The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/09/2014 - Regular Agenda Packet - Parks Board (2)-4-fr' CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA TUESDAY DECEMBER 9, 2014 REGULAR MEETING - 7:OOPM Wolf Pen Creek Green Room 1015 Colgate College Station, TX 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Meeting. 1. Call to order and Roll Call. 2. Possible action concerning requests for absences of members. 3. Hear visitors. 4. Consideration, possible approval, and discussion of minutes from the meeting November 18, 2014. 5. Discussion and possible action on a Senior Advisory Committee application from Margaret Carmichael to serve a second term on the committee. 6. Discussion and possible action on a Senior Advisory Committee appointment of chair and vice chair. 7. Discussion on possible FY 15 Bond Projects. 8. Update on the Fun for All park. 9. Report, possible action, and discussion concerning the current Capital Improvements Program: ➢ Park Projects Summary > In Process Park Projects > Completed Park Projects > Presentation, discussion and possible action on the BCS Jones -Butler project. > Dedications of Less than Five Acres None for this month's meeting. 10. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on future agenda items: A Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. > Next Regular Meeting - January, 2015 11.Adjourn. The building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made at least 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.00v. Notice is hereby given that a Regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board of College Station, Texas will be held on the 9th day of December, 2014. For the meeting to begin at 7:00 p.m. at the Wolf Pen Creek Green Room, 1015 Colgate, College Station, Texas, 77840. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the 5th day of December, 2014, at 5:00 p.m. Ci . ge Station, Texas BY: BY: Kelly Templin, City Manager Sherry Mashb Q► ity Secretary 1, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board of the City of College Station, Texas is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that 1 posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas and on the City's website, www.cstx.aov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on December 5, 2014, at 5:00 p.m., and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours proceeding the scheduled time of said meeting. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA TUESDAY NOVEMBER 18, 2014 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — 7:OOPM Wolf Pen Creek Green Room 1015 Colgate College Station, TX 77840 Staff Present: David Schmitz, Director; Rusty Warncke, Assets and Project Manager Heather Lupoli, Board Secretary; Gerry Logan, Special Events Supervisor; Kelly Kelbly, Recreation Manager Board Present: Debe Shafer, Chair; Sherry Ellison, Vice Chair; David Sahm; Douglass Kingman; Gary Erwin; Louis Hodges; Marc Chaloupka; Shawn Reynolds Visitors: Brianne Jones 1. CaII to order and Roll Cali. The meeting was called to order with a quorum present at 7:01 PM. 2. Possible action concerning requests for absences of members. An absence request was received from Kris Walker. Marc Chaloupka made a motion to approve the absence requests and Shawn Reynolds seconded the motion. The vote was called. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. 3. Hear visitors. Hearing none, this item was closed. 4. Consideration. possible approval. and discussion of minutes from the meeting October 14, 2014. Gary Erwin made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted, and Lou Hodges seconded the motion. The vote was called. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. 5. Update on upcoming events such as Christmas at the Creek, Bryan -College Station Christmas Parade, Jingle Bell Fun Run and the B/CS Marathon from Gerry Logan. Informational item only, no action was taken 6. Discussion on our current and future teen programs. Presented by Kelly Kelbly. Informational item only, no action was taken 7. Report, possible action, and discussion concerning the current Capital Improvements Program: Informational item only, no action was taken The building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made at least 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.00v. > Park Projects Summary ➢ In Process Park Projects > Completed Park Projects ➢ Park Zone Balances > Dedications of Less than Five Acres ➢ Lakeridge Townhomes Phase 3-R (Neighborhood Zone 7, Community Zone B): this multi -family site plan revises what was previously approved for this phase. The original Phase 3 site plan had 115 units, which has been revised to propose 93 multi -family units. There are 30 units already under construction. The site plan is near approval and parkland fees will be paid prior to issuance of building permit. ➢ The Barracks II Subdivision (Neighborhood Zone 15, Community Zone B): this preliminary plan expands the proposed development by adding a 29-acre tract to create 64 additional townhouse Tots and 3 multi -family tracts near Deacon Drive West and Holleman Drive South. The Parks & Recreation Advisory Board recommended to accept 2.33 acres (1.96-acre and 0.37-acre tracts) of neighborhood park land dedication at their September 9, 2014 meeting. The applicant has indicated that they plan to construct neighborhood park improvements to get credit for neighborhood parkland fees. The proposed Preliminary Plan is scheduled for consideration at the November 6th Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Land dedication will take place with a future final plat and payment of Community Park fees will occur with the final plat for the proposed townhouse final plats and with building permit for the proposed multi- family tracts. 8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on future agenda items: A Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. > Next Regular Meeting - December 9 > Upcoming events: o November 18 & 20- RPTS 320 Event Management Presentation 4-5:15 PM. o Christmas at the Creek- December 5 and 6 o Bryan College Station Parade and Jingle Bell Fun Run- December 7 o B/CS Marathon- December 14 o 20+ Years Employee Service Awards with City Council- December 18 > Update on Play for All > FY 15 Bond projects 9. Adiourn. Sherry Ellison made a motion to adjourn the meeting, and Marc Chaloupka seconded the motion. The vote was called. All were in favor, and the meeting adjourned at 7:56 PM. Notice is hereby given that a Regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board of College Station, Texas will be held on the 18th day of November, 2014. For the meeting to begin at 7:00 p.m. at the Wolf Pen Creek Green Room, 1015 Colgate, College Station, Texas, 77840. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the day of , 2014, at p.m. City of College Station, Texas BY: Sherry Mashbum, City Secretary 1, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board of the City of College Station, Texas is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas and on the City's website, www.csbc.uov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on , at , and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours proceeding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: Dated this day of , 2014. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS BY: STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS Subscribed and swom to before me on this the by day of . 2014. Notary Public — Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION December 3, 2014 Dear Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Members, The Parks and Recreation Department has received an application from Ms. Margaret Carmichael for the Senior Advisory Committee. I would like to ask for your approval to appoint Ms. Carmichael for a second term on committee. Her application is attached for your consideration. Sincerely, Marci Rodgers, CSA Senior Services Coordinator the heart of the Research Valley P.O. BOx 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77842 979.764.3510 C1Tv OF COLLEGE STAT]ON Home of Texai AiM University* PLEASE PRINT SENIOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION''` PARKS AND RECREATION 1000 KRENEKTAP ROAD I COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 (979) 764-3486 1. Full Name: I l d r t� I, I 1 " 14 r Cl L1 - �.� I I r r FIRST pp JJ r C7 MIDDLE J} ' LAST 2. Home Address: I' 3 0 I 0 C-!< /�h d 8 r'-1 (fC e f 0 (I S Q t 0 Ni STREET CITY 4. Contact : I O► r`l 9`1 D _3 - R I I S 1 1 at 5 q -'7 g Li - information HOME PHONE CELLIWORK PHONE 5. Residency : I i D Z b 1, g i 7 ,a. / /1 3 is Information VOTER'S REGISTRATION # & DOB YEARS AS RESIDENT OF CS 6. Professional: Information (1.•/Ci ZIP CODE 7, 111r�r��r UGC? , EMAIL I I CdS7-f I\p 0e k SUBDIVISION LIVING IN I Re:-1 r i k. lerA- Prsirr)t-1pa1i OCCUPATION r *If business owner, NAME OFvBUSINESS I AS -l 6vu4rd Pant_ t,^iFt'r Vcr fV f'fel$te r EDUCATION (optional) 1.)C � G. >^•q ,1 14 cy_ "tc - pr,hirie, b� i e_ iAi Please list any Boards/Commissions/Committees you currently serve on: C..l41L1011 Acf y,"ry ) sH C O frr rt1 1 l -e. G Please list any experience or interests that qualify you to serve in the positions indicated: LE. rne_r SG 0dI Prr r)C-i pCi % - t- W , f .S e-A o a t b ct r cJ s i i7 r e r Y r e a V r, I is t- e_ C r 8 K ,L i I a i• �� r y d 1114...5 e- r 5 i. V Et,r V (� r Q r t (� ( 4- r , q tr-I �o r 1I- t1 Yu� / V -a-S.; d -fc-h 1 h� cT`�"r (i 1l d / 51414 Cl c y"1 f5 q I 1 h 1i k 4 � P1 n YP_r c r' VI **All applicants must be a College Station Residpt & Registered Voter /i � ct l t E� �Yr�L i Gi-c>c/ 1 / 6 SIG AT RE OF APPLICANT DATE IrirE1lbr'i 2015 Bond Election Time Line Date Activity April 2014 Kelly to meet with the Mayor to discuss the process Presentation to Council on the proposed location May 2014 of facilities to be included in the FY 2015 Bond Election May 2014 Presentation at Management Team June 12, 2014 Council Presentation on the schedule and (1st meeting in June) proposed citizen committee September 2014 Advertisement of Citizen Committee December 2014 Present staffs recommended transportation projects to the CTC December 2014 Present staffs recommended transportation projects to P&Z December 2014 Present staff's recommended park projects to Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Notes • She may have some ideas about the committee • Do we want Council input on this issue, or do we want a Council subcommittee to be involved throughout this process?? • Discuss the process and time line. • Chuck to prepare and deliver presentation • Ask Council to take formal action to move forward with the bond and get Council feedback • Committee o Committee of 30 or less o School District Representative? o Member of Council? 0 2 P&Z members? 0 2 Parks Advisory Board members? o Graduate of Citizen's University? o Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Greenways Committee? • Committee Chair o Council appointed or committee appointed? • Chris to coordinate with CSO • CMO and CSO to develop application Donald to prepare and deliver presentation Donald to prepare and deliver presentation David to prepare and deliver presentation 17 November 2014 December 18, 2014 Council presentation of staff's recommended (Only meeting in Dec.) projects December 18, 2014 (Only meeting in Dec.) City Council appoints CAC January 2015 Kick off Meeting with Entire Committee January 2015 First subcommittee meetings February 2015 Community Meeting on Transportation Projects February 2015 Community Meeting on Parks & Recreation Projects February 2015 Community Meeting on Facility Projects February — May 2015 CAC Meetings David & Donald to prepare and deliver presentation. Support from Jeff, Eric, J. Capps, & Chuck • Aubrey to Coordinate with the CSO • Selection of CAC Chair and Vice Chair • Engage Public Communications • Establish a Sunset Date for the committee • Jeff to provide a budget overview • Discuss the role of the committee • Discuss Schedule for entire process • Provide the subcommittee chair with suggestions/ideas to allow the committee to rank the projects. • Public Communications to attend • Select subcommittee chair • Review/Discuss project identified by staff • Jeff to provide a budget overview • Donald to prepare and deliver presentation • Public Communications to attend • Include suggestion box and website info • Jeff to provide a budget overview • David to prepare and deliver presentation • Public Communications to attend • Include suggestion box and website info • Jeff to provide a budget overview • Chuck & J.Capps to prepare and deliver presentation • Public Communications to attend • Include suggestion box and website info • Donald to meet with transportation subcommittee. • David to meet with parks subcommittee • Eric, J. Capps, & Chuck to meet with facilities subcommittee • Provide the subcommittee chair with suggestions/ideas to allow the committee to rank the projects. • Committee to discuss and rank projects • Public Communications to attend 17 November 2014 May 2015 CAC to present CAC's recommended projects to Council June — July 2015 Present CAC's recommended transportation projects to P&Z June —July 2015 Present CAC's recommended park projects to Parks & Recreation Advisory Board August 2015 Council adopts ballot language August — November 2015 Voter Education November 2015 Election • Presentation made by Committee Chair • Public Communications to attend Presentation made by Committee Chair Presentation made by Committee Chair Jeff to sponsor the agenda item Jay to take the lead with support from Donald, David, Chuck, Eric, J. Capps, etc. 17 November 2014 Project Update As of December 1, 2014. 1. Veterans Shop Expansion — Building arrived on site 12/1/14. Contractor started erecting the building on the same day. Work will continue with various trades involved. 2. Veterans Shelter — Project is 100 percent complete. Punch list was completed the week of Thanksgiving. 3. Raintree — This project is complete as well. The contractor will work on the Punch list over the next few days. Punch list is small, so the contractor should be out within a few days. 4. Festival site Outlets — Josie and I are waiting on paperwork from Dailey. Once we have that, we will go to contract. Still expected to start after the first of the year. 5. Festival Site Restrooms — Waiting on Council approval (December 18th meeting). Once that happens, the restroom will go into production. 6. 502 Boyett — Bid opening December the 5th at 2pm. 7. Southwood Curb painting and speed bumps —Precision will start work at the end of the week, weather pending. I will start this week as well gathering quotes for speed bumps that Park staff will install at a later date. 8. Thomas/ Bee Creek Project — I will call for a Pre -Construction meeting next week. Submittals have been approved. I will also give Dudley the Notice to Proceed letter at the conclusion of the preconstruction meeting. 9. Allison and EPICS — The group continues to add points and update the data base. There is a tentative meeting/presentation scheduled for the week of December 8th. Once I have a firm date, I will let you know. 10. Georgie K Fitch — I met with Leigh Walden the week of Thanksgiving. Leigh is in the process of designing us a play scape that will fit into our current fall zone. Leigh will also provide us a turnkey price on the project since Fun Abounds is a Buy Board provider. 11. Jack and Dorothy Miller — This Park is next on the list. The scope of work for this park is rather large. The surfacing is up for replacement, along with the track surfacing. With the surfacing up for replacement, we will explore options of two new play units for this park. (*AA' CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Tezas A&M University' FOR OFFICE U E ONLY +� CASE NO.: } — t/�, DATE SUBMITTED: "� '- [14 TIME: STAFF: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION PLANNED DISTRICTS (Check one) ❑ ($1,165) Planned Development District (POD) ❑ ($1,165) Planned Mixed -Used Development (P-MUD) ❑ ($315) Modification to Existing PDD or P-MUD Amendment - Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council Review Please use Concept Plan Minor Amendment Application for minor amendments as per Section 3.4.J of the UDO. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: tx$315 -1,165 Rezoning Application Fee. Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. El Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request. ❑x One (1) copy of a fully dimensioned Rezoning Map on 24"x36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights -of -way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. 0 Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). 0 A CAD (dxf/dwg) - model space State Plane NAD 83 or GIS (shp) digital file (e-mailed to PDSDigitalSubrnittal@cstx.gov). J Six (6) copies of the Concept Plan on 24"x36" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO. EI One (1) copy of the Concept Plan on 8.5"x11" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO. ❑x The attached Concept Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off. NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference NAME OF PROJECT Jones Butler Apartments ADDRESS 1800 Wellborn Road, Wellborn Road, Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, and Wellborn Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Crawford Burnett, Tract 61, 62, 66, and 165 GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY IF NOT PLATTED: Located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Wellborn Road (FM2154) and Harvey Mitchell Parkway South (FM2818). TOTAL ACREAGE 36.86 acres Revised 4/14 Page 1 of 7 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Mitchell & Morgan, LLP C/O Veronica Morgan, PE E-mail Street Address 3204 Earl Rudder Freeway South City College Station Phone Number 979-260-6963 v@mitchellandmorgan.com State Texas Zip Code 77845 Fax Number 979-260-3564 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name BCS Jones Butler 37.26, LP Street Address 7904 North Sam Houston Parkway West, 4th Floor City Houston Phone Number 713.690.0000 OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. Name Caldwell Companies C/O Clint Cooper Street Address 1700 Research Parkway, Suite 110 City College Station Phone Number (979) 260-7000 State Texas Fax Number E-mail ccooper@caldwellcos.com Zip Code 77064 project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.): E-mail ccooper@caldwellcos.com State Texas This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated 6✓25/2014 of the Brazos County Official Records. Existing Zoning GS and M-2 Present Use of Property Vacant - Undeveloped Proposed Use of Property Multi- Family Proposed Use(s) of Property for PDD, if applicable: Multi -Family Zip Code 77845 Fax Number .Z8 L - U0'4 ' (p1o'1 and recorded in Volume 12106 Page 015 Proposed Zoning PDD W R-4 basis & Controlled density) t4(60 Un4. Ma.x P-MUD uses are prescribed in Section 6.2.C. Use Table of the Unified Development Ordinance. If P-MUD: Approximate percentage of residential land uses: N/A Approximate percentage of non-residential land uses: N/A REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The property is currently zoned general suburban (GS) and Heavy Industrial (M-2), both of which are no longer compatible with the developments that have been constructed around the subject property. Revised 4/14 Page 2 of 7 2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. The land use plan currently shows this property designated as U - Urban. This zoning change request is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. 3, How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The property is currently zoned general suburban (GS) and Heavy Industrial (M-2), both of which are no longer compatible with the developments that have been constructed around the subject property. It would be more appropriate for this property to be used as planned in the approved Comprehensive Plan. 4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The U- Urban category shown on the Land Use Plan is meant to accommodate multi -family housing, especially in a fashion that is more dense than GS - General Suburban would allow. The property and its proximity to TAMU and the surrounding street infrastructure is ideal for a multi -family project. 5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The property with its proximity to the railroad track is suitable for heavy industrial but by the same token its proximity to the park and student housing makes it unsuitable for heavy industrial users. The U - Urban category shown on the Land Use Plan is the most appropriate land use for this property. 6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The property is not marketable for heavy industrial uses nor the single family (GS) general suburban uses. The uses surrounding this properly are mainly student housing and locating single family housing at this location would not sell well unless it was marketed to students. Also development of the property as General Suburban (GS) would have this property developing at a density much less than what is desired for student housing this close to Texas A&M University. 7. List any other reasons to support this zone change. it is in compliance with the Land Use Plan and promotes higher density student population in proximity to the Texas A&M University Revised 4114 Page 3 of 7 8. State the purpose and intent of the proposed development. The purpose of the development is to provide student housing close to the Texas A&M University Campus. CONCEPT PLAN SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1. What is the range of future building heights? The units will have a maximum building height of 45 feet, while the maximum height of the clubhouse is 55 feet. 2. Provide a general statement regarding the proposed drainage. The drainage from the project will enter the two existing ponds on the property and be detained before leaving the property boundary. We will be making modifications to the ponds to allow them to act as detention. We will also be asking to reclaim a portion of the 'flood prone" area. This property that we are designating as "flood prone" is located in a Zone X area on the FEMA FIRM map panel 48041C0305F. 3. List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought. 1.The projectOvycontain one, two, three, four, five and six bedroom units onsite and the units 'nape ranted by the bedroom. l 2. We would also ask to be allowed to construct the buildings with a 10 foot separation between each building. 3. Allow for block length variances along Wellborn Road, FM2818 and Jones -Sutler Road. 4. Allow for single detached units and duplexes to be constructed within the PDD (R-4 based) category. 4. If variations are sought, please provide a list of community benefits and/or innovative design concepts to justify the request. The project is retaining the existing ponds and significant natural vegetation in the floodplain area to provide an amenity to the project. Revised 4/14 Page 4 of 7 5. Explain how the concept plan proposal will constitute and environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area. The project is retaining the majority of the floodplain and the two existing ponds on the property. This along with the fact that we are creating student housing in an area surrounded by student housing and planned for student housing makes it ideal. 6. Explain how the proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan has a stated goal that student housing is desired close to campus to alleviate problems with student traffic on thoroughfares further away from campus. 7. Explain how the concept plan proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development. The Concept Plan is for a multi -family development similar in nature to the three developments which surround this property. 8. State how dwelling units shall have access to a public street if they do not front on a public street. All dwelling units will have access to an internal parking lot with drive aisles. These parking lots will then take access to the public street system. One driveway will be taken from FM2818 and a second driveway onto Jones - Butler Road. g, State how the development has provided adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to: parks, schools, and other public facilities. The project will include public utilities and will contribute to the parks system by contributing, per City ordinance (foes/land) to parkland for this park zone. Revised 4/14 Page 5 of 7 10. Explain how the concept plan proposal will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially Injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The concept plan provides for student housing similar to other developments In the area. This use and density of development can be handled by the current Thoroughfare system and utilities in the area. The project will comply with all safety and welfare ordinances of the City. 11, Explain how the concept plan proposal will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation In the vlcinIty, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonable anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and (and uses In the area. A traffic Impact analysis has been performed for this project and it illustrates that the site traffic can be adequately and safely handled on Jones -Butler and the surrounding street systems. As part of the PDD Zone, we are requesting to limit density to 450 units on the property. This will minimize the traffic impacts from the development. Jones Butler has bike lanes and sidewalks to help with bike and pedestrian traffic to the University. Please note that a "complete site plan" must be submitted to Planning & Development Services for a formal review after the "concept plan" has been approved by the City Councll prior to the issuance of a building permit - except for singte- family development. The applicant has prepared fhls application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete, iP THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. if there is more - - than -one owner; -all- owners -must sign -the -application -or the -power ofattomey.-if theowneriss-company,-the-epplicattan must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. fr Signn t re and title Date Revised 4114 Pape 8 of 7 MI`Cr1HH. MORGAN Jennifer Prochazka, AICP Principal Planner City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 RE: BCS JONES BUTLER (REZ) — WAIVER REQUEST Dear Jennifer: November 17, 2014 We are requesting a PDD rezoning for the subject property. We would like to use the R-4 zoning district as our base zoning for this PDD. We are asking for the following bulk or dimensional variations: Block Length Waiver We are requesting a block length waiver for the property. We understand that we do not need to request a block length waiver for Wellborn Road because of the location of the railroad. However, we are requesting this block length waiver for all other property boundaries (i.e. FM 2818, Jones -Butler and our northern property line). This property contains a significant area that is inundated with stormwater during the 100-year storm event. It currently is designated as Zone X on the FEMA FIRM map panel 48041C0305F. This flood prone area, along with the fact that this property is the last to develop in the area bounded by Holleman Drive, Wellborn Road and FM2818 and all other developments have set the block length standard, is why we are asking for this waiver. The block length requirement imposed on this property does not seem to make sense when it is a multi -family product that will have internal sidewalks and drives that connect to the street systems at the entrance drives. As for vehicular movement, there is not an adjacent development that has "stubbed" out access to this property to meet a lesser block length. In addition, TxDOT will allow us only one driveway curb cut onto FM2818, so meeting block length along that roadway will be problematic. Although not a public street connection, this development will have one driveway to Jones - Butter which will provide access for both vehicles and pedestrians to the public street and sidewalk system on Jones Butler Road. Unit Types The product we are proposing has a mix of unit types and bedroom counts. It is a mix of building sizes and styles with a bedroom mix ranging from two to six bedroom units with an average of 4.25 bedrooms/unit. There will be several single detached units as well as duplexes constructed within this PDD (R-4 based) category. This product is one that is gaining popularity in many college towns. The increased bedroom count allows for a more affordable product for students. In this case, the increased density from these bedrooms is appropriate given the location is within biking distance from the University. The desire in the City of College Station Comprehensive Plan has always been to increase student housing densities closer to campus to help with traffic congestion in the City. This increased bedroom mix will encourage this. 3204 EARL RUDDER FWY S. • COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 • r 979 260 6963 • 979 260.3564 CIVIL ENGINEERING • HYDRAULICS • HYDROLOGY • UTILITIES • STREETS • SiTE PLANS SUBDIVISIONS info®mitchellandmorgan corn • www mitchellandmorgan com Understanding that some concern may stem from the five and six bedroom units and that several ordinances, namely traffic, sanitation and parkland dedication utilize an assumed bedroom density per unit and that these higher bedroom counts might skew the results from these calculations we offer the following: 1. Sanitation — we will be providing compactors onsite which will alleviate the concern for the calculation for dumpsters based upon dwelling unit count. 2. Traffic — we have modified our traffic analysis runs to a bedroom basis instead of a dwelling unit basis. 3. Parkland — given that we would be allowed to have all four bedroom units we would be willing to pay the cost differential from the 4 bedroom/unit basis to our average 4.25 bedroom/unit basis or whatever is ultimately permitted on the site if it is less than the 4.25 bedrooms / unit. For instance: Parkland Dedication based upon 4 bedroom units 4 bedrooms * 200 units = 800 bedrooms 200 units * $1636/unit = $327,200 parkland fees due Proposed Bedrooms Onsite = 850 850 bedrooms — 800 bedrooms for 200 units = extra 50 bedrooms Assume all 4 bedroom units 50 bedrooms / 4 bedrooms per unit = an extra 12.5 units to get same # of beds without 5 and 6 bed units 13 units * $1636/unit = $21,268 extra parkland dedication fees More than 4 Unrelated Because the requested product is for more than four bedrooms, it makes logical sense that there will be more than four unrelated people in the five and six bedroom units. Our request for more than four unrelated individuals in a unit is within a PDD zoning category and this product is NOT located close to single family residential property. Although one might argue how many unrelated individuals is too many for a single dwelling unit, it is our opinion that six individuals, when each room is provided with a bathroom facility, is not too much for a shared living and kitchen space. The market which is demanding these higher bedroom count units will also demand that the shared areas be of sufficient size to accommodate the higher student population occupying the space. Really, the cap on the number of unrelated persons per unit in a multi -family development stemmed from a health and safety issue. Namely, could a one bedroom unit with one bathroom handle five people trying to cram into that living space? The type of products offered to student housing have changed over the years and now it is very unusual to have shared bathroom facilities in the multi -family housing developments. We usually find that each bedroom has its own bathroom included. Building Separation It is our desire to have a minimum 90-foot building separation between buildings. This will allow us the ultimate amount of flexibility to create shared green spaces within our development for the units to enjoy. Rationale for Request The rationale for the above requests is that we are dealing with an innovative design concept that does not "fit" with the current regulations. Students are showing that they desire living in a complex that is not a "cookie cutter" row after row of apartment buildings. This complex will have a mix of unit types, styles and sizes with centralized green spaces including the large green space shown as flood prone area. In addition, the student housing market is showing that students do not mind sharing a common living space with more students as long as they have their own private living area and bath. Increasing the bedroom density will allow for a more affordable product for the students. In addition, given the product that is being considered in this location we believe the block length requirement is really not applicable. If it were applicable, the large flood prone area and driveway spacing requirements make it difficult if not impossible to meet the block length requirements in the ordinance. Density The maximum density on the property based upon developable area is = 7 du/acre. The maximum density that we are requesting on the property based upon total area = 6du/acre. Sincerely, Veroniba J.B. Morgan, PE, CFM Managing Partner Cc: File REQUEST: SCALE: LOCATION: APPLICANT: PROJECT MANAGER: RECOMMENDATION: Tuesday14 (111" CITY OF COLLEGE', STATION Home of TexasA6114 University' REZONING REQUEST FOR BCS JONES BUTLER 14-00900132 GS General Suburban and M-2 Heavy Industrial to PDD Planned Development District for multi -family residential 36.86 acres 1800 Wellborn Road, and more generally located between Wellborn Road and Jones -Butler Road, north of Harvey Mitchell Parkway, being 36.86 acres in the Crawford Burnett League, A-7, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, and being the same called 14.58 acre tract of land conveyed to Cherokee Limited, recorded in Volume 323, Page 735, and the called 7.76 acre tract conveyed to Navajo Ltd.; as recorded in Vol. 337, Page 500, of the Brazos County Deed Records and the two tracts conveyed to Palomares Construction Co. called 12.58 acres, Tract 1, as recorded in Vol. 2508, Page 234, and all of called 2 acres, called Tract 2, as recorded in Vol. 2507, Page 180, of the Brazos County Official Records. Veronica Morgan, P.E., Mitchell & Morgan, LLP Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Principal Planner joochazka@cstx.gov Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request with the condition that the impacts of any floodplain alterations be contained within the subject property. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 8 December 4, 2014 3 1 AT Am WX WE A •e g .� 0 C �i b „� +K ,, �tV i �} ,�y S'i: ,`+�'i..• per:: * � ' ""�a M y Lb� � w F o _0 CD lY 7 3 ar (1)to 90 �N LJ O O j .p r0 O 3 N O� 3 00 j / A \ 7 1 ,c R - 4 la 7,2 rR On ¢ :t. it. -tif`• 11'li'�I 7iK):b:.I.B 2 +2A 26. �� • � �,-. . ;.,tip._;i: � .. 4 4- CO�Gr 1A 04aaSR a • . - - + 18 LOT!RA 2 - 4 3LOCK I )a adi- ` ,s x r 12 .j, a 2R -i. L� T' ' r iaN-L- rrk IR aR ,a • .j...; R - PDD ,R CGC CA 1 FK **-'-HARVCYMITCHELL•PWS- ." lw..r Y, \ _ sArw .r... 204FT Notification -� . GS'. C - 3__; °. Zoning Districts R-4 Multi•Famliy 13PI Business Park Industrial POD Planned Develepmern Distract R Rural R -B High Density Multi -Family NAP Natural Areas Protected WPC Wolf Pen Creek Oev. Corridor E Estate MHP Manufactured Home Park C- 3 Light Commercial NG - 1 Core Northgate RS Restricted Suburban 0 Office M- 1 Light Industrial NG -2 Transitional Northgate GS General Suburban SC Suburban Commercial M- 2 Heavy industrial NG - 3 Residential North.gate R -15 Single Family Residential GC General Commercial C - U Collage and University OV Corridor Ove(ay D Duplex CI Commercial -Industrial R & D Research and Development ROD Redevelopment District T Townhouse RP Business Park P.MUD Panned Mixed -Use Development KO Krenek Tap Overlay BCS JONES BUTLER ��' Case: REZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1 14-132 — NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: Advertised Council Hearing Date: December 4, 2014 December 18, 2014 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Property owner notices mailed: Contacts in support: Contacts in opposition: Inquiry contacts: ADJACENT LAND USES Direction North South (across Harvey Mitchell Parkway) East (across Wellborn Road) West N/A 12 None as of date of Staff Report None as of date of Staff Report None as of date of Staff Report Comprehensive Plan Urban Urban General Commercial, Urban and Natural Areas Reserved Urban, Natural Areas Reserved, and Natural Areas Protected Zoning R-4 Multi -Family GS General Suburban and M-2 Heavy Industrial PDD Planned Development District GS General Suburban and R-4 Multi -Family Land Use Apartment Complex RV Park and Industrial Sales Vacant and Apartment Complex Crompton Park and Apartment Complex DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: A small portion at the northern end of the property was annexed in 1958 and the remainder was annexed in 1969. Zoning: GS General Suburban and M-2 Heavy Industrial (dates unknown) Final Plat: Unplatted Site development: Vacant REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as Urban and Natural Areas Resented on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The Urban designation is described as a very intense level of development activities, consisting of townhomes, duplexes and high -density apartments. Natural Areas Reserved is described as being for areas that represent a constraint to development and that should be preserved for their natural function or open space qualities. These areas include floodplains and riparian buffers, as well as recreation facilities. Planning & Zoning Commission December 4, 2014 Page 4of8 The proposed PDD zoning includes multi -family housing and generally preserves flood - prone areas. At the time of site development, further drainage analysis will identify the limits of the 100-year floodplain and the impacts of reclaiming portions of the "flood prone" areas. The request is in compliance with the City's Future Land Use & Character Map. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The subject property is currently zoned GS General Suburban and M-2 Heavy Industrial, neither district is compatible with the multi- family housing that has been developed around the subject property. The proposed PDD for multi -family housing is consistent with the character and development of the surrounding properties. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed PDD zoning permits multi -family housing, as anticipated by the City's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The subject property is surrounded by multi -family development and is in close proximity to Texas A&M University. Approximately 10 acres is depicted on the Concept Plan as "flood prone" and is largely proposed to remain undeveloped. Approximately two acres along the fringes of the "flood -prone" area is proposed to be reclaimed for development. At the time of site development, further drainage analysis will identify the limits of the 100-year floodplain and the impacts of reclaiming portions of the "flood prone" areas. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property is currently zoned M-2 Heavy Industrial and GS General Suburban. Properties located to the west of the railroad track in this area have been zoned and /or developed for industrial uses since the 1950s. Because of its proximity to Texas A&M University and the growth of A&M, the area has become desirable for multi -family student housing. The surrounding multi -family development and City park make this property undesirable for heavy industrial development. Single-family is also not a desirable development type in this area, surrounded by existing multi -family housing, a railroad, and major roadways. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The applicant indicates that the property is not marketable for heavy industrial uses nor single- family uses. The uses surrounding this property are primarily multi -family student housing. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: There are existing 8- and 18-inch waterlines along Jones -Butler Road and crossing the property which are available to serve the tract. There are also 16- and 18-inch sanitary sewer lines bisecting the property. There is currently capacity in the existing sanitary sewer system to support the proposed development. Detention is required in this area, where stormwater from the site generally discharges to the east within the Bee Creek Drainage Basin. With site development, further drainage analysis will identify the limits of the 100-year floodplain and the impacts of reclaiming portions of the "flood prone" areas. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 8 December 4, 2014 A Traffic Impact analysis was performed for the development. In order to mitigate the traffic impacts of the development, Holleman Drive West at Jones -Butler Road will need to widened and restriped to provide left turn lanes on the westbound and eastbound approaches. The City is in the process of converting that intersection to a four-way stop. The applicant is also proposing to limit the number of bedrooms in the development to 850 in order to avoid additional impacts to the surrounding roadways. SUMMARY OF CONCEPT PLAN The proposed PDD Planned Development District zoning uses a base zoning district of R-4 Multi -family. Approximately eight acres of the development is intended to remain as natural open space, both as a site amenity and for the natural conveyance of flood water (ie: flood prone areas). The development is intended to provide student housing in close proximity to the Texas A&M University campus. The PDD includes a variety of unit types and bedroom counts. Meritorious modifications are included below. All other standards of the R-4 district would be met with development. Density: The maximum density on the property is 6 dwelling units/acre. The maximum density on the developable area (outside of floodprone areas) is 7 dwelling units/acre. Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis, the project is proposed to be capped at 850 bedrooms. Range of future building heights: units will have a maximum building height of 45 feet and the clubhouse will be a maximum of 55 feet. Drainage: The drainage from the project will enter the two existing ponds on the property and be detained before leaving the property boundary. Modifications to the ponds are proposed to allow them to act as detention. The applicant is requesting to reclaim a portion of the "flood prone" area. This portion of the property shown as "flood prone" is located in a Zone X area on the FEMA FIRM map panel 48041C0305F. Meritorious Modifications The following modifications are proposed through this rezoning request: Block Length: The applicant requests a block length waiver for the property. The subdivision regulations require that blocks be no longer than 660 feet in areas designated as Urban on the City's Future Land Use and Character Map. Based on this standard, a street or public way would be required along Harvey Mitchell Parkway and Jones -Butler Road. The applicant indicates that a significant amount of the property is "flood -prone" and the remainder of the area is already built out so that a street to break block length would only serve to connect Harvey Mitchell Parkway and Jones -Butler Road through this multi -family development. Block Perimeter: The applicant requests a block perimeter waiver for the property. The Unified Development Ordinance allows for a maximum 2,000 foot block perimeter in Urban areas. The Block Perimeter is the outside edge of a block, being the total of the blockfaces for each block. The subject property is the last to develop in the area where the block pattern is established. The property is bound by railroad right-of-way on two sides and is divided by a significant "flood -prone" area. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 of 8 December 4, 2014 Unit Types: The applicant requests to utilize single detached units, duplex units, and multi -family structures together on a single multi -family tract. R-4 Multi -Family does not permit single -unit structures and duplexes to be built as a part of a multi -family complex. The proposed MF Multi -family zoning district does permit these unit types as a part of a multi -family development, however this district is not yet available. More than Four Unrelated: In addition, the proposal includes a variety of bedroom counts within its units, ranging from two to six bedrooms, with an average of 4.25 bedrooms per dwelling unit. The number of bedrooms in each unit is not regulated by the Unified Development Ordinance, however it may have an effect on the number of unrelated residents that reside together in the units. The applicant states that units with increased bedroom counts allow for a more affordable product for students and is a new trend in multi -family housing in many college towns. The applicant believes that the increased bed count (and ultimately persons per unit) is appropriate based on the property's close proximity to Texas A&M University. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to locate multi -family student housing in Urban areas close to campus. The applicant requests that up to six unrelated individuals be permitted to reside within a unit in this development as it is not in close proximity to single-family residential property. The applicant has stated that each room will be provided with a bathroom facility and that the shared facilities for the (up to) six unrelated individuals would include living areas and kitchen facilities. The proposal includes an average of 4.25 bedrooms per unit with a maximum bedroom count on the property of 850. There are several standards in the Unified Development Ordinance that are determined based on dwelling unit counts instead of bedroom counts. ■ Sanitation (number of required dumpsters)— the applicant is providing compactors onsite alleviating the need for dumpsters based on a per unit count. ■ Traffic — the applicant has modified the traffic impact analysis based on bedrooms. ■ Parkland Dedication — the applicant has proposed to pay additional parkland dedication fees based on the increased beds per dwelling unit. Since the standard zoning and parkland dedication would allow up to four unrelated individuals per unit and the proposed PDD would permit an average of 4.25 beds per unit, the applicant has proposed to pay a prorated parkland fee based on the additional 0.25 persons per dwelling unit proposed with the zoning. Building Separation: The applicant requests a minimum 10-foot building separation between structures. The Unified Development Ordinance requires a minimum of 15 feet. The applicant has stated that the reduced separation will allow for flexibility to create shared green spaces within the development. Community Benefits and Additional Enhancements The applicant offers the following as community benefits and/or project enhancements: the proposal is an innovative design concept that does not "fit" into an existing zoning district. Students are showing that they desire living in a more diverse built environment. In addition, increased bedrooms per unit can provide more affordable student housing. The proposed development will have a mix of unit types, styles and sizes with centralized green spaces including the large green spaces shown as "flood prone" on the Concept Plan. The proposal also includes a bus shelter on Jones -Butler Road. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 7 of 8 December 4, 2014 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request with the condition that the impacts of any floodplain alterations be contained within the subject property. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Rezoning Map 3. Concept Plan Planning & Zoning Commission Page 8 of 8 December 4, 2014 ZONLU: m —2 LIGHT N INDUSTR16L w) A -7 l- ja� I ZONED: GS GENERAL .. RAI SUBURBAN 4: EXISTING ZONING ..00, L — -7 To —u-_- Affmi PROPOSED ZONING T.979,25o 696 .1.2W M.4 vicemiry MAP gYAWw -1411" 11-10f 0 T 99 M 6963 f 9�9 260 356! auae sn�in�H� nameumaew I \ / Lot 1 Holleman Arms Apartments °wry/ � Vol. 2948, Pg. 89 � �~ v P7 1. wery RY of R IW4 rA ,>,m,r„r,rh \•' ... :'::`':i ` \ r ff I Mr 1].. Gh N as bp_vrk MPtw..n tmn .., ..... i>,� i Cherokee Limited b mw. ... ` ~'.. i ce', .•i %�'. G, eu`w".r,e,w. w ie.r a•"'• \ f ;/ 14.55 acres •`I,; <. �:.it!if 1 ,• .r w. A 1 (J Vol. 323. Pg. 735 Vol. n 1. ,. .,. . ..... i ...; ..::'}G,`'�..:',.:j_•,,:. eo♦ Tw International W ( ondoned)/-'..,\ cw : °: i-:,.:rf': t •ti _ i `... y, r •'Y•, •,ft Vol. 24.aPg -of-Way ` �IEs1�� •sY ""� ye''�� at Northern N J _ 1 I I fa _ F f 1 •� Rj 1 d,r Palomar - Co Company - x.r.:� ��r^� _ • �° �.�: I I �4, 1 � / nstruction 1258 O �, .. _ d a� 4 •,';-,,^'•. Vol. 2508. Pg. 23 - �_'�:. •�Cµ'�.l:s.:, rt�i:.;' ..1,t:r �.� :�ji r: .{�,;>''" / - -,?,p' 1.17 acre I&CN Railroad tract y Quit Claim to Brazos County - . _ .. :��t ��Vol.' 2$, P�'-be9.�s;+rs{+er]'nk, ;faeue.laeri;�+rf,r ��r ',, �_ ✓�'v'',.f+✓',•,, '"+.,�, a.. - ,, Voi. 272, Pg. 425 _ :. -. ... , rri. �• , � : �. - �,.r:' i. - .� is _ . -IrT: ,=i?M'.+'l; a k IiN 41 x'I,W"awi.w Me. r•]^,.r :';I' >a•j_i, �:-I ,. - v'L x"4�,.s ,aa. ':: ;�,'1,� ✓S � � � ,; :rt,'...� o..e..- '> w, „4 �'- , , - a - ;, '- _, � -.; -I • .. /a '� " a : 1'4'I i �iilAl' � I.. � ji '•• '� .. S- ��,. �.•.ar e.i;rYe.•t (pay �1, � '�� q',Ij 1'i;^��.++''�. =:,,d„�•= _ _ -- ,....., ..-.. ,—_ � �..,., :� 3!L riy_•C.a�s :i�oesd'1 -yi •.••.'-•J:` 3�Y a_1e re-,=.. Sj..i;:N`j�'}I g��(;:,r�i ;.:.,a';,� `:,'•, \ Yl _--------=g--- -- —--------�-- eyW------- n_>..--��'�v>•oi t''tk:lhyy4+, '�a:shc'•,. \ o s I Mohawk Parcel - 1.49 ac. e0' swp - a..ie n. �,te. IS H,4i ^ r' - - ?.� w••wr . wr nee r+. a.. w<1 uew �iw, eiiz. ergs ee I i ..=` y . .>< .. a,`s v�rw (,era�Novajo, Ltd. ve e -- - a ---- a DrwM.-.,-wwas "I:�/ — — — — _ Y• k'�\ �'i�'.•�,i4; 7.76 sJ>.,s• Vol. 337 R1,2]ee> Pg. 5001eqPzstyaby awe'u4. ---------------- , ----1 be,,w e- xe,YJT rit°a,°',00.00'' ° l l I \ I 170' I&GN Railroad R O.W. C� I Quit Claim to Brazos County \ \ Fairfield Pinnacle, Ltd I Vol. 272, Pg. 425 ~� 15.321 acre, Vol. 3513, Pg. 172 � JOE ORR, INC. F svwrr roxs rw aru Holle�l on Village Addition I I ` xta> rosxawc ,sat , $ection Two I Cg1zraeeoe, . m.s VQI. 14529, P 179 I TLS Propert.ies, Ltd. 9°-•- 9 134.041 acres BOUNDARY SURVEY — IdeGN ROW AND I I Holleman Village Addition I I Vol 3022, Pg. 187 REMAINDER OF MOHAWK LTD, TRACT --_- - . '- �--------- ---- I Lot 2 — Block "A•' I ,,,� CRAWFORD BURNER LEJGUE A-7 I Vol. 3613, Pg 285 I I w M = COLLEGE STATION, TOLAS I I I I �� rye• wro v. u4m al I I al� I I ' Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Attendance for Feb. 2014- January 2015 Date 8/12/2014 9/9/2014 10/14/2014 11/11/2014 12/9/2014 1/13/2015 Meeting Location Green Rm Green Rm Green Rm Green Rm Green Rm Green Rm Meeting Type Regular Regular Regular Regular Regular Regular Meeting Status HELD HELD Debe Shafer, Chair P P Sherry Ellison, Vice Chair P P David Sahm EX UX" Douglass Kingman P P Gary Erwin P P Kris Walker P EX Louis Hodges P P Marc Chaloupka P P Shawn Reynolds P P� E — Excused Absence — An absence request submitted. Legend: U — Unexcused Absence — No request for absence was received. P = Present N/A - No quorum present or required (this was either a subcommittee meeting, X = Absent U = Unexcused park ceremony, dedication, or a public hearing for which an agenda was posted. E = Excused