development Services  1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960  College Station, TX 77840 Office 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 go” format on August 30th. On September 21st, Planning and Zoning Commission heard the results of this meeting and endorsed staff’s recommendations. This proposed ordinance amendment would enact the following changes:  Increase the amount an existing non-residential building or structure devoted to a non- conforming land use can be enlarged by right to 50% without needing to go to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.  Provide an administrative approval process that allows flexibility for existing non- conforming, non-residential structures where there are physical limitations that do not allow compliance with all UDO standards. In these situations, the Administrator would be allowed to make exceptions to parking and landscaping standards as well as reduce buffer width and planting requirements. The Administrator would not be able to reduce the number of parking spaces or landscaping points more than 50%.  Increase the total area of materials that can be changed or replaced on a non-residential buildings or multi-family building façade without requiring full compliance from 10% to 50%. This item is currently scheduled to be heard by City Council on Thursday, December 14 th, 2017. Supporting Materials: 1. Section 9 “Non-Conformities” Ordinance Redline 2. Section 7.10.C.4 “Building Materials” Ordinance Redline Page 1 Article 9. - Nonconformities Sec. 12-9.1. - General. Except as specified in this Article, any use, building, structure, or sign existing at the time of enactment of this UDO or classification amendment applicable to its use, may be continued even though such use, building, structure, or sign may not conform with the provisions of this UDO for the district in which it is located; provided, however, that this Article shall not apply to any use, building, structure, or sign established in violation of this UDO or ordinance previously in effect in College Station . Sec. 12-9.2. - Nonconforming Uses. A. Continuance. An existing use that is not in compliance with this UDO or subsequent amendments applicable to the use shall not be enlarged, extended, reconstructed, substituted or structurally altered unless the us e is brought into compliance with this UDO, except as follows: 1. Expansion. a. When authorized by the Zoning Board of Adjustment in accordance with the provisions of this Article, enlargement or completion of a building devoted to a nonconforming use may be made upon the lot occupied by such building, where such extension is necessary and incidental to the existing use of such building and does not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the original area of nonconformity. b. Buildings and structures devoted to nonconforming uses located within the area annexed by Ordinance No. 3331, adopted by the City Council on April 14, 2011, may be enlarged, extended, or structurally altered provided such enlargement, extension, or structural alteration is incidental to the existing use of such existing buildings and the enlargement does not exceed twenty-five fifty (2550) percent of the original area of nonconformity. Enlargements greater than twenty-five fifty (2550) percent of the original area of nonconformity shall require approval of the Zoning Board of Adjustment. 2. Conditional Use. A use existing on the effective date of this UDO, or subsequent amendment applicable to its use, which would only be permitted as a conditional use, shall be a lawful nonconforming use until altered pursuant to the Conditional Use Permit section of this UDO. In the event of issuance of a conditional use permit, such use becomes a permitted and lawful use. B. Termination. The City Council shall have the authority to initiate, on its motion, action to bring about the discontinuance of a nonconforming use under any plan whereby full value of the structure can be amortized within a definite period of time, taking into consideration the general character of the area and the necessity for all property to conform to the regulations of this UDO. C. Abandonment. Whenever a nonconforming use has been discontinued and changed to a conforming use, or whenever a nonconforming use has been discontinued or abandoned for more than three (3) months, a presumption of intent to abandon said use shall have been established and the right to continue the former nonconforming use shall no longer exist. Subsequent operation as a nonconforming use shall be unlawful. Page 2 (Ord. No. 2011-3355 , § 1(Exh. A), 6-23-2011; Ord. No. 2012-3449 , Pt. 1(Exh. M), 9-27-2012) Sec. 12-9.3. - Nonconforming Structures. A. Enlargement, Alteration. 1. A structure (including parking lots, parking structures, and parking areas), which is nonconforming by physical design may be enlarged or structurally altered as long as such enlargement or alteration otherwise complies with the terms of this UDO with the following exceptions: a. Parking Requirements: The Administrator may make exceptions to the requirement of following the UDO for parking requirements for non-residential properties where there are physical limitations and a demonstrated inability to meet all standards of this UDO but may not waive more than 50% of the required number of parking spaces. b. Landscaping Requirements: The Administrator may make exceptions to the requirement of following the UDO for landscaping requirements for non-residential properties where there are physical limitations and a demonstrated inability to meet all standards of this UDO but may not waive more than 50% of required landscaping points. c. Buffer Requirements: The Administrator may reduce required buffer yard widths and plantings where there are existing structures being retained in the required buffer area or where there are other physical limitations and a demonstrated inability to meet all standards of this UDO so long as such reductions do not increase the existing degree of nonconformity. 2. In NG-1, NG-2, and NG-3, the whole building plot must come into compliance with the requirements of this UDO when more than fifty (50) percent of a building(s) on the site is enlarged or altered. B. Termination. The City Council shall have the authority to initiate on its motion, or cause to be presented by interested property owner, action to bring about the discontinuance of a nonconforming structure under any plan whereby full value of the structure can be amortized within a definite period of time, taking into consideration the general character of the neighborhood and the necessity for all property to conform to the regulations of this UDO. C. Abandonment. Whenever a nonconforming structure has been discontinued or abandoned for more than three (3) months, a presumption of intent to abandon said structure shall have been established and the right to continue the former nonconforming structure shall no longer exist. Subsequent operation as a nonconforming structure shall be unlawful. Sec. 12-9.4. - Nonconforming Lots of Record. A. Authority to Utilize for Single-Family Residence. In any district in which single-family dwellings are a permitted use, notwithstanding the regulations imposed by any other provisions of this Section, a single-family detached dwelling that complies with the restrictions below may be erected on a nonconforming lot that is not less than thirty (30) feet in width, consisting entirely of one (1) tract of land of not less than three thousand (3,000) square feet, and that: 1. Has less than the prescribed minimum lot area, width, and/or depth; 2. Is shown by a recorded plat or deed to have been a lot of record owned separately and individually from adjoining tracts of land at a time when the creation of a lot of such size, depth, and width at such location would not have been prohibited by any zoning or other ordinance; and Page 3 3. Has remained in separate and individual ownership from adjoining tracts of land continuously during the entire time that the creation of such lot has been prohibited by the applicable zoning ordinance or other ordinances. B. Regulations for Single-Family Use of Nonconforming Lots. A nonconforming lot authorized to be used pursuant to this Section may be used for a single-family dwelling and no other structure except for a garage or carport. Construction of such single-family dwelling shall comply with all the regulations (except lot area, width, and depth) applicable to single- family dwellings in the zoning district in which the lot in question is located, except that the following side yard requirements shall apply in place of the side yard requirements otherwise applicable: 1. The dwelling shall be placed on the lot so as to provide a yard on each side of the dwelling. 2. The sum of the widths of the two (2) side yards on such lot shall be not less than the smaller of: a. Twenty-five (25) percent of the width of the lot; or b. The minimum total for both side yards prescribed by the bulk regulations for said zoning district; and 3. No side yard shall be less than three (3) feet wide. C. Regulations for Certain Nonconforming Lots Zoned R Rural. 1. A single-family dwelling and accessory structure(s) in areas zoned R Rural, may be erected or structurally altered on a nonconforming lot of record, that is not less than five thousand (5,000) square feet in area and not more than one (1) acre in area, so long as the structure or the addition to the structure complies with the setbacks established by the GS General Suburban zoning district. 2. A single-family dwelling or accessory structure located on property within the area annexed by Ordinance No. 3331, adopted by the City Council on April 14, 2011, may be erected or structurally altered on a nonconforming lot of record provided the proposed construction complies with the setback requirements established by the GS General Suburban zoning district. D. Other Uses of Nonconforming Lots: Site Plan Required. In any district in which single-family dwellings are not permitted, a nonconforming lot of record which meets the requirements above may be used for any use permitted in the district in which it is located if, but only if, a site plan for such use has been approved in accordance with the provisions of the Site Plan Review section of this UDO. E. Lots Made Nonconforming by Right-of-Way Acquisition. Any lot made nonconforming solely by means of area dedicated, condemned, sold or otherwise conveyed for public right-of-way shall be allowed to pursue any allowed use as if such area were a part of the remaining lot, except that all applicable setbacks shall be adhered to. (Ord. No. 2011-3355 , § 1(Exh. B), 6-23-2011; Ord. No. 2012-3449 , Pt. 1(Exh. M), 9-27-2012; Ord. No. 2013-3521 , Pt. 1(Exh. N), 9-12-2013) Sec. 12-9.5. - Nonconforming Tracts. Unplatted properties made nonconforming by the zoning applied at the time of annexation shall be allowed to plat, provided that the resulting lot contains the entire tract. Sec. 12-9.6. - Nonconforming Signs. A. Continuation Allowed. Page 4 A lawfully nonconforming sign may continue in use except as otherwise provided in or authorized by this Section. A change in the information on the face of an existing nonconforming sign is allowed if the change does not increase the area of the sign face and involves no structural alteration. B. Alteration, Expansion, Moving. No nonconforming sign, by voluntary act of the owner, shall be: 1. Changed or altered in any manner which would increase the degree of its nonconformity; 2. Expanded (sign face); or 3. Moved in whole or in part to any other location where it would remain nonconforming. C. Signs Required to be Moved by the City. Any nonconforming sign required to be moved or removed by the City shall be removed or relocated in accordance with the provisions of the Texas Local Government Code. D. Regulations for Certain Nonconforming Properties Zoned R Rural . Attached signs may either be erected or structurally altered on a nonconforming nonresidential structure located on property within the area annexed by Ordinance No. 3331, dated April 14, 2011, provided the proposed sign or alteration complies with Section 12-7.5.I. "Attached Signs" of this UDO. (Ord. No. 2015-3643 , Pt. 1(Exh. A), 3-12-2015) Page 1 Sec. 12-7.10. - Non-Residential Architectural Standards. C. Standards for Non-Residential Structures. 4. Building Materials . a. The following minimum amount of fired brick, natural stone, marble, granite, or any concrete product so long as it has an integrated color and is textured or patterned (not aggregate material) to simulate brick, stone, marble, or granite shall be provided: 1. A minimum of ten (10) percent on any façade visible from a public right-of-way or public way; 2. A minimum of twenty (20) percent on primary entrance façades (single or multiple tenant building) that exceed two-hundred (200) feet in horizontal length; 3. A minimum of twenty (20) percent on any façade facing a public right-of-way of a street classified as a major collector on the Thoroughfare Plan; and 4. A minimum of thirty (30) percent on any façade facing a public right-of-way of a street classified as a minor arterial or greater on the Thoroughfare Plan. b. Building materials used to meet the minimum material requirements as provided above may not be painted. c. The following building materials are allowed on all façades subject to the following limitations: 1. Stucco, EIFS, high build textured paint on concrete to simulate the appearance of stucco, split-face concrete masonry that does not simulate brick or stone, fiber cement siding, reflective glass, or any material equivalent in appearance and quality as determined by the Design Review Board, shall not cover more than seventy-five (75) percent of any façade. 2. Wood or cedar siding, stainless steel, chrome, standing seam metal, premium grade architectural metal, or architecturally finished metal panels (not corrugated metal) shall not cover more than thirty (30) percent of any façade. 3. Tile or smooth face, tinted concrete blocks shall only be used as an accent and shall not cover more than ten (10) percent of any façade. 4. Painted metal panel siding is allowed without limitation on a rear façade of a building when the façade is not visible from a right-of-way, parkland, greenway, or any residential area. 5. Galvanized steel and painted steel are allowed on doors, including roll-up doors. 6. Metal, standing seam metal, architectural metal or steel may be used as a roof and or canopy/awnings with no limitation on percentage. 7. In WC Wellborn Commercial wood or cedar siding shall be allowed but not cover more than seventy-five (75) percent of any façade and reflective glass shall not cover more than thirty (30) percent of any façade. d. When determining the area of a façade, doors, windows, and other openings are included and roof area is not included. e. Existing buildings may continue to utilize materials other than those listed provided that any material replacement is for maintenance purposes only and the existing material is continued. Any material change or replacement of more than ten fifty (1050) percent of the total area of a façade, including on a cumulative basis, shall require that all building materials and color be brought into compliance on that façade. f. All architectural submittals shall provide elevation drawings for each façade and a material legend (see sample below) for each façade. Page 2 SAMPLE LEGEND USE OF MATERIALS ON FAÇADE 'A' Total Square Footage of Façade 'A': 10,000 s.f. Material Area in Square Feet Percent of Overall Façade Stucco 2,000 s.f. 20% Brick 5,000 s.f. 50% Doors and Windows 3,000 s.f. 30% Planning & Development Services  1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960  College Station, TX 77840 Office 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM November 16, 2017 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Jason Schubert, AICP, Transportation Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: 2017 Update to the Thoroughfare Plan with Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan Amendments Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the College Station Comprehensive Plan by amending the Thoroughfare Plan and the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan to incorporate revisions related to the Bryan/College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization 2050 Thoroughfare Concept and other City-initiated changes and clean up items. Case #CPA2017-000019 Recommendations: The Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Advisory Board considered this item at their November 6, 2017 meeting and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the bicycle and pedestrian portions of the amendment. Summary: Following a series of 12 public meetings and revisions resulting from thousands of written and verbal comments, the Bryan/College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Policy Board adopted a 2050 Thoroughfare Concept plan in June 2017 (see attached). The MPO Concept consists of major roadways classified as arterials and highways intended as a guide to help develop a County-wide roadway network to support the long-term growth anticipated in Brazos County. In forming the MPO Concept, it was assumed that the population of Brazos County would double by 2050. The current College Station Thoroughfare Plan utilizes a 2035 planning horizon for anticipated traffic volumes. As part of the upcoming 10-year update of the Comprehensive Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan will be further evaluated in relation to any changes made to land use assumptions and other planning goals and objectives. An overview of the MPO Concept was provided to City Council during their June 8, 2017 workshop and to the Planning and Zoning Commission during the June 15, 2017 workshop. As planned in the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work, staff has identified the amendments needed to incorporate the MPO’s 2050 Thoroughfare Concept into the College Station Thoroughfare Plan as well as the revisions to bicycle and pedestrian facilities along these roadways that would amend the Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan. To incorporate the MPO Concept, some of the collector thoroughfares needed to be realigned to appropriately relate to the revised arterial and highway network provided in the MPO Concept. For reference, the typical cross sections for each thoroughfare classification (major arterial, minor arterial, major collector, minor collector, and rural collector) along with their general range of traffic volume per day, and example roadways are attached. There have been several amendments to the current Thoroughfare Plan since it was adopted with the Comprehensive Plan in 2009. In addition, with development that has occurred since then, there are a number of areas that the Thoroughfare Plan map does not reflect the exact placement of existing or approved thoroughfares as they have been implemented. A separate ordinance amendment is being proposed to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to clarify that the thoroughfare plan maps and other master plan documents can be updated as plans are approved and developments occur so that the depiction of the plans remain current. In addition to incorporating the MPO Concept classifications and alignments, staff proposes some clean up items to reflect existing and approved alignments as well as other City-initiated amendments. Maps that depict the overall existing and proposed Thoroughfare Plan, bicycle facilities, and pedestrian facilities are attached along with a spreadsheet that lists the proposed amendments with a brief description. Some highlights of the proposed amendments are also described below. Map book zoom-in comparisons with each change categorized as MPO- related or City-initiated with clean-ups have been created but are too large to provide as part of the meeting packet so are available for viewing on the Planning & Development Services webpage at www.cstx.gov/devservices. This item is scheduled for final consideration by the City Council at their November 20, 2017 meeting. Proposed Amendment Highlights: There are numerous items proposed as part of the Thoroughfare Plan update with associated Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan amendments. Some highlights are as follows: MPO Concept Highlights:  The Concept depicts the planned creation of an outer Freeway loop near the perimeter of Brazos County and an inner Super Arterial loop being a continuation of FM 2818/William D. Fitch Parkway. The possible Interstate 14 corridor, which is designated to generally follow US Highway 190, is also accommodated by using either the SH 21 or SH 30 corridors to the east. The alignment of these future Freeways is intended to be within a mile of the depiction shown on the MPO Concept. These facilities will need further study to designate a specific alignment.  In College Station and southern Brazos County, 16 existing and planned grade separations along the Freeway and Super Arterial corridors are proposed to be added to the 22 existing and planned grade separations on the current Thoroughfare Plan.  Jones Butler Road is proposed to be extended across Harvey Mitchell Parkway with a future grade separation as planned previously before a 2008 amendment realigned it Holleman Drive in response to the Harvey Mitchell Parkway grade separation at Wellborn Road not being extended over Jones Butler Road.  A new Major Arterial is proposed to connect Rock Prairie Road West to William D. Fitch Parkway at Wellborn Road via a grade separation across the railroad. Thoroughfare Plan Color Scheme:  During the June 2017 Council workshop discussion, staff was directed to utilize the same color scheme as the MPO Concept for the depiction of the College Station Thoroughfare Plan. The proposed color scheme is the same as the MPO Concept with two exceptions. College Station currently has two types of major arterials (4-lane and 6- lane) instead of the single type depicted in the MPO Concept so the colors currently used for those types are retained. Also, College Station does not have a Super Arterial classification and is not proposed at this time. Items from MPO Concept Not Being Incorporated:  The College Station Thoroughfare Plan does not have a Super Arterial classification. The roadways designated as Super Arterial on the MPO Concept are proposed to retain their Freeway/Expressway or 6-lane Major Arterial classifications as currently designated. These corridors generally have the right-of-way necessary for the Super Arterial classification. Further consideration of the Super Arterial designation may occur with the 10-year update to the Comprehensive Plan.  The Barron Road extension east of SH 6 over to Rock Prairie Road is shown on the MPO Concept and current Thoroughfare Plan as a future 4-lane Minor Arterial. There is an old landfill near SH 6 and significant floodplain in the area that hinder the feasibility of this roadway. Staff contracted with Kimley-Horn Associates to perform a thoroughfare assessment of the Medical District area east of SH 6 to assess multiple roadways and determined that the Barron Road extension could be removed from the Thoroughfare Plan due to sufficient capacity of other planned roadways.  The Pebble Creek Parkway extension north of William D. Fitch Parkway over to SH 6 is shown on the MPO Concept as a future Minor Arterial. This roadway meets SH 6 north of the on ramp to SH 6 so utilization for through movement is not fully realized. The thoroughfare assessment performed by Kimley-Horn showed the existing Major Collector classification was sufficient given anticipated future traffic volumes on this portion of Pebble Creek Parkway. City-Initiated Highlights:  The MPO Concept is limited to the MPO planning area of Brazos County. The College Station Thoroughfare Plan currently depicts some future thoroughfares to the west in Burleson County and to the east in Grimes County. As College Station has an Inter- Local Agreement (ILA) with Burleson County to not review subdivisions in Burleson County and does not have an ILA for subdivisions in Grimes County, it is proposed to simplify the Thoroughfare Plan by removing the thoroughfares depicted outside of Brazos County.  As part of the thoroughfare assessment performed by Kimley-Horn for the Medical District area east of SH 6, some thoroughfares are proposed to be amended. As mentioned previously, the Barron Road extension east of SH 6 is proposed to be removed. A future Major Collector crossing significant floodplain is also proposed to be removed along with a future Minor Collector to be realigned to Rock Prairie Road instead of crossing significant floodplain. The remaining thoroughfares intersecting the east side of SH 6 between Rock Prairie Road and William D. Fitch Parkway consist of Scott & White Boulevard (Minor Collector), Lakeway Drive (Major Collector), Bird Pond Road extension (4-lane Minor Arterial), and Pebble Creek Parkway extension (Major Collector) and provide sufficient capacity and circulation in this area given the development potential and constraints from floodplain and former landfills.  The City has participated with residents in the Wellborn area regarding the potential relocation of the railroad crossing at South Dowling Road and Wellborn Road. In 2013, the Wellborn Community Plan planned for the railroad crossing to be relocated to an extension of Greens Prairie Road West though this is no longer considered feasible given the railroad track is super elevated at that location and existing development in the area. In conjunction with the MPO Concept, the railroad crossing is proposed to be relocated to align with the Royder Road realignment to Wellborn Road as the right-of- way for that was acquired earlier this year. Connection to the remaining Koppe Bridge Road and existing businesses would be determined as part of the design of the railroad crossing relocation project.  A new Major Arterial is proposed on the MPO Concept from Rock Prairie Road West to William D. Fitch Parkway at Wellborn Road. With this new roadway, General Parkway is proposed to extend south of Rock Prairie Road West and tie into the new Major Arterial. A portion of Old Wellborn Road and North Graham Road would be removed from the Thoroughfare Plan as General Parkway would serve as the thoroughfare connection.  The majority of the proposed City-initiated amendments reclassify thoroughfares or modify their alignment as they have been constructed or as per approved plans. Attachments: 1. MPO 2050 Thoroughfare Concept 2. Typical Thoroughfare Cross Sections 3. Existing and Proposed Thoroughfare Plan 4. Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities 5. Existing and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities 6. Spreadsheet Listing of Proposed Amendments (AIRFIELD) (SANDERSONFARMS) (EASTERWOODAIRPORT) (TEXAS A&MUNIVERSITY SYSTEMRELLIS CAMPUS) LA SA L LE WASHINGT O N COUN TYROAD108FM 39MAINCOUNTYROAD 118COUNTYROAD174FM 379S T A T E H I GH W A Y 30 YERBYCOUNTYROAD162 COUNTY ROAD 164COUNTYROAD103DU K E GILPIN ROESEBARNETT C O U N T Y ROA D 1 9 2JUBILEEFM 1696 PI ERCECOUNTYROAD102 COUN T YROAD16 6OAK DEBBIEC O U N TY R OAD 401LE A N I N GO AKSC O UNTYROA D112COUNTY ROAD109FM 244COUN TYROA D4 0 3JOHNRICELANCASTER FM1227C O U N TYROAD17 5 FM3 0 9 0COUNTYROAD190CHANEYCOUNTYR O AD104 LANDSENDCOUNTYROAD106 FM 1361COUNTYROAD269F M 2 0 3 9 BEAVERCREEKCOUNTYROAD119COUNTY ROAD2 68S TAT E HIG H W AY36 6THCOUNTYROAD4432NDLO W W O O D COUN TY ROAD408 FM 3 0 5 8 COUNTYRO A D 423FM 60COUNTY ROAD 2609THC O U N T Y R OAD444COUNTY ROAD 428 F M 1 6 6 CO UNTYR O AD434 FM 1362FO L Z TEALLAKE OA KFORESTPARK EL M COUNTYROAD201COUNTYROAD262COUNTYROAD225C OUNTYROAD 246 DOE C O U N T Y ROAD 4 3 3 C OUNTYRO AD340COUNTYR OAD2 2 4COUNTY ROAD 264PARKR D57 COUNT YROAD 424 HAISLE RCOUN TYROAD 274A N TLERCREEK COUNTYROAD409COUNTY ROAD 4 2 0 COUNTYROAD276COUNTY ROAD 277COUNTY ROAD 440RECREATIONALRD4 FM50 COUNTY ROAD 415COUNTYRO AD216WHI T ET AI L LA K E V I E W MALLARDTH ORNBE R R Y COUNTY ROAD 272A CCESSCOUNTYROAD244 COUNTY ROAD 247C O U N TYROAD23 6 COU NTY ROAD229 FIC KCOUNTY ROAD 338COUN T Y R O A D 2 1 7 REVEILLE SAMPSON C OUNTYROA D 255COUNTY ROAD295EMU 5THSPRINGFIELD STATEHIGHWAY21BATSON STEWARTMITTELSTEDT ZULCHBUNDIC FM 1452 LEE FM 978 HARRISTAPPAYNETIMBERBLAGRAVES CHURCHJAKE COLEWALLER HOMERESKRIDGEDAVID MCKI N L E Y HOLLISOLSENDISERENS STARVIE WFM 2865WESTCAN EYDONAHOFM 1372KINGLONE STARDE NMANPLEASANT GROVEWATSO N HOLOMONMUSGROVEBURNSFM 3 9 1 FM46TAYLORM A R K E T OSRG R A N T W E ST H E N RY PRAIRIESHILOHCHURCHDECHERD 4TH1STRAILROAD3RDC E D A R S T A T E HIGHWAY68TH CALHOUNS A N G A B R I E LHARLESS MUMFORD-BENCHLEYF M 1 9 4 0 F M 2 4 4 6 M C N U TT CEDAR C R E E K M U D CREEK LEESC H A P E LMUS E FM1644BUCKSNORTO LDHICKORY G R O V E HUGHES CUTOFFHIDDENH IL LJ A C K R A B B I T R EIS TIN O G I N D J EDDINS ASTINCARTERMCGEE WALKER PRAIRIEMAT EJKAJ W MAR T INE M T C A LV A RY DENENAMKS M IT H WATTSMORGANOL D H E A R N E M C C ARVEROLDFRANKL I NFOYTDU N N S F O R TUSHIGHWAY79PINOAK RI V E RRIDGE SADBERRYH E N R Y P R AIRIEMI T CHMCMI L L ANP O S T O A K F M2549BARRVILLEJ P PRYORJ ACK BRE WEREDWARDSJESSE COPEW A R R E N HARBOR B OLTO NCOUNTYROAD456FM 3 9 0 STATE HIGHWAY 105L B J SWEED NEWMANLEAGUEQUARRY GASKAMPFM 1 3 7 0 BOSSE BLUFF PI CKENSFM 912CLAYCREEKSU N O I L S C H W A R T Z GER K E SAMHOUSTONKETTLE R HIDALGO FALLSFM1935SOMMERMT F A L L SSCHOO L FM2621JENSENBUCK C O L E S R E N NASAHOXIETAPPEWELLMANN DA N N H E I M L IT T L E R O C K Y MCCRAVENSCHOOLELLERMANNWM PENN MA Y F A I R FM 1155STARMERTI NSCREEKCLAYSH 6S E A R L R U D D E R F W STEX A S A V S NEARLRUDDERFW TEX A S A V W EL L B O R N R D FM 2 1 5 4 E29THST W S H 21 SANDYPOINTRD WMLKST BOONVILLE RD N HARVE YMITCHELL PWE WJB P W WVILLAMARIARD RAYMONDSTOTZERPWE OSRFM9 7 4SH 6SFRONTAGERDELEONARD RDPEACHCREEKRDE MLKS TTABORR D S C O LLE G E AV SH 6 SFRONTAGE RD W HA R V E Y MITCHELLP W S ELMO WEEDON RDE SH 21NSH6 SH 30 SH 105WILLIAMDFITCHPWNFM2038 ROCK P RAIRIERD STEXASAVW OSRFINFEATHER RD N T E X A S A V BROADMOORDRFM 159FM1179FM 50 ® 1 inch = 3 miles 2050 BCS MPO THOROUGHFARE CONCEPT Legend 2050 BCS MPO THOROUGHFARE CONCEPT CLASSIFICATION GRADE SEPARATION - EXISTING FREEWAY 250' - 400' ROW FREEWAY PROPOSED 250' - 400' ROW SUPER ARTERIAL (6 Lanes) - 150' ROW MAJOR ARTERIAL (4 or 6 Lanes) - 125' ROW SUPER ARTERIAL-PROPOSED (6 Lanes) - 150' ROW MAJOR ARTERIAL PROPOSED (4 or 6 Lanes) - 125' ROW BRYAN CITY LIMITS COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS BRAZOS COUNTY BOUNDARY GRADE SEPARATION - PROPOSED , MINOR ARTERIAL - 105' ROW MINOR ARTERIAL-PROPOSED - 105' ROW Map Published June 27, 2017 COB - Rakidd BRYAN ETJ COLLEGE STATION ETJ RAILROADS STREETS 12.5’12.5’ 12’12.5’12’6’21’ Sidewalk Median Shared-Use PathTravel LaneTravel Lane 12.5’ Travel LaneTravel Lane 12’ Travel LaneTravel Lane 130’ 37’37’ Thoroughfare Cross Sections Typical Sections City of College Station Major Arterial Minor Arterial Note: All dimensions measured from back-of-curb and center of stripe. 12.5’12.5’ 12’12’6.5’6.5’2’2’6’6’17’ Sidewalk Median SidewalkTravel Lane Bike LaneBike Lane Travel LaneTravel LaneTravel Lane 105’ 33’33’ Thoroughfare Cross Sections Typical Sections City of College Station 12’12’6’ 2’2’ 6’6’6’14’ Sidewalk TWLTL SidewalkBike LaneBike Lane Travel LaneTravel Lane 80’ 54’ Major Collector 12’ 12’7’7’6’6’ Sidewalk SidewalkBike LaneBike Lane Travel LaneTravel Lane 60’ 38’ Minor Collector 16’2’2’16’28’28’ Open Ditch 4:1 Slope Maximum Travel LaneTravel LaneRibbon CurbRibbon Curb90’ 36’ Open Ditch 4:1 Slope Maximum Rural Collector T O WERSPW GE N E R A L P W I& G N RDPEACHCREEKRDM E S A V E R D EVICTORIAAV INDIANLAKESDRHSCPW CHEROKEEDRHOPESCREEKRDS T OUSLANDRDSTRAUB RDKOPPEBRIDGERDBIRDPONDRDLONESTAR L N TEX A S A V S GEORGE BUSH DRTEX A S A V E29THST W ELSH AVOLD RELIANCE RDWILLIAMDFITCHPWSANDY POINTRD W MLKST BARRON RDUNIVERSITY DREE WJBPW HARVEYRDWVILLAMARIARD FM 2154 ROCK PRAIRIERDUNIVERSITY DRANDERSONSTLEONARDRDW E L L B O R N R D WWJB PW DA RT MOUTH S TGROESBECKSTEMLKSTE SH 21W S H 21FM 974S C O LLE G E A V B R IA R C R ESTDRRAYMONDSTOTZERPWE A R L R U D D E R F WSN E A RL R U D D E R FW BOONVILLE RD CAPSTONE D R GREE NSPRAIRIERDWSH6S HARVEY M IT C HELLPWS RIVE R S I D E P W SH 30 FM158 MUMFOR D RDNHARVEY MIT CH E L L P WSTEXASAV N TE X A S A V OLD HE ARNERDWA L L I S R D S BRYAN AVFM 1 4 9COUNTYROAD174 COUNTYROAD180 YERBY COUNTY ROAD 164COUNTY R O A D 447 GILPIN ROESE JUBILEEFM 3 9 C O U NTYRO A D 409COUNTYR O A D 185C O U N T Y R O A D 1 2 1 COU N T Y ROAD 1 57 C OUNTYROA D1 6 6LONGOAK DEBBIECOUNTY R O A D 1 6 2 COUNT YRO A D 1 7 3 C O U N TY ROAD 404COUNTYROAD165FM 3090FM244 COU NT Y R OAD4 03JOHNRICE COUNT Y R OA D 188C O U N T Y ROAD17 5 COUNT YROAD 1 7 2 COUNT Y ROA D 1 7 6 COUNTYR OAD1 9 0 FM2039COUNTY ROAD2 68COUNTYROAD443FM 60FM 2 1 5 5COUNTY ROAD 260FM 166FM 1 3 6 1 FM 50 COUNTY ROAD 201COUNTY ROAD 262COU N T Y R O A D270COUNTY ROAD 264COUNTY ROAD 269FM 3 0 5 8COUNTY ROAD 227COUNTYROAD276COUNTY ROAD 277COUNTY ROAD 440COUNTY ROAD 272C OUNTY ROAD 274 RE V E I L L E C OUNTY ROAD255COU NTY ROAD 295¹ 0 5 102.5 Miles Existing Thoroughfare Plan 2 Lane Major Collector 2 Lane Minor Collector Grade Seperation Freeway/Expressway 6 Lane Major Arterial4 Lane Major Arterial4 Lane Minor Arterial PE B B L E C R E E K P WHSCPWT O WERSPW GE N E R A L P W I &G N RD PEACHCREEKRDM E S A V E R D EVICTORIAAV SADDL E CREEK DR H A R P ER'SFERRYRD INDIAN LAKESDRDYMPLELN H O P E SCREEKRDSTOUSLANDRDSTRAUB RDTIMBERLINE DRKOPPEBRIDGERDBIRDPONDRDCHEROKEEDRLONESTARLN TEX A S A V SGEORGE BUSH DRTEXASAV E 29TH ST WELSH A VHOLLEMANDR BARRON RDUNIVERSITY DRESOUTHW ESTPWNHAR VE Y MITCHELLPW EWJB P W HARVEY RDWVILLAMARIARDTARROW ST FM 2154 ROCK PRAIRIERD C A VITT A V UNIVERSITY DRANDERSONSTLEONARDRDW E L L B O R N R D W WJB PW D AR T MOUTHST E A R L R U D D E R F WSW SH 21 S C O LLE G E A V RAYMOND STOTZER PWNEARLRU D D E R F W BOONVILLERD CAPSTONE D R GREENSPRAIRIERDW SH6S HARVE Y M IT C HELLPWS RIVE R S I D E P W SH 30 FM158 WILLIAMDFITCHPWLINCOLNAVSTEXASAVSMAINST HOLLEMANDRWFINFEATHER RDCOUNTYROAD1 7 4 ROESE STJOH NS C O U N T Y ROA D 1 9 2 COUNTYROAD188C OUNTY ROAD166OAKDEBBIEC O UN TY R O A D 185COUNT YRO A D 1 7 3 C O U N T Y ROAD 404 COUNTY R O A D 401FM244COU NT Y RO AD4 03JOHNRICELANCA STER COUNTY ROAD 164COUNTYRO A D 1 7 5 F M3 0 9 0COUNTYROAD172COUNTYROAD190 COUNTY ROAD2 68COUNTY ROAD 443FM 60FM 2 1 5 5 FM 166FM 1361COUNTYROAD262COUNTY R O A D 2 7 0COUNTY ROAD 264PARKBLUE JAY COUNTYROAD269COUNTYROAD276COUNTY ROAD 277COUNTY ROAD 440COUNTY ROAD 272FM 50 REVEILLE COUNTY ROAD295¹ 0 5 102.5 Miles 2 Lane Major Collector 2 Lane Minor Collector Grade Seperation Freeway/Expressway 6 Lane Major Arterial4 Lane Major Arterial4 Lane Minor Arterial Proposed Thoroughfare Plan !!!!!!!!! !! ! !!!! !!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SPEARMA N DRHS C PWGE N E R A L P W I & GN RDPEACHCREEKRDM ESA V E R D EVICTORIAAVWALNUTRD SADD L E CREEK DR H A R PER'SFERRYRD IN DIANLAKESDR H OP ES CR EEKRDSTOUSLANDRDSTRAUB RDTIMBERLINEDRKOPPEBRIDGERD BIRDPONDRDCHEROKEEDRLONESTARLN TEX A S A V SGEORGEBUSHDRTEX A S A V WE L L B O R N R D E 29TH ST W ELSH AV WILLIAM D FITCH PWHOLLEMANDRBARRON RDUNIVERSITYDRESOUTHWESTPWNHAR VE Y MITCHELLPW HARVEY RDWVILLAMARIARDS MA IN STTARRO WST ROCKPRAIRIE R D FM 2 1 5 4HOLLEMANDREANDERSONSTLEONARD RDSOUTHWESTPWEGROESBECKSTE A R L R U D D E R FWSWSH21BRIARCREST DRSH 6 S S C O LLE G E A V RAYMOND STOTZER PWN E A RL R U D D E R F W GREENSPRAIRIERDWBOONVILLERD HARVE Y M I T C H ELLPWS RIVERSIDEPW SH 30 FM158 S TE XAS AV LINCOLNAVFINFEATHER RDCOUNTYROAD174ROESE C O U N T YROA D 1 9 2DEBBIECOUNTYROAD173 C O UN TYRO A D 401JOHNRICELA N C A S T E R FM 3090COUNTYROAD1 7 5 COUN TYRO A D 1 7 2 ST J OH NS FM 244COUNTY ROAD 190FM 60COUNTYROAD272FM 2 1 5 5 C OUNTY ROAD268COUNTYROAD269LUKEBUSHCOUNTYROAD295 COUNTY ROAD 277FM 5 0 REVEILLE ¹ 0 5 102.5 Miles Existing Bicycle Master Plan Multi-use Path ProposedMulti-use Path Funded! ! ! Multi-use Path Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation Funded Grade Separation Existing !!!!Bike Lane Existing ! ! !Bike Lane Funded Bike Lane Proposed Bike Route Existing Bike Route Proposed !!!!!!!!! !! ! !!!! !!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SPEARMA N DRHS C PWI & GN RD PEACHCREEKRDM ESA V E R D EVICTORIAAVWALNUTRD SADD L E CREEK DR H A R PER'SFERRYRD INDIA N LAKESDR H OP ES CR E EKRDSTOUSLANDRDSTRAUB RDTIMBERLINEDRKOPPEBRIDGERD BIRDPONDRDCHEROKEEDRLONESTARLN TEX A S A V SGEORGEBUSHDRTEX A S A V WE L L B O R N R D E 29TH ST W ELSH AV WILLIAM D FITCH PWHOLLEMANDRBARRON RDUNIVERSITYDRESOUTHWESTPWNHAR VE Y MITCHELLPW HARVEY RDWVILLAMARIARDS MA IN STTARRO WST ROCK PRAIRIERD FM 2 1 5 4HOLLEMANDREANDERSONSTLEONARD RDSOUTHWESTPWEGROESBECKSTE A R L R U D D E R FWSWSH21BRIARCREST DRSH 6 S S C O LLE G E A V RAYMOND STOTZER PWN E A RL R U D D E R F W GREENSPRAIRIERDWBOONVILLERD HARVE Y M I T C H ELLPWS RIVERSIDEPW SH 30 FM158 S TE XAS AV LINCOLNAVFINFEATHER RDCOUNTYROAD174ROESE C O U N T YROA D 1 9 2DEBBIECOUNTYROAD173 C O UN TYRO A D 401JOHNRICELA N C A S T E R FM 3090COUNTYROAD1 7 5 COUN TYRO A D 1 7 2 ST J OH NS FM 244COUNTY ROAD 190FM 60COUNTYROAD272FM 2 1 5 5 C OUNTY ROAD268COUNTYROAD269LUKEBUSHCOUNTYROAD295 COUNTY ROAD 277FM 5 0 REVEILLE ¹ 0 5 102.5 Miles Proposed Bicycle Master Plan Multi-use Path ProposedMulti-use Path Funded! ! ! Multi-use Path Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation Funded Grade Separation Existing !!!!Bike Lane Existing ! ! !Bike Lane Funded Bike Lane Proposed Bike Route Existing Bike Route Proposed PE B B L E C R E E K P W SPEAR M A NDRHS C P WGE N E R A L P W I &G N R D PEACHCREEKRDM ESA V E R D EVICTORIAAVHARPER'SFERRYRD INDIA N LAKESDR P E A C H C R E E K C U T -O F F R D DY M P L E L N WA L N U T R D H OP ES CRE E KRDSTRAUB RD T IM B ERLI N EDRKOPPEBRIDGERDBIRDPONDRDCHEROKEEDRLONESTARL N TEX A S A V S GEORGEBUSHDRTEXASAV WE L L B O R N R DUNIVERSITY DRE 29TH ST WILLIAM D FITCH PWHOLLEMANDRBARRON RDUNIVERSITYDRESOUTHWESTPWNHAR V E Y MITCHELLPW HARVEYRDW VILLA MARIA RDTARR O WST ROCK PRAIRIE RDHOLLEMANDREC A VITT A V ANDERSONSTLEONARD RDDAR TMOUTHSTGROESBECKST E A R L R U DDERFWSW SH 21BRIARCREST DREVILLAMARIARDFM 2154 S C O L L E G E A VS MA IN STRAYMOND STOTZER PWN E A R L R U D D E R F W GEORGEBUSHDRWGREENSPRAIRIERDWBOONVILLE RD HAR VE Y MITCHELLP W S RIVERSIDEP W SH 30 FM158 SH 6 SLINCOLNAVS TE XAS A VFINFEATHER RDROESE DEBBIECOUNTYROAD175JOHNRICELANC AS T ERKING OAKSST J OH NS FM60FM 5 0 COUNTY ROAD 269REVEILLEPRIVATER OAD4048PRIVATEROAD4007¹ 0 5 102.5 Miles Existing Pedestrian Master Plan Multi-use Path Existing Multi-use Path Funded Multi-use Path Proposed Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation Funded Grade Separation Existing Sidewalk ProposedSidewalk FundedSidewalk Existing on One SideSidewalk Existing on Both Sides !!!! PEBBLEC RE EK P W SPEARM A N DRH SC PWI & GN RDPEACHCREEKRDM ESA V E R D EVICTORIAAV SADDLE CREEKDR H A R PER'SFERRYRD IN DIANLAKESDR STOUSLANDRDPEACH CREEK CUT-OFF RD DY M P L E L N WA L N U T R D H OP ES CRE E KRDSTRAUB RD T I M B ERLI N EDRKOPPEBRIDGERDBIRDPONDRDCHEROKEEDRLONESTARLN TEX A S A V SGEORGEBUSHDRTEXASAV WE L L B O R N R DUNIVERSITY DRE 2 9T HS T WELSH A V WILLIAM D FITCH PWB R IARCRESTDRHOLLEMANDRBARRON RDUNIVERSITYDRESOUTHWESTPWN HA RVEYMITCHELLPW HARVEYRDWVILLAMARIARDTARR O WST ROCK PRAIRIE RDHOLLEMANDREC A VITT A V ANDERSONSTLEONARD RDDARTMOUT H S T E A R L R U DDERFWSEVILLAMARIARDGROESBECKSTFM 2 1 5 4 S C O L L E G E A V RAYMOND STOTZER PWWSH21N E A R L R U D D E R F W GEORGEBUSH DRWFINFEATHER RDGREENSPRAIRIERDWHAR VE Y MITC HELLP W S RIVERSIDEP W SH 30 FM158 SH6SLINCOLNAVS TE XAS AV ROESE OWL T R E E COUNTYROAD 1 7 5DEBBIE COUNTYROAD 173JOHNRICELANCASTERKINGOAKSST J OH NS C AJU N R IDGE COUNTY ROAD 190FM60FM 5 0 COUNTYROAD269REVEILLE PRIVATEROAD4007¹ 0 5 102.5 Miles Proposed Pedestrian Master Plan Multi-use Path Existing Multi-use Path Funded Multi-use Path Proposed Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation Funded Grade Separation Existing Sidewalk ProposedSidewalk FundedSidewalk Existing on One SideSidewalk Existing on Both Sides !!!! Proposed Thoroughfare Plan Update with Bicycle and Pedestrian-Related Changes Changes Based on the Adopted MPO 2050 Thoroughfare Concept [see map book comparison of existing and proposed at www.cstx.gov/devservices] From To 1 1,7 Texas Avenue University Drive Bryan City limits Reclassify from 4-lane Minor Arterial to 4-lane Major Arterial. 2 2 Future Minor Arterial Harvey Road Linda Lane extension Reclassify from 4-lane Minor Arterial to Major Collector and terminate into extension of Linda Lane as Future Minor Arterial not shown on MPO Concept.Add bike route None 3a 3,9,15 Bird Pond Road and future realignment Rock Prairie Road SH 30 Reclassify from 4-lane Minor Arterial to 4-lane Major Arterial, realign more with existing roadway, and extend across SH 30. Realign bike route from west of Linda Lane extension to SH 30 3b 9 Future Minor Collector (portion of existing Bird Pond Road)Bird Pond Road (existing)Bird Pond Road (realignment) Remove as Future Minor Collector as portion of Bird Pond Road being a future 4-lane Major Arterial is proposed to revert to existing roadway. 4a 4,10 William D. Fitch Parkway (future realignment) East of Tonkaway Lake Road SH 30 Realign east of Tonkaway Lake Road to the north toward SH 30 to provide adequate spacing from Future Eastern Freeway loop and extend across SH 30. 4b 10 William D. Fitch Parkway (remaining)East of Tonkaway Lake Road SH 30 Classify roadway remaining after realignment to Major Collector and tie into realigned portion. Remove bike lanes as multi-use path added to realigned section None 5a 4,10,16, 17,22,26 Future Eastern Freeway Loop SH 6 SH 30 Reclassify Peach Creek Road from 4-lane Minor Arterial to Freeway/Expressway and realign and extend across SH 30. Change bike lanes to multi- use path from SH 6 to Rock Prairie Road and realign Change sidewalks to multi-use path from SH 6 to Rock Prairie Road and realign 5b 10 Future Grade Separation Add future grade separation at SH 30 and Future Eastern Freeway loop. 5c 17 Future Grade Separation Add future grade separation at Rock Prairie Road and Future Eastern Freeway loop. 6 6,7 Wellborn Road University Drive Bryan City limits Reclassify from 4-lane Minor Arterial to 4-lane Major Arterial. 7a 6 F&B Road Wellborn Road Turkey Creek Road Reclassify from Major Collector to 4-lane Minor Arterial. Change bike route/lanes to multi-use path as per 2017 TAMU Campus Master Plan. Add multi-use path as per 2017 TAMU Campus Master Plan 7b 6 HSC Parkway Turkey Creek Road SH 47 Add as 4-lane Minor Arterial as constructed. 7c 6 Existing Grade Separation Add existing grade separation at SH 47 and HSC Parkway. 8 6,12, 13,18, 19,23,24 Future Western Arterial Loop/ Hopes Creek Road extension HSC Parkway Future Western Freeway Loop Reclassify from 6-lane Major Arterial to 4-lane Minor Arterial, realign from continuation of SH 47 to HSC Parkway with future grade separation at Raymond Stotzer Pkwy (FM 60) and intersect Future Western Freeway loop to the south. 9a 7,13 Luther Street West and extension Jones Butler Road North Dowling Road Reclassify from Major Collector to 4-lane Minor Arterial and realign at North Dowling Road to become through movement. Realign bike lanes on extension Realign sidewalks on extension 9b 7,13 Future Grade Separation Add future grade separation at Harvey Mitchell Parkway and Luther Street West. 9c 13 North Dowling Road extension Luther Street West extension Future Western Arterial Loop/Hopes Creek Road extension Reclassify from Major Collector to 4-lane Minor Arterial, realign at Luther Street West for it to become through movement instead, and add extension at existing 90 degree curve to Future Western Arterial Loop/Hopes Creek Road extension. Add bike lanes on extension to Future Western Arterial loop Add sidewalks on extension to Future Western Arterial loop 10a 10 SH 30 William D. Fitch Parkway (future realignment) Future Eastern Freeway Loop Reclassify from 4-lane Major Arterial to 6-lane Major Arterial.Remove bike route None 10b 5,10 SH 30 Future Eastern Freeway loop Navasota River Reclassify from 4-lane Major Arterial to Freeway/Expressway.Remove bike route None 11 11,12 Lightsey Lane extension Raymond Stotzer Parkway Bryan City limits Reclassify from 4-lane Minor Arterial to Minor Collector as future Minor Arterial not shown on MPO Concept. 12a 13 Jones Butler Road extension Harvey Mitchell Parkway Holleman Drive South Add as future 4-lane Minor Arterial.Add bike lanes Add sidewalks 12b 13 Future Grade Separation Add future grade separation at Harvey Mitchell Parkway and Jones Butler Road. Map Book Page #'s Proposed Bicycle Changes Proposed Pedestrian Changes Change #Thoroughfare Extent Proposed Thoroughfare Change Description None None Add multi-use path to realigned section None Add future grade separation None None Add existing grade separation Add future grade separation at FM 60 and multi-use path from SH 47 to North Dowling extension with bike route beyond to existing Hopes Creek Road. Add future grade separation None Add future grade separation # Proposed Thoroughfare Plan Update with Bicycle and Pedestrian-Related Changes Changes Based on the Adopted MPO 2050 Thoroughfare Concept [see map book comparison of existing and proposed at www.cstx.gov/devservices] From To Map Book Page #'s Proposed Bicycle Changes Proposed Pedestrian Changes Change #Thoroughfare Extent Proposed Thoroughfare Change Description # 13 13 Future Grade Separation Add future grade separation at Harvey Mitchell Parkway and Holleman Drive South. 14a 13,19 Blue Ridge Drive North Dowling Road Brazos River Reclassify from Minor Collector to 4-lane Major Arterial, realign portion at curve to extend to Hope Creek Road and Brazos River. Add bike route on realigned section to Hopes Creek Road None 14b 13,14 Rock Prairie Road West North Dowling Road Wellborn Road Reclassify from Major Collector to 4-lane Major Arterial. 14c 13,14 Rock Prairie Road Wellborn Road Longmire Drive Reclassify from 4-lane Minor Arterial to 4-lane Major Arterial. 14d 14 Future Grade Separation Add future grade separation at Wellborn Road and Rock Prairie Road. 15a 14 William D. Fitch Parkway extension Wellborn Road Rock Prairie Road West Add 4-lane Major Arterial to connect Rock Prairie Road West to future grade separation at Wellborn Road and William D. Fitch Pkwy.Add bike lanes Add sidewalks 15b 14 Towers Parkway extension Rock Prairie Road West I&GN Road Remove future Minor Collector in conflict with proposed 4-lane Major Arterial extension including portion on existing manufactured home park. Remove bike lanes as roadway is removed Remove sidewalks as roadway is removed 16 15,16,17 Rock Prairie Road Bradley Drive Peach Creek Road Reclassify from 4-lane Minor Arterial to 4-lane Major Arterial. 17a 15,16, 22 Pebble Creek Parkway and extension William D. Fitch Parkway SH 6 at Peach Creek Reclassify from Major Collector to 4-lane Minor Arterial and realign past future 4-lane Minor Arterial to replace future Major Collector and future Minor Collector sections to extend through to SH 6 overpass north of Peach Creek. Realign bike lanes and change bike route to bike lanes from Pebble Creek subdivision to Future Minor Arterial to south. Realign sidewalks 17b 22 Existing Grade Separation Add existing grade separation at SH 6 and Pebble Creek Pkwy extension south of Texas World Speedway. 18 15,21, 24, 25 Arrington Road and extension William D. Fitch Parkway Wellborn Road Reclassify from Major Collector to 4-lane Minor Arterial. 19a 16,22 Southern Pointe Parkway extension SH 6 Rock Prairie Road Realign 4-lane Minor Arterial east of Pipeline Road and reclassify from future Major Collector to Rock Prairie Road and replace east of Lick Creek Park.Realign bike lanes Realign sidewalks 19b 22 Pipeline Road extension Southern Pointe Parkway Future Minor Arterial extension Remove future Minor Collector north of Southern Pointe Parkway due to reconfiguration of Pebble Creek Parkway extension. Remove bike lanes as roadway is removed Remove sidewalks as roadway is removed 20a 16,22 Future Minor Arterial SH 6 Pebble Creek Parkway extension Realign to intersect Pebble Creek Parkway extension instead of extending further east to Peach Creek Road.Realign bike lanes Realign sidewalks 20b 16,22 Future Major Collector Pebble Creek Parkway extension Southern Pointe Parkway extension Realign future Major Collector to continue Future Minor Arterial east of Pebble Creek Parkway extension and extend to Southern Pointe Parkway extension at future Minor Collector to east. Realign bike lanes Realign sidewalks 20c 16,22 Future Major Collector Future Minor Arterial Future Major Collector Remove future Major Collector due to reconfiguration of Pebble Creek Parkway and Southern Pointe Parkway extensions. Remove bike lanes as roadway is removed Remove sidewalks as roadway is removed 21a 19,20, 23 Royder Road extension Royder Road (existing)Brazos River Reclassify Major Collector to 4-lane Minor Arterial, realign from planned railroad crossing at Greens Prairie Road to realignment of Royder Road at Wellborn Road and extend roadway to Brazos River; part of South College Station study with Wellborn community participants. Change bike route to bike lanes from Wellborn Road to Future Minor Collector and realign bike lanes east of Wellborn Road Add sidewalks from Wellborn Road to Future Minor Collector and realign sidewalks east of Wellborn Road 21b 20 South Dowling Road and realignment I&GN Road Royder Road extension Reclassify from Major Collector to Minor Collector and extend to Royder Road extension; part of South College Station study with Wellborn community participants. Change bike route to bike lanes and realign Add sidewalks to realigned section 21c 20 Koppe Bridge Road I&GN Road Wellborn Road Remove as Minor Collector due to realignment of Royder Road extension.Remove bike route as roadway is removed None 22 20 Capstone Drive Wellborn Road I&GN Road Reclassify from Major Collector to 4-lane Minor Arterial and adjust alignment to Barron Road at Wellborn Road.Realign bike lanes Realign sidewalks Add future grade separation None None Add future grade separation None Add existing grade separation None Proposed Thoroughfare Plan Update with Bicycle and Pedestrian-Related Changes Changes Based on the Adopted MPO 2050 Thoroughfare Concept [see map book comparison of existing and proposed at www.cstx.gov/devservices] From To Map Book Page #'s Proposed Bicycle Changes Proposed Pedestrian Changes Change #Thoroughfare Extent Proposed Thoroughfare Change Description # 23 20,24 I&GN Road/Straub Road/Stousland Road and extension Koppe Bridge Road Future Minor Arterial to south Reclassify from Minor Collector to 4-lane Minor Arterial, realign at Straub Road to become through movement, and extend west of Saddle Creek subdivision to future Minor Arterial to the south. Realign bike route at I&GN Road and Straub Road None 24 20,24 Greens Prairie Trail extension I&GN Road Future Western Arterial Add future 4-lane Minor Arterial to extend Greens Prairie Trail to the west. 25a 21 WS Phillips Parkway extension Greens Prairie Road Indian Lakes Drive Realign to Mesa Verde Drive via Indian Lakes Drive and reconfigure Indian Lakes Drive/Mesa Verde Drive intersection.Realign bike lanes Add and realign sidewalks 25b 21 Future Minor Collector Arrington Road Castlegate Drive extension Remove future Minor Collector from Windham tract due to reduced spacing between WS Phillips Parkway extension and realigned future Minor Collectors. Remove bike route as roadway is removed None 25c 21,25 Future Minor Collector Mesa Verde Drive Milican Reserve Minor Arterial Remove Minor Collector due to reconfiguration of WS Phillips Parkway/Mesa Verde Drive realignment and existing topography. Remove bike route as roadway is removed None 26a 21 Chaco Canyon Drive Mesa Verde Drive Indian Lakes Drive Reclassify from 4-lane Minor Arterial to Minor Collector as constructed as not shown on MPO Concept and realign to existing roadway. 26b 21,26 Future Minor Arterial Chaco Canyon Drive Indian Lakes Drive Remove future Minor Arterial as not shown on MPO Concept and not able to extend through Indian Lakes subdivsion. 27 22,26, 28 Future Minor Arterial SH 6 Indian Lakes Drive extension Add future 4-lane Minor Arterial from existing SH 6 grade separation north of Peach Creek to Indian Lakes Drive and extend to Future Western Freeway Loop at grade separation near Brazos River. Add bike route None 28 25,26, 29 High Prairie Road extension Wellborn Road FM 159 Realign future 4-lane Minor Arterial to FM 159 similar to proposed thoroughfare in Peach Creek Master Plan (Milican Reserve).Realign bike route None 29a 26,27, 28,29, 30 Future Western Freeway Loop SH 6 Brazos River Reclassify future western loop from 6-lane Major Arterial to Freeway/ Expressway, remove proposed Minor Collector on FM 159 to accommodate alignment, realign north of Millican community, and extend to Brazos River. 29b 26,27 Existing Grade Separation Add existing grade separation at SH 6 and FM 159. 29c 26 Future Grade Separation Add future grade separation at Future Western Freeway loop and Royder Road extension. 29d 26,30 Future Minor Arterial Royder Road extension Future Western Arterial Loop Reclassify future 4-lane Minor Arterial to Minor Collector due to alignment of Future Western Freeway loop. 29e 27 Future Minor Collector Future Western Freeway Loop Royder Road extension Remove future Minor Collector to intersect future Major Collector extension due to Future Western Arterial loop realignment. 29f 27 Future Minor Collector Future Western Freeway Loop Royder Road extension Realign future Minor Collector to intersect future Major Collector extension due to Future Western Arterial loop realignment. 29g 28 Future Grade Separation Add future grade separation at Future Western Freeway loop and Future Minor Arterial near Brazos River. 29h 29 Future Grade Separation Add future grade separation at Future Western Freeway loop and Future Western Arterial loop. 29i 29 Future Minor Collector High Prairie Road extension Future Western Freeway Loop Realign future Minor Collector to continue roadway and intersect Future Western Freeway loop. 29j 30 Future Grade Separation Add future grade separation at Future Western Freeway loop and Wellborn Road. 30 27 Existing Grade Separation Add existing grade separation on SH 6 between FM 159 and Westward Ho overpasses. 31a 27 Existing Grade Separation Add existing grade separation at SH 6 and Westward Ho. 31b 27 Royder Road south extension Future Minor Arterial SH 6 Realign Future 4-lane Minor Arterial to existing SH 6 grade separation at Westward Ho. Add bike route from Future Western Freeway Loop to existing bike route None Add existing grade separation None None None Add multi-use path from SH 6 to Royder Road extension Add future grade separation None None None None None None None None None Proposed Thoroughfare Plan Update with Bicycle and Pedestrian-Related Changes Changes Initiated by the City including Cleanup Items [see map book comparison of existing and proposed at www.cstx.gov/devservices] From To 1a 1,7 Hensel Street College Avenue Texas Avenue Realign Minor Collector on west to College Avenue at Cross Street and extend to east to intersect Texas Avenue at Rosemary Drive as per 2017 Texas A&M University Campus Master Plan. Roadway on Texas A&M property, alignment shown for planning purposes. Add bike lanes as per 2017 TAMU Campus Master Plan Add sidewalks as per 2017 TAMU Campus Master Plan 1b 1,7 Front Street University Drive Hensel Street Remove Minor Collector as not provided as part of Century Square development.None Remove sidewalks as roadway is removed 2 2 Future Minor Collector University Drive East Harvey Road Remove as either located on Veterans Park or Texas A&M University System tract, would not have connections to Veterans Park or Crescent Pointe subdivision.None Remove sidewalks 3 2 Summit Crossing thoroughfares and extensions Harvey Road University Drive Adjust Summit Crossing Lane and future minor collector as per Summit Crossing Master Plan and realign to existing median breaks on University Drive East at East Crest Drive and on Bonneville Road at Hicks Lane. Adjust bike lanes to proposed alignments Adjust sidewalks to proposed alignments 4 5,17 Thoroughfares in Grimes County Remove future thoroughfares from plan as Inter-Local Agreement regarding subdivision review not in place with Grimes County. Remove bike route on Peack Creek Road extension and SH 30 None 5 6,7 Finfeather Road/Agronomy Road Raymond Stotzer Pkwy Bryan City limits Add as Major Collector as is on City of Bryan Thoroughfare Plan and as per cross section in 2017 Texas A&M University Campus Master Plan. 6a 7 College Main University Drive Bryan City limits Reclassify from Major Collector to Minor Collector as constructed and remove section from University Drive to Church Avenue which is a pedestrian mall. 6b 7 Boyett Street University Drive Louise Avenue Add as Minor Collector intersecting University Drive to replace College Main. 7a 7 Fairview Avenue George Bush Drive Holleman Drive Reclassify from Major Collector to Minor Collector as per Southside Area Neighborhood Plan. 7b 7 Montclair Avenue George Bush Drive Luther Street Reclassify from Major Collector to Minor Collector as per Southside Area Neighborhood Plan. 8 8 Corsair Drive Emerald Parkway Pavilion Avenue Add remaining portion of Corsair Drive and reclassify from Major Collector to Minor Collector as constructed.Add bike lanes None 9a 8 Pavilion Avenue SH 6 Sebesta Road Reclassify from Major Collector to Minor Collector as constructed.Adjust bike lanes None 9b 8 Pavilion Avenue extension Sebesta Road SH 6 Adjust alignment to consider approved Brazos Valley Auto Complex preliminary plan.Adjust bike lanes Adjust sidewalks 10a 12 River Road/Lost Trail extensions Lightsey Lane Brazos River Remove future Minor Collector extension as no longer crossing Brazos River. 10b 12 Paint Trail extension Paint Trail Brazos River Remove future Minor Collector extension as no longer crossing Brazos River. 10c 12 Lightsey Lane Raymond Stotzer Pkwy River Road Add as Minor Collector to connect existing River Road with future Lightsey Lane extension north of Raymond Stotzer Parkway. 11 13 North Dowling Road realignment Holleman Drive S Luther Street West extension Adjust as constructed with realignment and through movement planned to Holleman Drive South via Junction Boys Road. Change bike lanes to multi- use path and adjust as constructed Adjust sidewalks as constructed 12 13 Mission Ranch minor collectors Adjust alignment of Deacon Drive West, Feather Run, and Cameron Oaks Lane as per approved Mission Ranch preliminary plan. Change bike lanes to bike route on Cameron Oaks Lane and Feather Run north of Deacon and adjust all facilities Remove sidewalks on Cameron Oaks Lane and Feather Run from Kerr Valley Lane to Quail Run subdivision None None None None None None None None Proposed Pedestrian Changes Change #Page #Thoroughfare Extent Proposed Thoroughfare Change Description Proposed Bicycle Changes # Proposed Thoroughfare Plan Update with Bicycle and Pedestrian-Related Changes Changes Initiated by the City including Cleanup Items [see map book comparison of existing and proposed at www.cstx.gov/devservices] From To Proposed Pedestrian Changes Change #Page #Thoroughfare Extent Proposed Thoroughfare Change Description Proposed Bicycle Changes # 13 13 General Parkway Holleman Drive S Aspen Heights development Adjust alignment of General Parkway as constructed with Aspen Heights project.Adjust bike lanes to existing alignment Adjust sidewalks to existing alignment 14 13 Cain Road Realign Cain Road to intersect Holleman Drive South at Paloma Ridge Drive.Realign bike lanes Realign sidewalks 15 14 Deacon Drive Welsh Avenue Wellborn Road Reclassify from Minor Collector to Major Collector as constructed. 16a 14 General Parkway extension Rock Prairie Road West William D. Fitch Parkway extension Add future Minor Collector extension south of Rock Prairie Road West and North Graham Road to tie into new 4-lane Major Arterial.Add bike lanes Add sidewalks 16b 14 Old Wellborn Road Rock Prairie Road West North Graham Road Remove as Minor Collector as General Parkway extension will provide thoroughfare access south to North Graham Road.None Remove sidewalks 16c 14 North Graham Road Old Wellborn Road General Parkway extension Remove as Major Collector as not needed to tie North Graham Road into Old Wellborn Road due to General Parkway extension to south.Remove bike lanes Remove sidewalks 17a 14 Scott & White Boulevard SH 6 Rock Prairie Road Reclassify from Major Collector to Minor Collector as constructed, roadway flares out with turn lane at Rock Prairie Road. 17b 14 Healing Way Scott & White Blvd Lakeway Drive Reclassify from Major Collector to Minor Collector as constructed. 17c 14 Medical Avenue Lakeway Drive Rock Prairie Road Reclassify from Major Collector to Minor Collector as constructed, roadway flares out with turn lane at Rock Prairie Road. 17d 14,15 Lakeway Drive Medical Avenue Spring Creek Reclassify from Major Collector to 4-lane Minor Arterial to reflect 4-lane boulevard section within College Station Medical District PDD. 18a 14,15 Future Major Collector SH 6 Lakeway Drive Remove portin of future Major Collector as per Kimley Horn thoroughfare assessment.Remove bike lanes as roadway is removed Remove sidewalks as roadway is removed 18b 14,15 Barron Road extension SH 6 Rock Prairie Road Remove 4-lane future Minor Arterial as per Kimley Horn thoroughfare assessment and prior alignment study over closed landfill near SH 6. Remove bike lanes as roadway is removed Remove sidewalks as roadway is removed 18c 15 Future Minor Collector Bird Pond Road extension Pebble Creek Parkway extension Remove future Minor Collector portion crossing Spring Creek as per Kimley Horn thoroughfare assessment and realign remaining section to Rock Prairie Road at Harris Drive. Realign bike lanes Realign sidewalks 19 14,20 Barron Cut-off Road WS Phillips Parkway William D. Fitch Parkway Add Minor Collector to reflect roadway extension as constructed. 20 15 Tower Point Future Major Collector Arrington Road SH 6 Remove Major Collector as already platted and developed with private drive aisle. 21 15,21 Birkdale Drive St. Andrews Drive SH 6 Realign to existing roadway as constructed and around dormant oil/gas well site.Realign and extend bike lanes Realign and extend sidewalks 22 18,23, 28 Thoroughfares in Burleson County Remove thoroughfares due to Inter-Local Agreement with Burleson County not requiring City subdivision review, also mostly in Brazos River floodplain. 23 20 Etonbury Avenue Greens Prairie Road Barron Cut-Off Road Reclassify from Major Collector to Minor Collector, and adjust to existing section in Castlegate II subdivision constructed as Minor Collector with Major Collector right-of- way. Adjust bike lanes Adjust sidewalks 24a 20 Long Creek Lane Greens Prairie Trail Cottonwood Creek Lane Remove as Minor Collector as street is constructed as local street in Creek Meadows subdivision. 24b 20 Cottonwood Creek Lane Long Creek Lane Timber Creek Lane Remove as Minor Collector as street is constructed as local street in Creek Meadows subdivision. 24c 20 Timber Creek Lane/Timber Drive Greens Prairie Trail Cottonwood Creek Lane Remove as Minor Collector as street is constructed as local street in Creek Meadows subdivision. 24d 20 Creek Meadow Blvd North Greens Prairie Trail Cottonwood Creek Lane Remove as Minor Collector as is boulevard entrances that does not connect through to another thoroughfare. None None None None None None None None None None None Holleman Drive S None Proposed Thoroughfare Plan Update with Bicycle and Pedestrian-Related Changes Changes Initiated by the City including Cleanup Items [see map book comparison of existing and proposed at www.cstx.gov/devservices] From To Proposed Pedestrian Changes Change #Page #Thoroughfare Extent Proposed Thoroughfare Change Description Proposed Bicycle Changes # 24e 20 Wild Creek Court and extension Cottonwood Creek Lane Future Minor Collector Remove as Minor Collector as street is constructed as local street in Creek Meadows subdivision, extends south to another Future Minor Collector. Remove bike route on extension section as roadway is removed None 25 21 Margraves/Windham Tracts Future Minor Collectors Adjust location of second Future Minor Collector to be more evenly spaced on Arrington Road between Harpers Ferry Road and Indian Lakes Drive. Change all bike routes to bike lanes for all future minor collectors Add sidewalks to all future minor collectors 26 21 Lakeway Drive extension SH 6 Birkdale Drive Reclassify future Minor Collector from SH 6 to Future 4-lane Minor Arterial as Major Collector and realign to Lakeway Drive extension to remove offset.Realign bike lanes Realign sidewalks 27 21 Southern Pointe collectors Adjust alignment of planned Mather Parkway and Darlington Avenue as per approved Southern Pointe preliminary plan. Adjust bike lanes to proposed alignment Adjust sidewalks to proposed alignment 28a 24 Straub Road Wellborn Road I&GN Road Remove as Minor Collector as railroad crossing closed by Union Pacific.Remove bike route as roadway is removed None 28b 24 Wade Road Wellborn Road Stousland Road Remove as Minor Collector as railroad crossing closed by Union Pacific.None None 28c 24 Future Minor Collector Wellborn Road Future Minor Arterial Remove as Minor Collector as additional railroad crossing not likely between Greens Prairie Trail and Drake Drive. Remove bike route as roadway is removed None 28d 24 Saddle Creek Drive Stousland Road Vintage Oaks Drive Add as Minor Collector as constructed to connect existing roadway as a Minor Collector to other thoroughfares.Add bike route None 28e 24,25, 28 Future Minor Collector Wellborn Road Future Western Arterial Loop Remove as Minor Collector as additional railroad crossing not likely between Drake Drive and the Future Minor Arterial to the south. 29 26,27 Future Major Collector Future Western Freeway Loop SH 6 Add future Major Collector extension to existing SH 6 grade separation between FM 159 and Westward Ho. 30 28 Stousland Road extension Future Western Arterial Loop Future Western Freeway Loop Remove future Minor Collector west of Future Western Arterial loop, constrained by floodplain and intersects Future Western Freeway loop. None None None Planning & Development Services  1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960  College Station, TX 77840 Office 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM November 16, 2017 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Jason Schubert, AICP, Transportation Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Amendment to UDO Section 1.6 – Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 1.6, "Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas to recognize locational flexibility to ensure consistency among various City master plan components and clarify that plan depictions may be updated as development occurs. Case #ORDA2017-000015 Background: Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Section 1.6 – Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan states the UDO is intended to implement the City’s planning policy as provided in the City’s Comprehensive Plan and associated plans. As part of that section, it describes that the thoroughfare and bikeway alignments depicted in their related plans are generalized locations and authorizes discretion for those elements to be further refined as needed up to a distance of 1,000 feet without necessitating an ordinance amendment. As part of reviewing thoroughfares for the proposed Thoroughfare Plan update, it was identified that several thoroughfares remain depicted as conceptually shown in the 2009 Comprehensive Plan though development plans and surrounding conditions have provided further refinement when implemented. Furthermore, this section states thoroughfares and bikeways have locational discretion though does not list other public infrastructure and facilities that generally follow them, or that are conceptual in nature as well. The proposed amendment seeks to:  Clarify the refinement discretion of 1,000 feet applies to the Comprehensive Plan and all related master plans (i.e. Water Master Plan, etc.);  Identify the Administrator as holding the discretion to authorize the refinements; and  Clarify that staff may update GIS layers, etc. as plans are approved and constructed to reflect refinements when determined and implemented to keep the information current. The proposed ordinance amendment is scheduled for consideration by City Council at their November 20, 2017 meeting to accompany the proposed update to the Thoroughfare Plan. Supporting Materials: 1. Ordinance Redline UDO Section 1.6. - Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan A. It is intended that this UDO implement the City's planning policies as adopted as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended and periodically updated. B. The City's Comprehensive Plan, and any associated plans or studies adopted by the City Council, shall be required to be amended prior to, or concurrent with, permitting development which would conflict with such plan. C. The alignments of proposed thoroughfares, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and other public facilities and infrastructure described and/or depicted as part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and associated master plans or studies and bikeways on the "College Station Thoroughfare Plan map" and the "College Station Bikeway and Pedestrian Plan map" are generalized locations that are subject to modifications to fit local conditions, budget constraints, and right-of-way and easement availability that warrant further refinement as development occurs. Alignments approved by the Administrator that are within one thousand (1,000) feet of the alignment described and/or shown on the aforementioned mapsadopted plan documents will not require a thoroughfare planan ordinance amendment to the associated plan. The Administrator may update Geographical Information Systems (GIS) map layers and other representations within the aforementioned discretion to reflect existing, approved or studied conditions as development occurs.