HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/15/2017 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionPlanning and Zoning Commission Workshop
College Station, TX
Meeting Agenda - Final
City Hall
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, TX 77840
The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning
Commission Workshop Meeting.
City Hall Council Chambers6:00 PMThursday, June 15, 2017
1. Call the meeting to order.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
Discussion of Minor & Amending Plats approved by Staff.
*Final Plat ~ Tower Point Subdivision Phase 8B, Block 3, Lots 17A
and 17B ~ Case #FPCO2017-000002 (Lazo)
17-02864.
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the
consideration of the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached)
17-02965.
Sponsors:Bombek
2017 Plan of WorkAttachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a quarterly
update on economic development efforts.
17-02956.
Sponsors:Ruiz
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update
on the proposed Bryan /College Station Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) 2050 Major Thoroughfare Concept Map and
the College Station Thoroughfare Plan.
17-02917.
Sponsors:Schubert
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z
Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
*Monday, June 19, 2017 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council
Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison -
Oldham)
*Thursday, July 6, 2017 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~
Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m.
17-02838.
9. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design
Review Board, BioCorridor Board.
10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning
Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 6/8/2017
June 15, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Workshop
Meeting Agenda - Final
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement
of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting.
11. Adjourn.
The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on
this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion .
An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion.
APPROVED
_____________________
City Manager
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101
Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on June 9, 2017 at 5:00 p.m.
_____________________
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this
meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as
interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary ’s Office at
(979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989 , or email adaassistance@cstx .gov at least
two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made .
If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting,
the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried
Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an
Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con
Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de
mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H,
Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben
entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 6/8/2017
Page 1 of 5
2017 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work
Comprehensive Plan Items
Implementation of Adopted Plans
Summary:
Implementation of adopted master plans
and neighborhood, district, and corridor
plans, namely: Central College Station,
Eastgate, Southside Area, Wellborn
Community, and South Knoll Area
neighborhood plans, and Bicycle,
Pedestrian & Greenways, Parks and
Recreation, Water, Waste Water, Medical
District, and Economic Development master
plans.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion:
Thoroughfare Plan Update
Summary: Project Dates:
The Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) is in the process of updating its
Concept Map for the BCS region. Once
adopted by the MPO, the city is anticipating
taking action to amend the Thoroughfare
Plan to align with the changes in the MPO’s
regional Concept Map.
06/15/17: Provide an update on the BCS
Thoroughfare Concept Map as adopted
by the MPO and provide information on
the City’s next steps to amend the
current Thoroughfare Master Plan.
Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (JS)
Staff Assigned: Jason Schubert Anticipated Completion: 06/15/17
Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan Update
Summary:
Bring additional updates to the Planning and
Zoning Commission as the Master Plan update
moves forward.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Venessa Garza, P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion:
Page 2 of 5
Neighborhood Integrity Items
*Traffic Calming Toolkit
Summary:
Receive information regarding the current
traffic calming policy and devices (speed
pillows, etc.), and including updates as
recommended by the Council
Transportation and Mobility
Committee. Additionally receive update on
the implementation of the neighborhood
parking toolbox created by the
Neighborhood Transportation Task Force.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned:
Troy Rother & Jason Schubert
Anticipated Completion:
Student Housing in Established Single-Family Neighborhoods
Summary:
Research best practices from peer university
communities regarding the management of
student housing in single-family neighborhoods.
Explore the possibility of expanding options for
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO),
mitigate the impacts to on-street parking and
drainage and provide educational opportunities for
Homeowner’s Associations and Neighborhood
Associations
Project Dates:
4/20/17: Follow up discussion regarding the
presentation on student housing in established
single-family neighborhoods.
Staff Assigned: Anticipated Completion:
Page 3 of 5
UDO Regulatory Items
Evaluation of UDO Regulations
Summary: Project Dates:
Review UDO requirements that add
minimal value as identified by staff and
consider opportunities to reduce
regulations and streamline processes.
06/01/17 Presentation of staff's initial list of
identified opportunities to reduce regulations and
streamline processes.
Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Initiation: 06/01/2017
Sign Ordinance Revisions
Summary:
Review and update the City’s sign
ordinance in light of the recent Supreme
Court decision regarding sign regulations
based upon content.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned:
Molly Hitchcock, Rachel Lazo & Legal
Anticipated Completion:
Update on Off-Street Parking Requirements
Summary:
Provide options to allow flexibility to off -
street parking requirements. Receive
direction on future UDO text amendments.
Project Dates:
5/4/17: Additional presentation and
discussion on potential amendments or
additions to the City’s current off-street
parking requirements.
Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Completion:
Suburban Commercial Land Use and Zoning
Summary:
Under City Council direction, review current
Comprehensive Plan land use description and
zoning ordinance requirements of the Suburban
Commercial zoning district and provide options for
future text amendments.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Anticipated Completion:
Bicycle Rack Standards
Summary:
Under City Council direction, review current non-
residential parking requirements for providing on-
site bicycle parking facilities.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Anticipated Completion:
Page 4 of 5
Non-Residential Landscaping Requirements
Summary:
Review current city landscaping requirements
(including streetscaping and buffer standards) and
the water usage needed to maintain current
landscaping requirements. Explore options for
water-conserving landscaping.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Anticipated Completion:
On-Going Items
Economic Development Updates
Summary:
Receive regular updates from the Economic
Development Department regarding the
vision and implementation of the
commercialization of TAMU research-
related output, including examples of
successful efforts elsewhere. Additionally,
receive an update on the recent
announcement regarding plans for the
TAMU System Rellis Campus revitalization
effort.
Project Dates:
06/15/17: Provide a quarterly update on
Economic Development efforts and
land availability for commercial uses.
Presentation at P&Z Workshop. (NR)
Staff Assigned: Economic Development Anticipated Completion: On-Going
Semi-Annual Review of Pre-Application Conference Surveys
Summary:
Provide an update on the survey results from the
Pre-Application Conference process.
Project Dates:
3/16/17: Provide an update on the status of the
PAC meeting process and implementation of the
PAC survey. Presentation at P&Z Workshop.
(MB)
Staff Assigned: Mark Bombek Anticipated Completion: On-Going
Page 5 of 5
Educational/informational Items
Parkland Dedication
Summary:
Review of parkland dedication requirements and
available resources.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Anticipated Completion:
Sidewalk Fee-in-Lieu
Summary:
Review of sidewalk fund requirements and
available resources.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Anticipated Completion:
Block Length and Block Perimeter
Summary:
Review of current requirements regarding block
length and block perimeter.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai & Jason
Schubert
Anticipated Completion:
Public Hearing Notifications
Summary:
Review current community notification
requirements and practices for cases involving a
public hearing.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Anticipated Completion:
Mueller Report Update
Summary:
Update on the implementation of the 2013
Organizational Review of P&DS (AKA “Mueller
Report”)
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Lance Simms Anticipated Completion:
Review of Development Fees
Summary:
Evaluation of the effect of development fees on
the price of single family housing to the
homeowner and an overview of the financial
context of development fees for the City.
Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: Justin Golbabai Anticipated Completion:
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
College Station, TX
Meeting Agenda - Final
City Hall
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, TX 77840
The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning
Commission Regular Meeting.
City Hall Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, June 15, 2017
1. Call meeting to order.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Hear Citizens.
At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the
Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen
presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who
wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the
agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into
the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is
made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.)
All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans
and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision
regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff
recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any
Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to
the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
4. Consent Agenda
Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence
Requests from meetings.
*Bill Mather ~ June 15, 2017
17-02644.1
Bill MatherAttachments:
Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting
minutes.
*June 1, 2017 ~ Workshop
*June 1, 2017 ~ Regular
17-02844.2
June 1 2017 Workshop
June 1 2017 Regular
Attachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat 17-02904.3
Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 6/9/2017
June 15, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
for the Creek Meadows Subdivision Section 6 Phase 3, consisting
of 28 lots and common area on approximately 6.5 acres, generally
located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Creek
Meadows Boulevard South and Greens Prairie Trail. Case #
FP2016-000032
Sponsors:Lazo
Staff Report
Application
Final Plat
Attachments:
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding waiver
requests to Unified Development Section 12-8.3.G ‘Blocks' and
12-8.3.H.4.f.2 'Common Open Space Requirements for Cluster
Developments’ and a presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding a Preliminary Plan for Williams Creek Lake Estates
consisting of 97 residential lots on approximately 74.47 acres
generally located at the intersection of Rock Prairie Road and
Williams Lake Drive. Case #PP2017-000005
17-02896.
Sponsors:Paz
Staff Report
Application
Preliminary Plan
Attachments:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a waiver
request to Unified Development Section 12-8.3.k ‘Sidewalks’ and a
public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding a Final Plat for Holik's Restricted Homesites Lot 1R,
Block 1, including a replat of Holik's Restricted Homesites Lot 1,
Block 1, consisting of 1 residential lot on approximately 0.48 acres
located at 200 Timber, generally located at the intersection of
Timber St and Anna St. Case # FP2017-000005
17-02827.
Sponsors:Lazo
Staff Report
Final Plat
Application
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified
17-02798.
Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 6/9/2017
June 15, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from MF Multi-Family and
GC General Commercial to MF Multi-Family and GC General
Commercial for approximately 17.78 acres generally located at the
northeast corner of the intersection of Turkey Creek Road and
Raymond Stotzer Frontage Road. Case #REZ2017-000012 (Note:
Final action on this item is scheduled for the July 13, 2017 City
Council Meeting - subject to change)
Sponsors:Bombek
Staff Report
Background
Aerial and Small Area Map
Application
Rezoning Map
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified
Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned
Development District to PDD Planned Development District and
amending the Concept Plan for approximately 2 acres being
Harper's Crossing Block 1, Lot 2 of the Official Records of Brazos
County, Texas, located at 2849 Barron Road. Case
#REZ2017-000006 (Final action on this item is scheduled for the
June 19, 2017 City Council Meeting- subject to change)
17-02819.
Sponsors:Paz
Coversheet
Background Info
SAM & Aerial
Application
Concept Plan
Concept Plan Notes
Attachments:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified
Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to RS
Restricted Suburban and GS General Suburban for approximately
2.43 acres being Pebble Creek Phase 2C, Block 20 and Block 21,
17-028010.
Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 6/9/2017
June 15, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, located at 5101 &
5201 Pebble Creek Parkway, more generally located at the
intersection of Pebble Creek Parkway and Champions Boulevard.
Case #REZ2017-000011 (Final action on this item is scheduled for
the July 13, 2017 City Council meeting- subject to change)
Sponsors:Paz
Coversheet
Background Info
SAM & Aerial
Application
Rezoning Map
Letter from Pebble Creek Owners Association
Attachments:
11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement
of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting.
12. Adjourn
The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on
this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion.
APPROVED
_____________________
City Manager
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101
Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on June 9, 2017 at 5:00 p.m.
_____________________
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this
meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as
interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at
(979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least
two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made.
If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting,
the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations.
Page 4 College Station, TX Printed on 6/9/2017
June 15, 2017Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
Meeting Agenda - Final
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried
Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an
Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con
Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de
mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H,
Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben
entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 5 College Station, TX Printed on 6/9/2017
Absence Request Form
For Elected and Appointed Officers
Name William R. Mather
Request Submitted on May 23, 2017
I will not be in attendance at the meeting on June 15, 2017
for the reason specified: (Date)
Out of Town – Family Vacation
Signature
June 1, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Workshop Meeting
June 1, 2017 6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Johnny Burns, Bill Mather, Elianor Vessali, Jeremy Osborne
and Keith Williamson
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Linda Harvell
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Justin Golbabai, Mark Bombek,
Jenifer Paz, Madison Thomas, Erika Bridges, Tim Horn, Jason Schubert, Adam Falco, Eric Chafin and
Kristen Hejny
1. Call the meeting to order.
Chairperson Kee Called the meeting to order at 6:06 p.m.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
There was no discussion.
3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
4. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff.
*Final Plat ~ Minor Plat ~ Crescent Point Phase 2 Block 1 Lot 6R-1 ~ Case #FPCO2017-000003
(Thomas)
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the consideration of the Draft 2017 P&Z Plan
of Work.
Senior Planner Bombek presented updates on this item to the Commission. Mr. Bombek stated that
staff used suggestions from Commission and Council to add to the 2017 Plan of Work. Mr. Bombek
stated that items related to the traffic calming toolkit, single-family housing prices, and Non-
Residential Architectural landscaping requirements were some of the items added to the list.
Commissioner Williamson motioned to adopt the 2017 Plan of Work as presented by staff.
Commissioner Burns seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0).
June 1, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an evaluation of UDO regulations as a part of
the 2017 P&Z Plan of Work.
Planning Administrator Golbabai presented the UDO Evaluation and staff’s recommendations to the
Commission.
Chairperson Kee asked for clarification on the proposed changes to the preliminary plan process.
Director Simms stated that while the required information may be reduced, staff will still require
enough detail to show that UDO requirements are met.
Commissioner Mather arrived at 6:16 p.m.
Commissioner Mather asked staff to remove duplications between preliminary plan and final plat
submittal requirements. Mr. Mather also stated that previously approved waivers that were expanded
or modified with the resubmittal of a preliminary plan should require a new waiver request.
Commission approved staff’s moving forward with recommended changes to the UDO and also
recommended moving away from an approved color pallet.
7. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
*Thursday, June 8, 2017 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and
Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison – Vessali)
*Thursday, June 15, 2017 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular
7:00 p.m.
*Monday, June 19, 2017 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and
Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison – Oldham)
8. Discussion, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items:
*A Rezoning for approximately three acres located at 3500 Harvey Road from R Rural to GC General
Commercial & NAP Natural Areas Protected. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on
May 18, 2017, and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on May 25,
2017, and voted (6-1) to approve the request.
*A Rezoning for approximately 367 acres located on Greens Prairie Road West from R Rural to RS
Restricted Suburban. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 18, 2017, and voted
(7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on May 25, 2017, and voted (7-0) to
approve the request.
9. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Bio
Corridor Board.
There was no discussion.
10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire
about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the
June 1, 2017 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the
subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There were no items.
10. Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:57 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
______________________________ ________________________________
Jane Kee, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin. Support Specialist
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
June 1, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
May 18, 2017, 7:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Johnny Burns, Bill Mather, Elianor Vessali, Jeremy Osborne
and Keith Williamson
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Linda Harvell
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Justin Golbabai, Mark Bombek,
Jenifer Paz, Madison Thomas, Erika Bridges, Tim Horn, Jason Schubert, Adam Falco, Eric Chafin and
Kristen Hejny
1. Call Meeting to Order
Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Hear Citizens
4. Consent Agenda
4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes.
*May 18, 2017 ~ Workshop
*May 18, 2017 ~ Regular
4.2 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for the Meadows Phase 1,
consisting of 30 lots on approximately 67 acres located at 19626 State Highway 6 South, generally
located one mile east of Indian Lakes Subdivision, approximately one mile north of FM 159 in the
College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case #FP2016-000013
Commissioner Mather motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Osborne
seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by
Commission Action.
No items were removed.
6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Wellborn
SUD Subdivision Lot 1R, Block 1 including a replat of Lot 9A and 4A of the Benjamin Graham
June 1, 2017 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 2
Subdivision consisting of 1 lot on approximately 3.0 acres located at 4118 Greens Prairie Road
West, generally located at the northeast corner of the inter section of Greens Prairie Road West and
Live Oak Street. Case #FPCO2017-000001.
Senior Planner Paz presented this Final Plat to the Commission, and recommended approval.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
No one spoke.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Osborne motioned to approve the Final Plat. Commissioner Mather seconded
the motion, the motion passed (6-0).
7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire
about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or
the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to
place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion.
8. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 7:07 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
______________________________ ________________________________
Jane Kee, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Planning & Zoning Commission
June 15, 2017
Page 1 of 3
FINAL PLAT
for
Creek Meadows Subdivision Section 6 Phase 3
FP2016-000032
SCALE: 28 lots and common area on approximately 6.5 acres
LOCATION: Generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of
Creek Meadows Boulevard South and Greens Prairie Trail
ZONING: PDD Planned Development District
APPLICANT: Rabon Metcalf, RME Consulting Engineers
PROPERTY OWNER: Creek Meadows Partners, LP (c/o Chris Rhodes)
PROJECT MANAGER: Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner
rlazo@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning & Zoning Commission
June 15, 2017
Page 2 of 3
Planning & Zoning Commission
June 15, 2017
Page 3 of 3
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: March 2008
Zoning: PDD Planned Development District
Preliminary Plan: Master Plan approved in 2006. Subsequent Preliminary Plans
have been revised in January 2008, September 2008, November
2008, January 2009, November 2014, and March 2015.
Site Development: Vacant
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ETJ prior
to parkland dedication requirements being applicable in the ETJ.
Therefore, no parkland dedication is proposed or required.
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ETJ.
Therefore, no sidewalks are required; however, they have been
provided throughout the Creek Meadows development.
Bicycle Connectivity: This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ETJ.
Therefore, no bicycle connectivity is proposed or required.
Impact Fees: N/A
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The
Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Restricted Suburban. The plat is in
compliance with the adopted PDD dimensional standards for single family residential lots.
This subdivision phase does not include a thoroughfare on the Thoroughfare Plan, but
provides for two residential cul-de-sacs that will provide street access to the residential
lots. The cul-de-sacs will have access to Cottonwood Creek Lane (Minor Collector on the
Thoroughfare Plan).
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The Final Plat complies with the applicable
Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 7
June 15, 2017
PRELIMINARY PLAN
for
William Creek Lake Estates
PP2017-000005
SCALE: 97 lots on approximately 74.5 acres
LOCATION: Generally located at the intersection of Rock Prairie Road and
Williams Lake Drive
ZONING: E Estate & RS Restricted Suburban
APPLICANT: Schultz Engineering, LLC
PROJECT MANAGER: Jenifer Paz, AICP Senior Planner
jpaz@cstx.gov
PROJECT OVERVIEW: Revisions to the original Preliminary Plan include additional
property recently rezoned to RS Restricted Suburban along Rock
Prairie Road. The previously approved plan discretionary items
for UDO Section 12-8.3.E.4 ‘Adequate Street Access’ and UDO
Section 12-8.3.H.1.i ‘General Requirements’ will carry with this
plan given that changes do not affect the previously approved
discretionary items.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the waiver requests to UDO
Section 12-8.3.G. ‘Blocks’ and UDO Section 12-8.3.H.4.f.2
‘Common Open Space Requirements for Cluster Developments’.
If the waivers are approved by the Commission, the Preliminary
Plan must be approved. If any of the waivers are denied the
Preliminary Plan must also be denied.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 7
June 15, 2017
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 7
June 15, 2017
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 7
June 15, 2017
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1983 (Rock Prairie Road frontage), 2002 (remainder of tract)
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (upon annexation)
A-O Agricultural Open renamed R Rural (2013)
R Rural to E Estate (2014)
E Estate to RS Restricted Suburban approx. 14 acres (2016)
Site development: Primarily vacant with a cell tower and an existing manmade
pond. Phase 1 of Williams Creek Lake Estate is near
completion.
Preliminary Plan: 2014 & 2016 (revised)
Final Plat: Phase 1 (2015)
COMMENTS
Water: Each lot is required to have public water service, as shown on
the plat. The majority of the lots in this subdivision are in the
Wellborn Special Utility District CCN. Water service will be
provided by a Wellborn water line. Lots in College Station
Utilities CCN will be served by extending the water main on
Rock Prairie Road through the subdivision. Public waterlines
will be required to comply with the B/CS Unified Design
Guidelines with the Final Plat.
Sewer: The subject tract will be served by College Station Utilities for
sanitary sewer. There is an existing 12-inch main on William D.
Fitch Parkway which will provide service to the site. Public
sanitary sewer lines will be required to be extended to all lots in
accordance with B/CS Unified Design Guidelines with the Final
Plat.
Off-site Easements: There is an existing 50-foot Public Utility and Emergency Road
Easement and 30-foot Private Access Easement required for
the development of the subdivision.
Drainage: The subject tract is located in Carters Creek and Lick Creek
Drainage basins. On-site storm water detention facilities are
proposed with this development. The proposed development
will be required to comply with the B/CS Unified Design
Guidelines.
Flood Plain: The subject tract is not located within a FEMA regulated
Special Flood Hazard Area.
Greenways: None are provided or required.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 7
June 15, 2017
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks are not required within portions of the development
as the streets are being constructed to rural sections.
Sidewalks are required along Rock Prairie Road and on both
side of the street for Phases 3 & 2C.
Bicycle Connectivity: Rock Prairie Road is anticipated to have bike lanes when it is
widened in the future.
Streets: A portion of the two-lane Minor Collector, Williams Lake
Drive, will be constructed with the platting of Phase 4.
Oversize Request: Sanitary Sewer Oversize Participation was discussed but is not
warranted.
Parkland Dedication Fees: Parkland Dedication fees totaling $1,261 per lot will be required
at the filing of the Final Plat.
Impact Fees: N/A
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The
proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Unified
Development Ordinance, with the exemptions noted below.
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Preliminary Plan is in
compliance with the Subdivision Regulations contained in the UDO except for the following
waiver requests:
Waiver Requests:
• UDO Section 12-8.3.G ‘Blocks’ – In order to provide a public street network
that is complimentary to the Thoroughfare Plan and ensure uniform access and
circulation to areas intended for similar land use context, block length in
Restricted Suburban may not exceed 1,200 feet. Madden Circle proposed in
Phase 3 exceeds the block length by 210 feet.
• UDO Section 12-8.3.H.4.f.2 ‘Common Open Space Requirements for
Cluster Developments’ – The purpose of this section is to retain the natural
and rural character of the surrounding area as outlined in the Comprehensive
Plan. The waiver is to reduce the amount of common open space required for
the clustered Estate portion of the subdivision. The clustered portion is required
to provide 24.11 acres of open space but only proposing 16.456 acres.
In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the
Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the
waiver:
1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land
involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will
deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land;
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 of 7
June 15, 2017
The applicant stated it is their desire for Phase 3 to be gated with a private street.
Additionally, the previously approved Preliminary Plan showed Madden Circle as a
cul-de-sac that did not project to the adjacent property.
Requiring additional open space would result in a reduction in the number of lots.
The applicant stated that the proposed Estate subdivision as designed provides
greater than 25% of the land as open space to be used by residents and is a
significant amount for 59 residences. The proposed open space still meets the intent
of low-density residential. It should be noted that the Commission previously
approved the required amount of open space. Due to changes in the Preliminary
Plan, the waiver must be heard and considered by the Commission.
2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
a substantial property right of the applicant.
Per the subdivision regulations, streets required to meet block length cannot be
private or gated. The applicant stated that in order for Phase 3 to be a gated section
with a private street (Madden Circle), the block length wavier is necessary.
It is the property owners’ desire to develop the property as a rural residential
subdivision with sanitary sewer service. Without the wavier to open space, the
number of lots that can be developed to meet the requirements is not sufficient to
justify the expense of extending sanitary sewer service to the subdivision.
3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City
in administering this chapter; and
Madden Circle is proposed to be a private, gated street which will be maintained by
the 20 property owners of Phase 3. The waiver requested is less than 18% of the
required block length required, for a total block length of 1,410 feet. Additionally,
Phase 1 of this development is providing access to the adjacent tract from Robcon
Way. This request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or
injurious to other property.
The applicant states that in granting the waiver to open space all lots will still exceed
the minimum lot size required for a rural subdivision and it will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property.
4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the
orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the
provisions of this chapter.
In order to break the block, a street would likely be extended from Madden Circle
to Robcon Way, which will require the street to be public. The applicant states that
this waiver will not affect the subdivision of other land since the proposed plan
provides the extension of streets and utilities to adjacent tracts.
Orderly subdivision of other land will not be affected if the waiver to open space is
granted. The open space provided will only serve this subdivision.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the waiver requests to UDO Section 12-8.3.G. ‘Blocks’ and UDO
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 7 of 7
June 15, 2017
Section 12-8.3.H.4.f.2 ‘Common Open Space Requirements for Cluster Developments’. If the
waivers are approved by the Commission, the Preliminary Plan should be approved. If any of the
waivers are denied the Preliminary Plan should also be denied.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Preliminary Plan
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home ofTexaeA6~M Univcrsity
CASE NO.:________________
DATE SUBMITTED:_______________
TIME:
STAFF:
PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference n/a
NAME OF PROJECT Williams Creek Lake Estates
ADDRESS 2242 Carl?Ln College Station,Tx 77845
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION:
1200’Northwest of the intersection of William D Fitch Parkway and Rock Prairie Road East
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Joe Johnson E-mail joejohnson1889@hotmail.com
Street Address P.O.Box 800
City Colemon
Phone Number 9792290310
State TX Zip Code 76834
Fax Number 325-3574414
PROPERTY OWNER’S INFORMATION (ALL.owners must be identified.Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Williams Creek Lake Estates,Inc.E-mail foejohnson1889@hotmail.com
Street Address P.O.Box 800
City Colemon
Phone Number 9792290310
ARCHITECTOR ENGINEER’S INFORMATION:
Name Joe Schultz P.E.
State TX Zip Code 76834
______Fax Number 325-357-4414
E-mail eng~schuItzeng.com
Street Address 911 Southwest Parkway E.
City College Station
Phone Number 979-764-3900
State TX Zip Code 77840
Fax Number 979-764-3910
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
~$932 Preliminary Plan Application Fee.
~$233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
~Copy of plan.A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval.
~Title report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90)days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens,
encumbrances,etc.
~Impact study (if oversized participation is requested).
~The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are
not.
Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 6
Total Acreage 74.470 Total No.of Lots 97 R-O-W Acreage 13.533
Number of Lots By Zoning District E I 59 RS I 38 I
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District
E ,,0.577 RS ,,0.242 ______/__________________
Floodplain Acreage N/A
NOTE:Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be
considered complete.
Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land? No
Are you proposing to fl develop the park ~dedicate the development fee?(Check one)
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
~Yes
flNo
If yes,provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:WILLIAMS CREEK LAKE ESTATES
City Project Number (if known):#PP2016-000005
Date!Timeframe when submitted:March 2016
Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
waiver to section 12-83,H,4,f,2 -Common Open Space Requirement for Cluster Developments.The requested
waiver is to provide less than minimum open space requirement for the estate zoned portion of the subdivision.
Waiver to Section 12-8.3.G.Blocks.2.Block Length
Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 6
Regarding the waiver request,explain how:
1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or injurious to other
property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4 The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1.fl An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way:
2.E1 The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative,or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City’s comprehensive Plan;
3.~A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk.Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12)months;
4.~Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate I
rural context;
5.fl When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle,Pedestrian,and
Greenways Master Plan;
see attached sheet
see attached sheet
Revised 5/15 Page 3 of6
6.jJ The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or
7.fl The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification,in the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NOTE:A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true,correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE
OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from
the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If
the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s
representative to sign the application on its behalf.LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also
considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above.
Signd~tur,~nd title Date
Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 6
PRELIMINARY PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
3”xlO”blank area in the bottom right corner on each page of your drawings for City of College Stations
arrival stamps..
~Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits.No scale required but include north arrow.
Title Block with the following information:
Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner,engineer and surveyor.
~Proposed name of subdivision (subdivision name &street names will be approved
through Brazos County 911).
~Date of preparation (including the date the plat was submitted and the dates of any
revisions on the plat).
~Engineer’s scale in feet.
~Total area intended to be developed.
~North Arrow.
~Location of current city limit lines and current zoning district boundary. The appropriate zoning district(s)
must be in place for the proposed land uses before the application for a subdivision.
Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.Boundary must include all of parent tract.
~Descriptions by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within accepted land survey
standards.(Labeled on boundary lines,not separate metes and bounds description.)
~j Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control point,to which ,later,all dimensions,
angles,bearings,block numbers,and similar data shaTl be referred.The plat shall be located with
respect to a corner of the survey or tract,or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part.
~Name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous parcels of unsubdivided land,and
an indication whether or not contiguous properties are platted.
~Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and Floodway,if applicable,according to the most recent available
data.
~Topographic information,including contours at two foot (2 ft.)intervals,wooded areas,and flowline
elevation of streams.
~Proposed land uses (in compliance with existing zoning district).
~The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii,area,
center angle,degree of curvature,tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following:
(Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with
the subdivision,as well as,those within the subdivision).
CITY OF COlLEGE STATION
Home ofTexasA~M Universiry~
Revised 9/16 Page 1 of2
Existing Proposed
~Streets.Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp.turn
around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
~1 Public and private ROW.locations and widths.(All existing and proposed R.O.W.’s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance.
Alleys.
Well site locations.
~Pipelines.If carrying flammable gas or fuel,also show size of line,design pressure and product
transported through the line.
~Utility services (water &sanitary sewer).All existing and proposed utilities of sufficient
size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.
~Easements.
~Drainage structures and improvements including underground storm sewer and all overland
systems (flow line of existing watercourses)and showing where these will discharge. Proposed
channel cross sections,if any.
~A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially).
Parkiand dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages.All proposed dedications must be reviewed
by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation
provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration.
El Greenways dedication.
Public areas.
Other public improvements,including but not limited to parks,schools and other public
facilities.
Proposed phasing.Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements and
infrastructure costs shown to be distributed evenly throughout the subdivision.Phases must be final
platted in sequential order as shown or defined on the preliminary plan.
Are there impact fees associated with this development?El Yes ~No
Revised 9/16 Page 2 of 2
Williams Creek Lake Estates
Waiver Request
Waiver to Section 12-8.3, H, 4, f, 2, Common Open Space Requirement for Cluster
Developments
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict
application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use
of his land.
Strict application of the ordinance will result in a reduction in the number of lots. The
proposed estate subdivision as designed provides greater than 25% of the land as open
space for use by the residents. This open space is 61% of the open space area required.
The 16+ acres of open space has 3 ponds, wooded areas and open areas that can be
used for recreational activities. This is a significant amount of land for 59 residences.
The Developer feels that the proposed estate subdivision plan meets the intent of a low-
density residential subdivision.
2. The wavier is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right
of the applicant.
The property owner desires to develop the property as a rural residential subdivision
with sanitary sewer service. Without the waiver, the number of lots that can be
developed to meet the requirements is not sufficient to justify the expense of extending
sanitary sewer service to the subdivision. Providing sanitary sewer service to the
residents benefits them and the City compared the use of on-site sewage systems and
also the City will receive revenue from the sewer service.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision
regulations.
Even with the granting of the waiver, all of the lots exceed the minimum lot size
required for a rural subdivision with sanitary sewer service so this development will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision
of other land in the area in accordance with the previsions of the Unified Development
Ordinance.
The granting of this waiver will not affect the subdivision of other land since the
proposed plan provides the extension of streets and utilities to the adjacent tracts.
Waiver to Section 12-8.3.G. Blocks. 2. Block Length
The requested waiver is for block length for Madden Circle which is 1,410 feet in length which
exceeds the maximum block length of 1,200’.
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict
application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use
of his land.
The developer desires that Phase 3 of this development be gated with private streets.
The previously approved Preliminary Plan included a cul-de-sac where Madden Circle
is located which did not project to the adjacent property. The adjacent tract has access
to Rock Prairie Road and Robcon Way which is adequate for the future development of
the tract.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right
of the applicant.
In order for Phase 3 to be a gated section with private streets the waiver is necessary.
Without the waiver, the developer cannot develop the land as proposed.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision
regulations.
Granting of this waiver does not affect the public health, safety, or welfare nor is it
injurious to the adjacent property since Phase 1 of this development provided access to
the adjacent tract to Robcon Way.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision
of other land in the area in accordance with the previsions of the Unified Development
Ordinance.
The granting of this waiver will not affect the subdivision of other land since the
proposed plan provides the extension of streets and utilities to the adjacent tracts.
LOT 13R
LOT 33
(47,423 SF)
0.460 AC.
(30,484 SF)WILLIAMS CREEK DRIVECOOPER COURT0.500 AC.
0.618 AC.
(32,356 SF)
(26,920 SF)
(26,143 SF)
(27,370 SF)
(20,022 SF)
(21,777 SF)
WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY- SH 40
WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY- SH 40ROCK PRA
IR
IE
ROADROBCON WAYWILLIAMS LAKE DR
I
V
E
0.506 AC.
0.461 AC.
0.512 AC.
0.587 AC.
0.653 AC.
0.478 AC.
0.477 AC.
0.572 AC.
LOT 50
0.743 AC.
0.480 AC.
0.504 AC.
0.626 AC.
0.518 AC.
LOT 46
0.483 AC.
0.517 AC.
0.641 AC.
0.506 AC.
LOT 39
0.500 AC.
0.506 AC.
0.500 AC.
0.471 AC.
0.528 AC.0.526 AC.
0.490 AC.
0.518 AC.
0.506 AC.
2.226 AC.
0.770 AC.
POND 1B
LOT 69
LOT 20
LOT 14
COMMON AREA 3,
OPEN SPACE AND
STORMWATER
DETENTION
LOT 66
LOT 25
LOT 17
LOT 18
LOT 21
LOT 15
LOT 16
LOT 22
LOT 24
LOT 19
LOT 58LOT 59 LOT 57 LOT 56
LOT 26
LOT 68LOT 70LOT 71
LOT 9
LOT 67
LOT 23
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 3
BLOCK 3
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 3
BLOCK 5
LOT 12R
0.901 AC.
LOT 11R0.664 AC.
LOT 10R0.537 AC.
0.470 AC.CA 6
Amenity Center
12.053 AC.
COMMON AREA 1,
OPEN SPACE AND
STORMWATER
DETENTION
(22,022 SF)
0.534 AC.
LOT 30
LOT 48
LOT 35
LOT 510.524 AC.
0.700 AC.LOT 28
LOT 40
0.500 AC.
LOT 52
LOT 47
0.545 AC.
0.557 AC.
0.524 AC.
LOT 37
0.636 AC.
LOT 31
LOT 44
LOT 32
0.512 AC.
(62,578 SF)
0.552 AC.
0.628 AC.
LOT 38
0.552 AC.
(22,809 SF)
LOT 29
0.506 AC.
COMMON AREA 5
OPEN SPACE AND
STORMWATER
DETENTION
LOT 27
(22,031 SF)
1.405 AC.0.506 AC.LOT 53LOT 55
LOT 42
LOT 49
(22,843 SF)
LOT 43
LOT 41
LOT 54
0.519 AC.
1.437 AC.
(22,323 SF)
0.556 AC.
LOT 36
(24,235 SF)
(23,276 SF)
0.489 AC.
(24,062 SF)
LOT 34
(28,552 SF)
(22,627 SF)
(11,716 SF)
(22,381 SF)
(21,967 SF)
0.514 AC.
(61,191 SF)
0.655 AC.
0.600 AC.
(24,062 SF)
(27,715 SF)
0.663 AC.
1.089 AC.
0.269 AC.
(24,256 SF)COLSTEVENS COURT(22,688 SF)
(28,895 SF)
COMMON AREA 11
0.521 AC.
(21,311 SF)
(23,750 SF)
LOT 45
PHASE 4(21,775 SF)
JOE WILL DRIVE
JOE WILL
C
O
U
RT
LOT 65
(21,707 SF)
BLOCK 8
BLOCK 5
BLOCK 4
BLOCK 6
BLOCK 5 BLOCK 7
BLOCK 6BLOCK 6
BLOCK 4
BLOCK 3
BLOCK 2
0.498 AC.
BLOCK 5LOT 60
0.488 AC.
(21,277 SF)
JOE WILL DRIVECOMMON AREA
70.404
AC
.
BLOCK 7
BLOCK 3
0.262 AC.
0.339 AC.
(10,643 SF)
POND 1A
(9,345 SF)
0.289 AC.
(8,275 SF)
LOT 17
0.308 AC.
LOT 18
(13,437 SF)
0.277 AC.
(12,077 SF)
LOT 1
0.214 AC.
(9,318 SF)
LOT 2
0.337 AC.
(14,681 SF)
LOT 3
(8,475 SF)
0.195 AC.
LOT 4
0.193 AC.
(8,400 SF)
LOT 5
0.193 AC.
(8,401 SF)
LOT 6
0.265 AC.
(11,525 SF)
LOT 7
0.227 AC.
(9,867 SF)
LOT 8
0.210 AC.
(9,145 SF)
LOT 90.236 AC.(10,276 SF)
LOT 10
0.319 AC.
(13,875 SF)
LOT 110.231 AC.
(10,083 SF)
LOT 12
0.206 AC.
(8,986 SF)(8,988 SF)
0.206 AC.
LOT 13
(8,400 SF)
0.193 AC.
LOT 14
(8,411 SF)
0.193 AC.
LOT 15
(11,423 SF)
LOT 16
0.190 AC.
LOT 2 LOT 1
(12,941 SF)0.297 AC.(10,140 SF)
0.233 AC.
LOT 3
(9,170 SF)
LOT 4
0.211 AC.
(9,140 SF)
0.210 AC.
(8,108 SF)
LOT 5
LOT 60.186 AC.
(14,746 SF)
LOT 8
LOT 7
(12,671 SF)
0.291 AC.
0.202 AC.
LOT 9
(8,792 SF)(9,450 SF)
0.217 AC.
LOT 10
(9,524 SF)
0.219 AC.
LOT 11
0.215 AC.
LOT 12 LOT 13
(14,740 SF)
0.338 AC.
0.244 AC.
LOT 15
LOT 14
0.214 AC.
(9,330 SF)
LOT 16
(8,708 SF)
(12,569 SF)
0.200 AC.
LOT 17
LOT 18
LOT 20
0.252 AC.
0.309 AC.
(13,477SF)
(10,992 SF)
LOT 19
(11,956 SF)
0.274 AC.
BLOCK 9
PHASE 3
PHASE 2BPHASE 2C
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 7
PHASE 2A
PHASE 1
PHASE 1
COMMON AREA 8
0.666 AC.
0.100 AC.
COMMON AREA 4
COMMON AREA 2 MADDEN CIRCLE
BLOCK 7 MADDEN CIRCLEBLOCK 7
BLOCK 7
0.013 AC.C.A.
12
C.A. 10
COMMON AREA 9
JACK DRIVE(29,021 SF)WISE LANEC.A.
13WISE LANEMADDEN C
IRCLE
MADDEN CIRCLE MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINECOMMON AREA
7COMMON AREA
7
VICINITY MAP
SHEET INDEX AND ZONING DISTRICTSSHEET 3 OF 3SHEET 2 OF 3PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
REVISEDPRELIMINARY PLAN
PHASE 1: 35.137 ACRES - 28 LOTS (14.782 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 2A: 8.456 ACRES - 12 LOTS (0.269 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 2B: 1.586 ACRES - 2 LOTS
PHASE 2C: 6.308 ACRES - 18 LOTS (0.708 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 3: 7.123 ACRES - 20 LOTS (0.544 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 4: 15.860 ACRES - 17 LOTS (1.405 ACRES COMMON AREA)
WILLIAMS CREEK LAKE ESTATES
SUBDIVISION
74.470 ACRES - 97 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
SAVE AND EXCEPT
20.021 ACRES
PHASE 1: LOT 9 BLOCK 1, LOTS 66-71 BLOCK 2, LOTS 14-26 BLOCK 3, LOTS
56-59 BLOCK 5 & COMMON AREAS 2 & 3
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PARKWAY EAST
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
WILLIAMS CREEK LAKE
ESTATES, INC.
P.O. BOX 800
COLEMAN, TX 76834
(979) 229-0310 PH. 2BPHASE 2CPHASE 3PHASE 2APHASE 4PHASE 1ROBCON WAYWILLIAMS LAKE DRI
V
E
COLSTEVENSCOURTWILLIAMS CREEK DRIVECOOPER COURTJOE WILL DRIVEJACK DRIVEWISE LANEWISE LANE
MADDEN CIRCLE
SHEET INDEX COLSTEVENSCOURTWILLIAMS CREEK DRIVECOOPER COURTJOE WILL DRIVEJACK DRIVEWISE LANEMADDEN CIRCLE
ESTATE ZONINGRESTRICTEDSUBURBANZONINGRESTRI
C
T
E
D
SUBUR
B
A
N
ZONIN
G
LOT 13R
LOT 33COOPER COURTROCK PRA
IR
IE
ROADROBCON WAYWILLIAMS LAKE DR
I
V
E
0.506 AC.
0.461 AC.
0.512 AC.
0.587 AC.
0.653 AC.
0.478 AC.
0.477 AC.
0.572 AC.
0.480 AC.
0.504 AC.
0.626 AC.
0.518 AC.
0.483 AC.
0.517 AC.
0.641 AC.
0.506 AC.
0.500 AC.
0.506 AC.
0.500 AC.
0.471 AC.
0.528 AC.0.526 AC.
0.490 AC.
0.518 AC.
0.506 AC.
2.226 AC.
0.770 AC.
POND 1B
LOT 69
LOT 20
LOT 14
COMMON AREA 3,
OPEN SPACE AND
STORMWATER
DETENTION
LOT 66
LOT 25
LOT 17
LOT 18
LOT 21
LOT 15
LOT 16
LOT 22
LOT 24
LOT 19
LOT 58LOT 59 LOT 57 LOT 56
LOT 26
LOT 68LOT 70LOT 71
LOT 9
LOT 67
LOT 23
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 3
BLOCK 3
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 3
BLOCK 5
LOT 12R
0.901 AC.
LOT 11R
0.664 AC.
LOT 10R
0.537 AC.
0.470 AC.CA 6
Amenity Center
12.053 AC.
COMMON AREA 1,
OPEN SPACE AND
STORMWATER
DETENTION
(22,022 SF)
LOT 30
LOT 28
LOT 52
0.545 AC.
0.557 AC.
0.524 AC.
LOT 31
LOT 32
0.512 AC.
0.552 AC.
0.552 AC.
(22,809 SF)
LOT 29
0.506 AC.
LOT 27
(22,031 SF)
0.506 AC.
LOT 53LOT 55 LOT 54
(22,323 SF)
0.556 AC.
(24,235 SF)
0.489 AC.
(24,062 SF)
LOT 34
(11,716 SF)
(21,967 SF)
(24,062 SF)
0.663 AC.
0.269 AC.
(24,256 SF)
(28,895 SF)
COMMON AREA 11
(21,311 SF)
(23,750 SF)
JOE WILL DRIVE
LOT 65
(21,707 SF)
BLOCK 8
BLOCK 5
BLOCK 4
BLOCK 3
BLOCK 2
0.498 AC.
BLOCK 5
LOT 60
0.488 AC.
(21,277 SF)
JOE WILL DRIVECOMMON AREA
70.404
AC
.
BLOCK 3
0.262 AC.
0.339 AC.
(10,643 SF)
POND 1A
(9,345 SF)
0.289 AC.
(8,275 SF)
LOT 17
0.308 AC.
LOT 18
(13,437 SF)
0.277 AC.
(12,077 SF)
LOT 10.214 AC.
(9,318 SF)
LOT 2
0.337 AC.
(14,681 SF)
LOT 3
(8,475 SF)
0.195 AC.
LOT 4
0.193 AC.
(8,400 SF)
LOT 5
0.193 AC.
(8,401 SF)
LOT 6
0.265 AC.
(11,525 SF)
LOT 70.227 AC.
(9,867 SF)
LOT 8
0.210 AC.
(9,145 SF)
LOT 9
0.236 AC.
(10,276 SF)
LOT 10
0.319 AC.
(13,875 SF)
LOT 11
0.231 AC.
(10,083 SF)
LOT 12
0.206 AC.
(8,986 SF)(8,988 SF)
0.206 AC.
LOT 13
(8,400 SF)
0.193 AC.
LOT 14
(8,411 SF)
0.193 AC.
LOT 15
(11,423 SF)
LOT 16
0.190 AC.LOT 2
LOT 1
(12,941 SF)
0.297 AC.
(10,140 SF)
0.233 AC.
LOT 3
(9,170 SF)
LOT 4
0.211 AC.
(9,140 SF)
0.210 AC.
(8,108 SF)
LOT 5
LOT 6
0.186 AC.
(14,746 SF)
LOT 8
LOT 7
(12,671 SF)
0.291 AC.
0.202 AC.
LOT 9
(8,792 SF)(9,450 SF)
0.217 AC.
LOT 10
(9,524 SF)
0.219 AC.
LOT 11
0.215 AC.
LOT 12
LOT 13
(14,740 SF)
0.338 AC.
0.244 AC.
LOT 15
LOT 14
0.214 AC.
(9,330 SF)
LOT 16
(8,708 SF)
(12,569 SF)
0.200 AC.
LOT 17
LOT 18
LOT 20
0.252 AC.
0.309 AC.
(13,477SF)
(10,992 SF)
LOT 19
(11,956 SF)
0.274 AC.
BLOCK 9PHASE 3
PHASE 2BPHASE 2C
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 7
PHASE 2A
PHASE 1
PHASE 1
COMMON AREA 8
0.666 AC.
0.100 AC.
COMMON AREA 4
COMMON AREA 2
WISE LANEMADDEN CIRCLE
BLOCK 7 MADDEN CIRCLEBLOCK 7
BLOCK 7
0.013 AC.C.A.
12
0.027 AC.
0.
0
1
5
A
C
.
C.A. 10
COMMON AREA 9
JACK DRIVE(29,021 SF)WISE LANEC.A.
130.021
AC
.WISE LANEMADDEN C
IRCLE
MADDEN CIRCLE MATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE0.019
AC
.
PRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
REVISEDPRELIMINARY PLAN
PHASE 1: 35.137 ACRES - 28 LOTS (14.782 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 2A: 8.456 ACRES - 12 LOTS (0.269 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 2B: 1.586 ACRES - 2 LOTS
PHASE 2C: 6.308 ACRES - 18 LOTS (0.708 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 3: 7.123 ACRES - 20 LOTS (0.544 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 4: 15.860 ACRES - 17 LOTS (1.405 ACRES COMMON AREA)
WILLIAMS CREEK LAKE ESTATES
SUBDIVISION
74.470 ACRES - 97 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
SAVE AND EXCEPT
20.021 ACRES
PHASE 1: LOT 9 BLOCK 1, LOTS 66-71 BLOCK 2, LOTS 14-26 BLOCK 3, LOTS
56-59 BLOCK 5 & COMMON AREAS 2 & 3
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PARKWAY EAST
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
WILLIAMS CREEK LAKE
ESTATES, INC.
P.O. BOX 800
COLEMAN, TX 76834
(979) 229-0310
WILLIAMS LAKE DRIVEMADDEN CIRCLE
C.A. 12
C.A. 13
LOT 33
(47,423 SF)
0.460 AC.
(30,484 SF)WILLIAMS CREEK DRIVECOOPER COURT0.500 AC.
0.618 AC.
(32,356 SF)
(26,920 SF)
(26,143 SF)
(27,370 SF)
(20,022 SF)
(21,777 SF)
WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY- SH 40
LOT 50
0.743 AC.
LOT 46
LOT 39
0.534 AC.
LOT 48
LOT 35
LOT 51
0.524 AC.
0.700 AC.
LOT 40
0.500 AC.
LOT 52
LOT 47
0.557 AC.
0.524 AC.
LOT 37
0.636 AC.
LOT 31
LOT 44
LOT 32
0.512 AC.
(62,578 SF)
0.628 AC.
LOT 38
(22,809 SF)COMMON AREA 5
OPEN SPACE AND
STORMWATER
DETENTION
1.405 AC.
LOT 53
LOT 42
LOT 49
(22,843 SF)
LOT 43
LOT 41
0.519 AC.
1.437 AC.
(22,323 SF)
0.556 AC.
LOT 36
(24,235 SF)
(23,276 SF)
0.489 AC.
LOT 34
(28,552 SF)
(22,627 SF)
(22,381 SF)
0.514 AC.
(61,191 SF)
0.655 AC.
0.600 AC.
(27,715 SF)
0.663 AC.
1.089 AC.
0.269 AC.
(24,256 SF)COLSTEVENS COURT(22,688 SF)
(28,895 SF)
0.521 AC.
(21,311 SF)
LOT 45
PHASE 4(21,775 SF)JOE WILL C
O
URT
BLOCK 4
BLOCK 6
BLOCK 5 BLOCK 7
BLOCK 6BLOCK 6
BLOCK 4
BLOCK 7MATCHLINE
JOE WILL DRIVE
C.A. 10
COMMON AREA 9
JACK DRIVEWISE LANEPRELIMINARY PLAN
NOT FOR RECORD
REVISEDPRELIMINARY PLAN
PHASE 1: 35.137 ACRES - 28 LOTS (14.782 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 2A: 8.456 ACRES - 12 LOTS (0.269 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 2B: 1.586 ACRES - 2 LOTS
PHASE 2C: 6.308 ACRES - 18 LOTS (0.708 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 3: 7.123 ACRES - 20 LOTS (0.544 ACRES COMMON AREA)
PHASE 4: 15.860 ACRES - 17 LOTS (1.405 ACRES COMMON AREA)
WILLIAMS CREEK LAKE ESTATES
SUBDIVISION
74.470 ACRES - 97 LOTS
THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, A-9
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
SAVE AND EXCEPT
20.021 ACRES
PHASE 1: LOT 9 BLOCK 1, LOTS 66-71 BLOCK 2, LOTS 14-26 BLOCK 3, LOTS
56-59 BLOCK 5 & COMMON AREAS 2 & 3
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PARKWAY EAST
College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC
409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
WILLIAMS CREEK LAKE
ESTATES, INC.
P.O. BOX 800
COLEMAN, TX 76834
(979) 229-0310
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 6
June 15, 2017
Final Plat
for
Holik’s Restricted Home Sites Block 1, Lot 1R
Including a Replat of
Holik’s Restricted Home Sites Block 1, Lot 1
FP2017-000005
SCALE: 1 lot on approximately 0.48 acres
LOCATION: 200 Timber Street
ZONING: GS General Suburban
APPLICANT: William Sears
PROJECT MANAGER: Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner
rlazo@cstx.gov
PROPERTY OVERVIEW: The proposed Final Plat is a replat to consolidate one lot and two
tracts into one lot.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the waiver request to the Unified
Development Ordinance Section 12-8.3.k “Sidewalks” to allow a
building plot to plat without providing a sidewalk as identified in the
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan.
If the waiver request is approved by the Commission, staff
recommends approval of the Final Plat. If the waiver request is
denied the Commission should either deny the Final Plat or approve
the Final Plat with a condition regarding the sidewalk.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 6
June 15, 2017
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 6
June 15, 2017
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 6
June 15, 2017
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1938
Zoning: R-1 Single-Family Residential renamed GS General Suburban
(2013)
Final Plat: Lot 1 – 1940
Tracts 2 & 3 – Unplatted
Site development: One building plot containing one primary residential structure.
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: N/A
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks are proposed in the Pedestrian Master Plan for Timber
Street. The applicant is requesting a waiver to UDO Section 12-
8.3.k “Sidewalks” to allow a subdivision without providing a
sidewalk as identified in the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways
Master Plan.
Bicycle Connectivity: Bikes lanes are proposed in the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Plan for Timber St. Bike lanes will be constructed
when Timber is widened.
Impact Fees: N/A
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with
approved Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance with one
exception. The applicant requests a waiver to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 12-
8.3.K “Sidewalks”, which states sidewalks are not required “along existing local/residential
streets unless sidewalks have been identified in the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master
Plan or in the applicable neighborhood, district, or corridor plan.”
In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and
Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver:
1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved
such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the
applicant of the reasonable use of his land;
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 6
June 15, 2017
Tract Two was originally owned by College Station ISD when the rest of Holik’s
Restricted Homesites and Oakwood Subdivisions were platted. When Timber Street
was constructed, CSISD sold the remaining tract and has been used as a single
building plot with Lot 1. As a result of this special circumstance, Tract Two is currently
unplatted while the surrounding properties were platted in 1940. Tract Three was
originally a reserve strip that was created when Holik’s Restricted Homesites first
platted, and was intended to function as a public utility easement. The reserve strip has
since been through the quitclaim process, and is also part of the original building plot.
Given the existing sidewalks along the CSISD frontage, and the funded Capital
Improvements Project for sidewalks along Anna between Glade and Timber, if the City
were to improve this section of Timber, it would likely be on the section across the
street.
While the denial of waiver will not deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the land,
the replat is needed in order to legally consolidate the land based on its use over the
past few decades.
2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right of the applicant;
If the waiver is not granted, Tract Two and Three will not be able to develop. In order to
plat the property without the waiver, the applicant will need to resubmit and request to
pay into the Sidewalk Fund prior to the approval of the plat.
3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering
this chapter; and
Granting the requested waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this
chapter. The property has been used as one building plot as early as the 1940s.
4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this
chapter.
Granting the requested waiver does not prevent the orderly subdivision of land.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the waiver request to the Unified Development Ordinance Section
12-8.3.k “Sidewalks” to allow a building plot to plat without providing a sidewalk as identified in
the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan.
If the waiver request is approved by the Commission, staff recommends approval of the Final
Plat. If the waiver request is denied the Commission should either deny the Final Plat or
approve the Final Plat with a condition regarding the sidewalk.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 of 6
June 15, 2017
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
\\neon\BCS_Projects\data\BCS\Proj_2016\E0574000_HOLIK'S ADDITION - MINOR PLAT\cadd\Platting\E0574000_PL01 Replat.dwg | 5/31/2017 4:17 PM
NOTES:1. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE RECONSTRUCTEDNORTHEAST LINE OF BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD ADDITIONACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOL. 82, PG. 521OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS.RECORD BEARING: N 45°W.2. CURRENT TITLE APPEARS VESTED IN EMMA JANEWILLIAMS BY VIRTUE OF DEED RECORDED IN VOL. 8535,PG. 75 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS.3. THE SUBJECT TRACT DOES NOT LIE WITHIN THE 100YEAR FLOODPLAIN ACCORDING TO THE F.E.M.A. FLOODINSURANCE RATE MAP FOR BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS ANDINCORPORATED AREAS. COMMUNITY NO. 480083, PANELNO. 0305F, MAP NO. 48041C0305F. EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL2, 2014.4. 1/2" IRON RODS & CAP SET AT ALL CORNERS UNLESSOTHERWISE SPECIFIED.5. LOT 1R, BLOCK 1 - 0.48 ACRE - IS SUBJECT TO U.D.O.SECTION 12-8.3.H.2VICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALESUBJECTTRACTSCALE: 1"=30' MARCH, 2017CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS ---GEORGEBUSHDRIVEField notes of a 0.09 acre tract or parcel of land, lying and being situated in the J. E. ScottSurvey, Abstract No. 50, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, and being part of Lot 1, Block 1,Holik's Restricted Homesites, according to the plat recorded in Volume 104, Page 450, of theDeed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and being part of the 0.30 acre tract both beingdescribed in the deed from the Estate of Leonard C. Williams, deceased, Cause No.13000-068-PC, County Court At Law No. 2, Brazos County, Texas, to Emma Jane Williams,recorded in Volume 8535, Page 75, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and part ofa 5' strip adjoining the northwest side of Lot 1, as described in the deed from Paul L. Frost toLeonard C. Williams, and wife, Emma Jane Williams, recorded in Volume 189, Page 534, of theDeed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and said 0.09 acre parcel being more particularlydescribed as follows:BEGINNING at a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set at the common corner between thebeforementioned Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 2, Block 1, Holik's Restricted Homesites, and being inthe southwest right-of-way line of Timber Street - 50' wide right-of-way;THENCE S 44° 41' 57≈ W along the common line between the beforementioned Lot 1 andLot 2, for a distance of 15.00 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set;THENCE N 45° 00' 00≈ W parallel to and 15 feet southwest of the southwest right-of-wayline of Timber Street, for a distance of 65.72 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set;THENCE parallel to and 10 feet south of the south right-of-way line of Timber Street, asfollows:N 82° 18' 52≈ W for a distance of 165.30 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set at thebeginning of a curve, concave to the north, having a radius of201.84 feet,Westerly along said curve, for an arc distance of 86.46 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and capset in the common line between the beforementioned 0.30 acretract and a 5' strip as shown on the plat of Oakwood Addition,recorded in Volume 82, Page 520, of the Deed Records of BrazosCounty, Texas, the chord bears N 70° 02' 35≈ W - 85.80 feet;THENCE N 45° 00' 00≈ W along the south line of the beforementioned 0.30 acre tract, fora distance of 44.73 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap found marking a northwest corner of the said0.30 acre tract;THENCE N 45° 03' 41≈ E along a west line of the beforementioned 0.30 acre tract, for a distanceof 5.01 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap found marking a northwest corner of the said 0.30 acre tract,same being in a curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 191.84 feet, and in the southright-of-way line of Timber Street - 60' wide right-of-way, as shown on the plat recorded inVolume 3588, Page 153, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas;THENCE along the south and southwest right-of-way lines of Timber Street, as follows:Easterly along said curve, for an arc distance of 125.05 feet to the end of this curve,the chord bears S 63° 38' 28≈ E - 122.84 feet,S 82° 18' 52≈ E for a distance of 154.95 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set, at thenorth corner of the beforementioned 5' strip,S 45° 18' 03≈ E for a distance of 5.00 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set,N 44° 41' 57≈ E for a distance of 13.29 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set at the northcorner of the beforementioned Lot 1, Block 1,S 45° 00' 00≈ E for a distance of 75.00 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING,containing 0.09 acre of land, more or less.Timber Street Right-of-way Dedication0.09 AcreJ. E. Scott Survey, A-50College Station, Brazos County, TexasTIMBERSTREETANDERSONSTREETTEXASAVENUEHOLIKSTREETLOT 1 BLOCK 1LOT 1R, BLOCK 10.48 ACRE10.0'15.0'16' PUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENTCERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERKSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF BRAZOSI, _________________________________, CountyClerk, in and for said county, do hereby certify thatthis plat together with its certificates of authenticationwas filed for record in my office the ___ day of________________, 2017, in the Official Records ofBrazos County, Texas, in Volume ________ Page___________. WITNESS my hand and official Seal, at my office inBryan, Texas.__________________________________County Clerk,Brazos County, TexasCERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEERI, ________________________________, City Engineer of the City of CollegeStation, Texas, hereby certify that this Subdivision Plat conforms to therequirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the City of College Station._______________________________City EngineerCity of College StationTHE STATE OF TEXAS §COUNTY OF BRAZOS §Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared LindaHarley known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to theforegoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same forthe purpose and consideration therein stated.Given under my hand and seal on this ________ day of ________________,2017.___________________________________Notary Public, Brazos County, TexasCERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATIONSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF BRAZOSWe, The Estate of Emma Jane Williams, owners and developers of the landshown on this plat, and designated herein as Lot 1R, Block 1, Holik's RestrictedHome Sites, an addition to the City of College Station, Texas, and whose nameis subscribed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of the public forever all streets,alleys, parks, greenways, infrastructure, easements, and public places thereonshown for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. All suchdedications shall be in fee simple unless expressly provided otherwise.________________________________Linda Harley, ExecutorCERTIFICATE OF SURVEYORSTATE OF TEXASCOUNTY OF BRAZOSI. S. M. Kling, Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 2003,in the State of Texas, hereby certify that this plat is true andcorrect and was prepared from an actual survey of the propertyand that property markers and monuments were placed undermy supervision on the ground._______________________________S. M. Kling, R.P.L.S. No. 2003CERTIFICATE OF CITY PLANNERI, ________________________________, City Planner of the City of CollegeStation, Texas, hereby certify that this Subdivision Plat conforms to therequirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the City of College Station.________________________________City PlannerCity of College StationCOLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS.164$.1%-*1.+-54'564+%6'&*1/'5+6'51(J. E. SCOTT SURVEY, A-50(+0#.2.#6190'�&&'8'.12'&$; +0%.7&+0)#.16$.1%-*1.+-54'564+%6'&*1/'5+6'581.2)1(4'2.#66*''56#6'1('//#,#0'9+..+#/59+.&'40'5564#+.4+%*#4&5106:
ÄR.O.W. DEDICATION0.09 ACRE14+)+0#.%10(+)74#6+10(+0#.2.#6VARIABLE WIDTHPUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENTField notes of a 0.48 acre tract or parcel of land, lying and being situated in the J.E. Scott Survey, Abstract No. 50, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, and being partof Lot 1, Block 1, Holik's Restricted Homesites, according to the plat recorded in Volume104, Page 450, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and being part of the 0.30acre tract both being described in the deed from the Estate of Leonard C. Williams,deceased, Cause No. 13000-068-PC, County Court At Law No. 2, Brazos County, Texas,to Emma Jane Williams, recorded in Volume 8535, Page 75, of the Official Records ofBrazos County, Texas, and part of a 5' strip adjoining the northwest side of Lot 1, asdescribed in the deed from Paul L. Frost to Leonard C. Williams, and wife, Emma JaneWilliams, recorded in Volume 189, Page 534, of the Deed Records of Brazos County,Texas, and said 0.48 acre parcel being more particularly described as follows:BEGINNING at a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set at the common southerly corner betweenthe beforementioned Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, Holik's Restricted Homesites, andin the northeast line of a 10' reserve strip, as shown on the beforementioned plat ofHolik's Restricted Homesites;THENCE N 45° 00' 00≈ W along the common line between the beforementionedLot 1, Block 1 and the beforementioned 10' reserve strip, for a distance of 80.00 feet to a˜≈ iron rod and cap set in the northwest line of the beforementioned 5' reserve strip;THENCE S 44° 41' 57≈ W along the northwest line of the beforementioned 5'reserve strip for a distance of 10.00 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set at the commoncorner between the said 5' reserve strip and the beforementioned 0.30 acre tract and inthe northeast line of a 5' strip as shown on the plat of Oakwood Addition, recorded inVolume 82, Page 520, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas;THENCE N 45° 00' 00≈ W along the common line between the beforementioned0.30 acre tract and the beforementioned 5' strip (82/520) for a distance of 195.63 feet to a˜≈ iron rod and cap set in the south line of proposed Timber Street - 70' wideright-of-way, same being in a curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 201.84 feet;THENCE along the south line of the proposed Timber Street - 70' wide right-of-way, asfollows:Easterly along said curve, for an arc distance of 86.46 feet to a ˜≈ iron rodand cap set at the end of this curve, the chord bears S 70° 02' 35≈ E - 85.80feet,S 82° 18' 52≈ E for a distance of 165.30 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set inthe southwest right-of-way line of Timber Street - 65'right-of-way;THENCE S 45° 00' 00≈ E along the southwest right-of-way line of Timber Street -65' wide right-of-way, for a distance of 65.72 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set in thecommon line between the beforementioned Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 1;THENCE S 44° 41' 57≈ W along the common line between the beforementionedLot 1 and Lot 2, for a distance of 126.52 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing0.48 acre of land, more or less.Lot 1R, Block 10.48 AcreJ. E. Scott Survey, A-49College Station, Brazos County, TexasTRACT TWO0.31 ACREVOL. 8535, PG. 75TRACT THREE0.03 ACREVOL. 189, PG. 534Field notes of a 0.31 acre tract or parcel of land, lying and being situatedin the J. E. Scott Survey, Abstract No. 50, College Station, Brazos County,Texas, and being all of the called 0.30 acre tract described in the deed to EmmaJane Williams, recorded in Volume 8535, Page 75, of the Official Records ofBrazos County, Texas, and said 0.31 acre tract being more particularlydescribed as follows:BEGINNING at a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set at the common corner betweenthe beforementioned 0.30 acre tract and the west corner of Block 1, Holik'sRestricted Home Sites, according to the plat recorded in Volume 104, Page 450,of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and being in the northeast line ofOakwood Addition, according to the plat recorded in Volume 82, Page 520, ofthe Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, from which a 1≈ iron pipe foundbears N 73° 11' E - 0.45 feet;THENCE N 45° 00' 00≈ W along the common line between thebeforementioned 0.30 acre tract and the beforementioned Oakwood Addition,for a distance of 240.36 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set at the west corner ofthe said 0.30 acre tract;THENCE N 45° 03' 41≈ E along the common line between thebeforementioned 0.30 acre tract and the transition line between the 65' wideright-of-way and the 60' wide right-of-way of Timber Street according to the platof College Station I.S.D. Willow Branch and Oakwood School Sites, recorded inVolume 3588, Page 153, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, for adistance of 5.01 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set in the south right-of-way line ofTimber Street - 60' wide right-of-way, same being at the beginning of a curveconcave to the north, having a radius of 191.84 feet;THENCE along the south right-of-way line of the beforementioned TimberStreet - 60' wide right-of-way, as follows:Easterly along said curve for an arc distance of 125.06 feet to a 5/8≈ ironrod and cap found marking the end of this curve, thechord bears S 63° 38' 28≈ E - 122.84 feet,S 82° 18' 52≈ E for a distance of 154.95 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap setat the east corner of the beforementioned 0.30 acretract and in the northwest line of a 5' wide reserved stripas shown on the plat of the beforementioned Holik'sRestricted Home Sites;THENCE S 44° 41' 57≈ W along the common line between thebeforementioned 0.30 acre tract, and the beforementioned Holik's - 5' reservedstrip, for a distance of 138.20 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing0.31 acre of land, more or less.Emma Jane Williams0.31 Acre TractJ. E. Scott Survey, A-50College Station, Brazos County, TexasField notes of a 0.01 acre tract or parcel of land, lying and being situated in the J.E. Scott Survey, Abstract No. 50, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, andbeing all of the 5' reserved strip Holik's Restricted Home Sites, described in thedeed to Leonard C. Williams and wife, Emma Jane Williams, recorded in Volume189, Page 534, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and said 0.01acre tract being more particularly described as follows:BEGINNING at a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set at the intersection of thesoutheast line of the 0.30 acre tract described in the deed to Emma JaneWilliams recorded in Volume 8535, Page 75, of the Official Records of BrazosCounty, Texas, with the northeast line of the 10' reserve strip as shown on theplat recorded in Volume 104, Page 450, of the Deed Records of Brazos County,Texas, the south corner of the said 0.30 acre tract bears S 44° 41' 59" W~10.00';THENCE N 44° 41' 57≈ E along the common line between thebeforementioned 0.30 acre tract and the beforementioned Holik's - 5' reservedstrip, for a distance of 128.20 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set at the east cornerof the said 0.30 acre tract;THENCE S 45° 18' 03≈ E across the beforementioned Holik's - 5' reservedstrip, for a distance of 5.00 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set in the common linebetween the said 5' reserved strip and Lot 1, Block 1, Holik's Restricted HomeSites, a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set at the north corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, and inthe southwest right-of-way line of Timber Street - 50' wide right-of-way, bears N44° 41' 57≈ E - 13.29 feet;THENCE S 44° 41' 57≈ W along the common line between thebeforementioned Holik's - 5' reserved strip, and the beforementioned Lot 1,Block 1, for a distance of 128.23 feet to a ˜≈ iron rod and cap set at the westcorner of Lot 1, Block 1;THENCE N 45° 00' 00≈ W along the northwest line of the beforementioned10' reserve strip (104/450), for a distance of 5.00 feet to the PLACE OFBEGINNING, containing 0.01 acre of land, more or less.Emma Jane Williams5' Reserved StripHolik's Restricted Home SitesJ. E. Scott Survey, A-50College Station, Brazos County, Texas
June 15, 2017
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – 4098 Raymond Stotzer Parkway
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Mark Bombek, Senior Planner Planning & Development Services
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official
Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from MF Multi-Family and GC General Commercial to MF Multi-
Family and GC General Commercial for approximately 17.8 acres generally located at the
northeast corner of the intersection of Turkey Creek Road and Raymond Stotzer Frontage
Road. Case #REZ2017-000012 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the July 13th
City Council Meeting- Subject to change.)
Relationship to Strategic Goals: Neighborhood Integrity, Diverse Growing Economy
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning.
Summary: This request is amending the zoning district boundaries on the property to rezone
approximately 1.2 acres of land of the larger 17.8 acre tract from GC General Commercial to MF
Multi-Family. The land use composition for the 17.8 acre tract is requested to be adjusted as
follows; 12 acres MF Multi-Family and 5.8 acres GC General Commercial to 13.2 MF Multi-
Family and 4.6 acres GC General Commercial
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject lot is designated Urban and
General Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map and
is also located in Presidential Corridor Gateway District. With easy access to Easterwood
Airport and being in close proximity to the recently built Health Science Center as part of the
Texas A&M University System, this Gateway District should be accommodating business
including research and development, office, and light industrial. These uses should build on
the assets existing in the area while protecting and enhancing this primary gateway into the
City. The proposed development complements and is consistent with the allowable land
uses for the Presidential Corridor Gateway District and with the surrounding future land use
designations.
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood: The existing MF Multi-Family and GC General
Commercial zoning, were approved in the spring of 2016. These zonings allow for high
density residential and intense commercial uses, which are compatible with the level of
development that is anticipated for the area. Given the property’s close proximity to the
BioCorridor Planned Development District, this area is expected to contain uses that support
the investment plan that has been set in this District.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed
land uses permitted through this request are those allowed in MF Multi-Family and GC
General Commercial. The uses are appropriate as they support the uses planned in the
BioCorridor PDD and the property’s frontage along Raymond Stotzer Parkway. The intent of
the area surrounding the BioCorridor District is to help preserve and support the district by
providing similar and supplementary uses that focus on research and development,
manufacturing, office uses, and other additional uses that would serve those that live and
work in the area. The applicant feels the request meets the intent of the district which is to
provide an atmosphere capable of creating the mixed use development desired for the
BioCorridor District.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
property is currently zoned MF Multi-Family and GC General Commercial. The current
zoning district is suitable for the property given the anticipated growth that will occur in and
around the BioCorridor District. The current request is still suitable as the rezoning boundary
is requested to be shifted to allow for an exchange of some GC General Commercial zoning
for MF Multi-Family zoning.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
property can currently be marketed under the existing MF Multi-Family and GC General
Commercial zoning district. The proposed amendment should not have a substantial effect
on the marketability of the property as the existing zoning boundary is shifting within the
property.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water service will be provided by the City
of College Station. The tract is currently not adjacent to an existing water line. The tract will
need to extend the water line from an existing 8-inch main along the frontage of Raymond
Stotzer Parkway to and through the subject property. Off-site Public Utility easements would
be needed to extend waterline services to the subject property.
The City of College Station has an inter-local agreement with Texas A&M University to
provide sewer service to the subject tract. The tract has allocated sewer capacity reserved
with the Inter-local Agreement. The applicant has provided a sealed sewer demand letter
that proposes to not exceeding the allowable sewer capacity specified in the inter-local
agreement. The tract is currently not adjacent to an existing sanitary sewer line. The tract
will need to extend the sewer line from an existing manhole in the Aggie Field of Honor
Memorial Cemetery that ultimately sewers to a lift station. Off-site easements and
downstream improvements are needed in order to serve the property. These improvements
include, but are not limited to providing a private lift station, existing lift station and force
main modifications, and providing upgrades to TAMU sewer systems.
The subject property is located in the Whites Creek Drainage basin. White Creek Tributary 8
crosses the subject tract. Detention will be required with the development.
Drainage and other public infrastructure required with the site shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Background Information
2. Aerial & Small Area Map
3. Application
4. Rezoning Map
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 15, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Date: July 13, 2017
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
None
Property owner notices mailed: 9
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Business Park R Rural Vacant
South (Across
Raymond Stotzer) Texas A&M University C-U College University Easterwood
Airport
East Institutional/Public R Rural
Cemetery and
existing
commercial
use
West (Across
Turkey Creek Suburban Commercial R Rural Vacant
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: June 1995
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation renamed R Rural in 2013
MF Multi-Family and GC General Commercial in 2016
Final Plat: N/A
Site development: Vacant
June 15, 2017
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – Harper’s Crossing Block 1 Lot 2
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Jenifer Paz AICP, Senior Planner
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official
Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned
Development District for approximately 2 acres being Harper's Crossing Block 1, Lot 2 of the
Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, located at 2849 Barron Road. Case #REZ2017-
000006 (Final action on this item is scheduled for the June 19, 2017 City Council Meeting-
subject to change)
Relationship to Strategic Goals: Diverse & Growing Economy
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
Summary: The applicant has requested an amendment to the existing PDD Planned
Development District and associated concept plan to allow for the development of fuel sales.
The existing base zoning of C-3 Light Commercial allows for the development of 2 fuel pumps,
though the adopted concept plan did not account for the land use. The request is to keep the C-
3 Light Commercial standards as the base of the PDD, but to allow for the use of 4 fuel pumps
and the development of a fuel sales area on the concept plan. Additional development
standards are proposed to mitigate the impact of fuel sales and fuel canopy on the neighboring
properties and to provide community benefits that achieve the goals and strategies of the
Comprehensive Plan.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is designated on the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Suburban Commercial. This
designation is intended for concentrations of commercial activities that cater primarily to
nearby residents versus the larger community or region. As a result, design of these
structures are intended to be compatible in size, roof type and pitch, architecture, and lot
coverage with the surrounding single-family residential uses.
The current zoning of the property is PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning
of C-3 Light Commercial zoning. The proposed rezoning is amending the layout on Lot 2
from the previously approved PDD Concept Plan to allow for the construction of a fuel
canopy with up to 4 fuel pumps. Additionally, the proposed PDD Concept Plan includes
modifications by providing an additional open space and canopy trees along the single-
family properties, architectural standards that are compatible with residential structures, and
limiting site lighting. Given these modifications, the proposed PDD Planned Development
District and associated Concept Plan are consistent with the SC Suburban Commercial
designation.
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood: The uses requested for the PDD are those
allowed under the current PDD and C-3 Light Commercial, with the addition 2 fuel pumps
(total of 4 fuel pumps). A 15-foot open space and 15-foot landscape buffer yard with a 6-foot
wall are being provided adjacent to the single-family properties to the north and east. The
proposed Concept Plan requires the building on the property to provide site lighting and
architectural design that is consistent with those required in SC Suburban Commercial,
which are complementary to residential construction. Given the modification to the
architectural standards and additional buffer area between the uses, the proposed uses of
the subject lot are compatible with surrounding GS General Suburban zoned properties.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The property is
located at the intersection of a 4-lane Minor Arterial, Barron Road, and a highway, William D.
Fitch Parkway. This is a suitable location for a small scale commercial development that
could serve the existing Sonoma and Barron Crest residential subdivisions, as well as future
residential planned for in the area.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The size
and location of the property is suitable for light commercial uses. With its proximity to single-
family lots and at the intersection of two thoroughfares, the uses allowed under the C-3 Light
Commercial zoning district are suitable for this property with the modifications listed in the
Concept Plan notes.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
property is currently marketable for small scale commercial and office uses. The purpose of
the request is to allow for a fuel canopy and additional fuel pumps.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for the proposed use: The subject tract is located adjacent to an
18-inch water main along Barron and a 24-inch water main along William D. Fitch Parkway.
An 8-inch sanitary sewer main is located near the northeast property corner.
The subject tract is located in the Spring Creek Drainage Basin. There is no FEMA
regulated Special Flood Hazard Area located on this tract. Development of this tract will be
required to meet the City’s Storm Water Design Guidelines. The subject tract is located in
the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area.
Access to the property has been established with development of Phase 1 on Lot 1. Lot 1
and 2 will have shared access from the existing driveways at Barron Road and William D.
Fitch Parkway.
REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN
The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building and
parking areas as well as other site related features. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also
request variations to the general site development standards provided that those variations are
outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. The Unified
Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD
Concept Plans:
1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with
the character of the surrounding area;
2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and
purpose of this Section;
3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not
adversely affect adjacent development;
4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street
directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association;
5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not
limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities;
6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle,
or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated
by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing
zoning and land uses in the area.
General
The proposed Concept Plan includes an amendment to the existing PDD Concept Plan to allow
for the construction of a fuel canopy and 2 additional fuel pumps (total of 4 pumps). The building
will allow uses consistent with light commercial, including convenience store, dry-cleaner, and
retail sales & services.
Building Height – The commercial building will be approximately 12-30 feet tall and subject to
the single-family residential height protection (UDO 12-7.2.H).
Drainage – The applicant states that the storm water will drain from the site to Barron Road
storm sewer system and the existing detention pond will remain as-is on the site.
Requested Modifications
The applicant has requested the following modifications from the requirements of the Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO).
1. Fuel Pumps – The applicant has requested to vary from UDO Section 12-6.4.G. “Fuel
Sales,” specifically to the maximum number vehicles obtaining fuel simultaneously. C-3
Light Commercial allows a maximum of 4 vehicles obtaining fuel simultaneously, which
equivalently allows only 2 fuel pumps (2 vehicles per pump). Due to marketability of the
property, the applicant has requested 4 additional vehicles (4 fuel pumps) be permitted
on this lot.
Community Benefits
The applicant identified the following community benefits to offset proposed meritorious
modifications:
• The site will provide open space, in addition to the 15-foot buffer area required for
commercial development abutting single-family homes.
• Additional canopy trees will be provided along the single-family property to reduce light
pollution for vehicular traffic entering the site.
• The building will utilize architectural design required in SC Suburban Commercial, which
will help maintain the style and character of the abutting suburban single-family
neighborhoods.
• The site will provide lighting required in SC Suburban Commercial, to minimize the
impact on the neighboring single-family properties.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend approval of the rezoning request.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Background Information
2. Small Area Map and Aerial
3. Application
4. Concept Plan
5. Concept Plan Notes
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 15, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Date: June 19, 2017
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Sonoma HOA
Barron Crest HOA
Property owner notices mailed: 34
Contacts in support: None at the time of staff report.
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of staff report.
Inquiry contacts: One at the time of staff report.
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North General Suburban GS General Suburban
Single-Family
Residential (Sonoma
Subdivision)
South N/A N/A William D. Fitch Parkway
East
General Suburban GS General Suburban
Single-Family
Residential (Sonoma
Subdivision)
West
(Across Barron
Road)
Suburban
Commercial
R Rural Single-Family
Residential (unplatted)
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1995
Zoning: 1995 - A-O Agricultural Open
2006 – A-O Agricultural Open to C-3 Light Commercial
2008 – C-3 Light Commercial to PDD Planned Development District
2012 – PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development
District
Final Plat: Harper’s Crossing Subdivision Block 1, Lot 2.
Site development: Generally vacant, with an existing shared driveway and detention area that
serves the subject lot and Lot 1 of the Subdivision.
W
Crry r:p Con-ncn SrxrroN
Home ofTex* A&M Uniuusity"
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITTED:
TIME:
STAFF:
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
PLANNED
(REZON r NG) APPLTCATTON
DISTRICTS
k one) tr tst,240) Planned Devetopment District (pDD)
I Wrt\ Planned Mixed-Used Development (p-MUD)
X t$51€lwtodification to Existing PDD or P-MUD Amendment - planning & Zoning Commission and
City Council Review
Please use Concept Plan Minor Amendment Apptication for minor amendments as per Secfi'o n 3.4.J of the ltDO,
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
X $gt S - $1,240 Rezoning Application Fee.
ffi Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
I Traffic lmpact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the
proposed request.
X Copy of a fully dimensioned Rezoning Map on 24',x36,,paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change;c. Present zoning;
d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; ande. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
f Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & btock of subdivision, whichever is
applicable).
I Copy of the Concept PIan on 24"x36" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO.
E Copy of the Concept Plan on 8.5"x1 1" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO.
f, The attached Concept Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
checked off.
NOTE: lf a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed
within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference 3/1/2017
NAME OF pROJECI Convenience Sfore at 2849 Barron Road
ADDRESS 2849 Barron Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Lot 2, Block 1 of Harper's Crossing
GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY IF NOT PLATTED:
TOTAL ACREAGE 2 acres
Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 7
APPLICANT/PRoJECT MANAGER's tNFORMAT|oN (primary contact for the project):
y"r" Laura Walker, c/o BCS planner on Cail E-mail laura@cstxpoc.com
Street Address 1135 N Earl Rudder Fwy, Ste 100
Ci$ Bryan g1s1s Iexas Zip Code L7803
phone Number eil) 702-1516
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
prr" Andrew Dunlap
Fax Number
E-mail laura@cstxpoc.com
Street Address 5818 Stattion Ridge
City College Station
phone Number (281) 702-1516
OTHER CONTACTS (Ptease specify type of contact, i.e.
1rr" G/enn Jones with J4 Engineering
Street Address 1135 N Eart Rudder Fwy, Ste 100
g1s1s Iexas ZiP Code 77845
Fax Number
project manager, potential buyer, localcontact, etc.):
E_mail gjones@j4engi nee ri ng. com
City Bryan 9161s Iexas ZiP Code 77803
and recorded in Volume _, page
phone Number p79) 739-0567 Fax Number
This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated
of the Brazos County Official Records.
Existing Zoning PDD
Present Use of Property Vacant
Proposed Zoning PDD
Proposed Use of Property T,S0O S.F.ing center and 4 fuel
Proposed Use(s) of Property for pDD, if applicable:
P-MUD uses are prescribed in Section 6.2.C. Use Table of the Unified Development Ordinance
If P,MUD:
Approximate percentage of residential land uses:
Approximate percentage of non-residential land uses:
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary.
see attached Exhibit A.
7,500 S.F. shopping center and 4 fuel dispensers
Revised 5/15 Page 2 o'f 7
2. lndicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan. lf it is not, explain why thePlan is incorrect.
How will this zone change be compatible with the
the character of the neighborhood?
present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with
P/ease see attached Exhibit A.
see attached Exhibit A.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
see attached Exhibit A.
6' Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
see attached Exhibit A.
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change.
see attached Exhibit A.
Revised 5i'15 Page 3 of 7
see attached Exhibit A.
8. State the purpose and intent of the proposed development.
see attached Exhibit A.
2. Provide a generalstatement regarding the proposed drainage.
see attached Exhibit A.
3. List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought.
see attached Exhibit A.
4. lf variations are sought, please provide a list of community benefits and/or innovative design goncepts to justify the
request.
see attached Exhibit A.
CONCEPT PLAN SUPPORTING INFORMATION
see attached Exhibit A.
Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 7
Explain how the concept plan proposal will constitute and environment of sustained stability and will be in harmonywith the character of the surrounding area.
see attached Exhibit A.
6' Explain how the prglosal ix! conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the comprehensive plan.
see attached Exhibit A.
Z. Explain how the concept plan proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will notaffect
8. State how dwelli units shall have access to a do not front on a
State how the development has provided adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to: parks, schoots,and other facilities.
Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 7
CONCEPTUAL PDD/P.MUD SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDTNANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(not necessarily to scale).
{
W
N
A key map (not necessarily to scale).
Title block to inctude:
B. Name, address, location, and tegatdescription.
X. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant
.__z
Al Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
K Name, address, and telephone number of architecVengineer (if differs from applicant)
K Date of submittat
fi- rotalsite area
North arrow.
100-year floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note ifthere is none on the site.
Show the approximate location of the following:
Parking areas
Building sites and an indication of their use
Artificially lit areas
Open spaces/conservation areas
Greenways
Streets and access
Parks
Schools
Trails
Buffer areas (or a statement indicating buffering proposed)
Other special features
f nnOro*imate accessways, pedestrian and bikeways.
X Common and open space areas.
Print FormRevised 5/15 PageT of7
EXHIBIT A: PDD Supporting Information
Page 1 of 4
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change
necessary.
An increase in the number of housing units creates an increased need for commercial uses
and fuel sales.
The location of this property relative to the abutting highway increases its value, which
requires a more intense use of the property to be profitable.
2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is
not, explain why the Plan is incorrect.
The zoning will remain the same with the exception of allowing for 2 additional fuel dispensers in
Phase II. As the existing PDD was approved in 2012 allowing for fuel sales, we feel that the addition
of 2 fuel dispensers, along with buffering and architectural features that exceed the requirements
in the UDO, is in accordance with the comprehensive plan.
3. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of
nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood?
Fuel sales are currently an allowed use in the C-3 base zoning district of this PDD. According to
the staff report when this PDD was amended in 2012, "the proposed uses are compatible with the
surrounding R-1 zoned properties."
In addition, 15 ft buffers with a 6 ft tall masonry wall are being provided along the residential
property lines, 15 ft wide open spaces are provided adjacent to the buffers, and the building will
utilize architectural features that exceed the NRA requirements in the C-3 zoning district and
maintain the style and character of the abutting single-family neighborhood.
4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
As indicated in the staff report when this PDD was amended in 2012, "The property is located at
the intersection of a minor arterial and a highway. This is a suitable location for a small scale
commercial development that could serve the existing Sonoma and Southern Trace residential
subdivisions, other existing large lot residential in the area, as well as future residential planned
for in the area." Allowing for 2 additional fuel dispensers will still serve the existing and planned
residential neighborhoods.
5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
As indicated in the staff report when this PDD was amended in 2012, "The property is located at
the intersection of a minor arterial and a highway. This is a suitable location for a small scale
commercial development that could serve the existing Sonoma and Southern Trace residential
subdivisions, other existing large lot residential in the area, as well as future residential planned
for in the area."
6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
Fuel sales are currently permitted in the existing PDD zoning for this property. However, allowing
for only 2 fuel dispensers at such a high value property located next to a highway makes this
EXHIBIT A: PDD Supporting Information
Page 2 of 4
property unprofitable and will further delay the orderly development of this part of the
community.
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change.
The proposed development promotes infill development within the community.
The proposed development will prevent the inclusion of less desirable uses adjacent to
single-family homes that are currently allowed in the PDD (i.e. radio/tv station/studio;
self-storage; and/or wireless telecommunication facilities).
It promotes walkability within and around the neighborhood, allowing residents to
literally walk to this convenience store.
Provides an increased tax base for the City in the form of increased property taxes and
increased sales taxes.
8. State the purpose and intent of the proposed development.
The proposed development includes a 7,500 square foot shopping center with a convenience
store and 2 retail spaces, and 4 fuel dispensers under a canopy to accommodate a total of 8 cars
at a time. The building will include architectural features that maintain the style and character of
the abutting single-family neighborhood, and more-than-adequate buffer space will be included
between the commercial uses and the abutting residences.
CONCEPT PLAN SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1. What is the range of future building heights?
All buildings will range from 12 to 30 FT in height.
2. Provide a general statement regarding the proposed drainage.
The existing detention area between the commercial building and the residential to the north of
the property will remain in place.
3. List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought.
The only request is to allow for a total of 4 fuel dispensers where only 2 fuel dispensers are
currently allowed.
4. If variations are sought, please provide a list of community benefits and/or innovative design
concepts to justify the request.
The site will provide an abundance of open space beyond the required buffering areas for
a commercial building abutting single-family homes.
The site provides recreation space for the multi-use path along William D Fitch as
proposed by the Bike, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan.
The site will use a pattern of development which preserves the existing drainage way and
prevents soil erosion.
The building will utilize architectural features that exceed the NRA requirements in a C-3
zoning district and help to maintain the style and character of the abutting suburban
single-family neighborhood.
EXHIBIT A: PDD Supporting Information
Page 3 of 4
The site will provide a more desirable environment than would be provided through other
uses that are currently allowed in this PDD, such as self-storage, tv/radio studio, and/or
wireless telecommunication tower uses.
5. Explain how the concept plan proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability
and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area.
The concept plan will remain the same with the exception of a smaller commercial building and
inclusion of 4 fuel dispensers. The decrease in the building size allows for an increase in the buffer
areas between the commercial use and the abutting single-family neighborhood. In addition, the
proposed architectural features on the building will maintain the style and character of the
abutting single-family uses.
6. Explain how the proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
The future land use designates this property as Suburban Commercial and General Suburban in
the growth area GIV. According to the comprehensive plan, "suburban or neighborhood
commercial and office uses are also appropriate for this [growth] area," and suburban commercial
"is generally for concentrations of commercial activities that cater primarily to nearby residents
versus the larger community or region." With only 240 square feet (1.7%) of the total 13,740
square feet of commercial space within this land use area being utilized for 4 fuel dispensers, this
development primarily caters to nearby residents versus the larger community or region.
7. Explain how the concept plan proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on
abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development.
The proposed concept plan is an improvement from the previously approved concept plan in that
it allows for additional buffering space between the commercial uses and the neighboring single-
family neighborhood. This additional buffer space helps to detract from adversely affecting the
adjacent development.
8. State how dwelling units shall have access to a public street if they do not front on a public
street.
There are no dwelling units within either phase of this PDD area.
9. State how the development has provided adequate public improvements, including, but not
limited to: parks, schools, and other public facilities.
The concept plan incorporates a detention area for stormwater management.
Parkland dedication is not required for commercial developments, but an additional 15 ft
wide open space is being provided outside of the buffer areas.
There is a public access easement provided along William D Fitch for the proposed multi-
use path proposed by the Bike, Pedestrian, & Greenways Master Plan.
Sidewalks are existing along both right-of-ways adjacent to the property.
EXHIBIT A: PDD Supporting Information
Page 4 of 4
10. Explain how the concept plan proposal will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
With the inclusion of additional buffering and architectural features that preserve the style and
character of the abutting single-family neighborhood, the concept plan proposal will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
11. Explain how the concept plan proposal will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of
vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected
to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonable anticipated in the area
considering existing zoning and land uses in the area.
The site has existing sidewalks along both adjacent right-of-ways and a 20 ft public access
easement is provided along William D Fitch for the future multi-use path proposed by the Bike,
Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan.
This document is released for the purpose of
interim review under the authority of Glenn Jones,
P.E. 97600 on 25-May-17. It is not to be used
for construction, bidding, or permitting purposes.
General Notes:
PO Box 5192 - Bryan, Texas - 77805
979-739-0567 www.J4Engineering.com
Firm# 9951
Concept
Plan
May 2017
As Noted
Barron Rd C-Store
Harper's Crossing
Block 1, Lot 2~2.0 Acres
College Station, Brazos County, Texas
J4 Engineering05/25/2017Barron Rd C-Store Site Plan2.dwgJ4E Project #17-004N.T.S.
N.T.S.
Concept Plan Notes:
1. The base zoning district is C-3 and the land uses proposed for this property are as
follows:
○ Educational facility, indoor instruction
○ Educational facility, primary and secondary
○ Government facilities
○ Health care, medical clinics
○ Parks
○ Places of worship
○ Animal care facility, indoor
○ Art studio/gallery
○ Day care, commercial
○ Dry cleaners & laundry*
○ Drive-in/drive-thru window
○ Fuel sales with up to 4 pumps**
○ Offices
○ Personal service shop
○ Printing/copy shop
○ Radio/TV station/studio
○ Restaurants
○ Retail sales & service
○ Storage, self-storage
○ Utility*
○ Wireless telecommunications facilities - intermediate*
○ Wireless telecommunications facilities - major (CUP required)
* Uses have specific use standards per Unified Development Ordinance, Article
6.3, Specific Use Standards.
** Only applies to Lot 2.
Conditions: Drive-in/drive-thru not allowed in conjunction with restaurant use.
2. The range of building heights is anticipated to be from 12’ to 30’, subject to UDO 12-
7.2.H.
3. The storm water drainage from this site will be taken to the Barron Road storm sewer
system. Storm water requirements will be in accordance with the UDO.
4. The existing detention pond will remain as-is.
5. A 15’ wide buffer will be provided as shown on the concept plan. In addition, an extra 15’
of open space will be provided outside the buffer yards. Additional canopy trees will be
provided within the buffer area & open space to minimize light projecting into the single
family properties.
6. Architecture for the site will meet or exceed all NRA standards. The building(s) on Lot 2
will meet the NRA requirements of the SC Suburban Commercial District.
7. Site lighting shall be provided as required for SC Suburban Commercial to minimize light
pollution on the neighboring single-family developments per UDO 12-7.11.C.
8. Lot 2 building size will range from 8,000-13,000 SF. Lot 2 improvements may be
constructed as one or two buildings.
June 15, 2017
Regular Agenda
Rezoning – Pebble Creek Ph 2C
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Jenifer Paz AICP, Senior Planner
Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official
Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from R Rural to RS Restricted Suburban and GS General Suburban
for approximately 2.43 acres being Pebble Creek Phase 2C, Block 20 and Block 21, of the
Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, located at 5101 & 5201 Pebble Creek Parkway, more
generally located at the intersection of Pebble Creek Parkway & Champions Boulevard. Case
#REZ2017-000011 (Final action on this item is scheduled for the July 13, 2017 City Council
Meeting- subject to change)
Relationship to Strategic Goals: Sustainable City
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
Summary: The applicant requests a rezoning from R Rural to RS Restricted Suburban (Block
21, 1.08 acres) & GS General Suburban (Block 20, 1.35 acres) to allow for the future
subdivision of the property.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is shown as Restricted
Suburban on the Future Land Use and Character Map. This designation is generally for
areas that should have a moderate level of development activity. These areas will tend to
consist of medium-density single-family residential lots (average 8,000 square feet) when
clustered around open spaces, or larger lots sizes when not clustered.
The proposed zoning district on Block 21, RS Restricted Suburban, is designed to provide
land for detached medium-density, single-family residential development. Consisting of
larger residential lots with a minimum of 10,000 square feet or averaging 8,000 square feet
when clustered around open space. This zoning request is consistent with the current
Future Land Use and Character Map.
GS General Suburban, proposed on Block 20, is also designed for single-family residential
purposes requiring a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. Although this requested
zoning does not reflect the Future Land Use & Character designation, it is consistent with
the spirit of the Pebble Creek Master Plan in that there would be a variety of single-family
products. The Pebble Creek development, as a whole, meets the density intentions of
Restricted Suburban. In addition the GS General Suburban request is consistent with the
existing zoning of the subdivision. Block 20 is adjacent to Pebble Creek Ph 2A, lots along
Stonebrair Circle, which is developed as a patio home section with lots sizes ranging
between 6,000 to 7,800 square feet, reflective of GS General Suburban zoning.
The Restricted Suburban land use designation precedes the adoption of RS Restricted
Suburban zoning district in October 12, 2013. The developed areas of Pebble Creek
subdivision, including the adjacent residential areas, Phase 2A & 2B, were rezoned in the
early 1990s as GS General Suburban (formally R-1 Single Family Residential). Given the
characteristics of the adjacent properties and the current zoning of the subdivision, the
proposed zoning districts are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood: The surrounding single-family residential
properties are zoned GS General Suburban. Lots along Stonebrair Circle, Phase 2A,
adjacent to Block 20, are developed with an average lot size of 6,843 square feet. The
lots along Augusta Circle, Phase 2B, adjacent to Block 21, are developed with an
average lot size of 29,087 square feet.
The proposed GS General Suburban on Block 20 is suitable for this property given it will
allow for similar single-family development as those lots in Phase 2A. RS Restricted
Suburban, proposed on Block 21, is also suitable for the property as it will allow for
medium density single-family development similar to the lots in Phase 2B. The proposed
rezoning is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property
and with the character of the surrounding neighborhood.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The current
zoning district allows for single-family development but does not allow for more than one
single-family home on each lot. The rezoning request will enable further subdivision of
the property for additional single-family lots.
Block 20 is suitable for GS General Suburban and Block 21 is suitable for RS Restricted
Suburban given that the uses and density allowed in each district are similar to the
existing, adjacent lots in Phase 2A & 2B.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
properties are currently vacant and undeveloped. While these lots can be developed for
single-family residential under the current zoning district, the proposed rezoning to GS
General Suburban and RS Restricted Suburban is suitable given the consistent in character
to lots in the nearby vicinity.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
marketability of this property as R Rural is limited to large lot residential or agricultural uses
as allowed under the zoning district. While this property can be marketed under the current
zoning, a single-family residential zoning district that is consistent with the neighboring
development will enable the property to be subdivided in a similar pattern to the adjacent
single-family lots on Stonebriar and Augusta Circle.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water service will be provided by College
Station Utilities. There are existing 12-inch waterlines along the east side of Pebble Creek
Parkway with an 8-inch stub out located within Block 20. Additionally, there is an 8-inch
waterline on the south side of Champions Boulevard and Augusta Circle. Sanitary sewer
service is available via two existing 6-inch sewer mains.
The properties are located within the Lick Creek drainage basin. Sites are generally draining
towards Pebble Creek Parkway. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with
subdivision shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Design
Guidelines.
The subject lots have frontage to Champions Boulevard, Stonebriar Circle and Augusta
Circle, all designated and designed as local streets. The properties also back up to Pebble
Creek Parkway, a 2-lane Major Collector. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required
with the rezoning application based on the requested rezoning acreage in accordance with
the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). Based on street classification, access from
Pebble Creek Parkway would not be permitted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Background Information
2. Small Area Map & Aerial
3. Application
4. Rezoning map
5. Letter from Pebble Creek Owners Association
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 15, 2017
Advertised Council Hearing Date: July 13, 2017
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Pebble Creek HOA
Pebble Creek Garden HOA
Property owner notices mailed: 19
Contacts in support: None as of the date of the Staff Report
Contacts in opposition: None as of the date of the Staff Report
Inquiry contacts: 2 as of the date of the Staff Report
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive
Plan
Zoning Land Use
North Restricted Suburban GS General Suburban Single-Family
Residential
South Restricted Suburban GS General Suburban Single-Family
Residential
East
(across Stonebriar
Circle)
Natural Areas –
Protected
R Rural Pebble Creek Country
Club
West
(across Pebble
Creek Pkwy)
Natural Areas –
Protected &
Restricted Suburban
R Rural & GS General
Suburban
Common Area/Open
Space & Single-Family
Residential
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: October 1983
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation (1983)
A-O Agricultural Open renamed to R Rural (2014)
Final Plat: Block 20 & 21 of Pebble Creek Phase 2C
Site development: Vacant
£
Ex. 1
Pebble Creek Phase 2C
Zoning Map Amendment
April 2017
Rezoning Map
RS - Restricted Suburban
GS - General Suburban
R - Rural
Zoning:
Rural
HYLAND DAVID C & CLAUDIA E
PEBBLE CREEK PH 2B,
BLOCK 17, LOT 35 ACRES: 0.57
PEBBLE CREEK DEVELOPMENT
C/O YOUNG DAVIS
PEBBLE CREEK PH 2C,
BLOCK 21, LOT ALL, ACRES: 1.08
PEBBLE CREEK DEVELOPMENT
C/O YOUNG DAVIS
PEBBLE CREEK PH 2C,
BLOCK 20, LOT ALL, ACRES: 1.35
PEBBLE CREEK INTERESTS LTD
PEBBLE CREEK, LOT ALL PLATTED GOLF COURSE LOTS,
ACRES: 238.585 & PEBBLE CREEK PH 2C,
BLK 19 & ADJ ACREAGE: 238.59
SMITH R L JR & CONNIE JEAN
PEBBLE CREEK PH 2A,
BLOCK 15 & 16, COMMON AREAS
ACRES: 3.00 KEPRTA DONALD F & JO CAROLYN PEBBLE CREEK PH 2A, BLOCK 15, LOT 44 ACRES: 0.16Zoning:
Rural
Zoning:
General Suburban
Zoning:
General Suburban
Zoning:
General Suburban
20' Utility Easement20' Utility Easement20' Utility Easement
20' Utility Easement
SIMPSON JAMES H & LOIS PEBBLE CREEK PH 2B, BLOCK 17, LOT 1STONEBRIAR CIR50' ROWAUGUSTA CIRCLE60' ROWFIRESTONE DRIVE
50' ROW PUBLIC ALLEYPEBBLE CREEK PARKWAY100' ROWCHAMPIONS BOULEVARD
100' ROW
Existing
PEBBLE CREEK INTERESTS LTD
PEBBLE CREEK, LOT ALL PLATTED GOLF COURSE LOTS,
ACRES: 238.585 & PEBBLE CREEK PH 2C,
BLK 19 & ADJ ACREAGE: 238.59
PEBBLE CREEK PARKWAY100' ROWSTONEBRIAR CIR50' ROWAUGUSTA CIRCLE60' ROWFIRESTONE DRIVE
50' ROW
CHAMPIONS BOULEVARD
100' ROW
PEBBLE CREEK INTERESTS LTD
PEBBLE CREEK, LOT ALL PLATTED GOLF COURSE LOTS,
ACRES: 238.585 & PEBBLE CREEK PH 2C,
BLK 19 & ADJ ACREAGE: 238.59
PEBBLE CREEK DEVELOPMENT
C/O YOUNG DAVIS
PEBBLE CREEK PH 2C,
BLOCK 20, LOT ALL, ACRES: 1.35
PEBBLE CREEK DEVELOPMENT
C/O YOUNG DAVIS
PEBBLE CREEK PH 2C,
BLOCK 21, LOT ALL, ACRES: 1.08
SIMPSON JAMES H & LOIS PEBBLE CREEK PH 2B, BLOCK 17, LOT 1HYLAND DAVID C & CLAUDIA E
PEBBLE CREEK PH 2B,
BLOCK 17, LOT 35 ACRES: 0.57 KEPRTA DONALD F & JO CAROLYN PEBBLE CREEK PH 2A, BLOCK 15, LOT 44 ACRES: 0.16SMITH R L JR & CONNIE JEAN
PEBBLE CREEK PH 2A,
BLOCK 15 & 16, COMMON AREAS
ACRES: 3.00
Zoning:
General Suburban
Zoning:
General Suburban
Zoning:
Restricted Suburban
Zoning:
General Suburban
Proposed
S
H
6
S
O
U
T
H
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
6
R
O
A
D
E
A
S
T
L
A
K
E
W
A
Y
D
R
I
V
E ST ANDREWS
DR
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
6
R
O
A
D
W
E
S
T
ROYAL ADELADE DRIVEOAKS DRIVE S
O
U
T
H
O
N
R
A
M
P
6
S
OLD ARRINGTON ROADMISTY LANEARRINGTON ROADONYX DRIVEDECATU
R
D
RI
V
E WINGED FOOT DRWILLIAM D FITCH PARKWAYAUGUS
T
A
CI
R
C
L
E
FIRESTONE DRIVEW
H
I
T
E
'
S
C
R
E
E
K
L
N
Q
U
A
L
I
T
Y
C
I
R
C
L
E
C
A
S
C
A
D
E
S
D
R
I
V
EMUIRFIELD VILLAGESANDPIPER COVELAPIS COURTS
H
6
S
O
U
T
HVicinity Map
£
0 10.5 Miles
1 inch = 50 feet
Rezoning Boundary
20' Utility Easement20' Utility Easement20' Utility Easement20' Utility Easement
Feet010050
T. 979.260.6963
F. 979.260.3564
3204 Earl Rudder FWY S
College Station, TX 77845
Plan & Design Specialists in
Civil · Engineering · Hydraulics
Hydrology · Utilities · Streets
Site Plans · Subdivisions
www.mitchellandmorgan.com