HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/14/2023 - Agenda Packet - Design Review BoardCollege Station, TX
Meeting Agenda
Design Review Board
1101 Texas Ave, College Station, TX 77840
Internet: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-
teams/join-a-meeting
Meeting ID: 221 729 272 279 | Passcode:4nh8wJ
The City Council may or may not attend this meeting.
July 14, 2023 11:00 AM 1938 Executive Conference Room
College Station, TX Page 1
Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location
stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by
videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a third-
party vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting
access and participation will be in-person only.
1.Call meeting to order and consider absence requests.
2.Hear Visitors.
At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to citizens wishing to address issues not already
scheduled on today's agenda. Each citizen’s presentation will be limited to three minutes in order to
allow adequate time for the completion of the agenda items. Comments will be received and city staff
may be asked to look into the matter, or the matter may be placed on a future agenda for discussion.
A recording may be made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.
3.Agenda Items
3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Attachments: 1. September 9, 2022
3.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action to consider a waiver to the Unified Development
Ordinance Section 7.10.C.3.a "Horizontal Façade Articulation" for 1500 Holleman Drive East,
which is zoned WPC Wolf Pen Creek. Case # AWV2023-000012
Sponsors: Jeff Howell
Attachments: 1. Staff Report
2.Applicant’s Supporting Information
3.Applicant's Letter
4.NRA Application Submittal (NRA2023-000005)
5.3D Renderings
4.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
A member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to
a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
5.Adjourn.
Page 1 of 26
Design Review Board
Page 2 July 14, 2023
Adjournment into Executive Session may occur in order to consider any item listed on the agenda if a
matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on July 7, 2023 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting
and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD
at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the
meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification
at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to
provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly
Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire
libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411,
Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad
portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 2 of 26
Minutes
Design Review Board September 9, 2022 City Hall 1938 Executive Conference Room
Board Members Present: Chairperson Jason Cornelius, Board Members Luke Marvel, David Hebert, William McKinney, Susan McGrail and Ivan Rusyn
Board Members Absent: Board Member Ray Holliday
Staff Present:Director of Planning and Development Services Michael Ostrowski, Assistant Director of Planning and Development Services Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner Derrick Williams, Land Development Review Manager Anthony Armstrong, and Staff Assistant Tiffany
Romero
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order.
Chairperson Cornelius called the meeting to order at 11:01 a.m.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.1: Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
•July 25, 2022
Board Member McKinney motioned to approve the minutes. Board Member Marvel
seconded the motion, which passed (5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.2: Presentation, discussion, and possible action to consider a waiver to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 5.8.B.3 "Building Design Considerations for Historic Properties" for 501 University Drive, which is zoned NG-1 Core
Northgate. Case # AWV2022-000012
Staff Planner Williams presented the item to the Board and recommended denial of the request.
Board Member McGrail asked if the location was a single tenant already.
Staff Planner Williams explained this is a single tenant occupancy.
Page 3 of 26
Board Member Hebert asked if they are going to carry the remodel of the façade to the sides of the building.
Applicant Mike Trapnell was available for questions. He said the east and north sides of the
building are painted concrete. He explained the building was built in 1948 or 1949 and that the building was built with steal columns and concrete panels. They were planning to leave the concrete on the east and north sides as is. They are proposing to wrap the façade improvements around the corner on the east side to a depth of four feet, but are not intending to
take the brickwork all the way around the building.
Chairperson Cornelius asked to see the pictures again of the current building.
Board Member Hebert asked to clarify that they were only cladding up to the point where it currently stops on the east side of the building.
Mr. Trapnell said that was correct.
Board Member Rusyn asked why they were investing in the façade improvements.
Mr. Trapnell explained that the building is needing an upgrade and from an energy perspective is not doing well. If they can get the exterior approved they will gut the entire building and bring it up to code. He explained this would be an investment into the community.
Board Member Rusyn asked if there were drawings or renderings of what is being planned for the
interior remodel.
Mr. Trapnell explained their proposal for the interior remodel.
Chairperson Cornelius asked what staff did not approve of for the building.
Staff Planner Williams explained the design.
Assistant Director Hitchcock explained that with the relocation of the doors and windows and the
changes to the materials, there would not be much left of the original building. Staff is
supportive of material changes if the existing door and window locations were preserved.
Mr. Trapnell said with the additional windows they are trying to make the building brighter and more inviting.
Board Member Rusyn asked how the applicant plans on moving the pole with the pedestrian signal.
Mr. Trapnell explained they could move the signal to the bigger light pole further away from the
building, or recess the doors to give the pole a clearance of five feet.
Chairperson Cornelius asked if they are requesting a second door on the side of the building.
Mr. Trapnell said yes.
Page 4 of 26
Board Member Rusyn explained he would have wanted to see the entire layout to see the functionality of the space.
Applicant David Sandoval joined via Zoom to present the layout of the building. He explained
they would keep the ATM in the front of the building along University Drive from a convenience perspective.
Board Member Hebert proposed approval with the condition that they clad the right side of the building and remove the pole.
Chairperson Cornelius agreed it would be an upgrade.
Board Member Rusyn did not agree the pole should be moved.
Chairperson Cornelius asked for action on Board Member Hebert's proposal.
Board Member Hebert motioned to approve the request with the stipulation that the right side of the building be re-cladded with the same materials and that the pole be
removed or relocated. Board Member Marvel seconded the motion, which passed (4-2). Board Members Rusyn and McKinney opposed.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items – A
Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may
be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda
for a subsequent meeting.
There were no items presented.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 a.m.
APPROVED:
_________________________________
Chairperson, Jason Cornelius
ATTEST:
_________________________________ Tiffany Romero, Staff Assistant
Page 5 of 26
Design Review Board Page 1 of 6
July 14, 2023
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
for
1500 Holleman Drive East
AWV2023-000012
REQUEST: Waiver to UDO Section 7.10.C.3.a.1, Horizontal Façade
Articulation, to not provide the required Horizontal Façade
Articulation on the primary façade
SCALE: 2.0 acres
LOCATION: Lot 1, Block 2, of the Post Oak Mall Subdivision, generally located
at 1500 Holleman Drive East
ZONING DISTRICT: WPC Wolf Pen Creek
APPLICANT: Sterling Thompson, Sterling and Kap Architects, LLC
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Howell, Senior Planner
jhowell@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the waiver.
Page 6 of 26
Design Review Board Page 2 of 6
July 14, 2023
Page 7 of 26
Design Review Board Page 3 of 6
July 14, 2023
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY
While this development is located within the Wolf Pen Creek District, which includes several
additional building design standards found within Section 5.8.A.8, buildings must also comply
with the Non-Residential Architectural Standards. As stated in Section 7.10.A. of the Unified
Development Ordinance, the intent of the Non-Residential Architectural Standards is to:
1) Protect and enhance the character and quality of non-residential buildings and
associated site elements in the interest of the general welfare of the City;
2) Establish minimum design parameters for the appearance of non-residential buildings,
including heightened standards for more visible and prominent areas of the community;
3) Not limit architectural creativity or prescribe a specific architectural style; and
4) Provide a balance between the community’s economic and aesthetic concerns.
The Unified Development Ordinance grants the Design Review Board (DRB) the authority to
hear and decide proposals for waivers and appeals to the Non-Residential Architectural
Standards. Specifically, Section 7.10.E. states:
The Design Review Board (DRB) shall review requests for deviations from the Non-Residential
Architectural Standards. The DRB shall approve waivers or appeals found meeting the intent
and general purposes of the standards as it is recognized that unique and unforeseen design
circumstances exist in application of the standards. Financial hardship may not be considered
in the review or determination of a waiver proposal.
DRB may review and grant approval of the following:
….
3. Alternative materials on façade work that does not involve an expansion of an existing
building as defined in Article 9 of the UDO or constitute redevelopment if the applicant shows
that:
a. The materials allowed in this Section cannot be utilized without a structural alteration(s)
to the existing building;
b. A licensed professional engineer or architect verifies in writing that a structural alteration
is required to apply the permitted façade materials to the building; and
c. The DRB may grant a variance of up to one hundred (100) percent from the façade
articulation or roofline standards herein if the applicant shows that it is not financially or
structurally feasible.
Based on these criteria, the Design Review Board can act upon the proposed request in one of
the following ways:
1) Approve the request as proposed
2) Approve the request with conditions
3) Deny the request
Page 8 of 26
Design Review Board Page 4 of 6
July 14, 2023
ITEM SUMMARY: The request is to allow for the renovation and redesign of an existing
building (the former Sears Parts & Repair Center) on Holleman Drive in the Wolf Pen Creek
zoning district. The Wolf Pen Creek (WPC) district is intended to encourage harmonious
development along the Wolf Pen Creek Corridor which combines parks, arts, and commerce in
order to link public and private uses together within an urban greenway. The renovation and
redesign includes the primary façade (Façade ‘A’) that faces Holleman Drive East without
providing the Horizontal Façade Articulation as required by the Unified Development Ordinance
(UDO) for a primary façade that exceeds 200 feet in length.
A new tenant, Union Oak Food Market, is looking to redevelop the property and update all
façades of the existing building. The existing building, constructed in 1981 of concrete block,
provides minimal articulation of the primary façade, which is just over 211 feet in length.
Currently, there are 5 bay doors for trucks, a service entrance, and a main entry door covered
by a canopy. This is proposed to be replaced with windows, doors, and several relief elements
in order to meet the Architectural Relief Element requirements, one of which includes a metal
canopy structure as an entry element. While this element is indicated to be about 38 feet long, it
is not considered a wall plane projection and therefore does not meet the minimum depth
requirements of 4 feet, nor does it meet the required minimum width requirement of 33% of the
entire façade (69 feet 9 inches). Therefore, the applicant is requesting that the DRB waive the
requirement to provide the Horizontal Façade Articulation of the primary façade found in Section
7.10.C.3.a.1.
Existing Building
Page 9 of 26
Design Review Board Page 5 of 6
July 14, 2023
Façade ‘A’
211’-4”
Elevation- Façade ‘A’
Roof Plan
Page 10 of 26
Design Review Board Page 6 of 6
July 14, 2023
REVIEW CRITERIA:
In order to promote quality construction and visually interesting non-residential structures, the
UDO specifies minimum architectural standards that include Building Mass and Design,
specifically Horizontal Façade Articulation, to achieve this goal. Other than the waiver request
stated above, the proposed design meets UDO requirements for Non-Residential Architectural
Standards.
Section 7.10.E.3. states that the Design Review Board may review and grant approval of the
following:
3. Alternative materials on façade work that does not involve an expansion of an existing
building as defined in Article 9 of the UDO or constitute redevelopment if the applicant
shows that:
a. The materials allowed in this Section cannot be utilized without a structural
alteration(s) to the existing building;
b. A licensed professional engineer or architect verifies in writing that a
structural alteration is required to apply the permitted façade materials to the
building; and
c. The DRB may grant a variance of up to one hundred (100) percent from the
façade articulation or roofline standards herein if the applicant shows that it is
not financially or structurally feasible.
The architect for the project has provided a letter regarding the request, which is attached to this
report.
The applicant states that alterations to the existing structure would be required in order to meet
the requirements of the ordinance and that the structural integrity would be affected. It was also
stated that adding the required projection would add unnecessary structural issues and cost
while not adding functional interior space. The applicant also states that the proposed metal
canopy, as well as other articulations, are provided to leave less than half of the façade
remaining on the same plane.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the waiver request.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS:
1. Applicant’s Supporting Information
2. Applicant’s Letter
3. NRA Application Submittal (NRA2023-000005) (includes conceptual site plan, roof plan
and elevation drawings of all facades)
-Note: Please see Page 3 for Façade ‘A’
4. 3D Renderings
Page 11 of 26
Name of Project: UNION OAK FOOD MARKET (FORMER SEARS HOME SERVICES) - REMODEL
Address: 1500 HOLLEMAN DR E
Legal Description: POST OAK MALL, BLOCK 2, LOT 1, ACRES 2.
Applicant: Sterling Thompson
Property Owner: UB COLLEGE STATION1 LLC
Applicable ordinance section being appealed/seeking waiver from:
Section 7.10.C.3.a.1
Current Zoning:
WPC - Wolf Pen Creek
The following specific alternative to, or waiver from, the ordinance is requested:
:HDUHDVNLQJDZDLYHUWRWKH+RUL]RQWDO)DoDGH$UWLFXODWLRQWKDWZRXOGUHTXLUHRXUSURSRVHGZDOOSODQ
projections on the primary facade to have a minimum depth of 4'-0"
The unnecessary hardship(s) involved by meeting the provisions of the ordinance other than financial
hardship is/are:
This is an existing building that in its present form is a 210¶long x 110¶deep x 18¶tall box composed of
concrete block walls with little-to-no horizontal articulation. We are already proposing several changes visual
changes in terms of changes in exterior cladding, adding awnings/canopies, and new parapet articulation
The client does not wish to extend the existing building envelope and adding bump-outs that extend 4¶0´from
the facade to meet the Horizontal Facade Articulation requirement to the letter feels like an unnecessary
alteration with no commercial benefit in terms of rentable tenant space other than exterior aesthetic
considerations which we feel are already being met by the exterior alterations already being provided.
The following alternatives to the requested appeal/waiver are possible:
We are already providing horizontal facade articulation but the areas we are bumping out from the wall with
materials such as stone and wood siding across all four facades to contrast with the plan, flat existing concrete
APPEAL/WAIVER APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Page 1 of 2
Page 12 of 26
facade of building, but they do not extend out to 4'-0" as the NRA requires.
We do have a number of metal awning across the front that do extend 4'-0SDVWWKHIDoDGH7KHVWUXFWXUH
over the main entrance extends nearly 13'-6" past exterior wall of the existing building.
Substitution of building materials explanation:
N/A
Alternative materials on facade work on an existing building explanation:
N/A
Facade articulation and/or roofline waiver:
Horizontal Facade Articulation
Not financially feasible explanation:
The client does not want to extend the interior envelop of the existing building, which basically a large
rectangular box. The addition of 4'-0" projections along the primary facades would not provide any additional
habitable space for the tenants renting out the various food stalls along the perimeter of the interior.
All effects these additional structures would have would simply be aesthetic only and we feel the alterations
we're already providing in out design meet the intent to the NRA requirements to provide and aesthetically
interesting building.
Not structurally feasible explanation:
N/A
Provide additional information for alternate colors or materials for a franchised or chain restaurant:
N/A
Page 2 of 2
Page 13 of 26
Architecture / Design / Planning
Sterling and Kap Architects, LLC2416 Columbus AveWaco, TX 76701sterling@sterlingandkap.comscott@sterlingandkap.com254.756.2311 254.756.2577
City of College Station
Planning & Development Services Department
AWV2023-000012
Union Oak Food Market ( Former Sears Home Services)- Remodel
June 21, 2023
Financial and Structural Feasibility of Facade Articulation Additions
I would like to respectfully request a variance to the facade articulation
requirement as required per section 7.10.E.3b.
To meet the requirements of this ordinance would require alterations to
the existing structure of concrete block and steel bar joists. Additions of
projections of four feet every fifty feet would add unnecessary costs to
the remodel and would not add to the functionality of the building's use.
It would add space that is not needed in areas where the interior use
would be affected negatively. The structural integrity of the existing
structure would be affected and structural alterations would have to be
constructed in order to address these issues.
Currently, as designed,there is an existing 211'-4" foot long front facade.
We have a 38' long
projection ( 18% ) that projects greater than 4', as an entry element. We
have also given the facade articulation using different materials for a
total of another 86 feet or 40 %. These articulations do not project the
four feet but are attached to the facade and project above the roof as a
parapet to conceal rooftop equipment. These articulations also have
awnings that do project four feet from the facade. This leaves about 42%
of the existing facade in the same plane.
In my professional opinion, enough interest has been created with the
front facade with the design as we've presented it. Adding four foot
projections to this existing structure would add unnecassary structural
issues and cost to the project while adding nothing to the functionality of
the interior space. Therefore we respectfully request this variance.
Best Regards,
Sterling Thompson, A.I.A. , N.C.A.R.B.
Texas # 11091
Page 14 of 26
S/D
D
= POWER POLE
= GUY WIRE
= WATER VALVE
= FIRE HYDRANT
= SIGN
= SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
= SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
= STORM SEWER MANHOLE
= ELECTRIC LINE
= WATER LINE
= SEWER LINE
= STORM DRAIN LINE
= CONCRETE
GROUNDCOVER AS PER CITY OF
WACO PLANTING LIST=
= NORTH ARROW
GRASS AS PER CITY OF WACO
PLANTING LIST=
SITE SYMBOLS
NORTH
= EASEMENT LINE
= BUILDING SETBACK LINE
= PROPERTY LINE
C
S
ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES (RULE 68.104 - TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE)
(a)PAVED PARKING SPACES MUST INCLUDE:
(1)THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY PAINTED
CONSPICUOUSLY ON THE SURFACE IN A COLOR THAT CONTRASTS THE
PAVEMENT;
(2)THE WORDS "NO PARKING" PAINTED ON ANY ACCESS AISLE ADJACENT TO
THE PARKING SPACE. THE WORDS MUST BE PAINTED:
(A)IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS;
(B)WITH A LETTER HEIGHT OF AT LEAST TWELVE INCHES, AND A
STROKE WIDTH OF AT LEAST TWO INCHES; AND
(C)CENTERED WITHIN EACH ACCESS AISLE ADJACENT TO THE PARKING
SPACE; AND
(3)A SIGN IDENTIFYING THE CONSEQUENCES OF PARKING ILLEGALLY IN A
PAVED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. THE SIGN MUST:
(A)AT A MINIMUM STATE "VIOLATORS SUBJECT TO FINE AND TOWING"
IN A LETTER HEIGHT OF AT LEAST ONE INCH;
(B)BE MOUNTED ON A POLE, POST, WALL, OR FREESTANDING BOARD
(C)BE NO MORE THAN EIGHT INCHES BELOW A SIGN REQUIRED BY
TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS, 502.6; AND
(D)BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE BOTTOM EDGE OF THE SIGN IS NO
LOWER THAN 48 INCHES AND NO HIGHER THAN 80 INCHES ABOVE
GROUND LEVEL.
(b)A PARKING SPACE IDENTIFICATION SIGN THAT COMPLIES WITH TEXAS
ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS, 502.6, THAT INCLUDES THE REQUIREMENTS IN
SUBSECTION (a)(3)(A) SATISFIES SUBSECTION (a)(3).
SITE NOTES
HOLLEMAN DRIVE E.
EXISTING BUILDING
COOLER/FREEZER HOUSING6
:
1
(
1
:
15'-0" BUILDING SETBACK 15'-0" BUILDING SETBACK 15'-0" BUILDING SETBACK
AREA RESERVED FOR THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
1 SITE PLAN
1" = 20'-0"UNION OAK FOOD MARKET1500 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840(POST OAK MALL, BLOCK 2, LOT 1, ACRES 2)PROJECT #:2022-05-02
DRAWN:SBK
CHECKED:SWT
DATE:03/24/23
1 04/25/23
REVISIONS:
03/24/23
THESE DOCUMENTS AND DESIGNS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND NO PART
SHALL BE COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT
HIS WRITTEN PERMISSION. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS IN WHOLE
OR IN PART IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
ALL COPY RIGHT LAWS ARE APPLICABLE.
&23<5,*+7$//5,*+765(6(59('
STERLING & KAP ARCHITECTS
2416 COLUMBUS AVENUE
WACO, TEXAS 76701
P: 254.756.2311 F: 254.756.2577
www.sterlingandkap.com
1220 AUSTIN AVE
WACO, TX 76701
P: 254.400.2572
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 05/25/23
NORTH
0.0
SITE PLAN
Page 15 of 26
CANTED METAL WALL CAP
CANTED METAL WALL CAP
CANTED METAL WALL CAP
CANTED METAL WALL CAP
CANTED METAL
WALL CAP
CANTED METAL WALL CAPCANTED METAL WALL CAPCANTED METAL WALL CAPCANTED METAL WALL CAP
CANTED METAL WALL CAP
CANTED METAL WALL CAP
CANTED METAL WALL CAP
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
CRICKET
NEW ROOF HATCH
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
STRUCTURAL
COLUMN BELOW
STRUCTURAL
COLUMN BELOW
STRUCTURAL
COLUMN BELOW
STRUCTURAL
COLUMN BELOW
EXISTING ROOF HATCH
(PERMANENTLY CAP)
NEW METAL AWNING
NEW METAL AWNING
NEW
METAL
AWNING
NEW METAL AWNING
NEW METAL
AWNINGNEW METAL AWNING
NEW METAL AWNING
NEW METAL AWNINGNEW METAL AWNINGNEW METAL AWNINGNEW METAL AWNING
2x6 TUBULAR STEEL @ 8" O.C.
2x6 TUBULAR
STEEL
@ 8" O.C.
26. GA. GALVALUME
ROOF PANELS OVER
SYNTHETIC UNDERLAYMENT
OVER 12" CDX SHEATHING
26. GA. GALVALUME
ROOF PANELS
26. GA. GALVALUME
ROOF PANELS
26. GA. GALVALUME
ROOF PANELS
WIDE FLANGE STRUCTURE BELOW
TUBULAR STEEL
STRUCTURE BELOW
TUBULAR STEEL
STRUCTURE BELOW
EXISTING TPO ROOFING
OVER RIGID INSULATION
EXISTING TPO ROOFING
OVER RIGID INSULATION
EXISTING TPO ROOFING
OVER RIGID INSULATION
NEW ROOF CRICKET
60 MIL. TPO ROOFING
OVER RIGID INSULATION
NEW ROOF CRICKET
60 MIL. TPO ROOFING
OVER RIGID INSULATION
NEW ROOF CRICKET
60 MIL. TPO ROOFING
OVER RIGID INSULATION
24 GA. PREFINISHED
METAL GUTTER
& DOWNSPOUTS
24 GA. PREFINISHED
METAL GUTTER
& DOWNSPOUTS
24 GA. PREFINISHED
METAL GUTTER
& DOWNSPOUTS
24 GA. PREFINISHED
METAL GUTTER
& DOWNSPOUTS
12
.25
12
.25
12
.25
12
.25
12
.25
12
.25
NEW ROOF CRICKET
60 MIL. TPO ROOFING
OVER RIGID INSULATION
NEW ROOF CRICKET
60 MIL. TPO ROOFING
OVER RIGID INSULATION
CANTED METAL WALL CAP
PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE
15'-0" BUILDING SETBACK LINE15'-0" BUILDING SETBACK LINE
ALLOWED 6'-0" CANOPY ENCROACHMENT INTO SETBACKALLOWED 6'-0" CANOPY ENCROACHMENT INTO SETBACK
10'-2"6'-0"9'-0"2'-8"7'-6"6'-0"9'-0"10'-2"6'-0"9'-0"AREA RESERVED FOR THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION2'-8"10'-934"4'-0"4'-0"8"4'-0"8"
4'-0"
4'-0"
8"512"15'-0"2'-8"13'-4"1'-0"15'-0"4'-0"8"8"
2'-8"10'-93
4"
4'-0"
4"
8"8"4'-0"8"4'-0"8"4'-0"8'-0"8"4'-0"23'-0"20'-0"18'-8"20'-0"38'-0"4'-0"4'-0"
20'-0"37'-0"18'-8"
10'-0"6'-0"6'-0"10'-0"62'-4"11'-0"11'-0"28'-0"8'-0"20'-0"21'-8"26'-0"
20'-0"
38'-0"
2'-4"32'-4"2'-4"
33'-6"32'-0"
31'-0"
24'-8"8'-0"8'-0"7'-8"22'-0"4'-0"38'-0"23'-8"8'-0"11'-0"20'-0"LINE OF WALL BELOW
LINE OF WALL BELOW
LINE OF WALL BELOW
19'-0"19'-0"6'-0"19'-0"6'-0"6'-0"UNION OAK FOOD MARKET1500 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840(POST OAK MALL, BLOCK 2, LOT 1, ACRES 2)PROJECT #:2022-05-02
DRAWN:SBK
CHECKED:SWT
DATE:03/24/23
1 04/25/23
REVISIONS:
03/24/23
THESE DOCUMENTS AND DESIGNS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND NO PART
SHALL BE COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT
HIS WRITTEN PERMISSION. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS IN WHOLE
OR IN PART IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
ALL COPY RIGHT LAWS ARE APPLICABLE.
&23<5,*+7$//5,*+765(6(59('
STERLING & KAP ARCHITECTS
2416 COLUMBUS AVENUE
WACO, TEXAS 76701
P: 254.756.2311 F: 254.756.2577
www.sterlingandkap.com
1220 AUSTIN AVE
WACO, TX 76701
P: 254.400.2572
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 05/25/23
1.0
ROOF PLAN
1 ROOF PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"
Page 16 of 26
AREA RESERVED FOR THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
USE OF MATERIALS ON FACADE 'A' (FRONT SIDE) - PRIMARY FACADE
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF FACADE 'A' (FRONT SIDE): 5,388 SQ. FT.
PRIMARY MATERIALS FACADE AREA IN SQUARE FOOT PERCENT OF FACADE
EXPOSED EXISTING CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS 1,481 SQ. FT.27.6%
TRANSPARENCY 633 SQ. FT.11.8%
8" COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING 2,739 SQ. FT.51.1%
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP - OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)433 SQ. FT.8.1%
76 SQ. FT.1.4%
METAL TRIM ACCENT ELEMENTS
(AWNINGS, CANOPIES, & TRIMS)668 SQ. FT.13%
AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINE
ACCENT MATERIALS FACADE AREA IN SQUARE FOOT PERCENT OF FACADE
34%1,854 SQ. FT.PAINTED MURAL
(CONCEPTUAL, FINAL DESIGN MAY VARY)
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
N/A
CEDAR - RUSSET STAIN, OR EQUAL
PAINT "IBIS WHITE" - SW. 7000
___________
PAINT "IRON ORE" - SW 7069
VARIOUS COLORS, SEE PROPOSED COLOR SAMPLES
COLOR/MATERIAL SAMPLE
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
N/A
PAINT "IBIS WHITE" - SW. 7000
SUNDAY TOPAZ - SW 6117 TOTALLY TAN - SW 6115
ST. BART'S - SW 7614 WINDY BLUE - SW 6240
WHITE RAISIN - SW 7685
CLARY SAGE- SW 6178
ROYCROFT VELLUM - SW 2833
IBIS WHITE - SW 7000
FORESTWOOD- SW 7730
ROYCROFT BRASS - SW 2843
OAKMOSS- SW 6180
OLIVE GROVE - SW 7734
EDAMAME- SW 7729
WEATHERED SHINGLE - SW 2841
ARTICHOKE- SW 6179
BAMBOO SHOOT - SW 7733
18'-2"
23'-0"
25'-0"
31'-0"
18'-2"
23'-0"
25'-0"
31'-0"
0'-0"
28'-0"28'-0"
BREAK METAL TRIM
BREAK METAL TRIMBREAK METAL TRIM BREAK METAL TRIM BREAK METAL TRIM
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
BREAK METAL TRIM
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
NEW METAL
AWNING
NEW METAL
AWNING
NEW METAL
AWNING
NEW METAL
AWNING
NEW METAL
AWNING
NEW METAL
AWNING
NEW METAL
AWNING
EXISITING CMU WALLS
INFILL EXISTING OPENINGS
MURAL BY OTHERS
EXISITING CMU WALLS
INFILL EXISTING OPENINGS
MURAL BY OTHERS
AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINE
13'-0"AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINE
2x6 TUBULAR STEEL @ 8" O.C.
2x6 TUBULAR
STEEL
@ 8" O.C.
EXISITING CMU WALLS
INFILL EXISTING OPENINGS
MURAL BY OTHERS
NEW ALUM. FRAME
STOREFRONT NEW ALUM. FRAME
STOREFRONT
NEW ALUM. FRAME
STOREFRONT
NEW ALUM. FRAME
STOREFRONT
NEW ALUM.
FRAME
STOREFRONT
NEW ALUM. FRAME
STOREFRONT NEW INSULATED METAL GARAGE DOOR (R7.7)
"
PROPOSED MURAL COLOR SCHEME (MURAL SHOWN IN DRAWINGS IS CONCEPTUAL, FINAL DESIGN MAY VARY)
ROOFLINE ELEVATIONS ON FACADE 'A'
TOTAL LINEAR FEET OF FACADE 'A' (FRONT SIDE): 211'-4" SQ. FT.
PARAPET/ROOF HEIGHT LINEAR FEET OF FACADE PERCENT OF FACADE
23'-0"
28'-0"
78'-8"37.2%
31'-0"
8'-0"3.8%
38'-0"18.0%
211'-4"
25'-0"
8'-0"23'-0"20'-0"18'-8"20'-0"4'-0"38'-0"4'-0"20'-0"37'-0"18'-8"5'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"8'-0"20'-0"86'-8"41.0%
ARCHITECTURAL RELIEF ELEMENTS ON FACADE 'A' (FRONT SIDE) - PRIMARY FACADE
TOTAL LINEAR FEET OF FACADE 'A' (FRONT SIDE): 211'-4" SQ. FT.
REQUIRED NUMBER OF ELEMENTS (1:25) = 9 ELEMENTS
PARAPET/ROOF HEIGHT LINEAR FEET OF FACADE PROJECTION FROM FACADE
38'-0"10'-934"
4"+ PROJECTIONS FROM MAIN FACE OF BUILDING
(COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING 'TOWERS')
85'-0"4'-0" (HANGING AWNINGS)
WELL DEFINED CORNICE/ARCHI. TERMINATION
(METAL SCREENING)
124'-8"8" TYPICAL TOWER BUMP OUTS &
2'-8" MAIN ENTRANCE TOWER
NUMBER OF ELEMENTS PERCENT OF ELEMENTS
ROOFLINE ARTICULATION N/A
1
7
6
TOTAL NUMBER OF ELEMENTS
7.1%
50%
100%
-
-
42.9%
14
OTHER ARCHITECTURAL RELIEF
(MAIN ENTRANCE CANOPY STRUCTURE)
METAL CANOPIES &
HANGING METAL AWNINGS
WALL PLANE PROJECTIONS OVER 4'-0"N/A N/A N/A -
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A UNION OAK FOOD MARKET1500 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840(POST OAK MALL, BLOCK 2, LOT 1, ACRES 2)PROJECT #:2022-05-02
DRAWN:SBK
CHECKED:SWT
DATE:03/24/23
1 04/25/23
REVISIONS:
03/24/23
THESE DOCUMENTS AND DESIGNS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND NO PART
SHALL BE COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT
HIS WRITTEN PERMISSION. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS IN WHOLE
OR IN PART IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
ALL COPY RIGHT LAWS ARE APPLICABLE.
&23<5,*+7$//5,*+765(6(59('
STERLING & KAP ARCHITECTS
2416 COLUMBUS AVENUE
WACO, TEXAS 76701
P: 254.756.2311 F: 254.756.2577
www.sterlingandkap.com
1220 AUSTIN AVE
WACO, TX 76701
P: 254.400.2572
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 05/25/23
1.1
FACADE 'A'
FRONT SIDE ELEVATION
1 FACADE 'A' (FRONT ELEVATION) - ARCHITECTURAL
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 FACADE 'A' (FRONT ELEVATION) - FULL COLOR
1/8" = 1'-0"
Page 17 of 26
AREA RESERVED FOR THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
USE OF MATERIALS ON FACADE 'B' (RIGHT SIDE)
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF FACADE 'A' (RIGHT SIDE): 2,720 SQ. FT.
PRIMARY MATERIALS FACADE AREA IN SQUARE FOOT PERCENT OF FACADE
EXPOSED EXISTING CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS 509 SQ. FT.
TRANSPARENCY 0 SQ. FT.0%
8" COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING 1,034 SQ. FT.
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP - OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)367 SQ. FT.
810 SQ. FT.
METAL TRIM ACCENT ELEMENTS
(AWNINGS, CANOPIES, & TRIMS)92 SQ. FT.
18.7%
38.0%
13.5%
29.8%
3.4%
AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINE
ACCENT MATERIALS FACADE AREA IN SQUARE FOOT PERCENT OF FACADE
PAINTED MURAL
(CONCEPTUAL, FINAL DESIGN MAY VARY)800 SQ. FT.29.4%
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
N/A
CEDAR - RUSSET STAIN, OR EQUAL
PAINT "IBIS WHITE" - SW. 7000
___________
PAINT "IRON ORE" - SW 7069
VARIOUS COLORS, SEE PROPOSED COLOR SAMPLES
COLOR/MATERIAL SAMPLE
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
N/A
PAINT "IBIS WHITE" - SW. 7000
SUNDAY TOPAZ - SW 6117 TOTALLY TAN - SW 6115
ST. BART'S - SW 7614 WINDY BLUE - SW 6240
WHITE RAISIN - SW 7685
CLARY SAGE- SW 6178
ROYCROFT VELLUM - SW 2833
IBIS WHITE - SW 7000
FORESTWOOD- SW 7730
ROYCROFT BRASS - SW 2843
OAKMOSS- SW 6180
OLIVE GROVE - SW 7734
EDAMAME- SW 7729
WEATHERED SHINGLE - SW 2841
ARTICHOKE- SW 6179
BAMBOO SHOOT - SW 7733
0'-0"
18'-2"
23'-0"
25'-0"
31'-0"
18'-2"
23'-0"
25'-0"
31'-0"
0'-0"
28'-0"28'-0"
2x6 TUBULAR STEEL @ 8" O.C.
SIGNAGE BY OTHERS
EXISITING CMU WALLS
INFILL EXISTING OPENINGS
MURAL BY OTHERS
AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINE
NEW METAL
AWNING
NEW METAL
AWNING
BREAK METAL TRIM BREAK METAL TRIM
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
T.S. FRAMED CANOPY
W.F. STEEL FRAMED CANOPY
INSULATED METAL DOORINSULATED METAL DOOR10'-0"10'-0"4'-13
4"6'-8"
PROPOSED MURAL COLOR SCHEME (MURAL SHOWN IN DRAWINGS IS CONCEPTUAL, FINAL DESIGN MAY VARY)14'-9"19'-9"PROPERTY LINE15'-0" BUILDING SETBACK9'-0"6'-0"
10'-0"
62'-4"
73'-4"28'-0"
ROOFLINE ELEVATIONS ON FACADE 'B'
TOTAL LINEAR FEET OF FACADE 'B' (RIGHT SIDE): 111'-4" SQ. FT.
PARAPET/ROOF HEIGHT LINEAR FEET OF FACADE PERCENT OF FACADE
23'-0"
28'-0"
10'-0"9.0%
31'-0"
28'-0"
0'-0"0%
25'-0"
73'-4"65.9%
ARCHITECTURAL RELIEF ELEMENTS ON FACADE 'B' (RIGHT SIDE)
TOTAL LINEAR FEET OF FACADE 'B' (RIGHT SIDE): 111'-4" SQ. FT.
REQUIRED NUMBER OF ELEMENTS (1:25) = 5 ELEMENTS
PARAPET/ROOF HEIGHT LINEAR FEET OF FACADE PROJECTION FROM FACADE
4"+ PROJECTIONS FROM MAIN FACE OF BUILDING
(COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING 'TOWERS')
12'-0"4'-0" (HANGING AWNINGS)
WELL DEFINED CORNICE/ARCHI. TERMINATION
(METAL SCREENING)
18'-0"8" TYPICAL TOWER BUMP OUTS
73'-4"
NUMBER OF ELEMENTS PERCENT OF ELEMENTS
ROOFLINE ARTICULATION
1
SEE ROOFLINE ELEVATION CHART
FOR FACADE 'B'N/A 1
2
2
TOTAL NUMBER OF ELEMENTS
28.6%
100%
111'-4"
10'-0"1 14.3%62'-4"WALL PLANE PROJECTIONS OVER 4'-0"
(STONE FREEZER/COOLER ENCLOSURE)
28.6%13'-0"5'-0"2'-0"25.1%
7
N/A N/A N/A -OTHER ARCHITECTURAL RELIEF
METAL CANOPIES &
HANGING METAL AWNINGS
N/A
14.3%
14.3%UNION OAK FOOD MARKET1500 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840(POST OAK MALL, BLOCK 2, LOT 1, ACRES 2)PROJECT #:2022-05-02
DRAWN:SBK
CHECKED:SWT
DATE:03/24/23
1 04/25/23
REVISIONS:
03/24/23
THESE DOCUMENTS AND DESIGNS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND NO PART
SHALL BE COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT
HIS WRITTEN PERMISSION. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS IN WHOLE
OR IN PART IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
ALL COPY RIGHT LAWS ARE APPLICABLE.
&23<5,*+7$//5,*+765(6(59('
STERLING & KAP ARCHITECTS
2416 COLUMBUS AVENUE
WACO, TEXAS 76701
P: 254.756.2311 F: 254.756.2577
www.sterlingandkap.com
1220 AUSTIN AVE
WACO, TX 76701
P: 254.400.2572
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 05/25/23
1.2
FACADE 'B'
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
1 FACADE 'B' (RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION) - ARCHITECTURAL
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 FACADE 'B' (RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION) - FULL COLOR
1/8" = 1'-0"
Page 18 of 26
AREA RESERVED FOR THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
N/A
CEDAR - RUSSET STAIN, OR EQUAL
PAINT "IBIS WHITE" - SW. 7000
___________
PAINT "IRON ORE" - SW 7069
VARIOUS COLORS, SEE PROPOSED COLOR SAMPLES
COLOR/MATERIAL SAMPLE
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
N/A
PAINT "IBIS WHITE" - SW. 7000
USE OF MATERIALS ON FACADE 'C' (BACK SIDE)
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF FACADE 'A' (BACK SIDE): 5,224 SQ. FT.
PRIMARY MATERIALS FACADE AREA IN SQUARE FOOT PERCENT OF FACADE
EXPOSED EXISTING CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS
TRANSPARENCY
1,267 SQ. FT.
12.1%
8" COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP - OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
METAL TRIM ACCENT ELEMENTS
(AWNINGS, CANOPIES, & TRIMS)
1,528 SQ. FT.28.6%
23.7%
777 SQ. FT.14.5%
1,130 SQ. FT.21.1%
566 SQ. FT.10.6%
650 SQ. FT.
AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINE
ACCENT MATERIALS FACADE AREA IN SQUARE FOOT PERCENT OF FACADE
29.7%1,590 SQ. FT.PAINTED MURAL
(CONCEPTUAL, FINAL DESIGN MAY VARY)
SUNDAY TOPAZ - SW 6117 TOTALLY TAN - SW 6115
ST. BART'S - SW 7614 WINDY BLUE - SW 6240
WHITE RAISIN - SW 7685
CLARY SAGE- SW 6178
ROYCROFT VELLUM - SW 2833
IBIS WHITE - SW 7000
FORESTWOOD- SW 7730
ROYCROFT BRASS - SW 2843
OAKMOSS- SW 6180
OLIVE GROVE - SW 7734
EDAMAME- SW 7729
WEATHERED SHINGLE - SW 2841
ARTICHOKE- SW 6179
BAMBOO SHOOT - SW 7733
18'-2"
0'-0"
15'-14"
23'-0"
31'-0"
23'-0"
31'-0"
0'-0"
28'-0"28'-0"
15'-14"
BREAK METAL TRIM
BREAK METAL TRIM
BREAK METAL TRIM
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINE
AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINE
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
AUSTIN STONE
15% NICOTINE
NEW ALUM. FRAME
STOREFRONT
TILT-UP OVERHEAD DOOR
24 GA. PREFINISHED
METAL DOWNSPOUT
24 GA. PREFINISHED
METAL DOWNSPOUT
24 GA. PREFINISHED
METAL DOWNSPOUT
T.S. FRAMED CANOPY
T.S. FRAMED CANOPY
W.F. STEEL FRAMED CANOPY
AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINE
NEW ALUM. FRAME
STOREFRONT
24 GA. PREFINISHED
METAL GUTTER
24 GA. PREFINISHED
METAL GUTTER
24 GA. PREFINISHED
METAL GUTTER
24 GA. PREFINISHED
METAL GUTTER
NEW METAL
AWNING
2x6 TUBULAR
STEEL
@ 8" O.C.
EXISITING CMU WALLS
INFILL EXISTING OPENINGS
MURAL BY OTHERS
EXISITING CMU WALLS
INFILL EXISTING OPENINGS
MURAL BY OTHERS
PROPOSED MURAL COLOR SCHEME (MURAL SHOWN IN DRAWINGS IS CONCEPTUAL, FINAL DESIGN MAY VARY)
ROOFLINE ELEVATIONS ON FACADE 'C'
TOTAL LINEAR FEET OF FACADE 'C (BACK SIDE): 211'-4" SQ. FT.
PARAPET/ROOF HEIGHT LINEAR FEET OF FACADE PERCENT OF FACADE
23'-0"
28'-0"
53'-8"25.4%
31'-0"
16'-0"7.6%
38'-0"18.0%
25'-0"
103' -8"49.0%
ARCHITECTURAL RELIEF ELEMENTS ON FACADE 'C' (BACK SIDE)
PARAPET/ROOF HEIGHT LINEAR FEET OF FACADE PROJECTION FROM FACADE
N/A N/A
METAL CANOPIES &
HANGING METAL AWNINGS
15'-0" (SIDE CANOPIES)
13'-0" (MAIN ENTRANCE CANOPY)
4'-0" (HANGING AWNINGS)
4"+ PROJECTIONS FROM MAIN FACE OF BUILDING
(COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING 'TOWERS' & STONE BUMP OUTS)
WELL DEFINED CORNICE/ARCHI. TERMINATION
(METAL SCREENING)
107'-8"
8" TYPICAL TOWER BUMP OUTS
2'-8" MAIN ENTRANCE TOWER
1'-0" STONE BUMP OUTS
103'-8"
NUMBER OF ELEMENTS
4
PERCENT OF ELEMENTS
36.4%
ROOFLINE ARTICULATION
N/A 1
N/A 1
5
TOTAL NUMBER OF ELEMENTS 11 100%
45.5%
TOTAL LINEAR FEET OF FACADE 'B' (LEFT SIDE): 211'-4" SQ. FT.
REQUIRED NUMBER OF ELEMENTS (1:25) = 9 ELEMENTS
100'-0"
N/A
8'-0"20'-0"5'-0"8'-0"38'-0"21'-8"26'-0"33'-0"32'-0"24'-8"8'-0"
211'-4"5'-0"8'-0"-
9.1%19'-9"14'-9"14'-9"20'-0"31'-0"
37'-0"
20'-10"27'-4"34'-0"25'-2"
6"6"
OTHER ARCHITECTURAL RELIEF
WALL PLANE PROJECTIONS OVER 4'-0"N/A N/A N/A -
25'-0"25'-0"2'-0"2'-0"9.1%SEE ROOFLINE ELEVATION CHART
FOR FACADE 'C'UNION OAK FOOD MARKET1500 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840(POST OAK MALL, BLOCK 2, LOT 1, ACRES 2)PROJECT #:2022-05-02
DRAWN:SBK
CHECKED:SWT
DATE:03/24/23
1 04/25/23
REVISIONS:
03/24/23
THESE DOCUMENTS AND DESIGNS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND NO PART
SHALL BE COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT
HIS WRITTEN PERMISSION. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS IN WHOLE
OR IN PART IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
ALL COPY RIGHT LAWS ARE APPLICABLE.
&23<5,*+7$//5,*+765(6(59('
STERLING & KAP ARCHITECTS
2416 COLUMBUS AVENUE
WACO, TEXAS 76701
P: 254.756.2311 F: 254.756.2577
www.sterlingandkap.com
1220 AUSTIN AVE
WACO, TX 76701
P: 254.400.2572
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 05/25/23
1.3
FACADE 'C'
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
1 FACADE 'C' (BACK SIDE ELEVATION) - ARCHITECTURAL
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 FACADE 'C' (BACK SIDE ELEVATION) - FULL COLOR
1/8" = 1'-0"
Page 19 of 26
AREA RESERVED FOR THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
USE OF MATERIALS ON FACADE 'D' (LEFT SIDE)
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF FACADE 'A' (LEFT SIDE): 2,945 SQ. FT.
PRIMARY MATERIALS FACADE AREA IN SQUARE FOOT PERCENT OF FACADE
EXPOSED EXISTING CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS
TRANSPARENCY
8" COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP - OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINE
METAL TRIM ACCENT ELEMENTS
(AWNINGS, CANOPIES, & TRIMS)
14.7%433 SQ. FT.
21.3%636 SQ. FT.
44%1,297 SQ. FT.
10%294 SQ. FT.
10%295 SQ. FT.
15.3%451 SQ. FT.
ACCENT MATERIALS FACADE AREA IN SQUARE FOOT PERCENT OF FACADE
25.1%740 SQ. FT.PAINTED MURAL
(CONCEPTUAL, FINAL DESIGN MAY VARY)
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
N/A
CEDAR - RUSSET STAIN, OR EQUAL
PAINT "IBIS WHITE" - SW. 7000
___________
PAINT "IRON ORE" - SW 7069
VARIOUS COLORS, SEE PROPOSED COLOR SAMPLES
COLOR/MATERIAL SAMPLE
PRIMARY COLOR OF MATERIAL
N/A
PAINT "IBIS WHITE" - SW. 7000
SUNDAY TOPAZ - SW 6117 TOTALLY TAN - SW 6115
ST. BART'S - SW 7614 WINDY BLUE - SW 6240
WHITE RAISIN - SW 7685
CLARY SAGE- SW 6178
ROYCROFT VELLUM - SW 2833
IBIS WHITE - SW 7000
FORESTWOOD- SW 7730
ROYCROFT BRASS - SW 2843
OAKMOSS- SW 6180
OLIVE GROVE - SW 7734
EDAMAME- SW 7729
WEATHERED SHINGLE - SW 2841
ARTICHOKE- SW 6179
BAMBOO SHOOT - SW 7733
PROPOSED MURAL COLOR SCHEME (MURAL SHOWN IN DRAWINGS IS CONCEPTUAL, FINAL DESIGN MAY VARY)
0'-0"
18'-2"
23'-0"
25'-0"
31'-0"
18'-2"
23'-0"
25'-0"
31'-0"
0'-0"
28'-0"28'-0"
BREAK METAL TRIM 8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
NEW ALUM. FRAME
STOREFRONT
NEW METAL
AWNING
EXISITING CMU WALLS
INFILL EXISTING OPENINGS
MURAL BY OTHERS AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINE
NEW ALUM. FRAME
STOREFRONT
2x6 TUBULAR STEEL @ 8" O.C.
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
14 GA. WOVEN WIRE MESH SCREENING
(WESTERN GROUP -
OVER AND UNDER I, OR EQUAL)
BREAK METAL TRIM
BREAK METAL TRIM
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
8" COMPOSITE
WOOD SIDING
2x6 TUBULAR STEEL @ 8" O.C.
SIGNAGE BY OTHERS
10'-0"10'-0"4'-13
4"6'-8"14'-0"T.S. FRAMED CANOPY
W.F.
TEEL FRAMED
CANOPY
AUSTIN STONE
50% NICOTINEPROPERTY LINE15'-0" BUILDING SETBACK9'-0"6'-0"
ARCHITECTURAL RELIEF ELEMENTS ON FACADE 'D' (LEFT SIDE)
PARAPET/ROOF HEIGHT LINEAR FEET OF FACADE PROJECTION FROM FACADE
38'-0"10'-934"
4"+ PROJECTIONS FROM MAIN FACE OF BUILDING
(COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING 'TOWERS')
20'-0"4'-0" (HANGING AWNINGS)
WELL DEFINED CORNICE/ARCHI. TERMINATION
(METAL SCREENING)
54'-0"8" TYPICAL TOWER BUMP OUTS
2'-8" MAIN ENTRANCE TOWER
57'-4"
NUMBER OF ELEMENTS PERCENT OF ELEMENTS
ROOFLINE ARTICULATION
OTHER ARCHITECTURAL RELIEF
(MAIN ENTRANCE CANOPY STRUCTURE)
N/A 1
N/A 1
1
1
3
TOTAL NUMBER OF ELEMENTS
14.3%
100%
42.8%
8'-0"
111'-4"
23'-8"38'-0"33'-8"8'-0"
ROOFLINE ELEVATIONS ON FACADE 'D'
TOTAL LINEAR FEET OF FACADE 'D' (LEFT SIDE): 111'-4" SQ. FT.
PARAPET/ROOF HEIGHT LINEAR FEET OF FACADE PERCENT OF FACADE
23'-0"
28'-0"16-0"14.4%
31'-0"38'-0"34.1%
25'-0"
57'-4"51.5%
TOTAL LINEAR FEET OF FACADE 'B' (LEFT SIDE): 111'-4" SQ. FT.
REQUIRED NUMBER OF ELEMENTS (1:25) = 5 ELEMENTS 5'-0"8'-0"5'-0"0'-0"0%
7
METAL CANOPIES &
HANGING METAL AWNINGS
SEE ROOFLINE ELEVATION CHART
FOR FACADE 'D'
WALL PLANE PROJECTIONS OVER 4'-0"N/A N/A N/A -
14.3%
14.3%
14.3%UNION OAK FOOD MARKET1500 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840(POST OAK MALL, BLOCK 2, LOT 1, ACRES 2)PROJECT #:2022-05-02
DRAWN:SBK
CHECKED:SWT
DATE:03/24/23
1 04/25/23
REVISIONS:
03/24/23
THESE DOCUMENTS AND DESIGNS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND NO PART
SHALL BE COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT
HIS WRITTEN PERMISSION. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS IN WHOLE
OR IN PART IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
ALL COPY RIGHT LAWS ARE APPLICABLE.
&23<5,*+7$//5,*+765(6(59('
STERLING & KAP ARCHITECTS
2416 COLUMBUS AVENUE
WACO, TEXAS 76701
P: 254.756.2311 F: 254.756.2577
www.sterlingandkap.com
1220 AUSTIN AVE
WACO, TX 76701
P: 254.400.2572
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 05/25/23
1.4
FACADE 'D'
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
1 FACADE 'D' (LEFT SIDE ELEVATION) - ARCHITECTURAL
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 FACADE 'D' (LEFT SIDE ELEVATION) - FULL COLOR
1/8" = 1'-0"
Page 20 of 26
7' TALL ENCLOSURE
- 8x8x16 SPLIT-FACE CMU
- STONE EXTERIOR
- PAINT IBIS WHITE (SW 7000) INSIDE5'-0"4'-0"1'-0"6" DIA. PIPE BOLLARD
FILLED W/ CONC. @ 54" TALL
12'-0"4'-0"4'-0"4'-0"12'-0"4'-0"4'-0"4'-0"5'-0"4'-0"
12'-6"10'-4"12'-912"14'-212"SOLID METAL GATE
6" DIA. PIPE BOLLARD
FILLED W/ CONC.
@ 72" TALL
6" DIA. PIPE BOLLARD
FILLED W/ CONC.
@ 72" TALL
6" 3000 PSI CONC.
PAD W/ #3 @ 18" O.C.
4'-4"3'-8"6'-0"
SOLID METAL GATE
6" DIA. PIPE BOLLARD
FILLED W/ CONC.
@ 72" TALL
1'-0"12'-0"1'-0"1'-0"12'-0"8'-10"
#5 VERT. @ 48" O.C.
& AT CORNER -
FILL CELL W/ CONC.
1 DUMPSTER PAD AND ENCLOSURE PLAN
1/4" = 1'-0"
2.1
4
2.15
2.1 3
2.1
6
SOLID METAL GATE
1'-6"
10'-0"
2 DUMPSTER PAD DETAIL
1/4" = 1'-0"
6" PIPE BOLLARD
FILLED W/ CONC.
CONCRETE 6" 3000 PSI CONC.
W/ #3 @ 18" O.C.B.W.
6" PIPE BOLLARD
FILLED W/ CONC.
8x8x16 SPLIT FACE CMU - PAINT IBIS WHITE (SW 7000)
4x8x16 SPLIT FACE
CMU CAP - PAINT
8x8x16 SPLIT FACE
CMU - PAINT
#5 VERT. @ 48" O.C.
FILL CELL W/ CONC.
(2) #5 TOP & BOTTOM
W/ #3 STIRRUPS @ 18" O.C.
STONE MASONRY
AREA RESERVED FOR THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION UNION OAK FOOD MARKET1500 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840(POST OAK MALL, BLOCK 2, LOT 1, ACRES 2)PROJECT #:2022-05-02
DRAWN:SBK
CHECKED:SWT
DATE:03/24/23
1 04/25/23
REVISIONS:
03/24/23
THESE DOCUMENTS AND DESIGNS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND NO PART
SHALL BE COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT
HIS WRITTEN PERMISSION. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS IN WHOLE
OR IN PART IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
ALL COPY RIGHT LAWS ARE APPLICABLE.
&23<5,*+7$//5,*+765(6(59('
STERLING & KAP ARCHITECTS
2416 COLUMBUS AVENUE
WACO, TEXAS 76701
P: 254.756.2311 F: 254.756.2577
www.sterlingandkap.com
1220 AUSTIN AVE
WACO, TX 76701
P: 254.400.2572
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 05/25/23
2.0
DUMPSTER
ENCLOSURE
Page 21 of 26
AREA RESERVED FOR THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION UNION OAK FOOD MARKET1500 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840(POST OAK MALL, BLOCK 2, LOT 1, ACRES 2)PROJECT #:2022-05-02
DRAWN:SBK
CHECKED:SWT
DATE:03/24/23
1 04/25/23
REVISIONS:
03/24/23
THESE DOCUMENTS AND DESIGNS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND NO PART
SHALL BE COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT
HIS WRITTEN PERMISSION. UNAUTHORIZED
DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS IN WHOLE
OR IN PART IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
ALL COPY RIGHT LAWS ARE APPLICABLE.
&23<5,*+7$//5,*+765(6(59('
STERLING & KAP ARCHITECTS
2416 COLUMBUS AVENUE
WACO, TEXAS 76701
P: 254.756.2311 F: 254.756.2577
www.sterlingandkap.com
1220 AUSTIN AVE
WACO, TX 76701
P: 254.400.2572
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 05/25/23
2.1
DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
ELEVATIONS
Page 22 of 26
Page 23 of 26
Page 24 of 26
Page 25 of 26
Page 26 of 26