HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/25/2009 - Regular Agenda Packet - Design Review BoardAGENDA
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Friday, September 25, 2009, 11:00 AM
Administrative Conference Room
College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas, 77840
1. Call to Order
2. Consideration, discussion and possible action on Absence Request.
• John Nichols - August 28, 2009
• Ward Wells - August 28, 2009
3. Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting Minutes.
• July 24, 2009
• August 14, 2009
• August 28, 2009
4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a change to the freestanding sign at The
Arctic Wolf Ice Center located at 400 Holleman Drive East which is within the Wolf Pen
Creek District. Case# 09-00500177 (MH)
5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a waiver request to Section 5.6.B.6 of
the Unified Development Ordinance relating to off-street parking for a proposed multi-
family development located at 401, 403, and 405 Second Street, next to Traditions
Apartments. Case #09-00500171 (LH)
6. Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A Design Review Board Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent
meeting.
7. Adjourn.
Consultation with Attornev (Gov't Code Section 551.071; possible action.
The Design Review Board may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and
contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive
session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client
privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Design Review Board
meeting, an executive session will be held.
Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Board of the City
of College Station, Texas will be held on the Friday, September 25, 2009 at 11:00 a.m.
at the City Hall Administrative Conference Room, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station,
Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda
Posted this the day of , 2009 at p.m.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
By
Connie Hooks, City Secretary
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said
Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at
City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website,
www.cstx.aov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at
all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on , 2009 and remained so
posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said
meeting.
This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station
City Hall on the following date and time: by
Dated this day of , 2009.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
By
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of 12009.
Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas
My commission expires:
This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any
request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To
make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be
viewed on www.cstx.aov.
(*tl""
f'f:irar. r!r:, J)",
s11,11menl '~,Yvicu
Minutes
Design Review Board
Friday, July 24, 2009
Administrative Conference Room
1101 Texas Avenue
11:00 AM
Board Members Present: Chairman John Nichols, Ward Wells, Hunter Goodwin, Alan
King, Jason Kinnard, and Katy Jackson
Staff Present: Assistant Director of Planning and Development Services
Lance Simms, Staff Planner Lauren Hovde, Staff Planner
Matthew Hilgemeier, and Staff Assistant Nicole Padilla
Others Present: Jane Kee and Tom Herbelin
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order.
Chairman Nichols called the meeting to order at 11:03 a.m.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consider Absence request
John Nichols - June 5, 2009
Hunter Goodwin - June 5, 2009
Alan King motioned to approve the absence requests. Ward Wells seconded the motion;
which passed unopposed (4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Possible action and discussion to approve meeting minutes
for May 8, 2009, May 22, 2009, and June 5, 2009.
Hunter Goodwin motioned to approve the meeting minutes for May 8, 2009, and May 22,
2009. The motion was seconded by Katy Jackson and passed (6-0). Alan King motioned to
approve the meeting minutes for June 5, 2009. The motion was seconded by Ward Wells and
passed (4-0).
3
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a
waiver request to Section 5.6.B.6 of the Unified Development Ordinance relating to off-
street parking for a proposed multi-family development located at 401, 403, and 405
Second Street. Case #09-00500144 (LH)
Lauren Hovde, Staff Planner, presented the request that the Applicant would like to reduce
the number of parking spaces by 8% to allow for 35 spaces instead of the required minimum
of 38 spaces.
Tom Herbelin, developer of the property, briefly explained that the planned use of the
property is a small apartment complex consisting of 33 one-bedroom units. He further
explained that each tenant will receive one assigned parking space and all others will have to
park in the city garage.
Staff Planner Hovde, then answered questions in general from the Board Members.
Jason Kinnard motioned to approve the waiver request to allow for 35 spaces instead of the
required minimum of 38 spaces. The motion was seconded by Hunter Goodwin and passed
(6-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A
Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing
policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject
on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
None
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Adjourn
Hunter Goodwin motioned for adjournment. Ward Wells seconded the motion; which passed
(6-0).
Meeting adjourned at 11:26 a.m.
APPROVED:
John Nichols, Chairman
4
ATTEST:
Nicole Padilla, Staff Assistant
(*tl""
Crry ()F Col.[.[.{, f -E T-ION
f'f:irau r!r:, J)",
s11,11menl '~,Yvicu
Minutes
Design Review Board
Friday, August 14, 2009
Administrative Conference Room
1101 Texas Avenue
11:00 AM
Board Members Present: Chairman John Nichols, Ward Wells, Hunter Goodwin, Alan
King, Jason Kinnard, and Katy Jackson
Staff Present: Senior Staff Planner Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner Lauren
Hovde, Staff Planner Matthew Hilgemeier, Senior Parks
Planner Pete Vanecek, and Staff Assistants Nicole Padilla and
Beth Boerboom
Others Present: None
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order.
Chairman Nichols called the meeting to order at 11:06 a.m.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a
variance request to Section 7.9.B.1 "Required Screening" of the Unified Development
Ordinance to allow an alternative screening method for the mechanical equipment at
the Adamson Lagoon Bath House located at 1900 Anderson Street within Bee Creek
Park. Case #09-00500157 (LH)
Lauren Hovde, Staff Planner, presented a variance request to allow an alternative screening
method for mechanical equipment located on the roof of the Adamson Lagoon Bath House.
She further explained that the Applicant is requesting to paint the mechanical equipment
rather than screen it.
Chairman Nichols commented that the ordinance needs more specific language if the Design
Review Board is to be reviewing more items similar in nature in the future.
6
There was general discussion regarding the type of paint needed, the colors proposed, and
that other screening options may draw more attention.
Alan King motioned to approve the submittal to paint the visible mechanical equipment in
the color of Almond (Kynar 500) or as close to Almond as possible. Ward Wells seconded
the motion and added a request that staff review the procedures to determine if these
problems can be addressed earlier in the approval process.
Hunter Goodwin asked that staff provide recommendations on all items.
The motion failed due to a lack of vote.
Hunter Goodwin motioned to approve the rooftop mechanical equipment as-is without any
alterations required. The motion was seconded by Katy Jackson.
Chairman Nichols added that the motion is made in the context that there are other metallic
elements in design that provide a basis for the approval.
Motion passed (6-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a
change to the freestanding sign at The Arctic Wolf Ice Center located at 400 Holleman
Drive East which is within the Wolf Pen Creek District. Case #09-00500154 (MH)
Matthew Hilgemeier, Staff Planner, presented the request to add an aluminum sign to an
existing freestanding sign located at 400 Holleman Drive East. He then answered questions
in general from the Board Members.
Ward Wells motioned to deny the request to add an aluminum sign to the existing
freestanding sign based on looks and continuity. Alan King seconded the motion; motion
passed (6-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A
Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing
policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject
on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Chairman Nichols requested that the revision to Section 7.9.B. I of the Unified Development
Ordinance "Required Screening" be brought to the Design Review Board before it is
presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Adjourn
Alan King motioned for adjournment. Hunter Goodwin seconded the motion; which passed
(6-0).
Meeting adjourned at 11:55 a.m.
APPROVED:
John Nichols, Chairman
ATTEST:
Nicole Padilla, Staff Assistant
(*tl""
f'f:irar. r!r:, J)",
s11,11menl '~,Yvicu
Minutes
Design Review Board
Friday, August 28, 2009
Council Chambers
1101 Texas Avenue
11:00 AM
Board Members Present: Acting Chairman Alan King, Hunter Goodwin, Jason Kinnard,
and Katy Jackson
Staff Present: Senior Planner Jennifer Prochazka and Staff Assistant Beth
Boerboom
Others Present: Switzer Deason
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order.
Acting Chairman King called the meeting to order at 11:14 a.m.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a
Gateway Grant proposal for the University Preserve Subdivision located at the
intersection of Lyceum Court and Munson Avenue. Case #09-00500162 (JP)
Jennifer Prochazka, Senior Planner, presented the item stating that the applicant has proposed
to replace the landscaping and irrigation system at the entrance to the University Preserve
subdivision and re-stain approximately 100 feet of wooden fencing along both sides of the
entryway. The improvements will begin at the Munson Avenue right-of-way and will extend
along the private right-of-way, Lyceum Court.
Senior Planner Prochazka reviewed the rest of the staff report and answered questions in
general from the Board Members.
Mr. Switzer Deason, the applicant, provided an aerial photo and several photos of the
proposed landscaping materials.
Katy Jackson motioned to approve the Gateway Grant proposal. The motion was seconded
by Jason Kinnard and passed (4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A
Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing
policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject
on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
None
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Adjourn
Hunter Goodwin motioned for adjournment. Jason Kinnard seconded the motion; which
passed (4-0).
Meeting adjourned at 11:28 a.m.
APPROVED:
John Nichols, Chairman
ATTEST:
Nicole Padilla, Staff Assistant
10
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
WOLF PEN CREEK DESIGN DISTRICT
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Matthew Hilgemeier, Staff Planner Report Date: September 16, 2009
E-mail: mhilgemeier(o-)cstx.gov Meeting Date: September 25, 2009
For
ARCTIC WOLF ICE CENTER - SIGN REVIEW (09-00500177)
Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a change to the freestanding
sign at The Arctic Wolf Ice Center located at 400 Holleman Drive East, which is within
the Wolf Pen Creek District.
Location: 400 Holleman Drive East
Applicant: Fast Signs
Item Summary: The applicant is requesting to add an aluminum sign to the existing
freestanding sign located at 400 Holleman Drive East (The Arctic Wolf Ice Center). The
current freestanding sign structure measures 87.5 square feet, and has 58 square feet
of visible signage. The property is allowed to have a freestanding sign which measures
275 square feet in size. The aluminum sign would be placed below the existing
electronic reader board and would not change the actual size of the structure.
The applicant has proposed two sign options for the Board to consider; the applicants
preferred option is Option #1. (graphics attached)
Option # 1 would add a 6.5 square foot aluminum sign to the existing
freestanding structure.
Option # 2 would add a 10 square foot aluminum sign to the existing
freestanding structure.
The addition of either of the proposed aluminum signs would not change the physical
size of the sign structure. However, the amount of visible signage would be increase to
64.5 square feet if Option #1 is approved or to 68 square feet if Option #2 were
approved.
Color and material samples will be provided at the meeting.
Item Background: In March of 2005, the Design Review Board (DRB) approved a
freestanding sign approximately 11 feet tall for this property. The top portion of the sign
contains one internally illuminated sign with an aluminum cabinet and the bottom portion
of the sign contains an electronic reader board.
On August 14, 2009, the DRB denied the applicant's request to add an aluminum sign
to the existing freestanding sign due to scale and design of the proposed sign not being
proportionate and harmonious to the design of the existing structure.
11
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the applicants request to add
additional signage to the existing freestanding sign. The proposed addition complies
with the freestanding sign regulations of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Issues/Items for Review: Section 5.6.A.11 states that commercial signs for
businesses in the Wolf Pen Creek District must meet the following criteria:
• Every sign shall be designed as an integral architectural element of the building
and site to which is principally relates.
• Every sign shall have good scale and proportion in its design and in its visual
relationship to buildings and surroundings.
• The colors, materials, and lighting of every sign shall be restrained and
harmonious with the building and site to which it principally relates.
• The number of graphic elements on a sign shall be held to the minimum needed
to convey the sign's major message and shall be composed in proportion to the
area of the sign face.
• Each sign shall be compatible with signs on adjoining premises and shall not
compete for attention.
Photos of existing signage in the surrounding area, as well as copies of the approved
site plan and building elevations will be provided at the meeting for the Board to
determine whether the above criteria have been met.
Attachments:
1. Aerial Map
2. Application
3. Sign Options
12
C-4y~N
k O~
I-
OF
li
i
r +
Y
1
,
o
•r.
~
M1
f
"q,
13
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO. f
DATE SUBMITTED
WOLF PEN CREEK
BUILDING & 1 REVIEW APPLICATION
Design Review Board
Date of Preapplication /Conference:
NAME OF BUSINESS
ADDRESS 0 VIA 0,/v\
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY I CO-
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY
APPLICANT'S INFORMATION:
Name F A-5-1 ~ 6_; 4
Street Address
City ~\r2<{
E-Mail Address
Phone Number
U K , J R-.i a q
~ 1Gw
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Zip Code
Fax Number s T q- q__4 47
= TtCr I o',
Street Address O EA 0U(J-_ /Vt f i0
City C0t.LC-~-r1C O/U State 7-& YA Zip Code 7 -I4 C
E-Mail Address i3 j-T b
Phone Number - Mtn - ~ ~ - :3170 Fax Number -?c°'
Page 1 of 2
C
14
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXTERIOR CHANGES
C) 4c"- A - ~ W' .A ~ 6 e, - via/✓
AND/OR
I ATTACHED SIGN 77 ❑ FREESTANDING SIGN
Square Footage 6)22 " 1 d Square Footage - 6 }
All Wolf Pen Creek applications must be reviewed by the Design Review Board. Once a meeting is scheduled,
the applicant will be notified of the date and time so that he can be present to discuss the proposal with the
Board. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits
attached hereto are true and correct.
Signature of Owner, Agent or Applicant
Page 2 of 2
Date
15
OPTION #1
87
16
cur„~, y ,
zuhll~~'1sss4 ,«N6.2
87"
OPTION #2
17
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
NORTHGATE DISTRICT
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Lauren Hovde, Staff Planner Report Date: September 16, 2009
Email: Ihovde(o-)cstx.gov Meeting Date: September 25, 2009
For
401, 403,405 SECOND STREET PARKING WAIVER (09-00500144)
Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a waiver request to Section
5.6.B.6 of the Unified Development Ordinance relating to off-street parking for a
proposed multi-family development located at 401, 403, and 405 Second Street in
Northgate.
Zoning District: NG-3 Residential Northgate
Location: 401, 403, 405 Second Street, located at the corner of Second and Cherry
Streets, next to Traditions Apartments
Applicant: Jane Kee, IPS Group
Item Summary: The applicant is seeking a waiver to Section 5.6.B.6.c of the Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO) Off-Street Parking Standards which states: "Off-street
parking facilities for residential uses shall meet 75% of the number of specified parking
space requirements of Section 7.2.H Number of Off-Street Parking Spacing Required."
Section 7.2.H requires a total of 50 parking spaces for 33 one-bedroom units in a multi-
family development. Since the UDO allows multi-family developments in Northgate to
provide 75% of the number of parking spaces required in Section 7.2.H, the proposed
development is required to provide a minimum of 38 spaces.
The applicant is requesting a 10% reduction resulting in the construction of 34 spaces,
which is one space per dwelling unit and an additional space for an office worker.
Section 5.6.B.14.m gives the Design Review Board (DRB) authority to approve a
reduction in parking for residential uses if a parking study supports the reduction based
on reasonable assumptions of parking availability. The applicant has applied for this
reduction on the basis that the multi-family development parking will be restricted to
resident use only. Though visitor parking would not be allowed, it does not take into
account that there may be more than one resident in a unit with a need to park. This
development, which contains 33 one-bedroom units and an apartment office, may be
sufficiently served by this parking area, but the reduction will virtually eliminate the
possibility for multiple residents of a one-bedroom unit to each park a vehicle, or the
possibility for visitors to park on site. There will also be no additional parking for
maintenance personnel.
Design Review Board
September 25, 2009
Page 1 of 3
18
Item Background: At this time, there has not been a formal site plan submittal. All
discussions that have taken place have been in regards to preliminary drawings.
Therefore, there has not been a review of this site to ensure that all other Northgate
ordinances are being met. Due to the major impact the Board's decision will have on
the design of this site, the applicant requested that they be allowed to make the request
prior to solidifying their proposal. As the applicant stated in their application, the need
for a parking reduction was caused from the dumpster being located at the rear of the
building which is a Northgate requirement. Considering the applicant's design, either a
variance to the dumpster location would need to be sought that would allow them to
place the facility closer to Second Street or a parking waiver would need to be sought to
reduce the number of parking to accommodate the setback dumpster location.
An 8% parking reduction was approved for this project during the July 24, 2009 DRB
meeting resulting in a required 35 parking spaces. At that time, the applicant was
recently aware that a driveway throat extension would eliminate an additional parking
space. However, Section 5.6.B.14.m, which allows for DRB to consider parking
reductions in Northgate, prohibits the Board from approving a waiver less than what is
requested in the parking study submitted by the applicant. Therefore, a 10% reduction
resulting in 34 spaces could not be considered at that time.
Recommendation: The applicant wishes to minimally serve the proposed
development with a surface parking lot containing 34 spaces. While this concerns Staff,
we believe it would be better to reduce the number of available parking spaces by four
for this design rather than move the dumpsters closer to Second Street, which is meant
to be a pedestrian corridor. Staff recommends approval of the requested parking waiver
for the proposed multi-family development at 401, 403, and 405 Second Street.
Issues/Items for Review:
1. Parking waiver. Section 5.6.B.14.m gives the Design Review Board authority to
approve a reduction in parking for residential uses if a parking study supports the
reduction based on reasonable assumptions of parking availability.
Supporting Materials:
1. Aerial
2. Application and Parking Study
3. Copy of site plan
Design Review Board
September 25, 2009
Page 2 of 3
19
r
1-41 ht `'F
K
Z mow`-s
Design Review Board
September 25, 2009
20
Page 3 of 3
(*tr
~•~.•u1~mk•~:`~~rn~r•.+5~a.•.~a t.•rp~~r:
FOR OFFICE USE ONI V
SATE SU6WTM f•L'~5.
D IGM RME ' BOARD
'PEAL i WAIVERS APPLICATION
hilMrAl tlM SUOMITTAL RMIJIREMEHT~:
5 0 Application Fee
Application nornpletrd in f uIl-
Additional materials may be required of tho apqAioant such as 4a plans, alevation
drawings, sign details and floor plans. Tho Zoning Ofrciol shall inVrn tho applic:arA of
any fndra matf-.riais required.
Dad: Of Piw-~applic:atlon Corifefflnco- Mamh 13, 2009
APPLICAPd (PROJECT MANAGER' INFORMATION (11dnary Contact for the Project):
Name: Jane Koo, vS Group
Strut Address; 511 Univemity Ur. East Sulto 205, College tativn. 7 77540
F-,-Mail Addrass; javie@jpsgmup.us
Phone kumbar: 846-9269 Fax Number: 260-3564
PROPERTY OWNER & DEVELOPER wonMATION;
Now: Tom Herbolin IM Wwtgroaa. Suite 100, Addison, JX 75001
E-Mal Ad f$$; t:vr~F{=!r
Phone Number: 21A-265-8$85 ext. 116 214-8024R22 cell
LOCATION F PROPS dM
Address: 401-405,405 Sewnd Stmt
Lot Rlnck 3udd[vision: Lots 5, 5,7,8,131ock 20, Royett
CURRENT NING.OF 5UOJECT PRORERTY NG3
APHALMAIVER REQUFSTU)- (Circle One)
Northgate requirements pa ing.
A1) licablo Ordinance Ssetlow 5.8.0
21
Exp4nation of weivvdvegWA:
Aa you will recall, previously there were 3 decisions the spplioantwas awaiting filoin the City in
c4er fie proceed with site design. One involved dur7rpster IvQation, one throat depth and one
rArking. Each of the 3 ware critical to moving frmuard and each was a cted by the other MO.
Each had to considered by dillerent p8rts of the nlty organization, durnpster - planrurlg, thruai
depth , eNineering aril parking DRIC.
At the time of DR13"a prevloua corrnideradon, the 6ppkpP$1 just found that the throat depth
requirement would be 2d', At that tune we felt thal vve would not be able to provide the Wth
space 4Wt wantiad to disniss the site with Mslnae we were there. M you recall, the Board
could not r onslder this addhional space because staff hW not Wd $rne to irview this.
SInoe that DRU meeting, where the vMerwas granted to reduce the paNng requirement to 36
spaces. the archiW has worked to try to cariHqufe s my to gain 35 spaces but has bean
unabia to with thb 1~dand avid throat depth requiromenta. The proposed 34 spawt will
s mmodate one for each unit[ and one space r a manger.
GENERAL APPEALSMAIVER REQUEST
The folkwiling speeifiv vaiiie on from the Ordinance is requestod:
Reduce raquirori parldN from 3€1(ruaMed iap fforn 37.1 25) to 34 spaces for a multi-family
developmrrt In Norfhgate (110% reduction).
The unoecasmary hardship (s) involved by r etlno the proviislone of the orollnancs other
than fdrrarrclal hardsNp Wa3r&:
the UDO Irrtentlon to implement the Northgate Plan calla for redeveloping properties into higher
residential den4es.
The followlrag asltematNes to the requested variance are po5slible,
It Is physionily impossible to provide one more space without either elirnlAnWR end islandu,
eliminating a unit or moving the dumpctero closer to Second St. This is contrary to the Whgate
Dealgri guidelines which attempt tv locate durnpster faailabies as far frarn the ro;;tway as
pousible to Mid( vi6ibil lty.
The appllcarif has prepared thin app ketion and cedities AN the fads ~2sted hereirr and exhibits
attached hereto are lure, correct andoomplete.
s-
+f ~ + I
Oigna rii-'9 and :Fife J{ Date
22
Wow err Oe origLhal a x4ica6up infonyo fort
This is a amaY velopn ont h ~J olticOnoy units in thq propoW fpNw. Fach unit is
approxhr to 390 W and is d"* nod hr ojo )ndividval. I he devofopment Is footed in a
tsxgeiY ~~d€;strfer~ a~ee sr~d tt~ ~~ririrr~ ~~~e~ i~ ivr r~sid~r~t~ only. lf~ ~aafo~er fs
proposing to have an across grato that W Sow resfdvN oo to MarN pafmng area, if Me
City aitows a r{rduer thmal dopth for Iho ga~o. Evon withoul tha gala, ttie parldrny area NNW be
s~rredforr ra.9idef its only.
TNs redo a in partrfrjg atom the dtrrnpster to movod fhlther to the rear of the buildings fn
~ PPWR with the N hgato rogoatims acid OQWZ Properpfa m of tho oleo 401
trarr'+brmar CM Me Sh.
Pw praprrsad 36 spaces fnthe psrkOg darnRnd r this paftlar afevetpmont which ~
designed for 31 msYerr#s. ri wUf bo rm vi t perfc y aNo d yOUlip the parfrirq W N. Tho
fnteot is to protest the pglMng area far resf rrfs otify. Pr MifV 35 sp€ s rather thn 38 a4l
We no impact on Me surmunding area, however as there ig pafknq Alai adjacent
rog&O l sheets and ii? the par6ig garage nearby,
23