Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/15/2016 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionPlanning and Zoning Commission Workshop College Station, TX Meeting Agenda - Final City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting. City Hall Council Chambers6:00 PMThursday, September 15, 2016 1. Call the meeting to order. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev Discussion of Minor & Amending Plats Approved by Staff. *Final Plat ~ Spring Creek Townhomes Phase 2 & 3 ~ 1778 Heath Drive ~ Case # FP2016-000031 (Lazo) 16-05884. Presentation, possible action, and discusssion regarding the consideration of the 2016 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached) 16-05675. Sponsors:Bombek 2016 Plan of WorkAttachments: Presentation, possible action, and discusssion regarding an update on the Wastewater Master Plan as a part of the 2016 P&Z Plan of Work. 16-05686. Sponsors:Coleman Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: *Thursday, September 22, 2016 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 2:00 p.m. and Regular 3:00 p.m. *Thursday, October 6, 2016 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 16-05897. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: *An Ordinance Amendment amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 7.2.H.2 "Single-Family Height Protection," of the Code of Ordinances. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 4, 2016, and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 8, 2016 and voted (6-0) to approve the request. *A Rezoning for approximately one acre located at the corner of Harvey Road and Pamela Lane from R Rural to SC Suburban 16-05908. Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016 September 15, 2016Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Agenda - Final Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 18, 2016 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 8, 2016 and voted (6-0) to approve the request. 9.Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board. 10.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 11. Adjourn. The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. APPROVED _____________________ City Manager I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on September 12, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. _____________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016 September 15, 2016Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting Agenda - Final Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016 City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-0588 Name:Minor/Amending Plats Status:Type:Updates Agenda Ready File created:In control:9/7/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Discussion of Minor & Amending Plats Approved by Staff. *Final Plat ~ Spring Creek Townhomes Phase 2 & 3 ~ 1778 Heath Drive ~ Case # FP2016-000031 (Lazo) Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Discussion of Minor & Amending Plats Approved by Staff. *Final Plat ~ Spring Creek Townhomes Phase 2 & 3 ~ 1778 Heath Drive ~ Case # FP2016-000031 (Lazo) College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:216-0567 Name:2016 P&Z Plan of Work Status:Type:Updates Agenda Ready File created:In control:9/2/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Presentation, possible action, and discusssion regarding the consideration of the 2016 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached) Sponsors:Mark Bombek Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:2016 Plan of Work Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Presentation, possible action, and discusssion regarding the consideration of the 2016 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached) College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work Comprehensive Plan Items Implementation of Adopted Plans Summary: Implementation of adopted master plans and neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely: Central College Station, Eastgate, Southside Area, Wellborn Community, and South Knoll Area neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian & Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste Water, Medical District, and Economic Development master plans. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion: on-going Review of Adopted Plans Summary: Project Dates: After action review of adopted planning areas, specifically Northgate, BioCorridor, and Medical Districts. This may also include a tour of one of the planning areas mentioned above. Staff Assigned: Economic Development & Molly Hitchcock Anticipation Initiation: Update on Wastewater Master Plan Summary: Project Dates: This plan is intended to provide a holistic look at the City’s wastewater system and provide information on potential solutions and costs so that Wastewater System Capital Improvement Projects can be planned in the future by City Staff. 9/15/16: Provide an update to P&Z on the Wastewater Master Plan- DC Staff Assigned: Water/Wastewater Anticipated Completion: 9/15/2016 Impact Fees for Water, Wastewater, and Roadways Summary: Engineering consultants have been engaged and impact fee studies are underway. Council recently appointed the P&Z Commission as the Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC) with additional members for representation from the ETJ (water/wastewater), and Home Builders Association, as well as citizens/neighborhoods. Several presentations and findings are forthcoming to the IFAC and Council over the next few months for review and consideration. The IFAC will eventually be asked to advise the Council on Impact Fees. Project Dates: 7/21/16: IFAC began to review calculation of maximum impact fees 8/4/16: IFAC reviewed calculation of maximum impact fees for Water/ Wastewater and provided comment. 9/1/16: IFAC reviewed calculation of maximum impact fees for roadways and provided comment. Staff Assigned: Alan Gibbs & Dave Coleman Completed: 9/1/2016 *Annexation Task Force Implementation Summary: Project Dates: Implement the City's future annexation policy as identified in the revised Growth Management and Capacity chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Assigned: L. Simms Anticipated Initiation: Neighborhood Integrity Items *Traffic Calming Toolkit Summary: Receive information regarding the current traffic calming policy, including updates as recommended by the Council Transportation and Mobility Committee. Additionally receive update on the implementation of the neighborhood parking toolbox created by the Neighborhood Transportation Task Force. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Danielle Singh & Troy Rother Anticipated Completion: Spring 2017 Traffic Impact Analysis for Single-Family Development Summary: Review the Traffic Impact Analysis ordinance and consider a recommendation to require TIAs for Single- Family Residential development. Project Dates: 8/4/16: P&Z recommended approval of Single-Family TIA Ordinance Amendment 8/11/16: City Council approved Single- Family TIA Ordinance Amendment Staff Assigned: Danielle Singh Completed: 8/11/16 Student Housing in Established Single-Family Neighborhoods Summary: Research best practices from other communities regarding the management of student housing in single-family neighborhoods. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Tiffany Cousins Anticipated Completion: Winter 2016-2017 Update on Landscaping Requirements for Single-Family Developments Summary: Provide an update on the City’s landscaping requirements for single-family development and recommend adjustments as deemed necessary. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: P&DS Anticipated Completion: Spring 2017 UDO Regulatory Items Wellborn Zoning Districts Summary: Implement the Wellborn Community Plan by creating new or modified zoning districts as described in the Plan. Project Dates: 6/16/16: P&Z recommended approval of UDO amendment for zoning districts 7/28/16: City Council adopted UDO amendment for zoning districts Staff Assigned: J. Bullock Completed: July 2016 Sign Ordinance Revisions Summary: Review and update the City’s sign ordinance in light of the recent Supreme Court decision regarding sign regulations based upon content. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: P&DS & Legal Anticipated Completion: Spring 2017 Update on Off-Street Parking Requirements Summary: Provide an update on the City’s off-street parking requirements. Receive Information regarding current off-street parking requirements including options that provide flexibility. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: P&DS Anticipated Completion: Spring 2017 *Research Multi-Family Zoning Options Summary: Research the ability to provide multi-family zoning for market rate units (conventional multi-family) vs. rental by bedroom (student multi-family). Project Dates: Staff Assigned: P&DS Anticipated Completion: Spring 2017 On-Going Items Pre-Application Conference Overview Summary: Provide an update on the Pre-Application Conference process. Project Dates: 07/07/16 Provide an overview of the PAC Process and provide an update on the PAC survey. Staff Assigned: Bombek Completed: 7/7/16 Quarterly Review of Pre-Application Conference Surveys Summary: Provide an update on the survey results from the Pre-Application Conference process. Project Dates: Staff Assigned: Bombek Anticipated Completion: on-going Economic Development Updates Summary: Receive regular updates from the Economic Development Department regarding the vision and implementation of the commercialization of TAMU research- related output, including examples of successful efforts elsewhere. Additionally, receive an update on the recent announcement regarding plans for the TAMU System Riverside Campus revitalization effort. Project Dates: 6/16/2016 Economic development efforts and land availability for commercial uses, Presentation at P&Z Workshop. Staff Assigned: Economic Development Anticipated Initiation: June 2016 City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:216-0568 Name:Water/Wastewater Master Plan Update Status:Type:Updates Agenda Ready File created:In control:9/2/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Presentation, possible action, and discusssion regarding an update on the Wastewater Master Plan as a part of the 2016 P&Z Plan of Work. Sponsors:David Coleman Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Presentation, possible action, and discusssion regarding an update on the Wastewater Master Plan as a part of the 2016 P&Z Plan of Work. College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:216-0589 Name:Upcoming Meetings Status:Type:Updates Agenda Ready File created:In control:9/7/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: *Thursday, September 22, 2016 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 2:00 p.m. and Regular 3:00 p.m. *Thursday, October 6, 2016 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: *Thursday, September 22, 2016 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 2:00 p.m. and Regular 3:00 p.m. *Thursday, October 6, 2016 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-0590 Name:Updates on Items Heard Status:Type:Updates Agenda Ready File created:In control:9/7/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: *An Ordinance Amendment amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 7.2.H.2 "Single-Family Height Protection," of the Code of Ordinances. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 4, 2016, and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 8, 2016 and voted (6-0) to approve the request. *A Rezoning for approximately one acre located at the corner of Harvey Road and Pamela Lane from R Rural to SC Suburban Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 18, 2016 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 8, 2016 and voted (6-0) to approve the request. Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: *An Ordinance Amendment amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 7.2.H.2 "Single-Family Height Protection," of the Code of Ordinances. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 4, 2016, and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 8, 2016 and voted (6-0) to approve the request. *A Rezoning for approximately one acre located at the corner of Harvey Road and Pamela Lane from R Rural to SC Suburban Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 18, 2016 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 8, 2016 and voted (6-0) to approve the request. College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Planning and Zoning Commission Regular College Station, TX Meeting Agenda - Final City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting. City Hall Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, September 15, 2016 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 4. Consent Agenda Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from meetings. *Casey Oldham ~ September 1, 2016 16-05514.1 Casey OldhamAttachments: Consideration, possible action, and dicussion to approve meeting minutes. *September 1, 2016 ~ Workshop *September 1, 2016 ~ Regular 16-05874.2 September 1 2016 Workshop September 1 2016 Regular Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a 16-05984.3 Page 1 College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016 September 15, 2016Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final Preliminary Plan for Brewster Pointe consisting of 67 residential lots on approximately 21.921 acres and 5 common areas on approximately 4.753 acres located at 3451 Barron Cut-Off Road, generally located south of Barron Cut-Off. Case #PP2016-000015 Sponsors:Cousins Staff Report Application PP Brewster Pointe Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Traditions Phase 101 consisting of two lots and common area on approximately 22 acres, generally located south of the intersection of HSC Parkway and South Traditions Drive. Case #FPCO2016-000015 16-05614.4 Sponsors:Bullock Staff Report Application Final Plat Attachments: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Williams Creek Lake Estates Ph. 1 consisting of 29 single-family lots and 3 common areas on approximately 36 acres located at 2442 Carll Lane, generally located northwest of the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and Rock Prairie Road East. Case #FP2015-000012 16-05524.5 Sponsors:Thomas Staff Report Application Final Plat Ph. 1 Attachments: Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Conditional Use Permit for a Mobile Food Court in NG-1, located at 203 First Street, which is generally located south of Church Avenue and west of First Street. Case #CUP2016-000001 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 13, 2016 City Council meeting - subject to change.) 16-05426. Sponsors:Thomas Page 2 College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016 September 15, 2016Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final Staff Report Site Plan Application Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District to T Townhouse for approximately 14.636 acres being J.W. Scott Survey, Tract 29, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, Recorded in Volume 7541, Page 214 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, generally located north of Harvey Road and west of FM 158.Case #REZ2016-000025 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 13, 2016 City Council meeting - subject to change) 16-05707. Sponsors:Lazo Staff Report Application Rezoning Map Attachments: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from O Office to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 1.66 acres being Lot G, Chimney Hill Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, recorded in Volume 3043, Page 204, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, generally located at the intersection of Tarrow Street and Autumn Circle. Case REZ2016-000027 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 13, 2016 City Council meeting - subject to change) 16-05698. Sponsors:Lazo Staff Report Application Rezoning Map Concept Plan Attachments: 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any Page 3 College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016 September 15, 2016Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda - Final deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 10. Adjourn The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. APPROVED _____________________ City Manager I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on September 12, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. _____________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 4 College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016 City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-0551 Name:Absence Requests Status:Type:Absence Request Agenda Ready File created:In control:8/30/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from meetings. *Casey Oldham ~ September 1, 2016 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Casey Oldham Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from meetings. *Casey Oldham ~ September 1, 2016 College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name Casey Oldham Request Submitted on August 30, 2016 I will not be in attendance at the meeting on September 1, 2016 for the reason specified: (Date) Signature Casey Oldham Will not be available for the meeting. City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-0587 Name:Minutes Status:Type:Minutes Agenda Ready File created:In control:9/7/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Consideration, possible action, and dicussion to approve meeting minutes. *September 1, 2016 ~ Workshop *September 1, 2016 ~ Regular Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:September 1 2016 Workshop September 1 2016 Regular Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Consideration, possible action, and dicussion to approve meeting minutes. *September 1, 2016 ~ Workshop *September 1, 2016 ~ Regular College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ September 1, 2016 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 6 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Workshop Meeting September 1, 2016 5:30 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Jerome Rektorik, Johnny Burns Jodi Warner, Barry Moore and Jim Ross COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham IFAC MEMBERS PRESENT: Don Hellriegel, Randy French CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Blanche Brick, Steve Aldrich CITY STAFF PRESENT: Kelly Templin, Chuck Gilman, Jeff Kersten, Donald Harmon, Lance Simms, Alan Gibbs, Molly Hitchcock, Natalie Ruiz, Carol Cotter, Danielle Singh, Kevin Ferrer, Mark Bombek, Jessica Bullock, Jenifer Paz, Jennifer Prochazka, Rachel Lazo, Madison Thomas, Tiffany Cousins, Timothy Horn, Mary Ann Powell, Lauren Basey and Kristen Hejny 1. Call the meeting to order. Chairperson Kee Called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. 2. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the Roadway Impact Fee Advisory Committee reviewing and making a recommendation on the Maximum Calculated Roadway Impact Fees. This item was heard after Workshop Agenda Item #3. City Engineer Gibbs and Jeff Whitacre, Consultant, presented this item to the IFAC. IFAC Member Hellriegel asked if the Maximum Calculated Fee, is a product of state law, or Staff recommendation. City Engineer Gibbs stated that the Maximum Calculated Fee is based on state law allowance. IFAC Member French asked for a clarification on a “vehicle mile”. Jeff Whitacre, Kimley Horn, responded that a vehicle mile is the product of a calculation of trip length times the number of trips based on one peak hour. Mr. Whitacre also stated that the calculations are calibrated to individual cities based upon data provided from the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). IFAC Member Hellriegel asked if the benchmark city numbers are the assessed impact fee, or the maximum fee. Mr. Whitacre stated that these numbers are the assessed fee. September 1, 2016 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 6 IFAC Member French asked if the benchmark cities presented were the only cities utilizing Roadway Impact Fees. Mr. Whitacre stated that there are approximately 50 cities in Texas that have enacted the Roadway Impact Fees. Chairperson Kee asked if the benchmark cities used the Roadway Impact Fees for both residential and non-residential developments, or were any land use categories exempt. Mr. Whitacre responded that the Impact Fees/vehicle mile can be set to specific land uses. Commissioner Rektorik asked if the impact fee can be changed by City Council after adoption. Mr. Whitacre stated that the fee cannot go above the maximum and that with a public hearing and through the impact fee process, the fee can be changed/updated, however, an evaluation of the fee is required every five years. Mr. Whitacre stated that developments that build public infrastructure receive credit for the dollars they spend toward an arterial road or collector road and could potentially not pay an impact fee. Developers who are not building infrastructure would pay impact fees. IFAC Member French asked if a developer paying into an Oversize Participation Agreement would be exempt from the Roadway Impact Fee. City Engineer Gibbs stated that the credit toward the impact fees would be another way/means to “over participate”. IFAC Member French asked if the Impact Fees would be paid on the developers end or at building permit. Mr. Whitacre responded that the fee would be paid at building permit. City Engineer Gibbs stated that any impact credit would be assessed at platting. Commissioner Moore asked if the credits were pro-rated or up to the developer on how the credits are used. Mr. Whitacre stated that it is recommended for credits to be tied to the land. Mr. Whitacre stated that Staff is looking for feedback/comments to present to City Council on impact fee collection rates. Commissioner Ross stated that he believes it would be counter-intuitive to charge a fee to corporations or business moving to College Station. He also stated that he would like to hear thoughts and input from an Economic Development standpoint. Director of Economic Development Ruiz stated that Staff tried to strike a balance between generating needed revenue and not discouraging businesses from locating in College Station. She stated that non- residential impact fees are lower and they have discussed providing exemptions, different ways of funding through incentives, or development agreements. September 1, 2016 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 6 Commissioner Ross asked if growing businesses are accustomed to paying impact fees when beginning in a new town. Director of Economic Development Ruiz stated that businesses are accustomed to the fees, however, they are usually waived. Commissioner Rektorik asked if companies or corporations looking to move into the area evaluate the economic advantages of operating in that area. Director of Economic Development Ruiz stated that yes, they do an evaluation on the economic advantages including overall cost, taxes, and impact fees. Commissioner Ross asked if there are any specific areas that will be exempted from the impact fees. Director of Economic Development Ruiz stated that staff have discussed identifying specific land uses for setting impact fee at $0, but a conclusion has not been made. Chairperson Kee asked if this exemption determination would have to be made before the November 10th City Council meeting. City Engineer Gibbs confirmed that any exempt areas would need to be identified before the November 10th City Council meeting. Mr. Gibbs also stated that if the IFAC has areas of concern on exempting specific land uses, they can make such a recommendation in comments that will be presented to City Council. Commissioner Rektorik clarified that neither the City of Bryan nor Brazos County have Roadway Impact Fees at this time. City Engineer Gibbs stated that neither the City of Bryan, or Brazos County have an impact fee, but Wellborn Special Utility District has a water impact fee. Commissioner Warner stated that the City of Bryan has a transportation user fee. Commissioner Rektorik, asked if the City of College Station is looking into creating a transportation fee. City Engineer Gibbs stated that the City of College Station is currently evaluating a transportation fee only for maintenance. Commissioner Warner asked if Texas A&M University (TAMU) would incur a fee. City Engineer Gibbs stated that the fee would not apply to most TAMU projects, but it would be case specific. Commissioner Warner asked if it is known where residential arterials are currently deficient. Mr. Whitacre stated that the impact fee would help fund expansion on roadways, not existing deficiencies to roadways. City Engineer Gibbs stated that the impact fee is charging for the increase of capacity in roadways. September 1, 2016 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 6 Commissioner Warner stated that she does not feel comfortable in adding a fee to new developments in the City. Ms. Warner also stated that adding fees to commercial developments will inhibit commercial developments building in new residential areas. City Engineer Gibbs reiterated the example fees Staff is recommending. He also stated that the same fee is being proposed across all four impact fee areas. Mr. Gibbs also stated that Staff was recommending fee amounts that they believed the market could sustain, and keep the City competitive. IFAC Member Hellriegel asked if, within a benchmark basis, are the fees that are recommended by Staff lower than those of the benchmark cities. City Engineer Gibbs stated that the recommended fees are lower than benchmark cities and the fees are an important funding source for the budget and transportation city. Commissioner Moore stated his concerns for putting an impact fee on any land use that will result in basic jobs. He also stated his concerns for additional hurdles for new businesses planning to develop in College Station, and that he is opposed to Roadway Impact Fees for commercial developments. IFAC Member French stated that he is opposed to Roadway Impact Fees on both commercial and single- family developments. Mr. French suggested utilizing a usage tax to help with funding. Commissioner Warner stated her concerns for adding a Roadway Impact Fee on single-family homes, causing more one acre lots. Ms. Warner was concerned about pushing single-family developments into the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). City Engineer Gibbs addressed concerns for higher impact fees throughout the City, stating that Staff is recommending the fees be flat across all four impact fee areas. Commissioner Ross stated his concerns for implementing a Roadway Impact Fee before an evaluation on raising tax rates. Commissioner Burns stated his agreement with Commissioner Ross citing concerns for low tax rates and comparisons to benchmark cities who are already implementing Roadway Impact Fees. IFAC Member Hellriegel stated his support of raising taxes and utility fees. Commissioner Rektorik stated his concerns for implementing Roadway Impact Fees before evaluating higher tax and utility rates. Chairperson Kee stated that all funding sources should be considered. Ms. Kee also stated that she does not like the idea of the impact fees affecting the job creators, but a waiver process and an Economic Development evaluation will help the process. She also stated that she does not feel comfortable with recommending a Roadway Impact Fee amount, but does believe this is something that should be evaluated. Mr. Whitacre stated that the Impact Fees are to be reviewed every six months, and Staff is looking for a starting rate, so some of the data that is not presented will be presented at the six month reviews. Commissioner Warner asked for a list of other towns that are utilizing Roadway Impact Fees. September 1, 2016 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 6 Mr. Whitacre responded that towns such as Baytown and Houston are currently implementing fees, Galveston and Fulshear are evaluating roadway impact fees. IFAC Member French stated that the City needs a mechanism for better streets. He also stated that an Impact Fee would be counterproductive, and does not support the Roadway Impact Fee. IFAC Member Hellriegel stated that he will make his comments in writing to Staff. Commissioner Ross stated that the City is not using the tools they have available. He also stated that the City should attempt to the raise tax rate before implementing Impact Fees. Commissioner Warner stated that she does not support the proposed Roadway Impact Fee. Commissioner Burns stated that the city should implement a consumption fee and does not support a Roadway Impact Fee. Commissioner Moore stated again that he is opposed to any additional hurdles applied to new developments. Mr. Moore also stated that a tax increase should be implemented first. Commissioner Rektorik stated that the City should try raising the tax rate or implement a transportation fee and does not support a Roadway Impact Fee. 3. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. Workshop Agenda Item #3 was heard before Workshop Agenda Item #2. There was general discussion regarding Regular Agenda Item #12. 4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. 5. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff. *Final Plat ~ Minor Plat ~ Cottages of College Station Phase 3 ~ Case #FP2016-000021 (Bombek) *Final Plat ~ Minor Plat ~ WC Boyett Estates Partition Block 18 Lot 3R ~ Case #FP2012-500156 (Paz) There was no discussion. 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2016 P&Z Plan of Work. There was no discussion. 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a recommendation on the Planning & Zoning Commission’s appointments to the BioCorridor Board. There was general discussion amongst the Commission. Commissioner Rektorik motioned to recommend Commissioner Burns be appointed to the BioCorridor Board. Chairperson Kee seconded the motion, motion was approved (6-0). September 1, 2016 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 6 8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: *Thursday, September 8, 2016 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 4:30 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison – Oldham) *Thursday, September 15, 2016 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. Chairperson Kee reviewed upcoming meetings for the Planning & Zoning Commission. 9. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: *A Rezoning for approximately 23 acres located on Horseback Drive from R Rural to RS Restricted Suburban and NAP Natural Areas Preserved. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 4, 2016, and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. City Council heard this item on August 25, 2016, and voted (7-0) to approve the request. *A Comprehensive Plan Amendment for approximately 14.35 acres located at 2501 Earl Rudder Freeway South from Business Park to General Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 4, 2016, and coted (4-0-1) to recommend approval. City Council heard this item on August 25, 2016, and voted (7-0) to approve the request. *A Rezoning for approximately 14.35 acres located at 2501 Earl Rudder Freeway South from M-1 Light Industrial to M-1 Light Industrial and GC General Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 4, 2016, and coted (4-0-1) to recommend approval. City Council heard this item on August 25, 2016, and voted (7-0) to approve the request. There was no discussion. 10. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Bio Corridor Board. There was no discussion. 11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion. 12. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 7:24 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Jane Kee, Acting Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin. Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services September 1, 2016 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 5 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting September 1, 2016, 7:30 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Jerome Rektorik, Johnny Burns, Jodi Warner, Barry Moore and Jim Ross COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Aldrich, Blanche Brick CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Alan Gibbs, Molly Hitchcock, Natalie Ruiz, Carol Cotter, Erika Bridges, Mark Bombek, Jessica Bullock, Jenifer Paz, Rachel Lazo, Madison Thomas, Tiffany Cousins, Timothy Horn, Mary Ann Powell, Lauren Basey and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Hear Citizens 4. Consent Agenda 4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes. *August 4, 2016 Workshop *August 4, 2016 Regular *August 18, 2016 Workshop *August 18, 2016 Regular 4.2 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Development Plat for Majestic Oaks Subdivision consisting of one residential lot on approximately 3.757 acres located at 5701 Straub Road, and generally located west of the intersection of Straub Road and Thousand Oaks Road in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Case #DVPL2016-000003 Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve Consent Agenda Item 4.1-4.2. Commissioner Moore seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). September 1, 2016 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 5 Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed. 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding waiver requests to Unified Development Section 12-8.3.E.6 ‘Dead-End Streets’ and Section 12-8.3.G ‘Blocks;’ and presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for the Science Park consisting of three lots and one common area on approximately 53.8 acres located at 2501 Earl Rudder Freeway South, generally located north of North Forest Parkway and south of Raintree Drive, ease of Earl Rudder Freeway South. Case #PP2016-000013 Economic Development Director Ruiz presented the waiver requests and Final Plat to the Commission, and recommended approval. Chairperson Kee asked if the dead end streets, in question, would be extended in the future. Director Ruiz stated that the streets would remain dead-end streets. There was general discussion amongst the Commission. Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve the waiver requests and Final Plat stating that there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of Sections 12-8.3.E.6 ‘Dead-End Streets’ and Section 12-8.3.G ‘Blocks’, will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land and the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Commissioner Moore seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for The Science Park consisting of three lots and one common area on approximately 53.8 acres located at 2501 Earl Rudder Freeway South, generally located north of North Forest Parkway and south of Raintree Drive, east of Earl Rudder Freeway South. Case #FPCO2016-000016 Director of Economic Development Ruiz presented the Final Plat to the Commission, and recommended approval. There was no discussion. Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve of the Final Plat as presented by staff. Commissioner Moore seconded the motion, motion was approved (6-0). 8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a discretionary item to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 12-8.3.K.5.b ‘Fee in Lieu of Construction’ and Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Waterford Heights Subdivision consisting of four commercial, one rural, one common area and 54 single-family lots on approximately 25.47 acres located at 4201 Rock Prairie Road, generally located at the northeast corner of Rock Prairie Road and Bird Pond Road. Case #PP2016-000012 September 1, 2016 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 5 Senior Planner Paz presented the discretionary item regarding sidewalks, and Preliminary Plan to the Commission, and recommended approval. Commissioner Moore asked if there was a timeline on the realignment of Bird Pond Road. Senior Planner Paz stated that there is no time line, there will be Right-of-Way dedication with Phase Three. There was general discussion amongst the Commission. Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve the discretionary item of a fee in lieu of construction for the sidewalks along Rock Prairie Road, stating that existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an Estate/Rural context, and Preliminary Plan. Commissioner Burns seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 9. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a waiver request to Unified Development Section 12-8.3.H.1.g “Lots” and a public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for College Park Subdivision Lot 5R1 & Lot 5R2, Block 21 being a replat of College Park Subdivision Lot 5, Block 21 and .05 acre portion of College Park Subdivision (Vol. 38, Pg. 602) consisting of two lots on approximately one acre located at 301 Dexter Drive, generally located at the southeast corner of Dexter Drive and Newton Road. Case #FPMU2016-000001 Senior Planner Bullock presented the waiver request and Final Plat to the Commission, and recommended approval. Chairperson Kee asked if this waiver is granted, will it act like a Zoning Board of Adjustments (ZBA) variance and be attached to the land. Senior Planner Bullock stated that this waiver is only to allow the property to be platted, any additional variances would have to go through the ZBA. Applicant Veronica Morgan, 3204 Earl Rudder Freeway South, College Station, was available to answer questions from the Commission. Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Chairperson Kee closed the public meeting. Commissioner Rektorik motioned to recommend approval of the waiver request as stated by staff, meeting all waiver criteria, and Final Plat. Commissioner Burns seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 10. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Emerald Point Subdivision lots 1-6 being a replat of Agency Records Control, INC. Subdivision Lot 1A consisting of six lots on approximately 17.6 acres located at 3001 Earl Rudder Freeway South, College Station, September 1, 2016 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5 Texas generally located at the intersection of Emerald Parkway and Earl Rudder Freeway South frontage road. Case #FPCO2015-000010 Senior Planner Bombek presented the Final Plat to the Commission and recommended approval. There was general discussion amongst the Commission. Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing. Commissioner Ross motioned to approve the Final Plat. Commissioner Rektorik seconded the motion. Commissioner Warner asked if lot six were to be developed, would it have to follow the residential buffering and protection requirements. Senior Planner Bombek stated that, yes, it would still follow residential protection guidelines. The motion passed (6-0). 11. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 12-4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to SC Suburban Commercial for approximately three acres being situated in the Andrew McMahon survey, A-167, Brazos County, Texas, being comprised of all of a called 2.00 acre tract, referred to as Tract I, described in a deed dated January 4, 1993, from Darrell L. Ambler to Wellborn Water Supply Corporation, and recorded in Volume 1685, Page 10, all of a called 0.334 acre Tract, referred to as Tract 10, described in a deed executed October 18, 2000, from Wellborn Water Supply Corporation to Wellborn Special Utility District, and recorded in Volume 3991, Page 197, all of a called 0.46 acre tract as described in a deed dated August 18, 2006, from Boyd Mitchael Vincent, Administrator to Wellborn Special Utility District, and recorded in Volume 7536, Page 292, and a 50 foot strip as a described in a deed dated August 19, 2015, from Peach Creek Rental, Ltd. To Wellborn Special Utility District, and recorded in volume 12895, page 216, deed records, Brazos County, Texas, to which references are hereby made to for any and all purposes. Said tracts further being a part of the Benjamin Graham Subdivision, of record in Volume 12, Page 394, the referenced 2.00 acre tract being Lot 9A in the Benjamin Graham Subdivision, of record in Volume 1985, Page 195, and the 50 foot strip being a part of Lot 4A in the resubdivision of Blocks D & E of the Benjamin Graham Subdivision, of record in Volume 2463, Page 329, deed records, Brazos County, Texas, generally located at 3998 Greens Prairie Road West, more generally located at 3998 Greens Prairie Road West, more generally located at the northeast intersection of Greens Prairie Road West and Live Oak Street. Case #REZ2016-000024 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 22, 2016 City Council meeting – subject to change) This item was removed from the agenda and was not heard at this meeting. September 1, 2016 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5 12. Presentation, possible action, and discussing regarding a Comprehensive Plan Reapplication request for Harvey Mitchell Parkway Campus Housing Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Located at 404 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, generally located at the corner of Harvey Mitchell Parkway South and Raymond Stotzer Parkway. Case #CPA2016-000001 Staff Planner Thomas presented the reapplication request to the Commission. Commissioner Rektorik asked for clarification on the reasoning behind the reapplication request. There was further discussion amongst the Commission. Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Reapplication Request citing that there has been a substantial change in circumstances relevant to the issue and/or facts considered during review of the application that might reasonably affect the decision-making body’s application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed in the application based on the differing presentations presented to P&Z and City Council. Commissioner Burns seconded the motion. There was general discussion amongst the Commission. The motion passed (5-1), with Commissioner Ross voting against the motion. 13. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion. 14. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 8:31 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Jane Kee, Acting Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:216-0598 Name:Brewster Pointe Status:Type:Preliminary Plan Agenda Ready File created:In control:9/8/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Brewster Pointe consisting of 67 residential lots on approximately 21.921 acres and 5 common areas on approximately 4.753 acres located at 3451 Barron Cut-Off Road, generally located south of Barron Cut-Off. Case #PP2016-000015 Sponsors:Tiffany Cousins Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report Application PP Brewster Pointe Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Preliminary Plan for Brewster Pointe consisting of 67 residential lots on approximately 21.921 acres and 5 common areas on approximately 4.753 acres located at 3451 Barron Cut-Off Road, generally located south of Barron Cut-Off. Case #PP2016-000015 College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 4 September 15, 2016 PRELIMINARY PLAN for Brewster Pointe PP2016-000015 SCALE: 67 residential lots on 21.921 and 5 common areas on 4.753 acres. LOCATION: 3451 Barron Cut-Off Road, generally located south of Barron Cut- Off ZONING: GS General Suburban APPLICANT: Trent Thomas, Roundtree Development, Ltd. PROJECT MANAGER: Tiffany Cousins, Staff Planner TCousins@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 4 September 15, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 4 September 15, 2016 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: June 1995 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation A-O renamed R Rural – 2013 R Rural to GS General Suburban - 2016 Site development: COMMENTS Vacant Water: Water service will be provided by College Station Utilities. There is an existing 8-inch water line stub out from Yanworth Lane. Subject tract will need to extend the water main to and through the tract to allow future abutting properties to develop. Subject tract will also need to loop the water main with the water line stub out at Etonbury Ave. Public waterlines and fire flow requirements will be required to comply with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines with Final Plat. Sewer: The subject tract will be served by College Station Utilities for sanitary sewer. There is currently no existing sewer line in the vicinity. Subject tract will need to extend a sewer main to an existing manhole on W.S. Phillips Parkway as shown on the current sewer master plan. The proposed development will be required to comply with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines with Final Plat. Off-site Easements: None required at this time, but will be required at the time of final platting stage for the off-site sewer line extension. Drainage: The subject tract is located in the Spring Creek drainage basin. The proposed development will be required to comply with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. Flood Plain: There is no FEMA regulated floodplain located on the property according to firm panel 48041C0325E, effective date 5/16/2012. Greenways: No greenway dedication is proposed or required. Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks are required for this development along both sides of all streets within the development. Bicycle Connectivity: There will be a bike lane on Brewster Drive when it is constructed and on Barron Cut-Off when widened. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 4 September 15, 2016 Streets: Access to this development will be from Barron Cut-Off and the proposed extension of Brewster Drive. Oversize Request: N/A Parkland Dedication Fees: Parkland dedication fees are $1261 per dwelling unit. Impact Fees: Spring Creek Impact Fee Area, $144.01 per Living Unit Equivalent. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance. 2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations as they apply in the City Limits. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Copy of Preliminary Plan FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CITY OF CouiiGE STATION Home of Texas A~M University’ CASE NO.:________________ DATE SUBMITTED:________________ TIME: STAFF: PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION Date of Optional Preapplication Conference N/A NAME OF PROJECT Brewster Pointe Subdivision ADDRESS 3387 Barron Cut Off Road SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: Barron Cut Off Road between WS.Phillips Parkway and FM 2154.Property extends to Castlegate II Subdivision APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Trent Thomas E-mail thornastrent6l4©grnail.corn Street Address 1110 12th Man Circle City College Station Phone Number 979.204.6305 State TX Fax Number Zip Code 77845 PROPERTY OWNER’S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified.Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Rountree Development,Ltd E-mail thornastrent614~gmail.corn Street Address 1110 12th Man Circle City College Station Phone Number 979.690.7117 State TX Fax Number Zip Code 77845 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER’S INFORMATION: Name Joe Schultz,P.E.E-mail /oe~schultzeng.corn Street Address 911 Southwest Parkway East City College Station Phone Number 9797643900 State TX Zip Code 77840 Fax Number 9797643910 MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: $932 Preliminary Plan Application Fee. $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Copy of plan.A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval. ~Title report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90) days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens, encumbrances,etc. ~Impact study (if oversized participation is requested). E~1 The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 6 Total Acreage 21.924 Total No.of Lots 71 R-O-W Acreage 5.941 Number of Lots By Zoning District 71 /R I I Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: O.178~R /,,________ Floodplain Acreage N/A NOTE:Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be considered complete. Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land? No Are you proposing to fl develop the park ~j dedicate the development fee?(Check one) This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? ~Yes flNo If yes,provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: City Project Number (if known): Date I Timeframe when submitted: Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 6 Regarding the waiver request,explain how: 1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,or welfare,or injurious to other property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4 The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1.~An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way: 2.~The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative,or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City’s comprehensive Plan; 3.E1 A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12)months; 4.LI Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate I rural context; 5.fl When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle,Pedestrian,and Greenways Master Plan: Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 6 6.~The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or 7.fl The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification,in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf.LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. ________________7 Signature and title Date Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 6 PRELIMINARY PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Drawn on 24”x 36’sheet to scale of 100’per inch or larger.Include the words ‘PRELIMINARY PLAN - NOT FOR RECORD”in letters 1/2”high.If more than I sheet,an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits.No scale required but include north arrow. Title Block with the following information: Name and address of subdivider,recorded owner,engineer and surveyor. ~Proposed name of subdivision (subdivision name &street names will be approved through Brazos County 911). ~Date of preparation (including the date the plat was submitted and the dates of any revisions on the plat). ~Engineer’s scale in feet. ~Total area intended to be developed. North Arrow. ~Location of current city limit lines and current zoning district boundary.The appropriate zoning district(s) must be in place for the proposed land uses before the application for a subdivision. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.Boundary must include all of parent tract. Descriptions by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within accepted land survey standards.(Labeled on boundary lines,not separate metes and bounds description.) ~Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control point,to which ,later,all dimensions, angles,bearings,block numbers,and similar data shall be referred.The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the survey or tract,or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. ~Name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous parcels of unsubdivided land,and an indication whether or not contiguous properties are platted. ~Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and Floodway,if applicable,according to the most recent available data. ~j Topographic information,including contours at two foot (2 ft.)intervals,wooded areas,and flowline elevation of streams. ~Proposed land uses (in compliance with existing zoning district). The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii,area, center angle,degree of curvature,tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision,as well as,those within the subdivision). Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 6 Existing Proposed Streets.Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac,stubbed out streets must end into a temp.turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. ~Public and private R.O.W.locations and widths.(All existing and proposed ROW’s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. Alleys. Well site locations. ~Pipelines.If carrying flammable gas or fuel,also show size of line,design pressure and product transported through the line. ~Utility services (water &sanitary sewer).All existing and proposed utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas. ~1 Easements. ~Drainage structures and improvements including underground storm sewer and all overland systems (flow line of existing watercourses)and showing where these will discharge. Proposed channel cross sections,if any. ~A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially). ~Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages.All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. Greenways dedication. ~Public areas. ~Other public improvements,including but not limited to parks,schools and other public facilities. ~Proposed phasing.Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements and infrastructure costs shown to be distributed evenly throughout the subdivision.Phases must be final platted in sequential order as shown or defined on the preliminary plan. D Are there impact fees associated with this development?~Yes ~No Revised 5/15 ~Page 6 of 6 City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:216-0561 Name:Traditions Phase 101 Final Plat Status:Type:Final Plat Agenda Ready File created:In control:9/1/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Traditions Phase 101 consisting of two lots and common area on approximately 22 acres, generally located south of the intersection of HSC Parkway and South Traditions Drive. Case #FPCO2016-000015 Sponsors:Jessica Bullock Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report Application Final Plat Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Traditions Phase 101 consisting of two lots and common area on approximately 22 acres, generally located south of the intersection of HSC Parkway and South Traditions Drive. Case #FPCO2016-000015 College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3 September 15, 2016 FINAL PLAT for Traditions Subdivision Phase 101 FPCO2016-000015 SCALE: Two lots and common area on approximately 22 acres LOCATION: Generally located south of the intersection of HSC Parkway and South Traditions Drive. ZONING: BioCorridor Planned Development District APPLICANT: Casey Sandlin, Bryan Traditions, LP PROJECT MANAGER: Jessica Bullock, Senior Planner jbullock@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 3 September 15, 2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3 September 15, 2016 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: June 1995 Zoning: R Rural upon annexation BioCorridor Planned Development District (2012) Preliminary Plan: Approved June 2016 with waivers to block length, block perimeter, and access ways. Site development: Vacant COMMENTS Greenways: The BioCorridor Greenway borders the western boundary of the Final Plat. The Greenway was included in the Traditions Phase 23 Final Plat. This plat dedicates an additional access easement for a future multi-use path. Pedestrian Connectivity: A 10-foot multi-use path currently exists along HSC Parkway. The Final Plat provides six-foot sidewalks on both sides South Traditions Drive. A pedestrian trail will also be provided from South Traditions Drive to the Greenway. Bicycle Connectivity: Bike lanes are proposed to be provided and striped along South Traditions Drive connecting to the multi-use trail on HSC Parkway. Streets: Though not on the Thoroughfare Plan, South Traditions Drive is proposed to be extended as a Major Collector from HSC Parkway to Turkey Creek Road. Parkland Dedication Fees: N/A Impact Fees: N/A REVIEW CRITERIA Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with the Preliminary Plan and the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the BioCorridor Planned Development District Ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Final Plat FOR OFFICE USE ONLY FINAL PLAT APPLICATION CASE NO.:________________ DATE SUBMITTED:_______________ TIME: Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference NAME OF PROJECT The Traditions Subdivision Phase 101 ADDRESS 002601-0063-0010 SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT: Corner of South Traditions Drive and HSC Parkway APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name B,yan Traditions,LP -Casey Sand/in E-mail cSafldlifl@traditioflSrea!eState.corn Street Address 2100 Traditions Blvd City Biyan Phone Number 979.704.6395 State Texas Fax Number Zip Code 77807 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexasA&M Univerd~ (Check one) STAFF: j1 Minor ($700) Amending ($700) Is this plat in the ETJ?~Yes E No Final ($932) Vacating ($932) MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Is this plat Commercial ~or Residential LI LjReplat ($932) $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above). ~$233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). ~$600 (minimum) Development Permit Application /Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 1%of acceptable Engineer’s Estimate for public infrastructure,$600 minimum (if fee is>$600, the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and’ may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. Copy of plat.(A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.) Grading,drainage,and erosion control plan with supporting drainage report. Public infrastructure plan and supporting documents (if applicable). Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). Title report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90)days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens, encumbrances,etc. ~The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. NOTE:A paid tax certificates from City of College Station,Brazos County and College Station LS.D.will be due at the time of the mylar submittal prior to filing the plat. Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 9 PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION (All owners must be identified.Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Biyan Commerce &Development,inc.E-mail IguThdi@brvantx.gov Street Address P.O.Box 1000 City Biyan State Texas Zip Code 77805 Phone Number 979.209.5130 Fax Number _______________________________ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER’S INFORMATION: Name Schultz Engineering,LLC -Joe Schultz,RE.E-mail eng©schuitzeng.com Street Address 911 Southwest Parkway East City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840 Phone Number 979.7643900 Fax Number 979.7643910 Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property?~Yes ~No Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property?If so1 please provide the Volume__________and Page No.______ TotalAcreage 21.687 Total No.of Lots 2 R-O-W Acreage 1.4l8Acre Existing Use Vacant Proposed Use BioCorridor PDD Number of Lots By Zoning District 2 /PDD _______I ______________I _______ Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: I ________/____ ____I ________/____ Floodplain Acreage N/A Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels)on the property?Li Yes j~j No This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance.Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? j~J Yes flNo If yes,provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name:Atlas College Station Preliminary Plan City Project Number (if known):PP2016-000006 Date /Timeframe when submitted:2016 Revised 5115 Page 2 of 9 A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable): ~V/A Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): WA Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. fl/A 2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. F/A 3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,or injurious to other property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. V/A Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1.fl An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2.fl The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative,or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City’s comprehensive Plan; 3.LI A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk.Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12)months; 4.fl Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate / rural context; 5.fl When a sidewalk is required aTong a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle,Pedestrian,and Greenways Master Plan; 4.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 9 City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-0552 Name:Williams Creek Lake Estates Ph. 1 - Final Plat Status:Type:Final Plat Agenda Ready File created:In control:8/30/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Williams Creek Lake Estates Ph. 1 consisting of 29 single-family lots and 3 common areas on approximately 36 acres located at 2442 Carll Lane, generally located northwest of the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and Rock Prairie Road East. Case #FP2015-000012 Sponsors:Madison Thomas Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report Application Final Plat Ph. 1 Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Williams Creek Lake Estates Ph. 1 consisting of 29 single-family lots and 3 common areas on approximately 36 acres located at 2442 Carll Lane, generally located northwest of the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and Rock Prairie Road East. Case #FP2015-000012 College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3 September 16, 2016 FINAL PLAT for Williams Creek Lake Estates Ph.1 FP2015-000012 SCALE: 29 lots and 3 common areas on approximately 36 acres LOCATION: 2242 Carll Lane, being generally located northwest of the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and Rock Prairie Road East ZONING: E Estate, cluster subdivision APPLICANT: Joe Johnson PROJECT MANAGER: Madison Thomas, Staff Planner mthomas@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 3 September 16, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3 September 16, 2016 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1983 (Rock Prairie Road frontage), 2002 (remainder of tract) Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (upon annexation) A-O Agricultural Open renamed R Rural (2013) R Rural to E Estate (2014) Preliminary Plan: 2014, 2015 Site Development: Primarily vacant with a cell tower and an existing manmade pond COMMENTS Parkland Dedication: Parkland Dedication fees totaling $1,261 per lot will be required. Greenways: None are provided or required. Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks are not required within the development as the streets are being constructed to rural sections. Sidewalks are required along Rock Prairie Road. Bicycle Connectivity: Rock Prairie Road is anticipated to have bike lanes when it is widened at an unknown time in the future. Impact Fees: N/A REVIEW CRITERIA Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with the Preliminary Plan and the Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Copy of Final Plat FINAL PLAT APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.:________________ DATE SUBMITTED:_______________ TIME: STAFF: Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference 6-1 1-14 NAME OF PROJECT Williams Creek Lake Estates ADDRESS 2242 Car/I Ln College Station,Tx 77845 SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT: [~2oo’Northwest of the intersection of William D Fitch Parkway and Rock Prairie Road East APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Joe Johnson E-mail joejohnsonl889@hotmall corn Street Address P.O.Box 800 City Coleman Phone Number 9792290310 State T)( Fax Number 325-357-4414 Zip Code 76834 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texa~Ad~M Universi~’/ (Check one)El Minor ($700) El Amending ($700) Is this plat in the ETJ?El Yes ~j No Final ($932)El Vacating ($932) Is this plat Commercial El or Residential ~ El Replat ($932) MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: f~J $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above). $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). ~$600 (minimum)Development Permit Application I Public lnfrastwcture Review and Inspection Fee.Fee is 1%of acceptable Engineer’s Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is>$600,the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). ~Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. Copy of plat.(A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.) Grading, drainage,and erosion control plan with supporting drainage report. Public infrastructure plan and supporting documents (if applicable). Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). Title report for property current within ninety (90)days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90)days.The report must include applicable information such as ownership,liens, encumbrances,etc. ~Paid tax certificates from City of College Station,Brazos County and College Station l.S.D. ~j The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. NOTE:A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered complete.If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application,it shall be considered a submittal for the preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such.Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff to be correct,the final plat application will be considered incomplete. Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 9 PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Williams Creek Lake Estates,Inc.a Texas Corp.E-mail IoeJohnsonl8B9@hotmall.com Street Address P.O.Box 800 City Coleman State Texas Zip Code 76834 Phone Number 979-229-0310 Fax Number 325-357-4414 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER’S INFORMATION: Name Schultz Engineering,LLC.-Joe Schultz,P.E.E-mail I0eschultz84@veriz0fl.net Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive,Suite A City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979-764-3900 Fax Number 979-764-3910 Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property?~Yes ~No Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property?If so,please provide the Volume__________and Page No._______ Total Acreage 36.090 Total No.of Lots 29 R-O-W Acreage 4.954 Existing Use Vacant Proposed Use Residential Number of Lots By Zoning District E /29 I /_______ Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: E ~0.571 ___/______/___ ______ Floodplain Acreage N/A Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels)on the property?~Yes fl No This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance.Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? ~Yes flNo If yes,provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name:Williams Creek Lake Estates (PP) City Project Number (if known):14-00900280 Date!Timeframe when submitted:11/14/2015 Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 9 A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable): FA Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): F/A Regarding the waiver request,explain how: 1.There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 3.The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,or welfare,or injurious to other property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4.The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1.fl An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2.~The presence of unique or unusual topographic,vegetative,or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City’s comprehensive Plan; 3.~A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk.Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12)months; 4.J Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate I rural context; 5.~When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle,Pedestrian,and Greenways Master Plan; Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 9 6.c:i The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or 7.fl The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification,in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE:A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission. Requested Oversize Participation_________________________________________________________________________ Total Linear Footage of Parkiand Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: Proposed Public: ACREAGE:3100_Streets _______No.of acres to be dedicated +$_________development fee3425Sidewalks _______No.of acres in floodplain5918_Sanitary Sewer Lines _______No.of acres in detention5750_Water Lines No.of acres in greenways1549Channels OR728Storm Sewers FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:N/A Bike Lanes / Paths ______No.of SF Dwelling Units X $______=$ __________(date)Approved by Parks &Recreation Advisory Board NOTE:DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,correct,and complete.IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner.If there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney.If the owner is a company,the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company’s representative to sign the application on its behalf.LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. _________6-/5~/c ig ature and title (,)LI /Date C~h€7~J44J)1~,)≤~)i’~Joic)~sty~ Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 9 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner bertification: 1.No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2.The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3.If revoked,all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4.Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5.The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6.Other permits may be required to fulfill local,state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOl and SWPPP. 7.If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre pour)and post construction. 8.Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9.If,stormwater mitigation is required,including detention ponds proposed as part of this project,it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10.In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station,measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction,erosion,and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets,or existing drainage facilities.All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11.The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications,and Standard Details. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12.Release of plans to __________________________________(name or firm)is authorized for bidding purposes only.I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13.I,THE OWNER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE, AND ACCURATE. P~erty Owner(s)ó~,flIA Date Engineer Certification: 1.The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation,including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2.I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local,State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOl and SWPPP.Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES:i.e.,projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3.The information and conclusions plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines.All developme accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and ns. 4.I,THE ENGINEER,AGREE TO I~ATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE,AND IRATE. 6-~/54~ Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 9 The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Required for Site Plans,Final Plats,Construction Plans,Fill I Grading Permits,and Clearing Only Permits :* A.I,_______________________________________certify,as demonstrated in the attached drainage study,that the alterations or development covered by this permit,shall not: (i)increase the Base Flood elevation; (ii)create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii)decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second.This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv)reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances,Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area;nor (v)increase Base Flood velocities. beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. Engineer Date Initial *If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted,provide written justification under separate ~~~~~~letter in lieu of certification. Required for Site Plans,Final Plats,Construction Plans,and Fill I Grading Permits: B.I,_______________________________________,certify to the following: (i)that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm. Engineer Date Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments: C.I,_______________________________________,certify that the construction, improvement,or fill covered by this permit shall not increase the base flood elevation.I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. Engineer Date Revised 5/15 Page 6 of 9 Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate required). Residential Structures: D.I,_______________________________________certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor,including all utilities,ductwork and any basement,at an elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour)and post construction. Engineer I Surveyor Date Commercial Structures: I,_______________________________________,certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any commercial,industrial,or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor,including all utilities,ductwork and basements,elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation Engineer /Surveyor Date OR certify that the structure with its attendant utility,ductwork,basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities,ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all areas below the Base Flood Elevation,and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre pour)and post construction. Engineer!Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: Revised 5115 Page 7 of 9 FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: (Requirements based on field survey andmarked by monuments and markers.) Drawn on 24”x 36”sheet to scale of 100 per inch. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits.No scale required but include north arrow. ~Title Block with the following information: ~Name and address of subdivider,recorded owner,planner,engineer and surveyor. ~Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name &street names will be approved through Brazos County 911.) Date of preparation. Engineer’s scale in feet. Total area intended to be developed. ~j North Arrow. ~Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. ~If more than 1 sheet,an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat. ~Ownership and Dedication ~Surveyor and/or Engineer ~City Engineer (and City Planner,if a minor plat) ~Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat) ~Brazos County Clerk JJ~’Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Flats only) If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created. If using private septic systems,add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner’s Court of Brazos County,pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code. Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available data. Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol)and clearly tied to basic survey data. Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2). The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii,area,center angle,degree of curvature,tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following:(Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision,as well as,those within the subdivision). Existing Proposed Streets.Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac,stubbed out streets must end into a temp turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. Public and private R.O.W,locations and widths.(All existing and proposed RO.W.’s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. Revised 5/15 Page 8 of 9 Existing Proposed i~t~Alleys. Easements. A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially). Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages.All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24”x 36”sheets and properly sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following: ~Street,alley and sidewalk plans,profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall street,alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision.(may be combined with other utilities). Sewer Design Report. Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall sewer layout of the subdivision.(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report. Water line plan showing fire hydrants,valves,etc.with plan and profile lines showing depth and grades.One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) ~Storm drainage system plan with contours,street profile,inlets,storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections.Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5,10,25,50 and 100 year rain intensity.Detailed drainage structure design, channel lining design &detention if used,One sheet must show the overall drainage layout of the subdivision. ~Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E. ~Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee /surety in accordance with UDO Section 8.6. ~Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary. ~Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans). All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed. Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration ~Are there impact fees associated with this developmen~E Yes ~No Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit. Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights~of~way?E Yes ~No If yes,TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents. NOTE:1.We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2.If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOl)must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit. Revised 5/15 Page 9 of 9 City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:316-0542 Name:Northgate Food Truck Court - Conditional Use Permit Status:Type:Rezoning Agenda Ready File created:In control:8/24/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Conditional Use Permit for a Mobile Food Court in NG-1, located at 203 First Street, which is generally located south of Church Avenue and west of First Street. Case #CUP2016-000001 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 13, 2016 City Council meeting - subject to change.) Sponsors:Madison Thomas Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report Site Plan Application Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Conditional Use Permit for a Mobile Food Court in NG-1, located at 203 First Street, which is generally located south of Church Avenue and west of First Street. Case #CUP2016-000001 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 13, 2016 City Council meeting - subject to change.) College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 1 of 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR Northgate Food Truck Court CUP2016-000001 REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan for a long-term mobile food court SCALE: Approximately 0.418 acres LOCATION: 203 First Street APPLICANT: Matt Abegglen PROJECT MANAGER: Madison Thomas, Staff Planner mthomas@cstx.gov BACKGROUND: Currently undeveloped property RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan with the requested setback, parking, and fire lane amendments. Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 2 of 5 Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 3 of 5 Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 4 of 5 NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 15, 2016 Advertised Council Hearing Date: October 13, 2016 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Property owner notices mailed: 20 Contacts in support: 0 Contacts in opposition: 0 Inquiry contacts: 0 ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Urban Mixed Use, Redevelopment Area NG-1 Core Northgate Undeveloped, Commercial South Urban Mixed Use, Redevelopment Area NG-1 Core Northgate Undeveloped East (across First St.) Urban Mixed Use, Redevelopment Area NG-1 Core Northgate Commercial parking lot West (Wellborn Rd.) Urban Mixed Use, Redevelopment Area NG-1 Core Northgate On Ramp to Wellborn Road DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1939 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (upon annexation) C-1 General Commercial (1973) NG-1 Historic Northgate (1996) NG-1 Historic Northgate renamed NG-1 Core Northgate (2003) Final Plat: July 1939 Site development: Undeveloped REVIEW CRITERIA 1. The proposed use shall meet the purpose and intent of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and meet all minimum standards for this type of use per the UDO. The applicant is proposing to turn approximately 0.42 acres of an undeveloped lot into a long-term mobile food court in the NG-1 Core Northgate zoning district. Long-term Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 5 of 5 mobile food courts are intended to have more permanency then those that are short- term, and are held to the same development standards as restaurant developments, with some exceptions based upon the nature of the use and flexibility built into their consideration via the conditional use permitting process. Long-term mobile food courts may allow for:  The establishment of a site that provides for the gathering of two (2) or more mobile food vendors.  The mobile food vendors within the mobile food court to remain on their pad sites overnight. Note: Mobile food vendors are required to leave the mobile food court or move within the court at least once a year to retain mobile food vendor status.  Mobile food vendors to access potable water and sewage disposal facilities onsite.  Tables, chairs, and canopies or enclosed seating areas for court customers.  Signage for the mobile food court, in accordance with the Signs section of this Unified Development Ordinance.  Small-scale entertainment and accessory uses for mobile food court customers, such as music (live acoustic or recorded) that is played or broadcast at a reasonable volume inside the court's property boundaries and small playground area as not to disturb surrounding property owners.  Larger-scale entertainment and accessory uses for court customers, such as a volleyball court and bar, at a scale as not to disturb surrounding property owners.  Accessory structures.  Alcohol sales with approved permits and licenses from the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission. The site plan that has been submitted for this conditional use provides pad sites for up to nine mobile food vendors and a permanent concession/restroom building. Water, sewer, and electric is proposed to be available to each pad site. A 3,200 sq.ft. pavilion is proposed at the center of the site with seating for approximately 200-300 people and a 150 sq.ft. stage is proposed for customer entertainment. An 8-ft. solid wood screening fence is proposed to surround the property on all sides with the exception of First Street, which will have a 6-ft. wrought iron fence to provide for visibility from the entry street side. Alcohol sales through the concession/restroom building are proposed with this use. At approximately 350 feet, the distance of the site to the closest church (the Christian Science Reading Room) exceeds that required for alcohol sales (300 feet). The minimum distance would be confirmed through the processing of a permit for alcohol sales. NG-1 Core Northgate regulations will allow for attached signage, which will be permitted separately. A long-term mobile food court is required to:  Be located a minimum of 100 feet from a single family, duplex, or townhouse zoning district.  Have a site manager that will remain on property during the hours of operation.  Have all valid permits and licenses as required by the Brazos County Health Department. Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 6 of 5  Allow only mobile food vendors that hold valid permits and licenses as required by the City of College Station and the Brazos County Health Department to operate within the mobile food court.  At a minimum, not operate between the hours of 3 a.m. and 5 a.m.  Comply with general site plan requirements Being within an urban, mixed use district, this use will be in close proximity to residential units, but will exceed the minimum distance from a single family or duplex zoning district. At this time, the applicant anticipates having 5-10 employees. The hours of operation are proposed for the full extent allowed (5 a.m. to 3 a.m.), but individual truck hours may vary. Specific use standards apply to site plans for mobile food courts, and the proposed site plan meets all of the requirements with the following exceptions:  Mobile food vendor pad sites and dining areas shall be setback a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from rights-of-way and public ways.  All mobile food vendor pad sites shall be separated from other pad sites, dining areas, and structures by a minimum of ten (10) feet.  A minimum of two (2) Off-Street Parking spaces shall be provided per mobile food vendor pad site.  A minimum of a twenty-foot (20') fire apparatus access route is required around a mobile food court The Northgate Districts are unique from other zoning districts in College Station in many ways, and thus several of the requests to vary from some specific use standards are being made to more closely align with Northgate standards. Northgate has a maximum front setback instead of a minimum to help maximize land utility an d to engage pedestrians as they move along the street. This being the case, the applicant has proposed to move the first truck pad sites and the edge of the pavilion to within 20 feet from back of curb, which is consistent with outdoor dining setbacks in NG-1. The applicant has requested that mobile food vendor pad sites be allowed to be within seven feet of the pavilion instead of 10 feet because of site constraints. No parking is being proposed as commercial developments in Northgate do not have a minimum parking requirement. Adequate fire protection is available from the right-of-way so fire lanes are not needed onsite. Typically a fire lane is also needed for sanitation trucks, but like other businesses in Northgate, the mobile food courts plans to utilize the shared sanitation collection facility. 2. The proposed use shall be consistent with the development policies and goals and objectives as embodied in the Comprehensive Plan for development in the City. The subject tract is shown on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Urban Mixed Use which allows for residential, commercial, and office uses in vertical mixed-use structures. The subject property is also designated by the Comprehensive Plan as a Redevelopment Area. These areas are identified as anticipating a change in land use, and, if appropriate, character to help it evolve into a more dense area with mixed-use activity. A Mobile Food Court use is an appropriate use in the NG-1 Core Northgate Zoning District. This zoning district is currently mainly composed of high density residential developments and commercial and bar businesses. The mobile food court is a unique use that will provide both food and alcoholic beverage options to the surrounding residents, but also entertainment. They will operate evening hours as most Northgate Businesses do, but will Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 7 of 5 also be open for breakfast and lunch hours. They have designed their site to meet the unique characteristics of the Northgate District, buy focusing on pedestrian traffic within their site and working to create an inviting atmosphere. 3. The proposed use shall not be detrimental to the health, welfare, or safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants, not be substantially or permanently injurious to neighboring property. This use will likely not be detrimental or substantially injurious to the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants. The use of the food truck park will create a safe area for the congregation of food truck customers. The proposed food court’s site layout allows for pedestrian traffic only, reducing the potential conflicts of pedestrian traffic and vehicular traffic within this site. They will meet all safety regulations associated with TABC and the selling of alcoholic beverages including providing fencing around the site to create a controlled environment. The court proposes on-site entertainment but will not allow noise level to be detectible beyond the property. The site also agrees to meet business hours set in the Unified Development Ordinance for Mobile Food Courts and provide an on-site manager to ensure the safety of the business operations and customers. 4. The proposed site plan and circulation plan shall be harmonious with the character of the surrounding area. The Unified Development Ordinance speaks to the long-term food court as a more permanent food court that should be held to the same development standards as restaurants with the exceptions identified in the ordinance. The applicant is providing elements such as pad sites for nine trucks, seating areas, a pavilion, and a stage for entertainment. They will also provide the required permanent restroom facilities and hand washing stations required by the Unified Development Ordinance and Brazos Health Department. Each food truck pad site will provide an electrical, water and wastewater hook-up. The applicant is proposing to meet all ordinance regulations with the exceptions that were noted above that would bring the site closer to the development pattern of Northgate. 5. The proposed use shall not negatively impact existing uses in the area or in the City through impacts on public infrastructure such as roads, parking facilities, electrical, or water and sewer systems, or on public services such as police and fire protection, solid waste collection, or the ability of existing infrastructure and services to adequately provide services. This use will not negatively impact public infrastructure or services. This use will be in an undeveloped lot zoned NG-1 Core Northgate. The undeveloped lot is proposed to be developed into a mobile food court which the property can adequately support with existing public utilities: electric, water and sanitary sewer. This site is designed for pedestrian traffic only and will meet Northgate Parking Standards. Adequate fire protection is available and acceptable road access is currently in place for police protection. The applicant has proposed roll-out solid sanitation collection which will then be taken to a nearby shared sanitation collection station. City of College Station Sanitation Department has approved of the proposed collection method. The applicant has nominated the use of a shared commercial grease trap design for the operation of participating food trucks. Food trucks will be allowed to dispose of grease drippings on site through this system. As this component is not required of the site but a chosen option, the proposed grease trap will act a primary grease barrier before fluids enter into the sanitary sewer system. The Police Department has concerns for when large events are held at the food truck court. Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 8 of 5 The ordinance does not require the court to provide any type of security for events, but PD has suggested that they provide security during the events and past closing time to ensure the patrons safely clear the area. 6. The proposed use shall not negatively impact existing uses in the area or in the City. Existing uses in the area include commercial and multi-family. The use of a food truck park will merge with existing commercial establishments such as restaurants and bars. This site provides an outdoor dining experience similar to other Northgate Outdoor Dining options. There are already food trucks that sell within the Northgate Area, and this site will be providing a place for some to sell together in a more cohesive site. This food court will serve the nearby residents and is within walking distance of most Northgate area residents, Texas A&M University students and visitors in the area. The addition of this use will not negatively impact existing uses. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan with the requested setback, parking, and fire lane amendments. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Site Map City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:416-0570 Name:Summit Crossing Phase 3 Status:Type:Rezoning Agenda Ready File created:In control:9/2/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District to T Townhouse for approximately 14.636 acres being J.W. Scott Survey, Tract 29, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, Recorded in Volume 7541, Page 214 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, generally located north of Harvey Road and west of FM 158.Case #REZ2016-000025 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 13, 2016 City Council meeting - subject to change) Sponsors:Rachel Lazo Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report Application Rezoning Map Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District to T Townhouse for approximately 14.636 acres being J.W. Scott Survey, Tract 29, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, Recorded in Volume 7541, Page 214 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, generally located north of Harvey Road and west of FM 158.Case #REZ2016-000025 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 13, 2016 City Council meeting - subject to change) College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 5 September 15, 2016 REZONING REQUEST for Summit Crossing Phase 3 REZ2016-000025 REQUEST: PDD Planned Development District to T Townhouse SCALE: 14.636 acres LOCATION: J.W. Scott Survey, Tract 29, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, Recorded In Volume 7541, Page 214 Of The Deed Records Of Brazos County, Texas, Generally Located North Of Harvey Road And West Of FM 158. APPLICANT: Rabon Metcalf, RME Consulting PROJECT MANAGER: Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner rlazo@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 5 September 15, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 5 September 15, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 5 September 15, 2016 NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 15, 2016 Advertised Council Hearing Date: October 13, 2016 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Summit Crossing Property owner notices mailed: 19 Contacts in support: One at the time of staff report. Contacts in opposition: None at the time of staff report. Inquiry contacts: One at the time of staff report. ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Urban R Rural & PDD Planned Development District Undeveloped South (Across Harvey Road) Suburban Commercial R Rural & O Office Undeveloped East Urban PDD Planned Development District Undeveloped West Urban PDD Planned Development District Townhomes DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: September 1980 Zoning: Properties zoned A-O Agricultural Open upon Annexation 2003 – 105.834 acre tract zoned PDD Planned Development District with duplexes as an approved use and the northwest corner of Harvey & FM 158 zoned GC General Commercial Final Plat: N/A – Property is currently unplatted Site development: Vacant PROPOSAL The applicant has requested a T Townhouse rezoning at this location to allow for Phase 3 of the existing Summit Crossing development. Previously, Summit Crossing has developed under a Planned Development District with duplexes as an approved use, then revised the PDD for townhouse uses. Instead of continuing to modify the PDD, the applicant has chosen to request T Townhouse as it would still comply with the Urban land use. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Urban. The Comprehensive Plan states that this designation is for areas that should have very intense level of Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 5 September 15, 2016 development consisting of townhomes, duplexes, and high-density apartments. The proposed zoning permits townhomes, allowing the property to be developed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: As this is a continuation of the existing Summit Crossing townhouse development, Townhouse zoning is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of the area and the character of the neighborhood. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The property is suitable for townhouse uses. It has been planned since 2003 for duplex uses where each side is on an individually platted lot to promote individual home ownership. The project has converted to townhomes as it develops. It is greenfield property, moving urban-density residential eastward up Harvey Road. There is no floodplain on the property and it is relatively flat. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property is currently zoned and suitable for PDD with duplexes as an allowed use. The difference between the densities of duplex and townhouse uses are minor—12 units per acre for duplexes versus 14 for townhomes. The property is suitable for either use. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The subject property is marketable with its current zoning of PDD Planned Development District, however, a T Townhouse district simplifies the zoning and future development processes. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water service will be provided by the City of College Station via an existing 12-inch water main located along Harvey Road, and an existing 8-inch water main from the existing Summit Crossing development. The subject tract will have sewer access via an existing 12-inch sanitary sewer line located along Harvey Road. The subject property has frontage on Harvey Road, an existing 2-lane Minor Arterial. Subject tract will have one connection on Harvey Road and to the existing Summit Crossing development. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with the site shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. Existing infrastructure currently appears to have capacity to adequately serve the proposed use. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend approval of the rezoning request. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Rezoning Map City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:516-0569 Name:Tarrow Townhomes Status:Type:Rezoning Agenda Ready File created:In control:9/2/2016 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda:Final action:9/15/2016 Title:Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from O Office to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 1.66 acres being Lot G, Chimney Hill Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, recorded in Volume 3043, Page 204, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, generally located at the intersection of Tarrow Street and Autumn Circle. Case REZ2016-000027 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 13, 2016 City Council meeting - subject to change) Sponsors:Rachel Lazo Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report Application Rezoning Map Concept Plan Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from O Office to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 1.66 acres being Lot G, Chimney Hill Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, recorded in Volume 3043, Page 204, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, generally located at the intersection of Tarrow Street and Autumn Circle. Case REZ2016-000027 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the October 13, 2016 City Council meeting - subject to change) College Station, TX Printed on 9/9/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 1 of 7 REZONING REQUEST FOR Tarrow Townhomes REZ2016-000027 REQUEST: O Office to PDD Planned Development District SCALE: Approximately 1.66 acres LOCATION: Chimney Hill Subdivision, Lot G, generally located west of the intersection of Tarrow Street and Autumn Circle, north of the Chimney Hill Subdivision, and immediately south of the City limit line. APPLICANT: Daniel Beamon PROJECT MANAGER: Rachel Lazo, Staff Planner rlazo@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the PDD Planned Development District zoning request and associated Concept Plan. Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 2 of 7 Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 3 of 7 Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 4 of 7 NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 15, 2016 Advertised Council Hearing Date: October 13, 2016 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Chimney Hill Property owner notices mailed: 22 Contacts in support: One Contacts in opposition: None Inquiry contacts: One ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North City of Bryan City of Bryan Single-Family Residential & Floodplain South Urban T Townhouse Townhouse East (Across Tarrow St) Urban R-4 Multi-Family Multi-Family West Neighborhood Conservation GS General Suburban Single Family DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: March 1956 Zoning: Zoned R-1 General Suburban upon annexation 1979 – Zoned A-P Administrative Professional 2013 – A-P renamed O Office Final Plat: Chimney Hill Subdivision, May 1981 Site development: Vacant REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The property is listed as “Urban” in the Comprehensive Plan, which allows for townhomes, duplexes, and high-density apartments. The proposed PDD Planned Development District zoning uses a base zoning district of T Townhouse to allow for a townhouse development. The rezoning request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 5 of 7 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The surrounding properties are all developed as residential uses. The subject property is compatible with the adjacent townhouse development. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The property has multiple encumbrances, such as the 100-year floodplain along the City limits, an aerial electric easement through the center of the property, and its proximity to multiple established residential developments. The proposed PDD and its modifications would therefore make development of the subject property more probable. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The subject property is currently zoned O Office. Uses permitted in this district include, education facilities, medical clinics, and offices. Located near residential and commercial uses, major thoroughfares, and given the amount of residential property in the area, this property is suitable for these uses. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property is currently zoned O Office and is currently marketable as such. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water service will be provided by the City of College Station via an existing 20-inch water main located along Tarrow Street. The subject tract will have sewer access via an existing 12-inch sewer line that is currently running through the rear PUE, and an existing 6-inch sewer line running through the southern side’s PUE. The subject property is located in the Burton Creek Drainage Basin. The natural conveyance path drains towards the northern tract ultimately to Burton Creek. Detention will not be required with the development due to the City of College watershed timing assessment study done in 2013 that deemed this portion of the creek as “No detention required”. Subject tract has 100-year floodplain according to Firm panel 48041C0215F, dated 4/2/2014. A No Adverse Impact analysis will be required at the time of platting stage to demonstrate that subject tract’s flood plain modification meet Chapter 13 – Flood Hazard Protection of the Code of Ordinances’ requirements. The subject property has frontage on Tarrow street, an existing Minor Arterial, and future 4- lane minor arterial. The subject tract will have one connection on Tarrow Street. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with the site shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. Existing infrastructure appears to currently have capacity to adequately serve the proposed use. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building and parking areas as well as other site related features. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 6 of 7 also request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD Concept Plans: 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. General: The stated purpose and intent of the requested PDD is “to use this property for townhomes, following all rules regarding Townhouse Zoning. A PDD is being pursued in order to eliminate the 20-foot rear setback for townhome lots which would be adjacent to a 38-foot wide floodplain reserve lot.” The Concept Plan proposes a townhouse development that attempts to maximize utilization of the property, while staying out of the floodplain. A separate lot will be created to preserve the existing floodplain and vegetation. Buildings will have a maximum height of 35 feet. Access from Tarrow Street is proposed. Modification Requested: T Townhouse is proposed as the base zoning district with a modification to reduce the rear building setback to zero (0) feet for townhouses adjacent to the floodplain. Community Benefits: The applicant offers the following as community benefits: • Preserved landscaping along Tarrow Street within the common area; • Twenty foot setback as a buffer from existing residential uses ; • Construct a sidewalk along the west side of Tarrow from proposed driveway to intersection or Tarrow and Spring Loop, to provide connectivity as identified in the Bike, Pedestrian, Greenways Plan within the Comprehensive Plan; and • 22 feet right-of-way dedication along Tarrow Street. Planning & Zoning Commission September 15, 2016 Page 7 of 7 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the PDD Planned Development District zoning request and associated Concept Plan with its proposed modifications. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Rezoning Map 3. Concept Plan