Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09/18/2025 - Regular Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission
College Station, TX Meeting Agenda Planning and Zoning Commission 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840 Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting Meeting ID: 242 663 945 277 | Passcode: ov9Sa9Ed Phone: 833-240-7855 | Phone Conference ID: 960 422 366# The City Council may or may not attend this meeting. September 18, 2025 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers College Station, TX Page 1 Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a thirdparty vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting access and participation will be in-person only. 1. Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. 2. Hear Visitors At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The visitor presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) 3. Consent Agenda All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. Attachments: 1. September 4, 2025 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 5. Regular Agenda 5.1. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to E Estate on approximately 4 acres generally located Page 1 of 414 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 September 18, 2025 at the corner of Yaupon Lane and Bradley Road. Case #REZ2025-000011 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the October 9, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors: Garrett Segraves Attachments: 1. Small Area Map and Aerial 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Background Information 4. Applicant's Supporting Information 5. Existing Future Land Use 6. Rezoning Map 5.2. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from R Rural to GS General Suburban, for approximately 237.65 acres, generally located on Greens Prairie Road, east of the intersection of Greens Prairie Road and W.S. Phillips Parkway. Case #REZ2025-000007 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the October 9, 2025 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Sponsors: Bekha Blasingame Attachments: 1. Aerial and Small Area Map 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Applicant's Supporting Information 4. Background Information 5. Existing Future Land Use Map 6. Rezoning Map 5.3. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2022-4391 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 9.95 acres being 26 lots and a common area within North Forest Estates, Block 1 and 2, generally located along Justin Avenue. Case #REZ2025-000013 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors: Heather Wade Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2022-4391 - Ordinance - 09_22_2022 5.4. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2023-4438 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 27.1 acres being 39 lots within Southwood Phase 21, Block 3 and 4, generally located along Bee Creek Drive and Southwood Drive. Case #REZ2025-000014 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors: Heather Wade Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2023-4438 - Ordinance - 05_25_2023 Page 2 of 414 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 September 18, 2025 5.5. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2023-4466 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 54.56 acres being 20 lots within Southwood Section 1, Block 1 and 2, 13 lots within Southwood Section 2, Block 2, 4 lots within Southwood Section 2A, Block 3, 38 lots within Southwood Section 6,7,9 Block 3, Block 7, Block 8, and 9, 8 lots within Southwood Section 10, Block 1, and 20 lots within Camelot Section 2, Block 1 and 2, generally located between Southwest Parkway and Guadalupe Drive. Case #REZ2025-000015 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors: Heather Wade Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2023-4466 - Ordinance - 09_14_2023 5.6. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2024-4513 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 21.21 acres being 49 lots and a common area within Cat Hollow Phase 1 Subdivision and Glenhaven Estates Phase 8 Subdivision, generally located between Brazoswood Drive and Dominik Drive. Case #REZ2025-000016 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors: Heather Wade Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2024-4513 - Ordinance - 05_13_2024 5.7. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2024-4536 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 118.56 acres being 147 lots within Sweet Briar, College Hills Woodlands, and Woodland Acres subdivisions, generally located between Lincoln Drive and Dominik Drive along Ashburn Avenue. Case #REZ2025-000017 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors: Heather Wade Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2024-4536 - Ordinance - 08_08_2024 5.8. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2024-4541 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban or PDD Planned Development District and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban or PDD Planned Development District for approximately 32.26 acres being 130 lots and common area within Woodcreek Section One Subdivision, save and except Woodcreek Drive from State Highway 6 S to Lake Forest Court S. Case #REZ2025- 000018 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Page 3 of 414 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 September 18, 2025 Sponsors: Heather Wade Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2024-4541 - Ordinance - 08_22_2024 5.9. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2025-4577 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 11.52 acres being 33 lots within Glenhaven Estates Phase 2 Subdivision, save and except Glenhaven Drive, Fernhaven Circle, Francis Circle, and Springhaven Circle, generally located between Brazoswood Drive and Summerglen Drive. Case #REZ2025-000019 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors: Heather Wade Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2025-4577 - Ordinance - 02_27_2025 5.10. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2023-4477 for the property described herein and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MH Middle Housing, R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing and R-4 Multi-Family for 2.85 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 10-19, generally located along Cooner Street. Case #REZ2025-000012 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors: Heather Wade Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2023-4477 - Ordinance - 10_26_2023 5.11. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing in part Ordinance 2024-4542 and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing, provided associated conditions are met, for approximately 3.66 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including portions of Lot 5 and Lot 6 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and subsequent replats of portions of these two lots, within an area generally bounded by Lincoln Avenue, Nimitz Street, and Eisenhower Street. Case #REZ2025-000012 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors: Heather Wade Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. AreaOO_Survey_20240611 3. 2024-4542 - Ordinance - 08_22_2024 5.12. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing, in their entirety, Ordinance 2023-4477, Ordinance 2023-4479, Ordinance 2023-4481, Ordinance 2024-4499, Ordinance 2024-4528, Ordinance 2024-4543, Ordinance 2024-4549, Ordinance 2025-4583, Ordinance 2025-4584, and Ordinance 2025-4585, and amending Appendix A, Page 4 of 414 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 September 18, 2025 Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing for the following twenty-three areas: approximately 1.152 acres at 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, and 110-119 Knox Drive, being Lots 18-27, Block 29 and Lots 12-16, Block 31 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 401, generally located southwest of the intersection of Knox Drive and Old Wellborn Road; approximately 0.412 acres at 418, 420, 422, 424, and 426 Baby Bear Drive, being Lots 1-5, Block 32 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 109, generally located northeast of the intersection of Baby Bear Drive and Towers Parkway; approximately 0.406 acres at 133, 135, 137, 139, and 141 Deacon Drive West, being Lots 1-5, Block 21 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 107, generally located northeast of the intersection of Deacon Drive West and General Parkway; approximately 2.01 acres being The Barracks II Phase 400 Block 36, Lots 27R & 28-40, generally located at the south corner of Tang Cake Drive and Old Wellborn Road; approximately 1.05 acres of the of the D.A. Smith Subdivision recorded in Volume 19506, Page 169, and generally located along Avenue A; approximately 4.66 acres Little-Knight Addition, Lots 1-18, generally located on Aurora Court; approximately 23.62 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Joseph E. Scott league, abstract no. 50, and Crawford Burnett league, abstract no. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including all of the W.M. Sparks Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 139, page 261, and portions of West Park Addition and West Park 2nd Addition as described by plats recorded in volume 102, page 198 and volume 128, page 574, respectively, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, as well as subsequent replats of portions of these subdivisions in an area generally bounded by Luther Street, Montclair Avenue, Grove Street, and Maryem Street; approximately 8.15 acres being Pecan Tree Estates Phase One Subdivision and Pecan Tree Estates Phase Two Subdivision, save and except 0.687 acres labeled "park," generally located along Oney Hervey Drive; approximately 4.6 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 20- 30, Block 5, Lots 1-8, generally located along Cooner Street; approximately 5.4 acres being College Vista, Block E, Lots 1-14, Block F, Lots 1-10, Block G, Lots 1-5, Block H Lots 1-3, 4R- 5R, and 6-7, generally located along Live Oak Street and Ash Street; approximately 2.02 acres being Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lots 1-16 and 17R, generally located along Lincoln Avenue; approximately 5.11 acres being University Oaks Phase 2, Block 5, Lots 1-13, 14R1- 14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21-23, 24A1-24A2, and 25R, generally located at along Dominik Drive; approximately 4.12 acres being Timber Ridge Addition Phase 1, Block 2, Lots 13-24, Block 3, Lots 12-22, generally located along University Oaks Blvd; approximately 1.10 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being a portion of Lot 12 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and the northeast half (approximate) of the adjoining right-of-way of Turner Street , generally for the properties located along Gilbert Street and Turner Street; 0.23 of an acre being all of a called 0.13 acre tract recorded in Volume 13901, Page 36 OPRBCT and all of a tract of land called to be Lot 27 of Pasler Addition recorded in Volume 18475, Page 202 OPRBCT Richard Carter League Survey, Abstract, generally located along Turner Street; approximately 12.85 acres being The Barracks II Phase 111 Subdivision, and The Barracks II Phase 112, Block 38, Lots 1-24, Block 39, Lots 1-10, Common Area 13 and Parkland 12, generally bounded by Towers Parkway, Goldilocks Lane, and Cain Road; approximately 18.83 acres being Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 Subdivision, Volume 14370, Page 149, and Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 2A Subdivision, generally bounded by Deacon Drive W, Towers Parkway, Oak Crest, and Holleman Drive S; approximately 6.71 acres being Parkway Plaza Phase 5, Block 1, Lots 1-15, Block 2, Lots 1- 12, generally located on Pine Ridge Dr.; approximately 55.49 acres being The Page 5 of 414 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 6 September 18, 2025 Barracks Phase 1 Subdivision, The Barracks Phase 2 Subdivision, Williamsgate Phase 1 Subdivision, Buena Vida Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 1 Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 2 Subdivision, and 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Rock Prairie Road W, Towers Parkway, Deacon Drive W, and General Parkway; approximately 28.4 acres being University Heights Phase 1 Subdivision, save and except Common Area 4, and University Heights Phase 2 and 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Paloma Ridge Drive, Feather Run, Davidson Drive, and Holleman Drive South; approximately 8.8 acres being Las Palomas Subdivision, generally bounded by Abbate Road, Feather Run, Kenyon Drive, and Holleman Drive South; approximately 28.14 acres all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Morgan Rector league, abstract no. 46, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including portions of the Richards Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 137, page 25 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and subsequent replats of portions of it, and generally being the majority of the properties which front on Richards Street, Crest Street and Sterling Street; approximately 19.34 acres being Autumn Chase, Block 1, Lots 1-7, Brentwood Section Two, Block 4, Lots 1-30, Block 5, Lots 1-23, Block 6, Lots 1-4, and Brentwood Section Three Subdivision, generally located along Cornell Dr., Brentwood Dr., and Southwest Pkwy; and approximately 5.8 acres being Ashford Square Subdivision Replat, volume 3202, page 61, generally located along Ashford Dr. Case #REZ2025-000012 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors: Heather Wade Attachments: 1. 2023-4477 - Ordinance - 10_26_2023 2. 2023-4479 - Ordinance - 10_26_2023 3. 2023-4481 - Ordinance - 10_26_2023 4. 2024-4499 - Ordinance - 01_25_2024 5. 2024-4528 - Ordinance - 07_08_2024 6. 2024-4543 - Ordinance - 08_22_2024 7. 2024-4549 - Ordinance - 09_12_2024 8. 2025-4583 - Ordinance - 03_27_2025 9. 2025-4584 - Ordinance - 03_27_2025 10. 2025-4585 - Ordinance - 03_27_2025 11. Rezoning Map_I_UNIVERSITY_OAKS_BLVD 12. Rezoning Map_J_AURORA_CT 13. Rezoning Map_Y_GROVE_MARYEM_LUTHER_MONTCLAIR 14. Rezoning Map_B2_COONER_ST 15. Rezoning Map_D_LIVE_OAK_ST_ASH_ST 16. Rezoning Map_E_LINCOLN_AVE 17. Rezoning Map_F_G_H_DOMINIK_DR 18. Rezoning Map_M_PINE_RIDGE_DR 19. Rezoning Map_PQRST_CORNELL_DR 20. Rezoning Map_W_ASHFORD_DR 21. Rezoning Map_Z_ONEY_HERVEY_DR 22. Rezoning Map_II_PALOMA_RIDGE_DR 23. Rezoning Map_HH_KENYON_DR 24. Rezoning Map_JJ_KK_CAIN_RD 25. Rezoning Map_BARRACKS_DEACON_DR 26. Rezoning Map_AVENUE_A 27. Rezoning Map_SS_TURNER_ST 28. AreaSS_Survey_20240624 Page 6 of 414 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 7 September 18, 2025 29. Rezoning Map_TANG_CAKE_DR 30. Rezoning Map_O_RICHARDS 31. AreaO_Survey_20240610 32. Rezoning Map_701_703_TURNER_ST 33. 701 703 Turner St survey 34. Rezoning Map_BARRACKS_KNOX_DR 35. Rezoning Map_BARRACKS_BABY_BEAR_DR 36. Rezoning Map_LL_PAPA_BEAR_MOMMA_BEAR_DR 37. Rezoning Map _MM_KEEFER_LP 5.13. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 2, “Development Review Bodies,” Section 2.2, “Planning and Zoning Commission,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, regarding the removal of the Planning and Zoning Commission’s designation as the Impact Fee Advisory Committee. Case #ORDA2025-000008. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 25, 2025 City Council Meeting – subject to change.) Sponsors: Carol Cotter Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance Amendment - Planning and Zoning Commission 2. Section 2.2. Planning and Zoning Commission Red Lines 5.14. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Evaluation & Appraisal Report and associated appendices. Sponsors: Christine Leal Attachments: 1. Comprehensive Plan 5-Yr Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2025 2. Appendix A - 2024 Existing Conditions Report 3. Appendix B - Implementation Progress Report 4. Appendix C - Engagement Report 6. Informational Agenda 6.1. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev 6.2. Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, September 25, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 2, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 9, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 16, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. 6.3. Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board. • None 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. Page 7 of 414 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 8 September 18, 2025 A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 8. Adjourn. The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on September 11, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 8 of 414 September 4, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 3 Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting September 4, 2025 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson Jason Cornelius, Commissioners Aron Collins, Tre Watson, and Michael Buckley COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioners Warren Finch, Marcus Chaloupka, and David Higdon CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Planning & Development Anthony Armstrong, City Engineer Carol Cotter, Long Range Planning Administrator Christine Leal, Principal Planner Heather Wade, Deputy City Attorney Leslie Whitten, Administrative Support Specialist Kristen Hejny, Technology Services Specialist Roxanna Duran 1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. Chairperson Cornelius called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Hear Visitors No visitors spoke. 3. Consent Agenda 3.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. • July 17, 2025 Commissioner Watson moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Commissioner Collins seconded the motion, the motion passed 4-0. 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. 5. Regular Agenda 5.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 11 “Definitions”, Section 11.2 “Defined Terms” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by amending certain sections regarding the definition of family. Case #ORDA2025-000006 Page 9 of 414 September 4, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 3 5.2 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 1 “General Provisions”, Section 1.10 “Transitional Provisions,” Article 3 “Development Review Procedures”, Section 3.4 “Official Zoning Map Amendments (Rezonings),” Article 4 “Zoning Districts”, Section 4.1 “Establishment of Districts,” Article 5 “District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards”, Section 5.10 “Overlay Districts” and Section 5.11 “Single-Family Overlay Districts,” and Article 6 “Use Regulations”, Section 6.3 “Types of Use” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by amending certain sections regarding the ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay zoning district and HOO High Occupancy Overlay zoning district. Case #ORDA2025-000007 Presentations, discussions, and public hearings on agenda items on #5.1 and #5.2 were held together. Principal Planner Wade presented the ordinance amendments to the Commission recommending approval of both. Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing for agenda items #5.1 and #5.2. David Lees, 906 Leighton Lane, Bryan, asked for more clarification on the items. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing for agenda items #5.1 and #5.2. Commissioner Collins moved to recommend approval of the agenda item #5.1. Commissioner Buckley seconded the motion, the motion was approved 4-0. Commissioner Collins moved to recommend approval of the agenda item #5.2. Commissioner Buckley seconded the motion, the motion was approved 4-0. 6. Informational Agenda 6.1 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board. There was no discussion. 6.2 Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: • A request for a comprehensive plan amendment on approximately five acres of land generally located south of the intersection of University Drive East and East Crest Drive. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 17, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 14, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request with a smaller acreage. • A request for a rezoning on approximately 38.24 acres of land generally located south of the intersection of University Drive East and East Crest Drive. The Page 10 of 414 September 4, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 3 Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 17, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval of the rezoning with the condition that the "panhandle" area be removed. The City Council heard this item on August 14, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request removing the "panhandle" area and creating a buffer area. Director Armstrong gave a brief update on the rezoning and comprehensive plan amendments. 6.3 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, September 11, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, September 18, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, September 25, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 2, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. There was no discussion. 6.4 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. There was no discussion. 8. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 6:12 p.m. Approved: Attest: __________________________________ _________________________________ Jason Cornelius, Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Board Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services Page 11 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.1. Moreau Tract Rezoning Sponsor: Garrett Segraves, Staff Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to E Estate on approximately 4 acres generally located at the corner of Yaupon Lane and Bradley Road. Case #REZ2025-000011 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the October 9, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Diverse Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. Summary: This request is to rezone 4.073 acres of land located at the corner of Yaupon Lane and Bradley Road, from R Rural to E Estate. The property is currently undeveloped, but the current owner plans to subdivide the property for use by his family. The rezoning intends to increase the marketability of the property and to allow for future development. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the subject property and all surrounding properties as Estate Residential. The Comprehensive Plan generally describes the Estate Residential land use designation as follows: Areas that have a low level of development activities. These areas are appropriate for very low- density residential lots of one-acre or greater lot sizes or average 20,000 square feet lots when clustered around open space. The intent of the district is to: • Support a wide range of lot sizes, long blocks, and curvilinear streets. • When establishing new residential areas or expanding existing developments, provide pedestrian and vehicular connectivity between adjacent developments. The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within the Estate Residential land use include: E Estate, R Rural, and MHP Manufactured Home Park. The proposed zoning district of E Estate would be in line with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The property has frontage to Bradley Road, which is classified as a Private Street and is not on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. All adjacent properties are zoned R Rural and are currently developed as Page 12 of 414 large single-family lots. The E Estate zoning district is designed to provide land for low-density single-family lots. The proposed zoning district is appropriate for the surrounding area as it would allow for the development of large-lot single-family homes. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The size and location of the subject property are suitable for uses allowed within the proposed zoning district. The site has adequate space to meet the minimal dimensional standards for E Estate. There is no floodplain on the property. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of this development. Detention is required in accordance with the BCS guidelines. Drainage and any other infrastructure required for the site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject property has frontage to Bradley Road, which is designated as a private street and is not on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. 5. The marketability of the property: Rezoning the property from R Rural to E Estate would allow the lot to be subdivided, providing additional residential lots, making the property more marketable. Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Small Area Map and Aerial 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Background Information 4. Applicant's Supporting Information 5. Existing Future Land Use 6. Rezoning Map Page 13 of 414 BRADLEY ROAD YAUPON LANEYAUPO N L A N E 4.073 ACRES RURAL (R) TO ESTATE (E) REZONING EXHIBIT MOREAU TRACT 4.073 ACRES EXISTING ZONING: RURAL (R) PROPOSED ZONING: ESTATE (E) THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE SURVEY, A-9 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS SCALE: 1"=40' AUGUST 2025 SURVEYOR: David Powell Brister, RPLS No. 6537 Kerr Surveying, LLC 1718 Briarcrest Dr. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 KERR JOB 25-0869 TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER:OWNERS/DEVELOPERS: Chuck Moreau 2737 Cloisters Drive College Station, Texas, 77845 (979)218-8835 ORIGINAL ZONING LEGEND PROPOSED ZONING VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE BRADLEY ROADYAUPON LAN E HARRIS DRIVE ROCK P R A I R I E R O A D RURAL P:\25-352 Moreau Tract - Minor Replat - Documents\REZONING\25-352 REZONING MAP.dwg, Layout1Page 16 of 414 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 18, 2025 Advertised Council Hearing Date: October 9, 2025 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Carter Lake Home Owners Corporation Property owner notices mailed: 14 Contacts in support: None at the time of this report Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Estate Residential R Rural Single-Family Residential South Estate Residential R Rural Bradley Rd (Private Street)/Undeveloped East Estate Residential R Rural Single-Family Residential/Undeveloped West Estate Residential R Rural Single-Family Residential/Undeveloped DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: March 2008 Zoning: R Rural (2008) Final Plat: Unplatted Site development: Undeveloped Page 17 of 414 Name of Project:MOREAU TRACT MINOR REPLAT REZONING (REZ2025-000011) Address: Legal Description:A000901, THOMAS CARRUTHERS (ICL), TRACT 56, 4.0791 ACRES Total Acreage:4.08 Applicant:: Property Owner:Charles M. and Suzanne Moreau SCHULTZ ENGINEERING List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. Increased demand for single family detached housing. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. This zone change is in accordance with the comprehensive plan. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The use permitted by the current zoning would be for only one residential lot. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The use permitted by the rezoning would be for two estate lots. REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 Page 18 of 414 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The use permitted by the rezoning would be for two estate lots. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The use permitted by the current zoning would be for a single residential lot. It would be marketable but not as much as 2 residential lots would be. List any other reasons to support this zone change. The owner would like to subdivide the property for use by his family. Page 2 of 2 Page 19 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.2. The Windham Tract Rezoning Sponsor: Bekha Blasingame, Staff Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from R Rural to GS General Suburban, for approximately 237.65 acres, generally located on Greens Prairie Road, east of the intersection of Greens Prairie Road and W.S. Phillips Parkway. Case #REZ2025-000007 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the October 9, 2025 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Relationship to Strategic Goals: Diverse & Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval. Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 237.65 acres of land, generally located on Greens Prairie Rd east of the intersection of Greens Prairie Rd and WS Phillips Pkwy, from R Rural to GS General Suburban. The tract proposed to be rezoned consists of an unplatted property and is currently undeveloped. The intent of the rezoning is to build a residential subdivision consisting of approximately 800 lots. The property was annexed in 2002 and was automatically assigned the zoning district of R Rural. Though the zoning district of R Rural allows for the use of single-family homes, it requires a much larger lot area and requires larger dimensional standards. This zoning request is in effort to allow the applicant to develop the property to the smaller standards of GS General Suburban. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the subject property as Suburban Residential. The Comprehensive Plan generally describes the Suburban Residential land use designation as follows: Single family residential areas that consist of low to moderate single family lots. These areas may also include limited townhomes, duplexes, other housing types, and some non-residential uses that are compatible with surrounding single-family areas. Development types tend to be highly consistent with a subdivision or neighborhood. The intent of the district is to: o Encourage community facilities, parks, and greenways within neighborhoods o Accommodate streetscape features such as sidewalks, street trees, and lighting o Support neighborhoods with a mix of housing types o When establishing new residential areas or expanding existing developments, provide pedestrian and vehicular connectivity between adjacent developments Page 22 of 414 The zoning districts that are generally appropriate for within the Suburban Residential land use include: RS Restricted Suburban and GS General Suburban. The goal of Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Plan is to have viable and attractive neighborhoods that maintain long-term neighborhood integrity while collectively providing a wide range of housing options and other services for a diverse population. Chapter 3 states that new neighborhoods should be designed to fit within the existing fabric of the community and complement the natural environment. Sustainable neighborhoods should be developed with integrated parks that are easily and safely reached on foot or bicycle. Development policies should encourage the clustering of homes to reduce the environmental impacts on sensitive areas like floodplain. The proposed rezoning request from R Rural to GS General Suburban aligns with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The property has frontage to Greens Prairie Rd. Adjacent properties are zoned PDD Planned Development District to the north and northeast, RS Restricted Suburban to the east, R Rural to the southeast, the City of College Station’s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction to the south, and GS General Suburban to the west. There are smaller sections with frontage to Greens Prairie Rd to the west and northwest that are not a part of this rezoning request that will remain zoned R Rural. The adjacent properties to the north, east, and west are currently developed as residential subdivisions. The property to the northeast of the subject property and the smaller areas along Greens Prairie Rd are currently undeveloped. The properties to the south are located in the City’s ETJ. The GS General Suburban zoning district is intended to provide for single-family residential purposes and accessory uses and to accommodate sufficient, suitable residential neighborhoods, protected and/or buffered from incompatible uses, and provide the necessary and adequate facilities and services. The proposed zoning district is appropriate for the surrounding area as it would continue the use of suburban residential subdivisions. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The size and location of the subject property is suitable for uses allowed within the proposed zoning district. The site has adequate space to meet the minimal dimensional standards for GS General Suburban. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the future extension needs of this development. The design of extensions to the City's Water and Wastewater systems will be reviewed with platting of the tract. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject property is generally located on Greens Prairie Rd. Right of Way alignments Page 23 of 414 and dedications would be determined during the preliminary plan. The subject tract has frontage on Greens Prairie Road and the future extension of W.S. Phillips Parkway and Oldham Oaks Avenue. W.S. Phillips Parkway has a thoroughfare classification of minor arterial, and Oldham Oaks Avenue is listed as a minor collector. Both will be extended with the platting of the tract and eventually intersect on the southeastern edge of the development. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) has been completed with this project with a total build out estimated for 2035. The site’s assumed trip generation and traffic mitigation recommendations outlined in the TIA will be fulfilled as buildout happens. 5. The marketability of the property: The existing zoning of R Rural does not comply with the Future Land Use of Suburban Residential and the applicant states the current zoning is not suitable for the type of development the City intends for this area. However, the proposed zoning district would allow for greater density of single family homes, making it more marketable. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Aerial and Small Area Map 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Applicant's Supporting Information 4. Background Information 5. Existing Future Land Use Map 6. Rezoning Map Page 24 of 414 Page 25 of 414 Page 26 of 414 GREENS PRAIRIE RDOLDHAM OAKS AVECAS T L E G A T E D R S W E E T W A T E R D R W O O D L A K E D R C A L U M E T T R L W S P H I L L I P S P A R K W A Y Keough Bonnie B Windham Jerry P & Patricia Windham Jerry P & Patricia Windham Jerry P & Patricia C o l l e g e S t a t i o n C i t y L i m i t s C o l l e g e S t a t i o n E T J Co l l e g e S t a t i o n C i t y L i m i t s Co l l e g e S t a t i o n E T J PRESENT ZONING: GENERAL SUBURBAN PRESENT ZONING: RESTRICTED SUBURBAN PRESENT ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PRESENT ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PRESENT ZONING: R - RURAL PRESENT ZONING: R - RURAL PROPOSED ZONING: GS - GENERAL SUBURBAN COLLEGE STATION EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION PRESENT ZONING: R - RURAL PRESENT ZONING: R - RURAL PRESENT ZONING: R - RURALGREENS PRAIRIE RDOLDHAM OAKS AVECAS T L E G A T E D R S W E E T W A T E R D R W O O D L A K E D R W S P H I L L I P S P A R K W A Y Keough Bonnie B Windham Jerry P & Patricia Windham Jerry P & Patricia Windham Jerry P & Patricia C o l l e g e S t a t i o n C i t y L i m i t s C o l l e g e S t a t i o n E T J Co l l e g e S t a t i o n C i t y L i m i t s Co l l e g e S t a t i o n E T J PRESENT ZONING: GENERAL SUBURBAN PRESENT ZONING: RESTRICTED SUBURBAN PRESENT ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PRESENT ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PRESENT ZONING: R - RURAL PRESENT ZONING: R - RURAL PROPOSED ZONING: GS - GENERAL SUBURBAN COLLEGE STATION EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION PRESENT ZONING: R - RURAL PRESENT ZONING: R - RURAL PRESENT ZONING: R - RURAL M ETA PLA N N I N G + DESIGN©2025, ALL RIGHTS R E S E R V E D META PL A N NING + DESI G N THIS DRAWING IS A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION FOR PRESENTATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT FOR COMPUTATION OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. SAID DRAWING IS A SCANNED IMAGE ONLY AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. META PLANNING + DESIGN MAY OR MAY NOT INTEGRATE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHER CONSULTANTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE TOPICS OF ENGINEERING AND DRAINAGE, FLOODPLAINS, AND/OR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AS THEY RELATE TO THIS DRAWING. NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, CONCERNING THE PHYSICAL DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CHARACTER OF THE FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE INTENDED. ADDITIONALLY, NO WARRANTY IS MADE TO THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. © 2025 META PLANNING + DESIGN, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED HOU-21044 AUGUST 27, 2025 SCALE 0 600300150 a zoning exhibit for prepared for WINDHAM RANCH ±237.6 ACRES OF LAND BINNACLE DEVELOPMENT 24285 Katy Freeway, Ste. 525 Katy, Texas 77494 Tel: 281-810-1422 NN Page 27 of 414 Page 1 of 2 REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION WINDHAM TRACT PDD (REZ2025-000007) Name of Project: Address: Legal Description: A007101, J BLEDSOE (ICL), TRACT 1, 227.98 ACRES, & A010100 WM CLARK Total Acreage: 237.6 Applicant:: META PLANNING & DESIGN Property Owner: WINDHAM JERRY P & PATRICIA List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The tract is currently vacant and proposes residential development with a variety of lot widths. The variation in lot width will allow for a range of homes at different prices points, appealing to more buyers in the housing market. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. This rezoning request is in compliance with the College Station Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use and Character map calls for this area to be Suburban Residential, which General Suburban zoning complies with. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? Residential is suitable for this tract as the Comprehensive Plan calls for residential in this area. Suburban, large lot and PDD residential are immediately adjacent to this rezoning request. As this project is proposing solely single-family residential within the project boundary, it will conform to nearby uses. The project also proposes to extend pedestrian improvements that currently exist in nearby neighborhoods. Page 28 of 414 Page 2 of 2 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The proposed General Suburban zoning will serve as a transition from the PDD to the north, large lot residential (within ETJ) to the south, and Restricted Suburban to the east. General Suburban zoning exists to the west of the tract. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The current zoning district, Rural (R), does not allow for suburban type residential development as called for by the Future Land Use and Character map. The current zoning is not suitable for the type of development the City intends for this area. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The frontage on Greens Prairie Road, which provides quick and direct access to William Fitch and Highway 6, along with the variety of lots widths make this a marketable area for new residential development. List any other reasons to support this zone change. New housing stock for College Station, improved drainage in the immediate area, and compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Page 29 of 414 NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 18, 2025 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: October 9, 2025 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Castlegate Castlegate II Greens Prairie Reserve Sweetwater Sweetwater Forest Property owner notices mailed: 43 Other contacts in support (as of September 18, 2025): 1 Other contacts in opposition (as of September 18, 2025): 0 Inquiry contacts (as of September 18, 2025): 1 ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Suburban Residential, and Natural & Open Areas Planned Development District (PDD) Suburban Residential Development East Suburban Residential, and Natural & Open Areas Restricted Suburban (RS) Suburban Residential Development South Suburban Residential, Estate Residential, and Natural & Open Areas City of College Station’s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) Suburban Residential Development West Suburban Residential, Natural & Open Areas, Parks & Greenways Rural (R), General Suburban (GS) Greens Prairie Rd (minor arterial) and Suburban Residential Development DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 2002 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open Space upon annexation A-O Agricultural Open space renamed to R Rural (2013) Final Plat: The property is currently unplatted. Site development: The property is currently undeveloped. Page 30 of 414 Page 31 of 414 Page 32 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.3. Case #REZ2025-000013 Sponsor: Heather Wade, Principal Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2022-4391 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 9.95 acres being 26 lots and a common area within North Forest Estates, Block 1 and 2, generally located along Justin Avenue. Case #REZ2025-000013 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this city-initiated rezoning as it is required for compliance with state law. Summary: This is a city-initiated rezoning of approximately 9.95 acres generally located along Justin Avenue within North Forest Estates from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban. This rezoning is in effort to comply with state law (Senate Bill 1567). Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2022-4391 - Ordinance - 09_22_2022 Page 33 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-4391 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2, “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 9.86 ACRES, BEING 26 LOTS WITHIN THE NORTH FOREST ESTATES SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 35 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-4391 Page 2 of 3 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 22nd day of September, 2022. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 36 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-4391 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit A That Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended and is to read as follows: The following property is rezoned to apply a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay zoning as provided in Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 5 “District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards”, Section 5.11 “Single-Family Overlay Districts”: Page 37 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.4. Case #REZ2025-000014 Sponsor: Heather Wade, Principal Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2023-4438 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 27.1 acres being 39 lots within Southwood Phase 21, Block 3 and 4, generally located along Bee Creek Drive and Southwood Drive. Case #REZ2025-000014 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this city-initiated rezoning as it is required for compliance with state law. Summary: This is a city-initiated rezoning of approximately 27.1 acres generally located along Bee Creek Drive and Southwood Drive from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban. This rezoning is in effort to comply with state law (Senate Bill 1567). Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2023-4438 - Ordinance - 05_25_2023 Page 38 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4438 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2, “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 27.1 ACRES, BEING 39 LOTS WITHIN SOUTHWOOD PHASE 21, BLOCKS 3-6 AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 40 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4438 Page 2 of 4 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 25th day of May, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 41 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4438 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit A That Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended and is to read as follows: The following properties are rezoned to apply a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay zoning as provided in Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 5 “District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards”, Section 5.11 “Single-Family Overlay Districts”: Approximately 27.1 acres, being 39 lots within Southwood Phase 21, Blocks 3-6 Page 42 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4438 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B Page 43 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.5. Case #REZ2025-000015 Sponsor: Heather Wade, Principal Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2023-4466 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 54.56 acres being 20 lots within Southwood Section 1, Block 1 and 2, 13 lots within Southwood Section 2, Block 2, 4 lots within Southwood Section 2A, Block 3, 38 lots within Southwood Section 6,7,9 Block 3, Block 7, Block 8, and 9, 8 lots within Southwood Section 10, Block 1, and 20 lots within Camelot Section 2, Block 1 and 2, generally located between Southwest Parkway and Guadalupe Drive. Case #REZ2025-000015 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this city-initiated rezoning as it is required for compliance with state law. Summary: This is a city-initiated rezoning of approximately 54.56 acres generally located between Southwest Parkway and Guadalupe Drive from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban. This rezoning is in effort to comply with state law (Senate Bill 1567). Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2023-4466 - Ordinance - 09_14_2023 Page 44 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4466 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2, “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 48.31 ACRES, BEING 103 LOTS WITHIN SOUTHWOOD SUBDIVISIONS SECTIONS 1, 2, 2A, 6, 7, 9, AND 10; AND CAMELOT ADDITION SECTION 2 SUBDIVSION DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 46 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4466 Page 2 of 4 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 14th day of September, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 47 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4466 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit A That Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended and is to read as follows: The following properties are rezoned to apply a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay zoning as provided in Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 5 “District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards”, Section 5.11 “Single-Family Overlay Districts”: Approximately 48.31 acres of land, being 103 lots within Southwood Subdivisions Sections 1, 2, 2A, 6, 7, 9 and 10 and Camelot Addition Section 2 Subdivision. Page 48 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4466 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B Page 49 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.6. Case #REZ2025-000016 Sponsor: Heather Wade, Principal Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2024-4513 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 21.21 acres being 49 lots and a common area within Cat Hollow Phase 1 Subdivision and Glenhaven Estates Phase 8 Subdivision, generally located between Brazoswood Drive and Dominik Drive. Case #REZ2025-000016 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this city-initiated rezoning as it is required for compliance with state law. Summary: This is a city-initiated rezoning of approximately 21.21 acres generally located between Brazoswood Drive and Dominik Drive from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban. This rezoning is in effort to comply with state law (Senate Bill 1567). Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2024-4513 - Ordinance - 05_13_2024 Page 50 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4513 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2, “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 21.15 ACRES BEING 49 LOTS AND A COMMON AREA WITHIN CAT HOLLOW PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION AND GLENHAVEN ESTATES PHASE 8 SUBDIVISION DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 52 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4513 Page 2 of 4 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 13th day of May, 2024. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 53 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4513 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit A That Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended and is to read as follows: The following properties are rezoned to apply a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay zoning as provided in Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 5 “District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards”, Section 5.11 “Single-Family Overlay Districts”: Approximately 21.15 acres of land, being 49 lots and a common area within Cat Hollow Phase 1 Subdivision and Glenhaven Estates Phase 8 Subdivision. Page 54 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4513 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B Page 55 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.7. Case #REZ2025-000017 Sponsor: Heather Wade, Principal Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2024-4536 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 118.56 acres being 147 lots within Sweet Briar, College Hills Woodlands, and Woodland Acres subdivisions, generally located between Lincoln Drive and Dominik Drive along Ashburn Avenue. Case #REZ2025-000017 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this city-initiated rezoning as it is required for compliance with state law. Summary: This is a city-initiated rezoning of approximately 118.56 acres generally located between Lincoln Drive and Dominik Drive along Ashburn Avenue from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban. This rezoning is in effort to comply with state law (Senate Bill 1567). Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2024-4536 - Ordinance - 08_08_2024 Page 56 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4536 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," ARTICLE 4 "ZONING DISTRICTS," SECTION 4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 117 ACRES BEING 147 LOTS WITHIN SWEET BRIAR ADDITION, WOOLDAND ACRES, AND COLLEGE HILLS WOODLANDS SUBDIVISIONS AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances ofthe City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision ofthis Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 58 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4536 Page 2 of 8 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 8' day of August, 2024. ATTEST: Qtf/m1.4_ City Secretary APPROVED: City Attorney APP OVED: iM orY Page 59 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4536 Page 3 of 8 Exhibit A That Appendix A, "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4, "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended and is to read as follows: The following properties are rezoned to apply a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay zoning as provided in Appendix A, "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 5 "District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards", Section 5.11 "Single -Family Overlay Districts": Approximately 117 acres of land, being 147 lots within Sweet Briar Addition, Woodland Acres, and College Hills Woodlands Subdivisions. Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Page 60 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4536 Page 4 of 8 00 leo j+14 ro..1 Pi 0 LA8 o LS & or Ncu^${n aurora 3. Wie. S0Ili Developer T. .3.. Kunsan! Lgglserr lay 1140 001.34. S atffla, Thxa9 arm Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Page 61 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4536 Page 5 of 8 Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Page 62 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4536 Page 6 of 8 IT Li rie a p, 71.. 5 Si'r - a — - . . t• .'-... 1":.' , .7. ..• , . 1-... i . I r r 1 I d-C ,443 oi: Id.. - T J•...... 101. 1.al.1e7 T' TT - -Flab 7. II UM I r TIM= 'FDA -1.7c-r.: Y:ryr-r..r, 'Ma DLI.tLi 11ZU:. crYJri, J. _ LTJ! Sak•irEr_ Tlpa, . = id] Urp r1]arx ti7:J•. ;.TJ-71. mills. aD7 L.117atr 11a mud !4 4. rcddo:1` ar u a.raa Mr twigF ]ari• J5t SrrJ, 1 a.t.d la LAN RL k .t Gartt to Uri 1-7 F rrar i..I.q mcgrigJo #9 .1121 .:9P?ar ntios } lord ar •Si,. .fi . :doughy; • w .. LaA1•111': ilk b a . L. trij LP mil. 101. jep !1.:. y{rJrii r Trris'r r5AorI 1-e!.re i he tier* -0•84 r era r- uu]...r :Ai drtI tr' =Li vti J11; may, sdrdse lb .rot d. So Lot. 7a Auld Ydd b.I. 11a1334.yfat ILr.yLI .,.: r_,ayr Lt LI1i 1d57 IL Lid SIM Ltr i5., rL1.a-jra an8 animapr.rrcr rlidin. dad. direribid ID r op ar KIT I`It IN tit NM arr EL; aad rpd# r Nil tame. SDI. ID. DL:_ urr- r' ma`r• r, i r is.Los, do iQ LEr.li 111 tui! L'!`:41.rh iI'r J•f rt,l, . i.D.c• k.-fir kopi. Pinta. '-N1mLa a d+MaIrr LEIS. i,1d srilEJ. I_111)11 i *r:aazam r s r-r fora an a Id pay Aro Impursdr.7ratms. .6= LL. oii &L la* isaraLLC. 6.A..id JILT is. La ... iTJ`7 Y! gaii(r .Pd FmraaZ t, rut Ni1JL LLtLPa i b M I.p*a ce%'.I+,A: ILL, r:: irmolidad. Ordinance Form 08-27- 19 Page 63 of 414 ORDINANCE N(}.2024-4536 Page 7 of 8 Ordinance F^000n-27 lo Page 64 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4536 Page 8 of 8 Exhibit B Ordinance Form 08-27-19 Page 65 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.8. Case #REZ2025-000018 Sponsor: Heather Wade, Principal Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2024-4541 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban or PDD Planned Development District and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban or PDD Planned Development District for approximately 32.26 acres being 130 lots and common area within Woodcreek Section One Subdivision, save and except Woodcreek Drive from State Highway 6 S to Lake Forest Court S. Case #REZ2025-000018 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this city-initiated rezoning as it is required for compliance with state law. Summary: This is a city-initiated rezoning of approximately 32.26 acres generally located within Woodcreek Section One Subdivision, save and except Woodcreek Drive from State Highway 6 S to Lake Forest Court S from GS General Suburban or PDD Planned Development District and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban or PDD Planned Development District. This rezoning is in effort to comply with state law (Senate Bill 1567). Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2024-4541 - Ordinance - 08_22_2024 Page 66 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4541 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," ARTICLE 4 "ZONING DISTRICTS," SECTION 4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 32.26 ACRES BEING 130 LOTS AND COMMON AREA WITHIN WOODCREEK SECTION ONE SUBDIVISION, EXCLUDING WOODCREEK DRIVE FROM STATE HIGHWAY 6 S TO LAKE FOREST COURT AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: PART 2: That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances ofthe City of College Station, Texas that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping ofrefuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date ofpassage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 68 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4541 Page 2 of 4 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 22nd day of August, 2024. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary MXyor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 69 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4541 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit A That Appendix A, "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4, "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended and is to read as follows: The following properties are rezoned to apply a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay zoning as provided in Appendix A, "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 5 "District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards", Section 5.11 "Single -Family Overlay Districts": Approximately 32.26 acres of land, being 130 lots and common area within Woodcreek Section One Subdivision, excluding Woodcreek Drive from State Highway 6 S to Lake Forest Court S. Page 70 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4541 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B 7) 'E Jt..-+~ Ica+c: Page 71 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.9. Case #REZ2025-000019 Sponsor: Heather Wade, Principal Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2025-4577 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 11.52 acres being 33 lots within Glenhaven Estates Phase 2 Subdivision, save and except Glenhaven Drive, Fernhaven Circle, Francis Circle, and Springhaven Circle, generally located between Brazoswood Drive and Summerglen Drive. Case #REZ2025-000019 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this city-initiated rezoning as it is required for compliance with state law. Summary: This is a city-initiated rezoning of approximately 11.52 acres generally located within Glenhaven Estates Phase 2 Subdivision, save and except Glenhaven Drive, Fernhaven Circle, Francis Circle, and Springhaven Circle, generally located between Brazoswood Drive and Summerglen Drive from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban. This rezoning is in effort to comply with state law (Senate Bill 1567). Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2025-4577 - Ordinance - 02_27_2025 Page 72 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4577 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," ARTICLE 4 "ZONING DISTRICTS," SECTION 4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 11.52 ACRES BEING 33 LOTS WITHIN GLENHAVEN ESTATES PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION, EXCLUDING GLENHAVEN DRIVE, FERNHAVEN CIRCLE, FRANCIS CIRCLE, AND SPRINGHAVEN CIRCLE DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances ofthe City of College Station, Texas that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 74 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4577 Page 2 of 4 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 27t'' day of February, 2025. ATTEST: APPREOVED: City Secretary MXyor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 75 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4577 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit A That Appendix A, "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4, "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended and is to read as follows: The following properties are rezoned to apply a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay zoning as provided in Appendix A, "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 5 "District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards", Section 5.11 "Single -Family Overlay Districts": Approximately 11.52 acres of land, being 33 lots within Glenhaven Estates Phase 2 Subdivision, excluding Glenhaven Drive, Fernhaven Circle, Francis Circle, and Springhaven Circle. Page 76 of 414 eneral: to Couid& O.' Neighborhood Prevaling Overlay LLSb-SZOZ 'ONDDNVNIQ2IO Page 77 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.10. REZ2025-000012-R4 Sponsor: Heather Wade, Principal Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2023-4477 for the property described herein and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MH Middle Housing, R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing and R-4 Multi-Family for 2.85 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 10-19, generally located along Cooner Street. Case #REZ2025-000012 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this city-initiated rezoning as it is required for compliance with state law. Summary: This is a city-initiated rezoning of approximately 2.85 acres, generally located along Cooner Street from MH Middle Housing, R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing and R-4 Multi-Family. This rezoning is in effort to comply with state law (Senate Bill 1567). Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. 2023-4477 - Ordinance - 10_26_2023 Page 78 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2 “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AS FOLLOWS: A. FROM MH MIDDLE HOUSING OR R-4 MULTI-FAMILY TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY OR R-4 MULTI-FAMILY AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 2.85 ACRES BEING THE COONER ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOTS 10-19, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG COONER STREET; B. FROM D DUPLEX OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.6 ACRES BEING THE COONER ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOTS 20-30, BLOCK 5, LOTS 1-8, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG COONER STREET; C. FROM D DUPLEX OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.4 ACRES BEING COLLEGE VISTA, BLOCK E, LOTS 1-14, BLOCK F, LOTS 1-10, BLOCK G, LOTS 1-5, BLOCK H LOTS 1-3, 4R-5R, AND 6-7, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG LIVE OAK STREET AND ASH STREET; D. FROM D DUPLEX OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.11 ACRES BEING UNIVERSITY OAKS PHASE 2, BLOCK 5, LOTS 1-13, 14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21-23, 24A1-24A2, AND 25R, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG DOMINIK DRIVE; E. FROM MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.66 ACRES BEING LITTLE-KNIGHT ADDITION, LOTS 1-18, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG AURORA COURT, AND; F. FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 23.62 ACRES BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE JOSEPH E. SCOTT LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 50, AND CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 7, IN COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, INCLUDING ALL OF THE W.M. SPARKS SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED BY PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 139, PAGE 261, AND PORTIONS OF WEST PARK ADDITION AND WEST PARK 2ND ADDITION AS DESCRIBED BY PLATS RECORDED IN VOLUME 102, PAGE 198 AND VOLUME 128, PAGE 574, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AS WELL AS SUBSEQUENT REPLATS OF PORTIONS OF THESE SUBDIVISIONS IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY LUTHER STREET, MONTCLAIR AVENUE, GROVE STREET, AND MARYEM STREET; Page 80 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 2 of 9 CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A,” Exhibit “B,” Exhibit “C,” Exhibit “D,” Exhibit “E,” and Exhibit “F” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 81 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 3 of 9 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 26th day of October, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 82 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 4 of 9 Exhibit A That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from MH Middle Housing or R-4 Multi-Family to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay or R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 10-19 R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Lots 10, 12 and 17-19) MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Lots 11 and 13-16) Page 83 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 5 of 9 Exhibit B That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 20-30, Block 5, Lots 1-8 Page 84 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 6 of 9 Exhibit C That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: College Vista, Block E, Lots 1-14, Block F, Lots 1-10, Block G, Lots 1-5, and Block H, Lots 1-3, 4R-5R, and 6-7 Page 85 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 7 of 9 Exhibit D That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: University Oaks Phase 2, Block 5, Lots 1-13, 14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21- 23, 24A1-24A2, and 25R Page 86 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 8 of 9 Exhibit E That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Little-Knight Addition, Lots 1-18 Page 87 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 9 of 9 Exhibit F That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Approximately 23.62 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Joseph E. Scott League, Abstract No. 50, and Crawford Burnett League, Abstract No. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including all of the W.M. Sparks Subdivision as described by plat recorded in Volume 139, Page 261, and portions of West Park Addition and West Park 2nd Addition as described by plats recorded in Volume 102, Page 198 And Volume 128, Page 574, respectively, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, as well as subsequent replats of portions of these subdivisions in an area generally bounded by Luther Street, Montclair Avenue, Grove Street, and Maryem Street. Page 88 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.11. Case #REZ2025-000012-Conditional Sponsor: Heather Wade, Principal Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing in part Ordinance 2024-4542 and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing, provided associated conditions are met, for approximately 3.66 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including portions of Lot 5 and Lot 6 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and subsequent replats of portions of these two lots, within an area generally bounded by Lincoln Avenue, Nimitz Street, and Eisenhower Street. Case #REZ2025-000012 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this city-initiated rezoning as it is required for compliance with state law. Summary: This is a city-initiated rezoning of approximately 3.66 acres generally bounded by Lincoln Avenue, Nimitz Street, and Eisenhower Street boundary from MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing, provided associated conditions are met. This rezoning is in effort to comply with state law (Senate Bill 1567). Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Rezoning Map 2. AreaOO_Survey_20240611 3. 2024-4542 - Ordinance - 08_22_2024 Page 89 of 414 City-Initiated Rezoning Proposed Area "00" (Avenue A & vicinity) Portions of Lots 5 and 6 D.A. Smith Subdivision College Station, Texas May 2024 BASELINE All of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including portions of Lot 5 and Lot 6 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and subsequent replats of portions of these two lots, within an area generally bounded by Lincoln Avenue, Nimitz Street, and Eisenhower Street, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an "X" mark found cut in concrete marking the intersection of the southwest right-of- way boundary of Avenue A and the northwest right-of-way boundary of Lincoln Avenue, being the east corner of Lot 5-1 as described by the plat of Lots 5-1 through 5-6, D.A. Smith Subdivision recorded in volume 4586, page 78 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, from where City of College Station control monument no. 122 bears N 6° 30' 16" W-2286.2 feet*; Thence across Avenue A and along the northwest right-of-way boundary of Lincoln Avenue as follows: N 34° 17' 36 " E-30.53 feet*, N 41° 30' 03" E-67.39 feet*, and N 41° 57' 36" E-19.37 feet* to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left with a radius of 28.00 feet*; Thence along said curve to the left through a central angle of 50° 20' 09", the chord of which bears N 5° 52 ' 35" E -23.81 feet*, to its end in the southwest right-of-way boundary of Nimitz Street; Thence along the said southwest boundary of Nimitz Street as follows: N 37° 08' 15" W-28.63 feet*, N 44° 59' 48" W-60.41 feet*, N 47° 04' 31 " W-89.79 feet*, N 48° 09' 51 " W -50.07 feet* (prescriptive right-of-way boundary), N 48 ° 32' 30" W -49 .69 feet*, N 43° 18' 24" W -50.45 feet*, N 48 ° 23' 31" W -50 .11 feet*, N 48° 47' 55" W -50.00 feet*, N 49° 13' 45" W -53.14 feet*, N 49° 40' 03" W -53.00 feet*, N 48° 15' 46" W -43 .83 feet*, and N 51 ° 55' 56" W -50.20 feet* to the northwest line of said Lot 6 and a southwest boundary of the College View subdivision, at the north corner of Lot 6-1 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by the plat recorded in volume 9912 , page 22 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas; Thence S 41 ° 25 ' 54" W -339.45 feet* along the northwest lines of said Lot 6 and Lot 5, and the southwest boundary of the College View subdivision, to a point in the middle of Eisenhower Street; Thence S 50° 18' 00" E -345.54 feet*, generally along the middle of pavement of Eisenhower Street, to a point for corner of this described tract on a southwestward extension of the northwest line of Lot 5-5 of the said plat of Lots 5-1 through 5-6; Thence N 41 ° 02' 08" E -180.74 feet*, passing the west corner of said Lot 5-5 at 30 .3 feet*, to the common corner of Lot 5-5 and Lot 5-6 in the southwest right-of-way boundary of Avenue A; Thence S 48° 27' 52" E -301 .55 feet*, along the said southwest boundary of Avenue A, to the Point of Beginning and containing 3.66 acres of land more or less. Rezoning Area "00" (Avenue A & vicinity) Page 1 of 2 1701 Southwest Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77840 I 979.693.2777 I TxSurv F-10030200 I BaselineSurveyors.net Page 91 of 414 BASELINE Bearings and *distances are Texas State Plane, Central Zone NAD83 datum, determined by GPS and checked between City of College Station control monuments no. 120 and no . 122 (N 17° 03' 41 " W). Approximate surface distances can be computed by multiplying these provided grid distances by an average combined scale factor of 1.000100. This document was prepared under 22 Texas Administrative Code §138.95, does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey, and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivision for which it was prepared. See survey exhibit plat dated May 2024. Rezoning Area "00" (Avenue A & vicinity) •••••••••••·••••••• 5045 ~ 0,:, O~••• Page 2 of 2 1701 Southwest Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77840 I 979.693.2777 I TxSurv F-10030200 I BaselineSurveyors.net Page 92 of 414 Page 93 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4542 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," ARTICLE 4 "ZONING DISTRICTS," SECTION 4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 3.66 ACRES BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE RICHARD CARTER LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 8, IN COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, INCLUDING PORTIONS OF LOT 5 AND LOT 6 OF THE D.A. SMITH SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED BY PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 49, PAGE 106 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND SUBSEQUENT REPLATS OF PORTIONS OF THESE TWO LOTS, WITHIN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY LINCOLN AVENUE, NIMITZ STREET, AND EISENHOWER STREET, AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: PART 2: That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances ofthe City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A", Exhibit "B", and Exhibit C" attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. If any provision ofthis Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances ofthe City of College Station, Texas that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping ofrefuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date ofpassage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 94 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4542 Page 2 of 7 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 22nd day of August, 2024. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary MXyor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 95 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4542 Page 3 of 7 Exhibit A That Appendix A, "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4, "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended and is to read as follows: The following properties are rezoned to MH Middle Housing with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay zoning. BASELINE LICC City -Initiated Rationing Proposed Area "OO" (Avenue A & vieir ty) Portions of Lots 5 and 6 D.A. Smith Subdivision College Station, Texas May 2024 All of that certain Tract or paroel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station. Brazos County, Texas, including portions of Lot 5 and Lot 6 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas_ and subsequent re plats of portions of the two lots, within an area generally bounded by Lincoln Avenue, Nimitz Street, and Eisenhower Street, and being mare particularly described as foliows: Beginning at an `at" mark found cut in concrete marking the intersection ofthe southwest right-of- way boundary of Avenue A and the northwest right-of"vray boundary of Lincoln Avenue, being the ease corner of Lot 5-1 as described by the plat of Lots 5-1 through 5-6, O.A. Smith Subdivision recorded in volume 4586, page 78 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, from where City of college $lotion control monument no, 122 bears N 6° 30' 16" W-2256,2 teen Thence across Avenue A and along the northwest right-oPivay boundary of Lincoln Avenue as follows: N 34" 17' 36• E — 30.53 feet', N 41' 30' 03" E — 67.39 feet'. and N 41` 57' 36" E — 19.37 feet' to the beginning of a non•tangent curve to the [eft with a radius of 28.00 feel; Thence along said curve to the left through a central angle of 50' 20' 09`, the chord of which bears N 5° 52' 35' E — 23.81 feet'_ to its end in the southwest right-of-way boundary of Nimitz Street; Thence along the said southwest boundary of Nimitz Street as follows: N 37' 08' 15" V — 28.133 feel*, N 44` 59' 46° W — 60,41 feet', N 47° 04' 31" W— 69.79 feet', N 48° 08' 51' W — 50,07 feet' (prescriptive right-of-way boundary), 11 46' 32' 30" W — 49.69 feel', N 43° 19' 24' W — 50.46 feet*, N 48° 23' 31 ° 'W — 50.11 feet"_ N 46° 47' 55" W — 50.00 feel', N 49° 13. 45' W — 53.14 feat', N 49° 40' 03" W — 53.00 feet'. N 4a' 15' 46' 1N — 43.83 feat`, and N 51 ° 55' 56• 1n1 — 50.20 feet` to the northwest line of said Lot 6 and a southwest boundary of the College View subdivision, at the north comer of Lot 6-1 of the D.A Smith Subdivision as described by the plat recorded in volume 9912, page 22 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County_ Texas: Thence S 41 ° 25' 54" W— 339.45 feet' along the northwest lines of said Lot 6 and Lot 5, and the southwest boundary ofthe College Vlew 5ubdmsion. to a point in the middle of Eisenhower Street: Thence S 50' 16' 00" E — 345.54 feet', generally along the middle of pavement of Eisenhower Street to apoint for corner of this described tract orr a southwestward extension of the northwest line of Lot 5-5 of the said plat of Lots 5-1 through 5-5: Thence N 41° 02' t}8' E — 180.74 feat', passing the west corner of said Lot 5-5 at 30.3 feet', to the cwnmon corner of Lot 5-5 and Lot 5-6 in the southwest right -of --way boundary of Avenue A: Thence S 48' 27' 52" E —' 301.55 feat`, along the said soulhwest boundary Df Avenue A. tG the Point of Beginning and containing 3.66 acres of land more or less. Rezoning Area CO' (Av enue A 8 vion I1; Pargm I or 2 irn+Sault at Parkway. Suflini Calkeeses .Iexas?reiD 1 9 6K2xrr I T2SruF-1e, 0200 I 1Elaee1re5ir.agusrel Page 96 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4542 Page 4 of 7 BASEL/NE =Chi Bearings and `distances are Texas State Plane, Central Zone NAM datum, determined by GPS and checked between City of College Station carrtrol monuments no. 120 and no. 122 (N i7° 0 ' 41' W). Approximate surface distances can be computed by multiplying these provided grid distances by an average combined Scale factor of 1.000100. This document Tree prepared under ZZ Timm Administrative Code §138.95. does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey, and fs not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those lights and interests implied or established by the creation or rew-nfigurati n if ti14 twirri4wiry 4f ing p Ii iS51i' 4L ivItIon• for which it was prepared. See sunray exhibit plat dated May 2024. Fismn.'igNa3'Ch7'{Avenus AY. vicinity] Pogo 2 oF2 17iN aer eel P3rkw3r, Sully 164, Calege Sieber. Taa377Ba6 i 976.693.27T1 i T151,'u F-10536200 I aaaelee5u.rer na1 Page 97 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4542 Page 5 of 7 BASELINE Eirrtof MI Strom f Eladenno I6GCM I TxlurrF+10113120o 7C1 2. Fkr,y, Sae 164 Collage 5lulkn. r 77841E 974,E43,2777 I ElewllnuEurv1}vrkrW 1I 111 re dufF HENRY P MAYO 045 864 May 2024 St} 100 i e FS dI t I1oee are rl00e 5#ete 1arr:, :ertrd Pane hirs.019.3 datum, Je:eir'1ri J b} 3P5 and checked between rr II 1•' Station control r14rJr'erts ra. '22 ih 17'0.1-41' p1.•ur1Lr.:' surface die:arces erne it rr.Fnedl sonic foete of 10Ll 1CC. Ir 1te mee-x Urld baUrdedc...npi•1.-n pneparod vn7h thle plet. 5 4 2 leAr s 41.25'54' W - 139,45' (335149') 9helelq,dek 0.11911 ae_ 171.67 pg. 104 Peterson 1}; ocre raL 24.30 pi. 225 502 A.Wiue 4, LLr: 024-9 oerr r•ql. 1 F66 pg. ' 65 we71A F F. 99 Lot 5 Pay!a1 C.A. Smith 0.129 acre ' Subdi+riaion vol. 251 role t9 P4' pg_ 105 kobinman I I rat. 839 Area " 00 ' PEI' "5 r 3.66 acres 5-6 role 10244 pp 12.0 I tPi41'012'4@" E 150.74' 0515.75') 5-5 I rn 15-2 1' 15 d..ynua It 0.V 5 ae. rel. 19017 PO' 25 troelWalters1 0.0854 de, rot. 17794. 29' 42 t3se1.stt 4.0e5 ae, rep-1 f. e-a L14 L1.3 L' 2 L:T 7 2. Hrpat alb 922 Ure Dimension Table 4 LI 4 34''7'3E• E 3633' (3a6S) L2 h 41 3 '03" E 67.20' k67.40'1 L3 11'ST36" E 19.37' k19.3E'; L4 1• }7'Oi.15' k 25ti' r:•t2'1 LS N 4.4•5I4 4S- k h- -1 . a3-, Le N 4•1144.3'' rr Y_ ... ..~ -.:'1 L: N .1.. ia'5'• r! 1:.t:. :...) Ln N 4fl.13..50 r! 9 ea' :l. •f:'1 Ln N }.s'1n'34'w ryo#r>' iw' .r."1 L19 N 4W33'3'• Y! NCI 'Na'3'1 L11 N 1633'54' r! y691i 30ar'. LIP N 49'1.3'15 r! 3'1' 5.3' S'' LI3 N 19'40k.3' w 33G4' }34''1 L14. N 44 15 16• y1 43 e3' 43 e4' LI5 N 51'SS }FL 1111 563k' 532''.1 1111111 952+ pg. 75L10 9 L7 6-16 1.3 Raplat vol_ ss1: p9. 91 r 6-125-1 I= 0 54fi,.7 phl10F %seta ' 4 Li - - C d 05 CPS In 11111ra1rf na. ,! 122 Gan N G'31710• W-22562' ,': 22e0.4' .uio_e detancel from L. he Print of 4egInnri tn.0.OJ This documon- was prepared order 22 Towns .rdmlrlp#rallve CM, ' 58.9b, dims not reflect the reaula a' or an the graurd survey. and is not == be used #a . or+rey ar es:ab1ish Interests In raol property rreept these nght9andinkeresksirrpliedorrstoblis}ed by The treU:ior 4.11 retahfialJrdti::n of the beurdarp of the pslItIcal aubdlvlolon far which it was prepared. Lincoln Avenue L4 L5 2 l: a jr9 a 4.475mk ra4i '3++60' P4. 1278 370 Hrritx L.0a75 o . val. '9617 pa. 20 Fat -iarC ertlet tl. a533 pg. 'Lea Ln1. ]E1.S99 50'20'05' 11. 28.00'((2&061 Proposed Rezoning Area ' r00rr Portions of Lots 5 8c 6 D.A. Smith Subdivision College Station, Texas Page 98 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4542 Page 6 of 7 Exhibit B That the Follow Conditions must be satisfied before the rezoning becomes effective: 1. Construction of an approved access drive or turnaround, that meets Fire Department standards, be provided within 100 feet ofthe terminus ofAvenue A. This can also be achieved by the extension of Avenue A to Eisenhower Street, Nimitz Street, or Ash Street. Page 99 of 414 Page 7 of 7ORDINANCENO. 2024-4542 Exhibit C Housing '{i' Hgh Oi cupincyr Overlay? 9 y + Occupancy 0YErldy/' Page 100 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.12. Case #REZ2025-000012 Sponsor: Heather Wade, Principal Planner Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing, in their entirety, Ordinance 2023-4477, Ordinance 2023-4479, Ordinance 2023- 4481, Ordinance 2024-4499, Ordinance 2024-4528, Ordinance 2024-4543, Ordinance 2024-4549, Ordinance 2025-4583, Ordinance 2025-4584, and Ordinance 2025-4585, and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing for the following twenty-three areas: approximately 1.152 acres at 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, and 110-119 Knox Drive, being Lots 18-27, Block 29 and Lots 12-16, Block 31 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 401, generally located southwest of the intersection of Knox Drive and Old Wellborn Road; approximately 0.412 acres at 418, 420, 422, 424, and 426 Baby Bear Drive, being Lots 1-5, Block 32 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 109, generally located northeast of the intersection of Baby Bear Drive and Towers Parkway; approximately 0.406 acres at 133, 135, 137, 139, and 141 Deacon Drive West, being Lots 1-5, Block 21 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 107, generally located northeast of the intersection of Deacon Drive West and General Parkway; approximately 2.01 acres being The Barracks II Phase 400 Block 36, Lots 27R & 28-40, generally located at the south corner of Tang Cake Drive and Old Wellborn Road; approximately 1.05 acres of the of the D.A. Smith Subdivision recorded in Volume 19506, Page 169, and generally located along Avenue A; approximately 4.66 acres Little-Knight Addition, Lots 1-18, generally located on Aurora Court; approximately 23.62 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Joseph E. Scott league, abstract no. 50, and Crawford Burnett league, abstract no. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including all of the W.M. Sparks Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 139, page 261, and portions of West Park Addition and West Park 2nd Addition as described by plats recorded in volume 102, page 198 and volume 128, page 574, respectively, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, as well as subsequent replats of portions of these subdivisions in an area generally bounded by Luther Street, Montclair Avenue, Grove Street, and Maryem Street; approximately 8.15 acres being Pecan Tree Estates Phase One Subdivision and Pecan Tree Estates Phase Two Subdivision, save and except 0.687 acres labeled "park," generally located along Oney Hervey Drive; approximately 4.6 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 20-30, Block 5, Lots 1-8, generally located along Cooner Street; approximately 5.4 acres being College Vista, Block E, Lots 1-14, Block F, Lots 1-10, Block G, Lots 1-5, Block H Lots 1-3, 4R-5R, and 6-7, generally located along Live Oak Street and Ash Street; approximately 2.02 acres being Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lots 1-16 and 17R, generally located along Lincoln Avenue; approximately 5.11 acres being University Oaks Phase 2, Block 5, Lots 1-13, 14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21-23, 24A1- 24A2, and 25R, generally located at along Dominik Drive; approximately 4.12 acres being Timber Ridge Addition Phase 1, Block 2, Lots 13-24, Block 3, Lots 12-22, generally located along University Oaks Blvd; approximately 1.10 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being a portion of Lot 12 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and the northeast half (approximate) of the adjoining right-of-way of Turner Street , generally for the properties located along Gilbert Street and Page 101 of 414 Turner Street; 0.23 of an acre being all of a called 0.13 acre tract recorded in Volume 13901, Page 36 OPRBCT and all of a tract of land called to be Lot 27 of Pasler Addition recorded in Volume 18475, Page 202 OPRBCT Richard Carter League Survey, Abstract, generally located along Turner Street; approximately 12.85 acres being The Barracks II Phase 111 Subdivision, and The Barracks II Phase 112, Block 38, Lots 1-24, Block 39, Lots 1-10, Common Area 13 and Parkland 12, generally bounded by Towers Parkway, Goldilocks Lane, and Cain Road; approximately 18.83 acres being Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 Subdivision, Volume 14370, Page 149, and Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 2A Subdivision, generally bounded by Deacon Drive W, Towers Parkway, Oak Crest, and Holleman Drive S; approximately 6.71 acres being Parkway Plaza Phase 5, Block 1, Lots 1-15, Block 2, Lots 1- 12, generally located on Pine Ridge Dr.; approximately 55.49 acres being The Barracks Phase 1 Subdivision, The Barracks Phase 2 Subdivision, Williamsgate Phase 1 Subdivision, Buena Vida Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 1 Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 2 Subdivision, and 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Rock Prairie Road W, Towers Parkway, Deacon Drive W, and General Parkway; approximately 28.4 acres being University Heights Phase 1 Subdivision, save and except Common Area 4, and University Heights Phase 2 and 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Paloma Ridge Drive, Feather Run, Davidson Drive, and Holleman Drive South; approximately 8.8 acres being Las Palomas Subdivision, generally bounded by Abbate Road, Feather Run, Kenyon Drive, and Holleman Drive South; approximately 28.14 acres all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Morgan Rector league, abstract no. 46, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including portions of the Richards Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 137, page 25 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and subsequent replats of portions of it, and generally being the majority of the properties which front on Richards Street, Crest Street and Sterling Street; approximately 19.34 acres being Autumn Chase, Block 1, Lots 1-7, Brentwood Section Two, Block 4, Lots 1-30, Block 5, Lots 1-23, Block 6, Lots 1-4, and Brentwood Section Three Subdivision, generally located along Cornell Dr., Brentwood Dr., and Southwest Pkwy; and approximately 5.8 acres being Ashford Square Subdivision Replat, volume 3202, page 61, generally located along Ashford Dr. Case #REZ2025-000012 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 25, 2025, City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Neighborhood Integrity Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this city-initiated rezoning as it is required for compliance with state law. Summary: This is a city-initiated rezoning of 23 areas from MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing: 1. approximately 1.152 acres at 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, and 110-119 Knox Drive, being Lots 18-27, Block 29 and Lots 12-16, Block 31 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 401, generally located southwest of the intersection of Knox Drive and Old Wellborn Road; 2. approximately 0.412 acres at 418, 420, 422, 424, and 426 Baby Bear Drive, being Lots 1-5, Block 32 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 109, generally located northeast of the intersection of Baby Bear Drive and Towers Parkway; Page 102 of 414 3. approximately 0.406 acres at 133, 135, 137, 139, and 141 Deacon Drive West, being Lots 1-5, Block 21 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 107, generally located northeast of the intersection of Deacon Drive West and General Parkway; 4. approximately 2.01 acres being The Barracks II Phase 400 Block 36, Lots 27R & 28-40, generally located at the south corner of Tang Cake Drive and Old Wellborn Road; 5. approximately 1.05 acres of the of the D.A. Smith Subdivision recorded in Volume 19506, Page 169, and generally located along Avenue A; approximately 4.66 acres Little-Knight Addition, Lots 1-18, generally located on Aurora Court; 6. approximately 23.62 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Joseph E. Scott league, abstract no. 50, and Crawford Burnett league, abstract no. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including all of the W.M. Sparks Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 139, page 261, and portions of West Park Addition and West Park 2nd Addition as described by plats recorded in volume 102, page 198 and volume 128, page 574, respectively, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, as well as subsequent replats of portions of these subdivisions in an area generally bounded by Luther Street, Montclair Avenue, Grove Street, and Maryem Street; 7. approximately 8.15 acres being Pecan Tree Estates Phase One Subdivision and Pecan Tree Estates Phase Two Subdivision, save and except 0.687 acres labeled "park," generally located along Oney Hervey Drive; 8. approximately 4.6 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 20-30, Block 5, Lots 1-8, generally located along Cooner Street; 9. approximately 5.4 acres being College Vista, Block E, Lots 1-14, Block F, Lots 1-10, Block G, Lots 1-5, Block H Lots 1-3, 4R-5R, and 6-7, generally located along Live Oak Street and Ash Street; 10. approximately 2.02 acres being Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lots 1-16 and 17R, generally located along Lincoln Avenue; 11. approximately 5.11 acres being University Oaks Phase 2, Block 5, Lots 1-13, 14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21-23, 24A1-24A2, and 25R, generally located at along Dominik Drive; 12. approximately 4.12 acres being Timber Ridge Addition Phase 1, Block 2, Lots 13-24, Block 3, Lots 12-22, generally located along University Oaks Blvd; 13. approximately 1.10 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being a portion of Lot 12 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and the northeast half (approximate) of the adjoining right-of-way of Turner Street , generally for the properties located along Gilbert Street and Turner Street; 14. 0.23 of an acre being all of a called 0.13 acre tract recorded in Volume 13901, Page 36 OPRBCT and all of a tract of land called to be Lot 27 of Pasler Addition recorded in Volume 18475, Page 202 OPRBCT Richard Carter League Survey, Abstract, generally located along Turner Street; 15. approximately 12.85 acres being The Barracks II Phase 111 Subdivision, and The Barracks II Phase 112, Block 38, Lots 1-24, Block 39, Lots 1-10, Common Area 13 and Parkland 12, generally bounded by Towers Parkway, Goldilocks Lane, and Cain Road; 16. approximately 18.83 acres being Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 Subdivision, Volume 14370, Page 149, and Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 2A Subdivision, generally bounded by Deacon Drive W, Towers Parkway, Oak Crest, and Holleman Drive S; 17. approximately 6.71 acres being Parkway Plaza Phase 5, Block 1, Lots 1-15, Block 2, Lots 1- 12, generally located on Pine Ridge Dr.; Page 103 of 414 18. approximately 55.49 acres being The Barracks Phase 1 Subdivision, The Barracks Phase 2 Subdivision, Williamsgate Phase 1 Subdivision, Buena Vida Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 1 Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 2 Subdivision, and 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Rock Prairie Road W, Towers Parkway, Deacon Drive W, and General Parkway; 19. approximately 28.4 acres being University Heights Phase 1 Subdivision, save and except Common Area 4, and University Heights Phase 2 and 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Paloma Ridge Drive, Feather Run, Davidson Drive, and Holleman Drive South; 20. approximately 8.8 acres being Las Palomas Subdivision, generally bounded by Abbate Road, Feather Run, Kenyon Drive, and Holleman Drive South; 21. approximately 28.14 acres all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Morgan Rector league, abstract no. 46, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including portions of the Richards Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 137, page 25 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and subsequent replats of portions of it, and generally being the majority of the properties which front on Richards Street, Crest Street and Sterling Street; 22. approximately 19.34 acres being Autumn Chase, Block 1, Lots 1-7, Brentwood Section Two, Block 4, Lots 1-30, Block 5, Lots 1-23, Block 6, Lots 1-4, and Brentwood Section Three Subdivision, generally located along Cornell Dr., Brentwood Dr., and Southwest Pkwy; and 23. approximately 5.8 acres being Ashford Square Subdivision Replat, volume 3202, page 61, generally located along Ashford Dr. This rezoning is in effort to comply with state law (Senate Bill 1567). Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. 2023-4477 - Ordinance - 10_26_2023 2. 2023-4479 - Ordinance - 10_26_2023 3. 2023-4481 - Ordinance - 10_26_2023 4. 2024-4499 - Ordinance - 01_25_2024 5. 2024-4528 - Ordinance - 07_08_2024 6. 2024-4543 - Ordinance - 08_22_2024 7. 2024-4549 - Ordinance - 09_12_2024 8. 2025-4583 - Ordinance - 03_27_2025 9. 2025-4584 - Ordinance - 03_27_2025 10. 2025-4585 - Ordinance - 03_27_2025 11. Rezoning Map_I_UNIVERSITY_OAKS_BLVD 12. Rezoning Map_J_AURORA_CT 13. Rezoning Map_Y_GROVE_MARYEM_LUTHER_MONTCLAIR 14. Rezoning Map_B2_COONER_ST 15. Rezoning Map_D_LIVE_OAK_ST_ASH_ST 16. Rezoning Map_E_LINCOLN_AVE 17. Rezoning Map_F_G_H_DOMINIK_DR 18. Rezoning Map_M_PINE_RIDGE_DR 19. Rezoning Map_PQRST_CORNELL_DR 20. Rezoning Map_W_ASHFORD_DR 21. Rezoning Map_Z_ONEY_HERVEY_DR 22. Rezoning Map_II_PALOMA_RIDGE_DR 23. Rezoning Map_HH_KENYON_DR 24. Rezoning Map_JJ_KK_CAIN_RD Page 104 of 414 25. Rezoning Map_BARRACKS_DEACON_DR 26. Rezoning Map_AVENUE_A 27. Rezoning Map_SS_TURNER_ST 28. AreaSS_Survey_20240624 29. Rezoning Map_TANG_CAKE_DR 30. Rezoning Map_O_RICHARDS 31. AreaO_Survey_20240610 32. Rezoning Map_701_703_TURNER_ST 33. 701 703 Turner St survey 34. Rezoning Map_BARRACKS_KNOX_DR 35. Rezoning Map_BARRACKS_BABY_BEAR_DR 36. Rezoning Map_LL_PAPA_BEAR_MOMMA_BEAR_DR 37. Rezoning Map _MM_KEEFER_LP Page 105 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2 “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AS FOLLOWS: A. FROM MH MIDDLE HOUSING OR R-4 MULTI-FAMILY TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY OR R-4 MULTI-FAMILY AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 2.85 ACRES BEING THE COONER ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOTS 10-19, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG COONER STREET; B. FROM D DUPLEX OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.6 ACRES BEING THE COONER ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOTS 20-30, BLOCK 5, LOTS 1-8, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG COONER STREET; C. FROM D DUPLEX OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.4 ACRES BEING COLLEGE VISTA, BLOCK E, LOTS 1-14, BLOCK F, LOTS 1-10, BLOCK G, LOTS 1-5, BLOCK H LOTS 1-3, 4R-5R, AND 6-7, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG LIVE OAK STREET AND ASH STREET; D. FROM D DUPLEX OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.11 ACRES BEING UNIVERSITY OAKS PHASE 2, BLOCK 5, LOTS 1-13, 14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21-23, 24A1-24A2, AND 25R, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG DOMINIK DRIVE; E. FROM MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.66 ACRES BEING LITTLE-KNIGHT ADDITION, LOTS 1-18, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG AURORA COURT, AND; F. FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN OR MH MIDDLE HOUSING TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 23.62 ACRES BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE JOSEPH E. SCOTT LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 50, AND CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 7, IN COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, INCLUDING ALL OF THE W.M. SPARKS SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED BY PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 139, PAGE 261, AND PORTIONS OF WEST PARK ADDITION AND WEST PARK 2ND ADDITION AS DESCRIBED BY PLATS RECORDED IN VOLUME 102, PAGE 198 AND VOLUME 128, PAGE 574, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AS WELL AS SUBSEQUENT REPLATS OF PORTIONS OF THESE SUBDIVISIONS IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY LUTHER STREET, MONTCLAIR AVENUE, GROVE STREET, AND MARYEM STREET; Page 106 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 2 of 9 CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A,” Exhibit “B,” Exhibit “C,” Exhibit “D,” Exhibit “E,” and Exhibit “F” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 107 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 3 of 9 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 26th day of October, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 108 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 4 of 9 Exhibit A That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from MH Middle Housing or R-4 Multi-Family to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay or R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 10-19 R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Lots 10, 12 and 17-19) MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Lots 11 and 13-16) Page 109 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 5 of 9 Exhibit B That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 20-30, Block 5, Lots 1-8 Page 110 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 6 of 9 Exhibit C That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: College Vista, Block E, Lots 1-14, Block F, Lots 1-10, Block G, Lots 1-5, and Block H, Lots 1-3, 4R-5R, and 6-7 Page 111 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 7 of 9 Exhibit D That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from D Duplex or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: University Oaks Phase 2, Block 5, Lots 1-13, 14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21- 23, 24A1-24A2, and 25R Page 112 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 8 of 9 Exhibit E That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Little-Knight Addition, Lots 1-18 Page 113 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4477 Page 9 of 9 Exhibit F That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban or MH Middle Housing to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Approximately 23.62 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Joseph E. Scott League, Abstract No. 50, and Crawford Burnett League, Abstract No. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including all of the W.M. Sparks Subdivision as described by plat recorded in Volume 139, Page 261, and portions of West Park Addition and West Park 2nd Addition as described by plats recorded in Volume 102, Page 198 And Volume 128, Page 574, respectively, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, as well as subsequent replats of portions of these subdivisions in an area generally bounded by Luther Street, Montclair Avenue, Grove Street, and Maryem Street. Page 114 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," ARTICLE 4 "ZONING DISTRICTS," SECTION 4.2 "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AS FOLLOWS: A.FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 2.02 ACRES BEING LINCOLN PLACE PHASE 2, BLOCK C, LOTS 1-16 AND 17R, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG LINCOLN AVENUE;B.FROM D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.12 ACRES BEING TIMBER RIDGE ADDITION PHASE 1, BLOCK 2, LOTS 13-24, BLOCK 3, LOTS 12-22, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG UNIVERSITY OAKS BOULEVARD;C.FROM D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 6.71 ACRES BEING PARKWAY PLAZA PHASE 5, BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-15, BLOCK 2, LOTS 1-12, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG PINE RIDGE DRIVE; D.FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN OR D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 19.34 ACRES BEING AUTUMN CHASE, BLOCK 1, LOTS 1-7, BRENTWOOD SECTION TWO, BLOCK 4, LOTS 1-30, BLOCK 5, LOTS 1-23, BLOCK 6, LOTS 1-4, AND BRENTWOOD SECTION THREE SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG CORNELL DRIVE, BRENTWOOD DRIVE, AND SOUTHWEST PARKWAY;E.FROM D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.8 ACRES BEING ASHFORD SQUARE SUBDIVISION REPLAT, VOLUME 3202, PAGE 61, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG ASHFORD DRIVE;F.FROM D DUPLEX TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 8.15 ACRES BEING PECAN TREE ESTATES PHASE ONE SUBDIVISION AND PECAN TREE ESTATES PHASE TWO SUBDIVISION, SAVE AND EXCEPT 0.687 ACRES LABELED "PARK," GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG ONEY HERVEY DRIVE;G.FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN OR T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 28.4 ACRES BEING UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION, SA VE AND EXCEPT COMMON AREA 4, AND UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS PHASE 2 AND 3 SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY PALOMA RIDGE DRIVE, FEATHER RUN, DAVIDSON DRIVE, AND HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTH;H.FROM R RURAL TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 8.8 ACRES BEING LAS PALOMAS SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY ABBATE ROAD, FEATHER RUN, KENYON DRIVE, AND HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTH; Page 115 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 2 of14 I.FROM T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 12.85 ACRES BEING THE BARRACKS II PHASE 111 SUBDIVISION, AND THE BARRACKS II PHASE 112, BLOCK 38, LOTS 1-24, BLOCK 39, LOTS 1-10, COMMON AREA 13 AND PARKLAND 12, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY TOWERS PARKWAY, GOLDILOCKS LANE, AND CAIN ROAD;J.FROM T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.83 ACRES BEING PERSHING POINTE VILLAS PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION, VOLUME 14370, PAGE 149, AND PERSHING POINTE VILLAS PHASE 2A SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY DEACON DRIVE WEST, TOWERS PARKWAY, OAK CREST, AND HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTH, AND;K.FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN OR T TOWNHOUSE TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 55.49 ACRES BEING THE BARRACKS PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION, THE BARRACKS PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION, WILLIAMSGATE PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION, BUENA VIDA SUBDIVISION, 12 AT ROCK PRAIRIE PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION, 12 AT ROCK PRAIRIE PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION, AND 12 AT ROCK PRAIRIE PHASE 3 SUBDIVISION, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD W, TOWERS PARKWAY, DEACON DRIVE W, AND GENERAL PARKWAY; CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A," Exhibit "B," Exhibit "C," Exhibit "D," Exhibit "E," Exhibit "F," Exhibit "G," Exhibit "H," Exhibit "I," Exhibit "J," and Exhibit "K" attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Page 116 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 3 of 14 twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 26th day of October, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 117 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 4 of 14 Exhibit A That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lots 1-16 and 17R Page 118 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 5 of 14 Exhibit B That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Timber Ridge Addition Phase 1, Block 2, Lots 13-24, Block 3, Lots 12-22 Page 119 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 6 of 14 Exhibit C That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Parkway Plaza Phase 5, Block 1, Lots 1-15, Block 2, Lots 1-12 Page 120 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 7 of 14 Exhibit D That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following properties are rezoned from GS General Suburban or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Autumn Chase, Block 1, Lots 1-7, Brentwood Section Two, Block 4, Lots 1-30, Block 5, Lots 1-23, Block 6, Lots 1-4, and Brentwood Section Three Subdivision Page 121 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 8 of 14 Exhibit E That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Ashford Square Subdivision Replat, Volume 3202, Page 61 Page 122 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 9 of 14 Exhibit F That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Pecan Tree Estates Phase One Subdivision and Pecan Tree Estates Phase Two Subdivision, save and except 0.687 acres labeled "Park" Page 123 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 10 of 14 Exhibit G That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: University Heights Phase 1 Subdivision, save and except Common Area 4, and University Heights Phase 2 and 3 Subdivision Page 124 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 11 of 14 Exhibit H That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from R Rural to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Las Palomas Subdivision Page 125 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 12 of 14 Exhibit I That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: The Barracks II Phase 111 Subdivision, and The Barracks II Phase 112, Block 38, Lots 1- 24, Block 39, Lots 1-10, Common Area 13 and Parkland 12 Page 126 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 13 of 14 Exhibit J That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 Subdivision, Volume 14370, Page 149, and Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 2A Subdivision Page 127 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4479 Page 14 of 14 Exhibit K That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban or T Townhouse to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: The Barracks Phase 1 Subdivision, The Barracks Phase 2 Subdivision, Williamsgate Phase 1 Subdivision, Buena Vida Subdivision, 12 At Rock Prairie Phase 1 Subdivision, 12 At Rock Prairie Phase 2 Subdivision, and 12 At Rock Prairie Phase 3 Subdivision Page 128 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4481 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2, “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 0.232 ACRES BEING ALL OF A TRACT OF LAND CALLED TO BE “LOT 27” OF PASLER ADDITION IN A DEED TO SALAM INVESTMENTS, LLC IN VOLUME 17375, PAGE 166 AND VOLUME 18475, PAGE 202 (OPRBCT) AND ALL OF A CALLED 0.13 ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO SALAM INVESTMENTS, LLC RECORDED IN VOLUME 13901, PAGE 36 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS (OPRBCT) AND SAID 0.13 ACRE TRACT BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS 0.132 ACRES IN A BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT RECORDED IN VOLUME 17907, PAGE 129 (OPRBCT) AND GENERALLY LOCATED AT 701-703 TURNER STREET, AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 129 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4481 Page 2 of 5 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 26th day of October, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 130 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4481 Page 3 of 5 Exhibit A That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Page 131 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4481 Page 4 of 5 Page 132 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4481 Page 5 of 5 Exhibit B Page 133 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4499 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 2023-4451 AND AMENDING APPENDIX A “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 4 “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 4.2 “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FROM GS GENERAL SUBURBAN TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 1.05 ACRES BEING LOTS 5-1 TO 5-5 OF THE D.A. SMITH SUBDIVISION CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Ordinance No. 2023-4451, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes as Exhibit “A”, be repealed in its entirety. PART 2: That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “B” and Exhibit “C” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 3: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 4: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 5: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35, and after satisfying all of the conditions described in Exhibit “C”. Page 134 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4498 Page 2 of 9 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 25th day of January, 2023. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 135 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4499 Page 3 of 9 Exhibit A That the following ordinance be repealed in its entirety. Page 136 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4499 Page 4 of 9 Page 137 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4499 Page 5 of 9 Page 138 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4499 Page 6 of 9 Page 139 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4499 Page 7 of 9 Exhibit B That Appendix A “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Lots 5-1 through 5-5 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision Page 140 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4499 Page 8 of 9 Page 141 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4499 Page 9 of 9 Exhibit C That the following conditions must be satisfied before the rezoning becomes effective: 1.Construction of an approved secondary access drive meeting Fire Department standards no less than 175 feet away from Lincoln Avenue; and 2.Dedication of a 10’ right-of-way from each lot along Avenue A and dedication of right-of-way chamfers along the lot that abuts Lincoln Avenue. Page 142 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4528 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," ARTICLE 4 "ZONING DISTRICTS," SECTION 4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING THE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION, PHASE 400, BLOCK 36, LOT 27, MORE GENERALLY LOCATED AT 101 TANG CAKE DRIVE AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine ofnot less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 143 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4528 Page 2 of 4 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 11th day of July, 2024. ATTEST: 4/701,_ City Secretary APPROVED: City Attorney APPROVED: Mayor Page 144 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4528 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit A That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay: Page 145 of 414 aJf 1_ 07 nrrxxIlflfi al!. arum IkQu+ TN. HMIIED FINAL PLAT DIE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION PHASE 400 1911ACFIS w.i {) TS 1- 27. BLOCK 1-6 315 8ZS17-17ZOZ 'ONDDNVNIQ2IO Page 146 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4543 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," ARTICLE 4 "ZONING DISTRICTS," SECTION 4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 28 ACRES BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE MORGAN RECTOR LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 46, IN COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, INCLUDING PORTIONS OF THE RICHARDS SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED BY PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 137, PAGE 25 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND SUBSEQUENT REPLATS OF PORTIONS OF IT, AND GENERALLY BEING THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTIES WHICH FRONT ON RICHARDS STREET, CREST STREET AND STERLING STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine ofnot less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date ofpassage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 147 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4543 Page 2 of 7 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 22nd day of August, 2024. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary MXyor APPROVED: City Attorney Page 148 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4543 Page 3 of 7 Exhibit A That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay zoning: Page 149 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4543 Page 4 of 7 BASELINE.`.; City -Initiated Rezoning Proposed Area "O" Richards St. & Sterling St. area) Richards Subdivision College Station, Texas May 2024 All of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Morgan Rector league, abstract no. 46, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including portions of the Richards Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 137, page 25 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and subsequent replats of portions of it, and generally being the majority of the properties which front on Richards Street, Crest Street and Sterling Street, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly corner of this described zoning boundary at intersection of the southeast boundary of the said Richards Subdivision (vol. 137, pg. 25) and the current northeast right-of-way boundary of Texas Avenue (Business Highway 6), being the south corner of Lot 22A Marin Acres, as described by plat recorded in volume 11036, page 27 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, from where City of College Station control monument no. 120 bears S 30° 01' 36" W— 3568.9 feet*; Thence along the said northeast right-of-way boundary of Texas Avenue, and crossing Sterling Street and Richards Street, as follows: N 49° 30' 38" W — 88.90 feet*, N 51 ° 58' 58" W — 57.03 feet*, N 49° 30' 38" W — 182.33 feet*, N 47° 33' 49" W— 72.39 feet*, and N 49° 30' 38" W — 92.58 feet to the most westerly corner of this described zoning boundary; Thence N 41° 31' 53" E — 1865.30 feet*, along the northwest boundary of the said Richards Subdivision (vol. 137, pg. 25), to its intersection with the southwest boundary of Holleman Place Subdivision as described by replat recorded in volume 19006, page 228 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas; Thence S 49° 11' 54" E — 4.18 feet* to the common corner of Lot 1R-1R and Lot 1R-2R of said Holleman Place Subdivision; Thence N 41° 29' 41" E — 155.50 feet* through said Holleman Place Subdivision along the southeast line of said Lot 1 R-1 R to its common corner with Lot 1 R-4R; Thence S 49° 25' 42" E — 124.50 feet*, along the common line of Lot 1R-4R and Lot 2R of Holleman Place Subdivision, passing at 99.99 feet the common corner of said Lots, to a point in the middle of Richards Street; Thence N 41° 30' 00" E — 719.74 feet*, along the middle of Richards Street to the most northerly corner of this described zoning boundary; Thence 5 48° 15' 19" E — 382.17 feet*, along the northwest boundary of Block Three of the Richards Subdivision as described by replat recorded in volume 481, page 67 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, to the east corner of Lot 6 of said Block Three, also being the most easterly corner of this described zoning boundary; Rezoning Area "0" (Richards St. & Sterling St. area) Page 1 of 2 1701 Southwest Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77840 I 979.693.2777 I TxSury F-10030200 I BaseiineSurveyors.net Page 150 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4543 Page 5 of 7 BASELINE ivy"; Thence S 41 ° 57' 29" W— 244.39 feet* and S 42° 14' 23" W — 335.48 feet*, along the southeast boundary of the said Richards Subdivision (vol. 137, pg. 25), to the east corner of the Parulian Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 12824, page 30 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas; Thence N 48° 01' 38" W — 122.70 feet* along the northeast line of the said Parulian Subdivision and continuing to the point in the middle of Sterling Street, Thence S 41 ° 45' 00" W— 410.17 feet* along the middle of Sterling Street to a point for corner; Thence S 48° 07' 21" E — 120.09 feet", mostly along the southwest line of the said Parulian Subdivision to its south corner; Thence S 41° 45' 57" W — 1742.52 feet*, along the said southwest boundary of the Richards Subdivision (vol. 137, pg. 25) and several subdivisions within it, to the Point of Beginning and containing 28.15 acres of land more or less. Bearings and distances are Texas State Plane, Central Zone NAD83 datum, determined by GPS and checked between City of College Station control monuments no. 120 and no. 122 (N 17° 03' 41" W)_ Approximate surface distances can be computed by multiplying these provided grid distances by an average combined scale factor of 1.000100. This document was prepared under 22 Texas Administrative Code §138.95, does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey, and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivision for which it was prepared. See survey exhibit plat dated May 2024. Rezoning Area'''O" (Richards St. & Sterling St. area) Page 2 of 2 1701 Southwest Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77840 979.693.2777 j T%Sury F-10030200 1 BaseliineSurveyors.net Page 151 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4543 Page 6 of 7 19 3.01. 300 15 I May 2024 0 50 DO aliC Ft Znerlr Tnt`i= 0 :'CJ670:ZZ7' Orf' MOTIOG 172V;4:rt% ;a91'01 250 Anr,inr, INaroot P.6. WE 0.61 ,1,31...1 under Teng ,...1.tmhy, code- §139.95, on,d intcres -ednrzt,oblielm by Whos Eiaoree St. SlerlIng ri 61,1.53. E — I 36530.' (tem.') TFPFR 10A 1. 313 BB Area "0" 28,15 acres 12B vol. 10788... A page 1 of 2 - Proposed Rezoning Area "0" Portions of the Richards Subdivision and Replats College Station, Texas 1.1, >J2 2. 23 o, na, '21 (11 1703,1.'00 e32 G of 1,01,r, Page 152 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4543 Page 7 of 7 Exhibit B rllAtiFop4'°9 High \',( Occupancy, PMulti-Family OverrIy;>: Duplex eneral ti?) vL: e+.::ra Page 153 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4549 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," ARTICLE 4 "ZONING DISTRICTS," SECTION 4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING APPROXIMATELY 1.10 ACRES BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE RICHARD CARTER LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 8, IN COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PORTION OF LOT 12 OF THE D.A. SMITH SUBDIVISION AS DESCRIBED BY PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 49, PAGE 106 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND THE NORTHEAST HALF APPROXIMATE) OF THE ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TURNER STREET, GENERALLY FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED ALONG GILBERT STREET AND TURNER STREET AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine ofnot less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date ofpassage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 154 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4549 Page 2 of 7 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 12th day of September, 2024. ATTEST: 479A APPR.V ED : City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: brest A, thlA4Orta, City Attorney Page 155 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4549 Page 3 of 7 Exhibit A That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from GS General Suburban or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay zoning: Page 156 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4549 Page 4 of 7 BASELINE City -Initiated Rezoning Proposed Area "SS" along Turner Street) Portion of Lot 12, D.A. Smith Subdivision College Station, Texas June 2024 All of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being a portion of Lot 12 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and the northeast half (approximate) of the adjoining right-of-way of Turner Street, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of this described zoning tract, at a 1/2" iron rod found at the north corner of that 0.1307 acre tract described in the deed to Vizu, LP recorded in volume 11166, page 270 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, from where City of College Station control monument no. 122 bears N 5° 55' 09" E — 1053.8 feet*; Thence S 49° 03' 25" E — 113.91 feet*, along the northeast line of the said Vizu tract, to a 1/2" iron rod found at its east corner on the northwest prescriptive right-of-way line of Gilbert Street; Thence S 42° 44' 02" E — 30.12 feet*, across said Gilbert Street, to a 1/2" iron rod with a blue plastic cap stamped "KERR SURVEYING" found at the north corner of that 0.232 acre zoning tract described in the City of College Station Ordinance 2023-4481; Thence S 41° 22' 48" W— 115.00 feet*, along the southeast boundary of said Gilbert Street, to a 1/2" iron rod with an orange plastic cap stamped "H.P.MAYO RPLS 5045" found (set in 2003) at the west corner of the said 0.232 acre zoning tract; Thence S 48° 12' 57" E — 87.80 feet*, along the southwest line of the said 0.232 acre zoning tract, also being the northeast boundary of Turner Street, to a 1/2" iron rod with a blue plastic cap stamped "KERR SURVEYING" found at the south corner of the said 0.232 acre zoning tract; Thence N 41 ° 22' 48" E — 115.00 feet*, along the southeast boundary of the said 0.232 acre zoning tract, to a 1/2" iron rod with a blue plastic cap stamped "KERR SURVEYING" found at its east corner; Thence S 48° 11' 17" E — 207.94 feet*, along the northeast lines of that 0.198 acre tract described in the deed to Ali Jaffar recorded in volume 19079, page 239, that 0.66 acre tract described in the deed to Ali Jaffar recorded in volume 9225, page 145, and that 0.132 acre tract described in the deed to Sivas, LLC recorded in volume 19219, page 66 in the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, and continuing to the most easterly corner of this described zoning tract in the northwest line of Lot 2 of a Part of Lots 7, 8, 9 & 10 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 516, page 717 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas; Thence S 41 ° 26' 42" W— 128.21 feet* along the said northwest line of Lot 2, to the most southerly corner of this described zoning tract; Thence N 49° 00' 00" W— 440.05 feet*, approximately along the middle of the pavement of Turner Street, to the most westerly corner of this described zoning tract; Rezoning Area `SS" (along Turner Street) Page 1 of2 1701 Southwest Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77840 I 979,693 2777 I TxSury F-10030200 1 BaselineSurveyors.net Page 157 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4549 Page 5 of 7 BASELINE Thence N 41° 37' 42" E — 135.54 feet*, along the common boundary of the tracts conveyed to Ronnie Watson by deed recorded in volume 13805, page 86, and the said Vizu tract, with that tract conveyed to Arthur and Nancy Wright Family Limited Partnership by deed recorded in volume 2686, page 109 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, to the Point of Beginning and containing 1.10 acres of land more or less. Bearings and *distances are Texas State Plane, Central Zone NAD83 datum, determined by GPS and checked between City of College Station control monuments no. 120 and no. 122 (N 17° 03' 41" W). Approximate surface distances can be computed by multiplying these provided grid distances by an average combined scale factor of 1.000100. This document was prepared under 22 Texas Administrative Code §138.95, does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey, and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivision for which it was prepared. See survey exhibit plat dated June 2024. HENRY P MAYO 5045 v,: F39t0?P Qr V SB vEI Rezoning Area "SS' {along Turner Street) Page 2 of 2 1701 Southwest Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77840 I 979.690 2777 I TxSury F-10030200 I BaselineSurveyors,net Page 158 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4549 Page 6 of 7 Live Oak Street Found Monument Legend KERR 'blue' — 1/21R found w/blue plastic cap stamped "KERR SURVEYING" KERR 'yellow' — 1/2"IR found w/yellow plastic cap stamped "KERR 4502" MAYO — 1/2"IR found (set 2003) w/orange plastic cap stamped "H.P.MAYO RPLS 5045" June 2024 Ash Street 2 7's 1 100 120 Ft Bearings and distances are Texas State Plane, Central Zone NAD83 datum, determined by GPS and checked between City of College Station control monuments no. 120 and no, 122 (N 17'03'41" W). Approximate surface distances are in parenthesis, based on an averagecombinedscalefactorof1.000100. See separate metes and bounds description prepared with this plat. This document was prepared under 22 Texas Administrative Code §138.9.5, does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey, and is not to be used to convey or establish interests In real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivision for which it was prepared. Arthur and Nancy Wright Family Limited Partnership southeast one—half of Lot 21 vol. 2686, pg. 109 N 41'37'42n E 135.54' (135.55') Ronnie Watson vol. 13805 pg. 86 Area "SS" 1.10 acres Gilbert Street (rem. of) 18 acres preecrrprwc R&.W.1 vol. 81, pg. 587 44O-0 S 41'22'48" W r 1 15.00' (115.01') existing MH Zoning per Ordinance 2023-4481 Salam Investments, LLC 0.13 acre vol. 13901, pg. 36 Ali Jaffar 0.198 acre vol. 19079, pg. 239 current ownership unknown) Sivas, LLC 0.132 acre vol. 19219, pg. 66 Survey Control Note: City of CS GPS monument no. 122 bears N W55'09"E-1053_B', 1653.9' surface distance) from the Point of Beginning (F.O.B.) N 4137'42"E-129.2'* Brenda D. Hawkins Gwendolyn J. Hawkins Eilly D. Hawkins 0.3379 acre vol. 15568, pg. 175 Gilbert Street prescriptive R.aW.) Ali Jaffar 0.098 acre vol. 19021, pg. 71 Partisan Rock Properties, LLC 0.12 acre vol. 1792B, pg. 258 Lot 12 D.A. Smith Subdivision vol. 49 m pg. 106 L & T Stone Properties, L.L.C. 0.18 acre ol. 8418, pg. 292 Dean T. Crooks end Loren T. Crooks 0.144 acre vol. 16518, pg. 22 Jimmy Byrd, Sean McKeon Darren McKeon 0.12 acre vol. 18880, pg. 171 N 41'26'42"E-11 6.2'* Proposed Rezoning Area "SS" Portion of Lot 12 D.A. Smith Subdivision College Station, Texas Page 159 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-4549 Page 7 of 7 Exhibit B EXISTING Zoning General Cpommereial High Density Multi -Family 9sF s General Suburban General y; Suburban tee` General Suburban Aq sl High Occupancy 9s Overlay F9sl PROPOSED Zoning A General9sspSuburban sr Page 160 of 414 ORDINANCE NO.2025-4583 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," ARTICLE 4 "ZONING DISTRICTS," SECTION 4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FROM PDD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 1.152 ACRES AT 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, AND 110-119 KNOX DRIVE, BEING LOTS 18-27, BLOCK 29 AND LOTS 12-16, BLOCK 31 OF THE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION PHASE 401 AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine ofnot less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 161 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4583 Page 2 of 4 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 27th day of March, 2025. ATTEST: Apyvor I n- City Secretary M APPROVED: I,c,sut' 00LAU, City Attorney Page 162 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4583 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit A That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: LOTS 18-27, BLOCK 29 AND LOTS 12-16, BLOCK 31 OF THE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION PHASE 401 Page 163 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4583 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B Page 164 of 414 ORDINANCE NO.2025-4584 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," ARTICLE 4 "ZONING DISTRICTS," SECTION 4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FROM PDD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.412 ACRES AT 418, 420, 422, 424, AND 426 BABY BEAR DRIVE, BEING LOTS 1-5, BLOCK 32 OF THE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION PHASE 109 AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine ofnot less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 165 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4584 Page 2 of 4 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 27th day of March, 2025. ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED: I LSU(, (PIA,ifft,A, Ciiy Attorney APP VE D: M° or Page 166 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4584 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit A That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: LOTS 1-5, BLOCK 32 OF THE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION PHASE 109 Page 167 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4584 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B Page 168 of 414 ORDINANCE NO.2025-4585 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE," ARTICLE 4 "ZONING DISTRICTS," SECTION 4.2, "OFFICIAL ZONING MAP" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FROM PDD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO MH MIDDLE HOUSING AND HOO HIGH OCCUPANCY OVERLAY FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.406 ACRES AT 133, 135, 137, 139, AND 141 DEACON DRIVE WEST, BEING LOTS 1-5, BLOCK 21 OF THE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION PHASE 107 AS DESCRIBED BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine ofnot less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 169 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4585 Page 2 of 4 PASSED, ADOPTED, and APPROVED this 27th day of March, 2025. ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED: I LSU(, (PIA,ifft,A, Ciiy Attorney APP VE D: M° or Page 170 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4585 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit A That Appendix A "Unified Development Ordinance," Article 4 "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2, Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned from PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay: LOTS 1-5, BLOCK 21 OF THE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION PHASE 107 Page 171 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-4585 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B Page 172 of 414 City-Initiated Rezoning Proposed Area "SS" (along Turner Street) Portion of Lot 12, D.A. Smith Subdivision College Station, Texas June 2024 BASELINE All of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being a portion of Lot 12 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and the northeast half (approximate) of the adjoining right-of-way of Turner Street, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of this described zoning tract, at a 1/2" iron rod found at the north corner of that 0.1307 acre tract described in the deed to Vizu, LP recorded in volume 11166, page 270 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, from where City of College Station control monument no. 122 bears N 5° 55' 09" E -1053.8 feet*; Thence S 49° 03' 25" E -113. 91 feet*, along the northeast line of the said Vizu tract, to a 1 /2" iron rod found at its east corner on the northwest prescriptive right-of-way line of Gilbert Street; Thence S 42° 44' 02" E -30.12 feet*, across said Gilbert Street, to a 1/2" iron rod with a blue plastic cap stamped "KERR SURVEYING" found at the north corner of that 0.232 acre zoning tract described in the City of College Station Ordinance 2023-4481; Thence S 41 ° 22' 48" W -115.00 feet*, along the southeast boundary of said Gilbert Street, to a 1/2" iron rod with an orange plastic cap stamped "HP.MAYO RPLS 5045" found (set in 2003) at the west corner of the said 0.232 acre zoning tract; Thence S 48° 12' 57" E-87.80 feet*, along the southwest line of the said 0.232 acre zoning tract, also being the northeast boundary of Turner Street, to a 1/2" iron rod with a blue plastic cap stamped "KERR SURVEYING" found at the south corner of the said 0.232 acre zoning tract; Thence N 41 ° 22' 48" E -115.00 feet*, along the southeast boundary of the said 0.232 acre zoning tract, to a 1/2" iron rod with a blue plastic cap stamped "KERR SURVEYING" found at its east corner; Thence S 48° 11' 17" E-207.94 feet*, along the northeast lines of that 0.198 acre tract described in the deed to Ali Jaffar recorded in volume 19079, page 239, that 0.66 acre tract described in the deed to Ali Jaffar recorded in volume 9225, page 145, and that 0.132 acre tract described in the deed to Sivas, LLC recorded in volume 19219, page 66 in the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, and continuing to the most easterly corner of this described zoning tract in the northwest line of Lot 2 of a Part of Lots 7, 8, 9 & 10 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 516, page 717 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas; Thence S 41 ° 26' 42" W-128.21 feet* along the said northwest line of Lot 2, to the most southerly corner of this described zoning tract; Thence N 49° 00' 00" W-440.05 feet*, approximately along the middle of the pavement of Turner Street, to the most westerly corner of this described zoning tract; Rezoning Area "SS" (along Turner Street) Page 1 of 2 1701 Southwest Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77840 I 979.693.2777 I TxSurv F-10030200 I BaselineSurveyors.net Page 190 of 414 BASELINE Thence N 41° 37' 42" E -135.54 feet*, along the common boundary of the tracts conveyed to Ronnie Watson by deed recorded in volume 13805, page 86, and the said Vizu tract, with that tract conveyed to Arthur and Nancy Wright Family Limited Partnership by deed recorded in volume 2686, page 109 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, to the Point of Beginning and containing 1.10 acres of land more or less. Bearings and *distances are Texas State Plane, Central Zone NAD83 datum, determined by GPS and checked between City of College Station control monuments no. 120 and no. 122 (N 17° 03' 41" W). Approximate surface distances can be computed by multiplying these provided grid distances by an average combined scale factor of 1.000100. This document was prepared under 22 Texas Administrative Code §138.95, does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey, and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivision for which it was prepared. See survey exhibit plat dated June 2024. Rezoning Area "SS" (along Turner Street) Page 2 of 2 1701 Southwest Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77840 I 979.693.2777 I TxSurv F-10030200 I BaselineSurveyors.net Page 191 of 414 Page 192 of 414 City-Initiated Rezoning Proposed Area "O" (Richards St. & Sterling St. area) Richards Subdivision College Station, Texas May 2024 BASELINE All of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Morgan Rector league, abstract no. 46, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including portions of the Richards Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 137, page 25 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and subsequent replats of portions of it, and generally being the majority of the properties which front on Richards Street, Crest Street and Sterling Street, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly corner of this described zoning boundary at intersection of the southeast boundary of the said Richards Subdivision (vol. 137, pg. 25) and the current northeast right-of-way boundary of Texas Avenue (Business Highway 6), being the south corner of Lot 22A Marin Acres, as described by plat recorded in volume 11036, page 27 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, from where City of College Station control monument no. 120 bears S 30° 01 ' 36" W-3568.9 feet*; Thence along the said northeast right-of-way boundary of Texas Avenue, and crossing Sterling Street and Richards Street, as follows: N 49° 30' 38" W -88.90 feet*, N 51 ° 58' 58" W -57 .03 feet*, N 49° 30' 38" W -182.33 feet*, N 47 ° 33' 49" W-72.39 feet*, and N 49° 30 ' 38" W-92.58 feet to the most westerly corner of this described zoning boundary; Thence N 41 ° 31 ' 53" E -1865.30 feet*, along the northwest boundary of the said Richards Subdivision (vol. 137, pg. 25), to its intersection with the southwest boundary of Holleman Place Subdivision as described by replat recorded in volume 19006, page 228 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas; Thence S 49° 11 ' 54 " E -4.18 feet* to the common corner of Lot 1 R-1 Rand Lot 1 R-2R of said Holleman Place Subdivision; Thence N 41 ° 29' 41 " E -155. 50 feet* through said Holleman Place Subdivision along the southeast line of said Lot 1 R-1 R to its common corner with Lot 1 R-4R; Thence S 49° 25' 42" E -124.50 feet*, along the common line of Lot 1 R-4R and Lot 2R of Holleman Place Subdivision, passing at 99 .99 feet the common corner of said Lots, to a point in the middle of Richards Street; Thence N 41 ° 30' 00" E -719. 7 4 feet*, along the middle of Richards Street to the most northerly corner of this described zoning boundary; Thence S 48° 15' 19" E -382.17 feet*, along the northwest boundary of Block Three of the Richards Subdivision as described by replat recorded in volume 481 , page 67 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, to the east corner of Lot 6 of said Block Three, also being the most easterly corner of this described zoning boundary; Rezoning Area "O" (Richards St. & Sterling St. area) Page 1 of 2 1701 Southwest Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77840 979.693.2777 I TxSurv F-10030200 BaselineSurveyors.net Page 195 of 414 BASELINE Thence S 41 ° 57' 29" W -244 .39 feet* and S 42° 14' 23" W -335.48 feet*, along the southeast boundary of the said Richards Subdivision (vol. 137, pg. 25), to the east corner of the Parulian Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 12824, page 30 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas; Thence N 48° 01 ' 38" W -122. 70 feet* along the northeast line of the said Parulian Subdivision and continuing to the point in the middle of Sterling Street; Thence S 41 ° 45' 00" W -410 .17 feet* along the middle of Sterling Street to a point for corner; Thence S 48° 07' 21" E -120.09 feet*, mostly along the southwest line of the said Parulian Subdivision to its south corner; Thence S 41 ° 45' 57" W -17 42.52 feet*, along the said southwest boundary of the Richards Subdivision (vol. 137, pg . 25) and several subdivisions within it, to the Point of Beginning and containing 28 .15 acres of land more or less. Bearings and *distances are Texas State Plane, Central Zone NAD83 datum, determined by GPS and checked between City of College Station control monuments no. 120 and no. 122 (N 17° 03' 41" W). Approximate surface distances can be computed by multiplying these provided grid distances by an average combined scale factor of 1.000100. • This document was prepared under 22 Texas Administrative Code § 138. 95, does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey, and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivision for which it was prepared. See survey exhibit plat dated May 2024. Rezoning Area "O" (Richards St. & Sterling St. area) Page 2 of 2 1701 Southwest Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77840 I 979.693.2777 I TxSurv F-10030200 I BaselineSurveyors.net Page 196 of 414 Page 197 of 414 Page 198 of 414 Page 200 of 414 Page 201 of 414 Page 202 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.13. Removal of The Planning and Zoning Commission as Designated Impact Fee Advisory Committee Sponsor: Carol Cotter Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 2, “Development Review Bodies,” Section 2.2, “Planning and Zoning Commission,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, regarding the removal of the Planning and Zoning Commission’s designation as the Impact Fee Advisory Committee. Case #ORDA2025-000008. (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 25, 2025 City Council Meeting – subject to change.) Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Financially Sustainable City, • Core Services and Infrastructure, • Diverse Growing Economy, and • Improving Mobility Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this Ordinance amendment. Summary: In its regular session earlier this summer, the 89th Texas Legislature passed SB 1883, amending Chapter 395 of The Local Government Code. The bill revised requirements relating to the implementation and administration of impact fees, including removal of the authority of a political subdivision’s Planning and Zoning Commission to act as the Impact Fee Advisory Committee. Currently, the Planning and Zoning Commission, with the addition of representative ad HOC members, is the designated Impact Fee Advisory Committee. This Ordinance amendment is the first step in aligning our local code with the new state law and ensures compliance moving forward. Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance Amendment - Planning and Zoning Commission 2. Section 2.2. Planning and Zoning Commission Red Lines Page 207 of 414 Ordinance Form 8-14-17 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A, “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” ARTICLE 2, “DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BODIES,” SECTION 2.2, “PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP AND POWERS AND DUTIES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 2, “Development Review Bodies,” Section 2.2, “Planning and Zoning Commission,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional, the invalidity or unconstitutionality does not affect other provisions or application of this Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, that can be given effect without the invalid or unconstitutional provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. PART 3: That any person, corporation, organization, government, governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association and any other legal entity violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) and not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) for a violation of fire safety, zoning, or public health and sanitation ordinances, other than the dumping of refuse. Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. PART 4: This Ordinance is a penal ordinance and becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by City of College Station Charter Section 35. Page 208 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. ___________ Page 2 of 3 Ordinance Form 8-14-17 PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this ________ day of _____________________, 2025. ATTEST: APPROVED: _____________________________ _____________________________ City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney Page 209 of 414 ORDINANCE NO. ___________ Page 3 of 3 Ordinance Form 8-14-17 Exhibit A That Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 2, “Development Review Bodies,” Section 2.2. “Planning and Zoning Commission”, Subsection B.1, “Number, Appointment”, and Subsection D.2, “Recommendations”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended to read as follows: B. Membership and Terms 1. Number, Appointment. A Planning and Zoning Commission is hereby created to consist of seven (7) members. Members shall be residents of the City of College Station and eligible voters. D. Powers and Duties. 2. Recommendations. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review and make recommendations to the City Council subject to the terms and conditions set forth for such uses in this UDO for the following: a. Conditional use permits; b. Zoning Map amendments (rezonings); c. Concept plans for P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use Districts and PDD Planned Development Districts; d. Unified Development Ordinance text amendments; e. Comprehensive Plan amendments; f. Annexations; and g. Petitions to form a municipal utility district. Page 210 of 414 Created: 2025-06-18 08:25:36 [EST] (Supp. No. 9, Update 1) Page 1 of 2 Sec. 2.2. Planning and Zoning Commission. A. Creation. The City Council shall provide for the appointment of a Planning and Zoning Commission and the regulations and restrictions adopted shall be pursuant to the provisions of applicable statutory requirements of the State of Texas. B. Membership and Terms. 1. Number, Appointment. A Planning and Zoning Commission is hereby created to consist of seven (7) members. Members shall be residents of the City of College Station and eligible voters. Additionally, one (1) or more ad hoc members may be appointed as needed or desired to review impact fee land use assumptions and capital improvements plans and to perform such other duties in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended. 2. Terms. The term of office is three (3) years. 3. Term Limits. Terms of office shall be limited to six (6) consecutive years. 4. Vacancies. Vacancies shall be filled by the City Council for the unexpired term of any member whose position becomes vacant. C. Officers, Meetings, Quorum. 1. Officers. A chairperson shall be appointed annually by the City Council. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall select a vice-chairperson from among its members as needed. 2. Meetings. Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall meet regularly, and the chairperson shall designate the time and place of such meetings. All meetings of the Commission where a quorum is present shall be open to the public. 3. Quorum. Four (4) members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business. Any recommendation advanced to the City Council without a majority of positive votes from those members present shall be deemed a negative report. 4. Rules of Proceeding. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall adopt its own rules of procedure. 5. Minutes. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon each question, or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating that fact and shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be immediately filed in the Planning and Development Services Department and shall be a public record. Page 211 of 414 Created: 2025-06-18 08:25:36 [EST] (Supp. No. 9, Update 1) Page 2 of 2 D. Powers and Duties. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the following powers and duties: 1. Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make recommendations for the effective coordination of the various City departments, committees, and boards, in implementing the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Recommendations. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review and make recommendations to the City Council subject to the terms and conditions set forth for such uses in this UDO for the following: a. Conditional use permits; b. Official Zoning Map amendments (rezonings); c. Concept plans for P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use Districts and PDD Planned Development Districts; d. Unified Development Ordinance text amendments; e. Comprehensive Plan amendments; f. Impact fee land use decisions and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) priorities; g. Annexations; and h. Petitions to form a municipal utility district. 3. Final Action. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hear and take final action on the following: a. Applicable appeals of decisions of the Design Review Board; b. Preliminary plans and plats not approved by staff as set forth in the Plats Section in Article 3, Development Review Procedures of this UDO; c. Waivers of the standards in Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements of this UDO; d. Appeal of the Administrator's determination of a development exaction; e. Appeal of the Administrator's denial of a plat; f. Appeal of the Administrator's determination regarding the applicability of plat requirements; g. Appeal of the Administrator's denial of an alternative parking plan; and h. Appeal of the Administrator's interpretation of the provisions of Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements of this UDO. E. Staff. 1. The Administrator shall provide staff to the Planning and Zoning Commission as needed. 2. Where ministerial acts have not been completed, the staff shall ensure that the changes to plats are completed as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. (Ord. No. 2023-4453, Pt. 1(Exh. A), 8-10-2023) Page 212 of 414 September 18, 2025 Item No. 5.14. Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Evaluation & Appraisal Report (2025) Sponsor: Christine Leal, Long Range Planning Administrator Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Evaluation & Appraisal Report and associated appendices. Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Good Governance • Financially Sustainable City • Core Services and Infrastructure • Neighborhood Integrity • Diverse Growing Economy • Improving Mobility • Sustainable City Recommendation(s): Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Commission receive and recommend acceptance of the Report. The City Council will receive this report at their September 25, 2025 meeting. Summary: College Station’s Comprehensive Plan, adopted in May 2009 and updated in October 2021, serves as a statement of the community’s vision for the future. As a long-range document with an anticipated life span of 20 years, the Comprehensive Plan calls for an Evaluation and Appraisal Report to be prepared every five years. This report was created by City staff with input from citizens, City leaders, various City departments, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and other appropriate boards and commissions. The purpose of this report is to serve as a “checkup” on the Comprehensive Plan by identifying the Plan’s successes and shortcomings and recommending appropriate modifications in response to changing conditions. This report and its associated appendices: • Provides a review of the basic conditions and assumptions related to the City’s growth. • Evaluates implementation progress related to the Plan’s goals, strategies, and action items. • Summarizes the public engagement process and results used to inform the recommendations in this report. • Provides recommendations for modifications to the Plan’s policies, action items, and structure to ensure continued alignment with the community’s vision. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Comprehensive Plan 5-Yr Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2025 2. Appendix A - 2024 Existing Conditions Report 3. Appendix B - Implementation Progress Report 4. Appendix C - Engagement Report Page 213 of 414 Page 214 of 414 5-YEAR EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2025 Page 215 of 414 PART I: INTRODUCTION...................................................................... 3 Overview and Purpose...................................................................................................... 3 Process............................................................................................................................. 3 Changing Conditions........................................................................................................ 4 Plan Successes.................................................................................................................. 4 Interim Comprehensive Plan Amendments........................................................................ 5 Unified Development Ordinance Amendments................................................................. 7 PART II: GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS..........................................10 A. Stronger emphasis on sustainability and environmental resilience B. Add an “as of” date to all maps and data tables C. Remove repeated or redundant narrative throughout the Plan D. Incorporate strategies to ensure rapid response to changes in technology PART III: RECOMMENDATIONS BY CHAPTER................................. 11 Chapter 1: Plan Foundation.............................................................................................. 11 Chapter 2: Distinctive Places............................................................................................. 11 Chapter 3: Strong Neighborhoods..................................................................................... 11 Chapter 4: A Prosperous Economy..................................................................................... 12 Chapter 5: Engaging Spaces............................................................................................. 12 Chapter 6: Integrated Mobility.......................................................................................... 12 Chapter 7: Exceptional Services........................................................................................ 12 Chapter 8: Managed Growth............................................................................................ 13 Chapter 9: Collaborative Partnerships................................................................................ 13 Chapter 10: Plan Implementation..................................................................................... 13 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................... 15 Appendix A: 2024 Existing Conditions Report Appendix B: Implementation Progress Report Appendix C: Engagement Report CONTENTS Page 216 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |3 PART I: INTRODUCTION 1. OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE College Station’s Comprehensive Plan, adopted in May 2009 and updated in October 2021, serves as a statement of the community’s vision for the future. It provides goals, policies, and actions on a broad range of topics and provides strategic direction to guide the City’s physical growth while maintaining a high quality of life. As a long-range document with an anticipated life span of 20 years, the Comprehensive Plan calls for an Evaluation and Appraisal Report to be prepared every five years. This report was created by City staff with input from citizens, City leaders, various City departments, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and other appropriate boards and commissions. The purpose of this report is to serve as a “checkup” on the Comprehensive Plan by identifying the Plan’s successes and shortcomings and recommending appropriate modifications in response to changing conditions. This report and its associated appendices: • Provides a review of the basic conditions and assumptions related to the City’s growth. • Evaluates implementation progress related to the Plan’s goals, strategies, and action items. • Summarizes the public engagement process and results used to inform the recommendations in this report. • Provides recommendations for modifications to the Plan’s policies, action items, and structure to ensure continued alignment with the community’s vision. 2. PROCESS This 5-year Evaluation and Appraisal process, branded the Five Years Forward project, began in February 2025 and concluded in September 2025. A six-member group called the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation Committee (CPEC) met throughout the process to provide input and feedback to guide both the evaluation process and final recommendations. The CPEC was composed of three Planning and Zoning Commissioners and three City Councilmembers. Public outreach activities: • Community Planning Survey 2025 (135 responses) • Focus Groups – Medical, Housing, and Business & Economy sectors • Public Meetings & Workshops – Seminar Supper, Open House, City Council public hearing • Informal Events – Three Food Truck Wednesdays • Digital & Media Outreach – Blog, radio, podcast, website, social media, and public notices Other community stakeholder input activities: • Boards & Commissions Survey and feedback discussions • City Councilmember structured interviews • Staff implementation team discussions Details of the community and stakeholder input processes can be found in Appendix C: Engagement Report. Page 217 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |4 3. CHANGING CONDITIONS In 2024, City staff prepared an assessment of existing conditions to provide context for the Comprehensive Plan evaluation. This assessment, presented in Appendix A: 2024 Existing Conditions Report, analyzes population growth and projections, demographic and socioeconomic trends, existing land use, and other patterns of physical development. The report draws primarily on the latest estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau, along with data from various City databases. As the City looks to the future, significant conditions and trends include: Demographics & Growth •The population of College Station reached 128,370 in 2023, reflecting a 7.9% increase since 2019. •The Census Bureau estimated 48,615 College Station residents were enrolled in college or graduate school in 2023,representing about 38% of the city’s total population (ACS 2023). Economic Development •The employment rate in the College Station-Bryan MSA has increased by 16.2% since 2018, outpacing state and nationalaverages. •The unemployment rate remains low at 3.2% (2023), reflecting a stable job market. •The housing market has seen rising home prices, with the median home price of $322,903 in 2023. Land Use •Residential land use dominates at 45.54%, with single-family homes making up the largest share of the residential category. •Urban residential and mixed residential land uses account for 15.3% of future land use. •Between 2019-2023, multi-family led in units constructed totaling 2,963 units. Transportation & Mobility •Currently, the city maintains 57.7 miles of bike lanes, 21.2 miles of bike routes, 387.7 miles of sidewalks, and 40.6 miles ofmultiuse paths, supporting active transportation options. •Roadway improvements and infrastructure investments are planned to accommodate growth. 4. PLAN SUCCESSES The Comprehensive Plan’s Implementation chapter establishes a framework for ongoing reporting and evaluation. Each year, the City produces a summary report highlighting notable progress and development activity. Every five years, a more comprehensive evaluation (such as this report) is conducted and often results in amendments to the Plan. As part of this evaluation and appraisal process, a 5-Year Implementation Progress Report (Appendix C) was completed to assess the status of each action item in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff used status categories from the City’s implementation tracking software, AchieveIt, to classify each item as On Track, Off Track, At Risk, Not Started, or Achieved. Over the past five years, the City celebrated several key programming achievements and capital project milestones. To encourage responsible growth and support community character, staff developed the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan (2023) and the Wellborn District Plan (2023). To address the City’s growing need for affordable housing, staff collaborated with a citizen steering committee to create the 2024 Housing Action Plan. In 2024, two major tree-planting projects added 117 trees in Bee Creek Park and Tarrow Park, helping to mitigate the urban heat island effect. Additionally, the City broke ground for Fire Station #7 in 2025, ensuring the continued provision of exceptional services. Page 218 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |5 5. INTERIM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS a. Small Area Plans ACTIVE PLANS Plan Name Created Planning Horizon City Department Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan 2023 2023-2023 Planning & Development Services Wellborn District Plan 2023 2023-2023 Planning & Development Services RETIRED PLANS Plan Name Created Planning Horizon Retired Central College Station Master Plan 2010 2010-2017 2022 Small Area Plan Audit Eastgate Neighborhood Plan 2011 2011-2018 2022 Small Area Plan Audit Southside Area Neighborhood Plan 2012 2012-2019 2022 Small Area Plan Audit South Knoll Plan 2013 2013-2020 2022 Small Area Plan Audit Wellborn Community Plan 2013 2013-2023 2023 Wellborn District Plan Update Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan 1987 Unspecified 2022 Small Area Plan Audit Northgate Redevelopment Plan 1996 Unspecified 2022 Small Area Plan Audit Northgate Redevelopment Implementation Plan 2003 Unspecified 2022 Small Area Plan Audit Medical District Master Plan 2012 2012-2022 2022 Small Area Plan Audit b. Master Plans Master Plan Name Created Last Update Adoption City Department Housing Action Plan 2024 September 2024 Planning & Development Services Economic Development Master Plan 2013 May 2020*Economic Development Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan 2010 May 2018*Planning & Development Services Wastewater System Master Plan 2011 April 2017 CSU Water Services Water System Master Plan 2010 April 2017 CSU Water Services Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces Master Plan 2011 July 2011*Parks & Recreation * Plan update in progress at the time of this report Page 219 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |6 c. Special Projects Project Name Created Cooling College Station 2022 Small Area Plan Audit Phase I 2022 Small Area Plan Audit Phase II 2024 2024 Existing Conditions Report 2024 Greater Northgate Small Area Plan Engagement Report 2025 d. Text Amendments • Chapter 2. Distinctive Places by amending the text regarding the Neighborhood Center future land use description, intent, and generally appropriate zoning districts – Ordinance 4351, dated April 28, 2022. • Chapter 2. Distinctive Places by amending the text regarding the Planning Areas description to remove expired plans – Ordinance 4404, dated November 10, 2022. • Chapter 2. Distinctive Places by amending the text regarding the Planning Areas description to rename the Texas Avenue & University Drive (FM 60) Redevelopment Area to the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan – Ordinance 4470, dated September 28, 2023. • Chapter 2. Distinctive Places by amending the text regarding the Planning Areas description to update it to the Wellborn District Plan, to revise the Future Land Use & Character descriptions to remove the Wellborn future land use and incorporate it and the Wellborn-specific zoning districts into the Neighborhood Commercial, Suburban Residential, and Estate Residential future land use descriptions and generally appropriate zoning districts – Ordinance 4474, dated October 12, 2023. e. Planning Areas Map Amendments • Removing the Central College Station Neighborhood Plan, Eastgate Neighborhood Plan, Southside Area Neighborhood Plan, and South Knoll Neighborhood Plan – Ordinance 4404, dated November 10, 2022. • Renaming the Texas Avenue & University Drive (FM 60) Redevelopment Area to the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan – Ordinance 4470, dated September 28, 2023. • Renaming the Wellborn Community Plan to the Wellborn District Plan – Ordinance 4474, dated October 12, 2023. f. Future Land Use & Character Map Amendments • Approximately 5 acres of land generally located at 2354 Barron Road from Suburban Residential to Neighborhood Commercial – Ordinance 4365, dated June 23, 2022. • Approximately 17 acres of land generally located at 400 Double Mountain Road from Medical to Urban Residential – Ordinance 4378, dated August 11, 2022. • Approximately 0.19 acres of land generally located at 106 Southland Street from Suburban Residential to Neighborhood Commercial – Ordinance 4388, dated September 8, 2022. • Approximately 2.611 acres of land, generally located at 100 - 170 Graham Road from Business Center to Neighborhood Commercial – Ordinance 4435, dated May 15, 2023. • Amended as shown in the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan – Ordinance 4470, dated September 28, 2023. • Amended as shown in the Wellborn District Plan – Ordinance 4474, dated October 12, 2023. Page 220 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |7 • Approximately 3.25 acres of land generally located west of the intersection of Nantucket Drive and State Highway 6 S from Suburban Residential and Natural and Open Areas to Neighborhood Commercial and Natural and Open Areas – Ordinance 4520, dated May 23, 2024. • Approximately 3 acres of land generally located at located at 116 and 120 Morgans Lane from Urban Residential to General Commercial – Ordinance 4525, dated June 27, 2024. • Approximately 11 acres of land generally located at 3182 Holleman Drive South from Mixed Residential and Natural & Open Areas to Urban Residential – Ordinance 4566, dated December 12, 2024. • Approximately 1.047 acres of land generally located at 3423 Cain Road and 3197 Holleman Drive South from Mixed Residential to General Commercial – Ordinance 4571, dated January 23, 2025. • Approximately 3.60 acres of land generally located at 3768 McCullough Road from Estate Residential to Neighborhood Commercial – Ordinance 4578, dated February 27, 2025 • Approximately 2.752 acres of land generally located at 2360 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South from General Commercial to Urban Residential – Ordinance 4596, dated June 12, 2025 • Approximately 2.5 acres generally located south of the intersection of University Drive East and East Crest Drive – Ordinance 4609, dated August 14, 2025. g. Functional Classification & Context Class Map • Amended as shown in the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan – Ordinance 4470, dated September 28, 2023. • Amended as shown in the Wellborn District Plan – Ordinance 4474, dated October 12, 2023. 5. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) AMENDMENTS Conditional Use Permits and Nonconforming Uses (2024) Modifies conditional use permit requirements and the expiration of conditional use permits and nonconforming uses, and requires nightclubs, bars, and taverns in NG-1 and NG-2 to follow the conditional use permit process. Ownership Certification (2024) Removes the requirement for developers to dedicate ROW to the City in fee-simple. Platting Authority (2024) Delegates to City staff the ability to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove a plat that meets all minimum subdivision requirements. Flood Ordinance Amendment (2023) Modifies the current ordinance to include requirements for replacement of manufactured homes in existing manufactured home developments. Shared Housing (2023) Modifies the current ordinance to permit Shared Housing uses in the MH Middle Housing zoning district only when there is also a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. Middle Housing Zoning District Parking (2023) Modifies the current ordinance to allow up to four vehicles to park in the front yard area of a lot that is zoned MH Middle Housing. Also, clarifies access requirements for parking in the rear yard area. High Occupancy Overlay (HOO) (2023) Creates a new overlay zoning district that allows Shared Housing uses. Page 221 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |8 UDO Housekeeping (2023) Provides amendments to the UDO for clarity and consistency. Edits include internal and external policy references, reorganization, capitalization, acronyms, numbers, tables, and images. No policy changes were made with this ordinance amendment.” Off-Street Parking Requirements (2023) Amends Sections 5.8.B Northgate by adding tandem parking as a design option for structured parking garages. Amends Section 7.2.J Bicycle Facilities by removing bicycle requirements and placing them in Section 7.3. And finally amends Section 7.3 by adding in bicycle parking, updating minimum and maximum ratios, removing minimum parking requirements from redevelopment areas, and adding additional reductions to parking requirements. Lot-by-Lot Grading (2023) Creates a requirement that single family construction must account for, and provide, lot grading information to mitigate drainage issues between properties upon redeveloped and initial development. Conditional Use Permit for Nightclubs, Bars, Taverns (2023) Amends Conditional Use processing, specifically giving the UDO Administrator the ability to approve minor changes to a Conditional Use permit, stating the duration of a Conditional Use permit, giving the City the ability to temporarily suspend a Conditional Use for public health and safety reasons, clarifying how a violation of the terms of a Conditional Use permit is unlawful, and establishing a process to revoke a Conditional Use permit. Sunsetting Small Area Plans (2022) Amends the Dimensions, Access, and Location section of the Off-Street Parking Standards to be applicable to properties that are designated as Redevelopment Areas on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. Sidewalks (2022) Amends Sidewalks section of the Subdivision Regulations to reduce the number of zones for fee in lieu of sidewalk construction to four, adds an appeals process, allows staff to require fee in lieu, and requires sidewalks along thoroughfares in rural context areas. Single-Family Overlay Amendment (ROO & NCO) (2022) Amends the single-family overlay application process for the Restricted Occupancy Overlay (ROO) and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO) to allow multiple contiguous phases of original subdivisions to apply jointly, submit one application, and pay one application fee. Middle Housing (2022) Creates a new Middle Housing zoning district, which allows for a flexible mix of housing types between single-family homes and multiplexes and establishes development standards for each housing type. Shared Housing (2022) Creates a new use known as Shared Housing, which allows for more than four unrelated persons to occupy a single dwelling unit, establishes which zoning districts the use is allowed in, establishes development standards for the use, and eliminates the Northgate High Density Dwelling Unit use. Cluster Subdivisions (2022) Amends the Cluster Developments section of the Unified Development Ordinance to reduce the minimum lot width and depth of a residential lot and increase the amount of required open space. Page 222 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |9 Parkland Dedication (2022) Eliminates the distinction between community and neighborhood parks for dedication purposes, reduces the number of parkland dedication zones to four, adds an appeals process, allows developers of private parks to receive up to a 25% credit, and updates the dedication and fee amounts. Zoning Board of Adjustment Power, Duties, and Processes (2022) Updates the processes involved with written interpretations, variances, and administrative appeals to align with H.B. 1475 and H.B. 2497 adopted in the 86th and 87th Texas Legislatures, respectively, and amends the Unified Development Ordinance’s list of power and duties of the Board to reflect all power and duties that have been assigned to the Board throughout the Code of Ordinances. Shared Mobility (2022) Renames the ordinance from Dockless Bike Share Program to Shared Micromobility, allows shared electric micromobility devices (bicycles and scooters), includes an abandonment fee if an operator leaves the community without taking their devices and further defines geofence zones. It also now includes requirements for cyber liability insurance, a 15-mph speed limit for devices, rebalancing, parking hubs and devices must be locked to a bicycle rack or operator designated parking area. Comprehensive Plan Notifications (2021) Requires mailed notices for property-specific Comprehensive Plan Amendments to the Future Land Use & Character Map, as well as neighborhood meetings for these proposed amendments. Limits the timeframe in which Comprehensive Plan Amendment applications may be submitted during major Comprehensive Plan updates and evaluations. Restricted Occupancy Overlay (ROO) (2021) Creates a new overlay zoning option for single-family subdivisions to restrict occupancy to no more than two unrelated persons. An application for a ROO requires a majority (50% + one) of a subdivision’s property owners to sign a petition supporting the application. A legacy (grandfather) clause allows existing occupancy levels up to four unrelated persons to continue under certain conditions. The city’s existing restrictions of no more than four unrelated persons remain for all areas without the overlay. Related and Family Definition (2020) Addresses public concern regarding the restrictive nature of the definitions of “family” and “related” and modernize the ordinance in accordance with legal precedent. The proposed amendment creates a more permissive definition of “family” that removes language referring to degrees of consanguinity (blood relation) and affinity (marriage relation), clarifies specific familial types, and codifies a new method of counting relationships to ensure a maximum of one family unit and three unrelated individuals will be allowed per dwelling unit. Replat Notification Requirements (2020) Adds the option to Specific Notice Requirements for the City to notify neighboring property owners of the Planning & Zoning Commission’s approval of certain replats in lieu of holding public hearings for the replats. This option was adopted by the 86th Texas Legislature in response to concerns that public hearings were required for replats that state statute requires the Planning & Zoning Commission to approve. Page 223 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |10 PART II: GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS A. Stronger emphasis on sustainability and environmental resilience. Goals and action items related to sustainability, environmental resilience, and natural resource stewardship are incorporated in most chapters of the Plan. However, while some chapters include strong contextual narrative detailing the City’s specific strategies and actions in these areas, others do not. • Chapter 2 (Distinctive Places) and Chapter 8 (Managed Growth) should include more detailed narrative on the City’s efforts to promote environmental stewardship and resilience, particularly in the context of growth and ongoing development/redevelopment. B. Add an “as of” date to all maps. While most maps in the Comprehensive Plan remain unchanged after the Plan is adopted, certain maps are updated on a rolling basis. Maps that are regularly updated, such as Map 2.2 Future Land Use and Character, are available on the City’s website and may differ from the version included in the adopted Plan document. • To avoid potential confusion, all maps in the adopted Plan should include a clearly visible “as of” date. C. Remove repeated or redundant narrative throughout the Plan. Some content is unnecessarily repeated across chapters, which reduces the Plan’s overall clarity and conciseness. To improve readability, duplicated narrative should be removed where it does not add distinct value. • Example: Chapter 8, pp. 138–141. This section repeats content directly from Chapter 7: Exceptional Services. The intended purpose of its use in Chapter 8 is to emphasize that infrastructure to support high-quality City services must keep pace with growth. This point can be effectively conveyed in a brief summary, rather than repeating several pages of identical text from the previous chapter. D. Incorporate strategies to ensure rapid response to changes in technology. Stakeholders did not express concern that the City was lagging in response to technological changes, and they did not call for specific changes to the Plan to address this recommendation. Stakeholders simply emphasized that rapid changes in technology should be considered as the City plans for the future, particularly in terms of municipal service delivery and transportation/micro-mobility options. Page 224 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |11 PART III: RECOMMENDATIONS BY CHAPTER CHAPTER 1: PLAN FOUNDATION Recommendations for Chapter 1 are administrative in nature and primarily related to updating contextual narrative and outdated data. • Update Background Section. • Update Planning Process and Public Participation. ◦Shorten and summarize text related to 10-Year Update and add information on the current 5-Year Evaluation Process. • Update Figure 1.2 - Replace “District & Neighborhood Plans” with “Small Area Plans.” • Update the summary of existing conditions with current data. • Update Chapter 10 description to explain the difference between ongoing action items and strategic action items. CHAPTER 2: DISTINCTIVE PLACES • Update Table 2.1 Summary of Future Land Use Acreages. • Update the Planning Areas section to remove retired small area plans and update descriptions to reflect planning activities since the adoption of the Plan. • Update Map 2.1 to reflect changes to the Planning Areas. ◦Remove retired Plans (Medical District). ◦Expand Harvey Road Redevelopment planning area to set northern boundary at Dominik Drive. ◦Update Lick Creek Corridor Planning Area to remove the small portion that projects to the southwest. • Update to Map 2.2 - Future Land Use & Character. ◦Incorporate any Future Land Use changes since the last Plan update. ◦Convert the Future Land Use designation to Parks & Greenways for any parkland dedicated to the City since the last Plan update. ◦Remove the Future Land Use designation from any thoroughfares constructed since the last Plan update. • Continue to enhance City outreach and communication efforts to help residents and property owners better understand land use vs. zoning and how the Comprehensive Plan shapes development decisions. CHAPTER 3: STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS • Update and consolidate existing conditions data to highlight housing demand, availability, affordability, and quality. • Edit references to obsolete zoning tool: Restricted Occupancy Overlay (ROO). ◦Incorporate narrative on the City’s efforts to meet the community’s diverse housing needs through the adoption of the Middle Housing MH zoning district. This section should also provide background on the development of ROOs and Housing Occupancy Overlays (HOOs), as well as state legislation that eliminated the City’s authority to use these tools. • Incorporate narrative on the development and adoption of the Housing Action Plan (2024), as well as its ongoing implementation guided by the Housing Plan Advisory Committee. • Include the term student housing or make it clear that housing for students should be a significant consideration in the housing needs of the community. • Continue to explore new tools for neighborhood conservation and density management to balance growth pressures with community character. Page 225 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |12 CHAPTER 4: PROSPEROUS ECONOMY The recommendations related to Chapter 4 stem from stakeholder concerns that the City’s economic development strategies are either hidden or appear to be deprioritized within the Comprehensive Plan. Rather than drafting separate goals and strategies that may not align precisely with the Economic Development Master Plan, it is recommended that additional narrative and action items from the master plan be incorporated directly into the body of Chapter 4. • Following the adoption of the updated Economic Development Master Plan (anticipated in late 2025), incorporate its goals, strategies, and action items into the body of Chapter 4, include strategies to: ◦Attract businesses that add value to the community and clarity around the types of businesses the City is pursuing. ◦Address changing workforce development needs with an emphasis on local talent retention and jobs that do not necessarily require a four-year degree. CHAPTER 5: ENGAGING SPACES Feedback related to parks, recreational spaces, and natural areas was generally positive, with stakeholders expressing a strong desire to see continued prioritization of efforts that support these valued community spaces and programs. • Update Map 5.1 ◦Include new parks and areas of parkland dedication. • Edit section “Coordination, Collaboration, and Adequate Funding” to include the City’s approach to maintaining high quality parks through micro-capital investments. • Continue to ensure planning efforts consider ways to support the park system with a focus on connectivity to parks, trail expansions, and preservation of natural areas in growth areas. CHAPTER 6: INTEGRATED MOBILITY • Remove Map 6.1 ◦This map is intended to illustrate how the City’s transportation network could evolve by 2045; however, it does not dictate how roads must be built as development occurs—that is determined by the functional classification of roads (Map 6.3). This distinction has caused confusion among developers and residents. As a result, it is recommended that the map be removed. • Evaluate appropriateness of the Thoroughfare Plan and recommend any necessary amendments in the following areas: ◦Pebble Creek Parkway – During the evaluation process, residents of the Pebble Creek neighborhood expressed concerns regarding the proposed extension and expansion of Pebble Creek Parkway, as shown in the adopted Thoroughfare Plan. Residents stated that any extension or expansion of Pebble Creek Parkway would negatively impact their neighborhood and overall quality of life. The Comprehensive Plan Evaluation Committee recommended that the appropriateness of this segment of the Thoroughfare Plan be evaluated. • Continue to expand pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, transit service, and regional mobility improvements. ◦Mircomobility trends that include e-scooters and related electric personal transportation devices should be addressed in the Active Transportation Master Plan (Update to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan, May 2018). CHAPTER 7: EXCEPTIONAL SERVICES Stakeholders expressed overall satisfaction with City services and did not recommend specific changes to this chapter of the Plan. However, across most stakeholder groups, there was strong emphasis on the City remaining vigilant in maintaining high service levels as the population grows, as well as ensuring the long-term availability of water and reliable electricity. • Continue to ensure the Plan and associated Master Plans accurately project out future service level adjustments to keep pace with growth and available resources, particularly for electric and water services. Page 226 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |13 CHAPTER 8: MANAGED GROWTH Recommendations for Chapter 8 primarily address state legislation that has further limited Texas municipalities’ ability to manage orderly growth and development in areas surrounding the community. • Update the chapter to reflect legislative changes (SB 2038, 88th Legislative Session) that allow property owners to petition for release from the ETJ. ◦Include discussion of the potential for future annexation of substandard developments. ◦Include discussion on the impact new ETJ development may have on existing ETJ residents. • Remove Map 8.1 & Table 8.1 ◦Due to several state legislative changes since 2019, this map and table are obsolete and no longer reflective of the City’s approach to managing and anticipating growth. • Clarify how the 11 criteria for annexation (listed under Table 8.1) would be used to evaluate a request for voluntary annexation. CHAPTER 9: COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS While no changes to the City’s current strategy or approach to partnerships were recommended, stakeholders across multiple feedback channels emphasized that maintaining collaborative relationships should remain a high priority, particularly with Texas A&M University. • Continue to maintain strong intergovernmental partnerships and stay agile to legislative changes impacting planning tools. CHAPTER 10: PLAN IMPLEMENTATION • Clearly outline in the Comprehensive Plan and UDO Annual Review which action items have dedicated funding sources and specify their funding timeframes. • Update Table 10.1 Action Plan & Funding Sources ◦Re-evaluate the category each action item is sorted into: (1) Ongoing and (2) Strategic; add text that explains the difference between the two categories ◦Action Item 3.12 is repeated in the Implementation Plan; replace second entry with action item 3.13. ◦Rewrite action items: ▪To combine items that are essentially the same in terms of desired outcome and implementation. ▫Example: Action Item 9.3 & 9.5 are assigned to the City Manager’s Office and both focus on maintaining a consistent relationship with the university through ongoing meetings and committees. In each reporting update, staff provide almost identical information for both items, indicating that they are essentially the same in implementation. ▪To clarify the item’s intent and align with specific staff responsibilities for implementation. ▫Example: Action Item 5.1 is carried out by City Parks & Recreation staff through sports and special events programming. However, the current wording includes three parts, also involving Economic Development & Tourism and promoting special districts as places to live, work, and play. Staff consider this action item to represent two distinct tasks that should be separated and assigned to the appropriate City departments. Page 227 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT |14 ◦Reassign action items: ▪To align with updates to the organizational structure or naming conventions. ▫Dissolution of the Community Services Department: Action items previously assigned to the Community Services Department should be redistributed to Planning & Development Services, the Fire Department, and Economic Development. ▪To accurately reflect the department leading implementation of the action item ▫Example: Action Item 2.7 - Reassign this action item to the Planning & Development Services Department. In practice, the planning department reviews development plans to ensure required parks and mobility connections are incorporated during development. The implementation plan should be updated to reflect this practice. ▫Example: Action Item 9.6 – Reassign this action item to Neighborhood Services. In the implementation plan, this action item is assigned to both Community Services and Neighborhood Services, while in the project management software it is assigned solely to Community Services. However, both departments agree that this initiative is led and managed by Neighborhood Services. Page 228 of 414 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION COMMITTEE City Council RepresentativesMelissa McIlhaneyScott ShaferMark Smith Planning and Zoning Commission RepresentativesMichael BuckleyWarren FinchTreVion Watson CITY COUNCIL John Nichols, MayorMark Smith, Place 1William Wright, Place 2David White, Place 3Melissa McIlhaney, Place 4Bob Yancy, Place 5Scott Shafer, Place 6 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Jason Cornelius (Chair)David HigdonMarcus ChaloupkaAron CollinsWarren FinchMichael Wayne BuckleyTreVion Watson PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Anthony Armstrong, Director of Planning & Development ServicesMolly Hitchcock, Assistant Director of Planning & Development ServicesChristine Leal, Long Range Planning Administrator – Project ManagerHeather Wade, Principal Planner - Long Range PlanningAshley Klein, Staff Planner - Long Range PlanningJason Schubert, Transportation Planning AdministratorJesse Dimeolo, Senior Planner - Transportation & Mobility PlanningCarl Ahrens, Staff Planner - Transportation & Mobility PlanningJoseph Allen, Staff Planner - Transportation & Mobility PlanningRobin Macias, Land Development Review AdministratorCarol Cotter, City EngineerJulie Svetlik, GIS AnalystChris Griffin, GIS AnalystKristen Hejny, Administrative Support SpecialistDavid Brower, Community Development AdministratorRaney Whitwell, Community Development Analyst STAFF RESOURCE TEAM Bryan Woods, City ManagerJeff Capps, Deputy City ManagerJeff Kersten, Assistant City ManagerJennifer Prochazka, Assistant City ManagerRoss Brady, Chief of StaffBarbara Moore, University & Community Relations ManagerMichael Ostrowski, Chief Development OfficerBrian Piscacek, Assistant Director of Economic DevelopmentKelsey Heiden, Director of Parks & RecreationJennifer Cain, Director of Capital Projects and Facility ManagementEmily Fisher, Director of Public WorksGary Mechler, Director of Water ServicesStephen Maldonado, Jr., Assistant Director of Water ServicesSam Rivera, Chief Information OfficerRichard Mann, Chief of Fire and Emergency Medical ServicesBilly Couch, Police ChiefCollin Killian, Director of Public Communications PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Bobbie Lehrmann, Assistant Director of Public CommunicationsJoelene Tomecek, Multimedia ManagerLucero Valenzuela, Multimedia CoordinatorCarlos Elarba, Website Coordinator ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to the citizens, civic organizations, and community leaders who participated in this evaluation and appraisal process. This report would not be possible without your input and support. A special thanks to the following contributors for their many hours of service in preparing this report. Page 229 of 414 EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Page 230 of 414 Contents INTRODUCTION NATURAL ENVIRONMENT DEMOGRAPHICS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LAND USE PUBLIC FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION NEXT STEPS REFERENCES 3 7 10 27 40 56 75 91 93 Page 231 of 414 As part of the development and periodic evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan, it is important to have a foundation on which to base future expectations. The Existing Conditions Report is updated approximately every five years to assess the changing conditions in the community and inform future planning efforts. The 2024 Existing Conditions Report provides a snapshot of the current conditions that exist in College Station between 2019 and 2023. This report includes current conditions and trends for the following key areas: local context, natural environment, demographics, economic development, land use, public facilities, and transportation. The city looks at these key areas holistically to determine the appropriate expectations and direction of the Comprehensive Plan, including its implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. INTRODUCTION 3 Page 232 of 414 Location College Station is a city in Brazos County, situated at the eastern edge of the Central Texas region. Located in the center of the Texas Triangle, College Station is within a three-hour drive of five of the nation’s 20 largest cities: Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Austin, and Fort Worth. (Figure 1). College Station is positioned along State Highway 6 running north and south and in near proximity to State Highway 21 running west and east. Commuting to the larger cities (especially the Houston and Austin metro areas) and/ or telecommuting from College Station is an increasing reality for residents. The City encompasses approximately 51.2 square miles and has an Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of 160.87 square miles. In 2018, when the City’s population exceeded 100,000 residents, the City’s ETJ expanded in accordance with Chapter 42 of the Texas Local Government Code. Currently, the City’s ETJ extends five miles from the City limits, except where it abuts the City of Bryan and where the two cities have negotiated their ETJ’s. The City shares a portion of its northern city limit line with the City of Bryan, and together the two cities form the core of the College Station-Bryan Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The College Station-Bryan MSA is made up of Brazos, Burleson, and Robertson Counties and is home to approximately 278,000 residents. It is the 14th largest MSA in Texas and ranks fifth in the state for percent change in population, showing an 18.6% growth in population between 2012 and 2022 (Table 1). Table 1: Population by Metropolitan Statistical Area, Texas, 2012 vs. 2022 Ranked by Percent Change; Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Population and Housing Unit Estimates Program; Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts analysis Top 10 fastest growing Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Texas Percent Change from 2012 to 2022 Texas MSA Total Change Percent Change Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos 586,254 32.0% Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 1,299,166 19.6% San Antonio-New Braunfels 418,266 18.7% Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 1,158,391 18.7% College Station-Bryan 43,636 18.6% Sherman-Denison 21,265 17.4% Killeen-Temple 72,525 17.1% Midland 24,875 16.3% Tyler 27,098 12.6% Odessa 16,397 11.3% College Station is home to the main campus of Texas A&M University, the flagship institution of the Texas A&M University System. In the fall of 2023, 68,115 students attended the College Station campus1. Texas A&M University is the oldest public institution of higher education in Texas, and the Texas A&M University Foundation had over $3.2 billion dollars of endowment in 2023. The university has a triple designation as a land, sea, and space grant institution, reflecting the broad scope of the research endeavors it brings to the city, including ongoing projects funded by agencies such as NASA, the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and the Office of Naval Research. Figure 1:The cities and counties in or near the Texas Triangle, a megaregion of the U.S. state of Texas; Source: Planning and Development Services 2024 1 Includes Distance Education students.4 Page 233 of 414 History The City of College Station is a young municipality, with its beginnings in the founding of Texas A&M College in 1876. Because of the school’s isolation, school administrators provided facilities for those who were associated with the College and the campus became the focal point of community development. The area was designated “College Station, Texas” by the Postal Service in 1877, who derived the name from the train station located to the west of the campus. Growth of both the community and College influenced residents’ desire to create a municipal government. The City of College Station was incorporated in 1938 as a result of a petition by 23 men representing on and off-campus interests to the Board of Directors of Texas A&M. College Station witnessed growth to the north, east and south during the 1940s; however, the city’s status as a general law city limited officials’ ability to annex territory. Without a city charter, the council could only annex property in areas where residents petitioned for inclusion into the city limits. While the home rule amendment from 1912 allowed Texas cities with at least 5,000 inhabitants the legal right to compose and amend their own charters, College Station did not meet the required population threshold until the late 1940s. The City was the first general law city in the state to employ a City Manager in the 1940s and employed a “business manager” before that. The 1950 Census recorded College Station’s population at 7,268, and on January 8, 1952, residents voted 220-11 to adopt a home rule charter with a council- manager form of government. The City first adopted zoning regulations in 1940, shortly after incorporation, to encourage orderly and desired growth of the City. The City began formal planning for growth and development in the 1960s. The Comprehensive Plan The City of College Station aims to be a vibrant, forward-thinking, knowledge-based community, that promotes the highest quality of life for its residents and visitors. City leaders, stakeholders, and staff strive toward creating distinctive places, strong neighborhoods, a prosperous economy, engaging spaces, integrated mobility, exceptional services, managed growth, and collaborative partnerships. This vision and associated aspirations are laid out in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Figure 2: City Aspirations 5 Page 234 of 414 College Station’s third Comprehensive Plan was originally adopted in May 2009 after thousands of hours of citizen participation. The plan covered a 20-year horizon and guided the city’s growth and development. The 2009 Comprehensive Plan was conceived as a “living document” and recommended that the City regularly evaluate and update the Plan as conditions change in the community. In 2019, City leadership and staff launched the 10-year evaluation of the plan – branded The Next 10 – that engaged over 800 citizens and stakeholders across the community and culminated in the 10- Year Evaluation & Appraisal Report. The report, officially adopted by the City Council in October 2020, recommended modifications to the Comprehensive Plan in response to changing conditions. Throughout 2021, City staff implemented the recommended changes which included revisions to goals, policies, actions, narrative, and maps, as well as the maps in associated master plans. The City Council adopted the updated Comprehensive Plan in October 2021. Recognitions and Rankings In recent years, College Station has received many national recognitions and rankings in a variety of economic and social categories. Since 2019, College Station has gradually risen in the ranking for many quality-of-life metrics related to public schools, raising a family, and retirement. The City of College Station is also recognized as a high performing organization by several national accreditation agencies. Currently the City is among a small group of municipalities in Texas to simultaneously have national accreditations in police, fire, public safety communications, parks and recreation, water, and public works. The City of College Station boasts a long history of planning excellence. In 2024, the City was recognized for the 18th year by the Richard R. Lillie FAICP Planning Excellence Program. This program recognizes municipalities that take a wholistic approach to community planning. The City is also known for its award- winning Comprehensive Plan, which was awarded the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Award by the Texas Chapter of the American Planning Association and the Central Texas section of the Texas APA Chapter. These two awards recognized the City’s Comprehensive Plan for advancing “the science and art of planning.” 6 Page 235 of 414 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Climate and Weather Located about 367-feet above sea level, College Station has a subtropical and temperate climate. The winters are mild with periods of low temperatures that usually last less than two months (Figure 3). Snow and ice are rare, but several winter storms, including 2021 Winter Storm Uri, have changed the average snowfall. Summers are hot and humid with the primary variation in weather being occasional rain showers (Figure 3). Annual high temperature 79°F Annual low temperature 59°F Average annual precip.40.06” inch Figure 3: Average Temperatures and Precipitation by Month; Source: U.S. Climate Data Average precipitation (inches) Average high (°F) Average low (°F)Temperature (°F)Precipitation (Inches)Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 3.246141 2.856544 3.177251 2.667958 4.338667 4.459273 2.149575 2.689674 3.189169 4.918160 3.227151 3.236242 7 Page 236 of 414 Soils According to the United States Department of Agriculture’s 2008 (spatial) and 2012 (tabular) Soil Survey of Brazos County, Texas, its soils are affected by post oak savannah (creating light and sandy soil with dense clay subsoil less than a foot under the surface) and prairie vegetation (creating dark loams and clays). Most of the city is comprised of loamy soil that has high shrink-swell, potentially creating challenges to foundation work necessary for urban development. Land around the floodplains is predominantly sandy and loamy, also impacting the shrinking and swelling of the soil. The floodplains consist of loamy and clayey soils that are not considered appropriate for urban development (See Figure 4). 052.5 Miles BRAZOS COUNTY SOILS ROBERTSONCOUNTY MADISONCOUNTY GRIMESCOUNTY WASHINGTONCOUNTY BURLESONCOUNTY UPLAND SOILS STREAM TERRACE SOILS FLOODPLAIN SOILS DATA SOURCE: USDA COLLEGESTATIONCOLLEGESTATION BRYANBRYAN Ecoregion College Station is in the East Central Texas Plains, also known as the Post Oak Savannah or the Texas Claypan Area. The terrain of the Post Oak Savannah ranges from nearly flat to irregular rolling plains, and the landscape is moderately dissected by a low density of streams, flowing into several broad river systems. The City of College Station is flanked by the Brazos River to the southwest and Navasota River to the east, with the natural topography ranging from gently hilly in the center of town to relatively level terrain along the Brazos and Navasota River floodplains. The undeveloped landscape is characterized by a mosaic of post oak woodland and grassland. Drought, grazing, and fire are the primary natural processes that have affected this ecoregion over time. Historically, this region would have experienced frequent low-intensity fire, maintaining the savannah structure with large mature trees and an understory of grasses. The combination of fire suppression and heavy livestock grazing has increased the cover of low-growing woody plants with poor fire-resistance, particularly Eastern Red Cedar and Honey Mesquite. Figure 4: Brazos County Soils 8 Page 237 of 414 BBRRAAZZOOSS RRII VVEE RRBRAZOSRIVE R NANAVVASASOOTATARRII VVERERNAVASOTARI VERDATA SOURCE: FEMA 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN CITY LIMITS RIVERS & STREAMS ETJ GRIMESCOUNTY BURLESONCOUNTY BRAZOSCOUNTY 021Miles Floodplain The city resides in the Region 8 Lower Brazos Flood Planning Region as identified by the Texas Water Development Board. The Lower Brazos Region encompasses approximately 23,442 square miles and includes 30 major lakes and reservoirs. The Lower Brazos River runs west of College Station, along the border between Brazos County and Burleson County, on its way to the coast, where it enters the Gulf of Mexico near Lake Jackson and Freeport. A network of waterways exists throughout the City of College Station. The largest is Carter Creek, with Wolf Pen Creek, Bee Creek, Lick Creek, Spring Creek, and Alum Creek running into it. There are approximately 3,959.30 acres of floodplain in the City limits, which accounts for 8.3 % of the city’s land area. The City employs development standards, future land use planning, and zoning provisions to protect and preserve the natural function of the floodplains. The future land use designation of Natural & Open Areas and the zoning district of Natural Areas Protected (NAP) are used to conserve natural areas and provide conveyance of floodwaters. Currently, 87.7 acres of floodplains are preserved in College Station through Natural Areas Protected (NAP) zoning. Additionally, the City proactively purchased a number of properties in the floodplain in order to mitigate disruptions to natural conveyance structures. Currently, the City of College Station owns 803.6 acres of floodplain in the City limits; most of this land is programed as city parks, greenways, and open spaces for the public’s enjoyment. The City’s floodplain management program helps citizens minimize flood-related property damage as well as protect water quality, provide ideal wildlife habitat, and maintain dynamic travel corridors. The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) has designated the College Station as a Class-6 Community in recognition of the city’s flood management efforts beyond the minimum National Flood Insurance Program standards. Subsequently, the flood insurance rates in College Station have been reduced by twenty (20) percent for structures in Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA) and ten (10) percent in all areas outside of the SFHA since 2020. Figure 5: Floodplain Map of College Station9 Page 238 of 414 DEMOGRAPHICS Population The estimated population of College Station as of December 2023 was 128,370 (Planning and Development Services, 2024). Over the last five years, the City’s population grew by approximately 7.9%, with an average annual growth rate of 1.5% (Table 2). This slower growth rate reflects the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly through reduced student movement and the shift to distance learning during 2020 and early 2021. 10 Page 239 of 414 Table 2: College Station Population 2009-2023; Source: Planning and Development Services Year Estimated Population Annual Growth Rate 5-Year Growth Rate 2009 93,450 2.81% 10.1% 2010 94,929 1.58% 2011 96,767 1.94% 2012 98,085 1.36% 2013 100,096 2.05% 2014 102,332 2.23% 18.9% 2015 106,581 4.15% 2016 109,927 3.14% 2017 116,893 6.34% 2018 118,967 1.77% 2019 121,489 2.12% 7.9% 2020 122,085 0.49% 2021 124,511 1.99% 2022 126,005 1.20% 2023 128,370 1.88% The City’s population estimates are calculated by adding projected population growth to a base number; typically, the population estimate from the most recent decennial census. Population growth is calculated by multiplying the number of demolition permits and recently issued residential certificates of occupancy by a multiplier. The multiplier is based on the average household size and occupancy rate from the most recent American Community Survey data releases. 11 Page 240 of 414 Growth Projections for 2030 Population projections for College Station were conducted at 2%, 2.5%, and 3% annual growth rates. Figure 7 compares trends and projections for 2030 against those from 2018 and 2023. Between 2014 and 2018, the City experienced an 18.9% growth rate, which influenced higher projections for 2030. However, the 2020 dip in growth altered this trajectory, leading to more conservative estimates. Figure 6: 2030 Population Projections for College Station; Source: Planning and Development Services STATE AND REGIONAL PROJECTIONS In 2022, the Texas State Demographer projected the state’s population to reach between 44.4 million and 54.4 million by 2060. For Brazos County, the conservative estimate was 356,762, with a high-end projection of 458,282 (Figure 6). The College Station-Bryan metropolitan area is expected to grow to 424,700 by 2060, ranking 36th among 384 U.S. metropolitan areas (Stebbins, 2022). 200,000 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2018 Projections 2023 Projections Recorded Population 109,927(2016) 128,370(2023) 3.0%, 156,7172.5%, 151,6532.0%, 146,729 12 Page 241 of 414 Density The mean population density by block group in College Station is 8.75 people per acre, with the densest block group reaching 31 people per acre. Figure 7 illustrates population density across the City, where red areas indicate high-density zones, and green areas represent lower-density regions. Figure 7: Population Density by Block Group, 2022 5-Year Estimate Age Distribution The demographic structure of College Station reflects its status as a university town, with 25.6% of the population aged 20-24. Adjacent age groups (15-19 and 25-29) also constitute notable segments, highlighting the City’s youthful character. Conversely, individuals aged 60 and above represent 11.2% of the population, with those 75 and older accounting for only 3%. The City’s 2023 population pyramid shows the largest proportion of residents in the university-age cohort. Comparisons with 2018 reveal stable trends, but notable increases in the 85+ and 50-54 age groups. 021Miles POPULATION DENSITY DATA SOURCE: ACS 2022 5-YEAR ESTIMATES MID POPULATION DENSITYPER SQUARE MILE LOW HIGH 13 Page 242 of 414 Figure 8: College Station Population Pyramid. 2023 1-Year Estimate Figure 9: Percent Population Change by Age Category 2018-2023; Source: U.S. Census Bureau 85 years and over 80 to 84 years 75 to 79 years 70 to 74 years 65 to 69 years 60 to 64 years 55 to 59 years 50 to 54 years 45 to 49 years 40 to 44 years 35 to 39 years 30 to 34 years 25 to 29 years 20 to 24 years 15 to 19 years 10 to 14 years 5 to 9 years Under 5 years 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 Female Male 85 years and over 80 to 84 years 75 to 79 years 70 to 74 years 65 to 69 years 60 to 64 years 55 to 59 years 50 to 54 years 45 to 49 years 40 to 44 years 35 to 39 years 30 to 34 years 25 to 29 years 20 to 24 years 15 to 19 years 10 to 14 years 5 to 9 years Under 5 years -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% -27.9% -17.5% -6.2% -20.5% -1.6% -0.3% 77.2% 25.0% 18.0% 19.2% 15.1% 48.7% 31.4% 13.8% 1.5% 21.8% 22.0% 17.4% 14 Page 243 of 414 Ethnicity and Race As of 2023, 89.1% of College Station’s population identified as one race, while 10.9% identified as two or more races. The racial composition includes 67% White, 8.8% Black, 9.6% Asian, and 3.3% “some other race.” Hispanic or Latino residents comprise 18.4% of the population. Between 2010 and 2023, the Black, Hispanic, Asian, and “some other race” populations grew significantly, with increases of 56.9%, 84.5%, 34.3%, and 34.9%, respectively (Table 3). Approximately 22.3% of residents speak a language other than English at home, with Spanish (11%), Indo- European languages (5.3%), and Asian/Pacific Islander languages (4.3%) being the most common. White Asian Black or African American Some other race American Indian and Alaska Native Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 67.0% 9.6% 8.8% 3.3% 0.3% 0.1% Figure 10: 2023 Race and Ethnicity; Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2023 5-Year Estimates Table 3: College Station Race and Ethnicity 2010-2023; Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate Race/Ethnicity 2010 2023 Numerical Change Percent Change White 72,502 81,524 9,002 12.42% Black 6,383 10,068 3,632 56.90% Asian 8,576 11,573 2,942 34.31% Hispanic 13,165 24,329 11,123 84.49% Some Other Race 4,361 5,884 1,523 34.92% 15 Page 244 of 414 Education EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT A substantial portion of College Station’s population is highly educated. As of 2023, 59.1% of residents held a bachelor’s degree or higher, while 5.7% had an associate’s degree. Around 11% of the population was enrolled in K-12 schools. College students represent a significant demographic, with 35% of the total population enrolled in undergraduate or graduate programs. Figure 11: Educational Attainment; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate HIGHER EDUCATION ENROLLMENT The growth of Texas A&M University significantly influences College Station’s population trends. Since the 1960s, the university’s expanded enrollment, including the removal of its 50,000-student cap, has driven demographic changes. In 2024, the University’s Capacity Study recommended pausing undergraduate growth for five years due to infrastructure constraints. Figure 12: exas A&M University Fall Enrollment; Source: Texas A&M University Office of Academic and Business Performance Analytics: Note: In 2013, Texas A&M added the School of Law campus enrollment to its enrollment counts. In 2014, the university added Galveston, Qatar, and other campuses to the enrollment count. Graduate or professional degree Bachelor’s degree Associate’s degree Some college, no degree High school or equivalent degree 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 26.80% 32.30% 5.70% 15.50% 14.40% 2018 Projections 2023 Projections Recorded Population 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1923 1933 1943 1953 1963 1973 1983 1993 2003 2013 2023 16 Page 245 of 414 Enrollment figures increased from 56,948 in 2014 to 71,127 in 2023, due to the university including other campuses in its enrollment counts, such as Qatar and the School of Law, and the removal of the 50,000 student enrollment cap. The College Station student enrollment in the fall 2023 semester was 68,115. Table 4: College Station Campus In Person Fall Enrollment Student Headcount; Source: Texas A&M University Fall Term Students* 2020 63,280 2021 64,902 2022 65,914 2023 68,115 *Note: Enrollment numbers include both in person and distance education students enrolled at College Station campus. Blinn College, though smaller, also impacts the local student population. From 2019 to 2023, Texas A&M University saw a 9% enrollment increase. Campuses in the City of Bryan, Blinn College and Texas A&M Health Science Center, experienced a 5.7% decline and 19.6% increase, respectively, during the same period (Table 5). Table 5: Institutions of Higher Education and Enrollments, Fall 2019 and Fall 2023; Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Institution Institution Type Fall 2019 Enrollment Fall 2023 Enrollment* Percent Change in Enrollment Texas A&M University University 63,859 69,598 9.0% Blinn College District*Junior or Community College 14,082 9,905 -29.7% Texas A&M Health Science Center Health Science School 2,887 3,454 19.6% Total N/A 135,079 138,320 2.4% 17 Page 246 of 414 MAIN CAMPUS1 ANIMAL SCIENCE COMPLEX2 HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER3 4 RELLIS CAMPUS 5 BLINN COLLEGE W SH 21 FM 60SH 4 7 S H 6 SH 30 HIGHER EDUCATION S H 6 DATA SOURCE: TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY & BLINN COLLEGE 0 2.51.25 Miles 1 2 3 4 5 EASTERWOOD AIRPORT TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY PROPERTY BLINN COLLEGE PROPERTY COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS BRYAN CITY LIMITS Figure 13: Map of Texas A&M University Property; Source: Planning and Development Services Page 247 of 414 Income The 2023 median household income in College Station was $47,632, significantly lower than Texas’ median of $75,780. Poverty rates vary by age, with 13.5% of children, 36.8% of working-age adults, and 9.6% of seniors living below the poverty line. Family households have a median income of $91,354, while married- couple families earn significantly more at $112,420. Nonfamily households report a much lower median income of $31,102. Figure 14: Median Income in the Past 12 Months Comparisons; Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2023 1-Year Estimate Vulnerable Populations In College Station, several factors contribute to the vulnerability of specific population groups, including children, the elderly, non-English speakers, individuals with disabilities, and those living below the income poverty threshold. Notably, 7.3% of the City’s population lacks health insurance, limiting access to essential healthcare services. Approximately 22.3% of residents speak a language other than English at home, with Spanish being the most common (11%) (Figure 15). Of those who speak a non-English language, 5.4% report speaking English less than “very well.” Figure 15: Language Spoken at Home; Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 College Station $91,354 $112,420 $31,102 Brazos County $85,214 $107,292 $35,412 Texas $91,467 $109,997 $47,822 Families Married-couple familiesNonfamily households Faimilies Married-couple families Nonfamily households English only Spanish Other Indo-European languages Asian and Pacific Islander languages Other languages 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 1.70% 4.30% 5.30% 11.00% 77.70% 19 Page 248 of 414 Approximately 8.8% of the total population (11,023 people) has a disability. Disability types were categorized across age groups, reflecting varying impacts. Figure 16: Population with a Disability by Type; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate Household Size and Composition Data on household composition and occupancy patterns in College Station highlights the diversity of living arrangements and housing units, reflecting the City’s demographic makeup, substantial student population, and variety of household types. HOUSEHOLDS AND FAMILY COMPOSITION College Station is home to approximately 47,029 households, with 35.4% consisting of married couples, 29.9% of male householders without spouses or partners, and 29.7% of female householders in similar circumstances. Individuals living alone represent 17.8% of households, with only 3.4% involving individuals aged 65 or older living alone. Additionally, 22.7% of households include children under 18 years old, and 14.7% have members aged 65 or older. The average household size is 2.37, slightly lower than the average family size of 3.05. HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND OCCUPANCY Occupied housing units in College Station predominantly consist of smaller households. Single-person households account for 31.5% of all units, with renters representing a significant majority (37.5%) compared to owners (20.4%). Two-person households are also prevalent, making up 32.9% of all units, with a more balanced distribution between owner-occupied (35.4%) and renter-occupied (31.6%) units. Larger households with four or more occupants are more common among homeowners (24.8%) compared to renters (16.7%), indicating that larger family units are more likely to own their homes. 2.30% 2.40% 3.90% 3.40% 1.80% 3.50%Independent living diiculty Self-care diiculty Ambulatory diiculty Cognitive diiculty Vision diiculty Hearing diiculty 20 Page 249 of 414 FAMILY AND NONFAMILY HOUSEHOLDS Figure 17: Households by Type; Source: U.S. Census Bureau Family households make up 45.6% of all housing units, with significant differences between owner- occupied and renter-occupied units. Among owner-occupied housing, 76.0% are family households, while renters are predominantly nonfamily households (70.7%). Married-couple families dominate the family household category for owners (68.8%), whereas renters have higher shares of other family types (11.8%) and single-parent households. Nonfamily households form the majority (54.4%) of all housing units, with renters accounting for 70.7% of this group. Single-person households (37.5% of renters) are particularly common, consistent with a student- oriented rental market. Renters are also more likely to live with roommates or other nonfamily members (33.2%) compared to homeowners (3.6%). PRESENCE OF CHILDREN Figure 18: Household Composition – Children, Source: U.S. Census Bureau Family households with children are more common among homeowners. Approximately 22.3% of households have children under 18, with 35.7% of owner-occupied units falling into this category compared to 15.1% of renter-occupied units. Renters with children are more likely to have younger children, whereas homeowners are more likely to have children aged 6 to 17 years. Texas College-Station Bryan MSA College Station 67.4% 32.6% 55.9% 44.1% 45.6% 54.4% Family Households Non-family Households Households with Children under 18 Households without Children under 18 21.0% 79.0% 23.2% 76.8% 2023 2018 21 Page 250 of 414 RENTER- VS. OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING The data reflects a clear divide between owner-occupied and renter-occupied housing in College Station. Renters dominate the housing landscape, particularly among younger, smaller households and nonfamily living arrangements, indicative of the university influence on the local housing market. Meanwhile, owner- occupied housing has more families, older residents, and larger households. These trends highlight the unique housing dynamics shaped by the city’s diverse population and economic drivers. Figure 19: Owner vs Renter Occupied Housing Units Comparisons; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimates A clear divide exists between owner-occupied and renter-occupied housing in College Station. Renters dominate the housing landscape, particularly among younger, smaller households and nonfamily living arrangements, reflecting the influence of the local university. Owner-occupied housing is more prevalent among families, older residents, and larger households, underscoring the varied housing dynamics shaped by the city’s diverse population and economic drivers. Texas College Station - Bryan MSA College Station Owner Occupied Renter Occupied 62.5% 37.4% 50.2% 49.8% 34.9% 65.1% Housing STOCK AND INVENTORY From 2019 to 2023, completed residential construction permits fluctuated across housing types. Single- family detached homes dominated, peaking at 548 permits in 2022. Overall, completed residential permits increased from 2019 to 2023, peaking at a total of 621 residential permits completed in 2023. In the five- year report period, a total number of 2,718 permits were completed all the way through the certificate of occupancy process, comprising a total of 5,683 units. While single family detached accounts for the largest portion of residential permits, multi-family accounts for the largest portion of units. Housing units reflect a diverse mix: 54.3% have two or three bedrooms, 28.6% have four or more bedrooms, and smaller units account for the remainder. Most housing stock is relatively modern, with 45.6% built between 2000 and 2019 and an additional 4.57% constructed since 2020. 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Duplex Multi-Family Townhome Single Family Detached Accessory Living Quarters Figure 20: Completed Residential Permits by Type 2019-2023; Source: Planning and Development Services22 Page 251 of 414 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 1,376 1,053 1,304 722 1,228 Figure 21: New Residential Units Constructed by Year; Source: Planning and Development Services Table 6: Completed New Residential Permits* 2019-2023; Source: Planning and Development Services Residential Permit Type 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Duplex 20 30 3 6 17 Multi-Family 21 16 22 3 12 Townhome 45 42 85 57 52 Single Family Detached 367 394 433 548 540 Accessory Living Quarters 2 3 0 0 0 *Note: Completed residential permits are those that have completed the development process, resulting in construction and issuance of certificates of occupancy. Table 7: New Residential Units Constructed 2019-2023; Source: Planning and Development Services Residential Type 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Duplex 40 60 6 12 34 Multi-Family 922 554 780 105 602 Townhome 45 42 85 57 52 Single Family Detached 367 394 433 548 540 Accessory Living Quarters 2 3 0 0 0 23 Page 252 of 414 4 or more bedrooms 2 or 3 bedrooms One bedroom Studios/Eiciencies 3.0% 14.2% 54.3% 28.6% Figure 22: Housing Units by Bedroom Count; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate The occupied housing stock in College Station reflects a dynamic growth pattern over the decades, with the majority of housing units being relatively modern. Table 8 highlights a relatively young and expanding housing landscape in College Station. Table 8: Age of Occupied Housing Stock by Year Built; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate Year Structure Built Housing Units Percent 1939 or earlier 164 0.35% 1940-1959 1,375 2.92% 1960-1979 8,583 18.25% 1980-1999 13,309 28.30% 2000-2019 21,447 45.60% 2020-2023 2,151 4.57% The 2023 estimate of housing stock in College Station reveals significant diversity in housing types, with a substantial presence of multi-family and single-family units. Figure 23: Housing Units by Housing Type; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Boat, RB, Van, etc. Mobile Home Multi-Family Duplex Townhomes Single-Family 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 23,755 2,057 22,391 5,226 102 156 24 Page 253 of 414 Occupancy and Tenure HOUSING OCCUPANCY Figure 24: Housing Occupancy Status Comparisons; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate Figure 25: Occupied Housing Units by Housing Type and Owner-Renter Status; Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2023 1-Year Estimates Occupancy and tenure data provide insights into the local housing market, reflecting patterns of ownership, rental activity, and housing characteristics. College Station has an estimated total of 52,687 housing units, with 89.3% of these units being occupied and 10.7% vacant (ACS 2023). The homeowner vacancy rate is a low 1.7%, indicating strong demand for owner-occupied housing, while the rental vacancy rate is higher at 5.3%, reflecting greater availability in the rental market. These figures suggest a relatively tight housing market, particularly for homeowners. Texas College Station - Bryan MSA College Station Occupied Vacant 90.8%9.2% 88.8%11.2% 89.3%10.7% 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Single-Family Detached Multi-Family Townhomes Duplex Other Owner-occupied housing units Renter-occupied housing units Other 258 0 Duplex 0 2,057 Townhomes 1,084 3,720 Multi-Family 330 18,681 Single FamilyDetached 14,733 6,166 25 Page 254 of 414 RENTALS Renters dominate the housing market, comprising 65.1% of occupied units, consistent with the City’s student population. Registered rental properties account for 32% of single-family and duplex units, with concentrations near Texas A&M University. High turnover rates are evident, with 55.6% of householders moving into their homes since 2021. Figure 26: Rental Registration Density; Source: City of College Station ON-CAMPUS HOUSING Texas A&M University’s on-campus housing consists of 25 residence halls, two university apartments, and the Corp of Cadets dormitory. On campus housing option at Texas A&M’s College Station campus hold a capacity of approximately 11,000 students. In its 2024 Capacity Study, Texas A&M University reported that on-campus housing is at full capacity, and recommends the university increase the number of beds by 2,500 (2024 Capacity Study Report, Texas A&M University). 010.5 Miles RENTAL REGISTRATION DENSITY MIDLOW HIGH DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION THE BARRACKS SPRING LOOP AREA SUMMIT CROSSING HORSE HAVEN STEEPLECHASE WOLF PEN CREEK AREA SOUTHWOOD VALLEY DOVE CROSSING EDELWEISS GARTENS SPRING CREEKTOWNHOMES CREEK MEADOWS COLLEGE HILLS 26 Page 255 of 414 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Employment Between 2018 and 2023, the total number of people employed in the College Station – Bryan MSA increased by 16.2%, a larger percent increase than both the state and neighboring MSAs (Table 9). Texas A&M University continues to be the largest employer in the Brazos Valley. 27 Page 256 of 414 Table 9: Total Nonfarm Employment (2023) and Changes in Employment Levels (2018-2023); Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Region Total Employed 2018 Total Employed 2023 % Change, 2018-2023 United States 148,908,000 156,051,000 4.8% Texas 12,523,300 13,912,700 11.1% College Station - Bryan MSA 119,700 139,100 16.2% Killeen- Temple MSA 143,100 153,500 7.3% Waco MSA 123,400 135,000 9.4% Table 10: Leading Employers – College Station; Source: Greater Brazos Partnership, 2024 Number of Employees Employer 5,000+ Texas A&M University 1,000 - 4,999 City of College Station College Station Independent School District 500 - 999 Baylor Scott and White FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies Reynolds and Reynolds 250 - 499 Cognizant Technology Solutions G-CON Manufacturing 100 - 249 C.C. Creations Kelsey-Seybold Clinic Matica Biotechnology 28 Page 257 of 414 Table 11: MSA Employment by Industry, Bureau of Labor Statistics MSA Employment by Industry % Total Employment in MSA 2018 2023 Government Federal Government 0.7%0.6% State Government 23.3%22.8% Local Government 9.6%8.8% Private Natural Resources and Mining 2.8%2.2% Construction 5.1%4.5% Manufacturing 5.0%4.7% Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 14.1%13.9% Information 0.0%1.1% Financial Activities 3.4%3.4% Professional and Business Services 7.8%9.5% Education and Health Services 10.4%11.7% Leisure and Hospitality 14.3%14.6% Other Services 2.2%2.2% Public Administration 0.0%0.0% Unclassified 0.0%0.1% College Station has a growing, educated labor force and low unemployment rate (Figure 59). The average annual unemployment rate for College Station in 2023 was 3.2%, while the unemployment rate for the State of Texas was 3.9%. Table 12: Average Annual Unemployment Rate Comparisons Average Annual Unemployment Rate Year College Station CS-B MSA Texas 2018 2.9% 3.0% 3.9% 2019 2.8% 2.8% 3.5% 2020 5.0% 5.5% 7.7% 2021 3.8% 4.2% 5.6% 2022 3.1% 3.2% 3.9% 2023 3.2% 3.2% 3.9% 29 Page 258 of 414 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 CS-B MSA Texas Figure 27: College Station-Bryan MSA Unemployment Rate 2018-2024; Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024 While employment in the CS-B MSA grew at a faster rate than both the state and the nation, it had notably lower average annual wages. Median earnings are also lower in the MSA when compared to the median earnings of individuals with similar education levels across the state. Table 13: Average Annual Pay for Nonfarm Employment (2023) and Changes in Average Annual Pay (2018-2023); Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Region Average Annual Pay 2018 Average Annual Pay 2023 % Change 2018-2023 United States $57,266 $72,360 26.4% Texas $57,747 $72,318 25.2% College Station - Bryan MSA $41,882 $52,739 25.9% Killeen- Temple MSA $46,034 $57,659 25.3% Waco MSA $46,096 $57,388 24.5% 30 Page 259 of 414 Graduate or Professional Degree Bachelor Degree Some College or Associate Degree High School Graduate or GED No High School Diploma $66,899 $66,474 $45,447 $37,086 $30,388 $55,613 $41,572 $32,179 $20,819 Texas College Station $83,517 Figure 28: Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months; 2023 ACS 1-Year Estimate, US Census Bureau Between 2018 and 2022, there was a loss of about 5,000 primary jobs in College Station (LEHD, Census Bureau). The largest losses occurred in 2020 and were most likely related to labor market changes brought on by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Since 2018 the percentage of primary jobs in College Station held by workers who live outside the city has increased. The top places where workers live outside of College Station and Bryan are Houston, Austin, and San Antonio. COLLEGE STATION INFLOW/OUTFLOW JOB COUNTS IN 2022 – ALL WORKERS Figure 29: College Station, TX Inflow/Outflow Jobs Counts (Primary Jobs); Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, US Census Bureau Employed in College Station, Lives outside Employed and Lives in College Station Lives in College Station, Employed Outside 36,705 14,924 25,764 31 Page 260 of 414 Table 14: College Station, TX Inflow/Outflow Jobs Counts (Primary Jobs); Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, US Census Bureau Inflow/Outflow Job Count (Primary Jobs) 2018 2022 Employed in College Station 56,610 51,629 Lives Outside 39,605 70.0% 36,705 71.1% Lives Inside 17,005 30.0% 14,924 28.9% Lives in College Station 37,047 40,688 Employed Outside 20,042 54.1% 25,764 63.3% Employed Inside 17,005 45.9% 14,924 36.7% Housing Market The median home sale price in College Station has shown a consistent upward trajectory from 2011 to 2023. In 2011, the median home sale price was approximately $150,000, but by 2023, it had more than doubled, exceeding $300,000. This sharp increase highlights the city’s economic growth, increased housing demand, and rising construction costs over the past decade. $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $0 - $69K$70K - $99K$100K - 149K$150K - $199K$200K - $249K$250K - $299K$300K - $399K$400K - $499K$500K - $749K$750K - $999K$1M+2018 2023 Figure 30: Median Home Sale Price 2011-2023; Source: Texas Real Estate Center Figure 31: College Station Housing Sales Price Distribution 2018 vs 2023; Source: Texas Real Estate Center32 Page 261 of 414 INVENTORY AND SUPPLY DYNAMICS The inventory of active listings and months of inventory fluctuated significantly since the last Existing Conditions report in 2018. In the early years (2018-2019), inventory levels were higher, with months of inventory consistently above 4 months, reflecting a balanced market. However, during the pandemic years (2020-2021), inventory levels dropped dramatically as demand outpaced supply. By December 2021, months of inventory fell to just 0.42, marking a seller’s market. Starting in 2022, inventory levels began to recover as market conditions shifted. By the end of 2023, months of inventory reached 2.47, signaling a move toward more balanced market conditions. Property Tax and Assessed Value Over the last decade, College Station’s total taxable assessed value has almost doubled (Figure 68). Between 2018 and 2023 alone, total taxable assessed value increased by 34%, primarily fueled by rising prices and added value through new construction. Figure 32: Total Taxable Assessed Value 2014-2023; City of College Station 2023 ACFR The total appraised value for all property in the City of College Station is over $17.6 billion (2023 Certified Tax Roll, Brazos County Appraisal District). Residential properties make up $9.1 billion dollars in valuation and commercial properties make up $7.8 billion dollars. The remainder is largely comprised of vacant and agricultural land valued at $844 million. 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $6.23 $6.65 $7.16 $7.95 $8.90 $9.38 $9.92 $10.07 $10.48 $11.96 33 Page 262 of 414 BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITEHOSPITAL & CLINIC MIDTOWN CITY CENTER MIDTOWN CAPROCK CROSSINGAPARTMENTS THE RANCH AT ARRINGTON SUMMIT CROSSING THE BARRACKS MISSION RANCH VIASAT LAKE WALK AT TRADITIONSAPARTMENTS PARK WEST CITYVIEWSOUTHWEST GREENS PRAIRIE RESERVE THE GEORGE HOTEL ASPIRE COLLEGE STATION RISE AT NORTHGATE TEXAS A&M HOTEL & CONFERENCE CENTERTHE HUDSON REV NORTHGATE STUDENT LIVING THE STANDARD THE CALLAWAY HOUSE EMBASSY SUITES CAMBRIDGE CREEK MEADOWS PEBBLE CREEK GARDEN THE CROSSINGAT LICK CREEK Texas A&M Campus property is excluded from map** APPRAISED PROPERTY VALUES PROPERTY VALUE PER ACRE MIDLOW HIGH 375K 1M 1.5M 2M 2.5M 5M 45M020M10M750K DATA SOURCE: BRAZOS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT CERTIFIED 2023 VALUES Figure 33: Appraised Property Values Per Acre; Source: Planning and Development Services Page 263 of 414 Table 15: City Property Tax Rate Over Time; Source: Brazos County Appraisal District Year City Property Tax Rate 2014 0.452500 2015 0.452500 2016 0.472500 2017 0.497500 2018 0.505841 2019 0.534618 2020 0.534618 2021 0.534618 2022 0.524613 2023 0.513086 College Station’s property tax rate is very competitive and among the lowest in the State for cities of its size. The FY2023 property tax rate was set at 51.3086¢ per $100 of assessed value, up 20.5% from FY2014. Over the last ten years, the City’s annual property tax collection grew by 130%. 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $26.2 $29.4 $31.7 $36.8 $42.8 $46.6 $51.4 $52.1 $53.8 $60.3 Figure 34: Property Tax Collections within Fiscal Year of the Levy; Source: City of College Station 2023 ACFR Residential Commercial 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $69.0 $107.6 $100.2 $160.5 $163.5 $215.8 $144.9 $160.8 $268.8 $167.7 Figure 35: New Construction Valuation; Source: Planning & Development Services While single family construction represented the largest portion of new residential construction valuation (69%), the number of single-family permits declined over the last two years. Though multi-family permits only make up 0.44% of all residential permits issued between 2019-2023, it accounted for 21% of new residential construction valuation. New Commercial development between 2019- 2023 was valued at $746,453,119. 35 Page 264 of 414 Table 16: Residential Valuation by Residential Type 2019-2023 Residential Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Duplex $7,967,765 $3,737,724 $1,119,640 $3,102,623 $1,888,360 Townhome $3,321,540 $6,930,368 $33,629,063 $9,218,976 $6,951,686 Single Family Detached $81,003,819 $90,321,188 $132,201,798 $145,697,386 $114,059,008 Multifamily $15,340,000 $59,463,389 $48,863,692 $2,825,000 $44,824,217 Total $107,633,124 $160,452,669 $215,814,193 $160,843,985 $167,723,271 Sales Tax The City receives 1.5% of sales tax on goods and beverages sold within the city limits (Figure 74). Retail and food services make up approximately 71% of the College Station sales tax base, with professional and general services accounting for an additional 21% (Figure 46). Figure 36: Sales Tax by Industry Type; City of College Station 2023-2024 Approved Annual Budget While the nominal amount of sales tax has steadily increased over the last decade, when adjusted for inflation, the amount of sales that received by the city has been relatively flat since 2017. Retail Professional & General Services Accomodation & Food Services Other 19.65% 8.28% 20.47% 51.60% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $24.57 $26.69 $27.16 $28.56 $28.80 $30.73 $30.06 $34.84 $39.17 $40.98 Figure 37: Tax Revenue by Source, Governmental Funds; City of College Station ACFR 2023 36 Page 265 of 414 Tourism College Station boasts many key attractions including the Brazos Valley Veterans Memorial, the Benjamin Knox Gallery, Century Square, Dixie Chicken, Kyle Field, Hullabaloo Diner, and more. Another major attraction in College Station is the George Bush Presidential Library and Museum, which attracts an average of 128,630 visitors annually. The City also works in partnership with attractions in its extraterritorial jurisdiction, like Santa’s Wonderland, that bring tourists into the city. In alignment with national trends, travel and tourism related spending dropped significantly in 2020 due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. In 2021, tourism spending recovered slightly, and by 2023 the City experienced an all-time high in Hotel Occupancy Tax Revenues, Visitor Spending, and Sales Tax Generated by Visitors. In 2023, College Station’s tourism sector generated 5,200 jobs worth 169.4 million dollars in payroll. SOLD AVAILABLE PERCENT OCCUPIED Figure 38: Hotel Indicators; Source: City of College Station 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $5.1M $5.3M $5.3M $5.2M $5.7M $5.8M $3.8M $4.3M $6.5M $7.4M Figure 39: Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund Revenues; City of College Station ACFR 2023 37 Page 266 of 414 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $343.6 $332.7 $330.6 $353.3 $385.2 $390.4 $255.4 $365.8 $428.0 $433.1 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $9.2M $9.3M $9.6M $11.0M $12.3M $12.6M $8.6M $13.2M $15.1M $15.5M Figure 40: Total Direct Travel Spending; Office of the Governor – Economic Development & Tourism Figure 41: Local Tax Receipts Generated by Travel Spending; Office of the Governor – Economic Development & Tourism Page 267 of 414 HOTEL ROOMS >300 200-300 150-200 100-150 50-100 <50 #OF ROOMS 010.5 Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION TEXAS AVE TEXAS AVE S GEORGE BUSH DRUNIVERSITY DRWELLBORN RD WELLBORN RDUNIVERSITYDR EMUNSON AVE HARVEY RDSH 6 S SH 6 SROCK PRAIRIE RDROCK PRAIRIE RDDEACONDRFM 2818SOUTHWEST PKWYHOLLEMANDRPARK PLACEGRAHAM RDEAGLE AVENGMIRE DRLO Figure 42: Hotel Rooms by Number of Rooms; Source: City of College Station The City currently has 40 hotels that have a combined total of 4,354 hotel rooms (Figure 42). Page 268 of 414 LAND USE This section examines the land use patterns and planning strategies in College Station. It covers the City’s growth and annexation history, current and future land use designations, zoning regulations, and the challenges and opportunities facing land use planning in the City. Understanding these elements is crucial for guiding the City’s development and ensuring a balanced, sustainable urban environment. The data on future land use, zoning, and existing land use provides a comprehensive view of how College Station is planning and managing its growth. City Growth and Annexation Annexation is a tool for cities to extend land development regulations – particularly zoning – to manage growth and land use to implement the comprehensive plan. Subsequently, annexation also extends the City’s ETJ boundaries, enabling it to regulate the subdivision of land over a larger area. Since incorporation in 1938, the City of College Station has actively annexed property into its City limits. Between 1938 and 1960, the areas primarily surrounding Texas A&M University were brought into the City limits. By 1980, the City had expanded along Earl Rudder Freeway (State Highway 6) down to Greens Prairie Road, currently referred to as William D. Fitch Parkway. Annexations after 1990 expanded the City limit lines further east along Carter Creek and south and west along Wellborn Road. 40 Page 269 of 414 ANNEXATION 021Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION < 1959 1960-1979 1980-1999 2000-2019 DECADE ANNEXED Figure 44: Annexation by Decade Map; Source: City of College Station 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Figure 43: Growth of College Station’s City Limits (1940-2020); Source: City of College Station 41 Page 270 of 414 NON-ANNEXATION AGREEMENTS 2028 2031 EXPIRATION YEAR DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 0 2.51.25 Miles At the time of incorporation, the City’s ETJ extended one mile beyond the City limits. As a result of annexations and population growth, the City’s ETJ expanded as prescribed by the Texas Local Government Code. Table 17: Extent of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Over Time; Source: City of College Station ETJ Boundary – Miles beyond City Limits Population threshold Year of Expansion 2 25,000 1974 3.5 50,000 1980 5 100,000+ 2018 In 2006, the City began the process of creating an annexation program for properties in the ETJ with an agricultural exemption. The Texas legislature enacted a State law to preserve agricultural land and protect it from municipal annexation. As a part of the law, the City was required to offer development agreements to the property owners of agriculturally appraised land, which protects the land from annexation for 10 years if the property maintains agricultural status and remains undeveloped. As of 2018, the City has entered into development agreements that cover 2,211 acres of agricultural land initially proposed for annexation. Figure 45: Non-Annexation Agreements Map; Source: City of College Station 42 Page 271 of 414 On May 24, 2019, municipal annexation as it existed over the last century was stopped by House Bill 347 (HB347), removing the ability of cities to unilaterally annex new territory. Prior to HB347, annexations were a key tool for cities to manage population growth and ensure financial security for infrastructure and facilities that provide municipal services (Texas Municipal League 2019). This landmark legislation significantly altered the landscape for municipal growth in Texas, requiring most annexations by cities in Texas to receive landowner or voter approval. The City of College Station annexed four acres at the request of the property owner in 2019 under the new annexation regulations. This property was surrounded by the College Station city limits and as so situated, did not expand the city’s extra-territorial jurisdiction. State law allows cities to annex areas without consent if the area is subject to a Strategic Partnership Agreement, which defines the option and timing for future annexation through the agreement. College Station currently has two Strategic Partnership Agreements—one for Brazos County Municipal Utility District No. 1 (Southern Pointe), and one for Brazos County MUD No. 2 (Millican Reserve). The City anticipates additional MUDs will be added to Millican Reserve as development progresses in phases. MUDs also allow cities to control growth through Development Agreements. PLATTED GROWTH Platting involves creating a detailed map of a property showing how it will be divided into lots. The platting process prepares a property for development and subdivision by ensuring it can be properly served by utilities, can access the transportation network, and meets zoning requirements. Growth and platting activity during College Station’s early years reflects the influence of Texas A&M University as the physical, economic, and social center. Over the years, platting activity has steadily expanded outward, particularly to the south. By interlocal agreement, the City does not review plats in the portions of the ETJ within Burleson and Grimes Counties. From 2019 to 2023, the city processed 67 final plats covering 738 acres. Figure 46: Platted Growth Over Time; Source: City of College Station 0 2.51.25 Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLATTED GROWTH HISTORY 1960-1979 < 1959 1980-1999 2000-2019 2020-2024 UNPLATTED 43 Page 272 of 414 FUTURE LAND USE & CHARACTER DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 0 1.50.75 Miles URBAN CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER GENERAL COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL BUSINESS CENTER URBAN RESIDENTIAL MIXED RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL ESTATE RESIDENTIAL RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION MEDICAL INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY PARKS & GREENWAYS NATURAL & OPEN AREAS REDEVELOPMENT AREAS The Future Land Use and Character Map (FLU Map) is the part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan that represents the community’s desired future land use pattern. The future land use categories included within the Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 2, Distinctive Places) serve as policy guides and set expectations for how land within the City of College Station should be developed and used in the future. Those who seek a zoning change either need to comply with the Future Land Use and Character Map or seek a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Figure 47: Future Land Use and Character Map; Source City of College Station Page 273 of 414 Table 18: Acres of Future Land Use by Type; Source: Planning and Development Services Land Use Type Acres Percent Residential 14,835.6 45.54% Natural Areas 5,129.4 15.74% Texas A&M University 4,884.1 14.99% Commercial/Industrial 4,745.8 14.57% Mixed-Use 1,591.5 4.89% Civic 1,145 3.51% Rural 247.9 0.76% Figure 48: Acres of Future Land Use by Type; Source: Planning and Development Services Table 19: Percent of Residential Land Use Types; Source: Planning and Development Services Residential Land Use Type Percent Suburban Residential 47.71% Estate Residential 24.91% Neighborhood Conservation 12.10% Mixed Residential 8.78% Urban Residential 6.50% Table 20: Percentage of Commercial Land Use Types; Source: City of College Station Commercial Land Use Type Percent General Commercial 42.45% Business Center 40.41% Neighborhood Commercial 17.14% While the Future Land Use and Character Map provides a vision for College Station’s development, there are notable differences between planned land use and zoning. Residential Natural Areas Texas A&M University Commercial/Industrial Mixed-Use Civic Rural 14,835.6 5,129.4 4,884.1 4,745.8 1,591.5 1,145.0 247.9 45 Page 274 of 414 Table 21: Comparisons of Future Land Use and Zoning by Category Category Future Land Use Zoning Residential 14,836 11,697 Commercial 4,746 3,680 Mixed-Use 1,592 537 Rural 248 9,705 Comprehensive Plan Amendments The Comprehensive Plan is a living document, subject to amendments as the community’s needs and circumstances change. The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requires that all zoning map amendments (rezoning) follow the Comprehensive Plan. The majority of amendments that are considered are at the request of a property owner as they seek a zoning designation for their property that is not aligned with the Future Land Use and Character Map. Table 22: Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2019-2023 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Grand Total APPROVED 5 2 3 6 3 19 DENIED 1 2 1 0 0 4 TOTAL 6 4 4 6 3 23 PERCENT APPROVED 83%50%75%100%100%83% From 2019 to 2023, a total of 23 Comprehensive Plan amendments were considered by the City Council, with 19 ultimately approved, resulting in an overall approval rate of 83%. The majority of the amendments considered were initiated by private property owners, while 7 of the CPAs were city-initiated amendments, as listed in Table 25. Table 23: City Initiated Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan 2019-2023 City-Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment Status Date Thoroughfare Plan – Thousand Oaks Ranch Approved 02/11/2020 Economic Development Master Plan Approved 03/31/2020 10-Year Comprehensive Plan Update Approved 07/20/2021 Plan Update – Neighborhood Center Amendment Approved 03/07/2022 Sunsetting Small Area Plans Approved 10/04/2022 Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan Approved 07/14/2023 Wellborn District Plan Update Approved 07/14/2023 Zoning Properties in the city limits are subject to zoning, which provides a property’s legal entitlements regarding the types of allowed land uses, dimensional standards, and form. At the time of annexation, land is given the residential/agricultural zoning classification of Rural, with the expectation that a rezoning request will be made for new development that requires a more intense classification. 46 Page 275 of 414 C-3 Light Commercial R-1B Single Family Residential R-4 Multi-Family R-6 High Density Multi-Family R&D Research and Development M-1 Light Industrial M-2 Heavy Industrial OV Corridor Overlay RDD Redevelopment District NPO Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay NCO Neighborhood Conservation Overlay NAP Natural Areas Protected R Rural E Estate RS Restricted Suburban GS General Suburban D Duplex T Townhouse MF Multi-Family MU Mixed-Use MHP Manufactured Homes O O ice WE Wellborn EstateWW WRS Wellborn Restricted SuburbanWW SC Suburban Commercial GC General Commercial CI Commercial Industrial BP Business Park BPI Business Park Industrial C-U College and University P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use Development PDD Planned Development District NG-1 Core Northgate NG-2 Transitional Northgate NG-3 Residential Northgate WPC Wolf Pen Creek WC Wellborn CommercialWW MH Middle Housing ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay HOO High Occupancy Overlay ZONING 0 1.50.75 Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Figure 49: Zoning Map of College Station, Texas; Source: City of College Station Page 276 of 414 Zoning data reveals that residential zones dominate at 32.35%, with GS General Suburban zoning accounting for 60.21% of this category. Multi-family and High-Density Multi-Family zones together represent less than 15%. Commercial and industrial zoning makes up 10.68%, with the majority being GC General Commercial (60.09%). Table 24: Acres of Zoning by Category; Source: Planning and Development Services Zoning Category Acres Percent Residential 10,301 32.35% Rural 9705 30.47% Texas A&M University 5,472 17.18% Commercial/Industrial 3,400 10.68% Planned Development District 2,604 8.18% Design Districts 273 0.86% Natural Areas Protected 87 0.27% Mixed-Use 3.7 0.01% Figure 50: Acres of Zoning by Category; Source: Planning and Development Services Residential Rural Texas A&M University Commercial/Industrial Planned Development District Design Districts Natural Areas Protected Mixed-Use 10,301 9,705 5,472 3,400 2,604 273 87 4 48 Page 277 of 414 Table 25: Acres of Residential Zoning by Type; Source: Planning and Development Services Residential Zoning Type Acres Percent General Suburban 6,203 60.21% Estate 893 8.67% Multi-Family 805 7.82% High Density Multi-Family 754 7.32% Restricted Suburban 724 7.03% Middle Housing 365 3.55% Duplex 187 1.81% Townhouse 175 1.70% Single-Family Residential 116 1.12% Wellborn Restricted Suburban 55 0.53% Manufactured Home Park 25 0.24% Within the broader zoning framework, College Station employs special overlay districts to address specific characteristics and concerns. Two key examples are the neighborhood Restricted Occupancy Overlay (ROO) and High Occupancy Overlay (HOO) districts, which regulate the number of unrelated individuals who can live in a single-family home. The city has 219 acres of High Occupancy Overlay, approximately 11.4% of available acreage (middle housing, mixed use, and multifamily zoning districts). 112.8 acres of Restricted Occupancy Overlay have been established, just 1.8% of all general suburban/ single-family acreage. Table 26: Acres of Commercial and Industrial Zoning by Type; Source: Planning and Development Services Commercial / Industrial Zoning Type Acres Percent General Commercial 2,043 60.09% Light Industrial 804.7 23.67% Office 177.1 5.21% Commercial Industrial 134.7 3.96% Suburban Commercial 74.8 2.20% Light Commercial 66.6 1.96% Heavy Industrial 37.6 1.11% Research & Development 24.9 0.73% Business Park 15.9 0.47% Wellborn Commercial 13.5 0.40% Business Park Industrial 7.4 0.22% 49 Page 278 of 414 Existing Land Use Existing land use shows a substantial portion (40.83%) of the city’s land remains undeveloped or used for agriculture. Currently, residential use makes up 33.23% (11,738.4 acres) of the city’s land, dominated by single-family homes (80.69%). There are smaller percentages of multi-family housing (12.17%) and mixed- use developments (0.15%). Existing commercial and industrial uses currently make up only 4.59% (1,619.9 acres) of land use, with commercial dominating this category. Table 27: Acres of Existing Land Uses by Category; Source: Planning and Development Services Existing Land Use Category Acres Percent Undeveloped & Agricultural 14,422.1 40.83% Residential 11,738.4 33.23% Texas A&M University 5,339.2 15.11% Civic 1,825.8 5.17% Commercial & Industrial 1,619.9 4.59% Other 379.6 1.07% Undeveloped & Agricultural Residential Texas A&M University Civic Commercial & Industrial Other 11,738.4 14,422.1 5,339.2 1,825.8 1,619.9 379.6 Figure 51: Existing Land Uses by Category; Source: Planning and Development Services 50 Page 279 of 414 0 1.50.75 Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION EXISTING LAND USE IN THE CITY LIMITS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (INCLUDING TOWNHOUSE) DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY MIXED-USE GROUP QUARTERS (NURSING HOME, DORM, ETC) MOBILE/MANUFACTURED HOME COMMERCIAL RETAIL (BANKS, HOTELS, ETC) COMMERCIAL OFFICE COMMERCIAL OTHER (AMUSEMENT, SERVICE STATION, ETC) COMMERCIAL - INDUSTRIAL (WAREHOUSING/DISTRIBUTION) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES (COCS, CSISD, LIBRARY, ETC) SEMI-PUBLIC (RELIGIOUS, HOSPITALS, ETC) TAMU (EASTERWOOD) TRANSPORTATION, UTILITIES & COMMUNICATION PARK (PRIVATE & PUBLIC) GREENWAY DRAINAGE COMMON AREA AGRICULTURAL RURAL (LARGE LOT, >= 5 ACRES) UNIMPROVED Figure 52: Existing Land Uses; Source: City of College Station Page 280 of 414 RESIDENTIAL LAND USES DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 021Miles SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (INCLUDING TOWNHOUSES) DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY GROUP QUARTERS (NURSING HOMES, DORMS, ETC.) MOB ILE/MANUFACTURED HOMES EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LAND USES College Station offers a variety of housing types, from single- family homes on different lot sizes to apartments, duplexes, and townhomes. About 32% of land in College Station is used for non- rural residential. In addition to this increase in residential acreage, the City has also seen projects with increased density, particularly in the Northgate Redevelopment Area. Figure 53: Existing Residential Uses by Type; Source: City of College Station Table 28: Acres of Existing Residential Uses by Type; Source: City of College Station Existing Residential Uses by Type Acres Percent Single-Family Residential 9472 80.69% Multi-Family 1428.1 12.17% Duplex Residential 389.1 3.31% Mobile/Manufactured Home 356.6 3.04% Group Quarters 75.4 0.64% Mixed-Use 17.2 0.15% Page 281 of 414 COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL LAND USES COMMERCIAL RETAIL (BANKS, HOTELS, ETC.) COMMERCIAL OFFICE COMMERCIAL OTHER (AMUSEMENT, SERVICE STATION, ETC.) COMMERCIAL - INDUSTRIAL (WAREHOUSING/DISTRIBUTION) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL EXISTING COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL LAND USES DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 021Miles Figure 54: Existing Commercial and Industrial Land Uses; Source: City of College Station Just over half of the land area that has been planned for commercial and industrial uses has been developed for such uses. Approximately 1,920 acres of land within College Station have been commercially or industrially developed, the majority for retail commercial uses. Table 29: Existing Commercial and Industrial Land Uses; Source: City of College Station Existing Commercial/Industrial Uses by Type Acres Percent Commercial Retail 1149 54.51% Commercial Office 390 18.50% Commercial Other 329.8 15.65% Light Industrial 151 7.17% Commercial - Industrial 88 4.17% Page 282 of 414 UNDEVELOPED & AGRICULTURAL LAND USES DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 021Miles AGRICULTURAL RURAL (LARGE LOTS, >= 5 ACRES) UNIMPROVED EXISTING UNDEVELOPED, RURAL & AGRICULTURAL LAND USES Agricultural land accounts for 528.3 acres, representing 3.66% of the total land use in this category. Undeveloped, unplatted land makes up the largest share, totaling 8,557.1 acres or 59.33% of the area. Undeveloped platted land follows with 2,715.6 acres (18.83%). Rural land, defined as large lots of five acres or more, covers 1,627.4 acres, equivalent to 11.28%. Finally, common areas encompass 993.6 acres, representing 6.89%. Figure 55: Existing Undeveloped and Agricultural Land Uses; Source: City of College Station Table 30: Existing Undeveloped and Agricultural Land Uses; Source: City of College Station Existing Undeveloped and Agricultural Uses by Type Acres Percent Undeveloped Unplatted 8557 59.33% Undeveloped Platted 2716 18.83% Rural 1627 11.28% Common Area 994 6.89% Agricultural 528 3.66% Page 283 of 414 Parks constitute the largest portion of civic uses, covering 1,501.6 acres or 45.13% of the total. Public facilities account for 997.1 acres, representing 29.97%, followed by semi-public spaces at 459.2 acres (13.80%). Greenways, which include open and natural spaces, make up the smallest share, totaling 369.3 acres or 11.10%. Table 31: Existing Civic Uses by Type; Source: City of College Station Existing Civic Uses by Type Acres Percent Parks 1502 45.13% Public Facilities 997 29.97% Semi-Public 460 13.80% Greenways 369 11.10% 55 Page 284 of 414 PUBLIC FACILITIES The City plans, maintains and invests in the infrastructure, facilities, services, personnel, and equipment required to meet projected needs and opportunities to accommodate growth. This section includes updated information regarding electric, water, wastewater, sanitation, police, fire, parks, K-12 education, and higher education related to the city’s growth and development patterns. Public Lands and City Facilities The City has 152 municipal buildings and 73 park areas. Park areas cover 2,004.6 acres of land and consist of 50 neighborhood parks, 15 community parks, 6 recreational areas, and 2 cemeteries. College Station Independent School District (CSISD) has 19 school properties and Texas A&M University has 130 properties, including Easterwood Airport. 56 Page 285 of 414 PARKS* CEMETERIES CITY LIMITS K-12 EDUCATION* TAMU PROPERTY* * More detailed maps on the following pages 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 MUNICIPAL COURT11 UTILITY CUSTOMER SERVICE12 POLICE STATION13 PARKS & RECREATION14 CARTER CREEK WWTP15 SOUTHWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER16 UTILITY SERVICE CENTER17 FIRE STATION #318 ARTS CENTER19 FIRE STATION #520 LICK CREEK WWTP21 LARRY J RINGER LIBRARY9 FIRE STATION #210 LINCOLN RECREATION CENTER6 FIRE STATION #17 MEYER SENIOR & COMMUNITY CENTER8 VISITOR CENTER5 FIRE STATION #62 FIRE STATION #43 CITY HALL4 NORTHGATE PARKING GARAGE1 CITY FACILITY BUILDINGS PUBLIC LANDS & CITY FACILITIES SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 021Miles Figure 56: Public Lands & City Facilities Map; Source: City of College Station Page 286 of 414 Electric College Station’s primary electric provider is College Station Utilities (CSU), which is a wholesale power purchaser and does not have generation capabilities. The data on electricity consumption and infrastructure in College Station offers insights into the city’s energy demand and the capacity of its electrical system. Over the years, annual electricity consumption has steadily increased, reflecting growth in population, development, and economic activities. The consumption figures, from 913 million kWh in 2019 to just under 1 billion kWh in 2023, signify a consistent rise in energy needs. The peak in 2022 at 998.4 million kWh suggests that both residential and commercial activities have surged in recent years. Table 32: Annual Electric Consumption; Source: College Station Utilities Year KwH (in Millions) 2019 913 2020 884 2021 919 2022 998 2023 993 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 YearKwH in MillionsFigure 57: Annual Electric Consumption; Source: College Station Utilities Figure 58: Electric Service Indicators College Station’s electrical infrastructure includes 548 miles of electrical lines, supported by 8 substations, serving a total of 44,654 customers—41,038 residential and 3,616 commercial. This indicates a robust distribution network designed to meet both the current and growing energy demands. Figure 84 highlights the utility service areas within College Station, showcasing how the infrastructure is spread across the city. 58 Page 287 of 414 ELECTRIC SERVICE AREAS 021Miles DATA SOURCE: PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS COLLEGE STATION UTILITIES BRYAN TEXAS UTILITIES MIDSOUTH ELECTRIC CO-OP CITY LIMITS ETJ Figure 59: Electric Service Area Map; Source: Public Utility Commission of Texas Page 288 of 414 Water Services WATER College Station pumps water from deep wells located on city-owned land over the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer, in the Carrizo, Sparta, and Simsboro Sand formations. College Station disinfects its drinking water with gas chlorine to provide an effective chlorine residual. After the water is disinfected, it is pumped into the water distribution system, which includes elevated storage tanks. The elevated storage tanks provide an adequate supply of water pressure for homes, businesses, and fire protection within the College Station water certificated area (CCN). College Station’s water system includes over 490 miles of water distribution lines, 10 groundwater wells, 2 pump stations, 2 ground water storage tanks, and 3 elevated storage tanks. The water system is rated “Superior” by the State of Texas and has received awards for outstanding operations and maintenance from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The city has approximately 117,571 residential water consumers and sees an average consumption of 130 GPCD per person per day. Notably, the City saw annual water consumption exceed 5,000 million gallons of water starting in 2022. Due to the recent increase in water consumption, the average annual water consumption between 2019 and 2023 was 5,004.92 million gallons. Currently the City has approved well permits for the construction of three new groundwater wells. Water consumption also reflects a growth pattern, with usage steadily increasing from around 4,000 million gallons (MG) in 2014 to over 5,900 MG in 2022. Figure 60: Water Consumption by Year; Source: College Station Water Services 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 YearMG 60 Page 289 of 414 0 2.51.25 Miles WATER SERVICE AREAS DATA SOURCE: PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS PARK PLACE ROCK PRAIRIE GREENS PRAIRIE COLLEGE STATION UTILITIES WATER TOWER CITY OF BRYAN WELLBORN SUD CITY LIMITS ETJ WICKSON CREEK SUD Figure 61: Water Service Areas; Source: Public Utility Commission of Texas Page 290 of 414 Wastewater The City’s wastewater collection system consists of a network of 397 miles of collector mains, interceptors and force mains, 17 lift stations, and three wastewater treatment facilities. The Carters Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) has a current permitted capacity of 9.5 MGD average daily flow. The Lick Creek WWTP has a current permitted capacity of 5 MGD average daily flow. All water leaving College Station’s wastewater treatment facilities must meet regulatory limits set by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the permits for each wastewater treatment facility. Wastewater in College Station is treated using screening and grit removal (to remove grease, grit and large objects), aeration, clarification, biosolids digestion and dewatering, and disinfection. Figure 62: Wastewater Service Areas; Source: Public Utility Commission of Texas WASTEWATER SERVICE AREAS 021Miles DATA SOURCE: PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS COLLEGE STATION UTILITIES CITY OF BRYAN CITY LIMITS ETJ WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CARTER CREEK CARTER LAKE LICK CREEK Page 291 of 414 Solid Waste The Cities of Bryan and College Station joined together in 1990 to create the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency. BVSWMA operates from the Twin Oaks Landfill, a Subtitle D landfill situated on 610-acres off of Highway 30 in Grimes County. Recycling is currently contracted to BVR Waste and Recycling for single-family residences. Each residential customer receives weekly services for garbage, bulk trash and brush, and recycling. Figure 63: Twin Oaks Landfill; Source: Brazos Central Appraisal District BVSWMA PROPERTY CITY LIMITS TWIN OAKS LANDFILL DATA SOURCE: BRAZOS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 021Miles TWIN OAKS SH 30 S H 6FM 60FM 2 1 5 4 SH 40S H 6 Page 292 of 414 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 5,723 24,415 5,527 28,435 6,044 30,746 5,516 28,218 5,467 29,343 Residential Recycling (Tons) Garbage Collected (Tons) Garbage Collected (Tons) Residential Recycling (Tons) Figure 64: Residential Tons of Garbage and Recycling Collected by Year; Source: City of College Station 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 5,000 0 16,912 42,423 18,977 36,434 19,035 42,975 20,083 44,354 18,662 44,196 Commercial Recycling (Tons)Commercial Garbage (Tons) Commercial Garbage (Tons) Commercial Recycling (Tons) Figure 65: Commercial Tons of Garbage and Recycling Collected by Year; Source: City of College Station The total tons of garbage collected annually have seen fluctuations. Residential garbage increased notably from 2019 to 2021, peaking at 30,745.8 tons in 2021 before declining slightly in 2022 and 2023. Commercial garbage also fluctuated, with a significant dip in 2020 (36,433.7 tons) likely due to reduced commercial activity during the pandemic. Collection volumes rebounded in 2021 and remained stable in 2022 and 2023. Residential recycling peaked in 2021 at 6,044 tons but declined slightly in the subsequent years. Commercial recycling increased steadily from 2019 to 2022, reaching 20,083.1 tons, but saw a decline in 2023 to 18,662 tons. 64 Page 293 of 414 CITY PARKS & PUBLIC ART 0 1.50.75 Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION SCULPTURES DIANA'S QUEST4 SERVICE WITH HONOR16 ETERNAL WINDS5 SKY CUTTER17 FFA DONOR WALL6 SPIRIT GATE18 FREE FLIGHT7 STAKING THE CLAIM19 GENESIS8 TIGER PRIDE20 HALFTIME9 VETERAN'S MEMORIAL21 AGGIE SPIRIT1 OUR LADY OF VICTORY13 CAMBRIA2 PETUNIA14 CHILDREN OF PEACE3 SERVICE WITH COURAGE15 HOLD ON10 22 WAR ON TERRORL I "HEART" AGGIELANDT11 23 WILDERNESS AWAKENED LYNN STUART PATHWAYSCULPTURES12 24 XIGGEROTTS DEVELOPED PARKS ETONBURY21 30 LIONS 31 LONGMIRE 27 JOHN CROMPTON 28 LEMONTREE 29 LICK CREEK 26 JACK & DOROTHY MILLER 23 GABBARD 24 GEORGIE K FITCH 25 GREENS PRAIRIE RESERVE 22 FIRST DOWN 32 LUTHER JONES 33 MERRY OAKS 34 MIDTOWN RESERVE 35 NORTHGATE 36 OAKS ANDERSON1 37 PARKWAY ART & MYRA BRIGHT2 38 PEBBLE CREEK BARRACKS II3 39 PHILLIPS BEE CREEK4 40 REATTA MEADOWS BILLIE MADELEY5 41 RICHARD CARTER BRIAN BACHMANN6 42 SANDSTONE BRIDGEWOOD7 43 SOUTHERN OAKS BRISON8 44 SOUTHWEST BROTHERS POND9 45 STEEPLECHASE CARTER'S CROSSING10 46 STEPHEN C BEACHY CENTRAL CASTLE ROCK11 47 THOMAS CASTLEGATE12 48 UNIVERSITY COVE OF NANTUCKET13 49 VETERANS PARK & ATHLETIC COMPLEX CREEK VIEW14 50 W A TARROW CRESCENT POINTE15 51 WALLACE LAKE CY MILLER16 52 WILDWOOD EASTGATE17 53 WINDWOOD EDELWEISS18 54 WOLF PEN CREEK EDELWEISS GARTENS19 55 WOODCREEK EMERALD FOREST20 56 WOODLAND HILLS 22 23 24 25 26 16 17 18 19 20 21 9 10 6 7 8 5 2 3 4 1 11 12 13 14 15 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 9 10 6 7 8 5 2 3 4 1 11 12 13 14 15 DEVELOPED PARKS UNDEVELOPED PARKS SCULPTURES# Figure 66: Parks and Monuments; Source: City of College Station Parks and Recreation Page 294 of 414 The City of College Station provides parks and recreational opportunities through its Parks and Recreation Department, whose mission is “to provide a diversity of facilities and leisure services that are geographically and demographically accessible.” The department is responsible for the design, construction, and operation of park facilities, along with the development and implementation of recreation programs. College Station has extensive parkland and recreational amenities, with a total of 1,895.35 acres of parkland spread across 58 parks and supported by 70 buildings and facilities. The city boasts a well-distributed network of neighborhood parks (50), community parks (15), recreational areas (6), and cemeteries (2), catering to diverse community needs. Key features include various specialized facilities, such as three disc golf courses located in Oaks, Wolf Pen Creek, and Southern Oaks Parks, offering both recreational and social engagement opportunities. Wolf Pen Creek, the largest of these parks, spans 63.71 acres, while Southern Oaks and Oaks Parks are smaller but provide accessible 9-hole courses. The City also supports active recreation with facilities such as pickleball courts in Brian Bachmann and Bee Creek Parks. Brian Bachmann Park, covering 42.32 acres, stands out with its wide array of amenities, including a community pool, multiple sports fields, and a pavilion, making it a hub for community activity. Similarly, Bee Creek Park’s 44.60 acres house softball fields, playgrounds, and trails, emphasizing multi- functional recreational spaces. Paved trails are a staple in most parks, while unpaved trails in Lick Creek, Bee Creek, and Billie Madeley Parks offer opportunities for nature exploration. Page 295 of 414 Law Enforcement and Emergency Services POLICE The College Station Police Department (CSPD) is primarily responsible for the protection of life, liberty, and property for people that are within the City limits. It provides these services through various means including enforcement of criminal laws and ordinances, providing education, recovery of property, animal control, traffic enforcement, and investigation of crimes. CSPD is made up of three bureaus: the Administrative Services Bureau, Field Operations Bureau, and Operational Support Bureau. The Administrative Services Bureau includes many different divisions within the department that supplement and enhance the overall operations of the department. These include divisions for Information Services, Communications, Support Services, and Technical Services. The Field Operations Bureau is the largest bureau in CSPD and encompasses uniformed patrol, police assistants, traffic enforcement unit, and the College Station Tourism and Entertainment Policing. The Uniformed Patrol Division is the largest division in CSPD and includes 91 Officers, 13 Sergeants, 3 Lieutenants, 2 K9s, and a Drone Team. The Operational Support Bureau includes the Criminal Investigations Division, the Recruiting and Training Division, and the Special Operations Division. The College Station Police Department (CSPD) has been accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) since 1991. The CSPD has an Advanced certification and a Meritorious designation. CALEA accreditation recognizes agencies that demonstrate professionalism, integrity, and other qualities. The CSPD’s Communication Division was the first accredited program of its kind in Texas in 2003. The CSPD recently received reaccreditation awards for law enforcement and public safety communications. 67 Page 296 of 414 POLICE TERRITORY ASSIGNMENTS 021Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 12 7 10 8 9 11 1 4 2 3 5 6 0 POLICE BEATS POLICE STATION POLICE FACILITIES Figure 67: Police Beats Map; Source: City of College Station Page 297 of 414 CSPD officers are assigned to sectors and beats. The structure divides the City into three sectors. The sectors are further divided into beats with a total of twelve beats. Two Community Enhancement Unit (CEU) Officers are assigned to each sector. The CEU Officers have primary responsibility for the quality of life and crime issues affecting their assigned sectors. Patrol Officers are assigned to beats or sectors for the duration of each shift, with officers regularly being assigned to the same areas for familiarity. Table 33: Major Offenses 2019-2023 Offense Count Murder 3 Robbery 8 Burglaries 643 Vehicle Burglaries 449 Sexual Assault 84 Theft of a Firearm 105 Aggressive Assault 97 Alcohol-related Non-reportable Fatality Minor Major 96 170 4 972 599 Non-Traic Warnings Traic Warnings Non-Traic Citations Traic Citations 1,559 16,533 4,226 10,942 Figure 68: Traffic Accidents 2023; Source: City of College Station Figure 69: Citations and Warnings 2023; Source: City of College Station ARRESTS AND CITATIONS TRAFFIC AND ACCIDENTS 69 Page 298 of 414 Fire The College Station Fire Department (CSFD) provides prevention, suppression, advanced life support, emergency medical services and transport, community risk reduction programs, and special operations along with Advanced Life Support to the southern half of Brazos County and fire suppression to the Texas A&M campus. CSFD employed 166 professional staff. CSFD has one building facility (dispatch and administration) and six fire stations. CSFD staffs 5 fire engines, 2 platform ladder trucks, 1 quint, 4 ambulances, 1 water tender, 1 airport truck, 1 safety officer, and 3 battalion chiefs. Additionally, the department operates special teams that includes hazardous materials, wildland, swift water, bicycle response, medical task force, and search and rescue. A seventh fire station is currently in the development process. CSFD is an accredited agency by the Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI). CFAI determines accreditation by ensuring CSFD meets or exceeds the highest standards of performance and safety and requires reaccreditation every five years. Additionally, CSFD holds an Insurance Service Office (ISO) Class 1/8Y Public Protection Classification (PPC) rating. Effective April 1, 2019, an ISO Class 1 Rating places CSFD in the top-tier of agencies in the United States that provide fire protection. The enhanced rating validates that fire protection, water service, and communications are in the top-tier. The PPC score is a measure of the community’s overall ability to reduce property losses due to fires. The scale of a PPC rating ranges from 1-10, with Class 1 being the highest rating. Finally, College Station has a premier collection of emergency response training facilities in its backyard: Brayton Fire Training Field, Disaster City®, and the Emergency Operations Training Center — all operated by the Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service (TEEX). Emergency Medical Services (EMS) of the CSFD ensures that all department vehicles, including ambulances, fire engines, and ladder trucks have the capability to perform advanced-level medical care up to the Mobile Intensive Care Unit (MICU) level. The capabilities of these units include defibrillation, cardioversion, pacing, ECG and EKG interpretation, IV therapy, IO Access, medication administration, advanced airway management and intubation, chest decompression, and other advanced skills. CSFD EMS provides Medical Standy for community events. Since the City’s last fire station opened in 2012, the population has grown by 34%, and the call volume for emergency fire/EMS services has increased by 83%. The proposed $18M fire station #7 will be strategically located to improve response times in the City’s southern portion. 70 Page 299 of 414 FIRE DISTRICTS & STATIONS 021Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 FIRE DISTRICTS 1 6 4 A 2 3 5 7* FIRE FACILITIES FUTURE FIRE STATION* EXISTING FIRE STATION# FIRE ADMINA Figure 70: Fire Districts and Stations; Source: City of College Station Page 300 of 414 FIRE DEPARTMENT AND EMS ACTIVITY The fire department’s activities highlight a diverse set of responsibilities. In 2023, fire calls numbered 251, while public assistance/service calls (1,098) and false alarms (1,171) formed a substantial share of their workload, showcasing their broader community role. Specialized incidents like hazardous materials cases (355) and technical rescues (71) point to the complexity of modern fire service operations. The EMS breakdown shows 7,072 total calls attended to 8,561 patients, with significant emphasis on advanced life support (6,065 cases) and transports (5,576 cases). Figure 71: 2023 Fire Department Calls by Type; Source: City of College Station Public K-12 Education College Station Independent School District (CSISD) has been a consolidated district since 1941, when the public school was moved from the Texas A&M University campus to facilities on Timber Street. The district encompasses approximately 102 square miles in the southern portion of Brazos County, and it is fully accredited by the Texas Education Agency. CSISD operates three high schools, three middle schools, three intermediate schools, and ten elementary schools across College Station. The school district has also constructed a 44-acre transportation facility off William D. Fitch Parkway. Other False Alarm Good Intent Motor Vehicle Accidents Public Assist/Service Fire Hazardous Materials Technical Rescues Explosions/Overheats Aircraft Rescues/Standbys Animal Rescues 4 1,171 1,091 743 1,098 251 355 71 19 17 4 72 Page 301 of 414 021Miles SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION K-12 EDUCATION 1 COLLEGE HILLS 2 CREEK VIEW 3 FOREST RIDGE 4 GREENS PRAIRIE 5 PEBBLE CREEK 6 RIVER BEND 7 ROCK PRAIRIE 8 SOUTH KNOLL 9 SOUTHWOOD VALLEY 10 SPRING CREEK 11 CYPRESS GROVE 12 OAKWOOD 13 PECAN TRAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS HIGH SCHOOLS 14 A&M CONSOLIDATED 15 COLLEGE STATION 16 WELLBORN A&M CONSOLIDATED17 COLLEGE STATION18 COLLEGE VIEW19 20 INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIPOF TEXAS HIGH SCHOOL INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIPOF TEXAS K-8 SCHOOL CHARTER SCHOOLS 21 1 2 3 4 56 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Figure 72: CSISD Facilities; Source: City of College Station Page 302 of 414 The data for the CSISD highlights growth in educational outcomes and resource allocation. For the 2023- 2024 school year, the district served 14,430 students across its elementary, intermediate, middle, and high schools, with high schools seeing the largest enrollment at 4,423 students. 31% of enrolled students were in high school, 15% in middle school, 14% in intermediate, and 40% in elementary. Graduation rates have consistently increased over the years, climbing from 91.9% in 2014 to 95.1% in 2022. College Station’s first public charter school, International Leadership of Texas, has been open since the 2018-2019 school year. Two other school districts serve a small proportion of students in College Station and its extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Generally, Bryan ISD serves College Station residents east of Carter Creek and on the west side of Easterwood Airport. Navasota ISD serves the southernmost portion of College Station’s ETJ, just south of Peach Creek. Figure 73: 2023-2024 K-12 Enrollment; Source: College Station Independent School District Figure 74: CSISD Graduate Rate 2014-2022; Source: College Station Independent School District High School Middle School Intermediate School Elementary School 4,423 2,169 2,016 5,822 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 74 Page 303 of 414 TRANSPORTATION The average travel time to work in College Station is 18.8 minutes (ACS 2023), which is less than the average travel time to work in Texas (27.2 minutes). Most residents’ means of transportation to work is to drive alone (74.8%), while 6.3% carpool, 3.5% use public transit, 4% walk, 2.3% travel by bicycle, and 8% work remotely. The availability of vehicles among residents also highlights the area’s demographic characteristics. About 5.5% of occupied housing units have no vehicles available, while 37.2% of units have one vehicle, and 38.1% have two vehicles. Thoroughfares College Station’s economic vitality, character, and identity rely on a well-connected transportation system. The City’s thoroughfare network applies context-sensitive design principles to address multi-modal transportation needs while aligning with land use and character objectives. The Thoroughfare Plan, part of the Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 6: Mobility), outlines a long-term vision for the major street network required to support future mobility demands. It serves as a guide for future transportation investments and classifies roadways based on their function, including access to adjacent land uses, mobility for through traffic, and surrounding context. The plan identifies the locations of planned and existing roadways classified as minor collectors or higher within College Station and its ETJ (extraterritorial jurisdiction). 75 Page 304 of 414 THOROUGHFARE PLAN 0 2.51.25 Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY PROPOSED FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY 6 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL PROPOSED 6 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL 4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL PROPOSED 4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL MINOR ARTERIAL PROPOSED MINOR ARTERIAL MAJOR COLLECTOR PROPOSED MAJOR COLLECTOR MINOR COLLECTOR PROPOSED MINOR COLLECTOR CITY LIMITS ETJ PROPOSED GRADE SEPARATED CROSSING GRADE SEPARATED CROSSING UNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM 60F M 2 1 5 4 PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYSH 30 HOLLEMAN DR SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD S H 6 S H 6 RD ROCK FM 2 1 5 4 TE X A S A V E S FM 2818F M 2 8 1 8 Figure 75: Thoroughfare Plan Map; Source: City of College Station Page 305 of 414 Figure 76: Thoroughfare Expansions and Improvements Map; Source: City of College Station FUTURE THOROUGHFARES & EXPANSIONS 0 2.51.25 Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FUTURE EXPANSIONS FUTURE THOROUGHFARES CITY LIMITS ETJ FUTURE GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS UNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM 60FM 2 1 5 4 PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYSH 30 HOLLEMAN DR SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD SH 6 S H 6 RD ROCK FM 2 1 5 4 TE X A S A V E S FM 2818 F M 2 8 1 8 EALGE AVEGRAHAM RDGRAHAM RDDEACONDRUNIVERSITY DR EHOLLEMAN DRSOUTH WE S TPKWYPage 306 of 414 The Future Thoroughfare and Expansions Map outlines future thoroughfare plans and expansions within the City of College Station. Future road expansions aim to improve connectivity, particularly in areas currently underserved by major roads. Proposed grade separated crossings are strategically placed to reduce congestion and improve safety at major intersections or railroad crossings. The planned infrastructure also aims to accommodate growth outside the existing municipal boundaries. The Plan highlights a concentration of thoroughfare development along major routes such as Rock Prairie Road and FM 2154. The future thoroughfares are designed to enhance regional connectivity, linking College Station with neighboring areas, particularly along SH 30 and other routes heading outward. PARKING Off-street parking requirements are detailed in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) under Article 5 (“District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards,”) and Article 7 (“General Development Standards,”). On August 10, 2023, the City of College Station adopted Ordinance #2023-4454, which updated the off-street parking requirements as follows: 1. established off-street parking maximums for commercial parking; 2. reduced the minimum off-street parking required for commercial parking in half; and 3. removed minimum requirement for off-street parking for commercial developments that are in Redevelopment areas. On-street parking is generally permitted in both residential and non-residential areas if streets meet specific standards to ensure emergency access (UDO Section 8.3.V). Specifically, streets wider than 27 feet allow parking on both sides, streets 24 to 27 feet wide permit parking on one side, and streets narrower than 24 feet have parking removed on both sides. In the Northgate District, 104 marked ParkMobile spaces are available on Nagle, Stasney, Tauber, Lodge, and Cross streets. TRAFFIC The Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) is a critical metric to understand traffic flow dynamics. The data analyzed are from 2023. Stations on Highway 6 show consistent increases in AADT over the years. These stations report recent values exceeding 70,000 vehicles per day, highlighting the corridor’s significance as a major arterial route. Some routes, such as Harvey Mitchell Parkway, show significant year-to-year variation, reflecting potential external influences such as the academic calendar of Texas A&M University. Some roads, particularly minor or regional routes, show declining traffic or stagnation. 78 Page 307 of 414 2023 ESTIMATED DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 021MilesFM 60FM 2 8 1 8 FM 2154SH 40SH 6 S H 6 HARVEY RDUNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM 215 4 FM 281 8TE XAS AV E S ROCK PRAIRIE RD GREENS PRAIRIE RDBARRON RDEAGLE AVEGRAHAM RDDEACON DRSOUTHWEST PKWYHOLLEMAN DR SF M 2 1 5 4 UNIVERSITY DRE0-5,000 5,001-15,000 15,001-25,000 25,001-40,000 40,001-65,000 65,001 + NUMBER OF VEHICLES PER DAY Figure 77: Estimated Daily Traffic Volume Map; Source: Texas Department of Transportation Page 308 of 414 HIGHWAYS Traffic stations on Highway 6 consistently report the highest AADT values, with volumes exceeding 60,000 to 70,000 vehicles daily. This reflects its importance as a major thoroughfare for long-distance and regional travel. Traffic fluctuations between years may indicate periodic maintenance or alternate routing during construction. MAJOR ROADS Traffic along Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818) varies. AADT values range from 20,000 to 40,000 depending on the segment. Major arterial roadways like Texas Avenue, University Drive, and Harvey Mitchell Parkway highlight higher traffic volumes in proximity to city centers and intersections. Moderate but steady traffic is reported along University Drive (FM 60), with stations reporting AADT around 30,000. COLLECTOR ROADS Traffic levels are significantly lower on collector roads. These roads typically range from 1,000 to 10,000 AADT depending on the segment. Examples include Longmire (3,936 AADT) and Lincoln (5,255 AADT). GEOSPATIAL TRAFFIC PATTERNS Traffic patterns can be spatially analyzed, and three primary themes emerge: urban core traffic, periphery roads traffic, and directional variations in traffic (Figure 82). Stations near the city’s core report the highest AADT values. This aligns with the density of development and associated economic activities. As distance from the City increases, traffic volumes decrease. Finally, northbound and southbound lanes sometimes show differing AADT, indicating directional traffic surges likely driven by commuting patterns. 80 Page 309 of 414 Crashes Analyzing crash patterns can help us identify crash locations, severity, road types, and intersections with the highest crash occurrences. CRASH LOCATIONS The distribution of crashes by location from 2019 to 2023 reveals several trends (Figure 78). Non- Intersection Areas account for the highest number of crashes, nearing 10,000 incidents in the five-year period. Intersections follow as the second most common crash location, highlighting the need for enhanced traffic management at these points. Intersection-Related Crashes (occurring near intersections) also contribute significantly, suggesting challenges in areas transitioning into or out of intersections. Driveway Access Points have the fewest crashes, but they still represent a noteworthy safety concern for vehicles entering or exiting properties. Figure 78: Crashes by Intersection Code, 2019-2023; Source: City of College Station CRASH SEVERITY The most common category for crash severity is the “Not Injured” category, with over 11,000 cases between 2019 and 2023. In this time frame, 96% crashes in the City are categorized as minor crashes, including crashes that had suspected minor injuries, possible injuries, or no injuries. Suspected Minor Injuries are the second most common outcome, followed by Possible Injuries. Fatalities and Serious Injuries are relatively rare. 2.86% of crashes in College Station were categorized as major crashes. Major crashes include those that have fatalities or suspected serious injuries. NON INTERSECTION INTERSECTION RELATED INTERSECTION DRIVEWAY ACCESS 9,483 4,997 6,706 2,109 NOT INJURED FATAL INJURY POSSIBLE INJURY SUSPECTED MINOR INJURY SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY UNKNOWN 250 547 5,250 3,608 54 11,293 Figure 79: Crashes by Severity; Source: Texas Department of Transportation 81 Page 310 of 414 CRASH DATA CRASH DENSITY MIDLOW HIGH DATA SOURCE: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0 1.50.75 Miles 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 TEXAS AVE & POPLAR ST 2 WELLBORN RD & GEORGE BUSH DR 3 HOLLEMAN DR S & HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY S 4 SH 6 S & UNIVERSITY DR E 5 TEXAS AVE S & HOLLEMAN DR E 6 TEXAS AVE & LINCOLN AVE 7 TEXAS AVE S & HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY S 8 TEXAS AVE S & SOUTHWEST PKWY E 9 SH 6 S & HARVEY RD 10 SH 6 S & ROCK PRAIRIE RD TOP 10 INTERSECTIONS WITH CRASHES TOP 10 INTERSECTIONS The intersections with the highest crash frequencies include Texas Avenue and Poplar Street, Wellborn Road and George Bush Road, and Holleman Dr South and Harvey Mitchell Parkway South. Texas Avenue S and Poplar Street ranks as the most crash-prone intersection, which is heavily influenced by the number of crashes at intersections directly North and South of the intersection (e.g., Texas and University and Texas and Live Oak intersections, respectively). In response to the high number of crashes at that intersection, the median opening at Texas Avenue and Live Oak Street was closed in 2024 and crashes have since decreased in this area and are expected to continue this decline in crashes in the future. Wellborn Road and George Bush Road and other intersections along major thoroughfares like Texas Avenue and Earl Rudder Freeway feature prominently in the top 10. Figure 80: Intersection Crash Hotspots Map Table 34: Top Ten Intersection Crash Hotspots; Source: Texas Department of Transportation Rank Intersection 1 Texas Ave / Poplar St 2 Wellborn Rd / George Bush Rd 3 Holleman Dr S / Harvey Mitchell Pw S 4 Earl Rudder Fwy S / University Dr E 5 Texas Ave / Holleman Dr E 6 Texas Ave / Lincoln Ave 7 Texas Ave / Harvey Mitchell Pw S 8 Texas Ave / Southwest Pw E 9 Earl Rudder Fwy S / Harvey Rd 10 Earl Rudder Fwy S / Rock Prairie Rd Page 311 of 414 Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility The City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Program aims to improve connectivity and accessibility, enhance safety, promote outdoor activity, and encourage environmental stewardship. Currently, the city maintains 57.7 miles of bike lanes, 21.2 miles of bike routes, 387.7 miles of sidewalks, and 40.6 miles of multiuse paths. BICYCLE PLAN The City contains a network of existing bicycle lanes concentrated in urbanized areas and major corridors. This indicates current efforts to facilitate bicycle commuting within the city core. Existing shared-use paths complement bicycle lanes, offering additional off-road options for cyclists and connecting recreational spaces or less urbanized areas. 83 Page 312 of 414 BICYCLE PLAN 021Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PROPOSED GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS FUNDED GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS EXISTING GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS EXISTING BICYCLE LANES FUNDED BICYCLE FACILITIES* PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES* EXISTING BICYCLE ROUTES PROPOSED BICYCLE ROUTES EXISTING SHARED USE PATHS FUNDED SHARED USE PATHS PROPOSED SHARED USE PATHS CITY LIMITS ETJ *Bicycle facilities could be bicycle lanes, buered bicycle lanes, or separated bicycle lanes. Figure 81: Bicycle Plan Map; Source: Planning and Development Services Page 313 of 414 The large network of proposed bicycle facilities (dashed red) and proposed bicycle routes indicates significant future investment to fill gaps in the current infrastructure. The proposed infrastructure focuses on extending connectivity into peripheral areas, including the ETJ. Table 35: Bike Plan Category by Total Miles; Source: City of College Station Bike Category Miles Bike Facility Proposed 87.42 Bike Lane Existing 56.55 Bike Lane Funded 4.54 Bike Route Existing 21.17 Bike Route Proposed 70.41 Multi-use Path Existing 41.21 Multi-use Path Funded 14.65 Multi-use Path Proposed 82.85 The combination of shared-use paths and dedicated bicycle facilities reflects a multi-modal approach, supporting both pedestrian and bicycle traffic. In 2020, the City was designated a bronze level “Bicycle Friendly Community” by the League of American Bicyclists. In 2024, the City received the recognition again, as well as the silver level “Bicycle Friendly Business” designation for the new City Hall constructed in 2021. 85 Page 314 of 414 Figure 82: Pedestrian Plan Map; Source: City of College Station PROPOSED GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS FUNDED GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS EXISTING GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS EXISTING SIDEWALKS FUNDED SIDEWALKS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS EXISTING SHARED USE PATHS FUNDED SHARED USE PATHS PROPOSED SHARED USE PATHS CITY LIMITS ETJ PEDESTRIAN PLAN 021Miles DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PEDESTRIAN PLAN A robust network of existing sidewalks is already in place, particularly in the city center and key corridors. Existing shared-use paths are primarily located along major routes or connecting recreational and urban spaces, supporting both pedestrians and cyclists. A smaller number of existing grade-separated crossings indicate limited infrastructure for safe pedestrian crossings over high-traffic or natural barriers. Proposed grade-separated crossings at critical points signal efforts to improve pedestrian safety where traffic or topographic barriers exist. Table 36: Pedestrian Plan Category by Total Miles; Source: City of College Station Pedestrian Category Miles Multi-use Path Existing 40.75 Multi-use Path Funded 11.63 Multi-use Path Proposed 82.72 Sidewalk Existing 388.14 Sidewalk Funded 4.02 Sidewalk Proposed 86.59 Page 315 of 414 Bus Transit BRAZOS TRANSIT DISTRICT The Brazos Transit District (BTD) is a public transportation provider providing services to the seven counties of the Brazos Valley. The BTD operates Fixed Routes, ADA Paratransit Service, and Demand and Response transit options. BTD operates nine routes within the City of College Station (Brazos Transit District, 2024). The ridership fluctuated in FY 2021, with total ridership at 1.5 million trips. Ridership increased substantially in FY 2023, increasing to 5.88 million trips. There were notable declines in winter months and early summer, with peaks in the late summer, likely due to seasonal variations such as student activity and the university. 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 20 Sep20 Oct20 Nov20 Dec20 Jan20 Feb20 Mar20 Apr20 May20 Jun20 Jul20 AugRidership Fiscal Year 2021 Ridership Fiscal Year 2023 Figure 83: Brazos Transit District Ridership FY21 vs FY23; Source: Texas Department of Transportation 87 Page 316 of 414 Texas A&M Transportation Texas A&M University’s transit program, AggieSpirit Transit, operates a fleet of 92 full-size buses and 4 smaller buses. Of these, 70 buses are used for daily routes, while the remainder are designated for charters. The buses accommodate approximately 35–40 passengers each, depending on the design and layout. The transit system supports an estimated annual ridership of over 6.4 million. Daily ridership averages 18,000 on-campus passengers and 30,000 off-campus passengers across seven on-campus and twelve off-campus routes. Figure 84: Brazos Transit and Aggie Spirit Bus Routes; Source: City of College Station BUS ROUTES COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS BRYAN CITY LIMITS BRAZOS TRANSIT DISTRICT TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY DATA SOURCE: BRAZOS TRANSIT DISTRICT & TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 01.50.75 Miles E WJB PKWY FM 2 8 1 8 FM 60 FM 2 1 5 4 WILLIAM D FITCH PKWYHOLLEMAN DR SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD SH 6 SH 6 GRAHAM RDTE X A S A V E SFM 2 8 1 8 S H 6 ROCK PRAI DEACONDR S C O L L E G E A V E S T E X A S A V E N T E X A S A V E FE A T H E R R D FI N FM 2 8 1 8 E SH 21W SH 21 SH 4 7 ERSITY DR EW VILLA MARIBRIARCREST DRW 28TH ST UNIVEAGLE AVERIERD MI D T OWN D R FM 2818HARVEY RDARDS H 6 88 Page 317 of 414 Railroad Union Pacific operates the rail line paralleling Wellborn Road. College Station has seven at-grade railroad crossings and two grade-separated crossings. Plans include the addition of three more grade-separated crossings, replacing two existing at-grade crossings. Figure 85: Railroad Crossings Map; Source: City of College Station RAILROAD CROSSINGS 010.5 MilesF&B RDFM 60GEORGE BUSH DRUNIVERSITY DRFM 281 8 FM 2818ROYDER RD SH 6 HOLLEMAN DRSOUTHWESTPKWYTEXAS A V E S DEACONDRROCK PRAIRIERDPKGREENS PRAIRIE RDVICTORIA AVERAILROAD CROSSING AT CAPSTONE DRIVE PLANNED TO BE REMOVED & RELOCATED TO BARRON ROAD RAILROAD CROSSING AT SOUTH DOWLING DRIVE PLANNED TO BE REMOVED & RELOCATED TO REALIGNED ROYDER ROAD EXISTING AT GRADE RAILROAD CROSSING TO BE REMOVED EXISTING GRADE SEPARATED CROSSING EXISTING AT GRADE RAILROAD CROSSING PROPOSED GRADE SEPARATED CROSSING PROPOSED RELOCATION OF AT GRADE RAILROAD CROSSING * At Grade Railroad Crossing - Level with the street * Grade Separated Crossing - An overpass or underpass DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Page 318 of 414 Air Travel Easterwood Airport is a non-hub regional airport and is currently owned and operated by the Texas A&M University System. The 700-acre airport is located on the west side of the University, in northwest College Station. Its elevation is 320.6 feet and there are two runways in operation. The William A. McKenzie Terminal provides commuter flights to the cities of Dallas and Houston. Easterwood supplies fuel and flight planning for Life Flights and Military Medi-vac flights. In 2022, United Airlines discontinued flights out of Easterwood Airport to George Bush International Airport. Additionally, the extension of FM 249 and its toll facility has improved travel access to Houston airports. Page 319 of 414 NEXT STEPS The Existing Conditions Report serves as the foundation for the 5-year comprehensive plan update process, providing critical insights into current trends and future needs. The information outlined in this report will shape the development of the updated Comprehensive Plan and guide its implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. This iterative approach ensures the plan remains adaptable and responsive to the community’s evolving needs and priorities. Next steps will focus on collaboration and engagement with key stakeholders, including residents, local businesses, and city officials, to ensure the updated plan reflects shared goals and values. The evaluation and appraisal of the plan will be overseen by an appointed Comprehensive Plan Evaluation Committee, which will provide recommendations to inform the update process. 91 Page 320 of 414 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT TEAM Heather Wade, Principal Planner, Project Manager Christine Leal, Long Range Planning Administrator Ashley Klein, Staff Planner Matt Cline, GIS Analyst Julie Svetlik, GIS Analyst Molly Hitchcock, Assistant Director Jason Schubert, Transportation Planning Administrator Jesse Dimeolo, Senior Planner Lucero Valenzuela, Multimedia Coordinator Joelene Tomecek, Multimedia Manager OTHER CONTRIBUTORS Ramiro Martinez, PE, Engineering Operations Manager, Water Services Kim Voitier, Utilities Administration Manager, Utilities Debbie Eller, Director, Community Services Gustavo Roman, Assistant Director, Community Services David Brower, Community Development Analyst, Community Services Joshua Brooks, Community Development Analyst, Community Services Brian Piscacek, Assistant Director, Economic Development and Tourism Stacey Vasquez, Economic Development Coordinator Richard Mann, Fire Chief Stuart Marrs, Fire Captain Mary Ellen Leonard, CPA, Director, Fiscal Services Michael Isermann, Assistant Director, Parks and Recreation Billy Couch, Police Chief, Police Caroline Ask, Division Manager - Solid Waste, Public Works Page 321 of 414 References Bureau of Labor Statistics (n.d.). OEWS Chart. Www.bls.gov. https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/area_lq_chart/area_lq_chart.htm# CITY OF COLLEGE STATION APPROVED ANNUAL BUDGET. (n.d.). https://cdnsm5-hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_12410832/File/Departments/Fiscal%20Services/Budget.pdf Forbes, J. (2024, January 30). The 10 Most Bikeable Cities in Texas. Redfin | Real Estate Tips for Home Buying, Selling & More. https://www.redfin.com/blog/most-bikeable-cities-in-texas/ Houston, S. (n.d.). MUNICIPAL ANNEXATION IN TEXAS. https://www.tml.org/DocumentCenter/View/1233/Annexation-Paper-TML-July-2019PDF LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER 43. MUNICIPAL ANNEXATION. (n.d.). Statutes.capitol.texas.gov. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LG/htm/LG.43.htm Parks and Recreation Department. (2024). Parks and Recreation Map. Arcgis.com. https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/0e8f97be3d544d1ab0045144a9aa968c/#data_s=id%3AdataSource_1-18bb9a71a1a-layer-2%3A5 Pedestrian Safety Campaign. (n.d.). Www.txdot.gov. https://www.txdot.gov/safety/traffic-safety-campaigns/pedestrian-safety.html Poole, J.M., W.R. Carr, D.M. Price, and J.R. Singhurst. 2007. Rare Plants of Texas. Texas A&M University Press, College Station. Recognitions/Rankings. (2024). Cstx.gov. https://www.cstx.gov/our_community/recognitions__rankings Realtor.com, Housing Inventory: Median Listing Price in College Station-Bryan, TX (CBSA) [MEDLISPRI17780], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEDLISPRI17780, September 16, 2024. Realtor.com, Housing Inventory: Median Listing Price per Square Feet in College Station-Bryan, TX (CBSA) [MEDLISPRIPERSQUFEE17780], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEDLISPRIPERSQUFEE17780, September 16, 2024. Ricketts, T.H. et al. 1999. Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Stebbins, Samual. 2022. College Station, TX Will be Among the Fastest Growing Cities by 2060. https://247wallst.com/city/college-station-tx-will-be-among-the-fastest-growing-cities-by-2060/ SATP - HOME. (2020). Mysocialpinpoint.com. https://burnsmcd.mysocialpinpoint.com/txdot-statewide-active-transportation-plan/home/ Statewide Active Transportation Plan. (2024). Txdot.gov. https://www.txdot.gov/projects/projects-studies/statewide/statewide-active-transportation-plan.html Texas Comptroller. 2024. “CENTRAL TEXAS REGION 2024 Regional Report.” https://comptroller.texas.gov/economy/economic-data/regions/2024/central.php. The 2024 regional reports utilize sources from JobsEQ, REMI, Texas A&M Real Estate Center, Texas Department of Transportation, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Texas Demographic Center (2022). Projections of the Total Population of Texas and Counties in Texas, 2020-2060 (0.5 Migration Scenario). Retrieved February 21, 2024, from https://demographics.texas.gov/Resources/TPEPP/Projections/2022/2022statetotsex_mig100.csv Texas Department of Transportation. 2024. Bryan District Bicycle Plan Story Map.https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/dc4a6d0571e041d784aad9cdc114cfcd Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. “Target Species East Central Texas Plains (Post Oak Savannah) Ecoregion.” https://tpwd.texas.gov/huntwild/wild/wildlife_diversity/texas_nature_trackers/target_species/east_central_plains.phtml#collapseSix. Accessed on June 17, 2024. Texas Water Development Board. (2022). Texas.gov. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/flood/planning/regions/8/index.asp U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Selected Characteristics of Health Insurance Coverage in the United States.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2701, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S2701?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Physical Housing Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2504, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S2504?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Demographic Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2502, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S2502?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Occupancy Characteristics.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2501, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.93 Page 322 of 414 S2501?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Occupation by Class of Worker for the Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2406, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S2406?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Occupation by Sex for the Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2401, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S2401?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Disability Characteristics.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1810, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S1810?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Language Spoken at Home.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1601, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S1601?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Educational Attainment.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1501, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S1501?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “School Enrollment.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1401, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S1401?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Marital Status.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1201, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S1201?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Commuting Characteristics by Sex.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S0801, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S0801?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Geographic Mobility by Selected Characteristics in the United States.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S0701, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S0701?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Age and Sex.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S0101, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S0101?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Data Profiles, Table DP05, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP1Y2023.DP05?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Selected Housing Characteristics.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Data Profiles, Table DP04, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP1Y2023.DP04?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Selected Economic Characteristics.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Data Profiles, Table DP03, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP1Y2023.DP03?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Selected Social Characteristics in the United States.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Data Profiles, Table DP02, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP1Y2023.DP02?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau. (2024). Explore Census Data. Census.gov. https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST5Y2022.S2504?g=160XX00US4815976 U.S. Climate Data. (2024). https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/college-station/texas/united-states/ustx2165. Accessed on July 1, 2024. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), “Local Education Agency (School District) Universe Survey”, 2016-17 v.2a, 2017-18 v.1a, 2018-19 v.1a, 2019-20 v.1a, 2020-21 v.1a, 2021-22 v.1a, 2022-23 v.1a. U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency, All-Transactions House Price Index for College Station-Bryan, TX (MSA) [ATNHPIUS17780Q], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ATNHPIUS17780Q, September 16, 2024. 94 Page 323 of 414 cstx.gov/CompPlan Page 324 of 414 IMPLEMENT ATION PROGRESS REPORT Page 325 of 414 Contents INTRODUCTION Chapter 2: DISTINCTIVE PLACES Chapter 3: STRONG NEIGHBOHOODS Chapter 4: A PROSPEROUS ECONOMY Chapter 5: ENGAGING SPACES Chapter 6: INTEGRATED MOBILITY Chapter 7: EXCEPTIONAL SERVICES Chapter 8: MANAGED GROWTH Chapter 9: COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP 3 4 13 19 29 36 42 52 55 Page 326 of 414 The Comprehensive Plan identifies 98 action items intended to achieve the community’s vision and goals for the future. This report compiles the status of each action item, along with metrics and community changes over the past five years. In 2022, the City began to use collaborate project management software to track the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan in real time. Data from this program, along with information gathered during interviews and staff research, was used to inform the action item updates below. STATUSES On track: The action item is progressing as expected.Off track: The item is not progressing as expected; there are issues or delays. At risk: The action item is in danger of not being achieved. If the issues are resolved, the action item may still be completed. Not started: The action item has not yet begun.Achieved: The action item has been completed and resulted in the intended outcome. INTRODUCTION 3 Page 327 of 414 DISTINCTIVE PLACES GOAL: Vibrant and distinct districts, attractive neighborhoods, revitalized gateways and corridors, and conserved natural areas, grounded in environmental stewardship and resiliency. HIGHLIGHTS SINCE 2019 2 Small Area Plans Created 7 Plans Retired CHAPTER 2 4 Page 328 of 414 UNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM 60F M 2 1 5 4 PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYHOLLEMAN DR SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD SH 6 S H 6 RD ROCK FM 2154TE X A S A V E S FM 2818 FM 2 8 1 8 F M 2 1 5 4 EAGLE AVEROCK PRAIRIE R D DEACON DRGRAHAM RDSOUT H WEST PK WY KRENEK TAP RDHOLLEMAN DRHARVEY RDFRANCIS DRLINCOLN AVEUNIVERSITY DR ES H 6 C-3 Light Commercial R-1B Single Family Residential R-4 Multi-Family R-6 High Density Multi-Family R&D Research and Development M-1 Light Industrial M-2 Heavy Industrial OV Corridor Overlay RDD Redevelopment District NPO Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay NCO Neighborhood Conservation Overlay NAP Natural Areas Protected R Rural E Estate RS Restricted Suburban GS General Suburban D Duplex T Townhouse MF Multi-Family MU Mixed-Use MHP Manufactured Homes O O ice WE Wellborn EstateWW WRS Wellborn Restricted SuburbanWW SC Suburban Commercial GC General Commercial CI Commercial Industrial BP Business Park BPI Business Park Industrial C-U College and University P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use Development PDD Planned Development District NG-1 Core Northgate NG-2 Transitional Northgate NG-3 Residential Northgate WPC Wolf Pen Creek WC Wellborn CommercialWW MH Middle Housing ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay HOO High Occupancy Overlay REZONINGS 2019-2023 0 1.50.75 Miles 5 Page 329 of 414 0 1.50.75 Miles 1 2 5 6 4 3 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 2021-2023 1 Boundary adjustment of theNortheast Gateway Redevelopment Area - 2023 1 Boundary adjustment of the Harvey Road RedevelopmentArea - 2023 2 Neighborhood Center to MixedResidential - 2022 3 Suburban Residential to Neighborhood Commercial - 2022 4 Business Center to Neighborhood Commercial - 2023 5 Medical to Urban Residential - 2022 URBAN CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER GENERAL COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL BUSINESS CENTER URBAN RESIDENTIAL MIXED RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL ESTATE RESIDENTIAL RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION MEDICAL INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY PARKS & GREENWAYS NATURAL & OPEN AREAS REDEVELOPMENT AREAS 6 Suburban Residential to Neighborhood Commercial - 2022UNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM 60F M 2 1 5 4 PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYHOLLEMAN DR SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD S H 6 S H 6 RD ROCK FM 2154TE X A S A V E S FM 2818 FM 2 8 1 8 F M 2 1 5 4 EAGLE AVEROCK PRAI RIE RDDEACON DRGRAHAM RDSOUTH WEST P K WY KRENEK TAP RDHOLLEMAN DRFRANCIS DRUNIVERSITY DR ES H 6 6 Page 330 of 414 ACTION ITEM STATUSES 2.1 On Track Review and undertake amendments to the Unified Development Ordinance’s zoning districts. 2020 Amendments • Single-Family Residential Dimensional Standards Ordinance Amendment • Adopted January 23, 2020. • Allowed flexibility in the design and layout of detached single-family subdivisions through an additional side setback option, while maintaining the fifteen (15) feet of building separation intended for these types of developments. • Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Ordinance Amendment • Adopted March 9, 2020. • Removed references to the Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay and the Conservation Study. Added Garage Requirement and Garage Size to the Options for Inclusion. Updated the Tree Preservation section to clarify that trees are to be barricaded and preserved during demolition and/or construction as measured by a radius and adds the option to exclude specific tree species from preservation requirements. Provided the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO) Petition Committee the option to include a maximum number of Off-Street Parking spaces, parking area and location per yard, and required driveway width between 12 and 25 feet. Allowed for anyone to be a member of the Petition Committee for any subdivision. Added meeting sign-in sheets, and minutes signed by a Petition Committee member to the list of requirements for a complete NCO application. • Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay Ordinance Amendment • Adopted June 11, 2020. • Established the Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay as a retired district. Established the NPO as a retired district, did not change the requirements for the one existing NPO in the Glenhaven Estates subdivision. Ensured that no one may request an NPO in the future. If a subdivision wishes to establish a single-family overlay district, they should petition for a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO). 2021 Amendments • Restricted Occupancy Overlay (ROO) Ordinance Amendment • Adopted April 19, 2021. • Created a new overlay zoning option for single-family subdivisions to restrict occupancy to no more than two unrelated persons. An application for a ROO requires a majority (50% + one) of a subdivision’s property owners to sign a petition supporting the application. A legacy (grandfather) clause allows existing occupancy levels up to four unrelated persons to continue under certain conditions. The City’s existing restrictions of no more than four unrelated persons remained for all areas without the overlay. 7 Page 331 of 414 2022 Amendments • Shared Housing Ordinance Amendment • Adopted October 13, 2022. • Created a new use known as Shared Housing, which allows for more than four unrelated persons to occupy a single dwelling unit. This ordinance established which zoning districts the use is allowed in, development standards for the use, and eliminated the Northgate High Density Dwelling Unit use. • Single-Family Overlay Amendment (ROO & NCO) Ordinance Amendment • Adopted October 27, 2022. • Amended the single-family overlay application process for the Restricted Occupancy Overlay (ROO) and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO) to allow multiple contiguous phases of original subdivisions to apply jointly, submit one application, and pay one application fee. • Middle Housing Ordinance Amendment • Adopted October 27, 2022. • Created a new Middle Housing zoning district, which allows for a flexible mix of housing types between single-family homes and multiplexes and established development standards for each housing type. 2023 Amendments • Conditional Use Permit Ordinance Amendment • Adopted March 23, 2023. • Amended Conditional Use processing, specifically giving the UDO Administrator the ability to approve minor changes to a Conditional Use permit, stating the duration of a Conditional Use permit, giving the City the ability to temporarily suspend a Conditional Use for public health and safety reasons, clarifying how a violation of the terms of a Conditional Use permit is unlawful, and establishing a process to revoke a Conditional Use permit. • High Occupancy Overlay (HOO) Ordinance Amendment • Adopted September 14, 2023. • Created a new overlay zoning district that allows Shared Housing uses. • Middle Housing Zoning District Parking Ordinance Amendment • Adopted September 14, 2023. • Modified the current ordinance to allow up to four vehicles to park in the front yard area of a lot that is zoned MH Middle Housing. Also, clarified access requirements for parking in the rear yard area. • Shared Housing Ordinance Amendment • Adopted October 26, 2023. • Modified the current ordinance to permit Shared Housing uses in the MH Middle Housing zoning district only when there is also a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. • Flood Ordinance Amendment • Adopted December 11, 2023. • Modified the current ordinance to include requirements for replacement of manufactured homes in existing manufactured home developments. 2024 Amendments • Conditional Use Permits and Nonconforming Uses Ordinance Amendment • Adopted October 24, 2024. • Modified conditional use permit requirements and the expiration of conditional use permits and nonconforming uses, and required nightclubs, bars, and taverns in NG-1 and NG-2 to follow the conditional use permit process. 8 Page 332 of 414 2.2 On Track Prioritize and undertake detailed plans for priority neighborhoods, districts, corridors, or redevelopment areas. • Wellborn District Plan updated and adopted 10/12/2023 • This update covers 2023-2033 and serves as a statement of the Wellborn community’s vision for the future. It provides goals and actions on a broad range of topics and provides strategic direction to maintain the rural character of Wellborn while managing small-scale growth and maintaining a high quality of life. • Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan created and adopted 9/28/2023 • The plan imagines changes to the area to better serve the two major corridors that intersect within the redevelopment area and complement the nearby hospitality corridor, Eastgate area, and Texas A&M University campus. 2.3 On Track Creative incentives and programs to revitalize existing areas and established neighborhoods. • HOME Investment Partnerships American Rescue Plan Program (HOME-ARP) Grant • The LEAD Program created in 2024 addresses the needs of vulnerable residents by using trauma-informed case management, family counseling, support services, benefits navigation, and life/financial coaching as well as assisting clients financially to stabilize the household to prevent homelessness. • Section 108 Loan • Adopted the LULAC Oak Hill Apartment Rehabilitation in 2021 This effort includes the rehabilitation of a 50-unit complex with land use restrictions ensuring availability to low-income elderly renters. • The Community Development Block Grant CARES Act (CDBG-CV) Program • The COVID Disaster Response Program 2020 included numerous programs to assist residents with rental and utility payments among other necessities, as well as to provide local business with support during the pandemic. 2.4 On Track Evaluate existing policies and create incentives for low impact and sustainable development. • Impervious Cover Ordinance Amendment • Adopted March 9, 2020. • Provided a maximum percentage of the lot that may be covered with impervious surfaces. These percentages vary and are implemented and assessed based on the property’s zoning district. The amendment only applies to single-family residential zoning districts. There is additional flexibility that allows for different percentages to be used if an accepted drainage analysis or study is performed. • Housing Action Plan • Adopted September 12, 2024. • The Housing Action Plan was with the support of a citizen steering committee with the goal of recommending available tools to create or incentivize affordable housing opportunities for residents. • Landscape Requirements update in progress. This update is intended to create to a more user-friendly format for customers and staff, provide alternative landscaping guidelines (Xeriscaping), promote the protection of existing canopy trees, and alleviate some of the heat island effects through canopy tree placement. 9 Page 333 of 414 2.5 On Track Pursue feasibility of a tree preservation and/or tree planting incentive program. • Created the Cooling College Station Plan • Secured grant funding and planted 117 trees in two City parks since 2023. • In 2024, the Parks and Recreation Department coordinated two tree giveaways: • Texas Native Tree Giveaway (1450 trees). • Loblolly Pine Tree Giveaway (1500 seedlings). 2.6 Achieved Create additional incentives for conservation design and evaluate the effectiveness of cluster development standards in the Unified Development Ordinance. • Cluster Subdivisions Ordinance Amendment • Adopted July 28, 2022. • Amended the Cluster Developments section of the Unified Development Ordinance to reduce the minimum lot width and depth of a residential lot and increase the amount of required open space. 2.7 On Track Integrate parks, greenways, and community facilities within new neighborhoods. • Multi-Family Park Land Dedication Ordinance Amendment • Adopted July 29, 2019. • Updated the Parkland Dedication section by modifying the fee schedule so that land dedication requirements for multifamily developments are proportional to the fee-in-lieu dedication. • Parkland Dedication Ordinance Amendment • Adopted June 9, 2022. • Eliminated the distinction between community and neighborhood parks for dedication purposes, reduced the number of parkland dedication zones to four, added an appeals process, allowed developers of private parks to receive up to a 25% credit, and updated the dedication and fee amounts. • New Park Developments: • 2019: • Northgate • Fun For All Playground • Greens Prairie Reserve • 2020: • Midtown Reserve • The Planning & Development Department continued to formalize connectivity through the platting process. Connectivity to Texas Independence Park was incorporated in the expansion of the Midtown Reserve subdivision in 2024, with the Midtown’s preliminary plan ensuring connections to the park. 10 Page 334 of 414 2.8 On Track Evaluate and update development standards in the Unified Development Ordinance. 2019 Amendments • Sidewalk Fee In Lieu Ordinance Amendment • Adopted March 14, 2019. • Allowed Fee in Lieu of Construction for sidewalks to be determined by the Administrator rather than the Planning & Zoning Commission. • Block Length Ordinance Amendment • Adopted March 28, 2019. • Removed Block Perimeter requirements and exemptions from block length requirements were added for single-family development plats and minor plats. In addition, the Thoroughfare Plan Functional Classification and Context Class Map is now the measurement guide for Block Length and Cul de Sac Length. • Lots Made Nonconforming by Annexation Ordinance Amendment • Adopted August 8, 2019. • Updated the Nonconformities section to explicitly state that lots and platted or partially platted building plots made nonconforming through annexation are allowed to replat, provided the replat brings the property closer to compliance with current zoning district standards. 2022 Amendments • Cluster Subdivisions Ordinance Amendment • Adopted July 28, 2022. • Amended the Cluster Developments section of the Unified Development Ordinance to reduce the minimum lot width and depth of a residential lot and increase the amount of required open space. • Sidewalks Ordinance Amendment • Adopted October 27, 2022. • Amended Sidewalks section of the Subdivision Regulations to reduce the number of zones for fee in lieu of sidewalk construction to four, added an appeals process, allowed staff to require fee in lieu, and required sidewalks along thoroughfares in rural context areas. 2023 Amendments • Lot-by-Lot Grading Ordinance Amendment • Adopted June 12, 2023. • Created a requirement that single family construction must account for, and provide, lot grading information to mitigate drainage issues between properties upon redeveloped and initial development. • Off-Street Parking Requirements Ordinance Amendment • Adopted August 10, 2023. • Amended Sections 5.8.B Northgate by adding tandem parking as a design option for structured parking garages. Amended Section 7.2.J Bicycle Facilities by removing bicycle requirements and placing them in Section 7.3 “Off-Street Parking Standards.” Amended Section 7.3 by adding in bicycle parking, updating minimum and maximum ratios, removing minimum parking requirements from redevelopment areas, and adding additional reductions to parking requirements. 2.9 Not Started Develop or refine incentives to promote high quality design. 11 Page 335 of 414 2.10 On Track Encourage parking alternatives to support redevelopment opportunities. • Off-Street Parking Requirements Ordinance Amendment • Adopted August 10, 2023 • Amended Sections 5.8.B Northgate by adding tandem parking as a design option for structured parking garages, Section 7.2.J Bicycle Facilities by removing bicycle requirements and placing them in Section 7.3., and Section 7.3 by adding in bicycle parking, updating minimum and maximum ratios, removing minimum parking requirements from redevelopment areas, and adding additional reductions to parking requirements. 2.11 On Track Continue to initiate proactive zoning map updates. Initiated proactive rezonings to Middle Housing in strategic areas to help provide more housing options and to implement the community’s vision expressed in the Comprehensive Plan. Allowed private owners, developers, and the market to add needed housing stock in appropriate areas over time as a neighborhood evolves. • Completed Phase 1 of City-initiated MH Middle Housing rezoning in 2023. 1753 Lots. 363.33 Acres. • Completed Phase 2 of City Initiated MH Middle Housing rezoning in 2024. 254 Lots. 43.88 Acres. 2.12 On Track Continue beautification programs. • Maintained partnership with Keep Brazos Beautiful. • Public Works relocated trees from the intersection of State Highway 6 and University Drive to various corridors and parks. Moved the trees to various locations, including near the intersection of Texas Avenue and FM 2818 and in front of the College Station post office. • Public Works is currently determining median plantings for recently completed road projects and is considering using drought tolerant native plantings to enhance the median while using less or no irrigation. 12 Page 336 of 414 STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS GOAL: Viable and attractive neighborhoods that maintain long- term neighborhood integrity while collectively providing a wide range of housing options and other services for a diverse population. HIGHLIGHTS SINCE 2019 4 New Parks Housing Action Plan Adopted in 2024 +2,963Multi-Family Units +2,282Single-Family Units +152Duplex Units +281Townhouse Units CHAPTER 3 13 Page 337 of 414 0 31.5 Miles NEW RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNITS 2019-2023 UNIVERSITY DRFM 60 PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYHOLLEMAN DR SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD S H 6 RD ROCK TE X A S A V E S FM 281 8 FM 2 8 1 8 F M 2 1 5 4 GRAHAM RDSH 6UNIVERSITY DRFM 60PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYHOLLEMAN DR SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD S H 6 RDROCK TE X A S A V E S FM 281 8 FM 2 8 1 8 F M 2 1 5 4 GRAHAM RDSH 6 LOW HIGHMID RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BASED ON NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY 14 Page 338 of 414 3.1 Not Started Evaluate the effectiveness and refine neighborhood compatibility standards in the UDO. 3.2 On Track Create a neighborhood planning toolkit. • The Neighborhood Toolkit program was created 10+ years ago and is updated every 2 years to ensure it is relevant and reflects the most current policies and information. • Created a toolkit specifically for starting new neighborhood associations to assist groups who need help getting started with the organization process. 3.3 On Track Create and promote a housing maintenance educational program. • The Community Services Department is developing a series of housing maintenance education videos for public consumption. • Compiled scripts for the videos and began pre-production with the Public Communications department. 3.4 On Track Expand affordable housing and workforce housing. • The Community Services Department made significant strides in expanding affordable and workforce housing opportunities by implementing strategic initiatives, funding programs, and partnerships to support low- and moderate-income residents in College Station. • Released the 2024 Affordable Housing Request For Proposal, solicited proposals from local partners for the expansion of affordable housing opportunities in College Station. • Created the Housing Action Plan in 2024. The plan seeks to provide new avenues for providing affordable housing as well as programs to increase homeownership. • Contributed Community Development Block Grant funds towards the demolition of a dilapidated structure to allow for the construction of Unlimited Potential facilities. • Unlimited Potential aims to provide comprehensive support and resources to empower young adults aging out of foster care as they transition into independent living. • Partnered with Elder Aid, a local Certified Housing Development Organization (CHDO), following their response to an Affordable Housing Request for Proposal to develop a funding agreement that will allow for the construction of a new housing unit to be maintained as a rental unit for low-and- moderate income citizens of College Station 3.5 At Risk Develop a parking strategy for neighborhoods near the university. • Conducted a paid parking pilot program in FY24. In 2024, City Council provided direction that a permanent parking program was not to be pursued at this time. 15 Page 339 of 414 3.6 On Track Develop and refine data monitoring processes to analyze housing trends and define a strategic set of actions to address housing affordability, diversity, and gentrification. • The Community Services Department performed multiple actions to monitor data and analyze trends: • Adopted the Housing Action Plan in 2024. The goal of the Housing Action Plan is to investigate available tools to create or incentivize affordable housing opportunities for residents. • Developed an internal dashboard to monitor progress on and reporting mechanisms for field devices for the Housing Conditions Survey. • Completed the Housing Conditions Survey in 2020, initiated process for the 2025 survey. • Completed the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing report, a document that aims to contextualize historic and systemic housing issues faced by the citizenry in 2023. • Conducted annual Point in Time Count, a count of people experiencing homelessness who are sheltered in emergency shelters, transitional housing, and Safe Havens on a single night. The count informs strategic planning as it pertains to homeless populations. 3.7 On Track Continue to track neighborhood change. • The Community Services Department tracked neighborhood character through ongoing updates to its Rental Registration Program and Short-Term Rental lists, using third-party analysis and internal screenings develop a better understanding of neighborhood character. • The City conducts a Housing Conditions Survey every five years. The last survey was completed in 2020. 3.8 Achieved Evaluate relevancy of neighborhood and small area plans that are beyond their planning horizon. In 2022, the Planning & Development Services Department developed a process to evaluate and retire small area plans that are beyond their planning horizon. • Adopted Phase 1 of the Small Area Plan Audit in 2022. Retired the following 4 plans: • The Central College Station Neighborhood Plan, 2010 • The Eastgate Neighborhood Plan, 2011 • The Southside Area Neighborhood Plan, 2012 • The South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan, 2013 • The 2013 Wellborn Community Plan was retained and updated in 2023 to the Wellborn District Plan. • Phase 2 of the Small Area Plan Audit was adopted in 2024. Retired the following 3 plans: • The 1996 Northgate Redevelopment Plan with the 2003 Northgate Redevelopment Implementation Plan • The 1987 Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan • The 2012 Medical District Master Plan 16 Page 340 of 414 3.9 On Track Continue partnering with local nonprofit organizations and area partners to support affordable housing options. • The Community Services Department has partnered with numerous nonprofit organizations, including: • Elder-Aid • BVCAP • LULAC • Twin City Mission • Received the 2024 CDBG Best Project Recognition Award by HUD for the work done with the LULAC non-profit organization. • Maintained representation in the Health, Housing, Homelessness, and Hunger Coalitions. • Sustained ongoing partnerships with 10 local nonprofit organizations • Hosted the United Way Fundraiser and Fall Festival in 2024. • Partnered with LULAC Oak Hill to rehabilitate 50 units of affordable housing for income-qualifying residents of College Station. • Issued a Request For Proposal and collaborated with Elder Aid to acquire a duplex intended for use as low- and moderate-income housing. • Provided funding to three public service agencies (Catholic Charities, Big Brothers Big Sisters, and the Prenatal Clinic). • Developed a new Public Service Agency evaluation committee that evaluated 6 new applications for PSA funding. 3.10 On Track Continue outreach and educational efforts to support existing and encourage new neighborhood organizations. • The Neighborhood Services Department operated several programs: • The Weekly Neighborhood Newsletter sent to registered homeowners and neighborhood associations. • The Monthly Seminar Supper, which highlights a topic of conversation or provides updates for different neighborhood stakeholders. • The Annual Citizens University, an annual, 12- week behind the scenes program that allows citizens to see how the City of College Station operates. • Developing a high school version of Citizens University be done either in late May or early June 2025. • Took over the monthly Community Living Course in 2024 where people aged 18-24 years-old who have been sent by the Municipal Court Judge take a class that features information on being a good neighbor, City ordinances, and more. • Partnered with the Aggie Moms to provide them with welcome bags to share with their children that are students at Texas A&M. • Distributed welcome bags to neighborhood groups and citizens. 17 Page 341 of 414 3.11 On Track Continue to fund the Neighborhood Grant Program • The Neighborhood Grant program continued to be funded each year by the Council. It has been expanded several times over the last few years beyond landscaping projects. • Responded to the requests from neighborhoods to make the program easier to use and more flexible to account for the various sizes of our neighborhoods and their ability to do projects. • Allowed for sign toppers. • Customized street signs. • Increased flexibility with adopted projects. • Currently anticipate having at least 4-6 applications from the neighborhoods. • One active recipient is the Devonshire HOA for landscaping and irrigation. 3.12 On Track Require neighborhood meetings for certain development applications. • As of 2022, Project Proposal Meetings with neighborhoods and surrounding residents are required for all proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments. • Neighborhood meetings are required for all Single-Family Overlay Zoning requests including the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO) and Restricted Occupancy Overlay (ROO). 3.13 On Track Maintain property maintenance enforcement efforts. • Code Enforcement continued to employ best practices involving Property Maintenance issues and continued to educate owners on issues within the City. 3.14 On Track Evaluate the effectiveness of short-term rental regulations. • The Community Services Department employs a third-party data collection agency to scour the internet for newly listed short-term rentals. • Identified 406 Short-Term Rentals not registered. 3.15 On Track Evaluate and refine the rental registration program. • Developed new analysis techniques in GIS to maintain programmatic sustainability and help identify rental properties which are not registered with the Rental Registration program • Registered 4,406 long term rentals since 2019. 18 Page 342 of 414 PROSPEROUS ECONOMY GOAL: A diversified economy with a wide variety of competitive jobs and support for entrepreneurs that provides a tax base to support the City’s ability to foster a high quality of life where economic prosperity is widespread. Unlike the other chapters of the Comprehensive Plan, the action items in chapter 4 are contained in a separate Master Plan. The College Station Economic Development Master Plan was adopted by the City council in 2020 and guides the community’s economic development path for the next 5-10 years. The intent of the master planning process is to ensure growth and development advance the City’s economic development objectives. The process should also further College Station’s goal of “ensuring a diversified economy, generating quality, stable, full-time jobs; bolstering the sales and property tax base; and contributing to a high quality of life.” CHAPTER 4 19 Page 343 of 414 The following table contains the action items and status updates of the Economic Development Master Plan SUPPORT AND PARTNER WITH REGIONAL ALLIES TO ATTRACT HIGH-END INVESTMENT 1 Focus efforts on recruiting Aggie-owned and led businesses to College Station • Executed contract with The Cannon to establish a virtual incubator concept for small business owners/entrepreneurs and provide local resources for College Station’s current and future businesses. • The Economic Development Department engaged with local entrepreneur groups, including weekly meetings with One Million Cups to network with area entrepreneurs/business leaders. 2 Continue partnerships with regional economic development partners such as the Brazos Valley Economic Development Corporation (BVEDC) to raise the profile and compete for high-end investment opportunities. • Continued partnerships and collaboration with Greater Brazos Partnership (GBP, formerly BVEDC), Brazos County, and TAMU affiliates to market eligible sites for significant industrial development, including the City’s Midtown Business Park. 3 Maintain direct dialogue with existing businesses to aid in their abilities to expand their presence in the community. • Hosted quarterly “Business Over Breakfast” events as a business retention and expansion program. • Economic Development served as a liaison with local business owners to keep businesses informed on City projects and events. • Created a monthly newsletter through partnership with Tourism and Economic Development to keep businesses updated on events and anticipated visitors coming to the area, as well as a mobile visitors pass to entice visitors to visit local establishments while in town. • Added an annual Christmas mobile pass. 4 Focus on retaining students by connecting them with internships, and post-graduation employment. Action was not pursued. 5 Engage in frequent communication and cooperation with Texas A&M and the Texas A&M System, especially regarding opportunities in the private sector (e.g. RELLIS). • Maintained communication with various TAMU system agencies and departments, including Texas A&M AgriLife Extension and the system real estate office. • The Economic Development Department presented biannually to TAMU’s student Economic Society. 20 Page 344 of 414 SUPPORT RETAIL DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES 1 Continue to promote the City’s market opportunities to retailers and developers trying to enter the local market on the economic development website. • Continued collaboration with The Retail Coach regarding attracting desired retailers/developers to College Station. • Attended ICSC and Retail LIVE. • Currently preparing for the execution of a real estate agreement with a developer on the City-owned 28-acre site next to Costco. • New marketing collateral to assist with representing underutilized areas and vacant spaces to potential users. 2 Develop retail reinvestment strategies to enhance mixed-use opportunities and commercial area upgrades. • The City purchased the former Macy’s building at Post Oak Mall and has engaged with mall ownership and other entities for the prospective redevelopment of the site. Maintained communication with area developers/brokers regarding specific properties and locations along key thoroughfares, such as University Drive/Texas Avenue. • Pursuing a redevelopment effort in the Northgate area. 3 Ensure land use planning and development regulations provide for adequate ability to respond to market opportunities. • Worked in conjunction with Planning & Development Services Department regarding proposed land uses and redevelopment areas such as the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan. 4 Use financial and other incentives to aid underperforming or underutilized business sites when appropriate. • Partnered with Community Development Department to coordinate delivery of Community Development Block Grant CARES Act (CDBG-CV) Program funds because of the COVID-19 pandemic. • Collaborated with various public agencies on the development of a bridge loan program to help support ailing businesses. 5 Start retail business retention and expansion (BRE) visits to encourage growth and additional locations. • Attended Chamber of Commerce ribbon cuttings, participated in annual Chamber Day visits, established a monthly newsletter for local businesses with information regarding the number of visitors expected for sports events and conventions. • Attended Pre-Application-Conferences and assisted as needed with facilitating communication between various departments. 21 Page 345 of 414 6 Pursue retail entertainment opportunities. • Continued collaboration with The Retail Coach regarding marketing the community to desired entertainment users. • Attended ICSC and Retail LIVE annually to assist with recruitment of entertainment users. 7 Consider establishment of a gateway improvement incentive program. • Action was not pursued. Analyzing potential of gateway program with the recently adopted Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan. 8 Encourage retail redevelopment where ample infrastructure exists. • Actively marketed second-generation spaces to backfill via The Retail Coach, tradeshow attendance, and collaboration with local brokers. • Successfully redeveloped the former Albertson’s along University Drive into a new center that includes a fitness user and an elevated outdoor retailer. 9 Seek retail opportunities near City assets (e.g. Texas Independence Ballpark and Veterans Park). • Continued discussion with TAMU System real estate office regarding TAMU-owned property and their plans for development. • Undertook the marketing and potential sale of 28-acres next to Costco across from Midtown Business Park. • The ballpark referenced in this action item is no longer being pursued, but the potential of additional ballfields at Veterans Park is being analyzed. SUPPORT EXPANSION AND RELOCATION OF CORPORATE INVESTMENT AND PEOPLE 1 Continue to promote market opportunities to companies, realtor/brokers, and site selectors to attract of high-end jobs and investment in biotechnology, advanced manufacturing, and other key industries that can utilize our highly skilled workforce. • Continued outreach and collaboration with GBP, Brazos County, local realtor/brokers, potential users, and site selectors regarding opportunities at City-owned and private business parks. • Sold the last remaining lots within the College Station Business Center for office/manufacturing/distribution uses. • Reviewed targeted industries, updating marketing collateral; focused additional efforts on Animal Health in partnership with TAMU. 22 Page 346 of 414 2 Coordinate outreach to these sectors through direct City marketing as well as regional partners such as Texas A&M and BVEDC. • Greater Brazos Partnership (GBP) attended various site selector events and signature industry gatherings, such as the BIO International Convention, representing College Station and the Brazos Valley area. • Focused efforts to market through university and system channels to former Aggies who are leaders in their respective industries. 3 Ensure land use planning and development regulations provide adequate opportunities to respond to market opportunities. • The Economic Development Department collaborated regularly with the Planning & Development Services team on prospective projects and participated in the review of commercial and industrial permits and related activities. • Conducted regular “Business over Breakfast” engagement opportunities with local business leaders, the Economic Development Department leveraged this feedback mechanism to influence City approaches. 4 Ensure necessary infrastructure and public services are adequate and available when needed to serve development opportunities. • The Economic Development Department coordinated regularly with fellow City staff from Electric, Water/Wastewater, Public Works, CIP, and others to stay well-informed of new projects and system improvements. • Focus has been devoted to the Midtown Business Park, which is the City’s most recent and largest space available for industrial development. Over this plan period, the Economic Development Department refined infrastructure capacities and cost proposals for prospective development. 5 Support infrastructure to ensure critical sites (e.g. Midtown) are ready for development. • The Economic Development Department, in coordination with the Capital Improvement Projects Department and Fiscal Services, maintained cost estimates for needed infrastructure for the build-out of the business park, which is contingent upon the sale of the property for industrial development. • The portion of the park fronting onto Midtown Drive has been heavily marketed, as the infrastructure is online, making this site (approx. 45 acres) shovel ready. 6 Highlight business parks and other available sites on the economic development website. • Worked in conjunction with the Public Communications Department regularly to ensure the industry and business park portions of the website are up-to-date and marketed accurately. 23 Page 347 of 414 7 Maintain dialogue with existing business to support their expansion. • The Economic Development Department coordinated business retention and expansion activities with the Greater Brazos Partnership (GBP), including visits to companies within the targeted industries. • Collaborated with fellow public partners on a $300 million expansion of the FUJIFLM Diosynth Biotechnologies, LLC campus in 2021/2022, along with a Texas Enterprise Zone Program nomination for the project. • FERA Diagnostics and Biologicals purchased property in a City-owned business park in 2024, growing from a smaller location in Aggieland Business Park to this new company headquarters and manufacturing facility. 8 Pursue Foreign Trade Zone designation for sites in College Station. Action was not pursued. 9 Advance efforts to retain students’ post-graduation and re-attract Aggies of all ages. • Executed contract with The Cannon to establish a virtual incubator concept for small business owners/entrepreneurs and provide local resources for College Station’s current and future businesses. • Engaged with local entrepreneur groups, including weekly meetings with One Million Cups to network with area entrepreneurs/business leaders. 10 Directly contact U.S. market areas with large senior populations that are considering relocation and communicate College Station’s many advantages. • Leveraged social media to demonstrate its advantages as a senior destination, often touting rankings and recognitions resonating with that demographic. For example, in 2024, Realtor.com named College Station as one of the top 10 cities to retire. SUPPORT ATTRACTION AND EXPANSION OF DESTINATION ENTERTAINMENT AND HOSPITALITY ACTIVITIES 1 Expand and enhance City and partner facilities to attract athletic, cultural, and business events. • With the inclusion of Visit College Station, the City brought the tourism convention and visitor bureau services within direct City oversight and joined it alongside Economic Development. • Collaborates regularly with Texas A&M representatives amongst athletics and various departments with respect to convention and sports events. • Undertaking analyses for a recreation center and convention center to supplement the existing civic facilities. 24 Page 348 of 414 2 Expand partnerships with hospitality groups and providers (EBCS, Texas A&M) to target and promote select events. • In 2020, the City of College Station brought College Station tourism in-house and rebranded as Visit College Station, encompassing all leisure, meetings, and sports sales and servicing activities. • Expanded partnerships with Texas A&M athletics and the local hospitality market through signature events and activities, as well as dedicated campaigns like “Christmas in College Station.” 3 Tie those opportunities to strategies to augment existing venues such as Wolf Pen and select areas such as the Northgate District. • The Northgate District has been featured annually through the “Christmas in College Station” campaign as home to the department’s signature holiday market event, Howdy Holly-Days, as well as spring and fall vendor markets to coincide with other major on-campus events. • The Wolf Pen Creek amphitheater continued to be utilized as an open-air space for music and celebration, hosting welcome gatherings for large events and an annual concert series. • The Economic Development Department engaged with prospective retailers on adjacent sites to better activate the space around the park. 4 Partner with and strengthen existing events in the community and on campus. • The City partnered with Texas A&M and the City of Bryan to create a new university liaison position to help coordinate events and activities on campus. • The Tourism team worked with Texas A&M athletics on several major initiatives, including youth championship track and field events at Texas A&M facilities as well as two signature sports/concert events in summer 2024 at Kyle Field. 5 Combine entertainment recruitment efforts with TAMU wherever possible. • Maintained continuous communication with TAMU staff and work in conjunction on various events utilizing TAMU’s facilities. 6 Explore retail opportunities surrounding athletic complexes. • Continued collaboration with the TAMU System real estate office regarding TAMU-owned property around Veterans park and other areas throughout the City. 7 Focus on mid-week business conferences and meetings (corporate tourism). • The Tourism sales team attended tradeshows actively marketing College Station and its facilities to potential clients. • Hosted the annual Meeting Planners Showcase each March, connecting prospective meeting planners to local hospitality providers. • Maintained relationships with area hotels to increase number of room nights booked and worked in conjunction with TAMU on various events. 25 Page 349 of 414 8 Seek ways to enhance the use of and activities at Wolf Pen Creek. • Promoted the former Sears Service Center which is adjacent to Wolf Pen Creek Park to various “eatertainment concepts” to further enhance the walkability and entertainment focus of the area. 9 Highlight City assets such as Northgate and Wolf Pen Creek as viable entertainment venues. • Organized and promoted recurring events in the Northgate District such as Homegrown at Northgate and Howdy Holly-Days. • The Economic Development and Tourism Department worked in conjunction with the Parks Department to assist with proposed development ideas regarding the former Sears Service Center adjacent to Wolf Pen Creek. SUSTAIN AND ENHANCE HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE 1 Continue to promote enhanced mobility options for residents and visitors. • Integrated shared micromobility options for students and visitors and continued to augment its provision of bike lanes, especially in heavily trafficked areas. • Collaborating with the Brazos Transit District and Texas A&M Transportation on public transit alternatives, especially for major events. 2 Seek high quality entertainment and arts opportunities for residents and visitors. • Continued focus on recruitment of entertainment concepts with our retail consultant, The Retail Coach. • The Economic Development Department facilitated the Popstroke development adjacent to Century Square, offering a new form of activity/entertainment to locals and visitors alike. 3 Support walkable development with a concentration of activities. • The Economic Development Department encouraged additional development near major assets, including the university. • Century Square, a Public-Private Partnership on land owned by the Texas A&M System, has grown to become the area’s signature entertainment district, with space to live, work, dine, and play. • Additional development is anticipated near the site to create a walkable destination for both residents and visitors. • Other areas of focus include future commercial retail development in south College Station. 26 Page 350 of 414 4 Promote enhanced flight options at Easterwood Airport. • Maintained ongoing dialogue with airport operations and assist as needed in their recruitment of additional carriers. • In 2022, United Airlines ceased operations at Easterwood Airport as part of a wider contraction, resulting in currently only one carrier with daily flights to DFW. 5 Message quality of life amenities to the community and beyond. • Created marketing materials to illustrate Quality of Life amenities available to potential employers through a “Live, Learn, Play” campaign. 6 Recruit a variety of internet service providers to community. • Suddenlink, the primary area internet service provider, rebranded to Optimum and continued to invest in upgrading its infrastructure for both business and residential customers. • Frontier has installed new fiber throughout the community, and Comcast plans to enter the College Station market with fiber infrastructure installation anticipated over the next few years. 7 Focus on land use planning and redevelopment opportunities surrounding campus and in key corridors. • Maintained continuous communication with TAMU Real Estate staff to discuss potential development opportunities on A&M-owned property. • Created various promotional materials and marketed opportunities to desired entertainment/retail users and developers. • The Economic Development Department continued to work closely with developers on prime privately- owned tracts near TAMU campus to identify desired uses. 8 Create and maintain high quality and diverse employment opportunities. • Longitudinal industry data has demonstrated further diversification in the College Station economy, with a larger share of employment opportunities growing in the private sector compared to the public sector. Those industries with the greatest annual percentage growth are typically those with higher average wages - specifically management occupations, healthcare, and legal services. ENHANCE COMMUNITY HEALTH AND WELLNESS 1 Support hospital systems in their efforts to grow and diversify medical facilities and service offerings (mental health, wellness programs). • The City maintains flexible guidelines on incentive-based development agreements for occasions that may arise, including those related to the medical ecosystem in College Station. Both systems have supplemented their offerings: CHI St. Joseph acquired the former College Station Medical Center, and Baylor Scott & White is constructing a new surgical center adjacent to the existing hospital building. 27 Page 351 of 414 2 Ensure land use planning and development regulations provide adequate options to respond to market opportunities. • Land use planning and zoning provide for compatible uses near Baylor Scott & White and CHI St. Joseph hospitals 3 Maintain ongoing dialogue with providers to aid in their ability to expand their presence in the community. • Maintained connections with local hospital systems and regularly collaborates with the regional economic development corporation concerning healthcare and medical services infrastructure. 4 Ensure connectivity between City-sponsored health, wellness, and fitness programs and the regional medical community. • The City has partnered with both health systems regarding the provision of its health and wellness programs. Continued to sponsor the annual BCS Marathon along with Baylor Scott & White. This partnership demonstrates the City’s commitment to wellness and functions as a tourism driver, bringing visitors from all over to run in the event, which acts as a Boston Marathon qualifier. 5 Strategically use incentives to attract key medical services and aid existing providers in their ability to expand services (e.g. Strategic Behavioral Health). • An Incentives webpage was added to the economic development website, which references what the City can offer to facilitate development, including those in medical services. 6 Highlight City’s medical infrastructure as a recruitment tool on the economic development website. • The healthcare ecosystem is highlighted on the existing economic development website (grow.cstx.gov) under Quality-of-Life amenities. The City will undertake a redesign of the existing website within the next year, and additional improvements to the content and layout will follow. 7 Consider complimentary medical uses around major hospitals. • In recent years, senior housing has been developed near each hospital, providing convenient access for residents. 8 Maximize City assets such as walking and biking trails. • Continued to invest in multimodal transportation, and the Economic Development Department highlights pedestrian- and bike-friendly routes in business recruitment collateral to showcase the City’s quality-of-life amenities. 28 Page 352 of 414 ENGAGING SPACES GOAL: Highly desirable parks, greenways, arts and cultural amenities that support high-quality experiences for residents and visitors. Highlights Since 2019 4 NEW PARKS CHAPTER 5 29 Page 353 of 414 0 1.50.75 Miles PARKS GREENWAYS Cemetery Sales/Maintenance Shop1 Aggie Field of Honor Improvements2 Thomas Park 3 Veterans Park Phase 14 Veterans Parks Phase 1B5 Lincoln Center Playground6 Gabbard Park 7 Bee Creek Park & Adamson Lagoon8 College Station Cemetery 9 Central Park Improvements10 Fun For All Phase II11 Fun For All Playground12 Fun for All Phase 213 Central Park Improvements14 Steeplechase Park Improvements15 Midtown Reserve Parkland Dedication16 M.D. Wheeler Ph 2 Parkland Dedication17 Lick Creek Hike and Bike Trail (Underpass)18 Wellborn Settlement Parkland Dedication19 Greens Prairie Reserve Parkland Dedication20 NEW PARKS & IMPROVEMENTS 2019-2023 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20UNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM 60F M 2 1 5 4 PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYHOLLEMAN DR SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD S H 6 S H 6 RD ROCK FM 2154 TE X A S A V E S FM 281 8 FM 2 8 1 8 FM 2 1 5 4 ROCK PRAIRIE RDDEACON DRGRAHAM RDSOUTH WEST P K WY KRENEK TAP RDUNIVERSITY DR ES H 6 30 Page 354 of 414 ACTION ITEM STATUSES 5.1 On Track Continue to support, promote, and operate major arts, entertainment, sporting, and cultural destinations through cumulative actions. • Hosted over 20 sporting events per year at Veterans Park and Athletic Complex (VPAC), sports complexes, and school district facilities. • Secured and hosted major tournaments, including: • Triple Crown Sports Southwest Summer Nationals • Alliance Southern Championship • State 7v7 Football Tournament • Concerts & Arts Events: • Supported multiple arts events across College Station. • Planned and hosted the Starlight Music Summer Concert Series. • Community Celebrations & Engagement: • Hosted the first-ever “I Heart America” 4th of July event in 2024 at Wolf Pen Creek, featuring fireworks, a drone show, and live music. • Released the Seasonal Guide, promoting recreational activities across the community 5.2 On Track Maintain and expand community-based greenway and open space preservation programs. • The Adopt-a-Greenway program continued to engage community volunteers in maintaining parks and greenways. • Collected 74 forty-gallon trash bags from 264 acres of adopted greenways and parks in 2024. • Expanded the program to include stormwater outfall inspections, supporting the City’s MS4 requirements and goals. • The Parks Department assumed stewardship of greenways. • City Council approved a new position for FY 25, a Volunteer and Community Engagement Coordinator. 5.3 On Track Continue to expand outreach about the parks and greenway system. • The Parks & Recreation Department engaged in community outreach through various marketing and communication efforts. • Maintained an updated and user-friendly website. • Highlighted articles in local and regional publications. • Engaged with the community through media interviews and radio advertising. • Released seasonal Parks & Recreation Guides, including: • The Spring Guide (January–April). • The Summer Guide (May–August). • The Fall Guide (September-December). • Used flyers, sandwich board notifications, and online announcements to promote events and programs. • Hired a Marketing Coordinator to develop marketing strategies. • Regularly updated the City website calendar to keep the public informed. • Provided information through the new “I Heart CS” digital monthly newsletter and appearances on What’s Up College Station. 31 Page 355 of 414 5.4 On Track Support a community-wide public art program. • Worked with the Arts Council of the Brazos Valley to initiate a mural program. • Held an inaugural mural festival to celebrate the completion of the murals. • Completed five murals • Additional opportunities for murals or other public art identified for future years will be considered by City staff in coordination with the Arts Council of the Brazos Valley. 5.5 On Track Continue leisure, health, and educational programming. • The Parks & Recreation Department continued to offer a variety of leisure, health, and educational programs for residents of all ages, with ongoing efforts to expand and refine offerings based on community interest. • Spring 2024 Programs: • Educational & Outdoor Activities: • World Migratory Day, Park in the Dark, City Nature Challenge Observation Day • Health & Wellness: • Holistic Health, Meditation, Senior Fitness Classes, Karate, Birding 101, Fly Fishing • Summer Offerings: • Youth Programs, Nature Center, Mini Camps, Survival Adventures, Nature’s Science Academy, Fly Tying Class • Public Swim Lessons • Wellness & Outdoor Activities • Meditation, Birding 101, Holistic Health Days • Senior Programs: • Fitness & Recreation • Walking groups, Fitness center access, Body/brain games • Social & Leisure Activities • Table games, Arts and crafts, Potluck socials, Bingo, Dances 5.6 On Track Identify and secure public and private funds for the acquisition of parks, greenways, and facilities. • The College Station Parks Foundation was formed in 2023. • Updated the Fun for All Playground (FFAP): • Completed bench and table installations. Additional play structures, shade, swings, and fall zone construction completed in the fall of 2024. • Moved the Plaza/Donor Wall Enhancement Project forward with funds allocated by the FFAP Committee. • Submitted Texas Independence Park Texas Parks and Wildlife Community Park Grant application for further enhancements in 2024. 32 Page 356 of 414 5.7 On Track Continue inter-agency coordination and establish new public-private partnerships to provide additional amenities, funding, networking, and co-production opportunities. • Mow and Grow Zones established for urban stream restoration and riparian habitat improvement. • Partnered with Texas Water Resources Institute (TWRI), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), and volunteer organizations. • Native plant installation and erosion monitoring over a three-year period. • Heat Island Tree Planting Project at Tarrow Park & Bee Creek Park. • Worked with Texas A&M Forest Service, Brazos County Master Naturalists in 2024. • Supported Native Seed Bank & Tree Planting Initiatives. • Submitted application for a $750,000 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Outdoor Grant for Texas Independence Park construction in 2024. • Currently planning the annual Games of Texas event • Collaboration between school districts, Texas A&M University, City of Bryan, and private businesses to bring a statewide event to Bryan/College Station. 5.8 On Track Evaluate, amend, and develop relevant ordinances to protect natural resources, habitats, and green-water infrastructure. • Parkland Dedication Ordinance Amendment • Adopted June 9, 2022. • Eliminated the distinction between community and neighborhood parks for dedication purposes, reduced the number of parkland dedication zones to four, added an appeals process, allowed developers of private parks to receive up to a 25% credit, and updated the dedication and fee amounts. 5.9 Not Started Investigate the feasibility of incorporating riparian buffer standards to preserve sensitive land along waterways. 5.10 On Track Consider new and enhanced natural resource management strategies that promote environmental sustainability and stewardship and improve quality of life. • Initiated execution of the “No mow zone” at Wolf Pen Creek as part of a three-year erosion study. • Finalized planned improvements to Butterfly Alley to enhance and support butterfly migration awareness. • Submitted the Bird City USA application. • Implemented the Urban Heat Island Mitigation Tree Planting. • 988 15-gallon trees and 1,500 5-gallon seedlings. 33 Page 357 of 414 5.11 On Track Invest in the redevelopment of existing parks. • Completed • Lick Creek Bird Blinds • New construction of two bird blinds • Under Construction • Bachmann Park • Little League, Senior League, and Soccer building demolition and reconstruction • Bee Creek & Central Park • Tennis court improvements • Fun For All Playground • Expanded park play structures & shading • Bee Creek & Central Park • Tennis court renovations • Anderson Park • New futsal/multi-use courts and four pickleball courts. • Central & Bee Creek Parks • New tennis court construction 5.12 On Track Conduct community-wide parks and recreation needs assessments and pursue recommended improvements. • Started Parks & Recreation Department Master Plan update • Gathered public input on Southeast College Park • Developed Park Condition Assessment Plan while collecting data for parks asset management work order system to better monitor and plan for park maintenance. • Began Community Recreation Center feasibility study. • Received and incorporated public comments, requests and concerns regarding the construction of three new Baseball fields planned for the Veterans Park and Athletic Complex (VPAC). 5.13 Not Started Identify a land acquisition strategy and integrate additional greenspace. 34 Page 358 of 414 5.14 On Track Create connections between key elements of the parks, recreation, greenways systems, and destinations. • Completed Lick Creek/Midtown Trail Hike and Bike Trail improvements. • Completed connectivity improvements to the Lick Creek/Midtown Hike and Bike Trail in 2024. • Plans included a connected trail design from the Smith tract to the Art & Myra Bright Park & Carter’s Creek Park. • Applied for a grant to construct segment of Spring Creek Hike and Bike trail. • Approved the Texas Independence Park Master Plan in 2024. • This new park will highlight the use of trails within the park as well as making connections to the Lick Creek Trail and the new pedestrian shared use path being constructed along Rock Prairie Rd. 5.15 On Track Design and construct inclusive, accessible, and sustainable parks and greenway trails. • Completed an improved trail access/connection at the Mid-Town bridge along the Lick Creek Corridor. • Developed design elements at Thomas Park and Texas Independence Park which include inclusive, accessible and sustainable park considerations. • Constructed a new inclusive playground for 2–5-year-old children in 2024 at the Fun For All Playground located within Central Park. • This unique park encourages children of all abilities to share experiences and play together while removing boundaries and creating a sense equality and inclusion. 35 Page 359 of 414 INTEGRATED MOBILITY GOAL: An innovative, safe, and well-connected, multi-modal mobility system serving all user types that is designed to support the surrounding land uses. Highlights Since 2019 11.6 MILES OF NEW MULTI-USE PATHS 7.6 MILES OF NEW BIKE PATHS CHAPTER 6 36 Page 360 of 414 0 1.50.75 MilesUNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM 60F M 2 1 5 4 PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYHOLLEMAN DR SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD S H 6 S H 6 RD ROCK FM 2154TE X A S A V E S FM 2818 FM 2 8 1 8 F M 2 1 5 4 EAGLE AVEROCK PRAIRIE RDDEACON DRGRAHAM RDSOUTH WEST P K WY KRENEK TAP RDHOLLEMAN DRHARVEY RDFRANCIS DRLINCOLN AVEUNIVERSITY DR ES H 6 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS NEW STREETS STREET WIDENINGS STREET RECONSTRUCTIONS MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS 2019-2023 37 Page 361 of 414 UNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM 60F M 2 1 5 4 PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYHOLLEMAN DR SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD SH 6 S H 6 RD ROCK FM 2154 TE X A S A V E S FM 281 8 FM 2 8 1 8 F M 2 1 5 4 EAGLE AVEROCK PRAIRIE R D DEACON DRGRAHAM RDSOUTH WEST PK WY KRENEK TAP RDHOLLEMAN DRHARVEY RDFRANCIS DRLINCOLN AVEUNIVERSITY DR ES H 6 0 1.50.75 Miles BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS SHARED USE PATHS CONSTUCTED SIDEWALKS CONSTRUCTED BIKE FACILITIES CONSTRUCTED BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS 2019-2023 38 Page 362 of 414 ACTION ITEMS STATUSES 6.1 On Track Implement complete street and context sensitive design. • Worked with the City of Bryan to update the Streets section of the Bryan/College Station Unified Design Guidelines, including implementation of complete street designs. • Context-sensitive design continued to be standard practice for the Planning & Development Services and Capital Improvement Departments. • Currently evaluating the feasibility of updating the City’s thoroughfare cross sections to offer more alternatives for consideration in street design and construction. • The creation of a new Active Transportation Master Plan is underway and may identify other best practices to be considered for implementation. 6.2 On Track Conduct a Thoroughfare Plan audit. • Adjusted the Thoroughfare Plan with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in fall 2021. • The Traffic Congestion & Mobility Analysis is in progress and is assessing 50 intersections for potential modifications to relieve traffic congestion while accommodating other modes of travel. 6.3 On Track Enhance and upgrade intersections. • The Capital Improvement Department managed several intersection upgrade projects. In total, more than 20 street projects with intersection upgrades are under design or construction. These include: • Durham Loop and Midtown Drive • University Drive Pedestrian Improvements Project from Boyett Street to South College Avenue • William D Fitch Parkway and Pebble Creek Parkway to Lakeway Drive • Holleman Drive / Wellborn Road (FM 2154) Intersection project initiated by TxDOT • University Drive East and Veterans Park • State Highway 30 (Harvey Rd) Widening • Holleman Dr West/ Jones Butler Rd Roundabout • Barron And Decatur • Pebble Creek Pkwy and William D. Fitch • Greens Prairie & Arrington Intersection 6.4 On Track Continue to evaluate and implement best management practices to increase bicycle and pedestrian use. • Currently evaluating best management practices as part of a potential update of the City’s thoroughfare street cross sections that includes alternatives for bicycle and pedestrian facility design. • Currently updating the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan as a new Active Transportation Master Plan. This plan will include a level of traffic stress assessment for the existing bicycle and pedestrian network and potential updates to the current practices and program. 39 Page 363 of 414 6.5 On Track Undertake streetscape improvements within gateways and image corridors. • The third gateway sign located at the intersection of Highway 47 and Raymond Stotzer Parkway is under construction and is expected to be complete in FY 2025. • The FY 2025 budget included a fourth gateway. 6.6 On Track Evaluate transit funding partnerships. • The FY25 City budget included funding for Brazos Transit District (BTD) to assist in closing the funding gap created by the reduction in federal and state funds. Brazos County and City of Bryan are providing funding as well. BTD has established the Brazos Urbanized Area committee comprised of executive staff of local jurisdictions and transit advocates to assist with recommendations on service levels and funding needs in upcoming years. 6.7 Not Started Prioritize programs and improvements that will reduce vehicular demand. 6.8 On Track Maintain the various funding programs for mobility projects. • Assisted the Bryan-College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in developing its next 25- year Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), which was adopted in December 2024. • Included future TxDOT funding for projects along high priority corridors of State Highway 6, FM 2154, SH 30, SH 40, FM 2818, FM 2347, and the Bush/Wellborn Interchange. • Implementation of the projects in the adopted City capital improvements program, including those from the 2022 bond election, is on-going. • Continued collaboration with several regional mobility partners on project funding, including the Brazos County Regional Mobility Authority, the Bryan-College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Transportation Improvement Program, and the Texas Department of Transportation. 6.9 On Track Fund bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and safety improvements. • Council adopted significant funding for sidewalk and trail projects in summer 2024. These funds will be used to construct priority sidewalk and trail projects identified in the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. • Recently funded road rehabilitation projects for improvements to bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and safety include: • Foster Avenue • Lincoln Avenue • George Bush Drive • Rock Prairie Road • Consultant selection is underway for design and construction of high priority sidewalk and trail projects identified in the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. • Currently evaluating potential additional funding available through the Bryan-College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and state and federal grant programs. 40 Page 364 of 414 6.10 Not Started Develop performance measures, collect transportation data, and monitor trends. 6.11 Not Started Evaluate Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) requirements. 6.12 Not Started Evaluate and update access management strategies. 6.13 Not Started Develop and implement a travel demand management program. 41 Page 365 of 414 EXCEPTIONAL SERVICES GOAL: Exceptional municipal facilities and services that meet community needs, contribute to community character, exhibit environmental stewardship and resiliency, support surrounding land uses, incorporate full life-cycle costs, and are coordinated and fiscally responsible . CHAPTER 7 42 Page 366 of 414 0 1.50.75 Miles NEW CITY FACILITIES & IMPROVEMENTS 2019-2023 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 I Heart Aggieland Sign 1207 Texas Avenue-Visit College Station3 4 New Police Headquarters Arnold Road Fuel Station6 5 CCWWTP Centerifuge New City Hall2 7 Rock Prairie Road Water Tower 8 Lick Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant 9 City Gateway Sign PUBLIC SAFETY GENERAL SERVICES WATER/WASTEWATERUNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM 60F M 2 1 5 4 PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYHOLLEMAN DR SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD SH 6 S H 6 RD ROCK FM 2154 TE X A S A V E S FM 281 8 FM 2 8 1 8 FM 2 1 5 4 EAGLE AVEROCK PRAIRIE R DDEACON DRGRAHAM RDSOUTH WEST P K WY KRENEK TAP RDHOLLEMAN DRUNIVERSITY DR ES H 6 43 Page 367 of 414 ACTION ITEMS STATUSES 7.1 On Track Prioritize utility and service improvements in existing areas. • Capital Improvement Projects to accomplish this action item • FY19 • Carter’s Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Office Remodel • Phase: Construction • Estimated construction completion: Spring 2025 • City Gateway Sign #3 (West) • Phase: Construction • Estimated construction completion: 2025 • Lick Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Capacity Expansion • Phase: Warranty • Estimated construction completion: Fall 2023 • Marion Pugh -Holleman to George Bush • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: Late 2026 • McCulloch Rd Rehab (wastewater) • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: Winter 2025 • Summit Crossing Park • Phase: Bidding • Estimated construction completion: 2025 • Victoria Roundabout • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: Spring 2026 • FY20 • James/Puryear Rehab • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: Pending • Luther Rehab (Marion Pugh to Penberthy) • Phase: Construction • Estimated construction completion: Fall 2024 • Rock Prairie Rd East Widening • Phase: Construction • Estimated construction completion: Fall 2025 • Security Fencing for Well #5 • Phase: Construction • Estimated construction completion: Winter 2023 • WD Fitch Rehab Ph1 (SH30 to Tonkaway) • Phase: Construction • Estimated construction completion: Fall 2025 • WD Fitch Rehab Ph2 (Tonkaway to Rock Prairie) • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: Summer 2026 44 Page 368 of 414 • FY21 • Francis Drive Phase 3 • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: Pending • Holleman Dr W at Jones Butler Rd. Roundabout • Phase: Bidding • Estimated construction completion: Fall 2025 • Krenek Tap Rehab • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: Winter 2025 • SH40 Water Line (Victoria-Sonoma) • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: TBD • FY22 • FM2818 Utility Relocations • Phase: Complete • Estimated construction completion: Spring 2024 • FY23 • 1207 Texas Avenue Renovation • Phase: Complete • Estimated construction completion: Summer 2023 • Drainage Improvements at Milliff and Redmond • Phase: Construction • Estimated construction completion: Fall 2025 • Drainage Improvements at Stallings Drive and University Oaks Blvd. • Phase: Complete • Estimated construction completion: 2024 • Midtown Crossing • Phase: Complete • Estimated construction completion: Fall 2023 • FY24 • Bee Creek Phase 3 • Phase: Construction • Estimated construction completion: Fall 2024 • Carter Creek Blower Buildings Nos. 2 & 3 • Phase: Construction • Estimated construction completion: Winter 2024 • Jones Butler Extension and Roundabout • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: 2028 • McCulloch Rehab • Phase: Construction • Estimated construction completion: Winter 2025 • SH 40 Waterline (Graham- Baron) • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: TBD • Water Wells 10, 11, 12 • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: 8/15/2028 • Water Wells Collection Line • Phase: Design • Estimated construction completion: 8/15/2028 45 Page 369 of 414 7.2 On Track Develop a comprehensive facilities plan. • Completed the first iteration of a facilities master plan in April 2024. This focused on municipal Court, Utility Customer Service, Public Works Operations, College Station Utilities, and Parks Administration. • Potentially conducting two additional phases to provide a comprehensive analysis of all City facilities. • Phase 2 would capture all other City buildings not included in Phase 1 (approximately 39 buildings). • Phase 3 would provide a lifecycle analysis for all buildings addressed in Phases 1 and 2. Additional funding will be needed for these phases. 7.3 On Track Continue capitalizing on opportunities to achieve multiple community objectives through coordinated infrastructure projects. • Capital Improvement Projects Department coordinated with Public Works, Water Services, Electric, and Planning & Development Services on all capital projects as needed and appropriate. Several projects in FY25 involve this coordination, including: • The College Heights Utility Rehab • The McCulloch Road Rehab and Krenek Tap Reconstruction 7.4 On Track Continue to build resiliency in municipal operations and services. • Development and adoption of the Brazos County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan continued in FY24, with implementation to follow. • Several actions proposed in the plan will help build resiliency within municipal operations and services, including a collaborative strategy on sheltering during extreme weather events. 7.5 Achieved Evaluate the utilization of community paramedicine. • The College Station Fire Department evaluated the feasibility of community paramedicine and determined that this community’s demand does not meet the minimum threshold for the implementation of this program. 7.6 On Track Continue to pursue recognition, credentials, and accreditations City-wide. • As a standard practice, City staff pursue individual and departmental recognition, credentials, and accreditations. These include, but are not limited to the: • Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) accredited Police Department & Public Safety Communications • Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI) accredited Fire Department and Insurance Service Office (ISO) Class 1 community rating • Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA) accredited Parks & Recreation Department • State of Texas rated Superior Water Services Department; American Public Works Association (APWA) accredited Public Works Department and Water Services Department • Richard R. Lillie, FAICP Planning Excellence recognized Planning & Development Services Department 46 Page 370 of 414 7.7 On Track Continue to sustain and grow emergency management preparedness. • The Brazos County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan update continued in FY24, with implementation to follow. • Several actions proposed in the plan will help build resilience to natural hazards and emergencies, including educational materials shared with residents to build preparedness. • The Fire Department completed the Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) in 2024. 7.8 On Track Continue using business intelligence, data analytics, and data visualization tools. • Departments collected and analyzed data from various sources, including citizen feedback, social media, traffic data, and sensor data, to gain valuable insights. These insights are used to inform policy decisions, such as infrastructure planning, transportation improvements, and public safety initiatives, that are tailored to the specific needs of the residents of College Station. Completed: • Cybersecurity Study in 2019 • Enhanced electronic processes and online communication for employees during COVID-19 pandemic • Upgraded the City’s Firewall protection Upcoming: • Creating dashboards for various services • Cybersecurity training • Device identification • Replacing traffic switch devices • Updating fiber infrastructure • Purchased new fiber equipment in 2022 • Changing from 48 strand to 96 strand • Updating badge readers 7.9 On Track Continue to expand wi-fi to public buildings. • The Information Technology Department ensured all new or renovated City buildings were equipped with sufficient wi-fi services. All wi-fi services include a free public option and a secure employee-only internal City network. • Expanded wi-fi at Veterans Park to provide Venders with a dedicated bandwidth. 7.10 On Track Update public service plans. • Implemented elements of the Water System Master Plan and the Wastewater System Master Plan adopted April 2017. • Stormwater Management Plan continued implementation, with updates made as needed. • Currently updating to the Solid Waste Service and Rate Study. • This will include rates and routes/schedules. 47 Page 371 of 414 7.11 On Track Utilize municipal service cost-benefit assessments in planning utility expansion. • Began using Fiscal Impact Analysis Model in 2024 • The intent of this project is to get a better understanding of what the costs and benefits of development are likely to be. 7.12 Not Started Evaluate ways to reduce energy consumption. 7.13 On Track Pursue and support local water conservation and reuse initiatives. • Used reclaimed water for irrigating municipal properties when feasible. • Authorized to use reclaimed water at the Veterans Park and Athletic Complex. Since 2021, approximately 80 million gallons of reclaimed water have been applied to this facility, significantly reducing overall domestic water demand in the community. • The Water Services Department initiated Stage 1 drought restrictions in August 2023. • Continued to monitor water usage and encourage conservation. 7.14 On Track Continue outreach and educational programs to reduce resource consumption. • The Solid Waste Division • Continued to encourage the participation in single stream recycling though public outreach in numerous ways • Radio appearances • Podcasts • Blog posts • Updated the Recollect mobile app • Updated and distributed the Solid Waste and Recycling Guide for 2024-2026. • Assisted Twin Oaks Landfill with Household Hazardous Waste Collection twice a year. • Operated a recycling program for single-family homes through BVR Waste and Recycling. • Water Services Department • The 2024 Water Conservation Plan was adopted by the City Council and the Texas Water Development Board. • Outlined updated strategies for reducing water consumption and promoting efficiency. • Included the Irrigation Controller Rebate program, adopted in the FY25 budget. • Incentivized customers to upgrade to smart irrigation controllers. • Smart irrigation controllers use sensors or internet connectivity to adjust watering schedules based on local weather and landscape conditions. • Continued to conduct reviews every five years to comply with regulatory requirements and ensure effectiveness of the plan. 48 Page 372 of 414 • Energy Management Division • Participated in many outreach and educational programs with steady participation from both citizens and developers in these programs. • Neighborhood block parties • Home and garden shows • Parade of Homes • Citizens’ University • Utility billing inserts • The City website • Worked closely with Utility Customer Service and engaged daily with key accounts as well as customers over the phone and through on-site, home and business energy audits. 7.15 On Track Continue to implement best practices in meeting or exceeding State and Federal standards for stormwater management. • Continued progress on yearly Stormwater Management Plan Best Management Practices. • Notice of Intent for next 5-year Stormwater Management Program to be submitted to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) in February 2025. • Next annual Stormwater Management Program certification is due March 2025. 7.16 On Track Advance sound floodplain management practices. • Continued to implement the higher floodplain management standards identified with our FEMA NFIP Class 6 Rating. • Held 5-Year Cycle Verification meeting and Community Assistance Call with FEMA in 2024. • Continued to implement best practices in meeting or exceeding State and Federal standards for stormwater management. 7.17 On Track Continue to meet or exceed State and Federal water quality standards for drinking water sources. • The City of College Station consistently or exceeded State and Federal water quality standards for drinking water and maintained a superior water system rating, with no violations reported by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). • Completed a third water tower to improve system operations and efficiency in 2023. • In 2023, the City’s water system was re-designated as a “Superior Water System”. • Adopted the design of three new water wells to increase capacity. • Existing wells are being rehabilitated to enhance production in 2024. 7.18 On Track Continue to keep wastewater collection and treatment capacities ahead of demand. • Continued the phased expansion of the City’s wastewater system, including the completion of the Lick Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Project, which increased capacity from 2 MGD to 5 MGD. • This project ensured compliance with regulatory standards and addressed both peak demands and projected long-term needs. • Initiated or completed several new wastewater conveyance systems to support the demands of a growing community. 49 Page 373 of 414 7.19 On Track Continue coordinated electric planning along with area partners. • The College Station Utilities Electric Department continued to collaborate with other departments and customers on new and proposed developments. These are covered through normal business processes in Electric and through the City’s development practices 7.20 On Track Design high-quality public facilities that reflect the character of their surroundings. • The Capital Improvement Projects Department developed numerous public facilities following the public facility guidelines. The design intent is to have a consistent design scheme and appearance across city facilities and be recognizable as a City of College Station facility. • 2019 • College Station Utilities • Portable Building (Water) • Larry Ringer Library • Outdoor Reading Pavilion • 2020 • New Police Department Annex • New Police Department Annex • Portable Building (Electric) • Central Park• Pavilion • Bee Creek Park • Bee Creek Concession & Restrooms • Fun for All Park • Building 1 • Building 2A • Building 2B • Graham Rd Substation • Substation • Control House • Portable Building (Electric) • Portable Building (Water) • 2021 • Central Park • Athletic Restrooms & Storage • Veterans Park Athletic Center • Restrooms #3 • Spring Creek Substation • Battery House • New City Hall • Veterans Park Athletic Center • Restrooms #4 • 2022 • New Facility Maintenance Building • 2023 • I Heart Aggieland Sign • Rock Prairie Water Tower • College Station Memorial Cemetery/Aggie Field of Honor • Shop Building 50 Page 374 of 414 7.21 On Track Design City facilities and infrastructure to incorporate sustainable and resilient practices. • Capital Projects staff worked to incorporate sustainability and resilience in City facilities and infrastructure. • Several projects, including upgrades at the Arnold Road fuel station and the future installation of generators at the Lincoln Center and the Bob & Wanda Meyer Senior Center. 7.22 On Track Provide public safety facilities to maintain adequate service and response times. • Opened new Police Department building in 2019. • Designed and funded Station 7. Approved by voters in the 2022 bond election. The station is expected to open in the fall of 2026. 51 Page 375 of 414 MANAGED GROWTH GOAL: Fiscally responsible and carefully managed development that is aligned with growth expectations and the ability to provide safe, timely, and efficient infrastructure and services. Highlights Since 2019 POPULATION INCREASE +7,213 CHAPTER 8 52 Page 376 of 414 ACTION ITEMS STATUSES 8.1 On Track Prioritize proactive infrastructure investments and programs in strategic redevelopment and infill areas. • The Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Area Plan contains action items related to infrastructure investments to catalyze redevelopment in this area. Capital Improvement Projects already completed, under construction, or in design: • Design and construction of a new City Hall • Completed: Summer 2022 • Designed and renovated Economic Development/Tourism Building 1207 Texas Ave. • Completed: Summer 2023 • Design and construction of a Bus Shelter at City Hall • Expected completion date: Fall 2025 • Rehab of Francis Drive from Texas Ave to Walton. • Expected completion date: Pending. • Construction of sidewalk along the west side of Foster Avenue from Walton Dr to George Bush Dr. • Expected Completion Date: 2025 • Design of vertical bicycle separation barrier along George Bush from Texas Ave. approaching FM 2154. • Completed February 2025 • Design and Construction of Lincoln Ave from Texas Ave to University Dr • Expected Completion Date: Fall 2025 • Rehabilitation of water and wastewater lines in the vicinity of Eisenhower St., University Dr., Jane St. and Nimitz St. with approximately 4,000 LF of 8” water distribution line and 2,000 LF of 12” water distribution line. • Expected Completion Date: 2027 8.2 On Track Amend the zoning map and consider regulatory incentives to encourage infill and redevelopment. • Adopted proactive zoning map amendments to MH Middle Housing, some of which were within redevelopment areas. • Adopted Phase 1 in 2023. • Adopted Phase 2 in 2024. 8.3 On Track Re-envision underutilized retail uses and incentivize redevelopment and/or reuse of vacant building s and properties. • Through strategic partnerships, targeted recruitment efforts, and ongoing collaboration with Texas A&M, the Economic Development and Tourism Department facilitated redevelopment opportunities in vacant properties: • Pursued collaboration with a retail consultant to recruit retail entertainment, destination/specialty retailers, and restaurant brands not currently in Brazos County, with a focus on backfilling vacancies along primary City corridors. • Included consideration of redevelopment opportunities for the former Macy’s and Sears service center along Holleman Drive. • Attended state and national retail conferences alongside the consultant to engage with regional and national brands, brokers, and developers. • These efforts contributed to the recruitment of Popstroke, a new entertainment destination, which opened on TAMU system property adjacent to Century Square. 53 Page 377 of 414 • Continued engagement with Texas A&M regarding a potential partnership for redevelopment at Post Oak Mall. • Considered a Request for Proposal for a proposed e-sports arena at the site the University released. • Partnered with Texas A&M Athletics and other stakeholders on initiatives to enhance retail visibility and economic opportunities, including business recruitment and promotional efforts. • Engaged with a national retail consulting, market research, and development firm to execute recruitment strategies for vacant retail sites, especially in prime commercial corridors. 8.4 On Track Evaluate the utilization of impact fees that provide revenues to support infrastructure demands. • Residential impact fee collection rates were amended to provide for annual increases to water and roadway impact fees over a three-year period. • January 2024 • The first of three residential collection rate annual increases for water and roadway impact fees was implemented. • January 2025 • The second of three residential collection rate annual increases for water and roadway impact fees was implemented. • Semi-annual reports were presented to the Impact Fee Advisory Committee and City Council. 8.5 Achieved Evaluate and revise the Water/Sanitary Sewer Extension Policy. • The Water Services Department completed an evaluation of the policy and determined no changes were needed at this time. The policy will be reviewed in the future as conditions change. 8.6 On Track Conduct fiscal impact analyses. • Contracted with consultant to develop a Fiscal Impact Analysis Model in 2024. 8.7 On Track Continue the City’s Oversize Participation practice, where appropriate. • Approved two projects for funding in 2023 • Highpoint Apartments • Upon completion of the Highpoint Apartments, they were reimbursed their adopted funding for a waterline. • The Nova • Still under construction and will receive adopted funds once their sanitary sewer project is completed. 8.8 On Track Use available tools to strategically manage growth pressure in the ETJ. • Legislative actions influenced the City’s ability to regulate the extraterritorial jurisdiction. The City is pursing every avenue to protect its citizens through managed growth, while complying with state laws. The City is seeking further clarification of the City’s rights through the court system and is asking the legislature to provide greater clarity during the State’s 2025 Legislative Session. • The City Manager’s Office continued to be available for discussions on development agreements and municipal utility districts (MUDs) to manage growth pressure in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). 54 Page 378 of 414 COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS GOAL: Well-coordinated planning at all levels and effective engagement with local jurisdictions, institutions, and organizations to further realize the City’s vision and support the broad community. CHAPTER 9 55 Page 379 of 414 ACTION ITEMS STATUSES 9.1 On Track Reference the Comprehensive Plan actions within City master plans. • Each of the City’s 7 adopted master plans reference the Comprehensive Plan. • Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan dated January 2010. • Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces Master Plan dated July 2011. • Economic Development Master Plan dated May 2020. • The Water System Master Plan dated April 2017. • The Wastewater System Master Plan dated April 2017. • Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan dated September 2023. • Wellborn District Plan dated October 2023. • The Housing Action Plan dated September 2024. 9.2 On Track Reference the Comprehensive Plan and City master plans in Capital Improvements Planning, departmental work programs, and budgeting processes. • All annual service level budget submissions reference the Comprehensive Plan. 9.3 On Track Establish a university/City annual agenda. • Established quarterly meetings between City leadership and the TAMU president’s office. 9.4 On Track Gather growth expectations. • Evaluated the community’s existing conditions in 2024 in preparation for the 2025 Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Evaluation & Appraisal. • Continue to monitor data releases from Texas A&M University, Blinn College, and the U.S. Census Bureau. 9.5 On Track Formalize ongoing collaborations and establish a planning coordination task force with Texas A&M University and the City. • Provided feedback and recommendations to the University’s 2024 Capacity Study. • Collaborated with the University on projects including the Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan and the Hensel Park redevelopment. 56 Page 380 of 414 9.6 On Track Continue “good neighbor” initiatives with Texas A&M for permanent and temporary residents. • The Community Services Department engaged in the “Be a Good Neighbor” initiative and actively fostered strong relationships with Texas A&M faculty and students in numerous ways: • Met quarterly with Texas A&M faculty, including Greek Life, to discuss issues in the City involving Aggie students. • Participated in the National Night Out and Off Campus Student Services Luncheon • Code Enforcement Officers continued to participate in the Community Living Course which offers offending residents an opportunity to learn more about their community and “good neighbor” practices in place of punishment. • Worked with the Texas A&M Student Government and Student Affairs Department as they developed the Me + 3 initiative to foster better relations between long-term and short-term residents. • Partnered with community and student organizations in the development of the Proactive Rental Inspection program which seeks to improve the standard of living for students and other renters. Ultimately, this program was not implemented as it failed to be approved by City Council. • Presented to the City Council 10/24/2024, denied 4-3. • The University and Community Relations Office worked closely with the University on neighborhood relations, events, walk and talks, and more to engage in the “Be a Good Neighbor” initiative. • Met monthly with Off Campus Student Services Offices. • Partnered with the Off Campus Student Carnival programming • Partnered with Quarterly Community Luncheons programming • Met with neighborhood leaders and student leaders to discuss topics of interest and upcoming events. • Worked closely with staff in the newly formed President’s Office of Community Engagement at TAMU and with the government leadership. 9.7 On Track Contribute to a joint branding effort with Texas A&M University. • The Economic Development & Tourism Department engaged in strengthening the City’s connection with Texas A&M University through strategic branding and marketing initiatives. • Maintained existing collaborations with the university as the “Home of Texas A&M University,” and renewed a trademark agreement in summer 2022. • Enhanced the partnership between Visit College Station and Texas A&M Athletics as a destination for SEC fans through various marketing collateral. • Explored additional partnerships with Texas A&M Athletics to recognize local businesses and co- branded messaging with KAMU-TV to further develop the “Grow College Station” brand. • Launched a Small Business Sweepstakes to recognize local entrepreneurs and local businesses • Installed an “I Heart Aggieland” sign in front of City Hall which has become a destination for residents and visitors alike as a unique photo opportunity. • Enhanced the “Aggieland” moniker by making “I Heart Aggieland”-related merchandise available at the Visit College Station Visitor Center. • Maintained collaborative efforts with Texas A&M through the small business campaign, which resulted in the recognition of a local business as sponsor of a Texas A&M basketball game. • Hosted tailgate events prior to A&M football games and invited visiting fans, A&M officials, and the public. • Extended the sponsorship agreement with TAMU Ventures for an additional 3 years to continue to engage both digitally and in print to encourage visitor stays. 57 Page 381 of 414 • Participated in a local innovation summit which featured Texas A&M and its impact on the local area. • Visit College Station’s advisory committee met to discuss potential large upcoming events on the A&M campus. • Facilitated a media partnership with KAMU for Aggie Park’s Troubadour Festival and featured in the recognition of two signature summer events hosted at Kyle Field in 2024. • Coordinated with A&M athletics on the sharing of photo assets. • Launched a new website and visitor guide prominently highlighting A&M’s history, traditions, and impact as a tourism destination. • Planned an upcoming video series recognizing entrepreneurship in College Station. 9.8 On Track Expand tourism opportunities with Texas A&M University. • The Economic Development and Tourism Department engaged in multiple collaborative projects to expand tourism opportunities with the University. • Partnered with Texas A&M in July for the 2024 USATF National Junior Olympic Track & Field Championships, a national-level event which brought thousands of competitors and their families to College Station for the week-long experience. • In June 2024, Texas A&M hosted an international soccer match and George Strait concert, providing a significant tourism impact during a typically slower time in the calendar. • Worked with the Tourism Advisory Committee to create best practices for creating “Short Courses” with Texas A&M Professors to bring additional meetings to College Station during the week, a need area for overnight hotel stays. • Partnered with Texas A&M to create and fund the Brazos Valley Partnership Manager for Economic Development & Community Impact position, a role designed to improve access to the University for tourism functions. • Hired a Convention Sales Coordinator specifically focused on increasing group business originating at Texas A&M. 9.9 On Track Pursue partnerships with Texas A&M University regarding environmental stewardship. • Worked with the University on the Cooling College Station Plan. 9.10 On Track Convene coordination meetings with neighboring jurisdictions and regional planning organizations. • Held a joint meeting between City of Bryan Planning and Zoning Commission and the City of College Station Planning and Zoning Commission in 2024. • Discussed regional growth projections, development and housing pressures, and strategies each City is employing. 58 Page 382 of 414 9.11 On Track Pursue interlocal cooperation agreements. • Actively pursued and joined multiple interlocal agreements since 2019, strengthening regional collaboration and resource-sharing. These agreements facilitated improved coordination on infrastructure, public safety, transportation, and other municipal services, ensuring efficient and cost-effective service delivery. • Brazos Valley Council of Governments: • For the construction, acquisition, implementation operation and maintenance of the Brazos Valley Area Wide Communications System. • Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) • With Brazos County and City of Bryan: supporting local initiatives, technical assistance, training, personnel, equipment, supplies, contractual support, information technology, research and evaluation activities that will improve or enhance law enforcement programs. • Rock Prairie Management District No.2. • Memorandum of Understanding between TAMU and City of College Station for Psychological Evaluations of Police Officer Applicants. • Community Emergency Operations Center Agreement with City of Bryan • The United States Department Of Justice Federal Bureau Of Prisons Federal Prison Camp Bryan, Texas • Memorandum of Understanding for Fire & EMS Services • Northeast Trunk Line (NETL) Phase 4 Memorandum of Understanding • Adopted a revised EMS agreements with City of Bryan and Brazos County to move from automatic aid to mutual aid. 9.12 On Track Continue to coordinate with the College Station Independent School District and public charter schools. • Held a joint meeting between the City Council and the College Station Independent School District School Board in 2023 and 2024. • The City Manager’s Office has a representative on the College Station Independent School District’s bond committee. • The City Council added a strategic plan initiative to create a joint committee between the City and the College Station Independent School District in 2023. 59 Page 383 of 414 9.13 On Track Continue to participate in regional mobility initiatives. • Assisted the Bryan-College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in developing its next 25- year Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), which was adopted in December 2024 and includes future funding for several high priority corridors in Brazos County. • Collaborated with Brazos County regarding the design of Harvey Road (SH 30) widening and the Inner East Loop alignment study., Collaborated with TxDOT regarding State Highway 6, FM 2154 and other safety funded projects. • Collaborations with other regional partners included: • The Bryan-College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization • Brazos County • The Brazos Transit District • The City of Bryan • College Station Independent School District • The Texas Department of Transportation • The Brazos County Regional Mobility Authority • The Texas Department of Transportation • The Brazos Valley Council of Governments (BVCOG) • Texas A&M University 60 Page 384 of 414 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT REPORT 2025 Page 385 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Stakeholder Engagement Report summarizes community feedback collected during the City of College Station’s 2025 Five-Year Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal. From February through July 2025, over 500 touchpoints were captured through surveys, focus groups, open houses, public hearings, stakeholder interviews, and informal outreach events. Input was gathered from residents, community organizations, boards and commissions, City Council, and staff. Across all engagement formats, participants emphasized the need to expand affordable and diverse housing, improve public transportation and infrastructure, strengthen workforce development and economic opportunity, and protect neighborhood character while accommodating future growth. This report synthesizes those perspectives into actionable themes to guide updates to the Comprehensive Plan. INTRODUCTION The Five-Year Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal for the City of College Station serves as a vital checkpoint to ensure that the City’s long-range vision remains responsive to evolving community needs, implementation realities, and emerging challenges. As prescribed by the Comprehensive Plan, this process offers an opportunity to revisit foundational assumptions, assess progress, and identify refinements needed to guide policy, land use, infrastructure, and quality-of-life decisions moving forward. Community engagement served as the cornerstone of this effort. From February through July 2025, a broad cross-section of residents, businesses, nonprofits, appointed board and commission members, elected officials, and City staff participated in shaping the Plan’s direction. This report synthesizes those contributions into key themes to support meaningful, actionable updates. PUBLIC OUTREACH ACTIVITIES OVERVIEW The City’s Planning & Development Services Department, in coordination with Community Development, led an inclusive engagement campaign that also aligned with the 2025–2029 Housing Consolidated Plan process. Engagement activities included: • Community Planning Survey 2025 (135 responses) • Focus Groups – Medical, Housing, Workforce, and Business & Economy sectors • Public Meetings & Workshops – Seminar Supper, Open House, City Council public hearing • Informal Events – Three Food Truck Wednesdays • Digital & Media Outreach – Blog, radio, podcast, website, social media, and public notices Public Engagement Calendar DATE EVENT FOCUS 27-Feb-25 Medical Needs Focus Group Barriers to healthcare and service access 6-Mar-25 Business & Economy Focus Group Workforce development and economic resilience 20-Mar-25 Housing Focus Group Housing affordability, quality, and access 25-Mar-25 Seminar Supper Introduction to the planning process 8-Apr-25 Open House Public workshop on planning priorities and feedback Mar–Apr 2025 Food Truck Wednesdays (3 events)Informal outreach at community gathering spots Page 386 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |3 WHAT WE HEARD - COMBINED INPUT SYNTHESIS Across surveys, focus groups, interviews, board discussions, and staff meetings, several consistent themes and community concerns emerged. Public-facing outreach aligned closely with feedback from internal and institutional stakeholders. 1. AFFORDABLE AND DIVERSE HOUSING Participants across all engagement formats emphasized that housing affordability remains the most urgent and persistent challenge in College Station. Residents noted rising rents, aging housing stock, limited landlord participation in voucher programs, and barriers to entry for low- and moderate-income (LMI) renters. Frequent input included: • Interest in expanding rental and utility assistance programs • Concerns about substandard rental conditions and enforcement gaps • Desire for policy tools such as tax incentives to increase affordability • Support for accessible homeownership options and middle-income housing types 2. TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY Transportation was a consistent topic of concern. Residents, boards, and staff described the public transit system as limited, infrequent, and difficult to navigate. Others pointed to gaps in pedestrian safety and the need for better regional coordination. Common feedback themes: • Frustration with limited bus coverage and inconsistent service frequency • Safety concerns related to pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure • Interest in expanding micro-mobility planning efforts (e.g., scooters, bikes) • Requests for clearer communication about existing services and coordination with Brazos Transit and TAMU 3. STRATEGIC GROWTH & NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRITY Many stakeholders expressed concern about the pace and pattern of growth and its impact on neighborhood quality, infrastructure, resources, and housing stability. There was a shared interest in balancing new development with neighborhood preservation. Community members and officials frequently noted: • Many stakeholders emphasized the need for improved outreach and communication from the City to help residents and property owners better understand how land use policies translate into zoning decisions. • Stakeholder concerns regarding whether zoning decisions are being applied in a manner consistent with the Future Land Use Map and the Comprehensive Plan’s objective of preserving long-term neighborhood integrity. • The importance of transitional land use or buffering to reduce impacts • Concerns that City services and infrastructure is not keeping pace with population growth and new development 4. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & WORKFORCE READINESS Several focus groups and Council interviews discussed the need for a more visible and integrated approach to economic development within the Plan. Participants highlighted the absence of strategic planning and targeted initiatives for workforce development and local talent retention aligned with evolving industry demands. Page 387 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |4 Input included: • Recognition of workforce gaps, particularly for non-degree occupations • Discussion about small business retention and entrepreneurship • Calls for clearer articulation of economic development goals in the Plan • Interest in upskilling and job training for residents 5. SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE Concerns about climate resilience, water supply, and environmental sustainability came up across many engagement formats, especially among council and board members. Stakeholders discussed: • The need for long-term planning for stormwater and heat mitigation • Interest in low-impact development and green infrastructure practices • Opportunities to better integrate environmental goals into land use planning 6. PARKS, TRAILS, AND PUBLIC SPACESResidents and boards praised the existing park system while highlighting opportunities to improve equity, connectivity, and maintenance. Community feedback included: • A desire to expand trail systems and greenway connectivity • Requests for more shade, tree canopy, and natural area preservation • Interest in integrating parks with local businesses and active streetscapes • Concerns about park access and distribution in newly developing areas 7. PARTICIPATION AND COMMUNICATIONAccess to services and participation was a key theme in focus groups and community meetings. Some stakeholders expressed concern about how well public processes and city services reach historically underrepresented populations. Common concerns included: • Gaps in service delivery for seniors, non-English speakers, and low-income residents • Barriers to participation in planning processes • Desire for more multilingual, multi-platform outreach strategies • Calls to simplify zoning and development communication 8. IMPLEMENTATION AND ACCOUNTABILITYCity staff and elected officials noted challenges in tracking and implementing certain action items within the Plan. There was interest in making the Plan easier to manage, monitor, and align with budget and departmental operations. Input from staff and elected officials emphasized: • The need for clearer departmental roles and ownership of action items • Frustration with vague or overly broad language in the implementation matrix • Interest in improving the use of tracking tools like AchieveIt • Suggestions to link Comprehensive Plan implementation more directly to Council priorities and annual budget processes Page 388 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |5 GENERAL PUBLIC FEEDBACK Public input, gathered through surveys, events, and conversations, revealed several areas of consistent importance to residents. Participants voiced what they value, what they find challenging, and where they see an opportunity for improvement in the years ahead. COMMUNITY PRIORITIES IDENTIFIED Community members consistently emphasized the following issues as important to the future of College Station: • The need for more affordable and diverse housing options, including support for renters and prospective homebuyers • Concerns about public safety resources keeping pace with population growth • A desire for expanded job training, employment opportunities, and small business support • Interest in stronger and more reliable public transportation services • Calls for more parks, trails, and recreational amenities in growing and underserved neighborhoods • Ongoing attention to flooding, drainage, and environmental protection measures ONGOING COMMUNITY CHALLENGES Residents identified a range of challenges that they believe the City will need to address in the coming years: • Rising costs of living, especially in housing, transportation, and basic services • Pressure on established neighborhoods from student-focused or high-density development • Strain on infrastructure and public facilities as growth continues • Gaps in access to healthcare, childcare, and education, particularly among lower-income households COMMUNITY-IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES Despite these challenges, many participants expressed optimism about College Station’s future. They described ways the city could continue to grow while protecting its identity and improving quality of life for all.Frequently mentioned opportunities included: • Building stronger partnerships between City departments, schools, nonprofits, and employers • Creating more accessible pathways to education, job training, and employment • Revitalizing older neighborhoods in ways that promote equity and long-term stability • Using creative outreach methods to connect with residents and gather meaningful public input Many participants voiced a shared hope that College Station will continue to grow in a way that is thoughtful, all-encompassing, and sustainable, preserving the distinctive sense of place that makes it “feel like home.” LOCATION-BASED FEEDBACK FUTURE LAND USE Norton and Wellborn Rd., FM 2154A proposed change to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map from Neighborhood Commercial and Suburban Residential to Mixed Residential for approximately 20.7 acres generally located south of the intersection of Wellborn Page 389 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |6 Road and Norton Lane was made through the public engagement process. Mixed Residential is defined as areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including townhomes, duplexes, small multi-family buildings, and limited small-lot single family. Future Land Use (Neighborhood Commercial and Suburban Residential) Zoning (Rural) Business Center at Midtown DriveA proposed change to the Future Land Use and Character Map from Business Center to a Future Land Use compatible with Townhouse zoning (Urban Residential or Mixed Residential) for a portion of 313.73 acres of City property generally located east of Midtown Drive and north of William D. Fitch Parkway was made through the public engagement process. Urban Residential Page 390 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |7 is defined as areas appropriate for a range of high-density multifamily and attached residential development in various forms including townhomes, apartment buildings, mixed use buildings, and limited non-residential uses that are compatible with the surrounding area. Mixed Residential is defined as areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including townhomes, duplexes, small multi-family buildings, and limited small-lot single family. Future Land Use (Business Center and Natural & Open Areas) Zoning (Light Industrial) Page 391 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |8 THOROUGHFARE PLAN PEBBLE CREEK EXTENSION A proposed change to the Comprehensive Plan Thoroughfare Plan to remove the extension of Pebble Creek Parkway south from its current terminus at the intersection with St. Andrews Dr/ Royal Adelade Loop. Representatives from the Pebble Creek neighborhood expressed concern that this extension would negatively impact their quality of life, increase crime rates, devalue their homes, and potentially lead to the closure of the Pebble Creek Country Club. They are particularly concerned about the increased traffic, loss of green space, and the impact on pedestrians and golfers who use Pebble Creek Parkway. The representatives are seeking to have the thoroughfare extension removed from the plan. STAFF FEEBACK Throughout July 2025, the Long-Range Planning Division met with multiple City departments to gather staff reflections on implementation progress and coordination across the organization. Departments represented included those with responsibilities related to housing, development, engineering, infrastructure, capital planning, utilities, public safety, parks, and city management. Staff feedback focused on the practical realities of implementing the Plan and maintaining alignment with changing conditions, organizational shifts, and resource constraints. Common insights from staff included: • A recognition that many action items are broad, aspirational, or continuous in nature, making progress difficult to measure • The observation that some departmental assignments in the Plan no longer align with current workflows or organizational structure • Interest in incorporating phasing or prioritization to support budgeting and resource planning • The idea that the Comprehensive Plan could play a stronger role in shaping annual Council retreat priorities and long-range budget alignment • Noted limitations in the AchieveIt tracking system, which does not always align well with the Plan’s structure or allow for milestone-based progress tracking • A call for clearer timelines and implementation feasibility, particularly for items that may no longer be actionable or well-aligned with current priorities or resources. • The importance of refining or removing actions that are no longer feasible, ensuring that the Plan reflects what departments can reasonably implement over the planning horizon and organizational priorities. Staff emphasized that continued evaluation, coordination, and communication across departments will be essential for aligning implementation with both the Plan and real-world conditions. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS FEEDBACK Between April 3 and April 14, 2025, the Long-Range Planning Division facilitated focused discussions with several City boards and commissions to gather input for the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation. These discussions provided insight from appointees with expertise in land use, preservation, infrastructure, mobility, and parks and recreation. Participants reflected on both ongoing challenges and areas of opportunity based on their service and community engagement.Boards and commissions engaged included: Page 392 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |9 • Planning & Zoning Commission • Historic Preservation Committee • Parks & Recreation Advisory Board • Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board • Housing Plan Advisory Committee SHARED THEMES ACROSS BOARD DISCUSSIONS 1. Growth Pressures and Housing AffordabilityBoard members frequently discussed the impact of rapid growth on housing availability and affordability, especially for families and middle-income residents. Many noted that increased demand from student-oriented development is affecting the character and stability of existing neighborhoods. 2. Water and Environmental SustainabilityWater scarcity, urban heat, and long-term environmental resilience emerged as topics of concern, particularly in relation to park maintenance and future land use. Boards raised questions about how the Plan supports sustainability under increasing growth pressures. 3. Mobility and TransportationSeveral boards emphasized the need for safer and more connected pedestrian and bicycle networks. Micro-mobility, shaded routes, and regional coordination were also frequently discussed. 4. Parks and Green SpaceParticipants expressed strong appreciation for the City’s park system and described a desire to expand trail connectivity, prioritize maintenance, and strengthen the integration of green space into mixed-use and commercial areas. 5. Historic Preservation and Neighborhood CharacterThe Historic Preservation Committee and Planning & Zoning Commission raised concerns about the tension between redevelopment and preservation, particularly in older neighborhoods. Topics included accessory dwelling units (ADUs), parking, and the protection and importance of historic districts. 6. Public Engagement and TransparencyAcross all boards, participants reflected on the importance of predictable planning processes, transparency in land use decisions, and comprehensive outreach, particularly in the context of rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendments. BOARD-SPECIFIC HIGHLIGHTS BOARD KEY INPUT Planning & Zoning Commission Emphasized the need for transparency in the Future Land Use Map, concerns about drainage/flooding, and maintaining single-family neighborhood protections. Historic Preservation Committee Discussed housing affordability in older neighborhoods, university area pressures, and the importance of protection for historic districts. Page 393 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |10 Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Focused on water availability for parks, park-business integration, and greenway connectivity. Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board Highlighted traffic safety, shade and comfort for active mobility corridors, and coordination on survey efforts and planning tools. QUESTIONNAIRE THEMES FROM BOARD MEMBERS Following the discussions, board members also completed a written questionnaire. Their feedback reinforced the themes above and added the following: Common Priorities: • Preserving neighborhood integrity and encouraging compatible land use • Increasing affordable and diverse housing options • Improving pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and transit access • Supporting reinvestment in aging corridors and mixed-use redevelopment • Expanding and connecting trails, parks, and green infrastructure Common Concerns: • Many stakeholders emphasized the need for improved outreach and communication from the City to help residents and property owners better understand how land use policies translate into zoning decisions. • Stakeholder concerns regarding whether zoning decisions are being applied in a manner consistent with the Future Land Use Map and the Comprehensive Plan’s objective of preserving long-term neighborhood integrity. • Impacts of rapid growth on public services and infrastructure, particularly in new development areas • Difficulty accessing city services and participating in public processes due to gaps in public transit services and limited public communication methods Boards expressed strong support for a planning process that reflects community priorities, manages change predictably, and integrates environmental and social values. CITY COUNCIL INTERVIEWS As part of the Five-Year Comprehensive Plan Evaluation process, Planning staff conducted individual interviews with each member of the College Station City Council during July 2025. These conversations offered valuable insight into Councilmembers’ perspectives on the Plan’s effectiveness, evolving community needs, and opportunities for refinement. Councilmembers generally expressed support for the Comprehensive Plan’s goals and structure. Many viewed the Plan as a forward-looking document that reflects the City’s aspirations and helps guide long-term decisions. They also identified areas for clarification and expansion based on current conditions and emerging trends. KEY AREAS OF EMPHASIS 1. Economic DevelopmentAll Councilmembers discussed the importance of economic development and expressed interest in seeing it more prominently featured in the Comprehensive Plan. While the Plan references the Economic Development Master Plan, some felt that high-level Page 394 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |11 goals, such as talent development, business attraction, and workforce retention, should be more explicitly addressed. Several Councilmembers emphasized the growing need for jobs that do not require a four-year degree and highlighted the potential for College Station to retain more local talent. 2. Housing and Neighborhood ConservationAffordability, housing diversity, and neighborhood preservation were frequently mentioned. Councilmembers shared concerns about the effects of state legislation that removed local occupancy regulations and discussed alternative tools, such as overlay districts, land use buffers, or design standards, to help maintain neighborhood stability. There was strong interest in increasing options for workforce and middle-income housing without compromising neighborhood character. 3. Mobility and Micro-MobilityTransportation technology and shifting mobility preferences were key themes. Councilmembers spoke about the need to integrate micromobility options (such as e-scooters and bikes) into the City’s planning framework, particularly as regional transportation projects evolve, such as SH 6 and Union Pacific railway. There was a shared interest in ensuring College Station remains connected, multimodal, and accessible. 4. Growth Uncertainty and Demographic ChangeSeveral Councilmembers reflected on the unpredictability of future growth, especially considering TAMU’s planned enrollment cap and shifting population dynamics. A growing senior population, alumni returning to raise families, and changes in housing preference were all cited as factors that may shape long-term development trends. ADDITIONAL COUNCIL THEMES • Housing & Density Management – Focus on preserving neighborhood character while accommodating more housing types • Sustainability & Environment – Interest in urban heat mitigation, green infrastructure, and environmental design • Alternative Mobility – Support for reducing car dependence and expanding mobility choices • Redevelopment Areas – Continued attention to areas like Northgate and aging commercial corridors • Greenways & Trails – Support for enhanced trail connectivity and natural space preservation • Public Engagement – Appreciation for transparent processes and broad community participation Council input underscored the value of a flexible and adaptive Plan, one that balances predictability with responsiveness and reflects the community’s evolving aspirations and realities. CONCLUSION The insights gathered through this engagement process reflect a community that is thoughtful, invested, and forward-looking. Participants from all corners of College Station, residents, service providers, businesses, boards, Councilmembers, and staff, offered meaningful input rooted in lived experience and shared aspiration. While perspectives varied, common themes emerged around housing affordability, mobility, economic opportunity, and neighborhood preservation. This report does not offer conclusions or directives but instead provides a reflection of what was heard. These voices will inform the evaluation of current policies, help guide refinements to the Comprehensive Plan and ensure that future actions remain grounded in the needs and values of the community. Page 395 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |12 APPENDIX A: SURVEY COMMENTS WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER SUCCESSES IN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS? New city hall an amazing police and fire departments, great utilities; love the curbside recycling Sufficient parks, City hall project, police/fire/ems, Great trash, recyclable and bulk pick-up services The focusing and improvement of bicycle infrastructure Apart from our public safety services, nothing comes to mind. West corridor of Wellborn road and HW 47 development College Station seems to have forgotten how mature trees help appearance, land stability and air quality. New development should be required to save a percentage of trees. The resilience in coming back from the COVID shut down in terms of the local economy. Coordination with other local governments; successfully navigating economic development and retaining workforce through the pandemic; upgrading city facilities (city hall, police department, parks) I think the both the soccer game (Mexico vs. Brazil) and the George Strait concert were big wins for the city and I think there should be more of that! The development of new businesses such as restaurants and attractions. low crime rates Lowering crime; improving streets, improving traffic, flow, showing more concern over housing needs, improving activities and housing around Northgate, improving citizen participation, and showing more concern about the housing needs for all citizens., High level of city services, bond projects, new developments tree planting, app to report unsightly areas of city, great police and top notch city services Managing rapid development, and place-making New Development in the City Loads of commercial development. 2818 redesign is great. Greens Prairie Rd is also great. Additional multi-use paths are fantastic. City parks. Fun for All playground, Expansion of Veterans Park ball fields. Roadway improvements, Costco, Amazon Drones Bike network seems to be getting better. improving roads and utility infrastructure Maintaining Northgate as it is, Aggie Spirit, local events, partnerships with Bryan New developments happening around Northgate and century square area Land use Page 396 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |13 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER SUCCESSES IN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS? Communication and outreach have greatly ramped up. More focus on building for families. More community oriented development. Dog parks Teacher success will pave the path to city success. Densification of Northgate. Addition of more bicycle lanes and sidewalks Century Square, Pedestrian friendly infrastructure. Getting their tax money The city council members who listened to the community and voted down the development in Northgate 1. Continuing addition of safe shared use paths (Greens Prairie, Rock Prairie, etc.) ; 2. Offering opportunities for citizens to provide feedback on important paths forward; 3. Volunteers Maybe updating 2818. Bike paths, trails, sidewalks After football games traffic disbursement, development of businesses & restaurants further away from campus, keeping panhandlers out of area The City has excelled in providing excellent emergency services. I would love for civilian staff to be prioritized to support the growing forces behind fire and police. Willingness to include stakeholders in the use of city real estate Recruiting efforts Over the last five years the city has done an excellent job at addressing the shortages in the public safety sectors. New jobs New facilities to highlight the city The city has worked diligently to improve the image of the city and how it provides for its citizens. Construction of the barriers on George Bush Drive for bikes. These are critical to making people feel safe. Introduction of all ped phases on Univ Dr. AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR CITY EMPLOYEES AND MORE COMPETITIVE SALARIES police and fire responses Economic Development Town pride and safe place to live. Community/City activities Dedicating funds and resources to aging infrastructures Attracting businesses like REI to the city Page 397 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |14 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER SUCCESSES IN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS? Planning and Development interaction with public and help with permitting How the growth of the city has been handled growing and attracting many to the city. economic development Job growth, continued top tier reputation of TAMU, developments such as Century Square Century Square The city is clean and safe. Infrastructure reliable. South end of CS is growing and developing (tower point, jones crossing). Change in city leadership Trying to bring more Economic Development to College Station, and keeping impact fees low but still enough to help the city. More housing in Northgate. Also, increasing the cost-of-living adjustment for retirees. The Amazon drone program Parks Development; Community Image; Economic Development Affordable housing for middle class. Losing less jobs and businesses to Bryan. keeping the city looking beautiful and not degrading areas. Bringing people to College Station for tournaments/events Underground utilities, minimal overhead powerlines New PD, Fire Stations, City Hall Safe and friendly community due to proactive public servants and family-oriented community members. Recognition of value of community outdoor recreation The City of College Station is growing responsibly and taking the environment into consideration. More bike/ped facilities available The influx of businesses in College Station Traffic flow, physical infrastructure, and community image/appearance. Training Planning efforts; public safety Having more development in residential and commercial increasing public safety New city hall, new police department, Rock Prairie Road redevelopment Night life at Northgate growth and how the city handled it finally trying to address issues with Ag shacks with ROO and HOO zoning Page 398 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |15 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER SUCCESSES IN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS? Bringing new business for shopping and eating. economic development, community development Infrastructure MAINTAING PARKS AND WILDLIFE City building construction We might now have enough emergency personnel for the size of the community. City services are responsive to needs. getting the COLA raised for retire Has not regressed or taken any steps backward. WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER SHORTCOMINGS IN THE CITY OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS? Code enforcement in older neighborhoods not enough parks with natural hiking areas and greenspace (not SPORTS related) Medians/ Macy’s/ lack of coordination with rising school tax Coordinating school locations with busy roads so drop-off and pickup is efficient. The hesitancy to allow student housing in areas next to campus Pushing for road development east and developing a midtown area The city prioritizes A&M students over lifetime residents who own homes and businesses in College Station. Allowing a very small group of neighborhood activist eat up a large portion of staff time and resources in regards to the over occupancy issue. The government has no place in peoples bedrooms. Macy’s. Northgate. Development has gone astray here. Northgate is crowded and has lost its unique charm. Is it a downtown, is it student housing, is it an entertainment area? The city never should have purchased Macy’s. I do not believe we are incentivizing development to the maximum capacity that we can. I live in Midtown, an area that was promised x, y, and z for however many years and there is no movement on development. Additionally we need more housing. Lack of progress in Midtown, sports fields and indoor space. complete fiscal mismanagement No continuous planning. It seems the focus for development changes with each council resulting in incomplete development...see failed/stalled midtown. And no major new employment activity or major family entertainment venues for citizens & visitors. Not showing enough concern for the needs of the seniors, not investing in advertising in a way that will draw more seniors into the community, and not showing enough concern for the historical and lower income needs of several communities. few NON sports parks that have lots of green space, trees and nature walks Traffic Congestion navigation Increasing Impact and Park Fees Page 399 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |16 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER SHORTCOMINGS IN THE CITY OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS? Residential development and support for local and small builders. We still need more bike lanes. And we need lap pools for swimmers. Keep building multi-use paths! Lack of facilities south of Rock Prairie Losing Amazon Drones, Post Oak Mall not being redeveloped, the old apartments along Harvey Road (from Bush to SH 6) not being redeveloped I think the largest shortcoming has been the law that was passed limiting the amount of people that live together if they are not related. Not really feasible to do much by bus or bike unless it’s near the university. increased fees and regulations have hindered development opportunities and increased the cost of living and housing in College Station Affordable housing, traffic congestion, no shade, displacement, no good jobs outside of the university Trying to address increased traffic by fixing car traffic instead of promoting other transportation options Traffic, over crowding. Traffic design implementation lanes/light/etc. Being reactive in planning rather than proactive. We cannot expand roadways enough for all the traffic. We need to emphasize mass transit. Lack of dog parks Traffic School support. The city worries more about final finishes than K-12. Still need more bicycle lanes and sidewalks traffic is terrible and the police don't patrol streets for speeders. Barron rd. has a ton of speeders and there is a firehouse and HS nearby. People speed up and down the road at all hours of the night. Roadway Safety, congestion, Traffic mitigation, gamedays especially, flooding protection, prioritization of the university (the lifeblood of this city). Not enough expansion of infrastructure. Houses can’t sell here because of so many new builds. Cost of living too high. Just feel like Bryan has jumped way ahead of Cstat with the development of Legends and the area surrounding it Addressing housing accommodations in a timely manner that allow low income citizens and students to have affordable options while also insuring neighborhood integrity. Housing Increased taxes, Barron & Wellborn Rd. Hasn’t even started construction, affordable housing, paid parking, Growth and population exceeds infrastructure capacity Not allowing electricity options for population to choose from, undated parks for kids, code enforcement of neighborhoods (too many cars, weeds, campers/trailers parked in driveways, unkept property) Page 400 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |17 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER SHORTCOMINGS IN THE CITY OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS? Emergency services, traffic control, focusing on unimportant things like elaborate welcome signs, roads unmaintained. The list goes on Wasting money on the Macy’s building. Not performing proper soil testing for the Independence Ball Park Industrial development with tax rate growth. Affordable housing for low income families has absolutely tanked. Families cannot afford to live and there are not enough community resources. The city needs to offer a rental assistance program Bad investments Purchase of Mall property The city fails in making this a long term community to live in. We're behind communities such as Waco who have a bigger VA office for veterans, more museums, a water park, YMCA, even a zoo. The city could become less transient if it these were prioritized Lack of actual affordable housing, low income housing, senior housing, and decent paying jobs for lower income levels Traffic Fire department pay and retention The lack of housing for families that is affordable and not specifically designed for college students. Not having the emergency response departments keep up, numbers wise, with the extreme growth of the city and Texas A&M. Slow adoption of methods to keep peds safe. Also discontinuity of multimodal facilities such as when a bike lane abruptly ends at an intersection without transition to sidewalk or drivers not watching for peds especially with right turn on red Dealing with Macys disaster and paying more SALRIES, AND BEING UNABLE TO LIVE IN THE CITY YOU WORK wages, and road conditions Parking and cost of living Handling of sensitive topics - Northgate, Macy's, etc. Street and parking lot construction Being 5 more years behind other areas in adding athletic fields affordable housing Missing what looked like an opportunity to get Buc-ees within the city limits interdepartmental relations; planning for all the new construction around town Housing and traffic Focusing on the wrong things to work on. drainage and flooding Lack of beautification and walkability, especially within the core. CSPDs inability to confirm on College Station Municipal warrants. Lack of development on Harvey road and the mall. Lack or Northgate redevelopment Page 401 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |18 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER SHORTCOMINGS IN THE CITY OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS? The use of the budget with nothing to show for it. Specifically for parks and rec Mall looks to be floundering. Other malls within a 50 mile drive have better staples and small anchors. We have knock of shops and low end retail or eve resell shops in our mall. Makes it pretty easy to justify going out of town for shopping. Street repair, employee pay Traffic, Middle Age Entertainment, and Housing for low to moderate income citizens. It seems like there is only housing for students or citizens that make a higher income in College Station. The type of development in CS is making the town ugly. So many wooded areas are being developed but absolutely no trees are being left. It seems that the town could leave trees in surrounding areas or parking lot. purchase of Macy's building, ball park that was never finished, poor management of taxpayer dollars Not planning on more parking at City Hall The city looks more like a suburb of Houston than an independent city with attractive economic opportunity Development of the Northgate District CoCS is constantly losing business to the city of Bryan. Bryan is doing an outstanding job attracting new business, bringing in new families, and improving their reputation. very old water system that is always breaking Traffic flow is a major fail in certain areas. Some are very simple fixes that would not require construction and long traffic delays. Business development opportunities Neighborhood integrity, Traffic capacity, Affordable housing. Prioritization of automobile-centric transportation planning, over multi-modal resilient network I think a great many of our city residences are upset about the medians. Despite the fact they provide useful traffic control. housing prices Not enough things to do in the area Public safety turnover/compensation, recreational/entertainment opportunities for citizens and visitors that are NOT parks (we have plenty of those). Wages are not keeping up with economy Park maintenance and improvements Projects like the ballpark or Macys purchases that have cost millions in poor outcomes that could’ve been used in better ways planning for future growth Failed independence park. Macy's building closing and city purchase. Recreation spaces such as gym, sports centers the traffic needs to be better enforcement of no more than 4 unrelated Entertainment for Family and traffic congestion Page 402 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |19 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER SHORTCOMINGS IN THE CITY OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS? housing, local businesses have struggled to thrive community outreach WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE THE GREATEST CHALLENGE FACING THE CITY OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS? Traffic infrastructure neighborhood integrity and clean air Lack of tax income from business Funding Making sure housing supply keeps up with increasing population, while still making sure some level of quality is assured Population growing with HW 6 expansion. Keeping people happy during that transition all while keeping Aggieland a place for families to settle here and grow the town. The air quality, stability of soil and flooding issues that will come if the same type of development keeps happening. The availability and access to water. This will be a more pressing issue when out of county companies begin pumping water for the Austin area. In addition we need to find funding to drill new wells. Water. We like to say housing, jobs, public safety, etc. For this community, in the next five years (and beyond) it’s water. increasing the supply of housing to match the increase in population. Infrastructure to keep up with the population growth and affordable housing. the debt crisis caused by fiscal mismanagement over the past five years Inconsistent development budget Not showing enough concern around improving the economic development from I-6N down Texas Avenue, not doing more to bring in top quality, economic development businesses and manufacturing concerns Will hire paying jobs for better quality housing Housing, aging infrastructure, water water due to TAMU creation of semiconductor facility and the growing needs of city Water Security and wear and tear on infrastructure Traffic Increased costs of borrowing money and construction. The lack of incentives for residential developers. Lack of land and local resources. Traffic congestion, crowded student neighborhoods Water usage CSISD being an over-funded, bloated organization that makes people think CS overall has high property taxes Managing the growth of the city as Texas A&M’s student body grows. Page 403 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |20 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE THE GREATEST CHALLENGE FACING THE CITY OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS? Developing in a way that won’t destroy rural land and won’t encourage more driving on already busy roads. fulfilling the housing needs of the current and future residents Affordable housing Federal instability, non-automobile travel safety and comfort Traffic due to the new construction projects. Affordable housing Climate change. Storms Too much growth Trust in City government. Federal funding shortcomings. Political polarization congestion, overgrowth population growth Cost of living. Traffic-especially on highway 6 Traffic congestion, housing, insuring long term access to water from the aquifer where we currently draw water for the city.. Neighborhood integrity Hwy 6 Growth and population exceeds infrastructure capacity Increasing housing costs How to preserve the small town college town feel with growth of city Growth and lack of prioritizing important needs Competitive pay for employees, especially first responders. Finance for a growing community and workforce. Competitive pay. Traffic Economics The greatest challenge is going to be keeping up with the growing population. I feel like the city is already behind when it comes to providing services such as trash, police, fire, ems etc. which takes a toll on those employees Decent paying jobs and adequate housing for lower income levels income and seniors Traffic Public safety expansion to match city growth Page 404 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |21 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE THE GREATEST CHALLENGE FACING THE CITY OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS? Building the emergency services to a large size that will catch up with and keep growing with the city's growth. Managing the existing conditions of the city's infrastructure including current roads, utilities Traffic housing and city pay student traffic and highway 6 widening Keeping up with maintenance of streets infrastructure and continuing to provide high level of service as the city always has. Growth planning Traffic and street development efforts Funding to keep up with growing community and supply chain prices. affordable housing Growth outpacing city services. Specifically public safety. Continued growth within the city limits and the volume of construction that will accompany that growth Navigating the rapid growth and development of this city Housing and traffic Rapid growth drainage and flooding Traffic and congestion (although it is a breeze if you're from a big city), housing (inventory and costs), keeping new graduates in CS and the ability to recruit a strong qualified workforce to CS Wasteful spending, The city has a duty to be fiscally responsible with taxpayer money and that has not been done for years. Infrastructure and public safety issues combing with a growing population. Crime, cost of living, and housing prices Traffic congestion, finances changing due to legislation from Austin, student housing location and density. Keeping businesses from closing and/or leaving Traffic, Parking and Housing (Students have taken all the affordable housing) If so much destruction of greenery keeps happening, air quality, town appearance and flooding issues will continue to develop. Room for growth but the town is already big enough for me. Also keeping good employees due to pay and being able to hire people who will come to the office to work. Affordable housing, private sector jobs (lack of), attracting commercial/industrial businesses. Overgrowth of commuters that work in Houston or Conroe, but utilize local public resources Mitigation of traffic issues caused by population growth The massive city deficit. too many high rises north college station, too many people not enough. housing for non-students at reasonable price Traffic Page 405 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |22 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE THE GREATEST CHALLENGE FACING THE CITY OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS? Price of land Traffic Capacity and the major upcoming projects to address it. Attaining Public Safety employee numbers where they need to be. Maintaining city service standards while city and university rapidly grows and needs develop. Environmental protection, manifested in both compatible sustainable land usage, as well as natural resources, not limited to water, vegetation, and diversity of ecosystem Growth of A&M, influx of people moving here and the growth of concrete creating flood zones and heat islands. housing prices Entertainment Availability of reasonably priced housing for citizens of all socioeconomic statuses. Employees finances Housing; water Stagnation in development due to economic factors and developers who won’t build due to impact fees traffic congestion Roadway construction - Highway 6, Wellborn/George Bush Parks more growth student housing in neighborhoods Traffic on a major thorough fair Highway 6 is becoming so congested. Not to mention all the one way traffic in town. keeping up with the population growth infrastructure Figuring out what to do with Midtown or whatever that area is called over near Costco. Traffic & housing Growth & expansion with limited infrastructure and public safety coverage Keeping long-term residents happy when so much is out of their and the city's control, that is, things like growth, revenue generation, and ability to restrict occupancy. keeping up with public safety the streets Spurring economic development beyond housing WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE THE GREATEST OPPORTUNITY FACING THE CITY OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS? saving older neighborhoods Page 406 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |23 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE THE GREATEST OPPORTUNITY FACING THE CITY OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS? create excellent zoning and beautify the area with greenspace to enhance high end businesses to move here State mandates Planning as is being done here While other Texas cities seeing growth have things like urban highways forcing the design of growth, College Station's layout and streets is enough of a blank canvas to allow many types of developments It’s becoming more and more transparent that college station has potential to be coming more than just a college town. Being born and raised here I have seen the growth and am excited to see where CS’s expansion becomes. Big business potential=growing pop We have the opportunity to truly make this city beautiful and enjoyable. More priority should be placed on natural spaces and parks as well as the requirement of a percentage of tree to be left on new developed property. We are ideally located in the Texas Triangle and are home of the largest university in the US. We are uniquely positioned to attract large companies and industries. Securing water resources. Miss that opportunity and there won’t be a need for another five-year plan. There is a lot of opportunity in south college station to make this area more of a destination for full-time residents as well as students. The opportunity to enhance quality of life by leveraging the city's location to bring more businesses and amenities. The opportunity to address the debt crisis now, proactively instead of continuing the current path to compound the pain we'll feel dealing with the issue. Family and student entertainment...something budget and growth Improving quality control by bringing in venues for investment from A&M University and the City Of College Station Bringing in new businesses, more large scales events like George Strait beautify city and maintain sound zoning ordinances Sustainable Development Redevelopment of older areas that need new life Redevelopment zones. Zoning changes. Green commuting opportunities. Growth of the city Can Post Oak Mall, the Harvey Road corridor, and Wolf Pen Creek become an awesome mixed-use redevelopment area similar to Century Square, but bigger?! Bike network could be very good if progress continues. embracing the demand for housing due to the influx of people wanting to live in College Station Improving public transportation Targeted redevelopment areas and expanding bike network Page 407 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |24 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE THE GREATEST OPPORTUNITY FACING THE CITY OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS? The overall growth of the state. Affordable housing Climate change. More dog parks Opportunity for LOCALS to work for the city Building more student housing in NG and surrounding areas the integration of active transportation, compatible land uses accommodating the increasingly diverse group of people coming to this city for a&m Massive growth and the schools, infrastructure and pay do not match up. Please consider developing a sports/rec center for the city. Address traffic congestion by creating a safe and connected system for bicycles, pedestrians and micro-mobility users. Stray animals Lower the cost of living! Eliminate impact fees, don't allow paid parking on amy new developments, build your own roads and stop passing the buck to developers who pass the buck to the citizens. Young families moving in revitalizing the areas, chance to bring jobs and better education A reset to go back to the basics and focus on what matters and not nickel and dime its citizens Maintaining the infrastructure we currently have. Development of US made products and the need for more industrial growth. Design and development of University Drive expansion Tourism The city has a great opportunity to become a home for many more people if a different model would be followed. Understandably the city exists because A&M so that always needs to be a priority, but families need to be on the same level. New residents Regaining a spot as a destination city for public service workers The amount of people who have and are coming to College Station and the abilities that provides for the city as a whole. Since most roads are physically constrained at this point, shifting people out of their cars (onto micromobility) and providing ways to make bus service more reliable such as que bypass at traffic lights. CAPITALIZING ON HOUSING FOR PEOPLE THAT LIVE ANBD WORK HERE, NOT JUST THE STUDENT POPULATION city needs to bring in big retail to keep spending local Continued positive growth but can infrastructure accommodate it? Fiscal budget balancing Partnership with TAMU Page 408 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |25 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE THE GREATEST OPPORTUNITY FACING THE CITY OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS? Growing its employees constant growth Attracting industry that can provide quality jobs and services as more businesses move to Texas To get ahead of the next growth cycle and recruit/retain good quality people for key positions to prepare for these needs Expansion Rapid growth drainage and flooding, police force TAMU, planning projects such as this, Northgate, etc. Increase in population growth/tax base. Is the city going to adjust its priorities before it’s too late Attracting high-end employment and retail, we are growing fast and if we want to keep that money here we need retail activity. We have an opportunity to create high density housing (like NG) which provides relief for traffic in other areas of the city. Parks and Economic Development (opportunities for growth. The city should prioritize the environment and town history. Long term residents should be considered over temporary students. Hopefully the new Housing Plan will bring new ideas to allow for growth and more affordable housing. The freeze on TAMUs growth provides an opportunity to focus on the community members that live or work here year-round Community Image brings more residents and opportunity for development People want to live here, however, they are all being priced out of paradise. reduce the cost of living Being in a landmark university town, the possibilities are endless. Partnerships for economic development Need to build a Convention Center to increase tourism and business visitors. Updating Post Oak Mall area with businesses and infrastructure that supports tourism and economic growth. Reimagination of multi-modal transportation network as people-first recreational space of community connection, instead of auto-centric thoroughfare With our nature I feel we can make a huge impact by improving habitats in our parks/green spaces, extending residents incentives to have more natural yards, and look for ways for the community to help with policy creation. Opening more things for younger people to do since College Station has a lot of younger folks Planning and development of the land east of SH 6. Growth Economic development Page 409 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |26 WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE THE GREATEST OPPORTUNITY FACING THE CITY OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS? It is still a desirable place to live. Need to bring in more industrial to help with tax revenue potential to plan for future growth employment growth Economic Development redeveloping areas closest to campus for higher density becoming a more family friendly city - needing to develop amenities for families Family Friendly places. Having a plan and making a change. Houston area expansion Redevelopment of Northgate area. growth making the streets better Continued growth despite the city's efforts to not take advantage of it. We have great opportunities for development if the city will stop hindering it. DO YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS REGARDING THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF COLLEGE STATION? Quality of life should be a priority growth needs to be controlled unlike what happened to Houston during fast growth phases; developments where people can walk to amenities and meet neighbors We need industry/ large business Make a bus route that people would reasonably want to use over driving. Quality stops and, most importantly, dedicated bus lanes City Hall would greatly help the citizens by not approving more HOOs in older areas of town. This would make our older neighborhoods less attractive to Ag-shack developers, (hopefully) making neighborhoods more affordable for lower-income families. Try to land a few more large corporations in the next five years that bring stable jobs to the area. Tens of thousands live here and commute to Houston for job opportunities. East off of fitch is a great area for business park around flood zones. Please listen to the actual residents that are raising families and have a stake in this town. It seems that even when thousands sign petitions/attend council meetings it falls on deaf ears. If we can manage to attract large companies and industries, we will need additional workforce housing. Since we are no longer able to annex, we need to look into redevelop with particular attention paid to increasing density. We need more green spaces in the city, like Wolf Pen Creek Park. Page 410 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |27 DO YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS REGARDING THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF COLLEGE STATION? Drove to the FedEx office near Pebble Creek recently and I saw the trails, benches, and open spaces waiting for businesses and employees. This is a great area with housing and retail nearby. Has this been forgotten? Prioritize Midtown Focus on midtown, athletic fields for local and tournament use, housing, and infrastructure (highways, roads, hotels, etc.) Focus less on class warfare and pet projects like the narrowing of Lincoln Avenue and purchasing Macy's to let it sit empty. Instead, re-focus on the actual purpose of government: managing city services at the planning department and emergency services. City should stay out of real estate ventures...encourage private development North gate remains We need to spend more time getting more input from the wealthy residents to get their input on the growth of the area. Need more affordable options need to maintain neighborhood integrity with growing student population Growing more sustainably will provide college station with great benefits in the long run. College Station Should promote growth because it is coming to the area Can we share the Union Pacific right-of-way to build a commuter rail connecting all the housing centers from Wellborn (where we could even locate a park and ride) to A&M/Northgate and continuing on to Downtown Bryan? Cut congestion? An important part of managing the growing population is to allow for easier transportation. More sidewalks and accessible public transportation will be important. Focusing only on car-centric infrastructure will only make traffic worse, similar to Houston Parking minimums are an unnecessary burden on businesses. Sidewalks need more space away from the road if the speed limit is above 30 mph. be proactive in re-development opportunities I want more dense development that offers more things to do in a short distance. New development, especially around campus, should be intended to serve multiple modes of transportation. Also public health. Stop hiring from large cities and focus on teachers. Ban minimum parking requirements. Upzone near campus. Remove No More than 4 Please look at youth sports in the city. Our kids deserve a quality and safe place to play all recreational sports, especially basketball. Develop incentives for investing in sustainable practices, such as: 1. Better compensate for solar panel over production that rolls onto the city grid, a rebate program for water saving practices (i.e. rainwater recapture, low water need landscaping, etc.) Stay animals Build roads faster and stop waiting so long like you did with greens prairie road. Need to update elementary schools, offer incentives for first time homebuyers to work and live in cstat Page 411 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |28 DO YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS REGARDING THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF COLLEGE STATION? Development should be based on need (ex: more baseball fields) and not on pet projects or high costs wants (ex: a multimillion dollar rec center that will compete with private businesses). Its time we focal on building our tax base for both commercial and industrial business. A neighborhood community will not generate the tax revenue needed to support the city or community. Papadeaux This city needs more pretty green space. Perhaps even a man made lake with trails around it somewhere Concentrate on the services that support the continued growth fire/pd I appreciate what the city has done managing traffic congestion with the management center to use existing capacity better. I wish I felt safer on my bike. A painted gutter next to 35+ mph traffic is not safe despite its widespread use nationwide. Pay IT NEEDS TO SLOW DOWN AND FOCUS BACK ON THE PEOPLE THAT KEEP THE CITY RUNNING, TEACHERS, EMERGENY SERVICES, UTILITIES, SANITATION ETC Development from student living, high rises, new neighborhoods, ETC has blown up in the last 5 years so a little concerned it will be too much too fast for infrastructure to keep up. Cant wait to see all the comments and try to figure out which direction to go? Thanks There has always been a shortage of family-friendly businesses in the city because of it being a college town. As we continue to grow, I think there should be additional emphasis on attracting industry geared to our full-time population to create balance. Great work in changing the trajectory to a much more positive and interactive role Having a better plan for all the construction around town that's going on, some of the planning hasn't been thought out very well Growth is too fast and development too slow bring bigger businesses to College Station The city needs to look into more family friendly establishments instead of just recruiting bars and restaurants. As the population increases, public safety and utilities/infrastructure should the first priority. City needs better health insurance in order to keep retention. Too many coworkers are being denied needed surgeries Opportunities the City controls: for example, turning Macy's into something that turns the mall in a positive direction. Or the Patricia St. land which could enable high-density and retail needs of the city overall to be realized. No, I believe the City is doing what the can but only thing I might say is maybe looking at focusing on things for middle age. It feels like there are your seasoned individuals here and your students but where are the middle age individuals. Protect the history, protect some of the nature and protect permanent residents. The biggest obstacle to grown in the College Station is the City of College Station Stop focusing so much on catering to the university and tourism. Support small business ventures and bring in businesses that contribute to the global economy, not just the local hospitality Focus more on bringing in good, quality business that will attract newcomers. Focus less on multi-multimillion dollar fire stations and police stations and more on lowering cost of living for the middle class citizens. cost of living and very high appraisals pushing out all but the wealthy. Page 412 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |29 DO YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS REGARDING THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF COLLEGE STATION? Still need more "Family-oriented" things to do, but it is getting better. Retrofit and infill development, along with prudent resource conservation will make the city more prosperous and more resilient I love working for the City and I would like to let you know y'all are doing a wonderful job. I just think that we need new things for the people to do. College Station is a fast growing city and we need more things opening to compensate for that CS has experienced tremendous growth and development but is lacking in terms of public safety support, especially within the police department. Wages increase so employees can afford to live in city they work in More industrial I feel that we are 10 years behind the curve in planning for growth. After living and working in the area for the last 23 years, I could see in the early 2000s that the area was going to grow exponentially. Now we are like Austin playing catch up While we have more people moving here it doesn't appear we have an equal number of stores/restaurants. focusing on making this a place where families and seniors want to be - housing, amenities, job opportunities, etc. Families and seniors invest more in the community than college students PRESERVE THE WILDLIFE AND TREES AND STOP KILLING THEM I feel like the whole city lacks when it comes to traffic, roads, etc. We want people to move here & live here but we do not have the infrastructure to support all of these people. I become more concerned about the availability of water with each high rise and neighborhood that goes in. Page 413 of 414 FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGAGEMENT REPORT |30 Page 414 of 414