HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/06/2015 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionCollege TX 1101 Texas
V� 9 „o, Station T 7
College Stafion, TX 77840
"^� """` Amended Meeting Agenda
Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop
The City Council may ormay not attend the Planning 8 Zoning
Commission Workshop Meeting.
Thursday, August 6, 2015 6:30 PM City Hall Council Chambers
1. Call the meeting to order.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
3. 15-0423 Discussion of Minor and Amending plats approved by Staff.
* Final Plat — Minor Plat — Parulian Subdivision Lot 39, Block 1 —
Case # FP2014-900309 (J.Schubert)
* Final Plat — Minor Replat — Redmond Terrace Lots 1 & 2, Block 8
Case # FPCO2015-000001 (J. Bullock)
* Final Plat — Minor Replat — Breezy Heights Lots 9A & 9B, Block 1
Case # FP2015-000001 (J.Schubert)
* Final Plat — Minor Plat — The Retreat at College Station — Case #
FP2015-000007 (L.Walker)
4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
5. 15-0411 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on Landscaping and
Tree Protection requirements in single-family neighborhoods. (L.
Walker)
A[[achmen[s: Memo
6. 15-0409 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z
Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
* Thursday, August 13, 2015 — City Council Meeting — Council
Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison -
Ross)
* Thursday, August 20, 2015 — P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers
Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m.
7. 15-0429 Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding an update
on the following item:
* A Conditional Use Permit for multi -family of the first floor for
approximately 7.4 acres located at 614 Holleman Dr E. The
Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 2, 2015 and
voted (4-0-1) to recommend approval. Commissioner Oldham
abstained. The City Council heard this item on July 23, 2015 and
voted (5-1) to approve the request.
College saloon, rx Page 1 Printed on 713112015
Planning and Zoning Commission Amended Meeting Agenda August 6, 2015
Workshop
8. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design
Review Board, BioCorridor Board, Joint Annexation Task Force
9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement
of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting.
10 Adjourn.
The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on
this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion.
"MaJO-061we
City Manager
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101
Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on 20xx at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48
hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 7643517 or (TDD) 1 800 735 2989. Agendas may be viewed on
www.cstx.gov. Council meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19.
College Station, TX Page 2 Printed on 7/312015
College Station, TX City Hal'
1101 Texas Ave
�- College Station, TX77840
groo'c—us--
<s-sn..w.�.
File #:
15-0423
Type:
Updates
File created:
7/28/2015
On agenda:
8/62015
Legislation Details (With Text)
Version: 1 Name: Minor and Amending Plats
Status: Agenda Ready
In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop
Final action:
Title: Discussion of Minor and Amending plats approved by Staff.
* Final Plat - Minor Plat - Parulian Subdivision Lot 39, Block 1 - Case # FP2014-900309 (J.Schubert)
* Final Plat - Minor Replat - Redmond Terrace Lots 1 & 2, Block 8 - Case # FPCO2015-000001
(J.Bullock)
* Final Plat - Minor Replat - Breezy Heights Lots 9A & 9B, Block 1 - Case # FP2015-000001
(J.Schubert)
* Final Plat - Minor Plat - The Retreat at College Station - Case # FP2015-000007 (L.Walker)
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments:
Date Ver. Action By Action Result
Discussion of Minor and Amending plats approved by Staff.
* Final Plat — Minor Plat — Parulian Subdivision Lot 39, Block 1 — Case # FP2014-900309
(J.Schubert)
* Final Plat — Minor Replat — Redmond Terrace Lots 1 & 2, Block 8 — Case # FPC02015-000001
(J.Bullock)
* Final Plat — Minor Replat — Breezy Heights Lots 9A & 9B, Block 1 — Case # FP2015-000001
(J.Schubert)
* Final Plat — Minor Plat — The Retreat at College Station — Case # FP2015-000007 (L.Walker)
College Station, TX Page 1 oft Punted on 8/3/2015
powered by Legis[arTM
College Station, TX City Hal'
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, TX 77840
goo.,0_.—
Legislation Details (With Text)
File #:
15-0411 Version: 1
Name:
Single -Family Tree Requirements
Type:
Presentation
Status:
Agenda Ready
File created:
7/23/2015
In control:
Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop
On agenda:
8/62015
Final action:
Title:
Presentation, possible action,
and discussion on Landscaping and Tree Protection requirements in
single-family neighborhoods.
(L. Walker)
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments:
Memo
Date
Ver. Action By
Action Result
Presentation, possible action, and discussion on Landscaping and Tree Protection requirements in
single-family neighborhoods. (L. Walker)
College Station, TX
Page 1 of 1
Punted on 8/3/2015
powered by Legis[arTM
(*�`
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
- H m of TexasAe3M University'
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 6, 2015
TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Laura Walker, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: Single -Family Landscape and Tree Protection
Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on Landscape and Tree Protection requirements in
single-family neighborhoods.
Summary: This workshop item was requested by Commissioner Rektorik in response to a citizen
presentation on the lack of trees on replatted and newly constructed home lots in the Southside area.
The purpose of this item is to present an overview of the ordinance requirements and discuss its
implementation.
Background: In December 2009, City Council approved ordinance #3222, requiring single-family and
townhouse developments to provide two trees of at least two inch caliper, or one tree of four inch
caliper, on each new lot. This ordinance has been interpreted as requiring trees on newly platted or
created lots since the ordinance was adopted in December 2009.
At the August 6`" P&Z Workshop meeting, staff will be prepared to discuss implementation and
application of the ordinance.
)�
tLCollege
doo.Po—x—.a
College Station, TX City Hal'
1101 Texas Ave
Station, TX77840
Legislation Details (With Text)
File #:
15-0409 Version: 1 Name: Upcoming Meeting
Type:
Updates Status: Agenda Ready
File created:
7/23/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop
On agenda:
8/62015 Final action:
Title:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
*Thursday, August 13, 2015 - City Council Meeting - Council Chambers - Workshop 6:00 p.m. and
Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison - Ross)
*Thursday, August 20, 2015 - P&Z Meeting - Council Chambers - Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular
7:00 p.m.
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments:
Date
Ver. Action By Action Result
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
* Thursday, August 13, 2015 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and
Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison - Ross)
* Thursday, August 20, 2015 — P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular
7:00 p.m.
College Station, TX
Page 1 of 1
Punted on 8/3/2015
powered by Legis[arTM
College Station, TX City Hal'
)� 1101 Texas Ave
tLCollege Station, TX77840
goo.,g. .—
Legislation Details (With Text)
File #:
15-0429 Version: 1 Name: updates
Type:
Updates Status: Agenda Ready
File created:
7/28/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop
On agenda:
8/62015 Final action:
Title:
Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding an update on the following item:
*A Conditional Use Permit for multi -family ofthe first floor for approximately 7.4 acres located at 614
Holleman Dr E. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 2, 2015 and voted (4-0-1)
to recommend approval. Commissioner Oldham abstained. The City Council heard this item on July
23, 2015 and voted (5-1) to approve the request.
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments:
Date
Ver. Action By Action Result
Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding an update on the following item:
* A Conditional Use Permit for multi -family of the first floor for approximately 7.4 acres located at 614
Holleman Dr E. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 2, 2015 and voted (4-0-
1) to recommend approval. Commissioner Oldham abstained. The City Council heard this item on
July 23, 2015 and voted (5-1) to approve the request.
College Station, TX
Page 1 of 1
Punted on 8/3/2015
powered by Legis[arTM
V�
College TX 1Texa"
9 1101TexasT 7
College Stafion, TX ]]840
"^� u""`°�'"^`�
y,
Amended Meeting Agenda
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
The City Council may ormay not attend the Planning 8 Zoning
Commission Regular Meeting.
Thursday, August 6, 2015 7:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers
1. Call meeting to order.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Hear Citizens.
At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the
Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen
presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who
wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the
agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into
the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is
made of the meeting, please give your name and address for the record.)
All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans
and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision
regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff
recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any
Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to
the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
4. Consent Agenda
4.1 15-0422 Consideration, possible action and discussion to approve meeting
minutes.
• July 16, 2015 — Workshop
• July 16, 2015 — Regular
Affachmenfs: July 16 2015 Workshop
July 162015 Regular
4.2 15-0415 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat
for Indian Lakes Subdivision Phase 21 consisting of 12 residential
lots and one common area on approximately 22.963 acres located
at 3900 Makawee Court, generally located west of State Highway 6
and south of Deer Park Drive in the College Station Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction. Case # FP2015-900011 (M. Bombek)
College Saloon, rx Page 1 Printed on 8/3/2015
Planning and Zoning Commission Amended Meeting Agenda August 6, 2015
Regular
Attachments: Staff Report
Application
Final Plat
4.3 15-0413 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat
for Indian Lakes Subdivision Phase 19 consisting of 16 residential
lots and one common area on approximately 34.483 acres located
at 3900 Mesa Verde Drive, generally located west of State
Highway 6 and south of Deer Park Drive in the College Station
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case # FP2015-900012 (M. Bombek)
Attachments: Staff Report
Application
Final Plat
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
6. 15-0416
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified
Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to GS
General Suburban for approximately 1.57 acres being the east 1/
of Lot 10, Bald Prairie Subdivision, according to the plat recorded
in volume 321, page 571 of the deed records of Brazos County,
Texas, and being the same tract of land as described by a deed to
Jeffery Joe Morgan Recorded in volume 3956, Page 223 of the
Official Public Records of College Station, Brazos County, Texas.
Generally located at 14015 Renee Lane, more generally located
north of Barron Road and between Renee Lane and Victoria
Avenue. Case # REZ2015-000007 (M. Bombek) (Note: Final action
on this item is scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council
meeting - subject to change)
Attachments:
Staff Report
Application
Rezoning Map
7. 15-0419
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified
Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from GC General
College Station, TX
Page 2 Printed on 8132015
Planning and Zoning Commission Amended Meeting Agenda August 6, 2015
Regular
Commercial to PDD Planned Development District for
approximately 12 acres being situated in the Robert Stevenson
Survey, Abstract No. 54, College Station, Brazos County, Texas,
and being part of Lot 3- 15.81 acres, Barron Park Subdivision,
according to the plat recorded in Volume 939, Page 209, of the
Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, said Lot 3 being
described in the following three deeds: to DWS Development, Inc.,
in Volume 3082, Page 297, and Volume 4735, Page 142, both of
the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and to Mel Formby
in Volume 4802, Page 89, of the Official Records of Brazos
County, Texas, located on the northern boundary of Christ United
Methodist Church along State Highway 6 South. Case
#REZ2015-000008 (J. Bullock) (Note: Final action on this item is
scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council meeting - subject
to change)
Attachments: Staff Report
Application
Rezoning Map
Concept Plan
8. 15-0421 Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified
Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries for approximately 2.429
acres from O Office and GC General Commercial to PDD Planned
Development District for a hotel development, being located in the
Richard Carter Survey, Abstract No. 8, College Station, Brazos
County, Texas. Said tract being all of Lot 1, Black Eyed Pea
Addition, according to the plat recorded in Volume 1233, Page 531
of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and all of Lots
3-11 and a portion of Lot 2, Block "A", College Heights, according
to the plat recorded in Volume 124, Page 259 of the Deed Records
of Brazos County, Texas; being located at 201 University Drive
East, 403, 405, 409 Jane Street, and 400, 402, 406 A&B, 408
Eisenhower Street, and being more generally located north of
University Drive East between Jane Street and Eisenhower Street.
Case #REZ2015-000010 (J.Prochazka) (Note: Final action on this
item is scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council meeting -
subject to change.)
College Station, TX Page 3 Printed on 8132015
Planning and Zoning Commission Amended Meeting Agenda August 6, 2015
Regular
Attachments: Staff Report
Application
Modifications Request Letter
Rezoning Map
Concept Plan
9. 15-0408 Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion
regarding an amendment to Chapter 12, "Unified Development
Ordinance," Article 8 "Subdivision Design and Improvements,"
Section 12-8.3 "General Requirements and Minimum Standards of
Design for Subdivisions within the City Limits," Section W
"Single -Family Residential Parking Requirements for Platting," and
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 11
"Definitions" Section 11.2 "Defined Terms" of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, regarding
Single -Family Residential Parking Requirements for Platting. Case
#ORDA2015-000002 (J. Prochazka) (Note: Final action on this
item is scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council meeting -
subject to change.)
Attachments: Staff Memo
Proposed Ordinance
10. Discussion and possible action on future
Member may inquire about a subject for which
of specific factual information or the recitation
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to
subsequent meeting.
11. Adjourn
agenda items — A Planning & Zoning
notice has not been given. A statement
of existing policy may be given. Any
place the subject on an agenda for a
The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on
this agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
An announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion.
City Manager
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101
Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on 20xx at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
College Station, TX Page 4 Printed on 8132015
Planning and Zoning Commission Amended Meeting Agenda August 6, 2015
Regular
This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48
hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 7643517 or (TDD) 1 800 735 2989. Agendas may be viewed on
www.cstx.gov. Council meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19.
College Station, TX Page 5 Printed on 8132015
College Station, TX City Hal'
)� 1101 Texas Ave
tLCollege Station, TX77840
goo.,g—.—
Legislation Details (With Text)
File #:
15-0422 Version: 1
Name:
Minutes
Type:
Minutes
Status:
Agenda Ready
File created:
7/27/2015
In control:
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda:
8/62015
Final action:
Title:
Consideration, possible action
and discussion
to approve meeting minutes.
' July 16, 2015 - Workshop
' July 16, 2015 - Regular
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments: July 16 2015 Workshop
July 16 2015 Regular
Date Ver. Action By Action Result
Consideration, possible action and discussion to approve meeting minutes.
• July 16, 2015 — Workshop
• July 16, 2015 — Regular
College Station, TX
Page 1 of 1
Punted on 8/3/2015
powered by Legis[arTM
(*0Fq"
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home ofTo= AdM University'
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Workshop Meeting
July 16, 2015, 6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Casey Oldham, Jerome Rektorik, and Barry Moore
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jim Ross, Kirk Joseph, and Jodi Warner
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Karl Mooney
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason
Schubert, Danielle Singh, Erika Bridges, Jessica Bullock, Mark Bombek, Madison Thomas, Laura Walker,
David Schmitz, Robin Cross, Lauren Basey, and Brittany Caldwell
1. Call the meeting to order.
Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding Regular Agenda Item 7.
Commissioner Rektorik stated that he would be removing the July 2, 2015 Regular Agenda minutes
from the Consent Agenda to clarify the motion for Agenda Item 8.
3. Presentation Discussion of Minor and Amending plats approved by Staff.
* Final Plat — Minor Plat — Creek Meadows Section 5 Phase 3 — Case # FP2015-000011 (M.Thomas)
There was no discussion.
4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items in the 2015 P&Z Plan of Work
(see attached). (J. Schubert)
Principal Planner Schubert gave an update on the status of items in the 2015 P&Z Plan of Work.
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on Parkland Dedication assessment for multi -family
development. (J.Prochazka)
Principal Planner Prochazka gave an overview of the Parkland Dedication assessment for multi -family
development.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission and Staff regarding the overview.
July 16, 2015 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
Commissioner Oldham asked that this item be revisited and that a model be brought to the Commission.
7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
* Thursday, July 23, 2015 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and
Regular 7:00 p.m.
* Thursday, August 6, 2015 — P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular
7:00 p.m.
Chairperson Kee reviewed the calendar of upcoming meetings for the Planning & Zoning Commission.
8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items:
* A Comprehensive Plan Amendment for approximately 22.26 acres located at 3940 and 4300 North
Graham Road from Restricted Suburban to General Suburban. The Planning & Zoning Commission
heard this item on June 18, 2015 and voted (3-2) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this
item on July 9, 2015 and voted (5-1) to deny the request.
* A rezoning of approximately 22.26 acres located at 3940 and 4300 North Graham Road from R Rural
to GS General Suburban. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on June 18, 2015 and
voted (3-2) to approve the request. The City Council heard this item on July 9, 2015 and voted (5-1) to
deny the request.
* A Comprehensive Plan Amendment for approximately 25 acres located at 4201 Rock Prairie Road
from Estate and Restricted Suburban to Restricted Suburban and Suburban Commercial. The Planning
& Zoning Commissioner heard this item on June 18, 2015 and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The
City Council heard this item on July 9, 2015 and voted (6-0) to approve the request.
* A rezoning of approximately 20.872 acres from R Rural to 17.14 acres of RS Restricted Suburban and
3.732 acres of SC Suburban Commercial located at 4201 Rock Prairie Road. The Planning & Zoning
Commission heard this item on June 18, 2015 and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council
heard this item on July 9, 2015 and voted (6-0) to delay the request until August 13, 2015.
Chairperson Kee reviewed the above-mentioned items heard by City Council.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission and Staff regarding these items.
9. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board,
BioCorridor Board, Joint Annexation Task Force.
Chairperson Kee gave an update on the Joint Annexation Task Force and the Design Review Board.
Assistant Director Hitchcock gave an update on the BioCorridor.
10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire
about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the
recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the
subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Commissioner Rektorik asked for a future agenda item to receive the Economic Development
presentation that was given to the joint annexation task force.
July 16, 2015 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
Commissioner Oldham asked for future agenda items regarding how the Comprehensive Plan is
implemented to prepare areas of the city for future development.
11. Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:07 p.m.
Approved:
Attest:
Jane Kee, Chairperson Robin Krause, Address Technician
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
July 16, 2015 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
(*0Fq"
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home ofTo= A&M University'
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
July 16, 2015, 7:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Jane Kee, Casey Oldham, Jerome Rektorik, and Barry Moore
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jim Ross, Kirk Joseph, and Jodi Warner
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Karl Mooney
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason
Schubert, Danielle Singh, Erika Bridges, Jessica Bullock, Mark Bombek, Madison Thomas, Laura Walker,
David Schmitz, Robin Cross, Lauren Basey, and Brittany Caldwell
1. Call Meeting to Order
Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m.
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Hear Citizens
No citizens spoke.
3. Consent Agenda
4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from meetings.
* Kirk Joseph — July 16, 2015
* Jodi Warner — July 16, 2015
4.2 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes.
* June 18, 2015 — Workshop
* June 18, 2015 — Regular
* July 2, 2015 — Workshop
* July 2, 2015 — Regular
Commissioner Rektorik asked that the July 2, 2015 Regular meeting minutes be removed from
the Consent Agenda.
Commissioner Oldham motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1 and 4.2, except the July
2, 2015 regular minutes. Commissioner Rektorik seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0).
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by
Commission action.
July 16, 2015 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
Commissioner Rektorik removed July 2, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes from the Consent Agenda
Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve the July 2, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes with
the condition that the motion for Regular Agenda Item 8 be amended to read that the approval
would allow multi -family residential use on the entirety of the ground floor. Commissioner
Moore seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0).
6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Herman F.
Krenek Subdivision Phase Two, Lot 5B -R being a replat of Kirkpatrick Subdivision Lot 2, Block 1,
Herman F. Krenek Subdivision Phase Two, Lot 513, and the adjoining 0.665 acre unplatted tract
Morgan Rector League, A-46, consisting of one lot on 2.61 acres, located at 2315 & 2317 Texas
Avenue South, more generally located near the northeast corner of the intersection of Texas Avenue
South and Brentwood Drive. Case #FP2014-900273 (J. Schubert)
Principal Planner Schubert presented the Replat and recommended approval with the condition that
the easements shown on the Replat figure as "this portion of easement to be abandoned" be depicted
as existing easements with volume and page. If the easement abandonments are approved by Council
prior to recordation of the plat, they may be removed from the plat.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the Replat.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
No one spoke during the public hearing.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve the Replat with the condition recommended by
Staff. Commissioner Moore seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0).
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from
GC General Commercial and OV Corridor Overlay to GC General Commercial for approximately
4.73 acres being Lot 1, Block 16 of Glenhaven Estates Phase 6, generally located on the southwest
corner of University Drive East and Glenhaven Drive. Case # REZ2015-000004 (M. Bombek)
(Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the August 13, 2015 City Council meeting - subject
to change)
Staff Planner Bombek presented the rezoning and recommended approval.
Veronica Morgan, 3204 Earl Rudder Freeway, College Station, Texas, gave an overview of the
proposed rezoning.
Chairperson Kee opened the public hearing.
Mary Ann Fanguy, 705 Summerglen, College Station, Texas, asked for clarification on the buffer
requirements.
July 16, 2015 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
Staff Planner Bombek stated that the same buffer requirements would be required as was with the
existing rezoning.
Chairperson Kee closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Rektorik recommended approval of the rezoning. Commissioner Moore
seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0).
8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire
about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or
the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to
place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion.
9. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
Approved:
Attest:
Jane Kee, Chairperson Robin Krause, Address Technician
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
July 16, 2015 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
)�
tLCollege
doo.P0—.w.
College Station, TX City Hal'
1101 Texas Ave
Station, TX77840
Legislation Details (With Text)
File #:
15-0415 Version: 1 Name: Indian Lakes Subdivision Phase 21- Final Plat
Type:
Final Plat Status: Agenda Ready
File created:
7/27/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda:
8/62015 Final action:
Title:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Subdivision
Phase 21 consisting of 12 residential lots and one common area on approximately 22.963 acres
located at 3900 Makawee Court, generally located west of State Highway 6 and south of Deer Park
Drive in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case # FP2015-900011 (M. Bombek)
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments:
Staff Report
Application
Final Plat
Date
Ver. Action By Action Result
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Subdivision
Phase 21 consisting of 12 residential lots and one common area on approximately 22.963 acres
located at 3900 Makawee Court, generally located west of State Highway 6 and south of Deer Park
Drive in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case # FP2015-900011 (M. Bombek)
College Station, TX
Page 1 of 1
Punted on 8/3/2015
powered by Legis[arTM
(*t/q"
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Final Plat
for
Indian Lakes Subdivision Phase 21
FP2016-900011
SCALE: 12 residential lots and one common area on 22.963 acres
LOCATION: 3900 Makawee Court, generally located west of State Highway 6 and
south of Deer Park Drive in the College Station Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction.
ZONING: N/A (ETJ)
APPLICANT: Travis Martinek
PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Bombek, Staff Planner
mbombek@csbc.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3
August 6, 2015
'� �=
r
>' i
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation:
Zoning:
Preliminary Plan:
Site development
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication:
Greenways:
N/A (ETJ)
N/A (ETJ)
The Preliminary Plan for this phase was approved on September
18, 2014
Vacant
This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ETJ
prior to parkland dedication requirements being applicable in
the ETJ. Therefore, no parkland dedication is required.
N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: This site is located in the ETJ. No sidewalks are required.
Bicycle Connectivity: This site is located in the ETJ. No facilities for bicycle connectivity
are required.
Impact Fees: N/A
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance
with the approved Preliminary Plan and the applicable Subdivision Regulations within the
Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3
August 6, 2015
(*Or""
CITY OP COLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas AdM University'
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITTED:
TIME:
STAFF
4-2��::
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending 0 Final ❑ Vacating ❑ Replat
($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ? 0 Yes ❑ No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential X❑
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
0-'$700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
❑ $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
❑ $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
ue prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
T Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
Si:not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
x (6) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
�fwo (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control pians with supporting drainage report.
, /,Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
❑ Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
0 Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
0 Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference N/A
NAME OF PROJECT Indian Lakes - Phase 21
ADDRESS Near intersection of Mesa Verde Drive and Kachina Cove 4
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
Near intersection of Mesa Verde Drive and Kachina Cove
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Travis Martinek E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
City Bryan
Phone Number (979) 846-4384
State Texas
Zip Code 77802
Fax Number (979) 846-1461
Revised 4/14 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMA i iON (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd. E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
City Bryan State Texas Zip Code 77802
Phone Number (979) 846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
City College Station
Phone Number (979) 693-3838
E-mail Jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
State Texas Zip Code 77845
Fax Number (979) 693-2554
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑X Yes ❑ No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume N/A and Page No. N/A
Total Acreage 22.963
Existing Use Vacant
Number of Lots By Zoning District
N/A
Total No. of Lots 12 R -O -W Acreage 2.778
Proposed Use Single -Family Residential
I N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
N/A / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A
Floodplain Acreage 0.000
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? r', Yes n No
This information is necessary to help staff identity the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
Yes
F No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: Indian Lakes Subdivision
City Project Number (if known): Unknown
Date / Timeframe when submitted: 2000
Revised 4/14 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable);
VAA — -
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
'VIA
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. r', An alternative pedestrian way or multi -use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. r; The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the LIDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. FF A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. j--; Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate /
rural context;
5. F7, When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi -use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
Revised 4/14 Page 3 of 9
6. r' The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. FI The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway / Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan - Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
N/A
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participation NIA
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
N/A
Streets
N/A
Sidewalks
N/A
Sanitary Sewer Lines
N/A
Water Lines
N/A
Channels
N/A
Storm Sewers
N/A
Bike Lanes / Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:
NSA_- No. of acres to be dedicated + $ N/A development fee
N/A No. of acres in floodplain
N/A No. of acres in detention
N/A No. of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
N/A No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ NIA = $ N/A
N/A (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Signature andjA Date
Revised 4114 Page 4 of 9
i
Lot 20
Block 8
lndion Lok V.6055, . 5Phose V
66055
L4
n
ail
000
i I
Lot 19
3
It
/ A �
H
Lot 18 \\\�
motion Mo �l gs.
10' P.U.E. /sa
(6055/257)
CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF BRAZOS
I, Paul Clarke, Manager Smiling Mallard Management, LLC,
the general partner of Smiling Mallard Development, LTD.,
owner and developer of the land shown on this plat, and
designated herein as INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION, PHASE XM of
Brazos County, Texas, and whose name is subscribed hereto,
hereby dedicate to the use of the public forever, all streets,
alleys, parka, greenways, infrastructure, easements, and public
places thereon shown for the purpose and consideration
therein expressed. All such dedications shall be in fee simple
unless expressly provided otherwise.
Smiling Mallard Development, LTD.
By: Smiling Mallard Development Management, LLC.
Its: General Partner
By: Paul Clarke
Its: Manager
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF BRAZOS
Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day
personally appeared . known
to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he
executed the some for the purpose and consideration therein
stated.
Given under 2yy hand and seal on this _ day of
Notary Public, Brazos County, Texas
Scale:
1 "=100'
8.276 Acre
ROA Common Area
and Conservation Buffer
A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL
�------1--------
Ha/ona Court
- 70' R.O.W. 24' pavement
III III III , ,�
� Lot 16
l it I I i I� I
Lot 14 Lot 15
i
Lot 12 I i I Lot 13 I I Block 30
Lot 11 I I I /nd/an Lakes
III lIl I
I I I Iii I I i I II SulxL Ph. XlX I - - � i L
Smiling Mallard Development Ltd.
A Ac
Remainder oV iayz2_.51ro Tract Two
This subdivision plat was duly approved by the Commissioners
Court of Brazos County, Texas, as the Final Plat of such
subdivision on the _ day of
20
Signed this the _ day of
20
County Judge
Brazos County, Texas
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR AND/OR ENGINEER
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF BRAZOS
I, Kevin R. McClure, Registered Professional Land Surveyor
No. 5650, in the State of Texas, hereby certify that this plat
is true and correct and was prepared from an actual survey
of the property and that property markers and monuments
were placed under my supervision on the ground.
Kevin R. McClure, R.P.L.S. No. 5650
Cd X3117[?_�I �d�als7 �:[rlla � X:7
I, . City
Engineer of the City of College Station, Texas, hereby certify
that this Subdivision Plat conforms to the requirements of the
Subdivision Regulations of the City of College Station.
Future lu r.v.c•
W- 1359.85' --- --llF_
II � I III LII,
i I I III Called 17.41 Ac.
Ili Tract 1 of Tract Four I I
Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd.
III 148765, P. 176
11 I I I
II III ISI III �. II
FIELD NOTES
Being all that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the J. M.
BARRERA SURVEY, Abstract No. 69, Brazos County, Texas and being part of the
1037.24 acre Tract Two described in the deed from Thousand Oaks Development
Company Joint Venture to Smiling Mallard Development Ltd. recorded in Volume 4247,
Page 51, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas (O.R.B.C.), part of the 16.66
acre Tract 1 of Tract Two described in the deed from Partnere in Habitat Preservation,
LLC to Smiling Mallard Development Ltd. recorded in Volume 8765. Page 176 (O.R.B.C.)
and part of the 17.41 acre Tract 1 of Tract Four described in the deed from Partners
in Habitat Preservation, LLC to Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd. recorded in Volume
8765, Page 176 (O.R.B.C.), and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING: at a found 1/2 -inch iron rod marking the southeast comer of Lot 19,
Block 8, INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION, PHASE V as recorded in Volume 6055, Page 257
(O.R.B.C.);
THENCE: N 01' 25' 55" W along the east line of said INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION, PHASE
V (6055/257) for a distance of 432.29 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod set for corner;
THENCE: crossing through the said 1037.24 acre tract (4247/51), the said 16.66 acre
tract (8765/176) and the said 17.41 acre tract (8765/176) for the following six (6)
calls:
LINE
II
i I
16.66 Acres
L1
1) N 86' 57' 25" E for
a
distance of
1808.47 feet
to a 1/2 -inch iron rod
set
for
CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
L4
S 4743'32" E
134.00'
L5
comer,
64.36'
L6
S 414'50'1 1 " W
137.38'
L7
S 742'58" W
230.67'
21.03'
City Engineer
S 6751'43" W
20.41'
2) S 07 42' 58" W for
a
distance of
321.04 feet
to a 3/4 -inch iron pipe
set
for
STATE OF TEXAS
48'11'23"
City of College Station
21.03'
11.18'
the Point of Curvature
of a curve to
the left,
84'14'26"
25.00'
36.76'
22.61'
N 4450'11" E
33.53'
C7
3550'26"
3) 41.14 feet along the
aro of said curve having a
central angle of 05' 07'
26", a
COUNTY OF BRAZOS
radius of 460.00 feet,
a
tangent of 20.58 feet and a long chord bearing S
00'
09'
I, Karen McQueen. County Clerk, in and
for said County,
15" W at a distance
of
41.12 feet
to a 3/4 -inch iron pipe set for the Point
of
CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Tangency,
do hereby certify that this plat together
with its certificates
4) S 07 24' 28" E fora
distance of
214.86 feet
to a 1/2 -inch iron rod
set
for
of authentication was filed for record
in my office the
I, .
Chairman
of the
comer,
day of . 20 in
the Official Records
Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of
College
5)S 86' 57' 25" W for
a
distance of
1359.85 feet
to a 1/2 -inch iron rod
set
for
of Brazos County, Texas in Volume
Page
Station, hereby certify that the attached
plat was duly
comer, and
approved by the Commission on the
day of
6) N 74 22' 35" W for
a
distance of
447.42 feet
to the POINT OF BEGINNING
and
Witness my hand and official Seal, at
my office in Bryan,
20
containing 22.963 acres
of land, more or less.
Texas.
,. 11 A,,.,
County Clerk
Brazos County, Texas
I�
i I
II
�I
LINE
II
i I
16.66 Acres
L1
Tract 1 of Tract Tiro
321.04-
Smiling Mo/lord
S 724'280 E
Development Ltd.
L3
148765, P. 176
;
u
E
P
Wo
a
aw
ing,
30' Wide Easement
JI V.296, P.248 (No infrastructure)
�25' P.D.E.
(by separate instrument)
18.304 Acre
Poul Clarke
1412330, P.215
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S 742'58" W
321.04-
L2
S 724'280 E
214.86-
L3
S 724'28" E
228.06'
L4
S 4743'32" E
134.00'
L5
N 441410" E
64.36'
L6
S 414'50'1 1 " W
137.38'
L7
S 742'58" W
230.67'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
TANGENT
CHORD BRG.
CHORD DIST.
Cl
5'07'26"
460.00'
41.14'
20.58'
S 0'09'15" W
41.12'
C2
90'38'08"
25.00'
39.55'
25.28'
N 47'43'32" W
35.55'
C3
48'11'23"
25.00'
21.03'
11.18'
S 6751'43" W
20.41'
C4
276'22'46"
65.00'
313.54'
-58.14'
S 3'02'35" E
86.67'
C5
48'11'23"
25.00'
21.03'
11.18'
S 68'56'54" E
20.41'
C6
84'14'26"
25.00'
36.76'
22.61'
N 4450'11" E
33.53'
C7
3550'26"
65.00'
40.66'
21.02'
S 3'02'35" E
40.00'
Vicinity Map
GENERAL NOTES,
1. The record bearings and actual measured distances to the found 1/2" iron rods
along the adjoining phases of Indian Lakes Subdivision were used as the basis of
the bearing system shown on this final plat.
2. According to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Brazos County, Texas and
Incorporated Areas, Map Number 48041CO350E, Map Revised May 16, 2012, this
property is not located in the Special Flood Hazard Area.
3. Building Line Setbacks:
Front = 50'
Side - 15'
Rear = 25'
4. All Common Areas and Conservation Buffers are owned and maintained by the
Homeowners' Association. See the covenants, conditions, and restrictions for additional
information.
5. Unless otherwise indicated, all distances shown along curves are aro distances.
6. Notes from the Brazos County Health Department:
a.) All lots served by an OSSF must comply with county and state regulations. No
OSSF may be installed on any lot without the issuance of an "authorization to
construct" issued by the Brazos County Health Department under the provisions
of the Private Sewage Facility Regulations adopted by the Commissioners Court of
Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of section 21.084 of the Texas Water
Code. No OSSF drain field is to encroach on the 100 -foot sanitary zone of
private water wells or 150 feet of public water wells.
b.) All lots will be required to have a site/soil evaluation on file with the Brazos
County Health Department before on-site sewage facility may be constructed.
c.) On-site sewage facility disposal areas shall not encroach the 100 foot or the
150 foot sanitary zone of a private or public well, respectively.
7. Wellborn Special Utility District will provide water service for the subdivision.
8. There is a minimum 50' wide Drainage Buffer (25' on each side of the centerline of
all drainage ways). See the covenants, conditions, and restrictions for additional
information.
9. There is a 16' Public Utility Easement and a 10' Homeowners Association Easement
along the right-of-way frontage of all lots.
10. H.OA Easements along all streets run parallel to and adjacent to the public utility
easements shown hereon. H.O.A. Easement activities and/or infrastructure is
referenced in the covenants, conditions, and restrictions of the subdivision.
11. All proposed lots must be no more than 500 feet from a fire hydrant based on the
lay of hose along the street.
12. This property is located within the College Station Independent School District.
13. No construction or fencing shall impede, constrict, or block the flow of water in any
Private Drainage Easement. All Private Drainage Easements shall be maintained by the
Home Owner's Association.
14. Lots 1 and 12, Block 32 shall have driveway access to Makowee Court only.
15. Unless otherwise indicated 1/2" Iron Rods are set at all comers.
O - 1/2" Iron Rod Found
0 - 1/2" Iron Rod Set
0 - 3/4" Iron Pipe Set
O - 3/4" Iron Pipe Found
0 - PK Nail Control Monuments set in SL of asphalt pavement for reference.
16. Abbreviation:
B.S.L. - Building Setback Line
H.OAC.A. - Homeowners Association Common Area
H.OAE. - Homeowners Association Easement
H.OALs.E. - Homeowners Association Landscape Easement
P.D.E. - Public Drainage Easement
Pr.D.E. - Private Drainage Easement
P.O.B. - Point of Beginning
P.U.E. - Public Utility Easement
FINAL PLAT
INDIAN LAKES
SUBDIVISION, PHASE XXI
LOTS 1-12, BLOCKS 32
22.963 ACRES
J.M. BARRERA SURVEY, A-69
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
JANUARY, 2015
SCALE- 1"= 100'
Owner Surveyor
Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd. McClure d; Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
3608 East 29th Street 1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103
Bryan, Texas 77802 College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 846-4384 (979) 693-3838 U■ `-'m
)�
tLCollege
doo.P0—.w.
College Station, TX City Hal'
1101 Texas Ave
Station, TX77840
Legislation Details (With Text)
File #:
15-0413 Version: 1 Name: Indian Lakes Subdivision Phase 19- Final Plat
Type:
Final Plat Status: Agenda Ready
File created:
7/24/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda:
8/62015 Final action:
Title:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Subdivision
Phase 19 consisting of 16 residential lots and one common area on approximately 34.483 acres
located at 3900 Mesa Verde Drive, generally located west of State Highway 6 and south of Deer Park
Drive in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case # FP2015-900012 (M. Bombek)
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments:
Staff Report
Application
Final Plat
Date
Ver. Action By Action Result
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Subdivision
Phase 19 consisting of 16 residential lots and one common area on approximately 34.483 acres
located at 3900 Mesa Verde Drive, generally located west of State Highway 6 and south of Deer Park
Drive in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case # FP2015-900012 (M. Bombek)
College Station, TX
Page 1 of 1
Punted on 8/3/2015
powered by Legis[arTM
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Final Plat
For
Indian Lakes Subdivision Phase 19
FP2016-900012
SCALE: 16 residential lots and one common area on 34.483 acres.
LOCATION: 3900 Mesa Verde Drive, generally located west of State Highway 6
and south of Deer Park Drive in the College Station Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction.
ZONING: N/A (ETJ)
APPLICANT: Travis Martinek
PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Bombek, Staff Planner
mbombek@csbc.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3
August 6, 2015
',
�'f
� ..
/�'.' ,
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation:
Zoning:
Preliminary Plan:
Site development
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication:
Greenways:
N/A (ETJ)
N/A (ETJ)
The Preliminary Plan for this phase was approved on September
18, 2014
Vacant
This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ETJ
prior to parkland dedication requirements being applicable in
the ETJ. Therefore, no parkland dedication is required.
N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: This site is located in the ETJ. No sidewalks are required.
Bicycle Connectivity: This site is located in the ETJ. No facilities for bicycle connectivity
are required.
Impact Fees: N/A
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance
with the approved Preliminary Plan and the applicable Subdivision Regulations within the
Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3
August 6, 2015
CITY Or, COLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University'
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
FOR OFFICE USE
CASE NO.: Il I_�(/1
DATE SUBMITTED: 114 '
TIME: Z:5�71
STAFF:��
�J
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending Q Final ❑ Vacating Replat
($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ? 0 Yes ❑ No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential 0
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
\ $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
❑ $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
❑ $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
11% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Rease attach pages if additional information is provided.
UK"Six (6) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
❑X Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
❑x Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
ncumbrances, etc.
Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference N/A
NAME OF PROJECT Indian Lakes - Phase 19
ADDRESS Near intersection of Mesa Verde Drive and Kachina Cove qI
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
Near intersection of Mesa Verde Drive and Kachina Cove
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Travis Martinek E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
City Bryan
Phone Number (979) 846-4384
State Texas
Zip Code 77802
Fax Number (979) 846-1461
Revised 4/14 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMA I ION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd. E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
City Bryan State Texas Zip Code 77802
Phone Number (979) 846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
City College Station
Phone Number (979) 693-3838
E-mail Jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
State Texas Zip Code 77845
Fax Number (979) 693-2554
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑X Yes ❑ No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume N/A and Page No.
Total Acreage 34.480 Total No. of Lots 16 R -O -W Acreage 6.228
Existing Use Vacant Proposed Use Single -Family Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District N/A / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
N/A / N/A N/A I N/A N/A / N/A N/A N/A
Floodplain Acreage 0.000
N/A
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? r1 Yes r1 No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
r'I Yes
rl No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: Indian Lakes Subdivision
City Project Number (if known): Unknown
Date / Timeframe when submitted: 2000
Revised 4/14 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): _
'VIA
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
VIA
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. rl An alternative pedestrian way or multi -use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. j-1 The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. r_! A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. r! Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate /
rural context;
5. r! When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi -use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
Revised 4/14 Page 3 of 9
6. FI The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. [7 The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway / Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan - Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
N/A
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize ParticipationN/A
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
N/A
Streets
N/A
Sidewalks
N/A
Sanitary Sewer Lines
N/A
Water Lines
N/A
Channels
N/A
Storm Sewers
N/A
Bike Lanes / Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:
N/A No. of acres to be dedicated + $ N/A development fee
N/A No. of acres in floodplain
N/A No. of acres in detention
N/A No. of acres in greenways
[07;7
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
N/A No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ N/A $ N/A
N/A (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
P ;PI ]I 3 IS 110-'e4o
Signature an ti Date
Revised 4/14 Page 4 of 9
CURIE TABLE
LINE TABLE
LINE
RADIUS
BEARING
TANGENT
DISTANCE
L1
S
1'45'47"
E
100.02•
L2
N
3'02.35'
W
100.00'
L3
N
3'02.35'
W
33.24'
L4
N
3'02.35'
W
30.00'
L5
S
41'57'25"
W
134.35'
L6
N
3'02'35"
W
89.92'
L7
S
3'02'35'
E
89.92'
L8
S
48'02'35"
E
134.35-
L9
S
2.42'58'
W
205.44'
L10
S
4445'58"
W
137.56'
Lll
S
45'09'49"
E
130.98'
L12
N
742'58'
E
225.63•
CURIE TABLE
CURVE
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
TANGENT
CHORD BRG.
CHORD DIST.
Cl
8414'26"
25.14'
36.96'
22.73•
S 44'32'57" W
33.72'
C2
15'37'40"
2450.00'
668.25'
336.21'
S 79'08'35" W
666.18•
C3
90'00'00"
25.00'
39.27'
25.00•
N 41'57'25" E
35.36'
C4
48'11'23"
25.00'
21.03'
11.18'
N 2708'17" W
20.41'
C5
276'22'46"
65.00'
313.54'
-58.14'
S 86'57'25" W
86.67'
C6
48'11'23"
25.00'
21.03'
11.18'
S 21'03'06" W
20.41'
C7
90.00'00"
25.00'
39.27'
25.00•
S 48'02'35" E
35.36'
C8
9545'34"
25.00'
41.78'
27.65'
N 45'09'49" W
37.09'
C9
8414'26"
25.14'
36.96'
22.73'
N 44'32'57" E
33.72'
C10
48'11'23"
25.00'
21.03'
11.18'
S 68'56'54" E
20.41'
C11
276'22'46"
65.00'
313.54'
-58.14'
S 3'02'35" E
86.67'
C12
48'11'23"
25.00'
21.03'
11.18'
S 6751'43' W
20.41'
C13
9545'34"
25.00'
41.78'
27.65•
N 45'09'49" W
37.09'
C14
3550'26"
65.00'
40.66'
21.02
i
/ 16'x65' P.D.E.
10.
Lot 21 g'�ran / / `�1, Uf•
Lot 20
CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION
STATE OF TEXAS
park 95 sion
Dee"V.221,
S 88'14'27" E - 5844.90' - - • -
_ _to College Station Mon. j152 N 88'5725 E
"3 0.437 Acre H -OA Common Area ---�--�-- P.O.B. -I f
1.307 Acre H.O.A. Common Area \ _ - _ _ _ N Bel 3.39" E - 254.38'- - -
_ �- - � 55.89' 3
OSouthwest Line of 30 , Q M C
�T� Aquillo Southwest Pipeline ^ tJ 50 B.S.L. o i
ISI _ Esmt. (1843/1) o ,
/ ..
g Lott
Lot 7 m 1.251 Ac. / 1
C5
I
20' P.U.E. 3 1 20' P.U.E. / R66•
1181 L26� _jn �- --245.I NN
25'- _--
S 3'02'35" E 40.00' C�i -N 86'57 25 EBloc 7 Indian (X14i 1 u 41266)=°� LOf 1
1.121 Ac. nLot 5 I Lot 8 N H.OALs.E.JLot 4 50 B.S.L o
\ \ Y I U.E. - - . _ O.W.
ION H.OA.E. (11814/266) I 18 P. _ R
_..-..-..I+I -..- L-- -250.25'--
.. 10 H. E. (11814/2ss) - _ ) /II 86"5725" E - 250.00' - - -
_ 86'57.25" E -500.25'
\-_-----
- M&W vee o1rve
100' R.O.W. 24' pavement
Mg$O Verde OriVe N B6 57 25" E - 1112.38 -190.00•_ - - ----232.047 _ _ -� I Cl
100' R.O.W. (11814/266) • - - - _190.00 - --
N86"572oE-420.88 190.00'--- _ ��-- -- --.-._.- I
_ -194.07 _ - -
_200.36'--- _.- ]. wl ' ,
336.78' - --- - 16' P.U.E. -I. L.. -..-.._.. -I.1..-.. - I I d
- 10 H OAE
_-- _�L____ I Block301w Vi (a o I
itt it
16'x60' P.D.E.-.._..-..-.. I 1 1
-16' P.0.E. w I � m. o l I' �
M^ / I w ui I ;' I n g M Lot 5 I I 9 N I
-p Ia g M C-4
Lot 6 t o 1.435 Ac. O t
�M N is M a< N Lot 8 < c Lot 7 ,a n 1.110 Ac. N in I (1
NW o N 1.110 Ac. N o o "
ui t Lot 9 o m 1.110 Ac. N I I 3
2( Lot 10 a t 1.110 Ac. N N o 1 o in I C^ o O w
20' P.U.E. / 1.531 Ac. o I ut , w I I I , H.OALs.E. O ^ N
,� , 1 _..- - _.. YvSS
_ So'_
o3 iIo / � q4• - -� . �I 11 \_..-.. -.._--) __ -- --J S 86- _ _19 0.-00 '
1_0' 19H0.O.00• 16 P.U.E. - --211.43'
50' B.S.L '
o ---190.00'm 167.9Ha/ono COUrt -
-
------
182.02' / C10 70' R.O.W. 24' pavement
S.D. SMITH SURVEY. A-210
20' Drainage do Utility Easement (per plot) (221/295) -
86"58.4'i'E - 38.589• a _ ------------
J
N 86'58'44" E - 365.89'_
-155.00' 30• Aquilla Southwest
155.00- - - - Pipeline EsmL (1824/238)
6 10' P.U.E.
J.M. BARRERA SURVEY, A-69
m
./1.261 Ac.
\ I
I I
16' P.U.E. J W 16.725 Acres (Tract three)
t Mallard Development, Ltd.
_ - - 245.00•- - - - y� Smiling 8765; P.176
r -N 86'57'25" E' - -
20' P.U.E. I O
(( / Lot 4 g y
1.119 Ac.
H.OAL&E. 50• B.S L
�!8 - _ 10 H.OAE. - - I 370 �•
-_ _ - - -- J N 88'57.25" E -
250.00
> N 86'57'25" E - 620.00'
16' P.U.E.
I, Paul Clarke, Manager Smiling Mallard Management, LLC, the general
partner of Smiling Mallard Development, LTD., owner and developer of the land
shown on this plat, and designated herein as INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION,
PHASE laX, of Brazos County, Texas, and whose name is subscribed hereto,
hereby dedicate to the use of the public forever, all streets, alleys, parks,
greenways, infrastructure, easements, and public places thereon shown for the
purpose and consideration therein expressed. All such dedications shall be in
fee simple unless expressly provided otherwise.
Smiling Mallard Development, LTD.
By: Smiling Mallard Development Management, LLC.
Its; General Partner
By: Paul Clarke
Its: Manager
Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared
. known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me
that he executed the some for the purpose and consideration therein stated.
Given under my hand and seal on this _ day of
Notary Public, Brazos County, Texas
z L - S 8657.25 W-
-
c�J ON
4 \ ice G�7 1I -N .8_657'25" E- - . 9-37.24I'
_ 2 1.4. _-15 ._8276 Acro o o -190.00'--H.OA Common Area
and Conservation Stiffer 25" E- 153.09- 19000'----1 r -190.00'- - - . - . - . - -
N 8657
182.97' H.OAE. 16 P.U.E H.OA. L-s.E-.. 10 50' B.S.L.,/7
aT c
E
nI I I 13 I; 1 3
n l 50' B.S.L. , ; I o
in I i I� N I o c
-1 , I " O M N iV Lot 18 , : lel . I e
N W n $ M NLot 14 iv Lot 15 ,a o 1.321 Ac. q 1a: J d e E
I I I w N "r ,N N 099 A N 0 1.099 Ac. N h m I o I I a
N Lot 13 0 • o ai °a
w I
Lot 11 in
in Lot 12 o 0 1,099 Ac. N h o z = I Im
in l 1.646 Aa N o 1.116 Ac. o. N o i Z 1= I Iin
� I N c N I Zin
I I I I I I I
0 I 1 1 I Block 301 1 I I 10• P.U.E. J L----216.38'- - J 75.38' J
Z I I -I L---190.00'- _
1 I I I J L---190.00•--- -�
I 1 10' P.U.E. J L - - -190.00•- - - - - - -
I I -J �-----194.73'--- I I
L------ 90.48•- 1601.47 ------ Future
2 S 86'5725" W- I I i 1 1D' P.U.E.
III
Smiling Mallard Development Ltd. I I I
Lot 19 mainder of 1037.24 Acre Tract Two
ReI I
V4247 P.51 I I
till
I
�iyaalli[N\I�•]�1 j j:i•P11�
This subdivision plat was duly approved by the Commissioners Court of
Brazos County, Texas• as the Final Plat of such subdivision on the _ day
Of 20
Signed this the _ day of 20
County Judge
Brazos County, Texas
CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF BRAZOS
I, Karen McQueen. County Clerk, in and for said County, do hereby certify
that this plat together with its certificates of authentication was filed for
record in my office the day of . 20. in the
Official Records of Brazos County, Texas in Volume Page
Witness my hand and official Seal, at my office in Bryan, Texas.
County Clerk
Brazos County, Texas
CERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEER
I I 16.66 Acres (Tract 1 of Tract Two)
l I v I I III Smiling Mo/lard Development Ltd.
(!8765, P. 176
I, 'City Engineer of the
City of College Station, Texas, hereby certify that this Subdivision Plat
conforms to the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the City of
College Station.
City Engineer
City of College Station
CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
I, Chairman of the Planning and
Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, hereby certify that the
attached plat was duly approved by the Commission on the day of
. 20
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR AND/OR ENGINEER
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF BRAZOS
I, Kevin R. McClure, Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 5650, in
the State of Texas, hereby certify that this plat is true and correct and was
prepared from an actual survey of the property and that property markers
and monuments were placed under my supervision on the ground.
Kevin R. McClure, R.P.L.S. No. 5650
Being all that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the J. M. BARRERA SURVEY,
Abstract No. 69, Brazos County, Texas and being part of the 1037.24 acre Tract Two described in the
deed from Thousand Oaks Development Company Joint Venture to Smiling Mallard Development Ltd. recorded
in Volume 4247, Page 51, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas (O.R.B.C.), part of the 16.725
acre Tract Three described in the deed from Partners in Habitat Preservation, LLC to Smiling Mallard
Development Ltd. recorded in Volume 8765, Page 176 (O.R.B.C.) and part of the 16.66 acre Tract 1 of
Tract Two described in the deed from Partners in Habitat Preservation, LLC to Smiling Mallard Development
Ltd. recorded in Volume 8765, Page 176 (O.R.B.C.), and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING: at a found 1/2 -inch iron rod marking the northeast comer of Lot 7, Block 27, INDIAN LAKES
SUBDIVISION, PHASE XVI recorded in Volume 11814, Page 266 (O.R.B.C.), said iron rod also being in the
north line of the said 1037.24 acre Tract Two and the south line of DEER PARK SUBDIVISION recorded in
Volume 221, Page 295 of the Brazos County Deed Records (B.C.D.R.) and being at or near the common
line of the said J. M. BARRERA SURVEY, A-69 and the S.D. SMITH SURVEY, Abstract No. 210;
THENCE: N 86' 57' 25" E along the common line of the said 1037.24 acre tract and DEER PARK
SUBDIVISION for a distance of 254.36 feet to a found 1/2 -inch iron rod marking the northeast comer of
the said 1037.24 acre tract and the northwest comer of the said 16.725 acre tract;
THENCE: N 86' 58' 44" E along the common line of the said 16.725 acre tract and DEER PARK
SUBDIVISION for a distance of 365.89 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod set for comer,
THENCE: crossing through the said 1037.24 acre tract (4247/51), the said 16.725 acre tract (8765/176)
and the said 16.66 acre tract (8765/176) for the following six (6) calls:
1) S 03' 02' 35" E for a distance of 399.86 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod set for corner,
2) N 86' 57' 25" E for a distance of 370.00 feet to a 3/4 -inch iron pipe set for comer,
3) S 01' 45' 47" E for a distance of 100.02 feet to a 3/4 -inch iron pipe set for comer,
4) 36.96 feet in a counter -clockwise direction along the arc of a curve having a central angle of 84
14' 26", a radius of 25.14 feet, a tangent of 22.73 feet and a long chord bearing S 44' 32'
57" W at a distance of 33.72 feet to a 3/4 -inch iron pipe set for the Point of Tangency;
5) S 02' 42' 58" W for a distance of 556.47 feet to a 1/2 -Inch iron rod set for comer, and
6) S 86' 57' 25" W for a distance of 1808.47 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod set for corner in the east
line of Lot 19, Block 8, INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION, PHASE V as recorded in Volume 6055, Page 257
(O.R.B.C.);
THENCE: along the easterly lines of said INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION, PHASE V (6055/257) for the following
two (2) calls:
1) N 01' 25' 55" W for a distance of 237.83 feet to a found 1/2 -inch iron rod for comer, and
2) N 63' 25' 25" W for a distance of 501.97 feet to a found 1/2 -inch iron rod marking the north
comer of Lot 21, Block 8 of said PHASE V, said iron rod also being in the south right-of-way line
of Mesa Verde Drive [based on a 100 -foot width as recorded on the final plat of INDIAN LAKES
SUBDIVISION, PHASE XVI (11814/266)];
THENCE: along the southerly and easterly lines of said INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION. PHASE XVI (11814/266)
for the following five (5) calls:
1) 668.25 feet in a clockwise direction along the arc of a curve having a central angle of 15' 37' 40".
a radius of 2450.00 feet, a tangent of 336.21 feet and a long chord bearing N 79' 08' 35" E at a
distance of 666.18 feet to a found 3/4 -inch iron pipe for the Point of Tangency;
2) N 86' 57' 25" E for a distance of 420.88 feet to a 1/2 -Inch iron rod set for comer,
3) N 03' 02' 35" W for a distance of 100.00 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod set for comer,
4) N 86' 57' 25" E for a distance of 250.00 feet to a 1/2 -inch iron rod set for comer, and
5) N 03' 02' 35" W for a distance of 400.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 34.483
acres of land, more or less.
Vicinity Map
Scale:
1 100'
GENERAL NOTES,
1. The record bearings and actual measured distances to the found 1/2" iron rods
along the adjoining phases of Indian Lakes Subdivision were used as the basis
of the bearing system shown on this final plat.
2. According to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Brazos County, Texas and
Incorporated Areas, Map Number 48041CO350E, Map Revised May 16, 2012, this
property is not located in the Special Flood Hazard Area.
3. Building Line Setbacks:
Front = 50'
Side - 15'
Rear = 25-
4. All Common Areas and Conservation Buffers are owned and maintained by the
Homeowners' Association. See the covenants, conditions, and restrictions for
additional information.
5. Unless otherwise indicated, all distances shown along curves are arc distances.
6. Notes from the Brazos County Health Department:
a.) All lots served by an OSSF must comply with county and state regulations.
No OSSF may be installed on any lot without the issuance of an
"authorization to construct" issued by the Brazos County Health Department
under the provisions of the Private Sewage Facility Regulations adopted by
the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of
section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code. No OSSF drain field is to
encroach on the 100 -foot sanitary zone of private water wells or 150 feet
of public water wells.
b.) All Iota will be required to have asite/soil evaluation on file with the Brozoa
County Health Department before on-site sewage facility may be constructed.
c.) On-site sewage facility disposal areas shall not encroach the 100 foot or
the 150 foot sanitary zone of a private or public well, respectively.
7. Wellborn Special Utility District will provide water service for the subdivision.
8. There is a minimum 50' wide Drainage Buffer (25' on each side of the
centerline of all drainage ways). See the covenants, conditions, and restrictions
for additional information.
9. There is a 16' Public Utility Easement and a 10' Homeowners Association
Easement along the right-of-way frontage of all lots.
10. H.O.A. Easements along all streets run parallel to and adjacent to the public
utility easements shown hereon. H.O.A. Easement activities and/or infrastructure
is referenced in the covenants, conditions, and restrictions of the subdivision.
11. All proposed lots must be no more than 500 feet from a fire hydrant based on
the lay of hose along the street.
12. This property is located within the College Station Independent School District.
13. No construction or fencing shall impede, constrict, or block the flow of water in
any Private Drainage Easement. All Private Drainage Easements shall be
maintained by the Home Owners Association.
14. tots 1 and 4, Block 30 shall have driveway access to Catori Cove only. tots 5
thru 10 and 16. Block 30 shall have driveway access to Halona Court only.
15. Unless otherwise indicated 1/2" Iron Rods are set at all comers.
O - 1/2" Iron Rod Found
0 - 1/2" Iron Rod Set
O - 3/4" Iron Pipe Set
O - 3/4" Iron Pipe Found
o - PK Nail Control Monuments set in q of asphalt pavement for reference.
16. Abbreviation:
B.S.L. - Building Setback Line
H.OAC.A. - Homeowners Association Common Area
H.OAE. - Homeowners Association Easement
H.OALs.E. - Homeowners Association Landscape Easement
P.D.E. - Public Drainage Easement
Pr.D.E. - Private Drainage Easement
P.O.B. - Point of Beginning
P.U.E. - Public Utility Easement
Vw.Pr.D.E. - Variable Width Private Drainage Easement
FINAL PLAT
INDIAN LAKES
SUBDIVISION, PHASE' XIX
LOTS 1-16, BLOCKS 30
34.483 ACRES
J.M. BARRERA SURVEY, A-69
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
JANUARY, 2015
SCALE.- 1 " - 100'
Owner Surveyor
Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd. McClure k Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
3608 East 29th Street 1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103
Bryan, Texas 77802 College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 846-4384 (979) 693-3838 U■ `-'m
doo.P0—.w.
College Station, TX City Hal'
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, TX ]]840
Legislation Details (With Text)
File #:
15-0416 Version: 1 Name: 14015 Renee Lane- Rezoning
Type:
Rezoning Status: Agenda Ready
File created:
7/27/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda:
8/62015 Final action:
Title:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R
Rural to GS General Suburban for approximately 1.57 acres being the east % of Lot 10, Bald Prairie
Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in volume 321, page 571 ofthe deed records of Brazos
County, Texas, and being the same tract of land as described by a deed to Jeffery Joe Morgan
Recorded in volume 3956, Page 223 of the Official Public Records of College Station, Brazos County,
Texas. Generally located at 14015 Renee Lane, more generally located north of Barron Road and
between Renee Lane and Victoria Avenue. Case # REZ2015-000007 (M. Bombek) (Note: Final action
on this item is scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change)
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments:
Staff Report
Application
Rezoning Map
Date
Ver. Action By Action Result
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R
Rural to GS General Suburban for approximately 1.57 acres being the east''/2 of Lot 10, Bald Prairie
Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in volume 321, page 571 of the deed records of Brazos
County, Texas, and being the same tract of land as described by a deed to Jeffery Joe Morgan
Recorded in volume 3956, Page 223 of the Official Public Records of College Station, Brazos
County, Texas. Generally located at 14015 Renee Lane, more generally located north of Barron
Road and between Renee Lane and Victoria Avenue. Case # REZ2015-000007 (M. Bombek) (Note:
Final action on this item is scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to
change)
College Station, TX Page 1 oft Punted on 8/3/2015
powered by LegiqarTM
(*0Fq"
CITY OF COTd,FGF, STATTON
Home of Texas A&M University'
REZONING REQUEST
FOR
14015 Renee Lane
REZ2016-000007
REQUEST: R Rural to GS General Suburban
SCALE: 1.57 acres
LOCATION: Generally located north of Barron Road and between Renee Lane
and Victoria Avenue, being the east Y2 of Lot 10, Bald Prairie
Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in volume 321, page 571
of the deed records of Brazos County, Texas, and being the same
tract of land as described by a deed to Jeffery Joe Morgan
Recorded in volume 3956, Page 223 of the Official Public Records
of College Station, Brazos County, Texas.
APPLICANT:
:j:Lilal x0 9 LVA Fi101 /eCc3 4:A
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning & Zoning Commission
August 6, 2015
Michelle Kyllonen
Mark Bombek, Staff Planner
mbombek@cstx.gov
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
Page 1 of 5
� _ ���� s Q� .e.
o � � �
% � OO�po � A� � � + p.
-rt ��Fi %;_� a' � ar a,w 1
c+� _ � ��
//_
> �'LJ�i = r ��
� v `
i ' r '� �` \ yv��
N�� �� �m�e�m d y _ w�w.
�, �,m �, w
" � o - .a
m � = -- �
t ^� '�
��L
��-"`�,,� - w _-¢.p.,, Via.- _�.�,
._ _ .y ��� _ "�
'yg'gys
i@z�as
F ��SB�
$s gRs$
E�44 Y3�
4ap�9g$e2
1YY4 �5
'z Ef�s
w
:�
n
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 6, 2015
Advertised Council Hearing Date: August 27, 2015
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Westfield Village Homeowners Association Inc.
Victoria Court Homeowners Association
Edelweiss Ridge Homeowners Association
Property owner notices mailed:
Contacts in support:
Contacts in opposition:
Inquiry contacts:
ADJACENT LAND USES
18
None at the time of the report.
None at the time of the report.
None at the time of the report.
Direction
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning
Land Use
North
General Suburban
R Rural
Single-family home
South
General Suburban
R Rural
Single-family home
East Across Victoria
(
Avenue)
General Suburban
PDD Planned
Development District
Westfield Village
Subdivision
West (Across Renee
Lane)
General Suburban
R Rural
Single-family home
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation:
June 1995
Zoning:
A -O Agricultural Open upon annexation, renamed R Rural in 2013
Final Plat:
Bald Prairie Subdivision, 1973
Site development:
Vacant
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is designated as General
Suburban on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. This allows for
an intense level of development activities consisting of high-density single-family residential
lots with a minimum of 5,000 square feet in area. The proposed rezoning is consistent with
this designation.
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood: The current zoning of R Rural is compatible with
the immediately adjacent properties. The proposed rezoning of GS General Suburban will
allow for single-family residential development that is consistent with the development pattern
across Victoria Avenue and of the larger surrounding area.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 5
August 6, 2015
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district
that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The current zoning
designation of R Rural allows for large lot single-family and agricultural uses and is not
compatible with the future land use designation for this area that is significantly more intense.
A rezoning to GS General Suburban would be compatible with area development and meets
the property owner's intent to develop single-family housing.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district
applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The current zoning
does allow for single-family residential use but at a very low density of approximately one
dwelling unit for every three acres. This property is located along Victoria Avenue, a two-lane
major collector, and a rezoning is appropriate to allow for a higher density single-family
residential development.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property
could remain R Rural, but allowing GS General Suburban would make it more marketable
and similar with the surrounding neighborhoods.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for the proposed use: The subject property is located in the
College Station Utility District's water service area. There is an existing 8 -inch water line
along Renee Lane at the edge of the subject property. Development of the subdivision will
be required to meet the City's fire flow requirements. There are two 8 -inch sanitary sewer
lines adjacent to the property which will need to be extended according to BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. The subject tract is located in the Lick Creek drainage basin. Future
development of the tract will be required to meet the requirements of City Storm Water
Design Guidelines. The property is also located along Victoria Avenue, an existing two-lane
major collector.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Rezoning map
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 5
August 6, 2015
(*tl"1
CITY Or COLLIrGF STATION
Home of Texas A&M University'
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITTED:
TIME: ,
STAFF:
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION
GENERAL
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
$1,165 Rezoning Application Fee.
►� Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
L] Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for
the proposed request.
One (1) copy of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change;
c. Present zoning;
d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and
e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is
applicable).
A CAD (dxf/dwg) - model space State Plane NAD 83 or GIS (Shp) digital file (e-mailed to
pdsdigitalsubmittal&cstx.gov)
NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed
within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference lot % C-&] 1
NAME OF PROJECT _<y \\o\xy-
ADDRESS�. \Po 2C�s
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) r �i[,,te_ tNct EA:5 t ,%nR 4 � Cd
GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY, IF NOT PLATTED: 11� t[t f i� C3�_ d S 1 [': Yl
TOTALACREAGE `,, S"I Kc r!e
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name�`� �u(�lf�$ _yl E-mail k� CYk _0�-��
Street Address
City State l(��� �` �[ it; State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number I� -a , 15 T
PROPERJY OW
Name Y 111r,
Street Address
City CC) 11�
Phone Number
10/10
ca O
Page 1 of 3
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential) buyer, local cot ct, etc_);
Name m "1 E-mail i
Street Address Y do t2n q L
City 'f�;+Cft State -X'r )(n Zip Code % R L
Phone Number-, � � Fax Number )9_ -
This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated and recorded in Volume�\, Page 1
of the Brazos County Official Records.
Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Cr I
Present Use of Property . r�
Proposed Use of Property
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary.
2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the
Plan is incorrect.
I \)�_ k
kS
CCrnpr���:r�s�v�
3. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with
the character of the neighborhood?
P k' +r'gh�- kr� ,
10/10 Page 2 of 3
c�0�S
�� �� �V�,Y
2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the
Plan is incorrect.
I \)�_ k
kS
CCrnpr���:r�s�v�
3. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with
the character of the neighborhood?
P k' +r'gh�- kr� ,
10/10 Page 2 of 3
4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
S(i n 'p,
gym, iY
r
\\�Z) J-X�,e S
6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
1 ods Qn �-
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change_
'i,.Tn; I y
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf.
Oigture and title Date
10/10 Print Form Page 3 of 3
i
i I
i
i
II I
I
i Ii
I
i
i
i
I
I
I �
i
i
3A Bold Proi^'e j W subdivision /
J AI
LotAllen A 4 2� i /
Zoned R–Ru
of SubdtVisio
n
B0F I c Robinson
1.5 Ruro
1
Zoned R–
Scale: 1" = 30'
/11 Bold Proine Subd�bision
Lot Eugene So✓s
/ 3.82 Ruro1
re
Zoned R–
R1001
i
L_
VICINITY MAP
GENERAL SURVEYOR NOTES:
1. ORIGIN OF BEARING SYSTEM: Bearing System shown hereon is based on grid north as established by GPS observance.
2. According to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Brazos County, Texas and Incorporated Areas, Map Number
48041C0325E, Map Revised May 16, 2012, this property is not located in a Special Flood Hazard Area.
Legend
—o—o—
– Chain Link Fence
—x—x—
– Wire Fence
of
— Overhead Electrical Line
—T--T--
Underground Telephone Line (Approx. Location)
O
— 1/2" Iron Rod Set
O
– 1�2" Iron Rod Found
0
– 4x4" Concrete Monument
– Utility Sign
– Power PoleP.P.
F
– Guy Anchor (G.A.)
®
– Water Meter (W.M.)
x
– Light Pole (L.P.)
TP
– Telephone Pedestal
N
– Telephone Vault
RCP
–Reinforced Concrete Pipe
PUE
– Public Utility Easement
EE
– Electric Easement
1,57 ACRE TRACT
BE/NG ALL OF THE EAST HALF OF
LOT 10 BALD PRAIRIE SUBD/14S/ON
VOLUME 321, PAGE 571
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
JUNE 2015
SCALE 10 = 30'
Proposed Borrower. Suo=r,
Timothy and Michelle Kyllonen McClure do Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
2021 Youpon 1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103
College Station, Tx 77845 College Station, Texas 77845
979-229-3500 (979) 693-3838 U■ `-w
doo.P0—.w.
College Station, TX City Hal'
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, TX ]]840
Legislation Details (With Text)
File #:
15-0419 Version: 1 Name: MRC Senior Housing Project Rezoning
Type:
Rezoning Status: Agenda Ready
File created:
7/27/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda:
8/62015 Final action:
Title:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from GC
General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 12 acres being situated
in the Robert Stevenson Survey, Abstract No. 54, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, and being
part of Lot 3 - 15.81 acres, Barron Park Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Volume 939,
Page 209, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, said Lot 3 being described in the following
three deeds: to DWS Development, Inc., in Volume 3082, Page 297, and Volume 4735, Page 142,
both of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and to Mel Formby in Volume 4802, Page 89, of
the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, located on the northern boundary of Christ United
Methodist Church along State Highway 6 South. Case #REZ2015-000008 (J. Bullock) (Note: Final
action on this item is scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change)
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments:
Staff Report
Application
Rezoning Map
Concept Plan
Date
Ver. Action By Action Result
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from GC
General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 12 acres being situated
in the Robert Stevenson Survey, Abstract No. 54, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, and being
part of Lot 3 - 15.81 acres, Barron Park Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Volume 939,
Page 209, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, said Lot 3 being described in the
following three deeds. to DWS Development, Inc., in Volume 3082, Page 297, and Volume 4735,
Page 142, both of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and to Mel Formby in Volume 4802,
Page 89, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, located on the northern boundary of Christ
United Methodist Church along State Highway 6 South. Case #REZ2015-000008 (J. Bullock) (Note:
Final action on this item is scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to
change)
College Station, TX Page 1 oft Punted on 8/3/2015
powered by Legis[arTM
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University®
REZONING REQUEST
FOR
MRC Senior Housing Project
REZ2016-000008
REQUEST: GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District
SCALE: Approximately 12 acres
LOCATION: Located on the northern boundary of Christ United Methodist Church
along the east side of State Highway 6 South.
Being situated in the Robert Stevenson Survey, Abstract No. 54, College
Station, Brazos County, Texas, and being part of Lot 3 — 15.81 acres,
Barron Park Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Volume 939,
Page 209, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, said Lot 3
being described in the following three deeds: to DWS Development, Inc.,
in Volume 3082, Page 297, and Volume 4735, Page 142, both of the
Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and to Mel Formby in Volume
4802, Page 89, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas.
APPLICANT: Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP
PROJECT MANAGER: Jessica Bullock, Staff Planner
jbullock@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the PDD Planned Development
District zoning request and associated Concept Plan.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 8
August 6, 2015
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 8
August 6, 2015
N ;V
� mJ0
W
C
O
w
U
O
Z
F
LL
O
O
N
n.�� w O
0�O
U- O 0 W
U SI o
c� V
U�.1 �- -
<C
� yy
_ 'gym a(7 \fie Gt> +` _
0�m p Q
� CC
n
1
s�O a, / \ m' .. (7 C7 9 p
0
VO
cr CC
eWwaa e
'0 1 1 1 ❑
13ZZZOZDY
EX
N U - O ❑
O0 - W > N
Y�'U- W C❑a'
C
�^ W E v; -v -.x
N Q O W 9UW
0 9 T 0
E w U E > W N
W t c W— m 0 c
nZ��SU�d
n Q I l etl
nZU��Ud'd
v�oa
YKEON VU'Um
m
c
a
am ami
n2m
Nn
E E
a (U W
— LL
KWCU'fOpr
m
m W� O X0 m
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 8
August 6, 2015
L
m J
� �'� _
Ga°�m
� O
-
:gb � mQ
"p
gs e _Sd
�
s
Z -a
J
M
9 V'
OL 5
t
Q
n
�m
�s
�._ e
= t=.
n.�� w O
0�O
U- O 0 W
U SI o
c� V
U�.1 �- -
<C
� yy
_ 'gym a(7 \fie Gt> +` _
0�m p Q
� CC
n
1
s�O a, / \ m' .. (7 C7 9 p
0
VO
cr CC
eWwaa e
'0 1 1 1 ❑
13ZZZOZDY
EX
N U - O ❑
O0 - W > N
Y�'U- W C❑a'
C
�^ W E v; -v -.x
N Q O W 9UW
0 9 T 0
E w U E > W N
W t c W— m 0 c
nZ��SU�d
n Q I l etl
nZU��Ud'd
v�oa
YKEON VU'Um
m
c
a
am ami
n2m
Nn
E E
a (U W
— LL
KWCU'fOpr
m
m W� O X0 m
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 8
August 6, 2015
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 6, 2015
Advertised Council Hearing Date: August 27, 2015
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
None
Property owner notices mailed:
Two
Contacts in support:
None
Contacts in opposition:
None
Inquiry contacts:
None
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning
Land Use
North
Natural Areas- Protected
GC General
Vacant, owned by City of
Natural Areas - Reserved
Commercial
College Station
South
General Commercial
GC General
Christ United Methodist
Commercial
Church
East
Natural Areas — Reserved
R Rural
College Station Substation
Urban
West (Across State
Suburban Commercial
C-3 Light
Medical Clinic, Offices
Highway 6 South)
Commercial
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: October 1983
Zoning: A -O Agricultural Open upon annexation (1983)
C-1 General Commercial (1983)
Renamed GC General Commercial (2013)
Final Plat: December 1986
Site development: Undeveloped
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as
General Commercial and Natural Areas Reserved on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use and Character Map.
Land Use - General Commercial: intended for concentrations of commercial activities that
cater both to nearby residents and to the larger community or region. Generally, these
areas tend to be large in size and located near the intersection of two regionally significant
roads (arterials and freeways). It is preferred that in such areas development be
concentrated in nodes rather than spread out in strips.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 8
August 6, 2015
Land Use — Natural Areas Reserved: intended for areas that represent a constraint to
development and that should be preserved for their natural function or for open space
qualities. These areas include floodplains and riparian buffers, as well as recreation
facilities.
The proposed PDD Planned Development District zoning uses a base zoning district of MF
Multi -Family to allow for a development that will provide senior independent living and
assisted living to elderly/aging residents of College Station.
The subject property is also located within the Medical District Master Plan which aims to
support the City's goal of designating a special district that will establish identity, promote
continuity, and invite significant new investment to fulfill the demand for medical and health
care related uses in the emerging medical district and in the City of College Station. The
plan designates the subject property as Commercial which calls for more professional
office space and services. Uses include Retail, Personal Service, Medical Related, and
Hotels.
The Comprehensive Plan Thoroughfare Plan shows future Lakeway Drive aligned with the
rear of this property. Across Lakeway Drive the plan calls for Mixed Urban Residential.
This designation calls for a neighborhood that contains a variety of residential types and
sizes. Uses include Townhome, Live -Work, Apartment, Independent Living, and Assisted
Living. To the north of the site the Medical District Plan calls for Parks, Open Space, and
Natural Greenways. Without frontage to State Highway 6, the subject property has the
opportunity to provide residential options in the Medical District.
Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood: Christ United Methodist Church is located to
the south of this property and is zoned GC General Commercial. To the east is the
College Station Substation zoned R Rural. To the north is vacant land zoned R Rural and
owned by the City of College Station. The subject property is currently zoned GC General
Commercial. The proposed PDD for senior independent and assisted living along with
associated medical uses compatible with the character and development of the
surrounding area.
Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed
PDD uses a base zoning district of MF Multi -Family. Without frontage to State Highway 6
and with proximity to Christ United Methodist Church, future hike and bike trails, and medical
facilities, residential uses may be suitable for this property. MF Multi -family also allows for
the opportunity for non-residential uses when incorporated into residential structures.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
subject property is currently zoned GC General Commercial. The property may be suitable
for this zoning district, but until the construction of Lakeway Drive and further development
with the Medical District area, commercial is likely more suitable for the front 3.5 acres along
State Highway 6 South.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: According
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 8
August 6, 2015
to the applicant, senior housing/assisted living developments are highly desirable in the
College Station marketplace. With proximity to the hospital, future hike and bike trails, and
the Medical District, senior housing/assisted living may be marketable.
Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water Service will be provided by City of
College Station via existing 18 -inch water main along State Highway 6 South. There is an 8 -
inch sanitary sewer line available along State Highway 6 South that ultimately ties into the lift
station between Barron Road and Eagle Ave. There is currently limited capacity in the lift
station, and the proposed number of dwelling units appear to exceed the current capacity.
Lift station improvements by the developer will be required to serve the proposed dwelling
units. The lot is in the Lick Creek drainage basin. Detention is required with this
development. When replatting, the lot will be required to break block length by connecting a
public street or public way from State Highway 6 South to the future Lakeway Drive.
Drainage and other public infrastructure required with the site shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. Existing infrastructure,
except for sanitary sewer, appears to currently have capacity to adequately serve the
proposed use.
REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN
The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building and
parking areas as well as other site related features. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may
also request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that
those variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed
development. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as
the basis for reviewing PDD Concept Plans:
1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony
with the character of the surrounding area;
2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with
the intent and purpose of this Section;
3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not
adversely affect adjacent development;
4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public
street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners
association;
5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not
limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities;
6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle,
or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated
by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing
zoning and land uses in the area.
General: The proposed Concept Plan includes units for senior independent living, assisted
living, memory care, and skilled nursing in different phases. All structures will be a maximum of
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 of 8
August 6, 2015
4 -stories tall and may have architectural elements above 4 -stories that could be as tall as 70 feel
above ground level (e.g., cupolas). If a trail system is provided around the pond common area it
will be privately owned and maintained. Certain structures will incorporate covered parking for
residents at grade/first floor level. A Public Way will be provided along the shared property line
with Christ United Methodist Church from State Highway 6 to the future Lakeway Drive.
Modifications Requested: MF Multi -Family is proposed as the base zoning district with the
following modifications. All other standards not expressly requested and approved will meet MF
Multi -Family standards:
• Density: The applicant requests to reduce the minimum density requirement from 12
dwelling units per acre to 9 dwelling units per acre.
• Parking: The applicant requests to reduce the number of parking spaces for multi -family
units from 1.5 per bedroom for 1 and 2 bedroom units to 1 parking space per bedroom.
Additional Parking will be provided for other uses on-site at the ratios required as per the
Unified Development Ordinance.
Community Benefits: The applicant offers the following as community benefits:
• The unique product of this development is to meet the needs of the growing retiree
population and provide a residential option with on-site care facilities.
• The development will provide a direct access to the new hike and bike trails for its residents
and other consumers to utilize.
• A location convenient to hospitals and medical facilities which lessens the burden on the
City's transportation system.
• The proximity of the project to Christ United Methodist Church is advantageous as it provides
access to the church to allow participation in the Church's programming within walking
distance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the PDD Planned Development District zoning request and
associated Concept Plan.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Rezoning Map
3. Concept Plan
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 7 of 8
August 6, 2015
(*Orq"
CITY OP COLLFGC STATION
Home ofTexasA&M University'
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITTED:
TIME:
STAFF:
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION
PLANNED DISTRICTS
(Check one) M ($1,165) Planned Development District (PDD)
❑ ($1,165) Planned Mixed -Used Development (P -MUD)
❑ ($315) Modification to Existing PDD or P -MUD Amendment - Planning & Zoning Commission and
City Council Review
Please use Concept Plan Minor Amendment Application for minor amendments as per Section JA J of the UDO.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
Q $315 - 1,165 Rezoning Application Fee.
Fx] Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
I, may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
/ Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the
(((^^^ proposed request. t;;AjO Suk�iYtl'f W►+ `,I K p)ar11
❑X One (1) copy of a fully dimensioned Rezoning Map on 24"x36" paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change;
c. Present zoning;
d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and
e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
0 Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is
applicable).
0 A CAD (dxf/dwg) - model space State Plane NAD 83 or GIS (Shp) digital file (e-mailed to
PDSDigitalSu bmittal@cstx. gov).
0 Six (6) copies of the Concept Plan on 24'x36" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the LIDO.
0 One (1) copy of the Concept Plan on 8.5x11" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO.
0 The attached Concept Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
checked off.
NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed
within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference December 17, 2014
NAME OF PROJECT College Station Senior Housing Project
ADDRESS State Highway 6
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision)
Barron Park, Lot 3
GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY IF NOT PLATTED:
Generally the back 12.3 acres out of the 15.81 acres better known as Lot 3 of the Barron Park Subdivision
TOTAL ACREAGE 12.3 acres
Revised 4/14 Pagel of 7
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Mitchell & Morgan, LLP C/O Veronica Morgan E-mail v@mitchellandmorgan.com
Street Address 3204 Earl Rudder Freeway South
City College Station
Phone Number 979-260-6963
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name DWS Development, Inc C/O David Scarmardo
Street Address P.O. Box 4508
City Bryan
Phone Number 979-412-1386
State Texas
Zip Code 77802
Fax Number 979-260-3564
State Texas
Fax Number
E-mail david@dwsdevelopmentcom
Zip Code 77805
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc,):
Name Aldersgate Trust C/O Ron Jennette E-mail rjennette@mrcaff.org
Street Address 1440 Lake Front Circle, Suite 110
City The Woodlands
Phone Number 281-210-0135
This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated
of the Brazos County Official Records.
Existing Zoning General Commercial (GC)
Present Use of Property Vacant- Undeveloped
State Texas
Zip Code 77380
Fax Number 281-292-6360
08/20/2002 and recorded in Volume 4802 , Page 089
Proposed Zoning Planned Development District (PDD)
Proposed Use of Property Senior Housing, Assisted Living, Memory Care and potentially skilled nursing.
Proposed Use(s) of Property for PDD, if applicable:
Senior Housing, Assisted Living, Memory Care and potentially skilled nursing.
P -MUD uses are prescribed in Section 6.2.C. Use Table of the Unified Development Ordinance.
If P -MUD:
Approximate percentage of residential land uses: Not Applicable
Approximate percentage of non-residential land uses: Not Applicable
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary.
With each passing year, College Station has more and more elderly citizens and baby boomers that are getting
older in age that desire to downsize their living. There is a serious lack of facilities to accommodate these citizens
in College Station. The majority of these residents move to similar facilities in Bryan. We are proposing to build a
unique product that is significantly less dense than allowed in the MF Zoning District. This project is designed for
active seniors as well as seniors in need of memory care and/or living assistance. This request is for a PDD Zoning
District based upon the MF Zoning District with a few meritorious modifications.
Revised 4/14 Page 2 of 7
2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the
Plan is incorrect.
s, it is partially in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The approved Comprehensive Plan shows this area
a General Commercial Use which allows extended care facility/convalescent/nursing home as a permitted use by
Jt- However, our product is a hybrid that has not yet been contemplated in the UDO. We are also placing active
liars on the property in a facility similar to that of multi -family. In the senior care facility industry, this product
)ws aging -in-place.
3. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with
the character of the neighborhood?
The surrounding properties consist of Christ United Methodist Church to the east, undeveloped commercial land to
the south along the SH6 Frontage road, undevelopable parkland to the west and vacant rural land next to an
electrical substation to the north. This zoning change will allow for a unique residential product that will be
compatible with all of the surrounding properties.
4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
senior housing /assisted living use is suitable for this property. We are asking fora PDD zoning so that we
I senior housing/ assisted living facilities with a density less than the minimum 12 dwelling units per acre
iced for the MF- Multi -Family zoning district.
5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
current zoning district is GC - General Commercial. The property may be suitable for this zoning district,
over, we believe that commercial is more realistic and viable for the front 3.5 acres of the entire 15.81 acre tract
has direct access to the State Highway 6 frontage road. We are asking for a PDD zoning so that we can build
or housing / assisted living facilities with a density less than the minimum 12 dwelling units per acre that is
ired for the MF - Multi -Family zoning district on the back 12.31 acres of the tract.
6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
Housing /Assisted Living facilities are highly desirable in the College Station marketplace.
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change.
unique placement of this property, which is largely surrounded by undevelopable or low intensity uses and
in proximity to several medical facilities lends itself to an ideal location for this low density senior housing
Revised 4/14 Page 3 of 7
8. State the purpose and intent of the proposed development.
2.
e purpose of the development is to provide a senior housing /assisted living option to the elderly/aging residents
College Station.
CONCEPT PLAN SUPPORTING INFORMATION
What is the range of future building heights?
The building height will not exceed the current standards provided in the MF -Multi -Family Zoning District.
-roviae a general siaiemeni regaraing me proposes arainage.
As much as possible, the flows from the site and existing flows from Christ United Methodist Church to the south
shall be collected and conveyed to the proposed retention pond. Some areas along the north side of the site shall
be released undetained along the northern property line in a fashion similar, but at a lesser rate, to the existing
condition. Flows from the proposed retention pond shall be conveyed to the existing channel at the northern
propertyline. An environmental study has been performed which identify some jurisdictional areas. We will comply
with all USACE requirements with regard to these jurisdictional areas. Flows from the commercial sites along State
Highway 6 shall be conveyed in a pipe in an easement along the northern property line to the existing channel.
Detention for the commercial sites shall be provide on the commercial sites.
3. List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought.
see the attached Bulk Variance Letter.
4. If variations are sought, please provide a list of community benefits and/or innovative design concepts to justify the
request.
see the attached Bulk Variance Letter.
Revised 4/14 Page 4 of 7
5. Explain how the concept plan proposal will constitute and environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony
with the character of the surrounding area.
proposed concept plan as an active senior and assisted living facility in proximity to the medical district will
ide an environment of sustained stability to existing development and the surrounding properties. The
Vopment will be sensitive to the existing and future land uses, transportation activities, and the natural
6. Explain how the proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
proposed use conforms with the intent of the landuse designation as it is a use that will cater to the larger
imunity or region. The proposed use is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan's goals to maintain business
idors with designated commercial development, as well as being sensitive to the surrounding natural features of
Spring Creek district.
7. Explain how the concept plan proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not
13
aneci
The proposed use of the property as an active senior and assisted living facility is compatible with the abutting
properties as it is both a low intensity commercial use and low density multi -family residential use. As a residential
use, this development will provide direct access for its residents to utilize the adjacent hike and bike trails and
medical facilities in the area. The proposed development will be an asset to the surrounding properties and
State how dwelling units shall have access to a public street if they do not front on a public street.
The dwelling units will front on a public way and have a common parking area throughout the development.
Driveways will be limited to two onto the future public way and one onto the future extension of Lakeway Drive.
g, State how the development has provided adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to: parks, schools,
and other public facilities.
The development will be paying parkland dedication fees.
Revised 4114 Page 5 of 7
10, Explain how the concept plan proposal will not be detrimental to the public health. safety nr wale,., nr r„
utuuuus w properties or improvements in the vicinity.
As we are requesting to provide a significantly decreased density than that which is required to be built with the MF
- Mutti-Family zoning, the project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially
inJurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
11, Explain how the concept plat! proposal will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or
pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably eXpected to be generated by tha nrnhncarr nen ,.,,r
a tui usee i easoname anuciparea to me area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area.
As We are requesting to provide a significantly decreased density than that which is required to be built with the MF
- Multi-Fam/ly zoning, we will not be adversely affecting the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or
pedestrian circulation in the vicinity.
Please note that a "complete site plan" must be submitted to Planning & Development services for a formal review after
the "concept plan" has been approved by the City Council prior to the Issuance of a building permit - except for single-
family development.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct and complete. iF THIS APPLICATION IS FiLED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPi=RTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a corppany, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf.
v
Sig ature "tile Date
Revised 4114 Page 6 of 7
MORGAN
Jessica Bullock
Staff Planner
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842
July 27, 2015
Re: MRC SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT AT STATE HIGHWAY 6 NEXT TO CHRIST UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH (REZ-PDD)
Dear Jessica,
As discussed we are requesting the following bulk variances.
Listed below are the bulk variances that we are seeking for the MRC Senior Housing
Project:
Understanding that we must choose a base zoning district for the residential development upon
which we base all variance requests, we have chosen MF — Multi -Family as our base district.
Residential Area Bulk Variance Requests:
1. The rezoning be conditional based on the sale of the property to Aldersgate Trust.
2. Allow for a reduced minimum density than what is required in MF — Multi -Family.
This district requires a minimum density of 12 du/ac. The proposed density of the finished
development will include approximately 144 - 168 dwelling units or 11.7 - 13.6 du/ac.
Development standards require that each phase of a phased development be able to
support themselves and provide all minimum development requirements and meet
development standards independently. However, the proposed phasing of this development
will not allow both phases to support this minimum density. We are asking for a variance to
approximately 9 du/ac.
3. Parking
Minimum parking requirements for MF — Multi -Family require 1.5 parking spaces per
bedroom in one and two bedroom dwelling units. The product we are proposing will be
leased as a unit to one family rather than by the bedroom to several unrelated residents.
These units will consist of eight 1 -bedroom units and 64 2 -bedroom units, totaling 136
bedrooms. Based on the nature of this development and the population for which it will
serve, we are asking for a variance from 1.5 to 1.0 parking spaces per bedroom. It is unlikely
that the families that occupy these units will require more than one parking space, and since
the 2 -bedroom units consist of a large majority of the development, we believe that
adequate parking will be provided for the residents and their visitors.
Additional parking will be provided for other uses on-site at the required ratio as per the
UDO.
3204 EARL RUDDER FWY. S. • COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 • 979,260.6963 • ` 979.260.3564
CIVIL ENGINEERING HYDRAULICS HYDROLOGY UTILITIES STREETS SITE PLANS SUBDIVISIONS
Inm@"11[E 14 nd'I"T"I uml • air,vw mnehellan,lmorgan mm
As stated in the UDO, the purpose of the Planned Development district is to promote and
encourage innovative development that is sensitive to surrounding land uses and to the natural
environment. A PDD may be used to permit new or innovative concepts in land utilization not
permitted by other zoning districts. Finally, the PD District allows development to vary from
certain development standards so long as there are community benefits which outweigh the
requested modifications. We believe that this project offers a unique product and its community
benefits certainly outweigh modifications being requested. These community benefits are as
follows:
The unique product of this development to meet the needs of the growing retiree
population and provide a residential option with on-site care facilities.
The development will provide a direct access to the new hike and bike trails for its
residents and other consumers to utilize.
A location convenient to hospitals and medical facilities which lessens the burden on the
City's transportation system.
The proximately of the project to Christ United Methodist Church is advantageous as it
provides access to the church to allow participation in the church's programming and is
within walking distance.
Thank you very much. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Veronica J.18?'Mor666, PE, CFM
Managing Partnere„
Cc: File
Ownership Supplemental Sheet
Mel Formby
P.O. Box 4508
Bryan, T_ X 77805
Email:
Phone:
Signature Date
Awl Mitchell &Morgan Mail MY montever
GmaiKerry Pillow <kerry@mlrchellandmorgan four
acanni
FW: trusteees
1 message
Matthew Currie <mcurrie@mraR.mg> Thu, May 14, 2015 at A]8 PM
To: Veronica Morgan<v@miichellantlmorgan. four Kerry Pillow <kerry@miichellandmorgan. four "Brian Schiff
(bschiR]@gmail. comp <bschiR]@gmail. four Ron Jennette<pennette@mraff mg>
From'. Gall Sal [madid GailBarAlla@chriA- done org]
Sant Friday, April 10, 20153'. 11 PM
To Matthew Currie
Subject tuslaaas
Matthew,
m pleased to let you know the Christ UMC Board of Trustees has approved the following motion:
Christ UMC Board of Trustees has agreed to grant up to AB feet of right of way to MRC provided any
parking lost Is restored at MRC expense.
In addition they included the following
-
The trustees want to request that any signs or lights that are removed due to construction would be relocated at
the expense of the MRC
The trustees also understand a deceleration lane will be installed at the west corner of Christ UMC property.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need Ntlber Information.
I am happy to helpl
Gail
Mason ail rose connrmavuwuFazarsrmweawielal mmu+4—rueprowear dialiassao:ean®¢'z�imKiassao:ean®m
Rezone
12.31 acres
Part of Lot 3 - Barron Park Subdivision
Robert Stevenson Survey, A-54
College Station, Brazos County, Texas
Field notes of a 12.31 acre tract or parcel of land, lying and being situated in the Robert Stevenson Survey, Abstract No. 54, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, and being part of Lot 3 - 15.81 acres,
Barron Park Subdivision, according to the plat recorded in Volume 939, Page 209, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, said Lot 3 being described in the following three deeds: to DWS Development,
Inc., in Volume 3082, Page 297, and Volume 4735, Page 142, both of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and to Mel Formby in Volume 4802, Page 89, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas,
and said 12.31 acre tract being mor-- particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a '/2" iron rod and cap set at the common corner between the beforementioned Lot 3 - 15.81 acres, and Lot 1 - 15.00 acres, of the beforementioned Barron Park Subdivision, and in the
southwest line cf a 100.64 acre tract described in the deed to The City of College Station, Texas, recorded in Volume 6927, Page 226, c)f the Official Recorcds of Brazos County„ Texas;
THENCE S 440 21' 19" W along the common line between the beforementioned Lot 3, and the following two lots: the beforementioned Lot 1 and Lot 2 - 9.82 acres of the beforementioned Barron Park
Subdivision, at a distance of 690.91feet pass the common corner between Lots 1 and 2, continue on for a total dista--nce of 1002.10 feett to an "X" set in con Crete;
THENCE N 440 34' 17" W parallel to the northeast right-of-way line of State Highway No. 6 for a distance of 536.30 feet to a'/2" iron rod and cap set in the common line between the beforementioned Lot 3,
and a 46.609 acre tract described it the deed to The Ciy of College Statior, Texas, recorded in Volume 3310, Page; 321, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas;
THENCE N 440 40' 14" E along the common line between the beforementioned Lot 3, and the beforementioned 46.609 acre tract, for a distance of 1009.63 feet to a '/2" iron rod and cap set at the common
corner between the said Lot 3 and the 46.609 acre tract and in the southwest line of the beforementioned 100.64 acre tract;
THENCE along the common line between the beforementioned Lot 3, and the beforementioned 100.64 acre tract, adjacent to an up and down fence, as follows:
S 430 29' 51" E for a distance of 463.87 feet ti a'/2" iron rod and crap set,
S 440 20' 19" E for a distance of 30.51 feet from which a twin 12" Dost oak tree bears PN 61 ° 00' E - 1.9 feet,
S 460 27'41" E for a distance of 36.61 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 12.31 acres of land, more or less.
Surveyed: May, 2015
By:
S. M. Kling
R.P.L.S. No. 2003
I
I
I
I II
I
I
� 1
I , Scale:
r 1 inch = 100 feet
ZONED: R - RURAL
I I
THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
10' UTILITY EASEMENT VOL. 3310 PG. 321 /
VOL. 939 PG 209 UNPLATTED
I
I �
1
N 41'28'58" E 1293.52'
r 17 — — —N 471;26'W0 --E 283.89' — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — N 41728 58" E 1009.83' — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1
I
�1 1
1 I II 0 m
I I I Cr>—
11 ID" :-i
1 I I1
"JZ 0
I mpm0
I o• x0
ZONED:
I I N VDi m
GC GENERAL
COMMERCIAL Development, Inc. 11 °' m
COMMERCIAL p
8c Mel Formby I
n1 i Vol. 4802 Pg. 89 Ila
3 1 I gG) i Inc
. I Q N Im
IV
w I
1 I I 1 zo
zlI� I lv p
I I BARRON PARK SUBDIVISION
LOT 3, BLOCK 1 -i I
1 I oo
if I
25' BUILDING LINE & I 1 D
1 I UTILITY EASEMENT 1 1 r-
1 I VOL. 1005 PG 790
20' UTILITY EASEMENT
I I VOL. 939 PG 209
1 I 47'31'3¢" E
1 I 30.51
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1817" E
-
I
CHRIST UNITED III CHRIST UNITED JW
METHODIST CHURCH III METHODIST CHURCH
Vol. 2734, PG. 156 I I Vol. 3694 Pg 243
I III II
I III II
ZONED: III
I I COMMERCIAL GC GENERALI I GCGENERAL
II I I I COMMERCIAL
I III
I III I
I I III I
I III li
I III I
I I III I
I III
I I III `
I I III \
EXISTING ZONING
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
I
I
I
Scale:
I r 1 inch = 100 feet
ZONED: R - RURALI I
THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
10' UTILITY EASEMENT VOL. 3310 PG. 321
VOL. 939 PG 209 UNPLATTED /
N 41'28'58" E 1293.52'
— —— — — — — —� — — — — — — — —
N 41'28=58" E 283.89' 41' 1009.83' —
40
I I
< z
1 I oCnrn
C in
Z � �
1 �N0
I � J70
lyl mpm0
o• x0
ZONED: N W r--
I GC GENERAL DWS Development, Inc.NED: PDD PLANNED I °' m
0 COMMERCIAL p mennc.
� I I DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
�� �Mel Formby
� I 8c y
� _ {r l I Vol. 4802 Pg. 89 z I 1
4
.11
<
0 I _ m N
BARRON PARK SUBDIVISION c' Z
cn > Z I A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1 _ o
m BARRON PARK SUBDIVISION m m
I I A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1
>
I �
I�
25' BUILDING LINE & D
I UTILITY EASEMENT r-
I I
VOL. 1005 PG 790
I 0' LI S ENT
47'31'3" E
30.51
49L 38'57" E
41' _ N 10 03—E 20.92-38.61'
—--—— — — — — — i
CHRIST UNITED I I CHRIST UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH I I METHODIST CHURCH
Vol. 2734, PG. 156 I I Vol. 3694 Pg 243
I III I
III II
I I
ZONED: I I ZONED:
GC GENERAL I I GC GENERAL I
COMMERCIAL I I COMMERCIAL I
( I I I
( I III I
I I I I
I III II
I I I I
I I I I
I III \
II III \
PROPOSED ZONING
MITCHELL
OR
T.979.260.6963
F.979.260.3564
TX. FIRM # F-1443
3204 EARL RUDDER
FWY S
COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840
PLAN & DESIGN SPECIALISTS IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING * HYDRAULICS
HYDROLOGY * UTILITIES * STREETS
SITE PLANS * SUBDIVISIONS
www.mitchellandmorgan.com
w
C 0 o a
0.0 n
� m
,0
.5-c _ `0,0
d°�°�
E U 0
s==gaam
U y O
Cv 0 °a 'Z
— U
D ° •E
c 0
M °�° m
1
0�Y
Tm
M
JN
C
� •— 3 U
N 0 N
J-
00(-)
Z
O
P
LL-
N
Q
Q
Q-
-
a)
Q)
v
V
w
O
V
U7
C
0
Q)
Of
QL
LQJ
O
�
O
r
O w'1
I V
Z
W
' J
Q)
e
N�
5) A portion of this property is located within a Zone AE Special
1
Flood Hazard Area. Where portions of the floodplain are filled, a
Proposed Lakeway Drive Extension
No Adverse Impact drainage analysis and certification must be
1 tr11
1 00'wide Right of Way
downstream properties. 1 t 1
i
• iG l
m
6) As much as possible, the flows from the site and existing flows
11t
from Christ United Methodist Church to the south shall be j i+
l Il
collected and conveyed to the proposed retention pond. Some
liltl
areas along the north side of the site shall be released
.11t)l
un -detained along the northern property line in a fashion similar,
Notes:
but at a lesser rate, to the existing condition. Plows from the A�
Ilijl
proposed retention pond shall be conveyed to the existing
1) All structures will be a maximum of 4 -stories tall and may have
ry
performed which identify some Jurisdictional areas. We will �•
1 1111
comply with all USACE requirements with regard to these •
architectural elements above 4 -stories that could be as tall as
jurisdictional areas. Flows from the commercial sites along Sate z}2
Highway 6 shall be conveyed in a pipe in an easement along the
Il
4 11,1 I
tf
70 -feet above ground level (i,e. cupolas, etc.)
`bB � I I
commercial sites shall be provided on the commercial sites. 1
1'
Wooded
n
A I
t112
2) If a trail system is provided around the pond common area it will
be privately owned and maintained.
3) Certain structures will incorporate covered parking for residents at
the grade / first floor level.
4) The green space / common area / floodplain / detention area shall
i
i
be privately maintained.
li
1
5) A portion of this property is located within a Zone AE Special
1
Flood Hazard Area. Where portions of the floodplain are filled, a
1 Ir
No Adverse Impact drainage analysis and certification must be
1 tr11
provided certifying that the fill will not cause flooding to upstream / •
downstream properties. 1 t 1
i
• iG l
m
6) As much as possible, the flows from the site and existing flows
11t
from Christ United Methodist Church to the south shall be j i+
l Il
collected and conveyed to the proposed retention pond. Some
liltl
areas along the north side of the site shall be released
.11t)l
un -detained along the northern property line in a fashion similar,
. � till
1
but at a lesser rate, to the existing condition. Plows from the A�
Ilijl
proposed retention pond shall be conveyed to the existing
channel at the northern property line. An environmental study has
been
performed which identify some Jurisdictional areas. We will �•
1 1111
comply with all USACE requirements with regard to these •
I Ilt,�l
jurisdictional areas. Flows from the commercial sites along Sate z}2
Highway 6 shall be conveyed in a pipe in an easement along the
Il
4 11,1 I
tf
northern property line to the existing channel. Detention for the
`bB � I I
commercial sites shall be provided on the commercial sites. 1
1'
Wooded
area �r
't
er mo.
b
�+
+ 2
e
1
1 Ir
'
1 tr11
4
iit1V
�
11t
l Il
e
liltl
�.
.11t)l
•
•
. � till
1
. g,
Ilijl
•�
1 1111
.,'
I Ilt,�l
s�
moa
4 11,1 I
tf
`bB � I I
A I
t112
TTT"' s s 7
.r
T war 11
Power
Substation
Proposed Lakewayy Drive Extension
p
1 00'wide Right of Way
�1�._11
••— 111 ' ��, Il 1
I
1
I
I 1
I I
ure,_y as �I 1
F,. t
40' P.AE.
R !
' I
I 1
I
%t
I
I � 1a'
I N
Retention Pond
I
I
j
) I
I°
i
I I.
Out Parcel
I c I
I ail
° I
I I
I I
d I
I ° I
- - ° 25' 80ding Linea Udrdy Ears dant
State Highway 6 Frontage Road
Texas State Highway No. 6
,IT
►v:;.'7
METHODIST
RETIREMENT
COMMUNITIES
1440 Lake Front Circle suite 110
The Woodlands, TX 77380
Tel: (281) 210-0135
CONCEPT PLAN
JUNE 171 2015
0 10' I20' 40' 80' 160'
I a
SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
Applicant: Mitchell & Morgan, LLP
3204 Earl Rudder Freeway South
College Station, Texas 77845
979-260-6963
Property Address: State Highway 6
Total Site Area: 12.31 Acres
SENIOR LIVING HEALTH CARE,
COMMONS & LIVING UNITS
PARKING, DRIVE AISLE
& PRIVATE DRIVE AREAS
NORTH
no architects
250 Valleybrook Drive
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17601
Tel: (717) 560-9501
RLPS Project No. 2014121
goo.,g—.—
College Station, TX City Hal'
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, TX ]]840
Legislation Details (With Text)
File #:
15-0421 Version: 1 Name: Embassy Suites PDD
Type:
Rezoning Status: Agenda Ready
File created:
7/27/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda:
8/62015 Final action:
Title:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," ofthe Code of
Ordinances ofthe City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries for
approximately 2.429 acres from O Office and GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development
District for a hotel development, being located in the Richard Carter Survey, Abstract No. 8, College
Station, Brazos County, Texas. Said tract being all of Lot 1, Black Eyed Pea Addition, according to
the plat recorded in Volume 1233, Page 531 ofthe Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and all
of Lots 3-11 and a portion of Lot 2, Block "A", College Heights, according to the plat recorded in
Volume 124, Page 259 ofthe Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas; being located at 201 University
Drive East, 403, 405, 409 Jane Street, and 400, 402, 406 A&B, 408 Eisenhower Street, and being
more generally located north of University Drive East between Jane Street and Eisenhower Street.
Case #REZ2015-000010 (J.Prochazka) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the August
27, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change.)
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments: Staff Report
Application
Modifications Request Letter
Rezoning Map
Concept Plan
Date Ver. Action By Action Result
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries for
approximately 2.429 acres from O Office and GC General Commercial to PDD Planned Development
District for a hotel development, being located in the Richard Carter Survey, Abstract No. 8, College
Station, Brazos County, Texas. Said tract being all of Lot 1, Black Eyed Pea Addition, according to
the plat recorded in Volume 1233, Page 531 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and all
of Lots 3-11 and a portion of Lot 2, Block "A", College Heights, according to the plat recorded in
Volume 124, Page 259 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, being located at 201
University Drive East, 403, 405, 409 Jane Street, and 400, 402, 406 A&B, 408 Eisenhower Street,
and being more generally located north of University Drive East between Jane Street and
Eisenhower Street. Case #REZ2015-000010 (J.Prochazka) (Note: Final action on this item is
scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change.)
College Station, TX Page 1 oft Punted on 8/3/2015
powered by Legis[arTM
(*0rq"
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University®
REZONING REQUEST
for
Embassy Suites
REZ2015-000010
REQUEST:
O Office and GC General Commercial to
PDD Planned Development District for a hotel development
SCALE:
2.429 acres
LOCATION:
201 University Drive East, 403, 405, 409 Jane Street, and 400,
402, 406 A&B, 408 Eisenhower Street, and being more generally
located north of University Drive East between Jane Street and
Eisenhower Street, being located in the Richard Carter Survey,
Abstract No. 8, College Station, Brazos County, Texas. Said tract
being all of Lot 1, Black Eyed Pea Addition, according to the plat
recorded in Volume 1233, Page 531 of the Official Records of
Brazos County, Texas, and all of Lots 3-11 and a portion of Lot 2,
Block "A", College Heights, according to the plat recorded in
Volume 124, Page 259 of the Deed Records of Brazos County,
Texas.
APPLICANT:
Mitchell & Morgan, LLP
PROJECT MANAGER:
Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Principal Planner
jprochazka@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 8
August 6, 2015
« V 2 /
\10
en
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of
August 6, 2015
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 6, 2015
Advertised Council Hearing Date: August 27, 2015
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
None
Property owner notices mailed:
Contacts in support:
Contacts in opposition
Inquiry contacts:
ADJACENT LAND USES
37
None at the time of staff report.
None at the time of staff report.
One at the time of staff report.
Direction
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning
Land Use
North
Urban and
R-4 Multi -Family
Apartment buildings
Redevelopment
South
Urban and
GC General
Retail and restaurant
(Across University
Redevelopment
Commercial
Drive East)
East
Urban and
D Duplex and GC
Single-family homes and
(Across Eisenhower
Redevelopment
General Commercial
retail
Street
West
Urban and
GC General
Office, retail and
(Across Jane Street)
Redevelopment
Commercial
restaurant
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1939
Zoning: Properties zoned Apartment District on or after Annexation
1973 - University Drive frontage zoned C-1 General Commercial
1978- Remainder of property zoned A -P Administrative/Professional
1989 — Portion of the A -P zoned C-1 General Commercial
2012- A -P renamed O Office
2012- C-1 renamed GC General Commercial
Final Plat: A portion of the property is platted as Black Eyed Pea Lot 1 (1991). The
remainder of the property is platted as a part of the College Heights Subdivision (1938).
Site development: Property is developed with existing restaurant with frontage on University
Drive East. The remainder of the property is developed as seven single-family homes.
PROPOSAL
The applicant has requested a PDD Planned Development District rezoning based on the MU
Mixed Use zoning district for the development of a multi -story hotel with a parking garage. The
MU district allows hotel uses to meet both the residential and non-residential requirements. The
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 8
August 6, 2015
properties are currently developed as single-family homes and a restaurant, but proposed to be
consolidated for redevelopment.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject area is designated on the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map as Urban and Redevelopment.
The Comprehensive Plan states that this designation is for areas that should have the most
intense level of development consisting of vertical mixed use and other aspects of urban
character. The proposed zoning permits mixed-use along University Drive East, allowing the
property to be redeveloped consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood: The property immediately to the north is
developed with apartment buildings and a cell tower. Properties to the east are developed
as single-family homes, generally not compatible with a hotel with a structured parking
garage. These homes, however, are designated for redevelopment to urban densities in the
future. To the west, across Jane Street, and to the south, across University Drive East,
properties are developed as office, retail and restaurant and are compatible with the
proposed hotel development.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The property is in
close proximity to Texas A&M University, with frontage to University Drive East and access
to two local streets. With the appropriate upgrades to existing utility infrastructure at the time
of private development of the property (as discussed below), the subject property is suitable
for the proposed hotel use and other uses permitted by the MU Mixed Use base zoning
district.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
majority of the property is currently zoned for O Office, but developed as single-family
homes. The properties are suitable for office development. The portion of the property with
frontage to University Drive East is currently zoned GC General Commercial and developed
as a restaurant. The property is suitable for the restaurant use and other uses permitted in
the GC district.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The subject
property is marketable with its current zoning of O Office and GC General Commercial,
however, the requested rezoning allows for the consolidation and redevelopment of
properties into a mixed-use development.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water distribution and sanitary sewer
infrastructure is limited immediately adjacent to the property. The waterlines in the area are
currently undersized for the proposed use and will have to be upgraded by the developer
with this project. The developer will provide the necessary waterline improvements to serve
the development. The newly constructed Cooner Street sewerline has sufficient capacity for
this development, however sewerline upgrades from the subject property to the Cooner
Street line may be required by the developer at the time of site development.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 8
August 6, 2015
The subject property is located in the Burton Creek Drainage Basin and development of the
subject property is required to meet the minimum standards of the City's Storm Water
Design Guidelines. The subject property is not encroached by a Special Flood Hazard Area
per FEMA FIRM Panel 215F.
The subject property has frontage on University Drive East, a 6 -lane Major Arterial on the
City's Thoroughfare Plan. The property has access to Jane Street and Eisenhower Street,
both local streets.
REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN
The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building and
parking areas as well as other site related features. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also
request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those
variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development.
The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for
reviewing PDD Concept Plans:
1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with
the character of the surrounding area;
2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and
purpose of this Section;
3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not
adversely affect adjacent development;
4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street
directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association;
5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not
limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities;
6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle,
or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated
by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing
zoning and land uses in the area.
General
The Concept Plan includes the consolidation and redevelopment of properties for a hotel and
structured parking. The buildings are multi -story and placed close to the street to create an
urban character. A small surface parking lot is proposed at the corner of University Drive East
and Jane Street and an access drive connecting Jane Street to Eisenhower Street at the rear of
the property. The proposed Concept Plan includes new sidewalk along all rights-of-way, which
will provide opportunities for safe pedestrian activity. As redevelopment occurs in the area,
more sidewalks will be built and create a network of pedestrian facilities.
Building Height — The hotel building will be approximately 95 feet tall and the two-level parking
garage will be approximately 25 feet tall, at the highest point.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 of 8
August 6, 2015
Drainage — The applicant states that the site sits at a hilltop and drainage from the site flows in
four directions: to the northeast along University Drive East, to the southwest along University
Drive East, to the west along Jane Street, and to the west along Eisenhower Street. The site will
be graded to match or reduce the flows along University Drive East by reducing the drainage
area, and the flows along Jane Street and Eisenhower Street will be matched or reduced by
underground stormwater detention. There is no storm drain in any of the outfall locations, so all
stormwater shall be released into the curb lines.
Requested Modifications
The applicant has requested the following modifications from the requirements of the Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO).
1. Maximum Front Setback Requirement- The applicant has requested to vary from UDO
Section 12-5.2 "Residential Dimensional Standards," specifically the maximum front
setback requirement. The MU district requires a maximum front setback of 15 feet. The
front setback may be increased to 85 feet to accommodate parking between the street
and the building. Parking has been provided in front of the building, however, the
driveway from Jane Street to the parking lot is required to be placed at least 130 feet
from University Drive East to provide safer driveway spacing. This driveway and parking
area also provides required fire truck access to ensure proper building fire protection
coverage.
2. Required Cross -Access Between Commercial Sites — The applicant has requested to
vary from UDO Section 12-7.4.8.2 "Cross -Access Easements." Developing and
redeveloping properties are required to provide cross -access to adjoining properties.
Two potential locations were identified for an easement: across the front of the
properties and through the parking lot along University Drive East, or across the
properties along Eisenhower Street. The applicant states that as the hotel guest drop-off
area there are safety concerns for the guests if through -traffic were allowed through the
lot. The applicant also states that the alternative location along Eisenhower Street
interferes with the amount of buildable area and placement of the garage. As an
alternative, the Concept Plan includes a pedestrian cross access sidewalk along the
front of the properties as well as cross access between Jane Street and Eisenhower
Street at the rear of the property.
These properties sit on a small block of land where cross -access would not serve the
same purpose for vehicular circulation as it would on a larger piece of property, such as
a large shopping center with several pad sites. The cross -access at the back of the
property will provide an alternative for crossing between Jane Street and Eisenhower
Street without interfering with University Drive traffic. Cross -access easements also
allow consumers the ability to access adjacent properties without leaving the larger
property. The applicant states that it is unlikely that the consumers using the neighboring
property would need to access the hotel; however, the guests who would like to access
the adjacent property may utilize the sidewalk along the front of the properties as a safe
pedestrian alternative.
3. Non -Residential Architectural Standards for the Parking Garage- The applicant has
requested to vary from UDO Section 12-7.10 "Non -Residential Architectural
Standards" (NRA) for the parking garage. A two-level garage is proposed. As a non-
residential structure, it is required to meet the NRA standards, including requirements for
building materials, fagade and roofline articulation, architectural relief, and building
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 7 of 8
August 6, 2015
colors. The applicant states that the required architectural relief elements for both the
horizontal fagade and roofline present construction challenges as garages are typically
built using precast concrete walls. As an alternative, the applicant is offering to use a
green screen as a form of horizontal architectural relief at the same percentage standard
(no more than 66 percent of the fagade is permitted to be on the same plane).
Additionally, the applicant is requesting a waiver to roofline articulation and allowable
building material requirement as the use of concrete on facades facing a right-of-way will
consist of more than 10 percent. The garage will meet building color standards.
Requested Zoning Condition
The applicant has requested approval of the PDD Planned Development District with the
condition that the zoning be made effective upon the sale of the subject properties to MH
Hospitality.
Community Benefits
The applicant identified the following community benefits to offset proposed meritorious
modifications:
• The project includes the consolidation and rebuilding of several properties that have
been identified as prime for redevelopment. These properties are adjacent to a major
intersection in College Station and in proximity to other mixed-use developments,
creating a desired urban feel to the area.
• The redevelopment will require upgrading substandard infrastructure, including new
water and sewer lines and improving rights-of-way with curbing and sidewalks. These
public improvements, while required, will be expedited with this project.
• The improvements to the property and infrastructure have the potential to be a catalyst
for future redevelopments to surrounding properties and continue the urban renewal in
the area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend approval of the rezoning request.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Modifications Request Letter
3. Rezoning Map
4. Concept Plan
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 8 of 8
August 6, 2015
CITY OP COLLEGE STATION
Home of 7&a A&M Univeaity'
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITTED:
TIME:
STAFF:
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION
PLANNED DISTRICTS
(Check one) 0 ($1,165) Planned Development District (PDD)
❑ ($1,165) Planned Mixed -Used Development (P -MUD)
❑ ($315) Modification to Existing PDD or P -MUD Amendment - Planning & Zoning Commission and
City Council Review
Please use Concept Plan Minor Amendment Application far minor amendments as per Section 3.4.J of the UDO.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
❑X $315 - 1,165 Rezoning Application Fee.
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
❑X Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the
proposed request.
❑X One (1) copy of a fully dimensioned Rezoning Map on 24"x36" paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change;
c. Present zoning;
d, Zoning classification of all abutting land; and
e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is
applicable).
❑X A CAD (dxftdwg) - model space State Plane NAD 83 or GIS (Shp) digital file (e-mailed to
pdsd igitalsubmittaI0),cstx.gov).
❑X One (1) copy of the Concept Plan on 24"x36" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the LIDO.
❑X One (1) copy of the Concept Plan on 8.5"x11" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the LIDO.
❑X The attached Concept Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
checked off.
NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed
within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference June 18, 2015
NAME OF PROJECT Embassy Suites
ADDRESS 403, 405, 409 Jane Street and 400, 402, 406 A&B, 408 Eisenhower Street 201 University Drive East
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) See below
GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY IF NOT PLATTED:
Lots 3-11 and part of Lot 2, Block A', College Heights Subdivision and Lot 1, Black Eyed Pea Addition
TOTAL ACREAGE 2.429 acres
Revised 5115 Page 1 of 7
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Mitchell & Morgan, LLP c%CrissyHartl E-mail crissy@mitche/landmorgan.com
Street Address 3204 Earl Rudder Freeway
City College Station
Phone Number 979-260-6963
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Richard Lemons and Gilbert Lemons
Street Address 301 Sophia Lane
City College Station
Phone Number 979-255-1950
State TX
Fax Number
State 7X
Fax Number
Zip Code 77845
E-mail Ricklemons92@gmail.com
Zip Code 77845
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.):
Name Ted Ent-MHHospitality E-mail tent@machaikcom
Street Address 11757 Katy Freeway
City Houston State 7X Zip Code 77079
Phone Number 512-650-6029
Fax Number
281-596-6444
This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated 3/17/2005 and recorded in Volume 6573 Page 212
of the Brazos County Official Records.
Existing Zoning O Office, GC General Commercial Proposed Zoning PDD -Planned Development District
Present Use of Property Single-family and duplex residences, former restaurant
Proposed Use of Property Hotel
Proposed Use(s) of Property for PDD, if applicable:
The proposed development is fora hotel.
P -MUD uses are prescribed in Section 6.2.C. Use Table of the Unified Development Ordinance.
If P -MUD:
Approximate percentage of residential land uses: Not applicable
Approximate percentage of non-residential land uses: Not applicable
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary.
area of College Station has been the target of desired redevelopment, where consolidating properties and
`ing an urban feel are encouraged. This proposed development would achieve that goal.
Revised 5/15 Page 2 of 7
Z, Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the
Plan is incorrect.
The proposed zoning of a PDD based on the MU Mixed Use district, is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan for
this area, as it is designated as Urban Mixed Use. The comprehensive plan states that this "designation is generally
For areas that should have the most intense development activities." The proposed base zoning district allows for
this type of development.
3. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with
the character of the neighborhood?
The zoning districts and uses of the surrounding properties include GC General Commercial (First American Bank),
O Office (including two office buildings and non -conforming residential uses), D Duplex (duplexes), MF Multi -Family
(four-plexes). The zoning request is for PDD with MU Mixed Use as a base zoning. The proposed change will be
compatible with the existing mix of commercial and residential uses, as a hotel satisfies both the residential and
commercial component in the MU district.
4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
the proximity to the major intersection of Texas Avenue and University Drive, the proximity to Texas A&M
sity, and other nearby mixed use developments, this area of College Station is ideal for urban style
pments, such as those permitted by the MU district.
5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
uses permitted by the existing GC General Commercial and O Office zoning district are suitable for the
many are also permitted in the MU Mixed Use district. This change is being requested due to the larger
welopment by consolidating several properties into an urban style development,
6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
The location of this property is appropriate for office developments, many of which are also permitted in the MU
Mixed Use district.
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change.
oite being very close to a major intersection and Texas A&M University, this older area of College Station has
:ral challenges that have made redevelopment difficult. Those challenges include substandard utility and
Way infrastructure and non -conforming residential uses. This redevelopment will consolidate several properties
could potentially be a catalyst for future redevelopments in the area.
Revised 5/15 Page 3 of 7
8. State the purpose and intent of the proposed development.
2.
purpose of the development is to consolidate properties and redevelop them into a hotel.
CONCEPT PLAN SUPPORTING INFORMATION
What is the range of future building heights?
The hotel building will be approximately 95' and the two-level garage is expected to be around 25, at the highest
point,
-roviae a general siacement regaraing me proposea
site sits at a hilltop and drainage from the site flows in four directions: to the Northeast along University, to the
'hwest along University, to the west along Jane, and to the west along Eisenhower. The site will be graded to
:h orreduce the flows along Universityby reducing the drainage area, and the flows along Jane and
nhower will matched or reduced by underground detention. There is no storm drain in any of the outfall
dons, so all stormwater shall be released into the curb lines.
3. List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought.
attached Bulk Variance letter.
4_ If variations are sought, please provide a list of community benefits and/or innovative design concepts to justify the
attached Bulk Variance letter.
Revised 5/15 Page 4 of 7
5. Explain how the concept plan proposal will constitute and environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony
with the character of the surrounding area.
concept plan presents an urban style development along a high -traffic and commercial corridor, This
;lopment will add to the existing character of the surrounding area by redeveloping these underperforming sites
a more sustainable use of the property.
6, Explain how the proposal is inconformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
property is identified in Redevelopment Area 11 in the Comprehensive Plan, which is described as having
rperforming land uses close to two major corridors, making it ideal for redevelopment. This proposed
lopment will be making use of the MU Mixed Use district as an incentive for redevelopment,
7. Explain how the concept plan proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not
91
artect
existing and permitted uses on abutting sites include a bank, multi -family housing, offices, and other
imercial uses. The proposed hotel as a mixed-use development is compatible with these developments and will
adversely affect their uses.
applicable
units snaii nave access to a ouooc street it
g. State how the development has provided adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to: parks, schools,
and other public facilities,
This development will require improving and upgrading substandard streets and utilities in order to handle this
facility. These improvements will serve not only the development, but the public as well.
Revised 5115 Page 5 of 7
10. Explain how the concept plan proposal will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
its redevelopment will include several necessary improvements to public infrastructure and will not be detrimental
the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to the surrounding properties.
11. Explain how the concept plan proposal will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or
pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and
other uses reasonable anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area.
The proposed concept plan will include new sidewalks along all rights of way, which will provide much needed
opportunities for safe pedestrian activity. As redevelopment occurs in the area, more sidewalks will be built and
create a network of pedestrian facilities. The proposed development will also meet driveway standards for safe
vehicular circulation, especially to the traffic coming off of University Drive.
Please note that a "complete site plan" must be submitted to Planning & Development Services for a formal review after
he "concept plan" has been approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit - except for single-
family development.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf.
,ignature and title
G/ X25
21
Date -
Revised 5/15 Page 6 of 7
to Explain how the concept plan proposal will not be detrimental to the public health, safetyor welfare, or be materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity
This redevelopment will inclucie saverai necessary improvements to public infrastructure and will not be detrimental
to the public hearth safety ni weifare or materially injurious to the surrounding proporites.
f Explain how the concept plan proposal will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or
Pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and
other uses reasonable anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area.
P,", wncept pian ivo, include newsrdeivalks along all rights of way, which will provide much needed
Opportunities for safe pedestrian activity As redevelopment occurs in the area more sidewalks will be built and
create a nehvork ofpedestnan facilities The proposed development will also meal driveway standards for safe
vehicular circulation, especially to the traffic coming off of University Drive
Please note that a "complete site plan" must be submitted to Planning & Development Services for a formal review after
the 'concept plan' has been approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit - except for single-
family development
The applicant .has prepared this application and certifies that the farts stared herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct. and complete IF THIS APPLICATION /S FILED 9Y ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner If there is more
than one owner all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company. the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on Its behalf
e�
Sig ( rid title ���0 4 �Yy �71Q � �a�
Remsea 5115
' - � 9 , X015
Page 6 of 7
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name: Peterson Equities, LLC—Jeff Peterson
Street Address: 1912 Taft Avenue
City: Loveland
State: CO
Phone Number: 970-669-7000
Email: petersonentities@gmail.com
CONCEPTUAL PDDIP-MUD SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
❑X A key map (not necessarily to scale).
❑X Title block to include:
❑X Name, address, location, and legal description.
❑x Name, address, and telephone number of applicant
❑X Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
❑X Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
Date of submittal
QX Total site area
North arrow.
100 -year floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if
there is none on the site.
❑x Show the approximate location of the following:
❑X Parking areas
❑Q Building sites and an indication of their use
Xx Artificially lit areas
Open spaces/conservation areas
Greenways
❑x Streets and access
Parks
Schools
(} Trails
jtl I tj-'� Buffer areas (or a statement indicating buffering proposed)
�L} Other special features
Approximate accessways, pedestrian and bikeways.
Common and open space areas.
Revised 5/15 Print Form Page 7 of 7
�/IITCHELL
�rwM�
MORGAN
Jennifer Prochazka, AICP
City of College Station
Planning and Development Services
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842
July 6, 2015
Re: EMBASSY SUITES REDEVELOPMENT AT UNIVERSITY DRIVE AND JANE
STREET/EISENHOWER STREET (REZ-PDD)
Dear Jennifer,
As discussed, we are requesting the following bulk variances.
Listed below are the bulk variances that we are seeking for the Embassy Suites rezoning:
Understanding that we must choose a base zoning district for the residential development upon which
we base all variance requests, we have chosen MU — Mixed Use as our base district.
1. The rezoning be conditional based on the sale of the property to MH Hospitality.
2. Allow for a variation to the maximum front setback requirement.
This district requires a maximum front setback of 15'. The front setback may be increased to 85'
to accommodate a parking lot between the street and the building. Parking has been provided in
front of the building, however, the driveway from Jane Street to the parking lot was required to be
placed at least 130' from University Drive due to staff recommendation for driveway spacing
standards. This driveway and parking area also provides required fire truck access to ensure
proper building protection coverage.
3. A waiver to the required cross access easement between properties.
Developing and redeveloping properties are required to provide cross access to adjoining
properties. Two potential locations were identified for an easement: across the front of the
properties and through the parking lot along University, or across the properties along Eisenhower
Street. The parking lot will be utilized as the hotel's guest drop off area and raises safety concerns
for the guests if through -traffic were allowed through the lot. The alternative location along
Eisenhower interferes with the amount of buildable area and placement of the garage. As an
alternative, we have provided a pedestrian cross access sidewalk along the front of the properties,
as well as cross access between Jane Street and Eisenhower Street at the back of the property.
These properties sit on a small block of land where cross access would not serve the same
purpose for vehicular circulation as it would on a larger piece of property, such as a large shopping
center with several padsites. The cross access at the back of the property will provide an
alternative for crossing between Jane and Eisenhower without interfering with University Drive
traffic. Cross access easements also allow consumers the ability to access adjacent properties
without leaving the larger property. It is unlikely that the consumers using the neighboring property
3204 EARL RUDDER FVVY. S. • COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 • T 979.260.6963 • F 979.260.3564
CIVIL ENGINEERING HYDRAULICS HYDROLOGY UTILITIES STREET5 SITE PUNS SUBDIVISIONS
Info®mHchellandmargan com • www-mrtchellandmorgan mm
would need to access the hotel; however, the guests who would like to access the adjacent
property may utilize the sidewalk along the front of the properties as a safe pedestrian alternative.
4. A waiver to the Non -Residential Architectural standards for the garage
A two-level garage will be provided to accommodate parking for the hotel guests and staff. As a
non-residential structure, it is required to meet the non-residential architectural standards, as
spelled out in the UDO. Those standards include requirements for building materials, fagade and
roofline articulation, architectural relief and building colors. Required architectural relief elements
for both the horizontal fagade and roofline present construction challenges as garages are typically
built using precast concrete walls. As an alternative, we are offering the use of green screens as
a form of horizontal architectural relief at the same percentage standard. Additionally, we are
asking for a waiver to roofline articulation and allowable building material requirements as the use
of concrete on facades facing a right-of-way will consist of more than 10 percent. The garage will
meet building color standards.
Garages in the Northgate districts are exempt from these standards, and we are asking for this
garage to be held to the same standard as those built in the Northgate design districts.
As stated in the UDO, the purpose of the Planned Development district is to promote and encourage
innovative development that is sensitive to surrounding land uses and to the natural environment. A
PDD may be used to permit new or innovative concepts in land utilization not permitted by other zoning
districts. Finally, the PD District allows development to vary from certain development standards so
long as there are community benefits which outweigh the requested modifications. We believe that
this project offers a desired redevelopment opportunity and its community benefits certainly outweigh
modifications being requested. These community benefits are as follows:
1. This project includes the consolidation and rebuilding of several properties that have been
identified as prime for redevelopment. These properties are adjacent to a major intersection in
College Station and in proximity to other mixed-use developments, creating a desired urban feel
to the area.
2. The redevelopment will require upgrading substandard infrastructure, including new water and
sewer lines and improving rights-of-way with curbing and sidewalks. These public improvements,
while required, will be expedited with this project.
3. The improvements to the property and infrastructure have the potential to be a catalyst for future
redevelopments to surrounding properties and continue the urban renewal in the area.
you very much. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Veronica J.WMlogag�, PE, CFM
Managing Partner
Cc: File
PROJECT BENCHMARK:
S/TE
VICINITY MAP
(NTS)
EXISTING ZONING
LEGEND
0 PDD
— PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
0 GC
— GENERAL COMMERCIAL
0 O
— OFFICE
0 R-4
— MULTI—FAMILY
D
— DUPLEX
---- PROPERTY LINE
— � — LOT
LINE
— EASEMENT
(30' R.O.W.)
`9 .4. �J
v..y
EXISTING ZONING
� 4
7.979.260.6963
F.979.260.3564
TX. FIRM / F-1443
COONER STREET
��'�;; J��
PIAN t OESIGN SPECMLISTS IN
/
ZONED: R-4 / /
SITE PIANS • SUBON51ON3
5
f1J / / / /
(30' R.O.W.)
`9 .4. �J
v..y
f
�
�
MULTI—FAMILY /
/
z c m m
rn s
.y sd
�
-fiTn / /
/
-O IJ O_ {"
• B4�-
'
/ C LEC HEI TS ( S) /
LO�h T ¢l Rt /
/ (Vpl. 9 P� 1
� /
/ y /
/
o
�
N
/
jTj / ,,,� C E�1R/ /
(P
B/L(�ol� 3
//
W+,
/
/
�
� /
� •
�9
Jam.
/� //
O—OFFICE / / / /
�
� 532J. P9 56�/
/
�
m
J
�/
/ /C LOf�EG{ HEI TS 1C9)
/
/
/ / � �
�
/ fp'.[�p`'U@.�
/
/ / / /
/ /
/ /
I
/ / /
/
O
m
LO 3039.JP9. (P49)F)
%%
_�_ �
00 C ER
L O de / OC212. W I 190) / � /
/
y T1-4�55Z1�
Z
=
�E-f].8i'
Jo.
�ol
/ / / /
,.'O
0
'1'
y
QC qL
y
-
+ + + + + + +
/
I
OL E IC (
P T 1/ )
+ + + + + + +
/
." rE
L
J
.n
OL E IC
�.�w•
11J
_ ZONED: R-4 /
�
I + + + + + + +
�
S
CA
/ /
/
(
� MULTI—FAMILY / /
�
+ + + COLLEGE HEJr.HTSi(CS)'
�
/ /
�4 $,
I/ / C LEG Ts < s> /
LOr�A, T §A-Rl / /
/ (V 9 Pg 1 �
� C 6
]
PPI
m
/
/ CO ER/ /
BLOBiC 3 OT (P OF)
I + + + B�OCKiB, L(1T ]
y,
� — /_ �- — � i� / 1 4
—
� ' 'hy'.[�'p�`'�G$'��
�
L
J1
,(Vol. 5320 Pg 561/
/
I �
/ j—C
EK NEI TSfiIC-RS) /
//
/
/ / /
/
LO
LO T �
//J/.
� i .
ZONED:
ZONED:
— — — —
�+
GC—GENERAL
1T4�3� -6'1.3i'
O—OFFICE
+ + + + +
COMMERCIAL
�
+
+ + + + + + + +
Jb
'fin_ O„
"V�4a'f
F �
GE HEIGHTS (C9) �
I + + + + + + +
F
+ + + + + + + +
} } } } } } } }
iE
I
I.L011695. BT 823) J$_� m
-or COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS)
+ + + + + + +
I
+ + + + + + + +
+ + COLLEGE HE�HTS}(CS)f +
BLOCK A, LOT 6 (HALF OF) 0 ]
L C
�
I
+ + CQLL HEJFHTS}(C}S}}
a
�
I
LL HT CS
L 1 1
L T 2 F
`moi
�s
+ + + + + + + +
OCCK
+++++(yo��]4�+Pg�. �BO)+
F
�rt &
Taj
aria
�-�n
I
I 1
I
I
I
I + + + + + + +
} + + + + + + +
'� .�
*4,�
� �
ZONED:
— — — —
I + + +
+ + +
� —. — . —. —
la:
°
''
I
— s
ZONED:
ss'��
��
LO � � � .LO � �
_
I
+++++++++++++
} �} D—DUPLEX
LOT ,0 LOT 5�
} } } } } } } }
�
COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS)
BLOCK 0. LOT 5 & HALF OF 6
W
y
iL'.v
+ + COLLEC€ HFIFHTS{(CS}F }
+ + +Ivo�GC�4iZ' +
�'
COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS) I (Vol. 6699, Pg. 253)
'fit
,Gy'�;an.4 a
I ^, f. `
£
BLOCK 0. LOT 9-10-11
;
Fil
+ +
OC1I55��BFiG�H�ppTTF9CS)F
�
�
(Vol. 10162. Pq. 053) I
I_
Z
I (CyPLL
(Ko� �3'1 L+ pg.+2+1
REPUBUCBANK ADDRION
LOT 1, ACRES 4.4542
— 3 4t'62'OO��50.01�®
�
r a
+ + + +
�'
ma
z + + + +
(Vol. 11085. Pq. 022)
0 [_
o D �
w uu: a n•enxa• • t •, »t
� i
'AO
�
O
�
� + + + + + + +
� + + + + + +
Ipz Z
�
+ + + D DUPLEX
+"
■_
44pp..4i- I
PDD—PLANNED �
DEVELOPMENT �
�
m
�+ •—+ + + +—+
+ + +
O Il'I
I � � CIr1 I I
Jo.
m
LL N CCS
�
m
�
C%i!
IE—
I � +
4. -�� ,.
�g I�
8
� �
��
�^
L A. OT CS F)
(n
y
�
}
I� L
N
� ITI
I
�a� �
J
"yR
]
_
y
�
+ + } T CpBLL�EGE HFiLGHT� (C5�
I
td'
�
I
+ +
+ 7g � +
REPUBLICBANK ADDITION
�
�
_
I�¢�p
LOT 1, ACRES 4.4542
(Vol. 11065, Pg. 022)
m
� L
� �,. s •rt td� T6T�
�
O
C+
� + + + + + + +
I
�
�
� + + + + + +
.++++(Vo71C24+66{L�g.+1�4+
+ +++++ + +
loom
J
1:=+ I
W
m I I
L
�.yp� uc.�'
l8 a"'fi
���
II
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + + +
^�'
A�
I=�
� — —
I��
I J �1.�Ir COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS)
T � sww^ BLOCK A, LOT 2 (5' OF)
�
r�
y
r r.•
I�
m Iv
_ I
I
T�
1�
yA 8 PT OF 3
�nY�
I
�
�fJ • (Vol. 91 ]9. Pq. 105)
�
m
} + } + �EGE+BF{IGHT; f1(QCS� + �
~ �
�
3$ I
I
BLACK EYED PFA
LOT 1
[OFyI
+ + 1Yol. }24+68+ �g.+li4y
� I
�
I y�$
I
yz
1
(Vol. 65]3. Pg. 212)
O OA T'11G P T 2
�oa1��°�i9�t"�9d
x"�3
S'� I
y I
I
o® VIl. s •rmkY w fa.Tz. mla/Yp
No ] o
®
��€
m
2
T z.
I
��
�.. � COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS)
S� �S 1
�z I
ZONED:
I•gs
^
T�
I
BLACKLOEYED PEA
(P" BLOCK B, LOT R (PT OF)
Nol. 11191. Pq. 10])
I
��I
I �
GC—GENERAL
�
_
�� I
�"
mm
I
�
I
I
COMMERCIAL
O A, T 1 P 2
�&
��
��'¢
�`d'`�k
-?♦,�rs,�
��
E�
J ��
�
�
-'
-
I ZONED:
GC—GENERAL
'`w�'.TV 4�
..f �
I �
;
m �
I COMMERCIAL
P.. COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS)
I
^�
Im�
Q�J��'4
~
�z
I I I
�"
1�=
152��
91. Pg.(PO])�
ti r,J
`�
I
I
��
I
��,�
'�°:s
�
— — — — —
140539]
Tit t
®1rw.�Ox �Si�
m I �+ I
— — — —
®w� •a�'RM � tl�
�.Qcei�3�,
�-� a�J• I
UNIVERSITY DRIVE
E.
I
. ,� ��,,,�
100' R.O.W.
��
I t tMn - 4o r..t I
y'
— — — —
14��1t o�nn 14V�Iv��m�
EXISTING ZONING
PROPOSED ZONING
� 4
7.979.260.6963
F.979.260.3564
TX. FIRM / F-1443
COONER STREET
LLEGE STATION, TX ]]645
PIAN t OESIGN SPECMLISTS IN
CNIL ENGINEERMG • HYORAULIC'e
HYDROLOG •UTILITIES •STREETS
SITE PIANS • SUBON51ON3
www.mkehdlondmo On.eom
S7�
� � y
(30' R.O.W.)
�'�5���
����
�'-m
in�Qj
n�
z c m m
rn s
.y sd
�pU
— — � — /
-O IJ O_ {"
l7 �Z�O
d S � N
— — —
a
m
c
ZONED: / // /
//
0
/� //
O—OFFICE / / / /
�
m
J
I
/ /
/
/
/ /
/ /
I
/ / /
/
O
m
LO 3039.JP9. (P49)F)
%%
_�_ �
00 C ER
L O de / OC212. W I 190) / � /
/
Z
=
oI.
/ /
Jo.
�ol
/ / / /
,.'O
0
/
/ / /
/ /
C0
/
I
� J /(y BL 1 1 �
P T 1/ )
J
�h �
�C�
/
'�
N
/
/
�.�w•
11J
_ ZONED: R-4 /
�
/
�
S
CA
/ /
/
A �
� MULTI—FAMILY / /
�
�
/ /
�4 $,
I/ / C LEG Ts < s> /
LOr�A, T §A-Rl / /
/ (V 9 Pg 1 �
/
/
N
�
PPI
m
/
/ CO ER/ /
BLOBiC 3 OT (P OF)
y,
� — /_ �- — � i� / 1 4
—
� ' 'hy'.[�'p�`'�G$'��
�
�
J1
,(Vol. 5320 Pg 561/
/
I �
/ j—C
EK NEI TSfiIC-RS) /
//
/
/ / /
/
LO T �
//J/.
1T4�3� -6'1.3i'
'1'
'�:
N
�¢�
+
+ + + + + + + +
Jb
'fin_ O„
"V�4a'f
F �
GE HEIGHTS (C9) �
_
+ + + + + + + +
} } } } } } } }
iE
I
I.L011695. BT 823) J$_� m
-or COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS)
I
+ + + + + + + +
+ + COLLEGE HE�HTS}(CS)f +
BLOCK A, LOT 6 (HALF OF) 0 ]
I
+ + + BFOCKip, L112T 7} + +
L4.I � — — �J (V�oT.'9301, Pg. 042)
+ + + + + + + +
LOT 9 LOT 6
I
I
I
ZONED:
— — — —
� —. — . —. —
GC—GENERAL
I
I
COMMERCIAL
�' '
LO � � � .LO � �
I
+++++++++++++
LOT ,0 LOT 5�
} } } } } } } }
�
COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS)
BLOCK 0. LOT 5 & HALF OF 6
W
y
iL'.v
+ + COLLEC€ HFIFHTS{(CS}F }
+ + +Ivo�GC�4iZ' +
�'
COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS) I (Vol. 6699, Pg. 253)
'fit
PART nB�)
+ + Y- � + i- + +
:eq I
�'
BLOCK 0. LOT 9-10-11
+ + + + + + + +
Y' i
(Vol. 10162. Pq. 053) I
I_
+ + + + + + + +
'����
�=
I
+ + + +
�;T��a�
ma
— `°�°� ,, - ZONED: — — L°�°� a —
es
'� %�,
�
+ + + D DUPLEX
s m4.�b
���3.''�
■_
44pp..4i- I
PDD—PLANNED �
DEVELOPMENT �
�
+ + +
,>� <'
I�,.� I �¢ ,�,
'+�
� COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS)
DISTRICT
�
171
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + +
4. -�� ,.
�g I�
8
>E ( YoBLocsao: �T 1zo)
(n
I
e H H
+ +GyP 4EK�EIG{�SF Ccsk +
�.+w
��
I� L
m
�
td'
Z
I
+ +
+ 7g � +
REPUBLICBANK ADDITION
_ 5 4t• OO• yy// t60.Ot' M _ _ � LOT a
— — — —
_
y-o�+231 +2�1
} } +
+ } + + + } +
LOT 1, ACRES 4.4542
(Vol. 11065, Pg. 022)
m
� L
� �,. s •rt td� T6T�
�
O
C+
� + + + + + + +
� D �
�
�
� + + + + + +
loom
J
m
���
II
^�'
A�
I=�
� — —
I��
I J �1.�Ir COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS)
T � sww^ BLOCK A, LOT 2 (5' OF)
�
r�
y
(n
�
I�
+++++
+ + + + i
� + + + + +
T�
1�
yA 8 PT OF 3
� m N
S y m I
I
�
�fJ • (Vol. 91 ]9. Pq. 105)
�
m
} + } + �EGE+BF{IGHT; f1(QCS� + �
~ �
:�
�
[OFyI
+ + 1Yol. }24+68+ �g.+li4y
� I
�
1
I
�oa1��°�i9�t"�9d
+ + + + + + '
I
o® VIl. s •rmkY w fa.Tz. mla/Yp
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + + '
I
I
BLACKLOEYED PEA
I
I Na�
��
_
�� I
(Vol. 6573. Pq. 212) O IG
I ��
_
O A, T 1 P 2
��'¢
it� I I
F
(Vo 7 O
-'
-
�
I
m �
+��
P.. COLLEGE HEIGHTS (CS)
I
^�
Im�
BL�VOI. Bl
�z
I I I
�"
1�=
152��
91. Pg.(PO])�
`�
I
ZONED:
��
I
��,�
'�°:s
}� I �
�� J �
O—OFFICE
ZONED:
I GC—GENERAL
m I �+ I
I
�.Qcei�3�,
�-� a�J• I
I COMMERCIAL
I
. ,� ��,,,�
� I I
I
y'
— — — —
14��1t o�nn 14V�Iv��m�
— — — —
.t
N� pp
tm • x'YW " iM
UNIVERSITY DRIVE E.
100' R.O.W.
I 1 tna -n1`.o tre I
PROPOSED ZONING
� 4
7.979.260.6963
F.979.260.3564
TX. FIRM / F-1443
3204 EARL RUDDER FWY. 5
LLEGE STATION, TX ]]645
PIAN t OESIGN SPECMLISTS IN
CNIL ENGINEERMG • HYORAULIC'e
HYDROLOG •UTILITIES •STREETS
SITE PIANS • SUBON51ON3
www.mkehdlondmo On.eom
S7�
� � y
�6� �ygy
E���E�R
�'�5���
����
�'-m
in�Qj
n�
z c m m
rn s
.y sd
�pU
W
O
-O IJ O_ {"
l7 �Z�O
d S � N
` ���
�z
a
m
c
0
�m
.�
Z
N
_�_ �
N
I�
W
EX
ARCHITECTURE
PLANNING
INTERIORS
3221 WEST ALABAMA
HOUSTON TEXAS 77098
713/522-10154
713/522-4496 FAX
DATE
7/6/15 REZONING SUBMITTAL
PROJECT NUMBER:
1509
SHEET NUMBER:
goo.,0_.—
College Station, TX City Hal'
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, TX 77840
Legislation Details (With Text)
File #:
15-0408 Version: 1 Name: UDO Amendment - Single -Family Parking
Type:
Unified Development Status: Agenda Ready
Ordinance
File created:
7/21/2015 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda:
8/62015 Final action:
Title:
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to Chapter 12,
"Unified Development Ordinance," Article 8 "Subdivision Design and Improvements," Section 12-8.3
"General Requirements and Minimum Standards of Design for Subdivisions within the City Limits,"
Section W "Single -Family Residential Parking Requirements for Platting," and Chapter 12, "Unified
Development Ordinance," Article 11 "Definitions" Section 11.2 "Defined Terms" ofthe Code of
Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, regarding Single -Family Residential Parking
Requirements for Platting. Case #ORDA2015-000002 (J. Prochazka) (Note: Final action on this item
is scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change.)
Sponsors:
Jennifer Prochazka
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments:
Staff Memo
Proposed Ordinance
Date
Ver. Action By Action Result
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to Chapter 12,
"Unified Development Ordinance," Article 8 "Subdivision Design and Improvements," Section 12-8.3
"General Requirements and Minimum Standards of Design for Subdivisions within the City Limits,"
Section W "Single -Family Residential Parking Requirements for Platting," and Chapter 12, "Unified
Development Ordinance," Article 11 'Definitions" Section 11.2 "Defined Terms" of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, regarding Single -Family Residential Parking
Requirements for Platting. Case #ORDA2015-000002 (J. Prochazka) (Note: Final action on this item
is scheduled for the August 27, 2015 City Council meeting - subject to change.)
College Station, TX Page 1 oft Punted on 8/3/2015
powered by Legis[ar—
(*/,,
CITY OF CouF.GE STATION
-y Hom of T. A6M Univsrziy'
i
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 6, 2015
TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Principal Planner
jprochazka@cstx.gov
SUBJECT: UDO Amendment —Single -Family Residential Parking Requirements for
Platting. O R DA2015-000002
Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an
amendment to Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 8 "Subdivision
Design and Improvements," Section 12-8.3 "General Requirements and Minimum
Standards of Design for Subdivisions within the City Limits," Section W "Single -Family
Residential Parking Requirements for Platting," and Chapter 12, "Unified Development
Ordinance," Article 11 "Definitions' Section 11.2 "Defined Terms" of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, regarding Single -Family Residential
Parking Requirements for Platting.
Background: In 2012, the City Council's Strategic Plan identified neighborhood parking
issues as a problem affecting the City's neighborhood integrity. In response, the Joint
Neighborhood Parking Task Force consisting of members of the College Station City
Council and Planning and Zoning Commission was formed through City Council
Resolution. The Task Force created solutions to address neighborhood parking within
three contexts: established neighborhoods with existing problems, established
neighborhoods with emerging problems, and future neighborhoods with potential
problems. City ordinances were adopted based on the report generated by the Task
Force.
Item Summary: "Single -Family Residential Parking Requirements for Platting" is the
section of the Subdivision Regulations that requires new single-family developments to
mitigate potential neighborhood parking problems and maintain certainty of emergency
vehicle access through subdivision design. The ordinance was adopted in 2013 in
response to a report generated by the Joint Neighborhood Parking Task Force in 2012.
Through application of these requirements over the past several years, staff has
identified amendments to make the requirements easier to understand and apply. The
proposed amendments to Section 12-8.3.W. of the Unified Development Ordinance are
intended provide additional options and increased flexibility for single-family
developments. Proposed changes include:
• Ordinance sections have been re -arranged for ease of use,
• An additional option that permits standard 27 -foot wide streets with parking on
one side (and no additional visitor parking) has been added;
• Now allows visitor parking spaces to back on to local streets when two or fewer
spaces are provided in a pod;
• No longer allows on -street parking on narrow streets;
• The traffic calming section has been modified and a definition of "bulb -out' has
been added;
• Right-of-way requirements for wider streets are now defined; and
• Alley -fed parking standards have been clarified / better defined.
Staff met with the Joint Neighborhood Parking Task Force in June to discuss the
proposed changes, and a two week public review period was offered in July to receive
feedback on the amendment. Staff received several comments and/or questions related
to the ordinance amendment and made revisions as necessary.
Attachments:
1) Proposed Ordinance Language
2
Article 8. Subdivision Design and Improvements
Sec. 12-8.3. General Requirements and Minimum Standards of Design for Subdivisions
within the City Limits.
W. Single -Family Residential Parking Requirements for Platting.
1. Purpose.
The purpose of this Section is to establish requirements for new single-family and townhouse
parking to aid in reducing neighborhood parking problems and maintain certainty of access for
emergency vehicles on local streets.
2. General Requirements.
This Section applies to all new single-family and townhouse subdivisions.
a. Each phase of a multi -phase project shall comply with this Section.
b. Subdivisions may utilize multiple Residential Parking Options so long as each phase meets
requirements and all options are listed on the plat.
c. Replats, Amending Plats, Vacating Plats, and Development Plats are exempt from this
section unless new streets are proposed with the subdivision.
d. All "No Parking" areas shall be depicted on the Preliminary Plan.
e. All "No Parking" signs shall be placed along the street to ensure adequate emergency
access. The developer shall provide and install, at no cost to the City, all "No Parking" signs
and associated poles and hardware to the City's specifications.
f. Parking only may be removed on one or both sides of a street upon the City Council
approving an ordinance removing parking from the street.
g. Where on -street or alley parking is utilized in a townhouse subdivision, driveways shall be
designed to allow a minimum of one (1) on -street or alley parking space per four (4) dwelling
units. Driveway layouts shall be provided with the final plat.
Residential Parking Options.
In order to provide adequate access for emergency vehicles, new single-family and townhouse
subdivisions shall provide one option from the following:
a. Wide Streets
1) Pavement width shall be a minimum of thirty-two (32) feet, up to a maximum of thirty-
eight (38) feet.
2) In addition to the right-of-way specified for the Residential Street Section in the B/CS
Unified Design Guidelines, additional right -of -width shall be dedicated equivalent to
the increase in pavement width over twenty-seven (27) feet.
3) In order to minimize adverse traffic impacts on residential neighborhoods, bulb -outs
shall be provided at intersections of local streets. Bulb -outs shall not be required
where a local street intersects a street classified as a collector or greater.
4) As determined by the Development Engineer, engineering judgment shall override
the requirement for bulb -outs set forth in this section if warranted by specific traffic
conditions.
b. Narrow Streets
1) Pavement width shall be a minimum of twenty-two (22) feet, up to a maximum of
twenty-four (24) feet.
2) No parking is allowed on Narrow Streets, so as to ensure emergency vehicle access.
Narrow Streets must meet fire service standards as described in the City of College
Station Site Design Standards.
3) To provide adequate parking in residential neighborhoods, subdivisions choosing to
incorporate narrow streets shall incorporate additional parking spaces through either
the provisions of visitor alley -fed parking areas or visitor parking areas. (See
additional requirements for visitor alley -fed off-street parking and visitor parking
areas below).
c. Standard Streets
1) Standard Streets shall be designed in accordance with the Residential Street Section
in the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines.
2) Parking shall be removed from one or both sides of Standard Streets.
3) To provide adequate parking in residential neighborhoods, subdivisions choosing to
remove parking from both sides of a Standard Street shall incorporate additional
parking spaces through the provisions of Visitor Alley -Fed Off -Street parking or
Visitor Parking Areas. Visitor Alley -Fed Off -Street Parking and Visitor Parking Areas
have additional requirements, as specified below.
d. Wide Lot Frontages
1) All lot widths shall be a minimum of seventy (70) feet, as measured at the front
setback.
e. Visitor Alley -Fed Off -Street Parking
1) Visitor Alley -Fed Off -Street Parking spaces shall be provided at a rate of one (1)
parking space per four (4) dwelling units. Visitor Alley -Fed Off -Street Parking is in
addition to minimum off-street parking requirements. The Off -Street Parking
Standards Section of this UDO lists additional requirements.
2) Off-street parking spaces shall be located in an access easement or private common
area.
f. Visitor Parking Areas
1) Visitor parking shall:
a) be provided at a rate of one (1) parking space per four (4) dwelling units,
b) meet requirements of Off -Street Parking Standards and Access Management
and Circulation sections, except requirements of Alternative Parking Plans, and
except as specifically exempted below,
c) be developed at the same time as public infrastructure,
d) be located no farther than five hundred (500) feet from the lot it is meant to serve.
This distance shall be measured by a walkable route,
e) be located in a common area and maintained by a Homeowners Association,
f) be designed to prohibit backing maneuvers onto public streets, with the
exception that two or fewer parking spaces constructed to single-family driveway
and parking standards are permitted backing maneuvers when accessing a local
street.
g) not be counted towards common open space requirements for Cluster
Developments.
2) Visitor parking areas adjacent to a right-of-way shall be screened from the right-of-
way. Screening is required along one hundred (100) percent of the street frontage
(such as ten (10) shrubs for every thirty (30) linear feet of frontage), with the
exception of areas within the visibility triangle. Screening may be accomplished using
plantings, berms, structural elements, or combinations thereof, and must be a
minimum of three (3) feet above the parking lot pavement elevation. Walls and
planting strips shall be located at least two (2) feet from any parking area. Where the
street and the adjacent site are at different elevations, the Administrator may alter
the height of the screening to ensure adequate screening. Fifty (50) percent of all
shrubs used for screening shall be evergreen. Two or fewer parking spaces
constructed to single-family driveway and parking standards are not required to be
screened from the adjacent right-of-way.
3) Visitor parking areas may be constructed of permeable surfaces as allowed in the
Off -Street Parking Standards.
4. Private parking constructed for the use of subdivision amenities, such as a community pool, may
be counted toward Visitor Parking, if it meets all other requirements listed above and does not
use permeable materials for private parking area surfaces.