HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/23/2003 - Regular Agenda Packet - Design Review Board Agenda
• College Station Design Review Board
Friday, January 23, 2003
City Hall Training Room
College Station 1101 Texas Avenue
Embracing the Past,Exploring the Future 11:00 a.m.
1. Call to order.
2. Consider absence requests.
3. Discussion, consideration and possible action to approve meeting minutes
from January 9, 2004.
4. Discussion, consideration and possible action on building design, final site
plan, final landscape plan and design elements for Wolf Pen Ice Rink at 400
Holleman Drive East in Wolf Pen Creek. (03-316 LH/JP).
5. Discussion, consideration and possible action on a proposed sidewalk for
Wesley Foundation-Methodist Student Center in Northgate. (04-09 JP).
6. Discussion and consideration of future agenda items.
7. Adjourn.
The building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are
available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made 48 hours
before the meeting. To make arrangements call
(979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989.
Minutes
40 Design Review Board
January 9, 2004
11:00 AM
Board Members Present: Scott Shafer, Stanton Ware, Alan King,
Bill Trainor& Richard Benning.
Board Members Absent: Dr. Phil Tabb& George McLean.
Staff Present: Staff Assistant Deborah Grace, Staff Planner Jennifer
Prochazka, Planning Intern Lauren Harrell, Development
Manager Natalie Ruiz, Director of Economic Development
Kim Foutz.
Others Present: David Slattery, Bill Mather, Chad Grauke, Ray Thomas,
Andrew Berry, Joaquin Jaramillo &Veronica Morgan
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 Mr. Shafer called the meeting to order.
• AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consider absence requests.
George McLean
Dr. Phil Tabb
Mr. Trainor made the motion to approve both absence requests. Mr. Benning
seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Discussion, consideration and possible action to approve
meeting minutes from November 14,2003.
Mr. King made the motion to approve the minutes. Mr. Trainor seconded the motion,
which passed unopposed(5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Discussion, consideration and possible action on site,
sign and fagade changes for Gatsby's at 111 College Main in Northgate.
Planning Intern Lauren Harrell presented the staff report and told the Board that the
applicant is proposing a rehabilitation of the former Aggie Cleaners to serve as a
nightclub. The rehabilitation will require minimal changes to the exterior of the building
and the addition of signage to both the front and rear facades.
•
They also want to reconstruct the rear awning to accommodate out door seating for the
• new nightclub.
The sign as proposed will exceed the allowable area by 10.5 square feet.
Mr. Trainor made the motion to approve the proposed changes and allow the extra
10.5 square feet of signage. Mr. Benning seconded the motion, which passed
unopposed(5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Discussion, consideration and possible action on the site
improvements for Wolf Pen Ice Rink at 400 Holleman Drive East in Wolf Pen
Creek.
Planning Intern Lauren Harrell presented the staff report and told the Board that the
applicant is proposing to construct a 45,000 square foot ice rink facility. Because of time
limitation, the applicant will approach the Board again with other design elements. The
site plan and building design must meet the requirements of the UDO as well as the non-
residential architectural standards within the UDO. Right now the south and north
elevations are not meeting the requirements.
Mr. Benning asked if any hike or bike trail are going to be gained or lost. Ms. Foutz
stated that there is city right-of-way on the backside of the proposed building and they
want to reallocate the use as a public access or greenway. They are hopeful to close on
• the property that is adjacent to the subject property to provide additional access straight
into Wolf Pen Creek.
The Board discussed the south and north building facades. Mr. Shafer described the
south facade as being plain. He said that would be true of the west fagade as well. Mr.
Slattery stated that the primary material of the walls is concrete block. He is proposing to
use the combination of plain and smooth face with a broken face so there is some texture
and pattern. This will help break down the scale of the wall.
The UDO also requires that ground floor facades that face public streets shall have
arcades, display windows, entry areas, awnings, or other such features along no less than
60 % of their horizontal length. Mr. Slattery stated that they are just a little over 50%.
The Board agreed that would be allowed.
Mr. Mather told the Board that they would be erecting a fence on the building side that
would face the Richards Street residents. Mr. Slattery stated that the proposed fence
would be a combination of wood and decorative iron. The fence would be designed to
have some open areas so that you could see the landscaping along the building through
the fence.
Mr. Shafer asked if something could be done with the downspouts to give them a
decorative feature.
•
Mr. Slattery showed the Board the proposed color schemes for the project. The Board
• asked Mr. Slattery if they could see other colors for the roof and building for comparison.
Mr. Slattery said he would explore other options before the next meeting.
Mr. Shafer stated that he liked having visual access into the back of the building through
the fence. It will create a safer environment then one that is completely cut-off. Mr.
Slattery asked if the Board would consider wood along with iron for the fence. Mr.
Benning stated that he is not a fan of wood fencing because they always need repair. Mr.
Mather said the proposed fence is wood but it is not going to something that is thrown up.
The last thing he wants is for the fence to be in disrepair. Mr. Slattery said that the fence
was not in the original submittal and the Board will see it when they come back.
Mr. Mather said that he wants to see some color variation all year with the landscaping in
the back. Mr. Slattery voiced concern with using canopy trees because the root system.
He is sensitive to the foundation implications
Mr. King made the motion to accept the site plan as presented.
Accept the elevations to the south and west with the following recommendations:
—show a pattern of color and texture for the walls
—make the downspouts more decorative
show different color schemes for the roof and building for comparison
• Accept the landscape plan with the following recommendations:
—show additional fence details
show pattern of fencing—with the desire for greater percentage of openness
possibility of taller trees in close proximity to north elevation
Mr. Benning seconded the motion. The Board voted(5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Discussion, consideration, and possible action on site,
sign and fagade improvements for Logan's at 310 College in Northgate.
Staff Planner Jennifer Prochazka presented the staff report and told the Board that this
location is the former Texadelphia Restaurant on the corner of College Main and Patricia
Street. Ms. Prochazka told the Board that the brick fagade has already been done before
gaining approval from this Board.
Mr. Grauke stated that owner has done the work against his recommendation.
The Board discussed the improvements and felt like the owner did not satisfy the
requirements for the Board to make a decision.
•
Mr. King made the motion to table the item. Mr. Benning seconded the motion, which
• passed unopposed(5-0).
Requested information:
Sign information:
need sample of letters & material
how will the sign be lit. Internally lit is discouraged
change sign location so it is at pedestrian level
no plastic letters
Neon on wall:
want material and color samples of the neon and the enclosure that the neon
will run in
will the neon shine up, down or both
More architectural elements in the patio area or on the blank wall.
Landscaping.
want more information on protection of the trees
are the wells in ground or grates. Are they raised planters
need grate details,specifics on openings
want to know the treatment below the trees
• ~need irrigation information
Materials:
need samples of all material to be used
brick
sign
patio tile
covering for existing wood columns
bike rack
Other:
want a minimum 48"railing around upper patio
need irrigation in tree wells.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7: Discussion and consideration of future agenda items.
No items were discussed.
•
•
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8: Adjourn.
Mr. Benning made the motion to adjourn. Mr. King seconded the motion, which passed
unopposed(5-0).
APPROVED:
Scott Shafer
ATTEST:
Deborah Grace, Staff Assistant
•
•
• DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
WOLF PEN CREEK DESIGN DISTRICT
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Lauren Harrel & Jennifer Prochazka Date: January 16, 2004
E-mail: Iharrel@cstx.gov &jprochazka@cstx.gov
For
WOLF PEN CREEK ICE RINK(SDSP)— DESIGN DISTRICT REVIEW (03-316)
Location: 400 Holleman Drive East
Applicant: Fidelis Ventures, L.L.C. —Bill Mather
Item Summary: This is the second review of the Wolf Pen Creek Ice Rink project
and includes review of color and material samples, details of the retaining wall and rear
fence, and all other design elements. This meeting will also be a final review of the
landscape changes requested by the Board.
The results of the previous meeting are as follows:
The Board accepted the site plan as presented.
• The Board had the following recommendations for the south and west elevations:
— show a pattern of color and texture for the walls
make the downspouts more decorative
show different color schemes for the roof and building for comparison
The Board had the following recommendations for the landscape plan:
show additional fence details
show pattern of fencing—with the desire for greater percentage of openness
possibility of taller trees in close proximity to north elevation
Items Issued for Review:
1. Building design
• Elevations
2. Landscaping
Streetscaping/landscaping
3. Color and material samples,
4. Details of retaining wall, rear fence, and other design elements
Additional items such as signage and exterior lighting will come before this Board at a
later date.
Attachments:
• 1. Application
2. Location map
W
• 3. Site plan / Landscape plans
4. Elevations of all building sides
5. Details
6. Meeting Minutes from January 9, 2004
•
•
(> FOR OFFICE USE ONLY, n
n (� CASE NO.: Q,� -� lY
l
DATE SUBMITTEDL
11 30
DESIGN DISTRICT SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION Yom'
Design Review Board
(Check one) ❑ NG-1 ❑ NG-2 ❑ NG-3 C'WPC ❑ Ov
Staff Review Only
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
VSpecial District site plan application completed in full.
$200.00 Application Fee.
$200.00 Special District Review Fee (not required for OV district)
$200.00 Development Permit Application Fee.
$600.00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable. (This fee is payable if construction of a public
waterline, sewerline, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved.)
Ten (10) folded copies of site plan, landscape plan, and dimensioned building elevations (including
signage)
Color and material samples. a de&—�dizeu
A copy of the site plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief a planation as to why they are not
checked off.
Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
• Date of Required Preapplication Conference:
NAME OF PROJECT *01f AES{/
ADDRESS A10U01`*A t AM10
LEGAL DESCRIPTION _f o7` 3R hlo u.s MAT! n4iA e
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name __25�NUX 11E7l .P46TI 144 &A1 XW 70/)VtA1e 1 ) 5/6 8141, )(1.43xZ
Street Address /3127 //1lB�'Ci � eN City ANDVUS ✓
State MAIEi Zip Code 7`7077 E-Mail Address w Pin,*/he r abio fraeE%God
Phone Number w;1705!--4ft5 Fax Number 2811966-lAr?.
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name _5+06 Ifs �fadP�-lG.9-nrT'
Street Address City
State Zip Code E-Mail Address
Phone Number Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name A v/D SLAZY&MY 1t9_4Y1_XC7?i�Plr X10 CD/YS(/G1TAO Di9ylD Slr4lTc�Zy
Street Address ge& RMMAW City
• State s Zip Code 77'043 E-Mail Address ds/a&efY
Phone Number 1252-7324 Fax Number 1 13116_1-1s4/
6/13/03
Page 1 of 6
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact,etc.)
Name /*,46&v eW61AJ&=) C-lb W&A(16i9' M096AW
Street Address city 604L.C66 5J$J7g/V
State M45 Zip Code E-Mail Address
Phone Number Fax Number
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY A& klW
VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S)
#OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED #OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED ZZ-2--
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKLAND DEDICATION
Total Acreage #of Multi-Family Dwelling Units
Floodplain Acreage X$452 =$
Housing Units #of acres in floodplain
#of 1 Bedroom Units #of acres in detention
#of 2 Bedroom Units #of acres in greenways
#of 3 Bedroom Units date dedication approved by Parks Board
#of 4 Bedroom Units COMMERCIAL
FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY Total Acreage 4(,Z34-
#Bedrooms = 132 sq.ft. Building Square Feet A;,.ija
#Bedrooms < 132 sq. ft. Floodplain Acreage 0.0
NOTE: Parkland Dedication fee is due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true and correct.
Signature of Owner,Agent or Applicant Date
6/13/03 Page 2 of 6
2
0
A
G
1R ;ARD
4 4
A
5 �
WE T WOLF
A 3 WPC ARP
PEN
PC WPC
B—/ y
PEN CREEK WOLF PEN
2
CREEK
PARK
Lot 1B
WPC
WPC DEDICATION r0
Lot 1A AREA H
PL
$� 2
63 16 WPC
°�,;�
A.
��ss 62 1415
j rMYrsarew ` � B D � 1J ►°� ��'� 8 9rr
10 C _ 111 `� 1J 7 rr
\\� 9 0 tiN � 1R 10
�� �8 S� ti v� �H ►c4
14 S�ltiRq q A\�ti` e 8 `� '\6 to 8�\ 7
PEN .� ti,6 1J ,� 9 /8 19
11 , ti•` 6 e TROY 17 t�11 sea 9�2 aw3 em
Z AC-1 �' �ti " 12 � .9q �,� ti`0 5 S� S°6 7 15 / 1�"� 1�+ 67 1��01130 31 S
P A 1A13 4p 4 �'� 14 L' �Gp��1�h !6 15 66 ?306 n 1 0
1 9 11 \ J9 5 PDD 14 641364 13r r 28
9 08 J9 ° 2 } ' 4 1J ti 18 1J 14 131Jr1 C> 3
? d° QA l / 1 J 19 1+0.
8 9A B \�O I p` 2 10 11 11 H 20 407 i l fNS�N O 61 1rGo 9 1f
2 ��� 7 B` 6 1 9 �+ ON CR N 21 7 ;
�1 6 , \�G` rs ww PRNICE� 59 8 O SB 1� ni
' � 9 G� 57
City of College Station, Texas I Case:
D w
PMENT REVIEW �I! WOLF P ICE RINK � ' 03-316 RB
SITE DATA
ut}rally,a.p.-[wY WlrtrY! —!Ba
mt
0• Irk I�l..y1} —!•Ir Yr.[fI-u.r1Y __
ar}.�rr rYA•.I�r rr—Yr.It•Y..rK ra •�J1YI--[9N-YL!rf-•
r.�r.ia a.YIYYr.Ia ru_wa}n�rK w y /
imiu-I-` ® m..�or.-r-}a•srr- �- .r s•r�}uI®n-r � .:�' II _ [<'L�- YOL CLW
a wm Ana r }�.allw. s is ilr r.vo r-�-�.� -!'•. �r �+! /y
ua r.�our.aa -a rr:w.ws
ul.o rrs�-rlxr.I m...it nea ---.er: \ W.8AHTCN WAIR0,.R u - -
ME
d LAUREN MUNR0 CARL" �hJ'- " . '_r Ml§,, W
H 0 L L E M A N D R I Y E ��.:_r,' \` �h ` W
Lu
C)
- ------------L----I --'
I
---------------
-----------
�, .�
- _
IY {
CTECF
IlP 9 'L
CDEDE STATION L.-1 I i , —__ I �L -L � - r �T�
-Y&C
• --� q.— I ,- r- ' Ri0P08ED ICE RRwc
li'i --, "----- i wLOTS } I DAVIS nw THaLA McO1.t.
.,•o r! _ r j HO uf PLACE I } m.......— FAMILY fED PARTNERS
s s�-- I mr...-
-- -.�— I WPC
I
Ile—
IL---- If
t_-
--L_ -41-
ay--smos�s
�� '- i i-- - I.,.r- I I i •- 1 I I I � i � I f + � I I I I .�-rerr
U.
• � .Ay}-rra ra
�� MN-srrr
--r's�s rr
-R'Sin-.'Yi- _ ewcw mrr® uc Z.
fi -'_-_• ---- _ • _ __— ___ ---- •�r�ra- M O OR
R I C H A R 0 8 8 T R E E T PROPOSED
•w M SITE PUN
ADCRgN SP-01
/ � PROPOSED SITE PUN
D IEI FI
T
oio
-12 tH
ex.LU
LL.
ELEVATION —i
04 C)
(07i1 106 IM �iii w (a) (ml
Ll
--f LJ
03!��ffi ELEVATION
G MI) ill, (BI
T
-77-
:F
02 EAST ELEVATION
T T
ww'
vim, -A"
ww-
ew
1; =am son
NNF
I I H I H I I- IMIM
EXTERIOR
L-LUfli— ELEVATIONS
I M
01 NORTH ELEVATION • A-05
1
Y
i W
W
U
Lu
LI
mum
02 FENCE ELEVATION
—NOMINAL 2x CEDAR CAP BOARD,
TYPICAL
--3/4'SQUARE METAL TUBING, ,..
TYPICAL rrre
—C WIDE CEDAR PLANKS,
TYPICAL xr ya.om..w
--- 1/2'METAL PICKETS AT C ON
CENTER,TYPICAL
—NOMINAL 8'WIDE CEDAR TRIM
BOARD,TYPICAL �L10'r"f1O
--NOMINAL 4'x4' METAL POSTS,
�--
NOMINAL 87WIDE CEDAR ROT TYPICAL
' BOARD,TYPICAL
-- -3/4'SQUARE METAL TUBING, .
- ------- ----- - -I- ------7---r-- 1 — ice_-- f r TYPICAL — ..�,..
owoa�rAn
7
-
i
tip
I �
� Tl -III I
I
Will
110 IR _.a
MUM
ELEVATIONS
01 FENCE DETAIL A-05.1
I
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
• STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka Date: January 16, 2004
Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov
For
WESLEY FOUNDATION-METHODIST STUDENT CENTER (04-09)
Zoning District: NG-1 Commercial Northgate
Location: 201 Tauber Street
Applicant: Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP
Item Summary: The applicant is proposing to construct a 6 foot sidewalk adjacent to
the back of curb along the east side of Tauber Street. The proposed sidewalk extends
from Church Street to the adjacent Aggieland Credit Union property. The material
proposed is standard gray concrete.
The Northgate Design Guidelines call for stamped died concrete (brick pattern)
sidewalks at a minimum of 6-foot back of curb, with 8-foot sidewalks encouraged.
Item Background: Cross Street Warehouse Apartments, Northgate Condominiums,
A&M United Methodist Church Education Building, Traditions Dormitory, and many
other projects developed in the past couple of years have been required to install the
stamped died concrete sidewalks. In the future, it is the City's goal to have all of the
sidewalks in the area constructed of stamped died concrete.
Issues/Items for Review:
1. Sidewalks
• Placement
• Material
• Width
Attachments:
1. Aerial
2. Application
3. Letter with photos from the applicant
•
,fr
w
AW
� er
r pr`
t .t
do
yxs -`) t�•.'x�� n.,��'r
/ Ilki`7
16,
- A rk` � 1 .��"" 3' ,t of -• y Sri ��u-Mb'.
yr a h
f .
5
•�. �S. � y �MFS y YL.�„ _ '�... J � z/(_
• 410 '�AL
fit. ��,•' '���� � ��'
„ie. IN
U ,..
r .4
y4
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.
DATE SUBMITTED -V q
C. 3
' N�!
DESIGN DISTRICT BUILDING & SIGN REVIEW APPLICA ION
Design Review Board
(Check one) ® NG-1 ❑ NG-2 ❑ NG-3 ❑ WPC ❑ Ov
Staff Review Only
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
✓ Application completed in full.
N/A $200.00 Special District Application fee(Ter- uaivccl tx-r T-unnifer- zrx,.)
N/A Ten (10) folded copies of facade details (including signage) with dimensions. (for Facades only)
N/A Ten (10) folded copies of sign details with dimensions. (for signs only)
N/A Color and material samples.
N/A If attached signage is proposed, provide ten (10) copies of a building elevation showing sign
placement.
Date of Preapplication Conference: Telephone Conference w/Jennifer Prochazka
NAME OF BUSINESS Weslev Foundation-Methodist Student Center
ADDRESS 201 Tauber Street Colleae Station. TX 77840
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Block 5 Lot W 1/2 of 3
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Church/Student Center
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY Same
APPLICANTS INFORMATION:
Name Veronica Morgan
Street Address 511 Universitv Drive East. Suite 204
City Colleae Station State TX Zip Code 77840
E-Mail Address v(a)mitchellandmorcfan.com
Phone Number (979)260-6963 Fax Number (979) 260-3564
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Weslev Foundation Attn: Chris Proctor
Street Address 201 Tauber Street
City Colleae Station State TX Zip Code 77840
E-Mail Address coachl)=40vahoo.com
Phone Number (979)846-4701 Fax Number (979)260-2089
•
6/13/03 Page 1 of 2
r
•
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXTERIOR CHANGES -FKL Ctn+rr IAM CL (i 1L to
-fA- U -Poo4- sduua_( [ cba -to 44%z bwx - ru.rb
. f� prw1dr, C.L nlc,e, walKj rfau- bc+wcen 'i
r. -Fbr nN- onl -+hrj sh ric_n� a.bui- also -for- StWcMS IV-) '
+tie No"ki-e.- restdcn+14( a.r-f.&who walls to C-ampus i cross, a+- 4-he -it rte(
Qt—rauber slr-. + Ifni veri N pr. AND/OR
ATTACHED SIGN FREESTANDING SIGN
Square Footage _N/A Square Footage N/A
All applications (except Overlay district applications)must be reviewed by the Design Review Board. Once a
meeting is scheduled, the applicant will be notified of the date and time so that he can be present to discuss the
proposal with the Board. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein
• and xhibits attached hereto are true and correct.
Signature of ner g nt or Applicant Date -l p�-
•
6/13/03 Page 2 of 2
r
• LJ
January 6, 2003
01
Jennifer Prochazka
COCS-Development Services
�+ P.O. Box 9960
College Station, TX 77840
5 c — Re: Wesley Foundation—Methodist Student Center Proposed Sidewalk
cc 2"d
Q' c Dear Jennifer,
_
LA = B d a The Wesley Foundation—Methodist Student Center would like to construct a
ECA
S c sidewalk along Tauber Street from Church Street to the Aggieland Credit Union
_v N building near University Drive. As seen in the photographs below, there is an
c °- existing plain grey sidewalk along Tauber adjacent to the Aggieland Credit Union
W in w building. In addition,there are existing plain grey sidewalks on Church Avenue
from Tauber to Nagle and from Tauber to Lodge.
ui
W
adch
ri 'C f a
c
n
N C
U n
O UJ
L � M
pin Kew looking at the Metho&W Shident Center on Tauber S&eet(St Mary's sanctuary on left
.J background)
ad
ab
_; 8
` � 1
r
N �f.
r 4
Ile
y�
on
Wkiog
✓ f
f � 4
M 11
1 ✓
atWge Oak tree)
r
view as it
f'
•
i
View looking at the Aggieland Credit Union Tauber Street frontage&plain grey sidewalk
,X
View standrng now Church Street looking south along Tauber toward Univaraity Drive
(Methodist Student Ceder/Aggie&nd GreR Union on left and A&MMdhodcst Sanctuary on
• right-grass area is where sidewalk would be constructed)
•
The Methodist Student Center although in the vicinity of the A&M Methodist
Church is not affiliated with the church but instead is the center for all local
Methodist college students. The center would like to construct a 6 foot sidewalk
adjacent to the back of curb along Tauber to provide a nice walking surface
between University Drive and Church Street for not only their students but also for
students in the Northgate residential area who walk to campus and cross at the
signal at Tauber and University Drive. Due to limited funds, the Methodist
Student Center is requesting to construct this infill sidewalk of plain grey concrete
rather than the Northgate stamped colored concrete sidewalk. The reasons behind
this request are:
• the surrounding sidewalks are all plain grey and this section would
look out of place as stamped colored,
• the adjacent sidewalks are all in good condition and won't need to
be replaced in the near future
• the likelihood of Aggieland Credit Union redeveloping and
therefore the existing sidewalk being replaced as stamped colored is
slim
• • the likelihood of the A&M United Methodist Church Sanctuary
being remodeled along Tauber Street thus requiring a rework of the
existing sidewalk is slim(it is more likely that if the sanctuary is
expanded it would be on the Lodge Street side of the building).
We understand that this request must be forwarded to the Design Review Board
for their approval. We appreciate your help with this project.
If y have any questions or need any further information please give us a call.
Si rely,
Veronica J.B. organ,�.E
Managing Partner
Cc: File
Chris Proctor, Wesley Foundation—Methodist Student Center
r