Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/03/2015 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionCity College Station, TX 1101 Te aslAve College Station, TX 77840 CITY °fT COLLEGE STATION Meeting Agenda - Final Home ofT vAdM Univemity' Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Workshop Meeting. Thursday, September 3, 2015 5:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers 1. Call the meeting to order. 2. Executive Session will be held in the Administrative Conference Room. Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Code Section 551.071 }; possible action. The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding attorney-client privileged information. Upon occasion the Planning & Zoning Commission may need information from its attorney as to attorney-client privileged information. After executive session, discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. The following subject(s) may be discussed: Legal Advice: a. Legal issues regarding College Station's building plot regulations in relation to platting and replatting in older residential areas. b. Legal Issues regarding rezoning notice requirements. 6:00 P.M. 3. Take action, if any, on Executive Session. 4. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 5. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev 6. 15-0464 Discussion of Minor and Amending plats approved by Staff. Final Plat — Minor— Eastmark Subdivision Phase II Lots 2R -2A and 2R -2B, Block A — Case # FPCO2015-000002 (J. Bullock) 7. 15-0506 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items in the 2015 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached). Sponsors: Schubert Attachments: 2015 P&Z Plan of Work 8. 15-0511 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on Parkland Dedication assessment for multi -family development. Sponsors: Prochazka College Station, TX Page 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - Final September 3, 2015 Workshop Attachments: Staff Memo Parkland Dedication Ordinance Park System Inventory 2015 9. 15-0505 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: Thursday, September 10, 2015— City Council Meeting Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. Thursday, September 17, 2015 — P&Z Meeting Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 10. 15-0517 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: A Rezoning for approximately 2.429 acres generally located between Jane Street and Eisenhower Street from O Office and GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District for the Embassy Suites project. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 6, 2015 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. A Rezoning adding a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay for approximately 32 acres located in the McCulloch Subdivision along Holleman Drive. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 20, 2015 and voted (4-2) to recommend approval with amendments. The City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request as amended by the Commission. A Rezoning for approximately 1.57 acres located at 14015 Renee Lane from R Rural to GS General Suburban. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 6, 2015 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. A Rezoning for approximately 12 acres along State Highway 6 north of Christ Unitied Methodist Church from GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District for the MRC Senior Housing project. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 6, 2015 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. A Rezoning for approximately 28.5 acres located along Holleman Drive South across from the Quail Run Subdivision from R Rural and GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development District for the Aspen Heights multi -family project. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 7, 2015 and voted (4-1) to College Station, TX Page 2 Printed on 8282015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - Final September 3, 2015 Workshop recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on June 25, 2015 and deferred the request to their second August meeting so further traffic analysis could be performed. The Council reconsidered this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (6-1) to approve the request. 11. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board, Joint Annexation Task Force 12. Discussion and possible action on future Member may inquire about a subject for which of specific factual information or the recitation deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to subsequent meeting. 13. Adjourn. agenda items - A Planning & Zoning notice has not been given. A statement of existing policy may be given. Any place the subject on an agenda for a The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. City Manager I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on 20xx at 5:00 p.m. City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 7643517 or (TDD) 1 800 735 2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.gov. Council meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. College Station, TX Page 3 Printed on 8282015 _ College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexivA&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File #: 15-0464 Version: 1 Name: Minor & Amending Plats Type: Updates Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/12/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Discussion of Minor and Amending plats approved by Staff. * Final Plat - Minor- Eastmark Subdivision Phase II Lots 2R -2A and 2R -2B, Block A - Case # FPCO2015-000002 (J. Bullock) Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Date Ver. Action By Action Result Discussion of Minor and Amending plats approved by Staff. * Final Plat — Minor— Eastmark Subdivision Phase II Lots 2R -2A and 2R -2B, Block A — Case # FPCO2015-000002 (J. Bullock) College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM _ College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexivA&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File M 15-0506 Version: 1 Name: 2015 P&Z Plan of Work Update Type: Updates Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/26/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items in the 2015 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached). Sponsors: Jason Schubert Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: 2015 P&Z Plan of Work Date Ver. Action By Action Result Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items in the 2015 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached). College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM �g & Zoning Commission Plan of Work Comprehensive Plan Implementation Implementation of Adopted Plans Summary: Project Dates: Implementation of general items and tasks identified in 3/4/15: Public meeting regarding the design Implementation of adopted master plans and of Langford Street and Guadalupe Drive neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely: sidewalks (South Knoll Area Plan). Central College Station, Eastgate, Southside Area, 3/26/15: Council awarded contract to Freese & Nichols to update the Wastewater Master Wellborn Community, and South Knoll Area neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian & Plan. Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste of a three-year annexation plan. Water, Medical District, and Economic Development 3/26/15: Council approved all -way stop at master plans. Lincoln Avenue and Tarrow Street (warrant 8/28/15: Task Force meeting. study requested by Eastgate Plan). Anticipated Initiation: May 2015 June 2015: Sidewalk constructed along Normand Drive between Rock Prairie Road and Pondersoa Drive (Central College Station Plan). June 2015: Bike lanes on Holleman Drive restriped (Southside and South Knoll Area Plans). July 2015: Sidewalk gap filled on Tarrow Street by Fire Station 6 (Eastgate Plan). 7/9/15: Council approved all -way stop at Walton Drive and Francis Drive (warrant study requested by Eastgate Plan). Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion: On-going Five -Year Comprehensive Plan Report Implementation Summary: Project Dates: Implementation of general items and tasks identified in 5/28/15: Council adopted resolution to create the Five -Year Comprehensive Plan Report. Joint Annexation Task Force. Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka Anticipated Completion: On-going Annexation Task Force Summary: Project Dates: 5/28/15: Council adopted resolution to create Joint Annexation Task Force. Implement the Five -Year Comprehensive Plan Report by creating a task force of elected officials, appointed 6/4/15: P&Z appointed 3 members to Task officials, and staff to update timing and priorities of Force. future annexations including the potential development 6/23/15: Initial Task Force meeting held. of a three-year annexation plan. 7/10/15: Task Force meeting. 8/14/15: Task Force meeting. 8/28/15: Task Force meeting. Staff Assigned: L. Simms Anticipated Initiation: May 2015 Future Land Use and Character Map Assessments Summary: Project Dates: Implement the Five -Year Comprehensive Plan Report Implement the Five -Year Comprehensive Plan Report by evaluating the appropriateness of the existing by maintaining up-to-date percentages of available and Future Land Use and Character designations for five utilized land and evaluating whether all of the City's areas and recommend amendments as necessary. Anticipated Initiation: Fall 2015 Priority will be given to Area A (Wellborn Road near Staff Assigned: M. Bombek Barron Road) and Area B (Greens Prairie Road at 5/7/15: P&Z recommended approval of Greens Prairie Trail). proposed ordinance. Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka Anticipated Initiation: Summer 2015 Harvey Mitchell District Plan Summary: Project Dates: Implement the Five -Year Comprehensive Plan Report Implement the Five -Year Comprehensive Plan Report by initiating the Harvey Mitchell District Plan as by maintaining up-to-date percentages of available and identified in the Comprehensive Plan. utilized land and evaluating whether all of the City's Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka Anticipated Initiation: Fall 2015 Land Use Inventory/Housing Needs Summary: Summary: Project Dates: Implement the Five -Year Comprehensive Plan Report Implement the Five -Year Comprehensive Plan Report by maintaining up-to-date percentages of available and by revising the existing non-residential architectural utilized land and evaluating whether all of the City's requirements to reflect current practices and allow future housing needs are being met. more flexibility in design. Staff Assigned: M. Bombek Anticipated Initiation: Summer 2015 Non -Residential Architectural Standards Summary: Project Dates: April 2015: Public comment period of draft Implement the Five -Year Comprehensive Plan Report ordinance. by revising the existing non-residential architectural 5/4/15: BPG Advisory Board recommended requirements to reflect current practices and allow approval with minor changes. more flexibility in design. 5/7/15: P&Z recommended approval of proposed ordinance. 5/28/15: Council adopted proposed ordinance. Staff Assigned: J. Schubert Item Completed: May 2015 Thoroughfare Plan Summary: Project Dates: Implement the Five -Year Comprehensive Plan Report 9/10/14: Entered into contract with Kimley- by updating the Thoroughfare Plan based on new Horn and Associates, Inc to update traffic counts and capacity data and evaluate if Thoroughfare Plan. changes are needed to the existing street section Anticipated Initiation: Summer 2015 standards. Anticipated Completion Fall 2015 Staff Assigned: D. Singh Anticipated Completion Fall 2015 Walton Drive Commercial Overlay Summary: Project Dates: Implement the Eastgate Neighborhood Plan by Receive update on implementation of the plan and its creating a zoning overlay to address parking and other framework for addressing bicycle and pedestrian needs non -conformities for the commercial area at Walton on City-wide and neighborhood scales. Drive and Texas Avenue. Anticipated Initiation: Summer 2015 Staff Assigned: J. Schubert Anticipated Completion Fall 2015 Wellborn Zoning Districts Summary: Project Dates: Implement the Wellborn Community Plan by creating Receive update on implementation of the plan and its new or modified zoning districts as described in the framework for addressing bicycle and pedestrian needs Plan. on City-wide and neighborhood scales. Staff Assigned: J. Bullock Anticipated Initiation: Summer 2015 Research, Education, and Other Items Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan Update Summary: Project Dates: Receive update on implementation of the plan and its Plan and consider potential implications of any future framework for addressing bicycle and pedestrian needs plans for expansion. on City-wide and neighborhood scales. Staff Assigned: M. Hitchcock Staff Assigned: V. Garza Anticipated Completion: Summer 2015 Easterwood Airport Master Plan Summary: Project Dates: Receive a report on the Easterwood Airport Master Plan and consider potential implications of any future plans for expansion. Staff Assigned: M. Hitchcock Anticipated Completion: May 2015 Economic Development Master Plan Update Summary: Project Dates: Receive an update regarding the components of the 4/16/15: Update provided at P&Z Workshop. Economic Development Master Plan and its 9/3/15: Discussion at P&Z Workshop. implementation. Anticipated Completion: Summer 2015 Staff Assigned: N. Ruiz Item Completed: April 2015 Parkland Dedication Basis Summary: Project Dates: Receive an update regarding the tracking and timing of 7/16/15: Discussion at P&Z Workshop. Discuss possibilities of revising parkland dedication 9/3/15: Discussion at P&Z Workshop. requirements to be based on a per bedroom basis Anticipated Completion: Summer 2015 instead of per dwelling unit. Item Completed: June 2015 Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka/Legal Staff Anticipated Completion: Summer 2015 Parkland Dedication Funds Summary: Project Dates: Receive an update regarding the tracking and timing of 7/2/15: Update provided at P&Z Workshop. expenditures in the various park zones. Staff Assigned: Parks & Recreation Staff Anticipated Completion: Summer 2015 Planning & Development Services Organization I Review Summary: Project Dates: Review progress of implementation of the report that 7/2/15: Update provided at P&Z Workshop. included policy discussions, ordinance revisions, and process and service improvements. Staff Assigned: L. Simms Item Completed: June 2015 Review of Adopted Plans Summary: Project Dates: After action review of adopted planning areas, specifically Northgate, BioCorridor, and Medical Districts. Staff Assigned: P&DS/Economic Development Staff Anticipated Initiation: Fall 2015 University Research Commercialization Summary: Project Dates: Receive information regarding the vision and implementation of the commercialization of research - related output, including examples of successful efforts elsewhere. Staff Assigned: City Staff Anticipated Completion: Winter 2015 _ College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexivA&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File #: 15-0511 Version: 1 Name: Multi -Family Parkland Workshop Item Multi -Family Parkland Discussion Type: Presentation Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/26/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on Parkland Dedication assessment for multi -family development. Sponsors: Jennifer Prochazka Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Staff Memo Parkland Dedication Ordinance Park System Inventory 2015 Date Ver. Action By Action Result Presentation, possible action, and discussion on Parkland Dedication assessment for multi -family development. College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM CITY OF COLLEGE STATION TexasAe3M University' MEMORANDUM September 3, 2015 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: Multi -Family Parkland Dedication Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on Parkland Dedication assessment for multi -family development. Summary: This Workshop item was identified by the Planning & Zoning Commission in their 2015 Plan of Work and is an opportunity to discuss the possibility of revising parkland dedication assessments to a per bedroom basis instead of per dwelling unit. The purpose of this item is to receive direction on a possible ordinance amendment. Staff presented preliminary information to the Planning & Zoning Commission at their July 16, 2015 Workshop meeting regarding assessment of multi -family parkland dedication fees. At the request of the Planning & Zoning Commission, this additional Workshop item was scheduled for staff to present general parkland dedication information and a comparison of existing by -the -dwelling unit multi -family parkland fees and potential by -the -bedroom fees. Background: Parkland funds are generated through residential development activities in the City. Funds are collected for the acquisition and development of parkland to ensure that park and recreation needs associated with new development can be met without diminishing the levels of service available to existing residents. These funds are generally used to acquire new parkland, develop new parks, and to enhance existing parks. Currently, parkland dedication fees are assessed based on the number of dwelling units in a multi -family project, regardless of the total number of bedrooms. During the development of the multi -family zoning districts, development community stakeholders identified several potential ordinance amendments aimed at "leveling the playing field" for multi -family developments, including parkland dedication assessment on a per bedroom basis. More recently, the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board initiated a similar discussion in response to recent multi -family development trends in College Station that tend toward more residents per dwelling unit. Attachments: Parkland Dedication Summary Parkland Dedication Ordinance History Community and Neighborhood Park Zone Map 2009 Parkland Dedication Ordinance 2012 Parkland Dedication Calculations Neighborhood Park Cost Estimates Community Park Cost Estimates 2015 Park System Inventory CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKLAND DEDICATION ORDINANCE —SUMMARY The Parkland Dedication Ordinance provides a means to acquire and develop neighborhood and community parks in the City and ETJ. The funds for these park land acquisition and developments are generated by the construction of new residential subdivisions and must be used for park acquisition and/or park development or re -development within a defined service area as defined by the City's approved Park Zones. There are 29 Neighborhood Park Zones and 4 Community Park Zones. There is a five year time frame in which funds are to be utilized. As such, funds are spent on a first -in, first -out basis. The Parkland Dedication Ordinance began in 1975 in College Station. Over that period of time, the City has been able to purchase park property, have property given through the ordinance, developed and re- developed parks, and even had subdivision developers build the parks for the City to meet the requirements. The Ordinance divides the requirements into Neighborhood Parks and Community Parks. Each of these categories carries a land or fee in lieu of land requirement and a development fee. The requirements are based upon: • # park acres per 1,000 citizens - 7 acres per 1,000 is the College Station standard (3.5 acres of neighborhood parks and 3.5 acres of community parks; does not include Veteran's Athletic Complex or Lick Creek Park) • Average cost per acre of developable parkland in College Station ($32,000 per acre) • Persons per Household —set by US Census Bureau (2.38 PPH in 2010) • Distinction between Single Family and Multi -Family Dwellings • Cost for development of a typical neighborhood or community park in College Station ($350,000 per neighborhood park and $7,600,000 per community park; Community Park discounted at 50% for Multi -Family and 75% for Single Family) In 2008, as part of the Bond Program, a $1,000,000 Revolving Fund was created to be used for the acquisition of parkland in both the City limits and the ETJ. This fund is then reimbursed for its parkland acquisitions by Parkland Dedication funds collected in the Zones the land is located in. As an example, property was purchased in Northgate (Zone 1 and Zone B) from the revolving fund. As Parkland Dedication fees are collected from developments in Northgate, the Revolving Fund is replenished. These funds then allow us to look at purchasing land in other areas of the community. Following is a short list of parks acquired and developed as well as redeveloped through the use of the Parkland Dedication Ordinance. It is safe to say that the majority of the parks within College Station are a direct result of the ordinance. Parks Donated through Parkland Dedication (last 10 years) Barracks Parks (7) (2013-2015- 3 of 7 parks developer developed) Bridgewood Park (2014) Carter Crossing Park (2006) Castlegate Park(2001-developer developed) Castlerock Park (2005- developer developed) Cove of Nantucket Park (2005) Crescent Pointe Park (2006) Northgate Parks (2007/2009) Phillips Park (2013- developer developed) Reatta Meadows Park (2006) Smith Tract (2010) Sonoma Park (2006) Summit Crossing Park (2008) Wallace Lake Park- (2013 -developer developed) Parkland Dedication Fund Development/Re-Development Projects (FY13 — FY16) FY `13 NorthgatePark: Building demolition Wolf Pen Creek: Electrical improvements Cy Miller Park: Pier replacement Carter Crossing Park: New park development Southwest Park: New park development Woodland Hills Park: park improvements Arboretum: Bridge replacement FY `14 Bee Creek Park: New double arch swing with surfacing; New 2-5 year old discovery cave Parkway Park: New web climber with surfacing Sandstone Park: New exercise stations Thomas Park: New swing set and surfacing FY `15 Castlegate Park: New swing set and surfacing Castlerock Park: New swing set surfacing Universtiy Park: New swing set surfacing Fun for All Playground: New playground area within Central Park Wolf Pen Creek Park: New restrooms at festival site FY `16 Crescent Pointe Park: New park development Reatta Meadows Park: New park development Sonoma Park: New park development Bridgewood Park: New park development Barracks Park: New park development Cy Miller Park: Trash cans and new metal roof on the gazebo Windwood Park: Improvements Edelweiss Park: Improvements Longmire Park: Picnic unit Sandstone Park: Exercise station Southern Oaks Park: Drinking fountain; Picnic units Castlegate Park: Park improvements COLLEGE STATION PARKLAND DEDICATION ORDINANCE HISTORY Effective Date Fee Code Park Type FEES LAND (acres) Ordinance Approved Date SF MF SF MF Park Acq. (Per DU) Park Der. (Per DU) TOTAL Park Acq. (Per DU) ParkNumbers k Der. (Per DU) TOTAL Acres/ per DU Acres/ perDU Neighborhood $274 $362 $636 $274 1 $362 $636 1/117 1/117 20 -Aug -12 Community $250 $375 $625 $250 $750 $1,000 1/128 1/128 TOTAL $524 $737 $1,261 $524 $1,112 $1,636 N6 Neighborhood $314 $764 $1,078 $256 $622 $878 1/102 1/125 31390) 11 Dec - 1 Jan -09 C6 Commurity $305 $638 $943 $248 $520 $768 1/105 1/129 08 TOTAL $619 $1,402 $2,021 $504 $1,142 $1,646 1Jan-08 N5 Neighborhood $245 $655 $900 $198 $533 $731 1/98 1/121 2997(') 13 -Sep - 07 24 -Jul -02 N4 Neighborhood $198 $358 $556 $160 $292 $452 1/101 1/125 2546 24-Jan 02 14 -Jul -99 N3 Neighborhood $148 $309 $457 $112 $233 $345 1/101 1/134 2368 14-Jan 99 13 -Nov -75 N2 Neighborhood $225 $0 $225 $225 $0 $225 1/133 1/133 983 13 -Nov - 75 N1 Neighborhood $150 $0 $150 $150 $0 $150 1/200 1/200 690 (t) Parkland dedication for ETJ development became effective. (2) Community park dedication became effective. A) Parkland dedication fees are vested at the time of the first submission of the platting process. B) Parkland dedication fees are collected at the time of the filing of the final plat for single- family development (process with Final Plat). C) Parkland dedication fees are collected at the time of the Building Permit for multi -family development (process with Site Plan). OZone A OZone B OZone C OZone D O NeighborY CS City Li - Parks O TAMU Streets NORTH Community and Neighborhood Park Zone Map ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9, "SUBDIVISIONS" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY AMENDING SECTION 10, "PARK LAND DEDICATION", BY AMENDING AND ADDING NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY PARK LAND DEDICATION AND DEVELOPMENT FEE REQUIREMENTS, BY CHANGING FLOODPLAIN DEDICATION RATIOS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Chapter 9, "Subdivisions", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That if any provisions of any section of this ordinance shall be held to be void or unconstitutional, such holding shall in no way effect the validity of the remaining provisions or sections of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. PART 3: That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty Five Dollars ($25.00) nor more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. Said Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective January 1, 2009. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this day of 12008. ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED: CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED: MAYOR EXHIBIT "A" That Chapter 9, "Subdivisions", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: 1. By amending SECTION 10: "Requirements for Park Land Dedication" by deleting the entire section and substituting the following: SECTION 10: Requirements For Park Land Dedication and Development. 10-A. Purpose. This section is adopted to provide recreational areas in the form of neighborhood park facilities as well as community park facilities as a function of subdivision and site development in the City of College Station and its Extra -Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). This section is enacted in accordance with the home rule powers of the City of College Station granted under the Texas Constitution, and the statutes of the State of Texas, including, but not by way of limitation, Texas Local Government Code Chapter 212 as may be amended from time to time. It is hereby declared by the City Council that recreational areas in the form of neighborhood parks and community parks are necessary and in the public welfare, and that the only adequate procedure to provide for neighborhood parks and community parks is by integrating such requirements into the procedure for planning and developing property or subdivisions in the City and its ETJ, whether such development consists of new construction on vacant land or rebuilding and remodeling of structures on existing residential property. Neighborhood parks are those parks providing for a variety of outdoor recreational opportunities and located within convenient distances from a majority of the residences to be served thereby located within park zones established by the City. The park zones established by the College Station Parks and Recreation Department and shown on the official Parks and Recreation map for the City of College Station shall be prima facie proof that any park located therein is within such a convenient distance from any residence located therein. The primary cost of neighborhood parks should be borne by the landowners of residential property who, by reason of the proximity of their property to such parks, shall be the primary beneficiaries of such facilities. Typically, the landowner of a proposed residential development is the developer. A typical community park in College Station is designed to serve the needs of residents from several neighborhoods located within a one-half to three mile radius. Community parks provide amenities that should complement neighborhood parks. Together, neighborhood parks and community parks can meet more of the recreational needs of residents. Community parks are generally 25 to 70 acres in size. However, larger and smaller community parks may be developed to meet specific requirements of a particular area of town. Community parks, by their nature, serve both active and passive leisure needs of residents, and use by organizations and individuals from surrounding areas larger than for neighborhood parks. The acquisition and development of the "basic' infrastructure and facilities for the usage of these community parks should be based upon the demand from the area residents it is intended to serve. Therefore, the following requirements are adopted to effect the purposes stated above 10-B Applicability. This section applies to a landowner who develops land for residential use located within the City or within its extraterritorial jurisdiction. 10-C Requirements. 1. General. The City Manager or his designee shall administer this Section with certain review, recommendation and approval authorities being assigned to the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and various city departments as specified herein. Generally, the developer of residential property must address the following requirements pursuant to this section: dedication of land for neighborhood park use or payment of a fee in lieu thereof, dedication of land for community parks or payment of a fee in lieu thereof, payment of a development fee for neighborhood parks or construction of the neighborhood park improvements to which such fee relates, and payment of a development fee for community parks or construction of the community park improvements to which such fee relates. Requirements herein are based on actual dwelling units for an entire development. Increases or decreases in final unit count may require an adjustment in fees paid or land dedicated. If the actual number of dwelling units exceeds the original estimate, additional park land and additional park development fees may be required in accordance with the requirements in this Section. The schedule of fees and required land dedications is attached hereto as Appendix I and incorporated and made a part of this Section for all purposes. The identification of park zones for neighborhood parks is as shown City's Recreation, Park and Open Space Master Plan referenced herein and incorporated by reference. 2. Land Dedication. a. The amount of land to be dedicated for neighborhood park land purposes and for community park purposes shall be as set forth in Appendix I. The total amount of land dedicated for the development shall be dedicated to the City in fee simple: 1) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for multi -family development, 2) Concurrently with the final plat for a single phase development, 3) For a phased development the entire park shall be either platted concurrently with the plat of the first phase of the development or 4) The developer may provide the City with financial security against the future dedication by providing a bond, irrevocable letter of credit, or other alternative financial guarantee such as a cash deposit in the amount equal to the number of acres park land required and in a form acceptable to the City. The amount of the financial guarantee shall be the amount of fee in lieu of land dedication as set forth in Appendix L The financial guarantee will be released to the developer, without interest, upon the filing of the final plat for the subsequent phase that dedicates the required park land. b. For development located within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City, the dedication requirements of this Section may be met through the creation of private park land in the same amount required as set forth in Appendix I provided the developer enters into a written agreement that all such private park land be dedicated to the City at the time of full purpose annexation into the City and provided that any plat related to such development, is inscribed with a notation regarding same. 3. Fee in Lieu of Land. In lieu of dedicating park land for neighborhood parks and for community parks, a developer may request to meet some or all of the neighborhood park land dedication requirements, and some or all of the community park land dedication requirements through payment of a fee in lieu thereof in amounts as set forth in Appendix L Such fees shall be due at the same time as fees are due for final platting or for issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first. 4. City Final Approval. The City shall have the final authority in determining how much, if any, land or fee may be accepted in lieu of required land dedication. The City may, from time to time, require that a fee be submitted in lieu of land dedication in amounts as set forth in Appendix I for either, both, some or all of neighborhood park land or community park land dedication. Likewise, the City may, from time to time, require that land be dedicated in amounts as set for in Appendix I and that no fee in lieu of land will be accepted. 5. Approval Process for park land dedication. a. Land Dedications equal or exceeding five acres, and Dedications of Floodplains and Greenways. For any proposed required neighborhood park land dedication equaling or exceeding five (5) acres of land or equaling or exceeding payment of a fee in lieu thereof, for any proposed required community park land dedication equaling or exceeding five (5) acres of land or equaling or exceeding the payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or for any proposed land dedication containing floodplain or greenway, the landowner must: 1) Obtain a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, and 2) Obtain approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission pursuant to the plat approval procedures as set forth elsewhere in the City Code of Ordinances. i. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board but may make a decision contrary to its recommendation by majority vote. b. Dedications of less than five acres not including floodplains or greenways. For any proposed neighborhood park land dedication less than five (5) acres of land or the payment of afee in lieu thereof, for any proposed required community park land dedication less than five (5) acres of land or the payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or for any proposed land dedication containing floodplain or greenway, the City Manager or his designee is authorized to accept and approve same if the following criteria are met: 1) The proposed dedication or fee provides a sufficient amount of neighborhood park land existing in the park zone of the proposed development for required neighborhood park land dedication, or the proposal provides a sufficient amount of community park land existing for the proposed development for required community park land dedication, whichever applies; 2) Where the proposed dedication is insufficient for a neighborhood park site or for a community park site under existing park design standards, some or all of the dedication requirements may be in the form of a fee in amounts as set forth in Appendix I; 3) Determination of acceptability of a proposed neighborhood park land dedication and for a proposed community park land dedication is based upon the City of College Station's Recreation, Park and Open Space Master Plan, as may be amended from time to time; and 4) The proposed development of the neighborhood park or community park is consistent with College Station's Recreation, Park and Open Space Master Plan, as may be amended form time to time. In making his decision, the City Manager or his designee may choose to submit such application to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for its recommendation. In such event, the City Manager shall consider such recommendation but may make a decision contrary in accordance with the criteria set forth herein. 6. Park Development Fee In addition to the land dedication requirements for neighborhood parks and for community parks, there are also park development fees established herein sufficient to develop neighborhood parks and community parks in ways that meet the City of College Station's Manual of Park Improvements Standards_ The amount of development fees assessed to a developer subject to this section for neighborhood and community parks is as shown in Appendix I. The process for the approval and collection of development fees shall be the same as for the park land dedication requirements to which the development relates, and shall be processed simultaneously with the park land dedication requirements. 7. Construction of Park Improvements in Lieu of Development Fee. A developer may elect to construct required neighborhood park improvements and/or required community park improvements in lieu of paying the associated development fee as set forth herein. In such event: a. A park site plan, developed in cooperation with the Parks and Recreation Department staff, is submitted and approved by the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department or his designee and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board upon submission of final plat or upon application for a building permit, whichever is applicable. b. Detailed plans and specifications for park improvements hereunder shall be due and processed in accordance with the procedures and requirements pertaining to public improvements for final plats and for building permit issuance, whichever is applicable. c. All plans and specifications shall meet or exceed the City's Manual of Park Improvement Standards in effect at the time of the submission. d. If the improvements are constructed on land that has already been dedicated to and/or is owned by the City, then the Developer must post payment and performance bonds to guarantee the payment to subcontractors and suppliers and to guarantee the developer completes the work in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, ordinances, and other applicable laws. e. The construction of all improvements must be completed in accordance with the requirements relating to the construction of public improvements for final plats and issuance of building permits, whichever is applicable. This includes guaranteeing performance in lieu of completing the park improvements prior to final plat approval. Notwithstanding any other applicable ordinances, park improvements should be completed within two years from the date of approval. f Completion and Acceptance — Park development will be considered complete and a Certificate of Completion will be issued after the following requirements are met: i. Improvements have been constructed in accordance with the Approved Plans; ii. All park land upon which the improvements have been constructed has been dedicated as required under this section; and iii. All manufacturers' warranties have been provided for any equipment installed in the park as part of these improvements. g. Upon issuance of a Certificate of Completion, the developer warrants the improvements for a period of one (1) year as set forth in the requirements in the City of College Station's Manual of Park Improvements Standards_ h. The developer shall be liable for any costs required to complete park development if: i. Developer fails to complete the improvements in accordance with the approved plans; or ii. Developer fails to complete any warranty work. 8. Submitting fee. Any fees required to be paid pursuant to this section shall be remitted: a. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for multi -family development; or b. Upon submission of each final plat for single family, duplex or townhouse development. 9. Use of fees. Fees may be used only for the acquisition or development of park facilities to which they relate. For fees in lieu of neighborhood park land dedication, fees may only be used for purchase and/or development of neighborhood parks located within the same zone as the development. For fees in lieu of community park land dedication, fees may only be used for the purchase and/or development of community parks. 10. Reimbursement for City Acquired Park Land. The City may from time to time acquire land for parks in or near an area of actual or potential development. If the City does acquire park land in a park zone for aneighborhood park or acquires parkland for a community park, the City may require subsequent dedications to be in fee -in lieu - of -land only. This will be to reimburse the City for the cost(s) of acquisition. 10-D Prior Dedication or Absence of Prior Dedication. If a dedication requirement arose prior to enactment or amendment of this Section 10, subsequent development for the subject tract to which the dedication requirement applies may be subject to vesting as set forth in Chapter 245 Texas Local Government Code. Depending on the circumstances, additional dedication may be required for the increase in dwelling units from what was originally proposed. 10-E Comprehensive Plan Considerations. The City's Recreation, Park and Open Space Master Plan is intended to provide the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board with a guide upon which to base its recommendations. Because of the need to consider specific characteristics in the site selection process, the park locations indicated in the Plan are general. The actual locations, sizes, and number of parks will be determined when development occurs or when sites are acquired by the City, including by donations. Park zones for neighborhood parks are established in the City's Recreation, Park and Open Space Master Plan as a component of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and indicate service areas for neighborhood parks. Zone boundaries typically follow key topographic features such as major thoroughfares, streams, city limit and ETJ boundary lines. New park zones may be created or existing zones amended pursuant to procedures for amending the City's Recreation, Park and Open Space Master Plan as land acquisitions or other circumstances dictate. 10-F Special Fund; Right to Refund 1. All neighborhood park land dedication fees will be deposited in a fund referenced to the park zone to which it relates. Community park land dedication fees will be deposited in a fund referenced to community parks. 2. The City shall account for all fees in lieu of land and all development fees paid under this Section with reference to the individual plat(s) involved. Any fees paid for such purposes must be expended by the City within five (5) years from the date received by the City for acquisition and/or development of a neighborhood park or a community park as required herein. Such funds shall be considered to be spent on a first -in, first -out basis. If not so expended, the landowners of the property on the expiration of such period shall be entitled to a prorated refund of such sum, computed on a square footage of area basis. The owners of such property must request such refund within one (1) year of entitlement, in writing, or such right shall be barred. 10-G Park Land Guidelines and Requirements Parks should be easy to access and open to public view so as to benefit area development, enhance the visual character of the City, protect public safety and minimize conflict with adjacent land uses. The following guidelines and requirements shall be used in designing parks and adjacent development. 1. Any land dedicated to the City under this section must be suitable for park and recreation uses. The dedication shall be free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances that interfere with its use for park purposes. The City Manager or his designee shall determine whether any encumbrances interfere with park use. Minerals may be reserved from the conveyance provided that there is a complete waiver of the surface use by all mineral owners and lessees. A current title report must be provided with the land dedication. The property owner shall pay all taxes or assessments owed on the property up to the date of acceptance of the dedication by the City. A tax certificate from the Brazos County Tax Assessor shall be submitted with the dedication or plat. 2. Consideration will be given to land that is in the floodplain or may be considered "floodable" even though not in a federally regulated floodplain as long as, due to its elevation, it is suitable for park improvements. Sites should not be severely sloping or have unusual topography which would render the land unusable for recreational activities. 3. Land in floodplains or designated greenways will be considered on a three for one basis. Three acres of floodplain or greenway will be equal to one acre of park land. 4. Where feasible, park sites should be located adjacent to greenways and/or schools in order to encourage shared facilities and joint development of new sites. 5. Neighborhood park sites should be adjacent to residential areas in a manner that serves the greatest number of users and should be located to minimize users having to cross arterial roadways to access them. 6. Where appropriate, sites with existing trees or other scenic elements are preferred. 7. Detention / retention areas may not be used to meet dedication requirements, but may be accepted in addition to the required dedication. If accepted as part of the park, the detention / retention area design must meet specific parks specifications in the City's Manual of Park Improvements Standards. 8. Where park sites are adjacent to greenways, schools, or existing or proposed subdivisions, access ways may be required to facilitate public access to provide public access to parks. 9. It is desirable that fifty percent (50%) of the perimeter of a park abut a public street. 10. Community Parks should be accessible from major arterial streets so as to be accessible by large groups of people from large surrounding areas. 10-H Warranty Required. 1. All materials and equipment provided to the City shall be new unless otherwise approved in advance by the City Manager or his designee and that all work will be of good quality, free from faults and defects, and in conformance with the designs, plans, specifications, and drawings, and recognized industry standards. This warranty, any other warranties express or implied, and any other consumer rights, shall inure to the benefit of the City only and are not made for the benefit of any party other than the City. 2. All work by the developer or landowner not conforming to these requirements, including but not limited to unapproved substitutions, may be considered defective. 3. This warranty is in addition to any rights or warranties expressed or implied by law. 4. Where more than a one (1) year warranty is specified in the applicable plans, specifications, or submittals for individual products, work, or materials, the longer warranty shall govern. 5. This warranty obligation may be covered by any performance or payment bonds tendered in compliance with this Ordinance. 6. If any of the work performed by developer or landowner is found or determined to be either defective, including obvious defects, or otherwise not in accordance with this ordinance, the designs, plans, drawings or specifications within one (1) year after the date of the issuance of a certificate of Final Completion of the work or a designated portion thereof, whichever is longer, or within one (1) year after acceptance by the City of designated equipment, or within such longer period of time as may be prescribed by law or by the terms of any applicable special warranty required by this ordinance, developer shall promptly correct the defective work at no cost to the City. 7. During the applicable warranty period and after receipt of written notice from the City to begin corrective work, developer shall promptly begin the corrective work. The obligation to correct any defective work shall be enforceable under this Code of Ordinances. The guarantee to correct the defective work shall not constitute the exclusive remedy of the City, nor shall other remedies be limited to the terms of either the warranty or the guarantee. 8. If within twenty (20) calendar days after the City has notified developer of a defect, failure, or abnormality in the work, developer has not started to make the necessary corrections or adjustments, the City is hereby authorized to make the corrections or adjustments, or to order the work to be done by a third party. The cost of the work shall be paid by developer. 9. The cost of all materials, parts, labor, transportation, supervision, special instruments, and supplies required for the replacement or repair of parts and for correction of defects shall be paid by Developer, its contractors, or subcontractors or by the surety. 10. The guarantee shall be extended to cover all repairs and replacements furnished, and the term of the guarantee for each repair or replacement shall be one (1) year after the installation or completion. The one (1) year warranty shall cover all work, equipment, and materials that are part of the improvements made under this section of the ordinance. City of College Station Park Land Dedication Ordinance Neighborhood Park Calculations - 2012 Starting Point: 2012 population; 96,603 346.26 acres of neighborhood parks 96,603/346.26 = 1 acre of neighborhood park per 279 people Land Donation: Single Family- 279 people/ 2.38/PPH = 117 Dwelling Units per acre of donated land for neighborhood park Multi Family- 279 people/2.38 PPH = 117 Dwelling Units per acre of donated land for neighborhood park Land Acquisition: $32,000/acre/117 Dwelling Units = $274 Single Family Land Acquisition Cost/Dwelling Unit $32,000/acre/117 Dwelling Units = $274 Multi Family Land Acquisition Cost/Dwelling Unit Park Development: One neighborhood park serves 2,300 people (96,603 pop. / 42 neighborhood parks = 2,300 people) Single Family Neighborhood Park Development Cost $350,000/2,300 =$152.00 per person neighborhood park development cost $152.00 X 2.38 PPH = $361.76 = $362.00 per Dwelling Unit Multi Family Neighborhood Park Development Cost $350,000/2,300 =$152.00 per person neighborhood park development cost $152.00 X 2.38 PPH = $361.76 = $362.00 per Dwelling Unit Total Neighborhood Park Parkland Dedication Fees per Dwelling Unit: Single Family Neighborhood Park Fee= $274 (Land Acquisition) + $362.00 (Park Development) =$636.00 per Dwelling Unit Multi Family Neighborhood Park Fee= $274 (Land Acquisition) + $362.00 (Park Development) =$636.00 per Dwelling Unit City of College Station Park Land Dedication Ordinance Community Park Calculations - 2012 Starting Point: 2012 population; 96,603 316.31 acres of community parks (8 total parks) 96,603/316.31 = 1 acre of community park per 305 people Land Donation: Single Family- 305 people/ 2.38/PPH = 128 Dwelling Units per acre of donated land for community park Multi Family- 305 people/2.38 PPH = 128 Dwelling Units per acre of donated land for community park Land Acquisition: $32,000/acre/128 Dwelling Units = $250 Single Family Land Acquisition Cost/Dwelling Unit $32,000/acre/128 Dwelling Units = $250 Multi Family Land Acquisition Cost/Dwelling Unit Park Development: One community park serves people 12,075 (96,603 pop. / 8 community parks = 12,075 people) Single Family Community Park Development Cost $1,900,000/12,075 =$157.35 per person community park development cost ($7,600,000 Community Park development cost average X 75% discount) $157.35.00 X 2.38 PPH = $374.49 = $375.00 per Dwelling Unit Multi Family Community Park Development Cost $3,800,000/12,075 =$314.70 per person community park development cost ($7,600,000 Community Park development cost average X 50%) $314.70 X 2.38 PPH = $748.99 = $750.00 per Dwelling Unit Total Community Park Parkland Dedication Fees per Dwelling Unit: Single Family Community Park Fee= $250 (Land Acquisition) + $375 (Park Development) _$ 625.00 per Dwelling Unit Multi Family Community Park Fee= $250 (Land Acquisition) + $750 (Park Development) =$1,000.00 per Dwelling Unit Comparison: Current Ordinance (2009) VS Proposed Ordinance (2012) SUMMARY Single Family Neighborhood Park Fee $274 (Land Acquisition) + $362.00 (Park Development) =$636.00 per Dwelling Unit Single Family Community Park Fee= $250 (Land Acquisition) + $375 (Park Development) _$ 625.00 per Dwelling Unit Multi Family Neighborhood Park Fee $274 (Land Acquisition) + $362.00 (Park Development) =$636.00 per Dwelling Unit Multi Family Community Park Fee= $250 (Land Acquisition) + $750 (Park Development) =$1,000.00 per Dwelling Unit Total Single Family (SF) Multi -Family (MF) PARKLAND TOTAL Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Regional Parks (Veteran's Park, Lick Creek Park) TOTAL (as of 1-1-2012) Current Proposed $2,021 $1,261 $1,646 $1,636 #Parks Current Proposed Neighborhood Park Land (fee in lieu) 346.26 3.58 Single Family (SF) $ 314 $ 274 Multi -Family (MF) $ 256 $ 274 Community Park Land (fee in lieu) 13.75 Single Family (SF) $ 305 $ 250 Multi -Family (MF) $ 248 $ 250 Neighborhood Park Development Single Family (SF) $ 764 $ 362 Multi -Family (MF) $ 622 $ 362 Community Park Development Single Family (SF) $ 638 $ 375 Multi -Family (MF) $ 520 $ 750 SUMMARY Single Family Neighborhood Park Fee $274 (Land Acquisition) + $362.00 (Park Development) =$636.00 per Dwelling Unit Single Family Community Park Fee= $250 (Land Acquisition) + $375 (Park Development) _$ 625.00 per Dwelling Unit Multi Family Neighborhood Park Fee $274 (Land Acquisition) + $362.00 (Park Development) =$636.00 per Dwelling Unit Multi Family Community Park Fee= $250 (Land Acquisition) + $750 (Park Development) =$1,000.00 per Dwelling Unit Total Single Family (SF) Multi -Family (MF) PARKLAND TOTAL Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Regional Parks (Veteran's Park, Lick Creek Park) TOTAL (as of 1-1-2012) Current Proposed $2,021 $1,261 $1,646 $1,636 #Parks #acres #acres/1000 pop. 42 346.26 3.58 8 316.31 3.27 2 665.54 6.89 13.75 52 1,328.11 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK (Average size = 8 acres) COST ESTIMATES CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 1. Six (6') Foot Sidewalk — $5.50 per Square Foot x 1,800 LF (1/3 Mile) $60,000 2. Handicap Accessible Ramp — Two (2) each $2,000 3. Picnic Unit — Slab, table, trash can, and grill at $4,000 each x 2 $8,000 4. Shelter and Slab — Two (2) picnic tables with trash cans $34,000 5. Area Lights — Twelve (12') LED Lights, Ten (10) @ $4,000 each $40,000 6. Two Park Signs — Cylex, 2' x 8' with keystone planter bed $6,000 7. Benches — Painted steel with concrete slab, $2,000 each x Four (4) $8,000 8. Bicycle Racks — One (1) at $1,500 each $1,500 9. Trees — Thirty gallon, installed, 50 trees at $225 each $11,250 10. Specialized Irrigation System $3,000 11. Drinking Fountains — One (1) concrete, handicap accessible, dual height, dog dish @ $6,000 each $6,000 12. One -inch (1") Water Meter $500 13. Electric Meters with Breaker Panels $2,000 14. Finish Sodding, Grading and Seeding $5,000 15. Drain Lines — An average of 100 LF at $20 per LF $2,000 16. Swing Set with Synthetic Rubber Surfacing $25,000 17. Playground with Concrete Base and Synthetic Rubber Surfacing for Children Ages 2 — 5 $70,000 18. Shade Cover for Playground for Children Ages 2 — 5 $20,000 $304,250 Ten (10%) Contingency $30,425 Project Management @ Five (5%) Percent $15,212 349 887 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 COMMUNITY PARK (Average size = 50 acres) COST ESTIMATES CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Basketball Court with Pavilion $250,000 Ten (10') Foot Sidewalk - $5.50 per Square Foot x 8,000 LF $352,000 Handicap Accessible Ramp - 6 each $6,000 Pedestrian Bridges - Average 40' x 10' with concrete footings $50,000 Picnic Unit - Slab, table, trash can, and grill at $4,000 each x 2 $8,000 Shelter and Slab - Two (2) picnic tables with trash cans $34,000 Area Lights - 12' lights, $4,000 each x 30 $120,000 Two Park Signs - Cylex, 2' x 8' with keystone planter bed $6,000 Benches - Painted steel with concrete slab, $2,000 each x 8 $16,000 Bicycle Racks - Two (2) at $1,500 each $3,000 Trees - Thirty gallon, installed 300 at $225 each $67,500 Specialized Irrigation System $65,000 Drinking Fountains - Two (2) concrete, handicap accessible, dual height, dog dish @ $6,000 each $12,000 Three-inch (3") Water Meter $3,600 Electric Meters with Breaker Panels $4,000 Finish Sodding, Grading and Seeding $15,000 Drain Lines - An average of 200 LF at $20 per LF $4,000 Swing Set with Synthetic Rubber Surfacing $25,000 Playground with Concrete Base and Synthetic Rubber Surfacing for Children Ages 5 - 12 $100,000 Playground with Concrete Base and Synthetic Rubber Surfacing for Children Ages 2 - 5 $70,000 Shade Cover for Playground for Children Ages 2 - 5 $17,500 Tennis Courts - Two (2) $80,000 Pavilion with Restrooms and Kitchen $400,000 Galvanized Fence - Average of 3,000 LF @ $36 per LF $108,000 Baseball Fields with Concessions Building - Average Four (4) Fields $2,500,000 Park Spaces - Average of 250 Spaces @ $4,000 per Space $1,000,000 Park Street $375,000 Storm Sewer, Electrical, and Structural $200,000 Engineering Fees Plus Survey - Average Twelve (12%) of Project Cost $700,000 $6,591,600 Ten (10%) Contingency $659,100 Project Management @ Five (5%) Percent 362 000 $7,612,700 Park System Inventory 2015 cul{ CIIY OF COW,EGE STAT10N PARKNAME • - . d y Q M eesee■®■mete■■®■®■■■■■■e■� W Q W U Q W Z Y Q d f Z w O J % W O y O W O m N cx W F W y Z OJ Q d f Z J Z U LL f j R J d Q W Q J d Z Wd O W d, f0 Z WO LLd KM WO Q 3 J Q W J f Z J O� Z (%Z O- '1J Q 3 Z O J Q U J J W Q N_ M U W W N w m N O LL d' W U O N O W LL J pQp� F LL N O W LL J Q W N m M J U W N j Z O W> O W LL Q d O N Z O Z Y 3 M cx y d M R U J J d OTHER BROTHERSP• • ett�ee■a■mtmet�■t�e®■ete■t■t■t■■tttttt■ ::" 000®■■■■0■■■■■®■■SO■■■ CROSSING ett�ee■tet■et■■t■t■ts■■■t■t■■t■t■t■■tttttt■ CASTLEGATE ©�mo■o■®®oma■®■■■■■e■■■■� -. ett�ee■ett■mtm■t■t■t®■■tset■■t■t■t■■tttttt■ ... ett�®e■t■t■t■t■■t■t■®■■■t■t■■t■t■t■■tttttt■ e�ee■e■eee■■ ■■ee■■■■■■ �. a ee■t■t■t■t■■t■t■®■■■t■t■■t■t■t■■tttttt■ ett�ee■tet■mt■et�t■t®■■■t■t■■t■t■t■■ ett�ee■t■t■t■t■et■t■tt■■■■t■t■■t■t■t■■tttttt■ : ett�ee■tet■t■®et■t■t�■ee■te■e■e■tttttt■ EMERALD FORESTett�ee■■■®®■■■tom■®■t■t■■t■t■t■■tttttt■ . - ett�ee■tet■®eet■t■t�■®■ete■t■t■t■■tttttt■ ett�ee■®®m®e■■t®■■■■■■e■e■tate• . -... ett�ee■a®ee■tmet�■�■t■t■■t■t■e■tttttt■ � m�ee■t■t■t■t■■t■eta■■■t■t■■t■t■e■tttttt■ . ett�ee■t■t■®®■t■t■tt■■®■t■t■■t■t■e■tttttt■ . - ett�ee■t■t■®t■■t■t■�■■■t■t■■t■t■t■■tttttt■ LUTHJONES ett�ee■t■t■t■t■et■t■tt■■■■mt■■t■t■t■■tttttt■ - - ..epee■■■®®e■e®■e■■■■■■■■� . - ett�ee■t■t■t■t■■t■t■tt■■■■t■t■■t■t■t■■tttttt■ . ett�ee■t■emeet■t■t�■®■t■t■■ett■t■■ ett�ee■t■t■m®et■t■tt■■■■t■t■■t■t■e■tttttt■ PEBBLE CREEK e ee■tet■®eet■t■t®■®eete■t■t■t■■ e ee■tet■®®et■t■t®■■■t■t■■t■t■t■■tttttt■ ee■t■t■t■t■■t■t■tt■■■■t■t■■t■t■t■■tttttt■ -MEADOWSa = • ett�ee■t■t■t■t■et■t■t®■■■t■t■■t■t■t■e • . ett®ee■tet■t■eet■t■t®em■e�■t■t■e■tttttt■ epee■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� Revised June 5, 2015 PARKNAME Y LL Wd W Z N W Y O J J Q d W M f d U J O W d d rail O Q WOd 0: JZ �O d Q O W D7J f Z �O 3 F y K OO J W N d U N W J f O W J W Q K Qm0. U} Z O O2 O N U f Q y U Y J Q d OTHER 515.54 1 Regional Athletic 150.00 57 Total Parks - 1,372.23 Acres Developed Parks: 49 Parks Undeveloped Parks: 8 Parks * Cemeteries are not included in acreage totals. 2 1 Municipal Cemeteries 1 75 Acres . - .. e�ee■e■®®ems■®■mom■■■■■■■ STEEPLECHASE e ee■o■®®a■■®■®■■■■■■■■ STEPHEN C. BEACHY CENTRAL e�ooe®®■■a■o®a®®■■e■■■■ • � 000®®■®■0■■■0®■■■®■®®■� VETERANS ATHLETIC m eee■■■■e■■■■■®®■■■■■® VV.A.TARROVV(VV. Smith) WALLACE LAKE ees®e■■■■■e�■ ®��■■■■■e■� WOLF CREEKWOODLAND ...PEN ee�ee■■�®®ems■®■®�■�■®■■■� HILLS QUANTITY PARK TYPE 8 Mini TOTAL ACREAGE* 13.86 38 Neighborhood 346.52 Total Nei hborhood Park Acrea a 360.38 9 1 Community 346.31 Total Community Park Acreage 346.31 1 Regional Nature 515.54 1 Regional Athletic 150.00 57 Total Parks - 1,372.23 Acres Developed Parks: 49 Parks Undeveloped Parks: 8 Parks * Cemeteries are not included in acreage totals. 2 1 Municipal Cemeteries 1 75 Acres A - Arboretum C - Community Park D - Developed FP - Fishing Pond F - Open Practice Fields M - Mini Park P - Pond (Non -fishing) RN - Regional Nature Park RA - Regional Athletic Park SP - Spray/Splash Park State Historic - State Marker on site U - Undeveloped N - Neighborhood Park O - Lighted Facilities • - Unlighted Facilities PARK A CREA GE PER iii RESIDENTS Neighborhood Park Acrea per1,000 360.34 Acres 3.52 Community Park Acres per1,000 346.31Acres 3.15 Total Acreage per 1,000 Residents 6.90 Based on March 2015 Population Estimate of 102,429 received from the Office of Planning & Development Services. * Mini parks are neighborhood parks, and as such, are included in the totals for Neighborhood Parks. **The Arboretum, as part of Bee Creek Park, is included in the total acreage for Community Parks. Revised June 5, 2015 _ College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexivA&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File #: 15-0505 Version: 1 Name: Upcoming Meetings Type: Updates Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/25/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: * Thursday, September 10, 2015 - City Council Meeting - Council Chambers - Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. * Thursday, September 17, 2015 - P&Z Meeting - Council Chambers - Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Date Ver. Action By Action Result Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings- * Thursday, September 10, 2015 - City Council Meeting - Council Chambers - Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. * Thursday, September 17, 2015 - P&Z Meeting - Council Chambers - Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM _ College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexivA&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File #: 15-0517 Version: 1 Name: Update on Council Action Type: Updates Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/28/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: * A Rezoning for approximately 2.429 acres generally located between Jane Street and Eisenhower Street from O Office and GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District for the Embassy Suites project. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 6, 2015 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7 -0) to approve the request. * A Rezoning adding a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay for approximately 32 acres located in the McCulloch Subdivision along Holleman Drive. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 20, 2015 and voted (4-2) to recommend approval with amendments. The City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request as amended by the Commission. * A Rezoning for approximately 1.57 acres located at 14015 Renee Lane from R Rural to GS General Suburban. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 6, 2015 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. * A Rezoning for approximately 12 acres along State Highway 6 north of Christ Unitied Methodist Church from GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District for the MRC Senior Housing project. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 6, 2015 and voted (6- 0) to recommend approval. City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. * A Rezoning for approximately 28.5 acres located along Holleman Drive South across from the Quail Run Subdivision from R Rural and GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development District for the Aspen Heights multi -family project. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 7, 2015 and voted (4-1) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on June 25, 2015 and deferred the request to their second August meeting so further traffic analysis could be performed. The Council reconsidered this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (6-1) to approve the request. Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Date Ver. Action By Action Result Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items: * A Rezoning for approximately 2.429 acres generally located between Jane Street and Eisenhower Street from O Office and GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District for the Embassy Suites project. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 6, 2015 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. * A Rezoning adding a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay for approximately 32 acres located in the McCulloch Subdivision along Holleman Drive. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 20, 2015 and voted (4-2) to recommend approval with amendments. The City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request as amended by the College Station, TX Page 1 of 2 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM File #: 15-0517, Version: 1 Commission. A Rezoning for approximately 1.57 acres located at 14015 Renee Lane from R Rural to GS General Suburban. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 6, 2015 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. A Rezoning for approximately 12 acres along State Highway 6 north of Christ Unitied Methodist Church from GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District for the MRC Senior Housing project. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 6, 2015 and voted (6 -0) to recommend approval. City Council heard this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. A Rezoning for approximately 28.5 acres located along Holleman Drive South across from the Quail Run Subdivision from R Rural and GS General Suburban to PDD Planned Development District for the Aspen Heights multi -family project. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 7, 2015 and voted (4-1) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on June 25, 2015 and deferred the request to their second August meeting so further traffic analysis could be performed. The Council reconsidered this item on August 27, 2015 and voted (6-1) to approve the request. College Station, TX Page 2 of 2 Printed on 828/2015 powered by LegistarT. City College Station, TX 1101 Te aslAve College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Meeting Agenda - Final Home ofT vAdM Univemity' Planning and Zoning Commission Regular The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting. Thursday, September 3, 2015 7:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 4. Consent Agenda 4.1 15-0500 Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Request from meetings. *Casey Oldham — August 20, 2015 Attachments: Absence Request - Oldham 4.2 15-0510 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes *August 20, 2015 — Workshop *August 20, 2015 — Regular Attachments: August 20 2015 Workshop August 20 2015 Regular 4.3 15-0515 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat College Station, TX Page 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - Final September 3, 2015 Regular for The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 107 consisting of 63 townhouse lots on approximately 7.708 acres located at 101 Deacon Drive West, generally located southeast of the intersection of General Parkway and Deacon Drive West. Case #FP2014-900268 Sponsors: Schubert Attachments: Staff Report Application Final Plat Regular Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 5. 15-0519 Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Caprock Crossing Lot 3A -R, Block 1 and Lots 1A -R2, 3R, 4R and Common Area 1R, Block 2 being a replat of Caprock Crossing Lot 3A, Block 1 and Lot 1A -R1 and Common Area 1, Block 2 and an unplatted 0.48 -acre tract A, Babille Survey, A-75 S.W. Robertson League, A-202 consisting of four lots and one common area on approximately 11.79 acres located at 1451 Greens Prairie Road West, generally located near the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and State Highway 6. Case #FPCO2015-000005 (M. Thomas) Attachments: Staff Report Application Final Plat 6. 15-0486 Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from D Duplex to GC General Commercial for approximately 0.499 acres being Lots 3 & 10, Block B and a portion of the Alley of the College Heights Subdivision, generally located at 408 Nimitz Street and 409 Eisenhower Street, more generally located north of University Drive East and south of Cooner Street. Case #REZ2015-000012 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change) Sponsors: Bombek College Station, TX Page 2 Printed on 8282015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - Final September 3, 2015 Regular Attachments: Staff Report Application Rezoning Map 7. 15-0484 Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Conditional Use Permit for a Night Club/Bar/Tavern, more specifically the Eskimo Hut, consisting of approximately 2,475 square feet of the Woodstone Shopping Plaza being Park Place, Block 4, Lot 3, generally located at 919 Harvey Road, located on the east side of Woodstone Shopping Center which is generally located on the northwest corner of Harvey Road and Munson Avenue. Case #CUP2015-000002 (M. Thomas) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change.) Attachments: Staff Report Application Site Plan 8. 15-0488 Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to SC Suburban Commercial for approximately 7.91 acres being situated in the Robert Stevenson Survey, Abstract No. 54, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being all of the 4.71 acre tract described in the deed from Eugene B. Savage, III, to Eugene B. Savage, III, Revocable Trust, to Jupiter & Space Property, LLC, recorded in Volume 9849, Page 220, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and all of the 3.19 acre tract described in the deed from Larry Ruffino, Trustee, to Jupiter & Space Property, LLC, recorded in Volume 9849, Page 214, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, generally located at 2970 Barron Road, generally located southwest of the intersection of William D. Fitch Pkwy and Barron Road. Case #REZ2015-000013 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015City Council meeting - subject to change) Sponsors: Walker Attachments: Staff Report Application Rezoning Map 9. 15-0492 Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion College Station, TX Page 3 Printed on 8282015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - Final September 3, 2015 Regular regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District in order to revise the commercial component of a mixed-use development for approximately 11 acres being Lot 1A, 2A and 3, Block 1 of Northpoint Crossing Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, generally located at the northwest intersection of University Drive and Texas Avenue. Case #REZ2015-000011 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change) Sponsors: Bullock Attachments: Staff Report Application Rezoning Map Proposed Concept Plan 10. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 12. Adjourn The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion. City Manager I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on 20xx at 5:00 p.m. City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 7643517 or (TDD) 1 800 735 2989. Agendas may be viewed on College Station, TX Page 4 Printed on 8282015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - Final September 3, 2015 Regular v .cstx.gov. Council meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. College Station, TX Page 5 Printed on 8282015 _ College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexivA&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File M 15-0500 Version: 1 Name: Type: Absence Request Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/25/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Request from meetings. *Casey Oldham - August 20, 2015 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Absence Reauest - Oldham Date Ver. Action By Action Result Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Request from meetings. *Casey Oldham - August 20, 2015 College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d' Development Servicer Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name Casev Oldham Request Submitted on August 17, 2015 I will not be in attendance at the meeting on August 20, 2015 for the reason specified: (Date) Signature Casey Oldham _ College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexivA&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File #: 15-0510 Version: 1 Name: P&Z Meeting Minutes Type: Minutes Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/26/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes *August 20, 2015 - Workshop *August 20, 2015 - Regular Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: August 20 2015 Workshop August 20 2015 Regular Date Ver. Action By Action Result Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes *August 20, 2015 - Workshop *August 20, 2015 - Regular College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM (*0Fq" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTmavA&M University' MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Workshop Meeting August 20, 2015, 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Jerome Rektorik, Jodi Warner, Barry Moore, Jim Ross and Kirk Joseph COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Aldrich CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert, Danielle Singh, Madison Thomas, Laura Walker, Carla Robinson, Natalie Ruiz, Carol Cotter, John Christensen, Lauren Basey and Kristen Hejny 1. Call the meeting to order. Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. There was general discussion regarding Regular Agenda Item 7. Commissioner Rektorik asked for a brief explanation of the application requirements for an Overlay. Principal Planner Prochazka explained that the Overlay requires an application with 50% plus one property owner signatures on a petition. 3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items in the 2015 P&Z Plan of Work. (J. Schubert) Principal Planner Schubert gave a brief update to the Commission There was discussion amongst the Commission. 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the City's economic development plans and activities (N. Ruiz) Director of Economic Development Ruiz gave a brief presentation on Economic Development efforts and strategies. August 20, 2015 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 Commissioner Rektorik asked who would run the accelerator/incubator. Commissioner Joseph arrived to the meeting at 6:11 p.m. Director of Economic Development Ruiz responded that there are no definite possibilities yet Commissioner Rektorik asked if City Council has discussed when infrastructure on Lakeway Drive and Pebble Creek Parkway would begin. Director of Economic Development Ruiz responded that there are budgeted funds and funds available from the 2008 Bond available. Lakeway Drive should be out for bid at the end of 2014 for construction in spring of 2016. Commissioner Joseph asked what the revenue stream turnover would be relative to an Economic Development Fund. Director of Economic Development Ruiz stated that proceeds of property sales, and general fund. 6. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: *Thursday, August 27, 2015 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Warner) *Thursday September 3, 2015 — P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers — Executive Session 5:00 p.m., Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 7. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding an update on the following items: *A rezoning of approximately 20.872 acres from R Rural to 17.14 acres of RS Restricted Suburban and 3.732 acres of SC Suburban Commercial, generally located at the northeast corner of Rock Prairie Road and Bird Pond Road. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on June 18, 2015 and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 13, 2015 and voted (6-0-1) to approve the request with conditions. *A rezoning of approximately 4.73 acres from GC General Commercial and OV Corridor Overlay to GC General Commercial, generally located at the southwest corner of University Drive East and Glenhaven Drive. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 16, 2015 and voted (4- 0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 13, 2015 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. There was no discussion. 8. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board, Joint Annexation Task Force. There was no discussion. 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the August 20, 2015 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Rektorik asked if the Commission could receive the waste water presentation given to the Joint Annexation Task Force. 10. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Approved: Jane Kee, Chairperson Planning & Zoning Commission Attest: Kristen Hejny, Admin. Support Specialist Planning & Development Services August 20, 2015 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 (*0Fq" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of TOMAdM University' MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting August 20, 2015, 7:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Jerome Rektorik, Jodi Warner, Barry Moore, Jim Ross and Kirk Joseph COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Aldrich CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert, Danielle Singh, Madison Thomas, Laura Walker, Carla Robinson, Carol Cotter, John Christensen, Lauren Basey and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledee of Allegiance 3. Hear Citizens No citizens spoke. 4. Consent Agenda 4.1 Consideration, possible action and discussion on Absence Request from meetings. *Jodi Warner — August 6, 2015 4.2 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes. *August 6, 2015 — Workshop *August 6, 2015 — Regular Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1— 4.2. Commissioner Joseph seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). August 20, 2015 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda. 6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Tower Point Subdivision Phase 10B Lot 5, Block 2, Lots 1, 2 & 3, Block 3 including a replat of Tower Point Subdivision Phase 10A, Lot 4, Block 3 consisting of 5 lots on approximately 30.76 acres located at 4370 State Highway 6 South, generally located south of the intersection with Arrington Road. Case #FPCM2013-900211 (J. Schubert) Principal Planner Schubert presented the Final Plat and recommended approval. Chuck Ellison, Applicant, stated that he was available for questions from the Commission Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve the Final Plat. Commissioner Moore seconded the motion, the motion passed (6-0). Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by adding a NCO Neighborhood Conservation Overlay zoning district for approximately 32 acres, being located in the single-family portion of the McCulloch Subdivision, an area generally bordered to the north by Holleman Drive, to the south by Nevada Street, to the west by Pecan Tree Estates Subdivision, Phases 1 and 2 and to the east by lots fronting the southwest side of Georgia Street (1112 through 1128 Georgia), and including a portion of the lots fronting the north end of Georgia Street (1100 through 1113 Georgia) in College Station, Brazos County, Texas. Case #REZ2015-000009 (J. Prochazka) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council Meeting — subject to change.) Principal Planner Prochazka presented the rezoning and recommended approval. Commissioner Ross asked how many signatures were collected on the petition. Principal Planner Prochazka stated that approximately 59% of the property owner's signatures were collected. Commissioner Ross asked if there have been any issues with street size in this area Principal Planner Prochazka stated that there are no known issues. August 20, 2015 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 Commissioner Rektorik asked if on -street parking was allowed in this area. Principal Planner Prochazka stated that on -street parking is allowed and there are no access concerns noted from the College Station Fire Department. Commissioner Joseph asked if the duplexes on Oney Hervey are within this zoning area. Principal Planner Prochazka stated that these duplexes were included in the Southside Area Neighborhood Plan, but are not included within the zoning area. Commissioner Kee asked if the overlay would affect churches and/or rental properties. Principal Planner Prochazka stated that the overlay will not affect either. Commissioner Joseph asked if an individual could request a change in the overlay regulations. Principal Planner Prochazka stated that an individual can request a variance to the overlay through the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Applicant, Timothy Campbell, 1204 Carolina Street, was available to present this item to the Commission. Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing The following citizens spoke in support of the rezoning: Towanna Ford, 1217 Arizona Street Roshanda Merchant, 1209 Phoenix Street Kimmie Daily Hawkins, owner of 1203 Detroit Street and 1103 Phoenix Street Aundra Ellis, 1109 Detroit Street Carolyn Waldon, 1210 Detroit Street Carolyn Lyons, 1201 Carolina Street These citizens expressed concern about the size of new rental homes out of character with the area, affordability of houses with rising taxes, on -street parking and speeding. Charles Wilding, 4912 Augusta Circle, addressed the Commission with concerns about the limitations the overlay district would put on new homes in the area. Chris McCall, 742 Merimac, Spring, Texas, addressed the Commission with concerns regarding the overlay. Keith Roberts, 2168 Rockcliffe Loop, address the Commission regarding limitations places on the real estate aspect of buying/selling homes in the area. Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing. Commissioner Rektorik motioned to recommended approval of the rezoning. Commissioner Ross seconded the motion. August 20, 2015 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 There was discussion amongst the Commission regarding the proposed motion. Commissioner Rektorik motioned to amend the main motion, ch angin g the 31 % maximum lot coverage to 41% maximum lot coverage. Commissioner Ross seconded the amendment. Commissioner Rektorik asked if conditions can be added to the overlay by the Commission. City Attorney Robinson stated that adding conditions is not advisable. Chairperson Kee asked if the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO) can limit bedrooms or change parking requirements. Principal Planner Prochazka stated that the NCO cannot limit bedrooms, and that this district currently has availability for on -street parking. The Commission voted to approve the amendment to the main motion. The motion passed (4- 2) with Commissioners Joseph and Moore voting against the amendment. The Commission approved the main motion by a vote of (4-2), with Commissioners Joseph and Moore voting against the rezoning. 8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. No future agenda items were mentioned. 9. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Approved: Jane Kee, Chairperson Planning & Zoning Commission Attest: Kristen Hejny, Admin. Support Specialist Planning & Development Services August 20, 2015 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 _ College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexivA&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File M 15-0515 Version: 1 Name: Barracks II Phase 107 Final Plat Type: Final Plat Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/27/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 107 consisting of 63 townhouse lots on approximately 7.708 acres located at 101 Deacon Drive West, generally located southeast of the intersection of General Parkway and Deacon Drive West. Case #FP2014-900268 Sponsors: Jason Schubert Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Staff Report Application Final Plat Date Ver. Action By Action Result Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 107 consisting of 63 townhouse lots on approximately 7.708 acres located at 101 Deacon Drive West, generally located southeast of the intersection of General Parkway and Deacon Drive West. Case #FP2014-900268 College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FINAL PLAT for The Barracks II Phase 107 FP2014-900268 SCALE: 63 townhouse lots on approximately 7.708 acres LOCATION: 101 Deacon Drive West, generally located southeast of the intersection of General Parkway and Deacon Drive West ZONING: PDD Planned Development District APPLICANT: Heath Phillips Investments, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Schubert, AICP, Principal Planner jschubert@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3 September 3, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 3 September 3, 2015 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 2002 Zoning: A -O Agricultural Open upon annexation A -O Agricultural Open to PDD Planned Development District in 2011, revisions to the PDD in 2012 to amend street layout and add uses, in 2013 to remove some commercial areas and add more townhome lots, and in 2014 to add a 29 -acre tract development and revise some of the commercial uses. Preliminary Plan: Original version approved in 2011 with revised versions approved in October 2012, February 2014, and May 2015. Site Development: Phases 100-106, 108, 200, 201, and 300 have been filed for record. Final Plat applications have been submitted for Phases 202, 400 and 401 and are currently under review. COMMENTS Parkland Dedication: Neighborhood park land dedication was provided with previous phases. Also, as the developer is constructing Neighborhood Park improvements, parkland dedication fees of $39,375 (63 lots x $625) for Community Parks are due prior to filing of the Final Plat. Greenways: N/A Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks are provided on both sides of all proposed streets and on the development side of Old Wellborn Road. Bicycle Connectivity: Bikes lanes are along General Parkway, minor collector, and Deacon Drive West, major collector. Impact Fees: The subject tract is located within the Steeplechase Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area and will be required to pay $144.87 per LUE (Living Unit Equivalent) at time of building permit. REVIEW CRITERIA Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with the approved Preliminary Plan and the Subdivision Requirements contained in the Unified Development Ordinance. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Copy of Final Plat Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3 September 3, 2015 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A6M University' FINAL PLAT APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: TIME. I !1 C:,- STAFF: (Check one) f Minor ❑ Amending ❑X Final ❑ Vacating ❑ Replat ($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932) Is this plat in the ETJI? ❑ Yes 0 No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential 0 MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: &$700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above). #J/O233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 1% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and ay not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.) g -"two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report. ,®two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable). ❑❑ Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). � Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate urrent within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens, encumbrances, etc. x Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ❑X The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete. Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference NAME OF PROJECT The Barracks // Subdivision Phase 107 ADDRESS Intersection of Deacon Drive and General Parkway SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT: East Side of Holleman Drive South between Cain Road and Rock Prairie Road APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Heath Phillips E-mail heath_superiorstructures@yahoo.co Street Address P.O. Box 262 City Wellborn Phone Number 979-229-5906 State Tx Fax Number Zip Code 979-703-7903 77881 1/11 Page 1 of 9 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMA SON (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Heath Phillips Investments, LLC (Heath Phillips, manager) E-mail heath_superiorstructures@yahoo.co Street Address P.O. Box 262 City wellborn State Tx Zip Code 77881 Phone Number 979-229-5906 Fax Number 979-703-7903 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION Name Schultz Engineering, LLC - Joe Schultz E-mail loeschultz84@verizon. net Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979.764.3900 Fax Number 979.764.3910 Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? XX Yes ❑ No Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page No. Total Acreage 7.708 Total No. of Lots 63 R -O -W Acreage 2.35 Acres Existing Use Vacant Proposed Use Townhouse Residential Number of Lots By Zoning District 63 / PDD ! I Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 0.09 / PDD Floodplain Acreage None Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? F Yes [X; No This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? Xi Yes No If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: THE BARRACKS II (PP) City Project Number (if known): 14-00900010 Date / Timeframe when submitted: 2/5/14 Page 2 of 9 A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable): N-ClUested waiver to subdivision IVIA ulations and reason for same (if applicable): Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. MA - 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. A I 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1. r An alternative pedestrian way or multi -use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2. F-11 The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan; 3. F71 A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months; 4. F; Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate / rural context; 5. When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi -use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan; 1/11 Page 3 of 9 6. The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or 7. r The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan - Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Detailed expEanation of condition identified above: WA NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission. Requested Oversize Participation None Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: 1895' Streets 3492' Sidewalks 658' Sanitary Sewer Lines 1476' Water Lines 120' Channels 3405' Storm Sewers 0 Bike Lanes I Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: No. of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee No. of acres in floodplain No. of acres in detention No. of acres in greenways A10 FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ _ $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. /11 Signature and title 01 /1,. /1 / Date 1/11 Page 4 of 9 Owner Certification: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ri 8. 9. 10. CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re -issued. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre - pour) and post construction. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE. a L Property Owner(s) Date Engineer Certification: 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. 1 will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO:i ND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMI=N.'PlL -, 11T APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND CURATE. rya r: n c L/jam 'ilc. lo ! ✓ SCH Lff Enoedu5o J, 4pQo y� Date 1/11 Page 5 of 9 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION � OF A N II 7.708 ACRE TRACT CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE. A-7 C7 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 1002W- METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN - THE CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 7, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY. TEXAS, SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 108.68 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A r DEED TO HEATH PHILLIPS INVESTMENTS, U.C. RECORDED IN VOLUME 9627, PAGE 73 OF THE OFFICIAL 1 PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 1 SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS; �( J -{f ODREMAINDERFOUND COMMENCING AT A H INCH IRON FOUND F ROD ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF OLD WELLBORN ROAD MARKING THE EAST CORNER OF SAID OF TOB BB ACRE TRACT; t THENCE: N 47' 04' 17' W ALONG THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF OLD WELLBORN ROAD FOR A DISTANCE OF I 917.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF REGINNING OF THIS HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT; THENCE: THROUGH SAID REMAINDER OF 108.86 ACRE TRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS: ' S 42' 14' 17" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 644.85 FEET TO THE EXTENSION OF THE NORTHEAST LINE OF j GENERAL PARKWAY (67' R.O.W.); 1, @1pYma0 of the Planning and Zoning Csnmes!m pt Bae FJIT M Utlege 5lptWn. Texas, hereby certify that the 40 N 47' 45' 43" W ALONG THE NORTHEAST LINE OF GENERAL PARKWAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 95 DO 20 0 40 FEET TO ME BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISSE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; SCALE IN FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90' GO' 00" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39 27 aPi FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 02' 45 43 W - 35.35 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; N 42' 14' 17' E FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.51 FEET; N 47' 45' 43' W FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; S 42' 14' 17' W FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90' 00' 00" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27 FEET (CHORD BEARS: S 67' 14' 17' W - 35.36 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE ON THE NORTHEAST LINE OF GENERAL PARKWAY; N 47' 45' 43" W ALONG THE NORTHEAST LINE OF GENERAL PARKWAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 65.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; 1HF. II "J1001VISIfrJ ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90' 00' 00' FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27 FIHASL. !Oo FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 02' 45' 43' W - 35.36 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; 1I3F�ILI111, N 47. 45' 43" W ACROSS THE END OF A 24' PUBLIC ALLEY FOR A DISTANCE OF 2400 FEET TO � THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; N II ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90' 00' 00' FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27 C7 FEET (CHORD BEARS: S 87' 14' 17' W - 35,36 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE ON THE 1002W- NORTHEAST LINE OF GENERAL PARKWAY; - N 47' 45' 43' W ALONG THE NORTHEAST UNE OF GENERAL PARKWAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 65.00 r FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKYASE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; algin ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90' 00' 00" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27 I ( 1 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 02' 45' 43' W - 35.36 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE ON THE EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF DEACON DRIVE WEST; N 42' 14' 17' E FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.50 FEET; t N 47' 45' JS" W ACROSS DEACON DRIVE WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 85.00 FEET; I THENCE: CONTINUING THROUGH SAID REMAINDER OF 10088 ACRE TRACT AND ALONG THE EXTENSION OF THE NORTHWEST LINE OF DEACON DRIVE WEST FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS: ' N 42' 14' 17" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 140.54 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COUNTERCLOCKWISE j CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 532.50 FEET; 1, @1pYma0 of the Planning and Zoning Csnmes!m pt Bae FJIT M Utlege 5lptWn. Texas, hereby certify that the ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07' 01' 10" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 65.24 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 36' 43' 42' E - 65.20 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; I N 35' 13' 07" E FOR A OF 135.72 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COUNTERCLOCKWISE aPi 600.FE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF BOO,OD FEET; I ALONG SAID CURVE THROUON A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06' 38' 20' FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 69.52 I FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 31' 53' 57' E - 69.48 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; hN N28' 34' 47' E FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE ha ha HAVING A RADIUS OF 632.50 FEET; hp ha ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13' 39' 31' FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 150.78 g FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 35' 24' 32' E - 15042 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; 8 N 42' 14' 17' E FOR A DISTANCE OF 3.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COUNTERCLOCKWISE TAIL CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; �1 ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89' 18' 34" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 3697 / FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 02' 25' 00' W - 35.14 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF OLD WELLBORN ROAD MARKING THE NORTH CORNER OF THIS HEREIN I ---- ,1. DESCRIBED TRACT; I THENCE: S 47' 04' 17' E ALONG THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF OLD WELLBORN ROAD FOR A DISTANCE OF 1 589.21 FEET TO THE POINT QE­BEGINNINC CONTAINING 7.700 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, AS I SURVEYED ON THE GROUND. BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED ON GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION. TR LEGEND I PRIX+EkTY BOV1dW'/ RIGHT OF WAY c*i LOT LINE 2 ----------------------- EXIB%Nr. YAYAIENT ! -., T. `" - P13MIC MM RGL EASEMENT Q PROPERTY CDR ER L ! 2 ! 3 � � e>• Al. Heed e� » 1..1 PHASE 11C lI+ PUE` PU" LriuIY 1ASEMFJIT e PAE PWMD ACCISS EASEMENT I PBE Pill DRAY w EASF.AIENT 1 CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION STATE OF TEXAS N/F HEATH PHILLIPS INVESTMENTS, LLC REM OF JOB M AC 8627/73 ZONED PDD DEACON DRIVE WEST ROW VARIES - 48' PAVEMENT - - ' ----' PUBLIC ALLEY 3 24' ROW - 20' PAVFMFNT t DO' I I ly I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 � K' ITE -740.54' N II _2 C7 I I I I I 1002W- T3'w,•.• - OD r tAA9'� algin I ( 1 I y31'�.. .Js .. LOOK21 .. 541' 2 3 36 W - 9.3T. .DC 22 1, @1pYma0 of the Planning and Zoning Csnmes!m pt Bae FJIT M Utlege 5lptWn. Texas, hereby certify that the _ / \ etliehw plot wp[ d.J} oPprpxil by Ike Commission on the _ day of aPi 7gg hM hN hm ha ha ha hp ha $ g o 8 19s 0 g Chalrman� n II / `d $ It2 Im I= to to g to to a a h a �i c*i 2 ! ! 1 ! 2 ! 3 t lI+ 11 e I It I� I° IY a a a a a e a a y�. 17 I: la 4 fS ' I^ Iv 7 �r 8 I� I% 10 I+ ]1 12 13 14a 15 16 d 17 a 18 a 19 a 20 a +aJ' 1 {a v � n � N•I va r m Y r r Ih la la k k la le la F• fh ly h tY h ff R N f. j Ivr Iv P IN P - - ' ----' PUBLIC ALLEY 3 24' ROW - 20' PAVFMFNT t DO' I I ly I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 22 IyM 23 I 24 1 251� 26 1 I n ( I v { Iw u W27 28 }, 37 w Iw 4030 it. � . j1w 29 I 5 1I7w 41 mITNdI4[- NT 36 42 II C11 COUNTY OF BRAZOS CERTIFICATE OF THE SURVEYOR I, Heath Ph1lpa, IAanager of Heath Philips Inveelmenls, I.I.C. owner and STATE OF TEXAS tleveI.P., of the 7.854 acre Iraq shown on thle plat, and designated herein COUNTY OF BRAZOS as The Barracks II SubdlY.Ion, Phase 107. In the City of College Slallon, Teroa, and whose name Ie subs 'Ibed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of I, Brad Kerr, Registered Prolesi; �P ton9'Sin-yoc No; 4500, In (he Slate of the public (,raver all streets, alleys, parks, greenways, InfrasWcture, Teras. hereby certify that this plat H True Y e L 'e6 .woe prepared ante and public places thereon shown for the purpose and conalderollon from an dual eu y of the properly and that IM Ftr, y marker, and therein qr. d All such tletlleollona shall ba N1 lee simple unlen erpreesiy monuments ware placetl under my sooaNleeO M Ute glaw.a provldw a(hu'lee. Philips, Manager STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS Belpre e, ,Ile wM.. d IueNty, art ads daynperaonally appeared Heolh PhIA" k- 1, o t, be the per ek,m na ale subscrlbad to the CERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEER Iprego+p Inalrlwnenl, mid aLYnpeleeged 1, ms Ur,l he eeecuTed the tome fpr 1he'."pcx sn" dm desl.k,pN Ihsr.m amtad: I, -------------------- City Engineer of the City of College Slallon, Teras, hereby cerlNy that Iola he Citylo, College S to the requirements of Given under my hand and Beal an this ____ day of _______ the Subdlvielon Regulallons of the City of College Slollan, Teroa. 20__. City Engineer Notary Public, Brazo. Cmnly, Term NSET B IN I A KIMBER LANE 50' ROW - 27' PAVEMENT 23- t � N N II _2 I I I I I 1002W- �00I7" OD 27.P1. QU 73.00 I ( 1 I INSET A INSET B CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION N.T.S. _ .DC 22 1, @1pYma0 of the Planning and Zoning Csnmes!m pt Bae FJIT M Utlege 5lptWn. Texas, hereby certify that the _ / \ etliehw plot wp[ d.J} oPprpxil by Ike Commission on the _ day of aPi 7gg $ a o p o. BLOCK 22 J8S)OR_. Chalrman� / II / N.20 A ui w t t 2 ! ! 1 11 22 IyM 23 I 24 1 251� 26 1 I n ( I v { Iw u W27 28 }, 37 w Iw 4030 it. � . j1w 29 I 5 1I7w 41 mITNdI4[- NT 36 42 II C11 COUNTY OF BRAZOS CERTIFICATE OF THE SURVEYOR I, Heath Ph1lpa, IAanager of Heath Philips Inveelmenls, I.I.C. owner and STATE OF TEXAS tleveI.P., of the 7.854 acre Iraq shown on thle plat, and designated herein COUNTY OF BRAZOS as The Barracks II SubdlY.Ion, Phase 107. In the City of College Slallon, Teroa, and whose name Ie subs 'Ibed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of I, Brad Kerr, Registered Prolesi; �P ton9'Sin-yoc No; 4500, In (he Slate of the public (,raver all streets, alleys, parks, greenways, InfrasWcture, Teras. hereby certify that this plat H True Y e L 'e6 .woe prepared ante and public places thereon shown for the purpose and conalderollon from an dual eu y of the properly and that IM Ftr, y marker, and therein qr. d All such tletlleollona shall ba N1 lee simple unlen erpreesiy monuments ware placetl under my sooaNleeO M Ute glaw.a provldw a(hu'lee. Philips, Manager STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS Belpre e, ,Ile wM.. d IueNty, art ads daynperaonally appeared Heolh PhIA" k- 1, o t, be the per ek,m na ale subscrlbad to the CERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEER Iprego+p Inalrlwnenl, mid aLYnpeleeged 1, ms Ur,l he eeecuTed the tome fpr 1he'."pcx sn" dm desl.k,pN Ihsr.m amtad: I, -------------------- City Engineer of the City of College Slallon, Teras, hereby cerlNy that Iola he Citylo, College S to the requirements of Given under my hand and Beal an this ____ day of _______ the Subdlvielon Regulallons of the City of College Slollan, Teroa. 20__. City Engineer Notary Public, Brazo. Cmnly, Term NSET B IN I A KIMBER LANE 50' ROW - 27' PAVEMENT 23- t I IE Iw Ir I+ I' IIT„ I1 I[ It It. I� I, It1 12 1 I1., ;� 1� ....-it Ca 2 Ie 3 !� 4 I� 5 1+ 6 IY 7 Y� 8 Iv, 9 17 10 (. 11 I." 12 p 13 IF: 14 I� 15 �� 16 IT 17 Ir 18 I» 19 la 20 I+ 2111 P r f C C- fa 1�0 1= IQ N r N rT ry ry o r r: I e' na 42.001 1 27.00' 1 27.00' F7<1F.Ct'[ 27_pp' I 33 00' 33.00' 27.00' � N N II _2 I I I I I I IE Iw Ir I+ I' IIT„ I1 I[ It It. I� I, It1 12 1 I1., ;� 1� ....-it Ca 2 Ie 3 !� 4 I� 5 1+ 6 IY 7 Y� 8 Iv, 9 17 10 (. 11 I." 12 p 13 IF: 14 I� 15 �� 16 IT 17 Ir 18 I» 19 la 20 I+ 2111 P r f C C- fa 1�0 1= IQ N r N rT ry ry o r r: I e' na 42.001 1 27.00' 1 27.00' F7<1F.Ct'[ 27_pp' I 33 00' 33.00' 27.00' CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS I, ___________________. County Clerk, In Hes for pWd [aunty, M hereby cerllly (hal this plat (again. wRh Its eeltifi lee a( ep1ft-11 ltlpn a, feed lar record N my office the _ _ day pf 20___, In the Deed Record. of Brazos Ceunly, Tawe. M Vplavte Page -_-_. WITNESS my hand and official Seal, at my office In Bryan, Teroa County Clerk Bozo. Coanty, Te... � I � BLOCK 23 KIMBER LANE m ,rye - ar r1awD4n np�F•S; I. THE BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION, 2. NO PORTION OF THIS TRACT IS WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOGDPVVN ACCORDING TO THE F.E.M.A FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR BRAZOS COUNTY AND INCORPORATED AREAS, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 48041CO305F, EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/02/2014, J.THE ZONING OF THIS TRACT IS POD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT) 4, 1/2' IRON RODS WILL BE SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. STORM WATER DETENTION FACILITIES FOR THIS PHASE ARE LOCATED OFF SITE AND ARE TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA. 6. DISTANCES SHOWN ON CURVES AAE CHORD LENGTHS. 7, WATER SERVICE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PROVIDED BY WELLBORN SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT, A WATER DESIGN REPORT FOR THIS SUBDIVISION WILL BE PROVIDED PER CITY STANDARDS. B. ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PROVIDED BY BRYAN TEXAS UTILITIES (BTU). ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY BTU 9. THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN THE STEEPLECHASE SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE AREA- 10. EA10. LOTS ADJACENT TO PUBLIC ALLEY J MUST HAVE ACCESS SOLELY FROM THE ALLEY. 11. EACH LOT WILL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 2 TREES OF AT LEAST 2 INCHES IN CALIPER OR ONE 4 INCH CALIPER TREE PER ORDINANCE 3222. 12. PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED BY INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS. FENCES, GRADING, AND LANDSCAPE CANNOT IMPEDE THE FLOW IN THE PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT 13. COMPACTION OF FILL OR AN ENGINEERED SLAB 15 REQUIRED FOR LOTS THAT HAVE GREATER THAN 2 FEET OF FILL. THIS EFFECTS ALL OF THE LOTS EXCEPT FOR THE FOLLOWING: LOTS 16-21, BLOCK 23 Pst a4e X two z; s1SCLNar ufl' N.r le' )ri u w4v .4r 4k' 4J -w Hem' su• 11' rrs U I -W N -r b M.w' N1r 11' In w low N1r 1w Js•w L7 la.w' IqM Je' 4n M x))' Nor 14' In L' lee.11' H1Y I1' 11'E Lld JIAe' NeY pP'40Y VICINITY MAP FINAL PLAT THE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION PHASE 107 - 7.708 ACRES BLOCK 23, LOTS 1-21 BLOCIC 22, LOTS 22-42 BLOCK 21, LOTS 1-21 CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, A-7 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY 2015 SURVEYOR: ENGINEER: aMa r[RR, RP1x Na. 4.oi Use su.r[nrM, LLc S0.I Engineering, LLC 4a x..., AVL. sews. YSM +aAu aaa3lke nsa .-11 w., sun[ A 0[ a1R1gN, TMI.aS 7Ie1J a7a.)aaaw OWNER/DEVELOPER: NGIN FHIWa. -loo-, LLC ,.a. win zee W[11BaRN, T[rAS 71ee1 s7s.zza.eaoe SCALE: I"=40' � PHASE 10A rJ I ( 1 I I I I I ( 11 1 10 I I.•, 1 ;' I Is I 19 I Y: I 21 1 INSET A INSET B CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION N.T.S. _ N.T.S, 1, @1pYma0 of the Planning and Zoning Csnmes!m pt Bae FJIT M Utlege 5lptWn. Texas, hereby certify that the _ / \ etliehw plot wp[ d.J} oPprpxil by Ike Commission on the _ day of \ \ KIMBER LANE\ ` sa' Rat - 27' Prvul(rr \ BLOCK 22 I \ Chalrman� / / 22 1 23 \1 I a,4W 1 CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS I, ___________________. County Clerk, In Hes for pWd [aunty, M hereby cerllly (hal this plat (again. wRh Its eeltifi lee a( ep1ft-11 ltlpn a, feed lar record N my office the _ _ day pf 20___, In the Deed Record. of Brazos Ceunly, Tawe. M Vplavte Page -_-_. WITNESS my hand and official Seal, at my office In Bryan, Teroa County Clerk Bozo. Coanty, Te... � I � BLOCK 23 KIMBER LANE m ,rye - ar r1awD4n np�F•S; I. THE BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION, 2. NO PORTION OF THIS TRACT IS WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOGDPVVN ACCORDING TO THE F.E.M.A FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR BRAZOS COUNTY AND INCORPORATED AREAS, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 48041CO305F, EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/02/2014, J.THE ZONING OF THIS TRACT IS POD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT) 4, 1/2' IRON RODS WILL BE SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. STORM WATER DETENTION FACILITIES FOR THIS PHASE ARE LOCATED OFF SITE AND ARE TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA. 6. DISTANCES SHOWN ON CURVES AAE CHORD LENGTHS. 7, WATER SERVICE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PROVIDED BY WELLBORN SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT, A WATER DESIGN REPORT FOR THIS SUBDIVISION WILL BE PROVIDED PER CITY STANDARDS. B. ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PROVIDED BY BRYAN TEXAS UTILITIES (BTU). ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY BTU 9. THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN THE STEEPLECHASE SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE AREA- 10. EA10. LOTS ADJACENT TO PUBLIC ALLEY J MUST HAVE ACCESS SOLELY FROM THE ALLEY. 11. EACH LOT WILL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 2 TREES OF AT LEAST 2 INCHES IN CALIPER OR ONE 4 INCH CALIPER TREE PER ORDINANCE 3222. 12. PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED BY INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS. FENCES, GRADING, AND LANDSCAPE CANNOT IMPEDE THE FLOW IN THE PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT 13. COMPACTION OF FILL OR AN ENGINEERED SLAB 15 REQUIRED FOR LOTS THAT HAVE GREATER THAN 2 FEET OF FILL. THIS EFFECTS ALL OF THE LOTS EXCEPT FOR THE FOLLOWING: LOTS 16-21, BLOCK 23 Pst a4e X two z; s1SCLNar ufl' N.r le' )ri u w4v .4r 4k' 4J -w Hem' su• 11' rrs U I -W N -r b M.w' N1r 11' In w low N1r 1w Js•w L7 la.w' IqM Je' 4n M x))' Nor 14' In L' lee.11' H1Y I1' 11'E Lld JIAe' NeY pP'40Y VICINITY MAP FINAL PLAT THE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION PHASE 107 - 7.708 ACRES BLOCK 23, LOTS 1-21 BLOCIC 22, LOTS 22-42 BLOCK 21, LOTS 1-21 CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, A-7 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS JANUARY 2015 SURVEYOR: ENGINEER: aMa r[RR, RP1x Na. 4.oi Use su.r[nrM, LLc S0.I Engineering, LLC 4a x..., AVL. sews. YSM +aAu aaa3lke nsa .-11 w., sun[ A 0[ a1R1gN, TMI.aS 7Ie1J a7a.)aaaw OWNER/DEVELOPER: NGIN FHIWa. -loo-, LLC ,.a. win zee W[11BaRN, T[rAS 71ee1 s7s.zza.eaoe SCALE: I"=40' College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave (* 40r*�4 College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas j4&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File M 15-0519 Version: 1 Name: Caprock Crossing Blk. 1 & 2 - Final Plat Type: Replat Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/28/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Caprock Crossing Lot 3A -R, Block 1 and Lots 1A -R2, 3R, 4R and Common Area 1 R, Block 2 being a replat of Caprock Crossing Lot 3A, Block 1 and Lot 1A -R1 and Common Area 1, Block 2 and an unplatted 0.48 -acre tract A, Babille Survey, A-75 S.W. Robertson League, A-202 consisting of four lots and one common area on approximately 11.79 acres located at 1451 Greens Prairie Road West, generally located near the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and State Highway 6. Case #FPCO2015- 000005 (M. Thomas) Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Staff Report Application Final Plat Date Ver. Action By Action Result Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Caprock Crossing Lot 3A -R, Block 1 and Lots 1 A -R21 3R, 4R and Common Area 1 R, Block 2 being a replat of Caprock Crossing Lot 3A, Block 1 and Lot 1A -R1 and Common Area 1, Block 2 and an unplatted 0.48 -acre tract A, Babille Survey, A-75 S.W. Robertson League, A-202 consisting of four lots and one common area on approximately 11.79 acres located at 1451 Greens Prairie Road West, generally located near the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and State Highway 6. Case #FPCO2015- 000005 (M. Thomas) College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FINAL PLAT for Caprock Crossing Lot 3A -R, Block 1 and Lots 1A -R2, 3R, 4R and Common Area 1R, Block 2 being a replat of Caprock Crossing Lot 3A, Block 1 and Lot 1A -R1 and Common Area 1, Block 2 and a 0.48 -acre tract A, Babille Survey, A-75 S.W. Robertson League, A-202 FPCO2016-000005 SCALE: Four lots and one common area on 11.79 acres LOCATION: 1451 Greens Prairie Road West, generally located near the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and State Highway 6 ZONING: GC General Commercial OV Corridor Overlay APPLICANT: Jesse Durden, Brazos Texas Land Development, LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Madison Thomas, Staff Planner mthomas@cstx.gov PROJECT OVERVIEW: The proposed Final Plat replats two lots and one common area into four lots and one common area while incorporating an area of abandoned TxDOT right-of-way into the lots. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3 September 3, 2015 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1983 and 1993 Zoning: A -O Agricultural Open upon annexation A -O Agricultural Open to C-1 General Commercial District (1983 and 2014); Renamed GC General Commercial (2012) OV Corridor Overlay added (2006) Preliminary Plat: 2012 Site Development: Undeveloped COMMENTS Parkland Dedication: N/A Greenways: N/A Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks are required on both sides of each public way and will be constructed at the time of the site development. Bicycle Connectivity: N/A Impact Fees: The subject tract is located within the Alum Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area and will be required to pay $44.71/LUE (Living Unit Equivalent) at time of building permit. REVIEW CRITERIA Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with the Subdivision Requirements contained in the Unified Development Ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Copy of Final Plat Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3 September 3, 2015 (*40�r� [oYosCm�sGF.STAzmm Horne ofTexas Ad -M University' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: (Check one) F-1Minor Amending El Final DVaoatin0 FX� Rapat ($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) (*932) Is this plat in the ETJ? F-] Yes Fx�No Is this plat Commercial FX_1 orResidential F1 MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: $7O0-$932Final Plat Application Fee (see obove). to $233Waiver Request toSubdivision Regulations Fee (if app|ioob|o). 3600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Foo Foe in 1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600.the balance in due prior tothe issuance ofany plans ordevelopment pormit). Z Application completed infull. This application form provided bythe City ofCollege Station must beused and may not boadjusted oraltered. Please attach pages ifadditional information inprovided. �D Copy ofplat. (4signed my|ororiginal must besubmitted after opprova|.) FX] Grading, drainage, and erosion control plan with supporting drainage report. Z Public infrastructure plan and supporting documents (if app|ioab|e). �1 Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). �� Tide report for property current within ninety (90) days oraccompanied by o Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such on ownership, |ionu, encumbrances, etc. . smama-avu�V/ r4 %I L4#_ EJ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. �O The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. NOTE: /\ my|ar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before o final plat application will be considered complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed onsuch. Until the my|arhas been confirmed bystaff tobocorrect, the final plat application will be considered incomplete. Date ofOptional Pnaapp|icadonorStormwoharManagement Conference NAME OFPROJECT Caprock Crossing Block I&2Replat Y45Y6o�en�Pna��RoadN4x� ADDRESS lCaprock Crossing Lot 3A -R, Block Y&Lots ����4R, 5R&Common Area IR, Block | APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the projeo0: Name Jom»eDu/d«n -E-mail jeona.duxden@capnooktx.cnnr Wellborn�ky_____ State Texas Fax Number Revised 5/15 Page 1 of 9 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Brazos Texas Land Development, LLC E-mail lesse.durden@caprocktx.com Street Address P.O. Box 54 City wellborn State Texas Zip Code 77861 Phone Number 979.492.0425 Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name Schultz Engineering, LLC - Deven Doyen, P.E. Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A City College Station Phone Number 979.764.3900 E-mail eng@schultzengineeringllc.com State Texas Zip Code 77845 Fax Number 979.764.3910 Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑ Yes Fx No Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page No. Total Acreage 11.79 Total No. of Lots 6 R -O -W Acreage C Existing Use Commercial Proposed Use Commercial Number of Lots By Zoning District 6 / GC / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: Floodplain Acreage 0 Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? F-1 Yes [X No This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? 0 Yes [-1 No If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: Caprock Crossing (PP) City Project Number (if known): 12-00500093 I Date 1 Timeframe when submitted: 2012 Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 9 A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable): requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): 'VIA Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. V/A 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1. 0 An alternative pedestrian way or multi -use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2. E] The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan; 3. L] A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months; 4. F -I Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Pian with an estate / rural context; 5. E] When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi -use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan; Revised 5115 Page 3 of 9 6. F1 The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or 7. E:1 The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway / Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan - Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: N/A NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission. Requested Oversize ParticipationN/A Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: Streets Sidewalks 149 Sanitary Sewer Lines 300 Water Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes / Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: N/A No. of acres to be dedicated + $ N/A development fee N/A No, of acres in floodplain N/A No. of acres in detention N/A No. of acres in greenways 10M FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: NIA No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ N/A $ N/A NIA (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THiS APPLICATION iS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. if the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LiEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. Revised 5115 - is Date Wage 4 of 9 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re -issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. 7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre - pour) and post construction. 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE. Prope wner(s) Date Engineer Certification: 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. 1 will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. {, THE ENGINEER, D CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVE� .}.�'WVIAPPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE. ��„ � •« ** 5 $ # Na♦ 9 s a+ •x ; Engineer..t� . 1} $ .� Date Revised 5115 Page 5 of 9 The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only Permits:* A. I, certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study, that the alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not: (i) increase the Base Flood elevation; (ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor (v) increase Base Flood velocities. beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. WITISTOMM Initial * If a platting -status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate letter in lieu of certification. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits: M , certify to the following: (i) that any nonresidential or multi -family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 -year storm. Engineer Date Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments: C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. Engineer I Revised 5115 Page 6 of 9 Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate required). Residential Structures: D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre -pour) and post construction. Engineer/ Surveyor Commercial Structures: M Date , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation Engineer / Surveyor Date XV I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood -proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre - pour) and post construction. Engineer / Surveyor Conditions or comments as part of approval: Date Revised 5/15 Page 7 of 9 FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: (Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.) Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch. ❑x Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow. ❑x Title Block with the following information: 0 Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. Ox Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos County 911.) Ox Date of preparation. Engineer's scale in feet. 0 Total area intended to be developed. FXJ North Arrow. FX Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. N If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat. FX -1 Ownership and Dedication FX -1 Surveyor and/or Engineer City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat) FX Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat) R Brazos County Clerk ❑x Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only) R If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created. n If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code. n Location of the 100 -Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available data. 0 Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data. n Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2). 0 The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision). Existing Proposed 0 Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. n Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. Revised 5/15 Page 8 of 9 Existing Proposed Alleys. 0 0 Easements. FX -1 FX -1 A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially). Z ❑ Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. (❑x Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following: Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other utilities). Sewer Design Report. Fx Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) 0 Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report. Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) tp Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design, channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage layout of the subdivision. Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E. Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee / surety in accordance with UDO Section 8.6. Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary. PQ Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans). Z All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed. Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. R Are there impact fees associated with this development? R Yes ❑ No Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit. Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? ❑ Yes R No If yes, TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents. NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOI) must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit. Revised 5/15 Page 9 of 9 160 30 0 60 SCALE IN FEET _ _ '�' J / • VARIABLE ~ f d0' PUBLIC ACCCRI _:... .. }s IIJ11, TO BE ABANDONEDP5iWAM EiVAINADE k v •-~ r. / 687�/E1k'4�47 ` 2w PI1E ]0' PUliIK L.VYD51)APIHO.iA$EMENT �/ 11003/35 �� •.�- -- -- — UPLITV f EASEMENT _r - �'- - 30'PUE � — -- - C 1!' "VATE AC45i r7 11003/35 7 EASEMENT too' t, PRMAAE - l EASMENT 1231/37ELECiWCA0' 1f •.-- \ GROS.As�EAC1CNY i /�`� i• ,00X.36. Nwo UVIDDiXr"T, LLD� R aNRDax"Buc eR : oY�o 'chi' w l os Ir�el�arwrn.11c EASEMENT / r '••• L1� Dtl :i ayym� ' 11003/35 -/ .0 it LRcyVATE Y 'G• // 81001 •y PUE 1 PRNNACC / I VARkABLC 11003/35 CASEMENT f 1S rill / •/. Mg1H PUE 1,063/36 8460 / 10672/85 60' PUBLIC ACCESS, --71 PIKVATE DRAIN -M III a r LAM0SCAFE EASELENT \ - / 11003/75 / 20' WATERLINE f f 1 GPFI:\�PRAIII;E: / 40251/260 MVATE ACCESS 70' PUBLIC 055155, 10' TELL'IRN]r+a,rr,1T k� I EASEMENT LANDSCAPE E06WUF T � -- IIE ORlnµ/� NST LOT IA -R2 r 38' PUE / BLOCK 2 0460/1]r37 ACRES 20' PRIVATE gRA9fA0E A� •IC 1yr f/ EASEMENT 11003/35 EASE" .{r C ACCESS EASEMENT \ r / 11703/101 20' PRIVATE DRAINAGE { .pups TV.As EASEMENT 11743/101 1 LOT3R f F� ULOCK 2 '4 Ll LIC ACCESS 1.60 ACRES 2w PRIVATE 1DRAINANE1003/35 1 ' 118 PUE A -,11003j25 �w EASEMENT 1100)/JS —/ (• IIB9B/JO p m 20' PUE 4v)� . .� 1$, PUE ,1003/351- /f�f'T 17A3/L01 f 1Yp1 11098 30' PUE ~'I j `INSET l4l 1L PUE DETAIL 2 50' PUBLIC ACgM - \� k PRIVATE DRAINA� CASEMENT C A PAI 11090/Jo LOT 4K Imo "i D, BLOCK2 BLOCK? _ E; 2.73 ACRE _ oesea Rnw Nx- 110121 PUE 1100]/]5 2D AVE \\\\0 / Zf `Y EASEMENT 11007/35 I ; I 0- I I 1 r�IY�TE A4CF5 L WIMENr — recd1;1- 11 $4 WILL 11hh L) FIM 11 PK'WV .At N87• 29' 571. \ 290.03' 4 m �uP� M.v OasiAq 4r.Ir e4rwel'E 47 Ww. m ryarm-rY era 1/so' xss'1et ;e }mer• enr11'ro7r Lr Irl.n' IUA40' 4ur4e6Y I7d.»' en.er rsla•e1ti alar .tom Inter n.7r W1[ 4V 307E - W;W NST AEP - 9103' _ ...\ 10' PILE 12280/63 - +� - 12 5' PUE 7.5• UE f/ I \ \• P / 14007/35 TIE MIILIC A=55. JJ f I NIRNBCE-Q:L� J I 7 I �r1/l fl C7 vivii € QMSR ~ "I— PReI ORAINAOg R LANDSCAPE EASEMENT It00J/JS f N 1%9111 W rT •I _� I1. r „ 1 'tI'I IT ljJ ,i'- Tf � CASEMENT 2D'DWATER3/35 LINE EASEMENT •i 4021/260 "Mr cwR MK, 21 � PRIYATE DEAS(RCN1 I -`� zoriio �s+w fSV .1 .v / S'��% �' 111 11173/221 EAS�suNT / -VARIABL1; �E NdTll PLIE � + pp tas72/66 ,runo�+'cao° uc l { ZIA 7 1 /fl ' Pil IE ORAIIIAC2: EASEMENT 11007/JS f! : / t 1,07 M•IIFK; ' Ix40 ui w i WTA. P� 1 1 _ _ '�' J / • VARIABLE ~ f d0' PUBLIC ACCCRI _:... .. }s IIJ11, TO BE ABANDONEDP5iWAM EiVAINADE k v •-~ r. / 687�/E1k'4�47 ` 2w PI1E ]0' PUliIK L.VYD51)APIHO.iA$EMENT �/ 11003/35 �� •.�- -- -- — UPLITV f EASEMENT _r - �'- - 30'PUE � — -- - C 1!' "VATE AC45i r7 11003/35 7 EASEMENT too' t, PRMAAE - l EASMENT 1231/37ELECiWCA0' 1f •.-- \ GROS.As�EAC1CNY i /�`� i• ,00X.36. Nwo UVIDDiXr"T, LLD� R aNRDax"Buc eR : oY�o 'chi' w l os Ir�el�arwrn.11c EASEMENT / r '••• L1� Dtl :i ayym� ' 11003/35 -/ .0 it LRcyVATE Y 'G• // 81001 •y PUE 1 PRNNACC / I VARkABLC 11003/35 CASEMENT f 1S rill / •/. Mg1H PUE 1,063/36 8460 / 10672/85 60' PUBLIC ACCESS, --71 PIKVATE DRAIN -M III a r LAM0SCAFE EASELENT \ - / 11003/75 / 20' WATERLINE f f 1 GPFI:\�PRAIII;E: / 40251/260 MVATE ACCESS 70' PUBLIC 055155, 10' TELL'IRN]r+a,rr,1T k� I EASEMENT LANDSCAPE E06WUF T � -- IIE ORlnµ/� NST LOT IA -R2 r 38' PUE / BLOCK 2 0460/1]r37 ACRES 20' PRIVATE gRA9fA0E A� •IC 1yr f/ EASEMENT 11003/35 EASE" .{r C ACCESS EASEMENT \ r / 11703/101 20' PRIVATE DRAINAGE { .pups TV.As EASEMENT 11743/101 1 LOT3R f F� ULOCK 2 '4 Ll LIC ACCESS 1.60 ACRES 2w PRIVATE 1DRAINANE1003/35 1 ' 118 PUE A -,11003j25 �w EASEMENT 1100)/JS —/ (• IIB9B/JO p m 20' PUE 4v)� . .� 1$, PUE ,1003/351- /f�f'T 17A3/L01 f 1Yp1 11098 30' PUE ~'I j `INSET l4l 1L PUE DETAIL 2 50' PUBLIC ACgM - \� k PRIVATE DRAINA� CASEMENT C A PAI 11090/Jo LOT 4K Imo "i D, BLOCK2 BLOCK? _ E; 2.73 ACRE _ oesea Rnw Nx- 110121 PUE 1100]/]5 2D AVE \\\\0 / Zf `Y EASEMENT 5 DAD.- D R T 1] Dx.U,F 15' PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT A 215.0 70' ruE IfAO!/Yr J 20' PUE w5pp UM%rOLVELOP 1 LLC oxEDwcsc7BEoaK ] Ap• 507E - 2055.00' - UE /30 I --44T 40' 297E - BB.1B' — — — M4i Alf. 5b'E - li 1 I I9' AO' 13,50'.. 10.18' IZJ 48^ T — \ \ G; �11ee15E1(ENi °LLE ��f�1n7.6' 3115 /144 110I/Jn VAll I •' way 1NL •� / i 1 1 I f 12w rME I 1, I � / r46.1 "I I. 30• PRIVATE ]y cum I CROSS AOCE54 f // 1 EASEMDIT FI10G3/JD; r� •Iy 1473/27. r b y Ar�r� j / VAfii C J 1./1J7IA•N I WIDTH PUE Jl x 07 .' 11117CK 1 (./ 10672/86 JI/1h+.3.01 �- ro BE A9NiG 20' ME ONFA ` r , PUP. DETAIL I 20' PRIVATE OBNNAGI EASEMENT 11001 �2B' PUE I100 /35 I J f , 46. �•E — 46' 50'0' - i5m5Y FEE — - 50• PULpIC ALCCIS e--„ J k I+RrvAir DRAINAGE 2w 8030/5 -1 a'•'i � :w: ue m.rD°tae i w 9 A 11898/JO PUE U:,FAll.2 11007/35 I ; I 0- I I 1 r�IY�TE A4CF5 L WIMENr — i, M. If 4141k9p. N87• 29' 571. \ 290.03' 4 PRIVATE ACCESS I!ASL'ML'N1T DETAIL 5 DAD.- D R T 1] Dx.U,F 15' PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT A 215.0 70' ruE IfAO!/Yr J 20' PUE w5pp UM%rOLVELOP 1 LLC oxEDwcsc7BEoaK ] Ap• 507E - 2055.00' - UE /30 I --44T 40' 297E - BB.1B' — — — M4i Alf. 5b'E - li 1 I I9' AO' 13,50'.. 10.18' IZJ 48^ T — \ \ G; �11ee15E1(ENi °LLE ��f�1n7.6' 3115 /144 110I/Jn VAll I •' way 1NL •� / i 1 1 I f 12w rME I 1, I � / r46.1 "I I. 30• PRIVATE ]y cum I CROSS AOCE54 f // 1 EASEMDIT FI10G3/JD; r� •Iy 1473/27. r b y Ar�r� j / VAfii C J 1./1J7IA•N I WIDTH PUE Jl x 07 .' 11117CK 1 (./ 10672/86 JI/1h+.3.01 �- ro BE A9NiG 20' ME ONFA ` r , PUP. DETAIL I 20' PRIVATE OBNNAGI EASEMENT 11001 �2B' PUE I100 /35 I J f , 46. �•E — 46' 50'0' - i5m5Y FEE — - 50• PULpIC ALCCIS e--„ J k I+RrvAir DRAINAGE 2w 8030/5 -1 a'•'i � :w: ue m.rD°tae i w 9 A 11898/JO PUE U:,FAll.2 NOTES, 1. BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION. 2. NO PORTION OF THIS TRACT IS WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ACCORDING TO THE F.E.M.A. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR BRAZOS COUNTY AND INCORPORATED AREAS, MAP N0, 48041CO325E, EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 16, 2012 3. 1/2- IRON RODS WILL BE SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4, DISTANCES SHOWN ON CURVES ARE CHORD LENGTHS - 5 THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED GC k OV. ALL LOTS ARE PROPOSED TO BE COMMERCIAL USES. 6 BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON IS HONORING THE PLAT CALLED BEARINGS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAY RECORDED IN VOL. 11743. PG. 35 AND AS MONUMENTED ON THEGROUND. 7. THE COMMON AREAS, PUBLIC WAYS AND PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, THE OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PRIVATE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL BE BY EACH LOT OWNER OR THE PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION B. BLOCK 2 WILL BE CONSIDERED 2 BUILDING PLOTS SEPARATED BY THE PUBLIC WAY, 9. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE ALUM CREEK IMPACT FEE AREA, 10,1/2• IRON RODS AT ALL EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR PROPERTY CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS, AS REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION REGULATION OF THE CRY OF COLLEGE STATION AN X• IN CONCRETE FOR ALL PROPERTY CORNERS FALLING WITHIN DRIVES AND PARKING AREAS. 41, THE FOLLOWING BLANKET EASEMENTS DO APPLY TO THIS PROPERTY SHOWN HERON: CITY OF BRYAN 213/509 HUMBLE PIPELINE CO, 48/514 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION (TEMPORARY) 11020/28 WELLBORN WATER SUPPLY CORP. 607/118 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. OF THE SOUTH WEST 555/347 CITY OF BRYAN 516/753 CITY OF BRYAN 428/255 APPLIES TO 3.205 ACRE TRACT 12, THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS TRACT: CITY OF BRYAN 141/481 AS RELEASED 11052 12 ( fi WELLBORN WATER SUPPLY CORP. 273/408 CITU OF COLLEGE STATION 9924/238 13. PUBLIC WAYS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF UNDEVELOPED TRACTS_ LEGEND 1-11 Doun- - u -TY EA -N, (PaE) jcwNON ARE -iV" —er arANL. eseNErr PROPOSED —c A[C[55 FASEUENI W.A E ) ExsTlNc PueLlc u— EASEu1Nr (P-) - - - - - - -- -- - - 1— PUBUc —A. EAxuExT (P D,I) r"z aeDul glEIeDIT [XSTMa Peeec ACCT55 EASEUENT (P.A.E) PRro - C~R VICINITY MAP CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS 1, Se1ea M, 1Neeg, IadlMdudfy end os P-Riden! I Serwa I.mall, LLC, the ned.rat Pother o! &atn4 lean. Lund BwrNepn.nl, LLC° aenrr J dnelapw r the Iona, slrowm aA this Not. end Wa'ynI`= hvNn w 11a Caprock Crasllnq IM JA -it, O ed 1, Lala to -R2, 3R, IR, eM C- Aree FI "- 2, !o IKe Ll kyyr� pl 4411 11, 1* i Terns, Bend .base rwme u wbarfeml berate, nnl •M1y ee Il Ln W the use r Ha IrubKe hewer na attest.. Ilvys,, ppNkF greenwny. x+Irm -lure, --I. and 1,401'e 0la[ee 14- .u.a lnnwea,, lethe -a- rt alMeed All deJc9inn 4:11 h. N ladnlm.Poeeway .,rV4d SO, M Ismail, IndiVduolly and President STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS Uefvv me, the M1 derlglled aMlflallLy, on Phis any personally oppemed Sdsm im Iail, Un.e. le mo to V. I.. O.,- whax namet sub rcrSed la the foregoing nnl, and oceac•ledg 0 le me Phot heexecuted the some for the purpose and OInereb 6 .-weroon. 1.11 Given under my bond and sed on Ibis ____ doy OI ___________.. 20___ Notary Public, Brazos County. Texos CERTIFICATE OF THE SURVEYOR STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS 1. Brod Kerr Re islered Prol s not Land Surve or No. 4502 n the Stole I 9 1 le o Teras Y hereby cerlily Thal Anis pial hol the and correct and w s prepared from on actual uncleof Ane properly one mal .n properly markers one monuments wee placed my eupervisian on the ground. . R.P.L S. No. 4502 CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS I, -7 __ __________, Ceunly Clerk. in and for said county, do hereby cerlily Thal This plot logemer with its car Lincoles of ou then llca lion woe rded for record IA my oNl . the _ __ doy of 20___, M the Deed Records of B—. Coun ly, Texas, w Vo Nme ______ Page _--___- WITNESS my bond and omciol Seal, It my oIfi,, Iv Bryon, Texos Caunty Clnk Braeee C-ly, T- CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMISSION 1. _ ___ _______ Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Cd I"' Slolian, Texas, hereby cerlily that the attached plot ora. duly approved by the Commission on the ____ day of ___________________ Ch Ylfmaa CERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEER 1. hereb Llly Engineer of the City of College Stepan, T...% y cerlily that this Subtlivi.- conforms to the r.Wkem.ne of the SubdlA.1D,, Regula Llom of the City of College Station, Texas. City Engineer D1,wu[ 7 MwTn ea.,l teiAea ANx 1wRo arc cwrinYllc+xw c7 i-- smm er vw v,n1'm "ear q n eebae+nsr,W IUM' Ir.N• cj 1e 1—It—lar !aw -w- 40.4' sf1'ae'fll u uer F-- Teerw•1r 21w 4r.Ir e4rwel'E 47 Ww. m ryarm-rY era 1/so' xss'1et Ce 7n57 Auw w1•Iy4u• ILLrI• }mer• enr11'ro7r Lr Irl.n' IUA40' 4ur4e6Y I7d.»' en.er rsla•e1ti alar .tom Inter n.7r bar 1WrIrN]s NOTES, 1. BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION. 2. NO PORTION OF THIS TRACT IS WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ACCORDING TO THE F.E.M.A. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR BRAZOS COUNTY AND INCORPORATED AREAS, MAP N0, 48041CO325E, EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 16, 2012 3. 1/2- IRON RODS WILL BE SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4, DISTANCES SHOWN ON CURVES ARE CHORD LENGTHS - 5 THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED GC k OV. ALL LOTS ARE PROPOSED TO BE COMMERCIAL USES. 6 BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON IS HONORING THE PLAT CALLED BEARINGS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAY RECORDED IN VOL. 11743. PG. 35 AND AS MONUMENTED ON THEGROUND. 7. THE COMMON AREAS, PUBLIC WAYS AND PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, THE OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PRIVATE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL BE BY EACH LOT OWNER OR THE PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION B. BLOCK 2 WILL BE CONSIDERED 2 BUILDING PLOTS SEPARATED BY THE PUBLIC WAY, 9. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE ALUM CREEK IMPACT FEE AREA, 10,1/2• IRON RODS AT ALL EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR PROPERTY CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS, AS REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION REGULATION OF THE CRY OF COLLEGE STATION AN X• IN CONCRETE FOR ALL PROPERTY CORNERS FALLING WITHIN DRIVES AND PARKING AREAS. 41, THE FOLLOWING BLANKET EASEMENTS DO APPLY TO THIS PROPERTY SHOWN HERON: CITY OF BRYAN 213/509 HUMBLE PIPELINE CO, 48/514 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION (TEMPORARY) 11020/28 WELLBORN WATER SUPPLY CORP. 607/118 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. OF THE SOUTH WEST 555/347 CITY OF BRYAN 516/753 CITY OF BRYAN 428/255 APPLIES TO 3.205 ACRE TRACT 12, THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS TRACT: CITY OF BRYAN 141/481 AS RELEASED 11052 12 ( fi WELLBORN WATER SUPPLY CORP. 273/408 CITU OF COLLEGE STATION 9924/238 13. PUBLIC WAYS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF UNDEVELOPED TRACTS_ LEGEND 1-11 Doun- - u -TY EA -N, (PaE) jcwNON ARE -iV" —er arANL. eseNErr PROPOSED —c A[C[55 FASEUENI W.A E ) ExsTlNc PueLlc u— EASEu1Nr (P-) - - - - - - -- -- - - 1— PUBUc —A. EAxuExT (P D,I) r"z aeDul glEIeDIT [XSTMa Peeec ACCT55 EASEUENT (P.A.E) PRro - C~R VICINITY MAP CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS 1, Se1ea M, 1Neeg, IadlMdudfy end os P-Riden! I Serwa I.mall, LLC, the ned.rat Pother o! &atn4 lean. Lund BwrNepn.nl, LLC° aenrr J dnelapw r the Iona, slrowm aA this Not. end Wa'ynI`= hvNn w 11a Caprock Crasllnq IM JA -it, O ed 1, Lala to -R2, 3R, IR, eM C- Aree FI "- 2, !o IKe Ll kyyr� pl 4411 11, 1* i Terns, Bend .base rwme u wbarfeml berate, nnl •M1y ee Il Ln W the use r Ha IrubKe hewer na attest.. Ilvys,, ppNkF greenwny. x+Irm -lure, --I. and 1,401'e 0la[ee 14- .u.a lnnwea,, lethe -a- rt alMeed All deJc9inn 4:11 h. N ladnlm.Poeeway .,rV4d SO, M Ismail, IndiVduolly and President STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS Uefvv me, the M1 derlglled aMlflallLy, on Phis any personally oppemed Sdsm im Iail, Un.e. le mo to V. I.. O.,- whax namet sub rcrSed la the foregoing nnl, and oceac•ledg 0 le me Phot heexecuted the some for the purpose and OInereb 6 .-weroon. 1.11 Given under my bond and sed on Ibis ____ doy OI ___________.. 20___ Notary Public, Brazos County. Texos CERTIFICATE OF THE SURVEYOR STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS 1. Brod Kerr Re islered Prol s not Land Surve or No. 4502 n the Stole I 9 1 le o Teras Y hereby cerlily Thal Anis pial hol the and correct and w s prepared from on actual uncleof Ane properly one mal .n properly markers one monuments wee placed my eupervisian on the ground. . R.P.L S. No. 4502 CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS I, -7 __ __________, Ceunly Clerk. in and for said county, do hereby cerlily Thal This plot logemer with its car Lincoles of ou then llca lion woe rded for record IA my oNl . the _ __ doy of 20___, M the Deed Records of B—. Coun ly, Texas, w Vo Nme ______ Page _--___- WITNESS my bond and omciol Seal, It my oIfi,, Iv Bryon, Texos Caunty Clnk Braeee C-ly, T- CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMISSION 1. _ ___ _______ Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Cd I"' Slolian, Texas, hereby cerlily that the attached plot ora. duly approved by the Commission on the ____ day of ___________________ Ch Ylfmaa CERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEER 1. hereb Llly Engineer of the City of College Stepan, T...% y cerlily that this Subtlivi.- conforms to the r.Wkem.ne of the SubdlA.1D,, Regula Llom of the City of College Station, Texas. City Engineer �` EM LSO 70' PUBLIC nCCUL ( 21Y PRIVATE CROSS PRIVATE DRAINAGE kACCESS EASEMENT LA 6CAFE EASEIi(NT iI ep. +1003/35 k 1100]/35 1 -'- - - --/ V 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT 1111 Y /260 4021 ` LOTaac. 60' POVA M' ACES rA61/"T YANrAHI F. zo�/t`t ' CN 755 AUE53 '! 111]]/229 wm H PUE zaxo w : E4SEY[,1T i 10672/0euz LAr Lc 1t077/JS ,/ l,+ r` fI• � � � AID' MVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT 7J 1100)%JS � o Id TEL[YIIDT4i:' ! 6O' PUBLIC A7[E5$, -- `f• r- 5L11ENt ^� PRLVAIt pRAjkAGp &• /� .-• % 601/+44 7B' C PUBLIC EALZSCAP11HI' NP LOD3/35 PUE 11003/35 , 1 100' pF.CTMtA1 / / '•, �f J0 PRIVAif - EASMENT 1251,,]]8 ' r a / ��.� `;\• CROS(A.1r.MCESj f f1II 11Cp3/]5� ` .fir 1 " xESL� 50' PUfiLN% aRAi ,rd o[HEw.tM. uf: DXOcC x w / ACCESS EASEMENT 11003/35 PUE •' ` zoAfa ui w 1 10' PRIVATE _ OHhIHALC� 1 pul1ATT1TABLE 11003/35 EASCMEbi r (g� �� / f 10672/66 rmVA1C0AR1LICAAfC { A 1700s/3s {ANIISCAPE FA05EWNY 03/35 20' WATERLINE tU WEST E4A2b1/B26.�r `' rl/ - ]d ccr TE DR AGE A, 1 / 10' TRE740W �. 'AND%E E ATIAGE jT 1 Y EA5EM1 cNT�7-[` IAWAP[EM^EAIEHT - - - 601h 44 s�r 11003/35 70' I'VFl/�•% / /r } 20' PRIVATE BRA04ACE 20' PUP -4 D47DI+ EASEMENT 11003/35 4 Iv- \~9u61C ACCESS EASEMENT TR:?1. IL 1'1 J 11743/101 I -�1 4E•• m' PRIVATE DRAINAGE \ f FASEAIRHT 1174}/1p1 INN 20' PRIVATE DRAYAGE • UA5E EN1 i'ASCM(nT T1003/M .tib,.-•- /� ' - i KoDalpal yd a7' til[ j Te PILE. �� 1TtNs/1.pT ..,N43' 4 30 E f . 01 '��a -• �h\�\tom\\tiilhl�n�7%r5;1'f` \\\\\\� �4�\`�"� oti20 Cul c IIDOJ/35 ��\�\\ti\\\`\`✓QY 1 (I1 enAz TExAs LAV6E��oPVrn, LLC I I is �tisw 77' RUE 11696/30 �,'tE1B MT �'W4o – - 70, PUE ,169a/a'1 1 i x�-i611 PNILIC ACCESS �/ 'l PRl/VAW30 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 11896/30 Y �z ON 20 PG CUE 11690/30 -1, .clroeimsaiTrox 12 2 './:w 20' PUC• 6(i3o/D G51�£/E c �S T CO. LLC w gCBEaROx ORIGINAL PLAT VOL. 11898 & PG. 31 srwrr, GEE• Ar f1Y LINE TAIIUC c I. F --C, LEGEND VICINITY MAP Iw,vE I L[wm, w•clusOELTA UW- crwro Tno1Te 1Taaa 1 cx 1AA[cnow rui OAii eT0 11931r wo Do' o E1sT 4.Ar WI'or.11 �.M4'Ir'b•W a, n.n• T+a-0o' mr1YTr uw 2— 1 w�Ar4n _ —2' ' 1,•E e„ .f,.w' mm' A1eYdw• p.r ,ss x N,1'x3,4. ELfI wr v'r cy 9..wY .o5 w" mwa4.1A• 1+.9r Al N' TArar3TT w'erE cu ma Team•TE' EAr u�a• s.4v,Et rEr xt cu ,v3,' assay wE17.� n,.a,• wlwu•4ar .r wYw 7= t`- PROJECT LOCATION -•I• n NOT TO SCA I.F. —Y LOT wE —RPitlw IWt VIAt1T G]tYb1r V-Mq — — — — �. r _ nrccxP .wx,Q R+AAu.c,A1rWTT PRO -CO Pu1AK AEEE== EENT (RAE.) �.• T T,R1,R,MfiC UIUn E "AW Oun - - -- -- - -- 1>m11K. 1.11wX 4rwArt EATLnNT Tw4A0 Q. ACCESS I—E"T (P A E) PRor3wTY C— VICINITY MAP Iw,vE I L[wm, w•clusOELTA UW- crwro Tno1Te 1Taaa 1 cx 1AA[cnow rui OAii eT0 11931r wo Do' o E1sT 4.Ar WI'or.11 �.M4'Ir'b•W a, n.n• T+a-0o' mr1YTr uw 2— 1 w�Ar4n _ —2' ' 1,•E e„ .f,.w' mm' A1eYdw• p.r ,ss x N,1'x3,4. ELfI wr v'r cy 9..wY .o5 w" mwa4.1A• 1+.9r Al N' TArar3TT w'erE cu ma Team•TE' EAr u�a• s.4v,Et rEr xt cu ,v3,' assay wE17.� n,.a,• wlwu•4ar .r wYw 7= t`- PROJECT LOCATION -•I• n NOT TO SCA I.F. _ College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexivA&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File #: 15-0486 Version: 1 Name: 408 Nimitz & 409 Eisenhower- Rezoning Type: Rezoning Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/21/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from D Duplex to GC General Commercial for approximately 0.499 acres being Lots 3 & 10, Block B and a portion of the Alley of the College Heights Subdivision, generally located at 408 Nimitz Street and 409 Eisenhower Street, more generally located north of University Drive East and south of Cooner Street. Case #REZ2015-000012 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change) Sponsors: Mark Bombek Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Staff Report Application Rezoning Map Date Ver. Action By Action Result Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from D Duplex to GC General Commercial for approximately 0.499 acres being Lots 3 & 10, Block B and a portion of the Alley of the College Heights Subdivision, generally located at 408 Nimitz Street and 409 Eisenhower Street, more generally located north of University Drive East and south of Cooner Street. Case #REZ2015-000012 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change) College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM (*0Fq" CITY OF COTJ.FGF, STATTON Home of Texas A&M University' REZONING REQUEST FOR 408 Nimitz Street and 409 Eisenhower Street REZ2016-0000012 REQUEST: D Duplex to GC General Commercial SCALE: 0.499 acres LOCATION: Generally located north of University Drive East and south of Cooner Street, on Lots 3 & 10, Block B of the College Heights Subdivision and Portion of a 0.10 acre tract being the remainder of the 15' alley of the said block B as abandoned by the City of College Station in Ordinance 2013-3491, College Station, Brazos County, Texas. Said tract being recorded in Volume 124, Page 259 of the official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. APPLICANT: PROJECT MANAGER: RECOMMENDATION: Planning & Zoning Commission September 3, 2015 Fadi Kalaouze, Aggieland Outfitters Mark Bombek, Staff Planner mbombek@cstx.gov Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. Page 1 of 5 o �s �J O) 9 CD 0� � i Tai �O�j '�JO OSA J / r 3.ip'SS�a� cx:> r gr z Lam) O) ■ � o `fib CD o. rn V t+i CD C`7 d N Pi NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 3, 2015 Advertised Council Hearing Date: September 21, 2015 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Property owner notices mailed Contacts in support: Contacts in opposition: Inquiry contacts: ADJACENT LAND USES 29 None at the time of the report. None at the time of the report. None at the time of the report. Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Urban Redevelopment Area D Duplex Single-family homes South Urban GC General Aggieland Outfitters Redevelopment Area Commercial East (Across Nimitz Urban P -MUD Planned Mixed Benjamin Knox Gallery Street) Redevelopment Area Use District West (Across Urban Proposed PDD Future Hotel Eisenhower Street) Redevelopment Area DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1951 Zoning: R-2 Duplex Residential upon annexation, renamed D Duplex (2013) Final Plat: College Heights Subdivision (1938) Site development: Both properties are developed as single-family residential REVIEW CRITERIA Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is designated as Urban on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map and is also located within Redevelopment Area II. The redevelopment area designation was identified due to the property's proximity to one of the busiest of the city's corridors. Additionally, the underperforming land uses and small lot configuration have made it difficult to assemble land for redevelopment. Intense development consisting of high-density residential activities is allowed. General commercial and office uses, business parks, and vertical mixed-use activities may also be permitted when property is also designated to lie within a growth or redevelopment area. Given the Urban designation and being within a redevelopment area, the proposed request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The current zoning of D Duplex is compatible with the immediately adjacent properties and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Urban. However, the proposed rezoning of GC General Commercial will allow the property owner the ability to expand their currently existing general commercial development fronting University Drive East. Under the current development guidelines the property owner will be required to meet such standards related to landscaping and nonresidential architectural relief and others that will aid in allowing a more compatible development with the surrounding uses. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: A rezoning to GC General Commercial would be compatible with area redevelopment and meets the property owner's intent to expand the adjacent commercial use. The surrounding area is currently experiencing an increase in redevelopment and interest to consolidate property for the purposes of redevelopment. The allowance of the proposed rezoning is helping to meet the demand for more intense commercial activity along the University Drive corridor. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The only uses permitted by the existing district are for residential activities. The property owner owns a retail use immediately adjacent to the subject property and is looking to expand the store to accommodate the much needed growth of their business. The existing duplex land use is suitable, but does not allow for the consolidation of property and other redevelopment opportunities intended under the Comprehensive Plan designation. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property could remain D Duplex, but allowing GC General Commercial would improve its marketability and consistency with the adjacent property fronting University Drive East. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water distribution lines immediately adjacent to the property may be undersized for the proposed use and necessitate improvements by the developer with further site development. The newly constructed Cooner Street sanitary sewer has sufficient capacity, however sewer upgrades from the subject property to the Cooner Street sewer main may be required at the time of site development. Additionally, a sanitary sewer line crossing the property may need to be relocated depending on proposed site layout. The subject property is located in the Burton Creek Drainage Basin and development of the subject property is required to meet the minimum standards of the City's Storm Water Design Guidelines. The subject property is not encroached by a Special Flood Hazard Area per FEMA FIRM Panel 215F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Rezoning map CITY Of' COLId cl; STATION Horne of Texas A&ill University* FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: STAFF: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) .. LICATIO GENERAL I MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ❑x $1,165 Rezoning Application Fee. x� Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request. Fx-] One (1) copy of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. 0 Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). R A CAD (dxfldwg) - model space State Plane NAD 83 or GIS (Shp) digital file (e-mailed to Osdigttalsubrrital c@rx cstx.g v) NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference N/A NAME OF PROJECT Aggieland Outfitters - Phase II ADDRESS 408 Nimitz Street & 409 Eisenhower Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Lots 3 & 10, Block B of the College Heights Sub. & Portion of Alley GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY, IF NOT PLATTED: APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Fadi Kalaouze - Aggieland Outfitters E-mail fadi.kalaouze@kalcorp.com Street Address 360 Graham Road City College Station Phone Number 979.775.8151 ext 202 ..;. # WMTf rrVflr Name Nimitz Properties, LLC Street Address•t Graham Road s - State Texas Zip Code 77845 E-mail fadi.kalaouzeo@kalcorp.com State Texas 10/10 Page 1 of 3 OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.): Name Schultz Engineering, LLC - Joe Schultz, P.E. E-mail eng@schultzengineeringllc,com Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A City College Station Phone Number 979.764.3900 This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated of the Brazos County Official Records. State Texas Zip Code 77845 Fax Number 979- 764.3910 and recorded in Volume Existing Zoning R-2 Duplex Proposed Zoning GC General Commercial Present Use of Property Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property General Commercial - Expansion of Aggieland Outfitters REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION WEM List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. Aggieland Outfitters consolidated and redeveloped several tracts along University Drive into their flagship retail facility. Given their unprecedented success, there is an immediate need for expansion. Additional property has been acquired to expand the existing footprint to accommodate retail sales, internet sales and corporate operations. 2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. The zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and the abutting Aggieland Outfitters facility. Granting the zoning change from duplex to general commercial will allow the expansion of the existing store. 1 How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The proposed general commercial zoning request is compatible with the present Aggieland Outfitters zoning and surrounding land uses. The overall character of the neighborhood will be maintained with the proposed general commercial zoning district and the neighborhood protection standards in the City's Unified Development Ordinance. 10/10 Page 2 of 3 4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The property is suitable for general commercial land uses as demonstrated by the abutting Aggieland Outfitters flagship retail store. Redevelopment opportunities along University Drive such as Montelongo's and Benjamin Knox's Gallery have proven that commercial land uses are suitable in this area. 5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The existing R-2 Duplex zoning district does not allow for redevelopment opportunities on the subject property. The existing single family homes will be redeveloped and incorporated into the Aggieland Outfitters facility. 6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The redevelopment potential of the subject property is extremely limited under the current duplex zoning district. 7. List any other reasons to support this zone change. The owners of Aggieland Outfitters successfully redeveloped the abutting property from a mix of underperforming office and residential land uses into thriving retail store along University Drive. They have been so successful that they need additional property to expand their current operations. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. Signature and title Date 10/10 1 �� ��� - Page 3 of 3 WORTH ACQUISITIONS, LLC COLLEGE HEIGHTS BLOCK B. LOT 9 ZONED D 9262/103 NIMITZ PROPERTIES, LLC. COLLEGE HEIGHTS It BLOCK B. LOT 10 EXISTING ZONING D 12488/144 LOT 10 BLOCK 'B' REMAINDER OF 0.10 ACRE PORTION OF 15' ALLEY PER ORDINANCE 2013-3491 II I 0.499 ACRES EXISTING ZONING D -DUPLEX PROPOSED ZONING GC - GENERAL COMMERCIAL I ABANDONED 15' ALLEY I I 15' CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER ORDINANCE 2013-3491 I I I � I LIBBY A GAAS COLLEGE HEIGHTS BLOCK B, LOT 4 ZONED D 1588/67 LOT 3 BLOCK 'B' NIMITZ PROPERTIES, LLC COLLEGE HEIGHTS BLOCK B. LOT 3 EXISTING ZONING D 11830/105 — T - — 20' P.U.E. I� 11191/107 I I 9' x 10.5' P.U.E. 11191/107 5' P.U.E. 11191/107 PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT 11191/107 I KALGROUP PROPERTIES, LP. COLLEGE HEIGHTS BLOCK B. LOT 1R ZONED GC 11191/107 UNIVERSITY DRIVE PAVEMENT WIDTH VARIES - R.O.W. VARIES 5' P.U.E. 11191/107 5' P.U.E.--4r" 11191/107 I I I PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT /I 11191/107 20 10 0 20 SCALE IN FEET PROJECT LOCATION LEGEND ZONE LINE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE ACCESS EASEMENTS UTILITY EASEMENTS VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave (* 40r*�4 College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas j4&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File #: 15-0484 Version: 1 Name: Eskimo Hut - Conditional Use Permit Type: Rezoning Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/21/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Conditional Use Permit for a Night Club/Bar/Tavern, more specifically the Eskimo Hut, consisting of approximately 2,475 square feet of the Woodstone Shopping Plaza being Park Place, Block 4, Lot 3, generally located at 919 Harvey Road, located on the east side of Woodstone Shopping Center which is generally located on the northwest corner of Harvey Road and Munson Avenue. Case #CUP2015-000002 (M. Thomas) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change.) Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Staff Report Application Site Plan Date Ver. Action By Action Result Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Conditional Use Permit for a Night Club/Bar/Tavern, more specifically the Eskimo Hut, consisting of approximately 2,475 square feet of the Woodstone Shopping Plaza being Park Place, Block 4, Lot 3, generally located at 919 Harvey Road, located on the east side of Woodstone Shopping Center which is generally located on the northwest corner of Harvey Road and Munson Avenue. Case #CUP2015-000002 (M. Thomas) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change.) College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M University® CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ESKIMO HUT CUP2016-000002 REQUEST: To convert an existing building into a bar use SCALE: Approximately 2,475 square feet of commercial space LOCATION: 919 Harvey Road, located on the east side of Woodstone Shopping Center which is generally located on the corner of Harvey Road and Munson Avenue. APPLICANT: Tyler Stephenson PROJECT MANAGER: Madison Thomas, Staff Planner mthomas@cstx.gov BACKGROUND: Previously, this tenant has been used as a restaurant. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 5 September 3, 2015 m� r U C7 ic A 9 0 0 U Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 5 September 3, 2015 NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 3, 2015 Advertised Council Hearing Date: September 21, 2015 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Cripple Creek Condominiums HOA— Cenury21 BVP Property Management Woodstock Condominiums — BCR Property Management Property owner notices mailed: Five Contacts in support: 0 Contacts in opposition: One Inquiry contacts: 0 ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Urban Mixed Use, R-4 Multi -Family Multi -Family Redevelopment Area South (across Harvey Urban Mixed Use, WPC Wolf Pen Creek, Multi -Family, Road) Redevelopment Area C-3 Light Commercial Commercial Retail East (across Munson Urban Mixed Use, R-6 High Density Multi- Multi -Family Avenue) Redevelopment Area Family West Urban Mixed Use, R-6 High Density Multi- Multi -Family Redevelopment Area Family DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1956 Zoning: R-3 Apartment Building District (upon annexation) C-1 General Commercial (1973) Renamed GC General Commercial (2012) Final Plat: Approximately 19.82 acres platted September 1978 Site development: General Commercial REVIEW CRITERIA 1. The proposed use shall meet the purpose and intent of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and meet all minimum standards for this type of use per the LIDO. The proposed use of a bar in the Woodstone Shopping Center requires a Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 5 September 3, 2015 Conditional Use Permit to allow for a Nightclub, Tavern or Bar Use. The applicant is proposing to turn approximately 2,475 square feet of commercial space in an existing building in the Woodstone Shopping Center into a use classified as a bar. The only change to the site plan that the applicant is proposing is the fencing of the outdoor patio space, the rest of the existing site will not change. This would create an additional 475 square feet, which have already been added to the total square feet of the use. Currently, there are no proposed changes to the building's exterior. 2. The proposed use shall be consistent with the development policies and goals and objectives as embodied in the Comprehensive Plan for development in the City. The subject tract is shown on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Urban Mixed Use which allows for residential, commercial, and office uses in vertical mixed-use structures. The subject property is also designated by the Comprehensive Plan as a Redevelopment Area. These areas are identified as anticipating a change in land use, and, if appropriate, character to help it evolve into a more dense area with mixed-use activity. 3. The proposed use shall not be detrimental to the health, welfare, or safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants, not be substantially or permanently injurious to neighboring property. The proposed use is required by the Unified Development Ordinance to be at least 300 feet away from any church, public school or public hospital. This use will meet this ordinance and will likely not be detrimental or substantially injurious to the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants. 4. The proposed site plan and circulation plan shall be harmonious with the character of the surrounding area. The applicant is not proposing major changes to the site plan that would cause the site to disrupt the current character of the surrounding area. The addition of the outdoor seating area is generally harmonious with the character of the surrounding area, as multiple other tenants offer outdoor seating areas. The building is an existing 2,000 square -foot space with a drive-through thus keeping the site plan and circulation plan harmonious with the surrounding area's character. 5. The proposed use shall not negatively impact existing uses in the area or in the City through impacts on public infrastructure such as roads, parking facilities, electrical, or water and sewer systems, or on public services such as police and fire protection, solid waste collection, or the ability of existing infrastructure and services to adequately provide services. This use will not negatively impact public infrastructure or services. This use will be in an existing site zoned GC General Commercial that was originally planned and developed to accommodate the commercial -related uses. This site has existing parking spaces that meet the requirements for the bar use. 6. The proposed use shall not negatively impact existing uses in the area or in the City. Existing uses in the area include commercial, multi -family and the Wolf Pen Creek District. The addition of this use will not negatively impact existing uses. Currently, the Woodstone shopping center has one other business that is designated as a bar use and another that sells alcohol. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 5 September 3, 2015 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Site Map Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 of 5 September 3, 2015 ('1I'I"Y OF C01 -LACE S`I"AFION Home of7exasA6Nl University` FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 4 CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: STAFF: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION GENERAL (Check all applicable) ❑ Commercial day care in R-4, R-6, or R-7 ❑ ❑ Drive-in/thru window in WPC ❑ ❑) Multifamily in WPC ❑ Night Club in P -MUD or C,1 (G0 ❑ ❑ Hotel in A -O or A -OR e �r4 .h O� ❑ RV Park in A -O or C-1 Retail Sales and Service - Alcohol in WPC Educational facility, outdoor instruction in A -OR Parking as a primary use in A -P Commercial Amusements in C-3 MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ® $1,165 Conditional Use Permit Fee. ❑ 32 Site Plan Application Fee (if applicable) --E-13§9-Residential Architectural Standard Building Review Application Fee (if applicable). 600 (minlm pplication / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). 0 Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ❑ Copy of site plan. NOTE: Proposed development in Wolf Pen Creek must be reviewed by the Design Review Board. When staff has completed their technical review of the proposal, it will be scheduled for consideration by the Design Review Board. Copy of all current design plans and color samples will be required for the Board. ❑ One (1) folded copy of the landscape plan (if applicable). ❑ One (1) copy of the following for Non -Residential Architectural Standards building review (if applicable): ❑ Building elevations to scale for all buildings. ❑ List of building materials for all facades and screening. ❑ Color samples or list of colors to be used from the approved color palette. ❑ Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report. ❑ Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable). ❑ Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request (if applicable). ❑ The attached Site Plan, Conceptual Site Plan, and Non -Residential Architectural Standards Building Review checklists with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off (as applicable). Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference tit, NAME OF PROJECT ADDRESS rE:` LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) 3, t., 3': t '§. _ T '� a �s ` . APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name b w# = E-mail �.. V. Street Address , city Phone Number Revised 5/15 State Zip Code Fax Number Page 1 of 12 Proposed use of property TA V Current zoning ofproperty Number ofparking spaces required Number ofparking spaces provided Total Acreage Floodplain Acreage Building square feet Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? 7yea �/No FOR MULTI -FAMILY |NWPC: Number -one bedroom units Total number of"two, bedroom units Number oftwo bedroobedrooms »132sq. ft. Number of two bedroom unite vvUh~bedroorna « 132 aq. ft. Total number of three bedroom units Total number of four bedroom units Total number of housing units PARKLAUD DEDICATION (residential development will require parkland dedication at the time of building permit) dwelling units (DL)X $ per unit = Number ofacres in fl000plain Number of acres in detenti Number of acres in greenways Date approved bythe Parks &Recreation sory Board Total Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 12 1�~ ' PRJFERTYOVVNER'S INFORMATION: --- Name -E-mail le City —State Zip Code d Phone Number q2 ->!Z4 Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Nome ^ u� Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number Present use ofpropertyAt Proposed use of property TA V Current zoning ofproperty Number ofparking spaces required Number ofparking spaces provided Total Acreage Floodplain Acreage Building square feet Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? 7yea �/No FOR MULTI -FAMILY |NWPC: Number -one bedroom units Total number of"two, bedroom units Number oftwo bedroobedrooms »132sq. ft. Number of two bedroom unite vvUh~bedroorna « 132 aq. ft. Total number of three bedroom units Total number of four bedroom units Total number of housing units PARKLAUD DEDICATION (residential development will require parkland dedication at the time of building permit) dwelling units (DL)X $ per unit = Number ofacres in fl000plain Number of acres in detenti Number of acres in greenways Date approved bythe Parks &Recreation sory Board Total Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 12 APP!LICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE WITHOUT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ADDRESSED: 1. Provide odetailed explanation ofthe proposed use including hours of operation, anticipated traffic, total building capacity, number of employees, number of students, number of children, ages of children, etc., as applicable. 2. Explain how the proposed conditional use will meet the purpose and intent of the Unified Development Ordinance and how the use will meet all of the nnin|rnunn standards established in the UDO for this type of use including parking, landscaping, and screening of offensive areas (trash, loading areas, transformers, utility connections, etc.). 3. Explain how the proposed use is consistent with Comprehensive Plan. 4.Explain how the proposed use iscompatible with the surrounding areas. 41, 5. Explain how the proposed site plan and circulation plan will be harmonious with the character of the surrounding �m ^ LU 3. Explain how the proposed use is consistent with Comprehensive Plan. 4.Explain how the proposed use iscompatible with the surrounding areas. 41, 5. Explain how the proposed site plan and circulation plan will be harmonious with the character of the surrounding 6. Explain how infrastructure impacts will be minimized, including traffic impacts. 7. Explain the effects of the use will have on the environment. Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 12 LU 6. Explain how infrastructure impacts will be minimized, including traffic impacts. 7. Explain the effects of the use will have on the environment. Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 12 IN ADDITION, FOR NIGHT CLUBS, BARS, OR TAVERNS: 0 8. Approximate the distance to the nearest residential area and indicate the housing type (single family, duplex, multi -family, etc.). 9. The College Station Codes limit noise levels to 65 d.b.a. from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. and to 55 d.b.a. from 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.. Estimate the noise levels produced from the proposed use as heard from all property lines. 10. Approximate the distance to the nearest church, school, or hospital. These measurements must be taken from front door, along property lines, to front door. 15, The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. t Signature and title Date k Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 12 '" A...E,, ' -reg t 9. The College Station Codes limit noise levels to 65 d.b.a. from 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. and to 55 d.b.a. from 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.. Estimate the noise levels produced from the proposed use as heard from all property lines. 10. Approximate the distance to the nearest church, school, or hospital. These measurements must be taken from front door, along property lines, to front door. 15, The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. t Signature and title Date k Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 12 JUN -4-2015 01:17P FROM:MARTELL VENTURES 828-251-1825 TO:19798461461 P.1 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1, No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herelh. 3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re -issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is Issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of Issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction Including NOI and SWPPP. 7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre - pour) and post construction. 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project, All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12. Release of plans to ! (name or firm) Is authorized for bidding purposes only, I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit, 13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE, Property Owner(s) Date Engineer Certification, N%A lf'b f kTv >. " V (tirti�'�'4 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first In the construction sequence. 2. 1 will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: I.e., projects over W acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines. All development has been designed In accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE, Engineer Date Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 12 EXIST. WINDOW TO REMAIN— EXIST. COUNTER HEIGHT OUTLET TO REMAIN EXIST. BOLLARDS TO REMAIL EXIST. WINDOW TO REMAIN— Im POINT OF SERVICE REGISTER FOR DRIVE-THRU EXIST. WALK-IN FREEZER PREP AREA 0 POINT OF SERVICE REGISTER SEATING AREA DEMO/EXISTING PLAN NEW PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=I'-0" SCALE: 1/4"=I'-0" u i■oaoE NEW WALK-IN COOLER NEW FENCE AND GATE- NEW FENCE AND GATE - NEW OUTDOOR PATIO SEATING AREA.(APPROX. 475 SF) REVISIONS DATE 06/05/15 Z Q DRAWN KB/RF V) OZ CHECKED NW V) Z Q (D Q w V) OZ W0 O O 0000 I L Q X W w Q ' ^� v I m W m O W w ro U~ol w Z z o. Q� O Z ZQ Q O Q Z JOB NO.: 1531 NAME: FLOOR PLANS SCALE: 1/4'. 71 -0" SHEET A] 00 Q Q w OZ �o O w Q Q w S � J Y W C) JOB NO.: 1531 NAME: FLOOR PLANS SCALE: 1/4'. 71 -0" SHEET A] 00 College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave (* 40r*�4 College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas j4&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File #: 15-0488 Version: 2 Name: Cityview Southwest Rezoning Type: Rezoning Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/24/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to SC Suburban Commercial for approximately 7.91 acres being situated in the Robert Stevenson Survey, Abstract No. 54, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being all of the 4.71 acre tract described in the deed from Eugene B. Savage, III, to Eugene B. Savage, III, Revocable Trust, to Jupiter & Space Property, LLC, recorded in Volume 9849, Page 220, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and all of the 3.19 acre tract described in the deed from Larry Ruffino, Trustee, to Jupiter & Space Property, LLC, recorded in Volume 9849, Page 214, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, generally located at 2970 Barron Road, generally located southwest of the intersection of William D. Fitch Pkwy and Barron Road. Case #REZ2015-000013 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change) Sponsors: Laura Walker Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Staff Report Application Rezoning Map Date Ver. Action By Action Result Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to SC Suburban Commercial for approximately 7.91 acres being situated in the Robert Stevenson Survey, Abstract No. 54, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being all of the 4.71 acre tract described in the deed from Eugene B. Savage, III, to Eugene B. Savage, III, Revocable Trust, to Jupiter & Space Property, LLC, recorded in Volume 9849, Page 220, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and all of the 3.19 acre tract described in the deed from Larry Ruffino, Trustee, to Jupiter & Space Property, LLC, recorded in Volume 9849, Page 214, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, generally located at 2970 Barron Road, generally located southwest of the intersection of William D. Fitch Pkwy and Barron Road. Case #REZ2015-000013 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change) College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM (*400r� CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M University® REZONING REQUEST for Cityview Southwest REZ2015-000013 REQUEST: R Rural to SC Suburban Commercial. SCALE: 7.91 acres LOCATION: 2970 Barron Road, being generally located southwest of the intersection of William D. Fitch Pkwy and Barron Road, and being situated in the Robert Stevenson Survey, Abstract No. 54, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being all of the 4.71 acre tract described in the deed from Eugene B. Savage, III, to Eugene B. Savage, III, Revocable Trust, to Jupiter & Space Property, LLC, recorded in Volume 9849, Page 220, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and all of the 3.19 acre tract described in the deed from Larry Ruffino, Trustee, to Jupiter & Space Property, LLC, recorded in Volume 9849, Page 214, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas APPLICANT: Paul Murphy PROJECT MANAGER: Laura Walker, Staff Planner (walker@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 6 September 3, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 6 September 3, 2015 7✓ v Z «�, Oct c� C-') A O I / lip r / u> NaN e -- Planning & Zoning Commission September 3, 2015 Z, p U 1 1 1 p dpi Z Z Z O R' Y C m ¢ LL n I -- Page Page 3 of 6 NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 3, 2015 Advertised Council Hearing Date: September 21, 2015 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Property owner notices mailed: Contacts in support: Contacts in opposition Inquiry contacts: ADJACENT LAND USES 27 None at the time of staff report. None at the time of staff report. One at the time of staff report. Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use Northeast Suburban Commercial R Rural (Across william D. General Suburban GS General Suburban Single-family homes Fitch P Southeast Suburban Commercial C-3 Light Commercial Single-family home Across Barron Rd Southwest Estate R Rural Single-family estate homes Northwest (Across Jeanne General Suburban GS General Suburban Single-family homes Drive Annexation: 1995 Zoning: Properties zoned A -O Agricultural Open upon annexation. 2013: A -O Agricultural -Open district was renamed to R Rural. Final Plat: Unplatted Site development: Property is currently vacant. PROPOSAL The applicant has requested an SC Suburban Commercial District for the development of commercial and office uses. The properties are currently undeveloped but proposed to be consolidated for development. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Suburban Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan states that this designation is for small concentrations of commercial activities adjacent to major roads that cater primarily to nearby residents versus the larger community or region. The proposed zoning permits lower -density commercial uses that Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 6 September 3, 2015 provide services to nearby neighborhoods along William D. Fitch Pkwy and Barron Road, allowing the property to be developed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The subject area is immediately bordered by William D Fitch Pkwy to the northeast with adjacent single-family uses, and the single-family Southern Trace Subdivision to the northwest. It is bordered by Barron Road to the southeast with a large single-family lot across Barron currently zoned as C-3 Light Commercial, and the abutting properties to the southwest are large lot single-family homes. The proposed SC Suburban Commercial zoning for commercial and office uses is compatible with all these nearby uses, and SC standards will also require compatibility with single-family uses through the use of architectural standards, buffers, etc. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The subject area has direct access to William D Fitch Pkwy and Barron Road and is surrounded by single- family neighborhoods, making this location suitable for suburban commercial uses. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The subject area is currently zoned R Rural and is undeveloped. With this zoning, the subject area is limited to 2+ acre single-family and agricultural uses, which is less suitable given the existing development pattern along William D. Fitch and the surrounding area. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The subject property is marketable with its current zoning of R Rural, but the development of the majority of properties around it and its proximity to a freeway/expressway and minor arterial makes the rezoning of this property to a commercial use more desirable. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water service will be provided by the City of College Station via existing 18 -inch water main located along Barron Road and 8 -inch water main located along Jeanne Drive. The majority portion of the tracts is in the Spring Creek sanitary sewer impact fee area. The site does not have direct access to a sewer line. The developer will need to extend sanitary sewer from Barron Cut Off Road in order to have sanitary sewer service. The subject property is located in the Spring Creek Drainage Basin. The natural conveyance path drains towards Barron Road. Detention will be required with the development. The subject property has frontage on Barron Road, a four -lane minor arterial, and William D. Fitch Parkway, a freeway. Drainage and other public infrastructures required with the site shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. Existing infrastructures appear to currently have capacity to adequately serve the proposed use. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 6 September 3, 2015 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Rezoning Map Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 of 6 September 3, 2015 (*00`0� CITE' OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&,A1 University' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: STAFF: AMENDMENTZONING MAP APPLICATION GENERAL MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: rX_1 $1,165 Rezoning Application Fee. Ox Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. [_X] Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request. Fx� One (1 ) copy of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. Fx� Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). Fx� A CAD (dxfldwg) - model space State Plane NAD 83 or GIS (Shp) digital file (e-mailed to pdsdioitalsubmittal cstx_g_ov_) NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference 1-21-15 NAME OF PROJECT Cityview Southwest ADDRESS N/A LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Robert Stevenson Survey, A-54 GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY, IF NOT PLATTED: West corner of the intersection of Barron Road and and Wm. D. Fitch arkway TOTAL ACREAGE 7.91 acres APPLICANTIPROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Paul Murphy E-mail paula@themurphylegalgroup.com Street Address 12633 State Highway 30 City College Station Phone Number 979-694-4844 Name Anthony Dyson Street Address 1 Lori Lane City College Station Phone NurnVer--qZq--6-9Q-MQ State TX Fax Number 979-690-4808 E-mail Paul@themurphylegalgroup.com State 7X 10116 Page 1 of 3 OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.): Name Joe Schultz, P.E. E-mail joe@schultzengineetingllc.com Street Address 2730 Longmire, Suite City College Station Phone Number 979-764.3900 State TX Zip Code Fax Number 979-764-3910 This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated June 8, 2015 of the Brazos County Official Records. Existing Zoning R, Rural Present Use of Property Vacant Proposed Use of Property Commercial and Office and recorded in Volume 12743, Page 91 Proposed Zoning SC, Suburban Commercial REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The surrounding area has developed primarily as single family residential and this growth is generating a need for neighborhood commercial businesses and services and also a demand for office space in this area. 2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. This zoning change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan 3. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The zoning and uses of nearby properties adjacent to this tract is single family residential and this zone change will be compatible as the Suburban Commercial zoning district requirements are for developments that are adjacent to residential developments with the intent to provide services needed by the nearby residents. 10/10 Page 2 of 3 4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The property is at the intersection of a freeway and a minor arterial street so adequate access is available for this type of development and the number of single family homes with a few miles of this development indicates there is an adequate population to support this development b. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted, by the current zoning district. The current zoning would allow only several large residential lots which is not suitable for this location. & _ Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Single family lots at this location is not marketable to the cost of the land. 7. list any other reasons to support this zone change. Improvements are under construction for Barron Road. These improvements do not have a negative effect on the proposed development. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney, If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf �LL,a� -IP-0 Signature and title Cate 10110 v I,rlrtt CSr Page 3 of 3 LOT 24 1 LOT 251 LOT 26 McLAREN DRIVE G LOT 1 LL SOUTHERN TRACE SUBDIVISION PHASE 2 F ZONED GS - GENERAL SUBURBAN LOT 2 w z LOT 3 a 0 0 U K 0 LOT 4 w z z a w LOT 5 LOT 6 20' WADE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT VOL. 7906, PG. 209 STATE HIGHWAY No. 40 — WILLIAM D FITCH PARKWAY R.O.W. VARIES RODNEY WILLIAM BOVEY CALLED 5.00 ACRES EXHIBIT -A- VOL. 3601, PG. 317 ZONED R -RURAL 3.19 ACRE TRACT EXISTING ZONING R -RURAL PROPOSED ZONING SC -SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL 4.71 ACRE TRACT EXISTING ZONING R -RURAL PROPOSED ZONING SC -SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL 2.16 ACRES R STEVENSON TRACT 7.2 VOL 1577, PG 136 ZONED SC - SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL W.S. PHILLIPS PARKWAY / I I UNE Tffla UNE U NM DlIWc VOL. 10' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY I I LI 9920 545 3Y 4 70-E E SEMENT 2016 , PG. 61 L4 99.0' NM' 59' 41.71'1 / 16' WIDE PUBLIC UTIUTI' EASEMENT VOL. 2016 , PG. 61 / I LOT 1 / I I 2.528 ACRES WESTMINSTER SUBDIVISION / I I PHASE ONE VOL 2315, PG 51 LOT 7 2.879 ACRES ZONED R -RURAL WESTMINSTER SUBDIVISION / PHASE ONE VOL. 2016, PG. 61 / ZONED R -RURAL I I / I I / I I / I I / I 50 25 0 50 / I SCALE IN FEET VICINITY MAP It ii II II — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 30' 'WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT VOL. 5760, PG. 293 I I I I I I I I I ^` I d I I I 20' WIDE CITY OF BRYA ELECTRICAL EASEMENT VOL. 802, PG. 423 I I O 3 [if O z O_ O O O I I DO 2.16 ACRES R STEVENSON TRACT 7.2 VOL 1577, PG 136 ZONED SC - SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL W.S. PHILLIPS PARKWAY / I I UNE Tffla UNE U NM DlIWc VOL. 10' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY I I LI 9920 545 3Y 4 70-E E SEMENT 2016 , PG. 61 L4 99.0' NM' 59' 41.71'1 / 16' WIDE PUBLIC UTIUTI' EASEMENT VOL. 2016 , PG. 61 / I LOT 1 / I I 2.528 ACRES WESTMINSTER SUBDIVISION / I I PHASE ONE VOL 2315, PG 51 LOT 7 2.879 ACRES ZONED R -RURAL WESTMINSTER SUBDIVISION / PHASE ONE VOL. 2016, PG. 61 / ZONED R -RURAL I I / I I / I I / I I / I 50 25 0 50 / I SCALE IN FEET VICINITY MAP It College Station, TX City Hall 1101 Texas Ave (* 40r*�4 College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas j4&M University® Legislation Details (With Text) File #: 15-0492 Version: 1 Name: Northpoint Crossing Rezoning Type: Rezoning Status: Agenda Ready File created: 8/24/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular On agenda: 9/3/2015 Final action: Title: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District in order to revise the commercial component of a mixed-use development for approximately 11 acres being Lot 1A, 2A and 3, Block 1 of Northpoint Crossing Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, generally located at the northwest intersection of University Drive and Texas Avenue. Case #REZ2015-000011 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change) Sponsors: Jessica Bullock Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Staff Report Application Rezoning Map Proposed Concept Plan Date Ver. Action By Action Result Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District in order to revise the commercial component of a mixed-use development for approximately 11 acres being Lot 1 A, 2A and 3, Block 1 of Northpoint Crossing Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, generally located at the northwest intersection of University Drive and Texas Avenue. Case #REZ2015-000011 (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 21, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change) College Station, TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/28/2015 powered by LegistarTM (*Orq" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M University® REZONING REQUEST FOR Northpoint Crossing REZ2016-000011 REQUEST: PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District in order to revise the commercial component of a mixed-use development SCALE: Approximately 11 acres LOCATION: 410 Texas Avenue, generally located at the northeast intersection of University Drive and Texas Avenue APPLICANT: Mitchell & Morgan, LLP PROJECT MANAGER: Jessica Bullock, Staff Planner jbullock@cstx.gov PROJECT OVERVEW: The purpose of this request is to modify the Concept Plan of the existing PDD. The existing PDD Concept Plan shows a "mixed use" area with first floor commercial and multi -family above. The proposed Concept Plan allows first floor residential in the "mixed use" area, so long as at least 50% is maintained for commercial uses. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning and associated Concept Plan. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 10 September 3, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 10 September 3, 2015 / S49 d xe e�e' 4a�Ruj P, r `i O� ma E> = 0- 00 a O m > m N ya`s We❑� a W EN VA `W a x m 0 a c U—�TmW M ❑ iy�NJ❑J EL Q l l l l! 2 mzUM2omd A a a EW n K T v aE to E � U m O @ 4� w w06c)A m m w � cN9 tt ❑ r Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 10 September 3, 2015 NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date Advertised Council Hearing Dates: September 3, 2015 September 21, 2015 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Property owner notices mailed: 18 Contacts in support: None Contacts in opposition: None Inquiry contacts: One ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Zoning Land Use Northwest Texas A&M University CU College and University Vacant Urban GC General Commercial Northeast & Redevelopment Cl Commercial Industrial Hotels, Restaurant PDD Planned Development District Southeast Texas A&M Texas A&M polo (across University University CU College and University field Drive) Texas A&M Future Century Southwest University CU College and University Square Development DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1939 Zoning: GC General Commercial, Cl Commercial -Industrial, R-4 Multi - Family, and D Duplex rezoned PDD Planned Development District in March and May 2012. Revision to PDD Planned Development District (2014) Final Plat: Northpoint Crossing Subdivision Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 (2013), Northpoint Crossing Subdivision Lot 3, Block 1 (2014) Site development: Northpoint Crossing Mixed Use Development Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 10 September 3, 2015 REVIEW CRITERIA Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as Urban and part of Redevelopment Area II on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The intersection of Texas Avenue and University Drive has also been identified as a Primary Arrival Gateway into the City. The Comprehensive Plan describes Urban as: This land use designation is generally for areas that should have a very intense level of development activities. These areas will tend to consist of townhomes, duplexes, and high-density apartments. General commercial and office uses, business parks, and vertical mixed-use may also be permitted within growth and redevelopment areas. Redevelopment Area II: Texas Avenue, University Drive, and Harvey Road is described by the Comprehensive Plan as: This area includes a number of underperforming land uses that, due to their proximity to two of the busiest corridors in the City, are poised for redevelopment. Much of the area is currently subdivided into small lots, making it difficult to assemble land for redevelopment .... The proximity of existing neighborhoods and the Texas A&M University campus requires careful site planning and appropriate building design. These efforts should be complimentary to the Area V: Hospitality corridor plan, the neighborhood plan for the Eastgate area, and the Texas A&M University Campus Master Plan and should focus on bringing vertical mixed use and other aspects of urban character to this portion of the City. The existing PDD zoning with associated Concept Plan is consistent with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan to redevelop and consolidate underperforming properties in this area of the City. It provides vertical mixed use, high density multi -family, and pedestrian oriented development at the corner of Texas Avenue and University Drive in proximity to the Texas A&M University campus. This request, revising the amount of commercial, allowing for more multi -family, in the Concept Plan is still consistent with the Comprehensive Plan though there is concern for the diminishing amount of commercial potential at this intersection. Given the location and orientation of the "mixed use" area within the Concept Plan, at the major intersection, staff believes the best long term use on the first floor is still commercial. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The existing zoning and conforming uses of nearby property are consistent with this request to revise the PDD. The scale of the proposed uses, are developed at a higher intensity than the nearby existing hotel, fourplex, and restaurant uses. The Century Square development to the southwest of this property, is currently under construction and is anticipated to provide a mix of uses as it develops. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The revised PDD Planned Development District allows first floor multi -family units in the "mixed use" area of the existing Concept Plan. This is suitable for the property based on its proximity to the Texas A&M University campus. As described later, this development has completed transportation improvements and mitigation efforts and utility upgrades to provide adequate services to the development. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 10 September 3, 2015 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property is currently zoned PDD Planned Development District. This request revises the "mixed use" area of the existing Concept Plan, allowing first floor multi -family so long as at least 50 percent of the structures designated for "mixed use" is retained for general commercial uses. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property should be considered marketable with the current zoning. The applicant requests a revision to the commercial component of the development stating that despite efforts, current market conditions are slow. In the long term with improved market conditions and additional mixed use development in the immediate area, this area may be marketable again for additional commercial. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: This site is served by 12 -inch waterlines along Texas Avenue, University Drive, and the public way. There are 8- and 12 -inch sanitary sewer gravity mains along the public way tying into the existing Hensel Park Lift Station. The lift station pumps sanitary sewer flow to the 'Northeast Trunkline' via a 12 - inch force main which conveys the flow to the Carters Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. Drainage is generally to the south and west within the Wolf Pen Creek and Burton Creek Drainage Basins, respectively. As part of the previous rezoning application, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was submitted. To maintain the traffic level of service in this area, the following mitigation strategies have been completed: • An additional left turn bay will be added to University Drive eastbound to northbound Texas Avenue, creating a dual left configuration by modifying the existing raised median. • An additional right turn lane will be provided on southbound Texas Avenue to westbound University Drive. • On University Drive, a right turn deceleration lane for the proposed driveway will be built. The raised median on Texas Avenue will also be extended north beyond the proposed driveway location. • The former Meadowland Street intersection at University Drive has been closed and the existing median break in University Drive will be closed as well. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 of 10 September 3, 2015 SUMMARY OF EXISTING PDD AND CONCEPT PLAN (The change with this request is shown in bold) The existing rezoning and associated Concept Plan propose a vertical mixed use and multi- family redevelopment at the intersection of Texas Avenue and University Drive. Currently the vertical "mixed use' area consists ground floor general commercial uses with multi -family units above. This request revises the "mixed use' area of the Concept Plan, allowing multi- family units to be permitted on the first floor, provided that at least 50% have general commercial uses. The multi -family area consists of multi -story buildings oriented along the side and rear of the development along the former Meadowland Street. Building heights are roughly five stories with parking garages being up to seven or eight stories. The existing PDD Concept Plan illustrates one large, five -story building on a podium with parking underneath along Hensel Street. Parking is provided in three parking garages with some surface parking in the retail area and for the units along Hensel Street. The development will use the dimensional standards of the GC General Commercial zoning district for the commercial uses and R-6 High Density Multi -Family zoning district for the residential uses. Meritorious Modifications The following modifications have been approved with past PDD requests in 2012 and 2014. This request does not revise or add any modifications. 1. Zoning District Standards — LIDO Section 12-5.2 "Residential Dimensional Standards" and Section 12-5.4 "Non -Residential Dimensional Standards": An increase to the maximum residential unit density from 30 units per acre to 60 units per acre is proposed. While this increase in density can be supported, it is necessary to ensure that adequate infrastructure and transportation facilities including vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian are provided for the development and surrounding area. The applicant requests to reduce minimum building setbacks for the GC General Commercial and R-6 High Density Multi -Family based zoning districts to 5 feet along all property lines with the understanding that sufficient easements for utilities will be provided. The standard building setbacks for these districts are 25 -foot front setback, 7.5 -foot side setback, 15 -foot side street setback, and 15 -foot rear setback for the GC district and 20 -foot rear setback for R-6. 2. Use — LIDO Section 12-6.3.0 "Use Table": The P -MUD Planned Mixed Use District is the base district for uses for the development with Health Care, Medical Clinic being added as a permitted use and Conference/Convention Center, Country Club, Duplex, Fraternal Lodge, Fuel Sales, Golf Course/Driving Range, Parking as a Primary Use, Sexual Oriented Businesses, Single -Family Detached, and Shooting Range (Indoor) uses removed from the permitted list. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 7 of 10 September 3, 2015 3. Parking — LIDO Section 12-7.3 "Off -Street Parking Standards": The applicant proposes the standard shopping center ratio of 1 parking space per every 250 gross square feet of commercial use (1:250), though not required to provide additional parking if more than 25% of these areas are utilized as intense commercial uses. The applicant proposes the minimum residential parking requirement be reduced to one parking space per bedroom. The current ordinance requires one space per bedroom for three and four bedroom units though some additional parking is provided with one and two bedroom units (1.5 spaces/ bedroom). Parking spaces in the garage may be compact parking spaces. Also, parking along Hensel Street does not require interior or double landscape islands in the row. 4. Transportation — LIDO Section 12-7.4 "Access Management and Circulation", Section 12- 8.3.G "Blocks", and Section 12-11.2 "Defined Terms"- Public Way: The applicant proposes some modifications to transportation related requirements: • Three driveways existed along Texas Avenue and six driveways along University Drive, including the former Meadowland Street. The Concept Plan consolidated these to one driveway on Texas Avenue and one driveway on University Drive, though they still do not meet minimum spacing standards. The applicant requests the spacing be acceptable and the concept has been agreed by TxDOT. • The maximum block length in Urban designated areas is 660 feet with a maximum block perimeter of 2,000 feet. Based on these dimensions, two street or public way projections are required along the Public Way Section C -C toward the Texas A&M System property to the southwest. One public way stub is provided with Hensel Street also stubbed to the Texas A&M System property. It is anticipated that the Texas A&M System property will redevelop with commercial, retail, residential uses but it is not known how these connections will be incorporated into their development. • Public Ways are defined with certain dimensional and design criteria. The applicant requests to reduce the maximum curve radius from a 200 -foot radius to a 45 -foot radius, allow sidewalks to be back of curb instead of three feet off and have sidewalk widths as shown in the attached public way cross sections. 5. Signs — LIDO Section 12-7.4 "Signs": Instead of using standard commercial or multi -family signage as the basis, the applicant proposes to utilize the signage permitted in Wolf Pen Creek (LIDO Section 12-5.8.A.11 Signs) with the following modifications: • Signs may be approved administratively by staff with appeals to staff's interpretations being able to considered by the Design Review Board; • Wayfinding signage (LIDO Section 12-7.5.AA Campus Wayfinding Signs) is permitted for this development and may also be located at street intersections with public ways and along public ways with parallel parking; • Hanging signage (LIDO Section 12-5.8.B.12.c.3) is permitted with a minimum clearance of three inches from the building and edge of canopy; • Low profile freestanding signs do not have a setback requirement and may be allowed within 150 feet of each other at the interior intersection; • Light pole signage may be utilized and is limited to 21 square feet per light pole. These signs are not in lieu of freestanding signage, are intended as development identification and special event signage, will not be utilized for tenant signage, and do not count against attached signage limitations; Planning & Zoning Commission Page 8 of 10 September 3, 2015 • Attached signage used as development identification signage at the corner of Texas Avenue and University Drive may extend up to two feet from any exterior building face, mansard, awning, or canopy; and • Projections signs may be used for identification signage for the general area and not count against the attached signage square feet unless they contain copy of the individual business. Projection signs may be oriented toward the public rights-of-way or public ways and one permitted per tenant per public way frontage. 6. Landscaping — UDO Section 12-7.6 "Landscaping and Tree Protection": With the one exception as stated below, the applicant proposes to utilize the Northgate standards contained in LIDO Section 12-5.8.6.9 "Landscape and Streetscape Standards" with the following modifications: The Hensel Street portion of the development shall meet the standard requirements of LIDO Section 12-7.6 Landscaping and Tree Protection; • The street trees along Texas Avenue and University Drive may be placed outside of TxDOT right-of-way. Street trees along Public Way Sections A -A and B -B shall be 50 feet on center with alternating planting areas spaced at 50 feet on center consisting of non -canopy trees, hedges or seasonal plantings. The Public Way Section C -C will have planting areas of 25 feet on center consisting of non -canopy trees, hedges, or seasonal plantings; • Building and Site Lighting shall still comply with UDO Section 12-7.11 Outdoor Lighting Standards; • The Street Lights section is not applicable as lights are owned and maintained by property owner. Architecture — UDO Section 12-7.10 "Non -Residential Architecture Standards": Instead of using this Section as the basis for architecture standards, the applicant proposes to utilize the Northgate standards contained in LIDO Section 12-5.8.6.4 "Building Design Standards." All subsections (Building Orientation and Access, Building Transparency, Architectural Relief, Roof Type, Exterior Building Material, Exterior Building Colors, and Canopies/ Awnings) shall apply to all non-residential and residential buildings. 8. Infrastructure — Section 12-3.4.A "Applicability": Most of the property is platted though some areas are tracts of land. The applicant has requested that building permits may be issued on these tracts prior to the platting of these areas with the provision that a temporary blanket easement be placed on the property and the property platted/replatted once all utilities are constructed and relocated and before Certificates of Occupancy are issued for the buildings. Community Benefits and Additional Enhancements The following community benefits, additional enhancements and/or improvements were proposed with past requests. Implementation of the Comprehensive Plan through redevelopment of an under -performing, blighted area that is designated as a Primary Arrival Gateway and described by the Comprehensive Plan as an area that should "focus on bringing vertical mixed-use and other aspects of urban development to this portion of the City." All existing buildings will be demolished before building permits will be issued for any new construction. The Northgate Building Design Standards (U DO Section 12-5.8.8.4) apply to all buildings, residential and non-residential. Currently there are no architectural requirements for residential buildings outside of the Northgate District. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 9 of 10 September 3, 2015 3. The Northgate Bicycle Parking Standards (U DO Section 12-5.8.8.7) apply to the development except that the design of the bicycle rack design is determined by the owner and approved by the City and bicycle parking may be located within the parking garage areas. Currently there are not bicycle parking (bike rack) requirements for residential developments outside of the Northgate District. 4. Installation of a bus stop shelter as approved by the City internal to the site to promote transit usage and another along University Drive to utilize District bus service. Bus stops or bus shelters are not required by standard ordinance. 5. The Northgate Dumpster and Mechanical Equipment Standards (UDO Section 12-5.8.8.10) shall apply with the exception that vegetation may also be used as a screening tool. 6. The Northgate Outside Storage and Display Standards (UDO Section 12-5.8.8.13) shall apply to the development. 7. The parking garage on Texas Avenue is wrapped with general commercial use on ground floor and residential above and the other parking garages along the former Meadowland Street are wrapped with multi -family uses. 8. An eight -foot bicycle and pedestrian route is proposed along the majority of the southwest property line to connect multi -family buildings and two parking garages to University Drive to allow easier bicycle and pedestrian movements from the development toward the Texas A&M University campus. 9. Mitigation for the Texas Avenue and University Drive intersection is proposed through a variety of transportation improvements including the intersection and median break for the former Meadowland Street being closed, a dual left turn lane on University Drive eastbound to Texas Avenue northbound and queue length extended, a dual right turn lane on Texas Avenue southbound to University Drive westbound, multiple driveways consolidated into one driveway on Texas Avenue and one driveway on University Drive, the median on Texas Avenue will be extended north past the proposed Public Way driveway, and a deceleration lane will be added to the proposed Public Way driveway on University Drive. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning and associated Concept Plan. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Rezoning Map 3. Proposed Concept Plan Planning & Zoning Commission Page 10 of 10 September 3, 2015 OFF" CITY OF Cour. Gi; STATION Nome ofTeX&A&M Univenity' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: _. DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: STAFF: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION PLANNED DISTRICTS one) ❑ ($1,165) Planned Development District (PDD) ❑ ($1,165) Planned Mixed -Used Development (P -MUD) Q ($315) Modification to Existing PDD or P -MUD Amendment - Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council Review Please use Concept Plan M/norAmendmentApplication forminoramendments as per Section 3.4.J of the UDO. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ❑X $315 -1,165 Rezoning Application Fee. ❑X Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional Information Is provided. ❑X Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA Is not necessary for the proposed request. (Air-eAliy (Jrbu UZ4 G1r-W-5 pr�H) ❑x One (1) copy of a fully dimensioned Rezoning Map on 24'x36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Presentzoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. ❑x Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). (Ptly- provjdc!d 4por4uspYg1eGM) A CAD (dxf/dwg) - model pace State Plane NAD 83 o GI (shp) digital file (e -malted to pdsdigitalsubmittal@cstx aov). One (1) copy of the Concept Plan on 24'x36" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the LIDO. ❑X One (1) copy of the Concept Plan on 8.5x11" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO. ❑X The attached Concept Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off. NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference December 21, 2011 NAME OF PROJECT Northpoint Crossing ADDRESS 410 Texas Ave South, College Station LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Lot 1A, 2A and 3, Block 1 Northpoint Crossing Subdivision GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY IF NOT PLATTED: Northwest comer of Texas Ave & University Drive TOTAL ACREAGE 11.19 acres Revised 5115 Page 1 of 7 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Mitchell & Morgan, LLP C/O Veronica Morgan, PE E-mail v@mltchellandmorgan.com Street Address 3204 Earl Rudder Freeway South City College Station Phone Number 979-260-6963 State Texas PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name Woodridge College Station 1, LLC c% Rick Arambulo Street Address 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2850 City Los Angeles Phone Number 310-824-2200 Fax Number Zip Code 77845 979-260-3564 E-mail rick@woodridgecapital.com State Califomia Zip Code 90067 Fax Number 310-824-7931 OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.): Name Amanda Wallis E-mail Awallis@Capstone-dev.com Street Address 431 Office Park Drive City Birmingham Phone Number 205-949-3849 State Alabama Fax Number Zip Code 35223 205-949-2070 This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated July 07,2011 and recorded in Volume_, Page_ of the Brazos County Official Records. Existing Zoning PDD Proposed Zoning PDD Present Use of Property Multi -Family and Retail Proposed Use of Property Multi -Family and Retail Proposed Use(s) of Property for PDD, If applicable: P -MUD uses w/o the following: Conferance/Convention Center, Country Club, Fraternal Lodge, Fuel Sales, Golf Course or Driving Range, Parking as Primary Use, SOB, Shooting Range, Utility P -MUD uses are prescribed in Section 6.2.C. Use Table of the Unified Development Ordinance. If P -MUD: Approximate percentage of residential land uses: N/A Approximate percentage of non-residential land uses: N/A REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. h there is sufficient traffic counts at this intersection for General Commercial use we would like to have the y to accommodate market conditions. This change in PDD is simply to give options for development of a of the 1st floors of Buildings 1, 2 and 3 so that they do not remain vacant. We are asking that the areas sly designated for commercial be flexible, with a commitment to keep at least 50% of this area as General rmialuse. Revlsed 5/15 Page 2 of 7 2. Indicate whether or not this zone change Is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If It is not, explain why the Plan Is Incorrect. this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. 3• How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? This modification to the existing PDD zoning will fit with the character of the remaining development and surround/no areas. 4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The Comprehensive Plan recognized this property as suitable to the higher densities and mixed use given its location in the community. 5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. This existing zoning district is PDD and this is a minor modification to that existing district. 6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. property has been listed with a national retail broker for more than 2 years. There has been significant contact national commercial entities but the current market conditions are slow. 7. List any other reasons to support this zone change. is important to assure that this property is fully leased given its high visibility at this majorintersection of College Revised 5115 Page 3 of 7 8. State the purpose and intent of the proposed development. 9 purpose and Intent is the same as the original development. CONCEPT PLAN SUPPORTING INFORMATION What is the range of future building heights? 5 stories - garage 7 stories Provide a general statement regarding the proposed drainage. N/A 3. List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought. attached letter. 4. If variations are sought, please provide a list of community benefits and/or innovative design concepts to justify the attached letter. Revised 5115 Page 4 of 7 S. Explain how the concept plan proposal will constitute and environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area. 1.1 stated in our earlier PDD rezoning, the Concept Plan shows redevelopment with a strong mix of uses in a TND ting. The walkability of the development and the mix of uses will allow for easy interaction with each other iout the use of vehicles. now me proposal is in comormay wim me poncies, goals, ano optecaves or me comprenenswe man. Comprehensive Plan illustrates this site as Urban Mixed Use development The desire in that category is to ide 'areas that should have the most intense development activities. These areas will tend to consist rsively of residential, commercial, and office uses in vertical mixed use structure. " This development will fulfill v goals and objectives as stated in the Comprehensive Plan. 7, Explain how the concept plan proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adiacent development. I change with this PDD zoning will not affect the existing or permitted uses on abutting sites because the site is being developed as mixed use. The only request is to alter the % of mix in the uses. ae1C:11%Tr, portions of the development that do not have access to a public street will have access to a public way. g. State how the development has provided adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to: parks, schools, and other public facilities. Public improvements that are necessary to provide service to this project have been designed and constructed. The project itself has several 'gathering spaces" and amenity areas to support the pedestrians, customers and tenants of the project. Revised 5/15 Page 5 of 7 10. Explain how the concept plan proposal will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially ilunous to properties or improvements in the 7t Plan and project has already benefitted the overall area by removing existing structures that were to the public health, safety and welfare. The overall design is such that it complements the adjacent 11. Explain how the concept plan proposal will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonable anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. TIA was written for this PDD and improvements per that report have been implemented to provide safe and nvenlent vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian circulation. This modification to the existing PDD does not change the nclusions of that TIA because the traffic generation from commercial is higher than that from residential units, so anginq some of the commercial to residential would lower traffic counts. Please note that a "complete site plan" must be submitted to Planning & Development Services for a formal review after the "concept plan" has been approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit - except for single- family development. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign thq,�ryl�ation or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of aujh riff ty for e company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. Woodridge College Station,LLC ' a Delaware limited Habil company July 7, 2015 Date Authorized Signatory Revised 6115 Page 6 of 7 M�IT�CH��E��LL IY�►1/1 MORGAN Jason Schubert, AICP July 15, 2015 Principal Planner City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77840 RE: NORTHPOINT CROSSING REZONING (REZ=PDD) - REVISED Dear Jason, As you are aware, we would like to modify our approved Concept Plan for Northpoint Crossing. The modification consists of altering the amount of general commercial on the ground floor of the buildings shown as mixed-use. Similar to the original rezoning of this property to PDD we are requesting the following bulk variances: We understand that we must choose a base zoning district for the residential and retail development upon which we base all variance requests, we have chosen the P -MUD district for all use restrictions and GC, General Commercial and R-6, High -Density Multi -Family for all dimensional criteria. Bulk Variance Requests: 1. Allow for reduced required parking at commercial locations within this development to create a more pedestrian friendly environment. 2. Allow for reduced setbacks on all sides to 5 feet. 3. Allow for block length variances along Texas A&M University property line. 4. Allow for driveway spacing variances to allow drive locations as shown on the Concept Plan. These drive locations have been discussed with TxDOT and they are agreeable to their locations with the deceleration lane on University Drive and the extension of the raised median in Texas Avenue to force the Texas Avenue driveway to operate as right-in/right-out. 5. We would request that we be allowed to construct all uses within the P -MUD district with the exception of the following: a. Conference/Convention Center b. Country Club c. Fraternal Lodge d. Fuel Sales e. Golf Course/Driving Range 1 3204 EARL RUDDER FWY. S. • COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 • T 979.260.6963 • F 979.260.3564 CIVIL ENGINEERING • HYDRAULICS - HYDROLOGY UTILITIES STREETS SITE PLANS SUBDIVISIONS info®mitchellandmorgan.mm • wwwmilchellandmorgan corn f. Parking as a Primary Use g. Sexually Oriented Business h. Shooting Range, Indoor i. Single Family Detached j. Duplexes And the addition of the following: k. Medical Clinics 6. Allow for a reduction in right-of-way acquisition on Texas Avenue from 12.5 feet to 7.5 feet. 7. Allow for a reduction in parking requirements for the residential component based upon 1 parking space per bed. 8. Allow for an increase in density on the property to a maximum of 60 units/acre. 9. Allow for reduction in geometric standards for a public way. 10. Allow for flexibility in sidewalk locations on the public way. 11. Allow for flexibility in easement widths for any infrastructure that is not publicly maintained (i.e. public ways and sidewalks) 12. Allow for compact spaces to be utilized within the development. 13. Allow for a reduction in landscape points if necessary due to the redevelopment limitations and expanse of hardscape being utilized. All landscaping along the Hensel Street portion of the development will be designed to meet standard streetscape and parking screening requiremetns while the remainder of the development will be designed to meet the NG -1 standards as modified in the current PDD. 14. Reduction in side setbacks between buildings to be a minimum as established by fire code. 15. Allow for reduction in easement separation distances from structures. 16. Allow for a public way to be utilized in place of a Thoroughfare on the Thoroughfare Plan. 17. Allow for flexibility in meeting NRA standards for all commercial store fronts. 18. Allow for wayfinding signage throughout the development, including at the Hensel Street and Meadowland intersection and at street intersections with public ways and along public ways with parallel parking 19. Allow for street light pole banners with the identifying area name and not count them toward attached signage limitations. 20. Allow for relief of the double island requirement on the parking lot facing Hensel Street. 21. Allow for hanging signs in accordance with the Northgate signage requirements with the following modifications: a. The sign will have 3 inches of clearance from the building face and 3 inches of clearance from the edge of the canopy 22. Allow for the following modifications to freestanding signs a. Allow 2 signs within 150 feet from each other at the interior intersection b. Allow for low profile signs to be placed at a zero foot setback 23. Allow for the following modifications to attached signage a. Allow the developments identification signs at the corner of Texas Avenue and University Drive to extend no more than 2 feet from any exterior building face, mansard, awning, or canopy 24. Allow for the following modification to light pole signs a. Light pole signs shall not exceed 21 square feet in size 25. Signage for the proposed leasing office and clubhouse will be based upon commercial sign standards and allow attached signage including blade identification signs, property identification signs and other signage allowed within multi -family and commercial zoning districts. The subject property is located at the most highly visible and traveled intersection in Brazos County. The City's Comprehensive Plan recognizes the importance of redeveloping the subject property and designated this area as both urban redevelopment and an anchor of the University Drive hospitality corridor. The Plan goes on to recommend some form of "direct market intervention by the City" that may involve "regulation", "investment" or "incentives" to encourage redevelopment activities in such prominent areas of the city. As stated in the LIDO, the purpose of the Planned Development District is to promote and encourage innovative development that is sensitive to surrounding land uses and to the natural environment. A PDD may be used to permit new or innovative concepts in land utilization not permitted by other zoning districts. Finally, the PDD allows development to vary from certain development standards so long as there are community benefits which outweigh the requested modifications. The redevelopment envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan is very urban in character; however, the City does not have an urban zoning classification or urban development standards. The PDD zoning classification is the only process currently available to implement the vertical mix of uses and urban character envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. In order to provide that urban character, we are required to modify current suburban development standards. We have utilized the city's existing development standards including the urban standards in the NG -1 Historic Northgate district. The modifications requested are essentially creating urban standards to be used outside of the historic Northgate district. We believe that this project offers significant community benefits that certainly outweigh the modifications being requested. These community benefits are as follows: 1. Implementation of the Comprehensive Plan at a critical intersection of the two busiest corridors in the entire county. The Plan states that the city should "focus on bringing vertical mixed-use and other aspects of urban character" to this portion of the city. 2. Creation of an urban mixed use concept development located in a highly visible redevelopment area and anchoring the University Drive hospitality corridor. 3. Converting an underperforming land use at a major intersection within close proximity to Texas A&M University identified specifically in the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Major redevelopment of a blighted property within two major image corridors as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 3 Creation of a major mixed use development that follows a Traditional Neighborhood Development concept, promotes Smart Growth principles, encourages walkability within close proximity to the University and creates a sense of place through a new outdoor plaza at the intersection of Texas Avenue and University Drive. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks again for all your help on the Veronica J.B. "ooi Managing Partner Cc: file I I I TEXAS AVENUE 'gym (100 R.O.W.) pN� N 9 o� TEXAS AVENUE �N 3/8 INCH IRON ! reao FOurvo� _ — 3/6 INCH IRON — — — — — — m ja Roo FOUND I 15' P.U.E. 26' ACCESS m, (107.5 R.O.W.) (11472/79) EASEMENT ��? R=25.00' N N D=89.24'25" 47°09 55 — (11472/79) — L=39.01' 59.11' — — — — — 24'x7.5' T=24.74' ACCESS S 47'41'50" E 495.19' LC=35.17' VAR. WIDTH PUE .._.. _.._.._.. _.. _.._.._. _. _.. — EASEMENT ��������� tiI F______________ � � CB -52'59'37"E N 87'07'38" E I (11975/276) 1996/331 14.32' WIDTHIAPAE. I VARIABLE _..___.. _.. _.._..___.. 1 I N I I I WIDTH P.A.E. I ? 20' OIL"ol I I I EASEMEM 24' ACCESS EASEMENT �I j w I (11472/79) 30' P.U.E I . I r I � I (11472/79) Is ZONING: C-1 ��LL VARIABLE f ® to I I I I x(1P.U.E. 119 j N (11193/160) 10' PUE LOT 1 ! Scalr. 1 (11975/276) rn LODGECO VARIABLE SUBDIVISION I I 13' EASEMENT I WIDTH P.A.E. VARIABLE i1 PLAT 1ING: CI 1 (1243/365) j WIDTH P.A.E. ZONING: CI 1.855 ACRE 1 I II ! 20' UTILITY APPLEBEE'S LOT 1 TRACT lI. RESTAURANTS BLOCK 1 I I I 7619/141 I S 47'53'16 E I TEXAS LLC. HOMES SUITES (& 0.067 ACRES j j36.91' LOT 1, BLOCK 1 (11472/79) I ROW QUIT CLAIM) ! `I VARIABLE II r I I TEXAN INN I L 9673/288) �I L� I I WIDTH P.A.E. VARIABLE II ADDITION ZONING: PDO ZONING GC LOT 1A j I �.\ (n1s3/1so) L_IT, 1/2 INCH IRON of BLOCK 1 ROD FOUND PLAT 726/201 SURAJ DEMLA, EQI COLLEGE NORTHPOINT I_.._.._.._..�._._.._.._.._.._.,_.. .. ._.._.._.._.. _.._„_.._.._.. ..I N (& 0.092 ACRES STATION r— a — ROW QUIT CLAIM 10' unulr 9673 288 PARTNERSHIP, LP w CROSSING j I—L — SUBDIVISION I L Fo' UmU I 10' ELECTRICAL M (11975/275) —J N . A(465/37) ZONING: GC & Cl ZONING: PDD w LOT 3 �y EASEMENT I IL �N BLOCK 1 Ila�� AT NORTH POI HOLDING-SHANS F I� SUBDIVISIONENTL.L.C. zl (11975/276) N i I I j I J A005001 JE SCOTT (ICL), ? TRACT 41, ACRES 169.7 ZONING: PDD Di 50.51' / o S 49.11'50” E STREHENSET I \ I WIDTH P.A.E. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM VARIABLE STREET I I I� I II 1 (50' R.O.W.) I IN ai VARIABLE I — 11 1 IO' UTILITY stn I\ WIDTH P.U.E. p EASEMENT `p VARIABLE (1 1 1 9 3/1 60) N 494/543 � WIDTH P.U.E. .�j ! w o' OU1r R / (1 1193/150) F DAENT r f( (726/201) OR J I IJ = I I UNIVERSITY VARIABLE 1 WIDTH P.A.E. I 1 DRIVE 20' UTILITY Z I P.0?E. N I WIDTHVARIABLE L4- P.A.E. j 1 FM 60 EASEMENT LI I �160� 18' x 20' PAE (11193/160) ! L _j I' I P.U.E. PAE. & P.U.E. (9673/291) I I tlS 132.5 R.O.W.) (ss]3/zsi) ( unuFv P.A.E. & P.U.E. (9673/291) (10778/253) 465/3]) (9673/291) I 5' UTILITY EASEMENT (10778/223) .._.. _.. _.._.._.AN _.. _.._.._.._.._.._.._.. j I WIP.A.E. a..U.E& EASEMENT1 VARIABLE —..._._. —.—._.—.—.—.—. .— — — — — — —._._. .—.—.—. — — —--------------------------------_ — 1.—. .—--------- ---------------------- .—.—.—.—.—. L _ _ LOT 1A DTH P J'��� S 40.56'04" W N 40'51'56" E I BLOCK 1 ]' % ]' PUE / l (,19]5/275) 20' 20.16' S 49'08'57° E 503.84' _ __ — — 08'57" W 202.12' ' NORTHPOINT 1'34'52" W __��E _ _ CROSSING 15.01N 49.12'0'9 W 93.38' SUBDVIISION s unu,r ...—...—...—...—_...—...—..._...—...—...—...—...—...—..._—...—...—...—...—..._...—...—...—... ...— ...—...EASEMFNr 11975/275(4ss/m) .—. .—. . .. ..—.._.�.._.. _.._.. .. _.._.._�. — (ZONING: POD)1 '�N 41'21'05" Ea.n.e. a.u.e. 19.96' P.U.E. VARIABLE VARIABLE VARIABLE J VARIABLE.A 7E, & 243) P.A.E \WIDTH P.U.E. WIDTH P.U.E. VARIABLE 1 WIDTH P.A.E. WIDTH P.U.E. LOT 1 (10778/243) WIDTH P.U.E. (9673/291) (11193/160) (11193/160) VARIABLE BLOCK 2 7.5' P.U.E. (1119,3/ 1 60) (10778/253) (11193/160) WIDTH P.A.E. (11193/160) Z ia' unu,r NORTH PARK (1 1 1 9 3/1 60) (10778/223) (11975/275) L j I� 1 FasFMENT ! N (& 0.041 ACRES IN (4ss/37) LOT2A N ROW QUIT CLAIM N / I _p� 10778/243 I I I BLOCK 1 j 1 7 ' P..E. ZONING: R-4 14TE NORrHP01NT Q j (11193/160) CROSSING lwO PRIVATE PARKING & ACCESS L ACCESS EASEMENT (EME1NSUBDIVISION 119(465/37) 3/60) \ (11975/275) MZONING: POO VARIABLE IN ___) WIDTH RAE. LOT 2 (11193/160) 0 BLOCK 2 ' I ! I I U NORTH PARK I 10' ELECTRICAL I O (& 0.007 ACRES z1 I \ EASEMENT I _ ROW QUIT CLAIM j 10' P.U.E. 805/533 & 10778/243) 10' P.U.E. (1 1 193/1 60) 10' P.U.E. ZONING: R-4 (11193/160) (1193/160) s i I � 971.79' � �� r 31Z3.92's �y =r 1/2 INCH IRON N 49'04'31" W 1285.71' Rao FourvD A005001 JE SCOTT (ICL), A005001 JE SCOTT (ICL), TRACT 41, ACRES 169.7 TRACT 41, ACRES 169.7 10' ELECTRICAL TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM EASEMENT TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM 663/36 LEGEND ❑ EX. ZONING: PDD GENERAL NOTES 1. BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION. 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE WITHIN A DESIGNATED FLOOD PLAIN AREA ACCORDING TO THE F.I.R.M. MAPS, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 48041CO215E, EFFECTIVE DATE MAY 16, 2012. 1� 617 13s IBI/ 765 CITY OF c� 2� J4 %11J14 ' M BRYAN °e P 65 �Zy7 56, �J B IO 8 J 9 2 G°4v 7 9 ,6 to , �'C 4 6 Bin 4 J 11 2 i l 14 � 4 p 2 ,� B 5 2I 7 // 7 2 m I IJ 0° 14 J 1615 5 4 9T re 17 7 6 F5, 25 6, IY B 9 A 8 0 a rn z y O� SNL At i Z w w a T AS M TEXAS A&M U IVER ITY 6° UNIVERSITY F� VICINITY MAP (N.T.S.) kl GENERAL NOTES 1. BICYCLE PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED IN EACH STRUCTURED GARAGE ON SITE. 11 LEGEND ISI VICINITY MAP (n.t.s.) IIII LEGAL DESCRIPTION II /'/, MIXED 1 sI FLOOR GENERAL ''a Al, DEVELOPER /i,,!: COMMERCIAL WITH ME ABOVE - LOT 1A, 2A & 3, BLOCK 1 Of NORTHPOINT (THE FIRST FLOOR MAY BE v0� COMMUNITIES, LLC. OR GENERAL SITE ,e CROSSING SUBDIVISION, COLLEGE STATION, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITH AT.ad COMMERCIAL LWITH lo: ayw:, cn.wosi e,m�9n�,u ism LEAST AS GENERAL ' -'a� BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS COMMERCIAL. - e 77--71 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LLLA ON GRADE ENSITY RESIDENTIOV R SURFACE s� SITE PARKINGAL ElSTRUCTURED PARKING - e) N APPLICANT OWNER DEVELOPER MITCHELL AND MORGAN WOODRIDGE COLLEGE CAPSTONE COLLEGIATE STATION 1, LLC. COMMUNITIES, LLC. s9oe E�fawe..Exx SORflI 1999nvN.wawsus sn,zaso arKavaxonre co:P.9•sw�.nnsaa lo: ayw:, cn.wosi e,m�9n�,u ism VOICE I9]91�bOE9W WICE:PIUIB14nW VIXCFIn'+9d9iW1 EM ryi9lxwwd EM I11018t6i9)1 Z Lli �X w 0 -za zU LU a 1—L 0 Q owwo l LE U) ¢ o OfLLI w o Q V ¢ ^ W O, w LLI O s U o U J war JJ z0 d 00 LJU a3 a = U (a Ix W I - 116 — d " 0 W CC) d a u ¢ x �JIEEiCp!rtEt1T5 PRD CONCEPT PIAN SHEET tl CP1a CONTACT: VERONICA MORGAN CONTACT: MICHAEL ROSENFELDCONTACT: VERONICA MORGAN CONTACT: MICHAEL ROSENFELD CTMWACT.AMANDAWALLIS EuuE. mna.mnv9,,.an Euu�n:m�R.ox�eyu..e„ �..x9Numsen�i�