Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/22/1966 - Regular Minutes - City Council�Id 0 M THE STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF COLLEGE STATION BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the 22nd day of August, 1966, at 7:00 o'clock P. M., there was begun and holden a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas, at the regular meeting place at the City Hall in College Station, Texas, with Mayor D. A. Anderson presiding and Councilmen Homer Adams, B. J. Cooley, O. M. Holt, R. R. Rhodes, A. P. Boyett and A. L. Rosprim in attendance when the following business came before the Council: Motion was made by Councilman Rhodes and seconded by Councilman O. M. Holt to authorize the Mayor to sign the necessary fencing and utility agreement, contractual W agreement and papers relative to billings to the State for 50-50 reimbursements on U) State Highway 6 from 2.5 miles south of the south City Limits of College Station to a - approximately 1 mile north of the north City Limits of Bryan (except that portion outside the City Limits of College Station). Motion passed unanimous. C� 0 Motion was made by Councilman O. M. Holt and seconded by Councilman Homer M Adams that the City of College Station waive its right to establish values for the procure- ment of right of way on State Highway P from 2.5 miles south of the south City Limits of College Station to approximately 1 mile north of the north City Limits of Bryan (except that portion outside the City Limits of College Station). Motion carried unanimous. `�� aA&—� D. A. Anderson, Mayor Attest&5��-Z'21-x-6e- If @ Asst. City Secretary 0®34. o. ,3,2- MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING August 22, 1966 Members present: Mayor Anderson; Councilmen Holt, Rhodes, Adams, Cooley, Boyett, Rosprim; City Manager Boswell; City Secretary Richardson. Visitors present: H. L. Alsmeyer, Jr., E. S. Swafford, Codie Wells, North B. Bardell. On motion by Councilman Holt, seconded by Councilman Rhodes, and passed, the minutes of the June 27 council meeting were amended to include the Resolution that was passed unanimously by the council concerning Highway 6 east of the city at said meeting. The minutes are to be amended accordingly. On motion by Councilman Rhodes, seconded by Councilman Rosprim, the minutes of the July 25 and July 29 meetings were approved. A public hearing was held on the street paving assessment for Winding Road and Orr Street. There being no discussion, the mayor declared the public hearing closed. On motion by Councilman Holt, seconded by Councilman Boyett, Ordinance No. 477, an ordinance closing a public hearing and ordering assessments was adopted. Motion passed. A contractual agreement with the Texas Highway Department for the right-of-way procure- ment for proposed State Highway 6 east of the city was submitted to the council. Mr. E. S. Swafford of the Texas Highway Department of Bryan discussed the agreement with the council. On motion by Councilman Holt, seconded by Councilman Rhodes, the contractual agreement was adopted by the council. On motion of Councilman Rhodes, seconded by Councilman Holt, the mayor was authorized to sign the necessary fencing and utility agreement, contractual agreement and papers relative to billings to the State for 50-50 reimbursements on State Highway 6 from 2. 5 miles south of the south city limits of College Station to approximately 1 mile north of the north city limits of Bryan (except that portion outside the city limits of College Station). Motion passed unanimously. On motion of Councilman Holt, seconded by Councilman Adams, the City of College Station waived its right to establish values for the procurement of right-of-way on State Highway 6 from 2. 5 miles south of the south city limits of College Station to approximately 1 mile north of the north city limits of Bryan (except that portion outside the city limits of College Station). Motion carried unanimously. On motion by Councilman Adams, seconded by Councilman Cooley, the mayor was authorized to ask the Texas Highway Department to consider an extension of F. M. 60 to proposed State Highway 6 east of the city and that the city pay for the highway right-of-way. On motion by Councilman Holt, seconded by Councilman Boyett, an amendment was made to the motion by Councilman Adams to strike out the sentence, "and the city pay for the highway right-of-way. " The amendment to the motion passed. On motion of Councilman Rhodes, seconded by Councilman Rosprim, the mayor was authorized to ask the Texas Highway Department to consider an extension of F. M. 60 to proposed State Highway 6 east of the city. Motion passed. A communication from Joe G. Hanover, District Engineer, Texas Highway Department, concerning street lights on F. M. 60 and State Highway 308 was submitted to the council. On motion by Councilman Cooley, seconded by Councilman Adams, and passed, the city manager was authorized to place four street lights at the intersection of F. M. 60 and State Highway 308: On motion by Councilman Holt, seconded by Councilman Rosprim, and passed, the council authorized payment of $356. 64 to Clark C. Monroe representing one-third of his consulting fee and actual expenses in connectionwith The Southwestern States Telephone Company franchise. The City of Bryan is to pay= the balance. Bids on electrical supplies were submitted to the council by the city manager. On motion by Councilman Holt, seconded by Councilman Rhodes, and passed, the council accepted the bid from Westinghouse on the basis that it was the lowest bid for electrical supplies. The council heard bids on a garbage truck for the city as submitted by the city manager. On motion by Councilman Boyett, seconded by Councilman Rhodes, and passed, the council accepted the bid from International Harvester in the amount of $6,467. 21. On motion by Councilman Holt, seconded by Councilman Rosprim, and passed, the council authorized payment of $9, 000. 00 on a $37, 000. 00 note with University National Bank and the renewal of a note for $28, 000. 00. On motion by Councilman Adams, seconded by Councilman Cooley, and passed, the city manager was authorized to designate the south side of University Drive from Houston Street west to the U. S. D. A. building as parallel parking. Councilman Cooley discussed the matter of changing the four-hour parking limit on Asbury Street, by the Building and Utilities Department building, to one-hour parking. He related that Mr. Parsons ,6f the Building and Utilities Department gave his consent. On motion by Councilman Cooley, seconded by Councilman Adams, and passed, the council voted to change the first five parking places in front of the Building and Utilities Department building on University Drive east of Asbury Street from four-hour parking to one-hour parking. The council considered asphalting a strip on the north side of University Drive from highway improvement to curb from Cooley's Service Station west to Loupot's Store. On motion by Councilman Holt, seconded by Councilman Rhodes, the city manager was requested to figure the cost of such and determine the possibility of securing property owner participation on the cost. Councilman Adams voted in opposition to motion. Motion passed. The council considered a recommendation of the Park Committee concerning land adjoining College Station Cemetery. On motion by Councilman Boyett, seconded by Councilman Adams, the recommendation was accepted and the mayor was requested to write Mr. Bill Fitch a letter stating that it is not possible to swap city land for land which he owns, and that the Parks Committee is considering this present city acreage in its long range plans. Motion passed. The matter of improving the North Gate parking lot was discussed by the city manager. He gave a status report, reporting that area will soon be ready for parking. The city manager was requested to check into the matter of picking up vehicles that are abandoned on city streets in College Station. The traffic situation at the old circle intersection was discussed with reference to regulation of the flow of traffic at certain hours of the day. The city manager reported that police officers are on duty during peak traffic periods. Councilman Adams reported to the council his meeting with Raymond Nolan and Mr. Kapchinski concerning securing land for the County Road right-of-way. Mr. Kapchinski stated that he was opposed to the extension of County Road through his property. The city manager was requested to investigate the matter of securing necessary right-of-way from another owner and report his findings to the city council. The council discussed the problem of the city council and the school board meetings being held on the same night. Action on changing the date of the city council meeting was postponed pending return to the city of the city attorney. The date of September 20 for a meeting with the Bryan City Commission at Ramada Inn, with the City of College Station as host, was accepted by the council. The mayor was to communi- cate with the mayor of Bryan accordingly. The city manager reported that he had discussed the purchase of property from Mrs. Holick, said property to be used for the right-of-way for the extension of Park Place Street. Mrs. Holick agreed to sell the City of College Station a twenty -foot strip of land for $800. 00, provided she would not be assessed for improving the street abutting her property in the future. The city council authorized the city manager to make a deal with Mrs. Holick on this basis. The council agreed to pay the cost for moving one tree on land of Mr. Meyer that will be acquired for the right-of-way for the extension of Park Place Street. On motion by Councilman Adams, seconded by Councilman Cooley, and passed, the Porterfield bid in amount of $1, 600. 00 for Ashburn creek drainage project north of C. D. Wells property was accepted. The city manager gave a status report to the council on the enforcement of the animal ordinance. The meeting was adjourned subject to call. APPROVED: D. A. Anderson, Mayor ATTEST: C. F. Richardson, City Secretary Texas Highway Department, Forc+3 .D-15-37 Page 1 of 5 'Rev. 10-64 CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT FOR RIGHT OF WAY PROCUREMENT (CITY FORM) STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF TRAVIS I COUNTY Brazos PROJECT 11—?19,17 -/ 13 HIGHWAY State 6 This agreement entered into this 14th of September 1966, by and between the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Highway Department, hereinafter called the State, and College Station, Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized official under Ordinance dated the 22nd day of August, 1966, hereinafter called the City. WHEREAS, the State has deemed it necessary to make certain highway improvements on Highway No. 6 From existing State Highway 6, approximately 1.0 mile north of the North City Limits of Bryan, easterly and southerly approximately 12.9 miles to a connection with the existing location of State Highway 6, approximately 2.5 miles southeast of the South City Limits of College Station (except that portion outside the City Limits of College Station), and which section of highway improvements will necessitate the acquisition of certain right of way, and WHEREAS, it is agreed that such right of way purchase shall be by joint effort of the State and the City; NOW, THEREFORE be it AGREED that acquisition of such right of way shall be in accordance with the terms of this contract. The State hereby authorizes and requests the City of proceed with acquisition and the State agrees to reimburse the City for its share of the cost of such right of way providing such acquisition and reimbursement are accomplished according to the provisions outlined herein and agreed to by both parties hereto. LOCATION SURVEYS AND PREPARATION OF RIGHT OF WAY DATA: The State, without cost to the City, will do the necessary preliminary engineering and title investigation in order to supply to the City the data and instruments necessary to obtain acceptable title to the desired right of way. DETERMINATION OF RIGHT OF WAY VALUES: The City agrees to make a determination of property values for each right of way parcel by methods acceptable to the City and to submit to the State's District Office a tabulation of the values so determined, signed by the appropriate City representative. Such tabulations shall list the parcel numbers, ownership, acreage, and recommended compensation. Compensation shall be shown in the component parts of land taken, itemization of improvements taken, damages, if any, (offset by enhancements, if any), to the remainder, if any, and the amounts the total compensation will be reduced if the owner retains improvements. This tabulation shall be accompanied by an explanation to support the determined values, together with a copy of information or reports used in arriving at all determined values. Such work will be performed by the City at its expense without cost participation by the State. The State will review the data submitted and may base its reimbursement on the values as determed by this review. The.State, however, reserves the right to perform at its own expense any additional investigation deemed necessary, including supplemental appraisal work by State employees or by employment of fee appraisers, all as may be necessary for determination of values to constitute the basis for State reimbursement. 00945 ..35 <.� Form D-15-37 Page 2 of 5 Rev. 10-64 If at any stage of the project development it is determined by mutual agreement between the State and the City that there should be waived the requirement that the City submit to the State property value determinations for any part or all of the required right of way, the City will make appropriate written notice to the State of such waiver, such notice to be acknowledged in writing by the State. In instances of such waiver, the State by its due processes and at its own ex- pense will make a determination of values to constitute the basis for. State reimbursement. -NEGOTIATIONS: The State will notify the City as soon as possible as to the State's, determination of value. Negotiation and settlement with.the property owner will be the responsibility of the City without participation by the State; however, the City will notify the State immediately prior to closing the transaction so that a current title investigation may be made to determine if there has been any change in the title. The City will deliver properly executed deeds which together with any cura- tive instruments found to be necessary as a result of the State's title investiga- .tion will properly vest title in the State for each right of way parcel involved. The costs incidental to negotiation and the costs of recording the right of way instruments will be the responsibility of the City. The cost of title investiga- tion will be the responsibility of the State. CONDEMNATION: Condemnation proceedings will be initiated at a time selected by the City and will be the City's responsibility at its own expense except as hereinafter indicated. The City will obtain from the State without cost current title informa- tion and' engineering data at the time cundeuinaLiun proceedings are Lo be initiated. Except as hereinafter set forth the City will concurrently file condemnation pro- ceedings and a notice of lis pendens for.each case in the name:of,the State, and in each case so filed the judgment of the court will decree title to the property .con- demned in the name of the State. The City will accomplish the legal procedures and, curative matters found to be necessary as a result of the State's title investiga- tion, fulfilling the obligation to properly vest title in the State of, Texas. The City may, as set forth herein under "Excess Takings," and where it is determined to be necessary, enter condemnation proceedings in its own name. Property acquired in the City's name must comply with the requirements set forth in the engineering data and title investigation previously furnished the City by the State at such time as the City conveys said property to the State. COURT COSTS, COSTS OF SPECIAL COMMISSIONERS' HEARINGS AND APPRAISAL EXPENSE: Court costs and costs of Special Commissioners' hearings assessed against the State or City in condemnation proceedings conducted on behalf .of the State and fees incident there- to, will be paid by the City.~ Such costs and fees, with the exception of recording fees, will be eligible for 50 percent State reimbursement.under the established reimbursement procedure provided such costs.and fees are eligible for payment by the State under existing State law. Where the City.uses :the Statc's.appraisers employed on a, fee basis in Special Commissioners' hearings or subsequent appeals, the cost of the appraiser of updating his report, of preparing new reports, preparing for court testimony and appearing in court to testify in.support of his appraisal, will be paid direct by the City, but will be eligible for 50 per cent State reimbursement under _. established reimbursement procedure,pr'ovided prior approval .for such appraiser has been obtained from the State:! The fee paid the appraiser:by the City shall be in accordance with the fee schedule set .fort:h in the.appraiser,'s contract for appraisal services with the State. Y " v If at any stage of the project development it is determined by mutual agreement between the State and the City that there should be waived the requirement that the City submit to the State property value determinations for any part or all of the required right of way, the City will make appropriate written notice to the State of such waiver, such notice to be acknowledged in writing by the State. In instances of such waiver, the State by its due processes and at its own ex- pense will make a determination of values to constitute the basis for. State reimbursement. -NEGOTIATIONS: The State will notify the City as soon as possible as to the State's, determination of value. Negotiation and settlement with.the property owner will be the responsibility of the City without participation by the State; however, the City will notify the State immediately prior to closing the transaction so that a current title investigation may be made to determine if there has been any change in the title. The City will deliver properly executed deeds which together with any cura- tive instruments found to be necessary as a result of the State's title investiga- .tion will properly vest title in the State for each right of way parcel involved. The costs incidental to negotiation and the costs of recording the right of way instruments will be the responsibility of the City. The cost of title investiga- tion will be the responsibility of the State. CONDEMNATION: Condemnation proceedings will be initiated at a time selected by the City and will be the City's responsibility at its own expense except as hereinafter indicated. The City will obtain from the State without cost current title informa- tion and' engineering data at the time cundeuinaLiun proceedings are Lo be initiated. Except as hereinafter set forth the City will concurrently file condemnation pro- ceedings and a notice of lis pendens for.each case in the name:of,the State, and in each case so filed the judgment of the court will decree title to the property .con- demned in the name of the State. The City will accomplish the legal procedures and, curative matters found to be necessary as a result of the State's title investiga- tion, fulfilling the obligation to properly vest title in the State of, Texas. The City may, as set forth herein under "Excess Takings," and where it is determined to be necessary, enter condemnation proceedings in its own name. Property acquired in the City's name must comply with the requirements set forth in the engineering data and title investigation previously furnished the City by the State at such time as the City conveys said property to the State. COURT COSTS, COSTS OF SPECIAL COMMISSIONERS' HEARINGS AND APPRAISAL EXPENSE: Court costs and costs of Special Commissioners' hearings assessed against the State or City in condemnation proceedings conducted on behalf .of the State and fees incident there- to, will be paid by the City.~ Such costs and fees, with the exception of recording fees, will be eligible for 50 percent State reimbursement.under the established reimbursement procedure provided such costs.and fees are eligible for payment by the State under existing State law. Where the City.uses :the Statc's.appraisers employed on a, fee basis in Special Commissioners' hearings or subsequent appeals, the cost of the appraiser of updating his report, of preparing new reports, preparing for court testimony and appearing in court to testify in.support of his appraisal, will be paid direct by the City, but will be eligible for 50 per cent State reimbursement under _. established reimbursement procedure,pr'ovided prior approval .for such appraiser has been obtained from the State:! The fee paid the appraiser:by the City shall be in accordance with the fee schedule set .fort:h in the.appraiser,'s contract for appraisal services with the State. Form D--15-37 Page 3 of 5 Rev. 10-64 EXCESS TAKINGS: In the event the City desires to acquire land in excess of that re- quested by the State for right of way purposes, the State's cost participation will be limited to the property needed for right of way purposes. If the City elects to ac- quire the entire property, including the excess taking, by a single instrument of con- veyance or in one eminent domain proceeding, the property involved will be acquired in the name of the City and that portion requested by the State for right of way will be conveyed to the State. When acquired by negotiation, the State's participation will be based on the State's approved value of that part requested for right of way pur- poses, providing such approved value does not exceed actual payment made by the City. When acquired by condemnation, the Staters participation will be in the proportionate part of the final judgment amount computed on the basis of the relationship of the State's approved value to the Staters predetermined value for the whole property. IMPROVEMENTS: Property owners will be afforded an opportunity in the negotiations to retain any or all of their improvements in the right of way taking. In anticipation of the owner desiring to retain his improvements, the State's approved value will in- clude the amounts by which the upper limit of State participation will be reduced for the retention. It is further agreed that the upper limit for the State's participa- tion in the City's cost for an improved parcel will be reduced as shown in the State's approved value where the owner retains an improvement which is to be moved by either the City or the owner. In the event the improvements which are, in whole or part, a part of the right of way taking are not retained by the owner, title is to be secured in the name of the'State. The State will participate in the acquisition of a structure severed by the right of way line if the part of the house, building or similar struc- ture outside the right of way cannot be reconstructed adequately or there is nothing but salvage left, provided the Staters value is established on this basis and provided title to the entire structure is taken in the name of the State. The State shall dis- pose of all improvements acquired. The net revenue derived by the State from the dis- position of any improvements sold through the Board of Control will be credited to the cost of the right of way procured and shared with the City. RELOCATION OF UTILITIES: If the required right of way encroaches upon an existing utility located on its own right of way and the proposed highway construction requires the adjustment, removal or relocation of the utility facility, the State will estab- lish the necessity for the utility work. State participation in the cost of making the necessary change, less any resulting increase in the value to the utility and less any salvage value obtainable, may be obtained by either the "actual cost" or "lump sum" procedures. Reimbursement under "actual cost" will be made subsequent to the City's certification that the work has been completed and will be made in an amount equal to 50 per cent of the eligible items of cost as paid to the utility owner. The "lump sum" procedure requires that the State establish the eligibility of the utility work and enter into a three party agreement with the owners of the utility facilities and the City which sets forth the exact lump sum amount of reimbursement based on a prior appraisal. The utility will be reimbursed by the City after proper certifica- tion by the utility that the work has been done, said reimbursement to be on the basis of the prior lump sum agreement. The State will reimburse the City in an amount equal to 50 per cent of the firm commitment as paid to the utility owner. The foregoing is subject to the provision that the individual lump sum approved value shall not exceed $20,000, except as specifically approved by the State. In those cases where a single operation is estimated to exceed $20,000, the transaction will be brought to the atten- tion of the State for determination of proper handling based upon the circumstances involved. Such utility firm commitment will be an appropriate item of right of way. The adjustment, removal or relocation of any utility line on publicly owned right of way by sufferance or permit will not be eligible for State reimbursement. The term. "utility" under this contract shall include publicly, privately, and cooperatively owned utilities. Form D-15-37 Page 4 of 5 Rev. 10-64 FENCING REQUIREMENTS: The City may either pay the property owner for his existing right of way fences based on the value such fences contribute to the part taken and damages for an unfenced condition resulting from the right of way taking, in which case the estimated value of such right of way fences and such damages will be in- cluded in the recommended value and the approved value, or the City may do -the fencing on the property ownerts remaining property. Where the City perform right of way fencing as a part of the total right of way consideration,, neither the value of existing right of way fences nor damages for an unfenced condition will be included in the recommended value or the approved value. State participation in the City's cost of constructing right of way fencing on the property owner's remainder may be based either on the actual cost of the fencing or on a predetermined lump sum amount. The State will be given credit for any salvaged fencing material and will not participate in any overhead costs of the City. If State participation is to be requested on the lump sum basis, the State and the City will. reach an agreement prior to the actual accomplishment of work as to the necessity, eligibility, and a firm commitment as to the cost of the entire fencing work to be performed. The foregoing is subject to the provision that the lump sum approved cost shall not exceed $20,000, except as specifically approved by the State. In case the fencing is estimated to exceed $20,000, the transaction will be brought to the attention of the State for determination of proper handling based upon the circumstances involved. REIMBURSEMENT: The State will reimburse the City for right of way acquired after the date of this contract in an amount not to exceed 50 per cent of the cost of the right of way acquired in accordance with the terms and provisions of this agreement. The State's reimbursement will be in the amount of 50 per cent of the Statets predetermined value of each parcel, or the net cost thereof, whichever is the lesser amount. If condemnation is necessary and title is taken as set forth herein under the section headed "Condemnation", the participation by the State shall be based on the final judgment, conditioned that the- State has been notified in writing prior to the filing of such suit and prompt notice: is also given as to all action taken therein. The State shall. have the right to become a party to the suit at any time for all purposes, including the right of appeal at any stage of the proceedings. All other items of cost shall. be borne by the State and the City as provided by other provisions of this agreement. If a lump sum fencing or utility adjustment agreement has been executed the State will reimburse the City in the amount of 50 per cent of the predetermined lump sum cost of the right of way fencing or utility adjustment. If the City prefers not to execute a lump sum agreement for either fencing or utility. adjustments the State will reimburse on the actual most of such adjustments. The City's request for reimbursement will be,supported by a breakdown of the labor, materials and equipment used. GENERAL: It is understood that the terms of this agreement shall apply to new right of way authorized and requested by the Texas highway Department which is needed and not yet dedicated, in use, or previously acquired in the name of the State or City for highway, street, or road purposes. This agreement shall also apply, as to any Form D-15-37 Page 5 of 5 Rev. 10-64 existing right of way, to outstanding property interests xkot previously acquired and to eligible utility adjustments not previously made, as authorized and requested by the Texas Highway Department. It is understood that this contract shall be effective from and after the date of full execution by the State of Texas It is further understood that if unusual circumstances develop in the right of way acquisition which are not clearly covered by the terms of this agreement, such un- usual circumstances or problems will be resolved by mutual agreement between the State and the City. CITY OF COLLEGE STATIO,,N,�,, J , TEXAS BY: (\+v� a ml�al v D. A. AndersonMayor ATTEST: Florence Neelley i/Assistaf'l City Secretary THE STATE OF TEXAS Certified as being executed for the purpose and effect of activating and/or carrying out the orders, es- tablished pol ie or work programs heretofore pod and authorized by the State H h ommission: By Executed as tate Highway Engineer and approved for State Highway Commission. RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Chief EnglneerV Highway Design Right of Way Engineer 00949 5e - NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF COUNCIL OF CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS X COUNTY OF BRAZOS X TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that I hereby call a special meeting of the Council of the City of College Station, Texas, to be held at the City Hall of said City at 7 o'clock P. M. , on the 23rd day of August, 1966, for the purpose of adopting an ordinance author- izing the issuance of revenue bonds of said City. WITNESS MY HAND this 23rd day of August, 1966. ATTEST: City Secretary (SEAL) Mayor, City of College Station, Texas WAIVER AND CONSENT We, the undersigned, members of the Council of the City of College Station, Texas, acknowledge receipt of the above notice, waive any further notice with respect thereto and consent to the holding of the special meeting described in said notice. Bill J. Cooley Homer B. Adams Robt. R. Rhodes O. M. Holt A. L. Rosprim A. P. Boyett 0095® 361 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF COUNCIL OF CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF BRAZOS § TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that I hereby call a special meeting of the Council of the City of College Station, Texas, to be held at the City Hall of said City at 11'X-- o'clock P. M., on the 23rd day of August, 1966, for the purpose of adopting an ordinance authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds of said City. i WITNESS MY HAND this ,2,�0! day of August, 1966. Mayor, City of College Station, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary~� NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF COUNCIL OF CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF BRAZOS § TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that I hereby call a special meeting of the Council of the City of College Station, Texas, to be held at the City Hall of said City at _—_%-- o'clock P. M., on the 23rd day of August, 1966, for the purpose of adopting an ordinance authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds of said City. WITNESS MY HAND this , 3AIday of August, 1966. Mayor, City of College Station, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF COUNCIL OF CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF BRAZOS § TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that I hereby call a special meeting of the Council of the City of College Station, Texas, to be held at the City Hall of said City at ... 7--- o'clock P. M., on the 23rd day of August, 1966, for the purpose of adopting an ordinance authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds of said City. WITNESS MY HAND this ,j'C,,�day of August, 1966. Mayor, City of College Station, Texas ATTEST: ____C__ • _ ___ Gds City Secretary~ I �>