HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/19/2024 - Regular Agenda Packet - Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board (2)
College Station, TX
Meeting Agenda
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840
Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting
Meeting ID: 269 753 645 57 | Passcode: QfdsL9
Phone: +1 979-431-4880 | Phone Conference: 917 612 881#
The City Council may or may not attend this meeting.
February 19, 2024 3:30 PM Heart of Aggieland Multipurpose
Room
College Station, TX Page 1
Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location
stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by
videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a third
party vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting
access and participation will be in-person only.
1. Call meeting to order and consider absence requests.
2. Hear Visitors.
At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to citizens wishing to address issues not already
scheduled on today's agenda. Each citizen’s presentation will be limited to three minutes in order to
allow adequate time for the completion of the agenda items. Comments will be received and city staff
may be asked to look into the matter, or the matter may be placed on a future agenda for discussion.
A recording may be made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.
3. Agenda Items
3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Attachments: 1. January 8, 2024
3.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding priority rankings for unfunded projects
implementing the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan.
Sponsors: Aspen Pflanz
Attachments: 1. Unfunded Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Prioritization Criteria and
Weights and Score Adjustments
2. List of Unfunded Sidewalk Projects
3. Map of Unfunded Sidewalk Project Priorities
4. List of Unfunded Shared Use Path Projects: Along Street ROW
5. Map of Unfunded Shared Use Path Projects (Along Street ROW)
6. List of Unfunded Shared Use Path Projects: Off-Street Paths
7. Map of Unfunded Shared Use Path Projects (Off-Street Paths) Priorities
8. List of Unfunded Bicycle Facility Projects
9. Map of Unfunded Bicycle Facilities Project Priorities
10. List of Unfunded Bike Route Projects
11. Map of Unfunded Bike Route Project Priorities
3.3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the development of activities for National
Bike Month in May 2024 including a Cycle with Council event.
Page 1 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways
Advisory Board
Page 2 February 19, 2024
3.4. Presentation and discussion regarding the following items related to biking, walking, and
greenways:
a. Public Meetings of Interest
b. Capital and Private Project Updates
3.5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways
Advisory Board calendar of upcoming meetings.
a. March 2024 TBD
b. April 8, 2024 ~ Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Advisory Board Meeting at 3:30 p.m. in
the Heart of Aggieland Multipurpose Room on the 3rd Floor.
4. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
A member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to
a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
5. Adjourn.
Adjournment into Executive Session may occur in order to consider any item listed on the agenda if a
matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on February 14, 2024 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting
and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD
at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the
meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification
at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to
provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly
Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.
Page 2 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways
Advisory Board
Page 3 February 19, 2024
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire
libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411,
Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad
portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 3 of 37
MINUTES
BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND GREENWAYS
ADVISORY BOARD MEETING
January 8, 2024
MEMBERS PRESENT:Chairperson Elizabeth Cunha, Board Members Brad Brimley, Kathy
Langlotz, Joy Chmelar, Jake Madewell, Dennis Jansen, and Neo
Jang
STAFF PRESENT:Director of Planning & Development Services Michael Ostrowski,
Assistant Director of Planning & Development Services Molly
Hitchcock, City Engineer Carol Cotter, Transportation Planning
Coordinator Jason Schubert, Transportation & Mobility Graduate
Engineer II Katherine Beaman-Jamael, Graduate Traffic Engineer
II DeAnna Ordonez, and Staff Assistant II Grecia Fuentes
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to Order and consider absence requests.
Chairperson Cunha called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
There were no absence requests for consideration.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Hear Visitors.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Agenda Items.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.1: Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting
minutes.
Board Member Langlotz motioned to approve the meeting minutes from December, Board
Member Jang seconded the motion, minutes were approved 7-0.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.2: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding priority
rankings for unfunded projects implementing the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways
Master Plan.
Coordinator Jason Schubert presented this item.
Page 4 of 37
Chairperson Cunha asked how many crashes were considered to be in the red area and how many
crashes were considered to be in the yellow area.
Coordinator Schubert answered that he did not have that distinction available, but there was an
average of around thirty pedestrian and forty bicycle crashes a year which included major and
minor crashes.
Board Member Madewell inquired about what a bike-route project would entail. He referenced
to number one on the list that included Park Place from Dexter Drive to Timber Street.
Coordinator Schubert stated that it would include mostly signage or striping, but ideally staff
would have to make sure it was wide enough to do it.
Chairperson Cunha mentioned an example of Southwest Parkway as being a bike route that just
included having green signs along the path that indicated it was a bike route.
Board Member Jang mentioned that he noticed a column from the list that included the speed
limits and asked if there was any consideration of lowering the speed as part of the criteria.
Coordinator Schubert stated that most of the bike routes were thirty miles per hour and that the
State of Texas could default some speed limits depending on the type of development. He added
that to do something less than thirty miles per hour there would have to be a speed study done.
Chairperson Cunha said that from her understanding, if someone wanted to change the speed
limit, they would have to do a study of the existing driving records and get an average of the
speeds already being driven. She clarified that they do not get to just pick a speed limit.
Graduate Engineer II Beaman-Jamael explained the reason for the study being that if a
drastically lower speed limit were to be placed it could potentially lead to accidents based on
expectancy issues.
Coordinator Schubert also added that there were other factors such as how the street was
designed, how wide the lanes were, how sharp the curves were, and whether it was going
horizontal or vertical.
Graduate Engineer II Beaman-Jamael said that staff would not want to artificially reduce speeds
without having the road engineered because that could induce drivers to drive slower. She said
that adding things such as bump outs or lane narrowing are more intensive projects than just
changing the signage.
Board Member Jang brought up an example and asked about the possible reasoning behind two
yellow center lines appearing overnight in a residential street that was already seemingly quiet.
He asked if there were any other things the city could do such as placing the center lines that
could be used to reduce speed.
Page 5 of 37
Graduate Engineer II Beaman-Jamael said that that was a good point and mentioned that striped
lanes could induce drivers to drive slower because when there was none present then it gave
drivers the illusion of a wide one-lane road where they drive more towards the center and have
more comfort in driving faster. She said that was one option to inducing reduced speeds.
Board Member Langlotz brought up another example for making bike routes safer and
referenced to the one on Glade Street. She said a lot of people commute on their bikes on Glade
Street and thinks it would be much safer if the parking were restricted to one side of the street.
She stated that cyclists had to be really careful to stay out of the way of traffic while going
around parked cars because someone might be open their car door and they could run into it.
Graduate Engineer II Beaman-Jamael stated that was a complicated issue because of the
narrowing of the road that could be a speed deterrent.
Board Member Brimley asked if the rankings and scores were based on some of the changed
criteria that had been discussed recently.
Coordinator Schubert clarified that the criteria input used was with the updated census
information, the development from the city, and the crash range from the 2023 crash set.
Board Member Brimley asked if it was known how the rankings had changed with any of the
projects.
Coordinator Schubert stated that staff did not have the number score or whether it went up or
down.
Board Member Dennis asked who decided on those weights.
Coordinator Schubert stated that the Board had discussed and had chosen these in previous
meetings.
Board Member Brimley clarified that the Board had previously discussed these and had an
opportunity to make changes to the weights criteria.
Board Member Dennis expressed that to him it seemed like the weights were reflecting peoples’
preferences. He added that small things would make big things in those weights.
Board Member Brimley asked Board Member Jansen if he was suggesting some kind of
sensitivity analyses.
Board Member Jansen agreed and said that he recalled someone at the last meeting asking what
if we only cared about safety. He said that if you were to put 100 percent weight on safety, you
would get a whole different ranking.
Coordinator Schubert explained the rankings and weighing. He said that with the consideration
of population and some equivalent of demand, if there was a higher population group with more
Page 6 of 37
pedestrians or more cyclists it was likely to be closer in proximity. He also added that obviously
safety was important, but they all would get some level of contention by weight.
Board Member Jansen said that hypothetically speaking if that list was handed out to the Board
and members were asked to fill out the rankings, then there would be a wide variety of answers.
Coordinator Schubert stated that those personal experiences were the purpose of the criteria, to
try and start off with that objective, to put facilities where people were at and to fix issues. He
said what was missing from the map was the importance of that area.
Coordinator Schubert suggested that staff go back and make some adjustments to help list the
projects as high, medium, and low priority based on gathered information and then to present to
the Board. He said it would make it easier to decide on the feasibility of each project.
Chairperson Cunha asked the Board if they agreed to let staff make the adjustments and discuss
at the next meeting.
Board Member Jansen stated he remembered being told before that very few of these projects get
funded. He said without a budget he did not see the point of discussing the projects rankings. He
told staff to do the analysis and let the Board know which ones were being chosen to discuss.
Coordinator Schubert explained that some of these projects are broken down into smaller
feasible segments for bonds and other funding that may become available. He clarified that being
able to have these projects ranked helped when coming down to submitting a grant application or
funding to City Council. He said it makes it more likely to get funding.
Chairperson Cunha told the Board that when the prioritizing is done and the Board is happy with
it, it should be presented to City Council to make them aware so they can become accountable
for funding.
Board Brimley asked if the Board should be working with staff to provide a recommendation to
council.
Director Ostrowski said that it really depended. He clarified that on projects like this one with
capital it was a different type of funding than general. He mentioned that staff would review and
provide a recommendation for the department. He stated that they were also able to add service
level adjustments, which meant additional funds for this particular project or service. He added
that the exercise helps take specific high priority projects and put them forward. Mr. Ostrowski
mentioned there was a small amount of small funds that they could use to fund projects identified
in planning efforts. He said that as Mr. Schubert had mentioned before, none of the projects had
a feasibility analysis done, therefore staff had only provided estimates of the costs per mile. He
clarified that to answer the question, as staff identifies the projects it puts them forward to being
potential capital projects and start looking into them depending on what they are valued at. He
mentioned it would be good idea to get this list solidified over the next month or two.
Page 7 of 37
The Board agreed for staff to make the proposed adjustments and discuss the priority levels at
the next meeting.
Director Ostrowski asked the Board if there were any other components or criteria to add.
Board Member Madewell agreed with the modification just adding or taking away points based
on existing facilities.
Board Member Brimley asked if the revised list could be provided within a week or two for the
Board to look over before the next meeting.
Coordinator Schubert stated he could have it shared with the Board in a couple weeks.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.3: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the
development of activities for National Bike Month in May 2024 including the Cycle with
Council event.
Chairperson Cunha pointed out that the event came about because there was nobody doing any
cycling events before. She mentioned that once more citizens started doing them on their own,
like Board Member Jang, then the Board would not have to continue planning it every year. If
the Board decided to do it again next year, then perhaps the bike routes would have to start to be
reused. She mentioned again that if the event sparked enough momentum within citizens to
continue cycling events on their own, then the Board would retire the Cycle with Council event.
Board member Langlotz suggested having volunteer help to monitor intersections for a safe left
turn. She mentioned that the underpass at Midtown if it rained, cyclists would have to go over
the top where there was no crosswalk. She also expressed her concern for not using the feeder
road for the route and instead taking the bike path back.
Board Member Jang clarified the route did not include the feeder road and that there was actually
a shared-use path for the route.
Board Member Brimley said he liked the route and he felt that any cyclist would be able to ride
the route without any major issues.
Chairperson Cunha asked Coordinator Schubert to initiate the approval process to make sure
there were no issues with the city using that route.
Coordinator Schubert asked the Board to decide on the event date.
The Board agreed to go with May 4th. Staff will look into further arrangements.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.4: Presentation and discussion regarding the following items
related to biking, walking, and greenways:
a)Public Meetings of Interest – No upcoming updates.
Page 8 of 37
b) Capital and Private Project Updates – Rock Prairie coordinating with Union Pacific on
the railroad crossing following the Cain Road closure.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.5: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board calendar of upcoming meetings.
a) February 12, 2024 ~ Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Advisory Board Meeting at 3:30
p.m. in the Heart of Aggieland Multipurpose Room on 3rd Floor of City Hall.
b) March 11, 2024 ~ Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Advisory Board Meeting at 3:30
p.m. in the Heart of Aggieland Multipurpose Room on 3rd Floor of City Hall.
The Board agreed to move the March meeting to March 4, 2024
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
A Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board Member may inquire about a subject
for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the
recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to
place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Board Member Brimley inquired about learning how the budget works for these projects.
Chairperson Cunha requested a follow up on the Bicycle Friendly signs.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
____________________________ ____________________________
Elizabeth Cunha, Chairperson Grecia Fuentes, Board Secretary
Page 9 of 37
February 19, 2024
Item No. 3.2.
Unfunded Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Priorities
Sponsor: Aspen Pflanz, Staff Planner
Reviewed By CBC: Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Greenways Advisory Board
Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding priority rankings for
unfunded projects implementing the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan.
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
Core Services & Infrastructure, Improving Mobility
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends the Board review the adjusted priority rankings for each
project type and make any necessary adjustments to establish a finalized list of project rankings and
prioritization categories.
Summary: This item is a continuation of the discussion from the January 8, 2024 Board meeting
regarding priority rankings of unfunded bicycle and pedestrian projects. Recent revisions to the
planned pedestrian and bicycle networks adopted into the City’s Comprehensive Plan initiated an
update to this list of stand-alone projects and their associated prioritization. One of the duties of the
Board is to provide recommendations regarding capital project priorities related to biking, walking,
and greenways.
The updated priority rankings for stand-alone bicycle facility, bike route, sidewalk, and shared use
path projects are attached. The Board began discussions of unfunded sidewalk and shared use path
projects at the December 18, 2023 meeting and of unfunded bicycle facility and bike route projects at
the January 8, 2024 meeting. The Board expressed interest in prioritizing projects that were near
schools and high crash areas, created recreation opportunities in open/undeveloped areas, and
qualified for additional funding sources. Staff has compiled notes to provide additional context to
assist in the Board’s assessment of each project, such as if the project fills a gap in the network, if
there is an existing facility on one side of the street, if the project is in a low-to-moderate income area
(LMI Area), a criterion for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, if the project abuts
a park, if the project is aligned with the street right-of-way or not, and other considerations. These
project lists have since been updated to incorporate the Board’s initial feedback and the draft priority
rankings have been adjusted accordingly.
Because several projects had equal ranking scores, the Board advised staff to refine the project
scores further and arrange projects into distinct High, Medium, and Low prioritization categories.
Specifically, the scores of sidewalk and shared use path projects were adjusted to add points to
projects with characteristics not already accounted for in the GIS prioritization model. Sidewalk
projects received additional points if the project has no existing facility present, is along a
thoroughfare, or fills a gap in the network (+0.5 point each). Shared use path projects received
additional points if the project has no existing sidewalk, is along a major arterial or highway, connects
to existing facilities, or is within city-owned property or easement (+1.0 point each). Bicycle facility
and bike route projects did not receive adjustments to their scores due to the technical considerations
of their feasibility and potential to include with ongoing city street projects.
After adjusting the project scores, staff sorted the projects into High, Medium, and Low Priority
categories to focus the Board’s discussion on groupings of projects rather than on each individual
Page 10 of 37
project. The Initial 2024 Rank and Score (calculated before staff adjustments) and 2021 Rank and
Score are included on the project lists so the Board can examine how project priorities have changed
throughout the evaluation process. Projects that have significantly risen or dropped in rank are
typically the result of the 2021 unfunded projects prioritization process in which staff and the Board
concluding that a project should move to the top or bottom of the overall prioritization list based on
factors such as the completion of a preliminary engineering report (PER) or an existing facility
already in place.
Staff added a “BPG Board Priority” column to each project list so that the Board may indicate which
projects they determine should move up or down in the current High, Medium, and Low prioritization
categories. This approach is intended to finalize the Board’s recommendation of the unfunded stand-
alone projects implementing the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan and will assist in
further discussions about specific project selection and implementation.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Unfunded Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Prioritization Criteria and Weights and Score
Adjustments
2. List of Unfunded Sidewalk Projects
3. Map of Unfunded Sidewalk Project Priorities
4. List of Unfunded Shared Use Path Projects: Along Street ROW
5. Map of Unfunded Shared Use Path Projects (Along Street ROW)
6. List of Unfunded Shared Use Path Projects: Off-Street Paths
7. Map of Unfunded Shared Use Path Projects (Off-Street Paths) Priorities
8. List of Unfunded Bicycle Facility Projects
9. Map of Unfunded Bicycle Facilities Project Priorities
10. List of Unfunded Bike Route Projects
11. Map of Unfunded Bike Route Project Priorities
Page 11 of 37
Unfunded Bicycle and Pedestrian Project PrioriƟzaƟon Criteria and Weights
PrioriƟzaƟon Criteria:
PopulaƟon Data – sourced from BCSMPO (future) and Census/ACS (exisƟng)
Safety (automobile/bicycle/pedestrian crash incidents) – sourced from PD crash incident reports
from the last 3 years
Schools – CSISD Property – sourced from city data layer; includes exisƟng CSISD structures
Parks – sourced from city data layer; excludes cemeteries
Texas A&M University – sourced from city data layer; includes Main Campus, West Campus, and
other perƟnent parcels (HSC Campus, Future Rellis Campus, Equestrian center, etc.); excludes
the golf course and any green space on Main and West campus
Bus Stops – sourced from TAMU and BTD; includes Aggie Spirit fixed stops and BTD Ɵmestamp
locaƟons (as BTD does not currently have fixed stops)
Key DesƟnaƟons – sourced from city data layer; includes exisƟng desƟnaƟons under
construcƟon/review
Public Requests – sourced from city data; includes data from public input on surveys/interacƟve
maps and public meeƟngs
PrioriƟzaƟon Weights and Score Adjustments:
Sidewalks:
Factors Weight
PopulaƟon Served (PopulaƟon
Density) 12
EXISITING
PopulaƟon Served (PopulaƟon
Density) 6
FUTURE
Safety (Automobile/Pedestrian
Crashes) 12 MAJOR (FAT, MAJ, HIT/INJ,
DWI/MAJ)
Safety (Automobile/Pedestrian
Crashes) 6
MINOR (MIN, NON, HIT, DWI/MIN)
Schools (ExisƟng and Future) 18
Parks (ExisƟng and Future) 13
Texas A&M University 10
Public Requests 10
Other Key DesƟnaƟons (Shopping
Centers, Grocery Stores, Major
Employers)
7
Bus Stops 6
100
Score Adjustments Points
No exisƟng sidewalk on
opposite side + 0.5
Along exisƟng thoroughfare + 0.5
Fills gap between exisƟng
sidewalks (<= 0.1 miles) + 0.5
Page 12 of 37
Shared Use Paths:
Factors Weight
PopulaƟon Served (PopulaƟon Density) 12 EXISITING
PopulaƟon Served (PopulaƟon Density) 6 FUTURE
Safety (Automobile/Bike & Pedestrian
Crashes) 12
MAJOR (FAT, MAJ, HIT/INJ, DWI/MAJ)
Safety (Automobile/Pedestrian
Crashes) 6
MINOR (MIN, NON, HIT, DWI/MIN)
Schools (ExisƟng and Future) 18
Parks (ExisƟng and Future) 13
Texas A&M University 10
Public Requests 10
Other Key DesƟnaƟons (Shopping
Centers, Grocery Stores, Major
Employers)
7
Bus Stops 6
100
Bicycle FaciliƟes and Bike Routes:
Factors Weight
PopulaƟon Served (PopulaƟon Density) 12 EXISITING
PopulaƟon Served (PopulaƟon Density) 6 FUTURE
Safety (Automobile/Bicycle Crashes) 12 MAJOR (FAT, MAJ, HIT/INJ, DWI/MAJ)
Safety (Automobile/Pedestrian Crashes) 6 MINOR (MIN, NON, HIT, DWI/MIN)
Schools (ExisƟng and Future) 18
Parks (ExisƟng and Future) 13
Texas A&M University 10
Public Requests 10
Other Key DesƟnaƟons (Shopping
Centers, Grocery Stores, Major
Employers)
7
Bus Stops 6
100
Score Adjustments Points
Along Street ROW
No exisƟng sidewalk + 1.0
On major arterial or highway + 1.0
Score Adjustments Points
Off-Street Paths
Connects exisƟng faciliƟes (not
dead end) + 1.0
On City property or exisƟng
easement + 1.0
Page 13 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Sidewalk Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score
Adjustments
(+0.5 each): No
Facility (N), Tfare
(T), and Gap <= 0.1
miles (G)
Initial
2024
Rank
&
Score
2021
Rank
&
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
1
8.33 N, T, G 12
6.835
7
7.000 TIMBER STREET 630 FT SE OF GEORGE
BUSH DR PARK PLACE 0.20 A $ 243,846 No facility; LMI area
2
8.266 N, G 1
7.266
1
7.393 PARK PLACE 1 ANDERSON ST BACK OF HEB 0.34 A $ 404,623
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities;
limited ROW and design constraints due to
topography; LMI area
3a
8.000 N, G 2a
7.000
n/a
7.000 POPLAR ST 1 TEXAS AV 165 FT NE OF TEXAS AV 0.03 B $ 38,479
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities;
LMI area
3b
8.000 N, G 2b
7.000
n/a
6.561 ASH STREET 2 EISENHOWER ST NIMITZ ST 0.06 B $ 67,970 No facility; LMI area
3c
8.000 T, G 2c
7.000
3
7.000 UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD 445 FT NE of GEORGE
BUSH DR E GEORGE BUSH DR E 0.08 B $ 99,947
Existing facility on opposite side of street; fills
gap between existing facility out to proposed
facility on George Bush Dr E; LMI area
3d
8.000 N, T 2d
7.000
5
7.000 GEORGE BUSH DR E 1 DOMINIK DR UNIVERSITY OAKS BL 0.12 B $ 144,531
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities;
desire paths present and high pedestrian use;
LMI area
3e
8.000 N, T 2h
7.000
6
7.000
UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD
3 OLYMPIA WY STALLINGS DR 0.14 B $ 164,572
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities;
LMI area
8
7.917 N, G 11
6.917
n/a
6.234 POPLAR ST 2 EISENHOWER ST
445 FT SW OF
EISENHOWER ST 0.08 B $ 101,878
No facility; fills gap between facilities; LMI
area
9a
7.500 N, T, G 25d
6.000
2
7.000 FOSTER AVENUE LINCOLN AVE WALTON DR 0.10 B $ 120,555
No facility; fills gap between existing Walton
Dr and Lincoln Ave; LMI area
9b
7.500 N 2e
7.000
n/a
6.589 LIVE OAK ST 1 EISENHOWER ST TURNER ST 0.13 B $ 161,438 No facility; LMI area
9c
7.500 N, T, G 25n
6.000
9
7.000 NUECES DRIVE GUADALUPE DR HARVEY MITCHELL PW S 0.07 A $ 85,351
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities;
connects into SUP on Fm 2818; LMI area
9d
7.500 T 2f
7.000
86
7.613 HOLLEMAN DRIVE 5 430FT N OF VILLAGE DR ANDERSON ST 0.16 A $ 190,362
Existing facility on opposide side of street; fills
gap between existing facilities; LMI area
9e
7.500 T 2g
7.000
75
8.000 ANDERSON STREET VILLAGE DR. HOLLEMAN DR. 0.11 A $ 129,160
Existing facility opposite side of street; LMI
area
HIGH PRIORITY
1
Page 14 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Sidewalk Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score
Adjustments
(+0.5 each): No
Facility (N), Tfare
(T), and Gap <= 0.1
miles (G)
Initial
2024
Rank
&
Score
2021
Rank
&
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
9f
7.500 N 2i
7.000
n/a
6.735 TURNER ST POPLAR ST 145 FT SE OF ASH ST 0.13 B $ 161,021 No facility; LMI area
15
7.377 N, T 16
6.377
56
5.716 NAGLE STREET INLOW BL CROSS ST 0.13 A $ 151,344
No facility on most of segment; connects into
City of Bryan; LMI area
16
7.233 T 13
6.733
n/a
6.816 EISENHOWER ST 1 UNIVERSITY DR E ASH ST 0.18 B $ 219,618
Existing facility on opposite side of street; LMI
area
17
7.096 N, T, G 61
5.596
20
6.769 DEXTER DRIVE SOUTH 1 WINDING RD HANES DR 0.25 A $ 298,204
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities
on Dexter Dr S; establishes a pedestrian
crossing over Holleman Dr; LMI area
18
7.013 N, T 23
6.013
19
6.802 FAIRVIEW AVENUE GEORGE BUSH DR LUTHER ST 0.39 A $ 472,846 No facility; LMI area
19a
7.000 N, G 25b
6.000
17
6.976 PHOENIX STREET HOLLEMAN DR
445 FT SE OF
HOLLEMAN DR 0.08 A $ 100,951
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities;
LMI area
19b
7.000 N, G 25c
6.000
11
7.000 JAMES PARKWAY NORTHSIDE FRANCIS DR SOUTHSIDE FRANCIS DR 0.03 B $ 35,527
Would create crossing between each side of
Thomas Park; adjacent to existing crossing;
LMI area
19c
7.000 N, G 25e
6.000
49
6.000 FLOWER MOUND DRIVE WESTFIELD DR SPRINGFIELD DR 0.03 C $ 37,099
Fills gap between existing facility on Flower
Mound Dr and path from Westfield Dr into
Creek View Elementary School
19d
7.000 T, G 25f
6.000
80
6.716 HOLLEMAN DRIVE 1 FAIRVEW AVE GEORGIA ST 0.03 A $ 37,090
Existing facility on opposide side of street; fills
gap between existing facilities; LMI area
19e
7.000 N, T 25h
6.000
25
6.547 ANDERSON STREET 1 SOUTHWEST PKWY
ENTRANCE OF COLLEGE
STATION CITY
CEMETARY
0.17 A $ 204,190 No facility; LMI area
19f
7.000 N, T 25l
6.000
53
5.999 SCARLETT OHARA DRIVE UNIVERSITY OAKS BL HARVEY RD 0.15 B $ 178,665 No facility; LMI area
19g
7.000 N, T 25m
6.000
8
7.000 WALTON DRIVE PURYEAR DR FOSTER AV 0.22 B $ 269,595
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities;
LMI area
19h
7.000 N, T 25q
6.000
55
5.802
UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD
2 TARA CT RHETT BUTLER DR 0.42 B $ 498,672 No facility; LMI area
19i
7.000 N, G 25w
6.000
n/a
7.000 GROVE ST WELLBORN RD
135 FT NE OF
WELLBORN RD 0.03 A $ 31,609
No facility; fills gap between existing facility
out to Wellborn Rd; LMI area
2
Page 15 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Sidewalk Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score
Adjustments
(+0.5 each): No
Facility (N), Tfare
(T), and Gap <= 0.1
miles (G)
Initial
2024
Rank
&
Score
2021
Rank
&
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
19j
7.000 N, T 25x
6.000
21
6.724 WALTON DRIVE 1 NUNN ST FRANCIS DR 0.26 B $ 312,907
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities;
LMI area
19k
7.000 T, G 25ab
6.000
78
7.000 HOLLEMAN DRIVE 3 375 FT NE OF ELEANOR
ST ELEANOR ST 0.07 A $ 85,356
Existing facility on opposide side of street; fills
gap between existing facilities; LMI area
19l
7.000 N, G 25ac
6.000
41
6.000 ELEANOR STREET MONTCLAIR AVE THOMPSON ST. 0.06 A $ 70,620 Fills gap between existing facilities; LMI area
19m
7.000 N, G 25ad
6.000
48
6.000 HARVEST DRIVE SPRINGFIELD DR WESTFIELD DR 0.03 C $ 36,423
Fills gap between existing facilties on Harvest
Dr into Cypress Grove Intermediate School
19n
7.000 N, G 25ae
6.000
4
7.000 KYLE AVENUE PURYEAR DR
130 FT SW OF PURYEAR
DR 0.04 B $ 42,301
No facility; fills gap between existing facility
on Kyle Ave into Thomas Park; LMI area
33
6.999 N, G 55
5.999
n/a
6.760 MOSS ST TEXAS AV FOSTER AV 0.09 B $ 105,756 No facility; LMI area
34
6.948 N 14
6.448
n/a
6.651 POPLAR ST 4 EISENHOWER ST TURNER ST 0.14 B $ 162,459 No facility; LMI area
35
6.930 N, G 56
5.930
n/a
6.537 FIDELITY ST WELLBORN RD MONTCLAIR AV 0.21 A $ 252,663 No facility; LMI area
36
6.898 T 15
6.398
77
7.000 WELSH AVENUE 1 NEVADA ST SOUTHWEST PW 0.19 A $ 233,523
Existing facility on opposite side of street; fills
gap between existing facility out towards SH
6; LMI area
37
6.860 N 17
6.360
18
6.828 CAUDILL STREET HOLLEMAN DR GUNSMITH ST 0.37 A $ 448,678 No existing facility; LMI area
38
6.854 N 18
6.354
29
6.413 GUNSMITH STREET TRIGGER ST CAUDILL ST 0.09 A $ 111,459 No facility; LMI area
39
6.763 T 19
6.263
16
7.075 WELSH AVENUE 2 SOUTHWEST PW HARVEY MITCHELL PW S 0.46 A $ 546,546
Existing facility on opposite side of street; fills
gap between existing facility out towards SH
6; LMI area
40
6.756 N 20
6.256
15
7.000 TRIGGER STREET GUNSMITH ST DEXTER DR S 0.12 A $ 142,449 No facility; LMI area
41
6.623 N, T, G 70
5.123
40
6.000
BRENTWOOD DRIVE
EAST BRENTWOOD DR E BRENTWOOD DR
(ACROSS TEXAS AVE S)0.05 B, A $ 57,137
Fills gap between existing facillities on
Brentwood Dr E between Dairy Queen and
Aggieland Automotive; LMI area
MEDIUM PRIORITY
3
Page 16 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Sidewalk Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score
Adjustments
(+0.5 each): No
Facility (N), Tfare
(T), and Gap <= 0.1
miles (G)
Initial
2024
Rank
&
Score
2021
Rank
&
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
42
6.585 N 22
6.085
27
6.514 HAINES DRIVE TAURUS AV LANGFORD ST 0.27 A $ 323,303
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities;
LMI area
43
6.509 N 24
6.009
22
6.596 WELLESLEY COURT UNIVERSITY TOWN
CENTER CONNECTOR TARROW ST 0.15 B $ 174,529 No facility; fills gap between existing facilities
44a
6.500 G 25a
6.000
14
7.000 PURYEAR DRIVE KYLE AV DOMINIK DR 0.03 B $ 38,099 LMI area
44b
6.500 N, T, G 77b
5.000
51
6.000 MERRY OAKS DRIVE DOMINIK DR MAGNOLIA DR 0.05 B $ 58,684 No facility; fills gap between existing facilities
44c
6.500 N 25g
6.000
46
6.000 PEDERNALES DRIVE SAN BENITO DR VAL VERDE DR 0.05 A $ 58,361
No facility; would shorten gap between
facilities but not eliminate it; LMI area
44d
6.500 T 25i
6.000
76
7.000 HOLLEMAN DRIVE 4 ARIZONA ST WELLBORN RD 0.18 A $ 218,393
Existing facility on opposide side of street; fills
gap between existing facilities; LMI area
44e
6.500 N 25j
6.000
39
6.000 HONDO DRIVE SOUTHWEST PW NUECES DR 0.21 A $ 251,325 No facility; LMI area
44f
6.500 N 25k
6.000
26
6.523 SOUTHLAND STREET ONEY HERVEY DR WELLBORN RD 0.20 A $ 239,132
No facility; connects to Oney Hervey cul-de-
sac; LMI area
44g
6.500 N 25o
6.000
12
7.000 GEORGIA STREET HOLLEMAN DR NEVADA ST 0.25 A $ 294,394 No facility; LMI area
44h
6.500 T 25p
6.000
13
7.000 WELSH AVENUE HOLLEMAN DR SWISS CT 0.15 A $ 184,714
Existing facility on opposite side of street; fills
gap between existing facility out towards SH
6; LMI area
44i
6.500 N 25r
6.000
59
5.453 VALLEY VIEW DRIVE LONGMIRE DR SOUTHWOOD DR 0.28 A $ 330,421 No facility; LMI area
44j
6.500 N 25s
6.000
28
6.489 NEVADA STREET WELSH AV PHOENIX ST 0.19 A $ 229,035 No facility; LMI area
44k
6.500 N 25t
6.000
31
6.207 GILCHRIST AVE EAST FOSTER AV PURYEAR DR 0.16 B $ 187,670
No facility; fills gap between facilities; LMI
area
44l
6.500 N 25u
6.000
10
7.000 DEXTER DRIVE SOUTH LLANO PL CONCHO PL 0.11 A $ 131,547
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities
on Dexter Dr S; LMI area
44m
6.500 N 25v
6.000
45
6.000 PHOENIX STREET 1 680 FT NW OF NEVADA
ST NEVADA ST 0.13 A $ 150,981 No facility; LMI area
4
Page 17 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Sidewalk Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score
Adjustments
(+0.5 each): No
Facility (N), Tfare
(T), and Gap <= 0.1
miles (G)
Initial
2024
Rank
&
Score
2021
Rank
&
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
44n
6.500 G 25y
6.000
52
6.000
COMAL TO ARBOLES
CONNECTION COMAL CIRCLE ARBOLES CIRCLE 0.07 A $ 80,938
Connection between two cul-de-sacs; would
require ROW acquisition
44o
6.500 N 25z
6.000
30
6.302 VAL VERDE DRIVE RIO GRANDE BL PEDERNALES DR 0.20 A $ 234,313 No facility; LMI area
59
6.392 N, T 64
5.392
79
6.751
HOLLEMAN DRIVE WEST
1 MARION PUGH DR CORREGIDOR DR 0.43 A $ 520,613
Existing facility on most of the opposide side
of street; fills gap between existing facilities;
LMI area
60
6.361 N, T 66
5.361
60
5.116 MANUEL DRIVE CREST ST CORNELL DR 0.26 B $ 309,992 No facility; LMI area
61
6.357 N 57
5.857
54
5.989 TODD TRAIL 1 LONGMIRE DR BROTHERS BL 0.27 A $ 329,315 No facility; fills gap between existing facilities
62
6.328 T 58
5.828
80
6.716 HOLLEMAN DRIVE 2 ANDERSON ST WELSH AVE 0.68 A $ 815,226
Existing facility on opposide side of street; fills
gap between existing facilities; LMI area
63
6.204 N, T 69
5.204
58
5.589 TARROW STREET E 29TH ST PEYTON ST 0.50 B $ 603,227 No facility; LMI area
64
6.191
59
5.691
32
6.193 TODD TRAIL SOUTHWOOD DR RIO GRANDE BL 0.36 A $ 437,704 No facility; fills gap between existing facilities
65a
6.177
21
6.177
n/a
0.000 WALTON DR 2 TEXAS AVE S WALTON DR 0.10 B $ 119,172
Existing facility present; this project is
somewhat of a realignment/alternate route;
LMI area
65b
6.177 N 60
5.677
n/a
6.000 EISENHOWER ST 3 180 FT SE OF COONER
ST COONER ST 0.03 B $ 41,103
No facility; would shorten gap between
facilities but not eliminate it; LMI area
67
6.066 N, T 71
5.066
24
6.563 HOLLEMAN DRIVE WEST WOODWAY DR LEGACY LN 0.27 A $ 319,626
Existing facility on a portion of the opposide
side of street; fills gap between existing
facilities; LMI area
68
6.032 N 62
5.532
n/a
6.000 NIMITZ ST 415 FT SE OF COONER
ST COONER ST 0.08 B $ 94,615
No facility; would shorten gap between
facilities but not eliminate it; LMI area
69
6.028 N, T 73
5.028
47
6.000 HARVEY ROAD EARL RUDDER FW S
FRONTAGE RD W
740FT NE OF RHETT
BUTLER DR 0.32 B $ 378,167
No facility; fills gap between facilities; LMI
area
70
6.022 T, G 74
5.022
81
6.000 NAVARRO DRIVE WELSH AV PINTAIL LN 0.09 A $ 102,811
Existing facility on opposite side of street; fills
gap between existing facilities; LMI area
5
Page 18 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Sidewalk Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score
Adjustments
(+0.5 each): No
Facility (N), Tfare
(T), and Gap <= 0.1
miles (G)
Initial
2024
Rank
&
Score
2021
Rank
&
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
71a
6.000 N, T 77d
5.000
66
5.000 DECATUR DRIVE FRONT ROYAL DR. PUBLIC ALLEY 0.17 C $ 202,478
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities
on Decatur Dr
71b
6.000 T, G 77e
5.000
44
6.000
FM 2818 SERVICE ROAD
1 LONGMIRE DR 250 FT SW FROM
LONGMIRE DR 0.05 A $ 59,226
Fills gap between Glo Premier Auto Spa and
Longmire Dr; adjacent to funded shared use
path project with TxDOT
71c
6.000 N, T 77g
5.000
57
5.657 TARROW STREET EAST TARROW ST UNIVERSITY DR E 0.20 B $ 238,100 No facility; LMI area
71d
6.000 N, G 77h
5.000
38
6.000 RHETT BUTLER DRIVE BAYOU WOODS DR HARDWOOD LN 0.06 B $ 73,329 No facility
71e
6.000 T, G 77k
5.000
43
6.000 FM 2818 SERVICE ROAD HILLTOP DR.
500FT SW OF
LONGMIRE DR.0.09 A $ 110,339
Fills gap between Hilltop Dr and the end of
Post Office property line; adjacent to funded
shared use path project with TxDOT
71f
6.000 T, G 77l
5.000
82
6.000 DEACON DRIVE DURANGO CT FRATERNITY ROW 0.06 A $ 71,791
Existing facility on opposite side of street; fills
gap between Fraternity Row and Durango St
71g
6.000 N, G 77n
5.000
65
5.000 HEARTHSTONE CIRCLE CHIMNEY HILL CR TARROW ST 0.04 B $ 46,289
No facility; fills gap between existing facilities;
LMI area
78
5.969 N 63
5.469
n/a
6.000 MACARTHUR ST 1 UNIVERSITY DR E COONER ST 0.13 B $ 160,862 No facility; LMI area
79
5.891 N 65
5.391
n/a
6.000 COONER STREET 2 260 FT NE OF
MACARTHUR ST END OF COONER ST 0.05 B $ 55,533
No facility; would shorten gap between
facilities but not eliminate it; LMI area
80
5.799 T 67
5.299
63
5.046
UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD
1 TARA CT MERRY OAKS DR 0.04 B $ 46,507
Existing facility on opposite side of street; fills
gap between existing facility out towards SH 6
81
5.739 N 68
5.239
36
6.000 ARGUELLO DRIVE CHIMNEY HILL DR TARROW ST 0.11 B $ 137,456 No facility; LMI area
82
5.553 N 72
5.053
42
6.000 AIRLINE DRIVE SOUTHWOOD DR SHENANDOAH DR 0.20 A $ 242,346
LOW PRIORITY
6
Page 19 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Sidewalk Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score
Adjustments
(+0.5 each): No
Facility (N), Tfare
(T), and Gap <= 0.1
miles (G)
Initial
2024
Rank
&
Score
2021
Rank
&
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
83
5.507 N 75
5.007
37
6.000 BAYOU WOODS DRIVE RHETT BUTLER DR. HARDWOOD LN. 0.17 B $ 202,735
Fills gap between existing facilities on Bayou
Woods Dr
84
5.506 N 76
5.006
33
6.051 WOODWAY DRIVE WOODSMAN DR HOLLEMAN DR W 0.03 A $ 38,289
No facility; would shorten gap between
facilities but not eliminate it; LMI area
85a
5.500 N 77a
5.000
61
5.105 AUTUMN CIRCLE TARROW ST 130 FT E OF TARROW ST 0.02 B $ 27,492
Fills gap between existing facility on Autumn
Cr out to Tarrow St (which has no facility yet);
LMI area
85b
5.500 N 77i
5.000
67
5.000 SHADY DRIVE FOREST DR FRANCIS DR 0.15 B $ 183,823 No facility; fills gap between facilities
85c
5.500 N 77j
5.000
64
5.017 NORMAND DRIVE DEACON DR PONDEROSA DR 0.47 A $ 560,439 No facility
85d
5.500 G 77m
5.000
84
6.000 FRATERNITY ROW 1 FM 2154
FRATERNITY ROW
PARKING LOT
ENTRANCE
0.02 A $ 24,481
Fills gap between existing sidewalk and
Wellborn Rd
89
5.471 N, T 91
4.471
68
4.597 GATEWAY BLVD LAKEWAY DR SH 6 0.20 D $ 235,768 No facility
90
5.272 N, T 92
4.272
69
4.318
SOUTHERN PLANTATION
DRIVE SH 6 S STONY CREEK LN 0.46 C $ 557,837 No facility; stubbed out to SH 6
91a
5.000
77c
5.000
n/a
6.000 JANE ST 1 135 FT SE OF COONER
ST COONER ST 0.03 B $ 31,104
Existing facility on opposite side of street; fills
gap between existing facilities; LMI area
91b
5.000
77f
5.000
83
6.000 FRATERNITY ROW DEACON DR
FRATERNITY ROW
CORNER 0.11 A $ 129,351
Existing facility on opposite side of street; fills
gap between existing facilities
91c
5.000 N, G 93a
4.000
72
4.000
WILDERNESS DRIVE
NORTH BUTLER RIDGE DR RAINTREE DR 0.08 B $ 91,779 No facility; fills gap between existing facilities
91d
5.000 T, G 93b
4.000
n/a
5.000 PONDEROSA DRIVE SH 6 S FRONTAGE RD W LONGMIRE DR 0.03 A $ 35,465
Existing facility on opposite side of street (but
is not connected to anything else); fills gap
between existing facilities
7
Page 20 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Sidewalk Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score
Adjustments
(+0.5 each): No
Facility (N), Tfare
(T), and Gap <= 0.1
miles (G)
Initial
2024
Rank
&
Score
2021
Rank
&
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
95
4.732 N, T 96
3.732
n/a
4.000 FOXFIRE DRIVE SEBESTA RD. CONCORD CR. 0.46 B $ 548,512 No facility; rural tfare context zone
96
4.631 N, T 97
3.631
n/a
3.000 GREAT OAKS DRIVE ARBOLEDA DR ROCK PRAIRIE RD W 0.76 C, A $ 912,041 No facility; LMI area
97
4.500 T 93c
4.000
74
4.000 RAINTREE DRIVE WILDERNESS DR N FOREST OAKS DR 0.19 B $ 230,144
Existing facility on opposite side of street;
would shorten gap between facilities but not
eliminate it
98
4.082 G 98
3.582
73
4.000
WOODCREEK
CONNECTOR BROOKWATER CR. SHADOWCREST DR 0.06 B $ 73,044
Fills gap between existing facility on
Brookwater Cr and path into Woodcreek Park
99a
4.000 N, T 100a
3.000
71
4.000 SANDSTONE DRIVE EMERALD PW SEBESTA RD 0.12 B $ 148,896 No facility
99b
4.000 N, T 100b
3.000
n/a
2.639 ARBOLEDA DRIVE QUAIL RUN GREAT OAKS DR 0.33 A $ 399,643 No facility; LMI area
101
3.503 N 99
3.003
70
4.000 SHADOWCREST DRIVE TIMBER KNOLL DR WOODCREEK DR 0.24 B $ 286,355 No facility; fills gap between facilities
8
Page 21 of 37
nmnm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
85d
85a
91a
19i
101
19b
91d
19m
19d
19c
84
3a
19n
65b
71g
80
79
41
44c
44b
71b
98
3b
19l
71f
71d
44n
9c
19k
91c
68
3c
19a
8
70
33
38
71e
65a9a
91b
9e
44l40
3d
99a
15
44m
78
9f
9b
34
3e
43
19f
44h
85b
44k
9d
83
19e
44d
16
44j
97
44o
36
89
71c
44f 82
1
44e
101
35
19g
44g
17
19j
60
67
42
61
44i
2
64
37
18
19h
59 39
95
90
85c
63
62
96
HOLLEMANDRS
BARRO
N RD
HOLLEM
A
N
D
R UNIVERSITY DR EWEL
L
BO
R
N
R
D
N
W VILLA
MARI
A RD
H O LLEM A N D RES O U T H W ESTPWANDERSONSTWEL
L
B
O
R
N
R
D E 29TH
ST
CO
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
WELS
H
AV
TE
X
A
S
A
V
S
E
A
R
L
RUDD
E
R
FW
S
C
A
V
I
T
T
A
V
DART
M
O
UTH
STGROESBECK STUNIVERSITYDRLINCOLN A
V
SOUTH
WEST P
W EE VILLA MARIA RDS
CO
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
E BROOKSI
DE DR
N
EA
R
L
R
U
DD
E
R
FW
GEORGE B
USH DR
W
S T
E
X
A
S
A
V
VI
C
T
O
R
I
A
A
VFINFEATHER RDCAPSTONE
D
RRAYMOND STOTZER P
W HARVEY RDLEONARD RD
AR
R
ING
TON
RD
TE
X
A
S
A
V
GEORGEBUSH DRGREENSPRAIRIERDFM
2
1
5
4
N
H
A
R
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
P
W
H
A
R
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
PW
S
ROCK PRA
I
R
I
E
R
D
W
O
O
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
SH 30BRIARCREST DR
SH
6
S
FM 15
8
WILLIAMDFITCHPWRIVERSIDEPW
RAYMOND STOTZER T
O
R
I
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
P
W
nm
nm
nmnmnmTI
M
B
E
R
S
T
JO
N
E
S
B
U
T
L
E
R
R
D
DEXTER
D
R
GLADESTDEXT
ERDRS
NUE CESDR
FA
I
R
V
I
E
W
A
V
MARION
PUGH
DRPARK PLACELUTHER ST W GEORGEBU SHDRGEORGE BUSH DR W
ANDERSON ST
SOUT
H
W
E
S
T
P
WWEL
SH
A
V HOLLEMAN DR
H O LLE M A N D R WWE
L
L
B
ORNRDTE
X
A
S
A
V
S
19i
19d
84
19l
44n
9c
19k
19a
38
2
67
9e
44l
40
44m
44h
9d
44d 44j 36
44f
1
44e
35
44g
17 42
59
37
18
39
62
nmTANGLEWOOD
DR
WALTONDRSPRING LOGARDENACRESBL
MU
N
S
O
N
A
V
FRANCIS DRN ROSEMARY DRTARRO
W
ST
LINCOLN AV
S T
E
X
A
S
A
V
UNIVERSITY DR
UNIVERS
I
T
Y
D
R
E
TE
X
A
S
A
V
85a
91a
19b
3a
65b
71g
79
3b
68
8
65a
9a
78
9f
9b
34
43
16
71c
19g
19j
63
¯0 10.5
Miles
Unfunded Sidewalk Project Priorities
February 2024
Prioritization Category
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
nm Schools
Parks
A
B
A
B
Page 22 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Shared Use Path Projects: Along Street ROW
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score Adjustments
(+1.0 each): No Sidewalk
(N); On Major
Arterial/Highway (H)
Initial
2024
Rank &
Score
2021
Rank &
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
1
9.420 N, H 5
7.420
1
7.433 HARVEY ROAD WEST 1 TEXAS AVE DARTMOUTH ST 0.67 B 1,347,622$
North side of street, construction
funding available through MPO;
existing sidewalk along south side of
street; LMI area
2
9.124 H 1
8.124
n/a
0.000 TEXAS AVE LINCOLN AVE UNIVERSITY DR E 0.32 B 641,567$ East side of street; would replace
existing sidewalk; LMI area
3
9.057 N, H 6
7.057
5
8.103 WELLBORN ROAD 1 GEORGE BUSH DR LUTHER ST 0.40 A 800,861$
Portion near George Bush Dr to be
constructed w/ Bush/Wellborn grade
separation project; LMI area
4
9.000 N, H 7b
7.000
2
7.433 HARVEY ROAD WEST 2 MUNSON AVE SH 6 0.57 B 1,143,288$
North side of street, funding available
through MPO; existing sidewalk along
south side of street; LMI area
5
8.427 H 4
7.427
16
7.527
UNIVERSITY DRIVE
EAST TEXAS AVE LINCOLN AVE 1.13 B 2,260,847$ South side of street, would replace
existing sidewalk; LMI area
6
8.000 N, H 15b
6.000
7
6.298
WILLIAM D. FITCH
PARKWAY 1 BARRON RD GRAHAM RD 0.82 C 1,648,130$ No existing bike/ped facilities along
roadway; LMI area
7
7.943 N, H 17
5.943
6
6.298 TEXAS AVENUE HARVEY MITCHELL
PKWY DEACON DR 0.69 B 1,383,295$ No existing bike/ped facilities along
roadway; LMI area
8
7.575 H 11
6.575
23
5.784
RAYMOND STOTZER
PARKWAY 2 WELLBORN RD HARVEY MITCHELL
PKWY 1.06 A 2,123,485$ Would replace existing sidewalk; LMI
area
9
7.551 N, H 22
5.551
8
6.298
WILLIAM D. FITCH
PARKWAY 1A SH 6 BARRON RD 2.17 C 4,335,629$ No existing bike/ped facilities along
roadway
10
7.467
2
7.467
13
0.000
SOUTHWEST PKWY
SOUTHSIDE 5 WELLBORN RD SOUTHWEST PARK 0.10 A 193,905$ Would replace existing sidewalk; LMI
area
11
7.454
3
7.454
17
0.000
SOUTHWEST PKWY
NORTHSIDE 3 WELLBORN RD WELSH AVE 0.54 A 1,075,413$ Would replace existing sidewalk; LMI
area
12
7.308 H 13
6.308
19
7.202 ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD 3 WELLBORN RD
BRIAN BACHMANN
PARK CONNECTOR 2 0.80 C 1,595,091$ South side of street, would replace
existing sidewalk
13
7.172 H 14
6.172
20
7.000 ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD 2 BRIAN BACHMANN
CONNECTOR 2 NORMAND DR 0.52 C 1,047,227$ South side of street, would replace
existing sidewalk
14a
7.000 N, H 25f
5.000
9
5.128 HARVEY ROAD EAST 1 SUMMIT CROSSING
LANE SH 6 1.47 B 2,947,389$
HIGH PRIORITY
MEDIUM PRIORITY
1
Page 23 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Shared Use Path Projects: Along Street ROW
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score Adjustments
(+1.0 each): No Sidewalk
(N); On Major
Arterial/Highway (H)
Initial
2024
Rank &
Score
2021
Rank &
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
14b
7.000 N 15a
6.000
3
6.000 TARROW STREET AUTUMN CIRCLE BRYAN CITY LIMIT 0.03 B 54,765$ City of Bryan has designed extension
along 29th Street; LMI area
14c
7.000
7a
7.000
17
0.000
SOUTHWEST PKWY
NORTHSIDE 1 WELSH AVE BEE CREEK TRAIL 0.83 A 1,662,414$ Would replace existing sidewalk; LMI
area
14d
7.000
7c
7.000
18
0.000
SOUTHWEST PKWY
SOUTHSIDE 2 SOUTHWEST PARK WELSH AVE 0.40 A 793,392$ Would replace existing sidewalk; LMI
area
18
6.869
10
6.869
8
0.000
SOUTHWEST PKWY
SOUTHSIDE 3 WELSH AVE BEE CREEK TRAIL 0.84 A 1,677,303$ Would replace existing sidewalk; LMI
area
19
6.731 H 18
5.731
24
5.634 GEORGE BUSH DRIVE HARVEY MITCHELL
PKWY WELLBORN RD 1.25 A 2,493,643$ North side of street, would replace
existing sidewalk; LMI area
20
6.713 H 19
5.713
21
6.425 ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD 1 NORMAND DR LONGMIRE DR 0.32 C 643,910$ South side of street, would replace
existing sidewalk
21
6.649 N, H 32
4.649
19
5.128 HARVEY ROAD EAST 2 FM 158 ASCEND LANE 0.70 B 1,396,655$ LMI area
22
6.617 N 20
5.617
10
4.816 F&B HARVEY MITCHELL
PKWY TURKEY CREEK RD 0.52 A 1,043,516$
23
6.507
12
6.507
17
0.000
SOUTHWEST PKWY
NORTHSIDE 4 BEE CREEK TRAIL DARTMOUTH ST 0.82 B, A 1,640,790$ Would replace existing sidewalk; LMI
area
24
6.052 N, H 35
4.052
11
4.000
RAYMOND STOTZER
PARKWAY 1
HARVEY MITCHELL
PKWY TURKEY CREEK RD 0.36 A 723,219$
25
6.000 N 25e
5.000
n/a
5.908 WOODLAKE DR VICTORIA AVE GREENS PRARIE RD 0.52 C 1,032,723$
26
5.660 N 31
4.660
n/a
5.000 VICTORIA AVE WELLBORN RD WOODLAKE DR 0.71 C 1,418,286$
27
5.632 N 33
4.632
n/a
0.000 MCCULLOUGH RD WELLBORN RD
BREWSTER DR
EXTENSION 0.48 C 963,144$
28
5.607
21
5.607
17
0.000
SOUTHWEST PKWY
NORTHSIDE 2 DARTMOUTH ST SH 6 0.66 B 1,318,869$ Would replace existing sidewalk; LMI
area
29
5.485
23
5.485
18
0.000
SOUTHWEST PKWY
SOUTHSIDE 4 DARTMOUTH ST SH 6 0.65 B 1,307,025$ Would replace existing sidewalk; LMI
area
30
5.290 N, H 36
3.290
12
3.592
WILLIAM D. FITCH
PARKWAY 2 ROCK PRAIRIE RD CARTER'S CREEK 0.91 D, B 1,814,054$
31
5.098
24
5.098
25
5.067 LONGMIRE DRIVE ROCK PRAIRIE RD GRAHAM RD 0.35 C 696,604$ Would be upgrade to existing bike lane
and sidewalk
32a
5.000
25a
5.000
22
6.077 ARNOLD ROAD BRIAN BACHMANN
PARK CONNECTOR 1 ARNOLD RD TRAIL 0.12 C 242,743$ Along edge of Brian Bachman Park,
Arnold Road ROW
LOW PRIORITY
2
Page 24 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Shared Use Path Projects: Along Street ROW
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score Adjustments
(+1.0 each): No Sidewalk
(N); On Major
Arterial/Highway (H)
Initial
2024
Rank &
Score
2021
Rank &
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
32b
5.000
25c
5.000
4
6.000 SPRING CREEK 3 SOCO APTS SPRING CREEK 2 0.08 C 160,510$ Along Arrington Rd; would replace
existing sidewalk
32c
5.000
25d
5.000
14
6.000
PEBBLE CREEK
PARKWAY LICK CREEK TRAIL ROYAL ADELADE DR 0.59 D 1,174,062$ Along Pebble Creek Pkwy; would
replace existing sidewalk
32d
5.000
25b
5.000
15
6.000 ALEXANDRIA AVENUE SOUTHERN
PLANTATION DR SPRING CREEK 4 0.33 C 661,047$
Path along Southern Oaks Park &
Alexandria Ave; connects to future
Spring Creek trails
36
4.328
34
4.328
18
0.000
SOUTHWEST PKWY
SOUTHSIDE 1 BEE CREEK TRAIL DARTMOUTH ST 0.82 B, A 1,631,071$ Would replace existing sidewalk; LMI
area
3
Page 25 of 37
nmnm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
14b
32b
10
32a
21
2
20
32d
31
24
14d
3
27
25
22
13
11
4
32c
29
28
1
7
26
12
36
23
6
14c
18
30
8
5
19
14a
9
HOLLEMANDRS
BARRO
N RDUNIVERSITY DR EWEL
L
BO
R
N
R
D
N
W VILLA
MARI
A RD
H O LLEM A N D RETA
R
R
O
W
S
T
SOUTHWESTPWHOLLEMAN D R WWEL
L
B
O
R
N
R
D E 29TH
ST
CO
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
SOUTHWEST P
W EWELS
H
AV
TE
X
A
S
A
V
S
E
A
R
L
RUDD
E
R
FW
S
C
A
V
I
T
T
A
V
UNIVERSITY
D
R
DART
M
O
UTH
STGROESBECK STLINCOLN AV
ANDERSONSTE VILLA MARIA RDS
CO
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
HOLLEM ANDRE BROOKSI
DE DR
N
EA
R
L
R
U
DD
E
R
FW
GEORGE BUSH DR W
S T
E
X
A
S
A
V
VI
C
T
O
R
I
A
A
VFINFEATHER RDCAPSTONE
D
RRAYMOND STOTZER P
W HARVEY RDLEONARD RD
AR
R
ING
TON
RD
TE
X
A
S
A
V
GEORGEBUSH DRGREENSPRAIRIERDFM
2
1
5
4
N
H
A
R
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
P
W
H
A
R
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
PW
S
ROCK PRA
I
R
I
E
R
D
W
O
O
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
FM 1
5
8
SH 30BRIARCREST DR
SH
6
S WILLIAMDFITCHPWRIVERSIDEPW
RAYMOND STOTZER T
O
R
I
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
P
W
nm
GLADESTDOMINIK DRSOUTH
WOOD
DR KRENEK TAP RDCOLGATEDRG
E
O
R
G
E
BU
SH
D
R
E
HARVEY RD
ANDERSON ST
H O LLEM AN DREEA
R
L
RU
DD
ER
FW
S
SOUTHWEST P
W SOUTHW ESTPW EHOLLEM
A
N
D
R
TE
X
A
S
A
V
S
HARVEYM ITCHELLPW SDARTM
O
UTHST
718
14c
1
29
28
36
23
¯0 10.5
Miles
Unfunded Shared Use Path (Along Street ROW)
Project Priorities February 2024
Prioritization Category
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
nm Schools
Parks
A
A
Page 26 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Shared Use Path Projects: Off-Street Paths
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score Adjustments
(+1.0 each): Existing
Facilities Connection (F);
City-Owned
Property/Easement (P)
Initial
2024
Rank &
Score
2021
Rank &
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
1
9.000 F, P 2b
7.000
8
7.187
JOHN CROMPTON
PARK CONNECTOR HOLLEMAN DR W JONES BUTLER RD 0.39 A 780,525$ Crosses existing City park property;
LMI area
2
8.240 F, P 6
6.240
9
7.000 BEE CREEK 2 HARVEY MITCHELL
PKWY BEE CREEK PARK 0.57 A 1,146,797$ Path likely accomodated with existing
City property and parkland; LMI area
3
8.161 F 1
7.161
23
6.984 WOLF PEN CREEK GEORGE BUSH DR E TEXAS AVE 0.24 B 489,438$ Requires acquisition of access
easements; LMI area
4
8.129 F, P 5
6.129
10
7.000
BRIAN BACHMANN
PARK CONNECTOR 2 ROCK PRAIRIE RD ARNOLD RD TRAIL 0.23 C 457,403$ Crosses existing City park property
5a
8.000 F 2a
7.000
7
7.975
LEMON TREE PARK
CONNECTOR GLADE ST LEMON TREE PARK
TRAIL 0.10 A 197,375$ Requires acquisition of access
easements; LMI area
5b
8.000 F, P 7b
6.000
11
6.389
BRIAN BACHMANN
PARK CONNECTOR 1 ROCK PRAIRIE RD ARNOLD RD 0.23 C, A 455,372$ Crosses existing City park property
5c
8.000 F 2c
7.000
4
7.351 BEE CREEK TRIB B HOLLEMAN DR SOUTHLAND ST 0.26 A 525,116$ Requires acquisition of access
easements; LMI area
8
7.030 F, P 16
5.030
2
6.000 SPRING CREEK 4 BRIDGEWATER DR SOCO APTS 0.21 C 410,441$ TPWD grant application to be
submitted this year
29
4.810 F 33
3.810
6
4.159
GULF STATES UTILITY
EASEMENT 1 BRYAN CITY LIMIT SOUTHERN POINT
PKWY 8.18 D, B 16,355,828$ Consists of length of Gulf States trail
in City limits
9a
7.000 F, P 17c
5.000
15
5.000 BEE CREEK TRIB 3 DARTMOUTH ST CENTRAL PARK 0.23 B 463,066$ Located on property owned by City;
LMI area
9b
7.000 F, P 17d
5.000
17
5.252 SPRING CREEK 1 SH 6 LICK CREEK TRAIL 1.29 C, D 2,577,765$ Located on property owned by City
9c
7.000 F, P 17f
5.000
12
6.000 SPRING CREEK 2 SH 6 S ARRINGTON RD 0.37 C 748,426$ Existing 30' wide public access
easement
9d
7.000 F 7c
6.000
n/a
0.000
BILLY MADELY PARK
TRL 1 COONER ST BILLY MADELY PARK 0.10 B 198,011$
Requires acquisition of access
easements, provides access to City
park currently only accessible from
City of Bryan; LMI area
9e
7.000 P 7e
6.000
14
5.000
STEPHEN C. BEACHY
CENTRAL PARK
CONNECTOR
SH 6 CENTRAL PARK 0.08 B 158,822$
Located on property owned by City;
connects to future path to be
constructed as part of TxDOT SH 6
project; LMI area
9f
7.000 P 7d
6.000
18
6.000
SPRING CREEK
WOODLAND HILLS
CONNECTOR
WOODLAND HILLS
PARK
SPRING CREEK
CONNECTOR 0.09 D 174,038$
MEDIUM PRIORITY
HIGH PRIORITY
1
Page 27 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Shared Use Path Projects: Off-Street Paths
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Adjusted
2024
Rank &
Score
Score Adjustments
(+1.0 each): Existing
Facilities Connection (F);
City-Owned
Property/Easement (P)
Initial
2024
Rank &
Score
2021
Rank &
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Sidewalk
Zone
Conceptual
Cost
Estimate Notes
15
6.966 F 13
5.966
28
6.219 SPRING CREEK 7 REATTA MEADOWS
PARK VICTORIA AVE 0.28 C 561,656$ Requires acquisition of access
easements
16
6.783 F 14
5.783
29
6.053 SPRING CREEK 8 VICTORIA AVE SONOMA PARK 0.42 C 833,166$ Requires acquisition of access
easements
17
6.707 F 15
5.707
22
6.171 LICK CREEK 1 LONGMIRE DR
HIBISCUS ST ROW
TRAIL 0.84 C 1,672,263$
18a
6.000
7a
6.000
24
6.588
UNIVERSITY DRIVE
CONNECTOR UNIVERSITY DR E SHADY DR 0.17 B 332,653$ Requires acquisition of access
easements; LMI area
18b
6.000 P 17a
5.000
19
5.636
SPRING CREEK
CONNECTOR
SPRING MEADOWS
SUBDIVISION SPRING CREEK TRAIL 1 0.18 D 350,938$
18c
6.000 F 17b
5.000
1
6.000 SPRING CREEK 6 REATTA MEADOWS
PARK BRIDGEWATER DR 0.29 C 580,066$
18d
6.000 P 17h
5.000
21
5.000
SWITCH STATION
ROAD CONNECTOR APPOMATTOX DR GULF STATES TRAIL 0.21 B 429,749$
18e
6.000
7f
6.000
5
5.000
APPOMATTOX DRIVE
CONNECTOR HORSE HAVEN LN APPOMATTOX DR 0.15 B 298,135$
23
5.964 F 26
4.964
16
6.811
WOLF PEN CREEK
CONNECTOR POST OAK MALL WOLF PEN CREEK
TRAIL 0.08 B 160,246$ Requires acquisition of access
easements; LMI area
24
5.591 F 28
4.591
27
4.405 LICK CREEK 2 HUNTINGTON APTS LICK CREEK TRAIL 0.66 D 1,326,972$
25a
5.000
17e
5.000
3
6.000 SPRING CREEK 5 SOUTHERN OAKS PARK SPRING CREEK 6 0.24 C 477,685$ Located on City park/greenway
25b
5.000
17g
5.000
30
6.000 SPRING CREEK TRIB 7 WILLIAM D FITCH
PKWY SPRING CREEK 6 0.43 C 857,435$ To be constructed by private
development
25c
5.000
17i
5.000
20
5.000
GULF STATES UTILITY
EASEMENT
CONNECTOR
HORSE HAVEN
SUBDIVSION GULF STATES TRAIL 0.09 B 186,968$ Potential to break project into phases
25d
5.000 F 30c
4.000
26
4.557 LICK CREEK TRIB 10 MIDTOWN RESERVE
SUBDIVISION LICK CREEK TRIB 11 1 0.31 D 626,772$
30
4.712
27
4.712
25
5.172 ALUM CREEK TRIB 1 LAKEWAY DR ALUM CREEK TRAIL 0.99 D 1,972,227$
31
4.504
29
4.504
13
5.056 BEE CREEK 1 SH 6 GULF STATES TRAIL 0.79 B 1,582,779$
32a
4.000
30a
4.000
32
4.000 ALUM CREEK TRIB 4 NANTUCKET DR
EXTENSION ALUM CREEK TRAIL 0.37 D 731,191$
32b
4.000
30b
4.000
31
4.730 ALUM CREEK SH 6
PEBBLE CREEK PKWY
EXTENSION 1.16 D 2,311,610$
34
3.000
34
3.000
33
3.038 ALUM CREEK TRIB 2 LICK CREEK PARK
PEBBLE CREEK PKWY
EXTENSION 1.07 D 2,144,977$
LOW PRIORITY
2
Page 28 of 37
nmnm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
HOLLEMANDRS
BARRO
N RDUNIVERSITY DR EWEL
L
BO
R
N
R
D
N
W VILLA
MARI
A RDTARROW STSOUT
H
W
E
S
T
P
W
HOLLEMAN D R WWEL
L
B
O
R
N
R
D E 29TH
ST
CO
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
WELS
H
AV
TE
X
A
S
A
V
S
E
A
R
L
RUDD
E
R
FW
S
C
A
V
I
T
T
A
V
HOLLEMAN DR E
UNIVERSITY
D
R
DA
R
T
M
O
U
T
H
S
TGROESBECK STLINCOLN AV
ANDERSONST SOUTH
WEST P
W EE VILLA MARIA RDS
CO
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
HOLLEM ANDRE BROOKSI
DE DR
N
EA
R
L
R
U
DD
E
R
FW
GEORGE B
USH DR
W
S T
E
X
A
S
A
V
VI
C
T
O
R
I
A
A
VFINFEATHER RDCAPSTONE
D
RRAYMOND STOTZER P
W HARVEY RDLEONARD RD
AR
R
ING
TON
RD
TE
X
A
S
A
V
GEORGEBUSH DRGREENSPRAIRIERDFM
2
1
5
4
N
H
A
R
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
P
W
H
A
R
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
PW
S
ROCK PRA
I
R
I
E
R
D
W
O
O
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
SH 30BRIARCREST DR
SH
6
S
FM 15
8
WILLIAMDFITCHPWRIVERSIDEPW
RAYMOND STOTZER T
O
R
I
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
P
W
9e
23
17a
25c
5a
9d
17f
17b
17c
8
17e
5b
4
9a
25a
3
5c
14 17d
25d
32a
9c
1
15 25b
29
2
24
31
16
30 34
32b
9b
29
29
¯0 10.5
Miles
Unfunded Shared Use Path (Off-Street)
Project Priorities February 2024
Prioritization Category
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
nm Schools
Parks
Page 29 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Bicycle Facility Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Rank
2024
GIS
Score
2021
GIS
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Street
Classification
Speed
Limit
Housing
or On-
Street
Parking?
Asphalt or
Concrete? Notes
1 8.000 7.900 STALLINGS DR 1 DOMINIK DR
UNIVERSITY OAKS
BLVD 0.15 Minor Collector 30 P (one side) A Sidewalk on one side (west)
2 7.685 7.061 DOMINIK DR TEXAS AVE S MUNSON AVE 0.79 Major Collector 35 H, P A
Fills gap between existing bike lane on
George Bush and bike route on
Munson; sidewalk on one side (south)
3 7.260 7.512 NAGLE ST INLOW BLVD CHURCH AVE 0.28 Minor Collector 25 H, P A
Bike route currently; incomplete
sidewalk network/significant gaps
4 7.169 7.256 UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD GEORGE BUSH DR S SH 6 FRONTAGE RD W 1.19 Minor Collector 30 H,P A
Incomplete sidewalk
network/intermittent gaps
5 7.058 7.328 HOLLEMAN DR WEST MARION PUGH DR
HARVEY MITCHELL
PKWY S 0.62 Minor Collector 35 H A
Bike route currently; fills gap between
existing bike lane and shared use path
6a 7.000 7.960 TIMBER ST GEORGE BUSH DR PARK PL 0.33 Minor Collector 30 H A
Partially within School Zone (Oakwood
Intermediate Elementary / College View
High School); connects to existing bike
lane on George Bush
6b 7.00 8.000 GLADE ST 2 PARK PL HOLLEMAN DR 0.36 Minor Collector 30 H, P A
Bike route currently; sidewalk on one
side (west)
8 6.974 6.915 SCARLETT OHARA DR
UNIVERSITY OAKS
BLVD HARVEY RD 0.16 Minor Collector 30 A
Does not connect to any existing
bike/ped facilities
9 6.937 7.707 MUNSON AVE GILCHRIST AVE HARVEY RD 0.36 Minor Collector 30 A
Bike route currently; sidewalk on one
side (west, most of segment); fills gap
between existing shared use path on
Harvey and bike route on Gilchrist
10 6.440 0.000 ANDERSON ST SOUTHWEST PKWY BEE CREEK 0.32 Local 30 A
Fills gap between existing bike lane on
Anderson and shared use path in Bee
Creek Park
11 6.379 7.014 BRENTWOOD DRIVE DARTMOUTH ST ANDERSON ST 0.74 Major Collector 30 H, P A
Fills gap between existing bike lanes on
Dartmouth and Anderson; sidewalks on
both sides (most of segment)
12 6.348 7.290 SPRING LOOP TARROW ST UNIVERSITY DR E 0.60 Major Collector 35 H, P A
Bike route currently; sidewalks on both
sides
HIGH PRIORITY
1
Page 30 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Bicycle Facility Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Rank
2024
GIS
Score
2021
GIS
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Street
Classification
Speed
Limit
Housing
or On-
Street
Parking?
Asphalt or
Concrete? Notes
13 6.008 6.259 NEWPORT LN EAGLE AVE
SOUTHERN
PLANTATION DR 0.72 Minor Collector 30 A
Sidewalks on both sides; connects to
existing bike lanes on Eagle and Barron
14 6.003 6.557 NAVARRO DR WELLBORN RD WELSH AVE 0.58 Minor Collector 30 H (few) A
Sidewalks on both sides; connects to
existing bike lane on Welsh
15a 6.000 5.656 BROTHERS BLVD TEXAS AVE S LONGMIRE DR 0.25 Minor Collector 30 A Sidewalk on one side (north)
15b 6.000 7.118 DEACON DR 1 RIO GRANDE BLVD BROTHERS BLVD 0.30 Minor Collector 35 H, P A
Partially within School Zone
(Southwood Valley Elementary); fills
gap between existing bike lanes on Rio
Grande and Deacon; sidewalks on both
sides
15c 6.000 6.308 GENERAL PARKWAY 2
140 FT NW OF CAPPS
DR ROCK PRARIE RD W 0.26 Minor Collector 30 H, P A
Fills gap between existing bike lanes on
Rock Prairie and General Parkway;
sidewalks on both sides
15d 6.000 6.046 GLENHAVEN DR UNIVERSITY DR E DOMINIK DR 0.57 Major Collector 30 H (few) A
Fills gap between existing shared use
path on University and bike route on
Dominik; sidewalks on both sides
15e 6.000 7.000 RIO GRANDE BLVD 80 FT SE OF GAIL PL PONDEROSA DR 0.17 Major Collector 35 A
Fills gap between existing bike lanes on
Rio Grande; sidewalks on both sides
15f 6.000 6.951 SCHAFFER ROAD
160 FT NW OF
BOUGAINVILLEA ST GRAHAM RD 0.38 Minor Collector 35 A
Fills gap between existing bike
lane/shared use path on Arnold and
bike lane on Eagle
21 5.987 6.444 ALEXANDRIA AVE GRAHAM RD
SOUTHERN
PLANTATION DR 1.12 Minor Collector 30 A Sidewalks on both sides
22 5.529 6.000 DECATUR DR BARRON RD
150 FT SE OF
ALEXANDRIA AVE 0.65 Major Collector 30 A
Fills gap between existing bike lanes on
Barron and Decatur
23 5.458 5.720
SOUTHERN PLANTATION
DR 2 SAN MAR DR SH 6 FRONTAGE RD W 0.96 Minor Collector 30 H, P A
Terminates at SH 6 (without crossing
opportunity) and dead-end (street to be
projected with future development)
24 5.298 6.000 CASTLE ROCK PW 1
630 FT W OF ROCKY
CREEK TR
50 FT N OF WILLIAM
D FITCH PKWY 0.41 Minor Collector 30 A
Sidewalks on both sides; terminates at
dead-end
25 5.201 6.100 CASTLEGATE DR VICTORIA AVE GREENS PRARIE RD 0.86 Minor Collector 30 H (one side) A
Shared use path on one side (north);
connects to existing bike on Victoria
MEDIUM PRIORITY
2
Page 31 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Bicycle Facility Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Rank
2024
GIS
Score
2021
GIS
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Street
Classification
Speed
Limit
Housing
or On-
Street
Parking?
Asphalt or
Concrete? Notes
26 5.125 6.000 SPEARMAN DR 2 150 FT N OF FORE CT ST ANDREWS DR 0.47 Minor Collector 30 A Sidewalks on both sides
27 5.082 6.000 LAKEWAY DR 2 AGATE DR VENTURE DR 0.22 Major Collector 35 A
Bike route currently; sidewalks on both
sides
28 5.015 6.000 PARKVIEW DR LAKEWAY DR SPEARMAN DR 0.38 Minor Collector 30 A
Partially within School Zone (Pebble
Creek Elementary); sidewalks on both
sides
29 5.013 5.108 BIRMINGHAM RD NORMAND DR SH 6 FRONTAGE RD W 0.37 Minor Collector 30 P (one side) A
Sidewalks on both sides (most the
length of the segment); recurring
truck/trailer parking
30a 5.000 5.017 CORSAIR DR EMERALD PKWY PAVILION AVE 0.32 Minor Collector 30 A Sidewalks on both sides
30b 5.000 5.000 CREEK MEADOW BLVD 2 CREEK MEADOW
BLVD N
COTTONWOOD
CREEK LN 0.32 Minor Collector 30 A Sidewalks on both sides
30c 5.000 5.660 APPOMATTOX DR 1 HARVEY RD SWITCH STATION RD 0.40 Minor Collector 30 A
Sidewalks on both sides; connects to
bike lanes between Horse Shoe and
Switch Station
30d 5.000 5.000 CREEK MEADOW BLVD 1 VICTORIA AVE
CREEK MEADOW
BLVD N 0.58 Minor Collector 30 A Sidewalks on both sides
30e 5.000 5.000 PAVILION AV 1 CORSAIR DR SEBESTA RD 0.12 Minor Collector 30 A
Sidewalks on both sides; connects to
existing bike lane on Sebesta
35 4.955 5.377 EMERALD PKWY 290 FT E OF SH 6 ROSEWOOD DR 0.30
Major Collector /
Minor Arterial 35 A
Bike route currently; sidewalks on both
sides
36 4.409 5.000 NORTH FOREST PKWY 1 SH 6 FRONTAGE RD E APPOMATTOX DR 0.50 Minor Collector 35 A
Sidewalks on both sides; terminates at
SH 6 (without crossing opportunity)
37a 4.000 5.000 APPOMATTOX DR 4 PALM CT NORTH FOREST PKWY 0.17 Minor Collector 30 A Sidewalks on both sides
37b 4.000 5.106 STONEBROOK DR CONCORD CIR ROCK PRARIE RD 0.57 Minor Collector 30 H, P A Sidewalk on one side (west)
37c 4.000 4.956 WOODCREEK DR WHITNEY LN FONTAINE DR 0.05 Minor Collector 30 H A
Fills gap (small/~265') between existing
bike route and bike lane on Woodcreek
37d 4.000 5.000 APPOMATTOX DR 5 NORTH FOREST PKWY EMERALD PKWY 0.68 Minor Collector 30 A
Sidewalk on one side (east); terminates
at dead-end (street to be projected with
future development)
LOW PRIORITY
3
Page 32 of 37
nmnm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
HOLLEMANDRS
BARRO
N RDUNIVERSITY DR EWEL
L
BO
R
N
R
D
N
W VILLA
MARI
A RDTARROW STH O LLEM A N D RESOUT
H
W
E
S
T
P
W
HOLLEMAN DR WWEL
L
B
O
R
N
R
D E 29TH
ST
CO
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
WELS
H
AV
TE
X
A
S
A
V
S
E
A
R
L
RUDD
E
R
FW
S
C
A
V
I
T
T
A
V
UNIVERSITY
D
R
DART
M
O
UTH
STGROESBECK STLINCOLN AV
ANDERSONST SOUTH
WEST P
W EE VILLA MARIA RDS
CO
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
HOLLE
MAN
DRE BROOKSI
DE DR
N
EA
R
L
R
U
DD
E
R
FW
GEORGE B
USH DR
W
S T
E
X
A
S
A
V
VI
C
T
O
R
I
A
A
VFINFEATHER RDCAPSTONE
D
RRAYMOND STOTZER P
W HARVEY RDLEONARD RD
AR
R
ING
TON
RD
TE
X
A
S
A
V
GEORGEBUSH DRGREENSPRAIRIERDFM
2
1
5
4
N
H
A
R
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
P
W
H
A
R
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
PW
S
ROCK PRA
I
R
I
E
R
D
W
O
O
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
SH 30BRIARCREST DR
SH
6
S
FM 15
8
WILLIAMDFITCHPWRIVERSIDEPW
RAYMOND STOTZER T
O
R
I
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
P
W
9
37c
30e
1
8
37a
15e
27
15a
15c
3
24
15b
3510
30a
30b
6a
6b
29
15f
28
30c
26
36
15d
37b
30d
14
12
5
22
37d
13
11
2
25
23
21
4
¯0 10.5
Miles
Unfunded Bicycle Facility Project
Priorities February 2024
Prioritization Category
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
nm Schools
Parks
Page 33 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Bike Route Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Rank
2024
GIS
Score
2021
GIS
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Street
Classification
Speed
Limit
Housing
or On-
Street
Parking?
Asphalt
or
Concrete
? Notes
1 7.126 8.000 PARK PLACE 2 DEXTER DR TIMBER ST 0.26 Local 30 H, P A Connects to existing bike route on Dexter
2 7.034 7.796 MONTCLAIR AVENUE 1 GEORGE BUSH DR LUTHER ST 0.39 Local 30 H, P A
Connects to existing bike lanes on George
Bush
3 7.006 7.656 STALLINGS DR 2
UNIVERSITY OAKS
BLVD HARVEY RD 0.17 Minor Collector 30 P A Connects to midblock crossing on Harvey
to Wolf Pen Creek Trail; abuts Oaks Park
4a 7.000 7.000 CHERRY ST COLLEGE MAIN ST NAGLE ST 0.16 Minor Collector 25 H, P C
Fills gap between existing bike lanes on
College Main and bike route on Nagle;
sidewalks on both sides
4b 7.000 7.316 CROSS ST NAGLE ST COLLEGE AVE 0.23 Minor Collector 40 H, P A, C
Connects to existing bike route on Nagle;
sidewalks on both sides (one side only on
half of segment)
4c 7.000 7.139 ELEANOR STREET MONTCLAIR AVE HOLLEMAN DR 0.27 Local 30 A
Incomplete sidewalk on one side (west);
connects to existing bike lanes on
Holleman; abuts WA Tarrow Park and the
Lincoln Recreation Center
4d 7.000 7.579 GLADE ST 1 HOLLEMAN DR SOUTHWEST PKWY 0.63 Minor Collector 30 H, P A
Sidewalk on one side (west); connects to
existing bike lanes on Holleman
4e 7.00 7.781 LUTHER ST MONTCLAIR AVE WELSH AVE 0.11 Local 30 H, P A
Sidewalk on one side (south); connects to
existing bike route on Welsh
4f 7.000 7.000 MONTCLAIR AVENUE 2 LUTHER ST ELEANOR ST 0.06 Local 30 H, P A Abuts WA Tarrow Park
4g 7.000 0.000 NIMITZ ST UNIVERSITY DR E COONER ST 0.13 Local 30 H A Incomplete sidewalk on one side (west)
4h 7.000 7.364 WALTON DR NUNN ST GILCHRIST AVE 0.52
Minor Collector
/ Local 30 H, P A
Fills gap between existing bike lanes on
Walton and bike route on Gilchrist
12 6.997 8.000 MAPLE AV FIRST ST WELLBORN RD 0.06 Minor Collector 30 C
Sidewalks on both sides; half of the street
is currently closed for construction staging
13 6.961 7.000 RHETT BUTLER DR
UNIVERSITY OAKS
BLVD HARVEY RD 0.17 Local 30 P A Sidewalk on one side (west)
14 6.487 0.000 COONER ST TEXAS AVE END OF COONER ST 0.37 Local 30 H, P A
Connects to funded shared use path on
Texas; incomplete sidewalk
network/intermittent gaps
15 6.230 6.987 AUTUMN CIRCLE TARROW ST SPRING LO 0.47 Local 30 H, P A Sidewalk on one side (south)
HIGH PRIORITY
1
Page 34 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Bike Route Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Rank
2024
GIS
Score
2021
GIS
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Street
Classification
Speed
Limit
Housing
or On-
Street
Parking?
Asphalt
or
Concrete
? Notes
16a 6.000 6.178 COLGATE DR DARTMOUTH ST EASTMARK DR 0.45
Minor Collector
/ Local 30 H, P A
Fills gap between bike lanes on Dartmouth
and Central Park Lane; abuts Wolf Pen
Creek Park
16b 6.000 6.000 BRANDENBURG LANE EAGLE AVE GRAHAM RD 0.44 Minor Collector 30 A
Fills gap between existing bike lanes on
Graham and Eagle; sidewalks on both sides
16c 6.000 7.000 EDELWEISS AVE WELSH AVE ROCK PRARIE RD 0.41 Minor Collector 30 P A
Partially within School Zone (Rock Prairie
Elementary); connects to existing bike
lanes on Welsh; sidewalks on both sides;
abuts Jack & Dorothy Miller Park
16d 6.000 6.375 NORMAND DRIVE 2 PONDEROSA DR ROCK PRAIRIE RD 0.21 Minor Collector 30 H, P A
Fills gap between existing bike route on
Ponderosa and bike lane on Normand;
siderwalk on one side (east)
16e 6.000 6.015 SHADY DR END OF SHADY DR FRANCIS DR 0.15 Local 30 H, P A
Connects to existing bike route on Francis;
terminates at dead end (with projection to
future shared use path)
21 5.700 5.281 BRIDLE GATE DR LONGMIRE DR SH 6 FRONTAGE RD W 0.21 Minor Collector 30 A
Sidewalks on both sides; connects to
existing bike lanes on Longmire; terminates
at SH 6 (w/o crossing)
22 5.647 6.000 EASTMARK DRIVE
START OF EASTMARK
DR SOUTHWEST PKWY E 0.22 Local 30 A Sidewalks on both sides; connects to
shared use path in Wolf Pen Creek Park
23 5.063 6.000 ALEXANDRIA AVE 1
SOUTHERN
PLANTATION DR DECATUR DR 0.49 Minor Colelctor 30 H, P A
Sidewalks on both sides; connects to
existing bike lanes on Decatur; abuts
Southern Oaks Park
24a 5.000 5.000 HORSEHAVEN LN APPOMATTOX DR HORSEBACK DR 0.04 Local 30 H, P A
Fills gap between existing bike lane on
Appomattox and shred use path on Hordse
Haven; sidewalks on both sides
24b 5.000 5.000 APPOMATTOX DR 3
END OF
APPOMATTOX DR RAINTREE DR 0.08 Local 30 H, P A
Sidewalk on one side (west); terminates at
dead end (with projection to future shared
use path)
24c 5.000 5.956 ARRINGTON RD 2 DECATUR DR SH 6 FRONTAGE RD W 0.25 Major Collector 35 A
Sidewalks on both sides; connects to
existing bike lanes on Decatur and
Arrington; terminates at SH 6 (w/o
crossing)
MEDIUM PRIORITY
2
Page 35 of 37
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan
Stand-Alone Bike Route Projects
Draft Prioritization February 2024
Rank
2024
GIS
Score
2021
GIS
Score
BPG
Board
Priority Street From To Miles
Street
Classification
Speed
Limit
Housing
or On-
Street
Parking?
Asphalt
or
Concrete
? Notes
24d 5.000 5.000 BACKWATER LN
CREEK MEADOW
BLVD N ROYDER RD 0.08 Local 30 A Sidewalk on one side (west); connects to
existing bike lanes on Royder Rd
243 5.000 5.000 CREEK MEADOW BLVD 3 BACK WATER RD
CREEK MEADOW
BLVD N 0.11 Local 30 A Sidewalks on both sides
24f 5.000 6.000 MISSION RANCH DR GREAT OAKS DR FEATHER RUN 0.23 Local 30 C Partially within rural tfare context zone
24g 5.000 5.000 GREAT OAKS DR ARBOLEDA DR ROCK PRARIE RD W 0.76 Local 30 H A Rural tfare context zone
24h 5.000 5.000 SPEARMAN DR ST ANDREWS DR PEBBLE CREEK PKWY 0.40 Minor Collector 30 H (few) A
Connects to existing bike lanes on Pebble
Creek; sidewalks on both sides
32 4.894 5.000
COTTONWOOD CREEK
LN
CREEK MEADOW
BLVD N WILD CREEK CT 0.21 Local 30 H (one) A Sidewalks on both sides; laydown curb
along street
33 4.840 5.207 OLD ROYDER RD ROYDER RD VICTORIA AVE 0.16 Local 30 A, C
Connects to existing bike lanes on Royder;
abuts Wellborn Community Center
34 4.766 5.732 ST ANDREWS DR SPEARMAN DR PEBBLE CREEK PKWY 1.05 Minor Collector 30 A
Connects to existing shared use path on
Pebble Creek and into Lick Creek Park;
sidewalks on both sides
35 4.441 5.000 WILD CREEK CT
COTTONWOOD
CREEK LN
END OF WILD CREEK
CT 0.16 Local 30 H, P A Sidewalks on both sides
36a 4.000 4.721 FOXFIRE DR 2 STONEBROOK DR FROST DR 0.46 Minor Collector 30 H A Rural tfare context zone
36b 4.000 4.900 NANTUCKET DR HARPER'S FERRY RD SH 6 FRONTAGE RD W 0.36 Local 30 H A
Rural tfare context zone; terminates at SH
6 (with future extension to the east
projected)
36c 4.000 4.419 RAINTREE DRIVE 1 WILDERNESS DR S FOREST OAKS DR 0.15 Minor Collector 30 H, P A
Connects to existing bike routes on
Wilderness and Dexter; abuts Carter's
Crossing Park
36d 4.000 4.624 RAINTREE DRIVE 2 APPOMATTOX DR FOREST OAKS DR 0.13 Minor Collector 30 H, P A Sidewalks on both sides
36e 4.000 5.720 SANDSTONE DR EMERALD PKWY SEBESTA RD 0.12 Minor Collector 30 H (one) A Connects to existing bike lanes on Emerald
36f 4.000 5.000 SHADWOCREST DR STONEBROOK DR WOODCREEK DR 0.31 Local 30 H, P A Abuts Woodcreek Park
42 3.153 4.000 FROST DR FOXFIRE DR BIRD POND RD 0.83 Minor Collector 30 H A Rural tfare context zone
43 2.459 2.851 BIRD POND RD 2 BIRD POND RD STRAND LN 1.04 Local 40 A
Partially within the ETJ; rural tfare context
zone
LOW PRIORITY
3
Page 36 of 37
nmnm
nm
nm nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
HOLLEMANDRS
BARRO
N RDUNIVERSITY DR EW VILLA
MARI
A RDTARROW STH O LLEM A N D RESOUT
H
W
E
S
T
P
W
HOLLEMAN D R WWEL
L
B
O
R
N
R
D E 29TH
ST
COLLEGE
AV
WELS
H
AV
TE
X
A
S
A
V
SEAR
L
RUDDE
R
FW
S
C
A
V
I
T
T
A
V
UNIVERSITY
D
R
DARTM
O
U
TH
STGROESBECK STLINCOLN AV
ANDERSONST SOUT
H
WEST
P
W EE VILLA MARIA RDS
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
HOLLEM ANDRE BROOKSI
DE DR
N
EA
R
L
R
U
D
D
E
R
FW
GEORGE B
USH DR
W
S
T
E
X
A
S
A
V
VI
C
T
O
R
I
A
A
VFINFEATHER RDCAPSTONE
D
RRAYMOND STOTZER P
W HARVEY RDLEONARD RD
AR
R
ING
TON
RD
TE
X
A
S
A
V
GEORGEBUSH DRGREENSPRAIRIERDFM
2
1
5
4
N
H
A
R
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
P
W
H
A
R
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
PW
S
ROCK PRA
I
R
I
E
R
D
W
O
O
D
L
A
K
E
D
R
SH 30BRIARCREST DR
SH
6
S
FM 15
8
WILLIAMDFITCHPWRIVERSIDEPW
RAYMOND STOTZER T
O
R
I
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
P
W
24a
4f
12
24d
24b
243
4e
36e
36d
4g
16e
33
36c
35
4a
13
3
16d
32
21
22
24f
4b
24c
1
4c
36f
36b
14
2
24h
16c
16b
16a
36a
15
23
4h
4d
24g
42
34
43
¯0 10.5
Miles
Unfunded Bicycle Route Project Priorities
February 2024
Prioritization Category
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
nm Schools
Parks
Page 37 of 37