Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/10/2001 - Regular Agenda - Parks Board
Call to or&n 2. Swearing in of new members. 3. Hear visitors. Pardon — Consider requests for absences of members from meeting. Approval of minutes ftom regular meeting of June 12, 200 1. 6. Discussion, consideration, and possible action concerning a recommendation from the Senior Advisory Committee to appoint Bill Lay, Chairman Carol Parzen, Vice Chair 7. Discussion-, consideration, wnei-f possible action concerning Castlegate Park design. 8. Discussion, consideration, and possible action concerning park land dedication funds by Zone. 9. Discussion, consideration, and possible action concerning ,,using park zone money for replacement of the playground equipment at Hensel Par Dic 10. eport, discussion, and possible action concerning Veterans Park and Athletic Complex construction time line. 11, Report, discussion, and possible action concerning City Council Vfsion St, naents and ii m-plearnentation plans. 11 Discussion, consideration, and possible action. concerning a possible "bark park." 13. Discussion, cowideration, and possible appointment ofla Parks and Recreation Board member to serve on the — Fees Subcommittee — Veterans Park and, Athletic Park Subcormnittee 14. Discussion concerning orientation for all board and committee members to be held at the Cfty Council Chambers on Monday, July 30, 2001, at 6:30 p.m, 15. Report, discussion, and possible action concerning user fee study. 16. Consent items: — Capital Improvement Project Report — Next meeting date and agenda 17. Adjourn The building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To take arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (M) 1-900-735- 2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website ht(pV/www.ei.college-station.tK.us and Cable Access Channel 19. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD Regular Meeting Tuesday, July 10, 2001 Parks Conference Room 1000 Krenek Tap Road 7:00 pow. Staff Present: Eric Ploeger, Assistant Director of Parks and' Recreation; David Wood, Parks Planner; Peter Lamont, Recreation Supperhatendent; Marei JR-odgers, Senior Services Coordinator; David Gerling, Recreation Superintendent; Curtis Bingham, Parks Operations, Superhatendent, leis Lehd.-, Staff Assistant. B, ozcf d Preww'- jolan Nichols, Chair; Gleim Schroeder; Glen Davis; Dori Allison; Larnry- F&rnsmfor th; Da to Wood (Alternate). ftmn Td' ,Ton Turton; Bill Davis. George Dresser. I CnAll' ro order, The meeting was called to order at 1:00 p.m. 2. STea rning W of new members- Larry Farnsworth and, Dan Allison vm-T81 sv'lonl fil to serve on the Parks and. Recreation Board. 31 Hear visftlora.- No visitors spoke at this time. Pwdon, — ConzfldleT reqais 0or absences of men hers from meeting: Glen Davis made a motion to accept the albserices of Jon Turiton Paid Bill Davis ass excused. Glenn Schroeder seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the ,-,notion passed unanimously. 5. Appr,,.YW of ankinutes fronai Lregala r meeting of Jut, ne 12, 2001,-, 1,3'lerra S. nia-d"e a motion to arqpro,,re the .rontes of june 12, 2001. Glen D. secondled the motion, All were in favor, and the, motion passed unanhirnously. 6. Msens-sion, rind pwWble aeflon concerning a recommen&floyfa from the Senioz, Advhsory, Co-im-Pm3-Iftee to ap�pohait. — Bill Loy, Chairman — Carol! Ferzen, vlce-chair Wfarci Rodgers, the staff liaison for flae Senior Ad-vdsory Cornmittee, stated that there are currently 15 rnembers on the Coriamittee, and that Bill Lay and Carol Parzen had bath agreed to continue serving on it. Parks & Recreation Board Tuesday, July 10, 2001 Page 1 of Glen D. made a -notion to appoint Bill Lay as the Chairman and Carol Parzen as the Vice -Chair of the Senior Advisory Committee. Glenn S. seconded the motion. All were infavor, and the motion passed unanimously. 28VU1,92NOPUL.9 C13 Park 7. KID I -auql fioa, &-nd poo-sible aefloo, coynceraing Casti- d,asigu.- Eric Ploeger stated that the last time this iitern was presented to the, parks and Recreation Board T>,vas ha June 2000, when the Board accepted parl-, land for the, Castlegate Subdivision. He stated that about two -years ago, the Paek Land Dedication Ordinance was updated so that the developer could, either dedicate land, where there is a development fee requirement, or dedicate money in lieu of land. Eric went on to ;may that instead of paying the required developrnentk fee, the developer also has the option to develop the park the.-melves. INA/allace Phillips, the developer of the Castlegate Subdivision, has chosen this option. Eric said that Park staff has been working with Mr. Philips on a design. Park staff and the Developutent Se-fvices Department staff- have been working on did?,o, vVill design the, park (Park staff or by Mr. Phillips). Eric stated he would be, presenting the concept, for the park design, and that no official action was, required, but azny comments that, the Board had -�,vouldbe taken back to Mr. Phillips for consideration. Eric went over a mar%,- of the property. 'He stated that Thn Crowley actually ovms the property, but the development of it has been turned over to 'Wallace Phillips. The developer's intention back in June 2000 �,,as i hat there might be a total of 57 dwelling units developed. Currently, Mr. Ph-fl-lips has platted fb4- 391 dwelling emits. He plans for the area to be single family housing, but he doesn't know the lot sizes or how many total dwelling units will end up being, developed. The Park Land Dedication Ordinance requires a dedication of just over eight acres for 757 dwelling units. Dyfin Phillips is dedicating approxim-nately 12 acres. The Parks Department is working on calculating, how much credit Nlr, Phillips would receive back uhrouglh the, Park Land Dedication Ordinance. Glen D. asked who was responsible for mahatainiing the p`k, once it was developed. Eric responded that maintenance of the park would be the .responsibility of the College Station Parks and Recreation Departnient. He went on to say that since it would be a public facility, Mr. Phillips -,"voiad be responsible for the same level of inspection and A.D.A. requirements that the City would responsible for, The Parks Department will also document the amount that it ,mould have cost the City to build the park- inn order to satisfy Mr. Phillips portion of the development fee, Glen D. asked what the amount of the dedication fee was. Eric responded that if IvL-. Phillips develops the 757 dwellhig units as originally proposed, the dedication fee would, be approximately $270,0G0, which is about what the current budget is for the proposed park. Parks & Recreation Board Tuesday, July 10, 2001 Page 2 of 8 David Wood stated that Park staff came up with two design concepts for the pad". One was a standard design for a park of this size, and the other had a few more amenities than a standard park would have. He showed t1he Board the latter of the two design concepts. The proposed park is approximately 4.35 acres and has some hytergenerational re.atures incorporated in it. Mr. Phillips would like for time park to be the focal point for the entire neighborhood. Son. e of tie mmenities in the pa-rk- 'would include > a picnic unit > basketball courts > seating, > a playground uxmit > sidewalk > a swing set > a shelter > a plaza > shade. trellis > a sculpture > tennis counts Glen D. asked if tl-,.,-ere -was a paildng area hinc-luded in the design,. David responded that there would be on -street parlding, where which is typ ical for a neighbor hood park. Glen D. asked if there would be a sand, volleyball court. Eric responded that this had nolll- been discussed with h&. Phillips, but could be. Glenn S. asked about adding more features to tine park-. David stated that with the proposed features presented, there is a possibility that the parry will go over budget. Eric added that this 'would. be a City park, so if funds become available ha the fUture, there -would be the possib- ility of using them to add additional amenities to the park. David also added that he had designed the park so that additional amenities could be added at a later time. Glenn S. asked about the possibility of incorporating bike lanes into the park-. This could preclude some of the problems with on -street parking- Eric stated that this would have: to be reviewed with the Development Services Departrnen'L Job-ii N. asked about, practice space for sports such as soccer wud solllball. He is concerned that the Pebble Creek School would be the closest area to practice on. Eric stated that at present this is the closest space, although the Department could discuss the issue with Mr. Phillips, John N. aslk-cad v7dto would be responsiJbie for narrAng the park. Eric stated that he, would -neetd to look into the -pa P'ofticy fir Iva'sw ing CEO college Stafta Far'c""fides- This was an informational iter-I onby, and no rraotion was made. Parks & Recreation Board Tuesday, July 10, 2001 Page 3 of 8 S. Discussion, consideration, and pom9ble action concerning park Iand dedlezflon ends by zone. Eric had distributed a memo to the Board that had a table of the park zones, the funds dedicated to each zone., and an explanation of the projects that the (ands are dedicated to. Glen. D. asked when, the Inds were dedicated to the specific projects. Eric responded that every year the Department turns in a Capital Improvement Project (CIP) budget that coincides with the City's budget process. The projects have to be budgeted tlu-ough the City's 'budget process irk order to leave the Binding available Loy the ffbIlowing fiscal year (October I't to September 3&). Eric added that the CIP budget had recently been submitted. He added that H. there is not a specific project, then the &mds are allocated to intergene-rational features, vilfich is a City Council priority. Eric discussed each 7,-ozqe with the Board. Glen D. asked what park land dedication fb,nds are typically used for. Eric responded that they are typically used for neighborhood park iinprmTem. ents. John N. asked the Board to keep the budget schedule in mind. ir, the future if they have specific visions for the zones. This was an irlormational item only, and no inotion was made. 9. DrdscusMon' co-i"'ISIRderation, and posAbRe actil-wo, concernihmg using paldi: Zone ioney feff repiace-z"'nent of lflbae pbnygroaod eqWpRnent at Hensel Prvk- Eric stated that lie had. met with a con-umittee :&om Texas A&M University that is try` ag- to implement an, fir-provernerft plan for Plensel Park. He said that in the early 809s the City built and funded ?,. playground at the park, and that it is now at an age where it needs to be replaced. Fie added that there are park land dedication.- Pines in that zone, but that Fank staff have been given direction to use these fbnads toward a linear park in the Northgate area. Fie said, that ,here is also the possibility of using the $50,000 replacement fimrd' that the Department cwTentfly has in its budga The Department typically replaces two playgrounds J jvgrounds a year. He Added that a budget request has been submitted to increase the, replacement. fiend by which would bring the total up to $110,000. George Dresser took the floor, He stated that he and John ISTichlols are currently serfing as Parks and Recreation Advisory Board liaisons to the committee that came up wit: approxi-niateby $56,000 to do �waricus upgrades to Hensel Park. He said that there is not enough money to replace the playground., and passed arourid pictures of the cinTent, playground unit and the decking area around it. Curtis Binghana had inspected the play growed. and gave a report on. its condition, He said that the playground unit is in poor condition, and noted some of the problems associated with it: > The spiral slide is missing. The Departmeift will not replace it because the manufacturer has gone out of lousiness and it would be very expensive to have a slide custom made. Parks & Recreation Board Tuesday, July 10, 2001 Page 4 of 8 > The barrier that closes the area off where the spiral slide was located needs to be replaced as well. Currently, it is made of plywood and one would have to Lit specially fabricated to fit the area, which would be very expensive. > A tire swing is missing. The Department will not replace it due to safety standards. > The surface is currently made of pea gravel. This presents a problem, because adding more pea gravel would damage the root systems of the trees that are inside the playground pit. He suggested moving the playground unit away from the trees if it were to be replaced, and using a mixture of pea gravel and rubber to create a softer fall cushion. George asked if repairs are done using City crews. Curtis responded that repairs and maintenance are done hi -house, but complete installations are usually contracted out. George asked how much it would, cost to replace the entire playground. Eric responded that typically replacements cost approximately $25- $30,000. George recommended that the Boaikd- find a ivay to replace the playground. John N. asked Curtis if there was a playground replacement: priority list. Curtis replied that there is a list, but he was riot stume where Hensel Park is ranked on it. Eric stated that staff would review the list and come back to the Board in August. He added that by that time, staff should have a better idea of ,Tvhat, next year's budget will look like. George said that the decking around the playground also reeds to be replaced. Glen D� asked Curtis if he thought that the playground needed to be replaced or upgraded. Curtis replied that lie felt that., it should be replaced. John N. made a -notion to direct Park staff to examium the options and conic back to the Board. Glen D. added to the motion, dhec6ng Park staff to come up with a projected cost to replace tine playground equipment and bring it up to standard. This would include replacement of the decking, the surfacing, and the playground equipment itself, Larry Farnsv/orth seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. Glenn S. added tha±, he was opposed to, using park land (dedication funds for this specific project. He realises that the playground equiprnezA needs to be repaired or replaced, but stated that every dollar that has been generated in that zone (Zone 1) has come from the Northgate area and should be used in that area. 10. Repoft, diteumosion, and pozsibRe action cancern-aing Veen null Fvn-k -airad Athletic Covnpley& flmefine. Eric stated that Bob Schmidt ften, O'Mialley Engineers submitted a tin-nelfine for the Phase I development of Veterans Park and Athletic Complex. He said that staff would try to shorten the ti mieline by work ing on some of the steps listed simultaneously (the Develqp?ieent Services and Parkz and Recreation Department trevieiv)Glen D. asked v0het projects were planned for Phase is Eric responded that planned are: > two softball fields with associated parking; Parks & Recreation Board Tuesday, July 10, 2001 Page 5 of 8 > a portion of a maintenance building; a portion of the drive leading to, and providing parking for, the Veterans Memorial area; > a restroom building; and > six soccer fields (Ttvo o.0he six soccer .11elds9 includung additional ppa. would be a paw of an add alternate plan directed, by 6ge City Council) John N. said that the Board had voted to, build tine six soccer fields, and that any add-ons would be the softball fields. (Refer to. itenn #7 of the minutes firom the regular meeting of March 6, 2001) Eric responded that lip- believes that staff had received different direction from, the Council. Glen D. suggested reviewing what was actually approved by the CoumciL Eric said that he would research the actual imotion and bring it back to the Board duning the August meeting. This was an infonniatiorial mein only, and no motion. was inade. _11116 Report, discumd1ou.., ppo@dtbae cance'lroung City coo'n"-.511 Vh-d'.rl'a Statements and Implement tion plans., Eric said that a drab of the Council Strategic Plan was included in the Board packets an that the Council would consider the plan at their roly 12, 2001, meeting. The plan is a result of the, Council Strategic Planning 'Retreat that was '.held. in May 2001, and it is driving most of the Department's workload at this thme. He said drat Vision Staternent #3 �urelating, to the Urban Forest Mainagenaent Plan) and #4 both pertain to Parks and Recreation. Eric said that one of the -strategic issues 11strategy 44) under Vision Statement #4 deals with ,-be Uniffied Development Code kTJDC). The C"ity is orking with a consultant to review, update, and rewrite all of the development codes. Included in this review is the Park Land Dedication Ordhaance. One, of the -strategic. milestones is for the Parics and Recreation Board to meet with the IUMC consultant in August to go over What effect changes in -tile WI C would have, He added that a special Ameeting -would be set up in -August to visit with the cons-ultant. 0kan D. suggested scheduling a special workishop to review the ordinance before the Board meets with the consultant. 117his was an irdorimational item only, and no notion was made. II DMseassion, consideration, and possible action coneefroung m. possibRe 'Ibark pairk' Eric said this item was requested by one of the Boar members, and the subject was also presented during a Hensel Pak meeting that he attended. Pairk staff had contacted Kathryn- Bice, the Executive Director of the Brazos Valley Animal Shelter. Ms. Bice was not able to attend the Board meeting, 'but the Department had gotten some information from h� r on the subject. He suggested asking Ms. Bice to talk about this topic at a future meetiing, which would also give staff rnore tiMe to research it. Parks &Recreation Board Tuesday, July 10, 2001 Page 6 of 8 Eric said that The Brazos Valley Animal Shelter is in the process of building a "bark park" on land in Bryan. They are fornihng a conuifittee and trying to raise fund s nds for thfD park. Laura Wood passed out infornozationi on "bark parks" that she had researched on the Internet. She suggested University Park as a potential site, because the wastewater treatment plant is in close proximity to it and the area already smells when the �vLnds change. This was an informational item only, and no motion -%,vas made. 13, Repoirt, discussion, and possible ateflon coancerniing the wise ir ft�e s-ftndy-. The Board lad', received the Executive Summary of the study prior to the meeting, Eric said that he put, this item on the agenda becalase he was unsure what the schedule would be for presenting any recomniendations to Council, Eric said that the Department has done some review work on the st-mly, but has not had the opportunity to ineet with the City's Budget Offfice to discuss 1 A rneetftng has been set with the. Budget -Manager for July 11, 2001, to come up with a plan for how the information would be presented to the City Council. Glenn S. asked of the copy that they had received was the final document. Eric responded s- pondeed that he understood tLat it vfas- ,01en D. stated that the Fees Subcommittee and staff had previously met with the consultants to go over the init-1911-11 report. He said thal at that time there were apparent errors in the report and fhe consultants were to have gone back and corrected them; it appears that those errors had not been corrected. Glen added that be had no confidence if'. the document, and that ifthis was going to be the final document, he didn't feel that tie could support it. He recommended that tune Board not accept the report. He gave an example where Girls Fastpitch was categorized as an ad-ult sport, when in fact it is a youth sport, Eric said that he understands that the document would, only be used as a tool to provide suggestions, staff would actually inake any fee recona-m endations to Council. Glen D. said that the study would also be forwarded to Council though. He added that during the subcoirunittee meeting, the consultant appeared very fi,ustrated and defensive of his methodology and of the softwe-re program, used to calculate the numbers for the study. Ile said that based upon his review of the docinw,nt, and, after meeting with the consultant, tie felt that it was not a good document. Glenn S. said that the study needs to be accurate, and ewrently -there are apparent mistakes that need to be coriected before it is presented to the CAy Council. John N. asked if staff could provide a one -page analysis of some of the issues 'chat, result from the staffs meeting with Budget. Parks & Recreation Board Tuesday, July 10, 2001 Page 7 of 8 This was an informational itera onhy, and no motionvvags made. Disclassion, cong4dea—ationg anid possible appoi`utmeat of 2 par-1l ao'W Recreadou, Beard ffflembeff to qeFr,-,)1e on: — Fees Subcou'unflftee — Veterans Park and.r%Ihlefic Subcommfttee Glenn S. volurntecred to serve on the Fees Subcormnittee and. Larry F. volunteered to serve on the Veterans Park and Athletic Cornpiex-, Subcommittee, Both positions are to replace, 31ol-ban. Crompton wifici served on those subcomrniftees. Glen D. made a motion to approve the, appohymnents. Don Allison seconded the innotion. All -,Ae.-,-, in favor, and, fhe motion passed unanimously. Glen D. added that there is also a ester Pl&n Subcommittee. There was a question as to Vhether the subcon-raittee was a standing committee, Kris Lehde will research this question and bring an answer back to the Boffd at a fixture meeting. forr F-ARR Comm'nitte�p mejnnhem f"o h'(-,jM 0 -9 , . hefldl S"t C"Ity CoaR!3Chhl TLE,�'gg."fix"L jfi,,F�V 30, gig � �.30 Pz"I.- Dlofi -z Eric said that the Board would, be re=ivLngP &,a havitation:fforn the City Secmtx,. y's Office for board and co =Aiittee orientation,, There will be an agenda, an' it is suggested that everyoiam atteri,,1 Tire Ma'ayor, City Attorney, and City Eger will hold discussions about, what roles boards and comr-n-ittees serve. There %vill also be a breakout session at the, end for the boards and cornminees to meet with respecthie staff * Jolua M and Glemn-,, S. will not be able to attend the orientation. 16. Consent items: — Capital Improvement P-inp:p05 Yreport,- Glen D. risked iff the CIP report could be categorized by status (ex. on hold, Eric said thiatt this could be done. — Next rueeting date and agenda: The next 'arks ;and Recreation Board -meeting will be held on Tuesday, August 14, 2001. Jolene N. suggested scheduling a special 't.vorkshop meefing to prioritim and strategize the Boards goals and' objectives. M Adjourn: The meeting adjourned at 9:30 pxn Parks & Recreation Board Tuesday, July 10, 2001 Page 8 of 8 5114/01 16:17 2001 Strategies By Vision Statement Priority #1 Customer Focused City Services To attract and retain professional and competent employees, we will create a motivating work environment. To ensure excellent customer service, we will provide appropriate facilifles,training, and technology. To ensure the stability of our primary revenue sources, we will focus on protecting and optimizing our revenue streams. To provide sufficient and reasonably priced power to our customers, we will seek to remain viable in a competitive environment. To provide excellent customer service to the development community, we will facilitate communication and be consistent in the application of development policies. #2 Safe, Secure and Healthy Environment To plan for College Station's infrastructure needs, we will review annexation policy and options. To protect property and life, we will provide adequate fire protection to all College Station citizens. To increase the safety and security of our streets, we will take action to promote public safety. To contribute to breaking the cycle of poverty and providing intervention for families in crisis, we will encourage holistic, multi -agency social services. To protect the environment and our residents, we will enhance explore composting, recycling, and other disposal capabilities #3 Clean Environment that Enhances and Protects the Quality of Life. To maintain the quality of our neighborhoods, we will strengthen code enforcement in residential areas. To protect urban open space that provides recreation and mobility opportunities, we will implement a greenways system. To protect the environment, we will endeavor to maintain air quality. To protect the environment, we will endeavor to maintain storm water quality. #4 Cultural Arts and Recreational Opportunities To provide recreational opportunities to all residents, we will provide interqenerational park facilities. to improve parks planning, we will increase communication between the City Council, Parks Advisory Board, and the Planning and Zoning Commission. To plan for community growth, we will maintain comprehensive parks planning processes and documentation. To provide multi -use pedestrian recreation, we will connect parks facilities through greenways and other opportunities. To improve the quality of our parks system, we will implement parks maintenance standards. To meet the needs of College Station senior citizens, -we will develop senior -oriented programs. To enhance cultural opportunities, we will work to develop a performing and visual arts center in College Station. To enhance cultural opportunities, we will expand our existing public art program. 5/14/01 16:17 2001 Strategies By Vision Statement Priority #5 Participate and Contribute to the Well Being of our Community. ITo increase communication and citizen involvement, we will facilitate neighborhood association development. To facilitate citizen participation, we will pursue methods of civic involvement. #6 Travel to, within and from the community. To facilitate travel to, from, and within the community, we will maintain a current thoroughfare plan. To improve our "bike/pedestrian friendliness," we will construct and maintain bike/pedestrian infrastructure. To improve rider convenience, reliability, and accessibilty for citizens, we will improve the public transit system. To provide for future transportation needs, we will participate in regional and intermodal transportation planning. #7 Contribute to and Benefit From Living in a Strong and Diverse Economic Environment. To provide adequate economic opportunity for our citizens, we will promote economic development. To increase the diversity of our economy, we will be proactively involved in a regional approach to airport/air transportation. To maintain and grow our sales tax base, we will proactively recruit retail businesses. To enhance College Station's tourism economy, we will evaluate policies directing the growth of this industry. #8 Live in Well Planned and Maintained Neighborhoods Suited to Community Interests and Lifestyles. To prevent residential decline and improve neighborhoods, we will create effective development policies. To ensure well planned neighborhoods, we will maintain and improve our Comprehensive Plan and development policies. To ensure durable infrastructure that meets the community's needs, we will examine and improve our infrastructure construction standards. To sustain the economic viability of all areas of College Station, we will develop a multi -year infrastructure rehabilitation plan. Re,(,)�3co 2001 Strategies Vision By Vision Statement l , 0 Q 'riority Stmt # 510 f 1 5.57 1 To ensure the stability of our primary revenue sources, we will focus on protecting and optimizing our revenue streams. 2 5.14 1 To make the best use of our resources we will continually participate in intergovernmental cooperation. 3 4.86 4 To enhance cultural opportunities, we will work to develop a performing and visual arts center in College Station. 4 4.86 7 To increase the diversity of our economy, we will be proactively involved in a regional approach to airport/air transportation. 5 4.86 1 7 1To maintain and grow our sales tax base, we will proactively recruit retail businesses. 1 6 1 4.86 1 8 ITo prevent residential decline and improve neighborhoods we will create effective development policies. To ensure durable infrastructure that meets the community ts needs, we will examine and improve our infrastructure 7 J 4.43 l 8 construction standards. 8 4.29 2 ITo protect property and life, we will provide adequate fire and ems protection to all College Station citizens. 9 1 4.29 1 3 ITo maintain the quality of our neighborhoods, we will strengthen code enforcement in residential areas. 10 4.29 4 ITo To improve the quality of our parks system, we will implement parks maintenance standards. 11 4.29 7 provide adequate economic opportunity for our citizens, we will promote economic development. 12 14.29 8 ITo ensure well planned neighborhoods, we will maintain and improve our Comprehensive Plan and development policies. To provide excellent customer service to the development community, we will facilitate communication and be consistent in 13 4.14 1 the application of development policies. 14 4.14 6 To facilitate travel to, from, and within the community, we will maintain a current thoroughfare plan. 15 4.14 6 To provide for future transportation needs, we will participate in regional and intermodal transportation planning. 16 4.14 0 7 To enhance College Station's tourism economy, we will evaluate policies directing the growth of this industry. o sustain the economic viability of all areas o College Station, we will develop a mull -year infrastructure rehabilitation 17 14.14 8 plan. 18 4.00 1 To attract and retain professional and competent employees, we will create a motivating work environment. o provide sufficient and reasonably priced power to our customers, we will seek to remain viable in a competitive 19 4.00 , 1 environment. 20 4.00 1 2 ITo plan for College Station's infrastructure needs, we will review annexation policy and options. 21 4.00 1 2 ITo increase the safety and security of our streets, we will take action to promote public safety. 22 14.00 4 ITo provide recreational opportunities to all residents, we will provide intergenerational park facilities. 23 i 4.00 6 To improve our "bike/pedestrian friendliness," we will construct and maintain bike/pedestrian infrastructure. 24 1 3.86 I 1 ITo ensure excellent customer service, we will provide appropriate facilities,training, and technology. 25 1 3.86 1 3 ITo protect urban open space thatprovides recreation and mobility opportunities, we will implement a greenways system. 26 1 3.86 1 3 ITo protect the environment, we will endeavor to maintain storm water quality. 27 3.71 4 To plan for community growth, we will maintain comprehensive parks planning processes and documentation. 28 3.57 4 To meet the needs of College Station citizens, we will develop comprehensive leisure programs. 29 3.43 3 To protect the environment, we will endeavor to maintain air quality. 30 3.43 4 To enhance cultural opportunities, we will expand our existing public art program. 2001 Strategies By Vision Statement Vision 'riority Stmt # 31 3.43 6 To improve rider convenience, reliability, and accessibilt for citizens, we will im?rove the public transit system. To contribute to breaking the cycle of poverty and proving intervention for families in crisis, we will encourage holistic, 32 3.29 2 multi -agency social services. 33 3.29 4 To provide multi -use pedestrian recreation, we will connect parks facilities through greenways and other opportunities. 34 3.29 5 To facilitate citizen participation, we will pursue methods of civic involvement. to improve parks planning, we will increase communication between the City Council, Parks Advisory Board, and the 35 3.14 4 Planning and Zoning Commission. 36 1 3.14 5 ITo increase communication and citizen involvement, we will facilitate neighborhood association development. 37 1 3.00 2 ITo protect the environment and our residents, we will enhance explore composting, recycling, and other disposal capabilities `�, The Cfty of `� CCCgo a Stra-I �100 1 M Ta3�aaC Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. P.O. Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 www.ci.college-station.tx.us MEMORANDUM TO: Parks and Recreation board FROM: Eric Ploeger, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation DATE: July 3, 2001 3, UD,ffIECC7- P&irk Laird Ded cztr➢oE Yund Repot zo oTluu y , 2001. Zone B02nee (S) 54,678 2 16,490 3 136,349 S 717,668 6 66,816 7 628,833 a 662 9 10 63,850 1l 1 27,420 Ili Comments Funds dedicated for Northgate Linear Park. Funds dedicated for intergenerationai features. Funds dedicated for Wolf Pen Creek. (979)764-3500 Funds from Sun Meadows dedication for improvements to Southwood Athletic Complex, and (Edelweiss Park. Funds dedicated for Gabbard Park and intergenerational features. Funds dedicated for Woodway Park. Funds dedicated for Shenandoah Park. Funds dedicated for Pebble Creek Park from the Stone Forest Subdivision. Nome of Texas A&M University PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CIP PROJECT LIST FY 2001 1 Brothers Park Improvements 1 Business Center Landscaping Project 2 I Castlegate Park Design 1 Cemetery Land Acquisition 3 ' Central Park Improvements 2 I Community Park Acquisition 2 I Gabbard Park Improvements 1 Hallaran Pool Filters & Coating (FY `01) 2 I High School Tennis Court Lights (FY `01) Indoor Grant Application for Joint CSISD Project 1 I Lemontree Park Playground 1 I Lick Creek Grant Application 2 I Lick Creek Trails Grant Project 2 I Lincoln Improvements Revised: July 2, 2001 Complete PK0084 In Construction GG9705 In Design Complete In Design Out to bid 7/9 In Design Suspend until 03 Complete Complete Grant Approved In Design $32,000 I `98 G.O. $250,000 G.O. 3/31 /01 7/31 /01 10/31 /01 3/28/01 I $25,587.00 GG9905 $275,000 J `98 G.O. PK0101 I $17,000 ' `98 G.O. PK9948 + $520,000 I `98 Bond 6/1/01 6/1/01 PK0102 I $78,000 I `98 G.O. I 9/30/01 PK0106 + $120,000 FY `01 J 3/31102 PK0109 $91,500 FY `01 ' 9/1/01 PK0066 I $22, 000 I `98 G.O. I 12/31 /01 I 11 /31 /01 I $21, 000 198 G.O. 1 /31 /01 1119/01 I N/A $126,265 '98 G.O. I I I I CD1292 I $90,000 FY `01 I 12101 C.D.G.B. 2 Merry Oaks Improvements 1 Merry Oaks Playground Replacement 2 Millennium Winds Improvements (FY `01) 2 Oaks Park Bridge 1 Parking Garage Landscape Plan 1 Raintree Park Improvements 3 Shenandoah Park Development Southwood Soccer Field 1 Renovation (FY `01) 1 Thomas Park Improvements 2 Thomas Pool Improvements Thomas Pool Leak Investigation & 1 Repair (FY `01) 1 Veterans Park Phase I 2 Veterans Park Water Feasibility (FY `01) 1 West District Maintenance Shop 1 Willow Branch Tennis Courts 2 Woodway Park Development Wolf Pen Creek Tree Planting In Design PK0103 $37,000 Complete PK0088 In Construction HM0104 In Design Complete Complete On Hold Complete Complete On hold Complete In Design Complete Complete Complete Negotiating Land Purchase Complete $25,000 $7,195 '98 G.O. 9/31 /01 Replacement 3/31 /01 3/28/01 Funds 6/30/01 FY '01 PK0067 $28,000 '98 G.O. C.O. PK0068 $44,000 '98 G.O. $48,000 Ded FY '01 PK9931 $84,000 '98 G.O. PK0104 $19,000 '98 G.O. PK0107 $25,000 FY '01 PK9941 $2,120,000 '98 G.O. PK0110 $25,000 FY `01 PK9927 $501,000 '98 G.O. PK0074 $125,000 DED $468,600 Zone 3 Dedication 12/31 /01 12/1 /01 4/31/01 4/6/01 5/31 /01 5/31 /01 12/31 /01 11 /31 /01 2/01 5/1 /02 10/1 /01 2/31 /01 3/1 /01 2/01 2/16/01 2/16/01 7/31 /01 3/22/01 $23,643 $28,687 $125,000 $5,491.00 (+ $1,785.00 for 1 year Maint. until March 02) O:/parks/Projects/CI P/cip2001.doc OTHERS 1 City Center Concepts Complete 1 City Hall Atrium Complete GG0102 $8,500 2 Northgate Park (FY `01) 1 Wolf Pen Creek Design Charette Complete WPC TIF Skateboard/Roller Hockey Park On Hold PK0073 $162,000 FY00 SLA Carter Creek Wastewater Training Landscape S59806 $10-15,000 Sewer Center Design Only Estimate Revenue Bond Funds PRIORITIES #1 - In progress currently or will be in progress before January 1, 2001. #2 - In progress before August 1, 2001 #3 — In progress after October 1, 2001 3/01 5/1 /01 2/23/01 9/02 5/02 $8,547.00 0:/parks/Projects/CI P/cip200l .doc Senior Services Coordinator Report June 2001 Senior Health and Fitness Day: May 30, 2001 Approximately 300 were in attendance. The planning committee is eager to plan a diffe-rent event next yeas. Most lillcelY at will includle awalk and pancake breakfast at the BraZos Center. Cc rknVater Classes: We are cuirently o5exing two beginnirig cor%-kpruter classes at tlie E)UT. We have awaiting list and new instructors are lilted up. Con -pater Club: The club maintains an average of twenty in attendance. They met on VVednesday, Jhwie 2e at the ConffeTejace Center and plan to meet next on July I I th. We hope to use the school district computer instructors as guest speak-ers. Board Ofie-niation: Discuss dates and. topics for new i-neariber orienlan'-fion. Distribute copies of Eiserffiovver report to meemf brs. Special Events: Ice Creann, Social: Julne 12'h — Only I I seniors attended. Those that were there enjoyed i-the singing of the Brazos Barbers' -hoppers and plenty ofiflue Bell ice creatri, and lemonade. ,D Ge!-orge Bush Lfbrexy Surnmer Calendar — transportation will be provided for the Classic, F-Urn Series on Thursday, July 19, 2001 Classes tour Fall: Instructors for all classes axe needed. The s6edule should be finalized by the elald of July. Any suggestions for new classes are welcome. Senior Advisory CommiRtee Regular Meeting, Monday, June 25, 2001 MINUTES Members Present: Bill Kling, Florace Kling, Mary Jo Lay, Bill Lay, James BowrAe, Befty Horne, Wendell Horne, Vallie Broussard 9 Phyllis Dozier, Ainmia Lee Fincl-4 Bill La_,ncaster and Mary Lancaster Men-ibers Absen't: Carol Parzen, Helen Siegel and Joanna Yeagger Staff Present: Hard Rodgers, Jere ay Milliman L Welcoxte: Bill Lay -called the eefing to order at 40:05arn, 11. Approval of May 21, 2001 minutes: The minutes were eapproved as circulated. 111. Introduce Summer Intenn-Jeremy Mill-iman, Marci introduaced Jeremy who will be researching grants and funding available for senior pro, grams and facilities. Fle is also worldng for other divisions within the departen as needed. IV. New Board members and recommendation for officers: The Parks and Recreation Board approved five new members -for the Senior Advisory Committee. They are Haskell Monroe, Jerry Jordan, Neal Nutall" Law a Holmes and Suzzanne Reynolds. The new members will begin In July anal serve for three ycears. Officers for the cor-nmittee will. be Bill Lay, Chaininan and Carol Parzen, Vice -Chair, Phyllis Dozier made the rnotion that the officers for the Senior Advisory Committee serve two-year terms. Annie Lee Finch seconded the i-notion. The motion passed. Bill Lay agreed to serve a second year as chairman. The recoinmendation will be sent to the Parks aind', Recreation Board. VBoard OrieWtation dates to be discussed: The new members will be brought up to date with the activities and purpose of the conarnittee ant the Pext regular eon-nilittee meeting. The coni-mittee will take the t'irst part of the meeting to orient the new members and answer any questions. "[he new members will receive -minutes firomthe past tl�ee iintonths and by-laws prior to the July 30"' inneeting, -W. Senior Friendly zkvyordd Nominetion- Kroger Signature Store: The. Cornnfittee amm-r ed the first anvaurd, to the ne Eger store can photos andt a story will be feaft,wed inthe July issum oft e- Golden Eagle. Members were encouraged to 81h attend t-Ihe June, 2 Meet ng of flhe Cithy Council at 7:007pm for the recognition of the Senior Friendly award by the Mayor. Wendell Horne spoke oft e positive focus for this tyke of recog-nition for businesses in our community. VIL Senior Services Coomil-knaltuar report: See Att-akched VI. Recognition rof nnterr ers leaving: Members leaving thm, committee were reeclognized by BiAl rLay and presented with a plaque of appreciation from the City of College stoitibn ffibrth-eir support and service onIffive Senior Azlvisor y Corri'miftee. lv,;iards were presen),ted to: Beta v and lVenark-41 1-1orne, Malry and Bill Lancaster grad James Boone, IX. Next Meeting- Mammdgq, ' i �@)L,jy 30, 20&IL .Y X. A4jo-unn. The r-neeting was ad1jou itied at I I :00,am Trish chool `"of Government & Public Service Texas A&M University Mr. Steve Beachy P.O. Box 9960 1000 Krenek Tap College Station, TX 77842 Dear Mr. Beachy: Center for Public Leadership Studies June 1, 2001 On behalf of the Eisenhower Leadership Development Program I want to thank you for participating in this semester's program. The project for the City of College Station was an interesting one for the students to work on and provided them an opportunity to develop their research and analytical capabilities, hone their writing and presentation skills, and learn to work in a group setting, among many other things. The project made it so that functioning as part of a group was notjust an academic exercise but rather one in which the group was working on a real problem for a real client. We appreciate your giving of your time and attention to the project and to the students. Students learn as much from their contact with leaders like you as they do from the projects themselves. Thanks again for helping make Eisenhower a worthwhile program. We look forward to continuing to work with you as the next Eisenhower group takes on the completion of this project. We are always interested in improving the program, and if you have time, would appreciate a letter giving us feedback on your experience with the students and the program. Sincerely, Allison Dunn Assistant Director, ELDP 4350 TAMU • College Station, Texas 77843-4350 (979) 862-8855 • FAX (979) 862-8856 9 www-bushschool.tamu.edu Executive Summary Cost of Services Study for the City -off ° College Ration, Texas Parks and Recreagion Department �... DIVIG �MANDAU_ S, INC. 2001 ' Helping Goverpment Serve the -People ti -•"�, ;C . 33601-Preston Road, _Suite 400W Dallas, TX 75240 (972) 490-9990 " The City of College Station, Texas, is a full service city government, which provides many services to its citizens and, in some cases, non-residents. As with cities throughout the United States, College Station is dealing with difficult issues in increased demands for services and increasing costs fueled by growth. In addition, the city desires to reduce the property tax on its citizens. As a result of these pressures, the city must examine all opportunities for enhanced revenues or new revenue sources to avoid reducing valuable City service levels. Accordingly, College Station engaged DMG-MAXRVfUS, INC. (DMG) to conduct a Cost of Services Study to review the City's Parks and Recreation Department current costs and policies related to the recovery of fees for services. This Executive Summary provides a summary of I)MG-MAXEIAUS' findings and potential revenue increases resulting from this study. The costs of many Parks services currently provided by the City either are or could be recovered from user fees. Revenues from user fees can be an appropriate means of achieving revenue enhancement for local government. Many times one or more of the following conditions exist before a full cost user fee study is undertaken in a city: > Current user fees are set far below the actual cost of providing the services. > No fees are being charged for services that could generate revenue. > Current fee structure and policy have not been set with full knowledge of the relationship between the value of a service and the amount of a fee. Providing certain public services at cost can have numerous benefits to the City and its citizens: > All service users, including those -exempt from property taxes, pay user fees. C, > Non-residents, - reducing the burden on City residents, pay user fees. > User fees create a "rationing" of services and allow for the measurement of demand, It is for these" 'reasons that local governments all over the United States are shifting from a near -total dependenceonproperty, sales, and income taxes for financing local services to a more broad -based revenue stream. Although there may be political reaction to increasing fees for services that were previously free or heavily subsidized, local governments are becoming aware that user charges can be a more acceptable -method of raising revenue than an increase in taxes. Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department C DMG-AdAMfUS. INC. 2001 Page I The User Fee Study presents the results of a DMG-NLkXEV US analysis of the full cost of services provided by the City of College Station, Texas, Parks and Recreation Department, for which user fees are being charged or night be considered. By calculating the full costs of these services, including an appropriate share of Citywide and departmental indirect cost, and comparing that cost to the associated revenues received, DMG-MAXEVfUS has been able to determine the amount of cost subsidy being drawn from general tax dollars in these areas. The objective of the Study was to provide cost data to be used as a basis for establishing or changing user fees. The full cost of delivering services includes direct labor costs, other direct operating and maintenance costs, departmental supervision costs, and citywide indirect costs. The study indicates that the full cost of fee related services are $2,857,559 and that $839,612 is being recovered in revenue. The subsidy currently required to support these services is, therefore, $2,017,947 as illustrated in the following graph: 0 Costvs. Revenue 7,559 Revenue In comparison to other DMG-MAXa1US municipal clients, the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department's subsidy levels are comparable. . However, DMG- MAXIMUS has identified potential areas for cost recovery to increase the charges for services, therefore increasing revenues for the City. The larger subsidy areas, in some cases, are for fee areas where the City has made a policy decision not to pursue full cost recovery. Typically, Parks and Recreation Departments subsidize certain activities (usually youth activities) while attempting to recover full costs for adult programs. Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department cC D0vfG MAXBdVS, INC. 2001 Page 2 A summary of the cost/revenue analysis and the resulting potential for increased revenues are summarized in the tables that follow. DMG-MAXIMUS identified potential for new revenues in existing fee areas of $185,151. Percent of Activity Cost Revenue Difference Cost Recovery Adult Activities $ 468,873 $ 194,065 $ 274,808' ' 41.39% Youth Activities $ 145,956 $ 31,821 $ 114,135 21.80% Aquatics $ 1,039,593 $ 348,881 $ 690,712 33.56% Rentals $ 248,718 $ 50,721 $ 197,997 20.39% Recreation Centers $ 869,971 $ 148,145 $ 721,826 17.03% Other $ 84,448 $ 65,979 $ 18,469 78.13% Total S 2,857,559 S 839,612 S 2,017,947 29.38% In addition, DMG- S identified other services provided by the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department in which no fee is currently charged, but where costing information can be used in deciding whether or not to implement new fees. The amount of full cost involved for these activities totals $484,656, and includes Soccer, Cemetery, and Little League. Although the cemetery collects revenues that are in a separate fund, the Parks and Recreation Department receives no revenues for the services provided. Non -Revenue Producing Activities Percent of Activity Cost Revenue Difference Cost Recovery Cemetery 163,773 $ - $ 163,773 0.00% Soccer a F $ 137,025 $ - $ 137,025 0.00% Little League_ -b $' 183,858 $ - S 183,858 0.00% Total S 484,656 $ - S 484,656 0.00% The current policies for the collection of fees, as identified in the City of College Station fiscal year 2001 operating budget, are as follows: Full fee support (80-100%) will be obtained from enterprise operations such as utilities, sanitation service, landfill, cemetery, and license permits. Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department cC DIIG-MAXBJUS, INC. 2001 Page 3 Partial fee support (50-80%) will be generated by charges for emergency medical services, miscellaneous licenses and fines, and all adult sports programs. Minimum fee support (0-50%) will be obtained from other parks, recreational, cultural, and youth programs and activities. DMG-MAXIIAUS, Inc. used these guidelines in determining potential areas for increased revenues. Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department C D,VIG MAXVvfUS. INC. 2001 t Page 4 U= The Executive Summary is presented in the following sections: > Approach and Methodology — A brief description of the approach and methodology utilized to develop the user fee study. > Activity Fee Studies — A summary presentation of DMG-NIAXE\4US' analysis of the cost of fee and service activities within the Parks and Recreation Department. > Benefits and Policy Considerations — A discussion of benefit and policy considerations, which should be considered in utilizing the results of a cost of services study. > Appendix — User Fee Costing Report (Under separate cover) Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department 0 D.,VfG-M4XIVfUS, INC. 2001 Page The approach and methodology DMG-N1AXM4US staff utilized in the development of indirect cost allocation plans and the comprehensive user fee study developed the fu[I costs associated with providing City Parks and Recreation services. Costs of services were not limited to direct departmental charges, but rather based on an analysis of the comprehensive costs incurred by the City in providing services. Total costs include allocation of the administrative and central support activities and other costs not traditionally assigned to departmental budgets such as building depreciation or use costs. The emphasis of this project was to comprehensively determine the costs of services and match these services to funding sources. I The Citywide administrative indirect cost used for this engagement is provided by the Full -Cost Central Services Cost Allocation Plan prepared by DMG-MA)MVIUS, INC., based on budget data for fiscal year ending September 30, 2000. This approach is consistently applied for all City departments and services, regardless of funding source and allocates costs to departments based on an objective statistic that reflects or correlates to the use of the administrative services provid e*d. IMP The primary purpose of the User Fee Study is to document the full cost of providing Parks and Recreation services for which user fees are assessed or could be assessed reasonably. This work will allow the City to make a determination of the level of tax subsidy it wants to maintain 'as a, matter of public policy in an environment where the full and actual cost of doing business is known. Fee levels then become a true measure of the City's intentions nand not simply -a combination of historical or inconsistently applied amounts. Among the tools that DMG-N4AXDAUS uses in all of its studies are the principles of governmental cost accounting. This means that a detailed and comprehensive analysis of all of the costs associated with the provision of each unit of service is completed. The study utilizes budgeted FY 2001 expenses and revenues. In order to accomplish a tailor- made cost of service/revenue analysis for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department, DUG-NlAXEYMS went through the following stages of research and analysis: Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department V D,vfG-.,WAM, fUS, INC. 2001 Page 6 > Conducted an analysis of service costs and revenues, including: • Interviews with key management and operational personnel throughout the department • Determined the full cost of each activity by identifying staff positions that provide the service, the number of units of the activity provided in a year, the amount of staff time required for each activity and related operating expenses • Determined current revenue for each activity • Processed the cost of services plan > Reviewed first drafts with department staff and incorporated revisions > Reviewed the reports with a subcommittee of the College Station Parks Board > Prepared Final Report incorporating Department Staff and Parks and Recreation Board Sub-Conunittee comments This approach results in a detailed cost of service/revenue analysis that. the City will use as a basis for restructuring existing fees and/or implementing new ones. The final results incorporate multiple iterations and fine-tuning of data. 'We believe the analysis and conclusions to be the best obtainable — the result of the cooperative efforts between DMG-NIAXEYfUS consultants and City staff Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department C DMG-A1AUWUS, INC. 2001 Page 7 I The following section presents the results of DMG-N4A' XIMUS' analysis of the cost of fee and service areas in the City Parks and Recreation Department. A description of the activities, possible full cost fee structures, and graphic presentations of alternatives are contained in this section. The detailed work papers are available in companion volumes. The Adult Flag Football Program strives to provide adults with an organized flag football league. Teams in this league can advance to the TAAF State Flag Football tournament if they qualify. This league is designed for both male and female adults age 16 and over. Each team plays in an 8 game round robin. Units for this program are identified as teams. There is a double elimination tournament at the end of the season. The Adult Volleyball Program is designed to provide adults with an organized co-ed volleyball program. Teams can advance to the TAAF State Tournament. The program is open to males and females ages 16 and older. Participation for this program is identified per individual. Each team plays in an 8 game round robin. -'There is a double elimination tournament at the end of the season. Adult Softball Leagues provide adults with an organized softball program and give them a chance to advance to the TAAF or ASA State and National Tournaments. The league is open to all males and females ages 16 and older. Each team plays 10 games per season round robin in the Spring and Summer, and 8 games in the Fall. There is an optional double elimination tournament throughout the regular season. Teams are broken into the following divisions: Men's A, Men's B, Mep's D+; Women's C, D, D+; Co-ed Super D, D+, Ct B, and Fast Pitch. Fees for this program are charged per team, however for the purposes of this study, units are identified as participants. The following ta.Ota represents:thd costs, revenues, and the percentage of cost recovery for the* fee areas mi.Mult Sr)orts._ Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department C DxI1fG-MAMiTJS, INC. 2001 Page 8 Adult Activities Cost/Revenue Analysis Percent of Cost Revenue Activity Cost Revenue Difference Cost Recovery Units per Unit per Unit Adult Flag Football $ 28,127 $ 4,080 $ 24,047 14.51% 12 $ 2,343.92 $ 340.00 Adult Volleyball $ 25,632 $ 7,020 $ 18,612 27.39% 52 $ 492.92 $ 135.00 Spring -Summer Slow Pitch $ 202,646 $ 116,280 $ 86,366 57.38% 323 $ 627.39 $ 360.00 Fall Slow Pitch $ 126,744 $ 50,400 $ 76,344 39.7.7% 160 $ 792.15 $ 315.00 Spring -Summer Fast Pitch $ 8,387 $ 2,250 $ 6,137 26.83% 6 $ 1,397.83 $ 375.00 Fall Fast Pitch $ 7,965 $ 1,625 $ 6,340 20.40% 5 $ 1,593.00 $ 325.00 Girls Fast Pitch $ 69,372 $ 12,410 $ 56,962 17.89% 1 $ 69,372.00 $ 12,410.00 Total S 468,873 S 194,065 S 274,808 41.39% In identifying potential areas for increased cost recovery, DMG-NLAXRv1US reviewed the City's fiscal policies and identified the percentage of cost recovery that is required according to these policies. For adult activities, the user fee must be set to collect between 50% and 80% of the cost of the program. Using these policies, DMG- S has created the following areas for potential increased revenues: Adult Flag Football Adult Volleyball Spring -Summer Slow Pitch Fall Slow Pitch Spring -Summer Fast Pitch Fall Fast Pitch Girls Fast Pitch .6< Total Potential Revenue Increases Total Potential Current Cost Recommended Potential Additional Cost Revenue Units per Unit Fee Revenue Revenue $ 28,127 $ 4,080 12 S 2,344.. $ 1,175 $ 14,100 $ 10,020 $ 25,632 $ 7,020 52 $ 493 $ 250 $ 13,000 $ 5,980 $ 202,646 $ 116,280 323 $ 627 $ 360 $ 116,280 $ - $ 126,744 $ 50,400 ..":160 $ 792 $ 400 $ 64,000 $ 13,600 $ 8,3.87 $ 2,250 6 $ 1-398 $ 700 $ 4,200 $ 1,950 $ 7,965 $- 1,625 5 $ 1,593 $ 800 $ 4,000 $ 2,375 $ 69,372 $ 12,410 1 $ 69,372 $ 34,686 $ 22,276 S463,873. -S 194,065 $ 250,266 S 56,201 As costs for many of`these programs are very high, it would be inappropriate to meet the guidelines set forth by the financial policies in some cases. DMG-MAXEV1US has identified the potential for increased revenues based on a 50% cost recovery, the minimum recovery rate for adult sports based on the City's fiscal policies. It would be beneficial however for the City to perform a market survey to determine what costs are being charged in competing leagues, and what price the market will bear for these activities. Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parlrs and Recreation Department C D.VIG-MkYVvfUS, INC. 1001 Page 9 The Youth Flag Football Program provides a positive experience in team sports for boys and girls and teaches them the basic skills of football. The program is open to males and females age 7 to 12 (Grade I through 6). The participants play in 8 games per season on either Monday or Wednesday, or Tuesday and Thursday, as well as Saturday morning. Each player receives a T-shirt and a trophy. Participation for this program is identified as individual participants. Fees for youth flag football are established on a sliding scale, a family with one child would pay $35, while a second child would be an additional $25, and a third child would be an additional $15. The Youth Basketball Program provides a positive experience in team sports for boys and girls and teaches them the basic skills of basketball. The program is open to males and females between the ages of 5 and 14 (grades kindergarten through 8 th ). Participants play in 8 games per season on wither Mondays and Wednesdays, Tuesdays and Thursdays, as well as Saturday mornings. Units for 'this program are identified as individual participants. Each player receives a T-shirt and a trophy. The sliding scale for youth basketball is MWMIO. The following table presents the costs, revenues, and percentage of cost recovery for youth activities: Youth Activities Cost/Revenue Analysis Percent of Cost Revenue Activity Cost Revenue Difference Cost Recovery Units per Unit per Unit Youth Flag Football S 43,592 $ 11,120 $ 32,472 25.51% 401 $ 108.71 27.73 Youth Basketball $ 102,364 $ 20,701 $ 81,663 20.22% 774 $ 132.25 26,75 Total S145,956 S 31,821 S 114,135 21.80% According to policie's set in the bud get process, youth activities require only minimal fee . I . 1:1 support (0%., to 50%) and ther4bre, DMG-MAXEvfUS has identified cost recovery at 25% in order to satisfy the fiscal requirements. Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station ParAs and Recreation Department C_D.VfG-AIAX&fUS, INC. 2001 Page 10 Youth Activities Potential Revenue Increases Total Potential Current Cost Potential Potential Additional Activity Cost Revenue Units per Unit Fee Revenue Revenue Youth Flag Football $ 43,592 $ 11,120 401 $ 108.71 $ 30 $ 12,030 $ 910 Youth Basketball $102,364 $ 20,701 774 $ 132.25 $ 40 $ 30,960 $ 10,259 Total S145,956 S 31,821 MMEM � $ 42,990 $ 11,169 Open Swim Programs provide safe, fun aquatic fun for both adults and children. Participants can choose to utilize Adamson Lagoon and Thomas Pool, which are open the last weekend of May through Mid -August; Hallaran Pool, which is open from the beginning of April through the end of September; or the Junior High School Natatorium, which is open year-round. Swim Lessons are given to provide Red Cross swimming instruction to all ages (6- months to adult) to keep them safe in, on, and around water and to know what to do in case of an emergency. Spring and Fall meet two times per week for four weeks (8 lessons). Summer lessons meet nine times per two week session (9 lessons). The TAAF Swim Team provides a recreational program that introduces participants to competitive swimming. Swim meets are held against other teams — Bryan, Brenham, Huntsville, Navasota, Livingston, etc. — with the summer.. culminating with the State TAAF Swim Meet. Participants practice four times per week in April and May, with practice sessions increasing to five times per week in June and July. The following table presents. the, costs, revenues, and percentage of cost recovery for aquatics programs: Aquatics Activities Cost/Revenue Analysis Percentage Activity Cost Revenue Difference Cost Recovery Open Swim $ 567,153 $257,054 $ 310,099 45.32% Swim Lessons $ 366,394 $ 74,762 $ 291,632 20.40% TAAF Swim Team $ 106,046 $ 17,065 $ 88,981 16.09% Total $1,039,593 S348,881 S 690,712 33.56% Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department (0 DMG-M4M US, INC. 2001 Page 11 Cost Revenue Units per Unit per Unit 114,319 $--- 4.96 $ 2.25 2,623 $ 139.69 $ 28.50 201 $ 527.59 $ 84.90 Aquatics utilizes the "minimal fee support" requirement as set forth in the fiscal budget, and therefore requires only a 0% to 50% cost recovery. For Open Swim, DMG- MAXIMUS has established a 50% recovery rate, as well as a 20% recovery rate for Swim Lessons, and a 20% recovery rate for TAAF Swim Team. The table below outlines the potential additional revenue for Aquatics Programs: Activity Open Swim Swim Lessons TAAF Swim Team Aquatics Potential Revenue Increases Total Potential Current Cost Potential Potential Additional Cost Revenue Units per Unit Pee Revenue Revenue $ 567,153 $ 257,054 114,319 $ 4.96 $ 2.50 $ 285,798 $ 28,744 $ 366,394 $ 74,762 2,623 $ 139.69 $ 30.00 $ 78,690 $ 3,928 $ 106,046 $ 17,065 201 $ 527.59 $ 100.00 $ 20,100 $ 3,035 S 1,039,593 S 348,881 $ 384,588 S 35,707 As some pools currently charge different fees than others, DMGm S felt it would be appropriate to increase pool charges across the board approximately 25%. The following table indicates the proposed fees for each pool: Pool Rate Increase Increased Pool Current Fee % Increase Pee Hallaran/Thomas $ 2.00 25% $ 2.50 Natatorium $ 2.00 25% $ 2.50 Adamson $ 3.50 25% $ 4.50 I) Rentals Pavilion Rentals provide attractive, well -maintained outdoor covered facilities for the use of _local residents and businesses for private gatherings (company parties, birthday parties, wedding receptions, family reunions, etc.). Pavilions range in size, accommodating anywhere from 30 to 300 people. All offer picnic tables and barbecue pits. Some also include rest rooms, full-size kitchens, exclusive use of playground equipment, volleyball courts, and horseshoe pits. Ball field rentals allow citizens to access softball fields for practice and tournaments. The individual or individuals in charge of a tournament must meet with representatives of Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department C D IG MMafVS. INC. 2001 Page 12 the Athletic and Park Operations staff before the tournament to arrange any tournament and maintenance details. Pool rentals provide children with a positive, aquatic birthday experience and parents with an alternative site for birthday parties. Parties are two hours in length and the staff blocks the area, decorates, sets up the party, serves food, and cleans up. The following table provides costs, revenues, and percentage of cost recovery for rentals: Activity Cost Pavilion Rentals $ 39,887 Hallaran Rental $ 11,989 Thomas/Natatorium Rental $ 13,872 Adamson Rental $ 34,202 Ball Field Rental $ 148,768 Rentals Cost/Revenue Analysis Revenue Difference $ 17,043 $ 22,844 $ 3,150 $ 8,839 $ 2,555 $ 11,317 $ 25,738 $ 8,464 $ 2,235 $ 146,533 Total $ 248,718 $ 50,721 $ 197,997 Percent of Cost Revenue Cost Recovery Units per Unit per Unit 42.73% 355 $ 112.36 $ 48.01 26.27% 24 $ 499.54 $ 131.25 18.42% 28 $ 495.43 $ 91.25 75.25% 71 $ 481.72 $ 362.51 1.50% 35 $ 4,250.51 $ 63.86 20.39 % According to the Financial Policies, rentals are required to yield 0 to 50% cost recovery. The following table indicates the potential cost recovery for rentals, as identified by DMG-MAXEAUS, at a 50% cost recovery: Rentals Potential Revenue Increases Total Potential Current Cost Potential Potential Additional Activity cost Revenue Units per unit Fee Revenue Revenue Pavilion Rentals $ 39,887 $ 17,043 355 $ 112.36 $ 55.00 $ 19,525 $ . 2,482 Thomas Rental $ 13,872 $ 2.555 24 $ 578.00 $ 290.00 $ 6,960 $ 4,405 Hallaran/Natatorium-Rental' $.' 11,989 $ 31150 28 $ 428.18 $ 215.00 $ 6,020 $ 2,870 Adamson Rental $ 34,202 $ 25,738 71 $ 481.72 $ 365.00 $ 25,915 $ 177 Ball.FieldRental $ 148,768 $ 2,235 35 $ 4,250.51 $ 2,125.00 $ 74,375 $ 72,140 Total $ 248,718 $ 50,721 $ 1J2,795 $ 82,074 E' a Recreation Centers The College Station Conference Center is a facility that is available to a broad spectrum of groups with no one group or type being allowed to dominate the Center. Preference is Cost oJServices Studyfor the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department cC D.bfG-11LAXLLNS, INC. 2001 Page 13 shown for groups who do not operate on a permanent basis, and would not, therefore, tend to have a facility of their own in which to operate. The Conference Center has public meeting rooms, a kitchen, deck, patios, audio/visual equipment and other amenities. The Teen Center provides the youth of College Station a place of their own. It provides educational and recreational opportunities to the youth of College Station. The facility consists of two rooms with internet-capable computers, game room, dance floor, sound and fight system and a snack bar. The Lincoln Center provides many services to the citizens of College Station, including acting as a hub for the Boys and Girls Club, as well as hosting various activities for seniors. The Lincoln Center houses a computer center, and a full size basketball court and provides many educational and recreational opportunities. The following table provides costs, revenues, and percentage of cost recovery for the. recreation centers: Recreation Centers Cost/Revenue Analysis Percent of Activity Cost Revenue Difference Cost Recovery Lincoln Center $ 293,620 $ 13,649 $ 279,971 4.65% Teen Center $ 258,198 $ 10,424 $ 247,774 4.04% Conference Center $ 318,153 $ 124,072 $ 194,081 39.00% Total S 869,971 $ 148,145 $ 721,826 17.03% Although potential revenue increases are not identified for the Recreation Centers, it would be beneficial for the Parks and Recfeaition Department to identify whether or not an increase in costs for theConference Center should be addressed. The Conference Center is utilized, for the most pan, by adults, and therefore would be subject to the policies associate'd"iYith Adult -Activities. If a 50% collection rate were utilized, the City would stand to gain. approximately $35,000 annually in revenue. It is the opinion of DMG-MAXWUS, INC., that. an -increase in fees at the Teen and Lincoln Centers would possible decrease attendance, and would not be a significant benefit to the City. F. Other Activities The City of College Station operates the Wolf Pen Creek Amphitheater, which hosts a variety of entertainment events throughout the season targeted to all ages and interests. The full cost of maintaining this facility can be found in the table below. Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department C DMG-AdAXUf0, INC. 2001 Page 14 The City of College Station operates and enterprise fund for the Parks and Recreation Extra Education Program. All enterprise funds are required to collect between 80 and 100% of all costs according to the city's financial policies. Currently, the Extra Education program recovers only approximately 91.24%, and is therefore meeting the policy as written in the budget document. This is illustrated in the table below. The Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for the maintenance of the City of College Station Cemetery. Plots are purchased through the City Secretary's Office. The table below illustrates the full cost of maintaining the cemetery: -Although the City may consider the implementation of a perpetual care fund, this would fall beyond the scope of this study. DMG-NfAMWS has identified the costs of operating and maintaining the Cemetery in the table below. The Parks and Recreation Department allows other organizations to utilize the facilities at no cost to participants. These leagues include Soccer, Girl's Fast Pitch Softball, Tournaments, and Little League. These activities require substantial maintenance costs, which are currently not being recovered by the City. The table below identifies these costs: Other Activities Ue tutgjxsis Percent of Activity Cost Revenue Difference Cost Recovery Wolf Pen Creek Amphitheater $ 16,716 $ 4,179 $ 12,537 25.00% Extra Education $ 67,732 $ 61,800 $ 5,932 91.24% Cemetary $ 163,773 $ - $ 163,773 0.00% Soccer $ 137,025 $ - $ 137,025 0.00% Little League $ 183,858,., $ - $ 183,858 0.00% Tournaments $ 110,678 $ - $ 110,678 0.00% Total $ 679,782 $ 65,979 $ 613,803 9.71% Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department C DMG-MAMUS, INC. 2001 Page 15 There are several benefits that the City will derive from the cost allocation plans that adequately and consistently document administrative indirect costs. Benefits include documenting the maximum allowable administrative transfers to the General Fund, allowing for the recovery of indirect costs from State and Federal grants and contracts, a more comprehensive and consistent cost accounting capability -in determining the full cost of City services and the cost plan can form the basis of cost/benefit analysis particularly for administrative services. 1 111' 1111111111111 1111111,111111111111111111117 The User Fee Study will provide the City with several benefits including a knowledge of current activity costs which will provide a bench mark for the future, increased revenue from existing fee areas, revenue from new fee areas and staff utilization information. The study can be used as a basis for prioritizing resource utilization. The basic theories behind user fees are that any service provided for a specific individual or group should not be paid from general taxes, that services provided to non-residents should not be paid from general taxes, and that beneficiaries of a service should pay for the service. Keeping these theories in mind, setting fees is essentially equivalent to establishing prices for services. In the private sector, prices 'are usually set in a manner that is expected to maximize profits. Since making a profit is not an objective of the City in providing services, it is commonly felt that fees should be established at a level that will recover the cost of providing each service. However, there are circumstances in which it might be regarded as a. reasonable policy to set fees at a level that does not reflect the full cost of providing the service. Cost does not necessarily equal price. Therefore, it-i's, irip.brtant to discuss some of the ramifications of these non -cost factors so that the role.ofthe cost figures.may be placed in proper perspective. The price charged for a service affects the quantity demanded by potential --users, in many instances, raising the price of a service results in fewer units of service being demanded. And, the volume of that service produced affects the unit cost of a service. Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department C DMG-AdAMIUS, INC. 2001 Page 16 This poses a special problem for the City when attempting to set fees on a basis that will recover the full cost of providing the services. As noted above, the unit cost of a service may rise or fall depending on the volume produced, and that volume may depend on the volume demanded, which, in turn, may depend on the fee charged. Fees charged for recreational services provide a good example of this concept. Quite reasonably, children, senior citizens and others with limited means may discontinue using a recreational facility if fees are raised significantly. They may regard the services as desirable, but not essential, and find other means of recreation. The resulting decrease in volume would then increase the unit cost; a situation that would require additional fee increases. Some services' fees, however, probably will not be responsive to volume demand because the services will be used regardless of the fees charged. AlthoughUser fees are often established on a principle that requires those who use the service to bear the cost of producing it. thereenterprise system, .. Accordingly,be preferable to set feessome below full cost. Consequently, the ramifications of a subsidization policy should be fully understood. Subsidies are provided for two basic purposes. The first is to permit an identified group (e.g., senior citizens, students, public assistance recipients) to participate in services that they might not otherwise be able to afford. This is a legitimate function of government, assuring all citizens' access to important services without regard to their ability to pay. While such subsidies could be granted on the basis of a means test (not all senior citizens are economically deprived), ease of administration and concem for dignity often suggest offering particular subsidies to broad groups that may include many who are able to afford the full cost of the service. Such .subsidies . may be achieved either through rate structures (i.e., charging lower fees to certain groups for common service) or through reducing fees for services most likely to be utilized by particular groups. a. The second--purpb'se of subsidies is to provide services that may benefit those not qualifying as immediate recipients. For example, code enforcement inspections ensure compliance with City zoning 'ordinances. Ordinances are designated to safeguard communities from deteriorating properties, which ultimately impact the homeowner by lowering property values and causing possible health and safety problems. In this case and similar cases, it may be regarded as appropriate to spread the cost of services over the large base of potential beneficiaries. Economic Incentives Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department cC DMG MAXIMUS, INC. 2001 " ' Page 17 It may be desirable to use fees as a means of encouraging certain activities or patterns of use. For example, setting a relatively high fee for scarce resources such as water may encourage conservation. Inexpensive products or services, on the other hand, often encourage waste. There are several ways to modify patterns of use. It may be desirable to shift the time of day or season in which services are in greater demand. If spreading out a peak load, for example, results in reducing the need for more capacity, perhaps savings could be achieved that would justify a lower rate. Changing fee structures,' through offering lower rates during off-peak hours or seasons, may also change usage patterns. Although the City may monopolize certain services within its boundaries, there are many instances of competitive pressure, which contain the ability to raise fees. There may be in the private sector alternatives to using City services. For example, instead of attending a recreation program at a park, citizens may go to a movie or watch television. When there are alternatives available, the City may decide the private sector or another governmental entity can provide cheaper and more effective'service, thereby eliminating its role in a particular service area- In this manner, competition may inhibit full recovery of costs, but at the same time, it also gives the City the option of reducing non-esse• services and reducing City costs. The most straightforward alternative includes those services where it is appropriate to recover costs or generate revenues in excess of costs. Typically these services have traditionally and historicallyt, recovered fU cost and there is a consensus that these services should be entirely user fee supported. Pnicing Palley' at As-, the City determines user fee policy for each department and each individual fee area, it may be helpful to conside't the following decision matrix. Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department 0 DiUG-AMMIMS, INC. 2001 Page 18 MEMEM ------- -------------- ------------ --- ------------- -- --- - - .... . --- ------ -- - This Executive Summary presents a high level overview' of our costing approach. Detailed indirect cost allocation plans and user fee studies have been provided to the City as separate documents. DMG-MAXDAUS, INC. appreciates this opportunity to be service to the City of College Station, Texas in the identification of the Parks and Recreation Department's costs of services in order to update user fee charges. We welcome the opportunity to provide any clarification or additional information on our findings that the City may require. Cost of Services Study for the City of College Station Parks and Recreation Department C) DMG-AdAXLVf US. INC. 2001 Page 19 k T OF COLLEGE ST ONI U , I C 0 UN[:,,'may C�F CER E D'e�S COP >��i''�': E "v"'Ra I'VIR"a th"L rxulinuicas Monday, June 11, 2001 .,i des Recreation Center 1.000 Eleanor street S,4` P a 7�� vr� l > 4 �.r r� _ r r6 6 r° Inc-perso `u it �7uo.l �' � Vr FG � � � , C ",a�. y t iNe M "L4r vv e cad e s to order f `Lk ' Ca u( �u a ._, 1J e u� e�$��� at �.1, r �P<arde' — on cr e e rr @ c if G � f r err ray" r'r2 may a: r:l F4 y �. � a O��rS4�6 �-��� ����a � L��..�i��� U'.a:�� �:3�>(>t��-��•>> elf :r£�� �� � � d �§�� fa �,.a�.ti��� G=� PAbs,en was recrei"a, ed from De-x,bd v) _G no' m as. PD r"qpsjvaI'aa 8f6T Puieesfrom Regular k71nay 14, 2001 Lifioohn eca"n1estkon ��UUCrnr on--�liK s meet hig- Ia rl`Ve May 14, 001 Ikeguiar Meaa'trig � ino Aas vvei e appr ouwead as read,. U01 t e' o n , S, i i y ssio rc � {,�`ir s3 �v C er =,a{h' f � Rees1?o �Pv�-`11ail' `Gun •?or �� � � ��:: ��6r-,7'cl� � 'Ed� a �s5e��� �§.de�`w's�'v�L�t"U��d� � �i � ( 4 Hy; � i{i Bryan/college _,ta19on Little D°bboB ers UrlsrAll Star rogram- 3aamso`inforr1ethe a qum t or $1 2100 l has V{ii")ode and approv, by TreasureTreasurew Clletn" ` �u dBz11�n �so d c'lgpiaidt, 'DiscuJ7don on Ccgn-G`nuni'ny ileac `ion a.bm S'1111 :ux�' ("'WubxFU1sl�n' protnldeed rinpul- ";,rid +. ry / t. �„ 5r. n N r rtnl t;�,"�1 r r� 5 yr, k a r r, 4 Sn a oa ra iinn C-.1 aa>I fj iY�U ��� ��.��� II rL'�ir �LfljeJr �{�oi'I�i,U'�i rliJt��; eL�t �.��'ia.?a i. `:Jit t��L� ���6r� i. t',TVrilA BC@r��l�n`� �t�ti-�.1���,��11¢u. 7Vae.iod i(s) , - TJ G�sur d- C�e i1rn,on tl epo rrbL; lR e \avj rre-, dA ba 5Cf nce &0 Fl�,he `v0m rn1rube,a. „olesoauut Outreach Sbfjbr`oVnrrfleue- in T,domaq ab encee C. ViAlflanns provided infbrmaldoia on this �rud'cu "kP1 bfic. lation 9a yt� aft iV � .� Spa out Progns of Newslette Es Wififlranns `"o i e tinformation on t sub topic and asked for all iterras to be sw9bmIUCed no () Discussion on Fall TAAS Busts ! ably- Clem;vons advised 6he conwRte mist plans for the `� �aAS Wster were an Itawa � �r the ucnairrned date of September 8, 2001 rr Discussig`�.�'&ily���r ��x-�pS ,v.���i�`�°�`p��' ru�fln< ��ion��ae��.r�V;�ns co�:'�& ad•,,� avalila hmare the UK - a resUUW the veloa°a tion al other offices and r ICt space acquisitions. C:VfffR,,T 0'%TS!X EPw4 ang,2fi01ntgtrtioates.doc -Senlors Subcomimfthee- Robinson Informed the C--mmitVe that the next scheduled event for the Seniors v-would be- a 7,Pralse Hour' scheduled for June 13, 2001 from 10.00-11:00. - LRC Stu( vrvis.aW's; Rtepowz- gLance JadksofnE (a) Discujssloin, of LRC Surnumer �Pra)grwmi Previevv- Jackson Informed irv�e rommittea o) f? the gravd, h ar,,,d increase in numnbers at, e LRC aind the pnmvmed surgivne, activities. o 3juneteemith Jackcsono presenbed a V11yer dne L-PRC June,teenth, activEder,% (c.) Repon,"t, 'Discussion wad 1,-P�asslWe Considdematon cai� ��evjlsed Renmnbai pAid',kes for the iLRFC- I Is Kern vvas table ipiending the urevlmn.A.s of mavp rims by all U Cbommi'Ums-e rnemivem it aft Feedback frawn Jacksoon Fve UIRCC Yowden, fikthhlet`pxs CCOundi cmfUme- n evathsxdSubo-nrnlJacksothgrep thtdimateir vvaul be d'Escussed at the Augus't LRC Cornimnittme Mee"Ung. Ruillitre hAgev),da Iftemm, 9. The mhead,,,mg dva's adqjjoiurned at 6,45 pxrn, Miext iU C nm(;!Ung schedualed, frow 'Mionday, August 13, 2001 C.AWWDOWSWEPAI AaugM I Fxftmm brufts. doo ORDINANCE NO. 2368 AN ORDINANCE REPLACING "CHAPTER 9 SUBDIVISIONS, SECTION 10, R-EQUIREMENTS FOR PARK LAND DEDICATION" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, WITH THAT SET OUT BELOW IN EXHIBIT "A"; PROVIDING A SEVERABIL- iTY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING A PENALTY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That "Chapter 9 Subdivisions, Section 10, Requirements for Park Land Dedication", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be replaced with that set out in Exhibit "A`°, attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That if any provisions of any section of this ordinance shall be held to be void or uncon- stitutional, such holding shall in no way effect the validity of the remaining provisions or sections of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. PART 3: That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shalt be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25a00) nor more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense, Said Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective six (6) months after its publication in the newspaper, as provided by Section 35 of the Charter of the City of College Station. .o 1 t CONE HOOKS, City Secretary HARVEY C L, City LYN14"McU-HANEY, Mayor jrlc_ I windowrl win wordlordinanl parktand.doc 1/1SN9 ORDINANCE NO. 2368 Page 2 EXHIBIT "A" That "Chapter 9, Subdivisions, Section 1.0, Requirements for Park Land Dedication" is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: "SECTION 10: REQUIREMENTS FOR PARK LAND DEDICATION 10-A. P airpose 10-A- I This section is adopted to provide recreational areas in the form of neighborhood parks as a function of subdivision and site development in the City of College Station- This section is enacted in accordance with the home rule powers of the City of College Station, granted under the Texas Constitution, and the statutes of the State of Texas, including, but not byway of limitation, Texas Local Gov't Code Chapter 212 (Vernon 1988; Vernon Supp. 1999). It is hereby declared by the City Council that recreational areas in the form of neighborhood parks are necessary and in the public welfare, and that the only adequate procedure to provide for same is by integrating such a require- ment into the procedure for planning and developing property or subdivisions in the city, whether such development consists of new construction on vacant land or rebuild- ing and remodeling of structures on existing residential property. 10-A-2 Neighborhood parks are those parks providing for a variety of outdoor recreational opportunities and located within convenient distances from a majority of the residences to be served thereby. The park zones established by the Parks and Recreation Depart- ment and shown on the official Parks and Recreation map for the City of College Station shall be prima facie proof that any park located therein is within such a convenient distance from any residence located therein. The primary cost of neighborhood parks should be borne by the ultimate residential property owners who, by reason of the proximity of their property to such parks, shall be the primary beneficiaries of such facilities. Therefore, the following requirements are adopted to effect the purposes stated above and shall apply to any land to be used for residential purposes: to-B General Requirement Dedications shall cover both land and development costs for neighborhood parkland for all types of residential development Whenever a final plat is filed of record with the County Clerk of Brazos County for development of a residential area in accordance with the planning and zoning regula- tions of the City, such plat shall contain a clear fee simple dedication of an area of land to the City for park purposes. For single family developments this area shall be equal to one (1) acre for each one hundred and one (101) proposbd dwelling units. For duplex and other multi -family development this area shall be equal to one (1) acre for each one hundred and thirty-four (134) proposed dwelling units. For methodology refer to Appendix I attached herein and incorporated and made a'part of this ordinance for all purposes. Any proposed plat submitted to the City for approval shall show the area proposed to be dedicated under this section- The required land dedication of this subsection may be met by a payment of money in lieu of land when permitted or required by the ocher provi- sions of this section. In the event a plat is not required this dedication shall be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. istc.-twadowst wirtwordlordinan 1parktattd doc 11151W ORDINANCE NO. 2368 10-B.2 Fee in Lieu of Land Page 3 A land owner responsible for dedication under this section may elect to meet the requirements of 10-B. I. in whole or in part by a cash payment in lieu of [and, in the amount set forth below. Before making this election, the land owner must obtain approval for the cash payment in lieu of land from the Planning & Zoning Commission pursuant to the plat approval procedures set out in Chapter 9, Section 6. Such payment in lieu of land shall be made at or prior to the time of filing the final plat for record at the Courthouse or prior to the issuance of a building permit where a plat is not required. The fee in lieu of land dedication requirement shall be met by a payment of a fee set from time to time by resolution by the City Council, sufficient to acquire neighborhood parkland. Unless changed by the City Council, such per -acre price shall be computed on the basis of one hundred and forty-eight dollars (S148.00) per dwelling unit for single family development and one hundred and twelve dollars ($112.00) per dwelling unit for duplex and multi -family development. Refer to Appendix 1. Cash payments may be used only for acquisition or development of a neighborhood park located within the same zone as the development. 10-13.3 Park Development Fee In addition to the land dedication, there shall also be a fee set from time to time by resolution of the City Council sufficient to provide for development of the land to meet the standards for a neighborhood park to serve the zone in which such development is located. Unless changed by City Council this per -acre fee shall be computed on the basis of three hundred and nine dollars (S309.00) per dwelling unit for single family developments and two hundred and thirty-three dollars (S233) for duplex and multi- family developments. Refer to Appendix 1. 10-BA Park Development in Lieu of Fee A developer has the option to construct the neighborhood park improvements in lieu of the park development fee. Development plans and specifications shall be reviewed, and approved by the Parks Board. All improvements shall either be financially guaranteed or accepted by the City prior to the filing of a plat in the case of platted developments or prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy in the event that platting is not required-` The process of financial guarantee shall be the same as that found in section 7 of the - Subdivision Regulations and shall be used whether a plat is required or not. Once' improvements are accepted by the City the developer shall deed the property an(f' improvements to the City. 10-B.5 In instances where an area of less than five (5) acres is required to be dedicated, the City shall have the right to accept the dedication for approval on the final plat, or to refuse same, after consideration of the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion and the Parks and Recreation Board. The City shall have the right to require payment of cash in lieu of land in the amount provided above, if it determines that sufficient park area is already in the public domain in thd area of the proposed develop- ment, or if the recreation potential for that zone would be better served by expanding or improving existing parks. 10-13.6 The dedication required by this section shall be made by filing of the final plat or contemporaneously by separate instrument unless additional dedication is required subsequent to the filing of the final plat. If the actual number of completed dwelling units exceeds the figure upon which the original dedication was based, such additional dedication shall be required, and shall be made by payment of the cash in lieu of land amount provided above, or by the conveyance of an entire numbered lot to the City. 10-B.7 The City may from time to time decide to purchase land for parks in or near the area of actual or potential development. If the City does purchase park land in a park zone, the City shall have the right to require subsequent park land dedications for that zone to be in cash only. This will be to reimburse the City its purchase cost. Once the City has fst,-A%vindo wstwin wordlordinaniparktand.doc 1115199 ORDINANCE NO. 2368 Page 4 been reimbursed entirely for all such park land within a park zone, this subsection shall cease to apply, and the other subsections of this section shall again be applicable. 10-C Prior Dedication: Absence of Prior Dedication 10-C. I Credit shall be. given for land and/or money dedicated pursuant to Ordinance 690 or 983. 10-C.2 If a dedication requirement arm prior to passage of this section, that dedication requirement shall be controlled by the ordinance in effect at the time such obligation arose, except that additional dedication shall be required if the actual density of struc- tures constructed upon property is greater than the former assumed density. Additional dedication shall be required only. for the increase in density and shall be based upon the ratio set forth in 10-B. of this section. 10-C.3 At the discretion of the City, any former gift of [arid to the City may be credited on a per acre basis toward eventual land dedication requirements imposed on the donor of such lands. ne City Council shall consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Board in exercising its discretion under this subsection. 10-D Svccial Fund: Right to Refund 10-D. I There is hereby established a special fund for the deposit of all. sums paid in lieu of land dedication under this section or any preceding ordinance, which fund shall be known as the park land dedication fund- 10-D.2 The City shall account for all sums paid' in lieu of land dedication under this section with reference to the individual plats involved. Any funds paid for such purposes must be expended by the City within five (5) years from the date received by the City for acquisition and/or development of a neighborhood park as defined herein- Such funds shall be considered to be spent on a first in, first out basis. If not so expended, the owners of the property on the last day of such period shall be entitled to a prorates refund of such sum, computed on a square footage of area basis. ne owners of such prbperty must request such refund within one (1) year of entitlement, in writing, or such right shall be barmd. 10-E Comnreliensive Plan Considerations 10-E. I The Park and Open Space Plan is intended to provide the College Station Parks and Recreation Advisory Board with'a guide upon which to base future decisions. Bemuse of the need to consider specific characteristics in the site selection process, the park locations indicated on the Plan are general- The actual locations, sizes, and number of parks will be determined when development occurs. The Plan will also be used to locate desirable park sites before development occurs, and those sites may be purchased by the City or received as donations. 10-E.2 Park Zones are established by the City*s Comprehensive Plan and are configured to indicate service areas for neighborhood parks. Zone boundaries are established that follow key topographic features such as major thoroughfares, streams, and city limit titles, 10-F Additional Requirements: Definitions 10-F.1 Any land dedicated to the city under this section must be suitable for park and recreation uses. Consideration will be given to land that is in the floodplain or may be considered "floodab[6" even though not in a federally regulated floodplain-as long as, due to its elevation, it is suitable for park improvements. W! Neighborhood park sites should be adjacent to residential areas in a manner that serves the greatest number of users, jA-. tuindowst*,,Cnwordlordinatilparkland.doc 1115199 ORDINANCE NO. 2368 Page 5 (b) Neighborhood park sites should be located so that users are not required to cross arterial roadways to access them. (c) Sites should not be severely sloping or have unusual topography which would render the land unusable for organized recreational activities. (d) Sites should have existing trees or other scenic elements. 10-F.2 Parks should be easy to access and open to public view so as to benefit area develop- ment, enhance the visual character of the city, protect public safety and minimize conflict with adjacent land uses. lle'following guidelines should be used in designing parks and adjacent development_ (a)Where physically feasible, park sites should be located adjacent to schools in order to encourage both shared facilities and the potential co -development of new sites. (b) A proposed subdivision adjacent to a park may not be designed to restrict reasonable access to the park from other area subdivisions. Street connections to existing or future adjoining subdivisions may be required to provide reason- able access to parks. (c) Where a non-residential use must directly abut a park, the use must be separated by a screening wall or fence and landscaping. Access points to the park may be allowed by the Planning and Zoning Commission if public benefit is established- (d) It is desirable that a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the perimeter of a park should abut a public street. In all cases, the City shaft approve the proposed street alignment fronting on city parks. (e) Streets abutting a park shall be built in accordance with the thoroughfare, plan and the standards of this ordinance, however, the City may require any residential street built adjacent to a park to be constructed to collector width to ensure acoess and prevent traffic congestion- Developer may request oversize participation in such instance. 10-G. Consideration and Approval Unless provided otherwise herein, an action by the City shall be by the City Council, after consideration of the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commi ioa and the Parks and Recreation Board. Any proposal considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission under this section shall have been reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board and its recommendation given to the Commission. no Commission may make a decision contrary to such recom- mendations only by a concurring vote of at least five (5) membe$s. Should the Commission be unable to get this vote, the matter shall then be referred to the City Council for its decision- 10-EL Review of Dedication Reauirements The City shall review the fees set forth in this section every three (3) years. The City shall take into account inflation as it affects land and park development costs as well as the City's targeted level of service for parkland per one thousand population. I= shall be set by resolution of the City council. isV--.-twindowslwinuvrdkordirt,inlparklandd,oc 1115199 ORDWANCE NO. 2368 APPE, NDfX I PARK LAND DEDICATION FEE -METHODOLOGY I. Current Level of Service 7 Acres Neighborhood & Community Park Land per 1,000 Population 3.5 Acres per 1,000 (Neighborhood Parks) 3.5 Acres per 1,000 (Community Parks) IL Land Requirements Neighborhood Parks 3.5 Acres/1,000 I Acre per 285 people Page 6 2.81 Persons per Household (PPH) for Single Family and 2.13 Persons per Household for Multi - Family based on census information for owner and renter occupied units. The overall average from the Census is 2.31 persons per household (dwelling unit). SINGLE FAMILY 295 people 12.81 PPH = 101 DUs I Acre per 101 DUs 285 people/ 2.13 PPH= 134 DUs I Acre per 134 DUs UL Neighborhood Park Acquisition Costs (Determines Fee in Ue.0 of Land) (Assumption) !,acre costs SIS, 000 to purchase SINGLE F"IL Y $15,000 1101 DUs = S 148 per DU MULTY-FAMILY $15,WO 1134 DUs = $112 per DU IV. Neighborhood Park Development Costs (Determines Fec for Dcyclopment) Average Neighborhood P ark in College Station — 8 Acres Development Cost for Neighborhood Park — $250,000" Cost Per Acre for Development —S31,250 SINGLE F"IL Y $31,250 1101 DUs = S309 per DU V. Total Dedication Fee SINGLE FAMILY S148 + S309 = S457 doc 1115199 MOL TI-F"IL Y $31,250 1134 DUs = $233 per DU MULTI E4M(LY $112 + $233 = S345 .~~~y of College Station Parks and Recreation Board Current List of Subcommittees: Fees .......................................... Glen Davis, BfDDavis, John Veterans Park & Athletic Complex ,.,,.__.,Glen Davis, John Nichols, -............^....-......-........,...~...^.-.~..^.^.~"^n..~^~p~~^ Joint Ventures with CSISD .......................... Chris Barzilla, Glen Davis Tn�� `��� ln�n ' .~~~^ ~°^"�^�" ``^"^ ^^~'^~^^'^^^'`^'^^''~^~~^`'~—~'-, George Dresser Community Attractions Committee Brazos Animal Shelter ...................................... .................................... � 3 BASE Plan —.--^^^''--~'''^~-^-`~'—^—^''~--'-'—''^---'`^'—'~2 BarkPark. .................. .^................................................................. ..,�3 Budget........... .—,.-..-.^-.^^~'`~~''--~-~'—^'^~`~^^^^—....... ... .... ^''4 Features of the Bark Park E^ 0����.-..—........---^^^'^—''^� . . t0Give— ......... ___ ..... .............. ........... ~.,_...... ,,6 Board of Directors/Animal Shelter Advisory Committee .............. ... 7 <_ Animal Shelter �RUKANE SOCIETV/SPCA jiqiulilAqi "Improving the quality of life for the people and animals of the Brazos Valley. " - Mission Statement, BAS CIS/SPCA - The Brazos Animal Shelter Humane Society/ SPCA is celebrating 20 years of service to the community through a wide variety of animal and human PR services: pq ® The Adoption/Lost and Found Services place over 3500 lost or orphaned cats and dogs a year. ® Educational programs at local schools and at the shelter provide hands-on experience with animals for children from 5 to 14 years of age, teaching them to respect all living things. ® Teaching programs for all levels of veterinary students providing hands-on animal care and spay/neuter programs, in partnership with the Texas A & M University School of Veterinary Medicine. ® Pets for Seniors provides free veterinary and grooming assistance, as well as free adoptions for pet lovers over 55 years young. The future of the Brazos Animal Shelter includes an aggressive expansion plan. The vision of this plan is to provide community resources to nurture the human -companion animal bond and promote respect for all living things. X �1 L 01 I lJ D" D J C L D J n IVAS E Plan Our expansion plan has an acronym: BASE 3 Brazos Animal Shelter Expansion, Education, and Endowment. The 3 E's help us describe our efforts to: Expand with our comprehensive long range plan Educate to progressively solve pet problems, leading to responsible pet ownership Endow life-saving programs with solid private funding 89 acres have been purchased to be developed in phases. Seed funding has started our future endowment fund. Phase I New shelter with more space for education and adoptions Phase 11 Bark Park that is fenced for off -leash activities Phase III Farm Education Center Phase IV Pet Memorial Gardens and Trails Phase V Dog Obedience Training Pavilion Phase VI Nature Center and Wildlife Rehabilitation 2 a 0 :1 Ci &Ir Bark Park The Bark Park is Phase 11 of the Brazos Animal Shelter Expansion, Education, and Endowment Plan. The Bark Park will provide an area for off - leash activities. Bark Park Building Campaign The purpose of this campaign is to fund the construction of the Bark Park. The location and design of the park will provide a centralized location, while maintaining close proximity to the new adoption and education facilities. Benefits of a Bark Park ® Allows people to socialize and exercise with dogs in a safe environment ® Provides elderly and disabled owners with an accessible place to exercise their companion Promotes responsible pet ownership Enables dogs to legally run off -leash Promotes public health and safety Nurtures the companion animal bond Provides a chance to meet new people and pets everyday 3 711 Agility Training Equipment ( see page 5)...............................$2,120 Crushed Granite Trails, .5 miles, with metal edging, ................ $30,000 Concretetrails and inclines ....... ............................ ............. $4,200 6 ft chain linked fence for 10 acres.......................................$24,000 InterpretiveSigns ........ .............. o................... ................... $5,000 Mutt Mitt Dispensers and supplies-. 10 @ $150 each..'..— ..........$19500 Parking and drive (18,000 sq. ft. of stone) ..... o ...................o....$189®00 Park �tp� Lighting ....Fi©o.o.o.00.a.o.®........... o©©...o...o.00.o.o.............©..$25,0®0 Pond d Development... o ...................................... o ........ - o .....$697 80 SiteCleaning.. o......................................... o ................. o... $20,000 Supveying ............................. o .......... o ............. o .. o .... ......... $59000 Tool Shell (equipment storage). o o o ........................ o ...... o . o o ..—459500 Water Fountain (ADD approved, vandal iresistant) o ...... o ........ o —$2,000 WaterLines/meter ... ...... o .................... o ............................ $49800 TOTAL COSTS00000000..00000..00.00.0000.o.000000.00...... o..00000...—.415399®0 Total Funds raised to date.......................... o ........... 0 0 6 ... o.. e.$ 3,000 BALANCE �L1J1tl��ED.. Q......0.....o...o.................. o—... o..... 110,900 Gifts andpledges for the park have been received f om Bryan Parks and Recreation Land secured by contribution In honor of Say° Derek Barton, Nobel Laureate In chemistry and pet foster parent Tunnels $300 Hurdles and Boards $145 M Pause Tables $240 Jumps $340 &le dw &.114e &5' PM Ways to Give NNThere are a variety of ways for you to help the Brazos Animal Shelter Humane Society/SPCA to build this much -needed new Bark Park. in Direct Cash Gifts These contributions are of great importance because the money donated becomes immediately available to the Brazos Animal Shelter to cover the costs of the park construction. At this time, a donation of $50,000 gives the donor the opportunity to name the Bark Park. Pledges Gifts may be paid over a period of up to five years and in amounts and payment schedules convenient to the donor. Gifts of Securities Gifts of appreciated securities may be particularly advantageous to the donor as a tax -deduction. Gift of Real Property The gift of a home or parcel of real estate may prove advantageous to the donor as a tax -deduction. Life Income Gifts Planned gifts provide a number of options for the donor and can enable the donor to retain interest from the gift for themselves or their family members. Bequests For some donors, a gift through a will (bequest) is the most realistic method of making a major contribution to the Bark Park. Whatever method you choose, your gift will make a difference in the lives of thousands of people and pets in the Brazos Valley. For more information on any of these options, please call the Executive Director at 979-779-2687. Pot w 0 Board of Directors AR Jones Lynn McIlhaney J. Don Watson Shelter and Veterinary AdvR'SOry Committee 'Y I 'u- Dr. John August, DVM Kathy Bice, Executive Director BAS Bob BiRes, City ®f Bryan Dr. Lisa Howe, DVM Renee Lara, DV-M Craig Bond, DVM Ashley Wesp, Operations Supervisor Lt. Scott Simpson, CSPD N Phase I New S !ihelter with more space for education and adoptions Phase 11 Farm Education Center Phase IH Pet Park that is fenced for off leash activities Phase IV Pet Memotial Gardens and Trails Phase V Dog Obedience Training Pavilion Phase VI Nature Center and Wildlife ............. Rehabilitation I it I 11 I " , k g w ,., 'YwrW�, ""•rn „ .a.'"*du`4:,��.ntl '.r.' f"�'`y'•w" '±N""„m, . !'"°„,;.,«,,,i "..,r,.. P i 1„r ', '.a.. « �' ,�. �if a"`"`w,»«,rs,cw�.,.-�s`.,.�,s. w,,,'.."'•�' 7 .0 v , M t b c 0 ;' M MEAR+,.ad" ryy �¢ 71 , 'r "mNil, rlY A r,,,«,nr „ !. <Y, », 1n �'� ":,* a'• ,+t �' "�d ; it'tkW,, d R-' ;c;' G. \Ftui, ' q M, ., � ,:Yrs w ',.",' ^§, ~Y ,x k+flaa nn ` •if �G q, tv 1.""i'�kM"""'w"' �� p, x 4 el 1 1 sN „ " � R"�r« fit) � AN- a�,"uza: "' ., "MAM,$4".,�`, YsTw10, h,«� ,G:� .4' O% � r �' "'"'� i dt'a"g„ a""' ram,, y:'„♦,, *N4+. w«, 4"q+p "«+x i'„ f '4 ..r�...;. r «.a �?,a«.�"�'m,:, M ..,�.,,.. r pl,f. `. ,.• ! u i+" ^" ,,. � 'rs .a :;. 'w*,. .,, '; �.. �, �;'" !'Rt; w n""S. �1.,'S • „ ,'m N„ 'x.,., m <�. ., ,� �,r. ,y+ w�rp*,.+mu§,�+ .....,...« x'�'�' a: N, �.,«.. ":' «,. ,..,.�'r��`"... y .,��"N „°rw.+aV; � .. t ykAm �€'�a -"�'d, �y '�"�:fa�.k .�•u:. �'��. �;'��:".a'w„;�,&. rxs 'r' ~�,Wo- '*' :' �'" m ' ., :.'„ "�• 'm '«W '.wny',.p„w "rr'"' A �xw ,u d n „F'.uy . � � ��:"A. 9 �'i' g;�uK p�` 'rg �^ �y �` �q "n61; +; „ I �', ;' „6.» +n.r r• d+"m„ ,; ,3q''', """' k, 6t�"'k, ..i."�4 w', �.P",.s,' :, i ',.;; A'�i 6,,'�0 Y,;iS,'t I�,� "s '" . ,' a •u,. ,•„ a!a, N »rpua ,amre,••s a "xwe•.w w . . w +cam^ , ^^rnw *«, "w" ,',`-�u�m� ta: 'aai "" '+ 6pr"'� ':a4a`,' „rwld°"'` ' w,�-w�.�,n" ' n�', �'�,7''.�,�• a�Aad '�td , iti'ru su.a:«; ar.«'?"w.w•.Alw,p.«`:°'."..t:v,....=s..-wa,s.,.r*w,,t.,""«�llxx"".,'.".".:"v".at""."�.'w..e„w.°ta"i.,a«., «. « r :""�'4� 4n. � t, art' M p,(L y« .,'tp "" # AAd� � r IR ir ou �ppp� gq }}��'' hag �" yky1�,, an IVK ar 6. , 'ia?gi' 'X'. Gw . d aE �r ''Y".!.'�ui bi' A All, Y„ ., ':'' , J'�rnM4,r^�•�,r«rx.a.,s'�'ar.'r.aa. a � � ��t .���;xs `�6�1 � a ,«^ x...� n. sir ,M , VJ kc -, i.,ll p � lk%u. � IL9 `t ,l.., k�a:5" , �4, .. '.. IE ry�'�� u��� M1,�� �i � v r° , ',« .• , M,v'n"; i�, �, ,„�� ��� ,!t' I."C=.^:•^,qf,,,, .,¢I `�,,,' , ky ':,x , :F''i.� �'� ,p „ !'� - .`�, � as o,' „�, ,rm,� �'r '� ��.�, ^ Bark Park, Calabasas Page I of 3 C tTY of CM-AIRASAS a llbh.hLocal Weather A 9 we a Calabasas Bark 4232 Las Virgenes Rd. (South of the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District) 67211IF-110A U63MUIA U 01 Park Features: Separate Gated Children's Play Area Doggie Drinking Fountain Pooper Skoopers Ample Parking Bulletin Board Vaccine Clinic: The first Saturday of each month from 12:15 to 1: 15 FIRM! VIM Call: x 242 Calabasas Bark Park Rules: http://www.el.ca7labasas.ca.us/parks/barkpark.htrni 7/10/01 Bark Park, Calabasas Page 2 of 3 1. No dogs showing aggression towards other dogs or people can enter the park. 2. Owners must pick-up after their dogs. 3. No more than three (3) dogs per person in the park at one time. 4. Dogs must be properly inoculated, be healthy (no contagious conditions) and be parasite -tree. 5. No female dogs in heat allowed. 6. No toddlers or small children allowed in the dog run area. A fenced area for kids is provided. Children under 10 are strongly discouraged in the park without adult supervision. Children should not run with the dogs or chase them while in the park. 7. No puppies under 5 months. Puppies are not fully vaccinated, and are vulnerable to disease and injury. 8. No rawhide or food in the park as dog fights may result. 9. Please remove pinch (prong) collars and spike collars from dogs -before entering the park. Other dogs can be injured while playing. 10. No wolves or wolf hybrids allowed. 11. Owners must supervise their dogs closely, and cannot leave the park without their dog. 12. Please pay attention to the body language of other dogs to protect yourself and your dog. 133. If you feel that you or your dog is in danger, simply leave the park, report the situation, and come back another day. Questions or comments? 818-878-4242 x242 Calabasas Bark Park Liability Waiver: (Please read before entering the park) I agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Calabasas and its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all loss, liability, charges and expenses (including attorney's fees) and costs which may anise by reason of participation at the Calabasas Bark Park. The City does not provide accident, medical liability, workers' compensation insurance or any other insurance for participants or their dogs. I agree to carefully inspect and satisfy myself that the facilities provided are reasonably safe for their intended use. Once having http://www.ci.calabasas.ca.us/parks/barkpark.html 7/10/01 Bark Park, Calabasas Page 3 of 3 conducted the inspection, I agree to expressly assume the risk for myself and my dog(s) of participating at these premises. I understand the City retains the right to use photos taken during activities for publicity purposes. Handling Situations If you notice that someone hasn't picked up after their dog, don't be shy! Politely point and say "POOP ALERT" or some other friendly reminder. If a dog is threatening other dogs of people, Join together as a group to approach the owner. Politely ask the owner to remove the dog immediately. If he/she refuses, phone L.A. County Animal Control at 818-991-0071. If a dog attacks your dog, one way to separate them is to grab the hind legs of the offender and walk backwards. Do not attempt this maneuver if you feel the offender may cause you injury. Dog repellant spray is also available through the Friend of the Calabasas Bark Park. OIL I'VOWN&IM191impla-, Last Updated: 07/05/2001 http://www.ci.calabasas.ca.us/parks/barkpark.html 7/10/01 Page 1 of 2 € dqM (o lh Pans.mcp I...VeNde Permit --- --- -- - (elendar I h6 is PaA 1 Parly Options I People I seasonal AlIracflons I Aoaf ve Recr"Ilion Clarkston Goad, between Baldwin & Joslyn Roads For information call (2 ) 858-0906 Park Entry Fees Regular Fee $8/car/day Resident Discount $5/car/day Senior Citizen $2/car/day V Orion Oaks' NEW Bark Park offers seven Annuai Vehicle Permit fenced acres with water, wide-open spaces, woods and fields! Dogs must be properly licensed and Regular Fee $45 vaccinated and respond to voice commands. Pet Resident Discount $25 waste bags are provided at the park, compliments Senior Citizens $15 of Pet Supplies Plus. Water pump is available on site. Guests need an annual vehicle permit for entry. Park at the north Joslyn Road entrance and follow the signs (dogs must be leashed until they are inside the fenced area). Hooked on h nProg I a Preserves more than 927 acres of environmentally -sensitive green space Fishing on 90-acre Lake Sixteen; wheelchair - accessible fishing pier at Joslyn Road entrance http://www.co.oakland.mi.us/c—serv/Parks/on*onoks.htmi 7/10/01 Page 2 of 2 Ten miles of hiking trails, featuring a five -mile Achievement Trail. Mountain biking and cross- country skiing trails also available Award -winning wheelchair -accessible fishing dock and 120 foot boardwalk linking two trail systems v Parking lots on Clarkston, Baldwin and Joslyn roads. Annual or daily vehicle sticker required; can be purchased at Orion Twp. offices on Joslyn Road, south of the park (248-391-0304). http://www.co.oakland.ml.us/c—Serv/parks/orionoks.html 7/ i 0/01 OMM INITIMIT-Y, �U-1111*1 111 Zone ... is now open. Perhaps one of the largest "bark parks" in the nation, it features two 5 acre fenced areas (whose use will be alternated to allow wear recovery). The Park is located just north off of 56th street on High School Road (the road dead ends into the Pistol Range). It is a beautiful open area, with agility equipment for your dog, and benches for you. Season passes are available for $25 and daily passes are $3 on weekends and holidays, and $2 throughout the week. Vaccination records are required, and aggressive dogs are not allowed. A beautiful facifity that you and your canine companion are sure to enjoyi Rome I Calendar I Events I News I Fees I $WWS Boa-rd-Mern.bers I Books I Map - - ----- -- - - Books here for Information about the Park or here to send a Commit. Web services contributed by P1gq$ant__Vjew Par-wer-s .. ----------------- - http://www.eaglecreekpark-fdn.org/bark.htm 7/10/01 "Bark Park" may bring new freedoms to dog owners Page 1 of 3 "Bark ParK"may bring new freedoms to dog owners Melissa Rousseau News Editor Move over Hoffman, there's a new park in town, and it will give dog owners a freedom they have never had before. The first "Bark Park" in western Wisconsin was approved by the River Falls Park Board by a 4-3 vote at its Sept. 18 meeting. The "Bark Park" would give a•• owners a place to frolic with their pets withoutbreaking • 1 - ,- • ••'• fI - •-- •• • • • - According to Jan Linehan at City Hall, the proposal should be discussed at the Nov. 5 meeting of the Plan Commisson and would then be discussed at either the Nov. 12 or 26 meeting of the city council. "I'm sure there will be concerns over liability and questions about who will monitor the park during the time frame for open hours and costs," Beebe said. "I think the town board is nervous over liability," she said. 'But I don't see a big difference between going to a park with your kids and going to a park with your dog." If approved by the city council, the off -leash dog park will be located to the east of Hoffman Park. A five -to six-foot high chain -link fence will surround the 2 1/2 acre park. The area will also include an exercise area in the center, two sand and gravel relief areas for the dogs and several benches. Dog owners will be responsible for policing their own dogs while visiting the park. Kusilek said that there will be plasitc bags and designated areas for cleaning up after the animals. She believes that a group mentality will keep the park clean. "If one person does it, everyone will do it," she said. "But we'd like to have a volunteer staff onsight to oversee the park." http://www. uwrf.edu/student-voice/issues/1996/ 1996oct3/970409.htmi 7/10/01 "Bark Park" may bring new freedoms to dog owners Page 2 of 3 Kusilek visited several off -leash dog parks in Seattle before proposing the idea to the Park Board. "I visited the parks for about an hour, hour -and -a -half, and I didn't see one person who couldn't handle any situation," Kusilek said. "It was incredibly #rderly and smooth." "We'd like to have our own insurance in case a disaster took the fence out, or if we wanted to fence off a smaller area of the park for puppies, geriatric dogs or for people who would like a smaller area to work their dogs," she said. Kusilek added that she didn't know if $18,000 included the labor to put up the fence, and she said that she will continue to look for cheaper fencing. However, the committee may have to ask for volunteers to help put up the fence. To help raise funds for the park, Kusilek has asked Michael Padgett, art professor at UW-River Falls, to ask his students to donate their works of art for a fundraiser to be held sometime after the first of the year. Kusilek said that the committee has not yet decided what type of fundraiser they will have. A silent auction or raffle are just a couple of the ideas they have come up with, she said. "The most requested works will be of animals, either domestic or wild, or pastural scenes. (Mediums can be anything from) glass blowing to oils to sculpture, jewlery or fibers," she said. 1 0 1 . I - 0. - 0 1 - - - a D - 0 , a Kusilek pointed out that the off -leash dog parks are quite a social spot for people of all ages. All the walls are dropped, she said, 20-year-olds talk to 65-year-olds who talk to 1 0-year-olds. "Dogs are an incredible buffer," she said. "People open up and let their guard down because they have a common bond." Kusilek said that the time has come for River Falls to open an off -leash dog park because there is no place in town for people to take their dogs. http://www.uwrf.edu/student-voice/issues/1996/1996oct3/970409.htmi 7/10/01 "Bark Park" may bring new freedoms to dog owners Page 3 of 3 River Falls has leash laws that require dog -owners to keep their animals on leashes no longer than six -feet. Kusilek said that this is to allow owners to have as much control over their dogs as possible. "There is no where to run dogs (in River Falls)," Kusilek said. "They can't (take dogs off -leash) in the tree line area above Hoffman Park, and there used to be a problem of people sneaking into the cemetary to run their dogs, but now it's completely off-limits to dogs." Kusilek and the "Bark Park" committee are still looking for anyone who would like to volunteer time and energy to see the off -leash dog park become a reality. 17M RMAR-07 10 1_11 TAIM: Wil PNEIGM, I ovirz I U 3 F Or 55,I10MOT-11, LGIMB,r�l.qL*llt-lxgrmtlsm,or-Blerio'LO.LzjrL.,M�tagawr*-,N.l�i,m,NI WEE I I �1�740 0 1996 The Student Voice Montana Kaimin Online Page 1 of 3 Local activists ra[l a ainst Rock Creek mine Report: Montana colleges earn subpar grades ASUM to look at reinstall inq 'dead week' Officials identify victim of apartment fire Petition for Denver - Spokane railroad at UC Violence New York Citv Council takes much -needed step against sexual. violence New 'Bark Park' lets clogs roam leashless Nate schweber Montana Kaimin Who let the dogs out? Missoula Parks and Recreation did. Beginning Wednesday, six acres of Jacobs Island are now Bark Park, a place where dog owners can take their pets and let them exercise without a leash. Missoula resident Jeannie Winslow is happy about Bark Park, but not as happy as her two golden retrievers Taz and Aggie. "This is easy to get to," Winslow said. "find when you live in town there's not a lot of places to go. This is a great place to take your dogs to let them run around." Missoula Parks and Recreation director Jim Vanfossen said Bark Park was created in response to dog owners complaints of leash laws. Gr ba fac a ch; ag Za AP Stz no str to the col Fa qiv Gr SG Th An WE en be Cr Dc life http://N"viN,.kaimin.org/DecOOi12-7-00/*newsl-12-7-OO.htint 7/ 10%O 1 Montana Kaimin Online Page 2 of 3 Campus Voices UM looks stable for soring, despite hard times Lido Vizzutti/Montana Kaimin ,Jennifer Kettenfing and her son Hayden play fetch with their dog, Jack, Wednesday morning at the new Bark Park across the trail from Jacob's Island. "Often times when Animal Control stops somebody for violating the leash law, that person says, there's nowhere to go,"' Vanfossen said. "Weil, now there is." Vanfossen said Parks and Recreation held a public meeting with Animal Control and discussed ways to accommodate the pet owners in Missoula. Vanfossen said he recently called the family who donated Jacob's Island to the city in 1976 and they were in favor of turning part of it into Bark Park. Jacobs Island is nine acres and Bark Park takes up the easternmost six acres. Vanfossen said that's great for dog owners because not only is there ample land for dogs to run around on, but there's great access to the river as well. Vanfossen said the city chose Jacobs Island for Bark Park because of its close proximity to the Kim Williams Trail, downtown Missoula, the Rattlesnake and UM. Arlee resident Sheryl Tegelberg agrees. "I'm tickled to see something like this," Tegelberg said. "I often bring my dog into town with me and this gives me a place to go to let the dog out." Tegelberg spent time in Bark Park Wednesday afternoon throwing a frisbee to her black lab -retriever mix Sheena. "If people don't abuse this, hopefully the city will keep it open and open more places like it," Tegelberg said, Vanfossen said the city will look at opening more areas like Bark Park depending on public response to the leashless area. Vanfossen stressed that there are rules at Bark Park. They include not bringing aggressive dogs into the park, owners cleaning up after their dogs, and putting them back on a leash once they leave the park. "There were probably about 25 dogs and their owners down there today," Vanfossen said. "I think it's going to be a real popular area." Back to Front ft,,e http://Www.kaimin.org/DecOO/12-7-00/newsl-12-7-OO.html 7/10/01 Montana Kaimin Online Page 3 of 3 Feedback Comments? Questions? Suggestions? ]E-mail the webmaster at nnaueneaunhotmail.com. You can also send a letter to the editor to editorna.selway.umt.edu. Please include you full name, address, and current phone number so that we can verify the letter's authenticity. Keep letters under 300 words. http://www.kaimin.org/Dec00/12-7-00/news 1_12-7-OO.html 7/10/01 MMMM�� Page I of I A oU a"rQJ6�i6�essp !"M nd ad The Public -Use Exercise and Agility Course For Dogs The ever-increasing growth of urban areas has made open space for dogs increasingly scarce. Bark ParkTm offers pet owners the opportunity to exercise and socialize their dogs in a secure enviroment. Dog ownership is growing and currently represents 28% of the population. This poses new challenges that require the re -thinking of the municipal park, resdential commuunities, and other spaces where pets and people can happily co-exiist. The Bark ParkTm has been developed to benefit the health and well being of dogs and the quality of life in our communities. Bark Park is fun for Dogs! WHY CHOOSE A Bark Pawkl" QUALYT YSPECI FICATIONS, Bark ParkTM designs meet the needs All heavy duty steel parts are double of pets based on size and physical corrosion protected with zinc ability by providing seperate areas for galvinization and brightly powder -coated large and small dogs. for long lasting color Bark ParkTm provides a safe and UV -stabilized colorful plastic panels . secure enviroment for dogs to are .850" thick high -density socalize and exercise freely. polyethylene. The Bark Park7mcourse offers pets a Standing and sitting surfaces are non - challenging enviroment that promotes skid recylced rubber matting discipline and exercise. Bark Park's Tm off -leash areas provide All stainless steel welded construction dogs an unrestricted enviroment and stainless steel vandal resistant without infringing on the rights of hardware. other park visitors. b-orne- I aboutusI rMu_Q_st_?_catalog I co_ntac Lis I what we offer Copyright 0 2000 Playground Designs, Inc. All tights reserved. Revised: site designed by Jame s Warner Pro -Web http://www.playgrounddesigns.com/htmVbark.htmi 7/10/01 Bark Park Honolulu Rules & Regulations Page 1 of 2 1. Pet owners must accept full responsibility for themselves and their pets while in the park. 2. Puppies and dogs must be properly inoculated, be healthy (have no contagious conditions or diseases), and be parasite -free (both internally and externally). 3. Dog owners must carry a leash. Please bring dogs to and from the park on leash. Dogs should wear their license or identification. 4. Dogs showing aggressiveness towards people or other dogs must be leashed immediately. 5. No dogs known to be aggressive towards other dogs or people (or exhibiting any threatening behavior) may enter the park. 6. Dogs must be under voice control and within sight of their owners. Please control excessive barking. 7. Owners must clean up feces deposited by dogs. 8. No bitches in heat may enter the park. 9. Parents should refrain from bringing toddlers and small children under 10 years of age into the http://www.barkpark-honolulu.org/rules.htm 7/10/01 F.-MM.WMAIMMI MM���� Page 2 of 2 park unless they are willing to keep the children out of harms way and accept full responsibility for their safety. 10. Do not bring rawhide, pigs ears, or food into the park as dogfights may result. 11. Avoid over exercising your dog on very hot days. BA ck to http://www.barkpark-honolulu.org/rules.htm 7/10/01 RISKMail Archive: Re: Risk Management for Public Park "Dog Runs" Page I of 2 0x1e: Risk Management for Public Park "Dog Runs" Gloria Wolk ( ggwolk@Viatical-Expert.net) Wed, 04 Apr 200110:05:08 -0 700 • Messages sorted by: I date If thread 1[ sub - iect If author I • Previous message: Vance, Beaumont W.: "RE: Risk Mana2ement Seminar for CEO" • Next message: AAust&a�aQ1 cam_"Re: Loss Freciuencv Database" • Maybe in reply to: Donald E. Dodson: "Risk Management for Pubfic Park "Doe Runs.... I live in Orange County, CA, where we have a number of Bark Parks and more in the planning stage. Laguna Beach B.P., the first, is fenced off from the road and partially fenced on two sides, but open to the canyon -- not good for beagles and huskies, which will run until they drop. This park has grass and is shut down whenever there is rain; still, there are mud puddles (which labs and Great Pyranees love). Parking is a problem. The second was built by Costa Mesa, a section of a public park with other facilities (i.e., tennis). Completely fenced, with huge old eucalyptus trees (anti -flea trees), grass, and park workers close and lock the gates religiously at sundown. The third was opened in Laguna Niguel, completely fenced, ground covered with mulch (wood chips) which minimizes bacteria and is easier to clean and allows it to be open every day of the year, regardless of weather. Irvine recently opened a park that (being Irvine) is the first to have lights and is open until 9 PM. Fenced, grass, which requires maintenance, closed on Wednesdays for maintenance, and closed whenever it rains (the folks and dogs then go to Laguna Niguel). Irvine also has a small area set aside for people who have small dogs and fear of big dogs. Those who have small and big dogs are able to mingle in the bigger area. (Some small dogs prefer big dogs -- such as Jack Russell Terriers.) All have signs at the outside gate with instructions. Supply doggie poop bags and pooper scoopers (for the huge mounds or messy poop). Prohibit people from bringing food into the park. There are people who consider this a picnic area, free wild animal farm, and bring little kiddies and Wendy burgers and fries -- and cause a riot. Clean up always is a problem, primarily with those who drop by for a day, when they don't know what else to do. The "regulars" tell them to clean up (cries of "Poop Patrol!"), sometimes to no avail. http://www.riskmail.org/archive/aprOl/00000033.htm' 7/10/01 RISKMail Archive: Re: Risk Management for Public Park "Dog Runs" Page 2 of 2 Children are a risk for pet owners. Most people who bring children to bark parks are the dumbest parents in Orange County. Essential is to have a water fountain for dogs, and one for people; disabled parking near the entrances; double gates so that when someone is entering or leaving, other dogs cannot run out; benches for those who are unable to stand or play with their dogs (or are lazy). No fire hydrants. It is impractical to threaten to revoke access since the parks cannot be policed other than by the "regulars" for whom the park becomes an important part of their lifestyle. One of the lovely things about bark park, other than the freedom to play with your dog off -leash, is that people have opportunities to make friends of those who are vastly different in age, socioeconomics, religious and ethnic background, etc. There is a commonality among dog lovers, similar to the universal language of music. When I had to euthanize my older dog, that night I went to bark park with the younger one and many of my two -legged friends came over to hug me and share their stories, some with tears. Bark Parks are a great asset for a community. Now I would never choose to live in an area that had none. (Let me know when yours is open; I may visit ....) Gloria Wolk Author and consumer advocate http _//xv�,_ Viatical-Ex ert.net RISKMail ... is what you've just finished reading. 1. To subscribe, send e-mail to list@riskmaii.org with the message "join RISKMall". 2. To unsubscribe, send e-mail to list@riskmail.org with the message "leave RISKMall". There is also a RISKMail account center on the web at_h_ttp.-//riskmail.ora_/account_htm where you can edit your personal subscription profile. If you have subscription problems, send e-mail to listmaster@riskmail.org, NOT riskmail@riskmaiLorg. • Previous message: Vance, Beaumont W.: "RE: Risk Management Seminar for CEO" • Next message: Ad_iustR c aol.com: "Re: Loss Frequency Database" • Maybe in reply to: Donald E. Dodson: "Risk Management for Public Park "Doe Runs"" http://www.riskmaii.org/archive/apr01/00000033.htm 7 7/10/01 RISKMail Archive: Risk Management for Public Park "Dog Runs" Page I of 2 Donald E. Dodson ( (no email) ) Wed, 4 Apr 200109:05:16 -0700 • Messages sorted by: I date I F thread 11 sub) ect 11 author ] • Previous message: Marshall. Chuck C: "RE: Risk Manai4ement Seminar for CEO" • Next message: Gary Richman: "Fidelity Bonds" • Next in thread: Gloria Wolk: "Re: Risk Mana�4ement for Public Park "Qo., R.LITTs'"" ----- ------- - ------- --- Dear PRIMATalkers & RISKMailers: I am working on managing the risks for a pending leash -less dog run in our busiest City park. The City Council wants it, period! I envision Syd Sadistic playing "lets get the squirrels" with his Rotweller "Drooler," who guards Syds meth lab. Henri LeFinique is playing rubber chewy -checkers with his pet miniature poodle "Fifi." "Drooler" mistakes "Fifi" as squirrel chow and swallows "Fifi." A bystander's 3 year old runs over to pet "Drooler" is also mistaken for squirrel chow ... =20 This is an unsupervised park that is open to the public from dawn to dusk. Public Works Parks crews mow, cleaning restrooms, etc. Here's what I can think of so far: 1) Fence the area 2) Some kind of signage attempting to convey "use at your own risk:" City is not responsible for any injury to people, animals or property loss, etc. What languages? What picto-grams? (Maybe a toddler 1/2 in and 1/2 out of "Droolees" mouth???) 3) Users must clean up after themselves and their dogs (?? Does that include the biohazard waste disposal of what's left of the 3 year old?) 4) Access is revocable at any time with no prior warning. 5) Park staff is not responsible for assisting with control of animals. Give them the phone number for our Animal Control Officer (who works nominal 40 hours / week M-Th). 6) Provide animal fecal removal training to a special squad of Park Maintenance employees. (I can see the next MOU now, "Pooper-Scooper Pay" differentials.) What else should I be recommending? Thanks for your brain -power. Don D.' Donald E. Dodson, ARM, CPDM Risk Manager City of La Mesa (CA/LJS) Voice: 619.667.1178 Fax: 619.667.1163 E: ddodsongci.la-mesa.ca.us http://www.riskmail.org/archive/apr0l/00000028,htin - 7/10/01 RISKMail Archive: Risk Management for Public Park "Dog Runs" Page 2 of 2 RISKMail ... is what you've just finished reading. I. To subscribe, send e-mail to list@riskmail.org with the message "join RISKMail". 2. To unsubscribe, send e-mail to list@riskmaii.org with the message "leave RISKMail". There is also a RISKMail account center on the web at http://n*skmail.or2/account.hti-n where you can edit your personal subscription profile. If you have subscription problems, send e-mail to listtnastergriskmaii.org, NOT riskmailgriskmail.org. • Previous message: Marshall. Chuck C: "RE: Risk Management Seminar-foCEO" -------------r - • Next message: Gary Richman: "Fidelity Bonds" • Next in thread® (ilona Wolk: "Re: R.Isk Malia(_,ement for Public Park "Doa Runs"" - I . 1111 1 1-, 11 11 - 1 111. -1--.1- ill -1- .- �.., �. - - I - � � _ - — � �'. , �'. http://www.riskmail.org/archive/aprOl/00000028.htm ' 7/10/01 Dogpark.com - Dog Park News Page I of 5 channels, t�lp F,i�L�7 ne,,vvetl ers- womens fo r u m -com, aboutWF e, n acing Second M Vebtconsolldafi6ri: r 0i M-oo. g U C. C Repofter Dogs, in the News Dogpark News and Announcements )oin Our Birtt,,day Are you forming a group to start a ClUb dogpark? Did a local dogpark just open? loin our Do9park News mailing TPke 041(SUrVC- Are you planning an event to gain support list! Enter your email address y below then click the '3ain List' for a dogpark? button- Dogpark Announcements If you've got anything you'd like us to E-Wents know about a dogpark, please tell us and _NL aT we'll print it here. From fundraisers to city i by �:.!%Bat council meetings, from parties to parades - we want to help get the word out about all the hard work. you put into your dogpark. Please give us at least four weeks advance notice if you have an event, and send your news to p-r-Irk,nes.,vsC�l�-dogriark..c-cr,,i. MaYL 2001,-. Do9park News New dog parks! -- Orlando(Sanford), FL ip aw Flark, of i-fistoric Sanford 427 French Ave(US Hwy 17-92) Located in the Historic District of Sanford Open 7:30 A.M. - 7:30 P.M. Features: Fenced, Double Gated Entrance, Benches, Tables, Self Watering Bowls, Dog Showers, Small Dog Area, Poopbag Dispensers, Parking, Handicap Access, Community Bulletin Board, Nicely Shaded. *Pompano Beach, FL T11'e. Balrkifi.g Lgt (Opening soon) This will be a great place to bring your dog if you live in the Pompano Beach area, or even just close to it! Dogs will have a great time with the agility equipment, water stations, and sectioned off puppy playground! For More Information, or If You Would Like to Contribute E-Mail us At: BarkJ.ngLqtP@r.k@AOL.Cqm! Thanks a Bunch! Cedar Rapids, IA Cheyenne Park. OILA.Arela (Opening August 2001) This 25-acre fenced park is opening in August 2001 - check the website for opening details and to volunteer. * Ellicott City, MD http://www.dogpark.com/reportparknews.htrni 7/10/01 Page 2 of 5 Howard County Dog Park County . ..... (Opening Summer 2001) Check the, website for opening details and to volunteer. * St. Louis, MO PeQ.ple For, Dogs This 2-year old group is getting closer to obtaining several dog parks in the St. Louis area. Check the website for details and to volunteer, R * A committee has formed to build a new dog park in Orlando (Sanford). * St Louis: The dog park group formed to develop an off -leash park as a new name. Anyone interested in helping should contact People for D, 0. G. S. * Harrisonburg, PA: A group has formed to establish DIPPS off -leash park in this area. For more information contact them by ennail. Septeinber 200,0,- New Dogparks &_ Dog -park News Prescott, AZ Willow Creek. Dog Park Located at on Willow Creek Road, just north of Willow Lake Road; Due to Open mid -October 2000, this 3-acre site is a public ' /private partnership with the city, the dogpark group and local businesses. It will have water and a separate area for small (Jogs, Citrus Heights, ("A POOCH off -leash dog park Oak Avenue, off Sunrise Blvd Hours: dawn to dusk Fenced, tables, trees parking, restroorns., water, trash, handicap access Our new park is finally a reality, Grand Opening scheduled for Oct 2000; it's over two acres, fenced, double -gated, lots of trees and good parking; open year 'round. Ladera, CA La.derafDog Park O'Neil Drive The Ladera Dog Park Committee tells us that this new park is UNDER CONSTRUCTION and due to opri sorne time in 2001/2002, Aurora, CO Aurora Off -Leash Dog Park 4700 E. Quincy Ave, west of Quincy Reservoir, just east of Pitkin street Open dawn to dusk Fenced, handicap access, parking, water, trash. comments -.After 8 years, this park is open! Come see mai ty happy dogs play peaceably off -leash, Colorado Springs., CO Palmer Park Located on Maizeland and Academy Fenced, benches, tables, handicap access, parking, water, trash, poopbags, phones, restroorns. Comments = this is the first fenced dog park in Colorado Springs; it's located at a very large regional park, so there are pleny of amenities for everybody. Tampa, FL Tampa plans to open four new off -leash parks this year: http://www.dogpark.com/reportparknews.html 7/10/01 Dogpark.com - Dog Park News Page 3 of 5 Gadsden Park - 6901 S. MacDill Avenue; Al Lopez Park, 4810 N. Himes Avenue; Davis Island, near the boat ramps on the east side of the Seaplane Basin; Rowlett Park, 2401 Yukon Street. Atlanta,, GA Working for an off -leash park in Atlanta is the Brookhaven Park., Social Ke.n.ne.l Club.. Visit their website for more information, Sandy, UT A group has formed to start a dog park in this town. Contact their for more information. Lake Orion, M1 Q.Tio.D.-O.a.ks Bark-Par1k. Joslyn Road, south of Clarkston Road (park at the north Joslyn R.oad entrance and follow the signs) Orion Oaks County Park's new bark park offers a 7-acre, fenced are for off -leash dogs! Play games and run in wide-open fields, explore the woods or (dogs only) go jump in the lake! Enclosure contains two trails totaling 1/2 mile, an area for field training and a special portion of Lake Sixteen reserved just for canine swimmers. Proper licenses and vaccinations required., adult human must accompany dogs at all tirnes, dogs n-iust be under voice control. Annual vehicle permit needed for entry. New 'Vork, NY Chelsea Waterside Park 11th Avenue, West 22nd Street, near West Side Hwy Due to open 9-15-00; one of the anchors of an entirely new park in NYC- - the first time a dog parkhas been designed into the original nnaster plan for a city park. lune 2000: New Dogparks, &. Dogpark News *- Lexington, KY: A second dogpark. is under development - to help, or for -more information contact Lexington- Fayette Urban County Government Mayor at irlayor@11fuc-g.co-r-i - Frick Park Off -Leash Exercise Area; 10 minute walk from Frick Park. entrance all, Beechwood Blvd and Nicholson Street; PittsbUrgh's first official dogpark! * Dogpark supporters in Louisville, KY have found a site for a proposed off -leash area in Seneca Park, Contact the Loulsville, Dog Rain Associaition at their website. May 2000.- New Do9parks & Dogpark News a NYC gets a new dogpark - Thomas Jefferson Park is located on First Ave and FDR Drive bewtween E 11th and E 14th. The organizing group is still adding 'comforts' to the park, and are very excited to have it open! * KC SCOOP (Kansas City Society of Canine Owners for Off -leash Park) has formed to develop off -leash areas for central Kansas City. To help or for more info, email them, - Upland, California has added a new dogpark, opening soon. Visit our CA listing page for location. - St. Augustine, FL opened St. Johns County Paw Park on April 1, 2000. A dedicated group of citizens funded and completed the park in just four month! Congratulations to all for a great effort. 'ntip:/"/`www.a'ogpar'K.comj'reponparKnews.n-unt //IU/Ul Dogpark. co m - Dog Park News * Pawtucket, R1 has a group of citizens forming up to start a dogpark within the city. For more information or to help, er ' na " i I the ' m, - We hear that Norfolk, VA is in the process of opening 11 areas in the city for use as dogparks. * A group of dog lovers in Tampa, FL has formed to start a dogpark after a leash law enforcement crackdown. Davis beach is the area most affected - visit the we.bsite for more information. o St. Augustine, FL opened St. Johns County Paw Park on April 1, 2000. A dedicated group of citizens funded and completed the park in just four month! Congratulations to all for a great effort. New Dagparks Roundup a Denver, CO opens its first ever dogpark in a football sized field behind the Division of Animal Conti -of (666 S. Jason Street). Mayor Mary Webb promises a second dogpark will be open near Stapleton Airport this year. in other Colorado news, the citizens of Aspen are supporting a proposed dogpark - the City Council will hear the matter soon, - St. Clair Shores, MI is very interested in a dogpark and is gathering general information. Express your support of the dogpark. by phoning Greg Essler at Parks & Recreation (810-445-5350), - Dogpark supporters in Louisville,, KY have formed a group to open an off -leash area at Ciberokee Park. Contact the Louisville Dog Run Association at their website, New Year, New- Dogparks In dogpark news, a group is forming in Virginia BeachVA. For rnore-, info contact happyone@pilot.infi.net. Also in Virginia, OAKTON DOGS has formed to be the sponsor group for the off -leash park at Blake Lane Park. For more info contact oaktondogs@i-nailcity,com. St. Augustine, FL has received approval to develop a dogpark site in Treaty park, and finally, MROMP has received funding for TEN new dogparks in Minneapolis. Woof! Three New Dogparks for Pittsburgh Pittsburgh will becorne home to four new dogparks. next spring, If Mayor Tom Muphy appproves legislation, off -leash areas will open at Frick Park, Highland Park. and West Park. The dogparks will be funded in part by an increase in dog license fees, and monies gathered will go to create and maintain the fenced off -leash areas, New Dogparks for Arizona f Colorado Arizona: The Chandler Bark Park, located at 4500 S. Alma School Road at the Chandler Regional Sports Complex has just opened. It offers training obstacles such as a see -saw, balance beam, tunnel, hurdles and a large A -frame. Future plans include a dog drinking fountain, additional fighting and possibly, a ramada. Open to the public except when Chandler Police K-9 units and dog obedience training classes are scheduled. Colorado: Aurora Off-LeashDog Park has been approved after 7 years, Located at 4700 E. Quincy Ave, west of Quincy Reservoir, just east of Pitkin Street, fence posts were installed by volunteers on 'Make a Difference Day", fencing is being installed and water is planned for Spring 2000. New Dogparks open in New Jersy,, Idaho Dogs in Lincroft, New 3ersey are excited about the opening of Thompson http://www.dogpark.com/reportparknews.html o 7/10/01 Page 5 of 5 Park Dog Run. Monmouth County's forst legal off -leash park, it's fully fenced and loaded with amenities. Boise, Idaho welcomes its first dogpark at Military Reserve, a temporary site while more permanent options are explored. Gordon Gilmer Canine Park opened October, 31 with a costume party and 'leash cutting'. Located in Eagle Creek Park, the dog park is dedicated to Gordon Gilmer, who represented this area on the city council for almost 30 years. His dog, MacKenzie, will hold Pooch Pass #1. Dayton, 0H Dog Park Group Forms A new group is forming to create an off -leash parle in Dayton, For more info visit their website. Escondido,, CA. Plans a New Dog Park The Escondido City Council has approved plans for a dogpark at the Magnolia Tree site on Valley Center Road, The site, just south of the Dixon Lake Water Filtration Plant, will be developed into a tvto-acre off - leash park.. Sierra Madre,,, CA Opens New Dog Park On September 25, 1999, a ribbon -cutting ceremony was held to open a dogpark in Sierra Madre. in less 'Chan 18 months, residents and city officials were able to work together to create this off -leash area, a feat all the snore remarkable given the towns size. at only three square rniles, the dedication of limited green space to this valuable recreation form is to be applauded. In the neighboring town of Pasadena, residents have beer trying to get a dogpark open since 1988. Congratulations to everyone In Sierra Madre on their tremendous accomplishment. Cypress, CA Plans a New Dog Park Qypress 1)oo Park is in the early stages of site selection. We are looking to other' communities to get ideas for fund-raising. To date, we have over. 400 residents on our mailing list and that number is growing daily. We hope to be up and running within the next 6 - 9 months. Dallas Dog Park Group Forms A new group is forming to create an off -leash park in Dallas. To 4oin the group, or for more information, contact or .. .. ... .... .. visit their tAeebsite, http://www.dogpark.com/reportparknews.html 7/10/01 Pagel of Canine Politics: Dogs Ready for a Romp in the Park By Carol Wersich, Evansville Courier & Press Staff Writer, November 21, 1999 Jake really, really enjoys his strolls on a leash each morning around Wesselman Park. He can't get enough of the outings, judging from the pudgy, friendly Golden Retriever's wide toothy grins, frequent sniffing and sprightly stride. After nearly 10 years' worth of visits, the pooch is affectionately dubbed "the mayor of Wesselman" by park goers and Helen Pritchett and her dog, Jake, administrators. But Jake dreams of romps cross paths with another couple of Wesselman Park regulars, Donna off his leash — to hang with other pooches, Kennedy and her Lhasa Apso, share bite -size snacks, bark and choose trees Casey. The women and dogs as he pleases, say his owners, Helen and exchanged pleasantries & continued Raymond Pritchett. their morning routines. Jake, a 10- Keep the faith, Jake. Evansville city park year -old Golden Retriever, smiles officials and a committee of dog lovers are for a portrait Thursday morning at currently studying ways to establish the citv's Wesselman Park. His owner, HelenPritchett, hopes a "bark park" can first exclusive dog park, or "bark park," for be created where dogs can roam Jake and up to 99 other dogs at a time. free. Photo -Randy Greenwell The trendy dog park could happen as early as the coming year, say planners. The specific park still is to be determined and so are all the details, including financing. The idea is to allow dogs to develop social skills and enjoy leash -free play in a large secured environment. The dogs' owners would supervise from ringside while getting acquainted, themselves, with the other owners through swapping pet stories. http://landofpuregold.com/news 156. htm 7/10/01 Page 2 of 3 Alice James, director of the Wesselman Woods Nature Preserve and owner of two dogs, serves on the city's dog park planning committee. "I love my dogs both Labrador Retrievers — and I love talking to other dog owners," she said recently. "I have goosebumps thinking about the dog park. The dogs could pick their buddies and start cliques like we humans." The canine park could include an agility zone, a doggies snack stand and a row of fire hydrants to boot. Fire hydrants? "Now there's an idea that's pretty cute," said Jim Haddan, city parks director, who also is on the committee. "I'll bet the fire department would donate some hydrants," James said. The planners also envision dog health fairs, official leash -cutting ceremonies, howling contests and bobbing for bones in the park. Signs with sponsors' names could line the dog park fence similar to those hung around ball fields, James said. And if this isn't going too far, maybe the dogs could be taught how to read the signs? "I don't think so," she said. Only dogs that meet certain requirements would be electronically admitted via a microchip reader. The dogs would need to be nonaggressive and not in heat. They also would need to be at least four months old and up to speed with their vaccinations and rabies shots. Any breed would be accepted as long as it was well-behaved. "Any dog that attacked or was otherwise aggressive would be out in a flash. Zero tolerance would be enforced," James said. The owners would be required to clean up after their pets. Dogs still could be walked elsewhere in city parks, but only on leashes. Mark Dessauer, a local dog enthusiast, went before the city parks board a few weeks ago with the dog park idea. The board liked it and the study committee was developed to also include Kendall Paul of the Vanderburgh Humane Society, Nancy Naylor of the Evansville Obedience Club and Dessauer. "It's a great idea for providing a safe and clean location for dog owners and dogs to mingle," Haddan believes. "All is merely conceptual at this point but it should happen sometime in the new year." The main expenses are expected to be the fencing and the microchip reader. Pooch passes would likely cost $25 for a year. Day passes also could be provided, James said. She would like to see the local park established on two acres in the 75-acre Wesselman Park. http://Iandofpuregold.com/news156.httn 7/10/01 Dog parks in Valley really hit the spot Pagel of 4 casino New IrGmi'K hers for FR E (A IECK1M! and azwntral.com FREE ONI Il`vI; Ii1�dAIN(; fun r az, PIt.:Uslfo\,%lb::m tia.u. - the Re ,tkiZONAA )iUm i. i�,, I_ii iii r i, i,l„r, 1 '.i.ami ij ul i i �P,i i , Pi r,. .�n u „i.ri i. � ni vie uI iL I i uan ui .,ilnu ii•.i^ywx gh' World €and '�nliat€€ rh R!I. 16,-:ru R, ta€�Wi 1e-I ��,c:.w Altei + Rczp rl NUNBC e 4' lt" s ° = c€� a €;a Traffic Information r sl3nrrs �e � ph.ot )s of the �i+. Education ducati n e-mail ,�.�" rt,aia this Print this s€ory newsletters Click here to get free customized Dog parks in Valley really hit the information delivered to you spot automatically via i e-mail. free e-mail Click here to get a free azcentral.com Barbara Yost e-mail account, or The Arizona Republic to sign in to your existing account. May. 9, 2001 quids links Pink poodles in rhinestone collars used to be the height free postcards of canine indulgence. message boards Joshua G. Weisberg/The Arizona Republic Today, Fifi has her own furniture, mink coat, hiking oso, an Australian shepherd, gets in a serious boots, premium dog food and workout at the off -leash area of Chaparral Park, gourmet biscuits. Now the Scottsdale, a canine testimonial to the rising latest doggone amenity: dog popularity of dog parks. parks, known in the recreation trade as "off -leash activity areas." The trend that began on the East and West coasts 10 to 15 years ago is racing into the Valley with the speed of a greyhound. In three years, six communities have constructed 11 off -leash areas, including three each in Tempe and Scottsdale. And more are under way. 'These are coming in leaps and bounds," said Christy Hill, recreation coordinator for Scottsdale. "It's an up-and-coming trend." Phoenix, however, remains without a dog park, something a grass- roots organization hopes to rectify. Dog parks don't come cheap. Gilbert is spending $25,000 to develop a 2-acre fenced dog park with doggie drinking fountains and benches. Scottsdale spent $15,000 to start a 2-acre dog park, costing about $30,000 annually to maintain. Those maintenance costs run twice that of a regular park because of http://www.azcentral.com/news/0509dogparkO9.htrnl 7/10/01 Dog parks in Valley really hit the spot Page 2 of 4 turf upkeep, waste disposal and supplies of poop bags, said Doug Nohren, recreation coordinator at Scottsdale's Chaparral Park. Is it worth the cost? Definitely, Nohren said, adding that intense use shows "there's a need for it." Many of the parks are well appointed. Two parks in Chandler feature agility courses. Tempe's Mitchell Park has two wading pools. Most dog owners are happy with just the basics: fenced lawn, a few benches and a supply of poop bags or mutt mitts. Park users say the venues give humans and pets a chance to commune with nature and meet other dog lovers, who know each other as D Bear's mummy or Bo's daddy. "It's the most friendly place you've been to except for a bar in Chicago," said Debbie May, who takes her dogs to the Snedigar Sportsplex Bark Park in Chandler. For dogs, it's a chance to cut loose and snub leash laws. "Dogs have a need for socializing, pack involvement and exercise," said Donn Moseley, a member of Paws at the Park, a volunteer group that monitors the off -leash area at Scottsdale's Chaparral Park. Chance to exercise Moseley, who makes and sells hats for dogs, comes to the park with his pups, Marvin the dachshund and Bit the Yorkshire terrier, who sports a tiny floral visor. On a Friday afternoon, they might meet miniature schnauzers Miss Schwartz, with her human companion Pat Liehr, and Jacqueline, owned by Jane Ramsberger. Ramsberger explained, "Jacqueline's an only dog, so it's nice for her to have other dogs around." Liehr lives in a condo and said the dog park is Miss Schwartz's only chance to exercise. Even people with generous back yards enjoy the parks. May takes her dogs to the Chandler Bark Park nearly every morning, though they have room to run at home. After an hour at play, "they'll sleep all day long, and it saves my furniture," May said as her husky and black Lab raced by, paws thundering like a herd of buffalo. Good neighbors Although dog parks can initially draw controversy from neighbors fearing noise, odors and canine miscreants, communities have found http://www.azcentral.com/news/0509dogparkO9.html " 7/10/01 Dog parks in Valley really hit the spot Page 3 of 4 the parks cause few problems. "It's excellent. Its very popular," Bob Rhodes, parks supervisor for the central district in Glendale, said of his city's year -old dog park at 63rd Avenue and Mountain View. At first skeptical, Rhodes has become a believer. "We have people from all over the Valley here," he said. "It's beyond my wildest belief it could happen." Glendale's park has proved so popular the city is building a second venue at 57th Avenue and Union Hills. If creating parks just for dogs sounds indulgent, supporters say many dog owners have no children, so they don't take advantage of fields for Little League, soccer or T-ball. For the elderly and disabled, dog parks offer an opportunity to exercise pets easily and safely. Scottsdale's Hill said catering to dog owners is no different from serving golfers or tennis players. 'This is about people who choose to recreate with their dogs," she said. "We're listening to our citizens." Gilbert's first dog park, at Crossroads Park, is scheduled to open in mid -June, which is none too soon for Tami Pschierer, who drives 20 minutes to take her husky mix, Madison, to the Shawnee Bark Park in Chandler. 'There's such a strong need for it" in Gilbert, she said. Phoenix shortage Dog owners in Phoenix are hoping for similar action. Nancy Calkins heads a group of volunteers that has petitioned the City Council to create off -leash areas in several suggested locations. With about 170 recreation areas in Phoenix, Calkins said, "You'd think there'd be at least one for dogs." Jim Burke, deputy director of Phoenix Parks, Recreation and Library, said the city's newest proposed park, Deem Hills at 51 st Avenue and Jomax, includes plans for a 3-acre off -leash area. The park is scheduled to get under way in summer 2002. Another dog park is under consideration at a central location, Burke said. Volunteer groups such as Paws at the Park can enhance efficiency. In Fountain Hills, ADOG helps patrol Desert Vista Park's 31/2-acre off - leash area, cleaning up waste, banishing aggressive dogs and raising funds for park improvements. This summer, Desert Vista will add three shade structures, one of http://www.azcentral.com/news/0509dogparkO9.html ' 7/10/01 Dog parks in Valley really hit the spot Page 4 of 4 which was paid for by AD®G. Don't assume dog owners are foolishly indulging their pooches with the newest fad, cautioned Moseley, the canine haberdasher. 'We're caring, loving people," he said with a smile. "Dog parks, with their popularity, will persevere." Reporter Senta Scarborough contributed to this article. &-fmli area silwy D print. this story world & nation I the buzz I Arizona Republic front pages I allergy report I politics scanners I traffic information I obituaries I photos of the month I education site map I azcentral.com main I news I sports I entertainment I money I community I computing travel I home & garden I health I fun & games I classifieds I weather I maps customer service I terms of service I contact us I Arizona Republic archives subscribe to The Arizona Republic I Republic photo store Copyright 2001, azcentrai.com. All rights reserved. USA Today I Gannett Co. Inc. I Gannett Foundation http://www.azcentral..com/news/0509dogparkO9.html 7/10/01 Communities consider parks just for the dogs - 01/04/01 Page 1 of 2 Homepage Search CyberSurveys PNews Talk ►Sports Talk wLions Talk *-Wings Talk *-Car Talk ,-Tech Talk Horoscope Hot Sites Lottery Weather Staff Autos *-Auto Show aJoyrides Business Careers Columnists Commuting Detroit History Editorials Health Metro/State i-Livingston r Macom b 9-Oakland *-Wayne FOn Detroit Nation/World Obituaries ,-Death Notices Politics Real Estate Religion Schools Special Reports Technology Sports Home ,-Lions/NFL rPistons/NBA FRed Wings/NHL *-Shock/WNBA sTigers/Baseball •MSU b U-M More Colleges Golf High Schools Motor Sports More Sports Scoreboards ENTMANSAW Entertainment Communities consider parks just for the dogs Some say concept is nice but unworkable Bridget A. Barrett By Jennifer Brooks 6 The Detroit News BERMINGHAM -- Communities around Metro Detroit are trying to decide whether their quiet patches of parkland should go to the dogs. Birmingham is one of several communities trying to decide whether to set aside land for dog parks -- fenced -in areas for unleashed dogs and their owners to go, Mt. Clemens fenced off an acre of land for the regiods first dog park -- an experiment that local officials and dog lovers hail as a resounding success. Boomer the Labrador;: bounded through chest -high l drifts of plowed snow in r a downtown Birmingham this =� week and strained toward the inviting open spaces of the town square -- oblivious to the -. multiple No Dogs Allowed signs. Hauling him back to heel, his owner distracted him with a tennis ball and a Bridget A Barrett sympathetic scratch behind the ears. Daniels plays with Chester, one of her "It would be fantastic if there two golden retrievers, at Meiniger Park http://detnews.com/200I/metro/0101/05/dOI-171536.h'tm 7/10/01 Communities consider parks just for the dogs - 01/04/01 Page 2 of 2 ECasino Guide b,Movie Finder was someplace I could just let in Royal Oak, which is a dogs -only a -TV Listings him run wild for a while,/° paw' Crossword Features „ Jillian Clyde said. But this isn't Food the place." Open dog parks Homestyle Wine Report Neighbors around one * Mt. Clemens' Benke Memorial Dog proposed Birmingham site, Copyright 2001 The Detroit News. Park, 300 N. Groesbeck Highway. Derby Water Tower Park, * The Orion Oaks Bark Park, on Joslyn collected more than 60 Road, south of Clarkston Road in Lake Use of this site signatures in opposition, saying Orion. signifies your it would bring unwanted traffic, * In Warren, the south end of Burdi Park agreement to the m Ters of service at 12 Mile and Van Dyke. noise and waste to the area. * Three Royal Oak sites: Meiniger Park, (updated April 17, 2000). "It's not that we're against Maxwell and Famum; Wagner Park on dogs," said Paula Jones, who Detroit Avenue; Lockman Park, went door-to-door with the Connecticut south of 12 Mile. petition last fall. "The concept is a nice concept, but it's got to be workable, and a dog park just would not be workable in this area." In Mt. Clemens, Theresa Randolph, a beagle owner and director of the suburb's Parks and Recreation Department said: "Dog owners are taxpayers, too, and they deserve the same consideration as the parents of kids who play softball, or any other group with a claim to public recreation (areas)." There was enough interest in a Birmingham dog park for officials to include one in the city's five-year master plan. The Parks and Recreation Board will discuss it and other issues at its Jan. 20 meeting. "This was one of the things the public showed interest in," said parks board chairwoman Ann McBride. "One thing we all need is education, (about the good points and bad points of a dog park), if a certain site is picked.'° According to the Web site www.do"ark.com_ the nation has 474 designated dog parks -- but only seven in Michigan: Mt. Clemens' Benke Memorial Dog Park, the Orion Oaks Bark Park, Warren's Burdi Park, E-Z Dog Park in Howell and three unfenced dog friendly sites in Royal Oak at Meiniger Park, Wagner Park and Lockman Park. But Clinton Township backed away from its dog park plans after residents objected, and Farmington Hills rejected a requested dog park. Ann Arbor and West Bloomfield Township officials are considering one. You can reach Jennifer Brooks at (248) 647-8825 or Ibrooks(��detnews. com. 10. cornmeo t on this steary 1�Previous story o-Back to hidex P Next. stoq http://detnews.com/200I/metro/O101/05/dOI-171536.fitm 7/10/01 Bark Article Brooklyn Barks Back by Jane Cameron, Nadine --McGann and Kris Polisciano-Gonzalez (originally published in bftp_!/www.tbebark.com, a magazine for the modern dog enhusiast.) Where's a mile long meadow of gently rolling grass - covered slopes. It's bordered on the west by low hills and on the east by an ancient forest. On a good weekend morning you'll find hundreds of off -leash dogs— puppies careening from one new smell to the other, adolescents tumbling and growling, steady mature dogs greeting their peers and chastising the brash young. The seniors teeter along on their arthritis -stiffened legs. Then there are the people— Individuals and groups strolling casually, others standing together and catching up on the week's events. Some are flinging the projectile of their dog's preference - stick, kong, or tends ball while others Bike diligently with scarcely a glance to the side. Everybody's looking very relaxed. Where is this pastoral canine paradise' Where do dogs run free and unfettered' Where can canines enjoy such privileges as Elizabeth's corgis might envy? England? No. Brooklyn, New Fork. In the Southwest corner of the famous borough sits a crown jewel of the NYC parr system, Prospect Park° On a weekend morning with good weather is good the worlds largest off leash dog scene perennially sprouts between seven and nine o'clock a.m. That legacy included a solid oral tradition regarding off leash behavior. One of the most remarkable aspects of the Prospect Park dog scene is the general lack of conflict and good behavior of its biped and quadruped participants. New dogs and new dog owners are gently but firmly given the lay of the land by off leash veterans. Irresponsible owners and aggressive dogs are subject to a remarkably effective peer pressure system. The puppies and people http://www.offleash.com/bark.htmi 7/10/01 Bark Article 01-MEM who can get along in a social structure with many mores but no written rules soon come to adore their off leash time in the Park. Not only were there no written rules regarding park behavior, there were no written rules about the off leash hours. The local park administration extended the hours as a courtesy but was forbidden to post or write about them. This made oral communication all the more criticaL As the park and its surrounding envirolms became safer, other constituents an to compete for its precious green turf, In an effort to make room for new waves of soccer players, little leaguers and picnickers, designated off leash hours were created. From 9.00 p-mo to 9-00 a.m. dogs would be allowed off leash. This was fair from perfect. Many people's schedules simply wouldn't allow a visit to the park before 9000 a.m. But most dog Rovers accepted the schedule and set their alarms early for the morning dog walk. Others iran the risk of a $100 civil fine if they were caught off leash at the wrong hour. A smaller evening hour contingent began to come to the park. While generally well behaved and benign the evening crew clearly broke park rules and created some acrimony with other park users. But ley and large the off leash hours compromn-e worked reasonably well for nearly two decades. By the Rate 9M� trouble was brewing in paradise. The park was being visited by an estimated 6 million visitors a year. The amount of picnic garbage became daunting to dog lovers in the summer months. And complaints regarding off leash dogs increased. The park undertook a major renovation of a large portion of its woodland areas, causing much of the once open terraine to be fenced off. In early 1998, the park was subject to increasing pressure regarding off leash dogs. A vicious anti park dog article appeared in a New York magazine. While its focus was primarily Manhattan, Brooklyn felt the burn. Administrators in other New York City parks began eliminating off leash hours. The city's quality of life crime crack down also had an effect. Police now intervened in middle class activities such as bike riding, jaywalking and walking the dog off the leash. Dog walkers were being criminally summonsed and even arrested rather than fined. Doggie paradise was looking lost. Prospect Park dog walkers had to look hard at what they http://www.offleash.com/bark.html 7/10/01 Page 3 of 5 had and think through what would have to be done to maintain it. The degree of passion for the off leash scene in Prospect Park burned brighter then even its denizens imagined. Being off leash in Prospect Park was profoundly important to many people. FIDO members agreed early on that a fenced in dog run could not work in Prospect Park. There were simply too many dogs. If a good Saturday morning turned out 700 dogs in the Long Meadow, it was a political impossibility that the city would ever allocate the resources for an appropriate run. FIDO turned its energy toward the preserving and enhancing off leash hours , making them safer, cleaner, and longer. A single membership drive in November tallied up over 120 FIDO members.* Dogs and their owners have participated in park fund-raisers, lobbied legislators in Albany for more funding for the park and set up weekly night walks for those who may have been too timid to venture out after dark. FIDO is very proud to have opened up a real exchange with Prospect Park°s ornithologists. Historically, the bird - http://www.offleash.com/bark.btmi 7/ 10/01 rage,+ of -) Best of all there has even been an expansion of the official off -leash hours, the ultimate goal of dog lovers everywhere. Duiing the less populated winter months the park is off leash from 5.00 P-ma to %-00 a.m. In a less popular interior meadow is now off leash year round after 5000 on weeknights. This is extraordinary given that other New 'York City parks have lost there off leash privileges duu-ing this same time period. Some credit certainly goes to the local park administrathono Their policy of enfranchising rather than ostricizing the dog community has created an atmosphere of communication and respect, which hag resulted in More mannerly behavior on the pz� off the canine constituency. Dog lovers are more acutely aware of the needs of other park users. They are more aware of the disruption and damage dogs can cause to the park. http://www.offleash.com/bark.htmi 7/10/01 D® hopes to become a back-up resource center ° for the many strays that are abandoned in the park. There are future plans for children's educationaN programs ®n dog - related issues and the institution of community cau�ne events such as ff ybaRPm Them is talk of discounted veterinary and grooming services for FIDO member& Dog Rowers in nearby neighborhoods and smaHer parks have approached FMO for Mffor radon on how to make their areas more dogs Mendlyo MDO hopes to heRp. The organization may also join in ch"We efforts is that sire of benefit to the canine communhtyo *Current FIDO membership, just one year latter, i5 over 330 dues paying members O'Malley Engineers, LIT CITY OF COLLEGE STATION VETERANS PARK AND ATHLETIC FACILITIES OE JOB NO. 675.01 -RB July 5, 2001 PROJECT SCHEDULE Submit Final Plat, Final Plans, Final Drainage Report and Specifications to Parks Dept. July 20, 2001 Receive Review Comments on Final Plat, Final Plans, Final Drainage Report and Specifications by Parks Department August 3, 2001 Submit Final Plat, Final Plans, and Specifications to Development Services (and P & Z) August 10, 2001 Approval of Final Plat, Final Plans, and Specifications by Development Services (and P & Z) September 6, 2001 Advertise For Bids September 14, 2001 Open Bids October 12, 2001 Award Contract October 25, 2001 Contractor's Notice to Commence Work November 26, 2001 Construction Completion November 26, 2002 Craig Kankel, P.E. Robert C. Schmidt, P.E. Ed Addicks, P.E. KA675-01 Mletter\project schedule revised.doc 203 S. Jackson P. O. Box 1976 Brenham, Texas 77834-1976 (979) 836-7937 FAX (979) 836-7936 Fro-o Ric P9oer To, Key, Jane; Ruiz NalWlls 02te.. 719101 45PM ubjGet0 Camflegate We nmet Vdith IfflR�laPh" lCfips 3k" s sifternoo-n no 31ng . astkaa,e Nadis � AS you knowhe intends t�� a, dop the parks nim lf. This i4 an q�s1on in the deg icalho a ard4nance. Ii:¢a a Phiflips isnot In as big a hhuri ry as nghti nNfity bk''mugilt. We,, intend b -) sh cna,,v Viva Par Vs Board (Tuesday) a c-,onc ptual design cW the paVk end ear pWrii that Lnm,'WMI &eb back in the fflStu rs—na i dahslla d plans few their ap roa aL A number 'r of ussusa Nn'e yet, u n r lv d. 1. brat Phillips ^��,t�anis to kmo 4' mu Many Chma0firK wnflta, his wilc Mein ° kk cover.He has piated MR wnhm and at one time proposac 757for all of c sAlegen . lea smid this may,, go, up or doujim. He is daedhas1d g 8.2- , res that wili cover 834 Owlling units accord'ing to the ordinance. k-� we 3Mve him credit for the 8 4 I nod haowd do we do that du'9c6ahy? As Woad of the park board mflnnAbe. s? On the d5avdapmerat fee side It is i=a hlb n"eil r ra ila bed. 'l tsaJ uKhh `t�k nC u kgU[r'Z do< Vt�ll ')v d Gn' � 11 3 d� 1� t e '0r97a f park annenibes. l Mill' tk he 13101 do that u"'Athh the Site flan that`' , , -a a , c-urren lyr komrking from and vj6 can do c,,n eafir ec9tto defrz7.m>`nhie-' that frorin theif l g k'a.6 as. 2. Tlvhie n, d issue is one of de fignu. Nori ally neighborroa'I padk deign is done-, bythe p lfkts plann In `� 9 of the it �engineers relvia- an asals the plans. s � � v P9 k psi tifva�f1t i�'�H ks 1 i('��(� P 'shr,f Y4Y> 6�lih�� b );y iv � vai c � �.I G"'��'9�< � sd's'" k'nkl � „xi� � �� ,��� b:fne design This 0s of a probna;�;, due to the "cu rqjn'hl� wofa oad but agar. PhlIllps mind he can 'waNt. We Will chheck %pr ,;'d d rhos e It they can works w6th us to K 'bn"npWta,, the design and do the and inspections n lR3ir. � �� tinulnp� _ s hhe Aa'+t-r� A gener s-i c: retractor . l has ve no net �l �:e�a�t -,fps a ���it men fi�i� wa utno lnld �? ��! uf�i9tkad ��ty6. S utnkln this 1 �6u Ideas? r in : hh ' ,;� rune the t ri {rl ' G t rt - GAMft 4 Dean-abs Mir. Phillips Indicated thal, a ksfie-r of credit couid hse- obtained W gLuia"�'':inn e* %'h e cif' hh P'.�,u 3. 1M,r. PIn, I�I ups r is corhsbif-4cted a se01as, r61 o nds: on oche �a� aill�,sr p rk are free are flkked by a was I I . a h a ^ a t s 3WI l f00 CdC la ted, thy, a pump fri a fa one ` nW to another. 1 ��/'anhially th is "offl8ll ba orne park Propefly although I do not kr bov w, en. Do any of jpou lknatfi w hen Nhnls r,MM be? Steve and l had talkedr+ �o Mir. Phhillipe i� out the n o?1r int�an n ce of the purnipskote-mg the (responsibility of the lhornemo-fists asewcna-i'lorn but there- Is r %othaang fin u rrd Ki a�;o1 t`a'hi ""4h^ Phillip is !!A oremied in this det'all { wing �,,vorlm d ou'L l am , otrhoer n d aboul the fOutures f na n'itenarnce ej this area as it is at the entrance of the development and the n eight 5`1" �a'�lll axpec': a high ls>ve", of cams.Dc)ea ElevelojYment s Ll ill yes Nee,�1ve mxyn t"vp 9 or agrinsetalen`nt Auvoith Caa*legate that car), be PnoadUcedito) include the mWntanancs of the pumps? CC-. &aavy, Steve; Brown, Glenn; 1ail Gaya 6i ,` George, Bridd.Sslew9 J'amirnersor 9 jessice Mayor City Council Lynn McIlhaney James Massey Mayor Pro Tempore Of Ron Silvia Larry Mariott Winnie Garner City Manager Dennis Maloney Thomas E. Brymer COLLEGEi Anne Hazen Agenda College Station City Council, Parks and Recreation Board, Planning and Zoning Commission, Cemetery Committee, Joint Relief Funding Review Committee, CS Business Development Corporation, Construction Board of Adjustments and Appeals, Library Committee, Facade Improvement Committee, Wolf Pen Creek Design Review Board, Zoning Board of Adjustments, Historic Preservation Committee Citizen Advisory Board Orientation Monday, July 30, 2001 at 6:30 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Overview from Elected and Appointed Officials regarding role of committee members, city's strategic plan, staff relations with committees, meeting procedures and legislative matters. 2. Review by Department Directors and Staff Liaisons on board responsibilities, staff relations, and reporting procedures. 3. Oath of Office to newly appointed officers. 4. Adjourn. City Manager Thomas E. Brymer I certify that this agenda was posted on the bulletin board at the Municipal Building, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas on July 27, 2001 at 10:00 a.m. City Secretary Connie Hooks This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Internet website http://www.ci.college-station.tx.us, Cable Access Channel 19 and The Eagle. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION I cl to, CoHege Station City Cound City of College Station Strategic Plan 2001-2002 Table of Contents Summary by Vision Statement ......................................................................... 4 VisionStatement #1 ......................................................................................... 8 Customer -Focused City Services VisionStatement #2 ......................................................................................... 18 Safe, Secure, and Healthy Environment VisionStatement #3 ......................................................................................... 26 Clean Environment that Enhances and Protects the Quality of Life VisionStatement #4 ......................................................................................... 31 Cultural Arts and Recreational Opportunities VisionStatement #5 ......................................................................................... 40 Participate and Contribute to the Well-being of our Community VisionStatement #6 ......................................................................................... 44 Easily Travel To, Within, and From the Community VisionStatement #7 ......................................................................................... 49 Strong and Diverse Economic Environment VisionStatement #8 .................................................................................. ...... 56 Well -Planned Neighborhoods Strategic Plan Resources .................................................... ............................ 59 01, 2001 Strategies By Vision Statement Vision Overall Priority Priority Score #1 Customer Focused City Services 1 1 5.57 To ensure the stability of our primary revenue sources, we will focus on protecting and optimizing our revenue streams. 2 2 5.14 To make the best use of our resources we will continually participate in intergovernmental cooperation. To provide excellent customer service to the development community, we will facilitate communication and be consistent in 3 13 4.14 the application of development policies. 41 16 4.00 To attract and retain professional and com etent employees, we will create a motivating work environment. *To provide sufficient and reasonably price power to our customers, we will seek to remain viable in a competitive 4 16 44.00 environment. 6 24 3.66 To ensure excellent customer service, we will provide appropriate facilities,training, and technology. #2 Safe, Secure and healthy Environment 1 6 4.29 To protect property and life, we will provide adequate fire and ems protection to all College Station citizens. 2 16 4.00 To plan for College Station's infrastructure needs, we will review annexation policy and options. 2 16 4.00 To increase the safetand security of our streets, we will take action to promote �ubliic safety. To contribute to brae ling the cycle of poverty and providing interrvenNon for fame ies in crisis, we will encourage holistic, 4 32 3.29 multi -agency social services. 5 37 3.00 To protect the environment and our residents, we will enhance explore composting, recycling, and other disposal capabilities #3 Clean Environment that Enhances and Protects the Quality of [fife. 1 6 4.29 To maintain the quality of our neighborhoods, we will strengthen code enforcement in residential areas. 2 246 3.96 To protect urban open space that provides recreation and mobility opportunities, we will implement a greenways system. 2 24 3.66 To protect the environment, we will endeavor to maintain storm water quality. 4 29 3.43 To protect the environment, we will endeavor to maintain air duality. Cultural Arts and Recreational Opportunities '1 3 41.66 To enhance cultural opportunities, we will work to develop a performing and visual arts center in College Station. 2 6 41.29 To improve the quality of our parks system, we will implement parks maintenance standards. 3 18 41.00 To provide recreational opportunities to all residents, we will provide lntergenerational park facilities. 4 27 3.71 To plan for community growth, we will maintain comprehensive parks planning processes and documentation. 5 26 3.57 To meet the needs of College Station citizens, we will develop comprehensive leisure programs. 6 29 3.463 To enhance cultural opportunities, we will expand our existing public art program. 7 32 3.29 To provide multi -use pedestrian recreation, we will connect arks facilities through .9 reenways and other opportunities. to improve parks planning, we will increase communication Between the City Council, parks Advisory Board, and the 8 35 3.14 Planning and Zoning Commission. 2001 Strategies By Vision Statement Vision Overall Priority Priority Score 5 participate and Contribute to the Well Being of our Community. 1 32 13.29 ITo facilitate citizen participation, we will pursue methods of civic Involvement. 2 1 35 3.14 To increase communication and citizen involvement, we will facilitate neighborhood association development. #6 Travel to, within and from the community. 1 13 4.14 To facilitate travel to, from, and within the community, we will maintain a current thoroughfare plan. 1 13 4.14 To provide for future transportation needs, we will participate in regional and intermodal transportation planning. 3 18 4.00 ITo improve our "bike/pedestrian friendliness," we will construct and maintain bikelpedestrian infrastructure. 4 29 3.43 To improve rider convenience, reliability, and accessibalty for citizens, we will improve the public transit system. #i Contribute to and Benefit From living in a Strong and Diverse Economic Environment. 2 3 4.86 To increase the diversity of our economy, we will be proactively involved in a regional approach to airport/air transportation. 2 3 4.86 To maintain and grow our sales tape base, we mill proactively recruit retail businesses. 1 8 4.29 To provide adequate economic opportunity for our citizens, we will promote economic development. 4 13 4.14 To enhance College Station's tourism economy, we will evaluate policies directing the growth of this industry. #8 Live in Weli Planned and Maintained Neighborhoods Suited to Community Interests and lifestyles. 1 3 4.86 To prevent residential decline and improve neighborhoods, we will create effective development policies. To ensure durable infrastructure that meets the community's needs, we will examine and improve our infrastructure 2 7 4.43 construction standards. 3 8 4.29 To ensure well planned neighborhoods, we will maintain and improve our Comprehensive Plan and development policies. To sustain the economic viability of all areas of College Station, we will develop a multi -year infrastructure rehabilitation 4 13 4.14 plan. Overall Strategy Nanking Vision Overall Priority Priority Score 1 5.57 To erasure the stability of our primary revenue sources, we will focus on protecting and optimizing our revenue streams. 2 5.144 To make the best use of our resources we will continually participate in intergovernmental cooperation. 3 4.36 To enhance cultural opportunities, we will work to develop a performing and visual arts center in College Station. 3 4.86 To increase the diversity of our economy, we will be proactively involved in a regional approach to airport/air transportation. 3 4.86 To maintain and grow our sales tax base, we will proactively recruit retail businesses. 3 4.86 To prevent residential decline and improve neighborhoods, we will create effective development policies. 'to ensure durable infrastructure that meets the community's needs, we will examine and improve our infrastructure 7 4.43 construction standards. 3 44.29 To protect property and life, we will provide adequate fire and emus protection to all College Station citizens. 8 4.29 To maintain the quality of our neighborhoods, we will strengthen code enforcement in residential areas. 8 44.29 To improve the quality of our parks system, we will implement parks maintenance standards. a 4.29 To provide adequate economic opportunity for our citizens, we will promote economic development. 8 4.29 To ensure well planned neighborhoods, we will maintain and improve our Comprehensive Flan and development policies. To provide excellent customer service to the development community, we will facilitate communication and be consistent in 13 44.14 the application of development policies. 13 44.14 To facilitate travel to, from, and within the community, we will maintain a current thoroughfare plan. 13 4.14 ITo provide for future transportation needs, we will participate in regional and intermuodal transportation planning. I 13 4.14 To enhance College Station's tourism econom , we will evaluate policies directing the growth of this indust ITo sustain the economic viability of all areas o College Station, we will develop a rnuQtsmyear infrastructure rehabilitation 13 4.14 plan. 18 4.00 To attract and retain professional and com etent employees, we will create a motivating work environment. ITo provide sufficient and reasonably price power to our customers, we will seek to remain viable in a competitive 13 4.00 environment, 18 4.00 To plan for College Station's infrastructure needs, we will review annexation policy and options. Is 4.00 To increase the safety and security of our streets, we will take action to promote public safety. i 18 4.00 To provide recreational opportunities to all residents, we will provide intergenerational park facilities. 18 44.00 To improve our "bikelpedestrian friendliness," we will construct and maintain bike/pedestrian infrastructure. 241 3.86 To ensure excellent customer service, we will provide appropriate facilities,training, and technology. j 244 3.86 To protect urban opera space that provides recreation and mobility opportunities, we w li implement a greenways system. 24 3.86 To protect the environment, we will endeavor to maintain storm water quality, 27 3.71 To plan for community growth, we will maintain comprehensive parks planning processes and documentation. 23 3.57 To meet the needs of College Station citizens, we will develop comprehensive leisure programs. 29 3.43 To protect the environment, we will endeavor to maintain air quality. 1 29 3.43 ITo enhance cultural opportunities, we will expand our existing public art program. Overall Strategy Ranking Vision Overall Priority Priority Score 29 3.43 To improve rider convenience, reliability, and accessibilty for Citizens, we will improve the public transit system. To contribute to breaking the cycle of poverty and providing intervention for families in crisis, we will encourage holistic, 32 3.29 multi -agency social services, 32 3.29 To provide multi -use pedestrian recreation, we will connect parks facilities through greenways and other opportunities. i 32 3.29 To facilitate citizeng� articipation, we will pursue methods of civic involvement. to improve parks panning, we will increase communication between the City Council, parks Advisory Board, and the 35 114 planning and Zoning Commission, J 35 3.14 To increase communication and cltizen involvement, we will facilitate neighborhood association development. N 37 3.00 To protect the environment and our residents, we will enhance explore composting, recycling, and other disposal capabilities Mission Statement On behalf of the citizens of College Station, a unique community and home of Texas A&M University, the City Council will promote the safety, health and general well-being of the community within the bounds of fiscal responsibility while preserving and advancing the quality of life resulting in exceptional civic pride. Vision #1 Customer Focused Services Strategies 1. Primary revenue stability - 3 Implementation Plans - Resources: New :$0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 2. Intergovernmental Cooperation - 1 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 3. Development Policies - 3 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 4. Motivating Work Environment - 5 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $2,520,848 Existing: $36,000 Total: $2,556,848 5. Competitive Electric Environment - 1 Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $100,000 Existing: $100,000 Total: $200,000 6. Ensure Excellent Customer Service - 4 Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $61,417 Existing: $1,802,000 Total: $1,863,417 Vision #2 Safe, Secure and Healthy Environment Strategies 1. Protection of Life and Property - 3 Implementation Plans - Resources: New:$0 Existing: $120,000 Total: $120,000 2. Annexation - 1 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $20,000 Existing: Existing Staff Total: $20,000 3. Public Safety - 6 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $585,104 Existing: $31,490 Total: $616,594 4.Poverty/ Social Services - 1 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 5. Protect Environment - 1 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff Vision #3 Clean Environment that Enhances and Protects Quality of Life Strategies 1. Neighborhood Quality b Code Enforcement - 2 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing :$61,316 Total: $61,316 2. Greenways - 2 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 3. Protect Environment - Storm Water Quality - 1 Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 4. Protect Environment - Air Quality - 2 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $30,000 Existing: Existing staff Total: $30,000 Vision ##4 Cultural Arts and Recreational Opportunities Strategies 1. Performing Arts Center - 1 Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $20,465,000 Existing: Existing staff Total: $20,465,000 2. Parks Maintenance Standards - 1 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 3. Intergenerational Parks - 1 Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 4. Comprehensive Parks Planning - 4 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 5. Comprehensive Leisure Programs - 2 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $5,000 Existing: Existing staff Total: $5,000 6. Enhance Cultural Opportunities Through Existing Art Program - 2 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $50,000 Existing: $20,400 Total: $70,400 7. Connect Greenways - 2 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $5,258,000 Existing: $3,677,000 Total: $8,935,000 8. Improve Communication between Boards - 1 Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff Mission Statement On behalf of the citizens of College Station, a unique community and home of Texas A&M University, the City Council will promote the safety, health and general well-being of the community within the bounds of fiscal responsibility while preserving and advancing the quality of life resulting in exceptional civic pride. Vision #6 Participate and Contribute to the Well Being of Our Community Strategies 1. Facilitate Civic and Citizen Involvement - 4 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: $8,150 Total: $8,160 2. Increase Communication and Citizen Involvement - I Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $0 Existing: $10,000 Total: $10,000 Vision #6 Easily Travel To, Within and From the Community Strategies 1. Travel to, Within, and From the Community - 3 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $9,000,000 Existing: $9,000,000 Total: $18,000,000 2. Future Transportation - 1 Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 3. Bike(Pedestrian Friendliness - 4 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: $500,000 Total: $500,000 4. Improve Public Transit System - 1 Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $0 Existing: $240,000 Total: $240,000f Vision #7 Strong and Diverse Economic Environment Strategies 1. Regional Approach to Air/ Airport Transportation - I Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 2. Protective Retail Recruiting - 2 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $40,000 Existing: Existing staff Total: $40,000 3. Promote Economic Development - 4 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $5,965,000 Existing: $1,210,000 Total: $7,175,000 4. Enhance Tourism Economy and Industry Growth - 3 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $5,800,000 Existing:$6,600,000 Total: $12,400,000 Vision #8 Well Planned Neighborhoods Strategies 1. Prevent Residential Decline/ Create Dev. Policies - 4 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $1,123,325 Existing: Existing staff Total: $1,123,325 2. Improve Construction Standards/Infrastructure - I Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 3. Ensure Well Planned Neighborhoods/Standards - 2 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $62,500 Existing: Existing staff Total: $62,500 5 F Vision Statement #1 As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from and have access to the highest quality of customer focused city services at reasonable cost. Strategy #1 To ensure the stability of our primary revenue sources, we will focus on protecting and optimizing our revenue streams Implementation Plans a. Development of a Legislative Plan prior to the 2003 session. b. Review of Fiscal and Budgetary policies and franchise agreements c. Sell City property with no current or potential value for municipal purposes. `Strategy #2 To make the best use of our resources, we will continually participate in intergovernmental cooperation Implementation Plans a. Develop a process for creating an annual work plan for establishing Intergovernmental priorities and then utilize this process to develop said plan for FV02. Strategy #3 To provide excellent customer service to the development community, we will facilitate communication and be consistent in the application of development policies Implementation Plans a. Identify customer service problems related to development applicants and customers. b. Develop communication programs with development community. c. Review current system and formats for predevelopment contacts for inconsistencies. Strategy #•4 To attract and retain professional and competent employees, we will create a motivating work environment. Implementation Plans a. Monitor compensation plan to ensure competitive pay b. Pursue competitive, cost effective, high quality health insurance benefits c. Promote personal and professional employee development d. Monitor and identify trends in employee retention rate e. Promote employee recognition through identifying and developing meaningful recognition programs. Strategy #5 To provide sufficient and reasonably priced power to our customers, we will seek to remain viable in a competitive environment. Implementation Plans a. Implement deregulation strategic plan 6 ViSi r; St,ttis ��� i �� �t,.=.� �, �hr—c•7c;tss-r•! L i.y Seris-�s Strategy #6 To ensure excellent customer service, we will provide appropriate facilities, training, and technology [Irnpllementation Plans a. Facilities Master Plan. b. Develop a multi -year e-government/telecommunication plan that balances personal customer service with technology. c. Complete City Center Plan (Phase 1). d. New 5 year CIP. Vision Statement #1 Customer Focused City Services As a result of our efforts, citizens will benefit from and have access to the highest quality of customer -focused city services at reasonable cost. ® Customer service ® Value for cost ® Effectiveness/efficiency ® Convenience, accessibility ® Professional, competent staff ® Communication Plan Leader: Charles Cryan, Fiscal Services Director Summary: Development of a legislative plan prior to the 2003 legislative session. Prepare and coordinate a plan to address issues that need to be before the legislature or issues that may be before the legislature and may adversely affect the City of College Station. Policy Change: In the past the city has reviewed legislative actions at the state and federal level primarily responding to issues identified by the Texas Municipal League or National League of Cities. It is likely that the city may be more effective if it more closely monitors pending legislative initiatives and pro -actively seeks to address legislative issues with council resolutions. Resources: Primary resources necessary will be staff time to review anticipated or actual legislation and to review whether the city desires to enter into an agreement with a lobbyist on its behalf. Key Milestones: January 2002 Review with council legislation that the city supported and opposed during the 2001 legislative. December 2002 Identify key legislative initiatives that the city wishes to support or anticipated legislative actions that may not be in the best interest of College Station and that should be opposed. Present to the city council a plan to support or oppose various legislative actions in the upcoming legislative session. May 2003 Monitor legislative actions and present resolutions to the council supporting or opposing legislation based on the council°s legislative priorities. June 2003 Review legislation to determine whether College Station priorities were impacted. 8 t t' b _, Redrew of fiscal and $ticigetaey Pplacfes antl'�rar�ch►se ers�r�is. �....... Plan Leader: Charles Cryan, Fiscal Services Director Summary: Conduct a comprehensive review of the City of College Station fiscal and budgetary policies. Recommend changes to the fiscal and budgetary policies that reflect Council direction to maximize the stability of the City's primary revenue streams. Implement any changes to the policies approved by the City Council. Also, conduct a review of the City's franchise agreements and a strategy for the development of new franchise agreements. Policy Change: The fiscal and budgetary policies may change based on the direction given by the City Council. Resources: Existing staff time will be used to review and revise the policies and the franchise agreements. Outside assistance on the renewal of the cable franchise will be needed. Key Milestones: August 2001 Complete the preliminary review of Fiscal and Budgetary Policies with City Council. October 2001 Implement changes to the Fiscal and Budgetary Policies as the FY 02 budget is approved. January 2002 Present BTU franchise agreement to Council March 2002 Complete review of all possible franchising avenues. May 2002 Complete comprehensive review of Fiscal and Budgetary Policies as part of the FY 03 Budget. December 2002 Begin franchise negotiations on TXU Gas franchise December 2003 Begin franchise negotiations on Cox Cable franchise Plan Leader: Glenn Brown, Assistant City Manager Summary: In an effort to examine all possible revenue sources for the City of College Station, develop a systematic program to identify city owned land; and determine its present value to the City. Criteria will have to be developed to evaluate property as to its current or potential usefulness to the City. Any property determined to be of minimal importance will be considered for selling through the appropriate legal processes. It is envisioned that once the process is established, and criteria for evaluation developed this process will be initiated every third year. Policy Change: Traditionally the City has only purchased property that it has a specific need for, and has held property for potential future use. With the process described above the City will take the position that all property is subject to a review process, and will be sold if it has no current or potential value for municipal purposes. Resources: Existing staff Key Milestones: November 2001 Receive policy direction from City Council on municipally owned land. January 2002 Complete GIS comprehensive listing of all City owned property, both in narrative form and maps. October 2002 Completion of Evaluation of all City property. 9 Vision Statement #1 Customer Focused City Services November 2002 Council Authorization to sell surplus property August 2003 Council Award of Bid and completion of land transaction. Implementation Plans a. Develop a process for creating an annual work plan for establishing Intergovernmental priorities and then utilize this process to develop said plan for FY 02 Plan Leader: Tom Brymer, City Manager Summary: Development of an annual work plan for establishing City Council priorities for pursuing specific inter -governmental cooperative ventures. Policy change: Development of written annual work plan for Council inter -governmental cooperative projects. Resources: Existing staff Key Milestones: July 2001 Staff development of draft FY02 inter -governmental work plan and review of this plan with Council Legislative Affairs Committee. August 2001 Council direction regarding proposed inter -governmental work plan and used of it at joint Council retreat with Bryan Council. September 2001 June 2002 Pursue initiatives identified as priorities in the plan. July 2002 Begin same cycle for review/revision of FY03 inter -governmental work plan. Implementation Plans c. Review current system and formats for'predevelopm"ent meetings a Plan Leader: Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services Summary: This is a short-term plan intended to improve and maintain communications between the development community and the various City departments that interface with the development process. This plan is intended to identify the communications needs of the development community as a customer group and develop information products and services to meet those needs. Policy change: There is no policy change required. Resources: This plan will be implemented with current resources. Improved communications practices and products may require additional resources at a future date. Key Milestones: H r. •` .? � '�' a� a �r �„ "` + y�,y '' r� +r,M �--"1�"Ks' . �'# � �:� � � 1st � .+'j � tm�. � �I' ,, ja• � �� �ill��� r. " `s v a I r . e, rrz r� t _ .. -.. r ?: -. a .- .«a .. .. •.. : -. � ..�:'',-' .}- 5, 3 :+[` 1 ' l t. x �t •:1 r r' - ;uY �y s� « J. Y' 9�_ Y - + ka _ x 4 #.t fi• x '.0 Lx� rt } 1. X t, - - c a'' _ Y 71 z:i• ,P i Ri , •z7. S is S T Y. _ s4• _ r`Fv :4 �. L.t r� r r , ' :th,r'."- '•n;+ s .. .t. .. .. , i::5;,..• ,..r-> erY. . - _ t .. , '. ,. ...:+, ,. E. �.. -r a Y" --. ::., _ tX - r "�' °:fie• ,t t, V p• a ` rr: ,L. a r _�.n.- rti":°<';•: , e. i g ,k am' i?- , g ff Y h*' s i <k.xt d mma�rtrt i _ :«Y l pp , ,Sat x rti a .t , ,< .:,;, .- _.,, - <.' �,n...:.,'; t•'' Y t .-awl o- U. .- " .. �.-. ._. -.� .. a, ,. t•. r-,- n.}".. .. .8. t L. Y A -A , 3• - 4 . y fr. rd ' M la tl » YF' r .', „ram � `�� ..�.. : ;< 7 ,p... ,,,1 ',.` r, 3+, w•'_:' ... .v .'-'i: .,':in, -, .. 's' r.:'i- ''..1`i ,' ,.i fc ,(••-t �?s,..., .'?"'!.':♦ :7 .'f{, vb+" - >I'.c,.4' - - yy� ' i • t«' y y: r �t .:fir• - S�- 3 ,,r.�r,:,.oy •. :�Y.r '7 ter` :'6+'+--• .k, '.c �' •rti' e- r , %., ma's K- :'"•.x z .. .':. :, ^.:"'.,..�^.:<+ , ..,, i=•r ,s.:•<;,a" ' � -3};' iy, "-t. ..-,t,-. 9 =;„ net ^ , �� f' i .F v� •� -Y li i r, ,'d y • v •„n , ^t : r. �� r �r. ; . _ wrt,, t e3 sn•! 1. ".�' - s; . 55 r , N`> a: - •.r aeLL i"., :;.x,4. t, .::::+' '.':>„:".''.•i� : av�F»:f >•r . v :s• r'maF a'7x5 k S v,kr t °*1 ,. , r �r , x �S'a`-� RAN:are,. .;rti K,. }!.r„, .+, < , : w. E } x "R t, .J! fr%,q 'a F.. 1 :.:j ' t, :15• ''''}:, . .,fir'^'.t.iu:• � ..� , .s .y'"i . ntEi *Sad aY ✓ r, pg. Yry, ar . .. t . 1 'e - '-r �Y { .A If0. M f, e • F.w v y „ a.' t s i S "Is ,s 1 L!, . , _. , , -. _- - .. - -«... ._. .. ., .: ... e. erY.,,- ta.r ,:.it •, .x'r '$ w:k #v^%,'�. v.i . .. Y` 'itt f' " •.,n .. fit, �, :i�'" t r Nx -x"•�• tea': r _ •' � � -. -: ,- • !" •" •:'- .- i"�2'i?: - � ,,r:^'` ,,I' ..r r XI *� t K a' , _ - _ - � 34 :3¢z�' s',+.. ,{, '-o`er`.. •.P•.k'''+'' „'ti!':... t ', . • i : :'vim' ;t. { ,�'.,;�'<,�,,<x,.,• : der �. � J a -r, - ",.•;,.,,., ...':• , ..' .) .,,fix`^ $ ..- __ .- - � . �i_.�.._ ,.rt+•^� r ,. .. ,.,Y .# r i . i.• r { .rz .d, `3. :4. t-. '3r:. » Wr r d� ems•: d t' mood :Y. '�'zitl, 1 r .,✓ _ -.. .. ,. .,. .,, a t.• s; -.:!:• `i{`.:::• t* �C a N' .0 }`« gam` y f• {. �,,.yJ'a %- r - ';t:. , �'- fit' it 9 •_F '�,� • y4;�, „rt-. rr7l,+« ":.� ht � 3� p., Zf' :.r i.•, e � - ", � 't i jN: 1 Z. _„- t„ y _'� .-. .; .. -, ._ : ' �: . , .' _.) is i =. , >.. -..: >'•x ��~aa..,, �,; ie#'A.,,i" :`) '-.if�'f} ¢ «'�<L>. tiry J* Y R 4 ff,, "}'_✓, . 'etc'" �i- .-:.... ,, .rr - .. J" '.�:<e -s 'fix 1. _..-a - , mod' -� v k: rh -, � r -_, ...._.. 5 „v ,,...,v, ,"„ . 5,.. .. _, ,'{>,,w _.t - _ , yt '`�'itsk :.T ' „ r} ,J zz me . „ {{ s a3 .7 2<' 'i`rt �l `.•'Ci, :,y.r', -t., .. f'.kY fi, f .1� ff' wady-,?:'.^a,d,spx ,r, f Lr•* .kf - n •r' ,r • f. <r. n, -,:.. ... ' ..- -•: ",.: :- .. .., ,., =w..:, .,, .n- «r}»i r>'•- .. -'�' M §- }`�. ,7""' a:,L•,ti.e -a ... .... ... ..... .... , ., r.. ... .. •'a t. Axe.., � x , t n , f Y n ..tV' , «.':, t-r•e-d .. . t. a' ... .-- ,. 1 P r _� r +. f ,� _ �x 4zti°' �„ •�+,� t�' 'r'N> • ' - h �{ i�i' �' _ " < - it ^ � fN r< x - ti-z, i- ,i n 'i rt- S t.• rT , t• ..; r t �r. �i. ,. _. , ._ .., ,.;.,'_ _ - - - ..-. .-. .,. �~ -.... .� I--.-....-». .:s....: r, _ - .`ads:-„ `'� �'6• - x z. ., « ,. ,.., � ,. , - . k -- _ : - .. . t Y , .. s"t »' , M ,.... _ .,. - _.a`. • ... ..,...., „ . .,w _ S!.., %�'' _ _ :e', .;`�! -�'�;� `,�, ',>'r.. ii = �!�4"+�;, . .s ,. `wz � z ,5�` .:,Cr,A>"' ''s: ` ;,'> ; r i ,gib 4. f 3.r S �. .y .d s: { } f . / L � .i vP}• [ .-� x y s• , t . d„ e _ . �: •;;. .. - .n" :'; .- -e .: _ - .., : 'N9^ryr,r,. '° � •;.F - te'.'Y . NON ..-.,,::� .::;'i ^ , �... .6.., a, 7'.°. `�:' «..., ,f.•i< .l�J .z14"�i"'s {, ,1 .,,.,,;� - ;�, ,,,,_.,--n ^•: ='aY"- _ Fir" • .� I» � = ��.�: t . •,: • .,,,�:;-. � .. _.,. ..:' - . . ,. ,.. •,.. ,., , . t ...':,. ,? ,f "ar.. i{,•, -- H`a'w' - ` wx,+�. ...�''rr. -7,. , q pt �'t.Y� - ._ , _ .. -... .. 7. ,..y ..s. /S, r �. t,P ., : .,. 'E' : a.+, ....,s.. ,' `•'i�li' :'• •`ii't '0'3:[4 '"V-T.�+•.r. •---. r ,t'! .. . , .. - � � ... FWr ., _ .. .. .,. ,. ,y, .. ...�. -a e.,„ &' r j:' 'ajar' _ may..+. 7.wi;,.»��.".�,.", ..'i, . !" "fF 3.'= :h. k' , Yam+ : ".l: • � ,� cS . i? �51� vow MOM .. .:' ._ fit' - - .- .. � ',. .-�' - •' j - -'�', a Fgo Q • - - - - - - - - - - ""'�C.cv-.:,�v+.rµ»»3 m-r � -_--� : ,Y woo _ & k ' ' Its mmm pop h_ c..� _ _ _. _ .'.' _ _ _ � � - U ;` 15c�. �` %"�y - -W, 4a. 'Im %eA", - t."'ziM i tit A4 tt, U. )16 M.- j 10 17 A. V �' yx 'If S lit 4 V� 4� S i:;,t� IN j "A it, a4 Tw�--t, IN "��V Aii' �0" --ty. 04 -t lie k Ali , Z - t"Y' A� 1p V W f U, 1`4 zo� k tt", -N - Nit og� 0 1 f'J An I-; x o, t S�l ff:,- j rd Z r -M if�;,t Z", '-I' t T, -;f It it 1* n -11.1 tl"�,t, -I� �n -t-�& t;,k, MA'! "W, ix A� Z' m t1w tgfWr q, RPW-i -.0 tM. "M- -ve r, 4i- I Mal Vf `16 2� D"': A 'A KL 4%, -t� iYA i3f, -N PN'.it.4 4 _ �TRQ� 4�, , ;4 5 �;4 Aw -0. ri So 'U, ji, , 4v fit PR --�j V zt ji- ML vj in. "o- % t gr A K� W .5-A "V -, `�A. gi,� : " N, "'W Ui 4. 1. WW"J": E MAN .'N �H�, t" Y k, 'g 10 'i'n,% �Wl 40 , t t XNA ' " ;R�I!X;1-1 - - , , , +' I Ip 114 Al 't ��l U mill g J - , - !,;�- - - - " t. - 1. � � -1, - - 4- *1- g K 7p 2� MIN f: R Q w, , it Jj -PL��. -i tf -'+z'?:±JA'; ;' s"i5"-,pz.,,,.-�y •...r-.,-:,.,�,e-.,-• i-�}'�°-n.. ' _ i : - _ � J - - ) - '+- %,fir ,r� Y. y , A` y{ Y imass, r, Y }} .t f i' , a � seem +.Ft s� h r' --x , K d• A' K^ tT ^: t+ y :„ 'Se s _ C� h { f, } f• h , 'I z -g# :'i, �'ze. �4'S':-" _ 'Ci-..L¢nr _ . _Sdi-,'":'✓,s•':::.. - _ - 3: , Y "Lis _ .',. t, "'a�..•. "'. ryo- ' - _ _ � F� i ,:' d' u _ ., ...--. � - -. .. _ .. ... ,K': 1 r „ ..as'• ..-. :. ,. ,: " ,.i7s1K,a � :,tt:_-^i. _ N.1r,. y,` t5 Wr'" tit t+rh•.3'{ , „ '-. _ $ .' ..-. _.,- -. .li:, n , � .a .r, - _ ., i^ ._. .,., ,,,, 4.° q-J :c .'t,C ✓•:P{,'�-'^zs r - - � ..'?.x i" . .;,:- . F:: •di'= _ f _ - �p - 1^ `Y N:4::ix, �^::+'�'iw'ttn'`+ .y a f a' r �Y - .. -- - ... ,-- •..-...,,,.-. .- ,.,,_ .. ;aa„,':.:r-K'� «.+�`.,.. r,-7 `� - _ _ 'tom:: ., x,°a''%, iv- ':,ryh-. x4 G X . Ys« 4 - r"s r' :s }t, 'i pia v' , ,7.t.. - _ .. .- . - .. .. .. n�''-:§..:.::�, � = .:x.. ,.;-.. •. :a+-� _ ,Yes `r:� ^' '�4 :'.a•, "F -i� �l a§a r•t ,t r <y s Mr y J - ! won _ • z4 5.0 X 't� _ fTyk ,, x e•� 1 r CE > ) mfig F - •Yh n. . "`> Vie' ^ iw. Mtn r'.u'i` , tN`¢ . ?,?.r"+' 'at," • ., i• ...y, •,�„' '-...:i,'�`5•, c L:.-,ad a )' _ �,+'+: •i'3',.. ..tt�� .r'�5- ct:::" _ _ �'w".a. �• t,��,t �i'>r,,`:pa'..i':,v M'.'t�-s':l sf1: ;�+; '«'..3 ,a, .a2T)•xx _ C'4w.�"4 - „3 :fi"' ., _ _ � - :cw 3l, .a 1:'• - ..„a,S .'•� -'' r. '� -tr, ..: m '";:"-ta' - :'«dJv"*'•.'.<. - ,. t. z.� :it::et. � ..3NMI' n'£.L x rr {, „ i >w 3- •f.-t {`" ,s 2°. `CS'"a ';;^,.'f,'{r" ytij;,;,'i'�'�" as +''..- :.1 , - voy out•:F', ,^'., +i g-d^. ,dry ":i.i..i �R .$ - _ � _ _- -t� ,t� - , ,ri;, M ,- , .. _ ,. .. ,:. .. -.. .:: - , - `Zaa ,-.-,i.. <«+ +_s .,., . x- 5-i� { - "'if „:""�:,:✓ v.Is3;,NX' :,;i,: - z IU PAN lot .,ram.,-: , . •sr_,.� _"d; ,.-a -„�"; ,..«,ka . W< _- z. t _ �,�� "ry +}v i -Y.� ''.Y- s+r r > p y' x 3� r� r �. >f •T:: Y. ari All i.p ' S, h Z } ix. $ s}• . 9A owl N r. r" -,.r- x:3 § t ;-`'S�.'�':%°='ijJ'$:?s .,fir,§�:•.,.- ,i:�:c.,:'p=;':;,: �c b J, xY �3 --I 'L. i. ^c,' 3i-. .'L Y L •t it xa+,: I": '' <-_ -:.. '..:.>`. tnvh >`, •:,yi �. •�',':i i�{"3"Zw,,, :'i.^. - r ..}. , .. .). . «., .. - _-. • ., .: .' ... ems, , ... .:r•'zrz. ...n. .., .r: .�_ �-. .,. ..-_. -.,, -,,,, :...- .-Ja�ea �.zna-... ,:. � .,.,-.. _ ','i'.a. t.':r - c, :ra z -taS .F}' Ttog' _ „rt'.`�",: t3'"'r". +.'i :-+✓'Y�+ i u.r $ r„ _ _ - ._ - :';�, ?�• ,i„"'' .asr'z•_".' fit, �,rT�"-S: T,.' 'i - - ; _ r r x. _ _ _ _ - ^`'+ii; - - s'• - '..a'�.`.',,. k:.,' �.�psrcYr� >.a:,v:;r :furwas - F , _ _ _ _ _ - - r.- - - ',s::t% - ,-• a .i,,.S . -,.3 i�, _54,- _ - _ _ .'k" - _ `,f e<na tw � ,°u^..:.. r.&?'.. .'.< �e"���v..,at3kur' .'%r""t 9. ..,.��"'�",�,•�'y,.,N;z: ;:r,^� - _ '. AW sit rr � - L x ° L - _ , - - - _ _ _ - ' _ sty '`xt,y� '',.£ „r t" _ a;•. ,>4 : s?3'r =z';", ;*�"',`''' - 'r -,� - - - _ - j, r . ! +t r, 3 nSt' i m !- 3 , _, .; ; n,;; �•ti . - '':s:,:. ". ':,'*- i- „" ,: ra ::PI,-s' a�^ e„=ti'S'�'':l,u._:...kRa;w.-:,: - - 0, - :`,ih::.' :,.{:,,? ` xy4Et'S`' `S ...C.,`: ;',�,1 `£'i:. >' i .r _-sts^, .iS?$.{ - f-'.; , �44�j0,,�v"'...1_",, , I,""1�I"M�- rRI'',�0 M,W r`_ �-f ..r;,.;*,•, •t'r':,'.;�,..: .{,. ,n3Yt: - ,^''sty-5, +rr',. .iS::aa,,:,,.:� _ - `, y. `x._,�sa,s3" •a?' fin.,. ,a„y,'''r.•" , t-.""}[ a ± - --7 I1'7cSN�' ,�., y Chi' - - - rL:. .:a.'#„ , -.".:t }.-a °'`" �t p:::,`` ;, Sri:,gt t� :;tt',-,�, ar,.l3:'„':.:a",, :,'� »>`* 5+�' i�t�,'r•,-` "ru. :{`.',. A. x. i,<,.7k ;r••" Y'at'r; t ��,s, � Y,. a'a .a„ ,, •.,tn ,�,:�..*i` tt." f caS'S, :a .,{t." .cc»;a�6 oil rr"',�"•<`a�;".-.."=�i'"r N:.r.ae'f .�c�.� ,.°5'.A If 'S' t•,y g'ar°i. `",r 4 3'' , W -a; : �`� v_,# -: e p,,;, ` %,f, :ta,^ 'V 5�. 45" - ''ii ::�*a .i. >: _3 .o ,�sstir=r')e.' €%�`-uriu ;?".ct�'i't _ is .,-t, ,+,''"s°';'`�TM' : cC+:, k�: $„ } rkt p,w.L-: i Cr%a:�' 7 #j �,P _ T 'Li ", i _ �v,'� v .. , _}£ _ _r -k Y .. ft9'%% �t'g'� tT 3 " `i,te 4s�3 1, r rt - - '� Oahu Q k-i{,tu. ,z�.k' 1 z _- MAN-1. 4"`�`W,.t* 'Ill, �: - - f --'".,^3M" '? -- - - '' .F ` -1% ' C- - S,t *,< µ? .$ . t _fi,fj, Y'#" S;yd='' :; - - - - - _-.a*u:`i' ^ >: --- ,'t2i'F Y. :;'.i;;'':i.,, <.s�+' vv'; i'^4^'t;t.•S• :7", , 2 - - - •:.d - r' : `1' ,. : ,U7A ,.;y4 ', '� �i',,A'i-DP:. 4 5 f,.>t: .}:t _.n;: >' f i -t5: `t 3 < "" -' - I �J - - - - �'t`:'''%"y}j 4psrw,.y,�, ,,R`• ^.3:1$ .¢Y L ',-�f•'�,,+'w'»{'i�A.r",Nw' >L _ ,,,,. f::;,:T:<`•4 - , v`��, "'l" aT_ xi . a:� .ai �'w. , 'S,�"/i'J :.tY i' 3,. KOX 144, .0 - - - M-r't r - x'ut`"s"••) .ur"' • At. '"x,f,`.�„wt''? it:'1? • Y' o..z.. - - - ,: t" - _ Wiz:,"w - ..s� _ _ , . „�' �' ".., .i:. . ,, .. 't�^.I ^ie ,wsr '�'{, .. ,. - - - _ ,_ :�'r"n.'k�sts r_>n - ':;;i""a .'J` - °`- - - -_�g. - i',y i4 `'ia;.,. r,as'':'.'as ',,,,`` ,, •`t+�',�„ x ' • - - - # _ -. - --- - - +us,�: -' - ._ .', ,may „ S ! .-01^•'lS':..kS ,_, •.'ic'S,.,V">'` '" " - - - .Z:.: `.,-: ' z:... , - a5n!a6dd4tL" .,"' XP.�, jf'N, c ' Sys 5 " 9:% a»c , i _ S, fQK4qj "I as S`- ._ - - _ _ rm- - ... - - - '?,.,Er `1^ , t �F:'"`.t•` �.r;33?' :,'' - .ate "•:• - - - -' 'a 'rvh{Y.^ d.... :`t 'o�, a, P' ^1:''' ':ram :'a";`... - _ sr: _ _ 'w•`b'��''. •; i,r, r ,'rY ..p , - ,d - - - .i�,ryg. <,Y' . ,� j i:, it*F: , :?''. .,rai+'' - _ �''1' _ - _ ��� — - - .- . - _ ., `1k'.•2 -"f, L .w a 'c? Ysk,�tiw '. .„'itiI ri, - <- -:a: - - ,:• . *=¢.-I ,.z`{ - y ,.n.}- :, ",4}�x- p% � s:,ts fia ;:� i"4.;;;. :� ,,:5.�z.,'iz' " '"',tu:r •v �,. � ;;'� ,;,:,,' - - - - - "el' - - syw,';'=" - - - - • i'',*"' • k c-t.'. :r ^.Y. =':., .Cq ^ :'.'t'. !i'vrs , - -, >�•, _'i, :i2'*" :rn,*,e ,:�a,,.<' ',.' .;_i4 - ',€. ,r7 .;—u"t,: ':;�.,,'�'�"„'��� ,,, f 'a»._`Jai,.4 _ - .r -;ice ::. •s"-., ro',:,+c `}z3."" ` .'•k3 . - ,+ - ;tr •+r',::'rL,,,..r ., 'fit .tuna t. . , ;_ : ... n:'.. r, = ` .. <.«: , . r� _ - { •�tt:.s. rr'`a�i ��' "�''�.1'.e^P s',: - - _ - - _ - T } x - `'- 'V , - 'x- ,,,,�, 7'2 x}`-fin . #a:,�',,s 's'i# r -i d- .r• ,. ,+ _0 3 iY - - q _ - - - _ _ -- _ N.�,� ; - _ 1 ti.. J_', •iay ,#5iti:Yk„' ` t-c2 _ y..- .. xK.:RAs„4tl+..- - s';.1L,,.-'^ _�44 •a�;•:; :'::�5'��"� ..iK�11 �ay y 1. -t>�3x T F a . M:. . _ 3 - ` _ " t•: - - - -i ; a "*` .,},,,"ter ,rn ''ti' `C a i ";. a. , n i,: ' a a`. R. ` 3`:^•'• . . a r r -. „7 . 3 a, xi11 '$ . i ra'- m� •,r s .' `x x •- P - - �' �. . sx'sr rwl. i''' "s _ - - _ � ., � t. ''3 .+� k .`9: X i., rc.a5': Y3" : c4 5 }.. a.{, 'J r :,rt,'. „^, :. _ �Y - 'r - - asysF`'�riR�:6itt ` ?i; ' f.-3, .yw - - - - :3S^n"1Y:ri'':' E.t: "k- i3 ) _,y :2 's - - - - - S - ,. ,::. - ,'ps,'-.l`f..' ,.is F 3' v- `',:Cd �^'. �i`•i .L - 9: _ 3. - _ A- --.', - v.'1- _ _ ..,,�nj_ .:t., �;A. "1,', 7' Y�,r. ti' 'i .d L`'--#"11�."^::i: ;.'�, r > k, :ice-%sG. y: mat .z, �,^F>..f;x '> .A /» ;,, 'f'+ � r a 4 i' ';1 _ :� ':�. 'f^t,' - » :- -,.ice* :r:" _ •n •_, _ _ _ r.. - - - ,k: _ `'rin.- . .ir"" `'".�. - i' d"2.?fL .. <....,s:%`' ' ��'-•'n ,1.'.- :.t - - _ - _ _ `'a �- -Lv^., ,i'<. #' `.ice t 6'c y u hh v,. �, r y , , 7 » ,, "^Hs, r^ .7�., 'i +;} ,.x. x : , s ,up s - %f �i0. •. .�'.. ; y: it % Yn, .ra F,i' t, n'':2.'e,�, : ,1' F!,,e'+' ; ^'2 • . I[ Fx' :,'': z •.�,,y { ,,xd � r> seRP '�` e�,� �,5+ .rL: ! 5 �,,,t xis., "1 :'>y 3 a t ���ra t p R.r 1 S w :2i .t.s �Y'+ a d +' L , g ..,r = § - - " r1' y�.RS .t _ - .. - _ .S-,- :,v'i 4 y' F 2',,'it"�=.-`s�. 1"-. _ :,a": y: }�11TI, 'a .:x: }.` y P.3 �z . p,�� %,ci f, -ti o 9 . t`i _. t,,,..,,, - - - - - - -. .. ,,..; ,%'1y';;': _ .%L. ,r.,'K' ,da " a• ki ?s'- .{;sre:,': f`x _ "h'�'. .. .,< _�": rr :.,'•e.' _ _ ;.K .. �',}:d*a t,,..,,..,.. '£=.'r: .,,.. g�- •r*+x,.x-. - rr , -r _ yam.. ..f;:,, ra; {df ...i-. q,,�'-,,-'+ U. --y a. X 3 it +•4 a fn .Y" �* :'.# - a A 'F' � � . rI, ,t i" «a. G� Y. Y r j $ j �z - d. v a Y .,. w . r' ''� Ri,i X. �iif. t �i _ F. . t � >� A t ii; - _ T n} F> - ' Fl ¢ t; Pam^ t. Y'. � �.'Mt. rv,f P.T.. l : RS n�. „3 {{ wr t �,jj U. 'iX� r�'�J." - Y T -0 -1 :7 :r ;, .,. o " _ _ .,,d ,f_{a w e f,,, ,..,, : , �,. s.,y :,. a,<., dn _ v �m a. t' b' t, q _ ��i, y , { ' '� » d, - S: M, yy _ - ..0 '�a" r.. (t, ` #y: by 1 ,s x6a ..r m i-., .1:: z a. . _: _ b I c LL$� ': x „ _-.. r - h,a , ':. - .,p' ,, z' - - , ...•.a+rk#, ., s}}, , z..a,:;v:. =i y'-'%%:.r ,•"l.- - 4 5>, #-"-1... _ :$?lki^,•-- - _ - e,7 'rid'ti`->,. ,:',,i,t;Tr ;$�.f:, ,c. ._ - -. - x', a -y :. � t ai - • {. fi ,_ ... „ , ,#>•`' ' Wit: � ,::�.,.-- >< '::. ;. . -,-_ - . .-- - _ - '�3-"inY'. '7'1:, m:t'r.`%ar;. ?.`i''''"a+..,. .. - ' `d'-'ti,y - ° .- ('S;' _ �". gip$,+., .>< ::.,:ss'.':;";:', i ta,: - _ - - - - - - -. .:.. :u yt:- 4y.1"' y.F% ,LE4�}2"t'Y +j�A35' St,�'s"$.i:� is X'"Y'h - - 4S a''`�' {�, ,,r _ .: - - - ..e•*,:,xi, �" ,)� ,�j ya.•uJ'.'zsi'e Li M,Si __,- - _ _ - <,,... ,.. .iixi �4^ fai%:,.q"t', IttlL wY.iSiY Y,.jd'':ix,?'„d :'1 { - - _ - . , .: .:. Yf ::rvL'i:1ta'� St, '1 - ..'S' it y, - :Lq3.: <,.., ,G tt }4".-t I y, - - _ - - .,£ *, �i .ff5`'€fi �;n ;:. ,,:§,+'P'x'4�r"-G ah! . rN'; ,,;Sr.*>",�:lc';' Y ., ",::" - - - - - € S' .#' ;";:i�,p. - - - - - - - ,'i - - - - >�,X:n . , . _ » ,k 3V X,,},t:`„w u t„:,,.. d'i- ' »:: - �' - _, - _ - .',g-' - - `± �' '', - - - 'il' - 7'ey,-,:'�ydi "' tixa' H: ' s" , _ _ - - Ea - ' - - - � - - - ,, , r , _ _ _ �' _ _ a k 5' - .�' _ : , , 3,, q 'G<... i _ - - y - ' •- Yy _ - - - - - . x'.z `� .: ASS'' ,y :~... ��...,.. ,, , ', ' N. x r s a r. °s , _. � e-a„ rrp `, o i - �;'. �r , Jf s �,' . _ -, s t:r. s- :a `° 1« ; t; "= x> ; Zf ' X• - .4L -> _ £. pia p� - - _ j. ` �t 5 t' k• r. ib . , , ::,,_. ', , '. � m ' r.; ...:>t. r � - �^t - w eee '41 :. _ _ a r#- y: a, 3, np,,t S :R J ,. y �, � 0110-.1,11�1'-.1z_�,"� iuiii';tt:: J :Y tt L rt' �, i :i G As `GY a.,. as l Jt ». �' Ar 4> -�s+'. t 'di' ,Y 1 �`d tt 3" "a � .f 'r w-" x ,t,t, ,r , a ,3`A� Cr. v z d m, t d "'C# ` Y w� � 'k"x '•k' .S F # c 7' r yk w -- - r1ur+ K+.n ✓r Y Y ' 'i' " {ter,. k,k. x ,.'• - t z fir+ x ''�+'=' -}•` .i%�'r y .,} . .r#: -,mot,. r.. .}r r '{-e Y i 4 . t� ' � Syr � J »$-:.:'-_' _ ..}; .''�' � `^L - ''Y.,! {mob: a :k, fin' 3 v rzi x. y� r . }. .a•< '31 p .. ,7• b .' , S">-J.7 ..,. "' ,'"..� 5 :r ,' �.a- �r�. Y,rY _ y .t � ., .,a _ ...�r- 'x, o-x m s F ,i s, k, 1. - -7a.9. `fir.- ,�- at,' & t:.. :' Z - ,.,s. �, ,,. : ,r . ::. -. - -,- ,. _ r- : r ?duc'= _ _ -fit "'� ". .�" ,.' • ,. .x�.:".a'.`w,y, _�.+ ,aX , -a?' , - x . -,r:[its ' Y.,, . >+ 3 +•,�,. , •:k Lai' � P'�i a : �- . �6.r. z .,:# -3a ryas .�' '.,,.' : ,sJ. t , ex <. �, . £`' ";tea'" ,.�:. , �. >:> :�' .'a> ` , c n "c i. i:,. �w. l «� 4i„w ,t6" - :#, ai 1 `•SZ x '-',ii6''.'.u, x1 U' r .m'�L Nn ,zf1i'' r i z,;tS,b, 1`1 . h� .�.0 . . 1 T % h .k. _ f� "G`-. a- d r .-9 1. 'P i :'fi _ : i r. ,,,,3 d . fib - f_J 3= ti. � , .y- ,,P - p ..Y § {' :}• _ , n, r, ?::� " _ >' ,•Y ` Wit''... may^ �e, _ a _ .t.=. ,fin ..ri _^Y Jr, 'i.3 •":atM.", _� ' 't:;�, , b .,u} ,k" ^t' . i3 3 t f Y" . i ai,,.r •x: .'. r' a < .x - , ";fit"• r�i+ - ,t� '€i• y r: , p, ' r .e- .e • .y ,'dry.-s=a'fi '^ r'.> ", Y , e ,� ?z t ter•.,, ,. a+ ' r �' i' ,>�' :.,s �I �uZ ':.tf� ' ; ins ,'3rt. ::.t .� .L .! Y:'i "`•)" arse yy - qy � ��+ ri j,t _ ,.R,. yy�� u,'''S r♦ � '. .t.. a.. 'il +'r'-h,-.;',<. .. e,:'r. m- i " „ 'n,.'f'.3: S ... SL , Y I ,._ts ...., �*r,C� . P',^. -1' <.i....li •,K^? .,r_ .... .'^'$' � � ., x .. - , / a ,.'l,Y^, :,( ^ r , r :t„: tk ,Nr' i ' '`J ,. '9.•r:}; ,. �, _ , Pam, - �} ty' E ' ^'4* rp, y{ z,�v, " t- .3 P } ,5. w •'i'" 'tip' }-' d' .?l j'^�+t�' ,,$3 1 } 3 i� ri� " y_ :. .i `• ';gip: t�.. -'f�.ARXxb ;n y," "s� R� t'v:y L, ,v rs. , :�*, Fair w.`''.e£+ n7 v � . '.,�+ x l � � .tu -r-' :`tam'" ,",fr a#.a 'ems` 'J 1 �' ;,'"',' �,z„ ''"R,.. HOW 1�3 ': .� d_-' ., s �'- '..,; ram:.... a' p4<- . �. Yid .,8 - :aP':, aq t {ti9+<, :zed A ,. i ,, 4 .P ate:, .. n to ' . , ><- ," - ,.. ` r ,;,, -,�> . �+e'E .;,' . =,� - � , a , rr:., ' ads' ,.�n. ., " . • s a< • ;; .,, $� ,v� i• , ... o-- ° '�,� _ :,. ' . 'b -:.� .,r .-' ,: •_^`M . - '.. :;. ... m :r . a; '^,� 1, ,. `:„_ :ts -a;' .,,. _;iY ..1� ! , , �. .z ✓" _ ,l. :ate t�v. -.- ,. .. . %- -6 ,./ .- a ._. ,:c, *'{ ..ri '''C 'i �� I §a' r'{�,_ .t , , -. .. -,±. ., .- s., -, .. �L- < _ -, f �. .ni _4 - � ,-. ,', "'-. ': ri':w �`ix- a3d,_: .3 J.. / ., . N IZ 1 a a n z b x:' n li " r rv•% a • .>.13 r. u c e , "'^'' s 1' AM—4' Y cif" " ..';�*' - a' ,� i..a .� . �>.' ".... ,•,xz . . r , -a ,c +�.. ' 11kk d, ^+ b _t, : a 1r. lT'', .9T. '"#� , -rat.,.-.=Yl' r,'i.. F}r :,tit: «} •-,�f�d " .... f•� -u - G' X , 'sir ».y� : r ' .. 7 t�^,� ak Y '�- is qq� ' } Sfl. � �'. .yam. w."r Y . %*~,- .?'a'`.' n' .'SSA' T - , .: :t ->., ._ r.r "^ '" ': : 'c '.' a+I"t3:,'., ..:,�' - 4at"u•.. "'§""" t3` .p •""'t_ ., �'. _��'aa as a _:: ., �, w , y�' "., y - :. : - ,'�� �t• ., _ :, � -, a .:- r, .. {-. ,� .. ..: . ..... ... . .. .. .� _ ..s sr�, r.,,, - M",, iyr,s i of x . �''r �'.. +s3• "z:;��" . '-.it"' :,i". 'r a ,� ` � 3 > s _. , ... ,- t r,« .. - 4.^e .,, ,. .7'. -.-�`a:�:4++tS - W ,-,_ fl" r`. .'ti,-- si+:". u", -.•»-, c �.' p „•^t .... .,__.... ..- ._ u +.': w, •'. r 'r . : ,WYG= ..i= .. _ .:. J. _ .hz ,t, a�,5r. a.t.. .>q, ..6 t . r.:` ,M�` , . '} ";.'• e r.,,u"- . .._ .'s'.'.:_ ... s,Y,„ _ e. _ +CAE. ,9. > .-.s+�a•.. -,y.. pay.,., ,,,,.. -1,. °., �: ,,,, - _.-.,..4__. _. _,. .3.. Yam: '.#' -$::� %•M ,43:?or... '"�•, :;K3• �c�;.s 1- sb-- - ,s_ 4_',.i '.':s..a,.,_., 1....-.._. F+tY,,>x,fia;'"tx�,' ''-r :,,� l}fi.rs - - :k' -.%Y �>'...::.: v.'137ewr-.. ..';�' fh''...+wa'aiSa--at`..a'F.:.�. .riri�::rv;,fr'.`'.'uk§m>;�:a.,.....,a.,..,x.,.._«r,.�,. w-::rsYuu. �. %#:». ,_'R.::.,s. 5.,-..-...er<_Yz..�...^ ....._dz ...,._x-v.-s_4... ._..»....'_...Ss,.'v..na...«., e..._.x.s,0.4. '�: IIIIoil Na 21 0,;V Isit W, t T ion -ow oar_, 1 M �W AW Wpm try Iz —pligMAN In oil QA S "Vq I - -11 X� - , 6. : 1 Iwo we IIToo Em. Iwoo -,,i I0: IIIIYW , * , OINK" ," II=AM 1� we g 4 10 .1 mow- q IIon II............ IIQuo INMI Ewa 2 I1 Eli j ANA IIIma AlsM two MW Am go III31 Iow vs ................... INov = IIRE IIffi woo 5, IIIre;. I0-1012: Ask sj?, i IIIIIItwill 'Koo If� al 1 I!nq qi"�A '".- IIIIIITITS IIinn, .4.e low, I -ways I-Zow Iof IAll IA now&, ,link Has 1 IIoar, I -•.�.- ,siP ��•� � R,p,r� is r�„ay '}� �." • = - '� y�, .•: � -, - i � .` � `tt- s� �. �r y nor 3• � yp ��' .�' . ea. f,� '*- S s � • #.$ +� ��y� ,3,i �? f � s Fes'-++{ � # t .- P i � �, , a •� Hs 7� e, ,lam c t - x.a _ a � yx. , L ' v? f" „rat - S •1 r - a„y� . ` -f t l r x"- a `P ';F S `d t: -•.,-� - nit-::.✓� \ y: ft } �I ss 5 P l fj ' t'fi r,, ) Y 3' jj on,_ t A,, J �r k N ffi t: k L- M 1 FF+ C' z ga ' fi y� � �` ..=.'.;, Win'. i - - «.w x, Ion R �•�tt,•'-- � f � S+I :it mn' iti LEI - - d- , yy s ti r .a - mow= t r v , .x ♦y c : + y 4 2 } 2 G,, .,L _.. i� r,3 of 1 vE _ `t `i , �p tt�e y t „ 4 ith cs � , i ;r �I t r w. t� r� t slow,Xi CEO.1 Lt t} } 1{,F axfi# 4` 1 �S ty •w s ....Six �.' + 1. N t "s t, ,rr .d 7 r`ry,. 7 ga F� d =J4 ^•a. d t "r. x' w �' es ET..{',:.� T++*t Siv N�r .r x .8 m. a_ "may aE -Yn y 1% Y, , P' - w � x ' VY s VAN -1, j ' Center ' - , _ .� ,e -r Y . �, �-,. '. .., : i. ,., ,..,. .. .'1•: y',9s' Aoo Park Brazos County µ _ `3 j Community Park ! i i u� - �k Bryan Reg, lonai Athletic Park i , s, S' ax F n"ivr• "�:r t �y .,t 5 -i I t }� "8 , .- .' 'r-. . •, '-...,. ,.,. rw _ > .�«, .. ... .. :. .fir .. - - - -." - .: -.'.. .: �"`��'- s a.i.' F' ,..w ,,.m'+K .. `�.,5 _ .`+:ate ••afx'"R•^ 1x:-'L W. , ' '�' _ - �' t, ` w � t A td xs a-- .t trt- i -t , W s�t,w :.x.',.t .�'r..a 'vw--,. .- ,,r;, -,, - •;t �Y',,,t •: + I"a .,ra �` - i l' w 5 Y ✓~q y rY ^i+ �➢}� �:g si 9Ne -y.Y. S • t '' tea _ .ri mod, C y X•. g _ 5 - a s, r, rr 'd9 uq-•, t��� ` f� :S W p• " t, ��,, n.,•k �9. r� N . r M1 . rR' _ r, _ x , t , : t w , 'Y oil==Y _ r .d i. - i. 7. - i ..J `3ir g� , �qr+pp 1 "tTd '{v' r. � t F, `t t }I wt ` F F t : _ + _ f. t `L { . PY W Amoyt } �4 i t w,t r 5' • N f' i , """"�...�'�.>w.,':�"; u� X .t` r , i +. ," . . , �; r t, �� fir.` bfW e"'.•°F "`r,:. N ,C " An too But MY top, Fj TOY; �tn tg � • �, t ., p , r i - L +r "3 v �} rF z- v� t %Et 4- k _ a , 5 "4 i, 1 Ai! g • 4 {"t r 1. �j n. � t•w �} i h F J• A'r �r L �1. � t 1, ,,..,.E Ayti' — 'F r"' y z ,r ' y i N t g Al ! - i i y� ( :s _ r ? - r F • �,.. � + t K7.ri A J ' .3 y. 4 s f{ t , Y .'t, ..«y:�,:.-,..t., ,ry....-:.v{.-.,.-±- •t*, Y, = :�- v,.»s 7'SF.-�. ;'4 E. � v,,"•....+ _ - •� } ",ice ` ' t.:.:.:�.,.-..,...,, ......-. ...,. r.s � �'„j�' fL:+,:=`,✓ , T `W%.m>"'ci u»a-+rv'v ' it" � ''� $ - • _ � - --_.�_ _ ' tr. :� � - - - 4:` i'.t , t .i ,,;�"'^.� ^`2°"x' '�tsE"": :.m s'�'t-'t hJ��' i-__ 4 , t ` � • � .. - �*,>y, ; k. IInil , i. `i , „ k ti• , • fir.. .. r , . „, .:, ~� - ! �..�?<" — i"�{,- � :art r c' Itoo p . ""..+..Y-- •. .... •ram , ., :'. .. -.;:: .. � _ - - — „ SE mot{ E , e • , r ' by � - .. -�, .. ::• „�,:',, ��., .-�:. ". ;' .,.: +,,_ - / O'Malley Engineers, LIT CITY OF COLLEGE STATION VETERANS PARK AND ATHLETIC FACILITIES OE JOB NO. 675.01-RB July 5, 2001 PROJECT SCHEDULE Submit Final Plat, Final Plans, Final Drainage Report and Specifications to Parks Dept. July 20, 201 Receive Review Comments on Final Plat, Final Plans, Final Drainage Report and Specifficati-10nis by Parks Department August 3,2001 Submit Final Plat, Final Plans, and Specifications to Development Services (and P & Z) August 10, 2001 Approval of Final Plat, Final Plans, and Specifications by Development Services (and P & Z) September 6, 2001 Advertise For Bids September 14, 2001 Open Bids October 12, 2001 Award Contract October 25, 2'!n Contractor's Notice to Commence Work November 26, 2001 Construction Completion November 26, 2002 Craig Kankel, P.E. Robert C. Schmidt, RE Ed Addicks, RE KA675-01 Wletter\project schedule revised.doc 203 S. Jackson P. O. Box 1976 Brenham, Texas 77834-1976 (979) 836-7937 FAX (979) 836-7936 From: "George W.R. (Bill) Davis' <bill@pianoplace. net> To: 'Kris Startzman'<KSTARTZMAN@ci.co4lege-station.b(,us> Date* 7/5101 8:50PM Subject- Request for Excused Absence Kris I will be out of Town on Tuesday. I am the chapter delegate to the Piano Technicians Guild International Institute and seminar being held from July 8-15 in Sparks NV, Please- excuse my absence. I I Z From: Jon Turton <jturton@mail.st-joseph.org> To: 'Kris Startzman'<KSTARTZMAN@ci.college-station.tx.us> Date: 7/5/01 1:OOPM Subject: RE: July 10th Parks Board Meeting Kris- 1 am requesting an absence from this meeting. I am a Coach of the College Station American All -Star team and have a game that evening at that time. V 0 0 ision of OurExpansion Plan4 Our expansion plan has an acronym: Blrazos AildmaR shelterf Er'PaIMORGIM, Education, and Endowment. The 3 E's help us describe our efforts to. Emioznd with our comprehensive long range plan Educate to progressively solve pet problems, leading to responsible pet ownership Endow life-saving programs with solid private funding We recently purchased a site for our new facility. Our staff continues to train so that they can educate pet owners in the Brazos Valley, and we are excited that our future endowment already has funding. Phase n New Shelter with more space for education and adoptions Phase 11 Farm Education Center Phase IH Pet Park that is fenced for off leash activities Phase IV Pet Memorial Gardens and Trails Phase V Dog Obedience Training Pavilion Phase VI Nature Center and Wildlife Rehabilitation I qqjWjW.C. ado Mal ardSitects fiftiors c) Citizen Committee Orientation Parks & Recreation Advisory Board — Handouts — Parks and Recreation Department Calendar. Parks and Recreation Department Resource Guide. Updated Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Subcommittee Listing. City of College Station Strategic Issue Plan (Draft). Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Fiscal Year 2001 Goals and Objectives. Policy for Naming City of College Station Parks and Recreation Facilities. Guidelines for Placing Monuments, Memorials, and Exhibits on Public Land or in Public Facilities. Park Land Dedication Ordinance. City of College Station Parks and Recreation Boart Current List mfSubcommittees: Skn+pP,rk,.,_,.,.,,,,,^.,,^.,, T�re"--� Jon. ` ----- Wood, ^~~^~^ �hr� nn����=n T»�w� � K��^�Davis,Recreation, -_--� .-'. ../~.. ~�.~~~^"�.°^ ^^°^^_____^____ ~'^°^ ���°/ .^..,..,^.....,...^'..^.,.' ^' Yn�� . �«�� ,. ,,,',,,'^^^^,,.,~'^.^~~^�^^`^~^°'^�,�°^^^^,,omptu� Joint Ventures with CSISD .......................... IChris Barzillal, Glen Davis Joint Ventures with TAMU ............... .... John Nichols, tqgqr�e Dresserl Other committees members are currently serving, on: Community Attractions Committee ................................... Laura .,=°d Wolf Pen Creek Oversight ........................................... Glenn Schroeder Identify current customer service Droblems related to development applicants and customers. August 2001 Identify communications problems, customer service issues through survey and analysis of customer group by Development Services Continuous Improvement Team. September 2001 Continuous Improvement Team meet with development community representatives to go over survey findings, discuss possible areas for improvements. October 2001 Continuous Improvement Team prepare specific recommendations to address issues identifies through survey, focus group. Recommendations presented to Department Heads of impacted departments, ACM. Develoo communications programs and products to ensure the development community is provided information as needed. September 2001 Review information currently provided to development customers, neighborhood organizations, website, etc. September 2001 Meet with development community representatives to determine what types of information products and services would be most beneficial. October 2001 Develop form and content of reports, information and publications as necessary to respond to needs identified. Develop processes or ongoing series of communications and relations meetings as necessary to respond to needs identified. Review current DredeveloDment meeting format and Drocedures to identify Droblems that cause inconsistencies or uncertainties in Drovidina information and responses to development applicants. June 2001 Review form, content, scope and purpose of predevelopment meetings and other processes use to respond to developer proposals and questions. July 2001 Meet with development community representatives to discuss customer needs. August 2001 Identify, implement changes in the predevelopment - pre -application processes and communications. Implementation Plans Plan leader: Julie O'Connell, Director of Human Resources Summary: Continue to monitor compensation levels through salary surveys to determine 601' percentile and to move towards paying at that market rate. This is an ongoing plan. Policy Change: This policy was approved by the City Council in April 2000. Resources: $1,876,848 is included in the FY 02 proposed budget to fund the pay plan and associated market adjustments. Key Milestones: October 2001 Adjustment of exempt salaries by 3% not to exceed midpoint January 2002 FY 02 market adjustments based on 2001 salary survey results. April 2002 Annual salary survey complete ��a�Ptirsu�� �» e�itiueco�teft�cfr�e�heghyu�J�tyt�eal�hnsura�c+ei�eref!�s..,�����.�.�E ��' Plan leader: Julie O'Connell, Director of Human Resources 11 Summary: Constantly monitor financial status and quality of service of health insurance for employees and their dependents. This is an ongoing plan. Policy Change: The City will move towards contributing 80% of plan costs and the employee portion will approximate 20%. Plan design changes will be recommended where appropriate. This is based on the Health Benefits Policy approved by Council November 2000. Resources: An additional $644,000 is included in the FY 02 proposed budget to fund the health plan. Additional increases of approximately $600,000 per year are forecast for the following 3 years. Key Milestones: July 2001 Review plan performance in conjunction with five year financial forecast October 2001 City contribution increases go into effect January 2002 Plan design changes and employee premium increases go into effect July 2002 Review plan performance in conjunction with five year forecast c, , ;: Promote pew®al,a� prvfessronal errapB�e.Ve!®parent. ° E ' Plan Leader: Julie O'Connell, Human Resources Director Summary: Continue all existing and consider development of new programs that develop employees both professionally and personally with an emphasis on customer service and continuous improvement. This is an ongoing plan. Policy Change: None required Resources: Additional resources could include overtime to staff positions when sending employees to training; costs associated with "in-service" training programs; and costs associated with skills training in the departments. Continue to use "in house" experts where appropriate to reduce costs. Key Milestones: October 2001 Develop Training Policy with emphasis on becoming a "learning" organization January 2002 Complete continuous improvement training overview in the departments April 2002 Develop advanced training in continuous improvement and customer service ®nets„r" arse! Ideniffy 6hairr� errrllneefetr rate; .411».: .. .....re. Plan Leader: Julie O'Connell, Human Resources Director Summary: Compare retention rate with benchmark Cities, and report this rate and corresponding trends to the Council annually. Compile analysis of why employees are leaving and at what level; use information to target recruiting efforts. This is on ongoing plan. Policy Change: None required Resources: No additional resources at this time Key Milestones: 12 May 2002 Issue retention rate report to Council e. Promote employee recognition through identifying and developing meaningful recognition programs Plan Leader: Julie O'Connell, Human Resources Director Summary: Continue all existing and consider development of new programs that recognize and reward employee achievement, excellent customer service, and continuous improvement efforts. This is an ongoing plan. Policy Change: None required Resources: Budget at least at FY01 level for recognition programs Key Milestones: December 2001 Implement Continuous Improvement team to review current recognition programs, improve and/or add new ones a, Implement deregulation strategic plan Plan Leader: John Woody, Public Utilities Director Summary: The implementation phase of the electric deregulation strategic plan will commence in October 2001. The implementation phase will consist of development work by both staff and consultant on action plans identified in the strategic plan. These action plans deal with the following areas; Financial, Operations/Engineering, Customers, Energy Supply, City Issues, New Business Opportunities, Community Issues. This will be an ongoing project for the next several years. Policy Change: It is anticipated that there will be numerous police changes required in moving into the newly deregulated environment in the electric industry, especially if the City Council decides to opt -in to electric competition. The scope and extent of policy changes will be better know as the action plans are developed. Resources: Use of outside consulting services will be required to develop and implement the action plans. Currently there is $100,000 allocated and approved by Council for outside consulting services to assist in completing a Business Plan for the Utility. This Business Plan will incorporate results of the action plans that will be developed. It is anticipated that there will be ongoing expenses by the Utility in the advertising and marketing area as it pertains to the deregulated electric environment. Additional personnel to handle the additional responsibilities are also expected. Key Milestones: September 2001 Final Draft of the Strategic Plan will be given to Council. October 2001 Commence work on action plans. April 2002 Action plans and Business Plan to be completed. 13 Implementation Plans a. Faculties /Plaster Plane Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: This is a long-range plan that focuses on strategic facilities planning and maintenance of existing infrastructure. The citizens of College Station have a large investment in facilities used by citizens and staff. The plan will address the requirements for, and maintenance of, these facilities. Policy Change: City Council adopts Facilities Master Plan and instructs staff to follow guidelines established. Resources: Initially the plan will be developed in-house using Department of Public Works resources. In future years additional staff may be required. Key Milestones: October 2001 Present draft policy copy to Management Team for review and comment. December 2001 Present revised policy to Management Team for final review and comment. April 2002 Present Facilities Master Plan to Management Team. May 2002 Present Facilities Master Plan to City Council. develop a rttciBtt yeai e-g�uernmentftelec®trtrrt�trrrcaftor plan #hat balances persona! k Plan Leader: Linda Piwonka, Director of Office of Technology & Information Services Summary: Electronic Government (E-Government) is the provision of convenient, costs effective customer services, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. A plan will be developed that identifies the components needed, in terms of technology, personnel, and funding, that will allow the City to improve access to City services while maintaining high personal customer service standards. It is anticipated that using a modified approach the full deployment of services electronically will take initially 5 years and then will be an ongoing effort. This is a long-term plan. Policy Change: Council commitment to move toward integrated use of various internet and telecommunications technologies while continuing current commitment to high standards of personal customer service. Resources: a. $60,000 in additional resources to hire outside consulting assistance to develop E-Government plan and use of Telecommunications/Internet in the delivery of city services. Other resources will be identified at the time of the plan development. b. An SLA for $207,500 was approved for the purchase of Internet hardware/software that will allow payment of utility bills via the Internet or telephone. c. $34,500 has been appropriated to add credit card payment capabilities. 14 Key Milestones: April 2001 September 2001 December 2001 January 2002 January 2003 February 2003 April 2003 d. An SLA for $ 61,417 has been submitted in the FY02 Budget for an E- Government Coordinator. This position will be utilized to coordinate and integrate the various systems needed to accomplish putting utility payments and court citations online. The position will also coordinate all city Internet web page changes. Prepare budget requirements for plan Council approval of modified plan and budget Training/Advertising of new services provided electronically First electronic services are brought online Conduct survey to evaluate electronic service utilization/satisfaction Evaluate Results and Modify E-Government Plan to meet further needs Submit Modified multi -year plan through budget process c fefe. Cif, Ceiefer Plan (Phase fj Plan Leader: Glenn Brown, Assistant City Manager Summary: In December of 2000 the City Council approved a concept plan for a City Center project as recommended by the City Center Ad Hoc Advisory Committee. The anchor facility for the City Center is a new City Hall. The project is to be located between Krenek Tap Road and Harvey Mitchell Parkway. Phase 1 of this plan involves the purchase of property for City Hall and other public purposes. This phase also includes the development of an overlay -zoning district to ensure development of the surrounding property based on the adopted concept plan. Future phases will include construction of a new City Hall and development of the privately owned sections of the property in accordance with the concept plan. Policy Change: None foreseen at this time. Resources: $1.5 million in 1998 bond funds designated for City Center land purchase. Staff time will be required from the Land Agent and planning staff. Key Milestones: August 2001 Completion of process for identifying property in plan areas to be used for a City Hall and the ROW needed for the extension of Dartmouth from Krenek Tap Road to FM 2818. October 2001 Needs resolution presented to City Council for property to be Purchased. December 2001 Land Survey and Appraisal Complete February 2002 P&Z adoption of Overlay Zone for City Center March 2002 Council Adoption of City Center Overlay zoning district. April 2002 Either complete negotiations with property owners or request Council authorization to institute condemnation proceeding. June 2002 Close purchase of land if negotiated sale, and take possession of property. December 2002 Commission Hearing if Condemned, and take possession of property. Plan Leader: Charles Cryan, Director of Fiscal Services Summary: New 5-year CIP. Develop plan for Capital Improvement Plan for the next five (5) years. Policy Change: No change, reintroduction of process for general government capital projects that will plan for projects not included in the 1998 bond authorization election. 15 Resources: City staff from Public Works, Parks, Administration, Police, Fire, Development Services, Finance and budget to identify, scope and, estimate the costs of various capital projects for streets, parks, fire, police, economic development, etc. Key Milestones: September 2001 Select staff who will begin planning process. February 2002 Collect all identified projects including scope, estimated costs (in current $'s), anticipated duration of project, and anticipated lead time for each project, (i.e., including time necessary to acquire rights -of -way, easements or outright purchase.) February 2002 Present list of identified projects to City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission. Request additional projects identified by either council or P&Z, direct projects to the appropriate staff for technical review and develop project information similar to projects identified by staff. March 2002 Council appoint a citizens committee to review all projects. April 2002 Identify any additional projects identified by citizens. Refer additional projects to appropriate staff to determine scope, cost estimates, time requirements of projects, land acquisition, as for other projects. April 2002 Develop estimate of funding availability within the existing debt service portion of ad valorem tax rate. April 2002 Citizens committee rank all projects identified and June 2002 Develop a list of potential projects to be included in an election for general obligation bonds. July 2002 City Council finalize list of projects that it wishes to include in a general obligation bond election. September 2002 City Council call bond election for November, 2002. October 2002 Prepare citizen information explaining issues to be included on the general obligation bond election ballot. November 2002 Hold bond election January 2003 Establish priorities for projects approved in the November election and develop bond issuance calendar for the approved projects. 16 Vision Statement #2 As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from living in a safe, secure and healthy environment. Strategy #1 To protect life and property, we will provide adequate fire protection and emergency medical services to all College Station citizens Implementation Plans a. Countywide Fire Station Planning b. Proactive Fire Station planning and site acquisition c. Enhance traffic pre-emption program Strategy #2 To plan for College Station's infrastructure needs, we will review annexation policy and options Implementation Plans a. Staff prepare annexation service plan, fiscal impact analysis and resolution; and implementation of service plan. Strategy #3 To increase the safety and security of our streets, we will take action to promote public safety Implementation Plans a. Street markings b. Red-light running. c. Overall public safety/education plan. d. Thoroughfare lighting. e. Police accreditation. f. Police reserve program. Strategy #4 To contribute to breaking the cycle of poverty and providing intervention for families in crisis, we will encourage holistic, multi -agency social services Implementation Plans a. Improve information and Referral system. Strategy #5 To protect the environment and our residents, we will enhance recycling, composting, and other disposal capabilities Implementation Plans a. Initiate multi -family recycling and increase recycling promotion/education. 17 As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from living in a safe, secure and healthy environment. m Effective, efficient fire and police protection • Adequate water and sewer services, drainage m Sanitation w Adequate lighting • COmrDuAhu Policing • Public Health Services • Emergency Management ImDlementation Plana Plan Leader: David Giordano, Fire Chief Summary: This plan is one of three submitted for Council Vision Statement number two, provide adequate Fire and EMS services. This plan will address the continuation of last years fire station planning and potential opportunities for cooperative ventures with Bryan and Brazos County Fire Departments. Policy Change: Council policy has shifted from the Fire Department maintaining an ISO rating ofthree toproviding adequate fire and EMS services. Resources: This plan will be carried out with current personnel resources within the College Station Fire 8epadment, College Station Q|S. Bryan and County .. Fire Departments. `Key Milestones: 5eptembor 2001 9naoentation, discussion and possible council action regarding future opportunities for joint facilities planning. October 2001 Develop future fire station facilities planning aodirected byCouncil. October 2001 Revise Strategic Implementation Plan asdirected byCouncil. Plan Leader: David Giundano, Fire Chief Summary: This plan will address land ncquieiUon, conaboubon, and staffing of fioy station number five. Policy Change: Council policy has shifted from the Fire Department maintaining an ISO rating ofthree hoone ofproviding adequate fire and EMS services. Resources: This plan will require the addition of substantial personnel, aquipmerd, and facilitate resources over the three years. 18 Key Milestones: February 2002 Determine final location for fire station five. April 2002 Begin land acquisition process for station five. June 2002 Begin contract and design phase for fire station five. January 2003 Begin contract phase for construction of fire station five. January 2004 Open fire station five. "Time line undetermined for next city CIP program. CSFD will be submitted items under the next CIP. Plan Leader: David Giordano, Fire Chief Summary: This plan will address the continued implementation of a traffic light pre- emption system in College Station whereby emergency vehicles will be able to control intersection traffic lights during emergency response. The system will enhance emergency vehicle responses by allowing responding apparatus to turn traffic lights green dependent upon their direction of travel. There are currently thirteen traffic lights and seven Fire Department vehicles equipped with the Opticom system. Policy Change, Council policy has shifted from the Fire Department maintaining an ISO rating to three to providing adequate fire and EMS protection. Resources This plan will be carried out with funding provided for in the CIP Traffic Enhancement program. 3M company is the primary provider for this system. Milestones, July 2001 Assess traffic patterns and review future traffic light plans in College Station August 2001 Determine most appropriate intersection for Opticom installation. April 2002 Complete phase two of equipment installation May 2002 Assess effectiveness of Opticom phase two. June 2002 Begin assessment for phase three "Opticom" installation ImMernentation Plans -I gem, tadas�ce P firx F_ z_ r Plan Leader, Jim Callaway, Development Services Director Summary, This plan is a continuation and further development of the annexation feasibility study recently completed and presented to Council. This work is now proceeding in accordance with Council direction. This implementation plan provides a summary of the steps that will be taken in that process. Policy Change, This plan will lead to the development of new annexation policy. Resources, New resources will be needed to fully implement this plan. Key Milestones, May 2001 Prepare outline service plan. June 2001 Prepare detailed mapping, property owner identification, acreage and related information for analysis. August 2001 Service plan information, CIP prepared by operating departments. 19 September 2001 Present service plans, CIP, fiscal impact analysis to Council, include resolution to initiate process. October 2001 Prepare boundary descriptions of annexation area, legal notices, schedule hearings. February 2002 Council adopt annexation ordinance. May 2002 Prepare and submit service level adjustment for annexation related postage, legal notice, deed research and boundary description. Implementation Plans ;e SeP !➢tl�iI09eYe Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Develop a standard striping plan for thoroughfare streets. This is a long term plan that will begin in FY 2001 and become an annual program thereafter. Policy change: Coordinate standard according to current 5-year thoroughfare plan. Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Develop a standard striping plan for thoroughfare streets. Resources: This plan will require a continuing appropriation of $20,000 annually for the next 4 years. In the FY 2001 budget the first installment was approved by the Council. At the end of this period there will be $100,000 in the Streets Maintenance budget for maintenance of installed street markings. KeyMilestones: Install new pavement markings on resurfaced streets annually in the month of Julv.. Plan Leader: Ed Feldman, Chief of Police Summary: Due to the high number of accidents at intersections due to vehicles running red lights, the police department has implemented a plan to have officers to work intersections that have high accident rates. Policy change: There are no formal policy changes. However, the department has increased emphasis on working intersections by directing traffic officers to focus on intersections and to assign officers on an overtime basis. Resources: The police department is in the second year of a three-year grant for officers to work intersections. The grant covers 75% ($26,069) of the cost for officers to work intersections. The City will need to finance the 25%match ($8,690). The 10 worst accident intersections have been fitted with red light indicator lights (separate indicator lights mounted on the vertical pole). The Public Works Traffic Division has also modified specifications for traffic lights to include red light indicators. Key Milestones: September 2000 Retrofitted red light indicators at major accident intersections. August 2001 Submit SIA for Council consideration to finance the 25% matching funds for the Intersection Traffic Control grant. 20 Vision Statement # 2 Safe, Secure and Healthy Environment September 2001 Review high accident intersections. Establish work schedule for dates and times officers will work these intersections. c. Overall public safetyleducation plan Plan Leader: Kelley Cole, Public Communications & Marketing Manager Summary: Utilize marketing plan tactics and strategies to create and implement an overall Public Safety Education Campaign. Formulate a citizen education plan to modify behavior regarding traffic safety. Policy Change: Expansion of marketing public safety programs. Resources: Will use marketing tactics that are currently funded through the marketing plan. Key Milestones: December 2001 Develop program to create and implement a customized Public Safety Marketing Plan and Campaign January 2002 Begin implementation of customized Public Safety Marketing Plan and Campaign. December 2002 Review campaign success. d Thoroughfare lighting, Plan Leader: John Woody, Director of Public Utilities Summary: The thoroughfare lighting plan has been divided into several plans for the different types of streets in the City of College Station. The various plans are for Major Arterial, Minor Arterial, Major Collector, Minor Collector, and Freeways & Expressways, Residential street lighting improvements are handled one-on-one with the citizens and developers. The thoroughfare lighting plans are projected over the next five years for installation. Some are relatively simple plans using existing poles while others will require in- depth planning and design. Policy Change: No policy changes are foreseen at this time. Project designs will be closely monitored to adhere to operating standards already developed and utilized. Resources: Current resources will be used to implement this plan Key Milestones: 2001 Hwy 30/Harvey Road (Major Arterials) Texas Avenue (Major Arterials) 2002 Rock Prairie (Minor Arterials) Central Park Lane (Minor Collections) Edelweiss (Minor Collectors) Eagle Ave. (Minor Collectors) 2003 George Bush Drive (Major Arterials) Francis Drive (Major Collectors) Graham Road(Major Collectors) Baron Road (Minor Arterials) 2004 Wellborn Road (Major Arterials) University Drive (Major Arterials) Longmire (Major Collectors) 2005 Harvey Mitchell (Freeways and Expressways) Earl Rudder (Freeways and Expressways) Spring Loop Drive (Major Collectors) iA Hwy 30/Harvey Road (Major Arterials) 2006 Greens Prairie Road (Major Arterials) Plan Leader: Ed Feldman, Chief of Police (Sgt. Mark Langwell, Accreditation Manager) Summary: In August 2001, the College Station Police Department will undergo it's second reaccredidation on -site assessment by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies Inc. (CALEA). In November 2001, the College Station Police Department expects to receive it's reaccredidation status at the CALEA Conference in San Diego, California. The purpose of CALEA is to provide a voluntary accreditation process by which law enforcement agencies can strive for excellence by achieving compliance with over 400 standards, thus increasing the capabilities to prevent and control crime and increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the department. Policy Change: No formal policy change will be necessary. However, when new CALEA standards are adopted or existing standards are amended, departmental policy changes could occur. Resources: Because of the additional cost of the reaccredidation on -site in 2001, $11,490.00 was budgeted for in fiscal year 2000-01. This funding will not be required again until the next (3`d) reaccredidation on -site in fiscal 2004. Key Milestones: April 2001 Underwent "mock on -site assessment" August 2001 2"d Reaccredidation on -site assessment November 2001 Awarded 2"d Reaccredidation status — CALEA Conference — San Diego, California a➢.ra� ® ..i+...xa .,>rtr..c�i .xvNsu - .5....--iv`\d�'��'$`�. �'b`R� Si3T"v&5&`�`'�NaS` � - .xvs . .zS:.K�.,�.� a°..a.. � �ia ^':.:-�"� Plan Leader: Ed Feldman, Police Chief (Lt. Scott McCollum) Summary: Enhance public safety through the addition of a police reserve program would benefit the community by lessening overtime expenditures by supplementing current staff, and by adding people with specialized skills to department resources. Policy Change: The authority to establish a reserve police force in College Station is already provided through City Ordinance. Police department policy would be established to provide for specific guidelines and procedures. Resources: Current inventory could be used to dress and equip 5 new reserve officers. It is estimated that approximately $4,345 in additional funds would be required to purchase firearms and body armor. These funds will be obtained through alternate sources within the police department. Key Milestones: July 2001 Review state licensing, statutory requirements, and accreditation requirements for reserve police officers. 22 October 2001 Plan and conduct a recruiting drive to solicit potential applicants from the community to serve as reserve police officers March 2002 Establish reserve coordinator Implementation Plans Policy Change: None Resources: CDBG staff assistance and administrative budget support. Key Milestones: October 2001 Project Unity and Barbara Bush Parent Center will establish a base level of measurement for evaluating the effectiveness of enabling families to "break the cycle of poverty." September 2002 Have registered twenty Bryan/College Station providers of health and human services and three City Departments as TexasOne Client management System Partners. September 2002 Provide two community wide training workshops to 10 local non-profit providers of health and human services on agency collaboration, shared resources and community leadership skills. January 2003 Implementation of 2-1-1 Texas in the Brazos Valley Region. Calls will ring into First Call for Help call center. September 2003 Successful completion of development of a workforce training system that will expand opportunities for local residents to increase job skills by coordinating training activities of Barbara Bush Parent Center, Human Resource Department, Teen Apprenticeship Program and other area wide programs with demonstrated program outcome information. Implementation Plans a , lealtrate i M�l#�, family recycling and lricrease recycleng„promotion/e Plan leader: Jim Smith, Assistant Public Works Director/BVSWMA Director 23 Policy change Resources: Key Milestones: March 2002 May 2002 May (Annually) Identify recycling promotion/education needs for both residential and commercial locations. If warranted by multi -family recycling pilot program, add promotion/education to multi -family locations. This is a short-term plan. Current policy is single family residential only. The addition of commercial and multi -family residential would be an expanded service. Utilize existing staff resources. May involve the allocation of additional resources in FY 2003 due to expanded service in multi family areas. Review pilot multi -family recycling program data. During 2003 Annual Budget preparations, present recycling promotion/education program for multi -family residential if warranted by data review. Present for budget consideration, all proposed recycling promotion/education programs for single and multi -family residential and commercial locations. 24 Ti Mc Ert Quality of Life Vision Statemment#3 As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from living in a clean environment that enhances and protects the quality of life. Strategy #1 Tomaintain the quality ofour neighborhoods, vveviUatronoUhencoda enforcement inresidential areas Implementation Plans a. Enhance noise abatement enforcement program b. Examine and enhance a proactive code enforcement program Stradegy#2 To protect urban open space that provides recreation and mobility opportunities, we will implement a greenways system Implementation Plans a. Complete Wolf Pen Creek trails phase | and begin design ofphase Utrails b. Greenawayeducation plan Strategy#3 To protect the environment, we will endeavor to maintain storm water quality Implementation Plans a. Develop strategy for implementing federal storm water quality regulations Strategy #4 Tnprotect the environment, vvewill endeavor homaintain air quality e. Develop an urban forestry plan b. Examine alternative fuel options for the fleet 25 Quality Vision Statement # 3 Clean Environment that Enhances and Protects the As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from living in a clean environment that enhances 1 protects .o, _ quality o, life. ® Air quality ® Water quality ® Open space ® Greenways • Litter control/sanitation ® Noise abatement Plan Leader: Edgar Feldman, Police Chief Summary: In an effort to reduce the amount of noise complaints other associated criminal and code violations, the police department in conjunction with the University Police Department initiated an organized noise abatement program in August of 2000. The effort was successful and resulted in an approximate 78% increase in enforcement actions, and a 21% decrease in load party complaints. It is the police department's plan to increase enforcement and citizen education. Policy Change: No formal policy change has been necessary. However, the department is now pro -enforcement and in most cases an enforcement action is taken on the initial call. All responsible persons are cited if enforcement action is taken. The department now notifies the responsible property owner and/or manager of any enforcement actions taken on their respective property. Resources: No additional funding is anticipated for fiscal year 2002. Any overtime costs will be absorbed in the funded overtime budget. Funding for the police assistant of $61,316 was granted in fiscal year 2001. Key Milestones: July 2001 Police Assistant is hired August 2001 Re-evaluate program (include input from key payers involved in program: University Police, Bryan P.D., and Brazos County Sheriff) and implement any necessary changes August 2001 Begin educating citizens on the noise abatement program through Community Enhancement, Texas A&M University, Blinn College, and others. September 2001 Begin enforcement efforts with Texas A&M University Police and other local law enforcement agencies. January 2002 Evaluate 2001 noise abatement program Plan Leader: Dave Giordano, Fire Chief 26 Quality Vision Statement # 3 Clean Environment that Enhances and Protects the Summary: This will be complete review of ordinances, procedures and staffing dealing with code enforcement in residential areas of College Station to maintain the quality of our neighborhoods. This is a medium term plan. Policy Change: Policy changes may be needed if Council determines changes should be made to current ordinances, if stricter ordinances on property maintenance standards are adopted or if an increase in the amount of pro -active code enforcement is desired. Resources: Key Milestones: July 2001 September 2001 November 2001 January 2002 February 2002 June 2002 August 2002 Additional staffing resources will be determined once Council reviews and/or modifies existing codes and Community Enhancement activities. Present 2000 International Property Maintenance Code to Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals for review Conduct Benchmark Survey of code enforcement procedures and ordinances of cities with Big Twelve Schools. Present findings of study and public meeting to Council and receive direction on how they would like to proceed. Conduct a series of Stakeholder meetings to receive input from neighborhood planning teams, residents and rental property owners. Review current ordinances and draft revisions to come comply with City Council direction. Present draft ordinances to City Council during a workshop meeting. Modify implementation plan as per direction provided by City Council. Implementation Plans Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Complete design plans for lower and upper trail systems. This portion of the plan is considered short term. Policy change: The WPC development ordinance as it relates to the dedication of land for sidewalks/trails and channel improvements must be revised. Resources: Current staff resources and outside design services will be utilized. Key Milestones: September 2001 Design plans for the lower trail system. December 2001 Bids for construction of Phase I of lower trail system. Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Develop a greenways education program to educate the public, developers and community leaders about the benefits of greenways to our community and to provide guidance for the acquisition and development of greenways in 27 Tision Statement-4 3 Clean Environment that Enhances and Protects tha, Quality of Life Policy change: Resources Key Milestones: June 23, 2001 November 2002 Implementation Plans College Station. This is a long term project with activities beginning in FY 2001 and continuing annually thereafter. Promotion of greenways is currently one of the key responsibilities of the Greenways Program Manager. Greenways Program Manager, Brazos Greenways Council. Ribbon cutting on Bike Loop and Greenways Demonstration Project. Present annual Greenways education program activities. a�velop siif# HIrrsiplr�n%gfeitf ®iravatir garaiyregulauons Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Develop strategy for implementing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) phase II regulation. Policy change: EPA & TNRCC regulations require that the City comply with NPDES permit requirements including the following: ® Public Education & Outreach • Public Involvement / Participation ® Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination ® Construction Site Runoff Control ® Post Construction Storm Water Management ® Pollution Prevention for Municipal Operations Key Milestones: September 2001 December 2002 May 2002 March 2003 Implementation Plans Drainage Utility Funds, Water / Wastewater operations, Development Services staff, Code Enforcement, Public Works operations, Parks operations. Additional funding may be required in FY 2003 for additional staffing, consultants, and permit fees. Distribute Best Management Practices for public infrastructure. The NPDES permitting authorities are required to issue general permits for small MS4s and small construction activity. Include construction site runoff control and post construction stormwater management Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the Development regulations. Cities and small construction activities are required to obtain permit coverage. 29 EnvironmentVision Statement # 3 Clean Protects 4 Quality of Life Plan Leader: Ross Albrecht, Forestry Superintendent Summary: Develop an Urban Forest Management Plan for the City of College Station that will provide guidelines for Urban Forest Management including inventory, tree maintenance, and forest renewal. Policy Change: None. Resources: Staff time to prepare grant application and request for proposal. Grant request to Texas Forest Service in the amount of $10,000. SLA request for FY 2002 in the amount of $20,000. December 2001 Select consultant for project May 2002 Presentation of consultant's report to City Council and receive Council direction. June 2002 Determine the implementation plan based upon Council decision. July 2002 Submit implementation plan to Council for consideration. Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Identify alternative fuel options for basic fleet and emergency vehicles. This is a short-term plan. Policy change Review current policies and recommend changes as needed. Resources: Fleet replacement fund can be utilized to fund any alternative fuel options for the basic fleet and emergency vehicle purchases. Key Milestones: March 2002 Present proposed alternative fuel options and recommendations. 29 1 is ion Statement #4 As a result o , efforts benefit frombeing enriched';•. a range of cultural Strategy #1 To enhance cultural opportunities, we will work to develop a performing and visual arts center in College Station Implementation Plans a. Performing Arts Center in College Station. Strategy #2 To improve the quality of our parks system, we will implement parks maintenance standards Implementation Plans a. Implement park maintenance standards Strategy #3 To provide recreational opportunities to all residents, we will provide intergenerational park facilities Implementation Plans a. Implement intergenerational park design standards Strategy #4 To plan for community growth, we will maintain comprehensive parks planning processes and documentation Implementation Plans a. Create incentives for developers to provide adequate neighborhood parks b. Complete development of Veteran's Park and Athletic Complex c. Improve subdivision ordinance as it relates to Parkland location and Parkland Dedication approval process. d. Develop Master Plan for new community park site and current landfill site. Strategy #5 To meet the needs of College Station citizens, we will develop comprehensive leisure programs Implementation Plans a. Develop plans for future senior programs and facilities b. Prepare feasibility report on skateboard park Strategy #6 To enhance cultural opportunities, we will expand our existing public art program Implementation Plans a. Present analysis of current public art program to Council. b. Determine the resources needed to continue program at City facilities. 30 t �. ,!� •ru�n Strategy #7 To provide multi -use pedestrian recreation, we will connect parks facilities through greenways and other opportunities Implementation Flans a. Wolf Pen Creek masterplan implementation b. Implement demonstration project to establish a future policy regarding greenway-park connectivity. Strategy #8 To improve parks planning, we will increase communication between the City Council, Parks Advisory Board, and the Planning and Zoning Commission Implementation Plans a. Facilitate better communications between the City Council, Parks & Recreation Advisory Board and the Planning & Zoning Commission. 31 As a result of our efforts, citizens will benefit from being enriched by a range of •. recreational opportunities provided through citywide initiatives •' collaborative efforts. • Libraries • Performing Arts • Teen Center • Parks • Athletic activities • Recreation • Public art • Festivals • Museums .. erfoee�g�zs��er �a�®Ilse ta%t�b� a46 �:. Plan header: Charles Cryan, Fiscal Services Director Summary: Plan, design, construct and operate a Performing Arts Center within the City of College Station. Policy change: Create a new service level to provide a performing arts facility within the City of College Station that will expand cultural opportunities within the community. Resources: The estimated cost of the facility is $20,000,000 with an annual budget estimated to be approximately $465,000. Key Milestones: May 2001 Select site (complete, site selected in CS 30/60 Corridor) August 2001 Develop financing strategy to include seeking private donations, private not - profit foundation grants, governmental grants, and local governmental support, including the possible adoption of a venue tax. Operating expense would come from operating revenues, grants for operations and support from a number of entities in the area. December 2001 Report on results of fundraising efforts and determine additional resources necessary to fund the construction of the PAC. December 2001 Ask local governing bodies to authorize an election to provide a venue tax, if necessary. February 2002 Hold election for venue tax March 2002 Engage architect to design PAC August 2002 Authorize construction contracts for PAC August 2003 Authorize operational plan for PAC April 2003 Develop operating budget for PAC July 2004 Grand Opening of PAC i 32 Implementation Plans a , 'I plerrrebt parks ihain eraarice standards=',.. .. ... ..... ... ,._ .. Plan Leader: Curtis Bingham, Parks Operations Superintendent Summary: Implementation of the approved Park Maintenance Standards over a multi- year period. Policy Change: Change the method of parks maintenance operations from a scheduled service -based approach to a standards -based program as approved by City Council. Resources: Parks Operations and Forestry staff time, external landscape maintenance companies, and funding requests through the annual budget process. Key Milestones: August 2001 Develop performance measurement methodology to track the percentage of standard achieved. October 2001 Begin tracking performance utilizing approved methodology. December 2001 Submit the first quarter performance report to the Office of Budget and Strategic Planning. January 2002 Award the contract maintenance bid, if the SLA is approved. March 2002 Complete the recommendations for a future maintenance district, realignment, and additional support facilities. May 2002 Develop recommendations for future CIP program and budget requests based upon Council direction. Plan Leader: Eric Ploeger, Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation Summary: Implement intergenerational park design standards for new parks, as well as begin to retrofit current parks as the opportunity arises. Current CIP projects will be designed with these standards. Policy Change: Change park design process to include intergenerational park features as approved by the City Council in March, 2001. Resources: Bond funds, parkland dedication funds, staff time. Key Milestones: October 2001 Review potential Replacement Fund items and Park Land Dedication Fund availability for potential intergenerational projects, and implement as resources are available. December 2001 Include upgrades of existing parks an development of future parks in future CIP. FY 2002 Completion of Brison Park, Gabbard Park, and Merry Oaks Park, Madeley Park, Woodway Park, Spring Loop Park improvements expected. 33 Implementation Plans a. Create incentives for developers to provide adequate neighborhood parks. Plan Leader: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks and Recreation Summary: Investigate and recommend incentives for developers that will help provide larger neighborhood parks in locations that will better serve residents. Policy Change: Potential changes in policy to include incentives to aid park development. Resources: Existing staff and budget. Key Milestones: September 2001 Receive input from developers regarding potential incentives to improve park quality and locations. November 2001 Staff review and completion of focus group meeting results to develop recommendations. Includes financial impact of proposed incentives. December 2001 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board review of staff recommendations. February 2002 City Council review and consideration of proposed incentives. .. rppligIgIgg� Plan Leader: Eric Ploeger, Asst. Parks and Recreation Director Summary: Develop a plan for a phased implementation of Veterans Park and Athletic Complex, including cost estimate. Actual completion dates will be dependent on financial resources available. Policy Change: Increase the schedule for full development of the Veterans Park Faster Plan. Resources: PARD staff, fiscal services staff, and O'Malley Engineers. Key Milestones: July 2001 Submit facility name recommendations to City Council. September 2001 Award bid on Veterans Park and Athletic Complex, Phase 1 project. October 2001 Complete needs assessment for softball and soccer programs over the next ten years. (Peter LaMont) February 2002 Complete Phase recommendations and cost estimates and present to City Council. 15` Quarter 2003 Complete Phase I Construction. c. Improve subdivision ordinance as it relates to Parkland location and Parkland Dedication approval process. Plan Leader: Eric Ploeger, Asst. Parks and Recreation Director Summary: Examine subdivision ordinance as it relates to parkland location and parkland dedication approval process and recommend improvements. Policy Change: Potential change in parkland dedication acceptance process, including Planning & Zoning Commission to guide this process, and the Parks and 34 Resources: Key Milestones: June 2001 August 2001 September 2001 October 2001 November 2001 January 2002 February 2002 Recreation Advisory Board. Potential development of parkland acceptance policy. Existing staff and funds. Staff review of internal parkland acceptance process. Unified development code presentation and policy direction for Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, and staff. Focus Group to meet with developers to review draft changes in the Parkland Dedication Ordinance. Staff completes draft revisions to Parkland Dedication Ordinance; Parks and Recreation Advisory Board takes action on Dedication Ordinance revisions. Planning & Zoning Commission takes action on Parkland Dedication Ordinance revisions. City Council consideration of revisions to the Parkland Dedication Ordinance. level®%i �str Para„#or »eorniret'ar�crfe cadue�t 1araTA sr .. ... �... .. Plan Leader: Eric Ploeger, Asst. Parks and Recreation Director Summary: Develop a master plan for the current landfill and the new community park on Rock Prairie Road, adjacent to the landfill as it relates to a small area plan. Policy Change: None. Resources: Parks Planning, GIS Information Key Milestones: November 2001 Develop facility needs for the new Community Park to serve the southern portion of the City. February 2002 Submit facility needs for possible inclusion in the new 5-year CIP Plan. Summer 2003 Present conceptual Master Plan to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Fall 2003 Complete conceptual Master Plan and present it to the City Council. Implementation Plans Plan Leader: Marci Rodgers, Senior Services Coordinator Summary: Explore the recommendations from the Eisenhower Leadership Development report, and conduct a survey to determine feasibility and potential for joint projects with governmental, business, and not -for -profit organizations. Develop facility alternatives and recommendations to include capital and operating costs. Policy Change: Develop policies regarding future programs and facilities to meet the needs of senior populations in the community. Resources: Parks and Recreation Department Staff; Community Development Department. 35 Key Milestones: August 2001 Complete investigation of potential grant opportunities. November 2001 Complete survey of senior citizens and presentation report to City Council. November 2002 Conduct discussions with the City of Bryan and Brazos County to determine their interest in joint projects related to senior programs and facilities. December 2002 Develop financial impact analysis for recommended programs and facilities. January 2002 Presentation to Council and receive direction concerning recommendations for programs and facilities. January 2002 Seek commitment from agencies regarding programs and/or facilities based upon Council direction. February 2002 CIP list to budget. Pre ark feasi#�o/® e'e aet ® s>eb®ardpar� ., Plan Leader: Peter LaMount, Recreation Superintendent Summary: Develop a recommendation to the City Council on the potential financing, construction, and operation of a skate park facility. This is a long-term plan. Policy Change: None. Resources: Staff time, capital funding, and operational funding. Key Milestones: October 2001 Complete surveys of other municipal -operated skate parks for details of design and operation. November 2001 Develop recommendations for operation, construction, maintenance and funding for Council consideration. February 2002 Submit development costs for 5-year CIP based on City Council direction. January 2003 Develop implementation schedule based on November 2002 bond election. Implementation Plans Plan Leader: Linda Piwonka, Director of Technology Information Services Summary: Currently the Council funds $20,400 per year for the Art in Public Places Program. The program is administered through the Arts Council, which has expressed desire to obtain representative sculptural artwork for location within College Station. Policy change: Policy consideration would include possible change in the funding levels provided to enhance art in public places program as well as possible changes in the budget allocations for public facilities art during the construction of these facilities. Resources: The Council has approved $20,400 annually, implementation of this plan may require an additional $50,000 annually to purchase representative works to be located in College Station. Additional funding allocation for art in capital projects for public facilities. This amount would be guided by policy adopted by Council. Key Milestones: 36 September 2001 Council Consideration of ongoing funding increase for Art in Public places Program to purchase representative sculpture artwork in College Station. October 2001 Present proposed selection process to acquire representative work for College Station to Council for approval. November 2001 Begin selection of work for purchase in FY02 December 2001 Presentation, discussion, and possible action by Council regarding a change in policy establishing capital funding for public facilities. Consider change of policy to include funding allocation for public art as a part of construction costs Implementation Plans Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Public Works Director Summary: Continue the implementation of the Wolf Pen Creek Masterplan. This is a short-term plan. Policy change: May accelerate debt issuance to finance projects within this TIF. Resources: Drainage utility funds, GOB '95 funds, Parkland Dedication Funds, WPC TIF funds August 2001 Review WPC TIF capital budget. September 2001 Revise zoning ordinance regarding dedication of land for WPC development September 2001 Complete lower trail design December 2001 Begin construction of phase I trails December 2002 Complete channel design Construct future trail proiects, as funds are available �r�pl i»�r►t�c�e �ransir�aaFrn�poj�t`�� ,a$ta,�t i�� fiatr�e o°°%� �" i�i�q �r���� per ��$ Plan Leader: Eric Ploeger, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Summary: Provide pedestrian connections between parks, greenways, and residential areas including Lick Creek Park, Pebble Creek Park, Bee Creek park, Lemontree Park, Central Park, and Veterans Park and Athletic Complex. Policy Change: Provide linkage between greenways and parks to provide access for pedestrians and cyclists. Resources: Staff time, Lick Creek Park Development Funds ('98 Bond), Business Park Landscaping Funds. Key Milestones: July 2001 Complete Phase 1 of the bike loop project in Central, Bee Creek, and Lemontree Parks. August 2001 Link Pebble Creek Park to the Business Park during Phase II of the Business Park Landscaping Project. October 2002 Utilize existing bond funds and Trails Grant funds for Lick Creek Park trails development, to include connection with Pebble Creek Parkway. 37 November 2002 Complete trail section in Veterans Park and Athletic Complex. Applied for grant. Implementation Plans a. Facilitate better communication between the City Council, Parks & Recreation Advisory Board and the Planning & Zoning Commission. Plan Leader: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks and Recreation Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services Summary: Identify and coordinate key areas of interest for these two appointed boards and set goals accordingly. Policy Change: No current policy exists, new policy may be developed. Resources: Existing staff, funds, and appointed members. Key Milestones: July 2001 Board and Commission members' orientation by City Council. July 2001 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board presentation and discussion of Council Vision Statements and Implementation Plans. July 2001 Planning and Zoning Commission presentation and discussion of Council Vision Statements and Implementation Plans. August 2001 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Planning and Zoning Commission each identify areas of potential common interest September 2001 Joint meeting with Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Planning and Zoning Commission to set goals. November 2001 Joint meeting with City Council to confirm goals. 38 Tision Statement-45 Participate and Contribute to the Well Being of Our Community Vision Statemmnt#5 As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from participating and contributing to the well being of our community. Stratmgy#1 To facilitate citizen participation, we will pursue methods of civic involvement Implementation Plans a. Utilize citizen survey tnenhance civic involvement b. Neighborhood Involvement o. Increase voter turnout d. Citizen involvement programs Stretegy#2 Toincrease communication and citizen involvement, vvewill facilitate neighborhood association development Implementation Plans CommunityTision Statement #5 Participate and Contribute to the Well Being of Our As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from participating and contributing to the well being of our community. ® Efficient access to information and ® Advisory boards and committees services via technology and media. ® Focus Groups ® Volunteer programs ® Community education programs Resources: No additional resources needed, current resources for survey are $8,100 December 2001 Complete review of current citizen survey instrument April 2002 Conduct revised citizen survey June 2002 Review Citizen Survey Results August 2002 Utilize survey information to implement ways to encourage civic involvement. Plan Leader: Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services. Summary: This is a short-term plan reflecting this FY's implementation of an ongoing neighborhood planning program to facilitate citizen input and participation in developing improvement plans for neighborhoods. Policy change: No policy change is required as this is an annual implementation of an ongoing program. Resources: Current resources will be used to implement this plan Key Milestones: Continue to solicit input and participation from residents as oart of the current College Hills area neighborhood planning process. May 2001 Conduct public opinion survey to determine need for public improvements and neighborhood plans for the College Hills Planning area. June 2001 Hold public meeting to receive neighborhood input on possible area improvements, programs and services. August 2001 College Hills area Citizen's Planning Team to prepare final recommendations for area improvements, programs and priorities. October 2001 College Hills area neighborhood plan presented to P&Z for recommendations to Council . 40 ParticipateVision Statement #5 o' to the Well Being of Our Community November 2001 College Hills area neighborhood plan presented to Council for adoption, including implementation plan. Ireasevoterturnout z Plan Leader: Connie Hooks, City Secretary Summary: To recruit new voters and increase overall turnout to city elections, we will proactively look at methods to encourage citizens to the polls on election day. This is a medium term plan. Policy Change: None Resources: Current budget does not provide resources for added early voting locations or printed media to voters. Key Milestones: October 2001 Review county redistricting plan and determine new election precincts. December 2001 Recommend new polling places to council and additional early voting site. January 2002 Focus group with citizen university graduates for input on issue. Kids Voting Campaign. March 2002 Publish election information in Utility Bill inserts. June 2002 Evaluate election results in light of increasing voter turnout. ct . 'rtBerrrerrt>1'roges,„ " Plan Leader: Glenn Brown, Assistant City Manager Policy Change: NIA ;Resources: Resources for these programs at their current levels are already included within each responsible department's budgets and include the use of existing staff to maintain the programs. Teen Court is run completely with volunteers and one paid staff person. Increased use of graduates or participants of these various programs to promote and motivate additional citizen involvement and to operate the programs appears to be a viable way to increase participation and interest. Key Milestones: Fall 2001 Complete twenty-ninth Citizen's Police Academy. 2002 Monthly Mayor's Brunch. April 2002 Complete fifth Citizen's University. May 2002 Complete third Citizen's Fire Academy. June 2002 Complete fourth year of Teen Court. 41 ParticipateVision Statement #5 • Contribute to the Well Being of Our Community Implementation Plans a. Assist in the formation of neighborhood associations. Plan Leader: Jim Gallaway, Director of Development Services. Summary: This short-term plan is intended to supplement the Neighborhood Services ongoing support of neighborhood association formation. A "first annual" neighborhood conference will be held. This conference will provide education and support for neighborhood improvement and empowerment programs, including formation and operation of neighborhood association. Policy Change: There is no formally adopted policy with respect to this issue Resources: The FY 00-01 budget provides funds for this plan. Key Milestones: June 2001 Prepare draft conference program, coordinate facilitators. July 2001 Initiate conference registration. August 2001 Print final program materials, coordinate facilities, order supplies, etc. September 2001 Hold conference. 42 Vision Statement #6 As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from easily traveling to, within and from the community. Strategy #1 To facilitate travel to, from, and within the community, we will maintain a current thoroughfare plan Implementation Plans a. Complete currently approved street capital projects b. Develop short term new street capital program c. Update thoroughfare plan through small area planning process Strategy #2 To provide for future transportation needs, we will participate in regional and intermodal transportation planning Implementation Flans a. Participate in multi -agency regional transportation planning Strategy #3 To improve our bike/pedestrian friendliness, we will construct and maintain bike/pedestrian infrastructure Implementation Plans a. Sidewalk retrofit program b. Bikeway plan update c. Bike loop expansion project d. Existing bike loop project phase III Strategy #4 To improve rider convenience, reliability, and accessibility for citizens, we will improve the public transit system Implementation Plans a. Take action on Dean International recommendations to improve the mass transit system. 43 As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from easily traveling to, within and from the community. ® Well maintained and clean streets, ® Traffic flow sidewalks and pedestrian paths ® Air/rail ® Public Transit Thoroughfare plan lmolementation Plans a`Cofaapl0teiientA�.a/?pr®va�....:..i?etal p��jects. . 0.2 .. , .,. .., .. , . Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Expedite all currently budgeted street projects. Projects are considered short term. Policy change: None identified Resources: Additional land acquisition efforts are required to allow those projects with completed design plans to reach bid advertisement. Key Milestones: July 2001 Determine status of each project, set priorities and establish schedules for bringing projects to resolution. A continuous effort to force advancement of each project is necessary with yy individual projects having variousZ „timelines. Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Public Works Director Summary: Compilation of short term Capital Improvements Program to address existing CIP needs before the next bond issue. Policy change: Add new projects to the list of authorized capital improvement projects Resources: Funding must be identified. Additional Project Management Staff and/or outside Project Management may be required. May also require additional land acquisition effort. Key Milestones: June 28, 2001 Submit project list and cost estimates to Council for approval October 2001 Adopt schedule for the implementation of approved projects c,x��L6pcifa%ftfaaiYofrghfae��alaf�r�tigias►$ta��aPea,pl�ra�afe�gpr°oc�ss,�� � ..,?��,� �:.�.._��4 �� Plan Leader: Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services. 44 Summary: This implementation plan focuses on the use if the small area planning approach for maintaining the City's thoroughfare plan. While this is a long term, ongoing program, this plan focuses on the program for the current FY. Policy Change: There is no policy change required. Resources: Current resources will be used to implement the plan for this FY Key Milestones: September 2001 Identify and review area thoroughfare alternatives October 2001 P&Z subcommittee review of thoroughfare and land use alternatives. November 2001 Public meeting for area property owner, citizen input. November 2001 Draft plan review by P&Z subcommittee. January 2002 Final plan presented to P&Z for adoption. Larch 2002 Final plan presented to Council with resolution to amend comprehensive plan. Implementation Plans Plan Leader: Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services. Summary: Regional transportation planning is typically a very long rang process, with time frames and horizons that range from ten to twenty years. Regional transportation planning in College Station includes ongoing participation in interagency planning with organizations such as the local Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Brazos Valley Council of Governments. This implementation plan focuses on short-term activities to review current planning efforts, identification of opportunities for increased regional planning efforts and the development of policy related to College Station's participation in regional transportation. This plan also includes ongoing participation in the railroad relocation study currently being conducted by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. Policy Change: There is no current formally adopted policy related to regional transportation planning. This plan is intended to lead to the development of a local policy position on this issue. Resources: Current resources will be used to implement this plan. Additional resources may be required to change levels of participation in the future. Key Milestones: Continue participation in the MPO rail relocation study October 2001 Provide quarterly update to Council. January 2002 Provide quarterly update to Council. April 2002 Provide quarterly update to Council. July 2002 Provide quarterly update to Council. Facilitate a regional transportation visioning program throuoh Dean International and the Brazos Vallev Council of Governments. November 2001 Target date for regional transportation visioning process kickoff. 11R Vision Statement #6 Easily Travel To, Within and From the Community Implementation Plans Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Develop a plan for retrofitting sidewalks in older neighborhoods. This implementation plan is considered short term. Policy change: Current policy provides for petitions to be submitted requesting sidewalk construction however petitions are not being submitted. Consider changing the policy to identify and implement retrofit projects through the Neighborhood Planning process. Resources: Identify new sources for sidewalk funding for future sidewalk additions. Key Milestones: August 2001 Develop new sidewalk retrofit policy involving Neighborhood Planning. October 2001 Policy discussion with City Council November 2001 Amend ordinances to reflect new policy #� �ekeWaypiara Plan Leader: Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services Summary: This is a short-term plan to provide for the update and maintenance of the City's bikeway master plan. Policy Change: No policy change is required. Resources: Current resources will be used to implement this plan. Key Milestones: January 2002 Review current bikeway master plan for changed conditions, gaps, needs for additional facilities. February 2002 Public meeting with users groups, development interests and citizens. March 2001 Preliminary recommendations to Parks and Recreation Board, P&Z for comments. April 2002 Final recommendations to Parks, P&Z for approval. June 2002 Updated plan with resolution to amend comprehensive plan to Council. Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Develop a multi modal trail facility that connects East By -Pass neighborhoods with the bike loop project that is currently under development. Policy Change: None. Resources: TEA 21 grant, Greensway acquisition funds Key Milestones: June 14, 2001 Council adoption of resolution supporting TEA 21 grant application June 18, 2001 Grant application submitted to TxDOT for consideration 46 117111111 Award of construction is expected within eighteen months of award of grant with the construction schedule to require twelve months after bid award. See grant application for project time line. d. Existing bike loop project Phase ill Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Complete the portion of the Bike Loop Project that provides for a connection between Bee Creek Park and Cy Miller Park via the Arboretum and under Texas Avenue. This implementation plan is considered to be short term. Policy change: done identified Resources: Additional funding, beyond that remaining from Phases I & 11, is anticipated in order to complete the existing bike loop along Bee Creek and through the box culverts under Texas Avenue. Key Milestones: October 2001 Approval of the Bee Creek drainage plans by the Corps of Engineers. August 2002 Estimated date for completion of the Bee Creek drainage improvements. October 2002 Phase III of the Bike Loop project to be bid June 2003 Completion of the Phase III of the Bike Loop project Implementation Plans a ;Take. action on ®eara ,International recommendations to improve the brass transit system Plan Leader: Glenn Brown, Assistant City manager Summary: Dean International, Inc., Public Policy Transportation Consultants have been hired to review and recommend enhancements for many of the City's transportation related programs. Dean International will also work with the City of College Station as an advocate for funding transportation related programs for the City through contacts in Austin and Washington DC. Dean International is currently reviewing the mass transit needs of College Station and the overall operations of Brazos Transit, and will make recommendations accordingly. Policy Change: The City is taking a more proactive role in evaluating the effectiveness of mass transit service in College Station. Resources: Budgeted Funds for Dean International and City Staff Key Milestones: October 2001 Dean International presents report and recommendations at a Regular City Council Meeting December 2001 Staff and City Council complete evaluation of Dean report and answer any remaining questions December 2001 Council provides direction to staff regarding mass transit for College Station April 2002 Council considers a staff -prepared action plan to implement Councils direction for change. 47 Vision Statement #7 As a result of our efforts citizens will contribute to and benefit from living in a strong and diverse economic environment. Strategy #1 To increase the diversity of our economy, we will be proactively involved in a regional approach to airport/air transportation Implementation Plans a. Take action on Dean International regional airport/air transportation recommendations Strategy #2 To maintain and grove our sales tax base, we will proactively recruit retail businesses Implementation Plans a. Conduct marketing activities to targeted retail and commercial businesses b. Evaluate availability of retail sites and infrastructure Strategy #3 To Provide Adequate Economic Opportunity for Our Citizens, we will Promote Economic Development Implementation Plans a. Develop new class "A" park b. Develop new class "B" park c. Develop economic development plan for 4B Board d. List business center land with commercial real estate Strategy #44 To enhance College Station's tourism economy, we will evaluate policies directing the growth of this industry Implementation Plans a. Implement consultant study of CVB project b. Develop Hotel Conference Center project c. Work with CVB to develop targeted marketing plan for Hotel Conference Center 48 ill! �1 r#` F11• .11.In l�,•t., As a result of our efforts citizens will contribute to and benefit from living in a strong and diverse economic environment. • Economic development compatible with community values • Protection of property values • Tourism, conventions • Adequate transportation Implementation Plans • Business center • Strong retail • Job opportunities • Reasonable cost of living Plan Leader: Glenn Brown, Assistant City Manager Summary: Dean International is reviewing the airport/air transportation needs of College Station. At this time they are especially focused on the need for a regional airport, and Texas A&M's recent announcement of their desire leave the airport operations business. Dean International will make recommendations specifically for College Station, but any action taken will also impact/include Bryan and Brazos County. (Also see summary comments from Vision 6, Strategy 4-1). Policy Change: The City of College Station will take a leadership role in ensuring that airport and air transportation services not only continue, but will be enhanced for the entire Brazos Valley area. Resources: Budgeted funds for Dean International, City staff, cooperative efforts with Bryan, Brazos County, and Texas A&M. Key Milestones: August 2001 Dean International presents their Airport report and recommendations at a regular City Council Meeting. September 2001 Complete evaluation of Dean recommendations and coordination with other affected governments. This evaluation will include a joint meeting with the Bryan City Council and possibly the Brazos Commissioners Court. October 2001 College Station City Council provides direction to City staff to develop an action plan to ensure the local economy stays strong during any potential change in airport operations. November 2001 City Staff complete a more detailed implementation plan based on City Council direction. Implementation Plans a ���„�diac�jei�arl�etrn �cira+rt%s to�iar" eteilre�iailan�r�f� �mmercral.busr;�esses � � �� ``� `' 49 Plan Leader: Kim Foutz, Director of Economic Development Summary: Develop initial and follow-up marketing materials, tools, and methods for direct marketing to prospective retail and commercial businesses. Policy change: This is a continuation of the existing policy to promote retail development. Resources: Additional resources will be needed to accomplish this plan. Marketing materials development, design, and printing of $40,000 (general city brochure - $20,000; business park brochure(s) - $6,000; specific follow -up marketing pieces - $5,000; video/cd - $10,000). Key Milestones: September 2001 Publish primary marketing piece September 2001 Economic development web page on-line October 2001 Develop a target business list approved by 4B Board November 2001 Begin direct mail -outs to targeted businesses February 2002 Publish additional specialized retail marketing materials Plan Leader: Kim Foutz, Director of Economic Development Summary: Evaluate number, availability and suitability of existing retail tracts and its influence on retail location decisions. Sites will also be evaluated regarding sufficiency of infrastructure to support development. Economic Development staff and 4B board will work with the Planning and Zoning Commission to address any shortfalls. Policy change: This is a continuation of the existing policy, however this takes a more proactive approach by evaluating basic requirements in advance of development and taking steps such as rezoning and infrastructure enhancements to influence retail location decisions. Resources: Existing staff, 4B Board, and Planning and Zoning Commission members will accomplish this plan. No additional monetary resources are necessary. February 2002 Finalize identification of available sites April 2002 Complete evaluation of infrastructure and development constraints for existing sites May 2002 Identify additional sites for retail/commercial purposes July 2002 Initiate rezoning process, if applicable 50 Implementation Plans a _Develop crew,Class �`" Busrrtess Park � ..�_ _ .... Plan Leader: Kim Foutz, Director of Economic Development Summary: Develop a future business park in College Station to increase the diversity of the College Station economy. The park is designed specifically to target information/technology companies in a high -end, park -like setting. Park development includes master planning, engineering, and development. Land acquisition is complete. Policy change: This is a continuation of the existing policy to diversify our economy by providing sufficient Class "A" light industrial locations and incentives for companies. Resources: In FY'01, 340 acres of Class "A" business center park land was acquired at a cost of $3,796,910 (less 118 acres of greenway acquisition costs). In addition, approximately 37 additional acres will be acquired in FY01 to enhance the park's Highway 6 frontage and area suitable for large users ($1,000,000). Master planning will occur in FY01-02 and $125,000 was allocated for this purpose. In FY '02, funding for phase I engineering will be needed ($225,000). Proposed funding for Phase I development in '03 includes using various enterprise funds and certificate of obligation of $2,275,000. Key Milestones: July 2001 Recommend new concept for covenants and restrictions to City Council June 2002 Complete master plan and covenants for site December 2002 Complete Phase I engineering plans for site December 2003 Complete Phase I development of site Plan Leader: Kim Foutz, Director of Economic Development Summary: Develop a future business park in College Station, through a public/private partnership to increase the diversity of the College Station economy. Park development includes master planning, engineering, and development of infrastructure by the City. The private partner will develop spec buildings for each phase of the park. Once Phase I is complete, additional phased development will occur in conjunction with demand for the site and associated buildings. Policy change: This is a continuation of the existing policy to diversify our economy by providing sufficient alternative light industrial locations and incentives for companies. However, this approach is somewhat different because it does not involve acquisition and ownership of land by the City. Resources: Since this is a public/private partnership, acquisition of land by the City is not anticipated for this project. Master planning begins in FY01 and $10,000 in economic development funds are allocated for this purpose. Additional resources are needed for engineering in FY '02. Proposed funding is 51 $3,500,000 over three years (FY '02-04) for this phased project and will include utilization of both utility enterprise funds and certificate of obligations. It is anticipated that the City will pursue Tax Increment Financing with the County for this project_ Key Milestones: December 2001 Complete proposed master plan for site December 2001 Complete proposed deed restrictions for site February 2002 Planning & Zoning Commission consideration of rezoning request May 2002 Complete Phase I engineering plans for site February 2003 Complete Phase I development of site :NXUA Plan Leader: Kim Foutz, Director of Economic Development Summary: The Bylaws of the College Station Business Development Corporation (4B Corp) require that an overall economic development plan be developed for the City. This plan will be specifically targeted at activities and responsibilities of the 4B Corporation only. Policy change: This is a continuation of policy to develop economic development policies and programs. Resources: Existing staff resources will be utilized in conjunction with 413 Board input. However, additional resources are needed to hire a facilitator for strategic planning sessions. Key Milestones: November 2001 Complete research on other 4B Corporation plans November 2001 Hire facilitator to begin strategic plan meetings June 2002 Develop draft of economic development plan Sept 2002 Submit draft plan to City Council for approval Plan Leader: Kim Foutz, Director of Economic Development Summary: This plan involves listing the City's existing business center and new business center land with a nationally recognized commercial real estate firm. This will provide additional exposure and marketing of the business park. Policy change: Policy change includes involving outside parties in the marketing of our community and resources. Resources: No additional resources will be needed. In many cases, proceeds from the sale of land in the business parks will be utilized to pay associated broker fees. However, additional resources may be needed on individual land sales. Key Milestones: November 2001 Develop Request for Proposals February 2002 City Council selects proposal May 2002 Sign contract with real estate firm 52 Implementation Plans Plan Leader: Charles Cryan, Fiscal Services Director Summary: Randal Travel Marketing prepared and presented a marketing and organizational study of the Bryan/College Station Convention and Visitors Bureau. The study, including recommendations, were presented to the community and the Chamber Board in April, 2001. The study included a number of significant recommendations and implementation of the recommendations is a priority of the College Station City Council and work plan for FY 2002. Policy change: Staff received direction from the City Council to develop a process to establish the CVB as a stand alone organization. Resources: The City provides approximately $650,000 in funding for the operations of the CVB, a building and has made a grant application to provide a new site for the offices and a visitor center along with an additional $500,000 as a match for the grant. Key Milestones: June 14, 2001 City Council received the Randal study and recommendations for the CVB. July 2001 Meet with the City of Bryan and Brazos County to determine their desire to fund and participate in the governance of a stand alone CVB. August 2001 Report findings regarding the willingness of Brazos County and the City of Bryan to partner with College Station to fund and provide governance for the CVB. August 2001 Identify additional stakeholders who wish to partner with College Station to provide direction and develop a new direction and focus for the CVB. Appoint a taskforce to work with city staff to prepare bylaws and articles of incorporation for a stand-alone CVB. October 2001 Present draft bylaws and articles of incorporation to each of the governing bodies that wish to participate as partners in governing a separate CVB for review and adoption. 2001 Appoint a taskforce to select an executive director for the CVB. `November October 2002 Full separation between the B/CS Chamber of Commerce and the CVB. ?D�At�t/orfeie aCeRted £'Je��._ ,� ,. ��° _ , n .r ,. z Plan Leader: Kim Foutz, Director of Economic Development Summary: This plan involves continued development of a conference center and full service hotel adjacent to a new corporate office and performing arts center. This project is intended to develop College Station's tourism economy and sales tax base. Policy Change: This is a continuation of past and current Council policies. Resources: The City has already issued $5,500,000 in Certificate of Obligation debt, $600,000 in Hotel/Motel funds, and $500,000 in electric funds for construction and equipping of the conference center. An additional $5,400,000 in Certificate of Obligation debt for the conference center is needed for a total facility cost of $12,000,000. In addition, the City will fund 53 $1,015,000 from its Water/Wastewater Fund and $2,585,000 from its Electric and Water Fund for off -site infrastructure improvements. It is anticipated that the City will pursue Tax Increment Financing with the County for this project. Key Milestones: September 2001 Finalize draft concept plan and preliminary budget November 2001 Finalize all initial agreements December 2001 Close on conference center site March 2001 Finalize Tax Increment Financing documents April 2002 Design completion and groundbreaking February 2004 Construction completion and grand opening o..;'!IlorAcffa�if,tod��!elop�rget��at�%��tartg,lafori�ofedcpnfer�nc�,cetsfer.. �>,r ,:....,. Plan Leader: Charles Cryan/Kim Foutz Summary: Marketing of the proposed hotel/conference center. The city is working with TAC to develop and construct a hotel/conference center. The conference center is projected to cost $12 million to design and construct. It is anticipated that debt service for the project will come from a TIF and hotel/motel taxes on the hotel associated with the conference center. It is anticipated that the construction will be complete during the spring or summer of 2004. in order for the conference center to be a success, it is important to develop an effective marketing plan to supplement the efforts of the hotel owner and hotel/conference center operator. Policy change: Close working relationship between the CVB and city staff to develop a marketing plan to book events, conferences, etc. in the planned Conference Center. Resources: The City provides approximately $650,000 in funding for the operations of the CVB, and is engaged in developing a public/private venture to build a hotel/conference center to increase tourism in the City of College Station. Key Milestones: September 2001 Council consideration and action on proposed contracts with TAC, and others, to build a hotel and to operate a conference for the City of College Station. October 2001 City staff meet with CVB staff to lay out the time frame for construction and completion of the College Station Conference/Convention center and begin to develop a marketing strategy that will be coordinated with the conference center operator to book conferences, business meetings and conventions appropriate for the planned facility. March 2002 Complete design of the conference center May 2002 Council consideration and action on bids for a conference center. July 2002 Increase marketing efforts for the conference center. May 2003 Issue additional debt for Conference center project December 2003 Begin to planning for opening ceremonies for the conference center and continue booking events. 54 Vision Statement #8 As a result of our efforts citizens will live in well -planned neighborhoods suited to community interests and lifestyles. Strategy #1 To prevent residential decline and improve neighborhoods, we will create effective development policies Implementation Plans a. Develop policies and code requirements to require landscape maintenance in multi -family developments, require the transition from developer to HOA responsibility, and impact neighborhood layouts. b. Develop solutions that address decline in single family areas. c. Designate areas for historic lighting through the Eastgate neighborhood planning process. d. Investing in infrastructure rehab in older neighborhoods. Strategy #2 To ensure durable infrastructure that meets the community's needs, we will examine and improve our infrastructure construction standards Implementation Plans a. Implement new design and construction standards Strategy #3 To ensure well -planned neighborhoods, we will maintain and improve our Comprehensive Plan and development policies Implementation Plans a. Re-examine Northgate redevelopment plan b. Update comprehensive plan through small area planning M As a result of our • _itizens will live in well -planned neighborhoods suited to communityn • Village concept Gentrification of older neighborhoods Planning/Zoning lmDlernentation Plans • Neighborhood parks for multi - generation use • Traffic management • Pedestrian mobility Plan Leader: Jim Callaway, Development Services Director Summary: This implementation plan is a short-term approach to addressing a number of neighborhood quality issues. The plan provides for three different approaches in the strategy. One is to address development standards and issues through the ongoing UDC project. The topics addressed are carried over from last year's Strategic Plan. UDC standards will impact new development (infill and redevelopment) more so than existing structures and land uses. Additional work is included to address current property through property maintenance standards, etc. A second part of this strategy is to consider the possible policy changes with respect to enforcement of property maintenance related codes. The third part of the strategy addresses appearance through the use of antique style lighting. This approach will be implemented through the neighborhood planning program. Policy Change: Policy changes will have to be considered. This will include assessment of changes in property maintenance standards and enforcement policies (proactive vs reactive enforcement) Resources: Current resources will be used to implement this plan. Additional resources or changes in service levels of current services will be required to change enforcement policies. Key Milestones: Develop codes and standards throuoh UDC moiect July 2001 Joint Workshops with Council — P&Z review committees September 2001 Review draft UDC made available to public November 2001 P&Z public hearings December 2001 Council public hearings January 2002 Council adopt UDC 56 Review orooertv standard codes. enforcement policies. consider oolicv alternatives October 2001 Present and review findings, alternate property standard code Desionate areas for antique decorative liahtina through the eastaate neighborhood olannino orooram May 2001 Conduct public opinion survey to determine need for public improvements and neighborhood plans for the College Hills Planning area. June 2001 Hold public meeting to receive neighborhood input on possible area improvements, programs and services. August 2001 College Hills area Citizen's Planning Team to prepare final recommendations for area improvements, programs and priorities. October 2001 College Hills area neighborhood plan presented to P&Z for recommendations to Council. November 2001 College Hills area neighborhood plan presented to Council for adoption, including implementation plan. Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Develop a Master Plan to identify those areas within the City in need of street, drainage, and utility rehabilitation work. The plan should address possible redevelopment uses and road closures in Northgate. This implementation is considered short term. Review results of rehabilitation of Northgate Plan and make adjustments as necessary. Policy change: None identified Resources: Identify new funding sources to develop the Master Plan and specific rehabilitation projects. $721,325 in Community Development Funds are proposed for Northgate Street Improvement. $202,000 in Residential Rehab Funds, and $90,000 in Thoroughfare Rehab Funds are proposed for Northgate Street Projects/ August 2001 Complete development of Northgate infrastructure rehab plan. Council consider CD budget — possible Northgate street rehab. October 2001 Complete construction of Eastgate Rehab Phase II&III December 2001 Evaluate results of Eastgate Rehab II&III March 2002 Evaluate results of Northgate infrastructure rehab plan. June 2002 Present citywide Rehab Master Plan with CIP budget. Implementation Plans Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: On March 8, 2001 a presentation was made to the council concerning street structural standards and Right -Of Way standards and recommend changes aimed at improving pavement conditions, reducing maintenance costs and providing adequate right-of-way for street, sidewalk and utility development. This presentation was made a part of a council strategic issue. As a result of 57 this meeting staff was directed to meet with the development community to discuss the proposed standards. This is a continuation of the effort to rewrite the City's standard specifications and develop new design guidelines to establish minimum requirements for street, drainage, water and sewer. This implementation is considered short term. Policy change: It is anticipated that the standard specifications and design guidelines would be adopted by administrative action, after review and comment by the City Council, and that reference to these documents would be included in the new development code currently under development. Resources: The Engineering staff is expected in order to create design guidelines and rewrite the standard specifications. Key Milestones: December 2001 Completion of draft documents for review and comment. June 2002 Meet with development community for review and comment October 2002 Present revised standards to City Council in a workshop setting. December 2002 Adoption of revised standards. Implementation Plans A Re4enaryarne �l rthgate�`etleve�opie�# jilt Plan Leader: Kim Foutz, Economic Development Director Jim Callaway, Development Services Director Summary: Review the 1996 Northgate Redevelopment Plan and make revisions. This is a medium term plan. Policy Change: Past goals, objectives, and redevelopment strategies for this plan need to be reviewed and changes should be made to the plan to reflect new conditions, and current and projected needs for the Northgate area. Resources: Existing staff time and $62,500 ($37,500 City, $25,000 TAMU/Northgate merchants) in consulting resources. Key Milestones: September 2001 Finalize draft concept plan and preliminary budget November 2001 Finalize all initial agreements December 2001 Close on conference center site March 2001 Finalize Tax Increment Financing documents April 2002 Design completion and groundbreaking February 2004 Construction completion and grand opening b pc�a% omp hen CAM M49P I a10 area plan►spi g' 3 ' . , z x .. �. fr ., Plan Leader: Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services Summary: This plan provides for a short-term strategy for establishing an ongoing program for maintaining and implementing the City's comprehensive plan. Part of the strategy will be to use the small area planning process to update the plan on an area basis. Small area planning projects will focus on portions of the City with more critical needs for updates. The neighborhood- U-1 planning program will supplement the update process, focusing on established areas and developing implementation plans. Reviews and updates of key elements of the plan, such as bikeway plans, thoroughfare plans, etc., will also be used as part of the process for updating and implementing the plan. Although this plan provides for a short-term strategy, the actual process of updating and implementing will become a long-term, ongoing activity. Policy Change: No policy change is required. Resources: Current resources will be used to implement this plan. Those resources include existing and new positions. Two of these are currently vacant with recruitment underway. In some cases, supplemental resources, such as consultants, may be used. Key Milestones: November 2001 Complete Neighborhood Plan for College Hills area. January 2002 Complete Business Center Small Area Planning Project January 2002 Complete Bikeway Master Plan update and expansion. 59 STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES Existing Resources New Resources Grand Total All CapitalCapital O&M �} Total Capital O&M Resources Notes E. STRATEGY #, P:R(DTI'I G:AND QI!:Tti O&M Total , .; a. Legislative Plan 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt b. Review of Fiscal and Budgetary Policies 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt c. Sell Property with no TOTAL #1 value 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt. ISTRATEGY 0 ExSt ., ,_ ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt STItAYEGV*140 TIN(JA.I P,ARTiCiPATdQN.TIC=INI)Eli(O R 14,�1�T+ITA-a CQ 1-CATIUIY A ,.. , � .�oft W" Ia. Develop intergovernmental wort. plan 0 ExSt ExStl 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt r ISTRATEGY#2 TOTAL 0J ExSt� ExSt l 0 0� Oq 0� ExSt ExSt� �: , 3.tiQ1LI7CATIa,G011M1YllT11�1IGA7Z?NAN DUEIEQIl�StSIIGCNI'�[. Ia. Continuous Improvement Team 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt Ib. Communications program 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0I 0 ExSt ExSt'' Ic. Review predevelopment meeting process 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt �+ ISTRATEGY#3 TOTAL 0 Exst ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt' .. H" 'i' ti. "g 8 1STRAIEQY#4:;MQ�'NPiTING',W0RK` NVIRONl1'IEN'I'� WI � 1151 �..., w.: .... -.. Ia. Monitor compensation plan j 0 0 01 0 1,876,848 1,876,848 0 1,876,848 1,876,848 b. Competetive benefit plan 0 0 0 0 644,000 644,0001 0 644,000 644,000 U ic. Promote employee development 0 ExSt ExStII 0 0 01 0 ExSt ExSt Id. Monitor and identify trensd in retention I 0 ExSt ExSd 0 OI 0 0 ExSt ExSt e. Employee reco ration 0 36,000 36,000 0 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 g 000 36,000� �0 , 2,520,848 I 2 520,848 ; 0 2,566,848 2,656,848 STRATEGY #4 TOTAL 0 36, � � � �- ... . � � � � �3 � . ��� STRATEGY #5:;CQMPETI'TIVE; REASONABI:E""E EC°Y" XC I°R$ 10 .Q�t i _. �� : , ._ , o� 0 0 c ISTRATEGY#5 TOTAL 0 100,000 100 000 0 100, 0 200 000 200 000 D00 100 000 a. Implement deregulation strategic plan 0 100 000 0 0 100 000 100 000 ISTI2A ECY.:#G: GiT9TO1VIERt1iVICI �a. Facilities Master Plan II 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 01 0 ExSt ExSt Ib. E GovtlTechnology Plan 242,000 0 OI 0 61,417 61,4171 242,000 61,417 303,417 �c.CityCenter Phase 1 1,560,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,560,000 0 1,560,000 d. New 5 Year CIP 0 Ex") t ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt ;STRATEGY#6TOTAL 1,802,000 EXSt ExSti 0 61,417 61,4171 1,802,000 61,417 1,863,417II vl3°I&9PATMERT 1 TON L3 jj 1,802,000 130,000 1,J3�OOf7'' 01 2,620,8481 2,620,84811 1,802,0001 2,818,265 4,620,265 � E)IS1 xistinq Staff Resources VISION S -MENT 1 STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES Existing Resources New Resources Grand Total All Capital O&M Yotal Capital O&M Total Capital O&M Resources t LOW ". G�.�.,•„r�`��'..n.:. ..W.0 Notes wo :a. Countywide fire station planning 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt 'b. Proactive station planningg 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0. 0 ExSt ExSt ® 'STRATEGY #1 TOTAL p 120,000 ExSt 120,000 0 0 0 120,000 0 120,000 ® 20,000 0 120,000 � 000 ExSt 120,000 c Enhance traffic pre-emption tion program ® ® ® 12®, n w a. Prepazation of annexation service plan Ex t Ex t 0 outside agencies . STRATEGY #2'TOTAL 0 ExSt ExSt 0 20 000 20,000 , 'a. Streetmazlungs 0 20,000 20,000' 0 20,000 20,000' 0 40,000 40,000 b. Red light running 0 0 0 0 34,759 34,759 0 34,759 34,759 d , c. Overall public safety/education plan 0 ExSt ExSt'; 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt A. Thoroughfare lighting 0 0 0 526,000 0 526,000 526,000 0 526,000 w e. Police accreditation _ 0 11,490 11,490 0 0 0 0 11,490 11,490 � If Police reserve program 0. ExSti ExSt 0 4,345 4,345 0 4,345 4,345 ri STRATEGY #3 TOTAL 0 31,490 31,490 526,000 59,104 565,104: 526,000 90,594 616,594 IM •, w a. Improve information and referral system 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt STRATEGY #4 TOTAL 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt ��S � a a. Multi -family recycling, recycling education 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt °-„ ;STRATEGY #5 TOTAL 0 1 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt > VISION STA TEMENT 2 TOTALS 120,000 31,490 151,490 526,000 79,1041 605,104 646,000 110,594 756,594 ExSt ® Existing Staff Resources VISION STATEMENT 2 STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES Existing Resources New Resources Grand Total All Capital O&M Total Capital O&M Total Capital O&M � Resources 81;1�� 11 , 11 1 W JM'ff0TRENQTHEr4kE NJU"10 ENDO MA :a. Enhance noise abatement enforcement 61,316 61,316 0 0 0 61,316 61,316 i 0 01 i1b. Enhance proactive code enforcement 0 ExSt ExSt � 0 0 0 i 0 ExSt ExSt 'STRATEGY0 TOTAL 0 61,316 61,3161 0 0 0 0 61,316 61,316 -e, w, iii wwwo- sionateng" 4- F-14 "M "m I'M, 1 1MOMMAN M, IMP U08�4�411EENWAYSYSTE LE ENTA:hOM*ON00j,0��,, 51, Ja. Complete Wolf Pen Creek Trails 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I jb. Greensway education plan ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 0 0 STRATEGY#2 TOTAL 01 0 01' 0 0 01 0 0 0 ae- a Mum. wxiw XINTAIN ST.OR ,ya : - _0 ag !, '- I, , M WATERIQUALI N ,& "s""'an" «ammnr% ;'a. Strategy for storm water quality reg. 01 ExSt j ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExStj ExSt E�STRATEGY#3 TOTAL 01 ExSt ExS 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt A Ia. Develp an urban forestry plan 01 ExStj ExSt 30,000 01 30,000 30,000 ExSt30000 0 I I b. Examine alternative fuel option 0 ExSt ExSt 0 00 00 ExSt ExSt STRATEGY #4 TOTA L 0 ExSt ExStil 30,0001 0 30,0030,00ExSt 30,0001 > JVI5IONSl-A'I'ENIEN'F3'1'0'1'ALS or 61,316 61,3169 210,0001 b 1 30,0001 30,6001 61,31611 91,3161 Notes ExSt -xisting Staff Resources VISION S ZMENT 3 STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES a. Intergenerational component in C11's 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt L STRATEGY #3 TOTAL ( 0 1 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt STRATEGY #4: `MAINTAIN COMPREHENSIVE PARKS PLANEIIVC c PROCESSES AIVI9 DOCUMENTATION O qa. Incentives for developers 0 ExSt ExSt1�, 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt wb. Implementation plan fbr Veteran's Park 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt e. Subdivision ordinance 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt d. New community park site and landfill 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt Q ExSt ExSt '- ExSt 0 0 0 0 STTRATEGY#STDEVELOP COMPREHENSIVE LEISURE6. ,a. Finish senior feasibility study 0 ExSt ExSt 0 5,000 5,000 01 5,000 5,000 'b. Feasibility report on skateboard park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U .STRATEGY #S 7.OT-1 L 0 ExSt ExSt 0 5,000 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 ,STRATEGY 96: EXPAND EXISTING PUBLIC ARTS PROGRAM a. Analysis ol'current art program 0 20,4001 20,400 50,000 0 50,00011 50,000 20,400 70,400 E ,b. Determine resources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STRATEGY#6 TOTAL 0 20,400 20,400 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 20,400 70,400 `n STRATEGY:47: CONNECT PARKS THROUGH GRIEENW-A;YSAND OTHER:OPP,O,R'} IJNITIES a. Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan 3,477,000 0 3,477,0001 4,800,000 0 4,800,000 8,277,000 0 8,277,000 > b. Greenway-park connectivity 200,000 ExSt� 200,0001 458,000 0 458,000 \ 658,000 ExSt 658,000 STRA TEGY # 7 TOTA L 3,677,000 ExSt� 3677,000 5,258,000 0 5,258,000, 8,935,000 ExSt 8,935,000 STRATEGY #S: INCREASE;COMMUNICF TIONS-BE EEty CI . :C.OUNCIL;°PARKS AAYI%ORY BOA. D, AND THE PLANNING"A11 � ZONING C')MMISSION a. Better communications between Boards 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt TItA"1'EGl' #8 TOTAL0 ExSf ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt VISIONS'I'A'I'ENIEN'1'#4'1'0"1'AI.S 3,677,000 20,400 3,697,400 25,308,0001 470,000 25,778,000 28,985,000 490,400 29,475,400 ExSt = Existing Staff Resources VISION STATEMENT -T",RA`JGEGY..#I:Ur,, �:,PURS,MF,T,HODS Ol tF) E- �a. Citizen Survey to enhance involvement c) lb. Neighborhood involvement e. Increase voter turnout (EU Id. Citizen involvement programs STRA TEG Y #I TOTAL coo Ia. Fonnation of'Neighborhood Assoc. ISTRATEGY #2 TOTAL U IVISION STATEMENT 5 TOTALS STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES Existing Resources I New Resources Capital 0 & M J Total Capital O&M I Total um 0 8,150 8,150 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExStj 0 0 0 0 8,150 8,1501 T: 0 ko A` 0 10,000 1 0,0001 01 0 1 01 01 10,0001 10,000 0 0 0 61 18,1501 1,8,1501 01 01 61 Grand Total All Capital 08'M Resources 0 8,150 8,1501 0 ExSt ExSt 0 ExSt ExSt 0 ExSt ExSt 0 8,150 8,150 0 100001 10,0001 01 10"000 10,000 01 18,1501 18,1501 Notes FY1.q .:Yi,,,tina Staff Resources VISION S -:MENT 5 Existing Resources Capital I O&M J Total STRATEGY #I: CURRENT STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES Now Resources Capital J O&M I Total Capital Grand Total All O&M Resources Notes a. Completion of'street capital projects 9,000,000 0 9,000,000 0 0 0 9,000,000 0 9,000,000 b. Short term ne�v street capital program 0 0 0' 9,000,000 0 9,000,000 9,000,000 0 9,000,000 c. Update thoroughfare plan 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt STRATEGY #1 TOTAL 9,000,000 ExSt 9,000,000 9,000,000 0 9,000,000 18,000,000 ExSt 18,000,000 STRATEGY #2: PARTICIPATE IN REGIONAL A:NDINTERMODAL TRANSPORTAT10NNING a Multi -agency transportation planning 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt B STRATEGY92TOTAL 01 ExStJ ExSt� OI 0 0� 0 ExSt ExSt l CONS R1JCT BIKElPEDESTItIAN NERASTRUCTIIRE1, STRATEEGY #3: AMID MAINTAIN, .,.....,.` a. Sidewalk retrofit program 500,000 ExSt ExSt 0 01 0 500,000 ExSt 500,000 b. Bikeway plan update 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt b c. Bike loop expansion project TBD ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 TBD ExSt ExSt 9 d. Exisiting bike loop project, phase III TBD ExSt ExSt 0 0 0; TBD ExSt ExSt STRATEGY#3 TOTAL 500,000 ExSt ExSt 01 0 0 500,000 ExSt 500,000 STRATEGY #4:IMPROVE PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM a. Dean International recommendations 0 240,0001 0 0 0 0 0 240,000 240,000 STRATEGY#4TOTAL 0 240,0001 0� 0 0 0� 0 240,000 240,000� VISION STA TEMENT 6 TOTALS 8 9, 500, 000 1240, 0001 9,000,000 � 9, 000, 0001 01 9,000,0001 18, 500, 0001 240,000 18, 740, 0001 ExST = Existing Staff Resources VISION STATEMENT 6 STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES Existing Resources New Resources Grand Total All Capital O&M Total Capital O&M Total Capital O&M Resources Notes M � .,. _. _ . _..«.. �: .... . ._ ,.. reY. +w.. . ,. ......... a.: ..... ... .� ...., !.,. ,..a .. , .., `... .. .. .... v.., e lid. ... a, a. Dean International recommendations 0 ExSt ExSd 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt o STRATEGY #1 TOTAL 0 ExSt ExSts 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt a. Marketing activities 0 0 01. 0 40,000 40,000 0 40,000 40,000 sue, b. Evaluate availability of retail sites 0 ExSt ExSt : 0 0 0 ` 0 ExSt ExSt �a STRATEGY #2 TOT�Ary.Lj� 0 ExSt ExSt 0 40,000 40,000 i 0 40,000 40,000 ��a. Develop new class A park 1,125,000 0 1,125,000 2,500,000 0 2,500,000 3,625,000 0 , 3,625,000 4B board „� ' c gib. Develop new class B park 85,000 0� 85,000 3,465,000 0 3,465,000 3,550 000 0 3,550 000 c. Develop plan for 4B Board 0 ExStj ExSt� 0 0 0 0 ExStExSt 4B Board. $ needed for incentives. G 9 I St ExSt 4B Board. Communication $resources. tl 0,00 STRATEGY #3 TOTAL Y 1,210,000 ExSt Al 210 000 5 965 00 7,175,000 0 7,175,000 List buisness land with commerical 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 Ex Z, S7 iA l � � 1 � i =1CBliil✓CTdNG"THL Q Q_ a"'a n > a 0 � 5 965 000 d a. ImPlementCVB study TBD TBD TBD, , ;, �.... 0 � 0 _ 0 ...._• ,� __ emu.. _�. . ___. 9.w � °. __ -•. _.. ,� .. TBD TBD TBD b. Develop Hotel/Conference Center 6,600,000 0 6,600,000 5,800,000 0 5,800,000 12,400,000 0 12,400,000 a c. Develop target marketing plan for Hotel TBD TBD TBD 0 0 0 0 0 0 H STRATEGY #4 TOTAL 6,600,000 TBD 6,600,000� 5,800,000 0 5,800,0001 12,400,000 TBD 12,400,0001 'NsTo rsriTEMENT#71FOTALS 7,810,0001 TIED 7,810,00011 11,765,0001 40,600 1i,8d5,0b0j 19,57a,0001 40,0001 19,615,0001 FX Sa rXiSfina Staff Resources VISION E cMENT 7 STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES Existing Resources New Resources Grand Total All p Total Capital 0&ilfl Total Capital 0&M Resources Capital 0&AN To Note 1i jib) ON N a W W, A I ® a. Require transition from developer to HOA 0 ExSt ExST 0 0 b. Address decline in single family areas 0 ExSt ExST j 0 0 6i 0 ExSt ExSt' ! J 0 0 ExSt ExSt t ';c. Historic lighting through College Hills p 0 ExSt ExSt 110,000 0 110,000 110,000 0 110,000 id. Infrastructure rehab in neighborhoods i 0 0 0 721,325 292,000 1,013,325 721,325 292,000 1,013,325 ! ,{ .• ; 292,000 1,123,325 92000 1123,325 831,325 EL .. � TOTAL a. New design and construction standards 0 ExSt~ ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt Z ISTRATEGY #2 TOTAL 0 ExSt ExSt 0, 0 I 0 0 0 0 I ZI Ia. Re-examine Northgate redevelopment 0 ExSt ExSt 0 62,500 62,500 0 62,500 62,500 c lb. Update comprehensive plan ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt o ISTRATEGY0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 62,500 62,500 0 62,500 62,500 I VISION STA TEMENT1 TOTALS ! 01 01 0 h 831,3251 354,5001 1,185,825 JJ 831,325 354,500 N 1,185,825 JJ ExST = Existing Staff Resources VISION STATEMENT 8 ('33TY OF COLLEGE STATION DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN Hiscal Year 2001 ® 2002 Presented to the Coflege Station City Counce �M�ll City of College Station Strategic Plan 2001-2002 Table of Contents Summary by Vision Statement ......................................................................... 4 VisionStatement #1 ................................................................................. 8 Customer -Focused City Services VisionStatement #2 ........................................................................................... 18 Safe, Secure, and Healthy Environment VisionStatement #3 ................................................................................. ....... 26 Clean Environment that Enhances and Protects the Quality of Life VisionStatement #4 ................................................................ ........................ 31 Cultural Arts and Recreational Opportunities VisionStatement #5 ......................................................................................... 40 Participate and Contribute to the Well-being of our Community VisionStatement #6 ....................................... ........................ ........................ 44 Easily Travel To, Within, and From the Community VisionStatement #7 ........................................... ............................................. 49 Strong and Diverse Economic Environment VisionStatement #8 ......................................................................................... 56 Well -Planned Neighborhoods Strategic Plan Resources ------- SCI PA 2001 Strategies By Vision Statement Vision Overall Priority Priority Score #5 Participate and Contribute to the Well Being of our Community. 1 I 32 13.29 ITo facilitate citizen participation, we will pursue methods of civic involvement. ( 2 I 35 3.14 To increase communication and citizen involvement, we will facilitate neighborhood association development. #6 Travel to, within and from the community. 1 13 4.14 To facilitate travel to, from, and within the community, we will maintain a current thoroughfare plan. ( 1 13 4.14 To provide for future transportation needs, we will participate in reckional and intermodal transportation planning. 3 18 4.00 To improve our "bike/pedestrian friendliness," we will construct and maintain bike/pedestrian infrastructure. 4 ( 29 3.43 To improve rider convenience, reliability, and accessibilty for citizens, we will improve the public transit system. #7 Contribute to and Benefit From Living in a Strong and Diverse Economic Environment. 2 3 4.86 To increase the diversity of our economy, we will be proactively involved in a regional approach to airport/air transportation. 2 3 4.86 To maintain and grow our sales tax base, we will proactively recruit retail businesses. ( 1 8 4.29 To provide adequate economic opportunity for our citizens, we will promote economic development. 4 13 4.14 To enhance College Station's tourism economy, we will evaluate policies directing the growth of this industry. #8 Live in Well Planned and Maintained Neighborhoods Suited to Community Interests and Lifestyles, 1 3 4.86 To prevent residential decline and improve nel0borhoods, we will create effective development policies. To ensure durable infrastructure that meets the community's needs, we will examine and improve our infrastructure 2 7 4.43 construction standards. 3 8 4.29 To ensure well planned neighborhoods, we will maintain and improve our Comprehensive Plan and development policies. To sustain the economic viability of all areas of College Stations we will develop a multi -year infrastructure rehabilitation 4 13 4.14 plan. Overall Strategy Ranking Vision Overall Priority Priority Score 29 3.43 To improve rider convenience, reliability, and accessibiltV for citizens we will improve the bublic transit system. To contribute to breaking the cycle of poverty and providing intervention for families in crisis, we will encourage holistic, 32 3.29 multi -agency social services. 32 3.29 To provide multi -use pedestrian recreation, we will connect parks facilities throuqh greenways and other opportunities. 32 3.29 To facilitate citizen participation, we will pursue methods of civic involvement. LL to improve parks planning, we will increase communication between the City Council, Parks Advisory Board, and the 35 + 13.14 Planning and Zoning Commission. 1 35 1 13.14 To increase communication and citizen involvement, we will facilitate neighborhood association development. 1 37 1 13.00 To protect the environment and our residents, -we will enhance explore composting, recyclinq, and other disposal capabilities Mission Statement On behalf of the citizens of College Station, a unique community and home of Texas A&M University, the City Council will promote the safety, health and general well-being of the community within the bounds of fiscal responsibility while preserving and advancing the quality of life resulting in exceptional civic pride. Vision #5 Participate and Contribute to the Well Being of Our Community Strategies 1. Facilitate Civic and Citizen Involvement - 4 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: $8,150 Total: $8,150 2. Increase Communication and Citizen Involvement - 1 Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $0 Existing: $10,000 Total: $10,000 Vision #6 Easily Travel To, Within and From the Community Strategies 1. Travel to, Within, and From the Community - 3 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $9,000,000 Existing: $9,000,000 Total: $18,000,000 2. Future Transportation - 1 Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 3. Bike/Pedestrian Friendliness - 4 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $0 Existing: $500,000 Total: $500,000 4. Improve Public Transit System - 1 Implementation Plan - Resources: New- $0 Existing: $240,000 Total: $240,000f Vision #7 Strong and Diverse Economic Environment Strategies 1. Regional Approach to Air/ Airport Transportation - 1 Implementation Plan - Resources: New: $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 2. Protective Retail Recruiting - 2 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $40,000 Existing: Existing staff Total: $40,000 3. Promote Economic Development - 4 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $5,965,000 Existing: $1,210,000 Total: $7,175,000 4. Enhance Tourism Economy and Industry Growth - 3 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $5,800,000 Existing:$6,600,000 Total: $12,400,000 Vision #8 Well Planned Neighborhoods Strategies 1. Prevent Residential Decline/ Create Dev. Policies - 4 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $1.123,325 Existing: Existing staff Total: $1,123,325 2. improve Construction Standards/Intrastructure -1 Implementation Plans - Resources: New. $0 Existing: Existing staff Total: Existing staff 3. Ensure Well Planned Reighborhoods/Standards - 2 Implementation Plans - Resources: New: $62,500 Existing: Existing staff Total: $62,500 Vision Statement #1 Customer Focused City Services Strategy #6 To ensure excellent customer service, we will provide appropriate facilities, training, and technology Implementation Plans a. Facilities Master Plan. b. Develop a multi -year e-government/telecommunication plan that balances personal customer service with technology. c. Complete City Center Plan (Phase 1). d. New 5 year CIP. 7 Vision Statement #1 Customer Focused City Services b. Review of Fiscal and Budgetary Policies and Franchise Agreements Plan Leader: Charles Cryan, Fiscal Services Director Summary: Conduct a comprehensive review of the City of College Station fiscal and budgetary policies. Recommend changes to the fiscal and budgetary policies that reflect Council direction to maximize the stability of the City's primary revenue streams. Implement any changes to the policies approved by the City Council. Also, conduct a review of the City's franchise agreements and a strategy for the development "of new franchise agreements. Policy Change: The fiscal and budgetary policies may change based on the direction given by the City Council. Resources: Existing staff time will be used to review and revise the policies and the franchise agreements. Outside assistance on the renewal of the cable franchise will be needed. Key Milestones: August 2001 Complete the preliminary review of Fiscal and Budgetary Policies with City Council. October 2001 Implement changes to the Fiscal and Budgetary Policies as the FY 02 budget is approved. January 2002 Present BTU franchise agreement to Council March 2002 Complete review of all possible franchising avenues. May 2002 Complete comprehensive review of Fiscal and Budgetary Policies as part of the FY 03 Budget. December 2002 Begin franchise negotiations on TXU Gas franchise December 2003 Begin franchise negotiations on Cox Cable franchise Plan Leader: Glenn Brown, Assistant City Manager Summary: In an effort to examine all possible revenue sources for the City of College Station, develop a systematic program to identify city owned land; and determine its present value to the City. Criteria will have to be developed to evaluate property as to its current or potential usefulness to the City. Any s property determined to be of minimal importance will be considered for selling through the appropriate legal processes. It is envisioned that once the process is established, and criteria for evaluation developed this process will be initiated every third year. Policy Change: Traditionally the City has only purchased property that it has a specific need for, and has held property for potential future use. With the process described above the City will take the position that all property is subject to a review process, and will be sold if it has no current or potential value for municipal purposes. Resources: Existing staff Key Milestones: November 2001 Receive policy direction from City Council on municipally owned land. January 2002 Complete GIS comprehensive listing of all City owned property, both in narrative form and maps. October 2002 Completion of Evaluation of all City property. N Vision Statement #1 Customer Focused City Services Identifv current customer service _problems related to development aDDficants and customers. August 2001 Identify communications problems, customer service issues through survey and analysis of customer group by Development Services Continuous Improvement Team. September 2001 Continuous Improvement Team meet with development community representatives to go over survey findings, discuss possible areas for improvements. October 2001 Continuous Improvement Team prepare specific recommendations to address issues identifies through survey, focus group. Recommendations presented to Department Heads of impacted departments, ACM. Develop communications Droarams and Products to ensure the development communitv is provided information as needed. September 2001 Review information currently provided to development customers, neighborhood organizations, website, etc. September 2001 Meet with development community representatives to determine what types of information products and services would be most beneficial. October 2001 Develop form and content of reports, information and publications as necessary to respond to needs identified. Develop processes or ongoing series of communications and relations meetings as necessary to respond to needs identified. Review current predevelopment meeting format and procedures to identifv problems that cause inconsistencies or uncertainties in providing information and responses to development aDDlicants. June 2001 Review form, content, scope. and purpose of predevelopment meetings and other processes use to respond to developer proposals and questions. July 2001 Meet with development community representatives to discuss customer needs. August 2001 Identify, implement changes in the predevelopment - pre -application processes and communications. Implementation Plans �--�-'g®sq! My^ng,,'d y...}�`sFhpppp3"i/q-:>prq tf y`�9'p yygY.,�`Rv"y'g.�Tgf■hpy3�?'*psoY/p pq�ZA� �j-may 1r �' �L`,.y acY�. 3 t c`-- k .: = Plan Leader: Julie O'Connell, Director of Human Resources Summary: Continue to monitor compensation levels through salary surveys to determine 60"' percentile and to move towards paying at that market rate. This is an.ongoing plan. Policy Change: This policy was approved by the City Council in April 2000. Resources: $1,876,848 is included in the FY 02 proposed budget to fund the pay plan and associated market adjustments. Key Milestones: October 2001 Adjustment of exempt salaries by 3% not to exceed midpoint January 2002 FY 02 market adjustments based on 2001 salary survey results. April 2002 Annual salary survey complete Pid15Ue GO!)I etiti, , COSt E'ff@C�fYe hB 11 lJasl %lealf%1 ltlSUfc3/ICe �ellet!lS n P U ,�..,.. . . Plan Leader: Julie O'Connell, Director of Human Resources 11 Vision Statement #1 Customer Focused City Services May 2002 Issue retention rate report to Council e. Promote employee recognition through identifying and developing meaningful recognition programs Plan Leader: Julie O'Connell, Human Resources Director Summary: Continue all existing and consider development of new programs that recognize and reward employee achievement, excellent customer service, and continuous improvement efforts. This is an ongoing,plan. Policy Change: None required Resources: Budget at least at FY01 level for recognition programs Key Milestones: December 2001 Implement Continuous Improvement team to review current recognition programs, improve and/or add new ones llmpiementaYion Plans a. Implement deregulation strategic plan Plan Leader: John Woody, Public Utilities Director Summary: The implementation phase of the electric deregulation strategic plan will commence in October 2001. The implementation phase will consist of development work by both staff and consultant on action plans identified in the strategic plan. These action plans deal with the following areas; Financial, Operations/Engineering, Customers, Energy Supply, City Issues, New Business Opportunities, Community Issues. This will be an ongoing project for the next several years. Policy Change: It is anticipated that there will be numerous police changes required in moving into the newly deregulated environment in the electric industry, especially if the City Council decides to opt -in to electric competition. The scope and extent of policy changes will be better know as the action plans are developed. Resources: Use of outside consulting services will be required to develop and implement the action plans. Currently there is $100,000 allocated and approved by Council for outside consulting services to assist in completing a Business Plan for the Utility. This Business Plan will incorporate results of the action plans that will be developed. It is anticipated that there will be ongoing expenses by the Utility in the advertising and marketing area as it pertains to the deregulated electric environment. Additional personnel to handle the additional responsibilities are also expected. Key Milestones: September 2001 Final Draft of the Strategic Plan will be given to Council. October 2001 Commence work on action plans. April 2002 Action plans and Business Plan to be completed. 13 Vision Statement #1 Customer Focused City Services d. An SLA for $ 61,417 has been submitted in the FY02 Budget for an E- Government Coordinator. This position will be utilized to coordinate and integrate the various systems needed to accomplish putting utility payments and court citations online. The position will also coordinate all city Internet web page changes. Key Milestones: April 2001 Prepare budget requirements for plan September 2001 Council approval of modified plan and budget December 2001 Training/Advertising of new services provided electronically January 2002 First electronic services are brought online January 2003 Conduct survey to evaluate electronic service utilization/satisfaction February 2003 Evaluate Results and Modify E-Government Plan to meet further needs April 2003 Submit Modified multi -year plan through budget process c° :.Complete City Center Plari,(F'frase /) Plan Leader: Glenn Brown, Assistant City Manager Summary: In December of 2000 the City Council approved a concept plan for a City Center project as recommended by the City Center Ad Hoc Advisory Committee. The anchor facility for the City Center is a new City Hall. The project is to be located between Krenek Tap Road and Harvey Mitchell Parkway. Phase 1 of this plan involves the purchase of property for City Hall and other public purposes. This phase also includes the development of an overlay -zoning district to ensure development of the surrounding property based on the adopted concept plan. Future phases will include construction of a new City Hall and development of the privately owned sections of the property in accordance with the concept plan. Policy Change: None foreseen at this time. Resources: $1.5 million in 1998 bond funds designated for City Center land purchase. Staff time will be required from the Land Agent and planning staff. Key Milestones: August 2001 Completion of process for identifying property in plan areas to be used for a City Hall and the ROW needed for the extension of Dartmouth from Krenek Tap Road to FM 2818. October 2001 Needs resolution presented to City Council for property to be Purchased. December 2001 Land Survey and Appraisal Complete February 2002 P&Z adoption of Overlay Zone for City Center March 2002 Council Adoption of City Center Overlay zoning district. April 2002 Either complete negotiations with property owners or request Council authorization to institute condemnation proceeding. June 2002 Close purchase of land if negotiated sale, and take possession of property. December 2002 Commission Hearing if Condemned, and take possession of property. d ., New,, Year CIP Plan Leader: Charles Cryan, Director of Fiscal Services Summary: New 5-year CIP. Develop plan for Capital Improvement Plan for the next five (5) years. Policy Change: No change, reintroduction of process for general government capital projects that will plan for projects not included in the 1998 bond authorization election. 15 Vision Statement ## 2 Safe, Secure and Healthy Environment Vision Statement #2 As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from living in a safe, secure and healthy environment. Strategy #9 To protect life and property, we will provide adequate fire protection and emergency medical services to all College Station citizens Implementation Plans a. Countywide Fire Station Planning b. Proactive Fire Station planning and site acquisition c. Enhance traffic pre-emption program Strategy #2 To plan for College Station's infrastructure needs, we will review annexation policy and options Implementation Plans a. Staff prepare annexation service plan, fiscal impact analysis and resolution; and implementation of service plan. Strategy #3 To increase the safety and security of our streets, we will take action to promote public safety Implementation Plans a. Street markings b. Red-light running. c. Overall public safety/education plan. d. Thoroughfare lighting. e. Police accreditation. f. Police reserve program. Strategy #4 To contribute to breaking the cycle of poverty and providing intervention for families in crisis, we will encourage holistic, multi -agency social services Implementation Plans a. Improve information and Referral system. Strategy #5 To protect the environment and our residents, we will enhance recycling, composting, and other disposal capabilities Implementation Plans a. Initiate multi -family recycling and increase recycling promotion/education. 17 Vision Statement # 2 Safe, Secure and Healthy Environment Key Milestones: February 2002 Determine final location for fire station five. April 2002 Begin land acquisition process for station five. June 2002 Begin contract and design phase for fire station five. January 2003 Begin contract phase for construction of fire station five. January 2004 Open fire station five. *Time line undetermined for next city CIP program_ CSFD will be submitted items under the next CIP. c Enhance traffic pre-emption program Plan Leader: David Giordano, Fire Chief Summary: This plan will address the continued implementation of a traffic light pre- emption system in College Station whereby emergency vehicles will be able to control intersection traffic lights during emergency response. The system will enhance emergency vehicle responses by allowing responding apparatus to turn traffic lights green dependent upon their direction of travel. There are currently thirteen traffic lights and seven Fire Department vehicles equipped with the Opticom system. Policy Change: Council policy has shifted from the Fire Department maintaining an ISO rating to three to providing adequate fire and EMS protection. Resources This plan will be carried out with funding provided for in the CIP Traffic Enhancement program. 3M company is the primary provider for this system. Milestones: July 2001 Assess traffic patterns and review future traffic light plans in College Station August 2001 Determine most appropriate intersection for Opticom installation. April 2002 Complete phase two of equipment installation May 2002 Assess effectiveness of Opticom phase two. June 2002 Begin assessment for phase three "Opticom" installation Implementation Plans Plan Leader: Jim Callaway, Development Services Director Summary: This plan is a continuation and further development of the annexation feasibility study recently completed and presented to Council. This work is now proceeding in accordance with Council direction. This implementation plan provides a summary of the steps that will be taken in that process. Policy Change: This plan will lead to the development of new annexation policy. Resources: New resources will be needed to fully implement this plan. Key Milestones: May 2001 Prepare outline service plan. June 2001 Prepare detailed mapping, property owner identification, acreage and related information for analysis. August 2001 Service plan information, CIP prepared by operating departments. 19 Vision Statement # 2 Safe, Secure and Healthy Environment September 2001 Review high accident intersections. Establish work schedule for dates and times officers will work these intersections. c. Overall public safety/education plan Plan Leader: Kelley Cole, Public Communications & Marketing Manager Summary: Utilize marketing plan tactics and strategies to create and implement an overall Public Safety Education Campaign. Formulate a citizen education plan to modify behavior regarding traffic safety. Policy Change: Expansion of marketing public safety programs. Resources: Will use marketing tactics that are currently funded through the marketing plan. Key Milestones: December 2001 Develop program to create and implement a customized Public Safety Marketing Plan and Campaign January 2002 Begin implementation of customized Public Safety Marketing Plan and Campaign. December 2002 Review campaign success. d. Thoroughfare lighting, Plan Leader: John Woody, Director of Public Utilities Summary: The thoroughfare lighting plan has been divided into several plans for the different types of streets in the City of College Station. The various plans are for Major Arterial, Minor Arterial, Major Collector, Minor Collector, and Freeways & Expressways, Residential street lighting improvements are handled one-on-one with the citizens and developers. The thoroughfare lighting plans are projected over the next five years for installation. Some are relatively simple plans using existing poles while others will require in- depth planning and design. Policy Change: No policy changes are foreseen at this time. Project designs will be closely monitored to adhere to operating standards already developed and utilized. Resources: Current resources will be used to implement this plan. Key Milestones: 2001 Hwy 30/Harvey Road (Major Arterials) Texas Avenue (Major Arterials) 2002 Rock Prairie (Minor Arterials) Central Park Lane (Minor Collections) Edelweiss (Minor Collectors) Eagle Ave. (Minor Collectors) 2003 George Bush Drive (Major Arterials) Francis Drive (Major Collectors) Graham Road(Major Collectors) Baron Road (Minor Arterials) 2004 Wellborn Road (Major Arterials) University Drive (Major Arterials) Longmire (Major Collectors) 2005 Harvey Mitchell (Freeways and Expressways) Earl Rudder (Freeways and Expressways) Spring Loop Drive (Major Collectors) 21 October 2001 Plan and conduct a recruiting drive to solicit potential applicants from the community to serve as reserve police officers March 2002 Establish reserve coordinator Implementation Plans r ve infoartta#on antl Referrav_ Plan Leader: Randy Brumley, Administrator of Community Development Summary: Support the development of a holistic Information and Referral System and Outcome Measurement system that will inform, educate and insure delivery of self sufficiency tools to those most in need of health and human services available in the community and development of a workforce training system that will expand opportunities for local residents to increase job skills. This is a medium term plan to be evaluated during the period 2000-2003. Policy Change: None Resources: CDBG staff assistance and administrative budget support. Key Milestones: October 2001 Project Unity and Barbara Bush Parent Center will establish a base level of measurement for evaluating the effectiveness of enabling families to "break the cycle of poverty." September 2002 Have registered twenty Bryant/College Station providers of health and human services and three City Departments as TexasOne Client Management System Partners. September 2002 Provide two community wide training workshops to 10 local non-profit providers of health and human services on agency collaboration, shared resources and community leadership skills. January 2003 Implementation of 2-1-1 Texas in the Brazos Valley Region. Calls will ring into First Call for Help call center. September 2003 Successful completion of development of a workforce training system that will expand opportunities for local residents to increase job skills by coordinating training activities of Barbara Bush Parent Center, Human Resource Department, Teen Apprenticeship Program and other area wide programs with demonstrated program outcome information. Implementation Plans a., Inifiaie nuiti-famrl� recycling; and increase rill.ecycling promotrarrleducat�ort g Plan Leader: Jim Smith, Assistant Public Works Director/BVSWMA Director 23 Vision Statement #3Clean Environment that Enhances and Protects the Quality of Life Vision Statement #3 As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from living in a clean environment that enhances and protects the quality oflife. Strategy#1 Tomaintain the quality ofour neighborhoods, vvowill strengthen code enforcement in residential areas Implementation Plans ` a. Enhance noise abatement enforcement program b. Examine and enhance aproactive code enforcement program Stratogy#2 To protect urban open space that provides recreation and mobility opportunities, vvmwill implement agreenwoyssystem Implementation Plans a. Complete Wolf Pen Creek trails phase I and begin design ofphase Utrails b. Greensvvoyeducation plan Strategy #3 Toprotect the environment, vvewill endeavor tomaintain storm water quality Implementation Plans a. Develop strategy for implementing federal storm water quality regulations Stralegy#4 Tnprotect the environment, vvewill endeavor tomaintain air quality a. Develop an urban plan b. Examine alternative fuel options for the fleet 25 Vision Statement # 3 Clean Environment that Enhances and Protects the . Quality of Life Summary: This will be complete review of ordinances, procedures and staffing dealing with code enforcement in residential areas of College Station to maintain the quality of our neighborhoods. This is a medium term plan. Policy Change: Policy changes may be needed if Council determines changes should be made to current ordinances, if stricter ordinances on property maintenance standards are adopted or if an increase in the amount of pro -active code enforcement is desired. Resources: Additional staffing resources will be determined once Council reviews and/or modifies existing codes and Community Enhancement activities. Key Milestones: July 2001 Present 2000 International Property Maintenance Code to Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals for review September 2001 Conduct Benchmark Survey of code enforcement procedures and ordinances of cities with Big Twelve Schools. November 2001 Present findings of study and public meeting to Council and receive direction on how they would like to proceed. January 2002 Conduct a series of Stakeholder meetings to receive input from neighborhood planning teams, residents and rental property owners. February 2002 Review current ordinances and draft revisions to come comply with City Council direction. June 2002 Present draft ordinances to City Council during a workshop meeting. August 2002 Modify implementation plan as per direction provided by City Council. Implementation Plans �a ornplefe�Wo�f_Penreek�ra®/s_phase,ia�'r/�rinc%sagno,�,kp`,;asif�„.�`.� '$ ,�,�� Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Complete design plans for lower and upper trail systems. This portion of the plan is considered short term. Policy change: The WPC development ordinance as it relates to the dedication of land for sidewalks/trails and channel improvements must be revised. Resources: Current staff resources and outside design services will be utilized. Key Milestones: September 2001 Design plans for the lower trail system. December 2001 Bids for construction of Phase I of lower trail system. Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Develop a greenways education program to educate the public, developers and community leaders about the benefits of greenways to our community and to provide guidance for the acquisition and development of greenways in 27 Vision Statement # 3 Clean Environment that Enhances and Protects the Quality of Life Plan Leader: Ross Albrecht, Forestry Superintendent Summary: Develop an Urban Forest Management Plan for the City of College Station that will provide guidelines for Urban Forest Management including inventory, tree maintenance, and forest renewal. Policy Change: (None. Resources: Staff time to prepare grant application and request for proposal. Grant request to Texas Forest Service in the amount of $10,000. SLA request for FY 2002 in the amount of $20,000. Key Milestones: December 2001 Select consultant for project May 2002 Presentation of consultant's report to City Council and receive Council direction. June 2002 Determine the implementation plan based upon Council decision. July 2002 Submit implementation plan to Council for consideration. b. Ek ®mine'altem6dve fde[ `options ':fort/ae Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Identify alternative fuel options for basic fleet and emergency vehicles. This is a short-term plan. Policy change Review current policies and recommend changes as needed. Resources: Fleet replacement fund can be utilized to fund any alternative fuel options for the basic fleet and emergency vehicle purchases. Key Milestones: March 2002 Present proposed alternative fuel options and recommendations. 29 Vision Statement #4 Cultural Arts and Recreational Opportunities Strategy #7 To provide multi -use pedestrian recreation, we will connect parks facilities through greenways and other opportunities Implementation Plans a. Wolf Pen Creek masterplan implementation b. Implement demonstration project to establish a future policy regarding greenway-park connectivity. Strategy #8 To improve parks planning, we will increase communication between the City Council, Parks Advisory Board, and the Planning and Zoning Commission Implementation Plans a. Facilitate better communications between the City Council, Parks & Recreation Advisory Board and the Planning & Zoning Commission. 31 Vision Statement #4 Cultural Arts and Recreational Opportunities Implementation Plans a. Implement parks maintenance standards Plan Leader: Curtis Bingham, Parks Operations Superintendent Summary: Implementation of the approved Park Maintenance Standards over a multi- year period. Policy Change: Change the method of parks maintenance operations from a scheduled service -based approach to a standards -based program as approved by City Council. Resources: Parks Operations and Forestry staff time, external landscape maintenance companies, and funding requests through the annual budget process. Key Milestones: August 2001 Develop performance measurement methodology to track the percentage of standard achieved. October 2001 Begin tracking performance utilizing approved methodology. December 2001 Submit the first quarter performance report to the Office of Budget and Strategic Planning. January 2002 Award the contract maintenance bid, if the SLA is approved. March 2002 Complete the recommendations for a future maintenance district, realignment, and additional support facilities. May 2002 Develop recommendations for future CIP program and budget requests based upon Council direction. Implementation Plans i. WAW �/t? Ietidetl)f Crater elAela$1O al �ffC des' n Stc?d7(�arC�S F�c' Plan Leader: Eric Ploeger, Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation Summary: Implement intergenerational park design standards for new parks, as well as begin to retrofit current parks as the opportunity arises. Current CIP projects will be designed with these standards. Policy Change: Change park design process to include intergenerational park features as approved by the City Council in March, 2001. Resources: Bond funds, parkland dedication funds, staff time. Key Milestones: October 2001 Review potential Replacement Fund items and Park Land Dedication Fund availability for potential intergenerational projects, and implement as resources are available. December 2001 Include upgrades of existing parks an development of future parks in future CIP. FY 2002 Completion of Brison Park, Gabbard Park, and Merry Oaks Park, Madeley Park, Woodway Park, Spring Loop Park improvements expected. 33 Resources: Key Milestones: June 2001 August 2001 September 2001 October 2001 November 2001 January 2002 February 2002 Recreation Advisory Board. Potential development of parkland acceptance policy. Existing staff and funds. Staff review of internal parkland acceptance process. Unified development code presentation and policy direction for Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, and staff. Focus Group to meet with developers to review draft changes in the Parkland Dedication Ordinance. Staff completes draft revisions to Parkland Dedication Ordinance; Parks and Recreation Advisory Board takes action on Dedication Ordinance revisions. Planning & Zoning Commission takes action on Parkland Dedication Ordinance revisions. City Council consideration of revisions to the Parkland Dedication Ordinance. d , .:,Dave!®p IYfasfer,P'la��for.rr�w corium® pains®te and curret�lacadl srte�: � �' Plan Leader: Eric Ploeger, Asst. Parks and Recreation Director Summary: Develop a master plan for the current landfill and the new community park on Rock Prairie Road, adjacent to the landfill as it relates to a small area plan. Policy Change: None. Resources: Parks Planning, GIS Information Key Milestones: November 2001 Develop facility needs for the new Community Park to serve the southern portion of the City. February 2002 Submit facility needs for possible inclusion in the new 5-year CIP Plan. Summer 2003 Present conceptual Master Plan to the Parks and Recreation -Advisory Board. Fall 2003 Complete conceptual Master Plan and present it to the City Council:: ;.. Implementation Plans a,�revel®p Mans f orfcrarr5nioi aaind fanci(rt�es���SR z 100 41... Plan Leader: Marci Rodgers, Senior Services Coordinator Summary: Explore the recommendations from the Eisenhower Leadership Development report, and conduct a survey to determine feasibility and potential for joint projects with governmental, business, and not -for -profit organizations. Develop facility alternatives and recommendations to include capital and operating costs. Policy Change: Develop policies regarding future programs and facilities to meet the needs of senior populations in the community. Resources: Parks and Recreation Department Staff, Community Development Department. 35 Vision Statement #4 Cultural Arts and Recreational Opportunities September 2001 Council Consideration of ongoing funding increase for Art in Public places Program to purchase representative sculpture artwork in College Station. October 2001 Present proposed selection process to acquire representative work for College Station to Council for approval. November 2001 Begin selection of work for purchase in FY02 December 2001 Presentation, discussion, and possible action by Council regarding a change in policy establishing capital funding for public facilities. Consider change of policy to include funding allocation for public art as a part of construction costs Implementation Plans Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Public Works Director Summary: Continue the implementation of the Wolf Pen Creek Masterplan. This is a short-term plan. Policy change: May accelerate debt issuance to finance projects within this TIF. Resources: Drainage utility funds, GOB '95 funds, Parkland Dedication Funds, WPC TIF funds August 2001 Review WPC TIF capital budget. September 2001 Revise zoning ordinance regarding dedication of land for WPC development September 2001 Complete lower trail design December 2001 Begin construction of phase I trails December 2002 Complete channel design Construct future trail proiects. as funds are available Plan Leader: Eric Ploeger, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Summary: Provide pedestrian connections between parks, greenways, and residential areas including Lick Creek Park, Pebble Creek Park, Bee Creek park, Lemontree Park, Central Park, and Veterans Park and Athletic Complex. Policy Change: Provide linkage between greenways and parks to provide access for pedestrians and cyclists. Resources: Staff time, Lick Creek Park Development Funds ('98 Bond), Business Park Landscaping Funds. Key Milestones: July 2001 Complete Phase 1 of the bike loop project in Central, Bee Creek, and Lemontree Parks. August 2001 Link Pebble Creek Park to the Business Park during Phase 11 of the Business Park Landscaping Project. October 2002 Utilize existing bond funds and Trails Grant funds for Lick Creek Park trails development, to include connection with Pebble Creek Parkway. 37 Vision Statement #5 Participate and Contribute to the Well Being of Our Community Vision Statement #5 As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from participating and contributing to the well being of our community. Strategy #1 To facilitate citizen participation, we will pursue methods of civic involvement Implementation Plans a. Utilize citizen survey to enhance civic involvement b. Neighborhood Involvement c. Increase voter turnout d. Citizen involvement programs Strategy #2 To increase communication and citizen involvement, we will facilitate neighborhood association development Implementation Plans a. Assist in the formation of neighborhood associations Vision Statement #5 Participate and Contribute to the Well Being of Our Community November 2001 College Hills area neighborhood plan presented to Council for adoption, including implementation plan. c. Increase .voter turnout Plan Leader: Connie Hooks, City Secretary Summary: To recruit new voters and increase overall turnout to city elections, we will proactively look at methods to encourage citizens to.the polls on election day. This is a medium term plan. Policy Change: None Resources: Current budget does not provide resources for added early voting locations or printed media to voters. Key Milestones: October 2001 Review county redistricting plan and determine new election precincts. December 2001 Recommend new polling places to council and additional early voting site. January 2002 Focus group with citizen university graduates for input on issue. Kids Voting Campaign. March 2002 Publish election information in Utility Bill inserts. June 2002 Evaluate election results in light of increasing voter turnout. nv®IVemen, rograms Plan Leader: Glenn Brown, Assistant City Manager Summary: Continue offering a variety of educational and informational academies and/or programs that involve citizens, in order to encourage a better understanding of city government and to instill the idea of citizen responsibility in the quality of government and community life. These programs include the Citizen's Police Academy, Citizen's Fire Academy, Citizen's University, the monthly Mayor's Brunch, and Teen Court. These are existing and ongoing programs. Policy Change: N/A ;Resources: Resources for these programs at their current levels are already included within each responsible department's budgets and include the use of existing staff to maintain the programs. Teen Court is run completely with volunteers and one paid staff person. Increased use of graduates or participants of these various programs to promote and motivate additional citizen involvement and to operate the programs appears to be a viable way to increase participation and interest. Key Milestones: Fall 2001 Complete twenty-ninth Citizen's Police Academy. 2002 Monthly Mayor's Brunch. April 2002 Complete fifth Citizen's University. May 2002 Complete third Citizen's Fire Academy. June 2002 Complete fourth year of Teen Court. 41 Vision Statement #6 Easily Travel To, Within and From the Community Vision Statement #6 As a result of our efforts citizens will benefit from easily traveling to, within and from the community. Strategy #1 To facilitate travel to, from, and within the community, we will maintain a current thoroughfare plan Implementation Plans a. Complete currently approved street capital projects b. Develop short term new street capital program c. Update thoroughfare plan through small area planning process Strategy #2 To provide for future transportation needs, we will participate in regional and intermodal transportation planning Implementation Plans a. Participate in multi -agency regional transportation planning Strategy #3 To improve our bike/pedestrian friendliness, we will construct and maintain bike/pedestrian infrastructure Implementation Plans a. Sidewalk retrofit program b. Bikeway plan update c. Bike loop expansion project d. Existing bike loop project phase III Strategy #4 To improve rider convenience, reliability, and accessibility for citizens, we will improve the public transit system Implementation Plans a. Take action on Dean International recommendations to improve the mass transit system_ 43 Vision Statement #6 Easily Travel To, Within and From the Community Summary: This implementation plan focuses on the use if the small area planning approach for maintaining the City's thoroughfare plan. While this is a long term, ongoing program, this plan focuses on the program for the current FY. Policy Change: There is no policy change required. Resources: Current resources will be used to implement the plan for this FY. Key Milestones; September 2001 Identify and review area thoroughfare alternatives. October 2001 P&Z subcommittee review of thoroughfare and land use alternatives. November 2001 Public meeting for area property owner, citizen input. November 2001 Draft plan review by P&Z subcommittee. January 2002 Final plan presented to P&Z for adoption. March 2002 Final plan presented to Council with resolution to amend comprehensive plan. Implementation Plans Plan Leader: Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services. Summary: Regional transportation planning is typically a very long rang process, with time frames and horizons that range from ten to twenty years. Regional transportation planning in College Station includes ongoing participation in interagency planning with organizations such as the local Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Brazos Valley Council of Governments. This implementation plan focuses on short-term activities to review current planning efforts, identification of opportunities for increased regional planning efforts and the development of policy related to College Station's participation in regional transportation. This plan also includes ongoing participation in the railroad relocation study currently being conducted by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. Policy Change: There is no current formally adopted policy related to regional transportation planning. This plan is intended to lead to the development of a local policy position on this issue. Resources: Current resources will be used to implement this plan. Additional resources may be required to change levels of participation in the future. Key Milestones: Continue participation in the MPO rail relocation study October 2001 Provide quarterly update to Council. January 2002 Provide quarterly update to Council. April 2002 Provide quarterly update to Council. July 2002 Provide quarterly update to Council. Facilitate a regional transportation visioning program throuah Dean International and the Brazos Valley, Council of Governments. November 2001 Target date for regional transportation visioning process kickoff. 45 Vision Statement #6 Easily Travel To, Within and From the Community Award of construction is expected within eighteen months of award of grant with the construction schedule to require twelve months after bid award. See grant application for project time line. d. Existing bike loop project Phase 111 Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Complete the portion of the Bike Loop Project that provides for a connection between Bee Creek Park and Cy Miller Park via the Arboretum and under Texas Avenue. This implementation plan is considered to be short term. Policy change: None identified Resources: Additional funding, beyond that remaining from Phases I & II, is anticipated in order to complete the existing bike loop along Bee Creek and through the box culverts under Texas Avenue. Key Milestones: October 2001 Approval of the Bee Creek drainage plans by the Corps of Engineers. August 2002 Estimated date for completion of the Bee Creek drainage improvements. October 2002 Phase III of the Bike Loop project to be bid June 2003 Completion of the Phase III of the Bike Loop project Imolementation Plans a. ;Take action on:Dean lnternationa/ r6,&om nendations to impr�avethe mass transit system Plan Leader: Glenn Brown, Assistant City Manager Summary: Dean International, Inc., Public Policy Transportation Consultants have been hired to review and recommend enhancements for many of the City's transportation related programs. Dean International will also work with the City of College Station as an advocate for funding transportation related programs for the City through contacts in Austin and Washington DC. Dean International is currently reviewing the mass transit needs of College Station and the overall operations of Brazos Transit, and will make recommendations accordingly. Policy Change: The City,is taking a more proactive role in evaluating the effectiveness of mass transit service in College Station. Resources: Budgeted Funds for Dean International and City Staff. Key Milestones: October 2001 Dean International presents report and recommendations at a Regular City Council Meeting December 2001 Staff and City Council complete evaluation of Dean report and answer any remaining questions December 2001 Council provides direction to staff regarding mass transit for College Station April 2002 Council considers a staff -prepared action plan to implement Councils direction for change. 47 Vision Statement #i Strong and Diverse Economic Environment As a result of our efforts citizens will contribute to and benefit from living in a strong and diverse economic environment. ® Economic development compatible ® Business center with community values ® Strong retail ® Protection of property values ® Job opportunities ® Tourism, conventions a Reasonable cost of living ® Adequate transportation Implementation Plans Takeagn on i� ara r�tertaatr®nalsgr®nab ar�}s��f/air v4l—'W""�"' _.> Plan Leader: Glenn Brown, Assistant City Manager Summary: Dean International is reviewing the airport/air transportation needs of College Station. At this time they are especially focused on the need for a regional airport, and Texas A&M's recent announcement of their desire leave the airport operations business. Dean International will make recommendations specifically for College Station, but any action taken will also impactlinciude Bryan and Brazos County. (Also see summary comments from Vision 6, Strategy 4-1). Policy Change: The City of College Station will take a leadership role in ensuring that airport and air transportation services not only continue, but will be enhanced for the entire Brazos Valley area. Resources: Budgeted funds for Dean International, City staff, cooperative efforts with Bryan, Brazos County, and Texas A&M. s Key Milestones: August 2001 Dean International presents their Airport report and recommendations at a regular City Council Meeting. September 2001 Complete evaluation of Dean recommendations and coordination with other affected governments. This evaluation will include a joint meeting with the Bryan City Council and possibly the Brazos Commissioners Court. October 2001 College Station City Council provides direction to City staff to develop an action plan to ensure the local economy stays strong during any potentjal change in airport operations. November 2001 City Staff complete a more detailed implementation plan based on City Council direction. Implementation Plans is Conduct"marketrng$�ctrvrtres�to'•ta ' "sted retar/ and�comrraer+cral�bu rs nesses �� , "� 49 Vision Statement #7 Strong and Diverse Economic Environment EWE Implementation Plans a. Develop new Class "A" Business Par1c Plan Leader: Kim Foutz, Director of Economic Development Summary: Develop a future business park in College Station to increase the diversity of the College Station economy. The park is designed specifically to target information/technology companies in a high -end, park -like setting. Park development includes master planning, engineering, and development. Land acquisition is complete. Policy change: This is a continuation of the existing policy to diversify our economy by providing sufficient Class "A" light industrial locations and incentives for companies. Resources: In FY'01, 340 acres of Class "A" business center park land was acquired at a cost of $3,796,910 (less 118 acres of greenway acquisition costs). In addition, approximately 37 additional acres will be acquired in FY01 to enhance the park's Highway 6 frontage and area suitable for large users ($1,000,000). Master planning will occur in FY01-02 and $125,000 was allocated for this purpose. In FY '02, funding for phase I engineering will be needed ($225,000). Proposed funding for Phase I development in '03 includes using various enterprise funds and certificate of obligation of $2,275, 000. Key Milestones: July 2001 Recommend new concept for covenants and restrictions to City Council June 2002 Complete master plan and covenants for site December 2002 Complete Phase I engineering plans for site December 2003 Complete Phase I development of site S Plan Leader: Kim Foutz, Director of Economic Development Summary: Develop a future business park in College Station, through a public/private partnership to increase the diversity of the College Station economy. Park development includes master planning, engineering, and development of infrastructure by the City. The private partner will develop spec buildings for each phase of the park. Once Phase I is complete, additional phased development will occur in conjunction with demand for the site and associated buildings. Policy change: This is a continuation of the existing policy to diversify our economy by providing sufficient alternative light industrial locations and incentives for companies. However, this approach is somewhat different because it does not involve acquisition and ownership of land by the City. Resources: Since this is a public/private partnership, acquisition of land by the City is not anticipated for this project. Master planning begins in FY01 and $10,000 in economic development funds are allocated for this purpose. Additional resources are needed for engineering in FY '02. Proposed funding is C1l Vision Statement ##7 Strong and Diverse Economic Environment Implementation Plans a. i'mptement consultant studyof CVB project. Plan Leader: Charles Cryan, Fiscal Services Director Summary: Randal Travel Marketing prepared and presented- a marketing and organizational study of the Bryan/College Station Convention and Visitors Bureau. The study, including recommendations, were presented to the community and the Chamber Board in April, 2001. The study included a number of significant recommendations and implementation of the recommendations is a priority of the College Station City Council and work plan for FY 2002. Policy change: Staff received direction from the City Council to develop a process to establish the CVB as a stand alone organization. Resources: The City provides approximately $650,000 in funding for the operations of the CVB, a building and has made a grant application to provide a new site for the offices and a visitor center along with an additional $500,000 as a match for the grant. Key Milestones: June 14, 2001 City Council received the Randal study and recommendations for the CVB. July 2001 Meet with the City of Bryan and Brazos County to determine their desire to fund and participate in the governance of a stand alone CVB. August 2001 Report findings regarding the willingness of Brazos County and the City of Bryan to partner with College Station to fund and provide governance for the CVB. August 2001 Identify additional stakeholders who wish to partner with College Station to provide direction and develop a new direction and focus for the CVB. Appoint a taskforce to work with city staff to prepare bylaws and articles of incorporation for a stand-alone CVB. October 2001 Present draft bylaws and articles of incorporation to each of the governing bodies that wish to participate as partners in governing a separate CVB for review and adoption. November 2001 Appoint a taskforce to select an executive director for the CVB. October 2002 Full separation between the B/CS Chamber of Commerce and the CVB. Plan Leader: Kim Foutz, Director of Economic Development Summary: This plan involves continued development of a conference center and full service hotel adjacent to a new corporate office and performing arts centbr. This project is intended to develop College Station's tourism economy and sales tax base. Policy Change: This is a continuation of past and current Council policies. Resources: The City has already issued $5,500,000 in Certificate of Obligation debt, $600,000 in Hotel/Motel funds, and $500,000 in electric funds for construction and equipping of the conference center. An additional $5,400,000 in Certificate of Obligation debt for the conference center is needed for a total facility cost of $12,000,000. In addition, the City will fund 53 Vision Statement #8 Well -Planned Neighborhoods Vision Statement #8 As a result of our efforts citizens will live in well -planned neighborhoods suited to community interests and lifestyles. Strategy #1 To prevent residential decline and improve neighborhoods, we will create effective development policies Implementation Plans a. Develop policies and code requirements to require landscape maintenance in multi -family developments, require the transition from developer to HOA,responsibility, and impact neighborhood layouts. b. Develop solutions that address decline in single family areas. c. Designate areas for historic lighting through the Eastgate neighborhood planning process. d. Investing in infrastructure rehab in older neighborhoods. Strategy #2 To ensure durable infrastructure that meets the community's needs, we will examine and improve our infrastructure construction standards Implementation Flans a. Implement new design and construction standards Strategy #3 To ensure well -planned neighborhoods, we will maintain and improve our Comprehensive Flan and development policies Implementation Playas a. Re-examine Northgate redevelopment plan b. Update comprehensive plan through small area planning 55 Vision Statement #8 Well -Planned Neighborhoods Review property standard codes, enforcement policies, consider policy alternatives October 2001 Present and review findings, alternate property standard code Desiqnate areas for antiaue decorative lightinq through the eastoate neighborhood planninq program May 2001 Conduct public opinion survey to determine need for public improvements and neighborhood plans for the College Hills Planning area. June 2001 Hold public meeting to receive neighborhood input on possible area improvements, programs and services. August 2001 College Hills area Citizen's Planning Team to prepare final recommendations for area improvements, programs and priorities. October 2001 College Hills area neighborhood plan presented to P&Z for recommendations to Council. November 2001 College Hills area neighborhood plan presented to Council for adoption, including implementation plan. d . investing in ihfra!ii .® ft irefrab n odder neighborhoods. Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: Develop a Master Plan to identify those areas within the City in need of street, drainage, and utility rehabilitation work. The plan should address possible redevelopment uses and road closures in Northgate. This implementation is considered short term. Review results of rehabilitation of Northgate Plan and make adjustments as necessary. Policy change: None identified Resources: Identify new funding sources to develop the Master Plan and specific rehabilitation projects. $721,325 in Community Development Funds are proposed for Northgate Street Improvement. $202,000 in Residential Rehab Funds, and $90,000 in Thoroughfare Rehab Funds are proposed for. Northgate Street Projects/ Key Milestones: August 2001 Complete development of Northgate infrastructure rehab plan. Council consider CD budget — possible Northgate street rehab. October 2001 Complete construction of Eastgate Rehab Phase II&III December 2001 Evaluate results of Eastgate Rehab II&III March 2002 Evaluate results of Northgate infrastructure rehab plan. June 2002 Present citywide Rehab Master Plan with CIP budget. Implementation Plans a , idinent new;desigrr and'd6nstruct�ori;standards Plan Leader: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Summary: On March 8, 2001 a presentation was made to the council concerning street structural standards and Right -Of Way standards and recommend changes aimed at improving pavement conditions, reducing maintenance costs and providing adequate right-of-way for street, sidewalk and utility development. This presentation was made a part of a council strategic issue. As a result of 57 Vision Statement ##8 Well -Planned Neighborhoods planning program will supplement the update process, focusing on established areas and developing implementation plans. Reviews and updates of key elements of the plan, such as bikeway plans, thoroughfare plans, etc., will also be used as part of the process for updating and implementing the plan. Although this plan provides for a short-term strategy, the actual process of updating and implementing will become a long-term, ongoing activity. Policy Change: No policy change is required. Resources: Current resources will be used to implement this.plan. Those resources include existing and new positions_ Two of these are currently vacant with recruitment underway. In some cases, supplemental resources, such as consultants, may be used. Key Milestones: November 2001 Complete Neighborhood Plan for College Hills area. January 2002 Complete Business Center Small Area Planning Project January 2002 Complete Bikeway Master Plan update and expansion_ i 59 STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES Existing Resources New Resources Grand Total All Capital 0&M Total Ca Ital 0&M Total Ca ital 0&M Resources Notes 91: PROTECT ING'rIND OP,,r IZT1�IG RF�1 E • U:E S`�R�AMS �"< .. � =s ISTRATEGY a. Legislative I'lan 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt 'h. Review al' Fiscal and Budgetary Policies 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0, 0 ExSt ExSt c. Sell Property with no value 0 Ex8t ExSt, 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt STRATEGY#1 TOTAL 01 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt STRATEGY 92: CONTINIJAL'PARTICIPATION'lN INTER7G"i)VXltliMEN, I AL COQjEW&TON ,,g it. Develop inter.:overnmental work plan 0 ExSt) ExSt 0 0 0 01 ExSt ExSt u STRATEGY#2 TOTAL � 0� ExSt� ExSt 0� 0 0� 0� ExSt�� ExSt STRATEGY 43: FACILITATE.COMN1uNTGATION`AND-.00F it fJ1VSISTENG$Y i. N: PILICATTOI Q IlE�'ELOP�v]jENT T'QT V) it. Continuous Improvement Tcant 01 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt H b. Communications program 01 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt oc. Review predevelopment meeting process 01 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt tL STRATEGY #3 TOTAL 01 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt L STRATEGY #4: h10TNATING F1'ORK,ENI�IRU1liK1rN I� F` " • }K .,�s� ;� , MAx"x::: . it. Monitor compensation plan w 0 0 01 0 ... .4�. 1,876,848 1,876,848 .A�� 0 _ 1,876,848 .. , , 1,876,848 h. ('ontpetetive benefit plan U 0 0 0 0 644,000 644,000 0 644,000 644,000 c. Promote employee development 0 ExSt ExSt' 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt d. Monitor and identify trensd in retention 0 ExSt ExSt' 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt e: e. Employee recognition 0 36,000 36,000 0 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 u c �STR.4TEG}' #d TOTAL 0 36,000 36,000 0 2,52 0,848 2,520,848 0 2,556,848 2,556,848 v � . STRATEGY #5: COMPETITIVE, REASONABLE'ELECTRIC PRICES F �z, ( ' .o- ,,�� .. H•:�.. h .... >< ,,�� « �� �, <�, _�' ,,.: . �> x °sue � °. .., t Implement dcre elation strategic Ian (, . p r � p 0 100 000 0 0 100,000 100,000 0 01 0 C .2 STRATEGY#5 TOTAL 0� 100 000j 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 200,000) 200,000 STR1TECl' #L: CUSTOMER SERVICE 1 " Z" ' , ; < .. it. Facilities Master Plan 0 ExSt ExSt 0 01 0 0 ExSt ExSt b. I: GoWTechnology Plan 242,000 0 0 0 61,417 61,417 242,000 61,417 303,417 c.Chy Center Phase 1 1,560,000 0 0' 0 0 0 1,560,000 0 1,560,000 �d. New > Year ('IP 0 ExSt ExSt' 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt (STRATEGY#6TOTAL 1,802,000 ExSt ExSt 0 61,4171 61,417 1,802,000 61,417 1,863,417 j)1,S16NITi1T[-,'A?vgr176TAIs 1,802,000 136,0001 1,938,000 -012,620,8481 2,620,9481 f,802;00012,818,265 4,620,2651 ExS, _:xistinp Staff Resources VISIOI, ;TEMENT 1 STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES Existing Resources New Resources Grand Total All Capital l 0&M I Total Ca ital I 0&M I Total Ca itaI 0&M Resources ces ,! Notes STRATEGY #1: STRENGTliE1V RESIDEN1A1�QADEN1FiZMF? `�� g�a a., ; 9�NM, w `. �A W ° a. Enhance noise abatement enforcement 0 61,316 613161 0 0 0 0 61,316 61,316 b. Enhance proactive code enforcement 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 - ExSt l ExSt c 61,31�6 61,316 STRATEGY #1 TOTAL 0 61,316 61,316 0 0 0 0 3 JSTRATEGY42:GREENWAY:J� 'S1'S1ENI1M1'LEMFI�IAA11ONRliIR1>yr_>+: _..- C.�.,�z., M.s,. �1__ s ,_.. .:, .. it. Complete Wolf Pen Creek "1 rails 0 0 0 OI 0 0 0 0 0 1b. Greensway education plan ExSt ExSt 01 0 0 0 0 0 U STRATEGY #J TOTAL 0 0 0 0 r� STRATEGY 43: NIAINTAIN STORM WATER -JOD7 t ITYs a. Strategy Im storm water quality reg. � 01 ExSt ExSt 0 01 0 0 ExSt ExSt ° 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt v STRATEGY #3 TOTAL ISTRATECY #d: MAINTAIN STORl1I" VI�ATER Qrt1AL1> ,a "rt,.: t , A �s: Iti. Develp an urban lbrestry plan 0 ExSt ExSt 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 ExSt 30,000 e b. Examine alternative litel option 0 ExSt EXSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt y STRATEGY #d TOTAL 0 ExSt ExSt 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 ExSt 30,000 > `VISION S1'AT EN1tENT 3 TOTALS 1! 01 61,316 � 61,316 30,000 01 30,000 30,000 61,3161 91,31t � ExSt = Existing Staff Resources VISION STATEMENT 3 STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES Existinq Resources New Resources N Grand Total All Capital I O&M Total I Ca ital O&M Total Ca ital I O&M Resources Notes +STRATEGY #1: PURSUE METHODS O��GI�IO IN1?05E11�1'emu. on p .S a. Citizen Survey to enhance involvement 0 8,1501 8,150 Y y0 0 0 0 8,150 8,150 c a? b. Neighborhood involvement 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt W c. Increase voter turnout 0 ExSt ExSt j 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt 3 01 0 ExSt ExSt d. Citizen p� 1 STRATEGY #I,TOTAL programs f 0 8,150 J^^ 8150t I......w,., :. 0 01 0 0 8,150 8,150 o STRATEGY #Zc rACTTTTATE!IETGIiBQRQCIDA'3SQ!IAfiQN- ;�n E Ia. Formation ot'Neighborhood Assoc. 01 10,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 > E ISTRATEG1• #2 TOTAL 01 10,0001 10,000 0� 0 OC 0� _ 10,000� 10,000� U jV131ON S�TATEMEINT 5 TOTAL,S 0l 18,15®l 18,150 0 0 0 01-98,15®1 18,1501 GvC4 .=vic4inrti Go-af$ Pp.-,n➢➢rrps VISION rEMENT 5 STRATEGIC PLANNING RESOURCES Existing Resources New Resources Grand Total ( All Ca ital O&M P 1 Total Ca ital O&M Total Ca ital O&M Resources Notes STRA'1EG1 #1 'R Yi21SALA)Il Q f H�. - " a, a. Dean International recommendations 0 ExSt ExSt 01 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt STRATEGI' #t TOTA 0 0 � o STRATEGY42 RECRYTI i ETATT B,CJ E .e%.: Exf.. Y ,,.. 0 0 `� ExSt ExSt ` t V a. Marketing activities ._„w 0 0 0 .. .. ,*. 0 ...:. ..._e...... 40,000 .._ .... ;af. 40,000 ... e....:.:... .. ... .. 0 ,. F, 40,000 •, r. 40,000 ... ,. .f ... .... ... �...... L b. Evaluate availability of retail sites ; 0 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt STRATEGY #2 TOTAL ' G 0 ExSt 4 ExSt 0 40 000 40,0 00mgmgkfflk 0 I 40,000 40,000 STRATEGY #3. PROi<tOTE O ` T E �.. .. NO a. Develop new class A park 1,125,000! 0 1,125,000 2,500,000 0 2.500.000; 3.625.000 0 3,625,000 4B board L b. Develop new class B park 85,0001 0 85,000 3,465,000 0 3,465.000 3,550.000 0 3,550,000 c. Develop plan for 4B Board 01 ExSt ExSt 0 0 0 0 ExSt ExSt 4B Board. $ needed for incentives. commencal Ex St ExSt 4B Board. Communication $resources. e STRATEGY k31Tp7nd W�Lith 1,210,000 ExSt 1,210000 6,965,000 5,965,000 7,175,0 0 0 7,175,000� N e0 _.. . v STRATEGY #4: EVALUATE POIGWY`D11ZEM i0GVH GRU�3'5T,W F 'IiIS IIYi 115 RY� a • t ,. ay,,.. n , � ,t � `., n E ! a r t�� .. . c,",l a. t CV13 y � TBD TB TB TBD b. Devielop'I lot I/Cotnf ranee Center 6,600000 0 6,60 0001 5,800,000 0 5,800,0001 12,400 000 0 1 2,400,000 e C. Develop target marketing plan I'or Hotel TBD TBD TBDp 0 0 0 0 0 0 sTI1ATF.GI' #4 TOTAL 6,600,000 TBD 6,600,000 5.800.000 0 5�800.0001 12.400.000 TBD 12",400,000 > V/ J NSTATENlENTf�7T-ZTALS 7,810,0001 TBDI '1,8b,o6ol 11,765,000 d0,WO" 14,8�5,0001 1j,5�5,Od�� 40,000� 19,615,0001 FvSt = Existina Staff Resources VISION STATEMENT 7 City of College Station Parks & Recreation Department Fiscal Year 2001 Board Goals c3 Investigate the feasibility of cooperative ventures with CSISD Ei `Support the implementation of a Greenways Oversight Committee to support the Greenways Master Plan o Establish policies and standards for re -appraisal of existing parks, facilities, and services offered by the Department • Encourage arboretum/garden parks and color emphasis in existing parks • Work on plans to make current and future parks intergenerational • Set up quality standards to measure performance for maintenance and field use for neighborhood and community parks • Revision of the Surcharge Policy • Review the Parks and Recreation Department Fee Policy • Intergenerational ideas spanning all age gaps • Develop programs and facilities for senior citizens Ei Develop an Than Forestry Plan for the City of College Station u Investigate the feasibility of cooperative ventures with TAMU on facilities and programs o Explore the feasibility of a commercial ice skating rink u More interaction between Parks Advisory Board and Planning and Zoning Commission, and shared vision with City Council • Monitor code review and revision projects currently underway with respect to codes impacting parks. • Identify areas of common concern between Parks Advisory Board and Planning and Zoning Commission. • Review the parkland dedication ordinance. Keep current a file of other city parkland dedication ordinances and review every three years. • Develop criteria for parkland dedication. What are the desired characteristics of a neighborhood park with respect to size, amenities, pedestrian access, vehicle access, lighting, vehicle parking, trees, open space, connectivity to greenways, connectivity to bikeways, drainage and retention ponds, ease of maintenance, location with respect to arterial streets and the neighborhoods served, etc. • Explore further the concept of advanced planning for neighborhood parks well ahead of the development in an area. • Identify, as a part of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the future general location of community parks. Determine time frames for when they will be needed. Estimate land acquisition costs. Develop community park acquisition strategy. Page I of ❑ Explore opportunities and identify locations where parks could serve as the focal point for a neighborhood, subdivision entrance, city gateway, or arterial corridor. ❑ Further explore opportunities for developer fees and/or parkland dedication for development of community parks. Find out what other Texas cities are doing. ❑ Identify obstacles to quality parkland dedication by developers. Work to remove obstacles that are within the control of the City. ❑ Schedule a joint meeting of the Parks Advisory Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission once a year. ❑ Schedule a joint workshop meeting of the Parks Advisory Board and the City Council once a year. On -Going Activities ❑ Implementation of the approved Capital Improvement Program. ❑ Implementation of the Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan. Page 2 of 2 This policy is intended to serve as an outline for individuals or organizations seeking to name City of College Station parks and recreation facilities. This policy is not meant to be all -encompassing, but a helpful guide to make the process more fluid and practical. Each request has unique characteristics and must be addressed as such. This policy attempts to outline the minimum naming requirements as reflected by previous Parks and Recreation Advisory Board decisions and discussions. It may be necessary to supplement, as required, more detailed criteria for this process. All requests for naming a park or facility are to be presented to the Parks and Recreation Department for consideration. For consideration, the requests are to be made by a group or civic organization upon presentation of a petition containing the signatures of 25 or more registered voters from the City of College Station. Requests made by individuals will only be considered if the request satisfies Sections 1, 2 or 3 of the policy guidelines. Parks do not need to be named after an individual. When named after an individual, the justification must be compelling. 2. The naming request for a recently deceased individual will have a sixty (60) day waiting period from the time of death before the request may be proposed for consideration. 3. The Parks and Recreation Department staff will review the requests for completeness before submitting the item for consideration by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. 4. The chairperson of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board shall appoint a subcommittee that will be responsible for evaluation of the naming request and subsequent recommendation to the full Advisory Board. 5. The subcommittee shall submit its recommendation in a formal written report prior to full review by the Advisory Board. 6. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, by simple majority, shall approve or disapprove the recommendations made by the subcommittee. 7. If the subcommittee's recommendation is for approval and it is disapproved by the full Advisory Board, the matter may then be referred back to the subcommittee for further action. 8. If the subcommittee's recommendation is for denial of the request, no further action is required by the Board. 9. If the proposed naming is approved by the Advisory Board, then the recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration and final approval or disapproval. Parks and facilities should be named in the following manner: 1. In honor of individuals who donate land for park space; 2. In honor of individuals who sell open space to the City at a value considerably below market value; 3. In honor of individuals or organizations that contribute 50% or better of land and/or money for the park or facility; 4. In honor of national, state, and local heroes; 5. In honor of community leaders whose outstanding personal service has resulted in significant and enduring contributions to the community. Support for the proposed name should include endorsements by other groups, neighborhoods, or organizations. 6. In relation to the predominant geographical characteristics or physical features (lakes, rivers, streams, and trees) of the land; 7. In relation to the subdivisions within the City where the site is located; 8. In relation to streets adjacent to the park; 9. No park shall be given the same name as an existing school site or public facility, except where the sites abut one another. 10. No park or facility officially named for a particular individual will be changed. However, there may be a park or facility that has a common name with no official designation. In this instance the renaming of such properties is sometimes appropriate. INTSM41 �' • '� ` i • -VOR IN-, These guidelines are intended to insure orderly consideration, development and maintenance of monuments, memorials, and exhibits on city -owned property. They have been developed to be certain that any new additions enhance the beauty and interest of the areas in which they are placed. These guidelines should also be used as a checklist to aid anyone requesting that a monument, memorial, or exhibit be placed on city -owned property. City cemeteries are exempt from these guidelines. The following test has been developed to help insure equitable and consistent decisions dealing with these matters: 1. Please provide the following information: name, date, contact person, address and telephone number of the organization, group or individual making the request, and a statement describing the details of the proposed monument, memorial, or exhibit. 2. When involving park and recreation land or facilities, has it been presented to the Parks and Recreation Department? Procedurally, a request is first presented to the Parks and Recreation Department, and then a recommendation from staff or the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board is forwarded to the City Council for their final approval. It is suggested that requests be submitted at the earliest stages of the proposed project to insure coordination with other activities or development. 3. How is the proposed project being funded and are those funds committed and available? Please state source of funds. 4. Has the entity making the proposal made provisions for long-term maintenance and upkeep? To insure appropriate maintenance and upkeep, an acceptable plan must be approved and accepted by the City of College Station. 5. Would the proposed project increase liability to the City? Design should be in a manner that does not pose any hazard or danger to the general public. 6. Does the project provide a functional purpose compatible with the proposed site or facility? Projects that have received previous approval have had a function consistent with the location. As an example, trees, benches, gardens and fountains have been successfully incorporated into projects in a manner that memorializes or recognizes a person, date, place or thing. 7. Does the project fit conceptually, aesthetically, and architecturally with the proposed site? Most public areas have a character that is distinctive or unique. It is most appropriate to place a feature in an area where it will conform to or enhance the theme and character of the site or facility. 8. Please state the proposed timetable for accomplishing the proposal. 9. Any plaque or item of recognition that is intended to be located at the site of the proposed monument, memorial, or exhibit will be provided by the sponsor and located on site upon approval by the City of College Station.-- Free-standing markers that are proposed to be located in turf areas are to be avoided. If you have questions or need additional information, please call the College Station Parks and Recreation Department at 764-3773. If making a proposal or seeking permission to install a memorial, monument, or exhibit, please include written answers to the above questions to expedite consideration by the Parks and Recreation Department. Date Attest: Date EXHIBIT "A" That "Chapter 9, Subdivisions, Section 10, Requirements for Park Land Dedication" is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 10-A. Purpose I O-A. I This section is adopted to provide recreational areas in the form of neighborhood garks as a function of subdivision and site development -.in the City of College tation. This section is enacted in accordance with the home rule powers of the City of College Station, granted under the Texas Constitution and the statutes of the State of Texas includia but not by way of limitation, Texas Local Gov't Code Chapter 212 (Vernon 19 8; Vernon Supp. 1999). It is hereby declared by the City Council that recreational areas in the form of neighborhood parks are necessary and in the public welfare, and that the only adequate procedure to provide for same is by integrating such a requirement into the procedure for planning and developing property or subdivisions in the city whether such development consists of new con- struction on vacant land or rebuilding and remodeling of structures on existing residential property. I O-A.2 Neighborhood parks are those parks providing for a variety of outdoor recreational opportunities and located within convenient distances from a ma rity of the residences to be served thereby. The park zones established by the Darks and Recreation Department and shown on the official Parks and Recreation map for the C* of College Station shall be prima facie proof that any park located therein is 12, e within such a convenient distance from =sidence locate therein. The primary cost of neighborhood parks should be by the ultimate residential roperty owners who, by reason of the proximity of their property to such parks, shall be the primary beneficiaries of such facilities. Therefore, the following requirements are adopted to effect the purposes stated above and shall apply to any land to be used for residential purposes: 10-B General Reauirement Dedications shall cover both land and development costs for neighborhood park land for all types of residential development. 10-13- 1 Land Dedication Whenever a final plat is filed of record with the County Clerk of Brazos County for development of a residential area in accordance with the planning and zoning regula- tions of the City. such plat shall contain a clear fee simple dedication of an area of land to the City for park purposes. For single family 'ly developments this area shall be equal to one (1) acre for each one hundred and one (101) proposed dwelling units. For duplex and other multi -family development this area shall be equal to one (1) acre for each one hundred and thirty-four (134) proposed dwelling units. For methodology refer to Appendix I attached herein and incorporated and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. Any proposed plat submitted to the City for approval shall show the area proposed to be dedicated under this section. The required dedication of this subsection may be met by a payment of money in lieu of land when permitted or required by the other provisions of this section. In the event a plat is not required this dedication shall be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10-13.2 Fee in Lieu of Land A land owner responsible for dedication under this section may elect to meet the requirements of I O-B. 1. in whole or in part by a cash payment in lieu of land, in the amount set forth below. Before making this election, the land owner must obtain approval for the cash payment in lieu of land from the Planning & Zoning Commission pursuant to the plat approval procedures set out in Chapter 9, Section Such payment in lieu of Ian shall be made at or prior to the time of filing the final plat for record at the Courthouse or prior to the issuance of a building permit where a plat is not required. The fee in lieu of land dedication requirement shall be met by a payment of a fee set from time to time by resolution by the City Council, - sufficient to acquire neighborhood park land. Unless changed by the City Council, such per -acre Q price s I be computed on the basis of one hundred and forty-eight dollars ($148.0d0ger dwelling unit for single family development and one hundred and twelve 6 ars ($112.00) per dwelling unit for duplex and multi -family development. Refer to Appendix L Cash payments may be used only for acquisition or development of a neighborhood park located within the same zone as the development. I O-B.3 Park Development Fee In addition to the land dedication, there shall also be a fee set from time to time by resolution of the City Council sufficient to provide for development of the land to meet the standards for a neighborhood park to serve the zone in which such development is located. Unless changed 6 City Council this per -acre fee shall be d the basisthree hundred _anin * ' dollars O)Xer dwell' unit n 11two d nine 0' rs ;1'e 23 ) for computed pu� 0 1 e om single e family developments 0 e tsand hundred and thi' -three dollars (01 for s x g f multi-family ulti_f in, I pm developments, opm S.r t® Appendix duple and a yde ent Re e pendix s A developer has the option to construct the neighborhood park im rovements in lieu of the park development fee. Development plans and speclVications shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Board. All improvements shall either be financially guaranteed or accepted by the City prior to the filing of a plat in the case of platted developments or prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy in the event that Vatting is not required. The process of financial guarantee shall be the same as that found in section 7 of the Subdivision Regulations and shall be used whether a plat is required or not. Once improvements are accepted by the City the developer shall deed the property and improvements to the City. 10-B.5 In instances where an area of less than five (5) acres is required to be dedicated, the City shall have the right to accept the dedication for approval on the final plat or to refuse same, after consideration of the recommendation of the Planning and Toning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Board. The City shall have the right to regire payment of cash in lieu of land in the amount provided above, if it ermines that sufficient park area is already in the public domain in the area of the proposed development, or if the recreation potential for that zone would be better served by expanding or improving existing parks. 10-B.6 The dedication required by this section shall be made by filiny of the final plat or e contemporaneous by separate instrument unless additional edication is required subsequent to the 111ing oTithe final plat. If the actual number of completed dwelling units exceeds the figure upon which the original dedication was based, such additional dedication shall be required, and shall -be made by payment of the cash in lieu of land amount provided above, or by the conveyance of an entire numbered lot to the City. 10-13.7 The City may from time to time decide to purchase land for parks in or near the area of actual o otential development. If the City does purchase Dark land in a park zone, the C shall have the right to require subsequent park land dedications for i that zone to e in cash only. This will be to reimburse the City its purchase cost. Once the City has been reimbursed entirely for all such park land within a park zone, this subsection shall cease to apply, and the other subsections of this section shall again be applicable. 10-C Prior Dedication: Absence of Prior Dedication I O-C. I Credit shall be given for land and/or money dedicated pursuant to Ordinance 690 or 983. 10-C.2 If a dedication requirement arose prior to passage of this section, that dedication requirement shall be controlled by the ordinance in effect at the time such obligation arose, except that additional dedication shall be required if the actual density of structures constructed upon property is greater than the former assumed density. Additional dedication shall be revired only for the increase in density and shall be based upon the ratio set forth in 1 -B. of this section. 10-C.3 At the discretion of the City, any former gift of land to the City may be credited on a per acre basis toward eventual land dedication requirements imposed on the donor of such lands. The City Council shall consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Board in exercising its discretion under this subsection. 10-D Special Fund: Right to Refund I O-D. I There is hereby established a special fund for the deposit of all sums paid in lieu of land dedication under this section or any preceding ordinance, which fund shall be known as the park land dedication fund. 10-D.2 The City shall account for all sums paid in lieu of land dedication under this section with reference to the individual plats involved. Any funds paid for such purposes must be expended by the City within five (5) years from the date received by the City for acquisition and/or development of a neighborhood park as defined herein. Such funds shall be considered to be spent on a first in, first out basis. If not so expended, the owners of the property on the last day of such period shall be entitled to a prorata refund of such sum, computed on a square footage of area basis. The owners of such property must request such refund within one (1) year of entitlement, in writing, or such fight shall be barred. 10-E Comprehensive Plan Considerations I O-E. I The Park and Open Space Plan is intended to provide the College Station Parks and Recreation Advisory Board with a guide upon which to base future decisions. Because of the need to consider specific characteristics in the site selection process the park locations indicated on the Plan are general. The actual locations, sizes, ana number of parks will be determined when development occurs. The Plan will also be used to locate desirable park sites before development occurs, and those sites may be purchased by the City or received as donations. 10-E.2 Park Zones are established by the City's Comprehensive Plan and are configured to indicate service areas for neighborhood parks. Zone boundaries are established that follow key topographic features such as major thoroughfares, streams, and city limit lines. 1 0-F Additional Reajiirements: Definitions 10-17.1 Any land dedicated to the city under this section must be suitable for park and recreation uses. Consideration will be given to land that is in the floodplain or may be considered "floodable" even though not in a federally regulated floodplain as long as, due to its elevation, it is suitable for park improvements. (a) Neighborhood park sites should be adjacent to residential areas in a manner that serves the greatest number of users. (b) Neighborhood park sites should be located so that users are not required to cross arterial roadways to access them. (c) Sites should not be severely sloping or have unusual topography which would render the land unusable for organized recreational activities. (d) Sites should have existing trees or other scenic elements. 10-F.2 Parks should be easy to access and open to public view so as to benefit area development, enhance the visual character of the city, protect public safety and minimize conflict with adjacent land uses. The following guidelines should be used in designing parks and adjacent development. (a) Where physically feasible, park sites should be located adjacent to schools in order to encourage both shared facilities and the potential co -development of new sites. (b) A proposed subdivision adjacent to a park may not be designed to restrict reasonable access to the park from other area subdivisions. Street connections to existing or future adjoining subdivisions may be required to provide reasonable access to parks. (c) Where a non-residential use must directly abut a park, the use must be separated by a screening wall or fence and landscaping. Access points to the gamay�rk �y be allowed by the Planning and Zoning Commission if public enefit is established. (d) It is desirable that a minimum of fifty percent (50% of the perimeter of a park should abut a public street. In all cases, the Lty shallapprove the proposed street alignment fronting on city parks. (e) Streets abutting a park shall be built in accordance with the thoroughfare plan and the standards of this ordinance; however, the City may require an residential street built adjacent to a park to be constructed to collector widlt� to ensure access and prevent traffic congestion. Developer may request oversize participation in such instance. 10-G. Consideration and ADDroval Unless provided otherwise herein, an action by the City shall be by the CityCouncil, after consideration of the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Board. Any proposal considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission under this section shall have been reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board and its recommendation given to the Commission. The Commission may make a decision contrary to such recommendations only by a concurring vote of at least five (5) members. Should the Commission be unable to get this vote, the matter shall then be referred to the City Council for its decision. 10-H. Review of Dedication Reouirements The City shall review the fees set forth in this section every three (3) years. The City shall take into account inflation as it affects land and park development costs as well as the City's targeted level of service for park land per one thousand population. Fees shall be set by resolution of the City CounciL Lnm� ,I i 1 1 , M1I I. Current Level of Service 111 7 Acres Neighborhood & Community Park Land per 1,000 Population 3.5 Acres per 1,000 (Neighborhood Parks) 3.5 Acres per 1,000 (Community Parks) Land Requirements Neighborhood Parks 3.5 Acres/1,000 1 Acre per 285 people 2.81 Persons per Household (PPH) for Single Family and 2.13 Persons per Household for Multi -Family based on census information for owner and renter occupied units. The overall average from the Census is 2.31 persons per household (dwelling unit). SINGLE FAMILY 285 people / 2.81 PPH = 101 DUs 1 Acre per 101 DUs MULTI -FAMILY 285 people / 2.13 PPH= 134 DUs 1 Acre per 134 DUs Neighborhood Park Acquisition Costs (Determines Fee in Lieu of Land) (Assumption) 1 acre costs $15,000 to purchase SINGLE FAMILY $15,000 / 101 DUs = $148 per DU MULTIFAMILY $15,000 / 134 DUs = $112 per DU IV. Neighborhood Park Development Costs (Determines Fee for Development) Average Neighborhood Park in College Station Development Cost for Neighborhood Park Cost Per Acre for Development SINGLE FAMILY $31,250 / 101 DUs = $309 per DU V. Total Dedication Fee SINGLE FAMILY $148 + $309 = $457 — 8 Acres $250,000 $31,250 MULTI -FAMILY $31,250 / 134 DUs = $233 per DU MULTIFAMILY $112 + $233 = $345 TU I k,,jI Fmaw "Ge. TO: Xris- Ovol, - 7,15/01 8:35OPM , h 'Bub �,Oct, Request for Excused Abseme Kris l will beawtoff Totam on Tuesday. i� MINIM chSjUer defeg),ate to the Piano Technicians Gufld Intesternstional instituts and °°^R minarbei-rig held from My 8-15d Sparks NV, P'lea"sm, excuss my arns"emice- -Original as age_ Frkwn, Kris Startairmn, ISAATP. KST Af?,T7ZFiAAM@ e-W Sept. Thursd, , Juhy,105, 2001 1115 AM GDavis8264Cpaol.com; icwZ01T7@Dsol.com; DAVISGON Lrv; 1,V.1.0on(a sl-�G_De h p Jpn@tarnmedu; Cc: Glenn Brown; Psim Vansce.k.; Ric Pkusjer; Vieve eachy; Tom Brymer Sukiect- vo U l y I G t h bask, 8 8 0 a, V-1 1, W! sVi. i w " 0 G 0 � d mg a i mt t i n, o; i,, e.- OU 8 96 S t J) UVI lf'h l 8 i S. j U V�, a Porn i n, d a r VI the next F3ark and RscrsatiOR BWM Meang df'�al vtdl bah hold nex6i Tus.,,sVn,.tr at 7:00 p.nm, at the CegI19,0i �,--Ilarmrlk Room Tap Rwad). Ms,ass sas klinch ed, age msbnhhhrn6nksfoe ss'id, se snsIImesng. P, le ams ist me lkno-'Ri pdor to ttim Mae-ti Ing, if you have any ques-Mons or changes to,11he qx) that they cgamr), loo, re'diskributedl be rtr,th,, , a Alsa.,to snsurg% quomm requiramenilm, please coma d vne prior to the rnes�fing ifyou. vo�oii nat 63- aWate,-� aftew-'w". Pleas* ,v,—,Jw,rr,,s our nswem Bosnd spa mdubere La��,rry Farnsm,,Parth and Don Pt.flisnn. John Nlcho�s �m ab-m ejec,ed Chaininam afthe Boau,,,,:-) The psldkotswram� Sent Of-LI, this morning. Irlavaz a gre, , , ,, , 'a'' Tuesday :--) mlt 7.)d se*- 'YOU Kris Lehde star. college-- statior'L Pafl,?,aq m-keere8gin"n COUGge Station. Ernb5mccingthe Pa&'�, ENpiaring the Fulure. << F-He" Afly 10, 2,1001 AOC>> << File: June 12, 200114cyc >> 1,3_11W L/j ,) 0,0 fl Ar L, Rom: Jon Tudon To,, 'Kris Sty, man' Da!""v. 71EA101 1:00M 'SuPp�s, ct: RE July 10th Parks Bosard Mteefiring Kris - I am requesting an absence from this maefing. u am a Coach d? the CoAaga- Stz��on Amvican Afl-ES'Mr team and have a game thd evening at, that Mr-ars. Re as, pass- on weftwmiq to Our nialit` dhs,.nU, and Oupr ria,":vp bowd", niernbers. Thanks, Jan TuOikon