Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/26/2021 - Agenda Packet - Design Review Board (2)College Station, TX Meeting Agenda Design Review Board Phone *888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 964 8719 8407 Internet: https://zoom.us/j/96487198407 The City Council may or may not attend this meeting. February 26, 2021 11:00 AM 1101 Texas Ave  College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Page 1 *The City uses a third­party vendor to help host the meeting and if the call­in number is not  functioning access will be through the internet link only.      1.Call meeting to order and consider absence requests.        2.Hear Visitors.     Speaker Protocol: An individual who wishes to address the Board regarding any item on the Regular  Agenda, shall register with the Board Secretary prior to 9 a.m. on the day of the meeting. To register,  the individual must provide a name and phone number by calling 979.764.3743 or emailing  tromero@cstx.gov prior to 9 a.m. To submit written comments to the Board, email tromero@cstx.gov  and they will be distributed to the Board. Upon being called to speak, an individual must state their  name and city of residence, including the state of residence if the city is located out of state.  Speakers are encouraged to identify their College Station neighborhood or geographic location.  Each speaker's remarks are limited to three (3) minutes. Any speaker addressing the Board through  the use of a translator may speak for six (6) minutes. At the (3) minute mark, the Board Secretary will  announce that the speaker must conclude their remarks.     3.Agenda Items     3.1.Consideration discussion and possible action to approve meeting minutes. Attachments:1.February 14, 2020 3.2.Presentation, discussion, and possible action to consider Alternative Compliance to the Unified  Development Ordinance Section 7.10 Non­Residential Architectural Standards for the Kelsey­ Seybold Call Center located at 1150 Copperfield Parkway. Case #NRA2021­000001  Sponsors:Rachel Lazo   Attachments:1.Staff Report 2.Architect Letter 3.Elevations & Renderings    4.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.     A member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific  factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited  to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.     5.Adjourn.     Page 1 of 13  Design Review Board Page 2 February 26, 2021 Adjournment into Executive Session may occur in order to consider any item listed on the agenda if a  matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.                                                     I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,  1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on February 19, 2021 at 5:00 p.m.     City Secretary   This  building  is  wheelchair  accessible.  Persons  with  disabilities  who  plan  to  attend  this meeting    and   who   may   need   accommodations,   auxiliary   aids,   or   services   such   as interpreters,   readers,  or  large  print  are  asked  to  contact  the  City  Secretary’s  Office  at  (979) 764­3541,  TDD   at  1­800­735­2989,  or  email  adaassistance@cstx.gov  at  least  two  business days  prior  to  the   meeting  so  that  appropriate  arrangements  can  be  made.  If  the  City  does not  receive   notification  at  least  two  business  days  prior  to  the  meeting,  the  City  will  make  a reasonable  attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant  to  Section  30.07,  Penal  Code  (Trespass  by  License  Holder  with  an  Openly  Carried     Handgun)     A     Person     Licensed     under     Subchapter     H,     Chapter     411,  Government   Code   (Handgun   Licensing   Law),   may   not   enter   this   Property   with   a  Handgun that is Carried Openly."  Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme  a  la  Seccion  30.07 del  codigo  penal  (traspasar  portando  armas  de  mano al    aire   libre   con   licencia),   personas   con   licencia   bajo   del   Sub­Capitulo   H,   Capitulo  411,  Codigo  de  Gobierno  (Ley  de  licencias  de  arma  de  mano),  no  deben  entrar  a  esta  propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 2 of 13 Minutes Design Review Board February 14, 2020 11:00 AM Administrative Conference Room 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas, 77840 Board Members Present:Dennis Christianson, David Hebert, Ray Holliday, William McKinney, and Luke Marvel Board Members Absent:Susan McGrail, and Katherine Cabrera Staff Present: Assistant Director Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner Jade Broadnax, Graduate Engineer II Alma Guerra, and Staff Assistant II Tiffany Romero AGENDA ITEM NO. 1:Call to order. Chairperson Christianson called the meeting to order at 11:00 a.m. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting minutes. December 11, 2019 Board member McKinney motioned to approve the minutes. Board member Holliday seconded the motion, which passed (5-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 3:Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve absences from meetings. Susan McGrail ~ February 14, 2020 Katherine Cabrera ~ February 14, 2020 Christianson abstained, Board member McKinney motioned to approve the absences. Board member Marvel seconded the motion, which passed (4-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Presentation, discussion, and possible action to consider Alternative Compliance to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.10 Non- Residential Architectural Standards for the Boat & RV Storage Center located at 7103 Rock Prairie Road. Case #NRA2020-000004 (Jade Broadnax) Page 3 of 13 Staff Planner Broadnax presented the item to the Board. She stated that the applicant is requesting an alternative compliance to the UDO Non-Residential Architectural Standards for the Building Facades. The applicant Nathan Winchester and Andrew Thomsen, Winchester Architects, presented to the Board. There was general discussion amongst the Board. Board Member Marvel motioned to approve the item contingent upon provision of architectural elements on the south façade building A. Board Member Hebert seconded the motion which passed (5-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items – A Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There were no items presented. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 11:40 am. APPROVED: _________________________________ Chairperson ATTEST: _________________________________ Tiffany Romero, Staff Assistant II Page 4 of 13 Design Review Board February 26, 2021 Page 1 of 3 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Non-Residential Architectural Standards Alternative Compliance for Kelsey-Seybold Call Center NRA2021-000001 REQUEST:Alternative compliance to the Non-Residential Architectural Standards LOCATION:1150 Copperfield Parkway ZONING DISTRICT:GC General Commercial APPLICANT:Jeanette Shaw, Powers Brown Architecture PROJECT MANAGER:Rachel Lazo, Senior Planner rlazo@cstx.gov ITEM SUMMARY: One story medical office facility approximately 25,000 square feet in area, located at the intersection of Copperfield Parkway and Crescent Pointe Parkway. Page 5 of 13 Design Review Board February 26, 2021 Page 3 of 3 Page 6 of 13 Design Review Board February 26, 2021 Page 3 of 3 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY As stated in Section 7.10.A of the Unified Development Ordinance, non-residential architectural standards are intended to: 1)Protect and enhance the character and quality of non-residential buildings and associated site elements in the interest of the general welfare of the City; 2)Establish minimum design parameters for the appearance of non-residential buildings, including heightened standards for more visible and prominent areas of the community; 3)Not limit architectural creativity or prescribe a specific architectural style; and 4)Provide a balance between the community’s economic and aesthetic concerns. The Unified Development Ordinance grants the Design Review Board (DRB) the authority to hear and decide proposals for alternative compliance to the Non-Residential Architectural Standards. Specifically, Section 7.10.D states: "The Design Review Board (DRB) may authorize variation to the overall requirements of the Non-Residential Architectural Standards through application from a licensed architect for an alternative compliance approval that would allow innovative or visually interesting design or to address unique circumstances not otherwise permitted through strict adherence to this section. Such requests must show reasonable evidence that the purposes of the requirements as set forth in this section were maintained and the additional design flexibility afforded does not provide a means to permit design of lesser quality." Based on these criteria, the Design Review Board can act upon the proposed request as follows: 1) Approve the request as proposed; 2) Approve the request with conditions; or 3) Deny the request. CRITERIA: In order to promote quality construction and visually interesting non-residential structures, the UDO specifies minimum architectural standards to achieve this goal. As the intent of the Design Review Board’s alternative compliance process is to offer an approval option that allows architects and the Board the ability to discuss overall visions and individual design decisions, dialog is not limited to non-compliant design elements. The architect for the project has provided a letter regarding the request, which is attached to this report. The applicant states that with the composition and variety of materials and detailing provided, this building meets the design intent of the Non-Residential Architectural Standards outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance. SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1.Applicant Letter 2.Elevations Page 7 of 13 Rachel Lazo Senior Planner City of College Station February 9, 2021 RE: Kelsey-Seybold Call Center – NRA Application Design Narrative Kelsey-Seybold operates dozens of clinics in Texas, and they have selected College Station for the construction of a new Customer Care Center, or call center. This facility will provide work for hundreds of employees after future phases are built, and will act as a hub for emergency operations for the company in times of natural disasters. Kelsey-Seybold typically embodies a design aesthetic for their clinics that centers around a rotunda used for the entries to welcome patients and identify the area for patient access. In addition, all of the Kelsey-Seybold clinics also use warm paint tones, stone tiles and applied trims to evoke a traditional appearance. Even though this facility is not for patient use, Kelsey- Seybold still wanted it to be recognizable as a Kelsey-Seybold structure, but they needed to do so in a more cost effective manner. The building is a single story tiltwall facility that has an eased arch element at the entry, which evokes the rotunda typical to the Kelsey-Seybold Clinic. In this application it is treated as a free-standing element. This arched entry is clad with a local Hill Country limestone, which also extends along the base of the building to ground the building to the site. Typical Kelsey-Seybold warm paint colors are used, as is the standard blue glass. The materials create a natural and traditional look for the building. With regards to the Unified Development Code of College Station and the Non-Residential Architectural Standards, there are some design elements of the call center which do vary slightly from the requirements. All of these variations are related to the construction type of the building and the difficulty and high cost of modifying this to comply with portions of the code, but the design has been modified to create a visual interest that is in the spirit of the design code standards. The primary entry façade requires horizontal façade articulation which is not possible with tiltwall construction. However, the design has many various elements to create a visual interest to accommodate the requirements: · Vertical bands, using horizontal formliner (corrugated texture), have been added in between every window (at approximately every 15’ along the façade) to break up the smooth panel and provide visual relief. · A continuous band of limestone runs along the entire length of the elevation at the base to ground the building and provide textural contrast. · A larger expanse of full-height native limestone and full height windows encompasses at least 1/3 of the primary façade, and this area also has a different parapet height. Sunshades have been added to the full height windows in this area also that project 2’-6” from the building. · A floating curved plane is provided at the entry door which also has full-height Texas limestone on it, along with metal accent bands to accentuate the signage. · To provide a sense of arrival and shelter, the building entry has a metal canopy directing people in and protecting the entryway. · Additional accent paint is also included to avoid monotony. On the façade that is visible from the public way (Crescent Point Parkway), there are architectural relief elements similar to what is listed above which create visual interests to accommodate the requirements: · Vertical bands, using horizontal formliner (corrugated texture), have been added in between every window (at approximately every 15’ along the façade) to break up the smooth panel and provide visual relief. · A continuous band of limestone is along the entire length of the elevation at the base to ground the building and provide textural contrast. Page 8 of 13 · A metal canopy is provided at the glass entry on this façade which projects 5’ from the building. · Additional accent paint is also included to avoid monotony. The other two facades do not face any public streets, and are not required to comply with the architectural relief requirements, but similar design elements have been utilized all the way around the building, including formliner and accent paints, stone base and accents, and metal canopies for design continuity. The facility’s design and composition contains many varied elements that create a visual interest on all facades. By incorporating textures, accent colors, and native Texas limestone, the building is articulated with different projections and design relief elements to comply with the intent of the Unified Development Code requirements. Thank you, Jeanette Shaw, AIA, RID, LEED AP Director of Quality and Sustainability Powers Brown Architecture Page 9 of 13 KELSEY-SEYBOLD COLLEGE STATION CALL CENTER11 JAN 2021 ADDRESS: 1204 Copperfield Pkwy College Station, TX 77845 APPLICANT: Jeanette Shaw, AIAPowers Brown Architecture2100 Travis, Suite 501Houston, TX 77002713.705.6526 DEVELOPER:Norman DietrichWelltower, Inc4500 Dorr StToledo, OH 43515615.480.5085 TENANT:Nicholas RoKelsey-Seybold 11511 Shadow Creek ParkwayPearland, TX 77584713.442.0726 “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” Page 10 of 13 (PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT PAINT COLOR) CORRUGATED TEXTURED FORMLINER- TO MATCH ROOF SCREEN (TYP)PREFINISHED METAL SUNSHADE TOMATCH WINDOW SYSTEM - 30" DEEP(TYP @ FULL HEIGHT WINDOWS) CORRUGATED TEXTURED FORMLINER- TO MATCH ROOF SCREEN (TYP)ALUMINUM CANOPY SYSTEM - COLORTO MATCH WINDOW SYSTEM (TYP) ALUM CORRUGATED ROOFSCREEN-PREFINISHED TOMATCH P1 ALUM CORRUGATED ROOFSCREEN- PREFINISHED TO MATCH P1 (BLUE WITH WHITE MULLIONS) Page 11 of 13 ALUM CORRUGATED ROOFSCREEN-PREFINISHED TOMATCH P1 ALUM CORRUGATED ROOFSCREEN-PREFINISHED TO MATCH P1 CORRUGATED TEXTURED FORMLINER- TO MATCH ROOF SCREEN (TYP)ALUMINUM CANOPY SYSTEM - COLORTO MATCH WINDOW SYSTEM (TYP) CORRUGATED TEXTURED FORMLINER- TO MATCH ROOF SCREEN (TYP) ALUMINUM CANOPY SYSTEM - COLORTO MATCH WINDOW SYSTEM (TYP) Page 12 of 13 Page 13 of 13