HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/20/2017 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionPlanning and Zoning Commission Workshop
College Station, TX
Meeting Agenda - Final
City Hall
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, TX 77840
The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning
Commission Workshop Meeting.
City Hall Council Chambers6:00 PMThursday, July 20, 2017
1. Call the meeting to order.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff.
*Final Plat ~ Amending Plat ~ The Science Park Subdivision Block
1, Lots 1A-3A ~ Case #FPCO2017-000007 (Paz)
17-03114.
Sponsors:Paz
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the
consideration of the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached)
17-03565.
Sponsors:Bombek
2017 Plan of WorkAttachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update
on the implementation of the organizational review report prepared
by Alan Mueller, consultant.
17-03416.
Sponsors:Simms
P&Z MemoAttachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z
Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
*Thursday, July 27, 2017 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council
Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison -
Osborne)
*Thursday, August 3, 2017 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~
Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m.
17-03757.
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update
on the following items:
*A Rezoning for approximately three acres located at 5101 & 5102
Pebble Creek Parkway from Rural to General Suburban &
Restricted Suburban. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard
this item on June 15, 2017, a vote to recommend approval to
17-03768.
Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 7/14/2017
July 20, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Workshop
Meeting Agenda - Final
Restricted Suburban passed (6-0), and a vote to recommend
approval to General Suburban failed (3-3). The City Council heard
this item on July 13, 2017, and a vote to approve Restricted
Suburban zoning passed (6-1) with a condition of a 25-foot buffer
against Champion's Boulevard, and a vote to approve General
Suburban zoning passed (5-2) with the condition of 25-foot buffer
against Champion's Boulevard.
*A Rezoning for approximately two acres located at 2849 Barron
Road from Planned Development District to Planned Development
District. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on
June 15, 2017, and a vote to recommend approval failed (1-5). The
City Council heard this item on July 13, 2017, and a vote to
approve the request failed (0-7).
*A Rezoning for approximately 18 acres located on Turkey Creek
Road from General Commercial & Multi -Family to General
Commercial and Multi-Family. The Planning & Zoning Commission
heard this item on June 15, 2017, and voted (6-0) to recommend
approval. The City Council heard this item on July 13, 2017, and
voted (7-0) to approve the request.
9. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design
Review Board, BioCorridor Board.
10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement
of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting.
11. Adjourn.
The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on
this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion .
An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion.
APPROVED
_____________________
City Manager
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101
Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on July 14, 2017 at 5:00 p.m.
_____________________
City Secretary
Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 7/14/2017
July 20, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Workshop
Meeting Agenda - Final
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this
meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as
interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary ’s Office at
(979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989 , or email adaassistance@cstx .gov at least
two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made .
If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting,
the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried
Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an
Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con
Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de
mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H,
Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben
entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 7/14/2017
Page 1 of 5
2017 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work
Comprehensive Plan Items
Implementation of Adopted Plans
Summary:
Implementation of adopted master plans
and neighborhood, district, and corridor
plans, namely: Central College Station,
Eastgate, Southside Area, Wellborn
Community, and South Knoll Area
neighborhood plans, and Bicycle,
Pedestrian & Greenways, Parks and
Recreation, Water, Waste Water, Medical
District, and Economic Development master
plans.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion:
Thoroughfare Plan Update
Summary: Project Dates:
The Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) is in the process of updating its
Concept Map for the BCS region. Once
adopted by the MPO, the city is anticipating
taking action to amend the Thoroughfare
Plan to align with the changes in the MPO’s
regional Concept Map.
06/15/17: Provide an update on the BCS
Thoroughfare Concept Map as adopted by
the MPO and provide information on the
City’s next steps to amend the current
Thoroughfare Master Plan. Presentation at
P&Z Workshop. (JS)
Staff Assigned: Jason Schubert Initiated: June 15, 2017
Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan Update
Summary:
Bring additional updates to the Planning and
Zoning Commission as the Master Plan update
moves forward.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Venessa Garza, P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion:
Page 2 of 5
Neighborhood Integrity Items
*Traffic Calming Toolkit
Summary:
Receive information regarding the current
traffic calming policy and devices (speed
pillows, etc.), and including updates as
recommended by the Council
Transportation and Mobility
Committee. Additionally receive update on
the implementation of the neighborhood
parking toolbox created by the
Neighborhood Transportation Task Force.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Troy Rother & Jason
Schubert
Anticipated Completion: January 2017
Student Housing in Established Single-Family Neighborhoods
Summary:
Research best practices from peer university
communities regarding the management of
student housing in single-family neighborhoods.
Explore the possibility of expanding options for
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO),
mitigate the impacts to on-street parking and
drainage and provide educational opportunities for
Homeowner’s Associations and Neighborhood
Associations
Project Dates:
4/20/17: Follow up discussion regarding the
presentation on student housing in established
single-family neighborhoods.
Staff Assigned: Mark Bombek, Rachel Lazo &
Jade Broadnax
Anticipated Completion: October 2017
Page 3 of 5
UDO Regulatory Items
Evaluation of UDO Regulations
Summary: Project Dates:
Review UDO requirements that add
minimal value as identified by staff and
consider opportunities to reduce
regulations and streamline processes.
06/01/17 Presentation of staff's initial list of
identified opportunities to reduce regulations and
streamline processes.
7/6/2017: Presentation of Draft UDO
Amendments to eliminate certain screening
requirements and eliminate the visual treatment
for exposed concrete.
Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Initiation: June 1, 2017
Sign Ordinance Revisions
Summary:
Review and update the City’s sign
ordinance in light of the recent Supreme
Court decision regarding sign regulations
based upon content.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned:
Molly Hitchcock, Rachel Lazo & Legal
Anticipated Completion: December 2017
Update on Off-Street Parking Requirements
Summary:
Provide options to allow flexibility to off -
street parking requirements. Receive
direction on future UDO text amendments.
Project Dates:
5/4/17: Additional presentation and
discussion on potential amendments or
additions to the City’s current off-street
parking requirements.
Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Completion:
Suburban Commercial Land Use and Zoning
Summary:
Under City Council direction, review current
Comprehensive Plan land use description and
zoning ordinance requirements of the Suburban
Commercial zoning district and provide options for
future text amendments.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Madison Thomas, Jenifer Paz,
Alaina Helton
Anticipated Completion: September 2017
Bicycle Rack Standards
Summary:
Under City Council direction, review current non-
residential parking requirements for providing on-
site bicycle parking facilities.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Alaina Helton & Madison Thomas Anticipated Completion: August 3, 2017
Page 4 of 5
Non-Residential Landscaping Requirements
Summary:
Review current city landscaping requirements
(including streetscaping and buffer standards) and
the water usage needed to maintain current
landscaping requirements. Explore options for
water-conserving landscaping.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Rachel Lazo, Madison Thomas,
Mark Bombek
Anticipated Completion: December 2017
On-Going Items
Economic Development Updates
Summary:
Receive regular updates from the Economic
Development Department regarding the
vision and implementation of the
commercialization of TAMU research-
related output, including examples of
successful efforts elsewhere. Additionally,
receive an update on the recent
announcement regarding plans for the
TAMU System Rellis Campus revitalization
effort.
Project Dates:
06/15/17: Provide a quarterly update on
Economic Development efforts and land
availability for commercial uses.
Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (NR)
Staff Assigned: Economic Development Anticipated Completion: On-Going
Semi-Annual Review of Pre-Application Conference Surveys
Summary:
Provide an update on the survey results from the
Pre-Application Conference process.
Project Dates:
3/16/17: Provide an update on the status of the
PAC meeting process and implementation of the
PAC survey. Presentation at P&Z Workshop.
(MB)
Staff Assigned: Mark Bombek Anticipated Completion: On-Going
Page 5 of 5
Educational/informational Items
Parkland Dedication
Summary:
Review of parkland dedication requirements and
available resources.
Project Dates:
7/6/17: Staff presented information
regarding parkland dedication requirements
and summary or parks and greenways
master plan.
Staff Assigned: Jenifer Paz Completed: July 6, 2017
Sidewalk Fee-in-Lieu
Summary:
Review of sidewalk fund requirements and
available resources.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Lauren Hovde & Mark Bombek Anticipated Completion: September 2017
Block Length and Block Perimeter
Summary:
Review of current requirements regarding block
length and block perimeter.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai & Jason
Schubert
Anticipated Completion: September 2017
Public Hearing Notifications
Summary:
Review current community notification
requirements and practices for cases involving a
public hearing.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Lance Simms Anticipated Completion: October 2017
Mueller Report Update
Summary:
Update on the implementation of the 2013
Organizational Review of P&DS (AKA “Mueller
Report”)
Project Dates:
07/20/17: Provide an update on the
implementation of the Mueller Report.
Staff Assigned: Lance Simms Anticipated Completion: July 20, 2017
Review of Development Fees
Summary:
Evaluation of the effect of development fees on
the price of single family housing to the
homeowner and an overview of the financial
context of development fees for the City.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai & Alaina Helton Anticipated Completion: November 2017
1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Lance Simms, Director of Planning & Development Services
DATE: 20 July 2017
SUBJECT: Update on Implementation of the Mueller Report
Item
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the implementation of the
organizational review report prepared by Alan Mueller, consultant.
Background
This workshop presentation is in response to an item identified on the Commission’s 2017 Plan
of Work. In 2013, the City Manager’s office retained Marsh Darcy Partners to perform an
organizational review of the Planning and Development Services Department. The purpose of the
review was to identify and assess the validity of internal and external perceptions related to the
performance of the department. The review centered on three primary functions:
Evaluate departmental policies, procedures, and attitudes as they pertain to customer
interactions and service delivery quality.
Evaluate the perceptions of the City Council, Planning Commission, and departmental
customers (external stakeholders) regarding the performance of the department.
Identify opportunities for improvement based on aligning the performance of the
department with the needs and perceptions of the external stakeholders.
The report contained a number of recommendations intended to move the City’s development
review process toward desired outcomes and rectify the mismatch in perceptions and attitudes
identified in the report. At the P&Z Workshop meeting, Staff will provide an update on
implementation efforts to date.
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
College Station, TX
Meeting Agenda - Final
City Hall
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, TX 77840
The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning
Commission Regular Meeting.
City Hall Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, July 20, 2017
1. Call meeting to order.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Hear Citizens.
At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the
Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen
presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who
wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the
agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into
the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is
made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.)
All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans
and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision
regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff
recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any
Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to
the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
4. Consent Agenda
Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence
Requests from meetings.
*Casey Oldham ~ July 20, 2017
17-03474.1
Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting
minutes.
*July 6, 2017 ~ Workshop
*July 6, 2017 ~ Regular
17-03484.2
July 6 2017 Workshop
July 6 2017 Regular
Attachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat
for Castlegate II Subdivision Section 210 consisting of 71
single-family lots and four common areas on approximately 25
17-03434.3
Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 7/13/2017
July 20, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
acres, generally located southwest of Castlegate II Subdivision
Section 205. Case #FP2016-000029
Sponsors:Thomas
Staff Report
Application
Final Plat
Attachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat
for The Crossing at Lick Creek Phase 2 consisting of 43 residential
lots and 2 common area lots on approximately 22 acres located at
13500 Rock Prairie Road, generally located south of the William D
Fitch Parkway and West of Williams Creek Subdivision. Case
#FP2016-000018
17-03554.4
Sponsors:Bombek
Staff Report
Application
Final Plat
Attachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat
for Rio Grande Subdivision consisting of 67 residential lots and 2
common area lots on approximately 7.24 acres located at 2021
Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, generally located northeast of the
intersection of Harvey Mitchell Parkway South with Rio Grande
Blvd, and west of Southwood Drive. Case # FP2015-000004
17-03584.5
Sponsors:Bombek
Staff Report
Applicaiton
Final Plat
Attachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat
for Harvey Road Subdivision Phase 1 consisting of 1 lot and
common area on approximately 17 acres located at 3210 Harvey
Road generally located west of the intersection of State Highway
30 and Linda Lane. Case # FP2017-000009
17-03544.6
Sponsors:Bombek
Staff Report
Application
Final Plat
Attachments:
Regular Agenda
Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 7/13/2017
July 20, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified
Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by
changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned
Development District to PDD Planned Development District for
approximately 8 acres in the Chimney Hill Retail Plaza Lots 1-4,
Block 1, generally located at 701 & 715 University Drive East. Case
#REZ2017-000013 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for
the August 10, 2017 City Council meeting- subject to change)
17-03626.
Sponsors:Bombek
Staff Report
Background Information
Aerial and Small Area Map
Application
Concept Plan
bulk variance list
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified
Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to GC
General Commercial on approximately 35.91 acres of land being
situated in the J.W. Scott Survey, Abstract No. 49 in College
Station, Brazos County, Texas, located at 4000 and 4002
University Drive East, and more generally located south of the
intersection of University Drive East and FM158 at the College
Station city limit line. Case #REZ2017-000016 (Note: Final action
on this item is scheduled for the July 27, 2017 City Council meeting
- subject to change)
17-03607.
Sponsors:Prochazka
Staff Report
Background
Location Map, Aerial, Small Area Map
Zoning Map
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified
17-03618.
Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 7/13/2017
July 20, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from GS General Suburban
to GC General Commercial for approximately one acre of land
being College Hills Estates Block 18, Lots 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11, more
generally located at 108, 110, 200 & 206 George Bush Drive East.
Case #REZ2017-000017 (Note: Final action on this item is
scheduled for the July 27, 2017 City Council meeting - subject to
change)
Sponsors:Prochazka
Staff Report
Background
Aerial and Small Area Map
Zoning Map
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified
Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from CI Commercial
Industrial to GC General Commercial on approximately 8.158 acres
of land located at 1501 Earl Rudder Freeway South, and more
generally located on the east side of Earl Rudder Freeway, north of
Harvey Road. Case #REZ2017-000018 (Note: Final action on this
item is scheduled for the July 27, 2017 City Council meeting -
subject to change)
17-03689.
Sponsors:Prochazka
Staff Report
Background
Aerial and Small Area Map
Zoning Map
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan -
Future Land Use & Character Map from General Suburban and
Business Park to General Commercial for approximately 100 acres
located along the east side of State Highway 6, south of The
Business Park at College Station and north of the Texas World
Speedway property. Case #CPA2017-000008 and Case
#CPA2017-000009 (Note: Final action of this item will be
considered at the July 27, 2017 City Council Meeting- subject to
change.)
17-037010.
Page 4 College Station, TX Printed on 7/13/2017
July 20, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
Sponsors:Prochazka
Staff Report
Background
Aerial
Land Use Comparison
Attachments:
11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement
of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting.
12. Adjourn
The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on
this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion.
APPROVED
_____________________
City Manager
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101
Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on July 14, 2017 at 5:00 p.m.
_____________________
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this
meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as
interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at
(979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least
two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made.
If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting,
the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried
Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an
Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Page 5 College Station, TX Printed on 7/13/2017
July 20, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con
Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de
mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H,
Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben
entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 6 College Station, TX Printed on 7/13/2017
July 6, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Workshop Meeting
July 6, 2017 6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Casey Oldham, Johnny Burns, Elianor Vessali, Bill Mather,
and Jeremy Osborne
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Keith Williamson
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerome Rektorik
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Carol Cotter, Mark Bombek,
Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton, Rachel Lazo, Kevin Ferrer, Erika Bridges, Anthony Armstrong, Kelly Kelbly,
Mary Ann Powell, Chandler Az and Kristen Hejny
1. Call the meeting to order.
Chairperson Kee Called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
There was general discussion regarding Regular Agenda Item #6.
3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the consideration of the 2017 P&Z Plan of work.
Senior Planner Bombek presented updates on the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work to the Commission.
There was general discussion.
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a review of parkland dedication requirements
and available resources.
Senior Planner Paz presented this item to the Commission.
There was general discussion.
Commissioner Mather asked if the City utilizes any financial model outside intrinsic value on an
economic basis and if parks pay for themselves.
Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation Kelbly stated that currently, maintenance comes from the
general fund.
July 6, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
Commissioner Mather asked if the Parks & Recreation Department measures the parkland benefits to
the community.
Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation Kelbly stated that they are currently working on a way to
measure benefits.
Commissioner Kee asked if the Parks & Recreation Department separates land dedication from
development fees, so that it is spent correctly.
Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation Kelbly stated that the funds are kept separate.
Commissioner Kee asked if the Parks & Recreation Department is working with the City’s Legal
Department to revamp the ability for developers to request parkland dedication fees back after a certain
amount of time.
Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation Kelbly stated that they are currently working on new language
for the process.
Commissioner Mather asked if parkland dedication funds are accounted for separately.
Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation Kelbly stated that the funds are accounted for separately, within
the general fund.
Commissioner Oldham asked if the developer dedicates, are they required to also develop a park.
Senior Planner stated Paz in some cases where land is dedicated, they are also requesting to develop a
park.
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
*Thursday, July 13, 2017 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and
Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison – Mather)
*Thursday, July 20, 2017 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00
p.m.
There was no discussion.
7. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Bio
Corridor Board.
There was no discussion.
8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire
about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the
recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the
subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There were no items.
9. Adjourn.
July 6, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
The meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
______________________________ ________________________________
Jane Kee, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin. Support Specialist
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
July 6, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
July 6, 2017, 7:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Casey Oldham, Johnny Burns, Elianor Vessali, Bill Mather,
and Jeremy Osborne
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Keith Williamson
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerome Rektorik
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Carol Cotter, Mark Bombek,
Jenifer Paz, Alaina Helton, Rachel Lazo, Kevin Ferrer, Erika Bridges, Anthony Armstrong, Mary Ann
Powell, Chandler Az and Kristen Hejny
1. Call Meeting to Order
Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 7:29 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Hear Citizens
Fred Dupriest, 400 Fairview Avenue, College Station, spoke with concerns regarding the rule of
decision for the rezoning of a property on Gilchrist. Mr. Dupriest suggested that Staff use a “Rule
of Decision” that existing zoning has a superior claim in the established neighborhood and the
rezoning must benefit the neighborhood.
4. Consent Agenda
Commissioner Mather abstained from voting on Consent Agenda Item #4.1.
4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes.
*June 15, 2017 Workshop
*June 15, 2017 Regular
4.2 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Gandy Subdivision
consisting of 2 lots on approximately 16.22 acres located at 1700 Graham Road, generally located
at the southwest corner of Longmire Drive and Graham Road. Case #PP2017-000007
4.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for the Jones Crossing
Development Phase A consisting of three commercial lots, one residential lot, and one common
area on approximately 62.9 acres located at 1720 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, generally
located at the hard southeast corner of Wellborn Road and Harvey Mitchell Parkway South. Case
#FPMU2017-000001
July 6, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4
Commissioner Osborne motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1 - 4.3. Commissioner
Oldham seconded the motion, motion to approve items 4.2 – 4.3 passed (6-0), and the motion
to approve item 4.1 passed (5-1) with Commissioner Mather abstaining.
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by
Commission Action.
No items were removed.
6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the
Comprehensive Plan – Future Land Use & Character Map from Urban and Natural Areas Reserved
to General Commercial and Natural Areas Reserved for approximately 12.5 acres located at 2338
Harvey Mitchell Parkway South. Case #CPA2017-000006 (Note: Final action on this item is
scheduled for the July 27, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change)
Senior Planner Bombek presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Commission and
recommended approval.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
No one spoke.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Burns motioned to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment as presented. Commissioner Mather seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from
GS General Suburban, P-MUD Planned Mix-Use District with OV Corridor Suburban and O Office
to GC General Commercial with OV Corridor Overlay, MF Multi-Family and NAP Natural Areas
Protected on approximately 27.868 acres of land, generally located at 2338 Harvey Mitchell
Parkway South. Case #REZ2017-000009 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the July
27, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change)
Senior Planner Bombek presented the Rezoning to the Commission and recommended approval.
There was general discussion.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
John Jordan, 2339 Harvey Mitchell Parkway, College Station, requested clarification on the
rezoning for the property.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
July 6, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4
Commissioner Osborne motioned to recommend approval the Rezoning. Commissioner Burns
seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the
Comprehensive Plan – Future Land Use & Character Map from Suburban Commercial to General
Commercial approximately 3.34 acres located at 2381 Earl Rudder Freeway South, generally located
north of Raintree Drive along Earl Rudder Freeway South. Case #CPA2017-000005 (Note: Final
action on this item is scheduled for the July 27, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change)
Senior Planner Bombek presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Commission and
recommended approval.
Applicant, Crissy Hartl, 3204 Earl Rudder Freeway South, College Station was available to present
to the Commission.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
Charles Hamilton, 7714 Appomattox Drive, College Station, Texas, spoke with concerns of
surrounding development, and access to adjacent properties and future developments.
Ron Ross, 7717 Appomattox Drive, College Station, Texas, spoke with concerns for the use of the
property, and neighborhood integrity.
Bill Lero, 4421 Nottingham, Bryan, Texas, spoke on citizen concerns for the rezoning, including
flooding, drainage, and neighborhood integrity.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
There was general discussion.
Commissioner Oldham motioned to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment as presented. Commissioner Osborne seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from
SC Suburban Commercial to GC General Commercial on approximately 3.34 acres of land being
situated in the McGill Subdivision, Lot 1, Block 1, generally located north of Raintree Drive along
Earl Rudder Freeway South. Case #REZ2017-000007 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled
for the July 27, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change)
Senior Planner Bombek presented the Rezoning to the Commission and recommended approval.
Bill Lero, 4421 Nottingham, Bryan, Texas, was available to speak on the rezoning.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
No one spoke.
July 6, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Oldham motioned to recommend approval the Rezoning. Commissioner Burns
seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
10. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to Chapter 12,
Unified Development Ordinance, Section 7.6.B, Section 7.6.D.4, Section 7.9.B of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas regarding landscaping for single-family
developments, screening of retaining walls, and visual treatment of drainage features such as
concrete weirs, outlets, and spillways. Case #ORDA2017-000003 (Note: Final action on this item is
scheduled for the July 27, 2017 City Council meeting – subject to change)
Director of Planning & Development Services Simms presented the Ordinance Amendment to the
Commission, and recommended approval.
Commissioner Vessali asked if in the proposed changes in the Unified Development Ordinance
(UDO), is this the only place where dumpsters are mentioned.
Director Simms stated that screening of dumpster areas are covered elsewhere in UDO, and the
amendment does not keep those from being screened.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
No one spoke.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Mather motioned to recommend approval the Ordinance Amendment.
Commissioner Burns seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire
about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or
the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to
place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Commissioner Mather requested an update on Southside Neighborhood unique issues.
12. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 8:22 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
______________________________ ________________________________
Jane Kee, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3
July 20, 2017
FINAL PLAT
for
Castlegate II Subdivision Section 210
FP2016-000029
SCALE: 71 single-family lots and four common areas on approximately
25.489 acres
LOCATION: Generally located southwest of Castlegate II Subdivision Section
205 and northwest of Sweetwater Forest Subdivision
ZONING: RS Restricted Suburban
APPLICANT: Wallace Phillips IV
PROJECT MANAGER: Madison Thomas, AICP
Staff Planner
mthomas@cstx.gov
PROJECT OVERVIEW: The last of the three phases in Castlegate II Subdivision.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 3
July 20, 2017
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3
July 20, 2017
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1995
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation
A-O Agricultural Open to A-OR Rural Residential (2000);
A-OR Rural Residential renamed E Estate (2013);
E Estate rezoned RS Restricted Suburban (2015)
Preliminary Plan: Initially approved in 2010 with revised versions approved by the
Planning Commission in 2012, 2015 and most recently on April
21, 2016.
Site Development: The site area is undeveloped.
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: Previous parkland for neighborhood parks has been dedicated,
and has covered all lots in Castlegate II Section 210. Past park
improvements have covered all Neighborhood Park Development
fees. A fee in lieu of Community Parkland dedication and
development of $625 per lot for 71 lots will be required, totaling
$44,375.
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks will be installed along Victoria Avenue and along both
sides of all internal residential streets.
Bicycle Connectivity: Bike lanes will be provided along Victoria Avenue.
Impact Fees: The tract is subject to the city wide impact fees: Water, Sanitary
Sewer, and Street. Impact Fees will be dependent upon timing of
building permit’s application date.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with the
approved Preliminary Plan and the Subdivision Requirements contained in the Unified
Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference N.44
NAME OF PROJECT Castlegate II Subdivision -Section 210
ADDRESS Wctoria Avenue
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
Southwest of Castlegate II Subdivision,Section 208
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
CASE NO.:
Name Wallace Phillips
Street Address 4490 Castlegate Drive
City College Station
Phone Number 979.690.7250
E-mail wsphiiips3~gmaiI.corn
State T)(Zip Code 77845
Fax Number 979.690.1041
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home of TexizsAd’M Universiiy
DATE SUBMITTED:_______________
TIME:
STAFF:
MiNIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
Is this plat Commercial ~or Residential ~
(Check one)~Minor E Amending ~Final E Vacating E Replat
($700)($700)($932)($932)($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ?~Yes ~No
~$700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
~$233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
~j $600 (minimum)Development Permit Application /Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee.Fee is
1%of acceptable Engineer’s Estimate for public infrastructure,$600 minimum (if fee is>$600,the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
~Copy of plat.(A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
~Grading,drainage,and erosion control plan with supporting drainage report.
~Public infrastructure plan and supporting documents (if applicable).
~Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
~Title report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90)days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens,
encumbrances,etc.
~The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE:A paid tax certificates from City of College Station,Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.will be due at
the time of the mylar submittal prior to filing the plat.
Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION (All owners must be identified.Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Greens Prairie Investors, LTD E-mail wsphillips3@gmail.com
Street Address 4490 Castlegate Drive
City College Station State ~‘Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979.690.7250 Fax Number 979.690.1041
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER’S INFORMATION:
Name Schultz Engineering,LLC -Joe Schultz E-mail i0e@schultzengineeringllc.corn
Street Address 911 Southwest Pkwy E.
City College Station State ~Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979.764.3900 Fax Number 979.764.3910
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property?~J Yes ~No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property?If so,please provide the Volume 10392 and Page No.276
Total Acreage 25.489 Total No.of Lots 71 R-O-W Acreage 3.893
Existing Use Agricultural -Vacant Proposed Use Single Family Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District 71 I RS I I
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
19.809~RS ____/________ ____
Floodplain Acreage N/A
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels)on the property?fl Yes ~No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance.Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
~Yes
flNo
If yes,provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:Castlegate II Preliminary Plat
City Project Number (if known):PP2016-000003
Date I Timeframe when submitted:2015
Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
one
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
None
Regarding the waiver request,explain how:
1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1.fl An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2.fl The presence of unique or unusual topographic,vegetative,or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City’s comprehensive Plan;
3.jEI A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk.Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12)months;
4.~Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate I
rural context;
5.~When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle,Pedestrian,and
Greenways Master Plan;
4.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Revised 5115 Page 3 of 9
6.E~The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or
7.~j The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway /Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification,in the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NOTE:A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participation___________________________________________________________________________
Total Linear Footage of Parkiand Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:3027_Streets
_______No.of acres to be dedicated +$__________development fee
‘-‘~“Sidewalks
No.of acres in floodplain871__Sanitary Sewer Lines
No.of acres in detention3293_Water Lines
No.of acres in greenways
-Channels
OR2173_Storm Sewers
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
-Bike Lanes I Paths
No.of SF Dwelling Units X $______=$__________________
(date)Approved by Parks &Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE:DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true,correct,and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more
than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
7/21/2016
Signature and title Date
Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 9
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1.No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2.The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3.If revoked,all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4.Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5.The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6.Other permits may be required to fulfill local,state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOl and SWPPP.
7.If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre
pour)and post construction.
8.Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9.If,stormwater mitigation is required,including detention ponds proposed as part of this project,it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10.In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station,measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction,erosion,and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities.All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project.All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11.The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications,and Standard Details.All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12.Release of plans to __________________________________(name or firm)is authorized for bidding purposes
only.I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13.I,THE OWNER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
7/21/2016
Property Owner(s)Date
Engineer Certification:
1.The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation,including detention ponds,proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2.I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local,State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOl and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES:i.e.,projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3.The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines.All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations.
I,THE ENGINEER,AGREE TO ~T ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE,AND
TE.
Date
Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 9
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats,Construction Plans,Fill I Grading Permits,and Clearing Only
Permits:*
A.I,______________________________________certify,as demonstrated in the attached drainage study,that the
alterations or development covered by this permit,shall not:
(I)increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii)create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii)decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second.This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv)reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances,Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area;nor
(v)increase Base Flood velocities.
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engineer Date
Initial
*If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted,provide written justification under separate
______letter in lieu of certification.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats,Construction Plans, and Fill I Grading Permits:
B.I,______________________________________,certify to the following:
(i)that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm.
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C.I,__________________________________,certify that the construction,improvement,or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation.I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
Revised 5115 Page 6 of 9
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D.I,_______________________________________,certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor including all utilities,ductwork and any basement,at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour)and post construction.
Engineer!Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E.I,_______________________________________,certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor,including all
utilities,ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer /Surveyor Date
OR
certify that the structure with its attendant utility,ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities,ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation,and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre
pour)and post construction.
Engineer!Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval:________________________________________________________________
Revised 5/15 Page 7 of 9
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
~Drawn on 24”x 36”sheet to scale of 100’per inch.
~Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits.No scale required but include north arrow.
~Title Block with the following information:
~Name and address of subdivider,recorded owner,planner,engineer and surveyor.
~Proposed name of subdivision.(Subdivision name &street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911.)
~Date of preparation.
~Engineer’s scale in feet.
~Total area intended to be developed.
~j North Arrow.
~Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.
El If more than I sheet,an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
~All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
~Ownership and Dedication
~Surveyor and/or Engineer
~City Engineer (and City Planner,if a minor plat)
~Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
~Brazos County Clerk
El Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only)
El If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements,submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created.
El If using private septic systems,add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner’s
Court of Brazos County,pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code.
El Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway,if applicable,according to the most recent available
data.
Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol)and clearly tied to basic survey data.
Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2).
The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii,area,center
angle,degree of curvature,tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following:(Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary with the subdivision,as well as,those within the subdivision).
Existing Proposed
1~1 Streets.Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
~1 Public and private R.O.W.locations and widths.(All existing and proposed R.O.W.’s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance.
Revised 5/15 Page 8 of 9
Existing Proposed
D Alleys.
1~1 Easements.
~A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially).
D Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages.All proposed dedications must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration.
~Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24”x 36”sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following:
~Street,alley and sidewalk plans,profiles and sections.One sheet must show the overall
street,alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision.(may be combined with other
utilities).
Sewer Design Report.
Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades.One sheet must show the
overall sewer layout of the subdivision.(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility
master plan and any future growth areas.)
Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report.
Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves,etc.with plan and profile lines showing
depth and.grades.One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision.
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas.)
Storm drainage system plan with contours,street profile, inlets,storm sewer and
drainage channels,with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff
based on 5,10,25,50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design,
channel lining design &detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage
layout of the subdivision.
~Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
~Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee /surety in accordance with UDO
Section 8.6.
~Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a
volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed.
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled
for P&Z Commission consideration.
E~1 Are there impact fees associated with this development?~Yes El No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
~Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way?El Yes ~No
If yes,TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
NOTE:1.We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing
the plat at the Courthouse.
2.If the construction area is greater than 5 acres,EPA Notice of Intent (NOI)must be submitted prior to
issuance of a development permit.
Revised 5/15 Page 9 of 9
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5 5
6
6
6
7
7
7
8
8
8
9
9
9
10
10
10
11
1111
12
12
12
13
13
13
14
14
14
15
15
15
16
16
16
17
17
17
18
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
30
31
32
33
COMMONAREA 5COMMON AREA 6COMMON AREA 7
& PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
1.348 ACRES
Wallaceshir
e
C
o
u
rtScatterby CoveCainhorn CourtOdell LaneWallaceshire Court
Wallaceshire
Court Stronghold Cove28
Victoria AvenueVictoria Avenue8 9 8 8
10
9
9
98 989
Odell LaneBLOCK 32
BLOCK 31
BLOCK 34
BLOCK 33 BLOCK 30
BLOCK 29
COMMON AREA 2Victoria AvenueGreens Prairie Road W.
BLOCK
29
COMMON AREA 4
& PRIVATE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
0.412 ACRES
BLOCK 48
BLOCK 48
BLOCK 48
BLOCK 48
BLOCK 48
BLOCK 49
BLOCK 50BLOCK 50
BLOCK 49 BLOCK 49
PUBLIC ACCESS
EASEMENT & COMMON
AREA 10
F
O
R
E
S
T
R
I
D
G
E
D
R
I
V
E
TBPE NO. 12327
2730 LONGMIRE, SUITE A
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:
FINAL PLAT
CASTLEGATE II SUBDIVISION
SECTION 210
25.489 ACRES
ROBERT STEVENSON LEAGUE, A-54
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS
71 LOTS
BLOCK 48, LOTS 1-33
BLOCK 49, LOTS 1-20
BLOCK 50, LOTS 1-18
COMMON AREAS 5, 6, 7, & 10
SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
SCALE 1'' = 60'
JUNE 2017
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
GREENS PRAIRIE
INVESTORS, LTD.
By Greens Prairie Associates, LLC
4490 Castlegate Drive
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 690-7250
LEGEND
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE ROBERT STEVENSON
LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 54, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 62.97 ACRE TRACT AS
DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO GREENS PRAIRIE INVESTORS, LTD. RECORDED IN VOLUME 12773, PAGE 290 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS
COUNTY, TEXAS.
SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF VICTORIA AVENUE (77' R.O.W.) MARKING THE WEST CORNER OF BLOCK 33,
CASTLEGATE II SUBDIVISION, SECTION 203, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11898, PAGE 32 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND THE NORTH CORNER OF SAID REMAINDER OF 62.97 ACRE TRACT;
THENCE: S 48° 03' 24" E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 62.97 ACRE TRACT AND SAID SECTION 203, CASTLEGATE II
SUBDIVISION, SECTION 205, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12241, PAGE 68 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS
COUNTY, TEXAS, AND CASTLEGATE II SUBDIVISION, SECTION 206, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12928, PAGE 38 OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1394.33 FEET TO THE NORTH CORNER OF COMMON AREA 4, CASTLEGATE II
SUBDIVISION, SECTION 206, ACCORDING TO THE REPLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 13131, PAGE 71 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS
COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE: S 13° 02' 31" W ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 62.97 ACRE TRACT AND SAID COMMON AREA 4 FOR A DISTANCE OF
296.67 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SWEETWATER FOREST, PHASE 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 4267, PAGE 254 OF THE
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE: ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 62.97 ACRE TRACT AND SWEETWATER FOREST, PHASE 1 FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS:
N 81° 31' 25" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 73.15 FEET;
N 14° 23' 23" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 95.80 FEET;
S 51° 30' 19" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 137.63 FEET;
S 23° 33' 08" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.67 FEET;
N 76° 30' 58" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 82.11 FEET;
S 18° 30' 02" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.86 FEET;
N 71° 55' 53" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 120.56 FEET;
N 40° 56' 24" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.53 FEET;
N 31° 52' 55" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.22 FEET;
N 70° 11' 07" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.11 FEET;
S 12° 20' 47" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 83.11 FEET;
N 80° 15' 06" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 42.77 FEET;
N 27° 06' 14" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.52 FEET;
N 36° 02' 48" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 78.69 FEET;
N 73° 49' 56" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 104.37 FEET;
S 80° 01' 10" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 167.78 FEET;
N 32° 25' 11" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.04 FEET;
N 64° 43' 03" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 67.46 FEET;
S 11° 54' 33" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 64.33 FEET;
S 89° 27' 57" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.74 FEET;
N 22° 49' 44" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 122.72 FEET;
S 57° 18' 15" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 57.18 FEET;
N 63° 25' 01" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 64.89 FEET;
N 11° 49' 23" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.11 FEET;
N 77° 25' 22" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 62.42 FEET;
S 12° 29' 02" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.77 FEET;
S 88° 44' 14" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.32 FEET;
N 02° 25' 01" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 58.17 FEET;
S 49° 16' 09" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 85.37 FEET;
N 56° 16' 57" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 109.18 FEET;
N 66° 50' 42" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.65 FEET;
S 41° 56' 16" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 152.02 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST LINE OF GREENS PRAIRIE ROAD WEST (VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.) FOR THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIS HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT;
THENCE: N 48° 34' 12" W ALONG THE NORTHEAST LINE OF GREENS PRAIRIE ROAD WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 302.01 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN
SAID LINE;
THENCE: N 54° 33' 41" W CONTINUING ALONG THE NORTHEAST LINE OF GREENS PRAIRIE ROAD WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 117.51 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET;
THENCE:ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 96° 29' 34" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 42.10 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 06° 18' 54" W -
37.30 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE ON THE EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF VICTORIA AVENUE (77' R.O.W.);
THENCE: ALONG THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF VICTORIA AVENUE AND THE EXTENSION THEREOF FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS:
N 41° 55' 53" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 82.07 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 611.50 FEET;
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09° 30' 09" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 101.42 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 46° 40' 58" E - 101.30
FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE AND THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET;
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 83° 14' 58" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 36.32 FEET (CHORD BEARS: S 86° 56' 28" E - 33.21 FEET)
TO THE END OF SAID CURVE AND THE BEGINNING OF A COUNTERCLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 225.00 FEET;
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05° 34' 16" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 21.88 FEET (CHORD BEARS: S 48° 06' 07" E - 21.87 FEET)
TO THE END OF SAID CURVE;
N 39° 06' 45" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET;
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 103° 55' 45" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.35 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 01° 04' 37" E - 39.38
FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE;
N 53° 02' 30" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 90.53 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COUNTERCLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 688.50 FEET;
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11° 06' 01" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 133.39 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 47° 29' 29" E - 133.18
FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE;
N 41° 56' 29" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 538.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 25.489 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, AS
SURVEYED ON THE GROUND. BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED ON GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION.
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALECASTLEGATE DRIVEW.
S
.
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
GREENS PRAIRIE ROADVICTORIA AVENUEGREENS PRAIRIE ROAD WF:\_____15-411 Castlegate II Section 210\FINAL PLAT\Castlegate II Section 210.dwg, Final Plat
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 4
July 20, 2017
FINAL PLAT
for
The Crossing at Lick Creek, Phase 2
FP2016-000018
SCALE: 43 residential lots and 2 common areas on 22 acres
LOCATION: 13500 Rock Prairie Road, generally located south of the
William D Fitch Parkway and West of Williams Creek
Subdivision.
ZONING: R-1B Single-Family Residential
APPLICANT: Bernie Bernard
PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Bombek, Senior Planner
mbombek@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 4
July 20, 2017
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 4
July 20, 2017
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 4
July 20, 2017
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: Part of the property was annexed in 1983, the remaining portion
was annexed in 1994
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (upon annexation),
R1-B Single-Family Residential (2012)
Preliminary Plat: Approved in 2015. The approval included the use of fee-in-lieu of
sidewalk construction for portions of the sidewalk required along
Rock Prairie Road.
Site Development: The property has an abandoned oil well site with the majority of
the property being vacant and densely vegetated.
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: Fee in lieu of Parkland dedication in the amount of $1,261 per
single-family lot will be due prior to filing the Final Plats for this
development.
Greenways: No greenway dedication is required or proposed.
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks are required on both sides of all streets located within
this development.
Bicycle Connectivity: Future Bike lanes are anticipated along Rock Prairie Road
according to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master
Plan. These bike lanes will be installed with the future
reconstruction of Rock Prairie Road.
Impact Fees: This tract is subject to citywide impact fees: water, sanitary
sewer, and roadway. Impact fees will be dependent upon timing
of the building permit application date.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance:
The subject property is classified as Restricted Suburban on the Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use and Character Map. The tract is currently governed by R1-B Single-
Family Residential zoning district. The Final Plat is in compliance with the applicable
sections of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO).
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance
with the approved Preliminary Plan and Subdivision Regulations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
(4 ~‘~FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.:________________
DATE SUBMITTED:_____________
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION TIME:
Home of TexajA?,M University’STAFF:_______________________
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one)~Minor ~Amending ~Final ~Vacating ~Replat
($700)($700)($932)($932)($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ?~Yes ~No Is this plat Commercial ~or Residential ~
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
$700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
$233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
$600 (minimum)Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1%of acceptable Engineer’s Estimate for public infrastructure,$600 minimum (if fee is>$600,the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
Copy of plat.(A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
Grading,drainage,and erosion control plan with supporting drainage report.
Public infrastructure plan and supporting documents (if applicable).
Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
Title report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens,
encumbrances,etc.
~The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE:A paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.will be due at
the time of the mylar submittal prior to filing the plat.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference 1-21-2015
NAME OF PROJECT The Crossing at Lick Creek,Phase 2
ADDRESS 13500 Rock Prairie Rd E
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
Rock Prairie Road East adjacent to Lick Creek Park
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Bernie Bernard E-mail berniebernard@tdi-bi.com
Street Address 14391 S.Dowling Road
City College Station State ~Zip Code 77845
Phone Number (979)2203804 Fax Number _______________________________
Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION (All owners must be identified.Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name TDI-B rooks Developments, LLC E-mail berniebernard~tdi-bL corn
Street Address 14391 S.Dowling Road
City College Station State ~Zip Code 77845
Phone Number (979)220-3804 Fax Number _________________________________
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER’S INFORMATION:
Name Schultz Engineering, LLC -Joe Schultz E-mail /oe~schultzeng.com
Street Address 2730 Longrnire Drive,Suite A
City College Station State 7)<’Zip Code 77842
Phone Number (979)7643900 Fax Number (979)764 -3910
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property?IZ~Yes ~No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property?If so,please provide the Volume 130 3Z.and Page No.51/
Total Acreage 22.063 Total No.of Lots 43 R-O-WAcreage 3.134
Existing Use Vacant Proposed Use Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District 43 I RS I I _______
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.360 /RS ______ ______ ______,,,______
Floodplain Acreage 0
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels)on the property?fl Yes ~No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance.Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
~Yes
flNo
If yes,provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:The Crossing at Lick Creek (PP)
City Project Number (if known):PP2OI 5-900097
Date!Timeframe when submitted:March 2015
Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
IA
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
VIA
Regarding the waiver request,explain how:
1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or injurious to other
property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1.fl An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2.fl The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative,or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City’s comprehensive Plan;
3.~A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk.Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12)months;
4.fl Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate /
rural context;
5.fl When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle,Pedestrian,and
Greenways Master Plan;
4.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the Drovisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 9
6.fl The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or
7.E The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification,in the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NOTE:A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participation Watedme -8”to 12”
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:2838 Streets
No.of acres to be dedicated +$_________development fee
~Sidewalks
_______No.of acres in floodplain1865_Sanitary Sewer Lines
No.of acres in detention2389_Water Lines
No.of acres in greenways813Channels
OR1868StormSewers
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
Bike Lanes I Paths ‘~3 No.of SF Dwelling Units X $_1261 =$54,180
3312015 (date)Approved by Parks &Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE:DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true,correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more
than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf.LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
-Ji14~)4(JA1~4f~~oi~
ignature and ti 1€6’)‘j,≤~,t..Date
Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 9
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1.No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2.The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3.If revoked,all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4.Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5.The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6.Other permits may be required to fulfill local,state,and federal requirements.Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOl and SWPPP.
7.If required,Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre
pour) and post construction.
8.Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9.If,stormwater mitigation is required,including detention ponds proposed as part of this project,it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10.In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station,measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction,erosion,and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities.All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11.The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications,and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12.Release of plans to __________________________________ (name or firm)is authorized for bidding purposes
only.I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13.I,THE OWNER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE,AND
ACC1J~ATE./
)~j~V~EF~~-~~i(
~f~erty Owner(s)TOL%1OO1~≤Date
OV~L~o/#.5~1≤LL~
Engineer Certification:
1.The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation,including detention ponds,proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2.I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local,State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOI and SWPPP.Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES:i.e.,projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3.The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines.All develoi in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station ulations.
4.I,THE ENGINEER,AGREE 1 LL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT E,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE,AND
TE.
—
Date
Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 9
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans,Final Plats,Construction Plans,Fill I Grading Permits,and Clearing Only
Permits :*
A.I,_______________________________________certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study,that the
alterations or development covered by this permit,shall not:
(i)increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii)create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii)decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second.This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv)reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor
(v)increase Base Flood velocities.
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engineer Date
Initial
*If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
______letter in lieu of certification.
Required for Site Plans,Final Plats,Construction Plans,and Fill I Grading Permits:
B.I,_______________________________,certifytothefollowing:
(i)that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm.
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C.I,_______________________________________,certify that the construction, improvement,or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation.I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
Revised 5/15 Page 6 of 9
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D.I,_______________________________________certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor,including all utilities,ductwork and any basement,at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour)and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E.I,_______________________________________,certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor,including all
utilities,ductwork and basements,elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer!Surveyor Date
OR
I,____________________________________________,certify that the structure with its attendant utility,ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities,ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation,and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre
pour) and post construction.
Engineer!Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval:_______________________________________________________________
Revised 5/15 Page 7 of 9
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
~Drawn on 24”x 36”sheet to scale of 100 per inch.
~Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits.No scale required but include north arrow.
~Title Block with the following information:
~Name and address of subdivider,recorded owner, planner,engineer and surveyor.
~Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name &street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911.)
~Date of preparation.
~Engineer’s scale in feet.
~Total area intended to be developed.
~North Arrow.
~Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.
~If more than I sheet,an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
~All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
~Ownership and Dedication
~Surveyor and/or Engineer
~City Engineer (and City Planner,if a minor plat)
~Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
~Brazos County Clerk
~Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only)
~If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements,submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created.
~If using private septic systems,add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner’s
Court of Brazos County,pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code.
~Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available
data.
~Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol)and clearly tied to basic survey data.
~Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2).
~The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area,center
angle,degree of curvature,tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary with the subdivision,as well as,those within the subdivision).
Existing Proposed
Streets.Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac,stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
~Public and private R.O.W.locations and widths.(All existing and proposed R.O.W.’s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance.
Revised 5/15 Page 8 of 9
Existing Proposed
D Alleys.
Easements.
~A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially).
~Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages.All proposed dedications must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration.
~Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24”x 36”sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following:
~Street,alley and sidewalk plans,profiles and sections.One sheet must show the overall
street,alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision.(may be combined with other
utilities).
Sewer Design Report.
Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades.One sheet must show the
overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility
master plan and any future growth areas.)
Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report.
Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves,etc.with plan and profile lines showing
depth and grades.One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision.
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas.)
Storm drainage system plan with contours,street profile,inlets,storm sewer and
drainage channels, with profiles and sections.Drainage and runoff areas,and runoff
based on 5,10,25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design,
channel lining design &detention if used.One sheet must show the overall drainage
layout of the subdivision.
~Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
~Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee /surety in accordance with UDO
Section 8.6.
~Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
~All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a
volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed.
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled
for P&Z Commission consideration.
~Are there impact fees associated with this development?D Yes D No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
~Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way?~Yes ~No
If yes,TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
NOTE:1.We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing
the plat at the Courthouse.
2.If the construction area is greater than 5 acres,EPA Notice of Intent (NOl) must be submitted prior to
issuance of a development permit.
Print Form
Revised 5/15 Page 9 of 9
Planning & Zoning Commission
July 20, 2017
Page 1 of 9
Final Plat
for
Rio Grande Subdivision
Lot 1 Block 1, Lots 1-14 Block 2, Lots 1-3 Block 3 and Lots 1-41 Block 4
FP2015-000004
SCALE: 67 residential lots and 2 common areas on approximately 7.24
acres
LOCATION: 2021 Harvey Mitchell Parkway S, generally located northeast of
the intersection of Harvey Mitchell Parkway South with Rio
Grande Blvd, and west of Southwood Drive.
ZONING: T Townhouse and NAP Natural Areas Protected
APPLICANT: Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP
PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Bombek, Senior Planner
mbombek@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning & Zoning Commission
July 20, 2017
Page 2 of 9
Planning & Zoning Commission
July 20, 2017
Page 3 of 9
Planning & Zoning Commission
July 20, 2017
Page 4 of 9
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1969
Zoning: Neighborhood Business District C-N upon annexation
Partially rezoned Townhouse-Rowhouse District R-3 (1978)
Rezoned T Townhouse and NAP Natural Areas Protected (2014)
Site development: In 2008, a preliminary plan was approved for an 8.255 acre tract
containing this piece of property. However, a final plat was never
submitted. A new preliminary plan was approved May 21, 2015
and infrastructure has been constructed as noted below.
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication Fees: Parkland dedication fees in the $1,636 per townhouse lot is will be
collected prior to filing the Final Plat for this development.
Greenways: None proposed or required for this development. Property
adjacent to Bee Creek Tributary B, which includes property zoned
NAP Natural Areas Protected and 100-year floodplain, is being
platted as Common Area and for detention.
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks are required for this development along both sides of all
streets within the development except for alleys and the bulb of
the cul-de-sac.
Bicycle Connectivity: There is an existing multi-use path along Harvey Mitchell Parkway
South. There is also a future multi-use path that is expected to run
along the western boundary of this property through the Bee
Creek Tributary B. No portion of the proposed multi-use path is
required to be built with this development.
Impact Fees: The tract is subject to citywide impact fees: water, sanitary sewer,
and roadway. Impact fees will be dependent upon timing of the
building permit application date.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The
majority of the property is classified as Urban on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
and Character Map, and a small portion along the creek is designated Natural Areas-
Reserved. The plat meets the respective minimum requirements for T Townhouse and NAP
Natural Areas Protected zoning.
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with
the previously approved Preliminary Plan and the Subdivision Regulations contained in the
Unified Development Ordinance.
Planning & Zoning Commission
July 20, 2017
Page 5 of 9
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning & Zoning Commission
July 20, 2017
Page 1 of 5
Final Plat
for
Harvey Road Subdivision
Phase 1
FP2017-000009
SCALE: 1 lot and 2 common areas on approximately 17 acres
LOCATION: 3210 Harvey Road, generally located west of the intersection of
State Highway 30 and Linda Lane.
ZONING: MF Multi-Family and NAP Natural Areas Protected
APPLICANT: Jon Belanger, Cypressbrook Company
PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Bombek, Senior Planner
mbombek@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning & Zoning Commission
July 20, 2017
Page 2 of 5
Planning & Zoning Commission
July 20, 2017
Page 3 of 5
Planning & Zoning Commission
July 20, 2017
Page 4 of 5
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: June 1980
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation renamed R Rural in
2013,
Portion rezoned to GC General Commercial and NAP Natural
Area Protected in 2016,
Remaining portion rezoned to MF Multi-Family and NAP Natural
Area Protected in 2017
Preliminary Plan: Approved in April of 2017. The approval included a request to
pay fee-in-lieu of sidewalk construction for a portion along
Harvey Road in phase 2 of this development.
Site development: Vacant
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: Fee in lieu of Parkland dedication in the amount of $687.00 per
bedroom will be due prior to the issuance of building permits for
the multi-family portion of this plan.
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: A six foot wide sidewalk will be constructed along Harvey Road
the entire length of Phase 1.
Bicycle Connectivity: The Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan identifies
Harvey Road as an existing bicycle route. Separated bike lanes
are not proposed for this roadway at this time.
Oversize Request: N/A
Impact Fees: This tract is subject to citywide impact fees: water, sanitary sewer,
and roadway. Impact fees will be dependent upon timing of the
building permit application date.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance:
The subject property is classified as Urban on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
and Character Map. The tract is currently governed by two different zoning districts be MF
Multi-Family and NAP Natural Areas Protected. The Final Plat is in compliance with the
applicable sections of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO).
Planning & Zoning Commission
July 20, 2017
Page 5 of 5
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance
with the approved preliminary plan and Subdivision Regulations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Final Plat
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
$600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
$700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
$233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
Copy of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) Minor Amending Final Vacating Replat
Is this plat in the ETJ?
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
NOTE: A paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. will be due at
the time of the mylar submittal prior to filing the plat.
Is this plat Commercial No
($700)($700)($932)($932)($932)
The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 9
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
ADDRESS
NAME OF PROJECT
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITTED:
TIME:
STAFF:
Public infrastructure plan and supporting documents (if applicable).
Grading, drainage, and erosion control plan with supporting drainage report.
or Residential
Cypressbrook Company - Jon Belanger jbelanger@cypressbrook.com
1776 Woodstead Court, Suite 218
The Woodlands TX 77380
832.403.2864
October 19, 2016
Southeast Side of Harvey Road Between Veterans Parkway and Linda Lane
000801-0004-0040
Harvey Road Subdivision
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page No.
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property?
Total Acreage Total No. of Lots R-O-W Acreage
Existing Use Proposed Use
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
/ / / /
Number of Lots By Zoning District / / /
Floodplain Acreage
Name E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
Yes No
Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 9
Street Address
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name E-mail
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
NoYesIs there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property?
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:
Date / Timeframe when submitted:
City Project Number (if known):
16.845 1 0.173
Vacant Residential
4.441
1 MF
10.590
Schultz Engineering, LLC - Joe Schultz, PE eng@schultzeng.com
911 Southwest Parkway E
College Station TX 77840
979.764.3900 979.764.3910
MF
1776 Woodstead Court, Suite 218
Cypressbrook Harvey Road, LP jbelanger@cypressbrook.com
The Woodlands TX 77381
832.403.2864
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 9
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate /
rural context;
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6.[]The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or
7.U The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway /Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification,in the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
NOTE:A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participation~
NOTE:DIGITAL COPY OF FLAT MUST BE SUBMITIED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true,coirecL~and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.if there is more
than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.if the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behaff.LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Date
5’/~~’~±~-
of condition identified above:
ACREAGE:
Parkiand Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
N/A_Streets
1442_Sidewalks
N/A_Sanitary Sewer Lines
N/A_Water Lines
N/A_Channels
N/A Storm Sewers
N/A_Bike Lanes I Paths
N/A No.of acres to be dedicated +$_________
N/A No.of acres in floodplain
N/A No.of acres in detention
development fee
N/A No.of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
No.of SF Dwelling Units X $______=$
N/A (date)Approved by Parks &Recreation Advisory Board
Signature and title
Vi~e ~~
Revised 5115 Page 4 of 9
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1.No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2.The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3.If revoked,alt work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4.Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5.The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6.Other permits may be required to fulfill local,state,and federal requirements.Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP.
7.If required,Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pit-
pour)and post construction.
8.Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9.If,stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project,it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station,measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, erosion,and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets,or
existing drainage facilities.All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project.All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11.The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the CIty of College Station, Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications,and Standard Details.All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12.Release of plans to _________________________________(name or firm)is authorized for bidding purposes
only.I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13.I,THE OWNER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE,AND
ACCURATE.
~_____________
Property Owner(s)Date
Engineer Certification:
1.The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation,including detention ponds,proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2.1 will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES:i.e.,projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3.The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines.All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations.
4.1,THE ENGINEER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
___o&/o’/17
Date
Page 5 of 9Revised 5/15
C—
C
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans,Final Plats,Construction Plans,Fill I Grading Permits,and Clearing Only
Permits:*
A.I,____________________________________certify,as demonstrated in the attached drainage study,that the
alterations or development covered by this permit,shall not:
(i)increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii)create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii)decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second.This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater~
(iv)reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area;nor
(v)increase Base Flood velocities.
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
ô~~/oijr7
Engineer Date
Initial
*If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
______letter in lieu of certification.
Required for Site Plans,Final Plats,Construction Plans,and Fill I Grading Permits~
B.I,________________________________,certify to the following:
(i)that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm.
...........................-~———.~2~J0I/17
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C.I,D~r~ç)o~j E~i’J ,certify that the construction,improvement,or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation.I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
1 ~m.___________________________
Engineer Date
Revised 5/15 Page 6 af 9
, certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction.
D. I,
Engineer / Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval:
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Page 7 of 9Revised 5/15
E. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
Commercial Structures:
Residential Structures:
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
DateEngineer / Surveyor
OR
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
DateEngineer / Surveyor
I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork,
If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created.
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
North Arrow.
Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.
If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's
Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code.
Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available
data.
Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data.
Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2).
The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center
angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision).
Existing Proposed
Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance.
Revised 5/15 Page 8 of 9
Ownership and Dedication
Surveyor and/or Engineer
City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat)
Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
Brazos County Clerk
Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only)
All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow.
Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch.
Title Block with the following information:
Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911.)
Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor.
Date of preparation.
Engineer's scale in feet.
Total area intended to be developed.
NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing
the plat at the Courthouse.
2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOI) must be submitted prior to
issuance of a development permit.
Alleys.
Easements.
A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially).
Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration.
Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following:
Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall
street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other
utilities).
Sewer Design Report.
Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the
overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility
master plan and any future growth areas.)
Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report.
Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing
depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision.
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas.)
Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and
drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff
based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design,
channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage
layout of the subdivision.
Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a
volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed.
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled
for P&Z Commission consideration.
Are there impact fees associated with this development?
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way?
If yes, TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
Yes No
Yes No
Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee / surety in accordance with UDO
Section 8.6.
Existing Proposed
Revised 5/15 Page 9 of 9
STATE HIGHWAY
3
0
(
H
A
R
V
E
Y
R
O
A
D
)
COMMON
AREA 2 &
PRIVATE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
COMMON
AREA 1 &
PRIVATE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
LOT 1
11.23 AC.
BLOCK 1
1.76 AC.
3.86 AC.
STATE HIGHWAY 30 (HARVEY ROAD)BFE: 258'BFE: 260'BFE:
262
'
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:
FINAL PLAT
HARVEY ROAD SUBDIVISION
PHASE 1
16.845 ACRES
RICHARD CARTER LEAGUE, A-8
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS
PHASE 1
1 LOT
BLOCK 1, LOT 1
COMMON AREAS 1 & 2
SCALE 1'' = 60'
JULY 2017
LEGEND
LEGEND
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE HARVEY ROADLI
N
D
A
L
A
N
E
RANCHERO ROADCITY LIMIT LINESURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
OWNER
Cypressbrook Harvey Road, LP
1776 Woodstead Court, Suite 218
The Woodlands, TX 77380
832.403.2864
DEVELOPER:
Cypressbrook Company
1776 Woodstead Court, Suite 218
The Woodlands, TX 77380
832.403.2864
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
OF A
16.845 ACRE TRACT
RICHARD CARTER LEAGUE, A-8
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING
AND BEING SITUATED IN THE RICHARD CARTER LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 8, COLLEGE STATION,
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED
28.57 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO THE SUMMIT CROSSING, LLC
RECORDED IN VOLUME 8491, PAGE 52 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY,
TEXAS, AND ALL OF A CALLED 11.37 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO KATE ROMAIN
RECORDED IN VOLUME 8499, PAGE 21 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY,
TEXAS.
SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
HARVEY HILLSIDES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 263, PAGE 489 OF THE
DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, MARKING THE NORTH CORNER OF LOT 8, BLOCK
3, AND THE EAST CORNER OF SAID 11.37 ACRE TRACT;
THENCE: ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 11.37 ACRE TRACT AND SAID REMAINDER OF
28.57 ACRE TRACT AND SAID BLOCK 3 FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS:
S 42° 10' 40" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 362.71 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING
THE WEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8 AND THE NORTH CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 3;
S 41° 02' 24" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 370.11 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING
THE WEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10 AND THE NORTH CORNER OF LOT 12, BLOCK 3;
S 41° 11' 42" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 369.83 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING
THE WEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 12 AND THE NORTH CORNER OF LOT 14, BLOCK 3;
S 40° 59' 03" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 369.69 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING
THE WEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 14 AND THE NORTH CORNER OF LOT 16, BLOCK 3;
S 42° 32' 43" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.52 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD MARKING THE
SOUTH CORNER OF THIS HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT;
THENCE: N 47° 42' 16" W THROUGH SAID REMAINDER OF 28.57 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE
OF 399.48 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD SET ON THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO.
30 MARKING THE WEST CORNER OF THIS HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT;
THENCE: ALONG THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 30 FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS:
N 33° 17' 22" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 738.25 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE
HAVING A RADIUS OF 2757.32 FEET, FOR REFERENCE A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND BEARS: N
00° 33' 21" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 0.17 FEET, AND A CONCRETE RIGHT-OF-WAY MARKER
FOUND ON THE NORTHWEST LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 30 BEARS: N 56° 42' 38" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 119.98 FEET;
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09° 00' 34" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF
433.58 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 37° 47' 39" E - 433.13 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE, FOR
REFERENCE A CONCRETE RIGHT-OF-WAY MARKER FOUND BEARS: S 48° 33' 16" W FOR A
DISTANCE OF 2.20 FEET;
N 42° 17' 56" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 338.40 FEET TO THE NORTH CORNER OF SAID 11.37 ACRE
TRACT AND THE WEST CORNER OF BLOCK 4, HARVEY HILLSIDES, ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 264, PAGE 484 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY,
TEXAS;
THENCE:S 49° 15' 45" E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 11.37 ACRE TRACT AND SAID
BLOCK 4, AND THE AFOREMENTIONED BLOCK 3, HARVEY HILLSIDES, FOR A DISTANCE OF
524.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 28.294 ACRES OF LAND AS SURVEYED
ON THE GROUND MARCH, 2016. BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED ON THE TEXAS
STATE PLANE CENTRAL ZONE GRID NORTH (NAD-83) PER THE PUBLISHED COORDINATES OF
THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION GPS MONUMENT CS94-126 AND AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS
OBSERVATION. DISTANCES SHOWN HEREIN ARE GRID DISTANCES. TO DETERMINE SURFACE
(GROUND) DISTANCES MULTIPLY BY A COMBINED SCALED FACTOR OF 1.00010092035446
(CALCULATED USING GEOID12A).
SHEET 1 OF 2
July 20, 2017
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – Chimney Hill Development
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Mark Bombek AICP, Senior Planner
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing
the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned
Development District for approximately 8 acres in the Chimney Hill Retail Plaza Lots 1-4,
Block 1, generally located at 701 & 715 University Drive East. Case #REZ2017-000013
(Final action on this item is scheduled for the August 10, 2017 City Council Meeting- subject to
change)
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request with the condition that
Sidewalks be added to the Concept Plan along Tarrow Street, as identified on the Bicycle,
Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan.
Summary: This PDD Planned Development District request proposes to amend the existing
PDD to realign it with the current vision for the development. This property was previously
owned by the City of College Station and was sold in 2014 in conjunction with an adopted
economic development agreement that provided an additional level of regulation with the PDD.
Due to the changed direction for the development, a request has been made to City Council to
dissolve this agreement. This will be considered at an upcoming meeting for City Council.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as
General Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use and Character Map
and is within the area identified as the Hospitality Corridor along University Drive East.
The proposed project has sought to redevelop an aging shopping center along one of
the College Station’s primary image corridors. The site was originally constructed in the
late 1970s and the proposed project will retain mostly commercial retail uses, but is
allowed to develop some residential uses that provides a mix of uses in line with an urban
development pattern.
The subject property is surrounded by thoroughfares and developed property zoned GC
General Commercial with OV Corridor Overlay. The proposed development will continue
the commercial nature of the immediate vicinity while allowing residential uses in which
the parking will be accommodated within a parking garage. Given the amount of access
and proximity to major thoroughfares, commercial uses remain suitable for this centrally
located property. A greater intensity of uses though, is commonly needed to support the
costs associated with a redevelopment project of this nature. While marketable as a
commercial-only property, the opportunity provided by redevelopment allows for the
creation of a unique, destination-based development along one of the City’s main
corridors.
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood: The uses requested for the PDD are those
allowed under the current PDD that utilizes a base zoning district of GC General
Commercial and R-6 High Density Multi-Family, Given the current development pattern of
the area being primarily commercial retail and office uses, the proposed uses of the subject
property are compatible.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The property is
located at the intersection of a 6-lane Major Arterial, University Drive, and 4-lane Minor
Arterial, Tarrow Street. This is a suitable location for a large scale commercial development
that could serve as an anchor for the University Drive Corridor and hopefully spur the
redevelopment of other underutilized properties in an area that is beginning to show a
demand for increased urban development.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The size
and location of the property is suitable for intense commercial and residential uses. With its
location at the intersection of two thoroughfares, the uses allowed under the General
Commercial and R-6 High Density Multi-Family zoning districts are suitable for this property
with the modifications listed in the Concept Plan notes.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
property is currently marketable various commercial and residential uses under the existing
PDD Planned Development District. The purpose of the request is to amend the concept
plan and existing language to align the ordinance with the current vision for the
development.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for the proposed use: There is a 12-inch water line along East
Tarrow, a 20-inch water line along Tarrow Street, and an 8-inch sanitary sewer line off East
Tarrow to serve the property. Storm drainage is to Burton Creek and post-development
flows will not be able to exceed pre-development flows. Drainage and other public
infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in
accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. Existing infrastructure appear to
have capacity to adequate serve the proposed change of use at this time.
Access to the subject tract will be via Tarrow Street/East Tarrow, a four-lane Minor Arterial,
and University Drive East, a six-lane Major Arterial. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was
submitted as part of this rezoning application. Based on the analysis, an additional right-
turn lane is required on Tarrow Street for the southbound approach to University Drive
East as it falls below the acceptable level of service with the forecasted and site-generated
traffic. A right-turn deceleration lane will be required for the proposed consolidated
driveway from University Drive East due to the anticipated volume of right turns into the
site.
SUMMARY OF EXISTING PDD AND CONCEPT PLAN (The change with this request is
shown in bold)
The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building and
parking areas as well as other site related features. The request is revising the Concept Plan
to eliminate specific building footprints and building locations to allow more flexibility
with site development. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also request variations to the
general site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by
demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development.
The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for
reviewing PDD Concept Plans:
The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony
with the character of the surrounding area;
The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with
the intent and purpose of this Section;
The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not
adversely affect adjacent development;
Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public
street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners
association;
The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not
limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities;
The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular,
bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to
be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area
considering existing zoning and land uses in the area.
The applicant has provided the following information related to the purpose and intent of
the proposed zoning district:
“The purpose and intent of the PDD is to encourage the redevelopment of an
existing underperforming retail center along the University Drive Hospitality
Corridor. The new development will provide a destination for residents and visitors
to shop, dine, live, and recreate in a more urban environment. Introducing high
density residential land uses and more urban development standards will incent
the major reinvestment of an underutilized property in a prominent area of College
Station.”
The Concept Plan proposes three main quadrants that will be utilized for building
area and other accessory site development features such as parking and drive
aisles and areas for landscaping. These quadrants will be further defined with a
replat that will subdivide the property creating smaller internal lot boundaries.
The two driveways along University Drive East will be consolidated into one with a right-
turn deceleration lane provided. The existing driveway location on East Tarrow with left-
turn lane will remain and three new driveways are proposed along Tarrow Street. Such
drives will align with the existing drives and/or streets located on the opposite side
of Tarrow Street (and “Opposite Left Drive”) or will be offset at least one hundred
twenty-five feet (125’) from such Opposite Left Drive. The Concept Plan attached is
conceptual in nature and, accordingly the number and configuration of the building
and parking areas may not be exactly as shown on the Concept Plan.
Base Zoning and Meritorious Modifications
The development will utilize GC General Commercial and R-6 High Density Multi-Family as the
base zoning districts.
Permitted Uses
GC General Commercial uses along with multi-family land uses as allowed in R-6 High
Density Multi-Family Permitted are permitted Note: the previous PDD planned for a
pedestrian-oriented outdoor plaza designed for community events that include a
pavilion, tower architectural feature, outdoor sales, display and other park-like
amenities. This feature is no longer being provided with the revisions made in the new
zoning request.
Density
The maximum residential density is 30 units per acre as per the R-6 High Density Multi-
Family zoning district.
Setbacks
Instead of standard zoning setbacks, the applicant has proposed:
Minimum Front Setback (along University Drive East) 20 feet (normally 25
feet) Minimum Side Setback (between buildings) 7.5 feet
Minimum Side Street Setback (along East Tarrow) 15 feet
Minimum Rear Setback (along Tarrow Street) 10 feet (normally 15 feet)
Height
Building height will be regulated by GC General Commercial and R-6 High Density Multi-
Family base zoning districts. Building heights will range between one and eight stories.
Note: the previous PDD proposed a maximum building height of seven stories.
Minimum Driveway Throat Length
A minimum driveway throat length (also known as throat depth) as defined in UDO
Section 12-7.4.C.7.h. of forty (40) feet is required on all entry drives connecting to Tarrow
Street and East Tarrow Street, except for the entry drive on Tarrow Street located closest
to University Drive which may have a minimum driveway throat length of thirty-five (35)
feet provided a second entry drive from Tarrow Street to the Property is constructed.
Sidewalks
Sidewalks shall only be required in the development along University Drive and along
one side of the interior access drive that connects University Drive to the internal traffic
circle. Additionally as shown on the Concept Plan, sidewalks are being provided along
East Tarrow with this development. The Bicycle Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan
identifies sidewalks along the entire perimeter of the development. The applicant is
requesting to not provide sidewalks along Tarrow Street.
As stated previously in the recommendation, staff is recommending that sidewalks be
built along Tarrow Street in compliance with the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways
Master Plan. A project has been identified to build a sidewalk along the western side of
Tarrow Street that will tie into a connection into the City of Bryan. It is planned for this
sidewalk to extend down to University Drive with this property acting as the connection
point along East Tarrow and Tarrow Street. Providing sidewalks along the perimeter of
this development is crucial to the long-term connectivity anticipated in this area.
Parking
Parking for multi-family residential uses will be as follows per unit: 1 parking space for
the first bedroom in the unit and 0.5 parking space for each additional bedroom in the
unit. A “unit” is considered to be a multi-family housing unit containing one or more
bedrooms, a kitchen and common living areas. Non-residential parking will be 1 parking
space per 250 gross square feet with no increase for restaurants and more intense commercial
uses as defined by the Unified Development Ordinance.
Other Meritorious Modifications
Off-Street Parking Standards: Minimum parking lot setback is reduced to 8 feet along
Tarrow Street with double landscape islands not being required every seven parking
spaces.
Right-of-Way Dedication: No additional right-of-way is anticipated for University Drive East,
East Tarrow, or Tarrow Street unless needed for the additional turn-lane mitigation.
Non-Residential Architecture Standards: Accessory buildings and parking garages are
exempt from the requirements except that parking garages may be constructed of a pre-cast
concrete product and painted to complement abutting buildings.
Signage
The sign regulations for the base zoning districts of GC General Commercial and R-6
High Density Multi-Family will be utilized for this development with the following modifications:
Signs may be approved administratively by staff with appeals to staff’s interpretations
to be considered by the Design Review Board;
Wayfinding signage (UDO Section 12-7.5.AA Campus Wayfinding Signs) is permitted
for this development and may also be located at street intersections including
driveways with parking;
In addition to one freestanding sign, low profile signs are allowed at one per building;
Light pole signage may be utilized along the interior access drives and traffic circle
only and is limited to a maximum of 14 light pole signs with 36 square feet per light
pole. These signs are not in lieu of freestanding signage, and are intended as
development identification and special event signage, will not be utilized for tenant
signage, and do not count against attached signage. (Note: This signage was
originally being utilized as part of the pedestrian plaza that was proposed with the
original PDD. This signage is intended to be utilized for the same purposes, but
placed along the interior drive aisle instead of the surrounding the plaza.)
Apartment Identification signage is allowed with two detached signs – one placed
at University Drive East and East Tarrow and a second placed at University Drive East
and Tarrow Street only advertising the subdivision, development, or area. No
commercial tenant advertising shall occur on the Apartment Identification signs; and
Attached signage is permitted for all residential and non-residential buildings.
o The residential portion of the public entry façade shall be calculated in the
allowance for attached signage square footage.
o The facades of the commercial-only buildings along University Drive East are to be included in the public entry façade calculation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request with the condition that Sidewalks be added
to the Concept Plan along Tarrow Street, as identified on the Bicycle, Pedestrian and
Greenways Master Plan.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Background Information
2. Small Area Map and Aerial
3. Application
4. Concept Plan
5. Bulk variance list
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: July 20, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: August 10, 2017
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Chimney Hill HOA
Villas of Chimney Hill HOA
Property owner notices mailed: 23
Contacts in support: None at the time of staff report.
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of staff report.
Inquiry contacts: One
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North (across
Tarrow Street)
Suburban
Commercial
GC General
Commercial Office buildings
South (across
University Dr. E) General Commercial
GC General
Commercial with OV
Corridor Overlay
Shopping center and
restaurants
East (across
East Tarrow
Street)
General Commercial
GC General
Commercial with OV
Corridor Overlay
Hotel
West (across
Tarrow Street) General Commercial GC General
Commercial
Bank, shopping
center including
former Albertson’s
grocery
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1956
Zoning: GC General Commercial with OV Corridor Overlay
PDD Planned Development District 2014
Final Plat: 1975 with replats in 1984 & 1985
Site development: Majority of the site is vacant as a result of the demolition of the
previous shopping center. There is one building remaining on the
property being The Republic restaurant. This will remain until their
new building is constructed on site.
Notes:
1. There is no FEMA regulated 100-Year Floodplain on
this site per FEMA Map Panel #48041C0215F Dated
04/02/2014.
2. All site lighting will comply with City of College
Station ordinances.
3. The development will not include parks, greenways,
conservtion areas, schools, or trails.
BFV Chimney Hill, LLC
Chimney HIll Retail Plaza,
Lots 1-4, Block 1
7.95 AC
BFV Chimney Hill, LLC C/O Johnathan Hitchcock
24 Waterway Ave., Suite 225
Spring, TX
77380
(978) 376-3981
Mitchell & Morgan, LLP
3204 Earl Rudder Fwy. S.
College Station, TX
77845
(979) 260-6963
Oldham Goodwin Group
2800 S. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX
77802
(979) 268-2000
University Dri
v
e
(
R
.
O
.
W
.
V
a
r
i
e
s
)
The purpose and intent of the PDD is to encourage the redevelopment of an existing underperforming
retail center along the University Drive Hospitality Corridor. The new development of approximately
8 acres to be subdivided into two or more lots will provide a destination for residents and visitors to
shop, dine, live, and recreate in a more modern environment. Introducing high density residential land
uses and more modern development standards will incent the major reinvestment of an underutilized
property in a prominent area of College Station.
The Concept Plan proposes to demolish the existing buildings and construct commercial outparcels,
with some uses being up to eight stories, in phases. The two driveways along University Drive East
will be consolidated into one driveway with a right-turn deceleration lane provided. The existing
driveway location on East Tarrow with left-turn lane will remain. N ew driveways are proposed along
Tarrow Street. Such drives will align with the existing drives and/or streets located on the opposite
side of Tarrow Street (an “Opposite Left Drive’) or will be offset at least one hundred twenty-five
feet (125’) from such Opposite Left Drive. The Concept Plan attached as Exhibit “C” is conceptual
in nature and, accordingly, the lot lines, building areas, drives and parking areas of the Development
may not be in the exact numbers and locations shown on the Concept Plan.
Base Zoning and Meritorious Modifications
The development will utilize GC General Commercial and R-6 High Density Multi Family as the base
zoning districts. Through the PDD, the following meritorious modifications have been granted:
Permitted Uses
GC General Commercial uses along with multi-family land uses as allowed in R-6 High Density Multi-
Family zoning are permitted.
Density
The maximum residential density for the development is 30 units per acre to be calculated based on the
entire acreage of the Property and the total maximum number of units may be located on any one or more
lots within the Property.
Setbacks
Instead of standard zoning setbacks, the following will apply:
Minimum Front Setback (along University Drive East): 20 feet
Minimum Side Setback (between buildings): 7.5 feet
Minimum Side Street Setback (along East Tarrow Street): 15 feet
Minimum Rear Setback (along Tarrow Street): 10 feet
Height
Building height will be regulated by GC General Commercial and R-6 High Density Multi-Family
base zoning districts. Building heights will range between one and eight stories.
Minimum Driveway Throat Length
A minimum driveway throat length (also known as throat depth) as defined in UDO Section 12-7.4.C.7.h.
of forty (40) feet is required on all entry drives connecting to Tarrow Street and East Tarrow Street, except
for the entry drive on Tarrow Street located closest to University Drive which shall have a minimum
driveway throat length of thirty-five (35) feet provided a second entry drive from Tarrow Street to the
Property is constructed.
Sidewalks
Sidewalks shall only be required in the development along University Drive and along one side of the
interior access drive that connects University Drive to the internal traffic circle.
Parking
Parking for multifamily, residential uses will be as follows per unit: 1 parking space for the first bedroom
in the unit and 0.5 parking spaces for each additional bedroom in such unit. A “unit” is considered to be
a multifamily housing unit containing one or more bedrooms, a kitchen and common living areas. Non-
residential parking will be 1 parking space per 250 gross square feet with no increase for restaurants and
other more intense commercial uses as defined by the Unified Development Ordinance.
Off-Street Parking Standards: Minimum parking lot set back is reduced to 8 feet along all streets with
double landscape islands not being required every 7 parking spaces.
Right-of-Way Dedication: No additional right-of-way is anticipated for University Drive East, East
Tarrow Street, or Tarrow Street unless needed for the additional turn-lane mitigation.
Non-Residential Architecture Standards: Accessory buildings and parking garages are exempt from the
requirements except that parking garages must be painted to complement abutting buildings.
Signage
The sign regulations for the base zoning districts of GC General Commercial and R-6 High Density Multi-
Family will be utilized for this development with the following modifications:
Signs may be approved administratively by staff with appeals of staff’s interpretations to be
considered by the Design Review Board;
Wayfinding signage (UDO Section 12-7.5.AA Campus Wayfinding Signs) is permitted for this
development and may also be located at street intersections and on interior driveways;
In addition to one freestanding sign, low profile signs are allowed at one per building;
In addition to one freestanding sign and the low-profile signs, the following are allowed in the
development:
o Light pole signage may be utilized along the interior access drives and traffic circle only
and is limited to a maxim um of 14 light pole signs with 36 square feet per light pole. These
signs are not in lieu of freestanding signage, are intended as development identification
and special event signage, will not be utilized for tenant signage, and do not count against
attached signage limitations;
o Any R-6 based zoning identification signage is allowed with two detached signs one placed
at University Drive East and East Tarrow Street and a second placed at University Drive
East and Tarrow Street only advertising the subdivision, development, or area. No
commercial tenant advertising shall occur on the R-6 based zoning identification signs; and
Attached signage is permitted for all residential and non-residential buildings.
o The residential portion of the public entry façade shall be calculated in the allowance
for attached signage square footage.
o The facades of the commercial-only buildings along University Drive East are to be
included in the public entry façade calculation.
July 20, 2017
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – Conaway Tract
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Economic Development Manager
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from R Rural to GC General Commercial on approximately 35.91
acres of land being situated in the J.W. Scott Survey, Abstract No. 49 in College Station, Brazos
County, Texas, located at 4000 and 4002 University Drive East, and more generally located
south of the intersection of University Drive East and FM158 at the College Station city limit line.
Case #REZ2017-000016 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the July 27th City
Council meeting – subject to change)
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning.
Summary: The proposed City-initiated rezoning from R Rural to GC General Commercial is to
allow for infill commercial development opportunities in north College Station. The intent of
pursuing this entitlement at this time is to preserve potential commercial sites for future
development. The property is located at the intersection of two regionally significant roadways, a
location appropriate for general commercial development.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is designated on the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as General Commercial.
The General Commercial designation is described in the Comprehensive Plan as areas
intended for concentrations of commercial activities that cater to both nearby residents
and to the larger community or region. Generally these areas tend to be large in size,
located near the intersection of two regionally significant roads, and concentrated in
nodes within the community. The proposed rezoning is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
The City adopted the Economic Development Master Plan in 2012, with an over-arching
goal of a diversified economy generating quality, stable, full-time jobs; bolstering the
sales and property tax base; and contributing to a high quality of life. One of the strategic
initiatives for continued economic success is to support retail development by ensuring
that there are opportunities to locate and expand businesses that make College Station
a regional destination for retail services. The stated Master Plan goal for retail is as
follows: “The City of College Station will continue to recognize the significance of retail
expenditures to the local economy and will ensure that locations are ready to
accommodate the development of such opportunities and that the City remains
responsive to an ever-changing market.”
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property
and with the character of the neighborhood: The properties located immediately to
the north and west are located in the City of Bryan and are zoned and used as A-O
Agricultural-Open and Planned Development (multi-family), respectively. To the east is a
lawnmower repair business and a home, both zoned CI Commercial Industrial. To the
south is vacant land planned for future phases of Summit Crossing, a townhome and
duplex development.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The property
has approximately 1,200 feet of frontage on Boonville Road (FM 158), and
approximately 900 feet of frontage on University Drive East. The intersection of these
regionally significant roadways is suitable for General Commercial uses such as retail
and restaurant.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
property is currently zoned R Rural and is used for single-family and for agricultural
uses. The property is suitable for rural uses.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
subject property may be marketable with its current zoning of R Rural, however, the
requested rezoning provides an opportunity for regionally significant commercial
development and the intersection of two regionally significant roadways, where general
commercial land uses are most appropriate.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water and sewer service is
not currently available to this property. Off-site sewer extensions from the southeast will
be required for service to this tract. The City’s Water Master Plan requires 18-inch and
12-inch lines be extended with development of this property, and a future 12-inch
waterline will need to be extended with the future extension of Summit Crossing Lane.
Detention will be required with development of this property. Drainage and other public
infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in
accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. Future master planned
infrastructure, appear to be adequate for the proposed general commercial use at this
time.
The subject property has approximately 1,200 feet of frontage on Boonville Road (FM
158), designated a 6-lane Major Arterial and approximately 900 feet of frontage on
University Drive East, designated a 4-lane Major Arterial on the City’s Thoroughfare
Plan. Summit Crossing Lane, a future 2-lane Minor Collector, is proposed to be located
near the southwest property edge. Access to the site will likely be from University Drive,
Boonville Road and Summit Crossing Lane.
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required with the proposed rezoning as the
adjacent thoroughfares have been widened with medians and traffic signal installed at
the intersection of University Drive East and Boonville Road (FM 158). A TIA will be
required with the platting of the tracts which is closer to the time of development and will
identify traffic impact and site access needs at that time.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Background Information
2. Aerial & Small Area Map
3. Rezoning Map
Background
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: July 20, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Date: July 27, 2017
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
N/A
Property owner notices mailed: 9
Contacts in support: None at the time of staff report.
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of staff report.
Inquiry contacts: None at the time of staff report.
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North
(Across FM 158
in Bryan)
N/A City of Bryan - C-2 Retail
District and A-O
Agricultural-Open District
Vacant and single-
family homes
South
Urban GC General Commercial
and R Rural
Vacant
East
Urban and General
Commercial
PDD Planned
Development District for
Multi-family housing and
CI Commercial Industrial
Vacant and lawn
mower repair
West
(Across
University
Drive East in
Bryan)
N/A City of Bryan-PD for
Multi-family housing
Multi-family
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1980
Zoning: 1980 - Zoned A-O Agricultural-Open at the time of annexation.
2013 – A-O renamed R Rural
Final Plat: Unplatted
Site development: Undeveloped
Existing: R Rural
Proposed: GC General Commercial
ALLEYM O M E N T U M BL DANSBYLNM
A
R
C
Y
L
NEASTCHESTERDREA
S
T
C
R
E
S
T
D
R
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
D
R
SARA LNHICKSLNCROSSPARKDREASTCHESTER DRCROSSPARKDRHICKS LNUNIVERSITY DR EHARVEYRDSARALNBOONVILLE RD
MOM
E
N
T
UMBLDANSBYLNFM 158
July 20, 2017
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – 108, 110, 200 & 206 George Bush Drive East
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Economic Development Manager
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing t he
zoning district boundaries from GS General Suburban to GC General Commercial for
approximately one acre of land being College Hills Estates Block 18, Lots 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11, more
generally located at 108, 110, 200 & 206 George Bush Drive East. Case #REZ2017-000017
(Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the July 27th City Council meeting – subject to
change)
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning.
Summary: The proposed City-initiated rezoning from GS General Suburban to GC General
Commercial is to allow for infill commercial redevelopment opportunities in proximity to Texas
A&M University. The subject properties are located along the south side of George Bush Drive
East, just north of existing commercial development. The lots are currently developed as single-
family residential homes. While the properties are likely too small to redevelop for commercial
uses on their own, there is opportunity for consolidation of lots for a larger redevelopment effort.
As currently zoned, the properties could redevelop as single-family homes on a lot-by-lot basis,
potentially precluding future commercial redevelopment in the area. This area was identified by
Staff as a prime location for needed general commercial redevelopment and as a targeted area
for commercial preservation.
100, 102, 104, 106, 112, and 204 George Bush Drive East were recently rezoned to GC
General Commercial at the request of the property owners. Since that time, staff hosted a
property owner meeting to discuss the potential of City-initiated rezoning on the remainder of
the block. Two property owners in attendance preferred to retain the single-family zoning
designation on the property until the time that they sold their properties. Those properties are
located at the north end of the block and have not been included in this rezoning request.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is currently designated
on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Urban and
Redevelopment. This area is included in Redevelopment Area II in the Comprehensive
Plan, stating the following: includes a number of underperforming land uses that, due to
their proximity to two of the busiest corridors in the City, are poised for redevelopment.
Much of the area is currently subdivided into small lots, making it difficult to assemble
land for redevelopment. A portion of this area includes the current City Hall, which offers
the opportunity to redevelop a larger parcel if City Hall is relocated to the Municipal
Center District. The proximity of existing neighborhoods and the Texas A&M University
campus requires careful site planning and appropriate building design. These efforts
should be complimentary to the Area V: Hospitality corridor plan, the neighborhood plan
for the Eastgate area, and the Texas A&M University Campus Master Plan and should
focus on bringing vertical mixed-use and other aspects of urban character to this portion
of the City.
The Eastgate Neighborhood Plan includes discussion of this area and specifically states
the following: The block bounded by George Bush Drive East, Texas Avenue South and
Dominik Drive is split with two character designations. The lots on the north side of the
block that front George Bush Drive East are designated as Urban and Redevelopment in
the Comprehensive Plan and are developed as single-family residential. The lots on the
block face fronting Dominik Drive are designated as Urban Mixed Use and
Redevelopment and are developed with commercial uses. With aging commercial
properties and single-family rental dwellings, the area is poised for redevelopment and
consolidation of property on both sides of the block. In addition, given the block’s
location in the City and proximity to major thoroughfares, Texas Avenue South (six-lane
major arterial) and George Bush Drive East (four-lane major collector), more intense
development is anticipated. To create more consistency in the future development
pattern, both block faces should be designated Urban with an emphasis on creating
mixed-use opportunities.
Additionally, the City adopted the Economic Development Master Plan in 2012, with an
over-arching goal of a diversified economy generating quality, stable, full-time jobs;
bolstering the sales and property tax base; and contributing to a high quality of life. One
of the strategic initiatives for continued economic success is to support retail
development by ensuring that there are opportunities to locate and expand businesses
that make College Station a regional destination for retail services. The stated Master
Plan goal for retail is as follows: “The City of College Station will continue to recognize
the significance of retail expenditures to the local economy and will ensure that locations
are ready to accommodate the development of such opportunities and that the City
remains responsive to an ever-changing market.”
The proposed rezoning is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and related
master plans.
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property
and with the character of the neighborhood: Discrepancies currently exist in zoning
and future land use and character in the area that could lead to unintended development
scenarios that are contrary to the character desired by area residents. Lots along the
south side of George Bush Drive East are currently zoned GS General Suburban and
developed as single-family homes. Properties to the south are zoned GC General
Commercial and are developed as such. As the block is rezoned, consolidated, and
redeveloped, the proposed GC General Commercial zoning will be consistent and
compatible. The subject area is located at the periphery of the Eastgate neighborhood
in a redevelopment area.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The block is
surrounded by major thoroughfares. The proposed rezoning is for seven lots along the
south side of George Bush Drive East. The south side of the block (facing Dominik
Drive) is already zoned GC General Commercial. As properties continue to rezone for
redevelopment in this area and properties consolidate, the area becomes most suitable
for General Commercial uses such as retail and restaurant.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
subject properties along George Bush Drive East are currently zoned GS General
Suburban. The property is suitable for single-family residential uses, as they are
currently developed as such. The lots currently abut commercially zoned and developed
properties and are generally separated from the larger Eastgate neighborhood by
George Bush East Drive.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
subject properties are marketable with their current zoning of GS General Suburban;
however, the requested rezoning provides an opportunity for additional commercial
redevelopment near Texas A&M University. The existing zoning allows for the existing
single-family homes to be redeveloped for new single-family housing on a lot-by-lot
basis, potentially precluding redevelopment envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water service is available to
the properties from existing 8-inch waterline along the south side of George Bush Drive
East. A 6-inch sewer main is located at the rear of the lots closest to Texas Avenue and
an 8-inch sewer main is located in front of the properties that are located further from
Texas Avenue. Drainage is mainly to the southwest toward Texas Avenue. Drainage
and other public infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. Existing and
proposed infrastructure appear to be adequate for the proposed general commercial use
at this time.
The subject properties have individual residential driveways along George Bush Drive
East, designated a Major Collector on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. As properties
consolidate and redevelop, driveway access points will be consolidated and reduced.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Background Information
2. Aerial & Small Area Map
3. Rezoning Map
Background
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: July 20, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Date: July 27, 2017
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
College Hills Estates
Property owner notices mailed: 24
Contacts in support: None at the time of staff report.
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of staff report.
Inquiry contacts: One (1) at the time of staff report.
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North (Across George
Bush Drive East)
Natural Areas, Urban &
Redevelopment
GS General Suburban
City-owned,
undeveloped
South
Urban & Redevelopment GC General Commercial Retail and
Restaurant
East
(Across Texas
Avenue)
Urban & Redevelopment GS General Suburban Retail and
Restaurant
West
General Commercial &
Redevelopment
GC General Commercial Single-Family
Residential
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1939
Zoning: 1939 - Zoned for single-family use upon annexation.
2013 – R-1 Single-Family Residential renamed GS General
Suburban
Final Plat: 1940- College Hills Estates, Fourth Installment
Site development: Existing single-family homes
Existing: GS General Suburban
Proposed: GC General Commercial
F O S T E R A V
MOSS STGEORGE BUSH DRTE
X
A
S
A
V DOMINIK DRGEORGE BUSH DRGEORGE BUSH DR EFO S T E R A V
T
E
X
A
S
A
V
SMOSS ST
July 20, 2017
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – 1501 Earl Rudder Freeway South
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Economic Development Manager
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from CI Commercial Industrial to GC General Commercial on
approximately 8.158 acres of land located at 1501 Earl Rudder Freeway South, and more
generally located on the east side of Earl Rudder Freeway, north of Harvey Road. Case
#REZ2017-000018 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the July 27th City Council
meeting – subject to change)
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning.
Summary: The proposed City-initiated rezoning from CI Commercial Industrial to GC General
Commercial is to allow for infill commercial redevelopment opportunities along Earl Rudder
Freeway. The intent of pursuing rezoning at this time is to fully entitle the property for general
commercial uses encouraging redevelopment of the site. The property is located on the east
side of Earl Rudder Freeway, a location appropriate for general commercial development.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is designated on the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as General Commercial.
The General Commercial designation is described in the Comprehensive Plan as areas
intended for concentrations of commercial activities that cater to both nearby residents
and to the larger community or region. Generally these areas tend to be large in size,
located near the intersection of two regionally significant roads, and concentrated in
nodes within the community. The proposed rezoning is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
The City adopted the Economic Development Master Plan in 2012, with an over-arching
goal of a diversified economy generating quality, stable, full-time jobs; bolstering the
sales and property tax base; and contributing to a high quality of life. One of the strategic
initiatives for continued economic success is to support retail development by ensuring
that there are opportunities to locate and expand businesses that make College Station
a regional destination for retail services. The stated Master Plan goal for retail is as
follows: “The City of College Station will continue to recognize the significance of retail
expenditures to the local economy and will ensure that locations are ready to
accommodate the development of such opportunities and that the City remains
responsive to an ever-changing market.”
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property
and with the character of the neighborhood: The surrounding properties are zoned
GC General Commercial and developed as such.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The property
has approximately 300 feet of frontage on Earl Rudder Freeway South Frontage Road.
Earl Rudder Freeway South is College Station’s most regionally significant road and
properties in this area are generally suitable for General Commercial uses such as retail
and restaurant.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment:
Because of its size, location, and access to Earl Rudder Freeway Frontage Road, the
property is suitable for GC uses.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
property is currently zoned CI Commercial Industrial and is currently used as self-
storage, a permitted use in both CI and GC. When the property was zoned CI and
developed, College Station’s zoning was cumulative within the non-residential districts,
allowing both CI and GC uses in the CI district. The property is suitable for CI uses, but
because of its location, is more appropriate for GC uses.
Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: An 18-inch water line exists
along Earl Rudder Freeway and an 8-inch exists within the site. An 8-inch sewer line
exists through the property. Existing infrastructure appears to be adequate for the
proposed general commercial use at this time, however, water and sewer may need to
be upgraded depending on demands of future redevelopment on the site.
Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site redevelopment shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines.
The subject property has approximately 300 feet of frontage on Earl Rudder Freeway
South, a Freeway/Expressway on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. A Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) is not required for the rezoning of this property from CI Commercial
Industrial to GC General Commercial. A TIA may be required at the time of site
redevelopment depending upon the intensity of the proposed redeveloped use.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Background Information
2. Aerial & Small Area Map
3. Rezoning Map
Background
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: July 20, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Date: July 27, 2017
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
N/A
Property owner notices mailed: 6
Contacts in support: None at the time of staff report.
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of staff report.
Inquiry contacts: None at the time of staff report.
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North
General Commercial,
Urban and Natural Areas
GC General Commercial
Undeveloped
South
(Across SH6) Urban Mixed-Use GC General Commercial Post Oak Mall and
Plantation Oaks
Apartments
East
General Commercial GC General Commercial Hotel, fueling station
West
General Commercial GC General Commercial Sam’s Club
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1958
Zoning: 1980 - Zoned A-O Agricultural-Open at the time of annexation.
1983 – Rezoned to CI Commercial Industrial
Final Plat: 1984 - Harvey Road East
1989 – Harvey Road East Amending Plat
1996 - Harvey Road East Replat
Site development: Primary structure built in 1983. Currently used as Lock ‘n’ Roll, a self-
storage company.
Existing: CI Commercial Industrial
Proposed: GC General Commercial
A
S
S
O
CIA
T
E
S
A
V
TA
R
A
C
T WOOD CLIFF CTSPICEWOODCT
UNIVERSITY OAKSBLCLEARWOOD CTSANDELWOOD CTWI
N
D
W
O
O
D
D
R
E
A
R
L
R
U
DD
E
R
FW
S
UNIVERSITYOAKSBLHARVEYRDWINGATE CRMAGNOLIADRWOOD CLIFF CTDOMINIK DRSPICEWOODCTCLEARWOOD CTW
I
N
D
W
O
O
D
D
RSANDELWOOD CTOFFRAMPEARLRUDDERFWSON
R
A
MP
E
A
R
L
R
U
D
D
E
R
F
WS
A
S
S
O
CIA
T
E
S
A
V
July 6, 2017
Regular Agenda
Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Young Tract & Clarke Tract
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Economic Development Manager
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use & Character Map from
General Suburban and Business Park to General Commercial for approximately 100 acres
located along the east side of State Highway 6, south of The Business Park at College Station
and north of the Texas World Speedway property. Case #CPA2017-000008 and Case
#CPA2017-000009 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the July 27th City
Council Meeting- Subject to change.)
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use and Character Map.
Summary: The proposed City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character
Map amendment from General Suburban to General Commercial is for approximately 100 acres
located along the east side of State Highway 6 South. As growth and development moves
further south, single-family homes are not appropriate adjacent to a freeway. The Natural Areas
in the area of the floodplain will remain designated as it is today.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Changed or changing conditions in the subject area or the City: The City of
College Station’s Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2009. This site was designated
as General Suburban on the Future Land Use and Character Map.
A portion of the area is identified on the Comprehensive Plan Concept Map as a part of
“Growth Area I.” According to the Comprehensive Plan, “Growth areas exhibit
opportunities for new development. In general, these areas are greenfields, located
beyond the influence area of existing neighborhoods and not intended to be within a
district or corridor. These areas will be the most market responsive areas; that is, they
will offer the greatest level of land use flexibility. This flexibility will be accompanied by
proscriptive land use and design guidance that will ensure the resulting development
furthers the City’s overall goals and objectives.”
The Comprehensive Plan states that this area “consists of land adjacent to State
Highway 6 bounded by the Speedway District to the south, the Pebble Creek area to
the north and the Lick Creek Corridor to the east. This area should exhibit a suburban
character overall. The streams, related riparian areas and floodplains shall be left intact
and undisturbed except where utility placements, recreation facilities, or street
crossings are necessary.”
City Staff has recently begun to identify and actively market developable commercial
properties along key corridors in an effort to attract businesses to the community.
Limited developable commercial properties of significant scale exist along Earl Rudder
Freeway, the City’s primary commercial corridor. The subject property is one of the
areas that City staff identified as an opportunity for future commercial development
along the Freeway.
2. Scope of the request: Staff proposes to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use and Character Map for an area that is approximately 100 acres from General
Suburban to General Commercial. The Natural Areas designation shown in the middle
of the property will remain. The intent of the amendment is to permit and encourage
future general commercial development along State Highway 6 South.
3. Availability of adequate information: The General Commercial designation allows for
future development of general commercial uses such as retail and restaurant uses. The
property has over 5,500 feet of frontage along Earl Rudder Freeway.
4. Consistency with the goals and strategies set forth in the Plan: The proposal is
consistent with the goals and strategies of the Comprehensive Plan. The goal for
College Station’s Future Land Use and Character is to create a community with strong,
unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a
protected and enhanced natural environment.
City staff has identified the undeveloped frontage as a future commercial development
opportunity along Earl Rudder Freeway, the City’s primary commercial corridor. The
portion of the property proposed for General Commercial use is located furthest from
the existing residential uses.
The City adopted the Economic Development Master Plan in 2012, with an over-arching
goal of a diversified economy generating quality, stable, full-time jobs; bolstering the
sales and property tax base; and contributing to a high quality of life. One of the
strategic initiatives for continued economic success is to support retail development by
ensuring that there are opportunities to locate and expand businesses that make
College Station a regional destination for retail services. The stated Master Plan goal
for retail is as follows: “The City of College Station will continue to recognize the
significance of retail expenditures to the local economy and will ensure that locations
are ready to accommodate the development of such opportunities and that the City
remains responsive to an ever-changing market.”
5. Consideration of the Future Land Use & Character and/or Thoroughfare Plans:
The subject property is currently designated as General Suburban on the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The proposed amendment
is to General Commercial.
The current land use of General Suburban is intended for high density single-family
use. The proposed land use of General Commercial is intended for concentrations of
commercial activities that cater both to nearby residents and to the larger community or
region. Generally, these areas tend to be large in size and located near the intersection
of two regionally significant roads (arterials and freeways).
Earl Rudder Freeway South is designated as a Highway/Freeway on the City’s
Thoroughfare Plan. Given its location, the subject property is suitable for a General
Commercial land use designation.
A portion of the area is identified on the Comprehensive Plan Concept Map as a part of
“Growth Area I.” Growth areas exhibit opportunities for new development. In general,
these areas are greenfields, located beyond the influence area of existing
neighborhoods and not intended to be within a district or corridor. These areas will be
the most market responsive areas; that is, they will offer the greatest level of land use
flexibility. This flexibility will be accompanied by proscriptive land use and design
guidance that will ensure the resulting development furthers the City’s overall goals and
objectives.
6. Compatibility with the surrounding area: The proposed amendment to General
Commercial would allow for the property to be zoned in the future for commercial uses
that serve the general community and region. The surrounding area is largely
undeveloped.
7. Impacts on infrastructure including water, wastewater, drainage, and the
transportation network: Water service is available to this area from existing 8-inch
and 18-inch waterlines along State Highway 6 South and Lakeway Drive,
respectively. There is an existing 15-inch sewer main through the area that may serve
this property. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site development
shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Existing infrastructure appears to be adequate for the proposed future
general commercial use at this time.
The subject property has frontage on Earl Rudder Freeway South, a
Freeway/Expressway and the extension of Lakeway Drive, a two-lane Major Collector
on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. An unnamed Minor Arterial is projected to cross this
area at the overpass at State Highway 6 South and an additional unnamed minor
collector is shown on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. Access to the area will be from Earl
Rudder Freeway South, Lakeway Drive, and future thoroughfares.
8. Impact on the City’s ability to provide, fund, and maintain services: The proposed
amendment for the subject property does not negatively impact the City’s ability to
provide, fund, and maintain services.
9. Impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas: The proposed amendment
for the area does not negatively impact natural areas nor prevent the preservation of
such areas.
10. Contribution to the overall direction and character of the community as captured
in the Plan’s vision and goals: The goal for College Station’s Future Land Use and
Character is to create a community with strong, unique neighborhoods, protected rural
areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a protected and enhanced natural
environment. The proposed amendment to General Commercial does not limit the goals
of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment proposes future uses consistent with
properties fronting a regionally significant freeway.
Supporting Materials
1. Background Information
2. Aerial
3. Land Use Comparison
Background
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: July 20, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Date: July 27, 2017
Contacts in support: None at the time of staff report.
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of staff report.
Inquiry contacts: None at the time of staff report.
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Business Park M-1 Planned Industrial
College Station
Business Center
South
General Suburban R Rural Texas World
Speedway, auto sales,
distribution
East
General Suburban R Rural Undeveloped
West
(Across Earl
Rudder Freeway)
Restricted Suburban
and Rural
GS General Suburban,
R Rural, PDD Planned
Development District for
housing
Single-family housing
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1994 & 1996
Zoning: 1994 & 1996 – A-O Agricultural-Open upon annexation
2007 – Approximately 16 acres rezoned to CI Commercial Industrial
2013 – A-O renamed R Rural
Final Plat: The majority of the properties are currently unplatted, with the exception of
Animate Habitat Phase 1, platted in 2007 for the development of A&M
Super Storage.
Site development: The majority of the subject properties, as well as the surrounding area, are
currently undeveloped, with the exception of A&M Super Storage on
approximately five acres.
View.ashx %d×%d pixels
https://collegestation.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=5311107&GUID=63DF73DB-B7E9-4041-AB3C-82B84564AEA2[7/13/2017 4:27:24 PM]