HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/03/2017 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionPlanning and Zoning Commission Workshop
College Station, TX
Meeting Agenda - Final
City Hall
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, TX 77840
The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning
Commission Workshop Meeting.
City Hall Council Chambers6:00 PMThursday, August 3, 2017
1. Call the meeting to order.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff.
*Final Plat ~ Minor Plat ~ The Cottages of College Station Phase 2
Block 1 Lot 1RR ~ Case #FP2017-000019
17-04044.
Sponsors:Thomas
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the
consideration of the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached).
17-04185.
Sponsors:Golbabai
2017 Plan of WorkAttachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding block
length and perimeter requirements as a part of the 2017 P&Z Plan
of Work.
17-03946.
Sponsors:Golbabai
MemoAttachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z
Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
*Thursday, August 10, 2017 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council
Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison -
Williamson)
*Thursday, August 17, 2017 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~
Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m.
17-04067.
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update
on the following items:
*A Comprehensive Plan Amendment for approximately 28 acres at
2338 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South from Natural Areas Reserved
& Urban to General Commercial. The Planning & Zoning
Commission heard this item on July 6, 2017 and voted (6-0) to
17-04078.
Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 7/28/2017
August 3, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Workshop
Meeting Agenda - Final
recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on July 27,
2017 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
*A Rezoning for approximately 28 acres 2338 Harvey Mitchell
Parkway South from General Suburban, Planned Mixed -Use
Development, Corridor Overlay & Office to General Commercial,
Multi-Family & Natural Areas Preserved. The Planning & Zoning
Commission heard this item on July 6, 2017 and voted (6-0) to
recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on July 27,
2017 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
*A Comprehensive Plan Amendment for approximately seven
acres at 2381 Earl Rudder Freeway South from Suburban
Commercial to General Commercial. The Planning & Zoning
Commission
heard this item on July 6, 2017 and voted (6-0) to recommend
approval. The City Council heard this item on July 27, 2017 and
voted (4-3) to approve the request.
*A Rezoning for approximately three acres at 2381 Earl Rudder
Freeway South from Suburban Commercial to General
Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item
on July 6, 2017 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City
Council heard this item on July 27, 2017 and voted (4-3) to approve
the request.
*A Comprehensive Plan Amendment for approximately 100 acres
located along the east side of State Highway 6, south of the
Business Park at College Station and north of the Texas World
Speedway property from General Suburban to General
Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item
on July 6, 2017 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City
Council heard this item on July 27, 2017 and voted (7-0) to approve
the request.
*A Rezoning for approximately 31 acres at 4002 University Drive
East from Rural to General Commercial. The Planning & Zoning
Commission heard this item on July 6, 2017 and voted (6-0) to
recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on July 27,
2017 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
*A Rezoning for approximately one acre in College Hills Estates
from General Suburban to General Commercial. The Planning &
Zoning Commission heard this item on July 6, 2017 and voted (6-0)
to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on July
27, 2017 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
*A Rezoning for approximately eight acres at 1501 Earl Rudder
Freeway South from Commercial Industrial to General Commercial .
The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 6,
Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 7/28/2017
August 3, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Workshop
Meeting Agenda - Final
2017 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council
heard this item on July 27, 2017 and voted (7-0) to approve the
request.
*An Ordinance Amendment to the Single -Family Landscape
Requirements. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item
on July 6, 2017 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City
Council heard this item on July 27, 2017 and voted (7-0) to approve
the request.
9. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design
Review Board, BioCorridor Board.
10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement
of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting.
11. Adjourn.
The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on
this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion .
An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion.
APPROVED
_____________________
City Manager
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101
Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on July 28, 2017 at 5:00 p.m.
_____________________
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this
meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as
interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary ’s Office at
(979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989 , or email adaassistance@cstx .gov at least
two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made .
If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting,
the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried
Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an
Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 7/28/2017
August 3, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Workshop
Meeting Agenda - Final
Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con
Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de
mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H,
Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben
entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 4 College Station, TX Printed on 7/28/2017
Page 1 of 5
2017 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work Comprehensive Plan Items Implementation of Adopted Plans Summary: Implementation of adopted master plans and neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely: Central College Station, Eastgate, Southside Area, Wellborn Community, and South Knoll Area neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian & Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste Water, Medical District, and Economic Development master plans.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion: Thoroughfare Plan Update Summary: Project Dates: The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is in the process of updating its Concept Map for the BCS region. Once adopted by the MPO, the city is anticipating taking action to amend the Thoroughfare Plan to align with the changes in the MPO’s regional Concept Map.
06/15/17: Provide an update on the BCS Thoroughfare Concept Map as adopted by the MPO and provide information on the City’s next steps to amend the current Thoroughfare Master Plan. Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (JS)
Staff Assigned: Jason Schubert Initiated: June 15, 2017 Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan Update Summary: Bring additional updates to the Planning and Zoning Commission as the Master Plan update moves forward.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Venessa Garza Anticipated Completion:
Page 2 of 5
Neighborhood Integrity Items *Traffic Calming Toolkit Summary: Receive information regarding the current traffic calming policy and devices (speed pillows, etc.), and including updates as recommended by the Council Transportation and Mobility Committee. Additionally receive update on the implementation of the neighborhood parking toolbox created by the Neighborhood Transportation Task Force.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Troy Rother & Jason Schubert Anticipated Completion: January 2017
Student Housing in Established Single-Family Neighborhoods Summary: Research best practices from peer university communities regarding the management of student housing in single-family neighborhoods. Explore the possibility of expanding options for Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO), mitigate the impacts to on-street parking and drainage and provide educational opportunities for Homeowner’s Associations and Neighborhood Associations
Project Dates: 4/20/17: Follow up discussion regarding the presentation on student housing in established single-family neighborhoods. 8/17/17: Presentation on Neighborhood Services (Barbara Moore)
Staff Assigned: Jenifer Paz, Rachel Lazo & Jade Broadnax Anticipated Completion: October 2017
Page 3 of 5
UDO Regulatory Items Evaluation of UDO Regulations Summary: Project Dates: Review UDO requirements that add minimal value as identified by staff and consider opportunities to reduce regulations and streamline processes.
06/01/17 Presentation of staff's initial list of identified opportunities to reduce regulations and streamline processes. 06/15/2017: Comprehensive Plans and Rezoning staff reports revised to new coversheet format. 7/6/2017: Presentation of Draft UDO Amendments to eliminate certain screening requirements and eliminate the visual treatment for exposed concrete. 8/3/2017: Presentation of Draft UDO Amendment on Off-Street Parking Requirements which includes the elimination of large parking lot concepts and allowing laydown curbs adjacent to buildings. Also, Preliminary Plan and Final Plat staff reports revised to new abbreviated format. Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Initiation: June 1, 2017 Sign Ordinance Revisions Summary: Review and update the City’s sign ordinance in light of the recent Supreme Court decision regarding sign regulations based upon content.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Molly Hitchcock, Rachel Lazo & Legal Anticipated Completion: December 2017
Update on Off-Street Parking Requirements Summary: Provide options to allow flexibility to off-street parking requirements. Receive direction on future UDO text amendments.
Project Dates: 5/4/17: Additional presentation and discussion on potential amendments or additions to the City’s current off-street parking requirements. 8/3/2017: Presentation of Draft UDO Amendments to 12-7.3 Off-Street Parking Requirements.
Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Completion: August 3, 2017
Page 4 of 5
Suburban Commercial Land Use and Zoning Summary: Under City Council direction, review current Comprehensive Plan land use description and zoning ordinance requirements of the Suburban Commercial zoning district and provide options for future text amendments.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Madison Thomas, Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton Anticipated Completion: September 2017
Bicycle Rack Standards Summary: Under City Council direction, review current non-residential parking requirements for providing on-site bicycle parking facilities.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Alaina Helton & Madison Thomas Anticipated Completion: September 7, 2017
Non-Residential Landscaping Requirements Summary: Review current city landscaping requirements (including streetscaping and buffer standards) and the water usage needed to maintain current landscaping requirements. Explore options for water-conserving landscaping.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Rachel Lazo, Madison Thomas, Jade Broadnax Anticipated Completion: December 2017
On-Going Items Economic Development Updates Summary: Receive regular updates from the Economic Development Department regarding the vision and implementation of the commercialization of TAMU research-related output, including examples of successful efforts elsewhere. Additionally, receive an update on the recent announcement regarding plans for the TAMU System Rellis Campus revitalization effort.
Project Dates: 06/15/17: Presentation of a quarterly update on Economic Development efforts and land availability for commercial uses. Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (NR)
Staff Assigned: Economic Development Anticipated Completion: On-Going
Page 5 of 5
Semi-Annual Review of Pre-Application Conference Surveys Summary: Provide an update on the survey results from the Pre-Application Conference process.
Project Dates: 3/16/17: Provided an update on the status of the PAC meeting process and implementation of the PAC survey. Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (MB) Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Completion: On-Going Educational/informational Items Parkland Dedication Summary: Review of parkland dedication requirements and available resources.
Project Dates: 7/6/17: Staff presented information regarding parkland dedication requirements and summary or parks and greenways master plan. Staff Assigned: Jenifer Paz Completed: July 6, 2017 Sidewalk Fee-in-Lieu Summary: Review of sidewalk fund requirements and available resources.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Lauren Hovde & Rachel Lazo Anticipated Completion: September 2017 Block Length and Block Perimeter Summary: Review of current requirements regarding block length and block perimeter.
Project Dates: Presentation of a review of current requirements regarding block length and block perimeter. Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai & Jason Schubert Anticipated Completion: August 3, 2017
Public Hearing Notifications Summary: Review current community notification requirements and practices for cases involving a public hearing.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Lance Simms Anticipated Completion: October 2017 Mueller Report Update Summary: Update on the implementation of the 2013 Organizational Review of P&DS (AKA “Mueller Report”)
Project Dates: 07/20/17: Presentation of an update on the implementation of the Mueller Report.
Staff Assigned: Lance Simms Completed: July 20, 2017 Review of Development Fees Summary: Evaluation of the effect of development fees on the price of single family housing to the homeowner and an overview of the financial context of development fees for the City.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai & Alaina Helton Anticipated Completion: November 2017
Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77840 Office 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM July 21, 2017 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Justin Golbabai, AICP, CNU-A, Planning Administrator Jason Schubert, AICP, Transportation Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Plan of Work Update – Block Length and Perimeter Requirements Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding block length and perimeter requirements as a part of the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work. Background: This presentation is to provide an overview of the City of College Station’s block length and perimeter requirements. The presentation will also include discussions on the principles of street connectivity as it relates to land use and transportation patterns. This item is intended to help cultivate discussion and serve as an educational and informational item as part of the the 2017 Plan of Work.
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
College Station, TX
Meeting Agenda - Final
City Hall
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, TX 77840
The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning
Commission Regular Meeting.
City Hall Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, August 3, 2017
1. Call meeting to order.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Hear Citizens.
At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the
Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen
presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who
wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the
agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into
the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is
made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.)
All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans
and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision
regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff
recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any
Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to
the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
4. Consent Agenda
Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting
minutes.
*July 20, 2017 ~ Workshop
*July 20, 2017 ~ Regular
17-04034.1
July 20 2017 Workshop
July 20 2017 Regular
Attachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat
for the Gandy Subdivision consisting of 2 lots and .22 acres of
right-of-way dedication on approximately 16 acres located at 3610
Longmire, generally located at the southwest corner of Longmire
and Graham. Case #FPCO2017-000010
17-04124.2
Sponsors:Lazo
Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 7/28/2017
August 3, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
Staff Report
Aerial
Gandy Application
Final Plat
Attachments:
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a waiver request
to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 12-8.3.I.2 'Utility
Easements' and a presentation, possible action, and discussion on
a Preliminary Plan for the Turkey Creek Subdivision consisting of 2
lots on approximately 17.8 acres generally located at the north east
corner of the intersection of Raymond Stotzer Parkway and Turkey
Creek Road. Case #PP2017-000004
17-04116.
Sponsors:Helton
Staff Report
Waiver Request
Aerial
Application
Copy of Preliminary Plan
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan -
Future Land Use & Character Map from Suburban Commercial to
General Commercial for approximately 1.3 acres being situated in
the Plantation Oaks Addition, Block 1, Lot 1 located at 1500 Earl
Rudder Freeway South. Case #CPA2017-000002 (Note: Final
action of this item will be considered at the August 24, 2017 City
Council meeting- subject to change.)
17-04007.
Sponsors:Paz
Staff Report
Background Information
Aerial & Land Use Exhibit
Application
Comp Plan Map
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified
Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
17-04088.
Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 7/28/2017
August 3, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
changing the zoning district boundaries from O Office to GC
General Commercial on approximately 1.3 acres of land being
situated in the Plantation Oaks Addition, Block 1, Lot 1, recorded in
Volume 11445, Page 161 of the deed records of Brazos County,
Texas, more generally located at 1500 Earl Rudder Freeway
South. Case #REZ2017-000002 (Note: Final action of this item will
be considered at the August 24, 2017 City Council meeting-
subject to change.)
Sponsors:Paz
Staff Report
Background Information
Comparison of Permitted Uses
SAM & Aerial
Application
Rezoning Map
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan -
Future Land Use & Character Map from Suburban Commercial to
General Commercial for approximately 1.7 acres located at 12055
FM 2154. Case #CPA2017-000007 (Note: Final action of this item
will be considered at the August 24, 2017 City Council meeting-
subject to change.)
17-03969.
Sponsors:Paz
Staff Report
Background Information
Aerial & Land Use Exhibit
Application
CPA Amendment Map
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified
Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to GC
General Commercial on approximately 1.7 acres of land being
situated in the Crawford Burnett League, Abstract No. 7, College
Station, Brazos County, Texas, said tract being the remainder of a
1.891 acre tract of land as described by a deed to Delph Ross
recorded in Volume 2569, Page 112 of the Official Public Records
of Brazos County, Texas, more generally located at 12055 FM
2154. Case #REZ2017-000015 (Note: Final action of this item will
17-039910.
Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 7/28/2017
August 3, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
be considered at the August 24, 2017 City Council meeting-
subject to change.)
Sponsors:Paz
Staff Report
Background Information
SAM & Aerial
Application
Rezoning Map
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an amendment to Chapter 12, “Unified Development
Ordinance”, Section 7.3 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
College Station, Texas regarding off-street parking standards.
Case #ORDA2017-000005 (Note: Final action of this item will be
considered at the August 24, 2017 City Council meeting- subject to
change.)
17-039311.
Sponsors:Golbabai
Memo
Ordinance Redline
Attachments:
12. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement
of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting.
13. Adjourn
The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on
this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion.
APPROVED
_____________________
City Manager
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101
Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on ___________, 2017 at 5:00 p.m.
_____________________
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this
Page 4 College Station, TX Printed on 7/28/2017
August 3, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as
interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at
(979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least
two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made.
If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting,
the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried
Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an
Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con
Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de
mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H,
Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben
entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 5 College Station, TX Printed on 7/28/2017
July 20, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Workshop Meeting
July 20, 2017 6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Johnny Burns, Elianor Vessali, Bill Mather, Keith Williamson
and Jeremy Osborne
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerome Rektorik
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Justin Golbabai, Jason Schubert,
Carol Cotter, Mark Bombek, Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton, Jade Broadnax, Kevin Ferrer, Anthony Armstrong,
Timothy Horn, Debbie Stickles, Mary Ann Powell, Eric Chafin and Kristen Hejny
1. Call the meeting to order.
Chairperson Kee Called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
There was general discussion on regular agenda items #6 & #8.
3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
4. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff.
*Final Plat ~ Amending Plat ~ The Science Park Subdivision Block 1, Lots 1A-3A ~ Case #FPCO2017-
000007 (Paz)
There was no discussion.
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the consideration of the 2017 P&Z Plan of work.
Senior Planner Bombek presented updates on this item to the Commission.
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the implementation of the
organizational review report prepared by Alan Mueller, consultant.
Director of Planning & Development Services Simms presented updates on the report to the
Commission.
Commissioner Osborne asked if any quantitative research has been done after implementing Mueller
report.
July 20, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
Director Simms stated that no formal research has been done, but anecdotally there has been a huge
change.
Commissioner Mather asked which body gave the authority to implement the changes once the Mueller
Report was released.
Director Simms stated that the consultant made a presentation to City Council regarding the report,
Planning & Development Services started incorporating changes as soon as report was released.
Commissioner Mather asked how the implementation success is measured.
Director Simms stated that the results from Pre-Application Conference (PAC) surveys and online
surveys, indicate a high satisfaction rate from our customers.
7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
*Thursday, July 27, 2017 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and
Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison – Osborne)
*Thursday, August 3, 2017 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular
7:00 p.m.
Chairperson Kee reviewed upcoming meetings for the Planning & Zoning Commission.
8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items:
*A Rezoning for approximately three acres located at 5101 & 5102 Pebble Creek Parkway from Rural
to General Suburban & Restricted Suburban. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on
June 15, 2017, a vote to recommend approval to Restricted Suburban passed (6-0), and a vote to
recommend approval to General Suburban failed (3-3). The City Council heard this item on July 13,
2017, and a vote to approve Restricted Suburban zoning passed (6-1) with a condition of a 25-foot buffer
against Champion’s Boulevard, and a vote to approve General Suburban zoning passed (5-2) with the
condition of a 25-foot buffer against Champion’s Boulevard.
*A Rezoning for approximately two acres located at 2849 Barron Road from Planned Development
District to Planned Development District. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July
15, 2017, and a vote to recommend approval failed (1-5). The City Council heard this item on July 13,
2017, and a vote to approve the request failed (0-7)
*A Rezoning for approximately 18 acres located on Turkey Creek Road from General Commercial &
Multi-Family to General Commercial and Multi-Family. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this
item on June 15, 2017, and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on
July 13, 2017, and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
9. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Bio
Corridor Board.
There was no discussion.
10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire
about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the
July 20, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the
subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Commissioner Mather requested variance reviews expansion to allow people to utilize variance requests
without a Board meeting.
11. Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:54 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
______________________________ ________________________________
Jane Kee, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin. Support Specialist
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
July 20, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 5
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
July 20, 2017, 7:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Johnny Burns, Elianor Vessali, Bill Mather, Keith
Williamson and Jeremy Osborne
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerome Rektorik
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Justin Golbabai, Jason Schubert,
Carol Cotter, Mark Bombek, Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton, Jade Broadnax, Kevin Ferrer, Anthony Armstrong,
Timothy Horn, Debbie Stickles, Mary Ann Powell, Eric Chafin and Kristen Hejny
1. Call Meeting to Order
Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Hear Citizens
Emily Cowen, 603 Guernsey Street, College Station, addressed the Commission regarding a
Historic Southside home.
Shirley Dupriest, 400 Fairview Avenue, College Station, spoke on an update from the Southside
Advocacy Group regarding a rezoning application on a Fairview Avenue property.
4. Consent Agenda
4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from meetings.
*Casey Oldham ~ July 20, 2017
4.2 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes as amended.
*July 6, 2017 Workshop
*July 6, 2017 Regular
4.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Castlegate II Subdivision
Section 210 consisting of 71 single-family lots and four common areas on approximately 25 acres,
generally located southwest of Castlegate II Subdivision Section 205. Case #FP2016-000029.
4.4 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for The Crossing at Lick Creek
Phase 2 consisting of 43 residential lots and two common area lots on approximately 22 acres
located at 13500 Rock Prairie Road, generally located south of William D. Fitch Parkway and west
of Williams Creek Subdivision. Case #FP2016-000018
July 20, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 5
4.5 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Rio Grande Subdivision
consisting of 67 residential lots and two common area lots on approximately 7.24 acres located at
2021 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, generally located northeast of the intersection of Harvey
Mitchell Parkway South with Rio Grande Boulevard and west of Southwood Drive. Case #FP2015-
000004
4.6 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Harvey Road Subdivision
Phase 1 consisting of 1 lot and common area on approximately 17 acres located at 3210 Harvey
Road generally located west of the intersection of State Highway 30 and Linda Lane. Case
#FP2017-000009
Commissioner Williamson motioned to approve Consent Agenda Item 4.1 as amended and
items 4.2 - 4.6. Commissioner Mather seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by
Commission Action.
No items were removed.
6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from
PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District for approximately eight
acres in the Chimney Hill Retail Plaza Lots 1-4, Block 1, generally located at 701 & 715 University
Drive East. Case #REZ2017-000013 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the August 10,
2017 City Council meeting – subject to change)
Senior Planner Bombek presented the Rezoning to the Commission and recommended approval with
the condition that a sidewalk be provided along Tarrow Street.
Commissioner Mather asked if the development is planning to have structured parking.
Senior Planner Bombek stated that the development is planning to provide both surface and structure
parking.
Applicant, Crissy Hartl, 3204 Earl Rudder Freeway South, was available to present to Commission.
Commissioner Mather asked for clarification on the waiver requested area and the linear feet of the
sidewalk.
Ms. Hartl clarified the waiver area, and stated that it is about 1,500 feet, with an interior network of
sidewalks.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
July 20, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 5
Wade Barkman, 701 University Drive East #406, College Station, was available to give a brief
history of this project, and to support the redirection of development.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
Hunter Goodwin, 1011 Lyceum Court, College Station, was available to answer questions regarding
the rezoning request.
Commissioner Mather motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning as requested by the
applicant. Commissioner Burns seconded the motion, the motion passed (6-0).
7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from
R Rural to GC General Commercial on approximately 35.91 acres of land being situated in the J.W.
Scott Survey, Abstract No. 49 in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, located at 4000 and 4002
University Drive East, and more generally located south of the intersection of University Drive East
and FM 158 at the College Station city limit line. Case #REZ2017-000016 (Note: Final action on
this item is scheduled for the July 27, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change)
Economic Development Manager Prochazka presented the Rezoning to the Commission and
recommended approval.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
No one spoke.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Osborne motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning. Commissioner
Mather seconded the motion, the motion passed (6-0).
8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from
GS General Suburban to GC General Commercial for approximately one acre of land being College
Hills Estates Block 18, Lots 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11, more generally located at 108, 110, 200 & 206 George
Bush Drive East. Case #REZ2017-000017 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the July
27, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change)
Economic Development Manager Prochazka presented the Rezoning to the Commission and
recommended approval.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
No one spoke.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
July 20, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5
Commissioner Burns motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning. Commissioner
Williamson seconded the motion, the motion passed (6-0).
9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from
CI Commercial Industrial to GC General Commercial on approximately 8.158 acres of land located
at 1501 Earl Rudder Freeway South, and more generally located on the east side of Earl Rudder
Freeway, north of Harvey Road. Case #REZ2017-000018 (Note: Final action on this item is
scheduled for the July 27, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change)
Economic Development Manager Prochazka presented the Rezoning to the Commission and
recommended approval.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
No one spoke.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Williamson motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning. Commissioner
Osborne seconded the motion, the motion passed (6-0).
10. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the
Comprehensive Plan – Future Land Use & Character Map from General Suburban and Business
Park to General Commercial for approximately 100 acres located along the east side of State
Highway 6, south of The Business Park at College Station and north of the Texas World Speedway
property. Case #CPA2017-000008 and #CPA2017-000009 (Note: Final action on this item is
scheduled for the July 27, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change)
Economic Development Manager Prochazka presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the
Commission and recommended approval.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
No one spoke.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Osborne motioned to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment. Commissioner Burns seconded the motion, the motion passed (6-0).
11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire
about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or
the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to
place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
12. Adjourn
July 20, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5
The meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
______________________________ ________________________________
Jane Kee, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Planning & Zoning Commission
August 3, 2017
Scale 2 lots and .22 acres of right-of-way dedication on
approximately 16 acres
Location 3610 Longmire; Southwest corner of Longmire Drive and
Graham Road
Applicant Brian Huffaker, Hawkins Companies LLC
Project Manager Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner
rlazo@cstx.gov
Project Overview The property owner is pursuing this final plat in order to
take steps towards developing Lot 1 as a charter school.
Preliminary Plan Approved July 6, 2017
Parkland Dedication Not required
Impact Fees Subject to citywide impact fees—water, sanitary sewer,
and roadway. Impact fees will be dependent upon timing
of the building permit application date.
Traffic Impact Analysis Not required
Compliant with Comprehensive Plan
(including Master Plans) and Unified
Development Ordinance
Yes
Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes
Staff Recommendation Approval
Supporting Materials
1. Aerial
2. Application
3. Copy of Final Plat
Final Plat
For
Gandy Subdivision
Block 1, Lots 1 & 2
FPCO2017-000010
Name of Project:GANDY SUBDIVISION
Address:3610 LONGMIRE DR
Legal Description:A005401, R STEVENSON (ICL), TRACT 31, 16.715 ACRES
Applicant::
Property Owner:TOLSON R B & MYRTLE L & MARY B
HAWKINS COMPANIES LLC, BRIAN HUFFAKER
Total Acreage:16.22
Requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if
applicable):
N/A
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of
the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
N/A
Total No. of Lots:2
ROW Acreage:0.22
Existing Use:Vacant
Floodplain Acreage:N/A
Special Flood Hazard Area?No there are no Special Flood Hazard Areas on the property
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Page 1 of 2
The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantional property right of the
applicant.
N/A
The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, orinjurious to
other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
N/A
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
N/A
Requested Oversize Participation:
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
N/A
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat, if applicable:
No. of acres to be dedicated:
No. of acres in detention:
N/ANo. of acres in floodplain:
N/A
N/A
No. of acres in greenways:N/A
Parkland Development Fee:N/A
Parks & Recreation Advisory Board approval date: N/A
Page 2 of 2
HERRING, MARY ELIZABETHCALLED 10 ACRESVOL. 148, PG. 300MARCH 22, 1951JK DEVELOPMENT, L.L.P.CALLED 21.00 ACRESVOL. 2539, PG. 71L16L17L18L19WHITE DOVE TRAIL~50' ROWDOVE LANDINGAVENUE~50' ROWLOT 5R-2,BLOCK ONE1.727 ACRESLOT 6R-1,BLOCK ONE2.613 ACRESLOT 31LOT 30LOT 29LOT 28LOT 11LOT 10BRIDLE C
O
U
R
T
BRIDLE GATEESTATESPHASE TWOVOL. 6130, PG. 67BRIDLE GATEESTATESPHASE ONEVOL. 3744, PG. 49GRAHAM CORNER PLAZAVOL. 11752, PG. 293GRAHAM CORNER PLAZAVOL. 11558, PG. 176LO
N
G
M
I
R
E
D
R
I
V
E
~
7
0
'
R
.
O
.
W
.
(4
8
'
W
I
D
E
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
)
BRIDLE T
R
A
I
L
S
C
O
U
R
T LICK CREEKDOVE CROSSINGPHASE 8VOL. 8605, PG. 224PLATTEDL1
L2
L3L4
14
1
.
8
1
'
T
O
U
E
1
5.22'32.66'243.36'HAI LESUBDIVISION1.02 ACVOL. 12249, PG. 127HAI LESUBDIVISION1.62 ACVOL. 12249,PG. 127HAI LESUBDIVISION1.02 ACVOL. 12249, PG. 127HAI LESUBDIVISION1.62 ACVOL. 12249,PG. 127GRAHAM ROAD~70' R.O.W.(48' WIDE CONCRETE PAVEMENT)S48°25'09"E124.43'N42°17'42"E~218.99'S83°43'32"E33.88'N77°00'29"E~111.70'N54°12'39"E27.16'N41°34'51"E66.89'S1
0
°
1
8
'
1
7
"
E
~
2
0
8
.
9
4
'S41°31'21"W~520.92'N47°43'15"W~167.78'
C3
C2
S34°56'3
3
"
E
~
1
3
7
.
1
4
'
N48°20'02"W~810.06'L8N41°34'51"E~431.18'L11C1 43.99'S1
0
°
1
8
'
1
7
"
E
~
2
0
8
.
9
4
'
C4 25.0'UE1UE2UE3 UE4UE5
UE6UE7SS
E
1SSE2SSE3SS
E
4
N1
1
°
5
2
'
5
1
"
W
1
1
8
.
3
5
'S42°17'02"W55.76'S74°42'28"E~132.13'S74°42'28"E~132.13'S41°40'41"W~92.17'S48°19'19"E~286.58'
S48°20'02"E~800.20'S47°43'15"E~157.62'DE1DE2DE3DE4DE5DE6DE7DE8DE9DE10DE11DE12
L6L775.0'N41°34'51"E~465.06'L5
L10N86°35'30"E~35.35'L9N41°34'51"E~5.32'C6 L12C5 S41°34'51"W~465.07'S41°34'51"W~426.19'S74°33'04"E51.77'S74°42'28"E~132.13'"T" FENCE POSTON-LINEBARBEDWIRE FENCEWOOD FENCEBARBEDWIRE FENCEBARBEDWIRE FENCECITY OF BRYAN
60' WIDE ELECTRICAL EASEMENT
VOL. 213, PG. 511 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION20' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTVOL. 937, PG. 17(PORTION TO BE ABANDONED)CITY OF COLLEGE STATIONDRAINAGE EASEMENT NO. CE-20.095 ACREVOL. 5785, PG. 17320' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTVOL. 8605, PG. 224PLATTED
1/2" IRON ROD & CAP FOUND ATEAST CORNER 0.7481 AC. ESMTP
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
C
O
I
N
C
I
D
E
N
T
W
/
E
S
M
T
L
I
N
ECITY OF COLLEGE STATIONDRAINAGE EASEMENT0.7481 ACREVOL. 3440, PG. 8020' WIDE PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENT10' WIDE PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENTHATCHED PORTIONTO BE ABANDONED20' WIDE PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENT20' WIDE PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENTCALCULATED100 YR.WATERSURFACEELEVATIONCALCULATED 100 YR.WATER SURFACEELEVATION20' WIDE PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENTVARIABLE WIDTH PRIVATEDRAINAGE EASEMENT10' WIDE PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENT15' WIDE PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENT20' WIDE PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENT10' WIDE PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENT25.0'S48°19'19"E~0.89'S41°40'41"W~3.99'S41°40'41"W~10.28'CURVE TABLE:Curve #C1C2C3C4C5C6Length163.77'147.83'52.78'56.43'144.43'163.83'Radius466.41'466.41'535.00'540.00'461.41'461.41'Delta20°07'07"18°09'36"5°39'07"5°59'16"17°56'05"20°20'37"Chord BearingN38°31'27"WS19°23'05"ES13°07'51"ES13°17'55"EN19°16'20"WN38°24'40"WChord Distance162.93'147.21'52.75'56.41'143.84'162.97'20' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT TABLELine #UE1UE2UE3UE4UE5UE6UE7Length87.25326.03213.8520.06200.59317.0589.21DirectionS81° 42' 53"WS66° 32' 55"WS53° 01' 48"EN41° 34' 51"ES53° 01' 48"EN66° 32' 55"EN81° 42' 53"E15' WIDE SAN. SEWER SERVICE EASEMENTLine #SSE1SSE2SSE3SSE4Length128.317.417.72125.80DirectionN16° 50' 07"WS81° 42' 53"WS66° 32' 55"WN16° 50' 07"WVARIABLE WIDTH PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTLine #DE1DE2DE3DE4DE5DE6DE7DE8DE9DE10DE11DE12Length54.3431.29203.6475.24152.7755.5623.77103.7361.3943.8834.5484.93DirectionN37° 58' 07"EN75° 18' 47"EN84° 17' 28"EN52° 44' 21"ES87° 02' 01"ES27° 45' 05"WS47° 26' 57"WS74° 13' 44"WN84° 52' 35"WS54° 22' 58"WN78° 04' 52"WN53° 14' 30"WLINE TABLELine #L1L2L3L4L5L6L7L8L9L10L11L12Length181.5643.225.91208.9434.9935.355.005.007.0728.2839.989.98DirectionN34° 56' 33"WS48° 19' 19"EN41° 40' 41"EN10° 18' 17"WN48° 35' 00"WS86° 35' 30"WN48° 25' 09"WN48° 20' 02"WN86° 35' 30"EN86° 35' 30"ES48° 35' 00"EN41° 34' 51"ESTATEHIGHWAYNO. 616.22 ACRESGANDY SUBDIVISIONLOT 1 & LOT 2, BLOCK 1NOTES:1. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE MONUMENTED LINE BETWEENTHE NORTH CORNER OF THE 1.036 ACRE TRACT 1A(LONGMIRE DRIVE) DESCRIBED IN VOL. 5782, PG. 277 ANDTHE EAST CORNER OF THE 1.377 ACRE TRACT 2A(LONGMIRE DRIVE) DESCRIBED IN VOL. 5628, PG. 93, BOTHOF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS.RECORD BEARING: S 32°28'34"E.2. CURRENT TITLE APPEARS VESTED IN R.B. TOLSON,MYRTLE L. TOLSON, AND M. CHARLES GANDY. SEE VOL.3115, PG. 35 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXAS, AND LAST WILL AND TESTAMENTRECORDED IN VOL. 445, PG. 71 OF THE DEED RECORDS OFBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS.3. THE SUBJECT TRACT LIES BEYOND THE "LIMIT OFDETAILED STUDY" AND THEREFORE DOES NOT LIE WITHINTHE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ACCORDING TO THE F.E.M.A.FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASAND INCORPORATED AREAS. COMMUNITY NO. 480083,PANEL NO. 0310F, MAP NO. 48041C0310F. EFFECTIVE DATE:APRIL 2, 2014.4. LOT 1 - 14.38 ACRES: PROPOSED LAND USE - CHARTER SCHOOL FACILITYLOT 2 - 1.62 ACRES: PROPOSED LAND USE - VACANT5. INDICATES R.O.W. DEDICATIONS.0.22 ACRES TOTALINDICATES EASEMENT ABANDONMENT INDICATES 20' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION.6. ZONING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: THE PROPERTY ISCURRENTLY ZONED R-RURAL AND HAS THE FOLLOWINGSETBACK REQUIREMENTS:FRONT: 50'SIDE: 20'SIDE STREET: 15'REAR: 50'7. NO CONSTRUCTION, LANDSCAPING, GRADING, ORSTRUCTURES SHALL IMPEDE, CONSTRICT, OR BLOCK THEFLOW OF WATER IN ANY PRIVATE OR PUBLIC DRAINAGEEASEMENTS, OR ANY DRAINAGE WAYS.8. LOT 1 DETENTION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH APROPOSED DETENTION POND LOCATED AT THE WESTERNPORTION OF LOT 1.9. LOT OWNERS FOR LOT 1 AND LOT 2 WILL EACH BEREQUIRED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE MAINTENANCE TO THEPORTION OF THE PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT WHICHLIES ON THEIR RESPECTIVE LOT SUCH THAT THE PATHWAYRETAINS ITS CAPACITY FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF STORMFLOWS.10. LOT 1 AND LOT 2 WILL PROVIDE ON-SITE DETENTION ASNECESSARY TO PREVENT ADVERSE IMPACTSDOWNSTREAM. THE DEVELOPMENT INTENT FOR LOT 2 ISUNKNOWN AT THIS TIME; IF DETENTION IS NECESSARY ITWILL BE PROVIDED ON LOT 2.ROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, A-54COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASSCALE: 1"=60' JULY, 2017OFSCALE: 1"=60'K:\data\BCS\Proj_2017\E0575602_CHARTER SCHOOL AT LONGMIRE - SITE DEV\cadd\Platting\E0575602_Final Plat.dwg - 7/25/2017 5:13:50 PM CURRENT ZONINGR: RURALCITY OF COLLEGE STATIONCALLED 0.260 ACRETRACT 2B-LONGMIRE DRIVEVOL. 5628, PG. 93LOT 114.38 ACRESINSET "A"SCALE: 1"=10'0SCALE IN FEETSCALE IN FEETSCALE IN FEETSCALE IN FEET0SCALE IN FEETSCALE IN FEETSCALE IN FEETSCALE IN FEET18012060CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS4101 S. TEXAS AV. STE ABRYAN, TX 77802 --- (979)846-6212TEXAS FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBERSENG. F-2214 & SURVEYING 100410-00TELEVISION CABLEATMOS PIPELINEATMOSWWATER VALVEPOWER POLELIGHT POLEFIRE HYDRANTWATER METERWATER LINEOVERHEAD ELECT. LINEETVTELEVISION PEDESTALLEGENDSSTSTSSTELEPHONE PEDESTALTELEPHONE LINESANITARY SEWER MANHOLESANITARY SEWER LINESTORM SEWER MANHOLESTORM SEWER LINEFIBER OPTIC LINESTGAS LINEGSUBJECTTRACTGRAHAM ROADLONGMIRE DRIVEROCK PRAIRIE ROADSEE INSET "A"IRON ROD FOUNDIRON ROD W/ CAP SETPAGE 1 OF 2LOT 21.62 ACRESLONGMIRE DRIVE(CURRENT R.O.W. LINE)CURRENT ZONINGR: RURALCURRENT ZONINGGS: GENERAL SUBURBANCURRENT ZONINGO:OFFICECURRENT ZONINGGS: GENERAL SUBURBANCURRENT ZONINGNAP:NATURAL AREAS PROTECTEDCURRENT ZONINGSC: SUBURBAN COMMERCIALCURRENT ZONINGR-6: HIGH DENSITY MULTI FAMILYCURRENT ZONINGR: RURALS41°40'41"W~14.27'N41°34'51"E~896.24'
K:\data\BCS\Proj_2017\E0575602_CHARTER SCHOOL AT LONGMIRE - SITE DEV\cadd\Platting\E0575602_Final Plat.dwg - 7/25/2017 5:13:50 PM
16.22 ACRESGANDY SUBDIVISIONLOT 1 & LOT 2, BLOCK 1ROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, A-54COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASSCALE: 1"=60' JULY, 2017OFCIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS4101 S. TEXAS AV. STE ABRYAN, TX 77802 --- (979)846-6212TEXAS FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBERSENG. F-2214 & SURVEYING 100410-00PAGE 2 OF 2GRAHAM ROAD5' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION - 0.05 ACRE (LOT 1)ROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, A-54COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASFIELD NOTES OF A 0.05 ACRE TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND, LYING AND BEINGSITUATED IN THE ROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 54, COLLEGESTATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF THE CALLED 25.6 ACRETRACT DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM R. B. TOLSON TO MYRTLE L. TOLSON,RECORDED IN VOLUME 3115, PAGE 35, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXAS, AND SAID 0.05 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBEDAS FOLLOWS:BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF THEBEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT WITH THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF GRAHAM ROAD,FROM WHICH A ½” IRON ROD FOUND AT A 3” CREOSOTE POST FENCE CORNER BEARSS 41° 34' 51” W - 0.72 FEET;THENCE N 41° 34' 51” E ALONG THE CURRENT SOUTHEAST LINE OF GRAHAMROAD (RIGHT-OF-WAY VARIES), FOR A DISTANCE OF 465.06 FEET TO NORTH CORNEROF PROPOSED LOT 1;THENCE S 48° 25' 09” E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF THE PROPOSED LOT 1AND LOT 2 FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET;THENCE S 41° 34' 51” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 465.06 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD ANDCAP SET IN THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF THE 25.6 ACRE TRACT;THENCE N 48° 20' 02” W ALONG THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF THEBEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT, SAME BEING THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THELEE - CALLED 10 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 148,PAGE 300, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, ADJACENT TO AFENCE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING,CONTAINING 0.05 ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.GRAHAM ROAD5' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION - 0.05 ACRE (LOT 2)ROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, A-54COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASFIELD NOTES OF A 0.05 ACRE TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND, LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THEROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 54, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, ANDBEING PART OF THE CALLED 25.6 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM R. B. TOLSON TOMYRTLE L. TOLSON, RECORDED IN VOLUME 3115, PAGE 35, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXAS, AND SAID 0.05 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGINNING AT THE ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT THE NORTHERLY WEST CORNER OF THELONGMIRE DRIVE DEDICATION - 1.036 ACRE, TRACT 1A, DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 5782, PAGE 277, OFTHE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THESOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE AND THE SOUTHEAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OFGRAHAM ROAD (THE NORTHWEST LINE OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT LIES OUT INGRAHAM ROAD);THENCE N 86° 35' 30” E ALONG THE TRANSITION LINE FROM GRAHAM ROAD TO LONGMIREDRIVE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.07 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET;THENCE S 41° 34' 51” W THROUGH THE INTERIOR OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRETRACT, AT A DISTANCE OF 411.17 FEET, PASS A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET FOR REFERENCE,CONTINUE ON, FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 436.17 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF PROPOSED LOT 2;THENCE N 48° 25' 09” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE CURRENT SOUTHEAST LINE OFGRAHAM ROAD;THENCE N 41° 34' 51” E ALONG THE CURRENT SOUTHEAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAHAMROAD, FOR A DISTANCE OF 431.18 FEET TO THE TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.05ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.LONGMIRE DRIVE10' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION - 0.04 ACRE (LOT 1)ROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, A-54COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASFIELD NOTES OF A 0.04 ACRE TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND, LYING AND BEINGSITUATED IN THE ROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 54, COLLEGESTATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF THE CALLED 25.6 ACRETRACT DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM R. B. TOLSON TO MYRTLE L. TOLSON,RECORDED IN VOLUME 3115, PAGE 35, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXAS, AND SAID 0.02 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLYDESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY AND WESTERLYSOUTHEAST LINE OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT WITH THESOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE;THENCE S 41° 40' 41” W ALONG THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF THEBEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 10.28 FEET TO A ½” IRONROD AND CAP SET AT THE EAST CORNER OF PROPOSED LOT 1;THENCE N 34° 56' 33” W PARALLEL WITH AND 10 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THECURRENT SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE, FOR A DISTANCEOF 181.56 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET IN SOUTHERLY NORTHEAST LINE OFTHE 25.6 ACRE TRACT;THENCE S 48° 19' 19” E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY NORTHEAST LINE OF THEBEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 43.22 FEET TO THECURRENT SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE;THENCE S 34° 56' 33” E ALONG THE CURRENT SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINEOF LONGMIRE DRIVE (70' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY), FOR A DISTANCE OF 137.14 FEET TOTHE TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.04 ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.LONGMIRE DRIVEVARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION - 0.03 ACRE (LOT 2)ROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, A-54COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASFIELD NOTES OF A 0.03 ACRE TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND, LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THEROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 54, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, ANDBEING PART OF THE CALLED 25.6 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM R. B. TOLSON TOMYRTLE L. TOLSON, RECORDED IN VOLUME 3115, PAGE 35, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXAS, AND SAID 0.02 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT THE ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT THE NORTHERLY WEST CORNER OF THELONGMIRE DRIVE DEDICATION - 1.036 ACRE, TRACT 1A, DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 5782, PAGE 277, OFTHE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THESOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE AND THE SOUTHEAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OFGRAHAM ROAD (THE NORTHWEST LINE OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT LIES OUT INGRAHAM ROAD);THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE (70' WIDERIGHT-OF-WAY), AS FOLLOWS:N 86° 35' 30” E ALONG THE TRANSITION LINE FROM GRAHAM ROAD TO LONGMIRE DRIVE,FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.07 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET FOR THEPLACE OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE (70' WIDERIGHT-OF-WAY), AS FOLLOWS:N 86° 35' 30" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.28 FEET TO A 12" IRON ROD AND CAP SET FOR ANGLEPOINT CORNERS 48° 35' 00” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.98 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT THEBEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUSOF 466.41 FEET,SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 163.77 FEET AND CORNER,THE CHORD BEARS S 38° 31' 27" E - 162.93 FEET;THENCE S 41° 34' 51” W THROUGH THE INTERIOR OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRETRACT, FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.32 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET IN THE SOUTHEAST LINE OFPROPOSED LOT 2 IN THE ABOVEMENTIONED CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING ARADIUS OF 461.41 FEET;THENCE PARALLEL WITH AND 5 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE CURRENT SOUTHWESTRIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE (70' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY) AND THROUGH THE INTERIOR OFTHE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT, AS FOLLOWS:NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 163.83 FEET TO A ½” IRONROD AND CAP SET AT THE END OF THIS CURVE, THE CHORD BEARS N 38° 24'40” W - 162.97 FEET,N 48° 35' 00” WFOR A DISTANCE OF 34.99 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT ANORTHEAST CORNER OF PROPOSED LOT 2;THENCE S 86° 35' 30” W ALONG THE PROPOSED TRANSITION LINE LONGMIRE DRIVE TOGRAHAM ROAD FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.35 FEET TO A 12" IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT A NORTHWESTCORNER OF PROPOSED LOT 2 IN THE PROPOSED SOUTHWEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GRAHAMROAD;THENCE N 41° 34' 51" E ALONG THE PROPOSED SOUTHEAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINED OF GRAHAMROAD FOR A DISTANCE OF 9.98 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION,CONTAINING 0.03 ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.LONGMIRE DRIVE5' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION - 0.05 ACRE (LOT 1)ROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, A-54COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASFIELD NOTES OF A 0.05 ACRE TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND, LYING AND BEINGSITUATED IN THE ROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 54, COLLEGESTATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF THE CALLED 25.6 ACRETRACT DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM R. B. TOLSON TO MYRTLE L. TOLSON,RECORDED IN VOLUME 3115, PAGE 35, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXAS, AND SAID 0.05 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLYDESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT THE ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT THE NORTHERLY WESTCORNER OF THE LONGMIRE DRIVE DEDICATION - 1.036 ACRE, TRACT 1A, DESCRIBEDIN VOLUME 5782, PAGE 277, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS,AND BEING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OFLONGMIRE DRIVE AND THE SOUTHEAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAHAM ROAD (THENORTHWEST LINE OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT LIES OUT INGRAHAM ROAD);THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE (70'WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY), AS FOLLOWS:N 86° 35' 30” E ALONG THE TRANSITION LINE FROM GRAHAM ROAD TOLONGMIRE DRIVE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.35 FEET TO A ½”IRON ROD AND CAP SET;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE (70'WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY), AS FOLLOWS:S 48° 35' 00” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.98 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAPSET AT THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THESOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 466.41 FEET,SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 163.77 FEETAND CORNER, AT THE PLACE OF BEGINNING OF THISDESCRIPTION, THE CHORD BEARS S 38° 31' 27" E - 162.93 FEET;THENCE ALONG THE CURRENT SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIREDRIVE (70' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY), AS FOLLOWS:SOUTHERLY, CONTINUING ON ALONG SAID CURVE, CONCAVE TO THESOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 466.41 FEET, FOR AN ARCLENGTH OF 147.83 FEET TO THE END OF THIS CURVE, THECHORD BEARS S 19° 23' 05” E - 147.21 FEET,S 10° 18' 17” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 208.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF ACURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF535.00 FEET,SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 52.78 FEET TO A½” IRON ROD AND CAP FOUND AT A 4” CEDAR POST MARKINGTHE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF THEBEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT, THE CHORD BEARS S13° 07' 51” E - 52.75 FEET;THENCE S 41° 40' 41” W ALONG A SOUTHEAST LINE OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED25.6 ACRE TRACT, SAME BEING THE NORTHWEST LINE OF THE CITY OF COLLEGESTATION - CALLED 0.26 ACRE - TR. 2B, DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED INVOLUME 5628, PAGE 93, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, FORA DISTANCE OF 5.91 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET IN THE SOUTHEAST LINEOF PROPOSED LOT 1 IN THE SAID CURVE;THENCE THROUGH THE INTERIOR OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRETRACT, PARALLEL WITH AND 5 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE CURRENT SOUTHWESTRIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE (70' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY), AS FOLLOWS:NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING ARADIUS OF 540.00 FEET, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 56.43 FEETTO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT THE END OF THIS CURVE,THE CHORD BEARS N 13° 17' 55” W - 56.41 FEET,N 10° 18' 17” WFOR A DISTANCE OF 208.94 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAPSET AT THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THESOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 461.41 FEET,NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 144.43 FEET TO A½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET IN THE NORTHWEST LINE OF SAIDLOT 1, THE CHORD BEARS N 19° 16' 20” W - 143.84 FEET;THENCE N 41° 34' 51” E THROUGH THE INTERIOR OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED25.6 ACRE TRACT AND ALONG THE NORTHWEST LINE OF PROPOSED LOT 1, FOR ADISTANCE OF 5.32 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.05 ACRE OFLAND, MORE OR LESS.GANDY SUBDIVISION - 16.22 ACRESROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, A-54COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASFIELD NOTES OF A 16.22 ACRE TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND, LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE ROBERT STEVENSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 54, COLLEGE STATION,BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF THE CALLED 25.6 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM R. B. TOLSON TO MYRTLE L. TOLSON, RECORDED IN VOLUME 3115,PAGE 35, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND SAID 16.22 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGINNING AT A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT THE COMMON CORNER BETWEEN THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT AND A 21.00 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED IN THEDEED TO J. K. DEVELOPMENT, LLP, RECORDED IN VOLUME 2539, PAGE 71, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND IN THE NORTHEAST LINE OF LOT 18,BLOCK 6, DOVE CROSSING SUBDIVISION, PHASE 8, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 8605, PAGE 224, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS,FROM WHICH A 6” CREOSOTE POST FENCE CORNER BEARS N 41° 31' E - 5.4 FEET;THENCE N 47° 43' 15” W ALONG THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT AND BLOCK 6, DOVE CROSSING SUBDIVISION, FOR A DISTANCE OF167.78 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP FOUND AT A 6” CREOSOTE POST FENCE CORNER MARKING THE COMMON CORNER BETWEEN THE SAID BLOCK 6, AND THE 10 ACRETRACT DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO D. RALPH LEE, RECORDED IN VOLUME 148, PAGE 300, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;THENCE N 48° 20' 02” W ALONG THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT AND THE BEFOREMENTIONED 10 ACRE TRACT, ADJACENT TO AFENCE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 810.06 FEET AND CORNER IN THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF GRAHAM ROAD, FROM WHICH A ½” IRON ROD FOUND BEARS S 41° 35' W - 0.7 FEET, AND A 3”CREOSOTE POST FENCE CORNER BEARS S 41° 29' E - 1.2 FEET;THENCE N 41° 34' 51” E ALONG THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF GRAHAM ROAD (RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH VARIES), FOR A DISTANCE OF 896.24 FEET TO A 12" IRON ROD AND CAP SETAT THE INTERSECTION WITH LONGMIRE DRIVE (70' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY);THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE (70' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY), AS FOLLOWS:N 86° 35' 30” E ALONG THE TRANSITION LINE FROM GRAHAM ROAD TO LONGMIRE DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.35 FEET TO A 12" IRON ROD AND CAP SET IN THESOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE;S 48° 35' 00" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.98 FEET TO A 12" IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF466.41 FEET;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE (70' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY), AS FOLLOWS:SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 311.60 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT THE END OF THIS CURVE, THE CHORD BEARS S 29° 26' 39” E -305.84 FEET,S 10° 18' 17” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 208.94 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD SET AT THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 535.00FEET,SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 52.78 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP FOUND AT A 4” CEDAR POST, MARKING THE NORTH CORNER OF THECITY OF COLLEGE STATION - CALLED 0.260 ACRE - TRACT 2B - LONGMIRE DRIVE, DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 5628, PAGE 93, OF THEOFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, THE CHORD BEARS S 13° 07' 51” E - 52.75 FEET;THENCE S 41° 40' 41” W ALONG THE EASTERLY SOUTHEAST LINE OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT, SAME BEING THE NORTHWEST LINE OF THEBEFOREMENTIONED 0.26 ACRE - TRACT 2B, ADJACENT TO A FENCE, AT A DISTANCE OF 5.91 FEET, PASS A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT THE SOUTH CORNER OF THE 0.05 ACRERIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION TRACT, CONTINUE ON, FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 92.17 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP FOUND AT A 2” CEDAR POST MARKING THE WESTCORNER OF THE 0.260 ACRE - TRACT 2B, SAME BEING THE INTERIOR ELL CORNER OF THE 25.6 ACRE TRACT;THENCE S 48° 19' 19” E ALONG THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 0.260 ACRE TRACT, FOR A DISTANCE OF 286.58 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET INTHE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE - 70' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAME BEING THE NORTH CORNER OF A 0.049 ACRE - TRACT 1B, DESCRIBED IN THE DEEDTO THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5782, PAGE 277, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;THENCE S 34° 56' 33” E ALONG THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LONGMIRE DRIVE, SAME BEING THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 0.049 ACRE -TRACT 1B, FOR A DISTANCE OF 137.14 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP SET AT THE SOUTH CORNER OF THE SAID 0.049 ACRE TRACT, AND IN A LOWER NORTHWEST LINE OF A1.377 ACRE - TRACT 2A - LONGMIRE DRIVE, DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5628, PAGE 93, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OFBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;THENCE S 41° 40' 41” W ALONG THE LOWER NORTHWEST LINE OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 1.377 ACRE - TRACT 2A, FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.27 FEET AND CORNER AT AWEST CORNER OF THE SAID 1.377 ACRE TRACT, FROM WHICH A ½” IRON ROD FOUND BENT BEARS N 72° 09' W - 0.6 FEET;THENCE S 48° 19' 19” E ALONG A SOUTHWEST LINE OF THE BEFOREMENTIONED 1.377 ACRE TRACT, FOR A DISTANCE OF 0.89 FEET TO A ½” IRON ROD AND CAP FOUND AT A6” CEDAR FENCE POST, AND IN THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT AND THE BEFOREMENTIONED 21.00 ACRE TRACT;THENCE S 41° 31' 21” W ALONG THE COMMON LINE BETWEEN THE BEFOREMENTIONED 25.6 ACRE TRACT AND THE BEFOREMENTIONED 21.00 ACRE TRACT, ADJACENT TO AFENCE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 520.92 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 16.22 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATIONSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF ______________I, M. CHARLES GANDY, owner and developer of the land shown on this plat, and designated herein as the Gandy Subdivision tothe City of College Station, Texas, and whose name is subscribed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of the public forever allstreets, alleys, parks, greenways, infrastructure, easements, and public places thereon shown for the purpose and considerationtherein expressed. All such dedications shall be in fee simple unless expressly provided otherwise.________________________________M. CHARLES GANDYSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF ______________Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared M. CHARLES GANDY known to me to be the personwhose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose andconsideration therein stated.Given under my hand and seal on this ________ day of ________________, 2017._______________________________Notary Public, Brazos County, TexasCERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATIONSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF ______________I, R.B. TOLSON, owner and developer of the land shown on this plat, and designated herein as the Gandy Subdivision to the Cityof College Station, Texas, and whose name is subscribed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of the public forever all streets, alleys,parks, greenways, infrastructure, easements, and public places thereon shown for the purpose and consideration thereinexpressed. All such dedications shall be in fee simple unless expressly provided otherwise.________________________________R.B. TOLSONSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF ______________Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared R.B. TOLSON known to me to be the person whose nameis subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and considerationtherein stated.Given under my hand and seal on this ________ day of ________________, 2017._______________________________Notary Public, Brazos County, TexasCERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATIONSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF ______________I, MYRTLE L. TOLSON, owner and developer of the land shown on this plat, and designated herein as the Gandy Subdivision tothe City of College Station, Texas, and whose name is subscribed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of the public forever allstreets, alleys, parks, greenways, infrastructure, easements, and public places thereon shown for the purpose and considerationtherein expressed. All such dedications shall be in fee simple unless expressly provided otherwise.________________________________MYRTLE L. TOLSONSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF ______________Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared MYRTLE L. TOLSON known to me to be the person whosename is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose andconsideration therein stated.Given under my hand and seal on this ________ day of ________________, 2017._______________________________Notary Public, Brazos County, TexasCERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR AND/OR ENGINEER S. M. Kling 2003_______________________________S. M. Kling, R.P.L.S. No. 2003CERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEERI, Alan Gibbs, City Engineer of the City of College Station, Texas, hereby certify that this Subdivision Plat conforms to the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the City ofCollege Station.________________________________City EngineerCity of College StationCERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERKSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF BRAZOSI, Karen McQueen, County Clerk, in and for said county, do hereby certify that this plat together with its certificates of authentication was filed for record in my officethe________________________________________ day of, 2017, in the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, in Volume ______ Page _________.WITNESS my hand and official Seal, at my office in Bryan, Texas.__________________________________County Clerk,Brazos County, TexasCERTIFICATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONI, Jane KEE, Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, hereby certify that the attached plat was duly approved by the Commission on the dayof ______________________, 2017._______________________________Chairman
Planning & Zoning Commission August 3, 2017
Scale One General Commercial and one Multifamily lot on approximately 17.8 acres Location The northern corner of Raymond Stotzer Parkway and Turkey Creek Road Applicant Kerry Pillow, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP Project Manager Alaina Helton, Senior Planner ahelton@cstx.gov Project Overview This preliminary plan is in preparation of creating a commercial lot at the hard corner of Raymond Stotzer and Turkey Creek with a multifamily lot behind it. FEMA-regulated flood hazard areas do not currently exist on the property. The estimated 100-year flood prone area for the Whites Creek tributary will be determined with final plat. Downstream wastewater improvements will be necessary for final plat approval. The improvements will include, but are not limited to, increasing the capacity of the Valley Park Lift Station as well as improvements to the TAMU sanitary sewer collection system. Parkland Dedication Fees in lieu of dedication will be due at time of building permit at the rate of $687/bedroom for Neighborhood and Community parks. Traffic Impact Analysis Not required. Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance
Yes
Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, with the exception of a waiver being requested to the rear public utility easement requirement. Staff Recommendation Approval of the waiver and preliminary plan.
Supporting Materials
1. Waiver request 2. Aerial 3. Application 4. Copy of Preliminary Plan
Preliminary Plan for the Turkey Creek Subdivision PP2017-000004
SUBDIVISION WAVIER REQUEST
The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations
contained in the UDO except for the following waiver request:
• UDO Section 12-8.3.l.2.1. ‘Minimum Utility Easements’– Per the requirements of this
section, each block that does not contain an alley shall provide a 20-foot utility easement
at the rear of all lots. The applicant is requesting this waiver as their preference is to
provide a temporary blanket utility easement on the entire property initially and dedicate
all necessary specific easements with site development.
In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and
Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver:
1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such
that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of
the reasonable use of his land;
The property is at the perimeter of all of College Station utility CCNs and flexibility in the
timing of specific easement dedication will help to successfully coordinate the provision of
public infrastructure.
2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant;
If the waiver is not granted, the subject tract can still be subdivided. However, the waiver
provides the applicant an opportunity to assist in the timing of the construction by removing
obstacles of additional easement abandonment and dedication processes that would
otherwise cause a delay in site development.
3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering
this chapter; and
There will be a blanket easement in place allowing for the proper installment of utilities and
all necessary infrastructure for the project. Further site specific easements will be
dedicated once the installation of the aforementioned utilities is complete. The granting of
the waiver for this development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property.
4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this
chapter.
Granting the requested waiver will not affect the ability of surrounding tracts to meet the
ordinance when platting. The requested waiver is to allow flexibility in the placement of
utilities internal to the site, and are not affecting existing or proposed utilities that would be
utilized by any surrounding tract of land that is intending to further subdivide.
View.ashx %d×%d pixels
https://collegestation.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=5336725&GUID=F8DE0263-DA1E-448B-8ADB-C9A34FF88D43[7/28/2017 3:08:31 PM]
August 3, 2017
Regular Agenda
Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Plantation Oaks Addition
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Jenifer Paz, AICP, Senior Planner
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use & Character Map from
Suburban Commercial to General Commercial for approximately 1.3 acres being situated in the
Plantation Oaks Addition, Block 1, Lot 1 located at 1500 Earl Rudder Freeway South. Case
#CPA2017-000002 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the August 24th City
Council Meeting- Subject to change.)
Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use and Character Map.
Summary: The applicant has requested an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan’s Future
Land Use and Character Map from Suburban Commercial to General Commercial in order to
request a rezoning to GC General Commercial.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Changed or changing conditions in the subject area or the City: The subject
property was rezoned to O Office in 2013, which is consistent with the Suburban
Commercial land use on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use and Character Map,
and has remained undeveloped.
The surrounding properties to the north and west are designated as General Suburban and
were developed as single-family residential through the 1970s. The properties to the south
are designated as Urban Mix Use and are in a Redevelopment Area. These land use
designation were given to the property due to the age of the existing multi-family
development and zoning districts, GC General Commercial and R-6 High Density Multi-
Family, currently on the property.
TXDOT made changes to the ramps to Earl Rudder Freeway in 2015. An exit ramp located
across the subject property was reversed, creating an on ramp that begins before the
subject lot. In 2016, the property to the south, on the corner of University Oaks Blvd. and
frontage road was developed as an office building.
2. Scope of the request: The request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use and Character Map designation for approximately 1.3 acres from Suburban Commercial
to General Commercial. If approved by City Council, the applicant intends to pursue a
rezoning of the property from O Office to GC General Commercial. A request for rezoning
was submitted for consideration and will be heard following this item.
3. Availability of adequate information: General Commercial land use designation allows
for the future development of commercial activities, including retail sale and service uses,
which serve the nearby residents and larger community or region. Properties in this area are
served by College Station Utilities (CSU). Domestic water and sanitary sewer service is
serving the site. Additional infrastructure improvements may be needed with site
improvement. The area of the subject site proposed as General Commercial was not
enough warrant a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
4. Consistency with the goals and strategies set forth in the Plan: The goal for College
Station’s Future Land Use and Character is to create a community with strong, unique
neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a protected
and enhanced natural environment. A relevant strategy identified to achieve this goal is to
establish and protect distinct boundaries between various character areas. Although the
property is near property designated as Urban Mixed Use, it also abuts properties
designated and developed for single-family use. Given the limited width of the subject lot,
approximately 140 feet at its widest point, there are concerns of the impacts General
Commercial land uses on the abutting residential properties.
The current designation of Suburban Commercial is suitable for commercial uses that serve
the nearby community and are compatible with residential uses. These areas are intended
to be smaller in size and compatible with surrounding single-family residential uses. The
subject property’s current land use designation continues to be appropriate due to the
limited width of the site and its close proximity and potential impact to the established single-
family neighborhood.
The proposed land use designation, General Commercial, is generally for concentrations of
commercial activities that cater to both nearby residents and to the larger community or
region. Generally, these areas tend to be large in size and located near the intersection of
two regionally significant roads (arterials and freeways). It is preferred that in such areas
development be concentrated in nodes rather than spread out in strips. Although the
property has direct access to a freeway, the property is small in size and opportunities for
consolidation land is not possible at this location due to the surrounding properties being
developed as single-family.
5. Consideration of the Future Land Use & Character and/or Thoroughfare Plans: The
current land use of Suburban Commercial is intended for concentrations of commercial
activities that cater primarily to nearby residents versus the larger community or region.
Generally, these areas tend to be small in size and located adjacent to major roads (arterials
and collectors). The design of Suburban Commercial structures are compatible in size, roof
type and pitch, architecture, and lot coverage with the surrounding single-family residential
uses.
The proposed land use of General Commercial is intended for concentrations of commercial
activities that cater both to nearby residents and to the larger community or region.
Generally, these areas tend to be large in size and located near the intersection of two
regionally significant roads (arterials and freeways).
Earl Rudder Freeway is designated as a Freeway/Expressway and University Oaks Blvd. is
designated as a Major Collector on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. The frontage along
University Oaks Blvd. would not allow for an driveway on this thoroughfare. Although the
property’s location and direct access to the frontage road support General Commercial land
use other variables, such as compatibility with single-family residential, do not support this
land use.
6. Compatibility with the surrounding area: The proposed amendment to General
Commercial would allow for the property to be zoned for commercial uses that serve the
general community and region. Properties to the north and west are currently zoned GS
General Suburban.
Amending the Comprehensive Plan to General Commercial in this area would not
compatible with the existing zoning and development directly adjacent to the property. The
current land use designation, Suburban Commercial, is intended for smaller scale
community or neighborhood services that is compatible in size and lot coverage with the
surrounding near medium to low density single-family residential.
7. Impacts on infrastructure including water, wastewater, drainage, and the
transportation network: Water service is currently provided by College Station Utilities.
There is an existing 12-inch waterline along Earl Rudder Freeway. Sewer service is
available via existing 8-inch sewer main across University Oaks Blvd.
Additionally, the property is in the Carter’s Creek drainage basin. The site generally drains
south. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site development shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines.
8. Impact on the City’s ability to provide, fund, and maintain services: The proposed
amendment for the subject property does not negatively impact the City’s ability to provide,
fund, and maintain services.
9. Impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas: The proposed amendment
for the subject property does not negatively impact environmentally sensitive and natural
areas or does not prevent the preservation of such areas.
10. Contribution to the overall direction and character of the community as captured
in the Plan’s vision and goals: The goal for College Station’s Future Land Use and
Character is to create a community with strong, unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas,
special districts, distinct corridors, and a protected and enhanced natural environment. The
proposed amendment from Suburban Commercial to General Commercial on approximately
1.3 acres impedes on this goal by proposing an incompatible, intense land use adjacent to
single-family residential properties. The subject lot has limited site width for it to adequately
protect the single-family homes from undesirable elements associated with intense use while
providing adequate improvements for general commercial land uses.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends denial of the Future Land Use and Character Map amendment request.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Background Information
2. Aerial and Amendment Exhibit
3. Application
4. Comprehensive Plan Map
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 3, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: August 24, 2017
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Cat Hollow HOA
Contacts in support: None
Contacts in opposition: None
Inquiry contacts: None
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive
Plan Zoning Land Use
North General Suburban GS General
Suburban Single-family
South
(across University
Oaks Blvd)
Urban Mix-Use &
Redevelopment Area
GC General
Commercial Office
East N/A N/A Earl Rudder Freeway
West General Suburban GS General
Suburban Single-family
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: August 1958
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon Annexation
O Office in February 2013
Final Plat: Property was platted as Plantation Oaks Addition Block 1, Lot 1 in
2013.
Site development: Property is currently vacant and undeveloped.
MILES CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT LPPLANTATION OAKS ADDN, BLOCK 1, LOT 11.27 ACRESZONED: OFFICEPROPOSED USE: RETAILPAULETTE MARTINEZPLANTATION OAKS, BLOCK 1,
LO
T
4
0.5037 ACRESZONED: GENERAL SUB
U
R
B
A
N
EXISTING USE: RESI
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
ROBERT & A
L
I
C
I
A
N
O
VO
A
PLANTATION O
A
K
S
,
B
LO
C
K
1
,
LO
T
3
0.4
3
3
1
A
C
R
E
S
ZONED:
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
S
U
B
U
R
B
A
N
EXIS
T
I
N
G
U
S
E
:
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
EM
E
R
SO
N
HO
L
D
I
N
G
S
L
T
D
P
L
A
N
T
A
T
IO
N
O
A
K
S
,
B
LO
C
K
1
,
LO
T
2
0
.
3
7
9
9
A
C
R
E
S
ZO
N
E
D
:
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
S
U
B
U
R
B
A
N
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
U
S
E
:
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
C
L
I
F
FO
R
D
&
HO
R
T
E
N
S
I
A
B
RO
G
DO
N
P
L
A
N
T
A
T
IO
N
O
A
K
S
,
B
LO
C
K
1
,
LO
T
1
0
.
4
2
3
1
A
C
R
E
S
ZO
N
E
D
:
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
S
U
B
U
R
B
A
N
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
U
S
E
:
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L MICHAEL S & KATHERINE K KRIGERPLANTATION OAKS, BLOCK 1, LOT 50.9293 ACRESZONED: GENERAL SUBURBANEXISTING USE: RESIDENTIAL WILLIE M MCCONNELLCARTER'S GROVE PH 1, BLOCK 10, LOT 2 (70.5'OF) & 31' OF 3 & ADJ 0.3475 AC0.6724 ACRESZONED: GENERAL SUBURBANEXISTING USE: RESIDENTIALLEAANN SCHROEDERCARTER'S GROVE PH 1, BLOCK 10, LOT 1& 17' OF 2 & ADJ. 0.13740.469 ACRESZONED: GENERAL SUBURBANEXISTING USE: RESIDENTIALBURNHAM PAL M LIVING TRUSTRICHARD CARTER(AB-8), BLOCK 3, LOT 120.939 ACRESZONED: GENERAL SUBURBANEXISTING USE: RESIDENTIALSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 6(SOUTH EARL RUDDER FREEWAY)VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.SOUTH-BOUND FRONTAGE ROAD(SOUTH EARL RUDDER FREEWAY)VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
O
A
K
S
B
L
V
D
6
0
'
R
.
O
.
W
.TARA CT50' R.O.W.12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12WSA
SA
SA
SA
SA
EXISTING 12" WATERLINEEXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINEDOMINIK DR.60' R.O.W.NEWPHASE INVENSTMENTS LLCTRIANGLE OAKS, BLOCK 1, LOT 11.316 ACRESZONED: GENERAL COMMERCIALEXISTING USE: OFFICEEARL RUDDER FWYUN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
O
A
K
S
B
L
V
D
HA
R
V
E
Y
R
O
A
D
HA
R
V
E
Y
R
O
A
D
D
O
M
I
N
I
K
D
R
I
V
E
ASSOCIATES AVEMERRY OAKS DR.TARA CTEXISTING: SUBURBAN COMMERCIALPROPOSED: GENERAL COMMERCIALEXISTING: NATURAL AREAS - RESERVEDEXISTING: GENERAL SUBURBANEXISTING: URBAN MIXED USELEGENDPRCOMPREHENSIVEPLAN AMENDMENTC2.0JNP16-0861VICINITY MAPMILES CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT1500 EARL RUDDER FWY SCOLLEGE STATION, TEXAS1.27 ACRESPLANTATION OAKS ADDN, BLOCK 1, LOT 1CURRENT ZONING:OFFICE (O)DEVELOPER:MILES CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT LPCONTACT: BO MILESP.O. BOX 10467COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842(979)-777-4675MILESCONSTRUCTION@GMAIL.COMGESSNER ENGINEERINGSuite 102Corporate Office2501 Ashford DriveCollege Station, Texas 77840www.gessnerengineering.comFIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER:TBPE F-7451, TBPLS F-10193910COLLEGE STATION979.680.8840979.836.6855817.405.0774210.556.4124BRENHAMFORT WORTHSAN ANTONIOIssue Date:Drawn By:Checked By:Project Number:Revisions:COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
SH 6 @ UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD
COLLEGE STATION, TX. 77845,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,P L A N | D E S I G N | V E R I F Y
COMPREHENSIVEPLAN AMENDMENTC1.006/27/17CAUTION: CONTACT THE TEXAS EXCAVATIONSAFETY SYSTEM (DIG-TESS) AT 1-800-344-8377TO LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. CONTACT GESSNERENGINEERING IF CONFLICTS OCCUR.N0SCALE: 1"= 60'60120180
August 3, 2017
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – Plantation Oaks Addition
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Jenifer Paz, AICP, Senior Planner
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from O Office to GC General Commercial on approximately 1.3 acres
of land being situated in the Plantation Oaks Addition, Block 1, Lot 1, recorded in Volume
11445, Page 161 of the deed records of Brazos County, Texas, more generally located at 1500
Earl Rudder Freeway South. Case #REZ2017-000002 (Note: Final action of this item will be
considered at the August 24th City Council Meeting- Subject to change.)
Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the rezoning.
Summary: This request is amending the zoning district boundaries on the property to rezone
approximately 1.3 acres from O Office to GC General Commercial. This request is in
conjunction with a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan from Suburban Commercial to
General Commercial as a future land use.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as
Suburban Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map.
The Suburban Commercial designation is intended for commercial activities that cater
primarily to nearby residents and are areas that tend to be small in size and located
adjacent to major roadways. The design of structures in this land use are intended to be
compatible in size, roof type and pitch, architecture, and lot coverage with the surrounding
single-family residential uses. As a part of the zoning request the applicant is also
requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use of the
property designation to General Commercial. Should the land use amendment be approved
the applicant’s request to rezone the property to GC General Commercial would be
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Should the request to amend the Comprehensive
Plan be denied the rezoning is no longer consistent with the future land use designation. It
should be noted, that staff is recommending denial of the Comprehensive Plan amendment
to the property. The property’s current zoning of O Office is an appropriate district to
implement both land use scenarios of Suburban Commercial and General Commercial.
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood: The property is currently zoned O Office, which
accommodates selected commercial business that provide a service rather than sell
products, either retail or wholesale. The property is currently vacant and undeveloped.
Properties to the west are zoned GS General Suburban and developed as single-family
residential. The property to the south, across University Oaks Blvd., is zoned GC General
Commercial but developed as high density multi-family. Although the proposed zoning
district, GC General Commercial, is compatible with the property across the thoroughfare
and is typically appropriate along a highway, the size and configuration of the property
makes GC General Commercial incompatible with the immediately adjacent single-family
residential zoning district. A comparison of uses allowed in GC General Commercial versus
O Office is attached to this report.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
districts that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: Although the
proposed rezoning to GC General Commercial is appropriate for this area due to its
location on Earl Rudder Freeway, Freeway/Expressway, the site is not appropriate for this
zoning district given limited site width, which places the potential impacts of incompatible
uses permitted in General Commercial in close proximity with the adjacent residential
neighborhoods.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: Due to the
subject property’s location and visibility along Earl Rudder Freeway it would traditionally be
appropriate to have more regionally serving general commercial uses but the intensity of
the commercial development should be considered given the unique limited width of the
property and proximity to single-family residential.
With the lot being adjacent to the Plantation Oaks and Carter’s Grove residential
subdivision, it would be appropriate to have uses that were more in line with Suburban
Commercial. The current zoning district, O Office, would allow for service type uses that
would serve the general community and nearby residents. The current zoning district also
provides development restrictions such as 10-foot landscaped buffer with a fence and
building height limitations to aid in protecting the existing homes that are located within the
residential neighborhoods. Additionally, O Office and GC General Commercial are subject
to the same Non-Residential Architectural (NRA) Standards which allow for architectural
design that is consistent in commercial development.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
current zoning district, O Office, on the property is currently marketable for commercial and
office uses that provide services to the general community.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water service is currently provided by
College Station Utilities. There is an existing 12-inch waterline along Earl Rudder Freeway.
Sewer service is available via existing 8-inch sewer main across University Oaks Blvd.
Additionally, the property is in the Carter’s Creek drainage basin. Site is generally
draining south. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site development
shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design
Guidelines.
The subject tract will take access from Earl Rudder Freeway, pending TxDOT approval.
Due to the size of the tract, a new Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not warranted.
Attachments:
1. Background Information
2. Comparison of Permitted Uses
3. Aerial & Small Area Map
4. Application
5. Rezoning Map
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 3, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: August 24, 2017
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Cat Hollow HOA
Property owner notices mailed: 13
Contacts in support: None
Contacts in opposition: None
Inquiry contacts: None
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive
Plan Zoning Land Use
North General Suburban GS General
Suburban Single-family
South
(across University
Oaks Blvd)
Urban Mix-Use &
Redevelopment Area
GC General
Commercial Office
East N/A N/A Earl Rudder Freeway
West General Suburban GS General
Suburban Single-family
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: August 1958
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon Annexation
O Office in February 2013
Final Plat: Property was platted as Plantation Oaks Addition Block 1, Lot 1 in
2013.
Site development: Property is currently vacant and undeveloped.
COMPARISON OF PERMITTED USES
Uses in orange indicate uses permitted in General Commercial and not Office.
“Permitted*” indicates uses subject to specific use standards.
USE TABLE Zoning Districts
Specific Uses O Office GC General Commercial
Extended Care Facility/Convalescent/Nursing
Home Permitted
Educational Facility, Indoor Instruction Permitted Permitted
Educational Facility, Outdoor Instruction Permitted
Educational Facility, Primary and Secondary Permitted Permitted
Educational Facility, Tutoring Permitted Permitted
Educational Facility, Vocational/Trade Permitted Permitted
Governmental Facilities Permitted Permitted
Health Care, Hospitals Permitted
Health Care, Medical Clinics Permitted Permitted
Parks Permitted Permitted
Places of Worship Permitted Permitted
Animal Care Facility, Indoor Permitted Permitted
Art Studio/Gallery Permitted Permitted
Car Wash Permitted*
Commercial Garden/Greenhouse/Landscape Maint. Permitted*
Commercial Amusements Permitted*
Conference/Convention Center Permitted
Country Club Permitted
Day Care, Commercial Permitted Permitted
Drive-in/thru Window Permitted
Dry Cleaners and Laundry Permitted* Permitted
Fraternal Lodge Permitted
Fuel Sales Permitted*
Funeral Homes Permitted
Golf Course or Driving Range Permitted*
Health Club/Sports Facility, Indoor Permitted
Health Club/Sports Facility, Outdoor Permitted
Hotels Permitted
Mobile Food Court Conditional Use Permit
Night Club, Bar or Tavern Conditional Use Permit
Offices Permitted Permitted
USE TABLE Zoning Districts
Specific Uses O Office GC General Commercial
Parking as a Primary Use Conditional Use Permit Permitted
Personal Service Shop Permitted Permitted
Printing/Copy Shop Permitted Permitted
Radio/TV Station/Studios Permitted Permitted
Recreational Vehicle (RV) Park Conditional Use Permit
Restaurants Permitted
Retail Sales - Single Tenant over 50,000 SF Permitted
Retail Sales and Service Permitted*
Retail Sales and Service - Alcohol Permitted*
Shooting Range, Indoor Permitted
Theater Permitted
Sexually Oriented Business Permitted* Permitted*
Storage, Self Service Permitted
Vehicular Sales, Rental, Repair and Service Permitted*
Wholesales/Services Permitted*
Micro-Industrial Permitted*
Utility Permitted* Permitted*
Wireless Telecommunication Facilities -
Intermediate Permitted* Permitted*
Wireless Telecommunication Facilities -Major Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit
Wireless Telecommunication Facilities -
Unregulated Permitted Permitted
LP
STATE HIGHWAY NO. 6(SOUTH EARL RUDDER FREEWAY)VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.MILES CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT LPPLANTATION OAKS ADDN, BLOCK 1, LOT 11.27 ACRES CURRENTLY ZONED: OFFICEPROPOSED ZONING: GENERAL COMMERCIALPAULETTE MARTINEZPLANTATION OAKS, BLOCK 1,
LO
T
4
0.5037 ACRESZONED: GENERAL SUB
U
R
B
A
N
ROBERT & A
L
I
C
I
A
N
O
VO
A
PLANTATION O
A
K
S
,
B
LO
C
K
1
,
LO
T
3
0.4
3
3
1
A
C
R
E
S
ZONED:
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
S
U
B
U
R
B
A
N
EM
E
R
SO
N
HO
L
D
I
N
G
S
L
T
D
P
L
A
N
T
A
T
IO
N
O
A
K
S
,
B
LO
C
K
1
,
LO
T
2
0
.
3
7
9
9
A
C
R
E
S
ZO
N
E
D
:
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
S
U
B
U
R
B
A
N
C
L
I
F
FO
R
D
&
HO
R
T
E
N
S
I
A
B
RO
G
DO
N
P
L
A
N
T
A
T
IO
N
O
A
K
S
,
B
LO
C
K
1
,
LO
T
1
0
.
4
2
3
1
A
C
R
E
S
ZO
N
E
D
:
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
S
U
B
U
R
B
A
NNEWPHASE INVENSTMENTS LLCTRIANGLE OAKS, BLOCK 1, LOT 11.316 ACRESZONED: GENERAL COMMERCIALMICHAEL S & KATHERINE K KRIGERPLANTATION OAKS, BLOCK 1, LOT 50.9293 ACRESZONED: GENERAL SUBURBAN WILLIE M MCCONNELLCARTER'S GROVE PH 1, BLOCK 10, LOT 2 (70.5'OF) & 31' OF 3 & ADJ 0.3475 AC0.6724 ACRESZONED: GENERAL SUBURBANLEAANN SCHROEDERCARTER'S GROVE PH 1, BLOCK 10, LOT 1& 17' OF 2 & ADJ. 0.13740.469 ACRESZONED: GENERAL SUBURBANBURNHAM PAL M LIVING TRUSTRICHARD CARTER(AB-8), BLOCK 3, LOT 120.939 ACRESZONED: GENERAL SUBURBANSOUTH-BOUND FRONTAGE ROAD(SOUTH EARL RUDDER FREEWAY)VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
O
A
K
S
B
L
V
D
6
0
'
R
.
O
.
W
.TARA CT50' R.O.W.10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT20' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTDOMINIK DR.60' R.O.W.10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTEARL RUDDER FWYUN
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
O
A
K
S
B
L
V
D
HA
R
V
E
Y
R
O
A
D
HA
R
V
E
Y
R
O
A
D
D
O
M
I
N
I
K
D
R
I
V
E
ASSOCIATES AVEMERRY OAKS DR.TARA CTGESSNER ENGINEERINGSuite 102Corporate Office2501 Ashford DriveCollege Station, Texas 77840www.gessnerengineering.comFIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER:TBPE F-7451, TBPLS F-10193910COLLEGE STATION979.680.8840979.836.6855817.405.0774210.556.4124BRENHAMFORT WORTHSAN ANTONIOIssue Date:Drawn By:Checked By:Project Number:Revisions:COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
SH 6 @ UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD
COLLEGE STATION, TX. 77845 CAUTION: CONTACT THE TEXAS EXCAVATIONSAFETY SYSTEM (DIG-TESS) AT 1-800-344-8377TO LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. CONTACT GESSNERENGINEERING IF CONFLICTS OCCUR.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,N0SCALE: 1"= 60'60120180P L A N | D E S I G N | V E R I F Y
PRZONING MAPAMENDMENTC1.0JNP06/27/1716-0861VICINITY MAPMILES CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT1500 EARL RUDDER FWY SCOLLEGE STATION, TEXAS1.27 ACRESPLANTATION OAKS ADDN, BLOCK 1, LOT 1CURRENT ZONING:OFFICE (O)DEVELOPER:MILES CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT LPCONTACT: BO MILESP.O. BOX 10467COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842(979)-777-4675MILESCONSTRUCTION@GMAIL.COM
August 3, 2017
Regular Agenda
Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Koppe Bridge
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Jenifer Paz, AICP, Senior Planner
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use & Character Map from
Suburban Commercial to General Commercial for approximately 1.7 acres located at 12055 FM
2154. Case #CPA2017-000007 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the August
24th City Council Meeting- Subject to change.)
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use and Character Map.
Summary: The applicant has requested an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan’s Future
Land Use and Character Map from Suburban Commercial to General Commercial in an effort
to reflect the current land use of the property and in response to the recent zoning
amendments on neighboring properties. The property and surrounding area are in Growth
Area V and were designated as Suburban Commercial with the adoption of the current
Comprehensive Plan.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Changed or changing conditions in the subject area or the City: In 2016, City Council
approved a rezoning on approximately 44 acres of the adjacent tract to GC General
Commercial and approximately 21 acres be rezoned to MF Multi-Family. With the
development of the adjacent property, Jones Crossing, Balcones Drive (2 lane Minor
Collector) that will be constructed and connect to FM 2154 (Wellborn Road). The subject
tract will have access to the future right-of-way from the western boundary.
The subject tract and surrounding properties were identified in the Central College Station
Neighborhood Plan adopted in 2010. The neighborhood plan states that the extension of
Balcones Drive to Wellborn Road would allow opportunities for multi-family, urban style
development. Although the request is not for a land use that would allow for multi-family, it
would allow for more intense land uses, similar to the type of development intended by the
neighborhood plan with the extension of Balcones Drive.
2. Scope of the request: The request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
and Character Map designation for approximately 1.7 acres from Suburban Commercial to
General Commercial. If approved by City Council, the applicant intends to pursue a rezoning
of the property from R Rural to GC General Commercial. A request for rezoning was
submitted for consideration and will be heard following this item.
3. Availability of adequate information: General Commercial land use designation allows for
the future development of commercial activities, including retail sale and service uses, which
serve the nearby residents and larger community or region. Properties in this area are served
by College Station Utilities (CSU). Domestic water and sanitary sewer service is serving the
site. Additional infrastructure improvements may be needed with platting or redevelopment.
The area of the subject site proposed as General Commercial was not enough warrant a
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
4. Consistency with the goals and strategies set forth in the Plan: The goal for College
Station’s Future Land Use and Character is to create a community with strong, unique
neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a protected
and enhanced natural environment. A relevant strategy identified to achieve this goal is to
develop and maintain, through regular review, a land use plan that identifies, establishes,
and enhances community character.
The City’s economic development goals are to provide a diversified economy generating
quality, stable, full-time jobs; bolstering the sales and property tax base; and contributing to
a high quality of life. A relevant strategy identified to achieve these goals is to promote and
support new investments that serve regional market opportunities. With the development of
the adjacent tract and the residential density within the vicinity, staff recognizes the value of
having General Commercial on the Future Land Use and Character Map at this location.
The Map is conceptual in nature and this amendment will allow for the subject property to be
rezoned keeping in character with adjacent property to the west.
The current designation of Suburban Commercial is suitable for commercial uses that serve
the nearby community and are compatible with residential uses. Since surrounding
properties are currently entitled for a broader range of uses than would be allowed with
Suburban Commercial, an amendment to the Future Land Use and Character Map will be
more in line with existing entitled uses and the regional opportunity provided by proximity to
Harvey Mitchell Parkway and FM 2154 (Wellborn Road).
5. Consideration of the Future Land Use & Character and/or Thoroughfare Plans: The
subject property is currently designated as Suburban Commercial on the Comprehensive
Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The proposed amendment is to General
Commercial.
The current land use of Suburban Commercial is intended for concentrations of commercial
activities that cater primarily to nearby residents versus the larger community or region.
Generally, these areas tend to be small in size and located adjacent to major roads (arterials
and collectors). The design of Suburban Commercial structures are intended to be
compatible in size, roof type and pitch, architecture, and lot coverage with the surrounding
single-family residential use.
The proposed land use of General Commercial is intended for concentrations of commercial
activities that cater both to nearby residents and to the larger community or region.
Generally, these areas tend to be large in size and located near the intersection of two
regionally significant roads (arterials and freeways).
FM 2154 (Wellborn Road) and Harvey Mitchell Parkway are designated as a Major Arterial
on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. Given its location and close proximity to this major
intersection a General Commercial land use designation would be appropriate.
6. Compatibility with the surrounding area: The proposed amendment is compatible with
the surrounding area. Properties to the west, along FM 2154 are currently zoned GC
General Commercial. To the northeast of this property are properties designated Suburban
Commercial and zoned D Duplex and PDD Planned Development consisting of residential
townhomes/condo and duplex developments. This density supports and is compatible with
the proposed zoning district.
7. Impacts on infrastructure including water, wastewater, drainage, and the
transportation network: Water service is currently provided by College Station Utilities.
There is an existing 3-inch waterline along FM 2154. Sewer service is available via
existing 18-inch sewer main to the west of the property.
Additionally, the property is in the Bee Creek drainage basin and is generally drains to the
Northeast. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site redevelopment shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines.
8. Impact on the City’s ability to provide, fund, and maintain services: The proposed
amendment for the subject property does not negatively impact the City’s ability to provide,
fund, and maintain services.
9. Impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas: The proposed amendment for
the subject property does not negatively impact environmentally sensitive and natural areas
or does not prevent the preservation of such areas.
10. Contribution to the overall direction and character of the community as captured in
the Plan’s vision and goals: The goal for College Station’s Future Land Use and Character
is to create a community with strong, unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special
districts, distinct corridors, and a protected and enhanced natural environment. The
proposed amendment from Suburban Commercial to General Commercial on approximately
1.7 acres is in line with the Comprehensive Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Future Land Use and Character Map amendment request.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Background Information
2. Aerial and Amendment Exhibit
3. Application
4. Comprehensive Plan Map
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 3, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: August 24, 2017
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
None
Contacts in support: None
Contacts in opposition: None
Inquiry contacts: None
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive
Plan Zoning Land Use
North Suburban
Commercial R Rural Single-family
South
(across FM 2154) Urban R Rural Single-family
East Suburban
Commercial R Rural Vacant
West Urban GC General
Commercial
Future site of HEB
Grocery Store
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: June 1995
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon Annexation
A-O Agricultural Open renamed to R Rural in 2014
Final Plat: Property is unplatted
Site development: Property is currently developed as Koppe Bridge Bar & Grill.
Koppe Bridge
12055 FM 2154
College Station, TX
June 2017FM 2154SALLIE LANE
MARSHALL LANEFM 2154Existing FM 2154SALLIE LANE
MARSHALL LANEFM 2154Proposed
F
M
2
1
5
4
CAIN ROADNAVARRO DRIVEO
L
D
W
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
O
A
DHOLLEMAN DR
IVE
SOUTH
HARV
E
Y
MIT
C
H
ELL
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
S
O
U
T
H
O
F
F
R
A
M
P
ALLEYWEL
LBORN
RD
ON RA
M
P
WEST RIDGE DRSAN SABA DRIVEFRONTAGE ROAD
W
E
L
S
H
A
V
EBALCONES DRIVEVAL VERDE DRSOPHIA LANEDOWLING ROADTODD TRLHAUPT ROADSAN PEDRO DRIVEROCK PRAIRIE ROADV
O
N
T
R
A
P
P
L
N
J
O
N
E
S
-
B
U
T
L
E
R
RO
A
D
THE WO
O
D
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
T
E
R
I
N
A
L
A
N
ESAN BENITO DRIVEPRONGHORN LOOPL
O
S
P
O
R
T
A
L
E
S
D
R
I
V
E DEACON DRIVEP
U
B
L
I
C
A
L
L
E
YENCINAS PLACEFRATERNITY ROWSALLIE LANEB
L
A
N
C
O
D
R
I
V
E
PI
N
T
A
I
L
L
O
O
P
SADDL
E
L
A
N
E
IVY COVECLOVIS COURTC
O
M
M
A
N
D
O
T
R
A
I
L
ON RAMP
OFF
R
A
M
P
ALLEYVicinity Map
£
0 10.5 Miles
T. 979.260.6963
F. 979.260.3564
3204 Earl Rudder FWY S
College Station, TX 77845
Plan & Design Specialists in
Civil · Engineering · Hydraulics
Hydrology · Utilities · Streets
Site Plans · Subdivisions
www.mitchellandmorgan.com
N/F
Delph Ross
CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL),
TRACT 75, 1.651 ACRES
Existing Zoning: R - Rural
N/F
Hattie Louise Allen, Et Al.
Called 2 Acre Tract
Exhibit A-1, Vol. 6155 Pg. 232
Existing Zoning: R - Rural
N/F
Richard Pena
Remainder of Called
3.853 Acre Tract
Vol. 12406 Pg. 189
Existing Zoning: R - Rural
N/F
Delph Ross
CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL),
TRACT 75, 1.651 ACRES
Existing Zoning: R - Rural
N/F
Hattie Louise Allen, Et Al.
Called 2 Acre Tract
Exhibit A-1, Vol. 6155 Pg. 232
Existing Zoning: R - Rural
N/F
Richard Pena
Remainder of Called
3.853 Acre Tract
Vol. 12406 Pg. 189
Existing Zoning: R - Rural
S 40°21'05" W 275.58' Measured
Deed Call Bearing: S 40°21'09" W, 2569/112 S 47°00'46" E 260.33' MeasuredDeed Call Bearing: S 47°05'10" E 260.42', 2569/112N 40°21'40" E 275.80' Measured
Deed Call Bearing: N 40°20'14" E, 2569/112
N 47°03'47" W 260.37' MeasuredDeed Call Bearing: N 47°03'10" W 260.36, Per R.O.W. PlansS 40°21'05" W 275.58' Measured
Deed Call Bearing: S 40°21'09" W, 2569/112 S 47°00'46" E 260.33' MeasuredDeed Call Bearing: S 47°05'10" E 260.42', 2569/112N 40°21'40" E 275.80' Measured
Deed Call Bearing: N 40°20'14" E, 2569/112
N 47°03'47" W 260.37' MeasuredDeed Call Bearing: N 47°03'10" W 260.36, Per R.O.W. Plans1892 JONES CROSSING LTD
A000701, CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL), TRACT 52
71.886 ACRES
Existing Zoning: GC - General Commercial
1892 JONES CROSSING LTD
A000701, CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL), TRACT 52
71.886 ACRES
Existing Zoning: GC - General Commercial
Property Boundary
Suburban
Commercial
General
Commercial
Urban
£
0 4020 Feet
1 inch = 40 feet
Notes:
1.This tract does not
lie within a designated
100-year floodplain according
to FEMA FIRM Map Panel
No. 48041C0305F
Dated 04/02/2014
2. This tract is located
within Growth Area V.
Comp Plan
Amendment Map
2 Lane
Minor
Collector
6 Lane
Major
Arterial
August 3, 2017
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – Koppe Bridge
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Jenifer Paz, AICP, Senior Planner Planning & Development Services
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from R Rural to GC General Commercial on approximately 1.7 acres
of land being situated in the Crawford Burnett League, Abstract No. 7, College Station, Brazos
County, Texas, said tract being the remainder of a 1.891 acre tract of land as described by a
deed to Delph Ross recorded in Volume 2569, Page 112 of the Official Public Records of
Brazos County, Texas, more generally located at 12055 FM 2154. Case #REZ2017-000015
(Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the August 24th City Council Meeting-
Subject to change.)
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning.
Summary: This request is amending the zoning district boundaries on the property to rezone
approximately 1.7 acres from R Rural to GC General Commercial. This request is in conjunction
with a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan from Suburban Commercial to General
Commercial as a future land use. The property is currently developed as Koppe Bridge Bar &
Grill.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as
Suburban Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map.
The Suburban Commercial designation is intended for commercial activities that cater
primarily to nearby residents and are areas that tend to be small in size and located
adjacent to major roadways. The design of structures in this land use are intended to be
compatible in size, roof type and pitch, architecture, and lot coverage with the surrounding
single-family residential uses. As a part of the zoning request the applicant is also
requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use of the
property designation to General Commercial. Should the land use amendment be approved
the applicant’s request to rezone the property to GC General Commercial would be
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Should the request to amend the Comprehensive
Plan be denied the rezoning request would no longer be consistent with the future land use
designation and staff would not be supporting the request to rezone. It should be noted,
that staff is recommending approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment to the
property.
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood: The property is currently zoned R Rural, which
allows for agricultural type uses and large lot single-family. The current use of the property
as Koppe Bridge Bar & Grill, built in 1992, is an existing nonconforming use to the current
zoning district due to annexation of the property that occurred in 1995.
The property to the north and east, adjacent to the subject tract, are also zoned R Rural
and are generally vacant and undeveloped with the exception of the two tracts that are
developed as single-family residential. The property to the west, across future Balcones
Drive, is zoned GC General Commercial, will allow for a broad range of commercial uses.
This property is currently planned to be a HEB grocery store.
The proposed zoning district, GC General Commercial, is compatible with the zoning
district to the west and would make the current use on the property conforming.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
districts that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed
rezoning to GC General Commercial is suitable for this area due to its location on FM 2154
(Wellborn Road), a Major Arterial. Additionally, the property will be located at a signalized
intersection when Balcones Drive is completed.
The property is currently developed as commercial. Koppe Bar & Grill has existed on the
property prior to annexation, in 1992. The proposed zoning district will make the use on the
property conforming and allow for redevelopment in the future.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
property is developed with a use that is permitted in GC General Commercial, the proposed
zoning district. By rezoning the property the owner has the opportunity to redevelop the site
in the future.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: Although
the property can be marketed if rezoned to zoning district that is consistent with the current
Suburban Commercial land use, which allows for commercial uses, the marketability of the
property will increase if rezoned to GC General Commercial. The marketability will further
increase due to its location at a future signalized intersection of FM 2154 and the future
Balcones Drive, a 2-lane minor collector that will be built with the Jones Crossing
Development.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water service is currently provided by
College Station Utilities. There is an existing 3-inch waterline along FM 2154. Sewer
service is available via existing 18-inch sewer main to the west of the property. Additionally,
the property is in the Bee Creek drainage basin. The site generally drains to the northeast.
Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site redevelopment shall be designed
and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines.
The subject tract will take access from FM 2154 (Wellborn Road), a 6-lane Major Arterial,
and will have access to Balcones Drive, 2-lane Minor Collector, when completed. Due to
the size of the tract, a new Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not warranted.
Attachments:
1. Background Information
2. Aerial & Small Area Map
3. Application
4. Rezoning Map
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 3, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: August 24, 2017
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
None
Property owner notices mailed: Five (5)
Contacts in support: None
Contacts in opposition: None
Inquiry contacts: None
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive
Plan Zoning Land Use
North Suburban
Commercial R Rural Single-family
South
(across FM 2154) Urban R Rural Single-family
East Suburban
Commercial R Rural Vacant
West Urban GC General
Commercial
Future site of HEB
Grocery Store
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: June 1995
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon Annexation
A-O Agricultural Open renamed to R Rural in 2014
Final Plat: Property is unplatted
Site development: Property is currently developed as Koppe Bridge Bar & Grill.
Koppe Bridge
May 2017
Rezoning MapFM 2154SALLIE LANE
MARSHALL LANEFM 2154Existing FM 2154SALLIE LANE
MARSHALL LANEFM 2154Proposed
F
M
2
1
5
4
CAIN ROADNAVARRO DRIVEO
L
D
W
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
O
A
DHOLLEMAN DR
IVE
SOUTH
HARV
E
Y
MIT
C
H
ELL
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
S
O
U
T
H
O
F
F
R
A
M
P
ALLEYWEL
LBORN
RD
ON RA
M
P
WEST RIDGE DRSAN SABA DRIVEFRONTAGE ROAD
W
E
L
S
H
A
V
EBALCONES DRIVEVAL VERDE DRSOPHIA LANEDOWLING ROADTODD TRLHAUPT ROADSAN PEDRO DRIVEROCK PRAIRIE ROADV
O
N
T
R
A
P
P
L
N
J
O
N
E
S
-
B
U
T
L
E
R
RO
A
D
THE WO
O
D
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
T
E
R
I
N
A
L
A
N
ESAN BENITO DRIVEPRONGHORN LOOPL
O
S
P
O
R
T
A
L
E
S
D
R
I
V
E DEACON DRIVEP
U
B
L
I
C
A
L
L
E
YENCINAS PLACEFRATERNITY ROWSALLIE LANEB
L
A
N
C
O
D
R
I
V
E
PI
N
T
A
I
L
L
O
O
P
SADDL
E
L
A
N
E
IVY COVECLOVIS COURTC
O
M
M
A
N
D
O
T
R
A
I
L
ON RAMP
OFF
R
A
M
P
ALLEYVicinity Map
£
0 10.5 Miles
T. 979.260.6963
F. 979.260.3564
3204 Earl Rudder FWY S
College Station, TX 77845
Plan & Design Specialists in
Civil · Engineering · Hydraulics
Hydrology · Utilities · Streets
Site Plans · Subdivisions
www.mitchellandmorgan.com
N/F
Delph Ross
CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL),
TRACT 75, 1.651 ACRES N/F
Hattie Louise Allen, Et Al.
Called 2 Acre Tract
Exhibit A-1, Vol. 6155 Pg. 232
N/F
Richard Pena
Remainder of Called
3.853 Acre Tract
Vol. 12406 Pg. 189
N/F
Delph Ross
CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL),
TRACT 75, 1.651 ACRES
N/F
Hattie Louise Allen, Et Al.
Called 2 Acre Tract
Exhibit A-1, Vol. 6155 Pg. 232
N/F
Richard Pena
Remainder of Called
3.853 Acre Tract
Vol. 12406 Pg. 189
S 40°21'05" W 275.58' Measured
Deed Call Bearing: S 40°21'09" W, 2569/112 S 47°00'46" E 260.33' MeasuredDeed Call Bearing: S 47°05'10" E 260.42', 2569/112N 40°21'40" E 275.80' Measured
Deed Call Bearing: N 40°20'14" E, 2569/112
N 47°03'47" W 260.37' MeasuredDeed Call Bearing: N 47°03'10" W 260.36, Per R.O.W. PlansS 40°21'05" W 275.58' Measured
Deed Call Bearing: S 40°21'09" W, 2569/112 S 47°00'46" E 260.33' MeasuredDeed Call Bearing: S 47°05'10" E 260.42', 2569/112N 40°21'40" E 275.80' Measured
Deed Call Bearing: N 40°20'14" E, 2569/112
N 47°03'47" W 260.37' MeasuredDeed Call Bearing: N 47°03'10" W 260.36, Per R.O.W. PlansUtility Easement
City of Bryan,
Vol. 292 Pg. 265
1892 JONES CROSSING LTD
A000701, CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL), TRACT 52
71.886 ACRES
1892 JONES CROSSING LTD
A000701, CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL), TRACT 52
71.886 ACRES
Utility Easement
City of Bryan,
Vol. 292 Pg. 265
Property Boundary
R - Rural
GC - General
Commercial
Easement
Boundary
£
0 4020 Feet
1 inch = 40 feet
Note: This tract does not
lie within a designated
100-year floodplain according
to FEMA FIRM Map Panel
No. 48041C0305F
Dated 04/02/2014
Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77840 Office 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM July 27, 2017 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Justin Golbabai AICP, CNU-A, Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Plan of Work Update – Off-Street Parking Requirements Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance”, Section 7.3 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas regarding off-street parking standards. Background: This amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance implements changes to the City’s off-street parking regulations as directed as part of Planning and Zoning Commission’s 2016 and 2017 Plan of Work. The purpose of these changes are to implement the following goals: Provide flexibility and parking alternatives for developing and redeveloping properties to increase their economic development viability and taxable value. Responsibly reduce regulatory barriers that contribute to underutilized parking areas while still protecting neighborhoods from overflow parking. Increase the discretion given to Administrator to consider alternative parking options. Eliminate parking requirements that add minimal value and would streamline staff processes. To accomplish these goals, this ordinance amendment proposes the following changes: Allow shopping centers to have a set minimum parking ratio that is not dependent of the parking ratios of the tenants that occupy them. Extend the City’s demand based parking option to all developments and remove the requirement that a balance of land be held in reserve in the event that more parking is needed.
Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77840 Office 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
Change the distance eligibility requirements for shared and off-site parking option from 250 feet to 500 feet. Provide a general reduction of two parking spaces for certain non-residential uses in order to assist the development potential of smaller sites. Reduce the parking requirement for 2 bedroom multi-family units from 1.5 parking spaces per bedroom to 1.0 parking spaces per bedroom. Eliminate additional layout and landscaping requirements for large parking lots over 120 spaces. Allow curbs in parking areas to be omitted if pedestrian areas are adequately protected. In addition to the items listed above, additional flexibility to the City’s parking requirements for non-conforming sites are anticipated as part of broader revisions to for UDO Section 12-9 “Nonconformities” that will occur under the 2017 Plan of Work item “Evaluation of UDO Requirements”.
Sec. 12-7.3. - Off-Street Parking Standards.
A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to establish the guidelines for off-street parking areas consistent with the proposed land use to:
1) Eliminate Reduce the occurrence of non-resident on-street parking in adjoining neighborhoods; 2) Avoid the traffic congestion and public safety hazards caused by a failure to provide such parking areas; and 3) Expedite the movement of traffic on public thoroughfares in a safe manner, thus increasing the carrying capacity of the streets and reducing the amount of land required for streets, thereby lowering the cost to both the property owner and the City.; and 3)4) Provide flexibility and parking alternatives for developing and redeveloping properties to increase their viability.
B. Off-Street Parking Spaces Required. 1) In all districts, for all uses, at the time any building or structure is erected, enlarged, or increased in capacity, or at any time any other use is established, there shall be off-street parking spaces provided for motor vehicles in accordance with the requirements specified herein, except as noted below. Exception:
a. In all single-family residential and townhouse uses, at the time of construction, redevelopment, or when an addition to the number of existing bedrooms is completed there shall be off-street parking spaces provided for motor vehicles in accordance with the requirements specified herein. 2) Where off-street parking facilities are provided in excess of the minimum amounts specified by this Section, or when off-street parking facilities are provided but not required, said off-street parking facilities shall comply with the minimum requirements for parking and maneuvering space as specified in this Section. 3) It shall be unlawful to discontinue or dispense with, or cause the discontinuance or reduction of, the required parking facilities apart from the discontinuance of the building, use, or structure without establishing alternative off-street parking facilities that meet these requirements.
C. Dimensions, Access, and Location. This Section applies to any development or redevelopment of uses other than single-family residential, duplexes, or townhouses unless otherwise noted.
1) Each off-street parking space for automobiles shall have an area of not less than nine (9) feet by twenty (20) feet and each stall shall be striped. This standard shall apply for off-street parking for all uses including single-family residential, duplexes, and townhouses. Single-family residential and townhouses are not required to stripe parking spaces.
2) For properties located within the area described as "Area V" in the Southside Area Neighborhood Plan, an amendment of the City's Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance No. 2012-3442), a new single-family structure may locate its parking, including both required and additional parking in the areas described below: a. Anywhere on the lot behind the structure with no limit on the size of the area; b. Anywhere in the side yards of the lot with no limit on the size of the area; and, c. An area located in front of the structure not to exceed a size equivalent to fifty (50) percent of the front portion of the property. The front portion of the property is the area of the lot within the side lot lines, the front setback, and the public right-of-way line (see graphic below). The square footage of parking allowed by this calculation may be located within or outside the boundary of the area used for calculations (see graphic below). The portion of the driveway located between the front property line and the structure shall be included in the maximum parking area square footage. AREA V - ALLOWABLE LOCATION FOR PARKING
3) For all detached single-family uses other than as set forth in subsection 2 above,, at the time of construction, reconstruction, or addition to the number of existing bedrooms, parking shall be located in the areas described below:
a. Anywhere on the lot behind the structure with no limit on the size of the area. Parking located behind the structure shall be screened by a solid hedge wall, fence, or wall, at least six (6) feet in height. All solid hedge walls shall be one-hundred (100) percent opaque. All shrubs planted for a hedge wall shall be a minimum of 15 gallons each and evergreen; b. Anywhere in the side yards of the lot with no limit on the size of the area; and, c. Any area located in front of the primary structure not to exceed a size equivalent to fifty (50) percent of the front area. The front area is defined as the area of the lot within the side lot lines, the front plane of the primary structure and the public right-of-way (see graphic below). The driveway area shall be included in this calculation.
DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY USES - ALLOWABLE LOCATION FOR PARKING
4) When existing detached single-family parking is expanded in front of the structure, it shall not exceed a size equivalent to fifty (50) percent of the front area as described above. 5) An eighteen-foot paved space (ninety-degree only) may be utilized where the space abuts a landscaped island with a minimum depth of four (4) feet. An eighteen-foot space may also be used when adjacent to a sidewalk provided that the minimum width of the sidewalk is six (6) feet. This standard shall also apply to off-street parking for single-family residential, duplexes, and townhouses. 6) The width of an alley may be assumed to be a portion of the maneuvering space requirement for off-street parking facilities located adjacent to a public alley. This standard shall apply for off-street parking for all uses including single-family residential, duplexes, and townhouses. 7) Each parking space intended for use by the handicapped shall be designed in accordance with the standards of the Texas Architectural Barriers Act (TABA) administered by the Texas Department of License and Regulation. 8) Each parking space and the maneuvering area thereto shall be located entirely within the boundaries of the building plot except where shared parking is approved by the City. 9) All parking spaces, aisles, and modules shall meet the minimum requirements, as shown in the following table. All dimensions are measured from wall to wall.
PARKING SPACE AND AISLE DIMENSIONS
A B C D E F
Angle (degrees) Width of stall
Depth of stall 90° to aisle
Width of aisle Width of stall parallel to aisle
Module width
One way Two way One way Two way
0 22 feet 10 feet 12.0 feet 20.0 feet 22.0 feet 22.0 feet 40.0 feet 45 9 feet 21.1 feet 12.0 feet 20.0 feet 12.7 feet 54.2 feet 62.2 feet 60 9 feet 22.3 feet 15.0 feet 22.0 feet 10.4 feet 59.6 feet 66.3 feet 90 9 feet 20.0 feet 23.0 feet 23.0 feet 9.0 feet 63.0 feet 63.0 feet
10) Parking lots located within fifteen (15) feet of a public right-of-way shall have a maximum of seven (7) contiguous spaces separated by an eighteen- by twenty-foot landscaped island. 11) All parking lots and drive aisles shall be setback a minimum of six (6) feet from any public right-of-way or public way. In sites subject to the Non-Residential Architectural Standards of this UDO, where parking or drive aisles are located between the building and the public right-of-way or public way, there shall be a minimum setback of ten (10) feet from the public right-of-way or public way to the parking area or drive aisle. 12) In SC Suburban Commercial and WC Wellborn Commercial districts, parking shall not be located between the structure and an adjacent single-family use or zoning district. Drive aisles and service aisles shall be permitted between the structures and an adjacent single-family use or zoning district. 13) Parking is discouraged along entrance drives and should be limited on major circulation aisles of large developments and major retail centers. 14) The Design Review Board may waive parking lot dimension requirements in the Northgate and Wolf Pen Creek districts if the development meets the goals of the master plan for the respective district. D. Landscape Islands. 1. End Islands. a. A raised island, encompassing not less than one hundred eighty (180) square feet in area, shall be located at both ends of every interior and peripheral parking row, regardless of
the length of the row. End islands may have sidewalks through them. Examples of interior and peripheral parking are shown in the figure below.
b. All end islands must be raised at least six (6) inches and curbed, with the majority of the area of each island planted or treated with enhanced paving. The soil within the planted area shall not be compacted or stabilized and shall be contiguous with the soil at the natural grade.
2. Interior Islands. a. All interior islands shall be evenly distributed throughout the interior of the parking area. b. For every fifteen (15) interior parking spaces, one hundred eighty (180) square feet of landscaping must be provided somewhere in the interior rows of the parking lot. Interior island areas may be grouped and configured as desired provided that circulation aisles remain clear and the minimum island area is not less than one hundred eighty (180) square feet. Interior islands may have sidewalks through them. c. End island areas that exceed the minimum required may be counted toward the interior parking island requirement. d. All interior islands must be raised at least six (6) inches and curbed, with the majority of the area of each island planted or treated with enhanced paving. The soil within the planted area shall not be compacted or stabilized and shall be contiguous with the soil at the natural grade. 3. Large Parking Lots. This subsection shall apply only to sites subject to the Non-Residential Architectural Standards of this UDO except for MU Mixed-Use districts:
a. In order to break up the parking lot area and minimize visual impact, one (1) of the following parking concepts is required on any parking lot with greater than one hundred twenty (120) parking spaces. Parking concepts shall be approved by the Administrator provided that it meets one (1) of the following minimum criteria. Pedestrian walkways are allowed within the below-described areas.
1. Concept 1. Every one hundred twenty (120) parking spaces shall be a separate and distinct parking area connected by driving lanes but separated by landscaping strips a minimum of eight (8) feet wide and the full length of the parking row. Where pedestrian facilities are located within landscape strips or where vehicles would overhang these strips, the strip shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide;
2. Concept 2. For every one hundred twenty (120) parking spaces, a one thousand eight hundred (1,800) square foot landscaped island shall be installed (Landscape Pods). Such island(s) shall be located internal to the parking lot and shall be located so as to visually break up each one hundred twenty (120) parking spaces. The landscaping square footage calculation for parking lots greater than one hundred twenty (120) parking spaces shall be pro-rated at fifteen (15) square feet of landscaping per parking space; or,
3. Concept 3. For every one hundred twenty (120) parking spaces, an additional one thousand eight hundred (1,800) square feet of landscaped area shall be added/distributed to the interior row(s) end island(s) located closest to the right-of-way line (i.e. in conjunction with the minimum setback creating a double row of landscaping) but in no event shall the additional landscaped area be located farther than one hundred (100) feet from the right-of-way frontage. The landscaping square footage calculation for parking lots greater than one hundred twenty (120) parking spaces shall be pro-rated at fifteen (15) square feet of landscaping per parking space.
b. Interior island area requirements may be consolidated into end islands, landscape strips, and landscape pods. c. Shopping cart storage spaces shall be identified on the site plan. These spaces shall not be located in landscape islands or any areas designed for plantings or pedestrian or bike access. d. All landscaping strips, islands, pods, and areas used to segregate the one hundred twenty (120) space parking areas as provided for above under "Parking Lots" must include canopy trees or structural shading. This requirement shall not apply to auto sales lots.
E. Requirements Apply to All Parking Areas. Every parcel of land hereafter used as a public parking area, including commercial parking lots, visitor parking areas for single-family and townhouse uses, and parcels used for open-air sales lots, shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the requirements in this Section and as described in the City of College Station Site Design Standards. The requirements in this Section do not apply to overflow parking for churches, nor to temporary overflow parking for City events and temporary parking for special events.
F. Surfacing. 1. General. All surfacing of off-street parking areas shall be constructed of either asphalt or concrete as described in the City of College Station Site Design Standards. Alternatives to the standards may be approved by the Administrator if it is demonstrated that the materials and design are equal or
superior to the requirements in the Standards. All off-street parking areas shall be graded to drain and be maintained so as to dispose of surface water accumulated within the area. Parking spaces shall be so arranged and marked so as to provide for orderly and safe parking of vehicles.
2. Non-Public, All-Weather Drive Surfaces. Temporary or permanent drive surfaces that are required for emergency access or turnaround for emergency vehicles must be constructed to function under all weather conditions. To accommodate a project during construction, phasing, or permanent installation, drive surfaces that do not meet the requirements for permanent pavement surfaces may be allowed at the discretion of the Administrator for the specific conditions stated below:
a. Temporary All-Weather Surface (During Construction). A structure under construction must be accessible by an all-weather drive surface as specified in the City of College Station Site Design Standards. This temporary all-weather surface must be reworked or replaced to meet the permanent pavement standard as described in the City of College Station Site Design Standards prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy;
b. Semi-Permanent All-Weather Surface (During Phasing). In cases during phasing of a large project, emergency access and turnarounds often must be added as a temporary measure until additional phases are constructed. These emergency access areas may consist of permanent pavement surfaces as specified in the City of College Station Site Design Standards. When the additional phase is constructed, these areas must be removed or reworked to meet the permanent pavement standards as described in the City of College Station Site Design Standards;
c. Permanent Surfaces. 1) All-Weather Surface (Permanent). In some development scenarios, an emergency access or turnaround must be constructed to meet emergency access purposes and is not required for public traffic, service vehicles or sanitation vehicles. In these cases, the area required for emergency access only may consist meetofthe permanent pavement standards surface as specified in the City of College Station Site Design Standards.
2) Permeable Surface. a. The use of porous materials (such as permeable concrete and pavers) to mitigate storm water sheeting and pooling of water may be used in off-street parking areas if the material meets vehicular loading standards and is approved by the Administrator. b. Fire lanes may also be constructed of porous materials such as permeable concrete and pavers to mitigate storm water sheeting and pooling of water, so long as it is demonstrated that the permeable surface can obtain sufficient land and compaction ratings for its application as approved by the City of College Station Fire and Sanitation Departments. c. Single-family and townhouse visitor parking areas, as required in Single-Family Residential Parking Requirements for Platting, may also be constructed of porous materials such as permeable concrete and pavers to mitigate storm water sheeting and pooling of water. d. Permeable surfaces approved as provided above shall be maintained in accordance with industry standards and to achieve mitigation of storm water sheeting and pooling of water. Failure to maintain permeable surfaces as required herein, shall
constitute a violation of the this Section of the UDO for which penalty provisions may be involved. G. Curbing Required. 1. General. The perimeter of all paved surfaces shall be curbed as described in the City of College Station Site Design Standards. Unless otherwise required pursuant of this Section, curbs may be omitted where drive aisles or parking spaces are located adjacent to a building if bollards or other protective devices are installed to protect pedestrian areas. Alternatives to the standards may be approved by the Administrator if it is demonstrated that the materials and design are equal or superior to the requirements in the Standards.
2. Temporary Curbing. A temporary curb may be permitted in lieu of the minimum standard stated in the City of College Station Site Design Standards, at the discretion of the Administrator, when a project is phased in such a way that a permanent, monolithic curb may preclude development of future phases or limit access to a recorded private or public access easement adjoining properties. Wheel stops shall not be permitted as a temporary curbing. Temporary curbing must have the appearance of permanent curbing and shall be temporarily attached to the pavement surfacing below and meet the minimum standards for dowelled-in curbs as described in the City of College Station Site Design Standards.
H. Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Required. In computing the number of parking spaces required, the following rules shall govern:
1. Parking requirements based on square footage shall be based upon the gross floor area, unless otherwise stated. Service areas such as mechanical rooms, restrooms, and closets shall be included in the calculation of "gross floor area" for determining required parking spaces; 2. Where fractional spaces result in computing required parking spaces, the required number of spaces must be increased to the nearest whole number. At least one (1) parking space must be provided unless otherwise specified in this UDO; 3. The parking space requirements for a use not specifically listed shall be the same as those for the most similar to the proposed use, as determined by the Administrator; 4. Whenever a building or use constructed or established after the effective date of this UDO is changed or enlarged in floor area, number of employees, number of dwelling units, seating capacity, or otherwise, parking requirements shall be met on the basis of the enlargement or change. Whenever a building or use existing prior to the effective date of this UDO is enlarged, the enlarged building or increased use shall then and thereafter comply with the parking requirements set forth herein; 5. Where requirements are established on the basis of the number of seats, such requirements shall be based on the seating capacity as determined by the Building Official; 6. Where a manufacturing/industrial use has more than one (1) working shift of employees, parking shall be provided to accommodate overlap requirements during transition periods; and 7. When the developer of a large-scale development can demonstrate that such development will require fewer parking spaces than required by the standards of this Section, the Administrator may permit a reduction in the number of required parking spaces for the development. Such a reduction in parking spaces shall be justified through the development of a
parking study prepared by a professional engineer or transportation planner and submitted to the Administrator. The balance of the land necessary to meet these requirements shall be held in reserve as an undeveloped area, to meet any future needs generated by an expansion of the business, a change in land use, or underestimated parking demand; 8.7. The Design Review Board may waive parking space requirements in the Northgate and Wolf Pen Creek districts if the development meets the goals of the master plan for the respective district.
MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Use Unit Spaces/ Unit Plus Spaces For:
Airport As determined by the Administrator Banks 250 s.f. Floor area over 500 square feet: 1.0 Bowling Alley As Determined by the Administrator Bus Depot As Determined by the Administrator Car Wash (Self-Serve) Wash Bay 1.0 1.0 space per vacuum bay Church Seat 0.33* Convalescent Home/Hospital Bed 0.5 Duplex Dwelling: 1 & 2 Bedroom DU 2.0 3+ Bedroom BR 1.0 Dormitory Bed 0.75 Day Care Center 250 s.f. Floor area over 500 s.f.: 1.0 Fraternal Lodge 75 s.f. Floor area over 150 s.f.: 1.0 Fraternity/Sorority House Person 1.0 1/30 s.f. meeting room Freight Station As Determined by the Administrator Funeral Parlor Seat 0.33 Furniture Sales, Freestanding 350 s.f. Floor area over 700 s.f.: 1.0 Golf Driving Range Tee Station 1.0 Health Club/Sports Facility As Determined by the Administrator Gasoline and Fuel Service 300 s.f. 1.0
Group Housing BR 2.0 As Determined by the Administrator Health Studio 150 s.f. Floor area over 300 s.f.: 1.0 Hospital As Determined by the Administrator Hotel/Motel DU 1.0 1/200 s.f. meeting room HUD-Code Manu. Home DU 2.0 Laundry 150 s.f. Floor area over 300 s.f.: 1.0
Use Unit Spaces/ Unit Plus Spaces For:
Motor Vehicle Sales/Service: Office/Sales Area 250 s.f. 1.0 Service Area 200 s.f. 1.0 Medical or Dental Clinic < 20,000 s.f. 200 s.f. Floor area over 500 s.f: 1.0 Mixed-Use Structure**** 250 s.f. of non-residential portion of structure Floor area over 500 s.f.: 1.0 1/BR, including residential DU and hotel/motel DU Multi-Family Dwelling: 1 Bedroom BR 1.5 2+ Bedroom BR 1.5 1.0 2 Bedroom (ea. BR < 130 s.f.) BR 1.25 3 + Bedroom BR 1.0 Night Club 50 s.f. 1.0 Office Building 250 s.f. Floor area over 500 s.f.: 1.0 Personal Service Shop 250 s.f. Floor area over 500 s.f.: 1.0 Priv. School or Comm. Studio 100 s.f. Floor area over 200 s.f.: 1.0 Retail Sales & Service: GC, SC, WC, C-3 250 s.f. Floor area over 500 s.f.: 1.0 CI 350 s.f. Floor area over 700 s.f.: 1.0 Restaurant (w/o drive-through) 65 s.f. Floor area over 130 s.f.: 1.0 Restaurant (w/drive-through) 100 s.f. Floor area over 200 s.f.: 1.0 Rooming/Boarding House Person 1.0 Sales Display 250 s.f. Floor area over 500 s.f.: 1.0 Single-Family Dwelling BR*** 1.0*** (minimum of 2 with no more than 4 total spaces required per dwelling)
Single-Unit Dwelling BR 1.0 Shopping Center**: GC, SC, WC, C-3 250 s.f. 1.0 CI 350 s.f. 1.0
Townhouse BR*** 1.0*** (minimum of 2 with no more than 4 total spaces required per dwelling)
Theater Seat 0.25 Truck Terminal As Determined by the Administrator
Use Unit Spaces/ Unit Plus Spaces For:
Two-Dwelling Unit BR 1.0 Veterinary Clinic 300 s.f. Floor area over 600 s.f.: 1.0 Warehouse 1,000 s.f. 1.0
"s.f." = square footage. "DU" = Dwelling Unit. "BR" = Bedroom.
* Overflow parking above required parking spaces may be grassed rather than paved. All unpaved spaces shall be shown on site plan and organized for efficient traffic circulation using wheel stops and other appropriate measures as required by the Administrator.
** The minimum number of parking spaces for a shopping center shall be calculated at a rate of No more than twenty-five (25) percent of any shopping center square footage shall be utilized for intense uses (uses that, individually, have a parking requirement greater than 1:250 in GC SC, or WC, and 1:350 in CI regardless of the composing uses unless otherwise determined by the Administrator that such composing uses require a modification to the applicable requirements. unless additional parking is provided in accordance with the above requirements for that square footage of such uses in excess of twenty-five (25) percent. Mixed-Use structures located in MU and MF districts are exempt from this requirement.
*** All single-family and townhouse uses, at the time of construction, redevelopment, or when an addition to the number of existing bedrooms is completed, shall come into compliance with the minimum off-street parking requirements. Garages that meet minimum dimensional standards may be counted towards parking requirements.
**** Mixed-Use structures in the MU Mixed-Use and MF Multi-Family districts.
I. Drive-Through Facility Queuing Requirements. 1. Minimum Number of Spaces. Drive-through queuing spaces shall be provided as indicated in the following table:
Minimum Off-Street Queuing Requirements Activity Type Minimum Spaces Measure From
Automated Teller Machine 3 Teller Bank Teller Lane 4 Teller or Window Car Wash Stall, Automatic 4 Service Position Car Wash Stall, Self-Service 3 Service Position Dry cleaning or Laundry 2 Window
Minimum Off-Street Queuing Requirements Activity Type Minimum Spaces Measure From
Oil-Change Station 3 Service Position Photo Lab 4 Pick-Up Window Restaurant Drive-Through 4 Order Box Restaurant Drive-Through 3 Order Box to Pick-Up Window Other As determined by the Administrator
2. Design and Layout. Queuing spaces or queuing areas shall be designed in accordance with the following criteria. :
a. Queue spaces or queuing areas may not interfere with parking spaces, parking aisles, loading areas, internal circulation or driveway access. ; b. Each queue space shall consist of a rectangular area not less than ten (10) feet wide and eighteen and one-half (18.5) feet long with a vertical clearance as specified in the building code;. c. Queue spaces are not interchangeable with parking spaces except for the following uses where the space providing services may count toward the parking requirement: bank teller, car wash, and oil-change station;. d. A twelve-foot by-pass lane may be required adjacent to queue lines to allow vehicles an opportunity to circumvent the drive-through activity and exit the site;. e. Queue areas and drive-through facilities shall be clearly identified with the appropriate signing and marking; and. f. Spaces within a car-wash facility or drive-through oil-change station may be counted toward the queuing requirement. J. Alternative Parking Plans. 1. Scope. An “Alternative Parking Plan” represents a proposal to meet vehicle parking and transportation access needs by means other than providing parking spaces on-site in accordance with the ratios established in Section 12-7.3.I, Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Required.
2. Applicability.
Applicants who wish to provide fewer or more off-street parking spaces than allowed above shall be required to secure approval of an Alternative Parking Plan, in accordance with the standards of this Section. The Administrator may require that an Alternative Parking Plan be submitted in cases where the Administrator deems the listed standard to be inappropriate based on the unique nature of the use or in cases where the applicable standard is unclear.’
3. Contents. Alternative Parking Plans shall be submitted in a form established by the Administrator and made available to the public. At a minimum, such plans shall detail the type of alternative proposed and the rationale for such a proposal.
4. Review and Approval Procedure. The Administrator shall be authorized to approve Alternative Parking Plans. Appeals of the Administrator's decision may be made to the Planning and Zoning Commission. 5. Recording. An attested copy of an approved Alternative Parking Plan shall be submitted to the County Clerk's office for recordation on forms made available in the Department of Development Services. Proof of recordation of the agreement shall be presented to the Administrator prior to issuance of a Building Permit. An approved Alternative Parking Plan may be amended by the Administrator. 6. Eligible Alternatives. A number of specific parking and access alternatives are described below. The Administrator shall, however, be authorized to consider and approve any alternative to providing off-street parking spaces on the site of the subject development if the applicant demonstrates that the proposed plan shall result in a better situation with respect to surrounding neighborhoods, City-wide traffic circulation, and urban design than would strict compliance with otherwise applicable off-street parking standards.
a. a. Demand-Based Parking. When the developer of a non-residential or multi-family development can demonstrate that such development will require fewer parking spaces than required by the standards of this Section, the Administrator may permit a reduction in the number of required parking spaces for the development. Such a reduction in parking spaces shall be justified by the applicant through the development of a parking study prepared by a professional engineer or transportation planner and submitted to the Administrator. Duplex, townhomes and single family developments are not eligible for the demand-based parking option. a.b. Shared Parking. The Administrator may authorize a reduction in the number of required off-street parking spaces for multiple-use developments or for uses that are located near one another and that have different peak parking demands or different operating hours. Shared parking shall be subject to the following standards:
1. Location. Shared off-street parking spaces shall be located no farther than two hundred fifty five hundred (250500) feet from the building site. The Administrator may waive this distance limitation, if adequate assurances are offered regarding the usability of the shared lot and the principle use (such as the operation of a van or shuttle service, etc.). that van or shuttle service shall be operated between the shared lot and the principal use; 2. Zoning Classification. Shared-parking areas shall be considered accessory uses of principal uses that the parking spaces are intended to serve. Shared parking areas shall require the same
or a more intensive zoning classification than that required for the most intensive of the uses served by the shared parking area; 3. Required Study and Analysis. The applicant shall submit a shared parking analysis to the Administrator that clearly demonstrates the feasibility of shared parking. The study shall be provided in a form established by the Administrator and made available to the public. It shall address, at a minimum, the size and type of the proposed development, the composition of tenants, the anticipated rate of parking turnover, and the anticipated peak parking and traffic loads for all uses that shall be sharing off-street parking spaces. The Administrator shall have the authority to require a revised study and analysis should conditions change that may result in a change in site parking conditions; 4. Shared Parking Agreement. A shared parking plan shall be enforced through written agreement among the owners of record. An attested copy of the agreement shall be submitted to the County Clerk's office for recordation on forms made available in the Department of Development Services. Proof of recordation of the agreement shall be presented to the Administrator prior to issuance of a Building Permit. A If a shared parking agreement may be is revoked by the parties to the agreement only if, either off-street parking ismust be provided pursuant to this Section, or if an Alternative Parking Plan ismust be approved by the Administrator; and
5. Revocation. Failure to comply with the shared parking provisions of this Section shall constitute a violation of this UDO and shall specifically be cause for revocation of a Certificate of Occupancy or Building Permit.
b. Off-Site Parking. The Administrator may permit all or a portion of the required off-street parking spaces to be located on a remote and separate lot from the lot on which the principal use is located, subject to the standards of this Section.
1. Location. No off-site parking space shall be located more than two hundred fifty five hundred (250500) feet from the building site. The Administrator may waive this distance limitation if adequate assurances are offered regarding the usability of the off-site lot and the principle use (such as the operation of a van or shuttle service, etc.). that van or shuttle service shall be operated between the shared lot and the principal use; 2. Zoning Classification. Off-site parking areas shall be considered accessory uses of principal uses that the parking spaces are intended to serve. Off-site parking areas shall require the same or a more intensive zoning classification than that required for the use served; 3. Off-Site Parking Agreement. In the event that an off-site parking area is not under the same ownership as the principal use served, a written agreement among the owners of record shall be required. An attested copy of the agreement between the owners of record shall be submitted to the County Clerk's Office for recordation on forms made available in the office of the Administrator. Proof of recordation of the agreement shall be presented to the Administrator prior to issuance of a Building Permit. If Aan off-site parking agreement may be is revoked by the parties to the agreement, either only if
off-street parking is must be provided on-site pursuant to this Section 12-7.3, Off-Street Parking Standards or if an Alternative Access and Parking Plan is must be approved by the Administrator. c. Bicycle Parking. The Administrator may authorize a reduction in the number of required off-street parking spaces for developments or uses that make special provisions to accommodate bicyclists. Examples of accommodations include bicycle lockers, employee shower facilities, and dressing areas for employees.
(Ord. No. 2012-3449 , Pt. 1(Exh. I), 9-27-2012; Ord. No. 2012-3450 , Pt. 1(Exh. E), 9-27-2012; Ord. No. 2012-3458 , Pt. 1(Exh. B), 11-8-2012; Ord. No. 2013-3522 , Pt. 1(Exh. C), 9-12-2013; Ord. No. 2014-3624 , Pt. 1(Exh. J), 12-18-2014; Ord. No. 2015-3663 , Pt. 1(Exh. E, F), 5-28-2015; Ord. No. 2016-3741 , Pt. 1(Exh. A), 1-28-2016; Ord. No. 2016-3792 , Pt. 1(Exh. E), 7-28-2016)